alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rent-Way, Inc.
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: February 14, 2003                        /s/ William E. Morgenstern
                                                -------------------------------
                                                William E. Morgenstern,
                                                Chief Executive Officer




                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rent-Way, Inc.
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 14, 2003                        /s/ William A. McDonnell
                                                -------------------------------
                                                William A. McDonnell,
                                                Chief Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 18, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

RICK ABBOTT,

Petitioner.

No. 10-6061

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00159-HE)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, O’BRIEN, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Rick Abbott has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition asking this court to

prohibit the district court from proceeding with his trial, which is set for April 12,

2010. “A writ of prohibition is a drastic and extraordinary remedy which should

be granted only when the petitioner has shown his right to the writ to be clear and

undisputable and that the actions of the court were a clear abuse of discretion.” 

Univ. of Tex. v. Vratil, 96 F.3d 1337, 1339 (10th Cir. 1996). In considering

whether to grant the writ, we look to the following five nonconclusive factors:

(1) the party seeking the writ must have no other adequate means to

secure the relief desired; (2) the petitioning party will be damaged or

prejudiced in a way not correctable on appeal; (3) the district court’s

order constitutes an abuse of discretion; (4) the district court’s order

represents an often-repeated error and manifests a persistent

disregard of the federal rules; and (5) the district court’s order raises

new and important problems or issues of law of first impression.

Appellate Case: 10-6061 Document: 01018387202 Date Filed: 03/18/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Id. Mr. Abbott’s petition fails to address the standard for a writ of prohibition or

any of the factors listed above. Accordingly, he has not demonstrated his

entitlement to the extraordinary remedy of a writ of prohibition. The petition is

DENIED.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-6061 Document: 01018387202 Date Filed: 03/18/2010 Page: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               65,212
<SECURITIES>                                         20,660
<RECEIVABLES>                                       214,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         12,032
<INVENTORY>                                         157,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    488,996
<PP&E>                                               78,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                       46,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      621,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               234,695
<BONDS>                                                 655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                346
<OTHER-SE>                                          386,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        621,707
<SALES>                                           1,551,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,551,994
<CGS>                                             1,294,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      5,277
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      16,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                          7,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   8,514
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          8,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.24
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00740-CV

Zamick Tannarpatia Milhouse 

v.

Ebonie McCain

NO. 2006-74892 IN THE 311TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

CLK RECORD

CLK RECORD

$6.00

$77.50

$20.00

$97.50

$19.00

$71.00

03/02/2015

01/12/2015

01/12/2015

11/03/2014

10/02/2014

09/30/2014

UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$291.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this June 5, 2015.
#### MICHAEL AVIS v. AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 301

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randolph C. Kohn, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Coastal Banking Company, Inc. (the Registrant);



2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.  The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5.  The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  March 30, 2007

/s/ Randolph C. Kohn

Randolph C. Kohn

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

DONJOY, LLC
COMPUTATION OF RATE OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Historical
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Years Ended December 31,
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------
                                             1999         1998         1997         1996         1995
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes ...............  $ 9,515      $ 8,345      $10,904      $ 9,483      $11,440

Interest .................................    7,568           --        2,072        2,459          989
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs ......      409           --           --           --           --
Amortization of Discount on Sr. Notes ....      102           --           --           --           --
1/3 of rental expense-operating leases ...      895        1,064          775          765          546
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------

Earnings .................................  $18,489      $ 9,409      $13,751      $12,707      $12,975

Interest .................................  $ 7,568      $    --      $ 2,072      $ 2,459      $   989
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs ......      409           --           --           --           --
Amortization of Discount on Sr. Notes ....      102           --           --           --           --
1/3 of rental expense-operating leases ...      895        1,064          775          765          546
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges ............................  $ 8,974      $ 1,064      $ 2,847      $ 3,224      $ 1,535

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges .......     2.06         8.84         4.83         3.94         8.45
                                            ===========================================================
</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Anthony GRIGSBY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50400.

D.C. No. CR-01-00686-MMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2003.

*842Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Kevin Scott Rosenberg, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard D. Rome, Law Offices of Richard D. Rome, Van Nuys, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jerome Anthony Grigsby appeals his conviction and 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea for possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss in part and affirm in part.

Grigsby contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from the automobile he was driving. Because Grigsby knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered an unconditional guilty plea, we lack jurisdiction to consider this contention, and dismiss this part of the appeal. *See United States v. Floyd,*108 F.3d 202, 204 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissing for defendant’s failure to strictly comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2) requirements for entering a conditional guilty plea).

Grigsby also contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement to his offense level for obstruction of justice pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3C1.1.1 Upon review of the entire record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err by imposing the two-level obstruction enhancement, based on the perjured statement contained in Grigsby’s declaration in support of his motion to suppress. *See United States v. Ancheta,*38 F.3d 1114, 1117-19 (9th Cir.1994).

DISMISSED in part, and AFFIRMED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because the district court determined that the appropriate offense level was greater than 20, the appeal waiver contained in the plea agreement does not preclude our consideration of this issue.
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 

Fundamentals of Flight Word Search

Can you find the names of NASA’s two newest X-planes hidden in the puzzle?

□ Aileron

□ Airport

□ Altitude

□ Bernoulli 

□ Contrail 

□ Drag

□ Drone 

□ Elevator

□ Emissions

□ Gear

□ Gravity

□ Jet

□ Landing 

□ Lift

□ Noise

□ Pilot

□ Pitch

□ Propeller

□ Quadcopter 

□ Roll 

□ Rudder 

□ Runway

□ Thrust 

□ Vertiport

□ Weather

□ Weight

□ Wind 

□ Wing 

□ Yaw
Aileron—located on the wings; they generate roll

Airport—where most airplanes land and take off from 

Altitude—how high an airplane is flying 

Bernoulli—a Swiss scientist who studied how air moves 

Contrail—cloud made when water vapor condenses and freezes around small particles in 

aircraft exhaust

Drag—caused by air resistance; the force that acts opposite to the direction of motion 

Drone—an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) used to perform different functions 

Elevator—located on the tail section of airplane; controls the pitch of the plane 

Emissions—gases and particles found in aircraft exhaust; NASA is working to lower them. 

Gravity—the force exerted on all objects by the Earth and other objects with mass

Jet—a type of engine used to power aircraft

Landing gear—the wheels and support structures used to support airplanes while on the ground 

Lift—created mainly by the wings; the force that holds an airplane in the air

Noise—sound created by airplanes; NASA is working to lower aircraft noise. 

Pilot—the person who flies the airplane 

Pitch—the up and down movement of the nose of an airplane 

Propeller—pushes or pulls air; used to increase the speed of an airplane

Quadcopter—a drone with four propellers 

Roll—up and down movement of the wings; causes the plane to rotate right or left

Rudder—located on tail of the plane; determines whether the airplane’s nose moves left or right 

Runway—rectangular area of land designed for airplanes to land and take off 

Thrust—the force that moves an aircraft in the direction of its motion

Vertiport—often found near cities; where aircraft land and take off vertically (up and down) 

Weather—the condition of the atmosphere in a specific time and place

Weight—the downward force exerted on a plane by the Earth’s gravity

Wind—the movement of the air; important that pilots account for it while flying

Wing—the part of the plane that creates most of the lift when air passes over it

Yaw—the turning of a plane created by the rudder
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2044 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2044

            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2004

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed 
Mussie Tesfamical shall be held and considered to have been lawfully 
admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Alemseghed Mussie 
Tesfamical, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 1, during the current fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of PDC 1999-D Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_____/s/ James N. Ryan______________

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: __March 25, 2003________
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2057 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2057

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the United 
States Armed Forces for certain transportation expenses incurred by the 
  members in connection with leave under the Central Command Rest and 
 Recuperation Leave Program before the program was expanded to include 
                            domestic travel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION COSTS INCURRED BY 
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ON REST AND RECUPERATION 
LEAVE.
    The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse a member of the United 
States Armed Forces for transportation expenses incurred by such member 
for one round trip by such member between two locations within the 
United States in connection with leave taken under the Central Command 
Rest and Recuperation Leave Program during the period beginning on 
September 25, 2003, and ending on December 18, 2003.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### TINTON FALLS SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION v. TINTON FALLS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit (10)-v
                             BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED

                       DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                                   Amendment No. 1



     Pursuant to Section 12, the Plan is amended, effective
     January 1, 2000, as follows:

     1.   Section 7(d) is amended by deleting the first sentence
          thereof and substituting in its place the following:


          Earnings/losses on Investment Accounts hypothetically
          invested in mutual funds or other assets for which
          daily pricing is available ("Daily-Priced Investments")
          shall be valued daily in accordance with the relevant
          terms and conditions of the Daily-Priced Investments.
          Earnings/losses on Investment Accounts hypothetically
          invested in investments other than Daily-Priced
          Investments shall be credited effective on the last
          business day of each month.


     2.   Section 7(f) is amended by deleting the first clause
          thereof and substituting in its place the following:

          A participant may elect to reallocate amounts already
          in his/her Investment Accounts among the various
          Investment Accounts at such times and in accordance
          with such procedures as the Plan Administrator may in
          its sole discretion, prescribe;


     3.   Section 8(d) is amended by adding to the end thereof
          the following new paragraph:


          A Participant may make a change in the form of payment
          from the form previously elected to any other form
          permitted under the Plan at any time up to 24
          months prior to the date payments commence.  Any change
          elected within 24 months of a participant's payment
          commencement date shall be disregarded.



Dated ________________         BAUSCH & LOMB Incorporated




                                By______________________________




                                Title_____________________________