alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Patterson, Assignee, *v.*Graves.

In a suit on a promissory note by an assignee against the maker, the declaration alleged that the promise was to pay to the order of certain persons trading under the name of *W.*and *R. P. Resor,*(but by mistake written on the face of the note *W. R.*and *P, Resor,*meaning, however, the said *IV,*and *R. P. Resor;)*that *TV.*and *R. P. Resor*indorsed the note, &c. *Held,*that the note, though it purported to be payable to *TV. R.*and *P. Resor,*was not objectionable as evidence on the ground of variance.

*Tuesday, June*29.

ERROR to the *Montgomery*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

The declaration alleges that the defendant below made his promissory note, and thereby “ promised to pay to the order of certain persons, trading and doing business by the name and description of *W.*and *R. P. Resor,*(but by mistake written on the face of said note *W. R.*and *P.*Resor, meaning, however, the said *W.*and *R. P. Resor,”)*&c.; that *W.*and *R. P. Resor*indorsed the note to *Tipton*and *Patterson,*who indorsed it to the plaintiff Plea, general issue. On the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence a note purporting to be executed by the defendant, payable to *W. R.*and *P. Resor,*indorsed by *W.*and *R. P. Resor*to *Tipton*and *Patterson,*and by them to the plaintiff. The defendant objected to the admissibility of the note, and the Court rejected it. Judgment for the defendant.

We think the Circuit Court committed an error in excluding the evidence. There was no variance between the note described in the declaration, and that produced on the trial. It is competent for the holder of a promissory note, or other instrument, to declare upon it as a promise made to himself, in a name different from his own, and to prove that he was the person intended. *Willis*v. *Barrett,*2 Stark. *29*.—Afri*can Soc.*v. *Varick,*13 Johns. 38. See, also, *Lasselle*v. *594*Hewson,*and *Taylor*v. *Coquillard,*decided in this Court, May term, 1839. The same principle is recognized in *Williamson*v. *Johnson,*1 B. & C. 146. The instrument in which the mistake occurs is, of course, legal evidence, whether it be sued, on by the payee, or by another person to’ whom it has been transferred.

*W. Wright,*for the plaintiff.

*R. C. Gregory,*for'the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to May 19, 2020 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 19

- 825 Erpelding v. Southall

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
- Explore NASA’s History
- NASA History Office
- Publications and Resources   - NASA History Series
  - News and Notes
  - Aeronautics and Space Report of the President
  - Oral Histories
  - Research Resources
- NASA Archives

# 							Historical Studies						

						in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight					

**Edited by Steven J. Dick**

This volume presents a series of in-depth studies on the mutual interaction of space exploration and society—part of a larger need to understand the relationships between science, technology, and society. After beginning with a study of public attitudes toward space over time, it then moves on to specific case studies of potential “spinoffs” from NASA’s space program in the areas of medical technology, integrated circuits, and the multibillion-dollar industry today known as MEMS (microelectromechanical systems). These studies explicitly raise the difficult questions of what can be considered spinoff and how much of any particular claimed spinoff can be attributed to NASA. Beyond spinoffs, the final part of the volume considers broader issues of space and society, including the controversy over the use of nuclear components in spacecraft, the relationship between NASA and the environment, the impact of applications satellites, and the impact of the Apollo program. Space exploration has also spawned entirely new disciplines, including astrogeology, astrochemistry, and even astrotheology. The final chapter explores the budding discipline of astrosociology.

**NASA SP-2015-4803**

## 				Download the e-Book			

## Fixed Layout

PDF format (3.6 MB)

## e-Book Readers

EPUB format (4.8 MB)

## More History Publications

Explore more titles in NASA's History Series.

				All NASA History Publications                			

Origins of 21st-Century Space TravelPsychology of Space Exploration50 Years of Solar System Exploration: Historical PerspectivesArchaeology, Anthropology, and Interstellar Communication
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




*On
      March 21, 2003, Medi-Hut terminated the employment of its four senior officers
      due to corporate mismanagement in the form of accounting irregularities and
      securities fraud during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2002 and 2001. At
      the
      time of their termination, all of these former officers were the subject of
      an
      investigation by the United States Department of Justice and three were subject
      to an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. On August 19,
      2003, as a result of the United States Department of Justice investigation,
      three of the former officers pled guilty to conspiring to inflate the revenue
      and earnings of the Company and for lying to investigators and the fourth former
      officer pled guilty to obstruction of justice. Also on August 19, 2003, the
      former officers who were under investigation by the Securities and Exchange
      Commission agreed to a consent decree with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission. As a result of the actions of the former officers of Medi-Hut,
      certain portions of this report have been omitted where the information was
      incomplete or could not be adequately verified by the Company’s current
      management and/or the Company’s independent auditors. Consequently, the
      Company’s current Chief Executive Officer is unable to include the certification
      required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Proposed subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY:

This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the European Atomic Energy Community.

This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 1,470,588.2 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride (68.00% U), 1,000,000 kg of which is uranium, from Areva Resources Canada, Inc. (Areva Resources) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to Eurodif Production in Pierrelatte, France. The material, which is currently located at Areva Resources, will be transferred to Eurodif Production for enrichment and use as fuel in civilian nuclear power programs in the United States and France. The material was originally obtained by Areva Resources from the Feed Component Substitution Implementing Contract.

In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice.

Dated: October 1, 2010.

For the Department of Energy.

Thomas P. D'Agostino,

Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-27500 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Medina International Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
I, Daniel Medina, President of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Daniel Medina
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Daniel Medina, President

Dated:  August 8, 2005
R. G.

,

Appellant,

v.

B. A.

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3897

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 17, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Terrance R. Ketchel , Judge

.

R. G., pro se

, Appellant.

Melissa Posey Furman of Furman & Furman Attorney, LLP, Loxley, AL , for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# Sitemap

## July 13, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 07
- July 13, 2010

            - NASA Selects Student Experiments For International Space Station
            - Farewell Lutetia
            - Wheel Installation
            - New Wheels
            - Wheels Spinning
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARL BUXTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 220 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/    LARRY A.
GOLDSTONE            
|Larry A. Goldstone                   
|President and Chief Operating Officer



November 7, 2005
Order entered October 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00703-CV

JASON MARTINEZ AND HOLLY WOODARD MARTINEZ, Appellants

V.

ICAN FINANCIAL, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-09112

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal. On September 21, 2021, we ordered the 

appeal submitted without the reporter’s record and further ordered appellants to file 

their brief no later than October 11, 2021. To date, however, the brief has not been 

filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellants to file their brief no later than 

November 1, 2021. We caution appellants that failure to file the brief may result

in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 

42.3(b),(c).

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
April __, 2020




The undersigned (the “Employee”) is participating in Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) and its various subsidiaries’ global cost reduction program (the “Program”) instituted in connection with economic downturn associated with the global coronavirus pandemic.  As part of that Program, the Employee’s base salary is being temporarily reduced by 20% during the period commencing April 27, 2020 through August 30, 2020 (the “Temporary Salary Reduction”).  This letter agreement serves to clarify the effect of the Temporary Salary Reduction on various arrangements between the Employee and the Company. 


The Employee and the Company are party to [___________] (the “Executive Agreement”).  Given the temporary nature of the Temporary Salary Reduction and the fact that a similar salary reduction is being implemented across the entire Axalta Leadership Team and other employees of the Company, the Employee consents to the Temporary Salary Reduction and agrees that the Temporary Salary Reduction shall not constitute “Good Reason” as defined in the Executive Agreement or as such term is used in any other agreement between the Employee and the Company, including the Retention Agreement, dated September 23, 2019, and [___________].  


In addition, when determining the “Base Amount,” as defined in the Executive Agreement, Employee and the Company agree that any temporary salary reduction, including the Temporary Salary Reduction, shall not be considered in the determination of the “Base Amount” and instead the Employee’s base salary in effect immediately prior to any temporary salary reduction shall be utilized in any calculations of “Base Amount.”  


This letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the Executive Agreement.


As confirmation of the above, please sign this letter in the space provided below and return an executed copy to the Company.  This letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one agreement.


AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS LTD.




By:                                 
Name:  
Title:  


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


[___________]




By:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 23, 2014

NO. 03-13-00831-CV

D. Houston, Inc. d/b/a Treasures, Appellant

v.

Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, and Sherry Cook, Administrator, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on November 12, 2013. D. 

Houston, Inc. d/b/a Treasures has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the 

motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the 

motion and dismisses the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and the court below.
#### EVELYN COHEN, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, APPELLANT.

Submitted October 27, 1944

Decided February 2, 1945.

For the appellant, *Charles Frankel*and *Joseph F. Mat lice.*

For the respondent, *Nelson Ehrlich*and *Theodore D. Parsons.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The Circuit Court found that the respondent, “as a member of the Asbury Park Police Department, was entitled to an annual salary of $2,700 from June 16th, 1936, to June 22d, 1943, whereas plaintiff stated in her complaint that she received annually from the defendant the sum of $1,040. (Actually, she only received $960 annually.) The difference between $2,700 and $1,040 is $1,660. From June 16th, 1936, to June 16th, 1943, the amount recoverable is $11,620. From June 16th, 1943, to June 22d, 1943, inclusive, the plaintiff is entitled to $4.61 extra, daily, for a period of seven days, which comes to the sum of $32.27. Therefore, the total verdict is for $11,662.27.”

The case was brought and tried on the theory that the plaintiff had become a police officer of the City of Asbury Park without dishonesty or fraud on her part and was entitled to recover the compensation fixed by law for the services rendered by her. *Hoboken*v. Gear, 27 *N. J. L.*265; *Erwin*v. *Jersey*City, 60 *Id.*141; *McArt*v. Belleville, 97 *Id.*396.

*430The proofs abundantly demonstrate the fact that the respondent served continuously as a police officer and was protected under *R. S.*40 :47-5, 6; *Albert*v. Caldwell, 123 *N. J. L.*266. An ordinance fixed a police officer’s pay at $2,700 per year.

The statutes of the state permitted her appointment. *B. 8.*40:46-3. She served and was entitled to the compensation fixed by ordinance.

*R. S.*1:1 — 2, provides as follows: “Number; gender. Whenever, in describing or referring to any person, party, matter or thing, any word importing the singular number or masculine gender is used, the same shall be understood to include and to apply to several persons or parties as well as to one person or party and to females as well as males, and to bodies corporate as well as individuals, and to several matters and things as well as one matter or thing.” *Ghesquier*v. *Fire and Police, &c.,*Paterson, 117 *N. J. L.*327.

A subsequent resolution fixing respondent’s compensation at $1,500 per year had no effect whatever upon the previous ordinance.

There is no evidence whatever that there had been a waiver of any rights to compensation; in fact, the contrary appears. Nor does there appear to be an estoppel.

We have carefully examined all the appellant’s other points and find them to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, IPerskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Eaeeertt, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

================================================================================
     COMMON STOCK        [LOGO OF IMPRESSE CORPORATION]         COMMON STOCK

        NUMBER                                                     SHARES


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE                     SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
IN                                                   DEFINITIONS AND A STATEMENT
                                                     AS TO THE RIGHTS,
                                                     PREFERENCES, PRIVILEGES AND
                                                     RESTRITIONS ON SHARES

                                                            CUSIP

      THIS CERTIFIES THAT



      IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF


           FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK,
                        $.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF

                           IMPRESSE CORPORATION

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by a Transfer
Agent and registered by the Registrar.
  WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
  of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

         /s/ Sanjai Bijawat         [CORPORATE SEAL          /s/ Nimish Mehta
                               OF IMPRESSE CORPORATION]

         CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                              PRESIDENT AND
                                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                         COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

                                                    TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
                         BY /s/
                                                            AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

================================================================================
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Martek Biosciences
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof: a) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
January 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Peter L. Buzy Peter L. Buzy
Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences
Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Sitemap

## January 17, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 01
- January 17, 2011

            - Montana Students Pick Winning Names for Moon Craft