alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: August 10, 2006

                                         BY:   /s/  Paul S. Shipman
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Paul S. Shipman
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Chairman of the Board
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Heavy Lift Capability 

2011-02-03 (EC-02) 

Recommendation: 

NASA should promptly start development of a new expendable main engine by a U.S. 


contractor that will supply sufficient power to support a 130 MT or a greater launch vehicle 


capability. This new engine must support a launch vehicle schedule consistent with the need of 


the 130 MT launch vehicle schedule. 


Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 


For the past 40 years, NASA has relied on the Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSME). Russia 


and other countries have developed main engines for their programs. New technologies and 


personnel resources as well as higher thrust main engine requirements are needed. 


Consequences ofNo Action on the Recommendation: 


The U.S. could potentially lose its leadership in space exploration. 


NASA Response: 


NASA concurs with the concern for the U.S. to remain a leader in propulsion capabilities. 


However, while NASA understands the desire for the development of a new expendable main 


engine at present, we recommend that development ofthe Space Launch System be based on 


liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen propulsion core stage, upper stage, and main engines, taking the 


opportunity to gain efficiencies through synergies in manufacturing and systems in the core and 


upper stage. This key decision takes advantage ofthe existing knowledge base built from a 


40-year investment in liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen propulsion systems, expertise, experience, 


and supporting infrastructure. It is also in alignment with direction in the NASA Authorization 


Act of20 1 O. NASA will build off our experience in liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen propUlsion 


while implementing modem manufacturing approaches to reduce the production and operations 


costs. New manufacturing improvements have been incorporated into the new J-2X upper 


stage engine, and they continue to evolve. In parallel, NASA plans to conduct a full and open 


competition for the first-stage boosters that will open the field to consideration ofnew solid and 


liquid boosters that can further technologies through these developments. 


While the current recommended architecture utilizes a liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen 


propulsion system, the Agency is starting a new project in liquid oxygenJkerosene propulsion at 


the Marshall Space Flight Center under the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) program. In 


FY12, it is funded at $6.7M in full-cost accounting. The AES Liquid Propulsion Systems 


project is testing components from the AJ-26 engine that is produced by Aerojet for the 


Taurus II launch vehicle. The AJ-26 engine is a derivative ofthe Russian NK-33 engine. The 


Enclosure 
2 

AES project will help to advance improved engine components and physics-based analytical 

models to predict engine performance. This work will also be an investment in regaining the 

knowledge base and expertise in liquid/kerosene, providing a more balanced understanding of 

propulsion technology among our engineering workforce.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27463]



[[Page 67143]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 20, 2010, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
application received. A permit was issued on October 21, 2010 to:
    Mahlon C. Kennicutt, II, Permit No. 2011-017.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27463 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### Armentrout *v.*Moranda.

A publication to be a libel must tend to injure the plaintiff’s reputation, and expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.

ERROR to the *Marion*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action for a libel. General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendant.

The alleged libel, as shown by the declaration, is as follows: *427“ Mr. *Armentrout*(the plaintiff meaning), Sir, Have you any knowledge of those black cassinette pants of mine which you put into your bundle, when you moved to Mr. *Allison’s*from Mr. *Brown’s*the last time? Have you ambition sufficient to call a woman a liar? Bring back my breeches, and I will pay you the *nails.*— Moranda.”

*J. Morrison, S. Major,*and *L. Barbour,*for the plaintiff.

*W. Quarles,*for the defendant.

No extrinsic facts are alleged, nor is there any statement made as to the meaning of the charge. If the suit is sustainable, it is because the matter complained of, *in itself,*imports a libel. A libel is said to be a malicious defamation expressed in printing or writing, or by signs, pictures, &c., tending to injure the reputation of another, and thereby exposing such person to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule. 2 Selw. N. P. 1061. But that is not the character of the publication before us. There is here no charge of dishonesty, or of any other misconduct which could injure the plaintiff’s reputation.

*Per Curiam.-*

-The judgment is affirmed with costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Sina Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Charles Chao, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Finance and
Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Charles ChaoCharles ChaoChief Financial OfficerMarch 15, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID BYNUM.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT 

JERRY DON FLIPPO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN JONES, Director,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-6081

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-01240-C)

(D. W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before KELLY, EBEL and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. 

 Jerry Flippo, a pro se litigant, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking 

relief from his Oklahoma convictions for attempted grand larceny and false personation. 

Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell issued a thorough analysis recommending Mr. Flippo’s 

petition be denied, and the district court adopted that recommendation in its entirety. The 

district court also denied Mr. Flippo’s requests to receive a certificate of appealability 

(“COA”) and to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Mr. Flippo now renews these 

 *

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, 

res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value 

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

August 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 10-6081 Document: 01018481331 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 Page: 1
2 

requests. For the reasons that follow, we DENY his request for a COA, but we GRANT 

his request to proceed IFP. 

We will grant a COA “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial 

of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). “To meet this standard, a petitioner must 

demonstrate that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his 

constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve 

encouragement to proceed further.” Boutwell v. Keating, 399 F.3d 1203, 1211 (10th Cir. 2005) 

(quotation omitted). In this case, we do not think reasonable jurists could disagree with the 

thorough analysis of the magistrate judge, nor do we think his claims require further analysis. 

Thus, we deny Mr. Flippo’s COA based on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as 

adopted by the district court. 

 However, unlike the district court, we do not think Mr. Flippo filed his petition in 

bad faith. Therefore, we grant Mr. Flippo’s request to proceed IFP. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

David M. Ebel 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 10-6081 Document: 01018481331 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 Page: 2
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR V. WEISSE, DECEASED.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 23, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

BRIGIDO QUEZADA, 

 Plaintiff 

and 

DELFINO ENRIQUEZ, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY; JANET

NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the U.S.

Department of Homeland Security;

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (USCIS)

Division of the Homeland Security;

MICHAEL R. AYTES, USCIS Acting

Deputy Director; DONALD NEUFELD,

USCIS Acting Associates Director,

Domestic Operations Directorate; LORI

SCIALABBA, USCIS Associate Director,

Refugee, Asylum and International

Operations Directorate; PEARL CHANG,

USCIS Acting Chief, Office of Policy and

Strategy; MARIO ORTIZ, USCIS District

Director; ELIZABETH LEE, USCIS

Albuquerque Field Office, Field Office

Director, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-2083

 (D.C. No. 1:09-CV-00649-JCH-WDS)

ORDER

Appellate Case: 10-2083 Document: 01018482587 Date Filed: 08/23/2010 Page: 1
2

On July 29, 2010, the court entered an order stating, among other things, that 

appellant’s opening brief was due on August 16, 2010 or with appeal would be dismissed. 

To date, appellant has not filed the opening brief; accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for

failure to prosecute. See 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2083 Document: 01018482587 Date Filed: 08/23/2010 Page: 2
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 27, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY DESHAZER, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

DOUGLAS DESHAZER; MARY

DESHAZER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GODDARD PERRY AND VOGEL;

GREGORY L. GODDARD, 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-8076

(D.C. No. 2:03-CV-00260-CAB)

(D. of Wyoming)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-8076 Document: 01018356804 Date Filed: 01/27/2010 Page: 1
SINA CORPORATION
2007 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AGREEMENT
 DD MM YY SINA Corporation Employee AA
  Restricted Share Units XXX
 Vesting of Restricted Share Units DD MM YY
 Termination of Service
 Settlement of Restricted Share Units
 Withholding Taxes




---



##### 



Tax Advice
 Non-Transferability of Restricted Share Units
 Restriction on Transfer
 Share Certificate Restrictive Legends
 Representations, Warranties, Covenants, and Acknowledgments
 Voting and Other Rights
 No Employment Rights
 2




---



##### 



Notices
 Entire Agreement; Enforcement of Rights
 Governing Law
 Arbitration
 Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 Counterparts
  (Signature Page Follows)
 3




---



##### 



SINA CORPORATIONBy:(Signature)Name:Title: RECIPIENT:By:(Signature)Address:Telephone Number:Email Address: 4
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA RIVERA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, DBA Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 15932

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv
- 01332

- JAD

- GWF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA , Circuit Judges.

