alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

John C. Stennis Space Center
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000

November 20, 2023

Office of the General Counsel

TO: Distribution
FROM: CA00/General Counsel

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Bayou Classic
Pre-Game Brunch on November 25, 2023

On November 25 and 26, 2023, the Bayou Classic college football event and game, sponsored
by Proctor and Gamble, will take place in New Orleans, Louisiana. This series of events will
include a brunch reception on November 25, 2023 from 11:30 AM until 1:00 PM located in
one of the conference rooms inside the Caesar Superdome. The reception will provide
attendees the opportunity to network and discuss space-related topics with local public
officials and contractors.

Approximately 250 people are expected to attend this event. Attendees will have a diversity
of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, academia, media,
industry representatives, and state officials. The estimated cost of the event, including all food
and beverages, is approximately $30 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA
attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event
meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)
(2).

I further determine that free attendance at the above-mentioned event is in the interest of the
agency because it will further agency programs and operations. Accordingly, NASA
employees , including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the
ethics pledge under Executive Order 13490, may accept an invitation for themselves for free
attendance to the brunch reception if they do not have a significant role in any pending
sensitive matter that will affect the interests of the sponsor and where acceptance would not
create an appearance that the sponsor is receiving preferential treatment. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency's interest in the employees! attendance outweighs any
concern that the employees may be, or may appear to, be, improperly influenced in the
performance of their duties.

However, where NASA employees may have a significant role in any pending sensitive matter


that will affect the interests of the sponsor, such as current procurement duties, or where
acceptance may create an appearance that the sponsor is receiving preferential treatment,
the employees should seek guidance from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may
rely on this determination.

Attendees are also reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a), which
provides that employees may accept gifts valued at no more than $20 per occasion (and no
more than $50 from one source in a calendar year).

CK Zz

Distribution:

ce:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from Credence
Systems 2nd Quarter  10-Q and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>               NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 APR-30-1998
<CASH>                            70,853
<SECURITIES>                      78,813
<RECEIVABLES>                     63,263
<ALLOWANCES>                       2,493
<INVENTORY>                       52,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 276,559
<PP&E>                            86,098
<DEPRECIATION>                    40,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   369,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             41,609
<BONDS>                          115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                              22
<OTHER-SE>                       213,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     369,935
<SALES>                          157,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 157,035
<CGS>                             67,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     67,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  63,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 3,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   27,202
<INCOME-TAX>                       9,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               17,978
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      17,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .81
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,092
<PP&E>                                         707,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 333,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,112,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          431,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           285
<OTHER-SE>                                     437,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,112,007
<SALES>                                        236,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,733
<CGS>                                          188,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Sify Limited (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

            (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for
      the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated: June 29, 2004                              /s/ R. Ramaraj
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: R. Ramaraj
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                  and Managing Director

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
#### HAIN PURE FOOD CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SONA FOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-2329.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 24, 1980.

*522Francis A. Utecht, Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Long Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William L. Respess, Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief; James W. Geriak Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SNEED and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Russell E. Smith, Senior United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This case involves alleged trademark infringement by Sona Food Products Company (“Sona”) arising from the label, trademark and trade dress used on various of its food products.

The district court entered a summary judgment which

1. granted a permanent injunction in favor of Hain Pure Food Co., Inc. (“Hain”);

2. declared Sona liable for damages;

3. declared that Hain was entitled to an accounting for damages; and

4. denied Hain’s request for attorney fees.

Sona appeals from that part of the summary judgment holding it liable for damages and Hain cross appeals for the denial of its attorney fees. Sona does not appeal from the granting of the permanent injunction.

The appeal must be dismissed because the court lacks jurisdiction. In holding that Hain was entitled to damages and an accounting for those damages, the court bifurcated the trial into the separate issues of liability and damages. Because the determination of liability, alone, is not a final judgment under the circumstances of this case, this court does not have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *See Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Wetzel,*424 U.S. 737, 744, 96 S.Ct. 1202, 1206, 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976); *Garzaro v. University of Puerto Rico,*575 F.2d 335, 337 (1st Cir. 1978). *See also United States v. Burnett,*262 F.2d 55, 59 (9th Cir. 1959). The parties have not called to our attention an applicable exception to this rule or any extraordinary circumstances which would permit this court to assume jurisdiction under § 1291.

Interlocutory appeals are permitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 but neither subsection of that section is applicable here. The trial court has not certified an interlocutory appeal pursuant to § 1292(b). Furthermore, § 1292(a)(1) pertaining to appeals from the granting of injunctions is not applicable because Sona is not appealing from that part of the summary judgment which permanently enjoins it from employing Hain’s label, trademark or trade dress.

The district court’s denial of Hain’s request for attorney fees is likewise not a final judgment.

The appeal and cross appeal are DISMISSED.
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Contact

For more information, contact Peter Zorba at peter.zorba@nasa.gov. 

PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 2023 | VERSION 1.0

NASA Protects the Environment and Native American

Resources at Santa Susana Field Laboratory

NASA is committed to cleaning up the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) in a manner that is 

protective of public health and the environment, and the site’s natural and cultural resources. 

The overarching goal in NASA’s cleanup efforts at Santa Susana Field Laboratory have been to safely 

protect human health, the environment, and the cultural legacy of the site.

SSFL has been identified as an Indian Sacred Site where the ancestors of Native American Tribes 

worshipped and lived, and it remains culturally significant to members of those Tribes. Native American 

sacred and archeological sites, ancient pictographs, stone tool production sites and habitation sites 

are located at SSFL. For more than a decade, NASA has engaged with both federally recognized and 

non-federally recognized Native American Tribes with cultural ties to the area, to better understand the 

significance of Native American cultural resources, and to work with tribes to protect the resources 

during NASA remediation. 

In August 2007, NASA, Boeing, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the California Department of Toxic 

Substances Control (DTSC) signed an agreement to address the cleanup of soils and groundwater at 

SSFL. Subsequently, in December 2010, NASA entered into an agreement with DTSC with specific 

requirements to complete the characterization and cleanup of soils in NASA-administered areas. 

Most recently, in 2022, NASA completed the demolition of the two Bravo Test Stands at SSFL and 

continued to work with DTSC to develop a final, comprehensive groundwater cleanup plan for NASAadministered areas at SSFL. The agency also kicked off a pilot study to test the effectiveness of 

bedrock vapor extraction to clean up contamination in the underlying bedrock matrix. NASA continues 

to consult and collaborate with the Native American community on a wide range of topics, working to 

ensure the sacred nature of the site is accessible and respected. 

Located on 2,850 acres, SSFL is 30 miles northwest 

of downtown Los Angeles, California. NASA is 

responsible for 450 acres of the facility, where test 

stands were used to test rocket engines that sent 

astronauts to space during the Apollo and Space 

Shuttle programs. Some chemicals have been found 

in the soil and groundwater on the grounds of SSFL. 

Primary contaminants include metals, petroleum 

products, and solvents. NASA has been rigorously 

investigating and conducting remediation activities 

where possible, since contamination was found in 

the late 1980s.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Initial Review Group; Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 30-31, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Helen Lin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-594-4952,                         *linh1@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 3, 2014.

Carolyn Baum,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-24064 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
NAC Aeronautics Committee
 

Friday, April 23, 2010
 

Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
 

(Building 1219, Room 225)
 

Friday, April 23rd 

8:00 a.m. – 8:10 a.m. 

8:10 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. 

8:45 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. 

Welcome and announcements 

Center director/Langley Briefing 

ATP Program and Strategic Plan Briefing and discussion 

10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Break

10:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. 

11:45 noon – 1:00 p.m. 

UAS Research Planning and Discussion 

V&V Research Planning and Discussion 

1:00 p.m. Adjourn public meeting
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Nahum Mondragon, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Ronald Zapata of counsel), for appellant.Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill and Eric C. Washer of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Dorothy Chin-Brandt, J.), rendered November 30, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>;<i> People v Murray</i>, 169 AD3d 227 [2019];<i> Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>SIEGAL, J.P., PESCE and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 31, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Paul F. McLaughlin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Rudolph Technologies, Inc.








Date: February 25, 2011








By:/s/  PAUL F. MCLAUGHLINPaul F. McLaughlinChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Aris Morfopoulos, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GeneMax Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
7. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
8. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
9. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  April 17, 2006 | By: "Aris Morfopoulos"Aris Morfopoulos, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 JurisdictionSubsidiary
    
    of Organization
    
    OwnershipSINA.com Online
    
    United States of America
    
    100 %Rich Sight Investment Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    100 %SINA Hong Kong Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    100 %Magic King Assets Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    100 %Memestar Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    100 %Crillion Corporation
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    100 %Davidhill Capital Inc.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    100 %Beijing SINA Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    99.35 %Beijing SINA Internet Technology Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %Beijing New Media Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %Beijing Davidhill Internet Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %Star-Village Internet Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %SINA.com Technology (China) Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %Fayco Network Technology Development (Shenzhen)
Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    100 %
#### MICHAEL J. DOTSKO v. SETON HALL UNIVERSITY.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.