alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135428 & (34) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 135428 COA: 277027 Wayne CC: 98-013123-01 JARRED PETTY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is DENIED.

s0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Larkin, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Larkin |   |
|-----------------------|--------|

Timothy A. Larkin

*Executive Vice President,*

*Chief Financial Officer*

*And Principal Accounting Officer*

 

August 3, 2006

 

----
Order entered June 1 7 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00377 - CV YLDEFONSO M. AVILA , Appellant

V. BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE , Appellee On Appeal from the Coun ty Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 21 - 02232 - E

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s June 15, 2022 motion for extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than Ju ne 30 , 20 22.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ADELINE CONTINI.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Winston M. Talbert, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my
knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2009



/s/ Winston M. TalbertWinston M. Talbert Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Chapman *v.*Ellison.—In error.

Thursday, *January*11, 1844.

IN a suit on a promissory note, the declaration professing to set out only the legal effect of the note, omitted the words “For value received” which the note contained. *Held,*that the variance was immaterial. *Crenshaw et al.*v. *Bullitt et al.*1 Blackf. 41, and note.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3288

___________________________

David Anthony Stebbins

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Rhonda Watkins, Boone County Circuit Clerk; State of Arkansas

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: January 7, 2014

Filed: January 10, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
David Stebbins appeals from the District Court’s pre-service dismissal of his

1

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he alleged that the defendants violated his right

of access to the courts because defendant Rhonda Watkins failed to assign case

numbers to three of Stebbins’s dismissed state-court matters. Upon careful de novo

review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we

conclude that the District Court properly dismissed the complaint because (1) the

State of Arkansas may not be sued under § 1983, see Williams v. Missouri, 973 F.2d

599, 599–600 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam), and (2) Stebbins failed to state an

actionable access-to-courts claim against defendant Watkins, see Maness v. District

Court of Logan County-Northern Div., 495 F.3d 943, 944–45 (8th Cir. 2007) (per

curiam); Clowers v. Lassiter, 213 S.W.3d 6, 9 (Ark. 2005). We also conclude that the

District Court properly denied the motion for recusal, and we affirm the denial of

leave to amend because, among other reasons, the new claim that Stebbins wished to

bring did not state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. See Santiago

v. Blair, 707 F.3d 984, 991–92 (8th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________

The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

-2-
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF ACTING PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Denis Corin, the Acting Principal Accounting Officer of TapImmune Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: October 13, 2011
  By:          /s/ Denis Corin
 Denis Corin
 Chief Financial Officer, Acting Principal Accounting Officer and a director
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

CRISTOPHER RAY BUCKHAM, 

 

Movant.

No. 10-8034

(D.C. No. 2:99-CV-00189-ABJ)

ORDER

Before TACHA, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Cristopher Ray Buckham moves for authorization to file a second or

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues

that, for the same reasons discussed in Cone v. Bell, 129 S. Ct. 1769 (2009), the

district court erred in determining that the majority of the claims in his first

§ 2254 application had not been preserved in the Wyoming courts. He requests

that we authorize the district court to readjudicate the claims he presented in his

first application. We deny authorization.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), “[a] claim presented in a second or

successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a

prior application shall be dismissed.” Thus, Mr. Buckham cannot present the

claims from his first application for readjudication.

Appellate Case: 10-8034 Document: 01018417555 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Further, even if he had not previously presented his claims, he must show

that they “rel[y] on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on

collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” Id.

§ 2244(b)(2)(A). Mr. Buckham concedes that the Supreme Court did not make

Cone retroactive, but he argues that “judicial decisions operate retroactively

unless otherwise stated.” Mot. at 4. In this context, however, silence is

insufficient; “a new rule is not ‘made retroactive to cases on collateral review’

unless the Supreme Court holds it to be retroactive.” Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656,

663 (2001) (quoting § 2244(b)(2)(A)). “[T]he Supreme Court is the only entity

that can make a new rule retroactive. The new rule becomes retroactive, not by

the decisions of the lower court or by the combined action of the Supreme Court

and the lower courts, but simply by the action of the Supreme Court.” Id.

(alteration and quotation omitted).

The motion for authorization is DENIED. This denial of authorization is

not appealable and “shall not be the subject of a petition for rehearing or for a

writ of certiorari.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E).

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-8034 Document: 01018417555 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 Page: 2
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jay T. Caldwell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 11, 2007         BY: /s/ Jay T. Caldwell Jay T. Caldwell*Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer*
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000747

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NOE RAQUINIO, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 3CPC-22-0000941)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.)Upon review of the record, it appears that selfrepresented Defendant-Appellant Noe Raquinio appeals from the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit's "decision and order" purportedly entered on December 19, 2022. We conclude that the court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal because no order was entered on December 19, 2022, and the circuit court has not entered a judgment in the underlying proceeding. Hawaii Revised Statutes § 641-11 (2016); see State v. Nicol , 140 Hawai i 482, 486, 403 P.3d 259, 263 (2017).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, January 4, 2023. /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000747 04-JAN-2023 08:06 AM Dkt. 10 ODSLJ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2048

MARK BLAIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RAVENSWOOD VILLAGE HEALTH CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-1256-6)

Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Rodney Lloyd Bean, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Blair appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

Title VII action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Blair v. Ravenswood, No. CA-97-1256-6 (S.D.W. Va. June

15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2044

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2004

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be held 

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of 

9 enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa 

10 fees. 
2

•S 2044 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

3 Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of State 

4 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

5 current fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

6 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

7 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

TASHA HARRIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

MARCELO SIFUENTES RODRIGUEZ, 

in his individual capacity, a/k/a Marcel 

Sifuentes Rodriguez; CITY OF 

ALBUQUERQUE; DOES 1-5, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 13-2111 

(D.C. No. 1:13-CV-00048-BRB-ACT) 

(D. N.M.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

Before KELLY, PHILLIPS, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

This matter is before the court on the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss. The 

stipulation is granted. The captioned appeal is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42(b). 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

August 7, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 13-2111 Document: 01019472375 Date Filed: 08/07/2015 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 26, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32



                           Advertising Insertion Order
                              HTTP:WWW.EGROUPS.COM

<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales Contact:  Jill Benloff e-mail jillb@egroups.net  Phone:  (415) 546-2813 Fax: (415) 546-2801
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                             ORDER INFORMATION
Order Date:  December 6, 1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Advertiser           X.Com
                                                           Agency
Fax                  (650) 833-5470
                                                           Fax

                     394 University Avenue
Address              Palo Alto, CA  94301                  Address

Contact              Julie Anderson
                                                           Contact
Phone                (650) 833-5460
                                                           Phone
Email                ja@x.com
                                                           Email
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Start Date           12/15/99     End Date  1/15/00        Contract Length  12/15-1/15

Bill To:             [X]  Advertiser                       [ ]  Agency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                              AD PLACEMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ad Type              Position           Target             Total Clicks           Total Amount
-------              --------           ------             ------------           ------------

See Attached


                                                                            COST:  $225,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

DELIVERY: All materials must be delivered at least 4 business days in advance to
the email address allsond@egroups.net. In all correspondence, a eGroups
insertion order number and flight dates must be referenced.

This agreement is non-cancelable.

AUTHORIZED BY:                                   PHONE:            DATE:
               -----------------------------           -----------      --------

PRODUCTION CONTACT:                              PHONE:            DATE:
                    ------------------------           -----------      --------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Please return to eGroups Sales Dept.  Fax # (415) 546-2801
-------------------------------------------------------------

                             EGROUPS, INC. 350 BRANNAN SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107
EXHIBIT 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






This 17th day of March, 2011.




/s/ MICHAEL G. SANCHEZMichael G. SanchezPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ PAUL R. GARRIGUESPaul R. GarriguesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)