alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Konstantine Sarafis, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of GeneMax Corp.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.       Date: April 29, 2005 By:  *“Konstantine Sarafis”*   Konstantine Sarafis, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### STATE v. WOODARD

No. 519PA01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 75

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 14 September 2001.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6923
WILLIAM A. FISHER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-150) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, Fisher's motions for bail pending appeal, for retrial, and to call witnesses, and dismiss theappeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. Commonwealth , No. CA-96-150 (E.D. Va. May 10, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### B. L. McGinnis *v.*T. A. Robinson et al.

Conveyance of Land as Collateral Security, Only — Lapse of Time Operates in Favor of Right to Redeem.

Where it sufficiently appears that the cited consideration of a conveyance was wholly or chiefly for borrowed money, *held,*that such conveyance was made and accepted as collateral security only.

APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 2, 1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judg-e Robertson :

It sufficiently appears that the recited consideration of the con-i' eyance from McGinnis, the appellant, to I. A. Robinson, deceased, whose heirs are the appellees, was wholly or chiefly borrowed money. This fact and the decedent’s levy, forbearance, and repeated declarations, and virtual recognitions, satisfy this court that the conveyance was, in fact, made and accepted as a collateral security only, and the more especially as this, though not admitted, is nevertheless not denied by the appellees on their personal knowledge.

And, as McGinnis continued in possession of the land now in controversy, the lapse of time operates presumptively in favor of his right to redeem rather than against it.

Whether the appellant still owes anything and how much is the only difficult question, and the case has been carelessly prepared on this point and may require moré satisfactory preparation for securing a near approach to precise justice.

As now presented the facts authorize the presumption that the 134 acres sold by the decedent to Quisenbury for about $402 reim- * *402bursed that much of the debt then due and left but a small balance. On that balance, whatever it was, the appellant should be charged with interest. But he should not be charged with rent. And if he owed the decedent on any other account this, too, should be paid before redemption.

On the return of the cause the balance due, if any, should be ascertained and reported by a commissioner. And whenever said payment shall be established or made, the appellees should be required to reconvey without warranty to the appellant the title *to*the land claimed by him in this suit.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officers of Trintech Group PLC (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Cyril McGuire                    
| |  | CYRIL MCGUIRE                        
| |  | Chief Executive Officer              
| | 
| |  | /s/ R. Paul Byrne                    
| |  | R. PAUL BYRNE                        
| |  | Chief Financial Officer and
President



Dated: May 17, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure to this statement



A signed original this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Trintech Group PLC and will be retained by Trintech Group PLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1875 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 400
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1875

   To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the 
  Public Health Service Act, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
 extend the mental health benefits parity provisions for an additional 
                                 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2003

Mr. Gregg (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
                     which was read the first time

                           November 18, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the 
  Public Health Service Act, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
 extend the mental health benefits parity provisions for an additional 
                                 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mental Health Parity Reauthorization 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MENTAL HEALTH PROVISIONS.

    (a) ERISA.--Section 712(f) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1185a(f)) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
    (b) PHSA.--Section 2705(f) of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300gg-5(f)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
    (c) IRC.--Section 9812(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``December 
31, 2004''.

                                                       Calendar No. 400

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the 
  Public Health Service Act, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
 extend the mental health benefits parity provisions for an additional 
                                 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 18, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### STATE v. REEVES

No. 346P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 186

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 December 2001.
#### Joseph Guarino, Respondent, v 233 East 69th Street Owners Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants, and PLN Construction, Inc., Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 302]

*653In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, PLN Construction, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Levine, J.), dated June 24, 2003, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiff properly commenced a direct action against it by the service of an amended complaint naming it as a defendant, after the service of the third-party complaint upon it and before it served a third-party answer *(see*CPLR 1009; *Micari v Van Kesteren,*121 AD2d 524 [1986]; *Johnson v Equitable Life Assur. Socy. of U.S.,*22 AD2d 141 [1964], *affd*18 NY2d 933 [1966]; *see also Patrician Plastic Corp. v Bernadel Realty Corp.,*25 NY2d 599, 607 [1970]).

Moreover, since the issue of the appellant’s liability to the plaintiff under the Labor Law was not fully litigated before the filing of the plaintiffs motion, the doctrine of law of the case doctrine did not apply *(see People v Evans,*94 NY2d 499, 502 [2000]; *Engel v Eichler,*300 AD2d 622, 623 [2002]; *see also Gilligan v Reers,*255 AD2d 486, 487 [1998]). The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) against the appellant, which was a contractor within the meaning of the statute *(see Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply,*82 NY2d 555 [1993]; *Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494 [1993]; *Williams v Dover Home Improvement,*276 AD2d 626 [2000]; *cf. Russin v Picciano & Son,*54 NY2d 311 [1981]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Maritime Ventures, Inc.

(the  "Company)  on Form 10-KSB for the year  ended June 30,  2005, Jehu

Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of

his knowledge:



(1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of

Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly

presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition

and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jehu Hand



Jehu Hand

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(principal executive and financial officer

March 31, 2006











<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2044 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2044

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2004

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed 
Mussie Tesfamical shall be held and considered to have been lawfully 
admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Alemseghed Mussie 
Tesfamical, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 1, during the current fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).

            Passed the Senate October 11, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### REMEDIAL EDUCATION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. v. ESSEX COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES COMMISSION.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 191 *N.J.Super.*524)
#### AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION v. THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*486)
PORTAGE PARTNERS, LTD.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

                                     For the years ended        August 18, 1999
                                     June 30,                    (Inception) to
                                     2003              2002       June 30, 2003
CASH FLOWS
FROM
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)                   $(460)                  $(687)            $(4,922)
Increase in
accounts
payable                      460                        687              #2,347

Net cash
(used) by
operating
activities                     -                             -          (2,575)

CASH FLOWS
FROM
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from
stock issuances         -                             -              2,575

Net cash
provided by
financing
activities                    -                            -              2,575

Net increase
in cash                                                                       -
Cash   beginning                                                          -
Cash   ending                                                               -

Supplemental
disclosures:
Interest paid              -                                  -               -
Income taxes
paid                          -                                 -             -

Non-cash
transactions:
Shares issued
for dividend                -                                 -          $2,000

Number of
shares issued            -                                -         2,000,000
for dividend

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.
Page 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Kohl, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Daniel J. KohlDaniel J. KohlPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: May 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         536,680
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               795,976
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,518,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,202,789
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    70
<COMMON>                                       1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,314,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,518,642
<SALES>                                        2,627,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,627,004
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,001,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             187,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                721,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                   186,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            535,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (543,870)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,739)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerrold Dowdey, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 875]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered April 21, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record does not support defendant’s claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by his mental condition *(see People v Alexander,*97 NY2d 482 [2002]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, M P Vijay Kumar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Sify Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sify Technologies Limited.

Date: August 24, 2012



By:

/s/ M P Vijay KumarName: M P Vijay KumarTitle: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.