alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Koji Sato, certify
that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as previously amended
by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A and as further amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Koji SatoKoji SatoChief Executive Officer,
Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation




---

CERTIFICATIONS I, Yoichi Miyazaki, certify that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as previously amended
by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A and as further amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company);  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. Date: February 6, 2024  /s/ Yoichi MiyazakiYoichi MiyazakiChief Financial Officer,
Member of the Board of Directors
Toyota Motor Corporation
- Home
- Airspace Operations and Safety…
- Air Traffic Management –…

- Airspace Operations and Safety…
- Projects   - Advanced Capabilities for Emergency Response (ACERO)
  - Air Mobility Pathfinders (AMP)
  - Air Traffic Management—Exploration (ATM-X)
  - System-Wide Safety (SWS)
- About   - Leadership and Team
  - Contact NASA

# Air Traffic Management – eXploration Project

The Air Traffic Management – eXploration (ATM-X) project will transform the air traffic management system to safely accommodate the growing demand of new air vehicles to enter the airspace to perform a variety of missions.

                                Learn More About the ATM-X Project about Air Traffic Management – eXploration Project

## PROJECT MANAGER (PM)

**Shivanjli Sharma**

## DEPUTY PM (Acting)

**Ken Freeman**

## Deputy pm for technology R&D

**Kurt Swieringa**

## Deputy pm for technology T&E

**Wanessa Priesmeyer**

## Latest ATM-X Project News

				More ATM-X News                			

Article4 Min Read
NASA Machine Learning Air Traffic Software Saves Fuel

Article8 Min Read
NASA Delivers on Making Gate to Gate Flights More Efficient

4 Min Read
Advanced Air Mobility Looks Ahead to Automation
Article2 Min Read
NASA Competition Seeks Student Data Crunchers for Runway Solutions
Article4 Min Read
NASA Invites Collaboration to Define Sky for All
Article

## Advanced Air Mobility Looks Ahead to Automation

Using software to handle tasks to assist people is not a new concept – look at our computers, cell phones or electric cars.
				Learn More About AAM and Automation                                     about Advanced Air Mobility Looks Ahead to Automation

## Air Traffic Management eXploration Gallery

5 Images

Go To Gallery

Go To Gallery

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

3 min readSystem-Wide Safety CollaborationsArticle										3 weeks ago									

1 min readNASA Langley Participates in Drone Responders ConferenceArticle										2 months ago									

5 min readMath, Mentorship, Motherhood: Behind the Scenes with NASA EngineersArticle										4 months ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Aeronautics

Airspace Operations and Safety Program

Drones & You

Flight Innovation
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jesup & Lamont, Inc. (the
"Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven M.
Rabinovici, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Alan Weichselbaum
                      
                      March 26, 2010Alan
      Weichselbaum, Chief Executive Officer
                      
                      Date(Principal
      Executive Officer)
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 TAHITI THREE, LLC, a 2 New Mexico Limited 3 Liability Company, 4 Plaintiff-Appellee, 5

v. No. A-1-CA-36851 6 ERIC SANDOVAL and 7 EARTH PRODUCTS, LLC 8 a New Mexico Limited 9 Liability Company, 10 Defendants-Appellants. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 12 Valerie A. Huling, District Judge 13 Michael Danoff 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellee 16 James A. Chavez 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellants 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION 20 ZAMORA, Judge. 212 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for th e reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED. 3

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

5 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge 9

10 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge 11
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6889
RAFAEL J. DOMINGUEZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-ct-03088-FL) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rafael J. Dominguez, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Lockridge, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rafael J. Dominguez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dominguez v. Bureau of Prisons , No. 5:06-ct03088-FL (E.D.N.C. June 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Pate *v.*Swann and Others.

*Tuesday, November 25.*

Under the act of 1843, an execution-defendant may claim as exempt from execution, at any time before the sale, any personal property levied on, not exceeding in value 125 dollars.

ERROR to the *Union*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This was an action of trespass against the defendants in error for forcibly taking away two of the plaintiff’s horses, &c., in *November,*1844. One of the defendants, *Cason,*pleaded in bar as follows: That the other defendants, on the 20th of *September,*1844, recovered a judgment against the present plaintiff, *Pate,*for 73 dollars; that a *fieri facias*was issued on the judgment, and was delivered to the defendant, *Cason,*as sheriff to be executed; that this defendant levied the execution upon the property mentioned in the de*501claration, and sold the same, &c. This plea was replied to as follows: That on, &c., after the levy of the execution and before the sale, the plaintiff being a householder, claimed of the sheriff the property levied on as exempt from execution; that the value of said property, including the articles owned by the plaintiff and designated by statute as exempt from execution, did not exceed 125 dollars.

*J. S. Reid*and *8. E. Perkins,*for the plaintiff.

*J. Perry*and *J. Yaryan,*for the defendants.

General demurrer to the replication, and judgment for the defendants.

There is an irregularity in this case. Only one of the defendants pleaded, and on a demurrer to a replication to his plea, the Court gave judgment for all the defendants.

We think the Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the replication. The statute governing this case reserves to 'an execution-defendant the right of selecting, as exempt from execution, personal property not exceeding in value 125 dollars. It repeals all laws coming within its purview, and says that nothing in the revised laws of that session should be construed to contravene or repeal any of its provisions. R. S. 1843, pp. 1046, 7, ss. 9, 14. The replication states that, previously to the sale,, the plaintiff claimed of the- sheriff, as exempt from execution, the horses levied on, and avers that their value did not exceed 125 dollars. That is, under the statute, a good answer, to the plea. That part of the replication which speaks of articles designated by statute as exempt from execution, may be considered as surplusage.That the claim was made in time is settled-, under a statute similar to that above cited so far,as that matter is concerned, by the ease of *Stephens et al.*v. *Lawson, Nov.*term, 1844.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### C. Eli-Jah Hakeem MUHAMMAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.A. HOOD, ADX-Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-1217.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2003.

C. Elijah Hakeem Muhammad, Florence, CO, pro se.

Before TACHA, Chief Judge, McKAY and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unani*884mously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner C. Eli-Jah Hakeem Muhammad, a prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus action challenging a prison disciplinary conviction. He contends that the prison disciplinary proceeding violated his substantive and procedural due process rights, as well as various Bureau of Prison program statements. The district court dismissed. We review the case de novo, construing petitioner’s claims liberally on account of his lack of legal counsel.

The district court reviewed each of petitioner’s claims, and stated and applied the correct legal standards. See *Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 563-66, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); *Superintendent v. Hill,*472 U.S. 445, 454, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985). We have reviewed petitioner’s arguments and record submissions on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or fees is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the *884case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. at September  30, 1998,  and its statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  for the nine  months
ended September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,691,723<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,013
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         27,614,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,571,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,570,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,557,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,570,962
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,547,583
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  548,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,352,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,352,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,352,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund XIV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Includes $398,539 in restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.5



                                            December 27, 2001



Stephen M. Cohen
Stonepath Group, Inc., General Counsel
Two Penn Center, Suite 605
Philadelphia, PA  19102

         RE:  Modification to Employment Agreement

Dear Steve,

         This letter agreement is intended to constitute a formal binding
modification to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Stonepath
Group, Inc. (the "Company") dated April 19, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement")
with respect to the following subject matter:

         1. Modification to Base Salary. Effective as of December 31, 2001, the
Base Salary under your Employment Agreement shall be reduced from $250,000 to
$200,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a termination under
Sections 6.2(d) and 6.2(e) of the Employment Agreement, your Basic Compensation
shall remain as set forth in the Employment Agreement, and any severance
arrangements or payments made thereunder shall be made on the same basis as set
forth within your Employment Agreement, irrespective of this modification
letter.

         2. Settlement Amount. In recognition of the foregoing, the Company
agrees to pay you, in settlement of any and all claims that you may otherwise
have with respect to the modification to your Employment Agreement, the sum of
$116,903 (the "Settlement Amount"), net of applicable withholdings taxes,
payable as follows:

               (a)    $50,000 on or before January 30, 2002;
               (b)    $50,000 on or before January 30, 2003;
               (c)    $16,903 on or before January 30, 2004.

         3. Credit against certain Severance benefits. In the event
circumstances arise in which you are entitled to a severance benefit under your
Employment Agreement, and as provided in Section 1 above, you agree that portion
of the Settlement Amount not yet paid, yet due and owing to you under Section 2
above will be credited against such severance benefit.




<PAGE>



December 27, 2001
Page Two


         4. Miscellaneous.

               (a)  Capitalized terms utilized in this Letter Agreement shall,
                    unless otherwise defined herein, have the meaning ascribed
                    under the Employment Agreement;


               (b)  Except as set forth in this Letter Agreement, the Employment
                    Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


         Would you kindly place your signature on the line provided below
indicating your agreement to the terms set forth above.




                                            Sincerely,


                                            STONEPATH GROUP, INC.






                        BY: /s/ Dennis L. Pelino
                            -----------------------------
                            Dennis L. Pelino
                            Chairman and CEO


Accepted by:

/s/ Stephen M. Cohen
--------------------------------
STEPHEN M. COHEN

DATED:  12/27/2001
        --------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Balance  Sheet at June 30, 1997  (unaudited)  and the  Condensed
Statement of Operations for the quarter ended  June 30, 1997 (unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000892160                         
<NAME>                            Derma Sciences, Inc.                       
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                               144,962       
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        798,851                        
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          779,097         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,811,026        
<PP&E>                                94,858     
<DEPRECIATION>                             0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     3,603,323        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,971,907       
<BONDS>                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                0 
<COMMON>                              40,676      
<OTHER-SE>                         1,495,740     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       3,603,323      
<SALES>                              796,246      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     796,246    
<CGS>                                225,852     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        225,852      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    10,926     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,118,035)        
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,118,035)        
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0 
<CHANGES>                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,118,035)        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.27)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0 
        

</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2044

AN ACT

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2044 ES

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur3 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

4 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be held

5 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

6 United States for permanent residence as of the date of

7 enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa

8 fees.

9 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

10 Upon the granting of permanent residence to

11 Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of State

12 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the

13 current fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas

14 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

15 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

16 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Passed the Senate October 11, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2044

AN ACT

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.
Updated September 2023

Application for Aerospace Medicine Clerkship

NASA/Johnson Space Center

Medical Operations/SD2

Houston, TX 77058

APPLICANT INFORMATION

First Name Middle Initial Last

Phone No. Sex

( ) - M F

Street Address City State ZIP Code

Student Resident Attending Military Civilian

Member of 

MD DO PharmD

Citizenship Email address Indicate the rotation (Month and Year) you are interested in:

US Citizen Legal Permanent Resident April 20__ October 20__ 

Have you previously applied?

Yes No If yes, when? 

Member of 

AsMA AMSRO

MEDICAL SCHOOL INFORMATION

NAME OF MEDICAL SCHOOL: 

Street Address City State ZIP

 

Year Entered: Graduation Date: 

UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

NAME OF COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY: 

Street Address City State ZIP

Degree: Major: Graduation Date: 

GRADUATE EDUCATION

NAME OF GRADUATE SCHOOL: 

Street Address City State ZIP

Degree: Major: Graduation Date: 

EXPERIENCE

****Please include all Work Experience, Research Experience, Publications, Community Service in your CV/resume in lieu of 

listing here****

Future Career Goals: 

Previous NASA Experience: (List, with dates, any program participation, research, or other work performed at any of the NASA centers). 
Updated September 2023

INSTRUCTIONS:

The following items must be submitted to complete your application package:

1. A separate statement of no more than one typed page stating the reasons you wish to participate in this clerkship.

2. A letter from your medical school or institution stating that: (a) you are a student in good academic standing, (b) your medical school 

has approved this elective for your individual course of study, and (c) you are recommended for this clerkship. For residents or 

practicing physicians please include a letter from your direct supervisor.

3. 4

th year students: An official copy of your medical school transcript.

 Resident or other: Copy of your diploma

4. A current Curriculum Vitae.

5. A completed “Application for Aerospace Medicine Clerkship” Form.

The deadline for complete application packages is June 1 for the October clerkship and December 1 for the April clerkship. 

Mail or send via encrypted email all completed forms and application materials in the 1-5 order above to: 

Amy Honors

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Mail Code SD222

2101 NASA Parkway

Houston, Texas 77058

(281) 483-7050

amy.n.honors@nasa.gov