alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_______________________________

06

- 19

- 00254

- CR

_______________________________
LAWRENCE MORGAN , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 17F0521

- 005

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the reporter’s record and the clerk’s record indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record contain the name of a person who was a minor at t he time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) pro vides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record contain sen sitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: Augus t 31, 2020
INFINITY SCIENCE CENTER, INC

Outreach STEM Education: Bringing NASA 

STEM Education to local communities 

through local county library systems and 

INFINITY Science Center

Donna Torres

8/1/23 - 7/31/25

INFINITY Science Center is bringing Outreach STEM to 

the coastal Mississippi Library Systems. We have 

partnered with Hancock, Harrison, and the City of Long 

Beach Library systems to bring NASA is With You 

When you Fly and Moon to Mars to branch 

communities for children 6-16 and to hold STEMFest at 

INFINITY Science Center each spring during the grant 

program at no cost to those who attend the library 

sessions. By bringing STEM experiences to the 

libraries we can reach diverse populations and 

encourage STEM-related career paths and interest.

List of Partners:

• Hancock, Harrison and City of Long Beach 

Library Systems

Mississippi students view a solar eclipse at

INFINITY Science Center in August 2017

Credits: NASA/SSC The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC23K0807, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40326 Summary Calendar

STATE OF TEXAS; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF INDIANA, ET AL

.,

Plaintiff s

– Appellees

,

v ersus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL

.,

Defendant s ,

MITCHELL WILLIAMS,

Movant

– Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CV

- 254

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
December 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40326 Document: 00513316351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2015No. 15

- 40326

2 Mitchell Williams requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis

( “ IFP ” ) in his appeal o f the denial of his pro se motion to intervene. A movant

seeking leave to proceed IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that

the appeal is taken in good faith, i.e. , that i t presents nonfrivolous issues.

Carson v . Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Frivolous is defined as

“lack[ing] an arguable basis in law or fact.” Taylor v. Johnson , 257 F.3d 470,

472 (5th Cir. 2001). “A ruling denying intervention of right is reviewed de

novo.” Edwards v. City of Ho uston , 78 F.3d 983, 995 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The district court did not err in denying Williams’s request to intervene

because, inter alia

, he does not have an “interest relating to the property or

transaction that is the subject of the action.” F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 24(a)(2). A n

intervenor fails to show a sufficient interest wh e re he seeks to intervene solely

for econo mic reasons. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line

Co. , 732 F.2d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1984) (en banc). Williams ’s motion to intervene

was based on an asserted economic interest ; thus, it was insufficient to merit

intervention of right. See id.

Accordingly, the motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED

, and the

appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42 .2. Case: 15-40326 Document: 00513316351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2015
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF THE ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY INCREASING ITS RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF THE ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR A REVISION OF RATE SCHEDULE EA AND MA. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF THE ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY INCREASING ITS RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF BALLY’S PARK PLACE, INC., FOR REMOVAL FROM THE SUBCLASS REQUIRED TO PAY THE MARGINAL ENERGY ADJUSTMENT CHARGE AND FOR REINSTATEMENT TO THE CLASS OF ALL OTHER CUSTOMERS WHICH PAY THE LEVELIZED ENERGY ADJUSTMENT CHARGE.

June 19, 1984.

Petitions for certification denied.
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

                                     For the years ended        August 19, 1999
                                     June 30,                    (Inception) to
                                     2003              2002       June 30, 2003
CASH FLOWS
FROM
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)               $(460)              $(5,550)        $(9,785)
Increase in
accounts
payable                    460                 5,550             7,210

Net cash
(used) by
operating
activities                     -                      -                (2,575)

CASH FLOWS
FROM
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from
stock issuances         -                        -               2,575

Net cash
provided by
financing
activities                    -                        -               2,575

Net increase
in cash                                                                  -
Cash   beginning                                                    -
Cash   ending                                                        -

Supplemental
disclosures:
Interest paid              -                          -                 -
Income taxes
paid                          -                          -                 -

Non-cash
transactions:
Shares issued
for dividend                -                           -           $2,000

Number of
shares issued            -                           -         2,000,000
for dividend

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.
Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from Penn Octane
Corporation's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for the quarterly period ended
January 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                     1255574
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              9985912
<ALLOWANCES>                                521067
<INVENTORY>                                4803969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          16106203
<PP&E>                                     9412121
<DEPRECIATION>                             1833104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            25043915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     15419483
<BONDS>                                     128034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    129011
<OTHER-SE>                                 9367387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              25043915
<SALES>                                   34977731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          34977731
<CGS>                                     32788080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             32788080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1579437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          303997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            3349241
<INCOME-TAX>                                 70000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        3279241
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               3279241
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Graham J. Siddall, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Credence Systems
Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this quarterly report; and



3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report.



Date:
March 17, 2003



|/S/ GRAHAM J. SIDDALL
|---------------------
|Graham J. Siddall    

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Sam Mealie et al., Appellants, v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 617]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven dated May 15, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioners’ application for certain area vari*704anees, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered June 19, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly upheld the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven, which denied the petitioner’s application for certain area variances for the purpose of constructing a single-family dwelling *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304, 308 [2002]; *Matter of Sasso v Osgood,*86 NY2d 374, 382, 384 [1995]; Town Law § 267-b [3]; *see also Matter of Chandler Prop. v Trotta,*9 AD3d 408 [2004]; *Matter of Milburn Homes v Trotta,*7 AD3d 531 [2004]; *Matter of Kuhlman v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven,*305 AD2d 683 [2003]; *Matter of Inguant v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven,*304 AD2d 831 [2003]).

The petitioners’ remaining contention is improperly raised for the first time on appeal and we decline to consider it in the exercise of our discretion. Crane, J.P., Spolzino, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES JOHNSON.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

GRACE RANDAZZO, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v.

CH2M HILL, INC.; CH2M HILL 

COMPANIES, LTD; DUDLEY WRIGHT, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-1457

(D.C. No. 1:13-CV-03276-MSK-KLM)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The stipulation filed by the parties to dismiss the captioned appeal is granted. 

Each party shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 7, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-1457 Document: 01019472233 Date Filed: 08/07/2015 Page: 1
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH v. TO FIX THE COMPENSATION TO BE PAID FOR THE PROPERTY OF SNYDER-WESTERLIND CORPORATION.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. .(See 156 *N. J. Super.*188)
#### EDWARD M. TAYLOR v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 December 8, 2023 

 Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group 

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Aero Club 75th

Annual Wright Brothers Memorial Dinner on December 15, 2023 

On December 15, 2023, the Aero Club, a nonprofit organization under section 501(c)(6) of the 

Internal Revenue Code, will host an awards dinner at the Downtown Westin Washington Hotel, 

999 9th St., NW, Washington, DC, 20001, starting at 6:30 p.m. The Aero Club is in control of 

the organizing, planning and sending of invitations to this event. The event honors the National 

Aeronautics Association’s Wright Brothers Memorial Trophy recipient Captain Robert Crippen 

for “... his significant public service of enduring value to aviation in the United States.”

Approximately over 2000 people are expected to attend this event. Attendees will have a 

diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, 

representatives of the U.S. legislative branch, state and local officials, representatives from the 

media, academia, industry, and international partner organizations. The estimated value of the 

dinner, including all food and drinks, is approximately $285 per person. Attendance at this event 

will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs with 

attendees from other organizations. I find that these event meets the requirements of a "widely 

attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. §2635.204(g). I further determine that there is an 

Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend these events because it will provide an 

opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, 

programs, and operations. 

NASA employees — including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role in a 

matter affecting the interests of the Aero Club may accept an invitation for free attendance for 

themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in 

attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly 

influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees whose duties have a significant role in any matter affecting the 

interests of the Aero Club, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating a 
2

Space Act Agreement should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as 

to whether they may accept the invitation for free attendance. 

Adam F. Greenstone
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1302

___________

Calvin Silva, *

*

Petitioner-Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District 

* of Nebraska.

Robert Houston, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent-Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 25, 2008 

Filed: November 21, 2008

___________

Before BYE, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Houston, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services,

appeals the district court’s1

 decision to grant Calvin Silva’s Petition for a Writ of

Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and to order Silva’s immediate release.

Reviewing the district court’s conclusions of law de novo and its factual findings for

clear error, Randolph v. Kenna, 276 F.3d 401, 403 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of

review), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2304 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2304

 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
        irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2004

   Mr. Hagel introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
        irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION WATER.

    Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 
(86 Stat. 969) is amended by striking ``fifty-three thousand acres'' 
and inserting ``approximately 53,000 acres''.
                                 <all>
```
S. 2022

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in Carbondale,

Illinois the ‘‘Senator Paul Simon Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL BUILDING.

The Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in

Carbondale, Illinois shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Senator

Paul Simon Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCE.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or

other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator

Paul Simon Federal Building.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          89,650
<SECURITIES>                                    20,238
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,023
<INVENTORY>                                    166,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               522,018
<PP&E>                                          69,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,036
<BONDS>                                            298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           344
<OTHER-SE>                                     386,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,406
<SALES>                                        529,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               529,503
<CGS>                                          442,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  517,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
                                               
                                               

</TABLE>