alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                           
<ARTICLE>                                       5
                                                 
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    8748821
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1646731
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           81970932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                               52622573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             81970932
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          4917571
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          2599981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         566679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           1750911
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       1750911
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              1750911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Susan L. Walberg, Appellant, v Edward A. Rudden, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 666]

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), entered April 29, 2003, which, without a hearing, granted the father’s motion to dismiss the petition and dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court properly dismissed, without a hearing, her petition to modify an existing order which suspended her visitation with her child *(see Matter of Blake v Vilbig,*288 AD2d 470 [2001]; *Matter of Milhollen v Voelpel,*270 AD2d 422 [2000]). One who seeks to modify an existing order of visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing *(see Matter of Steinharter v Steinharter,*11 AD3d 471 [2004]; *Matter of Timson v Timson,*5 AD3d 691 [2004]; *Matter of Blake v Vilbig, supra; Matter of Milhollen v Voelpel, supra; Matter of Rosenberg v Rosenberg,*261 AD2d 623 [1999]). The mother’s allegations, even if true, would not give rise to finding of a change in circumstances warranting modification of the prior order.

Moreover, the Family Court was fully familiar with relevant background facts regarding the parties and the child from several past proceedings without the need for a further hearing *(see Matter of Pignataro v Davis,*8 AD3d 487, 488 [2004]; *Matter of Horn v Zullo,*6 AD3d 536 [2004]; *Matter of Smith v Molody-Smith,*307 AD2d 364 [2003]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### PETER SHAPIRO, THE ESSEX COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND THE COUNTY OF ESSEX v. GEORGE ALBANESE, COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*237)
#### Troy D. DREW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Warden; W.R. Hensley, Hearings Officer, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 03-6919.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Troy D. Drew, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Troy D. Drew appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Drew v. Young,*No. CA-03-63-7 (W.D.Va. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

www.nasa.gov

 International Visit Coordinators (Updated: 12/11/2023)

Center Name Phone Email 

ARC Gabriel Lozano

Frances Quintillan

650.604.4450

650.604.1677

gabriel.lozano@nasa.gov

frances.v.quintillan@nasa.gov

AFRC Darlene Homiak 661-276-3064 darlene.homiak@nasa.gov

GRC

Jeffrey Allen

Alexander M. 

Oppenheim

216-433-6308

216-433-2584

jeffrey.m.allen@nasa.gov

alexander.m.oppenheim-1@nasa.gov

GSFC/WFF Brenda Dunlap

Karen Cherrix(alt)

301-286-8300

757.824.2536

brenda.l.dunlap@nasa.gov

karen.r.cherrix@nasa.gov

HQ Renique Fludd 202.358.1192 renique.fludd@nasa.gov

JPL

Keyla James

Wayne Lee

818-354-2092

818-354-6736

keyla.l.james@jpl.nasa.gov

wayne.lee-154247@jpl.nasa.gov

JSC

Kelli Graham

LeAndra LaMonsMcClain

Edwina Gloor

832-421-3421

281-483-0479

281-483-6255

Kelli.graham-1@nasa.gov

leandra.n.lamons-mcclain@nasa.gov

edwina.m.gloor@nasa.gov

KSC Tina Delahunty 321-607-2612 tina.delahunty@nasa.gov

LARC Staci Stewart 757-864-5298 staci.p.stewart@nasa.gov

MSFC Paul Walker

Scott Beard (alt)

202-306-1449

256.544.1354

paul.walker@nasa.gov

scott.beard@nasa.gov

SSC

Mary Treat

John Schreck

228-688-3916

228-688-2043

mary.treat-1@nasa.gov

john.n.schreck@nasa.gov
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.6A

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                 GRAPHIC PACKAGING EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
              (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 14, 1995)


1. PLAN SPONSOR: Graphic Packaging International Corporation.

2. AMENDMENT OF PLAN: The following amendments to the Graphic Packaging Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective November 14, 1995) (the
"Plan") are adopted effective February 28, 2003.

3. SECTION 5 OF THE PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ IN FULL AS FOLLOWS:

         5. OFFER OF STOCK

         As of the first day of each month during the term of the Plan, the
         Company shall be deemed to have made an offer (the "Offer") to each
         eligible employee to purchase up to $1,000 in value of Stock. Each such
         Offer shall have a term of one month. On or after the effective date of
         an Offer, each then eligible employee may purchase, through payroll
         deductions, as many shares (including fractional shares) of Stock as he
         may wish up to $1,000 (but not less than $10) of the compensation (as
         defined below) to be received by him during the term of the Offer. An
         eligible employee can accept the offer by enrolling in the Plan and
         authorizing payroll deductions, subject to the terms of the Plan.

         The Plan shall be suspended effective February 28, 2003, such that the
         last Offer prior to such suspension shall be February 1, 2003, until
         such time as the Company determines to reactivate the Plan in its sole
         discretion.

3. SECTION 8 OF THE PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING TO THE END
THEREOF:

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, purchases under the Plan shall be
         suspended effective February 28, 2003, such that the last purchase
         prior to such suspension shall be the purchase date occurring in March
         2003, until such time as the Company determines to reactivate the Plan
         in its sole discretion. Any funds accumulated under the Plan during
         such suspension not used to purchase Stock will be refunded to the
         appropriate participants.

                         [Next page is execution page.]

<PAGE>

4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PLAN. Except for the above amendments, all terms and
conditions of the Plan are unamended and shall remain in full force and effect.

                                     GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                     By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Washington, DC 20503

A Federal Crowdsourcing Campaign

Navigating Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Help Improve Federal 

Agency Forecasts of Procurement Opportunities

The Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Office of Management & Budget, Executive 

Office of the President, is hosting a three-week crowdsourcing campaign to seek feedback 

and preview changes under consideration for agency forecasts of procurement opportunities. 

Click HERE to participate in this campaign

All are welcome to participate. We are especially interested in private sector input, including 

feedback from current and prospective vendors, to understand: 

• How well do the changes that the Federal Government is considering for agency 

forecasts of procurement opportunities resonate with your business needs?

Participate in the campaign any time October 3 – 31, 2023 to share your feedback on the 

changes under consideration.

Your contributions will help shape plans and activities to ensure that Federal agency forecasts of 

procurement opportunities are strategic tools for business success. 

Thank you and we look forward to your feedback!

Christine Harada 

Senior Advisor

Office of Federal Procurement Policy 

Office of Management & Budget

Executive Office of the President
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT H. BROWN.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ZENOBILE v. McKECUEN

No. 361P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 104

Petition by defendant (Jeannie Young) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A-4for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/ JOHN C. GARRISON                         |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | John C. Garrison                             |
|               | *Principal Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|               |                                         |
| July 5,  2005 |                                         |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ICOP Digital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of Soapstone Networks Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Leighton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/    WILLIAM
LEIGHTONWilliam Leighton Chief Executive Officer April 29, 2009
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Holdings Financial Corporation (the Company), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                     |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                     |  | President and Director               
|                     | 
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                     |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934,  as  amended,  and  the  information  contained  in such report fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of
operations  of  the  Company.

This 21st day of March, 2006.


                                             /s/ John R. Perrill
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John R. Perrill
                                             Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)




                                             /s/ Carol J. Nelson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Carol J. Nelson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
      32.0





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT, CEO (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sandston Corporation
      (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel J. Dorman,
      as
      President, CEO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Daniel J. Dorman





Name:
            Daniel
                J. Dorman


Title:
            President,
                CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial
                Officer


Date:
            November
                13, 2006








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




Page
          13
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

December 9, 2019
General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the
Analytical Graphics, Inc. Reception December 13, 2019

On December 13, 2019, Analytical Graphics, Inc. (AGI), will host a reception at the Cosmos
Club in Washington, D.C. starting at 7:00 p.m. The event will provide an opportunity for
informal discussion on the challenges surrounding human spaceflight. AGI is in control of
the invitations, planning and organizing for the reception.

Approximately 400 people are expected to attend the reception. The estimated cost for the
reception, including all food and beverages, is approximately $180 per person. Attendees will
have a diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies,
representatives from the legislative branch of the government, academia, industry, media,
and members of the public. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA missions and programs. I find that this event meets the
requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend these
events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. Accordingly, NASA
employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of any of
the AGI may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to this
event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs
any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the
performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13770 may only attend the reception if they reimburse the
organizers the fair market value of the event. Additionally, NASA employees who have a
significant role in any pending matter affecting the interests of any of the organizers, such as
procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act
Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to
whether they may accept the invitation for this event.


You are also reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a), at which provides
that employees may accept gift items valued at no more than $20 per occasion (and no more
than $50 from one source in a calendar year). We understand AGI will be giving a hanging
Mistletoe bunch to all attendees. All NASA employees attending may accept the mistletoe
without reimbursing the sponsor.

ZAI”

Adam F. Greenstone
Exhibit 11



OURPETS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES



STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003



|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                   |  | 2004 |            |   | 2003 |  
|Income (loss) before extraordinary item                            |  | $    | 12,940     |   |      | $ | (407,980   | )
|Preferred Stock dividend requirements                              |  |      | 21,300     |   |      |   | 21,300     |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Loss before extraordinary item attributable to common stockholders |  | $    | (8,360     | ) |      | $ | (429,280   | )
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               |  |      | 11,712,306 |   |      |   | 11,202,580 |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Loss per common share before extraordinary item                    |  | $    |           |   |      | $ | (0.04      | )
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Extraordinary item                                                 |  | $    |           |   |      | $ | 848,166    |  
|Income per share from extraordinary item                           |  | $    |           |   |      | $ | 0.08       |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Net income                                                         |  | $    | 12,940     |   |      | $ | 440,186    |  
|Preferred Stock dividend requirements                              |  |      | 21,300     |   |      |   | 21,300     |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders              |  | $    | (8,360     | ) |      | $ | 418,886    |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Net income (loss) per common share                                 |  | $    |           |   |      | $ | 0.04       |  
|                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  



39