alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



M & F BANCORP, INC.



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                               
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2005 |  | /s/ Lee Johnson, Jr.          
|                      |  | Lee Johnson, Jr.              
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|                      | 
|Dated: March 30, 2005 |  | /s/ Allan E. Sturges          
|                      |  | Allan E. Sturges              
|                      |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer

---

|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



53
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. McNeill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JAMES M. MCNEILLJames M. McNeill Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 9, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                      PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                  NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            PRIMARY                       FULLY DILUTED
                                             ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                                                   1997              1996             1997              1996
                                             -----------------  ---------------  ---------------  ----------------
<S>                                          <C>                <C>              <C>              <C>
Weighted average common stock
   outstanding during the period...........     6,252,836         5,891,727        6,252,836         6,074,550 
Options and warrants.......................       181,600           361,431          185,176           369,714
                                                ---------         ---------        ---------         --------- 
                                            
Total......................................     6,434,436         6,253,158        6,438,012         6,444,264
                                                =========         =========        =========         ========= 
                                                             
Net income attributable to                  
  common and common equivalent shares:                                     
   Net Income..............................    $5,228,415        $3,466,359       $5,228,415        $3,466,359
   Less accretion on redeemable preferred                                                                    
    stock..................................             -            10,162                -            10,162 
   Less preferred stock dividend...........             -            85,750                -            85,750 
                                               ----------        ----------       ----------        ---------- 
Net income attributable to common and         
    common equivalent shares...............    $5,228,415        $3,370,447       $5,228,415        $3,370,447
                                               ==========        ==========       ==========        ==========
Net income per common and common              
    equivalent share.......................    $     0.81        $     0.54       $     0.81        $     0.52 
                                               ==========        ==========       ==========        ==========  
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1721222
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2281744
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54272123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35330605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54272123
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9336477
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6419212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1068208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1849057
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1849057
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1849057
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0



</TABLE>
SIXTH ALLONGE
 TO
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 FROM
 HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
 AND
 REAGENTS APPLICATIONS, INC.
 PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF TIFUNDING LLC
 IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
 $1,000,000
 DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2002
 (the “Promissory Note”)
  Recitals
  A.TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acquired all of the right, title and interest in and to the Promissory Note from Bay Bank, FSB effective February 7, 2011.
  B.The make and the holder now desire to make certain revisions to the Promissory Note.
  WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND HOLDER, the Promissory Note identified in the caption above is hereby amended as follows.
  1.Bank. “Bank” shall mean TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
  2.Maturity Date. “Maturity Date” shall mean February 28, 2012, subject to acceleration as provided in the Promissory Note.
  3.Principal Amount. The maximum principal sum available under the Promissory Note shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).
  4.Interest Rate. Section 2 of the Promissory Note is hereby deleted and superseded in its entirety by the following: “2.Interest Rate. Interest on all advances outstanding from time to time shall accrue at the annual compounded rate of nine percent (9%).”
  5.Interpretation.The Promissory Note shall be read, interpreted and construed to give effect to the terms of the Sections above, which shall supersede and control any contradictory or conflicting terms in the original Promissory Note.
  6.Effect of Allonge.Except for the change of terms set forth in the Sections above, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect.  This Allonge shall not extinguish, terminate, affect, nor impair the Borrower’s obligations under the Promissory Note, and shall not extinguish, terminate, impair or otherwise affect the lien and security interest created under the Loan Documents.  All terms used in this Allonge not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to those terms in the Promissory Note.  This Allonge forms an integral part of the Promissory Note to which it is attached and made a part of, and the two shall be read together as one instrument.
  Executed effective as of the 7th day of February, 2011.
  HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
 
 By: /s/Catherine M. Davidson
 Name:  Catherine M. Davidson
 Title:   Controller
 
 TIFUNDING LLC
 
 By: /s/ L.T. Shaw
 Name:  L. T. Shaw
 Title: Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Brunjes, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 897]

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.) rendered October 10, 2002, under indictment No. 2371/01, convicting him of rape in the first degree, rape in the third degree, assault in the second degree, robbery in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon his plea of guilty, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered October 10, 2002, under Superior Court Information No. 1555/ 02, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree, and sodomy in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly vacated the defendant’s original pleas of guilty *(see People v Jennings,*192 AD2d 885, 887 [1993]; *see also People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227, 240 [1974], *cert denied*419 US 1122 [1975]; *People v Schultz,*73 NY2d 757, 758 [1988]; *cf. People v Rubendall,*4 AD3d 13 [2004]; *People v Searcy,*2 AD3d 1395 [2003]; *Matter of Randolph v Leff,*220 AD2d 281 [1995]). The County Court first vacated the original pleas of guilty, pleas that had been premised on the anticipated imposition of sentences that were later determined by the County Court to be unduly lenient, and thereafter offered the defendant an opportunity to have those pleas reinstated in return for the promised imposition of more severe sentences deemed by the County Court to be more appropriate *(see People v Selikoff, supra; see also People v Schultz, supra).*The defendant voluntarily accepted the offer. The defendant pleaded guilty and waived his right to appeal. The court then imposed enhanced sentences.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his argument that the sentences ultimately imposed on him as part of his second plea agreement were excessive *(People v*
      *620
      *Felipe,*309 AD2d 514 [2003]; *People v Broschart,*301 AD2d 658 [2003]). The sentences imposed were not illegal. H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          54,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (736)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,853
<PP&E>                                           2,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (555)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,751
<SALES>                                        125,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,212
<CGS>                                           81,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (17,403)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,234
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-81610, 333-66128, 333-63364 and 333-56588) and
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43550 and 333-51928) of Newtek Capital, Inc. (now Newtek
Business Services, Inc.) of our report dated February 28, 2003 related to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statements.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New York, New York
March 31, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors
BSD Software,  Inc.

We consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  of our  Report of  Independent
Registered  Public  Accounting Firm dated September 28, 2005 on the consolidated
balance sheet as of July 31, 2005,  and the related  consolidated  statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows, and shareholders' deficit for the
year ended July 31, 2005, included in this Form 10-KSB.

/s/ STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.
------------------------------

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Irvine, California
December 22, 2005
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

John C. Stennis Space Center

50 YEARS

Serving as NASA’s 

Primary Rocket 

Propulsion Test Center 

providing world-class 

testing services

SURROUNDED BY A

125,000 acre Acoustical Buffer Zone

Enabling maximum flexibility for operations at Stennis, free from 

restrictions and encroachment from surrounding communities.

HOME TO

40+

Federal, State, Academic 

& Commercial 

tenants and a growing 

workforce of over 

5,000 people.

TRANSPORTATION

n Interstate access to I-10 (E-W) and I-59 (N-S)

n Stennis International Airport located at the boundary 

of the buffer zone

n A 7 1/2 -mile canal system connects to the Gulf of 

Mexico and connected waterways allowing barge 

transportation

n Two major commercial airports within 50-mile radius 

– New Orleans and Gulfport

n Five major ports located within 100-mile radius

n Two major rail lines located within 20-mile radius

Don Beckmeyer, Strategic Business Development 

don.h.beckmeyer@nasa.gov / 228.688.3788 

www.nasa.gov/stennis

Visit NASAStennis on:

125,000 Acre

Acoustical Buffer Zone

Stennis 

International 

Airport
Flexible Business Models:

l Traditional Government

– NASA provides full suite of services

l Commercial

– Tailored range of services to match 

 partner needs

l Real Estate

– Greenfield development of purpose-

 built facilities (including test facilities) 

 owned and operated by partner

Flexible Partnership Options:

l Space Act Agreement (SAA)

l Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) Agreement

l Commercial Space Launch Agreement 

 (CSLA)

l Short-term/long-term options available

DOING BUSINESS 

WITH STENNIS

Test Complex:

l Underutilized capability including existing 

 test stands and partially completed test

 sites

l In-house expertise in propulsion testing

l On-site service contracts for facilities, 

 technical services and test commodities

l Regional skilled workforce

Greenfield Development:

l 10-200+ acre plots available for new 

 construction

l Variety of location options, both centrally 

 and remotely located

Stennis is located within a regional 

high-tech corridor, including:

l Airbus l Chevron

l Northrup Grumman l Shell

l Rolls-Royce l Boeing

l Aerojet Rocketdyne l Textron

l Lockheed Martin l GE Aviation

Demographics:

 Radius Population Labor Force

30 miles 360,999 170,799

60 miles 1,806,015 883,605

90 miles 3,152,847 1,530,865

WHAT WE HAVE TO OFFER

Stennis is located on the busy 

I-10 corridor in south Mississippi, 

45 miles from New Orleans, LA, 

and 40 miles from Gulfport, MS

Map Date © 2016 Google
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|           | /s/ JOHN C. GARRISON                         |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------|
|           | John C. Garrison                             |
|           | *Principal Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|           |                                         |
| April 4,  2005 |                                         |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ICOP Digital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN DEL MAURO.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Biography

Image Credit: NASA / Aubrey Gemignani

Cheryl Quinn is the deputy director for the Airspace Operations and Safety Program 

(AOSP) within ARMD at NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC. In collaboration with 

the program director, Quinn supports the overall planning, management and evaluation of 

NASA’s aviation operations and safety research portfolio across four research centers. 

AOSP works with the Federal Aviation Administration, and industry and academic 

partners, to conceive and develop Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) 

technologies that will further improve the safety of current and future aircraft moving 

through the National Airspace System. NextGen activity includes research to enable 

service oriented architecture and integrated demand management operational efficiencies 

in the surface, terminal, en route, and oceanic operational domains for traditional aircraft, 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), and future autonomous systems. 

AOSP is also responsible for aviation safety research in the areas of aircraft state awareness, 

prevention of aircraft loss of control, verification and validation of complex systems, prog-

nostic safety through data mining, and real-time system-wide safety assurance. A key focus 

is on developing and demonstrating enhanced systems that will enable routine access to 

the airspace by emergent users of UAS, especially in support of evolving urban air mobility 

concepts.

Quinn was previously the NASA Ames Research Center, and then ARMD, representative 

to NASA’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) office. She has also served as the 

associate director for aeronautics at Ames.

Quinn began her NASA career at Ames conducting air traffic management research. She 

has served in project management positions within ARMD’s former Airspace Systems 

Program including project planning lead and deputy project manager for the Efficient 

Flight Path Management project, and as manager for terminal and surface systems and 

operations under the Advanced Air Transportation Technologies project. 

Quinn holds a degree from Stanford University.

Ms. Cheryl M. Quinn

Deputy Director, Airspace Operations and Safety Program (AOSP)

NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD)