alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William E. Morgenstern, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rent-Way, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchanged Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: February 7, 2005                          /s/ William E. Morgenstern                             Signature     CHAIRMAN & CEO                          Title
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-37304, 333-74940,333-114979, 333-123948 and 333-137869 of The Management Network Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of ourreport dated May 14, 2007 relating to the financial statements of The Management Network Group,Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating toa restatement and the Company’s adoption of a new accounting standard) appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of The Management Network Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 30,2006.       /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael Cutler, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A of MIVA, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material aspects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: April 7, 2009/s/ MICHAEL CUTLER Chief Financial Officer, MIVA, Inc.


1

---



QuickLinks
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

February 27, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space Policy 

Institute, George Washington University Dinner on March 9, 2023 

On March 9, 2023, the Space Policy Institute (SPI), George Washington University (GWU), a 

nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a dinner at the 

DACOR Bacon House, 1801 F Street NW, Washington, DC, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The 

guest speaker is Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) on space oversight priorities of the House 

Committee on Space, Science, and Technology. 

Approximately 100 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, 

academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $103 per person. SPI is in control of the organizing, planning and 

invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the SPI/GWU, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their 

local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded 

to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
Flight Date Departure Location Destination Aircraft Type Purpose Comments

My Flight Log

My Flight Log

Flight Date Departure Location Destination Aircraft Type Purpose Comments


Travel Journal Page

Travel Journal Page

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters

300 E. St., SW

Washington, DC 20024

www.nasa.gov/aeronautics

www.nasa.gov

NP-2023-12-3205-HQ

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters

300 E. St., SW

Washington, DC 20024

www.nasa.gov/aeronautics

www.nasa.gov

NP-2023-12-3205-HQ
#### JEAN MAURI v. THE ROBBINS AGENCY.

May *2,*1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN JACKSON.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

2015

NASA Astronauts

www.nasa.gov NW-2015-09-016-JSC

Joseph M. Acaba Richard R. Arnold Serena M. Aunon Michael R. Barratt Robert L. Behnken Eric A. Boe Stephen G. Bowen Randolph J. Bresnik Daniel C. Burbank

Josh A. Cassada Christopher J. Cassidy Catherine Coleman Tracy C. Dyson Jeanette J. Epps Andrew J. Feustel E. Michael Fincke Jack D. Fischer Anna L. Fisher

Kevin A. Ford Patrick G. Forrester Michael E. Fossum Victor J. Glover Tyler N. Hague Michael S. Hopkins Douglas G. Hurley James M. Kelly Scott J. Kelly

Robert S. Kimbrough Christina Hammock Koch Timothy L. Kopra Kjell N. Lindgren Richard M. Linnehan Stanley G. Love Nicole Aunapu Mann Thomas H. Marshburn Richard A. Mastracchio

K. Megan McArthur Anne C. McClain Jessica U. Meir Andrew R. Morgan Lee M. Morin Karen L. Nyberg Donald R. Pettit Kathleen Rubins Scott D. Tingle

Mark T. Vande Hei Terry W. Virts, Jr. Shannon Walker Douglas H. Wheelock Peggy Whitson

 

Rex J. Walheim Jeffrey N. Williams Sunita L. Williams Barry E. Wilmore

Stephanie D. Wilson Gregory R. Wiseman
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SPORT-HALEY, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

*Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sport-Haley, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, theundersigned Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, do each certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:*

* *

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  February 22, 2005

 

 
| /s/  DONALD W. JEWELL                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald  W. Jewell                               |
| Interim  Chief Executive Officer                |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)*                |
|                                            |
|                                            |
| /s/  PATRICK W. HURLEY                          |   |
| Patrick  W. Hurley                              |
| Chief  Financial Officer                        |
| *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00289

- CV

ROBERTO TLALOLINI

v. REMAX ELITE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 20

- 4549

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 8, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0037

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DALE STEVEN MARTELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 15, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 9 2020

12/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0037
What you should know about NASA’s Quesst mission

W E W A N T T O

D R A S T I C A L L Y

R E D U C E

T R A V E L T I M E

But first, we need to change

the rules

The main goal of NASA’s Quesst

mission is to provide data to U.S.

and international regulators so they

may consider changing current

rules to enable quiet commercial

supersonic flight over land.

W E ’ R E B U I L D I N G

A N E W X - P L A N E

It’s not like any other

NASA and Lockheed Martin are

building NASA’s X-59 aircraft. It

will be 99.7 feet long with a

wingspan of 29.5 feet. The

design cruise speed of the

aircraft is Mach 1.4 or 925 miles

per hour at an altitude of

approximately 55,000 feet. 

T H E D E S I G N

O F T H E X - 5 9

I S U N I Q U E

It’s all about being quiet

The X-59 is an experimental

aircraft with a unique shape

and set of technologies that

reduce the loudness of a

sonic boom reaching the

ground to a gentle thump.

T H E X - 5 9 I S F O R

R E S E A R C H

P U R P O S E S O N L Y

It will never carry passengers

The X-59 is not a prototype

design for a commercial airliner.

Aircraft manufacturers may

choose to include technologies

developed for the X-59 in future

designs of commercial

supersonic aircraft.

T H E X - 5 9 M A Y

F L Y O V E R Y O U R

C O M M U N I T Y

Your role is crucial

NASA will fly the X-59 above

four to six U.S. communities

and ask residents to share

their response to the aircraft’s

sonic thump.

T H E F U T U R E O F

A V I A T I O N I S H E R E

Want to know more?

Follow nasa.gov/Quesst

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov NP-2019-05-032-LaRC
Exhibit 31.01



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro Stopping Centers Holdings, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2005                
|                                    
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

s0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140030

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140030 COA: 293731 Kalamazoo CC: 08-001221-FC AMBER MARIE McINTYRE-RODEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.






Date:    November 8, 2002                    /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
         --------------------                --------------------------
                                             Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 26, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY M. DAVIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

COLORADO ATTY. GEN. JOHN

SUTHERS; COLORADO

GOVERNOR BILL RITTER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1054

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02799-ZLW)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal

was filed out-of-time. 

Judgment was entered on January 14, 2010, and the notice of appeal was

filed more than 30 days later, on February 22.

In a civil case, in which the United States is not a party, a notice of appeal

must be filed within 30 days of entry of judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) (a

notice of appeal in a civil matter must be filed within 30 days of entry of

judgment unless the United States is a party); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (same).

Because a timely notice of appeal in a civil case is both mandatory and

Appellate Case: 10-1054 Document: 01018374743 Date Filed: 02/26/2010 Page: 1
-2-

jurisdictional, see Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209, 213 (2007), this appeal is

DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-1054 Document: 01018374743 Date Filed: 02/26/2010 Page: 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2267 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2267

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2004

              Referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 29(k) of the Small Business Act to establish funding 
                priorities for women's business centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Sustainability Recovery Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 29(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
656(k)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Funding priority.--Subject to available 
                funds, and reservation of funds, the Administration 
                shall, for fiscal year 2004, allocate--
                            ``(i) $150,000 for each eligible women's 
                        business center established under subsection 
                        (b), except for centers that request a lesser 
                        amount;
                            ``(ii) from the funds reserved under 
                        paragraph (4)(A), not more than $125,000 to 
                        each eligible women's business center 
                        established under subsection (l); and
                            ``(iii) any funds remaining after 
                        allocations are made under clauses (i) and (ii) 
                        to new eligible women's business centers and 
                        eligible women's business centers that did not 
                        receive funding in the prior fiscal year under 
                        subsection (b).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                            ``(v) For fiscal year 2004, 48 percent.''.
    (b) Sunset Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) are 
repealed on October 1, 2004.

            Passed the Senate April 29, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```