alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

h0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145030

TERRY WILSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145030

COA: 305590

CVSC: 10-001359

CRIME VICTIM SERVICES COMMISSION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certificationpursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report of Santa Fe Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not inits individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Trust.

|                           | /s/ MIKE  ULRICH                 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      | Mike Ulrich,                     |
| Date: August 8, 2006 | Vice President and Trust Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           5,008,088
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          6,327,504
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      3,820
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                1,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,332,901
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         103,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               103,432
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        4,910,053
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              79,716
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              79,716
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        1,319,416
<NET-ASSETS>                    6,229,469
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   7,947
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     696
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    212,642
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (203,999)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             (400)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>        (151,352)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (355,751)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (355,751)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              79,298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   212,891
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            6,407,345
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  65
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (3)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    62
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                       3.3
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 24.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director and/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as theundersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 26, 2009, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rulesthereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for himand on his behalf in connection therewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connectionwith the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights andpowers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power ofAttorney as of this 1st day of March 2010.
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM, INC.

Providing STEM Programming to Middle 

School Students in Underserved 

Communities in Eastern and Southern 

Connecticut

Brian J Koehler

02/01/22- 5/31/23

Development and delivery of a Planetarium-based 

STEM curriculum anchored with NASA content, 

provided to all seventh graders at local low-income 

schools to address achievement/access gaps. The first 

series will use NASA’s “Solar System and Beyond: 

Discovering the Secrets of Our Universe” theme to 

address the Middle School Earth and Space Sciences 

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). The 

second series will link the NASA Theme “Moon to Mars: 

Moon Lights the Way” and the NGSS Middle School 

Engineering Design storyline. Students will benefit from 

inspiring stories of diverse representation in STEM 

fields and engaging, empowering exercises in 

navigation and observation that, together, show 

students they have a place in STEM opportunities.

List of Partners:

• Windham Middle School

• St. Martin de Porres Academy Treworgy Planetarium at Mystic Seaport Museum

Credits: Mystic Seaport Museum

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0441, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
#### TRENTON SUPERIOR POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. S. HOWARD WOODSON, JR., PRESIDENT, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### CAROL K. SHANNON v. JOSEPH *G.*SHANNON.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
United Launch Alliance Commercial Crew Development Round 1 (CCDev1) Space Act Agreement

NNJ10TA06S

ULA CCDev1 Space Act Agreement

ULA SAA Amendment 01
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4750

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID DEANGELO MCNEIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cr-00229-RJC-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Richmond McPherson, III, MCPHERSON LAW, PLLC, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Sanjeev 

Bhasker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Deangelo McNeil appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his 

supervised release and sentencing him to a prison term of one year and one day. Finding 

no reversible error, we affirm.

“A district court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence upon revocation 

of supervised release.” United States v. Webb, 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). “We 

will affirm a revocation sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not ‘plainly 

unreasonable.’” Id. “When reviewing whether a revocation sentence is plainly 

unreasonable, we must first determine whether it is unreasonable at all.” United States v. 

Thompson, 595 F.3d 544, 546 (4th Cir. 2010). A revocation sentence is procedurally 

reasonable if the district court adequately explains the sentence after considering the 

Sentencing Guidelines’ Chapter Seven policy statements and the applicable 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) (2012) factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (2012); Thompson, 595 F.3d at 546-

47. If there is no significant procedural error, we then consider the sentence’s substantive 

reasonableness under the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 552 

U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

McNeil claims that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district 

court failed to explain adequately its reasons for imposing a prison term of one year and 

one day. Having reviewed the record, we find the district court’s explanation sufficient. 

See Thompson, 595 F.3d at 547 (discussing standard). We also reject McNeil’s argument 

that his sentence, which exceeded by one day the applicable Sentencing Guidelines’ 

advisory policy statement range, is substantively unreasonable.
3

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 13, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

JIMMY DALE STRAHAN, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 14-7062 

 (D.C. No. 6:13-CR-00046-RAW-1) 

 (E.D. Okla.) 

