alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DON EVAN CIOETA,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-562

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 18, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County,

Jeffrey Mahl, Judge.

Don E. Cioeta, Lake City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Don Cioeta, seeks review of the order summarily denying his motion for 

postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm 

as to all claims except claims two and seven. In claim two, Cioeta contends that his trial 

counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress Cioeta’s statements to the 

police. In claim seven, Cioeta argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to 
2

impeach a witness with prior inconsistent statements. Because these two claims are not 

refuted by the record, it was error for the trial court to summarily deny them. Therefore, 

we reverse that part of the order under review denying these two claims and remand for 

an evidentiary hearing or attachment of portions of the record that conclusively refute the 

claims. 

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. 

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_______________________________

ANTHONY KENNEY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROSE ROCK APTS, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 10-5027

(D.C. No. 4:10-CV-00088-CVE-TLW)

(N.D. Okla.)

_______________________________

ORDER

_______________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 10-5027 Document: 01018436526 Date Filed: 06/08/2010 Page: 1
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Robert Selvi, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SonicWALL, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 15, 2006 /s/ Robert Selvi     **Robert Selvi**  **Chief Financial Officer**
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALAN ABRAHAMS.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
GEORGE D. (NICKNAME PINKY) NELSON (PH.D.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born July 13, 1950, in Charles City, Iowa. Considers Willmar, 

Minnesota, to be his hometown. His wife Susie is from Alhambra, California. They 

have two daughters. Pinky enjoys playing golf, reading, swimming, running, and 

music.

EDUCATION: Graduated from Willmar Senior High School, Willmar, Minnesota, in 

1968; received a bachelor of science degree in Physics from Harvey Mudd College in 

1972 and a master of science and a doctorate in Astronomy from the University of 

Washington in 1974 and 1978, respectively.

SPECIAL HONORS: NASA Exceptional Engineering Achievement Medal, NASA 

Exceptional Service Medal, 3 NASA Space Flight Medals, AIAA Haley Space Flight 

Award, Federation Aeronautique Internationale's V. M. Komarov Diploma.

EXPERIENCE: Dr. Nelson performed astronomical research at the Sacramento Peak Solar Observatory, Sunspot, New 

Mexico; the Astronomical Institute at Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, and the University of Gottingen Observatory, 

Gottingen, West Germany, and at the Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics in Boulder, Colorado.

NASA EXPERIENCE: Dr. Nelson was selected as an astronaut candidate by NASA in January 1978. He flew as a 

scientific equipment operator in the WB 57-F earth resources aircraft; served as the Astronaut Office representative in the 

Space Shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (space suit) development effort. During STS-1 he was the photographer in the 

prime chase plane. He also served as support crewman and CAPCOM for the last two OFT flights, STS-3 and STS-4, and as 

head of the Astronaut Office Mission Development Group. A verteran of three space flights, Dr. Nelson served aboard STS41C in 1984, STS-61C in 1986 and STS-26 in 1988. He has logged a total of 411 hours in space, including 10 hours of EVA 

flight time. 

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE: STS-41C Challenger (April 6-13, 1984) was a seven day mission during which the crew 

successfully deployed the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF); retrieved the ailing Solar Maximum Satellite, repaired it 

on-board the Orbiter, and replaced it in orbit. The mission also included flight testing of Manned Maneuvering Units 

(MMUs) in two extravehicular activities (EVAs), and operation of the Cinema 360 and IMAX Camera Systems.

STS-61C Columbia (January 12-18, 1986) launched from the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and returned to a night landing 

at Edwards Air Force Base, California. During the six day flight the crew deployed the SATCOM KU satellite, and 

conducted experiments in astrophysics and materials processing.

STS-26 Discovery (September 29 to October 3, 1988) was the first mission flown after the Challenger accident. During the 

four day flight, the crew successfully deployed the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS-C), and operated eleven middeck science experiments. 

APRIL 1989

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7223]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as also known as Jundallah, and also known as People's Resistance Movement of Iran (PMRI), also known as Jonbesh-i Moqavemat-i-Mardom-i-Iran, also known as Popular Resistance Movement of Iran, also known as Soldiers of God, also known as Fedayeen-e-Islam, also known as Former Jundallah of Iran, also known as Jundullah, also known as Jondullah, also known as Jundollah, also known as Jondollah, also known as Jondallah, also known as Army of God (God's Army) and also known as the Baloch Peoples Resistance Movement (BPRM) committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: October 21, 2010. 

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-27787 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=7423
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129930 & (45) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ERIN LEECH, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129930 COA: 253827 Kent CC: 03-006701-NI ANITA KRAMER, Defendant,

and

KENT COUNTY BO ARD OF ROAD COMMISSIONERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of April 5, 2006, the applicati on for leave to appeal the October 11, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pend ing the decision in Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm (Docket No. 130379). The case was decided on May 2, 2007, 477 Mich 197 (2007). On May 29, 2007, the defendant Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Kent filed a motion for peremptory reversal. On order of the Court, the application and the motion for peremptory re versal are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal, we GRANT the motion for peremptory reversal and REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The plaintiff’s notice to the defendant Bo ard was untimely unde r MCL 691.1404. Rowland,

supra . We REMAND this case to the Kent Circ uit Court for entry of an order granting summary disposition to the defendant Board.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

p0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1675

To provide for the reimbursement of air fare costs incurred by members 

of the United States Armed Forces for domestic travel while on leave 

from deployment overseas in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

Operation Enduring Freedom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2003

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To provide for the reimbursement of air fare costs incurred 

by members of the United States Armed Forces for 

domestic travel while on leave from deployment overseas 

in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation 

Enduring Freedom.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1675 IS 

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF DOMESTIC AIR FARE 

2 COSTS INCURRED BY MEMBERS OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES WHILE ON LEAVE FROM DE4 PLOYMENT OVERSEAS IN SUPPORT OF OPER5 ATION IRAQI FREEDOM AND OPERATION EN6 DURING FREEDOM. 

7 The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse air fare 

8 costs incurred by members of the United States Armed 

9 Forces in connection with travel within the United States 

10 while such members are on leave from deployment over11 seas in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation 

12 Enduring Freedom.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 164 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 164

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
   resource study of sites associated with the life of Cesar Estrada 
                  Chavez and the farm labor movement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cesar Estrada Chavez Study Act''.

SEC. 2. RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 3 years after funds are made 
available to implement this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
(referred to in this section as the ``Secretary'') shall complete a 
resource study of sites in the State of Arizona, the State of 
California, and other States that are significant to the life of Cesar 
E. Chavez and the farm labor movement in the western United States to 
determine appropriate methods for preserving and interpreting the 
sites; and to determine whether any of the sites meets the criteria for 
listing in the National Register of Historic Places or designation as a 
national historic landmark under the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 
461 et seq.); and the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
et seq.).
    (b) Requirements.--In conducting the study the Secretary shall 
consider the criteria for the study of areas of potential inclusion in 
the National Park System under section 8(b)(2) of Public Law 91-383 (16 
U.S.C. 1a-5(b)(2)).
    (c) Consultation.--In conducting the study the Secretary shall 
consult with--
            (1) the Cesar E. Chavez Foundation;
            (2) the United Farm Workers Union; and
            (3) State and local historical associations and societies, 
        including State Historic Preservation Offices in the State 
        where a site is located.
    (d) Report.--On completion of the study the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report on the 
findings of the study and any recommendations.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the Senate April 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 164

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
   resource study of sites associated with the life of Cesar Estrada 
                  Chavez and the farm labor movement.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 448 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 448

  Recognizing the accomplishments and the contributions of Vietnamese 
                               Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2017

  Mr. Correa (for himself, Mr. Lowenthal, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Ms. 
   Lofgren, Mrs. Comstock, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the accomplishments and the contributions of Vietnamese 
                               Americans.

Whereas, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War, approximately 800,000 Vietnamese 
        refugees fleeing persecution resettled in the United States;
Whereas an estimated 1.7 million Vietnamese Americans currently reside in the 
        United States, making the United States home to the largest number of 
        individuals of Vietnamese descent outside of Vietnam and Vietnamese 
        Americans the fourth largest Asian American population in the United 
        States;
Whereas Vietnamese Americans have established strong communities across the 
        country, including in the States of California, Florida, Georgia, 
        Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, 
        Virginia, and Washington;
Whereas first- and second-generation Vietnamese Americans have overcome 
        tremendous socio-economic challenges, including discrimination, language 
        and cultural barriers, and poverty, to emerge as significant 
        contributors to American society;
Whereas Vietnamese Americans contribute to American society through their work 
        in business, education, science and technology, engineering, 
        mathematics, literature and the arts, gastronomy, the armed forces, and 
        public service at every level of government;
Whereas Vietnamese Americans support the advancement of religious freedom, 
        democracy, and human rights around the world; and
Whereas Vietnamese Americans contribute to the rich cultural and religious 
        diversity of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives to 
recognize the accomplishments and significant contributions of 
Vietnamese Americans in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Seaton *v.*Crump et al.

Notes — Prima Facie Evidence of Indebtedness.

Where the authority of one partner to bind the partnership firm is proven by the evidence a note signed by that partner for the firm’s indebtedness is *prima facie*evidence that the firm owed the whole amount of same.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 19, 1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson :

The deposition of Archibald, corroborated by other facts and testimony, shows that on the 4th of January, 1858, the partnership between Deatheridge and Crump had not been dissolved; and there is no proof of the time of dissolution. Had the dissolution *188occurred before the date of the note for $2,012, Crump could easily have proved this fact, and Ms failure to prove it is strongly negative. Tlie fact that he engaged in the service of another house does not prove that his partnership with Deatheridge had been then dissolved, because he had never been an active partner so as to preclude him from doing other business during the subsistence of his partnership with Deatheridge. It seems to us, therefore, that the probabilities preponderate decidedly against the assumption that Deatheridge and Crump were not partners when their note to Seaton and Deatheridge was executed by the latter, whose authority to bind Crump by the execution of it is, therefore, clear.

The record proves that at the date of the note for $2,012, the books of Deatheridge and Crump showed that they were indebted to Seaton and Deatheridge, $1,512, and the execution of the note for $2,012 implied that, in some way, they owed them $500 more. The note itself is, therefore, *prima facie*evidence that Deatheridge and Crump, at - its date, owed Seaton & Deatheridge the whole amount of it.

The allegations of the petition and the sustaining proof show that Deatheridge owes Seaton probably as much as the amount of it, and certainly a portion of it. Deatheridge’s insolvency and nonresidence, therefore, entitled Seaton to maintain this suit against Crump and Deatheridge for his own benefit. The precise amount which he ought to recover is not satisfactorily proved. But, as the record now stands, his title to more than the amount of Deatheridge’s note to him in January, 1858, for $412, is indisputable.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the absolute dismission of Seaton’s petition was erroneous. But the uncertainty as to the precise amount of Deatheridge’s indebtedness to Seaton and as to Crump’s right to set off the amount of Deatheridge’s indebtedness to him incline the court to leave these matters unadjudged for further and more complete preparation and ulterior consideration in the court below.

Wherefore, the dismissal of Seaton’s petition is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.