1994 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-7-1994 

# U nit ed S t a t es v

. O ne 1973 R ol l s R o y ce

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 93-1417

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1994 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U nit e d S t a t e s v

. One 1973 R o l l s R o y c e " (1994). 1994 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 211. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994/211UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________ NO. 93-1417

____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee

v. ONE 1973 ROLLS ROYCE, V.I.N. SRH-16266, (by and through Claimant Oscar B. Goodman), Appellant

________________________________ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL

DEFENSE LAWYERS,
Amicus-curiae

________________________________________________________ On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civ. No. 90-01487)

________________________________________________________

Argued: December 6, 1993 Before: BECKER, NYGAARD, and WEIS, Circuit Judges
.

Opinion Filed: November 25, 1994

MICHAEL R. STILES United States Attorney WALTER S. BATTY, JR. Assistant U.S. Attorney Chief of Appeals JOEL M. FRIEDMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney FRANK A. LABOR, III (ARGUED) Assistant U.S. Attorney 615 Chestnut StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19106

Attorneys for Appellee United States of America DAVID CHESNOFF, ESQUIRE (ARGUED) Goodman & Chesnoff 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 STEPHEN STEIN, ESQUIRE 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 ROBERT E. MURDOCK, ESQUIRE Murdock & Palazzo 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Appellant One 1973 Rolls Royce VIN SRH-16266

PETER GOLDBERGER, ESQ. (ARGUED) 50 Rittenhouse Place Ardmore, PA 19003-2276 Attorney for Amicus-curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

__________________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION

__________________________ The opinion in the above-captioned case filed November 25, 1994, is amended as follows: 1. On page 4, the beginning second sentence should
read as follows: Nicodemo Scarfo, Sr., a co-defendant of Goodman's

former clients (and at one time . . .)2. On page 9, first paragraph after Section IIA, the

date should be January 1986. 3. On page 11, first full paragraph, delete the word "unexpected" on the first line. In the second paragraph, on the first line replace "Eventually" with "Meanwhile," and add the word "had" before convinced. In the last sentence, replace the phrase "counter-surveillance equipment" with "surveillance devices." 4. On page 29 within footnote 17, last paragraph, in penultimate sentence, add the word "absolute" before "Sixth
Amendment." 5. On page 36, in the paragraph after the indentation, in the first sentence, replace "any one" with "either."
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward R. Becker Circuit Judge

DATED: December 7, l994