alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 

Tornado in a Bottle

 

Suggested Grades: K-8 

Activity Overview

In this activity, you will observe the creation of a water

vortex by swirling water in a bottle. The swirling motion 

of the bottle creates a vacuum. The motion also creates

a pathway for the air as the water moves the air mass

below. 

Note: You may need the help of an adult to make a hole 

in the soda bottle cap.

Steps

1. Have an adult make a small hole (about 0.25 

inches or 7 mm) near the center of the soda

bottle cap. See Figure 1. 

 Figure 1. Drill a small hole in the soda bottle cap

2. Using the duct or electrical tape, secure the cap upside-down onto the bottle so that the 

threads are exposed. See Figure 2. 

Time: 20 minutes 

Materials

• Two empty soda bottles, washed 

and with the labels removed (1- or 

2-liter bottles work well), with 

one cap (The other cap can be 

discarded.) 

• Drill or other means of making a 

hole in the bottle lid

• Strong tape, such as duct tape or 

electrical tape

• Water

• Food coloring 
Figure 2. Attach the cap, upside down, to the top of one bottle

3. Fill the other bottle 2/3 full of water and add a few drops of food

coloring. 

4. Connect the other bottle assembly to the top of the bottle with water

in it. See Figure 3.

5. Invert the bottles so that the bottle containing the water is on top. 

6. Start swirling the bottle assembly. Caution: Do not shake! As the

rotational speed increases, a water vortex will form in the upper

bottle and water will start flowing smoothly into the lower bottle.

See Figure 4. 

Figure 3.Connect 

the bottles

 Figure 4. Swirl the bottle to create the vortex

The swirling water is creating a water vortex. The vortex is a funnel shape with a hollow center, 

just like a tornado. As such, the air from the bottle below can now pass unrestricted through the 

center of the vortex and into the bottle above. 
Background Information

Weather is the state of the atmosphere, including wind speed and direction, temperature, moisture 

and pressure. A pilot needs to consider these things while flying since they have a significant 

impact on the ability of both the airplane and the pilot to perform properly. 

When flying long distances, it is quite common to take off and land in completely different weather 

conditions. Weather conditions also vary along the flight path. Since weather systems are often 

localized, conditions may change even if you have only flown a few miles. Before pilots take off, 

it is important that they fully understand how the weather will affect their flight. Some of the items 

most commonly checked before a flight are wind, temperature and pressure, clouds (height and 

type) and dew point. Pilots need to be especially aware of severe weather like thunderstorms, 

tornados and snowstorms.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHARLENE ROSA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2004

[ September 2 5 , 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04

- 10827CF10A

.

Charlene Rosa, Ocala, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 12.1


                            AES Eastern Energy, L.P.
             Statements Regarding Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                      (In Thousands, Except Ratio Amounts)

                                                            Period From May 14,
                                         Year Ended         1999 (Inception) to
                                      December 31, 2000         Dec. 31, 1999
                                   -------------------      -------------------

Income from Continuing Operations       $ 98,237                       $24,415

Add:  Fixed Charges                       57,314                        38,906
Add:  Amortization of Capitalized Interest   173                            95
Less: Interest Capitalized                    -                         (5,187)
                                        ----------                   ----------

Earnings                                 155,724                        58,229
                                       -----------                   ----------

Fixed Charges:
Add:  Interest expense and
      capitalized amounts (including
      construction related fixed
      charges)                            57,314                        33,719
Add: Interest capitalized                      -                         5,187
                                       ----------                   ----------

Total Fixed Charges                    $  57,314                       $38,906
                                       ==========                   ===========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          2.72                          1.50
                                       ==========                  ============
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

TUSKEGEE AIRMEN

fighting to fly

COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS

1.	 Before World War II, why were black men not allowed to fly?

2.	 In what country did Black men prove they could fly during World War I?

3.	 How many Black men learned to fly at Tuskegee University between 1941 and 1946?

4.	 What is a squadron?

5.	 Other than pilots, what other professions made up a squadron?

6.	 Why was the P-51 Mustang the most famous airplane that the Tuskegee Airmen flew?

7.	 Why were the planes the Tuskegee Airmen flew called “Red Tails?”

8.	 Why were the Tuskegee Airmen arrested in 1945?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

TUSKEGEE AIRMEN

fighting to fly

COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS

9.	 How did the Tuskegee Airmen compare to White pilots in a 1945 report?

10.	Even though the 1945 report asked that more ways be added for Black men and women to serve in the military,

what did the report NOT do?

11.	In 1948, what did President Harry S. Truman order based on the success of the Tuskegee Airmen in World War II?

12.	Identify the statistics of the Tuskegee Airmen that proved they were as good as any pilots during World War II.

13.	What fact has been misrepresented about the Tuskegee Airmen over the years? What is the truth?

14.	In addition to their contribution in helping the U.S. win the war in Europe, what did the experience of the Tuskegee

Airmen help to do?

15.	How has the story of the Tuskegee Airmen inspired people?
Agreement  Company  Participant
 Plan
 Committee
  Award
 Grant Award  Restricted Stock Units Stock
 Plan Incorporated
 Rights of Participant with Respect to the Restricted Stock Units
 No Shareholder Rights
 Conversion of Restricted Stock Units; Issuance of Stock




---



##### 



Compliance with Securities Laws
 Vesting; Forfeiture
 Forfeiture
 Vesting
 Change in Control
 Date of Termination Date of
Termination
 2




---



##### 



Restrictions on Transfer
 Relationship to Company
  No Guarantee of Service
 NonCompetition; Non-Solicitation
 Consideration for this Section.
   3




---



##### 



Restricted Activity
   4




---



##### 



Remedies
 5




---



##### 



Income Tax Matters
 Committees Powers
 Binding Effect
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
   HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (Participant)Title:
    
    
    
    
    
    Dated:
 6
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6396-6397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors.

[[Page 6397]]

Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve 
Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 24, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Capital Z Partners III GP, LTD; Capital Z Partners III GP, L.P., 
both of George Town, Cayman Islands; Capital Z Partners Management, 
LLC, Dover, Delaware; Capital Z Partners III, L.P., George Town, Cayman 
Islands; and Bradley E. Cooper, and Robert A. Spass, both of New York, 
New York, as principals, to acquire at voting shares of Opportunity 
Bancshares, Inc., Bettendorf, Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Opportunity Bank, N.A., Richardson, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 4, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-2755 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MANUEL CANO.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009
of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) upon my best knowledge and belief
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|                          |                                                                                                                | 
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  November 12, 2009 | /s/ Edward J. Quilty                                                                                           | 
|                          | Edward J. Quilty
        Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1041

 (D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02849-ZLW)

ORDER

Appellant has failed to file a response to the show cause order that the court filed

on March 18, 2010; accordingly, this appeal is dismiss for failure to prosecute. See 10th

Cir. R. 42.1. A copy of this order shall stand as the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1041 Document: 01018403402 Date Filed: 04/15/2010 Page: 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS10-8]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: FDIC Building, 1776 F Street, NW., Room 4085, Washington, 
DC 20429.
    Date: November 10, 2010.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    October 13, 2010 minutes--Open Session.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

    Maryland Compliance Review Report and letter,
    Massachusetts Compliance Review Report and letter,
    Minnesota Compliance Review Report and letter.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    E-mail your name, organization and contact information to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#19747c7c6d70777e6a59786a7a377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25484040514c4b4256654456460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.
    You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or 
commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street, 
NW., Ste. 760, Washington, DC 20005. Your request must be received no 
later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the Monday prior to the meeting. If that 
Monday is a Federal holiday, then your request must be received 4:30 
p.m., ET, on the previous Friday. Attendees must have a valid 
government-issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable 
security measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis.

    Dated: October 29, 2010.
Deborah S. Merkle,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010-27911 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.31

March 22, 2000



DELIVERED VIA FACSIMILE AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Richard A. Jalkut
27 Captain Theale Road
Bedford, NY 10506


Dear Dick,

On behalf of Birch Telecom, I am pleased and excited to offer you the position
of Non-Executive Chairman of the Board.

The position's term length will be three years if Birch adopts a staggered Board
structure, and one year if it does not. If Birch does not adopt a staggered
Board structure, all terms will be one-year terms.
Additional details of the offer are as follows:

o        An annual retainer fee in the amount of $5,000 and expense
         reimbursement for Board meetings.

o        An initial grant of 30,000 stock options to be made at the exercise
         price of $7.50 per share. This grant has a four-year vesting schedule.

o        An initial grant of 10,000 stock options to occur at the time of an
         Initial Public Offering (exercise at IPO strike price).

o        Yearly grants of 5,000 stock options made each year at the time of the
         annual meeting.

o        You have agreed to purchase $200,000 in common shares at $7.50 per
         share. You agree to execute customary lock-up agreements with
         underwriters in connection with any public offering, and we will grant
         you registration and other rights commensurate with the rights of other
         purchasers of our capital stock.

o        Directors and officers insurance in the amount of $25,000,000.

o        You represent to us that you are an "accredited investor" as defined in
         Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 and that you are acquiring
         these shares for investment and without a view to making a
         distribution.

<PAGE>

The Board meetings are held on a quarterly basis (typically once in New York,
once in California and twice in Missouri). The remaining board meetings for 2000
are tentatively scheduled for April 26, August 16 and October 25. The upcoming
April 26 Board meeting will be held in New York.

Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing both copies in the
space provided. Retain one copy for your records and return the other in the
enclosed envelope for our files. Welcome to Birch, we're very happy to have you
aboard.

Sincerely,


David E. Scott
President and Chief Executive Officer


Offer accepted by:


/s/ Richard A. Jalkut
_____________________                                ________________________
Richard A. Jalkut                                             Date
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1070

_____________________________

KEVIN HILAIRE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

March 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL and MAKAR, JJ., and BRASINGTON, MONICA J.,

ASSOCIATE JUDGE, concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 1133** 

DAVID MICHAEL MONTGOMERY ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

CONMED, INC. ,
Defendant

– Appellee ,
and
JASON BINGHAM, Cpl.; JOHN CARHART, Sgt.; SENIOR TROOPER CLAYCOMB; FRANK FORNOSS, Str.; STRED WINKLER, Senior Trooper; SGT. GALLIGAN; SCOTT PEDERSON; K. R. JENKINS, Officer; JAMIE GROVER, Officer; CHRIS TAYLOR, Tfc.; EDWARD EICHER, Sgt.; TPR BISHOP; THE CARROLL COUNTY JAIL; MR. HARDINGER, Warden; ANNE ARUNDE L COUNTY POLICE; STATE POLICE WESTMINSTER ,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00930

- ELH )

Submitted : April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016

Before AGEE , DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.2 David Michael Montgomery , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Althauser , Megan Green Anderson , Eric Matthew Rigatuso , ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC , Hanover, Marylan d, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
David Michael Montgomery seeks to appeal the district

court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 )
complaint. The notice of appeal was received in the district
court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because

Montgomery is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of
the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for
mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Housto n v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not reveal when Montgomery
gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing.
Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of
allowing the district court to obtain this information from t he
parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as
supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further

consideration.

REMANDED
**Exhibit 10.5.9**RENT REVIEW MEMORANDUM     LANDLORD : SILK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED     TENANT : BUSINESS & MARKET RESEARCH LIMITED     PROPERTY : RELATING TO PORTION OF BUILDING KNOWN ASWOOD STREET MILL, WOOD STREET, MACCLESFIELD.     LEASE DATED : 18/08/1997By this Memorandum dated the 19th July 2002 Silk Developments Limited as Landlord andBusiness and Market Research Limited as Tenant desire to record an agreement to vary the rentpayable under the review provisions of the Lease with the effect from the review date of18th August 2002 the rent payable will be £14,877.00 (fourteen thousand eight hundredand seventy seven pounds) per annum up to the next rent review date 18th August 2007.     Signed : [ILLEGIBLE]  SilkDevelopments Limited Dated : 30/8/2002     Signed : [ILLEGIBLE] Dated : 30/8/02       Business and Market Research Limited
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41070 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PATRICK DEAN COOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-15-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Patrick Dean Cooks appeals his conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the district court erred in holding him accountable, for purposes of sentencing, for the entire amount of cocaine base found in the vehicle in which he was traveling. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Cooks was part of a jointly undertaken criminal activity and that the entire amount of cocaine base was foreseeable to him, thus making him accountable for the entire amount. See UnitedNo. 97-41070 -2- States v. Garcia , 86 F.3d 394, 400 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 752 (1997); United States v. Hernandez-Coronado , 39 F.3d 573, 574 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.
S. 1895

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To temporarily extend the programs under the Small Business Act and the Small

Business Investment Act of 1958 through March 15, 2004, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM AUTHORITY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Any program, authority, or provision,

including any pilot program, authorized under the Small Business

Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) or the Small Business Investment

Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) as of September 30, 2003,

that is scheduled to expire on or after September 30, 2003 and

before March 15, 2004, shall remain authorized through March

15, 2004, under the same terms and conditions in effect on September 30, 2003.

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), section

303(g)(2) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.

683(g)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘1.38 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘1.46

percent’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Sitemap

## October 03, 2008

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2008
- 10
- October 03, 2008

            - Back to the Future