alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

 108th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                S. 2190

 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2004

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Life at Conception Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE.

     To implement equal protection for the right to life of each born 
and preborn human person, and pursuant to the duty and authority of the 
Congress, including Congress' power under article I, section 8, to make 
necessary and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 
14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the 
Congress hereby declares that the right to life guaranteed by the 
Constitution is vested in each human being.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Human person; human being.--The terms ``human person'' 
        and ``human being'' include each and every member of the 
        species homo sapiens at all stages of life, including, but not 
        limited to, the moment of fertilization, cloning, and other 
        moment at which an individual member of the human species comes 
        into being.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' used in the 14th article of 
        amendment to the Constitution of the United States and other 
        applicable provisions of the Constitution includes the District 
        of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other 
        territory or possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### JOHN R. FIORINO v. JANE G. CLAYTON, CLERK OF MONMOUTH COUNTY.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2385 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2385

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2004

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANTIAGO E. CAMPOS UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Santiago E. Campos 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Santiago E. 
Campos United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate July 19, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE
15D-14(A)

PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, William D. Young, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monogram Biosciences, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009                    
|                                        
|/S/    WILLIAM D.
YOUNG                 
|William D. Young Chief Executive Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2362 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2004 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

AN ACT 

To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical 

Observatory instrumentation support control building 

and associated site development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, 

and for other purposes. 
2 

S 2362 RFH 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY 

4 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPORT FACILITY. 

5 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

6 is authorized to develop the site for a Smithsonian Astro7 physical Observatory instrumentation support control 

8 building, including the installation of necessary utilities 

9 and equipment housings, and to construct such building 

10 on the site, for the purpose of supporting the collaborative 

11 Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array Sys12 tem (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Ari13 zona. 

14 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

15 There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

16 this Act $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2005. 

Passed the Senate June 14, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition for disciplinary action,

wherein Respondent agreed that his conduct, as described in the District of Columbia 

Court of Appeals’ June 13, 2024 opinion and order, violated Rules 1.4(a), 1.16(d), 

5.1(b), and 5.1(c)(2) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct, it is

this 25th day of September 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the joint petition for reciprocal action is granted. Pursuant 

to Rule 19-737(f), corresponding discipline is imposed and John P. Mahoney is 

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for 60 days, stayed as 

to all but 30 days, effective nunc pro tunc to July 13, 2024, followed by one year of 

probation with the condition that Respondent comply with the probation terms set 

forth by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in In re John P. Mahoney, 24-

BG-0466.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

 Chief Justice

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

JOHN P. MAHONEY

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 AG Docket No. 11

 September Term, 2024
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

www.nasa.gov | #Artemis 

NP-2021-03-2934-HQ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

J. C. Durr, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03432-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8695 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Rivera at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3337.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Linda Rivera. For more information please contact: Ms. Rivera at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3337, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 1509- National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input is welcomed.

Dated: October 7, 2014.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-24414 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 10.1.17
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(Employee Participant  Effective for Grants Made After May 1, 2008)
 Company
 WITNESSETH THAT
 Plan Committee
  Terms of Award
 Participant
 Grant Date
 Covered Shares
 Exercise Price
  Award and Exercise Price Option Incentive Stock Option
 Date of Exercise
 (a)
    
    The Option shall become exercisable (shall vest) with respect to:




---



##### 



Original Vesting Schedule
 Remaining Covered Shares New Vesting Schedule
 th
 th




---



##### 



Restatement Excess Payment




---



##### 



Expiration Expiration Date earliest
       Method of Option Exercise




---



##### 



Withholding
 Transferability Immediate Family
 Non-Competition; Non-Solicitation
 Consideration for this Section.




---



##### 



Restricted Activity




---



##### 



Remedies
 Definitions




---



##### 



Adjusted EBITDA
 Cause successor company
 Complying Assumption
 Date of Termination
 Disability




---



##### 



EBITDA Target A
 EBITDA Target B
 EBITDA Target C
 EBITDA Target D
 EBITDA Target E
 Good Reason
 Heirs and Successors




---



##### 



Administration
 Plan Definitions
 Amendment
   ParticipantName:Dated:Harris Interactive Inc.By:Its:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,716
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         129,039
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                39,933
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    367,819
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,097,815
<ALLOWANCE>                                     20,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,725,660
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,505,747
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             56,663
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,725,660
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 56,345
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,466
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 8,796
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                74,607
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              41,655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,273
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,334
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,250
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,450
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                     32,991
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,851
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,411
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,977
<RECOVERIES>                                        43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,227
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,356
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             10,871
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         20,227


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Arezu Sarvestani","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/asarvest\/","title":"2023 in Review: Highlights from NASA in Silicon Valley","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"L6IUagpVFT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/2023-nasa-silicon-valley\/\">2023 in Review: Highlights from NASA in Silicon Valley<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/2023-nasa-silicon-valley\/embed\/#?secret=L6IUagpVFT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2023 in Review: Highlights from NASA in Silicon Valley” — NASA\" data-secret=\"L6IUagpVFT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/jsc2023e039644.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### LAWRENCE E. MCHUGH v. HACKENSACK PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### GEORGE HARMS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. NJ TRANSIT.

April 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, (the ”Report”), I, William P. Hales, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ William P. Hales


William P. Hales


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)














August 16, 2010





























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Rust and Another *v.*Smith.

If a plea professing to answer the whole cause of action admit any part of-the demand to be due, it is bad. ' . •.

*Thursday, July*2.

ERROR to the *Jackson*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

Assumpsit by the assignees of a-promissory note against the maker. Plea to the whole cause of action, that the note was given for a part of the price of real estate sold by the payee of the note to the defendant below; that the payee assigned to the defendant a title-bond for the land, which he held on a third person, conditioned for the conveyance of the same to the payee; that neither the third person, nor the assignor of the bond, ever had any title to the land, and that they could not, nor could either of them, conveya title to the same; wherefore the consideration of the note had wholly failed. The plea, however, in stating the particulars of the transaction, shows that a small portion of the consideration, to wit, 4 dollars and 23 cents,- was a matter not connected with the sale of the land. The -plaintiff demurred generally; the demurrer was overruled; and'final judgment rendered .for the defendant.

This judgment is erroneous. The plea professes to -answer the whole cause of action, and alleges a total failure of the consideration of the note, when, in fact, it admits á'small sum to be due. The demurrer should have been sustained for that cause. Correct pleading would have admitted a cause of action for the amount of that portion of the consideration of the note, which did not grow out of the purchase of .the land, and set up the want of title against the residue of the note.

*353
      *J. G. Marshall*and *R. W. Thompson,*for the plaintiffs.

*JS. P. Thornton,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the joinder in demurrer set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10M

                   EXTENSION OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

     The Extension of Property Management Agreement entered into this 15th day
     of December, 1999 by and between Murray Income Properties II, Ltd., a Texas
     limited partnership (hereinafter called the "Owner") and Brookside
     Properties, Inc., (hereinafter called the "Agent").

                                    RECITALS:

1.        Owner and Agent are parties to that certain Property Management
          Agreement dated March 1, 1991 covering the Paddock Place Shopping
          Center, located at the Southwest corner of White Bridge Road and
          Brookwood Terrace, Nashville, Tennessee.

2.        The term of the aforesaid Property Management Agreement expired on
          February 28, 1994, was extended with an expiration date of February
          28, 1995, was extended with an expiration date of February 29, 1996,
          was extended with an expiration date of February 28, 1997, was
          extended with an expiration date of February 28, 1998, was extended
          with an expiration date of December 31, 1998, and was extended with an
          expiration date of December 31, 1999. The parties thereto are mutually
          desirous of extending the term of the Property Management Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:

1.        The expiration date of the Property Management Agreement shall be
          midnight, December 31, 2000

2.        All other terms and conditions of the Property Management Agreement
          shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this document the day and
year first above written.

WITNESS                             BROOKSIDE PROPERTIES, INC.

   /s/ Charles H. Warfield, Jr.     /s/ W. Miles Warfield
-------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Charles H. Warfield, Jr.            W. Miles Warfield

                                    MURRAY INCOME PROPERTIES II, LTD
                                    a Texas Limited Partnership by
                                    Murray Realty Investors IX, Inc. a
                                    Texas Corporation, its General Partners
                                     (Owners)


                                    /s/ Brent Buck
-------------------------------     -------------------------------------
                                    By: Brent Buck, Executive Vice President