alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 

 January 11, 2024 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the SenateConfirmed Latino Biden-Harris Appointees and Nominees Reception on 

January 11, 2024 

On January 11, 2024, Equis Institute, Unidos US, and Latino Victory Foundation being 

designated as a not-for-profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 

Service Code, will jointly hold a reception at the China Chicano a Jose Andres Restaurant, 

Washington, DC, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Equis Institute, Undos US, and Latino 

Victory Foundation will share in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing invitations 

for this event. 

Approximately 145 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of 

the legislative branch, state and local government officials, representatives from academia, 

industry, and foreign entities. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and 

beverages, is approximately $90 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA 

attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event 

meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees who do 

not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the five sponsors may accept 

an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that 

the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsors, such as procurement duties, program management, or 
2

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
Order entered March 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00124-CV

ALPHA OMEGA CHL, INC., Appellant

V.

BRIAN P. MIN AND MIN LAW FIRM, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07799

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. 

This Court issued its opinion on the merits in this appeal on June 16, 2016. By order 

dated October 4, 2016, the Court abated this appeal due to the suggestion of bankruptcy filed by 

appellee Brian P. Min. The bankruptcy court has discharged Mr. Min’s bankruptcy case. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate forthwith.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      13.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Radware Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roy Zisapel, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      June 5, 2007




/s/
                Roy
                Zisapel
              Roy
                Zisapel
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
#### John E. Woodward *v.*Isaac Kohn.

Steamboat — Pleading — Demurrer.

• Tbe appellant admits that he was part owner of the steamer, and does not deny, as is charged in the bill, that D. P. Woodward was clerk or master of the boat, with full authority to purchase supplies and bind the boat and owners. *Held,*that, in order to make the answer sufficient, these denials were necessary.

APPEAL PROM MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 8, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters :

This was an action against appellant as part owner of the steamer K. L. Woodward on a due bill, executed for supplies furnished said boat by appellee.

Appellant attempted to defend the action by answering; but a demurrer having been sustained to his answer and failing to an*100-swer further, judgment was rendered against him from which he has appealed.

Whether the answer presented a sufficient *defense*is the only questiou for determination.

It may be true that appellant did not sign the due bill himself, nor authorize B. P. Woodward to sign this particular one, and he may not have formally ratified it after it was signed by B. P. Woodward as he states. But he admits he .was part owner of said steamer, and does not deny that B. P. Woodward, who executed said due bill, was the clerk or master of the boat with full authority to purchase supplies, and bind the boat and owners thereof for the same. And in order to make the answer sufficient these •denials were necessary. And as a plea of no consideration the answer was insufficient. The demurrer was, therefore, properly sustained.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RENE BRABANT.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
NATIONAL SPACE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

Mobile Earth + Space Observatory Science 

Experiences For Engaging Rural Students

Ana Bucki Lopez

6/01/23 - 5/31/24

MESO will work closely with teachers in a rural, 

southwestern Colorado community, via a curriculum codesign process, to create a curriculum of interactive 

science and engineering activities, using the OSIRISRex mission as a framework. The resulting curriculum 

will be co-delivered in-class by the teachers and MESO 

scientist-educators over the course of two weeks when 

the Mobile Earth + Space Observatory visits the 

community’s four K-12 schools. Prior to the visit, a 

series of telecons and Q&A sessions with scientists and 

engineers from the OSIRIS-REx team will get the 

students excited. Two community stargazing parties will 

also be held, as well as a concluding Community 

Science Festival to highlight the work done by the 

students.

