alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

Of Chief Executive
Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of eDiets.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin N. McGrath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 11, 2010



By:

/s/ Kevin N. McGrathName:

Kevin N. McGrathTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Intent To Expand Implementation of the TRICARE Program 
in Alaska

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health 
Affairs, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health 
Affairs announces the intent to expand implementation of the TRICARE 
Program in Alaska. The expansion will require the Managed Care Support 
contractor to develop and operate a TRICARE civilian preferred provider 
network under 32 CFR 199.17(p) in two Prime Service Areas in the state 
of Alaska. Eligible TRICARE beneficiaries will be permitted to enroll 
in Prime with assignment to Military Treatment Facility (MTF) Primary 
Care Managers (PCMs) consistent with the established priorities 
provided in 32 CFR 199.17(c) or assignment to a PCM within the TRICARE 
civilian preferred provider network. The program will be offered to the 
Prime Service Areas around the MTFs located on Fort Wainwright and 
Eielson Air Force Base.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC Stephen Oates, TRICARE Policy and 
Operations Directorate, TRICARE Management Activity, 5111 Leesburg 
Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, (703) 681-0039.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-27771 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 TAHITI THREE, LLC, a

3 New Mexico Limited 

4 Liability Company, 

5 Plaintiff-Appellee,

6 v. No. A-1-CA-36851

7 ERIC SANDOVAL and

8 EARTH PRODUCTS, LLC

9 a New Mexico Limited

10 Liability Company,

11 Defendants-Appellants.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

13 Valerie A. Huling, District Judge

14 Michael Danoff

15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellee

17 James A. Chavez

18 Albuquerque, NM

19 for Appellants

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 ZAMORA, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.

4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 

6 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 

9 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge 

10 

11 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2056 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2056

   To increase the penalties for violations by television and radio 
   broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, 
                    indecent, and profane language.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2004

Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Graham of South Carolina) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the penalties for violations by television and radio 
   broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, 
                    indecent, and profane language.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR OBSCENE, INDECENT, AND PROFANE 
              BROADCASTS.

    Section 503(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
503(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
        subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
        subparagraph:
    ``(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if the violator is--
            ``(i)(I) a broadcast station licensee or permittee; or
            ``(II) an applicant for any broadcast license, permit, 
        certificate, or other instrument or authorization issued by the 
        Commission; and
            ``(ii) determined by the Commission under paragraph (1) to 
        have broadcast obscene, indecent, or profane language,
the amount of any forfeiture penalty determined under this subsection 
shall not exceed $275,000 for each violation or each day of a 
continuing violation, except that the amount assessed for any 
continuing violation shall not exceed a total of $3,000,000 for any 
single act or failure to act.''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), 
        by striking ``subparagraph (A) or (B)'' and inserting 
        ``subparagraph (A), (B), or (C)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement 
under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear 
Energy Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 514,705.9 kg 
of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride (68.00% U), 350,000 kg of 
which is uranium, from Areva Resources Canada, Inc. (Areva Resources) 
in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to URENCO in Gronau, Germany. The 
material, which is currently located at Areva Resources, will be 
transferred to URENCO-Gronau for enrichment and use as fuel in civilian 
nuclear power programs in the United States and France. The material 
was originally obtained by Areva Resources from the Feed Component 
Substitution Implementing Contract.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: October 1, 2010.

    For the Department of Energy.
Thomas P. D'Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-27498 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
www.nasa.gov

UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MISSOULA

NASA Remote Sensing Experiences with 

Montana's Rural and Tribal Communities

Jessie Herbert-Meny 

2/01/22 - 1/31/23

Hands-on investigation at spectrUM Discovery 

Area

Credits: University of Montana

The project will engage K-12 students and their families 

in activities addressing the role of NASA’s remote 

sensing capabilities in sensing fires. A "Montana VR 

Fire Experience" will be incorporated into museum 

programming, including field trips and outreach with 

rural and native communities on the Flathead Indian 

Reservation. In collaboration with SciNation, the 

museum’s community advisory group on the 

Reservation, the project will embed NASA Fire Remote 

Sensing activities at the Science Learning Tent at 

community Powwows. 50,000 museum visitors, 

including over 1,500 native youth and community 

members who attend programming on the Flathead 

Indian Reservation.

List of Partners:

• University of Montana Autonomous Aerial

Systems Office

• SciNation on the Flathead Reservation

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0449, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A. S., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-18-00985-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-00333J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, L.G. aka L.S. aka L.S., has filed an unopposed motion for a second

extension of time to file her brief. The motion is granted. Appellant’s brief is due to be 

filed with this Court no later than Friday, January 18, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P.

28.4(a), 38.6(d). 

This appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship. Accordingly, 

this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of October 

30, 2018, the date the notice of appeal was filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX.

R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West

2013). Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Russell Lloyd____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 10, 2019___
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 5, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Philip Quinlan (individual member), Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM; and QFAB Bioinformatics, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, 3E Company Environmental, Ecological and Engineering, Carlsbad, CA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

In addition, the following members have changed their names: Accelrys to Dassault Systèmes, Surenes, Cedex, FRANCE; and GGA to EPAM Systems, Newtown, PA.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 16, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2014 (79 FR 42816).                  

Patricia A. Brink,  

Director of Civil Enforcement Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-24043 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD

An Expanding Universe: Bringing NASA's 

ViewSpace to the Fargo-Moorhead Area

Dr. Sara K Schultz

2/01/22 - 1/31/24

A partnership with local library districts to deliver NASA 

content and new original programming for K-12 families 

and underserved populations; in this region, new 

Americans and refugees comprise an important 

segment of that population. Each library will host a 

NASA ViewSpace kiosk, to promote greater awareness 

of NASA programming. Original programming and 

hands-on activities tied to six of the NASA ViewSpace 

modules will be delivered at the MSUM Planetarium, 

Oceanarium and Regional Science Center, and 

promoted by all the libraries. This project will highlight 

the NASA communication themes of “Earth. Your 

Home, Our Mission” and “Solar System and Beyond: 

Discovering the Secrets of the Universe”.

List of Partners:

• Moorhead Public Library

• Fargo Public Library

• West Fargo Public Library

Viewspace lets users reveal hidden objects like 

stars forming inside a pillar of gas and dust.

Credits: viewspace.org

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0448, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rent-Way,
Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Rent-Way, Inc. and will be retained by Rent-Way, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:   March 31, 2003                        /s/ William E. Morgenstern
                                               --------------------------
                                                   William E. Morgenstern
                                                   Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   March 31, 2003                        /s/ William A. McDonnell
                                               --------------------------
                                                   William A. McDonnell
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
#### Walker *v.*Hesle et al.

Contract to Pay Money — Cannot he Discharged with treasury notes.

No person is legally bound to accept treasury notes in satisfaction of a contract to pay money.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 5, 1865.

Opinion

by the Court :

The only question presented by this record is, whether the court below erred in adjudging that appellant should accept *treasury notes*in satisfaction of the obligation on appellees to pay him money and surrender up to them the written evidence of their indebtedness ?

This question was elaborately discussed and very fully considered by this court in the cases of Griswold *v.*Hepburn, and of *332Hawkins *v.*Chenault, decided summer term, 1865, in which casés a majority of the court held (Judge Williams dissenting) that the appellants' were not legally bound to accept *treasury notes*in satisfaction of their contract to pay money, and to the principles, settléd in those cases a majority of the court adheres (and from which Judge Williams dissents).

Wherefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to render a judgment in favor of appellant conformable with the principles of this opinion.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-51266 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HECTOR AMILCAR RUBI-VALLECILLO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-652-1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hector A milcar R ubi-Vallecillo a p peals his 46-month within-guidelines sentence for illegal reentry after removal a s subs t a n t i v ely unreasonable. He argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the illegal reentry g uideline lacks an empirical basis and double counts criminal history, that his motive for returning to the United States was benign, and that illegal reentry essentially is a mere trespass offense. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Septem ber 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-51266 Document: 00512386211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/25/2013No. 12-51266

“[A] sentence w ithin a properly calculated G uideline range is presumptively reasonable.” United States v. A lonzo , 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Rubi-Vallecillo a sserts that a presumption o f reasonableness s hould not apply to his within-guidelines sentence because the i llegal reentry guideline is

n o t supported by empirical data, but h e recognizes that t his arg u m e n t i s foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte , 569 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir. 2009). We prev i o usly have rejected similar arguments c hallenging the reasonableness of a s entence. See Duarte, 5 69 F .3d at 5 29-31 (arguing the lack of a n empirical basis f or the applicable guidelin e r e n dered the s entence unreasonable); United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008) (arguing that benign motive for reentry rendered sentence unreasonable); United S tates v. Aguirre-Villa, 460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Ci r . 2006) (arguing that illegal reentry is a mere trespass offense). In the instant c ase, the district court had before it both mitigating and aggravating factors. I t balanced these factors and determined that a sentence at the middle of the applicable guidelines range
was appropriate. The fact t hat this court “might reasonably have concluded that

a d i f f e r ent s entence was appropriate is insufficient to justify r eversal of t h e district court.” G all v. United States , 5 52 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). We c o nclude there is no reason to di s t u r b t h e p resumption of r easonableness i n this case. See United States v. Cooks , 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-51266 Document: 00512386211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/25/2013