alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 2-4 p.m.

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Closed to the Public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Compliance Weekly Report—Commission Briefing

The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: February 2, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-2809 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tislam Allah, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 896]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 16, 1992 *(People v Allah,*187 AD2d 600 [1992]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 20, 1990.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1817

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include influenza vaccines 

in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Injury Compensation 

Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVENUE MEASURE TO APPLY TO INFLUENZA 

4 VACCINE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(M) Any vaccine against influenza.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
2

•S 1817 IS 

1 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to sales and uses begin3 ning on July 1, 2004. 

4 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

5 (1) and section 4132 of the Internal Revenue Code 

6 of 1986, in the case of sales before the date de7 scribed in paragraph (1) for which delivery is made 

8 on or after such date, the delivery date shall be con9 sidered the sale date.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0196

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN LEE LEGARE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until June 22, 2020 to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 22 2020

05/22/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0196
Ex-99.2 a)


                                                                       EXHIBIT 1

                  MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE
                      WITH USAP MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS

March 7, 2002


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $400,000,000 and $50,000,000,
respectively.



<PAGE>


/s/ David Applegate
------------------------------
David Applegate
Chief Executive Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp.




/s/ Ralph Hall
------------------------------
Ralph Hall
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp.
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Hanks, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of English Language
Learning and Instruction System, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                              /s/ Dennis Hanks
Date: March 26, 2004          ____________________________________
                              Dennis Hanks
                              Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Silton, Chief Executive Officer of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL
SILTONMichael Silton President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)


Date: March 4, 2011
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2128 

To define the term ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ as used in the Constitution of 

the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of President. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2004 

Mr. NICKLES (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To define the term ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ as used in the 

Constitution of the United States to establish eligibility 

for the Office of President. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Born Citizen 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ‘‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’’. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Congress finds and declares that 

8 the term ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ in Article II, Section 1, 

9 Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States means— 
2 

•S 2128 IS 

1 (1) any person born in the United States and 

2 subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and 

3 (2) any person born outside the United 

4 States— 

5 (A) who derives citizenship at birth from a 

6 United States citizen parent or parents pursu7 ant to an Act of Congress; or 

8 (B) who is adopted by 18 years of age by 

9 a United States citizen parent or parents who 

10 are otherwise eligible to transmit citizenship to 

11 a biological child pursuant to an Act of Con12 gress. 

13 (b) UNITED STATES.—In this section, the term 

14 ‘‘United States’’, when used in a geographic sense, means 

15 the several States of the United States and the District 

16 of Columbia. 

Æ
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350


The
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the preceding Annual Report on Form 10-K
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained therein fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Pacific Financial Corporation.





/s/ Dennis A. Long
                  
                  /s/ Denise PortmannDennis
      A. Long
                  
                  Denise
      PortmannPresident
      and
                  
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerChief
      Executive Officer
                  
                  March
      22, 2010March
      22, 2010
“I thought it was _________ at first, but _____________ what a find! Everyone else will love it if we bring it back.” Callie says, 

“You make it sound like we’re hunting for food. I’ll stick to my dehydrated __________ 

The two of you continue ________________ the area. At one point, you stare 

When you regroup, you compare the _____________ Moon rocks that you and 

Callie found. A couple of hers look like _____________ _______________, while yours 

Callie suddenly says, “Race you!” and the two of you attempt to run back to the rover, but with 

Back at the base, mission control congratulates the two of you on doing some ___________ 

[food] 

ending in -ing] 

[adjective] 

[adverb] 

Greetings from the 

Moon. 

 

N ASA'S PROMISE FOR HUMANI T Y 

Your Adventure with Callie 

“Every time I put on this spacesuit, I forget this suit is so ____________. How do we do this so often, again?” you say, bemoaning 

[adjective] 

the ____________ space suit you’re putting on. 

[adjective] 

“It’s not like it’s going to be annoying when you’re _________________ in low gravity. And come on, we’re going to ___________ [verb ending in -ing] [verb] 

today!” Callie says. You finally finish gearing up, and the both of you head out to the lunar habitat. 

As you get into the rover, you admire the ______________ view. The surface of the Moon looks wonderfully _____________ today. 

[adjective] [adjective] 

Looking out at the gray horizon, Callie says, “Wow. Looks just like ___________________.” 

[favorite place/location] 

You continue to move __________ along, but when you see some ___________ on the ground, you stop to take a look. 

[adverb] [noun] 

[noun] [interjection] 

inspecting the __________ item before picking it up. 

[adjective] 

instead, thank you very much.” 

[verb ending in -ing] 

out into space and see a small light that you identify as ____________. [planet] 

[adjective] 

[plural noun] [verb 

look like ____________ _______________. 

[plural noun] [verb ending in -ing] 

the gravity you both look more like ____________ _______________. [plural animal] [verb ending in -ing] 

scavenging. You and Callie high-five and say, “_____________!” 

[interjection] 

nasa.gov/calliefirst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          42,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,579,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,603
<INVENTORY>                                  1,313,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,463,755
<PP&E>                                       1,609,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 967,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,225,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,115,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,496,864
<OTHER-SE>                                   (386,278)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,225,799
<SALES>                                      4,612,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,612,124
<CGS>                                        2,933,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,593,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 270,727
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   256,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,669,676
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  502,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    82,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,403,846
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,399,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,335,720
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    70
<COMMON>                                       1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,271,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,399,948
<SALES>                                        1,594,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,594,330
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,393,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                   64,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (49,447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1835 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1835

To extend the effective period of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 
                   (18 U.S.C. 922 note) for 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2003

 Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the effective period of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 
                   (18 U.S.C. 922 note) for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET PROVISION.

    Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (Public 
Law 100-649; 18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended by striking ``Sunset.--
Effective 15 years'' and inserting ``Sunset.--Effective 25 years''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Malden, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    NICHOLAS
MALDENNicholas Malden Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary July 31, 2003




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LAWRENCE G. ADAMS,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 480 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### John Mascola, Appellant, v City University of New York et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 655]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 22, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The alleged gender-based employment violations under the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]) are keyed to federal standards *(see Ferrante v American Lung Assn.,*90 NY2d 623, 629 [1997]), and governed by a three-year statute of limitations (CPLR 214 [2]; *Koerner v State of New York,*62 NY2d 442 [1984]). Even assuming the truth of the facts pleaded, and *410granting plaintiff every favorable inference, the claim for hostile work environment was properly dismissed because the allegations did not rise to the level of being “severe or pervasive” *(see Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v Vinson, 477*US 57, 67 [1986]). Plaintiff did not adequately allege facts to give rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination *(see Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v Burdine,*450 US 248, 253 [1981]) for failure to promote. Regarding the claim of constructive discharge, plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficiently to support an inference that defendants deliberately created working conditions so intolerable, difficult or unpleasant that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign *(see Stetson v NYNEX Serv. Co.,*995 F2d 355, 361 [2d Cir 1993]).

As the claims against the university were properly dismissed, the court also properly dismissed the claims against the individual defendants for aiding and abetting *(see Trovato v Air Express Intl.,*238 AD2d 333 [1997]; *compare Murphy v ERA United Realty,*251 AD2d 469, 472 [1998]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.