alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-10-030]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

October 26, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 205-2000.                    

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1174 and 1175 (Final)(Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from China and Mexico)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 8, 2010.)

5. Outstanding action jackets:

(1) Document No. GC-10-161 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-413 (Certain Rare-Earth Magnets and Magnetic Materials and Articles Containing Same).

                        (2) Document No. GC-10-184 concerning approval of annual                         **Federal Register**                         notice on investigations of APO and rules violations completed in calendar year 2009.                    

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: October 19, 2010.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2010-26816 Filed 10-20-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

# **CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, J.M. Haggar, III, Chief Executive Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                         | /s/ J.M. Haggar, III                      |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | J.M. Haggar, III, Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |
| Dated:  August 11, 2004 |

 

1

----
Exhibit 13.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Toyota Motor Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the “Company“), does hereby certify that, to such officer’s knowledge:
  1. The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2010, as amended by the accompanying Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A (the “Report“) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
/s/ Fujio ChoName:
Fujio ChoTitle:
Chairman of the BoardDate:
March 18, 2011
 By:
/s/ Satoshi OzawaName:
Satoshi OzawaTitle:
Executive Vice President, Member of the BoardDate:
March 18, 2011
    (A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Toyota Motor Corporation and will be retained by Toyota Motor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Our audits include the financial statement schedule in Item 14(a). This schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Water Pik Technologies, Inc. pertaining to the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-30016), Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-96447), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96449), Teledyne, Inc. 401(k)
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96451), 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-96455), Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-96457), Retirement Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-43962), 1999 Incentive Plan (Form
S-8 No. 333-54318) and Broad Based Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-54320) of
our report dated January 22, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland Hills, California
March 16, 2001
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2093

To maintain full marriage tax penalty relief for 2005. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. 

CHAMBLISS, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To maintain full marriage tax penalty relief for 2005.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage Penalty Re5 lief Extension Act of 2004’’.

6 SEC. 2. FULL ELIMINATION OF THE MARRIAGE PENALTY 

7 FOR 2005. 

8 (a) STANDARD DEDUCTION.—Paragraph (7) of sec9 tion 63(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

10 to applicable percentage) is amended by striking ‘‘174’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘200’’. 
2

•S 2093 IS 

1 (b) 15-PERCENT BRACKET.—Subparagraph (B) of 

2 section 1(f)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re3 lating to applicable percentage) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘180’’ and inserting ‘‘200’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2003. 

8 (d) APPLICATION OF EGTRRA SUNSET TO THIS

9 SECTION.—Each amendment made by this section shall 

10 be subject to title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax 

11 Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 to the same extent and 

12 in the same manner as the provision of such Act to which 

13 such amendment relates.

Æ
CASE NO. 12-14-00210-CR

BOBBIE GRUBBS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 APPELLANT §

§

VS. § TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

APPELLEE § TYLER, TEXAS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE MOTION FOR 

 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

 TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW The State of Texas , Appellee, by and through her District Attorney, Kenneth

B. Florence, and files this motion for leave to file a late motion for an extension of 30 days in which

to file the Appellee’s Brief. In support of this motion, Appellee shows the court the following:

I.

Appellant was convicted in the 273 Judicial District Court of Shelby County, Texas, by a rd

jury, of the offense of Capital Murder. The judge assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, for Life, without the possibility of Parole.

II.

The deadline for filing the Appellee’s Brief was July 3, 2015. That date was the official

observance of Independence Day and all county offices were closed. That date has passed.

 III.

Appellee’s request for an leave to file a late motion for extension of time is based upon the

following facts: 

1. Appellee can get the brief filed within the 30 days requested.

2. This motion is not opposed by defense counsel.

ACCEPTED

12-14-00210-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/9/2015 3:04:49 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/9/2015 3:04:49 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
3. This motion is the State’s first motion for an extension.

4. The elected District Attorney was the only attorney in the office for 4 years, and a new Assistant

District Attorney was just approved effective June 8, 2015.

 Wherefore, Appellee prays the court grant the motion for leave to late file this motion for

extension, the motion for extension, and extend the deadline for filing the Appellee’s Brief to 

August 7, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Kenneth B. Florence 

KENNETH B. FLORENCE

TBA # 00790698

Shelby County Assistant District Attorney

200 San Augustine Street Suite 12

Center, Texas 75935

(936) 598-2489

(936) 598-4106

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the State’s Motion for Leave to file a Late

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Brief, as related above, was served upon, Stephen

Shires, Attorney for Appellant, 123 San Augustine Street, Center, Texas 75935, by facsimile (936)

598-3031, on this the 7 day of July 2015. th

 /s/ Kenneth B. Florence 

KENNETH B. FLORENCE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         594,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  797,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,000
<INVENTORY>                                 35,847,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,292
<PP&E>                                      23,969,710
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,203,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,397,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,769,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,294,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,397,321
<SALES>                                    103,648,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           103,648,065
<CGS>                                       65,679,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,918,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             738,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,311,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,356,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,955,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,955,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

      ( print page 67721)    

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME: 

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on November 10, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A. Approval of Minutes

    - October 14, 2010

### B. New Business

    - Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—Disclosure to Shareholders and Investors on Senior Officer Compensation

## Closed Session*

### Reports

    - Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

Dated: October 28, 2010.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board

[FR Doc. 2010-27910 Filed 11-1-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
##### 



Rent Way, Inc.
Calculation of Reconciliation of Net Cash Used in Operations to EBITDA
Exhibit 99.1
For the Twelve-Months Ended June 30, 2006
(dollars in thousands)
 Net cash provided by operating activities
    
    $
    4,345Net cash used in discontinued operations
    
    
    113Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities
    
    
    (156,650
    )Changes in assets and liabilities
    
    
    162,002Depreciation and amortization
    
    
    15,194Interest expense
    
    
    30,005Income taxes
    
    
    5,612Adjustments per bank agreement
    
    
    (5,080
    )DPI EBITDA
    
    
    370Rent Way EBITDA
    
    $
    55,909
#### Alberto Gonzalez et al., Respondents, v 310 West 38th, L.L.C., Respondent, and Felise Garage Corp., Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 384]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 16, 2003, which, in an action by a laborer for personal injuries sustained when he fell from a ladder, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 23, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from, deemed appellant’s motion to renew and reargue to be one for reargument only, and so considered, denied the motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Appellant’s argument that it is the alter ego of plaintiff’s employer, and that the Workers’ Compensation Law therefore bars the action as against it, was correctly rejected by the motion court on the ground that the record fails to demonstrate that plaintiff’s employer exercised complete domination and control over appellant’s everyday operations *(see Allen v Oberdorfer Foundries,*192 AD2d 1077 [1993]; *Cruz v HSS Props. Corp.,*309 AD2d 720 [2003]). However, the record does conclusively demonstrate that plaintiff was engaged in the painting of a building when injured, and that he is therefore protected by Labor Law § 240 (1). We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                   (unaudited)


                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                           March 31,   March 31,
                                                              1998        1997
                                                           ---------   ---------

Net income                                                 $   9,762   $   7,813
                                                           =========   =========

Shares
Weighted average common shares outstanding                    34,600      34,364
Common equivalent shares                                          62          73
                                                           ---------   ---------

Weighted average common shares and common
    equivalent shares outstanding - Diluted                   34,662      34,437
                                                           =========   =========

Net income per share - Diluted                             $    0.28   $    0.23
                                                           =========   =========
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


Date: May 12, 2004                /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                  A signed  original of this  written  statement
                                  required by Section  906 has been  provided to
                                  CNL  Income  Fund  XIII,   Ltd.  and  will  be
                                  retained  by CNL Income  Fund XIII,  Ltd.  and
                                  furnished  to  the   Securities  and  Exchange
                                  Commission or its staff upon request.
NAC Aeronautics Committee Internal Agenda 

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 

NASA Langley Research Center 

5 Langley Blvd 

Hampton, Virginia 23681 

Bldg 2101, Room 300H 

Tuesday, July 29 (Sessions are public except as noted)
�

8:00 am to 8:10 am Welcome and announcements
�

8:10 am to 9:15 am ARMD Strategic Implementation Plan
�

9:15 am to 10:00 am Low Carbon Propulsion Strategic Thrust 

Overview 

10:00 am to 12:00 pm Advanced Composites Project Review and 

Discussion 

12:00 pm to 1:00 pm Lunch (non-public)
�

1:00 pm to 2:00 pm NRC Autonomy Study Final Report
�

2:00 pm to 2:30 pm Committee Deliberations
�

2:30 pm to 2:45 pm Public Comment Period
�

2:45 PM Adjourn
�
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I., 

 Appellant 

 v. 

JOHN WETZEL, JAMEY LUTHER, 

EDWARD EVENS, DONALD GELMANN, 

BILL MAILMAN, 

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 EAP 2015 

Appeal from the Memorandum and 

Order of Commonwealth Court dated 

February 12, 2015 at No. 453 M.D. 

2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar Radwan, Also Known as Radwan Omar, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 877]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered August 2, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 372 to 7 years, and judgment, same court (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered October 17, 2002, convicting him, after a jury trial, of petit larceny, and sentencing him to a concurrent term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

At defendant’s first trial, he was convicted of petit larceny but the jury was unable to reach a verdict as to burglary. On retrial, defendant was convicted of burglary.

At the first trial, the court properly denied defendant’s application made under *Batson v Kentucky*(476 US 79 [1986]), since defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of intentional discrimination *(see People v Brown,*97 NY2d 500, 507-508 [2002]). The record is clear that the court made only a step-one ruling.

At defendant’s second trial, the court’s charge, taken as a whole *(see People v Samuels,*99 NY2d 20, 25-26 [2002]), stated the correct legal principles, including the People’s obligation to prove that defendant knew that his entry was unlawful *(see*
      *447
      *People v Basch,*36 NY2d 154, 159 [1975]). Furthermore, the court made it clear that the credibility of defendant’s assertion that he believed his entry to be lawful was a question for the jury. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.