alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLID9570000.LL14200000.BJ0000]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Surveys.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has officially filed the 
plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Idaho State 
Office, Boise, Idaho, effective 9:00 a.m., on the date specified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South 
Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709-1657.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to meet their administrative needs. 
The lands surveyed are: The plat constituting the entire survey record 
of the survey of certain islands in the Snake River, T. 1 S., R. 2 W. 
and T. 1 S., R. 3 W., Boise Meridian, Idaho, was accepted October 13, 
2010.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Idaho State Office, 
Boise, Idaho, 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal 
Register. This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service to meet certain administrative and management 
purposes.

    Dated: October 20, 2010.
Jeff A. Lee,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 2010-27348 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Josie Ben Rubi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to OCTuS, Inc., and will be retained by OCTuS, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Josie Ben Rubi
--------------------------
Josie Ben Rubi
Chief Financial Officer
November 21, 2005
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2003


                                            BY: /s/ Paul S. Shipman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                    Paul S. Shipman
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,735
<SECURITIES>                                        13
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                        79
<INVENTORY>                                     15,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,353
<PP&E>                                           4,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,852
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,428
<SALES>                                         21,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,135
<CGS>                                           13,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                       809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
# FILED
March 22, 2000 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON
STANLEY A

DAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY v. ) C.C.A. No. ) W1999-02741-CCA-R 3-PC STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court o n the state’s motion, pursuant t o Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to affirm the trial court’s j udgment by order rather than formal opinion. This case represents an appeal f rom the dismissal of the petitioner’s third petition for post-conv iction relief. In 1991, the peti tioner was convic

ted of second degree murder and aggra vated robbery, and sentenc ed to 45 years as a Range III offender. The petitioner subsequently filed two petitions for post -conviction relief attacking this convi ction. The trial court deni ed both petitions and this Cour t affirmed the denials on appeal. See Stanley Adams v. State, Shelby County, No. 02C 01-9208- CR-00184 (Tenn. Crim. App., fil ed February 10, 1993, at Jackson); Stanley Adams v. State, Shelby County, No. 02C 01-9505-CR-00142 (Tenn. Cri m. App., filed February 18, 1997, at Jackson).
On March 2, 1999, the petitioner filed the present petition for pos t-conviction relief. The petitioner rais es the issues of ineffective assi stance of counsel and the validity of his pleas , which are the same iss ues he raised in his prev ious petitions.Finding that the petitioner had previously filed two petitions for post-c onviction relief and that the present petition is time barred, the trial cour t dismissed the petition.
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-202(c) pr ovides that no more than one peti tion for post-conviction reli ef may be filed attacking a si ngle judgment, and mandates that the trial court shall summar ily dismiss any s

econd or subsequent petition if a prior petition was filed and resolved on the merits by a court of c ompetent jurisdiction. Sin ce the petitioner previously filed two petitions that were resolved on the merits by the trial court and by this Court on appeal , the petitioner’s present petition was properly dismissed. Additionally, after reviewing the entire record on appeal, we find that the petitioner’s claim does not fall withi n one of the limited circumstances under which a prior petition may be re-opened. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-217.
Accordingly, w

e conclude that the trial cou rt did not err in dismis sing the petitioner’s petition for pos t-conviction relie

f. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance wi th Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. It appearing that the petitioner is indigent, costs of this appeal shall be taxed to the s tate.

______________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE CONCUR:______________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E

______________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99(B)


The following has been excerpted from a Letter Agreement, dated June 10, 1996,
and entered into between OSI and David M. Allen ("Letter Agreement").  This
exceprt sets forth the relevant provisions of the Letter Agreement relating to
the obligations of OSI in the event Mr. Allen's employment is terminated.


                                    * * * *

SEVERANCE:  In the event of involuntary termination, other than for cause, base
salary will continue to be paid for a period of one year from your termination
date.  In addition, you will be paid a pro-rated amount of incentive consistent
with your defined incentive program and based upon the portion of the year
completed at the time of termination.  Your stock option vesting will cease upon
termination in any event.

                                    * * * *
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

                                     NOTE

     For value received Impac Funding Corporation promises to pay to Impac
Mortgage Holdings, Inc., or order, the sum of ($14,500,000) fourteen million
five hundred thousand dollars with interest at the rate of 9.5% per annum from
June 30, 1999. Minimum payments of interest only in the amount of ($344,375.00)
three hundred forty four thousand three hundred seventy five dollars shall be
paid quarterly, with the first payment commencing on September 30, 1999 and
continuing thereafter until June 30, 2004 at which time any and all remaining
principal and interest shall be due and payable.

     It is agreed and understood that there is no prepayment penalty under this
obligation. It is further agreed and understood that this note constitutes and
shall be deemed to be a Senior Unsecured obligation of Impac Funding
Corporation.

     Each payment shall be credited first on interest then due and the remainder
on principal; and interest shall thereupon cease upon the principal so credited.
Should interest not be so paid it shall thereafter bear like interest, as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount
equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted
by law. Should default be made in payment of any installment of principal or
interest when due the whole sum of principal and interest shall become
immediately due at the option of the holder of this note. Principal and interest
payable in lawful money of the United States. If action were instituted on this
note we promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney's fees.

IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION

/s/ William S. Ashmore                  Date June 30, 1999
-----------------------------                ---------------

Name  William S. Ashmore
      ------------------------

Title  President
       -----------------------


                                        Date June 30, 1999
                                             ---------------

/s/ Richard J. Johnson

Name  Richard J. Johnson
      ------------------------

Title  Executive Vice President, CFO
       ------------------------------
II 

Calendar No. 332

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1692

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Hugh Gregg 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Mr. SUNUNU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, 

as the ‘‘Hugh Gregg Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HUGH GREGG POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New 
2

•S 1692 RS 

1 Hampshire, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hugh 

2 Gregg Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Hugh Gregg Post Of7 fice Building. 

Calendar No. 332

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1692

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, 

New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Hugh Gregg Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    Exhibit 27.1

                                 Worldtex, Inc.



THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM WORLDTEX,
INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  MARCH 31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                         18,782
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  49,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    2,134
<INVENTORY>                                                    53,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              125,255
<PP&E>                                                        137,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 38,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                318,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          38,172
<BONDS>                                                       185,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                          147
<OTHER-SE>                                                     76,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                318,476
<SALES>                                                        69,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               69,229
<CGS>                                                          55,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  55,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              4,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 3,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    1,193
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             2,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    2,151
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .15

        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph DESALME, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50206.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 27, 2003.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant US Attorney, Angela S. Raba, US Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Joseph DeSalme pleaded guilty to one charge of possession of a listed chemical with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The district court sentenced him to 170 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. DeSalme argues on appeal that the district court erred in declining to grant him the one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility found in U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b).

Because DeSalme did not raise this specific argument in the district court, the plain error standard of review applies. *See United States v. Rodriguez,*15 F.3d 408, 414 (5th Cir.1994). Under the plain-error standard, this court may correct forfeited errors only when the appellant shows: (1) there is an error, (2) that is clear and obvious, and (3) that affects his substantial rights. *United States v. Calverley,*37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc) *(citing United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 730-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993)). If these factors are established, the decision to correct the forfeited error is within the sound discretion *383of the court, and the court mil not exercise that discretion unless the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *Olano,*507 U.S. at 735-736, 113 S.Ct. 1770.

The record is ambiguous as to whether the district court neglected to consider the factors outlined in U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b) or whether the district court determined that DeSalme was not entitled to this reduction without giving reasons for this conclusion. The record also does not conclusively establish that DeSalme was entitled to a reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b)(l) or (2). Accordingly, there is no clear or obvious error in connection with the district court’s refusal to grant DeSalme a one-level reduction -under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 99-2209

SCOTT W. VEALE; DAVID T. VEALE,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Selya, Circuit Judge,

Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Boudin, Circuit Judge.

Scott W. Veale and David T. Veale on brief pro se.

Philip T. McLaughlin, Attorney General, and Daniel J.

Mullen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, on brief for State

defendants.

David P. Slawsky and Upton, Sanders & Smith on brief for the

Marlborough defendants.

Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and T. David

Plourde, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for Federal

defendants.
-2-

October 5, 2000

Per Curiam. The district court dismissed the

amended complaint of appellants Scott W. Veale and David T.

Veale, and appellants appealed. After carefully reviewing

the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm this judgment

for essentially the reasons stated in the district court's

Order, dated September 1, 1999. We add only that there was

no error in the district court's denial of appellants'

motion for a change of venue.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
---

## Jim Scotti

Jim Scotti

He has discovered numerous asteroids, particularly near-Earth asteroids, and has also recovered more than 60 comets starting in 1985 (since comets are subject to non-gravitational forces due to outgassing and solar wind, it is often a challenge to predict their exact position and rediscover them each time they make a new perihelion approach). He confirmed the discovery of the well known Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, which impacted Jupiter in July 1994. He also discovered the periodic comets P/2000 Y3 Scotti and P/2001 X2 Scotti, which are not yet numbered as they have only been seen at one perihelion.

His research interests include the origin of comets, the dynamical evolution of comets and asteroids, the Near-Earth Asteroids, and the outer solar system.

The asteroid 3594 Scotti is named for him.

He is also an accomplished photographer and painter.  The painting below depicts the launch of Apollo 17 from the Moon's surface.



April 2006
EXHIBIT (32)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best knowledge of the undersigned:








(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial


condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  December 16, 2010

/s/ Tony W. WolfeTony W. WolfeChief Executive OfficerDated:  December 16, 2010

/s/ A. Joseph LampronA. Joseph LampronChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
               (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 13, 2003


                                               BY:   /s/  Paul S. Shipman
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Paul S. Shipman
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer