67620 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule 

involves establishing, disestablishing, or 

changing Regulated Navigation Areas 

and security or safety zones. An 

environmental analysis checklist and a 

categorical exclusion determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T11–368 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T11–368 Safety zone; Richardson 

Ash Scattering by Fireworks, San 

Francisco, CA 

(a) Location. This temporary safety 

zone is established for the waters of San 

Francisco Bay 1500 feet off Yellow 

Bluff, Sausalito, CA. The fireworks 

launch site will be located in position 

37°50′9′′ N, 122°27′59′′ W (NAD 83). 

From 3:30 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. on 

November 6, 2010, the temporary safety 

zone applies to the navigable waters 

around the fireworks site within a 

radius of 100 feet. From 6:15 p.m. until 

7 p.m. on November 6, 2010, the area to 

which the temporary safety zone applies 

will increase in size to encompass the 

navigable waters around the fireworks 

site within a radius of 400 feet. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section, ‘‘designated representative’’ 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal, 

State, or local officer designated by or 

assisting the Captain of the Port San 

Francisco (COTP) in the enforcement of 

the safety zone. 

(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

regulations in § 165.23 of this title, entry 

into, transiting, or anchoring within this 

safety zone is prohibited unless 

authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s 

designated representative. 

(2) The safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the COTP or a designated 

representative. 

(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone must 

contact the COTP or a designated 

representative to obtain permission to 

do so. Vessel operators given permission 

to enter or operate in the safety zone 

must comply with all directions given to 

them by the COTP or the designated 

representative. Persons and vessels may 

request permission to enter the safety 

zone on VHF–16 or through the 24-hour 

Command Center at telephone 415–399– 

3547. 

(d) Effective period. This section is 

effective from 3:30 p.m. through 7 p.m. 

on November 6, 2010. 

Dated: October 22, 2010. 

C.L. Stowe, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27703 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0721] 

RIN 1625–AA87 

Temporary Security Zones; San 

Francisco Bay, Delta Ports, Monterey 

Bay and Humboldt Bay, CA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing temporary security zones 

on the navigable waters of San 

Francisco Bay, Delta Ports, Monterey 

Bay and Humboldt Bay, CA, in support 

of increasing the size of security zones 

currently provided by 33 CFR 165.1183 

from 100 yards to 500 yards. These 

temporary security zones are necessary 

to effectively protect cruise ships, high 

interest vessels (HIVs), or tankers, as 

defined under 33 CFR 165.1183. Persons 

and vessels are prohibited from entering 

into, transiting through, or anchoring 

within the temporary security zones 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port or her designated representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR 

from November 3, 2010 through April 

15, 2011. This rule is effective with 

actual notice for purposes of 

enforcement from October 5, 2010, 

through April 15, 2011. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 67621 

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this 

preamble as being available in the 

docket are part of docket USCG–2010– 

0721 and are available online by going 

to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting 

USCG–2010–0721 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They 

are also available for inspection or 

copying at the Docket Management 

Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

rule, call or e-mail Ensign Liezl 

Nicholas, Waterways Management, U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, Coast 

Guard; telephone 415–399–7443, e-mail 

D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing the docket, 

call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary final rule without prior 

notice and opportunity to comment 

pursuant to authority under section 4(a) 

of the Administrative Procedure Act 

(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

at this time with respect to this 

temporary rule because it was contrary 

to the public interest to wait. The COTP 

has deemed this temporary rule as 

necessary because it allows the Coast 

Guard to better protect HIVs. As noted 

in the Discussion of the Rule section 

below, the Coast Guard has initiated a 

separate, notice-and-comment 

rulemaking while this temporary rule is 

in effect. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. It would be contrary to the 

public interest not to publish this rule, 

as it is necessary to put the Coast Guard 

in better position to afford protection to 

HIVs. 

Basis and Purpose 

Based on experience with actual 

security zone enforcement operations, 

observations during boat tactics 

training, and discussions with Coast 

Guard experts, Sector San Francisco has 

concluded that the current 100-yard 

security zones are not large enough to 

sufficiently protect cruise ships, HIVs, 

or tankers from sabotage, other 

subversive acts, criminal actions or 

other causes of a similar nature. The 

increase of the security zones to 500 

yards would allow reaction time to a 

vessel closing in at 20 knots to increase 

from 9 seconds (for 100 yards) to 36 

seconds (for 500 yards). In addition, 500 

yards would establish a consistent 

standard for all escort operations in the 

San Francisco Bay area that would 

benefit tactical coxswains and minimize 

the potential for confusion on the part 

of the boating public. 

Discussion of Rule 

This rule establishes temporary 

security zones that will be enforced 

from October 5, 2010, through April 5, 

2011. This rule also temporarily 

suspends 33 CFR 165.1183. The Coast 

Guard has initiated a separate 

rulemaking that proposes to revise 

§ 165.1183 so that it contains security 

zones the same size as the zones 

established by this temporary final rule. 

The Coast Guard expects to complete 

that separate notice-and-comment 

rulemaking during the effective period 

of this temporary final rule. To 

comment on that rulemaking [Docket 

No. USCG–2010–1004] for a permanent 

revision of § 165.1183, please find our 

notice of proposed rulemaking entitled, 

‘‘Security Zone; Increase of Security 

Zones under 33 CFR 165.1183 from 100 

to 500 yards; San Francisco Bay, Delta 

Ports, Monterey Bay, and Humboldt 

Bay, CA,’’ published elsewhere in 

today’s issue of the Federal Register. 

The limits of these temporary security 

zones include all waters in San 

Francisco Bay, extending from the 

surface to the sea floor, within 500 yards 

ahead, astern and extending 500 yards 

along either side of any cruise ship, 

tanker or HIV that is underway, 

anchored, or moored within the San 

Francisco Bay and Delta port areas 

shoreward of the line drawn between 

San Francisco Main Ship Channel 

Buoys 7 and 8 (LLNR 4190 and 4195, 

positions 37°46.9′ N, 122°35.4′ W and 

37°46.5′ N, 122°35.2′ W, respectively). 

In Monterey Bay, the limits of the 

security zones include all waters, 

extending from the surface to the sea 

floor, within 500 yards ahead, astern 

and extending 500 yards along either 

side of any cruise ship, tanker or HIV 

that is underway, anchored or moored 

within the Monterey Bay area 

shoreward of a line drawn between 

Santa Cruz Light (LLNR 305) to the 

north in position 36°57.10′ N, 

122°01.60′ W, and Cypress Point, 

Monterey to the south, in position 

36°34.90′ N, 121°58.70′ W. 

In Humboldt Bay the limits of these 

temporary security zones apply to all 

waters, extending from the surface to 

the sea floor, within 500 yards ahead, 

astern and extending 500 yards along 

either side of any cruise ship, tanker or 

HIV that is underway, anchored, or 

moored within Humboldt Bay area 

shoreward of a 4 nautical mile radius 

line drawn to the west of the Humboldt 

Bay Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy HB 

(LLNR 8230), in position 40°46.25′ N, 

124°16.13′ W. 

The temporary security zones are 

necessary to effectively protect cruise 

ships, high interest vessels (HIV), and 

tankers as defined under 33 CFR 

165.1183 from sabotage or other 

subversive acts, criminal actions, or 

other causes of a similar nature. Persons 

and vessels will be prohibited from 

entering into, transiting through, or 

anchoring within the temporary safety 

zones unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port, or her designated 

representative. 

The temporary security zones will be 

enforced by Coast Guard patrol craft and 

San Francisco Harbor Police as 

authorized by the Captain of the Port. 

See 33 CFR 6.04–11, Assistance of other 

agencies. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). We expect the economic impact 

of this rule to be so minimal that full 

Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. 

Most of the entities likely to be affected 

are pleasure craft engaged in 

recreational activities and sightseeing. 

In addition, due to National Security 

interests, the implementation of these 

temporary security zones is necessary 

for the protection of the United States 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
67622 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

and its people. The size of the zones is 

the minimum necessary to provide 

adequate protection for cruise ships, 

HIVs, and tankers as defined under 33 

CFR 165.1183 assets. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

entities, some of which may be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit or anchor in 

a portion of the San Francisco Bay, 

Delta Ports, Monterey Bay and 

Humboldt Bay from October 5, 2010 

through April 5, 2011. 

The security zones will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons. Vessel traffic can 

pass safely around the zone. Before the 

effective period, the Coast Guard will 

issue local notice to mariners (LNM) 

and broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) 

alerts via VHF–FM marine channel 16 

before the security zone is enforced. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we offer to assist small entities in 

understanding the rule so that they can 

better evaluate its effects on them and 

participate in the rulemaking process. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 

1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for 

Federalism under Executive Order 

13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial 

direct effect on State or local 

governments and would either preempt 

State law or impose a substantial direct 

cost of compliance on them. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for Federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this rule will not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule 

involves the establishment of a security 

zone. 

An environmental analysis checklist 

and a categorical exclusion 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 67623 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. From November 3, 2010, through 

April 5, 2011, temporarily suspend 

§ 165.1183 and temporarily add 

§ 165.T11–362 to read as follows: 

§ 165.T11–362 Temporary Security Zones; 

San Francisco Bay, Delta Ports, Monterey 

Bay and Humboldt Bay, CA. 

(a) Location. (1) San Francisco Bay. 

The limits of these security zones 

include all waters in San Francisco Bay, 

extending from the surface to the sea 

floor, within 500 yards ahead, astern 

and extending 500 yards along either 

side of any cruise ship, tanker or HIV 

that is underway, anchored, or moored 

within the San Francisco Bay and Delta 

port areas shoreward of the line drawn 

between San Francisco Main Ship 

Channel Buoys 7 and 8 (LLNR 4190 and 

4195, positions 37°46.9′ N, 122°35.4′ W 

and 37°46.5′ N, 122°35.2′ W, 

respectively). 

(2) Monterey Bay. In Monterey Bay, 

the limits of the security zones include 

all waters, extending from the surface to 

the sea floor, within 500 yards ahead, 

astern and extending 500 yards along 

either side of any cruise ship, tanker or 

HIV that is underway, anchored or 

moored within Monterey Bay area 

shoreward of a line drawn between 

Santa Cruz Light (LLNR 305) to the 

north in position 36°57.10′ N, 

122°01.60′ W and Cypress Point, 

Monterey to the south in position 

36°34.90′ N, 121°58.70′ W. 

(3) Humboldt Bay. In Humboldt Bay 

the limits of the security zones apply to 

all waters, extending from the surface to 

the sea floor, within 500 yards ahead, 

astern and extending 500 yards along 

either side of any cruise ship, tanker or 

HIV that is underway, anchored, or 

moored within Humboldt Bay area 

shoreward of a 4 nautical mile radius 

line drawn to the west of the Humboldt 

Bay Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy HB 

(LLNR 8230), in position 40°46.25′ N, 

124°16.13′ W. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section— 

Cruise ship means any vessel over 100 

gross register tons, carrying more than 

12 passengers for hire which makes 

voyages lasting more than 24 hours, of 

which any part is on the high seas. 

Passengers from cruise ships are 

embarked or disembarked in the U.S. or 

its territories. Cruise ships do not 

include ferries that hold Coast Guard 

Certificates of Inspection endorsed for 

‘‘Lakes, Bays and Sounds’’ that transit 

international waters for only short 

periods of time on frequent schedules. 

Designated representative means any 

commissioned, warrant, and petty 

officers of the Coast Guard on board 

Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, 

and local, State and Federal law 

enforcement vessels who have been 

authorized to act on the behalf of the 

Captain of the Port. 

High Interest Vessel or HIV means any 

vessel deemed by the Captain of the 

Port, or higher authority, as a vessel 

requiring protection based upon risk 

assessment analysis of the vessel and is 

therefore escorted by a Coast Guard or 

other law enforcement vessel with an 

embarked Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer. 

Tanker means any self-propelled tank 

vessel constructed or adapted primarily 

to carry oil or hazardous materials in 

bulk in the cargo spaces. 

(c) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from October 5, 2010, 

through April 5, 2011. If the need to 

enforce the security zones in paragraph 

(a) of this section terminates before this 

rule expires, the Captain of the Port will 

cease enforcement of the security zones 

and will announce that fact via 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit 

through or anchoring within the 

security zones described in paragraph 

(a) of this section is prohibited unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port of 

San Francisco or her designated 

representative. 

(2) Mariners requesting permission to 

transit through the security zone may 

request authorization to do so from the 

Patrol Commander (PATCOM), a 

designated representative. The 

PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM 

Channel 16. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the 

designated representative. 

(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast 

Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted 

by other Federal, State, or local 

agencies. 

Dated: October 4, 2010. 

C.L. Stowe, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27704 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0665; FRL–9212–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; 

Volatile Organic Compound SiteSpecific State Implementation Plan for 

Abbott Laboratories 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving into the 

Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

amendments to Illinois’ manufacturing 

rules. On July 17, 2009, the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(Illinois EPA) submitted amendments to 

its pharmaceutical manufacturing rules 

for approval into its SIP. These 

amendments consist of a site-specific 

rulemaking for certain of Abbott 

Laboratories’ (Abbott) tunnel dryers and 

fluid bed dryers. This site-specific rule 

revision is approvable because it lowers 

the allowable emissions from these 

dryers and it is consistent with the 

Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA 

regulations. EPA proposed these rules 

for approval on July 14, 2010, and 

received no comments. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

December 3, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Nos. EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0665. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation 

Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES