alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lacy *v.*Fairman.—In error.

*Monday, December*8.

THE failure of a justice of the peace, in the case of an appeal, to file the papers in the clerk’s office in time, is no cause for dismissing the appeal. R. S. 1843, p. 892.

The filing of an appeal-bond with the transcript, &c., in the clerk’s office by the justice, in the case of such appeal, is *prima facie*evidence that he had approved of the bond.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gladys Boykin,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03589-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8269 Filed 10/19/17 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Imperia Bros. Inc., Petitioner, v Raymond P. Martinez, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 660]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Appeals Board, dated January 21, 2003, which confirmed so much of the findings of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, as found that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 (9) and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the stopping and weighing of its truck pursuant to a neutral, nondiscriminatory pattern of selection did not violate constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures *(see*US Const 4th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 12; *Matter of Metro Demolition Contr. Corp. v Martinez,*12 AD3d 513 [2004]; *Matter of Ferrara Bros. Bldg. Materials Corp. v Martinez,*11 AD3d 214 [2004]; *Matter of DeFelippis Enters. v Martinez,*11 AD3d 533 [2004]; *Matter of Masons v Martinez,*8 AD3d 671 [2004]; *Matter of City Hawk Indus. v Martinez, 2*AD3d 635 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0148 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL QUERFURTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 14 2022

11/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0148
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2923

_____________________________

MAXINE LAKESHA DAVIS-EAKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

August 27, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Megan Lynne Long, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Eliz N. Arnold et al *v.*John Brehmer et al.

Dower — Right to Collect Rents on Mansion House until Dower Assigned. Though the rents from a deceased estate including the mansion house,

may amount to more than the wife’s one-third of the rental value of the whole estate, she cannot be deprived of the rents to her exclusively from the mansion house, since she - is entitled to hold that and curtilage without charge until her dower may be assigned her.

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 16, 1868.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin:

It does not appear from the averments of the petition that Mrs. McBurnett was not entitled to all the rent of the store house occupied by Garam & Oo. in her right as widow of W. D. Arnold, her dower not having been assigned; and there being a farm of about 227 acres, of land belonging to the estate as well as the store house rented to Garam & Oo. and the dwelling occupied by McBurnett and wife. The allegation that the rental value of the dwelling house was more than one-third of the rental value of the whole estate may be true and yet Mrs. McBurnett may have been *511entitled to collect and retain the rents of the store house until dower should be assigned her, as by the 9th section of Article 4 of Chapter 47 of the Eevised Statutes (2nd Vol., 26), she was entitled to hold the mansion house and curtilage without charge therefor until the allotment of her dower.

*Brown*& *Murrayfor appellants.*

*Wilson, for appellees.*

It seems to us the court properly sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the petition and dissolved the injunction, and as the plaintiffs would not plead further, the action was rightly dismissed.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
#### Isham G. Sellars &c., *v.*Samuel D. Sutton.

Instructions — Adverse'Possession—Conflict of Proof is Question for Jury.

Where the proof does not clearly show whether the possession of a plaintiff was as joint tenant and therefore not adverse in law, or was .in severalty, and therefore apparently adverse in both Jaw and fact, it is error for the Court to exclude, by an instruction, this question from the consideration of the jury.

APPEAL PROM (HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 22, 1868.

Grochett, *for appellants.*

Vance, *for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Bobertson:

No platt being exhibited there is much difficulty in applying the testimony as to the possessory claim of the appellant Sellars. Whether his possession was as joint tenant, and therefore not adverse in law, or was in severalty and therefore apparently adverse in both law and fact, the record does not clearly show. The jury ought to have been permitted to decide that question.

On the facts appearing in the record the circuit court should not assume that Sellar’s possession was not in law, as well as in fact, adverse for 15, or even 20 years. And therefore there is apparent error in the instruction excluding that question from the consideration of the jury.

Oonsequently for this only apparent error, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
EXHIBIT 31.4





Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Dermod Ranaghan, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cartesian, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





BY:/s/ DERMOD RANAGHANDermod RanaghanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





Date: April 27, 2018
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY

Rockets and Robots

Joseph W Kabbes

2/1/22 -1/31/24

Students learn about rockets and how they play a 

critical role in space exploration, including the creation 

of future bases on the Moon and Mars, experimenting

with low-power water rockets to understand concepts 

such as energy, reaction mass and thrust. Small, 

inexpensive robots allow student exploration of 

sensors, motors and how robots can be used to explore 

and create. This program leverages the organization’s 

Planetarium and Exploratorium, and ongoing STEM 

outreach, to provide students with a deeper 

understanding of NASA missions and priorities, and 

how these affect our everyday life.

Christopher and Trevor code their maze-running 

robot.

Credits: Fayettsville State University

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0439, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
No. D-664.

#### In re Disbarment of Wittmaack.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 484 U. S. 973.]
#### STATE v. McRORIE

No. 508P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 504

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Office of the 

Administrator

Administrator

Deputy Administrator

Associate Administrator

Chief of Staff Chief Safety & 

Mission Assurance

Inspector General

NASA Advisory Groups

Chief Engineer

Aeronautics Research

Exploration Systems

Science

Space Operations

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Information Officer

General Counsel

Integrated Enterprise 

Management Program

Innovative Partnership Program

Security & Program Protection

Chief Health & Medical Officer

Institutions & Management

Program Analysis 

& Evaluation

Mission Directorates Mission Support Offices

Strategic Communications

 

NASA Shared Services Center 

Human Capital Management 

Infrastructure and Administration 

Diversity and Equal Opportunity* 

Procurement 

Small and Disadvantaged 

Business Utilization*

Education 

External Relations 

Legislative Affairs 

Public Affairs

Ames Research Center

Dryden Flight Research Center

Glenn Research Center

NASA Centers

Goddard Space Flight Center

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Johnson Space Center

Kennedy Space Center

Langley Research Center

Marshall Space Flight Center

Stennis Space Center

* In accordance with law, the offices of Diversity and Equal Opportunity and Small and Disadvantaged Business 

Utilization maintain reporting relationships to the Deputy Administrator and Administrator.
I I I I ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTIUTOI FOR OFFICE OF IPMMIONS AND OFFICE OF 

coNRIu7mNs LEGISLATIM GENERAL COUNSEL 

- ------ -L)TUIOR 

SPACE SCIENCE BOARD 

DWWY AD~lNlSllAlOl 

ASSISTANT OFFICE OF OFFICE OF 

EXECUTIVE OFFICER ADMINISTRATOR FOR PLMS 6 PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL KYID AFFAIRS MLlC AFFAIRS 

OF YATIONAL OF XIENCES ACADEMY 

MANAGEMENT EVALUATION PROGRAMS DEVELOPMENT 

I 1 I 

t I 

GRANTS 6 GEOPHYSICS 6 

RE SEARCH ASTRONOMY 

CONTRACTS PROGRAMS 

1 1 

LAUNCH VEHICLES PROGRAM REVIEW 

6 PROPULSION 6 RESOURCES 

PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT 

I I 

I MNNED AMES 

SPACECRAFT RESEARCH 

CENTER CENTER 

I 

1 GODDARD 

SPACE FLIGHT 

CENTER 

LANGLEY 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

Hampton, Vo. 

LEWIS 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

Cleveland, Ohio 

LANGLEY 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

Hampton, Vo. 

LEWIS 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

Cleveland, Ohio 

I 

SPACE FLIGHT 

SYSTEMS 

SCIENCE AND 

APPLICATIONS 

DEVELOPMENT 

INFOIIhUTION 

ASSOCIATE ADMlNlStlUTOR 

DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR 

nocams 

C0011DINATION 

OFFKE OF 

PROGRMAMING 

ASSURANCE 

REPRESENTATIVE 

OFFICE 

6 DATA 

OF 

ACQUISITION 

TRACKING 

FOR DEFEl AFFAIRS SAFETY 6 HEALTH 

ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF 

INDUSTRIAL 

APP IC T NS 

COMMITTEE 

I 

AbVkdPY OFFICE OF 

I I 

APPLICATIONS 

I OFFICE OF I OFFICE OF NASA RESEARCH TECH. PROGRAM ADVANCED RESEARCH AND 

TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEES 

OFFICE OF 

STEERING SPACE SCIENCES I MANNED SPACE 

FLIGHT I APPLICATIONS 

PROGRAM REVIEW METEOROLOGICAL 6 RESOURCES 

SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 

I 1 

I 

I I I 1 ELECTRONICS BIOTECHNOLOGY I RESEARCH PROPULSION 

LCONTROL 6 HUMAN I AND POWER 

GENERATION RESEARCH 

I I COMMUNICASYSTEMS 

INDUSTRIAL 

APPLICATIONS PLANETARY I TIONS I I MISSIONS 

I 

-- 

I PACIFIC 

LAUNCH OPERATIONS I I OFFICE 

SPACE NUCLEAR 

PROPULSION I OFFICE 

NORTHEASTERN WESTERN 

OFFICE 1 I OPERATIONS 

OFFICE 

I Combridge, I I hnta Monica, Calif. 

APPROVED o.t-.f; ADMINISTRATOR, NASA 

.- 

DATE NaV. 2 3 ,I?&& 

AUGUST 17, 1962 

SUPERSEDES CHART DATED I GEORGE c. MARSHALL 

SPACE FLIGHT I CENTER 

JET PROPULSION 

LABORATORY 

(Contracta Oprotcd) 

Paradem, Calif. 

FLIGHT 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

Edwards, 61if. 

WALLOPS 

STATION 

Wollopr Island, Va. 

LAUNCH 

OPERATIONS 

CENTER 

Cam kh, Flo. 

I I 

6PQ SS67tO
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 5, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CRAIG T. WILLIAMS

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 10-3097

(D.C. No. 6:99-CR-10092-WEB-2)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1

and 10 Cir. R. 3.3(B). th

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3097 Document: 01018471971 Date Filed: 08/05/2010 Page: 1
NASA Advanced Air Mobility Partnerships National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

WA 

ID 

OR 

MT

ND

WI

MI

IL

NJ 

DE 

MD 

DC VA 

WV 

KY 

NC 

SC 

GA 

TN 

AL 

FL 

TX 

CA 

MO 

AR 

LA 

MS 

OK 

WY 

CO 

UT 

NV 

AZ NM 

WA 

ID 

OR 

MT ND 

SD 

MN 

IA 

WI 

MI 

IL IN OH 

PA 

NY MA 

CT 

VT 

NH 

KS 

NE 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SD

MN

IA

IN OH

PA

NY MA

CT

VT

NH

ME 

This map shows the 

locations of companies, 

academic institutions, and 

other government agencies 

who work with NASA to 

conduct Advanced Air 

Mobility (AAM) research. 

This research will benefit a 

future transportation 

system that includes 

routine flight of air taxis 

and drones. Learn more at: 

www.nasa.gov/aam 

CANADA FRANCE 

GERMANY 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entity Listing by State 

ALABAMA 

Boeing–Huntsville 

CALIFORNIA 

AeroVironment–Simi Valley 

Archer Aviation–San Jose 

Joby Aviation–Santa Cruz 

Northrop Grumman–Palmdale 

Stanford University–Stanford 

U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development 

Command (DEVCOM) and U.S. Navy Office 

of Naval Research–Moffett Field 

Wisk–Mountain View 

Xwing–San Francisco 

Zipline–San Francisco 

CONNECTICUT 

Lockheed Martin-Sikorsky–Bridgeport 

FLORIDA 

AIRT–Miami 

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University–Daytona 

Beach 

The City of Orlando–Orlando 

University of Central Florida (UCF)–Orlando 

INDIANA 

Notre Dame University–South Bend 

IOWA 

Iowa State–Ames 

MARYLAND 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

(NIST)–Gaithersburg 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Massachusetts Department of Transportation– 

Boston 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)– 

Cambridge 

MIT / Lincoln Labs–Lexington 

Mitre–Bedford 

MINNESOTA 

Minnesota Department of Transportation–St. Paul 

NEW YORK 

Moog–East Aurora 

General Electric Company–Niskayuna 

OHIO 

AFWERX–Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 

Air Force Research Laboratory Aerospace 

Systems Directorate (AFRL)–WrightPatterson Air Force Base 

A&P Technology–Cincinnati 

Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)– 

Springfield 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Penn State University–State College 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

Aerostar–Sioux Falls 

TENNESSEE 

Vanderbilt University–Nashville 

TEXAS 

Lone Star UAS Center of Excellence and 

Innovation at Texas A&M University–Corpus 

Christi 

North Central Texas Council of Governments 

–Arlington 

University of Texas–Austin 

VIRGINIA 

AURA Network Systems–McLean 

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency 

(DARPA)–Arlington 

Longbow–Hampton 

Northrop Grumman–West Falls Church 

Old Dominion University–Norfolk 

Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU)– 

Richmond 

U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development 

Command (DEVCOM) and U.S. Navy Office 

of Naval Research–Arlington 

WASHINGTON DC 

George Washington University (GWU) 

OTHER COUNTRIES 

CANADA 

Université de Sherbrooke–Quebec 

FRANCE 

ONERA (Office National d'Etudes et de 

Recherches Aérospatiales)–The French 

Aerospace Lab–Palaiseau 

GERMANY 

DLR - German Aerospace Center–Braunschweig 

& Cologne
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>    5

<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CARRAMERICA
REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,
2000 AND FROM CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             65,596
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      31,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                          3,109,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                    366,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,318,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                         1,432,972
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            93
<COMMON>                                              663
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,687,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,318,363
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  286,005
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     229,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    68,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                62,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                     32,308
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       95,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.12



</TABLE>
#### The State *v.*Wilder.—In error.

*Tuesday,*December 23.

INDICTMENT against' a justice of the peace for failing to return to the clerk’s office, &c., a certificate of the solemnization of a marriage, &c. *Held,*that an averment as to a license having issued was unnecessary, and should be rejected as surplusage. *The State*v. *M'Whinney,*5 Blackf. 364.
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the annual report of GeneMax Corp.  (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for fiscal  year ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Ronald L.
Handford,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Grant R. Atkins,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  each  certifies for the purpose of complying
with Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(the  "Exchange  Act") and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Exchange Act; and 2.  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
   operations of the Company.




 Date:  April 14, 2004           /s/ RONALD L. HANDFORD
                                 _______________________________________________
                                 Ronald L. Handford
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


 Date: April 14, 2004            /s/ GRANT R. ATKINS
                                 _______________________________________________
                                 Grant R. Atkins
                                 Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 April 10, 2023

Reply to Attention of: General Law PracticeGroup

TO: 

FROM:

Distribution

Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Dinner on May 18, 2023

The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), a not-for-profit 

organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold the 

Awards Gala Dinner on May 18, 2023, at the John F. Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, 

from 5:30 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. AIAA is in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing 

invitations for this event. The event will provide an opportunity for informal discussion 

on general space topics as well as presenting the annual achievement awards.

Approximately 400 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a 

diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, 

representatives of the legislative branch, and representatives from academia and industry. 

The estimated cost of the event, including all food, beverages and items listed above, is 

approximately $425 per person ($220 for food and refreshments). Attendance at this 

event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA 

programs. I find that the event meets the requirements of a "widely attended gathering" 

as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas 

and views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs and operations. NASA employees -

including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989 - who do not have a significant role in a matter

affecting the interests of AIAA may accept an invitation for free attendance for 

themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency' s 

interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear 

to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate 

determination from their local NASA ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the 

invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone