alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael F. Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated: November 14, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 December 13, 2023 

 Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group 

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Women in 

Aerospace Reception and Awards Dinner on December 13, 2023 

On December 13, 2023, the Women in Aerospace (WIA), a nonprofit organization under section 

501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host the 38th Annual Women in Aerospace Awards 

Dinner & Ceremony a cocktail reception followed by dinner at the Ritz-Carlton, Pentagon City, 

1250 South Hayes Street, Arlington, Virginia, from 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. WIA is in control of 

the organizing, planning, and sending of invitations to this event. The event honors women’s 

outstanding contributions to the aerospace community. 

Approximately 300 people are expected to attend this event. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, representatives of the 

U.S. legislative branch, state and local officials, representatives from the media, academia, 

industry, and international partner organizations. The estimated value of the reception and 

dinner, including all food and drinks, is approximately $200.00 for WIA Members and $250.00 

for Non-Members. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information 

regarding various NASA programs with attendees from other organizations. I find that these

event meets the requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. 

§2635.204(g). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel 

attend these events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange 

ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees — including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role in a 

matter affecting the interests of WIA may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. 

In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern 

that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

their duties.

However, NASA employees whose duties have a significant role in any matter affecting the 

interests of WIA, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating a Space Act 
2

Agreement should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether

they may accept the invitation for free attendance. 

Adam F. Greenstone
|                                      |         |                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                        |    | State or Sovereign Power of Incorporation |
| Merix Europe B.V.                         |    | Netherlands                               |
| Merix Asia, Inc.                          |    | Oregon                                    |
| Merix Caymans Holding Company Limited     |    | Cayman Islands                            |
| Merix Caymans Trading Company Limited     |    | Cayman Islands                            |
| Merix Singapore Sales Pte. Ltd.           |    | Singapore                                 |
| Merix U.K. Limited                        |    | United Kingdom                            |
| Merix Circuits Corp.                      |    | Canada                                    |
| Merix Holding (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.       |    | Singapore                                 |
| Merix Asia Limited                        |         | Hong Kong                                 |
| Merix Printed Circuits (Huizhou) Limited  |    | People’s Republic of China          |
| Merix Printed Circuits Technology Limited |    | People’s Republic of China          |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 67015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27673]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 67015]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2011-14 of September 3, 
                2010

                
Unexpected Urgent Refugee And Migration Needs 
                Resulting From Flooding InPakistan

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 
                Assistance Act of 1962 (the ``Act''), as amended (22 
                U.S.C. 2601(c)(1)), I hereby determine, pursuant to 
                section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the 
                national interest to furnish assistance under the Act 
                in an amount not to exceed $33 million from the United 
                States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund 
                for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent 
                refugee and migration needs, including by contributions 
                to international, governmental, and nongovernmental 
                organizations and payment of administrative expenses of 
                the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of 
                the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs 
                resulting from recent devastating flooding in Pakistan.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the  Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    WASHINGTON, September 3, 2010

[FR Doc. 2010-27673
Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### JAMES FISCHER v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*113)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,117,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,572,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                   501,685
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,606,293
<PP&E>                                      11,636,584
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,005,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,720,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,864,936
<BONDS>                                      5,039,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,130
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,297,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,720,143
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,697,745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,488,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,968,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               153,672
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,743,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (984,249)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,759,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,759,309)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 26, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

KENIQUE SMITH,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-3047

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-02375-JWL)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellant’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the

captioned appeal, this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

Each party will bear its own costs on appeal. A copy of this order will stand as the

mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3047 Document: 01018374530 Date Filed: 02/26/2010 Page: 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manolo Abreu, Appellant.

[786 NYS2d 920]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 24, 2003 *(People v Abreu,*303 AD2d 685 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 26, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Crane, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      31.2**


**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Ian T.
      Bothwell, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Penn Octane Corporation;





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material
      fact
      or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
      light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with
      respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4.  
       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in
      Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  
       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
      directors:





a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
                November 21, 2005/s/
                Ian T. BothwellIan
                T. BothwelChief
                Financial Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2426 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the treatment 

of payment under the medicare program for clinical laboratory tests 

furnished by critical access hospitals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2004 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the treatment of payment under the medicare program 

for clinical laboratory tests furnished by critical access 

hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Access to Clin5 ical Lab Services Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•S 2426 IS 

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT FOR CLINICAL LAB2 ORATORY TESTS FURNISHED BY CRITICAL 

3 ACCESS HOSPITALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(g)(4) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(g)(4)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘NO BENE7 FICIARY COST-SHARING FOR’’ and inserting ‘‘TREAT8 MENT OF’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen10 tence: ‘‘For purposes of the preceding sentence and 

11 section 1861(mm)(3), clinical diagnostic laboratory 

12 services furnished by a critical access hospital shall 

13 be treated as being furnished as part of outpatient 

14 critical access services without regard to whether— 

15 ‘‘(A) the individual with respect to whom 

16 such services are furnished is physically present 

17 in the critical access hospital at the time the 

18 specimen is collected; 

19 ‘‘(B) such individual is registered as an 

20 outpatient on the records of, and receives such 

21 services directly from, the critical access hos22 pital; or 

23 ‘‘(C) payment is (or, but for this sub24 section, would be) available for such services 

25 under the fee schedule established under section 

26 1833(h).’’. 
3 

•S 2426 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to cost reporting periods begin3 ning on or after October 1, 2003. 

Æ
#### Leida Cruz, Appellant, v Isabella Geriatric Center, Inc., Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 873]

*436Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered November 8, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she slipped and fell in a hole in front of defendant’s premises. Defendant’s evidence, however, established prima facie that, although its employees regularly maintained and inspected the area in question, it was without notice, either actual or constructive, of the complained-of hazard, and plaintiff made no evidentiary showing warranting a contrary inference *(see Strowman v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*252 AD2d 384 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2391

For the relief of Pongsakorn Kaewkornmuang. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2004

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Pongsakorn Kaewkornmuang.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 PONGSAKORN KAEWKORNMUANG. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Pongsakorn Kaewkornmuang shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•S 2391 IS 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Pongsakorn 

2 Kaewkornmuang enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), Pongsakorn 

4 Kaewkornmuang shall be considered to have entered and 

5 remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of 

6 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Pongsakorn Kaewkornmuang, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Government and Industry Collaboration Leads to First Air Taxi Delivery\u202f","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1CtJjC2UJo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/government-and-industry-collaboration-leads-to-first-air-taxi-delivery\/\">Government and Industry Collaboration Leads to First Air Taxi Delivery\u202f<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/government-and-industry-collaboration-leads-to-first-air-taxi-delivery\/embed\/#?secret=1CtJjC2UJo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Government and Industry Collaboration Leads to First Air Taxi Delivery\u202f” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1CtJjC2UJo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/joby-edwards-4_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Z.D.C., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0069

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 27, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Lynne Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.