alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66380-66381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Award of a Single-Source Grant to the Commonwealth Election 
Commission of Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 
(CNMI)

AGENCY: Administration on Developmental Disabilities, ACF, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA Number: 93.631.
    Statutory Authority: This award will be made pursuant to Section 
161 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 
of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15081-15083).
    Amount of Award: $100,000.
    Project Period: 9/30/2010-9/29/2011.
SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Administration for Children and 
Families (ACF), Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) has 
awarded a single-source grant to the Commonwealth Election Commission 
of Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
    In 2002, Congress enacted the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) [(Pub. 
L. 107-252] as a means of improving the administration of elections for 
Federal office. CNMI did not participate in Federal elections prior to 
the enactment of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (Pub. 
L. 110-229). CNMI has now elected a non-voting Delegate to the U.S. 
House of Representatives.
    With its participation in Federal elections, CNMI's eligibility for 
funding under HAVA is now established and, to that end, ADD is funding 
this award for a project designed to (1) Explore accessibility of 
polling places; (2) provide training and technical assistance to 
election officials, poll workers, and election volunteers on the best 
methods to promote the access and participation of individuals with 
developmental disabilities in elections for Federal office; and (3) 
train voters on how to use voting equipment to include

[[Page 66381]]

various voting machines to allow for equal opportunity for access and 
participation in the voting process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ophelia McLain, Supervisory Program 
Specialist, Administration on Developmental Disabilities, 370 L'Enfant 
Promenade, SW., Mail Stop: HHH-405D, Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 
202-690-7025. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f19e8199949d9890df9c929d90989fb1909297df999982df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5baa5bdb0b9bcb4fbb8b6b9b4bcbb95b4b6b3fbbdbda6fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Sharon Lewis,
Commissioner, Administration on Developmental Disabilities.
[FR Doc. 2010-27234 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Expedition 57 Image Gallery

The Expedition 57 image gallery shows photographs taken by the crew from aboard the International Space Station of its mission and science activities, including the Earth below.

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

The Soyuz rocket is rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome...

Workers are seen around the Soyuz rocket after it was raised into a vertical position on the launch pad, Tuesday,...

iss057e050440 (Oct. 13, 2018) --- Two Russian spacecraft, the Soyuz MS-09 crew ship (foreground) and the Progress 70 resupply ship,...

iss057e023363 (Oct. 10, 2018) --- The International Space Station was orbiting 256 miles above the Aegean Sea when this photograph...

iss057e029275 (Oct. 11, 2018) --- The three Expedition 57 crew members are gathered inside the cupola, the International Space Station's...

iss057e051220 (Oct. 13, 2018) --- The International Space Station was orbiting 256 miles above central Europe when this photograph was...

The Soyuz rocket is seen after being rolled out by train to the launch pad, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018 at...

« Previous
1
4
5
Paragon Space Development Corporation

Commercial Crew Development Round 1 (CCDev1) Space Act Agreement

NNJ10TA03S

Paragon Space Development Corporation CCDev1 Space Act Agreement

Paragon Space Development Corporation SAA Amendment 01
**UNPUBLISHED**
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 08**  **- 8175** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. SHAWNSY DEVON MITCHELL , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the East ern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00009

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : March 31 , 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER , SHEDD , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinio n . Shawnsy Devon Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Colombell Marshall, Stephen Wiley Miller, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney s , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Shawnsy Devon Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
. Because his appeal is moot, we dismiss the appeal. Mitchell pleaded guilty in April 2003. He was sentenced to ninety months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release. Mitchell served his active sentence and was released on November 18, 2009 , while this appeal was in abeyance pending decision in another appeal
. Because Mitchell has completed the conf inement portion of his sentence, his argument that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for reduction of sentence is moot. * Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We deny Mitchell’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Our decision is without prejudice to any future motion Mitchell may file f or early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) (2006)
.
Order filed July 11, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00463-CV

____________

JAWED MANJLAI, Appellant

V.

NABILA HAMID MANJLAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-44182

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed July 2, 2013. Our review has determined that a 

relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). 

The record does not contain Jawed Manjlai’s Motion for Judgment 

Notwithstanding the Verdict, and in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial filed 

on or about March 14, 2013. (The record contains the response to the motion filed 

April 26, 2013.)
2

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before July 31, 2013, containing Jawed Manjlai’s Motion for 

Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, and in the Alternative, Motion for a New 

Trial filed on or about March 14, 2013.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1762

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month 

waiting period in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2003

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. BAYH, and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the five-month waiting period in the disability insurance 

program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Act 

5 Improvements for the Terminally Ill Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR 

7 TERMINALLY ILL INDIVIDUALS. 

8 Section 223(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 423(a)) is amended—
2

•S 1762 IS 

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘he meets 

2 the requirements of paragraph (3), or’’ after ‘‘but 

3 only if’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), an individual 

7 meets the requirements of this paragraph if—

8 ‘‘(i) the impairment underlying a finding that 

9 the individual is under a disability results in his 

10 death prior to the end of the applicable period de11 scribed in subparagraph (B), or 

12 ‘‘(ii)(I) in the case where such finding is made 

13 before the end of the applicable period, the Commis14 sioner determines that, at the time such finding is 

15 made, such impairment is expected to result in the 

16 individual’s death prior to the end of such period, or 

17 ‘‘(II) in the case where such finding is made 

18 after the end of the applicable period, the Commis19 sioner determines that, at any time during such pe20 riod, such impairment was expected to result in the 

21 individual’s death prior to the end of such period. 

22 ‘‘(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), the ‘ap23 plicable period’ is the period of the first six consecutive 

24 calendar months throughout which such individual is 

25 under a disability by reason of such impairment which be-
3

•S 1762 IS 

1 gins not earlier than the first day of the period described 

2 in subsection (c)(2)(B).’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

5 with respect to applications filed after the date of the en6 actment of this Act.

Æ
#### Gould & Davenport *v.*W. B. Baird.

New Trial — Casualty — Misfortune — Petition — Valid Defense — Answer — Demurrer.

The failure of counsel to put in a defense (no doubt resulting from casualty or accident), where it is not alleged that appellants or their counsel were unavoidably prevented from making a defense, will not warrant a reversal.

Same Where a petition exhibits the answer which was prepared by the attorney to be filed, but fails to set forth the petition on which the default judgment was rendered, the court cannot know whether the defense thus undisclosed was a bar to the action or not.

APPEAL EROM MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 10, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

The facts alleged in the petition were clearly insufficient to .authorize the court to vacate or modify the judgment complained of, unless they bring the case within the provisions of the seventh .subdivision of section 579 of the Civil Code, conferring power on .the court to vacate or modify a judgment “ for unavoidable casualty or misfortune, preventing the party from appearing or defending,” and moreover disclose a valid defense to the action as ■.required by section 581 of the Civil Code.

Although the failure of the appellants’ counsel to put in the -defense, which appears to have been contemplated, may have, and >no doubt did, result from casualty or accident, it is difficult to -deduce, from the facts alleged, how such casualty could have been ■ unavoidable, as it is not made to appear that either the appellants -or their counsel were unavoidably prevented from knowing at least during the term what disposition had been made of the ease.

But, for another reason, we think: the demurrer to the petition was properly sustained. While the petition exhibits the answer, which it alleges was prepared by appellants’ attorney to be filed, it fails to exhibit or set forth the petition of the appellee so that *91the court could know whether the defense disclosed was sufficient to bar the action or not.

*Harlan &*Harlan, *for appellants.*

Wherefore, perceiving no error in the judgment, the same is •affirmed.
#### Kent *v.*The State.

Indictment against a magistrate, under the statute of 1838, for not filing in the clerk’s office, in due time, a certificate of the solemnization of a marriage: The indictment showed that three months and fourteen days had elapsed from the time of the marriage to the filing of the certificate. *Held,*that the indictment could not be sustained.

ERROR to the *Shelby*Circuit Court.

*J. Morrison*and *S. Major,*for the plaintiff. *A. A. Hammond*and *J. H. Bradley,*for the state.

Perkins, J.

Indictment for failing to return a marriage certificate. Motion to quash overruled. Plea, guilty, and fine assessed by the Court.

The indictment shows it to have been but three months and fourteen days from the time of the marriage to the filing of the certificate. The statute on which the indictment is founded, R. S. 1838, p. 411, requires, by sects. 6 and 8, that the certificate of marriage shall be filed in the clerk’s office of the proper county in three months from the solemnization of the marriage, and imposes a penalty of five dollars a month for delay after the said three months ;• and the question is, whether any fine can be imposed for a delay of less than a full month from the expiration of the three months ? The Court below held the affirmative, and assessed a fine of two dollars and a half for the half month.

We think the Court erred. This is a penal statute and must be strictly construed. It certainly is not clear that a penalty is inflicted by it till the end of the fourth month’s delay; and if it is ambiguous, and susceptible of two constructions consistent with reason, one of which will acquit and the other convict the defendant, that construction which will acquit must be adopted.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00267-CV

IN RE KELLY MEDIA GROUP, INC. 

AND JASON CARDIFF

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

This court’s stay order issued July 3, 2012, is hereby lifted.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 20, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019 on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019 , does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofGuggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019.

Date:March 14, 2019/s/ Matthew S. BloomMATTHEW S. BLOOMChief Executive OfficerDate:March 14, 2019/s/ Brian S. WilliamsBRIAN S. WILLIAMSChief Financial Officer
International Space Station Anniversary: Emoji Math

On Nov. 2, NASA celebrates the anniversary of the International Space Station. 

Solve the puzzles below to learn facts about the orbiting outpost!

Want to learn more about the space station?

Check out the facts and figures at https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/overview/index.html.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH BORATTO AND MARTIN SILVERMAN.

May 16, 1978.

Cross-Petition for certification granted. (See 154 *N. J. Super.*386)
| X-1 Home
 Bibliography

 Human Element

 Photo Gallery

 Reports

 The X Programs |  | X-Plane Projects At Dryden
 History of the X Plane Program

 Summary Table of the X-Planes

 Dryden Research Aircraft Gallery: *Cool movies and photos of X-planes*

NASA news

This Week in Dryden's History -- Facts About Dryden's Accomplishments

Updated January 22, 2010
For further information contact histinfo@hq.nasa.gov or Steve Garber, NASA History Office, steve.garber@hq.nasa.gov |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., FOR THE THREE AND NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,124,700
<SECURITIES>                                   797,778
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,352,331
<PP&E>                                       9,444,797
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,858,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,295,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,368,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,035
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,930,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,295,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,993,231
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,176,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             617,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,043,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,043,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,043,569)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           23,745
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,026,484
<PP&E>                                           12,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,038,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           425,796
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      2,654,548
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,038,608
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 61,708
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,088,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,026,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2,041,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.14)




</TABLE>