alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          50,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  661,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                   352,336
<INVENTORY>                                    747,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,412,546
<PP&E>                                         815,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                 282,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,209,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,569,885
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    366,737
<COMMON>                                         8,498
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,075,482)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,209,847
<SALES>                                     11,900,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,900,667
<CGS>                                       10,961,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,087,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,603,759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               274,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,031,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,860,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,860,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,964,486)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRYANT BRITTINGHAM.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Fleming and Others *v.*Fleming.

In a suit by petition for dower, cohabitation and reputation are sufficient evidence of marriage.

*235ERROR to the *Scott*Circuit Court.

Blackford, *J.;*

Rachel *Fleming*filed a petition in 1843 against the heirs at law of her deceased husband, *James Fleming.*The object of the petition was to obtain dower in certain real estate in *Scott*county, of which the said *James*was said to have been seised during the coverture. Some of the defendants were infants, whose guardian *ad litem*answered for them in the usual form. The other defendants filed two pleas: 1. That the petitioner and said *James Fleming*were never lawfully married; 2. That the petitioner had received certain property in lieu of dower. Replications to these pleas and issues.

The evidence to prove the marriage was the recognition of the petitioner by the deceased as his wife; that the parties had lived together for fifteen or twenty years as husband and wife; and that they were reputed to be married. 'This evidence was objected to as not being legal evidence of the marriage, but the objection was overruled. The record does not show what evidence was given on the issue on the second plea.

The Court appointed commissioners to assign dower to the petitioner. The commissioners, at the next term after their appointment, made their report that they had assigned the dower. Exceptions were filed to the report; but the causes assigned do not appear on the face of the report, and they are not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions. They are not therefore before us. The report was confirmed.

The only question which the record presents to us is, whether the evidence of the marriage was legal?

It is a general rule that in civil suits, except for criminal conversation, cohabitation and reputation are sufficient evidence of marriage. It is so laid down by Ld. *Mansfield,*in *Morris*v. *Miller,*4 Burr. 2057, and in *Birt*v. *Barlow,*Dough 171. In ejectment, where the lessor’s claim was for dower, the marriage was allowed to be proved by evidence of cohabitation and declarations of the parties. *Jackson*v. *Claw,*18 Johns. 346. And where a party sought to recover in ejectment as heir at law, it was held that to show that he was born in lawful wedlock, the reputation of his parents’ having lived together as husband and wife was legal evi*236dence. *Doe d. Fleming*v. *Fleming,*4 Bingh. *266.*— Chesel*dine’s lessee*v. *Brewer,*1 Harr. *&*M Hen. 152. We think there was no error in, admitting the evidence in the present case.

*PL. P. Thornton,*for the' plaintiffs.

*J. G. Marshall,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Office of the

Administrator

Administrator

Deputy Administrator

Associate Administrator

Chief of Staff

Chief Safety &

Mission Assurance

Inspector General

NASA Advisory Groups

Chief Engineer

Aeronautics Research

Exploration Systems

Science

Space Operations

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Information Officer

General Counsel

Innovative Partnership

Program

External Relations

Chief Health & Medical Officer

Institutions & Management

Mission Directorates Mission Support Offices

Strategic Communications

Budget Management and Systems

Support

Diversity and Equal Opportunity*

Headquarters Operations

Human Capital Management

Infrastructure and Administration

Internal Controls and Management

Systems

Procurement

Security and Program Protection

Small Business Programs*

NASA Shared Services Center

Communications Planning

Education

Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs

Public Affairs

Ames Research Center

Dryden Flight Research

Center

Glenn Research Center

NASA Centers

Goddard Space Flight Center

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Johnson Space Center

Kennedy Space Center

Langley Research Center

Marshall Space Flight Center

Stennis Space Center

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Program Analysis

& Evaluation

Program and Institutional

Integration

* In accordance with law or regulation, the offices of Diversity and Equal Opportunity and Small Business Programs maintain reporting

 relationships to the Administrator and Deputy Administration.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2214 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2004 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in Missoula, 

Montana, as the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 2214 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. MIKE MANSFIELD POST OFFICE, MISSOULA, 

2 MONTANA. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in 

5 Missoula, Montana, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Post 

11 Office’’. 

Passed the Senate June 9, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF ACTING PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
  PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The
undersigned, Tracy A. Moore, the Acting Principal Accounting Officer of
TapImmune Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his or her knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
April 13, 2010
  By:         
/s/ Tracy
Moore________________________
 Tracy A. Moore
 Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer,
 Acting Principal Accounting Officer and
a director
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00177-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.F. AND J.M., CHILDREN

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. F2118586A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant sought to appeal the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights in a private termination proceeding in which the Department of Family and 

Protective Services was not involved. The trial court’s Order of Termination was signed 

on May 16, 2023. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due on 

June 5, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a)(1) (“Appeals in parental termination...cases are 

governed by the rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals....”); 26.1(b) (“in an 

accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the judgment 

or order is signed....”). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until June 14, 2023.

By letter dated July 11, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his 

appeal was untimely and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, 

within 21 days from the date of the Clerk’s letter, appellant filed a response “showing a 
In the Interest of K.F. and J.M. Page 2

reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal.” More than 21 days have 

passed, and appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s letter. 

Further, the original filing fee for this appeal has not been paid.

By letter dated July 11, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the 

filing fee was past due and that unless appellant obtained indigent status pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, the 

payment of the fee was required. In the same letter, the Clerk warned appellant that if 

the original filing fee was not paid within 21 days from the date of the letter, the appeal

would be dismissed. More than 21 days have passed, and the filing fee has not been paid.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the 

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees, § A (Amended Aug. 28, 2015, eff. Sept. 1, 2015). See also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5. Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write 

off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the 

accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith 

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 16, 2023

[CV06]
Exhibit 31.1

                          SARBANES-OXLEY CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Lesnoy, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of AICCO Premium
Finance Master Trust;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.




DATE: MARCH 31, 2006                        BY: /S/ JEFFREY LESNOY
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Jeffrey Lesnoy
                                                Title: Senior Vice President
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES CHANDLER.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.1


                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                         CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION
                  1995 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN


                  CarrAmerica Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies as follows:

                  1. The Company deems it appropriate to execute this
certificate to evidence adoption of an amendment to its 1995 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") that increased the number of options
issued annually to continuing non-employee directors under the Plan from 5,000
to 7,500 (the "Amendment").

                  2. The Board of Directors of the Company authorized and
approved the Amendment, subject to approval of the Company's stockholders, and
directed that the Amendment be submitted to the stockholders for approval.

                  3. The Amendment was submitted to the stockholders for
approval at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on May 6,
1999, and was approved by the stockholders.

                  4. Section 4.7 of the Plan therefore has been amended,
effective as of May 6, 1999, and now reads as follows:

                  "7. GRANTS OF OPTIONS.

                      On the Effective Date, each Director then serving on the
Board shall receive an Option to purchase 3,000 shares of Stock. Each Director
whose Commencement of Service is at any time thereafter shall be granted an
Option, as of the date of the Director's Commencement of Service, to purchase
3,000 shares of Stock. Thereafter, subject to the availability of shares of
Stock, immediately following each annual election of Directors, each Director
then serving as a Director on the Board, other than a Director who is first
elected to the Board at such annual election of Directors, shall be granted an
Option to purchase 7,500 shares of Stock."

                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
certificate to be signed by the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the
Company, as of May 6, 199.

                                              CarrAmerica Realty Corporation


                                              By: /s/ Linda A. Madrid
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Linda A. Madrid
                                                  Managing Director

Attest:   /s/ Ann Marie Pulsch
          ------------------------
          Ann Marie Pulsch
          Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kevin Schott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Date: December 16, 2005                      By:     /s/ KEVIN SCHOTT
      -----------------                         ---------------------------
                                                        Kevin Schott
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-73,697-10

IN RE RAUL DAV ID JACK SON, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NOS. W06-00448-K (B), W06-00445- K( B), W06-00450-K (B) & W06- 00453-K (B)

IN CRIMIN AL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

R elator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the ori gi n al jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habea s corpus in Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County and that District Clerk has not sent the trial court’s Fe bruar y 18, 2016 finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law to him. “When any pleading s, objections, motions, aff idavits, exhibi ts, proposed or enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law, or other order s are filed or made a part of the rec ord, the district cler k shall immediately

send a c opy

to all parties in the ca se.” T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 2). Respondent, the Distri ct C l er k o f Dallas County , shall respond and state whether she has sent the trial court’s2

Fe bruar y 18, 2016 finding s and conclusions to Relator. I f she has, she shall also state when she sent the finding s and conclusions to Relator. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Apr il 20, 2016 Do not publish
ADMINISTRATOR A 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR AD 

I 

ASSOCIATE 

ADM I NlSTR AT0 R 

POLICY 

D 

CHIEF 

ENGINEER FOR 

A ? 

GENERAL MANAGER AS 

1 

r I 1 

ADB P 

CHIEF 

SCIENTIST 

ASSOCIATE 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

i + 

I 2 

ASSOCIATE E 

ADMINISTRATOR 

SCIENCE AND 

APPLICATIONS 

JET PROPULSION 

LABORATORY 

GODDARD SPACE 

FLlOHT CENTER r 

I AND SPACE I TECH NOLOGY 

D RESEARCH CENTER 

I. 2 I LANOLEY H RESEARCH CENTER 

ASSOCIATE 

4 D M I N I STRATO R 

SPACE FLIGHT 

LYNDON 8. JOHNSON 

SPACE CENTER 

I 

JOHN F. KENNEDY 

SPACE CENTER 

GEORGE C. MARSHALL 

RESEARCH CENTER 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

SPACE STATION 

AD M I N ISTR AT0 R 

FOR SPACE 

TRACKING AND 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

MANAGEMENT
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of Empire Financial
Holding Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Empire Financial
Holding Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report and based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                        Date: August 18, 2006

                                        /s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
                                        Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)

PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
William D. Young, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Monogram Biosciences, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2006                    
|                                        
|/s/ WILLIAM D. YOUNG                    
|William D. Young Chief Executive
Officer