alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Noah Guidry,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03711-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8325 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VINCENT JAMES LANDANO.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 11**

**CODE OF ETHICS**

**RADWARE LTD.**

**Code of EthicsforDirectors, Officers and Employees**

Introduction. 

This Code of Ethics for directors, officers and employees has been adopted by the Board of Directors of Radware Ltd. to promote honest and ethical conduct, proper disclosure of information in the Corporation’s periodic reports, and compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations by the Corporation’s directors, officers and employees. 

Principles and Practices.

In performing his or her duties, each director, officer and employee must: 

(1) maintain high standards of honest and ethical conduct and avoid any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; 

(2) report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors any conflict of interest that may arise and any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict; 

(3) provide, or cause to be provided, full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Corporation files with or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications; 

(4) comply and take all reasonable actions to cause others to comply with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations; and 

(5) promptly report violations of this Code to the Audit Committee. 

Directors, officers and employees must also comply with the guidelines and requirements set forth in the Corporation’s Employee Guidebook and written procedures.

Waiver. 

Any request for a waiver of any provision of this Code for a director or executive officer must be in writing and addressed to the Board of Directors.

Compliance and Accountability. 

The Audit Committee will assess compliance with this Code, report material violations to the Board of Directors, and recommend to the Board appropriate action.

APPROVED FEBRUARY 2, 2004 

85

----
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STEVEN LAMANNA AND WILLIAM MICHAEL DICKSON.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24235]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 6, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Sumitomo Mitsui 
Banking Corporation, both in Tokyo, Japan; to acquire at least an 
additional 10 percent, for a total of 19.9 percent of the voting shares 
of The Bank of East Asia, Limited, Hong Kong S.A.R., Peoples Republic 
of China, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
The Bank of East Asia (U.S.A.), N.A., New York, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Sterling Bancshares, Inc., Poplar Bluff, Missouri; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Bootheel Bancorp, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of First Community Bank, both in 
Poplar Bluff, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 7, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-24235 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of James A. Swiech, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 866]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a New York utility company for over 19 years. His job required him to work outside on lines and poles throughout the year, including during the winter. After selling his home in September 2003, claimant left his job and relocated to Florida. He applied for unemployment insurance benefits, claiming that he left his job for health reasons. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied his application, finding that he was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause, prompting this appeal.

Claimant admitted that, although he suffered from arthritis and his doctors advised him that a warmer climate would reduce his joint pain, he did not receive medical advice to leave his job. In fact, claimant did not actually move to Florida until more than one year after receiving this information and stated that he did so largely because he had just sold his home. The employer’s representative testified that continuing work was available and claimant could have bid for an inside job. Notably, claimant conceded that he could still perform his job even if it was uncomfortable. Under these circumstances, the Board properly concluded that claimant left his employment for personal and noncompelling reasons (see *Matter of Grushko [Lonero Tr.—Commissioner of Labor],*6 AD3d 858, 859 [2004]; *Matter of Torres [Unlimited Care—Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 857, 857-858 [1999]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
10:15 to 10:20 AM Welcome and Announcements

10:20 to 11:20 AM Future of Vehicle Technology Development 

11:20 AM to 12:30 PM Future of Flight Demonstrations

12:30 to 1:30 PM Lunch (non-public)

1:30 to 3:30 PM NASA Support to Certification 

3:30 to 3:35 PM Public Comment Period

3:35 to 4:00 PM Committee Deliberations

4:00 to 4:30 PM Work Plan and Schedule Review 

4:30 PM Adjourn

JOIN TEAMS MEETING Click here to join the meeting 

6-Jun-23

Meeting number: 215 658 114 820 

Meeting password: 8ja8Nr

JOIN BY PHONE (Audio Only) +1 256-715-9946,,369593767#

Phone Conference ID: 369 593 767# 

300 E Street SW, Washington, DC

Room 6E40

Tuesday, June 6 (Sessions are public except as noted)

NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda (FINAL)

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

NASA Headquarters
M&F BANCORP, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY



Exhibit 23(b)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement No. 333-95973 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2006, relating to the financial statements of M&F Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of M&F Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP
|Raleigh, NC                
|December 31, 2007          



79
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

December 14, 2023

Reply to Attn of: Space Operations Mission Directorate

TO: Goddard Space Flight Center

Associate Director for Flight Projects

FROM: Space Communications and Navigation

Deputy Program Manager for Operations

SUBJECT: Direct-to-Earth Assets Reimbursable for Fiscal Year 2024

Effective October 1, 2023, the rates for the Direct-to-Earth (DTE) Assets Reimbursable 

support for Fiscal Year 2024 are as follows:

S-band, X- band, and/or Ka-band forward/command, return/telemetry, and tracking

services:

• $550.00 per pass, where one pass is ≤ 30 minutes of service/contact time

• Small Aperture Stations (3-5 meter): $100.00 per pass, where one pass is ≤ 30 

minutes of service/contact time

The rates are equivalent to the Fiscal Year 2023 rates and will remain in effect until further 

notice.

For additional information please contact Philip Baldwin by email at 

philip.j.baldwin@nasa.gov or by phone at (202) 358-1985.

X

Philip Baldwin
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Unblocking of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons 
Pursuant to Cuban Assets Control Regulations

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of two vessels whose property 
and interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to the Cuban 
Assets Control Regulations, 31 CFR part 515.

DATES: The unblocking and removal from the list of Specially Designated 
Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) of the two vessels identified 
in this notice whose property and interests in property were blocked 
pursuant to Cuban Assets Control Regulations, is effective on September 
30, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant Director, Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign 
Assets Control, Washington, DC 20220, Tel: (202) 622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC is 
available from OFAC's Web site (www.treasury.gov/ofac). Certain general 
information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is also available 
via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, tel.: 202/622-
0077.

Background

    On September 30, 2014, the Director of OFAC removed from the SDN 
List the two vessels listed below, whose property and interests in 
property were blocked pursuant to Cuban Assets Control Regulations:

Vessels

    1. EAST ISLANDS (C4QB) General Cargo 15,120DWT 8,996GRT Cyprus flag 
(EAST ISLAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. (SDN)) (vessel) [CUBA].
    2. SOUTH ISLANDS (C4AN) General Cargo 15,147DWT 8,996GRT Cyprus 
flag (SOUTH ISLAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. (SDN)) (vessel) [CUBA].

    Dated: September 30, 2014.
John Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2014-24055 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2267 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2267

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 29(k) of the Small Business Act to establish funding 
                priorities for women's business centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Sustainability Recovery Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 29(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
656(k)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Funding priority.--Subject to available 
                funds, and reservation of funds, the Administration 
                shall, for fiscal year 2004, allocate--
                            ``(i) $150,000 for each eligible women's 
                        business center established under subsection 
                        (b), except for centers that request a lesser 
                        amount;
                            ``(ii) from the funds reserved under 
                        paragraph (4)(A), not more than $125,000 to 
                        each eligible women's business center 
                        established under subsection (l); and
                            ``(iii) any funds remaining after 
                        allocations are made under clauses (i) and (ii) 
                        to new eligible women's business centers and 
                        eligible women's business centers that did not 
                        receive funding in the prior fiscal year under 
                        subsection (b).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                            ``(v) For fiscal year 2004, 48 percent.''.
    (b) Sunset Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) are 
repealed on October 1, 2004.

            Passed the Senate April 29, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2267

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend section 29(k) of the Small Business Act to establish funding 
                priorities for women's business centers.
```
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

March 15, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Ball 

Aerospace Kinship Reception on March 15, 2023. 

On March 15, 2023, Ball Aerospace will host a reception at the Kinship/Métier Restaurant, 

1015 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C., 20001 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The event is to 

provide a forum for discussion on innovation and technology. Ball Aerospace is in control of 

all the arrangements and invitations for the event. 

Approximately 50 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include members from the legislative branch, personnel from 

federal agencies, and industry representatives. The estimated value of the event, including all 

food and drink, is approximately $30 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA 

attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event 

meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA 

personnel attend the event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to 

exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest (if invited) to 

the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs 

any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the 

performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are 

required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only attend the event if 

they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the Ball Aerospace, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 
2

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are 

reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUAN JUAREZ-MORENO, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4109

(D.C. No. 2:12-CR-00644-TS-RTB-1)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before us on the government’s Motion to Dismiss. The government 

seeks to dismiss this direct criminal appeal, filed by the defendant Juan Juarez-Moreno, 

on timeliness grounds. Counsel for Mr. Juarez-Moreno concedes that the notice of 

appeal was untimely.

In a criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed in the district court within 14 

days after entry of the judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). Although the district court 

may grant an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal, this extension may not 

exceed 30 days from the original deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(b)(4). 

In the instant case, the district court entered judgment against Mr. Juarez-Moreno 

on March 6, 2014, making the notice of appeal due no later than March 20, 2014. Even if 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 29, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4109 Document: 01019377721 Date Filed: 01/29/2015 Page: 1 
2

the district court had granted the maximum extension of time allowed under the rules, the

time for filing the notice of appeal would have expired in April of 2014. Mr. JuarezMoreno filed his notice of appeal on September 9, 2014, well beyond the deadline for 

filing an appeal.

The timely filing of a notice of appeal by the defendant in a criminal case is an 

inflexible claim-processing rule that may be forfeited if not properly raised by the 

government. United States v. Garduño, 506 F.3d 1287, 1290-91 (10th Cir. 2007). If 

properly raised, however, we must grant relief. United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 

744 (10th Cir 2008) (citing Garduño, 506 F.3d at 1290-91). Because the government has 

properly invoked the time bar in Rule 4(b), and we agree that the notice of appeal was 

untimely, the government’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. 

Appeal dismissed.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Jane K. Castro

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-4109 Document: 01019377721 Date Filed: 01/29/2015 Page: 2
#### ROSEANN BARBARIA v. TOWNSHIP OF SAYREVILLE AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

June 19, 1984.

The Court having advised that the parties have settled the within matter, and consideration of the merits of the determination of the Appellate Division not, therefore, being appropriate, it is ORDERED that the petition for certification is dismissed as moot.
**Exhibit 10.57**

 

MID-PENINSULA BANK

 

April 25, 2002

 

David E. Pertl, Senior Vice President &CFO

Fresh Choice, Inc.

485 Cochrane Circle

Morgan Hill, Ca  95037

 

Re: Revolving Loan Agreement (and RelatedDocuments) dated October 5, 2001 and Promissory Note (supporting Letter ofCredit SBLC 10813) dated March 11, 2002 each between Fresh Choice, Inc. andMid-Peninsula Bank.

 

Dear Mr. Pertl,

 

I am writing to acknowledge receipt andMid-Peninsula Bank’s acceptance of the Promissory Note referenced above alongwith the related Corporate Resolution to Borrow.

 

As we have discussed, this Promissory Notewill support SBLC 10813 (each in the amount of $955,600) as a commitment byMid-Peninsula Bank separate from Fresh Choice’s revolving line that is furtherdescribed in the Revolving Loan Agreement.

 

Currently the revolving line provides fordrawing by Fresh Choice, Inc. of up to $2,000,000.  At present no amount is outstanding; and accordingly the full$2,000,000 is now available to Fresh Choice, Inc., as of this date, subject tothe terms of the above referenced Promissory Note.

 

 

Very truly yours,

 
| // Jonas H Stafford   |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| Jonas H. Stafford     |
| Senior Vice President |