alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance
Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Fred W. Wagenhals, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Fred W. Wagenhals
**Exhibit31(a)**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, J.M. Haggar,III, Chief Executive Officer of Haggar Corp., certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Haggar Corp.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 12,  2004 |
|---------------------|
|                |
|                | /s/ J.M. Haggar,  III |   |
|                | J.M. Haggar, III |
|                |   |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
DATE: June 7, 2022

 

 

 The following case in which the Court of Appeals issued a published opinion has been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Alonzo Devon White

v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0994-20-4

Opinion rendered by Judge Russell

 on October 21, 2021

 Refused (211059)
 On May 19, 2022 the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the following case, which had 

been appealed from this Court

1. Chesapeake Hospital Authority, etc.

 v. State Health Commissioner, et al.

 Record No. 0116-20-1

 Memorandum opinion rendered by Judge Athey on October 27, 2020

 Judgment of Court of Appeals reversed and matter remanded to this Court

 for remand to the Commissioner for reconsideration

 (201510)
#### L. Ducker et al *v.*Jas. J. Bonar et al.

.Infants — Guardian Ad Litem — Judgment.

The fifty-fifth section of the Civil Code provides that “No judgment can be rendered against an infant until defense by guardian.” There was no guardian *ad litem*appointed to defend for the infants, and no defense was made for them. *Held,*that a decree against the infants was void.

Commissioner's Report. ,

An order confirming a master commissioner’s report appearing to have been made at the time of the filing of same, without allowing a guardian to file exceptions to it, is erroneous.

APPEAL PROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 30, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The fifty-fifth section of the Civil Code provides that the defense -of an infant must be by his regular guardian or by a guardian appointed to defend for him, and declares that “ no judgment can "be rendered against an infant until after a defense by a guardian.” ' The appellants, Cass, Henry, and William Ducker, are disclosed in the caption of the petition as *“*infant children of Richard Ducker, ■ deceased, all three of them under ten years of age.”

No guardian was appointed to defend for them nor was there r-any defense made for them. For this reason, the judgment is -erroneous and must be reversed.

The order confirming the master commissioner’s report appears 4» have been made at the time of the filing of the report without allowing him to file exceptions to it, and in this the order is erroneous and *reversed.*

The purchaser of the land not being a party to this appeal it is not deemed necessary now to decide whether or not the orders con- ■ firming the sale and directing and confirming the conveyance may not also be reversed by this court.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for :further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27497]



[[Page 67086]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 10-111-LNG]


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC; Opinion and Order Denying Request 
for Review Under Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy 
(DOE) gives notice that on October 21, 2010, it issued an opinion and 
order pursuant to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), that Sabine 
Pass Liquefaction, LLC's (Sabine Pass) pending application of September 
7, 2010, in DOE/FE Docket No. 10-111 LNG for authorization to export 
liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non free trade agreement countries will 
be reviewed under section 3(a) of the NGA, and Sabine Pass' request for 
review under section 3(c) of the NGA is denied.
    This Order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Oil and Gas Global Security and Supply docket room, 3E-042, Forrestal 
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Order is also available 
electronically at the following DOE/FE Web address: http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/gasregulation/index.html.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2010.
John A. Anderson,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulatory Activities, Office of Oil and Gas 
Global Security and Supply, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010-27497 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that such  provisions  requrie the filing of an opinion of registiered
          public  accountants to accompany the  Partnership's  annual  financial
          statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 18, 2005
# Delegation of Waiver Authority Pursuant to Section 107(a) of Public Law 110-457

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the  United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby  delegate to you the functions conferred upon the President by section 107(a) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-457). 

                    You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                 

[FR Doc. 2010-27677

Billing code 4710-10-P
NASA’s vision and mission necessitate that its workforce is ready and able to lead the world in space exploration, scientific discovery, technology development, and managerial excellence.  NASA leadership has identified systems engineering as a critical core competency in enabling current and future mission success. While many NASA centers have hands-on systems engineering development programs that provide targeted development and systems engineering training locally, NASA identified the need for an advanced, agency-wide program that competitively selects high-potential system engineers. As a result, the agency established the Systems and Engineering Leadership Program (SELP).

NASA’s Office of the Chief Engineer (OCE) has robust program/project management and engineering training programs within the Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership Knowledge Services (APPEL Knowledge Services). With over 60 in-depth courses and its commitment to engineering excellence APPEL Knowledge Services provides the alignment needed for employees to gain the technical training needed to successfully compete for SELP.

SELP provides systems engineers with an agency-wide perspective, hands-on systems engineering developmental assignments beyond what they can learn and experience at their home centers, advanced leadership skills development, and exposure to innovative government and industry-wide systems engineering concepts.

Since its inception, SELP has achieved a consistent 90 percent success rate of individuals transitioning into more complex and difficult positions upon returning to their organizations after completion of the program.

**For more information, please visit the SELP website: https://appel.nasa.gov/developmental-programs/seldp-overview/seldp-program-overview/**
#### Davis *v.*The State.—In error.

*Monday, November*23

A *SCIRE*FACIAS-on a recognizance taken by a justice of the peace, for the appearance of a person in the Circuit Court to answer 'a criminal charge, must show that -the recognizance was filed and made a matter of .record in the Circuit Court. *Andress*v. *The State,*3 Blackf. *108.*—Lang v. *The State, Id.*344.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1663 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

  2d Session

                                S. 1663

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 14, 2004.

    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1663) entitled ``An Act to 
replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The 2 maps subtitled ``NC-07P'', relating to the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal Barrier 
Resources System Cape Fear Unit NC-07P, that are included in the set of 
maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources System'' and referred to in 
section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), 
are hereby replaced by 2 other maps relating to those units entitled 
``Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear Unit, NC-07P'' and dated 
May 5, 2004.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document

 

PRIMO WATER CORPORATIONAMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE SEVERANCE AND NON-COMPETITION PLAN
RECITALS
A.Primo Water Corporation (the “Company”) established the Cott Corporation Severance and Non-Competition Plan effective February 18, 2009, as amended by the amendment to the Cott Corporation Severance and Non-Competition Plan dated effective August 1, 2018 (collectively, the “Plan”).
B.Pursuant to articles of amalgamation filed March 2, 2020, the Company has changed its name from “Cott Corporation” to “Primo Water Corporation”. 
C.Pursuant to Section 8.4 of the Plan, the board of directors of the Company wish to amend the Plan to reflect this name change effective March 2, 2020 as hereinafter set forth.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby adopted on this 13th day of March 2020, to reflect the following amendment effective as of March 2, 2020:
1.Amendment to Plan
Each instance of the Plan where “Cott Corporation” is referred to, including the title of the Plan, shall be replaced with “Primo Water Corporation”. For greater certainty, the Plan shall hereafter be referred to as the “Primo Water Corporation Severance and Non-Competition Plan”.
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan shall remain the same, and the Plan, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect. 
7043294
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1720 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1720

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
        To provide for Federal court proceedings in Plano, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHANGE IN COMPOSITION OF DIVISIONS OF EASTERN DISTRICT OF 
TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--Section 124(c) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) in paragraph (3)--
            (A) by striking ``Denton, and Grayson'' and inserting 
        ``Delta, Denton, Fannin, Grayson, Hopkins, and Lamar''; and
            (B) by inserting ``and Plano'' after ``held at Sherman'';
        (2) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraphs (5) 
    through (7) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and
        (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by inserting ``Red 
    River,'' after ``Franklin,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
        (1) In general.--This section and the amendments made by this 
    section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
        (2) Pending cases not affected.--This section and the 
    amendments made by this section shall not affect any action 
    commenced before the effective date of this section and pending in 
    the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 
    on such date.
        (3) Juries not affected.--This section and the amendments made 
    by this section shall not affect the composition, or preclude the 
    service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, impaneled, or 
    actually serving in the Eastern Judicial District of Texas on the 
    effective date of this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY-957400-11-L14200000-BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey, Wyoming.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has filed the plats of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming, on the dates indicated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were executed at the request 
of the Bureau of Land Management, and are necessary for the management 
of resources. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the subdivision of section 10, 
Township 13 North, Range 77 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, 
Group No. 801, was accepted September 29, 2010.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the Twelfth Auxiliary Meridian West, through Township 52 
North, between Ranges 100 and 101 West, a portion of Lot No. 43 and the 
metes and bounds survey of Lot 43-C, Township 52 North, Range 100 West, 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 802, was accepted 
September 29, 2010.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the Thirteenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 100 
West, Lot No. 41 and the subdivision of Lot No. 41, Township 53 North, 
Range 100 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 802, was 
accepted September 29, 2010.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the subdivision of sections 9 
and 10, Township 47 North, Range 60 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, 
Wyoming, Group No. 803, was accepted September 29, 2010.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the 
subdivisional lines, Township 22 North, Range 93 West, Sixth Principal 
Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 807, was accepted September 29, 2010.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the 
south boundary, west boundary and the subdivisional lines, Township 28 
North, Range 109 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 
808, was accepted September 29, 2010.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-27342 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
# STS-37 MS Godwin balances MS Ross using her index finger on OV-104’s middeck

STS037-29-002 (5-11 April 1991) --- Astronauts Linda M. Godwin and Jerry L. Ross perform a balancing act on Atlantis' middeck. With little effort Godwin is able to hold Ross up near the ceiling with her index finger. Although the area the two occupy is very small, a number of articles are seen, including two sleep restraints, the escape pole and Bioserve ITA Materials Dispersion Apparatus bioprocessing test bed (attached to stowage lockers at left). This was one of the visuals used by the STS-37 crewmembers during their April 19 post-flight press conference at the Johnson Space Center (JSC).

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s37-29-002/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 11, 1991ProducerJSCSize1920x1273pxPIA Numbers37-29-002The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

OSCAR JAMES MITCHELL, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10058 

D.C. No. 3:05-cr-00233-LRH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Oscar James Mitchell appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

the 14-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mitchell’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no 

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10058 

provided Mitchell the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se 

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.