alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,078
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,994
<PP&E>                                          15,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,264
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (28.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (28.03)


</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

NASA’S OFFICE OF STEM ENGAGEMENT UPDATE 

SUPER SEARCH ENGINE WEBSITE UPDATE 

SANDRA MAY Dec. 4, 2018 
UPCOMING OSTEM WEBSITE UPDATES 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Slider to highlight key events 

and/or activities. Can be self-

guided or auto-rotate. 

Slider/scroll (arrows) to 

highlight major content 

areas/groupings. Will need 

to determine maximum 

number to show for each 

(4+) 

Provides users direct access to the 

search tool. The collection of 

educational resources will include 

opportunities (timely events). 

New keyword autocomplete 

functionality (suggested results). 

Drop down menu introduces 

a broad range of topics or 

categories based on 

audience. 
OSTEM WEBSITE SEARCH FEATURES 
OSTEM WEBSITE SEARCH FEATURES CONT’D 
Notional
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CertificationRequired by Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

I, Amy Conley,certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AES Eastern Energy, L.P.(the“registrant”);

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraphomitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosedin this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March16, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Amy Conley                                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Amy Conley  Vice President  (principal financial officer) |   |

 

----
# Sitemap

## April 11, 1991

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1991
- 04
- April 11, 1991

            - STS-37 Shuttle Crew of Atlantis after Edwards Landing
1 ... S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORTWORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 09 4- CV
M ARI A LOPEZ , I ND I VI DU ALL Y, AS NEXT FRI END APPE L L AN TS O F ROD O L FO PE REZ , A M I NO R, AN D A S PERSO N A L REPRESEN TA TI V E O F TH E E S T A T E O FR O D O L F O P E R E Z , D E C E A S E D , SA LETA PEREZ, A N D G U I LL ERM O PEREZ V . N I C K Y BA RRA D / B/A N & S A C O U STI C S, A PPELL EES G R U P O Z O C A L O M A N A G E M E N T , L L C , BOXE R P ROP E RT Y F I NANCI ALM ANAGEM E NT, L L C A /K /A B O X E R P R O P E R T YM A N A G E M E N TC O R P O R A T IO N , T O W N C E N T E R M A L L , L .P ., G R U P O Z O C A L O , L .P ., T OW N C E NT E R P R OP E R T Y, L . L . C. , AN D L GP P ROP E RT Y, L . L . C.

----- -----

FR O M THE 3 42 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRAN T CO UN TY nd

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDUM OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- O n M a y5 , 2 0 0 8 , w e n o ti fi e d a p p e l l a n ts th a t th e tri a l c o u rt c l e rkr esponsi bl e f orpr epar i ng t he r ecor d i n t hi s appeal had i nf or m ed t hi s courtt hat

ar r ang em ent s had notbe en m adet o pa y f ort he cl er k’ s r ec or d a s r equ i r ed by T e x a sR u l e o f A p p e l l a te P ro c e d u re 3 5 .3 (a )(2 ). S ee T EX. R . A PP . P . 3 5 .3 (a )(2 ). W e st at ed t hatw e w oul d di sm is s t he appeal f orw antofpr osecut i on un l ess a p p e l l a n ts , w i th i n fi fte e n d a y s , m a d e a rra n g e m e n ts to p a y fo r th e c l e rk ’sre c o rd
a n d p ro v i d e d th i sc o u rt w i th p ro o f o f p a y m e n t. B e c a u s e a p p e l l a n ts h a v e n o t m a d e p a y m e n t a rra n g e m e n ts fo r th e c l e rk ’s
r ec or d, i ti s t he o p i ni on oft he cou rtt hatt he app ea l s houl d bedi sm i ss ed f or
w a n t o f p ro s e c u ti o n . A c c o rd i n g l y , w e d i s m i s sth e a p p e a l . S eeT EX . R . A PP . P . 3 7 .3 (b ), 4 2 .3 (b ). A ppel l ant s shal l pay al l cost s of t he appeal , f or w hi ch l et execut i on i ssue.

