alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

February 25, 2022

General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Awards Gala Dinner on
April 27, 2022

The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (ALAA), a not-for-profit
organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold a
Awards Gala Dinner on April 27, 2022, at the Ronald Reagan Building and International
Trade Center in Washington, DC, from 5:30-10:00 p.m. AIAA is in control of the
planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. The invitation includes a
reception, dinner, and an awards ceremony.

Approximately 400 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity
of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of
the legislative branch, and representatives from academia, and industry. The estimated cost
of the event, including all food and beverages is approximately $160 per person.
Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding
various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements of a “widely
attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees —
including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role in a matter
affecting the interests of AIAA may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event for
themselves and a guest. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in
attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be,
improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or
negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination


from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees
are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual

Adam F. Greenstone
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6091

WILLIE COUVINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00931-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Couvington, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Couvington seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as untimely and procedurally defaulted. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When 

the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Couvington has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### D. L. Clephane *v.*B. T. Bennett.

Partnership — Suit to Settle.

If there was a partnership between the parties, the action should have been brought in equity and not at law.

APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

June 25, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters :

This is an action in ordinary brought by appellant against appellee on an account for goods, and merchandise, hay, rye, shirts, barley, gas fixtures, and lumber sold, and delivered by him to appellee, and for money lent and advanced to, paid, laid out, and expended for him, amounting to the sum of $637.35.

*453On the trial no proof was introduced tending to establish an indebtedness in the manner charged in the petition; indeed, there was no evidence of an indebtedness on any account whatever, but there was evidence that appellee had contracted to improve a street in Newport, and had received therefor at different times specified sums of money, and had received as the last installment the sum of $1,087.43, and there was some evidence conducing to show that he had said appellant was his partner in the contract to improve said street. But whether he had advanced any money or performed any labor, or service, or was entitled to receive anything for advancements, or by way of profits he wholly failed to show. If there was in fact a partnership between the parties in relation to the improvement of the street, the action was not in the proper form to settle and adjust the accounts of the partners, and we perceive no error in the ruling of the court on the subject of instructing the jury.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27270]



[[Page 66421]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35434]


HC Railroad, LLC--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Honey 
Creek Railroad, Inc.

    HC Railroad, LLC (HC), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of 
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from the Honey Creek Railroad 
(HCR), and to operate 6.4 miles of HCR's rail line, extending from 
milepost 17.4 to milepost 23.8,\1\ in Rush County, Ind.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The line connects with CSX Transportation at Rushville, 
Ind., near milepost 23.8.
    \2\ HC states that the subject trackage only serves one shipper, 
Morristown Grain Company, Inc., which will be separately purchased 
by an affiliate of HC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or after November 
11, 2010 (30 days after the exemption was filed).
    HC certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not result in HC becoming a Class II or Class I rail 
carrier. HC further certifies that its projected annual revenues upon 
becoming a Class III carrier will not exceed $5 million.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. 
Petitions to stay must be filed no later than November 4, 2010 (at 
least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 35434, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each 
pleading must be served on Andrew P. Goldstein, McCarthy, Sweeney & 
Harkaway, P.C., 1825 K Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20006.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: October 25, 2010.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-27270 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          373,661
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   23,755
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     2,548,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,219,990
<PP&E>                          3,136,238
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1,291,255)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,610,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,922,237
<BONDS>                         563,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        4,900
<OTHER-SE>                      3,031,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,036,156
<SALES>                         13,453,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                13,453,168
<CGS>                           4,509,911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,886,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (148,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                100,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              92,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,012,392
<INCOME-TAX>                    531,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             630,874
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    630,874
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.13




</TABLE>
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1705
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

Lockheed Martin Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912DY-10-D-0042 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58757 

Marcia G. Madsen, Esq. 

Cameron S. Hamrick, Esq. 

Mayer Brown LLP 

Washington, DC 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Steven W. Feldman, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 

Huntsville Center 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 2 January 2014 

ARKN. STEMPER 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58757, Appeal of Lockheed Martin 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration 

Headquarters 

Washington, DC 20546-0001 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group 

TO: Distribution 

November 6, 2019 

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees 

at the Third Women in STEM Roundtable on November 7, 2019 

On November 7, 2019, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and 

Bowie State University (BSU) will host a roundtable discussion event at the BSU's 

campus in Bowie, Maryland from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The roundtable, for which 

NASA is a secondary sponsor, is to discuss strategies and techniques to advance 

cultural change within respective organizations to create workplace environments 

conducive to supporting and sustaining women in science, technology, engineering and 

mathematics (STEM) roles. 

Over 1000 people are invited, including representatives from government, academia, 

industry, non-profit organizations and local businesses. The estimated value of the food and 

beverages to be provided at the event is approximately $40 per person. I find that the event 

meets the requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. 

§ 2635.204(g). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA 

personnel attend the event because it will further Agency discussions and programs. 

Attendance at the event will allow NASA representatives to exchange views, ideas, 

achievements, lessons learned, and best practices with others in attendance. Accordingly, 

NASA employees whose duties do not substantially affect SAIC or BSU, with the exceptions 

noted below, may accept a free invitation to the roundtable. 

However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13 770 may only attend if they reimburse the hosts the value of 

the event. Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter 

affecting the interests of SAIC or BSU, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation under the 

widely attended gathering exception. NASA employees not covered by this determination 

may also attend without reimbursing the hosts if they are a scheduled roundtable speaker. 

<2/Z-{;LAdam F. Greenstone
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stanley Alexander, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HFB Financial
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
      date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            (c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
      internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
      for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
      controls; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date November 7, 2003


By /s/ Stanley Alexander, Jr.
   -----------------------------
   Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED JULY
31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                       881
<INVENTORY>                                    194,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,117<F1>
<PP&E>                                         117,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,014<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,278
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,014
<SALES>                                        175,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,005
<CGS>                                          129,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    531
<INCOME-TAX>                                       202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02<F5>
<FN>
<F1>OTHER CURRENT ASSETS 8,012
<F2>OTHER ASSETS 1,704
<F3>LONG TERM DEBT 36,944
<F4>DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 1,158
<F5>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE
OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>



</TABLE>
# Simulated Lunar Operations Laboratory (SLOPE)

The SLOPE Lab is a unique indoor laboratory designed to mimic lunar and planetary surface operations.  The lab contains several large soil bins for rover testing, including an adjustable tilt-bed, as well as equipment for evaluating the performance of tires, excavation tools and other vehicle components.  Research here helps NASA develop the tools and technologies needed to allow rovers to traverse long distances and explore the surfaces of the Moon and Mars. Click on the arrows or any of the icons to learn more about how we research planetary mobility.

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    SLOPE: Lab

    SLOPE: Rover Tires

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,367,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,639,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,478,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,888,086
<PP&E>                                      89,971,867
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,969,705)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,434,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,342,154
<BONDS>                                      7,312,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,066,155
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,439
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,307,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,434,656
<SALES>                                      7,391,659<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,391,659<F1>
<CGS>                                        5,427,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,069,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (63,281)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (755,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (253,083)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (502,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (502,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
<FN>
<F1>Sales and Total Revenues are net of federal and state excise taxes.
</FN>


</TABLE>
ORDER

#### In the Matter of STEVEN S. EZON, an attorney at law.

May 12, 1987.

STEVEN S. EZON of EAST BEUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, having tendered his consent to a disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is OEDEEED that STEVEN S. EZON of EAST BEUNSWICK is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

OEDEEED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

OEDEEED that respondent continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended and disbarred attorneys.