alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-14-034]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

October 14, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000

# STATUS:

Open to the public

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

                        4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-502 and 731-TA-1227 (Final)(Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico and Turkey). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its                               ( print page 61340)                            determinations and views of the Commission on October 23, 2014.                    

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 7, 2014.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-24313 Filed 10-8-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**EXHIBIT 23**

****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS****

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (File No. 333-53600) of MutualFirst Financial, Inc.'s 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan and 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan on Form S-8 of our report dated February 4, 2005 of our audits of the consolidated financial statements of MutualFirst Financial, Inc as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, which report is incorporated by reference in MutualFirst Financial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ BKD, LLP
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

STS-132 Atlantis

www.nasa.gov

The mission:

Space shuttle Atlantis’ six crew 

members will deliver the 

Russian-built Mini-Research 

Module-1, or MRM-1, and an 

integrated cargo carrier to the 

International Space Station.

During the 12-day flight, the 

STS-132 mission specialists will 

perform three spacewalks to 

attach the MRM-1 to the 

Earth-facing port of the Zarya 

control module. The MRM-1 will 

be used for cargo storage and will 

provide an additional docking port 

to the station. 

The cargo carrier will be used to 

support the transfer of exterior 

cargo from the shuttle to the 

space station. 

STS-132 is Atlantis’ 32nd flight, 

the 132nd shuttle mission and the 

34th shuttle flight to the space 

station. This also is the 150th 

launch from Launch Complex 39. 

This includes 132 shuttle launches, 

17 Saturn launches and 

one Ares I-X flight test.

 

The crew:

Commander Ken Ham will lead the 

six-member crew on his second 

spaceflight. 

Tony Antonelli will serve as pilot 

on his second spaceflight. 

Mission specialists are 

Michael Good, Garrett Reisman, 

Piers Sellers and Steve Bowen.
Dr. Jade Spurgeon 

Director of Health & Medical 

Systems

Dr. Angel Plaza

Senior Environmental 

Health Officer 

(SEHO)

Bart Geyer

Industrial 

Hygiene

Layza IrizarryColon

Industrial 

Hygiene

Jamie Gurney

Health 

Physics/Lasers

Michael 

McPherson

Food Safety

Dr. Dan 

Newfang

Deputy SEHO

Erin Jensen

Program 

Manager

Matty Budesa

Administrative

Dr. Olga 

Emgushov

Senior Medical 

Officer (SMO)

Papiya Ray

Occupational 

Medical 

Physician

Regina 

Chisholm

Nursing

Hanna Bogner

Health Promotions, 

Fitness & Employee 

Assistance Program 

(EAP)

Dr. Rafiq

Director of Medical 

Informatics (DMI)

Nancy 

Eckhardt

Health IT

Rob McIntosh

Health IT

W. Kaine

Wilson

Health IT

OCHMO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH TEAM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID MATTHEW ORTIZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 344

- C R

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20140D05092 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant’s Reply Brief second motion for extension of time

within which to file the brief until March 13 , 201 7

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE THE APPELL ANT ’S REPLY BR IEF WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jim Darnell , the Appell ant ’s Attorney , prepare the

Appell ant ’s reply brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 13 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of January , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

s0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140066

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140066 COA: 286878 Kent CC: 08-001401-FH PATRICK MICHAEL BASKIN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 29, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated January 30, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and included in the Annual Report of Findwhat.com and
Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of Findwhat.com and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-46008,
effective date September 18, 2000 and SEC File No. 333-66434, effective date
August 1, 2001) and on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-76144, effective date December
31, 2001, SEC File No. 333-47240, effective date May 3, 2001 and SEC File No.
333-102436, effective January 9, 2003).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

GRANT THORNTON LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 7, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,217,436
<SECURITIES>                                   549,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,183,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                   366,277
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,293,401
<PP&E>                                      10,476,703
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,755,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,691,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,584,225
<BONDS>                                      2,010,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,413
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,512,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,691,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,114,803
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,853,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,694,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,398,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (545,307)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (852,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (852,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)













</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-11598 and 333-72320) pertaining to the 1990
Share Option Scheme, the 1997 Share Option Scheme, the 1998 Directors and Consultants Option Scheme, the Exceptis Share Option Scheme, the 1999 Employee Savings Related Share Option Scheme and the 1999 U.S. Employee Share Purchase Plan of Trintech
Group PLC of our report dated February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Trintech Group PLC included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended January 31, 2005.





| |  |                 
| |  | ----------------
| |  | /s/Ernst & Young



Dublin, Ireland

May 16, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Essie Grant, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 878]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J., at plea; Nicholas Iacovetta, J., at sentence), rendered December 17, 2003, convicting defendant of assault in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

*449As the People commendably concede, since the crime was committed before the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [e]) providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed *(see People v Reeves,*6 AD3d 231 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the information by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8(SEC File No. 333-38680) of our report dated May 15, 2000, except for
the third paragraph of Note 13, for which the date is June 8, 2000, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of inChorus.com (formerly known as
Softlink, Inc.) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March 31, 2000. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding
inChorus.com's ability to continue as a going concern.


/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

San Jose, California
June 29, 2000
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Langley Research Center 

100 NASA Road 

Hampton, VA 23681-2199 

February 2, 2024 

Reply to Attn of: 30/Office of General Counsel 

TO: Office of Director 

FROM: Chief Counsel 

SUBJECT: Ethics Determination Regarding NASA Employee Attendance at the 2024 VABA 

Aviation, Aerospace and Advanced Air Mobility Legislative Reception, 

Wednesday, February 7, 2024 

On February 7, 2024, the Virginia Aviation Business Association (VABA) will host a reception 

and exhibit hall. This event will be held at Main Street Station, Richmond, Virginia. 