P E R C U R I A M
P A N E LD : H O L M A N , G A R D N E R , a n d W A L K E R , J J . DEL I VERE D: J un e 12, 2008
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1766

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to prohibit the use of certain 

conservation funding to provide technical assistance under the conservation reserve program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. BURNS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to prohibit the 

use of certain conservation funding to provide technical 

assistance under the conservation reserve program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN CONSERVA4 TION FUNDING FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 

5 FOR CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM. 

6 Section 1241(b)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 

7 (16 U.S.C. 3841(b)(1)) is amended by inserting before the 
2

•S 1766 IS 

1 period at the end the following: ‘‘(other than the conserva2 tion reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1)’’.

Æ
May 24 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIMOTHY WAYNE DREW , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00069

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for
observan ce.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, along with the total number of active subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by each as of September 30, 2006. Ownership is 100% unless indicated otherwise.

 

|                                |                                       | U.S.   | Non-U.S. |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|----------|
|                                |                                       |   |
| Caspian Services Group Limited, BVI |                                       | 0      |
|                                |                                       |   |     |
| Caspian Geophysic Ltd. BVI          |                                       | 3      |
|                                | TatArka, LLP, Kazakhstan                   |   |     |
|                                | Kazmorgeophysica CJSC, Kazakhstan(1)       |   |     |
|                                | Veritas Caspian LLP, Kazakhstan(2)         |   |     |
|                                |                                       |   |     |
| Caspian Real Estate Ltd., BVI       |                                       | 3      |
|                                | CJSC Bauta, Kazakhstan(3)                  |   |     |
|                                | Bautino Development Company, Kazakhstan(3) |   |     |
|                                | Balykshi LLP, Kazakhstan                   |   |     |

 

 

(1) Caspian Geophysics Ltd. owns a 51% equity interest in Kazmorgeophyisica CJSC.

(2)  Kazmorgeophysica CJSC owns a 50% equity interest in Veritas Caspian LLP.

(3) Caspian Real Estate Ltd. owns a 56% equity interest in CJSC Bauta and a 50% equity interest in Bautino Development Company LLP.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (MANAGER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


     The undersigned  officer of Crusade Management Limited, a company organized
under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby certifies on behalf
of CML and on his own behalf for  purposes of the Crusade  Global Trust No. 2 of
2001 Class A Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I  am  duly   authorized  to  execute  and  deliver  this   Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and

     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied with all
           conditions and covenants  under the  Transaction  Documents,  for the
           Crusade  Global  Trust No. 2 of 2001  issue of Notes  for the  period
           between  October 1, 2002 and the end of the Manager's  fiscal year on
           September 30, 2003.

     Capitalized  terms used and not  defined  herein  shall  have the  meanings
assigned  to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced
issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 24, 2004.



                                                 /S/  G.M. BARTLETT
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 By:     G.M. Bartlett
                                                 Title:  Director
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1887

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation on 

prescribing drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in group 

practices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2003

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, and Mr. BIDEN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient 

limitation on prescribing drug addiction treatments by 

medical practitioners in group practices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE 30-PATIENT LIMIT FOR 

4 GROUP PRACTICES. 

5 Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substance Act 

6 (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause 

7 (iv).

Æ
t was 7

For more information, please visit: https://www.nasa.gov/emd/energy-and-water-management

AT NASA

In FY21, NASA used 

7,432 billion btus 

– enough to power 

96,395 homes

for one year.

1%

3%

5%

7%

9%

11%

13%

15%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

This energy supports 

every aspect of NASA’s 

mission, including big 

energy uses like

• office buildings

• research laboratories

• data centers

• wind tunnels

• spacecraft assembly facilities

• thermal vacuum chambers

• test stands

• launch pads

• antennas

All that energy 

comes at a cost...

In FY21, NASA spent

$98 million

on energy

16%

17%

18%

19%

20%

Langley

Goddard

Marshall

Ames

JPL

Kennedy

Johnson

Glenn

Michoud

Wallops

Stennis

Armstrong

Goldstone

White Sands TF

White Sands C

Armstrong TF

FY21 Center Energy Use

(% of Total Agency Use)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

NP-2022-09-3077-HQ
#### W. N. Owens *v.*F. M. Cox.

.New Trial — Suit in Equity.

In a suit in equity to vacate a judgment rendered by default, the averments of the petition must bring the case within the revisory powers of the court as limited and defined by section 579 of the Civil Code of Practice, and where the facts alleged do not constitute any one of the grounds prescribed by said section a judgment which is sought to be vacated or modified thereby will not be disturbed.

APPEAL PROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

January 20, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin:

This was a suit in equity to vacate a judgment rendered by default in the Pulaski Circuit Court in favor of the appellee, F. M. Cox, against Owens, on the 1st day of April, 1865, for the ■sum of $145 with interest from 16th of March, 1863, subject to a •credit of $30.

The petition alleges, in excuse of the failure of appellant to' appear and defend the action, that although served with a summons nearly two years prior to the judgment, he was in the military service of the United States, and part of the time a prisoner of war, till in February, 1865, when he returned home; that in the ■confusion of the times and the returning home after a long .absence, and settling his accounts as an officer in the Federal army, ■as he was compelled to do immediately under heavy penalties, he -overlooked and forgot for the time being that such an action was pending against him, or that process had been served on him; and he knew no better until after judgment was rendered and execution was issued. The petition further alleges that appellant at the time the process was served on him employed counsel to defend the action, who promised to attend to the case and file an answer, and he supposed the defense had been made, and knew no better until after the judgment had been rendered.

The Civil Code of Practice, section 579, prescribes the grounds -on which a judgment or final order may be vacated or modified in the court in which it was rendered, after the expiration of the term at which such judgment or order was rendered, and unless the averments of the petition of the appellant are sufficient to bring his case within the revisory power of the Circuit Court, as *81it is thus limited and defined by the Code, he was not entitled to -any relief, although the judgment which he seeks to revise may .have been unauthorized and reversible in this court. (Anderson *v.*Anderson, 18 B. Mon. 98.) And as the facts alleged by the •appellant do not, in our opinion, constitute any one of the grounds prescribed by said section of the Code for vacating or modifying the judgment, the judgment dismissing the appellant’s petition and dissolving his injunction is affirmed, with damages.

*Owsley & Burdett, for appellant.*

*McKee, Fox & Van Winkle, for appellee.*
- Space Flight Awareness
- About Us
- Awards and Criteria   - Flight Safety
  - Honoree Award
  - Management Award
  - Silver Snoopy Award
  - Special Local Award
  - Supplier Award
  - Team Award
  - Trailblazer Award
- Awards Database
- Call for Nominations   - 2024 Call for Nominations
  - Honoree Call for Nominations
  - Nomination Form
- More   - Contacts
  - Event Photos
  - Posters
  - Program Plan  Trailblazer Award    This award is used to recognize employees who are in the early stages of their career. Awardees must demonstrate strong work ethic and creative, innovative thinking in support of human spaceflight.    **CRITERIA**  Trailblazer Award  Credits: NASA  This award is presented to NASA and NASA contractor employees in any field (technical, professional, etc.) supporting human space flight during the first seven years of an individual’s career.  In addition, potential awardees must meet two or more criteria below:    - Characterize innovation or creative initiative that demonstrates a significant contribution to the employees’ organization in support of NASA’s mission and goals.
  - Identify new, creative solutions to problems.
  - Embody strong work ethic including loyalty, honesty and integrity.
  - Works collaboratively with others to achieve a goal in support of NASA’s mission.
  - Demonstrates steps towards establishing long-term vision and strategy.  The SFA Trailblazer Award is not intended for supervisors and managers at the branch chief level and above or equivalent levels within industry.  This award may not be presented to an awardee but once.  Download Criteria: trailblazer_criteria_recognition.docx   Download SFA Awards Nomination Form: sfa_awards_nomination_form.pdf  SFA Awards      The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 12, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Daniel C. Rendon								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 67023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27677]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 67023]]


                Memorandum of September 20, 2010

                
Delegation of Waiver Authority Pursuant to 
                Section 107(a) of Public Law 110-457

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions 
                conferred upon the President by section 107(a) of the 
                William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection 
                Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-457).

                You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    WASHINGTON, September 20, 2010

[FR Doc. 2010-27677
Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEVIN G. WILLIAMS.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Hichcox and Another *v.*Eastman.—In error.

TWO returns of “not found” to writs of *scire facias*issued by a justice of the peace in one county on the transcript of the mayor of a city in another county, will authorize the plaintiff to proceed in the cause. See *Kearns*v. *The State,*3 Blackf. 334.—R. S. 1838, p. 375, s. 51.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Edward J. Quilty, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the “Form 10-Q”) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.




Dated:  August
      12, 2010
            /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward
      J. QuiltyChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)