alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Butler and Another *v.*Doe, on the Demise of Rockafellar.

*Tuesday, November*26.

A purchaser of an equity of redemption of real estate cannot support an action of ejectment, commenced before the revised statutes of 1843, for the mortgaged premises, against a purchaser of them from the mortgagee.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

— This was an action of ejectment. ■ Plea, not guilty. Trial by the Court, and judgment for the plaintiff.

*248*G. Holland,*for the plaintiffs.

*J. M. Johnston,*for the defendant.

The facts were the following: The premises in question _ originally belonged to *Bull,*one of the defendants, who mortgaged them to one *Berry*to secure the payment of three promissory notes. *Berry*assigned the notes to *Butler, ike*other defendant, and sold and conveyed to him the mortgaged premises. Subsequently to the mortgage, Rockafellar, the lessor of the plaintiff, recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court against Bull, and issued an execution which was levied upon the mortgaged premises. The sheriff sold them to Rockafellar, on the execution, and executed a deed to him. There was no reservation in the mortgage of the possession to the mortgagor. At the commencement of the action, *Bull*was in possession under his landlord, *Butler.*

We think the evidence did not justify the finding of the Circuit Court for the plaintiff. To sustain the action, it was necessary that the lessor of the plaintiff should have had the legal title. But/by his purchase at the sheriff’s sale, he acquired only the equity of redemption, and was placed thereby in the situation of the mortgagor. The mortgagee possessed the legal title, and might have maintained ejectment against the mortgagor. *Keech*v. Hall, 1 Dougl. 21. *Doe d. Roby*v. Maisey, 8 B. & C. 767. A mortgagee can devise or alien the legal estate ; and it passes to his heir by descent. *Givan*v. *Doe d.*Tout, *May*term, 1844. *Butler*acquired the legal estate, by his purchase from the mortgagee, and must be considered as standing in his place. This action, then, is governed by the same principles that would have controlled it, had it been between the original parties to the mortgage; and, certainly, a mortgagor cannot recover in ejectment against the mortgagee in possession. But the reverse is true, as has been already stated. At least, this was the law before the late revision of the statutes. The action of ejectment by the mortgagee, his assigns, or representatives, is, perhaps, now abolished. R* S. 1843, p. 459. But that revision was not in force at the commencement of this action.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed at the costs of the lessor. Cause remanded, &c.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

ROBERT G. WING, as receiver for Vescor 

Capital Corp. and Vescor Capital, Inc., 

Nevada corporations, Vescorp Capital, 

LLC, Vescorp Capital IV-A, LLC, and 

Vescorp Capital IV-M, LLC, Nevada 

limited liability companies, and their 

related entities, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KAY BUCHANAN; ANN CULLINAN,

 Defendants - Appellants,

and

BERNARDO'S CORPORATION; 

BUCHANAN FAMILY TRUST; B&I 

BUCHANAN FAMILY LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP; BUCHANAN FAMILY 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; BUCK 

INVESTMENTS, LLC; BAKI, LLC, 

 Defendants.

No. 14-4079

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00803-DB)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The stipulation filed by the parties to dismiss the captioned appeal is granted. 

Each party shall bear its own costs.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

October 28, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4079 Document: 01019514636 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 1 
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-4079 Document: 01019514636 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          154,977
<SECURITIES>                                     21,469
<RECEIVABLES>                                   229,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9,335
<INVENTORY>                                     114,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                557,064
<PP&E>                                           32,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                   55,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  640,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           266,408
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            349
<OTHER-SE>                                      374,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    640,919
<SALES>                                       1,624,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,624,982
<CGS>                                         1,362,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,362,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                214,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  40,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                     23,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16,585
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.47
                                              


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew Medeiros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SonicWALL, Inc.



By:

/s/    MATTHEW
MEDEIROSName:

Matthew MedeirosTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I,
Michael Sheridan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SonicWALL, Inc.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL
SHERIDANName:

Michael SheridanTitle:

Senior Vice President of Strategy, ChiefFinancial Officer and
Secretary
**Exhibit
      13.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Radware Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Meir Moshe, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      June 5, 2007




/s/
                Meir
                Moshe
              Meir
                Moshe
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THERESA LEWIS.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### In the Matter of Crystal Antoinette C., an Infant. Eric L., Appellant; New York Foundling Hospital, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 873]

Order Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about October 30, 1998, which denied respondent-appellant’s motion to vacate an order, same court and Judge, entered on or about April 21, 1997, on default, denying respondent’s motion to vacate an order, same court and Judge, entered on or about October 29, 1996, on default, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s motion to vacate his default in appearing at the hearing on whether the petition to terminate his parental rights was properly served, which hearing was twice rescheduled when he failed to appear, was properly denied for failure to show a reasonable excuse for such repeated failure to appear (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *see Matter of Jones,*128 AD2d 403 [1987]). It also appears that the motion was untimely made more than a year after respondent’s attorney had actual notice of the order denying the motion to vacate the dispositional order (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *see Matter of Brittany J.,*235 AD2d 310 [1997], *lv dismissed*89 NY2d 1086 [1997]). In view of the foregoing, we do not consider whether respondent has a meritorious defense, although we note that his claim that he visited the child regularly is contradicted by the agency’s records. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT BORNHOFEN; EXCEL-JET

LTD., a Colorado corporation,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

BRUNON LESLAW BIERNACKI;

ANDRZEJ FRYDRYCHEWICZ,

 Defendants - Appellants,

and

MACIEJ SZYMANSKI,

 Defendant.

No. 10-1115

(D.C. No.1:07-CV-02463-CMA-MJW )

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B).

Appellate Case: 10-1115 Document: 01018466949 Date Filed: 07/28/2010 Page: 1 
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1115 Document: 01018466949 Date Filed: 07/28/2010 Page: 2
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel J. DormanName:
                      Daniel
      J. DormanTitle:
                      President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial
  Officer)Date:
                      May
      8, 2009





The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
X-59 MAKER BUNDLE

X-59 COLORING PAGE

CONSTRUYENDO TU 

PROPIO X-59 DE PAPEL

ENGLISH

SPANISH

X-59 PAPER AIRPLANE

CONSTRUYENDO TU 

PROPIO X-59

X-59 3D PAPER X-59 3D PRINT FILES

DESKTOP MODEL

MODELO DE PAPEL EN 

3D A ESCALA DEL X-59

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Here at NASA we are working with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works to build 

our X-59 aircraft—now you can too! Our education team has put together 

an X-59 Maker Bundle to allow students of all ages and experience levels to 

build with us! Try your hand at one or all of these activities, available in both 

English and Spanish. Feeling creative? Find ways to add to or adapt our 

activities. Happy building!

LEVEL 1

NIVEL 1

LEVEL 2

NIVEL 2

LEVEL 3

NIVEL 3

LEVEL 3
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Sina Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Charles Chao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Charles ChaoCharles ChaoChief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Batty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2005           
|                                  
|/s/ JOHN BATTY                    
|John Batty Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,718
<PP&E>                                       7,707,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,720,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,720,438
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (174,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (174,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (174,073)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.36**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Huttig Building Products, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2003. The Plan was last restated asof December 3, 2001. 

 

The Plan is amended as follows: 

 

1. Clause (c) of Section 7 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety asfollows: 

 

“*(c)* Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee oras otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, if a Participant’s employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability or retirement or after a Change in Control, such Participant may exercise any Option in whole or in part, atany time within 90 days after such termination of employment, but only to the extent such Option is exercisable at the date of termination in accordance with Section 6(b). In no event may any Option be exercised after the expiration of the term ofthe Option.” 

 

2. Effective Date: This amendment shall be effective as ofMarch 5, 2003.
Exhibit 32.2


         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Health Systems
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Susan Baxter Gibson, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


By:      /s/ Susan Baxter Gibson
         -----------------------
             Susan Baxter Gibson
             Principal Financial Officer
             March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,686,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,273,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,728,709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,750,703
<PP&E>                                      87,490,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,277,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,658,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,328,212
<BONDS>                                      1,724,821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       15,910,755
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,428
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,455,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,658,259
<SALES>                                     26,462,208<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,462,208<F1>
<CGS>                                       16,898,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,409,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (574,668)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,627,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,689,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,938,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,938,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<FN>
<F1>Sales and Total Revenues are net of federal and state excise taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>