alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1921

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for 11 

circuit judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to 

provide for 11 circuit judges on the United States Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURT OF AP4 PEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIR5 CUIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table under section 44(a) of 

7 title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
2

•S 1921 IS 

1 item relating to the District of Columbia and inserting the 

2 following:

‘‘District of Columbia ............................................................................... 11’’.

3 (b) EXISTING VACANCY NOT FILLED.—In order to 

4 comply with the amendment made under subsection (a), 

5 1 of the vacancies of circuit judges on the United States 

6 Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 

7 which existed on the date preceding the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, shall not be filled.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a new 
charter has been issued for the Federal Aviation Administration Air 
Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee (ATPAC). The duties of this 
advisory committee include:
    1. To make recommendations for standardizing, clarifying, and 
upgrading terminology and procedures, as a result of its review of 
present ATC procedures and practices.
    2. To provide advice and make recommendations concerning:
    a. New or significantly revised ATC procedural concepts.
    b. The adequacy of charts, diagrams, and illustrations used to 
convey information concerning the application of ATC procedures and 
their relevance to current, revised, or proposed ATC procedures and 
concepts.
    c. Aviation regulations that have an impact on present, new, or 
significantly revised ATC procedures and concepts.
    3. To act solely in an advisory capacity to accomplish its duties.

DATES: Effective October 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Ray, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone 
(202) 267-9205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 9(c) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of the filing of the ATPAC Charter, Effective October 29, 
2010.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 29, 2010.
Elizabeth Ray,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-27832 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### The State *v.*Cromwell and Another.

*Tuesday,*January 30, 1844.

The declaration, in a suit by the state on a sheriff’s bond, need not aver that the bond had been approved and recorded.

ERROR to the *Clay*Circuit Court.

*J. M. Hanna,*for the state.

Dewet, J.

— Debt against a sheriff and his sureties on his official bond, conditioned for the faithful discharge of his duties. Breach, that the sheriff voluntarily permitted a prisoner, who had been convicted of a crime and fined, to escape. Special demurrer to the declaration, assigning for cause, that it did not appear that the bond had been “ approved and recorded as required by law.” The Court sustained the demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendants.

This decision was wrong. There was no need of averring that the bond had been approved or recorded. Neither was essential to its validity.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
# Canadian Space Agency astronaut David Saint-Jacques

iss059e001272 (March 19, 2019) --- Canadian Space Agency astronaut David Saint-Jacques moves a U.S spacesuit inside the Destiny laboratory module.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/canadian-space-agency-astronaut-david-saint-jacques-40507362583-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
TakenMarch 19, 2019Image CreditNASASize5568x3712pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 17, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### O. H. Thompson *v.*Thomas Belknap, Affirmed. O. H. Thompson *v.*John Warhurton’s Exrs., Reversed.

Nonresidence — Constructive Service —Bond Before Judgment Rendered.

Before a judgment can be rendered against a non-resident, constructively summoned, tbe plaintiff must execute to him a bond as provided in section 444, Civil Code.

APPEAL ER0M KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 6, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

It sufficiently appears that the prosecution of these appeals was authorized by Thompson through Greer; the rule to dismiss them, therefore, will be discharged.

Without entering upon a discussion of the alleged errors, in detail for which appellant seeks a reversal of the judgments, it will *489suffice to say that in the judgment of Belknap against the appellant we perceive no available error to the appellant’s prejudice; that judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

*8. M. Moore,*for Appellant.

*Stephenson & Myers,*for Appellee.

But the judgment in favor of Warhurton’s executors is, upon a single ground, deemed erroneous and will have to be reversed. The appellants having been only constructively summoned it was necessary before rendering any judgment against them that a bond be executed to them agreeably to the provisions of section 440 of the Civil Code. There is nothing in the record to show that the paper purporting to have been signed by Stephenson & Myers was executed and acknowledged as required by the Code, nor as certified by the clerk can it be regarded as part of the record. The requisite bond not, therefore, appearing to have been given the judgment is erroneous. Payne *v.*Witherspoon, 14 B. Mon. 272.

Therefore, said rule is discharged and the judgment in favor of Belknap is affirmed and the judgment in favor of Warhurton’s executors is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Talent Acquisition

Information for 10 Point Preference Eligibles

Talent Acquisition

Information for 10 Point Preference Eligibles

The following information only applies to veterans and their family members who are eligible for 

10-point preference. If this does not apply to you, please return to NASA Careers for information 

on other employment opportunities and processes.

If you are a 10-point preference eligible, you may apply for employment consideration even if 

there are currently no open announcements for positions in which you are interested. Please 

read all of the following information before you decide you are a 10-Point Eligible.

Upon request, you will be required to submit proof of veterans preference to include DD-214, 

SF-15 and proof required by SF-15. Veterans preference will only be considered based on 

supported documentation. Failure to provide proof to preference claim within stated time period 

may result in losing consideration for opportunity. 

What is a 10-point preference eligible?

This term refers to individuals who, as a result of military service or as a result of their 

connection to someone with military service, are entitled to special preference in the Federal 

hiring process. This category includes disabled veterans, spouses of disabled veterans, 

widows/widowers of deceased veterans, and parents of deceased veterans. For more 

information on 10-point preference, consult the Office of Personnel Management Feds Hire Vets 

website.

What does this preference mean to me?

Individuals with 10-point preference are entitled to special consideration in the hiring process 

when they apply to open vacancy announcements. The Feds Hire Vets website contains more 

details.

In addition, all Executive Branch Federal agencies are required to accept applications from 10-

point preference eligibles even if there are currently no open vacancies.

How do I exercise this option?

If you are interested in a vacancy announcement that is currently open, we encourage you to 

apply directly to the announcement on USAJOBS. Applying directly will ensure that you have 

addressed application specific questions and provide you with the opportunity to address 

position specific requirements and tailor your resume to demonstrate how your skills match the 

job qualifications.

If you are a 10-point veteran, you will be given preference in hiring in accordance with 

applicable federal policies.

If you are a 10-point veteran and wish to submit a late or unsolicited application, please submit 
2

Talent Acquisition

Information for 10 Point Preference Eligibles

an inquiry to the NASA Shared Service Center Customer Contact Center at: 

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/nssc/forms/web-inquiry

Please specify the Category as “Human Resources”, the Area as “Inquiry” and in the 

Description include that you are requesting to apply as a 10-point later filer and list the specific 

vacancy announcement number (sample # format: HQ-21-DE-11111111-AB) for which you 

would like to be considered, if applicable.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES W. BURBANK, 

 Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

UTAH, all Judges; UTAH STATE

POLITICAL ENTITIES; UTAH TAX

COMMISSION; UTAH DMV; DULY

AND AUTHORIZED ACTING

JUDGES OF THE STATE OF UTAH;

UINTAH COUNTY, political

subdivision of the State of Utah;

UINTAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT, political subdivision

of the State of Utah; UINTAH

COUNTY ATTORNEY, political

subdivision of the State of Utah,

 Defendants, 

v. 

DALE NOLEN STEVENS,

 Counterclaim-Defendant - 

 Appellant,

MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL;

CURTIS RICHMOND; THOMAS

SMITH; THE ORDER OF WHITE

LIGHT, a Utah corporation, d/b/a The

Western Arbitration Council; 

No. 10-4126

(D.C. No. 2:04-CV-00742-SPF-DN)

Appellate Case: 10-4126 Document: 01018461185 Date Filed: 07/21/2010 Page: 1
2

WAMPANOAG NATION, Tribe of

Grayhead, Wolf Band, an

unincorporated association-in-fact,

 Counterclaim-Defendants,

and

UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH; JOANN

B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County

Attorney; RICK HAWKINS; JOHN

LAURSEN, Uintah County Deputy

Sheriff, 

 Counter-Claimants - Appellees.

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, Chief Circuit Judge, and O’BRIEN and GORSUCH, Circuit

Judges.

This is an appeal from a non-final order of the magistrate judge denying the

appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss for lack of appellate

jurisdiction.

This order is not directly appealable to this court. Except for proceedings

conducted by the magistrate judge on consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c), a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal taken directly

from a decision of a magistrate judge. See Colorado Building & Construction

Trade Council v. B.B. Andersen Construction Co., 879 F.2d 809 (10th Cir. 1989). 

Appellate Case: 10-4126 Document: 01018461185 Date Filed: 07/21/2010 Page: 2
3

Moreover, the denial of the appointment of counsel is not immediately

appealable. See Cotner v. Mason, 657 F.2d 1390 (10th Cir. 1981).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-4126 Document: 01018461185 Date Filed: 07/21/2010 Page: 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending October 9, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0243.
    Date Filed: October 6, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 27, 2009.
    Description: Application of Albinati Aeronautics SA (``Albinati'') 
requesting a foreign air carrier permit to the full extent authorized 
by the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of Switzerland 
and the Government of the United States of America in order to engage 
in: (i) Charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and 
mail from points behind Switzerland via Switzerland and intermediate 
points to a point or points in the United States and beyond; and (ii) 
Fifth Freedom charter service pursuant to the prior approval 
requirements set forth in Part 212 of the Department's Economic 
Regulations.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0244.
    Date Filed: October 6, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 27, 2009.
    Description: Application of Hellenic Imperial Airways 
(``Hellenic'') requesting exemption authority and a foreign air carrier 
permit to conduct scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of 
persons, property, and mail, between a point or points in the European 
Community and the Member States of the European Union, and a point or 
points in the United States, to the full extent allowed under the Air 
Transport Agreement between the United States and the European 
Community and the Member States of the European Union.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-2789 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DWIGHT MASON.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80257

(303) 844-3157

January 05, 2016

Chris Wolpert

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Mr. Joel McElroy Carson III

Carson Ryan 

P.O. Box 1612

Roswell, NM 88201

RE: 14-2059, United States v. Dally

Dist/Ag docket: 1:12-CV-01056-MV-KBM, 1:07-CR-00748-MV-3

Dear Counsel: 

Enclosed is a copy of the order and judgment issued today in this matter. The court has 

entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14 

days after entry of judgment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in 

which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must 

be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal 

Rules and local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements. 

In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is 

permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting rehearing en 

banc, the requesting party must file 12 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to 

satisfying all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, 

and 10th Cir. R.35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing.

Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court 

Appellate Case: 14-2059 Document: 01019548615 Date Filed: 01/05/2016 Page: 1 
2

cc: Randy M. Castellano

David N. Williams

Travis Loren Dally

EAS/kf

Appellate Case: 14-2059 Document: 01019548615 Date Filed: 01/05/2016 Page: 2
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets
and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017




By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1835

To extend the effective period of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 

(18 U.S.C. 922 note) for 10 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To extend the effective period of the Undetectable Firearms 

Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) for 10 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET PROVISION. 

4 Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 

5 1988 (Public Law 100–649; 18 U.S.C. 922 note) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘SUNSET.—Effective 15 years’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘SUNSET.—Effective 25 years’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial
Holding Company (the "Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rodger E. Rees, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Rodger E. Rees                                   March 20, 2006
------------------------                             --------------
Rodger E. Rees                                            Date
Chief Financial Officer
S. 2057

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United States

Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the members in

connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and Recuperation Leave

Program before the program was expanded to include domestic travel.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION COSTS

INCURRED BY MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES

ARMED FORCES ON REST AND RECUPERATION LEAVE.

The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse a member of the

United States Armed Forces for transportation expenses incurred

by such member for one round trip by such member between two

locations within the United States in connection with leave taken

under the Central Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program

during the period beginning on September 25, 2003, and ending

on December 18, 2003.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.