alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1768 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

  1st Session

                                S. 1768

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 21, 2003.

    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1768) entitled ``An Act to 
extend the national flood insurance program'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension.--The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 is amended 
as follows:
            (1) Authority for contracts.--In section 1319 (42 U.S.C. 
        4026), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``March 
        31, 2004.''.
            (2) Borrowing authority.--In the first sentence of section 
        1309(a) (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``the date specified in section 1319''.
            (3) Emergency implementation.--In section 1336(a) (42 
        U.S.C. 4056(a)), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and 
        inserting ``on the date specified in section 1319''.
            (4) Authorization of appropriations for studies.--In 
        section 1376(c) (42 U.S.C. 4127(c)), by striking ``December 31, 
        2003'' and inserting ``the date specified in section 1319''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
considered to have taken effect on December 31, 2003.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

June 27, 2022

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Jet

Propulsion Laboratory Celebrating 25 Years on Mars Reception on
July 27, 2022

On July 27, 2022, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), will host a reception at the Library of
Congress, Thomas Jefferson Building in Washington, DC, starting at 6:30 p.m. The event
will provide a forum for informal discussion on the 25 years of continuous presence and
scientific exploration of Mars.

Approximately 1,000 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, and
academia. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is $70 per
person. JPL is in control of the organizing, planning and invitations for this event.
Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding
various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements of a “widely attended
gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). I further determine that there is an
Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event because it will provide an
opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s
policies, programs and operations.

NASA employees, including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to
sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a
matter affecting the interests of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for
themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest
in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be,
improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the JPL, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or
administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local
ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation.


Attendees are reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a) which provides
that employees may accept gifts valued at no more than $20 per occasion (and no more than
$50 from one source in a calendar year). We understand JPL will being handing out a poster
and desk ornament that can be accepted as presentation items, as well as a gift tote bag
($5.00) that can be accepted if the individual is within the above stated monetary limits.

Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual
situation.

Adam F. Greenstone
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE
29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                             119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      198
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   902
<PP&E>                                           3,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,436)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,067
<SALES>                                            695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   695
<CGS>                                               23
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       23
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,395,018
<SECURITIES>                                    21,510,741
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,852,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9,626
<INVENTORY>                                      3,974,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,440,705
<PP&E>                                          22,263,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,157,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,546,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,133,438
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,757,227
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,300,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,546,772
<SALES>                                          3,213,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,158,688
<CGS>                                            2,501,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,501,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,965,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 157,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,883,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,883,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,883,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.47)


</TABLE>
1 min read

# NASA Aeronautics Monthly STEM Newsletter

### Lillian Gipson

#### Web Editor

Apr 02, 2024

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**2024**

NASA Aeronautics Monthly STEM Newsletter: Issue 37 (June)

NASA Aeronautics Monthly STEM Newsletter: Issue 36 (May)

NASA Aeronautics Monthly STEM Newsletter: Issue 35 (April)

NASA Aeronautics Monthly STEM Newsletter: Issue 34 (March)

Aeronautics STEM

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

2 min readNASA Joins National Space Council in Celebration of Black Space WeekArticle										3 days ago									

3 min readJohnson Celebrates LGBTQI+ Pride Month: Meet Michael ChandlerArticle										3 days ago									

4 min readJohnson Celebrates LGBTQI+ Pride Month: Meet Margaret KennedyArticle										3 days ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space

Aeronautics STEM

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - General
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of UNR Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Alexey Alekseevich Kim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Alexey Alekseevich KimAlexey Alekseevich Kim

Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2010









[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UNR Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by UNR Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB

I, Edward J.
Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2002 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) upon my best
knowledge and belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  August 14, 2002 | /s/ Edward J.
     QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman,
     President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance Companies, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Riddiford, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David M. Riddiford
EXHIBIT 32

# CERTIFICATION

| | The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |                                                         |  |  |                          | 
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------ | 
|Date:   November 5, 2004 |                                                         |  |  | /s/   Bernard P. Aldrich | 
|                         |                                                        
|                         | Bernard P. AldrichPresident and Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:   November 5, 2004 |                                                         |  |  | /s/   Robert M. Wolf     | 
|                         |                                                        
|                         | Robert M. WolfChief Financial Officer                   | 



---
#### Ahmed OPETUBO, Appellant, v. CITIBANK STUDENT LOAN CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-5049.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2003.

Ahmed Opetubo, Brooklyn, NY, pro se.

Daniel Fisher, Pullman & Comley (Sheila A. Denton, Pullman & Comley, on the brief), Bridgeport, Connecticut, for defendant-appellee Educational Credit Management Corporation, for Appellee.

Present: NEWMAN, CARDAMONE, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Plaintiff-Appellant Ahmed Opetubo appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Ross, *J.)*affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of a discharge of Opetubo’s student loan obligation. The district court determined that Opetubo failed to demonstrate that he would suffer undue hardship under this Court’s three-part test in *Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp.,*831 F.2d 395, 396 (2d Cir.1997) (establishing that in order to demonstrate that repaying the loan would cause “undue hardship” under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8), debtor must show that (1) he cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a minimal standard of living for himself and his dependents if forced to repay the loans; (2) additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period for the student loans; and (3) the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans). On appeal, Opetubo argues that the district court erred in finding that he failed to meet the *Brunner*test and seeks *146a determination of the balance due on the defaulted loan.

When reviewing orders of district courts in their capacity as appellate courts in bankruptcy cases, this Court reviews determinations of law *de novo*and determinations of fact for clear error. *See In re Burger Boys, Inc.,*94 F.3d 755, 759 (2d Cir.1996). As an initial matter, this Court will not consider the additional evidence Opetubo submitted on appeal because the majority of the documents reflect changes in Opetubo’s financial circumstances after the bankruptcy and district court decisions. *See Brunner,*831 F.2d at 396 (holding that the inquiry is based on debtor’s “current income and expenses.”). Moreover, several of the exhibits concerning the correct balance due on the loan were not submitted to the bankruptcy or district courts, and therefore, would not clarify this Court’s “understanding of the process by which the District Judge reached the decision challenged on appeal.” *See Salinger v. Random House,*818 F.2d 252, 253 (2d Cir.1987) (noting that parties may supplement a record on appeal pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 10(e) if anything material is omitted from or misstated in the record). Accordingly, no grounds exist to find that the district court or the bankruptcy court erred in calculating Opetubo’s loan balance.

We find no clear error in the district court’s application of *Brunner*and affirm the non-dischargeability of the student loan obligation substantially for the reasons stated by the bankruptcy and district court judges.

For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Order entered May 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01400-CR

JOSE DELAPAZ REYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-58294-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On May 21, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief had not been filed. We have received appellant’s brief, together with an extension motion. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the May 21, 2015 order 

requiring findings.

We note that appellant was convicted of continuing sexual abuse of a child. 

Nevertheless, appellant’s brief contains the complete name of the complaining witness rather 

than her initials. Accordingly, we DENY the extension motion as moot.
We STRIKE the appellant’s brief tendered on May 26, 2015 and ORDER counsel to 

file, by JUNE 1, 2015, an amended brief that is redacted to contain only the initials of the 

complaining witness.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Christian Souza and to the Dallas 

County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                          2,924,498
<SECURITIES>                   13,189,136
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,169,520
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     3,773,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               22,846,298
<PP&E>                         19,944,414
<DEPRECIATION>                  3,905,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 38,885,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,907,843
<BONDS>                         2,967,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                        1,381,576
<OTHER-SE>                     30,627,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   38,885,043
<SALES>                         1,005,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,287,034
<CGS>                             834,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,436,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 97,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,961,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,961,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,961,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.22)
        


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6768** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOHNNY JUNIOR WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr - 00295

- BO

- 1; 5:13

- cv - 00014

- BO )

Submitted : October 29, 2013 Decided: November 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Johnny Junior Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jane J. Jackson, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Rudy E. Renfer, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North C arolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnny Junior Williams appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No s . 5:08

- cr - 00295

- BO

- 01 ; 5:13

- cv - 00014

- BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013)
. We deny Williams’ motion to expand the certificate of appea lability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 87-1043.

#### United States *v.*Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350




The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the preceding Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Financial Corporation.





/s/ Dennis A. Long

/s/ Denise PortmannDennis A. Long

Denise PortmannPresident and

Chief Financial OfficerChief Executive Officer

March 21, 2011March 21, 2011
#### VIRGINIA SCHANER AND FREDERICK SCHANER v. MAYFAIR SUPERMARKETS AND N.J. AUTOMATIC DOOR, CO.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.