alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

Blaine F. Bates

Clerk of Court

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White U.S. Courthouse

1823 Stout St., Denver, CO 80257

(303) 335-2900

September 04, 2014

TO: All Parties

RE: James Funderburgh, et al v. Susan Manchester

BAP No.: WO-14-024

Bk. No.: 07-10192

The Court has today filed an order dismissing the appeal in the above case. A copy of the order 

has been served on all parties. In accordance with 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8016-3, the mandate will 

issue immediately after the time for filing a motion for rehearing.

Please contact this office if you have any questions.

Blaine F. Bates 

Clerk of Court 

cc: BK - WO

BAP Appeal No. 14-24 Docket No. 42-1 Filed: 09/04/2014 Page: 1 of 1
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________
NO

. 09

- 1 2

- 00 223

- C R



### ____________________

RICHARD GOODWIN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No

. 11

- 10

- 11611 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

In this appeal, Richard Goodwin challenges the trial court’s ruling on his

motion to suppress. Goodwin requested findings of fact and conclusions of law,

but the record contains no written or oral findings on the motion to suppress

.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the jud ge who conducted the

hearing on the motion to suppress may a id this Court ’s review of the issues raised

in the appellant’s brief. See State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006).2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal is ABATED and the case is

REMANDED to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law

on the trial court’s essential findings on the issues raised in the hearing of the

appellant’s motion to s uppress. See T ex . R. A pp . P. 44.4. The supplemental clerk’s

record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are due to

be filed in this Court by July 8, 2013

. See T ex . R. A pp . P. 34.5(c)(2). All appellate

timetables are suspende d pending filing of the supplemental clerk’s record with

this Court. The parties may address the trial court’s findings of fact and

conclusions of law in supplemental briefs. The appellant’s supplemental brief is

due thirty days after the supplemental cler k’s record is filed. The appellee’s

supplemental brief is due thirty days after the appellant files his supplemental brief.

Requests for briefing extensions will be strongly disfavored.

ORDER ENTERED June 6 , 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.8


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                           HOUSEHOLD CAPITAL TRUST V


     This Certificate of Trust of Household Capital Trust V (the "Trust"), is
being executed as of March 21, 2000 for the purpose of organizing a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act 12 Del.C. SS. 3801 et seq. (the
"Act").

     The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

     1.  Name.  The name of the business trust formed hereby is "Household
Capital Trust V" (the "Trust").

     2.  Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the Delaware
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of SS. 3807 of the Act
are as follows:  Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North
Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19890.

     3.  Effective.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately
upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     4.  Counterparts.  This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more
counterparts.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.


                                         WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
                                         as Trustee


                                         By:  /s/ Patricia A. Evans
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                              Name:   Patricia A. Evans
                                              Title:  Financial Servicer Officer



                                         /s/ Benjamin B. Moss Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Benjamin B. Moss Jr., as trustee


                                          /s/ Dennis J. Mickey
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Dennis J. Mickey, as trustee
|    |                                                                                                             |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (“Rainmaker”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                   |
| /s/    TIMOTHY BURNS                                                          |
| Timothy BurnsChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH BREWINGTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 61 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter



# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 12-1354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. GEORGE F. RAYNER, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before Howard, Selya and Thompson, Circuit Judges.
Harold J. Hainke and Hainke & Tash on brief for appellant. Margaret D. McGaughey, Assistant United States Attorney, and Thomas E. Delahanty II, United States Attorne y, on brief for appellee.
January 18, 2013Per Curiam. This is a single-issue sentencing appeal.

It follows a jury verdict finding defendant-appellant George F. Rayner guilty of bankruptcy fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 152(1), and the district court's imposition of an incarcerative sentence of one year and one day.

The defendant's challenge to the sentence a s s e rts that the district court did not appropriately consider and weigh the sentencing factors limned in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and, as a result, fashioned a sentence that was greater than nec e s sary to provide just pun i s hment. We have carefully reviewed the district court record and the parties' briefs, and we find the defendant's argument to be meritless.

We need not tarry. The guideline sentencing range in this case is not contested; that range spans 2 1
- 2 7 mo n ths. The district court effected a downward variance in favor of the defendant and imposed a sentence of one year and one day — slightly
more than one-half of the low point of the guideline sentencing range. In doing so, the court explicitly considered and weighed the totality of the circumstances, including the factors prescribed by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

As best we can t e l l, the defendant's real complaint is not that the district court i gn o re d the appropriate factors but, rather, that it weighed those f a ctors differently than the defendant had hoped. Because the resulting s entence is neither
-2-procedurally flawed nor substantively unreasonable, it commands our

approbation. See United States v. Clogston, 662 F.3d 588, 592-93 (1st Cir. 2011); United States v. Dixon, 449 F.3d 194, 204-05 (1st Cir. 2006).

We need go no further. The judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).

Affirmed.

-3-
EXHIBIT 31-2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Kinley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Auteo Media, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 29, 2005

/s/ MICHAEL W. KINLEY
-------------------------------
Michael W. Kinley, President
 and Director
- Station Home
- Overview   - Station Overview
  - International Space Station Reference
  - Station Assembly Elements
  - Ground Facilities
  - International Cooperation
  - Station Facts
  - Station Visitors
  - Station Record Holders
  - Reference Guide to the International Space Station (PDF)
  - Station Lithograph (PDF)
- Station Topics   - Your Orbiting Laboratory
  - International Space Station Expeditions
  - Visiting Vehicles
  - Station Spacewalks
- Multimedia   - Space Station Imagery
  - Space Station Videos (YouTube)
- News Releases
- Station Blogs

## Expedition 32 News Releases

NASA Airs Video of Solar Eclipse As Seen From SpaceMay 23, 2012 – NASA Television will air time-lapsed video documenting images of the recent annular solar eclipse as seen from space aboard the International Space Station.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7741
COY RAY PHELPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ANGELA WALDEN WEAVER; CHARLES GRIFFIN; CHARLENE HARRIS; ROBERT LUCKING, Dr.; ARTHUR BEELER; BRUCE CAPEHART, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-04-439-1) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Coy Ray Phelps, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Coy Ray Phelps appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Weaver , No. CA-04-439-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2021 ND 6 6

St ate of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Arnold Nudah Rennie, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200307

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND , for plaintiff and appellee.

Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Rennie No. 20200307
Per Curiam

. [¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor.
[¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16 , N.D.R.Crim.P. , discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie’s motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.A pp.P. 35.1(a)( 4 )

. [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Belmont Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Bromwell Financial
Fund, LP, certify that (i) the Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 of Bromwell Financial Fund, LP fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bromwell Financial Fund,
LP.


BROMWELL FINANCIAL FUND, LP
By:	Belmont Capital Management, Inc., General Partner


By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer


Date:	July 3, 2007

<page>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 2, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

GLENN E. DUGGINS,

Petitioner.

No. 10-2166

(D.C. No. 2:99-CR-00777-JEC-2)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, MURPHY, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Glenn E. Duggins has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. “[A] writ of

mandamus is a drastic remedy, and is to be invoked only in extraordinary

circumstances . . . to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its

prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty

to do so.” In re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 568 F.3d 1180, 1186 (10th Cir. 2009)

(quotations omitted). In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Mr. Duggins

must show that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and

that his right to the writ is “clear and indisputable.” Id. at 1187 (10th Cir. 2009). 

Mr. Duggins asserts that he has been waiting for two years since April 2008

for a decision from the district court on his motion to modify his sentence. He

claims he never received any notice, order, or judgment from the district court

addressing his motion, although he acknowledges that he is now aware that the

Appellate Case: 10-2166 Document: 01018469149 Date Filed: 08/02/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

district court dismissed the motion in 2009. See Pet. at 2. He requests that this

court issue a writ of mandamus to the district court to “make a decision, notify me

of the decision and make sure that I receive the decision.” Id. at 4.

The district court has already made a decision on Mr. Duggins’s motion to

modify his sentence so this court cannot provide any relief in that regard. As for

Mr. Duggins’s request that he be notified of the decision, he acknowledges in his

petition that he is aware of the district court’s decision. To the extent that he has

not received a copy of the order, he has other adequate means for obtaining that

relief—he may contact the district court and request a copy of the order. 

Accordingly, we DISMISS as moot the portion of Mr. Duggins’s petition

requesting that we order the district court to make a decision on the motion to

modify his sentence, and we DENY the petition in all other respects. We also

DENY Mr. Duggins’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2166 Document: 01018469149 Date Filed: 08/02/2010 Page: 2
****

## Steve Garber

----

Stephen J. Garber is a policy analyst in the NASA History Division. He received a B.A. in Politics from Brandeis University, a master's degree from the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, a masterâ€TMs degree in Science and Technology Studies from Virginia Tech, and has successfully completed graduate coursework in National Security Space from the George Washington University.

Focusing on national security space, he has also done a detail in the Pentagonâ€TMs Space Policy office.  His chapter on orbital debris was published in the 2016 Space Security Index and another essay on debris is forthcoming as a journal article. He has several relevant security clearances and also works on declassification of historical documents.

  He has written on such aerospace history topics as NASAâ€TMs organizational culture, project management, the design of the Space Shuttle, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) program.  A policy history of President George W. Bushâ€TMs 2004 Vision for Space Exploration, written with a co-author, is forthcoming as a NASA History book in 2017.  He also has been published on intelligence history.

April 2017
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Dale Jarrett Racing Adventure, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Timothy B. Shannon
                                 ----------------------
                                 Timothy B. Shannon
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

December 8, 2009
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  November 11, 2005 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman,
     President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Humans in Space

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft launches on the Artemis I flight test, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022,...

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft launches on the Artemis I flight test, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022,...

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft launches on the Artemis I flight test, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022,...

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft launches on the Artemis I flight test, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022,...

On flight day 13, Orion reached its maximum distance from Earth during the Artemis I mission when it was 268,563...

art001e000672 (Nov. 28, 2022) On flight day 13, Orion reached its maximum distance from Earth during the Artemis I mission...

art001e000674 (Nov. 28, 2022) On flight day 13, Orion reached its maximum distance from Earth during the Artemis I mission...

NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission was successfully recovered inside the well deck of the USS Portland on...

NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission was successfully recovered inside the well deck of the USS Portland on...

NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission was successfully recovered inside the well deck of the USS Portland on...

NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission was successfully recovered inside the well deck of the USS Portland on...

NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission was successfully recovered inside the well deck of the USS Portland on...

Astronaut Scott Tingle is pictured during a robotics maintenance spacewalk.

NASA astronaut Andrew Morgan waters the plant pillows in which Mizuna mustard greens are growing for the Veg-04B experiment. Veg-04B...

Astronaut Nicole Scott installs the Fluids Integration Rack on the International Space Station, October 22, 2009.

The Expedition One crew members aboard the International Space Station.