alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2100

To amend title 10 United States Code, to increase the amounts of educational 

assistance for members of the Selected Reserve, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2004

Mr. MILLER (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10 United States Code, to increase the 

amounts of educational assistance for members of the 

Selected Reserve, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNTS OF EDUCATIONAL AS4 SISTANCE UNDER MONTGOMERY GI BILL FOR 

5 MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED RESERVE. 

6 (a) INCREASE IN RATES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2005 

7 THROUGH 2007.—Section 16131(b)(1) of title 10, United 

8 States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (A), 

9 (B), and (C) and inserting the following new subpara10 graphs: 
2

•S 2100 IS 

1 ‘‘(A) for each month of full-time pursuit of a 

2 program of education—

3 ‘‘(i) for months occurring during fiscal 

4 year 2004, $282; 

5 ‘‘(ii) for months occurring during fiscal 

6 year 2005, $332; 

7 ‘‘(iii) for months occurring during fiscal 

8 year 2006, $397; and 

9 ‘‘(iv) for months occurring during fiscal 

10 year 2007, $467; 

11 ‘‘(B) for each month of three-quarter-time pur12 suit of a program of education—

13 ‘‘(i) for months occurring during fiscal 

14 year 2004, $212; 

15 ‘‘(ii) for months occurring during fiscal 

16 year 2005, $242; 

17 ‘‘(iii) for months occurring during fiscal 

18 year 2006, $283; and 

19 ‘‘(iv) for months occurring during fiscal 

20 year 2007, $325; 

21 ‘‘(C) for each month of half-time pursuit of a 

22 program of education—

23 ‘‘(i) for months occurring during fiscal 

24 year 2004, $140; 
3

•S 2100 IS 

1 ‘‘(ii) for months occurring during fiscal 

2 year 2005, $160; 

3 ‘‘(iii) for months occurring during fiscal 

4 year 2006, $187; and 

5 ‘‘(iv) for months occurring during fiscal 

6 year 2007, $215; and’’. 

7 (b) SUSPENSION OF COST-OF-LIVING ADJUST8 MENT.—Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of section 

9 16131(b) of title 10, United States Code, no adjustment 

10 in the rates of educational assistance payable under such 

11 section, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, shall 

12 be made for fiscal year 2005, 2006, or 2007.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2100

ANGEL F. CORDERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-3019-2-18AJ, CA-99-2580-2-18AJ) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angel F. Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Angel F. Cordero appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting summary judgment to the Secretary of Transportation and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cordero v. Slater , Nos. CA-99-3019-2-18AJ; CA-99-2580-2-18AJ (D.S.C. July 28 & Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's unaudited financial statements for the three months ended June 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          69,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,478,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                   108,022
<INVENTORY>                                  1,801,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,642,319
<PP&E>                                       1,948,584
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,140,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,089,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,784,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,472,357
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,089,584
<SALES>                                      6,198,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,198,988
<CGS>                                        4,952,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,353,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (200,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,422
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (203,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (203,805)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2022

No. 04-22-00062-CR

Ricardo ARREOLA, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-05-0097-CRA

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 31, 2022, the district clerk filed the clerk’s record in this appeal. On June 7, 

2022, the district clerk filed the supplemental record that was ordered by this court.

On February 9, 2022, the court reporter filed the reporter’s record in this case. On June 

7, 2022, the reporter filed the supplemental record that was ordered by this court.

On July 11, 2022, Appellant Ricardo Arreola moved for this court to abate the appeal 

because he stated that his motion to dismiss and the related transcript were not made part of the 

record and that he received no response after requesting the items.

Abatement in this situation, however, is unnecessary. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). 

Therefore, we order the district clerk and the court reporter to file supplemental records 

within thirty days of this order containing the records requested by Appellant. See id. “The 

clerk may consult with the parties concerning the contents of the clerk’s record.” Id. R. 34.5(h). 

The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record will not be deemed filed for purposes of Rule 

38.6 (Time to File Briefs) until the revised record is submitted. See id. R. 38.6.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of July, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Order entered February 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00619-CV

LYNDON THOMPSON AND PAULA THOMPSON, Appellants

V.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIET FSB AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF 

THE RESIDENTAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00129-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ third motion for extension of time to file their 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 

6, 2023. Because the brief was first due November 30, 2022, we caution that 

failure to file the brief may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Gas Company as of June 30, 1997,
and the related consolidated statement of income for the six-month period
ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         107,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626
<INVENTORY>                                      5,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               282,323
<PP&E>                                       2,026,480
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,100,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,251,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,893
<BONDS>                                        310,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    345,000
<COMMON>                                       142,917
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,251,257
<SALES>                                        795,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               843,421
<CGS>                                          750,030<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Gas purchases + Operating expenses + Depreciation.
<F2>Income per share of common stock has been omitted because all common
     stock is owned by Phillips Petroleum Company.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IMNET
SYSTEMS, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,299,628
<SECURITIES>                                 5,350,077
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,644,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,748,432
<INVENTORY>                                  2,307,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,125,301
<PP&E>                                       9,790,609
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,950,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,561,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,114,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,984
<OTHER-SE>                                  68,349,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,561,571
<SALES>                                     24,043,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,153,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               632,792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,688,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,021,573)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,666,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,666,777)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMON SCOTT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-1139

(D.C. No. 1:08-CR-00287-REB-3)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

This criminal appeal is before the court based on a “motion to voluntarily dismiss

appeal” filed by court-appointed counsel on behalf of Appellant-Defendant Damon Scott.

See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); 10th Cir. R. 46.3(B). Attached to the “motion to voluntarily

dismiss” is a signed declaration by Defendant Scott requesting dismissal of his appeal. 

Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss is GRANTED. The

appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Cler

Appellate Case: 10-1139 Document: 01018457999 Date Filed: 07/15/2010 Page: 1
#### WOODWARD v. N.C. MGMT. CO.

No. 466P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 207

Petition by defendant-appellants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
[786 NYS2d 741]

#### In the Matter of Michael S. Wantuck (Admitted as Michael Sissine Wantuck), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

January 4, 2005

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City *(Raymond Vallejo*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Dwane Kent Smith*for respondent.

*179OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Michael S. Wantuck was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 15, 1991, under the name Michael Sissine Wantuck. At all times relevant to these proceedings, he maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now petitions this Court for an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that he has been disbarred upon conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e) *(see Matter of Hsu,*257 AD2d 309 [1999]).

On May 12, 2004, respondent pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the fourth degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.30, a class E felony, based upon his receipt of $12,018.75 in unemployment benefits to which he was not entitled in that he was working and receiving income during that time period. Therefore, Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) mandates that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys. The pendency of an appellate challenge to his criminal conviction is not a ground to delay this sanction *(see*22 NYCRR 603.12 [e]; *Matter of Mitchell,*40 NY2d 153, 157 [1976]); if his appeal is successful, the disciplinary sanction may be revoked *(see Matter of Miller,*246 AD2d 35, 36 [1998]).

Accordingly, the petition to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) should be granted.

Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 1

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make improvements in 
 the medicare program, to provide prescription drug coverage under the 
               medicare program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2003

 Mr. Frist (for himself, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Baucus) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make improvements in 
 the medicare program, to provide prescription drug coverage under the 
               medicare program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Drug 
and Medicare Improvement Act of 2003''.
    (b) Sense of the Congress.--It is the Sense of the Congress that 
the Congress should enact, and the President should sign, legislation 
to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make improvements in 
the medicare program and to provide prescription drug coverage under 
the medicare program.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         661,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,306,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,323,272
<PP&E>                                          76,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,151,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          531,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,736
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,359,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,151,685
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,723,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
THE MEETING WILL BE VIRTUAL ONLY - SEE DETAILS BELOW.

10:00 to 11:00 AM Annual Ethics Training (non-public)

11:00 to 11:30 AM Break

11:30 to 11:40 AM Welcome and Announcements

11:40 AM to 12:40 PM ARMD FY23 Budget Overview

12:40 to 1:40 PM Lunch (non-public)

1:40 - 3:00 PM Sustainable Flight National Partnership 

3:00 to 3:10 PM Break

3:10 to 4:40 PM Future Airspace Vision 

4:40 to 4:45 PM Public Comment Period

4:45 to 5:15 PM Committee Deliberations

5:15 to 5:30 PM Work Plan and Schedule Review

5:30 PM Adjourn

JOIN WEBEX MEETING https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/

27-Apr-22

Meeting number: 2764 831 0780 

Meeting password: M4MxhZBi@95

JOIN BY PHONE

US Toll: 1-415-527-5035 

Passcode: 2764 831 0780 

Wednesday, April 27 (Sessions are public except as noted)

NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda (FINAL)

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

NASA Headquarters
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1332 Lower Tribunal No. F15-8755

________________ Sir Michael A. Maps, Appellant,
vs. The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christina Marie DiRaimondo, Judge. Sir Michael A. Maps, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 12.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such
internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 30, 2010
    /s/ Raju VegesnaName:
    Raju VegesnaTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer