alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           18999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    73278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      98303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                270941
<PP&E>                                          533473
<DEPRECIATION>                                  271485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  708104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           113020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                      440518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    708104
<SALES>                                         536279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                536279
<CGS>                                           418281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   486831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (62)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5502)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  44008
<INCOME-TAX>                                     17500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              26508
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (75033)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48525)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRESH
CHOICE, INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 23, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-23-1997
<CASH>                                           5,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      188
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,139
<PP&E>                                          40,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,071
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,978)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,098
<SALES>                                         16,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,106
<CGS>                                            4,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Telkonet Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Mushrush, Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Telkonet, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard E. Mushrush


Richard E. Mushrush


Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer


March 29, 2011
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Toyota Motor Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that, to such officers knowledge:

1. The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/    FUJIO CHOName:

Fujio ChoTitle:

Chairman of the BoardDate: June 25, 2008By:

/s/    MITSUO KINOSHITAName:

Mitsuo KinoshitaTitle:

Executive Vice President, Member of the BoardDate: June 25, 2008


(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Toyota Motor
Corporation and will be retained by Toyota Motor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
Slip Op. 01-1 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

____________________________________ : FAG ITALIA S.p.A., BARDEN : CORPORATION (U.K.) LIMITED, : THE BARDEN CORPORATION and : FAG BEARINGS CORPORATION, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Court No. 98-07-02528 : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : ____________________________________: J U D G M E N T This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, FAG Italia S.p.A., The Barden Corporation (U.K.) Ltd., The Barden Corporation and FAG Bearings Corporation v. United States , 24 CIT ___, 110 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (2000) (“Remand Results”), Torrington’s comments to the Remand Results, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand, and no other responses to the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on November 2, 2000 are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

_________________________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge Dated: January 9, 2001 New York, New York
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 24, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-14934 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:97-cr-06063-KLR-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BARBARA ANN MURRAY, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(April 24, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
In May 2000, Barbara Murray was convicted of multiple violations of 18

U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) for engaging with Richard Adam and

others in “a scheme to defraud people seeking venture capital loans. In exchange

for advance payment of a substantial fee, Adam and his associates falsely promised

to obtain multimillion dollar loans for would-be borrowers.” United States v.

Murray, 154 Fed. Appx. 740, 742 (11th Cir. 2005).1

 On appeal, we affirmed

Murray’s convictions, but, on the Government’s cross-appeal, we vacated her

sentences and remanded for resentencing. Id. at 747. On April 19, 2006, Murray

was resentenced to concurrent terms of 12 months and one day, with a three-year

term of supervised release. 

In April 2006, Murray moved the district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to

vacate her convictions; the court denied her motion, and we declined to issue a

certificate of appealability to allow her to appeal the denial. She moved the court

for § 2255 relief again, on June 24, 2010, claiming that she was innocent of the

crimes for which she had been convicted and, moreover, that the Government had

improperly withheld evidence of her innocence. A magistrate judge recommended

that the district court deny the motion as successive, but the court has not acted on

the recommendation. Then, on September 7, 2011, Murray moved the court,

1

 Our mandate issued on February 23, 2006.

2
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3), to set aside her convictions

on the ground that they had been obtained by the Government by fraud. In the

same document, she moved the court to grant her a new trial pursuant to Federal

Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(a). The court denied both motions, and Murray

appeals the rulings.

Murray’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion was untimely, since it was filed more than

one year after the conclusion of her trial. The district court therefore lacked

jurisdiction to consider it. Murray’s Rule 33(a) motion was also untimely, as it

was filed more than three years after the verdicts of guilty. See Rule 33(b). Hence,

the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain that motion. And if construed as

motions for § 2255 relief, the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the two

motions because they would be successive. Murray must, instead, move this court

for leave to file a successive motion. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h), 22(b)(3).

AFFIRMED.

3
HOPE COLLEGE, HOLLAND MI

Linking Student Driven Data to NASA Data: 

Authentic Air Quality Data Inquiry for 

Improved Student Self-Efficacy

Susan Ipri Brown 

2/01/22 - 1/31/24

Portable air quality monitors will be provided to West 

Michigan middle and high schools with high 

percentages of students at lower socioeconomic status 

and from non-majority ethnicities, enhancing students’ 

ability to participate in authentic data analysis through 

exploration of local and national atmospheric data. The 

project curriculum focuses on guiding students through 

the research process including writing a non-trivial 

research question, determining data collection 

protocols, analyzing data, and presenting the work. 

Students are engaged with authentic data as a means 

for inquiry-based lessons versus a specific content 

area, creating a curriculum that is flexible for 

multidisciplinary and multi-age level applications. The 

curriculum will also be made available for any remote 

classroom. 

List of Partners:

• Allegan, Fennville, Grand Rapids, Holland, and

West Ottawa Public Schools

ExploreHope student Levi works with a piece of 

equipment

Credits: Hope College

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0447, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNT Y, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 20th day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Julio Perez, Jr., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al., Appellees No. 06

- 14

- 00065

- CV

Trial Court N o. 13C1819

- 005

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Julio Perez, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justi ce of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 21st day of May , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Rohit Patel, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of English Language
Learning and Instruction System, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                              /s/ Rohit Patel
Date: March 28, 2005          ____________________________________
                              Rohit Patel
                              Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         8,081
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,253
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,681
<PP&E>                                         135,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 98,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,683
<BONDS>                                        107,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,158
<OTHER-SE>                                     63,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,544
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,780
<CGS>                                          107,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

OHIOAstronauts

CLEVELAND 

Kenneth D. Cameron•James A. Lovell, Jr. 

G. David Low•Ronald M. Sega WILLOUGHBY 

Donald A. Thomas•Carl E. Walz Gregory J. Harbaugh 

Mary Ellen Weber EUCLID Sunita L. Williams 

WOODVILLE CLEVELAND 

Terence T. Henricks 

WESTLAKE BROADVIEW HEIGHTS WARREN Robert F. Overmyer Michael T. Good Ronald A. Parise 

AKRON Judith A. Resnik 

WADSWORTH Michael J. Foreman 

ASHLAND Robert C. Springer 

MANSFIELD Michael L. Gernhardt 

WAPAKONETA Neil A. Armstrong 

TROY Nancy J. Currie-Gregg CAMBRIDGE John H. Glenn 

COLUMBUS Donn F. Eisele•Thomas J. Hennen 

FAIRBORN Gregory H. Johnson 

DAYTON Charles A. Bassett II 

CINCINNATI Karl G. Henize 

NUMBER OF ASTRONAUTS FROM OHIO25 

★ Guion S. Bluford, Jr. ★ Mark N. Brown HONORARY ★ Kathryn D. Sullivan ★ Kevin R. Kregel Ohio ASTRONAUTS 

www.nasa.gov
EVA

Firsts

7 8 AIRCRAF

H

T 

AVE

COM

IAL, MILITARY, OR

ET

M

A

E

IV

R

R

C

P

PILOT EXPERIENCE 

Extravehicular Activity S P A C E W A L K S 

Number of 

EVAs 

Sunita L. Williams 

 Michael J. Foreman 

Michael T. Good 

 Michael L. Gernhardt 4 

Carl E. Walz 

 Gregory J. Harbaugh 

G. David Low 

 Kathryn D. Sullivan 

Neil A. Armstrong 

7 

5 

4 

Cumulative 

Duration of EVAs 

★ 50 hr, 40 min

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 32 hr, 19 min 

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 29 hr, 53 min 

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 23 hr, 16 min 

3 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 18 hr, 55 min 

3 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 18 hr, 29 min 

1 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 5 hr, 55 min 

1 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 3 hr, 29 min 

1 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ 2 hr, 30 min 

TRIPS to the MOON 

DAYS in Space

22,000 HOURS

 have been logged in space by Ohio astronauts 

(917DAYS) Sunita L. Williams 

leads the pack with 322 days in space

and counting 

TOTAL 

STS

had an 

–

70

ALL-OHIO CREW 

• John H. Glenn—First American in Earth orbit (1962) 

• Neil A. Armstrong—Piloted first docking in space 

(1966), first person to land a spacecraft on the Moon 

(1969), first person to walk on the Moon (1969) 

• James A. Lovell, Jr.—First man to fly to the Moon 

 twice (1968 and 1970) 

• Guion S. Bluford—First African-American to go to 

 space (1983) 

• Kathryn D. Sullivan—First American woman to walk in 

 space (1984) 

• Michael L. Gernhardt—First U.S. spacewalk from the 

 International Space Station (2001) 

S P A C E F L I G H T S 86% 

PS–002612–0219
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Rohit Patel, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of English Language
Learning and Instruction System, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                              /s/ Rohit Patel
Date: April 19, 2005          ____________________________________
                              Rohit Patel
                              Principal Executive Officer