alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. Riha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WNC CALIFORNIA
   HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P. ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly  report does  not  contain any
   untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit  to  state a  material
   fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the
   circumstances under which such statements were  made, not misleading
   with respect to the period  covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information  included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
   cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in
   this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's  other certifying officer and I are responsible for
   establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures
   (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for  the
   registrant and we have:

   (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information  relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
        those  entities, particularly  during  the period in which this
        quarterly report is being prepared;

   (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness of  the  registrant's  disclosure
        controls  and   procedures  and  presented  in  this report our
        conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls
        and  procedures, as of the  end of the period  covered  by this
        report based on such evaluation; and

   (c)  Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting that occurred  during
        the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
        affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially  affect, the
        registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and  I  have disclosed,
   based  on our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
   financial  reporting,  to  the  registrant's  independent registered
   accounting firm  and  the  audit committee of the registrant's board
   of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent functions):


   (a)  All significant deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of
        internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
        ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
        and have  identified for the registrant's auditors any material
        weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2005




 /s/ Thomas J. Riha
-------------------
Senior Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Santos, Appellant.

[786 NYS2d 742]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered October 10, 2002, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

While it appears that defendant served a pro se motion for assignment of new counsel upon the People, the record does not establish that defendant ever filed that motion with the court. Even assuming that defendant filed the motion, he abandoned it by failing to call the court’s attention to the fact that the motion remained unresolved, having had the opportunity to do so at the subsequent guilty plea and sentencing proceedings *(see e.g. People v Brimage,*214 AD2d 454 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 732 [1995]). In any event, the record clearly establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea *(see People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]), and that the motion was patently meritless. Concur—Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Johnny R. Marte, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 854]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*774Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a truck driver helper, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused a reasonable request of the employer to make a delivery to New Jersey. Although claimant maintained that he was unfamiliar with the route, the employer testified that the location was approximately five miles from its business and that claimant was given a map. Claimant continued to refuse the assignment even after being warned that he could be discharged. Moreover, the record indicates that claimant previously had made deliveries to New Jersey. Under these circumstances, the Board’s decision that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Marcano [Commissioner of Labor],*271 AD2d 795 [2000]; *Matter of Moucatel [Hudacs],*205 AD2d 822 [1994]). Claimant’s contention that he did not have the proper license to drive a truck in New Jersey was not raised at the hearing and, therefore, is not properly before this Court *(see Matter of Hicks [Commissioner of Labor],*10 AD3d 758 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### ELEANOR GAUVRY v. FRANK A. GAUVRY.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.82

                         ACME Television Holdings, LLC
                                   Suite 202
                             10829 Olive Boulevard
                              St. Louis, MO 63141
                    Tel: (314) 989-0566 Fax: (314) 989-0616



                                October 4, 1999

VIA FACSIMILE (561-833-1096)

Devon Paxson, President
DP Media of Battle Creek, Inc.
Suite 204
231 Bradley Place
Palm Beach, FL 44380

Re: WZPX-TV

Dear Mr. Paxson:

         This letter concerns implementation of the Joint Sales Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated April 23, 1999, by and between DP Media of Battle Creek,
Inc. ("DP Media") and ACME Television Holdings, LLC ("ACME").

         In order to explore and hopefully facilitate a mutually satisfactory
resolution of issues relating to the Agreement, the parties have agreed that,
except as otherwise stated in this letter, they will not implement or seek to
enforce their respective rights and obligations under the Agreement for a period
of thirty (30) days from the date of this letter (the "Standstill Period"),
which is the close of business on Thursday, November 4, 1999. Notwithstanding
the existence of the Standstill Period, DP Media will honor its obligations
under its Secondary Affiliation Agreement with The WB Television Network
commencing on 7 a.m. on October 6, 1999.

         It is understood and agreed that neither the execution of this letter
nor the existence of the Standstill Period will prejudice any party with respect
to its rights or any position which any party has taken or may take in the
future with respect to the Agreement and ancillary documents. To that end, the
failure of the Term to commence as planned on October 1, 1999 cannot be invoked
to the prejudice of either party.

         If this letter accurately and completely reflects our agreement, I
would appreciate it if you could sign on the appropriate line below and fax the
signed letter back to me and mail the hard copy to me at the above address.
Execution of the letter will also confirm that copies of faxed signatures will
be deemed sufficient to make this letter agreement effective.





<PAGE>   2

Devon Paxson, Vice President
October 4, 1999
Page 2

                         Sincerely,

                         ACME TELEVISION HOLDINGS, LLC


                         By:   /s/ DOUGLAS GEALY
                               ----------------------------------
                                   Douglas Gealy, President

AGREED:

DP MEDIA OF BATTLE CREEK, INC.

By: /s/ DEVON PAXSON
    --------------------------------
        Devon Paxson, Vice President

cc: Lew Paper (via facsimile)
    Alan Campbell (via facsimile)
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2166

To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt abortions of pregnancies 

in cases of rape and incest from a limitation on use of Department 

of Defense funds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2004

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. 

CLINTON, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt abortions 

of pregnancies in cases of rape and incest from a limitation on use of Department of Defense funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR 

4 ABORTIONS IN CASES OF RAPE AND INCEST. 

5 Section 1093(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by inserting before the period at the end the fol-
2

•S 2166 IS 

1 lowing: ‘‘or in a case in which the pregnancy is the result 

2 of an act of rape or incest’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         Each director and/or officer of FindWhat.com (the "Corporation") whose
signature appears below hereby appoints Courtney Phillips Jones, Robert D.
Brahms, and Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson as the undersigned's attorneys or any of
them individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's
name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission
any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also
appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its
attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 27th day of
March, 2000.

SIGNATURE                                  TITLE


/s/ Courtney P. Jones                      Chairman of the Board of Directors
-----------------------------------
     Courtney P. Jones


/s/ Robert D. Brahms                       Chief Executive Officer and Director
-----------------------------------
     Robert D. Brahms


/s/ Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson             President, Chief Technical Officer
-----------------------------------        and Director
     Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson


/s/ Michael Schulman                       Chief Financial Officer
-----------------------------------
     Michael Schulman


/s/ David Medinis                          Director
-----------------------------------
     David Medinis


/s/ Lee Simonson                           Director
-----------------------------------
     Lee Simonson


/s/ Ken Christensen                        Director
-----------------------------------
     Ken Christensen
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2074

For the relief of Klaus Dieter Hinze, Heidi Hinze, Annamarie Hinze, and 

Roberto Arndt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Mr. DORGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Klaus Dieter Hinze, Heidi Hinze, 

Annamarie Hinze, and Roberto Arndt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR KLAUS DI4 ETER HINZE, HEIDI HINZE, ANNAMARIE 

5 HINZE, AND ROBERTO ARNDT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Klaus Dieter Hinze, Heidi Hinze, Annamarie Hinze, 

9 and Roberto Arndt shall each be eligible for issuance of 

10 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 
2

•S 2074 IS 

1 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

2 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

3 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

4 to lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Klaus Dieter 

6 Hinze, Heidi Hinze, Annamarie Hinze, and Roberto Arndt 

7 enter the United States before the filing deadline specified 

8 in subsection (c), Klaus Dieter Hinze, Heidi Hinze, 

9 Annamarie Hinze, and Roberto Arndt shall be considered 

10 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other11 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 

12 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of 

13 the date of enactment of this Act. 

14 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

15 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap16 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica17 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

18 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

19 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

20 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res21 idence to Klaus Dieter Hinze, Heidi Hinze, Annamarie 

22 Hinze, and Roberto Arndt the Secretary of State shall in23 struct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the current 

24 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi25 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun-
3

•S 2074 IS 

1 try of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

3 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na4 tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

5 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

(2) NASA contracts sourced in the state in FY21; see FY21 NASA Economic Impact Report (3) Categories are not additive. For more information on FY21 Sample Obligations, please visit: NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS)

(1) For more information please visit: Value of NASA 

NASA Overall State Impact(1)

• Jobs Supported 481

• Economic Output $92,832,000

• State Tax Revenue $3,004,000

Moon to Mars Campaign State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 47

• Economic Output $9,388,000

• State Tax Revenue $291,000

Investments in Climate Change Research & 

Technology State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 106

• Economic Output $21,721,000

• State Tax Revenue $684,000

Sample Obligations(3)

Business $26,128,749 

• Other Than Small Business $24,032,864 

• Small Business $2,095,885 

 – 8(A) Program $0 

 – Economically Disadvantaged Women 

 Owned Small Business $101,282 

 – Historically Underutilized Business 

 (HUBZone) $0 

 – Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

 Business $0 

 – Small Business Innovative Research $1,700,852 

 – Small Disadvantaged Business $182,770 

 – Veteran Owned Small Business $36,508 

 – Woman Owned Small Business $131,282 

 – Small Business Only $145,755 

Educational $12,542,652 

Government $0 

Non-profit Institutions $0 

Leading State-based NASA Business 

Contractors

The Boeing Company $23,431,530 

ThermAvant Technologies, LLC $874,931 

Impossible Sensing, LLC $873,783 

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. $522,278 

Paragon Solutions, Inc. $101,282 

Leading State-based NASA Education Funding 

Washington University $9,564,574 

University of Missouri $2,650,215 

Saint Louis University $327,863 

Space Grant Consortium 

Missouri University of Science & Technology $897,119 

MISSOURI

FY21 State Procurement Investments (2) $29.8 M
For more information about the

Economic Impact Report

for your state, go to:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street, SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers

www.nasa.gov

James Webb Space Telescope

Cycle 1 Hours of Access

NASA Astronauts

Thomas Akers

Robert Behnken

Linda Godwin

Mike Hopkins*

Janet Kavandi

Robert Springer

There are 9 NASA federal jobs and 272* contractors in the state 

of Missouri. 

For every NASA federal job located in Missouri, an additional 

52.4** jobs are supported in the state economy. For every 

million dollars’ worth of economic output generated by NASA 

federal jobs, an additional $21** million worth of output is 

sustained throughout the state economy. 

* Indirect effects are the purchases of goods and services by 

government agencies and private sector contractors, as well as by 

the industries that supply them.

** Multiplier based on IMPLAN Input Output (I-O) model. To learn more, 

please visit: https://blog.implan.com/understanding-implan-multipliers

MISSOURI

481

NASA Jobs

Supported

* Current

Twenty-two Missouri 

suppliers contributed to 

NASA’s Artemis program. 

An example of the state’s 

contributions is supplying 

large stainless-steel fittings 

for the boosters.

Missouri Institutions

577.4

Hours
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code**

In connection with the periodic report of FindWhat.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson                                                                     Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerFindWhat.com, Inc.

 

Date: March 16, 2005

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Ward, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Blue Moon Investments
      for the year ended September 30, 2008(the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Blue Moon Investments.                                                                

Dated: January 13,  2009

| | /s/ *David Ward*                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | David Ward                                               
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial
| | Officer and Director                                     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial  
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                
| | Blue Moon Investments                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Blue Moon
Investments and will be retained by Blue Moon Investments and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Toyota Motor
Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that, to such officers knowledge:



1. The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By:

/s/    HIROSHI
OKUDAName:

Hiroshi OkudaTitle:

Chairman of the BoardDate:

July 2, 2004By:

/s/    RYUJI
ARAKIName:

Ryuji ArakiTitle:

Executive Vice President, Member of the BoardDate:

July 2, 2004




(A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Toyota Motor Corporation and will be retained by Toyota Motor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Amin Kallamni, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered January 15, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 months, concurrent with 5 years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly permitted the People to introduce statements defendant’s former counsel made at defendant’s arraignment. These statements, which contradicted defendant’s trial testimony, were properly admitted as vicarious admissions *(see People v Brown,*98 NY2d 226 [2002]). It is clear from the phrasing of the attorney’s statements and all the surrounding circumstances that defendant was the source of the information *(see People v Moye,*11 AD3d 212 [2004]).

The court’s interested witness charge was balanced and *317provided the jury with proper guidance in assessing the effect on credibility of any witness’s possible interest in the case *(see People v Inniss,*83 NY2d 653, 659 [1994]; *People v Agosto,*73 NY2d 963, 967 [1989]). The court was not obligated to specifically mention the victim’s lawsuit against the owner of the premises where the incident occurred.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his constitutional claims, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.