List of Partners:

• Ignacio School District

• Southern Ute Indian Montessori Academy

Inside MESO

Credits: Mobile Earth & Space Observatory

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC23K0799, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
Exhibit 32



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant
to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harris & Harris Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Douglas W. Jamison, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Patricia N. Egan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his/her knowledge:



(1)     The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ Douglas W. Jamison            | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Douglas W. Jamison         | 
|Title:    Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:    August 10, 2015          | 



|/s/ Patricia N. Egan              | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Patricia N. Egan           | 
|Title:    Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date:    August 10, 2015          | 



2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,360,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,142,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,885,239
<PP&E>                                       1,001,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 492,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,223,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,954,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,474
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,266,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,223,361
<SALES>                                      1,313,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,313,171
<CGS>                                        1,357,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,601,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (287,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (287,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Malden, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Nicholas MaldenNicholas Malden Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary May 4, 2004
#### Elizabeth Freulich-Woodruff, Appellant, v B.A. Auto Repair, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 886]

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated January 30, 2004, as denied her motion for leave to enter judgment upon the defendants’ default in answering, and, upon the denial of the cross motion of the defendant Z & B Auto Repair, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, granted the defendants 30 days to interpose an answer.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiff is entitled to enter judgment against the defendant B.A. Auto Repair, Inc., which failed to answer the complaint and submitted no opposition to the motion for leave to enter a default judgment. The plaintiff is also entitled to enter judgment against the defendant Z & B Auto Repair, Inc. (hereinafter Z & B Auto). To successfully oppose the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter judgment based upon its failure to interpose an answer, Z & B Auto was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default, and a meritorious defense *(see Dinstber v Fludd,*2 AD3d 670, 671 [2003]; *Siu Lung Cheng v Leader Jewelry Corp.,*246 AD2d 526 [1998]; *Albano v Nus Holding Corp.,*233 AD2d 280, 281 [1996]). Z & B Auto failed to present a reasonable excuse for its default. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

December 8, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Maryland 

Space Business Roundtable (MSBR) Lunch on December 12, 2023

On December 12, 2023, the Maryland Space Business Roundtable (MSBR), a nonprofit 

organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a lunch at the Martin’s 

Crosswinds in Greenbelt, MD, starting at 11:30 a.m. The guest speaker is Dr. James Garvin,

Chief Scientist of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

Approximately 150 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, 

academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $40 per person. MSBR is in control of the organizing, planning and 

invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the MSBR, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or 

administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local 

ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman F. Swanton, Chairman ofthe Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Norman F. Swanton         |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Norman F. Swanton             |
| ***Chairman  of the Board***  |
| *And Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                      |
| November 2, 2007              |

 

1

----
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 23, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY C. KENNEY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NICS APPEAL DIVISION FBI

INFORMATION SERVICES, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-5031

(D.C. No. 4:07-CV-00351-TCK-PJC)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER

Before HARTZ, O’BRIEN, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

On December 18, 2009, district court entered minute orders denying Plaintiff

Anthony Kenney’s motion to reopen and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeals. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Plaintiff’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

The time limit for filing a notice of appeal in a civil case is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The sixty-day deadline under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) for filing a timely notice of appeal in this civil case expired on

February 16, 2010. Plaintiff’s notice of appeal was filed on March 9, 2010, which was

twenty-one days past the sixty-day filing deadline. Plaintiff did not move in the district court

Appellate Case: 10-5031 Document: 01018389858 Date Filed: 03/23/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

for an extension of time. Pro se appellants must comply with the requirements of the

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that govern all litigants. See Ogden v. San Juan

County, 32 F.3d 452, 455 (10th Cir. 1994). 

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-5031 Document: 01018389858 Date Filed: 03/23/2010 Page: 2
EXHIBIT 7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cryptologic Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lewis N. Rose, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    March 29, 2007



/s/LEWIS N. ROSE

Lewis N. Rose

President and Chief Executive Officer









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cryptologic Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Taylor, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    March 29, 2007



/s/STEPHEN B. TAYLOR

Stephen B. Taylor

Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A-5for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ JOHN C. GARRISON                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | John C. Garrison                             |
|   | *Principal Financial and Accounting Officer* |

 
| July 7, 2005 |   |
|-------------------|--------|

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ICOP Digital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----