alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 10, 2011
/s/ Daniel J. DormanName:         Daniel J. DormanTitle:           President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 37 90

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Van ce Ra y

Mo ll er
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ri ch ardDoi sy, D r.; J as on Cafe r, Dr.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - J effe rs on Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ly 21, 2 01 4 Fi le d: Ju ly 24, 2 01 4 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Van ce Mo ll er, a ci vi l de t ai ne e at Fu lt on St at e Hos pi ta l, fil ed a 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 co m

pl ai nt na m in g Fu lt on St at e H o s pi ta l do ct or s Ri ch ard Doi sy an d Ja so n Cafe r. He al le ge d, am on g ot he r th in gs , th at de fen da n t s w e r e f or ci ng hi m to ta ke p s ycho tro pi c m ed ic in e, in vi ol at io n of hi s rel ig io us be li efs

. In th is in te rlo cu to r yap pe al , Mo ll er ch al le ng es th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de rs de nyin g h i s mo t io ns fo r 1 ap po in tm en t o f co un se l an d fo r a res tra in in g o rd er ag ai ns t Dr. Ca fer.
Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g Mo ll er’s m ot io n fo r ap po in tm en t of co un se l. See Ph il li ps v. Ja sp er Co un ty Ja il , 43 7 F .3d 79 1, 7 94 (8t h Cir. 20 06 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). As to th e m ot io n for a

res tra in in g or de r, whi ch th e di st ric t co ur t tre at ed as a m ot io n fo r a p r e li m in ary in jun ct io n, c f

. Ham m v. Gro us e, 15 F.3 d 11 0, 11 2- 13 (8 th Ci r. 19 94 ) (d en ia l of

m ot io n fo r te m

po rary res tra in in g or de r is no t rev ie wab le ), th e is su e is m oo t, be cau se in hi s pa pe rs on ap pe al , Mo ll er rep res en ts th at Dr. Cafe r is no lo ng er tre at in g hi m an d ha s m ov edto an ot he r pa rt of th e ho sp it al , c f. Iro n Cl ou d v. Su ll iv an , 98 4 F .2d 24 1, 24 2- 43 (8 th Ci r. 19 93 ) (cas e is m oo t whe re th ere was no on go in g act io n by ap pe ll ees to en joi n)

.

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Ho n or ab le Nan et te K. Lau gh rey, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.
-2

-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

ANTONIO SIERRA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 184 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal and Pro se Notice to be Heard Before a Judge are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1720 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1720

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2003

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
       To provide for Federal court proceedings in Plano, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHANGE IN COMPOSITION OF DIVISIONS OF EASTERN DISTRICT OF 
              TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 124(c) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by striking ``Denton, and Grayson'' and 
                inserting ``Delta, Denton, Fannin, Grayson, Hopkins, 
                and Lamar''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``and Plano'' after ``held at 
                Sherman'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraphs 
        (5) through (7) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; 
        and
            (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by inserting 
        ``Red River,'' after ``Franklin,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--This section and the amendments made by 
        this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of 
        this Act.
            (2) Pending cases not affected.--This section and the 
        amendments made by this section shall not affect any action 
        commenced before the effective date of this section and pending 
        in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
        Texas on such date.
            (3) Juries not affected.--This section and the amendments 
        made by this section shall not affect the composition, or 
        preclude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, 
        impaneled, or actually serving in the Eastern Judicial District 
        of Texas on the effective date of this section.

            Passed the Senate November 4, 2003.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ MATTHEW A. JONESMatthew A. JonesChief Financial Officer of the General PartnerNovember 8, 2007
#### ARNOLD SENATORE v. NEWARK STAR LEDGER.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

Blaine F. Bates

Clerk of Court

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White U.S. Courthouse

1823 Stout St., Denver, CO 80257

(303) 335-2900

November 06, 2014

TO: All Parties

RE: Galen Amerson v. Dennis King

BAP No.: CO-14-045

Bk. No.: 12-17345

The Court has today filed an order dismissing the appeal in the above case. A copy of the order 

has been served on all parties. In accordance with 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8016-3, the mandate will 

issue immediately after the time for filing a motion for rehearing.

Please contact this office if you have any questions.

Blaine F. Bates 

Clerk of Court 

cc: BK - CO

BAP Appeal No. 14-45 Docket No. 25-1 Filed: 11/06/2014 Page: 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE THREE AND NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      17,452,323
<SECURITIES>                                 4,540,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,638,582
<PP&E>                                       7,772,428
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,237,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,492,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,330,450
<BONDS>                                      2,545,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,923
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,538,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,492,142
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,421,371
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,508,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             652,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,202,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,202,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,202,964)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of P.D.C. Innovative Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul Smith, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 28, 2004

                                   /s/ Paul Smith
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Paul Smith
                                   President, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal
                                   Executive Officer
#### Christine BURSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-2585.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 2003.

Richard M. Lustig, Richard M. Lustig Law Office, Birmingham, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Joseph J. Allen, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Detroit, MI, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a motion to vacate her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on a claim that she was denied effective assistance of counsel. The district judge, who had presided over her trial, denied the petition.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in denying the writ.

Because the reasoning which supports its decision has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Memorandum and Order filed on October 18, 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,129                   4,608
<SECURITIES>                                     2,756                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,728                   7,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (536)                   (314)
<INVENTORY>                                        637                       4
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,328                  14,028
<PP&E>                                           5,128                   3,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,755)                 (1,078)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,867                  17,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,569                   8,905
<BONDS>                                              0                     996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                     977
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            38                      21
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,170                   4,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,867                  17,209
<SALES>                                         60,665                  50,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,665                  50,377
<CGS>                                           41,539                  35,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,989                  13,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    80                  (2,525)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (774)                   (138)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,959)                  4,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,650)                  1,702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,309)                  2,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.49)                   0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.49)                   0.09


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00358-CV

Ericelda Chavez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rafael Chavez, 

Sr., Deceased, et al.

v.

William R. Edwards, The Edwards Law Firm and Jo Emma Arechiga

On appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-DCV-2831-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion. Costs of 

the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 29, 2016.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00844

- CR

Frederick JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9050 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appella n t entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which appellant pleaded

nolo contendere to the offense of felon in possession of a firearm

. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The c lerk ’ s record, which includes the trial court ’ s r ule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See id. R. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. ” Id

.

The clerk ’ s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court ’ s certification that appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk ’ s record to determine whether trial court ’ s certification is accurate).

Appellant is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to r ule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal is made pa rt of the appellate record on or before March 12,

2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d)

, 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— SanAntonio 2003, order), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003,

pet. ref ’ d) (not designated for publication).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We

further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

________________________ _________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of February, 2018

.

____________________ _______________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1924

To provide for the coverage of milk production under the H–2A nonimmigrant 

worker program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. JEFFORDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide for the coverage of milk production under the 

H–2A nonimmigrant worker program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dairy Farm Workers 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF MILK PRODUCTION UNDER H–2A 

7 NONIMMIGRANT WORKER PROGRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the administra9 tion of the H–2A worker program in a year, work per10 formed in the production of milk for commercial use not 
2

•S 1924 IS 

1 earlier than April 15 or later than October 15 of that year 

2 shall qualify as agriculture labor or services of a seasonal 

3 nature. 

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) H–2A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER PRO6 GRAM.—The term ‘‘H–2A nonimmigrant worker pro7 gram’’ means the program for the admission to the 

8 United States of H–2A nonimmigrant workers. 

9 (2) H–2A NONIMMIGRANT WORKERS.—The 

10 term ‘‘H–2A worker’’ means a nonimmigrant alien 

11 described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Im12 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

13 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)).

Æ
II 

Calendar No. 457

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2043

To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Ronald 

Reagan Federal Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2004

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

MARCH 10, 2004

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL

To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

5 228 Walnut Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Federal 

7 Building’’. 
2

S 2043 RS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the building referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald Reagan Federal 

5 Building. 

Calendar No. 457

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2043

A BILL

To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, 

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Federal Building’’. 

MARCH 10, 2004

Reported without amendment