alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2347

    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
  permanently authorize the public school and private school tuition 
             assistance programs established under the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2004

     Mr. Voinovich (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Jeffords, and Mr. 
  Lieberman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
  permanently authorize the public school and private school tuition 
             assistance programs established under the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Public School Program.--Section 3(i) of the District of 
Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38--2702(i), D.C. Official 
Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five succeeding fiscal 
years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal year''.
    (b) Private School Program.--Section 5(f) of such Act (sec. 38--
2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five 
succeeding fiscal years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal 
year''.
                                 <all>
```
#### FINKLEY v. FAULKNER

No. 374P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 715

Petition by respondent (Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

p1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147347

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147347

COA: 312636

Wayne CC: 09-007033-FH

LENNIE JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                      IMNET SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                         ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   ADDITIONS
                                                            -----------------------
                                             BALANCE AT     CHARGED TO                                  BALANCE
                                              BEGINNING      COSTS AND      OTHER       DEDUCTIONS     AT END OF
           DESCRIPTION                        OF PERIOD       EXPENSES     DESCRIBE      DESCRIBE       PERIOD
------------------------------------         ----------     ----------     --------     ----------     ---------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>      
Year ended June 30, 1997 - allowance
for doubtful accounts ....................   $  333,290       557,754     237,208(2)     12,612(1)     1,115,640

Quarter ended September 30, 1997 -
Allowance for doubtful accounts ..........   $1,115,640       326,457          --            --        1,442,097

Quarter ended December 31, 1997 -
Allowance for doubtful accounts ..........   $1,442,097       306,335          --            --        1,748,432

Quarter ended March 31, 1998 -
Allowance for doubtful accounts ..........   $1,748,432       609,350          --            --        2,357,782
</TABLE>

(1)  Accounts deemed to be uncollectible and written off during the period.
(2)  Allowance for doubtful accounts of subsidiary at acquisition date.







                                    Page 22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marcia Austin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03687-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8310 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8310 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Kohl, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Daniel J. KohlDaniel J. KohlPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: February 8, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1679 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1679

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
                   recovery period for roof systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2003

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
                   recovery period for roof systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Realistic Roofing Tax Treatment Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR ROOF SYSTEMS.

    (a) 20-Year Recovery Period.--Paragraph (3) of section 168(e) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of 
certain property) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) 20-year property.--The term `20-year 
                property' includes any roof system.''.
    (b) Requirement To Use Straight Line Method.--Paragraph (3) of 
section 168(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(G) Any roof system.''.
    (c) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

  ``(F)..............................................       20''.      
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

April 10, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Planet Labs 

PBC Reception on April 13, 2023

On April 13, 2023, Planet Labs PBC will host a reception at the National Air and Space 

Museum, 600 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20560, from 7:00 to 10:00 p.m. 

The reception and celebration will be a follow up of our annual customer conference 

“Explore” and will provide opportunity for those present to network with industry, 

government officials, and academia to reflect on the conference theme “From Transparency to 

Action”. Planet Labs is in control of all the arrangements and invitations for the event. 

Approximately 650 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, from federal 

agencies, and from industry. The estimated value of the event, including all food and drink, is 

approximately $40 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to 

exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). I 

further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event 

because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views 

pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest (if invited) to 

the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs 

any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the 

performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are 

required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only attend the event if 

they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event.

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of Planet Labs, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 
2

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are 

reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2018

No. 04-17-00808-CV

Daniel CRISP,

Appellant

v.

Ismael CLAY,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI10107

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File the Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is

extended to January 9, 2019.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE
TRUSTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5
<PP&E>                                          87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,523
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### VOJTECH DANO v. MARIA SZOMBATHY.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Concludes Wind Study","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RZzTwDJ0JG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-concludes-wind-study\/\">NASA Concludes Wind Study<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-concludes-wind-study\/embed\/#?secret=RZzTwDJ0JG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Concludes Wind Study” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RZzTwDJ0JG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/afrc2023-0135-17.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID PAUL HEALY, 

 Appellant,

v.

SIMONE BARRON,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00027-CV

Appeal from the

352nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 352-286480-16)

O R D E R

This Court has received and filed the United States Bankruptcy Court’s suggestion of 

bankruptcy stating that Appellee, Simon Barron, has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the 

Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, any further action in this appeal is automatically 

stayed. Under these circumstances, and for administrative purposes, it is ORDERED that this 

appeal is removed from the Court’s docket and abated. The appeal will be reinstated upon proper 

motion showing that the stay has been lifted and specifying the action required by this Court.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brenda H. Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MainStreet BankShares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision; to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) N/A

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d ) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrantis internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: 03/06/07 |  |  |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith                                                 
|               |  |  |  | Brenda H. Smith                                                     
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer Corporate Secretary



51