alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. F. Luke et al. *v.*Wm. Gunnell et al.

Sale of Wife's Land.

The sale of the wife’s land to the husband’s father and the reconveyance by the father to the husband did not vest the wife’s title in husband, as there was no consideration for the sale.

Same — Bona Fide Purchaser.

The subsequent conveyance of the land by the husband and wife was by fraud and coercion, yet as Johnson was a *dona fide*purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice the appellants, since her death, cannot reclaim title.

Same — Equity.

The appellants are equitably entitled to recover from appellee their interest in the amount paid to him for the land.

APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

October 1, 1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson;

It does not appear that the conveyance of the land of the appellee’s wife to his father was either for any valuable consideration or so acknowledged by her as to pass her title, and, consequently, his father’s reconveyance to him does not seem to have vested her title in him. But, although it is quite apparent that the subsequent conveyance of the land to Johnson by the appellee and his wife was, so far as she was concerned, superinduced by fraud and virtual coercion, yet, as Johnson was apparently a *bona fide*purchaser for a valuable consideration' without notice, the appellants cannot, by her representatives, since her death, reclaim the title.

But the appellants are equitably entitled to recover from the appellee their distributable interest in the amount paid to him for the land by Johnson. He has failed to show that the sale to Johnson was made to reimburse money alleged to have been advapeed to the use of the appellants and their mother. No such advance has been satisfactorily established; and if any had been made, we *259might reasonably presume that it had been refunded by the appellee’s sale of two other smaller tracts of land and by hi orris’ note for about $1,100, payable to his deceased wife as guardian.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing the petition of the appellants is reversed, and the cause remanded for a judgment in their favor against the appellee as herein before indicated, with legal interest, from the time of payment by Johnson.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.31


                            SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                            -----------------------


$100,000.00                                                 Bellevue, Washington
                                                                December 2, 1999


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Kelly R. Jorgensen ("Borrower") promises to pay to
                                              --------
Pointshare Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), the principal
                                                     -------
sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal hereof from the date hereof at the rate of 6.0% per annum,
compounded annually.

     All principal and accrued interest (if any) shall be due and payable in
full on the earliest of (a) November 30, 2001, (b) in the event of any default
under the Loan Agreement (as defined below) or (c) the date of any sale,
conveyance, assignment, alienation or any other form of transfer of the Stock
(as defined below). Payments of principal and interest shall be made in lawful
money of the United States of America and shall be credited first to the accrued
interest, with the remainder applied to principal.

     Borrower may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal or
interest owing hereunder.

     This Note is subject to the terms of a Secured Loan Agreement, dated as of
December 2, 1999 by and between the Company and Borrower (the "Loan Agreement")
                                                               --------------
and is subject to all the provisions thereof, and is secured by a pledge of
Common Stock of the Company under the terms of a Security Agreement dated
December 2, 1999 (the "Security Agreement") and is subject to all the
                       ------------------
provisions thereof.

     Should any action be instituted for the collection of this Note, the
reasonable costs and attorneys' fees therein of the holder shall be paid by
Borrower.

     The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against Borrower, and
shall not be required to proceed against the collateral securing this Note in
the event of default.


                                    /s/ Kelly R. Jorgensen
                                    ----------------------
                                        Kelly R. Jorgensen
No. 14,397.

#### Brotherton *v.*Street et al.

Promissory *Note.*— Endorsement.—Complaint.—The payee of a promissory note wrote upon the back thereof the words: “ I sign this note to N. H. Garretson without recourse,” and affixed his signature. Garretson wrote upon the back of the note these words: “ I guarantee payment of this note when due to J.ohn F. Brotherton,” his signature following the words, and Brotherton wrote thereon the words: *“*I guarantee payment of this note when due to the First National Bank of Lima, Ohio,” and attached his signature.

*Held,*that the endorsement by the payee, notwithstanding the misuse of words, was sufficient to pass title to Garretson.

*Held,*also, that a complaint by Brotherton alleging the facts as above is bad, as it does not show title in the plaintiff.

From the Jay Circuit Court.

*D. T. Taylor, R. H. Hartford, J. B. Jaqua*and *J. A. Jaqua,*for appellant.

*C. Corwin*and *J. M. Smith,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

The complaint of the appellant is founded upon a promissory note, negotiable by the law merchant, executed by the appellees, and payable to Thomas J. McElroy. It is alleged that McElroy wrote on the back of the note these words: “ I sign this note to N. H. Garretson, without recourse,” and that he affixed his signature. We think this was such an endorsement of the note as passed title to Garretson, although there is a plain misuse of words, for the intent to vest title in Garretson is clear, and this intent it is the duty of the courts to carry into effect. It is further alleged that Garretson wrote on the back of the' note the words : *“*I guarantee payment of this note when due to John F. Brotherton,” and that his signature follows the words. It is also alleged that Brotherton wrote on the.baek of the note the words : “I guarantee payment of this note when due to the First National Bank of Lima, Ohio,” and that he attached his signature to what he had written.

*600Filed June 26, 1890;

petition for a rehearing overruled Sept. 18, 1890.

If the writing on the back of the note signed by Garret-son did not transfer title, then Brotherton acquired none, and can not maintain this action. If the writing was sufficient to transfer title, then the writing signed by Brotherton transferred title to the First National Bank, of Lima, and no title appears in the appellant, since it does not appear that the bank ever parted with the title to Brotherton, or to any one else. Whatever view, therefore, is taken of the complaint it is bad, for the reason that it does not show title in the plaintiff, and without title he can have no right of action. As the appellant has no complaint upon which a judgment can rest, it is unnecessary to pass upo'U ^'fi sufficiency of the answers.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6902

TYRONE SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-3815-DKC)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Corcoran, No. CA-98-

3815-DKC (D. Md. June 4, 1999). Furthermore, we deny Appellant’s

motions to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, for appointment of

counsel, and to be furnished transcripts at government expense. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# American Heart Month, 2010

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Its victims are women and men, and people of all backgrounds and ethnicities, in all regions of our country. Although heart disease is one of our Nation’s most costly and widespread health problems, it is among the most preventable. During American Heart Month, we rededicate ourselves to fighting this disease by improving our own heart-healthy habits, and by raising awareness in our homes and our communities.

Protecting our families from heart disease requires each of us to take responsibility for our health and that of our children—including exercising regularly, maintaining a healthy diet, avoiding tobacco, and raising our children to spend more time playing outside. Because obesity is a leading risk factor for heart disease, good nutrition and physical activity are crucial for all our families.

This month, we honor the health-care professionals, researchers, and heart health ambassadors who save lives and spare suffering. Every day, these dedicated individuals put themselves on the front lines of our fight against heart disease. To better equip them, my Administration is investing in cutting-edge research, such as a large DNA sequencing study funded by the National Institutes of Health which could unlock earlier treatment options for high-risk individuals.

                    The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute is sponsoring                     *The Heart Truth*                    campaign, which reminds women of their risk for heart disease and empowers them to reduce it. On Friday, February 5, Michelle and I encourage all Americans to recognize the campaign’s National Wear Red Day by wearing red or the campaign’s Red Dress Pin to support women’s heart disease awareness and remind all women about their risk for heart disease.                

In acknowledgement of the importance of the ongoing fight against cardiovascular disease, the Congress, by Joint Resolution approved December 30, 1963, as amended (77 Stat. 843; 36 U.S.C. 101), has requested that the President issue an annual proclamation designating February as “American Heart Month.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim February 2010 as American Heart Month, and I invite all Americans to participate in National Wear Red Day on February 5, 2010. I also invite the Governors of the States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, officials of other areas subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and the American people to join me in recognizing and reaffirming our commitment to fighting cardiovascular disease.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 2010-2743

Billing code 3195-W0-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Donald A. Wojnowski Jr., Principal Executive Officer of Empire
Financial Holding Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
   information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the period covered by this report and based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
   internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
   business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
   reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting.

Date: January 24, 2007

/s/ Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
---------------------------
Donald A. Wojnowski Jr.
Principal Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher M. Gleeson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|  
(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 
 
 
(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
/s/   CHRISTOPHER M. GLEESON

 
 
 
  
**Christopher M. Gleeson Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2002**

  
This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

23 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         547,988
<SECURITIES>                                   885,984
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,688,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,900
<INVENTORY>                                  3,844,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,214,773
<PP&E>                                       4,641,774
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,730,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,742,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,763,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,269
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,412,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,742,265
<SALES>                                      3,154,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,154,560
<CGS>                                        1,939,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,075,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28124]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-80-001]

CenterPoint Energy--Illinois Gas Transmission Company; Notice of 
Baseline Filing

November 1, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 28, 2010, CenterPoint Energy--Illinois 
Gas Transmission Company submitted a revised baseline filing of its 
Statement of Operating Conditions for services provided under section 
311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28124 Filed 11-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Harris Interactive Inc.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated July 27, 2001 appearing in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of
Harris Interactive Inc. (which report and consolidated financial statements are
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an
audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form
10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction
with the related consolidated financial statements.

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Rochester, New York
July 27, 2001
SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE

From Our Town to the Moon, Mars, and 

Beyond

Karly Pitman 

3/01/21 - 2/28/25

From Our Town to the Moon, Mars, and Beyond is 

partnering with public libraries to help inform, engage, 

and inspire new and underserved public audiences. 

The project is run from the Space Science Institute, 

with evaluation through EDC, and support from the 

Johnson Space Flight Center Astromaterials group. The 

primary project goals of the project are to increase 

youth and adult patrons’ interest in and engagement 

with NASA’s Moon/Mars program, its contributions to 

STEM disciplines, and related STEM careers; build the 

capacity of public libraries nationwide to utilize NASA 

resources and deliver inspirational NASA-based STEM 

learning experiences to their communities; create 

innovative collaborations between project team 

members, NASA mission partners, and public libraries, 

to provide sustained STEM programming for youth and 

adults; and effectively reach underserved and 

underrepresented library populations in their 

communities. In 2023, the exhibit continued its national 

tour, traveling to libraries in Arizona, Iowa, New 

Hampshire, New York, and Connecticut.

List of Partners:

• Johnson Space Center

• National Center for Interactive Learning 

• STAR Net National Library Network

Visitors explore a jigsaw puzzle touch table, one 

of several low-barrier-to-entry components in the 

exhibit.

Credits: Space Science Institute

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC21M0081, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov