alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### *Ex parte*Smith, an Alien.

The declaration of an alien of his intention to become a citizen- of the *United States,*stated that it was *Iona fide*his intention to become a citizen of the *United States*of *America,*and to renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, and sovereignty whatever, and particularly to the queen of *Great Britain*and *Ireland,*according to the several acts of congress in such cases made and provided. *Held,*that the declaration was not objectionable because the name of the queen was not stated.

ERROR, to the *Daviess*Circuit Court.

. . , Blackford, J.

. . , This was an application m the Circuit Court by *Smith,*an alien, to be admitted a citizen of the *United States.*He produced the following evidence of his declaration of intention to become a citizen of the *United States,*viz.:

“ *United States of America.*The State of *Ohio, Hamilton*county, ss. Court of Common Pleas of the term of *October,*1840. *Bernard Smith,*a native of *Ireland,*aged about thirty-four years, bearing allegiance to the queen of *Great Britain*and *Ireland,*who emigrated from *Liverpool*in 1833,- and arrived at *New York*on the 8th of *July,*1833, and who *396intends to reside within the jurisdiction and under the government of the *United States,*to *wit,'Hamilton*county; and he makes report of himself for naturalization, and declares on oath in open court, that it is *bona fide*his intention to become a citizen of the *United States*of *America,*and to renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, and sovereignty whatever, and particularly to the queen of *Great Britain*and *Ireland,*according to the several acts of congress in such case's made and provided. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Court of Common Pleas, at *Cincinnati,*this 12th day of *October,*A. D. 1840. *W. H. Harrison,*Clk., by *T. J. Snyder,*Dep. [Seal.] ”

*C. P. Hester,*for the plaintiff.

The Circuit Court considered this declaration of intention to be insufficient, and accordingly refused the application.

The declaration is objected to, because the party in declaring his intention to renounce his allegiance to the queen of *Great Britain*and *Ireland,*does not give *the*name *of the*queen, viz., *Victoria.*We do not think the objection should prevail. The meaning of the declaration is the same as if the name of the queen had been inserted. The party by declaring his intention to renounce all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, and sovereignty whatever, and particularly to the queen of *Great Britain*and *Ireland,*has complied substantially with the act of congress on the subject.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
#### KENTMASTER MANUFACTURING CO., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JARVIS PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a Connecticut Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-56341.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 20, 1999.

Before: PREGERSON, HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on June 11, 1998 is amended as follows:

> Slip Op. Pages 5825-26 [146 F.3d at 695]: Delete the last half of the final paragraph beginning with “In the same way.” Replace with the following: “For similar reasons, the claim for unfair competition under §§ 17200 and 17203 of Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code also fails. While these provisions are ‘intentionally broad,’ when considering allegations of unfair conduct they are only meant to allow ‘courts maximum discretion to prohibit new schemes to defraud.’ *Podolsky v. First Healthcare Corp.,*50 Cal.App.4th 632, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 89, 98 (Cal.Ct.App.1996) (internal quotations omitted). In evaluating conduct under this statute, the court is to consider the benefits of the defendant’s conduct and the harm claimed by the victim. *See id.*Our holding above precludes any possible finding that Jarvis has enacted any scheme to defraud, and its actions, consistent with those of a competitive business, only benefit consumers.”

> Slip Op. Page 5826, 'first full paragraph, at the end of the paragraph add [146 F.3d at 695]: “Moreover, Jarvis’ conduct cannot be said to be ‘unjustified and wrongful.’ *Id.*(internal quotation omitted).”
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE In connection with the annual report of GeneMax Corp. (the company) on Form 10-KSB/A for
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:  1.
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act; and2.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. Date: April 29, 2005
    
    Konstantine SarafisKonstantine Sarafis, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### HAKER-VOLKENING v. HAKER

No. 363P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 688

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, David W. Heard and David J. Peters, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Somera Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
of Somera Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Somera Communications, Inc.



By:

/s/ DAVID W. HEARDName: David W. HeardTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 31, 2005By:

/s/ DAVID J. PETERSName: David J. PetersTitle: Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 31, 2005
# Space Environments Complex

The Space Environments Complex (SEC) houses the largest and most powerful space environment simulation facilities in the world.  This includes the largest space simulation vacuum chamber, most powerful spacecraft acoustic test chamber and the world’s highest capacity and most powerful spacecraft shaker system.  Located at NASA’s Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility in Sandusky, Ohio, we invite you to click on the arrows or any of the icons to learn more about the amazing capabilities of the SEC and see testing in action.

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    SEC: Aerial View

    SEC: High Bay

    SEC: Vacuum Chamber

    SEC: RATF/MVF

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2166 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2166

     To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt abortions of 
  pregnancies in cases of rape and incest from a limitation on use of 
                      Department of Defense funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2004

  Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Ms. Snowe, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Collins, Mrs. 
  Clinton, Mrs. Feinstein, and Ms. Cantwell) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt abortions of 
  pregnancies in cases of rape and incest from a limitation on use of 
                      Department of Defense funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR ABORTIONS IN CASES OF 
              RAPE AND INCEST.

