alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Time and Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010; 11 a.m.-12 Noon.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 27, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27748 Filed 10-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Exhibit 8.1



List of Subsidiaries



|Particulars                                 |  | Country of incorporation |  | 2016 (%) |     |  | 2015 (%) |  |     | 2014(%) | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------- | --- |  | -------- |  | --- | ------- | 
|Pace Info Com Park Private Limited          |  | India                    |  |          | -   |  |          |  | -   |         | 
|Sify Technologies (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.     |  | Singapore                |  |          | 100 |  |          |  | 100 |         | 
|Sify Technologies North America Corporation |  | United States            |  |          | 100 |  |          |  | 100 |         |
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

RICHARD STANFORTH, JR.; HELEN 

LUCERO, for themselves and all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

ARIZONA; FARMERS GROUP, INC.; 

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE 

COMPANY; FARMERS INSURANCE 

EXCHANGE; TRUCK INSURANCE 

EXCHANGE; BRISTOL WEST 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY ADVANTAGE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; 21ST CENTURY 

ASSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY CASUALTY COMPANY; 

21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

THE SOUTHWEST; 21ST CENTURY 

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; 

21ST CENTURY NORTH AMERICA 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY PREMIER INSURANCE 

COMPANY; FOREMOST INSURANCE 

COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, 

MICHIGAN; FOREMOST PROPERTY & 

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; 

FOREMOST SIGNATURE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY; WILLIAM B. TOBIN; 

DAVID ARAGON; JOHN AND JANE 

DOES, 1 through 250, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2131

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01146-RB-RHS)

(D. N.M.)

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

November 16, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2221 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 1 
2

-----------------------------

GARON FULGENZI, 

 Objector - Appellant

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

GARON FULGENZI, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL SMITH, individually and as 

defendant class representative for a 

defendant class of insurance agents 

licensed to sell automobile liability 

insurance in New Mexico for, and on 

behalf of, Farmers Group, Inc., d/b/a 

Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona; 

FARMERS GROUP, INC., d/b/a Farmers 

Insurance Company of Arizona, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2221

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-01261-RB-SCY)

(D. N.M.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before HOLMES, McHUGH, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted. See 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9) and Fed. R. 

App. P. Rule 42(b).

Appellate Case: 14-2221 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 2 
3

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-2221 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 3
Exhibit 10.1
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT; AMENDMENT TO ASSIGNMENTS
OF EARNINGS AND ASSIGNMENTS OF INSURANCES
 Second Amendment Amendment Date Borrower Trico Assets Trico Operators Lender Lenders Administrative Agent Collateral Agent
  Credit Agreement
 Assignment of Earnings Assignments of Earnings
 Assignment of Insurances Assignments of Insurances
 Second Amendment Effective Date
  Amendments to Credit Agreement




---



##### 



Amendments to Assignments of Earnings and Assignments of Insurances
  Section 11
   2




---



##### 



Miscellaneous Provisions
    4. THIS SECOND AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE
CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 3




---



##### 



myip@whitecase.com
   4




---



##### 



TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.By:Name:Title: TRICO MARINE ASSETS INC.By:Name:Title: TRICO MARINE OPERATORS, INC.By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



NORDEA BANK FINLAND PLC, NEW YORK BRANCH,
Individually and as Administrative Agent and as
Collateral AgentBy:Name:
    Martin LunderTitle:
    Senior Vice President By:Name:
    Martin KahmTitle:
    Vice President




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT,
DATED AS OF THE FIRST DATE WRITTEN ABOVE, AMONG TRICO MARINE
SERVICES, INC., TRICO MARINE ASSETS INC., TRICO MARINE
OPERATORS, INC., VARIOUS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND NORDEA
BANK FINLAND PLC, NEW YORK BRANCH, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

NAME OF INSTITUTION:
NORDEA BANK NORGE ASA, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCHBy:Name:
    Martin LunderTitle:
    Senior Vice President By:Name:
    Martin KahmTitle:
    Vice President




