1. Task Order performance

Task order technical performance shall be weighted at 55 percent of the total award fee
available. Prior to the start of the Award Fee evaluation period the Technical Representative for
each task order will assign a weight for each quality or schedule standard to be met. T' he total of
weights must equal 100 percent.

At the point where the Contacting Officer notifies the C ‘ontractor of the final Award Fee Evaluation Board
meeting, the COTR will send to each TR a copy of the evaluation criteria and request an adjective and numeric

rating for each weighted factor as follows:

Excellent (91 — 100) Performance is of exceptional merit. The standard has been
significantly exceeded resulting in a tangible benefit to the

Government,

Very Good (81-90) Very effective performance. The standard has been marginally
exceeded.

Good (71 - 80) Effective performance. The standard has been achieved. Minor

deficiencies have little or no impact on performance.

Fair (61 —70) The standard has not quite been achieved. Minor deficiencies
have identifiable impact on Performance

Poor (0 ~ 60) Standard is not achieved. Deficiencies adversely affect
performance. Remedial action required,

Tasks that do not receive a rating by the NASA TR within the time specified by the COTR will be assigned a

Score equivalent to the average weighted value of all tasks that have been rated as of that date.
2. Cost Control

Cost Control shall be weighted at 25 percent of the total award fee available. The weights and
evaluation criteria to be used in determining the Cost Control score are contained in
Attachment I,

3. Business Management

Business Management shall be weighted at 20 percent of the total award fee available. The
Contracting Officer will indicate the specific weights and evaluation criteria to be used in
determining the Business Management score. These weights will be approved by the Fee
Determination Official prior to the beginning of each award fee period. The current weights to
be used are indicated in Attachment II.



TTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERMINATION NO. 1994-2416, RE

tor Opera
Gardener

ndow Cleaner
ith Occupations
Dental As.

1-
2 -
3
00 ~ Medical
30 - Medical
60 - Medical
90 - Medical
221 ~ Nursing
22 — Nursing
23 - Nursing Assistant
224 ~ Nursing Assistant
50 - Pharmacy Technician
80 - ebotomist
il - Registered Nurse I

~ Registered Nurse I
Registered Nurse I

i Nurse If
Nurse I

Nurse

DOB Wt E

ca
wn
ag

16.56

ts Specialist ol
bits Specialist -80
bits -82

@

1304

130

130

1307

1307

13073 - Photographer

3074 - Photographer

3075 - Photographer
15000 - Laundry, Dry Cl

sembler

nter Attendant

ig
8.18
18
g



op

a

Q
3

9
a th or

Hy

he contractor or °
adequate number of uniforms without cost or to re
cost of the uni £.
the responsibility

ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DET

rmative

maintena

ny spec
der

a5

cr

forms

subcontractor

€

ial
to meet

intende:
Copies
ting

TION OF ADDITI

In addition,

MINA TION NO, 1994-2416, REV. 23, 5/23/06

emplo 2 1
mburse employees for the actual

and mainte:

is made
to

ONAL CLASS



ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERMINATIO! 0. 1994-16, REV. 23, 5/23/06

Woodcraft Worker
23980 - Woodworker

|
|
t
i

Plant and System Operat
| Pender

y and Bracer
Tender
28030 - Line Handler
28040 - Stevedore I
28050 - Stevedore rr

29062 - Dp
29063 - 5
29064 - Dp
29081 - & i

2

aN
OND

e

VOU Sao SS



ne-Toel Cperat.
19040 - Tool and Die Maker
21000 Material Handling and Packi

(She
and Parts

dity Control

fe
£¢ Servicer
fe

pector

Cable Splicer
Carpenter, Maintenance
Carpet Layer
Electrician, Maintenance
ctronics Technician,
Electronics Techniciar
Electronics Technician,
Fabric Worker

re Alarm System Mechanic
vr Repairer
m System Mechan.
1ce Worker
- Heating, Refrigeration
ipment Mechanic

os
os

23440 - vy Equipment Ope
23460 ~ Instrument Mechanic
23470 - Laborer
23500 - £ smith
530 - inery Ma nance ¥
550 - nist, Maintenance
23580 - enance Trades
23640 - lwright
23750 — Office Appliance Repair
23740 - Painter, Aircraft
23760 - Maintenance
23790 - ex, Maintenance
23800 -
23820 -
23850 ~
33870 -

Con

co

he te
uh

ao

RR

ao

sa Le oy
Gaw

ry

Sm Ww Late bo
Wow ur

OO RD

o
DE

a>
©



ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERMINATION NO. 1994-416, REV. 23, 5/23/06

2 with a plan commun.

cated to

(See 29 CFR

ONS .WHICH HAVE. PAR!

Y DIFFERENTI An 8 percent di applicable
position that represents a hazard

in close

ty to ordinance, explosives, and
includes work such as screening, blending, dying,
erdance, explosives, and pyrotechnic compositions
and photoflash powder, All ary~house
explosives. Demil

such as lead

living propellants
novation, demeii
i

tarization, modi
operations on sensitive ordnance, «
ati nvolving regra¢

and main

ble to employees employed
hen working with, or i
cent tc} explosives and
ceration of hands,

ome)

DP pe
ty

ym o

°
icine
Oba
OG.
5
Lg

3
3
a
Qe a
oma

ct

Db

operati

incendi

is

ES SSS aaa ae


7. CLEARANGe AND SAFEGUARDING
CURARTMENT OF DEFENSE la FACILITY CLEARANCE REQUIRED

CONTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION ‘TOP SEGRET

(The requirements of the DoD industrial Security Manual apply a
to aif security aspects of this effort) (. LEVEL OF SAFEGUARDING REQUIRED
(SECRE

— — Seer - .
2. THIS SPECIFICATION IS FOR: (X and complete a: plicable) | 3. THIS SPECIFICATION IS: (X and

| |. PRIME CONTRACT NUMBER ] x T —

| xX!

; (DATE (YYYY
x Innicossaors 2. ORIGINAL (Complete date in all casos} ‘zo0sosot
(DATE (VYYYMIMDD)
i

'b, SUBCONTRACT NUMBER ° | i b REVISED ~
i i rsedes all
| Seoeecesay |

ie. SOLICITATION OR OTHER NUMBER DUE DATE / YYYYMMDD)| | ¢. FINAL (Complete item 5 in all cases)
i i

"DATE (YYVVEIMBD)

1. a
TNO. if Yes, complete the following:
edi

4. 1S THIS A FOLLOW-ON CONTRACT? Lx i YES”

Pre

Classified material received or generated under NAS 3 - 00148 Contract Number} is transferred to this foliow-on cont

Se To —
5. 1S THIS A FINAL DD FORM 2547 x NO. if Yes, complete

In response te the contractor's request dated _ . fetention of the classified material is authorized for the period of
§. CONTRACTOR (Include Commercial and Govemmont Eniiy (CA GE) Code)
ja. NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE ~~ ib. CAGE CODE |e. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE” (Name, Address and Zip Code} |
JASRC Aerospace Corporation i1czzo (Defense Security Service
6303 ivy Lane, Suite 130 (1340 Braddock Place
Greenbelt, MD 20770 { Sth Floor

Alexandria, VA 22314

|
|

{7. SUBCONTRACTOR
a. NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZiP CODE

AGE CODE /c. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE (Name, Address, and Zip Cade)

e
°

8. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE _

ja. LOCATION — Te. CAGE CODE lc. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE Wamo, Addhoss ond Zip Code)

NASA Glenn Research Center IN/A INA
21000 Brookpark Road, MS 501-1 | |
Cleveland, OH 44135

i
|
i

9. GENERAL IDENTIFICATION OF THIS PROCUREMENT
Glenn Engineering & Scientific Services - 2 (GESS - 2)

10. CONTRACTOR WILL REQUIRE ACGESS TO: [ves| no ii. IN PERFORMING THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL:

a, COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COSMEC) INFORMATION x toi CONTRAST Seee, TACIT OR A Ee noe
b. RESTRICTED DATA |__| X | © RECEIVE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS ONLY
|_X | &. RECEIVE AND GENERATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL

X |: FABRICATE, MODIFY. OR STORE CLASSIFIED HARDWARE

& CRITICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON DESIGN INFORMATION
¢. FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA |
©. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

- |

Se THAN Age iF i IRMATION OUTSIDE THE TS. i

Sensitive Compartmented information (SCI |" PUERTO Rico, Us poSseaSIONS ANAT TERRITORIES [xX]

‘Nowscl | © BE AUTHORIZED 1 USE THE SERVICES OF DEFENSE: TECHNICAL INT URMATION Te
1X |” CENTER (otic) OF OTHER eeCONDABe DISTRIBUTION CENTER ix |

-QUIRE & COMSEC ACCOUNT

DD FORM 254, DEC 1999 ITION IS OBSOLE



Award Fee Evaluation Plan
and
Award Fee Evaluation Board Responsibilities

For Contract NNCO6BA07B

Contractor: ASRC Aerospace Corporation

Original Plan Date: August 21, 2006

Revision Number: 0

Revision Date:

Approved:

Daniel J. Gauntner
NASA Fee Determination Official

SRRRRRRARRRRRIRRERRNIERE


ATTACHMENT BD - DOL WAGE DETERMINATION NO. 1994-2416, REV. 23, 5/23/06

computes a proposed

oy
Qa

OS

fon
wy

50

section

a

Wage and Hour
transmittal to th
fficer that addiri

Rememb
ass is
be used

cl

mbine, or subd



ATION NO, 1994-2416, REV. 23, 5/23/06

ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERM

a

Unexploded
nexploded

INN NN te to
SeSC608bES

ADD

°
OwaAw
oo4

RADA
BUS

70
pment Operator eli
Equipment Repairer 10.57
Worker 8.3
esk Clerk io.i
~ 20.

°

- Mortician
Park Attendant (Aide)

g Worker (Photo Lab
Recreation Specialist
- Recycling Worker

les Clerk

hool Crossing Guard
- Sport Official
rvey Pa
~ Surveying Techr
- Surveying Ai
Swimming Pool

w
See oun eS os

room Tech)

@ Repairer
ng Machine Repa E

LTH & WELFAI Life, accident
» Civic and personal leave, se
mployer contributions costi



3

ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERMINATION NO, 1994-2416, REV.

o

0 Operator

04 Operator

o4 mputer Operator
0304 Operator
0304 Operator V
0307 Programmer I
03072 - Programmer
03073 ~ )
03074 ~
93101 - Computer Systems Analyst I (1)
03102 - Computer Systems Analyst It {1}
03103 - Computer Systems Analyst III (1)
03160 fo}

05060

~ Automotive Worker
- Electrician, Automoti

~ Motor
~ Motor
05250 - Moror vehicle Upholstery 4
$280 - Motor Vehicle Wrecker

05310 Automotive

05349 Repair Speciali

05370

05460 Spec
07000 - Service ¢

fnot set) - Worker

07010
O7041

3, 5/23/06

fo be pe be ay

© 0 0 1D
TOOQW

2 ds

pears

G

AO



4. Cultural Diversity
Description of Factor:

In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 11246, as administered by the Department of Labor’s
(DOL) Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), performance will be measured based on
goals outlined in the contractor’s Affirmative Action Program (AAP) Plan, as well as with their compliance in
support of other EO processes.

Basis or Standard for Measuring Performance:
The adjective ratings to be used: Highly Successful, Successful. and Unsuccessful as determined by the Equal
Opportunity Compliance Program Manager. This rating may result in an adjustment of 0 to 3 percent of the
Award Fee score based on the magnitude of the positive or negative ratings evaluated.

5. Maintaining a Qualified Workforce
The contractor will be evaluated on their ability to attract and maintain a qualified workforce. This factor shall
be used to evaluate the contractor's salary and benefits packages, use of wage surveys, evaluation of skill

shortage categories, and employee turnover rates. This rating may result in an adjustment of 0 to 3 percent of the
Award Fee score based on the magnitude of the positive or negative ratings evaluated.

D. Award Fee Determination

1. The COTR will schedule the Award Fee Evaluation Board Meeting. The Award Fee Evaluation Board
typically convenes 30 days after the end of the award fee period.

ne

Members of the Award Fee Board will be as follows:
Fee Determination Official:
Daniel J. Gauntner Chief. Engineering Systems Division

Award Fee Board Members (Voting)

Dawn C. Emerson Engineering Systems Division
Damodar R. Ambur Research and Technology Directorate
John D. Taylor Programs and Projects Directorate
Bradley J. Baker Chief, Procurement Division

Award Fee Board Members (Non-V: oting)

Timothy C. Pierce Contracting Officer, Procurement Division
Thomas P. Burke (COTR), Engineering Systems Division
Virginia F. Cestaro (ACOTR), Engineering Systems Division
Deborah A. Cotleur Equal Opportunity (EO) Specialist

3. Contractor Self Assessment

The Contractor shall be invited to present a self-assessment of their performance to the Award F:
Evaluation Board. This assessment will be conducted at the beginning of the Award Fe ing
assessment should be limited to no more than 30 minutes. At the conclusion of the self-assessment the

aes



(c)

(d)

{e)

(g)

Solicit input for the TU Office and Industrial Property Office.

At the close of each evaluation period, consolidate and summarize the Contractor Performance
Reports submitted by TRs, CO/COTR, and EEO monitor.

Prepare an oral presentation of findings to the Award Fee Evaluation Board summarizing the
Technical Representatives’ findings for the period.

Prepare a "Notice of Award Fee" for transmittal to the Contractor after a fee determination is made.
Maintain the Award Fee evaluation file consisting of the following:

(1) Approved scoring system

(2) TR and BEO Monitor Contractor performance Reports
(3) Presentation materials for Award Fee Evaluation Board
(4) Fee Determination

(5) Correspondence

Technical Representative (TR)

(a)

(b)

Maintain a close liaison with the Contractor on assigned technical tasks and apprise the COTR
of Contractor performance which may indicate potential problems.

Submit award fee performance evaluation reports for award fee determination when
requested by the COTR.

Equal Employment Opportunity Monitor

Provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Contractor's compliance, or non-compliance, with its
multicultural diversity plan. Make a presentation of findings to the AFEB at the time of the
semiannual fee determination.

Contracting Officer

With the COTR and ACOTR prepare a Performance Evaluation Report of contract level performance for
use in the award fee determination, and prepare and make a presentation to the AFEB of the cost control

findings and solicit input from FMD.



i ATTACHMENT D - DOL WAGE DETERMINATION NO, 1994-2416, REV. 23, 5/23/06
i (23) AREA: OH, CLEVELAND

CONTRAC

OCCUBATION CODE - TITLE MINIMUM & RAT
01000 - ve Support and Clerical Occupations i
01011 Clerk I 21.25 |
e112 Clerk II 13.02 i
01013 Clerk III 14.45 j
01014 - Accounting Clerk 16.26 i
01630 - Court Reporter 16.98
010560 - Motor Vehicle 14.49
01060 - Preparation Clerk 13.53
1070 ~ (Courier) 49
090 - Duplicating Machine op .90

~ Film/Tape brarian
Clerk TI
Clerk

~ General Clerk

18 - General Clerk

20 - Housing Referral Assistant

1- Entry Operator I 11.54
01132 - Key Entry Operator rt 12.96
a 1 ode 2.85
a 2 5.0 zg
9 12.9

.&

© OM A & ot

SORUN EL



12, PUBLIC RELEASE. Any information (classified or unclassified} pertaining to this cantract
by the Industrial. Security Manuat or unless it has Seen approved for public release by apprep!
submitted for approval prior to release | ovest EX] rmaugn pecs

The Gienn Security Classification Officer, Glenn Program Security Officer and to

Administration, GRC, and to the Office of Public Affairs, NASA, Washington DC 20546.

{0 the Directorate for Freedom of information ang Security Review, Otfice of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs)* tor review.
ure shall be submitted to that agency.

shall Aoi be released tor public dissemination except as provided
viate U.S. Government authority. Proposed public releases shall be

the Office of Public Affairs, National Aeronautics and Space

“In the case of non-DoD User Agencies, requests for di

{his guidance or if any ather contributing factor indicates a need for changes In ts eovloncs,

handled and protected at the highest level of classification assigned or recommarnicd (Fill in

NASA Security of information Technology, NPR 2810.1 as currently revised.
GLPR 1620.1, Glenn Security Procedures and Requirements.

COMSEC SOP.

‘equested by other NASA installations, other Goverment Agencies, and private

document does not authorize’ any classified information pertinent to this contract

Security Specialist.

also be forwarded to:

NASA Glenn Research Center
21000 Brookpark Rd. MS 105-2
Cleveland, Oh 44135

Fax: (216) 433-6664

ATTN: Gerti Wiese

13. SECURITY GUIDANCE. the Scourty classification guidance needed for this classified effor ie identified below. any difficulty is encountered in applying
fa

pepmmimended changes; to challenge the guidance or the classification assigned to any informetion oy material furnished or generated under the contract:
find to submit any questions for interpretation ofthis guidance to the etfical WentiNed heres Pending final decision, the information involved shall be

separate correspondence, any documents/guidesextracts referenced herein, Add addioner pages as needed te arovide complete guidance }
This document serves as written notification authorizating of classified work at Glenn Research Center and Plumbrook.

Contractor must follow the security requirements as outlined by the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manuai (NISPOM).
NPR 1600.1, NASA Security Procedures and Guidelines as currently revised in November 2008, (SBU is covered within this document).

NASA Special Access Program Security Classification Guide {SAP/SCS), as currently revised.

The NASA COTR will specify tasks or positions requiring security clearances. These tasks May include research activities integrated with
state-of-the-art information technology, analytical and experimental investigations of specific aircraft, robocraft, missiles and Space vehicles

All Classified material will be processed and stored at NASA GRC with Christi Tomaro. Any contractor requiring the use of COMSEC material
must be COMSEC briefed and fallow the Fequirements set forth by the GRC COMSEC SOP. This contract is a perform services only and this

and/or stored at any focation other than Glenn Research Center and Pumbrook Station, without the approval of the COTR and the industrial

NOTE: An annual visit request must be mailed or faxed to the Security Management and Safeguards Office. Ali changes to this request must

the contractor is authorized and encouraged to provide

a8 appropriate for the classified effort. Attach, or forward under

industry.

to be accessed, received, generated, fabricated, modified,

14. ADDITIONAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. Requirements, in addition to ISM requirements, are aolablohed lor this contract, | X JES [|
Gf Yes, identify the periinent contractual clauses in the contract document itself, or provide an 2pproptiate statement which identifies the additional ~~ ~
requirements, Provide a copy of the requirements to the cognizant security office, Use item 13 if additional Space is needed.)

Additional security requirements are identified in the NASA Special Access Program Secutity Guide (SAPSG) as currently revised.

All elements pertaining to 10f, will be under the security cognizance of: NASA Glei
Rd., MS 100-5, Cleveland, OH 44135 ATTN: Christi Tomaro

15. INSPECTIONS. Elements of this contract are outside the inspection responsibility of the cognizant security office.
(i Yes, explain and identity speciic areas or elements carved out and the activity responsible for inspections, Use Item #3 if adaitionat space

nn Research Center, Program Security Officer 21000 Brookpark|

16. CERTIFICATION AND SIGNATURE. Security requirements stated herein are complete and adequate for safeguarding the classified
information to be released or generated under this classified effort. All questions shall be referred to the official named below.

@. TYPED NAME OF CERTIFYING OFFICIAL
Paul K. Wells

fb. TITLE

|industriai Security Specialist, SMSO

je. TELEPHONE (include Area Code}

(216-433-3183
216-433-6550 (Fax)

| & ADDRESS (include Zp Code)
NASA Gienn Research Center f
24000 Brookpark AS 2-2 :
Cleveland, :

“7. REQUIRED Di
i] INTRACTOR
>. SUBCONTRACTOR

IBUTION

GNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE F: NTRACTOR

ITY ADMINISTRATION

DD FORM 254, DEC 1999



Award Fee Evaluation Plan

A. Introduction

1. This plan covers the administration of the award fee provisions of Contract NNCO6BAO7B. The award fee
earned and payable will be determined semiannually by the Fee Determination Official ( FDO) in

accordance with this plan.
The Government may unilaterally change the contents of this plan not otherwise requiring mutual

agreements under the contract, providing the Contractor receives notice of the changes at least 10 calendar
days prior to the beginning of the evaluation period to which the changes apply.

Ww

3. The objective of the award fee provision of the contract is to afford the Contractor an opportunity to earn
fee commensurate with the achievement of optimum performance in pursuit of contract objectives and
goals. Optimum performance is not necessarily equated with the highest level of performance achievable
in all incentivized areas. Rather, it represents the most favorable degree of performance obtainable
considering the achievement of contract objectives in light of the Contractor's most effective utilization of

resources,

4. The Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) shail evaluate the Contractor's overall performance for the
evaluation period and recommend an adjective score and numerical range commensurate with that i
performance. The Fee Determination Official shall make the final determination of the amount of fee to be i
awarded. Each evaluation period will be 6 months in duration, unless otherwise noted. The first award fee
period will be 7 months in duration, from September 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007.

B. Method of Determining Award Fee

la. Total Award Fee Available

The amount of award fee available during any evaluation period will be the sum of the Award Fee priced
for the individual task orders for that period. However, the Contracting Officer may reduce the available
award fee if it is determined that cost estimates have been unreasonable or consistently inflated for any
individual Task Order or for contract-level (“distributed”) costs, For individual Task Orders, the entire
award fee amount may be removed from the pool, and for distributed costs the fee added due to the inflated
estimate may be removed. In performing this adjustment, the Contracting Officer will take into account
any demonstrated cost savings indicated by the contractor. Consideration will also be given to TR
assessment of the reasons for the Task Order cost underruns in excess of 5%. While the Contracting
Officer will consult with the contractor's Program Manager regarding any such adjustments, the final
decision regarding adjustments will rest solely with the Contracting Officer. Any award fee dollars
available during an award fee period and not distributed in the fee determin tion, will not revert back to the
award fee dollar pool.

Ib. Evaluation Factors.

The award fee evaluation consists of three numerically scored factors, Task Order Performance, Cost
Control and Business Management. The Award Fee Board will also consider as part of its evaluation the
achievement of Cultural Diversity Goals established by the Glenn Office of Equal Opportunity and the
contractor's ability to attract and maintain a qualified workforce.

C. Evaluation Criteria



Contractor will be asked to leave the meeting. The FDO will consider this self-assessment in determining
the award fee.

Contracting Officer's (CO) and Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) Presentation

The COTR will summarize and present the data submitted relative to task order performance. The COTR
will also rate the contractor's performance in the area of Business Management and the ability to attract and
maintain a qualified workforce.

The Contracting Officer will present the Contractor's performance in the area of Cost Control.

Board Deliberation

The award fee score as determined by the Fee Determination Official shall entitle the Contractor to
that percentage of the total fee available.

E. Areas of Responsibility

The duties of the AFEB and of others responsible for actions in the overall process are outlined as follows:

1.

wv

Fee Determination Official

(a) Subjectively assess the information presented at the award fee evaluation meeting.
(b) Consider the recommendations of the AFEB.

(c) Consider the TR's self-assessment.

(d) Make a determination of the amount of fee to be awarded for the evaluation period.

(c) Execute the "Notice of Award Fee" letter to be sent to the Contractor following the determination of
the award fee.

Award Fee Evaluation Board Members
(a) Attend a determination of findings presentation given by the COTR, CO, and others as required.

(b) Using the findings presented, and giving consideration to any other known performance data.
subjectively assess the Contractor's overall performance.

(c) Assign an adjective category and recommend to the FDO a range of award fee.
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative

(a) Receive and review semiannual evaluation Contractor Performance Reports from the Technical
Representatives (TRs) and CO/COTR.

(b) Ona regular basis, discuss with the Contractor all areas of deficiencies and positive points noted
in TR and CO/COTR reports.