alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1653

To ensure that recreational benefits are given the same priority as hurricane 

and storm damage reduction benefits and environmental restoration benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To ensure that recreational benefits are given the same priority as hurricane and storm damage reduction benefits 

and environmental restoration benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Beach Recre5 ation and Economic Benefits Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GOALS TO BE ADDRESSED IN PLANNING OF WATER 

7 RESOURCE PROJECTS. 

8 Section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act 

9 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is amended to read as follows: 
2

•S 1653 IS 

1 ‘‘SEC. 904. GOALS TO BE ADDRESSED IN PLANNING OF 

2 WATER RESOURCE PROJECTS. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the goals of enhancing 

4 national economic development, the quality of the total en5 vironment, the well-being of the people of the United 

6 States, the prevention of loss of life, and the preservation 

7 of cultural and historical values shall be addressed in the 

8 formulation and evaluation of water resources projects to 

9 be carried out by the Secretary. 

10 ‘‘(b) DISPLAY OF ASSOCIATED BENEFITS AND

11 COSTS.—The quantifiable and unquantifiable costs and 

12 benefits associated with the goals relating to water re13 sources projects described in subsection (a) shall be dis14 played in any analysis of the costs and benefits of those 

15 projects.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. GIVING RECREATIONAL BENEFITS THE SAME STA17 TUS AS OTHER BEACH RESTORATION BENE18 FITS. 

19 Subsection (e)(2)(B) of the first section of the Act 

20 of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e(e)(2)(B)), is amend21 ed by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following: 

22 ‘‘(ii) CONSIDERATIONS; PROCE23 DURES.—In making recommendations re24 lating to shore protection projects under 

25 clause (i), the Secretary shall—
3

•S 1653 IS 

1 ‘‘(I) consider the economic and 

2 ecological benefits of the shore protec3 tion projects; and 

4 ‘‘(II) develop and implement pro5 cedures for the determination of na6 tional economic benefits that treat 

7 benefits provided for recreation, hurri8 cane and storm damage reduction, 

9 and environmental restoration equal10 ly.’’.

Æ
# International Women’s Day

More than 650 women gathered on Lab for the annual International Women’s Day photo, participating in a generational time-lapse showing the growth of female employees on Lab through the decades – starting with the longest tenured NASA employee, and ending with the Lab’s first female Director.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/jpl-employees/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASA/JPL-CaltechSize8256x5504pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31014

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MITCHELL MINOR, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CR-6-ALL)

- - - - - - - - - -

November 25, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Mitchell Minor, Jr., appeals his

conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a

firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that

the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. 

Minor has not, however, established that the district court

clearly erred in finding that police officers saw him carrying a

cloth bag out of which protruded the butt of a revolver and that

he abandoned the bag containing the revolver while being pursued
by the police; thus, the district court did not err in denying

Minor’s motion to suppress. See California v. Hodari D., 499

U.S. 621, 625-26 (1991).

Minor next argues that counsel was ineffective in agreeing

with the government to stipulate to the fact that Minor had a

prior felony conviction. Although such claims are not ordinarily

reviewed on direct appeal, the district court record in the

instant case is sufficient to dispose of this claim. See United

States v. Gibson, 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). Minor has

failed to demonstrate that counsel performed deficiently or

prejudicially in agreeing to the stipulation, so his

ineffectiveness claim is without merit. See Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 697 (1984). 

Minor additionally challenges the sufficiency of the

evidence to support his conviction, given the fact that the

revolver was not found on his person at the time of his arrest. 

His claim is without merit because any reasonable jury could have

found beyond a reasonable doubt that he possessed, then

abandoned, the revolver. See United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d

258, 265 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 702 (1998);

see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-19 (1979). 

Finally, Minor contends that the district court erred in

refusing to award him a downward adjustment for acceptance of

responsibility. Minor did not plead guilty but put the

government to its burden of proof at trial and has done nothing

since his conviction to demonstrate that he has accepted

responsibility for his crime. Consequently, the district court
committed no error in concluding that Minor did not merit a

downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and thus

declining to award one. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (nn.1 &

2).

AFFIRMED.
NASA Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs 

Organizational Chart

Associate Administrator

Deputy Associate Administrators 

Center Legislative 

Liaisons

Legislative Liaison 

Division

Legislative Reference 

and Analysis Division

Outreach and 

Intergovernmental 

Affairs Division)

As of 2/17/21
#### The State, on the Relation of Vance, County Treasurer, &c., *v.*Lahue and Others.—In error.

*Friday, January*2, 1846.

