alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1724

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel 

assemblies for use in LCD projection type televisions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 14, 2003

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Display 

(LCD) panel assemblies for use in LCD projection type 

televisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LCD PANEL ASSEMBLIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.85.24 LCD panel assemblies for use in 

LCD projection type televisions (provided for in subheading 9013.80.90) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•S 1724 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1 min read

# June 1965 – Gemini IV Performed First Extravehicular Activity

### NASA

Jun 01, 1965

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

Gemini IV performed the first extravehicular activity. Astronaut Edward H. White II had the privilege of sharing his one-of-a-kind experience via satellite to the world.

› Gemini: Stepping Stone to the Moon› SCaN History of the 1960’s
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         136,470
<SECURITIES>                                    62,116
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,540
<INVENTORY>                                     92,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               567,810
<PP&E>                                         126,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 679,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   679,235
<SALES>                                      1,782,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,782,653
<CGS>                                        1,505,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,505,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               223,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,246
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID PAUL HEALY

,

Appellant,

v.

SIMONE BARRON

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 0 27

- CV

Appeal from the

352 nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 352

- 286480

- 16 )

O R D E R

This Court has received and filed the United States Bankruptcy Court’s suggestion of

bankruptcy stating that Appellee, Simon Barron, has filed for b ankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the

Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, any further action in this appeal is automatically

stayed. Under these circumstances, and for administrative purposes, it is ORDERED that this

appeal is removed from the Court’s docket and abated. The appeal will be reinstated upon proper

motion showing that the stay has been lifted and specify ing the action required by this Court.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of March , 20 2 1.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32**

Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
*MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") that the Annual Report
of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at
the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such
period.

|Date:   May 31, 2005 | By: | /s/ David W. HeeterDavid W. HeeterPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:   May 31, 2005 | By: | /s/ Timothy J. McArdleTimothy J. McArdleTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of
income for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. for the three months
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,047,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,485,938
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,795,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,621,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,627,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,621,162
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,668
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                824,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            824,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   824,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: September 9, 2010





/s/ Clyde B. AndersonClyde B. AndersonChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 23, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00898-CV 

ECKITY CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, Appellant 

V. 

JASON MICHAEL SPENCER, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01927 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Evans, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant informs the Court 

that it no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

170898F.P05 

 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ECKITY CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, 

Appellant 

No. 05-17-00898-CV V. 

JASON MICHAEL SPENCER, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01927. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Bridges and Evans participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee JASON MICHAEL SPENCER recover his costs of this 

appeal from appellant ECKITY CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC. 

Judgment entered February 23, 2018.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2228

To authorize the issuance of a certificate of documentation with appropriate 

endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries for 

the vessel CROYANCE. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2004

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To authorize the issuance of a certificate of documentation 

with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 

coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel CROYANCE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION FOR THE 

4 VESSEL CROYANCE. 

5 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine 

6 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of 

7 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 

8 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United 

9 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
2

•S 2228 IS 

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries 

3 for the vessel CROYANCE.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended April 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,083,714
<SECURITIES>                                       993
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,005,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                   248,256
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,053,629
<PP&E>                                       7,189,122
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,773,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,634,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,994,009
<BONDS>                                      4,051,683<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,914
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,219,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,634,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,317,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,833,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,992,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                26,333<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                310,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                   153,985
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            156,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   156,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<FN>
<F1>Includes current portion of $1,668,958.
<F2>Also included in "Other Expenses" above.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### THOMAS J. SMITH v. HOWARD D. SMITH, JR.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40063

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE HOMERO CAVAZOS-ORTIZ,

also known as Juan Jose Cavazos,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-306-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Homero Cavazos-Ortiz pleaded guilty to being an illegal

alien who had been previously arrested and deported and who,

without the consent of the Attorney General, was found to be in

the United States unlawfully, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He was sentenced to 51 months’ imprisonment. Cavazos-Ortiz

appeals his sentence, arguing that district court erred in

including his 1993 guilty-plea conviction for making false

statements in computing his criminal history score because the 
No. 98-40063

-2-

conviction was obtained in violation of his fundamental right to

counsel. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and

conclude that the district court did not plainly err in including

Cavazos-Ortiz’s 1993 guilty-plea conviction in the computation of

Cavazos-Ortiz’s criminal history score. United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc); United

States v. Haymer, 995 F.2d 550, 552 (5th Cir. 1993). CavazosOrtiz’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
#### Workers' Compensation Board of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Rizzi, Doing Business as Oregon Deli, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 905]

In an action pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 26 in which a clerk’s judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 20, 2003, was entered against the defendant, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered March 16, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate the clerk’s judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Workers’ Compensation Law § 26 provides that upon the filing of a certified copy of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding compensation, “judgment must be entered in the supreme court by the clerk of such county in conformity therewith immediately upon such filing,” and that “[s]uch judg*609ment shall be entered in the same manner, have the same effect and be subject to the same proceedings as though rendered in a suit duly heard and determined by the supreme court, except that no appeal may be taken therefrom.” The defendant’s contention that entry of the clerk’s judgment was barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in CPLR 214 (2) is without merit. That limitations period applies only to actions commenced to enforce other judgments, whereas the entry of the judgment here was merely a ministerial act by the County Clerk, and no further court action was necessary to obtain the judgment. The Legislature has chosen not to place a time restriction upon the entry of a judgment (see *Funk v Barry,*89 NY2d 364, 368 [1996]; see *also Sarasota, Inc. v Finkel,*11 AD3d 407 [2004]).

The defendant’s claim that the award was incorrectly calculated is not properly before this Court, as it was raised for the first time in his reply brief (see *Coppola v Coppola,*291 AD2d 477 [2002]; *Matter of American Cyanamid Co. [Lederle Labs] v Board of Assessors of Town of Orangetown,*243 AD2d 630 [1997]), and the defendant stated in an affidavit in the Supreme Court that he was not challenging the determinations or awards made by the plaintiff upon which the clerk’s judgment was entered.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Smith, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60294 Conference Calendar

__________________ JAMES C. METCALF, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus M. L. McMILLIAN, GRAY EVANS, EARL TATE, YELLIE GRAMMENS, ANN LEE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:93cv327-B-D

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James C. Metcalf filed a pro se , in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he was improperly confined to administrative segregation; that various state officials conspired against him because of his political beliefs; and that he was sentenced without due process. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous.No. 95-60294 -2-
The Due Process Clause does not create a liberty interest in a specific custody classification, although a state may create a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause through the enactment of statutory or regulatory procedures. Hewitt v. Helms , 459 U.S. 460, 466-69 (1983). Under Mississippi law, Metcalf had no right to a particular classification. Miss. Code Ann. §§ 47-5-99 - 47-5-103 (1993); Tubwell v. Griffith , 742 F.2d 250, 253 (5th Cir. 1984).
In Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300-01 (1995), the Supreme Court stated that the reviewing court should consider the nature of the challenged state action and whether it involved such a significant departure from normal prison conditions that the state might have conceivably created a liberty interest. Metcalf's initial confinement in administrative segregation as an escape risk is not an "atypical and significant hardship" which would give rise to a protected liberty interest. Id . at 2300. Metcalf has not raised or briefed his claims that state officials conspired against him because of his political beliefs or that he was sentenced without due process. Therefore, these claims are considered abandoned. Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex. , 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993) (issues not raised or briefed are considered abandoned).
AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14498-001]

                    1. By letter filed September 2, 2014 and supplemented on October 3, 2014, Lucid Energy, Inc. and The City of Portland Water Bureau informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing for the Conduit 3 Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 14498, originally issued June 3, 2013,[1]                                          has been transferred from Lucid Energy, Inc. and The City of Portland Water Bureau as co-exemptees to Conduit 3, LLC and The City of Portland Water Bureau as co-exemptees. The new co-exemptee is wholly owned by Lucid Energy, Inc. The proposed project would be located on The City of Portland Water Bureau's Conduit 3 pipeline, an existing 50-inch diameter water supply pipeline, in the City of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon. The transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.                

2. Conduit 3, LLC and The City of Portland Water Bureau are now the co-exemptees of the Conduit 3 Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 14498. All correspondence should be forwarded to: Mr. Greg Semler, President and CEO, Lucid Energy, Inc. 2420 NE Sandy Blvd., Suite 203, Portland, OR 97232.

Dated: October 7, 2014.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             143 FERC ¶ 62,164, Order Granting Exemption from Licensing (Conduit).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2014-24344 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P