alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), Christopher Gleeson, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, and Larry Mehren, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, do each hereby certify pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|July 20, 2007                                                       
|                                                                    
|/s/    CHRISTOPHER
GLEESON                                          
|Christopher Gleeson President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|July 20, 2007                                                            
|                                                                         
|/s/    LARRY MEHREN                                                      
|Larry Mehren Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### WILLIE CROOMS v. CENTRAL STEEL DRUM CO.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 156 *N. J. Super.*471)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-83794 dated March 6, 2002 and No. 333-83800
dated March 6, 2002) of Somera Communications, Inc. of our report dated January
29, 2002, relating to the financial statements which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated January 29, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 15, 2002
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 2, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00963-CR

GARRICK IAN HASTINGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1403750

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The jury 

sentenced appellant to confinement for sixty years in the Institutional Division of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $10,000. Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 
2

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by advancing frivolous contentions 

which arguably might support the appeal. See Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. 

State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of 

the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 

813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The record was provided to appellant and 

on November 4, 2014, appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s response, 

and agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the 

jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an 

Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable 

grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>   1
                              [VENTANA LETTERHEAD]



EXHIBIT 10.20B

February 26, 1998



Mr. Jack W. Schuler
C/O Crabtree Partners
1419 Lake Cook Road
Suite 410
Deerfield, IL 60015


Dear Jack:

        This letter is to confirm the extension for an additional two years of
the arrangement (the "Arrangement") under which you have agreed to devote a
significant portion of your professional working time to the business and
affairs of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., ("Ventana" or the "Company").

        Under the extension of the Arrangement, you would receive a grant of a
nonstatutory option to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company
at an exercise price of $12.625 per share, the fair market value of the
Company's Common Stock on the date that the extension of the Arrangement, as
well as the grant of these additional options, was approved by the Company's
Board of Directors. These options would vest on a cumulative monthly basis over
24 months commencing February 26, 1998; provided that during such 24 month
vesting period you devote, on a cumulative average basis, at least 50% of your
professional working time to matters related to the Company.

        Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing the
enclosed counterpart of this letter.

Very truly yours,

/s/ HANK PIETRASZEK
-------------------
Hank Pietraszek
President & CFO


        Acknowledged and agreed as of this  23rd  day of   April   , 1998.
                                           ------        ----------

                                        /s/ JACK W. SCHULER
                                        ---------------------------
                                              Jack W. Schuler
- NExIS Home
- About
- Resources
- Missions & Servicing Technologies   - Patented Technologies
  - In-Space Servicing, Assembly
  - OSAM-1 Mission
  - Relative Navigation System
  - Robotic Servicing Arm
  - Propellant Transfer Technologies
  - Robotic Refueling Mission 3
  - RRM: Phase 1&2
  - Raven
  - Robotic External Leak Locator

# Robotic Servicing Arm

A seven-degree-of-freedom robot arm is used on missions as diverse as on-orbit satellite servicing, asteroid capture, and the assembly and servicing of large telescopes in space.

## 

#### 

#### 

The Robotic Servicing Arm has extensive heritage from arms used in past Mars rover missions. The system design heavily leverages the flight-qualified robotic arm developed for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)’s Spacecraft for the Universal Modification of Orbits and Front-end Robotics Enabling Near-term Demonstration (FREND) programs in the mid-2000s. In particular, it builds off of previous NASA and DARPA investments in motion control, robotic software frameworks, flex harnesses, force-torque sensor, joint design, and flight operations experience.

# Range of Motion

Opening a door, grabbing a pencil, pouring a glass of water; these are all are examples of simple, everyday tasks that use your arm. Like your arm, the NASA servicing robot has “seven degrees of freedom”— a three-axis shoulder, a pitch actuator at the elbow, and a three-axis spherical wrist. Other features include a six-axis force/torque sensor at the end of the arm, and a flex harness that routes data, power, and video.

With such a high level of maneuverability, this arm is ideally suited for missions requiring autonomous capture and dexterous operations — from grabbing a satellite for on-orbit servicing, to extracting a boulder from an spinning asteroid, to assembling and servicing a large telescope in orbit, or setting up worksites on Mars for astronauts.

# An Early Version Arrives at Goddard

In the process of building space hardware, an engineering design unit (EDU) is manufactured before final flight hardware. An EDU is made of less expensive materials that are simpler to manufacture and subjected to less stringent qualifications, allowing them to be manufactured in about half the time needed for flight hardware. An EDU helps “work out the kinks.” It also helps ensure that final flight hardware will not need to be modified after it is assembled.

In June 2015, we welcomed an EDU of the robot arm to Goddard – a working, ground-based version that helps the team hone, refine, and evaluate their design before they build the “real” arm destined for spaceflight.

This is the arm that NASA is planning to use for the OSAM-1 servicing mission.

All Crewed Missions

## On-orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing 1 (OSAM-1)

Proving Satellite Servicing Need extra gas or a tune-up for your satellite? For years, such services were outside the realm of possibility for most spacecraft. But now, one mission will...
Learn More
REVISED AGENDA*

 

NASA Advisory Council Science, Technology, 

Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)

Engagement Committee 

AGENDA 

May 2, 2019 

10:00 am – 3:30 pm ET

VIRTUAL MEETING

Webex and Call-In Information Below

11:00 Introduction to Meeting B. Girten

11:05 Opening Remarks by Chair A. Kennedy

11:10 STEM Education Advisory Panel Update M. Kincaid/ A. Kennedy/R. Mellado

 

11:25 Office of STEM Engagement (OSTEM) Updates M. Kincaid/K. Brown 

 Overview M. Kincaid

 Sparking Interest in STEM R. LaSalvia

12:00 National Space Council Meeting Update D. Dumbacher

12:15 Lunch All

1:15 Discuss/Finalize Findings and Recommendations Members

12:15 Adjourn Meeting B. Girten

For audio, please be sure to use the phone number and participant passcode. Use webex to see the slides.

844–467–6272 or toll access number 720–259–6462, and then the participant passcode: 423307 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx link is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=mbf68ae42d1f1a8e144866521f81e03df

The WebEx meeting number is 909 063 505 and the password is NACStem2$ (case sensitive)

*Original Agenda was revised to this abbreviated agenda due to some recent and anticipated changes

that are expected to impact formulation of findings and recommendations. An additional meeting of 

this Committee will be scheduled toward end of the month to finalize findings and recommendations.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

MARCH 17, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100442 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN H. COLEMAN, APP

2. ED100757 KERRY M. HOGAN, APP V STATE OF MO, RES

3. ED100871 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TIMOTHY JONES, APP

4. ED100883 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PIOTR CHORAZY, APP

5. ED101061 MICHAEL L. DARE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

6. ED101150 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V NICHOLAS GOETZ, APP

7. ED101431 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDREW MOORE, APP

8. ED101533 NANCY DARROW, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

9. ED101607 COVERALL RESTORATION, RES V KATHLEEN TURNER, 

APP

CORRECTION(S):

1. ED101743 IN THE INTEREST OF: V.C.N.C.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2114 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2114

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                          State of New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2004

 Mr. Bingaman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
  the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 
                          State of New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN NEW MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860C-1(b) of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 241 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 
and Modernization Act of 2003, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) No cca areas within new mexico.--A CCA area shall not 
        include an MSA any portion of which is within the State of New 
        Mexico.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68351-68352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-1890-000]


Camp Reed Wind Park, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Camp Reed Wind Park, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 68352]]

dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2949780919dbcbebbbcb781a7a2a2bda0a692b4b7a0b1fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ccac9decfc3e2e0e5e2e9dff9fcfce3fef8cceae9feefa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27958 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John C. Batty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 13, 2007   
|                       
|/s/ JOHN C. BATTY      
|John C. Batty          
|Chief Financial Officer
#### R. J. Park *v.*B. L. Price.

Writing — Parol Evidence — Fraud or Mistake.

Parol evidence is not admissible to vary tbe terms or import of a -writing, unless it is alleged that there was fraud or mistake in the execution thereof.

APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

*Turner & Smith, for appellant.*

*•Chenault & McOreary, for appellee.*

December 7, 1866.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

It is a well-settled principle that parol evidence is not admissible to vary the terms or import of a writing, unless it is alleged in the pleadings that there was fraud or mistake in the execution thereof. This principle is so well established that citation of authorities cannot be necessary.

As appellant’s answer did not contain the necessary allegations to admit the parol evidence, it was properly rejected.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14138 and #14139]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of CALIFORNIA dated 10/01/2014. *Incident:*
                         Boles Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         09/15/2014 and continuing.
 DATES: Effective Date: 10/01/2014. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/01/2014. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/01/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Siskiyou. *Contiguous Counties:* California: Del Norte; Humboldt; Modoc; Shasta; Trinity. Oregon: Jackson; Josephine; Klamath. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.063Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14138 5 and for economic injury is 14139 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, Oregon. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 1, 2014. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2014-23975 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Radware Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Meir Moshe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 24, 2011




/s/ Meir MosheMeir MosheChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)