alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 19, 2015

p0616 

# Order

Clerk June 19, 2015

149907 & (36)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149907

COA: 315193

Jackson CC: 10

- 006275

- FH

ERIC D. MOORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

By order of April 3, 2015, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)( 1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal,

we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred

in stating that insanity is not a defense to general intent crimes. The insanity defense

statute, MCL 768.21a, does not limit appl ication of the defense to specific intent crimes.

Rather, the statute makes clear that insanity is a defense to all crimes, including general

intent and strict liability offenses. Id . In stating otherwise, the Court of Appeals

misinterpreted our decision in People v Carpenter , 464 Mich 223 (2001). Relief is not

warranted, however, because our review of the record indicates that the evidence which

defendant claims was wrongly excluded would not have assisted defendant in proving the

defense of insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. See MCL 768.21a(3). In all

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Crabs *v.*Fetick.—In error.

*Thursday, May*29.

IN trespass *quare clausum fregit,*a licence cannot be given in evidence under the general issue. It should be specially pleaded.- *Bennett*v. *Allcott,*2 T. R. 166.
SARAH LOUCKS 804 Pecan Street

DISTRICT CLERK PO Box 770

PHONE (512) 332

- 7244 Bastrop, TX 78602

FAX (512) 332

- 7249

Bastrop County District Clerk

August 20, 2015

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12547

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

- 2547

Re: Court of Appeals No. 03

- 15

- 00391

- CV; Trial Court No. 15

- 17165

Style: VRM v. Edw ard Heard, et al.

Dear Sir or Madam :

I have spoken with the Appellant ’ s attorney for the above styled cause of action. He has

expressed to me that he has lost contact with his client for the time being, therefore would be

unable to pay our fee for the Clerk ’ s Record.

I would like to request a 30 day extension for filing my record. This would give the

Appellant time to contact us with payment.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please do not

hesitate to contact me.

Best,

/s/ K aty Nyc

Katy Nyc

Deputy Clerk

Bastrop County District Clerk ’s Office

804 Pecan Street /Po Box 770

Bastrop, TX 78602

(512) 581

- 4027

Katy.nyc@co.bastrop.tx.us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,000
<PP&E>                                         450,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,311,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,505
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,000,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,376
<SALES>                                        435,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               435,739
<CGS>                                          637,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,724,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,004,897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   224,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,780,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,780,897)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LINWOOD JEFFERSON.

May *2,*1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Jones, Appellant, *v.*Jones, Appellee.

(No. 6553

Decided October 22, 1945.)

*Mr. Wm. B. Petermann,*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Hildebrant, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas refusing to grant an uncontested divorce.

The petition merely.sets forth that defendant had been guilty of extreme cruelty and gross neglect of duty toward the plaintiff.

Plaintiff testified as to the jurisdictional facts and merely that defendant left the house, that plaintiff had *552been and still was providing, and that he knew of no reason for defendant so leaving. Two witnesses corroborated the evidence of plaintiff by testifying that he provided a proper home and support, that defendant left the home, and that the witnesses knew of no reason for defendant’s leaving.

The trial court found that the evidence disclosed merely a wilful absence of one year and three months without any aggravating circumstances constituting gross neglect of duty or extreme cruelty, and that, therefore, plaintiff failed to sustain the allegations of the petition.

In order to reverse a judgment, it should be plain to the reviewing court that the conclusions of the trial court cannot be supported by any rational view of the evidence. On the contrary, in the instant case, it is plain to this reviewing court that the trial court did take a rational view of the evidence disclosed by the record.

On authority of *Porter, Exr.,*v. *Lerch,*129 Ohio St., 47, 193 N. E., 766, with attention directed to the body of the opinion at page 64, the "judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Hildebrant, P. J., Matthews and Ross, JJ., concur in the syllabus, opinion and judgment.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2078

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device panel assemblies 

for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type televisions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device 

panel assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type televisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICE PANEL ASSEMBLIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.85.24 Liquid Crystal Device panel assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device 

projection type televisions (provided 

for in subheading 9013.80.90) .......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•S 2078 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| Date: August              3, 2007  |                                                                                  |               |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                         |                                                                                  |
|                                    |                                                                             |          |
|                                         |                                                                                       | /s/ Craig L. Levra |
|                                         | Chairman              of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President             |
|                                         |                                                                                  |
|                                         |                                                                                       |
|                                         | /s/ Howard K. Kaminsky                                                           |
|                                         | Executive Vice President-Finance,Chief Financial Officer and                Secretary |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005
of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and belief
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|Dated:  August 12, 2005 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman,
     President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1731 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1731

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 15, 2003

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO CORRIDOR, TEXAS.

    Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(45) In the State of Texas, the La Entrada al Pacifico 
        Corridor consisting of any portion of a highway in a corridor 
        on 2 miles of either side of the center line of the highway 
        and--
                    ``(A) State Route 349 from Lamesa to the point on 
                that highway that is closest to 32 degrees, 7 minutes, 
                north latitude, by 102 degrees, 6 minutes, west 
                longitude;
                    ``(B) the segment or any roadway extending from the 
                point described by subparagraph (A) to the point on 
                Farm-to-Market Road 1788 closest to 32 degrees, 0 
                minutes, north latitude, by 102 degrees, 16 minutes, 
                west longitude;
                    ``(C) Farm-to-Market Road 1788 from the point 
                described by subparagraph (B) to its intersection with 
                Interstate Route 20;
                    ``(D) Interstate Route 20 from its intersection 
                with Farm-to-Market Road 1788 to its intersection with 
                United States Route 385;
                    ``(E) United States Route 385 from Odessa to Fort 
                Stockton, including those portions that parallel United 
                States Route 67 and Interstate Route 10; and
                    ``(F) United States Route 67 from Fort Stockton to 
                Presidio, including those portions that parallel 
                Interstate Route 10 and United States Route 90.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reportdated March 15, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand schedule in the Annual Report of Stonepath Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by referenceof said reportin the Registration Statements of Stonepath Group, Inc. on Form S-3(File No. 333-112609,333-110231, 333-108605,333-104228, 333-91240,and 333-64452, and the Registration Statements on Forms S-8(File No. 333-113052, 333-109249, 333-103439 and 333-74918)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPSeattle, Washington
Mark E. Smith

direct dial: 713.646.1385

mesmith@bakerlaw.com

November 12, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Jeffrey D. Kyle

Clerk of the Court

Third Court of Appeals

PO Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Audi of America, Inc. v. 

John Walker III, et al; No. 03-15-00285-CV; in the Third Court of 

Appeals.

Dear Mr. Kyle,

Please be advised that the hearing before the Texas Department of Motor 

Vehicles Board has been removed from the Board’s November 13, 2015 

agenda. For this reason, Appellants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

and Audi of America, Inc. hereby withdraw their Second Verified Motion 

for Temporary Relief to Protect the Court’s Jurisdiction and Brief in 

Support Thereof, as temporary relief in this appeal is not necessary at this 

time.

Regards,

/s/ Mark E. Smith

Mark E. Smith

Counsel for Appellants

ACCEPTED

03-15-00285-CV

7808420

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/12/2015 4:58:24 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/12/2015 4:58:24 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Clerk of the Court

Third Court of Appeals

November 12, 2015

Page 2

cc: Billy M. Donley Via Email – bdonley@bakerlaw.com

S. Shawn Stephens Via Email – sstephens@kslaw.com

James P. Sullivan Via Email – jsullivan@kslaw.com

William R. Crocker Via Email – crockerlaw@earthlink.net

Via Email – tcasteel@earthlink.net

J. Bruce Bennett Via Email – jbb.chblaw@sbcglobal.net

Via Email – cardwellhartbennett@gmail.com

Joseph Letzer Via Email – jletzer@burr.com

Dent M. Morton Via Email – dmorton@burr.com

Whitney Hamm Via Email – whamm@burr.com

Elizabeth B. Shirley Via Email – bshirley@burr.com

Ellen Mathews Via Email – emathews@burr.com

Kimberly Fuchs

Via Email – kimberly.fuchs@texasattorneygeneral.gov

Dennis McKinney

Via Email – dennis.mckinney@texasattorneygeneral.gov

Lloyd E. “Buddy” Ferguson

Via Email – buddy.ferguson@strasburger.com

Via Email – kathi.alexander@strasburger.com
----

----

| Name of Subsidiary          | Country of Incorporation             |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Radware Inc.                | New Jersey, United States of America |
| Radware UK Limited          | United Kingdom                       |
| Radware France              | France                               |
| Radware Srl                 | Italy                                |
| Radware GmbH                | Germany                              |
| Nihon Radware KK            | Japan                                |
| Radware Australia Pty. Ltd. | Australia                            |
| Radware Singapore Pte. Ltd. | Singapore                            |
| Radware Korea Ltd.          | Korea                                |
| Radware Canada Inc.         | Canada                               |
| Radware India Pvt. Ltd.     | India                                |
| Covelight Systems, Inc.     | Delaware, United States of America   |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67968-67969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS10-9]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the

[[Page 67969]]

Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: FDIC Building, 1776 F Street, NW., Room 4085, Washington, 
DC 20429.
    Date: November 10, 2010.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session beginning at 10:30 
a.m.
    Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    October 13, 2010 minutes--Closed Session.
    Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: October 29, 2010.
Deborah S. Merkle,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010-27909 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
February 2, 2000
Stewart Garner, President
Playandwin, Inc.
155 University Avenue
Suite 501
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5H3B7
                                   Fax: 416-368-3870
Dear Mr. Garner:
This  letter  will  confirm your agreement to  retain  our  firm,
Private Capital Group, Inc. ("PCG"), on a non-exclusive and "best
efforts  basis",  as  a  consultant to  introduce  your  company,
Playandwin,  Inc.  ("WIN"), may complete a  capital  transaction,
("Transaction"). A Transaction may include a merger of your  firm
of  your  firm with another company or an acquisition,  in  which
your firm is either acquired or is the acquirer, or a funding  in
which  WIN  obtains equity of debt capital. For this introduction
for  our  facilitation of a satisfactory Transaction, PCG  is  to
receive  a cash finder's fee equal to Seven Percent (7%)  of  all
monies received by you as consideration for these efforts. Such a
fee  arrangement would apply to the total Transaction due  for  a
merger,  acquisition  or  an  equity  investment.  Any  follow-up
investment  made  by an investor identified by PCG,  directly  or
indirectly, within twenty-four months from initial funding  shall
be subject to a three percent (3%) finder's fee.
WIN  will  also issue warrants to PCG, or its designee, equal  to
five Percent (5%) of the total amount of transaction value or  of
funds  raised.  Such  warrants will have  an  exercise  price  of
Transaction terms which shall have not less than a life  of  five
(5)  years from the date of issuance. The warrants will have  the
same registration rights as the warrants issued to an underwriter
in  an  IPO. This fee is in consideration for these efforts.  Any
follow-up   investment  made  by  an  investor   or   institution
identified  by  PCG,  directly or indirectly, within  twenty-four
months from initial funding shall be subject to the same fees.
All  finders' fees shall be due and payable in full by WIN  after
closing  and funding of any Transaction. Fees will be payable  to
our  firm or assigns. If any fees that are due and payable to PCG
are  not  paid at the Transaction closing and funding,  then  WIN
will  pay all PCG's costs of collection and related our-of-pocket
expenses. We understand that WIN shall be under no obligation  to
accept  a merger acquisition, financing or investment from anyone
unless such terms are satisfactory to WIN.
WIN  specifically  authorizes PCG  to  deliver  a  copy  of  this
agreement  to  lender investor and authorizes lender/investor  to
deduct  fee  due  PCG  directly from the first  proceeds  of  the
funding and pay said sum directly to PCG.
If this agreement meets with your approval, please acknowledge by
signing  below  and  delivering a copy to  me,  so  that  we  may
immediately  begin  our efforts. I want to  thank  you  for  this
opportunity to work with you. I will look forward to a successful
relationship.
Sincerely,


/s/ Donald G. Huggins, Jr.
Donald G. Huggins, Jr. President
Accepted and agreed to this 2 day of February, 2000
/s/ Stewart Garner
Stewart Garner, President
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2022 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2022

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in 
    Carbondale, Illinois the ``Senator Paul Simon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 250 West Cherry Street in 
Carbondale, Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Senator 
Paul Simon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCE.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator Paul Simon 
Federal Building.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```