alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

December 17, 2021

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Aero Club
Wright Brothers Memorial Trophy Awards Dinner on December 17, 2021

On December 17, 2021, the Aero Club, a nonprofit organization under section 501(c)(6) of the
Internal Revenue Code, will host an awards dinner at the Downtown Marriott Renaissance Hotel,
Washington, DC, starting at 6:30 p.m. The Aero Club is in control of the organizing, planning
and sending of invitations to this event. The event honors the National Aeronautics
Association’s Wright Brothers Memorial Trophy recipient Charles Bolden for “... his
impassioned commitment to public service in aviation and aerospace as an aviator, astronaut, and
leader and his dedication to excellence for the advancement of all humanity.”

Approximately 400 people are expected to attend this event. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, representatives of the
U.S. legislative branch, state and local officials, representatives from the media, academia,
industry, and international partner organizations. The estimated value of the dinner, including all
food and drinks, is approximately $110 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA
attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs with attendees from other
organizations. I find that these event meets the requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as
defined in 5 C.F.R. §2635.204(g). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having
NASA personnel attend these events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited
persons to exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations.

NASA employees — including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to
sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role ina
matter affecting the interests of the Aero Club may accept an invitation for free attendance for
themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, | find that the Agency’s interest in
attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly
influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees whose duties have a significant role in any matter affecting the
interests of the Aero Club, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating a


Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as
to whether they may accept the invitation for free attendance. Attendees are also reminded to
exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation.

bh

Adam F. Greenstone
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ENRIQUE MALDONADO.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanisms and Prevention of Sexual 
Transmission of HIV/SIV.
    Date: November 17-18, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Raymond R. Schleef, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-3679, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4330202b2f2626253131032d2a222a276d2d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81f2e2e9ede4e4e7f3f3c1efe8e0e8e5afefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 15, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26498 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Thayer *v.*Dove.—On appeal.

SUIT commenced before a justice of the peace. The summons was returnable on the 6th of *June,*1846, and was served on the 4th of that month. The defendant moved for a dismissal of the suit, on the ground that the service of the summons was insufficient. This motion being overruled, the defendant moved for and obtained a continuance. The cause, on the day to which it was continued, was tried, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, and there moved for a dismissal of the suit on the same ground on which his motion to dismiss, *568before the justice, was made; and the motion was sustained. *Held,*that the defendant, by moving for and obtaining said continuance, waived the objection as to the service of the summons. Judgment reversed. See *Wibright*v. *Wise,*4 Blackf. *137.*— Early v. *Patterson, id. 449.*— Rittenour v. *M‘Causland,*5 *id. 540.*— Dudley v. *Fisher,*7 *id.*553. — R. S. 1843, p. 866.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 30, 2018By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2018
#### JANINA TEVIS v. MICHAEL TEVIS, JR.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 155 *N. J. Super.*273)
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-2236V

UNPUBLISHED

ALDEN HARMON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 2, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Human Papillomavirus 

(HPV) Vaccine; Influenza (flu) 

vaccine; Vasovagal Syncope

Theodore G. Pashos, Pashos Law, LLC, St. Charles, MO, for Petitioner.

Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On November 30, 2021, Alden Harmon filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a syncopal episode upon receiving 

Gardasil and influenza (“flu”) vaccines on September 17, 2020, which resulted in “injuries 

to his chin and jaw”. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 1, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 

1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that “[P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in

the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Interpretation (“QAI”)”. Id. at 2-3 (citing 42 C.F. R. § 100.3(a)(XIV)(C), (c)(13). Respondent 

further agrees that Petitioner experienced more than six months of residual effects . Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### Root and Another *v.*Monroe.—In error.

*Tuesday, June*29.

IF it appear by the recital in the condition of the bond in foreign attachment that the writ had issued before the bond was filed, and there ,be nothing in 'the record to show that the bond had been previously filed, -the attachment .will be quashed. *Summers*v. *Glancey,*3 Blackf. 361.

A motion to quash such writ, made on the calling of the cause at the term at which the writ was returnable, and on the first appearance of the defendant in Court, is in *time,*though he had previously entered special bail in vacation in the clerk’s-office. *Blaney*v. *Findley et al.,*2 Blackf. 338.—R. S. 1838, p. 80.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LARRY LOPEZ, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-2062

(D.C. No.6:06-CV-01254-BB-RLP )

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2062 Document: 01018437447 Date Filed: 06/09/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 99.2

                        ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED (SERVICER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

         The  undersigned,  a duly authorized  representative  of St.George Bank
Limited,  as  Servicer  ("St.George  Bank" or the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the
agreement  between  Perpetual  Trustees  Consolidated  Limited,  St.George  Bank
Limited  and  Crusade  Management  Limited,  dated as of  March  25,  2003  (the
"Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       Capitalized  terms  used  but not  defined  in this  Officer's
                  Certificate  have their  respective  meanings set forth in the
                  Agreement,  unless the context  requires  otherwise  or unless
                  otherwise defined in the Officer's Certificate.

