Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 67615 

1The Commission last amended Appendix D4 

(comparability ranges for instantaneous gas water 

heaters) on August 29, 2007 (72 FR 49948). The 

correct capacity descriptor for instantaneous water 

heaters is maximum flow rate measured in gallons 

per minute, not ‘‘first hour rating’’ as the current 

Rule indicates. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(i) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft 

Certification Office, has the authority to 

approve alternative methods of compliance 

for this AD if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Related Information 

(j) Contact Jeff Janusz, Aerospace Engineer, 

Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 

Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport 

Road, Room 100, Wichita, KS 67209, 

telephone: (316) 946–4148; fax: (316) 946– 

4107, for more information about this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(k) None. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

October 25, 2010. 

Karen M. Grant, 

Acting Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27608 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 305 

[RIN 3084–AB03] 

Appliance Labeling Rule 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is issuing 

technical corrections to the Appliance 

Labeling Rule (16 CFR Part 305). This 

document republishes the text of 

§ 305.20(f) concerning catalog 

requirements not published in the CFR 

and corrects text in Appendix D4 

concerning labels for instantaneous 

water heaters. 

DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Division 

of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer 

Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC 20580 (202–326–2889). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission is republishing § 305.20(f) 

of the Appliance Labeling Rule (16 CFR 

Part 305) which appeared in the Federal 

Register on October 23, 2008 (73 FR 

63066, 63068), but was inadvertently 

not printed in the Code of Federal 

Regulations. In addition, the 

Commission is correcting text in 

Appendix D4 to the change the phrase 

‘‘First Hour Rating’’ to ‘‘Capacity 

(maximum flow rate); gallons per 

minute (gpm).’’ 1

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 305 

Advertising, Energy conservation, 

Household appliances, Labeling, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ For the reasons discussed above, the 

Commission amends part 305 of title 16, 

Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: 

PART 305—RULE CONCERNING 

DISCLOSURES REGARDING ENERGY 

CONSUMPTION AND WATER USE OF 

CERTAIN HOME APPLIANCES AND 

OTHER PRODUCTS REQUIRED 

UNDER THE ENERGY POLICY AND 

CONSERVATION ACT (‘‘APPLIANCE 

LABELING RULE’’) 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 305 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6294. 

■ 2. In § 305.20, paragraph (f) is added 

to read as follows: 

305.20 Paper catalogs and Web sites. 

* * * * * 

(f) Any manufacturer, distributor, 

retailer, or private labeler who 

advertises a covered product that is a 

ceiling fan in a catalog, from which it 

may be purchased, shall disclose clearly 

and conspicuously in such catalog, on 

each page that lists the covered product, 

all the information concerning the 

product required by § 305.13(a)(1). 

■ 3. Appendix D4 is revised to read as 

follows: 

APPENDIX D4 TO PART 305—WATER 

HEATERS—INSTANTANEOUS—GAS 

RANGE INFORMATION

Capacity Range of estimated annual operating costs 

(dollars/year) 

Capacity (maximum flow rate); gallons per minute (gpm) Natural gas ($/year) Propane ($/year) 

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH 

Under 1.00 ....................................................................... 285 285 479 479 

1.00 to 2.00 ...................................................................... 280 285 456 471 

2.01 to 3.00 ...................................................................... 174 268 346 445 

Over 3.00 ......................................................................... 199 290 301 486 

* No data submitted. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27692 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
67616 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau 

27 CFR Part 9 

[Docket No. TTB–2010–0002; T.D. TTB–87; 

Re: Notice No. 104] 

RIN 1513–AB65 

Yamhill-Carlton Viticultural Area 

(2008R–305P) 

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. 

SUMMARY: This Treasury decision 

renames the ‘‘Yamhill-Carlton District’’ 

viticultural area, located in Yamhill and 

Washington Counties, Oregon, as the 

‘‘Yamhill-Carlton’’ viticultural area. We 

designate viticultural areas to allow 

vintners to better describe the origin of 

their wines and to allow consumers to 

better identify wines they may 

purchase. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 3, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N.A. 

Sutton, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., No. 

158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 

415–271–1254. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background on Viticultural Areas 

TTB Authority 

Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol 

Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 

U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary 

of the Treasury to prescribe regulations 

for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, 

and malt beverages. The FAA Act 

requires that these regulations, among 

other things, prohibit consumer 

deception and the use of misleading 

statements on labels, and ensure that 

labels provide the consumer with 

adequate information as to the identity 

and quality of the product. The Alcohol 

and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 

(TTB) administers the regulations 

promulgated under the FAA Act. 

Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 

part 4) allows the establishment of 

definitive viticultural areas and the use 

of their names as appellations of origin 

on wine labels and in wine 

advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the 

list of approved viticultural areas. 

Definition 

Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines 

a viticultural area for American wine as 

a delimited grape-growing region 

distinguishable by geographical 

features, the boundaries of which have 

been recognized and defined in part 9 

of the regulations. These designations 

allow vintners and consumers to 

attribute a given quality, reputation, or 

other characteristic of a wine made from 

grapes grown in an area to its 

geographical origin. The establishment 

of viticultural areas allows vintners to 

describe more accurately the origin of 

their wines to consumers and helps 

consumers to identify wines they may 

purchase. Establishment of a viticultural 

area is neither an approval nor an 

endorsement by TTB of the wine 

produced in that area. 

Requirements 

Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB 

regulations outlines the procedure for 

proposing an American viticultural area 

and provides that any interested party 

may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area. 

Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations 

requires the petition to include— 

• Evidence that the proposed 

viticultural area is locally and/or 

nationally known by the name specified 

in the petition; 

• Historical or current evidence that 

supports setting the boundary of the 

proposed viticultural area as the 

petition specifies; 

• Evidence relating to the 

geographical features, such as climate, 

soils, elevation, and physical features 

that distinguish the proposed 

viticultural area from surrounding areas; 

• A description of the specific 

boundary of the proposed viticultural 

area, based on features found on United 

States Geological Survey (USGS) maps; 

and 

• A copy of the appropriate USGS 

map(s) with the proposed viticultural 

area’s boundary prominently marked. 

Yamhill-Carlton District Viticultural 

Area Background 

In 2002, TTB’s predecessor Agency, 

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 

Firearms, received a petition from Mr. 

Alex Sokol-Blosser, Secretary of the 

North Willamette Valley [American 

Viticultural Area] Group, and Mr. Ken 

Wright, on behalf of certain grape 

growers, to establish a new viticultural 

area called the ‘‘Yamhill-Carlton 

District.’’ Located in northwestern 

Oregon, the Yamhill-Carlton District is 

about 35 miles southwest of Portland, 

Oregon, and 25 miles from the Pacific 

Ocean, in Yamhill and Washington 

Counties, Oregon, and entirely within 

the larger Willamette Valley viticultural 

area (27 CFR 9.90). 

On October 7, 2003, TTB published in 

the Federal Register (68 FR 57845) 

Notice No. 19, proposing the 

establishment of the Yamhill-Carlton 

District viticultural area. In response to 

that notice, the only comment TTB 

received was in support of the proposed 

establishment. On December 9, 2004, 

TTB published in the Federal Register 

(69 FR 71372) Treasury Decision (T.D.) 

TTB–20, establishing the YamhillCarlton District viticultural area (27 CFR 

9.183) as proposed. 

T.D. TTB–20 states that the YamhillCarlton District viticultural area 

boundary line surrounds the towns of 

Yamhill and Carlton, which lie 3 miles 

apart, along Route 47, in Yamhill 

County. The ‘‘Name Evidence’’ section 

states that the first time the two names 

were used together was in the 1853 

establishment of the Yamhill-Carlton 

Pioneer Cemetery. The cemetery is 

identified on the USGS Carlton 

Quadrangle map (published in 1957; 

revised in 1992). The name was used 

again in 1955, when the YamhillCarlton Union High School was 

established in the Yamhill-Carlton 

School District. Residents still use the 

‘‘Yamhill-Carlton’’ name today. 

Petition To Change to the YamhillCarlton District Viticultural Area Name 

In 2008, Mr. Ken Wright, of Ken 

Wright Cellars, submitted a petition to 

TTB to change the name of the 

viticultural area from ‘‘Yamhill-Carlton 

District’’ to ‘‘Yamhill-Carlton.’’ In this 

petition, Mr. Wright asserts that when 

the viticultural area was originally 

proposed ‘‘[t]he inclusion of the word 

‘District’ was completely discretionary 

and added only to enforce the idea of 

the AVA [American viticultural area] 

being a regionalized area.’’ Further, he 

states that ‘‘[h]istorically, the area has 

always been referred to as simply 

‘Yamhill-Carlton.’ Additionally, the 

length of the current name is very 

difficult to fit on a [wine] label. Many 

wineries have found it impossible, given 

their current label graphics, to utilize 

the name.’’ 

Many others joined Mr. Wright, 

writing letters included with the 

petition, in support of renaming the 

Yamhill-Carlton District viticultural 

area as the Yamhill-Carlton viticultural 

area. Kathie Oriet, Mayor of the city of 

Carlton, Oregon, wrote: ‘‘As Mayor of 

the small city of Carlton, I feel the 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES