68620 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 215 / Monday, November 8, 2010 / Notices 

International Trade Commission, on 

November 2, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain wireless 

communication devices, portable music 

and data processing devices, computers 

and components thereof that infringe 

one or more of claim 12 of the ’333 

patent; claim 1 of the ’862 patent; claims 

1–4 of the ’697 patent, claims 1 and 17 

of the ’317 patent, claim 1 of the ’223 

patent; and claim 1 of the ’826 patent, 

and whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Motorola 

Mobility, Inc., 600 North US Highway 

45, Libertyville, Illinois 60048. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, 

California 95014. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Kevin G. Baer, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: November 3, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28150 Filed 11–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 

Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

September 27, 2010, a Consent Decree 

in United States of America, et al. v. 

Bristol Township, Civil Action No. 10– 

5049, was lodged with the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania. The United States and the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania also 

filed claims pursuant to the Clean Water 

Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq, and the 

Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law, 35 

P.S. §§ 691.1 et seq. The proposed 

Consent Decree relates to the operation 

of the publicly owned treatment works 

in Bristol Township, and obligates the 

Township to implement a series of 

immediate reforms, repairs and 

upgrades to more accurately assess the 

function of its collection system. With 

these tools, the consent decree requires 

the Township to perform a wide variety 

of short-, medium, and long-term 

studies to assess what additional capital 

improvements will be required. Once 

these studies are reviewed and 

approved by EPA and the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental Protection 

(PADEP), the consent decree requires 

that the capital improvements be 

completed in accordance with 

schedules that it establishes. The 

consent decree, which resolves the 

claims brought by the State and Federal 

plaintiffs, also obligates the Township 

to pay a civil penalty of $226,000 and 

establishes a sliding scale of stipulated 

penalties in case Bristol does not come 

into compliance with the conditions of 

its permit. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to this proposed Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, Attention: Nancy 

Flickinger (EES), and should refer to 

Unitd States, et al. v. Bristol Township, 

Civil Action No. 10–5049, DOJ # 90–5– 

1–1–09460. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney for the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania, 615 Chestnut Street, 

Suite 1250, Philadelphia, PA 19016. The 

consent decree also may be examined 

on the following Department of Justice 

Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed Consent Decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$ 16.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost for a full copy) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, Assistant Chief 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

Environment and Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28108 Filed 11–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Century Homebuilders, 

LLC, No. 1:09–CV–22258, was lodged 

with the U.S. District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida on 

November 1, 2010. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a First Amended Complaint 

filed by the United States of America 

against Century Homebuilders, LLC, 

formerly known as Century Builders 

Group, LLC; Century Partners Group, 

Ltd.; Century Homebuilders of South 

Florida, LLC; and Cesar E. Llano to 

obtain injunctive relief and civil 

penalties against the defendants for 

violating Department of the Army 

Permit Number 200106379 (IP–KBH) 

and section 301(a) of the Clean Water 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 215 / Monday, November 8, 2010 / Notices 68621 

Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a). The proposed 

Consent Decree resolves these 

allegations by requiring the defendants 

to enhance wetlands, to purchase 

mitigation credits, and to pay a civil 

penalty. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

Notice. Please address comments to 

Andrew J. Doyle, Trial Attorney, 

Environmental Defense Section, P.O. 

Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026– 

3986, and refer to United States v. 

Century Homebuilders, LLC, DJ # 90–5– 

1–1–18402. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, U.S. 

District Court, 400 North Miami 

Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128, or 

electronically at http://www.justice.gov/ 

enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. 

Maureen M. Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environment & 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28067 Filed 11–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of October 18, 2010 

through October 22, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES