alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 417 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of civic education and civic involvement programs in the elementary 

and secondary schools of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2017 

Mr. ROSS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of civic education and civic involvement programs in the elementary and secondary schools 

of the United States. 

Whereas civic education, democratic engagement, governmental and constitutional knowledge, and social service in 

the United States are on the decline; 

Whereas in past decades, civic education was a prominent 

component of the curriculum in our Nation’s schools; and 

Whereas the advancement of civic education, democratic engagement, governmental and constitutional knowledge, 

and social service are essential for the future health and 

welfare of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 417 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) civic education, democratic engagement, 

4 governmental and constitutional knowledge, and so5 cial service are necessary to motivate and inspire fu6 ture leaders of the United States; 

7 (2) elementary and secondary schools in the 

8 United States are encouraged to offer courses pro9 moting civic education, democratic engagement, gov10 ernmental and constitutional knowledge, and social 

11 service such as civics, government, economics, geog12 raphy, history, and American history; 

13 (3) elementary and secondary schools in the 

14 United States are encouraged to integrate civic edu15 cation, democratic engagement, governmental and 

16 constitutional knowledge, and social service in elec17 tives such as art, English language arts, music, 

18 mathematics, and science; 

19 (4) in order to measure students’ basic civic 

20 knowledge, secondary schools in the United States 

21 are encouraged to administer a test to seniors based 

22 on the official list of 100 civics questions and an23 swers published and used by the Secretary of Home24 land Security for purposes of administering the 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 417 IH 

1 civics test component of naturalization examinations; 

2 and 

3 (5) elementary and secondary schools in the 

4 United States are encouraged to promote civic par5 ticipation and social service, at Federal, State, and 

6 local levels, and encourage such participation from 

7 students and families. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
# X-56A

The X-56A is scheduled for November flights to further investigate how highly-flexible, lightweight wings function.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/x-56a-2-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Aeronautics
Image CreditNASA / Lauren HughesSize1041x833pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 23, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Lillian Gipson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
****

**Source:** This document taken from the Report of Apollo 204 Review Board NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History Office, NASA Headquarters, Washington,DC. 

----

**REPORT OFAPOLLO 204REVIEW BOARD
TO
THE ADMINISTRATOR

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

**
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CARGO CONNECTION LOGISTICS HOLDING, INC.
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Cargo Connection Logistics Holding, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A (No. 1) for the year ending December 31, 2006,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Jesse Dobrinsky,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
the results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  November 27, 2007


                                                   /s/ Jesse Dobrinsky
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Jesse Dobrinsky
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 4.3




UNANIMOUS CONSENT IN LIEU OF A SPECIAL


MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF


CARGO CONNECTION LOGISTICS HOLDING, INC.




The undersigned, being all the directors (the "Board") of Cargo Connection Logistics Holding, Inc., a corporation of the State of Florida, ("Corporation"), does hereby authorize and approve the actions set forth in the following resolutions without the formality of convening a meeting, and does hereby consent to the following action of this Corporation, which actions are hereby deemed effective as of the date hereof;




WHEREAS, The Board deems it desirable and in the best interests of the Corporation to take the following actions;




NOW THEREFORE BE IT:




RESOLVED, that the Board hereby authorizes the issuance of options to purchase up to 1,000,000,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock, $0.001, par value, per share (the "Common Stock") to Scott Goodman in consideration for $100,000 of past due compensation from 2008, based upon the market price of $.0001 as of 12/31/09, and such options are exercisable for a period of three years from the date hereof;




RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Corporation (each an "Officer" and collectively, the "Officers") are, and each individually acting alone is hereby authorized and instructed, for and in the name of the Corporation, to execute and deliver all other agreements, schedules, exhibits and to take such other actions as may be necessary, appropriate or advisable to carry out the intent of the foregoing resolution; and be it




RESOLVED FURTHER, that all actions heretofore taken by the Officers, Directors, employees and agents of, and attorneys for, the Corporation in connection with the transactions contemplated by the foregoing resolutions be, and they hereby are, ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects.




The undersigned, by affixing their signatures hereto, does hereby consents to, authorizes and approves the foregoing actions in their capacity as the directors of CARGO CONNECTION LOGISTICS HOLDING, INC.




Dated: December 31, 2009






/s/ Scott Goodman






/s/ Jesse Dobrinsky
rmbl_ex101





  Exhibit 10.1











 



COVID-19 STIMULUS

 



CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

 


In
using the services of Wood & Huston Bank ("Bank"), to submit a
Small Business Interruption Loan Application to the Small Business
Administration ("SBA") under the Cares Act, RumbleOn Inc.
("CLIENT") understands and agrees:


 


1.
Client is responsible for instructing Bank regarding the amount of
the loan for which Client wishes to apply.


 


2.
Client is responsible for supporting the requested loan amount with
client's own documentation, information and the accuracy of which
is Client's sole responsibility.


 


3.
Client understands that submission of a loan application does not
guarantee that the SBA will approve or make the requested
loan.


 


4.
Client understands that the requested loan, if approved by the SBA,
may or may not qualify for forgiveness.


 


5.
Client understands that if the requested loan does not qualify for
forgiveness, Client must repay the loan, under the terms contained
in the loan documents.


 


6.
Client understands and agrees that Bank is not liable for delays in
transmission of the application or for any failure by the SBA to
receive the Application.


 


7.
Client understands and agrees that Bank is not responsible for
SBA's approval or disapproval of the Application.


 


8.
Client releases Bank from any claims arising out of Bank's
submission of Client's Application to the SBA.


 


9. If
Client is not an individual, signing agent for Client warrants and
represents that he/she is duly authorized and empowered to execute
this document, the related Loan Application and Promissory Note,
and any other documents in connection with the loan contemplated by
this Agreement.


 


	Thomas
Aucamp
	

 

	

 

	
/s/ Thomas
Aucamp


	

 


	
Name

	

 

	

 

	
Signature


	

 







 



5/1/2020


Date
Order entered August 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00376-CR

JOE HENRY MACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-80956-2013

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M IC HAEL R . JONES, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. THOM AS J. VILSAC K, Se c re ta ry of Agric ulture ; Unite d State s De p artm e nt of Agric ulture , Fore st Se rvic e , De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16262 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-01590-KJM C M K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Kim be rly J. M ue lle r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. M ic ha e l R . Jone s a

ppe a ls pro se the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism i ssing his e m ploy m e nt a c tion a s duplic ative . W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a

buse of disc re tion, A d

ams v . C al. De p’t of He alth Se rv

s. , 487 

# FIL ED DEC 3 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).F.3d 684, 688 (9th C ir. 2007), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in dism issing Jone s’ a c tion a s duplic ative of his c la im s in J one s v . Fore st Se rv ic e , No. 2:11-c v-2972-GEB -C M K, be c a use the c l a im s , re lie f sought, a nd pa rtie s a re the sam e . Se eAdams , 487 F.3d a t 688-94 (listing the

fa c tors for de te rm ining whe the r c la im s a re duplic ative , e xpla ining tha

t two e ve nts a

rise out of thesa

m e nuc le u s of fa c t s if the y are re late d and c an be c onve nie ntly trie d toge the r, an d noting the distric t c ourt’ s broa d disc re tion in de c iding how to dispose of a late r-file d, duplic ative a c tion). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing Jone s’ m otions for re c o nside ration be c a

use Jone s fa ile d to e sta

blish a ny ba sis for re lie f. S

e e Sc h. Dist. N o. 1J , Multnomah C

nty ., Or. v . AC

andS, Inc . , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th C ir. 1993) (se tting forth sta

nda rd of re v ie w a

nd grounds for re c onside ration unde r Fe d . R . C iv. P. 59(e ) and 60(b)). Jone s’ m otion for c o rre c tions, file d on Se pte m be r 18, 2014, a

nd his m otion to c o nsolida

te this a ppe a l with a

ppe a l nos. 14-16599 a

nd 14-16875, file d on Oc tobe r 8, 2015, a

re de nie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 2 6 2 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 5, 2012

s1128 

# Order

December 5, 2012

144930

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144930

COA: 307968

Wayne CC: 08

- 010774;

DAVID BLAKE HUDSON, 08

- 013877

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. With regard to the motion for

relief from judgment that was denied by the Wayne Circuit Court on June 14, 2011, th e

defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR

6.508(D). With regard to the motion for relief from judgment that was denied by the

Wayne Circuit Court on August 2, 2011, the defendant’s motion for relief from jud gment

is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-96235) pertaining to The 1996 Stock Option Plan and The 1999 Stock
Option and Grant Plan of MCK Communications, Inc., the registration statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-49946) pertaining to The 2000 Director Stock Option Plan of
MCK Communications, Inc., and the registration statement (Form S-8 No.
333-51218) pertaining to The 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of MCK
Communications, Inc. of our report dated June 6, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of MCK Communications, Inc. included in the
annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2003.


                                     /s/ Ernst Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 26, 2003
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DANA LYDELL SMITH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES

MARSHALS SERVICE; VETERANS

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-4025

(D.C. No. 2:09-CV-00985-DS)

(D. of Utah)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4025 Document: 01018384945 Date Filed: 03/16/2010 Page: 1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: The City of Denton v. Randy Turner, Obo Terrill, Turmer a/k/a Terrell Turner, deceased, Liz Chavez, Shannon Hodge, Kevin Wong, Scott Minnick and Holly Pride, et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 23

- 00051

- CV

Trial court case number: 2021

- 24797

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

On February 9, 2023, Appellant

, The City of Denton ( “ A p pellant ” )

, filed a n Unopposed

Motion to Dismiss A p peal with Prejudice ( “ M otion to Dismiss ” ). The certificate o f service o n the Motion to Dis miss does not compl y with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5. Specifically, the certificate of service does not indicate the Mot ion to Dismiss was served “ on all parties to the proce ed ing ” and the date and manner of serv ice for all parties. T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 9.5(a), (e). While the certificate of service attached to the Motion to Dismiss indicates the

Motion was served “ on all counsel of record . . . via electronic transmission

, ” the a ttached

A uto mated C ertifica te of e S ervice reflects only that Appellant ’ s counsel was served

. Appellant ’ s Motion to Dismiss is struck. The Court will consider a motion to dismiss that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5. T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 9 .5

.

It i s so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Ver onica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: February 16, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1874 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1874

  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2003

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENATE CANDIDATES REQUIRED TO FILE ELECTION REPORTS IN 
              ELECTRONIC FORM.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(a)(11)(D) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 434(a)(11)(D)) is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(D) As used in this paragraph, the terms 
                `designation', `statement', or `report' mean a 
                designation, statement or report, respectively, which--
                            ``(i) is required by this Act to be filed 
                        with the Commission, or
                            ``(ii) is required under section 302(g) to 
                        be filed with the Secretary of the Senate and 
                        forwarded by the Secretary to the Commission.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 302(g)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(2)) is 
        amended by inserting ``or 1 working day in the case of a 
        designation, statement, or report filed electronically'' after 
        ``2 working days''.
            (2) Section 304(a)(11)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
        434(a)(11)(B)) is amended by inserting ``or filed with the 
        Secretary of the Senate under section 302(g)(1) and forwarded 
        to the Commission'' after ``Act''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any designation, statement, or report required to be filed 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCEO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  | 
|Dated: June 14, 2004. |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES C. FLORESJames C. Flores Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-13-0001479 

18-MAY-2015 

10:46 AM 

SCWC-13-0001479
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

LIONEL LETOTO,


Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-13-0001479; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0051; FC-CR. NO. 06-1-0017)
 

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of petitioner’s May 4, 2015, motion
 

for reconsideration of this court’s order rejecting application
 

for writ of certiorari, filed on April 8, 2015, and pursuant to
 

HRAP Rule 40.1(h), neither acceptance nor rejection of an
 

application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion
 

for reconsideration. Therefore,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
 

reconsideration is dismissed. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 18, 2015.
 

Lionel Letoto 

petitioner pro se


on the motion 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson