alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kiritkumar BHATT, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-60723.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2003.

Imran B. Mirza, Quan, Burdette & Perez, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

John Ashcroft, Ethan B. Kanter, Linda S. Wernery, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Hipólito Acosta, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, Houston, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration *424& Naturalization Service, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Kiritkumar Bhatt petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying Bhatt’s request for asylum or withholding of deportation. Bhatt contends that the deportability determination was not supported by substantial evidence. We do not disturb the IJ’s determination that Bhatt was not credible. *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,055
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,280
<PP&E>                                          39,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,090
<SALES>                                         45,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   958
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    186
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       186
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JESSE ROWLAND, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-94-251, CA-00-1116-1)

Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Rowland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jesse Rowland, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a proceeding under

§ 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a

district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the

petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F. 3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.

2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We

have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the

district court that Rowland has not made the requisite showing.

See United States v. Rowland, Nos. CR-94-251; CA-00-1116-1

(M.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The University of Georgia (UGA), et al.; Notice of Decision on 
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 06-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 10-054. Applicant: The University of Georgia (UGA), 
Athens, GA 30602-7229. Instrument: HV Pneumatic Quadrant Beam Position 
Monitor with I404 Quad Current Integrator. Manufacturer: FMB Oxford 
Limited, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 57738, 
September 22, 2010. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. 
Reasons: The instrument must meet the following specifications: an 11 
mm diameter beam aperture, a He leak rate of < 2 x 10[caret] - 8 mbar 
I/sec, HV compatible to < 5 x 10 - 7 mbar vacuum, an operational range 
of 2 bar to 7 bar, a 6 mm pneumatic air connection, and a 24 VCD (1.2W) 
at 50 mA solenoid with flying leads. We know of no instruments of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, 
for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
    Docket Number: 10-059. Applicant: University of Chicago, LLC, 
Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Micropitting Test Machine. Manufacturer: 
Primelia Consulting Services Limited, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See 
notice at 75 FR 57738, September 22, 2010. Comments: None received. 
Decision: Approved. Reasons: The instrument has capabilities that are 
tailored for the specific micropitting analysis, specifically the 
accelerometer measurement to monitor for onset of fatigue failure. The 
instrument also has three points of contact which will increase the 
speed at which tests are made. We know of no instruments of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such 
purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of its order.

    Dated: October 29, 2010.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-27888 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By

/s/     RANDALL L. FEWELRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer




Date:
  May 12, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Antex Biologics Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, V. M.
Esposito, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ V. M. Esposito                                     
|                                                       
|V. M. Esposito
Chief Executive Officer
November 7, 2002
Exhibit 99.3

                         OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1999-D

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (May 1999 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated August 1, 1999among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and Chase Manhattan Trust Co., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 1998 through September
30, 1999 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.


By:  /s/ Douglas R. Muir
------------------------

Name:  Douglas R. Muir
------------------------

Title:     Vice President
-------------------------

Date:   September 30, 1999
--------------------------
NASA	
  Advisory Council

Taskforce on STEM	
  EducaKon MeeKng

April 3, 2015

James L. Stofan

Chair, Task	
  Force on STEM	
  EducaKon
	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

MeeKng Topics

• IntroducOon of Task Force

• Task Force Terms of Reference and Charge
 

• Federal STEM	
  Strategic Plan

• CommiQee on STEM	
  (CoSTEM) EducaOon
 

•	 Federal Partners

2 
	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

MeeKng Topics

• NASA Strategic Plan and EducaOon

• NASA Mission and Vision

• NASA Goals & EducaOon ObjecOve

• NASA EducaOon Mission and Vision

• NASA EducaOon

• Office of EducaOon

• Mission Directorates

• Centers Offices of EducaOon

• Ethics Briefing

• NASA EducaOon ImplementaOon Plan Progress

• Discussion and RecommendaOons

3 
Introduction of Task Force

• Dr. Margaret	
  Honey

• Ms. Aimee Kennedy

• Dr. Anita	
  Krishnamurthi

• Dr. Michael Lach

• Mr. Ray Mellado

• Dr. Carl Person

• Mr. James Stofan

4 
Terms of Reference
 

• Ad hoc task force of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) 

• Scope includes all NASA Education programs, projects, missions and activities. 

• Meet approximately three times per year, in advance of NAC meetings. 

• Report on Progress to the NAC 

• Support of Task Force Executive Secretary 

5 
Charge
 

•	 IteraOve process over the two-­‐year term of the commiQee.

•	 IniOal Topics for Task Force ConsideraOon:

•	 Advice on NASA ImplementaOon Plan

•	 Structure of EducaOon efforts and ability to conduct	
  rigorous

program management	
  reviews

•	 Sustainability of educaOon program over the next	
  several years

•	 CompeOOve allocaOon of funds to elicit	
  the best	
  projects

•	 PosiOon of NASA EducaOon as a leader in CoSTEM

•	 ArOculaOon of success using data	
  and story

6 
Thank	
  you!

7
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 99.2


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                         -------------------------------



To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of FC Banc Corp.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FC Banc Corp.
(the "Company") and subsidiary as of March 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated January 18, 2002, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
May 10, 2002
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2243 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 2243 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT. 

3 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

4 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

5 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission project numbered 11480, the Commission may, at 

7 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea8 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili9 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and 

10 the Commission’s procedures under that section extend 

11 the time period during which the licensee is required to 

12 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 

13 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years after the 

14 date of issuance of the license. 

Passed the Senate September 15, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Z M O O N S Z U

R A P X E P S O

R O R Y N A O R

S R C T O C A E

M O J K E E R W

A A C V E M U A

Y R R Q E T I E

M T R S T A R S

Hooray for SLS!

SPACE

MOON 

STARS

ROCKET

ROAR

ARTEMIS

MARS

SOAR
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David J. Mickelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: August 10, 2006

                                         BY:   /s/  David J. Mickelson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               David J. Mickelson
                                               President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65695-65696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 12353 and <greek-i> 12354]


North Carolina Disaster Number NC-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-1942-DR), dated 
10/14/2010.

[[Page 65696]]

    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Straight-line Winds 
associated with remnants of Tropical Storm Nicole.
    Incident Period: 09/27/2010 through 10/01/2010.

DATES:  Effective Date: 10/19/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/13/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated 10/14/2010 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): 
Brunswick, Jones, Pender, Pitt.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    North Carolina: Bladen, Columbus, Edgecombe, Greene, New Hanover, 
Sampson, Wilson.
    South Carolina: Horry.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)


Cynthia G. Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27090 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Graphic Packaging International
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Jeffrey H. Coors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and Luis E. Leon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2003                            By /s/ Jeffrey H. Coors
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey H. Coors
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  President


Date:  May 15, 2003                            By /s/ Luis E. Leon
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Luis E. Leon
                                                  Chief Financial Officer