alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Aviation Upgrade Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Torbjorn B. Lundqvist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




                                           /s/ Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           January 10, 2006





                                       33
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00179

- CV

Molly Spence , Appellant

v.

Matthew Davis , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

MOD IFIED IN PART, AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

–

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on January 10, 2022 . Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the C ourt modifies the

trial cour t’s order by deleting the wor ds “ and conti guous counties ” from the first of the Ex clusive

R ights of Matthew Davi s listed on page 4 of the order . The Court affirms the order as modified.

The appellant shall pay all costs relating t o this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (Commission File Numbers 333-12156, 333-13818, 333-105213, 333-114668, 333-135218, 333-161796 333-166673 and 333-166674) pertaining to the Radware Ltd. 1997 Key Employee Share Incentive Plan and the Radware Ltd. 2010 Employee Share Purchase Plan, of our report dated March 24, 2011, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Radware Ltd. and its subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Radware Ltd. and its subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererTel - Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER  GABBAY & KASIERERMarch 24, 2011
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Koji Sato, certify
that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as previously amended
by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A and as further amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Koji SatoKoji SatoChief Executive Officer, Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation




---

CERTIFICATIONS I, Yoichi Miyazaki, certify that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as previously amended
by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A and as further amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Yoichi MiyazakiYoichi MiyazakiChief Financial Officer, Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6204-6205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed--Correction

    The Commission hereby gives notice of a correction in the Title of 
the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested 
parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#720600131617131c131e0b011b0132141f115c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eeaecfffafbfff0fff2e7edf7eddef8f3fdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201118-002.
    Title: Lease and Operating Agreement between Philadelphia Regional 
Port Authority and Penn Warehousing & Distribution, Inc.
    Parties: Philadelphia Regional Port Authority and Penn Warehousing 
and Distribution, Inc.
    Filing Party: Paul D. Coleman, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 
Connecticut Ave., NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment defines the lease year, clarifies the 
dockage fee, allows a credit to the Lessee if dockage fees collected 
reach a certain level, and makes other miscellaneous changes.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.


[[Page 6205]]


    Dated: February 3, 2010.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2705 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"Apollo 11\u2019s Return to Earth Rooted in Aeronautics Research","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5rX043KsC1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/apollo-11s-return-to-earth-rooted-in-aeronautics-research\/\">Apollo 11\u2019s Return to Earth Rooted in Aeronautics Research<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/apollo-11s-return-to-earth-rooted-in-aeronautics-research\/embed\/#?secret=5rX043KsC1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 11\u2019s Return to Earth Rooted in Aeronautics Research” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5rX043KsC1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/apollo11-command-module-gpn-2000-001212-4x3-2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":451}
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Christopher C. JureyChristopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 11, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of two vessels whose property and interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 CFR part 515.

# DATES:

The unblocking and removal from the list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) of the two vessels identified in this notice whose property and interests in property were blocked pursuant to Cuban Assets Control Regulations, is effective on September 30, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Assistant Director, Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Washington, DC 20220, Tel: (202) 622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic and Facsimile Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC is available from OFAC's Web site (                    *www.treasury.gov/​ofac*). Certain general information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is also available via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, tel.: 202/622-0077.                

## Background

On September 30, 2014, the Director of OFAC removed from the SDN List the two vessels listed below, whose property and interests in property were blocked pursuant to Cuban Assets Control Regulations:

### Vessels

1. EAST ISLANDS (C4QB) General Cargo 15,120DWT 8,996GRT Cyprus flag (EAST ISLAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. (SDN)) (vessel) [CUBA].

2. SOUTH ISLANDS (C4AN) General Cargo 15,147DWT 8,996GRT Cyprus flag (SOUTH ISLAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. (SDN)) (vessel) [CUBA].

Dated: September 30, 2014.

John Smith,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

[FR Doc. 2014-24055 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
June 2 0 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EDWARD PAUL CELESTIN E , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00248

- CV V.

COURTYARD OF THREE F OUNTAINS ASSOCIAT ION AND KRJ

MANAGEMENT, INC. , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on February 28, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we or der the appeal DISMISSED

. We order this decision certified below for observance.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

LODEWIJK VAN DEN BERG (PH.D.)

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

PERSONAL DATA: Born March 24, 1932, in Sluiskil, The Netherlands. Married,

with two children. He is a U.S. Citizen.

EDUCATION: Received a master of science in chemical engineering from Technical

University, Delft, The Netherlands, in 1961; a master of science in applied science

from the University of Delaware in 1972; and a doctor of philosophy in applied

science from the University of Delaware in 1975.

ORGANIZATIONS: American Association of Crystal Growth, American Institute of

Aeronautics and Astronautics.

EXPERIENCE: Dr. van den Berg has over 20 years of research and management

experience in preparation of crystalline materials, in particular, growth of single crystals of chemical compounds and

investigation of associated defect chemistry and electronic properties. After van den Berg completed his Ph.D., he

joined EG&G Corporation in Goleta, California, where he is responsible for the operation of a crystal growing facility.

This facility produces various kinds of crystals via vapor transport methods. Dr. van den Berg is a co-investigator on the

Spacelab-3 mission Vapor Crystal Growth System (VCGS) experiment. In that capacity, he is responsible for the crystal

growth aspects of the VCGS experiment. Dr. van den Berg has intimate knowledge of VCGS and Fluid Experiment

System (FES) hardware and has participated in all major design and science reviews of those sytems. He has broad

experience in crystal growth and characterization including vapor transport, solution and melt growth techniques. He is

an international Authority on vapor growth techniques with emphasis on mercuric iodide crystals and its application in

the nuclear industry as gamma ray detectors.

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE: Dr. van den Berg flew on STS-51B Challenger (April 29-May 6, 1985). STS-51B,

the Spacelab-3 mission, was launched from Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and returned to land at Edwards Air Force

Base, California. It was the first operational Spacelab mission. The seven-man crew aboard Challenger conducted

investigations in crystal growth, drop dynamics leading to containerless material processing, atmospheric trace gas

spectroscopy, solar and planetary atmospheric simulation, cosmic rays, laboratory animals and human medical

monitoring. At mission conclusion, Dr. van den Berg had traveled over 2.9 million miles in 110 Earth orbits, and logged

over 168 hours in space.

MAY 1985

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.
#### PATRICIA EYRICH v. CONNY H. DAM AND ROBERT EARL D/B/A ROBERTS BROS. CIRCUS.

April 10, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*244)
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-156881) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-156882 and 333-53600) of our report dated March 16, 2011, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, which report is included in MutualFirst Financial, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.







/s/ BKD, LLP




Indianapolis, Indiana




March 16, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 203 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 203

    To open certain withdrawn land in Big Horn County, Wyoming, to 
          locatable mineral development for bentonite mining.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2003

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To open certain withdrawn land in Big Horn County, Wyoming, to 
          locatable mineral development for bentonite mining.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPENING OF CERTAIN WITHDRAWN LAND IN WYOMING TO LOCATABLE 
              MINERAL DEVELOPMENT FOR BENTONITE MINING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law and 
subject to subsection (c), the land described in subsection (b) shall 
be open to locatable mineral development for bentonite mining.
    (b) Covered Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
approximately 40 acres of previously withdrawn land located in Big Horn 
County, Wyoming, at the sixth principal meridian, T. 56 N., R. 95 W., 
Sec. 32. E\1/2\E\1/2\SE\1/4\, adjacent to Pit No. 144L covered by State 
of Wyoming Mining Permit No. 321C.
    (c) Closure.--The Secretary of the Army may close the land opened 
by subsection (a) at any time if the Secretary determines that the 
closure of the land is required by reason of a national emergency or 
for the purpose of national defense or security.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALAN GRECCO.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*133)
#### In the Matter of Scott D'Esposito, Respondent, v Noel Francine Kepler, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 169]

*510In a child custody proceeding, Noel Francine Kepler appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Anixiadis, R), dated July 16, 2003, as granted the petitioner’s motion seeking custody of the parties’ child to the extent that it directed her to return to New York City with the child and prohibited either party from removing the child from the State of New York without prior written and notarized consent of the other party and/or the court’s permission.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision prohibiting either party from removing the child from the State of New York without the prior written and notarized consent of the other party and/or the court’s permission and substituting therefor a provision prohibiting either party from removing the residence of the child from the State of New York without the prior written consent of the other party or the permission of the court; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

The Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in admitting into evidence the report of the neutral forensic psychologist, since the report was not submitted under oath *(see*22 NYCRR 202.16 [g] [2]) and relied on information other than that upon which an expert may properly base an opinion *(see Jemmott v Lazofsky,*5 AD3d 558 [2004]; *Wagman v Bradshaw,*292 AD2d 84, 86-87 [2002]). Nevertheless, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in requiring that the residence of the subject child, who had been relocated by the appellant to California, be returned to New York. The fact that the respondent’s paternity was not established until after the relocation does not affect the standard to be applied to the court’s determination. That standard, which requires consideration of “all of the factors that may be relevant to the determination” as to whether the “proposed relocation would serve the child’s best interests” *(Matter of Tropea v Tropea,*87 NY2d 727, 740-741 [1996]), was properly applied here. Even without considering the expert’s report and testimony *(see Matter of Chambers v Bruce,*292 AD2d 525 [2002]; *Murtari v Murtari, 249*AD2d 960 [1998]), there was a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court’s determination which, therefore, should not be disturbed *(see Klat v Klat,*176 AD2d 922, 923 [1991]; *Matter of Coyne v Coyne, 150*AD2d 573, 574 [1989]).

However, it is necessary to the court’s purpose of maintaining the respondent’s role in the child’s life only that the child *reside*
      *511in the state, not that she be forbidden to *leave*the state. Thus, the Family Court’s order was unduly restrictive to the extent that it forbade the parties from taking the child out of the state without consent or court approval. Luciano, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.