alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. Lindstrom, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James M. Lindstrom                                                                            
|                                                                                                  
|James M. Lindstrom, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer



November 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John C. Garrison, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ICOP Digital, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

c. Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 24, 2006
Space-based Human Reliability Analysis Methodology

A NEW PARTNERING OPPORTUNITY

Reference No: NNJ14ZBH006L

Potential Commercial Applications: Department of Defense (DoD), commercial 

aircraft/spacecraft, and others

Keywords: human reliability, long duration space missions, low gravity physiological 

effects, human fatigue

Purpose:

NASA JSC seeks partners to better understand limitations and potential performance 

shaping factors (PSF) for a space-based Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) method. 

Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) is a bi-directional analysis 

method that is used for both performance prediction and accident analysis. Unlike first 

generation error analysis methods such as Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction 

(THERP), CREAM represents a second generation tool allowing for better analysis by 

abandoning the hierarchical structure of previous methods and providing better separation 

between objective and subjective error. Assistance with breaking apart the current 

ground based PSFs and recombining with the additional long duration, space-based PSFs 

is needed. 

Technology:

NASA JSC’s current HRA methodology, as well as all other methods currently available, 

is based on ground data sources. The Space Shuttle Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) 

was used to assess all known risk contributors, such as human/crew reliability, in support 

of the program’s risk-informed decision-making process. 

The Shuttle PRA used a combination of HRA techniques. Once the human actions were 

identified, the majority of them were initially quantified with an analysis methodology 

that is essentially based on the THERP, as described in NUREG/CR-1278, “Handbook of 

Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications.” The 

initial THERP-like quantification serves as a screening analysis to identify the riskdominant human errors. The risk-dominant human errors are then evaluated in further 

detail using the extended CREAM.

For future space programs with 200 to 900 day missions, crew fatigue, low gravity 

physiological effects, and crew health may become more significant factors in assessing 

human reliability; thus, the need to expand the capability of the current ground-based 

HRA techniques. 

The technology is in early development, i.e., Technology Readiness Level TRL-1.

R&D Status:

The current toolset includes both the CREAM and the THERP HRA approaches. Both of 

these approaches are based on humans tested on the ground. As human space missions 

head to Mars and asteroids, mission durations will last 400 to 900 days, which is much 

longer than any mission performed to-date. It is believed that long duration missions in 

low gravity can result in fatigue and physiological effects on human crews, which can 
impact their reliability of performing human actions; thus, the importance for the vehicles 

and mission training to better account for these effects on the crew. 

Intellectual Property (IP):

This Partner relationship may produce new IP that could be jointly owned by NASA and 

the partner or may become the property of the partner.
Exhibit 15.1



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors



Sify Technologies Limited



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-165248) on Form
S-8 of Sify Technologies Limited and its subsidiaries (the ‘Company’) of our report dated June 15, 2017 with respect
to the consolidated statements of financial position of Sify Technologies Limited as of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016
and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended March
31, 2017, March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2017, which report appear in the March 31, 2017 annual report on Form 20-F of Sify Technologies Limited.



|/s/ ASA & Associates LLP                      | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|ASA & Associates LLP                          | 
|Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 
|Chennai, India                                | 
|June 15, 2017                                 |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10j

                              ROWAN COMPANIES, INC.
                       2800 POST OAK BOULEVARD, SUITE 5450
                            HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056-6196


Fax:  401 / 752-4827

                                    September 14, 1999



Ms. Jane Levoie
Textron Financial Corporation
40 Westminster St.
Providence, RI  02903

Re:  Bareboat Charter dated December 1, 1984 for the Rowan-Halifax


Dear Ms. Levoie:

         Reference is made to the Bareboat Charter dated as of December 1, 1984
between Rowan Companies, Inc., as Charterer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Trustee for Textron Financial Corporation, relating to the Rowan-Halifax
drilling rig.

         Rowan hereby serves notice of its election to renew the Bareboat
Charter after the Basic Term for an additional 7.5 years as specified under
Section 18(a). Attached are Rowan's weighted average calculations in order to
determine the Fixed Rental Renewal rate during such Renewal Term.

                                                          Sincerely,

                                                          ROWAN COMPANIES, INC.


                                                          /s/ E. E. THIELE
                                                          E. E. Thiele
                                                          Senior Vice President


EET:sg

cc:      Mr. Michael Oller, Jr.                      302 / 651-8282
         Corporate Trust Administrator               302 / 651-8882 Fax
         Wilmington Trust Company
         1100 North Market St.
         Rodney Square North
         Wilmington, Delaware 19890


<PAGE>   2



                                                                     EXHIBIT 10j
                            [TFC TEXTRON LETTERHEAD]
                                The First Choice



September 27, 1999




E. E. Thiele
Senior Vice President
Rowan Companies, Inc.
5450 Transco Tower
2800 Post Oak Boulevard
Houston, TX  77056-6196

Re:  Bareboat Charter dated December, 1984 for the Rowan-Halifax

Dear Ed:

TFC acknowledges receipt of your letter dated September 14, 1999 wherein you
give notice of your election under Section 18 of the Bareboat Charter to renew
the Bareboat Charter after the Basic Term for an additional 7.5 years for a
semiannual fixed rental renewal of $2,617,489.13, payable in arrears on March 15
and September 15 of each year. The renewal term will commence on September 16,
2000 and end on March 15, 2008. The first semi-annual rental of $2,617,489.13
will be due on March 15, 2001.

Very truly yours,


/s/ JANE M. LAVOIE
Jane M. Lavoie
Assistant Vice President
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

Blaine F. Bates

Clerk of Court

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White U.S. Courthouse

1823 Stout St., Denver, CO 80257

(303) 335-2900

January 15, 2015

TO: All Parties

RE: Steven Norwood v. UST - CO, et al

BAP No.: CO-14-066

Bk. No.: 12-23027

The Court has today filed an order dismissing the appeal in the above case. A copy of the order 

has been served on all parties. In accordance with Tenth Circuit BAP Local Rule 8024-3(a), the 

mandate will issue promptly after the time to file a motion for rehearing expires.

Please contact this office if you have any questions.

Blaine F. Bates 

Clerk of Court 

cc: BK - CO

BAP Appeal No. 14-66 Docket No. 19-1 Filed: 01/15/2015 Page: 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20216

 

JULIO GONZALEZ, Individually and as natural 

parent and next friend of minor children 

Emanuel Gonzalez, Lorenso Gonzales and 

Judy Gonzalez; CARMEN GONZALEZ, Individually 

and as natural parent and next friend of 

minor children Emanuel Gonzalez, 

Lorenso Gonzalez, and Judy Gonzalez; 

EMANUEL GONZALEZ, minor child; 

LORENSO GONZALEZ, minor child; 

JUDY GONZALEZ, minor child; 

DALIA R READEAUX; JULIO GONZALEZ, JR; 

DIANA GONZALEZ

Plaintiffs-Appellants

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; U S CUSTOMS SERVICE; 

FORT BEND COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; 

ELIZABETH WIGGINTON, Special Agent; 

BEN D STEVENS; JEROME RUSSEL, Special Agent; 

PETER JACKSON, Customs Agent; 

PATRICIA MCCAULEY, District Director, 

United States Customs Service; 

THE SUGARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

COMERCIA BANK-TEXAS, formerly Sugar Creek National Bank

Defendants-Appellees

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-3885)

 

April 14, 1998

Before WISDOM, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DICK REID JENKINS, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4161

(D.C. No. 2:13-CR-00425-CW-EJF-1)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before GORSUCH and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before the court because the pro se appellant has not filed an 

opening brief. After the appellant’s stand-by counsel was allowed to withdraw, the court 

set an initial deadline for the pro se opening brief of March 24, 2015. When no brief had 

been filed, the court issued a deficiency notice to the appellant and sua sponte extended 

the brief deadline to April 13, 2015. Still having received no brief, the court entered an 

order on April 17, 2015, giving the appellant one last opportunity to file an opening brief. 

The final deadline was May 8, 2015. We warned the appellant that failure to file an 

opening brief could result in dismissal of this direct criminal appeal. Despite this 

cautionary language, the appellant has not filed an opening brief.

Accordingly, the above-captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution 

pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 22, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4161 Document: 01019434860 Date Filed: 05/22/2015 Page: 1 
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Lara Smith

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-4161 Document: 01019434860 Date Filed: 05/22/2015 Page: 2
ROWAN UNIVERSITY

Behind the Telescope: Building Girls' 

Confidence in STEM Through Hands-on 

Astronomy Outreach

Amy Barraclough 

2/1/22 -4/24/24

Through Behind the Telescope, the Edelman 

Planetarium will increase self-confidence and improve 

awareness of and interest in astronomy and related 

STEM careers in middle school girls across southern 

New Jersey through four public outreach events. 

Working with our partners, we will create authentic 

STEM experiences to show students that NASA is more 

than just rockets. The goals of the proposed program 

are to provide middle school girls with an increased 

awareness of and interest in astronomy and astronomy 

careers; increased confidence in their ability to perform 

science; and an opportunity to earn STEM merit 

badges. Each outreach event will provide learners with 

hands-on activities, access to scientists at NASA, and 

telescope observations. In addition, custom planetarium 

shows and video interviews with scientists will provide 

students with role models to highlight the diversity of 

people, professions, and backgrounds at NASA and 

worldwide.

List of Partners:

• Girl Scouts of Central and Southern New

Jersey

• Rowan University, Physics and Astronomy Club

Student educators Patrick and Cole demonstrate 

at Behind the Telescope event for Girl Scouts and 

their families.

Credits: Rowan University

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0437, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

October 2, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space 

Foundation Reception on October 3, 2023 

On October 3, 2023, the Space Foundation, a nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the 

Internal Revenue Code, along with co-sponsor Airbus will host a New Generation Space 

Leaders program & networking reception, at the Airbus Experience Center, 1101 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC, from 5:30 pm to 8:00 pm. The event is a speaking 

program and networking reception targeted to young space professionals 35 years and 

younger, in the DC area. 

Approximately 130 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, and 

members from the foreign government space agencies. The estimated cost of the event, 

including all food and beverages, is $56 per person. The Space Foundation is in control of the 

organizing, planning and invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow 

NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the 

event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the Space Foundation, such as procurement duties, program management, or 
2

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
#### In the Matter of William K., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 395]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J), dated July 17, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 22, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and, inter alia, placed him on probation for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion *(see Matter of Raymond A.,*136 AD2d 700, 701 [1988]), inter alia, in placing the appellant on probation for a period of 18 months *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [1] [b]; *Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]; *Matter of Douglas R.S.,*123 AD2d 868 [1986]; *Matter of Michael R.,*70 AD2d 521 [1979]). Furthermore, the Family Court adopted the least restrictive alternative commensurate with the appellant’s needs and best interests while affording the community protection *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]). Cozier, J.P., Smith, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.69

May 13, 2004David E. Pertl, SVP & CFO
Fresh Choice, Inc.85 Cochrane CircleMorgan Hill, Ca 95037

Dear David,

Based
on the company prepared financial statements as of April 18, 200 Fresh Choice,
Inc. has failed to comply with the terms of the Revolving Loan Agreement dated
October 5, 2001 (as subsequently amended) and the Commercial Deed Of Trust,
Financing Statement, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing dated August 13, 2001
(as subsequently amended) (together the Agreements) between Fresh
Choice, Inc. (Borrower) and Mid-Peninsula Bank (Lender)
wherein Borrower agreed to:


Maintain its Tangible Net Worth as defined therein at no less than $15,000,000.

Failure
to comply with the above provisions of the Agreements is a breach of
Borrowers Covenants and, if not cured, with the passage of time as
specified in the Agreements, would constitute an Event of Default under the
terms of the Agreements.

Subject
to the terms and conditions that follow, Lender hereby waives Borrowers
compliance to the above Covenant for the period ending June 13, 2004. Please
note that this waiver applies only to the specific Covenant described above and
does not constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same provision; nor
is it a waiver of a breach of any other provision of the Agreements or any of
the provisions of the Related Documents as defined in the Agreements.

Lender
reserves all of the rights and remedies available to it under the Agreements and
any Related Document if any subsequent breach of the same provisions or any
other provision of the Agreements should occur.

---

In
addition, by this acknowledgement, Borrower agrees that Section 4.9 of
the Revolving Loan Agreement referenced is hereby modified to read Barrower
will:

Not
make Total Capital Expenditures in excess of $1,700,000 during the fiscal year
ending in December 2004.

Your
acknowledgment of this letter shall constitute acceptance of the foregoing.
Unless accepted and acknowledged, the waiver described above shall terminate
automatically on May 23, 2004.

Very truly
yours,

/s/ Jonas H. StaffordJonas H. StaffordSenior Vice President

Acknowledged
on: May 17, 2004

Fresh Choice,
Inc.

By: /s/ Everett F. JeffersonAuthorized Officer
Everett F. JeffersonPresident and CEO
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                        ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE



To Netzee, Inc.


    We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States, the financial statements of Netzee, Inc. included in this
Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated February 8, 2000 (except
with respect to the matters discussed in Note 16, as to which the date is March
24, 2000). Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule included as Exhibit
99.1 is the responsibility of the company's management and is presented for
purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and
is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the
financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
February 8, 2000