         2.       As of the  date  hereof,  St.George  Bank is the  Servicer  of
                  Crusade Global Trust No. 1 of 2003.

         3.       This  Officer's  Certificate  is  delivered  pursuant  to  the
                  Agreement.

         4.       A review of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during the year
                  ended  September  30,  2003 and of its  performance  under the
                  pooling and servicing agreement or similar agreements was made
                  under my supervision.

         5.       Based  on such  review,  to my  knowledge,  the  Servicer  has
                  fulfilled  its  obligations  under the pooling  and  servicing
                  agreement  or  similar   agreements   relating  to  the  Trust
                  (including  the Master  Trust Deed dated March 14,  1998,  The
                  Crusade Euro Trust  Servicing  Agreement  dated March 19, 1998
                  and the  Supplementary  Terms  Notice  dated  March 11,  2003)
                  throughout such period and, except as set forth in paragraph 6
                  below.

         6.       The following is a description  of any exceptions to paragraph
                  5 above:- No significant deficiencies were detected.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of the
Servicer,  has duly executed this Officer's  Certificate this 24th day of March,
2004.


                                   ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED
                                   as Servicer


                                   By:    /s/ G.M. Bartlett
                                       -----------------------------
                                   Name:    G.M. Bartlett
                                   Title:   Group Executive
EXHIBIT 11.2

                COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Nine Months Ended          Three Months Ended
                                                     June  30,                   June  30,
                                           --------------------------   ------------------------
                                               1997           1996         1997          1996
                                           -----------     ----------   ----------    ----------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>          <C>           <C>       
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                        13,439,041     11,516,782   13,845,082    11,868,540
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
  Stock Options                                594,287        595,180      585,235       576,911
  Warrants                                        -            53,074         -           44,674
  Preferred Stock                                 -           888,889         -          660,000
                                           -----------     ----------   ----------    ----------
Weighted average shares
    outstanding                             14,033,328     13,053,925   14,430,317    13,150,125
                                           ===========     ==========   ==========    ==========
Net Income                                 $ 5,103,191     $3,794,364   $1,098,026    $1,776,692
                                           ===========     ==========   ==========    ==========


Fully Diluted Earnings
    Per Share                              $      0.36     $     0.29   $     0.08    $     0.14
                                           ===========     ==========   ==========    ==========
</TABLE>

     All share amounts and per share data have been restated to reflect the
     two-for-one stock split effected as a stock dividend on May 28, 1996.
                                       21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS EXHIBIT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS
EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE
SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY
OTHER FILING WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER
FILING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,272
<INVENTORY>                                     41,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,168
<PP&E>                                          90,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,957
<BONDS>                                        110,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,267
<SALES>                                         64,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,781
<CGS>                                           44,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,390)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,129)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
# STS-124 and Expedition 17 crew portrait

S124-E-007905 (9 June 2008) --- The STS-124 and Expedition 17 crewmembers pose for a group portrait following a joint news conference from the newly installed Kibo Japanese Pressurized Module of the International Space Station while Space Shuttle Discovery is docked with the station. From the left (front row) are NASA astronauts Karen Nyberg, Garrett Reisman, both STS-124 mission specialists; Mark Kelly, STS-124 commander; Russian Federal Space Agency cosmonaut Sergei Volkov, Expedition 17 commander; and NASA astronaut Mike Fossum, STS-124 mission specialist. From the left (back row) are NASA astronaut Ron Garan, STS-124 mission specialist; Russian Federal Space Agency cosmonaut Oleg Kononenko, Expedition 17 flight engineer; NASA astronauts Ken Ham, STS-124 pilot; Greg Chamitoff, Expedition 17 flight engineer; and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency astronaut Akihiko Hoshide, STS-124 mission specialist. Reisman, who joined the station's crew in March, is being replaced by Chamitoff, who arrived at the station with the STS-124 crew.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s124e007905/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 9, 2008ProducerJSCSize1920x1275pxPIA Numbers124e007905The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman