alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed November 15, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-2054

Lower Tribunal No. 18-25610

________________

Antonio Scognamillo,

Appellant,

vs.

Tiffany Jamison, 

f/k/a Tiffany Scognamillo,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jason E. 

Dimitris, Judge.

Antonio Scognamillo, in proper person.

Marti Goldstein, P.A., and Marti Goldstein, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ. 

GORDO, J.
2

Antonio Scognamillo (“the Father”) appeals a final judgment of 

dissolution of marriage to his former wife, Tiffany Scognamillo (“the Mother”). 

We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). For the following 

reasons, we affirm. 

In October 2018, the Mother filed a petition for dissolution marriage. A 

trial was held on the issues raised in the petition and the trial court entered 

a final judgment in November 2022. The Father did not file a motion for 

rehearing. 

The Father alleges various errors on appeal all related to the trial 

court’s factual findings. “[W]here an error by the court appears for the first 

time on the face of a final order, a party must alert the court of the error via 

a motion for rehearing or some other appropriate motion in order to preserve 

it for appeal.” Williams v. Williams, 152 So. 3d 702, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). 

Here, any arguments as to the trial court’s factual findings are not preserved 

for appeal. The Father was required to alert the trial court of any alleged 

error via a motion for rehearing or some other appropriate motion in order to 

preserve his arguments for appellate review and did not do so. See Moody 

v. Newton, 264 So. 3d 292, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (“Because the alleged 

error first appeared in the final judgment, [the] Former [spouse] was required 

to bring this matter to the lower court’s attention in a motion for rehearing.”). 
3

Equally fatal to the instant appeal is the lack of a transcript. “In the absence 

of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally 

erroneous must be affirmed.” Haddad v. Khan, 54 So. 3d 524, 525 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2010). Finding no fundamental error on the face of the trial court’s 

order, we affirm as the Father failed to meet his burden to demonstrate 

reversible error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court 

has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to 

demonstrate error.”). 

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMERY SOOS, Sr.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 15

- 56663

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 09027

- GW

- AGR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Emery Soos, Sr., appeals pro se from the d istrict court’s judgment

dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Soos fails to challenge the district court’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 56663

dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and therefore he has

waived such a challenge

. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999)

(“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed

waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not

manufacture arguments for an appellant . . . .”)

.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John E. Yetter, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 of Derma
Sciences, Inc. (the “Form 10-Q”) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.





Dated:  May
      12, 2010
              /s/ John E. YetterJohn
      E. Yetter, CPAVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANICAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/96
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          56,104                  56,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,975                  34,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,892                   2,892
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,848                 103,848
<PP&E>                                          21,036                  21,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,767                   6,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,609                 118,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,514                  12,514
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        81,127                  81,127
<OTHER-SE>                                        (766)                   (766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,609                 118,609
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,023                  37,578
<CGS>                                            5,173                   8,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,857                  34,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (659)                 (1,342)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    825                   4,692
<INCOME-TAX>                                       291                   1,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                534                   2,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       534                   2,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                     .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                     .08
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

# **CHIEF ACCOUNTINGOFFICER**

##### **PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

##### ** **

I, John W. Feray, Chief Accounting Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                              | /s/ John W. Feray              |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                              | John W. Feray                  |   |
|                              | Chief Accounting Officer       |   |
| Date:  February 9, 2005 | (principal accounting officer) |   |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-113224, and 333-51524, on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-129860 on form S-3 of our reports dated March 9, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Pacific Financial Corporation and Subsidiary and to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Financial Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

March 9, 2007
#### N. B. Chism *v.*R. H. Chism.

Sale of Expectancy.

A sale of expectancy may be constructively fraudulent, but when it is shown to be fair and for a full consideration it is not voidable by the recipient of the consideration.

Judgment — Legalizing Contract.

The confirmation by the judgment of the Divorcing Court, recognizing and legalizing a contract, makes it conclusively binding on both parties.

*11APPEAR EROM MONROE CIRCUIT COURT.

*A. J.*Adams, *Leslie & Botls, for appellant.*

*J. W.*Bitter, *for appellee.*

February 26, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court bt

Judge Robinson:

Independently of the contemplated divorce, the maintenance of the nine infant children by Mrs. Chism was a sufficient consideration for the renunciation by the appellant, N. B. Chism, of his -contingent right as heir or distributee in the real or personal estate •of his wife and of her children. A sale of an expectancy may be •constructively fraudulent, but, when shown to be fair and for a full consideration, may not be voidable in a court of equity by the recipient of the consideration. Nor will a court of equity help him to avoid the sale on the ground that the purchaser was a married woman, and especially after the lapse of twenty years, during the whole of which time he was receiving the consideration since -■she became discovert, and whereby he confirmed the contract.

Moreover, the confirmation by the judgment of the Divorcing •Court, recognizing and legalizing the contract, made it conclusively binding on both parties, and consequently the appellant is not entitled, either as heir or distributee, to any portion of the estate of the two deceased sons of himself and their mother.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing his petition is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
|   



|Registrant.
|-----------



|/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(principal executive officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Sandra L. SagerSandra L. Sager, CPAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|August 14, 2008
|---------------

38

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
P. Story, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard P. Story
------------------------
Richard P. Story
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1757

AN ACT

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize

appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the

Performing Arts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1757 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

2 THE JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER.

3 Section 13 of the John F. Kennedy Center Act (20

4 U.S.C. 76r) is amended by striking subsections (a) and

5 (b) and inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(a) MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND SECURITY.—

7 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Board to

8 carry out section 4(a)(1)(H)—

9 ‘‘(1) $17,000,000 for fiscal year 2004; and

10 ‘‘(2) $18,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005

11 through 2008.

12 ‘‘(b) CAPITAL PROJECTS.—There are authorized to

13 be appropriated to the Board to carry out subparagraphs

14 (F) and (G) of section (4)(a)(1)—

15 ‘‘(1) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2004;

16 ‘‘(2) $18,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005

17 and 2006; and

18 ‘‘(3) $12,000,000 for fiscal years 2007 and

19 2008.’’.

Passed the Senate October 31, 2003.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1757

AN ACT

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations for the John F. Kennedy

Center for the Performing Arts.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. CHARLES A. BELLON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 398 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Tracking Number 2010-03-07 (CSC-03) 


Concept of Operations and Acquisition Approach 


NASA Advisory Council Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that NASA structure the crew transportation service acquisition 

approach and associated ISS concept ofoperations to take maximum advantage of the variety of 

potential commercial transportation capabilities. The Council recommends that future 

commercial crew transportation service solicitations simply specify the minimum and maximum 

number of seats to and from the ISS NASA would purchase in a given solicitation. This 

approach will allow bidders flexibility to structure the offer that best fits the offeror's business 

model. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs and plans to maximize the number of commercial partners to the greatest extent 

practical within budget constraints. It is our goal to enable a diverse portfolio of commercial 

transportation service capabilities with the intent of allowing for the commercial industry to 

expand their business cases to include NASA's needs, as well as those ofthe pUblic. We 

recognize the importance ofsupporting the business models ofvarious potential partners and, as 

such, we are establishing processes and requirements that allow for flexibility throughout the life 

cycle ofthe program. 

NASA's acquisition strategy is still in development. We hope to have a better definition ofthe 

instruments (or combination of instruments), perfonnance objectives, and safety requirements 

and standards in the spring of2011 to support a solicitation for commercial crew transportation 

development agreements. 

However, is it unlikely that NASA will only specify the minimum and maximum number of 

seats. NASA has already identified additional perfonnance objectives for commercial crew 

systems. For example, the 2010 NASA Authorization Act requires NASA to include crew 

rescue requirements in any solicitation for commercial crew capabilities. 

Enclosure 2
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

May 11, 2022
Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Federal
Computer Week/Government Executive Awards Dinner on May 12, 2022

On May 12, 2022, Federal Computer Week (FCW) and Government Executive (GovExec)
will jointly host an awards dinner at The National Cathedral in Washington, DC, starting at
6:00 p.m. The event will provide a forum for informal discussion with other personnel in the
information technology field.

Approximately 700 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies,
academia, and media. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is
$175 per person. Both FCW and GovExec are in control of the organizing, planning and
invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements
of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). I further determine
that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend. the event because it will
provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to
NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees — including NASA employees
in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order
13989 — who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the sponsor
may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the
individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their
duties.

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the FCW/GovExec, such as procurement duties, program management, or
negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination
from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are
reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation.

Adam tor
2 min read

# NASA to Participate in Next Private Astronaut Mission News Conference

### Roxana Bardan

Dec 08, 2023

RELEASEM23-145

NASA Headquarters

Johnson Space Center

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA experts will join a virtual news conference hosted by Axiom Space at 10 a.m. EST Wednesday, Dec. 13, to discuss the launch of Axiom Mission 3 (Ax-3), the third private astronaut mission to the International Space Station.

The Ax-3 launch aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft is targeted no earlier than January 2024 from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

During the mission, which includes about 14 days aboard the space station, the four-person multi-national crew will complete more than 30 research experiments developed for microgravity in collaboration with organizations across the globe.

Briefing participants are:
            - Joel Montalbano, manager, International Space Station Program, NASA
            - Angela Hart, manager, Commercial Low Earth Orbit Development Program, NASA
            - Matt Ondler, president, Axiom Space
            - Michael López-Alegría, chief astronaut and Ax-3 commander, Axiom Space
            - Sarah Walker, director, Dragon Mission Management, SpaceX
            - Col. Valerio Anastasi, chief of space programs and capabilities office, Italian Air Force
            - Yusuf Kıraç, president, TUA (Turkish Space Agency)
            - Frank De Winne, head of the European astronaut center, ESA (European Space Agency)

Media must register for the mission overview news conference by 1 p.m., Tuesday, Dec. 12, at:

https://bit.ly/46J3Q5T

In addition to former NASA astronaut López-Alegría commanding the private mission, Walter Villadei of Italy will serve as pilot. The two mission specialists are Alper Gezeravci of Turkey and ESA (European Space Agency) project astronaut Marcus Wandt of Sweden.

NASA’s goal is to enable a strong, commercial marketplace in low Earth orbit where the agency is one of many customers for private industry. The agency recently released its third request for information with proposed requirements for commercial space station services and awarded agreements to advance additional capabilities.

Learn how NASA is fostering a robust commercial low Earth orbit economy at:

https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/commercial-space/

-end-

Joshua FinchHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100joshua.a.finch@nasa.gov

Rebecca TurkingtonJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111rebecca.turkington@nasa.gov

Alexis DeJarnetteAlexis@axiomspace.com

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

NASA Headquarters

## Related Terms

                - Expedition 70
                - International Space Station (ISS)