alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Galtech Semiconductor Materials, Inc., and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garrett Quintana, President and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

|   | Date: 02/27/2007 | By: /s/ *Garrett Quintana* |
|--------|------------------|----------------------------|

|   | Garrett Quintana |
|--------|------------------|

|   | President and Director |
|--------|------------------------|

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1


                     CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

              Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
                ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002,
the quarterly report, I, William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William P. Hales
William P. Hales
President and Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2002
S. 2042

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF BACK PAY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay,

out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

to Mr. Rocco A. Trecosta of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the sum

of $10,000 for compensation for back pay not received as an

employee of the Department of Defense Overseas Dependent Schools

for service performed during the period beginning April 14, 1966,

through June 30, 1975. Payment under this subsection is made

after the transmission of the applicable report of the United States

Court of Federal Claims under section 2509 of title 28, United

States Code.

(b) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this section shall

be construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United

States.

(c) FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment authorized

under subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of

Rocco A. Trecosta against the United States for back pay in connection with his service in the Department of Defense Overseas

Dependent Schools.

(d) LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.—No more

than 10 percent of the payment authorized by this Act may be

paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered

in connection with obtaining such payment, any contract to the

contrary notwithstanding. Any person who violates this subsection
S. 2042—2

shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine

in the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Morrison *v.*Cones.

*Saturday, December*27.

If an administrator be sued for a debt of the intestate, and, after the commencement of the suit, his letters of administration be revoked, he may plead such revocation in bar of the further maintenance of the action.

If such plea be filed before any continuance of the cause, the form, viz., That the plaintiff ought not further, &c., because he (the defendant) says *that since the commencement of the suit,*&c., is proper.

ERROR to the *Hancock*Circuit Court.

Blackford, *J.*

— Joseph *Cones*brought an action of debt against *G-eorge L. Morrison*and *'William Doench,*administrators of the estate of *Edward A. Fanning,*deceased. The suit was founded on a note executed by the intestate.

The declaration was filed on the sixth of *August,*1841. Before any continuance of the suit, to wit, at the *August*term, 1841, of the Court, and on the ISth of *August,*1841, *Morrison*pleaded in bar as follows: That the plaintiff ought not further to maintain the action against him, because he says that since the commencement of the suit, and before this day, to wit, on the 10th of *August,*1841, at, &c., the Probate Court of *Hancock*county revoked and annulled the letters of administration before that time granted by said Probate Court to said *Morrison*of the goods and chattels of *Edward A.*Fanning, deceased; and this he is ready to verify: wherefore he prays judgment if the plaintiff ought further to maintain his action against him. This plea was sworn to by *Morrison,*

General demurrer to the plea, and the demurrer sustained.

Afterwards, *Morrison*made default, and judgment was rendered against him for a certain sum, to be levied of the goods of the intestate, &c.

*594*W. J. Peaslee, J. Morrison,*and *8. Major,*for the plaintiff.

This judgment is erroneous. If a person sued as administrator of an estate be not such administrator, he may plead in bar of the action that he is not administrator. 2 Phill. Ev. 363. So, in the case before us, after the revocation of the letters of administration, *Morrison*being no longer administrator of *Fanning’s*estate, might plead the fact of such revocation in bar of the further maintenance of the action.

The plea being filed' before any continuance of the suit, the form, viz., That the plaintiff ought not further, &c., because he_(the defendant) says *that since the commencement of the suit,*&c., is proper.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE RODRIGUEZ; GREG

MIERA; STEVEN J. DURAN; ROSE

MARIE NEAL, on behalf of themselves

and other present and former city

employees,

 Petitioners,

v.

CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE,

 Respondent.

 

No. 10-503

 (D.C. No. 1:07-CV-00901-JB-ACT)

ORDER

Before TACHA, BRISCOE, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on “Plaintiffs’ Cross-Petition for Permission to

Appeal” filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. 

In Case No. 10-500, we granted the defendant City of Albuquerque’s petition seeking

permission to appeal an order certified for interlocutory appeal by the U.S. District Court

for the District of New Mexico in No. 07-CV-901-JB-ACT. In this case, the plaintiffs

seek permission to cross-appeal.

Upon careful consideration of the pleadings, as well as the applicable law, the

petition for permission to cross-appeal is granted. The plaintiffs are granted leave to

Appellate Case: 10-503 Document: 01018363320 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 1
2

cross-appeal the December 4, 2009 order of the United States District Court for the

District of New Mexico, Case No. 07-CV-901-JB-ACT.

Within 14 days of the date of this order, the plaintiffs shall pay to the district court

all required fees. Fed. R. App. P. 5(d)(1)(a).

After the fees have been paid and the district court clerk has complied with Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d)(3), a cross-appeal with a new case number will be

docketed. This court will consolidate this cross-appeal with the appeal that was

authorized in Case No. 10-500.

As with the initial appeal, if the parties have opinions regarding further

consolidation with Nos. 09-2274 and 09-2288, Chavez v. City of Albuquerque after this

appeal and cross-appeal are opened, we encourage the parties to file the appropriate

motion.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER

Clerk of Court

by:

Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-503 Document: 01018363320 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CORNELL BRAND.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 20th 

day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Julio Perez, Jr., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

et al., Appellees

No. 06-14-00065-CV

Trial Court No. 13C1819-005

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Julio Perez, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 21st day of May, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1887

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation 
 on prescribing drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in 
                            group practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2003

   Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Biden) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation 
 on prescribing drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in 
                            group practices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE 30-PATIENT LIMIT FOR GROUP PRACTICES.

    Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 
823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause (iv).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2040 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2040

    To extend the date for the submittal of the final report of the 
  National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, to 
 provide additional funding for the Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2004

Mr. Daschle (for Mr. Lieberman) (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Daschle, 
  Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Corzine, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. 
Durbin, Mr. Dodd, Ms. Collins, Mr. Lott, Mr. Graham of South Carolina, 
and Mr. Hagel) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
            referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the date for the submittal of the final report of the 
  National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, to 
 provide additional funding for the Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON 
              THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Extension.--Section 610(b) of the Intelligence Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-306; 6 U.S.C. 101 note; 116 
Stat. 2413) is amended by striking ``18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``January 10, 2005''.
    (b) Additional Funding.--Section 611 of that Act (6 U.S.C. 101 
note; 116 Stat. 2413) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection (b):
    ``(b) Additional Funding From the National Foreign Intelligence 
Program.--In addition to the amounts made available to the Commission 
under subsection (a), of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 
108-177) and available in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 
2004 (Public Law 108-87) for the National Foreign Intelligence Program, 
not more than $6,000,000 shall be available for transfer to the 
Commission for purposes of the activities of the Commission under this 
title.''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``subsection (a)'' and inserting ``this section''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the report of OneLink, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E.
Eibensteiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I Brian D. Niebur,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ronald E. Eibensteiner




Ronald E. Eibensteiner
Chief Executive Officer
November 3, 2003

/s/ Brian D. Niebur




Brian D. Niebur
Chief Financial Officer
November 3, 2003
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David J. Mickelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: November 10, 2006

                                              BY: /s/  David J. Mickelson
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  David J. Mickelson
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Dale Jarrett Racing Adventure, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the six months ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                 /s/ Timothy B. Shannon
                                 ----------------------
                                 Timothy B. Shannon
                                 Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2005




                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Dale Jarrett Racing Adventure, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the six months ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                 /s/ John Ervin
                                 ----------------------
                                 John Ervin
                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2005
Exhibit
      32.1
 Section 1350
Certification
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China America Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Shaoyin Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of our knowledge:
 
 1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April
      15, 2009
                
                
                
                /
      s/ Shaoyin WangShaoyin
      Wang
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1839 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1839

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2003

   Mr. Smith introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workers Assistance Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY EXTENDED UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 
              ACT OF 2002.

    (a) In General.--Section 208 of the Temporary Extended Unemployment 
Compensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-147; 116 Stat. 30), as amended 
by Public Law 108-1 (117 Stat. 3) and Public Law 108-26 (117 Stat. 
751), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``June 30, 2004'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``June 30, 2004'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``december 31, 
                2003'' and inserting ``june 30, 2004''; and
                    (B) by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``June 30, 2004''; and
            (4) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ``March 31, 2004'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2004''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Temporary Extended 
Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-147; 116 Stat. 
21).
                                 <all>
```