alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Larkin, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|        | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Larkin              |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy A. Larkin                  |
| *Executive Vice President,*        |
| *Chief Financial Officer*          |
| *And Principal Accounting Officer* |
| * *                           |
| August 2, 2007                     |

 

1

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ABDULA L. JACKSON, Petitioner,

v.

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, Respondent.

______________________

2012

- 3198

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. DC0752120075 -I- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSEPH M. H ANNON

, J R

. , Hannon Law Group, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. With him on the

brief was D ANIEL S. C ROWLEY

.

J OSHUA E. K URLAND , Trial Attorney, Commercial Lit igation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued f or respondent.

With him on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY , Acting Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Dire ctor, and D EBORAH A. B YNUM , Assistant Director.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA

, M AYER

, and T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk
#### Townsend and Others *v.*Doe, on the Demise of Chapin and Others—In error.

AFTER the testimony in this case was closed, the defendants moved that every instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof to the jury, should be in writing, and objected *329to any instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof being given, unless the same should be written. *Held,*that the Court, by afterwards giving, at the plaintiff’s request, instructions to the jury with verbal explanations and illustrations, committed an error. Stat. 1839, ,p. 37.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1028

___________

Tamara Stone Enderud, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

George Jackson Mental Health Center, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Arkansas Department of Human *

Services, (Originally sued as George *

Jackson Mental Health Center) also *

known as George Jackson Mental *

Healthcare, *

*

Appellee.

___________

 Submitted: February 21, 2001

 Filed: February 26, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Tamara Stone-Enderud appeals the district court’s1 judgment in favor of

defendant following a bench trial in her employment discrimination action. After

careful consideration of the arguments in Stone-Enderud’s brief, we conclude that the

district court’s judgment should be affirmed. Stone-Enderud fails to direct us to

anything in the record which would show that the district court erred in entering

judgment against her after finding that her former employer did not engage in

intentional discrimination against her based on her religion.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
- Home
- Gateway Deep Space Logistics
- Student & STEM...

- Deep Space Logistics Home
- About Deep Space Logistics
- Team Features   - Meet Gateway’s Rob Ashley
  - Meet Gateway’s Gary O’Neil
- Multimedia   - NASA Image Library
  - Flickr
- Opportunities   - Partnerships
  - Student & STEM Information

# 							Student & STEM Opportunities						

NASA’s Deep Space Logistics Project supports a limited number of student research and internship opportunities every year.  Our project also collaborates with other NASA organizations to support students and STEM Education at all levels.  Our student opportunities are aimed at new technology development and the application of NASA’s commercial spaceflight services approach that are so critical to achieving our vision to ***Enable and Vibrant Commercial Supply Chain in Deep Space. ***

Some of our previous  research and internships have focused on Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC), Deep Space Environments & Spacecraft Thermal Modeling, Lunar Dust Mitigation, Spacecraft Rendezvous Proximity Operations and Docking (RPOD), Cargo Packing and Delivery, 3D Printing from Waste Materials, In-space Refueling and Smallsat/Cubesat Interfaces and Science Missions.  

We have also supported students in areas of commercial acquisition, strategic communications and the development and management of NASA public/private partnerships for space exploration. 

Here’s how to find out more about NASA’s Internship Programs.

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Gateway Space Station News
Explore the latest updates, developments, announcements, and images of NASA's Gateway space station. Stay informed and inspired as NASA and...

Humans In Space

Commercial Space
NASA Internship Programs
NASA’s internship programs provide training, mentoring, and career development opportunities while working with the best science, engineering, financial, information technology...
#### DOUGLAS P. BONNET v. ALEXANDER STEWART v. NATIONAL EMBLEM INSURANCE CO.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*326)
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, R. David Martin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Action PerformanceCompanies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
/s/ R. David MartinR. David Martin
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, ) )
v. ) ID No. 2105014269 ) DAVID MITCHELL , ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

On this 10th day of April , 2024, upon consideration of Defendant David

Mitchell ’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Sentence Modification made pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) (the “Motion”), 1 the sentence imposed upon Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:

1. On July 25, 2022, Defendant pled guilty to Drug Possession (Class E Felony). 2 On the same day, the Court sentenced him to five years of Level V supervision, suspended immediately for eighteen months of Level III supervision. 3

2. On December 1, 2023, the Delaware Department of Correction (“ DOC ”)

stated that Defendant had violated probation by testing positive for nonprescribed

controlled substances on November 13, 2023. 4 On December 5, 2023, the Court

found that Defendant had violated the terms of his probation , based on the December

1 D.I. 33. Defendant does not specifically cite to Rule 35(b) in the Motion, but he asks this Court to modify the conditions of his probation. 2 D.I. 21. 3 D.I. 23. 4 D.I. 30.2

1, 2023 violation report, and sentenced him to four years, nine months, and twenty

eight days of Level V supervision, suspended for six months of Level III supervision. 5

3. On January 11, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion, in which he asks

the Court to modify the remaining portion of his sentence to Level II supervision. In support, Defendant argues that his positive drug test result from November 13, 2023, was a false positive due to interference from cold medication he had take n.
He adds that , during his probationary period , he has not missed a scheduled visit with his probation officer or violated his curfew. 6

4. Rule 35(b) authorizes this Court to “reduce the fine or term or conditions of partial confinement or probation, at any time.” A motion to modify the terms of partial confinement or probation is not subject to the ninety

- day limitation that applies to a motion for sentence reduction. 7

5. On December 1 , 2023, t he DOC stated that Defendant appeared to be continuing to abuse nonprescribed controlled substances. When Defendant

maintained that he had not used those substances , despite the positive drug test result, the DOC sent his urine to a toxicology laboratory for further testing.

5 D.I. 32. 6 D.I. 33. 7 State v. Harmon , 2023 WL 7599111, at *1 (Del. Super. Nov. 14, 2023) (quoting State v. Bail e y , 2017 WL 8787504, at *1 (Del. Super. Oct. 3, 2017)).3

Subsequently, the laboratory confirmed to the DOC that the drug test result was positive. 8

6. The record does not provide support for Defendant’s assertion that his positive drug test result from November 13, 2023, was a false positive. Further, Defendant has not provided any other information that would warrant a modification

of the terms of his probation

. Hence, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________ ________ Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge

8 D.I. 30.
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 

X-59 Crossword Puzzle

 

Figure 1. The X-59 in flight

Background Information

NASA's aeronautical innovators are leading a government-industry team to collect data that could 

make supersonic flight over land possible, dramatically reducing travel time in the United States 

or anywhere in the world. 

The Low-boom Flight Demonstration mission has 

two goals: 

1. Design and build a piloted, large-scale 

supersonic X-plane with technology that 

reduces the loudness of a sonic boom to that 

of a gentle thump. 

2. Fly the X-plane over select U.S. communities 

to gather data on human responses to the lowboom flights and deliver that data set to U.S. 

and international regulators. 

o a In 2023, the X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology Figure 2. The X-59's unique design reduces the sonic boom t

quieter sonic thump.

(QueSST) will begin community flight tests that will 

demonstrate that annoying sonic booms can be transformed into quieter “sonic thumps.” These 

flights and the data they generate will pave the way for a next generation of commercial supersonic 

flight.

The data will enable new sound-based rules regarding supersonic flight over land to be written and 

adopted, which would open the doors to new commercial cargo and passenger markets to provide 

faster-than-sound air travel. NASA's X-59 QueSST experimental aircraft is the culmination of 

decades of research on supersonic flight, sonic booms and noise reduction. 
Learn about the X-59 by visiting https://www.nasa.gov/specials/X59/, read the background 

information, and then complete the puzzle. 

 
Across Down

4. Type of wave where the disturbance 1. An experimental airplane made by 

moves perpendicular to the direction NASA

of the wave 2. The full name of the X-59

7. Type of wave where the disturbance 3. The first “A” in NASA

moves in the same direction as the 4. The X-59 is designed to lower the 

wave noise associated with supersonic flight 

8. The number of waves that pass a point to a quieter “sonic ___.” 

in a certain amount of time 5. Every sound is produced by ___. 

9. Very loud sound created when aircraft 6. Scientists use ___ tunnels to test how 

besides the X-59 fly faster than the models of aircraft will perform in 

speed of sound flight. 

12. Faster than the speed of sound 8. The X-59 will test the technology to 

13. Data collected about the X-59 will fly ___, quieter and more efficiently. 

allow supersonic flight over ___. 10. The material through which a sound 

wave moves

11. The X-59 will fly over several U.S. 

cities to help NASA collect data on 

sound levels and the reaction of ___. 

Crossword Puzzle Word List

• Aeronautics • Longitudinal • Thump

• Faster • Medium • Transverse

• Frequency • QueSST • Vibrations

• Humans • Sonic boom • Wind 

• Land • Supersonic • X plane
Excalibur Almaz, Inc. Commercial Crew Development Round 2 (CCDev2) Space Act Agreement

NNK11MS07S

EAI CCDev2 Space Act Agreement

EAI SAA Amendment 01
# Frank Borman in Visual Docking Simulator

Astronaut Frank Borman at the controls of the Visual Docking Simulator. From A.W. Vogeley, "Piloted Space-Flight Simulation at Langley Research Center," Paper presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 1966 Winter Meeting, New York, NY, November 27-December 1, 1966. "This facility was [later known as the Visual-Optical Simulator.] It presents to the pilot an out-the-window view of his target in correct 6 degrees of freedom motion. The scene is obtained by a television camera pick-up viewing a small-scale gimbaled model of the target." "For docking studies, the docking target picture was projected onto the surface of a 20-foot-diameter sphere and the pilot could, effectively, maneuver into contract. this facility was used in a comparison study with the Rendezvous Docking Simulator - one of the few comparison experiments in which conditions were carefully controlled and a reasonable sample of pilots used. All pilots preferred the more realistic RDS visual scene. The pilots generally liked the RDS angular motion cues although some objected to the false gravity cues that these motions introduced. Training time was shorter on the RDS, but final performance on both simulators was essentially equal. " "For station-keeping studies, since close approach is not required, the target was presented to the pilot through a virtual-image system which projects his view to infinity, providing a more realistic effect. In addition to the target, the system also projects a star and horizon background. "

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-lrc-1963-b701_p-09368/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 30, 1963ProducerLRCImage CreditNASA Bob NyeSize1919x1558pxPIA NumberLRC-1963-B701_P-09368The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								May 03, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Order entered February 1 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01101
- CV MICHAEL HILL, Appellant
V. SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 10
- 04535 

### O RDER By postcard dated November 1, 2012, we notified the court reporter for the 162nd Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we have received no reponse. Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Sheretta Martin to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification th at appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
3 min read

# NASA Television to Broadcast Next Space Station Crew Launch, Docking

### NASA

Sep 20, 2019

MEDIA ADVISORYM19-099

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credits: NASA/Victor Zelentsov**

A multinational crew, including NASA astronaut Jessica Meir and the first space traveler from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), is scheduled to launch to the International Space Station Wednesday, Sept. 25. NASA Television and the agency’s website will provide live coverage of the crew’s launch and arrival.

Meir, Oleg Skripochka of the Russian space agency Roscosmos, and Hazzaa Ali Almansoori from the UAE are set to launch at 9:57 a.m. EDT (6:57 p.m. Kazakhstan time) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan aboard the Soyuz MS-15 spacecraft.

The four-orbit, six-hour journey will be the third spaceflight for Skripochka and the first for Meir and Almansoori. Almansoori is flying on an eight-day mission as a spaceflight participant under a contract between the UAE and Roscosmos.

The new crew members will dock to the station’s Zvezda service module at 3:45 p.m.

About two hours after docking, hatches between the Soyuz and the station will open and the new residents will be greeted by station commander Alexey Ovchinin of Roscosmos, NASA astronauts Christina Koch, Nick Hague and Andrew Morgan, ESA (European Space Agency) astronaut Luca Parmitano, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Alexander Skvortsov.

Their arrival will increase the orbiting laboratory’s population to nine people until Oct. 3, when Hague and Ovchinin, who are completing a mission of more than 200 days, will return to Earth with Almansoori on the Soyuz MS-12 spacecraft. Meir and Skripochka will spend more than six months on the station.

Coverage of launch and docking activities is as follows (all times EDT):
            - 9 a.m. – Soyuz MS-15 launch coverage
            - 3 p.m. – Docking coverage
            - 5 p.m. – Hatch opening and welcome coverage

The crew will continue work on hundreds of experiments in biology, biotechnology, physical science and Earth science aboard humanity’s only permanently occupied microgravity laboratory.

Check out the full NASA TV schedule, and video streaming information, at:

**https://www.nasa.gov/nasatv**

Get breaking news, images and features from the station on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook.

-end-

Stephanie SchierholzHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100stephanie.schierholz@nasa.govCourtney BeasleyJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111courtney.m.beasley@nasa.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18U.s.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Lion-Gri International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, the undersigned,
Maria Gracia Rosales, the President and Chairman of the Board, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and
belief:

1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:   April 18, 2006

/s/  Maria Gracia Rosales
--------------------------------
President and Chairman of the Board