alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892997
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             518,217
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   518,217
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,433,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,811,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,433,267
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,987
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       68,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   229,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (293,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (293,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (293,183)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2184

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the rates of educational 

assistance for members of the Selected Reserve, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2004

Mr. BUNNING (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the 

rates of educational assistance for members of the Selected Reserve, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSIST4 ANCE FOR MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED RE5 SERVE. 

6 (a) INCREASE IN RATES.—Section 16131(b)(1) of 

7 title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking sub8 paragraphs (A), (B), and (C) and inserting the following 

9 new subparagraphs: 
2

•S 2184 IS 

1 ‘‘(A) for full time pursuit of such program of 

2 education— 

3 ‘‘(i) for months beginning on or after Octo4 ber 1, 2003, $282; 

5 ‘‘(ii) for months beginning on or after Oc6 tober 1, 2004, $342; 

7 ‘‘(iii) for months beginning on or after Oc8 tober 1, 2005, $402; 

9 ‘‘(iv) for months beginning on or after Oc10 tober 1, 2006, $463; 

11 ‘‘(B) for three-quarter time pursuit of such pro12 gram of education— 

13 ‘‘(i) for months beginning on or after Octo14 ber 1, 2003, $212; 

15 ‘‘(ii) for months beginning on or after Oc16 tober 1, 2004, $257; 

17 ‘‘(iii) for months beginning on or after Oc18 tober 1, 2005, $302; 

19 ‘‘(iv) for months beginning on or after Oc20 tober 1, 2006, $348; 

21 ‘‘(C) for half-time pursuit of such program of 

22 education— 

23 ‘‘(i) for months beginning on or after Octo24 ber 1, 2003, $140; 
3

•S 2184 IS 

1 ‘‘(ii) for months beginning on or after Oc2 tober 1, 2004, $170; 

3 ‘‘(iii) for months beginning on or after Oc4 tober 1, 2005, $200; 

5 ‘‘(iv) for months beginning on or after Oc6 tober 1, 2006, $231; and’’. 

7 (b) SUSPENSION OF COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT

8 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2007.—No adjustment shall be 

9 made under paragraph (2) of section 16131(b) of title 10, 

10 United States Code, in monthly rates of educational as11 sistance specified in paragraph (1) of that section, as 

12 amended by subsection (a) of this section, for fiscal year 

13 2005, 2006, or 2007.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Richard Van Dusen, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 625]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Initially, petitioner’s contention that the misbehavior report was invalid because it was typewritten prior to the urinalysis tests being completed is without merit. The record establishes that the specific information pertaining to *980petitioner was handwritten after the tests were performed and the results obtained (see *Matter of Yarbrough v Goord,*300 AD2d 725, 725-726 [2002]). We are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that the alleged discrepancies in the time indicated on the request for urinalysis form and the refrigerator log book as to when petitioner’s urine sample was placed in the freezer renders the test results unreliable. The request for urinalysis form sufficiently sets forth an unbroken chain of custody *(see Matter of Frazier v Goord,*251 AD2d 800, 801 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 813 [1998]). Moreover, even acknowledging that a discrepancy in the times noted exists, petitioner offered no evidence that his urine specimen was tampered with or could have been confused with another sample *(see Matter of Zippo v Goord,*2 AD3d 1006 [2003]; *Matter of Curry v Coughlin,*175 AD2d 970, 970-971 [1991]). Similarly unavailing is petitioner’s challenge to the calibration rates and reagents used inasmuch as the testimony at the hearing establishes that appropriate urinalysis testing procedures were followed *(see*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; *Matter of Carbuccia v Goord,*298 AD2d 801 [2002]). To that end, the misbehavior report, positive results of the urinalysis tests and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Graziano v Selsky,*9 AD3d 752 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims of hearing officer bias and excessive penalty, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
NW-2003-08-05-JSC

Michael P. Anderson

David M. Brown

Rick D. Husband William C. McCool Laurel B. Clark Kalpana Chawla

For further information: spaceflight .nasa.gov January 2004

Ilan Ramon

We honor the legacy of the STS-107 crew. Their spirit will remain with us forever.

Scott D. 

Altman

Clayton C. 

Anderson

Dominic A. 

Antonelli

Lee J. 

Archambault

Jeffrey S. 

Ashby

Ellen S. 

Baker

Ellen 

Ochoa

Michael R. 

Barratt

Daniel T. 

Barry

Robert L. 

Behnken

Michael J. 

Bloomfield

Eric A. 

Boe

Stephen G. 

Bowen

Kenneth D. 

Bowersox

Daniel C. 

Burbank

 Daniel W. 

Bursch

Yvonne D. 

Cagle

Fernando 

Caldeiro

Tracy E. 

Caldwell

Charles J. 

Camarda

Duane G. 

Carey

Gregory E. 

Chamitoff

Franklin R. 

Chang-Díaz

Leroy 

Chiao

Kenneth D. 

Cockrell

Catherine G. 

Coleman

Eileen M.

 Collins

Timothy J. 

Creamer

Robert L. 

Curbeam, Jr.

Nancy J. 

Currie

B. Alvin 

Drew

Christopher J. 

Ferguson

Andrew J. 

Feustel

E. Michael 

Fincke

Anna L. 

Fisher

C. Michael 

Foale

Kevin A. 

Ford

Michael J. 

Foreman

Patrick G. 

Forrester

Michael E. 

Fossum

Stephen N. 

Frick

Ronald J. 

Garan, Jr.

Michael L. 

Gernhardt

Linda M. 

Godwin

Michael T. 

Good

Dominic L. 

Pudwill Gorie

John M. 

Grunsfeld

James D. 

Halsell, Jr.

Kenneth T. 

Ham

John B. 

Herrington

Joan E. 

Higginbotham

Kathryn P. 

Hire

Charles O. 

Hobaugh

Scott J. 

Horowitz

Douglas G. 

Hurley

Marsha S. 

Ivins

Brent W. 

Jett, Jr.

Gregory C. 

Johnson

Gregory H. 

Johnson

Janet L. 

Kavandi

James M. 

Kelly

Mark E. 

Kelly

Scott J. 

Kelly

Timothy L. 

Kopra

Wendy B. 

Lawrence

Steven W. 

Lindsey

Richard M. 

Linnehan

Paul S. 

Lockhart

Michael E. 

Lopez-Alegria

Christopher J. 

Loria

Stanley G. 

Love

Edward T. 

Lu

Sandra H. 

Magnus

Michael J. 

Massimino

Richard A. 

Mastracchio

K. Megan 

McArthur

William S. 

McArthur, Jr.

Pamela A. 

Melroy

Leland D. 

Melvin

Barbara R. 

Morgan

Lee M. 

Morin

James H. 

Newman

Carlos I. 

Noriega

Lisa M. 

Nowak

Karen L. 

Nyberg

William A. 

Oefelein

John D. 

Olivas

Scott E. 

Parazynski

Nicholas J. M. 

Patrick

Donald R. 

Pettit

John L. 

Phillips

Alan G. 

Poindexter

Mark L. 

Polansky

James F. 

Reilly, II

Garrett E. 

Reisman

Stephen K. 

Robinson

Kent V. 

Rominger

Piers J. 

Sellers

Steven L. 

Smith

Heidemarie M. 

Stefanyshyn-Piper

Nicole P. 

Stott

Frederick W. 

Sturckow

Steven R. 

Swanson

Daniel M. 

Tani

Joseph R. 

Tanner

Andrew S. W. 

Thomas

Donald A. 

Thomas

Terry W. 

Virts, Jr.

Janice E. 

Voss

Rex J. 

Walheim

James D. 

Wetherbee

Douglas H. 

Wheelock

Peggy A. 

Whitson

Terrence W. 

Wilcutt

Jeffrey N. 

Williams

Sunita L. 

Williams

Barry E. 

Wilmore

Stephanie D. 

Wilson

David A. 

Wolf

Neil W. 

Woodward, III

John W. 

Young

George D. 

Zamka

Jerry L.

Ross

Shannon W.

Lucid
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60807

Summary Calendar

 

REYES IVAN ESPINOZA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 757 257

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reyes Ivan Espinoza petitions this court for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming, without

opinion, the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his

application for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229b(b). Espinoza challenges as “arbitrary and irrational”

the IJ’s determination that he had failed to establish either the

statutory requirement of 10 years of continuous physical presence

in the United States or that his four children would suffer
No. 03-60807

-2-

“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” if the family were

removed to Mexico. 

