alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                      3,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,180
<PP&E>                                           7,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,567
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,903
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,740)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,964
<SALES>                                         14,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,411
<CGS>                                            5,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:           March 25, 2011 |  /s/ Huw Spiers                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                        |  Huw Spiers                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                                                                                        |  Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,020,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,196,678
<PP&E>                                       1,383,620
<DEPRECIATION>                               (534,811)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,219,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,029,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    857,945
<COMMON>                                       104,139
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,118,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,219,378
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,312,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               348,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,807,977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,807,977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,807,977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996.                     
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      12,102,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  913,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,205
<INVENTORY>                                    746,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,797,831
<PP&E>                                       6,753,734
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,314,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,465,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,483,542
<BONDS>                                      2,933,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       18,087,836
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           414
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,039,983)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,465,043
<SALES>                                      1,005,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,013,401
<CGS>                                        1,310,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,808,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (676,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (676,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (676,365)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, 

 Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY; GINA 

MCCARTHY, 

 Respondents,

------------------------------

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW 

MEXICO, 

Intervenor.

THE NAVAJO NATION; AMERICAN 

COALITION FOR CLEAN COAL 

ELECTRICITY; PACIFICORP; UTILITY 

AIR REGULATORY GROUP, 

 Amici Curiae.

No. 11-9552

(EPA No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0846)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before TYMKOVICH, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before the court on the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, which we 

have construed as a voluntary motion to dismiss. Upon consideration, the motion is 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 3, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 11-9552 Document: 01019469764 Date Filed: 08/03/2015 Page: 1 
2

granted, and this petition for review is dismissed. The responses due on August 12, 2015 

shall be filed in numbers 11-9557 and 11-9567 only. 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 11-9552 Document: 01019469764 Date Filed: 08/03/2015 Page: 2
#### In the Matter of Befe Reid, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 917]

*951Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered January 6, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit interference with an employee, refusing a direct order and inappropriate sexual behavior after the instructor in his class noticed that petitioner had his hand under his shirt tail and was masturbating. Notwithstanding petitioner’s defense that the instructor had fabricated the misbehavior report in retaliation for refusing to agree to kill the instructor’s husband, petitioner was found guilty of interfering with an employee and a sex offense at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding claiming that his due process rights were violated by a portion of the instructor’s testimony being taken out of his presence. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Inasmuch as the hearing transcript reveals that petitioner failed to object to a portion of the instructor’s testimony being kept confidential, petitioner has failed to preserve this issue for our review *(see Matter of Campanale v Coughlin,*214 AD2d 902, 904 [1995]). In any event, the record clearly establishes that for security reasons petitioner was properly excluded from being present for the testimony pertaining to the instructor’s personal information about herself and her family *(see*7 NYCRR 254.5; *see also Matter of Laureano v Kuhlmann,*75 NY2d 141, 147 [1990]; *Matter of Scott v Coombe,*228 AD2d 996, 997 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 801 [1996]). Petitioner’s remaining contention that he was denied the right to call a witness was not raised in his petition and, therefore, will not be considered on this appeal *(see Matter of Berrian v Coughlin,*222 AD2d 990, 991 [1995]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

 

Securities andExchange Commission

Washington, DC

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of ICOP Digital, Inc.on Form S-8 (No. 333-121219) of our report dated March 11, 2004,except as to notes 1, 7, 10 and 11, which are dated June 21, 2005 appearing inthe Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A-5for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/  Cordovano and Honeck, LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Denver,  Colorado              |
| July 7,  2005                  |

 

----
#### Transportation Consultants of America, Inc., Doing Business as Quality Transportation, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v American Home Assurance Company, Appellant, and Albiez Insurance Agency, Inc., Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 90]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered October 10, 2003, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $481,891.25 against defendant American Home Assurance, but dismissing the case as against defendant Albiez Insurance Agency, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of the vice-president of Citicorp North America established that plaintiff lost a bag containing checks endorsed by the bank’s customers, which had already been accepted for deposit and credited to the customer accounts, and thus were no longer negotiable instruments since the items had been transferred to Citicorp for collection *(see*UCC 3-104 [1] [c]; 4-105 [a], [d]). The sole reason advanced by American Home for withdrawing its defense of plaintiff in the underlying Citicorp action was that the lost bag contained negotiable instruments that were excluded from coverage under a provision in the policy. The affidavit confirmed the impropriety of that denial of coverage. There is no merit to American Home’s argument that the checks were negotiable. That a finder of the checks or a thief might ultimately have been able to negotiate them is of no moment, since the question of negotiability is determined at the time of the loss, at which point—having been accepted for deposit by Citicorp and still in its constructive possession on their way to the processing center—the checks were clearly nonnegotiable.

Following American Home’s withdrawal of a defense to *386Citicorp’s underlying action, plaintiff entered into a reasonable settlement with Citicorp for slightly less than the loss Citicorp actually sustained as a result of not being able to recover from the payor banks. American Home’s argument that a valuation provision in the policy limited its liability for the loss was properly rejected *(see Ansonia Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.,*257 AD2d 84 [1999]).

Inasmuch as American Home’s denial of coverage was unjustified, plaintiffs claims against its insurance broker, Albiez, are academic. The court was not required to address the merits of Albiez’s cross motion seeking dismissal of the claims against it. We affirm that judgment of dismissal solely on the ground that Albiez could not be held liable for procuring an allegedly inadequate insurance policy where the policy did indeed cover the loss at issue. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0098]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Evaluation of Potential Data Sources for the Sentinel Initiative” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3794,                         *Jonnalynn.capezzuto@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 4, 2009 (74 FR 45858), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0657. The approval expires on February 28, 2013. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: October 25, 2010.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-27848 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,292)
<INVENTORY>                                     17,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,189
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,185
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,285
<SALES>                                        120,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,725
<CGS>                                           38,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,339,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,127,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,127,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,127,327)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)




</TABLE>
#### CITY OF NEWARK v. ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION.

June 21, 1978.

Cross-Petition for certification denied. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*586)
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET

                                                                  June 30, 2004
ASSETS

Current assets:                                                     -
Total current assets                                              -


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - related party                          8,215

Total current liabilities                                         8,215

Stockholder's equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value,
25,000,000 shares authorized,
4,500,000 shares issued and
outstanding as of 06/30/04                                   4,500
Additional paid-in capital                                          75
(Deficit) accumulated during
development stage                                           (12,790)
                                                                       (8,2157)
                                                                       $    -

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Owen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    David C. Owen                
|David C. Owen                       
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|March 19, 2010
#### HENRY P. MC DONALD & BARBARA MC DONALD v. JOSEPH S. MIANECKI & DELORES MIANECKI.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 159 *N. J. Super.*1)