alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                Exhibit 10.54.1

List of Vice Presidents who have executed officer severance agreements:


Kevin G. Aandahl                   VP, Corporate and Public Affairs
Morris L. Berger                   VP, Human Resources
Julia Bietsch                      VP, Provider Affairs
Ron Ekstrandt                      VP, Strategy
Roger R. Fischer                   VP, Information Services
Larry Glascott                     VP, Controller
Ruth Meyer Hollenback              VP, Network Management
Gary Maienschein                   VP, Government Affairs
Thomas P. Ogden                    VP, Information Services
Michael F. Patton                  VP, Marketing
Jane I. Potter                     VP, Medical Delivery Systems
Mary Lou Redshaw                   VP, Custom Accounts
Randy D. Ressel                    VP, Outstate Sales
Thomas Stoiber                     VP, Actuarial/Underwriting Services
Dennis J. Sullivan                 VP, Operations/Services
Gary Whitworth                     VP, BCBSMo Operations
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Monday through Wednesday, November 8-10, 2010, at 
the times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, November 8, 2010

9:30-Noon Public Hearing: Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility 
Guidelines for Transportation Vehicles; Proposed Rule.
1:30-5 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to Public.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

9:30-11 a.m. Planning and Evaluation Committee.
11-Noon Budget Committee.
1:30-2:30 p.m. Technical Programs Committee.
2:30-4 p.m. Frontier Issues Ad Hoc Committee.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

9:30-Noon Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to Public.
1:30-3 p.m. Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Access Board Conference 
Room, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice) and (202) 272-0082 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting scheduled on the 
afternoon of Wednesday, November 10, 2010, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items:
    <bullet> Approval of the draft July 28, 2010 meeting minutes.
    <bullet> Budget Committee Report.
    <bullet> Planning and Evaluation Committee Report.
    <bullet> Technical Programs Committee Report.
    <bullet> Ad Hoc Committee Reports.
    <bullet> Executive Director's Report.
    <bullet> ADA and ABA Guidelines; Federal Agency Updates.
    <bullet> Public Comment, Open Topics.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, computer assisted real-time transcription 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meetings and hearing. Persons attending Board meetings are requested to 
refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the 
comfort of other participants (see http://www.access-board.gov/about/policies/fragrance.htm for more information).

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-27102 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                            THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
                          COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION
                          COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN

     WHEREAS, COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION (the "COMPANY") has heretofore adopted
the COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN (the "PLAN"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows; effective as of
January 1, 2000:

     1.  The term "Board" shall be deleted from Section 2.2 of the Plan and the
phrase "Chief Executive Officer of the Company" shall be substituted therefor.

     2.  Section 2.4 of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be
substituted therefor:

          "2.4  TIME OF MAKING ELECTIONS.  Any election which may be made by a
     Participant under this Article II must be made (i) as to Base Salary, not
     later than December 31 of the calendar year preceding the calendar year
     during which the Base Salary to which such election relates is earned, and
     (ii) as to Incentive Awards, not later than June 30 of the calendar year
     during which the Incentive Award to which such election relates is earned.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, for any calendar year during which an
     employee first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, (i) elections
     as to the Participant's Base Salary must be made within 30 days of such
     employee first becoming so eligible and shall apply to the first payroll
     period following such election, and (ii) elections as to the Participant's
     Incentive Awards must be made within 30 days of such employee first
     becoming so eligible or by June 30 of such calendar year, if later, and
     shall apply to the entire Incentive Award for such calendar year; provided,
     the amount of such Incentive Award is not reasonably ascertainable at the
     time of such initial eligibility following June 1.  All elections shall be
     made in the manner and form prescribed by the Company."

     3.  As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

     EXECUTED at Houston, Texas this ___ day of __________________, 19____.

                                    COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION


                                    By:
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Name:
                                             ------------------------------
                                       Title:
                                             ------------------------------
#### Thompson and Others *v.*Fry.

Ill assumpsit against partners for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff having proved that one of the defendants had examined his (the plaintiff’s) books, containing the items of his account against the defendants, and had acknowledged them as they were stated in the books to be correct, — offered to prove said items by parol evidence, without producing the books or accounting for their absence. *Held,*that the evidence was inadmissible.

*609
      *Thursday, January*15, 1846.

APPEAL from the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court.

*Z. Baird,*for the appellants.

*G. S. Orth,*for the appellee.

Sullivan, J.

— Assumpsit by *Fry*against the appellants, as partners, for goods sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue. Verdict and judgment for. the plaintiff. On the trial of the cause, the plaintiff having proved that one of the defendants had examined the books of the plaintiff, containing the items of his account against the defendants, and had acknowledged them, as they were stated in the books, to be correct, offered to prove the items of said account by parol testimony, without producing the books or accounting forth eir absence. The defendants objected, but the Court overruled the objection and admitted the testimony. This is the only error complained of.

The defendants contend that the acknowledgment was made with reference to the particular items examined, and that, consequently, the books were the best evidence of the items so admitted, and should have been produced.

We think the defendants have taken the correct view of the case. The admission was, that the contents of the plaintiff’s books, in the particulars referred to, were correct. It is like the admission of the contents of any other writing, which can only be proved by the best evidence within the reach of the party, that is, the instrument itself, unless its absence be accounted for. The distinction between the admission of a party that he owes to another person a certain sum for goods sold and delivered, and an admission that certain *items*of an account are correct, must be made in this case. The case of *Wilt*v. *Bird, November*term, 1844, sustains the view we have taken of the case.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

# **CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

##### **PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, David M. Tehle, Chief Financial Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                         | /s/ David M.  Tehle                     |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  August 14, 2003 | David M. Tehle, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Harvey A. WagnerHarvey A. WagnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of Keith Budd, Appellant-Respondent, v Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[788 NYS2d 114]

*438Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered October 20, 2003, denying the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul respondent Police Commissioner’s termination of petitioner’s employment without a hearing, but remanding the matter to respondent Police Department for a name-clearing hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Probationary employment can be terminated without a hearing, absent a showing that the termination is in bad faith or for an impermissible reason *(Matter of Swinton v Safir,*93 NY2d 758 [1999]). Petitioner failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to his probationary status at the time of his termination. The unrefuted evidence reveals that the period of time at issue, during which petitioner was concededly absent from duty, was charged to his annual leave, not lost time, and thus extended his probationary period (Personnel Rules & Regs of City of New York [55 RCNY] Appendix A, ¶ 5.2.8 [b]). He was, however, entitled to a name-clearing hearing *(Matter of Swinton v Safir, supra),*especially in light of the fact—contrary to respondents’ position—that he did not admit the essential findings contained in his record. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Solely for
the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Warren Stowell, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Telzuit Medical Technologies, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof:



|1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Warren Stowell                   
|Warren Stowell                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|October 2, 2007
#### KEVIN E. HILL v. ROBERT L. HILL and BOB HILL ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 236A01

(Filed 9 November 2001)

Gifts— sufficient evidence of gift—malicious prosecution— abuse of process

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that plaintiffs evidence was sufficient for the jury to find that defendant father gifted a business and all of its assets to plaintiff son and to support submission to the jury of plaintiffs claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process; therefore, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of defendants’ remaining assignments of error.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 142 N.C. App. 524, 545 S.E.2d 442 (2001), reversing a judgment entered 28 September 1999 and an amended judgment entered 12 November 1999 by Tilghman, J., in Superior Court, Carteret County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 October 2001.

*Wheatly, Wheatly, Nobles & Weeks, P.A., by C.R. Wheatly, Jr., and Stevenson L. Weeks, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Mason & Mason, P.A., by L. Patten Mason, and Ward and Smith, PA., by Kenneth R. Wooten, for defendant-appellees.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in section one of the dissenting opinion by Judge Tyson, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to that court to address defendants’ remaining assignments of error.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.                           May 1, 2006
---------------------------                           -----------
Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.                                   Date
Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS                     EXHIBIT 99.2

<Table>
<Caption>
                                    BEGINNING          ACQUISITION         CHARGES TO                            ENDING
       DESCRIPTION                   BALANCE            RESERVES             EXPENSE             DEDUCTIONS      BALANCE
--------------------------          ---------          -----------         -----------          -----------    ----------
<S>                                 <C>                <C>                 <C>                  <C>            <C>

2000 Restructuring Reserve                 $-            $973,000            $586,000            ($487,000)    $1,072,000

2001 Restructuring Reserve          1,072,000             136,000           2,002,000           (3,048,000)       162,000
</Table>

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                    TRANSFERS FROM
                                        BALANCE AT           PROVISION CHARGED       ACQUISITIONS                       BALANCE AT
        DESCRIPTION                BEGINNING OF PERIOD          TO EXPENSE         AND DIVESTITURES   CHARGE-OFFS     END OF PERIOD
---------------------------        -------------------       -----------------     ----------------   -----------     -------------
<S>                                <C>                       <C>                    <C>               <C>             <C>
1999 Allowance for doubtful
accounts                                  $10,000                 $25,000              $276,750        ($69,000)        $242,750

2000 Allowance for doubtful
accounts                                  242,750                 579,590                58,601        (239,494)         641,447

2001 Allowance for doubtful
accounts                                  641,447                  10,572               (70,640)       (206,177)         375,202
</Table>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2200

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) 

to the products of Laos. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 

relations treatment) to the products of Laos.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS TO 

4 LAOS. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

6 (1) the Lao People’s Democratic Republic is 

7 pursuing a broad policy of adopting market-based 

8 reforms to enhance its economic competitiveness and 

9 achieve an attractive climate for investment; 
2

•S 2200 IS 

1 (2) extension of normal trade relations treat2 ment would assist the Lao People’s Democratic Re3 public in developing its economy based on free mar4 ket principles and becoming competitive in the global 

5 marketplace; 

6 (3) establishing normal commercial relations on 

7 a reciprocal basis with the Lao People’s Democratic 

8 Republic will promote United States exports to the 

9 rapidly growing southeast Asian region and expand 

10 opportunities for United States business and invest11 ment in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic econ12 omy; 

13 (4) United States and Laotian commercial in14 terests would benefit from the bilateral trade agree15 ment between the United States and the Lao Peo16 ple’s Democratic Republic, signed in 2003, providing 

17 for market access and the protection of intellectual 

18 property rights; 

19 (5) the Lao People’s Democratic Republic has 

20 taken cooperative steps with the United States in 

21 the global war on terrorism, combating the traf22 ficking of narcotics, and the accounting for Amer23 ican servicemen and civilians still missing from the 

24 Vietnam war; and 
3

•S 2200 IS 

1 (6) expanding bilateral trade relations that in2 clude a commercial agreement may promote further 

3 progress by the Lao People’s Democratic Republic 

4 on human rights, religious tolerance, democratic 

5 rule, and transparency, and assist that country in 

6 adopting regional and world trading rules and prin7 ciples. 

8 (b) EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREAT9 MENT TO THE PRODUCTS OF THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMO10 CRATIC REPUBLIC.— 

11 (1) HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE AMEND12 MENT.—General note 3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff 

13 Schedule of the United States is amended by strik14 ing ‘‘Laos’’. 

15 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

16 by paragraph (1) applies with respect to goods en17 tered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consump18 tion, on or after the effective date of a notice pub19 lished in the Federal Register by the United States 

20 Trade Representative that a trade agreement obli21 gating reciprocal most-favored-nation treatment be22 tween the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and the 

23 United States has entered into force.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David C. Owen, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of ICOP Digital, Inc.;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
|                    |                                    |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/  DAVID C. OWEN                      |
|                    | David  C. Owen                          |
|                    | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    | * *                                |
| Date: June 9, 2005 | * *                                |

 

----