alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OncoVista Innovative
      Therapies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alexander
      L. Weis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
      presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.





Dated:
      April 14, 2008


By:
              /s/
                  Alexander L. WeisAlexander
                  L. WeisChief
                  Executive Officer


This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and will be retained OncoVista
      Innovative Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vista Exploration
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
A. Ross, President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Charles A. Ross
--------------------
Charles A. Ross
President
July 15, 2003

"A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vista Exploration and will be retained by Vista Exploration and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. GEREMY FORD, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 356 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,051                  62,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      870                   4,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (193)                   (548)
<INVENTORY>                                        331                     558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,456                  69,405
<PP&E>                                             313                     629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (206)                   (194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,751                  71,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,263                  10,489
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,732                  65,109
<OTHER-SE>                                       (236)                 (3,509)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,751                  71,239
<SALES>                                          7,515                  21,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,515                  21,047
<CGS>                                            3,308                   5,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,716                  13,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   122                     355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54                     536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,455)                   1,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6                   1,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,461)                     158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,461)                     158
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)                    0.01


</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

John H. Glenn Research Center

Lewis Field

Cleveland, OH 44135-3191

Reply to Attn of:

May 22, 2023

G

TO: Distribution

FROM: G/Chief Counsel, Deputy Designated Agency Ethics Official

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 

2023 Ohio Space Forum

The Dayton Development Coalition (DDC), a non-profit economic development organization, 

will host the 2023 Ohio Space Forum at the Hilton Hotel in downtown Cleveland, Ohio. It is a 

three-day event beginning on May 22, 2023, with a community reception to be held at the NASA 

Visitor’s Center in the Great Lakes Science Museum from 7:00-9:00 p.m. The agenda for May 

23 runs from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., with several NASA GRC and Headquarters speakers, along 

with other industry leaders. That event is followed by a networking reception until 6:00 p.m., 

also at the Hilton Hotel. The third day run is limited to tours of NASA GRC from 9:00 a.m.-

1:00 p.m. This event will focus on increasing awareness of GRC’s unique contributions to space 

technology, with high priority and relevance to the nation and the state.

The DDC has an open invitation through its website to congressional, general and 

military/federal attendees, as well as students and local universities. Federal employees are 

charged $150.00, which includes all events over the three-day period. Attendees will hear a 

diversity of views or interests from business leaders, congressional leaders, academia, NASA 

personnel, and employees of federal agencies. Topics include Ohio’s Space Strategy, Ohio’s 

Key Role in National Security Space, and a panel discussion on Critical Space Technologies. 

I have determined that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event 

because it will provide an opportunity for the attendees to exchange ideas and views pertaining 

to NASA programs and operations. I find that the event meets the requirements of a “widely 

attended gathering” as defined by 5 C.F.R. 2635.204(g)(2).

The NASA employees, including those employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a 

matter affecting the interests of the sponsor, may accept the invitation for free attendance to the 

event for themselves and a guest. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in 

attendance outweighs any concerns that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly 

influenced in the performance of his or her duties.
2

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of DDC, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or 

administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from my office as to 

whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 

precautions appropriate to their individual situation.

Callista M. Puchmeyer

Distribution:

A/J. A. Kenyon

A/D. M. Schaible

A/L. A. Sivic

A/R. L. Sledge

L/R. J. Shyne

M/M. J. Barrett

MSI/D. C. Malarik
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Ignite Solicitation 

 

PHASE II SUBCONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS

Subcontractors/Consultants (if applicable) 

 

• Provide the name of the subcontractor/consultant, and a budget contact that the NASA Procurement Office can 

 contact for budget information. 

• Indicate if you are able to provide detailed budget information for the subcontractor/consultant, and if so provide 

 that information on this page. 

• if you are unable to provide detailed budget information, enter the total cost. 

• Complete this form for each subcontractor/consultant proposed for your R/R&D effort. If you need to include 

 additional subcontractors/consultants, please start another version of this form and append the document title 

 with the form number.

Subcontractor/Consultant

Prefix Budget Contact First Name

Budget Contact Last Name Suffix

Budget Contact Title

Budget Contact Phone Budget Contact Email

Do you have a letter of commitment from the subcontractor/consultant?

Yes No

If yes, include the letter of commitment from the subcontractor/consultant as a PDF or Word document 

along with your submission files.

If no, provide an explanation of any contact you have had with the subcontractor/consultant as to 

their availability to perform the proposed work.

Should the G&A rate for this proposal's budget include the cost for this subcontractor/consultant?

Yes No
Are you able to provide detailed budget information for this subcontractor/consultant?

Yes No

If yes, include the following detailed subcontractor/consultant budget information as a PDF, Word 

document, or Excel file with your submission files. 

• For each individual with the subcontractor/consultant, include: 

 • Labor Category 

 • Role 

 • Hours 

 • Rate 

 • Total Cost 

• For additional costs, include: 

 • Overhead Amount, if applicable 

 • Overhead Explanation, if applicable 

 • G&AAmount, if applicable 

 • G&A Explanation, if applicable 

 • Profit Rate/Cost Sharing Amount, if applicable 

 • Profit Rate/Cost Sharing Explanation, if applicable

If no, provide the total cost:

If no, do you provide the authority to the Government to contact this budget contact?

Yes No

Are you requesting to use a foreign vendor as the subcontractor/consultant?

Yes No

If yes, include the "Request to Use a Foreign Vendor/Purchase of Items from a Foreign Vendor" form 

as a PDF or Word document along with your submission files. The form can be found in Chapter 8 of 

the Ignite solicitation at https://sbir.nasa.gov/solicit/80089/detail?data=ch8.
**EXHIBIT
      10.2**





**DIRECTOR
      FEE ARRANGEMENTS FOR 2008**











**Exhibit
      10.2**





Director
      Fee Arrangements for 2008




Each
      director of *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of Mutual Federal Savings
      Bank (the “Bank”). For 2008, each non-employee director receives an annual fee
      of $27,750 for serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors. In addition to this
      annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis receives a $6,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman
      of the Board of Directors of the Bank, Linn Crull receives a $5,000 annual
      fee
      for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee and Jerry McVicker receives
      a
      $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
      Directors are not compensated for their service on the Company’s Board of
      Directors. ****




The
      Bank
      maintains deferred compensation arrangements with some directors which allows
      them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees and receive income when
      they
      are no longer active directors. Deferred amounts earn interest at the rate
      of 10
      percent per year.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Guadalupe Alejandro,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03562-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Curtis Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/11/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8270 Filed 10/19/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8270 Filed 10/19/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joyce A. Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00218-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/8/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 836 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy Buchamer, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Voice Mobility International, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Voice Mobility International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 26, 2004

/s/ Randy Buchamer
Randy Buchamer, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

PETER ANTHONY GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner.

No. 10-5078

(D.C. No. 4:95-CR-00152-TCK-1)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER

Before KELLY, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

By an order dated July 1, 2010, the district court denied Peter Anthony

Gutierrez’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal

sentence. Before the district court ruled, Mr. Gutierrez filed a petition for a writ

of mandamus requesting that this court order the district court to correct the

alleged clerical error. 

Mandamus is a “drastic and extraordinary remedy reserved for really

extraordinary causes.” Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004)

(quotations omitted). “To ensure that mandamus remains an extraordinary

remedy, petitioners must show that they lack adequate alternative means to obtain

the relief they seek.” Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989). This is

because mandamus cannot be “used as a substitute for the regular appeals

process.” Cheney, 542 U.S. at 381. 

Appellate Case: 10-5078 Document: 01018453944 Date Filed: 07/08/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Mr. Gutierrez has not shown any reason why he cannot appeal the district

court’s order. Thus, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. The motion

to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees is GRANTED.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-5078 Document: 01018453944 Date Filed: 07/08/2010 Page: 2