alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 184

To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding 

the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2003

Mr. DODD (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, and Mr. DAYTON) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965 regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL PELL GRANT MAXIMUM AMOUNT. 

4 Section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 

5 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(2)) is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub7 paragraph (C); 

8 (2) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 

9 follows: 
2

•S 184 IS 

1 ‘‘(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 

2 amount of the Federal Pell Grant for a student eligible 

3 under this part shall be—

4 ‘‘(i) $6,700 for academic year 2004–2005; 

5 ‘‘(ii) $7,600 for academic year 2005–2006; 

6 ‘‘(iii) $8,600 for academic year 2006–2007; 

7 ‘‘(iv) $9,600 for academic year 2007–2008; 

8 ‘‘(v) $10,600 for academic year 2008–2009; 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(vi) $11,600 for academic year 2009–2010, 

11 less an amount equal to the amount determined to be the 

12 expected family contribution with respect to that student 

13 for that year.’’; and 

14 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) (as so 

15 amended) the following: 

16 ‘‘(B) If the Secretary determines that the increase 

17 from one academic year to the next in the amount of the 

18 maximum Federal Pell Grant authorized under subpara19 graph (A) does not increase students’ purchasing power 

20 (relative to the cost of attendance at an institution of high21 er education) by at least 5 percentage points, then the 

22 amount of the maximum Federal Pell Grant authorized 

23 under subparagraph (A) for the academic year for which 
3

•S 184 IS 

1 the determination is made shall be increased by an amount 

2 sufficient to achieve such a 5 percentage point increase.’’.

Æ
Aerodynamic Truck Studies

During a decade spanning the 1970s and 

1980s, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, now NASA Armstrong, researchers conducted tests to determine the extent to which 

adjustments in the shape of trucks reduced 

aerodynamic drag and improved efficiency. 

The techniques honed in the investigation of 

truck aerodynamics proved highly applicable. 

Felt tufts, or strings, were fitted to the 

vehicle's sides to show airflow. The investigators concluded that rounding the vertical 

corners, front and rear, reduced drag by 40 

percent, yet decreased the vehicle's internal 

volume by only 1.3 percent. Rounding both 

the vertical and horizontal corners cut drag 

by 54 percent, while losing only three percent 

of internal volume. 

The first phase involved a cab-over tractortrailer, modified by rounding all of its front 

corners and edges. In addition, technicians attached sheet metal fairings over the cab's roof 

and sides as far back as the trailer. This covering closed the open space between the cab 

and trailer. During the phase one research, 

researchers found that in highway driving at 

55 miles per hour, rounding the corners and 

fairing the space to close the gap between the 

truck's cab and trailer resulted in a significant 

reduction in aerodynamic drag and in 20 to 

25 percent lower fuel consumption than the 

standard vehicle. The improvements soon 

spurred design changes in production trucks. 

The second phase conducted on the modified 

passenger van entailed such modifications as 

This photograph illustrates a standard passenger van modified at the Dryden Flight Research Center to 

investigate the aerodynamics of trucks. The resulting vehicle, modified with sheet metal, resembled a 

motor home, with rounded vertical corners on the vehicle's front and rear sections. For subsequent tests, 

researchers installed a "boat tail" structure, shown in the photograph. (NASA photo) 
FS-2015-05-100 AFRC

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Armstrong Flight Research Center

P.O. Box 273

Edwards, California 93523

NASA Facts

rounding the vertical and horizontal corners, as well as 

adding a "boat tail" structure to the rear of the vehicle 

and a faired underbody. The modified van, with rounded 

vertical corners front and back, experienced 40 percent less drag than the standard configuration. With the 

rounding of horizontal corners as well, drag reduction 

rose to 54 percent. Further testing included the addition 

of a faired underbody and a boat tail, the latter feature 

resulting in an additional drag reduction of about 15 

percent.

Based on the research conducted at NASA Dryden, 

many truck manufacturers subsequently incorporated 

similar improvements and design modifications in their 

production trucks.

Application of aerodynamic design principles to the design of large truck cabs by NASA Dryden researchers in the mid-1970s led 

to the adoption of those standards by most manufacturers of large trucks on the road today. (NASA Photo)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66384-66385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-14]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year 2010 Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency 
Program

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and 
other requirements for HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Housing Choice 
Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency (HCV FSS) Program. The HCV FSS NOFA 
makes available approximately $60 million under the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act 2010. The purpose of the HCV FSS program is to 
promote the development of local strategies to coordinate the use of 
assistance under the HCV program with public and private resources to 
enable participating families to increase earned income and financial 
literacy, reduce or eliminate the need for welfare assistance, and make 
progress toward economic independence and self-sufficiency.

[[Page 66385]]

    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the HCV-FSS Program is 14.871. 
Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Program staff will not be available to provide guidance 
on how to prepare the application. Questions regarding the 2010 General 
Section should be directed to the Office of Grants Management and 
Oversight at (202) 708-0667 or the NOFA Information Center at 800-HUD-
8929 (toll free). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access 
these numbers via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service 
at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: October 22, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27307 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2018 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2018

 To amend the National Trails System Act to extend the Lewis and Clark 
National Historic Trail to include additional sites associated with the 
 preparation or return phase of the expedition, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2004

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to extend the Lewis and Clark 
National Historic Trail to include additional sites associated with the 
 preparation or return phase of the expedition, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Lewis and Clark National Historic 
Trail Extension Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF LEWIS AND CLARK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.

     Section 5(a)(6) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(6)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``The'' and 
        inserting ``(A) The''; and
            (2) by adding the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) In addition to the route designated in subparagraph (A), the 
trail shall be extended to include the route followed by Meriwether 
Lewis and William Clark, whether independently or together, in the 
preparation phase of the expedition starting at Monticello, located 
near Charlottesville, Virginia, and traveling to Wood River, Illinois, 
and in the return phase of the expedition from Saint Louis, Missouri, 
to Washington, DC. The extended route shall include designated Lewis 
and Clark sites in Virginia, the District of Columbia, Maryland, 
Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, 
Indiana, and Illinois. The Secretary shall complete a suitability and 
feasibility study to include the extended route within three years from 
the date funds are first made available for that purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

KEITH RUSSELL JUDD,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v. 

GARY K. KING, Attorney General for

the State of New Mexico,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-2013

(D.C. No.1:08-CV-01084-MCA-DJS)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2013 Document: 01018363505 Date Filed: 02/09/2010 Page: 1
#### Dale Owen DUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cal A. TERHUNE; et al., DefendantsAppellees.

No. 02-16126.

D.C. No. CV-01-00426-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2003.

Dale Owen Dustin, pro se, Corcoran, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert Allen Crown, Attorney General’s Office of State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Dale Owen Dustin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison officials alleging excessive force, assault, and inadequate medical care. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with court orders, *Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,*191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm.

In dismissing Dustin’s original complaint, the district court gave Dustin notice of the deficiencies and ordered him to amend his complaint to comply with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dustin’s request for a fourth extension of time to file an amended complaint because Dustin had previously been granted three extensions, and each time was advised that failure to timely file would result in dismissal. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); *Yourish,*191 F.3d at 990.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

d0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

143059

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143059 COA: 298033 Calhoun CC: 2 009-003955-FC REGINALD WALLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 15, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
****

## Jonathan Cantin

Jonathan's father, René, writes : "Jonathan was born on July 3rd, 1982. As a small boy, he practiced swimming and hockey, and he played competitive hockey from the young age of 6 thru till he was 21. After graduating from high school, he went to technical school in aircraft assembling which landed him at Bombardier Aerospace. As a teenager, Jonathan shared my passion of flying light planes and as a co-pilot, Jonathan has many hours under his belt. Computers, photography ,and video editing are hobbies Jonathan enjoys. Also, he never put away sport: he is an on-ice hockey official in the Québec Major Junior Hockey League .Today, Jonathan works as a mechanical designer."

March 2008

**Jonathan and René Cantin**
J ohns appea led his c onviction to this Court in 1999. Se e J oh ns v . S tate , No. 03-99-00731- 1 CR, 2000 Tex . App. L EXI S 4601 (Tex. App.—Aust in J uly 13, 2000, no pet.) (not de signated for pu bli c a tio n) . H e ha s a lso pr e vio us ly fi le d a pe tit ion fo r m and amus se e kin g to o ve rt ur n h is conviction
. See I

n re Johns , No. 03-09-00365- CV, 2009 Tex. App. L EXI S 5367 (Tex. App.—Austin J uly

8, 2009) (or ig. pr ocee ding) (not desig nated f or publication). 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 9 -00 700 -CV

In r e He nr y Le e Jo hns

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS COUNTY
M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
He nr y L e e John s, a

pp e ari ng pr o se, ha s f

ile d a pe tit ion fo r wri t of

mand amus . In th is pe ti ti o n , Jo h n s r a is e s a

nu mb e r o f is s u e s c h a ll e n g in g h is 1 9 9 9 c r im in a l c o n v ic ti o nf o r a g g r av ated assault with a dea dly

wea pon. See Tex. P enal Code Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2008). 1 An int e rm e diate c ourt

of a pp e a ls h a s n o ju

ri sd ict ion ov e r p os t- c onvic tio n w ri ts of habe as cor

pus in felony

case s. See E

x parte Martinez , 175 S.W .3d 510, 512-13 (T e x. Ap p. —T e xar

ka na 20 05 , o ri g . p ro c e e din g ); Se lf v . S tate , 1 2 2 S
. W
. 3 d 294, 294-95 (T e x. Ap p. —E a stl and

20 03 , no pe t.) ; see also Tex. Code Crim. P roc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2008) (post-conviction applications fo r wr it s o f h a beas c orpus, for f

elony case s in which de a th p e na lty

wa s n ot a sse sse d, mus t be fi le d in c ourt of or ig ina l c onvic tio n a

nd ma de re tur

na ble to the cour t of criminal appe als). The court o f cr i m i n al appe als has re cog nized that “the exclusive2

post-conviction re medy

in final felony

convictions in Texas courts is throug h a wr it of habea s corpus pursuant to [article] 11.07.” Ol iv o v . S tate , 918 S.W .2d 519, 5 2 5 n . 8 (T ex . Crim. App. 1996) (quoting Cha rle

s v . S tate , 809 S.W .2d 574, 576 (Tex. A pp.—San Antonio 1991, no pe t.)). We ar e
a lso no t a uth or ize d und e r s e c tio n 2 2. 22 1 o f t he g ov e rnme nt c od e to c on sid e r a n o ri g ina l, p os tconviction application for writ of ha beas c orpus. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (desc ribing writ power

of intermediate cour

ts of appea ls). Be cause we have no jurisdiction over what is in effe ct a po s t -c o n v i ction habea s
c or pu s p ro c e e din g , w e dis mis s r e lator ’s pe tit ion fo r wri t of

mand amus .

___________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Waldrop and He nson Filed: De cembe r 18, 2009
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

January 25, 2005
#### In re Floyd Junior “Dick” POWELL, Petitioner.

No. 03-7094.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Floyd Junior Powell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Floyd Junior “Dick” Powell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his habeas motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue *285delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1718 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1718

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JAMES B. PEARSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Senator James B. Pearson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator 
James B. Pearson Post Office.

            Passed the Senate October 29, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1718

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.
```
**Exhibit 10.39****Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Issuer Repurchase Plan Agreement**This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Issuer Repurchase PlanAgreement between SonicWALL, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”) and RBC Dain RauscherInc. (the “Broker”) (the “Amended and Restated Agreement”) is entered into this 3rd day of November2006. The purpose of this Amendment is to modify certain provisions of the Amended and RestatedAgreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to themin the Amended and Restated Agreement.**Recitals**The Company previously established the Amended and Restated Agreement to repurchase shares of itscommon stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Stock”) in compliance with Rule 10b-18 (“Rule 10b-18”)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).The Board of Directors of the Company, at its regular meeting held on February 7, 2006,authorized an increase in the aggregate amount of purchases pursuant to this Amended and RestatedAgreement and further authorized an extension of the term of the Amended and Restated Agreement;The Company desires to continue its engagement of the Broker to effect repurchases of shares of theStock in accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement, as modified by this Amendment.**Agreement**Therefore, the Company and the Broker hereby agree to modify the Amended and Restated Agreement asfollows: 1. In Section 2(e), DELETE the language “(e) the date that the aggregate amount ofpurchases pursuant to this Agreement reaches Seventy Five Million Dollars ($75,000,000)          ”and in lieu thereof INSERT the following, “(e) the date that the aggregate amount ofpurchases pursuant to this Amended and Restated Agreement reaches One Hundred MillionDollars ($100,000,000)          ”  2. In Section 2(g), DELETE the language “(g) Two (2) years after the public announcementby Company that its Board of Directors had approved an Issuer Repurchase Plan          ” and inlieu thereof INSERT the following, “(g) Three (3) years after the public announcement byCompany that its Board of Directors had approved an Issuer Repurchase Plan          ”  3. The Company represents that it is aware of no material nonpublic information regardingthe Company or any of its securities (including the Stock) as of the date hereof.  4. Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, the Amended and Restated Agreementremains in full force and effect.
 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed this Amendment as of the date first written above.             SonicWALL, Inc.               By /s/ Frederick M. Gonzalez                         Its: Vice President,General Counsel & Corporate Secretary           RBC Dain Rauscher Inc.           By /s/ Andrew Jones                         Its: VP - Corporate & Executive Services