alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                        JURISDICTION OF
             SUBSIDIARY                  INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------   ----------------
Austin Printing Company, Inc.........   Georgia
Bridgetown Printing Co...............   Texas
CGML General Partner, Inc............   Delaware
Chas. P. Young Company...............   Texas
Chas. P. Young Company, Inc. ........   New York
Clear Visions, Inc. .................   Texas
Columbia Color, Inc..................   California
Consolidated Eagle Press, Inc. ......   Texas
Consolidated Graphics Management,
  Inc. ..............................   Delaware
Consolidated Graphics Management II,
  Inc................................   Delaware
Consolidated Graphics Properties,
  Inc. ..............................   Texas
Consolidated Graphics Properties II,
  Inc. ..............................   Texas
Heath Printers, Inc. ................   Washington
Consolidated Mobility, Inc. .........   Texas
Courier Printing Company.............   Tennessee
Direct Color, Inc. ..................   California
Emerald City Graphics, Inc. .........   Washington
Fittje Bros. Printing Co., Inc.......   Colorado
Frederic Printing Company............   Colorado
Garner Publishing Company (d.b.a.
  Garner Printing)...................   Iowa
Georges & Shapiro Lithograph, Inc....   California
Geyer Printing Company, Inc..........   Pennsylvania
Gritz-Ritter Graphics, Inc. .........   Colorado
Grover Printing Company..............   Texas
Gulf Printing Company................   Texas
Heritage Graphics, Inc...............   Texas
Precision Litho, Inc. ...............   Texas
StorterChilds Printing Co., Inc......   Florida
Superb Printing Company..............   Texas
Superior Colour Graphics, Inc........   Michigan
Tewell Warren Printing Company.......   Texas
The Etheridge Company................   Michigan
The Jarvis Press, Inc. ..............   Texas
The John C. Otto Company, Inc........   Massachusetts
Theo. Davis Sons, Incorporated.......   North Carolina
Tucker Printers, Inc. ...............   Texas
Tulsa Litho Company..................   Oklahoma
Walnut Circle Press, Inc.............   North Carolina
Western Lithograph Company...........   Texas
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, James M. McNeill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ JAMES M. MCNEILL                                                                                                            |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |   |   | **James M. McNeill****Senior** **Vice** **President** **and** **Chief** **Financial** **Officer** |

Date: August 12, 2003
#### Ozias, Appellant, *v.*Renner et al., Appellees.

(No. 116

Decided June 23, 1945.)

*Messrs. Tanner é Tanner,*for appellant.

*Mr. Walter H. Earley,*for appellees.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of C. B. Renner, Harry E. Moots and Alma Moots, defendants, appellees herein, for an order dismissing the appeal for the reason and upon the ground that the judgment appealed from is not appealable on questions of law and fact and for the further reason that the appeal bond was not conditioned in accordance with the order of the Probate Court and was not approved by such court. The appeal is by the plaintiff, Clifford W. Ozias, a devisee, is designated as one on questions of law and fact and is from an order of the Probate Court of Preble equnty, Ohio, approving the sale of certain real estate. The plaintiff filed an application to set aside the sale to the defendants for the reason that the sale price was wholly inadequate. That application was denied and the sale of the property to the defendants was approved by the court. The order appealed from is not one rendered upon* the .issues raised by the pleadings. It is merely an order confirming a sale of real estate.

Decisive of this question is the case of *Eaton*v. *Robison,*47 Ohio App., 436, 192 N. E., 132, wherein the syllabus is as follows:

*165“1. The appealability of a case is determined by the pleadings, and the judgment appealed from must be one rendered upon the issues raised by the pleadings.

“2. An order confirming a receiver’s sale and distributing the proceeds thereof in a chancery case is not such a judgment as will support an appeal.”

The first branch of the motion is well taken, and the appeal on questions of law and fact will not be allowed. However, the case will be heard as an appeal on questions of law.

Section 11564, General Code, provides that whenever an appeal on questions of law and fact cannot be heard and no bill of exceptions has been filed in the cause a time will be fixed, not to exceed 30 days, for the preparation and settling of the bill of exceptions. In accordance with that section, we will grant a period of 30 days within which the plaintiff may prepare and settle a bill of exceptions. If and when a bill of exceptions is filed, the usual time will be granted to the parties for filing briefs.

As to the second branch of the motion which questions the sufficiency of the bond, since the appeal is allowable only on questions of law, any question as to the deficiency in the bond is immaterial.

This court held, in the case of *Van Almsick*v. *Van Almsick,*31 Ohio Law Abs., 396, as follows:

“Under Section 12223-22, G. C., a motion to dismiss an appeal for failure to file a bond will be denied and the appeal allowed to stand for hearing on questions of law.”

This branch of the motion is accordingly overruled.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Hornbeck, P. J., Geiger and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OurPets Company (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 of OurPets Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) |  | The financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|   |  |                                        
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------
|   | 
|By |  | /s/    JOHN G.
MURCHIE                 
|   |  | JOHN G. MURCHIE Chief Financial Officer



Dated:    March 30, 2004



This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other purpose.



45
#### WOODY v. THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY INC.

No. 596A01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 187

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 November 2001.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) TO BE FURNISHED BUT NOT FILED

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infocrossing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Zach
Lonstein and William J. McHale, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ ZACH LONSTEIN                          /s/ WILLIAM J. McHALE
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Zach Lonstein                              William J. McHale
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer       Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005                             August 9, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS )

LIABILITY LITIGATION, ) 

 )

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

 )

Joji Tajada, et al., ) MDL Docket No. 15-2641

C.A. No. CV-15-1885-PHX-DGC )

 ) 

 )

Joji Takada, et al., ) NOTICE

 ) 

 Plaintiff(s), ) 

 ) 

v. )

 )

C R Bard, Inc., et al., )

 )

 Defendant(s) )

 IN THE ABOVE MATTER, you are advised that the case listed 

above (formerly Northern District of Illinois 1:15-cv-7165) is now

consolidated with and part of MDL No. 2641 pursuant to the Transfer

Order filed September 16, 2015. Therefore, future pleadings 

pertaining to the above case will be filed in MDL-No. 2641, The 

title page of these documents should be prepared as shown 

above. 

 

September 21, 2015 BRIAN D. KARTH 

 Date DCE/Clerk of Court

 s/M. Pruneau 

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 86 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"Webinar: Safe Flight for Drones \u2013 Designing a System for Urban Air Mobility","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sjoginNOMe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/webinar-safe-flight-for-drones-designing-a-system-for-urban-air-mobility\/\">Webinar: Safe Flight for Drones \u2013 Designing a System for Urban Air Mobility<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/webinar-safe-flight-for-drones-designing-a-system-for-urban-air-mobility\/embed\/#?secret=sjoginNOMe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Webinar: Safe Flight for Drones \u2013 Designing a System for Urban Air Mobility” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sjoginNOMe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/drone-web.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":446}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lawrence Strouse,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03671-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8301 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,777
<PP&E>                                          12,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,346
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,862
<SALES>                                         11,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,087
<CGS>                                            1,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       346
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,464)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph D. Sansone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Joseph D. SansoneJoseph D. Sansone President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: May 11, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gary Tomlinson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00235-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Fears Nachawati Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/16/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 19, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 861 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, (Pub. L. 110-343), the Boise, Payette, and Sawtooth National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Tuesday November 9, 2010, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kim Pierson, Designated Federal Official, at (208) 347-0301 or e-mail                         *kpierson@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: October 29, 2010.

Suzanne C. Rainville,

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-27997 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M