alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,183
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      8,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,295
<PP&E>                                           2,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                     479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,220
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,554
<SALES>                                          6,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,266
<CGS>                                            3,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                       501
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Anthony Giaccone, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28123-A.

Vs. No. 11-22-00238-CR * July 27, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002Laurel Capital Group, Inc.In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Edwin R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodcovered by the Report.   /s/ Edwin R. Maus     Edwin R. Maus  President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Colorado  Community  Broadcasting,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  April 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report").  I, Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Rao Mankal, CFO

Dated:  November 19, 2004
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Biography

Image Credit: NASA/Keegan Barber

Mr. Sultan is responsible for NASA’s aviation operations and safety research portfolio of 

more than $120 million across four research centers. The Airspace Operations and Safety 

Program (AOSP) works with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and industry 

and academic partners to conceive and develop Next Generation Air Transportation Sys-

tem (NextGen) technologies to further improve the safety of current and future aircraft 

moving through the National Airspace System.

NextGen activity includes research to enable service oriented architecture and integrated 

demand management operational efficiencies in the surface, terminal, en route, and oce-

anic operational domains for traditional aircraft, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), and 

future autonomous systems. The program is also responsible for aviation safety research 

in the areas of aircraft state awareness, prevention of aircraft loss of control, verification 

and validation of complex systems, prognostic safety through data mining, and real-time 

system-wide safety assurance. A key focus is on developing and demonstrating enhanced 

systems that will enable routine access to the airspace by emergent users of UAS, espe-

cially in support of evolving urban air mobility concepts.

Sultan is the NASA co-lead on the NASA/FAA Research Transition Teams, which are 

organized to enable efficient and effective transition of NASA research into FAA imple-

mentation roadmaps. 

He is also the NASA liaison to the multiagency NextGen Interagency Planning Office, 

and leads the program’s international collaboration activities. 

Sultan has 20 years of professional experience in aerospace and air traffic management 

research and development. 

Previously, Sultan was a NASA liaison to the Joint Planning and Development Office 

in the ongoing development of NextGen, where he led the development of NextGen 

operational improvements. He also served as the Software Configuration, Release, and 

Verification and Validation Manager for the Terminal Radar Approach Control automa-

tion system at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California. There he was responsible for 

gaining FAA certification for NASA prototype systems in operational field trials. 

Sultan received two Bachelor of Science degrees, in Mechanical Engineering and in 

Aeronautical Science and Engineering, from the University of California Davis, and a 

Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering from San José State University.

Mr. Akbar Sultan

Director, Airspace Operations and Safety Program (AOSP)

NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          1,379,300
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,016,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,452,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,216,482
<PP&E>                                            352,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  7,269,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,307,054
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        46,958
<COMMON>                                           66,297
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,849,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    7,269,931
<SALES>                                         5,036,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,036,540
<CGS>                                           1,916,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,916,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,514,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,514,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,514,883)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.024)



</TABLE>
# STS-31 crew monitors Hubble Space Telescope (HST) from OV-103’s flight deck

STS031-10-027 (24-29 April 1990) --- A "fish eye" lens captured this overall view of the aft flight deck of Space Shuttle Discovery while the crewmembers were monitoring the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) deployment checkout procedures. From front to back are astronauts Loren J. Shriver, commander, and Steven A. Hawley and MS Bruce McCandless II, both mission specialists, looking up at overhead windows and the HST on the remote manipulator system (RMS) outside them.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s31-10-027/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 29, 1990ProducerJSCSize1920x1284pxPIA NumberS31-10-027The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Harvest Time

NASA astronaut Steve Swanson, Expedition 40 commander, harvests a crop of red romaine lettuce plants that were grown from seed inside the station's Veggie facility

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/harvest-time/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x691pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 18, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Violet and her best friend, Alden, 

have been playing all day on their 

International Space Station Tree House. 

In all the excitement, Violet misplaced 

her helmet in the tree and cannot do 

her spacewalk. She could really use 

your help!

Can you help Violet travel from the 

base of the tree to her helmet and 

down the slide wire to the finish?

Using your favorite crayon or pencil, 

carefully draw a path that will guide 

Violet through the maze and reunite her 

with her lost helmet.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

www.nasa.gov SP-2015-09-370-KSC

So, how did you do?

Were you able to help Violet locate her helmet, navigate 

the tree branches and return safely back to the ground?

Did you ask for assistance or need to check your 

progress against the solution key to the left?

Even the most experienced astronaut depends on others 

to ensure a safe mission. NASA’s Commercial Crew 

Program is working with partners to do just that.

Beginning in 2017, America will see a crew return to the 

International Space Station on an American spacecraft.
Hydrogen and Hydrocarbon, Air –Independent Fuel Cells

A NEW PARTNERING OPPORTUNITY

Reference No: NNJ14ZBH025L

Potential Commercial Applications: sub-sea industry, commercial space, automotive

industry, Department of Defense (DoD), and others

Keywords: fuel cells, hydrocarbon fuel, hydrogen

Purpose:

JSC is seeking partners to further Hydrogen and Hydrocarbon, Air –Independent Fuel 

Cells technology. NASA JSC has a long history in the development of fuel cell systems 

using pure oxygen as the oxidant and pure hydrogen as the fuel. Such a system was the 

primary power source for the Space Shuttle Orbiter. Along with spacecraft applications, 

these solutions could enhance mission capability in remotely operated subsea vehicles 

independent of surface power sources. 

Technology:

For future spacecraft power, NASA will require air-independent fuel cells and plans to 

push this technology in three directions: (1) higher reliability, (2) higher-temperature 

heat rejection, and (3) efficient use of fuel from reformed hydrocarbons. Potential 

solutions for the first requirement include “dead-headed” fuel cells of any chemistry, 

which have no active components for reactant management in the balance-of-plant. 

Potential solutions for the other two requirements center on solid oxide fuel cell 

chemistries. These chemistries can operate above 800 o

C, which can minimize the mass 

of heat rejection radiators, and can utilize both carbon monoxide and hydrogen as fuel, 

thus minimizing the stages required to reform hydrocarbon fuel sources.

R&D Status:

JSC has been working in collaboration with the US Navy to conduct testing programs and 

understand the system integration issues associated with potential solutions. 

Intellectual Property (IP):

This Partner relationship may produce new IP that could be jointly owned by NASA and 

the partner or may become the property of the partner.
#### John E. Woodward *v.*McDonald & Rogers.

Pleading —Answer — Information Sufficient to Form Belief.

Where the personal acts of the defendant are alleged and relied upon as the facts which constitute the cause of action against him, he will not be allowed to set up a want of knowledge or information to form a belief as to their existence as a defense to the action.

APPEAL FROM m’CRACKEW CIRCUIT COURT.

January 10, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters :

Where the personal acts of the defendant are alleged and relied upon as the facts which constitute the cause of action against him, he will not be allowed to set up a want of knowledge or information to form a belief as to their existence as a defense to the action. Nor do the matters alleged by way of avoidance in the answer present any defense.

Rut appellant states that he had no knowledge or recollection that appellees had any tobacco in Padueah, nor that he had taken .any of their tobacco under his control, and management, and he .also states that his books and memorandum which he kept in relation to the cotton and tobacco over which he took control were removed from the State by Gen. Payne, and he, therefore, could have mo access to them, thus putting in issue by a sufficient denial the facts that appellees had any tobacco in Paducah upon which he could have collected or did collect the illegal charges alleged to have been collected by him. These material facts having been "traversed by the answer, the demurrer to it was improperly sus*72tained. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

*Yeiser &*Bloomfield, *for appellees.*
that because the district court sanctioned it by ordering it to pay 

respondents' attorney fees and costs and a final judgment need not include 

a post-judgment award of fees and costs, the failure to include the amount 

of fees and costs awarded does not defeat finality here. We disagree. 

Respondents' sole claim in the petition for judicial review was 

for sanctions against appellant for its failure to mediate in good faith and 

comply with the statutory requirements for mediation. The district court's 

order sanctions appellant by ordering it to pay respondents' attorney fees 

and costs and directs respondents to file an affidavit of attorney fees and 

memorandum of costs within 10 days. Under these circumstances, the 

award of attorney fees and costs is part of the substance of the district 

court's order rather than a post-judgment award. While respondents have 

filed an affidavit of attorney fees and a memorandum of costs, the district 

court has not yet entered an order determining the amount of attorney 

fees and costs. Thus, the amount of the sanction has not yet been 

determined with finality and we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 

NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 44044) 

2 
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Thomas J. Tanksley, Settlement Judge 

Ballard Spahr, LLP 

Del Grosso Law, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A me 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_______________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR WILLARD ESTRADA, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-6155

(D.C. No. 5:99-CR-00177-M-2)

(W.D. Okla.)

_______________________________

ORDER

_______________________________

The matter of appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal is before the court. The motion 

is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 6, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 10-6155 Document: 01018472783 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Page: 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1908

To allow certain Mexican nationals to be admitted as nonimmigrant visitors 

for a period of 6 months. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To allow certain Mexican nationals to be admitted as 

nonimmigrant visitors for a period of 6 months.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMISSION FOR CERTAIN NON4 IMMIGRANT VISITORS. 

5 A Mexican national described in section 

6 212.1(c)(1)(i) of title 8 of the Code of Federal Regula7 tions, as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, 

8 shall be admitted as a nonimmigrant visitor for a period 

9 of 6 months.

Æ
II 

Calendar No. 546 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2017 

To designate the United States courthouse and post office building located 

at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́

United States Courthouse and Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2004 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse and post office 

building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse 

and Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2017 RS 

1 SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE ́ UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 

2 AND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

4 and post office building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

5 Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

10 States to the courthouse and post office building referred 

11 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

12 the Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Of13 fice Building. 

Calendar No. 546 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2017 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse and post 

Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferreoffice building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

 ́

ing’’. United States Courthouse and Post Office BuildJUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE WILSON, a/k/a Fat George,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-95-198, CA-98-2-6)

Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, Nos.

CR-95-198; CA-98-2-6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED