alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of Trimax Corporation., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), Derek Pepler, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company do hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/
      Derek Pepler         | 
|------ | ------------------------------ | 
|       |                                | 
|Name:  | Derek Pepler                   | 
|       |                                | 
|Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer | 
|       |                                | 
|Date:  | January 16, 2006               | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Trimax Corporation. and will be retained by
Trimax Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Newtek Business Services, Inc. (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry Sloane, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of the Company.



/S/    BARRY
SLOANEBarry Sloane, Principal Executive Officer


March 17, 2011



F-47
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Newtek Business Services, Inc. (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Seth A. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of the Company.



/S/    SETH A.
COHENCohen A. Cohen, Principal Financial Officer


March 17, 2011



F-48
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE WHITE.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### NORMAN v. NASH JOHNSON & SONS’ FARMS, INC.

No. 555A00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 390

Motion by plaintiffs and defendants to be allowed to withdraw appeal allowed 11 September 2001.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No. 333-118697) and Forms S-8 (333-123745, 333-112690, 333-83794, 333-107982, 333-58532, 333-93295and 333-83800) of Somera Communications Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDallas, Texas
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.11(d)

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


              THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made
December 16, 1999 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the
"Corporation") and Alan F. Schultz (the "Executive").

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that
certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on
January 3, 1995, December 19, 1995 and September 15, 1998 (the "Employment
Agreement"); and

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the
Employment Agreement to extend the term of employment under the Employment
Agreement.

              NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the parties
hereto agree as set forth below.

              1. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement
shall be amended to read as follows:

                    "The Executive's Annual Base Salary ("Annual Base Salary"),
              payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate of not
              less than $600,000 effective January 1, 2000."

              2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

              3. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement,
contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused
this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


                                                   VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                                   By:
                                                      --------------------------
                                                   Name:
                                                        ------------------------
                                                   Title:
                                                         -----------------------

                                                   -----------------------------
                                                           Alan F. Schultz
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00404-CR

NO. 03-09-00405-CR

Terrance Lashawn Lucas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-08-100083 & D-1-DC-08-100084

HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motions to dismiss these appeals are granted. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 10, 2009

Do Not Publish
The Crew:

Space shuttle Discovery’s 

S T S - 128 mission crew members, 

from left, are, Mission Specialist 

Jose Hernandez, Pilot Kevin Ford,

Mission Specialists John “Danny” 

Olivas and Nicole Stott, European

Space Agency astronaut Christer 

Fugelsang, Commander Rick

Sturckow, and Mission Specialist 

Patrick Forrester.

During the 13-day mission, Stott will 

transfer to the International Space 

Station to replace Tim Kopra as Expedition 20 flight engineer. Kopra

will return home aboard Discovery.

The M:

During Discovery’s S T S - 128 mission, 

the seven-member crew will deliver 

the Multi-Purpose Logistics Module 

Leonardo, containing life support and 

science racks, as well as the Colbert 

treadmill. They also will deliver a 

Lightweight Multi-Purpose Experiment

Support Structure Carrier, or LMC, 

to the station. 

S T S - 128 is Discovery’s 37th mission, 

the 128th space shuttle flight, and the 

30th mission to the station.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov SP-2009-08-082-KSC
DEFENDANT HOCUTT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF PAGE 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

KEITH WILEY §

§

Plaintiff §

§

vs. § 03

- 15 -00619- CV

§

HOCUTT, INC. §

§

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT HOCUTT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes Now, Hocutt, Inc., one of the Defendants in the above-styled case,

and files this Motion to Dismiss Interlocutory Appeal filed by Plaintiff Keith

Wiley and would should the Court the following:

I.

By Order dated September 11, 2015, the 201 st District Court of Travis

County, Texas g ranted Defendant Hocutt, Inc.’s Traditional and No Evidence

Motion for Summary Judgment.

On or about October 1, 2015, Plaintiff Keith Wiley filed a Motion for an

Interlocutory Appeal and an Interlocutory Appeal. The Court has no Jurisdiction

for this appeal. The Motion for an Interlocutory Appeal sited Texas Rules of

Appellant Procedure 168(c) as the basis for his Motion. Defendant would assert ACCEPTED

03-15-00619-CV

7321479

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/9/2015 8:57:49 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKDEFENDANT HOCUTT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF P AGE 2

herein that no such rule of Appellan t Procedure exists and therefore Plaintiff has no

basis for the filing of his Motion.

Further, Plaintiff’s Interlocutory Appeal sites that it is filed pursuant to

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 51.014; however, upon review of Civil

Practice and R emedies Code §51.014, the summary judgment granted in favor of

Defendant Hocutt, Inc. in this case does not meet any of the specific criteria set

forth in §51.014. The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over final judgments or

orders that are otherwise appealable. Lehman v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191,

195, 205 (Tex. 2001).

Accordingly, Defendant herein moves the Court to d eny Plaintiff’s Motion

for an Interlocutory Appeal and dismiss Plaintiff’s Interlocutory Appeal, and for

such other and further re lief to which it may be justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

NEAL P. FLAGG, P.C.

By : /s/ Neal P. Flagg

NEAL P. FLAGG

State Bar No.: 07102500

7 Innisbrook Court

Frisco, Texas 75034

Telephone: (214 ) 727

- 9941

Facsimile: ( 972) 722

- 5307

Email: neal@nealflagglaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

HOCUTT, INC.DEFENDANT HOCUTT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF P AGE 3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Defendant attempted to contact Pl aintiff Keith Wiley to discuss the contents

of this Motion but was unsuccessful and/or unable to reach agreement about the

contents of the Motion

.

