alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
WILLIAM E. TEAL,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0210

Opinion filed September 26, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

William E. Teal, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant General Counsel, 

Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Anthony Giaccone

, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28123

- A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 238

- CR * July 27 , 2023

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion Bailey, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# In-Space Propulsion Facility

NASA’s In-Space Propulsion Facility (ISP) is the nation’s only facility capable of testing full-scale upper-stage launch vehicles and rocket engines under simulated space conditions and conducting engine hot fire at 100,000 feet altitude conditions.  The engine or vehicle can be exposed for indefinite periods to low ambient pressures, low-background temperatures, and dynamic solar heating, simulating the environment the hardware will encounter during orbital  travel. 

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    ISP: Outside View

    ISP: Main Floor

    ISP: Vacuum Chamber

    ISP: Control Room

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of ATEL  Financial  Services,  LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund V, L.P.  (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:
August 11, 2004


/s/ Dean L. Cash
----------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.f
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Military Aircraft Parts ) ) Under Contract No. SPM4A7-10-M-8108 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59632

Mr. Robert E. Marin

President Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Edward R. Murray, Esq. Jason D. Morgan, Esq.

Trial Attorneys DLA Aviation Richmond, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthe appeal having been settled, the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 90 days ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: 25 November 2014
LYNDA T. O'SULLIVAN Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59632, Appeal ofMilitary Aircraft Parts, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: 

### NOV 2 52014

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

Blaine F. Bates

Clerk of Court

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White U.S. Courthouse

1823 Stout St., Denver, CO 80257

(303) 335-2900

January 28, 2015

TO: All Parties

RE: JD Investments of Utah, LLC v. Sophie Hanson

BAP No.: UT-14-040

Bk. No.: 12-23198

Adv. No.: 12-02219

Enclosed is a copy of the order of the Court in the captioned case. In accordance with Tenth 

Circuit BAP Local Rule 8024-3(a), the mandate will issue promptly after the time to file a 

motion for rehearing expires.

Please contact this office if you have any questions.

Blaine F. Bates 

Clerk of Court 

cc: BK - UT

BAP Appeal No. 14-40 Docket No. 23-1 Filed: 01/28/2015 Page: 1 of 1
No. 87-5677.

#### Harris *v.*Reed, Warden, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I, Daniel Medina, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form  10-KSB of  Colorado  Community
Broadcasting, Inc..;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of April 30, 2003; and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 19, 2004


/s/Daniel Medina
-----------------------
Daniel Medina
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 12, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL JAMES MARZONIE, JR., et

al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees, 

v. 

BRAUCH ENTERPRISES II, et al.,

 Defendants - Appellants. 

 

No. 10-1038

 (D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00021-ZLW)

ORDER

In a March 1, 2010 Show Cause Order, Appellants-Defendants were directed to file

within 30 days of the date on the show cause order, i.e., by March 31, 2010, a jurisdictional

memorandum brief addressing the appellate jurisdictional issue of whether the district court’s

January 19, 2010 Order remanding the case to state court was reviewable on appeal. In this

March 1, 2010 Show Cause Order, Appellant-Defendant Brauch Enterprises II was directed

to secure counsel and to have that counsel enter an appearance on its behalf in this court

within 30 days of the date on the show cause order, i.e., by March 31, 2010. In a March 12,

2010 Order, Appellants-Defendants were reminded that their responses to the March 1, 2010

Show Cause Order were due by March 31, 2010. Appellants-Defendants failed to comply.

Appellate Case: 10-1038 Document: 01018400581 Date Filed: 04/12/2010 Page: 1 
2

Moreover, in a February 11, 2010 letter from the Clerk of the court, AppellantsDefendants were directed to pay the full filing and docket fees in the district court or file in

this court an application for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees within

40 days of the date on the letter, i.e. by March 23, 2010. Appellants-Defendants failed to

comply.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. See 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 42.1. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Case: 10-1038 Document: 01018400581 Date Filed: 04/12/2010 Page: 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 List of Subsidiaries JurisdictionSubsidiary
    
    of Organization
    
    OwnershipBeijing SINA Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    99.35
    %Rich Sight Investment Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    100
    %SINA.com Online
    
    United States of America
    
    
    100
    %Beijing SINA Internet Technology Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %Shanghai SINA Online Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %SINA.com (Hong Kong) Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    100
    %Magic King Assets Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100
    %Memestar Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100
    %Shanghai SINA Information Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %Shanghai SINA Technology Service Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %Star-Village.com (Beijing) Internet Technology Limited
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %Shanghai NC-SINA Information Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    51
    %Beijing New Media Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %
VERNON ROBINSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4552

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed June 15, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

.

Vernon Robinson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### CHRISTINE O’BISO v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF LINCOLN PARK, MORRIS COUNTY.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID USA-2010-0024]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: The Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army is deleting a systems of record 
notice from its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
December 3, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by any of the following 
methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department of the Army, Privacy 
Office, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, 7701 
Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Suite 144, Alexandria, VA 22325-3905, 
Mr. Leroy Jones at (703) 428-6185.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Army systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT address above.
    The Department of the Army proposes to delete one system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: October 26, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion

A0608-10 CFSC
    Child Development Services (CDS) (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10002).

Reason:
    The Child Development Services (CDS) is covered under system of 
records notice A0215 FMWRC, General Morale, Welfare, Recreation and 
Entertainment Records (July 7, 2008, 73 FR 38420); therefore the notice 
can be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2010-27712 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                                                   March 19,1999




A. F. Harris:

   In the event your employment is terminated, within five years from the date
of this letter, for reasons other than malfeasance, theft, or immorality, you
will be provided an amount of severance pay equal to two years' pay. The
severance pay shall equal the greater of the average of the prior two years'
base pay and actual bonus, or two times the salary and target bonus for the year
in which the termination occurs. Any severance pay is conditional upon signing
a release and waiver of all claims against the Kellogg Company and its
subsidiaries.



                                                  /s/ C.M. Gutierrez
                                                      C.M. Gutierrez
                                                      President & COO

Acknowledged:


Alan F. Harris

March 19, 1999
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Seth A. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Newtek Business Services, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Newtek Business Services, Inc. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any chance in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2008
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

December 01, 2015

Hon. Anne Lorentzen

District Clerk 901 Leopard St., Suite 313 Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00358

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 13

- 714

- 4 Style: THE STATE OF TEXAS v. BONNIE DOWNS

T he judgment of the trial court was DISMISSED

- WANT OF JURISDICTION by this Court

on the 17 th day of September, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate co urt of the receipt of the mandate. Please review the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowl edgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Mark Skurka (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Douglas K. Norman (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. David Jakubowski (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Travis W. Berry (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13

- 13

- 00358

- CR this

________ day of _________________, 201 5

. District/County Clerk,

By :____________________________