alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2149

      To provide customs services after hours at certain airports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2004

   Mr. Coleman (for himself and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide customs services after hours at certain airports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CUSTOMS SERVICES.

    Section 13031(e)(1) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(e)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) Notwithstanding section 451 of the 
        Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1451) or any other provision of 
        law (other than paragraph (2)),'' and inserting:
            ``(1) In general.--
                    ``(A) Scheduled flights.--Notwithstanding section 
                451 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1451) or any 
                other provision of law (other than subparagraph (B) and 
                paragraph (2)),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) After hours service.--If an air carrier (as 
                defined in section 40102(2) of title 49, United States 
                Code) specifically requests that customs services for 
                passengers and their baggage be provided after normal 
                operating hours at a customs serviced airport and 
                overtime funds for those services are not available, 
                the appropriate customs officer shall assign sufficient 
                customs employees (if available) to perform any such 
                services, which could lawfully be performed during 
                regular hours of operation, and any overtime fees 
                incurred in connection with such service shall be paid 
                by the air carrier.''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2136

_____________________________

CHARLES OSBORN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

November 21, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Charles Osborn, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EVELYN SALAS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE,

 Defendant - Appellee. 

 No. 10-2003

 (D.C. No. 1:09-CV-00027-WJ/RHS)

ORDER

In accordance with 10th Cir. R. 33.1 and upon consideration of the stipulation of

the parties to voluntarily dismiss the captioned appeal, this appeal is dismissed. See Fed.

R. App. P. 42(b).

Each party will bear their own costs on appeal. A copy of this order will stand as

the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2003 Document: 01018377362 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 1
#### STATE v. RIDGILL

No. 443P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 707

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 2001.
#### DWIGHT VAN HORN v. CITY OF TRENTON.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 159 *N. J. Super.*115)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IVAN L. MENDEZ, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

THE NATIONAL RAILROADS OF

MEXICO, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-2145

 (D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01222-RB-DJS)

ORDER

Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by the court in the order dated

July 7, 2010; accordingly, this appeal is dismiss for failure to prosecute. See 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 42.1. 

A copy of this order shall stand as the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2145 Document: 01018466015 Date Filed: 07/28/2010 Page: 1
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert Selvi, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.2, of SonicWALL, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  (c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 1, 2005    /s/ ROBERT SELVI   Robert Selvi Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,846,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,000
<INVENTORY>                                 37,931,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,701,406
<PP&E>                                      28,407,966
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,413,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,390,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,185,926
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,320
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,020,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,390,176
<SALES>                                     68,288,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,288,862
<CGS>                                       47,872,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,923,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (76,923)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,569,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,049,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,520,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,520,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.333-91369) of Aether Systems, Inc. ("the Company") pertaining to the
Company's 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company's Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-52220) pertaining to the Company's 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the
Company's Registration Statement (Form S-8 No 333-52222) pertaining to the
Company's Acquisitions Incentive Plan, the Company's Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No 333-48898) pertaining to 1,143,949 shares of the Company's common
stock, the Company's Registration Statement (Form S-3 No 333-56154) pertaining
to 3,023,560 shares of the Company's common stock, the Company's Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No 333-64264) pertaining to 245,973 shares of the Company's
common stock and the Company's Registration Statement (Form S-3 No 333-74428)
pertaining to 752,483 shares of the Company's common stock, of our report with
respect to the financial statements of Sila Communications Limited dated
February 5, 2002 included in the Company's Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.

                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

London, England
April 1, 2002











                                  END OF FILING
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

STAN LEE MEDIA, INC., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-1348

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-02663-WJM-KMT)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 28, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-1348 Document: 01019422252 Date Filed: 04/28/2015 Page: 1
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Space STEM Forum

Forward to the Moon Initiative 

Beverly Girten, Ph.D.

December, 2018
Forward to the Moon, Not Just Returning to the Moon 

How is moon exploration today different from what 

the U.S. did 50 years ago? 

When discussing U.S. return to the moon the Jim 

Bridenstine, NASA Administrator has emphasized:

We don’t use the word return — we are 

moving forward to the moon — sustainably

September 27, 2018

Bridenstine would like every man, women and 

child in America to understand the difference. 

THE NEXT GIANT LEAP 
Moving Forward to the Moon Initiative

Celebrating Apollo and Moving Forward to the Moon and on to Mars

Learning Module Components

K-6: Moving Forward to the Moon activity pad and NPS Nightsky Insert

7-9: Lesson plans/activities for class, museums, youth organizations

9-12, Teachers, Parents: Toolkit folder with age specific games & resources

Topics Covered in Learning Modules

Apollo Historic Moon2Mars (M2M) 

Apollo 8 Earthrise SLS and Orion

Apollo 11 1st manned landing Lunar Gateway

Eagle, LEM, Tranquility Base Sustainability and M2M
Moving Forward to the Moon initiative

Celebrating Apollo and Moving Forward to the Moon and on to Mars with NASA 

Potential uses of Moving Forward to the Moon material:

- Use with learning modules in schools and at Anniversary events (Jamboree)

- Send your name to the Moon with NASA (boarding pass, microchip)
Forward to the Moon, 

sustainably, and on to Mars

Gateway: Lunar Orbiting Platform-Gateway The lunar Gateway will act as a shortcut to Mars

THE NEXT GIANT LEAP
|    |                                                                                                             |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (“Rainmaker”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                            |
| /s/    MICHAEL SILTON          |
| Michael SiltonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer) |
FINAL

 

 NASA Advisory Council Ad Hoc Task Force on

 Science, Technology, Engineering

 and Mathematics (STEM) Education

AGENDA

November 13, 2017

11:30 noon – 3:30 pm

NASA Headquarters (Virtual)

Webex and Call In Information Below

11:30 Open Meeting B. Girten

11:35 Opening Remarks by Chair A. Kennedy

11:45 Evaluation R. Lasalvia

12:15 Update on Education Business Service Assessment (BSA) & Transition M. Kincaid

12:45 Discuss Findings and Recommendations Members

 

1:15 Break All

1:20 Finalize Findings and Recommendations Members

2:25 Close Public Meeting B. Girten

2:30 Annual Training Members

3:30 End Training Members 

844–467–6272 or toll access number 720–259–6462, and then the participant passcode: 634012 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx the link is https://nasa.webex.com/, the meeting number is 998 557 944 and the password is Education1!
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credit  Fund IiI,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period  ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Thomas J. Riha,
Senior  Vice-President  and Chief Financial  Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,
general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Melanie R. Wenk
------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 9, 2009
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700146

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ZACHARY N. PROTO

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2d Battalion, 2d Marine 

Regiment, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel

Winston G. McMillan, USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 8 August 2017

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL,

1 FULTON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

 For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court 

 

1 Former Senior Judge Campbell took final action in this case prior to detaching 

from the court.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

# **CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

##### **PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

 

I, John W. Feray, Chief Financial Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 9, 2005 |                           |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                  | /s/ John W. Feray              |   |
|                  | John W. Feray                  |   |
|                  | Chief Accounting Officer       |   |
|                  | (principal accounting officer) |   |

 

1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6590
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVIN LAMONT SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-17-F) Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davin Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Cortes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Davin Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Smith , No. CR-02-17-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ESTELLE V. CICCONE v. BOARD OF REVIEW.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,459
<PP&E>                                       5,220,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,244,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,244,972
<SALES>                                        197,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,061
<CGS>                                          120,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (76,864)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,864)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 24, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: MICHAEL J. LAWRENCE,

 Petitioner. 

No. 10-6114

(D.C. No. 5:10-CV-00390-M)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-6114 Document: 01018446602 Date Filed: 06/24/2010 Page: 1
#### ALOIS HAUEIS, ET AL. v. THE BOROUGH OF FAR HILLS, ET AL.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied..