alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Gas Company as of September 30,
1997, and the related consolidated statement of income for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         112,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626
<INVENTORY>                                      7,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,771
<PP&E>                                       2,050,182
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,118,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,281,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,306
<BONDS>                                        310,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    345,000
<COMMON>                                       142,917
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,281,610
<SALES>                                      1,187,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,251,412
<CGS>                                        1,113,864<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,113,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                111,736
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,778
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Gas purchases + Operating expenses + Depreciation.
<F2>Income per share of common stock has been omitted because all common
     stock is owned by Phillips Petroleum Company.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File Number 333-12156, Commission File Number 333-13818, Commission File Number 333-105213, Commission File Number 333-114668, Commission File Number 333-135218, Commission File Number 333-161796) pertaining to the Radware Ltd. 1997 Key Employee Share Incentive Plan, of our report dated April 29, 2010, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Radware Ltd. and its subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Radware Ltd., included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererTel - Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER  GABBAY & KASIERERApril 29, 2010
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

ESTACION ESPACIAL INTERNACIONAL

EXPLORE HUMANS inSPACE

Investigaciones y tecnologias en operacl6n continua en la

EE] fb.com/NASAes
Estacl6n Espacial Internacional: Aprende sobre las Investigaciones en la estaclén:
* Actividades educativas y culturales clencia.nasa.gov/ciencla-en-la-estacion
¢ Biologia y biotecnologia Explora STEM con la NASA: lecciones, juegos, actividades, y mucho mas: iw @NASA_es
¢ Ciencia fisica spaceplace.nasa.gov/sp

¢ Ciencia terrestre y espacial
e Desarrollo y demostracién de tecnologia
 Investigacién humana

Lee sobre como la Estaclén Espacial Internacional beneficia a la

humanidad (en Inglés): ()} @NASA_es
www.nasa.gov/statlonbenefits ~
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A of Sify Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosures and controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys
internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: October 12, 2006
    
    /s/ Raju VegesnaRaju VegesnaChief Executive Officerand Managing Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.37(c)
                        [ALTERA CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

May 22, 1998



Mr. Hiroto Nakamura
Department General Manager
North & South America III, Sales & Marketing Group
Electronics Components and Devices
SHARP CORPORATION
2613-1 Ichinomoto-cho
Tenri, Nara 632
Japan

SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF PRODUCTS SUPPLY AGREEMENT

Dear Hiro:

Altera Corporation ("Altera") and Sharp Corporation ("Sharp") have entered into
the LSI Products Supply Agreement dated October 1, 1993, as amended by Mr.
Rodney Smith's letter addressed to Mr. Tadahiko Ishino on August 28, 1996, and
as further amended by the letter addressed to you on May 22, 1997 (the "Supply
Agreement"). This letter will memorialize the understanding reached between
Sharp and Altera to revise the terms of payment set forth in the Supply
Agreement and the August 28, 1996, letter amendment.

Article 5, Paragraph (b) of the Supply Agreement provides for payment pursuant
to a letter of credit ("LC") payable at sight. We have agreed that instead of
these payment terms, Sharp will invoice Altera for wafer purchases on shipment,
with net thirty (30) day payment terms. Altera will open an irrevocable standby
LC in favor of Sharp at a mutually acceptable bank, presently Banque Nationale
de Paris, to back up Altera's payment obligations. The amount of the standby LC
will be as agreed upon by Sharp and Altera from time to time, and will be four
hundred seventy-five million (475,000,000) yen for the period August 20, 1998,
to August 19, 1999. This amount may be adjusted if there is a material and
sustained change in wafer volumes in the first and second quarters of 1999.
Sharp has agreed to give Altera written notice of any invoices not paid within
thirty (30) days, and to only draw on the LC if and to the extent that the
invoice remains unpaid after 15 days have passed since delivery of notice.

If the above provisions accurately and completely reflect the parties'
understanding of the arrangements described, please so indicate by executing and
returning to Altera a signed copy of this letter.

<PAGE>   2
Mr. Hiroto Nakamura
May 22, 1998
Page 2



Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,



/s/ DENIS BERLAN
---------------------------
Denis Berlan
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Altera Corporation



The foregoing is agreed to and accepted by Sharp Corporation this 8th day of
July 1998.

SHARP CORPORATION
By:


/s/ HIROTO NAKAMURA
--------------------
Hiroto Nakamura
Department General Manager
Sharp Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the annual report of China America Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dore Scott Perler,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


April 14, 2008                       /s/ Dore Scott Perler
                                     ---------------------
                                     Dore Scott Perler, Chief Executive Officer
                                     and President, principal financial and
                                     accounting oficer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 18, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LARRY WAGONER, an incompetent

person, individually; CHARILLA

WAGONER, individually, Conservator,

Guardian ad Litem, and next friend for

Larry Wagoner, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

v. 

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, 

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-8014

(D.C. No. 2:07-CV-00244-ABJ)

(D. of Wyoming)

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A certified copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-8014 Document: 01018386480 Date Filed: 03/18/2010 Page: 1
Learning Agenda

The NASA STEM Engagement Learning Agenda represents a systematic approach to identifying gaps in 

knowledge and conducting research to generate knowledge to fill these gaps. 

The purpose of this Learning Agenda is to put forth Learning Questions with associated sub-questions, 

Learning Activities and assessment methodologies, and Learning Products that will inform the NASA 

Office of STEM Engagement’s understanding of the scope, methods, mechanisms, and impacts of its 

investments. The answers to these questions will enable the Office to more effectively prioritize and 

narrow the focus of STEM engagement investment areas by making evidence-based budgetary, 

programmatic, and operational decisions.

The Learning Questions are strategic, intentionally developed questions that, when answered, provide 

evidence or new understanding to fill knowledge gaps and that may be used to more effectively make 

budgetary, programmatic, or operational decisions. Learning questions may be used to develop or test 

theories of change, fill gaps in technical understanding, develop scenarios, or identify effective practices. 

The Learning Activities are the strategies, tasks, methods, and mechanisms used to answer Learning 

Questions. The Learning Products are the documents, reports, infographics, Websites, or other items 

that are created to share the findings of the Learning Activities with internal and external stakeholders.

NASA’s Office of STEM Engagement Learning Agenda Theory of Change

The FY 2019–FY 2021 STEM Engagement Learning Agenda development process was guided by a theory 

of change, which posits: If strategic Learning Questions are developed, Learning Activities are conducted 

to answer the Learning Questions, and the evidence gathered from the Learning Activities is used to

create Learning Products, then the Office of STEM Engagement will be better equipped with evidence to 

make budgetary, programmatic, and operational decisions. The intended long-term change (outcome) 

of implementing this Learning Agenda is to develop a culture of learning and continual improvement 

within NASA’s OSTEM.

In FY22, NASA analyzed FY21 performance and participation data through the verification and validation 

process utilizing the NASA STEM Gateway System (Universal Registration/Application and Performance 

Management Tool) and key evidence-building activities in support of the FY19 – FY21 Learning Agenda 
(for more information, see the report brief on the FY19-FY21 Learning Agenda) . The findings and 

recommendations from data analyses and evidence building activities were shared with internal and 

external stakeholders in order to make programmatic evidence-based decisions and develop a new 

FY22-FY23 Learning Agenda in alignment with the NASA 2022 Strategic Plan and the 2020-2023 NASA 

Strategy for STEM Engagement.
NASA Employees’ and Applicants’ Rights under the Architectural Barriers Act

NASA is intentional in its efforts to hire and retain employees who reflect the diverse world in which we 

live and serve. Hiring employees with diverse abilities strengthens our mission, creates innovation, and 

enhances employee engagement. Individuals with disabilities are an important component of our diverse 

workforce. NASA continually works to cultivate and maintain a work environment that is inclusive of and 

accessible to all.

The Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) was enacted by Congress to ensure access to Federal facilities for 

individuals with disabilities. The law requires that buildings or facilities that were designed, built, or 

altered with Federal dollars or leased by Federal agencies after August 12, 1968, be accessible to 

individuals with disabilities. Facilities that predate the law generally are not covered, but alterations or 

leases undertaken after the law took effect can trigger coverage.

The ABA is enforced through standards for accessible design. The standards indicate where access is 

required and provide detailed specifications for ramps, parking, doors, elevators, restrooms, assistive 

listening systems, fire alarms, signs, and other building elements. Facilities covered by the ABA must meet 

these standards.

For NASA, the ABA Accessibility Standards are implemented through the General Services 

Administration’s Federal Management Regulation, Part 102-76-Design and Construction, Subpart C.

Individuals who have concerns regarding accessibility at NASA-owned facilities should contact the 

appropriate Center Disability Program Manager or Facilities Manager.

Ames Research Center https://eo.arc.nasa.gov/ 

Armstrong Flight Research 

Center

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/about/Organizations/Huma

nRes/equalopp.html 

Glenn Research Center https://www.grc.nasa.gov/odeo/ 

Goddard Space Flight Center https://eeo.gsfc.nasa.gov/sepm/individuals-disabilities 

NASA Headquarters https://www.nasa.gov/centers/hq/eodm/reasonable_accommodations

Johnson Space Center https://www.nasa.gov/offices/oeod/ 

Kennedy Space Center https://odeo.ksc.nasa.gov/ 

Langley Research Center https://oeop.larc.nasa.gov/ 

Marshall Space Flight Center https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/diversity/about.html 

NASA Special Services 

Center https://www.nssc.nasa.gov/eo 

Stennis Space Center https://www.nasa.gov/centers/stennis/about/organization/odeo/index

.html 

NASA employees and applicants can also file a complaint directly with the U.S. Access Board.
National Aer
Space Adi
John H. Glenn Research Center
Lewis Field

Cleveland, OH 4413:

December 10, 2007

Mr. John W. Morton

ASRC Aerospace Corp.
21000 Brookpark Road
Cleveland, Ohio 44135

Dear Mr. Morton:

The Award Fee Evaluation Board for the Glenn Engineering and Scientific Support-2
(GESS-2) Contract NNCO6BA07B met on November 29, 2007, for the purpose of
determining fee awarded for the second evaluation period, which ran from April 1, 2007
through September 30, 2007.

The input from the Board indicates that your performance over the second period was
excellent. Technical performance, as graded by the NASA Technical Representatives,
was excellent with 181 of 182 Task Orders rated “Excellent” or “Very Good”, and only
one task order rated “Good.” You also received “Excellent” ratings in the areas of cost
control business management.

The numerical rating of technical performance, cost control, and business management
factors resulted in a raw award fee score of 95.52 percent. The government team
informs me that the areas of concern mentioned in the Award Fee Performance-1
(AFP-1) letter, namely corporate responsiveness and local Business Office autonomy,
have been adequately addressed. Also, our Equal Opportunity Specialist tells us that
your efforts are solid, and there are no areas of under-representation on the contract.

In consideration of these factors, I am raising your score to 96 percent of the total award
fee pool of $1,061,123 for a total award fee of $1,018,678. I commend your efforts in
all areas of performance, and extend the appreciation of the entire staff of Glenn
Research Center for your contributions to our continued success.

While your achievement of cultural diversity goals has been good, | would encourage
more minority recruitment sites be utilized in recruitment efforts by your corporate
office. Also, I would like to see completion of the diversity training by your corporate
office, which has been an open action item since contract inception. I would expect to
see progress, if not complete resolution, of these issues by the end of AFP-3.


@ @

2

Finally, while corporate responsiveness has improved, I urge you to be vigilant and not
allow the shared services concept to interfere with the excellent customer support you
have achieved this period.

Sincerely,

iy WL i dee
ral ene ee
Fee Determination Official
#### Randy Bond, Respondent, v Daniel Giebel, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[787 NYS2d 512]

Mercure, J.E Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Reilly, Jr., J.), entered December 30, 2003 in Schenectady County, which denied defendant Daniel Giebel’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him.

In January 1999, while operating his snowmobile at night during a heavy snowstorm, plaintiff collided with the parked vehicle of defendant Daniel Giebel (hereinafter defendant), causing plaintiff substantial personal injuries. Although defendant alleges that his vehicle was parked on the lawn of a residence, the vehicle was indisputably in the traveled portion of County Road 94 after the accident. Plaintiff commenced this action, alleging as relevant here, that defendant negligently parked his vehicle within the travel lane of the road. Supreme Court denied defendant’s subsequent motion for summary judgment dismiss*850ing the complaint, concluding that a genuine issue of fact existed regarding the location of defendant’s vehicle at the time of the accident. Defendant appeals and we now affirm.

It is well settled that “to defeat a motion for summary judgment the opposing party must ‘show facts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of fact’ ” *(Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980], quoting CPLR 3212 [b]). Here, even assuming that defendant established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, plaintiffs proffer of photographs taken at the time of the accident, his deposition testimony and the police accident report—which, although hearsay, may be presented in opposition to a motion for summary judgment inasmuch as it is not the only proof submitted *(see Murray v North Country Ins. Co.,*277 AD2d 847, 850 [2000])—raise triable issues of fact regarding the cause of the accident *(see Perry v Pelersi,*261 AD2d 780, 781-782 [1999]; *Boyce v Vazquez,*249 AD2d 724, 726 [1998]; *Reuter v Rodgers,*232 AD2d 619, 620 [1996]). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion.

Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
#### SCI GAMES LIMITED, a British Corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. EIDOS PLC, a British Corporation; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-56045.

D.C. No. CV-03-03637-AHM(JWJ).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Valerie V. Flugge, Marc R. Stein, Stein & Flugge, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John W. Crittenden, Cooley Godward LLP, San Francisco, CA, James R. Patterson, Cooley Godward LLP, San Diego, CA, David Halberstadter, Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

This preliminary injunction appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit *813Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We subject a district court’s order regarding preliminary injunctive relief only to limited review.. *Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.,*198 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir.1999). Our review of an order regarding a preliminary injunction “is much more limited than review of an order involving a permanent injunction, where all conclusions of law are freely reviewable.” *Id.*A decision regarding a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs only if the district court based its decision on either an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings. *Id.*

We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion here. We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction. Our disposition will affect the rights of the parties only until the district court renders final judgment. *Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International,*686 F.2d 750, 752 (9th Cir.1982).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.