alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ebony Starr B., Also Known as Ebony B. St. Mary's Children and Family Services, Doing Business as Angel Guardian-St. Mary's Children and Family Services, Appellant; Eva B., Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 393]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated January 27, 2004, as, after a fact-finding hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing, to be conducted as expeditiously as possible, in accordance herewith.

In order to terminate parental rights based upon permanent neglect, the appellant was required to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that the mother failed, for a period of more than one year following the date the child came into the appellant’s care, “substantially and continuously or repeatedly to *508maintain contact with or plan for the future of the child, although physically and financially able to do so, notwithstanding the agency’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship” (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). The appellant satisfied its burden of proving permanent neglect by establishing that the mother failed to complete several drug treatment programs and a parenting skills class and failed to maintain regular contact with her child, all of which were a necessary part of the plan for the child’s return, despite the diligent efforts by the appellant to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship *(see Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136 [1984]; *Matter of Chimere C.,*259 AD2d 615 [1999]; *Matter of Stephen Anthony M.,*237 AD2d 363 [1997]; *Matter of Hasson B.,*219 AD2d 649, 650 [1995]; *Matter of Marcel F.,*212 AD2d 705 [1995]). Thus, upon a finding of permanent neglect, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for the dispositional hearing to be conducted as expeditiously as possible, to determine the best interests of the child *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 623, 625 [a]; § 631). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  May 13, 2005 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman,
     President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(LOGO)ARTHUR ANDERSEN

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Management of
Centex Credit Corporation:



We have  examined  management's  assertion  about  Centex  Credit  Corporation's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) (except for minimum servicing  standards I.4, III.3,  III.4, V.3,
and V.4,  which apply only to those  entities  with service  contracts  covering
escrow accounts and therefore are  nonapplicable  to Centex Credit  Corporation)
and that Centex  Credit  Corporation  has in effect a fidelity bond policy and a
$3,000,000  errors and  omissions  policy as of and for the year ended March 31,
2000,  included  in  the  accompanying   management  assertion.   Management  is
responsible  for Centex  Credit  Corporation's  compliance  with  those  minimum
servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on management's  assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,   on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  Centex  Credit  Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on Centex Credit Corporation's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that Centex Credit Corporation complied
with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  and that Centex  Credit
Corporation  had in effect a fidelity  bond policy and a  $3,000,000  errors and
omissions  policy as of and for the year ended March 31, 2000, is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


Dallas, Texas,
May 16, 20000


Arthur Andersen LLP
#### In the Matter of Andre T. McCants, Appellant, v Lucien J. Le Claire, as an Employee of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[786 NYS2d 746]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered July 29, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents denying his grievance.

Petitioner, while an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of a grievance addressing the use of night lights in his cell. Inasmuch as petitioner has been released from prison, his challenge to the denial of his grievance is rendered moot *(see Matter of La Tour v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. Cent. Off. Review Comm.,*5 AD3d 890, 891 [2004]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### Roger Miller et al., Respondents, v Ian Polow, as Cotrustee of Trust for Benefit of Deborah Hari Doniger, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[787 NYS2d 319]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered August 11, 2003, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint as to him as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

An action for an actual fraudulent conveyance under Debtor and Creditor Law § 276 must, like other actions based on fraud, be commenced within six years from the date of the fraud, or within two years after the plaintiff discovered the fraud, or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it, whichever is longer (CPLR 203 [g]; 213 [8]; *see Avalon LLC v Coronet Props.*
      *369
      *Co.,*306 AD2d 62, 63 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 513 [2003]). On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, more than two years before this action was commenced in 2002, plaintiffs had information from which they reasonably could have inferred that the challenged 1993 conveyance by defendant William R. Doniger was made “with actual intent... to hinder, delay, or defraud” (Debtor and Creditor Law § 276) plaintiffs in their efforts to recover money damages from Doniger on a claim litigated in a different action *(see Trepuk v Frank,*44 NY2d 723, 724-725 [1978]; *Erbe v Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.,*3 NY2d 321, 326 [1957]; *Kaufman v Cohen,*307 AD2d 113, 122-123 [2003]; *K & E Trading & Shipping v Radmar Trading Corp.,*174 AD2d 346, 347 [1991]). Since it cannot be said that the instant action is time-barred as a matter of law, the IAS court correctly denied the motion for summary judgment and reserved the issue of the action’s timeliness for determination at trial. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 13-51; RM-11692; DA 14-1362]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ehrenberg, Arizona

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposal rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division dismisses as moot the Petition for Rule 
Making filed by S and H Broadcasting, LLC, proposing the substitution 
for Channel 228C2 for vacant Channel 286C2 at Ehrenberg, Arizona 
because the channel substitution was made in another proceeding, MB 
Docket No. 11-207. The Audio Division also grants the ``hybrid'' 
application for Station KQCM, North Shore, California, File No. BPH-
20120316ABT.

DATES: October 10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12fth 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Report and Order, 
MB Docket No. 13-51, adopted September 18, 2014, and released September 
19, 2014. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating contractors, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 
12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-
378-3160 or via email www.BCPIWEB.com. This document does not contain 
information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. This document is not subject to the 
Congressional Review Act. (The Commission is not required to submit a 
copy of this Report and Order to Government Accountability Office, 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. Section 
801(a)(1)(A) because no rule changes were made).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2014-24113 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Since October 2020, four massive pillar collapses have occurred in limestone 

mines. Each was accompanied by a powerful airblast and the formation of a 

large surface sinkhole. Fortunately they did not result in any injuries. In 2015, 

three miners were seriously injured by an airblast from a fifth pillar collapse. 

All of these collapses involved tall, slender pillars in benched areas. Four were in 

“legacy” areas that had been mined many years ago.

At this seminar, MSHA Technical Support’s Roof Control Division will be 

providing information to raise awareness of these collapse events. They will also 

present ways to assess and mitigate the risks associated with a massive 

collapses in both active workings and legacy areas.

Presentation topics:

1) Overview of recent limestone pillar collapse events

2) Limestone pillar design using the NIOSH S-Pillar program

3) Risk Analysis for limestone pillar collapse

4) Investigation and analysis of airblast risk from pillar collapse

The Seminar will be presented remotely via Microsoft TEAMS.

A certificate for four (4) Professional Development Hours (PDHs) will be 

provided to participants. Please register at least 3 business days prior to 

the seminar to receive the meeting invitation. 

To Register or Questions, email: PillarInitiative@dol.gov

When registering, please provide your full name, 

company or organization, phone number, and the date 

of the seminar you would like to attend. 

For more information, visit www.msha.gov/PillarInitiative 

MSHA MORGANTOWN DISTRICT 

STONE MINE PILLAR COLLAPSE SEMINAR 

November 16, 2021 8:00am - 12:00pm (ET)
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.14

                                    PROMISSORY NOTE

$750,000.00                  San Antonio, Texas              November 30, 1999

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned BEAULIEU RIVER CAPITAL LC, (FORMERLY
WESTON INVESTMENT INTERESTS, L.L.C.), a Nevada limited liability company
(herein called "MAKER", whether one or more), hereby promises to pay to the
order of RACKSPACE, LTD. a Texas limited partnership (herein together with all
subsequent holders hereof called "HOLDER") at its main office in San Antonio,
Bexar County, Texas, or at such other address as the Holder hereof may from
time to time designate in writing to Maker, the principal sum of $750,000.00,
or so much thereof as may be advanced, together with interest on the principal
balance from time to time remaining unpaid from the date of advance until paid
at the rate hereinafter provided. This Note is made in substitution of that
certain Note dated November 30, 1999 between Weston Investement Interest,
L.L.C. as Maker and Rackspace, Ltd. As Holder which provided for a Maturity
Date of January 5, 2000.

I.   MATURITY DATE:

     As used herein, the "MATURITY DATE" for this Note shall be February 18,
2000.

II.  INTEREST RATE:

     Prior to the Maturity Date, interest on the principal balance advanced
and outstanding shall accrue at the rate of eight percent (8.00%) per annum.
Interest on this Note shall be calculated on a daily rate equal to 1/365th of
the annual percentage rate herein provided.

III. PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST:

     This Note shall be due and payable as follows, to-wit:

     Principal and interest shall be due and payable in full on the Maturity
Date.

IV.  PREPAYMENT:

     Maker may prepay the principal of this Note in whole or in part at any
time or times without penalty.
V.   SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:

     The terms and conditions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be
binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

                              (SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF Maker has duly executed this Note as of the day and
year first above written.

<PAGE>


                              MAKER:

                              BEAULIEU RIVER CAPITAL LC

                              /s/ Graham M. Weston
                              -------------------------------
                              By:  Graham M. Weston, Member





                                      PAGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Special Emphasis Panel, Williams Syndrome.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD (Teleconference).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-28079 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

ACTIVIDAD PARA LAS VACACIONES DE INVIERNO:

Modelos del Copo de Nieve del X-59

Los archivos para la plantilla del copo de nieve de papel y corte con máquina de grabado y láser estan disponibles en la 

página 2.

INSTRUCCIONES: (Vea la página 2)

1. Corta alrededor del cuadrado siguiendo la línea punteada1.

2. Doble el cuadrado por la diagonal siguiendo la línea 2. Asegúrese que la parte con el número quede por fuera.

3. Doble el triángulo por la mitad siguiendo la línea 3. Asegúrese de doblarla de forma que el contorno del avión quede 

visible.

4. Doble por la línea 4 asegurándose que el contorno del avión quede visible.

5. Doble por la línea 5, asegurándose que el contorno del avión quede visible. Corte la parte sobrante de la cola.

6. Corte solamente por las líneas punteadas. Tenga cuidado de no cortar en los extremos de las alas.

7. Despliegue cuidadosamente.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Modelos del Copo de Nieve del X-59

ACTIVIDAD PARA LAS VACACIONES DE INVIERNO:

Paso 3. Paso 4. Paso 5.

Paso 5b. Paso 6. Paso 7.

ARCHIVOS PARA MAQUINAS DE TORQUELADO O LÁSER

Seleccione uno de los enlaces proporcionados enseguida. Puede utilizarlos para una máquina de grabado o corte 

por láser.

Outline Files (ZIP)

Contiene un archivo SVG y un archivo BMP

Filled Files (ZIP)

Contiene un archivo SVG y uno BMP
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Malden, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nicholas MaldenNicholas MaldenSenior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and SecretaryJuly 22, 2004
Alliance Techsystems, Inc. Commercial Crew Development Round 2 (CCDev2) Space Act Agreement

NNK11MS06S

ATK CCDev2 Space Act Agreement
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

WILLIAM N. GRIFFIN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

DANIEL A. BRYANT, individually and in 

his capacity as Attorney for the Village of 

Ruidoso, et al., 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 14-2125 

(D.C. No. 2:13-CV-00799-JB-GBW) 

(D. N.M.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

Before BACHARACH, EBEL, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

On September 22, we directed a limited remand to the district court to clarify the 

status of final judgment in this matter. That remand was based on our review of the 

district court docket and the parties’ responses to our September 2 order requiring 

briefing on whether this appeal was from a final order, resolving all claims as to all 

parties. On September 25, the district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order

confirming claims remain pending in that court. 

On September 28, the parties here filed a Joint Motion for Clarification on 

Jurisdiction and Oral Argument. By order issued on September 28, this court vacated the 

previously scheduled oral argument hearing. The appeal is now before us on review of 

the district court’s Order and the parties’ motion as it pertains to the jurisdictional issue. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

September 29, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2125 Document: 01019499091 Date Filed: 09/29/2015 Page: 1 
2 

As we noted in prior orders, the district court’s June 18, 2014 Memorandum 

Opinion and Order granting the Ruidoso defendants summary judgment did not mention 

the Bryant defendants, nor did those parties file a separate summary judgment motion or 

join in the Ruidoso defendants’ motion. Consequently, and as confirmed by the district 

court, claims involving the Bryant defendants remain pending. As a result, the underlying 

order is neither final nor appealable and we lack jurisdiction to consider the appellant’s 

claims. See 28 U.S.C. §1291; Albright v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 59 F.3d 1089, 1092 

(10th Cir. 1995). We therefore grant the parties’ pending motion to the extent it seeks 

confirmation that this court lacks jurisdiction. 

This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and the case is REMANDED 

to the district court for further proceedings. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

Appellate Case: 14-2125 Document: 01019499091 Date Filed: 09/29/2015 Page: 2