alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Ancillary Study in 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis.
    Date: December 1, 2010.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Maria E. Davila-Bloom, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 758, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-7637, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#563237203f3a377b343a39393b3b16332e22243778383f32323d78383f3e78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1b5b0a7b8bdb0fcb3bdbebebcbc91b4a9a5a3b0ffbfb8b5b5baffbfb8b9ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 26, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-27569 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHARLES JEFFERY WALKER,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-0866

LT Case No. 2022-311437-MMDB

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed July 11, 2023

Appeal from Circuit Court

for Volusia County,

Brian A. Feigenbaum, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and

Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee,

and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, LAMBERT and SOUD, JJ., concur.
v4 (4/23/2014) Complies with USCIS Form I-9(Rev. 03/08/13 N)

I-9 Documents required to obtain a NASA Federal Credential / Photo 

Identification Badge.

Two identity sources are required. All documents must be UNEXPIRED.

One must be a valid Federal or State government issued picture identification. The other 

identity source must be one of the following documents:

List of Acceptable Documents to Accompany a Federal or State Photo Identification

1. U.S. Passport or U. S. 

Passport Card

2. Permanent Resident Card or 

Alien Registration Receipt 

card (Form I-551) 

3. An Foreign Passport that 

contains a Temporary I-551 

stamp or temporary I-551 

printed notation on a 

machine-readable immigrant 

visa 

4. An Employment 

Authorization Document that 

contains a Photograph 

(Form I-766) 

5. For a nonimmigrant alien 

authorized to work for a 

specific employer because of 

his or her status: a foreign 

passport with an Unexpired 

Arrival-Departure Record, 

(Form I-94 or I-94A), bearing 

the same name as the passport 

and containing an 

endorsement of the alien’s 

nonimmigrant status, so long 

as that period of endorsement 

has not yet expired and the 

proposed employment is not 

in conflict with any 

restrictions or limitations

identified on the form.

6. Unexpired Driver’s License or 

ID Card issued by a state or 

outlying possession of the 

United States provided it 

contains a photograph or 

information such as name, 

date of birth, gender, height, 

eye color and address 

7. Unexpired ID card issued by 

United States federal, state or 

local government agencies or 

entities, provided it contains a 

photograph, or information 

such as name, date of birth, 

gender, height, eye color and 

address 

8. U.S. School ID card with 

a photograph

9. U.S. Voter’s 

Registration Card

10. U.S. Military

Dependent’s ID Card

11. U.S. Military card or 

draft record

12. U.S. Coast Guard 

Merchant Mariner Card

13. Native American Tribal 

Document 

14. Unexpired Driver’s 

License Issued by a 

Canadian government 

authority

15. U.S. Citizen ID Card

(Form I-197) 

16. ID Card for use of 

Resident Citizens of the 

United States (Form 

I-179) 

17. Passport from the 

Federated States of 

Micronesia (FSM) or the 

Republic of the 

Marshall Islands (RMI) 

with Form I-94 or I-94A 

indicating 

nonimmigrant 

admission under the 

Compact of Free 

Association Between the 

U.S. and the FSM or 

RMI 

18. U.S. Social Security 

Card issued by the 

Social Security 

Administration (other 

than a card stating it is 

not valid for 

employment) 

19. Certification of Birth or 

Birth Abroad issued by 

the Department of State 

(Form FS-545 or Form 

DS-1350)

20. Original or Certified 

copy of birth certificate

issued by a state, 

county, municipal 

authority or outlying 

possessions of the 

United States bearing 

an official seal

21. Unexpired employment 

authorization document 

issued by DHS 

U.S. CITIZENS UNDER 18

YEARS OF AGE MAY

PROVIDE:

22. School Record or report 

card

23. Clinic, Doctor, or 

Hospital Record

24. Day-care or Nursery 

School Record
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 2181 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 001620

- A

_____________________________ S HAME IL S MITH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Lindsay Tygart , Judge

.
Shameil Smith
, Milton
, pro se

. No Appearance for Appelle e

. October 17, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
H ARRIS , B OATWRIGHT , and P RATT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10611 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Sergio Martinez Zapata,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:22
- CR
- 84 - 1

**_______________ _______________**  Before **Higginbotham, Stewart,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Sergio Martinez Zapata has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zapata has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 15, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10611 Document: 00517066191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2024No. 23
- 10611

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10611 Document: 00517066191 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1929 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1929

 To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the 
 Public Health Service Act to extend the mental health benefits parity 
                   provisions for an additional year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2003

Mr. Gregg (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the 
 Public Health Service Act to extend the mental health benefits parity 
                   provisions for an additional year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mental Health Parity Reauthorization 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MENTAL HEALTH PROVISIONS.

    (a) ERISA.--Section 712(f) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1185a(f)) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
    (b) PHSA.--Section 2705(f) of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300gg-5(f)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
                                 <all>
```
DM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0291

CITY OF RED LODGE,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

EUGENE TIMOTHY RODMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 24, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0291
#### Solomon Bright *v.*Robert Sanford et al.

Covenant — Notice to Subsequent Purchasers Under.

Where land is conveyed in covenant of warranty by a bond for title, reserving the legal title in the covenantor, it is both notice and binding on subsequent purchasers as privies.

APPEAL EROM ERANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 19, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

Bright purchased some fifteen acres of land from Harrad and took his title bond, he afterward sold this land to Sanford and executed his title bond to convey when all the purchase money should be paid, which was secured by notes for different amounts due at different times. Sanford sold the land to Shannon and executed his title bond to convey, etc., and Shannon sold this with some other land to defendant Marshall who now has it in possession.

Bright assigned the note for $50, due March 1, 1852, executed by Sanford, to Brooker, who obtained judgment, execution, and a return of *nulla bona*against Sanford, after which Bright paid his assignee, and thus again became the owner of the debt.

Bright filed this petition to assert his lien on the land for this $50 debt and another one for $25, both being part of the purchase price.

He avers he has the legal title, and is ready to convey, etc., and prays a sale, etc.

Marshall resists the lien, denies that either it or the debts still exist; says Bright has wrongfully obtained the legal title from his vendor, since he sold the land to Sanford, and by cross-petition asks the court to adjudge him the title. The court dismissed Bright’s petition because *“*plaintiff has failed to allege or show *187that defendant Shannon and his vendee, Marshall, had notice of his lien when Shannon purchased of Sanford, or Marshall purchased of Shannon.” The court evidently misapprehended the law.

Had Bright conveyed the legal title without specifying the unpaid purchase price he would have had no lien as against subsequent purchasers, by virtue of our statute, but this is not the case; he only gave his covenant to convey when the therein enumerated debts were paid; this being the only muniment of title from him, its statements and covenants must be regarded as both notice and binding on subsequent purchasers as privies. Bright rightfully obtained the legal title; indeed it may be regarded as part of his covenant to Sanford, as he bound himself to convey the land on payment.

As he was rightfully invested with the legal title he cannot be divested of it until Sanford complies with his covenants, and those claiming under Sanford stand in no better attitude than he would.

Bright’s petition substantially seeks a specific execution of the contract, and he is entitled to this, as against Sanford and all claiming under him; he was entitled to a judgment for the .unpaid purchase money.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, with directions for further proceedings conformable hereto.
Exhibit 35.1

EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-3, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as
Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on August 13, 2014 and ending on February 28, 2015 and of the Servicers performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made
under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing
Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers
Certificate this 22nd day of May, 2015.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT (23)





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have issued our report, dated February 25, 2010, accompanying the consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-43426, effective August 10, 2000), and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-46860, effective September 28, 2000).











/s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP











Atlanta, Georgia


February 25, 2010
Look Up Boarding Pass What is Artemis? En Español


Sign Up Look Up Boarding Pass What is Artemis? En Español


DID YOU GET YOURS?


Your name will fly around the **Moon!**
 LOOK UP BOARDING PASS
 Artemis I will be the first uncrewed flight test of the Space Launch System rocket and the Orion spacecraft. The flight paves the way toward landing the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon! **We’ve finished collecting names for Artemis I and are working on loading them onto the Orion spacecraft! If you’ve submitted your name, it is included on a flash drive that will fly aboard Orion on Artemis I later this year.  Artemis Website for updates and stay tuned for launch of the mission, or sign up for the newsletter to receive NASA updates in your inbox.**
