alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2102

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the sale of a 
  firearm to a person who has been convicted of a felony in a foreign 
                     court, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 23, 2004

Mr. DeWine (for himself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the sale of a 
  firearm to a person who has been convicted of a felony in a foreign 
                     court, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearms Fairness and Security 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FIREARM SALES TO PERSON CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN 
              A FOREIGN COURT.

    Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by amending paragraph (1) to read as 
        follows:
            ``(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted--
                    ``(A) in any court within the United States, of a 
                crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year; or
                    ``(B) in any court outside the United States, of a 
                crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year (except for any crime involving the violation of 
                an antitrust law), if the conduct giving rise to the 
                conviction would be punishable in any court within the 
                United States by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year had such conduct occurred within the United 
                States;''; and
            (2) in subsection (g), by amending paragraph (1) to read as 
        follows:
            ``(1) who has been convicted--
                    ``(A) in any court within the United States, of a 
                crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year; or
                    ``(B) in any court outside the United States, of a 
                crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year (except for any crime involving the violation of 
                an antitrust law), if the conduct giving rise to the 
                conviction would be punishable in any court within the 
                United States by a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 
                year had such conduct occurred within the United 
                States;''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27451]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time:  Friday, November 5, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

Place:  624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
    <bullet> Approval of Project Outline and Discovery Plan for FY 2011 
Enforcement Report
    <bullet> Discussion of Possible Briefing Topics for FY 2011
    <bullet> Update on Status of Briefing on Disparate Impact in School 
Discipline Policies
III. Management & Operations
    <bullet> Expiration of Commissioner Terms
IV. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Wisconsin SAC
V. Approval of Minutes of October 29 Meeting
VI. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: October 26, 2010.
Martin Dannenfelser,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-27451 Filed 10-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement and related Prospectus (Form S-3 No. 333-115372) of eDiets.com, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90046) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-122763) pertaining to the eDiets.com, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated March 18, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eDiets.com, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLPCertified Public Accountants


Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

March 18, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|                    |                                                                                                              | 
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Dated: May 14, 2007 | /s/ John E. Yetter                                                                                           | 
|                    | John E. Yetter, CPA
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer) |
Presidential Documents

67587 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 211 

Tuesday, November 2, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 1, 2010 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Sudan 

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to Sudan, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), to deal with the 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy 

of the United States posed by the actions and policies of the Government 

of Sudan. On April 26, 2006, in Executive Order 13400, the President 

determined that the conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region posed an unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the 

United States, expanded the scope of the national emergency to deal with 

that threat, and ordered the blocking of property of certain persons connected 

to the conflict. On October 13, 2006, the President issued Executive Order 

13412 to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency and 

to implement the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act of 2006 (Public 

Law 109–344). 

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Sudan continue 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and 

foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on 

November 3, 1997, as expanded on April 26, 2006, and with respect to 

which additional steps were taken on October 13, 2006, must continue 

in effect beyond November 3, 2010. Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency with respect to Sudan. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 1, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27876 

Filed 11–1–10; 1:15 pm] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### The State, on the Relation of Johnson, *v.*Stewart and Others.

*Saturday, December*16.

Debt by the state, on the relation of «/2., on the official bond of the clerk of a certain Circuit Court. The breach assigned in the declaration was, that *B.*had recovered judgment in that Court for a certain sum of money against *G.;*that the judgment had been assigned *to the*relator, in the order book of the Court, by *B.*under his hand and seal; that the money had been paid to the clerk who had refused to pay it over, &c. *Held,*that *profert*of the assignment of the judgment was unnecessary.

ERROR to the *Carroll*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

— Debt against *Stewart*and others on the official bond of *Stewart*as clerk of the *Carroll*Circuit Court. Three breaches are assigned in the declaration. The first is, that *Stewart*did not pay over all moneys which came into his hands as such clerk and by virtue of his office, in this, to wit, that on the 28th of April, 1837, by the judgment of the *Carroll*Circuit Court, one *Simeon L. Stewart*recovered a judgment against *Samuel Grimes*for the sum of 2,259 dollars and 93 cents and costs, which judgment was afterwards assigned, on *the order book of*said Court, by said *S. L. Stewart*under his hand and seal to *Lewis*Johnson, the relator in this cause, of which the defendant had notice; that afterwards, to wit, on tire 13th of July, 1840, the sum of 2,400 dollars, the balance then due on said judgment, was paid to said *Stewart,*clerk, &c., and was received by hirmby virtue of his said office, which, although thereto requested by said *Johnson,*on, &c., at his said office, &c., he the said *Stewart*wholly failed and neglected to pay over. The second and third breaches are substantially the same as the first.

The defendants filed a special demurrer to the declaration, and assigned for cause of demurrer, that no *profert*was made of the supposed assignment of the said judgment by *Stewart*to *Johnson,*the relator. Joinder in demurrer, and judgment for defendants.

We perceive no valid objection to the declaration in this case. The plaintiff was not bound to make *profert*of the assignment of the judgment. Even if it were such an instrument as the party would be required, in ordinary cases, to show to the Court if he had declared upon it, yet in this case *10he is excused from doing it. It is apparent that the assignment was not in the possession of the relator, which was a legal excuse for not making *proferí*of it.

D. *D. Pratt*and *W.*Wright, for the plaintiff.

*J.*Pettit, for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
EXHIBIT 99.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Lewis N. Rose, President and Chief
Executive Officer of CryptoLogic Inc., certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of CryptoLogic Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2005

| | /s/ LEWIS N. ROSE
Lewis N. Rose
President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jenifer Cua, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of CryptoLogic Inc., certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of CryptoLogic Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2005

| | /s/ JENIFER CUA
Jenifer Cua
Interim Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
#### Bernard Vincent MONTGOMERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-40423.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Bernard Vincent Montgomery, pro se, Beaumont, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Bernard Vincent Montgomery, federal prisoner # 53653-146, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the validity of his convictions for methamphetamine manufacture, importation, and distribution. He asserts that his sentence is invalid in light of *Jones v. United States,*526 U.S. 227, 119 S.Ct. 1215, 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999). Because Montgomery is challenging the method by which his sentence was calculated, rather than the execution of his sentence, the district court correctly construed his petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See Jeffers v. Chandler,*253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 1001, 122 S.Ct. 476, 151 L.Ed.2d 390 (2001). Montgomery has not established that his *Jones*claim satisfies the test for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *See Jones,*526 U.S. at 251 n. 11, 119 S.Ct. 1215; *see also Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tex.,*305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir.2002), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1374, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003); *In re Tatum,*233 F.3d 857, 859 (5th Cir.2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2147

To increase the penalties for violations by television and radio broadcasters 

of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, indecent, and profane 

language. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2004

Mr. MILLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To increase the penalties for violations by television and 

radio broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, indecent, and profane language.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Broadcast Decency Re5 sponsibility and Enforcement Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR OBSCENE, INDECENT, 

7 AND PROFANE BROADCASTS. 

8 Section 503(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 

9 1934 (47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)) is amended—
2

•S 2147 IS 

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and 

2 (D) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; 

3 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(C)(i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if the vio6 lator is—

7 ‘‘(I)(aa) a broadcast station licensee or per8 mittee; 

9 ‘‘(bb) an applicant for any broadcast license, 

10 permit, certificate, or other instrument or authoriza11 tion issued by the Commission; or 

12 ‘‘(cc) any other company or individual that has 

13 participated in a broadcast described in subclause 

14 (II), including producers, general managers, per15 formers, and networks; and 

16 ‘‘(II) determined by the Commission under 

17 paragraph (1) to have participated in broadcasting 

18 obscene, indecent, or profane language; 

19 the amount of any forfeiture penalty determined under 

20 this subsection shall be 25 cents times the number of indi21 viduals who witnessed or heard the broadcast as deter22 mined by a viewership rating service selected by the Com23 mission. 

24 ‘‘(ii) Amounts collected pursuant to this subpara25 graph shall be used—
3

•S 2147 IS 

1 ‘‘(I) first to fund the enforcement costs of this 

2 subparagraph; and 

3 ‘‘(II) after funding subclause (I), to make 

4 grants to faith based programs selected by the Faith 

5 Based Initiative Office of the White House.’’; and 

6 (3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by 

7 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘subparagraph (A) or 

8 (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (A), (B), or (C)’’. 

9 SEC. 3. COUNCIL OF DECENCY. 

10 (a) COUNCIL.—The Federal Communications Com11 mission shall establish a Council of Decency which shall 

12 consist of—

13 (1) 3 individuals from the ministry; 

14 (2) 3 television and broadcast industry rep15 resentatives; and 

16 (3) 3 teachers from primary or secondary edu17 cational institutions. 

18 (b) DUTIES.—The Council of Decency shall advise 

19 the Federal Communications Commission on standards of 

20 decency as applied to broadcasts over which the Commis21 sion has jurisdiction.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

**Of Chief Executive Officer**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David R. Humble, the ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that: 

 

1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 22, 2005
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-16-1997 

# W i l li a ms v . Run y on
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 97-5035

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" W i l l i a m s v . R un y on " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 274. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/274

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-5035 Williams vs. Runyon, et al

The following modifications have been made to t he Court's Opinion issued on November 28, 1997 in the above-e ntitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion:

On page 3, second line from the top, the last word "sex" should be replaced with the word "sexual." On page 4, first line, the word "her" should b e replaced with the word "Williams'". On page 5 of the slip opinion, 10 lines from t he bottom: "Red. R. Civ. P." should be "Fed. R. Civ. P." On page 6, 5 lines into Section II, there shou ld be a period after "Fed." On page 6, 3 lines from the bottom, the word " defendants' " preceding right to raise...' should be replaced wi th "defendant's". On page 8, in the third full paragraph, the wo rd "the" preceding "Williams had exhausted" should be delete d. On pages 8 and 9, the last two lines of each: "April 24, 1995" should be replaced with "April 24, 1996"

Very truly yours,
/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk Dated: December 15, 1997
EX-10.9
LIST  OF  SUBSIDIARIES  OF  REGISTRANT


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Wellux  Industries  Ltd.,  a  Hong  Kong  corporation,  100%  owned.

Beacon  Light  Hong  Kong  Ltd.,  a  Hong  Kong  corporation,  100%  owned.











































    184