VABA expects at least 500 people to attend, including NASA employees, military and civilian 

employees of other federal agencies, government support contractors, industry partners, 

educators, state and local community leaders, state elected officials, and members of the public. 

Historically, approximately 50 NASA employees have attended this annual event. 

The event will include remarks by the Virginia Governor and an exhibit hall for attendees to 

visit. There will be ample opportunities to network among the invited guests. The reception will 

include food and beverages with a registration cost of $100 per person. 

In addition to VABA hosting this event, the sponsors will include Science Applications 

International Corporation, the Virginia Spaceport Authority, KBR, Signature Aviation, Science 

Systems and Applications, Inc., the Virginia Institute for Spaceflight & Autonomy, and others. 

In accordance with 5 C.F.R. §2635.204(g) and 14 C.F.R. §1207.103, I find that this event meets 

the definition of a “widely attended gathering.” I also find that there is an Agency interest in 

having invited NASA personnel attend this event, as it will further agency programs and 

interests. NASA invitees will have the opportunity to discuss the Administration’s activities in 

Virginia, and exchange information on NASA programs. I further conclude that NASA’s interest 

in its employees attending this event outweighs any concern that attendance may appear to 

improperly influence NASA personnel in the performance of their official duties. 

Accordingly, NASA employees who have been invited to attend may accept free attendance at 

the reception. 
NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending sensitive matter that will 

substantially affect the interests of the host and sponsors, and NASA employees who have noncareer political appointments, are not covered by this determination, and should seek a 

determination from their ethics counselor regarding their participation in this event. 

Questions about this ethics determination may be addressed to Rob Ayers at 757-864-7522 or 

robert.w.ayers@nasa.gov. 

Andrea Z. Warmbier 

Chief Counsel
#### STATE v. HALL

No. 372P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 717

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 August 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 August 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the Form 10-KSB for the period ended  12-31-99, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,790
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,490
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            642,137
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 304,490
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,440
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,440
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                343,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (337,659)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (337,659)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (28,138)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (28,138)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Transformed Structu

Chief Information 

Officer

Chief

Engineer

Institutions &Management 

Chief Education

Officer

Chief Financial

Officer

MISSION SUPPORT

MISSION

Exploration

Systems

Space 

Operations Science 

Inspector General

Deputy

Administrator

(Chief Operating Officer)

Chief Safety & Mission 

Assurance Officer

Chief of S

Administrator

• Human Resources• Institutional & Corporate Ma• Equal Opportunity Program• Security Management & Sa

* In accordance with law, theOEOP and SDBU maintain reporting relationships to the Deputy and the Administrator.** Including a new emphasis on internal communications

• Procurement• Small & Disadvantaged 

Business Utilization*

• Independent 

Technical Authority

• Ames• Goddard• Jet Propulsion Laborato

• Johnson• Kennedy• Marshall• Stennis
**EXHIBIT
      23**





**CONSENT
      OF ACCOUNTANTS**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File
      No. 333-53600) of *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc.’s 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan and 2000 Stock Option and
      Incentive Plan on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 7, 2008 on the
      consolidated financial statements of *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three
      years
      in the period ended December 31, 2007, and on our audit of internal control
      over
      financial reporting of the *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, which reports are incorporated by
      reference in *MutualFirst* Financial, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/
      BKD,
      LLP





Indianapolis,
      Indiana


March
      13,
      2008
EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46008 and 333-66434) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan and the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended on June 11, 2001), Form S-3
(Nos. 333-110067, 333-102436, 333-76144), and Form SB-2 (No. 333-47240) and
related prospectuses of our report dated February 9, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Findwhat.com included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
March 1, 2004
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132811 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132811 COA: 261377 Macomb CC: 04-002102-FC ANTOINE DESHAWN HINES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
#### Thomas Weller *v.*Thomas J. Perry.

Deeds — Mistake in Drafting — Intention of Donor.

A father intending to divide all his lands to his children, Instructed his draftsman, to make out deeds to each of his daughters. Only one of the deeds was read over to him before signing all. Afterwards it was discovered that one of the deeds was made to the husband of one of the daughters and this only shortly before her death. The property was recognized by the husband, as belonging to his wife, during her life: Held to be such a mistake as will authorize the court to cancel the deed to the husband.

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT. '

October 15, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

It is very clear that the appellant intended and thought he had conveyed the 147 acres of land to his daughter Catherine Perry, wife of the appellee, he instructed the draftsman to draw the deed to his daughter so they would have the land and right to control it but that through the hurry and inadvertance this deed was made to the husband.

The father being old, infirm and indisposed desired to divide his lands among his children and had it partitioned by actual *512surveys for that purpose, the other deeds, made at the same time and for the same reasons, are made to the daughters and not their husbands, only one deed was read to him; when supposing all to be alike, which was really intended by the draftsman, he signed and acknowledged all; there is no proven or perceptible reason why this one should have been intentionally made to the husband.

Gofer, *for appellant.*

Read, *for appellee.*

The recognition of the husband during his wife’s life that the deed was erroneously made to him instead of his wife through mistake fortifies the evidence of the draftsman that such was his instruction -and 'intention beside the intrinsic probabilities strongly indicate the same thing.

As the wife lived only about a year after the making of the deed no fatal presumption arises from a delay to bring this suit until a short time after her death inasmuch as the donor did not know of the mistake until just before, or about the time of her decease, and even if he had sooner discovered it his ill health would explain this short delay. It is well settled a» heretofore decided in various cases by this and other courts that deéds as well as other written agreements may be reformed for fraud or mistake and the mistake clearly appearing in this case the deed should be reformed.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing the petition is reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.