alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
www.nasa.gov

SPACE ENVIRONMENTS TESTING

MANAGEMENT OFFICE

Langley Research Center

Hampton, Virginia

Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas

Ames Research Center

Mountain View, California

 

Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland

Glenn Research Center

Cleveland, Ohio

Armstrong Test Facility

Sandusky, Ohio

Wallops Flight Facility

Wallops Island, Virginia

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Pasadena, California

Vertical Motion Simulator

25-Foot Space Simulator

Arc Jet Complex

Cockpit Motion Facility

Space Environments Complex Thermal Vacuum Facility 5 Thermal Vacuum Facility 6 

Thermal Vacuum Chamber A Thermal Vacuum Chamber B

Spacecraft Magnetic Test Facility

Armstrong Flight Research Center

Palmdale, California

Kennedy Space Center

Merritt Island, Florida

NASA Headquarters

Washington, D.C.

Stennis Space Center

Bay St. Louis, Mississippi

Michoud Assembly Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana

Marshall Space Flight Center

Huntsville, Alabama

X-Ray and Cryogenic Facility

White Sands Test Facility

Las Cruces, New Mexico
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2021-10-15 19:15:56","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["AFRC","ARC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["1","10","1","5","71","8","33","14","4","12","1"," ","7","3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["1","11","5","22","66","8","36","16","5","11","1"," ","10","2"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" ","1"," "," ","34","1","10","9","2","9","1"," "," ","1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q4"}
#### In the Matter of Chyna J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[786 NYS2d 744]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*354The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible testimony disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE SILVER KEY MINING COMPANY
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER>   1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       256,300
<OTHER-SE>                                    (172,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.00)



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oscar Ferrero, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 367]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered December 12, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that, in cross-examining defendant, the prosecutor misrepresented the contents of a videotaped statement by defendant that was not placed in evidence does not warrant reversal. The court provided sufficient relief by narrowly tailoring the permissible scope of inquiry, and the ensuing cross-examination did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see *People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, 143 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]).

Without objection, a photograph of the scene was introduced into evidence. The manner in which the prosecutor used this photograph in examining a witness could not have misled the jury as to the actual position of a certain taxicab at the time of the incident (see *People v Cruz,*5 AD3d 190 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 798 [2004]). It was made clear to the jury that a car in the photograph was not the taxi whose position was at issue, and that the depicted vehicle’s position did not represent that of the taxicab at the time of the crime.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

FRANCISCO EFRAIN ARZOLA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

WILLIAM HENRY, Magistrate Judge, 

Hobbs NM, Lea County, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 14-2198 

(D.C. No. 1:14-CV-00318-MCA-KK) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1. 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

February 19, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2198 Document: 01019387877 Date Filed: 02/19/2015 Page: 1
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

           Certification of Senior Vice President and CFO pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                           Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Howard, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ John A. Howard, Jr.
-----------------------
John A. Howard, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 2.2


November 14, 2000

VIA FAX AND U. S. MAIL

Mr. Richard Tipton
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Water Pik Technologies, Inc.
23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 246
Newport Beach, CA  92660

RE:  TAX SHARING AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN ALLEGHENY TELEDYNE
     INCORPORATED AND WATER PIK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 29, 1999 ("TAX
     AGREEMENT") AND SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
     ALLEGHENY TELEDYNE INCORPORATED, TDY HOLDINGS, LLC, TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES,
     INC. AND WATER PIK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 29, 1999
     ("DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT")

Dear Rick:

This letter will confirm our agreement under the definition of Public Offering
in Section 1.1 of the Tax Agreement that the Public Offering (as therein
defined) shall be the equity offering of the type and in the amount set forth
in, and applicable to Water Pik Technologies under, the supplemental letter
ruling issued by the Internal Revenue Service on July 12, 2000. This will
further confirm that the term "Ruling Request," as defined in Section 1.1 of the
Tax Agreement and Section 1.63 of the Distribution Agreement, is deemed to
include all amendments and supplements we file after November 29, 1999,
including the supplemental ruling request submitted to the Internal Revenue
Service on June 8, 2000.

We further agree that the requirements in the Section 4.01(b) of the
Distribution Agreement regarding the filing of the Public Offering Registration
Statement are hereby waived and that, in accordance with Section 4.01(a) of such
Agreement and Section 5.2 (d) of the Tax Agreement, the Public Offering (as
redefined) need not be completed until April 30, 2001. We also agree that the
requirements in Sections 4.01(c), (f) and (g) of the Distribution Agreement may
not be necessary in the event that Water Pik Technologies undertakes a private
placement to fulfill its obligation to complete the Public Offering (as
redefined).

Please signify your acknowledgement of and agreement to the foregoing by signing
the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to me. A self-addressed
envelope is enclosed for your convenience.

Sincerely,


Jon D. Walton
JDW:gr

cc: R. D. West

Acknowledged and agreed to:

Water Pik Technologies, Inc.


By:
    --------------------------------
Name:
Title:

Date:
     -------------------------------
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23-2 880 LT Case No. 2021

- DP

- 000120 -A

_____________________________ J. W ., F A THER of K.W ., a C HILD , A ppellant,

v. D EPARTMENT o f C HILDRE N and F AMILIES , A ppellee.

_____________________________
O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Michael Kalil , Judge

. J ennifer Cogdill , Fleming Island , for Appellant.
S arah J. Rumph , of Children’s Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Ta lla hassee , for Appellee.
S ara Elizabeth Goldfarb , Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee , Assistant Director o f Appeals, of Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

April 1, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFI RMED

.2 W ALLIS , L AMBERT , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .

___ __________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer**

 

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

    (i)          the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

    (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: June 10, 2008 |
|----------------------|

 

| /s/ Sandra B. Cochran                 |
|---------------------------------------|
| Sandra B. Cochran                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form S-8 of China America Holdings, Inc., SEC File No. 333-144412, and the related prospectus, of our audit report dated December 22, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010 and the consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows of China America Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 which is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China America Holdings, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2010.





/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP


Certified Public Accountants








Boca Raton, Florida


December 22, 2010
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN MOORE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

GLAXO SMITHKLINE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1237

(D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00429-ZLW)

 (D. Colo.)

ORDER

In a July 1, 2010 Show Cause Order, Appellant-Plaintiff John Moore was directed to

file a jurisdictional memorandum brief, by July 21, 2010, addressing a specifically-identified

appellate jurisdictional issue. No jurisdictional memorandum brief was filed. Moreover, the

various documents received by this court on July 21, 2010 from Plaintiff do not constitute

a jurisdictional memorandum brief in response to the show cause order.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. See 10th Cir. R.

42.1. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1237 Document: 01018477809 Date Filed: 08/16/2010 Page: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2057 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2057

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United 
States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the 
  members in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and 
 Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include 
                            domestic travel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION COSTS INCURRED BY 
              MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ON REST AND 
              RECUPERATION LEAVE.

    The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse a member of the United 
States Armed Forces for transportation expenses incurred by such member 
for one round trip by such member between two locations within the 
United States in connection with leave taken under the Central Command 
Rest and Recuperation Leave Program during the period beginning on 
September 25, 2003, and ending on December 18, 2003.

            Passed the Senate March 3, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2057

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United 
States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the 
  members in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and 
 Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include 
                            domestic travel.
```
NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda
	

Thursday, March 26, 2015
	

NASA Headquarters
	

300 E Street, SW
	

Washington, DC
	

Room 6E40
	

Thursday, March 26 (Sessions are public except as noted)
	

9:00 am to 9:10 am Welcome and announcements
�

9:10 am to 9:30 am Work Plan and Schedule Discussion
�

9:30 am to 10:30 am Budget Discussion
�

10:30 am to 12:00 pm Strategic Thrust Review - Innovation in 

Commercial Supersonic Aircraft 

12:00 pm to 1:00 pm Lunch (non-public) 

1:00 pm to 2:00 pm Safety Program Reorganization Implementation 

2:00 pm to 3:00 pm ARMD Investment Strategy 

3:00 pm to 4:00 pm Scope, roles, and approach for cross-agency 

aviation issues 

4:00 pm to 4:45 pm Committee Deliberations
�

4:45pm to 5:00 pm Public Comment Period
�

5:00 PM Adjourn
�
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J I NG HO NG L UA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70064 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 440- 485 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J i nghong L ua n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED SEP 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70064 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility f in d in g s , Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 1153, 1156 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility d e te rm in a tio n . See Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1071 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyf

i ndi ng s upport e d bys ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e ba s e d on di s c r e pa nc i e s be tw e e n pe t i t i one r ’ s t e s t i m onya nd de c l ar a t i on) . I n the abs e nc e of c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , L ua n f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um orw i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l. Se e Farah , 348 F . 3d a t1156. L ua n’ s C A T c l a i m a l s o f a i l s be c aus e i ti s ba s e d on the s a m e t e s t i m onythe agencyfoun d n otcr edi bl e, and L uan d oes notpo i ntt o any other e vi dence that show s i ti s m ore l i kel y than n othe w ou l d b e t ortured i f r eturned t o C hi na. Se e i d. at 1156- 57. P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52

                  [INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]




                                                                  March 23, 2000



Telocity, Inc.
10355 North De Anza Boulevard
Cupertino, California 95014

     RE: CONCURRENCE WITH INFORMATION USED IN PROSPECTUS

To whom it may concern:

     We make reference to your request for concurrence with statements made in
Telocity's prospectus regarding statistics obtained from our company. Telocity
has filed a Registration Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") to register its shares for an initial public offering. You have
sought our concurrence with statements made in your prospectus regarding
statistics obtained from our Company.

     We hereby concur with the attached statements in Telocity's S-1 using
information obtained from our company.

                                        /s/ [SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE]
                                        -------------------------
                                        Name:
                                        Title:
<PAGE>   2
                             Exhibit 10.52 (cont'd)

Page 35
According to IDC, from 1999 through 2003, the annual growth of U.S. households
with Internet access is projected to be 16%, with over 65 million users by the
end of 2003.

Page 36
IDC predicts that consumer purchases of goods and services over the Internet
will increase from $26 billion in 1999 to approximately $119 billion in 2003.

According to IDC, the total DSL capable access lines in the U.S. will grow from
an estimated 20.8 million in 1999 to 67.2 million in 2003.