alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A04A1261.

#### HARDEN et al. v. YOUNG.

(606 SE2d 6)

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In this dispossessory action, James and Debra Harden, acting pro se, appeal the trial court’s grant of a writ of possession in favor of Janet Young. Because the Hardens failed to file a transcript of the bench trial, we affirm.

Young instituted dispossessory proceedings against the Hardens, claiming that the Hardens failed to pay rent pursuant to a lease agreement and seeking $4,800 in past due rent. The Hardens answered, claiming that they had not received proper notice to quit and justifying the nonpayment of full rent on the ground that the premises needed repair. Following a bench trial, the court issued a writ of possession in favor of Young and entered judgment against the *620Hardens for past due rent in the amount of $2,280, which included an offset to account for the repair problems.

Decided July 20, 2004

James Harden, *pro se.*Debra Harden, *pro se.*

*William S. Dominy,*for appellee.

Acting pro se, the Hardens appealed, claiming that they were entitled to a greater offset for the needed repairs, that they did not receive timely and proper notice to quit or to pay past due rent, and that Young had accepted a rent payment just prior to filing the dispossessory action. Each of these issues would require us to review the evidence submitted at trial.

> [The Hardens], however, failed to file a transcript of the proceedings and apparently did not attempt to reconstruct the transcript as allowed by OCGA§ 5-6-41 (g) and (i). When a transcript of the evidence is necessary, as it is here, and the appellant omits it from the record or fails to submit a statutorily authorized substitute, we must assume that the evidence supported the grant of a writ of possession. As the appellants], [the Hardens] had the burden to affirmatively show error by the record. This [they] failed to do. Therefore, we must presume the trial court’s judgment granting [Young] a writ of possession is correct.

*Seay v. Gables Residential Svcs.*
      *1*
      **See *Young v.*Pryer2 (affirming writ of possession and money judgment where transcript was absent from appellate record).

In her appellate brief, Young attempts to move for frivolous appeal sanctions. We do not consider this motion, however, as it was improperly filed. See Court of Appeals Rule 41 (b) (“All motions shall be filed as separate documents. ... No motions shall be filed in the body of briefs.”).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Barnes and Mikell, JJ., concur.*

*Seay v. Gables Residential Svcs.,*263 Ga. App. 495, 496 (588 SE2d 264) (2003).

*Young v. Pryer,*257 Ga. App. 768 (572 SE2d 99) (2002).
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 10, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE PORCELL, an individual, and all

others similarly situated,

Petitioner,

v.

LINCOLN WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.;

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Respondent. 

No. 10-505

(D.Ct. No. 1:08-CV-00617-MCA-LFG)

ORDER

Before MURPHY, TYMKOVICH and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’’s-petitioner’s Petition For

Permission To Appeal the order entered in the district court on March 31, 2010. We also

have a response from the defendant-respondent. The request for permission to appeal is

made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) and Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 5(a). Upon careful consideration of the pleadings, and the file and materials

submitted as a whole, the request for permission is denied. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 10-505 Document: 01018418143 Date Filed: 05/10/2010 Page: 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 29, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT SCHWARTZ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v. 

ARISTEDES W. ZAVARES, Executive

Director of the Colorado Department of

Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-1496

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01825-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1 and 3.3(B).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1496 Document: 01018358496 Date Filed: 01/29/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing  Tax  Credits  III,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Thomas J. Riha,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that such  provisions  require the filing of an opinion of registiered
          public  accountants to accompany the  Partnership's  annual  financial
          statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
December 29, 2005
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3229

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Marcus Deangelo Jones, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 30, 2008 Filed: January 8, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Marcus Jones appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct his presentence report (PSR) to omit references to “crack.” We find that Jones’s proposed ch ange does not amount to a clerical error or an error arising from oversight or omission. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. Jones did not object to the PSR prior to sentencing, see United States v. Paz , 411 F.3d 906, 909 (8th Cir. 2005) (facts in PSR are deemed ad mitted unless objected to), and there is-2- overwhelming evidence that the drugs at issue were crack cocaine, seeUnited States v. Jones , 275 F.3d 673, 676-78 (8th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm. We also de ny Jones’s motion for appellate counsel.

______________________________
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
               (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David J. Mickelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 13, 2003



                                               BY:   /s/  David J. Mickelson
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   David J. Mickelson
                                                   Executive Vice President,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   and Chief Operating Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


First Arizona Savings, FSB, Scottsdale, Arizona; Notice of 
Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for First Arizona Savings, FSB, 
Scottsdale, Arizona, (OTS No. 08489) on October 22, 2010.

    Dated: October 26, 2010.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-27490 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
GUY S. GARDNER 

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born January 6, 1948, in Alta Vista, Virginia, and grew up in 

Alexandria, Virginia. Married to the former Linda A. McCabe of Guilderland, New 

York. They have three wonderful children: Jennifer, Sarah, and Jason.

EDUCATION: Was graduated from George Washington High School in 

Alexandria, Virginia in 1965; received a bachelor of science degree with majors in 

astronautics, mathematics, and engineering sciences from the United States Air Force 

Academy in 1969 and a master of science degree in astronautics from Purdue 

University in 1970.

SPECIAL HONORS: Air Force Legion of Merit, 2 Defense Superior Service 

Medals, Defense Distinguished Service Medal, 3 Air Force Distinguished Flying 

Crosses, 14 Air Medals, National Intelligence Medal of Achievement, Distinguished 

Graduate of the USAF Academy, Top Graduate in Pilot Training, and Top Graduate 

from the USAF Test Pilot School, Test Pilot School Outstanding Academic 

Instructor, Test Pilot School Outstanding Flying Instructor, and Distinguished 

Astronaut Engineering Alumnus of Purdue University.

EXPERIENCE: Gardner completed U.S. Air Force pilot training at Craig Air Force Base, Alabama, and F-4 upgrade training at 

MacDill Air Force Base, Florida in 1971. In 1972, he flew 177 combat missions in Southeast Asia while stationed in Uborn, 

Thailand. In 1973-74, he was an F-4 instructor and operational pilot at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina. He 

attended the USAF Test Pilot School at Edwards Air Force Base California, in 1975, and then served as a test pilot with the 6512th 

Test Squadron located at Edwards in 1976. In 1977-78, he was an instructor test pilot at the USAF Test Pilot School. In 1979-

1980, he was operations officer of the 1st Test Squadron at Clark Air Base, Philippines. 

NASA EXPERIENCE: Gardner was selected as a pilot astronaut by NASA in May 1980. During his 11 years as an astronaut, he 

worked in many areas of Space Shuttle and Space Station development and support. In 1984, he was assigned as pilot on the first 

Space Shuttle mission to launch from Vandenberg AFB, California. That mission was later canceled. Gardner first flew in space as 

pilot on the crew of STS-27, aboard the Orbiter Atlantis, on December 2-6, 1988. The mission carried a Department of Defense 

payload. Gardner next flew as pilot on the crew of STS-35, aboard the Orbiter Columbia, on December 2-10, 1990. The mission 

carried the ASTRO-1 astronomy laboratory consisting of three ultraviolet telescopes and one x-ray telescope.

Gardner left NASA in June 1991 to command the USAF Test Pilot School at Edwards Air Force Base, California.

In August 1992, Gardner retired from the Air Force and returned to NASA to direct the joint U.S. and Russian Shuttle-Mir

Program.

DECEMBER 1994

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
#### Hickland *v.*The State.—In error.

INDICTMENT alleging that a certain negro had come into the state since the 1st of *September,*1831, without giving bond, &c., and that the defendant, knowing, &c., had hired him, &c. *Held,*that the act of 1831, entitled “An act concerning free negroes and mulattoes, servants *366and slaves,” on which the indictment was founded, is not unconstitutional. R. S. 1831, p. 375. — R. S. 1838, p. 418.— *The State*v. *Cooper, 5*Blackf. 258.—*Baptiste*v. *The State, Id.*283.
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PAUL STEPHEN HARLOW, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 68300 

# ALED
JUN 1 7 2016

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant Paul Stephen Harlow's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

Harlow pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted sexual assault. In his petition, Harlow sought to withdraw his plea on the basis that counsel incorrectly advised him that he was eligible for probation, which caused him to enter an unknowing plea. See 

### Hill u. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985) (observing that, to prove ineffective assistance of counsel sufficient to invalidate a judgment of conviction based on a guilty plea, a petitioner must demonstrate that his counsel's performance was deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and resulting prejudice such that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, petitioner would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial); Kirksey u. State, 112 Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). The district court denied the petition because Harlow was eligible for probation and therefore he failed to demonstrate that counsel was ineffective. We agree. See NRS 176A.100(1)(a) (listing crimes

(0) 1947Afor which probation is not permissible); NRS 176A.110(1) (explaining that

the court shall not grant probation to a person convicted of attempted sexual assault unless he does not represent a high risk to reoffend as certified in a psychosexual evaluation report). To the extent Harlow contended he was not adequately informed regarding the import of NRS 176A.110, or that he was promised he would receive probation, his contentions are belied by the record and did not warrant relief.' Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Paul Stephen Harlow Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to appoint counsel. 

### See NRS 34.750(1).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A aea
EXHIBIT 32.2










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Promotora Valle Hermoso, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Iuriy Vladimirovich Shevchenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Iuriy Vladimirovich ShevchenkoIuriy Vladimirovich Shevchenko, Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7 , 2009
1 min read

# A Home for Astronauts around the Moon

### Dylan Connell

Apr 02, 2024

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

The Gateway space station’s HALO (Habitation and Logistics Outpost) module, one of two of Gateway’s habitation elements where astronauts will live, conduct science, and prepare for lunar surface missions, is one step closer to launch following welding completion in Turin, Italy.

HALO, shown in this image from Oct. 23, 2023, will next undergo a series of stress tests to ensure its safety. Upon successful completion, the future home for astronauts will travel to Gilbert, Arizona where Northrop Grumman will complete final outfitting ahead of launch to lunar orbit.

Gateway will be humanity’s first space station in lunar orbit as an essential element of the Artemis missions to return humans to the Moon for scientific discovery and chart a path for the first human missions to Mars.

*Image Credit: Northrop Grumman/Thales Alenia Space*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF 7/29/00, AUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF 1/29/00 AND
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIODS
ENDED 7/29/00 AND 7/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 7/29/00.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                             680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,605
<PP&E>                                          28,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,723
<OTHER-SE>                                    (99,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,852
<SALES>                                         10,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,037
<CGS>                                            6,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (5)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1692

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Hugh Gregg 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Mr. SUNUNU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, 

as the ‘‘Hugh Gregg Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HUGH GREGG POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New 

6 Hampshire, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hugh 

7 Gregg Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•S 1692 IS 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Hugh Gregg Post Of3 fice Building.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of extension of public comment period.

# DATES:

Comments must be received no later than December 3, 2010.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Sequoia National Forest hereby gives notice that it is extending the public comment period for the Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) and Draft Management Plan, which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 6, 2010, (Volume 75, No. 151) originally for a 90-day comment period. Please see the Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS (75 FR 47592) for more detailed information related to the Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft EIS and Draft Management Plan. In response to requests for additional time, the Forest Service will extend the comment period from November 3, 2010, to December 3, 2010.                    

                        Federal, State, tribal, and local governments and other interested parties are requested to comment on the Draft EIS. Comments will be accepted by e-mail to                         *comments-pacificsouthwest-sequoia@fs.fed.us,*                         or                         *http://gsnm-consult.limehouse.com/​portal/​*                         or by mail to Anne Thomas, Giant Sequoia National Monument, Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257, or by facsimile to 559-781-4744.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anne Thomas at the address listed above or by telephone 559-784-1500.

Dated: October 27, 2010.

Barbara Johnston,

Acting Forest Supervisor, Sequoia National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-27599 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P