/s/ Neal P. Flagg

NEAL P. FLAGGDEFENDANT HOCUTT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF P AGE 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has

been forwarded on this 9 th d ay of October

, 201 5 to the following :

Via E

- Service and Email

Keith Wiley

1714 Rutland Drive, #318

Austin, Texas 78758

Plaintiff , Pro

- Se

/s/ Neal P. Flagg

NEAL P. FLAGG
#### In the Matter of Steven J. Mitchell, Appellant, v Essex County Sheriff's Department et al., Respondents.

[788 NYS2d 243]

Mercure, J.E Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sise, J.), entered December 11, 2003 in Essex County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition.

A detailed recitation of the underlying facts of this matter is set forth in a prior decision of this Court *(Matter of Mitchell v Essex County Sheriff's Dept.,*302 AD2d 732 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 506 [2003]), in which we concluded that a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to compel respondents to comply with Civil Service Law § 72 and restore petitioner’s salary and leave benefits was properly dismissed because mandamus to compel did not lie and petitioner’s remaining claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. While petitioner’s appeal in that proceeding was pending before this Court, he commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to compel respondents to comply with Civil Service Law § 73 by providing him with a medical examination to determine whether he is fit to perform the duties of his former position of deputy sheriff and, if so, to reinstate him, place him in another vacant position or place him on a preferred list. Supreme Court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition, concluding, among other things, that the proceeding was time-barred. Petitioner appeals and we now affirm.

When a petitioner seeks relief in the nature of mandamus to compel, he or she is not aggrieved and, thus, the four-month statute of limitations for commencing a proceeding set forth in CPLR 217 (1) does not begin to run until an appropriate demand is made and refused *(see Matter of Roenke v State Univ. of N.Y.,*284 AD2d 781, 782 [2001]; *see also Matter of Armetta v Town of Bethel,*265 AD2d 789, 790-791 [1999]). In addition, Civil Service Law § 73 provides that an employee whose position has been terminated due to continuous absence for one year or more as a result of a nonoccupational disability “may, *within one year*
      *826
      *after the termination of such disability,*make application . . . for a medical examination to be conducted by a medical officer selected for that purpose” by the civil service employer (emphasis added). Here, petitioner informed respondent Essex County Sheriff that he no longer suffered from a disability and presented a report from a psychologist to support his assertion in May 2001. He did not demand reinstatement and the rights accorded to him under the Civil Service Law, however, until September 27, 2002, more than one year after he claims his disability ceased. Inasmuch as petitioner’s demand was not timely made under Civil Service Law § 73 *(see Matter of Pomakoy v Lombardo,*173 AD2d 13, 15 [1991]), Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition regardless of whether the proceeding was commenced within four months after the demand was made and refused. Our decision renders the parties’ remaining arguments academic.

Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-63034,
333-91095, 333-85298, 333-107825, 333-113201 and 333-123445) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-113812, 333-117625, 333-126267 and
333-127492) of our reports dated February 3, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, which appear in this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    BDO SEIDMAN, LLP  
|San Francisco, California
|March 7, 2006
M&F BANCORP, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY



Exhibit 23(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement No. 333-95973 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2007, except for Note 20 as to which the date is December 28, 2007, relating to our audit of the 2006 consolidated financial statements of M&F Bancorp,
Inc., appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of M&F Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ McGladrey and Pullen, LLP
|Frederick, MD                
|December 31, 2007            



78
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By

/s/     CHRISTOPHER C. JUREYChristopher C. Jurey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date:
  May 12, 2003
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F CryptoLogic Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Brian Hadfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Brian Hadfield                                                                                        

Brian Hadfield

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

| Date: | May 20, 2008 |
|-------|--------------|

 

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-1881-000]


Burley Butte Wind Park, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Burley Butte Wind Park, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0a6a5b2a3af8e8c898e85b39590908f9294a086859283ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d6b687f6e6243414443487e585d5d425f596d4b485f4e034a425b">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27951 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DR. JOHN-DAVID F. BARTOE

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

Dr. John-David Bartoe is Research Manager for the International Space Station 

(ISS) at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. He provides oversight for the Program 

Manager concerning the research capability, research hardware, and research plans 

of the ISS.

Prior to his present position, Dr. Bartoe was Director of Operations and Utilization 

in the Space Station Office of NASA Headquarters from 1990 to 1994. He also 

served as Chief Scientist for the Space Station from 1987 to 1990.

Before coming to NASA Headquarters, he flew on Space Shuttle Mission 51-F (July 

29 to August 6, 1985) as a civilian Navy payload specialist. A physicist by training, 

Dr. Bartoe was co-investigator on two solar physics investigations aboard this 

mission, designated Spacelab 2, that were designed to study features of the sun’s 

outer layers. In completing this flight, Dr. Bartoe traveled over 2.8 million miles in 

126 Earth orbits and logged over 190 hours in space. 

From 1966 to 1988, Dr. Bartoe worked as an astrophysicist at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., and

published over 60 papers in the field of solar physics observations and instrumentation. He received his B.S. in physics 

from Lehigh University (1966) and his M.S. and Ph.D. in physics from Georgetown University (1974 and 1976).

Dr. Bartoe is a member of the Association of Space Explorers, and is Chairman of the Space Stations Committee of the 

International Astronautical Federation. His awards include the NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal, the Navy 

Distinguished Civilian Service Award, the Flight Achievement Award of the American Astronautical Society, the NASA 

Space Flight Medal, and the NASA Skylab Achievement Award.

Born November 17, 1944 in Abington, Pennsylvania, he is married to Donna June Bartoe, and has three children.

MAY 1999

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058