alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               IMNET SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


The following computations set forth the calculations of primary and fully
diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended September 30, 1997
and 1996.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                    1997                              1996
                                                         --------------------------         -------------------------
                                                                           FULLY                             FULLY
                                                           PRIMARY        DILUTED             PRIMARY       DILUTED
                                                           EARNINGS       EARNINGS            EARNINGS      EARNINGS
                                                          PER SHARE      PER SHARE           PER SHARE     PER SHARE
                                                         -----------    -----------         -----------   -----------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>                 <C>           <C>        
Net income (loss) ....................................   $(3,147,553)   $(3,147,553)        $   646,235   $   646,235
                                                         ===========    ===========         ===========   ===========
Weighted average outstanding common
  shares .............................................     9,756,653      9,756,653           9,591,748     9,591,748
Increase due to assumed issuance of shares
  related to outstanding stock options using
  the treasury stock method ........................              --             --             406,966       406,966
                                                         -----------    -----------         -----------   -----------
Adjusted weighted average outstanding
  common shares and common share
  equivalents ......................................       9,756,653      9,756,653           9,998,714     9,998,714
                                                         ===========    ===========         ===========   ===========
Net income (loss) per common share and
common share equivalent ..............................   $     (0.32)   $     (0.32)        $      0.07   $      0.07
                                                         ===========    ===========         ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


Note: Net income (loss) per common share and common share equivalent has been
      computed based upon the weighted average outstanding common shares and
      common share equivalents during each period. Common share equivalents
      recognize the dilutive effects of outstanding options to acquire Common
      Stock.









                                    Page 16
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at March 31, 2000,  and its statement
of income for the three  months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference  to the FOrm 10q of CNL Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  for the three  months
ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,614,302
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  61,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,247
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         26,572,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,099,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,998,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,778,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,998,876
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,047,923
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                872,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            872,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   872,548
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its  industry,  CNL Income Fund XIV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### JOHN M. WOROBETZ v. RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL AND CASINO.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-163058) of eDiets.com,
Inc.,

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115372) of eDiets.com, Inc.,

(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90046) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Stock Option Plan, and

(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122763) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan;

of our report dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eDiets.com, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Ft. Lauderdale, Florida |  |                      
|March 12, 2010          |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                             297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,091
<PP&E>                                           4,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,301
<SALES>                                          7,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,535
<CGS>                                            5,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8910]


Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Delacroix's Greece on the Ruins of Missolonghi''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Delacroix's Greece on the Ruins of 
Missolonghi,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at 
the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about 
November 16, 2014, until on or about February 15, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 3, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-24143 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2057

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members

of the United States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the members in connection

with leave under the Central Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include domestic travel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2057 ES

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSPOR2 TATION COSTS INCURRED BY MEMBERS OF

3 THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ON

4 REST AND RECUPERATION LEAVE.

5 The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse a member

6 of the United States Armed Forces for transportation ex7 penses incurred by such member for one round trip by

8 such member between two locations within the United

9 States in connection with leave taken under the Central

10 Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program during

11 the period beginning on September 25, 2003, and ending

12 on December 18, 2003.

Passed the Senate March 3, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2057

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse

members of the United States Armed Forces forcertain transportation expenses incurred by themembers in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include domestic travel.
Exhibit 13.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of CryptoLogic Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: | June 29, 2009 | /s/ Brian Hadfield _______________________________ |
|-------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------|

Brian Hadfield

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

*This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.*

 

 

----
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 220

AN ACT

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of

construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 220 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

3 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section

4 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

5 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission project numbered 11214, the Commission may, at

7 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea8 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili9 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and

10 the Commission’s procedures under that section—

11 (1) reinstate the license for the construction of

12 the project as of the effective date of the surrender

13 of the license; and

14 (2) extend the time period during which the li15 censee is required to commence the construction of

16 the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond

17 the date that is 4 years after the date of issuance

18 of the license.

Passed the Senate April 7, 2003.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 220

AN ACT

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project in

the State of Illinois.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Sudan

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Sudan, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by the actions and policies of the Government of Sudan.  On April 26, 2006, in Executive Order 13400, the President determined that the conflict in Sudan's Darfur region posed an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, expanded the scope of the national emergency to deal with that threat, and ordered the blocking of property of certain persons connected to the conflict.  On October 13, 2006, the President issued Executive Order 13412 to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency and to implement the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-344).

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Sudan continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on November 3, 1997, as expanded on April 26, 2006, and with respect to which additional steps were taken on October 13, 2006, must continue in effect beyond November 3, 2010.  Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Sudan.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                        and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2010-27876

Billing code 3195-W1-P
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN RE NEW RADIO VENTURE, INC., 

doing business as KNUV 1190 AM - La 

Buena Onda (The Good Wave) and 

KNRV 1150 AM, formerly doing 

business as KNRC 1150 AM, 

 Debtor. 

 BAP No. CO-10-025 

NEW RADIO VENTURE, INC., 

Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 Bankr. No. 08-24240 

Adv. No. 09-01080 

 Chapter 11 

 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORP., also 

known as Susquehanna Radio, Inc., 

Defendant – Appellant, 

 and 

SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORP., also 

known as Susquehanna Radio, Inc., 

Third-Party-Plaintiff – 

Appellant, 

 v. 

CENTENNIAL INVESTMENT & 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., 

Third-Party-Defendant – 

Appellee. 

June 15, 2010 

 The matter before the Court is the Stipulated Agreement for Dismissal of 

Appeal Under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2) (“Motion”), filed on June 14, 2010, 

by Appellant Susquehanna Radio Corp., and Appellees New Radio Venture, Inc. 

and Centennial Investment & Management Company, Inc. The Motion requests 

that the appeal be dismissed. 

BAP Appeal No. 10-25 Docket No. 15 Filed: 06/15/2010 Page: 1 of 2
 Accordingly, it is HERBY ORDERED that: 

 (1) The Motion is GRANTED. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2); 10th 

Cir. BAP L.R. 8016-4(a)(8). 

 (2) Any deadlines previously set by the Court are VACATED. 

 (3) This appeal is DISMISSED. 

 (4) The mandate shall issue immediately. A certified copy of this 

Order shall constitute the mandate on appeal. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

BAP Appeal No. 10-25 Docket No. 15 Filed: 06/15/2010 Page: 2 of 2
#### HILL MANOR APARTMENTS v. HENRIETTA STOKES.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Sheets *v.*Peabody.

*Saturday, January*17, 1846.

On a decree of foreclosure and for a sale of the land mortgaged, the sale should he made in conformity with the statute in force when the mortgage was executed.

ERROR to the *Jefferson*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This was a bill in chancery filed in 1840 by *Peabody,*as administrator of one *Soper,*against *Sheets.*It is a bill of foreclosure, and prays a sale of the mortgaged premises situate in *Jefferson*county in this state. The mortgage was executed on the 3d of *January,*1835, and was made to secure the payment of a certain debt payable four years after date with interest. The place where the mortgage was executed is not shown. The parties submitted the cause to the Circuit Court on the bill and exhibits.

The Court, in *April,*1843, decreed that the mortgage-debt, with interest and costs, be paid within thirty days, and, in case of non-payment, that the equity of redemption be foreclosed; that the premises be sold at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, without appraisement or valuation^ first giving notice, &c.; that the rents and profits for seven years be first offered for sale; and that the officer proceed according to the statute on the subject, approved the 4th of *February,*1831.

The only objection made to this decree'is, that it requires the land to be sold without appraisement or valuation.

At the time the mortgage was executed, the statute of 1831, referred to in the decree, was in force; and if that statute governs the case, the decree is unobjectionable, no appraisement or valuation of the land being required by that *614statute. But at the time the decree was rendered, there was . a statute declaring that no property, real or personal, should be sold on execution, or by virtue of any other process, for less than its appraised value, except, &c. Stat. 1843, p. 15. If the last-named statpte is to govern, the decree is erroneous. We must presume, the contrary not appearing, that the mortgage was executed in this state. It has been decided by the Supreme Court of the *United States,*in a case like the present, that the decree as to a sale of the property must-conform to the statute in force when the mortgage was executed. *Bronson*v. *Kinzie et al.*1 Howard, 311. This decision of ^ the Supreme Court of the *United States,*whether correct or not, is obligatory on us. Should we decide contrary to it, our judgment would of course, in case of a writ of error, be reversed by that Court. We decide, therefore, that as the decree before us is in conformity with the statute in force when the mortgage was executed, it must be affirmed. We have heretofore expressed a similar opinion to the one now given. *Doe d. Wolf et al.*v. *Heath et al., May*term, 1844.

*M. G. Bright,*for the plaintiff.

*W. Lyle,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

— The decree is affirmed with 1 *per cent.*damages and costs.
#### Donald G. Gore et al., Appellants, v Giuseppe Cambareri et al., Respondents.

[789 NYS2d 304]

*651In an action to compel the determination of claims to real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.H.O.), dated November 14, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, and upon a determination that they had not obtained by adverse possession title to certain real property owned by the defendants, found that the defendants were the owners of the property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs and the defendants are the owners of adjoining properties. The plaintiffs commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that they obtained by adverse possession title to a certain area of property owned by the defendants near the border between the properties. After a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court determined that the plaintiffs had failed to prove adverse possession and determined that the defendants were the owners of the property. We affirm.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions on appeal, they failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the property at issue was protected by a substantial inclosure and/or usually cultivated or improved by them within the meaning of RPAPL 522 *(see Seisser v Eglin,*7 AD3d 505 [2004]; *Rowland v Crystal Bay Constr.,*301 AD2d 585 [2003]; *Giannone v Trotwood Corp.,*266 AD2d 430 [1999]; *Boumis v Caetano,*140 AD2d 401 [1988]; *see generally Ray v Beacon Hudson Mtn. Corp.,*88 NY2d 154 [1996]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.