alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
: \
National Aeronautics and Space Administration CZ.
: “RTEMIS~

§ SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE STORY §

THE ADVENTURES oF

PART 3:
Campos Returns to Earth

When we last saw Commander
Moonikin Campos, along with phantoms
Zohar and Helga, they had orbited the
Moon in the Orion spacecraft. Now, a
precisely-timed series of engine firings
has put them on the path home.

ADIOSITO,
MI LUNA.

When they speed through Earth's
atmosphere at a max speed of about
25,000 miles (40,200 km) per hour, Orion’s
heat shield will protect Campos and friends

from temperatures half as hot as the
surface of the Sun — nearly 5,000 degrees
Fahrenheit (2,760 degrees Celsius).

Click here
to learn about
Orion's heat
shield!

As the capsule careens toward the
Pacific Ocean, Campos, Zohar, and
Helga thank their lucky stars that
Orion is equipped with innovative
safety features to keep them secure
during the splashdown landing.

WE ARE
DEFINITELY
GOING OVER
THE SPEED
LIMIT!

Above Earth’s surface, a series of
parachutes drastically reduces Orion's
speeds, bringing the spacecraft and
its passengers down to a breezy 20
miles (32 km) per hour.

And as Orion splashes down off the

coast of California, built-in shock
absorbers in Campos’ seat, and the
crew cabin itself, lessen the impact.

It might be a bumpy ride, but
our heroes handle it bravely,
knowing the data they've
gathered will ensure the vehicle
is safe for future astronauts.

NICE WORK,
EVERYBODY! SAFE
AND SOUND.

After they've splashed down,
NASA and U.S. Navy and Air Force
teams will collect the capsule from
the ocean. Campos, Zohar, and
Helga will stay in place inside the
cabin as it is transported back to
NASA facilities for processing.

NASA scientists and engineers
will analyze all of the data that
Campos and his pals gathered.
The data will prepare us for
Artemis Il, NASA's first Artemis

HOW DO flight test with human crew.
YOU THINK
WE DID?

H
ie kat

BEEP BOOP

NASA has big plans for future missions
to deep space, but will our intrepid heroes
travel to the cosmos once more? That, for

the moment, must remain a question
without an answer. As for now, the team is
taking a break from their adventures to
celebrate their good work.

YOU DID IT,
CAMPOS!

NO,
HELGA...
WE DID IT.

IT FEELS
GOOD KNOWING
WE HELPED MAKE

THIS POSSIBLE.

Thanks to their heroic efforts,
Campos, Zohar, and Helga have secured
their legacy as the first manikins to fly
around the Moon.

They paved the way forward as we
prepare to return to the Moon...

and venture on to Mars.

The End.

OR 1S IT?

www.nasa.gov/artemis
#### PAUL R. KNOLLMEYER v. RUDCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 154 *N. J. Super.*309)
# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-7083 September Term, 2024 1: 24-c v -003 53-UNA Filed O n: Sep tem ber 4 , 20 24 Matth ew Jones,

App ellant v . Centra l District Statio n,

App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas, P an, an d Ga rcia, Circuit Jud ges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P
. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder da ted Ap ril 25, 2 024 , be af f irmed . T he district cou rt prop erly dism issed t he case as f rivolou s be cause the com plaint ’s allegation s lacked an arguab le ba sis in law or fact. Se e Neitzke v. W illiams, 490 U.S. 319 , 32 5 (19 89); see also 2 8 U.S .C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i)(providing that “th e court shall d ismiss th e ca se a t an y tim e if the cou rt de term ines t hat
. . . th e a ction or app eal .
. . is f rivolou s or m alicious”). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution

# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-7083 September Term, 2024 of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41
. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
#### Collins, Administrator, *v.*Farnsworth and Another.—In error.

THE petition of an administrator to the Probate Court, for an order to sell real estate of the intestate to pay debts, need not contain a particular description of each of the debts; a statement, in such case, of the aggregate amount of the debts being sufficient. R. S. 1843, p. 527.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-63034, 333-91095, 333-85298, 333-107825, 333-113201 and 333-123445) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan andon Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-113812, 333-117625, 333-126267, 333-127492, 333-132353, 333-135265, 333-138640 and 333-139888) of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. of our reports dated February 22, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/    BDO SEIDMAN,LLP         

San Francisco, California 

February 22, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John R. Detwiler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2004                
|                                        
|/s/ JOHN R. DETWILER                    
|John R. Detwiler Chief Financial Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1931

To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 

Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the adoption credit and 

adoption assistance programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 22, 2003

Mr. BUNNING (for himself, Mr. MILLER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. 

SMITH, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion 

of the adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1931 IS 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF APPLICABILITY OF SUNSET OF THE 

2 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TAX RELIEF REC3 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2001 WITH RESPECT TO 

4 ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION ASSIST5 ANCE PROGRAMS. 

6 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

7 Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

10 the amendments made by section 202 (relating to expan11 sion of adoption credit and adoption assistance pro12 grams).’’.

Æ
#### A. McClure’s Exrx. *v.*Commonwealth.

'Criminal Law —■ Misdemeanor — Sureties on Bond — Liability for Fine and Costs — Recognizance.

In misdemeanor cases, the object in requiring bail, being to secure the performance of any judgment which may be rendered against the offender, it is error to render judgment for an amount greater than the fine imposed, and costs of court, not exceeding the amount of the recognizance. And the court may order any money deposited agreeably in the line of such bail, to be applied to the payment of such fine and costs.

APPEAL PROM M’CRAKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

Yeiser, for Appellant.

May 31, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

In misdemeanor cases the object of requiring bail is to secure the performance of any judgment which may be rendered against the offender. And as the fine imposed is, or should be regarded, as the measure of the injury sustained by the Commonwealth for a violation of her laws in the particular case in which it is imposed, it would seem that all that could be required of the surety - or could be properly adjudged against him when the defendant had failed to surrender himself in execution of the judgment rendered against him would be for the amount of the fine imposed, and the costs of the prosecution, not, of course, exceeding the amount of the recognizance. And -this view seems -to harmonize with the spirit and intention of the Criminal Code, for in section 87 it provides that upon a judgment being rendered against a defendant, for a fine and costs, the court rendering the judgment may order any money deposited agreeably to the foregoing sections to be applied to the payment thereof;” the money referred to as being deposited is where money has been deposited under section 84, Criminal Code, in line of bail.

If, of the money deposited by the defendant, only so much can be applied by the court having the custody thereof as will be required to pay the judgment for the fine and costs, there can be no good reason for making the surety in the bail bond pay any more. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to award a new trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Ranhoff, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2005                               
|                                                      
|/s/ DAVID A. RANHOFF                                  
|David A. Ranhoff President and Chief Executive
Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

—————————————————

IN RE CLAUDINE RENE FULLER,

 Debtor.

_________________________________

CLAUDINE RENE FULLER,

 Appellant,

 v.

TRACY L. ROBINSON,

 Appellee.

BAP No. KS-10-051

Bankr. No. 09-24146 

Chapter 13 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

August 11, 2010

—————————————————

On July 27, 2010, this Court entered a Notice of Deficiency and Order to Show 

Cause (“Order”), requiring the Appellant to do the following, or the appeal would be 

dismissed:

Pay the filing and docketing fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(b) & (c).

The deadline has expired without any response to the Order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure 

to prosecute. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8018-4(c).

BAP Appeal No. 10-51 Docket No. 13 Filed: 08/11/2010 Page: 1 of 2
2

For the Panel: 

Blaine F. Bates, Clerk of Court

By:

Gregory Wright

Deputy Clerk

BAP Appeal No. 10-51 Docket No. 13 Filed: 08/11/2010 Page: 2 of 2
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 32 88

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Dav id Ant ho ny Steb bi ns

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.

Rh on da W at ki ns , Boo ne Co un ty Circu it Cle rk ; St at e o f Ark an sa s

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Har ris on

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Jan ua ry

7, 2 01 4 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

10 , 20 14 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.Dav id St eb bi ns ap pe al s fro m th e Dis tri ct Co ur t’s pr e-s erv ic e di sm is sa l of hi s 1 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 co m

pl ai nt , in whi ch he al le ge d th at th e de fen da nt s vi ol at ed hi s rig ht of acce ss to th e co ur ts be cau se de fen da nt Rh on da W at ki ns fai le d to as si gn cas e

nu m be rs to th ree of St eb bi ns ’s di sm is se d st at e-co ur t m at te rs

. Upo n care fu l de no vo

rev ie w, se e Mo or e v

. S i ms , 2 0 0 F.3 d 11 70 , 11 71 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ) (p er cu ria m ), we

co nc lu de th at th e Dis tri ct Co ur t pr op erl y di sm is se d th e co m pl ai nt be cau se (1 ) th e St at e of Ark an sa s m ay no t be su ed un de r § 19 83 , se e W il li am s v. Mi ss ou ri, 97 3 F.2 d 59 9, 59 9– 60 0 ( 8 t h Ci r. 19 92 ) (p er cu ria m ), an d (2 ) St eb bi ns fai le d to st at e an act io na bl e acce ss -to -co ur ts cl ai m ag ai ns t de fen da nt W at ki ns , se e Man es s v. Dis tri ct Co ur t of Log an Co un ty-Nort he rn Div ., 49 5 F .3d 94 3, 94 4– 45 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (p er

cu ria m ); Cl owe rs v. Lass it er, 21 3 S.W .3d 6, 9 (Ark

. 20 05 ). W e al so co nc lu de th at th e D i s t ric t Co ur t pr op erl y de ni ed th e m ot io n fo r recu sa l, an d we affi rm th e de n i a l o f le av e to am en d be cau se , am on g ot he r reas on s, th e ne w cl ai m th at St eb bi ns wis he d to br in g di d no t st at e a cau se of act io n up on whi ch rel ie f m ay be gr an te d. See San ti ag o v. Bl ai r, 70 7 F .3d 98 4, 9 91 –9 2 (8 th Cir . 20 13 ). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le P.K. Hol m es , III, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e nd at io ns of th e Hon or ab le Ja m es R. Mar sc he wsk i, Uni te d S t a t es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s.
-2

-
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason
Tienor, Chief Executive Officer of Telkonet, Inc. (the “Company”), certify
that:





(1) The Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 which
this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jason
Tienor


Jason
Tienor


Chief
Executive Officer


April 1,
2008
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ARTHUR WAKEFIELD.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-910095, 333-63034, 333-85298, 333-107825, 333-113201, 333-123445, 333-132894 and 333-146771) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-113812, 333-117625, 333-126267, 333-127492, 333-132353, 333-135265, 333-138640, 333-139888, 333-140877 and 333-146773) of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2008, relatingto the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of Rainmaker Systems, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/    BDO SEIDMAN, LLP        

San Francisco, California 

March 10, 2008
Exploration Ground Systems

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

www.nasa.gov SP-2018-06-709-KSC

After modifications, one crawler-transporter will be able to

lift up to 18 million pounds. Two modified crawlers would be

able to move the St. Louis Gateway Arch.

(The Gateway Arch weighs 34,652,000 pounds not including the foundation) 

Moving the “Gateway to the West”

Kennedy Space Center, FL

Houston, TX

San Diego, CA

Huntsville, AL

During their 50 years of service, the crawlers have traveled a combined total of 5,000 

miles. That is enough to travel from Kennedy Space Center in Florida to Marshall 

Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, to Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas 

and over to San Diego, California and still have some miles to spare. All of these 

locations are playing a key role in preparing NASA for our Journey to Mars.

When placed side by side, 

three crawlers would take 

up an entire regulation size 

football field. 

THIRD DOWN,

GOAL TO GO

NASA’s two crawler-transporters are 

unique in the world. Originally built 

in 1965 to carry the massive Saturn 

V rocket and Apollo spacecraft from 

Kennedy’s Vehicle Assembly Building 

to Launch Complex 39, they continued 

to support human space exploration 

taking space shuttles to their launch 

pads for 30 years.

The crawlers are critical elements to enable future launch operations for NASA’s Journey to Mars. 

They could also be major players in Kennedy’s transition to a multi-user spaceport with one able 

to take commercially operated rockets and spacecraft to the launch pad, while the other is being 

strengthened to handle the Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion spacecraft atop the mobile launcher, 

a combination heavier than the Saturn V moon rockets the crawlers were designed to carry.

Crawler-Transporters

A baseball diamond can fit on top of the crawler.

SLOW TRIP

AROUND THE BASES

The new generators installed in the crawlers each produce 1500 

kilowatts -- enough power to run 17 International Space Stations.

VAST AMOUNTS OF ENERGY
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000892381
<NAME>                                      F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series IX
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   2,034,960
<SECURITIES>                                             5,512,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                              221,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         7,768,932
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           7,768,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      348,549
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               7,420,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             7,768,932
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           698,765
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           127,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            571,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               571,218
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                87.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Sense Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, I,
Dore Scott Perler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Dore Scott Perler                           Date:  March 30, 2007
---------------------
Dore Scott Perler
Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer,
principal financial and accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.