alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 204

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the floor for 

treatment as an extremely low DSH State to 3 percent in fiscal year 2003. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2003

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. 

SMITH, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, and Mr. DAYTON) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the floor for treatment as an extremely low DSH State 

to 3 percent in fiscal year 2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Safety Net 

5 Improvement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•S 204 IS 

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FLOOR FOR TREATMENT AS AN EX2 TREMELY LOW DSH STATE TO 3 PERCENT IN 

3 FISCAL YEAR 2003. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN DSH FLOOR.—Section 1923(f)(5) 

5 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–4(f)(5)) is 

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 1999’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘August 31, 2000’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘August 31, 2002’’; 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘1 percent’’ each place it ap12 pears and inserting ‘‘3 percent’’; and 

13 (4) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘fiscal year 2003’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) take effect as if enacted on October 1, 

17 2002, and apply to DSH allotments under title XIX of 

18 the Social Security Act for fiscal year 2003 and each fiscal 

19 year thereafter.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

DONJOY, LLC
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Historical
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                     2000         1999         1998         1997         1996
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes ..................      $ 5,159      $ 9,515      $ 8,345      $10,904      $ 9,483

Interest ....................................       15,876        7,057           --        2,072        2,459
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs .........          877          409           --           --           --
Amortization of Discount on Sr. Notes .......          205          102           --           --           --
1/3 of rental expense-operating leases ......        1,064          895        1,064          775          765
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------

Earnings ....................................      $23,181      $17,978      $ 9,409      $13,751      $12,707

Interest ....................................      $15,876      $ 7,057      $    --      $ 2,072      $ 2,459
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs .........          877          409           --           --           --
Amortization of Discount on Sr. Notes .......          205          102           --           --           --
1/3 of rental expense-operating leases ......        1,064          895        1,064          775          765
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges ...............................      $18,022      $ 8,463      $ 1,064      $ 2,847      $ 3,224


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ..........         1.29         2.12         8.84         4.83         3.94
                                                   ===========================================================
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of The Phoenix Insurance Company, Respondent, v Chris Kantlis, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 868]

*419Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J), entered August 18, 2003, which granted the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent Kantlis breached a condition of the underinsured motorists endorsement to his policy by failing to obtain petitioner’s consent to settlement with the insurance carrier for one of the tortfeasors in the underlying personal injury action, thus vitiating coverage and disqualifying him from receiving these benefits *(Matter of Integon Ins. Co. v Battaglia,*292 AD2d 527 [2002]; *Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Hardina,*225 AD2d 486 [1996]). The petition could also have been granted on collateral estoppel grounds in light of Justice Edward H. Lehner’s June 2001 order granting a stay of a prior demand for arbitration in this matter, which necessarily decided the issue of the breach of the consent provision. Kantlis had a full and fair opportunity to contest the issue of his breach in that earlier proceeding, given that the issue was addressed in that petition *(see Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295, 303-304 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1096 [2002]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Marlow and Ellerin, JJ.
**Exhibit 10.3.45**MODIFICATION OF SALARY ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND GEORGE B. TERHANIANOn September 12, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed thecompensation of George B. Terhanian, President, Harris Interactive Europe and Global InternetResearch, and approved an increase in Mr. Terhanian’s base salary from $255,000 to $275,000. Mr.Terhanian’s salary arrangement is part of arrangements related to his Employment Agreement (filedas Exhibit 10.3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on this Form 10-K).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                     APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                               5,037,355
<SECURITIES>                                                            51,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           63,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                             32,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     5,594,089
<PP&E>                                                               1,182,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         147,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       6,641,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  893,375
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                             9,060,785
<OTHER-SE>                                                           1,183,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         6,641,101
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                             0
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     2,235,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     (12,861)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (2,235,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (2,235,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.16)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Timothy A. Larkin, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Warren Resources, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over the financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors:  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Timothy A. LarkinTimothy A. Larkin,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 November 29, 2004 A signed original of this original statement required by Section 302 has been
provided to Warren Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Warren Resources,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. 4
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The
undersigned, Glynn Wilson, the Chief Executive Officer of TapImmune Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
April 13, 2010
  By:      
/s/ Glynn
Wilson________________________
 Glynn Wilson
 Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer,
 Principal Executive Officer and a
director
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

QUANTUM CODE CRUNCHERS

A Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN)
Binary Code Hacking Activity

| |GRADES 3 - 6] | NASA SCaN aims to use quantum
communications to safely send and receive space
data. Particles known as quantum qubits securely
transmit messages using combinations of “1” and
“0” to represent the data as binary code.

www.nasa.gov

| INSTRUCTIONS] | Convert the image on the left
into binary code on the right by matching up each
line and writing “O” to represent a white pixel and
“1” to represent a black pixel. The first three lines
of binary code have been completed for you!
UNION STATION KANSAS CITY, INC

Union Station Kansas City Inc NASA Team II 

Proposal

Kathryn Chambers

6/1/23 - 6/30/24

Union Station Kansas City/ Science City aims to reach 

underserved youth in the Greater Kansas City area 

(grades 9-12), letting them know that there is a place 

for them in astronomy and space exploration.

 

The program will provide at least 240 students with field 

trips to experience Science City, a live customized 

interactive planetarium show, and a space sciences 

workshop focused on subjects such as the Artemis 

missions, astronomical observing, stellar evolution, 

spectroscopy, & discoveries from the Webb Space 

Telescope. At the Observation Nights for at least 200 

students and their families, telescopes will be used to 

engage guests in observational astronomy as well as 

teach them about telescopes, optics, Moon exploration 

and the Artemis missions. Events will welcome all 

students, with a focus on accessibility for LGBTQIA+ 

students. The team will also reach over 800 students 

and their families by bringing short demonstrations and 

NASA activities to local festivals.

 

As one of the largest metropolitan areas that are 

furthest from any NASA facilities, this is a unique 

opportunity to bring NASA programming to an audience 

less experienced with all that the agency has to offer.

List of Partners:

• KC Center for Inclusion

• KC Pride Community Alliance

• KC Public Library Teen Programs

Out in the community • Greater Kansas City Area Public Schools

Credits: Union Station The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC23K0801, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Biography

Image Credit: Maria Werries

Mr. Harrison is responsible for leading the analysis and management of resources needed 

to successfully implement the strategic technical goals set within ARMD’s entire research 

portfolio. He supports the ARMD deputy associate administrators by reviewing and 

recommending portfolio investments that ensure proper scope, relevance, capability, risk 

level, and partnership contributions for program planning and execution.

Previously he was acting director of ARMD’s Resource Management Office (RMO), 

where he was responsible for employee development, budget formulation and execution, 

as well as initiation of the resource/portfolio alignment process begun following 

completion of the ARMD’s Strategic Implementation Plan. He arrived at this position 

after serving as deputy director, senior program analyst, and a program analyst within the 

RMO.

Prior to joining NASA in 2004, Mr. Harrison was a program analyst at the Department 

of State Bureau of Overseas Building Operations, where he managed a major technical 

security services contract, including recommending and achieving a drastic change in 

billing practices between the government and its prime contractor. He held additional 

positions in budget and finance at US Airways where he was instrumental in starting up a 

new airline, Potomac Air. He also worked as a project engineer at Pratt and Whitney and 

as a business advisor with the Peace Corps.

He has received several performance awards while at NASA, and several exemplary 

performance awards for budget and contract administration from the Department of 

State. He has represented ARMD at budget briefings to Congressional staff, and the 

Office of Management and Budget.

Mr. Harrison received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University 

of Illinois, and a master’s degree in finance from Cornell University.

Mr. William H. Harrison

Director of the Portfolio Analysis and Management Office

NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD)
#### Joel McClendon *v.*John & Wm. R. Stewart.

Petition — Allegations as to Value of Rent.

Where a petition does not contain any allegation as to the value of property charged to be in the possession of the appellant, nor of the annual rents and profits, and no evidence was offered as to same a verdict of the jury granting such rents and profits will be reversed.

APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 23, 1866.

Opinion op the, Court by

Judge Peters:

Action was prosecuted for the recovery of a part of a tract of laud claimed by appellees, and a verdict and judgment having been rendered against appellant for twenty-eight acres of land, and $200' in damages, he has appealed to this court.

In the trial in the court below, no evidence was offered as to the value of rents of the land recovered, nor was the quality or condition of the land in appellant’s possession proved so as to enable the jury to form any opinion on the subject of the value of rents and profits.

After giving the boundary and location of the tract of land which, they allege, include the land for which this action was brought, and their derivation of title to the same, appellees allege that the appellant had then and for three years past had held a part of the above-described tract of land in his possession, without right, and continues so to hold the same, to the plaintiff’s damage, $500. But do not make any allegations as to the quality or value of the part charged to be in possession of appellant, nor of the annual rents and profits, and fail to give such a description of the land as would enable the jury to determine what the annual rents would be reasonably worth.

The verdict of the jury for the $200, consequently, was not sustained by the evidence nor authorized by the pleadings.

The amended answer offered by appellant stated facts pertinent and proper for his defense. It does not appear that by permitting it to be filed any delay in the trial of the cause would have been produced, and it was responsive to material facts alleged in the *193petition. And although this court might not deem the rejection of said amended answer, of itself, such an abuse of a sound discretion by the court below or an error for which the judgment would be reversed, yet as the error first noticed must be fatal, and the cause for that reason remanded, the appellant should be permitted to file said amended answer.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to award a new trial and for other proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, M P Vijay Kumar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Sify Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sify Technologies Limited.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: June 19, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ MP Vijay Kumar               |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Name: M P Vijay Kumar            |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1931 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1931

      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 22, 2003

    Mr. Bunning (for himself, Mr. Miller, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Nelson of 
 Nebraska, Mr. Craig, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Smith, 
  Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Carper) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF APPLICABILITY OF SUNSET OF THE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND 
              TAX RELIEF RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2001 WITH RESPECT TO 
              ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 
Act of 2001 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to the amendments 
made by section 202 (relating to expansion of adoption credit and 
adoption assistance programs).''.
                                 <all>
```