alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mission Name Launch Date Deployment 

Status

Rocket Mission Description SC 

Envelope

Payload(s) Organization(s) Orbit

Mini-Carb (CNGB, CubeSat 

Next Generation Bus)

12/5/19 02/01/2020 

07:15:00 

GMT

Falcon 9 A 6U CubeSat mission to fly a smaller, more ruggedized 

version of a patented mini-Laser Heterodyne 

Radiometer, or mini-LHR, on an LLNL-built CubeSat 

platform to potentially detect and measure amounts 

of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Although no 

on-orbit science atmospheric measurements was 

collected, the miniaturization and ruggedization of the 

instrument compatible with a small satellite platform 

is improving the credibility of the approach for NASA’s 

upcoming earth venture proposals. 

6U Laser heterodyne 

radiometer

Lawrence Livermore National 

Laboratory (LLNL) and NASA GSFC 

~500 km

AzTechSat-1 12/5/19 02/19/2020 

12:55:01 

GMT

Falcon 9 The first collaboration between NASA and the Mexican 

Space Agency on a 1U spaceflight mission that will 

demonstrate satellite-to-satellite communications for 

applications in space and on Earth. Specifically, it will 

“talk to” a network of telecommunications satellites 

already orbiting the Earth and contribute new data 

about this transmission strategy to developers of 

CubeSats. This could help deliver more data overall 

and potentially even reduce the costs associated with 

staffing ground stations to communicate with small 

satellite missions.

1U Globalstar Satellite 

transmitter Integrated 

Global Positioning 

System (GPS) Receiver 

(STINGR) modem and 

an ultra high 

frequency/very high 

frequency (UHF/VHF) 

amateur band radio

Mexican Space Agency and NASA ARC 400 km × 

400 km, 

51.6°

SORTIE (Scintillation 

Observations and Response 

of The Ionosphere to 

Electrodynamics)

12/5/19 02/19/2020 

17:40:00 

GMT

Falcon 9 A 6U CubeSat mission with an overall mission goal to 

study the complex challenges in discovering the wavelike plasma perturbations in the ionosphere with an 

ion velocity meter to measure the direction of 

ionospheric flows and a micro planar langmuir probe 

to measure ionospheric densities. This project was 

funded by a NASA Heliophysics Technology and 

Instrument Development (H-TIDeS) program grant.

6U Ion velocity meter ASTRA (Atmospheric and Space 

Technology Research Associates), AFRL 

(Air Force Research Laboratory), UTD 

(University of Texas, Dallas), COSMIAC 

(Configurable Space Microsystems 

Innovations & Applications Center), 

and Boston College.

400 km × 

400 km, 

51.6°

CryoCube-1 12/5/19 02/19/2020 

12:55:01 

GMT 

Falcon 9 3U CubeSat mission to perform on-orbit cryogenic 

fluid management experiments: fluid location sensing, 

slosh characteriation, cyrogenic fluid transfer. The 

payload is a pressure system instrumented with 

pressure sensor and 12 temperature sensors. 

3U Pressure system 

instrumented with 

pressure sensor and 

12 temperature 

sensors

NASA KSC and Sierra Lobo, Inc. 400 km × 

400 km, 

51.6°

CubeSat Launch Initiative ELaNa 25B
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                                                                                           |                                     |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                                                                           |
|                                  |                                                                                                                      |                                |
| Date: November                9, 2005 | By:                                                                                                                  | /s/ Daniel                J. Dorman |
|                                       | Daniel J. DormanPresident, CEO (Principal Executive Officer)                  and                  Principal Financial Officer |
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137305

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137305 COA: 283337 Wayne CC: 99-009228-FC MATTHEW BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
#### Leach *v.*Swann, Administrator.

It is no objection to a foreign attachment against *A.,*that the debt on which the writ is founded is evidenced by the joint and several note of *A.*and *B.*

The plaintiff in such attachment must prove, that the person who assisted the sheriff in making the inventory and appraisement of the property attached, was a householder of the county.

APPEAL from the *Union*Circuit Court.

Perkins, J.

Foreign attachment. The affidavit set forth an indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note. The writ of attachment issued and certain property was seized. At a subsequent term of the Court, the defendant, by attorney, filed a plea in abatement alleging that the note constituting the ground of indebtedness in the case, was executed jointly by the defendant and one *John Leach,*who was still alive and a resident of the state. Replication, that the note was several as well as joint. Demurrer to the replication, which *69was overruled, and the defendant refusing to answer further, the Court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of the note and costs, to be levied of the property attached, and directed a sale of the same.

*J. S. Reid,*for the appellant.

*J. Perry,*for the appellee.

It is contended that the Court erred, 1. In overruling the demurrer; 2. In rendering judgment.for the sale of the property attached.

The note being several as well as joint, the plaintiff had a right to proceed for the collecting of his debt singly against either of the makers of the note, if he chose to do so. The remedy was several as well as joint. The fact that the proceeding was by attachment did not, as we think, vary the rule. The replication, therefore, constituted a good answer to the plea, and the demurrer to it was rightly overruled.

The second error is well assigned. The evidence did not show that the requirements of the statute had been strictly complied with. This, it should have done. *O'Brien*v. *Daniel,*2 Blackf. 290. The statute (R. S. 1838, p. 80, sect. 3,) requires that the sheriff, after having taken property upon a writ of attachment, shall cause the same to be inventoried and appraised with the assistance of a credible householder of the county. In this case, the proof was that the inventory and appraisement were made with the assistance of *John Burk;*but whether *John Burk*was a householder, or a resident of the county, does not appear. For this defect, the judgment must be' reversed.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.2
                   COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        (in thousands, except per share)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                                June 30               June 30
                                                           -------------------    -----------------
                                                             1999        1998        1999     1998
                                                           --------     ------    ---------  -------
<S>                                                        <C>          <C>       <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding                                          16,358      16,895     16,563    16,743
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
 Stock options and warrants                                      --         327         --       347
 Convertible Subordinated Notes(1)                               --       2,075         --     2,075
                                                           --------     -------   --------   -------

Weighted average shares outstanding                          16,358      19,297     16,563    19,165
                                                           ========     =======   ========   =======
Net income                                                 $(23,571)    $11,710   $(29,837)  $22,998
                                                           ========     =======   ========   =======

Adjustment for interest expense assuming
Conversion of Subordinated Notes(1)                              --         804         --     2,412

Adjusted Net Income                                       $(23,571)     $12,374   $(29,837)  $25,140
                                                          ========      =======   ========   =======
Diluted earnings per share                                $  (1.44)     $  0.64   $  (1.80)  $  1.33
                                                          ========      =======   ========   =======
</TABLE>

(1) The Company's Convertible Subordinated Notes were dilutive for the periods
    presented.
National Space Council

Users’ Advisory Group 

Public Meeting Agenda

November 15, 2018

NASA HQ – Washington, DC

9:00 – 9:15 Opening Remarks

Jim Ellis, Jr. – UAG Chair

9:15 – 10:00 Welcome and NASA Update

Jim Bridenstine – NASA Administrator

10:00 – 10:15 Exploration & Discovery Subcommittee Report

Les Lyles – Subcommittee Chair

10:15 – 10:30 National Security Subcommittee Report 

Jim Ellis, Jr. – Subcommittee Chair

10:30 – 10:45 Economic Development/Industrial Base Subcommittee Report

Mary Lynne Dittmar and Eric Stallmer – Subcommittee Co-Chairs

10:45 - 11:00 Technology & Innovation Subcommittee Report 

Pam Melroy – Subcommittee Chair

11:00 – 11:15 Outreach & Education Subcommittee Report

Eileen Collins – Subcommittee Chair

11:15 – 11:30 Space Policy & International Engagement Subcommittee Report

David Wolf – Subcommittee Chair

11:30 – 12:15 Lunch Break
National Space Council

Users’ Advisory Group 

Public Meeting Agenda

November 15, 2018

NASA HQ – Washington, DC

12:15 – 12:30 Reconvene at NASA HQ

12:30 - 1:30 NASA Exploration Campaign Update

Tom Cremins – Acting NASA Chief of Staff &

Associate Administrator for Strategy & Plans

1:30 – 2:00 Prioritizing Space Science

Jim Crocker – Space Studies Board Vice Chair

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

2:00 – 3:00 National Security Space: Organization, Technology, and Policy

Mike Griffin – Undersecretary of Defense for Research & Engineering

John Rood – Undersecretary of Defense for Policy

3:00 – 3:30 Full UAG Discussion

3:30 – 3:45 Public Comment

3:45 Closing Remarks and Adjournment
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                 WORLDTEX, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Six Months Ended           Three Months Ended
                                               June 30,                   June 30,
                                            1997     1996           1997         1996
                                            ----     ----           ----         ----
<S>                                   <C>              <C>             <C>        <C>

Net income                            $    4,695        5,926          2,029      3,226
                                      ==========   ==========     ==========  ==========
Shares:
   Weighted average number 
     of shares outstanding            14,410,785   14,475,571     14,416,660  14,475,571
   Assumed exercise of options           424,745       95,394        323,783     115,948
                                      ----------   ----------     ----------  ---------
   Total average number of common
     and common equivalent
     shares used for primary 
     computation                      14,835,530   14,570,965     14,740,443  14,591,519
                                      ==========   ==========     ==========  ==========
Primary earnings per share (1)        $      .32          .41            .14         .22
                                      ==========   ==========     ==========  ==========
Shares:
   Weighted average number of shares
     outstanding                      14,410,785    14,475,571    14,416,660  14,475,571
   Assumed exercise of options           409,812       128,510       409,812     128,510
                                      ==========   ===========    ==========  ==========

   Total average number of common and
     common equivalent
     shares used for fully diluted
      computation                     14,820,597    14,604,081    14,826,472  14,604,081
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========  ==========

Fully diluted earnings per share (2)  $      .32           .41           .14        .22
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========  ==========

<FN>
(1)  Earnings per share are calculated based upon the weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding and common equivalent shares during the year.

(2)  Fully  diluted  earnings  per  share  calculations  result  in less than 3%
     reduction and are  accordingly  not considered as dilution in the financial
     statements.
</FN>
</TABLE>
#### Taylor *v.*Claypool.

A judgment in a suit against two persons on a joint promissory note, rendered against one of them, (the other not having been found,) is a bar to a subsequent suit against both on the same note.

*558*Saturday, May*29.

To authorize a judgment against *JL.*in a suit against him and *E.*on a joint contract (the former only having been found,) the plaintiff must show a good cause of action against both.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court.

*J.*Ryman, for the plaintiff.

*G.*Holland, for the defendant.

Blackford, *J.*

Taylor brought an action of assumpsit against *'William H. Moseley*and *William W.*Claypool, on a joint promissory note. The writ was returned *non est inventus*as to *Moseley. Claypool*appeared and pleaded as follows: That the plaintiff hei'etofore, &c., impleaded the defendant and Moseley, &c., for not performing the same promises, &c.; and that the plaintiff in that suit (it being suggested that the writ had been served on *Moseley*and not on *Claypool)*obtained a judgment against *Moseley*for the amount due, &c. General demurrer to the plea, and judgment for the defendant.

This is a joint action against *Moseley*and *Claypool;*and, to support it, the plaintiff must have a joint cause of action against the defendants (1). The plea shows, that the plaintiff has no such cause of action; because it shows that he had previously obtained judgment against *Moseley*on the note now sued on. The note, at least so far as *Moseley*is concerned, was merged in the judgment; and any suit in which he is a defendant, founded on the note, must be barred by that judgment. It is true that, by our statute, if a suit on a joint contract be brought against two, and one only can be found, judgment may be taken against him alone on whom process has been served. R. S. 1838, p. 446. But still, as the action is against both, a judgment against the one served vyith process cannot be obtained, unless the plaintiff can show that he has then subsisting a good cause of action against both. The case of *Sheehy*v. *Mandeville et*al., 6 Cranch, 253, seems to be opposed to the plea before us; but that case, as shown in *Robertson*v. Smith, 18 Johns. 459, cannot be supported.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

(1)

 According to that principle, the defendant in such case on whom process is served cannot set off a debt due to him alone from the plaintiff; but a debt which the plaintiff owes him and his co-defendant not served with process may be set off.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1(d)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                                 ONDISPLAY, INC.
                    THIRD RESTATED INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

      The Third Restated Investor Rights Agreement among OnDisplay, Inc.
("OnDisplay") and the investors who are parties thereto is hereby amended to add
PurchasePro.com, Inc. as an "Investor" party.

      This Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

Dated as of December 21, 1999

                                            ONDISPLAY, INC.


                                            By:_________________________________


                                    INVESTORS


Funds                                      Individuals
-----                                      -----------


_____________________________              _____________________________________
                                                         Signature

By:__________________________              _____________________________________
                                                           Print

By:__________________________
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Presidential Documents 67023 

Memorandum of September 20, 2010 

Delegation of Waiver Authority Pursuant to Section 107(a) of 

Public Law 110–457 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions conferred upon 

the President by section 107(a) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims 

Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–457). 

You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

WASHINGTON, September 20, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2010–27677 

Filed 10–29–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO5OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLID9570000.LL14200000.BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plats of Surveys.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has officially filed the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Idaho State Office, Boise, Idaho, effective 9:00 a.m., on the date specified.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709-1657.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to meet their administrative needs. The lands surveyed are: The plat constituting the entire survey record of the survey of certain islands in the Snake River, T. 1 S., R. 2 W. and T. 1 S., R. 3 W., Boise Meridian, Idaho, was accepted October 13, 2010.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Idaho State Office, Boise, Idaho, 30 days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        . This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to meet certain administrative and management purposes.                    

Dated: October 20, 2010.

Jeff A. Lee,

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.

[FR Doc. 2010-27348 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P