Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65525 

Fair’’; and ‘‘Calendars.’’ Other 

documentation appeared under the 

headings of ‘‘UAW–GM Golf 

Tournaments’’ and ‘‘Community Service 

& Charitable Activities.’’ 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the Department 

determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not 

been met. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26772 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,327] 

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim 

Management Services, Inc. Operations, 

a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green 

Bay, WI; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 26, 2010, 

a petitioner requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA), 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Anthem Blue Cross Blue 

Shield, Claim Management Services, 

Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint, 

Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin (the subject 

firm). The Notice of determination was 

signed on August 16, 2010, and was 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187). The 

workers supply claims processing 

services and customer service functions, 

and are not separately identifiable by 

service. 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The negative determination of the 

TAA petition filed on behalf of workers 

at the subject firm was based on the 

findings that there was neither a shift in 

the supply of claims processing and 

customer service functions to a foreign 

country, nor imports of claims 

processing and customer service 

functions during the relevant period, 

and that the subject firm is not a 

supplier or downstream producer to a 

firm that employed a worker group 

eligible to apply for TAA. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner stated that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

based on a shift to a foreign country. 

The petitioner also noted that workers at 

other locations of Anthem Blue Cross 

Blue Shield are eligible to apply for 

TAA, and urged the Department to ‘‘take 

a look at the entire company and review 

this again and you will find that they 

have outsourced to [a foreign country].’’ 

The Department has confirmed that 

workers at several other locations of 

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are 

eligible to apply for TAA on the basis 

of a shift to a foreign country; however, 

the workers at the subject facility supply 

services that are distinctly different and 

separate from those supplied by workers 

at the other Anthem Blue Cross Blue 

Shield locations, and the work that was 

performed by Anthem Blue Cross Blue 

Shield workers who are eligible to apply 

for TAA based on a shift abroad had 

never been performed at the subject 

facility. 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the Department 

determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not 

been met. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26774 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,063] 

TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, 

WV; Notice of Revised Determination 

on Reconsideration 

By application dated August 12, 2010 

petitioners requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding the 

eligibility of workers and former 

workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, 

Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for 

Trade Adjustment Assistance. On 

August 30, 2010, the Department issued 

a Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration. The Department’s 

Notice was published in the Federal 

Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR 

55612). Workers at the subject firm are 

engaged in employment related to the 

supply of insurance call center services. 

Based on the information obtained 

during the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department 

determines that the subject firm shifted 

to a foreign country a significant 

proportion of the services like or 

directly competitive with the insurance 

call center services supplied by the 

subject workers. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained during the 

reconsideration investigation, I 

determine that workers of TRG 

Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West 

Virginia, who are engaged in 

employment related to the supply of 

insurance call center services, meet the 

worker group certification criteria under 

Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 

2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65526 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the 

following certification: 

All workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, 

Beckley, West Virginia, who became totally 

or partially separated from employment on or 

after May 7, 2009, through two years from the 

date of this revised certification, and all 

workers in the group threatened with total or 

partial separation from employment on date 

of certification through two years from the 

date of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of 

October, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26773 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,608] 

Xilinx, Inc., Including On-Site Leased 

Workers of TEKsystems, Albuquerque, 

NM; Notice of Revised Determination 

on Reconsideration 

On January 25, 2010, the Department 

issued a Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration applicable to 

workers and former workers of Xilinx, 

Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico (the 

subject firm). The Department’s Notice 

was published in the Federal Register 

on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7031). The 

workers are engaged in employment 

related to the supply of internally used 

engineering services. 

In the request for reconsideration, 

workers alleged that the subject firm has 

shifted abroad the supply of services 

like and directly competitive with the 

internal-use engineering services 

supplied by the Albuquerque, New 

Mexico facility and provided 

documentation in support of the 

allegation. The new documentation 

included a February 29, 2008, 

advertisement for a product engineer/ 

senior product engineer for one offshore 

location of Xilinx, Inc.; and a job 

advertisement dated May 19, 2009, for 

integrated circuit test engineers and test 

equipment engineers for a Product and 

Test Engineering Department of a 

foreign Xilinx facility. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department carefully 

reviewed the new information and 

previously submitted information, and 

sought clarification from the subject 

firm. 

Based on the information obtained 

during the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department 

determines that a significant proportion 

or number of workers at the subject firm 

was totally or partially separated, or 

threatened with such separation; that 

the subject firm shifted to a foreign 

country the supply of services like or 

directly competitive with the 

engineering services supplied by 

workers at the subject firm; and that the 

subject worker group includes on-site 

leased workers of TEKsystems. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained on reconsideration, I 

determine that workers of Xilinx, Inc., 

including on-site leased workers of 

TEKsystems, Albuquerque, New 

Mexico, who are engaged in 

employment related to the supply of 

internal-use engineering services, meet 

the worker group certification criteria 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with 

Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, 

I make the following certification: 

All workers of Xilinx, Inc., including onsite leased workers of TEKsystems, 

Albuquerque, New Mexico, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after July 7, 2008, through 

two years from the date of this certification, 

and all workers in the group threatened with 

total or partial separation from employment 

on date of certification through two years 

from the date of certification, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, 

as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26771 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,032] 

AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon, 

PA; Notice of Revised Determination 

on Reconsideration 

By application dated June 1, 2010 a 

union official requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding the 

eligibility of workers and former 

workers of AGY Holding Corporation, 

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, to apply for 

Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). On 

June 21, 2010, the Department issued a 

Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration. The Department’s 

Notice of affirmative determination was 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 1, 2010, 2010 (75 FR 38126). 

Workers at the subject firm are 

engaged in employment related to the 

production of fine yarns and specialty 

glass yarns. The worker group does not 

include on-site leased workers. 

Based on the information obtained 

during the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department 

determines that the subject firm shifted 

abroad a meaningful proportion of 

production of articles like or directly 

competitive with the fine yarns and/or 

specialty glass yarns produced by the 

workers. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained during the 

reconsideration investigation, I 

determine that workers of AGY Holding 

Corporation, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, 

who are engaged in employment related 

to the production of fine yarns and 

specialty glass yarns, meet the worker 

group certification criteria under 

Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 

2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 

of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the 

following certification: 

All workers of AGY Holding Corporation, 

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after June 4, 2008, through 

two years from the date of this revised 

certification, and all workers in the group 

threatened with total or partial separation 

from employment on date of certification 

through two years from the date of 

certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26770 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

Information Security Oversight Office 

National Industrial Security Program 

Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) 

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight 

Office, National Archives and Records 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES