View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/001.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:04 AM]

Technical Representative: Cierchacki, Irene-TR

Task Number: NNC06E001T - 13

Task Title: ED MIO Web Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The performance of this task order will provide information technology, resource

management, and configuration management support to the Management Integration

Office (MIO) of the Engineering Directorate (ED).

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

NASA requires contractor support to provide the necessary personnel and materials to

develop, maintain and update the GESS2 Contract Management System (CMS), including

electronic submission of Contract Task Requests, evaluation criteria, periodic

amendments to the Statements of Work, task responses. and configuration management

of the CMS, ***with minimal support on the funding application.*** NASA will require

various data from these systems relative to programmatic, management, and

performance reports on a mandatory or adhoc bases.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Subtask 1: GESS2 Contract Management Systems (CMS) Support:

The contractor shall support, maintain and update the web-based GESS2 CMS used by

the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR), Technical Representatives

(TR) and Contracting Officer (CO) for the Glenn Engineering and Scientific Support 2

(GESS2) Contract for the processing of task orders

Additionally, the Contractor shall:

*support a CMS Help Desk

*provide and support training of GESS-2 government and contractor personnel relative

to input and processing of actions within CMS. 

* provide adhoc and mandatory reports.

*be responsible for the monthly reconciliation of ATOMS/CMS. 

*acquire and deliver to the government all unique equipment necessary to house and

operate CMS, other sites in support of ED, hardware sufficient to permit simultaneous

programming and software viewing functions, and various equipment approved by the

NASA TR, considered necessary to the efficient performance of work under this task

*support and comply with IT Sercurity requests and updates

*funding application
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/001.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:04 AM]

Subtask 2: RESERVED

Subtask 3: Configuration Management CMS

The contractor shall provide Configuration Management support of the CMS.

The contractor shall work toward providing an automated configuration management

process, assign Configuration Items, setup a status accounting systems, and update the

Configuration Management Plans as necessary. 

The contractor shall jointly develop a schedule with the COTR on changes and due dates

of approved CMS changes.

The contractor shall refer to the GESS-2-CMS PLAN-001, “Glenn Engineering and

Scientific Support (GESS-2) Contract Management System (CMS) Configuration

Management Plan (CMP)”.

Subtask 4: RESERVED

Subtask 5: Training & Travel

The contractor shall propose training requirements as necessary , to ensure personnel

are up-to-date on current programming version and skills to support the task

requirement.

The contractor shall use judgment in requesting training. The contractor shall ensure

that local training is not available prior to requesting training/travel.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones and Deliverables 

Entire Task

Monthly Technical progress report.

The contractor shall submit to and brief the COTR monthly on technical progress and

finances, This shall , include open risks, mitigation activities, hours associated by each

subtask proposed activities for the following month, and notification of a cost variance

that exceeds 5 percent of estimated cost during the award fee period.

Subtask 1:

Provide Award Fee Period reports and other ad hoc reports as needed by the COTR and

TR. 

Subtask 3:

Schedule Configuration Management Change Board Meetings for CMS at a minimum

quarterly, maximum monthly.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/001.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:04 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 20

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor shall provide personnel who has a skill and knowledge base to support

the requirements of this task

Government Furnished Property

The following servers will be provided and maintained by NASA:

-Amicus (sandbox)

-Amicus1 (shared server) 

-GRGESS (production)

-GRGESS DEV (test server)

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/003.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:05 AM]

Technical Representative: Envia, Edmane

Task Number: NNC06E003T - 12

Task Title: Propulsion System Aeroacoustic Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 5.

BACKGROUND: 

The Acoustics Branch conducts research aimed at understanding and mitigating aircraft

engine noise. Experimental and analytical methods are used to improve the

understanding of the fundamental aspects of noise generation mechanism in aircraft

engines. Knowledge gained from such research is used to develop noise reduction

technologies for aircraft propulsion systems. In this task, research is directed toward fan

noise diagnostic and jet noise diagnostic & modeling. Model scale fan and jet systems

are acoustically evaluated using rig tests in wind tunnel or other facilities by employing

suitable diagnostics techniques. Computer codes to predict aeroacoustic performance of

jets are developed and validated using rig data.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Support development of analytical models and computer codes to predict jet noise and

validate the models using experimental data obtained in jet rig tests. Support

development of advanced diagnostic techniques to localize and quantify sound field

produced by fans and jets using model scale hardware in wind tunnels or other facilities

including engine test stands.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

*** Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011

***

Specific Work Elements 

1. Support development and application of analytical models and computer codes to

predict the acoustic fields radiated from jet exhausts. Validate the codes with

experimental data. 

2. Support development and implementation of two- and three-dimensional phased
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/003.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:05 AM]

arrays concepts/systems for noise diagnostic measurements in wind tunnel, free jet

facilities or engine test stands. 

3. Publish results in NASA reports, conference and/or journal papers.

4. Government's estimated period of performance is from April 1, 2009 through

September 30, 2011.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

********* NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 13, 2009 *********

Investigate source modeling for heated jets. This activity shall include the following

element(s):

1. Predict jet noise for a parametric set of hot round single stream jet cases and

compare the results with measured NASA data.

(12/31/2009)

2. Predict jet noise for a parametric set of hot round dual stream jet cases and compare

the results with measured NASA data.

(3/31/2010)

Investigate aeroacoustic influence of solid surfaces on jet noise. This activity shall

include the following element(s):

3. Outline an acoustic analogy based approach for modeling the influence of nearby solid

boundaries on jet noise.

(1/31/2010)

4. Develop and document a computer code embodying the theoretical model for

predicting noise form jet/surface interactions for a class of configurations that are

applicable to conventional pylon-mounted engines as well as hybrid wing body aircraft

configurations.

(09/30/2010)

5. Assess the ability of such a code for predicting noise for a set of appropriate

benchmark cases.

(06/30/2011)

Investigate the use of power laws for jet noise prediction:

6. Define an appropriate parameter space for a set of jet noise rig tests that would

supply data for developing scaling law(s) for predicting noise from round dual stream

jets.

(10/31/2009)

7. Develop and document scaling law(s) for predicting noise from round dual stream

jets.

(10/31/2010)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/003.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:05 AM]

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

A Ph.D. in engineering with extensive knowledge and experience in the following areas

are required: fluid dynamics and aeroacoustics; development of the underlying

mathematical framework and its translation into functional computer codes. Critical skills

required include expert knowledge of the statistical theory of aerodynamic noise with

particular emphasis on jet noise, sound/flow/surface interactions, and the propagation of

sound through inhomogeneous media.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/004.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Chato, David

Task Number: NNC06E004T - 16

Task Title: Cryogenic Fluid System Research & Engineering

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/12/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 7.

BACKGROUND: 

The Propulsion and Propellants Branch (RPP) has responsibility for developing technology

for storage and transfer of liquid cryogens. One aspect of this technology development is

conducting experiments using cryogens or cryogenic simulants. These tests are

conducted in either ground based (one-g), or low gravity environments.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

The contractor shall provide research and engineering in the Propulsion and Propellants

Branch. 

Research responsibilities shall include definition of experimental requirements, design of

experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and program support to define

and advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and Propellants Branch.

Engineering responsibilities will include conducting tests, writing check sheets, test stand

safety (including safety permits, adequacy of hardware, acquisition of data and

coordination of project engineers and technicians). Will also be responsible for the

design and build up of new test facilities.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

**Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011***

The contractor shall provide research and engineering in the Propuslion and Propellants

Branch. 

Research responsibilities shall include definition of experimental requirements, design of

experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and program support to define

and advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and Propellants Branch.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/004.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Engineering responsibilities shall include conducting tests, writing check sheets, test

stand safety (including safety permits, adequacy of hardware, acquisition of data and

coordination of project engineers and technicians). Will also be responsible for the

design and build up of new test facilities.

Specific Work Elements

a. Engineering analysis, design, and test for cryogenic components and systems. These

experiments will be tested at GRC and Plum Brook cryogenic test facilities (Small

Multipurpose Research Facility, Plum Brook facilities, etc.).

b. Engineering analysis, design, and test for low gravity cryogenic and cryogenic

simulant test beds. These experiments will be designed to be flown on NASA low gravity

test platforms.

c. Engineering analysis, design, and test of other cryogenic components and systems as

required by agreements with other NASA and industry agencies.

d. Proposal preparation in response to NRA’s RFP’s, etc. in the area of cryogenic

components or systems.

e. Technical analysis in support of multilayer insulation performance testing and heat

load calculation.

Travel Requirements:

Travel should be included for technical interchange meetings with other parties and for

presentation of test results at appropriate conferences.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables and Milestones to be met 

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - OCTOBER 1, 2009 *******

Milestones:

1. LCH4 Integrated feed system test kick off (10/31/09) 

2. NASA/Boeing ICD’s defined for Boeing LN2 calorimeter test (11/15/09)

3. LOX helium solubility test rig operational (11/15/09)

4. LOX helium solubility testing complete (11/30/09)

5. All CFM Project documentation required for FY10 (resource loaded schedule, CRCC

test facility schedules, CFM Products and Milestones) complete (11/30/09)

6. Training for use of Thermal Desktop software complete (12/15/09)

7. Boeing LN2 calorimeter test in bldg 301 tank 6 vacuum facility complete (1/31/10)

8. Methane Lunar Surface Thermal Control Test (MLSTCT) complete (3/15/10)

9. Planning for CFM technology required for in-space cryogenic propellant depots

(including flight experimentation) complete (3/31/10) 

Deliverables:

1. LCH4 Integrated CFM feed system “prototypical” test hardware development plan

complete (10/31/09)

2. NASA/Boeing ICD’s for Boeing LN2 calorimeter test complete (11/15/09)

3. All CFM Project FY 10 documentation (resource loaded schedule, CRCC test facility

schedules, CFM Products and Milestones) complete (11/30/09)

4. LCH4 Integrated CFM feed system requirements definition/SOW’s complete
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/004.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

(12/31/09)

5. For MLI performance variability research program 

a. Complete the Thermal control data base assessment (12/15/09)

b. Select MLI candidate configurations and develop a draft test matrix (12/15/09)

6. Heat Load/Boil Off analysis for Propellant Scavenging research program (1/31/10)

7. Preliminary analysis of Methane Lunar Surface Thermal Control Test (MLSTCT) data

using Cryo SIM complete (3/31/10)

8. CFM Project FY11 PPBE draft complete (3/31/10)

9. LCH4 Integrated CFM feed system hardware contracts awarded (3/31/10)

10. Project tracking and schedule updates for CFM Project (monthly)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior engineering and mid-level experience in cryogenic and vacuum system design

and operation shall be required to perform this work. Additional support from expert

engineer(s) and/or consultant(s) will be utilized on an as-needed basis. Additional limited

support from qualified engineer(s) will be utilized on an as-needed basis.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY: 

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/005.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Mccartney, Timothy

Task Number: NNC06E005T - 13

Task Title: Advanced Aircraft Research & Technology Project

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Advanced Aircraft Project Office has an interest in performing fundamental and focused

interdisciplinary research to study the behavior of candidate high temperature materials for

consideration in a variety of aerospace applications. Highly specialized experimental and

modeling techniques in material science, solid state physics and electronic engineering are

required to evaluate the properties and durability of advanced materials to support the technical

needs of the Office.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: The Contractor shall perform fundamental and focused

interdisciplinary research to study the behavior of candidate high temperature materials for

consideration in a variety of aerospace applications.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SCOPE OF WORK: The Advanced Aircraft Branch has had, and will continue to have, a

materials research role. The Branch supports materials development, testing, analysis and

performs modeling to provide specialized materials that meet performance requirements identified

by the AAP and their DoD and industry collaborators. 

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011.

SPECIFIC WORK ELEMENTS: 

The specific work elements of this task include:

1. Apply existing and develop appropriate science-based models to convert test measurement data

into material property values for material/component design and selection.

2. Provide guidance and conduct experimental research to support model development and

verification of properties. 

3. Document and report research results, via oral presentations and written technical articles,

which could include joint authorship with government and/or industry counterparts.

REQUIREMENTS:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/005.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

A top secret security clearance is required to perform the assigned tasks and maintain technical

exchange discussions with NASA and their contracted industry counterparts. The details are

classified.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

It should be noted that milestones and deliverables do not clarify content of task requirements due

to the nature of the program. The deliverables/milestones to be met include:

1. Modify existing software to maintain an accurate and efficient state-of-the-art approach to

analysis for use in candidate material property measurement data calculations on an on-going

basis.

2. Investigate the use of the CST Microwave Studio electromagnetic field simulation code to

establish the limitations of measurement and analysis procedures. Recommend and provide

guidance on the implementation of improvements.

3. Continue interactions with DoD and industry counterparts to evaluate and make use of the best

measurement and data analysis procedures. NASA measurement/analysis procedures must yield

the most accurate and consistent data. Document any changes and impact on industry standards of

measurement.

4. Participate in industry/government round-robin on measurement and analysis techniques.

Incorporate the best approaches into NASA measurement systems.

5. Investigate magnetic sample measurement methods and identify an appropriate procedure, and

work to implement its use within the project. Instruct Branch technician in use of procedure.

Provide written documentation for referencing.

6. Provide measurements of project samples from in-house and contracted sources. Anticipate

approximately 50 samples per year. Complete analyses within 2 months of receipt of samples.

7. Provide facility measurement system design, build and support. Provide measurements of

project hardware in the AAP facility. Work with research engineers to provide data reduction to

guide the test effort and complete analyses.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Research Electronics Engineer(s) with a top-secret security clearance. Contractor shall have
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/005.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

technical exchange discussions with NASA personnel and their contracted industry counterparts.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/006.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Dever, Joyce

Task Number: NNC06E006T - 26

Task Title: Environmental Durability of Advanced Materials

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 10..

The Durability & Protective Coatings Branch within the Structures and Materials Division

is responsible for evaluating the durability of advanced materials, identifying the causes

of materials degradation, and developing protective coatings for use as structural and/or

functional materials at high temperatures and in aggressive environments. Materials of

interest include metals, ceramics, polymers and composites. This task shall provide

support for developing, testing and characterizing advanced materials and coatings for

high temperature, aggressive aerospace environment applications. 

Specific testing techniques to address these research needs include exposure to

simulated aircraft engine combustion environments and high temperature isothermal and

cyclic furnace experiments. Test techniques also include vacuum hot pressing of two or

more materials, performing experiments and analysis of thermogravimetric analysis

(TGA) furnace data, preparing pre- and post-test specimens for characterization,

maintaining and calibrating experimental equipment and establishing safe working

conditions in and around the laboratory site. This research also requires development

and deposition of plasma sprayed and physical vapor deposited coatings. NASA projects

specify coating requirements necessitating development of deposition techniques and

optimizations to achieve compositions with desired physical and microstructural

properties to meet these requirements. This research requires preparation of test

materials, demonstration pieces and end-use components.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Subtask 01: Coatings Development

The contractor shall conduct robotic-based plasma spraying under ambient conditions

and in a low pressure vacuum chamber, and physical vapor deposition to apply coatings

to substrates of various types, sizes, and shapes for subsequent testing and

characterization; to provide protective overlay coatings on components for use in NASA

durability rigs; or as deliverables to mission project or industrial partners/customers. The

contractor shall also evaluate properties of the deposited coatings using available

laboratory techniques. NASA will provide necessary equipment and materials for these

activities. 

Subtask 02: Environmental Durability Testing

Eight Mach 0.3 Burner Rigs and the High Pressure Burner Rig (HPBR) are the test
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/006.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

systems used to evaluate the durability and life of research materials in simulated gas

turbine (jet fuel) and other hydrocarbon-fueled engines (which could potentially include

kerosene or methane-fueled combustion). In addition, the Quick Access Rocket Exhaust

Exposure Rig (QARE) simulates the combustion environment of O2/H2-fueled engines

and is used to evaluate the durability and life of materials and subcomponents for rocket

engine applications. The contractor shall perform testing using these specialized test

systems. NASA projects will provide specifications and materials to be tested. In order

for the contractor to perform work in these systems, it is necessary for the contractor to

have expertise operating similar test equipment, to be able to modify testing fixtures

and configurations to adapt to the specimens and materials to be tested and to use and

adapt specialized electronics and instrumentation systems for these tests.

Subtask 03: Oxidation Studies

Evaluating the durability of metals, ceramics, polymers, composites and coating

materials requires measuring the physical/thermal properties, establishing the oxidation-,

corrosion-, erosion-, and/or diffusion-resistance. To perform this work, the contractor

shall have expertise in the operation of laboratory testing/analysis equipment, equipment

set-up/evaluation, preparation/assembly for unique experiments set-ups, evaluation

techniques, and pre/post-test specimen preparation.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

For each subtask, NASA projects will provide material and test specifications and the

contractor shall provide coating development and/or testing to meet these NASAprovided requirements. Research activities which are deemed to require rig design

and/or modification should be reviewed with the NASA TR prior to initiating any

changes. 

Subtask 1:

The contractor shall maintain close collaboration with the NASA research team lead and

practice careful handling of the research materials before and after coating. The

contractor shall provide regular and conscientious maintenance, modification, calibration,

operation and accurate record keeping of the plasma spray rigs and associated

instrumentation is very important to the success of the research activities.

The Performance-Based Contractor shall:

1. Develop and optimize deposition parameters, and apply single- and multiple-layered

coatings for structural and functional research materials.

2. Apply/optimize coatings by plasma spray deposition onto various substrate materials

required to meet NASA programmatic goals.

3. Conduct routine rig maintenance and continuing assessment of rig performance and

reproducibility in spraying the various coatings the proper and timely calibration of

research equipment.

4. Practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories.

5. Continue development, upgrade and operation of the test rigs to provide the

appropriate test parameters/procedures to best evaluate the performance of the

aerospace propulsion and power materials for NASA and industry technology

development projects.

6. Attend required training for handling and disposing of hazardous materials, for

selecting/using the proper protective equipment, or other safety-related training required

for performing the work.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/006.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

7. Keep abreast of the laboratories, equipment, chemical storage, characterization, and

safety-related equipment operational status/failures or other issues to support the

proper operation and ready availability of the Plasma Spray Facility. 

Subtask 2:

Mach 0.3/0.8 Burner Rig, High Pressure Burner Rig (HPBR)and QUick Access Rocket

Exhaust (QARE)Rig studies of these research materials are required by this subtask.

Testing under extreme conditions, such as high heat flux, high temperature and possibly

corrosion conditions, high flow velocities and elevated pressures are necessary. Burner

rig operations require hearing protection and annual auditory testing as well as fuel

handling/spill prevention. The oxygen and hydrogen-fueled QARE requires special

training in handling hydrogen tanks and working with high concentration mixtures of

hydrogen and oxygen. Close collaboration with team lead research scientist/engineer

and conscientious maintenance, rig modifications, equipment calibration and operation

and accurate record keeping of the testing facilities and associated instrumentation is

critical to the overall success of the research tasks.

Performance Based Contractor shall:

1. Conduct oxidation, corrosion, erosion and hot corrosion tests of advanced materials

under simulated engine conditions.

2. Develop techniques and perform experiments to determine the thermal shock

resistance of advanced materials.

3. Perform experiments on processing and characterizing of advanced materials.

4. Continue development, up-grades and operation of the test rigs to provide the

appropriate test parameters/procedures to best evaluate the performance of the

aerospace propulsion and power materials for NASA and industry technology

development projects.

5. Conduct pre/post-test evaluation/sample documentation for reporting, along with the

test parameters and data to the team lead.

6. Practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories and

maintain properly and timely calibration of equipment.

7. Keep abreast of the laboratories, equipment, chemical storage, characterization, and

safety-related equipment operational status/failures or other issues to support the

proper operation and ready availability of the laboratories in Buildings 24 and 34.

8. Attend required training for handling and disposing of hazardous materials, for

selecting/using the proper protective equipment, or other safety-related training required

for performing the work function.

Subtask 3:

Characterizing advanced material behavior and degradation behavior in aerospace

propulsion environments requires carefully controlled, high-temperature laboratory tests.

A variety of tests are conducted to determine the environmental durability of various

materials in controlled environments. Diffusion-bonding experiments are important in the

study of the chemical compatibility of different materials. Conscientious operation,

maintenance and calibration of sensitive laboratory equipment is required. In addition,

complete knowledge and experience in machining appropriate test specimens and

performing post-test metallographic sample preparation is needed.

The Performance Based Contractor shall:

1. Perform experimental system set-up, execute furnace-based testing of research

material specimens, which would include metals, ceramics, polymers and their

composites, and prepare for/coordinate obtaining chemical, microstructural analysis and

evaluation.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/006.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

2. Conduct thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), furnace and vacuum hot press testing of

advanced materials and coatings.

3. Perform machining of specimens, conduct metallographic preparation of research

materials for microscopic characterization, and determine/measure specimen physical

properties important to the individual studies. 

4. Practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories, and

around laboratory sites, and maintain proper and timely calibration of instruments.

5. Keep abreast of the laboratories, equipment, chemical storage, characterization, and

safety-related equipment operational status/failures or other issues to support the

proper operation and ready availability of the laboratories in Buildings 100-Annex and

106.

6. Attend required training for handling and disposing of hazardous materials, for

selecting/using the proper protective equipment, or other safety-related training required

for performing the work.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Monthly activity reports. The contents of the monthly reports are evaluated at the end

of the 6 month award fee period. At the request of the TR, the contents of these reports

should have emphasis on the following items: 

a) Technical work performed including research activity, effort level, status, and other

research engineers involved in project. 

b) Facility issues such as equipment operation, maintenance, calibration activities,

downtime, and facility or equipment needs. 

c) General issues related to work, progress, schedules, equipment and laboratory needs,

safety issues, etc. 

2. Technical highlights describing significant accomplishments within on-going laboratory

and testing studies shall be drafted and submitted to the NASA TR for organizational

reporting to NASA management.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

******* NEW AS OF AFP7 – OCTOBER 1, 2009 ************

Bring new 1650 C TGA system to operational condition by 12/1/2009 in support of the

Hypersonics Project.

Initiate furnace testing of advanced thermal barrier coatings by 2/1/2010 for research

under the Supersonics Project.

***************************************************

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/006.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

This work will be assigned to the Materials Durability Section of the contractor. Progress

reviews will be conducted regularly with the cognizant NASA TR. Any revisions to the

personnel requirements which may result from these reviews and will be mutually

agreed upon by the TR and Contractor supervisor. 

Subtask 01: Contractor shall provide professional expertise to perform the task activities.

The work in plasma spraying requires senior engineering ability with extensive

experience in various aspects of plasma spray coating technology. Must be able to

program and execute programs for two six axis industrial robotic systems, (Asea Brown

Boveri S3 AAB IRB 2400) ability to program, edit, and execute robotic programs using

ABB Robotware software application and Programaker. Contractor shall provide

engineering support to perform the task activities. 

Subtask 02: Contractor shall provide professional expertise with detailed knowledge and

experience in burner rig operations, general electronics, sample preparation techniques,

high temperature furnaces, design and fabrication of specialized fixtures, mechanical,

thermal and electrical property testing, and data acquisition systems. Professional should

also have experience in computer programs such as Matlab, Testpoint, visual basic, and

HP basic.

Subtask03: Contractor shall be capable of providing hands-on technical support and

must possess a signficantly detailed background and expertise in oxidation and corrosion

testing, thermogravimetric experiments, general electronics, data acquisition techniques,

vacuum systems and leak detection, metallographic analysis, microscopy, and high

temperature furnaces.

Government Furnished Property

NONE

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/007.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Politi, Michael

Task Number: NNC06E007T - 12

Task Title: Service Module Mechanisms Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/6/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Entered as WISE Task 20061121 on 11/29/2006, ljm

This Task was formerly GESS Task 526.

No Bid form and email received 07/10/2006, ljm.

Entered as WISE Task 20060703, ljm. 

GRC has been given responsibility for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Service Module

(SM) and Spacecraft Adapter (SA). As part of this GRC will be developing requirements,

performing design cycles for government reference configurations, providing

insight/oversight of the contractor’s development of SM/SA and performing Independent

Verification and Validation (IV&V) of contractor efforts.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide mechanical engineering services in support of design cycles for the Prime

Contractor vehicle. Provide engineering consultation regarding mechanism designs and

layouts. Support IV&V activities of contractor efforts. Some data will be considered NASA

Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) and must be handled accordingly.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

*** Government's Estimated Period of Performance April 1, 2009 to Completion of

GESS-2 Contract

The contractor shall:

Provide consulting on vehicle mechanism designs

Support the CEV design analysis cycles

Perform conceptual layouts of mechanisms using Pro/Engineer

Assist in refining specific mechanisms through investigation of previous spacecraft

applications.

Review documents in support of vehicle requirements reviews.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/007.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

The Government will provide:

Pro/E models of existing vehicle configurations

Access to Pro/E

Access to documentation

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

1. Review of inputs by contractor for the Master Equipment List, including mass, volume

and power.

2. Review of inputs to design analysis cycle Engineering Reports.

3. Monthly Technical Progress Report.

4. Technical comments to documents for vehicle requirements reviews, including peer

reviews, technical reviews, and Vehicle PDR.

5. Support Project level reviews for sub-system and module PDR.

6. Weekly technical progress reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 20

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Seasoned engineers who have experience with space flight hardware, Pro/E,

mechanisms, and mechanical design and analysis.

Government Furnished Property

GRC shall provide:

1. Access to Pro/ENGINEER models of existing vehicle configurations

2. Access to Pro/ENGINEER for use by the contractor.

3. Access to Windchill

4. Access to Ansys

Safety and Assurance Plans
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/007.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/008.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Sil, Ajit

Task Number: NNC06E008T - 9

Task Title: RTM Data Management

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 2/24/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 12.

BACKGROUND: 

The RTM Branch is a branch within the NASA John Glenn Research Center tasked with the

evaluation of advanced propulsion technologies and systems. This mission requires the use of a

number of analysis codes. Creation of the input files and input data for these codes, the resulting

output data, and the reports and presentations used to communicate these results constitute the

major work product of this office. Management of these data and files is of critical importance to

RTM.

The primary focus of this task shall be to create and maintain a system to manage the retention of

this data and to assist the RTM engineers in utilizing this system. 

The overall objective is to facilitate the average ASAO engineer in performing their work while at

the same time making sure that the data ASAO generates is retained in a format that will assist

other users now and in the future.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Provide Configuration Management support for Aeropropulsion Systems Analysis Office

(ASAO). The primary focus of this task shall be to create and maintain a system to manage the

retention of this data and to assist the ASAO engineers in utilizing this system.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The scope of this work shall be to provide data management for CODE RTM using appropriate

tools including the ClearCase program to maintain configuration and version control of all input,

results data, and files used in RTM analyses, as well as documents reporting the results of the

analysis. The scope shall also include creation of scripts and other automation to assist the user in

setting up their analysis environment in the proper configuration as specified by the RTM Data

Management Plan. The work shall also include keeping up to date documentation, including the

Data Management Plan, the RTM users guide, and the RTM Clear Case administrator's data
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/008.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

management plan.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

Perform daily ClearCase maintenance. This includes; creating branches & views/work areas,

merging to mainline, creating labels, download requested NPSS versions, & troubleshooting

issues on VOB. (On-going)

Issue reports of Data Management system activity, including monthly progress report. (Monthly)

Document and provide training in the use of ClearCase to the PSAB, both UNIX and Windows

inter-operational environment. This includes individualized training to PSAB VOB users so that

they have a hands-on experience and a better understanding of how they will use the system.

(On-going)

Continue to encourage PSAB members to transition to Windows ClearCase to prepare for the

transition to an all Windows ClearCase instead of interoperations. Get PSAB VOB

documentation updated to a Windows only. (On-going)

Support the development of the Database & Design Characteristics & Trends task.(as-needed) 

Develop configuration management plan for the P-Beat tools and associated inputs.

Work with the SPACE team to start them using the VOB to do VAC analysis to determine if this

is the way they would like to work in the future.

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

Attend Enterprise Configuration Management training as compatible with scheduling and training

availability.

*******************************************************

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

N/A
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/008.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/010.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Nathal, Michael

Task Number: NNC06E010T - 13

Task Title: Advanced Metallics Technology

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 15.

Advanced metallic/intermetallic alloys are required in future aerospace systems to meet the

demands of high operating temperatures, high strength-to-weight ratio, resistance to aggressive

environments, and fabrication. The Advanced Metallics Branch is conducting basic research on

these materials in the areas of materials development, durability evaluation, processing, and

joining technology of both monolithic and composite materials.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The objective of this task is to conduct experimental research functions where the overall

objective and scope of work is to develop and test advanced alloys, intermetallics, and their

composites. The second area will to optimize the materials processing conditions and properties of

monolithic and composite materials (both metallic and intermetallic). 

There are two main areas of performance under this task. One is in the area of mechanical creep

testing. Here, the contractor staff shall support, operate, and maintain numerous creep lab

facilities. Duties include sample preparation, test setup, and experimental testing in conjunction

with developing quality test methodologies. A second area of focus are the activities related to a

heat treatment lab. Here, numerous high temperature furnaces must must be operated and

maintained in support of the targeted materials research. Processing equipment that spans testing

in air, vacuum, and inert environments will be operated and maintained.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work

The contractor shall perform this task with an objective to conduct experimental research

functions where the overall objective and scope of work is to develop and test advanced alloys,

intermetallics, and their composites. 

Specific Work Elements

1. Conduct experimental and analytical research to optimize and test monolithic and composite

metallic materials; to determine, tabulate, and evaluate physical, mechanical, and metallurgical

properties of monolithic and composite metallic materials. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/010.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

2. Operate and maintain equipment in research laboratories including, but not limited to, creeprupture; air, vacuum, and inert gas furnaces, metallography and optical microscopy, and metal

working.

3. Develop new test methods based on specific material behavior and programmatic requirements.

4. Specific work elements include various aspects of materials processing and testing, such as:

prepare, test, and evaluate advanced alloys, intermetallic compounds and metal matrix

composites. Specimen preparation includes cutting, chemical etching, glass encapsulation,

metallography and checking for dimensional tolerances. Tests include set-up, operation, and

maintenance of creep rupture test stands, annealing furnaces, thermal cycling, tensile testing,

vacuum systems, and hot isostatic pressing machines. Many of the above tasks require the use of

computer controlled machines. Evaluation will include use of data acquisition systems and data

reduction using appropriate software packages, photography and microscopy.

5. Communicate research progress and results to NASA TR via oral discussions and written

monthly progress reports and to engineers requesting service through frequent oral discussions.

6. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical meetings, technology transfer,

presentation of research, and in acquiring training or course work useful for enhancing

capabilities to perform the task.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

*****************1. Monthly Technical Progress Reports. 

The contents of monthly activity reports will be evaluated at the end of the current Award Fee

Period. 

At the request of the TR, the contents of these reports will emphasize: 

a) technical progress in the various specific work elements cited and any special achievements

and/or new technologies developed in the process, 

b) information relating the details of installation, operation, and maintenance of laboratory

equipment,

c) number of task orders processed and associated response times, and 

d) an explanation of any down time, date, time duration, type of delay and reason, and the

resolution.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 25

Cost 15

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

******** This task requires trained technician support with a minimum of 5 years relevant

experience in the areas of materials processing and materials characterization and testing. 

Limited direct labor support will be required for task management.********
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/010.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/013.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

Technical Representative: Soulas, George

Task Number: NNC06E013T - 16

Task Title: Ion Thruster Hardware Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/6/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 19.

BACKGROUND: 

The NASA Glenn Research Center is responsible for conducting programs utilizing various

on-board propulsion technologies for a number of applications. These technologies

include gridded ion thrusters, which offer performance benefits over other advanced

chemical and electric propulsion systems for certain high energy earth orbital and deep

space missions. Propulsion systems utilizing ion thrusters need to be brought to a high

level of development to enable these missions. This requires both theoretical and

experimental evaluation of long-life/high performance ion thrusters and ion thruster

systems. Contractor personnel have been working in the area of electric propulsion

research at GRC,and are well suited to support future activities of this type.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

It is the goal of NASA GRC to develop a high-performance, 1.0 kW-10 kW throttle-able

ion thruster, and associated power processing technology, appropriate for both earthorbit applications of national interest, and for primary propulsion for deep-space

interplanetary missions. It is also the goal of NASA GRC to develop sub-kilowatt, and 30-

kilowtt class ion thruster technology. The contractor shall provide engineering design,

fabrication, and assembly functions for the development of current and next generation

ion thrusters in these power ranges.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

The NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) ion propulsion program addresses the need for

high specific impulse ion propulsion systems and technology across a broad range of

mission applications and power levels NASA GRC is involved in essentially all U.S.

government ion propulsion development activities in either a leadership position and/or

in a technical management role. Development areas include: high-power - both highthroughput and high-specific impulse - engine components, engines, and power

processing technology, lightweight high-efficiency sub-kilowatt ion propulsion, and

fundamentals. NASA GRC is also leading two highly focused activities: development of
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/013.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

the Next Generation Ion propulsion system for the agency (NEXT – NASA’s Evolutionary

Xenon Thruster) under the In-Space Program, and development of high-power highspecific impulse ion thruster technology applicable to nuclear systems (HiPEP – High

Power Electric Propulsion) under Project Prometheus. NASA GRC is also supporting a

number of other agency ion propulsion initiatives: flight thruster hardware component

manufacturing and flight thruster and power processor technical support for the DAWN

flight project; post-life test analysis of the flight spare NSTAR thruster; technical

oversight of carbon-based ion optics activities and high-power ion thruster technology

activities at JPL; and support of United States Air Force materials contracts for carbonbased ion optics fabrication. NASA GRC also continues to support on-orbit operations of

the International Space Station plasma contactor systems, which use hollow cathodes

manufactured at GRC, for spacecraft charge control.

The Contractor shall provide engineering design, fabrication, and assembly functions for

the development of current and next generation ion thrusters in these power ranges.

Specific Work Elements:

1. Assist with the completion of design analyses, manufacturing, fabrication, assembly,

performance, and rework of large-area (nominal 40 cm beam diameter) ion thruster

technology compatible with 5/10-kW class ion propulsion design goals and requirements.

2. Transfer manufacturing knowledge to NASA contractor off-site personnel for advanced

thruster development activities.

3. Support and conduct manufacturing of sub-kilowtt, and 30-kW class ion thruster

technology.

4. Support and conduct manufacturing, test, and integration of space flight hardware

including hollow cathode technology for the International Space Station Plasma

Contactor Unit, and cathode technology for electric propulsion.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

Specific Milestones:

*** NEW as of Award Fee Period 7 *************************************

1. Support EM thruster life testing, NEXT thruster testing (including the system

integration test), and thruster component life testing including propellant isolator,

cathode, and cathode heaters, to be completed 09/30/10. 

2. Support NEXT thruster and system level testing to be implemented off-site at The

Aerospace Corporation, JPL, and other potential locations. By 09/30/10.

3. Support any integration & testing associated with the ISS PCU & HCA packages, to be

completed by 09/30/10.

4. Support electric propulsion project tasks including manufacturing and testing of ion

optics, high power ion and Hall thrusters, and thruster manufacturing infrastructure

upgrades, by 09/30/10.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/013.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM]

**********************************************************************

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 45

Schedule 45

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Prior experience in ion thruster design, fabrication, and assembly. 

*** NEW as of Award Fee Period 7 *************************************

Prior experience in hollow cathode design, fabrication, and assembly. 

**********************************************************************

Prior experience in space flight hardware fabrication and integration.

Government Furnished Property

*** NEW as of Award Fee Period 7 *************************************

Thruster hardware and components, as well as manufacturing facilities.

**********************************************************************

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/014.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Melcher, Kevin

Task Number: NNC06E014T - 24

Task Title: Health Monitoring Technology

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The NASA Glenn Research Center conducts research programs in the area of aerospace

vehicle and subsystem health management. Research is conducted to improve aerospace

systems reliability, maintainability and operability. Specific research areas include the

investigation and implementation of artificial intelligence techniques to solve real-time

(on-board) and post-test/flight condition monitoring problems, the development of

robust and generally applicable condition monitoring techniques, and component and

system modeling to support the development and validation of these techniques.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide technologies to improve aerospace systems reliability,

maintainability and operability, and shall provide system simulations under nominal and

degraded conditions to support the validation of these technologies.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

NOTE: Revisions for this initial Period 7 statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk

(*)

Broad Scope of Work: Contractor shall research and develop diagnostic and prognostic

condition monitoring algorithms. Contractor shall develop real-time and non-real-time

condition monitoring systems which can monitor, analyze, prognose, diagnose and

enable remediation of space flight and ground support systems and components.

Contractor shall develop software that will enable the implementation of these condition

monitoring systems. Contractor shall develop and implement strategies to validate these

condition monitoring techniques and resulting systems using hardware and software

testbeds.

To accomplish the previously stated work objectives, the contractor shall:

1. Support the planning of new system health management projects and re-planning of

existing system health management projects by providing input for technical content and

schedule.

2. Participate in meetings and telecons required to coordinate work with other NASA,

government, industry, and/or academic partners.

3. Conduct system performance analysis to define condition management requirements.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/014.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Systems include current and planned reusable and expendable launch vehicles, as well

as, ground support systems, aircraft, and other systems to which the technology can be

transferred.

4. Develop, modify and exercise appropriate system simulations in support of health

management and condition monitoring activities.

5. Develop methods to introduce and/or improve sensor validation, anomaly detection,

automated diagnostics and life prediction for current and future aerospace systems.

5a. Implement and demonstrate methods in project-defined context (e.g., software

simulations, real-time with hardware testbed).

5b. Analyze methods to assess performance, benefits, applicability.

6. Interact with appropriate specialists to understand and interpret system and

component operation under nominal and fault conditions.

7. Develop and maintain expertise in current state-of-the-art health management and

condition monitoring strategies based on conventional and artificial intelligence

techniques, in particular, neural networks, expert systems, genetic algorithms and

model-based reasoning.

8. Review SBIR proposals associated with vehicle health management topics. 

9. Provide written documentation of technical work. Present work at appropriate

meetings and conferences. Represent GRC at health monitoring technical interchange

meetings.

10. Support transfer of technologies developed under this task to other industries such

automotive, medical and process control.

11. Clearly communicate progress and issues in a timeframe and manner commensurate

with their impact.

*12 The contractor shall follow applicable NASA and RHC procedures when conducting

work in support of the branch.

NOTE: Revisions for this initial Period 7 statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk

(*)

Specific Work Elements: 

Ares I Program/Upper Stage (US) Project/Thrust Vector Control (TVC) Project

1. Reporting work

1a. The contractor shall document results of the fault propagation timing study

completed during the previous performance period.

1b. The contractor shall document work relevant to the US TVC Diagnostic Model and

present that work at a Conference.

2. Develop updates to US TVC portions of the Ares I Abort Conditions Report (ACR)

2a. The contractor shall develop updates to US TVC portions of the ACR 

*2b. The contractor shall support integration and approval of the ACR by the Ares I

Vehicle Integration Project.

3. Develop updates to US TVC portions of the Ares I Fault Detection Notification and

Response (AFDNR) System Definition Document (SDD)

3a. The contractor shall develop updates to the Ares I US TVC Abort Condition Detection

Algorithms for the AFDNR SDD.

3b. The contractor shall develop updates to Ares I US TVC Caution and Warning

information for the AFDNR SDD.

3c. The contractor shall develop updates to the Ares I Upper Stage TVC Fault Detection

Isolation and Response information for the AFDNR SDD.

4. Develop Ares I US TVC TEAMS-based Diagnostic model in support of Ares I Functional

Fault Analysis (FFA) and Advanced Ground-based Diagnosis

4a. The contractor shall incorporate US TVC Architecture/FMEA/Fault Propagation Timing

changes into US TVC TEAMS-based Diagnostic model. NASA will provide changes to

Architecture/FMEA/Fault Propagation Timing.

4b. The contractor shall conduct US TVC Fault Effects Propagation Timing Studies.

*4c. The contractor shall support FFA review of the US TVC TEAMS-based Diagnostic

model and its integration into the Ares I integrated Diagnostic model. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/014.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

5. Level of Effort Tasks

5a. The contractor shall support coordination of work with teams working the Ares I

Project. For example: the Integrated Upper Stage Thrust Vector Control Team; the

Functional Fault Analysis Team; and the Fault Detection, Diagnosis and Response

Working Group.

5b. The contractor shall review official Ares I documents in support of official and

unofficial reviews. For example: Table top review of Fault Detection Notification and

Response System Definition Document.

6. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical and/or technology

transfer meetings, presentations or research papers, and in acquiring training or course

work useful for enhancing capabilities in performing this task.

*6a. Contractor to make one trip to attend the Functional Fault Analysis Technical

Interchange Meeting for TEAMS Modelers.

7. Other

7a. The contractor shall complete and submit a status report summary for the entire

performance period that addresses performance criteria for each milestone/deliverable

described in this statement of work.

*7b. Provide nominal hardware/software maintenance for workstations located in

building 77, room 112/124 and utilized by the Controls & Dynamics Branch for research

and development activities. Install new operating system releases, COTS software and

updates, and computer hardware. Develop software, where appropriate and install

patches, if available, to meet NASA specified security standards.

7c. As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include

any open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements)

including any mitigation activities.

7d. The contractor shall comply with the Center Level Procedure GRC-P2.6.4,

"Implementation - Software Development".

NOTE: Revisions for this initial Period 7 statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk

(*)

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

NOTE: Revisions for this initial Period 7 statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk

(*)

Ares I Program/Upper Stage (US) Avionics Project/Thrust Vector Control (TVC) Project

1. Conduct fault timing study using integrated models for US TVC and Ares I vehicle.

*1a. The contractor shall deliver a final report that documents results of the fault

propagation timing study completed during the performance period 5. The final report

shall have completed RHC technical and managerial review and be suitable for

publication as a NASA TM. Due by 10/30/2009.

*1b. The contractor shall develop and submit to the 2010 Infotech@Aerospace

Conference an abstract for a paper documenting work that is relevant to the US TVC

Diagnostic Model. Due by 10/23/2009.

*1c. The contractor deliver a draft paper to the US TVC team for review. Said paper to

document work that is relevant to the US TVC Diagnostic Model. Due by 3/1/2010.

2. Develop updates for US TVC inputs to Ares I Abort Conditions Report

2a. The contractor shall deliver US TVC inputs to the Abort Conditions Report (Rev. A).

Due by 1/20/2010.

3. Develop updates to US TVC portions of the Ares I Fault Detection Notification and

Response (FDNR) System Definition Document (SDD)

*3a. The contractor shall deliver updates to the Ares I US TVC Abort Condition Detection

Algorithms for the AFDNR SDD. Due by 10/30/2009.

*3b. The contractor shall deliver updates to Ares I US TVC Caution and Warning
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/014.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

information for the AFDNR SDD. Due by 10/30/2009.

*3c. The contractor shall deliver updates to the Ares I Upper Stage TVC Fault Detection

Isolation and Response information for the AFDNR SDD. Due by 10/30/2009.

4. Develop US TVC TEAMS-based Diagnostic model in support of Ares I Functional Fault

Analysis

*4a. The contractor shall complete and deliver an updated Upper Stage TEAMS-based

Diagnostic Model (Rev. 2) revised to address comments from prior FFA review of the

model. Due by 10/30/2009.

*4b. The contractor shall deliver an updated TVC TEAMS-based Diagnostic model (Rev.

3) incorporating changes to the US TVC Architecture/FMEA/Timing changes. Due by

1/4/2010.

*4c. The contractor shall complete and deliver an updated Upper Stage TEAMS-based

Diagnostic Model (Rev. 3) revised to address comments from prior FFA review of the

model. Due by 2/26/2010.

*4d. The contractor shall complete and deliver results from US TVC Fault Effects

Propagation Timing Study (Rev. 3). Due by 3/31/2010.

6. Travel

*6a. Attend Functional Fault Analysis Technical Interchange meeting for TEAMS

Modelers. Meeting date and location TBD.

7. Other

*7a. Deliver status report summary for the entire performance period addressing

performance criteria for each milestone/deliverable. Due by 3/31/2010.

NOTE: Revisions for this initial Period 7 statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk

(*)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 35

Schedule 35

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Highly skilled in development and implementation (including real-time) of health

management technologies for space systems. Advanced programming in Fortran,

C/C++, Matlab/Simulink, and proficiency with TEAMS software.

Government Furnished Property

Health Management Testbed hardware and software. Matlab/Simulink software – License

No’s 254274, 18747, 220189, & 321084. TEAMS software - two licenses.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/015.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Braunscheidel, Edward

Task Number: NNC06E015T - 13

Task Title: Turbomachinery Technology Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 3/31/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

BACKGROUND: The Turbomachinery and Heat Transfer Branch (RTT) conducts research

on a number of turbomachinery components for aircraft turbine engines. In order to

further improve the efficiency and operability of propulsion systems, novel approaches

must be investigated. Research is aimed at providing the enabling turbomachinery

technology for future high performance gas turbine engines. Component types include

fans, compressors and turbines. The work on axial compressors, centrifugal

compressors, and turbines is focused on providing an understanding of the flow physics

associated with the aerodynamics of steady and unsteady flows. Advanced experimental

techniques are being applied, including optical non-intrusive methods, pressure sensitive

paint, miniature unsteady flow probes, and thin film (hot wire) elements. The research is

applicable to high-speed aircraft, general aviation/commuter aircraft and subsonic

transports.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

The general goal of this task is to improve understanding of the flow physics of

advanced turbomachinery components and provide experimental data in a centrifugal

compressor. The above objectives are to be achieved by applying advanced

experimental techniques focusing on dynamic probe development.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Statement of Work:

**Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is Oct 1, 2009 to March 31,2010**

Execute the development of a dynamic pitor cylinder probe that is compatible with

turbomachinery flow fields with temperatures up to 500 Deg F, and pressures up to 60

psia. Probe drawings generated under this task will be fabricated inhouse at NASA GRC.

Contractor will provide input on fabrication approach, and monitor effort. Contractor will

perform probe assembly, calibration, and performance testing of the probe using NASA

provided equipment and facilities.

The general goal of this task is to improve understanding of the flow physics of
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/015.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

advanced turbomachinery components 

Specific Work Elements:

***For the period of 10/1/2009 through 3/31/2010***

1. Execute the mechanical design of the probe

2. Monitor fabrication of the probe in-house at NASA GRC

3. Develop data aquisition software and perform calibrations of the probe

4. Assist in aquiring data in the CC3 centrifugal compressor in test cell CE-18

5. Provide final report on data acquired with probe, and manual of unsteady data

reduction procedures.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Deliver Final Probe design drawings (Nov, 2009)

2. Perform and document calibrations of probe (Jan, 2010).

3. Assist in the data acquisition, reduction and reporting of unsteady data taken in the

CC3 centrifugl compressor (Feb 2010)

4. Final report on probe performance and software program.(March 2010) 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE:

Ph.D. in Aerospace or Mechanical Engineering with at least 15 years of experience in

advanced experimental measuring techniques involving specifically, build-up, and

operating of advanced measurement systems with a heavy emphasis on unsteady

pressure measurement instrumentation and unsteady diagnostics in general. A

background in turbomachinery and cascade testing is essential. 

Limited administrative support may be needed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/015.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

All experimental testing will be done in GRC facilities with necessary instrumentation and

hardware furnished by the government.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/016.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Cooper, Sylvia

Task Number: NNC06E016T - 13

Task Title: Software Config/Document Mgmt

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The core teams managed under Code R at NASA GRC support complex simulation modeling

tools used for systems analysis throughout NASA as well as industry partners, academia, and

other government agencies. Tools and development activities supported include, but are not

limited to the Multidisciplinary Analysis Design & Optimization (MDAO) capability and the

Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS).

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Performing software configuration management (SCM) for the complex simulation tools

supported in Code R is the primary focus of this task. Providing SCM for the new capabilities

being developed and generating builds will be completed throughout the performance period.

SCM support is needed to support other projects and tools as required.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

******* NEW as of 10/1/09 Government's Estimated Period Of Performance October 1, 2009 to

March 30, 2011

The contractor shall provide software configuration management using selected software

configuration management and tracking tools to support the software development effort and to

maintain control of all team software, documentation, and software tools. The contractor shall

provide support on platforms including Windows, python, and Linux in a networked environment.

The contractor shall provide support for the evaluation, configuration, implementation, and

maintenance of the selected software configuration management and problem tracking tools. 

Specific Work Elements:

The contractor shall:

1. Configure, implement, and maintain selected software configuration management and problem
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/016.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

tracking tools.

2. Provide training, database access, and help desk support to project 

teams in using the CM tools.

3.  NEW as of 10/1/2009** *Write the Software Configuration Management Plan and

implement using the automated CM tools.

4. Update the Software Configuration Management Plan and related 

software configuration management documentation as needed. 

5. Implement and maintain (using automated tools) all aspects of 

configuration identification (including the numbering scheme for 

software and documentation and labeling of baselines), control 

(including the release process for software and documentation), and 

status accounting in accordance with the Software Configuration 

Management Plan.

6. Develop and maintain configuration management procedures and forms 

to achieve a controlled, effective and efficient software 

development environment.

7. Prepare software and documentation releases including Version 

Description Documents (VDD) using the automated SCM tools upon 

request.

8. Establish and maintain paper files and CD releases as required. 

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a distributed

cost.

If travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has 

either been budgeted into the accompanying cost plan, or an 

amendment will be issued to cover the additional task requirements.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

Create the official Software Release packages (as required).

Update Software Configuration Management Plan and related software configuration

management documentation (****NEW as of 10/1/09 - 3/30/10)***.

Maintain software configuration management environments (on-going).

Document and provide training in use of CM tools(on-going).

Create and maintain baselines and releases for builds, incremental releases, and full releases (as

required). 

Provide status accounting reports as new baselines are established upon request.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/016.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 10

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

CM Analyst

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/017.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Crandall, Karen

Task Number: NNC06E017T - 15

Task Title: Program Support for the Projects Liaison and Integration Office

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 25.

Program management support to the Aeronautics projects at GRC.

This task is being used to provide a broad range of program management support to the Projects

Liaison and Integration Office at GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide the following program management support:

Scheduling

-- Develop and maintain the official GRC Fundamental Aeronautics (FA) project schedules, as

required

-- Provide what-if schedule analyses to the project managers, as required

-- Maintain a milestone and deliverables registry, as required

-- Coordinate the schedules as part of the FA Program scheduling team

-- Provide leadership for the scheduling effort within the office

Database Management

-- Develop and maintain an award tracking system for tracking the Fundamental Aeronautics

(FA) Program NASA Research Announcements (NRAs) as they are awarded, funded and

completed. Support evaluation phase as required. Work with the Projects' NRA managers and the

FA Program Business Manager.

-- Develop and maintain database system of reporting Hypersonics Project Financials at the

Discipline level on a monthly basis. 

Project Reports

-- Collect and produce input to the NASA 90 day reports from the Aeronautics projects, as

required

-- Provide weekly project calendar updates, as required

Configuration and Risk Management

-- Assist in the implementation of configuration and risk management by the projects as required

Records Management

-- Maintain an archival and retrieval system for recent and on-going GRC Aeronautics Projects
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/017.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

utilizing and following the NASA Records Management guidelines.

ARES I-X Mission Management Support

-- Provide and maintain calendars of major events and of detailed events for the ARES I-X

Mission.

-- Provide meeting support on weekly basis by obtaining IPT inputs and consolidating into report

to brief Mission Manager and serves as foundation of reporting to Ares I Management. 

-- Run Web Ex and telecons for calendar reviews and senior management tag ups.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall:

Provide scheduling assistance to Project Management including GRC Project and Associate

Project Managers in the Research and Technology Directorate. Serve as the focal point for NASA

GRC Fundamental Aeronautics project schedules, milestones, and deliverables. Perform impact

analysis of monthly schedule status.

Maintain the NRA Award Tracking System for the FA Program, generating reports of data as

required.

Maintain Hypersonics Discipline Financial Data, generating reports of data as required. 

Maintain the Ares I-X calendars for the Constellation Program, generating reports as required.

The tasks may also include resource planning and tracking, risk management and configuration

management support, and records management.

The government will provide the requirements for the tasks, parameters/guidelines to bound the

work, and the technical interaction with the appropriate project people to obtain the required

project information to complete the tasks.

The contractor shall provide the expertise to accomplish the tasks within the budget specified and

the timeframe required.

Travel and Training may be required to support these tasks.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following list is the milestones and deliverables for this period:

1. Current (within 2 months) schedules for the Fundamental Aeronautics Projects at GRC

2. Schedule status updates, as required

3. Database of available NRA information as provided by FA Projects

4. A 90 day calendar of all Ares I-X major events as identified by the government

5. A current (within 2 months or as entries are received) inventory of all archived materials from

completed or canceled projects as required by this task

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/017.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 55

Schedule 40

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Being able to work on a multifaceted team, across projects and NASA Centers.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/019.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Miller, Sharon

Task Number: NNC06E019T - 24

Task Title: Space Environmental Durability Research & Technology Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 27.

The Space Environment and Experiments Branch of the Space Processes and Experiments

Division is interested in advancing the state of technology in the areas of space power system

materials and coatings as well as for spin-off applications. Mechanical and electrical engineering

competencies are required to conduct these research and technology efforts.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

******NEW AS OF AFP6 4/01/09; Removed "fabrication" in first sentence as this is no longer

needed*****************

Activities include the design, development, acquisition, assembly, checkout and operation of test

facilities and experiment assemblies for ground laboratory and space experiments as well as for

industrial, commercial and biomedical spin-off applications. Analysis and reporting of test results

is also included in the scope of this task. In addition, the task may require miscellaneous small

hardware purchases in order to complete task deliverables.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

  New for AFP7 8/14/09; changed estimated period of performance from "04/01/2009-

03/31/2010" to "10/01/2009-9/30/2010" ** ***

Period of Performance: 10/01/2009-9/30/2010

Broad Scope of Work:

***********NEW AS OF AFP6 4/01/09; Removed "fabrication" in first sentence and in both

item 1 under Electrical and item 1 under Mechanical as this is no longer

needed******************* 

Activities include the design, development, acquisition, assembly, checkout and operation of test

facilities and experiment assemblies for ground laboratory and space experiments as well as for

industrial, commercial and biomedical spin-off applications. Analysis and reporting of test results

is also included in the scope of this task.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/019.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Specific Work Elements:

Electrical and electronics research and technology support for activities including:

1. Design, development, acquisition, assembly, checkout and operation of electrical and electrical

aspects of test facilities, target and sample manipulator systems, ground based and space

experiments as well as spin-off applications supported and operated by the Space Environment

and Experiments Branch for various projects.

2. Design and coordination of build up or alterations to electrical/electronic portions of test

hardware.

3. Conduct tests, gather and analyze data and report preparation for tests supported by the Space

Environment and Experiments Branch.

4. Proposal preparation related to electrical/electronics support for cooperative agreements with

other organizations and agencies for development, transfer, and testing of technologies advocated

by the Space Environment and Experiments Branch.

Mechanical research and technology support for activities including:

1. Design, development, acquisition, assembly, checkout and coordination of mechanical aspects

of test facilities, sample and target manipulator systems, ground based and space experiments as

well as spin-off applications supported and operated by the Space Environment and Experiments

Branch for various test programs.

2. Design and coordination of build up or alterations to the mechanical portion of test hardware.

3. Conduct tests, gather and analyze data and report preparation for tests supported by the Space

Environment and Experiments Branch.

4. Proposal preparation related to mechanical research and technology support for cooperative

agreements with other organizations and agencies for development, transfer, and testing of

technologies advocated by the Space Environment and Experiments Branch.

Travel requirements will be determined as required

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones: 

1. Automate adhesion rig feedthrough by January 31, 2010 (electrical support)

2. Support efforts to develop ground laboratory facilities and experiments as well as space

experiments for:

- Durability evaluation of polymers and thermal control coatings for exploration missions

- Lunar dust durable radiators

- Sputtered and evaporated coatings 

- Sputter etched and atomic oxygen textured surface modifications 

- Environmentally durable seals for exploration missions

- Support proposal efforts to develop facilities and experiments to be conducted by the Space
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/019.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Environment and Experiments Branch by March 31, 2010.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior mechanical engineering support with experience in mechanism design, vacuum systems

and plasma generating systems.

Electrical engineering support with experience in vacuum and plasma generating systems, control

and data acquisition systems, and programming will be assigned to this task.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/020.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Manzo, Michelle

Task Number: NNC06E020T - 13

Task Title: Advanced Battery Development and Evaluation

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Advanced battery technologies are required for future NASA Exploration missions.

Improvements to the specific energy, energy density and safety are needed to meet

EVA (extravehicular activities), Altair Lunar Lander and Lunar surface Systems customer

performance metrics. NASA is developing advanced components and cells as part of the

next generation of batteries for these lunar exploration missions. The successful

development of these advanced technologies will also have significant impact on

commercial and terrestrial applications.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Cell Development - Development and implementation of test approaches and procedures

for the evaluation of cell components for advanced secondary Li-ion battery systems.

Development of advanced components for lithium-ion batteries. Development and

maintenance of a model used to predict cell characteristics. 

1. Characterization 

Characterize and determine electrochemical performance of candidate anodes, cathodes,

and electrolytes developed in-house and by NRA and SBIR contractors. The

characterized materials shall be evaluated for their applicability to meeting the overall

goals for the advanced battery systems. 

2. Development of Advanced Battery Cell Components

Provide definition and support to the development of alternative anodes and separators

for advanced Li based cells. Silicon-based anodes with the potential to exceed 1000

mah/g are of particular interest.

3. Demonstrate functioning of candidate electrodes and electrolytes in a cell

configuration.

Prepare full-cells using representative cathodes, anodes and electrolytes. Develop

methods for component and cell fabrication. Evaluate performance of full cells - at a

minimum; determine capacity, efficiency, cycle ability, and specific capacity/energy.

4. Li-Ion Cell Model

Maintain excel based modes used to predict cell characteristics that include specific

energy, energy density, mass, volume, energy ... as a function of materials and design

features

Li-Ion Test and Evaluation
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/020.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Cell and Battery Test Support

Provide support to validation verification efforts that ensure the readiness of advanced

battery technologies to flight applications. Develop and execute test plans that validate

performance characteristics for NASA mission applications. Provide overall coordination

and scheduling of NASA battery test facilities.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Cell Development - Development and implementation of test approaches and procedures

for the evaluation of cell components for advanced secondary Li-ion battery systems.

Development of advanced components for lithium-ion batteries. Development and

maintenance of a model used to predict cell characteristics. 

1. Characterization 

Characterize and determine electrochemical performance of candidate anodes, cathodes,

and electrolytes developed in-house and by NRA and SBIR contractors. The

characterized materials shall be evaluated for their applicability to meeting the overall

goals for the advanced battery systems. 

2. Development of Advanced Battery Cell Components

Provide definition and support to the development of alternative anodes and separators

for advanced Li based cells. Silicon-based anodes with the potential to exceed 1000

mah/g are of particular interest.

3. Demonstrate functioning of candidate electrodes and electrolytes in a cell

configuration.

Prepare full-cells using representative cathodes, anodes and electrolytes. Develop

methods for component and cell fabrication. Evaluate performance of full cells - at a

minimum; determine capacity, efficiency, cycle ability, and specific capacity/energy.

4. Li-Ion Cell Model

Maintain excel based modes used to predict cell characteristics that include specific

energy, energy density, mass, volume, energy ... as a function of materials and design

features

Li-Ion Test and Evaluation - Cell and Battery Test Support

Provide support to validation verification efforts that ensure the readiness of advanced

battery technologies to flight applications. Develop and execute test plans that validate

performance characteristics for NASA mission applications. Provide overall coordination

and scheduling of NASA battery test facilities.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Cell Development Support

Development Milestone 1 - 

Complete report summarizing KPP assessments on anode and separator materials

developed in-house and via contracted NRA efforts - component characteristics (Batch 2

reports complete by 1/29/10) per test procedures previously established 

Development Milestone 2 – 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/020.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Contribute to evaluation of next generation high capacity cathodes, advanced

electrolytes and safety devices. Provide input to respective leads at JPL and JSC. As

needed – complete of evaluation of round 2 NRA and in-house deliverables by 1/29/10. 

Development Milestone 3 - 

Support trade studies with comparative projections of cell characteristics using ETDP

developed materials and cell design parameters. Provide review and comparison with

Saft Trade studies - (Saft submission 11/24/09) - review and comparison due 12/24/09

Cell Testing

Testing Milestone 1. 

Establish and maintain master test schedule that documents overall test capability and

the assignment and distribution of test articles and the scheduling of the required tests.

(Maintain as needed - at a minimum provide monthly updates)

Testing Milestone 2. 

Identify and obtain candidate commercial cells that offer high specific energy and

energy density and other performance characteristics targeted in the Exploration

Technology Development Energy Storage Project Battery Development effort. Evaluate

cells against ETDP goals via test plans previously established - complete interim test

report by February 15, 2009.

Report should include a complete survey of products of interest that have been identified

as well as test results on cells that have been obtained and evaluated.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior engineering or scientific support with a background in battery technology and

chemical laboratory experience will be assigned to this task.

Experience with Arbin Test equipment and the testing Li-ion cells and batteries.

Limited administrative support may be required.

Government Furnished Property

Facilities and materials needed for evaluations.

Safety and Assurance Plans
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/020.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/022.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Technical Representative: Liu, Nan-Suey

Task Number: NNC06E022T - 11

Task Title: Three-D Combustor Flow Code Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 35.

BACKGROUND: Computer codes currently used by aerospace industries for gas turbine

combustor analysis are based on methodologies, algorithms, and models developed over twenty

years ago. New 3-D codes are being developed which take advantages of the progress made

during the intervening time in such areas as algorithms, submodels, and computational

technologies. A new combustion code that NASA GRC has played a key role in developing is the

National Combustion Code (NCC) for unstructured grids. This task order encompasses work on

the code to enhance it, to validate it, and to ensure that the physical modeling and mathematical

algorithms are as consistent as possible and to clearly define the relative merits of the code. This

improved tool will be made available to the aeropropulsion industry and will also directly impact

NASA technology programs.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: Develop advanced numerical algorithms for 3-D combustor

configurations, develop advanced numerical treatments of finite-rate chemical reactions, develop

advanced spray models including the fuel atomization,and incorporate these into 3-D reacting

flow codes.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

Develop advanced numerical algorithms for 3-D combustor configurations, develop advanced

numerical treatments of finite-rate chemical reactions, develop advanced spray models including

the fuel atomization, and incorporate these into 3-D reacting flow codes.

*******New for AFP7

Specific Work Elements: 

1. Implement JP8 properties into the NCC. (Completion by 11/30/2009)

2. Integrate UTRC/UMASS atomization and vaporization models into NCC and verify the

implementation (Completion by 3/31/2010)

3. Assist NCC team members to conduct their validation calculations of NCC ( as required)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/022.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:07 AM]

Quality Assurance:

The contractor shall submit Technical Progress and Resource Management Reports for this task

monthly. Progress reviews will be conducted regularly with the cognizant NASA TR. Any

revisions to the above schedule that may result from these reviews will be jointly agreed upon by

the TR and the contractor supervisor.

Travel as required

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

******* New for AFP7

Specific Work Elements and Milestones :

1. Implement JP8 properties into the NCC. (Completion by 11/30/2009)

2. Integrate UTRC/UMASS atomization and vaporization models into NCC and verify the

implementation (Completion by 3/31/2010)

3. Assist NCC team members to conduct their validation calculations of NCC ( as required)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

Ph.D. in Mechanical/Aeronautical Engineering with extensive experience in computational fluid

mechanics of combustion. Experience in multi-dimensional CFD code development including real

gas and non-equilibrium (i.e. combustion) effects as well as sprays and turbulence.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY: 

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/023.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Simon, Donald

Task Number: NNC06E023T - 12

Task Title: Integrated Diagnostics and Controls for Enhanced Safety

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/6/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

A high priority area of research at the NASA Glenn Research Center is engine gas path

health management being conducted under the NASA Aviation Safety Program

Integrated Vehicle Health Management Project.

For the NASA Aviation Safety Program, the broad objectives of this task are to develop

and demonstrate health management technologies to detect and isolate safety

significant propulsion malfunctions. This will include developing engine fault models, and

algorithms to detect and isolate (diagnose) malfunctions. A promising area for safety

enhancement on large subsonic turbine engines is Model-Based Diagnostics. Work will be

done to develop estimation logic (tracking filters) to tune associated component level

model (CLM) of the engine embedded in engine control logic. Work will also be done to

develop and demonstrate safety enhancing fault detection and isolation logic that utilizes

tuned CLM outputs.

Contractor personnel shall be responsible for the science aspects of experiments. High

levels of both technical and interpersonal skills are required as there are frequent

interactions with other investigators and other portions of the Glenn laboratory.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The task involves the research and development of techniques for engine fault detection,

isolation, and avoidance. The goals are 1) demonstrate fault detection and isolation

techniques, given a suite of engine sensors and actuators, and 2) identify beneficial

improvements in models and instrumentation to enhance these techniques.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

General Scope of Work 

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: October 1, 2009 to Completion

of GESS-2 Contract. Base plus 3 Options******

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/023.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

The broad objective of this task is to develop and demonstrate health management

technologies to detect and isolate safety significant propulsion malfunctions. This will

include developing engine fault models, and algorithms to predict or detect

malfunctions.

Specific Work Elements:

1. Analyze propulsion system component interrelationships in the presence of safety

significant component degradations and faults, using suitable gas turbine engine

aerothermal models. This analysis will encompass quasi-steady-state, transient, and

dynamic operation for the engine model, and will require some fault model development.

2. Design and evaluate aircraft engine gas path diagnostic systems capable of trending

and estimating engine performance parameters; and detecting and isolating engine

malfunctions. 

3. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at Technical and/or technology

transfer meetings, presentations of research papers, and in acquiring training or course

work useful for enhancing capabilities in performing task.

*******NEW AS OF AFP7 – October 1, 2009 (ds)************************

3a. Attend the training course, “Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Condition-Based

Maintenance: A Practical Course on Designing, Developing, and Implementing

Automated Health Management Systems,” sponsored by Impact Technologies and to be

held in Long Beach, CA, January 19-21, 2010.

*******************************************************************

4. Provide written documentation of technical work. Present work at appropriate

meetings and conferences.

5. Clearly communicate progress and issues in a timeframe and manner commensurate

with their impact.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

a. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific

projects.

b. Technical achievements or issues 

*******NEW AS OF AFP7 – October 1, 2009 (ds)***********************

2. The contractor shall evaluate and compare aircraft engine thrust estimation

techniques applied to the C-MAPSS engine model. These simulation evaluations shall

include transient flight profiles, engine deterioration, and varying environmental

conditions. The estimation techniques to be evaluated shall include an interpolation

model approach previously developed by the contractor, and linear Kalman filter

estimation approaches. The contractor shall deliver to NASA the developed software,

associated documentation, and a summary of the thrust estimation accuracy results.

Due by 3/31/2010.

3. The contractor shall initiate the development of an on-line aircraft engine gas path

performance deterioration trend monitoring approach. This work shall be conducted in
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/023.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

simulation and applied to the C-MAPSS engine model. Document and report findings to

NASA. 

*******************************************************************

Performance based task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of

evaluating task performance according to predetermined measurables. Revisions, if

required, to the above performance based deliverables will be tracked via monthly

reports and modifications will be jointly agreed upon by the Task Manager and the TR as

they relate to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE:

The task requires Master's Degree level expertise with experience in flight controls,

control theory, simulation, and experimental design.

Government Furnished Property

Individual Mathworks Matlab software license for a PC

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/024.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Freeman, Carmela

Task Number: NNC06E024T - 14

Task Title: Drawing Management and Configuration Control Support.

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 42.

BACKGROUND: The Code F Business Management Office (FB) will provide oversight of the

electronic document storage system used by various facilites groups in the Facilities and Test

Directorate. In addition this office will provide the coordination required for the facilities change

request process as described in GLP-FB-8820.1 Configuration Control of Facilities.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: The contractor shall provide support for the management of

drawings which will include the day-to-day operation and management of the electronic

document management system (Adept). Support shall also be provided to manage the

configuration change control process. The Contractor shall provide support and direction in the

creation, storage, recovery, and reproduction of electronic copies of engineering drawings.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The following support shall be provided to the Business Management Office:

Management of drawings which will include the day-to-day operation and oversight of the

electronic document management system (Adept), operation and maintenace of the Glenn

Drawings Information System (GDIS),provide support for facilities engineering drawings

retrieval or assistance,and maintain the Web pages for the drawings related areas.

Support the Facility Managers, Central Process Systems Managers, the Institutional Systems

Managers and the Document Administators for FD and FT by managing the Change Control

process described in BMS document 8820.1.

Personnel assigned to this task may be required to move electronic or hardcopy files of restricted

or proprietary drawings or documents. As such they should have suitable clearances to work with

or around these materials. No secret documents or drawings shall be covered by this task and

clearances to that level are not required. 

Provide guidance, recommendations and implementation strategies relative to requested

modifications to the GDIS, FEDMS (Adept) and how changes to the Process Systems Database
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/024.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

managed by others may affect GDIS performance. 

Support shall include making additions and corrections to data elements within the GDIS and

performing a QA check to insure that the information link between the drawings, components and

change request records are accurate and up to date.

Produce scanned files of electronic drawings to produce aperture cards. Submit the electronic file

to the appropriate document management systems. Prepare and submit services performed and

production reports.

Maintain NASA reproduction hardware (plotter, copiers, computers, and specialized equipment),

to include oversight of maintenance agreements.

Issue NASA standard numbers to be attached to engineering files for filing purposes.

Maintain archived engineer documents.

Analyze and research unusual engineering customer requests when sufficient data is not available

for routine processing. Validate engineering requiests for drawing information. Perform database

searches for drawings based on content, organization, or project supported. Correct drawing

document deficiency to preculde recurrence.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include: A monthly report detailing the

breakdown of hours by project or area supported along with a financial report with total hours

and dollars used to date and cumulative by month.

Quarterly reports listing:

Facility Change Requests completed

Facility Change Requests in process

BMS Change Requests completed

BMS Change Requests in process

Summary of drawing activity for the division

Progress of uploading as-built backlog

Number of database records updated/changed

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/024.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Experience with Adept system (or other comparable drawing management systems). Experience

with GDIS and the Center's change control process.

The contractor shall provide personnel who have the skill and knowledge base to support the

requirements as a team and provide back-up or additional suport within this task.

Government Furnished Property

Facilities Engineering Division's Synergis/Adept drawing management software, electronic

drawing files and servers. 

Facilities Configuration Program change request records.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/026.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Schreiber, Jeffrey

Task Number: NNC06E026T - 10

Task Title: EMC, Design and Analysis for Stirling Engine

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Stirling Engine and linear alternator technology development is being completed for transition to

formal flight development. The prototypes have to be designed and tested to the flight

requirements that include long life, high performance, structural, EMI/EMC. This technology has

been chosen by NASA and DOE for development as an alternative to the less efficient RTGs.

This task requires engineering support so that the Stirling generator will meet the stringent

requirements in terms of EMI, launch vibration, long life, high reliability, and manufacturability.

** End of Updated Background Statement **

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide review and consultation to support the design evaluation, recommend

modification, and advise on advanced concepts, including measurements of developmental

Stirling power systems. Develop EMI/EMC reduction strategies and facilitate EMI/EMC testing

as required. Support documentation of the design and test activities.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide review and consultation to the NASA GRC project office in support

of concept development and evaluation, facilitate the EMI/EMC design effort, mechanical design

& structural analysis, in-house test efforts in support of Stirling radioisotope power conversion.

The contractor shall support tests of Stirling cycle machines at GRC as requested.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include:

1. By October 30, 2009, develop conceptual design for mechanical hardware for ASC-E3 test.

2. By November 30, 2009, complete design of hardware needed for Durability Testing of ASC-E2

convertors.

3. By January 31, 2010, complete fit check of hardware for testing of ASC-E3 convertors.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/026.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

4. By March 31, 2010, support development of the design documentation of the ASC-E3 the

through the GRC Engineering Review Board process.

5. By March 31, 2010, support preparation for the ASC-E3 Production Readiness Review.

6. By March 31, 2010, support extended operation testing of Stirling converters by monitoring

purity of working fluid, and consulting on gas analysis techniques.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Flight EMI experience, test development and operation, technical documentation.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/029.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Loyselle, Patricia

Task Number: NNC06E029T - 20

Task Title: Power Systems for Aerospace Applications

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 69.

Fuel cells have the potential to be efficient, environmentally benign, lightweight, of low cost, and

durable. They are also capable of operating on multiple fuel types. For this task, fuel cells and

accompanying ancillary components must be designed and evaluated to maximize performance

while minimizing mass and volume. Successful demonstrations of sub-scale fuel cell systems are

also of immediate interest to NASA; hence, the purpose of this effort is to identify, develop and

characterize pertinent fuel cell technology and to demonstrate the operational benefits of fuel cells

for aircraft and exploration applications.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide technology development to achieve, develop and evaluate fuel cells,

ancillary components and powerplants for NASA's future exploration missions as well as reduced

emissions aircraft operations.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Candidate fuel cell technologies must be identified and assessed for suitability to exploration and

aeronautics applications. Technologies and fuel cell types must be assessed for further

consideration, including analyses of fuel cell systems and experimental testing. The analyses shall

include performance estimates subject to mission requirements. These systems may be standalone fuel cells or they may be hybrid energy conversion technologies. The optimum

configurations must then be recommended for the specific missions. The subject assessment,

analyses, and laboratory efforts are to be performed in collaboration with RPC/Electrochemistry

Branch technical staff and other team members.

Specific Work Elements are as follows:

1. Fuel Cell Technology Assessment: Starting with the known requirements description furnished

by NASA, the technology development status of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells,

solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and other technologies must be assessed. The assessment must

conclude with recommendations for which type(s) of fuel cell technology should be considered

for the project and future follow-on projects and which fuel cell stack suppliers should be
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/029.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

considered for this effort.

2. System Analyses: The performance characteristics of the selected fuel cell types must be

estimated in order to aid in assessing the feasibility of those systems for future aircraft and

exploration use. The operating efficiencies, transient capabilities, and emissions must be

quantified to the greatest extent possible. In addition, an approximation of the ancillary subsystem

requirements must be completed. Performance limitations must also be identified.

3. Experimental Fuel Cell Characterization: Testing of selected fuel cell technologies must be

conducted. In conjunction with NASA GRC technical staff, operating manuals must be devised

and full safety measures must be taken into account. Fuel cell characterization will be required

for various proton exchange membrane and solid oxide fuel cell test programs. The contractor

must generate operating procedures, check sheets, and serve as a qualified operator for testing of

fuel cell power plants and stacks. The contractor must lead the effort for the selection,

incorporation and evaluation of fuel cell based systems into various vehicle configurations. The

contractor must provide support to run a series of characterization tests on fuel cell stacks,

ancillary components and powerplants and monitor performance over each individual condition.

The contractor will report the outcome of these tests and provide recommendations for further

research and development.

Contractor shall purchase Hardware and software in support of the program.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Technical monthly progress reports that summarize work performed during the performance

period.

2. Complete analysis and evaluation of data collected during tests of fuel cells under various

levels of helium. (Due: 3/31/10)

3. Provide test report summarizing the results of tests conducted under the Propellant Scavenging

Program including potential power system design options for optimal performance. (Due:

3/31/10)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Chemist or Chemical Engineer with extensive experience in electrochemistry, the development

and evaluation of electrochemistry, fuel cell systems, components and test facilities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/029.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/030.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Guo, Ten-huei

Task Number: NNC06E030T - 14

Task Title: Design, Implementation & Testing of Advanced Control Systems for

Aerospace Propulsion

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/5/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Control and Dynamics Technology Branch at NASA Glenn Research Center is tasked

with developing, implementing and, validating advanced control systems for future

aerospace propulsion systems. The branch currently has research activities focused on

developing a variety of control and health management technologies for air and space

systems. This task will provide controls and dynamic modeling expertise in support of

the work conducted by the branch. The effort will result in the successful design,

implementation, and demonstration of advanced control systems and dynamic modeling

technologies.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task will procure the engineering design, implementation and testing services

required to develop advanced control systems that are enabling technologies for air and

space propulsion systems. This task is to support the Integrated Resilient Aircraft

Control project under Aviation Safety Program. During this reporting period, the task will

primarily focus on the development and implementation of realistic aircraft engine

simulation and controller design for large commercial airplanes. This task will also

perform the software maintenance for the integration for the engine simulation software

developed from other group.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to Completion of

GESS-2 Contract. Base plus 3 Options******

Broad Scope of Work:

Primary duties include control requirements definition, selection of appropriate control

strategies, and design, development, and implementation of control laws for targeted

aerospace propulsion systems and subsystems. Duties may also include some support

for planning activities, simulation development to support control design efforts, software

maintenance, documentation, and implementation and validation testing of control

algorithms in simulation, ground test, and/or flight test environments.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/030.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Specific Work Elements:

*************************************

1. Support the development, implementation, and distribution of a closed-loop, generic

commercial gas turbine engine simulation in support of the Aviation Safety projects.

1a. Develop tools to assist with the comparison and validation of component models for

the C-MAPSS2 (Commercial Modular Aircraft Propulsion System Simulation-2) engine

simulation.

1b. Select and implement an appropriate solver strategy for C-MAPSS2

1c. Develop and implement GUI (Graphic User Interface) and API (Application

Programming Interface) for C-MAPSS2

1d. Develop generic engine controller for fast response engine research.

1e. Develop simulations for high level control architecture for fast response engine to

demonstrate the information flow and risk propagation.

1f. Prepare and update the user’s guide for C-MAPSS2 software package.

***********************************

2. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical and/or technology

transfer meetings, presentations or research papers, and in acquiring training or course

work useful for enhancing capabilities in performing this task.

3. Obtain training as required to conduct research being performed under this task and

maintain core competency in control systems design and analysis.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES:

*****************************************

1. The contractor shall complete baseline controller (Power management and limit logics)

for C-MAPSS2 engine model to match the characteristics of the SOAPP (State of Art

Propulsion Program) model by December 31st, 2009.

2. The contractor shall complete baseline C-MAPSS2 engine simulation to include stall

margin models and develop a stall margin estimation algorithm based on available

sensor set by December 31st, 2009. 

3. The contractor shall develop a GUI for C-MAPSS2 for public release by March 31st,

2010.

*******************************************

Deliverables: 

********************************************

1. Documentation for the C-MAPSS2 baseline controller performance comparing to

SOAPP model. Due by December 31st, 2009. 

2. Document for stall margin model and stall margine estimation algorithm C-MAPSS2.

Due by December 31st, 2009. 

3. Draft paper for stall margin model and margin estimation algorithm. Due by March

31st, 2010.

Monthly progress reports shall be submitted which describe technical achievement,

issues, developments, progress, analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects. 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

************************************************

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/030.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

This task requires the support of personnel with an advanced degree in a field related to

controls engineering (e.g., aerospace, mechanical, or electrical) and a broad background

in the development, implementation, testing, and validation of control algorithms. “Broad

background” implies a practical understanding of classical, modern, and intelligent

control-based approaches. Some familiarity with real-time implementation of controls is

also required. Proficiency in Matlab and Simulink is also required.

Contractor personnel shall be responsible for the science aspects of experiments. High

technical and interpersonal and skills are required as there are frequent interactions with

other research and administrative personnel at NASA Glenn.

Government Furnished Property

NASA Glenn Engine Simulation Lab. Matlab software package.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/031.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Heidmann, James

Task Number: NNC06E031T - 12

Task Title: Experimental and Computation Investigation of Turbine Aerodynamics

& Heat Transfer

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/12/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 79.

BACKGROUND: 

Gas turbine efficiency is increased by improved ability to predict turbine aerodynamics

and heat transfer. To verify predictions highly detailed data are needed. These data are

best obtained in research facilities. In addition to decreased costs due to improved

efficiency, emissions are also reduced. The CW22 facility is unique cascade facility, which

is able to test large scale turbine blade at very high Mach numbers. The data are used

to verify analyses developed at Glenn to predict the aerodynamics and heat transfer.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Acquire experimental data and conduct simulations of turbine aerodynamics and heat

transfer to improve CFD predictive capability.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

**Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to 8/31/2011***

Broad Scope of Work:

Acquire experimental data and conduct numerical simulations of turbine aerodynamics

and heat transfer to improve CFD predictive capability.

Specific Work Elements:

1. Provide guidance regarding the research requirements for a turbine test facility. This

is done to ensure that highly accurate and detailed measurements can be obtained in

this facility.

2. Provide guidance for tests to evaluate the effects of tip clearance on heat transfer and

aerodynamic performance 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/031.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Travel to GE (2)

Approximate cost $1000

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Provide experimental dataset for aerodynamic and heat transfer effects of turbine tip

clearance flows in CW22 (transonic turbine cascade) facility.

2. Ensure that CW22 facility is operable with respect to pressure certification issues.

3. Work with NASA personnel to compare experimental results with existing CFD data

and generate research report of results.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

Ph.D. in Aerospace or Mechanical engineering. Experience in experimental data

acquisition and numerical simulation of surface heat transfer.

Government Furnished Property

No government furnished property is required, but the experimental work is to be

performed in the CW-22 test cell. Computational work is to be performed on both

government owned and contractor owned computer systems. The computational work

may require the use of the NASA facility or Glenn multiprocessor computer system.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/033.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

Technical Representative: Okojie, Robert

Task Number: NNC06E033T - 10

Task Title: Surface Analysis Task

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 86.

Background: The Sensors and Electronics Technology Branch conducts research and development

programs in sensing concepts, sensor technology, high temperature electronics and related areas

such as materials and materials processing techniques. Emphasis is on developing advanced

capabilities for measurement and control of aeropropulsion systems. Specific areas of work

include thin film and wire thermocouples and strain gages, remote temperature sensors, heat flux

gages, chemical species sensors, SiC based electronic devices and sensors, and MEMS. The

branch is equipped to fabricate the sensors and electronic devices including crystal growth

facilities, clean rooms for device fabrication, and facilities for test and evaluation of the sensors

and devices. This area of research needs state-of-the-art surface analysis capabilities in order to

determine the behavior of these devices during fabrication and operation.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: Perform surface analysis and characterization in support of

research programs of the Instrumentation and Controls Division at NASA Glenn Research

Center.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide surface analysis and characterization for the Instrumentation and

Controls division as required. This work shall include the analysis of samples using Scanning

Electron Microscopy, Auger Electron Spectroscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, and X-ray

Photoelectron Spectroscopy.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects,

including ASG Database output.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/033.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:08 AM]

B. Technical achievements or issues.

2. Supply computer software or hardware or miscellaneous equipment as needed for task.

Task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measure. Revisions, if required to the above deliverables will be

tracked via monthly reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 25

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor shall provide support qualified and experienced in the use of Auger Spectroscopy,

Scanning Electron Microscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, and X-Ray Electron Microscopy.

Government Furnished Property

The government will provide on a non-interference basis: Scanning Electron Microscopy, Auger

Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, and X-Ray Electron

Microscopy.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/034.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Hull, David

Task Number: NNC06E034T - 23

Task Title: Analytical Science Lab Operations

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/12/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009 *******

Background: 

The Structures and Materials Division (RX00) at NASA Glenn Research Center is involved in

research and development of high temperature materials for use in aerospace propulsion systems.

Understanding the behavior of these materials requires complete materials characterization by

several techniques. These techniques are implemented in the Advanced Metallics Branch,

Structures and Materials Division. The materials characterization requires special knowledge,

skills, and laboratory capabilities to prepare specimens properly, examine, and record the results.

The contractor has been involved in conducting preparation and characterization of materials and

has the special skills required to conduct this task.

Broad Scope of Work:

The objective of this task is to provide materials characterization services for research programs

in GRC's Structures and Materials Division. Material Characterization support is required for the

characterization of metals, ceramics, polymers and composites.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - August 20, 2009 *******

Shall provide metallographic services, materials characterization, and electron microscopy

services for research programs and technical support to the materials research effort in Materials

and Structures Division at NASA Glenn Research Center. Support for NASA Glenn and other

NASA centers and contractors may also be required.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009 *******

Government Estimated Period of Performance: April 2009 to Completion of GESS-2

Contract,Base puls 3 Options.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/034.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

The objective of this task is to provide materials characterization services for research programs

in NASA GRC's Structures and Materials Division(RX00). Material characterization support is

required for the characterization of metals, ceramics, polymers and composites.

General:

1. Shall perform sample preparation, conduct analysis, and report results. 

2. Shall maintain laboratory equipment, instrumentation, and supplies necessary to insure precise

and accurate analyses in a timely manner. Shall perform routine calibration and maintenance on

equipment. Shall notify government personnel of impediments in performing analysis. 

3. Shall provide consultation to research staff as to the most appropriate analytical techniques.

4. Shall maintain awareness of 'state of the art' analytical instrumentation, techniques, computer

hardware, and software for analytical applications. Shall specify and make recommendations for

the procurement of new equipment and/or upgrades.

5. Shall provide concise operational procedures, and instruct/train research staff on the use and

operation of equipment.

6. Shall utilize computer software tools to measure, and perform statistical analysis for enhanced

record keeping.

7. Shall practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories.

8. Shall travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical and/or technology transfer

meetings, presentations of research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful for

enhancing capabilities in performing the task.

9. Shall assist in decommissioning of analytical instrumentation in preparation for installation of

new or upgraded equipment.

10. Shall perform analysis following ISO 9001 instructions.

Specific:

A. Metallographic Laboratory: 

1. Shall mount, polish, and etch specimens for microstructural examination. Shall document

results using optical microscopy techniques, and interpret results. 

2. Shall provide precision machining of flat samples to surface finishes of less than one micron.

3. Shall assist in performing micro-hardness testing and image analysis.

4. Shall maintain records of material preparation guidelines (MPG's).

B. Electron Microscopy Laboratory: 

1. Shall prepare and analyze samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), x-ray energy

dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD), and electron

microprobe analysis using wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS).

2. Shall perform fractographic analysis of failed test samples.

3. Shall perform microchemical characterization on metallographic samples.

4. Shall perform calibration/maintenance on SEMs, XEDS, EBSD, microprobe, and sputter/carbon
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/034.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

coaters.

5. Shall provide nickel plating of samples prior to metallography for samples requiring analysis to

a sample's edge.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects,

including Analytical Science Group Database output.

B. Technical achievements or issues.

2. Supply computer software or hardware or miscellaneous equipment as needed for task.

Task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measure. Revisions, if required to the above, deliverables will be

tracked via monthly reports and modifications will be jointly agreed upon by the Task Manager

and the TR as they relate to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009 *******

The contractor shall provide the necessary personnel required for each of the two subtask areas

making up this task.

1. The Metallography Laboratory requires metallographer specialist personnel with the following

qualifications:

a)Associates degree in Chemistry or Materials Science and/or 5 years or more of metallographic

experience. This experience will include a minimum of 5 years conducting metallography on

metal, ceramic, polymers, and composite materials. Also, experience in plasma etching,

interference layering, optical microscopy and digital imaging.

2. The electron microscopy laboratory requires:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/034.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

a) Electron microscopy personnel with greater than 10+ years extensive experience. Shall be

experienced in working with metals, intermetallics, ceramics, fibers and composites with

particular capabilities in fractography of ceramic fibers for reinforcing composites. Shall be

capable of SEM characterization and analysis of materials including imaging and chemical

characterization via XEDS and WDS techniques. Shall have a minimum of 5 years experience

operating a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM)with thorough understanding

of all operating parameters to obtain optimum performance. Shall be experienced in maintaining

such equipment and in preparing samples via coating techniques such as physical vapor

deposition. Shall have a minimum of 5 years experience in electron microprobe microanalytical

chemical analysis. 

Limited administrative and supervisory support is required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009 *******

On-site materials characterization laboratories. Metallographic laboratory in building 49 rooms

141, 146, 148, and 149. Electron optics laboratory in building 49 rooms 6-17, and 32.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/036.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Meador, Michael

Task Number: NNC06E036T - 39

Task Title: Chemical & Instrumental Analysis of Organic Compounds & Polymers

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Background:

The Polymers Branch of the NASA Glenn Research Center is involved in the development of

high performance polymers and polymer matrix composites for advanced aerospace propulsion,

power, and communications applications. This effort involves the synthesis, processing,

characterization, and evaluation of new materials. Timely and accurate chemical characterization

of these materials is critical to this effort. While many of the characterization techniques

employed are based upon known methods, these often need to be modified for use with advanced

materials. The contractor has been involved in conducting such chemical and instrumental

analysis of organic compounds and polymers.

Broad Scope of Work:

The objective of this task is to provide chemical analysis of organic compounds, polymers, and

polymer matrix composites using spectroscopic, chromatographic, thermal analytical, and

rheological techniques using instrumentation available in-house. The contractor shall also perform

routine maintenance and "trouble-shooting" of equipment, maintain the inventory of chemicals

and supplies, and make recommendations on the purchase of new analytical equipment plus

equipment and software upgrades.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide analytical support and service in Chemical and Physical Characterization of Monomers,

Oligomers, Polymers and Model Compounds

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

The objective of this task is to provide chemical analysis of organic compounds, polymers, and

polymer matrix composites using spectroscopic, chromatographic, thermal analytical, and

rheological techniques using instrumentation available in-house. The contractor shall also perform

routine maintenance and "trouble-shooting" of equipment, maintain the inventory of chemicals

and supplies, and make recommendations on the purchase of new analytical equipment plus

equipment and software upgrades.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/036.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

General:

1. Perform sample preparation, conduct analysis, and report results with documentation of

operating conditions, and calibration standards.

2. Maintain laboratory equipment, instrumentation, and supplies necessary to insure precise and

accurate analyses in a timely manner. Notify government personnel of impediments in performing

analysis. 

3. Provide consultation to research staff as to the most appropriate analytical techniques.

4. Maintain awareness of "state of the art" analytical instrumentation, techniques, computer

hardware, and software for analytical applications. Specify and make recommendations for the

procurement of new equipment or upgrades.

5. Modify existing methods and/or develop new techniques to analyze new advanced materials.

6. Utilize computer software tools to control measurement, perform statistical analysis, and

enhance record keeping.

7. Practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories.

8. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical and/or technology transfer

meetings, presentations of research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful for

enhancing capabilities in performing the task.

Specific:

1. Perform chemical analysis of samples provided by GRC scientists and engineers in response to

written work requests via any or all of the following techniques as required:

a. Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR and TGA-FTIR)

b. Raman spectroscopy

c. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy

d. Emission spectroscopy

e. HPLC (reverse phase, absorption, or gel permeation)

f. Thermal analysis (differential scanning calorimetry, thermal gravimetric analysis, thermal

mechanical analysis, and dynamic mechanical analysis)

g. Other techniques as required (e.g. viscosity and density measurements, rheological

measurements, resin/fiber content determinations, contact angle measurements, etc.)

h. Wet Chemistry Techniques

2. Report all data and pertinent information to the requesting scientist/engineer upon completion

of the test. Consult with requesting scientist/engineer on any special problems or difficulties

encountered in the analysis.

3. Develop and revise methodologies for evaluation of new materials.

4. Perform routine maintenance and calibration of chemical instrumentation, "trouble-shoot"

equipment when needed, promptly notify appropriate GRC personnel and contractor supervisor

when such instrumentation is in need of outside service, and make arrangements for outside

service.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/036.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

5. Make recommendations on the purchase of new analytical equipment, computer hardware and

software as well as equipment/software upgrades.

6. Maintain the Polymers Branch inventory and supply of laboratory chemicals and supplies.

Notify designated personnel when new chemicals/supplies should be ordered.

7. Travel in accordance with requirements for attendance at technical meetings, technology

transfer, making presentations of research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful

for enhancing performance of the task.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

1. A monthly activity report which summarizes task charges, production data, types of techniques,

and special achievements and issues.

2. Task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measure. Revisions, if required to the above performance based

deliverables will be tracked via quarterly progress report and modifications will be jointly agreed

upon by the Task Manager and the TR as they relate to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Milestones:

- Complete preliminary chemical and thermal analysis of polymeric materials (resins, composites,

adhesives) in support of the Advanced Composites Technology Project's preliminary resin and

composite screening program by 3/30/2010

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor shall provide competent support with a minimum of a ACS certified B.S. degree

in chemistry, and with research experience in organic and polymer chemistry. The task performer

will have experience with computers and instrumental methods of chemical analysis, mechanical

testing, chromatography, rheological property measurement, and polymer processing as well as a

reasonable degree of manual dexterity and good communication skills.

Limited supervisory support is required for this task.

Government Furnished Property
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/036.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Zalewski, Robert

Task Number: NNC06E037T - 13

Task Title: Engineering Directorate Technical Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 95.

The Engineering Directorate (ED)is a multi-disciplined organization that provides

engineering and manufacturing services to various customer organizations at the Glenn

Research Center. The ED relies upon a complex Engineering Support Environment to

accomplish its mission. The ED utilizes the contractor to maintain and operate this

environment.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: Provide technical support to the Code D/Engineering

Directorate.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Engineering Support Environment:

A) Support of all engineering/manufacturing based applications as required by ED

including client/server applications, client installation scripts, standalone client installs,

and engineering menus on the client desktop. The following list provided detailed

examples of the Engineering Applications to be supported, however, this list can and will

change as new Engineering Applications required to support the mission of ED become

available.

1. Applied Flow Technology – Arrow

2. Applied Flow Technology - Engineering Utility Suite

3. Applied Flow Technology - Fathom

4. Ansoft – Maxwell 2D

5. Ansoft - Maxwell 3D 

6. Ansys - Mechanical

7. Ansys – Connection for ProE 

8. FEMAP

9. Ansys - CFX-5

10. Autodesk – AutoCAD 

11. ESI Group – AutoSEA2

12. Computational Mechanics Group – BEASY
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

13. BETAsoft – Board

14. Cadence Design Systems – Allegro, PCB Design Studio, Affirma, 

15. Cadence Design Systems - OrCAD (Express, Layout, Layout Plus, Capture, Pspice)

16. COADE, Inc. – CAESAR II

17. COADE, Inc. - PVElite

18. ABZ - Design Flow Solutions

19. DEI - The Desktop Engineer 2000

20. Telelogic – DOORS, DOORSnet

21. Agile Software – DyRoBeS

22. EMA – MHARNESS

23. ADEPT

24. Express Metrix - Express Meter

25. Kamel Software - FastLook Plus

26. Macrovision Corporation – FLEXlm, SAMsuite

27. C&R Technologies – Sinda/Fluint, 

28. C&R Technologies – Thermal Desktop, 

29. C&R Technologies – FloCAD, 

30. C&R Technologies – RadCAD, 

31. C&R Technologies – SinapsPlus

32. EDAS – GageMapII

33. AeroSoft – GASP

34. Cryodata – GASPAK

35. Collier Research and Development Corporation - HyperSizer 

36. UGS– NX, 

37. UGS - I-deas

38. UGS – NX-Nastran

39. ORA – LightTools

40. PTC – Mathcad

41. Wolfram Research – Mathematica

42. The MathWorks – MATLAB, 

43. The MathWorks - Simulink

44. MSC.Software – MSC.Nastran, 

45. MSC.Software - MSC.Patran

46. BK – I-DEAS, Reporter

47. Media Cybernetics – OPTIMAS

48. Oracle – Oracle

49. Jasc Software - Paint Shop Pro

50. palmOne - Palm Desktop

51. PTC - Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire, 

52. PTC - Pro/PDM

53. UTS Software - TK Solver

54. NASA - TPSX Material Database

55. Spacedesign Corporation – TSS

56. Microsoft – Visual Basic, 

57. Microsoft - Visual C++

58. ZEMAX Development Corporation - ZEMAX

59. PTC - WindChill

60. Applications will be added or removed from this list as required by the current work

to be performed.

A-1.) The contractor shall create and maintain a software vendor database which

includes the following information for each application. The contractor shall input the

fields marked with an "*":

i) Name of Application and appropriate modules * (Gov't provided)

ii) Vendor info (Gov't provided)

(1) Vendor Name *
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

(2) URL link to vendor *

(3) Vendor point of contact, if available/required *

iii) NASA Contract Info (input provided by Gov't POC)

(1) Contract Number *

(2) NASA Buyer's name *

(3) Contract terms *

iv) Version info (Gov't provided)

(1) Version in production *

(2) Version in evaluation/test * as needed

(a) What's new in new version *

(b) expected release date to production *

(c) Date received *

(d) date installed *

(e) Number of licenses *

(f) Current Server location *

(g) License expiration date *

(h) Maintenance expiration date (Gov't provided) *

v) NASA Responsible person (provided by Gov't POC)

(1) name *

(2) phone *

(3) email *

vi) Special info (Gov't or Contractor provided, as needed) *

vii) flexLM, Operating system. *

A-2.) The contractor shall create and maintain a website where there is a web page for

each application. Information on web pages is a subset of them information contained in

the Microsoft Access database defined in above item.

A-3.) The Contractor shall prepare a summary of maintenance/upgrades performed on

applications during the previous month and those planned for the next 2 months. It is

anticipated that all software maintenances/upgrades will be installed within 30 days of

receipt and all new software applications will be installed within 60 days. Scheduling

issues will be discussed with the NASA TR.

A-4.) Provide an "able to Print" level of support for Engineering Applications.

A-5.) Problems to be addressed such that return to service within 8 work hours.

A-6.) Establish and maintain usage data for Server based applications: Number/Names

of Users for each application

A-7.) Data shall be available electronically with ad-hoc reports available within 8 work

hours of request.

A-8) Prepare procurement specifications for software purchases as requested.

B) Administer and assist in the customization and rework of CAD applications installation

and configuration. Customization includes the creation, upgrade, maintenance, and

documentation of the customization files. 

1. Pro/E

a) Support the creation, upgrade, and maintenance of the custom software configuration

files.

b) Install, administer, upgrade, and maintain PTC software.

c) Support the configuration of PTC products, to be functional in ED environment. 

d) Provide user support for PTC software related administrative issues.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

e) Set up and administer Pro/ENGINEER part libraries.

f) Document customizations and administrative information

2. UGS - NX

3. I-deas

4. AutoCAD

C) Support and maintain engineering architecture associated with engineering

applications. Administer and assist in the customization, installation, and configuration of

the Engineering Data Manager. Customization includes the creation, upgrade,

maintenance, and documentation. Support of the engineering architecture associated

with engineering applications. Support of the resource domain-engineering infrastructure

includes maintaining file/print/plotting services, SMS/SQL services, backup services,

intranet web services, UNIX connectivity, shared/public drives, HP blade and storage

technology and maintenance vendor support, and project shares.

C-1.) Contractor shall maintain a spreadsheet accessible to R. Zalewski and K.Spence

which includes the following information for ESD's non-ODIN computers, non-ODIN

monitors, Network Attached Devices (NADs), and available ODIN computers:

i) NASA Tag Number, Hardware Type, Manufacturer, Model Number, Size, CPU, Building,

and Room

ii) Provide EMAIL notification to R.Zalewski and K.Spence when any changes are made

to spreadsheet.

iii) Track Vendor Support hours.

C-2.) Contractor shall recommended hardware and/or software upgrade to the

engineering architecture and environment. Recommended changes in configuration to

optimize performance and utilization of environment resources

C-3) Provide diagnostics/trouble shooting and minor maintenance of hardware.

C-4) Prepare procurement specifications for hardware purchases.

C-5) Coordinate scheduling of installation.

C-6) Engineering Data Manager Support

i) Install, configure, and maintain Engineering Data Manager software on test,

development, and production servers. 

ii) Install, configure, and maintain Engineering Data Manager companion products

including viewers, and MCAD integrations.

iii) Develop, install, and maintain custom code and user interfaces to provide EDrequired customizations.

iv) Obtain training and services require to effect items a-c as approved.

D) Assist ODIN service providers to work problems that may arise within the ODIN

desktop environment when it effects engineering applications or related work. 

D-1) Engineering Help Desk / Problem Tracking

i) Provide help desk support for Engineering Applications.

ii) Use Web-based Problem Reporting and Tracking System. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

iii) Monthly Deliverable Notification via EMAIL TO Zalewski and SPENCE

1) Report Number of Problem Items Opened, Closed, In-Work.

iv) Develop user-help procedures and post on Support Center.

v) Expected engineering application help/problem response:

1) first response to user within 2 hours

2) problem assessment/estimate resolution within 8 hours

E) Perform system administration on desktop and server machines (non-ODIN

computers and Network Attached Devices (NADs)) as needed to enable engineering

applications or related work to be performed. This includes designated equipment used

in the ED Engineering Labs. Support non-ODIN peripheral hardware (printers, scanners,

projectors, shared systems, plotters, and switches) as necessary. 

F) Technical support including research, coordination, tracking and documentation for

the purpose of planning, facilitating and enhancing all ED engineering related operations.

(e.g., equipment database, newsletter/FAQ pages, software usage, committee support,

system administrator backup, technology and product review/enhancement, seminars,

demonstrations, user training/instruction, various organizational meeting support,

stock/purchase requests, computer supply distribution, H/W and S/W upgrades and the

development of computer related procedures and policies.) 

G) ED Web Page Development and Maintenance

G-1) Support 508 compliance testing for submitted pages

G-2) Acts as technical ED representative at GRC web development meetings

G-3) maintain ED site on external web pages

H.) Perform IT Security documentation development, updates as required by HSPD-12

and other Federal and Center mandates in coordination with the Code D Organization

Computer Security Official.

H-1) Maintain Security Plans currently in system for ED.

H-2) Support and create new plans and subplans as required by ED within the IT

Security System.

H-3) Maintain knowledge-base of current, changing, a new security regulations and

requirements of the Agency, Center, and Directorate.

I) Database Architecture and Management

Designs and maintains back-end databases (ie. MYSQL and Oracle) for Engineering

Applications, License Management, and Web presence.

I-1) Maintains FlexNet Manager for providing access to, monitoring, and reporting of

Engineering Application licenses.

I-2) Provides ad-hoc license reporting used to determine org/project usage for purpose

of assigning cost and shared funding.

I-3) Maintains Oracle database which back-ends Web-site development activities.

J) Application Data Administration

J-1) Processes User account requests provisioned through the IdMAX system for

applications such as GRC Windchill, DOORS, and additional applications as they become

available through IdMAX.

J-2) Creates PRODUCTS and PROJECTS for GRC Windchill, DOORS, and other application

involving database activity such as HyperSizer, Cradle, Genoa, and Subversion.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

• Maintenances/upgrades will be installed within 30 days of receipt.

• New software applications will be installed within 60 days.

• Monthly deliverable: report, which includes all requested information from the

Technical Summary section. Report due the following month.

• Monthly deliverable: Review and update database. Notification via EMAIL to 

B.Zalewski and K.Spence.

• Monthly deliverable: Review and update website. Maintain change log and notify via EMAIL to B.Zalewski and K.Spence

• Monthly deliverable: Maintenance/Upgrade/License renewal report covering previous

month and next two months via EMAIL to B. Zalewski and K.Spence.

• Monthly deliverable: Update and maintain engineering software database and report

changes to TR.

• Monthly Deliverable Notification via EMAIL TO ZALEWSKI and SPENCE. Report Number

of Problem Items Opened, Closed, In-Work from web based problem reporting and

tracking system.

• Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

The contractor is to provide appropriate technical staff. Personnel designated as system

administrators will be subject to Center defined security and qualification certification.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

For the period of performance, the Government will provide office space in Room 200B

of Building 86 to accommodate task. 

Applications furnished include all ED provided applications in order to support task.

Safety and Assurance Plans
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/037.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/038.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Naiman, Cynthia

Task Number: NNC06E038T - 13

Task Title: Parallel Processing Testbed H/W, S/W Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 3/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Code R of the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is conducting research to gain a fuller

understanding of internal and external flow phenomena associated with advanced aerospace

propulsion systems. That understanding is being built into improved analytical models and

numerical simulation codes that will be able to predict the physical behavior and performance of

new propulsion system designs. The research involves physical experiments, numerical

simulations, and analyses of inlets, compressors, turbines, nozzles, etc. for propulsion

applications. Code R supports the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate and the Exploration

Systems Mission Directorate in activities such as the Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization

(MDAO) capability and the Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) tool to further

enable propulsion and vehicle system analyses. 

Parallel processing is being used increasingly to perform both the analytical and experimental

computational work. This requires Code R to deal with a number of different parallel

architectures and the software that supports each.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Perform software development of tools and utilities to assist researchers with the implementation

and execution of parallel (CFD) and Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization (MDAO)

applications on HPCC and GRC distributed / parallel test-bed systems.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

******* NEW Government's Estimated Period Of Performance October 1, 2009 to March 31,

2011

The contractor shall perform software development of tools and utilities to assist researchers with

the implementation and execution of parallel (CFD) and MDAO applications on HPCC and GRC

distributed / parallel test-bed systems.

Specific Work Elements:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/038.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

The contractor shall:

1. Develop general software tools and utilities for enhancing the programming, implementation,

and execution of parallel applications, in areas such as computational steering, load balancing,

performance monitoring, debugging, etc. The software approach taken should consider possible

reuse of, or build on, available existing software and allow for easy porting to commercial

distributed/parallel systems.

2. Port selected serial (single processor) simulations to the distributed/parallel test bed systems as

required. Use portability tools in this process to allow the codes to be easily moved to

commercial distributed/parallel systems.

3. Support testing and/or enhancement of parallel/distributed software developed under other

NASA contracts and grants.

4. Develop and verify software for MDAO, concentrating on the infrastructure, varible fidelity,

and multi-discipline capabilities: including requirements definition, analysis, design,

implementation, documentation, and testing.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Develop application deployment mechanisms to support distributed multi-fidelity and multidiscipline numerical zooming system simulations. NEW*** 3/31/10

2. Develop software tools enabling full engine simulations on NAS supercomputer and local GX

cluster. Submit simulations and compare with cycle / experimental data. NEW*** 3/31/10

3. Develop MDAO framework capabilities. NEW*** 3/31/10

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 10

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

1. B.S. or M.S. in Electrical or Computer Engineering with at least 10 years experience in

systems programming, algorithm development, and parallel processing. Shall have knowledge of

the UNIX o/s, C programming. Shall also have several years experience with parallel processing

concepts (both software, e.g. message-passing libraries such as PVM and MPI, and hardware)

and general knowledge of FORTRAN, C++, CORBA, and python.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY: 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/038.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/039.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Lerch, Bradley

Task Number: NNC06E039T - 13

Task Title: Fatigue & Structures (FAST) Laboratory Testing Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

BACKGROUND: The FAST Laboratory was set up at NASA GRC to investigate elevated

temperature deformation and fatigue behavior in advanced materials under complex loading

conditions typical of gas turbine engine applications. Monolithic alloys and advanced polymer,

metal, and intermetallic matrix composites (PMCs, MMCs, and IMCs) are currently being

researched and evaluated with specific applications to several NASA programs.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: The work shall involve conducting experimental investigations

to characterize the deformation, damage, and life behaviors of advanced structural materials at

elevated temperatures, designing and fabricating custom fixtures to fit into existing test systems,

analyze test data, and completing other duties consistent with laboratory operations. Deliverables

shall include test results, quality assurance plans and equipment calibrations and documentation.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to Completion of GESS-2

Contract. Base plus 3 Options******

Scope of Work:

1. Prepare test specimens, which includes measuring specimen's size and density, polishing the

gauge surfaces, and instrumenting the specimen with thermocouple and strain gages.

2. Conduct tests on a wide variety of computer-controlled servohydraulic test systems. This

necessitates a knowledge of various test procedures and standards for conducting tensile, fatigue,

thermomechanical fatigue and bend tests on monolithic and composite materials. 

3. Install, calibrate and troubleshoot various heating systems associated with material test

systems. Employ the most appropriate temperature measurement system for each type of heating

and test material such as thermocouple and optical/laser pyrometery, and calibrates such systems.

4. Comply with all aspects of the laboratory quality assurance plan to calibrate and maintain all
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/039.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

testing and associated equipment. Assures that the quality assurance plan is maintained and

regularly updated. 

5. Align load frames per appropriate ASTM and NASA Fatigue Lab standards.

6. Understand the usage of, and install, calibrate and document thin film strain gages, resistance

extensometers and laser/optical extensometers for measuring displacements.

7. Participate in data reduction using personal computers and standard software.

8. Oversee machining operations of test specimens and fixtures.

9. Act as an informal liaison between engineers and fabrication personnel.

10. Perform other duties consistent with daily laboratory operations.

11. Maintain test rigs and central hydraulic and cooling water systems.

11. Training and/or continuing education courses as necessary to assist in performing the above

cited work elements. A limited amount of travel may be required.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables and Milestones: 

Deliverables:

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific 

projects.

B. Technical achievements or issues to include:

a) Technical progress in the various specific work elements cited and any special achievements

and/or new technologies developed in the process.

b) Information relating the details of installation, operation, and maintenance of laboratory

equipment

c) Number and description of work requests processed and associated response times.

d) An explanation of any down time, date, time duration, type of delay and reason, and the

resolution.

2. Computer hardware and software necessary for performing and maintaining the task work. This

may include a NASA GRC integrated desktop environment compatible personal computer, data

reduction software and software used for technical report writing.

3. Material supplies which will be used to maintain and upgrade existing, NASA tagged

equipment, which is directly related to Task performance. This will include:

i ) consumables such as filters, gaskets, seals and the like associated with test equipment,

ii) assemblies and components used to prepare test equipment for performance, and 

iii) internal upgrades to experimental equipment associated with completing Task Statements of

Work.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/039.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

4. Participate in weekly Lab Operations Meeting to discuss scheduling, ongoing work, problems

and ISO issues. Weekly submission of Progress sheets.

Milestones:

The milestones are many and may change weekly. They shall be provided by NASA on the

Progress sheets and discussed at the weekly Lab meeting.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 20

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

The task performer who will perform the work will have a minimum of 15 years or more of

related aerospace technology experience and will possess all required skills and knowledge to

fulfill all task duties. 

Limited supervisory support is required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

Quality Assurance Plan

System Safety Plan
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/042.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

Technical Representative: Lee, Chi-Ming

Task Number: NNC06E042T - 17

Task Title: Combustion Optics Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 111.

Nonintrusive instrumentation to investigate internal fluid dynamics and combustion

chemistry is critical to the development of advanced propulsion systems. Intrusive

instrumentation probes frequently cannot survive the test environment and adversely

affect the system or the measured parameter. Laser spectroscopy is one applicable

measurement area, which has been widely researched in the laboratory and which is

now being applied in aerospace research facilities. However, implementation of nonintrusive optical diagnostics directly into major combustor test hardware is limited by the

requirement to calibrate and test the techniques first on lab-scale hardware. Diagnostics

capabilities that have been demonstrat-ed at GRC will be reconfigured and implemented

in the Advanced Subsonic Combustor facility.

Broad Scope of Work:

The contractor shall develop nonintrusive, laser-based measurement systems and apply

these systems to GRC research rigs/facilities used for combustion and emissions

research related to advanced propulsion systems for the present and future aeronautic

programs. The combustion systems will be hydrocarbon-fueled. The combustion

environments of interest are characterized by high velocity, high pressure and high

temperature. The goals of the systems application efforts are to evolve and evaluate

new techniques and to correct system limitations. The contractor shall also perform the

setup, calibration and validation of three optical diagnostic techniques using lab scale

burners. This will include conducting advanced laser-based, experimental, diagnostics

research for advanced engine research programs in NASA test cells. Contractor

engineers shall also be responsible for coordinating in-house, NASA customer research

efforts.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Perform analytical and experimental research to evolve advanced, low emission gas

turbine combustor concepts for present and future aeronautic programs.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/042.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

The contractor shall develop nonintrusive, laser-based measurement systems and apply

these systems to GRC research rigs/facilities used for combustion and emissions

research related to advanced propulsion systems for the present and future aeronautic

programs. The combustion systems will be hydrocarbon-fueled. The combustion

environments of interest are characterized by high velocity, high pressure and high

temperature. The goals of the systems application efforts are to evolve and evaluate

new techniques and to correct system limitations. The contractor shall also perform the

setup, calibration and validation of three optical diagnostic techniques using lab scale

burners. This will include conducting advanced laser-based, experimental, diagnostics

research for advanced engine research programs in NASA test cells. The contractor

engineers shall be responsible for coordinating in-house, NASA customer research

efforts. 

Specific Work Elements:

1. Due to the severity of the operating conditions, ongoing analysis is required to

provide data fidelity and ensure safety of the research hardware. Determines necessary

design modifications for improving the performance or durability of research hardware.

2. Analyze data, extracts design principles, compares experimental results with

theoretical analysis, develops new theories.

3. Setup, test and calibrate laser and detector system to measure soot in a flame burner

using lasers, PMTs and CCD cameras, configure and install optical train, setup and install

data collection system.

4. Conduct tests for different combustors for advanced engine research programs.

Determine the test matrix for all operating conditions.

5. Analyze the test system to ensure the data fidelity and safety of the research

hardware for each test run, and analyze and process the performance and emission data

of each combustor test.

6. Configure, and install optical train, setup and install data collection system for soot

measurements and demonstrate satisfactory operation for the system.

7. Evaluate, and implement diagnostic methods based on Laser Induced Florescence

(LIF), Raman and/or Rayleigh, and other flow imaging techniques, with emphasis on

planar technology for application to both in-house and customer research rigs and

components. Provide recommendations for measurement system application.

8. Consult with researchers on new diagnostic techniques and systems, which could be

incorporated into a nonintrusive instrumentation system.

9. Evaluate NO measurement calibration method using NO injection system 

10. Write reports and travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical

and/or technology transfer meetings, presentations of research papers, and in acquiring

training or course work useful for enhancing capabilities in performing the task.

Travel as required for training, contacting with engine companies’ engineers and

meeting.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/042.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific

projects.

B. Technical achievements or issues.

2. Computer hardware and software, and miscellaneous equipment and optics as

required for experimental data acquisition and analysis. 

Task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task

performance according to predeter-mined measurables. Revisions, if required, to the

above performance based deliverables will be tracked via monthly reports and

modifications will be jointly agreed upon by the Task Manager and the TR as they relate

to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 5

Schedule 90

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor shall provide the necessary personnel with a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry,

or related fields with a minimum of 15 years experience in experimental combustion

research. 

Knowledge required for the task is as follows:

1. Professional knowledge of gas turbine combustor design principles.

2. A working knowledge of experimental design, data evaluation and processing

procedures.

3. Extensive experience in applying non-intrusive experimental diagnostics to

combustion systems. Familiarity with image processing methods to analyze laser

diagnostic test data from gas turbine flow fields. 

Limited supervisory support is required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/042.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:09 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/043.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Naiman, Cynthia

Task Number: NNC06E043T - 11

Task Title: Computational Technolgy Support for Complex Systems Analysis

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 3/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Full vehicle and engine simulations require a detailed analysis of multi-fidelity and multidiscipline interactions to correctly determine mission performance parameters. The integration

technologies NEW***developed and*** tested in this task will support the development of the

Multidiscipline Design Analysis and Optimization (MDAO) capability being developed under the

Fundamental Aeronautics Program.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The work will NEW***involve developing and testing*** integration techniques to support the

complex analyses of full vehicle and engine systems. The scope includes finite element analysis

(FEA) models, NEW***systems level analysis models, integrating discipline component codes,

and supporting the MDAO framework development.***

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

******* NEW Government's Estimated Period Of Performance October 1, 2009 to March 31,

2011

For a given model effort, NASA will provide the configuration, geometry, fluid type, and model

task objective. The Contractor shall obtain fluid properties as required, generate the model,

perform analysis using the model, and generate a summary report that describes and interprets the

model results.

The modeling effort will evolve comprehensively from simple configurations to more complex

configurations that build upon prior work in the task.

Techniques to integrate variable fidelity and multi-discipline tools shall be developed and tested

by the contractor to support the MDAO capability under development.

SPECIFIC WORK ELEMENTS AND MILESTONES: 

The contractor shall:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/043.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

1. Develop secondary flow system models to integrate with full engine simulations.

2. Support MDAO framework development, testing, and contribute to documentation.

3. Provide a monthly status update summary report.

4. Travel as required.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES:

Provide input to MDAO framework development process. This may require the development of

use cases, requirements development, NEW*** implementing capabilities,*** and testing

procedures. This will also include testing various MDAO capabilities throughout the development

process. (3/31/10)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 10

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Bachelors Degree, Masters Degree, or Ph.D. in Mathemetics, Physics, Mechanical Engineering or

Computer Science with several years experience in design or analysis.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/045.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Crandall, Karen

Task Number: NNC06E045T - 8

Task Title: Project Support to the Research and Technology Directorate

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 119.

The Research & Technology Directorate plans, conducts and directs research, technology and

development (in-house, grant, and contract). The products span fundamental research results to

demonstration of components and systems. This work is conducted in collaboration with multiple

organizations within the Center, other NASA Centers, and other Government and nonGovernment external organizations.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide cost accounting services including the recording, classifying, examining, and analyzing

of data and records of financial transactions for the NASA Glenn Research & Technology

Directorate.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

Provide cost accounting services including the recording, classifying, examining, and analyzing

of data and records of financial transactions. This work is analytical, creative, evaluative, and

advisory. This involves the following eight elements:

1. Review Directorate financial transactions and records for accuracy.

2. As part of the annual fiscal budgeting process, present historical data and trends and suggest

accounting solutions for budget challenges.

3. Apply work breakdown structures to Glenn tasks.

4. Prepare Task Status reports based on budget vs. actual expenditures.

5. Submit draft Operating Account Plan broken down by Division. Correlate plan with actual

commitments and obligations and resolve discrepancies-with RAMO financial representatives.

6. Develop and maintain various reports for tracking and reporting on Directorate transactions. 

8. Provide reports on Division spending, as well as in-house Division Office expenditures.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/045.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables:

1. Status reports on handling of Directorate financial records including 

a) Maintaining record of transactions

b) Reviewing them for accuracy

c) Identifying discrepancies and solutions to budgeting problems

d) Developing funding status reports and plans for Directorate management, including monthly

labor reports showing planned versus actuals. 

List of reports that the contractor shall develop: budget, budget vs. actuals, and projections for

commitments, obligations, costs, and ad hoc (quarterly).

2. Contractor shall submit monthly Technical Progress and Resource Management Report

(monthly)

Progress reviews will be conducted periodically with the NASA TR. 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, contractor shall include any open risks

associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 15

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior Project Control Analyst with >15 years experience in providing budget, funding, and

resource analysis services to NASA Glenn.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/046.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Colantonio, Renato

Task Number: NNC06E046T - 26

Task Title: Aircraft Icing Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/12/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 122.

BACKGROUND: 

The accumulation of ice on aircraft/rotorcraft lift surfaces and engine inlets poses a serious hazard

to flight safety. Flight testing, wind tunnel experiments, and computational analyses all have vital

roles in understanding the icing phenomena, and the Icing Branch at NASA Glenn is heavily

involved in all three areas. Flight tests with specially modified aircraft provide icing data under

actual icing conditions, but are costly. Wind tunnel tests provide data under more carefully

controlled conditions at less cost. Analytical tools (such as NASA Glenn's LEWICE program) aid

in understanding the underlying physics.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION:

The contractor shall provide the necessary technical expertise to support the development of

experimental methods related to icing research as defined below.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work:

Conduct and support experimental research for: 1) validation of icing computational tools, 2)

development of new test methods for icing research, and 3) improvements in the knowledge of

icing physics/ice shape growth and the associated aerodynamic changes. Support the development

of training materials and information management.

Note work under this task relating to the use of Ka band radar for icing sensing is undergoing

programmatic changes and the start date shall be delayed to March, 2010.

Travel as required.

***Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2011***
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/046.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Iced Aerodynamics: support the aerodynamic simulation wind tunnel tests (icing and dry) for

the Aero Simulation project. Investigate the performance degradation on an airfoil as a function

of duration of an icing encounter.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 20

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILES: 

Ph.D. in Aeronautical/Astronautical Engineering with knowledge of icing, heat transfer, flight

dynamics, and applied aerodynamics in experimental testing required.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/047.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Burke, Kenneth

Task Number: NNC06E047T - 18

Task Title: Regenerative Gas Dryer Set-Up

Task Details

Period of Performance

3/3/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by DR received on 12/28/2006, ljm

No-Bid by DE received on 12/20/2006, ljm

No-Bid by R received on 12/13/2006, ldk

Entered as WISE Task 20061208 on 12/11/2006, ljm

This Task was formerly GESS Task 123.

Thermal components are being developed to passively control the temperature of

unitized regenerative fuel cell systems. These thermal components include advanced

heat fins and advanced planar heat pipes. The current research involves testing of

candidate heat fins and heat pipes from outside sources and testing these under

expected fuel cell conditions. The research also involves fabrication of advanced heat

fins and planar heat pipes based on a NASA GRC designs.

This task will also provide for the research and development of Balance of Plant (BOP)

hardware for up to a 3kW fuel cell system. The BOP should include the reactant

handling, cooling, water storage, and purge functionality.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to assist with research of advanced

heat fins and planar heat pipes using the NASA GRC designs.

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to operate the test rig(s) necessary

for the testing of advanced heat fins and planar heat pipes. The test rig(s) will be used

to test both advanced heat fins and heat pipes that are either procured from an outside

source or developed at NASA GRC.

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to support the initial checkout and

performance testing of the advanced heat fins and planar heat pipes.

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to assist with research of the

passive fuel cell system heat exchanger. 

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to support the initial checkout and

performance testing of the advanced heat fins and planar heat pipes integrated with the

fuel cell system heat exchanger.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/047.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to assist with research of the BOP

for a 3kW fuel cell system. 

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to bench test the BOP .

The contractor shall provide the personnel necessary to support integrated testing with

the fuel cell stacks received from non-flow thru stack vendors.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** *Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011***

1.0 Assist with the research of advanced heat fins and planar heat pipes using the NASA

GRC designs.

2.0 Support the testing of the advanced heat fins and planar heat pipes.

3.0 Assist with the research of the passive fuel cell system heat exchanger.

4.0 Operate the test rig(s) necessary for the testing of the advanced heat fins and

planar heat pipes integrated with the passive fuel cell system heat exchanger.

5.0 Assist with the research of the BOP for the fuel cell system and for the BOP for a 3

kW fuel cell system. 

6.0 Support the testing of the BOP prior to integration with the fuel cell stacks from the

non-flow thru fuel cell stack vendors.

7.0 Integrate with BOP with the non-flow-thru fuel cell stacks.

8.0 Support integrated testing of the BOP with the non-flow-thru fuel cell stacks.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones for this period shall include the following:

1. Provide monthly task reports describing the prior month’s activities.

2. Provide monthly burn rate reports describing the expenditure of task funds for the

prior month’s activities.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 65

Schedule 30
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/047.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

All material procurements are to be directed through the task technical representative.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/048.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Johnson, Sandra

Task Number: NNC06E048T - 12

Task Title: Integrated Communictions Technology Work Area Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Not Applicable

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: The contractor shall provide qualified personnel for facility

development and operations of state-of-the-art phased array antenna development

testing and the development of an open architecture for software defined radios for

space.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

1. Provide support as required for a Test and Validation Laboratory configuration,

installation, and test for reconfigurable transceiver.

2. Install and operate Architecture Compliance tools and programs.

3. Update and/or create relevant databases containing information of current and

potential technologies for SDR, including RF front end technologies that could be

considered in the future.

4. Initiate and maintain an STRS web site for both internal and external connection.

Provide the ability, through the web site, to receive comments from the outside

community.

5. Document and run available waveform models.

6. Initiate and maintain a “STRS Waveform Library” 

7. Participate in the development of the STRS Change Board Procedure, support the

STRS Change Board process, and update STRS documentation as determined by the

STRS Change Board.

8. Support specification/acquisition of Operating Environment components for STRS

Reference Implementation.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/048.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

9. Develop and/or evaluate software, interfaces, APIs necessary to implement STRS

architecture.

10. Install a version of the STRS infrastructure on at least one vendor provided space

platform.

11. Assist the reference implementation team on the development of the specifications

for the reference implementation.

12. Assist in the development of the reference implementation.

13. Provide support as required for SDR Technology Lab computers residing on the

internal standalone network.

14. Maintain expertise on the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Software

Communications Architecture (SCA). 

15. Support modeling programs required for estimating the resources required for

implementation of SDRs and open architectures. 

16. Provide a representative to the OMG on behalf of NASA to track and convey

interests of SDR for space.

17. Monitor JTRS JPO SCA Change Board pending proposals and share information with

NASA.

18. Provide support to the NASA liaison to JPL for the Electra installation and operation.

19. Recommend upgrades to the TVL including the addition of an RF channel simulator

and test equipment control.

20. Support the integration, operation, and STRS assessment of the CONNECT software

defined radio breadboards and engineering models.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Note: All CONNECT related milestones will be dependent on the availability of the

CONNECT vendor hardware and software.

• November 2009 : Update the database of the current licensed software being used in

the TVL and software purchased with STRS and CONNECT WBS 8.0 funds installed

outside of the TVL including owners, expiration date, and other pertinent details.

• December 2009 (or within one month of receipt of software and hardware appropriate

for testing) - Complete compliance testing of the JPL breadboard system and provide

results report.

• December 2009 - Provide an updated STRD for the CONNECT CDR.

• December 2009 - Report detailing the status and available results of the verification of

the GRC/GSFC waveform against requirements, focusing on the control and telemetry

interface to the GPP.

• January 2010 - Report detailing the EDS assembly status and remaining issues.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/048.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

• January 2010 - Complete compliance testing of the CONNECT GD breadboard system

and provide results report.

• January 2010 - Witness acceptance test of RT Logic TSIM and write a summary report.

• March 2010 - Complete compliance testing of the CONNECT JPL Engineering Model

system and provide results report.

• March 2010 - Report describing results of the CONNECT JPL flight unit pre-ship review.

2 weeks after attendance at all conferences and training - Provide a trip report detailing

the information obtained to the NASA GRC STRS team.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 35

Cost 15

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Communications Engineering support, RF Technician support, Task Manager

Government Furnished Property

Unique software applications required to perform the work on this task will be identified

by the contractor, as required, and will be provided by the customer to meet the

deliverables of the task.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/051.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Dunlap, Patrick

Task Number: NNC06E051T - 13

Task Title: Seal Development Technical Services

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

BACKGROUND: 

The Seal Team at the NASA Glenn Research Center is currently involved in aggressive projects

to develop and demonstrate seal technologies for the CEV Low Impact Docking System (LIDS)

and for a single-use high-speed vehicle application for the U.S. Army. These projects require the

design, fabrication, and installation of test fixture hardware in preparation for experimental testing

of candidate seal designs. Due to the number of experimental programs that the Seal Team is

involved in, there is a need for technical services to support these programs in addition to

engineering and fabrication services. The contractor has the requisite capability and manpower to

provide these services for NASA GRC. Contractor engineering technician support shall conduct

performance-based tasks in the seal test facilities in the Tribology and Mechanical Components

Branch of the Structures and Materials Division at NASA GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

The contractor shall perform technical, engineering, and fabrication tasks to conduct performance

based activities according to the predetermined milestones as they relate to required seal

development research.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The personnel assigned to this task shall complete the following activities autonomously or

cooperatively with government personnel to meet the desired milestones:

1. Provide support in conducting seal leakage, permeability, compression, adhesion, and scrub

tests.

2. Provide support in the fabrication of prototype seal designs.

3. Assist in design of new test rigs and test rig components.

4. Review design of test fixtures for manufacturability, functionality, and serviceability.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/051.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

5. Install seal test rigs, fixtures, and support hardware.

6. Assist in checkout of new test rigs and fixtures.

7. Provide support in fabrication of necessary brackets and small fixtures.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

  New as of 8/19/09 ** **

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

1. Complete installation and setup of test fixtures for sub-scale LIDS seal testing, 11/30/09

2. Complete modifications and installation of test fixtures for Army seal testing, 3/30/10

3. Provide monthly financial and task summary.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 20

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior level engineering assistant/technician support with experience in test hardware design and

fabrication as well as test facility set-up, modification and operation shall be assigned to this task.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/053.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Lewandowski, Beth

Task Number: NNC06E053T - 12

Task Title: Experimental Research/Technical Support for Biomedical Projects in the

Bioscience & Technology Branch

Task Details

Period of Performance

7/27/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 146.

BACKGROUND: 

The optical diagnosis project at NASA JSC/GRC conducts a variety of research related to

non-invasive measurement of physiological markers of interest in space physiology

studies.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Conduct design and modifications of the NASA Eye and finger Probes to meet the needs

of NASA JSC/GRC researchers as determined by the PI (Dr. Ansari). Conduct

experiments and collect data using the eye probe, the finger probe, and other optical

devices (Raman) according to the test protocols developed by the NASA PI’s.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

***Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011***

Broad Scope of Work:

The object of this task is to provide technical services to the Human Research project,

within the Bio-Science and Technology Branch (REB) and the Human Research Program

at GRC.

The object of this task is to provide technical services to the research programs in GRC’s

Bio-Science and Bio-Engineering Technology Branch REB for the project in oxidative

stress studies in astronauts and divers and blood perfusion studies in fingertips.

Specific Work Elements: 10/01/09 - 09/30/10

Design modifications to the existing optical diagnostic equipment, located at GRC. The

modifications will allow the use of these probes (DLS, Raman, and LDF) to study

oxidative stress in the eye and blood flow in fingertips. This will require performing

experimentation, analyzing and publishing results. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/053.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities. 

The task/time is divided as follows:

NBL Diver Study (SOMD) – 35% (WBS #: 599 891.01.03.01)

Astronaut Fingertip Study (HRP-EPSP) -15% (WBS # 516 724.02.02.06.03)

Biofuel Fiberoptic-turbidity Sensor -15% (WBS #: 561581.02.08.03.16.02)

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

A summary of the identified milestones and deliverables to NASA is defined as follows:

Deliverables:

Provide monthly reports to include a status of activities and financial information

including hours spent on the task during the month.

This task does not require any OSAT plans.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Personnel shall be assigned to this task that have the necessary skills and training for

the successful performance of this task. Continued availability of personnel with

necessary skills to support this task is crucial for success of these efforts. 

Personnel with appropriate background in optics, optical devices, specialized research

hardware design, fabrication and testing shall be assigned to this task.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/055.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

Technical Representative: Sil, Ajit

Task Number: NNC06E055T - 12

Task Title: Engineering & Computer Development for RTM

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/23/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

This Task was formerly GESS Task 153.

BACKGROUND: 

The Multidisciplinary Design, Analysis, and Optimization (MDAO) branch of the NASA Glenn

Research Center has played an integral role in defining advanced technology options and pay-off

areas of research for many of the critical technology programs in the Aeronautics Research

Mission Directorate. Current efforts within the branch support projects within the Fundamental

Aeronautics Program, the Aviation Safety Program and, beginning in FY10, the Integrated

Systems Research Program. This work encompasses propulsion/aircraft R&T across all flight

regimes, environmental impact and energy R&T, system safety and capacity analyses and related

methods development. This task supplies access to specialized talents and resources to help

MDAO accomplish its mission.

*******************************************************

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Provide analysis/tool development and support to the Multidisciplinary Design, Analysis, and

Optimization branch, Code RTM.

*******************************************************

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

***Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011*****

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

Specific Work Elements:

Subtask 1 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/055.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

a) Provide information research, data mining and regression analyses in support of MDAO

engineering activities. Perform reduction/redaction of data and document archival information in

support of relevant branch mission objectives & project milestones. 

b) Provide engineering methods development support using basic programming skills within the

standard desktop environment. Assure programming portability through installation and testing on

relevant MDAO computing platforms. Programming skills include applications using Visual

Basic for MS-Excel, MS-Access, XML, etc, as well as interfacing new methods with existing

applications in FORTRAN, C++, Python, etc.

*******************************************************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

Subtask 1

a) Deliver monthly coordination memos summarizing information gathered and sources

referenced. Deliver annual report documenting data reductions and archive contributions. 

b) Deliver programming/application source code, user documentation, and engineering support

summaries for methods development activities.

*******************************************************

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 10

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 21, 2009 *******

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

Analysis Assistant - Associate of Business (or equivalent/higher degree) and experience in office

automation, microcomputer graphics, desktop programming, spread sheet and data base use.

Limited administrative support may also be needed.

*******************************************************

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY: 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/055.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:10 AM]

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Polansky, Beth

Task Number: NNC06E056T - 13

Task Title: Glenn Office of the CFO

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/19/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Due to CFO Reorganization, this Task has been combined with formerly Tasks 72.

Background:

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

The Glenn Office of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) is responsible for management or

oversight of a number of Information Technology (IT) projects related to finance and

budgeting activities. These include the Coordination of the Planning, Programming,

Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) activities and other business functions. The CFO also

performs a broad range of computerized tasks ranging from manipulation of mainframe

and client server financial budgeting systems, to all facets of using a personal computer.

In order to make most efficient use of their resources and maintain its reliability the

Directorate requires support in the planning and maintenance of their IT infrastructure.

Task Order Description:

Description of Services to be procured

Support Project management activities, computer systems analysis, microcomputer

functions, networking and related administration, integrating all hardware and software

requirements for all CFO organizations.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Support Project management activities, computer systems analysis, microcomputer

functions, networking and related administration, integrating all hardware and software

requirements for all CFO organizations.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Scope of Work

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Hardware, software, and necessary tools may be procured via NASA channels at the

GESS Task Representatives discretion pending the need and/or requirements to meet
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

NASA driven initiatives or directives relating to IT compliance or organizations specific

requirements

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

***Governments estimate period of performance extends from April 1, 2009 to August

31, 2011.***

Subtask 01

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Modified to support entire CFO organization and CFO projects (instead of IEM Projects)

Information Technology (IT) activities:

1. CFO Office Systems. The contractor shall perform administrative functions on the CFO

server system, including systems and application software installation and configuration

and maintenance of Internet and local network connectivity in support of the CFO

Organization and related World Wide Web sites. 

2. The contractor shall also support the acquisition of equipment and services in support

of the CFO organization, including development of specifications and facilitation of the

procurement process.

3. CFO Application Software and Data. The contractor shall develop and maintain

computer applications in support of CFO activities, and where appropriate, shall support

Civil Servants and other contractors in the development of related systems. Support may

range from direct participation to expert consultation on Internet, database, and other

development. Applications will include: 

• Programs and databases for program management 

• Program Web Site

• Program/project activity planning and monitoring

• action item tracking, 

• team and mailing list maintenance

• equipment inventory

• document library

• calendar

• risk management

• budget integration and financial reporting

• Support PPBE integration activities

• Maintain budget trace sheets

**********************************************************************

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Modified to support entire CFO organization and CFO projects (instead of IEM Projects)

Project Management Activities:

4. As requested by the customer, develop programs and databases to support

component or related projects.

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

5. Project management, business analysis and Systems Analysis.

• Project and Change Management Support. The contractor shall support the

implementation of CFO projects through analysis of Glenn business systems,

development of documentation, prototype development, meeting facilitation, and

participation in training and testing, working closely with civil servants and contractors in

related tasks.

• Data Management. The contractor shall support the implementation of CFO projects

through application data modeling, data system documentation (data flows, entityrelationship diagrams, process flows) and support of the Agency-level data management

process.

• Configuration Management. The contractor shall perform configuration management

(CM) on software and documentation developed locally and coordinate with CM activities

elsewhere in the project.

• Project Support. The contractor shall support other project activities (e.g., meeting

minutes, meeting coordination and facilitation, budget, schedule and risk integration) as

requested.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

6. Support of Component Projects. Contractor shall monitor the Glenn activities of the

projects but which is not the direct responsibility of the CFO, in order to assist in

coordination of activities.

***********************************************************************

7.. Development and Maintenance of CFO-related Web Sites. The contractor will develop

and maintain Web sites for the CFO Office and for designated offices of the CFO such as

the Glenn Exchange. Additionally, the contractor will act as a technical focal point to

coordinate all other Web sites falling within the CFO Directorate.

9. Provide miscellaneous IT support (problem identification/resolution, laptops, printers,

palms, s/w). Provided user account management (central directory, distribution lists,

systems administration), and equipment management (ODIN seats & service levels,

NASA equipment, and IEM training facility).

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

Subtask 02 is working being cosolidated from task 72

Subtask 02

The Contractor SHALL Analyze and RESPOND TO SYSTEM FAILURES, MAKE AN INITIAL

PROBLEM ASSESSMENT TO DETERMINE CAUSE OF FAILURE AND DEVELOP COURSE OF

ACTION TO RESTORE FUNCTION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE."

Perform computer systems analysis and technical services, integrating CFO specific

software and hardware requirements and NASA initiatives such as ODIN, security, and

ISO 9001. Includes all areas of information systems support, development, maintenance,

enhancements, and interconnectivity with internal and external computer systems and

servers. Provide coordination and facilitation within the entire CFO organization and GRC

as required..

Specific Work Elements

1.0 Task Communications

1.0 Project Status

The contractor shall meet with the customer monthly, or when deemed necessary by the

customer to review status on tasks and/or projects, and discuss task requirements.

1.2 Contractor Reporting

The contractor shall provide a written report once a month describing work

accomplished, for whom the work was accomplished, and the time required to complete

the work; problems identified and resolved, and work to be accomplished in the next

reporting period and the schedule to be maintained. Provide status on projects and

computer related changes. Produce computer budget status report when requested.

1.3 Technical Representative

Act as Code B point of contact for the Outsourcing Desktop Initiative for NASA (ODIN),

Glenn ODIN Project Office. Support the Organization Computer Security Representative

(OCSR). Serve as primary Code B computer administrator.

Represent the division in all other computer-related areas, providing IT related plans and

recommendations, as requested by CFO management.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

2.0 Technical Services and Support 

2.1 Support CFO and agency developed Applications

Provide custom application integration of internal and external systems, and

development of client and server solutions including the following:

• N2

• Other GRC and NASA system integration: CORE module 

within SAP,Outlook,etc.

2.2 Client Computer Systems

Integrate, maintain, and enhance functionality of CFO client computers in accordance

with GRC’s ODIN environment, and other GRC and NASA initiatives, policies, directives,

and standards as required or requested. Includes identification, testing, migration,

phase-out/excess, upgrade/conversion of CFO hardware/software applications and data,

integration with requirements, and development of cost-effective solutions and/or

automated techniques. Comply with all Security rules and regulations.

2.3 Server Computer Systems

Integrate, develop, maintain, and enhance functionality of CFO resource servers in

accordance with GRC and NASA initiatives, policies, and standards and Security rules

and regulations.

Develop and integrate server components including web, database, application, print,

and files services for CFO specific requirements. Provide maintenance on server logs and

auditing, reporting pertinent findings to GRC security in accordance with incident

reporting policy.

Develop and perform resource domain server administrator functions including weekly

backup, virus scanning/updates, defragmentation, GRC and local account/group access

security, documentation, and maintenance. Install, configure and automate server

system applications, utilities, updates and patches.

2.4 Web Development/Support

Develop, maintain, and enhance website (Intranet) in conjunction with the WEB teams

for the CFO directorate, conforming to GRC/Security Web policies. Develop organizationspecific Intranet solutions per request, including database integration, scripting,

graphics, and security to provide creative and innovative suggested uses to support CFO

business functions.

Provide web page integration and development including PPBE, Phasing Plans, Workforce

planning, ISO 9001, financial cost estimating, reimbursable management, Web feedback

mechanism, organizational structure, and other requested or recommended business

functions.

2.5 General Support

Troubleshoot and resolve all computer related technical issues that impact work

schedules and job performance for the entire CFO Organization with near immediate

response time, acting as a liaison to other GRC resources. Provide consultation and staff

training as directed.

Perform maintenance on computers such as file management, configuration/compatibility

issues with GRC IT directives, training computer users on software, processes, including
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

recently implemented computer developments.

Develop software solutions and automated techniques using office automation

tools,(e.g., spreadsheet, database, desktop publishing, presentation graphics, and word

processing) or through use of Intranet, server, or other effective means.

Maintain the remote communications links for CFO users. Support maintaining peripheral

including PDA’s, scanners, notebooks, projectors, and all printing requirements, acting as

liaison to ODIN or other GRC resources as deemed necessary.

2.6 Planning

Provide recommendations and solutions including future upgrades and enhancements on

as-needed basis to ensure continued productivity improvements. Evaluate impacts of

industry and ODIN implemented IT initiatives.

Facilitate and work with developers, program analysts, contractors, and others as

needed, providing training on processes, procedures, and developed solutions, to meet

customer deadlines, and improve efficiency of business operation. Coordinate with

support staff as deemed necessary.

Includes Windows XP, security, web and network integration, and server

automation/maintenance.

ISO 9001: Support includes files retention, archive, livelink integration, creation of PDF

files, audit compliance to ensure commitment to continuous improvement and innovation

ensures quality products, timely services and satisfied customers.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Review and update as needed the CFO Security Plan and make necessary changes in

consultation with CFO management, as required by agency/center policy and

procedures. Submit by required date. Will be part of quality of performance metric. 

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

********NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009***********

The contractor shall provide personnel who have the skill and knowledge base to

support the requirements as a team and provide back-up or additional support within
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/056.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

this task. (Computer and Project Management)

**********************************************************************

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

None, but the following government installation accountable may be utilized:

Hardware, software, and necessary tools may be procured via NASA channels at the

GESS Task Representatives discretion pending the need and/or requirements to meet

NASA driven initiatives or directives relating to IT compliance or organizations specific

requirements.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/058.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Heidmann, James

Task Number: NNC06E058T - 10

Task Title: 3-D Turbomachinery Heat Transfer

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/12/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 162.

BACKGROUND: 

Conjugate heat transfer capabilities would allow improved CFD predictions of flows in

such diverse areas as cooled turbines and impingement-heated anti-icing aircraft wing

geometries. Also, improvements are required in grid generation procedures and interface

boundary conditions to enable these improved predictive capabilities.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Investigate available computational fluid dynamic methodologies for improving

convective heat transfer prediction accuracy and speed, especially in internal and

impingement flows. Enable conjugate heat transfer capability in Glenn-HT code. Study

automatic topology generation schemes.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

***Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to 8/31/2011***

Broad Scope of Work:

Contractor shall investigate potential conjugate heat transfer implementation strategies

in the Glenn-HT code, implement the desired method, and ensure that the solver is able

to model a realistic cooled turbine geometry. Contractor shall also enable multiple blade

row unsteady calculations through incorporation of an interpolation scheme for two

adjacent grids having relative motion.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

Apply and evaluate general interface capability (GIF) of Glenn-HT code for unsteady
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/058.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

turbine stage having relative motion between blade rows. Incorporate and perform initial

testing of multiple blade row interpolation scheme.

Work with development of 3D medial axis surface for potential use in automatic topology

generation for turbomachinery.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

Ph.D. in Aerospace or Mechanical engineering, experience in numerical analysis of heat

transfer and unsteady flows.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/061.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Bilardo, Vincent

Task Number: NNC06E061T - 11

Task Title: Project Control Support for Exploration Systems

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 171.

BACKGROUND: The Advanced Capabilities Project Office (ACPO) is responsible for

providing deliverables for a multitude of Technical Projects under Exploration Technology

Development Program, ETDP. The ETDP Program (GRC is the responsible NASA Center

for the various ETDP Projects) supports the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: Support for project level scheduling that includes roll-up of

schedules from the Advanced Capabilities Projects. The task involves top level schedule

and resource loaded planning and development which coordinates milestones and

objectives through communication and interaction with Project Management and

technical leads. The task will involve deriving on overall scheduling plan, regular

communication and technical interchanges with Project managers, technical leads, and

development/maintenance of schedules within this system to accurately track project

progress.

Support for Advanced Capabilities Projects also includes budget resources planning and

tracking, including Purchase Request generating and tracking, labor reports and

tracking, and full cost analysis and tracking.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** *Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011***

The ACPO requires the support of experienced schedulers and budget analyst(s) with the

ability to develop and organize activity based (WBS product oriented) on the ACPO

technical tasks GRC maintains. Expert proficiency in the following software applications is

required: Power Point, Excel, Microsoft Project, Fast Track, Access, and Word. 

The task will require an integrated project schedule to track major activities, milestones,

and resources for ACPO management. The work will require the development of all

project schedules and the tracking and identification of scheduling issues that cross

project boundaries and will require reporting of feedback on individual critical path
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/061.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

scheduling items. For this task, all schedule inputs and changes, provided by Project

technical task managers, are to be reviewed by the analyst for consistency and viability

and reported on to ACPO management.

Task requires proficient schedule analyst capabilities at a high level. This requirement

should involve personnel with proficient oral and written communication skills for project

activity coordination.

The ACPO requires support for budget planning and resource tracking analysis.

Proficiency and knowledge of the NASA IEMP system is required, along with knowledge

and efficiency in Microsoft PowerPoint, Word & Excel. 

The work will require assisting the project manager with the development of the annual

budget and the 12 month project planning. The work requires the tracking of

commitments, obligations, cost, and workforce associated with the projects. Monitor and

evaluate cost changes that varies from plan and report explanation of change to project

manager. Develop end-of-year estimates of project costs. Preparation of financial charts

reporting of full cost required monthly and periodic update as applicable. 

The task will require project budget realignments to be requested through the Civil

Servant Analyst as required.

This task will require that project budgets will be analyzed and the results communicated

to the project manager at least on a monthly basis. Preparation and approval of

purchase requisitions for the projects is also included.

This task requires on a monthly basis, verification of accuracy of the plans (as

maintained in the E-room) and financial data (that is down-loaded from the government

financial system).

If travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted

into the accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional

task requirements.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Prove Lead Analyst support in all areas of Code MA in financial and workforce tracking

and analysis.

2. Monthly Financial detail report due the 3rd working day of the month.

3. Phasing Plan due to the Lead Analyst on the date indicated in the Call letter. All

actions should be completed timely as indicated on E-Mail correspondence.

4. Financial Summary chart due the 4th working day of the month.

5. Obligations and Cost due by the 5th/6th working day of the month.

6. Provide monthly financial analysis.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/061.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Database/Budget Analyst/Scheduler

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/065.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Geng, Steven

Task Number: NNC06E065T - 11

Task Title: Aging and Static Characterization of Rare Earth Permanent Magnets for

Stirling Engine Linear Alternator

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 181.

Linear alternators, coupled to free piston engines and excited by rare earth permanent

magnets, have shown in recent tests to be promising candidates for reliable and efficient

sources of electrical power for future planetary spacecraft. To achieve a high power

density linear alternator requires the use of high flux density rare earth permanent

magnets (REPM) of the Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) type and the higher

temperature REPMs of the Samarium-Cobalt (SmCo) type. Effective utilization of REPMs

requires that the magnets must be able to withstand severe demagnetizing fields at

elevated temperatures for long times of perhaps decades without any significant loss in

either flux density or intrinsic coercivity. Data indicating long-term magnet aging

properties of NdFeB and SmCo magnets under the combined stresses of temperature

and applied demagnetizing field is not available from either the magnet’s manufacturer

or from the literature.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Develop an experimental data base and theoretical guidelines that characterize the short

and long term stability of the magnetization properties of rare earth permanent magnets

under the combined stresses of temperature and demagnetizing fields expected in linear

alternators designed for space applications. Develop an experimental data base and

theoretical guidelines that characterize Stirling linear alternator performance.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall develop an experimental data base and theoretical guidelines that

characterize the short and long term stability of the magnetization properties of rare

earth permanent magnets under the combined stresses of temperature and

demagnetizing fields expected in linear alternators designed for space applications. The

contractor shall develop an experimental data base and theoretical guidelines that

characterize Stirling linear alternator performance.

The contractor shall assist the Government in theoretical and experimental evaluations of

recent advances in Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs), in particular participating in

the inter-Center collaboration with Langley Research Center to devise evaluation tests
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/065.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

on the Widom-Larsen theories.

Specific Work Elements

1. The contractor shall design, develop, upgrade, calibrate and implement test fixtures,

test equipment and instrumentation to conduct static magnetization characteristic tests

of rare earth permanent magnets (REPMs) under the combined conditions of

temperature and demagnetizing field.

2. The contractor shall design, develop, upgrade, calibrate, and implement data

acquisition systems for M-H characterization of REPMs.

3. The contractor shall design, develop, upgrade, calibrate, and implement data

acquisition and control systems for static magnetization characterization of REPMs for

short and long-term aging tests under the combined conditions of temperature and

demagnetizing field.

4. The contractor shall design, develop, upgrade, calibrate, and implement data analysis

computer programs for analyzing, plotting and cross-plotting M-H characterization test

data.

5. The contractor shall develop on a continuous basis a database of static M-H

characterization curves for selected candidate REPMs at selected temperatures.

6. The contractor shall conduct NdFeB and SmCo type magnet aging characterization

tests under the combined stresses of temperature and applied demagnetizing field.

7. The contractor shall select promising candidate magnet materials for long duration

space power linear alternator applications based on experimental data obtained in items

5 and 6 above.

8. The contractor shall consult on in-house linear alternator designs and multi-converter

control schemes as they impact magnet performance and reliability.

9. The contractor shall document test procedures and establish data logs for the aging

tests.

10. The contractor shall design, develop, upgrade, calibrate, and implement data

analysis computer programs and instrumentation for analyzing, plotting and crossplotting linear alternator test data.

11. The contractor shall conceive/identify/plan research and testing of linear alternators

using GRC's Alternator Test Rig (ATR).

12. The contractor shall write reports and papers on results obtained in items 1 through

11 above.

13. The contractor shall evaluate proposals such as NASA’s Small Business Innovative

Research (SBIR) proposals and NASA’s Research Announcements (NRA’s) in the

applicable areas of research described above.

14. The contractor shall review technical papers and reports in the applicable areas of

research described above.

15. The contractor shall consult on in-house linear alternator magneto-static modeling.

16. The contractor shall consult on DOE laboratory radiation testing of REPMs.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/065.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

1. Provide Training for the operation of all magnet aging & characterization equipment,

the Helmholtz Coils, and the magnetization equipment. (3/31/10)

2. Acquire 18,000-hour aging data for Sm-Co magnets (5/31/10)

3. Perform general comparison between five linear alternator types: 

a) STC/Infinia (Nasar)

b) Vulcan (Holliday)

c) Sunpower (Redlich)

d) MTI (Mechanical Technology Inc.)

e) STAR (Clever Fellows Innovation Consortium) (7/31/10)

Note milestones (2 and 3) are not due this Award Fee Period and are included for

information only.

Deliverables:

1. Document detailing the operation of the Magnet Aging Apparatus (10/15/09)

2. Document detailing the operation of the Magnet Characterization Apparatus

(10/31/09)

3. Document detailing the operation of the Magnet Pulse Magnetizer (11/30/09)

4. Document detailing the operation of the Helmholtz Coils (12/31/09)

5. Report of 18,000 hour Sm-Co magnet aging test results (7/31/10)

Note deliverable 5 is not due this Award Fee Period and is included for information only.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 65

Schedule 25

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Physicist support with experience in permanent magnet technology, materials and

measurements, magnet test equipment and instrumentation, data acquisition systems,

and vacuum systems shall be assigned to this task.

Government Furnished Property

A laboratory equipped with appropriate test equipment and instruments for the

characterization and evaluation of rare earth permanent magnets shall also be provided

for this task. A magnet charger capable of pulse magnetizing rare earth magnet samples

shall also be provided.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/065.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/066.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Dever, Timothy

Task Number: NNC06E066T - 16

Task Title: Advanced Aerospace Power System Test Bed Program

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 184.

BACKGROUND: 

NASA Glenn Research Center is the center of excellence for Aerospace Electrical Power

System. The Electrical Systems Development Branch leads NASA's effort to advance

enabling technologies leading to the next generation of Aerospace Electrical Power

Management and Distribution Systems. NASA’s Vision for Space Exploration to extend

human presence across the solar system and beyond includes the completion of the

International Space Station, to safely fly the Space Shuttle until 2010, to develop and fly

the Crew Exploration Vehicle no later than 2014 , and to return to the Moon no later

than 2020. To accomplish this vision, NASA needs to develop supporting innovative

technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures and promote international and commercial

participation in exploration.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

Provide engineering labor, management, material tools, and related expertise necessary

to develop advanced technologies for Aerospace Electrical Power Systems.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The Contractor shall provide design, construction, and evaluation of power system

elements for aerospace applications. Investigate and experimentally verify the benefits of

innovative power system components in a systems context. Provide integration of any

combination of these components into system-level demonstrations.

An electrical system testbed for Ares I Upper Stage EPS was approved to support the

Ares I program at GRC. Three EPS elements need to be designed, fabricated and tested.

They are the Power Distribution and Control Unit, the Battery Unit, and the Pump Motor

Inverter Unit. Each of these elements will involve electrical and mechanical design work.

Upon completion of the design, these elements will need to be fabricated and integrated

together into a test platform which is representative of the Ares I EPS. In addition,

supporting elements like a flight computer simulator, a battery charger, and a set of

loads will need to be made to complete test bed.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/066.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Specific Work Elements;

• Provide design, fabrication, installation and checkout for electric power components

and systems

• Develop test plans and procedures

• Design test-beds

Contractor shall allocate training and travel as associated with this task during this

period of performance.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

All deliverables and milestones will be evaluated on the timeliness of the deliverable, the

amount of relevant data, the accuracy of the data, technical contents, and analyses.

Milestones and Deliverables

1) Ares I Upper Stage Electrical Power System (EPS) prototype Power Distribution and

Control Unit (PDCU).

2) Labview software to operate Ares I Upper Stage Electrical Power System prototype

PDCU.

3) Report describing the difference between the prototype PDCU and the flight PDCU,

how to operate the prototype PDCU, with appendix including: mechanical and electrical

drawings used to build the box and circuits, a parts list, and a software items list.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Electrical, electronic, Labview software, other software, mechanical design and

fabrication skills are required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/067.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Shook, Tony

Task Number: NNC06E067T - 21

Task Title: Subsonic Fixed Wing Aeronautics Research Program Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

These design efforts will provide the necessary support to fabricate and install hardware

that will provide "state-of-the-art" acoustic research in the area of fan/stator noise.

These efforts will support the Subsonic Fixed Wing Aeronautics research programs at

GRC including the UHB Cycle Noise Reduction Technology Maturation Testing and the

Open Rotor Propeller Rig testing planned in April 2009.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION:

Provide design/drafting services including 3D solid modeling using Pro-E to support a

variety of hardware development activities required to support testing in the 9x15 and

the AAPL

1) Support follow-on hardware requirements for the AAPL if required.

2) Provide design and manufacturing services to support UHB Cycle Noise Reduction

Technology Maturation Test. 

3) Provide design and manufacturing services to support new bearing seal test rig

hardware.

4) Provide engineering, design, and fabrication services to support Counter Rotation Rig

refurbishment and upgrade activities including a new Telemetry System.

********** Added 8/26/09 ****************

5) Provide design engineering and fabrication to develop hardware in support of the

9x15 acoustic testing required in support of the ORPR program.

6) Transfer all Linear Microphone development activities from this task to a new GESS-2

task to allow separate accounting of allocated funding

7) Revise work elements within sub-task 3; SE-18 Finger Seal Test Rig to including

infrared temperature measurement capabilities in order to make accurate temperature

measurements on the seal near the seal / rotor interface. Additionally procure some

measurement services and also fabrication and alterations of parts for the existing rig.

********************************************

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/067.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

** *Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011*** 

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

The current activities are planned to focus on the completion of engineering and design

support activities for the Open Rotor Propeller Rig (ORPR) refurbishment and telemetry

system. In addition, on-going support may be required for planning of new phases of

test hardware associated with the previous completion of the UHB Cycle Noise Reduction

Technology Maturation Testing. It is also expected that engineering and related

procurement services for the SE-18 Non-contacting Finger Seal Design activities may be

required.

Specific Work Elements: 

1) Task Management 

a) Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task; resolve problems and

keep the technical representative informed of all issues. The contractor shall prepare and

forward to the technical representative a monthly progress report defining the month’s

technical progress and the future month’s planned activities.

2) ANCF Layout/Design & Fabrication Support (Sub-task S1)

a) All current design support activity had been completed in previous periods, sub-task

to remain active for future support if needed. An amendment may be required to adjust

cost plan if required.

3) Acoustic Test Hardware Development (Sub-task S2)

a) Provide mechanical engineering, design and procurement services to support UHB

Cycle Noise Reduction Technology Maturation Testing as needed.

b) Complete hardware procurements and drawing documentation for the hardware

developed in the previous periods. Additional engineering support will be provided as

requested however an amendment may be required to adjust cost plan if required.

4) SE-18 Non-contacting Finger Seal Design and Procurements (Sub-task S3)

**************Added 8/27/09 **********************

a) Contractor shall have an existing rotor re-coated per specifications provided by the

researcher. Obtain quotes for a new Inconel rotor based on the existing design.

b) Provide fabrication services and drawing updates for the seal test rig (non-contacting

finger seals, rotor coating modifications, etc). Most of this will be modifications of

existing drawings.

c) If funding is available, procure piping components for the high pressure air line in SE18 (450 psig regulated down to 250 psig) to replace existing line that has cracked

welds. (Estimated cost is $4,500) 

Optical Engineering

Perform optical analysis, design and laboratory work to perform the following series of

tasks:

a) Perform research on the existing pyrometry system as well as new infrared

temperature measurements systems and other systems that may be applicable to the

Seal Test Rig and familiarize with the test rig operations. 

b) Install and operate, calibrate, and test existing pyrometer.

c) Design mounting brackets and optical component mounts for existing pyrometer

d) Specify, procure, install and test new modern pyrometer. Some optical lens design

may be necessary to mount optical components to make temperature measurements on

the seal near the seal/rotor interface.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/067.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

e) Specify, procure, install and test new infrared thermometer system to achieve lower

temperature ranges of interest. Some optical lens design will be necessary to measure

temperatures in a concentrated area on the seal.

Note: Items d) and e) are lower priority and may not be funded until a later time.

*******************************************

5) TPS Refurbishment and Engineering Support (Sub-task S4)

a) All current support activity had been completed in previous periods, sub-task has

been closed.

6) ORPR Rig - Force Balance Refurbishment and Engineering Support (Sub-task S5)

a) Provide engineering oversight and procurement services to refurbish the existing two

component dynamic force balance for each rotor. 

b) Contractor shall utilize NASA shipping to ship hardware to vendor for refurbishing

activities if required

c) Provide engineering and design services to develop and deliver an upgraded

Telemetry system for the Counter Rotation Rig.

**********NEW AS OF AFP6 - April 1, 2009**************

d) Provide procurement services if needed to support ORPR hardware build-up in the

9x15 and the 8x6 facilities. 

e) Provide engineering, design and procurement support to develop interface hardware

for traversing acoustic microphones and related test hardware. 

****************************************************

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

If travel and/or training is required, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

**Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to September 30,

2009**

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES:

Milestones:

********* Added 8/27/09 **************

• Complete infrared temperature measurement system(s) designs, buildup, assembly

and testing as outlined in scope of work.

*****************************

Deliverables:

• Fabrication cost estimates and procured hardware related to task objectives
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/067.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

*********Added 8/27/09 *************

• Temperature calibration and test data pertaining to the measurement systems and to

the seal(s) under test within the rig.

************************************************

• SE-18 Finger Seal test rig hardware as defined by the TR.

• 3D solid models and drawings submitted into the required Windchill database to

support identified milestones. 

• Refurbished 9x15 Force Balances

• ORPR fwd & aft Telemetry Systems

• Traversing acoustic microphone stand hardware

• Monthly Progress Report

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY:

Pro/ENGINEER

Windchill

AutoCAD

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/069.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Technical Representative: Crandall, Karen

Task Number: NNC06E069T - 8

Task Title: R&T Directorate Database Analyst

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 189.

BACKGROUND: The Contractor shall provide Database Analyst support for various projects

within the Research & Technology Directorate, primarily the Aeronautics projects, at the NASA

Glenn Research Center, Ames Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Center, and Langley

Research Center.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: 

The work to be performed includes:

* Multi-media web-page design and development

* Generation of reports utilizing GRC financial computer systems

* Database programming and development to maintain financial and labor information

* Office automation support including spreadsheets, databases and multi-media presentation

software.

The work to be performed shall require an experienced database programmer with knowledge of

NASA financial and budgeting practices. In addition, knowledge of the Internet is required,

including programming and posting to WEB pages.

The contractor staff shall:

* Gather, review, and evaluate user requirements to generate a set of specifications.

* Design, implement and test financial database to specifications.

* Possess demonstrated expertise on the process and the development of the Integrate Financial

Management (IFM) financial database, and be able to utilize that knowledge to train individuals,

as required.

* Be responsible for the maintenance of the financial database to ensure its smooth operation.

* Take additional training classes to enhance their knowledge in programming and web

applications. Funds shall be added to the contract as required to cover training costs.

TASKS TO BE PERFORMED:

The contractor shall perform tasks in the following major areas (see Deliverables and Milestones
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/069.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

section for specific deliverables and dates):

1.0 Contract Management and Administration

The contractor shall provide the necessary program management and coordination to accomplish

the tasks in this Statement of Work. The contractor shall develop and deliver documents to the

NASA Technical Representative (TR) on a monthly basis which describes the work completed on

this contract. The contractor shall provide the staff necessary to accomplish the contract tasks. 

******Edited/Reworded as of AFP7 - August 11, 2009 ************

2.0 Financial and other Database Applications and Programming

The contractor shall provide services in the design, development, and maintenance of an

integrated financial information systems database utilizing the Center's financial system. Contents

of the database shall be agreed upon by the NASA TR and the contractor staff. Programming

shall include weekly maintenance of programs, and reports that need adjustment; year-end

processing which involves closing all records for the year and ensuring a proper financial start to

the new fiscal year; and any new development requested by the NASA TR in regard to financial

data gathering and reporting from the financial information systems database. Programming shall

be done to place the weekly, monthly, and year end financial and labor data on the Internet.

Documentation of the system includes identifying data sources, constructing data decomposition

diagrams, providing data flow diagrams and documenting the process to facilitate the transfer of

knowledge and to facilitate a clear understanding of the extraction, transformation, and loading

(ETL) process.

Build Access database based on client specifications. Track and report on project-related

information. Custom programming in VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) within Microsoft

Access and SQL query solution to Databases. 

**********************************************

3.0 Report Generation

The contractor shall:

* Create, implement, and maintain Business Warehouse Queries. Download financial data from

the SAP R/3 and Business Warehouse. Create and run reports, evaluate and recommend new

reports and procedures. Format and level of detail for the reports shall be agreed upon by the

NASA TR and the contractor staff. Charts of financial and labor information shall be prepared as

required.

* Document all information related to each report generated (code, process to run report, how

exactly how report is run, etc.).

* Archive prepared reports.

* Create and maintain labor queries where needed to download labor data from the GRC financial

system.

* Design, modify, install, configure, monitor, maintain, and troubleshoot database systems.

* Deal with storage management issues to backup and recover data, security issues to ensure

authorized access to data, and performance issues to increase speed and reliability of database

systems.

4.0 Internet Site/Multimedia Presentation Development

The contractor shall design, develop, maintain and update new and existing capabilities of

multimedia web sites for financial database applications. The contractor shall also design and

develop electronic presentations for meetings and subsequent posting on the Internet.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/069.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

specific tasks to be performed

SCOPE OF WORK:

The contractor shall provide all necessary management, personnel, and services (not otherwise

provided by the Government) to support the tasks described in this Statement of Work. The

contractor shall manage the work to be performed under this contract, and assure availability of

qualified personnel for timely response to tasks. Contractor staff members shall interface with

their civil servant counterparts on a regular basis.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables include:

1.0 Contract Management and Administration 1. The NASA TR shall receive a monthly technical

progress report within ten (10) working days after the contractor's accounting month. The

contractor shall include any open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, and technical

requirements), including any mitigation activities.

2. Contractor TR shall meet with NASA TR as required.

2.0 Financial Database Applications and Programming Requests for financial database

applications and programming shall be reviewed, developed and delivered as agreed to by the

NASA TR and contractor staff for each individual request. 

3.0 Report Generation

1. Weekly, monthly, and year end financial and labor reports shall be posted to the financial web

page, or e-mailed upon request, within five (5) working days of financial and/or labor closing

date. At year end, an additional delay of seven (7) working days is allowable.

2. Individual requests for reports shall be reviewed and delivered by the stated date as agreed

upon by the NASA TR and contractor staff.

3. Examples of reports include, but are not limited to:

* Purchase Request Detail for current and prior fiscal year (direct and reimbursable)

* Purchase Request Detail/Cost Pool for current and prior fiscal year

* Travel Detail

* Labor (Civil Servant and Contractor)

* Contracts

* Grants

* Charts, as required

* Various reports for the Fundamental Aeronautics Program

* Other reports, as required

4.0 Internet Site/Multimedia Presentation Development Requests for enhancements of the existing

Internet site, development of future Internet applications, new presentations and postings shall be

reviewed, developed and delivered as agreed to by the NASA TR and contractor staff for each

individual request. This includes integration of financial and labor data with WEB applications.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/069.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:11 AM]

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

SAP R/3

Labor reporting

Business Warehouse

Microsoft Word

Microsoft Excel

Microsoft Access (including database programming)

Microsoft PowerPoint

Visual Basic

SQL Server

Macromedia Dreamweaver

Adobe Photoshop

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/071.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Bilardo, Vincent

Task Number: NNC06E071T - 17

Task Title: Space Flight Systems – Project Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 194.

BACKGROUND: 

Summer 2005 amendment Requested on WISE Task 20050524, NO BID received,

5/27/2005, ldk

The Space Flight Systems Directorate is responsible for a large number of tasks involved

with developing next generation launch systems and the NASA Vision for Exploration.

Projects range from small one-year in-house projects to very large multi-million dollar

efforts from multiple sources.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

TASK ORDER DESCRIPTION: The contractor shall provide Management of Electronic

Data Resources.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Government's estimated period of performance is April 1, 2009 to August 30, 2011.

Specific Work Elements:

Management of Electronic Data Resources

It is expected that all of the contractor personnel will be able to support each other on

this task as well as support all of SFSD's and/or its successor organizations servers.

1. Contract Administration

a. The contractor shall provide the necessary program management and coordination to

accomplish the tasks in this task plan.

b. The contractor shall develop and deliver documents to the NASA MSD TR on a

monthly basis, which describes the work completed on this contract.

c. The contractor shall provide the staff necessary to accomplish the contract tasks.

2. Point of Contact (POC) for ODIN contract
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/071.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

a. Maintain proficient knowledge of the ODIN contract and ensure it is enforced. This

includes looking at and analyzing ODIN trouble reports. This process requires taking a

proactive and professional approach to working with the ODIN contract and related

issues. 

i. Seat management/Sign up for new and/or existing employees

ii. Seat management/Sign up for temporary systems (e.g.: summer students/visiting

faculty, etc.)

iii. Seat option management – ensuring appropriate selection of seat options for ODIN

services. Advise users of the appropriate choices they have that meet their application

needs.

b. Maintain and update Asset Outlook database (ODIN database) within the MSD in a

timely and accurate manner.

c. New employee and move coordination

i. Assist in personnel setups and reassignments with ODIN including transfers of all ADP

equipment and all telephone devices (phones, fax machines, cellular phones, etc.).

d. Coordinate refresh management of systems between ODIN and user. 

i. Provide user with advice for appropriate upgrades. Refresh anomalies will be brought

to the attention of MSD management.

c. Review all ADP purchases.

i. All purchase requests for ADP equipment within the division will be verified and

reviewed for the appropriate classification and/or justification. This task will verify that

the ODIN requirements are met.

3. Support for machines that are not ODIN, NADS, or MA

a. The type of machines supported include: video capture systems, video frame

grabbing systems, data monitoring devices, data analysis systems, data capture systems

with specific scientific instrumentation devices installed (including voltage, optics, etc.).

i. Hardware support for machines classified as NADS and MA will be called in under the

ODIN contract support but this task will provide software support for these machines. In

addition, for machines classified as “not ODIN”, this task provides both hardware and

software support.

ii. Load software and install unique hardware specific to aforementioned machinery.

iii. Install and maintain network connectivity issues with above machines when

necessary.

iv. Assist in troubleshooting any machines after ODIN’s requirements of fixing a machine

are met.

v. Provide expert advice in selection of hardware and software for lab computers. See

ADP purchases in section 2 above.

4. Central Directory Computer Administrator

a. Create/Delete/Manage accounts for ESD employees (e.g., IDE accounts, Business

Systems access, email accounts, mainframe accounts, mass storage accounts, Remote

Access accounts, etc.) including password resets, changes, and

deletions/freezes/transfers.

b. Oversee the maintenance of the various ESD group E-mail Address lists in a timely

and accurate manner.

5. Software Support for Unique Applications

a. Non-ODIN supported commercial software.

b. Custom-written software applications and/or programs.

i. All Software for ODIN machines will be tested in the ODIN test lab before installation

where necessary.

ii. Have shared control administration for ESD Servers. Administering the directories and

application/database environments.

6.0 Have shared control administration for ESD Servers. Administering the directories

and application/database environments.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/071.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

a. Windows NT domain administration

i. Maintain SSFP_LERC domains for lab computers, notebooks, and non-IDE systems

ii. Nightly backups

b. File administration

i. Active Server pages permissions

ii. K, O, and S drive permissions

iii. K, O, and S drive file clean ups

iv. Financial, Grants, Drop Tower and other project-specific shares

c. IT Security

i. Ensure that the servers are in total conformance to NASA and GRC security policies

and requirements.

7.0 Occasional additional contractor requirements include support of ESD's audio-visual

equipment such as projectors, televisions, VCRs, telecomunnications (polycom) gear, etc.

Travel & Training required in support of task functions (such as conferences, customer

and vendor site visits, etc.) is planned under this task and the cost associated is

budgeted in the accompanying cost plan.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include:

A. MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC DATA RESOURCES

Electronic Database: 

Provide development and support for the ESD electronic database of text and graphics

including server maintenance, electronic file cabinet development, user training and

support, data security, and the development of access policies and procedures.

1. Contract Administration

2. A Point of Contact (POC) for MSD ODIN contract

3. Provide Support for machines that are not ODIN, NADS, or MA

4. Provide a Central Directory Computer Administrator

5. Support Software Support for Unique Applications

6. Provide shared control administration for ESD Servers and administering the

directories and application/database environments.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Background in project scheduling with extensive Microsoft Project experience.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/071.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Appropriate background with computers, networking, and computer security to provide

adequate support on the ADP portion of this task.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/073.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Suarez, Vicente

Task Number: NNC06E073T - 13

Task Title: Structural Dynamics Lab Test Engineering Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 200.

The NASA Glenn Structural Dynamics Lab (SDL) and Microgravity Emission Labs (MEL)

are multipurpose dynamic measurement and environmental simulation facilities managed

by the Engineering & Technical Services Directorate, DDV0/Structural Systems Dynamics

Branch. Test engineering support for the Labs will be provided under the Glenn

Engineering and Scientific Support (GESS) contract.

The NASA Glenn Research Center’s Plum Brook Station Space Power Facility (SPF), the

world’s largest space simulation chamber, is in the process of performing facility

modifications and upgrades in order to be fully capable of supporting all Crew

Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Qualification Tests, including full deployment of CEV

appendages. The unique volume capacity of the test chamber makes SPF the only

facility in the United States capable of supporting current CEV requirements and future

Constellation Program testing in a low-risk, one-stop test facility.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task will have two major sub-tasks. The first sub-task shall be to supply the

engineering manpower to plan, conduct and document, a multitude of individual test

programs that require usage of the Glenn Structural Dynamics Lab and Microgravity

Emissions Lab. Tasks will encompass: dynamic test requirements review or preparation,

test fixture preparation, direct test execution, data interpretation, and test results

documentation.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2009 to March 31 2010.

The primary focus of this task shall be to supply the engineering manpower to plan,

conduct and document, the multitude of test programs that require usage of these

unique facilities. Tasks will encompass: dynamic test requirements review or preparation,

test fixture preparation, direct test execution, data interpretation, and test results

documentation.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/073.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

WORK ELEMENTS:

The Contractor shall provide the necessary personnel to accomplish the following work

elements:

1. Test Planning and Preparation

1.1. Meet with potential customers, provide estimate of individual tasks to SDL manager,

and allocate SDL resources to support task. Maintain SDL master schedule on Web Site. 

1.2. Provide engineering support to Org DE engineering and design personnel, in the

conceptual, and detailed design of any test fixtures, or support hardware, to be provided

by the SDL and/or MEL. Fixture and/or hardware fabrication or procurement coordination

will primarily be the task of the Civil Servant SDL facility engineer and/or designer.

Contractor shall support these efforts as necessary. 

1.3. For environmental vibration tests, review customer provided test plan for feasibility

and completeness. If a Test Plan is not provided by the customer, prepare a test plan to

current SDL standards, to document as a minimum, the planned input test specifications,

and proposed fixture and instrumentation concepts. Obtain customer and SDL manager

concurrence to the Test Plan.

1.4. For MEL testing, work with Customer to develop a test matrix of test article

operational modes and physical configurations to be run, and integrate into the standard

MEL Test Plan.

1.5. For field measurement work, investigate task scope and develop formal or informal

test/instrumentation plans, as requested. 

1.6. Work with SDL facility engineer, manager, and Customer, in the coordination of

Safety Permits, specimen handling, or cleanliness requirements, as applicable, while the

test article is located within the SDL.

1.7 Provide technical insight/oversight for the VTS including his components (foundation

review, seismic mass, HSDAS, and other).

2. Test Execution

2.1. Direct operations of SDL/MEL during test execution consistent with the SDL standard

practices and requirements defined in the appropriate Test Plan or requirements

document.

2.2. Produce documentation in the form of engineering notes and photographs, for all

test events and any test anomalies that may occur. Notify SDL manager, within 24

hours, of any anomalies due to misapplication of simulated dynamic environments

caused by SDL equipment or personnel.

3. Data Reduction and Reporting

3.1. Provide monthly progress reports on test activities to the SDL manager.

3.2. Reduce and interpret test data products consistent with the requirements defined in

the Test Plan.

3.3. Produce a Test Report consistent with SDL/MEL standards.

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

Work elements shall be completed according to the requirements of the SDL master

schedule. To the extent that schedule changes are required due to manpower or work

load fluctuations, or Customer hardware delays or changes in scope, they shall be

negotiated between the Government (NASA SDL manager) and Contractor on a case by

case basis, in the context of cost and compliance to project milestones.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Work elements shall be completed according to the requirements of the SDL master

schedule. To the extent that schedule changes are required due to manpower or work

load fluctuations, or Customer hardware delays or changes in scope, they shall be
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/073.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

negotiated between the Government (NASA SDL manager) and Contractor on a case by

case basis, in the context of cost and compliance to project milestones.

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include:

• Final task specific test reports shall be due within eight weeks of final data completion

by SDL technical staff for the duration of the FCF testing

• Intermediate Milestones as directed by the SDL Manager and coordinated with

cognizant facility Customers.

• Work elements shall be completed according to the requirements of the SDL master

schedule.

• Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE: 

Senior level test engineering is required to support SDL and MEL growing complexity

tasks. Other test engineers with appropriate background in vibration testing are required

to support testing at SDL and MEL.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

Structural Dynamics Lab

SDRC/MTS I-DEAS Software

Data acquisition hardware and instrumentation

Facility maintenance tools

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/077.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Dunlap, Patrick

Task Number: NNC06E077T - 22

Task Title: Seal Development Engineering and Design Support Services

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

**** Updated on 8/19/09  

The Seal Team at the NASA Glenn Research Center is currently involved in an aggressive project

to develop and demonstrate candidate seal technologies for the Low Impact Docking System

(LIDS) for the CEV. This includes the design, fabrication, and installation of test fixture

hardware in preparation for experimental testing of these new seal designs. Due to the number of

experimental programs that the Seal Team is involved in, there is a need for engineering and

design services to support these programs in addition to fabrication services. The contractor has

the requisite capability and manpower to provide these services for NASA GRC. The contractor

engineer(s) and designer(s) shall conduct performance-based tasks to help design and track the

fabrication and installation of new seals and seal test hardware in the Tribology and Mechanical

Components Branch of the Structures and Materials Division at NASA GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

** ** Updated on 8/19/09  

The contractor shall provide engineering and designer support to help design and track the

fabrication and installation of new seals and seal test hardware in the Tribology and Mechanical

Components Branch of the Structures and Materials Division at NASA GRC.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

** ** Updated on 8/19/09  

The engineering and design services personnel assigned to this task shall complete the following

duties autonomously or cooperatively with Government personnel:

Mechanical Engineer(s)/Designer(s):

1. Work with Seal Team engineers on design and features for new seal designs and test rigs 

2. Perform necessary engineering calculations for design of test rig components (e.g., stress

calculations, thermal expansion, heat transfer, cooling requirements, pressure vessel calculations,

vibrations) as required for safety committee review

3. Use inputs and specifications from Seal Team engineers to produce complete sets of
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/077.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

mechanical drawings for new seal designs, test rig components and their assemblies in appropriate

format for fabrication. Prepare Bill of Materials lists for new test rigs

4. Drawings are to be produced using Pro/ENGINEER or other agreed upon package

5. Ensure that seals and test rig components meet design specifications and assemble properly.

Review designs for manufacturability, functionality, and serviceability.

6. Ensure that seals and test rig designs meet budget constraints

7. Hardware shall be purchased in support of the program. Work with Seal Team engineers to

place orders for fabrication of test rig components. Specify and order commercial parts and

hardware associated with new test rigs. Cost to purchase hardware shall not exceed $150,000 for

this period of performance.

8. Track fabrication and orders for test rig components through to delivery

9. Ensure that delivery of hardware meets project schedule

10. Work with Seal Team engineers to plan laboratory layout and test rig installation procedures

11. Use input and specifications from Seal Team engineers to produce models and drawings of

new seal concepts in Pro/ENGINEER or other agreed upon package 

12. Perform analyses on new seal concepts to optimize seal designs (i.e., dimensions, materials)

13. Maintain confiuration control of seal designs and drawings

Mechanical Drawing Detailer(s):

1. Assist mechanical engineer/designer in completing mechanical drawings for new seal and test

hardware designs.

2. Assist in performing necessary engineering calculations for design of test rig components (e.g.,

stress calculations, thermal expansion, heat transfer, cooling requirements, pressure vessel

calculations, vibrations).

3. Help track fabrication and orders for test rig components through to delivery.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

1. Complete design manual for Gen 2 LIDS full-scale non-actuated ("base") seal test rig,

November 30, 2009

2. Complete design of humidity enclosure for LIDS full-scale actuated seal test rig, November 30,

2009.

3. Provide inputs on LIDS main interface seal design in support of Gen 2 EDU 58 seal design

review, December 11, 2009

4. Provide recommendations on LIDS seal bulb and retainer designs for final Gen 2 EDU 58 seal

design, January 29, 2010

5. Prepare draft work instruction documenting activities to be completed for LIDS seal pre-ship

reviews, March 31, 2010.

6. Monthly Technical Report: Contractor shall provide a report detailing technical

accomplishments on a monthly basis.

7. Monthly Financial Report - Contractor shall provide a monthly report detailing cost and labor

hours incurred to date.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/077.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

** ** Updated on 8/19/09  

Contractor personnel assigned to this task shall be qualified to perform the duties outlined in the

above scope of work and shall have knowledge and experience with the following software

products:

Pro/ENGINEER

Pro/MECHANICA

ANSYS

MS Word, Powerpoint, Excel

Government Furnished Property

GRC shall provide access to one seat of Pro/ENGINEER & Pro/MECHANICA for use by the

contractor designer.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/078.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Miller, Sharon

Task Number: NNC06E078T - 15

Task Title: Electro-Physics Research Assistant Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 210.

The Space Environment and Experiments Branch conducts research for NASA and

external organizations that require support involving experimental tests. This testing

must be completed in a timely, efficient manner to support the Branch’s many

customers.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Support of testing involving the application of surface coating and modification

technologies developed by the Space Environment and Experiments Branch to support

customers from NASA and external organizations. Thin film depositions, surface

modifications, surface and bulk characterization tests, analysis and reporting of results

shall be performed. Space environmental duarbility of materials, surfaces, coatings and

components shall also be performed.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** * NEW for AP7, as of 8/7/09*** Government's Estimated Period of Performance

changed from "April 1, 2009 to March 31,2010" to "October, 1, 2009 to September 30,

2010"

**Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2009 to September 30,

2010.**

Broad scope of work: Activities involve research relating to thin film coatings and surface

modification for aerospace, commercial, industrial and biomedical applications as well as

space environmental durability of materials, surfaces, coatings and components. Work

shall be performed to support NASA and external customers. Activities include purchase

of needed materials, surfaces, coatings and components and the performance of

experiments and characterization tests, analyzing results and reporting results.

Specific Work Elements:

1. Support research and development of new or improved products through application

of surface coatings or modifications technologies developed in-house.

2. Conduct and support experiments involving atomic oxygen, ion beam sputtering, and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/078.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

simulation of the space, Lunar and planetary environment to assess materials and

component durability. 

3. Support external organizations, universities and industry with experimental

investigations applying NASA's Space Environment and Experiments Branch aerospace

and spin-off technologies. 

4. Apply depositions and characterizations of thin film coatings on materials and

components.

5. Conduct surface chemical and/or texture modification and characterization of

industrial, commercial and biomedical materials and products.

6. Present papers, attend relevant conferences as required to promote the transfer of

technology as well as the advocacy of Space Environment and Experiments Branch

projects.

Travel requirements will be determined as required.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

*** NEW for AP7, as of 8/7/09*** Dates changed on milestones and deliverable. Criteria

are still the same 

Support NASA Reimbursable Space Act Agreements and in-house research and

technology programs through NASA and Space Act Agreement funded efforts. 

MILESTONES:

1. Support spacecraft materials testing through materials aquisition,testing and reporting

through 3/31/2010.

2. Support Fixed Wing program coatings deposition, surface modification and

characterization testing and reporting through 3/31/2010.

3. Support Reimbursable Space Act Agreements with various external organizations

through 3/31/2010.

DELIVERABLES:

1. Reports on Reimbursable Space Act Agreement and Fixed Wing investigations through

3/31/2010

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 20

Cost 10
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/078.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

** * New for AP7, as of 8/7/09*** Added chemistry to background needed 

Personnel with a background in physics, chemistry, and experimentation shall be

assigned to this task. Limited administrative support may be included as required.

Government Furnished Property

none

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/081.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Cooper, Sylvia

Task Number: NNC06E081T - 12

Task Title: Launch Systems Projects Office Documentation/Data Management

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Launch Systems Projects Office (LSPO) projects require sound configuration management

document and records management to achieve its goals and objectives. This task order provides

that support to the LSPO projects. 

These projects will be staffed by NASA civil servants from several NASA centers with some

efforts being NASA-Led and others being conducted by contractors. The projects require the

establishment of configuration, documentation, and records management to achieve objectives in

an effective time frame.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide a process for control of the records in accordance with NPR 1441.1, NASA Records

Retention Schedules (NRRS) and NPR 7120.5, Program and Project Management Processes and

Requirements. Implementation will ensure that the LSPO projects collect and properly disposition

all documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by the

projects as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or

other activities of the projects, or because of the informational value of the data contained therein.

Provide functions for project reviews to be held at GRC including: taking and preparing minutes

and notes of the daily meetings; noting, tracking, and processing of action items; making copies

of needed data, providing logistics, and other duties as needed.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

For the LSPO projects at GRC, conduct connfiguration/ documentation/data identification,

configuration /documentation/data control, configuration/documentation/data status accounting,

configuration/documentation/data verification, and records control in accordance with

program/project requirements.

The GESS CM Team shall perform the following Subtasks:

The Major subtasks shall be supported as identified below:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/081.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Subtask 01 Overall CLV CM Support 

Subtask 05 GRC Integration CM Support

The CM Analyst support for the LSPO projects focuses on documentation management, hardware

and software process improvement, and training.

The Configuration Management Analyst shall work toward predictable, repeatable, consistent, and

measurable processes leading to robust quality management of documents, hardware and

software.

Specific Work Elements:

Be knowledgeable of new modifications and features of the WindChill CM software. 

Perform Project Manager duties for GRC Integration Project in Windchill 

ProjectLink - includes assisting in the implementation, developing folder structure, creating roles,

adding/inviting team members, setting access permissions.

Provide training, database access, and help desk support to individual project teams in using the

CM tools.

Implement the requirements of the CLV and Upper Stage Configuration Management Plans using

the Automated CM tools.

Using the automated CM tools, implement and maintain all aspects of configuration identification

(including the numbering scheme for hardware software and documentation and labeling of

baselines), control (including the release process for hardware software and documentation), and

status accounting in accordance with the CLV Configuration Management Plan.

Coordinate and provide logistic support for Technical reviews as required by Sub-project

schedule.

Update and maintain CM requirements in CM Plan.

Update and maintain CM processes.

Implement CM Plan and Processes.

Implement records control.

Travel, as needed, to Subsystem Contractors, MSFC, LaRC, KSC, JSC and ARC or other

locations to work configuration/document management issues with the NASA centers and

contractors.

Travel to support the Constellation Management Systems Quarterly and CMDM working group

meetings. 

If additional travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted

into the accompanying cost plan or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements. 

Desktop office computing hardware, software, and support will be charged to task as a distributed

cost. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/081.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

The performance of the work under this task/amendment does not require an increase to the

staffing complement of any GESS team member.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES:

Update Vehicle Subsystems Configuration Management Plans. (As required)

Track receipt, review and disposition of Data Requirement documents.

Configuration items/documentation/requirements numbered according to CM Plan. 

Secretariat to Configuration Control Boards. 

Documentation changes implemented within 2 working days of approved change.

Status accounting database accurate within 2 working days of changes.

Final report for project reviews, as needed, within 1 week of review closure.

Records collected, controlled, and dispositioned according to NPR 1441.1 and NPR 7120.5

Provide status accounting reports as new baselines are established and upon request.

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 34

Schedule 33

Cost 33

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE:

Senior Configuration Management Professional and CM Specialist(s).

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/081.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/084.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Technical Representative: Santiago, Walter

Task Number: NNC06E084T - 16

Task Title: Electromechanical Systems Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 254.

NASA Glenn Research center is responsible for providing the Ares I Upper Stage Electrical

Power System (EPS) The purpose of the EPS is to supply the complete electrical power for the

upper stage, and interstage, of the ARES 1 vehicle, except for the Flight Safety System(FSS).

GRC is responsible for the design and developing the specifications for the components of the

EPS, the Instrument Unit Assembly Contractor (IUAC) is responsible for the procurement and

integration of the EPS. The Ares I US is managed out of NASA MSFC, with the exception of

EPS, Thrust Vector Control (TVC) system, and advanced sensor development, which are

managed by GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide engineering support to design, build, procure, and evaluate the ARES

Upper Stage Electrical Power System (EPS).

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The GESS-2 Team shall provide engineering services to design and develop specifications for the

upper stage EPS, including building prototype designs and test beds and facilities as required to

support the EPS development. The GESS 2 team shall provide design and and analyis support for

the Ares I Upper Stage EPS project for the overall design, the PMIU design, and Change Request

impact statements. Additionally, the GESS 2 team will provide services to integrate the EPS into

system-level demonstrations. 

If travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a distributed

cost.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/084.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:12 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Provided design and analysis insight and oversight for the Pump Motor Inverter Unit (PMIU).

2. Provide specification updates for Ares I US EPS Pump Motor Inverter Unit (PMIU)

3. Provide power input for monthly Ares I Upper Stage Electrical Power System report.

4. Provide technical expertise for change requests related to the Ares I US EPS.

5. Provide technical mentoring for Ares I US EPS test-bed build-up.

6. Support design Technical Interchange meetings at MSFC approximately once every two

months.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Services will require electrical, electronic, and rocket avionics integration skills.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/086.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Manzo, Michelle

Task Number: NNC06E086T - 11

Task Title: Electrochemical Cell Component Analyses

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Advanced battery and fuel cell/electrolyzer technologies are required to meet the energy

storage and primary power related needs of future NASA missions. Advanced

technologies offer significant performance advantages and cost benefits over state-ofthe-art technologies. Major projected advantages include a reduction in the mass and

volume of the energy storage system, enhanced safety and system reliability and

flexibility and lower power system life-cycle costs. 

Efforts within the Electrochemistry Branch contribute to the development of these

advanced technologies. Major efforts are related to the development and assessment of

improved anodes, cathodes and electrolytes for advanced lithium-based batteries and

investigations into the benefits of nanotechnology advances as they apply to fuel cells,

electrolyzers and batteries. Advanced analytical techniques are used to characterize and

gain insight into the properties of the materials and components of interest and into the

mechanisms related to their operations.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Perform the characterization of cell components and their constituents using SOA

electrochemcial and analytical techniques. This task will involve the setup of the

equipment, the development and maintenance of procedures associated with sample

preparations and analysis, performance of the analyses and interpretation of the results

as well as the communication of the results of the analyses to the researchers.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

1. Develop and improve proficiency for the preparation of samples and the performance

of the analysis and the interpretation of results for the instrumentation in the

Electrochemistry Branch laboratories, these include the following: 

Scanning Electron Microscope with EDAX

Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Raman Spectroscoper

Thermogravimetric Analyzer

Atomic Force Microscope

BET Surface Area Analysis
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/086.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Accelerating Rate Calorimeter

Particle Size-Analyzer

FTIR

ICP

Stereo Microscope

Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (Also requires development of operational procedures)

GC/Mass Spectrometer

2. Provide recommendations relating to the most appropriate method for analysis.

Perform analyses on samples as requested and provide an interpretation of the results.

Provide documentation of operating conditions and calibration standards.

3. Ensure that the laboratory equipment is properly maintained and calibrated to insure

precise and accurate analyses in a timely manner. Notify government personnel of

impediments to performing analyses.

4. Maintain awareness of 'state-of-the-art' analytical instrumentation, techniques,

computer hardware, and software for material analyses. Specify and make

recommendations for the procurement of new equipment or upgrades. Maintain an

awareness of additional techniques and capabilities available on-site at GRC.

5. Perform general electrochemical characterization for cell components - anodes,

cathodes, and electrolytes. Construct cells and evaluate performance in a cell

configuration. 

6. Practice and maintain awareness of safe operating procedures in the laboratories.

7. Travel as required to attend technical and/or technology transfer meetings and to

acquire training or course work useful for enhancing the ability to perform the task.

8. Ensure compliance with all applicable elements of the ISO 9001 standard.

9. Provide and support infrastructure to maintain integrity of data generated and stored

on computers that control analytical equipment.

10. Equipment/Data Networking Support

Aid in the development and maintenance of back-up data systems for the battery test

facilities and analytical equipment.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

Analytical Support Milestone 1 

Complete evaluation of advanced component materials received from NRA and other

contracted efforts using previously developed procedures - Round 2 of NRA deliverables

complete by January 24, 2010.

Analytical Support Milestone 2

Provide periodic reports summarizing the analytical results on component evaluations as

completed.

Analytical Support Milestone 3
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/086.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Become Qualified Operator on Acclerating Rate Calorimetet - October 15, 2009

Computer System Backup and Maintenance

Maintain existing backup systems for battery test equipment and analytical equipment -

Provide assessment of data security and equipment in a summary report – March 15,

2010

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/087.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Soeder, James

Task Number: NNC06E087T - 17

Task Title: Power Research and Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/5/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 264.

NASA Glenn Research Center is leading the development of space-based power

generating stations. Facilities, test fixtures, and research hardware are required to

support these development tasks.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide the necessary engineering to design, build, procure, and

evaluate the test equipment (rigs, fixtures, load machines, etc.) needed for evaluating

the research equipment as well as designing the research hardware for Constellation

projects.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** *Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011***

Provide engineering to design, build, and evaluate the performance of power system

elements for use in electic power systems. In particular, provide engineering to design

and fabricate experimental hardware and test-fixtures for evaluating the performance of

power system elements such as: electrical power distribution centers, electrical

generators and turbo-alternators, flight or thrust vector control actuators, mechanical

and electrical energy storage devices, voltage converters and frequency inverters, and

photovoltaic array controllers. Additionally, provide engineering to integrate any

combination of these elements into system-level demonstrations. Investigate high heat

flux thermal management. Identify thermal power dissipation and temperature

requirements for the most current electric power systems concepts. Identify priomary

heat flow paths and key thermal design drivers. Enginering will require mechanical;

electrical and electronic; heat transfer; materials and stresses; machine design; fluid

power; piping and instrumentation; design/layout, machining, and fabrication; test-bed

engineering; and management skills. Contractor shall purchase hardware and software.

Hardware and software purchases shall not exceed 100k$.

Reduced design and reporting activities in response to changing NASA priorities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/087.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Develop analysis and model for electric power systems.

2. Reporting Details – The following task technical reporting requirements shall consist

of but not be limited to the following: 

Monthly financial status and technical reports, graphs, and analysis.

Drawings, design review records, and calculations for each task.

Minutes of design and project meetings.

Design archives and configuration control for the tasks.

Final reports for the tasks.

Design and project review participation.

Fabricated and purchased items.

Subcontracted studies.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/089.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Mason, Lee

Task Number: NNC06E089T - 12

Task Title: Fission Surface Power Engineering Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Advanced nuclear power systems are being pursued for various NASA mission applications. The

project has two major elements: 1) in-house power system testing, and 2) system analysis, design

and integration. The in-house testing provides a means for demonstrating technologies and

evaluating operational strategies to support future designs. The system design task includes

system and component studies, thermal and mechanical analyses, and contract review to support

the development of advanced power systems.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide engineering support to the Project.

The contractor shall purchase hardware and software. Hardware and software purchases shall not

exceed $50000 per year.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide engineering support to the Project as described below.

SCOPE OF WORK:

Subtask 1: Power System Testing

1. Oversee operations and maintenance of the 2 kW Brayton Power Conversion Unit

2. Oversee operations and maintenance of the 50 kW Brayton Alternator Test Unit

3. Oversee operations and maintenance of the 25 kW Dual Brayton Power System

4. Oversee operations and testing of the 2 kW Stirling Power Conversion Unit

5. Oversee operations and testing of the Stirling High Power LInear Alternator Test Rig

6. Prepare task orders for Test Installations Division support

7. Prepare purchase requests for material and equipment purchases as needed

8. Support safety permit acquisition and maintenance

9. Prepare test procedures in response to NASA specified test objective

10. Conduct test operations and maintain logbook

11. Process test data and prepare test reports

12. Prepare monthly reports documenting accomplishments and plans

13. Develop plans for the design, analysis and integration of new components into existing test
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/089.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

rigs including, but not limited to:

a. New power conversion equipment

b. Advanced electrical controllers

c. Alternative heat source assemblies

d. Alternative cooling systems

e. Advanced heat exchangers

Subtask 2: System Analysis, Design, and Integration

1. Support system and component studies related to the implementation of fission surface power

systems for future NASA missions

2. Develop thermodynamic cycle models and perform analysis on power system concepts

3. Develop thermal models and perform analysis on heat rejection concepts

4. Develop 3-D Computer Aided Design models for power system concepts

5. Support contract reviews of system and component designs

6. Establish and maintain a reference library

7. Prepare reports that document modeling techniques and analytical results

8. Prepare graphics, posters, models, and displays for space nuclear power

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Oversee the integration, checkout, and testing of a thermodynamically-coupled 2 kW Stirling

Power Conversion Unit and write a conference paper documenting test results.

2. Oversee the integration, checkout, and testing of a Stirling PMAD module with the High Power

Linear Alternator Test Rig and write a conference paper documenting test results.

3. Provide contract review support and independent design verification for the Full-scale Power

Conversion Unit contracts with Barber Nichols and Sunpower.

4. Support the development of a Facility Cooling System for the FSP Technology Demonstration

Unit.

5. Support the development of an Electric Load Simulator for the FSP Technology Demonstration

Unit.

6. Support other Brayton and Stirling test activities as required.

7. Support analytical tool development for Brayton and Stirling power systems as required.

8. Provide FSP layout drawings and mechanical design support as required.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/089.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Thermodynamics, heat transfer, electrical circuits, electrical controls, testing, analysis, mechanical

design, technical writing.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/092.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Dunlap, Patrick

Task Number: NNC06E092T - 16

Task Title: Turbine/TPS Seal Development Engineering and Design Support Services

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The Seal Team at the NASA Glenn Research Center is currently involved in aggressive projects

to develop and demonstrate seal technologies for the heat shield and back shell Thermal

Protection Systems (TPS) of the CEV as well as for a single-use high-speed vehicle application

for the U.S. Army. These efforts require the design, fabrication, and installation of test fixture

hardware in preparation for experimental testing of candidate seal designs. Due to the number of

experimental programs that the Seal Team is involved in, there is a need for engineering and

design services to support these projects in addition to fabrication services. The contractor has the

requisite capability and manpower to provide these services for NASA GRC. The contractor

engineer(s) and designer(s) assigned to this task shall conduct performance-based activities to

help design and track the fabrication and installation of new seal test hardware, rig modifications

and test fixtures in the Tribology and Mechanical Components Branch of the Structures and

Materials Division at NASA GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The contractor shall provide design, engineering and fabrication support for new test hardware

and rig modifications on a performance-based approach for the Tribology and Mechanical

Components Branch of the Structures and Materials Division at NASA GRC. The contractor shall

also provide design support for sealing locations in the TPS of the CEV and for the single-use

high-speed Army vehicle application.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The engineering and design services personnel assigned to this task shall perform the following

duties autonomously or cooperatively with Government personnel:

Mechanical Engineer(s)/Designer(s):

1. Work with Seal Team engineers on designs and features for new test rigs and modifications to
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/092.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

existing test rigs

2. Perform necessary engineering calculations for design of test rig components (e.g., stress

calculations, thermal expansion, heat transfer, cooling requirements, pressure vessel calculations)

as required for safety committee review. Provide technical support through Safety Permit review

process.

3. Use input and specifications from Seal Team engineers to produce complete sets of mechanical

drawings for new test rig components and their assemblies in appropriate format for fabrication.

Prepare Bill of Materials lists for new test rigs

4. Drawings are to be produced using Pro/ENGINEER or other agreed upon package

5. Ensure that test rig components meet design specifications and assemble properly. Review

designs for manufacturability, functionality, and serviceability.

6. Ensure that test rig designs meet budget constraints

7. Hardware shall be purchased in support of the program. Work with Seal Team engineers to

place orders for fabrication of seals and test rig components. Specify and order commercial parts

and hardware associated with test rigs. Cost to purchase hardware shall not exceed $75,000 for

this period of performance.

8. Track fabrication and orders for test rig components through to delivery including conducting

vendor visits to ensure fabrication stays on track and issues are properly resolved.

9. Ensure that delivery of test rigs meets project schedule

10. Work with Seal Team engineers to plan laboratory layout and rig installation procedure

11. Use input and specifications from Seal Team engineers to produce models and drawings of

new seal concepts in Pro/ENGINEER or other agreed upon package 

12. Perform analyses on new seal concepts to optimize seal designs (i.e., dimensions, materials)

13. Support off-site seal testing (e.g., arc jet testing) as needed

14. Support telecons with NASA and Lockheed Martin personnel for design of CEV TPS seals.

15. Support telecons with NASA and Army personnel for design of seals for Army vehicle

application

Mechanical Drawing Detailer(s):

1. Assist mechanical engineer/designer in completing mechanical drawings for new test rigs.

2. Assist in performing necessary engineering calculations for design of test rig components (e.g.,

stress calculations, thermal expansion, heat transfer, cooling requirements, pressure vessel

calculations).

3. Help track fabrication and orders for test rig components through to delivery.

Travel may be required in support of this task plan. Travel costs shall not exceed $1000.

Other cost required in support of task functions is planned under this task and the cost associated

is budgeted in the accompanying cost plan. This cost includes periodic recognition of task

members as part of NASA group awards or for other commendable service to the task, safety

shoes, safety glasses, and books.

"As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities."

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

1. Complete design of seal test fixtures for Army seal testing project, October 30, 2009.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/092.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

2. Complete fabrication of seal test fixtures for Army seal testing project, February 26, 2010.

3. Monthly Technical Report - Contractor shall provide a report detailing technical

accomplishments on a monthly basis.

4. Monthly Financial Report - Contractor shall provide a monthly report detailing cost and labor

hours incurred to date.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Contractor personnel assigned to this task shall be qualified to perform the duties outlined in the

above scope of work and shall have knowledge and experience with the following software

products:

Pro/ENGINEER

Pro/MECHANICA

MS Word, Powerpoint, Excel

Government Furnished Property

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The Government will provide access to one seat of Pro/ENGINEER & Pro/MECHANICA for use

by the contractor designer.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/094.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Geng, Steven

Task Number: NNC06E094T - 12

Task Title: Data Acquisition System Development and Support for Testing Free-Piston

Stirling Engines

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 294.

The free-piston Stirling power convertor is being considered as an advanced power conversion

technology to be used for future space missions requiring long life radioisotope power systems.

This technology has a conversion efficiency of over 25%, which is significantly higher than the

efficiency of the previously used Radioisotope Thermal-electric Generators (RTG). This

advanced technology should reduce the inventory of plutonium fuel used by a factor of 4. The

benefits are measured in the cost savings for the fuel, reduced usage of the limited plutonium

resource, and also in the lessened environmental impact in the unlikely event of release of the

plutonium.

As a result of the findings of a 1999 government/industry Technology Readiness Team, the

Stirling convertor has now been identified for use on future space science missions, possibly as

soon as a 2014 launch. In partnership with the Department of Energy (the power system supplier)

and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (the mission office), GRC plays a critical role in the

development of the technology. GRC has long been recognized as the lead center in Stirling

technology expertise within the government, and now is responsible for many aspects of

Independent Validation and Verification (IV&V) for the upcoming flight systems, and is also

responsible for the development of advanced technologies that are intended to significantly

improve key characteristics of the Stirling convertor.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The advanced radioisotope power systems being developed are driven by requirements that

originate from a range of missions. The advanced technologies identified for development also

consider the requirements of potential future missions and the new capabilities that have become

available in the associated technical areas. 

The effort required is to provide the engineering labor, management, and tools as needed, and

related support necessary to complete the advanced technology activities described below.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/094.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

1. Build future ASC-E2 data acquisition system racks.

The contractor shall be responsible for building several new data acquisition systems. This work

includes the design, build, and testing of circuit boards, and installation of data acquisition system

hardware and software, power supplies, loads, instrumention, controllers, etc. The contractor is

also reponsible for performing rack check-out to ensure that the rack can be safely used to

operate the Stirling convertors. 

2. Support the development of short-term Stirling convertor test racks. 

The contractor shall assist in the modification of the LabVIEW data acquisition system for the

short-term Stirling convertor test racks. 

3. LabVIEW data acquisition system support.

The contractor shall make any necessary upgrades to the LabVIEW data acquisition system as

required. The contractor shall also help maintain a database that contains the configuration of

software and instrumentation for all 10 Stirling data acquisition system racks. The contractor shall

maintain and make any necessary upgrades to the Stirling convertor database.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables

*********July 31, 2009 Update - Modified deliverables list***********

1) ASRG LabVIEW data acquisition system User's Manual - October 2009 

2) Deliver ASC-E2 data acquisition system rack - November 2009

***********************************************************************

3) Weekly status reports describing task status, technical accomplishments, plans and any issues,

due by close of business Fridays. 

4) Monthly Progress Report with technical details of the effort including findings, decisions,

measurements, circuit diagrams such that the technical effort is fully documented.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/094.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Fluent in use of LabVIEW software in coordination with National Instruments hardware and a

strong background in electrical engineering.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/098.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Freeman, Carmela

Task Number: NNC06E098T - 24

Task Title: Designer support for Facility and Systems managers

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 318.

The task was established to rebalance the work between tasks 130, 99 and 98 as a result of an FD

reorganization to better match requirements to the branch supported. 

Background

Systems Managers for the Central Process Systems and the Institutional Systems require design

support to field check and update the system drawings they are responsible for. The Facility

Engineers for the Aero and Space Facilities likewise require this support. The systems and

facilities are those listed in GRC BMS document GLP-FB-8820.1.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Task Order Description

Field check systems and facilities and provide new and revised drawings using Autocad and

Adept. Convert CADAM file conversion into current Autocad format. Perform updates on

drawings affected by change requests to allow configuration to close out the changes.

Additionally, for AFP 7, hire a temporary Electrical Designer to work specifically on backlog.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Contractor shall work to the schedule provided by the Systems or Facility managers for their

respective areas regarding system audits and updates of isometrics, piping schematics and 1 line

diagrams. Effort provided shall consist of working with the systems managers or test facility

engineers to update exisiting drawings to as-built condition and/or create new drawings as

needed. The systems or facility managers will request effort via a Facilities Change Request. The

contractor shall record progress of effort in a quarterly report.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Quarterly Report due October 15, 2009

2. Quarterly Report due January 15, 2010
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/098.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

3. Drawing updates to reduce change request backlog (On-going)

4. Conversion of CADAM files to AutoCAD (On-going)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experienced mechanical and electrical facility designers.

Government Furnished Property

Manual and electronic drawing files.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/099.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Freeman, Carmela

Task Number: NNC06E099T - 13

Task Title: Engineering and Design support for Facilities

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 319.

Background: The reason the task was established was to rebalance work between tasks 130, 99

and 98 as a result of an FD reorganization. There was be no new work associated with the

ammendments. 

The Facilities Division, FD, is responsible for the design and rehabilitation of facilities at the

Glenn Research Center. The Facilities Engineering and Architectural Branch requires additional

engineering and design support to meet their ongoing commitment to the Center.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Task Order Description

Provide electrical engineering and design support to the Facilities Engineering and Architectural

Branch.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW

The contractor shall:

Provide project engineer duties performing planning, coordination, design, development,

installation, check out and problem solving for large projects. Provide analysis, design studies,

reviews and evaluations and advise on issues affecting the high voltage system.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Quarterly report due October 15, 2009

2. Quarterly report due January 15, 2010

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/099.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Engineers with Facilities Engineering and Power Systems background.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/105.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Technical Representative: Hunter, Gary

Task Number: NNC06E105T - 11

Task Title: MicroActuator and Sensor Research and Development Task

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 342.

Present day actuators are limited in the temperature, force, and frequency range. These limits are

traditionally below ~250C, and with corresponding force and frequency limits of 100 Hz and 100

psi depending on the actuator size and design. Often actuators are very large which allow large

force but limit frequency and temperature capability. For both larger and smaller actuators, the

temperature limitations force their location away from hot spots where their use would be the

most advantageous. For example, in the case of fuel actuators, the limited temperature capability

of the actuators mandate that they be placed a distance from the point of operation. This

decreases their capability to real-time influence the fuel flow into the combustion chamber and

thus decreases their use in a feed-back control loop. For an intelligent engine, changes in the

engine configuration are made more difficult if the actuators which perform the reconfiguration

cannot withstand high temperature conditions. To control components in engine environments,

new designs of high temperature, high force, high frequency microactuators are needed which

new approaches, new materials, and are of minimal size. 

The application of Microsystems in general, including microactuators and microsensors, is an

active area of research with a range of applications. The same techniques used for microactuator

fabrication are also applicable to microsensor and microsystem research.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The first goal of this task is to research and develop new microfabricated actuators for engine

self-configuration in high temperature environments. In particular, the nearer term objective will

be to develop high temperature actuators for flow control operable up to 500 oC and in

environments such as gaseous and liquid flow regimes as well as investigation of new

microactuation approaches. 

The contractor shall also use the methods derived in the microactuation development and

available in the state-of-the-art and apply them to the fabrication and development of

microsensors and supporting technology. The contractor shall also provide technical input related

to the state-of-the-art in microsensor development.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/105.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

specific tasks to be performed

********Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to Completion of GESS2 Contract. Base plus 3 options******

To research and develop new microfabricated high temperature, high force, high frequency

actuators as well as microsensors for a variety of applications. This includes the responsibility

for:

o Conceptual development, modeling and interaction with modelers as appropriate of alternate

design structures for microfabricated high temperature actuators in order to determine factors such

as natural frequency, damping coefficient, squeeze number, stress profile and maximum linear

displacement for a given actuator design. Knowledge of computational fluid dynamics modeling

of solid-liquid and solid-viscous flow interactions necessary.

o Reduction of optimized parameters of models from new design concepts to mask layouts and to

supervise the prototype fabrication of such.

o Investigation of the use of SiC materials esp. the high temperature capabilities to fabricate high

temperature actuators, electronics, and sensors. 

o Investigation of the use of ceramic piezoelectric materials and high temperature shape memory

alloys material to produce micofabricated actuators based on their bulk material. 

o Use microfabrication techniques derived in the above activities in the development and

application of microsensors and supporting technologies.

o Investigation of the use of other types of actuators including solenoids, thermally driven

actuators, electrostatics, and magnetoresistive actuators for microactuator purposes. 

o Design and interact with relevant Branch personnel regarding new modeling concepts and the

fabrication and testing of microactuators for high temperature operation, as well as microsensors

for a range of applications including chemical and biological sensing.

o Participate in branch activities as appropriate including interfacing with other team members in

a non-supervisory role. These include in-house personnel as well as grantees and contractors. 

o Other duties as appropriate associated with the above development of microactuators and

microsensors.

The contractor shall perform the following:

1. Model or interact with modelers on the design of various high temperature microfabricated

actuators optimizing specific approaches to microactuation in, for example, high temperature, hot

liquid environments.

2. Design and interact with clean room personnel in the fabrication of a SiC-based actuators and

sensors based on the corresponding modeling.

3. Interaction with NASA GRC personnel in the investigation of alternate actuation materials

including such as high temperature piezoelectrics and shape memory alloys for high temperature

actuation. Interact with clean room personnel in the fabrication of these materials as appropriate. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/105.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

4. Be involved, as appropriate, in the fabrication and demonstration of the microactuators and

microsensors in relevant environments.

5. Keep the NASA technical representative apprised of progress with reports and verbal

communication.

6. If travel or training is required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

7. Desktop office computing hardware, software, and support will be charged to task as a nonlabor recurring charge. 

********** New as of AFP6- April 1, 2009*************

8. Identify and initiate concepts independently and prove their feasibility; 

9. Responsibility , as appropriate, in validating an assigned concept either analytically,

experimentally, or a combination of both.

*******************************************************************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

The Deliverables shall include:

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A: Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects.

B: Technical achievements or issues. 

2. Supply computer software or hardware or miscellaneous equipment as needed for task.

Task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measurables. Revisions, if required, to the above deliverables will be

tracked via monthly reports and modifications will be jointly agreed upon by the Task Manager

and NASA TR.

As part of the reporting requirements of this task order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/105.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:13 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE:

Professional(s) with minimum of a Master's Degree in Mechanical Engineering, Electrical

Engineering, physics, or materials engineering is required for this task. The candidate(s) should

have extensive experience in MEMS scale modeling and fabrication of moving structures in solid

and liquid flow regimes plus a good working knowledge of actuation mechanisms. The

candidate(s)should have experience in microfabrication.

Great emphasis is placed on having excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to work well in a

close-knit team. Excellent communications skills (both oral and written) are also required. 

Limited administrative and supervisory support is also required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

The microfabrication processing associated with this task shall take place predominately in the

Sensors and Electronics Branch cleanroom at NASA GRC. The testing and analysis of sensors

shall take place predominately at GRC and using equipment such as high temperature ovens,

SEM, Auger, Atomic Force Microscopy associated with the Sensors and Electronics Technology

Branch at NASA GRC. Government Property shall not be removed from GRC without the correct

approval process

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/112.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: Jankovsky, Robert

Task Number: NNC06E112T - 21

Task Title: Space Propulsion Engineering Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The NASA Glenn Research Center is responsible for providing engineering support to various

programs requiring space propulsion expertise. Expertise is required in both chemical and electric

propulsion systems. This task is to supplement the GRC civil servant workforce.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Service Module Orion Main Engine (OME) Development - Participate in the development of the

service module main engine. Perform independent engine and component level analysis as

validation of the engine provider's design, independent sizing analyses should be conducted on

the pneumatic pack and TVC. Participate in engine and component level reviews including

preliminary design review, engineering review boards and technical interchange meetings.

Service Module Propulsion Ground Operations - Identify issues and negotiate interface

requirements between ground systems developers and propulsion systems developers. Support the

development of a SM propulsion servicing GSE concept. Specifically, provide an independent

assessment of the design interface to GSE, service panel design, selection of service valves, GSE

interfacing filters and other equipment.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Support the development of space propulsion systems and components. Efforts will include

studies, modeling, hardware design and fabrication, and testing. Generate drawings as needed to

support design and development effort. Publication of work as needed.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

Completion of PnP sizing and requirements definition task. (10/1/09)

Review of PnP valve vendor specs. (12/30/09)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/112.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Participation in TVC vendor kickoff and SRR (3/31/10)

Complete an independent trade study to analyze the benefits and draw backs of implementing an

SM Propulsion tank isolation valve. (1/30/10)

Deliverables:

Monthly progress report for all sub-tasks (on-going)

Memo summarizing the PnP design and relevant trades leading to final design (3/31/10)

Executive summary of PnP valve and TVC vendor procurement specifications (12/31/09)

Analyses documentation uploaded to Space Propulsion eROOM by 3/30/10.

Any models or tools developed should be documented and placed on the Space Propulsion

eROOM by 3/31/10.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

SM propulsion ground operations support: demonstrated exceptional interpersonal skills, fluid

system background. 

Service Module Propulsion Support - propulsion background required, demonstrated exceptional

interpersonal skills, fluid system background required.

Government Furnished Property

Pro/ENGINEER

AutoCAD

NPSS or analytical software

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/114.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: St. Onge, Thomas

Task Number: NNC06E114T - 16

Task Title: ESD/PT Program and Project Management Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 364.

Provide financial, document, web page development and schedule support to ISS and

Human Research projects.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

• Financial Management Support:

o Develop resource plans for the ISS and Human Research projects that will be used for

POP, Operating Plans, Monthly Status Reporting, BMR, PMC and other reporting

requirements. Use full cost methodology that is current with the NASA costing models;

o Provide monthly financial and workforce plan versus actual charts and variance

analyses to support the data;

o Institute the appropriate level of EVM for ISS Research projects; 

o Generate purchase requests and track cost accounts; 

o Plan and track CS, and Prime and SSC contractor workforce utilizing GRC workforce

databases. Input data into the PRD and WIMS, and monitor WEBTADS for proper labor

charging;

o Provide reports and presentation material as required. 

• Schedule Support:

o Develop and maintain individual project schedules, and the Project Office Master

Schedule; 

o Manage electronic schedule data resources, integrate data provided by the project

managers into project master schedules, and manipulate data as required;

o Participate in the GRC Schedule Working Group;

o Provide technical assistance in the creation and publication of monthly reports and

presentations. 

• Website Support:

o Create and maintain the GRC ISS and Human Research Project Office websites;

o Create and maintain Exploration outreach & education websites;

o Develop graphics, interactive programming, interface with GRC network personnel on

web server & network issues, and compliancy with requirements. 

• Document Management Support:

o Provide Confirguration Management of the SpaceDOC contract effort including delivery

order processing, review and approval, current status and updates;

o Maintain SpaceDOC deliverables in an eRoom for document archival;
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/114.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

o Maintains FCF and other project documents including project plans, science

requirements documents, and Experiment Data Management Plans; 

o Reviews and makes recommendations for document disposition and archival; 

• Customer Interface – work with the GRC Program and Project Managers, Headquarters

Program Element Manager, Level II Program Offices at JSC and LaRC.

• Some travel (local and non-local) may be required on non-recurring basis for training,

program/project reviews, and outreach and education activities and events. 

• Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to the task

as a distributed cost.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Government will provide location/hardware to store database files, provide direction and

prioritize tasks. 

Contractor shall provide web pages in accordance with regulations for approvals of

published information. 

Contractor shall provide financial analysis of ISS and Human Research projects. 

Automated database reports for PR's and other monthly charts on financial and

workforce data as needed. 

Contractor shall supply coding of financial and schedule data in order to populate EVM

reports. 

Government will supply travel funds necessary for travel associated with outreach and

educational activities.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The Milestones and deliverables shall consist of the following:

1. Monthly financial, workforce and schedule reports, monthly SpaceDOC Delivery Order

status report, charts and analysis; 

2. Monthly reports as specified, in the GESS contract.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 65

Schedule 25

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Financial analysis with an understanding of NASA's budgetary process, earned value

management and financial systems, including software; WebMaster with a knowledge of

creating and maintaining web sites within the NASA guidelines; scheduler with skills in

developing and maintaining project and program level schedules; and a Document
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/114.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Specialist with knowledge of NASA's documentation requirements and the basics of

configuration management, as well as general organizational skills.

Government Furnished Property

The Government will supply GRC facilities, test equipment, and computers to conduct

the majority of the GRC on-site activities associated with testing and operations of

development hardware and Ground Support Equipment (GSE). In certain instances, on a

case-by-case basis, project specific software items (compilers, etc.) ordered by the

project may be used in contractor-based facilities to promote more efficient work

completion.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/116.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: Acosta, Roberto

Task Number: NNC06E116T - 19

Task Title: ACAD Antenna

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 371.

The Office of Space Communications and Navigation(ScAN) at the NASA Glenn Research

Center is responsible for identifying emerging system concepts in space communications. The

work includes antenna and system concept development, including support of the

antenna/interferomter design .

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide antenna design, analysis, fabrication and characterization of

prototype system interferomter for the Office of Space Communications and Navigation (ScAN)

Program at the NASA Glenn Research Center.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The task provides support for the research and development of antenna/interferometr for the

Office of Space Communications and Navigation(ScAN) of the NASA Glenn Research Center.

For each candidate antenna/interferometer design identified by the ScAN Program, the contractor

shall provide computer simulated results and system characterization of all sub-system in the

design and provide recommendations to the design based on the results obtained.

When NASA has determined that computer simulations indicate that a particular design achieves

specifications, the contractor shall fabricate the antenna. The contractor shall proceed to

characterize the antenna, primarly using the appropriate laboratory facilities at NASA GRC. The

results of the antenna measurements shall be provided to NASA GRC.

Determination of the various types and number of antennas to be investigated and fabricated will

be guided by the results produced during the performance of this task.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Design, fabrication and characterization of two K-Band (20.7 and 20.2 GHz) Atmospheric
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/116.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Phase Interferometers. 

2. Monthly Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor should provide qualified personnel at the Senior Ph.D. level

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/118.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: Ritzert, Frank

Task Number: NNC06E118T - 16

Task Title: ADVANCED METALLICS PROCESSING

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 385.

Advanced metallic/intermetallic alloys are required in future aerospace systems to meet the

demands of high operationg temperatures, high strength-to-weight ratio, resistance to aggressive

environments, and fabrication. The Advanced Metallics Branch is conducting basic research on

these materials in the areas of materials development, durability evaluation, processing, and

joining technology of both monolithic and composite materials.

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 1, 2009*******

NO CHANGES to the task

**************************************************

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The objective of this task is to conduct experimental research functions where the overall

objective and scope of work is to develop and maintain processing techniques and facilities for

advanced alloys, intermetallics, and their composites.

There are two main areas of performance under this task. One is in the area of materials research

and development. Here, the contractor staff shall support, operate, and maintain numerous

experimental facilities to support research-related tasks and programmatic milestones. A second

area of focus are the activities related to the heat treatment lab. Here, numerous high temperature

furnaces must be operated and maintained in support of the targeted materials research.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Broad Scope of Work

The contractor shall perform this task with an objective to conduct research functions where the

overall objective and scope of work is to develop and test advanced alloys and intermetallics for

high-temperature application. Processing-microstructure-property relationships will be

investigated in support of ongoing research teams.

Specific Work Elements
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/118.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

1. Perform research and development activities to support materials research programs.

Independently schedule, perform, and analyze data from experiments designed by a materials

research engineer. Determine, tabulate, and evaluate physical, mechanical, and metallurgical

properties. Areas include, but are not limited to advanced metallics processing (vacuum induction

melting, arc-melting, extrusion, rolling, single crystal casting, powder processing), perform

metallographic preparation (cutting, grinding, polishing, etching), perform evaluations using

scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and in-situ chemical analyses (EDS), photography and light

microscopy. Display a working knowledge of x-ray techniques and chemical processing,

understand and apply statistical concepts to generate meaningful experimental results, create

reports and presentations to transfer information of interest to the technical community, perform

the mechanical testing of materials (creep, tensile, fatigue), generate/write software to facilitate

improved data acquisition of results, perform quantitative metallography and understand several

computer data analysis routines. Testing-related duties include sample preparation, test setup, and

experimental testing in conjunction with developing quality test methodologies. Working

knowledge of programming using Delphi and Matlab. Perform as-needed machining (drill press,

lathe, milling machine, K.O. Lee) including microprocessor controlled machines.

2. Be responsible for the all aspects relating to the Heat Treatment Facility for the Materials

Division. Responsibilities include but are not limited to total familiarity of all equipment

including controllers, overtemps, thermocouples, and data acquisition. Primary point of contact

for scheduling, quality and safety (ISO-related activities) including record-keeping, furnace

profiling, and calibrations for critical equipment. Direct all laboratory users to be familiar with

safety issues and be intimately familiar with all aspects of the Laboratory Management and

Control (LMAC) form. Perform quality checks for every experiment consistent with ISO

document preparation. Develop written procedures for all equipment, both for operation and

profiling. Collect data for each experiment using computer-related data acquisition. Maintain

facility notebooks (activity log, research runs, facility updates, argon consumption and

calibration, calibrations due, profiles due, thermocouple inventory/calibrations, furnace tube stock,

ceramic consumables stock, runsheets, individual furnace notebooks). Backup run data for all

furnaces (archival). Maintain inventory (ceramic consumables, thermocouples, inert gases,

general necessities) and track calibration and profile deadlines. Maintain orderly and safe working

environment. 

3. Act as acting laboratory manager for Heat Treatment Facility and Satellite Metallographic

Laboratory. Assist in the oversight of Vacuum Creep Testing Laboratory. Coordinate all facility

upkeep and improvements relating to optimum operation. 

4. Communicate research progress and results to NASA TR via oral discussion and written

monthly progress reports and to engineers requesting service through frequent oral discussions.

5. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical meetings, technology transfer,

presentation of research, and in acquiring training or course work useful for enhancing

capabilities to perform the task.

6. Interact with and coordinate with other team members and external service providers.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Monthly Technical Progress Reports

The contents of monthly activity reports will be evaluated at the end of the current Award Fee
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/118.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Period.

At the request of the TR, the contents of these reports will emphasize:

a) technical progress in the various specific work elements cited and any specific achievements

and/or new technologies developed in the process,

b) information relating the details of installation, operation, and maintenance of laboratory

equipment,

c) number of task orders processed and associated response times, and

d) an explanation of any down time, date, time duration, type of delay and reason, and the

resolution.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 1, 2009*******

NO CHANGES

**************************************************

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 80

Schedule 10

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

This work will be assigned to the Materials Durability Section of the contract. Progress reviews

will be conducted regularly with the cognizant NASA TR. Any revisions to the personnel

requirements which may result from these reviews and will be mutually agreed upon by the TR

and Contractor Supervisor.

Contractor shall provide the personnel for this task. This task requires a Bachelors of Science

(B.S.) degree in an engineering field with 3+ years of experience in material design, processing

and research. Advanced knowledge of machining of CNC machining. 5+ years of computer aided

design.

Limited direct labor support will be required for task management, project control analysis, and

risk management. These associated costs are budgeted in the cost model.

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 1, 2009*******

NO CHANGES

**************************************************

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/118.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/120.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: Patterson, Richard

Task Number: NNC06E120T - 13

Task Title: Wide Temperature Electronics Applicable to NASA Missions

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/17/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Interplanetary spacecraft must able to operate over a wide range of temperatures. Electronic

components and systems aboard these spacecraft must, of course, operate over the same wide

temperature range. Often a heat source delivers heat to the spacecraft, but that wastes power or, if

radioisotope heating units are used, extra weight and complexity will be added. The operation and

reliability of on-board Electronic components which may be used, then, for deep space missions,

must be evaluated for their capability to operate reliably under under the wide range of

temperatures that will be encountered. This update changes the end of the period of performance

to 8/31/2011.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) electronic parts and flight-like hardware will be identified and

evaluated as a function of temperature. The experimental data will help establish the suitability of

the tested devices and circuits for use in the harsh environment of space.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

1. Identify and perform characterization of selected commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) advanced

electronic parts and mission specific circuit boards under extreme temperatures.

2. Perform thermal cycling on the devices and circuits to establish their reliability.

3. Identify failure modes and degradation mechanisms affecting the operation of the tested articles

at extreme temperatures.

4. Recommend,issue guidelines, and transfer technologies to NASA mission planners and system

designers.

***Government's Estimated Period of Performance is February 17, 2009 to August 31, 2011.***

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables:

1. Document experimental results obtained on the tested electronic devices and flight-like circuits

in a technical report. (3/31/2010)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/120.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

2. Disseminate information to NASA mission planners and circuit designers, and publish results

in technical journal and conferences. (3/31/2010)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 65

Schedule 25

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior engineering personnel with experience in power system design, component design,

analysis and testing will be assigned to this work.

Government Furnished Property

A test facility for electronic device and circuit characterization with the following equipment will

be provided for duties carried out under this task:

1. Environmental chambers

2. Various power supplies

3. Data acquisition and measurement instrumentation

4. Computer station for test control and documentation.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/121.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Technical Representative: Bilardo, Vincent

Task Number: NNC06E121T - 13

Task Title: Space Flight Systems - Information Systems Programming

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 399.

The Space Operations Division is responsible for GRC tasks involved with the International

Space Station, Shuttle, Spectrum Management, Launch Services, Space Communications and

Navigation Technology Program, Rocket Propulsion Testing and SCIP.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Space Operations Division is responsible for GRC tasks involved with the International

Space Station, Shuttle, Spectrum Management, Launch Services, Space Communications and

Navigation Technology Program, Rocket Propulsion Testing and SCIP. The contractor shall

provide Management of Electronic Data Resources; Database design, development and

programming; Technical assistance for web publication of the weekly/monthly resources reports;

Development and maintenance for the Space Operations website; Graphic Arts and Design

services; serve as the BMS/ISO point of contact for the Space Operations Division; Microsoft

Project/Primavera Scheduler support; and provide resource analyst support to ISS, Shuttle, RPT,

SCIP, and Space Communications Projects.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The scope of this task has increased. The contractor shall provide Management of Electronic Data

Resources; Database design, development and programming; Technical assistance for web

publication of the weekly/monthly resources reports; Development and maintenance for the Space

Operations website; Graphic Arts and Design services; serve as the BMS/ISO point of contact for

the Space Operations Division; Microsoft Project/Primavera Scheduler support; and provide

resource analyst support to ISS, Shuttle, RPT, SCIP, and Space Communications Projects. 

Specific Work Elements:

Management of Electronic Resources

-- Maintain and operate the Space Operations electronic database and file server.

-- Provide electronic information security services for the Space Operations server.

-- Develop and edit content for the Space Operations electronic database and websites.

-- Provide computer administration and support for members of the Space Operations Division
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/121.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

including both desktop systems (Macintosh and PC) and laptops, as well as the servers. Provide

support for Space Operations interactions with ODIN.

-- Provide artistic direction for Space Operations displays, projects, reports and logos.

Database Development 

-- Provide services for the design, development and maintenance of an internal, web-based

financial information systems database. This database will contain all elements of Full Cost, by

providing plan vs. actual data, workforce and travel reports, broken down to the WBS level, as

well as roll-up reporting.

-- Provide highly experienced database programming effort with knowledge of NASA financial

and budgeting practices, strong knowledge of mainframe to PC electronic data transfer, and

strong knowledge of PC and MAC environments. In addition, knowledge of the Internet is

required to provide programming and posting to Internal Web pages.

-- Work to be performed includes strong knowledge of spreadsheets, databases, and multi-media

presentation software. 

-- Programming will include the development and maintenance of programs and reports in

Microsoft Access, which uses electronic data from official lab systems including SAP, the

official Labor file, and the travel system. 

-- Ad-hoc queries from the financial information systems database will be developed upon

request from the NASA TR. 

Tasks to be Performed: The contractor shall perform tasks in the following major areas: Contract

management and administration, PC financial database programming, monthly report generation,

Grant and SDB financial reporting, management of electronic resources, web design and

maintenance, BMS/ISO representative and consultant. Each of these major areas is described

below.

-- Contract Management and Administration: The contractor shall provide the necessary program

management and coordination to accomplish the tasks in this Statement of Work. The contractor

shall develop and deliver documents to the NASA TR on a monthly basis, which describe the

work accomplished on this contract. The contractor shall provide the staff necessary to

accomplish the contract tasks. Deliverables for this element are listed in the deliverables section.

-- PC Financial Database Applications and Programming: The contractor shall provide services in

the design, development and maintenance of an integration financial information systems

database. This database will contain actual commitment, obligation, and cost data, budget data,

and workforce data broken down by the various projects with the Programs. Programming will

include monthly maintenance of programs and reports that need adjustment, year-end processing

which involves closing all records for the year and ensuring a proper financial start to the new

year, and any new development requested by the NASA TR in regard to financial data gathering

and reporting from the financial information systems database. Also, as required, programming

shall be done to place the monthly financial data on the Internet.

-- Monthly Report Generation: On a monthly basis, the contractor shall perform financial closeout activities, verify accuracy of budget and actual financial data and make any needed

corrections, and distribute reports electronically via the Internet. The contractor shall provide

logging, tracking, and coordination of financial data and workforce data as it relates to the Space

Operations Division. This includes providing electronic information to several different personnel

levels: Division Chief, Project Managers and Resource Analysts.

-- The contractor shall provide resource analyst support services for the International Space

Station (ISS) Program and in their work with other customers.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/121.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

-- The contractor shall provide resource analyst support to the Space Communications Project.

-- The contractor shall provide resource analyst support to the Shuttle, RPT, and SCIP Projects.

Scheduler

-- Provide services for the development and documentation of Space Flight Schedules for the

Space Operations Division.

BMS/ISO Representative and Consultant

-- Provide services for the development and documentation of BMS/ISO Procedures for the

Space Operations Division.

-- Review and update the BMS/ISO Procedures for the Space Operations Division.

-- Serve as the Space Operations Representative on the GRC ISO QSR Team and attend and

support the scheduled meetings (such as the Center Level Management Review, etc.)

-- Provide narrative and verbal status of Space Operations BMS/ISO Procedures to the NASA TR

and Space Operations Division Chief.

-- Solicit input from Space Operations Division personnel and provide status/updates regarding

GRC Center and Space Operations BMS/ISO Procedures.

Travel and training required in support of task functions, such as conferences, vendor site visits,

etc. is planned under this task and a total of $15,000 for this entire task is available during the

Award Period.

Government's estimated period of performance is April 1, 2009 to August 30, 2011.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following list is the milestones and deliverables for this period:

Management of Electronic Data Resources

Electronic Database: Provide development and support for the Space Operations electronic

database of text and graphics including server maintenance, electronic file cabinet development,

user training and support, data security, and the development of access policies and procedures.

1. Deliverable: Electronic Database of text and graphics Provide security plans and updates to the

plans for the Space Operations Server.

Provide training materials as necessary.

Provide procedures.

2. Computer administration: Provide day-to-day computer administration functions for the Space

Operations desktop and laptop computers (PC and Macintosh). This task will involve

troubleshooting, maintenance, set-up, and administration.

3. Space Operations Website(s): (a) Maintain the baseline Space Operations internal website on

the Space Operations File Server. Migrate the Space Operations website appropriate pages and

links to the Space Operations Server. (b) Provide support to the Programs & Projects PA Office

for the set-up and maintenance of the external website. (c) The task will require use of HTML,

programming and scripting and will require continuous updating of the websites. At least one

training course per year is anticipated for this task in order to remain current with HTML and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/121.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

Scripting Technology.

4. ADP Hardware Management: Provide inventory support for the Space Operations

computational and telecommunications hardware in response to request for ODIN, IFMP, and

other initiatives as required.

Deliverables:

a. Property Inventory Database

b. Accurate tally of ODIN seat count and hardware requirements c. ODIN Data submittals (as

required).

Database Programming: 

1. The NASA TR will receive a monthly technical progress report by the 10th working day of the

contractor's accounting month.

2. Contractor TR will provide any information on potential risks associated with this task (cost,

schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation activities.

Monthly Report Generation:

1. Monthly programming to support month end closing of financial and workforce records will be

performed so reports can be delivered.

2. Requests for new reports, additions to on-line reporting system, and other new work will be

reviewed and delivered by stated date for each individual request.

3. Year-end programming and close-out work will be performed on the financial database to

ensure that year-end financial and workforce reports are distributed. This involves file close-out,

updating authority numbers, carry-in calculations, project/task additions and deletions, and other

year end procedures. This will add 14-21 additional business days to the normal distribution.

4. By the 7th business day of each month, provide the TR: cumulative purchase requests by

current fiscal year, sorted by type; cumulative purchase requests for the current fiscal year sorted

by subtask; labor report down to the WBS level; prior year uncosted report; travel report; other

reports as warranted.

5. By the 10th business day of each month, provide the TR: Plans vs. actuals by elements of full

cost at the UPN level; Grant and SDB. Report; Graphs measuring performance of plans vs.

actuals, by element of full cost, as well as at the total full cost level.

6. Provide assessments of programmatic Fiscal Year dollar and labor requirements, assist PA

Analyst in developing operating plan, assist in implementing the operating plan, assess new

and/or changing requirements and recommend changes, and support Program Review.

BMS/ISO Representative and Consultant:

1. Review and update the BMS/ISO Procedures for the Space Operations Division to meet the

established deadlines set forth by the BMS/ISO QSR Team. 

2. Submit the draft BMS/ISO Procedures to the NASA TR for review and comments 5 business

days before submitting to the BMS/ISO QSR Team, ensuring that established deadlines are met.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/121.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:14 AM]

3. Provide quarterly, or more frequently as needed, verbal and/or narrative reporting to the Space

Operations Division Chief regarding status/actions required for the BMS/ISO Procedures and the

Center Level Management Review.

Microsoft Project/Primavera Scheduler support will be provided for the various projects within

the Space Operations Division.

It is understood that the above deliverable dates for monthly reporting will not be possible at

year-end close of financial books. A delay at year-end of 7-14 business days is possible.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Database/Budget Analysis, IT Support specialist(s), BMS/ISO specialist(s), Scheduler.

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

Risk Management Plan
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/123.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Technical Representative: Dunlap, Patrick

Task Number: NNC06E123T - 14

Task Title: Seal Development Modeling, Analysis, and Design Support Services

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The Seal Team at the NASA Glenn Research Center is currently involved in an aggressive

project to develop and demonstrate candidate seal technologies for the Low Impact

Docking System (LIDS) for the CEV. This effort includes the modeling, design, and

fabrication of candidate seal concepts. Due to the number of experimental programs

that the Seal Team is involved in, there is a need for engineering support including

analytical and design services to support the LIDS project. The contractor has the

requisite capability and manpower to provide these services for NASA GRC. The

contractor’s engineer(s), analyst(s), and/or designer(s) shall conduct performance-based

tasks to help achieve the goals for this project in conjunction with members of the

Tribology and Mechanical Components Branch of the Structures and Materials Division at

NASA GRC.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The contractor shall provide engineering, analysis, and design support to help members

of the Tribology and Mechanical Components Branch of the Structures and Materials

Division at NASA GRC model, design, and analyze new seal designs for the LIDS project.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The personnel assigned to this task shall complete the following activities autonomously

or cooperatively with Government personnel:

1. Perform finite element analyses on candidate seal and preloading device concepts

such as:

a. Elastomeric and metallic docking system seals

b. Other elastomeric and metallic seal designs

c. Canted coil springs

d. Compression springs

e. Wave springs

f. Pressure-activated seals
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/123.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

2. Optimize seal and preloading device designs to meet desired technical performance

metrics

3. Perform necessary engineering calculations and analyses for seal and preloading

device designs (e.g., stress calculations, thermal expansion, vibrations)

4. Finite element analyses are to be performed using Marc, ANSYS, or other agreedupon software package

5. Work with Seal Team engineers to get quotes for seal and preloading device materials

and fabrication, as needed.

6. Present results of analyses to senior engineers and assist with interpretation of

results.

7. This task may include travel during this period of performance. Travel costs shall not

exceed $2000.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

1. Complete analyses on LIDS seal bulb and retainer designs in support of Gen 2 EDU 58

seal design review, December 11, 2009.

2. Complete analyses on LIDS seal bulb and retainer designs for final Gen 2 EDU 58 seal

design, January 29, 2010

3. Evaluate results of finite element analyses of key structural interface points for LIDS

tunnel seals (e.g., main interface, mid-tunnel, bottom seals) for implications on seal

performance, March 31, 2010.

4. Monthly Technical Report: Contractor shall provide a report detailing technical

accomplishments on a monthly basis.

5. Monthly Financial Report - Contractor shall provide a monthly report detailing cost and

labor hours incurred to date.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/123.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Contractor personnel assigned to this task shall be qualified to perform the duties

outlined in the above scope of work and shall have knowledge and experience with the

following software products:

ANSYS

Marc

MS Word, Powerpoint, Excel

Government Furnished Property

  Updated on 8/19/09 ** **

The Government will provide access to one seat of ANSYS & Marc for use by the

contractor analyst.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/125.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Technical Representative: Envia, Edmane

Task Number: NNC07E125T - 9

Task Title: Turbomachinery Computational AeroAcoustic (CAA) Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Acoustics Branch conducts research aimed at understanding, modeling and

mitigating aircraft engine noise. Experimental and analytical methods are employed to

improve the understanding of the noise generation mechanisms. Knowledge gained from

such research is used to develop noise prediction methods and noise mitigation

techniques for aircraft

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Support development of efficient CAA algorithms, non-reflecting boundary conditions and

simulation capability to predict turbomachinery broadband noise and validate the

capability using experimental data obtained in model- or full-scale tests. All these

elements shall be directly incorporated into the BASS code. An oral review shall be

scheduled at NASA Glenn upon completion of each milestone/deliverable.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

1. Submit work plan to NASA that details the approach that will be used to complete all

work elements described below.

2. Extend the BASS code to simulate fan broadband noise and validate the results using

suitable wind tunnel data supplied by NASA.

3. Support development and validation of a rotor acoustic transmission simulation

capability within the general framework of the BASS code. 

4. Support development and validation of a coupled blade-row simulation capability

including the viscous flow effects within the general framework of the BASS code.

5. Support development of capabilities to model turbine noise.

6. Publish results and user manual in NASA Contractor Report(s).

7. Government's estimated period of performance is April 1, 2009 to September 30,

2011
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/125.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

********** NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 13, 2009 **********

Develop and assess the utility of BASS code for predicting fan broadband noise. This

activity shall include the following element(s):

1. Complete simulation of rotor-stator interaction broadband noise using the BASS Code

for a representative 2D benchmark test case. Assess the validity of the results by

comparing with published results.

(10/31/2009)

2. Complete simulation of rotor-stator interaction broadband noise using the BASS Code

for a representative 3D benchmark test case. Assess the validity of the results by

comparing with NASA data.

(4/30/2010)

Assess the utility of BASS code for modeling blade row transmission. This activity shall

include the following element(s):

3. Evaluate the ability of the BASS code to simulate blade row acoustic transmission

effects using a representative 2D stator geometry. Assess the validity of the results by

comparing with published results.

(6/30/2010)

4. Evaluate the ability of the BASS code to simulate blade row acoustic transmission

effects using representative 2D rotor geometry including blade motion. Assess the

validity of the results by comparing with published results.

(09/30/2010)

5. Evaluate the ability of the BASS code to simulate 3D rotor acoustic transmission

effects. Validate the results using NASA data.

(2/28/2011)

Extend BASS code to include viscous effects. This activity shall include the following

element(s):

6. Incorporate viscous flow capability into the framework of the BASS code using highly

efficient Navier-Stokes algorithms. 

(12/31/2009)

7. Evaluate the ability of the viscous BASS code to simulate coupled blade row

aeroacoustics using an appropriate 2D benchmark problem. Assess the validity of the

results by comparing with published results.

(12/31/2010)

8. Complete a benchmark 3D simulation to evaluate the capability of viscous BASS code

to model aeroacoustics of realistic geometries. Validate the results using NASA data.

(06/30/2011)

9. Complete a NASA Contractor Report that summarizes results from all work elements

and user’s manual for the new version(s) of the BASS code.

(09/30/2011)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/125.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Ph.D. in Engineering with extensive knowledge and experience in the following areas are

required: fluid dynamics and aeroacoustics; development and application of advanced

CAA algorithms; development and application of modular and parallel CFD and CAA

codes; familiarity with Linux-based computer clusters, Fortran 90 compiler and MPI

protocols; and experience in the use of the BASS code.

Government Furnished Property

The Acoustics Branch computing cluster resources shall be made available for this work.

All versions of the BASS codes developed as part of this task shall be made compatible

for execution on the Acoustics Branch’s computing cluster(s).

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/126.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Technical Representative: Acosta, Roberto

Task Number: NNC06E126T - 16

Task Title: Propagation Measurement and Analysis

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 413.

Background

Develop an RF propagation terminals to enable future characterization and modeling of the effect

of rapidly varying atmospheric conditions on Ka-band signal transmission from spacecraft to

ground.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering design, development, upgrades, build-up and operation/maintenance of one-of-kind

RF propagation ground terminal equipment to be used for K-band, rain propagation experiments.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Development of one-of-kind K-Band (20.7 GHz) RF propagation system.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1) Monitor the health and performance of the propagation remote terminals throughout the

experiment period (October 1, 2009 - October 1, 2010) on a daily basis or as determined

necessary by the experiment PI. Provide weekly reports on station performance.

2) Design and fabricate component hardware/materials required to complete the build-up of oneof-kind K-Band (20.7 GHz) propagation ground stations to support experiment objectives.

(August 1, 2010).

3) Upgrade software as required to improve the quality and operation capabilities of the

propagation terminals (August 1, 2010).

4) Travel to remote site(s) to repair and maintain station hardware as needed.

5) Submit weekly progress.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/126.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Senior Electrical or Mechanical Engineer

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/127.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Technical Representative: Thorp, Scott

Task Number: NNC06E127T - 14

Task Title: W8 GE/RTA Fan Rig Integration

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 08/07/2008, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20080812 on 08/05/2008, kcm

The W8 single stage compressor facility is operational to support multiple test programs.

Design/drafting, engineering and fabrication procurement services may be required to

support the hardware development, integration and facility modifications. Activities may

include conceptual design and drawing development in support of potential future

programs in the W8 facility.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide engineering, procurement, design modeling/layout and drafting services as

required to support the W8 facility and compressor testing programs.

Test cell research engineering and instrumentation support is required in the later part

of this period.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

*************NEW AS OF AFP7 - October 1, 2009 *******

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

This task was initiated in the previous evaluation periods. The W-8 compressor facility

support continues to be required as needed to address hardware issues that develop

during facility operations. The contractor shall work closely with the research engineer to

provide engineering, design modeling, layout and detail drawing support to develop

hardware concepts to address new research requirements including support for

hardware modifications, procurements, build-up, and documentation. These

requirements may be further defined as the task continues and could require an

amendment to be generated in the future

Test cell research engineering and instrumentation planning support is also expected in

the later part of this period. Associated cost plan reflects a “level of effort” that is

expected during the period. An amendment may be required if work scope is different
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/127.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

than expected.

Specific Work Elements:

1) Task Management

a) Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task; resolve problems and

keep the technical representative informed of all issues. The contractor shall prepare and

forward

to the technical representative a monthly progress report defining the month’s technical

progress and the future month’s planned activities.

2) Engineering & Design/Drafting Support

a) Provide design consulting and liaison to support W8 facility hardware installation

b) Maintain drawing package with any “as-built” changes that may be required

c) Submit and maintain all drawings in Windchill for archive of the latest information

d) Based on actual needs that develop for specific engineering or design services, an

estimate will be provided for an amendment to processed to adjust current cost plan

accordingly

e) Support ongoing research and instrumentation requirements related to the W7 facility

test plans. 

3) Fabrication Liaison and Procurement Services 

a) Provide procurement services to support W8 cell operations equipment, tools and

material purchases up to the allocated funding to be defined in the associated cost plan

for this period. Based on actual procurement requests, an amendment to the task may

be submitted if required to adjust cost plan accordingly.

b) Fabrication sub-contracts shall be closely followed and a periodic status report

provided to the GRC technical representative.

When fabrication and material cost estimates are identified in the associated cost plan,

they have been determined based on the currently defined task requirements in this

SOW, historical data and contractors' past experience for budgetary purposes. Once

designs are finalized and approved by the TR, competitive bids will be obtained as

required by the FAR prior to award.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

If travel and/or training is required, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2009 to September 30,

2010

*******************************************************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

Continue facility support related to applicable research hardware integration to support

program schedule and testing.

Deliverables:

Maintain drawing files to reflect “as-builts”
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/127.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:15 AM]

Hardware or material purchases as required

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Mechanical Engineers and Designers with experience in High Speed Rotating Machinery.

Also, experience with the methods, standards, and practices used for test articles in the

GRC High Speed Compressor Test Facilities.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY:

Pro-Engineer

Unigraphics (if required)

Windchill

AutoCAD

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.

table id="Table1" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="0" width="100%" border="0" summary="Used for layout of

the Banner">
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/130.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

Technical Representative: Main, Leslie

Task Number: NNC06E130T - 14

Task Title: Engineering and Design support for Facilities Division

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 435.

Background The Facilities Division is responsible for the design and rehabilitation of facilities at

the Glenn Research Center. The Facilities Engineering and Architectural Branch requires

additional engineering and design support to meet their ongoing commitment to the Center.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Description of Services to be procured and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide experienced facilities engineering and CAD technician support in the

Architectural, Electrical, Civil, Mechanical, and Structural disciplines.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

SOW

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011.

The contractor shall provide:

Architectural services to prepare designs for renovations of laboratory spaces and offices, layouts

and designs for ADA access into and within buildings, life safety code analysis of impacts of

renovations, and construction estimates for architectural renovations. 

Civil and Structural engineering services to support renovations of laboratory spaces and offices,

designs for equipment support and access platforms, evaluate cranes and crane structures, site

design, storm and sanitary sewer design, roads and pavement design, and prepare construction

estimates for the Civil/Structural designs.

Electrical engineering support with knowledge experience and education in electrical engineering

principles, design, practices and codes necessary for the design and installation of facility

projects. Ability to provide electrical engineering with emphasis on controls, power distribution,
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/130.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

fire alarm, and lighting. 

Mechanical engineering services to support renovations of laboratory spaces and offices,

modifications to water (chilled water, cooling tower water, domestic water, fire protection,)

natural gas, steam, and air piping systems, upgrades to HVAC systems, and perform pipe stress

analyses. 

Provide CAD design and drafting services in support of the discplines listed above. The CAD

technicians will need to perform field verifications and measurements, to review record drawings,

to size and select equipment, and to provide "as-built" drafting to modify record drawings for

completed construction projects.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Quarterly Report due October 16, 2009

2. Quarterly Report due January 15, 2010

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 35

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/131.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

Technical Representative: Romanofsky, Robert

Task Number: NNC06E131T - 11

Task Title: Reflectarray Power Supply and Controller

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/23/2009 - 12/31/2009

Background

Why the project is being pursued

*Updated 8/20/2009

Funding for thi task discontinues in FY'10. Task will be funded throug 12/31/2009 with

remaining F '09 funds to complete MSSE-8 reflectarra space expriment.

This Task was formerly GESS Task 438.

NASA GRC has developed a new type of scanning phased array antenna based on thin

ferroelectric film phase shifters. The patented ferroelectric reflectarray antenna combines

favorable attributes of conventional phased array antennas and gimbaled parabolic

reflectors. These features include at least a tenfold cost and power consumption

reduction compared to GaAs MMIC type phased arrays. This task will support the

antenna operation with the development of a high voltage controller that can steer the

array.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

*Updated 8/20/2009

Remained of task will focus on completion of MISSE-8 power/interface board and

support of reflectarra experiment.

The purpose of this task is to develop a reflectarray antenna high voltage power supply

and controller. This task augments previous work where a prototype controller was

produced. This task will produce a space qualifiable controller that meets enhanced

performance specifications. Key objectives include low mass, low power, small volume,

and fast transient response.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

*Updated 8/20/2009

*Change in period of performance. The estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009

to 12/31/2009

*Remained of work is to finish design, fab and test of MISSE-8 power/interface baord

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

This task will be broken down into a requirements and engineering phase and a design
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/131.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

and development phase. 

The first phase of the task is planned to provide requirements for the controller, by

developing a requirements document that describes the performance and packaging

specifications. These specifications will be developed in conjunction with meetings with

the TR. Design approaches will be investigated, and may culminate into single channel

breadboard systems to investigate the performance characteristics. Research will be

performed in the environmental requirements for the controller, and the design of a

controller built from suitable radiation hardened components that meet the

environmental requirements. Testing with the original controller may be performed to

augment this investigation. 

After initial development of requirements and / or testing, the task will be evaluated and

amended for the second phase, which will be the actual design and development of the

controller. 

Specific Work Elements

1) Task Management 

a) Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task; resolve problems and

keep the technical representative informed of all issues. The contractor shall prepare and

forward to the technical representative a monthly progress report defining the month’s

technical progress and the future month’s planned activities.

2) Requirements Definition

a) Meetings and engineering for initial requirements gathering.

b) Environmental requirements definition. 

c) Development of a requirements document.

d) Single channel prototype breadboarding and testing.

e) Support of reflectarray testing with initial controller.

3)

a)Complete remaining 6 128 channel controller boards

b)complete software/firmware (FPGA)

c)Test complete controller 

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

If travel and/or training is required, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES: 

*updated 8/20/2009

Complete MISSE-8 power interface board in time for 1/1/2010 delivery to NRL.

Deliverables:

Monthly progress reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/131.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

PERSONNEL PROFILE:

The continuation of this task requires previous knowledge of the reflectarray antenna

high voltage power supply and controller concepts that have been developed under the

previous conract.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: 

Sample ferroelctric phase shifter for power supply load simulation

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/133.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

Technical Representative: Gefert, Leon

Task Number: NNC06E133T - 14

Task Title: Exploration Vehicle Mission Analysis Guidance Algorithm Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The NASA Glenn Research Center is responsible for managing the design and development of

the Crew Exploration Vehicles Service Module. The design and development of the CEV vehicle

requires that guidance and targeting software algorithms. Development and validation through

analyses of these algorithms are required to give NASA management clear understanding of

various requirement impacts and implications.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task will perform a variety of system and mission analysis studies applying and updating inhouse trajectory analysis and system modeling tools. Perform 3-DOF guidance algorithm

developments and perform mission performance analysis using these algorithms for CEV lunar

orbit operations. Assess the impacts and capabilities of the CEV to perform LLO maneuvers. This

task will consist of several subtasks including

1) Use analysis and development tools to support Exploration Level III guidance development,

integration and testing of guidance and targeting software for Lunar Architecture missions, 

2) Develop LLO operations database that will include required maneuvers, magnitudes of the

maneuvers and other key parameters as a function of Lunar landing site and LLO maintenance

approaches. 

3) Prepare written reports and presentations on analysis results for internal and external (agency

distribution, conferences and workshops, archival) distribution.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

*************NEW AS OF AFP6 - APRIL 1, 2009 *******

The contractor shall provide the necessary personnel to perform the tasks specified. During the

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011. 

*******************************************************

The government will supply the assumptions and baselines for the studies, and furnish dates and

deadlines for work as appropriate. It is anticipated that much work with other centers will occur
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/133.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

via teleconferences. Occasional travel for face-to-face meetings at other centers or labs may be

necessary. Attendance at conferences to brief the scientific community on study results is desired

but not mandatory.

Support to both the CEV On-Orbit Performance Working Group (OOPWG) and the CEV

Guidance and Targeting Working Group (GTWG) will be provided, for which weekly

teleconferences are held in which the review of working group analysis and software deliverables

are performed.

If travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a distributed

cost.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The CEV OOPWG Milestones and deliverables shall consist of the following:

1. Provide updated global sortie LOI targets database that considers orbit maintenance and altitude

adjust/plane change reducing magnitude of the maneuver requirements. This delivered dataset

will assume impulsive maneuvers. The resulting data set will detail maneuver magnitudes as a

function of landing site 

2. Provide updated polar sortie LOI targets database that considers CEV orbit maintenance,

altitude adjust/plane change maneuvers and Altair arrival maneuvers. This delivered dataset will

assume impulsive maneuvers and is intended to reduce the overall required maneuver

magnitudes.

3. Support the development LLO altitude adjust/plane change databases that include finite burn

effects associated with the use of the SM AUX thrusters.

The CEV GTWG Milestones and deliverables shall consist of the following:

1. Delivery of LLO guidance and targeting algorithms in the form of Matlab code compliant with

CEV flight software standards. These algorithms will be created in support of the Lunar

algorithms flight software translation effort.

Additionally this task will deliver reports as specified in the GESS contract. As part of the

reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open risks associated

with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 35

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/133.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:16 AM]

Engineering support with a background in mission design and analysis of spacecraft and

propulsion systems will be required.

Proficiency with mission analysis tools and software development tools, including SNAP and

Matlab.

Be able to communicate with other analyses groups both inside and outside the Center and with

Exploration project management

Government Furnished Property

The Government will supply GRC facilities,and computers to conduct the majority of the GRC

on-site activities associated with the mission analysis and design work associated with this task.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

Technical Representative: Tornabene, Robert

Task Number: NNC06E135T - 17

Task Title: Ares I Thrust Vector Control

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This SOW outlines the overall work elements with specific contractor milestones and deliverables

required to meet the TVC Project schedule. This task is a portion of the entire project which also

includes NASA GRC civil servants and off-site contractors. The specific work elements for this

portion of the project are listed below. Travel will be required on an as-needed basis.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

1) Systems Operations Engineering - Responsible for maintaining the TVC Operations Concept

Document. Defines the TVC operations for all phases of the TVC lifecycle, including ground and

flight operations. Communicates operations information to the TVC team, Upper Stage, Flight

Systems, Ground Systems, and other operations groups. Participates as the TVC representative to

the Ground Operations Working Group, the Flight Operations Working Group, the Stage

Operations group, the Integrated Logistics Support Working Group, and other working groups as

needed. Provides input for and reviews the Upper Stage flight computer software requirements

documents, the ground computer software requirements documents, the Ground Operations

Requirements document, the Flight Operations Data Handbook, the Integrated Master Timeline,

Upper Stage Events Sequence, and other documents as needed.

2) Scheduling - The TVC team requires experienced scheduling effort with the ability to develop

and organize activities using Microsoft Project Schedule producing an integrated master schedule

to track all project activities and milestones. The schedule needs to be resource loaded and cost

loaded to show phasing of project purchases. This schedule needs to be maintained regularly by

working with the various project leads to gather information on progress and new tasks. The

scheduler should review the inputs for consistency across the different work areas of the project

and generate schedule variance reports. A critical path will need to be identified. The scheduler is

also expected to provide outputs from the Microsoft schedule to keep the team informed of tasks

that are behind and upcoming milestones and deadlines.

The task requires proficient schedule analysis skills with proficient oral and written

communications skills for coordination of both internal project activities as well as

coordination/integration of the TVC schedule with the integrated upper stage schedule maintained

at MSFC. Schedule updates will be required weekly and monthly for earned-value reporting.

3) Provide Mechanical Engineering support for the Thrust Vector Control Two Axis Test Rig.

Responsible to finalize the assembly, and provide functional checkout, tuning, and evaluation of
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

the two axis test rig and engineering model hardware. Document evaluations and calibrations.

Create procedures in support of rig operations. Assist in preparations of integrated testing of the

TVC engineering model system. Support the Integrated TVC system checkout tests 1 through 6.

Update rig calibrations and operating procedures as required prior to Integrated TVC System

tests.

4) Electrical Engineering Support: Provide electrical engineering support for the design,

assembly, and test of the TVC electrical systems for the Engineering Model (EM), and for the

flight design. Coordinate with all of the TVC system leads, contractors, and other NASA Centers,

in developing the TVC electrical designs.

Provide electrical engineering support of the harnessing required for the connectivity between the

Hydraulic System, Turbine Pump Assembly, Electrical Power System, Ground Support

Equipment, Data and Control Units (DCU), and Upper Stage Flight Computers. 

Provide engineering and designer support during the development of all system level electrical

drawings. Drawings will include TVC system level electrical connection, system schematic and

block diagrams. Detailed assembly drawings shall be provided for all harnessing. 

Provide electrical support and oversight to DCU contractor during development of the actuator

controller and data acquisition systems. Specific duties shall be directed by the lead electrical

engineer for TVC, in support of the Production Contract and the GRC TVC team.

Provide electrical engineering support for the assembly and test of the DCU test equipment

required to verify the operation of the data acquisition portion of the DCU.

Provide electrical engineering support for the electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing of the

actuator system. This includes the setup and test of the equipment in the GRC EMI Laboratory.

5) Provide engineering for actuator systems used to control rocket engine thrust vectoring. In

particular, provide engineering to analyze (via Matlab/Simulink) and design flight and

experimental actuator systems; and, analyze, design, and fabricate experimental hardware and

test-fixtures for verifying thrust vector control system performance. Contractor shall provide

design alternatives and prepare trade-off analyses for actuator systems. The engineer will require

mechanical; electrical and electronic; heat transfer; materials and stresses; machine design; fluid

and pneumatic power; piping and instrumentation; dynamic simulation and numerical techniques;

test-bed engineering; and technical management skills.

6) Secondary Structures Support: Serve as lead for the design, fabrication, assembly and test of

the TVC EM and flight component brackets/isolation mounts and thermal design and analysis.

Follow fabrication of EM hardware and provide technical oversight during assembly and test of

EM hardware. Coordinate the efforts of structural designers, structural dynamicists, structural

analysts and thermal analysts. Coordinate TVC assembly mounting and packaging. Provide stress

analysis support as required. Generate conceptual and detail drawings of TVC component

brackets for Engineering Model and flight hardware. 

7) Provide hydraulics systems support in the following areas:

a) Develop TVC flight system hydraulic fluid draining procedures. Consider gravity drain, gas

pressurized displacement, and vacuum assisted fluid removal. Compare alternatives considering

ease of operation, timeliness, and contamination control. Identify support equipment attributes

and work with GSE lead to ensure support equipment is developed with appropriate capability.

b) Prepare descriptions of TVC component change-out scenarios requiring complete or partial

fluid drainage and re-filling. Consider change-out of TPA, actuator, reservoir, accumulator,

filter/manifold assembly, circulating pump, instrumentation, hoses and lines. Identify draining
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

procedure, component change-out, and refill process for each scenario. Evaluate relative difficulty

of each scenario in terms of accessibility, relative time required, contamination control, and reestablishment of fluid fill and air content limits. Make suggestions/recommendations for design

modifications to improve maintainability and indicate potential effect on LRU status of various

components. 

c) Hydraulics System Support: Assist in fill and bleed operations in support of 2-axis rig test

preparations. Evaluate effectiveness of baseline filling operations and procedures for draining and

refilling, make suggestions for improvements, evaluate revised procedures, and update written

procedures accordingly.

8) Cradle Engineering Lead - Serves as the TVC Cradle point of contact for the project internally

and to the Upper Stage for Cradle engineering. Attends working groups and telecons about the

Cradle implementation by the Upper Stage. Obtains TVC information needed for input into the

Cradle database. Coordinates the input of TVC information into the Cradle database and enters

information as required. Maintains the TVC information in the Cradle database for updates and

changes. Generates TVC subsystem requirements document and specifications as requested.

Exports information from the Cradle database as requested. Deliverables for this subtask include

minutes and notes from working groups, telecons, and significant meetings (within 1 week of

occurrence), running logs of entries and updates made in Cradle, and running logs of exports

made from Cradle and TVC documents as requested.

9) TVC RID Processor - Responsible as the TVC point of contact for the processing of RIDs,

comments, and RFAs from TVC formal design reviews. Tracks the status of the TVC RIDs,

comments, and RFAs to completion. Assists the TVC team to resolve issues so that RIDs,

comments, and RFAs can be closed. Leads the TVC team in preparation of information needed to

close RIDs, comments, and RFAs. Provides logistics for implementing the RID closure process.

Maintains and updates the RID and comment databases in eRoom as items are worked and

closed. Deliverables for this subtask include RID, comment, and RFA closure information as it is

generated, monthly status showing RID, comment, and RFA metrics of total number, number

open, number closed, and number with significant issues and monthly status showing the trending

history of each of the above categories.

10) Structural Dynamics Engineering 

This task involves reviewing and assessing the required Constellation and Upper Stage

documentation for vibration and shock data on the Upper Stage thrust cone (where all TVC

components will be mounted). The following subtasks are being requested.

a) Update the individual TVC component design loads for bracket stress analysis and design.

Work with GRC analysts in assessing load definition and evaluation of stress results. 

b) Update the Structural Analysis Plan for the TVC subsystem, including coordination with

Fracture Control and Materials and Process personnel on the project. Structural Development

Plan to include Structural Design Requirements, Verification Requirements, Structural

Development Practice

c) Develop TVC component structural qualification plans. 

d) Develop the loads and life requirements for TVC component structural qualification

e) Provide TVC Finite Element Model (FEM) Development Support

11) TVC Interfaces Lead Engineer

Responsible for being the TVC point of contact for the internal interfaces among the TVC

components and external interfaces with the J-2X Engine, the Upper Stage subsystems, and the

ground systems. Develops and maintains knowledge of the TVC subsystem and its interfaces.

Resolves interface issues. Communicates interface information to the TVC team, Upper Stage, J2X Engine, and ground systems. Attends working group meetings and telecons covering

interfaces. Travels to attend remote meetings at other locations as requested. Develops and

maintains the TVC Interface documentation. Compiles and prepares inputs needed for the Upper
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

Stage Internal Interface Requirements Document and the Upper Stage Interface Control

Document. Prepares updates for interface requirements in the TVC Subsystem Requirements

Document.

12. TVC Test Support Engineer

Responsible for providing support to the TVC Test Lead for integrated tests, such as the Upper

Stage Integrated Stage Test and the TVC Qualification Unit Test. Develops and maintains

knowledge of the TVC subsystem and the tests. Compiles and prepares test information for

documents and products. Resolves test issues as assigned. Attends working group meetings and

telecons. Travels to attend remote meetings at other locations as requested. Travels to observe key

tests.

13). TVC Operations Support Engineer

Responsible for providing support to the TVC Operations Lead for TVC operations activities at

locations such as the Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) and the Stennis Space Center (SSC).

Develops and maintains knowledge of the TVC subsystem and the operations. Supports assembly

and integration studies. Works with facility coordinators and appropriate requirements document

owners to assure that facility services necessary for TVC activities are available. Compiles and

prepares operations information for the Upper Stage Manufacturing and Assembly

documentation, and the Upper Stage Green Run documentation. Resolves operations issues as

assigned. Attends working group meetings and telecons. Travels to attend remote meetings at

other locations as requested. Assists in other areas of operations, as needed.

14) Reporting: The contractor shall submit monthly technical and cost progress reports for this

task in accordance with the ASRC Contract. Completion Date: Monthly.

This task may require the purchase of hardware or software programs for compliance with project

standards.

Travel costs have been budgeted into the accompanying cost plan.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a distributed

cost.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

***Government Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011*****

The TVC system is a hydraulic-based system consisting of two redundant power strings to the

actuators. Hydraulic pressure to both strings will be provided by gas turbine driven hydraulic

pumps. In order to complete the design definition phase and move to CDR, the following skills

are needed to augment the in-house team: systems engineering, project scheduling, mechanical,

structural and electrical engineering design, drafting and analysis and procurement support.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. TVC Operations Concept Document Revision B, draft due 10/1/09, final due 10/30/09.

2. TVC input for and comments on the Upper Stage flight computer software requirements

documents, the ground computer software requirements documents, the Ground Operations
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

Requirements document, the Flight Operations Data Handbook, the Integrated Master Timeline,

Upper Stage Events Sequence, and other documents as needed.

3. Generate monthly 1-page schedule updates and schedule variances report for TVC Project

Manager.

4. Formal submittal of TVC IMS to MSFC US office at the beginning of every month.

5. Develop detailed Operating Plan Schedule for Fiscal Year 2010 with updates for the out years.

6. Update design of TVC flight electrical system by 3/31/2010. Provide updated set of electrical

drawings including connection diagram, block diagram, bonding and grounding diagram, and

cable assembly drawings by 3/31/2010.

7. Complete functional tests of the DCUs by 3/31/2010.

8. Complete EMI tests of the actuator system by 3/31/2010.

9. Update electrical design for the 2-axis test rig by 3/31/2010. Provide updated set of 2-axis rig

electrical drawings including connection diagram, block diagram, bonding and grounding

diagram, and cable assembly drawings by 3/31/2010.

10. Perform two axis rig checkout and tuning, and calibration by 11/01/09.

11. Deliver baselined version of Structural Analysis Plan by April 17, 2009. 

12. Complete mathematical model of DCU in Matlab/Simulink environment by 01/29/10. Model

will respond to requests for health and status data, accurately model DCU BIT check and model

DCU modes including acceptance of ICD compliant commands for enabling and inhibiting

actuator movement.

13. Running logs of entries and updates made in Cradle, and running logs of exports made from

Cradle and TVC documents as requested.

14. RID, comment, and RFA closure information as it is generated, monthly status showing RID,

comment, and RFA metrics of total number, number open, number closed, and number with

significant issues and monthly status showing the trending history of each of the above

categories.

15. Omitted.

16. Two-axis Rig calibration reports due 12/1/09.

17. Two-axis Rig operation procedures and software for system checkout tests due 1/15/10.

18. Updated rig calibrations and operating procedures due 3/15/10.

19. TVC Interface documentation maintained and updated as requested.

20. TVC inputs to the Upper Stage Internal Interface Requirements Document, the Upper Stage

Interface Agreement Document, and the TVC Subsystem Requirements Document are on-going,

as requested.

21. TVC inputs to test documents and products are ongoing, as requested.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/134.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

22. TVC inputs to operations documents and products are ongoing, as requested.

23. Deliver updated version of Structural Analysis plan by 3/31/2010.

24. Finalize flight bracket stress and vibration analyses and deliver completed models to project

by 11/30/2009.

25. Minutes of working groups and telecons, and trip reports are prepared and distributed within

one week of the event.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/136.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

Technical Representative: Needham, Kathleen

Task Number: NNC06E136T - 13

Task Title: Technology Transfer Services 1

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 450.  Work in Award Fee Period 7 will be the

same as that performed in AFP6** **

The Technology Transfer and Partnerships Office (TT&PO) at the NASA Glenn Research

Center (GRC) is responsible for implementing the requirements of the NASA Innovative

Partnerships Program (IPP) to provide leveraged technology for Mission Directorates,

Programs, and Projects through investments and technology partnerships with industry,

academia, government agencies and national laboratories.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Contractor shall provide services in support of the TTPO in the areas of technology

assessment, licensing assistance, entrepreneurial and start-up company counseling and

partnership development assistance.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

2.1 Technology Assessment 

The contractor shall manage the assessment of all new technology disclosures received

by the TTPO. Recommendations shall be made to the TTPO Chief on recommended

disposition including publication potential for TechBrief Magazine, advisability of

additional market research, patenting, licensing and partnering potential. 

2.2 Licensing Assistance

The Contractor shall help develop and assist in the implementation of marketing

campaigns aimed at the licensing of NASA GRC technology. The Contractor shall assist in

the evaluation of license applications and the development of negotiation terms and

strategies. 

2.3 Entrepreneurs and Start-Up Company Counseling

The Contractor shall counsel entrepreneurial and start-up companies as leads are

received by TTPO, or as received by contacts in the intermediary community in the state.

Counseling may include areas such as business planning and strategy, product and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/136.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

market development, and sources of capital and professional services. Relationships shall

be maintained with organizations such as JumpStart, BioEnterprise, OMERIS, Ohio

Venture Association and the Edison incubators. Assistance in planning may also be

provided to other organizations at GRC in the areas of incubation, technology park

development, and development of other business acceleration services.

2.4 Partnership Development Assistance

The Contractor shall participate in collaborative efforts undertaken by TTPO to develop

partnerships at the Center. This may range from technical writing, company visits,

coordination with other NASA Centers and IPP staff and contractors, drafting and review

of marketing materials.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

2.1 Technology Assessment

• Monthly summaries of new technology disclosures and recommended disposition shall

be provided during the monthly TTPO Partnership Team meetings held the fourth

Thursday of every month. 

2.2 Licensing Assistance 

Monthly status summaries of potential licensing activities planned and in process shall be

provided during the monthly TTPO status meetings held the second Thursday of every

month. . 

2.3 Counseling of Entrepreneurs and Start-up Companies

• A summary of activities under this task shall be provided Quarterly to the TTPO Chief

that includes the following information: meetings attended, companies counseled,

referrals made, results of prior consultations, and the assistance provided to other GRC

organizations. 

2.4 Partnership Development

• A list of activities under this task shall be provided during the monthly TTPO status

meetings held the second Thursday of every month. 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The position requires a bachelor degree in engineering or other scientific or technical

subject matter. A Masters of Business Administration degree is desired but not required. 

The position requires a demonstrated ability to identify and evaluate high-tech
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/136.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

inventions including comparisons against existing state of the art technologies and

products, and a track record of successful partnership development and/or licensing in a

university, government or large corporate environment.

Experience in an incubator, technology accelerator or similar position requiring the

counseling of entrepreneurs and start-up companies is preferred. A demonstrated ability

to counsel firms on business strategy, product and market development, sources of

capital and professional services is required. 

The position requires strong communication and organizational skills and the ability to

operate within a highly regulated environment.

Government Furnished Property

The Contractor shall be located on-site and provided with office space and equipment.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/138.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

Technical Representative: Eckel, Andrew

Task Number: NNC06E138T - 12

Task Title: Scheduling and Project Office Support for the Science Project Office

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Science Project Office is responsible to provide the programmatic interface for

research and technology development for NASA GRC in support of the NASA Science

Mission Directorate. Assigned tasks utilize beneficial partnerships with other government

agencies, industry and academia to explore and advocate new opportunities in space

and Earth science to develop, demonstrate and insert enabling technologies for the

benefit of NASA GRC and U.S. industry.

This task shall also provide support to set up configuration management system

components for the Radioisotope Power System (RPS) Office. Components are required

for RPS and project level elements.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide a broad array of support services for development and

operation of the Science Project Office. These services shall include support for program

level scheduling that includes roll-up of schedules from program related, technically

oriented projects. The task involves top-level schedule planning and development which

coordinates milestones and objectives through communication and interaction with

Program/Project Management personnel. The task will involve deriving on overall

scheduling plan, regular communication and technical interchanges with Program

managers and Project managers, and development/maintenance of schedules within this

system to accurately track program progress. The task shall also include administrative

services such as website development for individual programs as well as the overall

Office and related Program web pages, monitoring of financial data in SAP and the

production of reports, the processing of purchase requests, production of presentation

materials, monthly status report integration, and other general administrative tasks. This

task also provides the configuration management (CM) support for the SMD RPS

Program.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** *Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August

31,2011***

Scheduling: Develop and organize activity based (WBS product oriented) individual
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/138.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

schedules for major projects. Expert proficiency in the following software applications is

required: Power point, Excel, Microsoft Project, Access, and Word. The task will also

require an integrated high level program schedule to track major activities and

management milestones for the office chief.

The work will require the development of all programs/project schedules and the

tracking and identification of scheduling issues that cross project boundaries and will

require reporting of feedback on individual critical path scheduling items. For this task all

schedule inputs and changes, provided by Project managers are to be reviewed by the

analyst for consistency and viability and reported on to Office management. The

schedule analyst who performs this work, along with program and project management,

will approve all official schedules.

Task requires proficient schedule analyst capabilities at a high level for independent

creation, maintenance and performance monitoring. This requirement should involve

personnel with proficient oral and written communication skills for project activity

coordination. Also, it is anticipated that additional scheduling support personnel, as

deemed necessary to meet the task deliverables, may be required to support complex

individual tasks as they become funded.

Resource Management: Provide assessments of programmatic Fiscal Year dollar and

labor requirements; assist Program Area Managers in developing operating plans; assist

in implementing operating plans; assess new and/or changing requirements and

recommend changes, perform analysis; and attend Program reviews. Using and

understanding the Integrated Enterprise Management system and workforce planning

and reporting systems at GRC is also required.

Science Project Office Support: Provide Microsoft Office support, working knowledge of

MS word, Excel, Access, Project, and PowerPoint is required.

Database Development: Provide support in developing a web-based interface to the

Advanced Technology Database; develop and enhance software that controls the

modification to and viewing of database records; working knowledge of Perl and

Microsoft Access is required.

Web Site Development: Support of the Office, Division, Program, and Directorate web

sites is required. Working knowledge of common web page development software is

required.

The Configuration Management Analyst will work toward predictable, repeatable,

consistent, and measurable processes leading to robust quality management of

documents, hardware and software. 

The GESS CM Team shall provide the following CM Support for the Radioisotope Power

Sytems (RPS) Program:

a. Develop and track the documentation, implementation, and maintenance of the

Configuration Management Plan and processes.

b. Initiate, process, and track change requests submitted to the RPS Configuration

Management Team within the RPS Program.

c. Track and report all action items from the RPS project meetings and design reviews.

d. Establish and maintain Project Library containing documentation under CM control of

the RPS configuration data.

e. Provide CM support for the Design reviews as identified by the project.

f. Implement records control according to NPR 1441.1 and NPR 7120.5

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/138.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:17 AM]

The following list is the milestones and deliverables for this period:

Detailed planning schedules for individual projects in the office (InSpace Propulsion &

Radioisotope Power Systems integrated schedules, project-specific: NEXT, Stirling, others

as funded)

Monthly updates of above for individual project managers.

Track and report on an integrated set of milestones/deliverables.

Analyze individual project schedules for GRC resource conflicts.

Attend related project planning meetings.

Provide scheduling reports as required.

Weekly and/or monthly financial status and technical reports, graphs, and analysis.

Draft Configuration Management Plan.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Schedule Analyst Lead, Budget/Database Analyst(s)

Staff with Certification in Configuration Management

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/142.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Technical Representative: Zernic, Michael

Task Number: NNC06E142T - 16

Task Title: SCaN Systems and Networks Architecture Project

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/20/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

GRC Systems and Network Project residing in Space Operations Project Office is tasked

to support the Space Communications and Networks (SCaN) Program’s Core Systems

Engineering Team at NASA HQ. This team is responsible for the SCaN Level-1 and Level

2 system engineering and activities which span the SCaN integrated networks and the

future Lunar and Mars Network capabilities. The functions performed by this team

require GRC SNAP to carry out the following tasks: 

• Develop, define, and produce the architecture documents.

• Develop and produce content for the concepts of operation.

• Support the development of system requirements documents. 

• Perform architecture concept and design trade studies.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

At GRC, the Systems and Networks Architecture Project (SNAP) supports the Space

Communications and Networks (SCaN) Systems Engineering Core Team (SECT), which is

responsible for the SCaN system engineering and activities through Level-2 concerning

the SCaN integrated network encompassing the SN, NEN, DSN, and the future Lunar and

Mars Relay capabilities. In that regard, the functions performed by the SECT requiring

GRC SNAP support include the following: 

1. Defining the architecture for the SCaN integrated network.

2. Establishing a roadmap for realizing the integrated network architecture by the SCaN.

3. Defining an operations concept for the SCaN integrated network.

4. Developing a set of system requirements on the SCaN integrated network. 

5. Performing and/or task the trade studies for the technical issues identified at Level-2. 

The contractor is responsible for the development and delivery of the systems

architecture and engineering products as directed by the SNAP Manager, including

document and product development support as required.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

This Statement of Work specifies the tasks to be performed and approach in providing

Engineering and Simulation support to the Glenn Research Center, C&T Network

Architecture Project. The work involved includes Systems Engineering and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/142.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Modeling/Simulation support to develop architecture concepts and exercise analysis for

proposed communications system/networking architecture infrastructures for near earth

and lunar communications systems. 

**********NEW AS OF FEB 5, 2009***********

The scope of this task effort will involve engineering support for SCaN Concept of

Operations definition and scenario development.

***************************************************************** The

contractor shall provide personnel with expertise and background in systems engineering

and communication systems modeling. The contractor shall use model and simulation

results perform evaluations aimed at predicting system performance. The contractor shall

provide requirements reports and systems definition documentation as part of this task

effort.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Subtask 1: SCaN

The contractor shall be responsible for the following system engineering and architecture

product deliverables:

1. Upgrades, enhancements, maintenance of the SCaN Architecture Definition

Documents (ADDs) and products.

• Provide technical information research/reports to assist with ADD updates.

2. The Operations Concept Document products for the SCaN Program

• Participate in SCaN Concept of Operations discussions and meetings

• Create ConOps analysis, diagrams, text products (including documentation) related to

the operational features and operational scenarios of the SCaN Integrated Network

• Integrate and respond to comments on the full SCaN Concept of Operations document

• Travel may be required to support this effort

3. Provide reports for assigned architecture trade studies.

4. The SCaN Level-2 system requirements products (SRD).

5. Providing inputs, reviews and analysis to the SCaN System Engineering products

Subtask 2: Earth Science

1. Provide monthly activity reports in the format provided by ESM Systems Engineer

through October 31, 2009.

2. Provide Presentation packages through October 31, 2009.

3. Attend approximately 4 working group meetings at JPL in Pasadena, Ca. to meet

reporting Deliverables.

4. Provide GESS-2 Task Monthly reports 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 25

Schedule 50

Cost 25
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/142.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Communications Engineering, Communications System Engineering, Task/Project

Management and Product Integration Support.

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/144.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Technical Representative: Seablom, Kirk

Task Number: NNC06E144T - 14

Task Title: CEV Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 463.

Assist the CEV Project Office in implementing tasks assigned by the CEV program.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide support to the PP&C Office in the CEVPO. Primary responsibities are resource

management, including resource planning, monitoring, and evaluation of project status

from a business management point of view, including EVM. Multi-personnel team shall

be proactive in getting the required information from the CEV team. Unique knowledge

in business management tools such as Microsoft Project, Primavera, NASA financial

systems and the capability to provide database programming support for generation of

custom fincial reports to the CEV program is required. The Orion Project Office is divided

into the following work groups: Service Module, SET, and the remaining office work falls

under the umbrella of GRC Orion Project Office. The GRC PP&C Office of which this work

falls under is supported by a mix of SSC's provided under this SOW The SSC support for

resource analyst is also responsible for overall resource roll-up of Orion resources

provided to GRC. 

****** Provide expert support in the modification, testing, disassemble and shipping of

the PSL heater in support of the Orion 80-AS testing task*****

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Contractor **shall** set up reporting of monthly PR's, labor and automating our charts

for the internal reviews with the workpackage managers. Contractor ***shall*** also be

automating actuals and providing data for EVM.

Anticipated Travel: One trip to JSC each month, one trip to Denver each month.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include the following:

• Monthly report(s) to each of the work-package managers and office management on

current financial and schedule status.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/144.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

• Automated database reports for PR's and other monthly charts on financial and

workforce data as needed.

• Coding of financial and schedule data in order to populate EVM reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 20

Schedule 40

Cost 40

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Budget Analyst, Database Programmer, Schedule Analyst

******* Expertice in Stahl heater assembly and utilization

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/147.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Technical Representative: Grady, Joseph

Task Number: NNC06E147T - 12

Task Title: Ceramic Materials and Composites II

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 470.

The Ceramics Branch within the Structures and Materials Division is actively pursuing the

development and characterization of ceramic and ceramic matrix composites for airframe, power,

and propulsion systems for aeronautic and space applications. Major areas of research activities

are broken into four subtasks; Processing, Joining and Repair; Modeling; Design; and, Model

Validation and Characterization. 

This task is synergistic with task 021. It is administered separately to address the distinct needs of

various funding projects at NASA.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Subtask 01: Processing, Joining and Repair

A major area of emphasis is the processing, joining and repair of ceramics and composites in

advanced airframe, aeropropulsion and power systems. Advanced ceramic material processing is a

key technology for both structural and functional systems. For example, monolithic ceramics and

ceramic matrix composites have been identified as key to hot structures for advanced subsonic

(fixed and rotary wing), supersonic and hypersonics engines, and spacecraft propulsion and

airframe systems. Likewise, ceramic membranes are a key element of solid oxide fuel cells and

ceramic piezoelectric and thermoelectric materials hold promise as for power harvesting and high

temperature sensors and actuators. This task consists of engineering support for the processing,

joining and repair of ceramic and ceramic matrix composites and constituents. This includes

practicing conventional and practicing and investigating advanced processing techniques and for

bulk materials and structures, fibers, matrices, joints, membranes and coatings.

Subtask 02: Modeling

The emphasis is on process, design and life modeling of ceramic and ceramic matrix composite

materials. The materials may be structural (e.g., hot structural components) or functional (e.g.,

fuel cell membranes, piezoelectrics, thermoelectrics). The task will develop process, design and

life models. The models may be analytical or experimentally based. For example, process

modeling may combine analytically derived thermal treatment conditions with variations explored

via experimental iterations. The work will be performed in a team environment in collaboration

with several other researchers working in this area and in conjunction with the processing and

model validation subtasks. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/147.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Subtask 03: Design

The emphasis is on the design of ceramic and non-ceramic structures and devices. Examples of

design activities include: advanced airframe or propulsion system structural concepts fabricated of

ceramic materials; advanced multifunctional hot structures with power harvesting features; and

fixtures for testing and instrumenting ceramic materials and structures. 

Subtask 04: Model Validation and Characterization

The emphasis is on validation of models through experiments. The validation work is conducted

by microstructural, mechanical, thermomechanical, chemical and electrochemical

characterization. The materials may be structural (e.g., hot structural components) or functional

(e.g., fuel cell membranes, piezoelectrics, thermoelectrics). This is performed in a team

environment in collaboration with several other researchers working in this area and in

conjunction with the processing and modeling subtasks.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Subtask 1: Processing, Joining and Repair

In general, the primary emphasis is the processing, joining and repair of ceramics and composites.

The contractor shall provide the technical expertise necessary to (1) process ceramic and ceramic

matrix composites, (2) develop fiber coatings for composites, (3) to identify fibers and coatings

for advanced composites, and (4) coordinate and perform mechanical and microstructural testing

and analysis.

Specific Work Elements

1. Identify advanced ceramic material processing concepts at the constituent and/or composite

levels.

2. Establish process feasibility and optimized processing, joining and repair techniques for bulk

ceramic, ceramic membrane, ceramic coatings, and ceramic matrix composites.

3. Document and report results via patents, monthly reports, topical reports for publication and

presentations at project reviews and technical meetings.

Subtask 02: Modeling

In general, the primary emphasis of this work is process, design and life modeling of ceramic and

ceramic matrix composite materials. The contractor will provide the technical expertise necessary

to develop process, design and life models for ceramic and ceramic matrix composite materials.

The materials may be structural (e.g., hot structural components) or functional (e.g., fuel cell

membranes, piezoelectrics, thermoelectrics). The models may be analytical or experimentally

based. 

Specific Work Elements

1. Develop process models for fabricating ceramic and ceramic matrix composites from polymer

precursor materials. 

2. Document and report results via patents, monthly reports, topical reports for publication and

presentations at project reviews and technical meetings.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/147.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Subtask 03: Design

The emphasis is on the design of ceramic and non-ceramic structures and devices. Examples of

design activities include: advanced airframe or propulsion system structural concepts fabricated of

ceramic materials; advanced multifunctional hot structures with power harvesting features; and

fixtures for testing and instrumenting ceramic materials and structures. 

Specific Work Elements

1. Develop designs for ceramic and ceramic matrix composites structures and devices.

2. Document and report results via patents, monthly reports, topical reports for publication and

presentations at project reviews and technical meetings.

Subtask 04: Model Validation and Characterization

The emphasis is on validation of models through experiments. The validation work is conducted

by microstructural, mechanical, thermomechanical, chemical and electrochemical

characterization. The materials may be structural (e.g., hot structural components) or functional

(e.g., fuel cell membranes, piezoelectrics, thermoelectrics). This is performed in a team

environment in collaboration with several other researchers working in this area and in

conjunction with the processing and modeling subtasks. 

Specific Work Elements

1. Conduct validation testing and characterization for ceramic and ceramic matrix composite

materials, structures, and devices.

2. Document and report results via patents, monthly reports, topical reports for publication and

presentations at project reviews and technical meetings.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

All Subtasks:

1. Monthly Technical Progress Reports. The contents of the monthly reports are evaluated at the

end of the 6 month award fee period. The contents of these reports should emphasize the

following for technicians:

a) Technical support work performed including research activity, effort level, status, and research

engineer.

b) Facility issues such as equipment operation, maintenance, calibration activities, downtime, and

facility or equipment needs.

c) General issues related to work, progress, schedules, etc. 

Professionals will emphasize: 

a) Technical progress, program status, research planning, and related issues, which may impact

work. 

b) Papers, patents, presentations, and travel completed/planned. 

c) Any facility, support, and other issues/needs.

Subtask 01: CMC Development

1.Continue to develop processing techniques for ceramic and ceramic composites 

Subtask 02: Ceramic Materials Modeling
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/147.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

1.Continue to develop process models for ceramics and ceramic matrix composites 

Subtask 03: Design of Ceramic Materials and Supporting Elements 

1. Coordinate and participate in GRC advanced concepts testing and evaluation. (on-going)

Subtask 04: Model Validation and Characterization

1. Continue to perform model validation of ceramic and ceramic composite materials. 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 20

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

This work will be assigned to the Materials Durability Section of the contractor. Progress reviews

will be conducted regularly with the cognizant NASA TR. Any revisions to the personnel

requirements which may result from these reviews and will be mutually agreed upon by the TR

and Contractor supervisor. 

Contractor shall provide the necessary professionals to perform the task: 

Subtask 01 will involve professionals with appropriate experience in ceramic processing and

joining and repair techniques. 

Subtask 02 will involve professionals with appropriate experience in process modeling and life

modeling. Individuals with design experience, particularly with ceramic materials is desired. The

work may require the guidance of professional with a Ph. D. degree in chemistry or materials

science. In addition a professional with a B.S. in materials science and ceramic engineering, or an

associate degree with significant relevant experience is desired.

Subtask 03 will require individuals with mechanical aptitude and at least 10 years experience or

an engineering degree and 2-3 years of experience. A background in working with ceramic

material is preferred. Appropriate experience in designing of test hardware is desired. 

Subtask 04. The professionals assigned to this task will have the appropriate experience in general

materials validation testing, designing of engine testing hardware, and skill in coordinating the

efforts of a diverse group of technical staff is desired The individual(s) assigned to this task will

have the appropriate experience in general materials testing, designing of test hardware, ceramic

processing and working knowledge of Labview data acquisition software. Additionally, the

individual will have familiarity with thermogravimetric analysis equipment and techniques.

Limited direct labor support will be required for task management, administrative support, project

control analysis, and risk management will be required. These associated costs are also budgeted

in the cost model
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/147.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Government Furnished Property

The government will provide, for the specific work elements listed above, the laboratory

equipment, facilities, and supplies necessary to conduct the task. This includes collocated office

space and furnishings.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/149.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Technical Representative: Lee, Chi-Ming

Task Number: NNC06E149T - 13

Task Title: Combustion Emissions Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 472.

To develop future ultra-low-emission combustion systems demands research efforts on advance

concepts of fuel injector design and combustor tests ranging from flame tube to sector at

extremely high pressure environment (up to 900 psi). Critical steps include conduct of

performance and emissions test with real-time data analysis, and thorough analysis of data after

tests. Development of advanced measurement systems is a must for both monitoring the

combustor performance and analyzing the combustion emissions

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall define research test plans, coordinate them with customers, conduct NASA

GRC combustor rig tests, and analyze performance, acoustic, and emissions data to advance

knowledge on new combustor concepts and designs. The contractor shall also conduct field

aircraft engine gaseous emissions measurements to anchor the engine performance correlation

with ambient conditions that will provide the foundation to improve the understanding of aircraft

particulate emissions. In addition, the contractor shall evaluate new methodologies and develop

non-intrusive emissions measurement systems and apply these systems to GRC research

combustion rigs for combustor performance and emissions research related to advanced

propulsion systems for the present and future aeronautic programs. The contractor 

shall be responsible for coordinating in-house, NASA customer research efforts.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

1. Due to the severity of the operating conditions, ongoing (real-time?) analysis is required to

provide data fidelity and ensure safety of the research hardware. Determines necessary design

modifications for improving the performance or durability of research hardware.

2. Analyze data, extracts design principles, compares experimental results with theoretical

analysis, develops new theories.

2a. Resolve existing combustor EI NOx correlations and expand to include other emissions

correlations e.g. EI HC, EI CO, etc.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/149.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

3. Setup, test and calibrate laser and detector system to measure soot in a flame burner using

lasers, PMTs and CCD cameras, configure and install optical train, setup and install data

collection system.

4. Conduct tests for different combustors for advanced engine research programs. Determine the

test matrix for all operating conditions.

5. Analyze the test system to ensure the data fidelity and safety of the research hardware for each

test run, and analyze and process the performance and emission data of each combustor test.

6. Configure, and install optical train, setup and install data collection system for soot

measurements and demonstrate satisfactory operation for the system.

7. Perform combustion exhaust emissions research. Conduct gaseous emissions tests with

different measurement methodologies including procedures defined by SAE ARP and regulated

by ICAO and FAA, and alternative approach proposed to SAE E-31 for consideration of future

ARP

8. Develop a transportable conventional gaseous emissions system to measure regulated gaseous

emissions for test rig and field measurements

9. Develop a transportable multi-gas measurement system (based on FTIR) to measure regulated

gaseous emissions and multiple hydrocarbon species for test rig and field measurements

10. Plan and conduct experiments relating to in-house and customer combustor code validation

efforts. Coordinate activities with in-house and customer researchers.

11. Write reports and travel in accord with requirements for participation in field measurements,

coordination and data comparison meetings/workshops, and presentations of papers in technical

conferences, attendance at technical and/or technology transfer meetings, presentations of

research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful for enhancing capabilities in

performing the task.

Travel as required for training, contacting with engine companies' engineers and meetings.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Monthly progress reports which shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects.

B. Technical achievements or issues.

2. Computer hardware and software, and miscellaneous equipment and optics as required for

experimental data acquisition and analysis.

A Task review will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measurables. Revisions, if required, to the above performance based

deliverables will be tracked via monthly reports and modifications will be jointly agreed upon by

the Task Manager and the TR as they relate to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including and mitigation

activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/149.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:18 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 5

Schedule 90

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The contractor shall provide the necessary personnel with a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering with

a minimum of 20 years experience in experimental combustion research.

Limited administrative and supervisory support is required for this task.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/150.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Technical Representative: Crandall, Karen

Task Number: NNC06E150T - 15

Task Title: Programmatic Conference Support & Technical Writing

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 473.

This work was spun out of GESS Task 025 in June 2005 in order to better identify and track

conference related expenditures.

This task is being used to provide conference/logistic support to a variety of NASA

programs/offices including the Aeronautics Programs, the Research and Technology Directorate

following NASA published guidelines and to provide technical writing for Center publications,

award submittals, outreach materials and other technical submittal packages as required.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Conference/Workshop Logistics Coordinator

-- Provide overall logistics coordination

-- Provide detailed financial requirements for each conference/workshop/meeting

-- Coordinate contract negotiations with hotel or other site locations

-- Work with technical and organizational leads to determine event scope/strategy

-- Coordinate required logistic support 

-- Procure conference/workshop materials for example: awards, signs, pamphlets, and incidental

office supplies used in support of the task (cds/dvds, badges, colored toner cartridges, special

paper if required, etc.) 

-- To support meetings and conferences held locally, limited purchases of audio visual equipment

may be required to save the government money over the life of the task as daily rental costs are

prohibitively high

-- Provide initial estimate and final report for each conference/workshop 

-- Include a lessons learned section in the final report for each large event, over 100 attendees

-- Compile an annual lessons learned document to cover all other events supported

-- Provide real-time troubleshooting and event facilitation

Workshop and Conference Support/Staffer

-- Develop and maintain credit card payment capability

-- Maintain interface capability with existing GRC conference web registration site 

-- Provide day-of-event registration support for credit cards

-- Suggest improvements to overall system as technological, event type, and organizational

changes occur
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/150.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Technical Writer

-- Generate organizations' final input to NASA HQ's Annual Reports and Center's Strategic

Implementation Plans, R&T Annual Reports, and other technical publications

-- Serve as supported organizations' focal point for award packages, nominations, etc.

-- Facilitate award presentations 

-- Serve as a coordinator and facilitator for Center-wide TGIR Award nominations, selection and

submittal of final award packages to NASA HQ

-- Provide web content and consultation for organizations' websites

Outreach Liaison

-- Produce and distribute promotional material for organizations supported

-- Facilitate team participation/presence in external and internal events

-- Facilitate appropriate and timely responses to internal customer and external partner requests

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall:

Provide technical writing, events coordination and corresponding logistic support.

The government will provide the requirements for the tasks, parameters/guidelines to bound the

work and the technical interaction with the appropriate project people to obtain the required

project information to complete the tasks.

The contractor shall provide the expertise to accomplish the tasks within the budget specified and

the timeframe required.

Travel and training will be required to support these tasks.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The Milestones and Deliverables are as follows:

1. Coordination of the logistics for Aeronautics Program meetings and other required workshops

and conferences.

2. Documentation of final expenditures for conferences/workshops/meetings, including, for large

events over 100 attendees, a section on lessons learned.

3. Compilation of an annual lessons learned document to cover all other events supported.

4. Coordination of external award nomination packages for supported organizations.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/150.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Performance 70

Schedule 10

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Being able to support a variety of NASA Programs/Projects and Mission Directorates, across and

within the Centers.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/154.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Technical Representative: Steele, Gynelle

Task Number: NNC06E154T - 12

Task Title: SBIR Program Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 486.

The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer

Programs (STTR) both seek to encourage private sector commercialization of innovations

and, whenever possible, support and encourage minority and disadvantaged businesses.

Each of the eleven government agencies administers its own individual SBIR/STTR

programs while adhering to the guidelines established by the U.S. Small Business

Administration. 

The SBIR Program is administered through an annual solicitation for proposals. Funding

is provided by allocating 2.5% of each agency’s extramural research and development

budget for SBIR. 

The STTR Program is similar in structure to the SBIR Program. The STTR Program,

authorized until 2009, receives at least 0.3% of the agency’s extramural research and

development budget. However, it is up to the small business and its partnering research

institution to decide how any intellectual property will be shared between them. 

Both SBIR and STTR Programs are valuable at the NASA Glenn Research Center and for

small businesses. For NASA Glenn Research Center, they provide innovations to enhance

and complement research and technology in critical mission areas. For businesses, they

provide a low-risk way to develop and commercialize innovations.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Administrative support for the SBIR/STTR program to include drafting of the annual

project schedule for approval by GRC; assistance in coordination of proposals reviews,

technical analyses of proposals, preparation of documentation of each critical process

step, and development of required reports and presentations supporting the function of

technology integration manager for GRC.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor is responsible for providing administrative and technical support for

execution of the SBIR/STTR program beginning with delivery of a draft work plan with

critical milestones and timelines consistent with the established program schedule with

particular emphasis on the technology integration management responsibilities set forth

by the Level 2 SBIR Program Management Office.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/154.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables:

1. Prepare draft action plan with critical milestones, funding forecast and timelines for

executions of SBIR and STTR projects (three phases) at GRC.

2. Review topics/subtopics submitted for completeness, accuracy, and relevancy.

3. Provide support for establishment of proposal reviews (includes coordination of

schedule, location, notice to participants, dissemination of proposal with assignments,

drafting agendas for meetings, and summary of outcomes) 

4. Provide administrative support for GRC report to be presented at NASA HQ meetings

5. Attend monthly telecoms and ViTS re: SBIR/STTR program

6. Provide weekly updates for Code XT staff meetings

7. Provide monthly narrative reports on SBIR/STTR project progress and infusion

successes

8. Assist in facilitating and identify opportunities for infusing SBIR technologies into GRC

programs and projects.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 55

Schedule 35

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Candidate must have the ability to Reviews manuals, technical guides, and other

documents and to develop operational plans to achieve objectives with-in prescribed

guidelines. Coordinates and directs the development of reports, correspondence, and

other documents to communicate SBIR related service policies and procedures.

Candidate has demonstrated competency in preparation of draft reports and other

presentations on program planning and project implementation. This task requires skill

in coordination across organizational units in the formative stages of program initiation

and project implementation to ensure effective communication of processes and

objectives. The ability to adjusts priorities to meet new requirements or unforeseen

situations is a critical asset.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/155.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Technical Representative: Bilardo, Vincent

Task Number: NNC06E155T - 11

Task Title: CLV- Project Management Scheduling Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 01/21/2009, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20081208 on 12/16/2008, kcm

This Task was formerly GESS Task 487.

No Bid form and email received on 12/6/2005, WISE Task No. 20051118 ljm

WISE TASK #20051118 11/26/2005 mbb

The Launch Systems Project Office (LSPO) is responsible providing deliverables for CLV

Upper Stage, J-2 Engine Testing at B2, ARES I-1 Technical Tasks with MSFC. Assigned

CLV Upper Stage Technical Tasks include work in Avionics, Vehicle Integration, Thrust

Vector Control, and Structures and Thermal. The CLV Program (MSFC is the responsible

NASA Center for the CLV Program) supports the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Support for project level scheduling that includes roll-up of CLV Upper Stage, J-2X

Testing and ARES-1-I schedules from project related, technical task oriented projects.

Also provide support for project level scheduling for GRC Upper Stage test efforts, the

Integrated P&HG project and the integrated GRC S&MA effort. The task involves top

level schedule and resource loaded planning and development which coordinates

milestones and objectives through communication and interaction with Project

Management and technical leads. The task will involve deriving on overall scheduling

plan, regular communication and technical interchanges with Project managers, technical

leads, and development/maintenance of schedules within this system to accurately track

project progress. Technical writing and editing for P&HG in addition to content

development and publication on the “This Month in Space Exploration” website, is also

included.

Support for LSPO which includes budget resources tracking, including Purchase Request

tracking, labor reports and tracking, and full cost analysis and tracking.

Support the CLV ARES-1-I element in the areas of Integration and Systems Engineering.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/155.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Government's estimated period of performance is April 1, 2009 to August 30, 2011.

The LSPO requires the support of experienced schedulers and budget analyst(s) with the

ability to develop and organize activity based (WBS product oriented) on the CLV

technical tasks GRC has with the MSFC. Expert proficiency in the following software

applications is required: Power Point, Excel, Microsoft Project, Access, and Word. The

task will also require an integrated project schedule to track major activities, milestones,

and resources for LSPO management and CLV Upper Stage, J-2X Engine Testing and

ARES-1-I Project Management.

The work will require the development of all programs/project schedules and the

tracking and identification of scheduling issues that cross project boundaries and will

require reporting of feedback on individual critical path scheduling items. For this task all

schedule inputs and changes, provided by CLV Project technical task managers, are to

be reviewed by the analyst for consistency and viability and reported on to LSPO

management. 

Task requires proficient schedule analyst capabilities at a high level. This requirement

should involve personnel with proficient oral and written communication skills for project

activity coordination. 

The LSPO requires support for CLV of budget resource tracking analysis. Proficiency and

knowledge of the NASA IEMP system is required, along with knowledge and efficiency in

Microsoft PowerPoint, Word & Excel. 

The CLV J-2X Engine Testing at B2 element requires support for Systems Engineering.

The Systems Engineer support shall consist of (but not limited to) assisting in the

development of Integrated, resource loaded, project schedule.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include:

Detailed integrated, resource loaded schedules for the CLV technical tasks.

Monthly updates of above for individual technical task managers and the CLV Project

Office.

Track and report on an integrated set of milestones/deliverables.

Analyze individual technical task schedules for GRC resource conflicts.

Attend related project planning meetings.

Provide scheduling reports as required.

Provide weekly and/or monthly financial status and reports, graphs, and analysis.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/155.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:19 AM]

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experienced Scheduler(s), Financial/Budget Analyst(s)

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/158.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Technical Representative: Kaustinen, Brad

Task Number: NNC06E158T - 10

Task Title: NCAS Contract Managment System

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/3/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 08/15/2008, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20080830 on 08/11/2008, kcm

THIS TASK IS NON-ENGINEERING/NON-RESEARCH WORK. REVIEW IS NOT

REQUIRED. T.BURKE 1/17/07

This Task was formerly GESS Task 494.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The NCAS Contract Management System is used by Center Technical Liasons across the Agency

to enter and modify task orders for Safety and Quality related engineering support to their Centers

and/or Programs. This task will provide the on-going operation and maintenance of the Contract

Management System (CMS) and it's Funding Application (FA) including the configuration

management of the CMS and FA.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011.

Completion of GESS-2 Contract. Base plus 3 Options ****** 

The contractor shall manage the following Software Plans: the Software Management Plan,

Configuration Management Plan, and IT Security Plan for the CMS.Customer service will be

provided to customers accessing this CMS. Maintain the online manuals for users so that self help

can be obtained on the site. Maintain the report requirements as defined by the NCAS customer

base. The Contractor shall provide any necessary programming changes to accommodate the

NCAS team customer requirements. Provide "help desk" services for Government and Contractor

customers. 

The contractor shall maintain the FA as required by the NCAS CO and COTR. Customer service

and documentation will be provided to customers accessing this system.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/158.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Support the NCAS COTR's request for ad hoc reports required to prepare for the Award Fee

meeting in June.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Provide troubleshooting and estimates for any modifications identified/requested during this

award fee period.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 25

Schedule 50

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

N/A

Government Furnished Property

Amicus server for production, amicus1 and grgessdev servers for testing

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Technical Representative: Pachlhofer, Peter

Task Number: NNC06E162T - 13

Task Title: Single Spool Turbine Facility

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 500.

In 1999, an effort began for design and construction of a Dual Spool Turbine Facility

(DSTF) in the W-2 Test Cell in ERB. This effort, part of the Ultra Efficient Engine

Technology (UEET) program, was to develop and demonstrate technologies required for

lightweight, reduced-stage turbine cores, high pressure (HP) and low pressure (LP)

turbine systems, and high-performance, high-efficiency and environmentally compatible

propulsion systems. A Preliminary Engineering Report was completed by General

Physics/Belcan and used as a basis to begin the actual facility design. The Facility

Design was completed by Aero Systems Engineering.

In late 2003, program changes within the Vehicle Systems Sector of which UEET is a

part, and the increased construction costs on the DSTF necessitated the cancellation of

the that program. However, further review of the research objectives with NASA and

industry partners revealed that a Single Spool Turbine Facility (SSTF) could achieve 50-

80% of the original objectives. A plan was developed to reactivate the mothballed W-6A

Warm Core Turbine Facility for this purpose. The Glenn Research Center (GRC)

Director’s Strategic Management Team (DSMT) approved this plan in March 2004.

The original SOW required that the Facility be operational for research in April 2007.

However, due to budget constraints, the engineering and design for this Single Spool

Turbine Facility was been put on hold January 2005. 

Funding for the SSTF effort was restored in February 2006, and it is anticipated that

after restart (March 2006), the Design effort will take approximately 18 months, followed

by a 1-year construction effort, and then a facility checkout using a a bladeless rotor of

comparable size and mass to the actual test article.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide Engineering and Design services to complete the design of the installation of the

Single Spool Turbine Facility into Cell W-6 of the Engine Research Building. This work

will be comprised of all aspects except for the Electrical Engineering and Controls aspect

of the work.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

and specific tasks to be performed

Statement of Work

For the Single Spool Turbine Facility W-6A, Bldg 23

Prepared by Peter Pachlhofer

Research Test Division

July 2004

1. Introduction

In 1999, an effort began for design and construction of a Dual Spool Turbine Facility

(DSTF) in the W-2 Test Cell in ERB. This effort, part of the Ultra Efficient Engine

Technology (UEET) program, was to develop and demonstrate technologies required for

lightweight, reduced-stage turbine cores, high pressure (HP) and low pressure (LP)

turbine systems, and high-performance, high-efficiency and environmentally compatible

propulsion systems. A Preliminary Engineering Report was completed by General

Physics/Belcan and used as a basis to begin the actual facility design. The Facility

Design was completed by Aero Systems Engineering.

In late 2003, program changes within the Vehicle Systems Sector of which UEET is a

part, and the increased construction costs on the DSTF necessitated the cancellation of

the that program. However, further review of the research objectives with NASA and

industry partners revealed that a Single Spool Turbine Facility (SSTF) could achieve 50-

80% of the original objectives. A plan was developed to reactivate the mothballed W-6A

Warm Core Turbine Facility for this purpose. The Glenn Research Center (GRC)

Director’s Strategic Management Team (DSMT) approved this plan in March 2004.

A Requirements Document for the SSTF, in Appendix A, has been developed and is the

basis for the following Statement of Work. The Statement of Work is for the Engineering,

Design, Drafting and Specifications necessary to begin construction of the SSTF. It is

anticipated that portions of the DSTF design can be used in the SSTF, in particular the

Power Absorption System and its related subsystems. 

The original SOW required that the Facility be operational for research in April 2007.

However, due to budget constraints, the engineering and design for this Single Spool

Turbine Facility was put on hold January 2005. 

Funding for the SSTF effort was restored in February 2006, and it is anticipated that

after restart (March 2006), the Design effort will take approximately 18 months, followed

by a 1-year construction effort, and then a facility checkout using a bladeless rotor of

comparable size and mass to the actual test article.

2. SCOPE OF REQUIRED SERVICES

2.1. Required Disciplines

The disciplines required for the final design services include architectural, civil/structural,

mechanical, aeronautical, and electrical engineering. Specialized technical services that

will be required include thermal, structural, and rotor dynamic and vibration

computational analysis. Extensive knowledge of rotating equipment design, gearing and

bearing design, and large motor/generator design and integration is also required.

2.2. Basis for Final Design

This Statement of Work (SOW), the SSTF Requirements Document, the Dual Spool
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Turbine Facility Design, and field investigation shall be used as the basis for the final

design. 

2.3. Units of Measure

The final design shall utilize the English Standard measurement system.

2.4. Summary of Deliverables

Furnished services shall result in detailed final design drawings, assembly drawings,

specifications for equipment purchases, specifications for component fabrication,

construction and assembly procedures, procurement and fabrication of hardware.

2.5. Required Services

Services required under this contract shall include the following: 

2.5.1. Review of existing DSTF and W-6 drawings and systems along with detailed field

visits and investigations as necessary to become familiar with and to verify and record

the existing conditions. Update drawings of existing fluid and electrical systems as

needed. These field investigations will allow the Contractor to prepare new drawings and

to determine the interfaces with the existing systems and potential interferences with

the work being designed. The Contractor shall prepare drawings detailing the interfaces

between the SSTF and existing systems.

2.5.2. The Glenn Facilities Division will retain overall responsibility for engineering related

to the High Voltage Electrical and the Glenn Variable Frequency System. The Research

Test Division will retain overall responsibility for engineering related to the Facility

controls. The contractor will work with the Research Test Division to specify and

integrate facility instrumentation. Design and drafting service are needed to support the

High Voltage Electrical and Facility controls.

2.5.3. Design development calculations.

2.5.4. Detailed analyses for validation of the proposed design. These analyses shall

include:

2.5.4.1. Piping flexibility analysis: Inlet Temperature range: 70-1000oF 

Exhaust Temperature range: 20-350oF

2.5.4.2. Rotordynamics analysis.

2.5.4.3. Driveline system Factor of Safety analysis.

2.5.5. Preparation of detailed final design drawings, diagrams, sub and total assembly

drawings, and technical specifications to meet requirements set forth herein. As

applicable, these shall include architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical plans,

sections, and details, piping & instrumentation diagrams (P&ID), power one-line

diagrams, etc. 

2.5.5.1. Where applicable, existing drawings shall be updated with the most current

information on that system.

2.5.6. Design validation coordination and reviews with the NASA project team and

material vendors and fabricators during the design phase.

2.5.7. Coordination between disciplines for well-integrated construction drawings and

specifications.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

2.5.8. Development of and modifications to facility assembly procedures.

2.5.9. Updating of the existing W-6A Warm Core Turbine Hazard Analysis.

2.5.10. Assistance in the preparation of construction specifications.

2.5.11. Input into modifications to the Facility Operating Procedures.

2.5.12. Procurement and fabrication of hardware.

2.5.13. Support during construction on RFIs.

2.5.14. Support for Safety Reviews (Process Systems, Area 2).

2.5.15. Support for the Integrated Systems Review.

2.5.16. Support during the Facility Checkout Tests

2.5.17. Complete As-built drawings.

3. PROGRAMMATIC REQUIREMENTS

3.1. Required Meetings and Conferences

The following are the project requirements for meetings and conferences:

3.1.1. Design meetings between the Contractor and NASA shall be held two times per

month for the duration of the Task. The purpose of these meetings will be to address

current issues or concerns and to compare the current design status against scheduled

milestones. The Contractor may request the cancellation of a meeting if there are no

current issues. The Contractor shall generate formal meeting minutes for each meeting

and e-mail them to the NASA Technical Representative

3.1.2 Other meetings and telephone communications between the Contractor and the

NASA Project Team may take place if required to assure complete communications and

agreement of ideas to achieve the final objective.

4. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

The SSTF Requirements Document is the basis of the Technical Requirements and is

attached in Appendix A.

In particular, it is anticipated that portions of the Specifications and drawings from the

DSTF High Voltage System, Motor, Gearbox, and their related lubrication systems shall

be used as the basis for the SSTF design with minor modifications.

5. DELIVERABLES

5.1. Hand Calculations and Description of Design Approach

The Contractor shall provide a bound and organized set of all calculations (i.e. rough

pipe or equipment sizing, flow analyses including losses and valve Cv calculations,

containment calculations, structural calculations, etc.) along with a description of the

design approach. This shall also include the Driveline system Factor of Safety analysis.

The driveline, including all flexible couplings, torquemeter, shafts, and gearbox, must be

designed with a Factor of Safety that is adequate to ensure that the synchronous

machine remains mechanically connected to the turbine shaft in order to avoid

catastrophic turbine overspeed. The use of redundant couplings will be required in the

design. The calculations shall be organized according to the various subsystems.

5.2. Analysis Reports

The Contractor shall provide a brief report for all computer analyses required for the final

design. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

The report for each analysis shall clearly describe the formats for all input and output

files such that they are easily understandable by persons not familiar with the specific

software packages or the intricacies of the analysis. In addition, input and output file

data shall be organized in easily understandable tables. 

As a minimum, the Contractor shall provide reports for the following analyses;

5.2.1. Piping Flexibility Analysis Report

5.2.1.1. The report shall include a brief introduction (1-2 paragraphs) describing the

piping system that was analyzed, the analysis conditions (pressure, flow, fluid

temperature, external conditions, etc.), the types of analyses performed (i.e. pressure,

pressure + weight, pressure + weight + temperature, etc.), and the piping allowables

used for compliance (in accordance with ANSI B31.3).

5.2.1.2. The input file and an isometric diagram of the piping system being analyzed

shall be included in the report. Software-generated isometric diagrams are acceptable if

they can be easily understood by persons not familiar with the software package.

5.2.1.3. The report shall include a brief (1-2 paragraph) conclusion that indicates the

modifications required to the piping system to attain ANSI B31.3 code compliance (i.e.

anchor and guide locations, the addition of expansion joints, support locations changes,

etc.). The report shall also indicate areas of high stress and a summary of forces and

moments on equipment flanges (Inlet and Exhaust Manifold flanges, etc.). The output

shall indicate maximum loads at the tie-in points to all GRC Central Systems.

5.2.1.4. The output file and an isometric diagram of the piping system, including

supports, anchors, and expansion joints, shall be included in the report. Softwaregenerated isometric diagrams are acceptable if they can be easily understood by persons

not familiar with the software package.

5.2.1.5. The report shall include an appendix that contains the computer-generated run

data.

5.2.2. Rotordynamics Report

5.2.2.1. The Contractor shall perform a critical speed analysis on all custom-designed

shafts. For these designs the bent shaft frequency for all custom-designed shafts shall

not be lower than 125% of the maximum operating rotational speed, calculated with

rigid bearings: since these are rolling element bearings and do not have squeeze-film

dampeners. The critical speed analysis for each shaft shall be performed assuming the

most robust turbine requirements projected for the facility. Rigid shaft frequencies shall

allow a 15% speed margin with any steady state operating speed.

5.2.2.2. A separate critical speed analysis shall be performed for each IST and research

test article currently available.

5.2.2.3. A torsional analysis shall include the complete drive train shafting and shall be

performed for each IST and research test article.

5.2.2.4. Analyze the effect of gearbox shafting sets on the torsional frequency.

5.2.2.5. Review all test articles for mechanical integrity, including rotor burst analysis,

single blade out containment and over-speed analysis.

5.2.2.6. The analysis report shall include a brief description of the shaft system

(including the size and weight of the shaft, the bearing locations, the couplings used,

etc.). In addition, the report shall include all assumptions used for the analysis including

material properties, bearing limits, bearing spring rates, turbine size and weight, and the

bearing overhung distance.

5.2.2.7. The analysis report shall include a brief description of the methodology used to

determine the shaft critical speeds including a discussion of the assumed inertial

properties of the turbine test article and the boundary conditions applied to the shaft(s).

5.2.2.8. The report shall include an output file showing the mode shapes, lateral and

torsional frequencies, critical speed maps, and unbalance response plots resulting from

the critical speed analysis.

5.2.2.9. The report shall include an appendix that contains the computer-generated run

data.

5.2.3. Facility Hazards Report
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

The Contractor shall update the existing hazards analysis for the new facility. The

analysis shall be performed in accordance with the guidelines given in the “Safety Permit

Requestors Guide” and the ISO9000 document GRC-P7030.010 “Hazard Analysis

Development”. 

5.2.4. Pressure Systems Office (PSO) Report

The Contractor shall provide all necessary documentation and support to comply with

engineering requirements and all Glenn PSO requirements for process systems

recertification.

Support shall include (but not limited to) any necessary inspections, design, analysis,

FEA, hydrotests, hardware fabrication and procurement. 

Targeted areas for recertification include:

W6B: (Design a new 12" carbon steel exhaust line for the 15x15 Supersonic Wind Tunnel

to replace the existing line left over from the Hot Cascade Rig. The new line should tap

into the exhaust system just upstream of valve EL357 instead of the existing entry at the

spray cooler. The design should include new valves to replace the 3 existing valves

AC040, AC041, and AC042. No relief valves are currently required, however, blanked off

flange provisions should be included if they are needed in the future.)

5.3. Drawings

5.3.1. General Drawing Format Requirements

5.3.1.1. All drawings shall be made using the latest GRC available AutoCAD Release and

conform to the existing GRC Drafting Standard for Facilities Drawings.

5.3.1.2. The Contractor shall provide a cover sheet for the project (to be given the first

drawing number in the overall drawing set). The cover sheet shall indicate the project

title and fiscal year, the project location (shown on a scaled plot plan with the work area

circled), and a listing of drawings included in the project. The drawings following the

cover sheet shall be organized according to work discipline in the following order:

Architectural, Structural, Mechanical, and Electrical. For each discipline, demolition work

shall be shown first, followed by drawings depicting “new” work. 

5.3.1.3. All units of measurement shown on drawings shall be in English Standard units.

5.3.1.4. All drawings shall be cross-referenced between disciplines and to the cover

sheet.

5.3.1.5. Demolition and new construction shall not be shown on the same drawing

unless approved by the TR. Disciplines shall not be mixed on a drawing unless approved

by the TR.

5.3.1.6. All original drawings shall become the property of the Government and shall be

delivered to the TR upon completion of work by the Contractor.

5.3.1.7. Where applicable, existing drawings shall be updated with the most current

information on that system.

5.3.2. Architectural/Civil/Structural Drawing Requirements

The following is a minimum list of architectural/civil/structural drawings required for this

project:

5.3.2.1. Plans and sections of Cell W-6 showing the entire cell and complete SSTF layout

and the background arrangement of all Primary Air, Exhaust, and Cooling Air piping.

Drawing notes shall include all structural design load values.

5.3.2.2. Plans, sections, and details for all equipment foundations and equipment

support structures, both inside and outside Cell W-6, in the Basement, or on the roof. 

5.3.2.3. Plans, sections, and details for all specially designed supports and anchors for

piping and equipment. Details shall include all attachment requirements to existing

structures.

5.3.2.4. Sections and details for architectural changes including masonry wall

modifications (if required), building penetrations to accommodate major piping

components, and roof penetrations for ducting.

5.3.2.5. Plans, sections, and details for equipment rigging options (including installation
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

of structural steel below existing floor slabs if required).

5.3.2.6. Painting/finish schedules and details shall be shown on the drawings as

required.

5.3.3. Mechanical Drawing Requirements

5.3.3.1. All mechanical piping drawing notes shall indicate the piping design criteria, the

piping materials, and the pressure testing requirements for all piping systems shown on

the drawing.

5.3.3.2. Where possible, mechanical Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) shall

show fluid flow from left to right. P&IDs shall be formatted accordingly to match the

existing test cell drawings. Settings for alarms, shutdown settings, and PLC I/O channel

assignments shall be shown on all system P&IDs.

5.3.3.3. Detailed component sheets (CP Sheets) shall accompany each P&ID drawing. CP

sheets shall be 8-1/2 x 11 tables that provide information on each component identified

on the P&ID. 

5.3.3.4. The following is a list of new or updates to existing mechanical drawings

required for the project:

5.3.3.4.1. P&IDs for all process systems including the Combustion Air Subsystem

(Primary Air, Cooling Air Circuits, etc.), Exhaust Subsystem, cooling water systems, lube

oil systems (for gearbox, synchronous machine), hydraulic system for valve actuation,

and Natural Gas System for the Primary Air Heater.

5.3.3.4.2. Piping plans, sections, and details. The drawing notes shall include information

on the maximum allowable working pressure, the fluid operating temperature, the fluid

flow rate range, and all information necessary to perform a hydrostatic pressure test of

the piping system.

5.3.3.4.3. Assembly and detail drawings for all non-commercial hardware. Assembly and

detail drawings shall include information such as construction/fabrication specifications,

material selections, minimum fastener requirements and torque requirements, surface

finishes, testing requirements, and all commercial hardware used for the fabrication.

5.3.3.4.4. Assembly and detail drawings (as required) for all commercial systems used

such as motors, gearboxes, and lubrications systems. These drawings may be vendor

drawings if they contain the necessary assembly/installation information.

5.3.3.4.5. Drawings for assembly and installation of all commercial and non-commercial

hardware. These drawings shall include alignment procedures for installations performed

at room temperature, including any offsets to maintain centerline control at steady state

operating conditions. 

5.3.3.4.6. Drawings for rotating IST checkout and research test articles requires

procedures for assembly and instrumentation routing.

5.3.4. Electrical Drawing Requirements

The following is a minimum list of electrical drawings required for the project:

5.3.4.1. Plan - Control Drawings.

5.3.4.2. Plan - Instrumentation Drawing.

5.3.4.3. Plan - Power Conduit Routing.

5.3.4.4. Control flow chart.

5.3.4.5. Valve actuator/positioner controls elementary and control diagrams.

5.3.4.6. Valve installation and connection diagrams.

5.3.4.7. Instrumentation elementary and interconnection diagrams.

5.3.4.8. PLC I/O drop cabinet and layout drawings. Digital and Analog wiring shall be

separated.

5.3.4.9. 7200 Volt Switchgear installation detail.

5.3.4.10. 7200 Volt Switchgear cabling and interconnection diagrams.

5.3.4.11. Facility one-line diagram.

5.3.4.12. Terminal strip cabinet connection diagrams.

5.3.4.13. Excitation system installation detail.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

5.3.4.14. Protective relay installation and connection diagrams.

5.3.4.15. Lube oil pump installation for each system.

5.3.4.16. Lube control elementary and interconnect for each system.

5.3.4.17. Ventilation system power.

5.3.4.18. Ventilation control, interlocks and interconnection.

5.3.4.19. Safety Shutdown, Emergency Stop and Alarm hardwire control diagrams.

5.4. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS

5.4.1. General Construction Specification Information

5.4.1.1. The Contractor shall assist in the preparation of construction specifications. 

Appendix

Single Spool Turbine Facility

Requirements Document

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

As stated in SOW, including:

Rotating checkout hardware (for balancing purposes) - December 2009

Flow test checkout hardware – July 2010 

Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The disciplines required for the final design services include architectural, civil/structural,

mechanical, aeronautical, and electrical engineering. Specialized technical services that

will be required include thermal, structural, and rotor dynamic and vibration

computational analysis. Extensive knowledge of rotating equipment design, gearing and

bearing design, and large motor/generator design and integration is also required.

Government Furnished Property

Drawing Files/reports from the Dual Spool Turbine Facility and W-6 Test Facility.

Pro-Engineer

AutoCad

Caesar

Dyrobes - Critical Speed Analysis Program

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/162.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/165.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Technical Representative: Krivanek, Thomas

Task Number: NNC06E165T - 14

Task Title: Independent Validation and Verification of CLV Structural and Sizing

Analysis

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 503.

This task is in support of the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, Constellation

Project CLV IV&V to assure all vehicle requirements are met and the design fulfills all

mission objectives.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task is to perform the engineering analysis for the structural sizing and optimization

of the Ares V EDS and Payload Shroud for a Constellation Exploration mission.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall perform an integrated vehicle analysis with primary focus on the

structural systems including an independent analysis of all load conditions for the

optimized trajectory specified for a Lunar Exploration mission. Vehicle loading will be

provided based on a trajectory analysis optimized by the OTIS program and will account

for the aero, acceleration, acoustic, ground wind, vibration, thermal, maximum Q-alpha,

POGO, abort, and recovery loading. The SIZER program shall be used to verify initial

sizing and perform trade studies to optimize the vehicle configuration including structural

and tank properties with select verification of systems. Concept of operations has been

identified as a mission to transport a crew to a staging orbit for an Exploration mission.

Events shall include ground operations, vehicle launch, staging, rendezvous and docking.

Systems to be included are the first stage, EDS, Payload and all interface hardware and

support systems including the main propulsion, RCS, fluid acquisition and delivery

system, thermal control system, GN&C and safing systems, and power and avionics.

Facilities required for support of the above systems shall also be considered. Vehicle

sizing analysis shall be presented at each DAC and as applicable at the SRR and TIM’s

as required. This design and analysis shall be conducted to meet the mission

requirements inclusive of trades in tank design, tank material, power requirements,

interstage support structures and propulsive requirements. 

The contractor shall also provide design support of Ares V payload shroud structure and

subsystems including modeling and composite concept analysis.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/165.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:20 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The schedule for all TM documentation activities to be completed is 12/30/10. 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Engineering personnel qualified in the use of the SIZER program and in advanced

structural design and modeling is required.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/167.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Technical Representative: Wernet, Mark

Task Number: NNC06E167T - 19

Task Title: Planar Optical Diagnostics for Flow Field Measurements

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/6/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Addition of procurement item. No new engineering or research effort. Excluded from review. T.

Burke 4/4/07

No-Bid by DE received on 09/19/2006, ljm

No-Bid by RPC received on 09/18/2006, ldk

No-Bid by DR received on 09/14/2006, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20060913 on 09/13/2006, ldk

The NASA Glenn Research conducts research in advanced propulsion systems to develop

revolutionary new propulsion concepts and also to improve the efficiency and performance of

more traditional propulsion systems under the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate. In

addition, NASA Glenn supports testing of entry vehicles for inter-planetary science missions

under the Science Mission Directorate. Nonintrusive measurements of flow field velocities within

and around these advanced propulsion systems and/or re-entry vehicles are required in order to

gain insight into the fundamental flow physics and also for validation of Computational Fluid

Dynamics (CFD) models of the flow field. Nonintrusive techniques are preferable over intrusive

probes which may disturb the flow and also may not survive the harsh environments encountered

in these advanced propulsion systems. Test facilities supported include aeroacoustic research

facilities, turbomachinery facilities, Propulsion Systems Lab and the 8x6, 9x15 and 10x10

research wind tunnels at GRC. Within the genre of nonintrusive velocimetry techniques, planar

techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Doppler Global Velocimetry (DGV) are

more desirable than traditional point based techniques such as Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV).

PIV and DGV provide instantaneous planar measurements of the flow velocity that can be used to

compute first and second order flow statistics for validation of CFD predictions and verification

of prototype propulsion system performance.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Develop minimally intrusive, laser-based velocity measurement systems for application to

turbomachinery, Pulse Detonation Engine systems, and aeroacoustic ground based propulsion

research. These optical diagnostics systems may also be applied in subsonic and supersonic wind
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/167.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

tunnel facilities. For the aeroacoustics research efforts flow fields of interest shall at a minimum

include subsonic to supersonic flows at temperatures up to 1000C. Multi-planar, high repetition

rate velocity data are required. Specific development tasks include working with and/or

developing fiber optic light delivery and imaging, high temperature flow seeding, molecular flow

seeding, data acquisition and processing, high rep-rate laser development, and high frame-rate

imaging. Work requires substantial initiative and problem solving abilities; broad objectives will

be given but specific implementation methods are to be determined by the contract engineer.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW Summary Should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific task to be performed

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011.

(Completion of GESS-2 Contract. Base plus 3 Options)******

Specific Work Elements:

1. Study the flow measurement requirements of present and future GRC aeronautic and space

exploration programs. Provide reports summarizing determinations when appropriate.

2. Develop, evaluate and implement diagnostic methods based on Particle Imaging Velocimetry,

Doppler Global Velocimetry, Filtered Rayleigh Scattering and other flow imaging techniques,

with emphasis on planar measurement methods for application to both in-house and customer

research rigs and components. Provide recommendation for measurement system application.

3. Consult with researchers on new diagnostic techniques and systems, which could be

incorporated into nonintrusive instrumentation systems. Stay abreast of current measurement

technologies and improvements in laser and detector technology with regard to their application

and enhancement of nonintrusive measurement systems development.

4. Develop software required for improved data acquisition, processing and display of research

data. Process acquired research data and provide researchers with flow measurement velocity data

in physical units. Develop techniques for integration of flow measurement data with CFD

predictions.

5. Determine requirements for implementation of complimentary nonintrusive optical diagnostic

techniques for measuring velocity and temperature, preferably molecular based techniques.

6. Write reports and present conference papers.

7. Assist in the preparation of research proposals to support continuation of optical diagnostics

technology development and application.

8. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance of technical and/or technology transfer

meetings, presentation of research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful for

enhancing capabilities in performing the task. Travel may also be required for support of research

tests at other NASA Centers or customer facilities.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/167.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Specific Deliverables:

1. Monthly progress reports shall include:

A. Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of

all task specific projects.

B. Technical achievements or issues.

2. Software/hardware, testing equipment/materials, and optics shall be procurred as needed to

meet task requirements.

Performance based on task reviews will be conducted bi-annually for the purpose of evaluating

task performance according to predetermined measurables. Revisions, if required, to above

performance based deliverables will be tracked via monthly reports and modifications will be

jointly agreed upon by the Supervisor and the TR as they relate to the performance rating of this

task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 20

Schedule 50

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Ph.D in mechanical or electrical engineering or a related discipline and at least 5 years of laser

and optical diagnostic research experience in lab scale or preferable large scale facilities. Specific

experience with both Particle Imaging Velocimetry and Doppler Global Velocimetry techniques

and data processing is highly desirable. Experience with molecular flow tagging and planar laser

induced fluorescence (PLIF) and laser diode absorption spectroscopy is beneficial. Familiarity

with fiber optics and fiber bundle imaging is also desirable. Experience with surface measurement

probes and knowledge of instrumentation electronics is desirable. Programming experience in C,

C++ and Fortran are required and proof of competency must be presented. Familiarity with

digital image file formats is required. Experience with high energy pulsed laser systems is

desirable. Experience with digital image processing techniques is also desirable. The ability to

work effectively in multidisciplinary teams and/or independently is required. Good time

management skills, oral and written communication skills are required.

Limited administrative support is required to support this task.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/167.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/178.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Technical Representative: Envia, Edmane

Task Number: NNC06E178T - 8

Task Title: Aerodynamic Test Research

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/18/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 518.

No Bid form and email received 06/23/2006, ljm.

Entered as WISE Task 20060613, ldk. 

Task to start July 1, 2006 

Fan/nacelle models are tested in wind tunnel to determine their acoustic, aerodynamic, and

aeroelastic performance. Data obtained from such tests are used to validate fan noise reduction

concepts and flow and noise prediction codes. These tests are also sometimes used to demonstrate

the feasibility of advanced flow and noise diagnostic techniques when applied to propulsion

systems.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Serve as the aerodynamic research test engineer in support of aeroacoustic wind tunnel tests of

scale model fans and open rotors.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

*** Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011 ***

The contractor shall:

1. Support development of test plans for, and execution of, wind tunnel aeroacoustic tests of

fan/nacelle/open rotor models including hardware design, instrumentation selection, data

reduction requirements, and data acquisition & analysis.

2. Shall develop comparisons of wind tunnel aerodynamic measurements with previous test

results, design intent, and/or analytical computations.

3. Shall document the the results in NASA reports, conference and/or journal papers.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/178.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

********** NEW AS OF AFP7 - AUGUST 13, 2009 *********

1. Document aerodynamic results from a recently completed test of advanced fan noise reduction

concepts in the ultra high bypass ratio ADP fan.

(12/31/2009)

2. Support development and execution of a wind tunnel test plan for assessing the aeroacoustic

performance of open rotors.

(12/31/2009)

3. Support development of wind tunnel test plans for evaluating advanced fan noise reduction

concepts including the second generation soft vane and over-the-rotor technologies.

(6/30/2010)

***********************************************

(As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.)

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Personnel Profile

Masters in Mechanical Engineering with extensive knowledge and experience in the following

areas are required: fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, wind tunnel testing technology including;

advanced instrumentation and diagnostic test techniques such as dynamic and static force balance

measurement techniques including data acquisition, reduction and analysis software development;

rotating machinery performance measurements techniques for pressure and temperature including

data acquisition, reduction and analysis software development; expert knowledge in wind tunnel

propulsion related scale model design and fabrication; expert knowledge in propulsion simulation

technology and operation; expert knowledge in online, real-time data acquisition and analysis

systems and operation including software development; ability to lead large team of test

engineers during wind tunnel testing projects, including planning schedules, developing test plans,

and conducting testing.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/178.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/179.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Technical Representative: Grantier, Julie

Task Number: NNC06E179T - 12

Task Title: CEV Vehicle Integration Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This Task was formerly GESS Task 519.

Background

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

***No updates to the Task Order Description. 

The Vehicle Integration Team requires Systems Engineering with background in spacecraft

power, propulsion, structures, flight dynamics, and vehicle operations. This task includes to

items:

Orion to Program Requirements Definition

1) Execution of integration activities with the Cx Program required to develop the Orion design

and integration requirements for the project (Cx CR activity, major reviews, etc...)

2) Orion IRD Manager - responsible for providing the Orion IRD Book Developers direction to

ensure IRDs are on schedule and leveled across the project

3) Orion IRD Book Development - responsible for providing the Orion technical input to the Cx

program for generation of the Orion IRDs including traceability to the CARD and Orion SRD

Orion Verification Requirements Convergence/Development

1) Lead the effort to work verification requirements issues between Constellation (CxP), Orion,

ISS, and other CxP Projects and Lockheed Martin; Current NASA verification requirements set

contained within Orion and Constellation documentation --- such as Orion SRD, CxP Human

Systems Interface Requirements Document, Orion-to-Ares I IRD, Orion-to-Altair IRD, Orion-toCommunications and Tracking Network IRD, Orion-to-EVA IRD, Orion-to-Mission Systems

IRD, Orion-to-Ground Systems IRD, Orion-to-Portable Equipment, Payloads, and Cargo (PEPC)

IRD, Orion-to-ISS IRD, and other applicable CxP/Orion requirements documentation.

2) Lead the effort to work Joint Verification requirements with CxP and Orion/Lockheed Martin

for the External IRDs and the CxP Architecture Requirements Document.

3) Review and upgrade, as necessary, the Orion SRD requirements verifications appearing in

Section 4 of the SRD document. Perform an analysis of the CARD and the LM Spacecraft

Specification verification requirements for traceability to the program level requirements. This

will establish consistent relationships between VRs in those documents to VRs in the Orion SRD. 

Requirements Baseline Management
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/179.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

1) The objective is to perform the necessary tasks to realize a system and method for tracking and

reporting technical differences within the various project requirement baselines. This analysis

shows the differences in the NASA requirements baseline and the Orion requirements baseline. It

also provides the data to show compliance between the current architecture and the baseline

requirements. 

Support for Prime Contractor Oversight

1) Interfacing with LM to ensure proper implementation of the Orion requirements and generation

of the needed specifications and ICD documentation from the contractor.

2) Verification of the allocation and traceability of the Orion requirements to LM specifications

thru participation in the LM system, sub-system and IRD specification development. Working

with the contractor, project requirement owners, project T&V and program requirement owners to

resolve discrepancies in flowdown of the verification requirements. 

3) Participation in the LM/NASA Requirements Interface Working Group to facilitate proper

identification, allocation, flow-down and management of the requirements and internal/external

interfaces for the Orion spacecraft, modules, sub-systems and components.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW

See task order description above

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Specific milestones and deliverables include the following.

1. Orion to Program Requirements Definition: October - September DAC4/5 support.

2. Orion Verification Requirements Management: October - September DAC4/5 support.

Orion CDR support - Joint & Other VR discrepancies burn down (Deliverable)

3. Requirements Baseline Management

October - September Orion CDR support - Requirements compliance matrices (Deliverable)

4. Support for Prime Contractor Oversight 

October 2009 Firm Negotiations with Prime - SRD VR discrepancies (Deliverable) 

Other VR discrepancies burn down (Deliverable)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 33

Schedule 33

Cost 34
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/179.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:21 AM]

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Knowledge of NASA systems engineering processes and procedures.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/180.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

Technical Representative: Cressman, Thomas

Task Number: NNC06E180T - 11

Task Title: Service Module Structures

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

GRC has been given responsibility for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Service Module

(SM) and Spacecraft Adaptor (SA). As part of this, GRC will be developing requirements,

performing design cycles for government reverence configurations, performing insight/oversight

of the contractors developing SM/SA vehicle and subsystems, and performing Independent

Verification and Validation (IV&V) of contractor efforts.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide structural engineering services in support of design cycles for the government reference

vehicle. Provide engineering consulting in support of reviews and technical interchange meetings

with government and contactors. Support IV&V activities of contactor efforts.

Some data will be considered NASA Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) and must be handled

accordingly.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall:

-Provide consulting on vehicle design and construction.

-Perform sizing and structural optimization for minimum mass for primary and secondary

structural elements, to support trade studies and IV&V for Sevice Module and Spacecraft

Adaptor.

-Perform structural analyses of the solar arrays.

The Government Shall provide:

-Vehicle loads.

-Vehicle configuration.

-Access to Hypersizer.

The Contractor shall track the engineering support for the solar arrays as a seperate sub-task.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/180.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

Support Orion DAC4 POD ERB by 10/15/09

Support Orion DAC4 Closeout ERB by 4/15/10

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Seasoned engineers who have experience with vehicle and structural sizing and who are

experienced users of Hypersizer and MSC/NASTRAN.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/186.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

Technical Representative: Doehne, Thomas

Task Number: NNC07E186T - 11

Task Title: Ares I-1 Upper Stage Simulator (USS) GESS-2 Task

Task Details

Period of Performance

6/26/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 08/18/2008, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20080847 on 08/14/2008, kcm

No-Bid by DE received on 10/24/2006, ldk

No-Bid by R received on 10/18/2006, ldk

No-Bid by DR received on 10/16/2006, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20061015 on 10/16/2006, ljm

The Ares I vehicle is the new crew launch vehicle that will replace the shuttle in support of the

Exploration Vision. The first test flight of the new vehicle is Ares I-1. Glenn Research Center

(GRC) has the responsibility to build the Upper Stage Simulator (USS) for this first flight. For

this flight only, the USS consists of the Interstage, Upper Stage, Spacecraft Adapter and Service

Module. The USS is an element of the Flight Test Vehicle (FTV)and the other elements are the

First Stage, Crew Module/Launch Abort System, Roll Control System, and Avionics. Ares I-1

SE&I at Langley Research Center (LaRC) performs the FTV integration. The FTV Team and the

Kennedy Spaceflight Center (KSC) Ground Systems (GS) Team makeup the Ares I-1 Flight Test

Team.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task requests a continuation for System Engineering and Integration support for Ares I-1

USS Element team at GRC.

Most of this task is NOT NEW WORK- in order to help track costs using EVM the task is being

broken off an existing task.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The period of performance is from October 1, 2009-October 31, 2009.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/186.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

Systems Engineering and Integration (SE&I) support 

The SE&I support staff shall

Modified o Provide oversight for review and comment input to Ares I-X FTV change requests

and integration documents.

o Travel to technical interchange meetings or to KSC as needed to support reviews and hardware

processing.

o Assist in planning and development of any documentation for the Flight Test Readiness Review

(FTRR) which includes the Certificate of Flight Readiness (CoFR).

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Provide weekly coordination for distributing, reviewing, and responding to the change requests

distributed by the Ares I-X XCB.

2. Provide inputs for documentation to support Flight Test Readiness Review (FTRR) and the

Certificate of Flight Readiness (CoFR) to support a October 17th 2009 launch.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, The GESS-2 Team shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any

mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experience with Microsoft Powerpoint

Experience in decomposing requirements and identifying interfaces

Experience in integration of space flight hardware

Experience in the verification process

Government Furnished Property

None.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

Technical Representative: Omalley, Terence

Task Number: NNC07E189T - 16

Task Title: Extra Vehicular Activity (EVA) Engineering and Technical Services

Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Glenn Research Center is leading the development of the Power, Communications,

Avionics, and Informatics (PCAI) subsystem for the Constellation EVA project that is

managed by JSC. The EVA systems encompass suits and vehicle interface hardware

systems that are to be used for launch, re-entry, and contingency EVA (Configuration

1), as well as lunar surface operations (Configuration 2).

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Subtask 1: Technical Writing 

The contractor shall provide technical writing services to produce engineering

documentation ** and presentations ** for the EVA PCAI subsystem team, as well as the

Constellation (Cx) EVA Project overall. The contractor shall collect input from multiple

engineering sources within the EVA team. The Contractor shall provide technical writing

services to EVA Project personnel at both JSC and GRC **according to NASA

standards**, apply configuration management to documents **and presentations**

developed by the EVA Project team, and document and maintain PCAI team meeting

agendas, minutes and actions. 

Subtask 2: Power Engineering

The contractor shall provide the Lead Power Engineer for the Constellation EVA Systems

Project. The contractor shall perform system and interface requirements definition,

decomposition and validation, perform trade studies to support the requirements

definition process, develop Power System Specification(s), develop a conceptual and a

preliminary design of EVA Power subsystem, and develop breadboards in order to

develop preliminary designs and validate feasibility of requirements. The contractor shall

interface with GRC and JSC EVA personnel at Level II, such as the Power Systems

Integration Group (SIG), Level III (EVA Project), as well as Level IV (EVA Suit Element

and EVA Vehicle Interface Element). The contractor shall provide the Power

representative to the Vehicle Interface Element Team. **The contractor shall

participating in program level reviews and respond to change requests that involve the

power systems. The contractor shall monitor the power systems being developed by the

CSSE Prime Contractor.**

Subtask 3: Radio Communications and Network Engineering:

The contractor shall provide Radio Communications and Network Engineering expertise.

The contractor shall interface with appropriate Constellation Program communications

and **networking discipline** groups, perform trade**s,** studies and simulations to
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

identify candidate architectures **and technologies**, identify and analyze appropriate

standards, and develop concepts, breadboards and prototypes for lunar surface EVA

Radio Networking needs. **The contractor shall develop software to provide the

necessary networking and link layer functionality as described by the current design of

the radio.**

Subtask 4: Software Engineering

The contractor shall provide SW engineering support to the GRC EVA project. The

contractor shall develop SW prototypes and breadboards to evaluate the various

functions and capabilities required for the PCAI suit system. The contractor shall

interface with GRC and JSC EVA team members, as well as members of the Cx program,

as necessary. **The contractor shall produce reports from the prototypes and

breadports.**

Subtask 5: Audio and Navigation Systems Testing and Analysis 

The contractor shall provide testing and analysis of developmental EVA audio and

navigation systems. **The contractor shall interface with appropriate system engineering

and design groups within and external to Constellation; these groups will help to

establish the future direction for the NASA lunar communication infrastructure. The

contractor shall support trade studies, simulation, and field testing to develop

breadboards and prototype systems.**

Subtask 6: PCAI Systems Engineering and Integration Support 

The contractor shall provide overall systems engineering support to the PCAI

**Subsystem** Manager, interfacing with the GRC and JSC EVA team, as necessary.

The contractor shall manage the Suit PCAI requirements **and the** definition process

**as established by Suit SE&I. The contractor shall create and update ** the detailed

Suit PCAI schedules as well as the DAC tracker. The contractor shall maintain and update

risks, as necessary, in Cx IRMA for the monthly PCAI risk reviews.** Additionally, the

contractor shall interface with the Pressure Garment Subsystem, the Life Support

Subsystem, the Ground Support Equipment Subsystem, and the Suit Element SE&I

personnel.

**Subtask 7: Power Quality Engineering Development

The contractor shall evalute and develop a testbed for power conversion and distribution

systems to determine their viability for incorporation into the lunar PCAI architecture.

The contractor shall interface with appropriate power systems groups within and external

to Constellation.**

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Subtask 1. Technical Writing 

The Government shall furnish technical specifications, standards templates, notes, and

summaries, and rough drafts to be integrated into official project documentation **and

presentations**. The contractor shall:

A. Provide technical writing services in order to accomplish the goals identified in the

deliverables. 

B. Attend weekly EVA Software and Avionics and PCAI meetings at GRC.

**C. Maintain configuration control over the PCAI documentation within Windchill.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

D. Setup, configure, and support adhoc telecons and webexs for the PCAI group.**

Subtask 2. Power Engineering

The government shall provide Cx Requirements Documents, EVA System Requirements

Document, Element Requirements Documents, and a draft CEV – EVA Integration

Requirements Document. 

The contractor shall:

A. Provide updates to the **Orion** to EVA Interface Requirements Document (IRD)

and the Ground Operations (GO) to EVA IRD, resolving relevant Power Subsystem TBDs

and TBRs. Additionally, the contractor shall **maintain and support the** umbilical

interfaces and requirements.

B. Provide insight and oversight of prime contractor **responsible for** Configuration 1

Power Subsystem Specification(s) and preliminary designs and drawings for both the Suit

Element and Vehicle Interface Element (VIE) for the Cx EVA Systems Project.

C. Provide conceptual designs and drawings of the Configuration 2 Suit Power subsystem

and the VIE Hardware Power subsystem (if different from the Configuration 1 VIE

Hardware).

D. Develop Breadboards: The contractor shall design and build a power subsystem

breadboard for the space suit and vehicle interface hardware system, including

prototypes of designs for proof-of-concept and eventual integration into an avionics

system test bed. The breadboard shall eventually address vehicle interfaces, grounding

and bonding, switching and isolation concepts, power conversion, etc. Eventually, the

prototype(s) should address mass, volume, thermal, EMI/EMC, radiation, etc.,

requirements for flight systems.

**E. Author and/or review a Power Equipment List (PEL) for the PCAI equipment. The

PEL will include a list of the PCAI equipment along with the power requirements needed

for that specific configuration or option.**

F. Attend relevant EVA VIE Team meetings and telecons and participate as a full team

member. A two - three day trip to NASA Johnson Space Center will be required

approximately once every 6 **months**.

G. Attend weekly EVA Level 3 Software and Avionics meetings at GRC, as well as Level 4

PCAI weekly team meetings and PCAI lunar architecture meetings.

Subtask 3: Radio Communications and Networking Engineering

RF communications and networking requirements will need to be incorporated into the

Constellation Space Suit Element (CSSE) Configuration 2 PCAI subsystem conceptual

design for lunar surface EVA. This area is not yet well defined for the CSSE. It will

depend on the Exploration lunar surface communications architecture; lunar surface

navigation architecture; operations concepts relevant to surface EVA; radio design;

scenarios; data flows; and RF interfaces.

Design considerations for the radio include operational requirements, air interface

definition, coding and modulation scheme, multiple access method, network

infrastructure, **data rates,** and navigation signals. The lunar surface path loss is

different from Earth, because of the electromagnetic properties of the Moon, so

modeling of surface-to-surface line-of-site radio links and over-the-horizon radio links

are needed.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

CSSE will have to determine which standards are applicable and analyze them for

requirements. Data flow analyses will help define data processing requirements. The

radio packaging, power requirements, thermal considerations, and interfaces will need to

be defined. Hardware versus software implementations need to be analyzed through

trade studies.

The contractor shall:

A. Participate in communications and **networking** architecture development to

provide and derive EVA requirements that address EVA integration into Constellation

architecture, data flows, RF interfaces, radio requirements, and packaging considerations

for the radio, the antenna, and astronaut radiometric tracking.

B. Perform trade studies and simulations to develop specifications for the procurement of

a first generation EVA Radio System prototype that can interface with the developing

Constellation communications and navigation infrastructure. 

C. Develop draft requirements and verifications for EVA RF communications and

decompose higher level requirements into detailed requirements, suitable for inclusion in

the Suit Element Requirements Document (ERD). 

D. Analyze standards for applicability. 

E. Attend weekly EVA Level 4 PCAI meetings and PCAI lunar architecture meetings at

GRC.

Subtask 4: Software Engineering

The contractor shall develop SW prototypes and breadboards to support the

development of an overall suit software architecture that includes meeting

interoperability requirements as defined in the Constellation Program C3I specifications.

Specifically, breadboards will be developed and evaluated for all the C3I required

functions allocated to EVA, such as Voice Over IP, Security, and Data Exchange

capabilities. Trade studies, architecture development, breadboarding, testing and

reporting are required. The contractor shall:

A. Develop and decompose suit element requirements related to software.

B. Develop a C3I breadboard, test the C3I breadboard, and evaluate its impacts on the

overall suit SW architecture (such as CPU utilization, memory utilization, etc.).

C. Develop use-case diagrams or other means of documenting software requirements

and resulting architectures.

D. **Report the results of the breadboarding and prototyping efforts. Present the result

at the appropriate venues, such as the Suit Control Board and the EVA Systems

Engineering Panel.**

Subtask 5: Audio and Navigation Systems Testing and Analysis

The government will provide developmental audio and navigation concepts and

prototype equipment. The contractor will develop the testing capability and perform the

testing of EVA developmental audio communication and navigation systems. The

contractor shall:

A. Perform EVA audio and navigation system test cell build-up. 

B. Develop and document specific audio system testing procedures based on standards
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

from ITU, ANSI, etc. for conducting tests on developmental EVA PCAI audio systems. 

C. Document audio and navigation test setups with diagrams, photographs and narrative

descriptions. 

D. Conduct system integration, testing and evaluation of developmental EVA audio and

navigation systems, and report results and collect data in support of post-test analysis

including detailed synopsis of testing procedures conducted (tabular form), descriptions

of in-situ observations made and anomalous conditions. 

E. Perform post-test analysis of EVA audio and navigation systems test data. Develop

and execute data reduction scripts and procedures including scripts and procedures for

creating graphical displays of data. 

F. Provide written documentation of data reduction procedures and narratives of

reasoning chains employed in deriving conclusions and recommendations. 

G. Development and testing of field test equipment and prototypes. May include travel to

JSC and field sites.

Subtask 6: PCAI Systems Engineering and Integration Support

The government will provide baselined and draft versions of Suit Element PCAI

requirements documentation. 

The contractor shall:

A. Provide systems engineering and integration support to the PCAI Suit Subsystem

Manager (SSM), representing PCAI within the Suit Element if the PCAI SSM is

unavailable.

B. Manage the requirements and definition process for all Suit PCAI requirements and

verifications, gathering inputs from the team, and maintaining the burn down of relevant

TBR and TBDs in the requirements documentation

C. Represent Suit PCAI at Suit SE&I working groups and control panels.

C. Develop detailed schedules of activities for the entire Suit PCAI team **with input

from the PCAI members. Detailed schedule shall be made available to PCAI team

members via Windchill.**

D. Attend weekly EVA Level 4 PCAI meetings at GRC.

** E. Manage and collect status and mitigation plans for risks in Cx IRMA.

Subtask 7: Power Quality Engineering Development

The contractor shall provide trade studies, design, assembly, testing and evaluation of

power conversion and distribution systems. 

A. Develop and write market surveys that determines vendors and viability of various

dc-dc converters for the power conversion and distribution system.

B. Design a dc-dc converter for subsequent evaluation.

C. Procure and obtain needed parts for the dc-dc converter for subsequent assembly.

D. Assemble the dc-dc converter test systems.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

E. Produce test procedures and execute those procedures to test the dc-dc converter

systems.

F. Produce functional test and evaluation reports of the dc-dc testbed systems, including

an analysis of radiation, environmental, and functional issues associated with the power

conversion and distribution systems.

G. Interface with appropriate power systems groups within and external to

Constellation.**

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

Subtask 1. Technical Writing and Administrative Support 

A. Technical writing and editing of project documentation and presentations, ongoing.

B. Meeting minutes as needed, ongoing.

C. Maintain document repositories for EVA PCAI team, and access EVA Project Team

documentation sites, such as the CSSS Server and Windchill, ongoing.

D. Coordinate and support meetings (e.g., rooms, Webex, telecom #), ongoing.

Subtask 2. Power Engineering

A. Disposition Power-related TBRs and TBDs in the EVA Suit Element and VIE Element

Requirements Documents (ERDs), by 3/31/2010.

B. PDAC-2 Power Concepts Estimates, and Architecture, by 4/30/2010 

C. Resolution of Power Issues, such as TBRs and TBDs, and content in external IRDs, by

6/1/10.

D. Provide Power Engineering evaluation of prime contractor developed preliminary

designs, such as specifications, design documentation, and drawings, for the Suit

Element, by 9/1/10.

Subtask 3. Radio Communications and Network Engineering 

A. OPNET Modeling, by 3/31/10.

B. Link/Mac algorithm build specifications by 8/31/2010.

C. Data supporting resolution statements for TBDs/TBRs of Radio Reqs in the EVA Suit

Element Requirements Document, ongoing.

Subtask 4: Software Engineering

A. C3I breadboard assembly incorporating Data Exchange and Security requirements by

12/31/2009.

B. C3I Data Exchange and Security breadboard evaluation and test report updated by

12/31/2009.

C. C3I breadboard assembly incorporating Command and Control & Information

requirements by 9/30/2010.

D. C3I Command and Control & Information breadboard evaluation and test report

updated by 9/30/2010.

Subtask 5: Audio and Navigation Systems Testing and Analysis

A. Develop objectives, goals, and test procedures for the audio breadboard tests by

1/31/2010.

B. Audio breadboard test, evaluate, and characterize by 3/31/2010.

C. Report the results from the breadboard tests by 6/30/2010.

D. Data supporting demonstration testbed field test and evaluation, by 12/31/2009.

E. Integrate procured sensors into Data Collection Testbed by 12/31/2009.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/189.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:22 AM]

F. Support the upgrade of the Data Collection Testbed by 8/31/2010.

Subtask 6: PCAI Systems Engineering Support

A. Weekly updates of the PCAI section of the Suit Element Schedule.

B. Monthly updates of the PCAI TBRs and TBDs in the Suit ERD.

C. PCAI requirements to Suit Panels, as scheduled.

D. Data collection and update in Cx IRMA for risks, ongoing.

Subtask 7: Power Quality Engineering Development

A. Dc-dc converter market survey report by 11/27/2009.

B. Design and develop a dc-dc converter testbed by 3/1/2010.

C. Develop test procedures and objective for dc-dc converter testbed by 3/31/2010.

D. Final evaluation report for dc-dc converters by 9/30/2010.

Monthly Progress Reports: The contractor shall prepare and forward to the technical

representative a monthly progress report defining the month's technical progress and the

future month's planned activities.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Contractor shall have experience in coordinating technical input from multiple engineers

and integrating information into engineering documents including technical summaries,

concept of operations documents, engineering requirements, engineering design, quad

charts, graphic presentation formats, etc. Additionally, the contractor shall have space

flight hardware experience, with special expertise in power systems, radio,

communications, navigation, software, avionics and systems engineering.

Government Furnished Property

Lab facility, Bldg 54, Rm 34 and Rm 26.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/190.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Technical Representative: Fite, Brian

Task Number: NNC07E190T - 7

Task Title: Developmental Aerodynamic/Aeroacoustic Modeling, Design, and

Simulation

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 3/31/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by DE received on 11/13/2006, ljm

No-Bid by DR received on 11/01/2006, ljm

No-Bid by R received on 10/30/2006, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20061031 on 10/30/2006, ljm

Current day aviation design practice requires detailed understanding of the acoustic

performance of vehicles and components to achieve overall system design objectives.

Commercial aircraft must meet stringent noise requirements to be certified for flight and

be competitive in the marketplace. Military vehicles have seen increasing importance for

acoustic emissions to meet operational performance goals. Crewed space flight systems

need quiet atmospheric revitalization fans and electronic equipment cooling fans to

provide a safe, productive, and comfortable environment during long duration

exploration missions. The RTA/Acoustics Branch conducts research to understand the

fundamental physics responsible for noise generation and mitigation. Additionally,

capability is developed to model, analyze, and predict noise levels for these applications

with a primary research focus on civil aviation noise reduction.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

*** SOW Updated as of August 2009 for AFP 7 ***

The contractor shall provide the necessary technical expertise to support the

development of computational tools and procedures for Aeroacoustic simulations.

Expertise is needed to perform complex 2D and 3D aerodynamic simulations which

supply necessary parameters for subsequent acoustic analysis. Additionally, conceptual

and detailed aerodynamic design for low noise fans, ducts, inlets, etc. will be needed.

Hardware designs, when tested, are expected to match design intent operating

performance parameters which will be measured in subsequent experiments. Design

parameters will be provided by NASA and/or as a result of analysis and research on

existing systems or system components. Experimental support will be provided as

required.

General Scope of Work
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/190.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

******The governments estimated overall period of performance for this task is April 1,

2009 though August 31, 2011. The governments estimated period of performance for

the current deliverables is October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. The contractor

shall use demonstrated skills and validated 3D viscous CFD tools, specifically SWIFT (or

validated tool with same or better capability), to model and analyze design and offdesign performance of modern low noise fans and flow systems. Acceptable code

validation data must include hardware within acoustic branch experience. Work shall be

completed independently with minimal guidance once overall objectives are established.

If possible, analytical results will be validated using existing test data provided by NASA.

Once analyses are validated, analytical flow field parameters will be used for subsequent

acoustic assessment by NASA.

Demonstrated aerodynamic design capability shall be utilized to generate new

aerodynamic designs that solve specific problems deemed responsible for noise

generation in fans, ducts, and flow components of turbomachinery systems.

Contractor shall possess programming skills required to perform tasks such as: create

and implement new subroutines and/or code modifications that generate grid,

implement improved turbulence models, implement new solution algorithms, apply

loading, extract parameters, or generate design geometry.

Proven capability will be required for coupling independent analytical solutions of specific

components and flow regions to obtain an overall “system” solution as required by the

particular problem of interest. This allows simultaneous solution of disparate grids that

are linked by common boundaries as may be the case for bypass ducts, flow passages,

etc.

Experimental research support will be provided as needed to define and calibrate

measurement systems, acquire data, and process data to meet research requirements

and support ongoing acoustic research. 

Specific tasks include:

1. Complete documentation of space fan CFD analysis completed during performance

period 6 but not documented due to funding limitations.

2. Provide CFD analysis of over-rotor acoustic treatment tested with the Fan Trailing

Edge Blowing fan blades. Unsteady analysis shall be used if deemed appropriate. Define

detailed flow characteristics of tested configuration and consult on potential flow impact

on acoustic treatment. Prepare report documenting results of analysis and present to

interested parties.

3. Complete aerodynamic design of a new fan and fan exit guide vane for an existing

air-driven turbo-propulsion simulator (TPS). The fan shall have higher bypass ratio

suitable for studying high bypass installed aerodynamics. The specific design parameters

are to be defined cooperatively with NASA. Document design in an engineering report

and present at two review meetings.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables and Milestones:

1. Deliver 2 (option for 3) contractor reports, and associated DVD of grid and solution

files, for task 1. These reports will document work completed for: 1) the existing fan, 2)

the new design, and, as an option, 3) a comparison of the two designs. These are to be
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/190.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

completed by November 13, 2009.

2. Provide over-rotor CFD analysis and associated report by March 31, 2009.

3. Provide TPS design and documentation by January 31, 2010.

4. Travel to support 4coordination meetings per year (this includes all tasks).

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Advanced engineering degree, PhD preferred, with extensive knowledge of

turbomachinery fluid dynamics. At least 15 years of professional aerodynamics

experience is desired. Candidate should have demonstrated accomplishments in code

application and development as well as turbomachinery aerodynamic design of research

hardware. Possess ability to understand, articulate, and propose actions related to

unusual and complex aerodynamic phenomenon in research hardware. The incumbent

must be capable of working independently with only general guidance. Must be

proficient in oral and written communication skills to clearly and succinctly describe and

document experimental results.

Advanced engineering degree, MS or PhD, with prior experience in flow measurements

inside rotating machinery using thermal anemometry. The incumbent shall have prior

experience with Matlab. The incumbent must be capable of working independently with

only general guidance. Must be proficient in oral and written communication skills to

clearly and succinctly describe and document experimental results.

Government Furnished Property

Government furnished property will include files and data describing geometry, loads,

experimental results, etc. Any measurement systems or sensors required will be

provided as well as access to appropriate calibration and test facilities.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/191.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Technical Representative: Cressman, Thomas

Task Number: NNC07E191T - 14

Task Title: SM Loads and Dynamics Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) is one system of the overall Constellation Project

and is America's new spacecraft for human space exploration. It will be able to carry

four astronauts to and from the moon and deliver six crew members and supplies to the

International Space Station. The CEV system consists of four elements: the Launch Abort

System (LAS), Crew Module (CM), Service Module (SM), and the Spacecraft Adapter

(SA). 

The NASA Glenn Research Center has been given the responsibility to manage the SM

and SA portion of the program. The SM/SA Structures element is the effort to design,

develop, integrate, test, certify, and deliver the SM primary structure, secondary

structure, and all structural components of vehicle equipment, including spacecraft and

component loads, dynamics, and stress analysis. This element includes the spacecraft

adapter structural capability to transition between the launch vehicle and the CEV.

In the area of Loads and Dynamics, additional support is needed to aguement the inhouse staff.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The effort required to augment tasks in suport of SM Load and Dynamics.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Provide services to integrate loads and dynamics effort for Service Module:

1) Plan and Coordinate loads and dynamics support within the SM Structures Team.

2) Be THE point of contact (POC) within the NASA SM team for information on loads and

dynamics (i.e., what are the latest loads and environments for design, for qual, etc.)

3) Be the SM Team’s interface with the LM Loads and Dynamics team (Nancy Tengler,

Keith Schlagel, etc.) and with the Orion Loads and Dynamics Working Group

(JSC/George James).

4) Be the SM Team’s eyes and ears into the Constellation loads and dynamics

community (Eli Rayos).

5) Support Orion PDR.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/191.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Key areas currently for SM include:

1) Check-out of SM FEMs for load cycle deliverables

2) Design load factors for primary and secondary structures

3) Vibration levels for SM component qualification

4 In-space loads (primarily on the arrays and high-gain antenna)

5) Involvement/coordination with Level 2 and Level 3 Loads Panel

6) Environmental testing at component and system levels.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables:

Weekly activity report and quad chart (as required).

Milestones:

Support Orion DAC4 POD ERB by 10/15/09

Support Orion DAC4 Closeout ERB by 4/15/10

Support LC5 Loads FEM drop to Level II by 11/15/09

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.)

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Engineering skills familiar with Constellation Level II documentation regarding system

requirements. Must also possess space flight hardware design, development and testing

experience, in particular in the loads and dynamics area.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/196.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Technical Representative: Thorp, Scott

Task Number: NNC07E196T - 10

Task Title: W7 ERB Multistage Compressor Support & Upgrade

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 08/07/2008, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20080813 on 08/05/2008, kcm

No-Bid by D received on 06/02/2008, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20080544 on 05/30/2008, ldk

TR Responsiblity Transfer to Code R on 2/27/2007, ldk

No-Bid by DR received on 12/08/2006, ldk

No-Bid by DE received on 11/29/2006, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20061120 on 11/28/2006, ldk

GRC has proposed the re-installation of the existing 76A and/or 76B compressor

hardware to perform facility checkout tests, returning the W7 facility to its originally

designed capabilities.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide engineering, procurement, design modeling/layout and drafting services as

required to support the W7 facility and compressor testing programs. This continued

activity shall focus on the re-installation of the existing 76A and/or 76B compressor

hardware to return the W7 facility to its originally designed capabilities.

Test cell research engineering and instrumentation support is required in the later part

of this period.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

** ***********NEW AS OF AFP7 - OCTOBER 1, 2009 *******

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

Provide engineering, design modeling/layout and drafting services to support the

proposed re-installation of the 76A and/or 76B compressor hardware to return the W7

facility to its originally designed capabilities. Early calculations demonstrate a 9:1

pressure ratio machine will require hardware to be designed to exhaust temperatures of
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/196.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

around 740 degrees. Activities shall include the development of final designs, analyses

and procurements to provide new hardware and recondition existing hardware that will

be needed.

This task was initiated in the previous evaluation periods. Design activity is near

complete for the Phase “A” Test hardware. Current work effort is expected to be limited

to following of the Phase “A” installation of hardware, finalizing assemblies and revising

documentation to reflect as-built changes. Design support is also expected to support

feasibility studies and possible new phases of testing. Test cell research engineering and

instrumentation planning support is also expected in the later part of this period.

Associated cost plan reflects a “level of effort” that is expected during the period. An

amendment may be required if work scope is different than expected.

Specific Work Elements

W7 Design Engineering Support 

a) Finalize Basic Rig related assembly drawings and remaining documentation in support

of Phase “A” hardware and facility “check-out” testing in FY10.

b) Provide W7 facility support during hardware installation as needed

c) Prepare drawings and documentation as needed to support new hardware

development.

d) Develop project ROM estimates for labor and hardware costs based on previous work

and experience to support new proposed test configurations. Based on actual work

definition, an amendment will be processed if required to adjust work plan.

e) Conduct project status meeting with the customer to continually review facility status.

f) Support ongoing research and instrumentation requirements related to the W7 facility

test plans. 

Fabrication Liaison and Procurement Services 

a) Continue to provide fabrication and procurement services for W7 facility support and

test hardware as requested by the GRC technical representative. The associated cost

plan has allocated funding for this period to finalize hardware procurements that had

been initiated in previous periods. Based on actual fabrication/procurement requests, an

amendment to the task may be submitted if required to add specific fabrication and

procurement dollars. 

b) Provide procurement services to support W7 cell operations including calibration

services, equipment and material purchases up to the allocated funding defined in the

associated cost plan for this period. Based on actual procurement requests, an

amendment to the task may be submitted if required to adjust cost plan accordingly.

c) Fabrication sub-contracts shall be closely followed and a periodic status report

provided to the GRC technical representative.

When fabrication and material cost estimates are identified in the associated cost plan,

they have been determined based on the currently defined task requirements in this

SOW, historical data and contractors' past experience for budgetary purposes. Once

designs are finalized and approved by the TR, competitive bids will be obtained as

required by the FAR prior to award.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

If travel and/or training are required under this task, the cost has either been budgeted

into the accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional

task requirements.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/196.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2009 to August 31, 2011

*******************************************************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

• Flow Test and facility checkout in FY10

Deliverables

• Interface design layout/model of multiple compressor configurations in W7 facility for

review and evaluation for feasibility.

• Supporting drawings, engineering analysis and calculations.

• Project planning and ROM estimates for required labor and hardware

• Final design layout & detail drawings required in support of project schedule

• Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Mechanical Engineers and Designers with experience in High Speed Rotating Machinery.

Also, experience with the methods, standards, and practices used for test articles in the

GRC High Speed Compressor Test Facilities.

Government Furnished Property

Existing research hardware to refurbish/modify

Pro-Engineer

Windchill

AutoCAD

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/200.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Technical Representative: Solano, Paul

Task Number: NNC07E200T - 10

Task Title: L/IMX Installation in 10X10

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

To support aeronautics research model into the 10x10 facility.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering, design and possibly fabrication services to aid in the installation of the L/IMX

model from ATK.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Details of the work needed include:

1) Attend regularly scheduled project meeting between research customer and ATK.

2) Interface with research customer.

3) Verify model installation is consistent with facility requirements as outlined in User Manual

for NASA Lewis 10-by 10- Supersonic Wind Tunnel, NASA TM-105626.

4) Develop installation drawing of L/IMX model into the 10x10 with appropriate supporting

hardware.

5) Identify any hardware necessary for facility integration.

6) Upon approval, design and possibly fabricate necessary hardware for facility integration.

7) Provide support for the project in any design and safety reviews.

8)Adaptor interfaces such as the bleed plug hardware that will mate up

with ATK pipe/tube elbows with the existing bleed plugs. Alternate

seal design is another example as Some contingency is still prudent as the ATK/NASA interfaces

are still being discussed.

9) Procure 100* dynamic pressure transducers. For estimation, this

are nominally 0.062" dia. Kulites capable of 305 deg. F. Actually specification will be developed

within 6 weeks. [*70 needed + 30 spares, 40 would replace the compressor face (AIP) rake

transducers].

10) Procure new servo-actuator valves per LIMX specification.

11) Calibration rigs for both the existing 10" plug (for the high speed flowpath) & for the new 12"

plug for the low speed flowpath. Estimate these test to be similar to the 15'/16" plug cals. that

used the 10x10 as a vacuum source.

a) design of adaptor hardware / coordinate use of bellmouths

b) fabricate hardware
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/200.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

c) conduct testing (this may be done with civil servant or FT

labor - but an estimate would be helpful in case we

can't support with existing CS or TFOME folks).

12) Design and fabricate an alternate low speed cowl surface. Max deviation from the baseline

cowl geometry should be less than 0.25" and nominally 0.1"

13) Conceptual design of an oxygen make-up system for the 10x10 SWT

heaters. System would be mounted in the tunnel heater arrays and targeted for nominal flows of

30#/sec at the Mach 3.1 matched flight temperature. Maximum flow capability sizing of 60#/sec

should designed into the system to allow growth for nominal Mach 4 temperatures.

14) Conceptual design of a second throat insert for the 10x10 SWT. The hardware would

nominally span the height of the tunnel (10')

on centerline with a maximum thickness of about 1' and a length of 15 to 20 feet. Provisions for

bleed would be designed into this hardware as well as by modifying the existing second throat

walls.

15) Modify translating probe per research

16) Modify bypass valves if needed

17) Develop, design & fab stereolithography model of LIMX

18) Design/fab inclinometer

19) Independent verification of strut extension analysis that was performed by ATK

20) Provide design/fab services to change the height of model in facility per research request

21) Government's estimated period of performance is 4/1/2009 thru 8/31/2011

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1) Installation drawing.

2) Drawings of any designed new hardware.

3) Analytical report showing that the installation of the L/IMX meets the required safety factors

for the required design load cases as described in NASA TM-105626.

4) Fabrication of any identified & approved necessary hardware.

5) Any/all hardware design and fabrication to be consistent with anticipated L/IMX model

delivery consistent with project schedule.

6) Stereolithography model

7) Monthly Progress Reports 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 45

Schedule 45

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Mechanical project engineering support, mechanical designing support, possibly fabrication

support.

Government Furnished Property
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/200.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:23 AM]

Pro/E models of existing 10x10 test section and upper strut box.

Pro-Engineer

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/202.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

Technical Representative: Palaszewski, Bryan

Task Number: NNC07E202T - 11

Task Title: Design and Fabrication of Mars EDL Model Hardware

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The plan for the Supersonic Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) project – Propulsive

Deceleration - is to investigate novel approaches for using rocket propulsion for slowing

an entry vehicle through the supersonic speed regime in a planetary atmosphere

(specifically focusing on Mars vehicle for human landings).

Testing in NASA 1x1 Supersonic Wind Tunnel (SWT) is planned for small scale engines

and entry vehicle models to demonstrate techniques for effective ignition, nozzle flow

fields, and engine start up transients.

Provide design and fabrication support to develop Mars EDL model hardware to be

tested in the 1x1 SWT. The government will provide specific requirements for each

planned phase of testing throughout the program.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide design and fabrication support to develop Mars EDL model hardware to be

tested in the 1x1 SWT. The government will provide specific requirements for each

planned phase of testing throughout the program.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

**Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to 03/31/2010**

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

Specific Work Elements

1) Task Management 

a) Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task; resolve problems and

keep the technical representative informed of all issues. The contractor shall prepare and

forward to the technical representative a monthly progress report defining the month’s

technical progress and the future month’s planned activities.

2) Design Engineering

a) Provide engineering and design services to develop the design of Mars EDL model
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/202.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

hardware meeting the criteria established in the document - "Requirements Document

(3.0); Supersonic Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL): Propulsive Deceleration 1x1 SWT

Testing" and also meeting the requirements for models installed in the 1x1 SWT.

3) Fabrication and Procurements

a) Provide fabrication and procurement services to support the development of the

required Mars EDL model hardware. Contractor shall also provide procurement services

as required to obtain cell hardware required to support the EDL testing, such as a high

speed camera, data acquisition system hardware and related accessories based on

specifications defined by the cell test engineers. After a design is finalized, cost

estimates will be refined and a task amendment may be required to adjust planned

costs accordingly.

b) Initiate, monitor and complete instrumentation of diffuser scale model hardware.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

• Mars EDL model design and hardware to be provided to support testing. 

Deliverables

• Results of analysis documenting model hardware meets all required criteria.

• Assembly and fabrication drawings of all Mars EDL model hardware

• Mars EDL model hardware shall be delivered to NASA Glenn in a shipping container

free from all damage and shall include an inspection report showing compliance of all

dimensions with the tolerances specified

• Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

N/A

Government Furnished Property

Pro/ENGINEER

AutoCAD

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/205.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

Technical Representative: Melcher, Kevin

Task Number: NNC07E205T - 11

Task Title: Advanced Controls Research for Aerospace Propulsion Systems

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The NASA Glenn Research Center conducts research programs in the area of aerospace

propulsion system control. Research is conducted to improve propulsion system

reliability, maintainability and operability through the development, implementation, and

demonstration of advanced control and health management methodologies. Specific

research areas include: 

• The development and implementation of robust and intelligent control methodologies

for advanced turbine engine systems.

• The development of robust and generally applicable condition monitoring techniques.

• Component and system modeling to support the development and validation of these

techniques.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide technologies to improve aerospace propulsion system

reliability, maintainability and operability, and shall provide propulsion system

simulations under nominal and degraded conditions to support the validation of these

technologies.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

NOTE: Revisions for this statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk (*)

Broad Scope of Work: Contractor shall research and develop advanced control and

health management methodologies. Contractor shall develop real-time and non-real-time

implementations of the methodologies and simulations to extend the current capabilities

of aerospace systems and components. Contractor shall validate all developed

techniques and resulting systems.

1. Support the planning of new advanced control projects and re-planning of existing

advanced control projects by providing input for technical content and schedule.

2. Develop, modify, exercise, and demonstrate propulsion system simulations in support

of advanced controls activities.

3. Develop and maintain expertise in current state-of-the-art real-time simulation and

control.

4. Provide written documentation of technical work. Present work at appropriate
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/205.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

meetings and conferences.

5. Review SBIR proposals in system simulation for advanced controls area.

6. Clearly communicate progress and issues in a timeframe and manner commensurate

with their impact.

*7. The contractor shall follow applicable NASA and RHC procedures when conducting

work in support of the branch.

Specific Work Elements: 

1. Aviation Safety Program/Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control (IRAC) Project 

1a. The contractor shall propose, test and evaluate various options for real-time

operation of C-MAPSS2 in flight simulator. Real-time operation shall be concurrent with

rendering of graphical out-the-window displays.

*1b. The contractor shall upgrade and configure the RHC Flight Simulator hardware and

software to implement and integrate NASA’s Risk Management Architecture (from AIAA2009-1873) with the C-MAPSS2/C-17 real-time simulation.

2. Aviation Safety Program/Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Project

*2a. The contractor shall evaluate alternative formulations of the portion of the

Systematic Sensor Selection System (S4) merit function associated with fault isolation

performance. The correlation of this portion of the merit function to actual fault isolation

performance, including fault correct classification rate and fault mis-classification rate,

shall be evaluated through Monte Carlo simulation-based studies.

*2b. The contractor shall update the Systematic Sensor Selection Strategy (S4) User’s

Guide and software based on peer review feedback received through the C-22 review

process.

3. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance at technical and/or technology

transfer meetings, presentations or research papers, and in acquiring training or course

work useful for enhancing capabilities in performing this task.

3a. NASA does not intend to fund any trips by the contractor during this performance

period.

4. Other

4a. The contractor shall complete and submit a status report summary for the entire

performance period that addresses performance criteria for each milestone/deliverable

described in this statement of work.

4b. As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include

any open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements)

including any mitigation activities.

4c. The contractor shall comply with the Center Level Procedure GRC-P2.6.4,

"Implementation - Software Development".

NOTE: Revisions for this statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk (*)

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

NOTE: Revisions for this statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk (*)

1. Aviation Safety Program/Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control (IRAC) Project

*1a. Based on contractor’s previous recommendations, the contractor shall further

investigate and document potential improvements to the out-the-window display

enabled by the use of the Microsoft ESP graphical software. Due by 3/31/2010.

*1b. The contractor shall evaluate and document approaches for implementation of

NASA’s Risk Management Architecture with the real-time integrated C-MAPSS2/C-17

simulation running on NASA Glenn’s flight simulator hardware. Due by 1/31/2010.

*1c. The contractor shall implement the generic structure of NASA’s Risk Management

Architecture with the real-time integrated C-MAPSS2/C-17 simulation running on NASA
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/205.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

Glenn’s flight simulator hardware. Due by 3/31/2010.

2. Aviation Safety Program/Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Project

*2a. The contractor shall document and deliver to NASA the fault isolation merit function

evaluation results. These results shall include analysis of the correlation between the

merit function and fault isolation performance (correct classification rate and misclassification rate), and a recommendation for the diagnostic merit function to apply

within S4. Due by 3/31/2010.

*2b. The contractor shall obtain C-22 approval for the S4 User’s Guide and release the

S4 software through the NASA GRC Software Repository. Due by 3/31/2010.

NOTE: Revisions for this statement-of-work are preceded by an asterisk (*)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 35

Schedule 35

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Highly skilled in development and implementation (including real-time) of control

methods and propulsion system simulations. Advanced programming in Fortran, C/C++,

Matlab/Simulink.

Government Furnished Property

Hardware and software testbeds. Matlab/Simulink software – License No’s 254274,

18747, 220189, & 321084.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/211.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

Technical Representative: Wernet, Mark

Task Number: NNC07E211T - 10

Task Title: Optical Diagnostics Integration Engineer

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/6/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The NASA Glenn Research conducts research in advanced propulsion systems to develop

revolutionary new propulsion concepts and also to improve the efficiency and performance of

more traditional propulsion systems under the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate. In

addition, NASA Glenn supports testing of entry vehicles for inter-planetary science missions

under the Science Mission Directorate. Nonintrusive measurements of flow field velocities within

and around these advanced propulsion systems and/or re-entry vehicles are required in order to

gain insight into the fundamental flow physics and also for validation of Computational Fluid

Dynamics (CFD) models of the flow field. Nonintrusive techniques are preferable over intrusive

probes which may disturb the flow and also may not survive the harsh environments encountered

in these advanced propulsion systems. Test facilities supported include aeroacoustic research

facilities, turbomachinery facilities, Propulsion Systems Lab and the 8x6, 9x15 and 10x10

research wind tunnels at GRC. Within the genre of nonintrusive velocimetry techniques, planar

techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Doppler Global Velocimetry (DGV) are

more desirable than traditional point based techniques such as Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV).

PIV and DGV provide instantaneous planar measurements of the flow velocity that can be used to

compute first and second order flow statistics for validation of CFD predictions and verification

of prototype propulsion system performance.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Develop the hardware and software to support the implementation and application of minimally

intrusive, laser-based velocity measurement systems in turbomachinery, Pulse Detonation Engine

systems, and aeroacoustic ground based propulsion research. These optical diagnostics systems

may also be applied in subsonic and supersonic wind tunnel facilities. Specific work objectives

will be to interact with facility engineers to develop the necessary hardware and software for

implementation of optical diagnostics. The hardware requirements are defined as the

infrastructure required to support laser and camera systems in wind tunnels. Integration of the

optical diagnostic systems is performed through the use of 3-D CAD visualization software. The

software requirements are defined as developing data acquisition and data reduction systems for

the different optical diagnostics being applied. An in depth understanding of image processing

and mathematical theory are required. Work requires substantial initiative and problem solving

abilities; broad objectives will be given but specific implementation methods are to be determined

by the contract engineer.

General Scope of Work
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/211.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

SOW Summary Should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific task to be performed

******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: April 1, 2009 to August 11, 2011 -

Completion of GESS-2 Contract. Base plus 3 Options******

The contractor shall:

1. Work with the optical diagnostics engineers to understand planned programs utilizing optical

diagnostic systems. Interact with facility engineers to determine any hardware design or

fabrication required in order to obtain optical access or support the installation of the optical

diagnostics hardware into the facility.

2. Design and oversee fabrication of mechanical components for optical diagnostic techniques for

application to both in-house and customer research rigs and components. 

3. Consult with researchers on new diagnostic techniques and systems, in order to understand the

unique measurement requirements for the specific diagnostics. Stay abreast of current

measurement technologies and improvements in laser and detector technology with regard to their

application and enhancement of nonintrusive measurement systems development.

4. Develop software required for improved data acquisition, processing and display of research

data. Process acquired research data and provide researchers with flow measurement velocity data

in physical units. Develop techniques for integration of flow measurement data with CFD

predictions.

5. Write reports and present conference papers.

6. Assist in the preparation of research proposals to support continuation of optical diagnostics

technology development and application.

7. Travel in accord with requirements for attendance of technical and/or technology transfer

meetings, presentation of research papers, and in acquiring training or course work useful for

enhancing capabilities in performing the task. Travel may also be required for support of research

tests at other NASA Centers or customer facilities.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1. Monthly progress reports, which shall include:

A.Technical developments, progress and analysis, and evaluation of all task specific projects.

B.Technical achievements or issues.

2. Software/hardware, testing equipment/materials, and optics shall be procurred as needed to

meet task requirements.

Task reviews will be conducted bi-anually for the purpose of evaluating task performance

according to predetermined measurables. Revisions, if required, will be tracked via monthly

reports and modifications will be jointly agreed upon by the Task Manager and the TR as they

relate to the performance rating of this task.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/211.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:24 AM]

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 20

Schedule 50

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experience with optical system design/layout concepts and optical diagnostic techniques is highly

desirable. Experience with computer aided design software packages is beneficial. Familiarity

with image processing and a strong foundation in mathematics is required for developing data

reduction software. Experience with surface measurement probes and knowledge of

instrumentation electronics is desirable. Programming experience in C, C++ and Fortran are

required and proof of competency must be presented. Familiarity with digital image file formats

is required. Candidate will be expected to learn the theory and operation of laser systems and on

the job training will be provided. The ability to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams and/or

independently is required. Good time management skills, oral and written communication skills

are required.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/219.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

Technical Representative: Speier, Henry

Task Number: NNC07E219T - 9

Task Title: SPF 3-D Modeling and Thermal Vacuum Design

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

To 3-D model the Plum Brook Station Space Power Facility. To 3-D model the existing

cryogenic coldwalls in a new CEV configuration.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Contractor shall provide the necessary personnel and materials required to further

mature the Pro-E 3-D model of SPF and support the design associated with the GSE

equipment related to the CEV Integrated Environmental Test CONOPS and Thermal

Vacuum testing. The engineering effort shall integrate the structural analysis with the

design task.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

Task Management: Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task: resolve

problems and keep the NASA technical representative informed of all issues as they

arise. The Contractor shall prepare and forward to the NASA technical representative

monthly progress reports defining each month’s technical progress and the future

month’s planned activities.

Design:

Expand the fidelity of the existing Pro-E 3-D model of the SPF to support CEV Integrated

Environmental Test CONOPS and Thermal Vacuum Testing operations.

Develop structural designs for GSE handling equipment and structural hardware

interfacing between the facility and Lockheed Martin.

Further mature structural models of thermal vacuum cryoshroud and heat flux cage.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Design Activities:

1. Complete facility penetrations modeling in vibroacoustic highbay and test chamber

and enclosure.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/219.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

2. Complete cable route model (4 positions).

3. Partial model of South Gallery, West end.

4. Develop cryofloor CEV adapter model.

5. Cryowall quadrant handling fixture preliminary design sufficient for hand calc analysis.

6. Cryowall mast preliminary design model changes based on stress mods.

7. Develop heat flux system array model.

8. Develop heat flux system array attachment to cryofloor CEV adapter model.

9. Develop solid model for ANSYS analysis of the aluminum test chamber loading

analysis. Mike Henry, Code H, will provide the detail information on what is needed for

the analysis.

10. Cryoceiling conceptual design model.

11. Cryowall quadrants and ceiling assembly highbay storage beam structure preliminary

design.

12. Update existing cryogenic pipe layout (chamber only) model.

Engineering Activities:

1. Cryofloor CEV adapter w/heat flux system connection stress analysis.

2. Cryowall quadrant handling fixture stress analysis.

3. Cryowall mast stress analysis update.

4. Cryofloor stress analysis with CEV adapter and loads.

5. Cryowall quadrants and ceiling assembly highbay storage beam structure preliminary

stress analysis.

6. Piping flexibility analysis for cryogenic piping in chamber.

7. Aluminum chamber stress analysis

Reporting Activities

1) Monthly Progress Reports

2) Engineering Analysis Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Pro Engineer detail modeling.

Autocad drawing.

Structural Design Analysis Capabilities

ANSYS Structure Model Design Capabilities

Government Furnished Property

Pro Engineer

Autocad

ANSYS

Safety and Assurance Plans
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/219.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

Technical Representative: Tofil, Todd

Task Number: NNC07E224T - 16

Task Title: Communications, Navigation&Networking Configurable Test-bed

(CoNNeCT)- Engineering Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Critical CLV/CEV task review not required, 4/5/2007 Cestaro. 

The GRC Space Communication Division is supporting the development of Software

Defined Radio (SDR) technology through the Space Communication and Navigation

Office at Headquarters. As part of the TRL progression of this technology, a spaceflight

demonstration is desired. With the recently identified manifest opportunity on ECL3, GRC

is actively proceeding in developing a preliminary flight design.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Support the GRC engineering team to develop a plan, schedule, preliminary design and

begin critical design following the PDR for an ISS payload spaceflight demonstration test

bed in support of Software Defined Radio (SDR) technology. The currently identified

manifest opportunity is on HTV2 in 2011. This task defines specific deliverables required

to prepare and execute the preliminary design phase of the CoNNeCT Project.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

TECHNICAL APPROACH: 

The GESS II Team shall perform the following:

The contractor shall work closely with the GRC Communications, Navigation and

Networking reConfigurable Testbed (CoNNeCT) Systems Engineering team to provide

project support and engineering services. The team will work with the Lead Systems

Engineer to develop a Flight and Ground System concept and to develop data products

for the Preliminary Design Review. The results of all activities will be reported to the

Lead Systems Engineer and distributed to individuals as defined by the Lead Systems

Engineer.

Work Elements:

Provide general Systems Engineering Support to Project Management and the Lead

Systems Engineer including: 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

Preliminary Design Review preparation and execution.

Assist in developing the Flight and Ground Systems concept.

Provide systems engineering content for the Baseline Systems Description (BSD). 

Provide input into the Risk Assessment and Mitigations.

Provide support to the Lead Systems Engineer and the Systems Engineering Team.

Provide updates to PDR Documentation.

Support CDR, which is expected in 2/2010.

This task will be divided into sub-tasks as follows:

Sub Task 1 - ISS/ELC/Launch Vehicle Interface 

Define the Launch Vehicle Interface and requirements. Define the Express Logistics

Carrier (ELC) engineering requirements. Define the CoNNeCT interfaces with the Launch

Vehicle and with the ISS. Develop the ISS Integration concept. Develop documentation

and reports as required. Define CoNNeCT interfaces with the carrier. Review Project

documentation as requested.

Sub-Task 2 Test, Verification and Validation Support 

Support Test, Verification and Validation planning for the CoNNeCT Flight System.

Support test planning and verification, as needed, for the breadboard and engineering

units. Support Test, Verification and Validation planning of the CoNNeCT Ground

System. Support development of the Test, Verification and Validation Plan, including

defining verification methods. Work with applicable discipline engineers to confirm

verification methods. Assist lead V&V lead in identifying and defining the analyses and

inspections that are required. 

Sub-Task 3 Requirements Development 

Work closely with the Lead Systems Engineer to support the CoNNECT engineering team

and to ensure technical integration across and within the CoNNeCT elements. Develop a

Ground Systems Requirements Document. Lead or participate in Ground Architecture

meetings weekly. Assist in the definition, clarification and interpretation of experiment

requirements. Decompose the Concept of operations Document and the Mission

operations Document into SRD requirements as appropriate. Support updates to PDR

documents; including the System Requirements Document and Flight Systems

Requirements Document. Review project documents as requested.

Sub-Task 4 Requirements Management Support 

Supply a requirements manager to use DOORS to control the CoNNeCT Systems

Requirements Document (SRD), Flight Systems Requirements Document (FSRD), Ground

Systems Requirement Document (GSRD) and the requirements flow down and the

verification definition. Perform initial input of level 4 documents into DOORs.

Sub-Task 5 Configuration Management

Provide a short term (through approximately mid October) Configuration Management

Analyst to define, develop, and implement the CoNNeCT CM and DM plans for both

hardware and software. Plans shall be applicable to each phase of the project and will

work toward predictable, repeatable, consistent, and measurable processes leading to

robust quality management of documents, hardware and software. Provide content for

the Documentation Tree. 

Subtask 6 ICDs 

Manage the development, maintenance and configuration control of the Interface

Control Documents for the payload subsystem to subsystem interfaces. The ICDs include

the RF ICD, JPL radio ICD, GD ICD, Harris ICD. Skills required include knowledge of

systems engineering, space flight development and communications theory. This tasks
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

continues through FY09.

Subtask 7 Comm engineering 

This function requires an end to end knowledge of space communication networks, RF

components, microwave theory, satellite communication and link budgets. The main task

is to verify that proper decomposition of STRD, SRD and FSRD requirements has

occurred and trace to the three radio specifications and the RF specification; and if not,

decompose the requirements into engineering requirements and flow them into lower

level documents.

Subtask 8 

Compile a compliance matrix to the level 1 requirements document,the Systems

Requirements Document, the Flight System Requirements document and work with the

level IV book managers to compile compliances for the level IV documents. The

compliance to the FSRD, SRD and Level 1's will be largely by rolling up the level 4

compliances defined by the level 4 book managers. Provide weekly schedule updates

and a monthly report.

Subtask 9 Ground Integration

Provide weekly schedule updates and a monthly report. Develop the approach for

ground processing at KSC and Tanegashima.

Work with appropriate personnel at KSC to coordinate KSC activities.

Work with launch site personnel to coordinate launch site activities.

develop flow of activities at KSC and Tanegashima. 

Subtask 10 Assembly, Integration and Test 

Work with the project payload team to define and develop the assembly and integrations

plans. Communicate with appropriate facility managers to prepare cost estimates and to

prepare for testing. Work with Manufacturing to prepare for hardware assembly Provide

weekly schedule updates and a monthly report. 

Subtask 11 

Project Title: CoNNeCT Standing Review Board (SRB)/Software Member

Provide an individual with expert knowledge and experience in the development of space

flight and associated ground software. This individual will also have strong experience

and knowledge in the development of space flight software and associated ground

software. The person will serve as a member of the Standing Review Board for the

CoNNeCT Project. This individual will assess and address technical concerns regarding

the project, specifically the software portion of the project. The following activities will be

required to conduct the Software Review task:

1. The person will need three weeks (120 hours) to prepare for, participate in, and

document the results of the review. This time will be used to attend the Software

Architecture Review on June 12, work with the lead software engineer to close SWRR

RFAs, review PDR documentation, attend the board on June 22nd, conduct interviews

with project personnel and prepare the board report. 

2. The review is scheduled to kickoff June 12, 2009 with a table top review of the

payload software architecture and should conclude around June 24th with the project

PDR board. 

3. A review summary report shall be generated that describes any major issues found

during the review and requests for actions to address these issues. It is expected that

the preparation and production of this report, along with an associated summary

presentation to project and engineering management, can be accomplished in 3 working

days. 

In addition, as a member of the SRB, the following activities will be required to conduct

this task:
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

4. The person will need to prepare for, participate in, and document the results of

various reviews. 

5. The person will need to actively participate in the reviews and support the Board

Chair.

6. When assigned to specific topics by the Board Chair, the person will need to review,

summarize and provide a detailed report as a subject matter expert to the Board Chair. 

Subtask 12 

Project Title: CoNNeCT Standing Review Board

Provide an individual with expert knowledge and experience in the development of space

flight hardware. This individual will also have strong experience and knowledge in the

development of system engineering approaches associated with space flight hardware.

The person will serve as a member of the Standing Review Board for the CoNNeCT

Project. This individual will assess and address technical concerns regarding the project

on an as requested basis. The following activities will be required to conduct this task:

1. The person will need to prepare for, participate in, and document the results of

various reviews. 

2. The person will need to actively participate in the reviews and support the Board

Chair.

3. When assigned to specific topics by the Board Chair, the person will need to review,

summarize and provide a detailed report as a subject matter expert to the Board Chair. 

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

This SOW is limited to the request for technical labor in support of project planning

scope definition and flight design. As the project milestones and deliverables are better

defined, it is expected that this task order will be amended to adjust work requirements

and staffing levels. 

Contractor shall plan on travel costs for up to 12 one person, two night trips to Goddard,

JSC or JPL for support engineering functions during this period.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables for Sub-Task 1:

1. Coordinate within CoNNeCT and JSC the development of the CoNNeCT to HTV

Interface Control Document. CDR draft by 1 month before CDR.

2. Coordinate with CoNNeCT, JSC and JAXA the CoNNeCT to HTV Interface Control

Document by January 2010

3. Coordinate the development of the CoNNeCT to ELC Interface Control Document. CDR

draft by 1 month before CDR

5. PDR Presentation material for CDR 2 weeks before the review.

6. Documentation and documentation review as defined by Lead Systems Engineer

7. Update the Payload Integration Agreement (PIA)

8 Submit exceptions to the ISS as required.

Deliverbles for Sub-task 2 V&V

1. CDR baseline of the Verification and Validation Plan. 

2. CDR version of the Verification and Validation Matrix, including methods, success

criteria, responsible engineer and 

3. CDR Presentation material due 2 weeks before the CDR. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

Deliverables for Sub-Task 3 Requirements Development 

1. Baseline Ground Segment Systems Requirements Document complete by Oct 20. 

2. CDR draft Revisions to the SRD and FSRD Documents, incorporate the responses to

RIDs\RFAs and internal comments.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 4 Requirements Management Support 

1. Input the revision of SRD and FSRD into DOORS.

2. Input Ground SRD in DOORS 

3. Put allocation matrix in DOORS. 

4. CDR Presentation material.

5 Put level 4 specs into DOORs.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 5 Configuration Management (through approximately mid Oct)

1. Maintain and update Project Office Action Log Database

2. Maintain control over CoNNeCT Documentation, Data Product, Analyses, Drawing

numbers.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 6 (ICDs)

1. JPL Radio ICD Management, GD Radio ICD Management, Harris Radio ICD

Management and RF Subsystem ICD management. Oversee baselining of these

documents.

2. CDR Presentation inputs.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 7 Comm Engineering: 

1. Decomposition of RF and Comm requirements into the FSRD.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 8:

Compliance matrices for the Level 1 requirements, SRD, FSRD and GSRD by CDR.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 9: Ground Integration

1. Update Ground Integration Plan by CDR. 

2. Develop ground handling tasks, flow and durations.

3. Develop ground handling/shipping methodology by CDR. 

Deliverables for Sub-Task 10: Assembly Integration and Test

1. Develop pre/post ship check-out testing by CDR 

2. Develop resource requirements (supplies, GSE, facilities, personnel, budget)

3. Identify safety hooks and requirements by facility (preliminary content)

4. Write the Assembly, Integration and Test Plan.

5. Write the STA test plan and procedure; the Vibration test plan and Procedure, the EMI

test plan and procedure; and the Thermsal Vac Test Plan and Procedure.

Deliverables for Sub-Task 11

Generate RIDs and RFAs as appropriate for the milestone reviews.

Deliverable for Sub-Task 12: 

Generate RIDs and RFAs as appropriate for the milestone reviews.

General Deliverables:

1. Reporting

a. Monthly Progress Reports

General deliverable

1. Monthly Report

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/224.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Appropriatew to the Scope of Work for each sub task. Skills for Subtasks 11 and 12

include knowledge of requirements devlopment and management. The individuals need

to work well with others and need to be highly motivated.

Government Furnished Property

Pro/ENGINEER

E-Room Access

Windchill Access

Thermal DesktopTM or Patran

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/230.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

Technical Representative: Liu, Nan-Suey

Task Number: NNC07E230T - 5

Task Title: CFD Modeling of LOX/Methane Injectors and the Service Model

Radiator

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/5/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The task will provide insight into the operation of the Service Module (SM) radiator for

the CEV as well as into the feasibility of designing LOX/CH4 Injectors for the lunar

surface ascent engine.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

CFD analysis to include grid generation for supplied geometries, running specified cases,

and modifying codes as required.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

********Government's Estimated Period of Performance: October 1, 2009 to August 31,

2011 (Completion of GESS-2 Contract)******** 

The tasks effort will be divides aproximately 50/50 between the SM radiator modeling

subtask and the injector modeling subtask.

A CFD model of the CEV SM radiator and related syatems will be developed. The

modeling will be performed with Fluent. A workststion and access to the Fluent software

will be provided by the government. The modeler will interact on a regular basis with the

SM Thermal team to design a lab experiment to validate the CFD model. The model will

be developed in stages. Appropriate operating conditions will be supplied by the SM

Thermal team to the modeler. A Final Report documenting each stage of model

development and results will be submitted to the SM thermal team at the conclusion of

the task. Some travel will be required.

The National Combustion Code (NCC a GRC developed and owned code) will be utilized

to develop models of candidate LSAM injectors. The modeler will consult with GRC RP

branch personnel to ensure that the combustion and thermal phenomena affecting

injector performance are adequately modeled. The modeler will generate computational

grids suitable for use with NCC from supplied injector geometries. The modeler will

perfom computations with the developed model at operating conditions of interest to the

GRC RP branch. The modeler with perform/cordinate any improvements to NCC to

enhance its accuracy or efficeincy required for the igniter modeling task. The work will
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/230.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:25 AM]

be documented by reports.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

********New for AFP7********

Task I – Orion Purge Analysis

1. Service Module, Spacecraft Adapter, and IU: Hydrogen Leak Simulation

Milestone 1 : Documentation Report (1/20/10)

2. Orion Purge System Thermal Simulation

Milestone 2 : Documentation Report (5/21/10)

3. Orion SM Radiator Fluid Flow Simulaion

Milestone 3: Documentation Report (9/30/10)

Task 2 - CFD Work for Analysis of Aerojet Ascent Main Engine (AME) at NASA GRC

1. Study the following parametrics:

a.Effect of film-cooling flow-rate on injector performance

b.Effect of (reduced) chemical-kinetics model on performance

c.Effect of spray-models (e.g. atomization) on system performance

2. Post-process CFD results and present to NASA/Aerojet team 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Familiar with CFD modeling and codes for combusting and thermally driven systems.

Familiarity with running highly parallelized codes on a supercomputer. Ability to excercise

sound engineering judgement.

Government Furnished Property

Computer workstation and access to Fluent software.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/232.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

Technical Representative: Bulzan, Dan

Task Number: NNC07E232T - 8

Task Title: CE-13C Combustor Rig Facility Conversion

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The test cell CE-13C is being converted from a laboratory for fuel reforming research to a

laboratory for fundamental combustor and alternative fuel research. The purpose of this task is to

look at the overall facility design and integration.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

1. Compare existing hardware capability with the requirements for the new combustor rig. This

includes both mechanical engineering and electrical engineering support.

2. Design equipment, facility instrumentation, control, piping, and utility tie-ins to meet the new

research requirements.

3. Ensure that facility meets all applicable NASA safety regulations and all applicable design

codes.

4. Purchase or make any required hardware.

5. Support NASA in facility permits, including safety permit.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

1. Contractor shall be responsible for the work described in task order description above (facility

analysis and design, procurement/fabrication of required hardware.)

2. Government will be responsible for providing facility requirements and design guidelines,

facility build-up, check out, development of operating procedures, and the data acquisition and

facility control system (Labview).

3. Government will provide the required quench cooler.

4. Contractor shall support the government in obtaining a safety permit.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

*Design documents

-overall summary 

-equipment design

-data sheets

-PID's
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/232.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

-parts list

-instrument list

-equipment layout drawing

-piping isometric

-vendor documentation, including operating instructions

-instrument calibration sheets

-electrical area classification

*All required hardware, including equipment (e.g., heater), piping and fittings, pressure relief

valves, and instrumentation and control valves.

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 40

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Electrical engineering

Mechanical engineering

Drafting

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/234.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

Technical Representative: Downey, Joseph

Task Number: NNC07E234T - 5

Task Title: Space Telecommunications Radio System (STRS) Research Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The long-range vision of this project is to develop integrated communications systems

that improve current service capabilities and enable new services to NASA missions, and

reduce NASA’s costs.

This work area addresses the long-range vision of enabling improved/new services to

NASA missions. This includes developing re-configurable transceiver architectures and

technology advancements, and development of an integration and system-level

performance evaluation capability to demonstrate system performance in a relevant

system environment.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The purpose of this task to develop a re-configurable transceiver open architectures

including the development or study of SDR systems, software/computer engineering, and

digital signal processing. Software and firmware will be developed and used on the

CONNECT flight experiment, scheduled for launch in 2011.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

1) CONNECT Support

Participate in the advocacy, design, development, and implementation of the Space

Communications and Navigation Communication, Navigation, and Networking Tesbed

(CONNECT). Serve as a point of contact for one or more of the CONNECT SDR platforms

or waveforms. Support the payload build-up and integration testing. 

Develop specification and budget development of the equipment needed for the SDR lab

for CONNECT (i.e. EDS).

2) STRS Architecture Design and Reference Implementation

Update the STRS Architecture description and standards as required and participate in

STRS compliant reference implementation(s) definition. Contribute to the presentations

on the details of the reference implementation architecture to other NASA centers, SDR

Forum Space Working Group, and project briefings. Present architecture definition and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/234.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

advancements in appropriate forums.

3) SDR Forum Collaboration

Support the SDR Forum’s space related activities, especially the Space Working Group.

Keep abreast of the lasted technologies and trends for SDRs as they apply to NASA

missions and the STRS Architecture.

4) FPGA Firmware Developers Interface (FDI)

Recommend firmware rules for abstraction of the STRS waveform implemented in the

Signal Processing Module. Standard FPGA wrapper interfaces or firmware APIs could be

a part of these rules. Consider standards already employed in FPGA IP cores. Utilize the

SDR Forum’s resources as appropriate. Collaborate with the JTRS’s Network Enterprise

Domain Test & Evaluation group (SPAWAR, Charleston) and their Waveform Portability

Guidelines, as appropriate.

5) CONNECT Baseline TDRSS Waveform

Lead development of an STRS-compliant Data Group 2 TDRSS waveform for CONNECT.

Coordinating the collaboration with GSFC waveform developers is an important part of

this work element. Development of the waveform will initially be done on a groundbased SDR-3000, and then ported to NASA JPL’s CONNECT SDR (breadboard, flight, and

engineering models). Maintain close coordination with JPL’s STRS Operating Environment

activity. Model-based design development should be utilized with the

Matlab/Simulink/Synplicity or other appropriate toolset.

6) SDR/STRS Technology Validation Lab

Support the operation of the GRC SDR/STRS laboratory development and operations.

Key tasks include developing system diagrams, manage and control the laboratory

configuration, execute appropriate test plans, and document results. Maintain and

configure reconfigurable hardware platform(s) to support architecture, waveforms, and

technology demonstrations. Platform(s) will support different architectures including

different versions of the JTRS SCA and NASA’s STRS. Conduct demonstrations of

reconfigurable systems in the GRC SDR Technology Laboratory. Maintain laboratory

equipment, calibration, and document and software configuration control.

Note: NDA’s with companies providing support and information to NASA may be

necessary to fully accomplish the task objectives.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestone /Deliverable 

The following deliverables are required to support the project schedule. Specific dates

can be updated during the period and task may be amended to adjust deliverables if

required.

1) December, 2009 - Report detailing the status and results of the verification of the

GRC/GSFC waveform against requirements using the JPL breadboard.

2) December, 2009 – Provide input to the draft verification plan of the CONNECT S-band

system for CDR.

3) December, 2009 – Provide input to the draft verification plan of the CONNECT Kaband system for CDR

4) December, 2009 – Complete compliance testing of the JPL breadboard system and

provide results report.

5) January, 2010 - Complete compliance testing of the GD breadboard system and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/234.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

provide results report.

6) January, 2010 – Report detailing the EDS assembly status and remaining issues.

7) March, 2010 – Report describing results of the JPL pre-ship review.

8) March, 2010 – Report detailing design and plan for implementation of the method to

automatically control and collect analysis results on TVL laboratory equipment and to

collect test data for future analysis.

9) March, 2010 – Complete compliance testing of the JPL Engineering Model system and

provide results report.

10) March, 2010 – Port CoNNeCT Waveform to JPL Flight SDR.

• Monthly progress reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 35

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

This task will require personnel with the previous knowledge of the Space

Telecommunciations Radio System architecture. It also requires the knowledge of the

developments leading to the Communications, Navigation, and Networking (CONNECT)

Testbed. Knowledge in digital communications, firmware development, software

development, and communication systems.

Government Furnished Property

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY:

The existing hardware and software furnished to the previous contractor should be

made available.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/242.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

Technical Representative: Krantz, Timothy

Task Number: NNC07E242T - 8

Task Title: Spur Gear Fatigue Rig Upgrade

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/17/2009 - 3/31/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Why the project is being pursued 

No-Bid by D received on 06/26/2007, ldk

Entered as WISE Task 20070618 on 06/20/2007, ljm

GRC has conducted spur gear fatigue test research for more than 30 years. The testing

has proved valuable, and GRC continues to see this need for future aeronautics work. As

time has passed and gear technology improved, required testing times has increased.

Even though GRC has a set of 6 such rigs, the rigs that were designed many years ago

is now only marginally capable of today’s highest-quality testing gears in reasonable time

because of torque limitations of the current rig. GRC has also learned that the rig

dynamics are not optimal.

The NASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program, Subsonic Rotary Wing project has decided

to invest in a new rig design, fabrication, and commissioning. The desire is to have a set

of three rigs. 

To maintain some history of the task, the main accomplishments during periods prior to

AFP6 were as follows:

- completed a conceptual design trade study and produced ROM cost estimates for

various design solution strategies

- assessed strategy to complete design via vendor supplying a full “turn-key” solution vs.

purchasing components with NASA and GESS contractor acting as the integrator; decided

on a turn-key solution

- completed the process of detailed SOW, accepting bids and proposals, proposal

review,, and selection of “Superior Controls” as the vendor 

- managed the procurement and delivery of two rigs to NASA GRC in spring of 2009

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering support is needed to complete the task of delivering to NASA test machines

fo rspur gears that meet NASA's specifications. The work includes defining the

appropriate procurement method (as was accomplished in AFP5) and then managing the

procurement, delivery of rigs and engineering design packages to GRC, and verification

that the machines meet the government's specifications and the vendor's guarantee.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

General Scope of Work 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/242.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed 

Gov't estimated Period of Performance April 1 2009 - March 31, 2010

*************Edit of SOW for AFP7 – Aug 17, 2009 *******

On Aug 17, 2009 the SOW and milestones were edited slightly to best reflect the

chaninging funding situation and technical needs of NASA as follows:

- All milestones referencing to a third test machine have been eliminated; although there

is a technical need, it has become apparent the desired and required funding is unlikely

to become available in FY10; if this situation changes and if NASA still requires

contractor support for a third machine a new task will be initiated

- A new numbered item was added to the SOW listing (#9 below) requesting

engineering analysis and procurement actions for spare parts for the new test machines

*************End of Edit of SOW for AFP7 – Aug 17, 2009 *******

Engineering support is needed as follows

The contractor shall continue to manage the procurement contract with Superior Control

that was started in AFP5. In the following statements the word “vendor” refers to the

Superior Controls company. Some of the main responsibilities of the contractor are as

follows:

1. The contractor shall review any proposed design changes or augmentations to the

Test System as might be proposed by the vendor. The contractor shall assist NASA to

determine any impacts on the proposed change relative to the test rig performance

specification, cost, and schedule. NASA will be responsible for accepting or declining any

change that would negatively impact cost, schedule, or performance. The contractor

shall have the option of making decisions on design or fabrication details if the available

choices meet cost, schedule, and performance.

2. The contractor shall monitor the vendor’s progress during the fabrication phase and

guide and influence the vendor as possible within the constraints of the contract

between the contractor and the vendor to meet delivery schedule. 

3. The contractor shall keep an awareness of the facility preparation being done by

NASA. While the contractor is not responsible for execution of the facility preparation,

the contractor shall keep coordinated with NASA’s preparation and shall notify the task

Technical Representative if NASA’s preparations in terms of capability or schedule are

not consistent with the vendor’s solution and schedule.

4. The contractor’s procurement with the vendor calls for delivery of 2 machines while

NASA’s requirement is for 3 test machines. Once the vendor delivers the final

engineering design package to the vendor, the contractor shall request a bid from the

vendor for a third test machine. The contractor shall also assess if a third machine could

be built by another vendor (or vendors) at lower cost using the final engineering and

fabrication drawing for the 2 test machines. The total task value shall be estimated for 3

test machines even though NASA has not yet identified total funds for the third machine.

5. The contractor shall arrange for a visit to the vendor’s site (per the vendor’s contract)

to observe the operation of the test machine and verify performance. The contractor

shall suggest to NASA a set of operations that can be used to verify performance during

the visit to the vendor’s site. The contractor shall attend the site visit and shall assist the

NASA TR to determine that the test machines are ready for delivery to GRC.

6. The contractor shall arrange for delivery of the test machines to GRC and coordinate

the logistics to transport the test machines to the test cell CE-1 in Bldg 5.

7. The contractor shall review the final engineering package to be delivered with the test

machines for completeness and conformance to the vendor’s contract. The reviewed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/242.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

package shall be delivered to the NASA TR.

8. The contractor shall observe the performance of the test machines during early

operations at GRC making sure that the test machines meet specifications. If deficiencies

are found and are determined to be covered by the vendor’s guarantee, then the

contractor shall take action to correct deficiencies via the guarantee. If the deficiencies

are due to an improper specification by NASA, the contractor may choose to offer a

solution to the NASA TR. At that time the NASA TR will determine if the solution is

appropriate and if necessary would then provide an amended Task Request.

*************Edit of SOW for AFP7 – Aug 17, 2009 *******

9. The contractor shall complete a technical analysis of the final delivered rig design and

recommend a set of spare parts that should be procured assuming operation of the rigs

for a five year timeframe. Provide a procurement strategy consistent with available

funding and obtain feedback from NASA TR. Place orders for spare parts as needed, but

orders are not to exceed approved, obligated budget.

*************End of Edit of SOW for AFP7 – Aug 17, 2009 *******

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables and Milestones to be met 

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits 

June 15 – March 30, 2010 Verify the performance of the test rigs in operation at GRC,

identify any deficiencies and suggest solution via vendor guarantee or via task

augmentation as appropriate

***** New milestone as of Aug 17, 2009 *******

Sept 30, 2009 Place order for spare parts intending to cover five years of operations of

the rigs. 

Deliverables:

Deliver two test rigs, final set of fabrication drawings, recommended set of spare parts,

and delivery of spare parts.

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 30

Schedule 40

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Execution requires knowledge and capability for

- mechanical system analysis 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/242.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

- refine general descriptions of experimental capability into detailed, quantified

requirments

- skills to manage the project schedule and communicate key information to NASA for

the major project decisions

- skills to verify machine performance

Government Furnished Property

AutoCad

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/243.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

Technical Representative: Frankenfield, Bruce

Task Number: NNC07E243T - 5

Task Title: Ares Upper Stage Compartment Purge & Haz Gas CFD Analysis

Task Details

Period of Performance

3/9/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 06/25/2007, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20070620 on 06/20/2007, ljm

The Ares I launch vehicle is being developed to support the NASA Constellation Program. The

Ares I vehicle design includes vented compartments, which are located between 1) CEV and

Upper Stage and 2) Upper Stage and First Stage. The Purge and Haz Gas Systems design must

verify the following requirements for these compartments: 1) prevent hazardous gas accumulation

and 2) provide hazardous gas detection. 

The NASA GRC is designing the purge ducting for the Ares I launch vehicle. The Purge System

ducting is made out of composites and are located in the Instrument Unit, Aft Skirt and

Interstage.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide CFD flow analysis of the Instrument Unit/Service Module (IU/SM) compartment volume

and the Aft Skirt/Interstage/First Stage Frustum compartment volume.

Provide stress/structural engineering and composite materials support for the Purge and Haz Gas

Detection Systems.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

**Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to September 3, 2010*****

The Contractor shall:

1) Use CFD to investigate if the GN2 purge gas circulation within each compartment.

2) Use CFD to investigate if a hydrogen and/or oxygen maximum spec leak rate would cause high

hazardous gas concentrations within the compartments.

3) Use CFD to correlate the gas concentrations at the compartment vent exits compared to gas

concentrations within other areas of the compartments.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/243.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

4) Use CFD to investigate if GN2 purge gas circulation maintains an acceptable safe environment

within the integrated IU & Orion shared volume compartment.

5) Provide testing and CFD analysis support for PHG testing at Plum Brook CCL and at MSFC

TD04/05. 

6) Provide a venting analysis during the ground purge flow at the launch pad.

7) Provide Stress/Structural Enginnering for the Purge & Haz Gas Systems (PHG) in the

following areas:

a) Determine the laminated composite properties for use in the finite element analysis(FEA) of

the purge system. Composite properties will be calculated and DEA results will verify the

structural performance of the purge ducts design.

b) A FEA will be conducted on all individual components of the purge duct system using static

and dynamic loads. The components include composite ducts and manifolds. A system analysis

includes assembled dudts/manifolds and reinforced hoses. The FEA is use to further optimize the

purge duct design. Maintain regular contact with MSFC Loads Team. 

c) Provide recommendations on the purge duct design to maintain structural integrity.

Recommendations shall be based on NASA standards and procedures, FEA, and other applicable

considerations.

d) Written Reports shall be provided to NASA with each significant analysis.

e) Attend weekly team meetings.

f) Provide inputs to update the P&HG Structural Verification Plan (Doc #005)for composite purge

duct materials.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Provide CFD analysis results for the Purge and Haz Gas Systems CLOR on 6/2010. 

Provide final CFD analysis to support Purge and Haz Gas Compartment Dev Testing TD04/05

scheduled for the summer of 2010.

Provide structural analysis report for the Purge and Haz Gas Systems CLOR on 6/2010.

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 70

Schedule 15

Cost 15

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Capability to model, run and analyze a CFD code that is capable to run multiple species gas flow

environments.

Government Furnished Property
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/243.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:26 AM]

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/246.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Technical Representative: Shalkhauser, Kurt

Task Number: NNC07E246T - 8

Task Title: EMC Verification Support for the Project Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Glenn Research Center (GRC) has the responsibility for qualification testing of the

integrated Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle. The CEV, which includes the Crew Module,

Service Module, and Launch Abort System, is a focal point of NASA’s Constellation

Program, which will carry human beings on missions to the International Space Station,

the moon, and Mars. In order to accomplish these missions safely, the CEV will be

subjected to a series of environmental qualification verifications at the Space Power

Facility (SPF) at Plum Brook Station near Sandusky, Ohio. Electromagnetic Compatibility

(EMC) characterization will be performed on the assembled vehicle as the first part of an

extensive test campaign, which also includes vibration and thermal/vacuum

characterization at the same facility.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide expert technical support and consultation to assist GRC in

the planning, preparation, and execution of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)

verification of the Project Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) under the GRC Space

Environments Testing (SET) Project.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

GRC requires expertise to support the following activities:

Work Element 1.0 - EMC Support

1.1 EMC Requirements Definition: The Contractor shall review and analyze EMC

requirements currently emerging from the NASA Constellation Program, the Orion Project

Office, and the SET Project. The contractor shall assist in validating that the

requirements are reasonable and verifiable as they relate to the integrated flight vehicle.

The contractor shall participate in the development and review of EMC

requirements/specifications by participation in NASA and Lockheed Martin formal and

informal reviews, and by review of EMC-related documents such as the CxP70080:

Constellation Program Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Requirements

Document and the CxP70141: Constellation Program Electromagnetic Environmental

Effects (E3) Control Plan. 

1.2 EMC Verification Planning: The Contractor shall participate and assist in planning and
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/246.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

definition of the EMC verification concept, developing the EMC facility requirements,

determining test equipment needs, and defining measurement schemes. Planning will

specifically involve design of specialized EMC equipment to be used within the

vacuum/EMC chamber at Plum Brook Station. The Contractor shall collect data necessary

for characterizing the EMC chamber and refining the design of the EMC verification

system. 

1.3 Verification Approach Consultation: The Contractor shall provide consultation and

advice pertaining to the test procedures and operations, and advising NASA on

compliance to EMC standards and standard practices. The Contractor shall participate in

EMC working groups as needed, will support NASA and NASA/LM teleconferences, as

well as representing GRC at meetings of the EMC Control Board (TBD). The Contractor

shall provide consultation on EMC chamber certification.

1.4 Verification Services: The Contractor shall provide EMC engineering and technical

support to collect data for verification of the Orion spacecraft. This work will involve

multiple setups, reconfigurations, and extended operation of EMC equipment, including

radiofrequency signal generators, amplifiers, transmitting and receiving antennas, and

signal receivers/analyzers.

1.5 Data Analysis: The Contractor shall assist NASA in the on-going acquisition, review,

and analysis of the acquired EMC data throughout the full term of the CEV effort, which

includes the characterization and certification of the empty chamber, and extends

through to the full-scale CEV integrated qualification.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include:

1. Provide review and comments on CEV EMC-related documentation, including

CxP70808: Constellation Program Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3)

Requirements, and CxP70141; Constellation Program Electromagnetic Environmental

Effects (E3) Control Plan.

2. Participation in meetings and teleconferences relating to EMC planning and

requirements validation. (On-going)

3. Plan and perform a preliminary GRC-based radiofrequency (RF) characterization and

RF leakage analysis of the SPF facility vacuum chamber. (Est.: October 2008 –

November 2009)

4. Provide written input for maintenance of CxP 72205 CEV SET Test Facilities

Requirements Document describing preparation of the Space Power Facility for EMC

testing. (On-going) 

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 20

Schedule 60
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/246.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The lead support position shall be a NARTE-certified EMC engineer with experience in

EMC verification, EMC data acquisition, and EMC analysis at the system and vehicle level.

Others supporting this task shall be under the oversight of the NARTE-certified

engineer/manager.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/248.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Technical Representative: Hall, Nancy

Task Number: NNC07E248T - 8

Task Title: ELS Flight Experiments

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

To provide support to ELS with testing components/subsystems in a relevant environment, ie

reduced gravity aircraft or drop tower.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering support for reduced gravity aircraft experiments or drop tower testing.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Contractor shall:

SUBTASK ONE:

Provide engineering support to complete modification to the VPCAR C9 rig to fly it in FY10, if

its selected during the Water Distillation Downselect process. Responsibilities include:

1) Evaluate and complete all mechanical open items that haven't been completed

2) Evaluate and calibrate all optical systems for optimum data analysis and collection

3) Evaluate and complete all open issues from functional testing 

3) Support ground base testing at GRC including system checkout, updating procedures and input

to test matrix

4) Support reduced gravity testing on plane at Ellington Field, Houston, TX

SUBTASK TWO:

If selected, provide support to the Systems Engineering Educational Discovery (SEED)

proposal(s) submitted by GRC. Responsibilities include:

1) Provide mentor support to the university team selected via telecon or videcon. (Note: Student

teams will be building up hardware, TEDP, etc support is mainly through email/phone)

2) Support reduced gravity testing on plane at Ellington Field, Houston, TX with university team

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Provide input to TEDP (Test Equipment Data Package)

Completed buildup rigs, diagnostics and facilities as outlined in scope of work.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/248.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 30

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Reduced gravity flight qualified engineers

Government Furnished Property

This task will involve the use of the reduced gravity aircraft, laboratories in Bldg 77 and 110 and

the small drop tower.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/250.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Technical Representative: Thomas, John

Task Number: NNC07E250T - 5

Task Title: Upper Stage Development Flight Instrumentation (DFI) Electrical Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

DFI will characterize the CLV during the first 5 flights.

No Changes

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

No Changes in Task Order Description.

Assisting in the development of the US DFI Requirements Document for the DFI system.

Providing electrical support in evaluating potential vendors and vendor bids.

Preparing laboratory space and equipment for Engineering Development Unit (EDU) checkout

Preparing documents in support of the major Ares, Upper Stage, Upper Stage Avionics reviews.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Government's Estimated Period of Performance is September 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.

There are no changes in the General Scope of Work.

NASA has the responsibility to design and procure hardware to characterize the CVL by

acquiring sensor data. Contractor End Item Specifications need to be written to procure the

hardware. The contractor shall assist the DFI lead in the development of contract end item

specifications for the master and remote data acquisition units (DAU) for the DFI system.

Additionally, the contractor shall provide electrical support in evaluating potential vendors and

vendor bids, preparing a laboratory space for Engineering Development Unit (EDU) checkout,

and in preparing documents in support of the major avionics reviews. The contractor shall

function as a member of the DFI team, and shall work with the DFI technical lead and project

manager to assure that all DAU-related work elements are completed.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/250.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include item 1 below, the other items are

included here for schedule purposes only:

1. Complete the US DFI Lab Build Up, with EDU Harnessing (12/15/10)

2. US DFI EDU Testing Without Telemetry System (4/30/10)

3. US DFI EDU Testing with Telemetry System (12/28/11)

4. DFI EDU's Available for integrated testing at SIL (if required) (3/15/11)

5. Avionics & Upper Stage CDR Document inputs (7/15/10)

6. ARES I-Y DFI flight hardware delivered to Michoud Assembly Facility (10/22/12)

7. ORION-1 DFI flight hardware delivered to Michoud Assembly Facility (11/23/11)

8. ORION-2 DFI flight hardware delivered to Michoud Assembly Facility (4/25/12)

9. ORION-3 DFI flight hardware delivered to Michoud Assembly Facility (9/17/12)

10. ORION-4 DFI flight hardware delivered to Michoud Assembly Facility (7/12/13)

Monthly reporting required for overall task status with any technical, financial or programmatic

issues which need resolving.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Knowledge in electrical engineering.

Flight hardware development experience.

Procuring engineering, Qual and flight hardware, also lab hardware.

Testing EDU, Qual and FLight hardware.

Government Furnished Property
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/250.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:27 AM]

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/254.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Technical Representative: Arida, Wade

Task Number: NNC07E254T - 6

Task Title: Evaluate Existing New Design of Windowed Test Sections for CE-5B

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

****************** New as of AFP7 08/20/2009, wta ********************

Changes to deliverable dates and statement of work's estimated period of performance (wta,

08/20/2009)

**********************************************************************

There was an ADF design and partial report generated for a new windowed test section for test

cell CE-5B located in ERB a few years back. There is a future need for an improved windowed

test section design for testing in CE-5B.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Please review the existing design and design report to verify test section design is and will be

fabricated to all applicable codes.

Changes to the design should include the following

Design to higher pressures (500psig)

Focus on the four window design vs. the three window design.

Focus on test stand 2 design and not test stand 1

Verify design and fabrication will comply with all applicable codes

Try to eliminate GN2 film cooling or use air cooling instead.

Keep the window as close to the combustion environment as possible (work with research

customers on this issue)

Verify existing subsystems will comply with the new design.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Provide necessary ANSYS and or Caesar analysis

Assist with any design and safety reviews

Assist with the buildup and fabrication of the test section and window hardware

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

****************** New as of AFP7 08/20/2009, wta ********************
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/254.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Final design completed by Nov. 2009

Hardware delivery and final design report by March 2009

**********************************************************************

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 10

Schedule 50

Cost 40

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Ansys and FEA analysis

Procurement assistance

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/256.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Technical Representative: Freeman, Carmela

Task Number: NNC07E256T - 4

Task Title: Facilities Project Drawing Set Updates

Task Details

Period of Performance

3/5/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This effort was being performed under task 98 and was split out to allow funding to be tracked

seperately from configuration related efforts on task 98. No increase in support was required.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Civil, Architectural, Plumbing, Building Electrical, HVAC, Piping, Energy Mgmt, Fire

Protection, High Voltage Electrical, etc. drafting services to convert Facilities Project Drawings

into As-Built Record Drawings and to enter them into the Facilities Engineering Drawing Mgmt

System.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Contractor shall update the Project drawings delivered at the end of construction and pick up the

red-line changes. It will also involve uploading manual versions to autocad for older projects that

make up the current backlog. Little or no field work involved.

Contractor shall work with the Facilities Division Project Manager to pick up all required changes

and route drawings for signoff.

***Government's Estimated Period of Performance is April 1, 2009 to the end of the contract,

August 31, 2011***

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Quarterly report listing the project sets updated during the quarter, any new projects received and

pending work.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/256.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experience with A/E drafting methods and standards.

Government Furnished Property

Facilities Project drawing sets.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/258.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Technical Representative: Petrarca, David

Task Number: NNC07E258T - 19

Task Title: ARES I X Drafting Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 10/31/2009

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The work is in support of the ARES I X project.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall supply designer services to support the design of segments SA, SM,

IS-1 and work in support of design and detailing on all segments of ARES. Provide

drafting support for ECS, weldment drawings, assembly drawings, IRD interface

drawings, and possible detailing over the entire upper stage.

Contractor shall support the development of the integration drawings.

Contractor shall supply designer services to finalize intgrated drawings and address

drafting issues that surfcae as a result of turnover. This task is not definite. Work may

be completed by end of March.

 Added August 2009

Provide for last minute assessments to support launch.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall supply designer services to address finalizing designs and

developing details for SA, SM, IS-1, and work in detailing on all ARES segments. Provide

drafting support for ECS, weldment drawings, assembly drawings, IRD interface

drawings, and possible detailing over the entire upper stage.

The contractor shall provide darfting services to develop the integration drawings as part

of the ARES I-X team.

Provide drafting services to support completion of integrated drawings for KSC and

address potential drafting issues that surface as a result of hardware turnover.

** *******revised task August 2009

Provide drafting services to assess general task in support of launch.**************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/258.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Milestones

*******Completion of assessments to support flight through October 2009)******

The contractor shall:

• Release all drawings and models into the ARES database.

• The contractor shall support the ARES I-X drafting schedule milestones.

• Provide Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Models and drawings for the integrated drawings and any models/drawings that were

revised after turnover.

*******Deliverables 

Completion of assessments to support flight.(October 2009)******

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Designer capable of doing both conceptual work and detailing and very good Pro/E

skills.

Government Furnished Property

n/a

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/259.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Technical Representative: Weiland, Karen

Task Number: NNC07E259T - 7

Task Title: Thrust Vector Control Project Configuration/Data Management

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 08/20/2007, ljm

No-Bid by R received on 08/17/2007, ljm

No-Bid by F received on 08/17/2007, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20070831 on 08/17/2007, ljm

The Launch Systems Project Office (LSPO) requires configuration management and

records management to achieve its goals and objectives. This task order provides that

support to the TVC project. The TVC project requires the establishment of configuration,

documentation, and records management to achieve objectives in an effective time

frame.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Contractor shall provide the necessary personnel and materials to provide

configuration management (CM) support for the Thrust Vector Control (TVC) Project.

The CM personnel shall ensure that the TVC project collects and properly dispositions all

documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received

by the project as evidence of the project’s functions, policies, decisions, procedures,

operations, or other activities.

The Contractor shall provide the necessary personnel and materials required to support

the conduct of TVC project reviews held at GRC.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

*******Government's Estimated Period of Performance: October 1, 2009 to Completion

of GESS-2 Contract Base plus 3 Options*******

*******Updated for AFP7 October 1, 2009*******

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

For the TVC project at GRC, conduct configuration/documentation/data identification,

configuration/documentation/data control, configuration/documentation/data status
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/259.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

accounting, configuration/documentation/data verification, and records control in

accordance with program/project requirements.

The Configuration Management Specialist’s support for the Thrust Vector Control project

focuses on configuration and data management, hardware and software process

improvement.

The Configuration Management Specialist works toward predictable, repeatable,

consistent, and measurable processes leading to robust quality management of

documents, drawings, hardware, software, and data.

During AFP7, the support will add a focus on defining and implementing the drawing

release process.

Specific Work Elements:

1. Become knowledgeable of modifications and new features of the WindChill CM

software.

2. Become knowledgeable of the DDMS system which is intended to replace Windchill for

the Upper Stage CM system. 

3. Implement the requirements of the Ares I and Upper Stage Configuration

Management Plans and flowing the requirements down to the Thrust Vector Control

Project.

4. Implement and maintain all aspects of configuration identification (including the

numbering scheme for hardware, software, and documentation, and labeling of

baselines), control (including the release process for hardware, software, and

documentation), and status accounting in accordance with the TVC Configuration

Management Plan.

5. Coordinate and provide materials support for Technical reviews as required by project

schedule.

6. Update and maintain CM requirements in the TVC CM Plan.

7. Implement CM Plan and Processes.

8. Update and maintain CM processes.

9. Implement records control.

10. Attend TVC Engineering Review Board, Project Control Board, Risk Review Panel,

and other meetings.

11. Coordinate, track and maintain contractor data deliverables.

12. Configuration manage design review documents.

13. Define design review tool (for example eRoom) user interface requirements.

14. Store, maintain, and distribute project data according to NPR 1441.1 and NPR

7120.5.

15. Define and implement a drawing release process.

Travel, as needed, to Upper Stage Production Contractor or their subcontractor sites,

Advanced Development Contractor sites, MSFC, KSC, MAF and SSC or other locations to

work configuration/document management issues with the NASA centers and

contractors.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Updated TVC Configuration Data Management Plan within 1 month of release of either

updated Ares I or Upper Stage Configuration Management Plans.

Records of receipt, review, and disposition of Data Requirement Documents from the

advanced development contracts that support GRC engineering.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/259.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:28 AM]

Records of configuration items/documentation/requirements numbered according to CM

Plan. 

Record of minutes and action items from TVC Engineering Review Board and Project

Control Board within 1 week of the meetings. 

Records of design review documents.

Documentation changes pertinent to TVC change orders implemented within 2 working

days of approved change.

Document status accounting reports as new baselines are established and upon request.

Document status accounting database accurate within 2 working days of changes.

Minutes for major project reviews, as needed, within 1 week of review board meeting.

Records collected, controlled, and dispositioned within the TVC project according to NPR

1441.1 and NPR 7120.5.

Baselines and releases of TVC Products for builds, incremental releases, and full releases

(as required). 

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 30

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

CM Specialists

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/265.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

Technical Representative: Otten, Kim

Task Number: NNC07E265T - 9

Task Title: CEV SET Vibroacoustics

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The CEV SET program has engineering design, analytical, and testing needs that

requires supplemental expertise above current resources in the vibroacoustic technical

field.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Perform design, analytical, and test tasks, and provide consulting expertise, as described

in General Scope of Work section below. This work is necessary to support the

verification of the vibroacoustics facilities at Plum Brook.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Provide high-level engineering support to NASA GRC Engineering (DEV) in the insight

and verification of the Mechanical Vibration Facility (MVF) at NASA Plum Brook Station’s

Space Power Facility (SPF), Sandusky, OH. Ability to meet critical aggressive schedule is

of prime importance.

Vibration Tasks (MVF): 

1) Provide updated dynamic FEM (NASTRAN) models of MVF design including exciter,

shaker table, seismic mass, head expander and other equipment. Transfer modeling

information and models to NASA. Model should characterize the system boundary

conditions, along with the complete shaker’s system and dynamic characteristics. 

a. Using CEV models provided by NASA/LM, perform performance analysis including the

clipping associated with limitations of the hydraulic shakers force limitations, spherical

coupling force limits, and available hydraulic fluid limits. Also make assessments of MVF

with using both rigid and dynamic CEV model. Assess the capability to react CEV's

overturning moment. 

b. Perform analysis of MVF’s ability to control test articles (e.g., CEV, VTA, etc).

Characterize sensitivity to changes in the CEV test article dynamic properties (i.e. shifts

in frequencies, etc.)

c. Review, evaluate, and provide recommendations with Benham’s design and analysis
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/265.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

including reports, presentations, etc.

2) Provide consulting on assessment of MVF design and operational capability from

October 1, 2009 through September 2010.

3) Support the MVF validation including VTA design, analysis, and manufacturing

drawings.

4) Support development of a test-verified model of MVF including reaction mass,

pedistals, etc, and control system.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Vibration Tasks (MVF) Deliverables:

1. Provide updated shaker component (vibration table, head expander, etc.) modeling

and analyses (as required)

2. Control system modeling and analyses (as required)

3. Monthly activity reports (monthly) 

4. Engineering reports (as required)

5. Model inputs, scripts, codes, etc.

6. VTA manufacturing drawings (as required)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Experienced, high level vibroacoustic engineer(s) with proven experience with spaceflight

hardware who can confidently perform the above stated tasks within the tight schedule

constraints required.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/272.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

Technical Representative: Reed, Brian

Task Number: NNC08E272T - 9

Task Title: Ascent Abort -1 (AA-1) Reaction Control System (RCS) Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

7/22/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Requirement is not going into WISE. The TR is from Code D.

No-Bid by D received on 10/22/2008, ldk

Entered as WISE Task 20081007 on 10/16/2008, kcm

No-Bid by F received on 10/24/2007, ldk

No-Bid by D received on 10/23/2007, ljm

Entered as WISE Task 20071022 on 10/23/2007, ljm

NASA Glenn Research Center is responsible for providing engineering support to various

programs requiring space propulsion expertise. This particular effort is in support of the AA-1

RCS, a cold gas propulsion system that will be used in the second test flight of the Orion launch

abort system.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

This task provides engineering support for the development of the AA-1 RCS. The engineering

support shall include sizing of the system; overall responsibility of the fluid system and electrical

designs; structural dynamics support to plan for, analyze, test, and document compliance with

environmental requirements; and documentation of the system design.

***************Added April 8, 2009************

Support shall be provided for developing a manufacturing plan for the RCS subassemblies. Plans

for assembly and integration of the RCS will shall also be developed. This support will requires

trips to the AA-1 integration site (NASA-Dryden Flight Research Center) and launch site (White

Sands Missile Range).

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/272.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

The contractor shall provide engineering support of the sizing and modeling of the AA-1 RCS

design. The contractor shall maintain and update as necessary, the RCS model provided to the

AA-1 Flight Test Article CAD Model Configuration team. The contractor shall generate design

drawings from the RCS model, necessary for the manufacture and assembly of the RCS.

The contractor shall provide a fluid system design that meets the AA-1 RCS requirements and

applicable standards. The fluid system design shall include a detailed piping flexibility analysis of

the piping system for the combined pressure, thermal, and launch loads. The contractor shall have

overall responsibility for the analysis, qualification, and acceptance testing of the AA-1 RCS

fluid sub-assemblies. The contractor shall represent the fluid system design at the appropriate

technical interchange meetings, design reviews, and interdisciplinary design tiger team meetings,

being responsible for addressing all related action items. The contractor shall provide

documentation of the fluid system design.

The contractor shall provide an electrical design that meets the AA-1 RCS requirements and

applicable standards. The design shall insure that the solenoid-operated valves, pressure

transducers, and thermocouples are compliant with all applicable standards and processes of the

AA-1 project. The electrical design includes the flight electrical harnesses, selection of flight

connectors, coordination of these choices and corresponding connector pin-outs with the AA-1

Avionics Working Group. The contractor shall provide support to specify, design, build,

document, and operate all electrical ground support equipment (EGSE). The EGSE must provide

sufficient functionality to simulate the control authority of the AA-1 flight avionics as well as

provide a telemetry capability of equivalent or better fidelity than the AA-1 avionics telemetry

capability. The contractor shall represent the electrical design at the appropriate technical

interchange meetings, design reviews, and interdisciplinary design tiger team meetings, being

responsible for addressing all related action items. The contractor shall provide documentation of

the electrical design.

**********

(April 8, 2009)Support shall be provided for developing a manufacturing plan for the RCS

subassemblies. Plans for assembly and integration of the RCS will shall also be developed. This

support will require trips to the AA-1 integration site (NASA-Dryden Flight Research Center)

and launch site (White Sands Missile Range).******

The contractor shall analyze the AA-1 RCS design in light of the structural dynamics

environmental requirements listed in FTO-AFT-FTA-023. The contractor shall support the design

team lead engineer in developing a design solution that complies with all environmental

requirements. This includes identifying and analyzing design solution trades that specifically

comply with the combination of dynamic and 

static loads environments. The contractor shall document the final design analysis, including any

appropriate test results, in an engineering memorandum for review by the structural systems

dynamics Designated Lead Engineer. This material shall be developed in time for the Critical

Design Review. All work is to be performed in conjunction with the project office, chief

engineer, lead design team engineer and other team members.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

1) Manufacturing plan & schedule for AA-1 RCS assemblies (October 09)

2) Test and verification plan for fluid, electrical, and structural dynamic requirements (October

09)

3) Fluid system design analysis documentation (December 09)

4) Electrical system design analysis documentation (December 09)

5) Structural dynamic design analysis documentation (December 09)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/272.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

6) Summary slides for critical design review (December 09)

7) Drawing package derived from ProE model of AA-1 RCS (January 10)

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 20

Schedule 60

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Mechanical designer(s) familiar with ProE and manufacturing drawings. 

Engineer(s) proficient with the design of fluid systems for space-flight applications, including

mounting and fastening of the components to the flight structure. 

Engineer(s) proficient with the design of electrical systems for space-flight applications and

electrical ground support equipment. 

Engineer(s) with an understanding of structural systems dynamics engineering principles and

flight requirements compliance. Test and analysis experience with structural dynamics and fluid

systems is desired.

Government Furnished Property

1) A high fidelity transient analysis of the AA-1 RCS system will be provided by NASA

(Thermal System Branch). 

2) Integrated propulsion system and thruster sub-assembly to be led by NASA (Space Propulsion

Branch)

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/285.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

Technical Representative: Meyer, Michael

Task Number: NNC08E285T - 9

Task Title: Chemical Propulsion Research and Advanced Technology Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

NASA’s Exploration Program includes the use of cryogenic propellant propulsion systems

(liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen/liquid methane) to maximize

performance, however, cryogenic propulsion has only been used for “in-space” vehicles

under very limited conditions. In addition, the Lunar Lander descent stage main engine

requires extreme throttleability. These new applications result in technical risk for future

propulsion system development that will be mitigated through research and technology

efforts. The Propulsion and Propellants Branch (RPP) has responsibility for conducting

research and developing new technologies for chemical propulsion rocket engines. This

technology development is part of the risk mitigation strategy and includes conducting

experiments and analyses for components and subsystems. Our current primary project

customer is the Propulsion and Cryogenic Advanced Development Project.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The individuals responsible shall provide research and technology engineering in the

Propulsion and Propellants Branch. Research responsibilities shall include theoretical

analyses, definition of experimental requirements, conceptual design and analysis of

experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and support to define and

advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and Propellants Branch. Over a one

year period, the task will principally address two areas: investigation of the fundamental

physics controlling the performance and stability of combustion in a rocket engine and

the testing of LOX/methane 100 lbf and 5500 lbf thrust rocket engines.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The individuals responsible shall provide research and technology engineering in the

Propulsion and Propellants Branch.

Research responsibilities shall include theoretical analyses, definition of experimental

requirements, design of experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and

program support to define and advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and

Propellants Branch.

Specific Work Elements

*****Updated as of 8/25/09************
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/285.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

A. Rocket Engine Modeling Effort. Contractor shall:

1. Perform steady state performance modeling of various injector and chamber

configurations

2. Support modeling of high frequency instabilities in liquid/liquid rocket engine thrusters

3. Support modeling of damping devices for high frequency instabilities in rocket engine

thrusters

4. Support project reviews as appropriate.

5. Report findings and propose options for mitigation and experimental investigation of

this problem.

*************

B. 100 lbf Thruster Investigation. Contractor shall:

1. Coordinate with GRC and JSC to define a test plan that reconciles the testing goals

for both sea level and altitude testing with the PCAD goals and GRC facility capabilities.

2. Write at Test Requirements Document with approval from GRC and JSC to clearly

articulate the test needs to the facilities staff at the Rocket Lab. This will be needed to

drive out long-lead procurement items as well as any required facility modifications. Sea

level and altitude testing.

3. Develop a data reduction plan for the post-processing of the test data.

4. Support test cell preparation activities through clarification of requirements.

5. Lead sea level testing of 100 lbf thruster in cell 32.

6. Compile both raw and reduced data for reporting.

7. Upon completion of testing, conduct data analysis and write a report documenting the

test activities and results.

8. Support project reviews as appropriate.

9. Keep GRC personnel (Propulsion and Propellants Branch management and GRC PCAD

technical lead) apprised of work being performed.

*****Updated as of 8/25/09************

C. Guide sub-critical methane heat transfer investigation. Contractor shall:

1. Work with GRC PCAD technical lead to coordinate a test plan for sub-critical methane

heat transfer investigation 

2. Develop a data reduction plan for the post-processing of the test data.

3. Guide methane heat transfer heated tube testing.

4. Compile both raw and reduced data for reporting.

5. Upon completion of testing, support data analysis and write a report documenting the

test activities and results.

6. Support project reviews as appropriate.

7. Keep GRC personnel (Propulsion and Propellants Branch management and GRC PCAD

technical lead) apprised of work being performed.

D. Contractor shall provide expert consultation on the physics, modeling and testing of

liquid rocket engines for combustion instability characterization and understanding.

*****Updated as of 8/25/09************

E. Support altitude testing of Aerojet 5500 lb¬f thruster a White Sands Test Facility

1. Support preparations including instrumentation requirements for WSTF 5500 lb¬¬f

thruster 

altitude testing.

2. Lead test matrix design for WSTF 5500 lbf thruster altitude testing.

3. Support data reduction as necessary for 5500 lbf thruster altitude testing.

*************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/285.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:29 AM]

******Updated as of August 26, 2009 *******

Milestones:

1. Initiate altitude testing of 100 lbf LOX/LCH4 thruster at ACS (12/15/09)

2. Complete Phase I altitude performance testing of 100 lbf LOX/LCH4 RCS thruster

(2/30/10)

3. Initiate Heated Tube Facility Phase I methane testing (11/15/09)

Deliverables:

1. Report on flow instability modeling results (12/1/09)

2. Presentation/data review from propellant conditioning system checkout testing

(10/1/09)

3. Present results of sea level performance tests of 100 lbf thruster and preliminary

altitude performance tests of 100 lbf LOX/LCH4 RCS thruster in ACS for Altair TIM

(12/15/09)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.)

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 20

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

The desired skills include senior research engineering experience in chemical rocket

propulsion test and analysis including thrust chamber cooling physics, operation of the

GRC heated tube facility, and internationally recognized expertise in rocket combustion

instability.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/292.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

Technical Representative: Meyer, Michael

Task Number: NNC08E292T - 7

Task Title: Advanced Cryogenic Propellant Engine System Testing and Modeling

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Advanced chemical propulsion concepts could significantly enhance cargo delivery and

even crewed missions to the moon or Mars. The reduction in the masses of on-board

propulsion for landing or ascent vehicles or for reaction control systems could

significantly impact later missions in the return to the Moon and mission to Mars. In

particular, NASA’s Propulsion and Cryogenics Advanced Development (PCAD) project is

investigating reliable high-performance liquid oxygen (LOX)/liquid methane propulsion

systems for the lunar lander ascent stage, and LOX/liquid hydrogen for several stages of

the lunar exploration architecture. 

Experimental testing is planned at Aerojet Sacramento and the White Sands Test Facility

(WSTF) for Reaction Control System (RCS) and main engine thrust class engines

operating with high area ratio (HAR) nozzles. The goal of this testing is to collect data on

nozzle performance in order to develop a realistic expectation of the kinetic losses

associated with HAR nozzles when used with an oxygen/methane propellant

combination. Additional RCS testing with this propellant combination is planned at GRC.

The modeling capability in this task is intended to be complimentary to the experimental

efforts. Predictions should be made prior to the start of testing and the model should be

anchored/reconciled upon completion of the testing. Further, support of RCS thruster

and Advanced Main Engine (AME) testing will be required.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The individual(s) responsible shall provide research and technology engineering in the

Propulsion and Propellants Branch. Research responsibilities shall include theoretical

analyses, definition of experimental requirements, conceptual design and analysis of

experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and support to define and

advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and Propellants Branch. The objective

of this research task is to advance chemical rocket engine capabilities through testing

and modeling, specifically advanced, cryogenic propellant rockets for exploration and

science mission applications. In particular, the task will:

1) develop a modeling capability to provide predictions of nozzle performance for

oxygen/methane engines. RCS and AME thrust class engines with High Area Ratio (HAR)

nozzles are of particular interest. 

2) support testing and pre- and post-test analysis of LOX/LCH4 RCS thrusters at the

Glenn Research Center and the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF).
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/292.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

3) Support AME task with analysis and hardware coordination.

4) Support testing and pre- and post- test analysis of AME at Aerojet and WSTF.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The individual(s) responsible shall provide research and technology engineering in the

Propulsion and Propellants Branch. Research responsibilities shall include theoretical

analyses, definition of experimental requirements, conceptual design and analysis of

experiment hardware, reduction and analysis of data, and support to define and

advance technologies advocated by the Propulsion and Propellants Branch. This will

include rocket combustion and nozzle performance modeling with the Two-Dimensional

Kinetics (TDK) code, and support of research testing by 

a. Developing a thorough understanding of past work on this subject, both experimental

and theoretical for LOX/LCH4.

b. Beginning with a known problem, anchor to existing test data (of any propellant

combination).

c. Predicting nozzle losses and performance over a range of engine conditions.

Rocket Combustion and Nozzle Performance Modeling

1. Conduct a literature review of theoretical and experimental work for the LOX/CH4

propellant combination relative to combustion and nozzle performance.

2. Perform TDK runs against known data set (anchor models).

a. Include parametric investigation of various code options for TDK and develop

recommended best approach.

3. Perform TDK runs for RCS class engines, vary Pc, O/F, and area ratio. Identify the

magnitude of the nozzle losses relative to theoretical values.

4. Perform TDK runs for LOX/LCH4 Ascent Main Engine class engines

a. Investigate parametric trends based on options within TDK and options for the

propulsion architecture (model options, propellant inlet conditions, engine operating

conditions).

5. Support weekly GRC PCAD technical team meetings.

GRC RCS thruster test support

1. Perform TDK runs for GRC thruster hardware

a. Simulate sea-level RCS tests to anchor model

b. Predict altitude performance for the test matrix

c. Compare predictions to those of Aerojet and the GRC test data

2. Provide recommendation for instrumentation

3. Provide recommendations for test matrix

4. Support testing and post-test data analysis

White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) AME Testing Support and Analysis 

1. Serve as the lead of the WSTF interface group.

2. Perform TDK runs for the WSTF test hardware

a. Provide preliminary performance assessments

b. Provide recommendation for instrumentation (suggestions on experimental

measurements required to properly anchor model predictions (types of measurements,

locations of sensors, quantity sensors, accuracies required, et cetera))
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/292.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

3. Support atmospheric testing of AME

a. Assess preliminary performance

b. Travel to Aerojet for 2 separate weeks of testing

c. Anchor performance model and reassess altitude performance prediction for AME

4. Travel to WSTF for three separate weeks of test support

5. Perform post-test TDK runs for the WSTF test hardware

a. Re-anchor TDK to the WSTF test data

*****New 8/26/09*******

Support assessment of technology opportunities for Mars Ascent Propulsion

1. Conduct literature review of past MAV propulsion studies.

2. Discuss potential options with aerospace propulsion contractors.

3. Support feasibility assessment of RPP competing for MAV propulsion technology

development.

********

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

1. Complete data comparison and analysis for Aerojet RCS tests (2/13/09)

2. Complete instrumentation and test matrix inputs for GRC RCS testing (3/15/09)

3. Complete preliminary post-test analysis of AME sea-level (Aerojet) tests (9/15/09)

4. Complete preparations (TRR) for WSTF AME altitude tests (11/15/09)

5. Preliminary correlation post-test analysis of GRC thruster tests (2/15/10)

6. Complete post-test analysis of GRC Phase I thruster tests (4/30/10)

7. Preliminary correlation post-test analysis of WSTF AME data (3/31/10)

8. Complete post-test analysis of WSTF AME data (5/30/10)

Deliverables:

1. Presentation on post-test analysis of GRC RCS thruster test (2/15/10)

2. Recommendation document on AME nozzle instrumentation for WSTF testing

(9/15/09)

3. Presentation on predicted WSTF AME performance including post-test analysis of

atmospheric data for Altair review. (12/15/09)

Note Milestones (6) & (8) are included for information only and are not due in Award

Fee period 07.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 20

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/292.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

The desired skills include senior propulsion research engineering experience, both

analytical and experimental. Experience in chemical rocket propulsion and analysis

including the TDK code.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/295.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

Technical Representative: Yuko, James

Task Number: NNC08E295T - 5

Task Title: ORION Service Module Thermal/Fluids Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The ORION Service Module (SM) thermal/fluids IV&V effort requires additional support to

address areas identified by SM Thermal as being required work to be done. These areas

include (Task 1) Thermal Requirements Document Consolidation and Review, and (Task

2) Thermal Modeling Support

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Task 1: SM Thermal Requirements Document Consolidation and Review

Description:

The Thermal Requirements Consolidation task will continue to update the Constellation

(CxP) CRADLE based consolidated thermal requirements database that was developed

for the Orion Preliminary Design Review. This includes CxP level requirements, Orion

requirements, and Integration Requirements and Control Documents to the Orion

Vehicle. The task will verify that the ORION prime contractor, Lockheed Martin (LM), and

their subcontractors are meeting the thermal requirements for the SM in the ORION

program. The task product will be used to support the upcoming the Critical Design

Review (CDR) of the ORION vehicle in February 2011. 

The consolidated requirements document will support the IV&V of LM and their

subcontractors work performed in order to meet the Orion Program requirements. In

addition to consolidating the thermal requirements of the NASA kept CRADLE

requirements database, the task will continue to try and track the differences with the

Lockheed maintained CRADLE requirements database. The LM maintained requirements

databook, “Big Blue”, will be updated 10/2009 and during the CDR analysis cycle. The

task support will include attending technical reviews and design reviews.

TASK 2: SM Thermal Model Support

Description:

The SM Thermal Modeling Support task will provide support for performing IV&V of the
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/295.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

Orion power production/management/storage system in the Service Module. The task

will include running the LM Integrated Thermal Model (ITM) to assess its construction

and modeling accuracy and use the ITM as a base model for running simulations not

being analyzed by LM. In addition, the model will be used as a baseline to run

simulations in support of the needs of the GRC Service Module Power group. Also

included will be support for any power testing and evaluation performed by NASA or LM

and their subcontractors.

The GRC SM Thermal Analysis Team is part of an overall NASA Thermal Analysis Team

which is comprised of members from GRC, JSC, and LaRC. Thermal modeling support for

other Service Module teams and the NASA Thermal analysis team will be defined on an

as needed basis. This will include, but not limited to the running of existing thermal

models developed by LM, ATK and other contractors to provide model Verification,

Validation and Accreditation. Some of the work may be defined by NASA as being direct,

in-line work in support of the design analysis cycles.

Additional support for the task will include reviewing analyses and supporting documents

by LM and their contractors in support of design reviews and the CDR in February 2010

to verify and validate that program requirements are being met. Analyses will be

performed in support of the Design Analysis Cycle 4 and Design Analysis Cycle 5 (DAC-4,

DAC-5) for the Critical Design Review (CDR).

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The Government will provide information necessary for the completion of the Tasks. This

includes getting access to WINDCHILL databases, requirements documents, and

Lockheed Martin Thermal/Fluids analysis documents. The Government will also provide

access to a license for the Thermal Desktop analysis software which is required for the

ORION project. 

The Contractor will provide reviews of ORION requirements documents. This will

continue to be done in an Excel based format and presented to the Government. The

requirements consolidation will also track the differences between the Orion kept

requirements, government, and the LM kept requirements.

The Contractor will provide reviews of LM Design Reference Documents and LM analysis

reports. The reviews should include evaluation of the validity and correctness of the

analysis document the findings. The modeling task will also provide the Government an

assessment of the LM/LM Contractor thermal analysis models. Independent thermal

models may be necessary to be created in order to provide an assessment. The Task

will include participation on weekly SM thermal modeling meetings and supporting

related reviews and technical interchange meetings. A written monthly status report will

be provided to the government.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The following are the milestones and deliverables for this task:

Task 1: SM Thermal Document and Requirements Review

The requirement review portion of the task will continually monitor and update as

necessary the thermal requirements for the SM thermal control system as the TBDs and

TBRs become values. (Monitored monthly at the beginning of each month.)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/295.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

The document of consolidated requirements will continue to evolve through the Fiscal

Year (FY10) to incorporate updates and modifications to make the document more

integrated with CRADLE. (Updated as needed.)

TASK 2: SM Thermal Model Support

The task will complete the NASA lead Integrated Timeline Analysis prior to the DAC-4

point of departure. (10/1/09)

The task will evaluate the completed Thermal Desktop models of the power system and

avionics boxes of the Service Module. (1/1/10)

Analyses with the integrated model will be performed to assess the impact of the

ascent/abort conditions on the power equipment components using the latest

aeroheating data available, (11/30/09)

An assessment of the LM power system thermal analysis will be provided prio to the

CDR Subsystem Design Reviews. (9/1/2010)

The task will support the development of an interface between the Thermal Desktop

model and a Level II power model to integrate the thermal/power model. (4/30/10)

The task will continually assess the LM ITM models as they become available throughout

the CDR design cycle. (on-going through FY10)

The task will incorporate the completed Thermal Desktop models of the power system

and avionics boxes into a system level model of the Service Module. (5/1/09)

The task will provide review of the power generation, storage and distribution system

during the CDR design review process. (9/1/10 – 2/1/11)

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 20

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Thermal and Fluids Engineering background

Government Furnished Property

Access to Government Thermal Desktop License Files for Analysis.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/295.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/324.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

Technical Representative: Wiedenmannott, Ulrich

Task Number: NNC08E324T - 5

Task Title: Systems Engineering - Orion Space Environmental Testing (SET) Program

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

IET has been replaced with SET

SET will continue through FY13. Near term effort required to satisfy needs of upcoming reviews.

*****************************************************

The Orion Space Environmental Testing (SET) program is developing the capability for

qualification tests of the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) hardware in the Space Power Facility

(SPF) at the NASA Plum Brook Station. 

To assist in accomplishing these goals a Vibration Test Capability (VTC) is being built within the

SPF. This includes a sinusoidal vibration system, a random vibration system and an acoustic test

facility. Also, a High Speed Data Acquisition System (HSDAS) is being developed. An

Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) test and Thermal Vacuum (T/V) heat flux test are

also being planned. Significant coordination is required for efficient and organized construction

and commissioning of the facilities and test plan development.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide system engineering support that includes space flight hardware verification, test facilities,

space vehicle testing, and facility development. 

Develop requirements for Thermal-Vacuum Capability and EMI/EMC Environmental Capability.

*********************************************** 

updated 08-13-09 Rick Wiedenmannott

Develop requirements for VTC, HSDAS, FO and VTA to meet needs of project as defined by

NASA LSE(RW).

*******************************************************************

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

1. Develop and manage the requirements for the TV and E3 capabilities for SET.

2. Coordinate with lead engineers to determine requirements.

3. Provide input to requirements documents by developing the TV and E3 SRD.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/324.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

4. Provide input to the Systems Engineering Management Plan as required for the TV and E3

capabilities. 

5. Provide input to ICDs, commissioning plans, verification plans, and validation plans.

6. Support LSE effort to develop products for Design Review 4 (VTC CDR).

7. Organize document structure (tree) for requirements at all levels of the IET program for the E3

and T/V. 

8. Review requirements for SPF, E3 and T/V 

to determine intersystem compatibility, and identify interfaces by performing functional analysis.

Including review of upper level documents for consistency of requirements and flow down of

changes. 

9. Support project reviews and design reviews. 

****************************************

August 13, 2009 Rick Wiedenmannott

- above items also apply to VTC, HSDAS, FO and VTA

- Develop the SET Verification plan and verification data sheets.

- coordinate with NASA leads to insure verification of all requirements are completed per NPR

7123.1A

- Design review 4 has been replaced by numerous ERBs, Control Panel Reviews and other

system level reviews that must be supported.

**********************************************************************

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Specific milestones and deliverables include the following.

1. Misc reports and documents (as required)

2. Monthly progress reports (monthly)

3. Systems requirements document for TV and E3.

4. Verification Plan and Verification Requirements Definition Sheets by end of FY'09

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for

Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 30

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

A senior systems engineer is required having a minimum of fifteen years experience in the

following areas: extensive knowledge and proficiency of Systems Engineering (SE) principles,

space flight hardware verification, test facilities, space vehicle testing, and knowledge of facility

development.

Government Furnished Property

None
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/324.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:30 AM]

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/327.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Technical Representative: Elliott, Frederick

Task Number: NNC08E327T - 5

Task Title: Space Environmental Test (SET) Business Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

************AFP7 Update*******

This project was previously entitled Integrated Environmental Test (IET). Throughout

this task all reference to IET is now Space Environmental Test (SET).

************************************

The GRC Orion Project Office (MX) requires 1) Resources Management support and 2)

Scheduling support for the Space Environmental Test (SET) Project.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide 1) Resources Management support and 2) Scheduling support to the Orion

Space Environmental Test (SET) Project. Primary responsibilities are schedule

development and resource management, including resource planning, monitoring, and

evaluation of project status from a business management point of view, including Earned

Value Management (EVM). Multi-personnel team shall be proactive in working with the

SET Project team members, Civil Servant and Contractors, to develop the required

information/products. Unique knowledge in business management tools such as

Microsoft Project, Primavera, NASA financial systems and the capability to provide

custom financial reports to the Orion Project is required.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The GESS-2 Team shall perform the following for the SET Project:

1) Resources Management support

a) Assist SET Project Management and Scheduler in developing SET Project Budget and

preparing SET Project Program Planning and Budget Execution (PPBE) inputs to Orion

Project Office

b) Prepare Government Fiscal Year Full Cost Phasing Plans of project Commitments,

Obligations, and Costs by WBS and Project Roll Up for GRC and Orion Project Office

submissions – FY start and mid-year updates

c) Track Project Commitments, Obligations, and Costs and prepare monthly reports of

Full Cost Plans versus Actuals, including variance explanations, for reporting to GRC and

Orion Project Office Management

d)Prepare project End of year Estimates
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/327.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

e) Support the review of Vibro-acoustic Test Capability (VTC) Prime Contractor monthly

financial reports (533s and EVM Cost Performance Reports) and provide analysis inputs

to SET Project Management

f) Track status of project Purchase Requests (PRs), including approving project PRs

initiated in the NASA SAP system upon receipt of approval from SET Project

Management.

g) Assist Project Management by preparing other project financial reports as required.

h) Support project earned value management process development and reporting.

2) Schedule support

a) Develop and maintain project Resource Loaded Schedule (RLS) for in-house activities

b) Support the evaluation of the VTC Prime Contractor schedule

c) Develop and maintain project Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) from the in-house

RLS and VTC Prime Contractor Schedule

d) Assist SET Project Management and Resources Manager in developing SET Project

Budget and preparing SET Project Program Planning and Budget Execution (PPBE) inputs

to Orion Project Office utilizing the RLS.

e) Prepare project summary schedules for reporting to GRC and Orion Project Office

Management.

f) Support the review of Vibro-acoustic Test Capability (VTC) Prime Contractor schedule

monthly EVM reports (Cost Performance Reports) and provide analysis inputs to SET

Project Management.

g) Coordinate a bi-weekly SET Project Schedule Status meeting

h) Coordinate with VTC Prime Contractor Business Management personnel as required.

Anticipated Travel: One trip to Houston (JSC) every other month; one trip to Oklahoma

City each quarter.

Training: The contractor may seek training within reasonable cost as long as there is

added value to the government.

If training and/or additional travel is proposed under this task, the cost will be identified

and budgeted into the accompanying cost plan, or an amendment must be issued to

cover the additional task requirements.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include the following:

1. Financial report(s), schedule analysis, and RLS/IMS updates to support SET decisions,

GRC reporting and JSC reporting. (Orion Technical, Cost, & Schedule Reviews and GRC

Code M Reviews) - Monthly

2. Phasing Plans - a) Government Fiscal Year (GFY) start and b) Mid-GFY update

3. Full Cost (procurement & labor) tracking reports - Monthly

4. Development and monthly update of SET RLS / IMS.

5. VTC Schedule evaluation inputs - monthly

6. Schedule and resources inputs for SET Integrated Project Review with Orion Project

Office (JSC) - December 2009

7. SET Project Program Planning and Budget Execution (PPBE) inputs - January/February

2010

8. As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include

any open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/327.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

including any mitigation.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 35

Schedule 35

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Budget Analysis, Schedule Development and analysis, Earned Value Management.

Unique knowledge in business management tools such as Microsoft Project, Primavera,

NASA financial systems and the capability to provide custom financial reports to the

Orion Project is required.

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/329.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Technical Representative: Schubert, Kathleen

Task Number: NNC08E329T - 4

Task Title: Orion Service Module Program Planning & Control Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Due to the formation of the Service Module Project Office/Code MX this task consolidates the

Program Planning, Control, and Data Management functions into one task and creates the task

order description to more accurately reflect the scope of the work to be performed.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Glenn Service Module Project Office requires Program Planning and Control, Integrated

Product Team, and Service Module Panel process support. This work is being split from the

existing Task 144 for cost traceability purposes. Primary responsibilities are resource

management, schedule management, data management, including resource planning, monitoring,

and evaluation of project status from a business management point of view, including EVM. Also

includes coordinating the logistics required to conduct or participate in the following panels in

accordance with program/project configuration and data management requirements:

CEV Project Control Panel (CPCB)

SM IPT Meetings (SMIPT)

SM Control Panel (SMCP)

SM Engineering Panel (SMEP)

SM Technical Cost Schedule Reviews (ITCSR)

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The task consolidates all of the Program Planning and Control and Data Management functions

required to support the Service Module Office. Primary responsibilities are data management,

resource management, including resource planning, monitoring, and evaluation of project status

for both Service Module Non-Prime and Prime efforts from a business management point of

view, including EVM. Also includes coordinating the logistics required to conduct or participate

in the following panels in accordance with program/project configuration and data management

requirements:

CEV Project Control Panel (CPCB)

SM Team Meetings

SM IPT Meetings (SMIPT)

SM Control Panel (SMCP)

SM Technical Cost Schedule Reviews (iTCSR
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/329.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

SM Engineering Panel (SMEP)

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The milestones and deliverables for this period shall include the following:

For the SMPO, coordinate the logistics required to conduct or participate in the following panels

and in accordance with program/project requirements: 

CEV Project Control Panel (CPCB) 

SM IPT Meetings (SMIPT) 

SM Control Panel (SMCP) 

SM Engineering Panel (SMEP) 

SM Technical Cost Schedule Reviews (ITCSR)

For the CEV Project Control Board, assure that the agenda's are distributed to the SM IPT leads

and coordinate SM's participation in required topics that impact Service Module. 

For the SM IPT and SM Team Meetings, participate in the meeting discussions to highlight

upcoming activities such as requests for document review, control board agendas, or calendar

items. Keep track of project actions, status and closure. 

For the SM Control Panel and SM Engineering Panel, coordinate and schedule meetings, agenda

topics, minutes, and records resulting from meetings. 

Provide point of contact for coordinating the review of and response to all Service Module review

of all Change Requests and DRD reviews. 

Monthly financial and schedule report(s) to each of the work-package managers and office

management. Coordinate the internal SM Technical Cost Schedule Reviews monthly including

compilation of the leads inputs for Project Manager's use at other SM project reviews (Code M

CMC and Orion TCSRs).

Generate automated database reports for PR's and other monthly charts on financial and

workforce data as needed.

Coding of financial and schedule data in order to populate EVM reports.

Financial analyst support required for annual Operating Plan submit, Phasing Plans, and

coordination of day to day changes to the plan.

Provide financial and schedule inputs required for Technical, Cost, Schedule Reviews for the

monthly activities that include the PMR, CMC-1, CMC-2, TSCR, and Code M Service Module

reviews.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any 

mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 35
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/329.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Schedule 35

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Budget Analysis, Schedule Analysis, Configuration/Data Management Support

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by NASA

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/332.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Technical Representative: Petters, Dean

Task Number: NNC08E332T - 4

Task Title: Service Module Dynamic Interaction Simulation Test Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

This task is being initiated to extract facility buildup support for the SM DIST from task

112 to provide better technical oversight and to get better financial insight. This is an

existing effort that is already staffed.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The Orion Service Module (SM) Propulsion team has identified the need to conduct a

test to investigate the steady state and transient characteristics of the SM Propulsion

subsystem. The Space Propulsion Branch (DEP) will lead the effort for the test. The test

will be used to improve the models that will be used to independently verify the Orion

SM Propulsion subsystem. This task will provide the following facility and test article

build-up support.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall support completion of the the design and build-up of the SM

Propulsion Dynamic Interaction Simulation Test (DIST) Phase 1 test article.

The contractor shall support the design, procure and assemble the data acquisition

system for the DIST Phase 1 test article

The contractor shall support the series of tests using the DIST Phase 1 test article

The contractor shall support the design of the Phase 2 test article

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

• Ensure the data acquisition and hardware control software is completed in support of

the Phase 1 test (December 2009)

• Identify and procure remaining hardware and instrumentation for Phase 1 (November

2009)

• Identify test needs for phases 2 & 3 (February 2010)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/332.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

2010

• Design Phase 2 test rig, identifying the instrumentation, wiring, tubing, and electrical

needs of the test rig (March 2010)

Monthly Progress Report

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 10

Schedule 45

Cost 45

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Demonstrated expertise in data acquisition and controls

Demonstrated expertise in test design and support, including the following areas of

expertice: electrical systems, test safety, and fluid system design.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/334.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Technical Representative: Clapper, Carolyn

Task Number: NNC08E334T - 3

Task Title: Space Communications and Data Systems – CoNNeCT

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

CoNNeCT is an Agency-wide level Project being managed at GRC and will support future

Space Communication research/projects/missions. This task will support CoNNeCT.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The GRC is responsible for the Agency level Project Management of the CoNNeCT

Project, which is part of the Space Communications and Navigation Technology Program.

The contractor shall provide Management of Electronic Data Resources; Database

design, development and programming; Microsoft Project/Primavera Scheduler support;

and provide resource analyst support to CoNNeCT. *****No changes*****

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide Management of Electronic Data Resources; Database

design, development and programming; Technical assistance for web publication of the

weekly/monthly resources reports; Microsoft Project/Primavera Scheduler support; and

provide resource analyst support to CoNNeCT.

The work to be performed will require personnel as follows:

It is expected that several individuals will perform the task. One or more must have a

background in Budget Analysis. It is also expected that one or more of the individuals

will have the appropriate background with computers, networking, and computer security

to provide adequate support on the ADP portion of this task. 

The GESS Team shall perform the following:

Management of Electronic Resources

-- Assist with the CoNNeCT electronic database and file server.

-- Develop and edit content for the CoNNeCT electronic database.

Database Development 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/334.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

-- Provide services for the design, development and maintenance of an internal, webbased financial information systems database. This database will contain all elements of

Full Cost, by providing plan vs. actual data, workforce and travel reports, broken down

to the WBS level, as well as roll-up reporting.

-- Provide highly experienced database programming effort with knowledge of NASA

financial and budgeting practices, strong knowledge of mainframe to PC electronic data

transfer, and strong knowledge of PC and MAC environments. In addition, knowledge of

the Internet is required to provide programming and posting to Internal Web pages.

-- Work to be performed includes strong knowledge of spreadsheets, databases, and

multi-media presentation software. 

-- Programming will include the development and maintenance of programs and reports

in Microsoft Access, which uses electronic data from official lab systems including SAP,

the official Labor file, and the travel system. 

-- Ad-hoc queries from the financial information systems database will be developed

upon request from the NASA TR. 

Tasks to be Performed: The contractor shall perform tasks in the following major areas:

Contract management and administration, PC financial database programming, monthly

report generation, and Resource Analyst support. Each of these major areas is described

below.

-- Contract Management and Administration: The contractor shall provide the necessary

program management and coordination to accomplish the tasks in this Statement of

Work. The contractor shall develop and deliver documents to the NASA TR on a monthly

basis, which describe the work accomplished on this contract. The contractor shall

provide the staff necessary to accomplish the contract tasks. Deliverables for this

element are listed in the deliverables section.

-- PC Financial Database Applications and Programming: The contractor shall provide

services in the design, development and maintenance of an integration financial

information systems database. This database will contain actual commitment, obligation,

and cost data, budget data, and workforce data broken down by the various projects

with the Programs. Programming will include monthly maintenance of programs and

reports that need adjustment, year-end processing which involves closing all records for

the year and ensuring a proper financial start to the new year, and any new

development requested by the NASA TR in regard to financial data gathering and

reporting from the financial information systems database. Also, as required,

programming shall be done to place the monthly financial data on the Internet.

-- Monthly Report Generation: On a monthly basis, the contractor shall perform financial

close-out activities, verify accuracy of budget and actual financial data and make any

needed corrections, and distribute reports electronically via the Internet. The contractor

shall provide logging, tracking, and coordination of financial data and workforce data as

it relates to the CoNNeCT. This includes providing electronic information to several

different personnel levels: Agency Level Resource Manager, WBS Leads, Project

Managers and Resource Analysts.

-- The contractor shall provide resource analyst support services for the CoNNeCT

Project Agency-level Project and in their work with other customers.

Scheduler

-- Provide services for the development and documentation of Space Flight Schedules for

CoNNeCT. *****No changes*****

The Contractor shall provide general clerical and administrative services for the CoNNeCT
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/334.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Project Office. General clerical services shall include word processing, computer

applications, office organization, and record keeping. General administrative services

shall include the management of logistics, information, and documents associated with

various project control boards and key project life-cycle reviews. Clerical and

administrative services typically may be structured to meet one-time or ongoing

organizational requirements.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Database Programming

1. The NASA TR will receive a monthly technical progress report by the 10th working day

of the contractor's accounting month.

2. Contractor TM will provide any information on potential risks associated with this task

(cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation activities.

Monthly Report Generation

1. Monthly programming to support month end closing of financial and workforce

records will be performed so reports can be delivered.

2. Requests for new reports, additions to on-line reporting system, and other new work

will be reviewed and delivered by stated date for each individual request.

3. Year-end programming and close-out work will be performed on the financial

database to ensure that year-end financial and workforce reports are distributed. This

involves file close-out, updating authority numbers, carry-in calculations, project/task

additions and deletions, and other year end procedures. This will add 14-21 additional

business days to the normal distribution.

4. By the 7th business day of each month, provide the TR: cumulative purchase

requests by current fiscal year, sorted by type; cumulative purchase requests for the

current fiscal year sorted by subtask; labor report down to the WBS level; prior year

uncosted report; travel report; other reports as warranted.

5. By the 10th business day of each month, provide the TR: Plans vs. actuals by

elements of full cost at the UPN level; Grant and SDB. Report; Graphs measuring

performance of plans vs. actuals, by element of full cost, as well as at the total full cost

level.

6. Provide assessments of programmatic Fiscal Year dollar and labor requirements, assist

PA Analyst in developing operating plan, assist in implementing the operating plan,

assess new and/or changing requirements and recommend changes, and support

Program Review.

Microsoft Project/Primavera Scheduler support will be provided for the various projects

within the CoNNeCT.

In addition, The contractor shall provide minimal support in the area of technical writing

and MS PowerPoint presentation assistance as needed.

It is understood that the above deliverable dates for monthly reporting will not be

possible at year-end close of financial books. A delay at year-end of 7-14 business days

is possible.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/334.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:31 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 25

Schedule 50

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Extensive Experience with Microsoft Project, Resource Loaded Schedules, Fast Track,

and Primavera

Extensive Experience with Microsoft Access, SAP, BW

Government Furnished Property

Any unique property resources required for this task deliverables will be provided by

NASA.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

Technical Representative: Santosuosso, George

Task Number: NNC09E347T - 4

Task Title: CoNNeCT WBS 5.0 Payload Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 4/15/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Work previously performed under task 224T.

CoNNeCT is a Communications payload set to launch on JAXA’s HTV-3 launch vehicle

and installed on the ISS/ELC (Express Logistics Carrier). The Flight System and Ground

System will serve as a testbed to conduct communications and network relay

experiments under the STRS (Space Telecommunications Radio Standard) architecture

as well as advance the TRL level of software defined radios.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering support is required in the following disciplines to support the flight payload

develoment activities: Electrical engineering, electrical drafting, Mechanical Design,

Mechanical Drafting, Structural Analysis, Structural Dynamics, and Thermal Engineering.

See below for specifics in each discipline.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Electrical Engineering/Electrical Drafting: 

The Electrical Engineering and Drafting task supports the development of the CoNNeCT

Avionics Enclosure along with data, power, and communications interfaces, interconnects

and cabling design and development.

Specific Tasks

1. Develop the avionics enclosure to house all flight avionics

2. Procure and/or develop avionics cards for payload command and control, data

processing, power distribution, health and status monitoring, experiment control and

radio control

3. Develop detailed part and assembly designs for all GRC developed hardware.

4. Drafting: develop and manage the electrical drawing tree, schematics, wiring

diagrams and drawings.

5. Support radio integration and interfacing through TIMs and telecons

6. Develop documentation identified for major reviews such as PDR and CDR

7. Design and develop electrical GSE such as software development systems, simulators
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

and other support equipment

8. Integrate all procured and custom-built components into the avionics enclosure

9. Conduct functional and performance testing on individual components as well as the

integrated avionics enclosure

10. Support environmental testing of components and the integrated package, including

radiation, thermal, and vibration testing

11. Procure Hardware for the build of both CoNNeCT Flight and Flight Spare Avionics,

cables and harnessing and Electrical Ground Support Equipment (including Ground

Integration Unit). Procurements to be made total approximately 500k and are outlined

in the Flight System Avionics Schedule.

Mechanical Design/Drafting: 

The Mechanical Design and Drafting task supports the overall development of the GRC

hardware and assembly of all subsystems developed by all partners and contractors.

This work will be performed in Pro/Engineer.

Specific Tasks

11. Develop detailed part and assembly designs for all GRC developed hardware.

12. Serve as integrator for developing the overall assembly model of the hardware and

drawing. Establish how integration of the various partners CAD geometry will be done

and how CAD information will be stored in GRC’s Windchill.

13. Develop detail and assembly drawings for GRC responsible hardware. Including

checking and backdrafting for detail drawings. Also serve as focal point for the official

release of the drawings.

14. Drafting management tasks: develop and manage the drawing tree, setup and

manage the models and drawings in GRC’s Windchill and make provisions to provide

PDFs of drawings to other databases, such as E-room, and develop a schedule for

drawing development (schedule should be integrated with project schedule and

disconnects resolved).

15. Provide services to revise drawings per ECOs that are generated, including those

generated against GRC’s partners hardware

16. Provide support to develop CAD “pictures” to support project reviews. Provide

support to team meetings.

Structural Analysis

The Structural Engineer will support the structural concept development and perform all

the required structural analyses of the payload structures, the attachments, and

connections/interfaces. Hardware designed needs to be able to withstand all the loading

conditions which include: launch, thermal temperatures, random vibration, etc. Tasks

shall be completed in meeting the project's milestone schedule as well as meeting its

performance spec’s with respect to structural, thermal, and power/electrical

requirements.

Specific Tasks: 

1. Perform finite element analyses (FEM) of the CoNNect Assembly and all of its

hardware components. 

2. Finite element analysis includes: Modal analysis (frequency and mode shape), stress

analysis for launch loads and thermal loads.

3. Perform fastener analysis per NSTS 08307B

4. Perform brackets and lugs analysis for the attachments.

5. Develop Fracture Control Plan and Fracture Summary Report

6. Support PDR and CDR, and other as needed reviews.

7. Resolve PDR & CDR concerns and close out RFAs.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

Deliverables:

1. Safety Critical Data Package and Stress Report

2. Fracture Control Plan

3. Fracture Control Summary Report

Structural Dynamics

Task Description - Develop and assess loads environment expected during launch. Apply

these loads, according to applicable NASA standards, to components and subcomponents as specified. Ensure that all loads requirements are met. Provide report of

all analyses. Perform a vibroacoustics assessment of components and sub-components

as specified to evaluate if decision to not perform vibroacoustic testing is valid. Provide

report of assessment. Review and assess gimbal contractor vibration testing compliance

with vibration testing requirements. Provide gimbal vibration testing verification report.

Specific Tasks

1. Develop Launch Loads (Quasi-static and Random)

2. Vibroacoustic assessment

3. Verification of Vibration Testing Requirements for Gimbal

Deliverables

1. Launch Loads report

2. Vibroacoustic Assessment report

3. Gimbal Vibration Testing Verification Report

Thermal Engineering

This covers the resources to analyze, design, develop, and test the CoNNeCT Passive

Thermal Control System (PTCS). Thermal analyses for individual components of

subsystems within CoNNeCT will also be conducted as necessary to insure on-orbit

temperature limits are not violated. 

Specific Tasks:

1. Design trades will be conducted to determine which thermal control technique best

satisfies the needs of the CoNNeCT system. Due to power source requirements,

redundant heater/controller systems have been baselined for operational and keep-alive

thermal control systems. The thermal capacities (heaters and MLI) and temperature

limits are determined by analysis during the concept and design phases of the project

followed by procurement of the designated components and assembly of the flight

hardware.

2. The thermal design of the CoNNeCT flight hardware requires that new and existing

on-orbit thermal models be combined to predict on-orbit temperatures of the CoNNeCT

hardware. 

3. Development of thermal models of the ISS, ELC and CoNNeCT payload will be

combined to define the thermal operating environment. 

4. A parametric analysis accounting for environmental, ISS and CoNNeCT operations

variables will be used to define the thermal configuration and operating constraints of

the CoNNeCT flight system. This analysis will be used to show compliance with ISS and

ELC interface requirements and the temperature limits of the CoNNeCT payload. 

5. Analysis of CoNNeCT in the HTV environment(s) and during transfer to the ELC will be

performed to define heater placement and power requirements necessary to maintain

acceptable temperatures using different passive thermal control techniques. These

techniques may include a variety of thermal control finishes, insulation, heat pipes,

louvers, or phase change materials, the selection of which requires a system perspective

as weight, reliability, operations, and cost all contribute to the selection process. 

6. Analysis results necessary to baseline the thermal design will be completed to support

PDR. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

7. Reduced thermal models (GMM and TMM) will be submitted to ISS integration

support. 

8. The thermal models of CoNNeCT will be used to close safety and QA verifications. 

9. Analysis will also support the design and setup of thermal balance and thermal cycle

tests to simulate the on-orbit thermal environment. The purpose of these tests is to

validate thermal model predictions and provide environmental screening of the CoNNeCT

hardware.

Deliverables include:

1. Baseline Thermal Analysis Report, 

2. Presentation materials to support PDR and CDR and response to RID's

3. Thermal verifications, test plans, and reports. 

4) Document Deliverables

Document deliverables held in SE&I Provided Plan to PDR and Plan to CDR.

5) Government Furnished Equipment

a) 3x Software Development Systems

b) 1x Ground Integration Unit

c) 1x Flight Releasable Attachment Mechanism

d) APL Radio

e) JPL Radio

f) GD Radio

g) Integrated Gimbal Assembly

6) Government Furnished Facilities

a) Software Development Lab, B.333

b) Flight Hardware Build Area, B.333

7) Government Contacts

a) CoNNeCT Project Manager

b) CoNNeCT Lead Systems Engineer

c) CoNNeCT Principal Investigator

d) CoNNeCT Payload Manager

e) CoNNeCT Comm Instrument Manager

f) CoNNeCT Payload Manager

g) CoNNeCT Payload Mechanical System Lead

8) Period of Performance

The period of performance for the delivery order is through 6/30/10.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

2) Milestones and Reviews

The contractor shall meet the following milestones and participate in the following

meetings, as needed.

a) Engineering Review Boards 

b) Dry run presentations in preparation for major reviews

c) Weekly Payload Team Meetings

d) Weekly Discipline Team Meetings

e) Monthly Project Team Meetings
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

f) Technical integration meetings and telecons

g) Weekly reporting that will include:

i. Top level technical performance/accomplishments

ii. Near term activities

iii. WBS Comments (Problems/Issues/Risks and Mitigation Strategies

iv. Schedules (to include a Critical Path Schedule)

h) The contractor shall support the major CoNNeCT Design Reviews to include:

i. PDR (Completed - September 2009)

ii. CDR

iii. VRR

iv. PSR

v. Software Requirements Review

vi. Software PDR

vii. Software CDR

viii. Phase 0/1 Flight Safety Review

ix. Phase 2 Flight Safety Review

Deliverables

• Document Deliverables - Document deliverables held in SE&I Provided Plan to PDR and

Plan to CDR.

• Presentation materials to support PDR and CDR and response to RID's

• Safety Critical Data Package and Stress Report including launch loads and vibroacoustic

assessment

• Fracture Control Plan

• Fracture Control Summary Report

• Baseline Thermal Analysis Report 

• Thermal verifications, test plans, and reports.

• Preliminary Design models and drawings

Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 45

Schedule 45

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Flight hardware development, test, and analysis experience is required in all discipline

areas

Government Furnished Property

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/347.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/348.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

Technical Representative: Varga, Denise

Task Number: NNC09E348T - 4

Task Title: Communications, Navigation & Networking Configurable Testbed

(CoNNeCT) - Software Engineering

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

Work previously performed under task 224T. 

The GRC Space Communication Division is supporting the development of Software

Defined Radio (SDR) technology through the Space Communication and Navigation

Office at Headquarters. As part of the TRL progression of this technology, a spaceflight

demonstration is desired. In response, GRC has formed the CoNNeCT (Communications,

Navigation, and Networking reConfigurable Testbed) project to fly on ISS in 2011. This

task is in support of this space flight project.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Develop the Payload Avionics software system for CoNNeCT. The currently identified

manifest opportunity is on HTV3 in 2011.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

TECHNICAL APPROACH: 

The GESS II Team shall perform the following:

The contractor shall work closely with the GRC Communications, Navigation and

Networking reConfigurable Testbed (CoNNeCT) team to provide project support and

engineering services. The team will work with the Software Lead Engineer, the Payload

Lead Engineer, and the CoNNeCT Control Center Lead to develop a Flight Software

System to be delivered to flight hardware for testing and eventual shipment to the

launch facility. Some support may be required throughout hardware and system testing

and prior to launch at the launch site. The GESS II Team shall provide a Flight Software

Lead Engineer to direct the flight team and provide an interface to the project. 

Specific Work Elements:

• Develop the payload avionics software per the requirements in the CoNNeCT Software

Requirements Specification

• Outfit and maintain the software development lab, which is located in Building 333,
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/348.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

Room 302A

• Support the Software Design Review, Physical Configuration Audit/Functional

Configuration Audit and Preship Review for CoNNeCT

• Conduct peer reviews and inspections on work products

• Create detailed schedules and plans for work and supply to Integrated Master

Schedule

• Manage work to the plans

• Develop required documentation per NPR 7150.2 Class C software

• Comply with NPR 7150.2 requirements for Class C software by utilizing GLPR 7150.1

for software development

• Demonstrate compliance via Compliance Matrix (available at software.grc.nasa.gov)

• Support project reviews per Integrated Master Schedule, such as the Critical Design

Review, Test Readiness Review, Pre-Ship Review, etc. The required support may vary

from attendance at review meetings to supply presentation material to presenting at a

review.

• Support Verification & Validation, both at the software and systems level

• Provide test plans and test reports

• Report monthly to Discipline Lead Engineer for Software and Software Lead Engineer

• Provide monthly metrics reports to Software Lead Engineer and DLE for Software

• Perform ongoing Risk Management per the project Risk Management Plan

• Follow configuration management procedures per the Software Configuration

Management Plan

• Install and maintain the software configuration management tool and the bug tracking

tool on a server in the software lab

• Purchase and maintain the VxWorks operating system and tools and maintain in the

software lab

• Develop the IT Security Plan for the software lab

• Maintain the Software Development systems in the software development lab. Keep a

log for each system and record the hardware and software configuration throughout the

life of the project.

• Assist in the build-up of the Ground Integration Unit by supplying software to the unit

and participating in testing as hardware is integrated

• [NEW 8/21/09] Perform build-up of SDS#4 and Hardware simulator with parts

procured during the previous performance period 

• Travel to partner sites, JSC, KSC, or launch site to work interfaces, perform testing,

and participate in Technical Interchange Meetings when necessary

• Develop a training plan including required skills and available classes to teach these

skills

• Provide training to team members, as necessary, to obtain necessary skills

• Maintain training records for team members 

• Respond to requests for information for safety reviews, hazard analyses, and safety

packages

• Provide technical budget and schedule inputs

• Specific to the General Dynamics breadboard:

Review the applicable software documents form General Dynamics regarding the

operation and software for the GD breadboard Software defined radio (SDR). Develop an

application for commanding and receiving telemetry with the GD breadboard using the

1553B interface. Use the commands described by the GD software Interface Control

Description. Develop a similar application for sending and receiving over the data

interface using Spacewire with the ECSS-E-50-12A specification. Demonstrate the

functionality of the breadboard using the command set, including startup, 

Staffing:

Provide personnel, per previously submitted staffing plans under WBS 6.0 (Software),

specifically under 6.2 (Flight Software) and 6.3 (Test Software), who have experience

and knowledge directly related to the development of embedded software for avionics
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/348.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

systems. Experience in the development of embedded flight software is preferred. The

personnel should have experience developing software which runs under a real-time

operating system as well as experience in software engineering processes such as

requirements management, configuration management, verification and validation.

These people will be required to support requirements development, concept definition,

design, coding, verification, validation and acceptance of software that will support the

CoNNeCT payload during operation aboard the ISS. The work will be conducted per the

requirements indicated in NPR 7150.2. 

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

[NEW 8/21/09] Contractor shall plan on travel costs for up to 4 one person trips to JSC

(2), SpaceDev in Louisville, CO (1), and JPL (1) for requirements exchange and

engineering technical discussions during this period. One trip to Japan should be

planned for up to 4 weeks in the 1st quarter FY2011 timeframe. Other travel for

required training should also be costed.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Software Design Review 11/2009 - 12/2009

Project Critical Design Review 12/2009 - 1/2010

Functional Configuration Audit/Physical Configuration Audit, Ongoing

Preship Review, Ongoing

Deliverables:

Updates to Software Development Schedule, Due Weekly

Payload Avionics Software Design Document, Due 10/31/2009 

Payload Avionics Software Test Plan, Due 10/31/2009

Payload Avionics Software Test Procedures, Due 11/31/2009

CDR Inputs, Due 11/30/2009

SWDR Inputs, Due 10/31/2009

Payload Avionics Software Test Report, Ongoing

FCA/PCA Inputs, Due 6/30/2010

Flight Software Delivery to Flight Hardware, Ongoing per Integration & Test schedule

Monthly Progress Reports in the form of the Monthly Metrics Spreadsheet (format to be

supplied)

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 45

Schedule 45

Cost 10

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

VxWorks or other real-time operating system experience

Embedded programming experience
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/348.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

4+ years C++ programming experience

Microsoft Visual Studio experience

Experience with software configuration management tools

Requirements development

Software Architecture and Design

Experience with the following is a plus:

XML 

Networking

Apache Server

Subversion installation and maintenance

Bugzilla installation and maintenance

Government Furnished Property

VxWorks operating system and tools

Software development systems (3 minimum)

E-Room Access

Windchill Access

Server for software repository and toolsets

Software Development Lab (B333, Room 302A)

Safety and Assurance Plans:

CoNNeCT Software Assurance Plan, GRC-CONN-PLAN-0085

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/352.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

Technical Representative: McKissock, David

Task Number: NNC09E352T - 2

Task Title: Service Module Systems Interfaces and Vehicle Integration

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/13/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 11/05/2008, ldk

Entered as WISE Task 20081102 on 11/03/2008, ldk

The technical oversight of the development of the Orion Service Module is being performed by

the GRC. Key roles in this activity is oversight of the service module interfaces and vehicle

integration as part of the SE&I effort.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide interface oversight and vehicle integration functions for the development of the Service

Module per NPR 7123. This includes oversight of subsystem interface development throughout

*NEW*ODAC-4 and ODAC-5 (Orion Design Analysis Cycle). Critical milestones will include

the Orion PDR RID closeouts, DRD updates,Document resubmittals, and DAC 4/5 closeout

ERBs *NEW AF7*

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

*NEW AF7***Government's Estimated Period of Performance is October 1, 2010 to August 31,

2011.***

NEW AF7*

Specific products include but are not limited to:

Requirements Allocation

Subsystem interface definition

Integration planning

Element planning

Subsytem integration

Integration enabling products.

Trade studies.

Special Studies and trades.

*********** New as of AFP6 - April 1, 2009 ***********

The contractor shall provide oversight, systems engineering, and vehicle integration functions for

the GN&C, C&T subsystems, and EMI/EMC issues.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/352.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:32 AM]

This oversight shall include coverage of GN&C and C&T Service Module activities, including

regular meetings, mass tracking, risks and overall service module subsystem impacts resulting

from changes to GN&C or C&T systems. The contractor shall provide weekly status of these

subsystems and participate in weekly SE&I Team meetings.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

The Milestones and deliverables shall consist of the following:

1) Products mentioned above are to be reviewed for completeness and accuracy to support the

Orion system reviews and design processes.

2) Weekly update reports on project status.

As part of the reporting requirements of this task order, the contractor shall included any open

risks associated with this task, including cost, schedule, or technical requirements, including

mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 35

Schedule 35

Cost 30

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Systems engineer with manned space flight experience and proven communication skills.

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/355.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

Technical Representative: Zernic, Michael

Task Number: NNC09E355T - 3

Task Title: Space Network Ground Segment Sustainment System Architecture

Development Support

Task Details

Period of Performance

10/1/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Space Network (SN) Ground Segment Sustainment (SGSS) project is developing a

modernized and enhanced architecture for the SN ground stations at White Sands and

Guam to replace the aging legacy systems used for monitoring, control, scheduling, user

data processing, recording, and other critical functions and an associated set of

engineering specifications.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The SGSS project is led by Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), with Glenn Research

Center (GRC) providing support in the role of architecture development and production

of high-quality architecture description products including Department of Defense

Architecture Framework (DoDAF) diagrams and contributions from model-based systems

engineering. GRC is to assist in the development of context materials that establish:

project scope, functional decompositions describing the reference system architecture

being used to develop the requirements specifications, and accompanying Concept of

Operations products to enhance understanding of the intended system behavior within

its environment

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

To achieve the objectives the GRC SGSS Architecture Team requires a management and

technical liaison to be located at GSFC to serve as the Point of Contact (POC) between

the SGSS and the Architecture Team. This POC liaison shall attend all meetings at GSFC

pertaining to the SGSS project. The POC liaison shall obtain and disseminate the design

and technical information to the Architecture Team and provide review input. The POC

liaison shall provide coordination of activities on the SGSS project between GRC and

GSFC, including:

• Acting as liaison between SGSS and the Architecture Team for DoDAF drawing

production, 

• Facilitating and inspecting conversion of SGSS provided drawings into DoDAF formats

(architecture and ConOps drawings tied to architecture) and CORE/Cradle exchanges,

• Providing oversight and participation in architecture/ConOps/requirements

synchronization efforts, 

• Providing oversight and participation in the linkage activities for the reference
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/355.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

architecture, ConOps, and requirements in Cradle database,

• Attending WebEx meetings with Architecture Team 

• Conducting multiple system reviews through documentation and system review inputs.

• Performing system engineering tasks as required. 

Travel to GRC or other locations as required is expected, not to exceed 6 trips.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Deliverables:

1. Generate necessary graphical representations of architecture and ConOps for SRR

presentation for delivery: March, 2010

2. Provide weekly activity reports in the format provided by SGSS Management until

September 30, 2010

3. Presentation packages through September 30,2010

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 10

Schedule 45

Cost 45

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

None

Government Furnished Property

None

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/372.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

Technical Representative: Main, Leslie

Task Number: NNC09E372T - 1

Task Title: Central Process Systems Engineering in Support of Facilities Division

Task Details

Period of Performance

5/20/2009 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 05/22/2009, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20090519 on 05/20/2009, kcm

To provide engineering services to support Facilities Division in the management Central Process

Systems (CPS) at GRC. The CPS provide specialized utilities to the major test facilities including

the various wind tunnels and test cells at Lewis Field. These utilities include combustion air,

refrigerated air, altitude exhaust, cooling tower water, high voltage and variable frequency

electrical power services.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

The contractor shall provide Controls, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering services to support

System and Project Management of the CPS and collateral equipment critical to the operation of

the CPS. These engineering services emphasize safe, reliable, and timely systems support of the

research (aeronautical and space) missions of GRC.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, supervision, and other items

necessary to perform the management and engineering for systems and project engineering for

modifications to and trouble shooting for the CPS at Lewis Field.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Project designs with drawings, specifications, and preliminary cost estimates. 

Computer programming of standard and proprietary computer programs that support the CPS. 

Monthly Progress Reports

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/372.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 45

Schedule 40

Cost 15

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Mechanical, Controls, and Electrical Engineering with AutoCad capabilities. Computer

programming and troubleshooting education and experience for CPS controls. Engineering staff

able to work in the office and in the field (investigation and troubleshooting of problems at the

various CPS facilities at Lewis Field).

Government Furnished Property

Office space, office furniture or office cubicles, and telephone/internet services at Lewis Field.

Safety and Assurance Plans

Quality Assurance Plan

System Safety Plan
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/378.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

Technical Representative: Shook, Tony

Task Number: NNC09E378T - 2

Task Title: Linear Microphone Array Hardware Development

Task Details

Period of Performance

6/25/2009 - 8/31/2010

Background

Why the project is being pursued

No-Bid by D received on 06/29/2009, kcm

Entered as WISE Task 20090632 on 06/25/2009, kcm

This effort was originally initiated under GESS-2 task 0067 as part of the ORPR hardware

development. There is now the need to build upon the current concept, finalize the

design and analyses and provide test hardware to support the program. Tony Shook has

been the TR for initial ORPR done under T067.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide engineering, design and fabrication procurement services to develop a linear

microphone array to be utilized in the 9x15 SWT in support of the Open Rotor Propeller

Testing

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The team shall perform the following:

Work closely with the researchers in the acoustic branch to develop the current concept

assuring it will meet all the requirements and objectives of the test. Current plan is for

48 microphones @ 16 axial locations in the 9x15 SWT. GRC will provide controls and

technician support for assembly in the tunnel.

********************Added 8/27/09 ************************

- Contractor shall procure microphone hardware and electronics as defined by the GRC

researcher to support test hardware.

- Contractor shall design and fabricate test panels, microphone cover and transportation

and handling cart based on requirements provided by GRC research team. 

*************************************************

Specific Work Elements: 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/378.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

1) Task Management 

a) Manage resources on a day-to-day basis; execute the task; resolve problems and

keep the technical representative informed of all issues. The contractor shall prepare and

forward to the technical representative a monthly progress report defining the month’s

technical progress and the future month’s planned activities.

2) Linear Microphone Array Design and Hardware Development

a) Provide engineering and design support to finalize current concept

b) Provide analyses and engineering support to assure design meets all research and

safety requirements defined by the GRC research team

c) Provide 3D solid modeling and drawing support to fully document the design intent

and allow for hardware fabrication

******Added 8/27/2009******

d) Provide a linear array test panels for testing at B&K labs

e) Provide a transportation and handling cart to move it around

f) Provide a removable cover for the face plate to protect the microphones. 

******************************************

Fabrication and material cost estimates identified in the associated cost plan have been

determined based on the currently defined task requirements in this SOW, historical data

and contractors' past experience for budgetary purposes. Once designs are finalized and

approved by the TR, competitive bids will be obtained as required by the FAR prior to

award.

Desktop office computing hardware, software and support will be charged to task as a

distributed cost.

If travel and/or training is required, the cost has either been budgeted into the

accompanying cost plan, or an amendment will be issued to cover the additional task

requirements.

Government’s Estimated Period of Performance is June 29, 2009 to December 30, 2009

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Milestones:

• Provide test hardware in accordance with project schedule as defined by the GRC

research team

Deliverables:

• Fabrication cost estimates and procured hardware related to task objectives

• 3D solid models and drawings submitted into the required Windchill database to

support identified milestones. 

• Linear Microphone fabricated hardware

************Added 8/27/09 ******************

• Transportation and handling cart

• Test Panels

******************************
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/378.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:33 AM]

• Monthly Progress Report- to include any open risks associated with this task (cost,

schedule, technical requirements), along with any mitigation activities.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 50

Schedule 25

Cost 25

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Personnel knowledgeable with the 9x15 SWT and previous microphone concept

development work to aid in achieving aggressive milestones

Government Furnished Property

Pro/ENGINEER

Windchill

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/379.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Technical Representative: Arida, Wade

Task Number: NNC10E379T - 0

Task Title: Recovery Act, Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig Plenum Redesign

and Fabrication

Task Details

Period of Performance

2/25/2010 - 2/24/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

NASA Glenn Research Center has committed support for specific efforts under the

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Recovery act funds for NASA’s

Fundamental Aero Program (FAP) are being utilized to help design and fabricate

combustor rig improvements to enable testing of advanced low nitrogen oxide (NOX)

injector designs.

The combustor section on a jet engine is housed between the compressor and turbine

section. The combustor houses a fuel injector that injects fuel into the airstream to

increase the air’s temperature and speed. A combustor rig is used to test only the

combustion section of an aircraft’s jet engine. A combustor rig test cell is designed to

simulate the inlet conditions on a combustor by creating the same pressures and

temperatures at the exit of a jet engine’s compressor section. Consequently, the exit of

the combustor rig is designed to simulate the same pressures and higher temperatures

at the combustors exit to the inlet of a jet engine’s turbine section. Combustor rigs can

test various combustor concepts to determine their value long before it would be

designed to fit into an aircraft’s jet engine. America’s air transportation industry is

projected to double in size over the next 20 years. The production of greenhouse gas

emissions generated by aircraft engine exhaust, emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2),

nitrogen oxide (NOX) and water vapor, will increase in proportion with the air

transportation industry. As a result, NASA’s Fundamental Aeronautics Program which is

part of the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) has established goals to

reduce fuel burn in future aircraft, reduced fuel burn correlates to reduced CO2 and NOX

emissions. 

The Subsonic Fixed Wing Project (SFW), which is an element of the FAP, is working

toward developing a complete new suite of integrated multidisciplinary analysis tools to

predict noise, NOX, both takeoff and landing performance and cruise performance for

subsonic aircraft which includes America’s transportation industry. Improved

performance requires more efficient operation at lower and higher aircraft speeds along

with improved aircraft emissions at those speeds.

The Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig (ASCR) located at NASA’s John Glenn Research

Center is a high-pressure, high-temperature combustion rig that simulates combustor

inlet test conditions. The ASCR is equipped to measure both gas emissions and perform

non intrusive laser diagnostic emission testing in a high pressure high temperature

environment that mimics the conditions of high pressure ratio jet engine combustor

section. This unique combustion test rig allows researchers and engine companies to

test sector combustors that will be used in future aircraft engines. Engine companies
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/379.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

with higher pressure ratio jet engines require testing at higher temperature and pressure

conditions (1300°F @ 900-psig). The goal of this task is (1) to take existing “ASCR

Sector Rig Modifications” redesign dated 2003, (2) bring up to current ASME Boiler and

Pressure Vessel Code standards, and (3) fabricate and build new hardware per the

verified design.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering services are being procured to coordinate the redesign and fabrication for

the upgrade of the existing Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig test section plenum

hardware and its supporting water-cooling subsystems. These efforts will ensure the

Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig is compliant with current applicable codes (e.g.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code (BPV) and ASME Piping Code ASME B31.3). The

Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig currently advertises temperature capabilities up to

1300°F at a pressure of 900-psig. Current hardware configuration is limiting operating

temperatures to 1100°F at a pressure of 600-psig. The re-design will increase the

Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig’s testing capabilities to its advertised conditions of

temperatures up to 1300°F non-vitiated (no combustibles) at flow rates ranging from 5

to 50-lb/s and pressures ranging from 30 to 900-psig, which will help research

customers with the development of prediction and analysis tools for reduced uncertainty

in the combustor test article design process. Table 1 displays snapshots of the test rig’s

current configuration and the upgraded configuration.

EXISTING AND REVISED CONFIGURATIONS 

-Existing ASCR Sector Rig Assembly 28470M43A000

Inlet Temperature @ Pressure: 1100°F @ 600-psig 

Flow Conditions: 5 to 50 pound per second 

Operating Pressure: 30 to 900-psig 

Maximum Allowable Working Pressure: 1100-psig 

Combustion Flow Temperature: 3400°F 

Exhaust Flow Temperature: 500°F 

-Revised ASCR Sector Rig Assembly Concept

Inlet Temperature @ Pressure: 1300°F @ 900-psig

Flow Conditions: 5 to 50 pounds per second

Operating Pressure: 30 to 900psig

Maximum Allowable Working Pressure: 1100-psig

Combustion Flow Temperature: 3400°F

Exhaust Flow Temperature: 500°F

TABLE 1. EXISTING VS. REVISED.

The revised configuration will allow the Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig to operate at

higher inlet temperature and pressure. The revised configuration also incorporates a

separate laser section that will enhance test configuration set up and alignments.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

The contractor shall:

1. The contractor shall review the existing redesign and make necessary changes to the

redesign to ensure it complies with all applicable codes within NASA Standard 8719.17
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/379.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Rev. A entitled “NASA Requirements for Ground-Based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized

Systems (PVS)” for the redesign and documentation.

2. The contractor shall review the existing redesign report located within the

Government furnished CD (see Figure 1) and make the necessary changes to alleviate

any open issues. 

3. The contractor shall report to NASA any changes made to the existing redesign

implemented per the direction of items #1 and #2.

4. The contractor shall take inventory of existing hardware configuration peripherals

(e.g. fasteners, gaskets and instrumentation) and supply NASA with all extra peripherals

needed to make the redesign a turnkey product

5. The contractor shall review water system upgrades within the existing redesign, verify

compliance with NASA Standard 8719.17 Rev. A, make changes as needed and supply

NASA with all extra components.

6. The contractor shall ensure fabrication of new hardware per the verified redesign is

ASME Code Stamped. The contractor shall submit a NASA Form DD 250 “Material

Inspection and Receiving Report” (the DD 250 is a multipurpose report utilized by

Government agencies to provide evidence of contract quality assurance, to provide

evidence of Government acceptance, and to provide supporting documentation for

processing payment of contractor invoices). The contractor shall prepare the DD Form

250 in accordance with NASA FAR Supplement 1846.6. An approved DD Form 250,

signed by the NASA Technical Representative, shall serve as an acceptance document of

the task completion. 

7. The contractor shall provide a hazard analysis for the revised Sector Rig assembly.

The Government will:

1. The Government will provide the contractor with the existing redesign for a

replacement plenum test section for the Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig’s sector rig

test stand. The redesign was documented and completed in 2003 before funding ran

out, no hardware was fabricated. The redesign complies with ASME code requirements

for 2003 and may not comply with ASME 2009 code requirements. The existing redesign

is documented on a CD titled “ASCR Sector Rig Modifications EDD Task# 75137,

Drawings and Engineering Reports, February 13, 2003, T. Cressman”. Included on the

disk are 14 drawings that encompass assembly and detailed component drawings for the

task. Along with drawings are word documents and a PowerPoint document that records

existing redesign issues and thermal printouts of the original redesign’s heat and stress

analysis.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

These milestone(s) mark significant components of successful task completion. See Task

Deliverables below for further details on deliverables associated with this task.

Ref. A 

Milestone Description: Completion of Critical Design Review (CDR)

Due Date: 5 months after task award

Completion Criteria: All CDR actions successfully addressed and accepted by

Government. See Deliverable 4.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/379.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Ref. B

Milestone Description: Delivery of Final Design Package

Due Date: 6 months after task award

Completion Criteria: Final Design Report, all drawings, schedule and list of needed

procurements from final design package.

Ref. C

Milestone Description: Submission of inventory Report

Due Date: 3 months after task award

Completion Criteria: Compliance with the Commercial Parts List associated with drawing

number 75137M77A000 “ASCR Split Plenum Sector Rig Assembly”. See Deliverable 3.

Ref. D

Milestone Description: Final delivery of fabricated vessels, additional peripheral hardware

and water subsystem hardware needed

Due Date: 12 months after task award

Completion Criteria: Verification to design and compliance with NASA Standard 8719.17

Rev. A entitled “NASA Requirements for Ground-Based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized

Systems (PVS)”. Approved NASA Form DD 250. See Deliverable 5 & 6.

Task Deliverables

NOTE: The government acknowledges that timely performance may be reliant on

Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) and/or government furnished data.

Ref. 1

Deliverable Description: The Government will provide the contractor with the existing

redesign for a replacement plenum test section for the Advanced Subsonic Combustion

Rig’s sector rig test stand. The existing redesign is documented on a CD titled “ASCR

Sector Rig Modifications EDD Task# 75137, Drawings and Engineering Reports, February

13, 2003, T. Cressman”.

Due Date: Task Order award

Acceptance Criteria: N/A

Responsible Party: GOVERNMENT

Ref. 2

Deliverable Description: Submit a report detailing any necessary changes to the redesign

and/or changes alleviating any open issues.

Due Date: 3 months after Task Order award

Acceptance Criteria: Current compliance with NASA Standard 8719.17 Rev. A entitled

“NASA Requirements for Ground-Based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized Systems (PVS)”

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref. 3

Deliverable Description: Submit an inventory report of existing hardware configuration

peripherals (e.g. fasteners, gaskets and instrumentation) and supply NASA with a list of

all extra peripherals needed to make the redesign a turnkey product

Due Date: 3 months after Task Order award

Acceptance Criteria: Compliance with the Commercial Parts List associated with drawing

number 75137M77A000 “ASCR Split Plenum Sector Rig Assembly” within supplied

CD/Deliverable 1 

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref. 4

Deliverable Description: A complete final design package

Due Date: 30 days after CDR completion

Acceptance Criteria: All CDR findings and actions must be addressed for Government

acceptance.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/379.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Package must include final design report, schematics and hazard analysis.

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref. 5

Deliverable Description: Deliver fabricated vessels and all extra peripherals needed to

make the redesign a turnkey product. 

Due Date: 12 months after Task Order award

Acceptance Criteria: Current compliance with NASA Standard 8719.17 Rev. A entitled

“NASA Requirements for Ground-Based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized Systems (PVS)”

and signed DD 250.

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref. 6

Deliverable Description: Submit all extra components required for water subsystem

upgrades 

Due Date: 12 months after Task Order award

Acceptance Criteria: Signed DD 250

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref. 7

Deliverable Description: Submit Monthly Progress Reports

Due Date: Monthly delivered on the 5th business day of each month for the previous

month

Acceptance Criteria: At a minimum, the contractor shall identify:

a) Technical task status (including design)

b) Percent complete of each deliverable

c) Progress towards meeting delivery dates

d) Task deliverable risks or variances (cost, schedule, technical requirements), and

mitigation activities

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Design Mechanical Engineers and Draftsmen with working knowledge and/or experience

of pressure vessel and piping codes and finite element and heat transfer analysis.

Government Furnished Property

See Task Deliverable Section

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Technical Representative: Hughes, Christopher

Task Number: NNC10E415T - 0

Task Title: Recovery Act - Ultra High Bypass Turbine-Powered Simulator Fan

Model

Task Details

Period of Performance

3/4/2010 - 3/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

NASA Glenn Research Center has committed support for specific efforts under the

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Recovery act funds for

NASA’s Fundamental Aeronautics Program (FAP) are being utilized to design, develop

and test aircraft-engine Ultra High Bypass (UHB) component technology hardware to

support the Subsonic Fixed Wing (SFW) Project research into aircraft and propulsion

integration. The goals of the SFW Project are to reduce the amount of fuel burned by

aircraft today by 33% and reduce the hazardous exhaust gas Nitrogen Oxide, which is

responsible for hurting the Earth’s Ozone Layer, by 70%. Less fuel burned also means

much less Carbon Dioxide, one of the gases responsible for Global Warming, put into the

atmosphere by aircraft engines.

NASA has the capability to test scale models that can simulate an aircraft engine by

itself or while installed on a model aircraft wing in NASA wind tunnel facilities. Some of

these scale models are concepts of the next generation of today’s aircraft engines, called

turbofans. The wind tunnel testing is performed to determine the performance of new

turbofan engine designs and their effect on the aircraft aerodynamic performance. A

special test rig is used to power these model turbofans called a Turbine Powered

Simulator, or TPS. The TPS provides power to a model of a turbofan engine during

testing through a shaft that connects the fan part of the model to the air motor in the

back of the TPS unit. Hot, high pressure air is sent to the air motor part of the TPS to

spin it and the model turbofan through a shaft connecting them both together. The air is

supplied through pipes that come through the model aircraft wing and engine pylon that

the TPS is mounted to. To make sure the TPS is healthy and running smoothly and

safely, there are special temperature sensors, pressure sensors and vibration sensors

connected to the rotating parts inside the TPS. How well the model turbofan is

performing is also measured using pressure and temperature sensors located inside the

turbofan model. 

To enable future propulsion-airframe integration testing of advanced UHB turbofans,

design and fabrication of a representative UHB fan and stators for testing on a TPS will

be performed. And, because of the severe operating conditions the TPS unit endures

during testing, the TPS and support systems require inspection and rebuilding after

every test campaign or before its use in the next test campaign. This means the TPS

unit must be taken apart, the parts looked at with special equipment and techniques, the

worn out parts replaced or rebuilt, instrumentation repaired or replaced, and the TPS

put back together. The lubrication system must have seals, hoses and any broken

sensors replaced. The TPS unit control system must also be inspected and defective

parts replaced. It also requires software upgrades to be able to control the unit correctly
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

for the next test campaign for any special operating test points to be explored. This

work requires specially trained people and special equipment to do all the tasks needed

to make the TPS drive unit operate as it was originally designed by its manufacturer,

Tech Development Inc. (TDI).

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Engineering services are being procured in two separate subtasks. In the first subtask,

the Contractor is being asked to complete the aerodynamic and mechanical design and

fabrication of a new fan and set of stators to fit an existing NASA Turbine Powered

Simulator (TPS) air motor, Model Number 2601 (2601). This fan model will be used to

conduct research on the next generation of Ultra High Bypass Wing Integration

Technology in future wind tunnel tests. The second subtask will focus on the

refurbishment and upgrade of the TPS 2601 and its system components in order to

insure the TPS unit can be operated safely during testing. This effort will involve the

inspection and rebuilding of the parts of the TPS 2601 itself and the oil Lubrication Cart.

The TPS Control Console will have NASA-defined software enhancements installed to

enhance TPS control during testing.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor

and specific tasks to be performed

Subtask 1. Design and Fabrication of New TPS Fan Model

1 (a). Model Design

The Contractor shall:

1. Complete both a Preliminary Design and a Critical Design of the aerodynamic,

mechanical and structural design of a new fan and outlet stators, including any model

flow lines required to complete a calibration of the fan and stators (such as internal

inner and outer flowpath contours and fan exit nozzles). The fan model will be used for

testing with the existing NASA TPS 2601. The fan model will be designed to meet the

aerodynamic, mechanical and structural performance requirements provided by NASA in

Appendix A at the end of this Statement of Work. 

2. Perform an assessment as part of the Preliminary Design to determine the material

required for the fan to enable it to meet the mechanical and structural design

requirements provided by NASA. A fan blade containment feature will not be required for

this fan design.

3. Include an analysis as part of the Preliminary Design to match the new fan

performance requirements to the existing TPS 2601 capability. If previous TPS

experimental data is insufficient to perform the analysis, the Contractor shall be predict

the existing TPS turbine performance with existing turbine design computational

methods. In particular, the turbine drive air pressure and heat required to operate the

proposed fan/stator system at its design condition shall be determined. The results of

this analysis will be used to guide the detailed aerodynamic design of the fan/stator

system. 

4. Conduct a limited evaluation of the existing TPS mechanical analyses provided in the

document TDI TR94-108 entitled “Design Analysis Report of the VHBR Simulator Model

2601 TPS and the BPR 9 Cowl Assembly,” produced under NASA Contract NAS1-4509,

Task 053 with Langley Research Center, and a copy of which will be supplied by NASA,
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

to ensure that the increased temperature will not structurally compromise the TPS

hardware at operating speed.

5. Design an internal flowpath contour for the new fan and stators to allow the fan

model to perform as required. The outer flowpath shall include a bellmouth inlet

adapter, fan case, fan duct, and several fan exit nozzles. The inner flowpath shall include

the spinner, hub, inner fan duct, and inner nozzle. The flowpath hardware shall be

designed to enable a calibration of the fan and stators using the TPS 2601 system. The

Contractor shall utilize as much of the existing TPS flowpath contours and fan model

hardware as possible. 

6. Design the new stators to operate upstream of the existing TPS 2601 air

supply/mounting pylon and fan duct bifurcator pylon (located 180 degrees

circumferentially away from the mounting pylon) to minimize the flow distortion

produced by the two pylons. The stators shall be designed to direct the fan air flow

around the pylons and minimize their impact on the fan/stator system performance. The

Contractor shall establish and document the tradeoffs between aerodynamic

performance and structural safety factors in the stator design process required to

incorporate this minimal flow distortion design feature.

7. Design five fan exit nozzles to investigate the fan performance map. The fan design

points for the additional fan nozzles will be specified by NASA in the design

requirements, given in Appendix A. The Contractor shall be responsible to provide the

flowpath coordinates required for each nozzle as part of the fan model design process to

allow the fan to reach the specific design points. The mechanical design of the new

flowpath component hardware for mounting the hardware to the TPS unit shall meet

exiting TPS 2601 interface requirements as defined by the TPS 2601 manufacturing and

design drawings provided by NASA (See Task Deliverables, Item 1).

8. Design a new fan duct instrumentation rake(s) to measure total pressure and total

temperature behind the stators during testing. The rake shall be dimensioned to fit

within the fan duct at the axial location specified by NASA after the final design of the

other model components has been completed. Up to six rakes shall be required, and

NASA will define the number of rakes prior to CDR. The sensor specifications for the new

rake(s) will be provided in the design requirements document supplied by NASA in

Appendix A. 

9. Include in the Final Design detailed analysis results that demonstrate the new fan and

stators meet the design requirements defined by NASA, and complete manufacturing

drawings and CAD models for all new model hardware. NASA will have final approval of

all final fan model designs, manufacturing drawings and CAD models. 

The Government will:

1. Provide a copy of the document TDI TR94-108.

2. Provide a copy of the manufacturing drawings for TPS 2601 unit.

3. Acquire the necessary design software package licenses and deliver to the Contractor.

1 (b). Model Manufacture 

The Contractor shall:

1. Manufacture the fan and stators per the manufacturing drawings and CAD models

generated as part of the Final Design. 
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

2. Manufacture the bellmouth adapter, spinner, inner and outer fan ducts downstream of

the stators, fan exit nozzles, and instrumentation rakes. 

3. Provide material certifications and certified results of non-destructive

inspection/testing for all material used to fabricate all model hardware. 

4. Statically balance the model rotating assembly, which includes the hub, spinner and

fan.

5. Assemble all model hardware and instrumentation onto the TPS 2601 to insure proper

fit and assembly. 

Subtask 2. Upgrade of Existing NASA-owned TDI 2601 TPS Unit and System

Components 

2 (a). Refurbish TPS 2601 Unit 

The Contractor shall:

1. Disassemble and inspect the existing TPS 2601, replace existing bearings and seals,

and reassemble the unit. All TPS components shall be inspected for cracks and stress

anomalies using standard NDE test techniques. 

2. Hydrostatically test the turbine inlet plenum (TDI drawing # 25201) exposed to the

high pressure, high temperature air supplied to the TPS drive turbine to the limits

defined by NASA in the design requirements document. If during the fan design process

it is determined that the new predicted maximum operating pressure will be different

than defined by NASA in the design requirements document, the Contractor shall request

NASA to change the hydrostatic test limit be based on the new fan final design

performance result.

The Government will:

1. Deliver the NASA-owned TPS 2601 turbine unit to the Contractor.

2 (b). Refurbish Lubrication Cart

The Contractor shall:

1. Inspect the oil Lubrication Cart for the TPS 2601 and repair and replace as necessary

components of the cart to attain the original manufacturer defined operating

configuration and performance specifications. 

2. Review the Lubrication Cart operating history document provided by NASA and

investigate and resolve the problems and issues listed. 

The Government will:

1. Provide the Contractor with documentation of the operating history of the Lubrication

Cart and its known operating problems and issues (See Appendix B).

2. Deliver the NASA-owned TPS Lubrication Cart to the Contractor
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

2 (c). Upgrade TPS Electronic Control Console 

The Contractor shall:

1. Review the TPS Control Console upgrade requirements document provided by NASA

and design and implement changes to the Control Console to achieve those

requirements. The enhancements will provide increased safety monitoring and improved

control shutdown functions. The Contractor shall be required to demonstrate the

enhanced functionality of the TPS Control Console during the operational verification

testing outlined in section 2(a) above.

The Government will:

1. Provide the Contractor with documentation of the operating history of the Control

Console and its known operating problems and issues (See Appendix C).

2. Provide the Contractor with documentation of Control Console upgrade requirements

and specifications (See Appendix C).

3. 

4. Deliver the NASA-owned TPS Control Console to the Contractor

2 (d). Demonstrate Fan Model Operating Characteristics

The Contractor shall:

1. Demonstrate the operational characteristics of the new fan model and refurbished

TPS 2601 and support systems at the Contractor’s facility to verify the fan model and

TPS unit performance and safety of operation. The Contractor shall provide all required

resources and test equipment to operate the TPS unit and fan model during testing. 

2. Operate the fan model and TPS unit to the limit specified in the design requirements

document provided by NASA in Appendix A. 

3. Acquire and provide to NASA all test data measured from all instrumentation during

verification testing of the TPS unit and new fan model. 

2 (e). Update TPS System Operating Manual

The Contractor shall:

1. Prepare an updated manual for the TPS unit and its support systems. The updated

manual shall include operating and maintenance information on the updated TPS unit,

TPS Control Console, and Lubrication Cart.

The Government will:

1. Provide the Contractor with a copy of the existing TPS 2601 operating manual.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

These milestone(s) mark significant components of successful task completion. See Task

Deliverables below for further details on deliverables associated with this task.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

Ref: A

Milestone Description : Complete Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

Due Date: Five (5) months after Task Award

Completion Criteria: All PDR actions successfully addressed and accepted by the

Government. See Deliverables Item 2

Ref: B

Milestone Description : Complete Critical Design Review (CDR)

Due Date: Eight (8) months after Task Award

Completion Criteria: All CDR actions successfully addressed and accepted by

Government. See Deliverable Item 3.

Ref: C

Milestone Description : Complete fabrication of Fan Model components

Due Date: Eleven (11) months after Task Award

Completion Criteria: Fan Model components meet drawing specifications approved by

Government. See Deliverable Item 4.

Ref: D

Milestone Description : Complete acceptance testing of Fan Model, and TPS unit and

support system components

Due Date: Twelve (12) months after Task Award

Completion Criteria: Fan Model and TPS system performance meets Government design

requirements. See Deliverable Item 1.

Ref: E

Milestone Description : Complete Final Design Package

Due Date: Thirteen (13) months after Task Award

Completion Criteria: Final Design Report including all predicted results, and all final

drawings and computer models. See Deliverable 6.

Task Deliverables

NOTE: The government acknowledges that timely performance may be reliant on

Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) and/or Government furnished data.

Ref: 1

Deliverable Description: 

a) Documentation defining the aerodynamic, mechanical and structural design

requirements for the new fan model components and design requirements for TPS

Control Console Upgrade

b) Manufacturing and design drawings, computer design models, TDI design report

TR94-108, and Operating Manual for NASA-owned TPS Model 2601, and for BPR9 fan

model previously tested in 2008 with same TPS unit

c) Government-owned TPS Model 2601, Lubrication Cart, and Control Console to

Contractor facility

Due Date: Within thirty (30) days of Task Award

Acceptance Criteria: N/A

Responsible Party: GOVERNMENT

Ref: 2

Deliverable Description: Preliminary Design Review package including design, analysis

and material trade-off results, turbine power capabilities and fan design tradeoff results,
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

preliminary layout drawings, and estimates of hardware pricing and delivery schedule. 

Due Date: Four (4) months after Task award

Acceptance Criteria: Government able to schedule Preliminary Design Review (PDR),

10% completion of project

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref: 3

Deliverable Description: Critical Design Review package including all PDR findings, final

aerodynamic, mechanical and structural design parameters of the fan and stators,

analysis and predicted fan and stator performance results, final geometry of the fan

model components including flowpath contour definitions, final layout drawings, and final

hardware pricing and delivery schedule.

Due Date: Seven (7) months after Task Award

Acceptance Criteria: Government able to schedule Critical Design Review, 90% design

completion

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref: 4

Deliverable Description: Final to Government for approval manufacturing drawings of

Fan Model components

Due Date: Nine (9) months after Task Award

Acceptance Criteria: Drawings meet design requirements specified by Government

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref: 5

Deliverable Description: Delivery of Fan Model components, TPS unit Model 2601,

support system components, updated operating manual, and assembled fan model

hardware to Government.

Due Date: Two (2) weeks after completion of acceptance testing

Acceptance Criteria: Government Form DD250 (Material Inspection and Receiving

Report). The DD 250 is a multipurpose report utilized by Government agencies to

provide evidence of contract quality assurance, to provide evidence of Government

acceptance, and to provide supporting documentation for processing payment of

contractor invoices. The Contractor shall prepare the DD Form 250 in accordance with

NASA FAR Supplement 1846.6. An approved DD Form 250, signed by the NASA

Technical Representative, shall serve as an acceptance document

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref: 6

Deliverable Description: Final Design Report submitted for Government approval. 

Due Date: Twelve (12) months after Task award

Acceptance Criteria: Final Design Report shall include all PDR and CDR findings and

actions taken, all design, analysis and tradeoff study results, all fan predicted

performance results, and detailed final manufacturing drawings and computer models of

all Fan Model component hardware.

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

Ref: 7

Deliverable Description: Submit Monthly Progress Reports

Due Date: Delivered on the 5th business day of each month for the previous month

Acceptance Criteria: 

a) Monthly Financial Management Report – The Contractor shall report monthly financial

data using NASA Form 533M and shall ensure the task order’s financial data is

segregated in a separate line item category with the 533 report. Any additional ARRA

financial documents or reports shall be provided according to the ARRA financial

reporting clauses.

b) Technical task status (including design)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

c) Fabrication status

d) Percent complete of each deliverable

e) Progress towards meeting delivery dates

f) Task deliverable risks or variances (cost, schedule or technical requirements), and

mitigation activities

Responsible Party: CONTRACTOR

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any

open risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including

any mitigation activities.

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 40

Schedule 40

Cost 20

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Personnel knowledgeable with the TDI M2601 Turbine Powered Simulator unit and

support systems, as well as wind tunnel facilities and testing, to aid in achieving

aggressive milestones. Personnel should also be familiar with the following engineering

programs/applications: Pro/Engineer, AutoCAD, NASTRAN, ANSYS and Windchill.

Government Furnished Property

ProEngineer, AutoCAD, NASTRAN, ANSYS and Windchill design software licenses. See

also section Task Deliverables and Item 1 in corresponding table.

APPENDIX A

TPS Fan Model Design Requirements

The fan and stators and flowpath hardware designs shall meet the following

aerodynamic, mechanical and structural requirements:

1. Fan outside diameter of 10.75" 

2. 18 fan blades, 44 stator blades

3. Fan hub to tip ratio at fan leading edge of 0.31 (Fan hub diameter compatible with

existing TDI 2601 TPS unit)

4. Stator hub to tip ratio at stator trailing edge of 0.45 – 0.47, but current value of 0.50

is acceptable if smaller dimension cannot be achieved (Stator hub diameter compatible

with existing TDI 2601 TPS unit. There may be a constraint on this because of the pylon

attachment stirrup that circles the air motor case at this location)

5. Fan face to core nozzle exit/fan diameter of 1.5

6. Design point freestream conditions of Mach 0.78 and inlet stagnation pressure of 1.5

atmospheres (with NASA approval, the pressure value may be reduced to 1.0

atmosphere if design process reveals a fan design cannot be defined with satisfactory

performance for operating at 1.5 atmospheres).

7. Design fan rotational tip speed of 950 - 1000 feet per second

8. Design fan pressure ratio of 1.3

9. Design fan weight flow of 23.6 pounds per second

10. Structural safety factor of 2.0 on yield strength for rotating components (fan blades,

hub, and spinner)
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

11. 20% speed margin on shaft-critical speed for existing TDI M2601 drive unit

12. Margin of safety to 105% of the fan design speed for the fan mechanical design

13. Hydrostatic testing limits shall be 1.5 times the lesser of either the highest turbine

drive pressure operating pressures observed during the previous testing campaign or on

the predicted operating pressures required for the new fan design. The TPS unit was

designed to run in a wind tunnel facility with a stagnation pressure of 2.18 atmospheres

in the last test campaign, requiring an 1816 psia TPS drive air supply pressure. If during

the design process it is determined that the new predicted maximum operating pressure

for the new fan design is less than the value defined above, then the final value for the

testing limit shall be based on the fan model preliminary design results with concurrence

from NASA.

APPENDIX B

TPS Unit 2601 Lubrication Cart Operating History

1. Intermittent very high oil pressures (over 250 psi) have been observed, suggesting

that there is an obstruction in the oil supply line. Repeated checks confirm no restrictions

in the facility oil supply lines. One possible cause is debris lodged in a small passage in

the TPS drive unit itself, or in the oil lubrication cart. 

2. The original oil flow rate sensor in the unit failed under previous testing and was

replaced using nonstandard fittings and was not calibrated. The Contractor shall remount

the sensor using standard fittings and calibrate the sensor as part of the lubrication cart

refurbishment. 

APPENDIX C

TPS Unit 2601 Control Console and Control System Upgrade Requirements

1. The Contractor shall design and implement a “watchdog” timer circuit in TPS Control

System for integration with Ames 11 foot wind tunnel data system. The watchdog circuit

is a redundant safety feature which monitors the TPS Control System for activity. If

there is no activity from the Control System after a predetermined time interval (perhaps

due to a computer lockup or a loss in power), the watchdog circuit actives and sends a

signal to the facility to shut off the air supply to the TPS unit. The new watchdog circuit

shall replace the existing circuit in the Control System. The circuit shall be normally

closed and fail open (i.e. the circuit opens with loss of power). Technical Point of

Contact for the new TPS Control Console watchdog circuit will be Jon Bader at NASA

Ames Research Center (650-604-1401, Jon.B.Bader@nasa.gov)

2. The existing configuration of the TPS Control Console has the ability to perform data

acquisition, drive air supply regulation, safety monitoring and to control shutdown

functions, for a single TPS unit. The Contractor shall install and make operational

LabView VI to support ‘safety monitoring’ and ‘control shutdown functions’ for

conducting two additional modes of TPS unit operation (note: TPS unit drive air supply

will be independently supplied and regulated. The regulation of drive supply air is not

required for these two additional modes of operation): 1), control a single TPS unit while

monitoring both the primary and secondary health monitoring instrumentation from the

TPS drive unit; or 2), control two TPS units independently and simultaneously using only

the primary health monitoring instrumentation from each unit. The Contractor shall

preserve the existing capability to monitor and control a single TPS unit when

implementing the modifications needed meet the control requirements for two TPS units
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/415.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:34 AM]

outlined above.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/423.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:35 AM]

Technical Representative: Main, Leslie

Task Number: NNC10E423T - 0

Task Title: Central Process Systems (CPS) Operations Engineering

Task Details

Period of Performance

1/4/2010 - 8/31/2011

Background

Why the project is being pursued

The Central Process Systems (CPS), High Voltage Distribution, Altitude Exhaust, Combustion

Air Systems, Cooling Towers, High Pressure Natural Gas, Refrigeration System, Service Air,

Variable Frequency Electrical Distribution System and others, require engineering support to

maintain system reliability, on "on-time" start capabilities, and system operational safety.

Task Order Description

Description of Services to be procured

Provide system software engineering, controls hardware engineering, and day to day field

engineering support of the Central Process Systems operations and controls maintenance.

General Scope of Work

SOW Summary should define respective responsibilities of Government and Contractor and

specific tasks to be performed

Provide software and systems engineering in support of the Central Process Systems operations at

Glenn Research Center, Lewis Field. The engineering staff will support the mission in office

space provided by NASA in Building 143.

Deliverables and Milestones to be met

Examples include: reports, analysis, and audits

Daily software engineering support and troubleshooting.

Reports as required on problems encountered, routine software upgrades, controls systems

engineering and documentation.

Reports as required on field problems, problem resolution, and recommendations for upgrading

the Central Process Systems operations. 

Monthly Progress Reports.

As part of the reporting requirements of this Task Order, the contractor shall include any open

risks associated with this task (cost, schedule, technical requirements) including any mitigation

activities.
View Task Requests

file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/423.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:35 AM]

Criteria to Be Used for Evaluation Weights

Performance 60

Schedule 35

Cost 5

Desired Personnel Skill Sets

Computer programming skills, computer troubleshooting skills, Mechanical and Electrical

engineering experience with fluid (compressible and non-compressible) distribution systems, and

controls systems maintenance experience.

Government Furnished Property

Office space in Building 143.

Safety and Assurance Plans

None Selected.