alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68367-68368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, E -Learning Hazmat and Emergency 
Response.
    Date: December 7, 2010.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS, Keystone Bldg., 530 Davis Drive, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Janice B Allen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health 
Science, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30/Room 3170 B, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-7556.


[[Page 68368]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 29, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28070 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
August 1 3 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KERRY A. KILBURN AND CYNTHIA H. KILBURN , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 13

- 00011

- CV V.

FORT BEND CO UNTY DRAINAGE DISTRI CT , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Fort Bend County Drainage District, signed December 11, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedin gs in accordance with the court’ s opinion. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by ap pellee, Fort Bend County Drainage District.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40240 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ESTEBAN DEHOYO-MONCADA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1826-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Esteban Dehoyo-Moncada raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, John R. Christman, the Chief Executive Officer of FC BANC CORP., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FC BANC CORP..;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ John R. Christman  
|                        |  | John R. Christman      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph D. Sansone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph D. SansoneJoseph D. Sansone President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: February 5, 2004
EXHIBIT 23.1

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Registration Statement of ICOP Digital, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-121219, 333-131038 and 333-131036) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-130856) of our report dated March 20, 2008 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Cordovano and Honeck LLP
|Englewood, Colorado         
|March 20, 2009
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Addendum (the  "Addendum") is made effective as of the 15th day of
December,  1999 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and Jan R.  Van  Gorder
effective as of December 16, 1997.

         WHEREAS,  the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of March
9,  1999  agreed  to extend  the term of the  Agreement  for a period of one (1)
additional  year which  extended the term of the Agreement to expire on December
15, 2000 instead of December 15, 1999; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of  Directors  of the  Company  at its  meeting  of
December  14, 1999 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

         1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with  respect  to the  Term is hereby
amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2001.

         2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.

ATTEST:                                              ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/ Mark T. Torok                         By: /s/ F.William Hirt
    Mark T. Torok                                 F. William Hirt
     Assistant Secretary                           Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/ Sheila M. Hirsch                          /s/ Jan R. Van Gorder
    Sheila M. Hirsch                              Jan R. Van Gorder
     Executive Secretary                          6796 Manchester Beach Rd.
                                                  Fairview, PA   16415

                                       70
**Amendment
      to the Company’s Articles of Association:**





**Article
      45 (d) will be deleted and replaced with the following:**





**Article
      45(d):**




Subject
      to the Companies Law, any natural person may act as an Alternate
      Director.





**Article
      70(c) will be deleted and replaced with the following:**





**Article
      70(c):**





“The
      Company may, to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law, indemnify
      an
      Office Holder in respect of an obligation or expense specified below imposed
      on
      the Office Holder in respect of an act performed in his capacity as an Office
      Holder, as follows:





(i)  a
      financial obligation imposed on him in favor of another person by a court
      judgment, including a compromise judgment or an arbitrator's award approved
      by
      court;





(ii)  reasonable
      litigation expenses, including attorney’s fees, expended by the Office Holder as
      a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him by a competent
      authority, provided that such investigation or proceeding concluded without
      the
      filing of an indictment against him and either (A) concluded without the
      imposition of any financial liability in lieu of criminal proceedings or (B)
      concluded with the imposition of a financial liability in lieu of criminal
      proceedings but relates to a criminal offense that does not require proof of
      criminal intent; and





(iii)  reasonable
      litigation expenses, including attorneys' fees, expended by an Office Holder
      or
      charged to the Office Holder by a court, in a proceeding instituted against
      the
      Office Holder by the Company or on its behalf or by another person, or in a
      criminal charge from which the Office Holder was acquitted, or in a criminal
      proceeding in which the Office Holder was convicted of an offense that does
      not
      require proof of criminal intent.





The
      Company may undertake to indemnify an Office Holder as aforesaid, (aa)
      prospectively, provided that, in respect of Article 70(c)(i), the undertaking
      is
      limited to events which in the opinion of the Board of Directors are foreseeable
      in light of the Company’s actual operations when the undertaking to indemnify is
      given, and to an amount or criteria set by the Board of Directors as reasonable
      under the circumstances, and further
      provided that such events and amount or criteria are set forth in the
      undertaking to indemnify, and (bb)
      retroactively.”
#### WHALEY v. WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUS., INC.

No. 359P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 88

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1718 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1718

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2003

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JAMES B. PEARSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Senator James B. Pearson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator 
James B. Pearson Post Office.

            Passed the Senate October 29, 2003.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Our audits include the financial statement schedule in Item 14(a). This schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Water Pik Technologies, Inc. pertaining to the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-30016), Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-96447), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96449), Teledyne, Inc. 401(k)
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96451), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96455), Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-96457) and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96457) of
our report dated January 28, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland Hills, California
March 28, 2000
#### Steven Isaac TROTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YORK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; Bruce Bryant, Sheriff; John Short, Chief; Ralph Misle, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-6901.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Steven Isaac Trotman, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*272PER CURIAM.

Steven Isaac Trotman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the merits of this appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Trotman v. York County Detention Ctr.,*No. CA-03-438-0-13BD (D.S.C. May 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.18

                             CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT
                             ---------------------

Date:  1/st/ October 1999


Parties:

1.   "The Company": Octel Corp. a limited liability company incorporated in the
     State of Delaware, USA and having its European Headquarters at Global
     House, Bailey Lane, Manchester M90 4AA, UK; and

2.   "The Consultant":  Dr R E Bew of Ivy Cottage, 106 The High Street, Norton,
     Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, TS20 1DS.


Recitals:

(A)  The Company wishes to retain the Consultant to assist the Company by
     providing corporate development services.

(B)  The Consultant has experience and expertise in corporate development
     activities and is willing to provide those services to the Company on the
     terms of this agreement.


                               A G R E E M E N T

1.   Appointment
     -----------

     The Company appoints the Consultant to provide the following services to
     the Company:

1.1  develop the Company's international business profile;

1.2  develop senior level relationships for the Company with the banking
     community and the major companies in the chemical industry;

1.3  assist the Corporate Development team to develop, review and implement the
     Company's M&A programme;

1.4  develop a corporate KPI programme;

1.5  assist in the development of the N.W. Inter-active programme.

2.   Terms
     -----

     This agreement shall commence on 1/st/ October 1999 and shall continue
     until terminated by either party giving three months notice in writing.


                                       1
<PAGE>

3.   Consultant's Obligations
     ------------------------

     The Consultant shall devote such time to the provision of the services
     described in paragraph 1 hereof as is necessary to fulfil those obligations
     but the Company and Consultant expect that the Consultant shall provide
     such services to the Company on an average of two days per week.

4.   Fees
     ----

     The Company shall pay to the Consultant (Pounds)15,000 per calendar quarter
     for the terms of this agreement.

5.   Consultant Status
     -----------------

     The Consultant is an independent contractor and not a servant of the
     Company.  The services will be provided by the Consultant as a self-
     employed person and nothing in this agreement shall be construed as
     creating an employer/employee relationship.  The Consultant is not eligible
     for sickness benefit, to join the Company Pension Scheme or receive any
     holiday pay or bonus payments.

6.   Governing Law and Jurisdiction
     ------------------------------

     The construction, validity and performance of this Agreement shall be
     governed by the laws of England and Wales and both parties submit to the
     non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.



SIGNED by _______________________________
for and on behalf of
Octel Corp.



SIGNED by _______________________________
The Consultant

                                       2
# 			Black History Month		

## 			News & Articles		

See All News

Article5 Min Read
Lakita Lowe: Leading Space Commercialization Innovations and Fostering STEM Engagement 

Article4 Min Read
Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Clayton Turner

Article8 Min Read
Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Matthew Hayes
Article6 Min Read
Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Brittny McGraw

## 					Multimedia				

					Go To Galleries				

				Go To Galleries			

## 			Discover More Topics From NASA		

								SCaN News							

								Research Programs							

								Flight Programs							

								Apollo 1 Resources