alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.2

              STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              NINE MONTHS
                                                          ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                          -------------------
                                          
                                                      1996                  1997
                                                      ----                  ----
<S>                                              <C>                     <C>
Net income (loss)                                $   611,240             $  (343,813)
                                                               
Reduction of interest expense                         95,089                       -
                                                               
Interest income                                       87,632                       -
                                                 -----------             -----------
                                                               
Net income (loss) applicable to common                         
  stock and common stock equivalents             $   793,961             $  (343,813)
                                                 ===========             ============
                                                               
Weighted average shares of common stock                        
  outstanding                                     15,179,098              22,479,679
                                                               
Escrowed shares                                     (291,663)               (291,663)
                                                               
Weighted average effect of common stock                        
  equivalents                                      9,775,775                       -
                                                   ---------              ----------
                                                               
Net shares of common stock and common                          
  stock equivalents used in net income                         
  (loss) per share calculations                   24,663,210              22,188,016
                                                  ==========              ==========
                                                               
Net income (loss) per share                          $   .03                   $(.02)
                                                    ========                 ========
</TABLE>





                                       23
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51266

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR AMILCAR RUBI-VALLECILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-652-1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Amilcar Rubi-Vallecillo appeals his 46-month within-guidelines

sentence for illegal reentry after removal as substantively unreasonable. He

argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the illegal reentry guideline

lacks an empirical basis and double counts criminal history, that his motive for

returning to the United States was benign, and that illegal reentry essentially

is a mere trespass offense.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-51266 Document: 00512386211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/25/2013
No. 12-51266

“[A] sentence within a properly calculated Guideline range is

presumptively reasonable.” United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.

2006). Rubi-Vallecillo asserts that a presumption of reasonableness should not

apply to his within-guidelines sentence because the illegal reentry guideline is

not supported by empirical data, but he recognizes that this argument is

foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir. 2009).

We previously have rejected similar arguments challenging the

reasonableness of a sentence. See Duarte, 569 F.3d at 529-31 (arguing the lack

of an empirical basis for the applicable guideline rendered the sentence

unreasonable); United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.

2008) (arguing that benign motive for reentry rendered sentence unreasonable);

United States v. Aguirre-Villa, 460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Cir. 2006) (arguing that

illegal reentry is a mere trespass offense). In the instant case, the district court

had before it both mitigating and aggravating factors. It balanced these factors

and determined that a sentence at the middle of the applicable guidelines range

was appropriate. The fact that this court “might reasonably have concluded that

a different sentence was appropriate is insufficient to justify reversal of the

district court.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). We conclude there

is no reason to disturb the presumption of reasonableness in this case. See

United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-51266 Document: 00512386211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/25/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE 9 MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,340,182
<SECURITIES>                                10,843,825
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,547,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   623,941
<INVENTORY>                                  1,586,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,547,658
<PP&E>                                       6,781,551
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,662,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,848,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,504,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,723
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,247,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,848,247
<SALES>                                     34,312,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,354,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               253,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,191,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                   474,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,716,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,716,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8062

MILTON H. WHITAKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; FREDERICK H.

CREEKMORE; SHEPELLE WATKINS-WHITE; FIRST

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-1575-AM)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton H. Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Milton H. Whitaker appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Whitaker v. Virginia, No. CA-01-1575-AM (E.D.

Va. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000892158
<NAME> LAUREL CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,796
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,234
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,239
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,486
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,685
<LOANS>                                        155,666
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,851
<DEPOSITS>                                     186,829
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,793
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,559
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,634
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 236,851
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,836
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,191
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    45
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,072
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,561
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,121
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,951
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,348
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,620
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.48
<LOANS-NON>                                        536
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,866
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       27
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,856
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,753
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            103


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 3

Subsidiaries of Trintech Group PLC

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Voting Equity Ownership
      Subsidiary      Held by Trintech Group PLC    Country of Incorporation
   ----------------   --------------------------   ---------------------------
   <S>                <C>                          <C>
   Trintech
    Technologies
    Limited                      100%              Republic of Ireland
   Trintech Limited              100%              Republic of Ireland
   Trintech GmbH                 100%              Federal Republic of Germany
   Trintech, Inc.                100%              United States (California)
   Trintech (U.K.)
    Limited                      100%              U.K.
   Trintech Group
    Finance Limited              100%              Cayman Island
</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NICHOLAS BARBELLA.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
SCIENCENTER

Explore Science: Destination Moon

Michelle Kortenaar 

1/29/21 - 1/28/25

Explore Science: Destination Moon will create a new 

toolkit of hands-on STEM activities and a mobile app 

based on NASA's continuing pursuit of human 

exploration of the Moon and space exploration, 

distributed to 350 science centers, children's museums, 

and planetariums. The project will generate a hands-on 

STEM activity toolkit that provides authentic learning 

opportunities that engage visitors in NASA-unique 

content on human exploration. It will also result in a 

new DIY app that extends learning beyond museum 

walls by engaging families at home with content on the 

expansion of human exploration from the Moon to Mars 

and beyond. Finally, the project will generate 

professional development for museum educators to 

effectively lead hands-on activities and facilitate visitor 

interactions with the app and toolkit materials.

List of Partners:

• Ames Research Center

• Children’s Creativity Museum

• Science Museum of Minnesota

• Museum of Life and Science

• Lawrence Hall of Science

• Arizona State University

• National Informal STEM Education Network

Exploring together is fun!

Credits: Sciencenter

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC21M0082, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, of Sify;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosures and controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered
by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 12, 2006
    
    /s/ Durgesh MehtaDurgesh MehtaChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 24.5**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director and/or officer ofeLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power andauthority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of theundersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2008, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/Adeemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which theCompany’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for him and on his behalf in connection therewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required,appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that suchattorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney as of this 28th day of February 2009.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Melvin L. Keating, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report of Quovadx, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
 (b)  [Paragraph omitted in accordance with the SEC exemptive order contained in SECRelease No. 50754]
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation;
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 9, 2005         /s/ Melvin L. Keating   Melvin L. Keating   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Azur International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Donald H. Goree, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Dated:   August 12, 2005                         By:  /s/ Donald H. Goree
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Donald H. Goree
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chairman of the Board