 **Enter your name and a custom pin to generate your boarding pass. Remember your pin. You will need it to access your boarding pass in the future.**   Already signed up? Search for your account.
 **Enter your name and pin to display our boarding pass.**  **Don't remember your pin? NASA is unable to recover a lost pin, but you can download a blank boarding pass and enter your name.**
 Thank you for signing up to fly your name on Artemis I. 
                    Click the image below to download your boarding pass.
                    To reset the boarding pass and register again, click HERE.
 
 
 Join NASA as a Virtual Guest For Artemis I and Stay Informed! X
 All eyes will be on the historic Launch Complex 39B when Orion and the Space Launch System (SLS) lift off for the first time from NASA's modernized Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The mission will demonstrate our commitment and capability to extend human existence to the Moon and beyond. Artemis I will be the first in a series of increasingly complex missions to build a long-term human presence at the Moon for decades to come.
 ORION
                The spacecraft
 SLS
                The rocket
 EGS
                The launch complex
 Artemis I
                The mission
 National Aeronautics and Space Administration
      NASA Official: Brian Dunbar
#### Anthony SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABC RENTAL SYSTEMS OF NEW ORLEANS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 78-3180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 1980.

Robert Hugh Matthews, Patrick D. Breeden, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

MeGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz & Hoffman, David S. Willenzik, Leopold Z. Sher, B. Franklin Martin, III, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before MORGAN, CHARLES CLARK and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court correctly held that the transaction which formed the basis of plaintiff-appellant’s claim in this action was not covered by the Consumer Leasing Act of 1976 (15 U.S.C. § 1667) and section 226.15 of Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226.15), or the Truth-in-Lending Act (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) and section 226.8 of Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226.8).

The judgment appealed from is

AFFIRMED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

         As of and for the year ended March 31, 2000, pursuant to Section 8.16
of the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement, the undersigned  on behalf of Centex
Credit Corporation  has performed the reviews of the activities of the Servicer
during such preceding fiscal year and of performance under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, for Centex Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-3 under my
supervision.

         To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the Servicer has
fulfilled  all  obligations  under the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement for the
fiscal year above referenced.

Anthony H. Barone
President
#### Wonderly *v.*Nokes.—In error.

ACTION of slander for charging the plaintiff with larceny. Pleas, not guilty, and a justification alleging the words to be true. On the trial the'Court instructed the jury as follows: “The testimony,to sustain that plea (the justification), should be as certain and conclusive as would be required to justify a conviction for the larceny, if the plaintiff were indicted for *590the ofience — such as leaves no rational doubt in the minds of . the jury of the truth of the charge.” The defendant objected to this instruction. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed (1).

1

(1) See *Byrket*v. Monohon, 7 Blackf. *83.*— Lanter v. *M'Ewen,*ante, 495. In an action for libel, *Tindal,*C. J., in charging the jury said: “We cannot consider the plea (of justification) in any other way, or on any other kind of evidence, than if we were trying the plaintiff for the offence alleged in it.” *Chalmers*v. *Shackell,*6 C. & P. 475. In a subsequent case, *Denman,*C. J., in charging the jury said: “The first plea of the defendants is a plea of justification of so much of the libel as imputes the crime of bigamy to the plaintiff; and I think that on this plea of justification, you'should have the same strictness of proof as on a trial for bigamy.” *Willmett*v. *Harmer,*8 C. & P. 695. In an action of slander, the defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that he should justify speaking the words by proving them to be true. On the trial, he gave evidence tending to prove the truth of the words. The judge instructed the jury that if they were satisfied that the defendant made the charge against the plaintiff, which >vas alleged in the declaration, they should find a verdict for the plaintiff, unless, upon the whole evidence, they were satisfied that the charge was true; that the burden of proof was on the defendant to establish that fact; and that if the jury doubted as to that fact, they should find for the plaintiff. *Held,*that this instruction was correct. *Sperry*v. *Wilcox,*1 Metcalf, 267.