alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH INANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      246
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,820
<PP&E>                                           3,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,836
<SALES>                                          3,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,043
<CGS>                                              242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. EASLEY v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC.

No. 411P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 329

Petition by intervenors for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001. Conditional petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 4 October 2001.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10346

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHELLE MARIE TENGOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-178-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michelle Marie 

Tengowski has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tengowski has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10346 Document: 00512904182 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2015
No. 14-10346

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10346 Document: 00512904182 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2015
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David R. Humble, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of eDiets.com, Inc.

|        | By:    | /s/ David R. Humble                                                                             |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |                                                                                                 |
|   |   | David R. Humble Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

I, Robert T. Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of eDiets.com, Inc.

|        | By:    | /s/ Robert T. Hamilton                                                                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |                                                                                         |
|   |   | Robert T. Hamilton Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Tuesday 31st December, 1996.

Kimberly O. Janis and Thomas Janis, Appellants, against Record No. 0271-95-2 Circuit Court Nos. F94-77 and F94-78 Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.

Upon a Rehearing En Banc Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton

Charles R. Watson for appellants. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

In Janis v. Commonwealth , 22 Va. App. 646, 650-51, 472 S.E.2d 649, 651 (1996), a majority of a panel of the Court reversed and remanded the convictions of Kimberly O. Janis and Thomas Janis. A dissenting opinion was filed in the panel decision. The Commonwealth's petition for rehearing en banc was granted and heard on November 26, 1996. For the reasons stated in the panel's majority opinion, the convictions are reversed, the matters are remanded to the Circuit Court of Dinwiddie County and, accordingly, the stay of this Court's July 9, 1996 mandate is lifted. Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Coleman and Fitzpatrick would affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the original panel decision.-2- This order shall be published and certified to the trial

court.

A Copy,

Teste: Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk

By: Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of China America Holdings, Inc., SEC File No. 333-144412,
and the related prospectus, of our audit report dated March 31, 2008 with
respect to the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows of China America Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 which is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of China America Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Boca Raton, Florida
April 14, 2008
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Cargo Connection Logistics Holding, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jesse Dobrinsky,
Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: May 19, 2006


                                Cargo Connection Logistics Holding, Inc.



                                By: /s/ Jesse Dobrinsky
                                    -----------------------
                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-63034 and 333-91095) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 2002, with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.





| | /s/ | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| | --- | -----------------




San Jose, California


March 27, 2002
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2344

In re: BRANDON LEE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.

Submitted : January 18, 2018 Decided: January 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Brandon Lee, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Brandon Lee petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the Supreme Court of North Carolina to rule on his state mandamus petition . We conclude
that Lee is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). The relief sough t by Lee is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          79,015                   9,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,234                     639
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150                     100
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,816                  10,536
<PP&E>                                             568                     298
<DEPRECIATION>                                     111                      80
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,417                  14,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,575                   2,522
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                  17,469
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           158                      80
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,684                 (6,233)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,417                  14,440
<SALES>                                          2,057                   2,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,057                   2,121
<CGS>                                            1,576                     733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,350                   6,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,255                     466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,720)                 (5,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,720)                 (5,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,720)                 (5,433)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.61)                  (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)                  (0.78)


</TABLE>
*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 24, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 10-1269

v. (D. Colorado)

JOHNNY SCOTT WARREN,

Defendant - Appellant.

(D.C. No. 10-CV-01231-CMA and

1:07-CR-00354-CMA-1)

ORDER DENYING

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before KELLY, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

This is a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2255 appeal. Mr. Warren was convicted on

federal drug and firearm charges and sentenced to 240 months of imprisonment. 

His conviction was affirmed by this court on direct appeal. United States v.

Warren, 566 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2009). Mr. Warren then sought § 2255 relief,

asserting that the district court lacked jurisdiction over his criminal case because

there was no indictment or waiver of indictment and that he received ineffective

Appellate Case: 10-1269 Document: 01018483072 Date Filed: 08/24/2010 Page: 1
-2-

assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to investigate or challenge the

court’s jurisdiction. On June 8, 2010, the district court denied the § 2255 motion,

ruling that an indictment had, in fact, been filed in Mr. Warren’s criminal case. 

The court also denied Mr. Warren’s request for a certificate of appealability. Mr.

Warren now has filed an application for COA with this court. 

Appellant’s application to this court for a certificate of appealability is

DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The record supports the trial court’s

finding that an indictment was in fact filed on August 22, 2007, and reasonable

jurists would not debate the correctness of the trial court’s findings and order. 

See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 10-1269 Document: 01018483072 Date Filed: 08/24/2010 Page: 2
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS J

1ctb Court of Appeal's District

CATHY S. LUi>K, C

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

8/26/2015

RUSHING, CALVIN LOUISE Tr. Ct. No. 2012-0431

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court of appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

FILE COPY

COA No. 12-14-00112-CR

PD-0430-15

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              11,004
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      141,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,082
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   154,962
<PP&E>                                             137,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                     102,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     267,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              124,525
<BONDS>                                            139,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            16,477
<OTHER-SE>                                         (13,532)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       267,022
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   377,828
<CGS>                                              305,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      356,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8,953
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (78,754)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (68,672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (3.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                                


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Matthew Medeiros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as amended
May 16, 2005 and June 2, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of SonicWALL, Inc. Date: June 1, 2005 By:
    
    
    
    /s/ MATTHEW MEDEIROSName:
    
    
    
    Matthew MedeirosTitle:
    
    
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 I, Robert Selvi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as amended
May 16, 2005 and June 2, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SonicWALL, Inc. Date: June 1, 2005 By:
    
    
    
    /s/ ROBERT SELVIName:
    
    
    
    Robert SelviTitle:
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Mobilidad 

Aérea Avanzada

La visión de la NASA para 

Mobilidad Aérea Avanzada 

es desarrollar un sistema de 

transporte seguro,económico 

y ecológico. Este nuevo 

sistema, transportará a 

personas o paquetes en 

áreas rurales y urbanas, 

cambiando en forma 

definitiva la manera en que 

los ciudadanos de todo el 

mundo nos beneficiamos de 

la aviación.

@NASAaero

https://www.nasa.gov/aam

https://www.nasa.gov/stem
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. IRVING G. SCHLEIMER.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3902

_____________________________

KEILON JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Terrance R. Ketchel, Judge.

February 22, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Keilon Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALISON THERESA FIALA

- MULLEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 8 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.