alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         433,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               599,123
<PP&E>                                         210,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 809,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,478,720)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   809,534
<SALES>                                        103,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,819
<CGS>                                          105,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,575,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,468,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,468,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,468,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
#### Thomas Green *v.*John P. Winston.

Pleadings — Value — Amount — Damages — Judgment — Jury — Supersedeas Bond — Attorney’s Fees.

Allegations of value or of amount of damage shall not be considered as true by the failure to controvert them.

The assessment of the value of rents cannot be done without proof.

No attorney fee can be recovered in a suit on a supersedeas bond.

APPEAL FROM - CIRCUIT COURT.

February 3, 1863.

Opinion of the Oourt by

Judge Williams:

. Winston obtained a judgment against Cox for land then in controversy.

*348Cox appeals from the judgment and, on executing bond, obtained a supersedeas, that judgment being affirmed.

Winston brought this suit against Cox and appellants, as his surety on the supersedeas bond, to recover $47.90 costs on the affirmance, for rents which he alleges to have been worth $500 after the execution of the bond, also $250 attorney’s fees.

For want of answer the court below rendered judgment against appellant for $547.09, without evidence, and without the intervention of a jury, to correct which this appeal is prosecuted.

“Allegations of value, or of amount of damage, shall not be considered as true by the failure to controvert them.” - Section 153, Civil Code.

The court manifestly erred in assessing the value of the rents without proof. Daniels *v.*Judah, 14 B. Mon. 316.

No attorney’s fee was embraced by the bond. This case is essentially different from the cases of Harris *v.*Ray, 15 B. Mon. 630; Francis *v.*Francis, 18 B. Mon. 60.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009
of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) upon my best knowledge and belief
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|                        |                                                                                                                | 
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  August 14, 2009 | /s/ Edward J. Quilty                                                                                           | 
|                        | Edward J. Quilty
        Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
#### A. & B. FOODS, INC. v. ROGERS TRAILER PARK, INC.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.                          March 30, 2007
---------------------------                          --------------
Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., President                        Date
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(B)

                    AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(B)(4)(III)
                                OF REGULATION S-K


           The Registrant hereby undertakes and agrees to furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of any instrument
relating to, or defining the rights of the holders of, any long-term debt of the
Registrant and/or its subsidiaries, a copy of which has not been filed in
reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K or which, although
previously filed, shall have become stale in the sense of Item 10(d) of
Regulation S-K or which shall have been disposed of by the Commission pursuant
to its Record Control Schedule. This Agreement and undertaking is intended to be
effective with respect to Registrant's Long-term Debt instruments whether
securities have been issued thereunder or are yet to be issued thereunder.




Date: March 15, 2000
      --------------
                                   By:     /s/ Benjamin W. Rawlins, Jr.
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                              Benjamin W. Rawlins, Jr.
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rohit Patel,  Principal Executive Officer of English Language Learning and
Instruction System, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   April 19, 2005

/s/ Rohit Patel
 ----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 29, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

RUSSEL CIPRIANO AGUILERA,

 Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States

Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-9529

ORDER

This case was transferred to this court from the U.S. District Court for the District

of New Mexico. The district court determined that petitioner was seeking judicial review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Although the district court was

unable to determine if the filing was timely because petitioner did not provide a copy of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision, the district court nevertheless transferred the

case to this court. Doc. 7, No. 09-CV-1191 (D. N.M. May 5, 2010).

This court opened a review proceeding, and directed petitioner to file a petition for

review in compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 15 on or before June 10, 2010. Petitioner was

expressly directed to attach a copy of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision to the

petition for review.

Appellate Case: 10-9529 Document: 01018449052 Date Filed: 06/29/2010 Page: 1 
2

When the court did not receive a petition for review with attachments by June 10,

on June 14, 2010 the court sent petitioner a deficiency letter allowing him an additional

opportunity to comply with the court’s directives on or before June 24, 2010.

On June 22, 2010, the court received from petitioner a copy of a document he had

filed in the district court on December 11, 2009, and a document he captioned as an

opening brief. Although a copy of a cover letter from the Board of Immigration Appeals

accompanied the documents, there was no copy of the Board’s decision, as petitioner had

twice been directed to provide.

Petitioner was advised in the court’s directive of June 14, 2010 that the failure to

comply with the court’s directives would result in dismissal of the case. This case is

accordingly dismissed pursuant to Tenth Cir. R. 42.1 for failure to prosecute. 

 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER

Clerk of Court

by:

Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-9529 Document: 01018449052 Date Filed: 06/29/2010 Page: 2
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the general
partner of the  Partnership,  hereby  certify  that  hereby  certify  that to my
knowledge:


               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

August 19, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment No. 1
on Form 10-KSB/A to the Annual Report of Scivanta Medical Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David R. LaVance,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),
and,




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May
      29, 2009
              By:
              /s/ David R. LaVanceDavid
      R. LaVancePresident
      and Chief Executive
                Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                   Nine months ended
                                                                        July 31,                            July 31,
                                                            ------------------------------       -----------------------------
                                                                 1997              1996               1997             1996
                                                            ------------      ------------       ------------     ------------
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>                <C>              <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding                               21,857            21,551             21,813           21,498
Common equivalent shares from stock options                           --               374                523              432
Number of shares used in computing per share amounts              21,857            21,925             22,336           21,930
                                                            ============      ============       ============     ============
 
Net income (loss)                                                $  (897)          $11,542            $ 3,443          $33,415
                                                            ============      ============       ============     ============
 
Net income (loss) per share                                      $ (0.04)          $  0.53            $  0.15          $  1.52
                                                            ============      ============       ============     ============
</TABLE>

                                       1
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

February 24, 2022
Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
LO: Distribution
FROM: Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at a GOES-T
Post-Launch Reception hosted by Lockheed Martin on or about
March 1, 2022

Lockheed Martin will hold a GOES-T Post-Launch Reception at Rising Tide & Table, 523
Glen Cheek Dr, Port Canaveral, FL 32920, 6:00-9:00 p.m. on or about March 1, 2022.

Approximately 300 guests have been invited to attend. Invitees include members of the
legislative branch, state and local government officials, industry representatives,
international partners, and personnel from other Federal agencies. The value of the event,
which includes all food and refreshments, will be approximately $34 per person. I find that

this event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. §
2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that free attendance at the above-mentioned event is in the interest of the
agency because it will further agency programs and operations. Attendance at this event
will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs.

Accordingly, NASA employees (subject to the exceptions noted below) who have been
invited to attend may accept free attendance for themselves and a guest to this event.

However, NASA employees whose duties may substantially affect an event sponsor, such as
by way of contracting duties, should seek an individual determination pursuant to 5 C.F.R. §
2635.204(g)(3)(i), regarding participation in this event from their local ethics counselor.
Moreover, NASA employees who are in non-career positions in which Executive Order
13989 requires signing an ethics pledge may only accept the snacks and beverages, if they
reimburse the sponsor the value of the event accepted for themselves and their guest.

Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their
individual situation.

AoA

Adam F, ZZ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, David W. Heard and David J. Peters, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of Somera Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report of Somera Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Somera Communications, Inc.



By:

/s/    DAVID W. HEARDName: David W. Heard Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Date: April 13, 2005By:

/s/    DAVID J. PETERSName: David J. Peters Title: Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer) Date: April 13, 2005
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC,  as  Trust  Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason
Tienor, Chief Executive Officer of Telkonet, Inc. (the “Company”), certify
that:





(1) The Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006
which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jason
Tienor


Jason
Tienor


Chief
Executive Officer


March 3,
2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1)

Submitted: May 22, 2024 Decided: July 16, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erscell Julius Worlds, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Attias, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7535 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Erscell Julius Worlds appeals from the denial of his motion for compassionate 

release. On appeal, Worlds asserts that the district court abused its discretion in concluding 

that changes in sentencing law could not constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason 

for release. We agree and thus vacate and remand for further proceedings.

After the district court’s ruling, we decided United States v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 

656 (4th Cir. 2024), which held that a change in sentencing law can constitute an 

extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release. This case is very similar 

to Davis. In both, the defendants were sentenced as career offenders but, thanks to a change 

in sentencing law, would not be considered career offenders if sentenced today. In both, 

the defendants sought compassionate release on the basis of this sentencing disparity. And 

the district court in Davis, like the district court here, found that this request amounted to 

an improper collateral attack and that relief, in any, needed to be sought through 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255. Davis, 99 F.4th at 656. 

On appeal in Davis, we vacated the district court’s order and remanded for further 

consideration. Davis’s claim, we held, was not an improper collateral attack, because 

Davis was not challenging the validity of his sentence. Instead, Davis was seeking 

compassionate release based on the sentencing disparity between his actual sentence and 

the sentence he would receive if resentenced today. Id. at 657. Because such a disparity, 

based on a change in sentencing law, may be grounds for compassionate release, we ruled,

the district court abused its discretion in failing to consider the argument. Id. at 658.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7535 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

Davis requires the same result here. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s 

order and remand for consideration of whether the changes in sentencing law at issue 

constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason for release in Worlds’ case. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7535 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/16/2024 Pg: 3 of 3