alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the Annual Report of Quovadx, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge
and belief, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Melvin L. KeatingMelvin L. KeatingExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer) March 9, 2005
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

February 27, 2024 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space Policy 

Institute, George Washington University Dinner on February 27, 2024 

On February 27, 2024, the Space Policy Institute (SPI), George Washington University 

(GWU), a nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a 

dinner at the DACOR Bacon House, 1801 F Street NW, Washington, DC, from 7:00 p.m. to 

9:00 p.m. The guest speaker is Francis Brooke, Policy Director for the House Majority 

Leader, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA). 

Approximately 110 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, 

academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $127 per person. SPI is in control of the organizing, planning and 

invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the SPI/GWU, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their 

local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
#### Justina Ganda, Appellant, v Deborah Cardinale, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 919]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated July 28, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her burden of proving that she did not *482create or have actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]; *Dane v Taco Bell Corp.,*297 AD2d 274 [2002]). The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]).

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

John F. Kennedy Space Center

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

February 12, 2024

Reply to Attn of: CC

TO: Distribution

FROM: CC/Acting Chief Counsel

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 2024 Business 

Development Board (BDB) of Palm Beach County National Engineer's Week 

Honors and Awards Banquet

On February 13, 2024, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Pratt & Whitney, Power Systems Manufacturing, 

Florida Power and Light, EXP Engineering, and Belcan, LLC will host a reception and dinner at 

the Raymond F. Kravis Center in West Palm Beach, Florida. The event is to provide a venue for 

informal discussion for representatives from industry, NASA personnel, and others, as well as for 

an engineering professionals awards recognition dinner. 

The hosts have invited over 300 persons to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of views 

or interests and will include award recipients from sponsoring and non-sponsoring companies, 

their guests and nominators, academia, members of the BDB of Palm Beach County, and 

members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is 

$125 per person. The Engineer's Council is the award provider for the event. Attendance at 

this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA 

programs. I find that the event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as 

defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsors may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. 

In those circumstances, I find that the Agency's interest in attendance outweighs any concern 

that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

his or her duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989 may attend the event only if they reimburse 

the sponsor the value of the event. 
2

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of Aerojet Rocketdyne, Pratt & Whitney, Power Systems Manufacturing, 

Florida Power and Light, EXP Engineering, or Belcan, LLC, such as procurement duties, program 

management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate 

determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Thomas Browder 16:32:52 -05'00'

Date: 2024.02.12

Thomas M. Browder III
Rev Feb 2024 Hours of Operation Working Hours Phone Numbers URGENT 

After- Hours Phone Numbers

ARC 24/7/365 Primary: 800-344-4222 800-344-4222

Primary: 661-802-8359

Secondary: 661-276-6030 

Secondary: 661-276-2034

GRC Mon & Wed: 8:00 am to 3:00 pm 

Thurs: 8:00 am to 2:00 pm Primary: 216-433-2989 888-964-3032

HQ 24/7/365 Primary: 866-216-1996 866-216-1996

JPL 24/7/365 Primary: 800-367-7474 800-367-7474

Mon-Fri: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm during 

standard work weeks 

Mon-Thurs: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm during 

"quiet Friday" work weeks

Primary: 228-363-4910

Secondary: 504-257-2415

Primary: 256-544-7549

Secondary: 256-698-9589

Primary: 228-363-4910

Secondary: 228-688-3005

JSC –

All locations

including WSTF

KSC Mon-Fri: 7:00 am to 4:30 pm

 Primary: 281-483-6130

888-964-3032

888-964-3032

Primary: 321-289-6674 

Primary: 321-289-7432

 Secondary: 321-867-7398 

Secondary: 321-861-8647

MSFC Mon-Fri: 7:30 am to 4:00 pm 888-964-3032

SSC Mon-Fri: 7:00 am to 3:30 pm 888-964-3032

LRC Primary: 866-216-1996 866-216-1996

MAF Mon-Fri: 7:00 am to 3:30 pm 888-964-3032

 24/7/365

AFRC Mon-Fri: 6:30 am to 4:00 pm 888-964-3032

24/7/365 Primary: 800-222-0364 800-222-0364 GSFC - All 

locations
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Rodger E. Rees, Chief Financial Officer of Empire Financial Holding
Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
   information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report and based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
   control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
   recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2006

/s/ Rodger E. Rees
-------------------
Rodger E. Rees,
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2111 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2111

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                           State of New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2004

  Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                           State of New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860C-1(b) of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 241 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 
and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) No cca areas within new york.--A CCA area shall not 
        include an MSA any portion of which is within the State of New 
        York.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
# Electric Propulsion and Power Laboratory Develops and Tests Spacecraft Power

It takes powerful, steady propulsion to help a spacecraft travel through the wide expanse of space.  At NASA Glenn’s Electric Propulsion and Power Lab (EPPL), two very large space environment simulation chambers and 10 smaller chambers, allow engineers to test electric propulsion and power systems.Click on the arrows or any of the icons to learn more about the amazing capabilities of these chambers and see testing in action. 

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    EPPL: Main

    EPPL: Chamber 5

    EPPL: Chamber 6

    EPPL: Chamber 5 Outer

    EPPL: Chamber 5 Control Area

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 

 July 13, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at U.S. Chamber 

of Commerce Workshop on July 13, 2023

On July 13, 2023, the U.S Chamber of Commerce will hold a workshop at the U.S. 

Chamber of Commerce, Capitol Hill Office, 25 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington DC, 

20001, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. The workshop will be followed by a cocktail reception.

The U.S. Chambers of Commerce will be in control of the planning, organizing, and 

issuing invitations for this event. Maxar, and Capella Space will be financial sponsors of 

the reception. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is designated as a not-for-profit

organization under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Service Code,

Approximately 125 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of 

the legislative branch, state and local government officials, representatives from academia,

industry, and foreign entities. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and 

beverages, is approximately $38.55 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA 

attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event 

meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees who do 

not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the sponsors may accept an 

invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that 

the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsors, such as procurement duties, program management, or 
2

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Additionally, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989 may only accept the invitation if they reimburse the 

hosts the fair market value of the events.

Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their 

individual situation.

for Adam F. Greenstone
1

Office of Procurement

Leadership Structure

Karla Smith Jackson

Assistant Administrator 

for Procurement

Marvin L. Horne

Deputy Assistant 

Administrator for Procurement

PROCUREMENT STRATEGIC 

OPERATIONS DIVISION (PSOD)

Andre Sheppard

Acting Division Director

PROCUREMENT & GRANTS 

POLICY DIVISION (PGPD)

Julia B. Wise

Division Director

ENTERPRISE SERVICE AND 

ANALYSIS DIVISION (ESAD)

Geoffrey S. Sage

Division Director

John Cannaday

MSFC

Gerald Norris

KSC

James Williams

NOJMO

Bradley Niese

Acting JSC

SarahPollock

IPTO

Mary Stevens

GSFC

Kurt Straub 

ARC & GRC

James Eastman 

AFRC

Eli Ouder

NSSC & SSC

Senior Executive Service

PROCUREMENT OFFICERS

Todd Pospisil

Research Center 

Teresa Hass

Acting LaRC
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY FISCHMAN, DECEASED.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Office of the Administrator

Administrator

Deputy Administrator

Associate Administrator

Ames Rese

Dryden Flight R

Glenn Rese

Goddard Spac

Jet Propulsio

Johnson Sp

Kennedy Sp

Langley Res

Marshall Spac

EducationExternal RelationsLegislative AffairsPublic Affairs

Diversity and Equal Opportunity

Human Capital Management

Infrastructure and Administration

NASA Shared Services Center

Procurement

Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

Mission Directorates Mission Support Offices NASA Cente

Chief of Staff 

Deputy Chief of Staff/ 

White House Liaison

Safety and Mission 

Assurance

Chief Engineer

Program Analysis and 

Evaluation 

Aeronautics Research

Exploration Systems

Science

Space Operations

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Information Officer

Chief Health and Medical Officer

General Counsel

Innovative Partnership Program

Institutions and Management

Integrated Enterprise Management Program

Security and Program Protection

Strategic Communications

NASA

Stennis Sp

* In accordance with law, the offices of Diversity and Equal Opportunity and Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization maintain report

the Deputy Administrator and Administrator.
Exhibit  21.1





List of Subsidiaries





|Name of Subsidiary                   |  | State/Country of Incorporation
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|                                     |  |                               
|Wholly-owned Direct Subsidiaries     |  |                               
|B&B Advertising, Inc.                |  | Delaware                      
|MIVA Direct, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                      
|MIVA Small Business Solutions, Inc.  |  | Delaware                      
|Who Midco Corporation                |  | Delaware                      
|                                     |  |                               
|Wholly-owned Indirect Subsidiaries   |  |                               
|MIVA Media International, Inc.       |  | Delaware                      
|MIVA (UK) Ltd.                       |  | United Kingdom                
|Espotting Media Ireland Ltd.         |  | Ireland                       
|Espotting Scandinavia                |  | Sweden                        
|MIVA (France) S.a.r.l                |  | France                        
|MIVA Media S.L.                      |  | Spain                         
|MIVA (Deutschland) GmbH              |  | Germany                       
|MIVA (Italia) S.r.l.  a socio unico |  | Italy                         




---
Opinion issued June 28, 2012 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00453
- CV

——————————— TEXAS RICE LAND PART NERS, LTD., JAMES E. HOLLA N D, AND

DAVID C. HOLLAND , Appellant s

V. DENBURY GREEN
- PIPELINE TEXAS, LTD. AND MIKE LATTA , Appellee s
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 114012

MEMORANDUM OPINION Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., James E. Holla n d, and David C. Holland brought this restricted appeal from a trial court’s order confirming the award of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding. To prevail on a restricted appeal, a2

party must show : (1) it filed notice of the restricted appeal within six months after
t he judgment was signed; (2) it was a party to the underlying lawsuit; (3) it did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the judgment complained of and did not timely file any post

- decree motions or requests for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (4) error is apparent on the face of the record. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Lejeune , 297 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009); see T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.1(c), 30. The parties have not yet briefed this case, but they have submitted an agreed statement of the case. See T EX
. R. A PP . 34.3. According to the agreed statement of the case and this court’s review of the record , all four requirements for relief in a restricted appeal have been met: appellants filed a notice of appeal within six months of the date the judgme nt was signed, appellants were parties to the lawsuit, appellants did not participate in a hearing or trial because none was held, and th ere is error on the face of the record because judgment was entered without any notice of a trial or dispositive hearin g being given to any party. See Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc. , 485 U.S. 80, 84 , 108 S. Ct. 896, 899 (1988) ( stating that failure to give notice of proceeding that will be accorded finality is violation of due process);
T EX
. R. C IV
. P . 245 (providing for mandatory forty

- five day notice of a trial setting in contested cases ); Ramsey v. Davis , 261 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2008, pet. denied) (stating failure to give notice of trial setting violates due3

process). We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRAT

Chief Engineer (D)

Safety & Mi

Assurance 

Associate Admin

Chief Financial 

Officer (B) General Counsel (G)

Legislative Aff

Assistant Admin

Procurement (H) 

Assistant Administrator

Equal Opportunity 

Programs (E) 

Assistant Administrator

Small and Disadvantaged 

Business Utilization (K) 

Assistant Administrator

Space Flight (M) 

Associate Administrator

Aeronautics (R) 

Associate Administrator

Space Science (S) 

Associate Administrator

Human Resources (F) 

Assistant Administrator

Institutional & Corporate 

Management (O) 

Assistant Administrator

External Relations (I) 

Assistant Administrator

Education (N) 

Associate Administrator

Aerospace Safety 

Advisory Panel

NASA Advisory 

Council

Inspector General (W)

• Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center•John F. Kennedy Space Center•John C. StennisSpace Center•George C. Marshall Space Flight Center

•Ames Research Center•Dryden Flight Research Center•Langley Research Center•John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field

•Jet Propulsion Laboratory *

Exploration System

Associate Administr

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

* JPL is a contractor-op