alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


THE CHINA STATE BANK, LTD.

Our Ref: F/0145/98KT                              CONFIDENTIAL
Date:  27th July 1998

Messrs. Celebrity Exports International Limited
12/F.,
Empire Centre,
68 Mody Road,
Tsim Sha Tsui East,
Kowloon.

Dear Sirs,

BANKING FACILITIES

We are pleased to inform you that the banking facilities are made available to
you on the terms and conditions as follows:

FACILITIES

Export Line for negotiation of the bills under L/C with discrepancy and/or
purchase of D/P & D/A (Tenor: up to 60 days) bills to the extent of
HKD10,000,000.00, additional limit of HKD4,000,000.00 will only be available
later. Drawing limit for purchase of D/P & D/A bills is 90% of the amount of the
bills deposited & acceptable to us.

SECURITIES

Guarantee for HKD50,000,000.00 given by Celebrity Inc. with legal opinion from
legal advisor of U.S.A. should be obtained & acceptable to us.
ECIC insurance policy should be lodged with us.

FEES

1.   Handling charge for HKD6,000.00 will be charged upon granting the
     facilities.

2.   Annual renewal fee for HKD6,000.00 will be charged.

3.   Legal fee for preparation of the Guarantee and the legal opinion will be
     charged by the relevant solicitors.

The fees quoted above are subject to fluctuation at our discretion.
Notwithstanding the foregoing arrangement, all facilities are subject to our
periodic review and overriding right of repayment on demand.

The availability of all facilities is subject to completion of all necessary
security documentation and resolution to our satisfaction.

Please sign and return to us the copy of this letter to signify your acceptance
of the above terms and conditions.

We are pleased to be of service and hoping for a close relationship with you.

Yours faithfully,
For THE CHINA STATE BANK, LTD.              Confirmed by:
Hong Kong Branch
                                                For and on behalf of
                                            CELEBRITY EXPORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD.

  /s/ TANG KWOK FU                              /s/    RICHARD YUEN
---------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Authorized Signature                        
MT/LAM/pry


39 - 41.  Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong.            Tel.: 28419333
           Telex: 73410 KHWAB HX       Cable: 4999      Telefax:  (852) 28450584
EXHIBIT 31.2

SPORT-HALEY, INC.

CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick W. Hurley, Chief Financial Officer of Sport-Haley, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sport-Haley, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 25, 2005

|/s/PATRICK W. HURLEYPatrick W. Hurley
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
TO tetaoKWb tofc. NoeJt ftuogk.; -315/2015 -w\<jovrL or, iV sUijj, oP m\j «x;V oP (kJDMJ. (Vpas,- wCt. •». 3013127-.*- 

### oU/xwd so ^ \ ^ ~ftllo*» +Wu proper woadum. 1u»JWLdWfS

MARC»r: AbelAcosfa,Cterk cnr
# Sitemap

## September 01, 1974

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1974
- 09
- September 01, 1974

            - September 1974 – Viking Program Established
<PAGE>   1
                                                             EXHIBIT 10.37(a)

                        [ALTERA CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]



August 20, 1996



Mr. Tadahiko Ishino
Sharp Corporation
22-22 Nagaike-cho
Abeno-ku
Osaka, Japan

RE: LSI Products Supply Agreement dated October 1, 1993

Dear Mr. Ishino:

This letter will memorialize the understanding reached between Sharp Corporation
and Altera Corporation to change the terms of payment set forth in the
referenced Agreement between our companies.

Article 5, paragraph (b) of the Agreement provides for payment pursuant to a
letter of credit payable at sight. We have agreed that instead of these payment
terms, Sharp will invoice Altera for wafer purchase on shipment, with net 28 day
payment terms. This change will be effective for wafer starts beginning July 1,
1996. Altera will open an irrevocable standby LC in favor of Sharp at a mutually
acceptable bank, presently Banque Nationale de Paris, to back up Altera's
payment obligations. The amount of the standby LC will be as agreed upon by
Sharp and Altera from time to time, initially set at 1.5 billion yen. Sharp has
agreed to give Altera written notice of any invoices not paid within 28 days,
and to only draw on the LC if and to the extent that the invoice remains unpaid
after 15 days have passed since delivery of notice.

If this letter matches your understanding of our agreement, please so indicate
by signing and returning to us the enclosed copy. Thank you for your
cooperation.

Sincerely,


/s/ RODNEY SMITH
-----------------------------
Rodney Smith
Chairman of the Board,
President and CEO

Agreed and Accepted this 28th day of August, 1996:

Sharp Corporation


By:    /s/  TADAHIKO ISHINO
       ------------------------------

       Executive Director and Group General Manager of
Title: International Sales & Marketing Group-IC/Electronic Components
       ------------------------------
#### HARRY D. SCHEIDELL v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE MIRTHA E. DAVALOS, doing 

business as El Bosque Builders LLC, 

 Debtor. 

__________________________________ 

MIRTHA E. DAVALOS, 

 Appellant, 

 v. 

YVETTE GONZALES, Trustee, 

 Appellee. 

BAP No. NM-10-015 

Bankr. No. 09-13215 

Chapter 7 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

May 6, 2010 

————————————————— 

On April 20, 2010, this Court entered a Notice of Deficiency and Order to Show 

Cause (“Order”), requiring the Appellant to do the following by May 4, 2010, or the 

appeal would be dismissed: 

A party who files a designation of record with the bankruptcy court must file 

a copy with this court within fourteen (14) days after the date of the notice 

that the appeal has been docketed with this court. Previously 10th Cir. BAP 

L.R. 8006-1(b); filing requirements now governed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006 

per Revised 10th Cir. BAP L.R. effective May 1, 2010.

BAP Appeal No. 10-15 Docket No. 22-1 Filed: 05/06/2010 Page: 1 of 2
A party who files a statement of issues with the bankruptcy court must file a 

copy with this court within fourteen (14) days after the date of the notice that 

the appeal has been docketed with this court. Previously 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 

8006-1(b); filing requirements now governed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006 per 

the Revised 10th Cir. BAP L.R. effective May 1, 2010.

The deadline has expired without any response to the Order. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure 

to prosecute. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8018-4(c). The Appellant is 

advised that the revised 10th Circuit BAP Local Rules effective May 1, 2010, are 

available at the BAP’s website (www.bap10.uscourts.gov) or may be obtained by 

contacting the BAP Clerk’s Office. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-15 Docket No. 22-1 Filed: 05/06/2010 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Quarter ended      Quarter ended
                                                             December 31,       December 31,
                                                                1997               1996
                                                                ----               ----

<S>                                                         <C>               <C>        
Net income (loss)                                           $(1,338,219)      $    10,516
                                                            ===========       ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic            5,335,168         4,556,079
Assumed conversion of outstanding options and warrants                            867,393
Assumed repurchase of outstanding common shares                                 (540,780)
                                                            -----------       -----------

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted          5,335,168         4,882,692
                                                            ===========       ===========

Basic earnings (loss) per share                             $     (0.25)      $     (0.00)
                                                            ===========       ===========
</TABLE>


Diluted earnings per share are not shown because the results thereof are
anti-dilutive.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President
and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010                       
|                                              
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE VALDES
, Appellant,

v.

KIMBERLY VALDES
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 1797

[ May 25, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D . Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 13

- 1830 (44/90)

.

Jose Valdes, Coral Gables, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The Father appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by seeking out and inventing its own facts, and that the trial court miscalculated his timesharing. We agree t he trial court erred in its calculation of timesharing. The Final Judgment and Parenting Plan awarded the Father 41.87% timesharing. However, the Parenting

Plan reflects on ly 22% of actual timesharing for the Father. Accordingly,

we reverse and remand for recalculation. On remand, the trial court should also clarify when the Father’s weekend timesharing begins.

Reversed and remanded.

S TEVENSON

, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Seymour *v.*Watson.

A person mads a rail-fence by mistake on *United States'1*land, which land was afterwards sold by the *United States*to a third person. *Held,*that the fence passed with the soil to the purchaser.

*556Saturday, *May*29.

ERROR to the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court.

*A. S. White*and *R. A. Lockwood,*for the plaintiff.

*J. Pettit,*for the defendant.

Dewey, J.

Trespass *quare clausum fregit.*Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment below for the plaintiff. 1

It appeared in evidence, that the plaintiff and defendant were the proprietors of adjoining fields; that the defendant purchased his land of the *United'States,*and before his lines had been run, and while the plaintiff’s land was vacant, enclosed his field with a rail-fence made with his own rails, and that in doing so, he placed a part of the fence on the land of the *United States,*which the plaintiff afterwards purchased; and that the defendant moved the fence from the land of the plaintiff to his own land. This is the trespass complained of. The Court instructed the jury that, under the circumstances above stated, the rails removed by the defendant were the property of the plaintiff, although the former had placed the fence on the land of the latter by mistake. Whether this instruction be correct or not, is the only question presented by the record.

We think the law was correctly given to the jury. It is a general principle, that all permanent buildings follow the tenure of the soil on which they are erected. The fence which encloses a field is within this doctrine. It is necessary for the use and occupation of the ground, and cannot be removed without injury to the freehold; on alienation, it passes with the soil. 2 Kent’s Comm. 342.—3 Bac. Abr. 63.—*Hutchinson*v. *Mains,*1 *Alcock*and *Napier,*155, cited in 2 Harr. Dig. 1163. That the defendant placed the fence in question on the land of another by mistake, does not alter the matter; it was no less a part of the freehold for that reason. Being the property of the *United States*in consequence of its annexation to the soil, it passed to the plaintiff by virtue of his purchase of the land on which it stood.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
#### James McKnoll *v.*Jas. W. Wear’s Admr.

Personal Representative — Action Against — 'Account — Demand — Affidavit — Proof by Personal Representative Only — Successor — Voucher — Settlement.

It is the duty of a claimant, before commencing an action against a personal representative, to demand payment and accompany it with proof of the account as well as his own affidavit.

Same —■ V oucher.

The personal representative must be furnished with a proper voucher by which he can obtain credit in his settlement.

Same Proof by Personal Representative.

If proof of a claim can only be made by the personal representative and he refuses to make the affidavit, further proof is dispensed with.

Representative — Admission — Successor.

The mere admission of the correctness of a demand by a representative does not bind his successor in office so as to dispense with proof.

APPEAL EROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 27, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin:

It is the duty of a claimant, before commencing an action against a personal representative on an account against the estate of a decedent, to demand its payment and accompany the demand with proof of the account, as well as with his own affidavit, one *448of the objects of the law being to furnish the personal representative with a proper voucher by which he can obtain credit in his settlement, by the payment when made. If proof of the claim can only be made by the personal representative, and he being required shall refuse to make the requisite affidavit, such refusal would dispense with the proof as a prerequisite to the commencement of the action (1 Met. 600). But it does not appear that the administratrix of Wear refused or was required to give an affidavit proving the justness of the claim, and we are clearly of the opinion that her mere admission of the correctness of the demand and willingness to pay it did not bind her successor in office to do so and accept an insufficient voucher by which he could not properly have been credited in his settlement.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the court properly dismissed the action.

And the judgment is affirmed.
### Appeal No. 2023AP890

- CR Cir. Ct. No. 2022CT150



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

S TATE OF 

### W ISCONSIN



### ,

P LAINTIFF



### - A PPELLANT



### ,

V



### .

L AUREN 

### D ANNIELLE 

### P ETERSON



### ,

D EFENDANT



### - R ESPONDENT



### . 

### FILED

Jan. 11, 2024

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum

, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice Hon. Patricia A. Barrett

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Carrie Wastlick

Clerk of Circuit Court

Sauk County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Natalia J Gess

Electronic Notice

Jeremiah W. Meyer

- O’ Day

Electronic Notice



### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to footnote 2

and paragraph 12 in the above

- captioned opinion which was released onNo. 2023AP890

- CR

2 

### December 29, 2023 . A corrected electronic version in its entirety is available on the

court's website at www.wicou rts.gov.No. 2023AP890

- CR

3
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 2, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

GEORGE DAVID GORDON, 

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-5026

(D.C. No. 4:09-CR-00013-JHP-1)

ORDER

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely is GRANTED. 

The order being appealed was entered on February 8, 2010, and the notice of

appeal was filed more than 14 days later on March 5. 

In a criminal appeal, the defendant’s notice of appeal is to be filed within

14 days of entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). This rule is an

“inflexible claim-processing rule[], which unlike a jurisdictional rule, may be

forfeited if not properly raised by the government.” United States v. Garduno,

506 F.3d 1287, 1291 (10th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation omitted). 

We determine that the government properly raised the issue in its motion to

Appellate Case: 10-5026 Document: 01018396013 Date Filed: 04/02/2010 Page: 1 
2

dismiss. “Because the government timely objected to [the defendant’s] late notice

of appeal, this court is bound to dismiss the appeal.” Id. at 1292.

APPEAL DISMISSED. The defendant’s motion to stay the trial is

DENIED.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-5026 Document: 01018396013 Date Filed: 04/02/2010 Page: 2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

                              NEWTEK CAPITAL, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Wilshire Advisors, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire New York Advisers II, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire New York Partners III, LLC, a New York limited liability company
The Whitestone Group, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire Investors, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company
Wilshire Louisiana Advisers, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company
Wilshire Louisiana Partners, II, a Louisiana limited liability company
Wilshire Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Newtek Securities, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Newtek Capital, Inc., a New York corporation
BJB Holdings, Inc. , a New York corporation
Wilshire Holdings I, a New York corporation
Wilshire Holdings II, a New York corporation
REXX Environmental Corporation, a New York corporation
Whitestone Capital Markets, Inc., a New York corporation
Wilshire Colorado Partners, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
Wilshire Texas Partners, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (in active)

[Partner Company Subsidiaries:]
CB Real Net, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company
Harvest Strategies, LLC, a New York limited liability company
PPMlink, LLC, and New York limited liability company
Universal Processing Services, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Universal Processing Services -- Louisiana, LLC, a New York limited liability
  company
Universal Processing Services - Wisconsin, LLC, a New York limited liability
  company
#### RICHARD V. HANDABAKA v. CITY OF PATERSON.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13 - 24 - 00134 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.P.J., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022 - FAM - 61501 - 5

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No cost s are asses se d , due to appel lant ’ s inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for o bservance. July 5, 2024
# Space Launch System rocket at INFINITY Science Center

A young visitor views a model of NASA’s new Space Launch System rocket, being built to send astronauts on deep space missions to the Moon and Mars, at INFINITY Science Center.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/s22-039_stennis_photo_-_sls_exhibit/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASA / StennisSize2100x3159pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									LaToya Dean								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman