alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Robotics Alliance Project

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators, Students

## Education Opportunity

Contests and Challenges, Events, In Person

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8, Grades 9-12

## Subject

Engineering Design

The Robotics Alliance Project actively supports national robotics competitions: Best Robotics, Botball Robotics, and the FIRST Robotics Competition. These competitions are available nationwide for teams of professionals and young people to solve an engineering design problem in an intense and competitive way.  The Robotics Alliance Project also maintains a clearinghouse of robotics-related educational materials.

 Visit the website to learn more about the competitions, starting a team and event schedules.

**Robotics Alliance Project**
# Sometimes Getting the Perfect Picture Really Is Rocket Science

NASA Engineer Cindy Fuentes Rosal waves goodbye to a Black Brant IX sounding rocket launching from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia during the total solar eclipse on April 8, 2024. The rocket was part of a series of three launches for the Atmospheric Perturbations around Eclipse Path (APEP) mission to study the disturbances in the electrified region of Earth’s atmosphere known as the ionosphere created when the Moon eclipses the Sun. The rockets launched before, during, and after peak local eclipse time on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/20240408-wallopsapepmission-cpirner-1x1/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 8, 2024Image CreditNASA/Chris PirnerSize3000x3000pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 15, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Jamie Adkins								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1827

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that 
  processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order 
                          applicable to pears.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2003

   Mr. Smith (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Cantwell, and Mr. Wyden) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that 
  processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order 
                          applicable to pears.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PEAR MARKETING ORDERS.

    Section 8c(7)(C) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 
608c(7)(C)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, is amended in the last sentence--
            (1) by striking ``or pears''; and
            (2) by striking ``: Provided,'' and all that follows 
        through ``be equal''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LESTER EVANS.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10813 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. TRESHUN DEVONTE BATES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:19

- CR

- 24

- 1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Treshun Devonte Bates appeals his 71

- month, within

- guidelines sentence for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. Bates contends that the district court’s application of the enhance d base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 (a)(4)(A) was erroneous b ecause his Texas conviction for assault of a public servant does not qualify as a crime of violence, given that the statute of conviction criminalizes reckless conduct and therefore lacks force

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 18, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10813 Document: 00515349855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/18/2020No. 19

- 10813

2 as an element

. The Government moves for summary affirmance, a rguing that Bates ’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Rocha Flores , 921 F.3d 1133 (5th Cir. 2019). Bates correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed, and he raises it only to preserve the issue for future review. See Rocha Flores , 921 F.3 d at 1133 ; see also United States v. Reyes

- Contreras , 910 F.3d 169, 183 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc) ( considering former U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) and recognizing that the use

- of

- force requirement may include knowing or reckless conduct ) ; United States v. Moore , 635 F.3d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 2011) ( interpreting g uidelines provisions and statutes with similar language interchangeably ) . The Government is “c learly right as a matter of law” such that “there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED , and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 19-10813 Document: 00515349855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/18/2020
20020862.20090455/2282086.1 No

. 14

- 15

- 00695

- CV

In The Fourteenth Court Of Appeals Houston, Texas

GARDEN RIDGE, L.P., Appellant

V.

CLEAR LAKE CENTER, L.P. , Appellee

From the 215 th District Court, Harris County, Texas Cause No. 2009

- 58038, consolidated with Cause No. 2012

- 46 099

Appellee /Cross

- Appellant’s Unopposed Motion f or Extension o f Time t o File Brief

Appellee /Cross

- Appellant Clear Lake Center, L.P. ( “ Appellee /Cross

Appellant ” ) file s this m otion for e xtension of t ime to f ile its Appellee ’ s brief and

its Cross- Appellant ’s b rief pur suant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)

and 38.6 (d).
Appellee /Cross

- Appellant ’s Brief is was due on December 2 , 2015

. This is

the second request for extensi on

. This motion is not brought for purpose of delay, rather that justice may be

done. ACCEPTED 14-15-00695-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/9/2015 4:27:27 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK ACCEPTED 14-15-00695-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/9/2015 4:27:27 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK20020862.20090455/2282086.1 2 Appellee /Cross

- Appellant requests a 1 5 da y extension to file
Appellee /Cross

- Appellant ’s Brief

. R eason s for this extension include the
following:

a. W hile preparing the briefs, omissions of materials from the

Reporter ’ s Record were discovered

. Not w ithstanding the

Reporter ’ s p rompt and gracious assistance, time was lost.
Appellee /Cross

- Appellant respectfully asks the Court to extend the time for
filing Appellee /Cross

- Appellant ’s brief for an additional 1 5 days or such o ther
period as the Court may determine.
Respectfully submitted,

HIRSCH & WESTHEIMER, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael D. Conner Eric Lipper State Bar No. 12399000 elipper@hirschwest.com Michael D. Conner State Bar No. 0 4688650 mconner@hirschwest.com 1415 Louisiana, 36 th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713

- 223

- 5181 Facsimile: 713

- 223

- 9319
Attorneys f or Appellee/Cross

- Appellant Clear Lake Center, L.P.20020862.20090455/2282086.1 3 Certificate o f Co mpliance
I do hereby certify that this document complies with the typeface requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2013 in 14 point Times New Roman font

.
/s/ Michael D. Conner Michael D. Conner

Certificate o f Conference a nd Certificate o f Service

On December 9, 2015 , I e

- mailed Heidi Bloch , attorney representing Appellant

. S he is not opposed to this Motion.
I hereby certify that on thi s 9 th day of December , 20 15 , a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served as follows:
Stephen W. Lemmon Heidi Bloch Husch Blackwell LLP 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 Austin, Texas 78701 Phone: 512.472.5456

Fax: 512.479.1101 Stephen.Lemm on@huschblackwell.com heidi.bloch@huschblackwell.com Via E

- Service

/s/ Michael D. Conner Michael D. Conner
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Minimum Space Launch System (SLS) Flight Rate 

2014-02-03 (HEOC-01) 

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that NASA conduct a trade study to determine a minimum launch rate 

for SLS with respect to cost, safety, mission success and performance. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

Current Agency plans for SLS show a flight rate of one mission every other year, while 

preliminary mission planning for future exploration missions shows that a much higher launch 

rate may be necessary for mission success. The experience of many members of the Council 

would suggest that the currently planned launch rate is less than optimal for maintenance of the 

supplier base, and the ability of the engineering, production, launch and operations teams to 

make appropriate risk decisions in a timely fashion. 

Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 

Increased likelihood that SLS will be unable to meet its exploration objectives due to cost, safety 

or mission success issues. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs that there is a need to define the minimum flight rate with respect to cost, safety, 

mission success, and performance. NASA believes that it is important to not only look at this 

with respect to SLS, but also with respect to Orion and Exploration Ground Systems. The entire 

portfolio needs to be operated safely and cost effectively to meet our exploration requirements. 

To this end, Exploration Systems Development in the NASA Human Exploration and Operations 

Mission Directorate is initiating a study to determine the minimum flight rate. Due to the 

complexity of this study, we believe it will take some time to accomplish and we will report 

progress at subsequent Human Exploration and Operations Committee meetings of the NASA 

Advisory Council until complete. 

Enclosure 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(BB)


             AMENDED EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL PLANNING SERVICES PLAN 2000

      This nonqualified Plan allows Section 16 Executive Officers of the
Corporation to receive reimbursement for payment of fees to attorney,
accountant, or financial planning service for tax or estate planning services.
Reimbursements are limited to $12,000 annually, grossed up for applicable taxes,
and are paid as Special Pay taxable to Executive. The Executive is responsible
for payment to the provider of services. Payments under this Plan are expensed
as compensation to the Executive when reimbursed and charged to their respective
cost center.

      The listing below includes Executives eligible for Plan for the current
plan year.

                          SECTION 16 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

<TABLE>
       <S>           <C>                   <C>
       Rawlins, Jr.  Benjamin W.           Chairman & CEO -- Corporation
       Moore         Jackson W.            President & COO -- Corporation
       DeVaux        Lloyd B.              Executive Vice President
       Parker        John W.               Executive Vice President
       Russell       Michael B.            Executive Vice President
       Walters       Milt K.               Senior Vice President
</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 173

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 

the Superfund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 15, 2003

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. 

BIDEN, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the financing of the Superfund.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Clean-up Pol5 luter Pays Renewal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUPERFUND TAXES. 

7 (a) EXCISE TAXES.—Section 4611(e) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE

10 SUPERFUND FINANCING RATE.—The Hazardous Sub-
2

•S 173 IS 

1 stance Superfund financing rate under this section shall 

2 apply after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 

3 1996, and after the date of the enactment of this sub4 section and before January 1, 2014.’’. 

5 (b) CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL INCOME TAX.—

6 Section 59A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF TAX.—The tax imposed by this 

9 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after De10 cember 31, 1986, and before January 1, 1996, and to tax11 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

12 this subsection and before January 1, 2014.’’. 

13 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

14 (1) Section 4611(b) of the Internal Revenue 

15 Code of 1986 is amended—

16 (A) by striking ‘‘or exported from’’ in 

17 paragraph (1)(A), 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘or exportation’’ in para19 graph (1)(B), and 

20 (C) by striking ‘‘AND EXPORTATION’’ in 

21 the heading. 

22 (2) Section 4611(d)(3) of such Code is amend23 ed—
3

•S 173 IS 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or exporting the crude oil, 

2 as the case may be’’ in the text and inserting 

3 ‘‘the crude oil’’, and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘OR EXPORTS’’ in the 

5 heading. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

7 (1) EXCISE TAXES.—The amendments made by 

8 subsections (a) and (c) shall take effect on the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (2) INCOME TAX.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (b) shall apply to taxable years beginning 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
AGENDA

 

 NASA Advisory Council Ad Hoc Task Force on

 Science, Technology, Engineering

 and Mathematics (STEM) Education

AGENDA

March 13, 2017

9:30 am – 3:00 pm

NASA Headquarters (MIC 3A)

Webex and Call In Information Below

9:30 Open Meeting B. Girten

9:35 Opening Remarks by Chair A. Krishnamurthi

9:45 Leadership Transition D. James

10:00 NASA Education For You B. Girten

10:15 Update on Education BSA and Lean Six Sigma B. Girten

11:00 Break All

11:15 Topics for findings and Recommendations Members 

11:45 Lunch All 

 

12:45 Discuss Findings and Recommendations Members

2:00 Break All

2:15 Finalize Findings and Recommendations Members

 

2:55 Close Meeting B. Girten

844–467–6272 or toll access number 720–259–6462, and then the participant passcode: 329152 followed by the #sign. 

WebEx the link is https://nasa.webex.com/, the meeting number is 991 306 157 and the password isMarch132017!
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Reply to Attn of:

John F. Kennedy Space Center

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

CC

June 6, 2022

TO: All NASA Employees

FROM: CC/Acting Deputy Chief Counsel

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees for the Kennedy 

Space Center Visitor Complex (KSCVC) Gateway: Deep Space Launch 

Complex VIP Reception - June 14, 2022

The DNC Parks & Resorts at KSC, Inc. (DNC) will host the upcoming Gateway: Deep Space 

Launch Complex VIP Reception on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, at the KSCVC. Approximately 

300 people are expected to attend the event, which is open to the public. The guests will 

include representatives of Federal, state, and local government and members of the public. 

The value of the culinary journey is approximately $30 a person. 

 

In accordance with 5 CFR. § 2635.204(g), Gifts of Free Attendance at Widely Attended 

Gatherings, I find this event meets the requirements of a widely attended gathering, and I 

further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend this event 

because their participation will further Agency programs and operations. This event will also 

provide a forum for the attendees to disseminate information on NASA's ongoing activities 

and to discuss matters of interest to NASA with a diverse group of fellow attendees. Because 

of these benefits to NASA, and having considered the factors enumerated in 

5 CFR § 2635.204(g)(4), I also find that the Agency's interest in NASA employees' 

attendance outweighs the concern that such employees may be, or may appear to be, 

improperly influenced in the performance of official duties. 

 

Accordingly, NASA Kennedy Space Center employees whose duties do not substantially 

affect any of the sponsors, including NASA employees in non-career positions who are 

required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may accept an invitation for 

complimentary attendance at this event. NASA employees whose duties may substantially 

affect the sponsor, such as by way of procurement duties or administration of Space Act 

agreements, should seek an individual determination regarding participation in this event 

from the Office of the General Counsel. 

 

 
2

Accordingly, I have determined that NASA invitees may accept their invitations for 

complimentary attendance at this event in accordance with the ethics rules. Attendees are 

reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 CFR. § 2635.204(a), which provides that employees 

may accept gifts valued at no more than $20 per occasion and no more than $50 from one 

source in a calendar year. We understand that DNC will be distributing a Gateway gift bag 

valued at $20.00. 

Alex Vinson 

Agency Designee 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHARLES VINSON

Digitally signed by CHARLES 

VINSON

Date: 2022.06.06 17:37:35 -04'00'
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6240

AUGUSTINE PEREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES C. TURK; JACKSON L. KISER; NORMAN K. MOON; SAMUEL GRAYSON WILSON; GLEN E. CONRAD; J. HARVIE WILKERSON, III; H. EMORY WIDENER, JR.; FRANCIS D. MURNAGHAN, JR.; SAM J. ERVIN, III; WILLIAM WILKINS, JR.; PAUL V. NIEMEYER; CLYDE H. HAMILTON; J. MICHAEL LUTTIG; KAREN J. WILLIAMS; M. BLANE MICHAEL; DIANA GRIBON MOTZ; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR.; JOHN D. BUTZNER; KENNETH K. HALL; JAMES DICKERSON PHILLIPS, JR.; ROBERT B. KING; RUSTY B. FITZGERALD; UNKNOWN LAW CLERKS; UNKNOWN COURT CLERKS; UNKNOWN STAFF ATTORNEYS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-82-6) Submitted: September 14, 2000 Decided: September 26, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Perez v. Turk , No. CA-99-82-6 (W.D. Va. Jan. 12 & Jan. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 23, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD REID,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. 

MR. R. WILEY, Warden Federal Bureau

of Prisons; MR. A. GONZALES, United

States Attorney General; MR. H. WATTS,

General Counsel Federal Bureau of

Prisons,

 Defendants - Appellees.

 ------------------------------ 

JONATHAN LEE RICHES,

 Movant to Intervene - Appellant.

No. 10-1279

(D.C. No.1:07-CV-01855-PAB-KMT)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1279 Document: 01018462650 Date Filed: 07/23/2010 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 2,
1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                           4,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    156,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,441<F1>
<PP&E>                                          94,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,319<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,183
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4> 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,319
<SALES>                                        140,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,104
<CGS>                                          103,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                       550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<FN>
<F1>(OTHER CURRENT ASSETS) 4,553
<F2>(OTHER ASSETS)  1,615
<F3>(LONG TERM DEBT)  41,136
<F4>(DEFERRED INCOME TAXES)  1,588
</FN>
        

</TABLE>