alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[784 NYS2d 441]

#### In the Matter of Thomas C. Kingsley, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

November 19, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Daniel A.*Drake, *Principal Counsel, Seventh Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Rochester, for petitioner.

*Stewart L. Weisman,*Manlius, for respondent.

*21OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 12, 1980, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Syracuse. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of misconduct, including conduct involving deceit and misrepresentation. Respondent filed an answer denying material allegations of the petition, and a referee was appointed to conduct a hearing. Prior to the hearing, the parties executed a stipulation that resolved certain outstanding issues of fact. After the hearing, the Referee filed a report, which the Grievance Committee and respondent move to confirm.

The Referee found, based largely upon the admissions of respondent, that respondent: directed the service of a subpoena on a witness without court approval at a time when no action was pending; failed to notify opposing or interested parties of the subpoena or the deposition that he conducted pursuant to the subpoena; filed an affidavit in support of an application to rescind the maintenance obligation of his client that contained a misleading statement; and engaged in an ex parte communication with the Support Magistrate assigned to hear the client’s matter. Additionally, the Referee concluded that the actions of respondent were not deceitful and resulted from his lack of training and experience in matrimonial matters.

We confirm the factual findings made by the Referee. We disagree, however, with the conclusion of the Referee that the conduct of respondent was not deceitful.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

> DR 1-102 (a) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4])—engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; and

> DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7])—engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer.

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation. We note, however, that respondent previously received two letters of admonition and that the Referee found that respondent’s hearing testimony lacked candor. Accordingly, *22after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for six months and until further order of the Court.

Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

(2) NASA contracts sourced in the state in FY21; see FY21 NASA Economic Impact Report (3) Categories are not additive. For more information on FY21 Sample Obligations, please visit: NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS)

(1) For more information please visit: Value of NASA 

NASA Overall State Impact(1)

• Jobs Supported 111

• Economic Output $17,411,000

• State Tax Revenue $535,000

Moon to Mars Campaign State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 5

• Economic Output $826,000

• State Tax Revenue $27,000

Investments in Climate Change Research & 

Technology State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 27

• Economic Output $4,339,000

• State Tax Revenue $132,000

Sample Obligations(3)

Business $550,854 

• Other Than Small Business $332,025 

• Small Business $218,829 

 – 8(A) Program $0 

 – Economically Disadvantaged Women 

 Owned Small Business $0 

 – Historically Underutilized Business 

 (HUBZone) $0 

 – Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

 Business $0 

 – Small Business Innovative Research $124,997 

 – Small Disadvantaged Business $0 

 – Veteran Owned Small Business $0 

 – Woman Owned Small Business $0 

 – Small Business Only $93,832 

Educational $4,429,772 

Government $0 

Non-profit Institutions $0 

Leading State-based NASA Business 

Contractors

Aero Specialties, Inc. $332,025 

Natural Intelligence Systems, Inc. $124,997 

Advanced Thermoplastic Composites, LLC $48,832 

Rink International, LLC $45,000 

Leading State-based NASA Education Funding 

University of Idaho $2,395,390 

Boise State University $1,955,344 

The College of Idaho $79,369 

Space Grant Consortium 

University of Idaho, Moscow $818,989 

IDAHO

FY21 State Procurement Investments (2) $6.1 M
For more information about the

Economic Impact Report

for your state, go to:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street, SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers

www.nasa.gov

NASA Astronauts

Kayla Barron*

James Reilly

There are 2 NASA federal jobs and 75* contractors in the state 

of Idaho. 

For every NASA federal job located in Idaho, an additional 

54.5** jobs are supported in the state economy. For every 

million dollars’ worth of economic output generated by NASA 

federal jobs, an additional $16** million worth of output is 

sustained throughout the state economy. 

* Indirect effects are the purchases of goods and services by 

government agencies and private sector contractors, as well as by 

the industries that supply them.

** Multiplier based on IMPLAN Input Output (I-O) model. To learn more, 

please visit: https://blog.implan.com/understanding-implan-multipliers

IDAHO

111

NASA Jobs

Supported

* Current

Four Idaho suppliers contributed 

to NASA’s Artemis program. 

An example of the state’s 

contributions is providing 

manufacturing services to 

NASA’s Orion spacecraft.
M&F BANCORP, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY



Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-95973 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2006, relating to the financial statements of M&F Bancorp, Inc., appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of M&F Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|Raleigh, NC              
|March 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          57,501
<SECURITIES>                                    32,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,180
<INVENTORY>                                     35,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,735
<PP&E>                                          71,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,643
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,743
<SALES>                                         43,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,355
<CGS>                                           18,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aviation Upgrade Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Torbjorn B. Lundqvist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                           /s/ Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 7, 2005




                                       33
(January 27, 2005)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cecil Whidbee, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 911]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), rendered June 13, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty , of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 2 to 6 years. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes, 95*NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

              STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      THREE MONTHS
                                                                                     ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                                                     --------------

                                                                      1996                                1997
                                                                      ----                                ----
<S>                                                              <C>                                  <C>
Net income (loss)                                                 $1,298,122                          $   (36,684)

Reduction of interest expense                                         30,836                                    -

Interest income                                                       20,714                                    -
                                                                   ---------                             --------


Net income (loss) applicable to common stock and
  common stock equivalents                                       $ 1,349,672                          $   (36,684)
                                                                 ===========                          ============

Weighted average shares of common stock
  outstanding                                                     12,988,720                           22,479,679

Escrowed shares                                                     (291,663)                            (291,663)

Weighted average effect of common stock
  equivalents                                                     11,915,951                                    -
                                                                  ----------                          -----------

Net shares of common stock and common stock
  equivalents used in net income (loss) per share                 24,613,008                           22,188,016
                                                                  ==========                           ==========

Net income (loss) per share                                             $.05                               $    -
                                                                    ========                              =======
</TABLE>
# Dryden Aeronautical Test Range

The communication antenna is used primarily for test flights to receive downlink flight data and video from test aircraft and...

The communication antenna is used primarily for test flights to receive downlink flight data and video from test aircraft and...

The Dryden Aeronautical Test Range at NASAâ€TMs Armstrong Flight Research Center in California uses radars, such as those in the...

The Dryden Aeronautical Test Range at NASAâ€TMs Armstrong Flight Research Center in California uses radars, such as those in the...

The Triplex 7M telemetry antenna at far right and the two radars to the left are a few assets of...

Jeff Koenig and Carlos TorresÂ Â at NASAâ€TMs Armstrong Flight Research Center in California prepare to support communications with the International Space...

The Dryden Aeronautical Test Range staff at NASAâ€TMs Armstrong Flight Research Center in California monitor all aircraft flights from the...

Sonja Belcher andÂ ZachÂ Springer show some of what they would do during a flight mission atÂ aÂ Telemetry and Radar Acquisition Processing System...

Kevin Knutson sits at a station in the main Blue Control Room at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in California...

Jesus Vazquez, Zach Springer and Sonja Belcher, from left, are at stations in the Mobile Operations Facility 5 at NASA’s Armstrong Flight...

Telemetry and Radar system operations console.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DIANE HSU.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32

M&F BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

M & F BANCORP, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 29, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Kim D. Saunders     |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Kim D. Saunders         |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 29, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Lyn Hittle          |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Lyn Hittle              |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1


                                   CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Charles A. Ross, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vista Exploration
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual reports is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  July 15, 2003



/s/  Charles A. Ross
--------------------
Charles A. Ross
President
|Exhibit 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.



|/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(principal executive officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Sandra L. SagerSandra L. Sager, CPAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|May 14, 2007
|------------

---
EXHIBIT 32

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of MainStreet BankShares, Inc., certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 USC, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications
contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|              |  |                                      
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: 3/13/06 |  | /s/ Cecil R. McCullar                
|              |  | Cecil R. McCullar                    
|              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|              | 
|Date: 3/13/06 |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith                  
|              |  | Brenda H. Smith                      
|              |  | Executive Vice President             
|              |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|              |  | Corporate Secretary