Norma Rivera ap peals pro se from the district court’ s judgment dismissing
her action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claims

. We
have jurisdiction unde r 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Fed eral R ule of Civ il P roc edure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim

. See Kwan v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 26 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 15932

SanMedica Int’l , 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm

. The district court properly dismissed Rivera’s FDCPA claim under 15
U.S.C. § 1692f

(1) because Rivera failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the
alleged communications were attempt s to collect a “ debt ” as defined by the

FDCPA

. See Ho v. Recon T rust Co. , 858 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 201 7 ) (“[A]ctions

taken to facil itate a non

-

judicial foreclos ure, such as sending the notic e of default
and notice of sale, ar e not attempts to collect ‘debt’ as that term is defined by the
FDCPA.”); Dowers v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC , 852 F.3d 964, 970

- 71 (9th Cir.
2017) (explaining that “while the FDCPA regulates se curity interest enforcement
activity, it does so only through Section 1692 f (6)”) ; s ee also Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556
U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient
factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief th at is plausible on its
face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
The district court properly dismissed Rivera’s FDCPA claim under § 1692g

because Rivera failed to allege facts sufficient to show that she made a timely debt
validation request or that defendant’s response failed to comply with the
requirements of § 1692g

. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692g; Iqbal , 556 U.S. at 678

. The district court properly dismissed Rivera’s FDCPA claims under3 16

- 15932

§§ 1692d, 1692

j, and 1692 i because Rivera failed to allege fa cts sufficient to state
plausible claim s for relief. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692d, 1692j and 1692i ; Iqbal , 556

U.S. at 678

. We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir . 2009).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27505]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion (ComE-IN); Notice 
of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice 
is hereby given of a meeting of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic 
Inclusion, which will be held in Washington, DC. The Advisory Committee 
will provide advice and recommendations on initiatives to expand access 
to banking services by underserved populations.

DATES: Tuesday, November 16, 2010, from 8:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the FDIC Board Room on the sixth 
floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, 
Committee Management Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898-7043.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: The agenda will be focused on children's savings, 
underserved studies, and policy and project updates. The agenda may be 
subject to change. Any changes to the agenda will be announced at the 
beginning of the meeting.
    Type of Meeting: The meeting will be open to the public, limited 
only by the space available on a first-come, first-served basis. For 
security reasons, members of the public will be subject to security 
screening procedures and must present a valid photo identification to 
enter the building. The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids 
(e.g., sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those 
attendees needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or 
TTY) at least two days before the meeting to make necessary 
arrangements. Written statements may be filed with the committee before 
or after the meeting. This ComE-IN meeting will be Webcast live via the 
Internet at: http://www.vodium.com/goto/fdic/advisorycommittee.asp. 
This service is free and available to anyone with the following systems 
requirements: http://www.vodium.com/home/sysreq.html. Adobe Flash 
Player is required to view these presentations. The latest version of 
Adobe Flash Player can be downloaded at http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash. Installation 
questions or troubleshooting help can be found at the same link. For 
optimal viewing, a high speed Internet connection is recommended. The 
ComE-IN meeting videos are made available on-demand approximately two 
weeks after the event.

    Dated: October 27, 2010.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2010-27505 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
S. 1663

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BARRIER

RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The 2 maps subtitled ‘‘NC–07P’’, relating

to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal

Barrier Resources System Cape Fear Unit NC–07P, that are

included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources

System’’ and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier

Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), are hereby replaced by 2 other

maps relating to those units entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources

System Cape Fear Unit, NC–07P’’ and dated May 5, 2004.

(b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep

the maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for

inspection in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the

Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,367-01

EX PARTE MICHAEL D. BAXLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1476368-A IN THE 176 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

aggravated assault - family member and sentenced to imprisonment for fifteen years. 

The trial court signed an order designating issues on December 3, 2018. After 180 days from

the day the writ application was served on the State, the writ application was forwarded to this Court.

TEX. R. APP. P. 73.5. 

We remand this application to the 176 District Court of Harris County to allow the trial th

judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 23, 2019

Do not publish
NAC Aeronautics Committee Internal Agenda
 

Thursday, October 13, 2011
 

NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC
 

(ARMD Conference Room 6B42)
 

Thursday, October 13 (Sessions are public except as noted)
 

8:00 am to 8:10 am Welcome and announcements
 

8:10 am to 10:00 am Green Aviation Research Portfolio
 

10:00 am to 10:15 am Break
 

10:15 am to 11:00 am Green Aviation Research Portfolio (cont.)
 

11:30 am to 12:30 pm  Lunch (non­public)

12:30 pm to 2:00 pm Interagency Relationships for Alternative Fuels 

Research

2:00 pm to 2:30 pm UAS Subcommittee Status
 

2:30 pm to 2:45 pm Break
 

2:45 pm to 3:30 pm 2012 Planning discussion
 

3:30 pm to 4:45 pm Committee Deliberations
 

4:45 pm to 5:00 pm Closing Remarks and Public Comment Period