alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2143

To extend trade adjustment assistance to service workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2004

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To extend trade adjustment assistance to service workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Workers Fair5 ness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 

7 TO SERVICE WORKERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

9 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR SERVICE WORKERS.—A 

12 group of service workers in a firm or subdivision of a firm 
2

•S 2143 IS 

1 may file a petition under this chapter and shall be certified 

2 by the Secretary as eligible to apply for adjustment assist3 ance under this chapter pursuant to a petition filed under 

4 section 221 if the Secretary determines that— 

5 ‘‘(1) the workers meet the requirements of sub6 section (a)(1); and 

7 ‘‘(2)(A) there has been a shift, by such workers’ 

8 firm or subdivision to a foreign country of the provi9 sion of services like or directly competitive with the 

10 services which are provided by such firm or subdivi11 sion; or 

12 (B) the workers’ firm or subdivision of the firm 

13 contracted with another firm or subdivision to pro14 vide services like or directly competitive with services 

15 that have been shifted by such other firm or subdivi16 sion to a foreign country.’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

18 (1) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 222 of the Trade 

19 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272) is amended— 

20 (A) in subsection (b)— 

21 (i) in paragraph (2)—

22 (I) by inserting ‘‘or service’’ after 

23 ‘‘related to the article’’; and 

24 (II) by inserting ‘‘or subsection 

25 (d)’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 
3

•S 2143 IS 

1 (ii) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting 

2 ‘‘or services’’ after ‘‘component parts’’; 

3 (B) in subsection (c), in paragraph (3)— 

4 (i) by inserting ‘‘or services’’ after 

5 ‘‘value-added production processes’’; 

6 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or services’’ after 

7 ‘‘for articles’’; and 

8 (iii) by inserting ‘‘or subsection (d)’’ 

9 after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 

10 (C) in subsection (c), in paragraph (4)—

11 (i) by striking ‘‘for articles’’ and in12 serting ‘‘, or provides services, for articles 

13 or services’’; and 

14 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or subsection (d)’’ 

15 after ‘‘subsection (a)’’. 

16 (2) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 245(a) 

17 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2317(a)) is 

18 amended by striking ‘‘, other than subchapter D’’.

Æ
#### Wyatt *v.*Noble.—In error.

THE right to challenge a juror peremptorily, either in a civil or criminal case, may be exercised at any time before the juror is sworn to try the issue. *Beauchamp*v. *The State,*6 Blackf. *299.*— Munly v. *The State,*7 *id. 593.*— Jackson v. *Pittsford, Nov.*term, 1846.
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 Company   Participant
 Plan
 Committee
  Award
 Grant  Restricted
Stock Stock
 Plan Incorporated
 Statement of Election
 Risk of Forfeiture (Forfeiture Restrictions)
 Forfeiture Due to Termination of Service
 Restrictions on Transfer




---



##### 



Lapse of Forfeiture Restrictions
 Vesting
 Change in Control
    Delivery of Certificates
 Custody of Restricted Stock
 Custody




---



##### 



Additional Securities as Restricted Stock
 Delivery to Participant
 Status of Stock
 Rights as Stockholder
 Compliance with Securities Laws




---



##### 



Relationship to Company
  No Guarantee of Service
 Non-Competitive Agreement
 Restricted Activity
  Termination Date




---



##### 



Remedies
 Committees Powers




---



##### 



Binding Effect
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
   HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.By:Title: Accepted:(Director)Dated:
NASA STENNIS 

AND ARTEMIS TESTING
www.nasa.gov http://www.nasa.gov/centers/stennis/

THE TRADITION

All Saturn V first and second rocket stages that carried 

astronauts to the surface of the Moon during the 

Apollo Program were tested at NASA Stennis. 

All space shuttle main engines and the space shuttle main 

propulsion test article – with its three engines – was 

tested at NASA Stennis prior to the vehicle’s maiden flight. 

THE ASSIGNMENT

l Test all RS-25 engines that will help power 

the new SLS rocket. 

l Test the SLS core stage for the Artemis I mission.

l Test the new Exploration Upper Stage for future flights.

THE STATUS

NASA performed the first RS-25 engine test

at NASA Stennis in January 2015. All RS-25 engines 

and new controllers for the first four Artemis missions have 

been tested and proven flightworthy at NASA Stennis. 

The SLS core stage was delivered to NASA Stennis 

in January 2020 and installed on the B-2 Test Stand 

to undergo a series of tests before being shipped to Kennedy 

Space Center for preparation and launch on the 

Artemis I mission. NASA Stennis also will test all 

RS-25 engines built by Aerojet Rocektdyne for use on 

future SLS missions.

THE IMPORTANCE

l Prove new engines, hardware, and operating parameters.

l Ensure astronaut safety by identifying 

and addressing potential issues prior to missions.

l Increase probability of mission success.

THE ENGINES

RS-25 engines for initial Artemis 

Program missions are space 

shuttle main engines, modified 

with a new controller and to 

provide more power. Each engine 

was placed on the Fred Haise 

Test Stand at NASA Stennis and 

fired as during an actual launch.

THE CORE STAGE

The SLS (Space Launch System) 

core stage is powered by four 

RS-25 engines, firing together to 

generate 1.6 million pounds

of combined sea-level thrust and 

more than 2 million pounds of 

altitude thrust. 

THE ‘GREEN RUN’

Prior to the Artemis I mission, NASA tested the SLS 

core stage on the B-2 Test Stand at NASA Stennis. 

For Green Run, the stage was installed on the stand 

and tested – along with all of its related components and 

systems – for the first time and in the same way it must 

operate on a mission. This included firing all four RS-25 

engines simultaneously to generate 1.6 million pounds 

of combined sea-level thrust.

THE NEW PROGRAM

NASA’s Artemis mission, 

named for the twin sister 

of Apollo, will return astronauts 

to the Moon to establish a 

strategic U.S. presence. It will 

send the first woman and the 

first person of color to the Moon.

THE NEW VEHICLE

NASA’s powerful mega rocket 

SLS (Space Launch System)

is being developed to travel 

deeper into space than ever 

and, ultimately, to Mars.

THE FUTURE

NASA Stennis will test all new 

RS-25 engines produced by 

Aerojet Rocketdyne to power 

future deep space missions, 

beginning with Artemis V.

Front image - RS-25 engine test at NASA’s Stennis Space Center on Jan. 9, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Engineering Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting #1170.
    Date/Time: October 22, 2014: 12:15 p.m. to 6 p.m. October 23, 
2014: 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: OPEN.
    Contact Person: Evette Rollins, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone 
703-292-8300.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and 
counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering 
programs and activities.
    Agenda:

Wednesday, October 22, 2014
    <bullet> The Federal Advanced Manufacturing Landscape
    <bullet> The Future of Advanced Manufacturing
    <bullet> Directorate for Engineering Update
    <bullet> OSTP Perspective on Engineering at NSF

Thursday, October 23, 2014
    <bullet> Perspectives from the Office of the Director
    <bullet> Planning for ENG AdCom Subcommittee Work
    <bullet> Overview, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, 
Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET)
    <bullet> Roundtable on ENG Strategic Activities and 
Recommendations


     Dated: October: 6, 2014.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24139 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 24.3**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned directorand/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, withfull power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the nameand on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2008, together with any and all amendmentsthereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for him and on his behalf in connectiontherewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion ofsuch attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, herebyratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney as of this 24th day of February 2009.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman F. Swanton,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/        | Norman F. Swanton             |       |
|------------|-------------------------------|------------|
|       | Norman F. Swanton             |       |
| ** ** | ***Chairman of the Board***   | ** ** |
|       | *And Chief Executive Officer* |       |
|       |                          |       |
|       | May 7, 2008              |       |

 

1

----
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

(2) NASA contracts sourced in the state in FY21; see FY21 NASA Economic Impact Report (3) Categories are not additive. For more information on FY21 Sample Obligations, please visit: NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS)

(1) For more information please visit: Value of NASA 

NASA Overall State Impact(1)

• Jobs Supported 354

• Economic Output $64,800,000

• State Tax Revenue $2,672,000

Moon to Mars Campaign State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 4

• Economic Output $586,000

• State Tax Revenue $35,000

Investments in Climate Change Research & 

Technology State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 78

• Economic Output $13,621,000

• State Tax Revenue $570,000

Sample Obligations(3)

Business $131,750 

• Other Than Small Business $0 

• Small Business $131,750 

 – 8(A) Program $0 

 – Economically Disadvantaged Women 

 Owned Small Business $0 

 – Historically Underutilized Business 

 (HUBZone) $0 

 – Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

 Business $0 

 – Small Business Innovative Research $0 

 – Small Disadvantaged Business $0 

 – Veteran Owned Small Business $0 

 – Woman Owned Small Business $0 

 – Small Business Only $131,750 

Educational $17,694,237 

Government $309,775 

Non-profit Institutions $4,964,751 

Leading State-based NASA Business 

Contractors

Space Technology and Advanced Research 

Systems, Inc. $131,750

Leading State-based NASA Education Funding 

 University of Hawaii $17,694,237

Space Grant Consortium 

 University of Hawaii, Manoa Campus, Oahu $950,000

HAWAII

FY21 State Procurement Investments (2) $26.3 M
For more information about the

Economic Impact Report

for your state, go to:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street, SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers

www.nasa.gov

James Webb Space Telescope

Cycle 1 Hours of Access

NASA Astronauts

Megan McArthur*

Ellison Onizuka

There are 3 NASA federal jobs and 222* contractors in the state 

of Hawaii. 

For every NASA federal job located in Hawaii, an additional 

117** jobs are supported in the state economy. For every 

million dollars’ worth of economic output generated by NASA 

federal jobs, an additional $47.5** million worth of output is 

sustained throughout the state economy. 

* Indirect effects are the purchases of goods and services by 

government agencies and private sector contractors, as well as by 

the industries that supply them.

** Multiplier based on IMPLAN Input Output (I-O) model. To learn more, 

please visit: https://blog.implan.com/understanding-implan-multipliers

HAWAII

354

NASA Jobs

Supported

* Current

One Hawaii supplier contributed 

to NASA’s Artemis program. 

An example of the state’s 

contributions is leading the 

Artemis CubeSat Kit Project.

Hawaii Institutions

1310

Hours
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NATHANIEL BRIDGES.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

04-3260 

NANCY L. JOHNSTON 

(substituted for William F. Johnston), 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

 Respondent. 

John H. Williamson, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a petition for rehearing 

for respondent. With him on the petition were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney 

General, David M. Cohen, Director, and William F. Ryan, Assistant Director. Of counsel 

on the petition was Jill Gerstenfeld, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Office of 

Personnel Management, of Washington, DC. 

Nancy L. Johnston (for William F. Johnston), of Seaford, Delaware, pro se. 

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

04-3260 

NANCY L. JOHNSTON 

(substituted for William F. Johnston), 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING 

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and, BRYSON, Circuit Judges. 

O R D E R

A petition for rehearing having been filed by the respondent, Office of Personnel 

Management, 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The petition for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of modifying 

the opinion issued on June 28, 2005. The precedential order modifying the opinion is 

attached. 

 (2) The mandate of the court will issue on November 25, 2005. 

FOR THE COURT 

November 17, 2005 _____________________ 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

 cc: Nancy L. Johnston 

 John H. Williamson, Esq. 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

 04-3260 

NANCY L. JOHNSTON 

(substituted for William F. Johnston), 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

 

 ON RECONSIDERATION 

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has requested amendment of the 

court's opinion, reported at Johnston v. OPM, 413 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005), to clarify 

that the duty to notify Mr. Johnston of his separation and eligibility for disability 

retirement belonged primarily to the agency that employed Mr. Johnston, rather than 

OPM. We agree that clarification is warranted. Accordingly, the opinion is modified as 

follows (with emphases added to show the changes made): 

413 F.3d at 1342, second full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: 

"OPM bears the burden of showing that the requisite notice was sent by the agency." 
04-3260 2 

413 F.3d at 1342, third full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: "The 

Board ignored the burden on OPM to show that notice was given by the agency, and . . 

. ." 

413 F.3d at 1343, first paragraph, last sentence is changed to read: "The burden 

is on OPM to establish compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements . . . ." 

413 F.3d 1343, final paragraph, second sentence is changed to read: ". . . as to 

whether or when the agency sent or Mr. Johnson received . . . ." 

No costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at March 31, 1997, and
its statement of income for the three months then ended and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd.
for the three months ended March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,511,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      26,811,017
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,042,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,048,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,999,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,048,237
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               993,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                891,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            891,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   891,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. has
an unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above
for current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

August 3, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Maryland 

Space Business Roundtable (MSBR) Lunch on August 16, 2023

On August 16, 2023, the Maryland Space Business Roundtable (MSBR), a nonprofit 

organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a lunch at the Martin’s 

Crosswinds in Greenbelt, MD, starting at 11:30 a.m. The guest speaker is Dr. Nicola Fox,

NASA.

Approximately 250 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, 

academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $40 per person. MSBR is in control of the organizing, planning and 

invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the MSBR, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or 

administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local 

ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone