alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2142 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2142

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 
                     Route, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL ROUTE.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 6 of Public Law 100-
515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$4,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$8,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``15''.
    (b) Grants.--Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in section 4, by inserting ``and, subject to the 
        availability of appropriations, grants for,'' after ``technical 
        assistance in''; and
            (2) in section 6(b)(2) by inserting ``and grants'' after 
        ``technical assistance''.
    (c) Strategic Plan.--Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 8. STRATEGIC PLAN.

    ``(a) In General.--Not later than 4 years after the date of the 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare a strategic plan 
for the route.
    ``(b) Contents.--The strategic plan prepared under subsection (a) 
shall describe--
            ``(1) opportunities to increase participation by national 
        and local private and public interests in the planning, 
        development, and administration of the route; and
            ``(2) organizational options for sustaining the route.''.

            Passed the Senate October 10, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2142

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 
                     Route, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>

                                     -108-


                                                                    Exhibit 13.2

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ART Advanced Research
Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Bedard, Chief Financial Officer of ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.,
certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ART
Advanced Research Technologies Inc.

Date: March 31, 2006

                                        ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC.


                                        (s) Jacques Bedard
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Jacques Bedard
                                        Title: Chief Financial Office
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANGELO C. SICA.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

LESTER RAY NICHOLS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 14-3041 

(D.C. No. 6:13-CR-10106-JTM-1) 

(D. Kansas) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before McHUGH, McKAY, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Nichols v. United States, 

136 S. Ct. 1113 (2016), we previously recalled the mandate and vacated the judgment in 

this case. The mandate recalled on May 6, 2016, is hereby reissued forthwith. We now 

remand to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for further 

proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. 

Entered for the Court 

Carolyn B. McHugh 

Circuit Judge 

 *

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of 

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

June 16, 2016

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3041 Document: 01019639388 Date Filed: 06/16/2016 Page: 1
IA 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2363 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2003 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To revise and extend the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 2363 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA. 

2 Section 401 of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 

3 (42 U.S.C. 13751 note) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘1,200’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘1,500’’; 

7 (B) by striking ‘‘4,000’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘5,000’’; and 

9 (C) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’; 

11 (2) in subsection (c)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2002, 

13 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010’’; and 

15 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

16 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

17 ‘‘1,200’’ and inserting ‘‘1,500’’; and 

18 (ii) in subparagraph (B)— 

19 (I) by striking ‘‘4,000’’ and in20 serting ‘‘5,000’’; and 

21 (II) by striking ‘‘2007’’ and in22 serting ‘‘2010’’; and 

23 (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (1) 

24 and inserting the following: 

25 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 

26 appropriated to carry out this section— 
3 

S 2363 RFH 

1 ‘‘(A) $80,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 

2 ‘‘(B) $85,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 

3 ‘‘(C) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; 

4 ‘‘(D) $95,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

5 and 

6 ‘‘(E) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.’’. 

Passed the Senate June 3, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Exhbit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  David  Ward, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Blue Moon Investments for the year ended
September 30, 2009(the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Blue  Moon
Investments.

Dated: January 13, 2010

/s/ David Ward
--------------
David Ward
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Blue Moon Investments

A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of  this  written
statement required by Section 906,  has  been provided to Blue Moon Investments
and will be retained by Blue Moon Investments  and  furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1992-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         223,870
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,361
<PP&E>                                         7,044,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,697,782)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,726,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,534
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,712,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,726,002
<SALES>                                        252,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,363
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,692<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
#### W. S. Mello *v.*Nancy Anderson's Heirs.

Judgment Constructively Vacated — New Trial Without Objection.

On a motion for a new trial, and to set aside a verdict and judgment rendered against appellant, no order appears to have been entered disposing of the motion, and the parties proceeded to try the issues again without regard to the former judgment: Held, that in the absence of

objection by the defendant on that ground, the former judgment was constructively vacated by subsequent proceeding, and defendant regarded as Having waived his right to said objections on the last trial and judgment.

January 14, 1868.

Appeal prom graves circuit court.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin :

• Although no order appears to have been entered setting aside the first verdict and judgment rendered in the case on the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial as the parties proceeded to try the issues again without regard to that judgment and the defendant interposed no objection on that ground or the motion for a new trial, it seems to us, said verdict and judgment for the defendant were constructively vacated by the subsequent proceedings, and the defendant should be regarded as having waived his right to-object on that ground to the last trial and judgment.

The instructions copied in the record are not identified or even referred to in the bill of exceptions, nor does it appear that they were the only instructions asked nor that others not copied in the record,-were not given. In fact the instructions copied are not *186so certified or'referred to by the court as to be regarded as part of the record. We cannot therefore adjudge that the court committed any error in its ruling as to instructions given or refused.

*Rodman & Bradley, for appellant.*

*Anderson, for appellee.*

The verdict of the jury appears to have been authorized by the evidence, and it seems to us that the defendant’s motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
#### DISHNER DEVELOPERS, INC. v. VICTORIA BROWN

No. 528A01

(Filed 18 December 2001)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 145 N.C. App. 375, 549 S.E.2d 904 (2001), affirming an order entered by Gavin, J., on 23 March 2000 in District Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 December 2001.

*Lapping & Lapping, by Sherwood F. Lapping, for plaintiffappellee.*

*Gill & Tobias, LLP, by Douglas R. Gill, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                 ANALOGY, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                                 IN THOUSANDS
                                     
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three months ended        Six months ended
                                              September 30,            September 30, 
                                          --------------------     --------------------
                                            1997        1996         1997        1996
                                          -------     --------     --------    --------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>          <C>         <C> 
Net income (loss)                          $  317      $  (932)     $   (93)   $ (1,641)
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------

Earnings (loss) per share                  $ 0.03      $ (0.11)     $ (0.01)   $  (0.20)
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------

Weighted average shares outstanding:
   Common stock                             9,171        8,356        9,149       8,334
   Common stock issuable upon exercise of
      stock options                           637           --           --          --
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------
Shares used in per share calculations       9,808        8,356        9,149       8,334
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------
                                          -------     --------      -------    --------

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.7
AMENDMENT TO NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN


The Belden Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan is amended by replacing "200"
in the first and second sentences of Paragraph 6 (Grant Formula) of the Stock
Plan with "500."
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONSI, Timothy J. McArdle, certify that: 1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of *MutualFirst*Financial, Inc.; 2.         Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c)         presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.Date: March 15, 2004By:/s/ Timothy J. McArdleTimothy J. McArdleTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)***
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

October 19, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Planet Labs 

PBC Reception on October 26, 2023 

On October 26, 2023, Planet Labs PBC will host a reception at the Scarlett Oak, 909 New 

Jersey Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. This is a reception 

following a briefing to Hill Staff on AI Revolution in Satellite Data. This event will provide 

an opportunity for those present to network with industry, government officials, and academia 

to continue discussions on this topic. Planet Labs is in control of all the arrangements and 

invitations for the event. 

Approximately 150 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, from federal 

agencies, and from industry. The estimated value of the event, including all food and drink, is 

approximately $35 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to 

exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). I 

further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event 

because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views 

pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest (if invited) to 

the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs 

any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the 

performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are 

required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only attend the event if 

they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of Planet Labs, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 
2

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

You are reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a), which provides that 

you may accept gifts valued at no more than $20 per occasion (and no more than $50 from 

one source in a calendar year). We understand that PBC will offer to guests small gift items 

of individual value below $10 (e.g. socks, rocks, glasses, pens, coasters) which NASA 

attendees other than NASA employees in non-career positions who have signed the ethics 

pledge may accept. An honor basket will be provided to reimburse for other gifts. 

Adam F. Greenstone
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 18, 2014, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Seoul, 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Bridgepoint Education, Inc., San Diego, CA; 
Intersective, Darlinghurst, AUSTRALIA; Kaywon University of Art & 
Design, Uiwing-si, Gyeonnggi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Poway Unified 
School District, Poway, CA; University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT; 
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD; and WEDU 
Communications Mapo-gu, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, Antioch University, Yellow Spring, OH; and National Institute 
of Multimedia Education (NIME), Mihama-ku, Chibu, JAPAN, have withdrawn 
as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 2, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 28, 2014 (79 FR 43781).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-24041 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P