alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GE & 

0 EXAS 

February 11, 1953 

Hon. R. A. Weinert Opinion No. S-04 

Chairman 

Senate State Affairs Com- Re: Constitutionalitv of the 

mittee 

Fifty-third Legislature 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

provision in Senate Bill 

98, 531-d Legislature, 

authorizing Boards of 

Trustees of independent 

school-distribts to appoint tax assessor-collectors for a term of 

office not to exceed 

three years. 

Yo'u have requested an opinion concerning the 

constitutionality of Senate Bill 98, 53rd Legislature, 

a.uthorizing Boards of Tr,ustees of an independent school 

district to appoint a tax assessor-collector for a term 

of office not to exceed three years. 

Section 16 of Article VII of the Constitution 

of Texas provides: 

“The Legislature shall fix by law the 

terms of all offices of the public school 

system and of the State institutions of 

higher education, inclusive, and the terms 

of members of the respective boards, not 

to exceed six years." 

In construing this provision it was held in 

Popham v. Patterson, 121 Tex. 615, 51 S.W.2d 680 (1932) 

that since the office of co,unts superintendent was 

purely statutory the Legislature had the authority to 

fix the term of office of county school superintendent 

at any period not exceed six years. Since the office 

of tax assessor and collector for independent school 

districts is purely statutory (Articles 2758, 2779, and 

2791, V.C,S,) it is our opinion that the case of Popham 

v. Patterson is applicable to Senate Bill 98. 

Therefore, the Legislature is a,uthorized to 

prescribe any term for the office of tax assessor and 

collector of independent school districts not to exceed 
Hon. R. A. Weiner, page 2 (S-04) 

six years. Senate Bill.98 providesfor a term of office not to exceed three years and is therefore constitutional. 

SUMMARY 

The provision of Senate Bill 98, 53rd 

Legislature, authorizing Boards of Trustees 

of independent school districts to appoint 

tax assessor-collector for a term of office 

not to exceed three years is constit,utional. 

Tex. Const. Article VII, Sec. 16. 

Yo'urs very truly, 

APPROVED: 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

County Affairs Division 

JOHN BEN SHEPPERD 

Attorney General 

Willis E. Gresham 

Reviewer By Bi!$%%kAssistant 

Robert S. Trotti 

First Assistant 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

BEL:am
#### Bradbury *v.*Dougherty.—In error.

*Wednesday, July*23.

THE refusal to continue a cause on account of the absence of a witness, if the continuance be applied for on a sufficient affidavit, is error. *Vanblaricum*v. *Ward,*1 Blackf. 50.

The execution-defendant is a competent witness for the plaintiff, on a trial of the right of property. *Hankins et al.*v. *Ingols,*4 Blackf. 35.

*468The circumstance that a person has executed an appeal-bond in the name of the plaintiff and as his attorney in fact, in the case of an appeal from a justice’s judgment, does not render him incompetent as a witness for the plaintiff, on the trial of the cause in the Circuit Court.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 17, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JORGE TORRES-LARANEGA, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-2137

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-00889-MV-WDS)

(D.C. No. 2:03-CR-02112-MV-1)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, Chief Circuit Judge, and LUCERO and HOLMES, Circuit

Judges.

This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because no final or appealable

order has been entered by the district court. 

This court has jurisdiction to review only final decisions, 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and specific types of interlocutory orders not applicable here. A final decision is

one that “‘ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do

but execute the judgment.’” Cunningham v. Hamilton County, 527 U.S. 198, 204

(1999) (quoting Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517, 521-22 (1988)). An

order denying discovery is not immediately appealable. See S.E.C. v. Merrill

Appellate Case: 10-2137 Document: 01018443139 Date Filed: 06/17/2010 Page: 1
2

Scott & Associates, Ltd., 600 F.3d 1262, 1270 (10th Cir. 2010) (pretrial discovery

orders are generally not final or otherwise immediately appealable) (citing

Boughton v. Cotter Corp., 10 F.3d 746, 748 (10th Cir. 1993)).

Appeal DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-2137 Document: 01018443139 Date Filed: 06/17/2010 Page: 2
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*McDonald, Appellant.

(No. 6600

Decided February 11, 1946.)

*Mr. Robert J. Paul, Mr. Harry Meier*and *Mr. Ralph E. Gors,*for appellee.

*Mr. Wm. F. Hopkins,*for appellant.

By the Court.

Defendant, while seated in a parked automobile on a downtown street corner of Cincinnati, was arrested, charged, under an ordinance of the city of Cincinnati, with being a known thief, and convicted on that charge in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati.

The sole evidence introduced was a criminal record, showing a robbery conviction in 1931, convictions of loitering in 1929, probation on a charge of carrying concealed weapons in 1930, consorting in 1943, and a conviction in federal court for sending poison through the mails in 1943.

From the above record it .appears that there is no substantial evidence of thievery in recent years, which it is the object of the ordinance to suppress.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the Municipal Court, with instructions to discharge the defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*

Hildebrant, P. J., Matthews and Ross, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AIMS Worldwide, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick J. Summers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Patrick J. Summers

Patrick J. Summers

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      20,883,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,928,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,653
<INVENTORY>                                  2,033,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,474,034
<PP&E>                                      20,182,551
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,715,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,006,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,829,306
<BONDS>                                      5,393,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,461
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,782,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,006,768
<SALES>                                      3,325,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,999,129
<CGS>                                        4,320,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,337,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               164,287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,486,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,486,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,486,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.41)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           3,360,417
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          4,401,378
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      1,817
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               41,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,444,840
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         289,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               289,943
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        3,113,936
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              79,716
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              79,716
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        1,040,961
<NET-ASSETS>                    4,154,897
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   8,045
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    395,151
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (387,106)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           61,319
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>      (1,138,468)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>          (1,464,255)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>         (1,464,255)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>             118,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   397,001
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            4,887,025
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>               70.46
<PER-SHARE-NII>                    (18.18)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                 52.28
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      8.09

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: November 9, 2004
SATISFACTION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT
                       ----------------------------------

KNOW EVERYONE BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT

COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC.,

having a principal place of business located at 360 West 31st Street, New York,

New York 10001 does hereby certify that the following Security Agreement IS

PAID and satisfied and does hereby consent that the same be discharged of

record.

SECURITY AGREEMENT dated December 4, 1992 made by DATAFAST, INC., with a 

principal place of business located at 571A White Plains Road, Eastchester,

New York 10709 to COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC., with a principal place

of business located at 360 West 31st Street, New York, New York 10001.

Said Security Agreement being in the principal amount of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND

DOLLARS ($200,000.00) and which Security Agreement has not been assigned of

record.

Dated:      New York, New York
            March    , 1997
                                       COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC.

                                       By:    Zach Lonstein/Chairman
                                          --------------------------------
                                                 Name/Title
State of New York
County of New York

On the 16th day of April, 1997 before me personally came

to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at
and that he is the   Chairman        of COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC.,
the corporation foregoing instrument; that he knows the foregoing instrument; 
that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal corporate seal; that
it was so affixed that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of
said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order.


--------------------------------
Notary Public

Michael Carmody
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 02CA5024046
Qualified in Westchester County
Commission Expires Feb. 22, 1998
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 2010 of Sport Chalet, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.




Date:   August 6, 2010

/s/ Craig L. LevraChairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Howard K. KaminskyExecutive Vice President-Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sport Chalet, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2260 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2260

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 
in the calculation of medicare disproportionate share hospital payments 
                     for hospitals in Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2004

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 
in the calculation of medicare disproportionate share hospital payments 
                     for hospitals in Puerto Rico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare DSH Payments for Puerto 
Rico Hospitals Fairness Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. CALCULATION OF MEDICARE DSH PAYMENTS FOR PPS HOSPITALS IN 
              PUERTO RICO.

    Section 1886(d)(9)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(9)(D)(iii)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(iii) Subparagraph (F) (relating to disproportionate 
        share payments), except that for this purpose--
                    ``(I) the sum described in clause (ii) of this 
                subparagraph shall be substituted for the sum referred 
                to in paragraph (5)(F)(ii)(I); and
                    ``(II) for discharges occurring on or after October 
                1, 2004, subclause (I) of paragraph (5)(F)(vi) shall be 
                applied by substituting for the numerator described in 
                such subclause the number of a subsection (d) Puerto 
                Rico hospital's patient days for a cost reporting 
                period that are made up of patients who (for such days) 
                were entitled to benefits under part A of this title 
                and were recipients of aid under the State plan 
                approved under title XVI that provides for grants to 
                States for aid to the aged, blind, or disabled.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 623P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 447

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 18 December 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00677

- CV

Mark Sayers; Jennifer Sayers; Canyon Power Solutions, LLC; Power Solutions Group, LLC f/k/a Union Critical Power Solutions, LLC; Sayers Real Estate and Development, LLC; and Sayers C onstruction, LLC , Appellant s

v.

The City of Bryan, Texas, and Bryan Texas Utilities , Appellee s

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 19

- 2860 , THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIA M

Appe llant Sayers Construction LLC has filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. See

Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. We therefore abate this appeal until a party files a motion to reinstate or a

motion to sever. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8.3. Appel lant s are ordered to inform t his Court of the

resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding or some other event that would allow this appeal to be

reinstated. Should they fail to provide such notice, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for

want of prosecution on this Court’s or another party’s motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Bankr uptcy

Filed: January 13, 2023
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of ICOP Digital, Inc. on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-121219,
333-131038 and 33-131036) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-130856) of our report dated March 21, 2007 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Cordovano and Honeck, LLP
|Denver, Colorado             
|March 22, 2007
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATON OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, (the ”Report”), I, William P. Hales, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ William P. Hales


William P. Hales


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)














August 12, 2009





























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
QUANTUM 101 My NAME:

National Aeronautics and

Curious about quantum? Learn the basics of quantum physics
and how NASA plans to use quantum to communicate in space.

Space Administration

Everything physical around us is made of matter, from the air
we breathe to the water we drink — even our own bodies are
made of matter.

Atoms are an
example of matter,
and the basic
building blocks of
our world!

Atoms are made of even smaller units (or particles) of matter,
called electrons, protons and neutrons —which are made of
even smaller units of matter, called quarks.

Quantum physics is the
study of things that are
very, very small—the size
of an atom or smaller.

It is a branch of science
that investigates the nature}
of energy & matter...

..to make sense of the
smallest things in nature.

When sending important data, a

message is encrypted, or turned into

asecret code, & sent with decoding
keys to view the message.

In quantum physics, predictions are given
in terms of probability, which allows us to
find answers traditional computers can't.

This stops eavesdroppers from “listening in” &
stealing information. It is important to keep.
our keys safe & messages hidden.

When you are
using the intemet,
the data you send
online is
represented by
groups of the
numbers "0" and
“1", called bits. An
example of a bit is
“011001101.”

Superposition allows bits of data to be
represented as "Os" and “Is” at the same
time. These strings of data are called qubits.

Oy

Quantum communications
researchers at NASA use the
laws of quantum physics fo
safely send these keys using
superposition.

NASA's Space Communications and
Navigation program aims to use
quantum commications to securely

\ send & receive space data!

Lo

Visit www.nasa.gov/scan