alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Business and Operations Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).
    Date/Time: November 16, 2010; 1 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (EST).
    November 17, 2010; 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. (EST).
    Place: Arlington Hilton, Gallery II Conference Room. Arlington, 
VA.
    Type of Meeting: OPEN.
    Contact Person: Patty Balanga, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8100.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice concerning issues related 
to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's 
business operations.

Agenda

November 16, 2010

    Welcome/Introductions; OIRM/CIO/BFA Updates; Human Resources/
Capital Topic; Committee Discussion: Prepare for Meeting with NSF 
Deputy Director; Discussion with Deputy Director; Closing Committee 
Discussion.

November 17, 2010

    IT Policy Issues; Open Government; International Facilities 
Subcommittee; Committee Expectations/Closing Discussions.

    Dated: October 20, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26850 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**WARREN RESOURCES, INC.**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Larkin, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    |   | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/   Timothy A. Larkin              |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy   A. Larkin                  |   |
| *Executive   Vice President,*        |   |
| *Chief   Financial Officer*          |   |
| *And   Principal Accounting Officer* |   |
|                                 |   |
| May   4, 2011                        |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Health Systems
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, B.M. Milvain, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By:      /s/ B. M. Milvain
         ---------------------------
         B.M. Milvain
         Principal Executive Officer
         February 14, 2005
June 2022

NASA ADVISORY COUNCIL

Council and 5 Committees

Council

Gen. Lester Lyles, Chair

Waleed Abdalati 

Hon. Charles Bolden

John-Paul Clarke

Daniel Dumbacher 

Hon. Eric Fanning 

Wayne Hale

Hon. Jane Harman 

Hon. Kay Bailey Hutchison

Michael Johns 

Daniel Olivas 

Krista Paquin

Elisabeth Paté-Cornell

Charlie Williams, Jr.

Ellen Williams

Jacklyn Wynn

Margaret Kivelson, Ex Officio, SSB Chair, NAS

Ilan Kroo, Ex Officio, ASEB Chair, NAE

Aeronautics Committee

John-Paul Clarke, Chair

Peter Bunce

Jay Dryer 

Michael Dumais 

Lisa Ellman 

Naveed Hussain 

Nicole Key

Natgesh Manikoth

Susan Pfingstler 

Helen Reed

Hassan Shahidi 

David Silver 

Human Exploration and Operations Committee

Wayne Hale, Chair 

Kwatsi Alibaruho 

Nancy Ann Budden 

Lynn Cline

Stephen Condon 

Doug Ebersole 

Michael Lopez-Alegria 

Mark McDaniel

George Sowers

James Voss 

Science Committee

Ellen Williams, Chair

Noel Bakhtian

Vinton Cerf

Linda Godwin

Michael Liemohn

Amy Mainzer

Willie May

Sara Tucker

Marc Weiser

Charles Woodward 

STEM Engagement Committee

Daniel Dumbacher, Chair

Kristin De Vivo

Norman Fortenberry

Raymond Mellado 

Jamarius Reid

Darryl Williams

Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee

Michael Johns, Chair

Lisa Callahan

Michael Gazarik 

Kathleen Howell

Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio 

Andrew Rush

Brad Tousley

Mitchell Walker

Mary Ellen Weber
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CARRIE STERN, DECEASED.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 1, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

JAMES EARL LINDSEY,

Movant.

No. 10-3006

(D.C. Nos. 5:03-CR-40011, 

5:06-CV-4143-RDR)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER

Before O’BRIEN, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

James Earl Lindsey filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion arguing the

district court failed to consider the merits of the claims set forth his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The district court

concluded the motion required this court’s authorization under § 2255(h) and

transferred it to this court. Mr. Lindsey has moved for remand, arguing his Rule

60(b)(6) motion does not require authorization because it merely challenges the

integrity of the § 2255 proceedings. See Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 532

(2005). We disagree.

When a petitioner argues the district court failed to rule on a claim, he is

challenging the integrity of the habeas proceedings, and therefore he is not

required to obtain authorization under § 2255(h). See Peach v. United States,

Appellate Case: 10-3006 Document: 01018375113 Date Filed: 03/01/2010 Page: 1
-2-

468 F.3d 1269, 1271 (10th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). But a comparison of

Mr. Lindsey’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion with the district court’s order denying his

§ 2255 motion shows the district court did in fact consider and decide the five

ineffective-assistance claims Mr. Lindsey identifies. Compare Rule 60(b)(6)

Motion at 3-5, with 1/29/2007 Order at 5-8, 8-9, 11-12, 12-15, 17. When

Mr. Lindsey complains the district court failed to reach the merits of his claims,

he really is arguing the district court failed to rule correctly on those claims. 

Such assertions constitute claims for relief that must receive authorization under

§ 2255(h). See Gonzalez, 545 U.S. at 532 (“A motion can also be said to bring a

‘claim’ if it attacks the federal court’s previous resolution of a claim on the

merits, since alleging that the court erred in denying habeas relief on the merits is

effectively indistinguishable from alleging that the movant is, under the

substantive provisions of the statutes, entitled to habeas relief.” (footnote

omitted)). Accordingly, the district court did not err in transferring the Rule

60(b)(6) motion to this court.

The motion for remand is DENIED, and this matter is terminated.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3006 Document: 01018375113 Date Filed: 03/01/2010 Page: 2
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 9, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1058

Lower Tribunal No. 20-25636

________________

Florida Fair Housing Alliance, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

25 Plaza Corp., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. 

Lopez, Judge.

Shepard, Smith, Kohlmyer & Hand, P.A., and Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III 

and Andrew J. Hand (Maitland), for appellant.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, and Jonathan R. Weiss and Amanda 

E. Preston, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
- SBIR/STTR Home
- Opportunities   - Phase I
  - Phase II
  - Post Phase II
  - SBIR Ignite
  - I-Corps
  - TABA
- Resources
- Submissions
- Get In Touch

## Phase III

Phase III is the commercialization of innovative technologies, products, and services resulting from either a Phase I or Phase II contract. This includes further development of technologies for transition into NASA programs, other Government agencies, or the private sector. Phase III contracts are funded from sources other than the SBIR and STTR programs and may be awarded without further competition.

**For more information on Phase III contracts, reach out to your Center point of contact** or check out the NASA SBIR/STTR Phase III Customer Guide below.

## 					Resources				

## Phase III Customer Guide

Feb 26, 2024

PDF (355.99 KB)

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Space Technology Mission Directorate

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) / Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR)

SBIR/STTR Post Phase II Opportunities

SBIR/STTR Resources
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the
best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 1, 2007



/s/ James C. FloresJames C. FloresChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LETTICE A. GARRISON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v. 

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO; ERASMO

BRAVO, Warden, Guadalupe County

Correctional Facility,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-2039

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01120-WJ-WDS)

ORDER

Before TACHA, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

This is an appeal from a non-final order of the magistrate judge denying the

petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss for lack of appellate

jurisdiction.

This order is not directly appealable to this court. Except for proceedings

conducted by the magistrate judge on consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c), a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal taken directly

from a decision of a magistrate judge. See Colorado Building & Construction

Trade Council v. B.B. Andersen Construction Co., 879 F.2d 809 (10th Cir. 1989). 

Appellate Case: 10-2039 Document: 01018373914 Date Filed: 02/25/2010 Page: 1
-2-

Moreover, the denial of the appointment of counsel is not immediately

appealable. See Cotner v. Mason, 657 F.2d 1390 (10th Cir. 1981).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-2039 Document: 01018373914 Date Filed: 02/25/2010 Page: 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE GEORGE MILAM HALL, doing 

business as The Alamo, 

 Debtor. 

__________________________________ 

GEORGE MILAM HALL, 

 Appellant, 

 v. 

ERIC C. RAJALA, Trustee, DAVID R. 

KLAASSEN, and GREAT SOUTHERN 

BANK, 

 Appellees. 

BAP No. KS-10-028 

Bankr. No. 06-40872 

Chapter 12 

ORDER TRANSFERRING 

APPEAL 

TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

May 25, 2010 

————————————————— 

 The matter before the Court is the Election (“Election”) filed by David R. 

Klaassen (“Appellee”). In the Election, Appellee has timely filed an objection to the 

disposition of this matter by this Court. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(1) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(e), it is HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

(1) This appeal is transferred to the United States District Court. 

BAP Appeal No. 10-28 Docket No. 15 Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 1 of 2
(2) Any deadlines, notices of deficiency, or orders to show cause 

previously set by this Court are VACATED. 

(3) This Court’s record is transmitted to the United States Bankruptcy 

Court. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-28 Docket No. 15 Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              NOV-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                             138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   142
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                          49
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       142
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       41
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     88
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 88
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        88
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 2,
1996.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,281
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                    151,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,346<F1>
<PP&E>                                          82,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,499<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,861
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,499
<SALES>                                        181,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,549
<CGS>                                          135,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                       926
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09<F5>
<FN>
<F1>OTHER CURRENT ASSETS                         4,128
<F2>OTHER ASSETS                                 1,651
<F3>LONG TERM DEBT                              37,255
<F4>DEFERRED INCOME TAXES                        1,263
<F5>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2036

For the relief of Jose Buendia Balderas, Alicia Aranda De Buendia, and 

Ana Laura Buendia Aranda. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2004

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Jose Buendia Balderas, Alicia Aranda De 

Buendia, and Ana Laura Buendia Aranda.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JOSE 

4 BUENDIA BALDERAS, ALICIA ARANDA DE 

5 BUENDIA, AND ANA LAURA BUENDIA 

6 ARANDA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

8 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act, Jose Buendia Balderas, Alicia Aranda De Buendia, 

10 and Ana Laura Buendia Aranda shall each be eligible for 
2

•S 2036 IS 

1 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

2 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi3 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi4 grant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment 

5 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

6 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Jose Buendia 

7 Balderas, Alicia Aranda De Buendia, and Ana Laura 

8 Buendia Aranda enter the United States before the filing 

9 deadline specified in subsection (c), Jose Buendia 

10 Balderas, Alicia Aranda De Buendia, and Ana Laura 

11 Buendia Aranda shall be considered to have entered and 

12 remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of 

13 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation14 ality Act as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

15 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

16 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap17 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica18 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

19 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

20 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

21 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res22 idence to Jose Buendia Balderas, Alicia Aranda De 

23 Buendia, and Ana Laura Buendia Aranda, the Secretary 

24 of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 3, 

25 during the current or next following fiscal year, the total 
3

•S 2036 IS 

1 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na2 tives of the country of birth of Jose Buendia Balderas, 

3 Alicia Aranda De Buendia, and Ana Laura Buendia 

4 Aranda under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immi6 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun7 try of birth of Jose Buendia Balderas, Alicia Aranda De 

8 Buendia, and Ana Laura Buendia Aranda under section 

9 202(e) of that Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1222

JUANA DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT; ELLEN HAMILTON, Executive Director; DEBBIE BARRETT, Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-3851-4-22) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 13, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John A. Gaines, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Arthur E. Justice, Jr., TURNER, PADGETT, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Juana Davis appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Pee Dee Coalition Against Domestic And Sexual Assault and two of its employees. On appeal, Davis contends that the district court erred by finding that she failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation for having engaged in protected contact. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Pee Dee Coalition , No. CA-98-3851-4-22 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED