alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE
TRUSTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    17
<PP&E>                                          87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,496
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,196
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   May 11, 2004                      /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                          Title:   Chief Executive Officer

                                          A  signed  original  of  this  written
                                          statement  required by Section 906 has
                                          been  provided to CNL Income Fund XIV,
                                          Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by  CNL
                                          Income Fund XIV, Ltd. and furnished to
                                          the Securities and Exchange Commission
                                          or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.16
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
NEWTOWER TRUST COMPANY MULTI-EMPLOYER PROPERTY TRUST,   THE MANAGEMENT NETWORK GROUP, INC.,  Lighton Plaza I, Overland Park, Kansas
 THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT NEWTOWER TRUST COMPANY MULTI-EMPLOYER PROPERTY TRUST, Landlord THE MANAGEMENT NETWORK GROUP, INC., Tenant
 Recitals of Fact
 Lease Premises Building
   Amendment
 Expansion of Premises. Expansion Area Exhibit A i.e.
 -1-




---



##### 



Expansion Commencement Date.
 Change in Pro Rata Share. i.e.
 Rent for Duration of Term.
 Lease
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    LeaseRate
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RatePer
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    PerSquare
    
    
    
    
    
    Monthly
    
    Square
    
    Annual
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalFoot
    
    Annual Rent
    
    Rent
    
    Foot
    
    Rent
    
    Monthly
    
    Monthly(Prior
    
    Amount for
    
    Amount
    
    (Expansi
    
    Amount for
    
    Rent for
    
    Rent forPrem-
    
    Prior
    
    for Prior
    
    on Prem-
    
    Expansion
    
    Expansion
    
    FullMonths
    
    ises)
    
    Premises
    
    Premises
    
    ises)
    
    Area
    
    Area
    
    PremisesExpansion Commm.Datethrough
8-31-07
    
    $
    21.50
    
    
    $
    101,157.00
    
    
    $
    8,429.79
    
    
    $
    22.50
    
    
    $
    NA
    
    
    $
    3,318.75
    
    
    $
    11,748.549-1-07
through
8-31-08
    
    $
    22.00
    
    
    $
    103,510.00
    
    
    $
    8,625.83
    
    
    $
    22.50
    
    
    $
    39,825.00
    
    
    $
    3,318.75
    
    
    $
    11,944.589-1-08
through
8-31-09
    
    $
    22.50
    
    
    $
    105,862.50
    
    
    $
    8,821.88
    
    
    $
    23.00
    
    
    $
    40,710.00
    
    
    $
    3,392.50
    
    
    $
    12,214.389-1-09
through
8-31-10
    
    $
    23.00
    
    
    $
    108,215.00
    
    
    $
    9,017.92
    
    
    $
    23.50
    
    
    $
    41,595.00
    
    
    $
    3,466.25
    
    
    $
    12,484.17
 Tenant Improvements; Allowance. Exhibit B
 -2-




---



##### 



Change in Base Year.
 Option.
 No Other Changes.
  Landlord:
    
    NEWTOWER TRUST COMPANYMULTI-EMPLOYER PROPERTY TRUST,a trust organized under
12 C.F.R. Section 9.18By:
    
    Kennedy Associates Real Estate Counsel,
LP, Authorized SignatoryBy:
    
    Kennedy Associates Real Estate
Counsel GP, LLC, General PartnerBy:
    
    Kennedy Associates Real 
Estate Counsel, Inc.By:Name:Its:
 Tenant:
    
    THE MANAGEMENT NETWORK GROUP,INC.,a Delaware corporationBy:Print Name:Print Title:
 -3-




---



##### 



Exhibit A
  -4-




---



##### 



Exhibit B
   -5-
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0784

_____________________________

GLEN SCHOOLEY,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. as 

Trustee for Option One 

Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-

FXD2, LINDA FLOWERS and

SHARON CASON,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

Russell S. Roberts, Judge.

January 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Glen Schooley, pro se, Appellant.

Kimberly George of Deluca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Option One 

Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-FXD2; Thomas L. Lutz of Goodwin Law 

Group, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellee Linda Flowers; Sharon Cason, 

pro se, Appellee.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60633 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROGER FRANKLIN HOLTZCLAW, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-283PS

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roger Franklin Holtzclaw appeals from the district court’sdenial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Holtzclaw's speedytrial contentions were properly dismissed. See Buckelew v. United States , 575 F.2d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir. 1978) (a matter that has already been determined on direct appeal need not be reconsidered in a § 2255 motion). Holtzclaw's contentions thatNo. 95-60633 - 2 - counsel was ineffective at trial and on appeal were also properly dismissed as Holtzclaw made no showing that counsel was deficient or that he was prejudiced by the alleged errors. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Lockhart v. Fretwell , 506 U.S. 364, 369 (1993). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         184,865
<SECURITIES>                                   741,228
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,112,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,500
<INVENTORY>                                  4,196,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,446,242
<PP&E>                                       4,758,283
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,369,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,314,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,519
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,128,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,314,337
<SALES>                                      2,843,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,577,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,740,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2198

To provide for refinancing of consolidated student loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To provide for refinancing of consolidated student loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consolidated Student 

5 Loan Reduction Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFINANCING AUTHORITY FOR CONSOLIDATED 

7 STUDENT LOANS. 

8 (a) FEDERAL CONSOLIDATION LOANS.—Section 

9 428C of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

10 1078–3) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(g) REFINANCING AUTHORITY.—
2

•S 2198 IS 

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of this part and subject to paragraph (2), 

3 a borrower may refinance a consolidation loan at a 

4 fixed rate that is equal to the interest rate for Fed5 eral Stafford Loans under section 427A(k) at the 

6 time the borrower applies for the refinancing. 

7 ‘‘(2) ONE PERCENT INTEREST RATE DIF8 FERENCE REQUIRED.—A borrower may refinance a 

9 consolidation loan under this subsection whenever 

10 the interest rate for the consolidation loan to be refi11 nanced exceeds the fixed interest rate determined 

12 under paragraph (1) by 1 percent or more. 

13 ‘‘(3) STUDENT FEE PROHIBITED.—No student 

14 shall be charged a fee to refinance a consolidation 

15 loan under this subsection.’’. 

16 (b) FEDERAL DIRECT CONSOLIDATION LOANS.—

17 Section 455(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

18 U.S.C. 1087e(g)) is amended—

19 (1) by striking ‘‘A borrower’’ and inserting the 

20 following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A borrower’’; and 

22 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) REFINANCING AUTHORITY.—

24 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any 

25 other provision of this part and subject to sub-
3

•S 2198 IS 

1 paragraph (B), a borrower may refinance a 

2 Federal Direct Consolidation Loan at a fixed 

3 rate that is equal to the interest rate for Fed4 eral Stafford Loans under section 427A(k) at 

5 the time the borrower applies for the refi6 nancing. 

7 ‘‘(B) ONE PERCENT INTEREST RATE DIF8 FERENCE REQUIRED.—A borrower may refi9 nance a consolidation loan under this subsection 

10 whenever the interest rate for the consolidation 

11 loan to be refinanced exceeds the fixed interest 

12 rate determined under subparagraph (A) by 1 

13 percent or more. 

14 ‘‘(C) STUDENT FEE PROHIBITED.—No 

15 student shall be charged a fee to refinance a 

16 consolidation loan under this paragraph.’’.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRANDON M. KREIER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-182

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 18, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Lee County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Adaway v. State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Steward v. 

State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2004); Gibson v. State, 721 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Graves v. State, 704 

So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      20,883,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,928,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,653
<INVENTORY>                                  2,033,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,474,034
<PP&E>                                      20,182,551
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,715,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,006,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,829,306
<BONDS>                                      5,393,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,461
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,782,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,006,768
<SALES>                                      1,239,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,135,949
<CGS>                                        1,651,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,980,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                63,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,507,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,507,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,507,798)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)
        

</TABLE>
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

                           For the years ended          August 19, 1999
                           June 30,                           (Inception) to
                            2004       2003                 June 30, 2004

Revenue                   -             -                            -

General and
administrative
expenses             1,005             460                  10,790
Total expenses     1,005             460                  10,790

Net (loss)            (1,005)           (460)                (10,790)

Weighted average
number of
common shares
outstanding -
basic and
fully diluted       4,500,000     4,500,000

Net (loss)
per share -
basic and
fully diluted          (0.00)            (0.00)

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME REDDING.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-728

In Re: CARRINGTON LAMONT HARRELL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CR-90-27-G, CA-97-263)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carrington Lamont Harrell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carrington Lamont Harrell brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to rule on his objections

to the report of a magistrate judge. The district court ruled on

the objections and adopted and affirmed the report by order dated

October 29, 1997. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
---

|Exhibit 13.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Silver
Standard Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                      
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the registrant.

|Date: August 10, 2009           | 
|------------------------------- | 
|                                | 
|/s/ Robert A.
      Quartermain | 
|Robert A. Quartermain           | 
|President                       | 

---
**Book 45                     Page 243**

**MINUTES - EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS**

**December 18, 2008**

On December 18, 2008 the Chief Justice and Justices of the Court met pursuant to adjournment.  Ms. Denise Pacheco, Clerk, duly opened the Court at which time the following official proceedings were conducted, to-wit:

**The following miscellaneous actions were taken by the Court:**

None

**The following miscellaneous orders were entered by the Court:**

**Cause NumberStyleAction**

**The following cases were set for submission:**

**Cause NumberStyle**

**The following cases were submitted for the Court=s consideration with oral argument:**

**Cause NumberStyle**

08-06-00005-CRLawrence Few v. The State of Texas, from El Paso

08-08-00082-CVIn Re: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Texaco, Inc. and Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc., and Original Proceeding in Mandamus

08-08-00066-CVTexaco, Inc., Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc., and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. James K. Norwood, Maurice Meyer, III and John r. Norris, III, Co-Trustees of Texas Pacific Land Trust, from Reeves

08-08-000083-CVIn Re: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Texaco, Inc. and Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc., and Original Proceeding in Mandamus

08-08-00067-CVTexaco, Inc., Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc., and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. James K. Norwood, Maurice Meyer, III and John R. Norris, III, Co-Trustees of Texas Pacific Land Trust, from Reeves,

08-08-00084-CVIn Re: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., an Original Proceeding in Mandamus

08-08-00068-CVChevron U.S.A. Inc. v. James K. Norwood, Maurice Meyer, III, and John r. Norris, III, Co-Trustees of Texas Pacific Land Trust, from Reeves,

08-07-00239-CVBlueberry Sales, L.L.P. v. Barry Callebaut, AG., from El Paso

08-07-00072-CVMario Aguilar v. Socorro Independent School District, from El Paso

08-08-00221-CVIn Re: ReadyOne Industries, Inc. and Amalia Lopez, and Original Proceeding in Mandamus

**The following opinions and/or judgments were issued by the Court:**

**Cause NumberStyleAction**

**The following mandates were issued by the Court:**

**Cause NumberStyleAction**

The Court then adjourned until the next scheduled day of business.

David Wellington Chew, Chief Justice