alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1924 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1924

     To provide for the coverage of milk production under the H-2A 
                      nonimmigrant worker program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2003

 Mr. Jeffords introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for the coverage of milk production under the H-2A 
                      nonimmigrant worker program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dairy Farm Workers Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF MILK PRODUCTION UNDER H-2A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the administration of the H-2A 
worker program in a year, work performed in the production of milk for 
commercial use not earlier than April 15 or later than October 15 of 
that year shall qualify as agriculture labor or services of a seasonal 
nature.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) H-2A nonimmigrant worker program.--The term ``H-2A 
        nonimmigrant worker program'' means the program for the 
        admission to the United States of H-2A nonimmigrant workers.
            (2) H-2A nonimmigrant workers.--The term ``H-2A worker'' 
        means a nonimmigrant alien described in section 
        101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
        U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)).
                                 <all>
```
#### Gilberto OROS-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70744.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 2003.*

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

Before NOONAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The Board of Immigration Appeals may summarily dismiss an appeal if “[t]he party ... indicates on Form EOIR-26 ... that he or she will file a brief or statement in support of the appeal and, thereafter, does not file such brief or statement, or reasonably explain his or her failure to do so....” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(E).

Oros-Martinez indicated on the EOIR26 form that he would file a separate written brief fully articulating the specific factual and legal basis for his appeal, but did not do so. Martinez now relies on *Vargas-Garcia v. INS,*287 F.3d 882 (9th Cir.2002), to support his claim that the form is ambiguous, and thereby excuses his failure to file a brief.

However, Vargas, unlike Martinez, did not indicate that he would file a separate written brief. *Id.*at 885 n. 3. Thus, his case turned solely on the clarity of the form’s instructions. *Id.*at 884. In contrast, Martinez committed to filing a brief, and was provided a briefing schedule by the BIA. Thus, any failure of the EOIR-26 form to adequately describe what the BIA requires in order to evaluate an appeal was not at issue. *See Toquero v. INS,*956 F.2d 193, 196 (9th Cir.1992).

Despite Martinez’ failure to file a brief, the BIA nevertheless examined his notice of appeal to ascertain whether the form *736adequately specified the factual and legal basis for the appeal.

Martinez’ notice of appeal contained a single conclusory statement: “The Immigration Judge erred in denying Respondent’s Application for Cancellation of Removal for Certain Non-Permanent Residents.” His failure to adequately specify the factual and legal basis for his appeal in either the EOIR-26 form or promised brief forecloses his due process claim. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*No. 02-35788, 2003 WL 21739501, *4-5 (9th Cir. July 29, 2003) (declining to address the petitioner’s due process claim where the notice of appeal did not adequately state the grounds for appeal and the failure to file a brief was due to “error and oversight”).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### MARVIN D. PERSKIE v. ROBERT V. BARNDT.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Tracking Number: 2010-01-01 (SC-01) 


Restart of Domestic Plutonium-238 (Pu-238) Production 


NASA Advisory Council Recommendation: 

The Science Committee urges NASA to work with the Department ofEnergy (DoE) 

to seek an equitable solution for the restart of domestic production ofPu~238, and 

for the development and testing of advanced Radioisotope Power Systems (RPSs). 

The Science Committee requests to be kept informed ofdevelopments on this issue 

at the next meeting. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

The use ofRPS power sources is vital to robotic exploration of the outer solar system and 

to many other situations where solar power is insufficient or not available. Without 

Pu-238 to fuel RPSs, exploration ofthe outer solar system will have to be abandoned and 

other exploration objectives curtailed. Pu-238 production in the US has been stopped and 

the amount available from Russia will not meet the need for robotic planetary exploration 

into the next decade. Russia has also stopped shipment ofPu-238 pending contract 

renegotiation. The 2011 budget contains funds for restarting Pu-238 production by DoE. 

The budget is sufficient for production ofonly a certain amount per year, the issue being 

resolution ofthe amount required by NASA between requirements in SMD and in 

ESMD. Additional funding will be necessary ifthe amount ofPu-238 required by NASA 

exceeds the value presumed by the 2011 budget. 

NASA Response 

NASA agrees with this recommendation and plans the following actions: 

1. 	 As SMD reported at the April meeting ofthe NAC Science Committee, NASA 

continues to work with DoE and the Office ofManagement and Budget on the 

finalization of a restart plan for Pu-238 as required by the Energy and Water 

Appropriations Subcommittee conference report. The restart plan has been 

cleared by NASA and is now in formal interagency concurrence. To date, NASA 

has made good progress, and we will continue to report to the NAC as events 

warrant. 

2. 	 SMD and ESMD have agreed in principle on an equitable distribution offunding 

in FY 2011 to support NASA's contribution in the President's budget request of 

$15M. 

Enclosure 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 30, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MARGO WAISANEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-1064

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01104-MSK-KMT) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1064 Document: 01018393971 Date Filed: 03/30/2010 Page: 1
STEM ACTIVITY:

Your Flight Log

www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

FLIGHT LOG

ENDORSEMENT 

CODE

YFALM10
2 | NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG

YOUR FLIGHT LOG

Hi! My name is Orville D. Squirrel. Ever since I was 

young, I have enjoyed traveling, especially when I 

could fly to new places. 

I am hoping that you can help me explore more of 

the world. When you travel somewhere, I would love 

if you would take me with you! While I love to fly, you 

can bring me along on any trip even if you travel in 

some other way. If you can’t travel, you can help me by 

sending me, either through the mail or through email, 

to people you know in other places. 

Did you know that pilots keep a flight log to record 

every time they fly? You can print out your own flight 

log and keep track of everywhere we go!

I hope you have fun helping me see the world. I can’t 

wait to see all the places we go!
NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG | 3 

Directions

1. First, print out a copy of Orville. You can print the color version or the black and white version. If you print the picture 

of Orville as well as the page that follows as a 2-sided document, there will be a log on the back of Orville to record 

his travel. Or just keep the log as a separate page.

2. Add your name to the sticker Orville is wearing which says, “I’m traveling with” and is located near his left arm. If you 

are using the black and white version of Orville, personalize him however you like.

3. While Orville travels, take photos of him in fun places if you can. If you send Orville to a friend or family member, ask 

them to take pictures, too.

4. After Orville takes a trip, either real or virtual, log it in your flight log. To get the distance for a trip, you can enter your 

home and the destination in an online mapping program.

5. Use a map to mark all the places Orville travels to. This can be done using an online mapping site or an actual map.

NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG | 5 
6 | NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG

Date From To

How did Orville 

Travel? 

(flew, drove, etc.)

Orville traveled... Did Orville 

travel 

Alone With You back?
NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG | 7 
8 | NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG

Date From To

How did Orville 

Travel? 

(flew, drove, etc.)

Orville traveled... Did Orville 

travel 

Alone With You back?
NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG | 9 

YOUR FLIGHT LOG

Date From To

Distance 

Traveled 

(Miles)

How did Orville Travel? Orville traveled... Did 

Orville 

travel 

Flew Drove Email Other Alone back? With a 

student

Total Distance Traveled:
10 | NASA AERONAUTICS—YOUR FLIGHT LOG

YOUR FLIGHT LOG

Date From To

Distance 

Traveled 

(Miles)

How did Orville Travel? Orville traveled... Did 

Orville 

travel 

Flew Drove Email Other Alone back? With a 

student

Total Distance Traveled:
EP-2021-12-544-HQ

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters

300 E Street SW

Washington, DC 20546
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROY MATTHEWS.

November 10, 1986.

Leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily-reversed and remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in light of *State in the Interest of R. W.,*104 *N.J.*14 (1986). Jurisdiction is not retained.
Auger Conveyor Dryer Technology 

A NEW PARTNERING OPPORTUNITY

Reference No: 80JSC021ACDT

Potential Commercial Applications:

Bulk handling industry, agriculture, food processing, mining industry, commercial space

in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), and others

Keywords: Screw Conveyor Dryer, Auger Dryer, Screw Feeder, Worm Conveyor, 

Archimedean Screw, Spiral Conveyor, Hopper

Purpose:

NASA JSC seeks to advance the technology associated with auger conveyor dryers, also 

known as screw conveyor dryers, to move and dry lunar surface material (soil, a.k.a. 

regolith) with the goal of producing water from the lunar soil.

While augers are effective devices for terrestrial use, technology advances are needed to 

produce a capable auger dryer that will work on the moon. Continuous icy regolith 

processing in a lunar environment is complex with many variables including, but not 

limited to: low gravity, thermal effects from extreme temperatures, pressure effects from 

hard lunar vacuum, and solid and vapor flow rates suitable for water production while

balancing the regolith transient time (physical flow rate) versus residence time (thermal 

flow rate). 

In pursuing technology improvements to achieve a lunar capability, new and improved 

features for auger dryers will provide additional options for terrestrial applications. 

Technology:

Technology goals, include, but are not limited to: reduce system size (i.e. volume and 

mass), improve heating efficiency and thermal control, increase energy efficiency, 

accommodate a wider range of material types and sizes, higher durability/reliability, 

torque and temperature sensing, re-configurability, variable pitch augers, and hopper feed 

technology.

Research is planned to determine the viability of manipulating the shaft and auger threads 

to create a steady-state material plug at the inlet and outlet of the auger system, thereby 

removing the need for mechanical isolation valves. 

R&D Status:

NASA JSC is equipped with an auger dryer testbed that will be used to validate 

mechanical and thermal models using a lunar regolith simulant. Technology goals noted 

above will be evaluated using the current testbed. Data from these tests will feed into a 

second generation testbed to verify improved capabilities.

Intellectual Property (IP):

This Partner relationship may produce new IP that could be jointly owned by NASA and 

the partner or may become the property of the partner.
#### Clark *v.*Spears.

In a suit on the assignment of a promissory note, the declaration stated that the term of the Court at which the plaintiff had obtained judgment against the maker, was adjourned on the 7th of *September,*1839, and that a *fi. fa.*issued on the judgment on the 21st of the same month. *Held,*that the declaration showed, *prima facie,*sufficient diligence in taking out execution.

APPEAL from the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by *Clark,*assignee, against *Spears,*assignor, of a promissory note. The declaration contains two counts.1 Tire first count alleges that the note was made by *Taylor*and *Smith*to *Marshall,*indorsed by the payee to *Sumner,*by the latter to the defendant, and by the defendant to the plaintiff; that the plaintiff indorsed the note to *Mains ;*that the latter obtained judgment against the makers of the note at the *August*term, 1839, of the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court, which was the first term after the assignment of the note to the plaintiff; that the said term was not adjourned until the 7th of *September,*1839; that, on the 21st of the same month of *September, Mains*sued out a *fieri facias*on the judgment, which was returned “No goods or chattels, lands or tenements;” that the. plaintiff received back the note from *Mains,*&c.; by *303means whereof, &c. The second count is substantially the same with the first. *<*

*R. A. Chandler*and *D. Mace,*for the appellant.

*Z. Baird,*for the appellee.

General demurrer to each of the counts, and judgment for the defendant.

The declaration is objected to on the ground, that the execution was not issued on the judgment against the makers of the note in time. The Court adjourned on the 7th of *September,*1839, and the execution issued on the 21st of the same month. This *shows, prima facie,*sufficient diligence in taking out execution. If the defendant can show that he sustained a loss by the delay in the issuing of the execution, he will have the right to do so. *Dorsey*v. *Madlock et al.*7 Blackf. *113.*— Nance v. *Dunlavy, Id.*172. The demurrer should have been overruled.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Md., Campus

Foreign Visitor Information Sheet

(Please TYPE OR PRINT)

First (or Given) Name:

Middle Name (or “none”):

Last (or Family) Name:

Phone Number of Foreign Visitor: Email Address:

Gender (check one): □ Male □ Female

Purpose of Visit:

U.S. Social Security Number (if applicable):

Are you a Permanent Resident Alien (Greencard Holder)? □ No □ Yes

If “yes,” please list number: Date of Issue (mm/dd/yyyy):

Expiration (mm/dd/yyyy):

Country of Citizenship:

Date of Birth (mm/dd/yyyy):

Country of Birth: City of Birth:

Permanent Home Address:

Spouse’s Name

(include maiden name, if applicable):

Place and Date of Entry into U.S.:

Address During U.S. Stay:

NASA Facility to be Visited: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

Name of NASA Point of Contact:

Planned Dates of Visit (inclusive):

Affiliation or Employer Information:

Institution or Company Name:

Street Address:

City:

State/Country:

ZIP or Postal Code:

Title or Position and Duties:

Name of U.S. Point of Contact:

Phone Number for U.S. Contact:

Fax Number for U.S. Contact:

Email for U.S. Contact:

U.S. Visa Information:

U.S. Visa Type (e.g.; B-1/B-2, H-1B, J-1, F-1, etc):

Visa Number:

Visa Expiration Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

If J-1, name of U.S. Prog. Sponsor (attach IAP-66):

Passport Information:

Country of Issue:

Passport Number: (See attached scan.)

Expiration Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

* NOTE: ALL fields MUST be 

completed. Otherwise, Goddard’s 

Security Office may deny the 

requestor/visitor’s visit.
https://www.nasa.gov/astronauts 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

 

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center 

Houston, Texas 77058 

 

April 2021 

Loral O’Hara

NASA Astronaut

Summary:

Loral O’Hara was selected by NASA to join the 2017 Astronaut Candidate Class. She reported for duty in August 

2017 and having completed the initial astronaut candidate training is now eligible for a mission assignment. The 

Texas native earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Kansas and a Master 

of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University. Prior to joining NASA, her work focused 

on the engineering and operations of deep-ocean scientific research submersibles and robots.

Personal Data:

O’Hara was born in Houston, Texas, and most recently resided in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Recreational 

interests include outdoor sports such as sailing, surfing, kayaking, backpacking, and pond hockey. She also enjoys 

reading, painting, and traveling. She holds a Private Pilot license.

Education:

Graduated from Clements High School in Sugar Land, Texas in 2001. Earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 

Aerospace Engineering from the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kansas, in 2005. Earned a Master of Science 

degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University, in West Lafayette, Indiana in 2009.

Experience:

At the time of her selection in June 2017, O’Hara was a Research Engineer at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 

(WHOI) in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, where she spent eight years working on the engineering and operations of 

underwater vehicles such as the human-occupied research submersible Alvin and the remotely operated vehicle 

Jason. Her experience includes mechanical design and analysis, systems engineering, manned submersible testing 

and certification, and vehicle operations. She participated in eleven scientific research cruises aboard research 

vessels as a mechanical technician and data processor. From 2006 to 2007, she worked for Rocketplane inOklahoma 

City, Oklahoma as a project engineer on the development of a suborbital space vehicle.

NASA Experience:

O’Hara worked as an intern at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in 2003, participated in the NASA Academy at 

Goddard Space Flight Center in 2004, and participated in the NASA KC-135 Reduced Gravity Student Flight 

Opportunities Program in 2005. In May 2017, she was selected as a member of the 22nd NASA astronaut class. She 

reported for duty in August 2017 and completed two years of training as an Astronaut Candidate. She is currently 

serving as the Astronaut Office’s Director of Operations in Russia.
 https://www.nasa.gov/astronauts 

Loral O’Hara

Awards/Honors:

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (2008).
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=174
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Huttig Building Products, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92495, 333-92497, and
333-92499) of our report dated January 22, 2001 appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Huttig Building Products, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 23, 2001
HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report 

Date: Number of 

Employees requiring PIV credentials* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* 

Number of Employees with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* 

Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* 

Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials 

Number of Contractors requiring NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check 

Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process 

Number of Contractors with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation) 

Mar/2007 18,750 0 N/A N/A 0 70,996 52,885 N/A N/A 

Jun/2007 18,693 2,808 N/A N/A 17 56,487 35,159 N/A N/A Sept/2007 18,787 0 N/A N/A 14 54,005 15,363 N/A N/A Dec/2007 17,751 208 2,578 16,051 86 58,909 3,747 30,459 24,753 Mar/2008 17,414 203 2,221 16,377 1,394 58,422 4,036 29,395 26,391 Jun/2008 7,286 636 4,136 14,033 11,519 34,710 3,605 25,684 26,099 Sep/2008 1,696 253 3,806 14,376 16,739 24,147 3,094 21,053 36,499 Dec/2008 480 232 3,749 14,538 17,990 6,947 1,599 18,708 39,969 Mar/2009 464 187 3,870 14,647 18,240 6,008 860 17,853 41,083 Jun/2009 599 228 3,675 14,992 18,296 8,706 2,466 22,515 40,099 

Key Milestone Dates

[Planned Date of Full Implementation] 9/30/2011 

Complete issuance of PIV credentials to all Employees and Contractors: October 27, 2008 Complete adjudication or verification of background investigations for all Employees and ContComplete integration of PIV credentials with logical access systems: September 30, 2011 Complete integration of PIV credentials with physical access systems: December 1, 2009 Issuing PIV credentials to all new employees and contractors as part of the boarding process:
#### HERMAN CAPLAN v. MEYER BROTHERS.

July 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### DAVID HOCHMAN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEWARK.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.