alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         285,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,262,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,750,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,468,000
<PP&E>                                         413,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,153,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,881,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,750,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,925,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,192,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,881,000
<SALES>                                      1,701,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,701,000
<CGS>                                        1,405,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,425,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (751,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (751,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (751,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIK GUMMINGER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 12 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of UNR Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Iuriy Vladimirovich Shevchenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Iuriy Vladimirovich ShevchenkoIuriy Vladimirivich Shevchenko

Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2011








[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UNR Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by UNR Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### DONALD CAIN AND ANTHONY FABRO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*245)
#### J. & E. v. M. & F.

May 30, 1978.

Petitions for certification denied. (See 157 *N. J. Super.*478)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|Dated:  August 12, 2005 | /s/ John E. YetterJohn E. YetterVice President
     and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 24, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00378

- CV

In the Matter of R. T.

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

AFFIRM ED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on May 3, 2013 . Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ argu ments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Coleman J. Clougherty, President & Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Coleman J. Clougherty              
|Coleman J. Clougherty                  
|President & Principal Executive Officer

August 9, 2005
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Compas Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Celestin, Karven, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Naim M. Peress, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Cheree A. Buggs, J.), entered June 18, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order which denied its motion for summary judgment and granted a cross motion by defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Since plaintiff and its assignor were aware of the identity of the owner of the vehicle in which the assignor had been a passenger at the time of the accident, plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against the vehicle's owner before seeking relief from MVAIC (<i>see Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co.</i>, 244 AD2d 528 [1997]; <a href="../2008/2008_52586.htm" target="_blank"><i>Modern Art Med., P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 22 Misc 3d 126</a>[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52586[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2008]; <a href="../2008/2008_52453.htm" target="_blank"><i>Doctor Liliya Med., P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 21 Misc 3d 143</a>[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52453[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2008]). Here, plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies against the owner of the vehicle.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 27, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-86479 ) of eSAFETYWORLD, Inc. (the "Company") pertaining to the
Company's  Stock Option Plan,  of our report dated October 26, 2001 with respect
to our audit of the financial statements of the Company appearing in this Annual
Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  year  ended  June  30,  2001,  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ EICHLER BERGSMAN & CO., LLP
    ----------------------------


New York, New York
October 29, 2001
TERESITA DE JESUS ABREU,

Petitioner,

v.

RIVERLAND ELEMENTARY 

SCHOOL and BROWARD 

SCHOOL BOARD,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-3882

Opinion filed November 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of – Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Goldstein of Jose M. Francisco, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

Raymond L. Grant of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DISMISSED.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT KAISER.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Robert Elliott *v.*Sarah Spencer.

"Widow’s Verbal Contract to Relinquish Dower Not Binding — Return of Consideration— Special Verdict.

A married woman is not bound by her verbal contract to relinquish her dower, but had a right to abandon it.

■Same.

No title to the property paid her in consideration of her relinquishment vested in her. She had no right to abandon the contract and still claim the property.

APPEAL PROM CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT COURT.

. *Sandidge &*Hays, *for appellant.*

*Tan Winkle, for appellee.*

January 31, 1867.

Opinion op the Ooubt by

Judge Williams:

The only two witnesses in the case prove that when Elliott "bought the land from appellee’s deceased husband she then verbally agreed to relinquish her right of dower in consideration •of the mare and oxen which appellant delivered to her. The husband died before she signed or acknowledged the deed, whereupon she asserted her dower and obtained it by decree of court.

The jury, by their special verdict, substantially found those facts, but, notwithstanding, the court dismissed appellant’s suit brought to recover the mare and oxen and turned him over to a suit against the insolvent estate of her deceased husband.

The judge evidently regarded the property as vesting in the husband and that she was entitled to it as widow, but this was an erroneous view; she being a married woman was not bound by her verbal contract to relinquish her dower, but had a right to abandon it, and, having done so, no title to the property paid her in consideration for her relinquishment vested in her, but it should have been returned; she was not entitled to abandon the contract and still claim the property by virtue of it. It would have been proper, had the pleadings justified it, to have laid her under terms in the suit seeking her dower, but this not having been done Elliott had a right to sue for the property. The judgment is reversed, with directions to the court to render judgment for -appellant on the special finding of the jury.
Exhibit 4.45
  SINA CORPORATION
2007 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AGREEMENT
 MM DD,
YYYY SINA Corporation Employee AA
  Restricted Share Units XXX
 Vesting of Restricted Share Units MM DD, YYYY
 Termination of Service
 Settlement of Restricted Share Units
 Withholding Taxes




---



##### 



Tax Advice
 Non-Transferability of Restricted Share Units
 Restriction on Transfer
 Share Certificate Restrictive Legends
 Representations, Warranties, Covenants, and Acknowledgments
 Voting and Other Rights
 No Employment Rights
 2




---



##### 



Notices
 Entire Agreement; Enforcement of Rights
 Governing Law
 Arbitration
 Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 3




---



##### 



Counterparts
  (Signature Page Follows)
 4




---



##### 



DD MM,
YYYY.
 SINA CORPORATION
 By:
    
    (Signature)Name:Title:
    
    President & CEO
 RECIPIENT:
 Name:
    
    Employee AABy:(Signature)Address:
 Telephone
Number:Email Address:
 5
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2017

To designate the United States courthouse and post office building located 

at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́

United States Courthouse and Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2004

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse and post office 

building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse 

and Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE ́ UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 

4 AND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 and post office building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

7 Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated as the 
2

•S 2017 IS 

1 ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

5 States to the courthouse and post office building referred 

6 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

7 the Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Of8 fice Building.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification Of Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Martin J. Leestma, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of
my knowledge:  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Retek Inc. /s/ MARTIN J. LEESTMA
Martin J. Leestma
Chief Executive Officer I, Gregory A. Effertz, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of
my knowledge:  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Retek Inc. /s/ GREGORY A. EFFERTZ
Gregory A. Effertz
Senior Vice President ,
Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
**Rule 13a-14(a)[Section 302] Certification for Form 10-K/A (CEO)**
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Yan Wang, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of SINA Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release33-8238.]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
/s/ Yan Wang
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David J. Mickelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: May 16, 2005

                                           BY: /s/  David J. Mickelson
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                    David J. Mickelson
                                                    Executive Vice President,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    and Chief Operating Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees from the Blockson Chemical Company, Joliet, Illinois, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On September 3, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at the Blockson Chemical Company in Joliet, Illinois from March 1, 1951 to June 30, 1960, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on October 3, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on October 3, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can                               ( print page 67365)                            also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-27595 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
C.J. 

clerk of this court shall transfer all documents filed in Docket No. 60331 to 

Docket No. 61383. 

Further, the filing fee paid in Docket No. 60331 shall be 

applied to Docket No. 61383. Accordingly, appellant's motion for 

reconsideration in Docket No. 61383 is granted and that appeal is 

reinstated. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Zachary B. Coughlin 

Richard G. Hill, Chartered 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A