    Section 1093(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: `` or in a case 
in which the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest''.
                                 <all>
```
STEReO

Scalable

Traffic Management for

Emergency

Response

Operations

help responders know

more, do more, safely

Current day challenges for

emergency responders

Limited communication and

infrastructure in damaged or

remote areas

Airspace coordination and

deconfliction is highly

manual

Large amount of operations

increase airspace complexity

and the workload for

managing it

Delayed turn-around time of

remote sensing data

An airspace that supports additional and

diverse mission types requires new tools and

capabilities that ensure the safety, efficiency,

and resiliency of aerial operations

Apply NASA technologies and

partner resources to the

aviation aspects of emergency

response operations in order to:

GOAL

Reduce response times

Provide operational resiliency

to dynamic changes

Scale aircraft operations
Multidisciplinary Approach

Communications

Ad-hoc communication networks in

areas where integral comms are

degraded to support data exchange

without burdening existing networks

UTM Services

Highly automated airspace

management and standardized

platform for data exchanges that

alleviate workload associated with the

incorporation of UAS operations

Human Factors

Virtual collaboration tools to distribute

a common operating picture for all

stakeholders for strategic planning

and decision-making

Autonomy

Mission-driven capabilities, acting as

a natural extension to the emergency

response team, to support the safe

separation between vehicles

Domain Expertise & Tools

Collaboration with subject-matter

experts and stakeholders on problem

definitions, barriers and solutions to

ensure STEReO vision aligns with

needs and goals of emergency

responders

A feasibility study sponsored by NASA’s

Convergent Aeronautics Solutions Project

Fostering Innovation, Pushing Boundaries,

and Overcoming Barriers

NASA Ames Research Center

UTM Services, Autonomy, Human Factors

Joey Mercer

joey.mercer@nasa.gov

Corey Ippolito

corey.a.ippolito@nasa.gov

NASA Langley Research Center

Autonomy, Human Factors

Robert Mcswain

robert.g.mcswain@nasa.gov

NASA Glenn Research Center

Communications

Charles Sheehe

charles.j.sheehe@nasa.gov

www.nasa.gov
409A of the Code as a “short-term deferral” as described in Section 409A ofthe Code, and the provisions regarding such payment shall be interpreted accordingly.6. **Miscellaneous**. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Executive and theCompany with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior oral and writtenagreements and understandings between Executive and the Company with respect to the subject matter.This Agreement will be deemed to be made and entered into in the State of New York and will in allrespects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of New York. ThisAgreement may be amended or modified only by a formal written instrument signed by Executive and bya duly authorized representative of the Company. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of andbe binding upon the Company and its successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement may beexecuted in counterparts, both of which taken together shall constitute one instrument.**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, this Agreement has been executed and delivered as of the date first abovewritten.**HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.**         By:  /s/ Marc H. Levin    Marc H. Levin    EVP, Chief Administrative Officer & General Counsel   **EXECUTIVE**   /s/ Mike de Vere Mike de Vere
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         370,443                 370,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,029,420               1,029,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,500                  47,500
<INVENTORY>                                  1,039,441               1,039,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,431,248               2,431,248
<PP&E>                                         529,026                 529,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,278                 366,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,609,759               2,609,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,327                 910,327
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,586,982               4,586,982
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,210,958)             (3,210,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,609,759               2,609,759
<SALES>                                      2,245,816               4,513,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,245,816               4,513,178
<CGS>                                        1,707,851               3,396,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,079,539               4,188,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   634                 (3,039)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,565                  18,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,078                 309,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,078                 309,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,078                 309,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09                     .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09                     .19
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     2,044,370
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1,848,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           119,551,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                71,343,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             119,551,807
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          11,856,429
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              7,882,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             302,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             118,564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         1,885,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            1,668,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        1,668,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               1,668,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0
        
 

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-316-CV

CAROLYN W. QUIST, D.O.	APPELLANT

	V.

SPRING TYRONE AND 	APPELLEES

CHRISTOPHER TYRONE

	----------

	FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal With Prejudice”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

	The parties shall bear their own costs of appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 17, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS v. RICHARD GREENE.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### IN RE ESTATE OF PARRISH

No. 340P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 244

Petition by appellant (Lucille S. White) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
Document

                                                                                                                                                                                   Exhibit 10.2






March 26, 2020




W. Alexander Holmes,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
2828 N. Harwood Street
Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201


Re: Voluntary Salary Reduction




Dear Alex:


This letter is to confirm your voluntary base-salary reduction of 20%, from a previous annual salary of $875,000 to a new annual base salary of $700,000. You additionally agree to forfeit any salary increase previously promised to you for 2020. This reduction goes into effect on April 4, 2020, and will remain in effect until such time as the Board determines in its discretion that the effects of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus have subsided.  Any amounts relinquished pursuant to this reduction in salary may be paid in the future, as determined by the Board in its discretion.  


You hereby agree that this salary reduction is voluntarily made and does not constitute a breach of your March 2, 2018, amended and restated employment agreement (“Employment Agreement”) or a material change in the terms and conditions of your employment so as to invoke a right to severance. To the extent required, this letter constitutes an amendment to your Employment Agreement.


Please sign below indicating your agreement to the terms reflected herein.


Sincerely,


/s/ Robert Villaseñor


Robert Villaseñor,
General Counsel and Secretary


 
Agreed:






												
	/s/ W.Alexander Holmes			March 26, 2020
	W. Alexander Holmes			Date
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Belmont Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Bromwell Financial
Fund, LP, certify that (i) Amendment No. 2 to the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 of Bromwell Financial Fund, LP fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Bromwell Financial Fund, LP.


BROMWELL FINANCIAL FUND, LP
By:	Belmont Capital Management, Inc., General Partner



By:     /s/ Michael Pacult
	Michael Pacult
	Chief Executive Officer &
	Chief Financial Officer


Date:	February 5, 2008

<page>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00667-CR

Ex Parte Jose Cuenca Motta

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-4-26532-A-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 20, 2014
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEOROE ZIGICH.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Steve Valenzuela, Chief Financial Officer of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/    STEVE
VALENZUELASteve ValenzuelaVice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officerand Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)


Date: February 26, 2007