alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.46
  SINA CORPORATION
2007 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AGREEMENT
 MM DD,
YYYY SINA Corporation Employee AA
  Restricted Share Units XXXX
 Vesting of Restricted Stock Units
 Performance Goals for Performance Period YYYY:
 XX%
 XX%
  Performance Goals for the Performance Period MM DD, YYYY to MM DD, YYYY:




---



##### 



XX%
 XX%
  Performance Goals for the Performance Period MM DD, YYYY to MM DD, YYYY:
 XX%
 XX%
  Termination of Service
 Settlement of Restricted Share Units
 Withholding Taxes
 2




---



##### 



Tax Advice
 Non-Transferability of Restricted Share Units
 Restriction on Transfer
 Share Certificate Restrictive Legends
 Representations, Warranties, Covenants, and Acknowledgments
 Voting and Other Rights
 No Employment Rights
 3




---



##### 



Notices
 Entire Agreement; Enforcement of Rights
 Governing Law
 Arbitration
 Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 4




---



##### 



Counterparts
  (Signature Page Follows)
 5




---



##### 



DD MM,
YYYY
 SINA CORPORATION
 By:
    
    (Signature)Name:Title:
    
    President & CEO
 RECIPIENT:
 Employee AA
 By:
    
    (Signature)Address:
 Telephone
Number:Email Address:
 6
Order entered January 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00519-CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-75173-X

ORDER

Before the Court is Helen Arizor’s first amended motion to withdraw as counsel. 

Attached to the motion is a copy of the trial court’s July 23, 2013 order granting Ms. Arizor’s 

request that she be discharged as counsel for appellant. The order is signed five months after 

Ms. Arizor filed appellant’s notice of appeal and five months before the clerk’s record was filed. 

However, a copy of the order was not included in the clerk’s record, and our records continue to 

reflect appellant is represented by Ms. Arizor. Because the trial court has discharged Ms. Arizor 

as counsel for appellant, we GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove 

Helen Arizor as appellant’s attorney of record.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute this appeal. If the trial court determines appellant does not desire to prosecute this 

appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. If the trial court determines appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel. 
If the trial court determines appellant is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint 

counsel to represent appellant. If the trial court determines appellant is not entitled to appointed 

counsel, the trial court shall then determine whether appellant has retained counsel to represent 

her. We ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of 

this order, the reporter’s record from the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to (1) the Honorable 

Cheryl Lee Shannon, Presiding Judge of the 305th Judicial District Court; (2) Pamela Sumler, 

Official Court Reporter of the 305th Judicial District Court; (3) Helen Arizor; (4) appellant; and 

(5) counsel for appellee. 

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty-five (35) days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is 

received, whichever is earlier. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### MOORE v. N.C. COOP. EXT. SERV.

No. 576P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 89

Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 18 December 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3677

___________

Lisa J. Montague, *

*

 Appellant, *

 v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the 

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Department of the Army, *

Secretary Togo D. West, Jr.; * UNPUBLISHED

Togo D. West, Jr., *

*

 Appellees. *

*

___________

Submitted: May 23, 1997

 Filed: July 31, 1997

___________

Before BEAM, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOKEN,

 Circuit Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

Lisa Montague was a civilian employee of the Army who worked as an

occupational therapist providing services to the disabled children of

United States military personnel stationed in Germany. She brought suit

under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-797b, alleging that

(1) she was constructively discharged from her job; (2) she was retaliated

against by her supervisors for filing complaints with the EEOC and bringing

to the attention of military commanders what she perceived were

inadequacies and illegalities in the treatment of disabled children; and

(3) she was discriminated against because her supervisors thought that her

sympathy for handicapped children was evidence that she suffered from a

mental or emotional disease. 

The case was tried to the district court sitting without a jury. The

court entered judgment against Montague and for the defendants on each

count of her second amended complaint, explaining its decision in a

thorough and well-reasoned opinion. 

Montague now appeals contending that the court erred as a matter of

law with respect to its conclusions on each of the counts of her complaint.

 After a review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the opinion

of the district court, we find that the decision of the district court in

favor of the defendants contains no error of law, that the findings of fact

by the district court are not clearly erroneous, and that an extended

opinion by our court would have no precedential value.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-25298, 333-63034 and 333-91095) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2003, withrespect to the financial statements and schedule of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 27, 2003
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Diagrams 
        are available for the
            following spacecraft.
      MercuryGeminiApollo 
          Salyut 
          Skylab 
          Apollo-Soyuz 
          Test Project Shuttle 
          Mir
      Training 
        and OperationsLong 
        Duration Psychology
                Bilingual 
        Blues
               Earth Observations
      Science
                Photo 
        Gallery
                Video 
        Gallery
                Diagrams
                Patches
                Children's 
        Book
                Documents
                Mir 
        Deorbit Animation
|| TOC | Site 
        Map |Photo Gallery | Video Gallery | Diagrams 
        | Welcome | Search 
        |
DRAFT 

NASA Advisory Council 

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)

Engagement Committee

AGENDA

Oct. 1, 2020, 11:00 am – 4:00 pm ET 

VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY

Webex and Call-In Information Below

11:00 Introduction to Meeting Beverly Girten

11:05 Opening Remarks by Chair Dan Dumbacher

11:10 National STEM Updates

• Federal Coordination (FC) in STEM and COSTEM Update

Mike Kincaid

11:25 Office of STEM Engagement Updates

• Overview

• Impact of Coronavirus

• Accomplishments

• Strategic Outlook

• Program Update

Mike Kincaid

Kris Brown

Elaine Ho

11:45 Artemis K – 12 Efforts Mike Kincaid

12:05 Lunch Break All

12:35 STEM Engagement’s Strategy for Broadening Student Participation Torry Johnson

Elaine Ho

 1:35 Performance and Evaluation: Diversity Update Rick Gilmore

 2:35 Break All

 2:50 Discuss/Finalize Findings and Recommendations

• Refine existing recommendations 

Members

 4:00 Adjourn Meeting Beverly Girten 

FOR COMMITTEE MEMBERS:

For audio, please be sure to use the phone number and participant passcode. Use webex to see the slides.

415-527-5035 or toll access number 929-251-9612 and then the access passcode: 199 338 2435 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx link Is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/onstage/g.php?MTID=e61bb5ede39ff001b74ffe7c0113072ca 

The WebEx meeting number is 199 338 2435 and the password is 3pgDmf7PS@7 (case sensitive)
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Barry Sloane, Chief Executive Officer of Newtek Business Services, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Newtek Business Services, Inc. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any chance in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2008
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of CryptoLogic Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies solely for purposes of 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:    March 16, 2012
/s/ David GavaganDavid GavaganChief Executive Officer




This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 333-145277, No. 333-145276, No. 333-140451, No. 333-132481, No. 333-131016, No. 333-130381,No. 333-125074, No. 333-117007, No. 333-103663, No. 333-61248, No. 333-54976, No. 333-52634,No. 333-47020, No. 333-92619 and No. 333-81492) of SonicWALL, Inc. of our reports dated March 7,2008, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K./s/ ARMANINO McKENNA, LLPSan Ramon, California
#### Florin C. Papa, Also Known as Florin C. Popescu, Plaintiff, v 24 Caryl Avenue Realty Co. et al., Defendants. Community Preservation Corporation, Intervenor; Charles Rudd Mackenzie, Nonparty Appellant; W. Denis Donovan, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 611]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs attorney, Charles Rudd Mackenzie, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 1, 2003, which, after a hearing, held him in criminal contempt of court for his willful violation of an order of the same court dated June 19, 2003, imposed upon him a term of imprisonment of 30 days with the ability to purge upon the deposit of the balance of certain fees and disbursements he received in the sum of $52,073.34 with the Westchester County Treasurer, and imposed a fine in the sum of $250.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence before the Supreme Court was sufficient to find that the appellant willfully disobeyed a lawful mandate of the court, which constituted criminal contempt *(see*Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [3]; *City of Poughkeepsie v Hetey,*121 AD2d 496 [1986]). There was evidence presented at the hearing to support the conclusion that, contrary to the appellant’s contention, his failure to comply with the underlying order was willful *(see Ferraro v Ferraro,*272 AD2d 510 [2000]; *Matter of Gerzack v Gerzack,*87 AD2d 612 [1982]; *cf. Matter of Riccio v Paquette,*284 AD2d 335 [2001]; *Matter of Solerwitz v Signorelli,*183 AD2d 718 [1992]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Cozier and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

1963 BEECHCRAFT BONANZA

AIRCRAFT (Serial No. D-7293),

Defendant,

and

LAWRENCE RUNKE,

Claimant,

and

MICHAEL JOSEPH KEARNS,

Claimant - Appellant.

No. 09-2251

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-00938-BB-RHS)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, HARTZ, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This appeal is before the court based on a show cause order challenging appellate

jurisdiction and directing the parties to obtain a district court order either granting

certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) as to the August 6, 2009 Order appealed by

Appellate Case: 09-2251 Document: 01018361044 Date Filed: 02/03/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Claimant Michael Kearns or explicitly adjudicating the in rem civil forfeiture action initiated

by the Government. See Stockman's Water Company, LLC v. Vaca Partners, L.P., 425 F.3d

1263, 1265 (10th Cir. 2005); Lewis v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 850 F.2d 641, 645-46 (10th Cir.

1988).

This court lacks jurisdiction. The parties failed to move in the district court for a Rule

54(b) certification, and did not file anything in this court explaining their failure to do so.

No final judgment has been entered by the district court in the forfeiture action.

Consequently, the August 6, 2009 Order, which granted the Government’s motion to dismiss

Claimant Kearns’ counterclaim, is interlocutory and not immediately appealable under 28

U.S.C. § 1291 or under any recognized exception to the final judgment rule. 

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-2251 Document: 01018361044 Date Filed: 02/03/2010 Page: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            9
<CIK>                0001093897
<NAME>               Coastal Banking Company

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         989,172
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    6,527,012
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,527,583
<DEPOSITS>                                     0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            0
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,483
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,778,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 8,527,583
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              49,243
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               12,627
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               61,870
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,689
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          51,181
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (233,280)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (233,280)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (233,280)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
#### CITY OF TRENTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION

Connecting Youth to the Journey of Human 

Space Flight

Fatima Kamal

6/1/23 - 5/31/24

Three new STEM engagement activities will be created 

in consultation with elementary school science 

teachers: 1) Planetarium show focused on human 

space flight, the Artemis Missions and awareness of 

local career connections. This live and interactive 

program will use NASA images and video that 

highlights NASA mission discoveries and innovations. 

2) Maker Space Activity presenting students with a

hands-on challenge that models real world challenges 

faced when designing human space flight missions. 3) 

Field trip experience that engages students in human 

space flight and the Artemis Missions, guided through 

PacSci by a self-guided scavenger hunt that 

contextualizes these themes in exhibit content, and 

includes the planetarium show and maker activity. 

PacSci will also create pre- and post-visit videos, 

activities, and worksheets in both English and Spanish 

for teachers to utilize in their classrooms to build on the 

experience. 

List of Partners:

• Highline Public Schools

Pacific Science Center

Credits: Pacific Science Center

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC23K0796, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov