alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001
May 26, 2022

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Maryland
Space Business Roundtable (MSBR) Lunch on June 21, 2022

On June 21, 2022, the Maryland Space Business Roundtable (MSBR), a nonprofit
organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a lunch at the Martin’s
Crosswinds in Greenbelt, MD, starting at 11:30 a.m. The guest speaker is U.S. Senator Ben
Cardin, Maryland.

Approximately 250 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies,
academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all
food and beverages, is $40 per person. MSBR is in control of the organizing, planning and
invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements
of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including
NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under
Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests
of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the
individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their
duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the
interests of the MSBR, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or
administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local
ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to
exercise any COVID-19 precautioy’s appropriate to their individual situation.

Ce lL 4Py—

Adam F. Greenstone
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH GRILLO.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT (23)





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have issued our report, dated March 25, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-43426, effective August 10, 2000), and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-46860, effective September 28, 2000).







/s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP







Atlanta, Georgia


March 25, 2011
#### Hines *v.*Kinnison and Another.

According to the act of 1843, if a writ be in trespass, and the declaration describe a cause of action in case, or if a writ be in case, and the declaration describe a cause of action in trespass, the declaration is not objectionable on account of the variance.

The said statute renders it immaterial whether the action be named trespass or case in the writ.

The rule as to the joinder of counts in trespass and case is not affected by%said statute.

Counts in trespass and trover cannot be joined.

ERROR to the *Yermillion*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of trespass on the case brought by *Kinnison*and another. The declaration contains four counts. The first charges that the defendant, *Hines,*on, &c., at, &c., by his agent and servant, seized and took certain goods and chattels, to wit, 500 bushels of corn, the property of the plaintiffs, then and there standing upon the stalk in the field where the same had grown, &c., of great value, &c.; and afterwards, to wit, on, &c., at, &c., sold said goods and chattels, and converted the same to his owlr use. The fourth count is in trover. There was a demurrer to the declaration, but the demurrer was overruled, and final judgment rendered for the plaintiffs.

The first count is in trespass, and it cannot therefore, unless authorized by statute, be joined with the count in trover. *120Gould, 220.' The statute on which the plaintiff relies to show there is no misjoinder is as follows: “In all actions of trespass and trespass on the case, the declaration shall be deemed equally good and valid to all intents and purposes, whether the same shall be in form a declaration in trespass or trespass on the case.” R. S. 1843, p. 691. According to this statute, if the writ be in trespass, and the declaration describe a cause of action in case, or if the writ be in case, and the declaration describe a cause of action in trespass, the declaration shall not be objected to on account of the variance. The statute renders it immaterial whether the action be named trespass or case in the writ. The rule as to the joinder of counts in trespass and case remains as it was before the statute.

*W. P. Bryant, J. A. Wright,*and *8. F. Maxwell,*for the plaintiff. *(*

*D. Brier,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam. The judgment is reversed'with costs. Cause remapded, &c.*

The judgment is reversed'with costs. Cause remapded, &c.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Pontchartrain Partners, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 63004, 63176

)

Under Contract No. W9126G

- 18

- D

- 0049

D.O. W9126G

- 18

- F

- 0418 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : James R. Washington, III, Esq.

Pontchartrain Partners LLC

New Orleans, LA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Blake M. Hedgecock, Esq.

Jennifer M. Dorsey, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District , F ort Worth

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 10, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63004, 63176

, Appeals of

Pontchartrain Partners, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 11, 2023 KENNETH D. WOODROW

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2756]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices, Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2010-1508 published on page 
4394 of the issue for Wednesday, January 27, 2010.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago heading, the entry for 
Vernon R. Pfaff, Fairbury, Indiana, is revised to read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Vernon R. Pfaff, individually, and as part of a group acting in 
concert with Barbara Ann Pfaff, both of Fairbury, Nebraska, to acquire 
voting shares of United Commerce Bancorp, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of United Commerce Bank, both Bloomington, 
Indiana.
    Comments on this application must be received by February 17, 2010.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 4, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-2756 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
August 13, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KERRY A. KILBURN AND CYNTHIA H. KILBURN, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00011-CV V.

FORT BEND COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Fort Bend 

County Drainage District, signed December 11, 2012, was heard on the transcript 

of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We 

therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the 

cause for proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Fort Bend County Drainage District.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Artemis I Launch

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft launches on the Artemis I flight test, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022, from Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. NASA’s Artemis I mission is the first integrated flight test of the agency’s deep space exploration systems: the Orion spacecraft, Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, and ground systems. SLS and Orion launched at 1:47 a.m. EST, from Launch Pad 39B at the Kennedy Space Center. Photo Credit: (NASA/Keegan Barber)

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-nhq202211160110/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 16, 2022ProducerHQImage CreditNASA/Keegan BarberSize1920x1342pxPIA NumberNHQ202211160110National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 02, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL 1999 AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         109,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                       728
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,207
<PP&E>                                           2,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                     950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,102
<SALES>                                         11,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,098
<CGS>                                            4,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,768)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.70)


</TABLE>
1 min read

# Helix Nebula

### NASA

Sep 03, 2020

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

When a star like the Sun runs out of fuel, it expands and its outer layers puff off, and then the core of the star shrinks. This phase is known as a “planetary nebula,” and astronomers expect our Sun will experience this in about 5 billion years. This Helix Nebula images contains infrared data from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope (green and red), optical light from Hubble (orange and blue), ultraviolet from NASA’s Galaxy Evolution Explorer (cyan), and Chandra’s X-rays (appearing as white) showing the white dwarf star that formed in the center of the nebula. The image is about four light years across.

Image credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC; Ultraviolet: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSC; Optical: NASA/STScI(M. Meixner)/ESA/NRAO(T.A. Rector); Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech/K. Su

Read feature
II 

Calendar No 542 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1887 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation on 

prescribing drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in group 

practices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2003 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. BIDEN and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient 

limitation on prescribing drug addiction treatments by 

medical practitioners in group practices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1887 RS 

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE 30-PATIENT LIMIT FOR 

2 GROUP PRACTICES. 

3 Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substance Act 

4 (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause 

5 (iv). 

Calendar No. 542 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1887 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the 

practices. treatments by medical practitioners in group patient limitation on prescribing drug addiction 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Reported without amendment
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 119 V

Filed: November 8, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

DANIEL BOITS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)

Brenton Aaron Elswick , Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA , for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On January 24, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that

, as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 1, 2016, he suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) . Petit ion at 1

- 4 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasio n of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 N ational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012 ).2

On November 5, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “ based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. ”

Id. at 5 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 13(a)( 1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 11(c)(1)(D))

.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                    COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                                June 30               June 30
                                                           -------------------    -----------------
                                                             2000        1999        2000     1999
                                                           --------     ------    ---------  -------
<S>                                                        <C>          <C>       <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                                           16,358      16,895     16,563    16,743
                                                           ========     =======   ========   =======

Net income                                                 $(23,571)    $11,570   $(29,837)  $22,998
                                                           ========     =======   ========   =======

Basic earnings per share                                   $  (1.44)    $  0.68   $  (1.80)  $  1.37
                                                           ========     =======   ========   =======
</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT RICHARDS.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*106)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65624-65625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Attendance at North American Electric Reliability 
Corporation Meetings

October 19, 2010.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that 
members of the Commission and Commission staff may attend the following 
North American Electric Reliability Corporation meetings:

NERC Board of Trustees Meeting

    November 3, 2010, Wednesday, Atlanta, GA, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. ET, 
(Member Representatives Committee).
    November 4, 2010, Thursday, Atlanta, GA, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. ET.
    The meetings scheduled to be held in Atlanta will take place at:
    Grand Hyatt Atlanta--Buckhead, 3300 Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, 
GA 30305.
    Further information may be found at http://www.nerc.com.
    The above-referenced meetings are open to the public.
    The discussions at each of the meetings described above may address 
matters at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. RC08-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RC08-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD09-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-6, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-8, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-10, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;

[[Page 65625]]

Docket No. RD10-12, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-14, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RD10-15, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR08-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR09-6, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR10-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR10-6, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR10-7, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR10-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation;
Docket No. RR10-13, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    For more information, contact Jonathan First, Special Reliability 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel--Energy Markets, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8529 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#553f3a3b34213d343b7b333c27262115333027367b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1bbbebfb0a5b9b0bfffb7b8a3a2a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26989 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>