Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 66349 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 

6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

To calculate the cash deposit rate for 

Wieland, we divided its total dumping 

margin by the total net value of its sales 

during the review period. The following 

deposit rates will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of BSS from Germany entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 

companies subject to this review will be 

the rate established in the final results 

of this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.5 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent final results for a review 

in which that manufacturer or exporter 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent final results for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 

firm covered in this or any previous 

review conducted by the Department, 

the cash deposit rate will be 7.30 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation. See 

Antidumping Duty Order: Brass Sheet 

and Strip from the Federal Republic of 

Germany, 52 FR 6997 (March 6, 1987), 

amended at 52 FR 35750 (September 23, 

1987). These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

These final results of review are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: October 21, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix: Comments in the Amended 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

Comment 1: Whether To Use Wieland’s Daily 

Metal Costs for Purposes of Computing 

Costs of Production for the Sales Below 

Cost Test 

Comment 2: Whether the Department’s 

Quarterly Indexed Cost Methodology Meets 

the Requirements of the Statute’s Cost 

Recovery Test 

Comment 3: Whether To Revise Wieland’s 

General and Administrative (G&A) Expense 

Ratio 

Comment 4: Whether To Make Other 

Adjustments to the OTHMAT Costs, 

Fabrication Costs and General and 

Administrative Expenses 

Comment 5: Whether the Department Should 

Adjust for Fluctuations in Metal Price in its 

Comparison of Export Price to Normal 

Value 

Comment 6: Whether the Department Should 

Exclude Samples and Trial Shipments 

From its Antidumping Analysis 

Comment 7: Whether Facts Available Should 

Be Applied 

Comment 8: Whether Wieland’s U.S. Sale is 

Bona Fide 

Comment 9: Whether To Make a Finding of 

Reimbursement of Antidumping Duties 

[FR Doc. 2010–27295 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received requests 

to conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with 

September anniversary dates. In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with 

September anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting date. 

Notice of No Sales 

Under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the 

Department may rescind a review where 

there are no exports, sales, or entries of 

subject merchandise during the 

respective period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

listed below. If a producer or exporter 

named in this notice of initiation had no 

exports, sales, or entries during the 

POR, it must notify the Department 

within 60 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

Department will consider rescinding the 

review only if the producer or exporter, 

as appropriate, submits a properly filed 

and timely statement certifying that it 

had no exports, sales, or entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review. All submissions must be 

made in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303 and are subject to verification 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’). Six copies of the submission 

should be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Room 1870, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on every party on the 

Department’s service list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
66350 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’). We intend to release the CBP 

data under Administrative Protective 

Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an 

APO within seven days of publication of 

this initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 

Federal Register notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the applicable 

review. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the Department analyzes each 

entity exporting the subject 

merchandise under a test arising from 

the Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Sparklers From the 

People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 

(May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide From the 

People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). In accordance with the 

separate-rates criteria, the Department 

assigns separate rates to companies in 

NME cases only if respondents can 

demonstrate the absence of both de jure 

and de facto government control over 

export activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate-rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate-rate 

application or certification, as described 

below. For these administrative reviews, 

in order to demonstrate separate-rate 

eligibility, the Department requires 

entities for whom a review was 

requested, that were assigned a separate 

rate in the most recent segment of this 

proceeding in which they participated, 

to certify that they continue to meet the 

criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://www.trade.gov/ia on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register. In 

responding to the certification, please 

follow the ‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to the Department 

no later than 60 days after publication 

of this Federal Register notice. The 

deadline and requirement for submitting 

a Certification applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers who purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

For entities that have not previously 

been assigned a separate rate, to 

demonstrate eligibility for such, the 

Department requires a Separate Rate 

Status Application. The Separate Rate 

Status Application will be available on 

the Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.trade.gov/ia on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. In responding to the Separate 

Rate Status Application, refer to the 

instructions contained in the 

application. Separate Rate Status 

Applications are due to the Department 

no later than 60 days after publication 

of this Federal Register notice. The 

deadline and requirement for submitting 

a Separate Rate Status Application 

applies equally to NME-owned firms, 

wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign 

sellers that purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

For exporters and producers who 

submit a separate-rate status application 

or certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents, 

these exporters and producers will no 

longer be eligible for separate-rate status 

unless they respond to all parts of the 

questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with sections 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating 

administrative reviews of the following 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders and findings. We intend to issue 

the final results of these reviews not 

later than September 30, 2011. 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

India: Certain Lined Paper Products, A–533–843 ......................................................................................................................... 9/1/09–8/31/10 

Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. 

American Scholar, Inc. and/or I-Scholar 

Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd. 

AR Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt 

Bafna Exports 

Cello International Pvt. Ltd. (M/S Cello Paper Products) 

Creative Divya 

Corporate Stationery Pvt. Ltd. 

D.D International 

Excel India (Pvt.) Ltd. 

Exmart International Pvt. Ltd. 

Fatechand Mahendrakumar 

FFI International 

Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd. 

International Greetings Pvt. Ltd. 

Kejriwal Paper Ltd. and Kejriwal Exports 

Lodha Offset Limited 

Magic International Pvt Ltd. 

Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd. 

Marisa International 

Navneet Publications (India) Ltd. 

Orient Press Ltd. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 66351 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Paperwise Inc. 

Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd. 

Premier Exports 

Rajvansh International 

Riddhi Enterprises 

SAB International 

Sar Transport Systems 

Seet Kamal International 

Sonal Printers Pvt Ltd. 

Super Impex 

Swati Growth Funds Ltd. 

V & M 

Yash Laminates 

The People’s Republic of China: Certain Lined Paper Products,1 A–570–901 ............................................................................ 9/1/09–8/31/10 

Shanghai Lian Li Paper Products Co., Ltd. 

Leo’s Quality Products Co., Ltd./Denmax Plastic Stationary Factory 

Watanabe Group (consisting of the following companies): 

Watanabe Paper Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

Watanabe Paper Products (Linqing) Co., Ltd. 

Hotrock Stationery (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 

The People’s Republic of China: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires,2 A–570–912 ...................................................... 9/1/09–8/31/10 

Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. 

Guizhou Advance Rubber Co., Ltd. 

Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Corporation 

Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co., Ltd. 

Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd. 

KS Holding Limited/KS Resources Limited 

Laizhou Xiongying Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. 

Mai Shandong Radial Tyre Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Company, LTD. 

Qingdao Tiafa Group Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. 

Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. 

The People’s Republic of China: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat,3 A–570–848 .......................................................................... 9/1/09–8/31/10 

China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Nanjing Gemsen International Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Ocean Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd. 

Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. 

Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. 

Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. 

The People’s Republic of China: Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks,4 5 A–570–941 ........................................................... 3/5/09–8/31/10 

Asia Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 

Asia Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 

Guangdong Wire King Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Foshun Shunde Wireking Housewares & Hardware) 

Hangzhou Dunli Import & Export Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Dunli Industry Co., Ltd. 

Hengtong Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Weixi Group Co. 

King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. (parent company of New King Shan (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd.) 

Leader Metal Industry Co., Ltd. (aka Marmon Retail Services Asia) 

New King Shan (Zhu Hai) Co., Ltd. 

Taiwan Rail Company 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Brazil: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products, C–351–829 ............................................................................................ 1/1/09–12/31/09 

Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.—Usiminas 

Companhia Siderurgica Paulista—Cosipa 

The People’s Republic of China: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires, C–570–913 ....................................................... 1/1/09–12/31/09 

Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. 

Guizhou Advance Rubber Co., Ltd. 

Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Corporation 

Qingda Etyre International Trade Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Hengda Tyres Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Sinorient International Ltd. 

Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Huitong Tyre Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. 

Techking Tires Limited 

Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd. 

The People’s Republic of China: Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks,6 C–570–942 ............................................................. 1/7/09–12/31/09 

Asia Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 

Asia Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 

Guangdong Wire King Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Foshun Shunde 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
66352 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Wireking Housewares & Hardware) 

Hangzhou Dunli Import & Export Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Dunli Industry Co., Ltd. 

Hengtong Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Weixi Group Co. 

King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. (parent company of New King Shan (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd.) 

Leader Metal Industry Co., Ltd. (aka Marmon Retail Services Asia) 

New King Shan (Zhu Hai) Co., Ltd. 

Taiwan Rail Company 

1 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain Lined Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 2 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 3 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the PRC 

who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part. 4 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from 

the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named 

exporters are a part. 5Petitioners, SSW Holding Company, Inc. and Nashville Wire Products, Inc, also requested a review of five additional companies. However, 

the Department has sought additional information as to why Petitioners desire a review of these companies, as required by 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1). We are still considering the appropriateness of initiating a review of these five companies. Therefore, at this time, we are not initiating a review with respect to the following companies: Asia Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Asia Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Hengtong Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd., Taiwan Rail Company, and King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. 6See footnote 5. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable for the POR. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed in 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act, (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(I). 

Dated: October 25, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27296 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of Antidumping Anticircumvention Inquiry 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and 

Chattem Chemicals, Inc., domestic 

interested parties in the abovereferenced proceeding (‘‘domestic 

interested parties’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

initiating an antidumping anticircumvention inquiry pursuant to 

section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘the Act’’). This inquiry 

will examine whether the activities of 

three Indian companies, Salvi Chemical 

Industries (allegedly affiliated with 

Nutracare International) (collectively, 

‘‘Salvi’’), Paras Intermediates Pvt. Ltd. 

(‘‘Paras’’), and AICO Laboratories India 

Ltd. (‘‘AICO’’) are circumventing the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC). 

See Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine 

from People’s Republic of China, 60 FR 

16116 (March 29, 1995) (‘‘PRC Glycine 

Order ’’). 

DATES: Effective Date: October 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Cordell or Olga Carter, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0408 or (202) 482– 

8221, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 18, 2009, the domestic 

interested parties filed a request for 

initiation of an anti-circumvention 

inquiry, alleging two companies (AICO 

and Paras) were circumventing the order 

covering glycine from the PRC under 

section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES