alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Schoolfield’s Admr. et al. *v.*Patrick H. Clayton.

Executors and Administrators — 'Delinquent Taxes — Failure to Collect by Deputy — Evidence.

An original petition charged a collection of taxes by the deputy sheriff of about $700 unaccounted for, which was traversed by defendants. An amended petition made a vague alternative charge of failure to collect the balance of taxes without alleging that it was collectible or even a failure to return a delinquent tax list. The answer avers a certain portion was not collectible in consequence of insolvency. And to sustain that affirmative defendants offered to prove that when the tax-books were received by the deputy certain taxpayers were insolvent and still continued so. *Held,*that this proof would repeal any legal liability of negligent failure to collect, and would entitle defendants to exoneration *pro tanto mid*it was error to exclude the proffered testimony.

June 1, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson :

As the record shows that the law and the facts .were submitted to the court, a jury was dispensed with. There was, therefore, no error, as supposed by counsel, in rendering the judgment without a jury. But there are at least two radical errors in the judgment as rendered. 1st. It is against Barber, personally, when it ought to have been against him as administrator of John School-field.

2d. As the original petition charged a collection by the deputy sheriff, J. J. Schoolfield, of all the taxes which he undertook to collect, and this was traversed by the appellants, there could have been no judgment against them on that issue, because it'appears that the whole balance of about $700 had never been collected. The amended petition made a vague alternative charge of failure to collect that balance without alleging that it was collectible, or even a failure to return a delinquent list. The answer to that charge avers that a certain portion was not collectible in consequence of insolvency. And, to sustain that affirmative allegation, the appellants offered to prove that, when the tax-books were received by the deputy, certain taxpayers were insolvent, and still continued so. This proof would repel any legal liability of negligent failure to collect. And would entitle the appellants to *421exoneration *pro tanto.*It seems to this court, therefore, that the Circuit Court erred to their prejudice in refusing to admit their proffered testimony of insolvency.

*Duvall,*for Appellants.

On these grounds, without noticing others, we are of the opinion that, the judgment is erroneous, and, therefore, it is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In Re: GLENN E. DUGGINS,

Petitioner.

No. 10-2074

(D.C. No. 2:99-CR-0077-JEC-2)

ORDER

Despite court directives on April 5, 2010, May 20, 2010, and June 9, 2010, the

petitioner has failed to show service on the trial court judge, as required by Fed. R. App.

P. 21(a)(1). Accordingly, the captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution

pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1. 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2074 Document: 01018444727 Date Filed: 06/21/2010 Page: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1669 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 365
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1669

                          [Report No. 108-186]

     To reauthorize the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2003

Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Breaux) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                            November 5, 2003

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL AID IN SPORT FISH RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT.

    Section 4 of the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 
U.S.C. 777c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) in the paragraph heading, by striking 
                        ``2003'' and inserting ``2004''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``2003'' and inserting 
                        ``2004''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (4);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph 
                (4); and
                    (D) in paragraphs (3)(C) and (4) (as redesignated 
                by subparagraph (C)), by striking ``Secretary of 
                Transportation'' each place it appears and inserting 
                ``Secretary of Homeland Security''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon at the end; and
                    (B) by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(5) ``$10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003 and 
        2004;''.

                                                       Calendar No. 365

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1669

                          [Report No. 108-186]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To reauthorize the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 5, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
Office of the Director for Programs [300]

Director

Deputy Director

Deputy ARD

Administrative Support

Mission Programs and Projects Personnel*

Directorate Support Office [300]

Matrixed Staff

Project Support Office (PSO)

ARMD ARD

Aeronautics Projects Branch [310]

Chief

Deputy Chief

Science Projects Branch [320]

Chief

Deputy Chief

Space Projects and Partnerships 

Branch [330]

Chief

Deputy Chief

* Mission Programs and Projects: FOP, LBFD, FDC, UAS-NAS
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George Ecker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OCTuS, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2010  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS Inc.





Date: May 24, 2010


/s/ George EckerGeorge Ecker

Chief Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOSIAH STONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

ADAIR COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT; ELOHIM, INC., 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-7092

(D.C. No. 6:09-CV-00306-RAW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 

10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-7092 Document: 01018349596 Date Filed: 01/15/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. George Klaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/  L. George Klaus


L. George Klaus


Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2002
May 24, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIMOTHY WAYNE DREW, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00069-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41211

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL GUTIERREZ-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-03-CR-338-1

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Gutierrez-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Gutierrez-Salazar contends that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are

unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must

be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8

U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-41211

-2-

conviction only under that provision, and his sentence must be

vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than

two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Gutierrez-Salazar acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1714

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 

amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 

in high-cost areas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 3, 2003

Mr. CORZINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Multifamily Loan 

5 Limit Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMIT FOR MULTI7 FAMILY HOUSING IN HIGH-COST AREAS. 

8 Sections 207(c)(3)(B), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 

9 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 
2

•S 1714 IS 

1 231(c)(2)(B), and 234(e)(3)(B) of the National Housing 

2 Act (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3)(B), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 

3 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

4 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B)), and 1715y(e)(3)(B)) 

5 are each amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘110 percent’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘170 percent’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘140 percent’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘170 percent’’. 

10 SEC. 3. CATCH-UP ADJUSTMENTS TO CERTAIN MAXIMUM 

11 MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMITS. 

12 (a) SECTION 207 LIMITS.—Section 207(c)(3)(A) of 

13 the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3)(A)) is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘$11,250’’ and inserting ‘‘$17,460’’. 

15 (b) SECTION 213 LIMITS.—Section 213(b)(2)(A) of 

16 the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715e(b)(2)(A)) is 

17 amended—

18 (1) by striking ‘‘$38,025’’ and inserting 

19 ‘‘$41,207’’; 

20 (2) by striking ‘‘$42,120’’ and inserting 

21 ‘‘$47,511’’; 

22 (3) by striking ‘‘$50,310’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘$57,300’’; 

24 (4) by striking ‘‘$62,010’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘$73,343’’; 
3

•S 1714 IS 

1 (5) by striking ‘‘$70,200’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$81,708’’; 

3 (6) by striking ‘‘$49,140’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$49,710’’; 

5 (7) by striking ‘‘$60,255’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘$60,446’’; 

7 (8) by striking ‘‘$75,465’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$78,197’’; and 

9 (9) by striking ‘‘$85,328’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘$85,836’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                              OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Robert W. Riland III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of DISC, Inc.

                                    By: /s/ ROBERT W. RILAND, III
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Robert W. Riland, III
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

         I, Henry Madrid, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of DISC, Inc.

                                    By: /s/ HENRY MADRID
                                        -----------------------------
                                    Name:  Henry Madrid
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY JUNIOR WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:08-cr-00295-BO-1; 5:13-cv-00014-BO)

Submitted: October 29, 2013 Decided: November 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Junior Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jane 

J. Jackson, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudy E. Renfer, Kristine L. 

Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Junior Williams appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) 

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 5:08-cr-00295-

BO-01; 5:13-cv-00014-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013). We deny 

Williams’ motion to expand the certificate of appealability. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
6 5

1 2

NAME:

NATIONALITY:

DATE OF ISSUANCE:

3 4

SECOND EDITION
How to fold your Passport

Fold paper on all lines 

then open.

Fold the book and close.

Open and fold lengthwise.

Push in on both ends.

Fold paper in half,

then cut along the 

dotted line.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GENISE JONES.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## December 30, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 12
- December 30, 2009

            - Winter High School Alumnus in Orbit on Space Station Will Talk with Wisconsin Students, State Representative
            - Clouds and Sunlight
            - Pioneers 6-13
            - Suzaku Finds ‘Fossil’ Fireballs from Supernovae
            - Cassini Top 10 Science Highlights – 2009
# Hansel D. V. Gill

Director Michoud Assembly Facility

Since being named to the position in April 2024, Director Hansel Gill has overseen one of the world’s largest manufacturing facilities, which provides the crucial infrastructure where elements of NASA’s Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft are assembled. Michoud also provides facilities for non-NASA governmental and commercial technology-based industry tenant operations.

Prior to this assignment, Gill served as Michoud deputy director. He also served as subsystem manager for production of the SLS Block 1B Exploration Upper Stage, from 2016 to 2021, in the Block 1B Development Office and the Stages Element Office, providing technical leadership for SLS core stage and exploration upper stage planning and production operations. From 2015-2016, Gill served as technical assistant to the Office of the Director, Marshall Space Flight Center.

In 2013, Gill served as team lead and acting assistant branch chief for the Metals Joining and Processes Branch of the Metals Engineering Division. He was responsible for materials process development and characterization, product management, and corrosion engineering, supporting the advanced exploration and manufacturing needs aligned with agency strategic vectors. While in this position, Gill led the production for the EFT-1 multi-purpose crew vehicle stage adaptor (MSA) providing the structural interface for Orion and the Delta IV launch system supporting the EFT-1 Orion Flight Test.

Throughout his career, Gill has received various awards including the NASA Honor Award Exceptional Achievement Medal, Director’s Commendation Honor Award, Safety Flight Awareness Awards, 24th STEM Global Competitiveness Conference Black Engineer of the Year Award – Modern Day Technology Leader distinction.

Director Gill earned his bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Oakwood University in 1996 and his master’s degree in industrial and systems engineering from the University of Alabama – Huntsville in 2007. He resides in Huntsville, AL with his wife, Arnissa and daughter, Addison.
1 min read

# Torque Calibration

### Heather F. Riley

Jun 03, 2015

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

***NASA WSTF***

Our torque (i. e. rotational force) calibration process is based on a calculation between a known length, distance, and force to determine the torque generated. 
            - Scope:  3 oz-in to 2,100 lb-ft
            - Instrument Types:  Torque Wrenches, Torque Screwdrivers, Torque Testers, Torque Analyzers
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2


Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John A. Howard, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
       or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
       the Report.



/s/ John A. Howard, Jr.
-----------------------
John A. Howard, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003


                                       28