IN a suit by the state, on the relation of a county treasurer, on a collector’s bond, the relator is not liable for costs. R. S. 1843, p. *696.*—Jones *et al.*v. *The State,*5 Blackf. 141.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10L
STATE OF TENNESSEE
COUNTY OF SHELBY


                      MODIFICATION TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


         This Modification to management Agreement is made and entered into this
15th day of December, 1999, by and between Murray Income Properties, II, LTD, a
Texas Limited Partnership ("Owner") and TC Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation ("Operator").


                                   WITNESSETH:

         Whereas, Owner and Operator entered into that certain Management
Agreement for the managing and operating of certain improved real property,
("Project") commonly known as Germantown Collection, dated August 8, 1990 and
extended December 30, 1993.

         Whereas, the Owner and Operator desire to modify and amend the
Management Agreement;

         Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the Modification to
Management Agreement, the sum of One and 00/100 Dollars ($1.00) in hand paid by
Owner to Operator, the mutual agreements herein contained and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto do agree as follows:

         1.    Owner and Operator acknowledge and agree the management Agreement
               shall be extended to expire on December 31, 2000.

         2.    All other terms and conditions of the Management Agreement not
               specifically amended by this Modification to Management
               Agreement, are hereby deemed to remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the foregoing
Modification as of the day and year written above.



Owner:                                        Operator:

Murray Income Properties, II, LTD             TC Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware
                                              corporation
BY:    Murray Realty Investors, IX, Inc.

BY:    /s/ Brent Buck                         BY:    /s/ Vince Dunavant
       -----------------------------------           --------------------------
       Brent Buck                                    Vince Dunavant

Title: Executive Vice President               Title: Senior Vice-President
       -----------------------------------           --------------------------
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick W. Hurley, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sport-Haley, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)            Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)            Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)            All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:                    May 24, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Patrick W. Hurley   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Patrick W. Hurley       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY POMO.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1920

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

To extend for 6 months the period for which chapter 12 

of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1920 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH 

2 CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, UNITED STATES 

3 CODE IS REENACTED. 

4 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 149 of title I of division 

5 C of Public Law 105–277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2004’’ each place 

8 it appears and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2004’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (a)—

10 (A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and in11 serting ‘‘December 31, 2003’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2003’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘January 1, 2004’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2004.

Passed the Senate November 25, 2003. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
---

---

Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that:  (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

|/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(principal executive officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ Sandra L. SagerSandra L. Sager, CPAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|November 9, 2006
|----------------

---

---
Order entered July 24 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00787
- CV
IN RE WILLIAM CLIFFORD BU TLER, Relator Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F92
- 20707 SV



### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s July 9, 2018 petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel J. DormanName:
                Daniel
      J. DormanTitle:
                President,
      Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
                May
      14, 2010





The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Order filed June 7, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00292-CR

____________

DUNG QUOC NGUYEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1226450

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed June 1, 2012. Our review has determined that a 

relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The 

record does not contain appellant's motion for rehearing filed April 29, 2012.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

on or before June 18, 2012, containing appellant's motion for rehearing filed April 29, 

2012.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a 

part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Steve Valenzuela, Chief Financial Officer of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    STEVE
VALENZUELASteve ValenzuelaVice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officerand Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)


Date: March 11, 2008
CLIFTON C. WILLIAMS, JR. (MAJOR, USMC)

NASA ASTRONAUT (DECEASED)

PERSONAL DATA: Born September 26, 1932, in Mobile, Alabama. Died on 

October 5, 1967, near Tallahassee, Florida, in the crash of a T-38 jet. He is survived 

by his wife Jane and a daughter. 

EDUCATION: Graduated from Murphy High School, Mobile, Alabama; received 

a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Auburn University, 

Auburn, Alabama.

ORGANIZATIONS: Associate member of the Society of Experimental Test Pilots 

and member of Pi Tau Sigma (national mechanical honorary, and Tau Beta Pi 

(national engineering society).

EXPERIENCE: Williams, a Marine Corps Major, graduated from the Navy Test 

Pilot School at Patuxent River, Maryland.

He was test pilot for three years in the Carrier Suitability Branch of the Flight Test Division at Patuxent River. His work 

there included land based and shipboard tests of the F8E, TF8A, F8E (attack), and A4E and automatic carrier landing 

system.

Of the 2,500 hours flying time accumulated, he has more than 2,100 hours in jet aircraft.

NASA EXPERIENCE: Williams was one of the third group of astronauts named by NASA in October 1963. He served as 

backup pilot for the Gemini 10 mission and worked in the areas of launch operations and crew safety.

Major Williams died on October 5, 1967, near Tallahassee, Florida, in the crash of a T-38 jet.

OCTOBER 1967

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Health Systems Solutions,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, B.M. Milvain, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ B. M.
              MilvainB.M.
                Milvain
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                April
                  16, 2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS JONES.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CIERRA LYNN CARTER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2498

[ October 13, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562019CF002402AXXXXX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Ross Frank Berlin, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano,

Assistant At torney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.