alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Payload Specialist Bio: Eugene H. Trinh 4/96

file:///jsc-ird-uweb/jscextern/Bios/PS/trinh.html[5/3/2017 8:21:32 PM]

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

EUGENE H. TRINH (PH.D.)

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

PERSONAL DATA: Born September 14, 1950, in Saigon,Vietnam; was raised from the age of two in Paris, France

and has lived in the United States since 1968. Currently a resident of Culver City, California. Married to the former

Yvette Fabry. Recreational interests include house remodeling, music, theatre, tennis, swimming, vollyball, soccer,

hiking, and photography. His parents, Mr. and Mrs. Trinh, reside in Nice, France. Her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Fabry,

reside in Paris, France.

EDUCATION: Secondary education: graduated from Lycee Michelet, Paris, France with a Baccalauret degree in 1968.

Received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering-Applied Physics from Columbia University in 1972;

Masters of Science and of Philosophy and a Doctorate of Philosophy in Applied Physics from Yale University in 1974,

1975, and 1977 respectively.

ORGANIZATIONS: Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sigma Xi

Research Society, American Society of Mechanical Engineering, American Physical Society.

PUBLICATIONS: Published over 40 reviewed articles and authored as many conference papers in the areas of Fluid

Dynamics, Acoustics, Materials Science, and Microgravity science and technology.

SPECIAL HONORS:

Full tuition Scholarship (Columbia University)

Sheffield Fellowship (Yale University)

Group Achievement award NASA for flight experiments

Science Achievement award for Principal Investigator team NASA

NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal

NASA Flight Medal

RESEARCH ACTIVITIES: 1979 - Present -- Physical acoustics, fluid dynamics and containerless materials

processing. Development of high intensity acoustic levitation devices and experimental instrumentation and

measurement techniques for fluid dynamics experiments as well as high temperature materials processing experiments

in ground based laboratory and in low gravity. Development of shuttle flight experiments, and participation in both

Spacelab flight mission support activities as well as flight crew training. Alternate Payload Specialist (APS) on Spacelab

3 mission (May 1985). Research Task Manager and Project Scientist for Drop Physics Module flight experiments.

NASA investigator in Fluid Physics, Biotechnology, and Materials Science.

OTHER EXPERIENCE: Development and operation of low-gravity experimental apparatuses for tests in the NASA

KC-135 airplane. An accumulated low gravity time of about 25 hours (at 0.05 G) has been obtained since 1983.

Dr. Trinh was a member of the crew of Space Shuttle Columbia for STS-50/United States Microgravity Laboratory-1

(USML-1) Spacelab mission.

APRIL 1996
Payload Specialist Bio: Eugene H. Trinh 4/96

file:///jsc-ird-uweb/jscextern/Bios/PS/trinh.html[5/3/2017 8:21:32 PM]
August 19, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WANDA KAY COHEN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00634

- CV v

. LANDRY’ S, INC., LANDRY'S CR AB SHACK, INC., AND LANDRY'S SEAFOOD & OYSTER BAR

- KEMAH, INC. , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Landry's, Inc., Landry ’s Crab Shack, Inc., and Landry’ s Seafood & Oyster Bar

- Kemah, Inc., signed June 6, 2013 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in its judgment as to appellant Wanda Kay Cohen’s premises liability claim . We therefor e order that the portions of the judgment on the pre mises liability claim are REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for proceedings in accordance with this court's opinion. Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED

. We order appellee s , Landry's, Inc., Landry's Cr ab Shack, Inc., and Landry's Seafood & Oyster Bar

- Kemah, Inc., jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Payload Specialist Astronaut Bio: Ilan Ramon 5/04

file:///jsc-ird-uweb/jscextern/Bios/PS/ramon.html[5/3/2017 8:21:32 PM]

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

ILAN RAMON (COLONEL, ISRAEL AIR FORCE)

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

PERSONAL DATA: Born June 20,1954 in Tel Aviv, Israel. Died on February 1, 2003 over the southern United States

when Space Shuttle Columbia and the crew perished during entry, 16 minutes prior to scheduled landing. He is survived

by his wife Rona and their four children. He enjoyed snow skiing, squash.

EDUCATION: Graduated from High School in 1972; bachelor of science degree in electronics and computer

engineering from the University of Tel Aviv, Israel, in 1987.

AWARDS: Posthumously awarded the Congressional Space Medal of Honor, the NASA Space Flight Medal, and the

Distinguished Public Service Medal.

SPECIAL HONORS: Yom Kippur War (1973); Operation Peace for Galilee (1982); F-16 1,000 Flight Hours (1992).

EXPERIENCE: In 1974, Ramon graduated as a fighter pilot from the Israel Air Force (IAF) Flight School. From 1974-

1976 he participated in A-4 Basic Training and Operations. 1976-1980 was spent in Mirage III-C training and

operations. In 1980, as one of the IAF’s establishment team of the first F-16 Squadron in Israel, he attended the F-16

Training Course at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. From 1981-1983, he served as the Deputy Squadron Commander B, F-16

Squadron. From 1983-1987, he attended the University of Tel Aviv. From 1988-1990, he served as Deputy Squadron

Commander A, F-4 Phantom Squadron. During 1990, he attended the Squadron Commanders Course. From 1990-1992,

he served as Squadron Commander, F-16 Squadron. From 1992-1994, he was Head of the Aircraft Branch in the

Operations Requirement Department. In 1994, he was promoted to the rank of Colonel and assigned as Head of the

Department of Operational Requirement for Weapon Development and Acquisition. He stayed at this post until 1998./

Colonel Ramon accumulated over 3,000 flight hours on the A-4, Mirage III-C, and F-4, and over 1,000 flight hours on

the F-16.

NASA EXPERIENCE: In 1997, Colonel Ramon was selected as a Payload Specialist. He was designated to train as

prime for a Space Shuttle mission with a payload that included a multispectral camera for recording desert aerosol. In

July 1998, he reported for training at the Johnson Space Center, Houston, where he trained until 2003. He flew aboard

STS-107, logging 15 days, 22 hours and 20 minutes in space.

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE: STS-107 Columbia (January 16 to February 1, 2003). The 16-day flight was a

dedicated science and research mission. Working 24 hours a day, in two alternating shifts, the crew successfully

conducted approximately 80 experiments. The STS-107 mission ended abruptly on February 1, 2003 when Space

Shuttle Columbia and the crew perished during entry, 16 minutes before scheduled landing.

MAY 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67698-67699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27770]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2010-0022]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
3, 2010.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Leading Edge Supply Chain Survey; OMB 
Number 0701-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.

[[Page 67699]]

    Number of Respondents: 818.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 818.
    Average Burden per Response: 45 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 614 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This study seeks to uncover the emerging trends in 
supply chain management (SCM) practices, processes and metrics that 
could be beneficial to the Department of Defense, with particular 
emphasis on the U.S. Air Force.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: October 22, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-27770 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
#### Edward GATHRIGHT, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON, a municipal corporation; et al., Defendants—Appellants.

No. 03-35432.

D.C. No. CV-03-00130-HA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Kelly E. Ford, Herbert G. Grey, Attorney at Law, Beaverton, OR, John M. Lotz, Aliso Veijo, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Harry Michael Auerbach, Office of The City Attorney, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

This preliminary injunction appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit *811Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We subject a district court’s order regarding preliminary injunctive relief only to limited review. *Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.,*198 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir.1999). A decision regarding a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs only if the district court based its decision on either an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings. *Id.*

We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion here. We therefore affirm the district court’s order granting the preliminary injunction. Our disposition will affect the rights of the parties only until the district court renders final judgment. *Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International, Inc.,*686 F.2d 750, 752 (9th Cir.1982).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Leaphardt *v.*Sloan.

In a suit by *Jonathan*Leaphardt, the declaration alleged that the defendant, by his promissory note, promised to pay the plaintiff by the name of *Jonathan T-ieaphat*the sum of, &c. *Held,*that the allegation was not objectionable.

*279If the plaintiff allege that a promissory note was made payable to him, and on proof of the instrument it appears to have been made to another, it is no variance if the plaintiff show that he was the person really meant.

Thursday, *May*28.

ERROR to the *Wayne*Circuit Court.

*M. M. Ray,*for the plaintiff.

*C. II. Test,*for the defendant.

Sullivan, J.

Debt. The plaintiff declared that the defendant on, &c., at, &c., made his promissory note in writing, by which he promised to pay to the plaintiff, by the name of *Jonathan Leaphat,*the sum of 104 dollars and 50 cents, and then and there delivered the said note to the plaintiff, &c. General demurrer and judgment for the defendant.

If a person execute a written promise by a wrong name, he must be sued by that name. He is estopped from denying the name by which he executed the promise to be his true name. *Wooster*v. *Lyons, Nov.*term, 1838 (1). But if a promise, be made to a person by a wrong name, the promisee may sue upon that promise in his right name, and aver himself to be the person intended. And a' plaintiff suing upon a promissory note, which purports to be payable to a person of a different name, may show by evidence that he was the person intended. *Willis*v. *Barrett,*2 Stark. Rep. 29.—*The New-York Af. Soc., &c.*v. *Varick et al.*13 Johns. Rep. *38.*—Moller v. *Lambert,*2 Camp. 548.—*Bass*v. *Clive,*4 M. & S. 13. *Starkie,*in his Treatise on Evidence, part 4th, page 1579, on reference to the authorities cited above, says, “ if a plaintiff allege that a promissory note was made payable to him, and on proof of the instrument it appears to have been made to another, it is no variance if the plaintiff show that he was the person really meant, for that is the legal effect.”

We think the declaration was sufficient, and that the demurrer should have been overruled.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 Ante, p. 60.
#### PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PHYLLIS LUCAS.

May 2, 1978.

Petitions for certification granted. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*332)
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1904

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 400

North Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Wilkie

D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1904 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 400 North

3 Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United

11 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate March 12, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1904

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 400 North Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida,as the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United StatesCourthouse’’.
Dressing for 

Altitude

History of Flight

Parts of an 

Airplane

Principles of 

Flight

Structures and 

Materials

Propulsion

Future Flight

Careers in 

Aeronautics

Airspace

GRADES K-12

www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/mib.htm

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NP-2015-06-1909-HQ
#### Fred Lee *v.*Commonwealth.

Betting on Elections — Indictment.

“ It is not a penal offense under any statute to bet that a certain individual will not be elected to a certain office at a certain election, unless he be a candidate for that office, or is voted for to fill it, or is intended or expected to be voted for, or is expected to be a candidate for it.”

Instructions.

Where the averments of an indictment are not supported by the evidence the court should instruct for defendant.

Same.

An instruction that “ if the jury believe from the testimony, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant agreed to give Carter a cow in the event of Morrow’s election, and said Carter was to give defendant a cow in the event of Ingram’s election, and such election was held, they should find defendant guilty of betting on the election, unless the jury should believe the bet was withdrawn or annulled before the election.” *Meld*to be erroneous.

APPEAL EROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

June 8, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

Tbe proper and essential averments are made in tbe indictment, that there was a pending election for State senator, and that Morrow was a candidate for said office, and that appellant bet a cow worth $20 that said Morrow would not be elected, and by promising to give to McCarter a cow if said Morrow was elected.

We think that this is but one of the many forms to evade the statute against betting on elections, and comes fully within the letter and spirit of the enactment, as said by this court in Commonwealth *v.*Strouse, 16 B. Mon. 328.

But, as also said in that case, *“*it is not a penal offense, under any statute, to bet that a certain individual will not be elected to a certain office at a certain election, unless he be a candidate for that office, or is voted for to fill it, or is intended or expected to be voted for, or is expected to be a candidate for it.”

The essential averment that Morrow was a candidate for State senator is totally unsupported by the evidence; even with the *244utmost liberality of construction, it does not show that he was either a candidate, expected to be, or that any one expected to vote for him, or did vote for him for said office.

The court, therefore, should have instructed the jury, as asked for by the defendant in the first instruction refused, “ to find for the defendant because the facts proven do not constitute a bet or wager within the meaning of the law,” and should have refused the instruction granted at the instance of the Commonwealth, that *“*If the jury believe from the testimony, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant agreed to give William Carter a cow in the event of Morrow’s election, and said Carter was to give defendant a cow in the event of Ingram’s election, and such election was held, they should find defendant guilty of betting on the election unless the jury should believe the bet was withdrawn or annulled before the election.”

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATON OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, the (“Report”),I, Catherine M. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/Catherine M. Davidson


Catherine M. Davidson


Controller


(Principal Financial Officer)








August 16, 2010




















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.15
                                                                   -------------


                 SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                 ----------------------------------------------

     The  Deferred  Compensation  Plan  adopted  by  Pentastar  Services,  Inc.,
predecessor to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.  ("DTAG"),  on December 28,
1994, as amended by Amendment to Deferred  Compensation  Plan adopted by DTAG on
September  29, 1998 (the "PLAN") is hereby  amended as of September  23, 1999 as
follows:

     1.  The  "INTRODUCTION"  to  the  Plan  is  hereby amended  by  adding  the
following new paragraph at the end:

         "The Plan is  intended  to be  exempt  under ERISA Section 401(a)(1)."

     2.  Section  7.1  of  the  Plan  is  hereby  amended by  deleting the first
sentence of the fourth paragraph in its entirety.



                                       -1-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary David LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-31166

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 28, 2003.

Cristina Walker, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca L. Hudsmith, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Gary David Lindsey appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of d-methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the district court, after hearing testimony, accepted the law enforcement agent’s version of events over that of Lindsey and his wife, finding that no coercion took place and that Lindsey’s confession was voluntary. We will not disturb the district court’s findings absent clear error. *See United States v. Restrepo,*994 F.2d 173, 183 (5th Cir.1993). If a finding is based on oral testimony at a suppression hearing, the “clearly erroneous standard is particularly strong since the judge had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witnesses.” *See United States v. Shabazz,*993 F.2d 431, 438 (5th Cir.1993). Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in determining that the confession was voluntarily given. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

LOREN W. ACTON (PH.D.)

PAYLOAD SPECIALIST

PERSONAL DATA: Born March 7, 1936, in Lewiston, Montana. Married. Two

children.

EDUCATION: Received a bachelor of science degree from Montana State University

in 1959, and a doctor of philosophy from the University of Colorado in 1965.

ORGANIZATIONS: American Astronomical Society, International Astronomical

Union, Sigma Chi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, the American Association for

the Advancement of Science, and Tau Beta Pi.

EXPERIENCE: Dr. Acton is the senior staff scientist with the Space Sciences

Laboratory, Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratory, California. As a research

scientist, his principle duties included conducting scientific studies of the Sun and other celestial objects using advanced

space instruments and serving as a co-investigator on one of the Spacelab 2 solar experiments, the Solar Optical

Universal Polarimeter. In 1985, he was a payload specialist on STS-51F/ Spacelab-2. At mission conclusion, Dr. Acton

had traveled over 2.8 million miles in 126 Earth orbits, logging over 190 hours in space.

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE: STS-51F/Spacelab-2 Challenger (July 29 to August 6, 1985) was launched from

Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and returned to land at Edwards Air Force Base, California. STS-51F was the first

pallet-only Spacelab mission, and the first mission to operate the Spacelab Instrument Pointing System (IPS). It carried

13 major experiments in astronomy, astrophysics, and life sciences. Mission duration was 7 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes

and 26.

AUGUST 1985

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.