alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,275                  21,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,013                   6,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                       432                      47
<INVENTORY>                                      8,157                   4,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,086                  34,804
<PP&E>                                          12,197                   9,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,296                   3,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,624                  48,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,598                   5,788
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            13                      11
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,187                  41,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,624                  48,366
<SALES>                                         33,045                  22,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,045                  22,425
<CGS>                                           10,233                   7,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,233                   7,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,628                  15,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   130                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,250                 (1,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,250                 (1,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,250                 (1,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F1>               (.08)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22                   (.08)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the following Registration Statements: 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-165445) of eDiets.com, Inc.,

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115372) of eDiets.com, Inc., 

(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-168874) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, and 

(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90046) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Stock Option Plan; 

of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eDiets.com, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

Boca Raton, Florida 

March 31, 2011
#### M. Whitt *v.*Commonwealth.

Larceny.

A mare was forced out of the immediate possession of the owner and escaped to the commons, and was afterward taken away by intimidator. Held, that this was larceny and not robbery.

APPEAL EROM MORGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 28, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams :

Although it might have been a robbery and not a larceny had the appellant and his confederates forced the mare alleged to have been stolen out of the immediate possession of her owner, especially under the intimidation, violence, and threatenings proven, yet as the mare during the disturbance had broken away from the person holding her and escaped to the commons where Whitt and his associates afterward captured her, we think a conviction for the larceny was entirely proper.

The taking, when it was really consummated, was not from the person or dwelling of the owner, nor by putting him or any one else in fear. Had the parties succeeded in their first attempt to *186
      *get the*mare it would clearly have been a robbery, but when they did succeed the mare was not in the immediate possession of any one, neither was any one then put in fear, nor violence or intimidation toward any one an attendant circumstance.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed, as we perceive no error in giving or refusing instructions.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4955

_____________________________

DENNIS LONG,

Appellant,

v.

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

May 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Mobley v. McNeil, 989 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2008).

WOLF, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Dennis Long, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen Lonergan, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,752-01

EX P ARTE CLONE KINSEY, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1650087-A IN THE 228TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Ap p l i ca nt was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to 32 y ea rs ’ imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he did not rec eive timely notice from the appellate court or counsel notify ing him of the dispositi o n o f h i s appea l and informing him of his rig ht to file a petition for discretionar

y revie w (P DR). He states t hat he would have f iled a PDR if he had be en aw are of hi s rig hts. He aver s that he is entitled to an out-of-time PDR. Ex parte Florentino, 206 S.W .3d 124, 125 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial court has dete rm i n ed that Applicant was denied the r ight to file a pro se PDR through no f ault of his own.2

Relief is g rante d. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W .3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (“I n this case , t h er e wa s a brea

kdown in the sy stem, and due proce ss require s that Applicant be permitted to exercise his statutory rig ht to file a petition for discretionar y revie w.”) Applicant may file an out-oftime PDR of the judgme nt of the First Court of Appea ls in cause number 01-20-00088- CR. Should Applicant decide to file a PDR, he must file it with this Court within thirty day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D e p a r tm e nt o f Crim in al J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles. Deliver ed: May

17, 2023 Do not publish
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Rohit Patel, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of English
Language Learning and Instruction System, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                              /s/ Rohit Patel
Date: October 26, 2004        ____________________________________
                              Rohit Patel
                              Principal Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

UNIT 82 JOINT VENTURE,

FIVE STAR HOLDING COMPANY,

INC., FIVE STAR HOLDING

MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., AND

1320/1390 DON HASKINS, LTC.,

Appellants,

v.

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL

BANK OF CHINA, LOS ANGELES

BRANCH, MAYNARDS INDUSTRIES

(1991) INC. D/B/A MAYNARDS

INDUSTRIES, LTD., AND

ROBB EVANS, RECEIVER FOR

MEDIACOPY TEXAS, INC.,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00088

- CV

Appeal from

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2005

- 1987)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that

Appellees recover from Appellants and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43 .5, on the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMB ER , 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rivera, J., not participating)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM WORLDTEX,
INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  MARCH 31,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                            MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        4,337
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                42,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  2,564
<INVENTORY>                                                  37,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             84,560
<PP&E>                                                      121,298
<DEPRECIATION>                                               34,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              203,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        32,581
<BONDS>                                                      71,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                        147
<OTHER-SE>                                                   81,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                203,037
<SALES>                                                      50,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             50,918
<CGS>                                                        41,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                41,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            1,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               4,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  1,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           2,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  2,666
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   .18
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

ADT HOLDINGS, INC.; ADT 

SECURITY SERVICES, INC.; 

AUTOMATED SECURITY CORP., 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

v. 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 13-1314 

(D.C. No. 1:11-CV-00832-RPM) 

(D. Colo.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss is granted. See 10th Cir. 

R. 27.3(A)(9) and Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b). 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

April 1, 2016

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 13-1314 Document: 01019595932 Date Filed: 04/01/2016 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQUIMED, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,131
<PP&E>                                          23,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,581
<BONDS>                                         19,829
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,989
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,188
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (89)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 19, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JERRY MASKE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

VALERIE ESTRADA; THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF COLORADO,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-1174

(D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00835-ZLW)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Appellant’s failure to file a petition to

proceed pro se, in accordance with the court’s April 29, 2010 order. Our April 29

order directed Appellant to file within 14 days a fully compliant petition for leave

to proceed pro se in light of the filing restrictions order entered in Maske v.

Murphy, No. 09-1536, 2010 WL 529801 (10th Cir. Feb. 16, 2010).

The April 29 order advised Appellant that any defect in compliance with

the filing restrictions would be grounds for dismissal for failure to prosecute

pursuant to Tenth Circuit Rule 42.1. (4/29/10 Order at 2.) Appellant initially

submitted numerous letters to this court. We notified him by order dated May 5,

2010, that these letters did not satisfy the requirements of a petition to proceed

Appellate Case: 10-1174 Document: 01018425304 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 Page: 1 
2

pro se. He has since submitted additional letters, but none complies with the

filing restrictions. See Maske v. Murphy, No. 09-1536, 2010 WL 529801 (10th

Cir. Feb. 16, 2010). The time to file a compliant petition has expired. Therefore,

this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. 10th Cir. R. 42.1. A copy of this

order will stand as the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Lara Smith

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1174 Document: 01018425304 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 Page: 2
ALLAN M. RUSH,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3750

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Allan M. Rush, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27256]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


ITS Joint Program Office; IntelliDrive\SM\ Mobility and 
Environment Workshop; Notice of Workshop

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office (ITS 
JPO) will host a free two-day public workshop to discuss the 
IntelliDrive\SM\ Real-Time Data Capture and Management and Dynamic 
Mobility Applications (DMA) research programs on November 30 and 
December 1, 2010 at the George Mason University Arlington Campus. The 
goal of this listening session is to inform and communicate with 
stakeholders interested in the data capture and dynamic mobility 
components of the IntelliDrive program. IntelliDrive is a multimodal 
research initiative that is based on wireless Vehicle to Vehicle, 
(V2V), Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) communications which will 
improve traffic safety and mobility while helping the environment.
    The public meeting will feature background on the IntelliDrive 
Real-Time Data Capture and Management and DMA programs; information 
about the IntelliDrive program's concepts, organization, schedule, 
projects, procurements, and products; and how the IntelliDrive program 
plans to engage stakeholders in the future. Additional discussions will 
include cross-cutting policy issues; details of the IntelliDrive 
program's open data environment and its open source mobility 
applications; results of a recent request for information where 
stakeholders submitted the top dynamic mobility application concepts; 
information about upcoming procurements and other opportunities to 
participate in the development of IntelliDrive; and an opportunity to 
discuss how improved mobility and efficient travel can support the 
environment and mitigate pollution.
    Please contact Nicole Oliphant at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe1e0e3e6ffe7eee1fbcfe6fbfceea1e0fde8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d636261647d656c63794d64797e6c23627f6a">[email protected]</span></a> by November 
26, 2010 to complete your free registration. Additional information, 
including meeting times and agenda details may be found at the ITS JPO 
Web site: http://www.its.dot.gov/press/announcement/mobility_workshop.htm.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 21st day of October 2010.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-27256 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD BRUCE ROSENTHAL.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.