alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                               8,308
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      143,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,748
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   156,561
<PP&E>                                             134,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                      98,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     332,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              142,712
<BONDS>                                            108,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,528
<OTHER-SE>                                          63,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       332,836
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   269,063
<CGS>                                              220,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      257,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      9,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                      OBJECTIVE SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED        SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                       DECEMBER 31,             DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ---------------------    --------------------
                                                   1996        1995          1996     1995
                                                 ---------- ----------    ---------- ---------

<S>                                              <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
Net income                                          $   534    $ 4,006       $ 2,887   $ 5,108
                                                 ========== ==========    ========== =========

Weighted average common and preferred
 shares outstanding                                  32,062     28,228        31,770    27,633

Equivalent shares from options granted                    
 during twelve month period prior to
 the Company's initial public offering                    -        788             -       788

Equivalent shares attributed to
 options, (treasury  stock method)                    2,155      3,790         2,372     3,690
                                                 ---------- ----------    ---------- ---------
Weighted average common and equivalent shares        34,217     32,806        34,142    32,111
                                                 ========== ==========    ========== =========
Net income per share                                $   .02    $   .12       $   .08   $   .16
                                                 ========== ==========    ========== =========

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7204
JASON REDDITT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00356-jct) Submitted: November 14, 2007 Decided: December 3, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason Redditt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jason Redditt, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Redditt v. O’Brien , No. 7:07-cv-00356-jct (W.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
NPD ____.__

Effective Date: Jan. 1, 2008

Expiration Date:

COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY

________________________________________________________________________

Subject: News Media Access

Responsible Office: Office of Security and Program Protection

1. Policy

It is NASA policy to –

a. Control access to the NASA Headquarters building. The Headquarters' James 

Webb auditorium is exempt from this policy. The Webb auditorium is open to 

the public and badges are not required for access.

b. Encourage, but not require, media representatives to arrange interviews with 

NASA Headquarters employees through the Headquarters Office of Public 

Affairs.

c. Process and badge all media representatives, as is the policy for all NASA 

visitors who enter Headquarters for meetings with NASA employees.

i. Upon a media representative’s arrival at Headquarters, security 

officers on duty in the visitor center will contact the individual with 

whom the media representative has an appointment or with whom 

the media representative wishes to meet. Upon confirmation that 

the employee agrees to the meeting, the media representative will 

be provided a visitor badge and directed to the appropriate office.

ii. Media representatives with support personnel such as camera 

crews and photographers, who require additional time prior to the 

appointment to set up their equipment, should notify their NASA 

contacts in advance to ensure adequate access time prior to 

interviews or meetings.

d. Subject media representatives to the same security procedures required 

for all NASA visitors.

NASA

Policy

Directive
2. Applicability

This NPD applies to NASA Headquarters.

3. Authority

a. 42 U.S.C. 2455, 2473(c).

b. Sections 203(c) and 304 of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 

1958 as amended.

4. References

a. NPR1600.1 NASA Security Program Procedural Requirements

b. NPD 1600.2D NASA Security Policy.

5. Responsibility

a. The NASA Assistant Administrator for Security and Program Protection 

has the ultimate responsibility on behalf of the Administrator and the 

agency for oversight and management of security.

b. The NASA Assistant Administrator for Public Affairs is responsible for 

ensuring that NASA Public Affairs Officers are available to support NASA 

employees in meetings with news media representatives, if such support 

is requested.

c. The NASA security guard on duty in the visitor center will provide visitor 

credentials and allow entry to media representatives who have a 

confirmed appointment with a NASA employee.

d. News media representatives are responsible for obtaining a Headquarters 

visitor badge before gaining admittance to the Headquarters building.

6. Delegation of Authority

None
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1825

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for the 
       sale and use of unauthorized mobile infrared transmitters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2003

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for the 
       sale and use of unauthorized mobile infrared transmitters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Intersections Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. OFFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec.  39. Mobile infrared transmitters
    ``(a) In General.--Whoever--
            ``(1) provides for sale to unauthorized users a mobile 
        infrared transmitter in or affecting interstate or foreign 
        commerce shall be fined not more than $10,000, imprisoned not 
        more than 1 year, or both; and
            ``(2) is an unauthorized user in possession of a mobile 
        infrared transmitter in a motor vehicle in or affecting 
        interstate or foreign commerce shall be fined not more than 
        $10,000, imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
    ``(b) Definition.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `mobile infrared transmitter' means any 
        device or mechanism that emits infrared signals with the 
        purpose of changing a traffic signal; and
            ``(2) the term `unauthorized user' means a user of a mobile 
        infrared transmitter who is not authorized to use the 
        transmitter for official government purposes.''.
    (b) Chapter Analysis.--The chapter analysis for chapter 2 of title 
18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item for 
section 39 the following:

