alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31





CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jehu Hand, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Maritime Partners, Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 13, 2006



/s/ Jehu Hand

Jehu Hand

President (chief executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer
# STS-48 crew leaves KSC O&C Bldg for launch pad during preflight activities

STS048-S-168 (18 Sept. 1991) --- The five astronaut crew members for NASA's STS-48 mission leave the operations and checkout building headed for a transfer van that will take them to the awaiting Discovery at Launch Complex 39.  Astronaut John O. Creighton, right, mission commander, leads the group, with Kenneth S. Reightler, pilot, on his right.  Mission specialists are, left to right, James F. Buchli, Mark N. Brown and Charles D. (Sam) Gemar.  In the background are astronauts Steven R. Nagel and Richard O. Covey and Olan J. Bertrand, all from the Johnson Space Center (JSC).  Discovery launched at 7:11:04 p.m. (EDT), Sept. 12, 1991. Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts048-s-168/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 12, 1991ProducerJSCSize1920x1317pxPIA Numbersts048-s-168The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### M’Nutt *v.*Arnott.—In error.

*Wednesday, May*22.

TRESPASS for breaking the plaintiff’s close and cutting his timber thereon. Pleas, 1. Not guilty; 2. That a state road was established running through said close, and that the defendant, as a commissioner of the road, entered on the close and cut down and removed th.e trees growing in the road, &c. New assignment, that the 'suit was not only for the trespasses mentioned in the plea, but also for other trespasses out of the road. Plea to the new assignment, not guilty.

*Held,*that the plaintiff by new assigning, without denying the special plea, admitted the existence and validity of the state road, and the defendant’s authority as set forth in the plea, and confined the issue to such trespasses as were alleged in the new assignment. 1 Chitt. Pl. 665.—1 Saund. 300, a, b, c, note.—2 Camp. *175*.—White v. *Conover,*post, 462.
#### Farmer and Wife *v.*Milan et al.

Payment — When to be Credited on Note No Date Being Stated — Pleading Consideration — Misprision.

By failing to state the date of the payment of $250 on the mortgage debt, if nothing appeared in the record from which the time could be fixed, the credit should have been entered as of the date of the maturity of the debt.

The petition need not set out the consideration for the assignment of a note.

If the case was heard before it stood for trial, that according to section 578, Civil Code, is a clerical misprision, which cannot be corrected on appeal, but by motion when judgment was rendered.

February 17, 1864.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

The original petition, although not in very concise language, contains a statement of facts which are deemed sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and by failing to state the date of the payment of the $250 on the mortgage debt, if nothing appeared in the record from which the time could be fixed, the credit should have been entered as of the date of the maturity of the debt.

'It is not deemed necessary to enable Milan to sustain the action, that he should have set out the consideration for the assignment of the notes to him, nor was it material to appellants, except that so much of the payments which he might make on the notes, as was required to pay the mortgage debt, should be applied to its discharge, and thereby relieve the land from .that incumbrance.

If the case was heard before it stood for trial, that, according to section 518, Civil Code, is a clerical misprision, and this court cannot correct the error, but the remedy would have been by motion in the court when the judgment was rendered, upon reasonable notice being given to the adverse party or his attorney in the action. § 5801, Civil Code.

According to our calculation, which is believed to be correct, the payment on the note due the 15th of,January, 1&61, as set out in the petition, exceeds the amount due thereon, including the *345interest, $43.62. But the answer denies that the $250, admitted in the original petition to have been paid on the mortgage debt, constituted any part of the payments on the notes set out in the amended petition, and in a subsequent part of the answer it is said in substance that the balance due on the mortgage debt is less by $300 than the data furnished by the plaintiff would show it to be, which must be understood as only controverting $300 of the balance claimed by the plaintiff below, and in that $300 may be included the $250 which it is denied constituted any part of the payments made on the notes, and also the $43.62, the overpayment of the note due 15th of January, 1861, for which, on the final hearing, a credit can be given.

*As*no judgment was rendered for the $300 controverted by the answer, we perceive no error for which to reverse the judgment, and it is, therefore, affirmed. •
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of HFB Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stanley Alexander, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      August 11, 2003                       /s/ Stanley Alexander, Jr.
                                            --------------------------
                                            Stanley Alexander, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,115,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,934,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,745,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,098,545
<PP&E>                                      88,886,957
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,203,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,225,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,502,451
<BONDS>                                      7,087,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,088,355
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,058
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,786,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,225,144
<SALES>                                     26,205,670<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,205,670<F1>
<CGS>                                       18,321,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,830,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,291,444)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             441,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                   111,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            113,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   113,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<FN>
<F1>Sales and Total Revenues are net of federal and state excise taxes.
<F2>Other-expenses includes $1.0 million gain on the sale of surplus real estate in July 2000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE LLOYD PETER LIND and 

JOYCE MALIN LIND, 

 Debtors. 

__________________________________ 

LLOYD PETER LIND and JOYCE 

MALIN LIND, 

 Appellants, 

 v. 

LYLE R. NELSON, Trustee, 

 Appellee. 

BAP No. WO-10-013 

Bankr. No. 09-14676 

Chapter 7 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

May 19, 2010 

————————————————— 

The matter before the Court is the Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by 

Appellants Lloyd Peter Lind and Joyce Malin Lind and Appellee Lyle R. Nelson, Trustee 

(the “Motion”). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(1) The Motion is GRANTED. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2); 10th Cir. 

BAP L.R. 8016-4(a)(8). 

(2) Any deadlines previously set by the Court are VACATED. 

(3) This appeal is DISMISSED. 

BAP Appeal No. 10-13 Docket No. 18-1 Filed: 05/19/2010 Page: 1 of 2
(4) The mandate shall issue immediately. A certified copy of this Order 

shall constitute the mandate on appeal. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-13 Docket No. 18-1 Filed: 05/19/2010 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1791 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1791

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2004

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 to provide that the 
amounts received by the United States under that Act shall be deposited 
            in the reclamation fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASE LOT CONVEYANCE.

    Section 4(b) of the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 (116 Stat. 
2879) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``As consideration'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(1) In general.--As consideration''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Use.--Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be--
                    ``(A) deposited by the Secretary, on behalf of the 
                Rio Grande Project, in the reclamation fund established 
                under the first section of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 
                U.S.C. 391); and
                    ``(B) made immediately available to the Irrigation 
                Districts, to be credited in accordance with section 
                4(I) of the Act of December 5, 1924 (43 U.S.C. 501).''.

            Passed the Senate September 15, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                            Secretary.
```
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DONALD ALTON HARPER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

P. URBANO, P.A.; NORMAN S.

ROSENTHAL, M.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1173

(D.C. No. 1:07-CV-00750-REB-KMT)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1173 Document: 01018444354 Date Filed: 06/21/2010 Page: 1
lksd-ex1014_502.htm



Exhibit 10.14 

March 31, 2020

Mr. Thomas J. Quinlan III

At the address on file with the Company

Dear Tom:

This letter documents our recent discussions regarding your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with LSC Communications, Inc. (together with its affiliates, the “Company”).  As we have agreed, going forward, your severance benefits will be provided under the Company’s Separation Pay Plan.  By signing this letter, you agree and acknowledge that, beginning on the date of this letter, you waive, release, forfeit and relinquish any and all right, claim, title and interest in and to the severance entitlements arising under Article II of your Employment Agreement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, your rights of indemnification under the Company’s and any of its subsidiaries’ organizational documents, any plan or agreement at law or otherwise and your rights thereunder to director’s and officer’s liability insurance coverage shall survive any termination of your employment.

Except as expressly provided above, your Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect.  The laws of the State of Illinois, without giving effect to its conflict of laws principles, govern all matters arising out of or relating to this letter, including its interpretation, construction, performance and enforcement.  

 [Signature Page Follows]



If this letter correctly describes our understanding, please execute and deliver a counterpart of this signature page, which will become a binding agreement on our receipt.

 


			
	
Very truly yours,

	
 

	
LSC Communications, Inc.

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Suzanne S. Bettman

	
 
	
Name:
	
Suzanne S. Bettman

	
 
	
Title:
	
General Counsel




 

 

I agree with and accept the terms of this letter:

 

 

 

_/s/ Thomas J. Quinlan III__________

Name: Thomas J. Quinlan III

Date: April 1, 2020

[Signature Page to Waiver Letter]
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk , Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: November 10, 2010
Tracking Number: 2010-01-02 (SC-02) 


Technology Space Flight Test Program 


NASA Advisory Council Recommendation: 

The Science Committee urges that NASA institute a technology space flight test 

program to close the "mid-technology readiness level (TRL) gap" between Earthbased tests and flight readiness. This program would take testing of new flight 

technologies and instruments to the next level, bridging a critical gap to keeping the 

technology pipeline open and sustaining a robust technology development 

community. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

There is a persistent gap between testing ofnew flight subsystem and instrument 

technologies on Earth and their eventual acceptance for use in space flight. This is 

commonly termed the "mid-TRL" level gap. Technical reviewers of proposals for flight 

projects, and flight project managers, are very reluctant to approve new technologies for 

flight that have no previous flight heritage. To eliminate this conundrum, a flight 

program is required whose sole purpose is to take the necessary risks to fly new 

technologies and certify them for science and exploration flights. NASA's past "New 

Millennium" technology flight program used to provide this service and should be 

revived. 

NASA Response: 

NASA agrees with this recommendation and plans the foHowing actions: 

1. 	 As the NASA Chief Technologist reported at the April 2010 meeting ofthe NAC 

Science Committee, NASA has included in the President's FY 2011 budget 

request a crosscutting technology demonstrations program. 

2. 	 The President's FY 2011 budget request is currently under review by the 

U.S. Congress. NASA will monitor the progress ofthe President's budget request 

and will report back to the NAC as events warrant. 

Enclosure 2
# Schrodinger Basin

Mosaic of Clementine images of the Schrodinger Basin (312 km diameter). In addition to the prominent, dark, cone-shaped feature (white arrow), Schrodinger has an inner ring of mountains partially encircling the basin floor (a ‘peak ring complex’) and a network of radial and concentric fractures. The projection is polar stereographic, centered on the basin at - 75 ° S, 132 ° E.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/schrodinger-basin/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASA/JPL/USGSSize1024x1046pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

 

I, David M. Tehle, ChiefFinancial Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,2003, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                           | /s/ David M.  Tehle |                                     |
|--------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  February 12, 2004 |                | David M.  Tehle, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                |                     |                                          |  |

 

1

----
****

## Gordon Roxburgh

----

I was born in 1974 long after the moon landings had been completed; my first recollections of space exploration were in 1981 when I sat transfixed to the TV watching Columbia lifting off on the first ever mission of the Space Shuttle. Ever since that day in 1981 the whole aerospace subject has fascinated me. The *Apollo Lunar Surface Journal* allowed myself and others to experience man's first journey to another solar body, even though were we never around when it actually happened.

My main contributions to Eric's fabulous project have been the design, of a simple, but effective, user interface and graphics package to identify and brand the journal while letting it grow and expand within a set and easy to understand structure. I also contributed to digitising of the 'moon to ground' audio into real audio format, helping to make the journal an even more realistic experience.

2 September 2002