alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 06-14-00099-CV

—————————

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA

—————————————————————————————————

RICHARD PARKER

Appellant

v.

JOANN PARKER NEAL

Appellee

—————————————————————————————————

On Appeal from the 276th District Court of Camp County

Robert Rolston, Judge Presiding

—————————————————————————————————

AGREED MOTION TO ISSUE MANDATE

—————————————————————————————————

On June 30, 2015, this Court issued its opinion and judgment in this case,

affirming the trial court’s judgment which determined that Nobie Parker’s 2006 will

(which named Appellant Richard Parker as the only beneficiary) was invalid. See

Opinion at p. 1. As noted in the Court’s opinion, Nobie’s 2003 will divided her estate

equally among her children, including Appellant Richard Parker and Appellee JoAnn

Parker Neal. See Opinion at p. 1 n.1.

Now that the Court has issued its opinion regarding the 2006 will, Richard and

AGREED MOTION TO ISSUE MANDATE Page 1

ACCEPTED

06-14-00099-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/16/2015 10:12:22 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/16/2015 10:12:22 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
JoAnn are ready to return to the trial court regarding probate of the 2003 will. As

such, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 18.1(c), Richard and JoAnn

agree to issuance of the mandate at the Court’s earliest convenience.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellee JoAnn Parker Neal

prays that this Court enter an order granting her Agreed Motion for Issuance of

Mandate and that the Court issue its mandate at the Court’s earliest convenience. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Chad M. Ruback

Chad M. Ruback

State Bar No. 90001244

The Ruback Law Firm

8117 Preston Road

Suite 300

Dallas, Texas 75225

(214) 522-4243

(214) 522-2191 facsimile

chad@appeal.pro

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

On July 16, 2015, I conferred with Tom S. McCorkle, counsel for Appellant

Richard Parker, and he agrees to the relief sought in this motion.

/s/ Chad M. Ruback

Chad M. Ruback

AGREED MOTION TO ISSUE MANDATE Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On July 16, 2015, I served a copy of this document to the following counsel for

Appellant Richard Parker:

Tom S. McCorkle

403 W. Tyler Street

Gilmer, Texas 75644

/s/ Chad M. Ruback

Chad M. Ruback

AGREED MOTION TO ISSUE MANDATE Page 3
- SLS-4891 - GREETINGS FROM Postcard FINAL FRONT
- SLS-4909 - GREETINGS FROM Generic Postcard BACK
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2246 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2246

         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain sorbic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2004

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain sorbic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SORBIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.28.11       Sorbic Acid (Cas     1.5%       No change        No change        On or before 12/
                          No. 110-44-1)                                                     31/2006           ''
                          (provided for in                                                                     .
                          subheading
                          2916.19.20).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-116179, 333-48178, 333-53560 and 333-145441) of Avici Systems Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AviciSystems Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Avici Systems Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 10, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Caspian Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the transition period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), the undersigned, Laird Garrard, Chief Executive Officer of Caspian Services, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

 (1) The amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2) The information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date: January 29, 2007 | /s/ Laird Garrard                          |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                   | Laird Garrard, Principal Executive Officer |
Exhibit 21.1

| Name of Subsidiary                   |   | State/Country of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                           |
| *Wholly-owned Direct Subsidiaries*   |   |                           |
| B&B Advertising, Inc.            |   | Delaware                       |
| BeFirst Internet Corporation         |   | Delaware                       |
| Comet Systems, Inc.                  |   | Delaware                       |
| Miva Corporation                     |   | California                     |
| Who Midco Corporation                |   | Delaware                       |
|                                 |   |                           |
| *Wholly-owned Indirect Subsidiaries* |   |                           |
| Espotting Media Inc.                 |   | Delaware                       |
| Espotting Media (UK) Ltd.            |   | United Kingdom                 |
| Espotting Media Ireland Ltd.         |   | Ireland                        |
| Espotting Scandinavia                |   | Sweden                         |
| Espotting Media (FR) SARL            |   | France                         |
| Espotting Espana, S.L.               |   | Spain                          |
| Espotting Media (DE) GmbH            |   | Germany                        |
| Espotting Media S.r.l.               |   | Italy                          |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATON
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009, the (“Report”),I, Catherine M. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 906 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/Catherine M.
Davidson


Catherine
M. Davidson


Financial
Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)








May 14,
2009
































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### HAMBY v. HAMBY

No. 368P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 635

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUSTAVO ESCAMILLA; GREENWAY

NUTRIENTS, INC.,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

- Appellee

. No. 21

- 55417

D.C. No. 2:21

- cv

- 01910

- ODW

- JEM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Gustavo Escamilla and Greenway Nutrients, Inc. appeal from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging violations of the Crime Victims’

Rights Act (“CRVA”) , 18 U.S.C. § 3771. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C

.

§ 1291. We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul

,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 55417

547 F.3d 1055, 1058

- 59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Appellants’ claims under the CVRA are foreclosed by this court ’ s previous

order denying appellants’ petition for a writ of mandamus

, which concluded that

“the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3771 do not apply to this petition.” See Rebel Oil

Co., Inc. v. Atl. Richfield Co. , 146 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 1998) (“Under the

doctrine of ‘law of the case,’ a court is generally preclude d from reconsidering an

issue that has already been decided by the same court, or a higher court in the

identical case.”).

We reject as without merit appellants’ contentions that the district court

erred by failing to act on allegations of attorney wrongdoing that occurred in a

different action, or that Judge Wright was biased.

Appellants’ motions to take judicial notice (Docket Entry Nos. 6 and 7) are

denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. JOSEPH BONNANO.

July 2, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.3





Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Donald J. Tringali, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cartesian, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








BY:/s/ DONALD J. TRINGALIDonald J. TringaliExecutive Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: April 27, 2018
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, William A. McDonnell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rent-Way, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchanged Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date:August 8, 2005    /S/ WILLIAM A. MCDONNELL                          Signature     VICE PRESIDENT & CFO                          Title
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson, certify    that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FindWhat.com, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material aspects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report. 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 16, 2005           

 

/s/  Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson                                                              Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerFindWhat.com, Inc.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2060 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2060

 To permit certain local law enforcement officers to carry firearms on 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2004

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit certain local law enforcement officers to carry firearms on 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO CARRY 
              FIREARMS ON AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Transportation for 
Security shall prescribe regulations that permit qualified local law 
enforcement officers to carry accessible weapons while onboard an 
aircraft to the same extent and subject to the same limits as Federal 
law enforcement officers are permitted pursuant to section 1544.219 of 
title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation.
    (b) Qualified Local Law Enforcement Officer.--In this section, the 
term ``qualified local law enforcement officer'' means any full-time 
municipal, county, or State law enforcement officer, whether or not on 
official travel, who--
            (1) is a direct employee of a government agency that--
                    (A) employs more than 400 employees; and
                    (B) is accredited by a nationally recognized law 
                enforcement accreditation program;
            (2) is armed in accordance with an agency-wide policy 
        established by the employing agency by directive or policy 
        statement; and
            (3) otherwise complies with the requirements relating to 
        Federal law enforcement officers.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61298-61299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for U.S. Navy F-35C West Coast 
Homebasing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy, after carefully weighing the 
strategic, operational, and environmental consequences of the proposed 
action, announces its decision to provide facilities and functions to 
support homebasing of F-35C aircraft at Naval Air Station (NAS) 
Lemoore, California, by accomplishing the proposed action as set out in 
Alternative 2 of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for U.S. Navy 
F-35C West Coast Homebasing. Under Alternative 2, a total of 100 F-35C 
aircraft in seven Navy Pacific Fleet squadrons (10 aircraft per 
squadron) and the Fleet Replacement Squadron (30 aircraft) will be 
homebased at NAS Lemoore beginning in 2016. The proposed action will be 
completed in the 2028 timeframe. The 100 F-35C aircraft will replace 70 
aging FA-18 Hornet aircraft. As a result, aircraft loading at NAS 
Lemoore will gradually increase by a net of 30 aircraft over the 13-
year period. There will be no changes in aircraft loading at Naval Air 
Facility (NAF) El Centro, California, under Alternative 2. Homebasing 
the F-35C at NAS Lemoore will result in an increase of approximately 
68,400 operations per year at NAS Lemoore and an increase of 
approximately 800 operations per year at NAF El Centro.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete text of the Record of Decision 
(ROD) is available on the project Web

[[Page 61299]]

site at www.navyf35cwestcoasteis.com, along with the Final EIS U.S. 
Navy F-35C West Coast Homebasing, dated May 2014 and supporting 
documents. Single copies of the ROD are available upon request by 
contacting: U.S. Navy F-35C EIS Project Manager, Naval Facilities 
Engineering Command Southwest, Attn: Code EV21.AK, 1220 Pacific 
Highway, Building 1, 5th Floor, San Diego, California 92132.

    Dated: October 6, 2014.
N.A. Hagerty-Ford,
Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24224 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda (FINAL) 

Wednesday, March 13, 2024 

THE MEETING WILL BE VIRTUAL FOR THE PUBLIC - SEE DETAILS BELOW. 

Wednesday, March 13 (Sessions are public except as noted) 

10:30 to 10:45 AM Welcome and Announcements 

10:45 AM to 12:00 PM ARMD FY25 Budget Overview 

12:00 to 1:00 PM Lunch (non-public) 

1:00 - 2:30 PM Workforce Efforts 

2:30 to 2:45 PM Break 

2:45 to 3:45 PM NASA 2040 

3:45 to 3:50 PM Public Comment Period 

3:50 to 4:10 PM Committee Deliberations 

4:10 to 4:30 PM Work Plan and Schedule Review 

4:30 PM Adjourn 

JOIN WEBEX MEETING Click here to join the meeting 

13-Mar-24 

Meeting number: 119 716 527 4 

Meeting password: dhuopg 

JOIN BY PHONE 

US Toll: +1 256-715-9946,,282794831# 

Passcode: 282 794 831#
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

Of Chief Executive Officer



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of eDiets.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R.
Humble, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 15, 2004



By:

/s/ David R. HumbleName:

David R. HumbleTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to eDiets.com, Inc. and will be retained by eDiets.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.