alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8914]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Warriors and Mothers: Epic Mbembe Art,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about December 9, 2014, until on or about September 7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: October 3, 2014. 

Kelly Keiderling,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-24138 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2267

AN ACT

To amend section 29(k) of the Small Business Act to

establish funding priorities for women’s business centers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Sustain5 ability Recovery Act of 2004’’.
 †

2

S 2267 ES

1 SEC. 2. WOMEN’S BUSINESS CENTERS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 29(k) of the Small Busi3 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 656(k)) is amended—

4 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(C) FUNDING PRIORITY.—Subject to

7 available funds, and reservation of funds, the

8 Administration shall, for fiscal year 2004,

9 allocate—

10 ‘‘(i) $150,000 for each eligible wom11 en’s business center established under sub12 section (b), except for centers that request

13 a lesser amount;

14 ‘‘(ii) from the funds reserved under

15 paragraph (4)(A), not more than $125,000

16 to each eligible women’s business center es17 tablished under subsection (l); and

18 ‘‘(iii) any funds remaining after allo19 cations are made under clauses (i) and (ii)

20 to new eligible women’s business centers

21 and eligible women’s business centers that

22 did not receive funding in the prior fiscal

23 year under subsection (b).’’; and

24 (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by adding at the end

25 the following:
†

3

S 2267 ES

1 ‘‘(v) For fiscal year 2004, 48 per2 cent.’’.

3 (b) SUNSET DATE.—The amendments made by sub4 section (a) are repealed on October 1, 2004.

Passed the Senate April 29, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2267

AN ACT

To amend section 29(k) of the Small Business Act

to establish funding priorities for women’s business centers.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MIGUEL MIQUELE.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 12.1
 
       a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such
internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 12, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Raju VegesnaName:
    Raju VegesnaTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Fn 

c 

3 

Michael I. Mott 

Chief Engineer 

Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Information Officer 

i 

I 

I 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Inspector General 

Roberta L Gross 

Advisory Panel 

Chief Financial --- Officer Counsel 

Arnold Holz Edward A Frankle George E. Reese (Acting) 

I I 

I H P 2 

Policy and Procurement Public Affairs I 

Deidre A. Lee Laurie Boeder Alan M. Ladwig 

I 1 

Utilization Technology I I I 

Ralph C. Thomas John E. Mansfield 

Mission to Planet Space 

William F. Townsend Wil Trafton 

I IAciina) 

Human Resources I RE,1Het;:L 1 1 1 1 andEducation 1 

John D Schurnache: Jeff Lawrence Spence M. Armstrong 

Systems and Operatlons --- Facilities Assurance 

Benita A. Cooper Frederick Gregory Michael D. Chrislensen 

Microgravity Communications Sciences and 

Applications 

Acting) 

Aeronautics 

Space Center 

I 

Robed Whitehead Wes T. Huntress 

IL I I " I 

Joseph Rothenberg I 1 Georce W.S. Ab& 

John F. Kennedy 

Georgo C. Marshall 

Space Flight Center I1 - I 

John C. Stennir 

Space Center 

Edward Slow 

Center 

Research Center 

Kemeth J. Szalal 

as of June 1996 

'JPL is a contractor-operated facilily. Roy S. Estess
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2260

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 

in the calculation of medicare disproportionate share hospital payments 

for hospitals in Puerto Rico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2004

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for fairness in the calculation of medicare disproportionate share hospital payments for hospitals in Puerto 

Rico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare DSH Pay5 ments for Puerto Rico Hospitals Fairness Act of 2004’’. 
2

•S 2260 IS 

1 SEC. 2. CALCULATION OF MEDICARE DSH PAYMENTS FOR 

2 PPS HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO. 

3 Section 1886(d)(9)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(9)(D)(iii)) is amended to read as 

5 follows: 

6 ‘‘(iii) Subparagraph (F) (relating to dispropor7 tionate share payments), except that for this pur8 pose—

9 ‘‘(I) the sum described in clause (ii) of this 

10 subparagraph shall be substituted for the sum 

11 referred to in paragraph (5)(F)(ii)(I); and 

12 ‘‘(II) for discharges occurring on or after 

13 October 1, 2004, subclause (I) of paragraph 

14 (5)(F)(vi) shall be applied by substituting for 

15 the numerator described in such subclause the 

16 number of a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hos17 pital’s patient days for a cost reporting period 

18 that are made up of patients who (for such 

19 days) were entitled to benefits under part A of 

20 this title and were recipients of aid under the 

21 State plan approved under title XVI that pro22 vides for grants to States for aid to the aged, 

23 blind, or disabled.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2362 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2362

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2004

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
     instrumentation support control building and associated site 
       development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY INSTRUMENTATION 
              SUPPORT FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to develop the site for a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
instrumentation support control building, including the installation of 
necessary utilities and equipment housings, and to construct such 
building on the site, for the purpose of supporting the collaborative 
Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) 
project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.

            Passed the Senate June 14, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Coleman J. Clougherty,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Coleman J. Clougherty


Coleman J. Clougherty
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
#### ROC INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. PINELANDS COMMISSION.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners  1992-C,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         214,822
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               502,771
<PP&E>                                         7,052,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,575,004)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,980,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,769
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,971,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,980,743
<SALES>                                        91,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               94,472
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  64,914<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                768
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            768
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes gene al and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JESUS GARCIA.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY BATTLE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

LOUIS BULLOCK; PATRICIA

BULLOCK; THOMAS SEYMOUR;

JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, individually

and in their official capacities, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-6048

 (D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00514-C) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-6048 Document: 01018414847 Date Filed: 05/04/2010 Page: 1
#### W. B. McCormick et al. *v.*G. W. Garth.

“ U. S.”— Meaning — “ The Government ”— Meaning.

It cannot be judicially known what the cabalistic letters “ U. S.” mean. There is no legal definite technical meaning attached to them, nor can it be determined that the words “ the Government ” means any other government than that of Kentucky.

Contracts — Sale of Whisky — Breach of United States Revenue Laws No bar to recovery —• Jurisdiction — 'United States Courts — Comity.

A mere breach of a revenue law of the United States cannot be pleaded in bar of a recovery on a contract valid under the laws of this State. If the United States Courts had jurisdiction of the cause they might declare the contract void.

APPEAL FROM TODD CIRCUIT COURT.

June 10, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The first paragraph of defendant’s answer alleges that he did not owe plaintiff, McCormick, anything for whisky *purchased from him;*the amended petition avers that he purchased the whisky from Prewit, who owned it and sold it to Garth to pay a debt due from Prewit to McCormick, and makes Prewit a coplaintiff; this paragraph of the answer was not responsive to the plaintiff’s pleadings as they then showed and presented no defense.

The second paragraph of the answer admits he purchased about thirty-two or thirty-three gallons of whisky of Prewit, but avers that neither McCormick nor Prewit had “ government license to sell whisky and that the sale was contrary to the statutes of the *U.*S., and hence the sale was void.”

We cannot know judicially what the cabalistic letters *“ U. S*means. Certainly there is no legal definite technical meaning attached to them; nor can we determine that the words *“*the government ” mean any other government than that of Kentucky.

If this answer was intended to plead in bar the acts of the Congress of the United States regulating the revenues of the government of the United States, it is radically defective and the demurrer should have been sustained for this reason.

*589Besides we apprehend the mere breach of a revenue law of the United States cannot be pleaded in bar of a recovery on a contract valid under the laws of the States. The United States has the undoubted right through its own courts to inflict punishment for the breach of its revenue laws, and perhaps when its courts have jurisdiction of causes they might declare the contract void, but the State courts are not hound to declare the contract void when valid by the State laws, either as a matter of law or comity.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial and further proceedings in accordance herewith.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. REGINALD VATTELLE, JR.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00558

- CV

In re Marsha Yarberry

L. R., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 17

- 0 132

- CPS C1, THE HONORABLE BR ANDY HALLFORD, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of L. R. The subject of this proceeding is court reporter Marsha Yarberry , who has failed to com ply with this Court’s order to file the reporter’s record.
On August 29, 2019 , we ordered Yarberry to file the record by September 5, 2019 , and cautioned her that failure to file the record by that date could require her to show cause why
she should not b e held in contempt of court. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Marsha Yarberry shall appear in person before
this Court on Wednesday, September 18, 2019 , at 10 :00 a
. m
. , in the Third Court of Appealscourtroom, located on the first floor of the Price D aniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions imposed for her failure to obey our August 29, 2019 order. This order to show cause
will be withdrawn , an d Y arberry will be relieved of her obligation to appear before this Court as
ordered above , if the Clerk of the Court receives the complete reporter’s record on or before September 16, 2019

. It is ordered on September 6, 2019

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Jus tices Triana and Smith
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the "Issuer") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James A. Yost, Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.




     /s/ James A. Yost
     ----------------------------------------
     James A. Yost
     Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
     September 16, 2002
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                       PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                                     -------------------------------------------------------- 
                                                                              Basic                             Diluted
                                                                     -----------------------              -------------------
                                                                   1997                  1996           1997               1996
                                                                   ----                  ----           ----               ----
<S>                                                              <C>               <C>                <C>                <C>    
Weighted average common stock
   outstanding during the period..................                6,260,570         6,248,718          6,260,570           6,248,718
Options...........................................                      0                 0              204,545             183,889
Effect upon weighted average of shares
  issued in acquisitions..........................                  242,977               0              242,977                 0
                                                                  ---------         ---------          ---------           ---------
Total.............................................                6,503,547         6,248,718          6,708,092           6,432,607
                                                                  =========         =========          =========           =========

Net income attributable to common and common 
  equivalent shares:
   Net Income.....................................               $2,121,642        $1,656,308         $2,121,642          $1,656,308
                                                                 ==========        ==========         ==========          ==========
Net income per common and common
  equivalent share................................               $     0.33        $     0.27         $     0.32          $     0.26
                                                                 ==========        ==========         ==========          ==========
</TABLE>
                                                                                
                                                                              17