alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FISHER v. FISHER

No. 551P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 715

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Mary Nickerson, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[790 NYS2d 241]

Rose, J. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 31, 2004, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had no covered base period employment.

Claimant had been employed by an airline as a customer ser*981vice representative when she took an indefinite, unpaid leave of absence in 2000 to serve full time as the president of Local 1171 of the Communications Workers of America, a union comprised of employees of the airline. In 2003, claimant lost her bid for reelection and, upon being informed by the airline that she could not return to her previous employment as a ticket sales agent because the center where she had worked had been eliminated due to a reduction in force, applied for and received unemployment insurance benefits based upon her reported base period wages paid by the union. After these benefits were exhausted, claimant applied for additional unemployment insurance benefits available to airline-related industry workers under the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (hereinafter TEUC-A; *see*Pub L 108-11, 117 US Stat 607). Her application was denied, however, on the ground that her base period employment with the union involved providing services to airline employees rather than to an airline, and her subsequent separation from that employment when she was voted out of office did not qualify her for benefits within the meaning of TEUC-A. Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge upheld the denial of benefits, which the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently affirmed. Claimant now appeals and we affirm.

To be eligible for extended unemployment insurance benefits under TEUC-A, a claimant must demonstrate a qualifying base period of employment, which the statute defines as employment with an air carrier, a facility at an airport or an upstream producer or supplier for an air carrier *(see*Pub L 108-11, 117 US Stat 607, § 4002 [a] [2] [A]). Additionally, the claimant’s separation from such employment must be due to reductions in service by the air carrier as the result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 or the present conflict in Iraq *(see*Pub L 108-11, 117 US Stat 607, § 4002 [a] [2] [B]). In the instant matter, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that claimant’s role as president of her local union chapter did not suffice to bring her within the purview of the statute. Specifically, the Board was entitled to rely on hearing testimony, including claimant’s admissions and documentary evidence indicating that claimant, whose salary was paid by the union, neither provided services directly to the airline nor left her position with the union for any reason other than her lost bid for reelection *(see Matter of Local 54 United Paperworkers Intl. Union [Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 922, 923 [2003]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2023

No. 04-22-00597-CR

EX PARTE Valentin HERNANDEZ CORDOVA

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10538CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 24, 2023, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of 

time to file appellant’s reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due no 

later than March 1, 2023. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDERED February 1, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly
  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained
  in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                              

|                   |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 | /s/ Bernard P. Aldrich 
|                   |                        
|                   | President and Chief    
|                   | Executive Officer      
|                  
|Date: May 10, 2007 | /s/ Robert M. Wolf     
|                   |                        
|                   | Chief Financial Officer

---
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2249

AN ACT

To amend the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance

Act to provide for emergency food and shelter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Food and

5 Shelter Act of 2004’’.
 †

2

S 2249 ES

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

3 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as

4 follows:

5 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

7 this title $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $170,000,000

8 for fiscal year 2006, and $180,000,000 for fiscal year

9 2007.’’.

10 SEC. 3. NAME CHANGE TO NOMINATING ORGANIZATION.

11 Section 301(b) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

12 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331(b)) is amended by strik13 ing paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

14 ‘‘(5) United Jewish Communities.’’.

15 SEC. 4. PARTICIPATION OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS ON

16 LOCAL BOARDS.

17 Section 316(a) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

18 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11346(a)) is amended by strik19 ing paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

20 ‘‘(6) guidelines requiring each local board to in21 clude in their membership not less than 1 homeless

22 individual, former homeless individual, homeless ad23 vocate, or recipient of food or shelter services, except

24 that such guidelines may waive the requirement of

25 this paragraph for any board that is unable to meet

26 such requirement if the board otherwise consults
†

3

S 2249 ES

1 with homeless individuals, former homeless individ2 uals, homeless advocates, or recipients of food or

3 shelter services.’’.

Passed the Senate July 21, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2249

AN ACT

To amend the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Asshelter. sistance Act to provide for emergency food and
(b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4)
(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)
(b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4) (b)(4)

(b)(4)
(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)

(b)(4)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 10-Q/A

                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                  FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION, 12, 13 OR 15(D) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




                         CarrAmerica Realty Corporation
                       (formerly Carr Realty Corporation)
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                                 Amendment No. 1

     The undersigned  registrant hereby amends Item 6(a) of its Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1996 filed with the  Commission  on
August 14, 1996 as set forth in the pages attached  hereto to file Exhibit 27 --
Financial Data Schedule.

Date:    October 16, 1996


                                            CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION


                                            By: /s/ Brian K. Fields
                                                -------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>





ITEM 6.           Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

                  (a) CarrAmerica  Realty Corporation hereby amends Item 6(a) of
its  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  1996  filed with the
Commission on August 14, 1996 as set forth in the pages attached  hereto to file
Exhibit 27 -- Financial Data Schedule.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I delegate to the Director, Division of 
Unaccompanied Children's Services (DUCS), the DUCS Supervisory Program 
Specialist, DUCS Federal Field Specialists and DUCS Case Managers, the 
following authority delegated to the Director, Office of Refugee 
Resettlement (ORR), on April 1, 2009, by the Assistant Secretary for 
Children and Families under section 235 of the William Wilberforce 
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law 
110-457:

(a) Authority Delegated

    1. Authority under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims 
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, section 235(c)(2), to place an 
unaccompanied alien child in the least restrictive setting that is in 
the best interest of the child.
    2. Authority under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims 
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, section 235(c)(3)(A) to place 
an unaccompanied alien child with a custodian upon determining that the 
proposed custodian is capable of providing for the child's physical and 
mental well-being. Such determination shall, at a minimum, include 
verification of the custodian's identity and relationship to the child 
and an independent finding that the custodian has not engaged in any 
activity that would pose a potential risk to the child.

(b) Limitations

    1. This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's 
existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations.
    2. This delegation shall be exercised under financial and 
administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for 
Children and Families authorities.
    3. This delegation shall apply only to placement decisions made for 
unaccompanied Haitian children in the custody of ORR as a result of the 
January 12, 2010 earthquake in Haiti.

(c) Effective Date

    This delegation of authority is effective on date of signature.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Director of the 
Division of Unaccompanied Children's Services, the DUCS Supervisory 
Program Specialist, DUCS Federal Field Specialists and DUCS Case 
Managers which, in effect, involved the exercise of these authorities 
prior to the effective date of this delegation.

    Dated: February 2, 2010.
Eskinder Negash,
Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. 2010-2785 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         901,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,821,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                    49,660
<INVENTORY>                                  4,805,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,240,270
<PP&E>                                       4,787,813
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,533,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,977,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,739,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,519
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,165,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,977,407
<SALES>                                      2,740,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,740,997
<CGS>                                        1,531,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,531,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,179,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.004
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Coleman J. Clougherty, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                          |        |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ COLEMAN J. CLOUGHERTY                                |   |
|                                                     |   |
| Coleman J. Clougherty                                    |   |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer |   |
| August 14, 2003                                          |   |

28
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136206 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. DEBORAH STEVENS, TONY DECK, Stephen J. Markman, BEVERLY HENKEL, VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ, Justices 

BARRY KELLEY, RUSSELL SOLES, DENISE 

SOLES, DORIS WALKER, and ELIZABETH 

CLINE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 136206 

 COA: 272329 

Genesee CC: 00-069124-NZ 

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

423 KA 08-01012
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VICTOR E. SANTIAGO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R. Schwartz, A.J.), rendered February 7, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree and possession of burglar’s tools.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and possession of burglar’s tools (§ 140.35), defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to suppress the victim’s showup identification of him. Defendant contended following the suppression hearing that the showup procedure was “inherently suggestive” because the victim was “a young man who was shown no one else moments after an event.” Thus, defendant failed to preserve for our review his present contentions that the showup procedure was unreasonable under the circumstances, that it was unduly suggestive because the 13-year-old identifying victim observed defendant exiting a police car in handcuffs, and defendant was in the presence of a police officer during the showup procedure ( see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Morgan , 302 AD2d 983, 984, lv denied 99 NY2d 631). In any event, we conclude that defendant’s present contentions lack merit. The showup procedure was reasonable under the circumstances because it was conducted in “geographic and temporal proximity to the crime” ( People v Brisco , 99 NY2d 596, 597; see People v Kirkland , 49 AD3d 1260, 1260-1261, lv denied 10 NY3d 958, 961, cert denied ___ US ___, 129 S Ct 1331; People v Davis , 48 AD3d 1120, 1122, lv denied 10 NY3d 957). Further, the showup procedure was not rendered unduly suggestive by the victim’s observation of defendant exiting a police car in handcuffs or by the fact that defendant was in the presence of a police officer during the procedure ( see Davis , 48 AD3d at 1122; see also People v Grant , 77-2- 423 KA 08-01012

AD3d 558). Finally, it cannot be said that the identifying victim’s young age rendered the showup procedure unduly suggestive ( see generally People v Smith , 236 AD2d 639, 640, lv denied 90 NY2d 863).

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-728
In Re: CARRINGTON LAMONT HARRELL, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-90-27-G, CA-97-263) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carrington Lamont Harrell, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Carrington Lamont Harrell brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to rule on his objections to the report of a magistrate judge. The district court ruled on the objections and adopted and affirmed the report by order dated October 29, 1997. Accor dingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not s ignificantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTEDED FROM FRESH
CHOICE, INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 11, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-11-2000
<CASH>                                           2,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,849
<PP&E>                                          46,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,123)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,343
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,413
<SALES>                                         35,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,311
<CGS>                                            8,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    824
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       802
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>