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT,
DATED AS OF THE FIRST DATE WRITTEN ABOVE, AMONG TRICO MARINE
SERVICES, INC., TRICO MARINE ASSETS INC., TRICO MARINE
OPERATORS, INC., VARIOUS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND NORDEA
BANK FINLAND PLC, NEW YORK BRANCH, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

NAME OF INSTITUTION:
BAYERISCHE HYPO-UND VEREINSBANK AGBy:Name:Title: By:Name:Title:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. pertaining to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(Form S-8 No. 333-30016 and post-effective amendments thereto), Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-96447), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96449), Teledyne, Inc. 401(k) Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-96451 and post-effective amendments thereto), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-96455), Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96457), Retirement Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-43962), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-54318), Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8
No. 333-54320), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-60236) and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(Form S-8 No. 333-60240) of our report dated January 19, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Water Pik
Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland
Hills, California
March 5, 2004

---

QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I.,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**JOHN WETZEL, JAMEY LUTHER, EDWARD EVENS, DONALD GELMANN,** 
**BILL MAILMAN,**

**Appellees :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 11 EAP 2015** 

**Appeal from the Memorandum and**

**Order of Commonwealth Court dated February 12, 2015 at No. 453 M.D.** 

**2014**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Com monwealth Court is** 

AFFIRMED

**.**
#### In the Matter of Michael V. Blumenthal et al., as Coexecutors of Robert K. Marceca, Deceased, Appellants, v Daniel Kingsford, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 354]

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about February 11, 2004, which, in a proceeding by estate executors against their former coexecutor for misappropriation of estate assets, denied petitioners’ motion to amend the petition so as to join respondent’s wife and three entities controlled by respondent and/or his wife, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While the better procedure would have been to allow joinder of the proposed respondents, if jurisdiction over them could be had, since, absent prejudice or surprise, leave to amend pleadings should be freely given *(Battery Bldg. Maintenance Co. v 888 Seventh Ave. Assoc.,*157 AD2d 556 [1990]; CPLR 3025 [b]), the record shows that before commencing the proceeding, petitioners were aware of the proposed respondents’ receipt of allegedly misappropriated funds, yet they inexplicably waited some nine months after learning of the identity of the proposed respondents before attempting to join them. In the order on appeal, the Surrogate directed the immediate filing of a note of issue and the completion of disclosure in three weeks; the trial of this matter was thereafter completed in early May of 2004. Thus, the relief sought on appeal, if granted, would result in the possible invalidation of the trial court’s findings and a return to further pretrial discovery, an inefficient use of judicial resources. It should be noted that petitioners never sought to stay the trial pending the outcome of this appeal. Finally, it appears that New York lacks jurisdiction over two of the four proposed respondents. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
No. 14,372.

#### McBride *v.*Hicklin.

*Animals.*— Impounding *of by Supervisor.*— Compensation *for Care and*Feed.— A supervisor who takes up and impounds sheep which have escaped from the enclosure of the owner, can not recover for feeding and caring for them, where the owner immediately makes diligent search for them. Such animals can not be considered as running at large within the meaning of the statute (section 2637, E>. S. 1881, *et seq.).*

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

*N. G. Buff*and *P. M. Foley,*for appellant.

*W. J. Whitaker*and *T. W. Harper,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The appellant, acting in his official capacity of supervisor, took up and impounded thirty-eight sheep belonging to the appellee, and he brought this action to recover for feeding and caring for them. The second paragraph of the answer alleges that the animals escaped from the enclosure of the appellee late in the night, and that early the next morning he hunted for and found them.

Conceding, but not deciding, that a supervisor who takes up animals found running at large, may recover the compensation provided by the statute (sections 2637, 2643, R. S. 1881,) in a personal action against the owner, the answer is nevertheless good, for the statute does not apply to cases where the animals escaped from the enclosure of the owner, *500and he at once makes diligent search for them. *Jones*v. *Clouser,*114 Ind. 387; *Rutter*v. *Henry,*20 N. E. Rep. (Ohio), 334.

Filed June 26, 1890.

All that it is proper for us to decide, and all that we do decide, is that animals which escape from their owner’s enclosure can not be considered as running at large, within the meaning of the statute, in a case where, as here, the owner makes diligent efforts to recover them.

The appellant did recover some damages below, and, as there is no specification in the motion for a new trial, challenging the amount of recovery, no question is presented for our consideration. *Davis*v. *Montgomery,*123 Ind. 587.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,246
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   601
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,098
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          55,934
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            56,214
<LOANS>                                        169,493
<ALLOWANCE>                                        543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,853
<DEPOSITS>                                     186,532
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,720
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,719
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 247,853
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,491
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,008
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   180
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,679
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,829
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,850
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       10
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    871
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         871
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.06
<LOANS-NON>                                        102
<LOANS-PAST>                                       327
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   533
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  543
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               363
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            180
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY; GARRISON PROPERTY 

AND CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

ESTATE OF JOSEPH THREADGILL, 

 Defendant - Appellant,

and

THOMAS I. HANCOCK, 

 Defendant.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

PRISCILLA THREADGILL, Individually 

and as Personal Representative of the 

Wrongful Death estate of Joseph 

Threadgill; DAVID THREADGILL; 

DANIELLE THREADGILL, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE 

ASSOCIATION CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY; GARRISON 

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2041

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-01062-RB-LAM)

No. 14-2187

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-01257-RB-KK)

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 21, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2041 Document: 01019373142 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 1 
2

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The stipulation filed by the parties to dismiss the captioned appeals is granted. See

Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b). Each party shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-2041 Document: 01019373142 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlyle Dale, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 613]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered April 18, 2000, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea should be vacated because he was not adequately advised that he would be subject to a term of postrelease supervision *(see*Penal Law § 70.45) is unpreserved for appellate review *(see e.g. People v Russell,*7 AD3d 818 [2004]; *People v Miller,*1 AD3d 613 [2003]; *People v Melio,*304 AD2d 247 [2003]; *cf. People v Lindsey,*302 AD2d 128, 131 n 2 [2003]), and, in any event, is without merit *(see e.g. People v Wronka,*6 AD3d 735 [2004]; *People v Cruz,*305 AD2d 424 [2003]). Moreover, the failure of the County Court to specify the term of postrelease supervision at the time of sentence does not warrant vacatur of the plea *(see e.g. People v Boyce,*12 AD3d 728 [2004]; *Matter of Deal v Goord,*8 AD3d 769 [2004]; *People v Hollenbach,*307 AD2d 776 [2003]; *People v Crump,*302 AD2d 901 [2003]; *People v Thweatt,*300 AD2d 1100 [2002]; *People v White,*296 AD2d 867 [2002]). H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey A. Wise, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Interim Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/s/    JEFFREY A. WISE                                                          
|                                                                                
|Jeffrey A. Wise Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Interim Treasurer



May
14, 2004



27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                       575
<INVENTORY>                                     10,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,459
<PP&E>                                          18,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,141
<SALES>                                         15,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,632
<CGS>                                            4,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,387
<INCOME-TAX>                                       138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of KPMG, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Sify Technologies Limited: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-165248) on Form S-8 of Sify Technologies Limited and subsidiaries ofour report dated November 30, 2010 with respect to the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of Sify Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2010 which report appears in theMarch 31, 2012 annual report on Form 20-F of Sify Technologies Limited. 

Our report states that we were not engaged to audit, review, orapply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively revise the segment disclosures as described in note 34 to the consolidated financial statements under the heading “reorganization of business segments”. Those adjustments wereaudited by a successor auditor. 

/s/KPMG                                        

KPMG 

Chennai, India 

August 13, 2012
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Harris Interactive Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon
S. Black, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                         Signature: /s/ GORDON S. BLACK
                                    ------------------------
                                        Gordon S. Black
                                       Chairman and Chief
                                        Executive Officer





Dated: September 26, 2003

















                                       1