alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          70,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,679,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (433,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,395,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,785,147
<PP&E>                                       4,012,341
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,248,710)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,233,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,057,728
<BONDS>                                      3,314,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,658,559
<OTHER-SE>                                       (647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,233,035
<SALES>                                      9,294,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,294,762
<CGS>                                        5,146,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,401,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             303,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,540,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (71,429)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,469,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,469,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### David Watt *v.*W. H. Whitlow.

Slander — Words Spoken After Commencement of Suit — Instructions.

In this action for slander words spoken after the commencement of suit, and which were then actionable, were stated in an amended petition, and the speaking of these w'ords, as well as those spoken before the action was brought, were proven on the trial. *Held,*that the court erred in instructing the jury “that if they believed from the evidence that the defendant spoke the words charged in the amended petition they should find for the plaintiff.”

APPEAL FROM MONROE CIRCUIT COURT.

June 29, 1866.

.Opinion of the Court by

Judge Marshall:

In this action for slander words spoken after the commencement of the suit, and which were themselves actionable, are stated in *214an amended petition, and the speaking of these words, as -well as of those spoken before the action was brought, was proved on the trial.

The court instructed the jury that if they believed from the evidence that the defendant spoke the words charged in the petition or amended petition, or the words in substance, they ought to find for the plaintiff such damages as under all the circumstances they thought proper, not exceeding the sum claimed in the petition.

In a second instruction the jury were told that words uttered after the commencement, of the action could only be considered by them in reference to the malice.

The first instruction was erroneous because it told the jury to find damages for words spoken after the commencement of the action, and the second being *irreconcilable*to it, and irreconcilable, tended rather to confuse than to enlighten the jury. The first instruction should not have included “words spoken after the suit was brought,” and as decided in Setton *v.*Young, 2 Metc. 561, 562, the jury should have been told explicitly that they werejnot to increase the damages on account of such words.

For the error in the instructions the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial in conformity with this opinion. -
CAUSE NO. IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
EX PARTE JOSE ARTURO VERGARA Applicant. '§ § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
D 

## RECEiVEDiN 406thJUDICIAL

### ~TOFCRIMINALAPPEALS WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS 

## fEB 27

## 2015 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW JOSE ARTURO VERGARA, Relator, pro se• inthe above styledand numbered cause of action and files this ORIGINAL APPLICATION for WRIT of MANDAMUS pursuant to Article 11.07 Section 3(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, andwould show the Court the following:
1. Jose Arturo Vergara, TDCJ #1773208, incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and is appearing pro:se. 2. Relator filed an application for writ of habeas corpus under trial court cause no. 20llCR000560 D4 (A), pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 11.07 on the date of April 08, 2014. This habeas application is tobe governed by the Rules as found in the statute. 3. The Webb County District Clerkhas failed to forward the wirt application, and any**re~omendations** made by the State and/or Trial Court, to the Court of Criminal Appeals, after the thirty five (35) days.allottedby statute.

. '•' . . 4. See Texas Code Criminal'Procedure Art. 11.07 Sec. 3(c) "the clerkshall immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of the**Appli~** cation, any answers filed, and a certificate reciting the**d~te** upon which that finding was made." Thereby/ the Clerk is inviolation. 5. Relator has no adequate remedy at law, and is seeking this Court issuance '•· of a writ of mandamus tocompel the Clerk to'send the documents.**~ ~RAYER**  ._Relator seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the District ClerkofWebb County, Texas to forward the

Date: February 24,2015 Application to this Court.

## spectfu~y Submitted,

## ---~u~773208

# ~ CJ Michael Unit 2664 FM TN. Colony, TX 75886 2954
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 27, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Aslin Opportunity Fund BK, LP, Cape Haze, Florida,*                     to acquire 46.7 percent of the voting shares of Aslin Group, Inc., parent of Alterra Bank, both in Overland Park, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 29, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-27729 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Matthew Medeiros, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SonicWALL, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date:May 16, 2005 /s/  Matthew Medeiros   **Matthew Medeiros** **President and Chief Executive Officer**
#### M. L. Lair’s Exr. et al. *v.*M. D. Whitaker et al.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Secret Trust — Money Bona Fide Paid by Trustee.

Where it is adjudged that land is held by one in secret trust for another, the trustee may assert claim to the extent of money shown to-have been *tona fide*paid or advanced out of his own means or that he is-honestly bound to pay.

APPEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 29, 1867.

Opinion of ti-ie Court by

Judge Robertson :

It would be unprofitable to state all the minute facts conducing to show collusion, and to make an elaborate argument to prove that they sufficiently lead to the deduction that Thomas J. Whitaker holds the legal title to all the lands of his brother, W. F. Whitaker, in secret trust for his use and benefit. And we will only say> therefore, that we are satisfied with the judicial conclusion that all those lands are justly liable to the creditors of W. F. Whitaker, and ought to be subjected in those consolidated cases to the judgments of the appellants against W. F. Whitaker, but he is entitled to a credit for usury as charged and proved, the precise extent of which should be ascertained on the return of the case to the Circuit Court.

Lancaster, as garnishee, having derived any indebtedness to W. F. Whitaker, the simple fact that his deposition proves that he borrowed money from M. Whitaker could not entitle the appellants to a judgment against him without making her a party and properly litigating with her and Lancaster according to the 24Jth and 248th sections of the Code.

*447Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and' the cause remanded for further proceedings — and amendments if full and final justice requires any amended pleadings — not involving the question of fraud. Any person claiming a lien may be made a party, and Thos. Whitaker may assert claim to the extent of any money which he shows to have been *tona fide*paid or advanced out of his own means or that he is honestly bound to pay for W. F. Whitaker — on account of any of the lands adjudged to have been fraudulently conveyed-to him for W. F. Whitaker’s use. For any amount which may prove that he, in good faith, advanced with his own ■means, he may be entitled with other creditors to a *pro rata*distribution.
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rent-Way, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2004, (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                          |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated:         May 7, 2004                      /s/William E. Morgenstern |  | 
|                                                                         
|William E. Morgenstern,                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer                                                  
|                                                                         
|Dated:         May 7, 2004                      /s/William A. McDonnell   |  | 
|                                                                         
|William A. McDonnell,                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer                                                  

This certification is being furnished
solely to accompany this Form-10Q pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such
incorporation is expressly referenced herein.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1839

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 

2002. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2003

Mr. SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment 

Compensation Act of 2002.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workers Assistance 

5 Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY EXTENDED UNEM7 PLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT OF 2002. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 208 of the Temporary Ex9 tended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (Public 

10 Law 107–147; 116 Stat. 30), as amended by Public Law 
2

•S 1839 IS 

1 108–1 (117 Stat. 3) and Public Law 108–26 (117 Stat. 

2 751), is amended—

3 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘December 

4 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘December 

6 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; 

7 (3) in subsection (b)(2)—

8 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘DECEM9 BER 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘JUNE 30, 2004’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2003’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; and 

13 (4) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘March 31, 

14 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2004’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact17 ment of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Com18 pensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–147; 116 Stat. 

19 21).

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 15, 2016

Order 

April 15, 2016

152758(35)

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 152758

COA: 322108

Saginaw CC: 2013-020416-NF

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Insurance Institute of Michigan to 

participate as amicus curiae and file an amicus brief in support of the application for 

leave to appeal is GRANTED. An amicus brief will be accepted for filing if submitted 

on or before April 26, 2016.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128144 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. WAYNE OAKLAND CO NTRACTING, Stephen J. Markman, INC., a Michigan Corporation, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128144 COA: 248387 Wayne CC: 00-024745-CZ CITY OF GARDEN CITY, a Municipal Corporation and GARDEN CITY DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Transition Report of SINA
CORPORATION (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the transition period from July
1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Mao, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
2002 and results of operations of the Company for the transition period from
July 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002.

Date:  April 30, 2003

|    |  |                                                
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Daniel Mao                                 
|    |  |                                                
|    |  | Daniel Mao
Chief Executive Officer and Director





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Transition Report of SINA
CORPORATION (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the transition period from July
1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Chao, Chief Financial
Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
2002 and results of operations of the Company for the transition period from
July 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002.

Date:  April 30, 2003

|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Charles Chao                                                 
|    |  |                                                                  
|    |  | Charles Chao
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATON OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, the (“Report”),I, Catherine M. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Catherine M. Davidson


Catherine M. Davidson


Principal Financial Officer








August 15, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.