alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,454
<PP&E>                                         151,137
<DEPRECIATION>                               (124,331)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          408,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,274
<OTHER-SE>                                   (421,687)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,842
<SALES>                                         21,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,906
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               263,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (270,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (270,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (270,670)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.012)


</TABLE>
Order filed September 3, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00329-CV

____________

MICHELLE KAPLOWITZ, Appellant

V.

LONE STAR TAN GP, LLC; LST AUSTIN I, LTD; AND ASHLEY 

ALVILLAR, Appellees

On Appeal from the 26th District Court

Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-0550-C26

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due August 14, 2020. No brief or motion to extend time 

has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before September 

14, 2020, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATON
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2008, (the ”Report”), I, William P. Hales, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ William P.
Hales


William
P. Hales


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)














May 14,
2008









A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc.  and will be retained by Hemagen
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of ATEL  Financial  Services,  LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund V, L.P.  (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
September  30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:
November 11, 2004


/s/ Dean L. Cash
----------------------------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Mark Emerson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of English Language
Learning and Instruction System, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                              /s/ Mark Emerson
Date: March 26, 2004          ____________________________________
                              Mark Emerson
                              Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002Laurel Capital Group, Inc.In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, John A. Howard, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodcovered by the Report.   /s/ John A. Howard, Jr.     John A. Howard, Jr.  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BENJAMIN ORTIZ MARTINEZ.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit








ANNUITY SCHEDULE PAGE




ANNUITY NUMBER: [001-00001]    ISSUE DATE:  [March 1, 2013]


TYPE OF BUSINESS:  [Non-Qualified]


OWNER:  [John Doe DCD FBO Jack Doe]               DATE OF BIRTH:              SEX:  


KEY LIFE:  [Jack Doe]        DATE OF BIRTH:  [October 21,1975]    SEX:  [Male]
 

ALLOCATION OF INITIAL PUCHASE PAYMENT


PURCHASE PAYMENT:  [$100,000.00]


VARIABLE SUB-ACCOUNT ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE:
[[VA Fund 1]                    10%]
[VA Fund 2]                    10%]
[VA Fund 3]                    10%]
[VA Fund 4]                    10%]
[VA Fund 5]                    10%]]


INDEX STRATEGY ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE:
[[Point to Point with Cap Index Strategy]        20%]
[Tiered Participation Rate Index Strategy]    20%]
[Step Rate Plus Index Strategy]            10%]]        
    
HOLDING ACCOUNT PERIOD: [30] Days from the Issue Date


PURCHASE PAYMENT AGE LIMITATION:  No Additional Purchase Payments accepted


MINIMUM ADDITIONAL PURCHASE PAYMENT:  Not applicable


MINIMUM ADDITIONAL PURCHASE PAYMENT UNDER AUTOMATIC PURCHASE PLANS:  Not applicable


WITHDRAWALS


MAXIMUM FREE WITHDRAWAL PERCENTAGE: [10%]


MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL AMOUNT:  [$100]


MINIMUM SURRENDER VALUE AFTER A PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL:  [$2,000]


ALLOCATION OF ACCOUNT VALUE


MINIMUM VARIABLE SUB-ACCOUNT AMOUNT:  [$20]


MINIMUM INDEX STRATEGY AMOUNT:  [$2,000]
















RILA-SCH-DCD(11/19)    













ANNUITY SCHEDULE PAGE (continued)


CHARGES


INSURANCE CHARGE:


MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE: [


For Purchase Payments less than $1,000,000 the Insurance Charge is [1.15%]
    
For Purchase Payments of $1,000,000 or more the Insurance Charge is reduced to [1.05%]]


ADMINISTRATION CHARGE: [0.15%]


CONTINGENT DEFERRED SALES CHARGE:    The Contingent Deferred Sales Charge for each Purchase Payment is a percentage of the Purchase Payment being withdrawn that is in excess of the Free Withdrawal amount.  The charge decreases as the Purchase Payment ages.  The aging of a Purchase Payment is measured from the date it is allocated to your Annuity.The charge percentage is shown below.  The charge is deducted from the Allocation Options in the same proportion as the withdrawal upon which it is assessed.


	
							
	[Age of Purchase Payment Being Withdrawn

	

Year 0-1
	

Year 1-2
	

Year 2-3
	

Year 3-4
	

Year 4-5
	

Year 5-6
	

Year 6 or older



	7%
	7%
	6%
	5%
	4%
	3%
	0.00]






ANNUITIZATION


LATEST AVAILABLE ANNUITY DATE:  Not applicable


EARLIEST AVAILABLE ANNUITY DATE:  Not applicable


MINIMUM ANNUITY PAYMENT:  Not applicable


MINIMUM SURRENDER VALUE AT ANNUITIZATION:  Not applicable


SEPARATE ACCOUNT(S):


VARIABLE SEPARATE ACCOUNT(S): [Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation Variable Account B]


INDEX STRATEGIES SEPARATE ACCOUNT(S): [Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation Index Strategies Separate Account]




RIDERS AND ENDORSEMENTS MADE A PART OF THE ANNUITY ON THE ISSUE DATE:
[Medically Related Surrender Endorsement
Point to Point with Cap Index Strategy Endorsement
Tiered Participation Rate Index Strategy Endorsment
Step Rate Plus Index Strategy Endorsement]








RILA-SCH-DCD(11/19)    2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   August 8, 2003                           /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                                 Title: President and Treasurer

                                                 A  signed   original   of  this
                                                 written  statement  required by
                                                 Section  906 has been  provided
                                                 to CNL Income  Fund XIII,  Ltd.
                                                 and  will  be  retained  by CNL
                                                 Income  Fund  XIII,   Ltd.  and
                                                 furnished to the Securities and
                                                 Exchange   Commission   or  its
                                                 staff upon request.
#### STATE v. ADKINS

No. 9A94-4

Case below: Buncombe County Superior Court

“Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court is denied. Because an evidentiary hearing is now pending in Superior Court on defendant’s motion for appropriate relief, this denial is without prejudice to defendant to refile with this Court a petition for writ of certiorari as to issues determined by the Superior Court as a result of that hearing.” By order of the Court in conference this 4 day of October 2001.
#### Milette Shanon, Respondent, v Jerome D. Patterson, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 904]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered May 5, 2003, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J), dated June 4, 2003, as denied his cross motion to vacate the parties’ stipulation and for downward modification of his child support obligation and granted the plaintiffs motion to enforce the terms of the stipulation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court erred in determining that the defendant could challenge the stipulation of settlement before the entry of a judgment of divorce only by commencing a plenary action *(see Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold,*48 NY2d 51, 56 [1979]; *Cruciata v Cruciata,*10 AD3d 349 [2004]; *Bailey v Assam,*269 AD2d 344 [2000]; *Arguelles v Arguelles,*251 AD2d 611 [1998]; *Zeppelin v Zeppelin,*245 AD2d 504 [1997]; *cf. Spataro v Spataro,*268 AD2d 467 [2000]; *Riley v Riley,*179 AD2d 750 [1992]; *Lambert v Lambert,*142 AD2d 557 [1988]).

Nevertheless, the defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a downward modification of his support obligation *(see Matter of Hanlon v Hanlon,*303 AD2d 505 [2003]; *Beard v Beard,*300 AD2d 268 [2002]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             JANUARY 31,
                                                         ------------------
                                                          1997       1996
                                                         -------    -------
<S>                                                      <C>        <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding....................   21,773     21,447
Common equivalent shares from stock options............      482        504
                                                         -------    -------
Number of shares used in computing per share amounts...   22,215     21,951
                                                         =======    =======
Net income.............................................  $ 1,054    $10,544
                                                         =======    =======
Net income per share...................................  $  0.05    $  0.48
                                                         =======    =======
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 19, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement), 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Henry Liebman, Gail Katz, and Sodo Builders,*                     all of Seattle, Washington, acting as a group in concert; to retain voting shares of Regal Financial Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Regal Financial Bank, both of Seattle, Washington.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 1, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-27868 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL GATES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MARCELO, Dr.; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-56107 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02018-DDP-JC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Michael Gates, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate 

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-56107 

2004), and we affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gates failed 

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were 

deliberately indifferent in their treatment of Gates’s ear pain and hearing 

impairment. See id. at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if 

he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical 

malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of 

treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Gates’s motions for 

appointment of counsel because Gates failed to demonstrate exceptional 

circumstances. See Cano v. Taylor, 739 F.3d 1214, 1218 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting 

forth standard of review and requirements for appointment of counsel). Contrary 

to Gates’s contention, the documents that Gates submitted did not require the 

district court to hold a competency hearing. See Allen v. Calderon, 408 F.3d 1150, 

1153 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We reject as meritless Gates’s contention that the district court erred in its 

decision regarding Gates’s motion for an extension to complete discovery, because 

the district court granted Gates’s motion and provided him with his requested 

extension. 

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charge Calculation
Exhibit 12.1
(dollars in thousands) Three Months
    
    
    Three MonthsEnded
    
    
    Ended12/31/2004
    
    
    12/31/2003Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    796
    
    
    
    (3,150
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense + Amortization of deferred financing from continuing operations
    
    
    7,348
    
    
    
    8,203Interest factor of rental expense (1)
    
    
    2,120
    
    
    
    2,154Total fixed charges
    
    
    9,468
    
    
    
    10,357Pre-tax income from continuing operations plus fixed charges
    
    
    10,264
    
    
    
    7,207Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charge
    
    
    1.08
    
    
    
    0.70
    (2)
   (1) One-third of rental expense relating to operating leases is attributed to the interest portion. Management believes this respresents a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor.(2) For the three months ended December 31, 2003 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The Company must generate additional earnings of $3,150 to
achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1.