alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS A RESTATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNT LABELED AS
"PRIMARY", AND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 25, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-25-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-25-1996
<CASH>                                          12,191
<SECURITIES>                                     7,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                        78
<INVENTORY>                                      6,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,921
<PP&E>                                         101,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,733
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,170
<SALES>                                        155,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,634
<CGS>                                          118,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.98
        

</TABLE>
! I I I 

B G E 

Equal 0 portunity 

grog rams 

George E. Reese 

Chief Financial General 

Officer Counsel 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Frankle 

Q 

I 

External 

Relations 

John 0. Schurnacher 

Q. 

9 

E 

a 

a 

s 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Aerospace Safety 

Advlsow Panel I II 

Administrator 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Admlnlstrator 

John R. Dailey (Acting) Associate Deputy Administrator John R. Dailey 

Assoc. Dep. Admlnlstrator (Tech) Michael I. Mott 

Chief En lneer 

Daniel R. hulviiie 

Chief Information Offker 

Lee 6. Hdcornb 

Chief Sclentlst 

Chlef(Techno1oglat Vacant) 

Samuel L. Venneri 

Administration 

u-uu Jeffrey E. Sunon (Acting) Deidre A. Lee Peggy Wilhide Alan M. Ladwig 

J 

W Inspector General 

Roberta L. Gross 

Ed Heffernan (Acting) 

Assurance 

I I 

Frederick Gregory 

Disadvantaged Microgravity 

Sciences and 

Utilization Applications 

Ralph C. llmnnas Arnauld E. Nicogossian 

Earth Science 

Ghassem Asrar 

Alphonso V. Daz 

I Space Flight 

George W.S. Awey 

I 

Space Center I Roy S. Estess 

Human Resources 

and Education 

Stanley S. Kask Jr. (Acting) 

Aeronautics and 

Transportation Space Science 

Ames Research 'Jet Propulsion 

Henty McDonald Edward Stone 

Headquarters - Operatfons 

Michael D. Christensen 

1 Langle?eFe;eanh I 

Jeremiah Creedon 

Dona!d J. Campbell 

as of May1 998 

'JPL is a contractor-operaled facility
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6923

WILLIAM A. FISHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-150)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability, Fisher's motions for bail

pending appeal, for retrial, and to call witnesses, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. Commonwealth, No. CA-96-150 (E.D. Va. May 10, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-70-2014]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Whiteman at                         *Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov*                         or (202) 482-0473.                    

Dated: October 1, 2014.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-24090 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Simcha Edell, Chief Financial Officer of Mazal Plant
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth
      and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








Dated:
      August 24, 2006





By: /s/
      Simcha Edell


Name:
      Simcha Edell


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ELIZABETH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 154 *N. J. Super.*291)
Exhibit
10.112


 


New
Warrant Program


 


Management
is asking the board to approve a new warrant program to incentivize and compensate the performance and retention of publishers,
in place of the existing such program adopted on March 10, 2019, by providing them with the opportunity to earn Maven stock based
on their performance (the “New Program”). The warrants under the New Program (“New Warrants”)
may be issued to existing publishers in order to augment their existing position as well as to new publishers, in each instance
for a number of shares deemed appropriate by management.


 


It
is intended that enterprise level publishers will not be eligible to participate in the program, although exceptions may be made.


 


The
New Program:


 


	 	● 	Warrants
    will be granted in batches twice per year (each a “Warrant Issuance Date”) – for example January
    1 and July 1. Each publisher will be granted a warrant as of the first Warrant Issuance Date following their “go live”
    date.
	 	 	 
	 	●	There
    will be three vesting dates for each warrant – each of the first three anniversaries of the Warrant Issuance Date (each
    a “Vesting Date”).
	 	 	 
	●	Warrant
    term is 5 years, subject to early termination in the event that the Publisher’s partner agreement is terminated.
	 	 
	●	Management
    proposed that the board approve a pool of up to 5 million shares for the New Warrant Program allowing management to issue
    warrants up that number without further approval.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2433

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow self-employed individuals to deduct health insurance costs in computing self-employment taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2004

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow selfemployed individuals to deduct health insurance costs 

in computing self-employment taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equity for Our Na5 tion’s Self Employed Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS IN 

7 COMPUTING SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162(l) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health 

10 insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended 
2

•S 2433 IS 

1 by striking paragraph (4) and by redesignating paragraph 

2 (5) as paragraph (4). 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### MARION E. FOLEY v. NORTHBROOK EXCESS AND SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to March 5, 2019 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 18

- 128 State v. Tiller

A

- 18

- 481 State v. Redmond

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.
Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of OurPets Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of OurPets Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    SCOTT R.
MENDES 
|BY SCOTT R. MENDES     
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 31, 2010

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OurPets Company and will be retained by OurPets Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**HMN FINANCIAL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Timothy P. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  3/25/2003 |                           | /s/ Timothy P. Johnson |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                  | Timothy P. Johnson,            |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                  | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK REISS.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DEREK BETHEA.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANTHONY CRAWFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CR-93-87, CA-97-305-F)

Submitted: December 9, 1997 Decided: January 22, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Crawford, Nos. CR-93-87; CA-97-305-F

(E.D.N.C. July 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |                                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial Officer
My Flight Log

Travel Dates Leaving From Traveling To Traveling by 

(airplane, car, bus) Reason for Travel


Travel Journal Page

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters

300 E. St., SW

Washington, DC 20024

www.nasa.gov/aeronautics

www.nasa.gov

NP-2023-12-3204-HQ
#### MYRON HOLLANDER v. HERITAGE MANOR TOWNHOUSES AT WAYNE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OncoVista Innovative
Therapies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J.
Michael Edwards, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the
consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the
dates presented and consolidated  results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
March 27, 2009





By:
                /s/ J. Michael
      EdwardsJ.
      Michael EdwardsChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and will be retained by OncoVista
Innovative Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2223 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2223

  To expand the list of entities eligible to establish and maintain a 
  qualified tuition program under section 529 of the Internal Revenue 
                             Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2004

  Mr. Daschle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the list of entities eligible to establish and maintain a 
  qualified tuition program under section 529 of the Internal Revenue 
                             Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL ELIGIBLE ENTITIES FOR QUALIFIED TUITION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 529 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, an eligible educational institution shall be 
deemed to include a corporation--
            (1) which is a transferee corporation (within the meaning 
        of section 150(d)(3) of such Code) of a corporation described 
        in section 150(d) of such Code, and
            (2) a majority of the outstanding stock of which is owned 
        by an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in section 
        4975(e)(7) of such Code).
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect with respect 
to any qualified tuition program established after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### JANNEY v. J.W. JONES LUMBER CO.

No. 492A01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 402

Motion by plaintiff and defendants to withdraw appeal allowed 18 December 2001.
#### Commonwealth for E. C. Sublett, *v.*W. H. Hudson.

Execution — Failure to Return — Insolvency of Debtor Wo Excuse — Penalty.

The fact that an execution debtor is insolvent, will absolve an officer from liability for the debt, but it cannot relieve him from the penalty for failure to return the execution.

APPEAL FROM! ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

October 3, 1867.

Opinion of the Court bt

Judge Hobertson:

It sufficiently appears that the last execution was delivered to the appellee for official action, and that, though the enforcement of it was suspended by statute until the 1st of March succeeding the return day, yet there never was any return of it. And while the established insolvency of the Execution debtor absolved the officer from liability for the debt, it cannot relieve him from the penalty prescribed for failure to return the execution.

Wherefore the judgment exonerating the appellee altogether is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new tria?.