alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2015-10-28 09:03:23","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2015"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["AFRC","ARC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["2","15","4","18","56","13","31","18","5","16","3"," ","26","7"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["3","10","3","14","53","13","22","16","5","17","3"," ","32","4"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"," "," "," "," "," ","6"," ","1"," "," "," ","2"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2015","quarter":"Q4"}
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
March 5, 2014
N o. 04

- 14

- 00059

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.G., A CHILD , Fro m the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00345 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding


### ORDER In this accelerated appeal of the January 8, 201 4 order terminating A ppellant’s parental rights, A ppellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on March 3 , 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On the brief’s due date , A ppellant filed a n unopposed first motion for extension of time to file A ppellant’s brief and requested an additional twenty days. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court not later than March 24 , 201 4

. See id. ; see also T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2, available at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/MiscDocket/11/11925100.pdf (directing courts of appeals to dispose of SAPCR suits “[w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed”).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### William Threlkeld *v.*James H. Jones.

Decretal Sale of Land — Necessary Parties.

A decretal sale of land will not be set aside, where the party complaining has failed to bring in a party when it was his duty to do so.

APPEAL EEOM MEECEE CIRCUIT COUET.

October 8, 1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson :

We presume, that under the decretal sale, the land was bought for the vendor, W. Threlkeld, and, therefore, as no lien which Samuel M. J ones may have had would be affected by the sale he does not appear to have been prejudiced by the decree. Moreover, he did not offer to intervene, nor did Threlkeld in his cross-petition or otherwise require him to be made a party. And, therefore, and especially as the appellant, J. H. Jones, cannot be presumed to have had notice of S. M. Jones’ subsequent lien, except from the suggestion to that effect in Threlkeld’s answer, we cannot reverse the decree of sale and set aside the sale merely because the appellee S. M. Jones did not make S. M. Jones a defendant, which it seems to us it was not his duty to do. Nor, as Threlkeld did not make S. M. Jones a party, can he complain.

Nor do we see any other error in the decree.

The lien enforced by the decree was expressly and properly reserved in Solomon Jones’ deed to Coleman, who conveyed after its registration to Threlkeld, and the amount and manner of the decree seem to be right, and the sale regular.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
#### ALVIN S. TRENK v. BENEFIT PLAN ADMINISTRATORS, INC.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1450

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia in No. 1:04-cv-01785-PLF, Judge 

Paul A. Friedman.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

R. TREVOR CARTER, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ANDREW M. MCCOY; TROY EDWIN GRABOW, EDWARD 

NAIDICH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & 

Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC.

KURT LOUIS GLITZENSTEIN, Fish & Richardson P.C., 

Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW KOPSIDAS, Washington, DC; JOHN A.

DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN.
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 5, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, (theReport), I,
William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ William P. Hales
William P. HalesPresident and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

May 16, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

22

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,510
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,811
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,510
<SALES>                                         15,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,000
<CGS>                                           11,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               361,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (357,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (357,722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2128 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2128

To define the term ``natural born Citizen'' as used in the Constitution 
    of the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of 
                               President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2004

Mr. Nickles (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To define the term ``natural born Citizen'' as used in the Constitution 
    of the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of 
                               President.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Natural Born Citizen Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ``NATURAL BORN CITIZEN''.

    (a) In General.--Congress finds and declares that the term 
``natural born Citizen'' in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the 
Constitution of the United States means--
            (1) any person born in the United States and subject to the 
        jurisdiction thereof; and
            (2) any person born outside the United States--
                    (A) who derives citizenship at birth from a United 
                States citizen parent or parents pursuant to an Act of 
                Congress; or
                    (B) who is adopted by 18 years of age by a United 
                States citizen parent or parents who are otherwise 
                eligible to transmit citizenship to a biological child 
                pursuant to an Act of Congress.
    (b) United States.--In this section, the term ``United States'', 
when used in a geographic sense, means the several States of the United 
States and the District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNV912000.L16400000.PH0000.006F 241A; 11-08807; TAS: 14X1109]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada has cancelled a joint meeting of its three Resource Advisory Councils (RACs) previously scheduled to be held on November 4 and 5, 2010 in Sparks, Nevada. The meeting will be rescheduled in early 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rochelle Francisco,                         *telephone:*                         (775) 861-6588,                         *e-mail: rochelle_francisco@blm.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Nevada RACs advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM Nevada State Director, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Nevada.

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Doran Sanchez,

Chief, Office of Communications, BLM Nevada.

[FR Doc. 2010-27355 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN WAYNE REYNOLDS.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  ATEL  Cash
Distribution Fund V, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the entity,  particularly during the period in which
     this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected or is  reasonably  likely to
     materially   affect  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.



Date:
August 11, 2004

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Principal Financial Officer of Registrant, Executive
Vice President of General Partner
M A N D A T E

TO THE 206TH DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 4th day of

December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Jose Fernando Cervantes, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00134-CR (Tr.Ct.No. CR-1286-12-D)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 24th day of February, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wise, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jeffrey A. Wise

---

Jeffrey A. Wise

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer



November 14, 2005



25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              MAY-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          16,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    211,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               445,900
<PP&E>                                       1,501,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (314,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,814,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          616,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     246,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,814,300
<SALES>                                        542,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,800
<CGS>                                          458,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 7, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Pertl,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| October 10,  2003 |                                                |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|              | /s/ David E.  Pertl                                 |   |
|              | David E. Pertl                                      |
|              | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----