alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rodger E. Rees, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Rodger E. Rees                                    May 1, 2006
------------------------                              -----------
Rodger E. Rees                                            Date
Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

s0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137966 

THE BEHLER-YOUNG COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137966 

 COA: 277775 

Genesee CC: 04-080526-CZ 

A.C. BEAUDRY, INC., DONALD, A. 

BEAUDRY, and KATHLEEN BEAUDRY, 

Defendants, 

and 

ROBERT L. POMEROY and 

PEGGY POMEROY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE TRUSTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              98
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    98
<PP&E>                                          87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,939
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,165
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 9, 2009

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

MARQUIS GARRETT, Inmate, Larned

Correctional Facility; SHELLEY

LAURENT, Captain on Duty, Larned

Correctional Mental Health Facility;

WILLIAM H. BAIR, Captain, Larned

Correctional Mental Health Facility;

JOHN WELSH, Larned Correctional

Mental Health Facility, a/k/a 1213 for

Assistance; TIM EASLEY, Security

Officer, Larned Correctional Mental

Health Facility; KAREN ROHLING,

Warden, Larned Correctional Mental

Health Facility; (FNU) (LNU), Three

Members, Segregation Review Board,

Larned Correctional Mental Health

Facility, 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-3091

(D.C. No. 5:10-CV-03051-SAC)

(D. of Kansas)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R

42.1. 3.3(B).

Appellate Case: 10-3091 Document: 01018429762 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 Page: 1
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3091 Document: 01018429762 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 Page: 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00791

- CV

TALISMAN ENERGY USA, INC

. ,

Appellant

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC , Matrix Petroleum Holdings, LLC, and JAR Resources Holdings, L.P. (Cross

- Appellants),

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL Honorable Russel Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 26 , 2016, appellees filed their brief in this accelerated appeal, along with a motion to dismiss th e a ppeal as moot. It is ORDERED that appellant file a response addressing the issue of mootness within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The cross

- appeal briefing schedule is suspended pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at June 30, 2000, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  for the six months  ended June 30,
2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,510,870
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,247
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         26,572,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,195,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,740,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,537,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,740,723
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,958,390
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,559,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,559,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,559,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. has an unclassified
balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown  above for  current  assets and
current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.39
 ViewCast Corporation
2007 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan
 Laurie Latham
   
  Quarterly Component
 Revenue
  Profit
   Annual Component
 Revenue
  Profit
  Example:
 Q1
    
    
    Q2
    
    
    Q3
    
    
    Q4
    
    
    TotalPlanRevenue
    
    
    4,625,000
    
    
    
    5,225,000
    
    
    
    6,100,000
    
    
    
    7,020,000
    
    
    
    22,970,000Profit
    
    
    159,834
    
    
    
    -58,157
    
    
    
    354,300
    
    
    
    771,771
    
    
    
    1,227,748ActualRevenue
    
    
    4,700,000
    
    
    
    5,300,000
    
    
    
    6,000,000
    
    
    
    7,500,000
    
    
    
    23,500,000Profit
    
    
    175,000
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    355,000
    
    
    
    850,000
    
    
    
    1,380,000% of Plan AchievedRevenue
    
    
    101.6
    %
    
    
    101.4
    %
    
    
    98.4
    %
    
    
    106.8
    %
    
    
    102.3
    %Profit
    
    
    109.5
    %
    
    
    0.0
    %
    
    
    100.2
    %
    
    
    110.1
    %
    
    
    112.4
    %




---



##### 



Q1
    
    
    Q2
    
    
    Q3
    
    
    Q4
    
    
    TotalQuarterly Bonus
Potential at 100%Revenue
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    12,825Profit
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    3,206.25
    
    
    
    12,825Total
    
    
    6,412.50
    
    
    
    6,412.50
    
    
    
    6,412.50
    
    
    
    6,412.50
    
    
    
    25,650Quarterly Bonus EarnedRevenue
    
    
    3,258.24
    
    
    
    3,252.27
    
    
    
    0.00
    
    
    
    3,425.48
    
    
    
    9,936.00Profit
    
    
    3,510.48
    
    
    
    0.00
    
    
    
    3,212.58
    
    
    
    3,531.25
    
    
    
    10,254.31Total
    
    
    6,768.72
    
    
    
    3,252.27
    
    
    
    3,212.58
    
    
    
    6,956.73
    
    
    
    20,190.30Annual Bonus
Potential at 100%Revenue
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12,825.00Profit
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12,825.00Total
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    25,650.00Annual Bonus EarnedRevenue
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    13,120.92Profit
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    14,415.42Total
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    27,536.34
  Agreement and Acknowledgement of Receipt
  By: /s/ George Platt
  I , Laurie L. Latham, hereby acknowledge receipt of my 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan.
 /s/ Laurie L. Latham
    
    
    March 7, 2007Signature
    
    
    Date
 2
**Exhibit 21****Subsidiaries of Registrant**           **Date and % of Voting**      **Shares, Partnership**      **Interests, Voting Trust**    **Year &** **Certificates, Capital**  **Name & Address** **State Inc.** **Contributions** **Description of Activity**Home Federal Savings Bank 1934 6/29/94 Federally Chartered Stock1016 Civic Center Drive NW Federal HMN owns 100% of voting Savings BankRochester, MN 55901 Charter shares         Osterud Insurance Agency, Inc. 1983 12/1983 Investment products andDBA Home Federal Investment Svcs. MN Bank owns 100% financial planning1016 Civic Center Drive NW     Rochester, MN 55901       Security Finance Corporation 1929 12/29/95 Corporation invests in1016 Civic Center Drive NW MN HMN owns 100% of voting Securities, loans and real estateRochester, MN 55901   shares
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1659

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 57 Old Tappan Road in Tappan, New York, as the ``John G. Dow Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2003

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 57 Old Tappan Road in Tappan, New York, as the ``John G. Dow Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN G. DOW POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 57 Old Tappan Road in Tappan, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John G. Dow Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the John G. Dow 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### JOSEPH STUPAR v. SAUL N. ISRAEL.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION v. PASSAIC GENERAL HOSPITAL.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*486)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Nikolette Ledesma and Elsa Estrada v. City of Houston

Appellate case number: 01-19-00034-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-84026

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 8, 2020

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 49.7.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, 

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: June 10, 2021
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141772

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141772 COA: 296087 Oakland CC: 2006-209453-FH KELLY LEE POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 28, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2022 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2022

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in 
   Carbondale, Illinois the ``Senator Paul Simon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in 
Carbondale, Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Senator 
Paul Simon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCE.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator Paul Simon 
Federal Building.

            Passed the Senate March 12, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2022

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in 
   Carbondale, Illinois the ``Senator Paul Simon Federal Building''.
```
#### In the Matter of Cleveland R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 201]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kangs County (Hepner, J.), dated July 21, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 23, 2002, made after a hearing, inter alia, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and adjourning the matter in contemplation of dismissal, and upon the granting of the presentment agency’s application to restore the matter to the calendar, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with *569the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of placement has expired *(see Matter of Shanita V,*7 AD3d 804 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is dismissed.

The Family Court erred in granting the presentment agency’s application to restore the instant case to the calendar after the six-month time period specified in the order of adjournment in contemplation of dismissal dated May 23, 2002 (hereinafter the ACD), had expired. Family Court Act § 315.3 states that “[i]f the proceeding is not restored, the petition is, at the expiration of the order, deemed to have been dismissed by the court in furtherance of justice.”

Although the presentment agency sought to restore the case to the calendar one day before the ACD was set to expire, the Family Court did not grant that application until a later date. Since the Family Court failed to restore the case to the calendar within the six-month period specified in the ACD, any subsequent action by the Family Court on the application to restore was a nullity *(see Matter of Kenyetta D.,*188 AD2d 830, 831 [1992]). Therefore, the Family Court should have deemed the petition to have been dismissed in furtherance of justice *(see*Family Ct Act § 315.3). Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avici Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul F. Brauneis, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    PAUL F.
BRAUNEISPaul F. BrauneisChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice Presidentof Finance and Administration and TreasurerMarch 15, 2006