61068 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 

1The Commission defines burden as the total 

time, effort, or financial resources expended by 

persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 

provide information to or for a Federal agency. For 

further explanation of what is included in the 

information collection burden, reference 5 Code of 

Federal Regulations 1320.3. 

be damaged by mail screening 

processes.] 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Mr. Joseph 

Hagerman, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, 

Washington, DC 20024. If possible, 

please submit all items on CD, in which 

case it is not necessary to include 

printed copies. 

Docket: The docket is available for 

review at www.regulations.gov, 

including Federal Register notices, 

framework documents, summary notes, 

comments, and other supporting 

documents/materials. All documents in 

the docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Joseph Hagerman, U.S. Department of 

Energy, Office of Building Technologies 

(EE–5B), 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 

Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 

586–4549. Email: joseph.hagerman@

ee.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice announces the availability for 

public comment of the draft document 

‘‘Transaction-Based Building Controls 

Framework, Volume 1: Reference 

Guide’’. A new building diagnostic and 

controls revolution is underway within 

the buildings sector, primarily in the 

commercial buildings sector. In it, 

application-based systems are 

presenting an opportunity to implement 

strategies in which highly ‘‘optimized’’ 

control capable of constantly increasing 

efficiency levels while improving 

resource allocation is an inherent 

attribute of the strategy rather than an 

explicitly programmed feature. These 

building controls and algorithms can 

also be part of deep retrofits in existing 

buildings that result in energy savings 

not just today, but also ensure persistent 

energy savings over the life of the 

buildings. At the same time, the 

introduction of sensors and controls, as 

well as information technology and 

communication protocols between the 

buildings and the electric grid, has led 

to digitized sensing, metering, 

communication and controls. 

Using these technological advances 

and careful coordination, buildings 

could provide valuable comfort and 

productivity services to building owners 

and occupants, such as automatically 

and continuously improving building 

operations and maintenance, while at 

the same time reducing energy costs. 

The above-mentioned document 

proposes a framework concept to 

achieve the objectives of raising 

buildings’ efficiency and energy savings 

potential benefiting building owners 

and operators. We call it a transactionbased building controls’ framework, 

wherein mutually-beneficial and costeffective market-based transactions can 

be enabled between multiple players 

across different domains. 

DOE is particularly interested in 

public comment on the following list of 

questions embedded within the 

document. 

1. What do you think of the 

Transactive Energy future state 

described here? 

2. Are there other or better ways to 

make buildings smarter? 

3. How smart do buildings need to be 

and why? 

4. Are there other examples of 

Transactive Energy implementation that 

should be included? Please provide 

details, reports and studies that you 

might be aware of documenting the 

results of such implementations. 

5. Are these four categories of 

exchangeable services comprehensive 

enough? If not, should they be expanded 

in scope? Or, should additional 

categories be defined? 

6. What are some other reports/

studies that cover/support/illustrate 

these topics of services and service 

categories? 

7. Are there other important networks 

that need to be illustrated? 

8. Are there other (project) 

demonstration examples to be included? 

Are there other important categories of 

transactions? 

9. What are some additional use cases 

for this end-user service category? 

Please see the use-case template in 

section 8.0 to provide your inputs. 

10. Are there additional or better use 

cases for this energy market service 

category? Please see the use-case 

template in section 8.0 to provide your 

inputs. 

11. Can you describe additional use 

cases for this grid service category? 

Please see the use-case template in 

section 8.0 to provide your inputs. 

12. What are some additional use 

cases for this societal service category? 

Please see the use-case template in 

section 8.0 to provide your inputs. 

The public comment period ends 

November 10, 2014 to provide 

interested parties adequate time to 

prepare and submit comments and DOE 

will consider any comments received by 

that date. The report is available at 

http://www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-NOA0016. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

30, 2014. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24134 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. IC14–16–000] 

Commission Information Collection 

Activities (FERC–537, FERC–725F, 

FERC–725I); Consolidated Comment 

Request; Extension 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of information 

collections and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 USC 

3506(c)(2)(A), the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (Commission or 

FERC) is soliciting public comment on 

the requirements and burden 1 of the 

information collections described 

below. 

DATES: Comments on the collections of 

information are due December 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

(identified by Docket No. IC14–16–000) 

by either of the following methods: 

• eFiling at Commission’s Web site: 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/

efiling.asp 

• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

Secretary of the Commission, 888 First 

Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

Please reference the specific 

collection number and/or title in your 

comments. 

Instructions: All submissions must be 

formatted and filed in accordance with 

submission guidelines at: http://

www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. For user assistance contact 

FERC Online Support by email at 

ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone 

at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202) 

502–8659 for TTY. 

Docket: Users interested in receiving 

automatic notification of activity in this 

docket or in viewing/downloading 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 61069 

2 15 U.S.C. 3301–3432. 

3 15 U.S.C. 717–717w. 

4 18 CFR 284.8. 

5The estimates for cost per response are derived 

using the following formula: Average Burden Hours 

per Response * $70.50 per Hour = Average Cost per 

Response. The cost per hour figure is the FERC 

average salary. Subject matter experts found that 

industry employment costs closely resemble FERC’s 

regarding the FERC–537 information collection. 

comments and issuances in this docket 

may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/docs-filing.asp. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ellen Brown may be reached by email 

at DataClearance@FERC.gov, telephone 

at (202) 502–8663, and fax at (202) 273– 

0873. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Type of Request: Three-year extension 

of the information collection 

requirements for all collections 

described below with no changes to the 

current reporting requirements. Please 

note that each collection is distinct from 

the next. 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(1) Whether the collections of 

information are necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimates of the burden and cost of the 

collections of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility and clarity of the 

information collections; and (4) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collections 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

FERC–537, Gas Pipeline Certificates: 

Construction, Acquisition and 

Abandonment 

OMB Control No.: 1902–0060. 

Abstract: The information collected 

under the requirements of FERC–537 is 

used by the Commission to implement 

the statutory provisions of the Natural 

Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) 2 and the 

Natural Gas Act (NGA). 3 Under Section 

7(c) of the NGA, natural gas pipeline 

companies must obtain Commission 

authorization to undertake the 

construction or extension of any 

facilities, or to acquire or operate any 

such facilities or extensions. A natural 

gas company must also obtain 

Commission approval under Section 

7(b) of the NGA prior to abandoning any 

jurisdictional facility or service. Under 

the NGA and the NGPA, interstate and 

intrastate pipelines must also obtain 

authorization for certain transportation 

and storage services and arrangements, 

particularly a Part 284, Subpart G— 

Blanket Certificate.4

The information collected is 

necessary to certificate interstate 

pipelines engaged in the transportation 

and sale of natural gas, and the 

construction, acquisition, and operation 

of facilities to be used in those 

activities, to authorize the abandonment 

of facilities and services, and to 

authorize certain NGPA transactions. If 

a certificate is granted, the natural gas 

company can construct, acquire, or 

operate facilities, plus engage in 

interstate transportation or sale of 

natural gas. Conversely, approval of an 

abandonment application permits the 

pipeline to cease service and/or 

discontinue the operation of such 

facilities. Authorization under NGPA 

Section 311(a) allows the interstate or 

intrastate pipeline applicants to render 

certain transportation services. 

The data required to be submitted 

consists of identification of the 

company and responsible officials, 

factors considered in the location of the 

facilities and the detailed impact on the 

project area for environmental 

considerations. Also to be submitted are 

the following: 

• Flow diagrams showing proposed 

design capacity for engineering design 

verification and safety determination; 

• Commercial and economic data 

presenting the basis for the proposed 

action; and 

• Cost of the proposed facilities, 

plans for financing, and estimated 

revenues and expenses related to the 

proposed facility for accounting and 

financial evaluation. 

The Commission implements these 

filing requirements in the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR 

Parts 157.5–.11; 157.13–.20; 157.53; 

157.201–.209; 157.211; 157.214–.218; 

284.8; 284.11; 284.126; 284.221; 

284.224. 

Type of Respondent: Natural Gas 

Pipelines. 

Estimate of Annual Burden: The 

Commission estimates the annual public 

reporting burden for the information 

collection as: 

FERC–537—GAS PIPELINE CERTIFICATES: CONSTRUCTION, ACQUISITION, AND ABANDONMENT

Number of 

respondents 

Annual number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number of 

responses 

Average burden hours 

& cost per response 5

Total annual burden 

hours & total annual 

cost 

Cost per respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1)*(2) = (3) (4) (3)*(4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

389 1.2 467 133 

$9,377 

62,111 

$4,379,059 

$11,257 

A more granular breakdown of the 

average burden hour figure (i.e. 133 

hours per response) follows: 

Regulation section 18 CFR . . . Regulation topic Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses 

Avg. hours per 

response 

157.5–.11; & 157.13–.20 ................. Interstate certificate and abandonment applications .... 149 82 500 

157.53 .............................................. Exemptions .................................................................... 149 0.5 100 

157.201–.209; 157.211; 157.214– 

.218.

Blanket Certificates prior notice filings .......................... 149 46 200 

157.201–.209; 157.211; 157.214– 

.218.

Blanket Certificates—annual reports ............................. 198 294 50 

284.11 .............................................. NGPA Sec. 311 Construction—annual reports ............. 198 294 50 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

61070 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 

6The number for these filings is accounted for in 

other regulatory categories in FERC–537. 7Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58, 

Title XII, Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16 

U.S.C. 824o. 8 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3). 

9Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric 

Reliability Organization; and Procedures for the 

Establishment, Approval, and Enforcement of 

Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC 

Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,204, order on reh’g, Order No. 

672–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,212 (2006). 

10 Mandatory Reliability Standard for Nuclear 

Plant Interface Coordination, Order No. 716, 125 

FERC ¶ 61,065, at P 189 & n.90 (2008), order on 

reh’g, Order No. 716–A, 126 FERC ¶ 61,122 (2009). 

11North American Electric Reliability 

Corporation, 130 FERC ¶ 61,051 (2010). When the 

revised Reliability Standard was approved the 

Commission did not go to OMB for approval. It is 

assumed that the changes made did not 

substantively affect the information collection and 

therefore a formal submission to OMB was not 

needed. 

12See Reliability Standard NUC–001–2 at http:// 

www.nerc.com/files/NUC-001-2.pdf. 

13The list of functional entities consists of 

transmission operators, transmission owners, 

transmission planners, transmission service 

providers, balancing authorities, reliability 

coordinators, planning authorities, distribution 

providers, load-serving entities, generator owners 

and generator operators. 

14The cost for reporting requirements is $73.83/ 

hour and is based on a composite loaded (wage plus 

benefits) average wage for an electrical engineer, 

attorney, and administrative staff. The cost for 

record keeping is $29.01 and is based on the loaded 

wage for a file clerk. The wages are generated from 

Burueau of Labor Statistics data retrieved 

September, 2014 from http://www.bls.gov/oes/ 

current/naics2_22.htm. The loaded wage is 

calculated using BLS data indicating, as of Sept 1, 

2014, that wages make up 69.9% of total salary 

(http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm). 

15This figure of 130 transmission entities is based 

on the assumption that each agreement will be 

between 1 nuclear plant and 2 transmission entities 

(65 times 2 = 130). However, there is some double 

counting in this figure because some transmission 

entities may be party to multiple agreements with 

multiple nuclear plants. The double counting does 

not affect the burden estimate and the correct 

number of unique respondents will be reported to 

OMB. The actual number of unique entities subject 

to this collection is 143. 

Regulation section 18 CFR . . . Regulation topic Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses 

Avg. hours per 

response 

284.8 ................................................ Capacity Release—record keeping ............................... 0 N/A 75 

284.126(a)&(c) ................................. Intrastate bypass, semi-annual transportation & storage—reports.37 48 30 

284.221 ............................................ Blanket Certificates—one time filing, inc. new tariff and 

rate design proposal.

6 0 N/A 100 

284.224 ............................................ Hinshaw Blanket Certificates ........................................ 5 5 75 

157.5–.11; & 157.13–.20 ................. Non-facility certificate or abandonment applications .... 0 N/A 75 

TOTALS .................................... ........................................................................................ 1 389 distinct 

entities. 

467 2 133 average, 

weighted. 

1 Distinct entities. 

2Average weighted. 

FERC–725F, Mandatory Reliability 

Standards for Nuclear Plant Interface 

Coordination 

OMB Control No.: 1902–0249. 

Abstract: The Commission requires 

the information collected by the FERC– 

725F to implement the statutory 

provisions of section 215 of the Federal 

Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824o). On 

August 8, 2005, the Electricity 

Modernization Act of 2005, which is 

Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Energy 

Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), was 

enacted into law.7 EPAct 2005 added a 

new section 215 to the FPA, which 

required a Commission-certified Electric 

Reliability Organization (ERO) to 

develop mandatory and enforceable 

Reliability Standards, which are subject 

to Commission review and approval. 

Once approved, the Reliability 

Standards may be enforced by the ERO 

subject to Commission oversight, or the 

Commission can independently enforce 

Reliability Standards.8

On February 3, 2006, the Commission 

issued Order No. 672, implementing 

section 215 of the FPA.9 Pursuant to 

Order No. 672, the Commission certified 

one organization, North American 

Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), 

as the ERO. The Reliability Standards 

developed by the ERO and approved by 

the Commission apply to users, owners 

and operators of the Bulk-Power System 

as set forth in each Reliability Standard. 

On November 19, 2007, NERC filed its 

petition for Commission approval of the 

Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination 

Reliability Standard, designated NUC– 

001–1. In Order No. 716, issued October 

16, 2008, the Commission approved the 

standard while also directing certain 

revisions.10 Revised Reliability 

Standard, NUC–001–2, was filed with 

the Commission by NERC in August 

2009 and subsequently approved by the 

Commission January 21, 2010.11

The purpose of Reliability Standard 

NUC–001–2 is to require ‘‘coordination 

between nuclear plant generator 

operators and transmission entities for 

the purpose of ensuring nuclear plant 

safe operation and shutdown.’’ 12 The 

Nuclear Reliability Standard applies to 

nuclear plant generator operators 

(generally nuclear power plant owners 

and operators, including licensees) and 

‘‘transmission entities,’’ defined in the 

Reliability Standard as including a 

nuclear plant’s suppliers of off-site 

power and related transmission and 

distribution services. To account for the 

variations in nuclear plant design and 

grid interconnection characteristics, the 

Reliability Standard defines 

transmission entities as ‘‘all entities that 

are responsible for providing services 

related to Nuclear Plant Interface 

Requirements (NPIRs),’’ and lists eleven 

types of functional entities (heretofore 

described as ‘‘transmission entities’’) 

that could provide services related to 

NPIRs.13

FERC–725F information collection 

requirements include establishing and 

maintaining interface agreements, 

including record retention 

requirements. These agreements are not 

filed with FERC but with the 

appropriate entities as established by 

the Reliability Standard. 

Type of Respondent: Nuclear 

operators, nuclear plants, transmission 

entities. 

Estimate of Annual Burden: The 

Commission estimates the average 

annual burden for this information 

collection as: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 61071 

16The recordkeeping ‘‘responses’’ are considered 

to be part of (i.e. to be contained within the same 

quantity as) the Reporting responses leading to a 

total number of unique responses of 420 (390 + 30 

= 420). 

17The burden estimates for Reliability Standard 

PRC–006–1 are included in Order No. 763 (Final 

Rule in RM11–20) and covered in FERC–725A 

(OMB Control No. 1902–0244). OMB approved 

those requirements on 7/9/2012 (ICR Reference No. 

201204–1902–001). 

18 Disturbance Monitoring Equipment Criteria 

(Aug. 2007), available at https://www.npcc.org/ 

Standards/Criteria/A-15.pdf (Disturbance 

Monitoring Criteria). 

19 Guide for Application of Disturbance 

Recording Equipment (Sept. 2006), available at 

https://www.npcc.org/Standards/Guides/B-26.pdf 

(Application Guide). 

20 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2) (2011). 

21The burden estimates for Reliability Standard 

PRC–006–1 are included in Order No. 763 (Final 

Rule in RM11–20) and currently covered in FERC– 

725A (OMB Control No. 1902–0244). OMB 

approved those requirements on 7/9/2012 (ICR 

Reference No. 201204–1902–001). 

FERC–725F Number of respondents 

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden 

hours & cost 

per 

response 14

Total annual 

burden hours 

& total annual 

cost 

Cost per 

respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1)*(2) = (3) (4) (3)*(4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

New agreements (Reporting).10 nuclear operators + 20 

transmission entities.

1 30 1,080 

$79,736 

32,400 

$2,392,092 

$79,736 

New Agreements (Record 

Keeping).

10 nuclear operators + 20 

transmission entities.

1 30 108 

$3,133 

3,240 

$93,992 

3,133 

Modifications to agreements 

(Reporting).

65 nuclear plants + 130 

transmission entities 15.

2 390 66.67 

$4,922 

26,000 

$1,919,581 

9,844 

Modifications to Agreements 

(Record Keeping).

65 nuclear plants + 130 

transmission entities.

2 390 6.67 

$193 

2,600 

$75,426 

387 

Total ............................. ............................................. 16 420 ........................ 64,240 

$4,481,091 

........................ ........................

FERC–725I, Mandatory Reliability 

Standards for the Northeast Power 

Coordinating Council 

OMB Control No.: 1902–0258. 

Abstract: This information collection 

relates to two FERC approved Protection 

and Control (PRC) regional Reliability 

Standards: PRC–002–NPCC–01— 

Disturbance Monitoring, and PRC–006– 

NPCC–1—Automatic Underfrequency 

Load-Shedding. These Northeast Power 

Coordinating Council (NPCC) regional 

Reliability Standards require 

respondents to provide recording 

capability necessary to monitor the 

response of the Bulk-Power System to 

system disturbances, including 

scheduled and unscheduled outages; 

requires each reliability coordinator to 

establish requirements for its area’s 

dynamic disturbance recording needs; 

establishes disturbance data reporting 

requirements; and requires planning 

coordinators to incrementally gather 

data, run studies, and analyze study 

results to design or update the UFLS 

programs that are required in the 

regional Reliability Standard in addition 

to the requirements of the NERC 

Reliability Standard PRC–006–1.17

Reliability Standard PRC–002–NPCC– 

01 introduced several new mandatory 

and enforceable requirements for the 

applicable entities. However, when 

FERC approved this standard NPCC had 

(and continues to have) criteria 18 and 

published guidance 19 addressing 

similar requirements that the Reliability 

Standard made mandatory. Thus, it is 

usual and customary for affected entities 

within NPCC to create, maintain and 

store some of the same or equivalent 

information identified in Reliability 

Standard PRC–002–NPCC–01. 

Therefore, many of the requirements 

contained in PRC–002–NPCC–01 do not 

impose new burdens on the affected 

entities.20

Several requirements contained in 

regional Reliability Standard PRC–002– 

NPCC–01 were entirely new 

responsibilities for the applicable 

entities when the Commission approved 

the standard and each of these is listed 

in the estimated annual burden section 

below. 

Information collection burden for 

Reliability Standard PRC–006–NPCC–01 

is based on the time needed for 

planning coordinators and generator 

owners to incrementally gather data, run 

studies, and analyze study results to 

design or update the UFLS programs 

that are required in the regional 

Reliability Standard in addition to the 

requirements of the NERC Reliability 

Standard PRC–006–1.21 There is also 

burden on the generator owners to 

maintain data. 

Type of Respondent: Entities 

registered with the North American 

Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) 

as Generator Owners, Transmission 

Owners, Reliability Coordinators and 

Planning Coordinators 

Estimate of Annual Burden: The 

number of respondents is based on 

NERC’s registry as of August 27, 2014. 

Entities registered for more than one 

applicable function type have been 

accounted for in the figures below. The 

Commission estimates the annual public 

reporting burden for the information 

collection as: 

Information collection requirements Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden hours 

& cost per 

response 22

Total annual 

burden hours 

& total annual 

cost 

Cost per 

Respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1)*(2) = (3) (4) (3)*(4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

R13: GO 23 and TO to have evidence it 

acquired and installed dynamic disturbance recorders and a mutually agreed 

upon implementation schedule with the 

RC (record retention) ........................... 1 1 1 10 

$290 

10 

$290 

$290 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

61072 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 

22The estimates for cost per response are derived 

using the following formula: Average Burden Hours 

per Response * XX per Hour = Average Cost per 

Response. The hourly cost figure comes from the 

Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/oes/ 

current/naics2_22.htm and http://www.bls.gov/

news.release/ecec.nr0.htm). Record retention at a 

wage plus benefits cost of $29/hour and the 

remaining costs are based on the wage plus benefits 

for an electrical engineer at $61/hour. 

23For purposes of these charts, generation owner 

is abbreviated to GO, transmission owner is 

abbreviated to TO, reliability coordinator is 

abbreviated to RC, and planning coordinator is 

abbreviated to PC. 

24We estimate that an entity will experience a 

unit failure greater than 90 days once every five 

years. Therefore, 20 percent of NPCC’s 166 

generator owners and transmission owners will 

experience a unit failure of this duration each year. 

25The recordkeeping ‘‘responses’’ for R14.7 and 

R17 are considered to be part of (i.e. to be contained 

within the same quantity as) the Reporting 

responses leading to a total number of unique 

responses of 420 (390 + 30 = 420). 

Information collection requirements Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden hours 

& cost per 

response 22

Total annual 

burden hours 

& total annual 

cost 

Cost per 

Respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1)*(2) = (3) (4) (3)*(4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

R14.5: GO and TO to have evidence of 

a maintenance and testing program for 

stand-alone disturbance monitoring 

equipment including monthly 

verification of active analog quantities 166 12 1,992 5 

$305 

9,960 

$607,560 

3,660 

R14.7: GO and TO to record efforts to 

return failed units to service if it takes 

longer than 90 days 24 .......................... 33 1 33 10 

$610 

330 

$20,130 

610 

R14.7: GO and TO record retention ........ 33 1 33 10 

$290 

330 

$9,570 

290 

R17: RC provide certain disturbance 

monitoring equipment data to the Regional Entity upon request ................... 5 1 5 5 

$305 

25 

$1,525 

305 

R17: RC record retention ......................... 5 1 5 10 

$290 

50 

$1,450 

290 

Total .................................................. ........................ 25 2,031 ........................ 10,705 

$640,525 

........................ ........................

RELIABILITY STANDARD PRC–006–NPCC–01 

Information collection requirements Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden hours 

& cost per 

response 

Total annual 

burden hours 

& total annual 

cost 

Cost per 

respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1)*(2) = (3) (4) (3)*(4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

PCs Design and document automatic 

UFLS program ...................................... 6 1 6 8 

$488 

48 

$2,928 

$488 

PCs update and maintain UFLS program 

database ............................................... 6 1 6 16 

$976 

96 

$5,856 

976 

GOs provide documentation and data to 

the planning coordinator ....................... 145 1 145 16 

$976 

2,320 

$141,520 

976 

GOs: record retention .............................. 145 1 145 4 

$116 

580 

$16,820 

116 

Total .................................................. ........................ ........................ 302 ........................ 3,044 

$167,124 

........................

Dated: September 30, 2014. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24057 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES