alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PREPΑÁRΑTPE PΑRΑ RORGΑNIZ R EΑR

Kelly Martin-Rivers:

kelly.e.martin-rivers@nasa.gov

Maria Lott:

maria.l.lott@nasa.gov

ΑSTRO CΑMP®

El líder del programa, el educador o los 

facilitadores deben participar en un 

Desarrollo Profesional Educativo de 1 o 2 

días proporcionado por los Especialistas en 

Educación de la NASA para ser designado como 

un Programa Colaborativo oficial de ASTRO 

CAMP® de la NASA 2022.

Organizaciones eligibles deben de ser una

Organización de Servicio Juvenil, Escuelas,

Universidades, Museos o Bibliotecas que sirven 

estudiantes del 2-12 grado, y son abiertos a una 

colaboración cercana con el personal del 

Programa Colaborativo NASA ASTRO CAMP®

(ACCP), equipo educativo.

Especialistas en Educación ACCP de la NASA 

proporcionaran:

• ACCP Guía de Facilitadores

• Desarrollo Profesional Educativo para

Facilitadores Educadores

• Lista de materiales para actividades

• Recursos en línea de la NASA

• Materiales digitales

• Apoyo en línea del equipo de educación

ACCP de la NASA

Organizaciones colaborativas deben de proveer:

• Líder de campamento o educador

• Personal de apoyo

• Comodidades

• Materiales

• Mantenimiento de programa

• Resumen de datos del programa

NASA ACCP es una oportunidad para todas las 

Organizaciones de Servicio Juvenil para traer 

actividades de Misión Científica Compromiso de 

la NASA STEM a estudiantes en el 2-12 grado en 

su propia comunidad. Los desarrollos profesionales 

virtuales de la ACCP son proporcionados gratis para los 

educadores, líderes, y facilitadores que utilizan la Guía 

del Facilitador de la ACCP 2023, desarrollada de 

manera única para brindar apoyo, haciendo que 

las lecciones, los recursos y los desafíos de la NASA 

STEM sean accesibles para todos mientras confían en la 

metodología probada de la NASA STEM ASTRO CAMP®. 

La NASA ACCP consiste en actividades STEAM 

centradas en los estudiantes y basadas en estándares 

que utilizan los recursos de la NASA para brindarles 

a los educadores, líderes y facilitadores todo lo que 

necesitan para experiencias de aprendizaje STEM 

atractivas, y de alta calidad para todos los estudiantes. 

¡Usted puede ayudar a los estudiantes a fomentar los 

sueños profesionales del mañana y desarrollar metas 

que cambian la vida a través de las habilidades de 

ciencia, matemáticas y tecnología/ingeniería de Próxima

Generación al traer el programa NASA ACCP a SU SITIO!

NASA ACCP incluye una multitud de actividades STEM 

para seleccionar y solicitar un mínimo de 10 actividades 

de la NASA ACCP para que se entreguen durante un 

tiempo seleccionado con opciones para Desafíos de la 

Misión del Mundo Real de la NASA, y la recopilación de 

los datos/encuestas finales de su programa para ser 

devueltos al equipo de ACCP al final de cada evento 

para construir su portafolio exitoso con los reportes 

anuales de la NASA ACCP.

SMD-SciAct Infrastructure

2023

https://science.nasa.gov/scienceactivation-team/astro-camp
TERESITA DE JESUS ABREU

,

Petitioner,

v.

RIVERLAND ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL and BROWARD

SCHOOL BOARD

,

Respondent s

.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 3882

Opinion filed November 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of

– Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Goldstein of Jose M. Francisco, P.A., Miami , for Petitioner.

Raymond L. Grant of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale , for Respondent s

.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DISMISSED.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
**EXHIBIT99**

 

 

**RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

I, Everett F. Jefferson, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                   the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 8, 2002,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /S/ Everett F. Jefferson               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Everett F. Jefferson                   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

I, David E. Pertl, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that

 

(1)                                  the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 8, 2002,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /S/ David E. Pertl           |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | David E. Pertl               |
|   | Senior Vice President        |
|   | and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 31, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 0101 4
- CV IN RE REGINALD NOBLE , Relator On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F00
- 50025
- K 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang

- Miers, and E vans Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Before the Court is relator = s petition for writ of mandamus naming his appellate co unsel as respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over relator’s attorney. See T EX
. G OV = T C ODE A NN
. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator = s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

131014F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Uterburgh *v.*The State.

A mistake in an indictment as to the defendant’s name cannot be taken advantage of after a plea of not guilty.

The statute which permits every matter of defence to be proved under the general issue, on the trial of indictments, means matter in bar of the prosecution, not mere matter in abatement.

ERROR to the *Johnson*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Indictment against *Samuel Uterburgh*for knowingly suffering a horse to be run in a horserace, &c. Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to the Court.

A bill of exceptions shows, that a witness for the state testified, that one *Samuel Hudiburgh,*on, &c., a{(. &c., ran his horse along the state road, &c., with one *Hobbs,*each riding his own horse; that the defendant in this cause, then in Court, was the same person he saw ride the race; that he' had known said *Hudiburgh*thirteen years, and had never heard him called by the name of *Uterburgh,*nor by any other name than that of *Hudiburgh.*

On this evidence, the Court found the defendant guilty. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

There is no ground for this writ of error. Supposing the difference between the names *Uterburgh*and *Hudiburgh*to be sufficient to show a misnomer, the objection should have; been taken by a plea in abatement. That is the rule in criminal as well as in civil cases. It is true, the statute says that on the trial of all indictments, a defendant may plead the *203general issue, and give in evidence any and every matter of defence. it. S. 1843, p. 994. But by matter of defence, the statute means matter in bar of the prosecution, not mere matter in abatement. The defendant, by pleading not guilty, admitted his name to be *Samuel Uterburgh,*as he is designated in the indictment, and was estopped by that admission from afterwards denying that to be his name.

*PL.*and *PL. Brown,*for the plaintiff.

*A. A. Hammond,*for the state.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Technology Funding Medical Partners I, L.P. (the
Partnership) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Charles R. Kokesh, President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and
Managing General Partner of Technology Funding Ltd., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership as of and for the period
covered by the Report.


Date:   August 12, 2004   By:   /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                                 ------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Ltd.

Technology Funding Medical Partners I, L.P.

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of eLoyalty Corporation (the Company) for the Year ended December 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Kelly D. Conway, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William B. Noon, as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ KELLY D. CONWAY                       
|Kelly D. Conway                           
|President & Chief Executive Officer       
|                                          
|/s/ WILLIAM B. NOON                       
|William B. Noon                           
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, this certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The State, on the Relation, &c., *v.*Cunningham and Others.

Debt on the bond of a collector of taxes.' Breaches assigned: 1. That' the collector had not collected nor paid the county revenue nor any part thereof. 2. That he had collected the sum of 2,848 dollars, county revenue, but had not paid over the same nor any part thereof. 3. That he had not returned the duplicate and precept, nor had he paid over the county revenue. Fleas to the whole declaration: 3. That the bonds of the assessors were not approved by the clerk. 6. That the assessors did not verify on oath, nor deliver to the clerk, their lists of taxable property. 8. That the poll tax was fixed at 62i¿ cents, &e., although the law limited it to 50 cents, and that the collector collected the property tax and paid over the same. *Held,*that these pleas were bad.

ERROR to the *Putnam.*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Debt by the state, on the relation of a county treasurer, on a bond conditioned for the collection by *Cunningham,*the principal obligor, of the state and county revenue for the year 1839. The declaration avers the appointment of assessors, &c.; that their bonds were approved, &c.; that they made the assessments, &c.; that the assessments were verified by affidavit and approved, &c.; that a certain property tax and a certain poll tax were ordered to be levied, &c.; that *Cunningham*was appointed collector, &c., and gave bond, &c.; that a duplicate and precept were delivered to the collector, &c.; that the county revenue amounted to the sum of 2,848 dollars, &c. There are three breaches: 1. That the collector had not collected nor paid the county revenue, nor any part thereof. 2. That he had collected the sum of 2,848 dollars, county revenue, but had not paid over the same nor any part thereof. 3. That he had not returned the duplicate and precept, nor had he paid over the county revenue. There are fourteen pleas. The third, sixth, and eighth pleas, which are each pleaded to the whole declaration, were demurred to. The demurrers-were overruled, and judgment was thereupon rendered for the defendants.

The third plea is, that the bonds of the assessors were not approved by the clerk. The sixth plea is, that the assessors did not verify on oath, nor deliver to the clerk, their lists of taxable property. As the declaration charges that *Cun**340*ningham*collected the county revenue and failed to pay it over, &c., the third and sixth pleas are bad. The collector, after collecting the money, cannot refuse to pay it over, on such grounds as those stated in these pleas. The eighth plea is, that the poll tax was fixed at 624 cents, &c., although the law limited it to 50 cents; and that *Cunningham*collected the property tax, and paid over the same. The eighth plea is bad because it does not answer thé third breach, which alleges that the duplicate and precept had not been returned.

*J. M. Hanna,*for the plaintiff.

*E. W. MGaughey, A. Kinney, S. B. Gookins,*and *W. P. Bryant,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Glynn Wilson, the Chief Executive Officer of TapImmune Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: October 13, 2011
 By:          /s/ Glynn Wilson
 Glynn Wilson
 Chairman, Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                 AS ADOPTED TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Sense Holdings,
Inc., on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof, and is given solely for
the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in
my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew Goldrich                             Date:  April 15, 2003
-------------------------                              --------------
Andrew Goldrich
CFO, Sense Holdings, Inc.
#### HACKNEY v. CLEGG’S TERMITE & PEST CONTROL, INC.

No. 469P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 203

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
#### STATE v. HILL

No. 535A95-3

Case below: Harnett County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Harnett County, denied 18 December 2001.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ZACHARY ERWIN, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

C. CHESTER, Warden,

USP-Leavenworth, 

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-3041

(D.C. No. 5:10-CV-03010-RDR)

(D. of Kansas)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3041 Document: 01018434006 Date Filed: 06/03/2010 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         454,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,303,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                   422,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,643,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,994,796
<PP&E>                                       8,238,955
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,029,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,307,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,741,383
<BONDS>                                      3,537,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,630,904
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,307,182
<SALES>                                      4,351,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,351,308
<CGS>                                        2,400,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,146,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,154)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             143,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,338,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,338,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,338,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### Kien Gian-Nguyen, Appellant, v Sy Jimmy-Nguyen, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 869]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered April 20, 2004, which granted plaintiffs motion to vacate his default in opposing defendant’s prior motion to vacate a default judgment, and, insofar as appealed from, directed a hearing on the issue of whether the court has personal jurisdiction over defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We take judicial notice of the fact that, for purposes of the application of CPLR 2221, the original LAS Justice on the order dated June 10, 2002 was unavailable. Therefore, the motion court could properly reconsider the prior order of a justice of coordinate jurisdiction rejecting, as untimely under 22 NYCRR 202.48, defendant’s proposed settlement of an order granting its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction to the extent of directing a traverse. We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.6(C)


                    AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT


         This Amendment is entered into as of May 2, 2001 by and between
Resource Bancshares Mortgage Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("RBMG"), and
Harold Lewis, Jr. and amends that certain Change of Control Agreement dated as
of May 3, 2000, as it may have been previously amended (the "Change of Control
Agreement").

         1. Section 9 (g) of the Change of Control Agreement is hereby
amended by changing the date set forth therein to December 31, 2002.

         2. As amended hereby, the Change of Control Agreement shall be
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

         In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment to Change
of Control Agreement as of the date first above written.



                                             RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE
                                             GROUP, INC.



                                             By    /s/ Douglas K. Freeman
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Douglas K. Freeman
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                                    /s/ Harold Lewis, Jr.
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Harold Lewis, Jr.