Because this case involves the granting of relief under 

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b), the jurisdictional bar of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) is implicated. See Garcia-Melendez v.

Ashcroft, 351 F.3d 657, 661 (5th Cir. 2003). The jurisdictionstripping provision eliminates jurisdiction over those decisions

that involve the exercise of discretion. Mireles-Valdez v.

Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir. 2003). The IJ’s

determination that Espinoza’s children would not suffer an

“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” if Espinoza were

deported to Mexico involved the exercise of discretion. Rueda v.

Ashcroft, F.3d (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2004, No. 03-60730),

2004 WL 1747388 at *1. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction

to review the IJ’s determination on hardship, and Espinoza’s

petition is DISMISSED.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Presidential Documents 67905 

Proclamation 8594 of October 29, 2010 

National Hospice Month, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Hospice Month, we recognize the dignity hospice care can 

provide to patients who need it most, and the professionals, volunteers, 

and family members who bring peace to individuals in their final days. 

Hospice care gives medical services, emotional support, and spiritual resources to people facing life-limiting illnesses. It can also help families 

and caregivers manage the details and emotional challenges of caring for 

a dying loved one. The decision to place someone into a hospice program 

can be difficult, but Americans can have peace of mind knowing the doctors 

and professionals involved with these services are trained to administer 

high-quality and comprehensive care for terminally ill individuals. As many 

of our Nation’s veterans age and cope with illness, hospice and palliative 

care can also provide tailored support to meet the needs of these heroes. 

The Affordable Care Act signed into law this year protects and expands 

hospice services covered under Federal health care programs. Prior to its 

enactment, the prohibition on concurrent care for Federal health care programs meant patients could not receive hospice care before first discontinuing 

treatments to cure their disease. The Affordable Care Act permanently eliminates this prohibition for children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s 

Health Insurance Program, and creates demonstration projects to test how 

the elimination of the concurrent care prohibition would impact Medicare. 

As a result, fewer children, seniors, and families will have to make the 

heart-rending choice between coverage that fights an illness and coverage 

that provides needed comfort. 

All Americans should take comfort in the important work of hospice care, 

which enables individuals to carry on their lives, in spite of a terminal 

illness. During this month, let us recognize those who allow the terminally 

ill to receive comfortable and dignified care. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2010 

as National Hospice Month. I encourage citizens, medical institutions, government and social service agencies, businesses, nonprofit organizations, and 

other interested groups to join in activities that promote awareness of the 

important role of hospice care. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
67906 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28082 

Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESOB#1.EPS</GPH>
BRYAN D. O’CONNOR (COLONEL, USMC, RET.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born September 6, 1946, in Orange, California, but considers 

Twentynine Palms, California, to be his hometown. Bryan and his wife, Susan, have two 

married sons, Thomas and Kevin, and three granddaughters, Ella, Riley and Colby. The 

O’Connor family enjoys hiking, photography, artisan bread baking, music and 

gardening.

EDUCATION: Graduated from Twentynine Palms High School, Twentynine Palms, 

California, in 1964; received a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering (minor in 

Aeronautical Engineering) from the United States Naval Academy in 1968 and a Master 

of Science degree in Aeronautical Systems from the University of West Florida in 1970.

He graduated from the Naval Safety School at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, 

California, in 1972 and from the Naval Test Pilot School, Naval Air Test Center, 

Patuxent River, Maryland, in 1976.

SPECIAL HONORS: Naval Safety School Top Graduate; Naval Test Pilot School 

Distinguished Graduate Award; Defense Superior Service Medal; Distinguished Flying Cross; NASA Distinguished Service 

Medal; NASA Outstanding Leadership Medal; NASA Exceptional Service Medal; NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal.

EXPERIENCE: O’Connor began active duty with the United States Marine Corps in June 1968 following graduation from the 

U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis. He received his Naval Aviator’s wings in June 1970, and served as an attack pilot, flying the 

A-4 Skyhawk and the AV-8A Harrier on land and sea assignments in the United States, Europe and the Western Pacific. 

O’Connor served as a test pilot with the Naval Air Test Center from 1976 to 1979. He participated in flying qualities, 

performance, carrier suitability, weapons and systems testing evaluations of various conventional and VSTOL aircraft, including 

the A-4, OV-10, AV-8 and X-22 VSTOL research aircraft. When informed of his selection to NASA’s Astronaut Program in 

1980, he was serving as the Deputy Program Manager (Acquisition) for the AV-8 program at the Naval Air Systems Command 

in Washington, D.C.

NASA EXPERIENCE: O’Connor served in a variety of research development test and evaluation roles in three tours at 

NASA, covering 24 years between 1980 and his retirement as NASA’s Chief of Safety and Mission Assurance in August 2011.

As of this writing, O’Connor has flown more than 5,000 hours in over 40 types of aircraft and is a veteran of two space shuttle 

flights.

SPACEFLIGHT EXPERIENCE: STS-61B Atlantis (November 26 to December 3, 1985). O’Connor served as pilot on this 

satellite deploy and flight control test and evaluation flight. After completing 108 orbits of the Earth, Atlantis returned to land at 

Edwards Air Force Base.

STS-40 Columbia (June 5 to June 14, 1991). O’Connor served as commander of the first space shuttle mission dedicated fully to 

life science studies. After 145 orbits of the Earth, Columbia returned to land at Edwards Air Force Base.

AUGUST 2011

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
#### Beck and Another *v.*Williams.

*Joel Williams*filed a *pnedpe*in his right name for a writ; the clerk issued ’ the writ in the name of *Joel Williamson;*and the plaintiff declared in his right name. *Meld,*that the-writ, as to the plaintiff’s name, might be amended by the *preedpe.*

The making of such an amendment does not entitle the defendant to a. continuance.

*Tuesday, November*24.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, *J.*

Jo.el *Williams,*the defendant in this Court, ■ brought an action of debt in the Circuit Court against *Beck*& *Simpson.*The writ was issued in the name of *Joel Williamson,*but the plaintiff declared by the name of *Joel Williams.*The defendants pleaded the misnomer in abatement, whereupon the plaintiff-moved the Court for leave to amend the writ by the *prcecipe.*The Court gave the plaintiff leave to amend by striking out the name of *Williamson*and inserting *Williams.*The defendants then moved the, *375Court to continue the cause which was overruled, and judgment was given for the plaintiff. The questions submitted to us are, Did the Court err in permitting the plaintiff in the Circuit Court to amend his writ? 2. Were the defendants, after the amendment was made, entitled to a continuance of the cause?

*C. B.*Smith, for the plaintiffs.

*C. H.*Test, for the defendant.

The plaintiff, before the writ issued, filed a *praecipe*with the clerk of the Circuit Court, requiring a writ in the name of *Joel*Williams, that being the proper name of the plaintiff. The clerk, by mistake as we suppose, issued it in the name of *Joel Williamson.*This was a misprision of that officer. In such cases, where there is any thing to amend by, it is in the power of the Court to permit the amendment to be made, and they will exercise it when great injury would otherwise ensue. Petersd. Abr. tit. Amend. C. — 1 T. R. 782, 3. — 7 *id.*295. — 3 Ch. Gen. Pr. 235. The Court did right in permitting the amendment to be made in the present case.

There is nothing in the objection, that the Court erred in refusing to continue the cause. The declaration was right, and the amendment in the process did not surprise the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 *per cent.*damages and costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2078 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2078

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device panel 
      assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type 
                              televisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2004

  Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Specter) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device panel 
      assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type 
                              televisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICE PANEL ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.24       Liquid Crystal       Free       No change        No change        On or before 12/
                          Device panel                                                      31/2006           ''
                          assemblies for use                                                                   .
                          in Liquid Crystal
                          Device projection
                          type televisions
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9013.80.90).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Moody *v.*The State.—In error.

*Monday, June*23.

AN indictment cannot be sustained without proof that the offence was committed in the county where the venue is laid. 1 Chitt. C. L. 557.

The caption of an indictment may; by leave of the Court, be amended by the prosecuting attorney. 1 Chitt. C. L. 335.