alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                              NEWTEK CAPITAL, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Wilshire Advisors, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire New York Advisers II, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire New York Partners III, LLC, a New York limited liability company
The Whitestone Group, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Wilshire Investors, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company
Wilshire Louisiana Advisers, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company
Wilshire Louisiana Partners, II, a Louisiana limited liability company
Wilshire Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Newtek Securities, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Newtek Capital, Inc., a New York corporation
BJB Holdings, Inc. , a New York corporation
Wilshire Holdings I, a New York corporation
Wilshire Holdings II, a New York corporation
REXX Environmental Corporation, a New York corporation
Whitestone Capital Markets, Inc., a New York corporation

                                      F-1
Arlington,
cay, cemeten

\
NN

£ Willennium
Project

/ ‘Superintendent's, 7.
po LOE geet

jf FUTURE é

EXPANSION ‘Ol, Avtingtdh
j SITE; Eministaton, Pen
I ao

uD POS Teagan | ~

CHAPEI HT A
y LIGHT 103
09 oe

ao :
(= ay,

\
\
\
|

wa

MCCLELLAN GATE|

BEIRUT
BARRACKS

59

CANADIAN cROSSTM”

Joint Base ) COLUMBIA MEMORIAL

iver ES
Henderson “|

\

ae :
% 56)
= cs
CIRCUES.
57 xX

Challenger &
AC olumbia

Pema

uewoniae, 10)

a BRADLEY DR
Zi 3
‘ <

toe W Z| bs EZ

MEMORIAL,

saree)

66
ke eenrqon none
yl s eS /
= < a.
ome S G 8 (Cae )
\ i ie
Bassett

Freeman
See

‘The Pentagon

x

PENTAGON MEMORIA,

usin FoRcE
MEMORIAL

we
Annex
6.° 250,\ $00 1,000 1,500 2\000, 4395)
Feet )
# Sitemap

## August 16, 2015

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2015
- 08
- August 16, 2015

            - Bad Weather Again Delays Launch of Japanese Cargo Ship to Space Station
            - Dione Flyby 5 (D-5): Aug. 17, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tribeworks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Davidorf, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


March 30, 2004

                                    /s/ ROBERT C. DAVIDORF
                                    _______________________
                                    By: Robert Davidorf
                                    Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO TRIBEWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY TRIBEWORKS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
ORION

DESKTOP MODEL

BUILD IT

TWEET IT

#MYORION

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov
Step-by-Step Assembly Diagram

Following these steps, align numbered tabs to 

their corresponding locations in consecutive order.

Docking 

Collar

Crew 

Module

Crew Module 

Fairing

Service 

Module

Service Module Aft 

Bulkhead

Solar Array 

(4)

Service Module Forward Bulkhead

Crew

Module 

Assembly 

from Step 1

Aft Fairing 

with High Gain 

Antenna

Outer Nozzle Aft Fairing

(Black on inside)

Inner Nozzle

(Black on inside)

Umbilical 

Fairing

Display 

Stand

Starfield/planets

on inside surface

Twist planets 

outward 

slightly. 

Do not 

break off!

Carefully

insert display 

stand into two slits 

underneath model

Attitude 

Control 

System (4)

1 2 3

4 5

Fold each solar panel in 

half and tape together. 

Tape the 4 solar arrays 

to the inside of service 

module aft bulkhead 

before attaching the aft 

bulkhead to the service 

module.

The Orion Spacecraft

Orion is NASA’s new spacecraft that will launch atop the 

world’s most powerful rocket, the Space Launch System, 

to take astronauts on a journey of exploration to the Moon 

and beyond as it embarks on a series of deep-space 

missions. Beginning with Artemis I, astronauts will learn 

to live and work in lunar orbit on long-duration missions 

lasting weeks and months that will prepare them for the 

eventual multiyear missions to Mars. 

The Orion spacecraft is made up of three major elements. 

Astronauts will live, work, and control the spacecraft inside the 

Crew Module. The Service Module provides power and propulsion 

for Orion as well as air and water for the crew. The Launch Abort 

System will propel the crew to safety in case of an emergency 

during launch or ascent.

Build your own Orion and join us on our journey to explore 

around the Moon where astronauts will prepare for 

missions to other deep space destinations in the future. 

Learn more at nasa.gov/orion

and share your creation with us 

on Twitter with #MyOrion.
36

37 38

39

1

1

2

3

4

3

4

2

7

8

9

10

28

29

30

31

35

34

42

43

47

Solar Arrays

Aft Fairing

Service Module 

Aft Bulkhead

Crew

Module 

Fairing

Attitude 

Control 

System

Attitude 

Control 

System

36

37 38

39
44

45

44

45

46

46

SOLAR PANEL

SOLAR PANEL

SOLAR PANEL

SOLAR PANEL
7

9

8

10

40

40

41

41

43

23

23

24 25 26 27

31 30 28 29

32

33

32 33 34 35

49

50

Solar Arrays

Outer Nozzle

Inner Nozzle

Service 

Module

Crew

 Module

Aft Fairing

5

5

6

6

13

14

46

7

9

8

10

40

40

41

41

42

43

4544

4544

4544

4544
46

46
11

11

12

12

13 14

15

20

18

17

19

16 22

21

24

27

25

26

36

37

38

39

46 46

47

48

Umbilical 48

Fairing

Docking Collar

Display Stand

Service Module 

Forward Bulkhead

Attitude 

Control 

System

Attitude 

Control 

System
www.nasa.gov

NP-2018-07-016-JSC

44

45

44

45

49

50
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Cascade Designs, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62378

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. W911QY

- 17

- D

- 0246 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : William A. Shook, Esq.

The Law Offices of William A. Shook PLLC

Seattle, WA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Jill B. Wiley, JA

MAJ Nhu Thi To Tran, JA

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 2 8 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62378

- ADR

, Appeal of Cascade

Designs, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 31, 2022 LAURA EYESTER

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000592

28-DEC-2018

07:48 AM
#### Alfredo VIDRIO-OSUNA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70763.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2003.

Alfredo Vidrio-Osuna, pro se, Taft, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Michael T. Dougherty, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Michelle R. Slack, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*845Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies petitioner's motion for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredo Vidrio-Osuna, a federal prisoner and native of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings as untimely and for failure to raise new evidence. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Salta v. INS,*314 F.3d 1076, 1078 (9th Cir.2002), and deny the petition.

Our decision in *Perdomo-Padilla v. Ashcroft,*333 F.3d 964, 965 (9th Cir.2003), forecloses Vidrio-Osuna’s contention that he is a national of the United States not subject to removal because he has indicated his complete allegiance to the United States by filing an application for naturalization.

Vidrio-Osuna’s remaining contentions also lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1692 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1692

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ``Hugh Gregg Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2003

  Mr. Sununu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ``Hugh Gregg Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HUGH GREGG POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Hugh Gregg Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Hugh Gregg 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services,
LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2010



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer and Chief Operating Officer of
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)                                    

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lex. & Big Sandy R. R. Co. (Eastern Division) *v.*Willis Fain.

Railroads — Right of Way — Use — Liability of New Corporation — Lien.

Appellee sold a right of way over his land to the railroad corporation for $200, payable in two installments. He failed to collect the amount so due, and the company’s property, bonds, etc., were sold by order of court, and purchased by appellants, a new corporation, organized under a new charter or act of the Legislature. *Held,*that the new organization cannot be made liable for the debts of the first organization, never having assumed any of its obligations.

Same — Vendor’s Lien — Easement.

The vendor having sold only an easement, the legal title to the land being still vested in himself, he cannot subject the land to a vendor’s lien.

APPEAL EROM GREENUP CIRCUIT COURT.

Dulin, for Appellant.

*D. K.*Weis, for Appellee.

June 1, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams :

Appellee sold the right of way over his land to the original company chartered as the Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad Company, for $200, to be paid in two equal installments; having failed to collect this before the company failed and its bonds, property, and purchases were sold to appellants, by virtue of a decree of the chancellor, who organized as a new company under another charter or act of the Legislature, he cannot hold this new company responsible for his debts because he did not sell the right to the land but only a right to use the land for the purpose of a railway; therefore he has no vendor’s lien and having no lien on the land, because it still legally belonged to himself subject only to the uses as contracted for, he can have no claim against the new company who never in any manner assumed to' pay their debts. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss plaintiff’s petition against appellants.
BRIAN T. O’LEARY (PH.D.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (DECEASED)

PERSONAL DATA: Born January 27, 1940, in Boston, Massachusetts. Died 

July 28, 2011. He is survived by his wife, Meredith, and two children from a former 

marriage. He enjoyed photography, hiking, cartooning, jazz piano and yoga. 

EDUCATION: Graduated from Belmont High School, Belmont, Massachusetts, in 

1957; received bachelor of arts degree in physics from Williams College in 1961, a 

masters of arts in astronomy from Georgetown University in 1964, and a doctor of 

philosophy in astronomy from the University of California at Berkeley in 1967. 

ORGANIZATIONS: Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of 

Science (1975 to 2011); secretary of the Planetology Section, American Geophysical 

Union (1970 to 1976); team leader of the Asteroidal Resources Group, NASA Ames 

Summer Study on Space Settlements (1977). 

SPECIAL HONORS: Recipient of NASA Distinguished Group Achievement Award, Mariner 10 Mission, 1975; Eagle 

Scout. 

PUBLICATIONS: Authored or co-authored more than one hundred peer-reviewed scientific papers, including: “The 

influence of lunar mascons on its dynamical figure,” Nature, 220, 1309, 1968; and O’Leary, Campbell and Sagan, “Lunar and 

planetary mass concentrations,” Science, 165, 651, 1969. Was also an editor for several books, including Space 

Manufacturing from Nonterrestrial Materials, edited by O’Neill and O’Leary, vol. 57 of Progress in Astronautics and 

Aeronautics, AIAA, 1977; and Space Resources and Space Settlements, edited by O’Neill, Billingham, Gilbreath and 

O’Leary, NASA SP-428, 1979. O’Leary also authored more than ten books, including Project Space Station, Stackpole 

Books, 1983; and Mars 1999, Stackpole Books, 1987.

EXPERIENCE: From 1969 to 1971, O’Leary was assistant professor of astronomy at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; 

from 1970 to 1971, he was a senior consultant at the NASA Ames Research Center; from 1976 to 1981, he was a member of 

the research faculty for the Department of Physics at Princeton University, New Jersey; from 1982 to 1987, he was a senior 

scientist at Science Applications International Corporation in Hermosa Beach, California.

NASA EXPERIENCE: O’Leary was selected as a scientist-astronaut by NASA in August 1967. After completing a Ph.D. 

thesis on the physical properties of the Martian surface, O’Leary was specifically selected for a potential manned Mars 

mission when it was still in NASA’s program plan. When that program was cancelled in 1968, he resigned from the astronaut 

program because of lack of prospects for a spaceflight.

AUGUST 2011

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
*

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and

collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 09-2248

v. (D. New Mexico)

BENIGNO LINAREZ-FLORES,

Defendant - Appellant.

(D.C. No. 2:09-CR-01697-JAP-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Mr. Linarez-Flores pleaded guilty to the charge of re-entry of a deported

alien, contrary to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because he had committed a felony crime of

violence (a vicious attack on his pregnant wife) before his deportation, his

adjusted offense level was 24 under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. 

After adjustments for acceptance of responsibility, his total offense level was 21. 

With a criminal-history category of I, his advisory guidelines range was 37-46

Appellate Case: 09-2248 Document: 01018377067 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

months’ imprisonment. The district court varied downward from the advisory

range and imposed a term of imprisonment of 24 months. The court also

recommended that “Immigration and Customs Enforcement begin removal

proceedings during service of sentence.” R., Vol. 1 at 18.

On appeal Mr. Linarez-Flores contends that the district court abused its

discretion by not varying downward even further. We construe this contention as

a claim that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reject the claim.

Under our decision in United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1054 (10th

Cir. 2006), we would presume that a sentence of Mr. Linarez-Flores within the

advisory guideline range of 37-46 months was substantively reasonable—that is,

neither unreasonably harsh nor unreasonably lenient. Thus, he has an even

greater burden to overcome the presumption that the more-lenient sentence of 24

months was unreasonably harsh. Yet his sole argument on appeal to distinguish

him from others who committed his offense and have his criminal history is that

when he was arrested he was being driven to his home of El Salvador. In our

view, that argument does not suffice to overcome the presumption.

Appellate Case: 09-2248 Document: 01018377067 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 2 
-3-

We AFFIRM the judgment and sentence below.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 09-2248 Document: 01018377067 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 3
#### Dickens et al. *v.*Yelton et al.

Judgment Against Administrator and Heirs.

In a judgment against an administrator it should be ordered that the amount be made of assets unadministered in the hands of the personal representation, and of assets descended to the heirs.

Lis Pendens.

Actual service must be had to constitute *lis pendens.*

APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

February 23, 1866.

Opinion

by the Court :

In his original petition Dickens alleges that there was an incumbrance on the land he purchased of Hobner, but does not point out the character or estate of the incumbrance. In his amended petition he expressly states that at the time of his purchase he knew his vendor had mortgaged the land for the purchase price, and.that the same was unpaid, and notwithstanding his knowledge of these facts he assigned the two notes on Tarvin to Hobner in part satisfaction of the price he agreed to pay for said land, which by the several assignments set forth passed the one to Yelton and the other to Clary upon valuable considerations.

It appears that a part of the land was sold by virtue of a judgment of foreclosure to satisfy the debt secured by the mortgage, which Dickens was apprised of when he assigned the notes to Hobner. There is no evidence that at the time the notes were assigned to Yelton and Clary respectively they had any notice of the existence of the equity relied upon by Dickens.

At the dates of the ássignments of the notes it. does not appear in this record that process had been executed on Yelton, Clary, or George Hobner; indeed it does not appear that a summons even had ever been executed on George Hobner, and where these assignees took the notes as to them there was no *Us*pendens, and there is no evidence that they had any notice of Dickens’ equity.

. If the judgment for the damages and costs is in fact against the administrator and heirs to be levied of their own goods, a construction which we are inclined to think it will not bear, still *378the court below will upon return of the cause order the amount to be made of assets unadministered in the hands of the personal representative and of assets descended to the heirs of Dickens.

Judgment affirmed.