6354 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices 

to CBP to assess antidumping duties on 

appropriate entries. 

To determine whether the duty 

assessment rates covering the period 

were de minimis, in accordance with 

the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we 

calculated importer (or customer)- 

specific ad valorem rates by aggregating 

the dumping margins calculated for all 

U.S. sales to that importer or customer 

and dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to that 

importer (or customer). Where an 

importer (or customer)-specific ad 

valorem rate is greater than de minimis, 

and the respondent has reported reliable 

entered values, we apply the assessment 

rate to the entered value of the 

importer’s/customer’s entries during the 

review period. Where an importer (or 

customer)- specific ad valorem rate is 

greater than de minimis and we do not 

have reliable entered values, we 

calculate a per–unit assessment rate by 

aggregating the dumping duties due for 

all U.S. sales to each importer (or 

customer) and dividing this amount by 

the total quantity sold to that importer 

(or customer). 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by the respondent for which 

it did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the all– 

others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following antidumping duty 

deposit rates will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of pasta from Italy entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of these final results, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) for 

Erasmo, Indalco, PAM, Lensi, Pagani, 

Labor, Garofalo, Riscossa, Rummo, and 

Rustichella, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established in the final results 

of this review; (2) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, but was 

covered in a previous review or the 

original less–than-fair–value (LTFV) 

investigation, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company–specific 

rate established for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the LTFV investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the subject merchandise; and (4) if 

neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer is a firm covered by this 

review, a prior review, or the LTFV 

investigation, the cash deposit rate will 

be 15.45 percent, the all–others rate 

established in the implementation of the 

findings of the WTO Panel in US – 

Zeroing (EC). See Implementation of the 

Findings of the WTO Panel in US – 

Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations 

Under Section 129 of the Uruguay 

Round Agreements Act and Revocations 

and Partial Revocations of Certain 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 

(May 4, 2007). These cash deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding APOs 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(5). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 2, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

List of Comments in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

General 

Comment 1: Wheat Code Methodology 

Comment 2: Application of Review– 

Specific All Other Rate 

Garofalo 

Comment 3: Garofalo’s Submitted 

Wheat Code 

Comment 4: Garofalo’s Arms–Length 

Test 

Comment 5: Cost Reporting Period 

PAM 

Comment 6: Collapsing of PAM’s Wheat 

Code for Model Match 

Comment 7: Inclusion of Transport 

Recovery in the U.S. Sales Calculation 

Comment 8: Treatment of AGEA 

Performance Bond 

Comment 9: General Expenses 

Comment 10: Insurance Claim as an 

Offset to G&A Expense 

Comment 11: Over–reported Costs 

[FR Doc. 2010–2802 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[Docket No. 0907081109–0060–04] 

RIN 0648–ZC10 

NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration 

Program Project Grants under the 

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; 

Correction 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of funding availability; 

Date correction. 

SUMMARY: This notice corrects an error 

contained in the notice published in the 

Federal Register on January 19, 2010. 

That notice announced the NOAA Great 

Lakes Habitat Restoration Program 

Project Grants competition and 

contained an incorrect date for postmark 

of hard copy applications. 

DATES: Hard copy applications must be 

postmarked, or provided to a delivery 

service and documented with a receipt, 

by 11:59 p.m. EST on February 16, 2010. 

Hard copy applications postmarked or 


Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices 6355 

provided to a delivery service after 

11:59 p.m. EST February 16, 2010 will 

not be considered for funding. 

Electronic applications must be 

submitted through www.grants.gov by 

11:59 p.m. EST on February 16, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: NOAA Restoration Center 

(F/HC3) NOAA Fisheries, Office of 

Habitat Conservation, 1315 East West 

Highway, Rm. 14730, Silver Spring, MD 

20910 Attn: Great Lakes 

HabitatRestoration Project Applications. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information contact Jenni 

Wallace at (301) 713—0174 ext. 183, or 

by e-mail at Jenni.Wallace@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 19, 2010, the NOAA Great Lakes 

Habitat Restoration Program Project 

Grants announced its solicitation for 

applications under the Great Lakes 

Restoration Initiative in the NOAA 

Notice of Availability of Grant Funds for 

Fiscal Year 2010, published in the 

Federal Register (75 FR 3101). That 

announcement listed an incorrect 

deadline for postmarking or receipt by 

delivery service of hard copy mailings. 

The correct deadline for postmarking or 

receipt by delivery service of a hard 

copy application is 11:59 p.m. EST on 

February 16, 2010. The deadline for 

electronic submissions remains 

unchanged and continues to be 11:59 

p.m. EST on February 16, 2010. 

All other information and 

requirements as published in the 

January 19, 2010 notice remain 

unchanged. 

Intergovernmental review: 

Applications submitted by state and 

local governments are subject to the 

provisions of Executive Order 12372, 

‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal 

Programs.’’ Any applicant submitting an 

application for funding is required to 

complete item 16 on SF–424 regarding 

clearance by the State Single Point of 

Contact (SPOC) established as a result of 

EO 12372. To find out and comply with 

a State’s process under EO 12372, the 

names, addresses and phone numbers of 

participating SPOCs are listed in the 

Office of Management and Budget’s 

home page at: http:// 

www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/ 

spoc.html 

Limitation of liability: In no event will 

NOAA or the Department of Commerce 

be responsible for proposal preparation 

costs if these programs fail to receive 

funding or are cancelled because of 

other agency priorities. Publication of 

this announcement does not oblige 

NOAA to award any specific project or 

to obligate any available funds. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA): NOAA must analyze the 

potential environmental impacts, as 

required by the National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant 

projects or proposals which are seeking 

NOAA federal funding opportunities. 

Detailed information on NOAA 

compliance with NEPA can be found at 

the following NOAA NEPA website: 

http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including 

our NOAA Administrative Order 216–6 

for NEPA, http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/ 

NAO216l6lTOC.pdf, and the Council 

on Environmental Quality 

implementation regulations, http:// 

ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/ 

toclceq.htm. Consequently, as part of 

an applicant’s package, and under their 

description of their program activities, 

applicants are required to provide 

detailed information on the activities to 

be conducted, locations, sites, species 

and habitat to be affected, possible 

construction activities, and any 

environmental concerns that may exist 

(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous 

or toxic chemicals, introduction of nonindigenous species, impacts to 

endangered and threatened species, 

aquaculture projects, and impacts to 

coral reef systems). In addition to 

providing specific information that will 

serve as the basis for any required 

impact analyses, applicants may also be 

requested to assist NOAA in drafting of 

an environmental assessment, if NOAA 

determines an assessment is required. 

Applicants will also be required to 

cooperate with NOAA in identifying 

feasible measures to reduce or avoid any 

identified adverse environmental 

impacts of their proposal. The failure to 

do so shall be grounds for not selecting 

an application. In some cases if 

additional information is required after 

an application is selected, funds can be 

withheld by the Grants Officer under a 

special award condition requiring the 

recipient to submit additional 

environmental compliance information 

sufficient to enable NOAA to make an 

assessment on any impacts that a project 

may have on the environment. 

The Department of Commerce preaward notification requirements for 

grants and cooperative agreements: The 

Department of Commerce Pre-Award 

Notification Requirements for Grants 

and Cooperative Agreements contained 

in the Federal Register notice of 

February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696), are 

applicable to this solicitation. 

Paperwork Reduction Act: This 

document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The 

use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, 

and SF–LLL and CD–346 has been 

approved by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) under the respective 

control numbers 0348–0043, 0348–0044, 

0348–0040, 0348–0046, and 0605–0001. 

Notwithstanding any other provision of 

law, no person is required to, nor shall 

a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with, a collection of 

information subject to the requirements 

of the PRA unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

OMB control number. 

Executive Order 12866: This notice 

has been determined to be not 

significant for purposes of Executive 

Order 12866. 

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): 

It has been determined that this notice 

does not contain policies with 

Federalism implications as that term is 

defined in Executive Order 13132. 

Administrative Procedure Act/ 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: Prior notice 

and an opportunity for public comment 

are not required by the Administrative 

Procedure Act or any other law for rules 

concerning public property, loans, 

grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C. 

553(a)(2)). Because notice and 

opportunity for comment are not 

required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any 

other law, the analytical requirements 

for the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable. 

Therefore, a regulatory flexibility 

analysis has not been prepared. 

Dated: February 4, 2010. 

Tammy L. Journet, 

Deputy Director, Acquisition and Grants 

Office, Contracting Officer, National Oceanic 

and Atmospheric Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2805 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–12–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket Number: 100114022–0024–01] 

Manufacturing Extension Partnership 

(MEP) Availability of Funds for Three 

Regions Including the State of Arizona, 

Chicago Region of the State of Illinois 

and the Identified Counties in Central 

Pennsylvania 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology invites 

proposals from qualified organizations 

for funding projects that provide 

manufacturing extension services to 

primarily small- and medium-sized 

manufacturers in the United States. 

These projects will establish 

manufacturing extension centers under 


Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES