1336 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices 

petitioner was able to file its request for review on 

the next business day, Monday, June 1, 2009. 

1Those companies are: Far Eastern Industries, 

Ltd., (Shanghai) and Far Eastern Polychem 

Industries; Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; 

Cixi Sansheng Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; Cixi Santai 

Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; Cixi Waysun Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Best Chemical Fibre Co., 

Ltd.; Hangzhou Hanbang Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Huachuang Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Sanxin 

Paper Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Taifu Textile Fiber Co., 

Ltd.; Jiaxing Fuda Chemical Fibre Factory; Nantong 

Loulai Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; Nanyang Textile 

Co., Ltd.; Suzhou PolyFiber Co., Ltd.; Xiamen 

Xianglu Chemical Fiber Co.; Zhaoqing Tifo New 

Fiber Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Anshun Pettechs Fibre Co., 

Ltd.; Zhejiang Waysun Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; 

Dragon Max Trading Development; Xiake Color 

Spinning Co., Ltd.; Jiangyin Hailun Chemical Fiber 

Co., Ltd.; Hyosung Singapore PTE Ltd.; Jiangyin 

Changlong Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; Ma Ha 

Company, Ltd.; Jiangyin Huahong Chemical Fiber 

Co., Ltd.; Jiangyin Mighty Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; 

and Huvis Sichuan. 

2 DAK Americas LLC and Nan Ya Plastics 

Corporation America. 

Department published a notice of 

initiation of this administrative review, 

covering the period of May 1, 2008 to 

April 30, 2009. The respondent is Yieh 

Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 

30052 (June 24, 2009). The current 

deadline for the preliminary results of 

this review is January 31, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. However, 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order for which 

a review is requested. 

The Department finds it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of this review within the original 

time frame because we require 

additional time to obtain information 

from the respondent and to analyze 

various complicated issues involving, 

for example, respondent’s reporting of 

product characteristics and its cost 

allocation methodologies. Accordingly, 

the Department is extending the time 

limit for completion of the preliminary 

results of this administrative review 

until no later than May 31, 2010, which 

is 365 days from the last day of the 

anniversary month. As this date falls on 

a federal holiday, the preliminary 

results are due June 1, 2010. See Notice 

of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to 

the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). We intend to 

issue the final results no later than 120 

days after publication of the preliminary 

results notice. 

This extension is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 5, 2010. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–278 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–905] 

First Administrative Review of Certain 

Polyester Staple Fiber From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 7, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

first administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

polyester staple fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results, 74 FR 32125 (July 7, 2009) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The period of 

review (‘‘POR’’) is from December 26, 

2006, through May 31, 2008, for 27 

companies.1

We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Based upon our 

analysis of the comments and 

information received, we made changes 

to the dumping margin calculations for 

the final results. See Memorandum to 

the File from Emeka Chukwudebe, Case 

Analyst, through Alex Villanueva, 

Program Manager, Final Results 

Analysis for Ningbo Dafa Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Dafa’’) 

(December 11, 2009); and Memorandum 

to the File from Emeka Chukwudebe, 

Case Analyst, through Alex Villanueva, 

Program Manager, Final Results 

Analysis for Cixi Santai Chemical Fiber 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Santai’’) (December 11, 2009). 

The final dumping margins are listed 

below in the section entitled ‘‘Final 

Results of Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emeka Chukwudebe (Ningbo Dafa), or 

Alexis Polovina (Santai) AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0219 and (202) 

482–3927, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

As noted above, on July 7, 2009, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review 

where we also extended the deadline for 

the final results by 60 days. See 

Preliminary Results. On July 27, 2009, 

Ningbo Dafa submitted additional 

surrogate value information. On October 

20, 2009, Petitioners 2 and Respondents 

submitted case briefs. On October 26, 

2009, Petitioners and Respondents 

submitted rebuttal briefs. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this 

proceeding is synthetic staple fibers, not 

carded, combed or otherwise processed 

for spinning, of polyesters measuring 

3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more 

in diameter. This merchandise is cut to 

lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) 

to five inches (127 mm). The subject 

merchandise may be coated, usually 

with silicon or other finish, or not 

coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing 

in sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets, 

comforters, cushions, pillows, and 

furniture. 

The following products are excluded 

from the scope: (1) PSF of less than 3.3 

decitex (less than 3 denier) currently 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheading 5503.20.0025 

and known to the industry as PSF for 

spinning and generally used in woven 

and knit applications to produce textile 

and apparel products; (2) PSF of 10 to 

18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 

8 inches and that are generally used in 

the manufacture of carpeting; and (3) 

low-melt PSF defined as a bi-component 

fiber with an outer, non-polyester 

sheath that melts at a significantly lower 

temperature than its inner polyester 

core (classified at HTSUS 

5503.20.0015). 

Certain PSF is classifiable under the 

HTSUS subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices 1337 

3Between August 31, 2009, and September 4, 

2009, we conducted a verification of Santai. See 

‘‘Memorandum to the File through Alex Villanueva, 

Program Manager, Office 9, from Alexis Polovina, 

Case Analyst, Office 9, and Emeka Chukwudebe, 

Case Analyst, Office 9, re: Verification of the Sales 

and Processing Response of Cixi Santai Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Administrative 

Review of Certain Polyester from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated October 7, 2009. Between 

September 5, 2009, and September 11, 2009, we 

conducted a verification of Ningbo Dafa. See 

‘‘Memorandum to the File through Alex Villanueva, 

Program Manager, Office 9, from Emeka 

Chukwudebe, Case Analyst, Office 9, and Alexis 

Polovina, Case Analyst, Office 9, re: Verification of 

the Sales and Factors Response of Ningbo Dafa 

Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Dafa’’) in the 

Antidumping First Administrative Review of 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘China’’),’’ dated 

October 8, 2009. 

5503.20.0065. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under the orders is dispositive. 

Verification 

Pursuant to section 351.307(b)(iv) of 

the Department’s regulations, we 

conducted verifications of respondents’ 

questionnaire responses.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to these 

reviews are addressed in the ‘‘First 

Antidumping Administrative Review of 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the 

People’s Republic of China: Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results,’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 

the issues which parties raised and to 

which we respond in the Decision 

Memo is attached to this notice as an 

Appendix. The Decision Memo is a 

public document and is on file in the 

Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Main 

Commerce Building, Room 1117, and is 

accessible on the Department’s Web site 

at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

memorandum are identical in content. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that the following 

companies met the criteria for separate 

rate status: Far Eastern Industries, Ltd., 

(Shanghai) and Far Eastern Polychem 

Industries; Cixi Sansheng Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd.; Cixi Waysun Chemical 

Fiber Co. Ltd., Hangzhou Best Chemical 

Fibre Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Hanbang 

Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou 

Huachuang Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Sanxin 

Paper Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Taifu Textile 

Fiber Co., Ltd.; Jiaxing Fuda Chemical 

Fibre Factory; Nantong Loulai Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd.; Nanyang Textile Co., 

Ltd.; Xiamen Xianglu Chemical Fiber 

Co.; Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber Co., Ltd.; 

Zhejiang Anshun Pettechs Fibre Co., 

Ltd.; and Zhejiang Waysun Chemical 

Fiber Co., Ltd. We received no 

comments on the Department’s 

preliminary finding that these 

companies qualify for a separate rate. 

Therefore, for the final results, these 

companies will continue to receive the 

separate rate. 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that the following 10 companies did not 

submit either a separate-rate application 

or certification: Dragon Max Trading 

Development; Xiake Color Spinning Co., 

Ltd.; Jiangyin Hailun Chemical Fiber 

Co., Ltd.; Hyosung Singapore PTE Ltd.; 

Jiangyin Changlong Chemical Fiber Co., 

Ltd.; Ma Ha Company, Ltd.; Jiangyin 

Huahong Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.; 

Jiangyin Mighty Chemical Fiber Co., 

Ltd.; Huvis Sichuan; and Suzhou 

PolyFiber Co., Ltd. We received no 

comments on the Department’s 

preliminary finding that these 10 

companies do not qualify for a separate 

rate. Therefore, for the final results, 

these companies will remain part of the 

PRC-wide entity and subject to the PRCwide entity rate. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record as 

well as comments received from parties 

regarding our Preliminary Results, we 

have made revisions to the margin 

calculation for Ningbo Dafa and Santai 

in the final results. Specifically, we 

have updated the surrogate value for 

steam coal. See Decision Memo at 

Comment 1a. For all changes to the 

calculations of Ningbo Dafa and Santai, 

see the Decision Memo and company 

specific analysis memoranda. 

Final Results of Review 

The weighted-average dumping 

margins for the POR are as follows: 

CERTAIN POLYESTER STAPLE FIBER FROM THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Manufacturer/exporter Weighted average 

margin (percent) 

Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 0.00 

Cixi Santai Chemical Fiber Co ...................................................................................................................................................... * 0.02 

Far Eastern Polychem Industries .................................................................................................................................................. 4.44 

Cixi Sansheng Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 4.44 

Cixi Waysun Chemical Fiber Co. Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 4.44 

Hangzhou Best Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Hangzhou Hanbang Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Hangzhou Huachuang Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Hangzhou Sanxin Paper Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 4.44 

Hangzhou Taifu Textile Fiber Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Jiaxing Fuda Chemical Fibre Factory ............................................................................................................................................ 4.44 

Nantong Loulai Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Nanyang Textile Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Xiamen Xianglu Chemical Fiber Co .............................................................................................................................................. 4.44 

Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 4.44 

Zhejiang Anshun Pettechs Fibre Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

Zhejiang Waysun Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... 4.44 

PRC-Wide Rate ............................................................................................................................................................................. 44.30 

* De minimis. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1338 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of these final results, 

the Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by these 

reviews. The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of the 

final results of this review. Furthermore, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries 

for all companies at the companyspecific rate required at the time of 

entry. In accordance with 751(a)(2)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘Act’’) and 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), we calculated 

importer (or customer)-specific 

assessment rates for the merchandise 

subject to this review. Where the 

respondent has reported reliable entered 

values, we calculated importer (or 

customer)-specific ad valorem rates by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to each 

importer (or customer) and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of the 

sales to each importer (or customer). See 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an 

importer (or customer)-specific ad 

valorem rate is greater than de minimis, 

we will apply the assessment rate to the 

entered value of the importers’/ 

customers’ entries during the POR. Id. 

For the companies receiving a 

separate rate that were not selected for 

individual review, the assessment rate 

will be based on the rate from the 

investigation pursuant to section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 

percent, no cash deposit will be 

required for that company); (2) for 

previously investigated PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 44.30 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 4, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I—Decision Memorandum 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Surrogate Values. 

A. Steam Coal. 

B. Labor. 

Comment 2: Separate Rate. 

Comment 3: Liquidation of Certain Entries. 

Company-Specific Issues 

Ningbo Dafa 

Comment 4: Negotiation Files for Purchases 

of Bottle Flakes and Sales of PSF. 

Comment 5: Invoice Numbering System. 

Jianxin Fuda Chemical Fibre Factory. 

Comment 6: Correction of Name in Federal 

Register Notice. 

[FR Doc. 2010–275 Filed 1–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Telecommunications and 

Information Administration 

Online Safety and Technology Working 

Group Meeting 

AGENCY: National Telecommunications 

and Information Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces a 

public meeting of the Online Safety and 

Technology Working Group (OSTWG). 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

February 4, 2010, from 8:40 a.m. to 5:00 

p.m., Eastern Standard Time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the United States Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, 

NW, Room 4830, Washington, DC 

20230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe 

Gattuso at (202) 482–0977 or 

jgattuso@ntia.doc.gov; and/or visit 

NTIA’s web site at www.ntia.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: NTIA established the 

OSTWG pursuant to Section 214 of the 

Protecting Children in the 21st Century 

Act (Act). The OSTWG is composed of 

representatives of relevant sectors of the 

business community, public interest 

groups, and other appropriate groups 

and Federal agencies. The members 

were selected for their expertise and 

experience in online safety issues, as 

well as their ability to represent the 

views of the various industry 

stakeholders. 

According to the Act, the OSTWG is 

tasked with evaluating industry efforts 

to promote a safe online environment 

for children. The Act requires the 

OSTWG to report its findings and 

recommendations to the Assistant 

Secretary for Communications and 

Information and to Congress within one 

(1) year after its first meeting. 

Matters to Be Considered: The 

OSTWG will hear presentations and 

have discussions on online safety and 

technology, with an emphasis on issues 

relevant to the work of the 

subcommittees on data retention and 

child pornography reporting. 

Time and Date: The meeting will be 

held on February 4, 2010, from 8:40 a.m. 

to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time. 

The times and the agenda topics are 

subject to change. The meeting may be 

webcast. Please refer to NTIA’s web site, 

http://www.ntia.doc.gov, for the most 

up-to-date meeting agenda and webcast 

information. 

Place: The meeting will be held at the 

United States Department of Commerce, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES