alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, (theReport), I,
William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ William P. Hales
William P. Hales
President and Chief
Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

August 15, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Michael P. Hoopis, certify that:

1.                                       I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 toTransition Report on Form 10-K of Water Pik Technologies, Inc.;

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: March 18, 2005 |   | By:    |   | /s/ MICHAEL P. HOOPIS     |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|                 |   |   |   | Michael P. Hoopis         |
|                 |   |   |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1044V

UNPUBLISHED

LEE ANN WELLERRITTER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: January 19, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Dhairya Divyakant Jani, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On July 18, 2019, Lee Ann Wellerritter filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

October 1, 2018 caused her to develop a left shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (SIRVA). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 19, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, it is Respondent’s position that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation. Id. at 6. 

Respondent further agrees that Petitioner “had no history of pain, inflammation, or 

dysfunction in her left shoulder; her pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 

hours of her receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; her symptoms were limited to the 

shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality

was identified to explain her symptoms.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                     701,770
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            2,033,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          96,504,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                              59,247,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            96,504,538
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        10,730,959
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         7,226,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            55,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       1,461,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          1,987,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      1,987,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                             1,987,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2098

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 

reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian 

through a federally-qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 

care system. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2004

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

100 percent reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian through a federally-qualified 

health center or a Native Hawaiian health care system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native Hawaiian Med5 icaid Coverage Act of 2004’’. 
2

•S 2098 IS 

1 SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 

2 PROVIDED TO A NATIVE HAWAIIAN THROUGH 

3 A FEDERALLY-QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER 

4 OR A NATIVE HAWAIIAN HEALTH CARE SYS5 TEM UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM. 

6 (a) MEDICAID.—The third sentence of section 

7 1905(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) 

8 is amended by inserting ‘‘, and with respect to medical 

9 assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian (as defined in 

10 section 12 of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improve11 ment Act) through a federally-qualified health center or 

12 a Native Hawaiian health care system (as so defined) 

13 whether directly, by referral, or under contract or other 

14 arrangement between a federally-qualified health center or 

15 a Native Hawaiian health care system and another health 

16 care provider’’ before the period. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section applies to medical assistance provided on or 

19 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### IN THE MATTER OF JORGE M. DUMOIS, DECEASED.

May *2,*1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50792.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 22, 2003.

Diane D. Kirstein, Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM *

Defendant-Appellant Jaime Navarro-Gutierrez (“Navarro”) appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He argues that the district court erred in denying a motion to suppress. Navarro was stopped by an experienced border patrol agent who noticed that the vehicle, like those frequently used in immigration schemes, was traveling in an area known for smuggling incidents very near the Mexican border in a manner that invited suspicion. When viewed in the totality of the circumstances, these facts demonstrate that the Border Patrol agents had a reasonable suspicion, which justified their making the stop. Thus, the court correctly denied Navarro’s suppression motion. *See United States v. Espinosa-Alvarado,*302 F.3d 304, 305-06 (5th Cir.2002). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF ACTING PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Denis Corin, the Acting Principal Accounting Officer of TapImmune Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  TapImmune Inc.Date: April 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Denis CorinDenis CorinPresident, Chief Financial Officer, Acting Principal Officer and a director
**Exhibit 10.3.44**SUMMARY OF SALARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERSSalary arrangements for the following executive officers of the Company, as part of arrangementsrelated to their respective employment contracts with the Company, are described in the followingExhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006, all of which areincorporated herein by reference:   Gregory T. Novak Exhibit 10.3.42Ronald E. Salluzzo Exhibit 10.3.41Leonard R. Bayer Exhibit 10.3.39David B. Vaden Exhibit 10.3.36George Terhanian Exhibit 10.3.45On September 12, 2006, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved base salaries in the followingamounts for the following executive officers, effective October 2, 2006:      Dee T. Allsop $275,000 Dennis K. Bhame $205,000 Arthur E. Coles $270,000 Eric Narowski $155,000 Mr. Allsop’s salary was increased. His prior salary arrangement was covered by a Letter Agreementdated September 9, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.3.18 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended June 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference, and modified by an arrangement filed asExhibit 10.3.33 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 andincorporated herein by reference.Mr. Bhame received a salary increase and Mr. Coles’s salary remains unchanged. Their previoussalary arrangements were described in Exhibit 10.3.33 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. Their respective salaries are paidunder unwritten arrangements subject to modification from time to time at the sole discretion ofthe Compensation Committee.Mr. Narowski’s salary is paid under an unwritten arrangement subject to modification from time totime at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.Cashbonus payouts for fiscal 2006 under the Company’s CorporateBonus Plan and Business Unit Bonus Plan for the Company’sexecutive officers who are not “named executive officers”included:      Dee Allsop $57,711 Dennis Bhame $42,045 Eric Narowski $16,818 GeorgeTerhanian $34,462 Cash bonus arrangements for fiscal 2007 for the Company’s executive officers except Mr. Narowskiare described in Exhibit 10.3.40 on this Annual Report on Form 10-K, incorporated herein byreference. On September 12, 2006, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved a target bonus forMr. Narowski of $20,000.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2000

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2004

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Armed Services, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

AN ACT

To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer 

research for 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2000 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR 

2 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

3 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

Passed the Senate December 9, 2003. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credit Fund IiI, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 9, 2009
NO. 07-08-0297-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

NOVEMBER 25, 2008

______________________________

VICENTE CASAS, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 140 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; TH

NO. 2005-411,025; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant, Vicente Casas, appeals his conviction for the offense of burglary of a

habitation with intent to commit a felony and sentence of 50 years confinement in the

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We abate for further

proceedings.
-2-

Appellant's brief was due to be filed no later than October 13, 2008, but has yet to

be filed. Appellant’s attorney of record was notified by letter dated October 23 that unless

a brief or motion was received by November 3rd, this court would abate the appeal to the

trial court. On November 7, appellate counsel filed a motion to extend time to file

appellant’s brief requesting until November 10 to file appellant’s almost completed brief.

On November 13, appellant’s attorney was notified that his motion for extension was

denied and that appellant’s brief was due on or before November 18. Appellant’s counsel

has not filed a brief or had further communication with this court.

Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following: 

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether the trial court appointed counsel for appellant has abandoned

the appeal; and

3. whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel

given the attorney’s failure to file a brief.

 The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant does want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also

take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of

counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel
-3-

shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a

supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included

in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and

the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by December 23, 2008.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2034

To establish 3 memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia in the State of 

Texas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2004

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To establish 3 memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia 

in the State of Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Columbia Space Shut5 tle Memorials Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MEMORIAL.—The term ‘‘memorial’’ means 

9 each of the memorials to the Space Shuttle Colum10 bia established by section 3(a). 
2

•S 2034 IS 

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di3 rector of the National Park Service. 

4 SEC. 3. MEMORIALS TO THE SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There are established as 

6 units of the National Park System 3 memorials to the 

7 Space Shuttle Columbia to be located on the 3 parcels of 

8 land in the State described in subsection (b) on which 

9 large debris from the Space Shuttle Columbia was recov10 ered. 

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of land re12 ferred to in subsection (a) are—

13 (1) the parcel of land owned by the Fredonia 

14 Corporation, located at the southeast corner of the 

15 intersection of E. Hospital Street and N. Fredonia 

16 Street, Nacogdoches, Texas; 

17 (2) the parcel of land owned by Temple Inland 

18 Inc., located 10 acres of a 61-acre tract bounded by 

19 State Highway 83 and Bayou Bend Road, Hemphill, 

20 Texas; and 

21 (3) the parcel of land owned by the city of 

22 Lufkin, Texas, located at City Hall Park, 301 

23 Charlton Street, Lufkin, Texas. 

24 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The memorials shall be ad25 ministered by the Secretary. 
3

•S 2034 IS 

1 (d) ADDITIONAL SITES.—The Secretary may rec2 ommend to Congress additional sites in the State of Texas 

3 related to the Space Shuttle Columbia for establishment 

4 as memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia. 

5 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

7 this Act $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, to remain avail8 able until expended.

Æ