alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Green Light for Green Flight: NASA’s Contributions to Environmentally Responsible Aviation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"B71L8NldNo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/green-light-for-green-flight-nasas-contributions-to-environmentally-responsible-aviation\/\">Green Light for Green Flight: NASA’s Contributions to Environmentally Responsible Aviation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/green-light-for-green-flight-nasas-contributions-to-environmentally-responsible-aviation\/embed\/#?secret=B71L8NldNo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Green Light for Green Flight: NASA’s Contributions to Environmentally Responsible Aviation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"B71L8NldNo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/green_flight_front-w-logo.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":912}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FRESH
CHOICE INC'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-16-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-07-1997
<CASH>                                           5,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,359
<PP&E>                                          43,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,115
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,679
<SALES>                                         18,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,334
<CGS>                                            4,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (35)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

April 4, 2018 

t0328 

Order 

 

Clerk 

April 4, 2018 

156459 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156459 

 COA: 332414 

Ingham CC: 15-000411-FC 

DASHAWN MARTISE CARTER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cause No. DC-14-03547

JGMS INVESTMENTS LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

§

Plaintiff §

§

Vs. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

§

NANCY JEAN PETTERSON §

§

Defendant § 44 th DISTRICT COURT

NANCY JEAN PETTERSON

Vs

JGMS INVESTMENTS LLC and

EL COPPELL LLC

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW NANCY PETTERSON, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, and files this her Notice

of Appeal of the final judgment, rendered on September 4, 2015, to the 5 th Court of Appeals,

Dallas, Texas.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH S. HARTER

/s/ Kenneth S. Harter

Kenneth S. Harter

State Bar ID 09155300 ACCEPTED

05-15-01286-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

10/26/2015 5:47:27 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERKJGMS vs. Petterson

- - Notice of Appeal pg. 2 1620 E. Beltline Rd.

Carrollton, Tx. 75006

(972) 242

- 8887

FAX (972) 446

- 7976

kenharter@tx.rr.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on counsel via the Court’s e

filing system on this the 21st day of October , 2015.

/s/ Kenneth S. Harter

Kenneth S. Harter
Exhibit 10.4.28
 SALARY AND BONUS ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND TERMS OF FISCAL
2010 BONUS PLANS
   Executive Officer
    

    Base Salary



    Target Bonus AmountKimberly Till (President and CEO)
    
$
    600,000
    

$
    600,000Robert Cox (EVP, CFO and Treasurer)
    
$
    305,000
    

$
    152,500George Terhanian (President, Global Solutions)
    
$
    300,000
    

$
    100,000Enzo Micali (Global EVP, Operations and Technology)
    
$
    295,000
    

$
    118,000Frank Forkin (President, North America Client Services)
    
$
    275,000
    

$
    110,000Robert Salvoni (Managing Director, Europe)
    

    160,000 (GBP)


    64,000 (GBP)Patti Hoffman (Interim Head of Human Resources)
    
$
    228,000
    

    N/AEric Narowski (Principal Accounting Officer
and SVP, Global Controller)
    
$
    174,300
    

$
    34,000
#### Robin Levenherz, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Lee Povinelli et al., Defendants, and American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation, Respondent.

[789 NYS2d 295]

In an action, inter alia, to rescind an annuity contract and to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff Robin Levenherz, individually and as trustee of the Robin Bett Levenherz Irrevocable Trust, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered July 25, 2003, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendant American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) which were to dismiss the sixth and seventh causes of action asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, those branches of the motion of the defendant American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation which were to dismiss the sixth and seventh causes of action asserted against it are denied, and those causes of action are reinstated.

The appellant contends that Lee Povinelli, acting as agent for American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (hereinafter Skandia), procured an annuity contract for her from Skandia in violation of provisions of the Insurance Law. She further alleges that she did not see or sign relevant documents upon which her signature was forged. The sixth cause of action alleges that Skandia violated “statutory, regulatory and common law obligations for the sale” of its annuity, including selling the product in New York without a license to do so, failure to deliver the contract or any relevant prospectus, and failure to give proper notice of the “free look” period which exists after delivery of the contract. The seventh cause of action alleges that Skandia was liable, inter alia, for the actions of the defendant Povinelli “for its own failure to maintain and enforce a reasonably adequate system of internal supervision and control over” Povinelli.

On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211, a plaintiff is accorded “ ‘the benefit of every possible favorable inference’ ” *(Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002], quoting *Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). A motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] *659[1]) “may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiffs factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” *(Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., supra*at 326).

There is no documentary evidence in the record that Povinelli was not an agent for Skandia. Moreover, the plaintiffs allege fraudulent conduct which may constitute a basis for granting relief *(see CPC Intl. v McKesson Corp.,*70 NY2d 268 [1987]; *Brenkus v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*309 AD2d 1260 [2003]).

In view of the foregoing, the plaintiffs’ sixth and seventh causes of action asserted against Skandia should not have been dismissed. Goldstein, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holly A. Poquette, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/    Holly A. PoquetteHolly A. Poquette, Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 14, 2009
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Steven R. Roth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Rudolph Technologies, Inc.








Date: February 25, 2011








By:/s/  STEVEN R. ROTHSteven R. RothSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT  32.1  &  32.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Senticore, Inc. (the
"Company")  for  the  year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay Patel, Chief
Executive  Officer,  and Carl Gessner, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Jay  Patel
---------------
Jay  Patel
Chief  Executive  Officer

April  28,  2004



/s/  Carl  Gessner
------------------
Carl  Gessner
President,  Secretary,  Treasurer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer

April  28,  2004

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2123

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                           State of Arkansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2004

 Mrs. Lincoln (for herself and Mr. Pryor) introduced the following 
        bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
        FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                           State of Arkansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860C-1(b) of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 241 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 
and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) No cca areas within arkansas.--A CCA area shall not 
        include an MSA any portion of which is within the State of 
        Arkansas.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
#### GERALD A. DORMAN v. HEALTH SERVICE INCORPORATED.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-45752) of JNI Corporation of our report
dated January 23, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated January 23, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California
March 23, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
          THE CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  THE CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE
          SHEETS,  AND THE  ACCOMPANYING  NOTES  TO THE  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL
          STATEMENTS,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000893162
<NAME>                                            q#ygjp9a
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                      US DOLLARS

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              66,066
<SECURITIES>                                        52,810
<RECEIVABLES>                                       51,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,987
<INVENTORY>                                         35,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   228,904
<PP&E>                                              95,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                      52,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     313,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               50,402
<BONDS>                                             96,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                22
<OTHER-SE>                                         166,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       313,736
<SALES>                                            116,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   116,968
<CGS>                                               59,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       59,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (16,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5,984)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (10,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      1,646
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (8,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.43)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 4.16**

**English Summary of the 1st Amendment to the Line of Credit Agreement between Banco do Brasil and Ipiranga Produtos de Petróleo S.A., datedMarch 8, 2013**

The agreement amends the maturity date and interest rate of the R$500 million Line of Credit Agreement(“Line of Credit Agreement”) between Banco do Brasil S.A. (“Banco do Brasil”) and Ipiranga Produtos de Petróleo S.A. (“IPP”), dated March 26, 2010. The maturity date of the amounts drawn down under Line ofCredit Agreement were extended from March 8, 2013 to February 21, 2016, at which date IPP is required to pay all outstanding principal and accrued interest. All amounts drawn down under the Line of Credit Agreement will bear an annualfixed interest rate of 104.3% of the interbank deposit rate (CDI), as calculated therein. The principal amount will be paid in two installments, the first on February 21, 2015, in the total amount of R$333.3 million, and the second onFebruary 21, 2016, in the total amount of R$166.7 million. Interest payments will be made on each date on which the principal is repaid. All other provisions set forth in the Line of Credit Agreement remain unaltered.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Official Payments
Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-95825) of our
report dated January 26, 2000, relating to the balance sheets of Official
Payments Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Official Payments Corporation.


                                    /s/  KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 30, 2000
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Larkin,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Larkin               |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy A. Larkin                   |   |
| *Executive Vice President,*         |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*           |   |
| *And Principal Accounting  Officer* |   |
|                                |   |
| May 7, 2008                    |   |

 

1

----