alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

LIMITED WAIVER OF BASE SALARY AGREEMENT
This Limited Waiver of Base Salary Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of this 25th day of March 2020 by and between Liquidity Services, Inc. (the “Corporation”), and the undersigned executive officer of the Corporation (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Corporation is taking numerous proactive steps to mitigate the negative financial and operational impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic;
WHEREAS, these business contingency plans include, among other steps, implementing remote and virtual work plans, cancelling non-essential travel and spending, reducing the pay of employees, shortening work weeks, and furloughs; 
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive and the Corporation have entered into an Executive Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive has voluntarily agreed to allow the Corporation to reduce his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the period of time from April 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 (the “Covered Period”).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the Executive agree to the following:
1.  Term. This Agreement shall be in force and effective throughout the Covered Period.
2.  Reduced Base Salary During the Covered Period. The Executive hereby voluntarily agrees to the Corporation reducing his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the Covered Period.  Such a reduction shall not be deemed a breach of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement.  Executive and the Corporation further agree that the foregoing does not lower base salary for any other purpose under Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation, including, without limitation, the calculation of any severance payment in the event of a termination.
3.  Miscellaneous. To the extent not subject to federal law, this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and each of their respective affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns. This Agreement is not intended to amend or otherwise change or modify the terms of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation except as expressly set forth herein.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and the Executive have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.








																					
							
	EXECUTIVE				LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.		
							
	/s/ Nick Rozdilsky
						
	

Name: Nick Rozdilsky             _____________
				By:		/s/ William P. Angrick, III

				



		 William P. Angrick, III
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1699

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent for nonemergency 

intrusive physical examinations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent 

for nonemergency intrusive physical examinations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HEAD START ACT AMENDMENT IMPOSING PA4 RENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON5 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA6 TIONS. 

7 The Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
2

•S 1699 IS 

1 ‘‘SEC. 657A. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON2 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA3 TIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A Head Start agency shall ob5 tain written parental consent before administration of any 

6 nonemergency intrusive physical examination of a child in 

7 connection with participation in a program under this sub8 chapter. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘nonemergency intru10 sive physical examination’ means, with respect to a child, 

11 a physical examination that—

12 ‘‘(1) is not immediately necessary to protect the 

13 health or safety of the child involved or the health 

14 or safety of another individual; and 

15 ‘‘(2) requires incision or is otherwise invasive, 

16 or involves exposure of private body parts’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1
I, Thomas A. Daiber, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 12, 2004 /s/ Thomas A. Daiber   Thomas A. Daiber Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 27, 2001

Before

Hon. John L. Coffey, Circuit Judge

Hon. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge

 Hon. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge

No. 00-1978

Dana R. Walker,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Dan Glickman, in his official capacity as

Secretary, United States Department of

Agriculture,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District

of Illinois, Peoria Division

No. 99C1062

Joe B. McDade, 

Judge.

Order Correcting Opinion

The slip opinion in this case issued today, is corrected as follows:

P. 8, eleventh line of second full paragraph: “1991" is changed to “1990".

SO ORDERED.
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

April 3, 2019
General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Space
Policy Institute/George Washington University Dinner on May 1, 2019

On May 1, 2019, the Space Policy Institute (SPI) of George Washington University’s
(GWU) Elliott School of International Affairs, a not-for-profit organization under Section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold a dinner at the DACOR Bacon
House in Washington, DC, starting at 6:30 p.m. SPI is in control of the planning,
organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. The guest speaker at the event will be Dr.
Fred G. Kennedy III, Director of U.S. Department of Defense, Space Development
Agency.

Approximately 50 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity
of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of
the legislative branch, and representatives from academia, industry, and members of the
public. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is approximately
$70 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the
requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

| further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees —
including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13770 — who do not have a significant role in a matter
affecting the interests of SPI or GWU may accept an invitation for free attendance to the
event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs
any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the
performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or
negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination

from their local ethics ay? as to whether they may accept the invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 2, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GARLON P. ELLIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT ULIBARRI, Warden; GARY

K. KING, Attorney General for the State

of New Mexico,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 09-2290 

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-00481-JB-CG)

ORDER

The stipulation filed by the parties to dismiss the captioned appeal is granted. See

10th Cir R 46.3(B), Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9). Each party

shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-2290 Document: 01018376275 Date Filed: 03/02/2010 Page: 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0163]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Draft Guidance, Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3794, e-mail:                         *Jonnalynn.capezzuto@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 6, 2009 (74 FR 51285), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0595. The approval expires on January 31, 2013. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-27160 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERALD MC CAULEY.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 157 *N. J. Super.*349)
#### N. B. Thomas and Wife *v.*H. C. R. Greenwad’s Exr.

Wills — 'Contingent Devisee.

The devisee is entitled to the land when he pays the debt, which the testator prescribes as an indispensable condition to his title.

No statutory limitation can relieve a devisee of the liability upon which his title depends.

Husband and Wife — Coverture — Wife’s Note.

The wife’s coverture not only avoids her note, but exempts her from any personal judgment.

ARPEAD RROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

October 5, 1866.

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Robertson:

N. B. Thomas is entitled to the land only when he pays the debt,' the payment by him of which the testator prescribed as an indispensable condition to his title as a devisee. The compulsive páyment by the executor was not a payment by the contingent devisere and did not change the *status*of the title which could not pass to the devisee until he reimbursed the amount of his liability which was secured by his dependent title to the land. No statutory limitation, therefore, can relieve him from that inherent liability or invest in him the title.

He has not shown that he made full payment, and should bp well satisfied that his wife’s note given on a settlement of that' matter, although not enforcible against her title, recites the amount still unpaid.

Her coverture not only avoided her note but exempted her from any personal judgment which, as rendered, is erroneous and, *366therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded for a judgment conformable with this opinion, just such as hitherto rendered, only leaving W. S. Thomas out.

No judgment, $1 costs.
EXHIBIT 21.1


         Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, along with the
total number of active subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by each as of
April 12, 2005. Ownership is 100% unless indicated otherwise.

                                                      U.S.          Non-U.S.

Caspian Services Group Limited, Kazakhstan                             1
  CJSC Bauta, Kazakhstan*

TatArka, LLP, Kazakhstan

         The Company also owns a 50% equity interest in Kazmorgeophyisica CJSC.
Caspian Services owns a 50% equity interest in Bautino Development Company LLP,
Kazakhstan

--------
* 56% owned subsidiary of Caspian.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1791

AN ACT

To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 to provide

that the amounts received by the United States under

that Act shall be deposited in the reclamation fund,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1791 ES

1 SECTION 1. LEASE LOT CONVEYANCE.

2 Section 4(b) of the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of

3 2002 (116 Stat. 2879) is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘As consideration’’ and inserting

5 the following:

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—As consideration’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(2) USE.—Amounts received under paragraph

9 (1) shall be—

10 ‘‘(A) deposited by the Secretary, on behalf

11 of the Rio Grande Project, in the reclamation

12 fund established under the first section of the

13 Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C. 391); and

14 ‘‘(B) made immediately available to the Ir15 rigation Districts, to be credited in accordance

16 with section 4(I) of the Act of December 5,

17 1924 (43 U.S.C. 501).’’.

Passed the Senate September 15, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1791

AN ACT

To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002

in the reclamation fund, and for other purposes.United States under that Act shall be depositedto provide that the amounts received by the
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Reading Comprehension Guide

ISSUE No. 1: DREAM TO REALITY

First Woman, a series of interactive 

graphic novels, follows fictional astronaut 

Callie Rodriguez, the first woman to 

explore the Moon. While Callie is a fictional 

character, the first female astronaut and 

person of color will soon set foot on the 

Moon—a historic milestone for NASA and 

humanity.

GREETINGS HUMAN!

Scan the QR code to learn about 

our journey to the Moon.

Issue No. 1 

Dream to Reality follows 

Callie’s trailblazing path as 

the first woman on the Moon. 

Callie and her robot sidekick, RT, overcome setbacks, 

disappointment, and tragedy along the way. From her 

childhood dreams of space travel to being selected as an 

astronaut, Callie takes us on her journey to the Moon.

LINKS

 Read Online: https://nasa.gov/calliefirst/#book

 Explore First Woman: https://nasa.gov/calliefirst

 WebAR: https://nasa.8thwall.app/firstwoman/

 Learn about Artemis: https://nasa.gov/artemis

 READ THE STORY AND DISCUSS 

THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS

1. Who was the first woman in space?

2. Why do you think RT was stowed in the bathroom of the 

Orion spacecraft on the way to the Moon?

3. Where did Mrs. Hernandez recommend that Callie go 

based on the doodles on her homework? 

www.nasa.gov continued 
PAGE 2

QUESTIONS (continued)

4. What did Callie make for the science fair?

5. Who is RT named after? 

6. What job did Callie do after college? How do you think 

this experience made her a better astronaut?

7. What kinds of equipment will be at the Artemis Base 

Camp? 

8. What are some skills Callie learned on her journey to 

becoming an astronaut? How did these skills help 

her on the Moon?

9. What is the name of the type of robot that 

Callie and Dan rescued? 

10. What emergency did the astronauts encounter while 

investigating the lava tunnel?

BONUS: What was RT’s original purpose?

WRITING EXTENSION EXERCISE

Who inspires you?

Callie’s dad inspired her to choose a STEM career, so 

much so that she named her robot after him. Who is 

someone in your life that inspires you? What traits do 

you admire about them? What have they inspired you 

to do or become?

ART EXTENSION EXERCISE

What would your robot do? Draw a picture of what your robot would look like. 

Callie made her first version of RT out of paper towel 

rolls and a later version out of car parts. If you were 

building your own robot, what materials would you 

use? What skills would you want to teach your robot? 

Draw a picture of what your robot would look like. 

Label the parts and the functions.

FIRST WOMAN Reading Comprehension Guide
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Fred W. Wagenhals, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance Companies, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrantsinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ Fred W. Wagenhals     Fred W. Wagenhals  Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2005  
26