alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Global Reach - NASA International Cooperation

Active Agreements with 

135 Countries and 2 

Multilateral Organizations

34

313

8

70

28

36

36

33

46

46
Artemis Accords – 23 Countries and Growing!

• Australia 

• Bahrain

• Brazil

• Canada

• Colombia

• France

• Israel

• Italy

• Japan 

• Republic of Korea

• Luxembourg

• Mexico

• New Zealand

• Nigeria

• Poland

• Romania

• Rwanda

• Saudi Arabia

• Singapore

• Ukraine

• United Arab Emirates

• United Kingdom

• United States
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Glynn Wilson, the Chief Executive Officer of TapImmune Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  TapImmune Inc.Date: April 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Glynn WilsonGlynn WilsonChairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Transition Period Report of East Delta Resources
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the nine months transition period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:


      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


                                                 /s/ Victor I.H. Sun
Date:  February 13, 2008.                        -------------------------------
       -----------------                         Victor I.H. Sun
                                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                                 Chief Operating Officer,
                                                 And Chief Financial Officer
#### Key Bank National Association, Respondent, v Harry L. Stern, Appellant, and Sara M. Stern et al., Defendants.

[789 NYS2d 297]

*657In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Harry L. Stern appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, (Nelson, J.), dated May 27, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion to amend the notice of pendency, judgment of foreclosure and sale, and all other documents in the action, nunc pro tunc, to correct the legal description of the foreclosed property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly disregarded the plaintiffs initial error in failing to serve upon the defendant all of the papers in support of its motion *(see*CPLR 2001). Once the plaintiff corrected the error by sending the omitted papers to the defendant, any prejudice due to the error was cured, as evidenced by the fact that the defendant was able to respond to the motion on the merits *(see Clark v State of New York,*302 AD2d 942 [2003]; *Volpe v Canfield,*237 AD2d 282 [1997]).

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to amend the notice of pendency, judgment of foreclosure and sale, and all other documents in the action, nunc pro tunc, to correct a minor typographical error in the legal description of the foreclosed property *(see Pacific Lime v Lowenberg Corp.,*77 AD2d 737 [1980]; *Kaufman v Levey,*142 Misc 243 [1931]; 1 Bergman, New York Mortgage Foreclosures § 15.02). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-4217NE

_____________ Marvin A. Watkins, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Woodmen of the World Life Insurance * [UNPUBLISHED] Society; Curtis L. Owen, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 20, 1997

Filed: May 30, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. MarvinA. Watkins appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary jud gment in Watkins's defamation action. We review a grant of summary judgmen t unde r a well-established standard. Because this is a diversity action, we review d e novo q uestions of state law. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court cor rectly applied the controlling state law and the record supports the district court's ruli ng. We also conclude a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value. We thus affirm on th e basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,861,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 73,690,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,339,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             237,654,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    116,003,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    87,862,653
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,954,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               237,654,714
<SALES>                                     46,928,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,491,456
<CGS>                                       11,096,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,088,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,971,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,380,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,743,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,636,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,636,913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20764

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE DOLORES OSORTO GONZALEZ, also known as Jose D. Osorto, also

known as Jose Delores Osorto, also known as Jose Dolores Osorto-Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-438-1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Dolores Osorto Gonzalez appeals the revocation of his supervised

release and resulting 12-month sentence. He now argues, for the first time, that

his revocation is invalid because the term of supervised release originally

imposed is invalid. Specifically, he contends that ordering deportable aliens

such as himself to serve a term of supervised release is unconstitutional. He

alternatively argues that the district court failed specifically to pronounce at

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 7, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20764 Document: 00512434096 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2013
No. 12-20764

resentencing the special condition of supervised release that he not again reenter

the United States illegally and that such failure to pronounce a special condition

orally renders the prior judgment of supervised release void.

Gonzalez may not now challenge the validity of his underlying sentence

of supervised release on appeal from the revocation of supervised release. See

United States v. Willis, 563 F.3d 168, 170 (5th Cir. 2009) (“It is by now wellestablished that a defendant may not use the appeal of a revocation of

supervised release to challenge an underlying conviction or original sentence.”);

United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 116 (5th Cir. 2005) (“Hinson may not . . .

use an appeal of the revocation of her supervised release to attack her original

sentence directly or collaterally in this proceeding.”). Consequently, the

arguments Gonzalez presents are to no avail. He has failed to show any error

in connection with his revocation proceedings, and the district court’s revocation

judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-20764 Document: 00512434096 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2013
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CRAIG DIXON.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE v. FAIR

No. 506A99

Case below: 354 N.C. 131

Motion by defendant for reconsideration and stay of the mandate denied 6 December 2001. Motion by Appellate Defender for withdrawal of opinion denied 6 December 2001. Motion by Appellate Defender for additional briefing as amicus curiae dismissed as moot 6 December 2001. Motion by N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers for leave fo file amicus curiae brief dismissed as moot 6 December 2001.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6252

GREGORY A. KISSINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE M. MCMILLAN, Sheriff,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-60-R)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Kissinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Kissinger v. McMillan, No. CA-98-60-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 12,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 9, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1058 Lower Tribunal No. 20-25636

________________ 

### Florida Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### 25 Plaza Corp., etc. , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge. Shepard, Smith, Kohlmyer & Hand, P.A., and Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III and Andrew J. Hand (Maitland), for appellant. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, and Jonathan R. Weiss and Amanda E. Preston, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Kamal Nath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Sify Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sify Technologies Limited.

Date: August 24, 2012



By:

/s/ Kamal NathName: Kamal NathTitle: Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Lorine S. Sweeney, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quovadx, Inc. (the“Registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual reportbased on such evaluation;  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: March 17, 2004                                                      /s/ Lorine S. Sweeney   Lorine S. Sweeney   President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

s0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

140030 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140030 

 COA: 293731 

Kalamazoo CC: 08-001221-FC 

AMBER MARIE McINTYRE-RODEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
OurPet’s Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of OurPet’s Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|/S/    SCOTT R. MENDES 
|-----------------------
|BY SCOTT R. MENDES     
|Chief Financial Officer



Dated: March 30, 2012



This certification is made solely for the
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other purpose.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OurPet’s Company and will be
retained by OurPet’s Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
balance  sheet of CNL Income  Fund XIII,  Ltd.  at  September  30,2000,  and its
statement  of income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its
entirety by  reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income FUnd XIII,  Ltd.  for the
nine months ended September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       742,421
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                120,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                 54,479
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       23,906,858
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,652,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               33,723,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                   32,669,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 33,723,034
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,601,333
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                593,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,188,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,188,638
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,188,638
<EPS-BASIC>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
<FN>
<F1> Due to the nature of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  XIII,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
asets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

of Chief Financial Officer



In
connection with the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T.
Hamilton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 22, 2005 |  |        |  |                        
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/ Robert T. Hamilton 
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Robert T. Hamilton     
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to eDiets.com, Inc. and will be retained by eDiets.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.