alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-19-00604-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IRMA GARCIA ELIZONDO, Appellant,

v.

SHERLOCK REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant, Irma Garcia Elizondo, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by 

the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-19-4180-

E. This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss for 

mootness because there is no longer an issue in controversy. Appellant requests that 

this Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the

12th day of December, 2019.
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-122885) pertaining to the Coastal Banking Company, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and (b) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-129223) pertaining to the Coastal Banking Company, Inc. / First Capital Bank Holding Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan our report dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coastal Banking Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coastal Banking Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.





/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC



Albany, Georgia

March 14, 2008
#### IN RE: HERSCHEL KOZLOV, ESQ.

June 13, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See *156 N. J. Super. 316)*
Exhibit 10.0



                 Description of Arrangement

In May 2001, Luis Leon accepted an offer to become the Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, effective July  2,  2001.
The  terms  of Mr. Leon's employment include: 1)  an  annual
salary   of  $325,000;  2)  eligibility  for  the  Executive
Incentive Plan, with a guaranteed minimum bonus in  2001  of
$162,500,  which  is  normally  paid  out  in  March  of the
following year if employment is not terminated for cause; 3)
inclusion in the Company's Long Term Incentive Plan, with  a
cash  component  of  $300,000 and a stock  option  level  of
200,000  options  in accordance with the plan  document;  4)
eligibility  for the Company's Change of Control  agreement;
5)  relocation  reimbursement; 6) annual car and  perquisite
allowances  commencing as of January 1,  2001  and  totaling
$43,500;  and 6) participation in other applicable  employee
benefit plans.  Consistent with Company employment policies,
Mr.  Leon's  employment was contingent upon drug  screening,
background   investigation,   and   the   signing    of    a
confidentiality agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              13,592
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      145,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,951
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   164,615
<PP&E>                                             115,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                      78,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     284,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              141,250
<BONDS>                                            129,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,016
<OTHER-SE>                                          (2,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       284,337
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   133,985
<CGS>                                              104,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      119,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                                

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.18

[BLOCKBUSTER LOGO APPEARS HERE]


                                  MEMORANDUM

                                                                   CONFIDENTIAL

TO:             Joe Phillips

FROM:           Steve Becker

DATE:           June 22, 1998

SUBJECT:        Retention Agreement

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe,

Per your discussions with Bill Roskin and John Antioco, the following items
represented the full agreement regarding your employment with Blockbuster.

Salary (see new contract)
-------------------------

 .  Move your base salary from $318,000 to $365,000 retro to January 1, 1998.
 .  STIP remains at 50% of base salary.
 .  Guarantee of no less than $20,000 salary increase annually for term of
   contract.

Contract (see new contract)
---------------------------

 .  New 3-1/2 year employment contract starting on January 1, 1998 and ending on
   June 30, 2001.

Retention
---------

 .  A three-year retention plan (1999, 2000, 2001) as noted below

                     ---------------------------------------------------------
                     |                           YEAR                        |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  Incentive Amount  |    6 / 1999      |      6 / 2000    |    6 / 2001     |
|--------------------|------------------|------------------|-----------------|
|      $ 50,000      |    $ 50,000*     |                  |                 |
|--------------------|------------------|------------------|-----------------|
|      $ 50,000      |                  |      $ 50,000    |                 |
|--------------------|------------------|------------------|-----------------|
|      $ 50,000      |                  |                  |    $ 50,000     |
|--------------------|------------------|------------------|-----------------|
|      $150,000      |    $ 50,000      |      $ 50,000    |    $ 50,000     |
|--------------------|------------------|------------------|-----------------|

Approach:
--------

Award payout determined as follows:

 .  60% retention - payout if person is in "good standing"
 .  40% accomplishment of key objectives (year 2K, IS strategic plan, etc.)

Note:
----

 .  *Company agrees to make June, 1999 payment of $30,000 early (June, 1998)
   resulting in $20,000 payments in 1999.

Joe, please let me know if you have any questions.
Lyndon B. Johnson 

Space Center

April 2024

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Vanessa E. Wyche

Director Stephen A. Koerner

Deputy Director

Donna M. Shafer

Associate Director

Douglas A. Terrier

Associate Director for

Vision and Strategy

OA1

Dana J. Weigel

Manager, 

International Space 

Station Program

VA2

Richard S. Jones

Deputy Manager, 

Commercial 

Crew Program

UA

Angela T. Hart

Manager,

Commercial Low 

Earth Orbit Program

SA2

David K. Baumann 

Director, 

Human Research 

Program

GA1

Howard C. Hu

Manager, 

Orion Program

MA1

Jon B. Olansen 

Manager, 

Gateway Program

DA1

Lara E. Kearney

Manager, 

EVA & Human Surface 

Mobility Program

CA

Norman D. Knight

Director,

Flight Operations

EA

Julie Kramer White

Director,

Engineering

NA

Wllie Lyles

Director,

Safety and 

Mission Assurance

SA

Michelle A. Frieling 

Director,

Human Health and 

Performance

FA

Ven C. Feng 

Director,

Exploration Operations 

Office

XA

Burt A. Laws

Director,

Exploration Architecture, 

Integration, and Science

RA

Jason E. Noble

Director,

White Sands Test Facility

JA

Joel B. Walker

Director, 

Center Operations

LA1

Sidney H. Schmidt

Chief Financial Officer

BA1

Bradley J. Niese

Acting Director,

Procurement

IA1

Troy P. LeBlanc

Chief 

Information Officer

AD

Arturo Sanchez III

Director,

External Relations

AL1

Randall T. Suratt

Acting Chief Counsel

AH1

Daniel P. Costello 

Director,

Human Capital

AJ1

Regina Neal-Mujahid

Director, 

Diversity and 

Equal Opportunity 

AA2

Nicholas G. Skytland

Director, 

Busines Development and 

Technology Integration 

Office 

1 Direct Reports to Headquarters

2 Host Center/PM at KSC
3 min read

# NASA to Highlight Science on Next Resupply Mission to Space Station

### NASA

Nov 21, 2017

MEDIA ADVISORYM17-138

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credits: NASA**

NASA will host a media teleconference at 1 p.m. EST Wednesday, Nov. 29, to discuss a number of science investigations and instruments launching to the International Space Station on the next SpaceX commercial resupply mission.

SpaceX is targeting no earlier than Dec. 4 for the launch of its Dragon spacecraft on a Falcon 9 rocket from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida.

Kirt Costello, deputy chief scientist for the International Space Station Program at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, and Mike Roberts, deputy chief scientist at the Center of Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), will kick off the call with an overview of the research and technology aboard Dragon. Also participating in the briefing will be:
            - Andrew Rush, president and chief executive officer, Made in Space, will discuss its  Fiber Optics  payload, which will test manufacturing fiber optic filaments in a microgravity environment. This could lead to production of higher-quality fiber optic products both in space and on Earth.
            - Brian Hess, chief executive officer, and Grayson Allen, chief financial officer, both of LaunchPad Medical, will discuss an investigation using  synthetic bone material  to accelerate bone repair.
            - Dong Wu, project scientist at the NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Peter Pilewskie, lead scientist at the University of Colorado, Boulder, will discuss NASA’s  Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor  (TSIS), a new instrument launching to station that will measure the Sun’s energy input to Earth.
            - Joseph Hamilton, principal investigator, NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, will discuss the  Space Debris Sensor , an external tool which will measure the orbital debris environment around the space station.
            - Yasaman Shirazi, mission scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, California, will discuss an investigation testing drug delivery systems for  combatting muscle breakdown  in microgravity.

To participate in the teleconference, media must contract Cheryl Warner at 202-358-1100 or cheryl.m.warner@nasa.gov by 5 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 28, for dial-in information.

Audio of the teleconference will be streamed live online at:

-end-

Cheryl WarnerHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100cheryl.m.warner@nasa.gov
Exhibit 13.1

Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officers of Trintech Group PLC (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Cyril McGuireCYRIL MCGUIREChief Executive Officer/s/ Joseph SeeryJOSEPH SEERYVice President Finance, Group


Dated: May 29, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure to this statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Trintech Group PLC and will be retained by Trintech Group PLC and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SYLVESTER COLEMAN.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. .
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00192

- CR

RASHUN DEONTA WILLIAMS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No. CR02883

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, p assport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper for m or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 2 8 , 2020
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 26, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: MIKEAL GLENN STINE,

Petitioner.

No. 10-1306

(D.C. No. 1:10-CV-01652-BNB)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Mikeal Glenn Stine, a pro se prisoner, filed an Emergency Petition for Writ

of Mandamus, asking this court to direct the district court to issue an injunction

against his transfer by the Bureau of Prisons to a particular prison unit and to

order the district court to “immediately address” his claims by holding an

evidentiary hearing. Mr. Stine alleges that his transfer to the other prison unit is

imminent. He claims the transfer will put his life in jeopardy because members of

a gang who have previously threatened his life are housed in that unit.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy “to be invoked only in extraordinary

situations.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 34 (1980). “For

mandamus to issue, there must be a clear right to the relief sought, a plainly

defined and peremptory duty on the part of respondent to do the action in

question, and no other adequate remedy available. Petitioner must also show that

Appellate Case: 10-1306 Document: 01018463508 Date Filed: 07/26/2010 Page: 1
-2-

his right to the writ is clear and indisputable.” Johnson v. Rogers, 917 F.2d 1283,

1285 (10th Cir. 1990) (citation and quotation omitted).

Mr. Stine has not established that his right to mandamus relief is clear and

indisputable. He fails to show that the district court has a plainly defined and

peremptory duty to do the actions in question. While the district court has not yet

ruled on his motion seeking an injunction against his transfer to a different prison

unit, it has not “persistently and without reason refuse[d] to adjudicate a case

properly before it.” State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Scholes, 601 F.2d 1151,

1154 (10th Cir. 1979) (quotations omitted).

Mr. Stine’s request to proceed before this court without prepayment of

costs and fees is GRANTED. His petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1306 Document: 01018463508 Date Filed: 07/26/2010 Page: 2
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters 

Washington, DC 20546-0001

January 13, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Artemis I 

Reception: From Liftoff to Splashdown. 

On January 17, 2023, Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed Martin”), The Boeing Company 

(“Boeing”), Northrop Grumman Corporation (“Northrop Grumman”), Aerojet Rocketdyne 

(“Aerojet”), and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Jacobs”) will host a reception at Royal Sands 

Social Club, 26 N. St. SE, Washington, DC 20003, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The event will

provide a forum for a diverse group of Artemis I Launch attendees to connect, network, and 

disseminate information on ongoing activities and discuss matters of interest. 

Over 300 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of views or interests 

and will include Nasa personnel, National Space Council, the Office of Science and Technology 

Policy, OMB, House and Senate Members and staff, Artemis I Industry partners, professional 

society representatives, trade associations, educational NGOs, advocacy groups and consultants. 

The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is $38.00 per person. I have 

determined that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event because it 

will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange information, ideas and views 

pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsors may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In 

those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that 

the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only attend the event if they reimburse the sponsors the 

value of the event.1

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Aerojet, and Jacobs, such as 

procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act 

Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether 

they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone

1 NASA employees who are scheduled to speak at the reception may accept free attendance for themselves and 

one invited guest pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.203(b)(8)(i) and (iii).
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry
A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Larry A. Goldstone
-------------------------
Larry A. Goldstone
President and Chief Operating Officer
August 9, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE: HILDA KILIJIAN IRREVOCABLE TRUST PETITION OF: LYNNE BOGHOSSIAN : : : : : No. 65 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 13, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JAMES VIEHL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-4061

(D.C. No. 2:09-CR-00119-DB-1)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the “Appellant’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss

Appeal.” The motion is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b) and 10th Cir R 46.3(B).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4061 Document: 01018455844 Date Filed: 07/13/2010 Page: 1