alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BREWSTER H. SHAW

VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL MANAGER SPACE EXPLORATION

BOEING, HOUSTON, TEXAS

Brewster Shaw is vice president and general manager, Space Exploration, for 

Integrated Defense Systems at The Boeing Company. He is responsible for the 

strategic direction of Boeing's civil space programs and support of NASA programs 

such as Space Shuttle, International Space Station (ISS), Checkout, Assembly & 

Payload Processing Services (CAPPS), Constellation and Ares. Shaw, a former 

astronaut, was appointed to this position in January 2006.

Previously, Shaw was chief operating officer of United Space Alliance (USA) and had 

primary responsibility for the day-to-day operations and overall management of USA, 

the prime contractor for the Space Shuttle Program.

Before his time at USA, Shaw served as vice president and deputy general manager for 

Boeing NASA Systems. Prior to that, he was Boeing ISS vice president and general 

manager, responsible for leading an industry team in designing, developing, testing, launching, and operating NASA’s 

international orbiting laboratory.

Shaw has held multiple management and executive roles since he joined Rockwell in 1996 after 27 years with the U.S. Air 

Force and NASA. He retired from the Air Force as a colonel.

During his government career, Shaw served as combat fighter pilot, test pilot and Space Shuttle astronaut and program 

manager. As an astronaut, Shaw flew three Space Shuttle missions – as pilot of STS-9 in November 1983, as commander of 

STS-61B in November 1985, and as commander of STS-28 in August 1989. He played a key role in returning the Shuttle to 

flight following the STS-51L, Challenger tragedy, leading the Space Shuttle orbiter return to flight team. Shaw has logged 

533 hours of space flight and more than 5,000 hours flying time in over 30 types of aircraft -- including 644 hours of combat 

in F-100 and F-4 aircraft.

Shaw is the recipient of many exemplary awards for serving his country in the United States Air Force and with NASA.

Shaw received a bachelor’s of Science degree in 1968 and a master’s of Science degree in 1969, both in engineering 

mechanics from the University of Wisconsin.

Shaw was born May 16, 1945, in Cass City, Michigan.

NOVEMBER 2008

This is the only information available from NASA. For updates please contact:

Ed Memi

Space Exploration

(281) 226-4029

edmund.g.memi@boeing.com

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of Coastal Banking Company, Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, tohis knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

 

1.     Theamendment to the annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | August5, 2005 |   | By:                                   | /s/ Randolph C. Kohn   |   |
|--------|---------------|--------|---------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   |          |   | Randolph C. Kohn                      |
|   |          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |          |   |                                  |
| Date:  | August5, 2005 |   | By:                                   | /s/ James L. Pate, III |   |
|   |          |   | James L. Pate, III                    |
|   |          |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----
Recommendation: 

NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

International Involvement 

2012-01-03 (HEOC-03) 

The Council recommends identifying an existing International Space Station (ISS) 

International Partner( s) to accelerate expansion of international participation in future 

deep-space exploration planning. This expanded partnership will bring international 

resources to exploration and enhance sustainability. For any mission that is selected, 

additional hardware is needed beyond the Space Launch System (SLS) and MultiPurpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) such as a lander, habitat, advanced propulsion systems, 

etc. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

History has shown that International Partnerships have been effective. On ISS the 

partners have provided additional pressurized elements (i.e., laboratories, nodes and 

logistics modules), launch vehicles (i.e., Soyuz, Proton, Ariane-5, H2), cargo/crew 

transfer vehicles (i.e., Soyuz Transport Modified Anthropometric [TMA], Automated 

Transfer Vehicle [ATV], H2 Transfer Vehicle (HTV]), navigation systems, ground 

control centers, robotic systems, and training facilities. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Limited U.S. resources will delay exploration ofthe solar system. Additionally, strength 

of international treaties will benefit sustainability of exploration programs. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with the intent of this recommendation. Discussions with the 

international community via both the ISS Multilateral Control Board's action to assess 

future exploration planning (part of the ISS Expert Working Group - Team 4) and 

multilateral International Space Exploration Coordination Group are both ongoing and 

productive. International Partnerships are a vital component of a robust, affordable, and 

sustainable human space exploration program and a key part of NASA's forward 

planning. Further partnerships will be established when the programmatic, political, 

economic, and technical factors align. 

Enclosure
#### NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD v. ROBERT POWELL.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Newkirk and Another *v.*Johnson and Another, Executors.

Debt against the executors of *Cooper*on a promissory nolo payable to the plaintiffs, executed by the testator and *Farmer*by the name of *Cooper*& *Farmer.*The declaration averred that the makers were dead, *Farmer*having died first; and that the makers had not, nor had either of them, paid the note, nor had the defendants or either of them paid it. *Held,*that the declaration was not objectionable for not alleging the non-payment by the representatives of *Farmer.*

*Tuesday, July*28.

APPEAL from the *Montgomery*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Debt on a promissory note payable to the plaintiffs. The declaration states that the note was executed by *Cooper*(the defendants’ testator) and one *Farmer,*by the name and style of *Cooper*& *Farmer;*that *Farmer*died and *Cooper*survived him; that *Cooper*afterwards died, leaving the defendants his executors. Breach, that *Cooper*and *Farmer*had not, nor had either of them, paid the note; nor had the defendants or either of them paid, &c. General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendants.

The appellee's contend that the non-payment by the representatives of *Farmer*should havé been averred. This *363objection is founded on the statute, which makes the representatives of a deceased joint obligor as liable as if the obligation had been joint and several; Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 358. A sufficient answer to this objection is — that it does not appear by the declaration that there are any legal representatives of *Farmer;*nor is it to be presumed that there áre any such representatives; If there are any, and they have paid the note, the deféndants can show those facts by their plea.

*W. M.*Jenners, for the appellants.

*II. S. Lane*and *S. C. Willson,*for the appellees.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed' with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               296,996
<SECURITIES>                                         2,726,015
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       27,523,730<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           27,431,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         27,523,730<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     150,900<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     251,269<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,171,215)<F5>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (22.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Included in Total Assets is Investments in Local Limited  Partnerships of $24,192,589,  Restricted cash of $272,555
and Other assets of $35,575.
<F2>Included  in Total  Liabilities  and Equity is Accounts  payable to affiliates of $54,063 and Accounts  payable and
accrued expenses of $37,697.
<F3>Included in Total revenue is Investment of $86,217 and Other of $64,683.
<F4>Included  in Other  Expenses is Asset  management  fees of $147,776,  General and  administrative  of $87,401,  and
Amortization of $16,092.
<F5>Included in Net loss is Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships of $1,070,846.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRAFEM,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,095,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  869,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                    85,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,714,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,782,149
<PP&E>                                      13,483,602
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,406,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,032,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,013,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,710
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,360,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,032,702
<SALES>                                      3,263,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,263,976
<CGS>                                        2,059,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,399,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (287,803)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,854,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,854,903)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,854,903)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) ncb National Cooperative Bank | 2011 Crystal DriveSuite, 800 Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 26, 2016

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor 

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor 

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance WFRBS 2014 C22

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2016.

 

 

Best regards, 

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1877

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the enrollment of 

cropland into the conservation reserve program through the farmable 

wetlands program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2003

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry 

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the 

enrollment of cropland into the conservation reserve program through the farmable wetlands program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FARMABLE WETLANDS PROGRAM. 

4 (a) INCLUSION OF PLAYAS.—Section 

5 1231(h)(2)(A)(i) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

6 U.S.C. 3831(h)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting after 

7 ‘‘section 1222(b)(1)(A)’’ the following: ‘‘and a playa (re8 gardless of whether the playa is listed on a map described 

9 in subparagraph (B))’’. 
2

•S 1877 IS 

1 (b) MAXIMUM SIZE OF WETLAND.—Section 

2 1231(h)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

3 U.S.C. 3831(h)(2)(D)(i)(I)) is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘10 contiguous acres’’ and in5 serting ‘‘40 contiguous acres’’; and 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘5 acres’’ and inserting ‘‘20 

7 acres’’.

Æ
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 12, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ECAST SETTLEMENT

CORPORATION, assignee of FIA Card

Services, a/k/a Bank of America and

Wells Fargo Card Services,

 Petitioner, 

v. 

PETER ALBERT HELMUT LIEHR, JR.; 

KAREN KAY LIEHR, 

 Respondents.

____________________________

SALLY J. ZEMAN,

 Petitioner 

v. 

PETER ALBERT HELMUT LIEHR, JR.;

KAREN KAY LIEHR, 

 Respondents

No. 10-501

No. 10-502

ORDER

Before MURPHY, HARTZ, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

Appellate Case: 10-502 Document: 01018400774 Date Filed: 04/12/2010 Page: 1 
2

The petitions by eCAST Settlement Corporation and Sally J. Zeman, Trustee, for

permission to appeal are DENIED.

Judge Murphy dissents.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-502 Document: 01018400774 Date Filed: 04/12/2010 Page: 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TRAVELERS UNITED, INC., Plaintiff,

v. HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC., et al. , Defendants. Civil Action No. 23

- 3584 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell

ORDER Upon consideration of plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, ECF No. 11 , the related legal memoranda in support and in opposition , the parties’ positions at the hearing held on May 8, 2024, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion , it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand , ECF No. 11 , is GRANTED ; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

SO ORDERED. This is a final and appealable order

. Date: June 7, 2024

__________________________ BERYL A. HOWELL U nited S tates District Judge
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001
February 11, 2020

General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the
United Launch Alliance Satellite 2020 Reception on March 10, 2020

On March 10, 2020, United Launch Alliance (ULA) will host an event at the National
Portrait Museum, in Washington, DC, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. The estimated value of the
event, including all food and drink, is approximately $73 per person. The event is to
provide a forum for continuing discussion on the program presented at the 2020 ULA
Satellite Conference. ULA is in control of all the arrangements and invitations for the
event.

Approximately 1250 people have been invited to attend the event. Attendees will have a
diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from federal agencies, members
from the legislative branch, representatives from industry, academia, and professional
societies and associations. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to
exchange information regarding various NASA programs. There is also an Agency interest
in having NASA personnel attend this event because it will provide an opportunity for the
invited persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and
operations. I find that this event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering”
as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g).

Accordingly, NASA employees, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the
interests of ULA, may accept an invitation for free attendance to this event. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that
the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of
their duties.

However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13770, may only attend if they reimburse the hosts the value
of the event. Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending
matter affecting the interests of ULA, such as procurement duties, program management, or
negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination
from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation under the
widely attended gathering exception.


Attendees (other than non-career employees in positions which requires signing the ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13770) are also reminded of the $20 gift exception at

5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a), at which provides that employees may accept gift items valued at
no more than $20 per occasion (and no more than $50 from one source in a calendar year).
We understand there will be a coffee mug valued at approximately $10.00, a coaster valued
at approximately $1.00, and an ULA pin valued at $.79, for a total of $11.79, given to
attendees at the reception.

BAA-Z

Adam F, Greenstone
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   500,020
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2,238,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       113,990,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                            69,243,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         113,990,420
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      17,835,277
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      11,963,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         118,564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     2,747,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        3,005,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    3,005,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                           3,005,366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        


</TABLE>