alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OurPets
Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of OurPets Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    STEVEN
TSENGAS                                       
|BY STEVEN TSENGAS                                           
|Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 31, 2011

This certification is made solely for the purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OurPets Company and will be
retained by OurPets Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001 “
March 22, 2022

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Arianespace
Reception on March 23, 2022

On March 23, 2022, Arianespace, part of ArianeGroup, will host a reception at Longview
Gallery in Washington, DC, starting at 6:00 p.m. The event will provide a forum for informal
discussion on satellite technology and challenges with attendees of the Satellite Conference.

Approximately 200 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, and
foreign government officials, including the French Ambassador. The estimated cost of the
event, including all food and beverages, is $200 per person. Arianespace is in control of the
organizing, planning and invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow
NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the
event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. §
2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees who do
not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the sponsor may accept an
invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances,
I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may
be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties. However,
NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under
Executive Order 13989 may only attend the event if they reimburse the sponsor the value of
‘the event.

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the Arianespace or ArianeGroup, such as procurement duties, program
management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate
determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation.

“An Adam F. Greenstone
#### In the Matter of Waymon Mitchell, Appellant, v Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 918]

Cardona, P.J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J), entered October 6, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Farole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Fetitioner appeared before the Board of Farole in 2002 for a hearing to consider his eligibility for parole release. His application was denied in March 2002, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner, *956following a subsequent denial of parole in March 2004, was granted a conditional release and released to parole supervision in October 2004. In view of these events, petitioner’s challenge to his 2002 determination is now moot and dismissal of the appeal is required *(see Matter of Hamm v Regan,*34 NY2d 992, 993 [1974]; *Matter of Eastman v New York State Bd. of Parole,*247 AD2d 740 [1998]).

Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A-2 for the yearended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/ JOHN C. GARRISON                         |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | John C. Garrison                             |
|               | *Principal Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|               |                                         |
| June 23, 2005 |                                         |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ICOP Digital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Savitri I. Poliah, Appellant, v Westchester County Country Club, Inc., Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 902]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered February 24, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which was to dismiss the cause of action alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which was to dismiss the cause of action alleging the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference *(see Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we conclude the complaint fails to state such a cause of action *(see Howell v New York Post Co.,*81 NY2d 115, 121 [1993]; *Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 303 [1983]), since the conduct complained of consisted of mere insults, indignities, and annoyances *(see Harville v Lowville Cent. School Dist.,*245 AD2d 1106, 1107 [1997]; *Leibowitz v Bank Leumi Trust Co. of N.Y.,*152 AD2d 169, 182 [1989]). H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1716

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the use 

of funds made available for nonpoint source management programs for 

projects and activities relating to the development and implementation 

of phase II of the storm water program of the Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 3, 2003

Mr. CHAFEE (for himself, Mr. BOND, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the use of funds made available for nonpoint 

source management programs for projects and activities 

relating to the development and implementation of phase 

II of the storm water program of the Environmental 

Protection Agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1716 IS 

1 SECTION 1. PHASE II STORM WATER PROGRAM IMPLEMEN2 TATION AND MANAGEMENT. 

3 Section 319(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Con4 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1329(h)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(13) PHASE II STORM WATER IMPLEMENTA7 TION.—A State may use funds from a grant pro8 vided under this subsection—

9 ‘‘(A) to carry out a project or activity re10 lating to the development or implementation of 

11 phase II of the storm water program of the En12 vironmental Protection Agency established by 

13 the final rule entitled ‘National Pollutant Dis14 charge Elimination System—Regulations for 

15 Revision of the Water Pollution Control Pro16 gram Addressing Storm Water Discharges’’, 

17 promulgated by the Administrator on December 

18 8, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 68722); and 

19 ‘‘(B) to implement a management program 

20 in a geographic jurisdiction for phase II of the 

21 program described in subparagraph (A).’’.

Æ
|   | **EXHIBIT 8.1** |
|--------|-----------------|

 

**List of Subsidiaries of the Company**

 

| Name | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|------|-------------------------------|

| CryptoLogic Callco ULC | Nova Scotia, Canada |
|------------------------|---------------------|

| CryptoLogic Exchange Corporation | Ontario, Canada |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|

| CryptoLogic Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. | Singapore |
|-----------------------------------|-----------|

| CryptoLogic Inc. | Ontario, Canada |
|------------------|-----------------|

| WagerLogic Limited | Cyprus |
|--------------------|--------|

| Ads Dot Com Limited | U.K. |
|---------------------|------|

| E-Cash Direct (U.K.) Limited | U.K. |
|------------------------------|------|
Return to Table of Contents | NASA Office of STEM Engagement Next Gen STEM 43

Appendix A. – Rubric for Engineering Design Process (EDP)

EDP Step Novice (0) Apprentice (1) Journeyperson (2) Expert (3)

Level of 

student 

knowledge 

(Score)

Identify the 

problem

(ASK)

Student/Team does 

not identify the 

problem

Student/Team 

incorrectly identifies 

the problem

Student/Team identifies 

part of the problem

Student/Team fully and 

correctly identifies the 

problem

Brainstorm 

a solution

(IMAGINE)

Student/Team does 

not identify knowns 

and unknowns

Student/Team 

incompletely 

identifies knowns 

and unknowns

Student/Team identifies 

knowns and unknowns 

using experience but 

uses no resources

Student/Team 

completely identifies 

knowns and unknowns 

using experience and 

resources

Develop a solution

(PLAN)

Student/Team does 

not brainstorm

Student/Team 

generates one 

possible solution

Student/Team provides 

two possible solutions

Student/Team provides 

three or more possible 

solutions

Create a prototype 

(CREATE)

Student/Team does 

not identify any 

consequences

Student/Team 

determines 

inaccurate 

or irrelevant 

consequences

Student/Team identifies 

consequences 

accurately

Student/Team identifies 

consequences 

accurately and provides 

a rationale

Test a prototype

(TEST)

Student/Team does 

not communicate 

results

Student/Team 

shares random 

results

Student/Team shares 

organized results, but 

results are incomplete

Student/Team shares 

detailed, organized 

results with class

Redesign based 

on data and testing 

(IMPROVE)

Student/Team does 

not contribute to the 

redesign

Student/Team does 

not improve the 

design or address 

concerns

Student/Team 

addresses one concern 

to improve the design

Student/Team 

addresses two or more 

test-based concerns to 

improve the design

Communicate 

results from 

testing 

(SHARE)

Student/Team does 

not communicate 

results 

Student/Team 

shares random 

results

Student/Team shares 

organized results, but 

results are incomplete

Student/Team shares 

detailed, organized 

results with the group

Total

Note to educator: You may customize the above rubric to better assess your group of students.
Return to Table of Contents | NASA Office of STEM Engagement Next Gen STEM 44

Appendix B. – Glossary of Key Terms

Icy-regolith - Ice and regolith mixture found on the Moon.

Ilmenite - A mineral composed of iron and titanium oxide. A major resource for oxygen on the Moon.

In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) - A practice of generating products with local materials.

Lunar dust - A very fine layer of regolith, or fragmented rock material, that is static and adheres to exposed surfaces.

Regolith - The loose, fragmental material on the Moon’s surface. 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers/hq

www.nasa.gov

For more, join our community of educators, NASA CONNECTS! 

https://stemgateway.nasa.gov/connects/s
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
I . 
223 
-able PstrUk 0. Naelaad, ?afgo 4 

The pertinent 8tEtUte8 In that opln%on and to 

thi8 ?sOt 8itIXatiOIiWe the I-. ~hillbeitQ$t~,OIlP 

oonelu8lon i8 t&t you have eoroeotly held t&t 8ubrequent 

to Jamaryl, 1940, therevu anew eaployingun%t and a 

nev arrployem. 

w. OMaindtul Of thOha??d8~JWthatOftOIIlW8~t 

-9Jlthir appllaationofthe 8trtUt~. Auemployervlthagoocl 

reoord that taker in a rmv Dartnor 18 penalMod by having to 

take the 88me tax rate as aaother f&at had a brd rate. tie 

oenaot *eqper tlle rtatute to 8Uit OuP'8On80 of Ju8tiee emd 

oqpitj vhen tlae legirlatwe hu #paken. Hwever, ue are adli8bd that thdl?b i8 18gi8ltbtiOXl nOV pa that vould JBrait 

the 8uo0em80~ to aoquire the employment reoord 0r it8 urlgnor. 

m &LIlAAG/ a, 

t!! 

Norrll Hodg 

A88lat t 

NNrdb 

znolo8uPe