alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Hamilton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2006



By:

/s/ Robert T. HamiltonName:

Robert T. HamiltonTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to eDiets.com, Inc. and will be retained by eDiets.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Robert Johnson, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 856]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged with violating the prison disciplinary *756rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Initially, petitioner challenges the evidence upon which the determination is based, specifically attacking the chain of custody of the specimen that yielded the positive test results. Based upon our review of the record, however, we find that appropriate testing procedures were followed and the chain of custody was properly established so as to ensure the reliability of the positive test results *(see Matter of Davis v Goord,*8 AD3d 854, 855 [2004]; *Matter of Dunn v Selsky,*7 AD3d 938, 938-939 [2004]). Those results, together with the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Odome v Goord,*8 AD3d 921, 922 [2004]; *Matter of Williams v New York State Dept. of Correction,*8 AD3d 920, 921 [2004]). Furthermore, we do not find that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias *(see Matter of McCorkle v Bennett,*8 AD3d 918, 919 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### ROBERT LIEBLING v. MICHAEL MARONE, M.D.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Matthew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James M. Matthew                                August 18, 2006
-----------------------                             ---------------
James M. Matthew                                          Date
Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 547 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2214 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3150 Great Northern Avenue in Missoula, Montana, as the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2004 

Mr. BURNS (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in Missoula, 

Montana, as the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIKE MANSFIELD POST OFFICE, MISSOULA, 

4 MONTANA. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in 
2 

•S 2214 RS 

1 Missoula, Montana, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post 

7 Office’’. 

Calendar No. 547 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2214 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfield Post Office’’. nue in Missoula, Montana, as the ‘‘Mike Mans- al Service located at 3150 Great Northern AveJUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,752-01

EX PARTE CLONE KINSEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1650087-A IN THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to 32 years’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he did not receive timely notice from the appellate court or counsel

notifying him of the disposition of his appeal and informing him of his right to file a petition for

discretionary review (PDR). He states that he would have filed a PDR if he had been aware of his

rights. He avers that he is entitled to an out-of-time PDR. Ex parte Florentino, 206 S.W.3d 124, 125

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant was

denied the right to file a pro se PDR through no fault of his own.
2

Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (“In this case,

there was a breakdown in the system, and due process requires that Applicant be permitted to

exercise his statutory right to file a petition for discretionary review.”) Applicant may file an out-oftime PDR of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in cause number 01-20-00088-CR. Should

Applicant decide to file a PDR, he must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date of this

Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: May 17, 2023

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-43114, No. 333-89082 and No. 333-121437) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan and 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of Monogram Biosciences, Inc. (Formerly ViroLogic, Inc.) and in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-65716, No. 333-70562, No. 333-86892, No. 333-102273,No. 333-102995, No. 333-103980, No. 333-121438 and No. 333-121475) and related Prospectuses of Monogram Biosciences, Inc. (Formerly ViroLogic, Inc.) of our report dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the financialstatements and schedule of Monogram Biosciences, Inc. (Formerly ViroLogic, Inc.) as of December 31, 2004 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 15, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as                           ( print page 68367)                        amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, DBS T32's.                    

*Date:*                         December 3, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marita R. Hopman, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6911,                         *opmannm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-28076 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Aris Morfopoulos, Chief Executive Officer of GeneMax Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  April 17, 2006 | By: "Aris Morfopoulos"Aris Morfopoulos, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.  A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Quovadx, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2004, except for
Note 9 as to which the date is March 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Quovadx, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003:

1.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-30356) pertaining to the
     Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
     1999 Director Option Plan and 2000 Non-Statutory Option Plan

2.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-67436) pertaining to the
     Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
     1999 Director Option Plan and 2000 Non-Statutory Option Plan

3.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-88408) pertaining to the
     Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
     Amended and Restated 1999 Director Option Plan and Amended and Restated
     2000 Non-Statutory Option Plan

4.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-104184) pertaining to the
     Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Plan, Amended and Restated 1999 Employee
     Stock Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated 1999 Director Option Plan and
     Amended and Restated 2000 Non-Statutory Option Plan

5.   Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 on
     Form S-8 (No. 333-67650) pertaining to the Healthcare.com Corporation Stock
     Option Plan, Healthcare.com Corporation Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan,
     Healthcare.com Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, and
     Healthcare.com Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan

6.   Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 on
     Form S-8 (No. 333-110388) pertaining to the Rogue Wave Software, Inc. 1996
     Equity Incentive Plan and Rogue Wave Software, Inc. 1997 Equity Incentive
     Plan


                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 17, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>     0001093677
<NAME>     Flintrock Financial Services, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        17846
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      2100
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
Executive Order 13678

# Conversion Authority for Criminal Investigators (Special Agents) of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 3301 and 3302 of title 5, United States Code, and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1.***Providing Conversion Authority.*                     I find that conditions of good administration (specifically, the need to make the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice (ATF), competitive in recruiting high quality special agents by giving the ATF an authority held by other Federal law enforcement agencies) make necessary an exception to the competitive examination rules for appointment to certain positions in the Federal civil service.                

Criminal Investigators of the ATF, who have been appointed under Schedule B, and who have completed 3 years of fully satisfactory service, may be converted non-competitively to career appointments if they meet qualifications and other requirements established by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

**Sec. 2.***Implementation.*                     The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to implement this order.                

**Sec. 3.***General Provisions.*                     (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2014-24218

Billing code 3295-F5
#### Jno. Boyd, Admr. *v.*Jas. Lester.

Sheriff — Failure to Return Execution — Sufficient Excuse.

While the execution was in force and after it had been paid, it was held up by instruction of the plaintiff; *held,*that under the circumstances it was a sufficient excuse for the failure to return the execution.

APPEAL EEOM LYON CIBCUIT COUET.

June 12, 1867.

Opinion of the Ooubt by

Judge Habdin:

"Whether any sufficient cause of action or not alleged in the petition as amended which, as suggested for the appellants, neither avers that any special damage was sustained by the official delinquency of the sheriff, nor that his failure to return the execution was without reasonable excuse as provided in section 4 of article 18 of chapter 36 of the Bevised Statutes, vol. 1, p. 493, we think the fact alleged by the appellants, and which is sustained by a preponderance of the evidence, that while the execution was in force and after it had been paid, it was *“*held up by instructions of the plaintiff, James Lester,” was under all the circumstances a sufficient excuse for the failure to return the execution. It d.oes not appear that after the stay directed by the plaintiff in the executions he ordered the sheriff to take further action, nor is it otherwise framed that the officer was guilty of willful neglect. The above conclusion seems in conformity to the decisions of this court in the cases of Shaman *v.*Clark, 3 Dana, 152, and Bapit, etc. *v.*Bomer, etc., 3 B. Mon. 331.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the eause remanded for a new trial and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. This reversal embraces both the judgment against Young’s administrator and the subsequent judgment against his sureties.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2251

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to increase 
                      the loan rate for safflower.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2004

 Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Burns) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to increase 
                      the loan rate for safflower.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOAN RATES FOR NONRECOURSE MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS.

    Section 1202(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 7932(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (17) as 
        paragraphs (11) through (18), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
            ``(10) In the case of safflower, $0.1210 per pound.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (11) (as redesignated by paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by inserting ``(except safflower)'' after 
                ``other oilseeds'';
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (D); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (I) 
                as subparagraphs (D) through (H), respectively.
                                 <all>
```