alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David C. Owen, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A-2 of ICOP Digital, Inc.;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
|                     |                                    |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/  DAVID C. OWEN                      |
|                     | David  C. Owen                          |
|                     | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                     | * *                                |
| Date: June 23, 2005 | * *                                |

 

----
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORY TURNER, Acting Administrative

Program Director SPTP; BRENDA

WEST HAGERMAN, Legal Counsel for

LSH; JON BADGER, Legal Counsel for

Kansas SRS; JOHN HOUSE, Legal

Counsel for Kansas SRS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

------------------------------

MARK D. BRULL; SUTTON R.

LOVINGOOD,

 Movants.

No. 10-3054

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-03130-SAC) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3054 Document: 01018385121 Date Filed: 03/16/2010 Page: 1
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63  of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the periodic report  of MIVA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,  2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,  William Seippel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of  the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of  the United States Code, that:





1)  the Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934, and





2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification has not been, and  shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





|                                            | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ William Seippel                         | 
|                                            | 
|William Seippel,    Chief Financial Officer | 
|MIVA, Inc.                                  | 
|                                            | 
|Date: March 16,    2006                     |
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Health Systems
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Susan Baxter Gibson, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:      /s/ Susan Baxter Gibson
         ------------------------
         Susan Baxter Gibson
         Principal Financial Officer
         February 14, 2005
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jay Warren Arnold, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00062

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 54th District Court of McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- 08

- C2 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We further order that the appellant, Jay Warren Arnold, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBE R 29, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.30

                                            [MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES LETTERHEAD]

MEMO

TO:    Corporate Bonus Plan Participants
FROM:  Don Roberts
       Vickie Capps
DATE:  February 8, 2000
RE:    2000 BONUS PLAN


     The Board of Directors has approved a new bonus plan for fiscal year 2000
containing the following terms and conditions.  It is important to note that
this plan is for this calendar year only.

     1. The threshold for earning any bonus is the "base case" budget for the
        consolidated, continuing operations of the Company for the year 2000:
        revenue of $156.569 million and operating profit of $1.170 million.
        If the results for the year exceed both of these figures, bonuses
        will be paid.

     2. 100% of target bonuses will be earned if the Company achieves its
        "target case" or target plan for fiscal year 2000 consolidated,
        continuing operations revenue of $165.553 million and operating
        profit of $3.915 million.

     3. For results up to the midpoint between the base case and the target
        plan, one-third of target bonus can be earned.  Results at the
        midpoint will result in a full one-third earned.  Between the base
        case and the midpoint, some portion of the full one-third will be
        earned, with revenue and profit each contributing 50% to the
        calculation, which will be done on a linear basis.

     4. Above the midpoint and up to the target plan, the other two-thirds of
        target bonus is earned, again with 50% determined by revenue and 50%
        by operating profit and calculated on a linear basis.

     5. Revenue and operating profit attributable to businesses acquired
        during the year are excluded from this calculation, and nonrecurring
        licensing, funded R&D or other "deal" money not otherwise in the
        target plan will be considered only at the discretion of the CEO and
        the Board of Directors.  For purposes of this Plan, operating profit
        will be calculated after giving effect to bonus payments and before
        any restructuring charge.

     6. Additional bonuses will be available for performance in excess of the
        target plan.  Additional bonuses will be based on incremental net
        income to Maxwell from continuing operations from above-target
        achievement.  Because of the complexity of the current fiscal year,
        there will be a discretionary element to the calculation of any
        additional bonuses.  However, the intent would be to make additional
        bonuses significant for above-target performance.

     7. Each individual's bonus will also be subject to a performance factor
        based on that individual's job performance during the year.  Bonus
        participants must be employed on the last day of the calendar year
        (December 31, 2000) to be eligible for any bonus payout.
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NP-2021-5-662-GSFC 1/4

Demostración de relés de 

comunicaciones láser

Las comunicaciones láser utilizan luz 

infrarroja, invisible para el ojo humano, 

para enviar información desde el 

espacio a los científicos en la Tierra.

DATO CURIOSO
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Demostración de relés de 

comunicaciones láser

LCRD necesita cielos despejados para 

enviar datos a la Tierra, por lo que 

"hablará" con estaciones terrestres 

muy por encima de las nubes, en las 

montañas de Hawái y California.

DATO CURIOSO

NP-2021-5-662-GSFC 2/4
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NP-2021-5-662-GSFC 3/4

En 2021, LCRD se lanzará 

desde Florida en un cohete 

súper rápido y volará al 

espacio en una nave de la 

Fuerza Espacial de EE.UU.

DATO 

CURIOSO

Demostración de relés de 

comunicaciones láser
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

LCRD utilizará láseres para "hablar" con la Estación Espacial 

Internacional, que recopila información de los instrumentos 

científicos que tiene a bordo. Esta información luego se 

transmitirá a LCRD y se enviará a la Tierra.

Demostración de relés de 

comunicaciones láser

NP-2021-5-662-GSFC 4/4

DATO CURIOSO
PORTAGE PARTNERS, LTD.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY


                                                            (Deficit)
                              Common   Add'tnl    Accumulated      Total
                              Stock      Paid         During            Stock-
Paid-in                   Shares      In           Development     holder's
                             Amount    Capital       Stage              Equity


August 20, 1999     2,500,000
Founders shares     $2,500      $75            $  -                $2,575


August 20, 1999
Shares issued      2,000,000
Stock dividend      2,000                        (2,000)                     -

Net (loss)
August 18, 1999
(inception) to
June 30, 2000                                          -                      -

Balance,
June 30, 2000      4,500,000
                            $4,500       $75          $(2,000)           $2,575

Net (loss)
For the year ended
June 30, 2001                                           (3,775)         (3,775)


Balance,           4,500,000
June 30, 2001       4,500            75             (5,775)          (1,200)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2002                                                (687)        (687)

Balance,          4,500,000
June 30, 2002       4,500             75               (6,462)      (1,887)


The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund V, L.P.  (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:
August 11, 2004


/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
-------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Executive Vice President of General
Partner, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to March 5, 2019)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-18-128 State v. Tiller

A-18-481 State v. Redmond

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avici Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Leighton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                        
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM LEIGHTON
| |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | William Leighton       
| |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | March 15, 2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM CINTON LEWIS.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL KRAKOWSKY.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 14,159.

#### Arbuckle et al. *v.*Swim.

Assignment on *Ebbob.*— Availability *of Error in Favor of All Joining.*— An assignment of error must assign an error which is available in favor of all who join in the assignment.

*Pbactice.*— Evidence.—Not *Properly in*Record.— *Supreme Court.*— Where what purports to be the evidence is written out and signed by a person who adds to his name the word “ reporter,” and is attached to the transcript, no question upon the evidence is presented for consideration, it not being properly in the record.

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

*J. Stafford*and *T. E. Boyd,*for appellants.

*T. J. Kane*and *T. P. Davis,*for appellee.

Olds, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants for the foreclosure of a vendor’s lien on certain real estate. The complaint is in four paragraphs. The appellants each filed separate demurrers to each paragraph of the complaint, which were overruled, and they severally excepted to the ruling. Issues were joined, and trial had, resulting in a finding, judgment and decree in favor of appellee.

*209Filed April 8, 1890.

Appellant Maxy E. Arbuckle filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and she excepted. Appellants jointly assign as erx-ors the overruling of the appellant Mary E. Arbuckle’s demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint, and the overruling of her motion for a new trial.

As will be seen, the rulings of the court assigned as eiTor were upon the separate demurrers of Mary E. Arbuckle to the complaint, and her separate motion for a new trial, and the appellants jointly assign as error such rulings against Mary E. Ai’buckle. This presents no question for the decision of this court. An assignment of ex-ror, like a complaint, must assign an error which is available in favor of all who join in the assignment. This is well settled by numerous decisions of this court. See *Sparklin*v. *Wardens, etc.,*119 Ind. 535; *Orton*v. *Tilden,*110 Ind. 131; *Robbins*v. *Magee,*96 Ind. 174, and authoi’ities cited in support of the decisions in those cases.

The only question px-esented by the motion for a new trial relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and if there was a proper assignment of error to present the question as to the ruling on the motion, the evidence is not in the record so as to be considered. It does not purport to be embodied in a bill of exceptions, nor is it even copied into the record or certified to by the clerk. There is what purports to be the evidence written out and signed by a person who adds to his name the word *“*reporter,” and this is attached to the transcript. Evidence sought to be brought into the record in this manner can not be considered.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PEDRO BRACHO.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLWY930000-L51100000-GN0000-LVEMK10CW370; WYW140590]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of correction.

# SUMMARY:

On September 7, 2010, the Bureau of Land Management published a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Gas Hills Uranium Project, Fremont and Natrona Counties, Wyoming (75 FR 54384). The notice inadvertently contained an incorrect legal land description. The correct legal land description for the Gas Hills Uranium Project location is as follows:

## Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 32 N., R. 89 and 90 W.

T. 33 N., R. 89 and 90 W.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristin Yannone, Project Leader, at 307-332-8448.

Donald A. Simpson,

State Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-27801 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LUZ MARIA FLORES.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,219,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,371,636
<PP&E>                                          32,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,404,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,219,076
<BONDS>                                          6,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,404,144
<SALES>                                         53,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,333
<CGS>                                           62,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (39,115)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (8,713)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,147
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
. -. .. _.

.-

### _. . . _. Qo;r, CoP. Mat, FW lo, 1939, pscS b . . . .

. ..* -.. c. ,‘. . ?ctlq,7e~i0, 1sss. xbfp 3 . . - -- .

-

- 1; .

. :

- .

### scn.**c, r.**  **iwat,robnaQrrlo;** 1a2m,n2@s-4