``39. Mobile infrared transmitters.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1789 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1789

  To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther 
  King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands owned by the City of 
               Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2003

  Mr. Miller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther 
  King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands owned by the City of 
               Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Martin Luther King, Junior, National 
Historic Site Land Exchange Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Public Law 96-438 established the Martin Luther King, 
        Junior, National Historic Site, and allows acquisition, by 
        donation only, of lands owned by the State.
            (2) The National Park Service owns a vacant lot that has no 
        historic significance. The City of Atlanta has expressed 
        interest in acquiring this property to encourage commercial 
        development along Edgewood Avenue.
            (3) The National Historic Site Visitor Center and Museum is 
        land-locked and has no emergency ingress or egress, making it 
        virtually impossible for firefighting equipment to reach.
            (4) The acquisition of city-owned property would enable the 
        National Park Service to establish easy street access to the 
        National Historic Site Visitor Center and Museum, and would 
        benefit the City by exchanging a piece of property that the 
        City could develop.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to authorize the exchange 
of certain lands within the Martin Luther King, Junior, National 
Historic Site for lands owned by the City of Atlanta, Georgia.

SEC. 3. LAND EXCHANGE.

    Section 2(b)(1) of the Act of October 10, 1980 (Public Law 96-428; 
94 Stat. 1839; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking the period 
and inserting ``or exchange.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Derma
Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.

|                          |                                                                                                              | 
|------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Dated:  November 12, 2009 | /s/ John E. Yetter                                                                                           | 
|                          | John E. Yetter, CPA
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer) |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                                  ODWALLA, INC.

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three Months Ended            Nine months Ended
                                    ------------------------      ------------------------
                                      May 31,        May 31,        May 31,        May 31,
                                       1996           1997           1996           1997
                                    ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                 <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>      

Weighted average shares of
      common stock outstanding
      for the period                4,930,000      4,993,000      4,914,000      4,976,000

Weighted  average common
      share equivalents (1)           512,000           --          494,000           --
                                    ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

Shares used in computing
      net earnings per share        5,442,000      4,993,000      5,408,000      4,976,000
                                    =========      =========      =========      =========
</TABLE>



(1)   The effect of common stock equivalents is not presented for 1997 as it
      would be anti-dilutive. 


                                       27
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1790

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. 

McCloskey Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2003

Mr. BAYH (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FRANCIS X. MCCLOSKEY POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloom7 ington, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’. 
2

•S 1790 IS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Francis X. McCloskey 

5 Post Office Building.

Æ
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 181

To require a review of accounting treatment of stock option plans, and 

the establishment of an appropriate stock option accounting principle 

within 1 year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2003

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL

To require a review of accounting treatment of stock option 

plans, and the establishment of an appropriate stock 

option accounting principle within 1 year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stock Option Account5 ing Review Act’’. 
2

•S 181 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF STOCK OPTION ACCOUNTING TREAT2 MENT. 

3 Section 108 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7218, 116 Stat. 768) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(e) STOCK OPTION ACCOUNTING TREATMENT.—

7 The standard setting body described in section 19(b)(1) 

8 of the Securities Act of 1933 shall, for purposes of estab9 lishing generally accepted accounting principles—

10 ‘‘(1) review the accounting treatment of em11 ployee stock options; and 

12 ‘‘(2) not later than 1 year after the date of en13 actment of this subsection, adopt an appropriate 

14 generally accepted accounting principle for the treat15 ment of employee stock options.’’.

Æ
Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 5, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01057-CV 

JUANA MEDRANO, Appellant 

V. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01905-C 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated September 19, 2014, we 

informed appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for 

or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file written 

verification that she had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or that she 

had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if she 

did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without 

further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, appellant has not provided the 

required documentation, nor has she otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status 

of the clerk’s record or this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

141057F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JUANA MEDRANO, Appellant 

No. 05-14-01057-CV V. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01905-C. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

COMPANY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant JUANA MEDRANO. 

Judgment entered February 5, 2015.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NexCen Brands, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, to the best of his knowledge and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 /s/
      Kenneth J. Hall
                          
                          October 6, 2009Kenneth
      J. HallChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Mark E. Stanko
                          
                          October 6, 2009Mark
      E. StankoChief
      Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NexCen Brands, Inc. and will be retained by NexCen Brands, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | The undersigned certify
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:                                                                                                                                        
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained
 in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                 

|      |                  |  |                        
|----- | ---------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: | November 8, 2010 |  | /s/ Sherman L. Black   
|      |                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|      |                  |  |                        
|      |                  |  |                        
|Date: | November 8, 2010 |  | /s/ James R. Stewart   
|      |                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

---