alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1990

To authorize the Economic Development Administration to make grants to 

producers of taconite for implementation of new technologies to increase 

productivity, to reduce costs, and to improve overall product quality 

and performance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2003

Mr. DAYTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To authorize the Economic Development Administration to 

make grants to producers of taconite for implementation 

of new technologies to increase productivity, to reduce 

costs, and to improve overall product quality and performance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taconite Research Act 

5 of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that—
2

S 1990 IS 

1 (1) maintaining our Nation’s domestic steel in2 dustry is essential to a peacetime or wartime econ3 omy and critical to our national defense; 

4 (2) about 98 percent of taconite is used in the 

5 iron and steel industry; 

6 (3) taconite is the principal iron ore mined in 

7 the United States; 

8 (4) Minnesota’s iron ore mining industry is 

9 vital to the State’s economy, is ranked 8th nationally 

10 in total nonfuel mineral production, and employees 

11 approximately 4,000 people; 

12 (5) Minnesota’s taconite production has de13 creased by 14,000,000 metric tons since 1998; 

14 (6) Northeastern Minnesota, which is heavily 

15 dependent on the taconite industry that needs new 

16 technologies, has at least 100 years of those reserves 

17 that can be economically produced; and 

18 (7) the Natural Resources Research Institute of 

19 the University of Minnesota has developed improve20 ments based on new technologies that taconite pro21 ducing companies can implement, which will reduce 

22 production costs, improve the quality of taconite pel23 lets, and produce a value-added high iron ore con24 tent commodity. 
3

S 1990 IS 

1 SEC. 3. GRANT AUTHORITY. 

2 The Economic Development Administration is au3 thorized to make grants to producers of taconite to imple4 ment new technologies to increase productivity, to reduce 

5 costs, and to improve overall product quality and perform6 ance. 

7 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

8 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

9 this Act $100,000,000. Such sums shall remain authorized 

10 until expended.

Æ
Certificate  No. 0  For_____ Shares
Forward to_____________________________

_______________________________________

Dated______________________ 20___


From when transferred

_______________________________________

Dated______________________ 20__


  No. of Original               No. of Original            No. of Shares
    CERTIFICATE                      SHARES                  TRANSFERRED

______________________     _______________________     _________________________

Received Certificate No. ______

For _________________ Shares

on______________________ 20___

_______________________________________

                               [GRAPHIC OMITTED]

                            ORGANIZED UNDER LAWS OF
                              THE STATE OF FLORIDA

                        EMPIRE FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY


           100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
           1,000,000 SHARES PREFERRED STOCK $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE

This Certifies that ________________________________ is the registered holder of
_______________________________________________________________ Shares

                Common Stock of EMPIRE FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has issued this Certificate to be
signed by its duly subscribed officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this __________________ day of _____________________________________
A.D. 20__.

                               SAMPLE CERTIFICATE

______________________________________       ___________________________________
              SECRETARY                                     PRESIDENT


<PAGE>

For Value Received, _________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
________________________________________________ Shares represented by the
within certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
_____________________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said
Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated _________________ 20___

In presence of ______________________________________.


   NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
     WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR. WITHOUT
              ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
REMUNERATION REVIEW


                                For: Hal Linstrom


                          Date effective: 1 August 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


<S>                             <C>
Base Salary                      $90,000   p.a.

Car Allowance                    $18,000

                             -----------
Fixed Portion                   $108,000

Variable Pay                     $35,000   50 % on BKI group achievement of NPAT budget
              (paid 1/41y)                 50 % on divisional achievement of NPAT budget
                             -----------
Sub Total                       $143,000   (distribution services group and distribution operations)

OTE Bonus                        $10,000   Paid only if BKI group annual NPAT budget achieved
                                                                            ($2m CAD to 31/3/2000)
                             -----------
TOTAL                           $153,000   p.a.
                             ===========
</TABLE>


In addition an "over-achieve" bonus is available if the Group Net Profit After
Tax exceeds $3m CAD. 15% of the excess profits above the budgeted level will be
allocated to the executive team in proportion to the respective fixed portions
of each person's package.

Next review proposed to be effective 1 August 2000.





Accepted: /s/ J.H. Linstrom
         ------------------------


Date: 29/10/99
     ----------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

—————————————————

IN RE HELMAN GROUP, LLC, 

 Debtor.

__________________________________

PREMIER MEMBERS FEDERAL 

CREDIT UNION C/O CENTENNIAL 

LENDING, LLC, 

 Appellant,

 v.

HELMAN GROUP, LLC, 

 Appellee. 

BAP No. CO-10-011

Bankr. No. 09-14935 

Chapter 11 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

July 20, 2010 

—————————————————

The matter before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) filed by

Appellant Premier Members Federal Credit Union c/o Centennial Lending, LLC, and 

Appellee Helman Group, LLC. The Motion requests that the appeal be dismissed as the 

parties to the appeal have reached a settlement.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion is GRANTED. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2); 10th Cir. 

BAP L.R. 8016-4(a)(8).

(2) Any deadlines previously set by the Court are VACATED.

(3) This appeal is DISMISSED.

BAP Appeal No. 10-11 Docket No. 19 Filed: 07/20/2010 Page: 1 of 2
2

(4) The mandate shall issue immediately. A certified copy of this Order 

shall constitute the mandate on appeal.

For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court

By:

Gregory Wright

Deputy Clerk

BAP Appeal No. 10-11 Docket No. 19 Filed: 07/20/2010 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2142 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2142

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2004

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 
                     Route, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL ROUTE.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 6 of Public Law 100-
515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$4,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$8,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``15''.
    (b) Grants.--Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in section 4, by inserting ``and, subject to the 
        availability of appropriations, grants for,'' after ``technical 
        assistance in''; and
            (2) in section 6(b)(2) by inserting ``and grants'' after 
        ``technical assistance''.
    (c) Strategic Plan.--Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 8. STRATEGIC PLAN.

    ``(a) In General.--Not later than 4 years after the date of the 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare a strategic plan 
for the route.
    ``(b) Contents.--The strategic plan prepared under subsection (a) 
shall describe--
            ``(1) opportunities to increase participation by national 
        and local private and public interests in the planning, 
        development, and administration of the route; and
            ``(2) organizational options for sustaining the route.''.

            Passed the Senate October 10, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### The State *v.*Bolt.—In error.

*Monday, December*18.

THE manner of selecting the grand jury is not a matter of which the Court can take cognizance, on a motion to quash an indictment. *Bellair*v. *The*State, 6 Blackf. 104.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20545

LILLIE PLUMBER-WILLIAMS

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

ALTA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; HARTFORD LIFE &

ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Texas at Houston

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges..

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the pleadings and the summary judgment evidence along

with the briefs and argument of counsel, we reverse the judgment of the district

court for the following reasons:

I.

The plaintiff alleged the necessary facts to assert all of the elements of a

breach of contract claim in her amended complaint and it was unnecessary for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 11, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20545

2

her to specifically allege that she intended to maintain her breach of contract

action. Accordingly, the plaintiff adequately pled a breach of contract action.

II.

With respect to the plaintiff’s non-contractual actions governed by a two

year statute of limitations, we are satisfied that cause of action on those claims

accrued no earlier than on April 28 or 29, 2005 when a payment due under the

policy was due and not paid. Thus the statute of limitations on these claims

would not have run until two years later or on April 28 or 29, 2007. Plaintiff’s

suit on April 16, 2007 was therefore timely. Prescription on these claims only

accrued when the insurer’s denial resulted in some damage or detriment to the

policyholder. See, e.g., Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc., 800 S.W.2d 826, 828

(Tex. 1990) (holding that limitations commenced when the insurer wrongfully

denied coverage because the insured "was unable to obtain much-needed medical

attention . . . and had sufficient facts that day to assert her . . . claim"); Provident

Life and Acc. Ins. Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 223 (Tex. 2003) (holding that the

insurer denied the insured's claim when it informed him that he was not entitled

to $7,500 in past benefits, demanded repayment of the $7,500, and refused to

provide continuing coverage under the terms of the insurance policy).

For the above reasons, the judgment of the district court is reversed and

the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with

their opinion.

REVERSED.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2089

To allow aliens who are eligible for diversity visas to be eligible beyond 

the fiscal year in which they applied. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To allow aliens who are eligible for diversity visas to be 

eligible beyond the fiscal year in which they applied.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DIVERSITY LOTTERY VISAS. 

4 (a) PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT STA5 TUS.—Section 204(a)(1)(I)(ii) of the Immigration and 

6 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(I)(ii)) is amended 

7 by striking subclause (II) and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(II) An immigrant visa made available under section 

9 203(c) may be issued, or adjustment of status under sec10 tion 245(a) based upon the availability of such visa may 
2

•S 2089 IS 

1 be granted, to an eligible qualified alien who has properly 

2 applied for such visa or adjustment of status in the fiscal 

3 year for which the alien was selected, notwithstanding the 

4 end of the fiscal year. Such visa or adjustment of status 

5 shall be counted against the worldwide level set forth in 

6 section 201(e) for the fiscal year for which the alien was 

7 selected, except that with respect to applications properly 

8 filed in 2003, such visa or adjustment of status shall not 

9 be counted against the worldwide level set forth in section 

10 201(e), and a visa shall be deemed to be available with 

11 respect to such applications.’’. 

12 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub13 section (a) shall apply to—

14 (1) immigrant visas made available for fiscal 

15 year 2004 and each subsequent fiscal year; and 

16 (2) immigrant visas made available for fiscal 

17 years 1998 through 2003, provided that the denied 

18 alien applicant, the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

19 the Secretary of State, or the Attorney General 

20 moves to reopen the alien’s case pursuant to proce21 dures or instructions which shall be provided by the 

22 Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of 

23 State, or the Attorney General as may be appro24 priate.

Æ
----

----

|   |   | Name                                                  |   | Country      of Incorporation |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| 1.     |   | AoHong      (Tianjin) Chemical Co., Ltd.              |   | China                         |
| 2.     |   | China      Chemical Group, Inc.                       |   | USA      - Florida            |
| 3.     |   | Micro      Sensor Technologies, Inc.                  |   | USA      - Florida            |
| 4.     |   | Shanghai      AoHong Industry Co., Ltd.               |   | China                         |
| 5.     |   | Shanghai      Binghong Trading Co., Ltd.              |   | China                         |
| 6.     |   | Shanghai      Wuling Environmental Material Co., Ltd. |   | China                         |
| 7.     |   | Sense      Technologies, Inc.                         |   | USA      - Florida            |
|   |   |                                                  |   |                          |
|   |   |                                                  |   |                          |
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2017 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2017

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the United States courthouse and post office building 
  located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ``Luis A. 
       Ferre United States Courthouse and Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE AND POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse and post office 
building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse 
and Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper or other record of the United States to the courthouse and post 
office building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse and Post Office 
Building.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES DE LISA.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1995

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the MA 
                   Regional Plan Stabilization Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2003

Mr. Daschle (for Mr. Feingold) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the MA 
                   Regional Plan Stabilization Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MA REGIONAL PLAN STABILIZATION FUND.

    (a) Purpose of Section.--The purpose of this section is to reduce 
the Federal budget deficit and to more efficiently use taxpayer dollars 
in health care spending.
    (b) Repeal of MA Regional Plan Stabilization Fund.--Section 1858 of 
the Social Security Act, as added by section 221(c) of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e);
            (2) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as 
        subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
            (3) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``subject to subsection (e),''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1851(i)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-21(i)(2)), as amended by section 
221(d)(5) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003, is amended by striking ``1858(h)'' and 
inserting ``1858(g)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-72730) and Form S-8 (No. 333-131016, 333-130381, 333-117007,No. 333-103663, No. 333-61248, No. 333-54976, No. 333-52634, No. 333-47020, No. 333-92619 and No.333-81492) of SonicWALL, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005, except for the restatementdescribed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2004 (not presented herein), as to which the date is May 16, 2005,relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, California
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

            (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2005 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Dated: December 13, 2005             /s/ Clyde B. Anderson
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Clyde B. Anderson
                                           Executive Chairman of the Board
# STS-53

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- STS053-(S)-002 -- STS-53 Crew Portrait -- These five astronauts have been assigned to fly aboard...

STS053-S-085 (9 Dec. 1992) --- The drag chute on the space shuttle Discovery is partially deployed during landing on Runway...

STS053-S-058 (2 Dec. 1992) --- The space shuttle Discovery, with a crew of five astronauts onboard, launches from Kennedy Space...

STS053-105-002 (2-9 Dec. 1992) --- A crew member onboard the space shuttle Discovery used a 70mm camera to capture this...

STS053-S-054 (2 Dec 1992) --- The Space Shuttle Discovery, with a crew of five astronauts onboard, launches from Kennedy Space...

S92-42679 (28 July 1992) --- STS-53 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, Mission Specialist James S. Voss, wearing extravehicular mobility unit...

S92-42681 (28 July 1992) --- STS-53 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, Mission Specialist (MS) Michael R.U. Clifford, wearing extravehicular mobility...

STS-53 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, is slowed by a red, white, and blue drag chute during its landing on...

STS-53 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, Department of Defense (DOD) mission Hand-held Earth-oriented Real-time Cooperative, User-friendly, Location, targeting, and Environmental...

S92-49644 (1994) --- STS-53 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, Mission Specialist (MS) Guion S. Bluford (left) and MS James S....

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- STS-53: Discovery

STS053-S-002 (September 1992) --- These five astronauts have been assigned to fly aboard the Space Shuttle Discovery for the mission,...