alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Artemis Camp Experience

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators

## Grade Levels

Grades K-4, Grades 5-8, Grades 9-12, Informal Education

## Subject

Engineering Design, Mathematics, Physical Science, Space Science, Technology, Solar System and Planets, Earth's Moon

## Type

Educator Guides, Lesson Plans / Activities

### Make your next camp about Artemis!

This set of hands-on activities tells the story of NASA’s Artemis Program that will land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon. Intended for use in K-12 informal education settings such as after school programs, summer camps, STEM nights, and weekend workshops, this education resource is sure to bring the excitement of returning to the Moon to the Artemis Generation of Explorers.

Artemis Camp Experience | Artemis Camp Experience [Spanish]

### **Explore Artemis Camp Experience Lesson Modules**

              - Design a Crew Module
              - Design Stabilizing Fins
              - Assess the Structural Integrity of a Space Module
              - Build a Heat Shield

### Download Infographic

Artemis I Launch Map 

### Watch Instructional Videos
##### 



Exhibit 3.4
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
   RESOLVED:

    That the first sentence of Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation be and hereby is deleted in its entirety and the
following new first sentence of Article Fourth be inserted in lieu thereof:FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which
the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 125,000,000
shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value per share (Common
Stock).
 st
 IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:

/s/ Jean-Pierre SommadossiJean-Pierre SommadossiChairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold a closed meeting on Thursday, November 4, 
2010 at 1:30 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session, and determined that 
no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
November 4, 2010 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive 
actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and 
other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 28, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27640 Filed 10-28-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Michael Neuman, the Chief Executive Officer of Magna Entertainment Corp. ("MEC"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the "Report") of MEC for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEC.

| |  |  | /s/MICHAEL NEUMANMichael Neuman, Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 14, 2007

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Magna Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Magna Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement 
under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear 
Energy Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 514,705.9 kg 
of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride (68.00% U), 350,000 kg of 
which is uranium, from Areva Resources Canada, Inc. (Areva Resources) 
in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to URENCO in Almelo, Netherlands. 
The material, which is currently located at Areva Resources, will be 
transferred to URENCO-Almelo for enrichment and use as fuel in civilian 
nuclear power programs in the United States and France. The material 
was originally obtained by Areva Resources from the Feed Component 
Substitution Implementing Contract.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: October 1, 2010.

    For the Department of Energy.
Thomas P. D'Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-27501 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Belmont Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Bromwell Financial
Fund, LP, certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2006
of Bromwell Financial Fund, LP fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Bromwell Financial Fund, LP.


BROMWELL FINANCIAL FUND, LP
By:  Belmont Capital Management, Inc., General Partner



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
    Michael Pacult
    Chief Executive Officer &
    Chief Financial Officer


Date:	 March 30, 2007
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1827

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that 

processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order 

applicable to pears. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the 

requirement that processors be members of an agency 

administering a marketing order applicable to pears.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PEAR MARKETING ORDERS. 

4 Section 8c(7)(C) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act 

5 (7 U.S.C. 608c(7)(C)), reenacted with amendments by the 

6 Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amend7 ed in the last sentence—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘or pears’’; and 
2

•S 1827 IS 

1 (2) by striking ‘‘: Provided,’’ and all that fol2 lows through ‘‘be equal’’.

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Johnny Ray Moore, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00178

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 12F113

- 005 ). Opinion delivered by Ch ief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Johnny Ray Moore, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 12, 2 013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Horace Traveler KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-6976.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Horace Traveler King, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan Ainsworth Ontjes, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Horace Traveler King seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that King has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *279materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000747

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

NOE RAQUINIO, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 3CPC-22-0000941)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that selfrepresented Defendant-Appellant Noe Raquinio appeals from the

Circuit Court of the Third Circuit's "decision and order"

purportedly entered on December 19, 2022. We conclude that the

court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal because no order was

entered on December 19, 2022, and the circuit court has not

entered a judgment in the underlying proceeding. Hawaii Revised

Statutes § 641-11 (2016); see State v. Nicol, 140 Hawai i 482,

486, 403 P.3d 259, 263 (2017).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, January 4, 2023.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000747

04-JAN-2023

08:06 AM

Dkt. 10 ODSLJ
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005
of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best knowledge and belief
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|Dated:  November 11, 2005 | /s/ John E. YetterJohn E. YetterVice President
     and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### IN THE MATTER OF APPROVAL OF SUSSEX COUNTY PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Aether Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-91369) on Form S-8 of Aether Systems, Inc. of our reports dated February 9,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Aether Systems, Inc. as of
December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and other comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the
related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1999, annual report
on Form 10-K of Aether Systems, Inc.


                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 24, 2000
NESC tech bulletin

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Applicability

Penetrant NDE of metallic aerospace pressure vessels and 

COPV liners.

Background

To minimize mass, designers of aerospace systems are 

reducing the wall thickness for metallic pressure vessels, such 

as the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) propellant tank and 

COPV liners that will be used in future Constellation Program 

vehicles. This reduction in wall thickness produces higher 

net section stresses, for a given internal pressure, resulting 

in smaller critical initial flaw size (CIFS). These smaller crack 

sizes are approaching the limitations of penetrant NDE. Failure 

to adequately demonstrate the capabilities of penetrant 

inspection methods over the required range of crack aspect 

ratios may lead to the failure to detect a critical flaw resulting 

in a catastrophic tank failure.

Data and Analysis

The current standards governing aerospace metallic pressure 

vessels (AIAA S-080) and COPV liners (AIAA S-081) require 

that fracture analysis be performed to determine the CIFS 

for cracks having an aspect ratio ranging from 0.1 to 0.5. 

They further require that NDE methods have a demonstrated 

capability of 90 percent probability of detection with a 95 

percent confidence (90/95 POD) for the CIFS determined by 

this analysis. Previously, NASA demonstrated this capability 

by testing at only a single aspect ratio and then used an 

equivalent area approach to extend the results to the required 

range of aspect ratios. However, there is insufficient data to 

support this approach and it may break down for smaller CIFS. 

Testing is needed to demonstrate the capability of penetrant 

inspection for smaller CIFS over the full aspect ratio range, or 

it may be necessary to demonstrate and implement alternative 

inspection techniques.

References

AIAA S-080 - Space Systems Metallic Pressure Vessels, Pressur-

ized Structures, and Pressure Components; AIAA S-081 - Space 

Systems Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPVs); NASASTD-5009 – Nondestructive Evaluation Requirements for FractureCritical Metallic Components; Orbiter Fracture Control Program

Capability Demonstrations for Penetrant Nondestructive

Evaluation (NDE) of Metallic Tanks and Composite Overwrapped 

Pressure Vessel (COPV) Liners

As the desired crack detection size is decreased and approaches the physical limitations of liquid penetrant 

inspection techniques, the approach of performing a probability of detection (POD) validation test at a single 

aspect ratio, and then extending the results to other aspect ratios based on equivalent area predictions may 

not be valid. POD testing for penetrant inspection of metallic pressure vessels and COPV liners should be 

performed at the bounds of the required range of crack aspect ratios.

Penetrant Indication for Tightly Closed (0.088 inch) Fatigue Crack

For information contact the NESC at www.nesc.nasa.gov

MSL Cruise Stage Propellant Tank

NESC-TB-09-04

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Technical Bulletin No. 09-04
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Space Act Agreement Internal Coordination 

2013-01-05 (CSC-Ol) 

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that NASA update its Space Act Agreement (SAA) process to be more 


transparent and efficient for those SAAs involving new policy issues between NASA and 


commercial partners which require broader coordination between Headquarters and a Center. 


The Council recommends: (1) designating a person responsible at Headquarters and the Center 


for resolving the issues; (2) establishing a time line for a Headquarters decision; and (3) 


identifying to the potential commercial partner a person with sufficient authority to move the 


process toward resolution. 


Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 


Most ordinary SAAs are dispatched in a reasonable amount oftime. However, SAAs presenting 


new policy issues require a broader coordination between a Center and Headquarters that can 


result in unusual delays without providing the commercial partner insight on when a decision 


will be made. The Council discovered that possible reasons for the delay included not 


identifying NASA personnel at Headquarters and the Center who are responsible for the 


decision, and not having an internal timeline to make a decision. Commercial partners seeking 


.an SAA often do not have a point of contact from whom they can get actionable information. 


Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 


SAAs involving new policy issues will continue to face unnecessary delay and commercial 


partners will be frustrated when dealing with NASA. 


NASA Response: 


NASA agrees that these issues need to be addressed. The NASA Office of General Counsel has 


recently briefed this NASA Advisory Council (NAC) recommendation to the senior team leads 


in the Office ofthe NASA Administrator responsible for working this issue. This team reports to 


NASA Deputy Administrator Garver and Associate Administrator Lightfoot to address NASA 


Headquarters guidance, governance, and the process for partnership activities. The team is 


implementing a strategic approach to partnering, following a briefmg Deputy Administrator 


Garver gave to the NASA Strategic Management Council (SMC) in January 2013. The NASA 


Executive Council (EC) is currently scheduled to review and approve some aspects ofthe team's 


recommendations early July 2013, with the remainder to be briefed to the SMC in late July 2013. 


Because this activity is still being worked and has not yet been approved by the EC nor the SMC, 


NASA is currently not in a position to communicate its final response concerning this NAC 


recommendation at this time. NASA would be pleased to brief the NAC on this recommendation 


after July 2013. 


Enclosure
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6026** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
SIDNEY KENNETH MITCHELL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. John Preston Bailey , Chief District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00068

- JPB

- 1 )

Submitted : April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Sidney Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sidney Ken neth Mitchell appeals the district court ’ s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006) motion for a
reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell , No. 3:06

- cr 00068

- JPB

- 1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 16, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

AFFIRMED
I 

★ 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1887 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient 

limitation on prescribing drug addiction treatments by 

medical practitioners in group practices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1887 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE 30-PATIENT LIMIT FOR 

2 GROUP PRACTICES. 

3 Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substance Act 

4 (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause 

5 (iv). 

Passed the Senate June 7, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.