alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ferril Vincent *v.*The Commonwealth.

Bail Bond —■ Forfeiture —■ Defense.

The fact that the defendant was prevented by military power, against his will, from appearing before the adjudged forfeiture, presents a good defense and it was error to sustain a demurrer to the answer.

APPEAL FROM FULTON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 11, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Bobertson:

Construed fairly — the answer *prima facie*imparts that the principal in the recognizance was not delinquent at the *term*at which he was recognized to appear but during that term was forced by military power against his will from Kentucky into the Confederate lines, and in like manner was prevented from appearing or being surrendered by the appellant as his bail before the adjudged forfeiture. And thus interpreted, the answer presents a good defense to scire facias and the Circuit Court erred in sustaining the demurrer and adjudging the penalty against the appellant.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer. ■
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE GEORGE MILAM HALL, doing 

business as The Alamo, 

 Debtor. 

__________________________________ 

GEORGE MILAM HALL, 

 Appellant, 

 v. 

ERIC C. RAJALA, Trustee, DAVID R. 

KLAASSEN, and GREAT SOUTHERN 

BANK, 

 Appellees. 

BAP No. KS-10-027 

Bankr. No. 06-40872 

Chapter 12 

ORDER TRANSFERRING 

APPEAL 

TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

May 25, 2010 

————————————————— 

 The matter before the Court is the Election (“Election”) filed by David R. 

Klaassen (“Appellee”). In the Election, Appellee has timely filed an objection to the 

disposition of this matter by this Court. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(1) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(e), it is HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

(1) This appeal is transferred to the United States District Court. 

BAP Appeal No. 10-27 Docket No. 16 Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 1 of 2
(2) Any deadlines, notices of deficiency, or orders to show cause 

previously set by this Court are VACATED. 

(3) This Court’s record is transmitted to the United States Bankruptcy 

Court. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-27 Docket No. 16 Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 2 of 2
Mission Name Launch Date Deployment 

Status

Rocket Mission Description Payload(s) Organization(s) Orbit

CIRiS (Compact 

Infrared 

Radiometer in 

Space)

12/5/19 02/01/2020 

SEOPS-2 

deployer on 

Cygnus CRS12

Falcon 9 A 6U technology demonstration mission 

for improved on-orbit radiometric 

calibration that uses an imaging 

instrument designed to operate on a 

Cubesat. This project was sefunded under 

the InVEST (In-Space Validation of Earth 

Science Technologies) program. 

Thermal infrared radiometric 

imaging instrument

Ball Aerospace 400 km × 

400 km, 

51.6°

EdgeCube 12/5/19 02/01/2020 

SEOPS-2 

deployer on 

Cygnus CRS12

Falcon 9 An Earth-observing mission using 3P 

PocketQube to monitor changes in the 

Earth’s terrestrial ecosystems due to 

anthropogenic and natural drivers. 

Specifically, it will measure change in the 

red edge of the leaf's reflection in 

vegetation chlorophyll absorption and 

mesophyll scattering due to seasonal leaf 

stress. The payload consists of six pairs of 

photo-sensors and filters that are pointed 

normal to the spin axis to scan the Earth. 

Six pairs of photo-sensors and 

filters

Sonoma State 

University, 

Santa Clara 

University and 

Morehead State 

University

400 km × 

400 km, 

51.6°

TES-10 2/14/20 7/13/20 NG-13-Antares A 6U mission will function as a high 

temperature, accurate deorbit reentry 

nanosatellite. 

Testing exo-brake, 

communication devices, and 

radiation tolerant electronics

NASA ARC, San 

Jose State 

University and 

University of 

LEO

ANDESITE 6/13/20 6/13/2020 

5:12:00 GMT

Electron This project will deploy eight free-flying 

sub-satellites from a 6U spacecraft to make 

multipoint magnetic field measurements 

in low Earth orbit. The goal of the mission 

is to study dynamics in magnetosphereionosphere coupling to allow for better 

modeling of its effects. 

Magnetometers Boston 

University 

Center for Space 

Physics, TriSept 

Corporation, 

NASA

500 km x 

500 km, 

51.6°

CubeSat Launch Initiative ELaNa 28, 30 and 32
N0

..**1~80** STATE OFTEXAS § IN THE DISTJUCT COURT vs.

# ~ . 29'h .JUDICIAL DISTRICT JOHN MICHAEL RAY MARSH § § PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OFSAID COURT: NOW COMES, JOHN MICHAEL RAY MARSH, Defendant in the above-styled and numbered cause, and gives this written notice ofappeal to the CourtofAppeals ofthe State ofTexas from the judgment of conviction and sentence herein rendered against JOHN MICHAEL RAY MARSH, aparty to this proceeding who seeks to alter the trial court'sjudgmentor other appealable order. This is an appeal in Motion to Proceed with an Adjudication ofGuilt case as defined under Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2), and Defendant is appealing only those matters that were raised by a Written motion filed and ruled on before trial. Tex. R. App. P.25.2(a)(2)(A). 

# FILED AT 12.".QQ**~**

NOTICE OF APPEAL Pagel Respectfully submitted, CANNON LAW FIRM 215 Old Annetta Road Aledo, Texas 76008 Tel: (81 7) 441-4114 Fax: (817) 441-1650CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on the

# J.f_ day ofJuly, 2017, a true and correct copy of

# th~ above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Palo Pinto County, 520 Oak Street, Palo Pinto, Texas 76484, via hand delivery.

NOTICE OF' APPEAL Page 2
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1674

For the relief of Adam Paluch. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2003

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Adam Paluch.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ADAM 

4 PALUCH. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Adam Paluch shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 
2

•S 1674 IS 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Adam Paluch en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), Adam Paluch shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for ad5 justment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 

6 and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of 

7 this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Adam Paluch, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences,
Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the "Form 10-Q") upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma
Sciences, Inc.

|                         |                                                                                                                | 
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: November 13, 2009 | /s/ Edward J. Quilty                                                                                           | 
|                         | Edward J. Quilty
        Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before January 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Audrey L. Farley, SES Candidate, Office of Financial 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 8th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey L. Farley, Office of Financial 
Assistance, 202-205-7006, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8aebffeef8eff3a4ecebf8e6eff3caf9e8eba4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4d59485e4955024a4d5e4049556c5f4e4d024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>; Curtis B. Rich, 
Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aecddbdcdac7dd80dcc7cdc6eeddcccf80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690a1c1b1d001a471b000a01291a0b08470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected through these 
forms from future Intermediary lenders will be used to determine 
eligibility and to properly evaluate the merits of each application for 
a direct loan. In addition, the information will be collected for the 
purpose of providing direct loan funds under the Intermediary Lending 
Pilot Program (ILPP) to eligible Intermediaries, which in turn will be 
used to provide loans to start-up, newly established, and growing small 
business concerns for working capital, real estate, or the acquisition 
of materials, supplies or equipment.
    Title: ``Intermediary Lending Pilot Program (ILPP).''
    Description of Respondents: Private, Non-Profit Organizations or 
Community Development Corporations; and an Agency or Non-Profit entity 
established by a Native American Tribal Government.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 200.
    Annual Burden: 3,200.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2010-27730 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

October 29, 2021

General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Space
Policy Institute/George Washington University Dinner on November 2, 2021

On November 2, 2021, the Space Policy Institute (SPI) of George Washington University’s
(GWU) together with Limitless Space Institute (LSI), both organizations are a not-for-
profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold
a dinner at the DACOR Bacon House in Washington, DC, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. SPI
and LSI jointly are in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this
event. The guest speaker at the event will be Harold “Sonny” White, Director of Advanced
Research and Development, Limitless Space Institute.

Approximately 40 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity
of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of
the legislative branch, state and local government officials, representatives from academia,
industry, and foreign entities. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and
beverages, is approximately $96 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA
attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event

meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. §
2635.204(g)(2).

1 further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees —
including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role in a matter
affecting the interests of SPI or GWU may accept an invitation for free attendance to the
event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs
any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the
performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or


negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement — LSI does have a Space Act
Agreement with NASA - should seek a separate determination from their local ethics
counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to exercise
any COVID-19 precautions,appropriate to their individual situation.

Zk

Adam F. Greenstone
#### J. S. Freer *v.*K. S. Chandler.

Will — .Construction — Intention of Testator.

The intention of the testator, when clearly and distinctively announced, will not be disturbed, however singular, when -it contravenes no public policy nor principle of law.

The executor may convey a legal title to testator’s land after it has reverted to the estate, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the will.

APPEAL EROM ETON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 8, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court bv

Judge Williams:

We concur with the Circuit Court that the deed from Aug. L.1 Chandler to his brother, Josiah Chandler, was absolute and not an error, that he was of full age when he made it, and that it hád never been rescinded. :

'• But, we think, an erroneous construction was placed on Josiah Chandler’s will. He evidently intended to dispose of all his estate and to die intestate as to none; the devise was of all his land and personalty to- his wife for life or widowhood charged with the-payment of his debts; he made his wife executrix so long as she1 lived-and1 remained a widow; then he desired Tramwell Parker to *302execute this will *“ to put the remainder of my property around me and mine ”*

The testator had lost all of his children, and evidently after providing for his surviving relict during her life or widowhood, his next object was to have the last resting place of himself and descendants adorned; and, however singular the devise or form of its expression, we cannot doubt but this was his object and the only reasonable construction to be given to those words that dispose of the reversionary interest after the estate devised to his wife. Such a devise is legal, however singular, and we cannot frustrate the intention of the testator so clearly and distinctly announced, as it contravenes no public policy nor principle of common nor statute law known to us.

The deed of Parker who qualified as an executor, after the death of the testator’s widow to Freer, conveyed to him the legal title to the land.

"Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions to dismiss appellee’s bill absolutely.
#### Coles v. Raymond and Another.—In chancery.

*Saturday, November*28.

TWO witnesses, or one witness with corroborating circumstances, are necessary to sustain a bill in chancery against the express denial of the answer. R. S. 1838, p. 439.—*Green et al.*v. *Vardiman et al.*2 Blackf. 324.
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO





18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005








I, Iuriy
Vladimirovich Shevchenko, Chief Financial Officer of Promotora Valle
Hermoso, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
amended Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Iuriy
      Vladimirovich ShevchenkoIuriy
      Vladimirovich ShevchenkoChief
      Financial OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      3,015,623
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      2,574,002
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              942,326
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                26,423,289
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     19,901,360
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       20,218,674
<LOANS>                                   121,318,077
<ALLOWANCE>                                 1,037,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            178,455,999
<DEPOSITS>                                145,462,309
<SHORT-TERM>                                6,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         3,118,592
<LONG-TERM>                                 5,646,053
<COMMON>                                    4,759,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 12,969,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            178,455,999
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             2,508,285
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             770,909
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               47,243
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            3,326,437
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          1,830,751
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,009,813
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       1,316,624
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  68,299
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (200,110)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               913,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               266,831
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    266,831
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  164,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .15    
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.91
<LOANS-NON>                                 1,533,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                  904,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             1,300,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              972,859
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           1,037,813
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          285,669
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       752,144
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1960

To exempt airports in economically depressed communities from matching 

grant obligations under the Airport Improvement Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 25, 2003

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To exempt airports in economically depressed communities 

from matching grant obligations under the Airport Improvement Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

4 SHARE OF AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PRO5 GRAM PROJECT COSTS. 

6 Section 47109 of title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection 

9 (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (b) and (d)’’; and 
2

•S 1960 IS 

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR ECONOMICALLY DE4 PRESSED COMMUNITIES.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The United States Govern6 ment’s share of allowable project costs is 100 per7 cent for a project at an airport that is located in a 

8 community that, at the time a project grant applica9 tion is submitted under section 47105 of this title, 

10 is an economically depressed community. 

11 ‘‘(2) ECONOMICALLY DEPRESSED COMMUNITY

12 DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, a commu13 nity is an economically depressed community if it 

14 has—

15 ‘‘(A) an unemployment rate that is, for the 

16 most recent 24-month period for which data are 

17 available, at least 1 percent greater than the 

18 national average unemployment rate; 

19 ‘‘(B) per capita income that is, for the 

20 most recent period for which data are available, 

21 80 percent or less of the national average per 

22 capita income; or 

23 ‘‘(C) a special need, as determined by the 

24 Secretary of Transportation, arising from ac25 tual or threatened severe unemployment or eco-
3

•S 1960 IS 

1 nomic adjustment problems resulting from se2 vere short-term or long-term changes in eco3 nomic conditions such as—

4 ‘‘(i) substantial outmigration or popu5 lation loss; 

6 ‘‘(ii) underemployment; 

7 ‘‘(iii) military base closures or realign8 ments, defense contractor reductions-in9 force, or Department of Energy defense-re10 lated funding reductions; 

11 ‘‘(iv) natural or other major disasters 

12 or emergencies; 

13 ‘‘(v) extraordinary depletion of nat14 ural resources; 

15 ‘‘(vi) closure or restructuring of in16 dustrial firms essential to area economies; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(vii) destructive impacts of foreign 

19 trade.’’.

Æ