alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (File No. 333-53600) on Form S-8 of *MutualFirst*Financial, Inc.'s 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan and 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of ourreport dated February 4, 2005 of our audits of the consolidated financial statements of *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the periodended December 31, 2004, and of our report dated March 25, 2005 on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are included in *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc.'s amended annual report on Form 10-K/A forthe year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, IndianaMay 31, 2005**
#### STEPHEN A. HEFFNER, v. JOEL E. JACOBSON.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*299)
#### MARGAREET BAKELY v. BURLINGTON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24221]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (14-097)]


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Research License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Research License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 
37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant 
an exclusive, research only license in the United States to evaluate 
the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent Application No. 13/
895,717, NASA Case No. KSC-13579, entitled ``Treatment System and 
Method for Removing Halogenated Compounds from Contaminated Systems,'' 
to Etana, LLC, having its principal place of business at 424 Copeland 
Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32235. The patent rights in these 
inventions have been assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. The prospective exclusive, research only license will 
comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective exclusive research license may be granted 
unless, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published 
notice, NASA receives written objections including evidence and 
argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 
Competing applications completed and received by NASA within fifteen 
(15) days of the date of this published notice will also be treated as 
objections to the grant of the contemplated exclusive, research only 
license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be 
submitted to Patent Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Mail Code CC-
A, NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 
32899. Telephone: 321-867-2076; Facsimile: 321-867-1817.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley Ford, Patent Counsel, Office 
of the Chief Counsel, Mail Code CC-A, NASA John F. Kennedy Space 
Center, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899. Telephone: 321-867-2076; 
Facsimile: 321-867-1817. Information about other NASA inventions 
available for licensing can be found online at http://technology.nasa.gov/.

Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24221 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1991

To require the reimbursement of members of the Armed Forces or their 

family members for the costs of protective body armor purchased by 

or on behalf of members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2003

Mr. DASCHLE (for Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY)) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To require the reimbursement of members of the Armed 

Forces or their family members for the costs of protective body armor purchased by or on behalf of members 

of the Armed Forces.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF PROTECTIVE 

4 BODY ARMOR PURCHASED BY OR ON BEHALF 

5 OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) REIMBURSEMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

7 the military department concerned shall reimburse a mem8 ber of the Armed Forces, or a family member of a member 
2

•S 1991 IS 

1 of the Armed Forces, for the cost of protective body armor 

2 that was purchased by such member of the Armed Forces 

3 or family member, by or on behalf of such member of the 

4 Armed Forces, for the use of such member of the Armed 

5 Forces in wartime conditions. 

6 (b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Amounts available to 

7 the military departments shall be available for the reim8 bursements authorized by subsection (a).

Æ
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Randy Buchamer,
Chief Executive Officer of Voice Mobility International, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    
          the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Voice Mobility International, Inc. for the
          year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Voice Mobility
          International, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2005

/s/ Randy BuchamerRandy Buchamer Chief
Executive Officer, Voice Mobility International, Inc.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Voice Mobility
International, Inc. and will be retained by Voice Mobility International, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,150
<SECURITIES>                                    50,896
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    780,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,272,446
<PP&E>                                          55,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,326,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,081,768
<BONDS>                                          6,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     238,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,326,793
<SALES>                                         22,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,121
<CGS>                                           29,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,341
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,336
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GABRIELLA JIMENEZ, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-5158

(D.C. No. 4:10-CR-00100-JHP-2)

(N.D. Okla.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 18, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-5158 Document: 01019432204 Date Filed: 05/18/2015 Page: 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VERNARD WILLIAMS.

May 22, 1984.

Certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to permit defendant to present appropriate defenses, including that of double jeopardy, at the resentencing hearing directed by the Appellate Division (see, for example, *State v. Farr,*183 *N.J.Super.*463 (App.Div.1982)); and it is further

ORDERED that, as a part of its consideration of this matter, the trial court shall determine what notice, if any, was given to defendant or his attorney regarding the State’s intention to appeal and whether such notice complied with the requirements of *R.*2:9 — 3(d).

Jurisdiction is not retained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM COLANDREA.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               371,400
<PP&E>                                       1,025,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               (175,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,002,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          492,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,002,200
<SALES>                                        443,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,900
<CGS>                                          361,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2241

AN ACT

To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition

programs through June 30, 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2241 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN MILITARY HOUSING

2 ALLOWANCES.

3 Section 9(b)(7) of the Richard B. Russell National

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(7)) is amended by

5 striking ‘‘March 31, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30,

6 2004’’.

7 SEC. 2. CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM.

8 Section 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Richard B. Russell Na9 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) is

10 amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2004’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘June 30, 2004’’.

12 SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES UNDER COMMODITY

13 DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS.

14 Section 15(e) of the Commodity Distribution Reform

15 Act and WIC Amendments of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 612c note;

16 Public Law 100–237) is amended by striking ‘‘April 1,

17 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2004’’.

18 SEC. 4. FUNDING MAINTENANCE OF COMMODITY DIS19 TRIBUTION PROGRAMS.

20 Section 14(a) of the Richard B. Russell National

21 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1762a(a)) is amended by

22 striking ‘‘March 31, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30,

23 2004’’.

24 SEC. 5. SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN.

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 13(q) of the Richard B.

26 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(q))
†

3

S 2241 ES

1 is amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2004’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘June 30, 2004’’.

3 (b) PILOT PROJECTS.—Section 18(f)(2) of the Rich4 ard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C.

5 1769(f)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2004’’ and

6 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’.

Passed the Senate March 26, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2241

AN ACT

To reauthorize certain school lunch and child

nutrition programs through June 30, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRESH CHOICE
INC'S REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 14,1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-14-1998
<CASH>                                             318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,587
<PP&E>                                          47,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,984)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,170
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,050
<SALES>                                         33,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,558
<CGS>                                            8,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,114)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)

<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THE EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2000 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
                                 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER 
              RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2003'' and inserting ``2005''.

            Passed the Senate December 9, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
                                 years.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 9, 2007
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Avici



|(a) |  | Avici Systems International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | Avici Systems Europe B.V., a Dutch limited liability company
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



|(c) |  | Avici Systems France sarl, a French limited liability company
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) |  | Avici Systems Germany GmbH, a German limited liability company
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



|(e) |  | Avici Systems Texas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------



|(f) |  | Avici Systems Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------



|(g) |  | Avici Systems KK, a Japanese corporation
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
No. 87-6501.

#### La Rue *v.*McCarthy et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50593

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH DANIEL CROSBY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 6:04-CR-25-ALL

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Joseph Crosby, Jr., federal prisoner # 36119-180, pleaded guilty of possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of crack cocaine within 1,000

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-50593 Document: 00511276410 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
No. 08-50593

feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 860. He moves for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal from an order granting his pro

se 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction based on the retroactive

amendment to the crack cocaine guideline.

By moving for IFP, Crosby is challenging the district court’s certification

that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197,

202 (5th Cir. 1997). Crosby, however, asserts only that he is entitled to proceed

IFP on appeal because he is a pauper; he makes no argument that his appeal involves any nonfrivolous issue. Because of his failure to brief them, he has abandoned his district-court claims and any challenge to the district court’s certification. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1983); Brinkmann

v. Dallas Cnty. Sheriff Abner, 813 F.3d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

The appeal lacks any issue of arguable merit. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. It is therefore DISMISSED as frivolous. Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24. Crosby’s motion for appointment of counsel is likewise DENIED.

2

Case: 08-50593 Document: 00511276410 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)

PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
Alfred G. Merriweather, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monogram Biosciences, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2007                          
|                                              
|/s/ Alfred G. Merriweather                    
|Alfred G. Merriweather Chief Financial
Officer
NASA Organization Chart

AD