alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 23
- 00177
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.F. AND J.M., CHILDREN

From the County Court at Law Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. F2118586A

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant sought to appeal the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights in a private termination proceeding in wh ich the Department of Family and
Protective Services was not involved. The trial court’s Order of Termination was signed on May 16, 2023. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due on June 5, 2023. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a)(1) (“Appeals in parental termination...cases are governed by the rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals....”); 26.1(b) (“in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the judgment or order is signed....”). Appella nt’s notice of appeal was not filed until June 14, 2023. By letter dated Ju ly 1 1 , 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his appeal was untimely and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless,
within 21 days from the date of the Clerk’s letter, appellant filed a response “ showing aIn the Interest of K.F. and J.M. Page 2 reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal. ” More than 21 days have passed, and appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s letter. Further, t he original filing fee for this appeal has not been paid. By letter dated July 1 1 , 2023, the Clerk of this Cour t notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and that unless appellant obtained indigent status pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, the payment of the fee was required. In the same letter, the Clerk warned appellant that if the original filing fee was not paid within 21 days from the date of the letter, the appeal
would be dismissed. More than 21 days have passed, and the filing fee has not been paid. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3 (a), (c). Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to T EX

. R. A PP

. P ., Order Regarding Fees , § A (Amended Aug. 28, 20 15 , eff. Sept. 1, 20 15 ). See also T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 5. Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2. The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or r educes the fees owed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 1 6 , 2023 [CV 0 6]
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Graham J. Siddall, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/    GRAHAM J.
SIDDALLGraham J. Siddall Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer





September 13, 2002




1
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Crossroads Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (333-116296, 333-106924, 333-62336, 333-37584, 333-92467) on Form S-8 of Crossroads Systems,Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Crossroads Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of October 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes instockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the October 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Crossroads Systems, Inc. 

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, effective April 30, 2004 the Company adopted Financial Accounting StandardsBoard Interpretation No. 46(R), *Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities*. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

January 26, 2005
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John R. Detwiler, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/    JOHN R.
DETWILERJohn R. Detwiler Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





September 13, 2002




1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE
TRUSTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16
<PP&E>                                      87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                              64,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,392
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,485
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,071
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### SUSAN SALOMON v. ELI LILLY & CO.

May 8, 1984.

Certification to the Superior Court, Law Division is granted.
#### TOWN OF HIGHLANDS v. EDWARDS

No. 410P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 363

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001. Justice Martin recused.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/    CHRISTOPHER C.
JUREYChristopher C. Jurey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date: August 7, 2003
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00053

- CV

IN RE JOHN AUSTIN BA SHAM, DARLIA LEE HOBBS, AND TEXAN S FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSPARE NCY RELATOR S

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

T he court has considered relators’ petition for writ of injunction and motion

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be den ied. 2

Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of injun c tion and motion for emergency

relief are denied.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).

2 We cannot take affirmative acts beyon d that necessary for enforcement of this court’s jurisdiction. See In re Williams , No. 02

- 13

- 00087

- CV, 2013 WL 1437253, at *2

– 3 (Tex. App.

– Fort Worth Apr. 8, 201 3, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).2 PER C URIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: February 27, 2014
- IMS Home
- SLPs and WIs
- Forms
- Templates
- Supporting Documents
- IVV Home

## IV&V Management System

The NASA IV&V Management System (IMS) is the NASA IV&V Program’s quality management system. The IMS was established according to NPD 1280.1, NASA Management System Policy. The IMS includes procedures and content to ensure customers receive the highest quality products and services. The IMS is designed to meet the requirements of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001:2015 Standard.

## **Quality Policy**

The NASA IV&V Program’s Mission statement serves as the Program’s quality policy.  This statement and the work performed by the IV&V Program are driven by agency-level content and: 
      - The NASA IV&V Program’s Vision and Mission statements and key agency-level drivers can be found here:  https://confluence.ivv.nasa.gov:8445/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=123602129

The scope of the NASA IV&V Program’s ISO certification applies to:
      - Independent Software Verification and Validation
      - Systems Software Assessments
      - Systems and Software Engineering Research
      - Software Support for the Office Safety and Mission Assurance (OSMA)

## **IMS Content**

**System Level Procedures (SLPs)** – An SLP is a document that provides the principles and operating procedures for a specific aspect of the IMS. An SLP defines the responsibilities of and relationships between organizations implementing procedures within the IMS. An SLP describes what actions shall be performed, as well as when, where, and by whom those actions shall be performed.

**Work Instructions (WIs)** – A WI is a document that provides detailed, systematic instructions on how to perform the specific tasks necessary to ensure consistent working methods and conformance to required quality standards. WIs may be presented as flow charts, assembly or inspection procedures, detailed instructions, manuals, specifications, standards, or other methodologies.

**Forms** – A “Form” is a document associated with a policy, procedure, or process employed by the NASA IV&V Program – usually to collect or disseminate information.

**Templates** – A “Template” is used as a starting point for constructing various NASA IV&V documents. The purpose of a template is to promote consistency among documents and to prevent having to recreate the format each time a new document is developed.

**Supporting Documents** – A “Supporting Document” is a document that describes the structure, purpose, operation, maintenance, and/or requirements for a NASA IV&V construct, system, or process.

**Processes** – A process is set of interrelated or interacting activities that uses inputs to deliver an intended result.  NOTE:  In this context “process” is not synonymous with “procedure” or “document” (although historically we’ve used the terms interchangeably in many instances).  These “processes” are higher level than our SLP’s and Work Instructions.”

For the “Processes” link, just upload and link to this image:  Processes and Process Interaction – IV&V Management System – IV&V Confluence (nasa.gov)

For more information, contact our IMS.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Siranosh Yousif,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03744-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/16/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8332 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8332 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, 

INC., 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL, 

Secretary of the United States Department 

of Health and Human Services; YVETTE 

ROUBIDEAUX, Director of the Indian 

Health Service; RICHIE K. GRINNELL, 

Assistant Surgeon General, Indian Health 

Services, Albuquerque Area Director; 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendants - Appellants. 

No. 14-2051 

(D.C. No. 6:07-CV-00289-MV-SMV) 

(D. N.M.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

This matter is before the court on Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily 

Dismiss Appeal. The motion is granted. The captioned appeal is dismissed pursuant to 

Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b) 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

August 28, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2051 Document: 01019482113 Date Filed: 08/28/2015 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER
28, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,088
<INVENTORY>                                    235,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,391<F1>
<PP&E>                                         132,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,672<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,190
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,672
<SALES>                                         90,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,133
<CGS>                                           67,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,003)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.09)<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)<F5>
<FN>
<F1>10,160 OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
<F2>1,553 OTHER ASSETS
<F3>35,993 LONG TERM DEBT
<F4>2,747 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
<F5>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
2

NP-2020-08-057-LaRC

1. Color the Chalkboard 

2. Color Katherine 

3. Glue paper to cardstock to make cut-out sturdier (if desired) and allow time to dry

4. Cut along the dotted lines 

5. Add a few drops of glue to a wooden stick

6. Attach wooden stick with glue to the back of Katherine cut-out

7. Allow 5+ minutes for glue to dry

www.nasa.gov



Katherine Johnson was an exceptional person whose fascination and skills with numbers and 

math allowed others to reach the stars. Beginning in 1953, Katherine worked as a human 

computer at NASA's predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, or NACA. At 

NASA, she not only calculated the path Alan Shepard, the first American in space, traveled, 

but she also checked the computer calculations for the mission carrying John Glenn, the first 

American to orbit the Earth. After a stellar NASA career involving the space shuttle program 

to satellites, she retired in 1986. Read more about her at: 

https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/who-was-katherine-johnson-k4

Art Instructions:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"John Gould","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgould4\/","title":"Dimitris Lagoudas, Texas A&M University","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V4p45fzWBn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/flight-innovation\/dimitris-lagoudas-texas-am-university\/\">Dimitris Lagoudas, Texas A&M University<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/flight-innovation\/dimitris-lagoudas-texas-am-university\/embed\/#?secret=V4p45fzWBn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dimitris Lagoudas, Texas A&M University” — NASA\" data-secret=\"V4p45fzWBn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/dimitris.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":350}