alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Kevin M Gagne, Chief Executive Officer of Empire Financial Holding
Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Empire Financial Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report and based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

 Date: April 13, 2004

 /s/ Kevin M. Gagne
 ------------------
 Kevin M. Gagne, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Avici**

 

(a) Avici Securities Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

 

(b) Avici Systems International, Inc., aDelaware Corporation 

 

(c) Avici Systems EuropeB.V., a Dutch limited liability company 

 

(d)Avici Systems France sarl, a French limited liability company 

 

(e) Avici Systems Germany GmbH, a German limited liability company 

 

(f) Avici Systems Texas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation 

 

(g) Avici Systems Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership 

 

(h) Avici Systems Business Trust, a Massachusetts Business Trust 

 

(i) Avici Systems KK, a Japanese corporation
2 min read

# Mechanics of Digital Lattice Materials for Re-configurable Space Structures

### Loura Hall

Jul 19, 2016

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Christine Gregg***University of California, Berkeley*

Because of the challenges associated with the inability to resupply for repair, future deep space exploration missions will require innovative material and structural solutions to achieve lighter, stronger, more reliable, and more multifunctional structures. Digital lattice materials offer a unique approach to achieving these goals, generating from discrete parts lattice solids that behave as continuum materials. Such materials have shown extraordinary strength and stiffness properties at ultralow density, are reconfigurable, and allow customization of material properties based on control of lattice substructure. Despite demonstration of these properties, the failure mechanisms, fracture toughness, and fatigue properties of these materials are not well understood. Characterization of these properties is critical for safe and efficient implementation of these materials in critical load bearing applications. This project seeks to not only characterize the fundamental fracture and fatigue scaling laws associated with digital lattice materials of cuboctahedral structure, but also investigate novel macrostructural toughening mechanisms. In additional, because the potential for reconfigurablity is a primary advantage of these materials in deep space (where material lifecycle is of critical importance), this research will also investigate appropriate characterization of material fracture and fatigue properties for reconfigured digital lattice structures. Experimental investigation will utilize standard fatigue and fracture specimens (3 point bend notched specimen) to compare the behavior of digital lattice materials to other cellular solids. These will also be compared to similar tests that investigate the influence of macroscopic toughening features designed into the lattice on fracture and fatigue performance. Finally, similar tests will be used to verify the ability to predict degraded fracture and fatigue properties associated with reconfigured material that has be pre-cycled. The results of this work will be in direct support of NASA Technological Roadmap Technology Area 12 by investigating novel approaches to increasing the toughness (and therefore reliability) of ultra-lightweight structures. Such work is also critical for designing appropriate health monitoring strategies. Finally, ability to predict the degraded properties of reconfigured material is a key enabling technology material recylcability that could revolutionize material and structural life cycles in space applications.

**Back to NSTRF 2016 Full List**
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131886 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131886 COA: 270589 Genesee CC: 05-016975-FC JEREMY ALAN LIKENS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

l1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2000,
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          893816
<NAME>                                         INFOCROSSING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         46,980,485
<SECURITIES>                                   5,367,016
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,427,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                   468,457
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,321,221
<PP&E>                                         12,104,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,248,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 81,683,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,220,044
<BONDS>                                        8,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          32,108,795
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       58,835
<OTHER-SE>                                     43,550,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   81,683,080
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,056,271
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,293,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,963,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               141,338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,414,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (984,249)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,430,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,288,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.24)



</TABLE>
BSFS Equipment Leasing                              Lease Agreement #6790397-001
Lease Agreement

Leesee's Name:             VISTA VACATIONS INTERNATIONAL

Address:                   5653 NW 29th Street

City/State/Zip Code:       Margate, FL 33063

Contact:                   Teri Nadler

Fax Number: 954-753-9186


Term (in months)           36

                                  855.24

Advanced Rent              1 @ $2,566.76
                               ---------
                               $3,421.00

Monthly Rent              2 -36    @ $473.80

System:                   ICS Phone System

System Price:             $17,105.04

Total Price:              $17,105.04

Supplier Name:            Bellsouth Communications Systems Co,
Address:                  5405 Windward Parkway
City/State/Zip:           Alpharetta, GA 30004

By:                       /s/ Teri Nadler

Title:                    President

Date:                     12/30/98



                                      182
<PAGE>

                                      -107-


                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ART Advanced Research
Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Micheline Bouchard, Chief Executive Officer of ART Advanced Research
Technologies Inc., certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ART
Advanced Research Technologies Inc.

Date: April 24, 2006

                                        ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC.


                                        (s) Micheline Bouchard
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Micheline Bouchard
                                        Title: President and Chief Executive
                                               Officer
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

August 31, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at Aerospace 

Industries Association (AIA) Reception on September 7, 2023 

On September 7, 2023, Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) being designated as a notfor-profit organization under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will 

hold a Congressional Space Reception at the Kennedy Caucus Room, Constitution Ave., 

NE, Washington DC, 20002, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. AIA will be in control of the 

planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. 

Approximately 150 - 200 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a 

diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, 

members of the legislative branch, state and local government officials, representatives 

from academia, industry, and foreign entities. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is approximately $20.00 per person. Attendance at this event will 

allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find 

that the event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 

C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. NASA employees who do 

not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the sponsors may accept an 

invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that 

the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsors, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 
2 

Additionally, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989 may only accept the invitation if they reimburse the 

hosts the fair market value of the events.

Adam F. Greenstone
#### LEE CYCLE CENTER, INC. d/b/a WILSON CYCLE CENTER and LEE MOTOR COMPANY, INC. v. WILSON CYCLE CENTER, INC. d/b/a CAROLINA MOTORSPORTS and CAROLINA MOTORSPORTS OF WILSON, INC.

No. 271A01

(Filed 18 December 2001)

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) of a decision by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 143 N.C. App. 1, 545 S.E.2d 745 (2001), affirming in part and reversing in part a judgment signed by Ragan, J., on 27 September 1999 in Superior Court, Wilson County. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 December 2001.

*Farris and Farris, P.A., by Robert A. Farris, Jr.; Thomas J. Farris; and William M.J. Farris, for plaintiff-appellants.*

*Narron & Holdford, P.A., by I. Joe Ivey, for defendant-appellees.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Radware Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roy Zisapel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 24, 2011




/s/ Roy ZisapelRoy ZisapelChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7573

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME DERRICK HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.

(8:96-cr-00260-PJM)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Derrick Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*In calculating the file date of his notice of appeal, we have

given Harris the benefit of Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988)

and Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Derrick Harris seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2006). In criminal cases, the

defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the

entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United

States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding

that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal

period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of

excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an

extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th

Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its order denying the motion

for reduction of sentence on August 11, 2006. Harris filed the

notice of appeal on August 31, 2006,* after the ten-day period

expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period.

Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect

period, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and remand the

case to the district court for the court to determine whether

Harris has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an

extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as
- 3 -

supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further

consideration.

REMANDED
#### LASHLEE v. WHITE CONSOL. INDUS., INC.

No. 548P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 684

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
Exhibit H

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-8 Filed 10/25/17 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32



M & F BANCORP, INC.





Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc.
(the “Company”) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013, as
amended by Amendment No. 1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (together the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|Dated: | March  24, 2014 | /s/ Kim D. Saunders                                       
|------ | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|       |                 | Kim D. Saunders
        President, Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: | March 24, 2014  | /s/ Randall C. Hall                                       
|       |                 | Randall C. Hall
        Chief Financial Officer           



*This certification is made solely for purpose
of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin Masterston,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03674-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8292 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8292 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2