alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

NATHANIEL JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

RANDY WORKMAN, Warden OSP;

JUSTIN JONES, Director ODOC;

HARRY READING, Unit Manager;

WILLIAM TAYLOR, Unit Manager;

MR. JONES, Chief of Security, OSP, 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-7023

(D.C. No. 6:09-CV-00166-RAW-SPS)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 

10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-7023 Document: 01018457726 Date Filed: 07/15/2010 Page: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2255 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 577
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2255

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, as the ``Maxine S. 
              Postal United States Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2004

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, as the ``Maxine S. 
              Postal United States Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAXINE S. POSTAL UNITED STATES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Maxine S. 
Postal United States Post Office Building.

                                                       Calendar No. 577

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, as the ``Maxine S. 
              Postal United States Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008
of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) upon my best knowledge and belief
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|                    |                                                                                                                | 
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: May 14, 2008 | /s/ Edward J. Quilty                                                                                           | 
|                    | Edward J. Quilty
        Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24316]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-2-000]

UIF GP, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on October 3, 2014, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2), UIF GP, LLC (UIF) filed a 
petition for declaratory order requesting that the Commission: (1) 
Disclaim jurisdiction over UIF as a public utility under section 201(e) 
of the Federal Power Act (FPA) and (2) disclaim jurisdiction over 
future transfers of the Class A-1 Interests or Class B Interests in 
Neptune Regional Transmission System, LLC under section 203(a)(1) of 
the FPA., as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 3, 2014.

    Dated: October 6, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24316 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2277 

To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 

arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 

within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 1, 2004 

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), 

to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in 

all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River 

Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA4 MARICOPA INDIAN RESERVATION CON5 TRACTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of Novem7 ber 2, 1966 (25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence— 
2 

•S 2277 IS 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that 

2 follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting 

4 land’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and 

7 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 

8 leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such 

9 Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall take effect as if included in the Indian 

12 Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encourage13 ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–179). 

Æ
EXHIBIT 13

Ultrapar Participações S.A. and Subsidiaries

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Thilo Mannhardt, the Chief Executive Officer, and
André Covre, the Chief Financial Officer of Ultrapar Participações S.A., each certifies that, to the best of their respective knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultrapar Participações S.A.

São Paulo, April 30, 2014



|                            |  |                        
|--------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|ULTRAPAR PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Thilo Mannhardt    
|Name:                       |  | Thilo Mannhardt        
|Title:                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

São Paulo, April 30, 2014



|       |  |                                               
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ André Covre                               
|Name:  |  | André Covre                                   
|Title: |  | Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1Q 1998
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          95,873
<SECURITIES>                                    62,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,933
<INVENTORY>                                     48,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,897
<PP&E>                                          82,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,316
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,232
<SALES>                                         82,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,375
<CGS>                                           35,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,934
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,191
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
PORTAGE PARTNERS, LTD.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY


                                                            (Deficit)
                              Common   Add'tnl    Accumulated      Total
                              Stock      Paid         During            Stock-
Paid-in                   Shares      In           Development     holder's
                             Amount    Capital       Stage              Equity


August 20, 1999     2,500,000
Founders shares     $2,500      $75            $  -                $2,575


August 20, 1999
Shares issued      2,000,000
Stock dividend      2,000,                        (2,000)                  -

Net (loss)
August 18, 1999
(inception) to
June 30, 2000                                          -                      -

Balance,
June 30, 2000      4,500,000
                            $4,500       $75          $(2,000)           $2,575

Net (loss)
For the year ended
June 30, 2001                                           (3,775)         (3,775)


Balance,           4,500,000
June 30, 2001       4,500            75             (5,775)          (1,200)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2002                                                (687)        (687)

Balance,          4,500,000
June 30, 2002       4,500             75               (6,462)      (1,887)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2003                                               (460)      (460)
                       4,500,000
                          $4,500            $75           $(6,922)     $(2,347)

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
National Aeronautics ar

Space Administrati

42
In 2017, the NASA Transition Authorization Act was signed
into law. Part of the provisions of this law include the
“To Research, Evaluate, Assess, and Treat Astronauts Act,”
also referred to as the “TREAT Astronauts Act.” TREAT
authorizes NASA to monitor and diagnose potential
conditions and treat conditions associated with spaceflight.

What you need te know about . _.

a The TREAT Astronauts Act

{, WHAT TREAT MEANS TO FORMER ASTRONAUTS:

+ Amore comprehensive program of monitoring, diagnosis
and treatment services to current and former astronauts.

- Potential for early detection of health conditions that may
be associated with spaceflight or spaceflight training to
develop a richer evidence base of occupational health data.

+ Contribute to an improved understanding of the long-term impacts
of spaceflight for future crews, vehicles and exploration missions.

AM | ELIGIBLE FOR COVERAGE UNDER TREAT?

YES... NO...
+ If you are a former United * Other U.S. government employees
States Government astronaut + Commercial spaceflight astronauts SF | os
or payload specialist who has who were never employed by NASA et >”

+ International partner astronauts
+ Employees of a foreign government
+ Private individuals or tourists

fl FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:

Q. Does TREAT cover conditions not associated with spaceflight?
A. No, TREAT only covers treatments for conditions that NASA
has determined are associated with spaceflight.
Q. Who determines what conditions are associated with
spaceflight?
A. The NASA Administrator delegates this authority to the
NASA Chief Health & Medical Officer (CHMO).
Q. Does TREAT coverage replace my health benefits plan as my
primary insurance provider?
A. No, health plans typically exclude occupational conditions. TREAT
covers occupational conditions when NASA is a secondary payer.
Q. How do | access services covered through TREAT?
A. Access to services are under the JSC Flight Medicine Clinic.

For expanded FAQs go to https://www.nasa.gov/hhp/treat-act-faqs

flown in space.
+ Participation is voluntary.

mai the TREAT Astronauts Act website at www.nasa.gov/hhp/treat-act.
To access services, contact the Johnson Space Center Flight Medicine at 281-483-7
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Hypersonic Technology Project Overview","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4NoqEXeYr0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/about-hypersonic-technology-project\/\">Hypersonic Technology Project Overview<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/about-hypersonic-technology-project\/embed\/#?secret=4NoqEXeYr0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Hypersonic Technology Project Overview” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4NoqEXeYr0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/fast-faster-fastest.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":420}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH MORGAN.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

p0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144961

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144961

COA: 306929

Macomb CC: 2010

- 000721

- FH

MYRON ODELL BANKS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anne Will,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03483-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8401 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8401 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2