alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Deep Space Station 14

Deep Space Network, Deep Space Station 14, a 230-foot-wide antenna at Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in Barstow, California.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/goldstone-dss14-10/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASASize1536x2048pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the First Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of Empire Financial Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick Rodgers, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Rodgers                    April 15, 2004
 -------------------                    --------------
 Patrick Rodgers                            Date
 Chief Executive Officer
mcrb-ex101_102.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1

Seres Therapeutics, Inc.

200 Sidney Street

Cambridge, MA 02139

 

 April 8, 2020

 

John G. Aunins, Ph.D.

 

Dear Dr. Aunins:

 

As discussed, set forth below are the terms of our mutual agreement regarding changes in certain terms of your employment with Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) beginning on April 1, 2020.  Reference is hereby made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between you and the Company (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”).

 

From April 1, 2020 until the earlier of (x) the termination of your employment with the Company in accordance with the Employment Agreement or (y) such time as you and the Company mutually agree (the “Reduced-Time Period”), you will perform your duties for the Company on a reduced-time basis such that, notwithstanding anything in Section 1(c) of the Employment Agreement to the contrary, you will devote approximately 50% of your ordinary working time to the business and affairs of the Company.  During the Reduced-Time Period, your Annual Base Salary (as defined in Employment Agreement) will be $192,500, subject to review and adjustment in accordance with the Employment Agreement.  Additionally, during the Reduced-Time Period, you will accrue paid personal leave in accordance with the Company’s policies (subject to Section 2(e) of the Employment Agreement).  Furthermore, the Reduced-Time Period, you will remain eligible to participate in employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements in accordance with Section 2(c) of the Employment Agreement, provided that the Company-paid portion of premiums under such plans, programs and arrangement shall be reduced to 50% of the portion paid immediately prior to the commencement of the Reduced-Time Period.  The foregoing will not provide a basis for you to resign your employment for “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement. 

 

Except as expressly set forth in this letter agreement, the Employment Agreement (including your obligations under Section 1(c) of the Employment Agreement to refrain from engaging in certain outside business activities without the consent of the Company’s Board of Directors) and the terms of your other contracts and compensatory arrangements with the Company (including your outstanding Company equity awards) remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect in accordance with and subject to their terms. 

 

This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by returning a countersigned copy of this letter to me.  

 

Sincerely,

Seres Therapeutics, Inc.

 


	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Eric Shaff

	
Name:
	
 
	
Eric Shaff

	
Title:
	
 
	
President & CEO




 

 


	
Accepted and agreed:

	
 

	
/s/ John Aunins

	
John G. Aunins, Ph.D.




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US-DOCS\114823351.2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


WRITTEN  STATEMENT  OF  THE  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER

     Solely  for  the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  I,  Don  Sproat, the
undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial Officer of Telzuit
Medical  Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify,  based  on  my
knowledge,  that  the  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
ended  June  30,  2005  (the "Report") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof:

1.     Fully  complies  with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     That  the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Don  Sproat
----------------
Don  Sproat
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
October  31,  2005

<PAGE>
#### Jackson *v.*Goodtitle, on the Demise of Bromley.—In error.

*Friday, May*31.

THE copy of a declaration in ejectment, with a notice requiring an appearance at the term next after that which followed the time when the notice issued, was served on the tenant in possession. Held, that the notice was illegal.

Judgment in such action cannot be rendered against the casual ejector, until after the tenant in possession has made default. R. S. 1838, p. 260.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date: November              7, 2007 |   |                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |                                                                      |
|                                     |   |                                                                      |
|                                     |   |  /s/              Craig L.              Levra         |
|                                          |   | Chairman              of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                                     |   |                                                                      |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                 |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | /s/              Howard K.              Kaminsky                                      |
|        |   | Executive                Vice President-Finance,Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |

----
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Silicon South, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Brian L. Hauff, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. By: /s/ Brian L. Hauff, CEO Date: May 16, 2011
Office of the NASA Chief Scientist

PECASE

Information/Requirements

Selection Criteria

• Performance of innovative research at the frontiers of science, engineering, and 

technology relevant to the mission of the sponsoring organization or agency.

• Commitment to community service, as demonstrated through scientific leadership, 

education, community outreach or public engagement.

Eligibility Requirements: 

• Awardees must be US citizens, nationalsi, or permanent residents;

• Awardees may only receive one PECASE award;

• Awardees must be in good standing with his/her employer; 

• Nominees must be conducting NASA-sponsored research in science, engineering, or 

technology development at NASA centers, universities, colleges or elsewhere.

• At the time of nomination to OSTP, the nominee must be in the beginning of his or her 

independent research career, which is generally defined as either: 

a. in the first five years since receiving his or her first competitively awarded federal 

research funding (as principal investigator), 

 Excludes funds secured during graduate school or postdoctoral 

training/fellowship and funds secured for training, fellowship, education, 

or career development.

 Excludes NASA center internal awards

b. in the first five years of a tenure-track or equivalent academic or federal research 

position. 

 Since finishing graduate school or postdoctoral training/fellowship.

The total time since finishing graduate school (receiving highest degree) must be less than 10 

years.

Exceptions to these guidelines may be granted, if merited by a particular field or 

individual circumstance: a written explanation must be provided for an exception that 

makes a clear case that the nominee is effectively in the early stages of his or her career. 

Selection of Candidates:

• NASA HQ organizations will submit candidates to the Office of Chief Scientist

• Candidates will be reviewed and selected by a senior level NASA-wide panel, established 

by the Office of Chief Scientist.
Office of the NASA Chief Scientist

• For purposes of PECASE, traditionally underrepresented groups in science and 

engineering are defined to be women, Asian American, Pacific Islander, Hispanic, 

African American, American Indian, or Alaska Natives.

• Final selection is made by the White House.

Guidelines for funding:

• Currently, funding for each awardee must be provided by the nominating organization-

-there is no central funding for PECASE awards. The specific form of the award will 

be determined by the nominating organization, but should be equivalent to a $200K 

grant; e.g. a grant of $50K/year for 4 years.

i The term "nationals" refers to native residents of a possession of the United States such as American Samoa.
#### Harper and Others *v.*The State, on the Relation of the Board of Commissioners of Knox county.

*Tuesday, January*23, 1844.

If after the execution of a bond by several persons, it be altered by inserting in the body of it the names of others as co-obligors, and by adding their signatures to it, and the circumstances under which the alteration was made be not explained by the obligee, the bond will be considered void as to the first obligors.

A suit on the bond against all the obligors cannot, in such case, be sustained.

ERROR to the *Knox*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This was an action of debt brought by the state, on the' relation of the board of commissioners of *Knox*county, against *Jacob Harper, Martin Robinson, John*Collins, *Isaac Coons, Jonathan P. Cox, George*Calhound, and *John Weaver.*The suit is founded on a joint and. several bond, executed by the defendants and one *John K.*Kurtz, whom the defendants had survived, in the penalty of 4,000 dollars, conditioned for the faithful discharge, by *Harper, oí*certain duties, &c. Two of the defendants, *Robinson*and *Collins,*pleaded *non est factum,*upon which issue was joined. There were issues on other pleas which it is not necessary to notice. One of the pleas was demurred to and the demurrer correctly sustained. The cause was submitted to the Court, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff.

On the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence the bond- declared on, and introduced a subscribing witness who stated that, on, &c., the bond was executed by *Harper, Kurtz, Robinson,*and *Collins;*that two years'after-such execution of the bond, the saíne was altered by inserting the names of the other defendants as co-obligors in the bond, and by adding their signatures to it; and that he, the witness, was not aware that *Robinson*and *Collins*assented to the alteration. The defendants, thereupon, objected to the bond as evidence, but the objection was overruled.

We think the bond, according to the facts proved, could not be considered valid as to the defendants who pleaded *non est factum.*It appears that two years after the defendants. who- so pleaded had executed the bond, it was altered in a material part by its being executed by several other persons, and by the insertion of their names in the body of it; *62an¿ there was no evidence that the alteration was made with the consent of the two defendants who had previously executed it, and who pleaded *non est factum.*In the absence of explanatory evidence, the alteration, made after the said two defendants had executed the bond, must *be*presumed to have been made with the assent of the relator, and without the assent of those two obligors. The consequence is, that the bond was void as to two of the obligors, and that the suit against them and the other defendants, founded on the bond, ought not to have been sustained.

*J.*Law, for the plaintiffs.

*S.*Judah, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed at the costs of the relator. Cause remanded, &c.
No. 15,490.

#### Ross *v.*Donaldson, Sheriff, et al.

Sheriff’s *Sale.*— Holder *of Certificate.*— Possession.—Injunction.—The holder of a sheriff’s certificate is not entitled to possession until one year from the date of its issue, and hence such holder, the year for redemption not having expired, is not entitled to maintain an action for injunction to restrain the execution by the sheriff of a writ of possession in favor of another person.

From the Cass Circuit Court.

*G. E. Ross,*for appellant.

*D. P. Baldwin,*for appellees.

Berkshire, J.

The complaint was for an injunction. The appellees filed demurrers to the complaint, which the court sustained, and the appellant excepted, and the appellant hav*239ing refused to file an amended complaint the court rendered judgment against him for want of a complaint.

Filed April 10, 1890.

The complaint starts out by alleging that the appellant is the owner of the real estate, and entitled to the possession, and further alleges that he is in possession by his tenants, and that the appellee Donaldson holds an execution or writ of possession in favor of his co-appellee, and is threatening to eject the appellant’s said tenants from said property by virtue of said writ, and will do so unless enjoined therefrom.

But the complaint goes on to allege the facts upon which the appellant’s claim of ownership and his right to the possession depended, from which it appears that the title to the said real estate is in the said Henry J. Banta, and that the appellant holds a sheriff’s certificate entitling him to a deed for said property in case there is no redemption from the sale recited in said certificate.

The sale was made and the certificate issued September 28th, 1889, and the appellant will not be entitled to a deed for one year from that date, and until he gets a deed he is not entitled to the possession. Section 767, R. S. 1881; *Johnson*v. *Briscoe,*92 Ind. 367.

The pleading must be construed as a whole, and when so construed it appearing therefrom that the appellant is not the owner of the real estate, and not entitled to the possession, it is bad though it be conceded that some of the averments therein contained if they stood alone would state a good cause of action. *Keepfer*v. *Force,*86 Ind. 81; *Ragsdale*v. *Mitchell,*97 Ind. 458, and cases cited.

It does not become necessary to pass upon the other questions discussed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, and the temporary injunction dissolved.

The clerk of this court will issue the proper mandate.
<PAGE>




                                  Transfer Agreement

     This Agreement is made this 29th made of December, 1998, by and between
Rackspace, Ltd. (the "Partnership") and Richard Yoo ("Yoo"), Dirk
Elmendorf ("Elmendorf") and Pat Condon ("Condon").

     In consideration for the substantial benefits to be received by Yoo,
Elmendorf and Condon incident to the creation of the Partnership, and to
ensure that the Partnership receives all intellectual property relating to the
business conducted by Cymitar Technology Group, Inc. ("Cymitar"), the parties
agree as follows:

     Yoo, Condon and Elmendorf hereby transfer and assign to the Partnership
any and all tradesecrets, rights, inventions, trade marks, copyrights and any
other intellectual property rights whatsoever they may own or have an interest
in which relates to the business conducted by Cymitar at any time previous to
the date of this Agreement or which relate to the Concept as such term is
defined in the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rackspace, Ltd., except for
the tradesecrets, rights, inventions, trade marks, copyrights and other
intellectual property rights being transferred to Elmendorf pursuant to the
agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.


/s/ Richard Yoo               /s/ Pat Condon
---------------------         ----------------------
Richard Yoo                   Pat Condon


/s/ Dirk Elmendorf            Rackspace, Ltd.
---------------------
Dirk Elmendorf                  By: Macroweb, LC

                                   By: /s/ Morris Miller
                                       --------------------

                                   Its: member
                                       --------------------
**Exhibit 10.3.30****Amendment to Employment Agreement of Gregory T.Novak**     On May 24, 2005, the following adjustments were approved bythe Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of HarrisInteractive Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to theEmployment Agreement by and between the Company and Gregory T.Novak, dated as of April 1, 2004 and amended as ofJanuary 1, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”),which adjustments were made effective as of May 23, 2005: •      Base Compensation — Mr. Novak’s Base    Compensation, as defined in Section 3.1 of the Employment    Agreement, was increased from $368,000 to $425,000.  •      Target Bonus — Mr. Novak’s target bonus, as    provided for under Section 3.2 of the Employment Agreement,    for fiscal years 2005 and 2006 was increased from $150,000 to    $200,000.  •      On September 7, 2005 the Board of Directors changed Mr.    Novak’s title to President and Chief Executive Officer.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/  Matthew T. PullamMatthew T. PullamExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Decision To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
From Clinton Engineering Works in Oak Ridge, TN, To Be Included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision 
to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from Clinton 
Engineering Works in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to be included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for 
the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the 
evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: Clinton Engineering Works.
    Location: Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All guards and service workers who 
worked in or around the warehouses at the Elza Gate area.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1943 through May 18, 1947.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can 
also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9edeae8fae9eaedea87eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0a4a3a1b3a0a3a4a3cea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-27597 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>