65508 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

subsistence harvest and the 

implementation of community-level 

conservation programs in both the 

United States and Russia. 

The second meeting of the 

Commission took place June 7–10, 2010, 

in Anchorage, Alaska. During this 

meeting, the Commission evaluated the 

options provided by the SWG and 

determined that establishing a limit to 

the subsistence harvest of polar bears 

from the Alaska-Chukotka polar bear 

population was needed. Based on the 

recommendation and risk assessment 

relative to hypothetical harvest levels 

and traditional knowledge of the native 

people, the Commission determined 

that no more than 58 polar bears per 

year may be taken, of which no more 

than 19 animals may be females from 

the Alaska-Chukotka polar bear 

population. The Commission 

determined that all human-caused 

mortality, i.e., subsistence harvest as 

well as any bears that could be taken in 

defense of human life, to the AlaskaChukotka polar bear population will be 

counted toward this annual limit. 

Further, the Commission determined 

that the two countries will work 

together over the coming year to identify 

legal requirements and documents 

needed to implement the determined 

subsistence harvest limit and that 

further discussion would take place at 

the next Commission meeting in June 

2011. 

The adoption of an annual take limit 

by the Commission is a significant 

accomplishment in the conservation 

and management of the shared AlaskaChukotka polar bear population. The 

additional data obtained through 

enhanced management, especially in 

Russia where only limited information 

has been available, as well as increased 

monitoring of the previously unknown 

take of bears, will provide vital 

information and greater understanding 

of the status and trends of the AlaskaChukotka polar bear population. 

Resultant data will enable the countries 

to develop a more effective and robust 

strategy for the conservation and 

management of this shared population. 

The regulated subsistence harvest will 

also provide for the cultural, spiritual, 

and nutritional needs of the native 

people of Chukotka. It is anticipated 

that the illegal hunting of polar bears in 

Russia will decrease dramatically with 

the involvement of native Chukotkans 

in the implementation of subsistence 

harvest monitoring and management 

and enhanced legal enforcement. The 

Commission tasked the SWG with 

conducting an annual review of the 

annual subsistence take and providing a 

recommendation to the Commission 

each year confirming continuation of 

the existing subsistence harvest limit or 

specifying a new harvest limit 

recommendation. 

Determination of the Commission 

Therefore, as discussed above, and as 

required by Section 507(b) of the 

MMPA, the Commission notified the 

Secretary of the Interior (by letter dated 

June 23, 2010, and received on July 1, 

2010) of its determination to limit the 

annual take of polar bears from the 

Alaska-Chukotka population to no more 

than 58 animals, of which no more than 

19 may be female, to be shared equally 

between the two jurisdictions. Each 

country is responsible for developing 

documents describing how the regulated 

harvest will be implemented to be 

reported at the next Commission 

meeting. The United States and Russian 

Federation will work together over the 

coming year to identify the legal 

requirements and documents needed to 

implement the identified harvest limit. 

This will be further discussed at the 

next Commission meeting in June 2011. 

As required by Section 507(b) of the 

MMPA, notice of the Commission’s 

determination of taking limits for the 

Alaska-Chukotka polar bear population 

is hereby published in the Federal 

Register. 

Dated: October 12, 2010. 

Daniel M. Ashe, 

Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26864 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled In Re Certain Automated Media 

Library Devices, DN 2762; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the 

Commission, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

filed on behalf of Overland Storage, Inc. 

on October 19, 2010. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain automated media 

library devices. The complaint names as 

respondents BDT AG of Rottweil, 

Germany; BDT–Solutions GmbH & Co. 

KG of Rottweil, Germany; BDT 

Automation Technology (Zhuhai FTZ) 

Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai Guangdong, China; 

BDT de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. of 

Tlaquepaque, Jalisco, Mexico; BDT 

Products, Inc. of Irvine, CA; Dell Inc. of 

Round Rock, TX; and International 

Business Machines Corp. of Armonk, 

NY. 

The complainant, proposed 

respondents, other interested parties, 

and members of the public are invited 

to file comments, not to exceed five 

pages in length, on any public interest 

issues raised by the complaint. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of an exclusion order and/or a 

cease and desist order in this 

investigation would negatively affect the 

public health and welfare in the United 

States, competitive conditions in the 

United States economy, the production 

of like or directly competitive articles in 

the United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the orders are used 

in the United States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the potential orders; 

(iii) indicate the extent to which like 

or directly competitive articles are 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65509 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2762’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

Issued: October 19, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26788 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–728] 

In the Matter of Collaborative System 

Products and Components Thereof (II); 

Notice of Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motion To 

Amend the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 13) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia 

Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4737. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on July 19, 2010, based on a complaint 

filed by eInstruction Corporation of 

Denton, Texas on May 12, 2010. 75 FR 

41889 (Jul. 19, 2010). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain collaborative 

system products and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

various claims of United States Patent 

No. 6,930,673. The complaint named 

the following respondents: Promethean 

Inc. of Alpharetta, Georgia, and 

Promethean Technology Shenzhen Ltd. 

of Shanghai, China. 

On September 14, 2010, eInstruction 

moved to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to add 

Promethean Ltd. of Blackburn, 

Lancashire, United Kingdom as a 

respondent to this investigation. On 

September 30, 2010, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, Order No. 13, granting the 

motion to amend. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

Issued: October 19, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26775 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Pursuant to 28 CFR 50.7 and 

Department of Justice policy, notice is 

hereby given that on October 14, 2010 

a proposed Consent Decree with 

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP 

(‘‘Georgia-Pacific’’) was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Wisconsin in a case 

captioned United States and the State of 

Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Case No. 

10–C–910 (E.D. Wis.). The Complaint in 

that case alleges claims against GeorgiaPacific and eleven other defendants 

concerning polychlorinated biphenyl 

contamination at the Lower Fox River 

and Green Bay Superfund Site in 

northeastern Wisconsin (the ‘‘Site’’). 

The proposed Consent Decree would 

resolve the United States’ and the 

State’s claims against Georgia-Pacific on 

terms and conditions set forth in the 

Consent Decree. Under the proposed 

settlement, Georgia-Pacific would 

stipulate that it is liable, along with 

other defendants, for performance of all 

required cleanup work at the Site 

downstream from a line across the River 

slightly upstream of the company’s 

paper mill in the City of Green Bay. 

Georgia-Pacific would in turn receive a 

covenant not to sue and statutory 

contribution protection for portions of 

the River upstream from that line. As 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES