alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
What is the UNP Mission Concept Program? 

1

Helping University & Students Get Ready for Space Opportunities – Inaugural 

Summer 2023 Program 

 

 

 

 

 

 ull UNP Cycle

 ASA CSLI

 

 

 

• Alleviate high barrier to entry

o Full satellite development is not easy

o UNP/CSLI cycle(s) have aggressive schedule(s)

o Improve university proposals

• Provide support for and strengthen readiness

of universities, teams and faculty*

o Prepare teams for UNP Nanosatellite Cycle

o Prepare teams for NASA CSLI

• The next UNP Nanosatellite Cycle begins in 2024,

now is the time to prepare!

*Participation in this program does not guarantee future selection for UNP programs or NASA CSLI.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement/Proposals Received/Criteria 

• UNP/NASA Mission Concept-1 Program advertised thru: 

o The Air Force University Nanosatellite Program (UNP) Solicitations Website 

o NASA MUREP Minority Serving Institution (MSI) Exchange 

o The NASA Small Spacecraft Virtual Institute 

o NASA Days at Texas Southern University 

o The NASA Space Grant Consortium 

• Received 21 Universities Proposals reviewed by 28 different experienced Air 

Force/NASA/Contractor evaluators 

• Selected universities based on the following criteria: 

o Educational impact 

o University program impact/development 

o Minority outreach/support 

o NASA/DoD relevance 

2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNP Mission Concept Awardees / Summary 

1. Florida Institute of Technology – Not a minority serving institution 

2. University of the Virgin Islands – HBCU 

3. University of South Florida – Not a minority serving institution 

4. University of New Mexico – Minority Serving Institution – Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) 

5. Missouri University of Science and Technology – Not a minority serving institution 

6. New Mexico State University – Minority Serving Institution – Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) 

7. Columbia University – Not a minority serving institution 

8. Tarleton State University – Minority Serving Institution – Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) 

• Summary

• 1 HBCU, 3 HSIs, 4 Non 

• First time that a HBCU has won a UNP competition 

• 6 of the Universities are new to UNP (all but New Mexico State and Missouri S&T) 

• 4 Universities are new to CSLI (Florida Tech, UVI, USF, and Tarleton) 

• Kick-off Meeting – KSC Visitor Center, May 22-24, 2023 

o Students will spend a month (June) at Air Force’s UNP facilities in Albuquerque, New Mexico 

o Final presentation at Albuquerque, followed by meeting at Small Sat Conference – Logan, Utah 

3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of BGC Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, each of Howard W. Lutnick, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven R. McMurray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) This Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form
10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                                   |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /S/ HOWARD W. LUTNICK                             |  |  |  |        |  | /S/ STEVEN R. MCMURRAY 
|Name:  |  | Howard W. Lutnick                                 |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Steven R. McMurray     
|Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 29, 2016
Enclosure

NASA Advisory Council Recommendation

NASA STEM Strategic Plan

2002-01-05

Name of Committee: 

Chair of Committee: 

Date of Council Public Deliberation: 

Short Title of Recommendation: 

STEM Engagement Committee

Mr. Daniel Dumbacher 

March 1, 2022 

NASA STEM Strategic Plan 

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends continued emphasis on the NASA STEM Strategic Plan (NASA 

Strategy for STEM Engagement, 2020-2023), especially integration and use across the NASA 

Mission Directorates. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

The NASA Office of STEM Engagement has made significant progress in tracking the 

Strategic Plan status and coordinating across the NASA Mission Directorates. Continued 

momentum will continue to enhance the NASA STEM impact. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Lack of coordination across the Agency on STEM activities could lead to duplication of 

efforts and unaddressed priorities. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with the recommendation for continued emphasis on the NASA STEM 

Strategic Plan (NASA Strategy for STEM Engagement, 2020-2023). The Office of STEM 

Engagement (OSTEM) continues to provide leadership across the Agency in aligning its 

STEM Engagement programs and activities to the Strategy for STEM Engagement. The 

STEM Engagement Council (SEC) consists of a group of STEM Engagement stakeholders 

from OSTEM, other functional offices (e.g., Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, 

Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity), and NASA Mission Directorates. Monthly 

meetings ensure coordination across the Agency on STEM Engagement activities and 

priorities. Additionally, the SEC oversees an annual comprehensive portfolio planning 

process, and this process analyzes alignment to the NASA Strategy for STEM Engagement. 

OSTEM is also coordinating performance and evaluation activities across STEM Engagement 

activities and will provide a report to the NASA Advisory Council’s STEM Engagement 

Committee regarding its findings.
#### Blair and Another *v.*Williams.

*Friday, May*31.

Suit on a written promise by the defendant to assign to the plaintiff a note on a third person. *Held,*that parol evidence tending to show that the assignment was to be without recourse, was inadmissible.

ERROR to the *Decatur*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This was an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiffs in error. The declaration contains several counts, to which several pleas were filed. The pleadings may be considered, however, so far as the question we are to decide is concerned, as consisting of a declaration on a *133written promise, and of the plea of non assumpsit. The following is the written promise relied on: “For value ed, I promise to assign a note of hand I hold on *Harrison T.*Jones, made payable to me, and worth on the face of it, on the 25th of this month, 220 dollars lawful money of the state of Indiana, unto *J.*and *P. R. Blair of-Greensburgh,*Indiana, sometime in the month of January, 1841. *December*26th, *1840.*— Samuel Williams.”

*G. H.*Dunn, for the plaintiffs.

*W. W. Wick*and *L.*Barbour, for the defendant.

Verdict for the plaintiffs for one cent, and judgment on the verdict.

On the trial, the defendant offered parol evidence tending to prove that the note which he had agreed to assign was to be assigned without recourse on him; which evidence though objected to was admitted.

We think the Court erred in admitting this evidence. The defendant’s contract must be understood to be, that he would assign the note in the ordinary form; and the legal effect of such an assignment is, that if the money cannot be collected, by due diligence, from the maker of the note, the assignee may look to the assignor for payment. The evidence in question tended to show that the assignment was not to be in the ordinary form, and was not to have the legal effect of an ordinary assignment. It therefore tended to vary the written contract of the defendant, and was inadmissible. *Odam*v. Beard, 1 Blackf. *191.*—Wilson v. Black, 6 Blackf. 509.

*Per Curiam.*•

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 22, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS MONTGOMERY JACOBS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

NORTON CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY; KANSAS DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-3096

(D.C. No. 5:07-CV-03286-SAC)

(D. of Kansas)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R

3.3(B) and 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3096 Document: 01018462182 Date Filed: 07/22/2010 Page: 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

JOHN PAUL THOMAS,

Petitioner.

No. 10-2029

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-00625-RB-RHS)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER

Before KELLY, EBEL, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

John Paul Thomas has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this

court to direct the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico to

rule on his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. Mr. Thomas’s case has

been at issue for less than six months, since October 15, 2009. We conclude that

the district court has not unduly delayed in acting on the petition and therefore

Mr. Thomas has failed to demonstrate his entitlement to the extraordinary relief

of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED. Mr. Thomas’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis is also DENIED.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2029 Document: 01018398513 Date Filed: 04/07/2010 Page: 1
ROBERT ALLAN RIDLEY PARKER (PH.D.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born in New York City on December 14, 1936, but grew up in 

Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. Married to the former Judy Woodruff of San Marino, 

California. Five Children and nine grandchildren.

EDUCATION: Attended primary and secondary schools in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts; 

received a bachelor of arts degree in Astronomy and Physics from Amherst College in 

1958, and a doctorate in Astronomy from the California Institute of Technology in 1962.

ORGANIZATIONS: Member of the American Astronomical Society, and the 

International Astronomical Union. 

SPECIAL HONORS: Awarded the NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal 

(1973), and the NASA Outstanding Leadership Medal (1974).

EXPERIENCE: Prior to his selection for astronaut training, Dr. Parker was an associate professor of astronomy at the 

University of Wisconsin.

He has logged over 3,500 hours flying time in jet aircraft, and 463 hours in space.

NASA EXPERIENCE: Dr. Parker was selected as a scientist-astronaut by NASA in August 1967. He was a member of the 

astronaut support crews for the Apollo 15 and 17 missions and served as Program Scientist for the Skylab Program Director's 

Office during the three manned Skylab flights. From March 1988 to March 1989 Dr. Parker was stationed at NASA 

Headquarters in Washington D.C. where he served as Director of the Space Flight/Space Station Integration Office. A veteran of 

two Spacelab missions, Dr. Parker was a mission specialist on STS-9/Spacelab-1 (Nov 28 to Dec 8, 1983) and on STS-35 (Dec 

2-10, 1990) which featured the ASTRO-1 ultraviolet astronomy laboratory. Dr. Parker was the Director of the Division of Policy 

and Plans for the Office of Space Flight at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. from January 1991 to December 1991. 

From January 1992 to November 1993 he was Director of the Spacelab and Operations Program. From December 1993 to 

August 1997 he was Manager of the Space Operations Utilization Program. In August 1997 to August 2005 he served as 

Director of the NASA Management Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.

Dr. Parker retired from NASA on August 31, 2005. 

DECEMBER 2005

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David C. Owen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David C. Owen      
|David C. Owen          
|Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2008
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


Of
Title 18 of the United States Code





In
connection with the periodic report of Vertro, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Cutler, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:





1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





/s/Michael CutlerChief
      Financial Officer, Vertro, Inc.Date:
      March 25, 2010
<PAGE>   1



                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.5(f)




                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


              THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made
January 4, 2000 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the "Corporation")
and Richard P. Herpich (the "Executive").

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that
certain Employment Agreement effective as of January 17, 1994, as amended June
30, 1994, December 19, 1995, February 18, 1997, December 30, 1997 and December
15, 1998 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the
Employment Agreement to extend the term of employment under the Employment
Agreement.

              NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the parties
hereto agree as set forth below.

              1. Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                    "The Employment Period shall commence as of January 17, 1994
              (the "Effective Date") and shall continue until the close of
              business on December 31, 2002."

              2. Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                    "(a)  Position.  During the Employment Period, the Executive
              shall serve as Executive Vice President of Manufacturer Services."

              3. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement
shall be amended to read as follows:

                    "The Executive's Annual Base Salary ("Annual Base Salary"),
              payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate of not
              less than $250,000 effective January 1, 2000."

<PAGE>   2




              4. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

              5. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement,
contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused
this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                                   VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                                   By:
                                                      --------------------------
                                                   Name:
                                                        ------------------------
                                                   Title:
                                                         -----------------------

                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         Richard P. Herpich




                                       2
EX-4.32





 Exhibit 4.32 

Spouse Consent Letter 
 To: Genetron
(Wuxi) Business Management Co., Ltd. 
 Whereas: 
  

	1.	 I, [***] (ID card/passport number: [***]), am the spouse of the natural person Wang Sizhen (ID card number:
[***]). Wang Sizhen holds 90% equity of Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Target Equity Interest”) 


  

	2.	 With respect to the aforementioned Target Equity Interest held by Wang Sizhen, Wang Sizhen entered into the
Exclusive Option Agreement with other related parties on December 7, 2020, entered into the Equity Pledge Agreement with other related parties on December 7, 2020, and entered into the Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement with
other related parties on December 7, 2020; and 


  

	3.	 Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd. entered into the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement with Genetron
(Wuxi) Business Management Co., Ltd. on December 7, 2020. This Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement together with the aforementioned Exclusive Option Agreement, Equity Pledge Agreement and Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement
constitute the contractual control arrangement regarding Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractual Control Arrangement”). 



I hereby confirm and irrevocably undertake as follows on December 7, 2020: 
  

	1.	 I confirm that I have noted and agree that my spouse Wang Sizhen entered into the Exclusive Call Agreement,
Equity Pledge Agreement and Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement. The aforementioned Target Equity Interest of Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd. held by Wang Sizhen is not our joint property. I have no rights and interests in such Target
Equity Interest, (including the rights gained from the Contractual Control Arrangement). I will never take any action to interfere with the Contractual Control Arrangement, including but not limited to claiming any right over the aforementioned
Target Equity Interest and the Contractual Control Arrangement. 


  

	2.	 I hereby undertake, I have not participated in and will not plan to actually participate in the operation and
management of Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd. in the future, and I will not claim any right related to the equity interests and assets of Genetron (Wuxi) Biotech Co., Ltd.. 



  
 1 














	3.	 If, for any reason, I obtain all or part of the Target Equity Interest, I unconditionally agree to be a party
of the Contractual Control Arrangement and be bound by the Contractual Control Arrangement. In this respect, I undertake to take all necessary actions and to sign all necessary documents. 



This letter will take effect immediately upon its signature by me and will be continuously effective. 

  
 2 













 (This page is intentionally left blank and is the signing page of this Spouse Consent Letter) 

 

			
	Undertaker’s Signature:	 	 /s/ [Name of Spouse]





			
	
	Date: December 7, 2020



  
 3
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Remove Restrictions on NASA Center 

Education and Public Outreach Spending 

2013-01-09 (EPOC-03) 

Recommendation: 

If a mission team, along with the NASA Office ofEducation, determine that an educational 

initiative is in the best interests ofthe mission, and can identify funding from non-educational 

budget funds, they should have the authority to spend those funds for that purpose. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

Citizen science, participatory exploration, "crowdsourcing," and public engagement are often 

critical components of a mission, potentially including making contributions to the mission's 

science return. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Prohibition on the use of available non-education budget funds for public outreach activities 

unnecessarily further cripples the ability ofNASA to engage the public in the way that it 

uniquely can. 

NASA Response: 

NASA's Office ofEducation appreciates the support and insight ofthe NASA Advisory Council; 

however, non-concurs with the recommendation. Consistent with the Administration's plan, 

NASA's Office ofEducation will lead the Agency's coordination with other Federal agencies in 

pursuit ofthe Administration's Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) 

education goals. NASA will consolidate the education functions, assets, and efforts ofthe 

Mission Directorates, Offices, and Centers into a single coordinated STEM Education and 

Accountability Project. NASA will strive to maintain the best ofthese activities, 'which provide 

unique NASA experiences and resources to students and faculty. 

Through the Education Coordinating Council, NASA will coordinate activities, and ensure that 

NASA focuses on its two key strengths: I) engaging undergraduate and graduate students in 

internships and fellowships; and 2) providing opportunities for participatory and experiential 

learning activities that connect learners, educators, and communities to NASA-unique resources. 

In addition to the activities directly funded by NASA, the Agency will ensure that its people, 

facilities, and assets are available for use in the STEM consolidation effort. 

Enclosure