alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of CryptoLogic Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: | March 30, 2010 | /s/ Stephen Taylor_______________________________ |
|-------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------|

Stephen Taylor

Chief Financial Officer

 

*This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.*

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Robert W. Siegel, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FC BANC CORP.., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FC BANC CORP.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert W. Siegel   
|                        |  | Robert W. Siegel       
|                        |  | Vice President,        
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### LORRAINE GRIEFF v. HAHNE’S DEPARTMENT STORE.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### In the Matter of Constantinos Papaioannou, Respondent, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 378]

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered August 1, 2003, which granted petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition, annulled respondent’s revocation of his pistol license, and directed that the license be reinstated, unanimously reversed, on the law, without *460costs, the petition denied, the proceeding dismissed and respondent’s determination reinstated and confirmed.

It is well settled that the possession of a handgun license is a privilege, not a right, which is subject to the broad discretion of the New York City Police Commissioner *(Matter of Kaplan v Bratton,*249 AD2d 199, 201 [1998]; *Matter of Fondacaro v Kelly,*234 AD2d 173, 177 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 812 [1997]), and respondent, by statute, has been delegated “extraordinary power” in these matters *(Matter of O'Brien v Keegan,*87 NY2d 436, 439 [1996]; *Matter of Trimis v New York City Police Dept.,*300 AD2d 162, 163 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 503 [2003]). Indeed, the only issue to be reviewed by this Court herein is whether the administrative decision to revoke petitioner’s pistol license was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion *(Iacono v Police Dept. of City of N.Y.,*204 AD2d 225, 226 [1994], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part 85*NY2d 848 [1995]; *Sewell v City of New York,*182 AD2d 469, 473 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 756 [1992]), and whether a rational basis exists for the agency’s determination. A rational basis exists when the evidence adduced is sufficient to support the Commissioner’s action *(see Matter of Bocchiano v New York City Police Dept.,*213 AD2d 264 [1995]; *Sewell,*182 AD2d at 473).

In this matter, respondent’s determination was based upon: petitioner’s October 2000 arrest for driving while ability impaired by alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [1]), which arrest cast doubt on his character and fitness to possess a firearm; petitioner’s failure to promptly report his arrest to the License Division; his failure to report his change of address to the License Division in a timely manner; the fact that he transported his handguns to an address other than that designated on his license without permission from the agency; and his failure to cooperate with respondent’s investigation of his arrest.

In view of the foregoing, we find respondent’s determination to revoke petitioner’s pistol license to be neither arbitrary and capricious, nor irrational. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-118341 and 333-128882) and Form S-3 (File
Nos. 333-127710 and 333-129213) of Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report
dated March 15, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule
Pursuant fo Article 5 of Regulation S-X
(in thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         119,106
<SECURITIES>                                    14,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,060
<INVENTORY>                                    121,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               488,653
<PP&E>                                          29,544
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,149
<BONDS>                                            424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           343
<OTHER-SE>                                     367,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,570
<SALES>                                        437,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               437,981
<CGS>                                          359,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   November 10, 2004              /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:   James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income Fund XIV,  Ltd. and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income Fund XIV,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2142

To authorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail Route, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2004

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal 

Heritage Trail Route, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL 

4 ROUTE. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

6 6 of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is 

7 amended—

8 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking 

9 ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$8,000,000’’; and 
2

•S 2142 IS 

1 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘10’’ and in2 serting ‘‘15’’. 

3 (b) GRANTS.—Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 

4 note) is amended—

5 (1) in section 4, by inserting ‘‘and, subject to 

6 the availability of appropriations, grants for,’’ after 

7 ‘‘technical assistance in’’; and 

8 (2) in section 6(b)(2) by inserting ‘‘and grants’’ 

9 after ‘‘technical assistance’’. 

10 (c) STRATEGIC PLAN.—Public Law 100–515 (16 

11 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended by adding at the end the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘SEC. 8. STRATEGIC PLAN. 

14 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 4 years after the 

15 date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall 

16 prepare a strategic plan for the route. 

17 ‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—The strategic plan prepared under 

18 subsection (a) shall describe—

19 ‘‘(1) opportunities to increase participation by 

20 national and local private and public interests in the 

21 planning, development, and administration of the 

22 route; and 

23 ‘‘(2) organizational options for sustaining the 

24 route.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        EMPIRE FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Empire
Financial Holding Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Kevin M. Gagne, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kevin M. Gagne
Kevin M. Gagne
Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 17, 2003
Order entered January 22, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00519
- CV
IN THE MATTER OF A.A ., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD
- 75173
- X 

### O RDER
Before the Court is Helen Arizor’s first amended motion to withdraw as counsel. Attached to t he motion is a copy of the trial court’s July 23, 2013 order grant ing Ms. Arizor’s request that she be discharged as counsel for appellant . The order is signed five months after Ms. Arizor filed appellant’s notice of appeal and five months before the clerk’s record was filed. However, a copy of the order was not included in the clerk’s record, and our record s continue to reflect appellant is represented by Ms. Arizor. Because the trial court has discharged Ms. Arizor as counsel for appellant, we GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Helen Arizor as appellant’s attorney of record.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determin e whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal. If the trial court determines appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. If the trial court determines appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it sha ll next determine whether appellant is ent itled to appointed counsel

.If the trial court determines appellant is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent appellant. If the trial court determines appellant is not e ntitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall then determine whether appellant has retained counsel to represent her. We ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, the reporter’s record from t he hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to (1) the Honorable Cheryl Lee Shannon, Presiding Judge of the 305 th Judicial District Court; (2) Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter of the 305 th Judicial District Court; (3) Helen Arizor; (4) appellant; and (5) counsel for appellee.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated thirty

- five (35) days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**SPORT-HALEY,INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald W. Jewell, Chief Executive Officer ofSport-Haley, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofSport-Haley, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 14, 2007               |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
|                             |
| /s/ DONALD W.  JEWELL            |   |
| Donald W. Jewell                 |
| Chief Executive  Officer         |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |

 

----
#### IN RE APPEAL OF WINSTON-SALEM JOINT VENTURE

No. 467P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 706

Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 2001. Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
#### CPC INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Ames Research Center

Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000

October 31, 2023

Reply to Attn of: ARC-DL

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

FROM: Christine M. Pham/DL

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the KBR 

November 14, 2023 Welcome Reception, OSTEM Better Together Conference

On November 14, 2023, KBR will host a Welcome Reception at the Tech Interactive 

Museum (Lower Atrium), located at 201 S. Market St., San Jose, CA 95113, from 5:30 pm 

to 8:00 pm. 

Approximately 490 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include members from academia, industry representatives, 

grantees, and contractors. The reception is anticipated to provide a forum for various 

discussions on STEM outreach and engagement. The estimated value of the event, 

including appetizers and iced tea, is approximately $20 per person. The event will also have 

a no-host bar at the expense of the individual. KBR is in control of all the arrangements and 

invitations for the event and is hosting this event independently, including independent 

funding. 

I find that the event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5

C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having 

NASA personnel attend the event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited 

persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and

operations. NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the 

interests of KBR may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves to the 

Welcome Reception. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance 

outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly 

influenced in the performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career 

positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only 

attend the event if they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event.

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the KBR, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, are not covered by this determination. Those 

employees should seek a separate determination from this office to determine whether or not 

they may accept the invitation pursuant to 5 CFR § 2635.204(g)(3)(i).

Christine M. Pham

Chief Counsel, Ames Research Center