alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,994
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             962
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                42,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,142
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             908
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               967
<LOANS>                                        193,856
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,107
<DEPOSITS>                                     289,532
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,912
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,988
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 322,107
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,897
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  787
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   203
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,887
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,364
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,523
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,036
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,036
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.27
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,036
<LOANS-PAST>                                       108
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,122
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       56
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,201
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,201
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 10, 2011
/s/ Daniel J. DormanName:
Daniel J. DormanTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                             BISON INSTRUMENTS, INC.
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


THE UNDERSIGNED, EDWARD G. LAMPMAN, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BISON INSTRUMENTS, INC. (THE "COMPANY"), HAS EXECUTED THIS
CERTIFICATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE FILING WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004 (THE "REPORT").

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:

1.       THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(a) OR
         15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

2.       THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
         MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF
         THE COMPANY.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SEC OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.


DATE:    FEBRUARY 16, 2005


                                      /S/ EDWARD G. LAMPMAN
                                      --------------------------------
                                      TITLE:  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                              AND DIRECTOR
#### KNOLLCROFT GARDENS v. BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Isaac C. WYNN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendant—Appellee, and Clark County Department of Human Resources; et al., Defendants.

No. 02-16583.

D.C. No. CV-01-01473-RLH/PAL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003. *

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

J.E. Ring Smith, Esq., Dan M. Winder, Esq., The Law Office of J.E. Ring Smith, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Evangelina Garcia Mendoza, Esq., Garcia-Mendoza *&*Snavely Chtd., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Isaac C. Wynn appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing as untimely his action alleging, among other things, employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *809We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim. *Ortez v. Washington County, State of Oregon,*88 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir.1996). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly concluded that Wynn’s Title VII claim was untimely because he did not file his complaint within ninety days of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) giving notice to him of his right to sue his former employer. *See*42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l); *Scholar v. Pac. Bell,*963 F.2d 264, 267 (9th Cir.1992). Contrary to Wynn’s contention, he could not evade dismissal by purposefully omitting the date of the right-to-sue letter from his complaint or by failing to attach a copy of the letter to the complaint. *See Parrino v. FHP, Inc.,*146 F.3d 699, 706 (9th Cir.1998) (holding that a plaintiff may not “surviv[e] a Rule 12(b)(6) motion by deliberately omitting references to documents upon which [its] claims are based[]”). Similarly, the district court’s consideration of the right-to-sue letter did not convert the defendants’ motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. *See id.*at 706 & n. 4.

The district court, however, failed to adequately address Wynn’s argument that his Title VII claim was saved by equitable tolling because EEOC employees misinformed him of the deadline for filing a federal action. *Cf. Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United States,*68 F.3d 1204, 1206 (9th Cir.1995) (“Because the applicability of the equitable tolling doctrine often depends on matters outside the pleadings, it ‘is not generally amenable to resolution on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.’ ” (citation omitted)). Accordingly, we vacate and remand.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 

Tongue Depressor Harmonica

Suggested Grades: 3-8

Activity Overview

In this activity, you will build a harmonica using tongue 

depressors (or popsicle sticks) and rubber bands. You 

will explore how vibrations create noise.

Steps

1. Cut two pieces off the straw so that they are each about 1 inch (2.5 centimeters) long as 

shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Gather supplies and cut two 1 inch long pieces off the straw

2. Stretch the thick rubber band lengthwise across one of the tongue depressors as shown 

in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Tongue depressor with a thick rubber band stretched lengthwise across it

Time: 15 minutes

Materials

• 2 Tongue depressors (craft sticks 

will also work)

• 1 Thick rubber band

• 2 Thin rubber bands

• Straw

• Scissors
3. About one inch from the end of the tongue depressor, place one piece of the straw 

between the rubber band and the tongue depressor as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Place one piece of the straw between the rubber band and the tongue depressor

4. About one inch from the other end of the tongue depressor, place the second piece of 

the straw on top of the rubber band. Place the second tongue depressor on top of the 

first as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Place the second piece of the straw near the other end and then put the second tongue depressor on top

5. To hold the tongue depressors together, wrap one of the thin rubber band around two 

tongue depressors between one of the straw pieces and the end of the tongue depressor 

as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Wrap one of the thin rubber band around the tongue depressors to hold them together

6. Repeat step 5 with the other thin rubber band near the other piece of the straw. The 

completed harmonica should look like Figure 6.

Figure 6. The completed harmonica

7. Put the harmonica up to your mouth and blow so that the air moves between the two tongue 

depressors. You should hear a buzzing noise!
8. Experiment with the harmonica to see how changes affect the noise it makes. Try moving the 

straw pieces closer together or further apart. Or, try blowing harder or softer.

9. The harmonica can also be made using craft sticks instead of tongue depressors as shown in 

Figure 7.

Figure 7. The harmonica can be made using craft sticks instead of tongue depressors

Background Information

Sounds are vibrations: All sounds are produced by vibrating objects. One of the reasons there 

are so many different sounds is that there is an endless variety of materials that can vibrate and 

produce them. If these vibrations are combined together, it can increase the loudness of the noise 

being created.

NASA engineers are working to make aircraft quieter to help reduce noise pollutions. 

Understanding how sound is created allows them to design planes which operate at lower noise 

levels. This is beneficial to both people and wildlife.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1831

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand income averaging 

to include the trade or business of fishing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

income averaging to include the trade or business of fishing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCOME AVERAGING FOR FARMERS AND FISH4 ERMEN NOT TO INCREASE ALTERNATIVE 

5 MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 55(c) (defining regular 

7 tax) is amended by redesignating paragraph (2) as para8 graph (3) and by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol9 lowing new paragraph: 
2

•S 1831 IS 

1 ‘‘(2) COORDINATION WITH INCOME AVERAGING

2 FOR FARMERS AND FISHERMEN.—Solely for pur3 poses of this section, section 1301 (relating to aver4 aging of farm and fishing income) shall not apply in 

5 computing the regular tax.’’. 

6 (b) ALLOWING INCOME AVERAGING FOR FISHER7 MEN.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1301(a) is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘farming business’’ and inserting ‘‘farm10 ing business or fishing business’’. 

11 (2) DEFINITION OF ELECTED FARM INCOME.—

12 (A) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 

13 1301(b)(1)(A) is amended by inserting ‘‘or fish14 ing business’’ before the semicolon. 

15 (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subpara16 graph (B) of section 1301(b)(1) is amended by 

17 inserting ‘‘or fishing business’’ after ‘‘farming 

18 business’’ both places it occurs. 

19 (3) DEFINITION OF FISHING BUSINESS.—Sec20 tion 1301(b) is amended by adding at the end the 

21 following new paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(4) FISHING BUSINESS.—The term ‘fishing 

23 business’ means the conduct of commercial fishing 

24 as defined in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens 
3

•S 1831 IS 

1 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 

2 U.S.C. 1802).’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2003.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 0196 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DUSTIN LEE LEGARE ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until June 22 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 22 2020

05/22/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0196
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | The information contained
 in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                            

|      |                 |  |                        
|----- | --------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: | August 6, 2010  |  | /s/ Sherman L. Black   
|      |                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|      |                 |  |                        
|Date: | August 6,
 2010 |  | /s/ Robert
 M. Wolf    
|      |                 |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
|  |
|--|
|  | **The 40th         Anniversary of the Mercury Seven**
 On October 7, 1958, the new National Aeronautics and Space Administration         (NASA) announced Project Mercury, its first major undertaking. The objectives         were threefold: to place a human spacecraft into orbital flight around         Earth, observe human performance in such conditions, and recover the human         and the spacecraft safely. At this early point in the U.S. space program,         many questions remained. Could a human function ably as a pilot-engineer-experimenter         in the harsh conditions of weightless flight? If yes, who were the right         people for the challenge?       

 The selection procedures for Project Mercury were directed by a NASA         selection committee, consisting of Charles Donlan, a senior management         engineer; Warren North, a test pilot engineer; Stanley White and William         Argerson, flight surgeons; Allen Gamble and Robert Voas psychologists;         and George Ruff and Edwin Levy, psychiatrists. The committee recognized         that the unusual conditions associated with spaceflight are similar to         those experienced by military test pilots. In January 1959, the committee         received and screened 508 service records of a group of talented test         pilots, from which 110 candidates were assembled. Less than one month         later, through a variety of interviews and a battery of written tests,         the NASA selection committee pared down this group to 32 candidates.       

 Each candidate endured even more stringent physical, psychological,         and mental examinations, including total body x-rays, pressure suit tests,         cognitive exercises, and a series of unnerving interviews. Of the 32 candidates,         18 were recommended for Project Mercury without medical reservations.         On April 1, 1959, Robert Gilruth, the head of the Space Task Group, and         Donlan, North, and White selected the first American astronauts. The "Mercury         Seven" were Scott Carpenter, L. Gordon Cooper, Jr., John H. Glenn, Jr.,         Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom, Walter M. Schirra, Jr., Alan B. Shepard, Jr.,         and Donald K. "Deke" Slayton.       

 At a press conference in Washington, D.C., on April 9, 1959, NASA introduced         the Mercury Seven to the public. The press and public soon adopted them         as heroes, embodying the new spirit of space exploration. Each one (except         Slayton, who was grounded because of a previously undiscovered heart condition,         but later flew as a crewmember of the Apollo Soyuz Test Project) successfully         flew in Project Mercury. During the five-year life of the project, six         human-tended flights and eight automated flights were completed, proving         that human spaceflight was possible. These missions paved the way for         the Gemini and Apollo programs as well as for all further human spaceflight.       

Top |

###   

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000892158
<NAME> LAUREL CAPITAL GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             686
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,761
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,523
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,034
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,078
<LOANS>                                        147,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,474
<DEPOSITS>                                     169,809
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,934
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,146
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 202,474
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,973
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,024
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   598
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,595
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,780
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,815
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 101
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,330
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        668
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,899
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       25
<RECOVERIES>                                        34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,923
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,923
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of ATEL
Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2007



|                                                         |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                         |  | 
|Dean L. Cash                                             |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of General Partner |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.