alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters 

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 March 14, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Airbus 

Defence & Space reception on March 14, 2023 

On March 14, 2023, Airbus Defence & Space will hold an exclusive cocktail reception at 

the Airbus Experience Center, 1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20004, at 

6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The purpose of the event is to network. Airbus Defence & Space is 

in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. 

Approximately 75 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include personnel from congressional staffers, state and local 

officials, academia, industry representatives, administration personnel, media, and space 

investors. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is 

approximately $35 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to 

exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of 

the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest (if 

invited) to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance 

outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly 

influenced in the performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career 

positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may 

only attend the event if they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the Airbus Defence & Space, such as procurement duties, program 

management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a 

separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the 

invitation. Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to 

their individual situation. 

 

Adam F. Greenstone
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2243 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 601
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2243

                          [Report No. 108-286]

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2004

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                             June 25, 2004

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11480, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 
years after the date of issuance of the license.

                                                       Calendar No. 601

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2243

                          [Report No. 108-286]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 17, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 17, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0321. RAFAEL E. AGUIRRE v. YESLY TAVERA et al .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

21CV0476
PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________________

No. 97-2540

________________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 85-CV-7009 &

85-CV-7010

GREGORY SOLOMON, PATRICIA BECKWITH,

et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

LIBERTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LIBERTY

COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________________________________________________

(Opinion February 3, 1999, 166 F.3d 1135, 11th Cir., 1999)

(March 14, 2000)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK,

CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor

of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
2
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form SB-2 No. 333-31947, Form S-8 No. 333-53159, Form S-8 No. 333-63799, Form
S-3 No. 333-77923, Form S-3 No. 333-35662 and Form S-3 No. 333-40630) of
ViewCast.com, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February
27, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ViewCast.com,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000.



                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2001
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STEVEN MURRAY GROVER, SR.

No. 198A01

(Filed 9 November 2001)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 142 N.C. App. 411, 543 S.E.2d 179 (2001), ordering a new trial of judgments entered 8 March 1999 by Spencer, J., in Superior Court, Granville County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 October 2001.

*Roy A. Cooper, Attorney General, by Celia Grasty Lata, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.*

*Thomas L. Currinfor defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Peter A. Corrao, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A of MIVA, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material aspects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: April 7, 2009/s/ PETER A. CORRAO President and Chief Executive Officer, MIVA, Inc.


1

---



QuickLinks
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CLIFFORD L. GOLDEN, )

DOC #R03164, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2269

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 9, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Alfonzo McMillian, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03446-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8602 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TRUSTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     52
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           52
<PP&E>                                 87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                         59,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         27,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             27,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           27,599
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        7,966
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            7,560
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated January 30, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and included in the amended Annual Report of Findwhat.com
and Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of Findwhat.com and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-46008,
effective date September 18, 2000 and SEC File No. 333-66434, effective date
August 1, 2001) and on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-76144, effective date December
31, 2001, SEC File No. 333-47240, effective date May 3, 2001 and SEC File No.
333-102436, effective January 9, 2003).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Tampa, Florida
April 29, 2003
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2190

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to the 

Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human person. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of 

amendment to the Constitution for the right to life of 

each born and preborn human person.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Life at Conception 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE. 

7 To implement equal protection for the right to life 

8 of each born and preborn human person, and pursuant 

9 to the duty and authority of the Congress, including Con10 gress’ power under article I, section 8, to make necessary 
2

•S 2190 IS 

1 and proper laws, and Congress’ power under section 5 of 

2 the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

3 United States, the Congress hereby declares that the right 

4 to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each 

5 human being. 

6 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

7 For purposes of this Act: 

8 (1) HUMAN PERSON; HUMAN BEING.—The 

9 terms ‘‘human person’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include 

10 each and every member of the species homo sapiens 

11 at all stages of life, including, but not limited to, the 

12 moment of fertilization, cloning, and other moment 

13 at which an individual member of the human species 

14 comes into being. 

15 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ used in the 

16 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

17 United States and other applicable provisions of the 

18 Constitution includes the District of Columbia, the 

19 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other terri20 tory or possession of the United States.

Æ
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS AIKENS.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
This book is dedicated to all those who 

contributed to the successful launch of Artemis I 

on November 16, 2022, and to those working 

toward the future of deep space exploration.
HOORAY FOR SLS

Written by Lane Polak

Illustrated by Heather Rose Legge-Click

Product of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

We’re going back someday real soon,

and I can hardly wait.

We’re going back to outer space

it’s gonna be so great!
We’ve got a way to get us there

and travel to the stars.

Our trip begins back to the Moon,

but then it’s off to Mars.


“What gets us there? 

What can it be?

Does it fit inside a pocket?”

The only way to go that far

is to use our special rocket ...
Say hello to SLS!

It’s our own Space Launch System.


Our team of unique rocket folks

have filled it with their wisdom.
Three hundred twenty-two feet tall,

that’s twenty-eight T-rexes!


This rocket tans a shade of orange,

and with its power – flexes.
Our rocket has so many parts,

each one with its own task.

“What are those parts? 

What do they do?”

I thought you’d never ask...


It has a core that’s filled with fuel,

that’s gas like in your car.
Computer brains to navigate,

that help us travel far.


Four engines made to give it lift

will help this baby soar.
Two boosters give a lot of oomph,

and like a lion, roar!!!


We’re going deeper into space.

It’s gonna be the best.

We’re going to the Moon then Mars, 

and it’s thanks to SLS!
We are the Artemis Generation!

Scan the QR code to continue your journey.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATON
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009, (the ”Report”), I, William P. Hales, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ William P. Hales


William
P. Hales


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)














May 14,
2009







































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles A. Ross, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vista Exploration
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual reports is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying office and I have disclosed, based on my
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date:  April 13, 2004

/s/  Charles A. Ross, Sr.
-------------------------
     Charles A. Ross, Sr.
     Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SHELDON KREPS.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF CHARLES F. POST F/B/O WILLIAM C. POST.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-50770 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ALBERTO FEGURACION-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-859-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto FeguracionMartinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has f iled a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Feguracion-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pr e s e n t s no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-50770 Document: 00511824698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012No. 11-50770

to withdr a w i s GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-50770 Document: 00511824698 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012