alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick A. McGowan, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of GeneMax Corp.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 27, 2006
"*Patrick A. McGowan*"
#### Russell *v.*Todd.

Monday, *November*25.

A vendor of real estate having an equitable lien on it for part of the purchase-money, is not obliged (the vendee having absconded) to proceed against the land by attachment; but he may enforce his lien in equity.

ERROR to the *Cass*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.—

*Todd*filed a bill in equity against Russell, alleging that the complainant was seised and possessed of certain real estate, which he sold and conveyed to the defendant; that a part of the purchase-money only was paid down ; that for the balance the defendant executed his note to the complainant which remained ‘ unpaid; that the com*240plainant had never waived his lien upon the land for that part of the purchase-money still due ; that the defendant left the state, leaving no other property except the land thus conveyed to him by the complainant. The prayer of the bill is, that the defendant account to the complainant for the balance of the purchase-money not paid, and interest; and that in default of paying it, the land be sold for its satisfaction ; and for general relief. A demurrer to the bill for want of equity was overruled; and the defendant failing to plead or answer, after one continuance of the cause, the Court decreed according to the prayer of the bill.

*W. Wright,*for the plaintiff.

*D. D.*Pratt, for the defendant.

It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the bill cannot be sustained, because it shows upon its face that the complainant had a remedy at law by the process of foreign attachment. This objection is groundless. The complainant is not seeking, in the character of a general creditor, to collect a debt. He is seeking the enforcement of an equitable lien. Such a lien he holds, as the vendor of the land, to the amount of the purchase-money not paid. He was not bound to resort to an attachment; and had he done so, he *might,*in a great measure, have lost the benefit of his lien. Under an attachment, all the creditors of the defendant might have filed their demands, and shared, *pro rata,*with the complainant, the avails of the land. The demurrer to the bill was correctly overruled.

*Per Curiam.*

— The decree is affirmed with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher M. Gleeson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Christopher M. GleesonChristopher M. GleesonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorNovember 1, 2004
#### F. M. Bohannank *v.*W. C. Mills.

Pleading — Answer—Set-offs.

An answer setting up a set-off for “services rendered, cash advanced, loaned, etc.,” cannot be held good for an item in the account “for board of negro boy.” The “etc.” cannot be regarded as an allegation to anything.

Attorney and Client — Continuance of Cause — Withdrawal of Attorney from the Case.

Upon calling of a cause, for trial, if counsel withdraws and has his name stricken from it, it is the duty of the court to continue the action and award a rule against plaintiff to prosecute his suit. A dealy for such'rule can rarely produce injury when to give judgment immediately upon withdrawal of counsel, is fraught with great danger to the client.

APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON COURT. C. P.

September 19, 1868.

Opinion op the Oourt by

Judge Williams :

The allegations of the answer setting up an off-set and asking *598judgment over are for *“services rendered, cash advanced, loaned,*&c." In the account filed are the following items, which constituted the greater part of the claim for $314 set up as the off-set:

*Marshall*& *Clarice, Harlan & Newman, for appellant.*

*Mix, for appellee.*

Board of negro boy James from April 1, 1865, to

September 25, 1865 ...........................$118

Board for negro girl Mat . :................... 30

Making an aggregate sum of..................$208

Whatever may be said of the imperfection of the reply, it was not more so than the answer and set-off, for the allegation of “services and cash advanced and loaned,” could not authorize a recovery for board; the “&c.,” as Lord Ooke long since said, “means anything or nothing,” and therefore cannot be regarded as an allegation as to any thing.

Strike these items for $208 from the set-off, and there remains $106 — when the plaintiff acknowledges an indebtedness of $120 to the defendant, showing a right of recovery in him of $14. But as a jury on a previous trial found for plaintiff $131.60-100, which the court set aside because it supposed the set-off not replied to, overlooking the imperfection of the answer, and as on the calling of the cause the plaintiffs counsel had their names stricken from it, the court should have continued the cause with a rule against the plaintiff to prosecute his suit; this would be but fair to him if his counsel for justifiable cause, unknown to him, should abandon the case, and but fair to the court to ascertain whether practitioners in his court for an unjustifiable cause or censurable practice has adopted such a course.

A delay for such rule can rarely produce injury, when to give judgment immediately upon counsel’s withdrawal from a case is fraught with great, danger to the client.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial and with leave to either party to amend and perfect their pleadings.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin Masterston,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03674-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8293 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Miguel Tapia, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 747]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Clemente, J.), entered March 18, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and again was denied parole release. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board in August 2004, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed *(see Matter of Baez v Travis,*10 AD3d 778 [2004]).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### MABEL UZCATEQUI-GAYMON & JAMES UZCATEQUI-GAYMON v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 March 14, 2024

Reply to Attention of: General Law PracticeGroup

TO: 

FROM:

Distribution

Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Annual Awards Gala on 

March 15, 2024

The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), a not-for-profit 

organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold a 

reception dinner and awards ceremony on March 15, 2024, at The John F. Kennedy 

Center, 2700 F. St., NW, Washington, DC, from 5:30 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. AIAA is in 

control of the planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. The event is to

recognize and celebrate individuals and organizations who have made tremendous 

achievements within the aerospace industry. 

Approximately 400 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a 

diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, 

representatives of the legislative branch, and representatives from academia and industry. 

The estimated cost of the event, including all food, beverages and items listed above, is 

approximately $230 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to 

exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas 

and views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs and operations. NASA employees -

including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989 - who do not have a significant role in a matter

affecting the interests of AIAA may accept an invitation for free attendance for 

themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency' s 

interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear 

to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate 
 2

determination from their local NASA ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the 

invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone
#### Obimefuna O. ANYAH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael HESTON, Acting District Director, Ins; James Ziglar, Commissioner of Ins; John Ashcroft, Attorney General for USA, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-21287.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 10, 2003.

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Obimefuna O. Anyah (Anyah) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his removal *301pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(a)(5)(A), which authorizes the removal, *in absentia,*of any alien who fails to attend a removal proceeding after being given notice thereof. He argues that his constitutional right to due process was violated because he was detained and ordered removed without proper notice and without the opportunity to be heard in his removal proceedings.

Contrary to the Government’s assertions, we have jurisdiction over Anyah’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition because, as an alien who is removable for having committed an aggravated felony, he is precluded by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) from seeking direct judicial review, and his petition raises questions of law only. *See CalcanoMartinez v. INS,*533 U.S. 348, 351-52, 121 S.Ct. 2268, 150 L.Ed.2d 392 (2001); *INS V. St. Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 314, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001).

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) properly sent the notices of Anyah’s removal proceeding and hearing to the last address provided by him. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1); *United States v. Estrada-Trochez,*66 F.3d 733, 736 (5th Cir.1995). Anyah did not notify the INS of his change of address as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1305. *See Estrada-Trochez,*66 F.3d at 736. Moreover, Anyah has not demonstrated that he did not receive notice or that his failure to appear at his removal hearing was due to “exceptional circumstances.” *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C). Accordingly, we conclude that Anyah was not denied due process of law and is not entitled to habeas relief. *See Estrada-Trochez,*66 F.3d at 736.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Maria E. Alarcon,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03615-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8313 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Bonita K. Maravich, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03494-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8616 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

U.S. Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Designation of Performance Review Board Chair.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair designee for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all previously published lists of Performance Review Board Chair.

# DATES:

This appointment is effective as of September 30, 2014.

Dennis M. Miotla.

Issued in Washington, DC, October 2, 2014. 

Tonya M. Mackey,

Director, Office of Executive Resources, Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-24017 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
1

NASA Dream with Us Design Challenge 

Submission Form

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Attach this submission form to your completed project at https://stemgateway.nasa.gov/s/

course-offering/a0B3d000001k6Zj/. Submission portal will be open from March 1 through April 30.

Students Name: 

School:

City: State:

Grade Level:

Parent or Teacher Email:

I certify that the submission, including text and illustrations, and any ancillary material were made 

by the Applicant indicated, and were not copied from another work, photograph, illustration or 

website, nor made by another. I represent that this submission does not infringe any third-party 

intellectual property rights, nor does it contain any material that is defamatory, vulgar, or otherwise 

inappropriate. I give permission to National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to use, 

reproduce, prepare derivative works, publish, distribute copies to the public, perform publicly, and 

display publicly the submission, including text and illustrations, and any ancillary material, including but not limited to, Applicant’s name, school, grade/level of study, and any photographs and/

or videos containing the Applicant’s image and/or voice, for all purposes deemed appropriate by 

NASA. NASA may distribute the submission, including text and illustrations, and any ancillary material through a variety of media, including but not limited to print, television, websites, or any other 

means. NASA may also permit a third party to exercise NASA’s rights, including but not limited to 

the right to display or distribute the submission, including text and illustrations, and any ancillary 

material, in a manner NASA deems appropriate. 

I understand that the grant of rights and permissions given by me herein constitute an unconditional gift or donation to NASA in accordance with Section 20113(d) of the National Aeronautics and 

Space Act (51 U.S.C. 20113(d)). I understand that my submission may be eligible for appearance 

on NASA webpages, NASA social media, and other locations if selected, but that no further compensation of any kind will be paid by NASA or any of its authorized third parties to use, reproduce, 

prepare derivative works, publish, distribute, perform publicly and/or display publicly the submission, any ancillary material, or student information, image or voice as provided for in this agreement. 
2

NASA Dream with US Design Challenge 

Submission Form

I hereby unconditionally release NASA, its employees, NASA’s contractors and their employees, and 

NASA representatives from any and all claims and demands arising out of the activities authorized 

under this agreement. 

I certify I am at least 18 years of age and have read the foregoing Official Rules and fully understand 

and agree to the contents. 

I hereby certify that (child’s name) has my 

permission to submit artwork to the NASA Dream with Us Design Challenge.

My child’s teacher has permission to submit artwork to the NASA Dream with Us 

Design Challenge.

X (Parent Signature).

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration