alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Announcement of membership of the National Science Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

This announcement of the membership of the National Science Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is made in compliance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be addressed to Interim Director, Division of Human Resource Management and Chief Human Capital Officer, National Science Foundation, Room 315, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Judith S. Sunley at the above address or (703) 292-8180.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The membership of the National Science Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is as follows:

Cora B. Marrett, Acting Deputy Director, Chairperson;

Richard A. Behnke, Head, Upper Atmosphere Research Section;

Deborah F. Lockhart, Deputy Director, Division of Mathematical Sciences;

Martha A. Rubenstein, Director, Office of Budget, Finance and Award Management, and Chief Financial Officer;

Brian W. Stone, Deputy Director, Division of Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics Division;

Judith S. Sunley, Interim Director, Division of Human Resource Management and Chief Human Capital Officer;

Mark L. Weiss, Director, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences.

Dated: October 18, 2010.

Judith S. Sunley,

Interim Director, Division of Human Resource Management and Chief Human Capital Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-26763 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### A. Watson’s Exr. *v.*George McDonald.

Contract — Petition — Answer.

Tbe appellant alleges in his petition that tbe wbisky was to be delivered as tbe plaintiff might need or call for it, but all to be delivered in six months, and the answer, without denying this, avers that the whisky was to be delivered at such times and in such quantities as called for within six months. *Held,*this slight variation cannot be taken as traversing the distinctive allegations of the petition. The answer neither alleges the delivery of the whisky nor any legal excuse for the failure, and was not a bar to the action.

APPEAL FROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT.

*Records,*for Appellant.

*Landrum,*for Appellee.

February *5,*1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The pleadings concur in the statements of the contract between the parties, except that the petition alleges that the whisky was “ to be delivered as plaintiff might need or call for it, *but all to be delivered within six months from the time the contract was made,”*and the answer, without denying this, avers that the whisky was “ to be delivered in such quantities, and such times as called for by the plaintiff within the six months spoken of by the plaintiff.” As just intimated this slight variance cannot be taken as traversing the distinctive allegation that *all*of the whisky was to be delivered at the designated place within six months from the time the contract was made, and as the answer neither alleges a delivery of the whisky within the prescribed time, nor any legal excuse for the failure to deliver, it did not as we think present a bar to the action by the admission of the pleadings; therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to recover.

On the return of the cause, however, the defendant should be allowed to amend his answer should he offer to do so.

Wherefore, for the reason indicated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial and further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
# Earth Observations taken by STS-115 crewmember

S115-E-07114 (17 Sept. 2006) --- This nadir photo of Cape Cod,  Massachusetts, taken on Sept. 17, 2006 at 18:13:44 GMT, was part of a series in this area captured by the crew of the space shuttle Atlantis's STS-115 mission.  Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s115e07114/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 18, 2006ProducerJSCSize1920x1307pxPIA Numbers115e07114The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 12, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report 

253463 

Date: Number of 

Employees requiring PIV credentials* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* 

Number of Employees with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* 

Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* 

Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials 

Number of Contractors requiring NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check 

Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process 

Number of Contractors with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation) 

Mar/2007 18,750 0 N/A N/A 0 70,996 52,885 N/A N/A 

Jun/2007 18,693 2,808 N/A N/A 17 56,487 35,159 N/A N/A Sept/2007 18,787 0 N/A N/A 14 54,005 15,363 N/A N/A Dec/2007 17,751 208 2,578 16,051 86 58,909 3,747 30,459 24,753 Mar/2008 17,414 203 2,221 16,377 1,394 58,422 4,036 29,395 26,391 Jun/2008 7,286 636 4,136 14,033 11,519 34,710 3,605 25,684 26,099 Sep/2008 1,696 253 3,806 14,376 16,739 24,147 3,094 21,053 36,499 Dec/2008 480 232 3,749 14,538 17,990 6,947 1,599 18,708 39,969 Mar/2009 464 187 3,870 14,647 18,240 6,008 860 17,853 41,083 Jun/2009 599 228 3,675 14,992 18,296 8,706 2,466 22,515 40,099 Sept/2009 661 231 2,862 15,880 18,312 7,811 2,350 20,011 43,603 Dec/2009 591 263 2,302 16,387 18,361 8,217 1,993 17,149 46,269 Maar/2010 582 236 2,334 16,354 18,342 5,871 219 14,869 48,422 

Key Milestone Dates

[Planned Date of Full Implementation] 9/30/2011 

Complete issuance of PIV credentials to all Employees and Contractors: October 27, 2008 Complete adjudication or verification of background investigations for all Employees and ContComplete integration of PIV credentials with logical access systems: September 30, 2011 Complete integration of PIV credentials with physical access systems: December 1, 2009 Issuing PIV credentials to all new employees and contractors as part of the boarding process:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            8483
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6588
<ALLOWANCES>                                        85
<INVENTORY>                                      10221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26638
<PP&E>                                            4408
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13902
<OTHER-SE>                                       14436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29684
<SALES>                                          17771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17771
<CGS>                                            12948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                338
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (158)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       180
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 26, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD J. EVEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1290

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01557-CMA-CBS) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1290 Document: 01018463532 Date Filed: 07/26/2010 Page: 1
S. 1791

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 to provide that the amounts

received by the United States under that Act shall be deposited in the reclamation

fund, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASE LOT CONVEYANCE.

Section 4(b) of the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 (116

Stat. 2879) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘As consideration’’ and inserting the following:

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—As consideration’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(2) USE.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall

be—

‘‘(A) deposited by the Secretary, on behalf of the Rio

Grande Project, in the reclamation fund established under

the first section of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C.

391); and

‘‘(B) made immediately available to the Irrigation Districts, to be credited in accordance with section 4(I) of

the Act of December 5, 1924 (43 U.S.C. 501).’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
     the quarterly period ended April 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: June 7, 2006                     /s/ Clyde B. Anderson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Clyde B. Anderson
                                        Executive Chairman of the Board
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1777

For the relief of Marcela Silva do Nascimento. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 23, 2003

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Marcela Silva do Nascimento.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCELA 

4 SILVA DO NASCIMENTO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Marcela Silva do Nascimento shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•S 1777 IS 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Marcela Silva do 

2 Nascimento enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), Marcela Silva do 

4 Nascimento shall be considered to have entered and re5 mained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible 

6 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi7 gration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact8 ment of this Act. 

9 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

10 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap11 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica12 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

13 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Marcela Silva do Nascimento, the Secretary of 

17 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur18 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num19 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

20 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

21 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

22 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail23 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

24 section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
# STS-50 launch

STS050-S-040 (25 June 1992) --- A low-angle perspective captures the Space Shuttle Columbia as it lifts off on its way toward a scheduled record 13-day mission in Earth-orbit. STS-50 Columbia, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 102, soars into a cloudy sky after liftoff from Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Launch Complex (LC) Pad 39A at 12:12:23:0534 pm (Eastern Daylight Time (EDT)). A low-angle perspective captures OV-102 after it has cleared the launch tower and looks up the long trail of exhaust smoke pouring out the skirt of the left solid rocket booster (SRB) to the top of the external tank (ET). The three space shuttle main engines are visible as is the diamond shock effect produced at the SSME nozzles. This is the beginning of OV-102's scheduled record 13-day mission in Earth orbit. OV-102 is NASA's first extended duration orbiter (EDO).

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/sts050-s-040-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize2671x4096pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 30, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Sandra L. Johnson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-118341, 333-128882 and 333-143620) and Form S-3 (File Nos.
333-127710, 333-129213, 333-153471 and 333-159716) of Idenix Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2010 relating to the financial statements and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston,
Massachusetts


March 9,
2010
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tribeworks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Davidorf, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


March 30, 2004

                                    /s/ ROBERT C. DAVIDORF
                                    ___________________________
                                    By: Robert Davidorf
                                        Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO TRIBEWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY TRIBEWORKS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Broadway *v.*The State.—In error.

A PERSON conveyed to trustees a piece of ground for the purpose of having a public school-house erected thereon; and the- house was accordingly built. *Held,*that the grant was not forfeited, merely because the trustees had permitted religious, political, and temperance meetings, to be held in the house at times when such meetings did not materially interfere with any school taught in the house.
#### Hayworth *v.*Worthington and Another.

Parol evidence is admissible to prove that a bill of sale of goods, absolute on its face, was intended by the parties .to bo only a mortgage.

Tuesday, *July*28.

ERROR to the *Wayne*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

Assumpsit; plea, general issue; verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs below.

On the trial of the cause, the plaintiffs gave in evidence to the jury an instrument of writing executed by one *James*Hayworth, acknowledging an absolute sale by him of a quantity of bacon to the plaintiffs. The defendant, who claimed the same bacon under a subsequent purchase from *James Hayworth,*offered to prove by parol the instrument, a bill of sale, under which, the plaintiffs claimed, though absolute upon its face, was designed by the parties to it to be only a mortgage to secure a debt which *Hayworth*owed to the plaintiffs, and which the defendant contended had been satisfied. The plaintiffs objected, and the Court rejected the evidence.

It has frequently been decided that deeds for the conveyance of real estate, unconditional in their terms, might be shown by parol testimony to be intended by the parties as mortgages. These decisions are based upon the assumption, that the admission of such evidence is necessary for the prevention of fraud. Cas. Temp. Talbot, *62.*—King v. *Newman,*2 Munf. *40.*—Strong v. *Stewart,*4 Johns. C. R. 167.—*Dunham*v. *Dey, 15*Johns. R. 555.—*Walton*v. *Cronly’s*Adm’r. 14 Wend. *63.—Van*Bu*ren*v. *Olmstead et al., 5*Paige, 9. And the same principle has been more than once recognized by this Court. *Aborn*v. *Burnett,*2 Blackf. 101.*—Conwell et al.*v. *Evill,*4 *id. 67.*—Blair v. *Bass, Ib.*539. We are unable to perceive any good reason for distinguishing between deeds for land, and bills of sale of personal property, in this particular; and in the only cases which we have been able to find, in which the question has been raised in respect to the latter kind of instruments, the distinction has not been made. In Virginia, it has been held that parol testimony may be received to prove that a bill of sale purporting to be absolute, was really intended to be only a mortgage. *362*Chapman’s Adm'x v. Turner,*1 Call, *244.*—Robertson v. *Campbell et al.,*Call, *421.*—Dabney *et al.*v. *Green,*4 Hen. & Munf. 101.

*M. M. Ray, J. B. Ray,*and *C. H. Test,*for the plaintiff.

*J. S. Newman,*for the defendants.

The Circuit Court erred in rejecting the parol evidence offered by the defendant (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed and the verdict set aside with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 Parol evidence is admissible to show, that an absolute deed was intended as a mortgage, and that the defeasance had been omitted or destroyed by fraud or mistake. 4 Kent’s Comm. 142. It is the same, if it be omitted by design, upon mutual confidence between the parties; for the violation of such an agreement would b? a fraud of the most flagrant kind, originating in an open breach of trust against conscience and justice. Per Story, J., in *Taylor et ux.*v. Luther, 2 Stunn. 228.