alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of those controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated May 2, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on May 15, 2014, 79 FR 27936, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Attn: RA, 100 GBC Drive, Mailstop 514, Newark, Delaware 19702, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., to manufacture the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Controlled substance
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IEcgonine (9180)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to produce the listed controlled substances in bulk to be used in the manufacture of reagents and drug calibrator controls which are DEA exempt products. In reference to drug code 7370 the company plans to bulk manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. Dated: October 1, 2014. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2014-24035 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Human Exploration 

and Operations 

Mission Directorate

Chief, Safety and Mission 

Assurance

Kennedy Space 

Center

Marshall Space 

Flight Center

Langley Research 

Center

Stennis Space 

Center

Johnson Space 

Center

Armstrong Flight 

Research Center

Goddard Space 

Flight Center

Glenn Research 

Center

Jet Propulsion 

Laboratory*** 

Ames Research 

Mission Support Center

Directorate

Administrator

Deputy Administrator

Associate Administrator

Chief of Staff

Deputy Associate Administrator

Associate Deputy Administrator 

Associate Administrator for Strategy

 and Plans

Chief Engineer

Chief Health and Medical 

Officer

Chief Financial Officer*

Chief Information Officer*

Diversity and Equal 

Opportunity

Legislative and 

Intergovernmental Affairs*

International and 

Interagency Relations

STEM Engagement Communications*

Small Business 

Programs

Advisory Groups

NAC and ASAP

Inspector General

Human Capital Management

Strategic Infrastructure

Headquarters Operations

NASA Shared Services Center

Procurement

Protective Services

Aeronautics 

Research Mission 

Directorate

Space Technology 

Mission Directorate

Office of Strategy and 

Plans

Office of Agency Council 

Staff

NASA Management 

Office** 

Science Mission 

Directorate

Office of Strategy and 

Plans

Office of Agency Council 

Staff

General Counsel

Chief Scientist

Chief Technologist

Reporting Structure

Administrator

Associate Administrator

Note: Administrator may delegate direct reports to Deputy Administrator at his/her discretion.

 * Center functional office directors report to Agency functional AA or Chief. Deputy and below report to Center leadership. 

** NMO oversees the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and other Federally Funded Research and Development Center work.

www.nasa.gov *** Functional reporting only.

August 2018
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


FRESH CHOICE, INC.
COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND EQUIVALENT SHARE
(In thousands, except per share amounts)






<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Twelve Weeks Ended
                                                ----------------------
                                                March 23,    March 24,
                                                    1997         1996
                                                --------     -------- 
<S>                                              <C>          <C>     
               Net loss                          $  (649)     $  (866)
                                                 =======      =======

                           Weighted average
                  common shares outstanding        5,661        5,584

                Common share equivalents(1)            -            -
                                                 -------      -------

                 Shares used in computation        5,661        5,584
                                                 =======      =======

                               Net loss per
                common and equivalent share      $ (0.11)     $ (0.16)
                                                 =======      =======
</TABLE>





(1) Common share equivalents relating to stock options, warrants and convertible
preferred shares have been excluded from the computations for 1997 and 1996 as
they would be anti-dilutive.
#### VERA POLLACK v. RICHARD ROBERTS.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew Medeiros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SonicWALL, Inc.



Date: March 15, 2004

By:

/s/    MATTHEW MEDEIROSName:

Matthew MedeirosTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Kathleen M.
Fisher, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SonicWALL,
Inc.



Date: March 15, 2004

By:

/s/    KATHLEEN M. FISHERName:

Kathleen M. FisherTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,639-01

EX PARTE PARIS RICHARDSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 17FC2390-G(1) IN THE 319 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The

Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Richardson v. State, 13-18-00297-CR (Tex.

App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg Aug. 15, 2019)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contendsthat appellate counselfailed to timelyinformApplicant that his conviction

had been affirmed. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that appellate counsel’s

performance was deficient and that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary

review but for counsel’s deficient performance. 
2

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary

review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in cause number 13-18-00297-CR. 

Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this Court

within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF D.G.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 133

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200020

Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, 

the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mary E. Depuydt, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Wishek, ND, for plaintiff 

and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.
1

State v. Bethancorth

No. 20200020

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth appeals from a criminal judgment

entered after a jury found him guilty of criminal trespass. He argues his degree 

of intoxication prevented him from knowing that he was not licensed or 

privileged to enter or remain in a dwelling or highly secured premises, and the 

district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal. We summarily affirm 

under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers 

Jerod E. Tufte 

Lisa Fair McEvers

Gerald W. VandeWalle
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, John R. Detwiler, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Credence Systems
Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this quarterly report; and



3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report.



Date:
March 17, 2003

|                    
|--------------------
|/S/ JOHN R. DETWILER
|John R. Detwiler    

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Atkinson and Another *v.*Starbuck.

*Tuesday, June*10.

Debt on a delivery-bond, the condition reciting the *fi. fa.*but not the judgment. Pleas, 1. No consideration. 2. The bond was obtained by fraud, covin, and misrepresentation. ' 3. Payment of the judgment before the execution issued. *Held,*on general demurrer, that the picas were good.

ERROR to the *Washington*Circuit Court.

Blackford, *J.*

— Starbuck brought an action of debt against *Atkinson*and another, before a justice of the peace, on a delivery-bond. The bond, which was filed before the justice as a cause of action, is in substance as follows: Know all men, &c. The condition of the above obligation is such, that whereas a writ of *ji.fa.*issued, &c., against the above-bound *John Atkinson*at the suit of *Benjamin Starbuck*for the sum of, &c., which has been levied, &c., on one bay mare, &c.; if, therefore, the said *Atkinson*shall deliver to the sheriff, on, &c., the said mare, to be then and there sold according to law, then the above obligation to be void. Pleas as follows: 1. No consideration. 2. The bond was obtained by fraud, covin, and misrepresentation. 3. Payment of the judgment before the execution issued. 4. Similar to the second. 5. Similar to the third. Replications in denial of the pleas. The cause was tried by the justice, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The defendants appealed.

In the Circuit Court, the plaintiff withdrew the replications, and demurred generally to the pleas. The demurrers were sustained; the damages assessed; and judgment rendered for the plaintiff.

*421*A. C. Griffith,*for the plaintiffs.

*H. P. Thornton,*for the defendant.

We think the pleas are good on general demurrer. As the execution is recited in the bond sued on, the were estopped from denying the existence of the execution. But the judgment is not so recited, and the defendants therefore might show there was no judgment, or that it had been paid. If, for example, the execution issued without any judgment, the goods were not subject to the levy, and the plea of no consideration was applicable to the case. It would be the same, if the judgment was paid before the execution issued; and the third and fifth pleas, therefore, are substantially good as amounting to pleas of no consideration. To the pleas of fraud, there can be no objection.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jared Bozydaj, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 447]

Spain, J. Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered April 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted murder in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree (five counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and unlawful wearing of a body vest, and (2) from a judgment of said court, rendered April 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal mischief in the second degree.

Defendant was charged in two separate indictments for a myriad of crimes stemming from a shooting spree which occurred in the Village of New Paltz, Ulster County. Defendant, wearing a bulletproof vest, intermittently fired more than 60 rounds from a semiautomatic assault rifle at police officers, police vehicles and various bystanders and buildings in the area *792over a 40 minute period. One bullet struck an Ulster County Deputy Sheriff in the arm and finger. In full satisfaction of both indictments, defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of attempted murder in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree (five counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, unlawful wearing of a body vest and criminal mischief in the second degree. Defendant entered into the plea with the express understanding that he would be sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 20 years to life on the two attempted murder convictions and equal or lesser concurrent prison terms on the remaining convictions. Having been sentenced as agreed, defendant now appeals, contending that his sentence is harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the numerous arguments advanced by defendant in support of his contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive and we decline to disturb it. Defendant, age 25 at the time of these crimes, attributes this incident to untreated mental illness and substance abuse, and characterizes it as a suicide attempt. He argues that these factors and his lack of a prior criminal history warrant a reduction in the sentence. In light of the traumatic, senseless and prolonged nature of these deliberate and extremely reckless crimes—which exposed many civilians and law enforcement officers to grave danger—and considering that the sentence was agreed upon and far less than the maximum permissible sentence, we find neither an abuse of discretion nor the existence of extraordinary circumstances which would warrant a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Trimm,*295 AD2d 640, 642 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 732 [2002]; *People v Centorani,*294 AD2d 613, 614 [2002]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Matthew Medeiros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SonicWALL, Inc. Date: March 21, 2005
    By:

/s/
MATTHEW MEDEIROSName:
    Matthew MedeirosTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer I, Robert Selvi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SonicWALL, Inc. Date: March 21, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert SelviName:
    Robert SelviTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aviation Upgrade Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Torbjorn B. Lundqvist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                         /s/ Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         November 7, 2005




                                       32
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

WE CONSENT TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
(FORM S-8 NO. 333-96235) PERTAINING TO THE 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN AND THE
1999 STOCK OPTION AND GRANT PLAN OF MCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT (FORM S-8 NO. 333-49946) PERTAINING TO THE THE 2000
DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN OF MCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND THE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT (FORM S-8 NO. 333-51218) PERTAINING TO THE 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK
PURCHASE PLAN OF MCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OF OUR REPORT DATED JUNE 1, 2001
WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MCK COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT (FORM 10-K) FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30,
2001.

                                                /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
JUNE 29, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc.
and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 4, 2006
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 27, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

PAUTAN SIMANJUNTAK,

Petitioner, 

v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States

Attorney General,

Respondent. 

No. 10-9512 

 (Petition for Review)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on “Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Voluntary 

Dismissal.” The motion is granted pursuant to 10th Circuit Rule 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-9512 Document: 01018410355 Date Filed: 04/27/2010 Page: 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2021

NO. 03-19-00437-CR

Jerson Ramiro Sanchez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.