alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1775

JOHN DAVID HENDRICKSON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JANELLE DAWN WALKER, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John David Hendrickson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

John David Hendrickson appeals the district court’s 

orders dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) (2006) for being frivolous 

and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted, 

and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrickson v. 

Walker, No. 1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 10, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Biography

Image Credit: NASA / Bill Ingalls

John Cavolowsky is responsible for the overall planning, management, and evaluation of 

ARMD’s efforts to cultivate revolutionary concepts, tools, and technologies that enable 

aviation transformation. TACP solicits and encourages ideas, creates the environment for 

researchers to experiment with those ideas, explores broadly-critical technologies, develops 

new computational and experimental tools, performs ground and small-scale flight tests, 

allows failures and learning from them, and drives turnover into future concepts and firstof-a-kind capabilities.

He also supports the ARMD associate administrator in a broad range of mission directorate 

activities, including strategic planning and external coordination.

Previously, Cavolowsky was director of the Airspace Operations and Safety Program, where 

he led overall planning, management, and evaluation of ARMD’s efforts in foundational 

air traffic management and operational safety research that enables development of 

revolutionary improvements to, and modernization of, the National Airspace System.

Prior positions include director of the former Aviation Systems Program, deputy program 

director and associate program manager for the Airspace Systems Program, and project 

manager for the Human Measures and Performance Project.

Cavolowsky began his NASA career in 1989 at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California 

as a technical lead and research manager for aerothermodynamics, addressing research and 

development challenges in hypersonic propulsion and thermal protection systems. He also 

served as a technical manager for aerospace programs in the Office of the Center Director at 

NASA Ames and has published more than 25 technical papers.

Cavolowsky has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts 

Institute of Technology, and a Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical 

Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.

Dr. John A. Cavolowsky

Director, Transformative Aeronautics Concepts Program (TACP)

NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD)
LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER, INC.

NASA Nights at Liberty Science Center

Michael Shanahan

7/1/22 - 6/30/23

Liberty Science Center NASA NIGHT sign 

Credits: Liberty Science Center

Two free NASA Nights, aimed at students and families 

from underserved school districts will feature coding 

workshops in which students navigate a virtual rover, 

hands-on activities on rockets, air flight and space 

flight, and educational programming on climate change, 

the Artemis Mission and the James Webb Space 

Telescope. This content will be presented in highly 

engaging and interactive Planetarium experiences, 

Science on a Sphere, and hands-on workshops. The 

planetarium presentations, each featuring a NASA 

Goddard expert, will be presented twice at each event, 

with simultaneous Spanish translation. Other 

planetariums with the same software will be able to 

view the content live; presentations will also be 

streamed to YouTube 360 and Facebook Live. The new 

original planetarium programming on Artemis and the 

JWST will later be offered as school programming for 

grades 4-8, both at the planetarium and remotely.

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0438, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of Empire
Financial Holding Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report and based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or
         is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

 Date: April 6, 2005

 /s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
 ---------------------------
 Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
 Principal Executive Officer
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Read the facts about astronaut Jeanette Epps and find the underlined words in the word search.

ASTRONAUT JEANETTE EPPS

Jeanette Epps is from New York. 

She is an inventor and received patents

for her ideas to make cars safer.

Jeanette likes to travel to new places, 

read, run and scuba dive. She also likes to 

be a mentor and to spend time with family.

She was selected as an astronaut in 2009. 

She has been on an underwater mission. 

She spent nine days living and working on 

the ocean floor. 

She is part of the Crew-8 mission to the 

International Space Station. Crew-8 is 

flying in a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft.

Learn more about 

Jeanette Epps 

at https://go.nasa.

gov/497ZGqq
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Bailey, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rondell Perkins, Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 110]

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J), rendered May 16, 2002, convicting defendants, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing each of them, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendants’ application pursuant to *Batson v Kentucky*(476 US 79 [1986]). The record establishes that the court completed the third step of the *Batson*protocols, and supports its finding that the specifically articulated, nondiscriminatory reasons provided by the prosecutor for the challenge in question were not pretextual. Defendants’ challenge to the sufficiency of the court’s finding is unpreserved and *363unavailing. Viewed in context, the court’s express finding that the panelist was “spaced out” clearly constituted the court’s acceptance, based on its own observations of the juror’s behavior, of the prosecutor’s demeanor-based explanation for the peremptory challenge. This finding is entitled to great deference *(see People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350 [1990], *affd*500 US 352 [1991]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence that, one to two weeks before the incident, defendant Perkins was in possession of a revolver of similar appearance to the weapon used in the charged crimes. This evidence was relevant to show that Perkins had access to such a weapon, thus tending to establish his involvement in the charged crimes *(People v Del Vermo,*192 NY 470, 478-482 [1908]; *People v Marte,*7 AD3d 405, 407 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 677 [2004]), and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect. Contrary to Perkins’s argument, we conclude that, when viewed as a whole, the court’s ruling on the People’s *Molineux*application encompassed this theory of admissibility.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Particulars
    
    
    
    Ownership interestSignificant subsidiaries
    
    Country of incorporation
    
    2011(%)
    
    
    2010(%)
    
    
    2009(%)Sify Software Limited
    
    India
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    100Sify International Inc
    
    US
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    100Sify Technologies
(Singapore) Pte Limited
    
    Singapore
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2196 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that per diem payments 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs for the care of veterans in 

State homes shall not be used to offset payments that are made under 

the medicaid program for the purpose of assisting veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that per 

diem payments by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

for the care of veterans in State homes shall not be 

used to offset payments that are made under the medicaid program for the purpose of assisting veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•S 2196 IS 

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT UNDER MEDICAID PROGRAM OF 

2 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PER 

3 DIEM PAYMENTS TO STATE HOMES FOR VET4 ERANS. 

5 Section 1741 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(e) Payments to States pursuant to this section shall 

9 not be considered a liability of a third party for any pur10 pose under section 1902(a)(25) of the Social Security Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 1396a(25)).’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99-2


                  CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of A Novo Broadband, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
J. Easterday, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.


August 14, 2002                             /s/ Steven J. Easterday
                                            -----------------------
                                            Steven J. Easterday
                                            Principal Financial Officer
61 

~ • ........-

't"l. 

--

* 

* * 

0 

'. ' .. 

• .. '. . , . (, 

' • I ·I ~ • I ' /' 

\ :( 

;> \ . 

~r-A, 

* 

- -· - ---- . ~-. . . . 

., .•. . . . . . - ·1 • •• 

.-,,,,:'
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE

FINAL REPORT1

Revision of Comment to Pa.R.E. 902

On June 12, 2017, effective November 1, 2017, upon recommendation of the 

Committee on Rules of Evidence, the Court ordered the revision of the Comment to 

Pa.R.E. 902. The purpose of this revision is to alert readers that certain selfauthenticating records may also require proof of identification. Under the Rules of 

Evidence, certificates evidencing a prior criminal record are self-authenticating under 

Pa.R.E. 902(4). See also 42 Pa.C.S. § 5328, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6103, and 75 Pa.C.S. § 

6501. However, self-authenticating certificates fulfill only part of the requirement for 

proving a prior criminal conviction. Under case law, the proponent has the burden of 

proving: 1) a prior conviction is authentic (i.e., with a self-authenticating certificate); and 

2) the person against whom it is sought to be admitted is the same person reflected on 

the certificate. Commonwealth v. Boyd, 344 A.2d 864 (Pa. 1975). 

 

1

The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee 

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the 

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of
Quovadx, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Quovadx, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2004: 1) No. 333-30356
2) No. 333-67436
3) No. 333-113781
    
    4) No. 333-88408
5) No. 333-104184
    
    6) No. 333-67650
7) No. 333-110388
 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Denver, Colorado
March 9, 2005
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
 AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
 ACTION: Notice of board membership.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Performance Review Board (PRB) members, to include the Joint Staff, the U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Defense Field Activities, the U.S Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and the following Defense Agencies: Defense Advance Research Projects Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, Defense Commissary Agency, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Defense Business Transformation Agency, Defense Legal Services Agency, and Pentagon Force Protection Agency. The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB shall provide fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service and Senior Professional performance appraisals and make recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Deputy Secretary of Defense.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         September 21, 2010.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Watson, Assistant Director for Executive and Political Personnel, Washington Headquarters Services, Office of the Secretary of Defense, (703) 693-8373.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following executives are appointed to the Office of the Secretary of Defense PRB with specific PRB panel assignments being made from this group. Executives listed will serve a one-year renewable term, effective September 21, 2010. Office of the Secretary of Defense Chairperson Christine Condon
PRB panel membersJohn Pennett
Joseph AngelloRonald Pontius
Leigh BradleySusan Yarwood
David FisherJoseph Bonnet III
Dennis SavageRichard Sayre
Louis CabreraAllen Middleton
Charles GunnelsJonathan Cofer
John SheaElaine Simmons
Steven AustinTimothy Harp
Richard GinmanPaul Koffsky
Michael KnollmannRobert Salesses
James McMichaelLydia Moschkin
Linda OliverThomas Milks
Matice WrightAlan Shaffer
Mark EastonCraig Glassner
Richard GenaillePaul Kozemchak
Dan HaendelTimothy Morgan
James RobertsJames Russell
John James Jr.Matthew Schaffer
Maureen Viall
 Dated: October 26, 2010. Morgan F. Park, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.


[FR Doc. 2010-27716 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Steve Valenzuela, Chief Financial Officer of Rainmaker Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | /s/                Alexander L. Weis   |   |
|   |   |   | Alexander                L. Weis       |   |
|   |   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   |                                   |   |
|   |   |   | October                22, 2007        |   |

----
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 10.50


                       GREEMENT BETWEEN JAMES L. SLATTERY

         In December 1999, at Mr. Slattery's request in anticipation of his
desire to retire in August 2000, Mr. Slattery's schedule was reduced to no more
than twenty-five (25) hours per week with a commensurate reduction in, his
compensation.
#### In the Matter of County of Nassau, Respondent, v Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 63]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an employee disciplinary dispute, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered November 25, 2003, which granted the petition and denied the cross petition to compel arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“Generally, under New York statutory and case law, a court may address three threshold questions on a motion to compel or to stay arbitration: (1) whether the parties made a valid agreement to arbitrate; (2) if so, whether the agreement has been complied with; and (3) whether the claim sought to be arbitrated would be time-barred if it were asserted in State court *(see,*CPLR 7502 [b]; 7503; *Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.],*51 NY2d 1, 9, n 2)” *(Matter of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v Luckie,*85 NY2d 193, 201-202 [1995], *cert denied sub nom. Manhard v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,*516 US 811 [1995]).

“Clearly, under New York law, *statutory*time limitation questions ... as opposed to *contractual*time limitations agreed upon by the parties . . . are for the courts, not the arbitrators” *(Matter of Smith Barney Shearson v Sacharow,*91 NY2d 39, 48 [1997] [emphasis added], quoting *Matter of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v Luckie, supra*at 202; *see Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], supra*at 8-9). Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the May 28, 2003, demand to arbitrate the July 10, 1996, termination of Mimóse Zephirin’s employment was time-barred by statute *(see*CPLR 7502 [b]; *Matter of County of Nassau v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn.,*265 AD2d 326 [1999]). Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.