alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00216

- CR

Mario CASTILLO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 299th District Court, Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D

- 1

- DC

- 09

- 207014

Honorable Karen Sage, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED April 20, 2016.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
1 min read

# Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core Project Overview

### Lillian Gipson

#### Web Editor

May 18, 2022

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

The Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) project aims to develop small core turbofan engine technologies to enable fuel burn reductions, additional use of electric airplane systems through power extracted from the engine, and advance engine operability and compatibility with sustainable aviation fuels.

Turbofan engines are the heart of the subsonic transport fleet and a key focus in the Sustainable Flight National Partnership.

NASA is collaborating with industry in cost-sharing arrangements on researching key technologies that could accelerate adoption of small core technology and integrated systems for future single aisle aircraft.

Specifically, HyTEC aims to achieve:
            - Fuel burn reduction of 5 to 10 percent compared to 2020 best-in-class turbofan engines.  	 
            - Up to 20 percent power extraction at altitude, which is 2-4 times current state of the art.  	 
            - Advanced design capabilities for small core combustors to operate effectively and efficiently on high blend (80-100 percent) sustainable aviation fuels.

HyTEC Project Leadership

HyTEC

AAVP

ARMD

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

4 min readNASA, Industry to Start Designing More Sustainable Jet Engine CoreArticle										4 weeks ago									

5 min readUpdates from NASA’s HyTEC Engine Core Project Show ProgressArticle										1 year ago									

3 min readNASA, Industry Advance Jet Engines and Sustainable Fuel CompatibilityArticle										2 years ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space
Solar System Exploration
Why Oceans Matter The story of oceans is the story of life. Life as we know it requires three ingredients:...

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core
1 

Filed 12/18/13 P. v. Adger CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for 

publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Sacramento) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

ANTWAN LEE ADGER, SR., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C074029 

(Super. Ct. No. 13F00558) 

 Appointed counsel for defendant Antwan Lee Adger, Sr., asked this court to 

review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that 

would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment. 

 We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history 

of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) 

 On January 23, 2013, defendant fled from a police officer’s marked car in the 

vehicle he was driving. The police officer activated the car’s light and siren. 

Defendant drove 85 to 90 miles an hour on the freeway, over 60 miles an hour in a 

residential neighborhood, ran several red lights, and collided with a parked vehicle. 

Defendant then ran from the police into Cathy Soto’s house, where he forced her to 

stay inside and be quiet so the police would not find him. 
2 

 Defendant pled no contest to felony evading an officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, 

subd. (a)) and false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236), and admitted a prior strike. The 

trial court sentenced defendant to serve a stipulated term of five years four months in 

state prison, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded 141 days’ presentence 

custody credit (71 actual and 70 conduct). 

 Defendant appeals. His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied. 

 We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an 

opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the 

record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 

25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days 

elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. There is a mathematical 

error in the abstract of judgment that incorrectly shows 140 rather than 141 days of 

presentence custody credit. We order a correction to the abstract. 

 Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no other 

arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. 

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to prepare a corrected 

abstract of judgment reflecting an award of 141 days of presentence custody credit and 

to forward a certified copy to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. 

 HOCH , J. 

We concur: 

 HULL , Acting P. J. 

 DUARTE , J.
# Visit NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center

Welcome to NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center, one of NASA’s premiere centers for flight research and testing! NASA Armstrong is renowned for its work in aeronautics, which can be seen through all the historical aircraft that are located around the center.

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    Historical Static Aircraft

    The Entrance to NASA Armstrong

    Hangar 4802

    Mission Control Center

    Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1267 

KA 09-01350 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES ROGERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

ROBERT M. PUSATERI, CONFLICT DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (EDWARD P. PERLMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a resentence of the Niagara County Court (Sara S.

Sperrazza, J.), rendered March 18, 2009. Defendant was resentenced

upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence imposed upon

remittal of this matter to County Court. On defendant’s first appeal

in this matter, we reversed the judgment convicting him after a jury

trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]) and

robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1]), and we granted him a new

trial on the counts of the indictment charging him with those crimes

(People v Rogers, 16 AD3d 1101). On appeal from the judgment

convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree following the

retrial, we vacated the sentence on the ground that it was

presumptively vindictive, and we remitted the matter to County Court

for resentencing (People v Rogers, 56 AD3d 1173, lv denied 12 NY3d

787). Upon remittal, the court resentenced defendant to a determinate

term of imprisonment of 20 years and to five years of postrelease

supervision.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the resentence is not

vindictive. As we stated in our decision with respect to defendant’s

second appeal in this matter, “ ‘[t]he threshold issue in evaluating

whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more

severe than that originally imposed’ ” (id. at 1174; see generally

People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People

v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-161). Here, defendant’s resentence is

identical to the sentence originally imposed, and thus the presumption

of vindictiveness does not arise.
-2- 1267 

KA 09-01350 

We reject the further contention of defendant that the court

erred in resentencing him without ordering an updated presentence

report. “[T]he decision whether to obtain an updated [presentence]

report at resentencing is a matter resting in the sound discretion of

the sentencing [court]” (People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282). Here, the

court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order an updated

report inasmuch as defendant had been incarcerated since the original

sentence was imposed (see People v Brinson, 298 AD2d 870, lv denied 99

NY2d 533), and defendant presented favorable information concerning

his behavior while incarcerated. Finally, the sentence is not unduly

harsh or severe.

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# STS-53 view of OV-103’s payload bay (PLB), the Moon, and Earth’s surface

STS053-105-002 (2-9 Dec. 1992) --- A crew member onboard the space shuttle Discovery used a 70mm camera to capture this scene of a full Moon backdropped against the blackness of space. Part of Discovery's aft cargo bay and clouds over an ocean complete the scene.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts053-105-002/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenDecember 9, 1992ProducerJSCSize1909x1920pxPIA NumberSTS053-105-002The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                      Ending
Class            Interest        Principal          Losses            Balance
<S>               <C>               <C>               <C>                <C>
B1               158584.3         28216.78                0        27157664.07
B2               62967.29         11203.72                0        10783188.51
B3               46642.46          8299.06                0         7987552.95
B4               25653.33          4564.48                0         4393150.13
B5               11660.61          2074.77                0         1996888.23
B6               20989.13          3539.64           194.92         3594400.78
I_A1            701712.49       1359928.04                0       144118363.61
I_A2            389374.73        388550.91                0         41176679.8
I_A3             75322.55        -75322.54                0        12987758.73
I_A4               131040                0                0           22464000
I_A5            102453.35        164182.61                0        17399249.05
I_APO                   0           3174.2                0         1635816.02
I_AR                87.39              100                0                  0
II_A1          2881192.31       3622371.14                0       490296310.23
II_APO                  0          9560.76                0         2404062.86


</TABLE>
# X-66 Sustainable Flight Demonstrator

This is the livery for the experimental X-66, the aircraft that will be produced by NASA and Boeing through the agency’s Sustainable Flight Demonstrator project. The X-66 is the first X-plane specifically focused on helping the United States achieve the goal of net-zero aviation greenhouse gas emissions, which was articulated in the White House’s U.S. Aviation Climate Action Plan.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/microsoftteams-image-81/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Aeronautics
- Sustainable Flight Demonstrator
Image CreditBoeingSize5440x3060pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 31, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Jim Banke								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

JESUS ADRIAN RUBIO-AGUILAR, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-4031

(D.C. No. 2:09-CR-00570-CW-1)

(D. of Utah)

ORDER

Before TACHA, O’BRIEN, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to dismiss and

the response filed by defense counsel. Upon consideration thereof, the

government’s motion is granted. 

The defendant filed his notice of appeal over a month after entry of

judgment and beyond the time in which to seek an extension of time from the

district court. In a criminal appeal, the defendant’s notice of appeal is to be filed

within 14 days of entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). This rule is

an “inflexible claim-processing rule[], which unlike a jurisdictional rule, may be

forfeited if not properly raised by the government.” United States v. Garduno,

506 F.3d 1287, 1291 (10th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation omitted). 

Appellate Case: 10-4031 Document: 01018380853 Date Filed: 03/09/2010 Page: 1
2

We determine that the government properly raised the issue in its motion to

dismiss. “Because the government timely objected to [the defendant’s] late notice

of appeal, this court is bound to dismiss the appeal.” Id. at 1292.

Defense counsel admits that the defendant’s notice of appeal is untimely.

The government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is

DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Ellen Rich Reiter

Deputy Clerk/Jurisdictional Attorney

Appellate Case: 10-4031 Document: 01018380853 Date Filed: 03/09/2010 Page: 2
AGREEMENT

Agreement  is  entered  into  between  Point  of View and  Medina  International
Holdings, Inc. on April 18, 2005.

Point of View (POV)  intends  to  license  the Fixed  Asset  Software  to Medina
International Holdings, Inc. (MIH) on the following terms.

1.   Term of the Licensing agreement will be three year and extended by both the
     parties every year there after upon mutually agreed terms.

2.   MIH will buy from POV  minimum  of ten units of the  software  a month at a
     cost of $250. 3. POV will supply ten units of software every month.

4.   MIH will buy the scanner from market.

5.   MIH will provide $25,000 to upgrade the software from client version to ASP
     (Web enabled).

6.   POV will  extend  MIH  three  years  licensing  agreement  from the date of
     delivery of the ASP version.

7.   MIH will commit to issue Two Hundred Forty Thousand  restricted  shares for
     three  years  licensing.  20,000  Shares  will be  released  every  quarter
     starting from May 1, 2005.

8.   The agreement covers the whole of United States and Canada.

9.   MIH has the right to sub-license to any other entity.

10.  Fax signatures are accepted for entering into agreement.

11.  MIH will have the right to cancel  the  agreement  by giving  three  months
     notice.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phanibhusan Sharma                         Daniel Medina
Point of View                              Medina International Holdings, Inc.
226 5th Cross Road,                        10088, 6th Street , Rancho Cucamonga,
II Block, Jayanagar,                       California, 91730
Bangalore, 560011                          USA
India

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM ROSE.

May *2,*1978.

Petition for certification denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 639-01

EX P ART E PA RI S RI CHARDSON, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. 17F C2390-G( 1) I N THE 319 DI STRI CT COURT T H

F ROM NUE CE S COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n

v i ct e d o f m

urder an d s en

t en ced t o f

i f t y y ears ’ i

m pri s o n m en t

. T h e

T h i rt een t h Co urt o f A

ppeal s af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n

. R ichar

ds on v. State

, 13-18- 00297-CR ( T ex

.

A pp. —Co rpus Ch

ri s t i -E di n b urg A ug. 15, 2019)( n o t des i gn at ed f o r pub l i cat i o n ). A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s

appl i cat i o n f

o r a wr i t o f h ab eas co rpus in t h e co un t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o rwarded

i t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds t h at appel l at e co un s el f ai l ed t o t i m el y i n f o rm A ppl i can t t h at h i s co n

v i ct i o n

h ad b een af

f i rm ed. Ba s ed o n t h e reco rd, t h e t ri al co urt h as det erm i n ed t h at a p p e l l a t e co un s el ’ s

perf o rm an ce was def

i ci en t an d t h at A

ppl i can t wo ul d h av e t i

m el y f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f

o r di s cret i o n ary

rev i ew b ut f

o r co un s el ’ s def

i ci en t perf o rm an ce.2

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. E x par te W ilson

, 956 S. W

. 2d 25 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 1997); E

x par te Cr

ow

,

180 S. W

. 3d 135 (T ex

. Cri

m

. A pp. 2005). A

ppl i can t m ay f i l e an o ut -o f

-t i m e pet i t i o n f o r di s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f t h e j udgm en

t o f t h e T h i

rt een t h Co urt o f Ap p eal s i

n caus e n um b er 13-18- 00297-CR.

S h o ul d A ppl i can t deci de t o f

i l e a pet i t i o n f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew, h e m us t f i l e i t wi t h t hi s C o u r t

wi t h i n t h i rt y day s f ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: Sept em b er 16, 2020

Do n o t pub l i s h
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DEXTER C . NEW SO N

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1522

LT Case No. 2009

- CF

- 000138

- A

- X

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed August 19, 2022

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Dexter C . Newson

, Crawfordville

, pro se

.

Ashley M oody , At torney General

, Tallahassee, and Re becca Rock McGuigan , Assis tan t Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent

.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall

be filed with the trial court and treat ed as t he notice of appeal from the

November 18, 2021 order denying Petitioner ’ s motion to correct illegal2

sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a ),

rendered in C ase No. 2009

- CF

- 000138

- A

- X

, in the Circuit Court in and for

Mari on County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITI ON GRANTED

.

EVANDER

, EDWARDS and EI SNAUGLE

, JJ., concu r.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, George Mappin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ George Mappin
--------------------------
George Mappin
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005