 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Before MATHESON, O'BRIEN, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

 Jimmy Dale Strahan fraudulently enticed several individuals to invest in his 

saltwater disposal company.1

 But, instead of using the money to further the business, he 

used it for his own personal pleasures, namely to feed his gambling addiction. He pled 

guilty (without the benefit of a plea agreement) to one count of wire fraud. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1343. The presentence report (PSR) calculated an advisory guideline range of 27 to 33 

months imprisonment. He did not object to the PSR. He moved for a downward 

variance to 18 months imprisonment based on his good intentions, age (63-years-old at 

the time of sentencing), health (diabetes, heart murmur, high blood pressure, and bad 

 

1

 Saltwater is a by-product of the oil drilling process. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

March 17, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-7062 Document: 01019399827 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 1 
- 2 - 

knees), and gambling addiction. The district judge denied the motion, sentenced him to 

the bottom of the guideline range, and ordered him to pay $685,347.25 in restitution. 

 Appointed counsel reviewed the record and found no arguable issue for appeal. 

Based on that review he filed an Anders2

 brief and has moved to withdraw. Although 

invited to do so, Strahan has not filed a response. The government has also declined to 

respond. 

 Our task in an Anders case is to “conduct a full examination of the record to 

determine whether defendant’s claims are wholly frivolous.” United States v. Calderon,

428 F.3d 928, 930 (10th Cir. 2005). If they are, we may grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and dismiss the appeal. Id. “Frivolous means lacking a legal basis or legal 

merit; not serious; not reasonably purposeful.” United States v. Lain, 640 F.3d 1134, 

1137 (10th Cir. 2011) (quotations omitted). After a careful review of the entire record, 

we find no reason to question the voluntariness of Strahan’s guilty plea or the procedural 

or substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Like counsel, we see no non-frivolous 

grounds for appeal. 

 We GRANT the motion to withdraw and DISMISS this appeal. 

Entered by the Court: 

Terrence L. O’Brien 

United States Circuit Judge 

 

2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Appellate Case: 14-7062 Document: 01019399827 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

DAVID RAY GUTIERREZ, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT PATTON, Director, Oklahoma 

Department of Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 14-6230

(D.C. No. 5:14-CV-00591-C)

(W.D. Okla.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 17, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-6230 Document: 01019400159 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2331

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2004

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

For the relief of Fereshteh Sani.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2331 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

2 FERESHTEH SANI. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Fereshteh Sani shall be eligible for issuance of an 

6 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

7 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil8 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

9 section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to law10 ful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Fereshteh Sani en12 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

13 in subsection (c), Fereshteh Sani shall be considered to 

14 have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

15 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi16 gration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 

17 of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Fereshteh Sani, the Secretary of State shall in26 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 
3

S 2331 RFH 

1 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi2 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of birth of Fereshteh Sani under section 203(a) of the 

4 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

5 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

6 to natives of the country of birth of Fereshteh Sani under 

7 section 202(e) of that Act.

Passed the Senate October 11, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### WEST SIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY.

June 12, 1984.

Certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider on the merits the propriety of the Board’s denial of plaintiff’s variance application.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14138 and #14139]


California Disaster #CA-00225

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of CALIFORNIA dated 10/01/2014.
    Incident: Boles Fire.
    Incident Period: 09/15/2014 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 10/01/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/01/2014.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/01/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Siskiyou.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Del Norte; Humboldt; Modoc; Shasta; Trinity.
    Oregon: Jackson; Josephine; Klamath.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14138 5 
and for economic injury is 14139 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, 
Oregon.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)


     Dated: October 1, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-23975 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
- 

1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, the (Report), I,
Deborah F. Ricci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 906 1350, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Deborah F. Ricci
Deborah F. RicciChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
Officer)

May 16, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

-20 -