alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS AUSTIN

**GUAl.DC.hUNN mwmn** **” ououL** Catmty Superintendent. Eanh Trustee aballbe prifa Fou2 iM.lars ($4) per day for the tim

t0 be paid out sf tfle stete ona couty AO& able **i6OhOOl** %Wiaby **W5T-PRt** dra’m **011** the **OraeX Ol**  **the** COUAt;P **bUp3riIIt%nbfit $SLd**  61g~1(3a by tho Preafdent Of the 3OaXa Of COUAtySohO **Trustoe5,** 

### slter apprboal or tic aa~ount, properly morn to by th6 Pmeiaent or the iaoaxa of County 5ehool Trus~oas. 

## w3o.lar znall OaliAtlQ~ fa this Gtate bavlng h populatltm gt not l*iw than twentythrsiv th0uesnd ana five (23,005) ROF 330x0 then tmntpthme thoua6uka m0~auig to tha.i.aftt avf3ii tares huarea (23,300), abh rsa63ral iitum0 08 **tiilme now**  **exfotn** or nay hereerter f&et, the 

### County 5chool Trustees ehaSS, hold rasat3sgs **once** each nronth 01%

the first kiimdoy 3%e&ah iwith, or ~8 BOOA thorcsftcf sa prtMAe~bZLeB) **or** et silo& other tfn8s whea~anllea by the PXMalattAtof the isO8Xd of County sahocl 

## Trustees, OF

## at the loetunca of tmy 6nr%e(3) zitib&re or aeia DoaHt ana the County Sugerintcnacnt; t&6 ifioetin~ pleae to be 

## at the oounty sect cdl ti t&a off%es ot the **County Supsrfntan&mt,**  or at a&ahother ;plaoe in t&a Gcmtg Courhouse aa tf&y

## b% aati&aated by the 

## b?SiaOAtof mid Board 

## orcounty Yahool Trustew. &ah Count clahcol ?ru&ae shall bo psld F&m uousxs ( ,) p6~ 

## a8gfor the tiatp 8psnt 3.~ at-

iif tanding swh meetSnga, 

## not to weed fifteen **(15) aayo**  **LA eny**  **one** yew. **iiuab** aoolptxmetion shall btspaid out of tho aohbol &SdnfJrtatretiOA ma of eaah county by **W5XZ%AtiI** drawn egeinst such fund **85** the zfm nolo provlaes, aftsr the oppmval Of thlr Act.:. -

r

r

6tataDowpartarit of .Uuootka - P3ga 4

ot.hera with raspaot to the pub110 ptiz2006 aought to bo Poo%qli%h%d by the groposcb 3.OgiElO~iCUl. In othbr worda th6re wat be a mbatentiel rmmsa for &d olasuification. It ~;~irt

## AOt be 6 EWE@

3r@lEralrp device **rwortad** to 

## r0r ahe purpQS% of &$Vla6she lo, In 

## saot, a locall&u Elmtqppsermnoe of Et &tsaOXaf.

law." Dobe ah0Act in p*&tZculE&so ah0 teat laib **dovm. in**  **the Nller**  **v, PZ**  **Rat35 G45s?**  (000 ale0 Uemr **county v.**  **TyJmA,**

**97 8.**  **EfBi**

**(2) 467,**  **I.28 Tea**  **223).**



## xt ta ourOQtibu%

a&c theAcbin trevoneu Artfola **3,** SsoE&A **56** of th4 **6Pt3*** 

## guott. oacon- **@AS% f** **tUtion 83~14**  **ia** thoroioro, **m&L**
#### In the Matter of Travelers Indemnity Company, Respondent, v Safie Mohammed et al., Respondents, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

[788 NYS2d 615]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated December 29, 2003, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new hearing before a different justice on the issues raised in the petition.

The cumulative effect of the Supreme Court’s conduct at the hearing upon the petition to permanently stay an uninsured motorist arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) was to . deprive the appellants, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and Annarie C. Sidney, of a fair hearing *(see Ougourlian v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*5 AD3d 644 [2004]; *Habenicht v R.K.O. Theatres,*23 AD2d 378 [1965]). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new hearing before a different justice. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000592 28-DEC-2018 07:48 AM
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATON OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, the (“Report”),I, Catherine M. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/Catherine M. Davidson


Catherine M. Davidson


Principal Financial Officer








May 16, 2011




















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                        EMPIRE FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Empire
Financial Holding Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Richard L. Goble, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard L. Goble
Richard L. Goble
Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 17, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Batty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2005                
|                                  
|/s/ JOHN BATTY                    
|John Batty Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at September 30, 1997, and its statement of
income for the nine months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,434,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      26,811,017
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,211,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,081,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,003,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,081,362
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,978,291
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,752,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,752,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,752,076
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet, therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
SHAREHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT AND PROXY

Reference  is made to  Agreement  and Plan of Merger  dated  August 7, 2000 (the
"Merger  Agreement") by and among Ebiz Enterprises,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
("Ebiz"),  LinuxMall.com,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation ("LMI"), and Linux Mall
Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which Ebiz
will acquire all of the outstanding capital stock and equity interests of LMI by
means of a merger (the "Merger") of LMI and Merger Sub.

In  consideration  of Ebiz  and LMI  entering  into  the  Merger  Agreement  and
consummating  the Merger,  and for other good and  valuable  consideration,  the
receipt of which is hereby  acknowledged,  the  undersigned,  for the benefit of
Ebiz and LMI, hereby confirms, covenants and agrees that with regard to the next
election of  Directors of Ebiz  following  the  consummation  of the Merger (the
"Election"),  the undersigned shall vote all Ebiz shares conferring the right to
vote held by the  undersigned  (the  "Shares")  in favor of such  persons as are
nominated  by the Board of  Directors  of Ebiz  pursuant  to Section  2.2 of the
Merger Agreement.

For the  purpose of voting  the Shares  with  respect to the  matters  described
herein,  the  undersigned  hereby  appoints,  effective as of the closing of the
Merger,  Jeffrey Rassas,  Stephen Herman,  David Shaw, and Ray Goshorn,  each as
proxy to vote all Shares  registered in the name of the undersigned at a meeting
of  shareholders  or by  written  consent,  with  all  power  possessed  by  the
undersigned,  including full power of substitution  thereof, for a period of two
years,  to be  irrevocable  during such  period.  This proxy is coupled  with an
interest.  The  certificate  evidencing  Shares  registered  in the  name of the
undersigned  shall  bear a legend  that the Shares  are  subject to this  voting
agreement  and proxy.  This voting  agreement  and proxy shall be binding on the
undersigned's successors and assigns.

                     [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Shareholder Voting Agreement
and Proxy to be executed and delivered as of the date indicated below.



Dated October 5, 2000                  [SHAREHOLDER]

                                        /s/ Jeffrey I. Rassas
                                        ----------------------------------------

                                        Name: Jeffrey I. Rassas
                                              ----------------------------------
Exhibit 32

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of MainStreet BankShares, Inc., certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 USC, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications
contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|               |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: 03/23/09 |  |  |  | /s/ Larry A. Heaton                  
|               |  |  |  | Larry A. Heaton                      
|               |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|               |  | 
|Date: 03/23/09 |  |  |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith                  
|               |  |  |  | Brenda H. Smith                      
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President             
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|               |  |  |  | Corporate Secretary                  



59
EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationTMNG.COM, Inc.
    
    DelawareTMNG Europe Ltd.
    
    England and WalesTMNG Canada Ltd.
    
    CanadaTMNG Marketing, LLC
    
    KansasTMNG Technologies, Inc.
    
    DelawareCambridge Strategic Management Group,
Inc., (formerly TMNG Strategy, Inc.)
    
    DelawareCambridge Adventis Ltd.
    
    England and WalesRVA Consulting, LLC
    
    New JerseyTWG Consulting, Inc.
    
    KansasCartesian Ltd.
    
    England and Wales
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129665 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan FRANCIS TULL, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129665 COA: 252683 Genesee CC: 02-072773 WTF, INC., d/b/a J.J. SHAKERS, Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, and

RICKY JOE ROLLAND, Defendant, Cross-Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
#### CAROLYN E. CICALESE v. NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

John H. Glenn Research Center
Lewis Field

Cleveland, OH 44135-3191

February 11, 2011

Occu-Health, Inc.
Attn: Pat McCullough
2090 Carpenter Pike
Versailles, KY 40383

Subject: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request No. 11-GRC-F-00472

This letter is to advise you that a releasability determination regarding your FOIA request for a
copy of contract NNC06CB70C including the modifications have been made. This determination
has taken into consideration the relevant statutes, case law, and guidance, as well as comments
received from the Contracting Officer and the submitter. Accordingly, it is my decision to deny
your request in part. The basis for this denial is set forth below.

A previous releasability determination dated September 11, 2009 has been made on contract
NNCO06CB70C and modifications #1-24. These documents will be released in accordance with
that determination. Modifications #25-28 and 30-36 will be released in full. Modification #29
will be released in part. The pricing box listed on the last page of the statement of work will be
withheld under exemption 4 of the FOIA 5 U.S.C § 552 (b). This exemption protects trade
secrets, commercial, proprietary or financial information,

There is no charge for processing this Tequest since the applicable fees do not meet the established
threshold.

You may appeal this initial determination to the NASA Administrator. Your appeal must (1) be
addressed to the Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA),
Mail Stop: FOIA, Room 9R17, 300 E. Street SW, Washington, DC 20546; (2) be clearly
identified on the envelope and in the letter as an “Appeal under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA)”; (3) include a copy of the request for the Agency record and a copy of this initial
determination; (4) to the extent possible, state the reasons why you believe this decision should be
reversed; and (5) be sent to the Administrator within 30 calendar days of the date of the receipt of
this initial determination.

If you have any questions, Please contact the FOIA Officer, Angela Pierce at (216) 433-2813.

2K ee

ion Lugo
irector
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

STEVEN L. CALHOUN, JR., 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAN SCHNURR, 

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 14-3267

(D.C. No. 5:14-CV-03017-SAC)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 18, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3267 Document: 01019386874 Date Filed: 02/18/2015 Page: 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Paul F. McLaughlin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Rudolph Technologies, Inc.








Date: June 24, 2011








By:/s/  PAUL F. MCLAUGHLINPaul F. McLaughlinChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00406-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF X.L.C., A CHILD

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01100

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a final order terminating appellant’s parental rights 

which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was 

filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The appellant’s brief was due on December 13, 2021. 

However, the appellant has filed her second motion requesting an extension of time to file the 

appellant’s brief. The motion is GRANTED. The appellant’s brief is due on or before January 4, 

2022.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, no further 

requests for extensions of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Gerard Valmore BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-6939.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Gerard Valmore Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Gerard Valmore Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by of the district court. *See Brown v. DeWalt,*No. CA-03-371-H-5 (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2001 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2001

  To authorize an additional permanent judgeship for the district of 
                    Hawaii, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2003

 Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Akaka) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize an additional permanent judgeship for the district of 
                    Hawaii, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII.

    (a) Additional Permanent District Judgeship.--The President shall 
appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional 
district judge for the district of Hawaii.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table under section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Hawaii and inserting the following:

    ``Hawaii................................................      4.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dudley *v.*Fisher.—In error.

*Monday, December 8.*

A DEFENDANT, by appearing to a suit in a justice’s Court and pleading in bar, waives all objections to the form of the process. *Rittenour*v. *M‘Causland,*5 Blackf. 540. *Wibright*v. *Wise, 4*Blackf. 137, and note.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELIZABETH BAIN.

December 22, 1986.

Petition for certification denied. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*548)
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000547 28-MAR-2018 08:03 AM