alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

988 TP 11-00646 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND GENISE BENSON, PETITIONERS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NANCY POTENZA DESIGN & BUILDING SERVICES, INC., ROCCO POTENZA, INDIVIDUALLY, HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF WESTERN NEW YORK, POTENZA SERVICES INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST, AND POTENZA SERVICE, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST, RESPONDENTS.

CAROLINE J. DOWNEY, BRONX (TONI ANN HOLLIFIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS.

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Erie County [Joseph R. Glownia, J.], entered January 4, 2011) to enforce a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is granted.

Memorandum: Petitioner New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) commenced this proceeding for judicial review and enforcement of an order pursuant to Executive Law § 298 finding that respondent Nancy Potenza Design & Building Services, Inc. was liable, as the complainant’s employer, of aiding and abetting the sexual harassment of the complainant. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarded the complainant $10,000 in compensatory damages based on a hostile work environment claim and the Commissioner of SDHR (Commissioner) adopted the recommended order of the ALJ. We conclude that there is substantial evidence supporting the determination ( see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights , 45 NY2d 176, 181- 182).

The fact that the sexual harassment did not take place on the employer’s premises does not relieve the employer of liability under the Human Rights Law (Executive Law art 15; see Lockard v Pizza Hut
, 162 F3d 1062). Additionally, respondent Rocco Potenza, as the owner and president of the employer who condoned the sexual harassment, may be held individually liable for the discriminatory actions that damaged the complainant ( see Patrowich v Chemical Bank , 63 NY2d 541,-2- 988 TP 11-00646
542). Finally, we conclude that the amount of the award is reasonably related to the wrongdoing and is supported by the evidence before the Commissioner ( see Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights , 265 AD2d 809).

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Vivacqua, certify that:

1.  I  have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of KIWI Network Solutions
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

January 31, 2005
 /s/ Robert Vivacqua
-------------------------------
Robert Vivacqua,
Acting Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Ronald N., Respondent. Verna Eggleston, Respondent. Park City, LLC, Nonparty Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 181]

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the person and property of Ronald N., an alleged incapacitated person, Park City, LLC, appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated September 12, 2003, as stayed its execution of a warrant of eviction against Ronald N. for a period of 60 days following the appointment and qualification of a guardian.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the alleged incapacitated person has vacated the apartment for which the appellant landlord obtained a warrant of eviction, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. The matter does not qualify as an exception to the mootness doctrine (see *Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,015
<SECURITIES>                                     4,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,718
<PP&E>                                           8,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,177
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,948
<SALES>                                          5,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,975
<CGS>                                              751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 July 11, 2023 Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Brooke Owens 

Fellowship Reception/Dinner on July 13, 2023

On July 13, 2023, Brooke Owens Fellowship, a nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the 

Internal Revenue Code, will host a dinner at the Marriott - Crystal City and Reagan National 

Airport, Washington, DC, 6:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. The event is to honor the 2023 Class of Brooke 

Owens and Patti Grace Smith Fellows (collegiate aerospace students who have been selected for 

summer internship program). 

Approximately 180 people have been invited to attend the dinner reception. Attendees will have 

a diversity of views or interests and will include representatives of the legislative branch, 

personnel from academia, industry representatives, employees of Federal agencies, members of 

the public, and media. The estimated value of the event, including all food is $68 per person 

(with additional $25 for wine/beer). Brooke Owens Fellowship is in control of the all the 

organizing, planning and invitations for the event. 

Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various 

NASA programs. There is also an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend these 

events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views 

pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g). 

Accordingly, NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the 

interests of the NAA—including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989—may accept an invitation from the NAA 

for free attendance for themselves and a guest to this event. In those circumstances, I find that 

the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may 

appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties. 
2

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the Brooke Owens Fellowship, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, or who receive an invitation from a party 

other than the event host, NAA, should seek a separate determination from their local NASA 

ethics office as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual 

situation.

Adam F. Greenstone
#### MARGARITA MANSILLA v. CAESARS BOARDWALK REGENCY HOTEL AND CASINO.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
April 14, 1988

No. 87-6787 (A-797).

#### Clanton *v.*Muncy, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, *Gregg*v. *Georgia,*428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant the application for stay of execution and the petition for writ of certiorari and would vacate the death sentence in this case.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46008, 333-66434, 333-113692, 333-117003, and 333-137458), Form S-3 (Nos. 333-167981, 333-110067, 333-102436, 333-76144, 333-115245, 333-115247, and 333-118823), and Form SB-2/Amended on Form S-3 (No. 333-47240) and related prospectuses of our report dated March 9, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K.





Miami, Florida
/s/ BDO USA, LLPMarch 9, 2011
Certified Public Accountants
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2101 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2101

  To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize additional 
 appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park in the State of 
                               Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 23, 2004

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize additional 
 appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park in the State of 
                               Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) Matching Funds.--Section 8(b) of Public Law 102-543 (16 U.S.C. 
410yy-7(b)) is amended by striking ``$4'' and inserting ``$1''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10 of Public Law 102-
543 (16 U.S.C. 410yy-9) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$50,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$25,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$100,000'' and 
        inserting ``$250,000''.
                                 <all>
```
X-59

Want to learn more about the X-59? Go to: https://www.nasa.gov/specials/Quesst/

• El X-59 volará a una velocidad supersónica (más rápido que la velocidad del sonido).

• El X-59 está diseñado para que su explosión o auge sónico sea más silencioso que en otros 

aeroplanos supersónicos.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Código de 

aprobación de 

vuelo:

SCOLP59
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,686,673
<SECURITIES>                                 1,238,905
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,546,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                   296,440
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,900,224
<PP&E>                                       7,827,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,369,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,112,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,950,773
<BONDS>                                         27,069<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,379
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,851,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,112,021
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,375,499
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,680,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,726,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               103,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,194,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,224,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,969,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,969,546
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<FN>
<F1>ALL CURRENT
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

Name of Subsidiary

State/Country of IncorporationWholly-owned Direct SubsidiariesB&B Advertising, Inc.

DelawareMIVA Direct, Inc.

DelawareMIVA Small Business Solutions, Inc.

DelawareWho Midco Corporation

DelawareWholly-owned Indirect SubsidiariesMIVA Media International, Inc.

DelawareMIVA (UK) Ltd.

United KingdomEspotting Media Ireland Ltd.

IrelandEspotting Scandinavia AB

SwedenMIVA (France) S.a.r.l

FranceMIVA Media S.L.

SpainMIVA (Deutschland) GmbH

GermanyMIVA (Italia) S.r.l.a socio unico

Italy


1

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 8.1



List of Subsidiaries



|Particulars                                 |  | Country of incorporation |  | 2017 (%) |     |  | 2016 (%) |  |     | 2015 (%) | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------- | --- |  | -------- |  | --- | -------- | 
|Sify Technologies (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.     |  | Singapore                |  |          | 100 |  |          |  | 100 |          | 
|Sify Technologies North America Corporation |  | United States            |  |          | 100 |  |          |  | 100 |          | 
|Sify Data and Managed Services Limited      |  | India                    |  |          | 100 |  |          |  | -   |          |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63  Of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the periodic report of MIVA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter A. Corrao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|/s/PETER A. CORRAOChief Executive Officer, MIVA, Inc. |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2017-04-13 11:51:11","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"5"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["AFRC","ARC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["2","9","7","30","133","18","43","20","13","12","11"," ","11","4"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["3","6","9","30","106","16","35","18","12","11","4"," ","10","2"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "," ","2","1","8"," ","6","3"," "," "," "," ","1"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q2"}