alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"agency":"MSPB","generated":"2021-07-29 12:18:52","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["MSPB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["46"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["44"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["63"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q3"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7616

JEROME ALEXANDER RIDDICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN OF BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-465-AM)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Alexander Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on October 13, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Alexander Riddick appeals the district court’s order

granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Riddick v. Warden of Brunswick Correctional Ctr,

No. CA-98-465-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
2 min read

# 7th Annual CineSpace Short Film Competition Now Accepting Submissions

### Mark A. Garcia

Mar 01, 2021

RELEASEJ21-001

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

HOUSTON, TX – NASA and the Houston Cinema Arts Society (HCAS) open submissions for the 2021 CineSpace International Short Film Competition on March 1, kicking off the seventh year of the film competition. The deadline for submissions closes July 14, 2021 at 2 p.m. CDT.

The competition offers creators around the world a chance to share their films inspired by and using NASA imagery, enabling curiosity and fostering creative relationships at the intersection of art and science. Submissions featuring real NASA footage from 60 years of space exploration will be judged on creativity, innovation and attention to detail. As in previous years, filmmakers will compete for $26,000 in cash prizes, with awards going to the top three overall winners and winners of two special categories: *Best Educational Film on Space and Science* and*Film That Best Depicts Unity and Inclusion in Science*.

Filmmakers of all experience levels from around the world are welcome to submit their films for consideration. The competition is inclusive of all genres, including narrative, documentary, comedy, drama, animation, experimental and others. Films will be submitted to the content creation platform Tongal. Film entries must be no more than 10 minutes and contain at least 10 percent of publicly available NASA imagery. Finalists are selected from the submissions and reviewed by Academy Award ® nominee Richard Linklater who awards the first, second, and third place prizes.

Finalists will be announced alongside the lineup of the 2021 Houston Cinema Arts Festival in October 2021. At the 13th Annual Houston Cinema Arts Festival taking place November 11 – 15, 2021, winners of this year’s competition will be announced and awarded their prizes.  Finalists and winners may be screened at other film festivals across the country, in schools and museums, on NASA TV and even onboard the International Space Station.

Houston Cinema Arts Society (HCAS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to presenting unique and innovative film programs, multimedia installations and performances, and educational opportunities to engage, enrich, and empower Houston’s diverse communities and cultures.

For more information on CineSpace, competition guidelines and the submission process, and to view past winners and finalists, visit:

http://www.cinespace.org

Find NASA video and imagery at:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/cinespace-film-competition-2021/

Learn about NASA’s innovative and collaborative efforts at:

Look for more about the Houston Cinema Arts Society at:

cinemahtx.org

Leah CheshierJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111leah.d.cheshier@nasa.gov
SEC Reference 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Cloudweb, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Zhi De Liao, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and






(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Zhi De LiaoZhi De LiaoPrincipal Executive Officer

Principal Financial OfficerDate: April 14, 2016
#### J. L. H. ROUNTREE and Donald C. Duke, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. VARCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants.

No. 78-2157.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 24, 1980.

Oscar Nipper, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants cross-appellees.

Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, Tex., William P. Green, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees cross-appellants.

Before THORNBERRY, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr. and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED on the basis of the opinion of the district court (Judge Robert O’Conor, Jr.), *Rountree v. Varco International, Inc.,*486 F.Supp. 3 (S.D.Tex. 1978).
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From 
the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice supplements the list of ``Indian Entities 
Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States 
Bureau of Indian Affairs,'' published in the Federal Register on 
October 1, 2010, and announces that, as of October 1, 2010, the 
Shinnecock Indian Nation is an Indian entity recognized and eligible to 
receive services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Colliflower, Bureau of 
Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, Mail Stop 4513-
MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. Telephone number: (202) 
513-7641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice supplements the list of Indian 
entities recognized and eligible to receive services from the BIA dated 
September 22, 2010, and published in the Federal Register on October 1, 
2010, pursuant to Section 104 of the Act of November 2, 1994 (Pub. L. 
103-454; 108 Stat. 4791, 4792), and in exercise of authority delegated 
to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs under 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9, 43 
U.S.C. 1457, and 209 DM 8. As of October 1, 2010, the Shinnecock Indian 
Nation, New York, is an Indian entity recognized and eligible to 
receive services from the BIA. This addition to the list of Indian 
entities results from the October 1, 2010, Interior Board of Indian 
Appeals order dismissing requests for reconsideration in docket numbers 
IBIA 10-112 and 10-116, In Re Federal Acknowledgment of the Shinnecock 
Indian Nation.

    Dated: October 19, 2010.
Paul Tsosie,
Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-27138 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132801 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE ESTATE OF CECIL C. WARREN, JR., 

Deceased. 

_________________________________________ 

CINDY WARREN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 132801 

 COA: 262937 

JEFFREY J. WARREN, SUSAN WARREN and

SUSAN VALDISERRI, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of CECIL C. WARREN, JR.,

Deceased, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

Saginaw PC: 04-116725-DE 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
2000 BONUS PLAN FOR CERTAIN KEY EMPLOYEES


     The Company has a discretionary bonus program under which exempt
salaried employees (other than the CEO and Chairman) may be paid bonuses
based on a percentage of base annual salary.  The CEO and Chairman
participate in this plan, however their bonuses are specifically determined
by the board of directors.  The bonus percent is based on a variety of
guidelines including the performance levels of the respective business units
measured by earnings before tax.









































                                      -1-
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,630]


Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (``PwC''), Internal Firm Services 
Client Account Administrators Group Atlanta, GA; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on May 20, 2010, applicable to workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 
Division of Internal Firm Services, Atlanta, Georgia. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2010 (75 FR 32224).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers supply 
internal firm services.
    New information shows that the Department did not correctly state 
the subject firm name in its entirety on the certification decision. 
The correct name of the subject firm should read PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP (``PwC''), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators 
Group.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
correct the name of the subject firm to read PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
(``PwC''), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators Group.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,630 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (``PwC''), Internal 
Firm Services Client Account Administrator Group, Atlanta, Georgia, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after March 2, 2009, through May 20, 2012, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
the date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27387 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

May 11, 2022
Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the National
Aeronautic Association Robert J. Collier Awards Dinner on June 9, 2022

On June 9, 2022, the National Aeronautic Association (NAA), a nonprofit organization under
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host an awards dinner at the Marriott Marquis
Hotel in Washington, DC from 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. The event is to provide a venue for
informal discussion on current challenges the aerospace community is facing. At the dinner,
awards will be presented to various individuals and teams for outstanding contribution in the
aerospace industry, including the Robert J. Collier Trophy be awarded to the NASA/JPL
Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Team.

Approximately 5,000 people have been invited to attend the dinner reception. Attendees will
have a diversity of views or interests and will include representatives of the legislative branch,
personnel from academia, industry representatives, employees of Federal agencies, members
of the public, and media. The estimated value of the event, including all food and beverages,
is $130 per person. The NAA is in control of the all the organizing, planning and invitations
for the event.

Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding
various NASA programs. There is also an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend
these events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas
and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. | find that the event
meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g).

Accordingly, NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the
interests of the NAA—including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required
to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989—may accept an invitation from the
NAA for free attendance for themselves and a guest to this event. In those circumstances, I
find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may
be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.


However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the
interests of the NAA, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or
administering a Space Act Agreement, or who receive an invitation from a party other than
the event host, NAA, should seek a separate determination from their local NASA ethics
office as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to exercise any
COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation.

BZD

Adam F. Greenstone
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained
 in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                 

|      |                  |  |                         | 
|----- | ---------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|Date: | November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Bernard P. Aldrich  | 
|      |                  |  | Chief Executive Officer | 
|      |                  |  |                         | 
|Date: | November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Robert M. Wolf      | 
|      |                  |  | Chief Financial Officer | 

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92467, 333-37584 and 333-62336) of Crossroads
Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated November 26, 2002 relating to
the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
November 26, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Austin, Texas
January 28, 2003
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


 May 7, 2020 


 


 m+ Buffered Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 1-8 


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


		Re:	 m+ funds Trust, Series 1-8 (the “Trust”) 



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


 We have examined Amendment No.1 to the
Registration Statement (File No. 333-235759) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator. 


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy
of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 










	 	Very
    truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia
    Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Oscar Loynaz	 	 
	 	 	Name:
    Oscar Loynaz	 
	 	 	Title:  Managing
    Director
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37253

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CARLOS PAZ-HEREDIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 602

Filed: August 24, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of three years, for rape, affirmed.

Daniel S. Brown of Fuller Law Offices, Twin Falls, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GRATTON, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Carlos Paz-Heredia was convicted of rape, Idaho Code § 18-6101. The district court 

imposed a unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. 

Paz-Heredia appeals, contending that the sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 
2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Paz-Heredia’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.