alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2277 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2277

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 
arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 
        within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN 
              RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2(c) of the Act of November 2, 1966 (25 
U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``Any lease'' and all that follows 
                through ``affecting land'' and inserting ``Any 
                contract, including a lease, affecting land''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such lease or contract'' and 
                inserting ``such contract''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such leases or 
        contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts'' and inserting 
        ``Such contracts''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the Indian Tribal Economic Development and 
Contract Encouragement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-179).

            Passed the Senate July 19, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2277

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 
arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 
        within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance Companies, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred W. Wagenhals, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Fred W. WagenhalsFred W. Wagenhals
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005
 28
#### Sakina Willis et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants.

[789 NYS2d 223]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated April 9, 2003, as denied that branch of their motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that none of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Edward Singleton and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted by that plaintiff.

The defendants relied upon the medical records of the plaintiffs Sakina Willis and Emma Washington and medical reports of their physicians in support of those branches of their *697motion which were, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by those plaintiffs. Those records failed to establish, as a matter of law, that neither Willis nor Washington sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, we need not consider the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposition to those branches of the motion *(see Mangum v Trabulsi,*294 AD2d 472, 473 [2002]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendants’ motion *(see Taccetta v Scotto,*287 AD2d 707, 709 [2001]).

The affirmed medical report submitted by the defendants in support of that branch of their motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Edward Singleton established the defendants’ prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on that branch of their motion *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]; *Grant v Heli Trucker,*294 AD2d 538, 539 [2002]). The defendants’ examining physician examined Singleton approximately IV2 years after the accident. He reported his findings with respect to the various ranges of motion of Singleton’s cervical and lumbar spines and shoulders, and found no tenderness or muscle spasm. Additionally, the neurological examination was normal, and other tests performed showed no abnormalities. The examining physician opined that Singleton had no disability. In opposition, the medical evidence submitted by the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Carroll v Jennings,*264 AD2d 494, 495 [1999]; *Kauderer v Penta,*261 AD2d 365, 366 [1999]). H. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Ritter, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Space Operations 

Mission Directorate

Chief, Safety and Mission 

Assurance 

Kennedy Space 

Center

Marshall Space 

Flight Center 

Langley Research 

Center

Johnson Space 

Center

Armstrong Flight 

Research Center

Goddard Space 

Flight Center

Glenn Research 

Center

Ames Research 

Center

Administrator

Deputy Administrator*

Associate Administrator

Chief of Staff

Deputy Associate Administrator

Chief Engineer

Chief Health and Medical 

Officer

Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer

Diversity and Equal 

Opportunity 

Legislative and 

Intergovernmental Affairs 

International and 

Interagency Relations 

STEM Engagement

Communications

Advisory Groups

NAC and ASAP

Inspector General 

Chief Human Capital Officer Strategic Infrastructure

Procurement NASA Shared Services Center

Protective Services 

Aeronautics 

Research Mission 

Directorate 

Exploration Systems 

Development 

Mission Directorate

Science Mission 

Directorate 

Office of Technology, 

Policy, & Strategy

Mission Support 

Directorate

Jet Propulsion 

Laboratory*** 

Small Business 

Programs 

Stennis Space Center

NASA Office of JPL 

Management & 

Oversight ** 

Chief Scientist / Senior 

Climate Advisor

Space Technology 

Mission Directorate

General Counsel

Reporting Structure

Administrator Deputy 

Administrator

Associate 

Administrator

Deputy AA for 

Business Operations

Note: Administrator may delegate direct reports to Deputy Administrator at his/her discretion.

* Deputy Administrator designated as Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO).

** NOJMO oversees the Jet Propulsion Laboratory contract.

*** Programmatic reporting to the Science Mission Directorate Associate Administrator. 

www.nasa.gov JPL is a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). May 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 220 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 37
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 220

                          [Report No. 108-22]

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2003

Mr. Fitzgerald introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                             March 19, 2003

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11214, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section--
            (1) reinstate the license for the construction of the 
        project as of the effective date of the surrender of the 
        license; and
            (2) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of the project for 3 
        consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years 
        after the date of issuance of the license.

                                                        Calendar No. 37

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 220

                          [Report No. 108-22]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 19, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Export Control Reform -

Avoiding Unilateral Export Controls in Support of Space Policy Directive 2 

and the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act 

2018-03-02 (RPC-02) 

Recommendation: 

Per the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act [1]

, when asked to review export control licenses or 

Commodity Jurisdiction Requests, NASA should strive to avoid unilateral controls whenever 

possible. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

Unilateral export controls hurt both the economy and national security. Per Space Policy 

Directive 2 (SPD 2), NASA should eliminate counterproductive regulatory burdens. Moreover, the 

2018 National Defense Authorization Act requires that the application of unilateral controls should be 

limited to protecting specific national security and foreign policy interests. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Failing to act on this recommendation will perpetuate obsolete export control policies that will raise 

NASA's costs while reducing the Agency's capabilities. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs, but notes that the Agency has a limited role in reviewing export license applications 

or Commodity Jurisdiction requests. NASA favors multilateral controls on sensitive technologies as 

these are a more effective means oflimiting the spread of these technologies as the controls would be 

enforced by all supplying countries. Foreign availability of a product and the lack of multilateral 

controls on a specific commodity are always relevant factors and are taken into consideration before 

NASA issues a recommendation to State Department and Commerce Department decision-makers. 

[1] Export Control Reform Act as P.L. 115-232 §1752(6) : "Export controls applied unilaterally to items widely available 

from foreign sources generally are less effective in preventing end-users from acquiring those items. Application of 

unilateral export controls should be limited for purposes of protecting specific United States national security and foreign 

policy interests. " 

Enclosure
#### STATE v. HAYWOOD

No. 416P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 223

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 August 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
# STS-38 crewmembers pose on OV-104’s middeck for onboard crew portrait

STS038-28-016 (20 Nov 1990) --- STS-38 crewmembers pose on Atlantis', Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 104's, middeck for traditional onboard (in-space) portrait. Wearing red, yellow, and orange crew polo shirts are (right to left) Mission Specialist (MS) Robert C. Springer, Pilot Frank L. Culbertson, Commander Richard O. Covey, MS Charles D. Gemar, and MS Carl J. Meade.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s38-28-016/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 20, 1990ProducerJSCSize1920x1258pxPIA Numbers38-28-016The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Malden, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|  
(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 
 
 
(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
/s/  NICHOLAS MALDEN

 
 
 
  
**Nicholas Malden Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary November 14, 2002**

  
This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

24 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION, INC. v. WILLIAM P. VERDON, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF TARSI POLYCHRONIS.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

Calendar No. 636

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2249

[Report No. 108–308] 

To amend the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act to provide 

for emergency food and shelter. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2004

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JULY 15, 2004

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL

To amend the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance 

Act to provide for emergency food and shelter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Food and 

5 Shelter Act of 2004’’. 
2

•S 2249 RS 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless 

3 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

7 this title $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $170,000,000 

8 for fiscal year 2006, and $180,000,000 for fiscal year 

9 2007.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. NAME CHANGE TO NOMINATING ORGANIZATION. 

11 Section 301(b) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless 

12 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331(b)) is amended by strik13 ing paragraph (5) and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(5) United Jewish Communities.’’. 

15 SEC. 4. PARTICIPATION OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS ON 

16 LOCAL BOARDS. 

17 Section 316(a) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless 

18 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11346(a)) is amended by strik19 ing paragraph (6) and inserting the following: 

20 ‘‘(6) guidelines requiring each local board to in21 clude in their membership not less than 1 homeless 

22 individual, former homeless individual, homeless ad23 vocate, or recipient of food or shelter services, except 

24 that such guidelines may waive the requirement of 

25 this paragraph for any board that is unable to meet 

26 such requirement if the board otherwise consults 
3

•S 2249 RS 

1 with homeless individuals, former homeless individ2 uals, homeless advocates, or recipients of food or 

3 shelter services.’’. 
Calendar No. 636

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2249

[Report No. 108–308] 

A BILL

To amend the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Asshelter. sistance Act to provide for emergency food and 

JULY 15, 2004

Reported without amendment
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALVIN LEE MATHIS.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### In the Matter of Keith Townes, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 855]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate, was required to submit to a urinalysis test after correction officials suspected he was using drugs based on information provided by a confidential source. After the results of the test came back positive for the presence of opiates, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the posi*755tive urinalysis test results and the testimony received at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Dalton v Selsky,*6 AD3d 844, 845 [2004]; *Matter of Velez v Selsky,*6 AD3d 783 [2004]). Annulment of the determination is not warranted based on petitioner’s claim that the reliability of the individual who supplied the confidential information was not properly established. We note that the determination was not based on such confidential information and, in any event, the correction officer who received it testified that he had previously obtained information from the subject individual which was reliable. Moreover, petitioner’s defense that false positive test results were caused by certain over-the-counter medications he was taking was refuted by the testimony of the SYVA representative and the facility nurse (see *Matter of Byas v Goord,*272 AD2d 800, 800 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 765 [2000]; *Matter of Rodriguez v Coombe,*249 AD2d 655, 655 [1998]). Furthermore, there is no merit to petitioner’s claim that he was improperly denied the right to call certain witnesses. While the Hearing Officer denied the testimony of one correction officer, his testimony was irrelevant to the charge against petitioner *(see Matter of Alexander v Goord,*3 AD3d 638 [2004]). In addition, the record reveals that the Hearing Officer was compelled to terminate the testimony of two other witnesses after petitioner became argumentative. We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims, to the extent they are properly before us, and find them to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2085 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2085

To modify the requirements of the land conveyance to the University of 
                Nevada at Las Vegas Research Foundation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2004

 Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the requirements of the land conveyance to the University of 
                Nevada at Las Vegas Research Foundation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``University of Nevada at Las Vegas 
Research Foundation Reinvestment Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA AT LAS VEGAS RESEARCH 
              FOUNDATION.

    Section 702(b)(2) of Public Law 107-282 (116 Stat. 2013) is amended 
by striking ``that if the land'' and all that follows through 
``conveyed by the Foundation.'' and inserting the following: ``that 
provides that (except in a case in which the gross proceeds of a sale, 
lease, or conveyance are provided to the Foundation to carry out the 
purposes for which the Foundation was established), if the land 
described in paragraph (3) is sold, leased, or otherwise conveyed by 
the Foundation--''.
                                 <all>
```