alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Graham J. Siddall, Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





|Date: September 12, 2003                 
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/  GRAHAM J. SIDDALL                   
|                                         
|Graham J. Siddall Chief Executive
Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1439

PETER O. AGBRO; DEIDRA R. AGBRO,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

AMERICAN PARTNERS BANK; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; U. S. BANK, N.A., 

trustee for securitized trust; BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING 2006-6 TRUST; 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 

SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS); DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01606-GJH)

Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 26, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter O. Agbro, Deidra R. Agbro, Appellants Pro Se. Vanessa Destime, Edward 

Hutchinson Robbins, Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC, Melissa O. Martinez, 

MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Matthew Daniel Cohen, BWW LAW 

GROUP, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Peter O. Agbro and Deidra R. Agbro appeal the district court’s order dismissing 

their civil action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues 

raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Agbros’ informal brief 

does not challenge several dispositive bases for the district court’s disposition, they have 

forfeited appellate review of those findings. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, 

our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

*

 Accordingly, although we grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have reviewed the issues raised in the Agbros’ informal brief and discern no 

reversible error based on those claims.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Christman, President & Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|        |     |                                                                                                                       |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                             |        |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ JOHN R. CHRISTMAN                       |   |
|                                             |   |
|                                        |   |
| John R. Christman                           |   |
| President & Principal Executive Officer |   |
| August 14, 2003                             |   |

27
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-30356,333-67436, 333-113781, 333-88408, 333-104184, 333-67650, 333-110388) of Quovadx, Inc. of ourreports dated March 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Quovadx,Inc., Quovadx, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Quovadx, Inc.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/Ernst & Young, LLPDenver, Colorado
# Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

---

# Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Coastal Banking Company, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Randolph C. Kohn
Randolph C. KohnPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 26,2004

| |  | By: /s/ Charlie T. Lovering
Charlie T. LoveringChief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 26,2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 23, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 07-20134

Summary Calendar

_____________________

TRISHA L. WAKAT, as Administratrix of the

Estate of James Henry Mitchell; KATHY 

GUTIERREZ, as Next Friend of AM, Minor

Child of James Henry Mitchell; SHARON 

PATRICK, as Next Friend of JM and SM, Minor

Children of James Henry Mitchell,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

(4:05-CV-978)

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After James Henry Mitchell (“Decedent”) died on the morning of his

twelfth day in the Montgomery County Texas jail, the Administratrix of his

Estate and the next friends of his minor children instituted this action

against the County, the Sheriff’s Department, the former and current sheriffs
2

of the County, the Medical Director and physician for the inmates of the

County Jail, the Tri-County Mental Health Agency, and various John an Jane

Does, asserting constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Texas law

claims. After considerable proceedings and the accumulation of a large

record, the district court granted motions for summary judgment, dismissing

all federal claims against all defendants with prejudice and dismissing all

state law claims without prejudice. 

We have now reviewed with care the considerable record on appeal,

including the district court’s extensive Memorandum Opinion and Order

signed on January 12, 2007, and the facts and law as explicated in the

excellent appellate briefs filed by opposing counsel. As a result, we are in

complete agreement with the rulings of the district court and the reasons and

reasoning supporting those rulings; and we can see no reason for writing

substantively, as our doing so would merely replicate the writing of the

district court. We therefore incorporate herein by reference the aforesaid

Memorandum Opinion and Order of that court and affirm the rulings and

judgments of the district court in all respects. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rent-Way,
Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated:   August 9, 2002                     /s/William E. Morgenstern
                                                ----------------------
                                                William E. Morgenstern,
                                                Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   August 9, 2002                     /s/William A. McDonnell
                                                --------------------
                                                William A. McDonnell,
                                                Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLIE WADE POWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin, Senior

District Judge. (CR-88-193, CA-96-753-6)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Wade Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Powell, Nos. CR88-193; CA-96-753-6 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22 & Mar. 7, 1997). We further

deny Appellant's motion for a copy of the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CARRAMERICA
REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FROM CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000893577
<NAME>                        CarrAmerica Realty Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         37,990
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         2,094,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,351,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        903,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    88
<COMMON>                                       582
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,307,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,351,017
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,344
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                51,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            51,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                608
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   50,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.86

<FN>
<F1>
(1) Notes & accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts as the allowance is immaterial.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at September  30, 2000,  and its statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  for the nine  months
ended September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,762,102
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                   69,004
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         24,770,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,091,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,413,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,244,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,413,277
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,839,598
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,194,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,194,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,194,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.</FN>

</TABLE>
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Recovering the Planetary Exploration Program 

2013-01-03 (SC-Ol) 

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that in fonnulating its FY 2015 budget proposal, NASA seek 

restoration ofthe Planetary Science budget to a level consistent with Congressional action on 

the FY 2013 budget. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

The cuts to NASA's Planetary Science program in the Administration's proposed FY 2013 and 

FY 2014 budgets are disproportionately large, and Congressional action restored $223M ofthe 

$309M cut proposed in FY 2013. The intent ofCongressional action has not been included in 

fonnulating the FY 2014 budget, and the Planetary Science Division budget again faces a large 

$284M cut relative to FY 2012. 

Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 

The funds restored by Congress in the passed FY 2013 budget allowed continuation ofthe 

Outer Planets program, including studies of a Europa mission, continuation ofthe Division's 

fleet ofmissions currently inoperation, and maintenance ofthe launch rate of small- and 

medium-class missions. The proposed FY 2014 funding profile will result in effective 

tennination ofthe Outer Planets program, early tennination ofmissions currently in operation, 

and a serious decline in new mission launches over the decade threatening NASA's world 

leadership in planetary exploration. 

NASA Response: 

The FY 2014 budget request reflects difficult budget decisions in a very difficult budget 

environment that are consistent with the Administration's priorities. The FY 2013 budget 

process concluded very late this year, and the referenced changes in the FY 2013 budget were 

not signed into law until March 26,2013, after the FY 2014 budget request had been finalized 

and nearly six months into FY 2013. The FY 2013 enacted appropriation was also subject to a 

rescission and a reduction due to sequestration. These changes are reflected in the operations 

plan that was delivered to Congress in May 2013. NASA will use the approved FY 2013 

funding for Planetary Science and the outcome ofthe FY 2014 appropriations process to infonn 

its future planning with respect to the fonnulation ofthe FY 2015 budget request. 

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

October 3, 2014.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 16, 2014.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (entry from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Newmont USA Limited, 
Docket Nos. WEST 2010-652-RM, et al. (Issues include whether the 
Administrative Law Judge erred by ruling that a non-working area where 
a fan was turned off is an unventilated area that must be sealed or 
barricaded.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Sarah Stewart (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24115 Filed 10-6-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8505

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JAMES COURY HOLMES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:00-cr-00107-HMH-1)

Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Coury Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Coury Holmes appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Holmes’ motion was based on Amendment 709 to the Sentencing Guidelines, see USSG App. C, Supp., Amend. 709 (revising USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2)). Although the district court erroneously construed Holmes’ motion as one seeking relief under Amendment 706, we find the error harmless because Amendment 709 does not apply retroactively and therefore would not authorize a

reduction in Holmes’ sentence. See USSG § 1B1.10(c); United States v. Dunphy , 551 F.3d 247, 249 n.2 (4th Cir. 2009) (noting that an amendment to the Guidelines may be applied retroactively only when the amendment is expressly listed in USSG § 1B1.10(c)). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED