alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

(2) NASA contracts sourced in the state in FY21; see FY21 NASA Economic Impact Report (3) Categories are not additive. For more information on FY21 Sample Obligations, please visit: NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS)

(1) For more information please visit: Value of NASA 

NASA Overall State Impact(1)

• Jobs Supported 40

• Economic Output $8,598,000

• State Tax Revenue $273,000

Moon to Mars Campaign State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 1

• Economic Output $224,000

• State Tax Revenue $4,000

Investments in Climate Change Research & 

Technology State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 7

• Economic Output $1,502,000

• State Tax Revenue $48,000

Sample Obligations(3)

Business $1,349,253 

• Other Than Small Business $0 

• Small Business $1,349,253 

 – 8(A) Program $0 

 – Economically Disadvantaged Women 

 Owned Small Business $256,476 

 – Historically Underutilized Business 

 (HUBZone) $0 

 – Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

 Business $450,893 

 – Small Business Innovative Research $0 

 – Small Disadvantaged Business $707,369 

 – Veteran Owned Small Business $450,893 

 – Woman Owned Small Business $256,476 

 – Small Business Only $0 

Educational $1,869,536 

Government $0 

Non-profit Institutions $0 

Leading State-based NASA Business 

Contractors

Sterling Computers Corporation $898,360 

METGreen Solutions, Inc $450,893 

Leading State-based NASA Education Funding 

University of Nebraska $1,869,536

Space Grant Consortium 

University of Nebraska at Omaha $800,000 

NEBRASKA

FY21 State Procurement Investments (2) $3.1 M
For more information about the

Economic Impact Report

for your state, go to:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street, SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers

www.nasa.gov

NASA Astronauts

(Former)

Clayton Anderson

There are 2 NASA Federal jobs and 23* contractors in the state 

of Nebraska. 

For every NASA federal job located in Nebraska, an additional 

19** jobs are supported in the state economy. For every million 

dollars’ worth of economic output generated by NASA federal 

jobs, an additional $6.5** million worth of output is sustained 

throughout the state economy. 

* Indirect effects are the purchases of goods and services by 

government agencies and private sector contractors, as well as by 

the industries that supply them.

** Multiplier based on IMPLAN Input Output (I-O) model. To learn more, 

please visit: https://blog.implan.com/understanding-implan-multipliers

NEBRASKA

40

NASA Jobs

Supported

Four Nebraska suppliers contributed to NASA’s Artemis program. An example of the state’s contributions is the supply of 

different electronic components like fiber channel connectors and switches for Orion.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES PETER POWER.

May 22, 1984.

Certification is granted, the judgement of the Appellate Division is reversed, and defendant’s plea of guilty is vacated and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, Monmouth County, for reassignment by the Assignment Judge to a new judge for the purpose of conducting a trial or the taking of a new plea of guilty.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS AT AND FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER
31, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          87,858                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,133                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,991                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,722,540                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (220,314)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,597,017                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,132,187                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,106                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,551,276)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,597,017                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,914                   6,292
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,757                     178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,599,045                 223,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             453,563                   6,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,023,451)               (223,638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0               (280,723)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 67,000                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,956,451)               (504,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.58)                  (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)                  (0.72)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2191 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

 108th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                S. 2191

  To provide the venue for the judicial review of actions by certain 
                           Federal agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2004

  Mr. Thomas introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide the venue for the judicial review of actions by certain 
                           Federal agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ACTIONS BY CERTAIN FEDERAL 
              AGENCIES.

    Section 1402 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(e) Judicial Review of Final Agency Actions by the Bureau of Land 
Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park 
Service, and Forest Service.--Any civil action seeking judicial review 
under chapter 7 of title 5 of a final agency action by the Secretary of 
the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land 
Management, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, or the Director of the National Park Service, or the Secretary 
of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, 
relating to the use of land administered by the Secretary, shall be 
brought only--
            ``(1) in the United States district court for the district 
        in which the land is located; or
            ``(2) if the land is located in more than 1 district, in 
        any of the districts in which the land is located.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date:   August 5, 2003                        /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                              A signed  original of this written
                                              statement  required by Section 906
                                              has been  provided  to CNL  Income
                                              Fund   XIV,   Ltd.   and  will  be
                                              retained  by CNL Income  Fund XIV,
                                              Ltd.   and    furnished   to   the
                                              Securities and Exchange Commission
                                              or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136206 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DEBORAH STEVENS, TONY DECK, Stephen J. Markman, BEVERLY HENKEL, VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ, Justices BARRY KELLEY, RUSSELL SOLES, DENISE SOLES, DORIS WALKER, and ELIZABETH CLINE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 136206 COA: 272329 Genesee CC: 00-069124-NZ CITY OF FLINT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 15.1



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors



Sify Technologies Limited



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the registration statement (No. 333-165248) on Form S-8 of Sify Technologies Limited and subsidiaries (the ‘Company’)
of our report dated June 22, 2016 with respect to the consolidated statement of financial position of Sify Technologies Limited
as of March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity
and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2016, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of March 31, 2016, which report appear in the March 31, 2016 annual report on Form 20-F of
Sify Technologies Limited.



|/s/ ASA & Associates                          | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|ASA & Associates LLP                          | 
|Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 
|Chennai, India                                | 
|June 22, 2016                                 |
Exhibit 23

M&F BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-95973 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 6, 2009, relating to our audit of
the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements of M&F Bancorp, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of M&F Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ McGladrey and Pullen LLP
|Frederick, MD               
|April 6, 2009
#### RAWLS & ASSOCS. v. HURST

No. 380P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 286

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1985

For the relief of Benjamin Cabrera-Gomez and Londy Patricia Cabrera. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2003

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Benjamin Cabrera-Gomez and Londy 

Patricia Cabrera.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BEN4 JAMIN CABRERA-GOMEZ AND LONDY PATRI5 CIA CABRERA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Benjamin Cabrera-Gomez and Londy Patricia 

9 Cabrera shall be eligible for the issuance of immigrant 

10 visas or for adjustment of status to that of aliens lawfully 

11 admitted for permanent residence upon filing an applica-
2

•S 1985 IS 

1 tion for issuance of immigrant visas under section 204 of 

2 that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 

3 resident. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Benjamin 

5 Cabrera-Gomez and Londy Patricia Cabrera enter the 

6 United States before the filing deadline specified in sub7 section (c), Benjamin Cabrera-Gomez and Londy Patricia 

8 Cabrera shall be considered to have entered and remained 

9 lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 

10 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

11 as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of immigrant visas or the application 

15 for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

18 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi19 dence to Benjamin Cabrera-Gomez and Londy Patricia 

20 Cabrera, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

21 officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following 

22 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

24 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

25 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
3

•S 1985 IS 

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of that Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2248

  To clarify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule classification of certain 
                             leather goods.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2004

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule classification of certain 
                             leather goods.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHER GOODS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 42 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by adding at the end of the Additional 
U.S. Notes, the following:
    ``3. For the purposes of heading 4202, the terms `plastic' and 
`sheeting of plastic' do not apply to goods having a plastic finish, or 
coating, of 0.15 mm or less in thickness, and such plastic finish or 
coating shall not be considered in determining the exterior or outer 
surface of any good.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after November 18, 1999.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, or any 
        other provision of law, upon proper request filed with the 
        Customs Service before the 90th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
        for consumption, of any good described in the amendment made by 
        subsection (a)--
                    (A) that was made on or after November 18, 1999, 
                and before the date of enactment of this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty or a lower duty if the amendment made by 
                subsection (a) applied to such entry or withdrawal,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment 
        applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2100

ANGEL F. CORDERO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-99-3019-2-18AJ, CA-99-2580-2-18AJ)

Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angel F. Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Angel F. Cordero appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting summary judgment to the Secretary of Transportation

and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cordero v.

Slater, Nos. CA-99-3019-2-18AJ; CA-99-2580-2-18AJ (D.S.C. July 28

& Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to
his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/Thomas A. CarrThomas A. CarrChief Executive OfficerMay 2, 2005/s/Stephen E. RiffeeStephen E. RiffeeChief Financial OfficerMay 2, 2005
Exhibit 12.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal
controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 28, 2009
    
    /s/ Raju Vegesna

Name: Raju VegesnaTitle: Chief Executive Officer