alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Apollo 11 Moonwalk

AS11-40-5875 (20 July 1969) -- Astronaut Edwin E. Aldrin Jr., lunar module pilot of the first lunar landing mission, poses for a photograph beside the deployed United States flag during an Apollo 11 extravehicular activity (EVA) on the lunar surface. The Lunar Module (LM) is on the left, and the footprints of the astronauts are clearly visible.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/apollo-11-moonwalk/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x1026pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land in Washoe 

County, Nevada, to the Board of Regents of the University and Community College System of Nevada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain 

land in Washoe County, Nevada, to the Board of Regents 

of the University and Community College System of Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dandini Research Park 

5 Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 
2

•S 1826 IS 

1 (1) BOARD OF REGENTS.—The term ‘‘Board of 

2 Regents’’ means the Board of Regents of the Uni3 versity and Community College System of Nevada. 

4 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

5 the Secretary of the Interior. 

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE UNIVERSITY AND COMMU7 NITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEVADA. 

8 (a) CONVEYANCE.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey 

10 to the Board of Regents, without consideration, all 

11 right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

12 to the approximately 467 acres of land located in 

13 Washoe County, Nevada, patented to the University 

14 of Nevada under the Act of June 14, 1926 (com15 monly known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Pur16 poses Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.), and described 

17 in paragraph (2). 

18 (2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred 

19 to in paragraph (1) is—

20 (A) the parcel of land consisting of ap21 proximately 309.11 acres and more particularly 

22 described as T. 20 N., R. 19 E., Sec. 25, lots 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 11, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SW1 23 ⁄4, 

24 Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada; and 
3

•S 1826 IS 

1 (B) the parcel of land consisting of ap2 proximately 158.22 acres and more particularly 

3 described as T. 20 N., R. 19 E., Sec. 25, lots 

6 and 7, SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, NW1⁄4SE1 4 ⁄4, Mount Dia5 blo Meridian, Nevada. 

6 (b) COSTS.—The Board of Regents shall pay to the 

7 United States an amount equal to the costs of the Sec8 retary associated with the conveyance under subsection 

9 (a)(1). 

10 (c) CONDITIONS.—If the Board of Regents sells any 

11 portion of the land conveyed to the Board of Regents 

12 under subsection (a)(1)—

13 (1) the amount of consideration for the sale 

14 shall reflect fair market value, as determined by an 

15 appraisal; and 

16 (2) the Board of Regents shall pay to the Sec17 retary an amount equal to the net proceeds of the 

18 sale, for use by the Director of the Bureau of Land 

19 Management in the State of Nevada, without further 

20 appropriation.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               391,628
<SECURITIES>                                         2,831,731
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       28,247,400<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           28,056,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         28,247,400<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     94,631<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     133,594<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (555,067)<F5>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (10.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Included in Total Assets is Investments in Local Limited  Partnerships of
$24,727,127,  Restricted cash of $269,215 and Other assets of $27,699.
<F2>Included in Total Liabilities and Equity is Accounts payable to affiliates
of $141,833 and Accounts  payable and accrued expenses of $49,432.
<F3>Total revenue includes Investment of $43,995 and Other of $50,636.
<F4>Included in Other Expenses is Asset management fees of $73,888, General and
administrative  of $51,660 and Amortization of $8,046.
<F5>Net loss reflects Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships of
$516,104.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 444 

Encouraging the courts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 

Ireland to allow Charles William Gard and Constance Rhoda Keely 

Yates to pursue innovative medical care for their son. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging the courts of the United Kingdom of Great 

Britain and Northern Ireland to allow Charles William 

Gard and Constance Rhoda Keely Yates to pursue innovative medical care for their son. 

Whereas human life is sacred and deserving of care and preservation at all stages of development; 

Whereas a baby is not a statistic to be managed but rather 

a life, to be supported in every way possible; 

Whereas an experimental treatment exists in the United 

States that could prolong the life of Charles Matthew 

William Gard (‘‘Charlie’’); 

Whereas a hospital in the United States has offered to admit 

Charlie for such treatment; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 444 IH 

Whereas President Donald J. Trump, moved by Charlie’s 

struggle, has extended a hand of help to his parents from 

the United States; and 

Whereas parents retain an inherent right to protect and provide for their children, and to seek out all resources and 

services available to secure life-saving treatments, wherever they may be found, for their children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the courts of the United Kingdom of 

2 Great Britain and Northern Island and the European 

3 Court of Human Rights should allow Charles William 

4 Gard and Constance Rhoda Keely Yates to pursue innova5 tive medical care for their son, Charles Matthew William 

6 Gard (‘‘Charlie’’), in any country where such care may be 

7 available, in order to give Charlie the chance to be cured 

8 in accordance with his parents’ wishes. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILE AS PART OF
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000892533
<NAME> HAGGAR CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,987
<INVENTORY>                                     95,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,694
<PP&E>                                         139,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           857
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,956
<SALES>                                        205,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,057
<CGS>                                          137,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (886)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Peter Lewis et al. *v.*Washington Watson et al.

Appeal and Error — Final Judgment.

Where, by the decree of the chancellor, the judgment is left open to a contingency or act to be performed by one of the litigants, it is not such a final judgment as will give the appellate court jurisdiction upon appeal.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

*Demhiiz &*Speed, for Appellants.

*Harrison &*Bermett, for Appellees.

June 1, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters :

The purposes for which the action in equity was brought were to have defined what are the powers and duties of the trustees under the respective deeds of trust by which the church property is held, and to secure the true beneficiaries therein, in the undisturbed enjoyment of those rights, by requiring said trustees to execute the trusts. By the judgment, it is true, the church property is ordered to be delivered over as a place of worship to those of the congregation who hold membership “ in the Methodist Episcopal Church South, if the Methodist Episcopal Church shall take charge thereof ” looking to this contingency or condition in the judgment,, and the concluding sentence by which the chancellor retains the cause, and reserves the power “ to make any other order, or appropriate judgment.” We are satisfied that said judgment is not final, and over which this court cannot, therefore, take jurisdiction.

The chancellor may at any time change or modify his judgment, and for the redress of any grievances growing out of this controversy his court is the proper tribunal to apply to, and where we must assume all proper relief will be granted. And this court must wait until that door is finally closed before its duty begins. Wherefore, the original and cross-appeals are both dismissed.
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=7388
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 6, 2012

Before

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

Nos. 08

‐ 1879 & 08

‐ 1880

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

AMIR HOSSEINI and HOSSEIN OBAEI,

Defendants

‐ Appellants

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 05 CR 254

Milton I. Shadur,

Judge

.

O R D E R

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion dated May 7, 2012, shall be amended as

follows:

The last paragraph on page 6 and the following, full paragraph on page 7 are

amended to read:

This argument about the meaning of “proceeds” in the money

‐ laundering

statute is new on appeal. To preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, a

defendant must move for a judgment of acquittal in the trial court. United States v.

Tavarez

, 626 F.3d 902, 906 (7th Cir. 2010). Both defendants did so here; they moved

for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

at the close of the government’s case, and they renewed their motions at the close of

evidence and again after the verdict. But they never raised the “proceeds” issue;Nos. 08

‐ 1879 & 08

‐ 1880 Page 2

instead, their Rule 29 motions identified other grounds for acquittal. For example,

they argued that selling cars to drug dealers was not evidence of a RICO enterprise

or a RICO or money

‐ laundering conspiracy. Obaei also argued that the evidence was

insufficient to find him guilty of aiding and abetting a drug conspiracy.

As a general matter, and unlike its analogue in the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure does not require

specificity when moving for a judgment of acquittal. Compare F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 29

with F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 50(a)(2) (motions for judgment as a matter of law “must specify

the judgment sought and the law and facts that entitle the movant to the judgment”).

But we have held that a defendant’s choice to raise specific arguments and omit

others in a Rule 29 motion has consequences on appeal. We have held that when a

defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence by motion for judgment of

acquittal and makes specific arguments in support of that motion, any arguments

omitted are thereby forfeited. See United States v. Groves

, 470 F.3d 311, 324 (7th Cir.

2006) (citing United States v. Moore

, 363 F.3d 631, 637 (7th Cir. 2004) (“[W]hen

. . . a

[Rule 29] motion raises specific arguments, any claims not presented in the motion

are waived.”), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Young v. United States

, 543 U.S. 1100

(2005)). We might alternatively construe the “proceeds” argument as a claim of

instructional error. But neither defendant raised the definition of “proceeds” as a

ground of objection to the jury instructions.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 418 

Urging the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the cultural significance 

of Rib Mountain by adding it to the National Register of Historic Places. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, and Mr. KIND) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the cultural 

significance of Rib Mountain by adding it to the National 

Register of Historic Places. 

Whereas Paul Bunyan is a larger-than-life folk hero who embodies the frontier spirit, might, the willingness to work 

hard, and the resolve to overcome all obstacles; 

Whereas reliable documentation establishes that the earliest 

story about Paul Bunyan was told north of Tomahawk, 

Wisconsin; 

Whereas this evidence suggests that Wisconsin’s claim that it 

is the birthplace of Paul Bunyan is superior to claims 

from other States; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 418 IH 

Whereas Paul Bunyan has been the subject of countless literary compositions, musical pieces, commercial works, 

and theatrical productions; 

Whereas local legend states that the ‘‘ribs’’ in Rib Mountain, 

Wisconsin, denote that the mountain is the burial site of 

Paul Bunyan; 

Whereas Rib Mountain is nearly 4 miles long and peaks at 

1,924 feet above sea level and 670 feet above the local 

terrain, making it the highest natural feature in North 

Central Wisconsin and one of the highest points in the 

entire State of Wisconsin; 

Whereas Rib Mountain is home to the Granite Peak Ski 

Area, one of the first ski areas in North America, where 

thousands of visitors come annually to ski or snowboard; 

Whereas Rib Mountain State Park, situated on Rib Mountain, is over 1,500 acres and boasts a well-maintained 

network of hiking and nature trails with breathtaking 

views; and 

Whereas Rib Mountain State Park attracts visitors from the 

local community as well as from across the State and the 

country: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) affirms the importance of Rib Mountain to 

3 the culture and economy of Wisconsin; 

4 (2) recognizes the legend of Paul Bunyan as 

5 the embodiment of the frontier spirit; and 

6 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Interior 

7 recognize the legendary burial site of Paul Bunyan 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 418 IH 

1 by adding Rib Mountain to the National Register of 

2 Historic Places. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                  SCHEDULE TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT UNDER
          HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AND
                         EVA INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION HOLDER                    NUMBER OF SHARES                 DATE OF GRANT
-------------                    ----------------               ----------------
<S>                                   <C>                       <C>
George M. Dickens, Jr.                 6,886                    January 22, 2001
Barry J. Kulpa                        52,690                    January 22, 2001
Carl A. Liliequist                    19,292                    January 22, 2001
Kenneth E. Thompson                    2,635                    January 22, 2001
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
     the quarterly period ended April 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: June 7, 2006                     /s/ Sandra B. Cochran
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Sandra B. Cochran
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       31
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel, Review R01.
    Date: November 3, 2010.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Inst. of Dental & Craniofacial 
Research, NIH, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4809. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc1cdded5f3c7c9c0c0d5ecc2c5c482cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1aca0b3b89eaaa4adadb881afa8a9efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the intramural research review cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 26, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-27572 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>