alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                              42,914
<SECURITIES>                                        99,195
<RECEIVABLES>                                      102,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,356
<INVENTORY>                                         46,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   240,767
<PP&E>                                             114,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                      70,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     376,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               69,099
<BONDS>                                             97,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                23
<OTHER-SE>                                         209,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       376,536
<SALES>                                            101,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   101,768
<CGS>                                               43,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       43,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 16,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        16,862
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.71



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,
Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  1.       the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
         ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual Report") of CryptoLogic Inc. (the
         "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
         or 78o(d)), and

                  2.       the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ James Ryan
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     James Ryan
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 13, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14143 and #14144]


Arizona Disaster #AZ-00039

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Arizona dated 10/02/2014.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/08/2014.
    Effective Date: 10/02/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/01/2014.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/02/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Maricopa.
    Contiguous Counties:
    Arizona; Gila; La Paz; Pima; Pinal; Yavapai; Yuma.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14143 6 
and for economic injury is 14144 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Arizona.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: October 2, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-24195 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PETER FOSTER.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration ~ Administrator A 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey (Acting) 

Associate Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey 

Michael I. Mott 

Chief Engineer 

Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Information Officer 

Ronald S. West 

Chief Scientist 

France A. Cordova 

Assoc. Dep. Administrator (Tech) 

$ 

f' 

op 

Inspector General W 

Robena L. Gross 

Lu 

1.-..--.."II~l~~

Deidre A. Lee Laurie Boeder Alan M. Ladwia 

Aerospace Safety 1 Advisory Panel I 

Facilities Assurance Operations 

Benita A. CooDer Frederick Greqow Michael D. Christensen 

w 

! 

Y M 

Mission to Planet Space Flight 

Earth 

R S 

Aeronautics Space Science 

and Education 

Jeff Lawrence Spence M. Armstrong 

Officer C ou nse I Relations hairs 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Ffankle George E. Reese (Acting) John D. Schurnacher 

Charles F. Kennel Wil Trafton (Acting) Robert Whitehead Wes T. Huntress 

as of March 1996 

'JPL is a contractor-operated lacility.
#### Meyer, Appellant, *v.*Daniel, Appellee.

(No. 6617

Decided December 14, 1945.)

*Messrs. Kruslmg & Krusling,*for -appellant.

*Mr. Robert F. Dreidame,*for appellee.

Boss, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal from the *52order of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county, on the ground that no final order was entered in that court is here considered.

In the trial court, shortly after a reply was filed and before the case stood for trial, a motion for judgment on the pleadings wag filed by the plaintiff. That motion was overruled. Thereafter, the court *sua sponte*struck certain matters from the plaintiff’s re-' ply and granted plaintiff’s motion to strike from the files the defendant’s motion to strike from the reply.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike from the files defendant’s motion to strike from the reply was filed after plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

This court has consistently held that the action of a trial court in overruling a motion for judgment on the pleadings lacks the finality required to give such action the qualifications of a judgment constituting such action a predicate for appeal to this court. *J. & F. Harig Co.*v. *City of Cincinnati,*61 Ohio App., 314, 22 N. E. (2d), 540. The petition in the instant action was filed on March 9, 1945. There is nothing in the changes either in the Constitution or statutes which, in our opinion, requires a different conclusion.

We, however, find our judgment in conflict with that reached by the Court of Appeals for Mahoning county, in *Marietta*v. *Nichol,*72 Ohio App., 387, 52 N. E. (2d), 647, and for this reason,, the case will be certified to the Supreme Court. •

Entries may be presented accordingly, to wit, dis- * missing the appeal and certification of this cause to the Supreme Court.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Hildebrant, P. J., Matthews and Ross, JJ., concur.
#### J. SEWARD JOHNSON v. TOWNSHIP OF PRINCETON.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**HMN FINANCIAL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jon Eberle, Senior Vice President and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 12, 2004 | /s/ Jon Eberle                                 |   |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                 | Jon Eberle,                                    |   |
|                 | Senior Vice  President/Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                 | (Principal  Financial Officer)                 |   |

 

----
#### E. A. Hensley *v.*J. G. Trimble.

Bill of Exchange — Set-off and Counterclaim — Purchaser for Value of Bill of Exchange.

A set-off or conterclaim existing between the original parties to a Bill of Exchange cannot be adjudged against an assignee, after the Bill has gone into circulation, in the regular course of business, for a valuable consideration.

Pleading — Demurrer—Issue Joined — Objections.

Though a petition may be defective because of insufficient averments as to the principal causes of action stated, to be availed of a demurrer thereto must be put in before issue joined by defendant answering setting up by way of defense, set-offs and counter-claims. And it is too late to object to the validity of the petition for the first time, before the Appelate Court.

APPEAL EROM WOLEE CIRCUIT COURT.

February 1, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams :

The writings sued on, though styled and treated by both parties as notes are really foreign bills of exchange drawn at Oincinnati, Ohio, payable at Mt. Sterling, Kentucky, and which had been assigned to appellee. The petition does not aver protest and notice either for non-acceptance or non-payment, nor does it aver any excuse, as that the drawer had no funds with or authority from the drawer to draw upon him, and would therefore have been liable to a general demurrer.

But appellant answered setting up defenses by way of set-off and counter-claim and issues thereon formed and submitted to the court and adjudged by it for $1,025.25, with interest from May 19, 1866, in appellee’s favor.

There is no bill of exceptions containing the evidence, therefore, we must regard the defenses unsustained save so far only as not denied and treating the loaned buggy as not returned and worth the $J5 as alleged, still the judgment does not amount to more, nor indeed as much as the court might have adjudged.

Even if it be conceded that under these issues off-sets and *214counter-claims existing between the original parties could be adjudged against *the*assignee, wbicb cannot be done as to bills of exchange which have gone into circulation in regular course of business for a valuable consideration, still there is nothing in this case which authorized this court to reverse on this account. But it is insisted that no cause of action appears in the petition and that therefore the judgment should be -reversed. However defective the petition might be, because of no sufficient averment as to no funds or authority to draw, yet after issue waiving this and judgment establishing a claim, especially where no demurrer for either party was put in so as to illicit the judgment of the court below on the pleadings it is too late to object for the first time in this Court, no motion for a new trial being made'below.

*Simpson, Hazelrigg*& *Winn, for appellant.*

*Elliott, for appellee.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Ahlbrandt, Appellee.

(No. 6672

Decided May 20, 1946.)

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*director of law, and *Mr. Robert J. Paul,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Ragland, Dixon & Murphy,*for appellee.

By the Court.

This case is before this court on motion to dismiss the appeal of the state from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas reversing a conviction on a charge of drunken driving, originating in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati.

It is admitted the notice of appeal was filed twenty-two days after the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, and it is claimed that by virtue of Section 12223-7, G-eneral Code, the notice of appeal was not filed within time and this court has no jurisdiction to hear the ease.

The sole question for decision here is whether the *124above section of the Code governs the time of filing the notice of appeal.

The above section occurs in the General Code in Title V, “Procedure on Appeal,” and is a part of the Appellate Procedure Act, which took the place of Titles V and VI of the former Code of Civil Procedure, and is, therefore, confined in its application to civil cases.

Appeals in criminal cases are governed by a separate chapter of the General Code in Title II, “Criminal Procedure,” Chapter 38, “Appeals.”

The motion to dismiss is, therefore, overruled.

*Motion overruled.*

Hildebrant, P. J., Matthews and Boss, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 231 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 139
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 231

                          [Report No. 108-70]

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2003

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

                             June 13, 2003

                Reported by Mr. Gregg, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Automatic Defibrillation in Adam's 
Memory Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    Subsection (c) of section 312 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 244), as amended by Public Law 107-188, is amended--
            (1) at the end of paragraph (5), by striking ``and'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
            ``(6) establish an information clearinghouse that provides 
        information to increase public access to defibrillation in 
        schools; and''.

                                                       Calendar No. 139

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 231

                          [Report No. 108-70]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 13, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2285 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2285

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real 
                    property to Beaver County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall, without consideration 
and subject to valid existing rights, convey to Beaver County, Utah 
(referred to in this Act as the ``County''), all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the approximately 200 acres 
depicted as ``Minersville State Park'' on the map entitled ``S. 2285, 
Minersville State Park'' and dated April 30, 2004, for use for public 
recreation.
    (b) Reconveyance by Beaver County.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), Beaver 
        County may sell, for not less than fair market value, a portion 
        of the property conveyed to the County under this section, if 
        the proceeds of such sale are used by the County solely for 
        maintenance of public recreation facilities located on the 
        remainder of the property conveyed to the County under this 
        section.
            (2) Limitation.--If the County does not comply with the 
        requirements of paragraph (1) in the conveyance of the property 
        under that paragraph--
                    (A) the County shall pay to the United States the 
                proceeds of the conveyance; and
                    (B) the Secretary of the Interior may require that 
                all property conveyed under subsection (a) (other than 
                the property sold by the County under paragraph (1)) 
                revert to the United States.

            Passed the Senate September 15, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2285

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real 
                    property to Beaver County, Utah.
```
#### MARY LUCILLE CARBERRY v. PAUL J. CARBERRY, JR.

July 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/Afor the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/ JOHN C. GARRISON                         |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | John C. Garrison                             |
|               | *Principal Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|               |                                         |
| June 9,  2005 |                                         |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ICOP Digital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Ranhoff, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: March 10, 2005



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ DAVID A. RANHOFF                           
|David A. Ranhoff                               
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
‘National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Connecting Small Businesses
With Industry and Govemment

to Infuse and Commercialize

Technologies

www rasa gov

Mark your calendar

Space Communications and
Navigation (SCaN) - SBIR
Commerclalzation Workshop

Workshop Features:

» Learn about projected
SCaN technology needs
and applications
Meet one-on-one with
industry and government .

+ Develop Partnerships

This workshop ‘will provide the
unique opportunity to identity
potential areas of collaboration

* with prime contractors,
advanced technology firms, and.
NASA technology managers.

Details to follow. For more
information please contact
Afroz. J. Zaman@nasa gov.

wowstirnasegaw