alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.                         January 24, 2007
---------------------------                         ----------------
Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.                                   Date
Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

               In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of WNC
          California  Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the
          period  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
          Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to
          18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial Officer
          of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general partner of the general partner of
          the  Partnership,  hereby  certify  that  hereby  certify  that  to my
          knowledge:


1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

January 25, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892997
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,423,217
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,426,217
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,057,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,717,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,057,215
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    35,549
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      200,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   819,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (984,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (984,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (984,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Danny Terry, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[786 NYS2d 747]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits unauthorized use of a controlled substance. The Attorney General advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of McGee v Goord,*3 AD3d 634 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2231 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2231

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
         program through June 30, 2004, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Welfare Reform Extension Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK 
              GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2004.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 of such 
Act, shall continue through June 30, 2004, in the manner authorized for 
fiscal year 2002, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, 
and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant to 
this authority through the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 at the 
level provided for such activities through the third quarter of fiscal 
year 2002.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``March 31'' and inserting ``June 30''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE 
              AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH JUNE 30, 2004.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through June 30, 2004, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2002, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the third 
quarter of fiscal year 2004 at the level provided for such activities 
through the third quarter of fiscal year 2002.

            Passed the Senate March 25, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2231

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
         program through June 30, 2004, and for other purposes.
```
#### The Commonwealth *v.*Blair.

Trustee of Jury Fund, Renewal of Bond — Sureties.

. The trustee of the jury fund of Daviess county, without an order from court, filed a second bond, which was approved as the first one had been, and contained the name of only one of the original sureties. *Held,*that the second bond was not a cumulative one, but a renewal in entirety.

APPEAL PROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 7, 1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Marshall :

At the August term, 1861, of the Circuit Court for the county of Daviess, Geo. M. Taylor was appointed trustee of the jury fund in that county, and executed bond or covenant for the discharge of his duties as such, with four sureties. The statute requires a renewal of the bond every second year, but the court having the general supervision of the fund and of the officer, and being expressly invested with the power of removing the officer might undoubtedly require or receive a new bond whenever one should be deemed necessary by the judge, or should be offered by the officer.

*239At the February term, 1862, of the Circuit Court for Daviess county, Taylor, the trustee, without any order therefor, executed and filed a new bond with seven sureties, which was approved as the first one had been by the attorney for the Commonwealth and the judge of the court, and was ordered to be copied and certified to the auditor.

Npon comparison of the two bonds it appears that but one of the sureties who had executed the first was a party to the second, and that J". H. Blain, the appellee in this case, did not execute the second bond. At the June term, 1863, of the Franklin Circuit Court a judgment was rendered in favor of the Commonwealth and against the parties to the first bond alone for a large sum of money, being the balance in Taylor’s hands as trustee at a period long subsequent to the execution of the second bond, together with interest and damages thereon and the costs.

In January, 1865, the Legislature passed an act which authorized Blair to file a petition stating the facts and reasons for his being exempt from liability for said judgment, and authorizing an injunction, etc. The petition was accordingly filed, and the leports and settlements of Taylor were filed, and the court being of opinion that the second bond was not cumulative but a renewal, which discharged the obligors in the first bond from future liability, and that they were not liable for the balance found due from Taylor on the subsequent settlement on which the judgment was rendered, perpetuated the injunction.

Whether the second bond should be regarded as cumulative, or as a renewal and substitution for the first, is the only question which has been seriously argued.

As the second bond was voluntarily tendered by Taylor, signed by one, and one only, of the original sureties, we can conceive no other probable motive for its execution but that of exonerating such of the original sureties as did not wish to be further bound for Taylor, and as this must have been understood by the court the bond should be construed as having that effect.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Indian Health Service

# AGENCY:

Indian Health Service, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

The Indian Health Service is issuing this Notice to correct the effective date from October 29, 2014 to September 22, 2014 for the final Policy for Conferring with Urban Indian Organizations. The notice published at 79 FR 58359, September 29, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Office of Management Services, Management Policy and Internal Control Staff, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 625A, Rockville, MD 20852, Telephone (301) 443-2650. (This is not a toll-free number.)

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 29, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-23005, on page 58359, in the third column, following                         **DATES**                         the correct date should read as follows:                    

This Policy is effective September 22, 2014.

Dated: October 3, 2014.

Yvette Roubideaux,

Acting Director, Indian Health Service.

[FR Doc. 2014-24154 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-16-P
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|Dated:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ John E. YetterJohn E. YetterVice President and Chief Financial
     Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[785 NYS2d 911]

#### In the Matter of Kirill Percy, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

December 16, 2004

By the Publisher’s Editorial Staff

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City *(Raymond Vallejo*of counsel), for petitioner.

*27
      *Rochman Plazter Fallick Sternheim Luca & Pearl, LLP. (Barry M. Fallick*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Kirill Percy was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 3, 1996. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On November 18, 2003, respondent was convicted, upon his guilty plea, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 USC § 371, for his participation in a conspiracy to commit health care fraud and to falsify, conceal and cover up material facts and make and use false writings and documents in a matter involving a health care benefit program. This offense is a felony under the United States Code.

By order entered July 29, 2004, this Court found that the crime of which respondent had been convicted was a serious crime, suspended him pending further order of the Court and referred the matter for a hearing before a referee *(Matter of Percy,*10 AD3d 66 [2004]).

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11, accepting respondent’s affidavit of resignation from the practice of law and striking his name from the role of attorneys, based on his inability to successfully defend himself on the merits against the charges that are the subject of the disciplinary investigation *(see Matter of Perrone,*2 AD3d 35 [2003] [resignation accepted of attorney who pleaded guilty to a federal felony]).

Respondent has submitted an affidavit in compliance with the criteria of 22 NYCRR 603.11. In his affidavit, respondent acknowledges that there is a disciplinary proceeding against him based on his conviction, that he could not successfully defend himself against the charges, and that his resignation is voluntary, free from coercion or duress, and submitted with full knowledge of its implications.

In light of respondent’s submission of an affidavit in full compliance with 22 NYCRR 603.11 (a), the Committee’s motion for an order accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law should be granted.

*28Accordingly, the Committee’s motion for an order accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law and striking his name from the roll of attorneys should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sulllivan and Marlow, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OncoVista Innovative
      Therapies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J.
      Michael Edwards ,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
      presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.





Dated:
      April 14, 2008


By:
                /s/
                  J. Michael EdwardsJ.
                  Michael EdwardsChief
                  Financial
                  Officer


This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and will be retained by
      OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Bembury, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 661]

*576Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered May 8, 2001, convicting him of assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the interference of the trial court during his cross-examination is unpreserved for appellate review (see *People v Charleston,*56 NY2d 886 [1982]). In any event, while the court, at times, took an overly-active role in questioning the defendant, its conduct did not rise “to such an extent as to deny the defendant a fair and impartial trial” *(People v Jordan,*138 AD2d 407 [1988]; *see People v Sevencan,*258 AD2d 485 [1999]; *People v Watts,*159 AD2d 740 [1990]). Furthermore, any potential prejudice to the defendant was minimized by the trial court’s instructions to the jury advising it that the court had no opinion concerning the case *(see People v Man Xing Guo,*271 AD2d 700 [2000]; *People v Cuba,*154 AD2d 703 [1989]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,302,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,324,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                   126,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,635,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,116,436
<PP&E>                                       4,089,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,237,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,707,347
<BONDS>                                      3,820,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,113,523
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,237,720
<SALES>                                     10,186,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,186,128
<CGS>                                        5,959,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,959,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,726,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,646,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,646,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,646,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>