alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1151

LT Case No. 2021-DP-000129-A

_____________________________

C.L., FATHER OF C.L., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Michael Kalil, Judge. 

Amanda Peterson, Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for 

Appellant. 

Sarah J. Rumph, of Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and 

Krystle Celine Cacci, Senior Attorney, of Statewide Guardian 

ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Patrick M. Hagen, of 

Nelson Mullins, Tallahassee, for the Office of the Guardian ad 

Litem. 

August 29, 2023 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and JAY, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# Flight Research Hangar

Home to many unique and innovative aircraft, the Flight Research Building, known as the NASA Glenn Hangar, is located at the NASA Glenn Research Center, adjacent, with direct access to, Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. Built in the 1940s, the Hangar is a 65 x 250-foot, heated facility that is large enough to hold numerous aircraft of various sizes.Inside the Hangar, the Aircraft Operations Administrative Office handles daily operations including flights, maintenance and aircraft modifications for scientific research and aeronautical test purposes.  The facility houses offices, flight-planning areas, and a full-scale metal, battery and avionics shop. 

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    Hangar: Outside

    Hangar: Inside

    Hangar: Viking Outside

    Hangar: Viking Inside

    Hangar: Twin Otter

    Hangar: T34C Mentor Outside

    Hangar: T34C Mentor Inside

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer of American
Consolidated Management Group, Inc. (the Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George MappinGeorge MappinInterim Chief Executive OfficerDated: July 18, 2008/s/ George MappinGeorge MappinInterim Chief Financial OfficerDate: July 18, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                     Certification of Corporate Controller
                                   Pursuant to
                              U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Therese E. Violette, Corporate Controller of MCK Communications, Inc.,
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (i)   MCK Communications' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
            ended April 30, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of MCK Communications.

                                          Dated: June 26, 2003
                                          /s/ [Therese E. Violette]
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Therese E. Violette
                                          Corporate Controller
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Exhibit 99.1 Certification of President and CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin
R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ Edwin R. Maus
----------------------------------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q OF
MUZAK LIMITED PARTNERHIP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000891983
<NAME> MUZAK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                       905
<INVENTORY>                                      4,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,142
<PP&E>                                          86,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,405
<BONDS>                                        102,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,396
<SALES>                                         17,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,667
<CGS>                                            6,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,903)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,903)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,203
<SECURITIES>                                    16,197
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,069
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,256
<PP&E>                                          32,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,561)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,707
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,596)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,472
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,011
<CGS>                                            4,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (261)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WENDEL ROBERT WARDELL, JR.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-1193

(D.C. No. 1:03-CR-00415-REB-1)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, TYMKOVICH, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Wendel T. Wardell, Jr., proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the district

court’s March 5, 2010 Order and March 17, 2010 Order. Defendant’s motion pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255 is proceeding before the district court. We dismiss the appeal. The district

court orders appealed are interlocutory.

“Federal appellate jurisdiction generally depends on the existence of a decision by the

District Court that ‘ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but

execute the judgment.’ ” Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. McGlamery, 74 F.3d 218, 221

(10th Cir. 1996) (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. Liversay, 437 U.S. 463, 467 (1978)). In

Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006), the Supreme Court stressed that very few types of

Appellate Case: 10-1193 Document: 01018483986 Date Filed: 08/25/2010 Page: 1 
2

interlocutory orders can qualify as immediately appealable collateral orders. The “conditions

are ‘stringent,’ and unless they are kept so, the underlying doctrine will overpower the

substantial finality interests [28 U.S.C.] § 1291 is meant to further.” Id. at 349.

Upon review, the court finds that the March 5, 2010 and March 17, 2010 Orders

appealed by Defendant do not constitute final or immediately appealable decisions under §

1291 or under any recognized exception to the final judgment rule. These orders may be

appealed upon entry of final judgment in Defendant’s § 2255 proceeding.

Upon further review, the court construes Defendant’s notice of appeal as a petition

for writ of mandamus and denies such relief. Defendant has failed to make a sufficient

showing of a right to mandamus relief. See Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S.

33, 34 (1980); Pacificare of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Burrage, 59 F.3d 151, 153 (10th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The

petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1193 Document: 01018483986 Date Filed: 08/25/2010 Page: 2
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 47 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting budgetrelated points of order. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. RENACCI (for himself, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. AMODEI, and Mr. WESTERMAN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives 

respecting budget-related points of order. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘13.(a) It shall not be in order to consider a resolu5 tion reported by the Committee on Rules providing for the 

6 consideration of a bill or joint resolution that waives, or 

7 has the effect of waiving, any budget-related point of order 

8 unless the resolution specifies each such point of order. 

9 ‘‘(b)(1) Upon consideration of a resolution reported 

10 by the Committee on Rules providing for the consideration 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 47 IH 

1 of a bill or joint resolution, it shall be in order to offer 

2 a motion to strike or amend any provision of the resolution 

3 that waives, or has the effect of waiving, the application 

4 of a budget-related point of order in order to eliminate 

5 any such waiver from the resolution. 

6 ‘‘(2) A motion made pursuant to subparagraph (1)— 

7 ‘‘(A) shall be privileged; 

8 ‘‘(B) shall be debatable for 20 minutes, divided 

9 evenly between those in favor of the motion and 

10 those opposed to the motion; and 

11 ‘‘(C) may not be amended. 

12 ‘‘(3) At the conclusion of any debate on a motion 

13 made pursuant to subparagraph (1), the previous question 

14 shall be considered as ordered. It shall not be in order 

15 to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is 

16 agreed to or disagreed to. 

17 ‘‘(c) In this clause, the term ‘budget-related point of 

18 order’ means— 

19 ‘‘(1) in the Congressional Budget and Impound20 ment Control Act of 1974— 

21 ‘‘(A) section 302(f); 

22 ‘‘(B) section 303; 

23 ‘‘(C) section 306(b); 

24 ‘‘(D) section 311; or 

25 ‘‘(E) section 401; and 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 47 IH 

1 ‘‘(2) clause 10 of rule XXI.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
16:07:00 16:15:54 16:24:48 16:33:42 16:42:36 16:51:30 17:00:24 17:09:18 17:18:12 17:27:06 17:36:00 17:44:54 17:53:48 18:02:42 18:11:36 18:20:30 18:29:24 18:38:18 18:47:12 18:56:06 19:05:00 19:13:54 19:22:48 19:31:42 19:40:36 19:49:30 

Temp (C)
 

Pallet Temperature Chart 

0 70000

60000 -1050000

-20

T

40000

-30 A

30000

-40

20000

-50 10000-60 0

Time (GMT)
##### 



Exhibit 31.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jean-Pierre Sommadossi, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form10-K of Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;  b)
    [Not Applicable]  c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and  d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 2, 2005 /s/ Jean-Pierre SommadossiJean-Pierre SommadossiChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Meeting notice for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory 
Committee under Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000, as part of Public Law 110-343.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Meeting notice is hereby given 
for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 
205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 
2000 as part of Public Law 110-343. Topics to be discussed include: 
General information, proposals, updates on current or completed Title 
II projects, and next meeting agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 2, 2010, beginning at 5:45 
p.m. and ending at approximately 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Janet Huckabee Arkansas 
River Valley Nature Center, 8300 Wells Lake Road, Barling, Arkansas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. (501-321-5318).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and 
elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. Individuals wishing to 
speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to 
Bill Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

    Dated: February 3, 2010.
Bill Pell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2010-2762 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=2082
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                     COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                          ----------------------
                                                            1998           1997
                                                            ----           ----
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>   
Shares:

Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding                                               16,519        15,994
                                                          ========      ========

Net income                                                $  4,923      $  3,656
                                                          ========      ========

Basic earnings per share                                  $   0.29      $   0.23
                                                          ========      ========
</TABLE>