alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          -  [Docket Nos. PA10-1-000; ER09-555-000; ER05-1065-000]

With respect to the October 1, 2009 letter in Docket No. PA10-1-000 notifying Entergy Services, Inc. that the Office of Enforcement and the Office of Electric Reliability of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are jointly conducting an audit of Entergy Services, Inc., the staff of the Office of Enforcement is designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in the above referenced docket numbers, including all subdockets thereto, for purposes of 18 CFR 385.2202 (2009). Mark Hegerle, Olutayo Oyelade, Eric Vandenberg, Juan Villar, and Kevin Wierzbicki of the Office of Electric Reliability, Lawrence Greenfield of the Office of the General Counsel, Thomas Dautel of the Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, and Stephen Pointer of the Office of Energy Market Regulation are also designated as non-decisional in these dockets and subdockets.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-2729 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 2000

AN ACT

To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer

research for 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2000 ES

1 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR

2 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

3 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

Passed the Senate December 9, 2003.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 2000

AN ACT

To extend the special postage stamp for breast

cancer research for 2 years.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1298

REGINALD D. EVANS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; EXEL INC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 04953

- RMG

- SVH )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his claims against the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) but gra nting leave to amend his complaint to add a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act against Exel, Inc. After the district court filed its order, the court accepted Evans’ amended complaint. “[W]e have an independent obligation to verify t he existence of appellate jurisdiction” and may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties

. ” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 (internal quotation marks omitted). “R egardless of the label given a district court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order .” Id. Although the district court dismissed all claims against the SSA, it allowed Evans to amend his complaint to add a new claim against a new defendant, and the record reflects that Evans did in fact file such an amended complaint . Because Evans still has a viable claim in this ongoing matter, the district court did not issue “a final decision ,” and we lack jurisdiction over Evans’ appeal. Id. at 699. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court. We express no view on the ultimate disposition of Evans’ remaining cl aim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2141

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to enhance 

the ability to produce fruits and vegetables on soybean base acres. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2004

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to enhance the ability to produce fruits and 

vegetables on soybean base acres.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farming Flexibility 

5 Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRODUCTION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR 

7 PROCESSING ON SOYBEAN BASE ACRES. 

8 Section 1101 of the Farm Security and Rural Invest9 ment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7911) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following: 
2

•S 2141 IS 

1 ‘‘(i) PRODUCTION OF FRUITS OR VEGETABLES FOR

2 PROCESSING.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraphs (2) 

4 and (3), the producers on a farm may reduce the 

5 base acres for soybeans for the farm if the reduced 

6 acres are used for the planting and production of 

7 fruits or vegetables for processing. 

8 ‘‘(2) REVERSION TO SOYBEAN BASE ACRES.—

9 Any reduced acres of a farm devoted to the planting 

10 and production of fruits or vegetables during a crop 

11 year under paragraph (1) shall be included in base 

12 acres for soybeans for the subsequent crop year, un13 less the producers on the farm make the election de14 scribed in paragraph (1) for the subsequent crop 

15 year. 

16 ‘‘(3) RECALCULATION OF BASE ACRES.— 

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara18 graph (B), if the Secretary recalculates base 

19 acres for a farm, the planting and production of 

20 fruits or vegetables for processing under para21 graph (1) shall be considered to be the same as 

22 the planting, prevented planting, or production 

23 of soybeans. 
3

•S 2141 IS 

1 ‘‘(B) AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this sub2 section provides authority for the Secretary to 

3 recalculate base acres for a farm.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2057

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United 
States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the 
  members in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and 
 Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include 
                            domestic travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2004

Mr. Coleman (for himself and Mr. Dayton) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United 
States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the 
  members in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and 
 Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include 
                            domestic travel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION COSTS INCURRED BY 
              MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ON REST AND 
              RECUPERATION LEAVE.

    The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse a member of the United 
States Armed Forces for transportation expenses incurred by such member 
for one round trip by such member between two locations within the 
United States in connection with leave taken under the Central Command 
Rest and Recuperation Leave Program during the period beginning on 
September 25, 2003, and ending on December 18, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00275

- CV

Adriana P. PEREZ

, Appellant

v.

WEBB COUNTY

, Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVT000305 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

It is ORDERED that appellant, Adriana P. Perez, recover her costs of this appeal from

appellee, Webb County.

SIGNED June 3, 2015.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
##### 



KPMG LLP
    
    Telephone (416) 777-8500Chartered Accountants
    
    Fax           (416) 777-8818Suite 3300 Commerce Court West
    
    Internet      www.kpmg.caPO Box 31 Stn Commerce CourtToronto ON M5L 1B2
 AUDITORS CONSENT The Board of Directors
CryptoLogic Inc. We consent to the use of our report dated February 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of CryptoLogic Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2004, included in this annual report on Form 40-F. /s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants Toronto, Canada
February 16, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                           [LABONTE & CO. LETTERHEAD]




April 18, 2001


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporate Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washingtion, D.C. 20549


RE:  INTERNETSTUDIOS.COM, INC. - FORM 10K


Dear Sir/Madame:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10K of our auditors' report dated February 29, 2000 for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998.


Sincerely,





-----------------------------------------
LaBonte & Co.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-72730) and Form S-8
(No. 333-103663, No. 333-61248, No. 333-54976, No. 333-52634, No. 333-47020, No. 333-92619 and No. 333-81492) of SonicWALL, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear
in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|                                 
|San Jose, California             
|March 12, 2004
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00162

- CR
George Guadalupe Quintanilla v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1283

- 16

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 22 , 2019
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avici Systems
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul F. Brauneis, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President
of Finance and Administration and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    PAUL F. BRAUNEISPaul F. Brauneis Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Treasurer March 28, 2003




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Avici Systems Inc. and will be retained by Avici Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

TAYLOR G. WANG

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

PERSONAL DATA: Born June 16, 1940, in Mainland China. He is a Physicist at the

Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, and is a U.S. citizen. He is married, and has

two sons.

EDUCATION: Received a bachelor of science degree in physics in 1967, a master of

science degree in physics in 1968, and a doctorate in physics in 1971, from the

University of California at Los Angeles.

ORGANIZATIONS: Member, American Physical Society, Materials Research

Society, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sigma Xi, and a Fellow

in the Acoustical Society of America.

EXPERIENCE: After completing his doctorate, Dr. Wang joined the California Institute of Technology Jet propulsion

Laboratory (JPL) in 1972, as a senior scientist. He is currently Program Manager for Materials Processing in Space. At

JPL he was responsible for the inception and development of containerless processing science and technology research.

He is the Principal Investigator (PI) on the Spacelab 3 mission NASA Drop Dynamics (DDM) experiments, PI on the

NASA SPAR Flight Experiment #77-18 "Dynamics of Liquid Bubble," PI on the NASA SPAR Flight Experiment #76-

20 "Containerless Processing Technology," and PI on the Department of Energy Experiment "Spherical Shell

Technology." Dr. Wang has been conducting precursor drop dynamics experiments for the DDM in ground-based

laboratories employing acoustic levitation systems, neutral buoyancy systems and drop towers, and in the near

weightless environment provided by JSC's KC-135 airplane flights and SPAR rockets. These flights have helped to

define the experimental parameters and procedures in the DDM experiments to be performed on Spacelab 3. He is the

inventor of the acoustic levitation and manipulation chamber for the DDM and is the author of 70 articles in open

literature and 20 U.S. patents.

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE: Dr. Wang flew on STS-51B Challenger (April 29-May 6, 1985). STS51B/Spacelab-3 was launched from Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and returned to land at Edwards Air Force Base,

California. It was the first operational Spacelab mission. The seven-man crew aboard Challenger conducted

investigations in crystal growth, drop dynamics leading to containerless material processing, atmospheric trace gas

spectroscopy, solar and planetary atmospheric simulation, cosmic rays, laboratory animals and human medical

monitoring. At mission conclusion, Dr. Wang had traveled over 2.9 million miles in 110 Earth orbits, and had logged

over 168 hours in space.

MAY 1985

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-46008, 333-66434, and 333-113692) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan,Form S-8 (No. 333-117003) pertaining to the Findwhat.com 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and theEMI Replacement Option Plan, Form S-8 (No. 333-137458) pertainsto the MIVA, Inc. 2006 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, Form S-3 (Nos. 333-110067,333-102436, 333-76144, 333-115245,333-115247, and 333-118823), and Form SB-2 (No. 333-47240), asamended on Form S-3, and related prospectuses of our reportdated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofMIVA, Inc. (formerly FindWhat.com, Inc.) for the year ended December31, 2004 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPTampa, Florida
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alvin Hudson, Appellant.

[786 NYS2d 921]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 15, 2002 *(.People v Hudson,*296 AD2d 510 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 10, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Cozier and Krausman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  Netzee, Inc.
                   (formerly Direct Access Interactive, Inc.)
                       Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
                        Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
           (Schedule II to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  Balance at        Provision         Transfers                           Balance at
                  Beginning         Charged to          from                                  End
                  of Period           Expense        Acquisitions       Charge-offs        of Period
                  ----------        ----------       ------------       -----------       ----------
<S>               <C>               <C>              <C>                <C>               <C>
1997............  $    --           $    --          $     --           $    --           $     --
1998............       --            10,000                --                --             10,000
1999............  $10,000           $25,000          $276,750           $69,000           $242,750
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Thigpen, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 174]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered April 16, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s *Batson*challenge *(see Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79 [1986]) was properly denied as he failed to make the requisite prima facie showing of discrimination. The defendant relied solely on the number of black venirepersons challenged to support his request for race-neutral explanations, and offered no showing of facts and circumstances sufficient to raise an inference of a pattern of discrimination *(see People v Brown,*97 NY2d 500, 507-508 [2002]; *People v Jenkins,*84 NY2d 1001, 1003 [1994]; *People v Narvaez,*298 AD2d 603 [2002]).

The defendant’s contention that his right to be present at all material stages of the trial was violated by his absence from certain sidebar conferences at which prospective jurors were questioned is without merit *(see generally People v Antommarchi,*80 NY2d 247 [1992]). The record demonstrates that the prospective jurors who were questioned were either excused for cause by the trial court or were peremptorily challenged by the People. Therefore, the defendant’s absence does not require reversal *(see People v Roman,*88 NY2d 18 [1996]; *People v Persad,*306 AD2d 359 [2003]; *People v Davis,*227 AD2d 414 [1996]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Kohl, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 

/s/ Daniel J.Kohl                                

Daniel J. Kohl 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

Date: August 9, 2005