alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sify Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosures and controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2006
    
    /s/ R. RamarajR RamarajChief Executive Officerand Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Matthew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James M. Matthew                                January 24, 2007
--------------------                                ----------------
James M. Matthew                                          Date
Chief Financial Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2043

To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Ronald 

Reagan Federal Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2004

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL

To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

5 228 Walnut Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Federal 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the building referred to in subsection (a) shall 
2

•S 2043 IS 

1 be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald Reagan Federal 

2 Building.

Æ
1:00 PM to 1:15 PM Welcome and Announcements

1:15 PM to 1:45 PM Glenn Research Center (GRC) Welcome/GRC Aeronautics 

Overview

1:45 PM to 2:45 PM ARMD Strategy Overview

2:45 PM - 3:00 PM Break

3:00 PM - 5:00 PM Propulsion Transformation - Electric Propulsion

5:00 PM - 5:05 PM Public Comment Period

5:05 PM - 5:30 PM Committee Deliberations

5:30 PM Adjourn

9:00 AM to 9:15 AM Welcome and Announcements

9:15 AM to 11:15 AM Autonomy Strategy

11:15 AM to 11:45 AM Committee Deliberations

11:45 AM to 11:50 AM Public Comment Period

11:50 AM - 12:00 PM Work Plan and Schedule

12:00 PM Adjourn

JOIN MEETING ONLINE https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/

Meeting Number 900 824 618 

Password PvYA3mu*

JOIN BY PHONE

Toll Free: 1-888-769-8716

Passcode: 6813159#

Thursday, July 25 (Sessions are public except as noted)

Cleveland, OH 44135

Wednesday, July 24 (Sessions are public except as noted)

NAC Aeronautics Committee Public FINAL Agenda

July 24-25, 2019

NASA Glenn Research Center

Mission Integration Center, Building 162, Room 302
#### In the Matter of Kevin Smith, Petitioner, v Supreme Court, Kings County, et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 667]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the Supreme Court, Kings County, and James F. Imperatrice, the Chief Clerk of Kings County, to issue a determination in accordance with CPL 440.30 (7) on the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to set aside the verdict rendered in *People v Kevin Smith*in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 2183/86, which motion was denied on November 22, 1988.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

*570Under the circumstances of this case, while mandamus to compel may lie, because of the petitioner’s unreasonable delay in bringing this proceeding to compel the Supreme Court to issue a determination in accordance with CPL 440.30 (7) on his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, the proceeding is barred by the doctrine of laches (see *Austin v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y.,*5 NY2d 430 [1959]; *Yonkers Racing Corp. v City of Yonkers,*301 AD2d 592 [2003]; *Matter of Thomas v City of Buffalo Inspections Dept.,*275 AD2d 1004 [2000]; *Matter of Densmore v Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. School Dist.,*265 AD2d 838 [1999]; *Matter of Civil Serv. Empls. Assn. v Board of Educ., Patchogue-Medford Union Free School Dist.,*239 AD2d 415 [1997]; *Matter of Kolson v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*53 AD2d 827 [1976]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Reply to Attn of

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

John F. Kennedy Space Center
Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

July 10, 2023

cc

TO: All NASA Employees
FROM: CC/Chief Counsel

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 2023
Innovators Gala of the Neil Armstrong Award of Excellence, August 19, 2023

The Astronaut Scholarship Foundation (ASF), a nonprofit organization under section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host the upcoming 2023 Innovators Gala
featuring the Neil Armstrong Award of Excellence on Saturday, August 19, 2023, at Hilton
Orlando, in Orlando, Florida. ASF is in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing of
invitations for this event. More than 300 guests are expected to attend the gala, which
consists of a reception, dinner, and program celebrating and awarding the 2023 Class of
Astronaut Scholars, the innovators of tomorrow. Gala guests will include corporate and
industry executives, community leaders, teachers, scholars' family and friends, military
leaders, and many more. The value of the gala is approximately $375 a person.

In accordance with 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g), Gifts of Free Attendance at Widely Attended
Gatherings, I find these events meet the requirements of a widely attended gathering, and I
further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend these
events because their participation will further Agency programs and operations. These events
will allow NASA employees to honor and show support for a program celebrating current and
former awardees of the Award of Excellence and accomplishments in academia. These
events will also provide a forum for the attendees to disseminate information on NASA's
ongoing activities and to discuss matters of interest to NASA with a diverse group of fellow
attendees. Because of these benefits to NASA, and having considered the factors enumerated
in 5 CFR § 2635.204(g)(4), I also find that the Agency's interest in NASA employees!
attendance outweighs the concern that such employees may be, or may appear to be,
improperly influenced in the performance of official duties.

Accordingly, NASA employees whose duties do not substantially affect the sponsor,
including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge
under Executive Order 13770, may accept an invitation for complimentary attendance at these
events. NASA employees whose duties may substantially affect the sponsor, such as by way


of procurement duties or administration of Space Act agreements, should seek an individual
determination regarding participation in these events from the Office of the General Counsel.

In addition, this is a fundraising event for ASF. NASA employees may not participate in the
promotion, production, or presentation of the event and including serving as honorary
chairperson, sitting at a head table during the event, and standing in a reception line.

Digitally signed by DANIEL

DANIEL SHAVER shaver

Date: 2023.07.11 08:41:04 -04'00'

Daniel P. Shaver
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0835

Lower Tribunal No. 19-15449

________________

Arsenio Rodriguez,

Appellant,

vs.

Eamon Guilfoyle,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alexander Bokor, 

Judge.

Roniel Rodriguez IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez IV, for appellant.

Eamon Guilfoyle, in proper person.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O H N RA Y M I LLER, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. J I M B E N E D E T T I , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 16906 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 0 7 7 - LRH

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da L a rryR . H i c ks , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B e f o r e : R Y M E R , M c K E O W N , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . N evada s t at e pri soner J oh n R ayM i l l erappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s de ni a l of

the m ot i on f

orr e c ons i de r a t i on he f

i l e d pur s uantt o F e de r a l R ul e of C i v i l P r o c e du r e 6 0 ( b ) . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 2 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dwe 

# FI LED APR15 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 16906 2 a f f i rm. M ille rc o n te n d s th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db yd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e c o n s id e r . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g M ille r ’s m o tio n to r e c o n s id e rb e c au s e h e p r e s e n te dn o g r o u n d s ju s tif y in g r e lie f

u n d e rR u le 6 0 ( b ) . See B a cklu n d

v. B a rn h a rt , 7 7 8 F .2 d1 3 8 6 , 1 3 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 5 ) . M i l l er ’ s m ot i on t o rem and the ca se because the S t at e di d n otfi l e an a n s w e r in g b r ie f

is d e n ie d . AF F I RME D.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

p0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144961

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144961

COA: 306929

Macomb CC: 2010-000721-FH

MYRON ODELL BANKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6696

JAMES STROUSE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUREAU OF PRISONS; K. KIDDY, Unit Manager; BLACKBURN, 

Counselor; BERNARDO, SIS; BENNETT, DHO; WHITLEY, Trust Fund 

Supervisor; E. D. WILSON, Warden; NEGRONE, SIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00044-REP)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Strouse, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Strouse appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents 

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), without prejudice 

in part and with prejudice in part. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Strouse v. Bureau of 

Prisons, No. 3:13-cv-00044-REP (E.D. Va April 21, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that
the undersigned director and/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as the undersigneds true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to:

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigneds capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 1, 2011, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the Form 10-K), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules
thereunder;

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Companys Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for him
and on his behalf in connection therewith; and

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection
with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-facts substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and
powers herein granted.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney as of this 14th
day of February 2011.



/s/ MICHAEL J. MURRAYSignatureMichael J. MurrayPrinted Name
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the Issuer) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Curtis J. Clawson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Issuer.



/s/ Curtis J. Clawson
Curtis J. Clawson
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002
`[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68001-68006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Federal-State Unemployment Compensation Program: Certifications 
for 2010 under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Labor signed the annual certifications under 
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. 3301 et seq., thereby 
enabling employers who make contributions to state unemployment funds 
to obtain certain credits against their liability for the federal 
unemployment tax. By letter, the certifications were transmitted to the 
Secretary of the Treasury. The letter and certifications are printed 
below.


[[Page 68002]]



    Signed in Washington, DC, on November 1, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO10.014


[[Page 68003]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO10.015


[[Page 68004]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO10.016


[[Page 68005]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO10.017


[[Page 68006]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO10.018

[FR Doc. 2010-27899 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-C`
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph D. Sansone, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pediatric Services of America, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation ; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 5, 2004
#### Lester Ryan *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 1-1273A221.

Filed July 9, 1974.

Rehearing denied August 12, 1974.

Transfer denied October 31, 1974.]

*676
      *William C. Erbecker,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Robert F. Colker,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Pee Cueiam.

— Defendant-appellant Ryan raises but one issue on appeal. It concerns the legality of his sentence.

Ryan plead guilty to assault and battery. His sentence was for 180 days to be served from 8:00 A.M. each Sunday to 8:00 A.M. the following Tuesday until the time was completed. Ryan complained of the sentence in his motion to correct errors; accordingly, the trial judge modified the sentence making Ryan serve the period at one time.

There is no error for two reasons. First, the relief sought in the motion to correct errors was granted making the question moot. Second, the trial court may amend an erroneous sentence. *Jacobs*v. *State*(1972), 153 Ind. App. 102, 286 N.E.2d 224

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported at 313 N.E.2d 351.