alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAVEYOUTIME.COM. INC.

            INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE OF NEVADA
        20,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, $.001 PAR VALUE
THIS
CERTIFIES
THAT                                                   SEE REVERSE FOR
                                                       CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

IS THE OWNER OF


          FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
                            SAVEYOUTIME.COM. INC.

     transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly
 authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.
This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws
of this State of Nevada, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
  of the Corporation, as now hereafter amended.  This certificate is not
 valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.  WITNESS the facsimile
seal of the Corporation and the signature of its duly authorized officers.

DATE

                            SAVEYOUTIME.COM. INC.
                              Corporate Seal
                                  Nevada
                                                              SECRETARY
CONFERENCE ATTENDEE TOOLKIT

NASA & PARTNERS SMALL BUSINESS & HBCU SUMMIT

Create, Connect and Collaborate...

Share your insights, observations, and excitement about 

attending NASA and Partners Small Business and HBCU Summit

in Washington DC 2024! Don't know where to start? Check out 

the suggested message ideas to get started!

What to Expect?

Attendees can expect to directly engage with other “likeminded” industry counterparts, NASA representatives, and 

various small business experts. Attendees will also gain insight 

and participate in interactive sessions led by NASA 

procurement specialists, where you'll receive valuable 

information.

Parking:

Howard University. Metered parking is available on 6th Street 

on campus and in the surrounding area through Parkmobile. 

Vehicles parked WITHOUT a valid permit in PERMIT LOTS are 

subject to ticketing, towing, and or immobilization (at owner’s 

expense). Pay-As-You-Go parking lot is located at 2235 8th St.

Post-Survey

We value your opinion and would love to hear your feedback 

on today’s event. Take a few minutes to fill out our survey 

before April 12, 2024.

Key Event Info Here!

Schedule of Events

────

The Small Business 

Guide to NASA

───

NASA SBIR/STTR 

Program

───

Dining Options – What’s 

Open Now!!

───

Bison Safe App

───

Metro Schedule and 

Map

───

Event Hashtag 

#NASASBHBCUSUMMIT

NASA OSBP Links: 

NASA Listening Sessions

OSBP Learning Series

Outreach Calendar

OSBP Homepage

Small Business Resource Links

Howard University Campus Map

Looking for the latest updates? Connect with OSBP 

• NEW!!! NASA Vendor Database

• Facebook

• Twitter @NASA_OSBP

• OSBP Mobile App
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Warren Resources Inc. ("Warren"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Warren on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Warren.

|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/NORMAN F. SWANTONNorman F. Swanton Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer                                           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/TIMOTHY A. LARKINTimothy A. Larkin Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2119

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                         State of Connecticut.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2004

Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                         State of Connecticut.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860C-1(b) of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 241 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 
and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) No cca areas within connecticut.--A CCA area shall 
        not include an MSA any portion of which is within the State of 
        Connecticut.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesse Green, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 868]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.), rendered February 1, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the effectiveness of his trial representation involves matters outside the record and thus would require a CPL 440.10 motion *(People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love, 57*NY2d 998 [1982]). To the extent that the present record permits review, it establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). There is nothing in the record to suggest that counsel should have called an alibi witness, or any other witnesses.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The photographic and lineup identifications were not unduly suggestive *(see People v Chipp, 15*NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). Defendant’s attacks on the reliability of the identifying witness are unpreserved and unavailing, and in any event, would not establish a legal basis for suppression. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
OSBP in the Community

Campaign and Tool Kit

Tracy Hudspeth

Communications Specialist

OSBP Contractor
About the Campaign

January 15th, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is a federal holiday designated as 

the National Day of Service. For the month of January, we will be 

celebrating OSBP in the Community! Our SBSs are the heartbeat of our 

organization, and our advocacy extends beyond our commitment to small 

businesses. OSBP will be showcasing our OSBP team serving their 

communities! 

SBSs who are interested in participating in this campaign will send a 

picture(s) of themselves in action while volunteering and submit their 

answers to the following questions:

• What organization do you volunteer with?

• Why did you choose to volunteer this organization?

• What does volunteering mean to you?

2
NASA OSBP Small Business Saturday 

Campaign at-a-Glance

NASA OSBP in the Community Tool kit:

• Digital poster

• Social Media Graphic

• Virtual Background

• Volunteer Opportunity Graphic

• Tips for Finding the Perfect Volunteer Opportunity

3
NASA OSBP in the Community 

Campaign at-a-Glance

4

NASA OSBP in the Community Social Media Campaign Schedule:

Week 1 (January 8- January 12, 2024):

• Launch of Campaign

• OSBP in the Community Graphic

• Highlight post of volunteer experience

• Truphelia Parker

• Naeemah Lee

Week 2 (January 15- January 19, 2024):

• Volunteer Opportunity Graphic 

• Highlight post of volunteer experience

• Robert Betts

Week 3 (January 22- January 26, 

2024):

• Tips for Finding the Perfect 

Volunteer Opportunity

• 1 Highlight post of volunteer 

experience

• Eunice Adams-Sipp

Week 4 (January 29- January 31, 

2024):

• Highlight post of volunteer 

experience 

• Djaataa Onanuga
NASA OSBP in the

Community Tool Kit 

Poster

5

Post on your social media pages
NASA OSBP in the Community Tool Kit

Social Media Graphic

6

Post on your 

social media 

pages
NASA OSBP in the Community Tool Kit 

Virtual Background

7

For use in your 

meetings during 

the month of 

January
NASA OSBP in the Community 

Social Media Graphic: Volunteer Ideas

8

Post on your 

social media 

pages
NASA OSBP in the Community Tool Kit

Social Media Graphic: Volunteer Tips

9

Post on your 

social media 

pages
Get Social!

When posting to social media please use the following hashtags. 

Hashtags help increase our engagement and visibility!

#OSBPintheCommunity

10
Order entered May 1 2 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00061

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

V.

JACKSON CONATSER , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 1

- 0354

O RDER

Before the Court is appellee ’ s May 7, 2021 second motion for an extension

of time to file his b rief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief filed by

May 17, 2021.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

Office of the Administrator 

............................................ 

i Robert W. Cohb I 

inspector General (w) i .............. ........................................... : 

Sean 0 Keefe, Adminisfrator 

Daniel R. Mulville. Associate Deoutv Administrator 

.............. Vacant, Deputy Adminkfrator Advisory Panel 

Lee B. Holcomb, ChiefIn&mafion Oficer 

Shannon W. Lucid, ChiefScienfisf 

Samuel L. Venncri, Chief Technologisf 

- 

., Michael D.Christensen. Assoc. Deputy Admin.,lnslifufions 

Cowlney Stadd, Chief of Staffand White House Liaison 

NASA Advisory Spence M. Armstrong, Senior Advbor ............. 

I I I 

Equal Opportunity Human Resources k 

Chief Financial OMcer (B) Programs (E) Education (0 

Stephen Vicki A. Novak J. Varholy (Act.) George E. Recse 

CFO Arsir fun1 ddminislTo1l)T A.wirtrmr .Ihninivfrotor 

I 1 I I Council Keith Hudkins, ChierEngineer (AcI) I Richard S. Williams, ChiefHealfh & Medical 0F)icer 

1 I 

Procurement (H) 

Paul Pastonk Thomas S. Luedtkc 

General Counsel Asristunl Adminisfrutnr 

,-ounlcl 

r I I 

Management ' Small and Dlsadvant d 

Buslnn, Utilization (K) 

Ralph c. ,11 

Assi.sfont Administrutor Assistunt Admmbfrufor 

External Relations (I) John D. Schumachcr Systems (J) 

A.ssi.sfunt Admini.strutor E. sutton 

I I 1 

LcgiJative Afiairs (L) Public Affairs (P) secu'ty 

Assislonr Adminislrumr Amimnt Admmirlrutor David 

and Safeguards (X) 

Assi.stunr Adminbrrufor 

Charles T. Homer 111 Glenn Mahonc 

Omce (C) 

Timothy M. Sullivan 

I 

Space Right (M) Frederick D. Gregory 

Assrx. Admrnistrufor 

* Lyndon B. Johnson 

Spuce Center 

JeNcrson D. Howell. Jr. 

- John F. Kennerly Spuce 

Center 

Roy D. Bridges 

* George C Marshull 

Spuce Night Center 

Arthur G. Stephenson 

* John C. Stennis Spuce 

Cenfer 

Roy S. Eness 

Goddurd Spuce 

Flight Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

Ames Reseutrh i * Jet Propulsion 

Cenfer \ Luborufory 

Henry McDonald Charles Elachi 

Research Center 

Kevin Peterscn 

* Langley Re.seurch 

Center 

Delma C. Freeman. Jr. (Act) 

- John H. Glenn 

Research Center of 

Lewis Field 

Donald 1. Campbell 

- Dyden Flight ' 

JPL is a confrucfor-o~rutedfocili~. 

Assurance (Q) 

Bryan D. 0 Connor 

Assoc. Adminisfrutor 

June 17. 2002
Nominee Winner

Glenn Butts Glenn Butts

Rachel Sholder

Steve Wilson Steve Wilson

Gateway KDP Cost and Schedule Team

Rick Battle, Chris Blake, Cassie Chang, 

Marissa Conway, Jon Drexler, Will Hopkins, 

Ethan Miller, Krista Stroh, Ashley Varma, 

Natalie Weckesser

Gateway KDP Cost and Schedule Team

Rick Battle, Chris Blake, Cassie Chang, 

Marissa Conway, Jon Drexler, Will Hopkins, 

Ethan Miller, Krista Stroh, Ashley Varma, 

Natalie Weckesser

Mars Sample Return CADRe Team

Kyle Brown, Gary Ho, Vahe Mazmanian, 

Jeffrey Smith, John Spagnuolo Jr

Nick Frazier

Madison McCall 

Rachel Sholder Rachel Sholder

Brian Alford Brian Alford 

Barbara Phillips Barbara Phillips

Cabin Samuels Cabin Samuels

Doug Comstock Doug Comstock 

Dennis Davidson Dennis Davidson

Andy Prince Andy Prince

William S. Rutledge Life Time Achievement Award - 2023

The NASA Cost and Schedule Leadership Award - 2023

he NASA Cost and Schedule Analyst of the Year Award - 2023

The NASA Cost and Schedule Team Award - 2023

The NASA Cost and Schedule Rising Star Award -2023

The NASA Cost and Schedule Support Contractor of the Year Award - 2023

The NASA Top Community Support Award - 2023
#### In the Matter of Rhagi El, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.

[786 NYS2d 851]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

*764Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination of guilt was upheld on administrative appeal, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the positive urinalysis test results, supporting documentation and testimony of the correction officers who administered the tests, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of McCorkle v Bennett,*8 AD3d 918, 919 [2004]; *Matter of Sanchez v Selsky,*8 AD3d 846, 846 [2004). Petitioner’s claim that the chain of custody was broken is without merit. The officers who tested the urine specimen testified that the sample remained in their possession when it was not secured in the freezer and the request for urinalysis form set forth the specific times the sample was handled and by whom, thereby establishing that the appropriate testing procedures were followed *(see Matter of Velez v Selsky,*6 AD3d 783 [2004]; *Matter of Victor v Goord,*309 AD2d 1026, 1026 [2003]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or meritless *(see Matter of Presley v Miller,*306 AD2d 707, 707 [2003]; *Matter of Valentine v Coughlin,*200 AD2d 838, 838 [1994]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AIMS Worldwide, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick Summers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Patrick Summers

Patrick Summers

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 15, 2005
#### Fellows and Others *v.*Shelmire, Administratrix.

*Saturday, November 24.*

Although a bill in chancery be taken for confessed, yet if there be any uncertainty in its statement of the facts necessary to its support, the complainant cannot have a final decree without proof.

ERROR to the *Martin*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Mrs. *Shelmire,*as administratrix of her husband, filed a bill in chancery against the surviving partners of the intestate, and against the administrators of his deceased partners. On the default of some of the defendants, the bill was taken for confessed against them all; and a final decree, without any proof, was rendered against them for 2,552 dollars.

Several errors are assigned, but we shall notice but one of them.

There is not sufficient certainty in the principal charge of the bill to authorise the decree.

*49*S. Judah and J. A. Brackenridge,*for the plaintiffs.

*A. Kinney and J. Law,*for the defendant.

The bill alleges that after the intestate’s death, the surviving partners divided the stock of the company, consisting of debts due them, lots, lands, notes, &c., and allotted a share of a stated value to the intestate’s estate. The principal object of the suit is to recover the amount of the share so allotted to the intestate’s estate, and the decree is, *inter alia,*for the amount of the share so valued. The bill does not show, however, what became of the intestate’s part of the stock ; nor by what authority the proceeds of the real estate of her intestate are claimed by the administratrix. The uncertainty of the bill as to these matters, is sufficient to reverse the decree. *Pegg*v. *Davis,*2 Blackf. 281.

There are other objections made to the bill, but we have not examined them.

*Per*Curiam.

The decree is reversed, &c. Cause remanded, with leave to the complainant to amend her bill.
****
 **Exhibit
10**
  **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File Number 333-12156) pertaining to the Radware Ltd. 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-13818)
pertaining to the Radware Ltd. 1997 Key Employee Share Incentive Plan and 2001
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-12156) pertaining to Radware
Ltd. Amended and Restated 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-13818) pertaining to Radware Ltd. Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number
333-105213) pertaining to the Radware Ltd. 2002 Employee Share Purchase Plan, of
our report dated January 30, 2005, with respect to the Consolidated Financial
Statements of Radware Ltd., included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the
year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
  Tel - Aviv, Israel
    KOST FORER GABBAY &
      KASIERERApril 13, 2005
    A Member of Ernst & Young
      Global
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance Companies, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred W. Wagenhals, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Fred W. Wagenhals
Strategy Based on Long-Term 

$ in millions

0

5,000

10,00015,00020,00025,000

FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 

FY05 (infla

Retire

Shuttle

Co

Res

Crew 

Exploration 

Vehicle

Aeronautics and Other Science 

Space Shuttle

ISS Transport

Exploration Missions 

Human/Robotic Technology

Crew Exploration Vehicle

International Space Station

Pres. FY05 Five-Year 

Budget Plan

NOTE: Exploration missions – Robotic and eventual human missions to Moon, Mars, and beyond

Human/Robotic Technology – Technologies to enable development of exploration space systemCrew Exploration Vehicle – Transportation vehicle for human explorersISS Transport – US and foreign launch systems to support Space Station needs especially afte