alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Phobos/Deimos Regolith Ion Sample 

Mission (PRISM): Determining Origins

Michael R. Collier1,2, Micah Schaible3, 

William M. Farrell1,2, David Folta1, Kyle M. Hughes1,

John W. Keller1,2, Ben Malphrus4, Aaron Zucherman4, 

Kevin Brown4, Amanda Holbrook4, Andrew S. Rivkin5,

Scott Murchie5, Dana Hurley2,5, Jasper Halekas2,6, Pamela Clark7, 

Richard Vondrak1,2, Timothy Stubbs1,2, Rosemary Killen1,2, Menelaos Sarantos1,2, 

Sarah L. Jones1, Jared Espley1, Gina Dibraccio1, Michael Choi1, and Michael Tsay8

1. NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD

2. SSERVI/DREAM2, Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 

3. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

4. Morehead State University, Morehead, KY

5. JHU/APL, Laurel, MD

6. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

7. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 

8. Busek Space Propulsion Systems, Natick, MA

Sampling the surface from above the surface without landing...

1 of 10
Sampling the surface from above the 

surface without landing...

2 of 10

Solar wind, energetic oxygen in the Martian

magnetotail, and micrometeorites bombard the

regolith continuously liberating material from

the surface in a process called sputtering.
What is the Origin of Phobos/Deimos?

3 of 10

adapted from the Rivkin SSERVI Phobos talk

Composition provides the key to determining their origins
Composition Measurements Using SIMS

• The space environment continually liberates material from

the regoliths of airless bodies throughout the solar system.

4 of 10

SIMS is a standard laboratory technique...

Schaible et al. (2017), JGR-Planets, 122, doi:10.1002/2017JE005359
PRISM Primary and Secondary Science

5 of 10
6 of 10
PRISM CubeSat Layout

• The fluxes of sputtered ions from Phobos at an altitude of around 27 km are about 10-1000/cm2/s. Based on scaling published effective areas down to CubeSat form factors, these fluxes imply that

between 0.01 and 1 counts per second per element will be observed. Even at a count rate as low as

0.01 Hz, this requires 106 s or a bit over ten days to accumulate sufficient counts in all species

shown in the figure, easily achievable over the mission lifetime. Some species will achieve the

necessary statistics in hours allowing compositional mapping of the surface and the red and blue

units. 7 of 10
PRISM Trajectory

• Can get to the Mars system in about three and one half

years and “orbit” the moons many hundreds of times.

8 of 10
CONOPS Overview

9 of 10
Conclusion

• Because using the space environment to obtain direct samples of

Phobos’ and Deimos’ composition to determine the origin of these

satellites using secondary ion mass spectrometry can be accomplished

with a single instrument, within a CubeSat form factor, on a relatively

small budget, and with current technology, a CubeSat SIMS mission to

Phobos and Deimos will provide the tremendous science return for

very little investment.

10 of 10

Special Thanks To: Pascal Lee, Edward Guiness, Michael Whalen, Roy E. Gladden,

Neil Chamberlain, Lauren McNally, Jacob Englander, Al Banjhi, Les Deutch, Jay

Friedlander, John Ratliff, and Bob Johnson.
PRISM Resources

11 of 10
PRISM Budget

12 of 10
PRISM Communication Scenarios

13 of 10
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Christopher C. JureyChristopher C. Jurey,Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 12, 2008
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

# A RIZONA 

# C OURT OF 

# A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JO S E JESUS ROMAN JR. , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 0195 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013

- 430684

- 001 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rueter , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Robert E. Prather Counsel for Respondent
Jose Jesus Roman Jr. , Kingman Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge James B. Morse Jr., Judge Cynthia J. Bailey , and Judge Brian Y Furuya delivered the decision of the Court

. FILED 12-12-2023STATE v. ROMAN Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Jose Jesus Roman Jr. seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is his fifth petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction, petition for review , response, and reply. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 13, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David E. Pertl, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

July 28, 2004

| | /s/ David E. PertlDavid E. Pertl
Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A  signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been  provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51228

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO LUNA-MADRID, also known as Ramiro M. Martinez, also known

as Juan Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-594-ALL-DB

 

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gilberto Luna-Madrid appeals his conviction based on his

guilty plea for illegal reentry following deportation. He asserts

that the district court coerced him into pleading guilty and denied

him his right to counsel and to a jury trial by denying his request

for substitution of counsel.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Luna’s request, particularly given the late
1 See United States v. Ramos, 71 F.3d 1150, 1155-56 (5th Cir. 1995);

United States v. Silva, 611 F.2d 78, 79 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam).

2 Cf. United States v. Lampazianie, 251 F.3d 519, 524 (5th Cir. 2001).

2

stage of the proceedings.1 Contrary to Luna’s contentions, the

district court did not require him to plead guilty or forbid him

from proceeding to a trial by jury. Luna has failed to show that

he was coerced to plead guilty by the actions of the district

court.2

AFFIRMED.
#### Wm. Campbell *v.*White’s Admr.

Actions — Real Party in Interest.

1. By section 30 of the Civil Code every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.

Same — Wills — Executor as Legatee.

2. When the executor is the legatee he is the real party in interest in an action on a note given to the testator.

APPEAL EROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 6, 1866.

'Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

Campbell made his note to Durrett White, due November 11, 1858. Durrett White died in the year 1861, having published his will, which was admitted to record November 4, 1861, and the same day W. II. White qualified as executor.

W. H. White died early in the year 1865 and George Denny administered on his estate April 3, 1865.

Durrett White devised all his estate, after the payment of his just debts, to said W. H. White, save two specific legacies of $5,000 each.

Denny, the administrator, found this note on Campbell among his decedent’s papers, brought suit in his capacity of administrator, and avers the above facts, and files as part of his pleadings *408the will of the testator and the letters testamentary and of administration. Defendant, Campbell, demurred to the petition because no representative of Durrett White, the payee in the note, is party, either as plaintiff or defendant; this demurrer was overruled and judgment rendered for plaintiff, and this appeal is prosecuted to reverse it.

By section 30, Chvil Code, “every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” This court has uniformly held since the adoption of the Code that the beneficiary was. *an essential party,*and that the holder of the legal title was a proper party, either plaintiff or defendant. By the common-law rules only the party Avhose legal rights Avere violated could be a plaintiff, and if the beneficiary was at all mentioned it Avas merely to state that the suit Avas prosecuted for his benefit, not that he should be a party; this rule has been altered by the Code, and the real party in interest *must be plaintiff.*

At common law the bequest of a specific chattel did not vest the title in the legatee until the executor assented.

In this case W. H. White was both the legatee and executor; he had the note after qualifying as executor for more than three years; these facts seem to raise the presumption that he had taken the note to himself as his personal property, and that having settled the debts and specific legacies of his testator, that no further administration was necessary on Durrett White’s estate, and as he was the real party in interest it may now be presumed he was also vested with the legal title, and that the suit was properly prosecuted by his administrator.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2923

_____________________________
M AXINE L AKESHA D AVIS

- E AKINS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

August 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Megan Lynne Long , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

The Board of Directors

 

Sify Technologies Limited

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statement (No. 333-165248) on Form S-8 of Sify Technologies Limited and its subsidiaries (the ‘Company’)of our report dated July 27, 2020 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Sify Technologies Limitedas of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equityand cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2020, March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of March 31, 2020, which report appear in the March 31, 2020 annual report on Form 20-F ofSify Technologies Limited.

 

**ASA & Associates LLP**

**Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

Chennai, India

July 27, 2020
#### Eleanor L. Simms, Appellant, v APA Truck Leasing Corporation et al., Respondents.

[788 NYS2d 63]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry L. Crispino, J.), entered August 5, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In opposition to defendants’ prima facie showing of no “serious injury” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), plaintiff submitted the report of his examining physician which, while denominated an affirmation, is neither affirmed nor sworn to (CPLR 2106; *Grasso v Angerami,*79 NY2d 813 [1991]; *Charlton v Almaraz,*278 AD2d 145 [2000]). Thus, the court properly refused to consider the unsworn report. Plaintiff’s attempt to submit a corrected affirmation for the first time on appeal to this Court is improper and we decline to consider it. In any event, the measurements of loss of range of motion described therein are not shown to be causally connected to the accident in which *323plaintiff allegedly sustained the loss *(Chrisomalides v Ekow,*291 AD2d 202 [2002]), nor does the affirmation address defendants’ radiologist’s findings attributing plaintiffs spinal condition to a preexisting degenerative condition *(Shinn v Catanzaro,*1 AD3d 195 [2003]), or how that condition may have impacted on his diagnosis *(Shaw v Looking Glass Assoc.,*8 AD3d 100 [2004]). Additional diagnostic statements in plaintiff’s physician’s report were conclusory and tailored to meet statutory requirements *(Hernandez v Lopez,*9 AD3d 300 [2004]). Plaintiffs radiologist’s report is also insufficient since the mere existence of a herniated disc does not per se constitute serious injury *(Noble v Ackerman,*252 AD2d 392, 394 [1998]), and plaintiff failed to offer any objective evidence, as is required, of the extent or degree of her alleged physical limitations and their duration, resulting from the disc injury *(Arjona v Calcano,*7 AD3d 279 [2004]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.
TOP

20

NASA

PRIME

CONTRACTORS

FY 2023

VENDOR NAME AND WEBSITE TOTAL DOLLARS

California Institute of Technology (JPL) https://acquisitions.jpl.nasa.gov $2,922,677,243 

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. https://www.spacex.com/supplier/index.html $2,250,758,731

The Boeing Company http://www.boeingsuppliers.com/esd/getstart.html $1,568,498,599 

Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. 

(Includes Orbital Sciences and ATK)

 https://www.northropgrumman.com/suppliers/ $1,251,623,011 

Lockheed Martin Corporation https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers.html $1,221,943,785 

Jacobs Technology, Inc. https://www.jacobs.com/suppliers/ $946,316,790 

KBR Wyle Services, Inc. https://kbrsupplier.com/ $722,587,900 

Johns Hopkins University Applied 

Physics Laboratory LLC

https://hopkinsmedicine.org/business/index.html $449,100,521 

Blue Origin LLC https://www.blueorigin.com/fly-with-us/become-a-supplier $440,849,404 

Science Applications International Corporation https://www.saic.com/who-we-are/suppliers-and-smallbusiness

$426,436,260 

Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc. https://www.rocket.com/suppliernet $418,618,993 

Leidos https://www.leidos.com/suppliers $359,353,430 

Peraton, Inc. https://www.peraton.com/suppliers/ $337,355,934 

Bechtel National, Inc. https://www.bechtel.com/suppliers/ $308,679,000 

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (Includes 

Aerodyne-SGT Engineering Services LLC)

https://www.l3harris.com/supply-chain $285,184,931 

Science Systems and Applications, Inc. https://www.ssaihq.com/contact-us $241,109,133 

Maxar Space, LLC https://www.maxar.com/legal/suppliers $178,315,215 

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. https://www.airproducts.com/company/suppliers $172,185,991 

Syncom Space Services Llc http://www.syncomspaceservices.com/ $146,326,084 

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. https://www.ball.com/aerospace/about-aerospace/supplierresources

$129,931,562 

TOTAL $14,777,852,516
EXHIBIT 11.1

                    COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Six Months Ended                Three Months Ended
                                                          March 31,                         March 31,
                                                   1997            1996              1997             1996
                                               -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>        
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                            13,234,930       11,341,864       13,579,433       11,391,780
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
    Stock Options                                  551,409          477,048          549,587          482,182
    Warrants                                          --             42,320             --             39,326
    Preferred Stock                                   --          1,000,000             --          1,000,000
                                               -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding             13,786,339       12,861,232       14,129,020       12,913,288
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Net Income                                     $ 4,005,165      $ 2,017,672      $ 2,437,032      $ 1,139,897
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Primary Earnings Per Share                     $      0.29      $      0.16      $      0.17      $      0.09
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
     All share amounts and per share data have been restated to reflect the
     two-for-one stock split effected as a stock dividend on May 28, 1996.
                                       16
EXHIBIT 32.2



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John R. Detwiler, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





|Date: September 12, 2003                
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/    JOHN R. DETWILER                 
|                                        
|John R. Detwiler Chief Financial
Officer
SSBD

• SSBD is short for Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration airplane.

• The airplane proved you could make a sonic boom less noisy by changing its shape.

• It completed about 30 test flights between 2003 and 2004.

Want to learn more about the SSBD? Go to: https://www.nasa.gov/aero/sonic_boom_takes_shape.html

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Secretary of Labor signed the annual certifications under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. 3301*et seq*., thereby enabling employers who make contributions to state unemployment funds to obtain certain credits against their liability for the federal unemployment tax. By letter, the certifications were transmitted to the Secretary of the Treasury. The letter and certifications are printed below.                    

      ( print page 68002)    
Signed in Washington, DC, on November 1, 2010.

Jane Oates,

Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.

      ( print page 68003)          ( print page 68004)          ( print page 68005)          ( print page 68006)    

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P

[FR Doc. 2010-27899 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-C