alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1757

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations 

for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2003

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL

To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize 

appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the 

Performing Arts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

4 THE JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER. 

5 Section 13 of the John F. Kennedy Center Act (20 

6 U.S.C. 76r) is amended by striking subsections (a) and 

7 (b) and inserting the following: 
2

•S 1757 IS 

1 ‘‘(a) MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND SECURITY.—

2 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Board to 

3 carry out section 4(a)(1)(H)—

4 ‘‘(1) $17,000,000 for fiscal year 2004; and 

5 ‘‘(2) $18,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 

6 through 2008. 

7 ‘‘(b) CAPITAL PROJECTS.—There are authorized to 

8 be appropriated to the Board to carry out subparagraphs 

9 (F) and (G) of section (4)(a)(1)—

10 ‘‘(1) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2004; and 

11 ‘‘(2) $18,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 

12 through 2008.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0046 IN THE MATTER OF: L.L.M. -W., Respondent and Appellant . **GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 10 , 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 9 2021

04/09/2021
Case Number: DA 21-0046
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD ALLEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

ARISTEDES ZAVARAS; J.

HASSENFRITZ; MS. GRAHAM;

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; CORRECTIONS

CORPORATION OF AMERICA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1296

(D.C. No.1:08-CV-02506-ZLW-BNB) 

ORDER

The appellant failed to obtain either a final judgment or a Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)

certification, as he was ordered to do by this court on July 19, 2010. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1296 Document: 01018484080 Date Filed: 08/25/2010 Page: 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

T.W.

, a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 2023

- 0772

August 21, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lawrence Lefler

, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jeri Delgado , Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards

, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, ROTHSTEIN

- YOUAKIM , and LABRIT , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 6, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOSE LOPEZ, a/k/a David Cerpa,

a/k/a Gordo, a/k/a Eduardo RuizAcunis,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-3366

(D.C. No. 2:07-CR-20122-KHV-2)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, MURPHY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant Jose Lopez’s plea agreement. The

defendant pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute

it. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendant waived his right to appeal his

Appellate Case: 09-3366 Document: 01018472741 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

conviction or his sentence, provided his sentence was within the advisory

sentencing guideline range determined by the district court to apply. The

defendant’s sentence was below the statutory maximum and within the advisory

guideline range determined by the court. Nevertheless, the defendant filed a

notice of appeal. 

The government filed a motion to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to

United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

In response, the defendant, through counsel, requests the court to permit him to

appeal his sentence, but he advances no arguments why the appeal waiver is

unenforceable, and he concedes that “the Plea Agreement does not allow this

appeal.” Response at 2. We have reviewed the motion, the record and the

defendant’s response, and we agree that the defendant’s proposed appeal falls

within the scope of the appeal waiver, that he knowingly and voluntarily waived

his appellate rights, and that enforcing the waiver would not result in a

miscarriage of justice. See id., 359 F.3d at 1325 (describing the factors this court

considers when determining whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights).

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce the appeal waiver and

DISMISS the appeal. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM

Appellate Case: 09-3366 Document: 01018472741 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Page: 2
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Idenix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, David A. Arkowitz, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2006


                                              /s/ David A. Arkowitz
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              David A. Arkowitz
                                              Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Idenix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT (32)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best knowledge of the undersigned:








(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial


condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  March 24, 2010

/s/ Tony W. WolfeTony W. WolfeChief Executive OfficerDated:  March 24, 2010

/s/ A. Joseph LampronA. Joseph LampronChief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 455

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1904

To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami 

Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 

States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Mr. GRAHAM of Florida (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Environment and Public Works 

MARCH 10, 2004

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 

North Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Wilkie 

D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 400 North 

5 Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des-
2

S 1904 RS 

1 ignated as the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States 

2 Courthouse’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

6 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 

8 States Courthouse’’. 

Calendar No. 455

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1904

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located 

at 400 North Miami Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse’’. 

MARCH 10, 2004

Reported without amendment
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00284-CR

EX PARTE RYAN BASS

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-1967-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ryan Bass appealed the trial court's denial of Bass’s application for writ of habeas 

corpus. By letter dated September 16, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified Bass that the 

appeal was subject to dismissal because no final, appealable judgment or order had been 

signed by the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b); 26.2. In the same letter, the Clerk 

warned Bass that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 14 days from the date of 

the letter, Bass filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Bass filed a 

response, dated October 4, 2022, asserting that his counsel was told that an order was 

signed and was in the process of being filed with the District Clerk. We have not yet 

received a signed order from counsel or the District Clerk.
Ex parte Bass Page 2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 2022

Do not publish 

[OT06]
#### Jason SAUNDERS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cal A. TERHUNE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-15564.

D.C. No. CV-00-06577-OWW(DLB).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*820Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2003.

Jason Saunders, pro se, Lancaster, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Denise Alayne Yates, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS find PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jason Saunders, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s determination that a prisoner failed to exhaust administrative remedies, *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Saunders’ action because he admitted that he failed to exhaust prison administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); *Wyatt,*315 F.3d at 1120 (stating that a “prisoner’s concession to nonexhaustion is a valid ground for dismissal”); *McKinney v. Carey,*311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (holding that a prisoner cannot meet exhaustion requirements by exhausting available remedies during the course of litigation).

We construe the district court’s order as dismissing the action without prejudice. *See Wyatt,*315 F.3d at 1120.

Saunders’ remaining contentions lack merit and his request for judicial notice is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance
Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
R. David Martin, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. David Martin

R. David Martin
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
May 8, 2003
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 0 784

_____________________________ G LEN S CHOOLEY , Appellant,

v.

W ELLS F ARGO B ANK , N.A. as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007

- FXD2
, L INDA F LOWERS and S HARON C ASON , Appelle e s.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County

. Russell S. Roberts , Judge

. January 26, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Glen Schooley, pro se
, Appellant.
Kimberly George of Deluca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007

- FXD2; Thomas L. Lutz of Goodwin Law Group, P.A

. , Shalimar, for Appellee Linda Flowers; Sharon Cason,
pro se , Appell ee

.
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1940
WILLIAM M. SHEPHERD (CAPTAIN, USN, RET.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born July 26, 1949, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, but considers 

Babylon, New York his hometown. Married to Beth Stringham of Houston, Texas. He 

enjoys sailing, swimming, and working in his garage. His mother, Mrs. Barbara Shepherd, 

resides in Bethesda, Maryland. His father, Mr. George R. Shepherd, is deceased.

EDUCATION: Graduated from Arcadia High School, Scottsdale, Arizona, in 1967; 

received a bachelor of science degree in aerospace engineering from the U.S. Naval 

Academy in 1971, and the degrees of ocean engineer and master of science in mechanical 

engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1978.

ORGANIZATIONS: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).

SPECIAL HONORS: Recipient of NASA’s "Steve Thorne" Aviation Award.

EXPERIENCE: Shepherd was graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1971, and has served with the Navy’s Underwater 

Demolition Team ELEVEN, SEAL Teams ONE and TWO, and Special Boat Unit TWENTY.

NASA EXPERIENCE: Selected by NASA in May 1984. A veteran of four space flights, Shepherd has logged over 159 days 

in space. Most recently, he was the Commander of the Expedition-1 crew on the International Space Station (October 31, 2000 

to March 21, 2001). Earlier he made three flights as a mission specialist on STS-27 (December 2-6, 1988), STS-41 (October 6-

10, 1990) and STS-52 (October 22 to November 1, 1992). From March 1993 to January 1996, Shepherd was assigned to the 

Space Station Program and served in various management positions.

Shepherd left NASA in January of 2002 to pursue private interests.

JANUARY 2002

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
FILED

March 22, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STANLEY ADAMS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) SHELBY COUNTY

v. ) C.C.A. No.

) W1999-02741-CCA-R3-PC

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the state’s motion, pursuant to Rule 20, Rules

of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to affirm the trial court’s judgment by order rather than

formal opinion. This case represents an appeal from the dismissal of the petitioner’s

third petition for post-conviction relief. In 1991, the petitioner was convicted of second

degree murder and aggravated robbery, and sentenced to 45 years as a Range III

offender. The petitioner subsequently filed two petitions for post-conviction relief

attacking this conviction. The trial court denied both petitions and this Court affirmed

the denials on appeal. See Stanley Adams v. State, Shelby County, No. 02C01-9208-

CR-00184 (Tenn. Crim. App., filed February 10, 1993, at Jackson); Stanley Adams v.

State, Shelby County, No. 02C01-9505-CR-00142 (Tenn. Crim. App., filed February 18,

1997, at Jackson).

On March 2, 1999, the petitioner filed the present petition for post-conviction

relief. The petitioner raises the issues of ineffective assistance of counsel and the

validity of his pleas, which are the same issues he raised in his previous petitions. 
Finding that the petitioner had previously filed two petitions for post-conviction relief and

that the present petition is time barred, the trial court dismissed the petition.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-202(c) provides that no more than one petition for

post-conviction relief may be filed attacking a single judgment, and mandates that the

trial court shall summarily dismiss any second or subsequent petition if a prior petition

was filed and resolved on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction. Since the

petitioner previously filed two petitions that were resolved on the merits by the trial court

and by this Court on appeal, the petitioner’s present petition was properly dismissed. 

Additionally, after reviewing the entire record on appeal, we find that the petitioner’s

claim does not fall within one of the limited circumstances under which a prior petition

may be re-opened. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-217.

Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the

petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the

Court of Criminal Appeals. It appearing that the petitioner is indigent, costs of this

appeal shall be taxed to the state. 

______________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:
______________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

______________________________

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0046

IN THE MATTER OF:

L.L.M.-W.,

Respondent and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until May 10, 2021, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 9 2021

04/09/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0046
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LOUIS DECOLA.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00181-CV

THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($3,445.00) UNITED 

STATES CURRENCY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08281

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Appellant is indigent; no costs are taxed in this appeal. 

SIGNED September 21, 2016.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ONE (1) FORD VAN, ECONOLINE.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 154 *N. J. Super.*326)
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (MANAGER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


     The undersigned  officer of Crusade Management Limited, a company organized
under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby certifies on behalf
of CML and on his own behalf for  purposes of the Crusade  Global Trust No. 2 of
2003 Class A Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I  am  duly   authorized  to  execute  and  deliver  this   Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and

     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied with all
           conditions and covenants  under the  Transaction  Documents,  for the
           Crusade  Global  Trust No. 2 of 2003  issue of Notes  for the  period
           between  September 15, 2003 and the end of the Manager's  fiscal year
           on September 30, 2003.

     Capitalized  terms used and not  defined  herein  shall  have the  meanings
assigned  to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced
issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 24, 2004.


                                                 /s/  G.M. Bartlett
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 By: G.M. Bartlett
                                                 Title: Director