alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

s0901 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138520

ONEIDA CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff,

and

DAVID M. LEE, ROBERT E. LUDLUM, LAWRENCE J. EMERY, and JAMES BRANDT, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 138520 COA: 277093 Eaton CC: 05-001588-CZ CITY OF GRAND LEDGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

we REMAND this case to the Eaton Circuit Court for reinstatement of the March 15,

2007 order that dismissed the case with prejudice. MCL 123.14 1(2) exempts water departments that are not contractual customers of another water department and that serve less than 1% of the population of the state, such as the C ity of Grand Ledge, from the cost-based requirement of subsection (2). Cont rary to the Court of Appeals ruling, that

subsection does not indicate that the seco nd sentence of MCL 123.141(2) somehow modifies or limits application of the exempti on that appears in the subsequent sentence by defining “contractual customers” as wholesale contractual customers. Moreover, MCL 123.141(3) prohibits only “contractual customers as provided in subsection (2)” from charging retail rates in excess of the actu al cost of providing service. Grand Ledge is not a contractual customer as provided in subsection (2), so subsection (3) is not applicable.
LCRD

LASER COMMUNICATIONS RELAY DEMONSTRATION

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration
www.nasa.gov

Want to learn more about LCRD?

nasa.gov/lasercomms

twitter.com/NASALaserComm

NB-2021-4-657-GSFC

LCRD will showcase the unique 

capabilities of laser 

communications, which uses 

infrared light invisible to the 

human eye to transmit data. With 

lasers, NASA can receive more 

photos and videos from space 

than ever before! 

LCRD will reside 22,000 miles 

from Earth’s surface, testing the 

capabilities of laser 

communications and supporting 

missions like the International 

Space Station. 

LCRD will pave the way for future 

laser communications systems at 

the Moon and on Mars.

LCRD

LASER COMMUNICATIONS RELAY DEMONSTRATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRESH
CHOICE, INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 19, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-19-2000
<CASH>                                           2,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      128
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,943
<PP&E>                                          46,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,324)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,294
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,630
<SALES>                                         17,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,127
<CGS>                                            4,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    262
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       255
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          87,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,900
<PP&E>                                         847,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               (169,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,826,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,826,600
<SALES>                                        528,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               528,100
<CGS>                                          443,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1027
Exhibit 99.1

            Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
        Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Bruce Parsons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ebiz Enterprises,
Inc., certify that: (i) the Form 10-KSB, for the year ended June 30, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB, for
the year ended June 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial conditions and results of operations of Ebiz Enterprises, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Bruce Parsons
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bruce Parsons
                                            President & Chief Executive Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.2


AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


    THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (“AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into by and between Sharps Compliance Corp., having its principal office at 9220 Kirby Drive, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77054 (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and Diana P. Diaz the Company’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since June 9, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”).


WITNESSETH


    For and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Executive’s original executed employment agreement, between the Company and the Executive dated June 9, 2010 and amended on, (i) December 2, 2011 (effective November 17, 2011), (ii) March 6, 2012 (effective March 1, 2012) and (iii) September 10, 2015 and as revised by the Company’s Compensation Committee on February 7, 2020 (effective February 14, 2020), herein defined as the “Agreement”, as follows:


The Base Salary referred to in the Agreement (as amended) of $9,615.38 per pay period (twenty-six pay periods per year) is hereby changed to $10,576.92.


The Executive’s title referred to in the Agreement (as amended) is hereby changed to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (from Vice President and Chief Financial Officer).


    IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written below with the amended provisions noted above being effective April 8, 2021.


                        			
	EXECUTIVE:
	By: /s/ Diana P. Diaz

	Diana Diaz
	Date: April 8, 2021
	
	COMPANY:
	By: /s/ David P. Tusa

	David P. Tusa
	Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
	Date: April 8, 2021
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

I I I 

I GI I E 

I 

n ity Piograms 

I 

Amdd Hdz Edward A. Frankle George E. Reese 

I I I 

--- 

"naS S. Luedtke (Actiw) Peggy Wilhide Lori Gatver (Acting) 

Disadvantaged Buolners 

Utilization 

Ralph C. Thwnas 

Earth Science Space Flight 

I' I Roy S. ELr 

I I I I1 I LI 1 Fl 

Human Resources 

and Education 

Jdrn D. Schumcher Ed Helfaman Vicki A. Novak 

Assurance 

Jeffrey E. Sutton Frederick Gregory Michael D. Christensen 

Microgravity 

Sciences and 

Applications 

Amauld E. Nhgossian 

Space Science 

1 

Spence M. Armstrong 

I. 

asdNovsmber1999 

'JPL k a contraciot-operated facilii
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1


                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                                     -----------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Fifteentotwentyone.com Limited                                Republic of India
Indiaplaza.com, Inc.                                          California
IndiaWorld Communications Private Limited                     Republic of India
Safescrypt Limited                                            Republic of India
Satyam Education Services Limited                             Republic of India
Satyam Institute of E-Business Limited                        Republic of India
Satyam Webexchange Limited                                    Republic of India
Serwiz.com Limited                                            Republic of India
Sify Baron Net Devices Limited                                Republic of India
Sify PlasticsCommerce Limited                                 Republic of India
Ties2India.com Limited                                        Republic of India
</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00552-CR

Daniel Jason Spry, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 49683, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Daniel Jason Spry pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code

Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2004-05). The court deferred adjudication and placed him on community

supervision. Later, after appellant admitted the violations alleged in the State’s motion to adjudicate,

the court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to ten years in prison and a $500 fine. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
2

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: March 10, 2005

Do Not Publish
#### LOUIS LOWE v. CITY OF ORANGE.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 24.2**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director and/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as theundersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 26, 2009, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rulesthereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for himand on his behalf in connection therewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connectionwith the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights andpowers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power ofAttorney as of this 1st day of March 2010.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

          Executive Officers with whom the Company has entered into a
                          Change of Control Agreement



Samuel H. Maslak
Daniel R. Dugan*
Robert J. Gallagher
Edward P. Cornell
Rick E. Smith
Barry Zwarenstein
Charles H. Dearborn



* Mr. Dugan resigned from the Company effective March 1, 2000
#### Lewis, Administrator, *v.*Houston.

*Saturday, January*25, 1845.

Petition in the Probate Court against ah administrator for payment of a judgment against his intestate, alleging waste, &e. The petition was filed in 1842, and before the expiration of a year from the time of the defendant’s appointment as administrator. *Held,*that, without evidence of waste, the suit could not be sustained.

APPEAL from the *Fayette*Probate Court.

Blackford, J.

— This is a petition, in the nature of a bill in chancery, filed in July, 1842, in the Probate Court of *Fayette*county, by the appellee against the administrator of *Theodore R.*Lewis, deceased. The petition states that the plaintiff obtained judgment at the fall term of the *Fayette*Circuit Court, 1841, against the intestate for a certain sum of money, which remains unpaid; that the intestate died in the fall of 1841, subsequently to the judgment, leaving a large quantity of goods and chattels; that the defendant had obtained letters of administration on the estate, received said goods and chattels, and wasted them, &c. Prayer, that the defendant show cause why he should not pay the judgment, and why he should not be removed as administrator.

The defendant, in his answer to the petition, admits the existence of the judgment, but insists that it is void as having been obtained by fraud. He denies the alleged waste, and relies on the fact that the petition was filed before the expiration of a year from the time of his appointment as administrator. The cause was tried on its merits by the Court, and judgment rendered against the defendant for one half of the amount of the judgment described in the petition.

The suit being objected to on account of the time of its commencement, and the objection appearing on the face of the petition, the plaintiff was authorized to proceed only in *336consequence of the allegation of waste. R. S. 1838, pp. 182, 191. The record, which contains all the evidence given in the cause, does not show that there was any proof whatever of the waste charged in the petition; and the judgment for the plaintiff is consequently erroneous.

*G. B. Smith*and *J. S.*Newman, for the appellant.

*S. W.*ParJcer, for the appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Koji Sato, certify
that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Koji SatoKoji SatoChief Executive Officer, Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation




---

CERTIFICATIONS I, Yoichi Miyazaki, certify that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Yoichi MiyazakiYoichi MiyazakiChief Financial Officer, Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-91905)pertainig to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. of our report dated January
26,2000, with respect to the financial statements and schedules of Rainmaker
System, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, CA
March 29, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2181 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2181

To adjust the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2004

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To adjust the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rocky Mountain National Park 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Federal parcel.--The term ``Federal parcel'' means the 
        parcel of approximately 70 acres of Federal land near MacGregor 
        Ranch, Larimer County, Colorado, as depicted on the map.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map numbered 121/
        60,467, dated September 12, 2003.
            (3) Non-federal parcels.--The term ``non-Federal parcels'' 
        means the 3 parcels of non-Federal land comprising 
        approximately 5.9 acres that are located near MacGregor Ranch, 
        Larimer County, Colorado, as depicted on the map.
            (4) Park.--The term ``Park'' means Rocky Mountain National 
        Park in the State of Colorado.

SEC. 3. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) Exchange of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accept an offer to 
        convey all right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal 
        parcels to the United States in exchange for the Federal 
        parcel.
            (2) Conveyance.--Not later than 60 days after the date on 
        which the Secretary receives an offer under paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall convey the Federal parcel in exchange for the 
        non-Federal parcels.
            (3) Conservation easement.--As a condition of the exchange 
        of land under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall reserve a 
        perpetual easement to the Federal parcel for the purposes of 
        protecting, preserving, and enhancing the conservation values 
        of the Federal parcel.
    (b) Boundary Adjustment; Management of Land.--On acquisition of the 
non-Federal parcels under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall--
            (1) adjust the boundary of the Park to reflect the 
        acquisition of the non-Federal parcels; and
            (2) manage the non-Federal parcels as part of the Park, in 
        accordance with any laws (including regulations) applicable to 
        the Park.
                                 <all>
```