alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, George Mappin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ George Mappin
--------------------------
George Mappin
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10403 Conference Calendar

RONALD F. FISHMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GEORGE KILLINGER ET AL., Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CV-762-A

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronald F. Fishman, federal prisoner # 07680-054, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. He argues that his due process and equal protection rights were violated when the Federal Bureau of Prisons denied him admission into a residential drug treatment program pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e). He also avers that he had a protected liberty interest in obtaining admission into the program and that his removal from the program was retaliatory in nature.No. 98-10403 -2- We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and AFFIRM for the reason adopted by the district court. Fishman v. Killinger , No. 4:97-CV-762-A (N.D. Tex. March 25, 1998).
AFFIRMED.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 27, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a

Bernard Madoff,

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

JON & KATE PLUS 8; KATE

GOSSELIN; JON GOSSELIN; NADYA

SULEMAN; DEANNA HUMMEL;

STEVE NEILD; CARA GOSSELIN;

MADY GOSSELIN; HANNAH

GOSSELIN; LEAH GOSSELIN; JOEL

GOSSELIN; AADEN GOSSELIN;

ALEXIS GOSSELIN; COLLIN

GOSSELIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1284

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01593-ZLW 

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

Appellate Case: 10-1284 Document: 01018465241 Date Filed: 07/27/2010 Page: 1 
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1284 Document: 01018465241 Date Filed: 07/27/2010 Page: 2
#### Jefferson Hunt *v.*Lucy Grubbs.

Husband and Wife — Coverture — Title Bond — Wife’s Note.

Tbs wife sold land and executed her title bond *therefor, receiving*part of the consideration; afterward the contract was canceled and she executed her note to her grantee for the amount which she had received on the purchase price, taking up the title bond.

Suit having been brought on the note, she pleaded her coverture at the time of the execution of the note. *Reid,*that she will not be permitted to hold both the land and the consideration for it. If she is not bound on the note she is bound on her title bond.

APPEAL EROM BUTLER CIRCUIT COURT.

February 26, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

The appellee whilst sole executed to appellant he title bond for a small tract of land and received as part payment a mare.

*219The trade seems to have been mutually abandoned afterward and appellant did not get the land, subsequently appellee married and afterward separated from her husband and sued for a divorce whilst this suit was pending, and before she obtained a divorce she and appellant settled and she executed the note sued upon for $75, and took up the bond.

Suit being brought on the note she pleaded her coverture at the time it was executed, and thereupon appellant offered to file an amended petition, issue going on the original consideration, and stating the facts as above, also that there was an antenuptial contract between her and her husband, and insisting that by reason thereof that she was bound by the note.

The court permitted it to be filed as to the latter facts, but overruled it as to the first, and exception was taken to this ruling. Upon final hearing the suit was dismissed, and this appeal seeks a correction of the errors.

It is manifestly unjust that appellee should be permitted to keep both the land and the consideration for it, and if she is not bound on the note, it having been executed whilst she was married, without the consent or joining of her husband, still she was bound on her title bond, and should not be permitted to keep and treat it as satisfied, and refuse to pay the consideration for its cancelment.

The amended petition was highly proper and the court erred in rejecting it; she must either pay the note or answer her responsibilities on the covenants of the bond,, and in this view it matters but little whether by her antenuptial contract she retained the power to bind herself whilst married or not.

The judgment is reversed with directions to allow the amended petition to be filed and issue joined thereon, and for such other amendments as may be proper to correctly present the real issues, if offered within reasonable time.
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 


NASA IT Technologies Partnerships 


.with Other Federal Agencies and PubliclPrivate Opportunities 


2012-01-08 (ITIC-Ol) 


Recommendation: 


To enable NASA to gain experience on emerging leading-edge IT technologies such as: 


• Data-Intensive Cyberinfrastructure, 

• 100 Gbps Networking, 

• GPU Clusters, and 

• Hybrid HPC Architectures, 

the Council recommends that NASA aggressively pursue partnerships with other Federal 


agencies, specifically the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Department ofEnergy (DOE), 


as well as public/private opportunities. We believe joint agency program calls for end users to 


develop innovative applications will help keep NASA at the leading edge of capabilities and 


enable training ofNASA staff to support NASA researchers as these technologies become 


mainstream. 


Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 


NASA has fallen behind the leading edge, compared to other Federal agencies and international 


centers, in key emerging information and networking technologies. In a budget constrained 


fiscal environment, it is unlikely that NASA will be able to catch up by internal efforts. 


Partnering, as was historically done in HPCC, seems an attractive option. 


Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 


Within a few more years, the gap between NASA internally driven efforts and the U.S. and 


global best-of-breed will become a gap too large to bridge. This will severely undercut NASA's 


ability to make progress on a number of critical application arenas. 


NASA Response: 


NASA concurs. The Office ofthe Chief Information Officer concurs with the recommendation 


to aggressively pursue partnerships with other Federal agencies, as well as other public/private 


opportunities in order to gain experience in emerging leading-edge technologies. 


To this end: 

The NASA Chief Technologist Office (CTO) for IT has the responsibility for identifying 

and assessing emerging leading-edge technologies. Forming partnerships with other 

Federal agencies and public/private endeavors has been initiated and will continue to be 

pursued by the CTO for IT and his extended staff of CTOs at the various NASA Centers 

in order to gain experience with emerging technologies. 

Enclosure 
2 

The NASA Deputy Chief Infonnation Officer for IT Security is actively partnering with 

the Department ofHomeland Security. other Federal agencies, and industry to 

incorporate leading-edge technologies and practices into the NASA IT Security Program 

and will continue to evaluate partnering opportunities with others on an on-going basis.
#### John BURKS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

Nos. 03-3115, 03-3158.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Aug. 21, 2003.

ON MOTION

PROST, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

John Burks moves for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a replacement *57brief, with replacement brief attached. The Department of the Interior (DOI) has not responded.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted, the dismissal order is vacated, and the mandate is recalled. DOI’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing this order.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2010
                
                /s/
      Daniel J. DormanName: Daniel
      J. DormanTitle:  
      President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# Faces of SLS: Jeff LaDelfa

I greatly enjoy the effort required in the assembling and testing of components for space applications and their unique environments, like the Space Launch System (SLS). I find it exciting to witness a product that starts out as lines on a drawing or as a computer model on a screen become real, tangible hardware and to watch that hardware perform as it is intended to do.  

I’m a project engineer for Moog Inc. on a NASA research announcement to develop a flow control valve for the SLS advanced upper stage engine. This scalable flow control valve regulates the propellant that enters the engine’s combustion chamber. Through this initiative, we want to demonstrate a low-cost and reliable control valve that is capable of the extreme requirements for a high-performance upper stage engine.

One key element in this effort involved the use of additive manufacturing processes to produce the valve body. This can greatly reduce the cost and lead time to make complex parts. The testing program we conducted at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. It is exciting to think that eventually the work we’ve done on this project will contribute to the SLS, and deep-space missions.

Since joining Moog’s Space and Defense Group in Buffalo, New York, in 2008, I have been involved in the development, qualification and production of many different fluid- and motion-control devices. These devices are used on a broad array of space systems, including a small valve used on a mass spectrometer that determines carbon dioxide and oxygen content on the International Space Station.

I received my bachelor’s degree in aeronautics and astronautics engineering in 1993 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, and master’s degree in mechanical engineering in 1998 from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

As someone who grew up in the Buffalo area, I’ve always been a Buffalo Bills fan. Now that I am back in the area, I’m a season ticket holder. I enjoy the whole game-day experience — from the tailgate, to the game, to the postgame conversations and debates.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Hidden Figures

Crossword Puzzle

1 2

3

4

6

5

1 2

3

4

6

5

DOWN

2. He was the first American astronaut to orbit Earth in 1962.

5. She was promoted to lead the West Area Human Computer

 group, making her NACA's first black supervisor, and one of

 NACA's few female supervisors.

ACROSS

1. In 1958, she became NASA’s first black female engineer.

3. She calculated the path for Alan Shepard's Freedom 7 mission.

4. The untold story of three African-America, female

 mathematicians and engineer, who helped with the Space Race

 even as they dealt with inequalities at work.

6. This US President awarded her the Presidential Medal of

 Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor.

https://www.nasa.gov/modernfigures

YEK ANSWER 

N W DO

NN LE JOHNG . 2

N AUGHA V HY DOROT . 5

S OS ACR

NOS CK JA YRA M. 1

NOS NH JO E RIN HE TA K. 3

S URE ENFIG DDI H. 4

A OBAM KCARA B. 6

www.nasa.gov NP-2020-08-059-LaRC
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, John E. Calonico, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of iManage, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
            certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            Dated: March 26, 2003                      /s/ JOHN E. CALONICO, JR.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       John E. Calonico, Jr.
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**WARREN RESOURCES, INC.**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman F. Swanton, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    |   | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/   Norman F. Swanton         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Norman   F. Swanton             |   |
| *Chairman of the Board*         |   |
| *And   Chief Executive Officer* |   |
|                            |   |
| May 4,   2011              |   |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6105

DANIEL DRAPER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MS. BARNES, Warden; DR. ONAHA, Medical Doctor; MRS. RAMSEY, Medical 

Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (9:21-cv-00185-TMC)

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Draper, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Acting United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6105 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Draper appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 

action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 

403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court 

referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The 

magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint and advised Draper that failure 

to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of 

a district court order based upon the recommendation. Draper did not file objections, and 

the district court accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss the complaint. 

The district court subsequently issued a text order stating that it received notification that 

the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was mistakenly mailed to the incorrect

person and correctional facility. 

All parties must be served with and given an opportunity to object to the findings 

and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Here, the record 

establishes that Draper did not receive the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

before the district court issued its dismissal order, thus depriving Draper of his right to file 

objections. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s dismissal order; grant Draper’s 

motion to remand the case to the district court; and remand with instructions to serve the 

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation on Draper and to provide him with an 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6105 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

opportunity to file objections.∗

 We deny Draper’s motions to appoint counsel and to send 

an investigator to FCI Bennettsville. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

∗ Defendants do not oppose Draper’s motion to remand the case to the district court 

to allow Draper the opportunity to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6105 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
3 min read

# NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Launch Aboard Soyuz

### NASA

Oct 08, 2020

MEDIA ADVISORYM20-108

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credits: NASA**

A trio of space travelers is poised to launch to the International Space Station from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on Wednesday, Oct. 14. NASA Television will provide comprehensive coverage of launch and docking.

Kate Rubins of NASA and Sergey Ryzhikov and Sergey Kud-Sverchkov of the Russian space agency Roscosmos are preparing to launch aboard the Soyuz MS-17 spacecraft Wednesday, Oct. 14, at 1:45 a.m. EDT (10:45 a.m. Kazakhstan time) on a two-orbit, three-hour journey to dock to the station’s Rassvet module for the start of a six-month mission on the orbital outpost.

Launch coverage on NASA Television will begin at 12:45 a.m. It will be the second flight for Rubins and Ryzhikov and the first for Kud-Sverchkov.

After their fast-track transit, the new crew members will dock to the station at 4:52 a.m. NASA TV coverage of rendezvous and docking will begin at 4 a.m. They will join Expedition 63 Commander Chris Cassidy of NASA and Roscosmos cosmonauts Anatoly Ivanishin and Ivan Vagner, who have been aboard the complex since April.

Less than two hours after docking, hatches between the newly arrived Soyuz spacecraft and the station will open, and the six crew members will greet each other. NASA TV coverage of the hatch opening will begin at 6 a.m. Cassidy, Ivanishin, and Vagner are scheduled to depart the space station and land on Earth on the steppe of Kazakhstan Wednesday, Oct. 21, U.S. time, in the Soyuz MS-16 spacecraft that brought them to the station on April 9.

A change of command ceremony is scheduled on Tuesday, Oct. 20. Although launching as part of the Expedition 63 crew, Rubins, Ryzhikov, and Kud-Sverchkov will become the Expedition 64 crew under Ryzhikov’s command upon the departure of Cassidy, Ivanishin, and Vagner.

The crew members of Expedition 64 will continue work on hundreds of experiments in biology, biotechnology, physical science, and Earth science aboard the International Space Station, humanity’s only permanently occupied microgravity laboratory.

Expedition 64 will also be onboard for the planned arrival of NASA’s SpaceX Crew-1 mission on Nov. 1, bringing NASA astronauts Mike Hopkins, Victor Glover, Shannon Walker, and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency astronaut Soichi Noguchi to the space station aboard the Crew Dragon vehicle. This first operational mission of the Crew Dragon is scheduled to launch to the station Oct. 31, following a successful Demo-2 mission earlier this year.

Get breaking news, images, and features from the station on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and NASA’s website.

Check out the full NASA TV schedule and video streaming information at:

**https://www.nasa.gov/nasatv**

-end-

Stephanie SchierholzHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100stephanie.schierholz@nasa.govDan HuotJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111daniel.g.huot@nasa.gov