alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,113,200
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    253,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,645,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,062,600
<PP&E>                                         1,067,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (417,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10,306,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            659,500
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             13,800
<PREFERRED>                                    2,797,300
<COMMON>                                          15,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,049,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10,306,700
<SALES>                                          362,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 520,100
<CGS>                                             46,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,193,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,443,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (9,117,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (9,117,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (9,117,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.67)



</TABLE>
---

## Ian Cossor



---

Born at Albury, New South Wales, Australia. I was nine years old at the time of Apollo 11. A highly motivated school teacher went to great lengths to explain the significance of the Apollo program to my class and watching Armstong and Aldrin walk on the moon forged a deep and lasting interest in space and science generally.

Ian CossorI was fortunate enough to meet Eric and when he explained the evolution of the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal I offered my assistance, small as it is, to help with the graphics on the web site. I have 25 years experience in graphics, working originally as a signwriter but mostly as a graphic artist and in the last few years as a web designer.

It has been a great pleasure helping Eric with the look of the ALSJ site.

22 September 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1322
NSONSA KISALA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HIGH'S DAIRIES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a East Coast Ice Cream, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1320-JFM) Submitted: August 30, 1996 Decided: October 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nsonsa Kisala, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew William Oakey, Thomas N. Biddison, Jr., GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nsonsa Kisala appeals from the district court order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his employment discrimination action alleging constructive discharge based on race, national origin, and the exercise of constitutional rights, and unequal pay based on race and national origin. He also argues that the districtcourt's grant of summary judgment prior to resolution of an outstanding motion to compel discovery constitutes a denial of due process. The Defendant argues that contrary to Kisala's assertion, he did not resign, but rather was terminated for poor performance and inability to function with his co-workers. The district court accepted the Defendant's version of termination and examinedKisala's claim as one of discriminatory discharge. We have considered both versions of Kisala's departure, reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment as to his claims of discharge, constructive or otherwise, based on race and national origin. Turning to the remaining claims of constructive discharge for the exercise of constitutional rights and unequal pay based on race in violation of Title VII, we again find that Kisala has failed to establish a prima facie case. Finally, we find that any error which may have occurred in the grant of summary judgment prior to the resolution of Kisala's motion to compel discovery was harmless and does not warrant reversal.3 Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Balance  Sheet at March 31, 1997  (unaudited)  and the  Condensed
Statement of Operations for the quarter ended  March 31, 1997 (unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000892160                         
<NAME>                            Derma Sciences, Inc.                       
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                               131,382       
<SECURITIES>                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        851,698                        
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          805,020         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3,958,950        
<PP&E>                               110,538       
<DEPRECIATION>                             0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,767,582        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              2,018,131        
<BONDS>                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                0 
<COMMON>                              40,676      
<OTHER-SE>                         2,613,775        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4,767,582       
<SALES>                              751,733       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     751,733       
<CGS>                                183,855       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        183,855       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    16,492      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (366,357)        
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (366,357)        
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0 
<CHANGES>                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                        (366,357)        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.09)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0 
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 12, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00061-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JACKSON CONATSER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-1-0354

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s May 7, 2021 second motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief filed by 

May 17, 2021.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 23, 2005 

PATRICK FISHER 

Clerk 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

V. 

TERRELLE VINSON MARTIN, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 04-1348 

(D. Colorado) 

(D.C. No. 03-CR-252-D) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before SEYMOUR, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges. 

Defendant Terrelle Vinson Martin was convicted after a jury trial of 

unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). 

Because Defendant has multiple prior felony convictions, he was designated an 

armed career criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 924( e). His resulting total offense level, 

33, and criminal history category, VI, yielded a guidelines range of 235-293 

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The case is 

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is 

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and 

judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and 

conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 04-1348 Document: 010110642429 Date Filed: 05/23/2005 Page: 1
months' imprisonment. The district court sentenced Defendant to the 23 5-month 

minimum sentence. 

Before the sentencing hearing Defendant filed a motion arguing that in 

light of Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), the Sentencing Guidelines 

were unconstitutional. The district court denied the motion and Defendant 

appeals. 

While this matter was on appeal the United States Supreme Court handed 

down United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The government concedes 

that United States v. Labastida-Segura, 396 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2005), requires 

Defendant's case to be remanded for resentencing. 

We agree and REMAND to the district court for resentencing. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Harris L Hartz 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 04-1348 Document: 010110642429 Date Filed: 05/23/2005 Page: 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Timothy A. Larkin, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Warren
Resources, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over the financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors:  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. /s/ Timothy A. LarkinTimothy A. Larkin,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 December 7, 2004 A signed original of this original statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Warren
Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Warren Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 4
Exhibit 12.1


                            AES Eastern Energy, L.P.
            Statements Regarding Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
                  (Amounts in Thousands, Except Ratio Amounts)


<TABLE>
                                            Year Ended       Year Ended       Year Ended
                                           Dec. 31, 2002    Dec. 31, 2001    Dec. 31, 2000
                                           -------------    -------------    -------------
<S>                                          <C>              <C>               <C>
Income from Continuing Operations            $ 58,630         $ 51,865          $ 98,237

Add:  Fixed Charges                          $ 57,694           58,434            57,314
Add:  Amortization of Capitalized Interest          -                -               173
Less: Interest Capitalized                          -                -                 -
                                             --------         --------          --------
Earnings                                      116,324          110,299           155,724
                                             --------         --------          --------

Fixed Charges:
Add:  Interest expense and
      capitalized amounts (including
      construction related fixed
      charges)                                 57,694           58,434            57,314
Add: Interest capitalized                           -                -                 -
                                             --------         --------          --------
Total Fixed Charges                          $ 57,694         $ 58,434          $ 57,314
                                             =========        ========          ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               2.02             1.89              2.72
                                             =========        ========          ========
</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1846

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of serviceconnection for certain veterans with Hepatitis C, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 11, 2003

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of service-connection for certain veterans with 

Hepatitis C, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION FOR 

4 CERTAIN VETERANS WITH HEPATITIS C. 

5 (a) PRESUMPTION.—Section 1112 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(d)(1) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, 

9 and subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, 

10 the disease Hepatitis C becoming manifest to a degree of 
2

•S 1846 IS 

1 10 percent or more in any veteran described in paragraph 

2 (2) after active military, naval, or air service covered by 

3 that paragraph shall be considered to have been incurred 

4 in or aggravated by such service, notwithstanding that 

5 there is no record of evidence of that disease during such 

6 service. 

7 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies in the case of the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(A) Veterans who received during a period of 

10 service before December 31, 1992, a transfusion of 

11 blood or blood products. 

12 ‘‘(B) Veterans who were exposed to blood 

13 through the skin during a period of service. 

14 ‘‘(C) Veterans who underwent hemodialysis dur15 ing a period of service. 

16 ‘‘(D) Veterans who experienced a needle-stick 

17 injury, not due to the veteran’s own willful mis18 conduct, during a period of service. 

19 ‘‘(E) Veterans diagnosed with unexplained liver 

20 disease during a period of service. 

21 ‘‘(F) Veterans who served in a health-care posi22 tion or specialty during a period of service under 

23 such circumstances as the Secretary shall prescribe 

24 for purposes of this subsection.’’. 
3

•S 1846 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact3 ment of this Act. No benefit may be paid or provided by 

4 reason of that amendment for any period before such date.

Æ
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Astronauts, cosmonauts and many others worked to make Shuttle-Mir         a success. The following is a list of pages with their profiles and biographies,         which present their contributions and backgrounds. 

STS           Mission Commanders

Cosmonauts

U.S.           Mir Residents

Directors           and Team Members |  |
| | TOC | Site         Map |         Photo Gallery | Video Gallery         | Diagrams | Welcome         | Search |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
# STS-47 Endeavour, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 105, landing sequence at KSC SLF

STS047-S-116 (20 Sept 1992) --- The Space Shuttle Endeavour prepares to land on the Kennedy Space Center's Shuttle landing facility runway.  The successful landing marked the completion of an eight-day Earth-orbital mission for the orbiter, its seven-member crew and the Spacelab-J payload.  Landing occurred at 8:53 a.m.  (EDT), September 20, 1992.  Onboard the spacecraft were astronauts Robert L. Gibson, Curtis L. Brown Jr., Mark C. Lee, Jerome (Jay) Apt, N. Jan Davis and Mae C. Jemison, along with Japanese payload specialist Dr. Mamoru Mohri.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts047-s-116/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 20, 1992ProducerJSCSize1920x1312pxPIA Numbersts047-s-116The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Paper Airplane Template

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Students

## Grade Levels

Grades K-4, Informal Education

## Subject

Physical Science, Flight and Aeronautics

## Type

Hands-on Activities

### Paper Airplane Template

Print out this Paper Airplane Template. Fold along the solid lines in the prescribed order (1, 2, 3...) always folding to the inside. Cover the numbers with the folds.

(NASA Glenn PA-2L)

Paper Airplane Template
# Fourth Court of Appeals San An tonio, Texas

August 28, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00275

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.C, JR., S.R.C., E.D.C., CHILDREN

,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00862 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was filed on August 5, 201 9, making appellee’s brief due August 26, 2019. The appellee has filed a motion for extension of time requesting a twenty

- one day extension to file its brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief must be filed no later than September 16, 2019

. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the se al of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH TROY HOLMES, JR., 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN JONES, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

No. 10-6019

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00512-D)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-6019 Document: 01018413973 Date Filed: 05/03/2010 Page: 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHRISTOPHER TALFORD.

May *2,*1978.

Petition for certification denied.