alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                         TERMINATION ENDORSEMENT NO. 1
                       attached to and made part of the

                   RETROCESSIONAL AGREEMENT NO. 8DDDR01-C122
                         (HEREINAFTER "ENDORSEMENT")

                                    between

                         AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY,

                   INTER-OCEAN REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., AND

                           ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY,
                          CALFARM INSURANCE COMPANY,
                          ZNAT INSURANCE COMPANY AND
                         ZENITH STAR INSURANCE COMPANY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It is noted and agreed that the Special Endorsement to the Retrocessional
Agreement No. 8DDDR01-C122 effective on August 1, 1998 is cancelled as of
December 31, 1999. This Termination Endorsement becomes effective
concurrently with the effective date of the treaty Endorsement No. 1.

Signed for and on behalf of
INTER-OCEAN REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD.



/s/ Desmond Nash
------------------------------------
SIGNATURE



VICE PRESIDENT                                         12-22-99
------------------------------------             -------------------------------
TITLE                                        DATE

<PAGE>

and for and on behalf of
ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY,
CALFARM INSURANCE COMPANY,
ZNAT INSURANCE COMPANY AND
ZENITH STAR INSURANCE COMPANY


/s/ Jack D. Miller
------------------------------------

Dated this 22nd day of December, 1999
#### DONALD ADAMS v. JOHN GOLDNER.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 156 *N. J. Super.*299)
EXHIBIT 32.2



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Batty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: March 10, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ JOHN BATTY         
|John Batty             
|Chief Financial Officer
#### DOLLEY v. PRICE

No. 255A01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 347

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rasun King, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 899]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 25, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.
#### Aleksandr Naydis, Respondent, v LA Transportation Corp. et al., Appellants.

[789 NYS2d 259]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated February 9, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmation of the defendants’ examining physician failed to “set forth the objective test or tests performed supporting [his] claim that there was no limitation of range of motion,” thus warranting denial of summary judgment on the ground that the defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Black v Robinson,*305 AD2d 438 [2003]; *see also Zavala v DeSantis,*1 AD3d 354 [2003]; *Gamberg v Romeo,*289 AD2d 525 [2001]; *Junco v Ranzi,*288 AD2d 440 [2001]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
NASA Policy on Federal EEO Protections Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Jan. 22, 2020

Background

 In December 2019, NASA’s Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity (ODEO) produced an agency‐wide

training for all employees (deployed on NASA’s Learning Management System SATERN), required biennially by

the No FEAR Act to inform employees and applicants for employment of their rights under Federal anti‐

discrimination and whistleblower laws.

 Because ODEO received a tremendous amount of feedback from users complaining of the length and volume

of the previous No FEAR Act training, deployed in 2017, ODEO significantly streamlined the latest 2019

training.

 In streamlining this current training, ODEO followed the requirements and specific language required by the

No FEAR Act and OPM’s implementing regulations.

 The current training does not reference certain specific types of discrimination the U.S. Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has deemed to be prohibited on the basis of sex, including discrimination

based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

NASA Policy on Anti‐Discrimination Based upon Sex, including Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

• NASA has not changed its policy or position on prohibiting discrimination based upon sexual orientation or

gender identity.

• NASA’s policy continues to prohibit employment discrimination (including harassment) based on sexual

orientation and gender identity, as explicitly stated in the Agency’s current:  NASA EEO Policy Statement;

NASA Policy Directive on Federal EEO Programs; NASA Anti‐Harassment Policy Statement; and NASA

Procedural Requirements on Anti‐Harassment Procedures.

These documents are generally accessible at https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/policy-and-publications.

• The documents are specifically accessible at:

o https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/eeo_policy_statement_tagged.pdf;

o https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/n_pd_3713_002j_main.pdf;
o

o

•

•

•

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/anti‐

harassment_policy_statement_2016_tagged.pdf; and

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/n_pr_3713_0003.pdf.

Additionally, ODEO is currently updating NASA’s EEO and Anti‐Harassment Policy Statements, and these

updated policy statements will continue to specifically include and reference a prohibition on discrimination

(including harassment) based upon sexual orientation and gender identity.

Employees who believe they have been subjected to discrimination or harassment, and wish to raise a

complaint of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, or any other basis protected under

current law, may do so by contacting their Center Equal Opportunity Office (contact information provided at

the ODEO website:  https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/center‐EO‐offices).

Detailed information about the NASA EEO Complaints Process is available at:

https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/complaint‐process
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005, (theReport), I,
William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ William P. Hales
William P. Hales
President and Chief
Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

August 16, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,970-01
EX P ARTE TANYA MA RIE WARRELL MCMILLAN, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR14-150 IN THE 4 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM RUSK

COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of theft and se nte n c e d to f o r ty ye a r s ’ imprisonment. The Six th Court of Appea ls aff

irmed her convicti o n . M

c M illa n v . S ta te , N o . 0 6
- 1 6
- 0 0 2 0 9
- CR ( T e x. App.—Texarkana Aug
. 22, 2017) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant co n t en d s , among other things, that her sentenc e is illega l beca use the prior conviction used as an enhanc ement in this case was an un-re voked, probate d sentenc e from fede ral court. We order that this application be filed and set for submissi on to deter mine (1) whether Ex parte Pue , 5 5 2 S
. W
. 3 d 226 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018), announce d a new rule for purposes of2

retroa ctivity ; (2) if Pue announce d a new rule, whether it is a substantive or proce dural rule; and (3) whether one of the exceptions to the ge nera l rule of retroa ctivity applies. See Teaguev. Lane , 489 U.S. 288, 307 (1989). The parties sha ll brief these issues. Oral a rg ument is not permitted. The trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f App l i ca n t i s indige nt and wants to be re prese nted by counsel, the tria l court shall appoint counse l to repr esent he r. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. Wit hin six ty day s from the date of this order , the trial court shall send to this C ourt a supplementa l transcr ipt containing the order appointing c ounsel or a sta tement that Applicant is not indige nt or does not want to be repr esente d by counsel. All briefs shall be filed with this Court wit hin ninety

day s from the date of this order
.
Filed: Fe bruar

y 12, 2020 Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

## Time and Dates

All meetings are held at 2:30 p.m.:

Monday, November 1;

Tuesday, November 9;

Wednesday, November 10;

Tuesday, November 16;

Wednesday, November 17;

Thursday, November 18;

Tuesday, November 23;

Tuesday, November 30.

# PLACE:

Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington DC 20570.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Pursuant to § 102.139(a) of the Board's Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider “the issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or disposition * * * of particular representation or unfair labor practice proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.”                         *See also*5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Lester A. Heltzer, Executive Secretary, (202) 273-1067.

Dated: November 2, 2010.

Lester A. Heltzer,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28052 Filed 11-2-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892997
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             563,949
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   563,949
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,701,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,268,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,701,816
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,889
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       63,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   244,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (298,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (298,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (298,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Derin Ford, Principal Financial Officer of English Language Learning and
Instruction System, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    April 19, 2005

/s/ Derin Ford
----------------------
Derin Ford
Principal Financial Officer
#### Sutton *v.*Hays.

*Thursday, December*4

In trespass against *A., B.,*and *C.,*the two former appeared to the action, and the writ was returned “ not found” as to *C. Held,*that the plaintiff was entitled tó a continuance in order that process might be *served*on *C.*

ERROR to the *Clark*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This suit was commenced by *Sutton*against *Iiays,*one *Guernsey,,*now deceased, and one *Joseph T. Martin.*It was an action of trespass for an assault and battery and false imprisonment. At the next term after the writ issued, *Hays*and *Guernsey*appeared and pleaded not guilty. The writ being returned “not found” as to *Martin,*the plaintiff 'moved for a continuance that he might have *Martin*before the Court. The' motion was overruled. The cause, as to *Hays*and *Guernsey,*was tried by a jury. Verdict and judgment for the defendants.

We think the plaintiff was entitled to a.continuance. He had brought a joint suit against three defendants, and the writ as to one of them was returned “not found.” The statute gave him the right, after such return, to proceed against the others; but he was not bound so to proceed. The cause should have been.continued, to give the plaintiff an opportunity to have process served on *Martin.*

Dewey, J.,

having been concerned as counsel, was absent.

*544
      *H. P. Thornton,*for the plaintiff.

per *Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
      5, 2010
            
            
            /s/
      Daniel J. DormanName: Daniel
      J. DormanTitle:   President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel J.
      DormanName:
                              Daniel
      J. DormanTitle:
                              President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date:
                              August
      10,
2009





The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
CONNECT

CommunityCommunity

OpennessOpenness

NetworkingNetworking

Needs

Expeditionary Mindset

Countermeasures

TrainingTraining

What can we learn from NASA?

Isolation takes a toll on our health. NASA uses seven key 

points to help astronauts, and us, learn ways to solve 

problems whether in space or at our kitchen table.

Be open-minded: Look for ways to 

adapt to life’s challenges.

Make contacts: Interact with others to create 

new activities and share information. 

Keep a routine: Eat and sleep well, maintain 

physical and emotional health, exercise. 

Confront challenges head on: Seek support 

from and provide support to others. 

Reduce stress: Be mindful of your strengths, 

try journaling and sharing your concerns.

Build on what you’ve learned in life: 

Enhance skills and learn new ones.

Seek ways to support society and 

contribute to the greater good.

www.nasa.gov/hrp NP-2020-05-013-JSC

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration