alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### P. Rothchild *v.*J. P. Floyd.

Instructions — Undue Importance Given Isolated Fact.

There is great danger of giving undue importance to isolated facts by singling them out and giving a special instruction on them.

APPEAL PROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

June 11, 1866.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams:

The first instruction asked for by plaintiff and refused by the court should have been given; the instruction given the defendant virtually directs the jury to allow defendant his charge for board, without considering whether he was a tavern-keeper, entertainer of travelers for compensation, or whether any contract, express or implied, existed between plaintiff and defendant that he should be compensated for such entertainment, and is inconsistent with the statute relative to such cases; this instruction should have been refused for this reason. The evidence had been permitted to go to the jury for what occurred between the parties at the time the store was removed, and, of course, was before them for consideration, yet there is great danger of giving undue importance to an isolated fact by singling it out and giving a special instruction on it, and whilst a general instruction that all the evidence allowed to go to them was to be considered, yet we would not be' inclined to say the court improperly refused the second instruction asked for by the plaintiff; it should, at least,, be more general.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial.
# STS-69

These five NASA astronauts were the crew members for the STS-69 mission that launched aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavour September...

STS069-S-024 (7 September 1995) --- Trees and shrubs frame the liftoff phase of the Space Shuttle Endeavour as it begins...

STS069-S-023 (7 September 1995) --- Liftoff of the Space Shuttle Endeavour from Launch Pad 39A occurred at 11:09:00:52 a.m. (EDT),...

STS069-S-022 (7 September 1995) --- Marsh driftwood and Florida shrubbery frame the liftoff phase of the Space Shuttle Endeavour as...

STS069-S-019 (7 September 1995) --- Florida shrubbery frames the liftoff phase of the Space Shuttle Endeavour as it begins the...

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- STS-69: Endeavour

STS069-715-086 (16 September 1995) --- Astronaut James S. Voss, payload commander, is pictured during the September 16, 1995, Extravehicular Activity...

STS069-714-046 (16 Sept. 1995) --- Astronaut Michael L. Gernhardt, STS-69 mission specialist, is pictured during the Sept. 16, 1995, Extravehicular...

STS069-715-050 (7-18 September 1995) --- The STS-69 crewmembers take a moment from a busy flight to pose for the traditional...

STS069-363-010 (7-18 September 1995) --- Astronaut Kenneth D. Cockrell, pilot, looks over a logbook on Space Shuttle Endeavour’s flight deck...

STS069-355-023 (7-18 September 1995) --- Astronauts David M. Walker (right), mission commander, and Michael L. Gernhardt, mission specialist, busy themselves...

STS069-732-048 (11 September 1995) --- Having earlier been released by the Space Shuttle Endeavour's Remote Manipulator System (RMS), the Wake...
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Erasmo MARTINEZ-HERRERA, Appellant.

No. 03-1774.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 15, 2003.

Decided Sept. 17, 2003.

Michael Mills Hobart, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Erasmo Martinez-Herrera, pro se, Clarinda, IA, Nicholas Drees, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Erasmo Martinez-Herrera pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and the district court1 sentenced him to 41 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing Martinez-Herrera at the top of the applicable Guidelines range.

We reject counsel’s argument because we do not review the district court’s exercise of discretion in setting a sentence at the top of a properly determined Guidelines range. *See United States v. Smotherman,*326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam); *United States v. Woodrum,*959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam).

We have reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Ac*687eordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01
 
  a)
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By
    
    /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.Henry Linsert, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              13,324
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      154,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,154
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   171,372
<PP&E>                                             126,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                      88,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     299,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              163,258
<BONDS>                                             98,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            14,852
<OTHER-SE>                                          21,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       299,415
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   456,236
<CGS>                                              377,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      436,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     22,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12,118
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
#### Carter *v.*Berkshire.

In debt against *A.*and *B.,*the process was returned served on the former and “not found ” as to the latter. *Held,*that the plaintiff, to recover against *A.,*must have a joint cause of action against him and *B.*

In such case, a plea of set-off by *A.*of a debt due to him alone, or of a debt due to *B.*alone, from the plaintiff, is bad on demurrer; but it is not a nullity, nor is it so objectionable that it should be set aside on motion.

If the plaintiff in a justice’s Court having obtained judgment, appeal, and fail to recover at least five dollars more than the justice’s judgment, the appellee will be entitled to costs.

ERROR to the *Henry*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of debt commenced by *Garter*against *John D. Fooshee*and *Ralph Berkshire,*before a justice of the peace. The process was served on *Berkshire*and returned “not found” as to *Fooshee.*The suit was founded on a note, executed by both the defendants, for the sum of thirty-six dollars and seventy-five cents. Judgment by the justice against *Berkshire*for nine dollars and ninety cents and costs. The plaintiff appealed.

In the Circuit Court, the plaintiff' moved to set aside one of *Berkshire’s*pleas. This plea states that the note was given to the plaintiff by *Fooshee,*and *Berkshire*as his surety; that the plaintiff owed *Fooshee*a certain sum for goods sold and delivered, work and labour, &c. The motion was overruled. Judgment in the Circuit Court for the plaintiff for three dollars and the costs before the justice, and judgment for the defendant for the costs in the Circuit Court.

The plaintiff below is the plaintiff in error.

To support this suit, wdiich is brought against *Fooshee*and *Berkshire,*the plaintiff must have a cause of action against both, though *Berkshire*alone was served with process. *Taylor*v. *Claypool,*5 Blackf. 557. It follows that the defendant, *Berkshire,*could not set off a debt due to him alone, or a debt due to *Fooshee*alone, from the plaintiff. The only debt that can be set off in such action, is a debt due from the plaintiff to *Fooshee*and *Berkshire*jointly. The plea, therefore, is no doubt bad, and might have been demurred to; but still it is not a nullity, nor is it so objectionable that it could be set aside on motion.

*194Cf. *H.*Test, for the plaintiff.

*S. W. Parker,*for the defendant.

The judgment against the plaintiff for costs is right, as he did not recover at least five dollars more than the judgment appealed from. R. S. 1843, p. 892.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2099

ROBERT L. PEELER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-1123) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Robert L. Peeler, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James D. McCoy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert L. Peeler, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who presided over his criminal trial. Our review of the record and thedistrict court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peeler v. Herlong , No. CA98-1123 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
www.nasa.gov    #artemis
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1817 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1817

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include influenza 
          vaccines in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 2003

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include influenza 
          vaccines in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVENUE MEASURE TO APPLY TO INFLUENZA VACCINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(M) Any vaccine against influenza.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to sales and uses beginning on July 1, 2004.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4132 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        before the date described in paragraph (1) for which delivery 
        is made on or after such date, the delivery date shall be 
        considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE NEW RADIO VENTURE, INC., 

doing business as KNUV 1190 AM - La 

Buena Onda (The Good Wave) and 

KNRV 1150 AM, formerly doing 

business as KNRC 1150 AM, 

 Debtor. 

__________________________________ 

NEW RADIO VENTURE, INC., 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORP., also 

known as Susquehanna Radio, Inc., 

 Defendant - Appellant, 

 and 

SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORP., also 

known as Susquehanna Radio, Inc., 

 Third-Party-Plaintiff - 

Counter-Defendant - Appellant, 

 v. 

CENTENNIAL INVESTMENT & 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., 

BAP No. CO-10-019 

Bankr. No. 08-24240 

Adv. No. 09-01080 

Chapter 11 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

April 13, 2010 

BAP Appeal No. 10-19 Docket No. 6 Filed: 04/13/2010 Page: 1 of 2
 Third-Party-Defendant - 

Counter-Claimant - Appellee. 

————————————————— 

 The matter before the Court is the Joint Stipulated Agreement For Dismissal Of 

Appeal Without Prejudice Under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2) (the “Motion to Dismiss”), 

filed April 13, 2010, by Plaintiff-Appellee New Radio Venture, Inc., Defendant-Third 

Party Plaintiff-Appellant Susquehanna Radio Corporation, and Third Party DefendantCounter-Claimant-Appellee Centennial Investment & Management Company, Inc. It is 

HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(1) The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 

(2) This appeal is DISMISSED. 

(3) The mandate shall issue forthwith and all deadlines previously set in 

this appeal are hereby terminated. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-19 Docket No. 6 Filed: 04/13/2010 Page: 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

s0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140860

ARCHIE SHARP, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140860 COA: 290154 Court of Claims: 08-000099-MK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas 77058

Biographical Data

S. CHRISTA CORRIGAN MCAULIFFE

TEACHER IN SPACE PARTICIPANT (DECEASED)

PERSONAL DATA: Born September 2, 1948 in Boston, Massachusetts.

She is survived by husband Steven and two children. Her listed

recreational interests included jogging, tennis, and volleyball.

EDUCATION: Graduated from Marian High School, Framingham,

Massachusetts, in 1966; received a bachelor of arts degree, Framingham

State College, 1970; and a masters degree in education, Bowie State

College, Bowie, Maryland, 1978.

ORGANIZATIONS: Board member, New Hampshire Council of Social

Studies; National Council of Social Studies; Concord Teachers

Association; New Hampshire Education Association; and the National

Education Association.

AWARDS: Posthumously awarded the Congressional Space Medal of Honor.

OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES: Member, Junior Service League; teacher, Christian Doctrine Classes, St. Peters Church; 

host family, A Better Chance Program (ABC), for inner-city students; and fundraiser for Concord Hospital and Concord 

YMCA.

EXPERIENCE:

1970-1971 Benjamin Foulois Junior High School, Morningside, Maryland. Teacher. American history, 8th 

grade.

1971-1978 Thomas Johnson Junior High School, Lanham, Maryland. Teacher. English and American history, 

8th grade and civics, 9th grade.

1978-1979 Rundlett Junior High School, Concord, New Hampshire. Teacher, 7th grade and American history, 

8th grade.

1980-1982 Bow Memorial (Middle) School, Bow, New Hampshire. Teacher. Social Studies, 9th grade.

1982-1985 Concord High School, Concord, New Hampshire. Teacher. Courses in economics, law, American 

history, and a course she developed entitled The American Woman, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade.

NASA EXPERIENCE: Christa McAuliffe was selected as the primary candidate for the NASA Teacher in Space Project 

on July 19, 1985. She was a payload specialist on STS 51-L which was launched from the Kennedy Space 

Center, Florida, at 11:38:00 EST on January 28, 1986. The crew on board the Orbiter Challenger included the 

spacecraft commander, Mr. F.R. Scobee, the pilot, Commander M.J. Smith (USN), three mission specialists, Dr. R.E. 

McNair, Lieutenant Colonel E.S. Onizuka (USAF), and Dr. J.A. Resnik, and fellow civilian payload specialist, Mr. 

G.B. Jarvis. The STS 51-L crew died on January 28, 1986 when Challenger exploded after launch.

APRIL 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-37584, 333-92467 and 333-62336) of Crossroads
Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated November 30, 2001 relating to
the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
November 30, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Austin, Texas
January 15, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 414 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 60
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 414

                          [Report No. 115-195]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the 
   Immigration and Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to 
   assistance by States, and political subdivision of States, in the 
    enforcement of Federal immigration laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2017

   Mr. Collins of Georgia, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the 
   Immigration and Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to 
   assistance by States, and political subdivision of States, in the 
    enforcement of Federal immigration laws, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the 
Immigration and Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to 
assistance by States, and political subdivision of States, in the 
enforcement of Federal immigration laws, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 60

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 414

                          [Report No. 115-195]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the 
   Immigration and Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to 
   assistance by States, and political subdivision of States, in the 
    enforcement of Federal immigration laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 27, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### LUTHER TOWNES v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JOHN R. FLETCHER v. CITY OF SALEM.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.