alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



QDM INTERNATIONAL INC.

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment
No. 4 to the Annual Report of QDM International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2021,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Huihe Zheng, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Tim Shannon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: May 23, 2022 | By: | /s/ Huihe Zheng                             
|------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                    |     | Huihe Zheng                                 
|                    |     | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                    |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |     |                                             
|Dated: May 23, 2022 | By: | /s/ Tim Shannon                             
|                    |     | Tim Shannon                                 
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                    |     | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
# View of STS-129 MS3 Foreman during EVA2

ISS021-E-030644 (21 Nov. 2009) --- A close look at the helmet visor of astronaut Michael Foreman, STS-129 mission specialist, reveals his crewmate, astronaut Randy Bresnik, capturing the image with an electronic still camera. The two were in the midst of the second scheduled spacewalk for the Atlantis crew members.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-iss021e030644/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 21, 2009ProducerJSCSize1920x1311pxPIA Numberiss021e030644The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 21, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                Worldtex, Inc.
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM WORLDTEX,
INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 9,688
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         51,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                           2,216
<INVENTORY>                                           59,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     122,176
<PP&E>                                               160,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                        46,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       324,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 47,714
<BONDS>                                              197,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 147
<OTHER-SE>                                            66,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       324,403
<SALES>                                              221,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     221,345
<CGS>                                                184,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        184,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    14,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                             578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1,363
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,363
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .10


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1663

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT

To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1663 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BAR2 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 2 maps subtitled ‘‘NC–07P’’, 

4 relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit des5 ignated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear 

6 Unit NC–07P, that are included in the set of maps enti7 tled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to 

8 in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 3503(a)), are hereby replaced by 2 other maps re10 lating to those units entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources 

11 System Cape Fear Unit, NC–07P’’ and dated February 

12 18, 2003. 

13 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

14 shall keep the maps referred to in subsection (a) on file 

15 and available for inspection in accordance with the provi16 sions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

17 (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Passed the Senate November 6, 2003. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### Francis STEWART, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Paul DIPAOLO, Respondent, Appellee.

No. 02-2085.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

July 15, 2003.

Francis Stewart on brief pro se.

Natalie S. Monroe, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

Before CAMPBELL and STAHL, Senior Circuit Judges, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) found that Stewart’s 1960 firearms conviction would have been admissible had Stewart taken the stand. Petitioner Francis Stewart (“Stewart”) argues this conclusion was based on an erroneous factual premise: that he was represented by counsel during the 1960 proceeding. In a federal habeas action, the factual findings of the state court are presumed correct, and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). The 1960 docket sheet shows Stewart did receive appointed counsel. Stewart claims otherwise, but his assertion, standing alone, is insufficient to meet the clear and convincing evidence standard.

*66As for the admissibility of the misdemeanor conviction for operating a motor vehicle under the influence, we agree with the state appellate court’s assessment that admission of the evidence would have been harmless beyond a reasonable doubt under the standard in *Chapman v. California,*386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), given that evidence of four prior felony convictions also would have been available to impeach Stewart. As the trial court planned to admit the evidence in the event Stewart testified, it was clear Stewart only could prevent admission of the evidence by choosing not to testify. Thus, his attorney’s advice to this effect was correct.

Ultimately, then, the advice Stewart received in the course of deciding whether to testify was correct. His ultimate waiver of his right to testify was knowingly made and was valid.

Appellee’s motion to strike is denied.

*Affirmed. See*1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1650 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1650

                  For the relief of Katarina Galovic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2003

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Katarina Galovic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Katarina 
Galovic, the daughter of former Yugoslavian diplomats, shall be held 
and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 
permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 
payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Katarina Galovic as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 1 during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:           March 25, 2011 |  /s/ David Gavagan                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                        |  David Gavagan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                        |  Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Plains Exploration & Production Company



|                                    |  |                             
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Arguello Inc                        |  | Delaware                    
|Nuevo Ghana Inc.                    |  | Delaware                    
|Nuevo International Inc.            |  | Delaware                    
|Nuevo Offshore Company              |  | Delaware                    
|Nuevo Resources Inc.                |  | Delaware                    
|Pacific Interstate Offshore Company |  | California                  
|Plains Resources International Inc. |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Gulf Coast Inc.                 |  | Delaware                    
|Plains Louisiana Inc.               |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Louisiana L.L.C.                |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Permian Inc.                    |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Texas Inc.                      |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Texas Limited Partnership       |  | Texas
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LOUIS AGNES.

July 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
---

---

Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003. Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that:  (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.
Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

(principal executive officer)

/s/ James F. Arneson
James F. ArnesonPresident, Acting Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

|November 14, 2005
|-----------------

26

---

---
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 of Derma
Sciences, Inc. (the "Form 10-QSB") upon my best knowledge and belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  November 14, 2002 | /s/ Edward J.
     QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman,
     President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12360 and #12361]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1944-DR), dated 10/21/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/22/2010 through 10/09/2010.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         10/21/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/20/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/21/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/21/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Buffalo, Clark, Jackson, Juneau, Marathon, Portage, Taylor, Trempealeau, Wood. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 
 
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12360B and for economic injury is 12361B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-27537 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,076,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,258,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                   137,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,749,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,246,032
<PP&E>                                       2,326,541
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,272,413)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,959,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,124,558
<BONDS>                                      2,658,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,727,838
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,959,102
<SALES>                                      5,238,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,238,888
<CGS>                                        3,621,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,838,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (374,884)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

 

RONALD E. FIELDS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

WALGREENS COMPANY,

a/k/a Walgreens Co., 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1129

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-01704-PAB-MJW)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

The court has considered appellant’s response to its show cause order

issued on April 2, 2010 and orders that this appeal be dismissed for lack of

appellate jurisdiction. 

No final, appealable order or judgment has yet been entered by the district

court. Although the district court has granted summary judgment as to plaintiff’s

constructive discharge claim, the remainder of plaintiff’s case remains pending

with the district court and no certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 (b) has been

granted. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See

Atiya v. Salt Lake County, 988 F.2d 1013, 1016 (10th Cir. 1993). This court does

Appellate Case: 10-1129 Document: 01018417692 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 Page: 1 
2

not have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine, see Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949), and it does not appear that any other

exception to the final judgment rule applies. 

When the district court enters a final, appealable judgment, plaintiff may

appeal, if he wishes. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1129 Document: 01018417692 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 Page: 2
9/12/13



10-23-13