alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel,President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: May 7, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: August 13, 2004

                                         BY:   /s/  Paul S. Shipman
                                         --------------------------------------
                                                Paul S. Shipman
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### Kenneth Memminger, Respondent, v Nelson Gardens, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[787 NYS2d 870]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered June 18, 2004, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to Queens County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*443Venue was properly placed in Bronx County, which is listed in the nonappearing defendant’s certificate of incorporation as the location of its principal office (CPLR 503 [c]; *see Conway v Gateway Assoc.,*166 AD2d 388 [1990]; *cf. Lucarello v New York Zoological Socy.,*220 AD2d 312 [1995]). Venue was properly retained in Bronx County on the ground that appellants failed to satisfy their burden of showing that the convenience of material witnesses would be served by changing venue to Queens County *(see Cardona v Aggressive Heating,*180 AD2d 572 [1992]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Auditors

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. pertaining to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-30016 and post-effective amendment thereto), Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96447), 1999 Incentive Plan
(Form S-8 No. 333-96449), Teledyne, Inc. 401(k) Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96451 and post-effective amendment
thereto), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96455), Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-96457), Retirement Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-43962), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-54318),
Broad Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-54320), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-60236) and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-60240) of our report dated January 21, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.



Woodland Hills, California
March 18, 2002

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

----

**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

          Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. (the “Registrant”) that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.

| Date:  March   16, 2007 | By:    | /s/  David W.   Heeter           |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                       |
|                         |   | David W. Heeter                       |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                                  |
|                         |   |                                  |
| Date:  March   16, 2007 | By:    | /s/  Timothy   J. McArdle        |
|                         |   |                                       |
|                         |   | Timothy J. McArdle                    |
|                         |   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   |                                  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 5, 2005



By

/s/ Christopher C. JureyChristopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; NIA Aged Cell Bank.                    

*Date:*                         November 10, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elaine Lewis, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707,                         *elainelewis@nia.nih.gov.*

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 6, 2014.

Melanie J. Gray, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-24183 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial
Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2009



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
                            
   UBER
1455 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103
US
April 10, 2017
Jill Hazelbaker


RE: TRANSFER LETTER
Dear Jill,
This letter is to confirm that you are transferring to the role of SVP, Policy & Communications, based in San Francisco, CA effective April 12th. 
Your new salary for this full-time position is USD 1,500,000 (one million five hundred dollars), less applicable withholdings, which will be paid according to Uber's normal payroll procedures. All other terms of your employment will remain the same unless otherwise stated.


Performance Bonus


In your new role as SVP of Policy & Communications, you will continue to be eligible to participate in Uber's annual performance bonus program. Bonus amounts are delivered mostly in equity, vesting over three years. Uber does not guarantee that you will receive a bonus - the lowest 20% of performers should not expect to receive an award, and all awards are at the discretion of the Company. To qualify for a performance bonus, you must remain employed at the Company at the time of payout.


RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS


As soon as reasonably practicable after the date you commence your new role, and subject to the approval of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") (or a duly constituted committee thereof), the Company shall grant you 61,513 restricted stock units ("RSUs") with respect  to shares of the Company's Common Stock. The RSUs will be subject to both a time-based and a








1







performance-based vesting condition as well as to other terms and conditions set forth in the Company's 2013 Equity Plan (the "Equity Plan") and in the Company's standard form of RSU Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event your employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Equity Plan) within the first 12 months following the date of this Agreement or reduces your salary within the first 12 months of the date of this Agreement, an aggregate of of 12/48 of the RSUs granted to you pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to satisfy the time-based condition as of the date of your termination. [For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Agreement shall impact any prior agreements related to vesting of RSUs or other stock awards granted to you by the Company.] For further information about the vesting conditions applicable to the RSUs, please see the RSU Vesting Summary.
Jill I am looking forward to working closely with you.


	
	
	Uber on,




	
	
	/s/ Travis Kalanick

	Travis Kalanick

	 

	 

	Authorized Signatory






	
	
	/s/ Jill Hazelbaker

	Jill Hazelbaker

	 

	 

	cc: Liane Hornsey












































2
#### Dartha Cunningham et al., Appellants, v Adam E. Diers et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 669]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated March 17, 2003, which denied their motion, in effect, to vacate a prior order of the same court dated October 28, 2002, granting the defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the complaint, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to comply with a conditional order of dismissal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate their default in opposing the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, the plaintiffs were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious cause of action *(see Katsnelson v ELRAC, Inc.,*304 AD2d 619, 620 [2003]; *Gourdet v Hershfeld,*277 AD2d 422 [2000]). The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to oppose the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, or for their failure to comply with the conditional order of dismissal. Furthermore, the plaintiffs failed to submit any competent evidence establishing a meritorious cause of action *(see Uddin v Mirza,*10 AD3d 722 [2004]; *Gache v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*202 AD2d 470 [1994]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion to vacate. Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 11, 2020

NO. 03-20-00413-CV

M. A. R. G., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the de novo order signed by the trial court on August 13, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s de novo order. Therefore, the Court reverses that portion of the trial court’s de novo 

order concerning M.A.R.G.’s children; we affirm the trial court’s de novo order to the extent it 

concerns M.A.R.G.’s children’s half-sibling. We remand the case to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
www.nasa.gov | #Artemis SP-2023-10-1029-KSC

EXPLORATION GROUND SYSTEMS

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Artemis Emergency Egress System

In a launch pad emergency that requires astronauts 

to evacuate the Orion spacecraft, the crew and other 

personnel will use the emergency egress system

to leave Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s 

Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Emergency Egress Baskets

There are four emergency egress baskets. Once the crew and 

other personnel reach the perimeter of the launch pad, emergency 

transport vehicles will drive them safely away.

Catenary System

Similar to gondolas used for ski 

lifts, teams will use this catenary 

system to transport the baskets 

from the mobile launcher to the 

perimeter of the launch pad.

Each basket is similar 

in size to a small SUV

Able to carry up to five people. 

Each basket is designed 

for 1500 lbs.

Crew Access Point 

at 274-foot-level

1,335 ft. long cables

Pad Egress Area
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00158-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF E.C., A CHILD

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 125-393-2013

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On May 13, 2014, the trial court signed an order granting Appellees’

motion to strike the plea in intervention filed by L.G. L.G. filed a notice of appeal 

on May 20, 2014, challenging the order. On May 21, 2014, we notified the 

parties that it appeared the order striking L.G.’s plea in intervention was not a 

final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. See Metromedia Long 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1991, 

writ denied) (recognizing order dismissing or striking petition in intervention may 

not be appealed by intervenor before entry of final judgment). We instructed 

L.G., or any party desiring to continue the appeal, to respond no later than June 

2, 2014, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, and we warned that the 

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3, 44.3. No party responded. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: July 17, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Matthew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James M. Matthew                                 March 30, 2007
--------------------                                 --------------
James M. Matthew                                          Date
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)