alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.2

              STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          SIX MONTHS
                                                                                        ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                                                        --------------

                                                                       1996                                1997
                                                                       ----                                ----
<S>                                                             <C>                                    <C>
Net income (loss)                                               $    768,791                           $  (222,941)

Reduction of interest expense                                         50,272                                     -

Interest income                                                       51,325                                     -
                                                                ------------                           -----------

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock and
  common stock equivalents                                       $   870,388                           $  (222,941)
                                                                 ===========                           ===========

Weighted average shares of common stock
  outstanding                                                     12,676,312                            22,479,679

Escrowed shares                                                     (291,663)                             (291,663)

Weighted average effect of common stock
  equivalents                                                     10,823,938                                     -
                                                                  ----------                            ----------

Net shares of common stock and common stock
  equivalents used in net income (loss) per share                 23,208,587                            22,188,016
                                                                  ==========                            ==========

Net income (loss) per share                                          $   .04                                 $(.01)
                                                                    ========                               =======
</TABLE>
NASA’s Vision from the 2011 Strategic Plan: 

To reach for new heights

and

reveal the unknown 

so that 

what we do and learn 

will 

benefit all humankind
FY 2012 Budget Request

Budget Authority ($M) FY 2

Science 

Aeronautics Space Technology Exploration Systems Space Operations 

Education Cross-Agency Support CoF and ECR Inspector General NASA FY 2012 

The FY 2012 Budget provides $18.7 billion in 2

for NASA to support a diverse portfolio of prog

even in austere times.
NASA Budget

Human 

Spaceflight

Education

1%

Other 

(CAS; CECR; IG)

21%

Space Technologies

(non-human spaceflight portion)

3%

Spaceflight

44%

Science

28%

Aeronautics

3%
NASA Programmatic Budge

Human 

Spaceflight Science 35%

Aeronautics

4%

Education

1%

Space Technologies

(non-human spaceflight portion

3%

Spaceflight

57%

35%
NASA Human Spaceflight Bud

Deep Space 

International 

Space Station

40%

vehicles (SLS; 

MPCV)

39%

Commercial 

Spaceflight Shuttle 12%

retirement & 

disposition

9%
NASA Science Budget

Earth Science

Planetary 

Science

31%

Astrophysic

14%

Earth Science

36%

JWST

7%

Heliophysics

12%

*Plus ~$1.2B for reimbursable 

Earth Science work at GSFC
Summary

The FY 2012 Budget funds:

 All major elements of the NASA Authorization Act of 2010, in

development of a heavy-lift launch vehicle and deep-space cin an affordable and sustainable manner. 

 Key components of the Nation’s priorities – Innovate. Supports long-term job growth and a vibrant e

increasing investment in research, technology, and devel

– Educate. Uses NASA content to educate and inspire Am

future workforce. – Build. Invests in American industry and lessens our reliaforeign providers by facilitating development of US-providcommercial access to low Earth orbit and the InternationaStation, our long-term platform for human space flight. 

 To fund key priorities like safely sustaining our U.S. presence 

tough choices were made, including reductions to Earth scienadministrative costs, elimination of exploration focused robotiand maintaining the heavy-lift vehicle and crew capsule at apthe 2011 authorized level.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

AARON IVAN JORDAN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER SLOAN, Aurora P.O., 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-1501

(D.C. No. 1:14-CV-00185-REB-MJW)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

The plaintiff has waived the right to appellate review of the district court dismissal 

because he failed to file objections to the magistrate’s report and recommendation. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 

Failure to properly object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation results in 

waiver of appellate review of both factual and legal issues. Moore v. United States, 950 

F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); Niehaus v. Kansas Bar Ass’n, 793 F.2d 1159, 1164-65 

(10th Cir. 1986). This rule applies to pro se parties where, as here, they were “properly 

informed of the consequences of [their] failure to object.” Fottler v. United States, 73 

F.3d 1064, 1065 (10th Cir. 1996).

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 30, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-1501 Document: 01019378527 Date Filed: 01/30/2015 Page: 1 
2

APPEAL DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Ellen Rich Reiter

 Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 14-1501 Document: 01019378527 Date Filed: 01/30/2015 Page: 2
##### 



Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant Date and % of VotingShares, PartnershipInterests, Voting TrustYear &
    
    Certificates, CapitalName & Address
    
    State Inc.
    
    Contributions
    
    Description of ActivityHome Federal Savings Bank
    
    1934
    
    6/29/94
    
    Federally Chartered Stock Savings Bank1016 Civic Center Drive NW
    
    Federal
    
    HMN owns 100% of votingRochester, MN 55901
    
    Charter
    
    sharesOsterud Insurance Agency, Inc.
    
    1983
    
    12/1983
    
    Investment products and financial planningDBA Home Federal Investment Svcs.
    
    MN
    
    Bank owns 100%1016 Civic Center Drive NWRochester, MN 55901Home Federal Holding, Inc.
    
    2002
    
    2/4/2002
    
    Holding company for real estate investment trustCardinal Avenue
    
    DE
    
    Home Federal owns 100%Grand Cayman
    
    
    
    of voting sharesCayman Islands, BWIHome Federal REIT
    
    2002
    
    2/4/2002
    
    Invests in real estate loans acquired from Bank1016 Civic Center Drive NW
    
    DE
    
    Home Federal owns 100%Rochester, MN 55901
    
    
    
    of voting sharesSecurity Finance Corporation
    
    1929
    
    12/29/95
    
    Corporation invests in securities and loans1016 Civic Center Drive NW
    
    MN
    
    HMN owns 100% ofRochester, MN 55901
    
    
    
    voting shares