alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# The Soyuz spacecraft departs the International Space Station

ISS003-E-7122 (31 October 2001) --- Backdropped by Earth’s horizon and the blackness of space, a Soyuz spacecraft undocks from the International Space Station (ISS) carrying the Soyuz taxi crew, Commander Victor Afanasyev, Flight Engineer Konstantin Kozeev and French Flight Engineer Claudie Haignere, ending their eight-day stay on the station. Afanasyev and Kozeev represent Rosaviakosmos, and Haignere represents ESA, carrying out a flight program for CNES, the French Space Agency, under a commercial contract with the Russian Aviation and Space Agency. This image was taken with a digital still camera.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss003e7122-9505905312-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize3060x2092pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Dec 19, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 10591 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Alfonso Butler, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22

- CR

- 11

- 1

Before **Stewart, Duncan,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfonso Butler, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Butler has filed a response. T o the extent he raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel , t he record is not sufficiently

* This opinion is not d esignated for publication. See 5th Ci r . R

. 47.5

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 7, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10591 Document: 00516570315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2022No. 22

- 10591

2 developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Butler ’ s claim ; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to coll ateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel ’ s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Butler ’ s response. We concur with counsel ’ s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 22-10591 Document: 00516570315 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2022
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **6 08**  **1**

LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG , P laintiff

- Appell ant ,

v. D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer; DURANKO, S.I.S. Technician; D. SHAW, Lieutenant; UNKNOWN MAIL ROOM PERSONNEL; D. YO ST, I.S.O. , Defendant s – Appell ees .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , Chief District Judge. ( 2 : 1 0

- c v - 0 0 066

- J P B

- JSK )

Submitted : May 2 6 , 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING , SHEDD, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Larry Arnold Young , Appellant Pro Se
. Rita R. Valdrini , Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee s .
Unpublished opini ons are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Arnold Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his motion for entry of default judgment

. This cour t may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The
order You ng seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
-  Home 
    -                   About the Library              

# About the Library

## Welcome to NAL

The National Agricultural Library (NAL) facilitates the creation of agricultural knowledge through the acquisition, curation, and dissemination of the information needed to solve agricultural challenges today and in the future.

## Hours

**Main Library**

Monday - FridayOpen 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM*Closed on Federal holidays* 

**NAL's Special Collections**

Monday - Friday8:30 AM to Noon1:00 PM to 4:00 PM*Closed on Federal holidays*Schedule an appointmentEmail special.collections@usda.gov orcall: 301-504-5755 or 1-800-633-7701

## Location

The National Agricultural Library is one of five national libraries of the United States and houses one of the world's largest collections devoted to agriculture and its related sciences.

The Library's convenient location is 15 miles northeast of Washington, DC, near the intersection of U.S. Route 1 and Interstates 95 and 495 (Beltway Exit 25-North).
> 
National Agricultural Library10301 Baltimore AvenueBeltsville, MD 20705

## Contact Us

- Ask A Question 
- Key Personnel and Services 
- Organization Chart 
- Program Areas 
- Staff Directory 

## Join our Team

-  Internships 
-  Open Positions (USAJobs)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 of Sport
Chalet, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report. Date:
  August 11, 2005/s/
  Craig L. LevraChairman of the Board,
  Chief Executive Officer and President/s/
  Howard K. KaminskyExecutive Vice
  President-Finance,
  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sport Chalet,
Inc and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. 29
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER BECHTOLD, DECEASED.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 156 *N. J. Super.*194)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Josie
Ben Rubi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to OCTuS, Inc., and will be retained by OCTuS, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Josie Ben Rubi
--------------------------
Josie Ben Rubi
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2006
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Priority and Schedule of Commercial Crew Development 

2013-02-02 (HEOC-02) 

Recommendation: 

Timely establishment of a commercial capability to deliver U.S. astronauts to low earth 

orbit is essential to reduce undesirable reliance on a single non~U.S. provider, Soyuz. 

The Council is concerned that projected funding levels for commercial crew development 

may be insufficient to provide a safe and robust capability by the target date of 2017. 

NASA should develop and clearly articulate a plan for establishment ofthis capability 

that requires a demonstrated critical look at safety, and that addresses realistic funding 

levels, the contractor downselect process, and traceable milestones and target dates for 

initial operating capability. We request a briefing on this topic at the next NASA 

Advisory Council meeting. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

Rapid establishment ofU.S. commercial crew transportation to ISS is critically important 


to NASA's human space program. There has been a significant shortfall in Commercial 


Crew Program funding over the past three years, typically -40% less than requested, and 


this shortfall may continue. Safely achieving the required capability on the desired 


schedule in such a funding environment will be challenging, and it is not clear to the 


Council that NASA has a self-consistent plan in place. 


Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 


Increased risk to ISS due to dependency on a single source provider for crew transport to 


and from the ISS. 


NASA Response: 


NASA concurs with this recommendation. The mismatch between requested and 


appropriated funds for the program over the past three years has posed planning and 


implementation challenges; however, NASA's basic strategy remains intact. The 


Commercial Crew Program partners are working to accomplish a set of agreed-to 


milestones under Commercial Crew integrated Capability (CCiCAP) Space Act 


Agreements. In parallel, they have provided draft certification products for NASA's 


review under Certification Products Contracts (CPC), and NASA is providing feedback 


on these draft products for a second round of delivery. These CPC products will enable 


the partners to provide higher quality proposals in response to the Commercial Crew 


Transportation Capability (CCtCAP) request for proposals to be released this fall. 


Knowledge ofthe contents ofthese proposals and ofthe final FY2014 appropriation level 


will allow NASA to further refine its expectations and plans for commercial crew 


transportation. NASA will provide the requested briefing at the next NASA Advisory 


Council meeting. 


Enclosure
*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 22, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

TRIGINAL D. JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 09-2159

v. (D. New Mexico)

WALGREENS CORP.; MS. FALLAS;

3 CLERKS; 3 MANAGERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 09-CV-00286-BB-DJS)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, SEYMOUR, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Triginal Jackson, pro se, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis to appeal

the district court’s dismissal, for failure to state a claim on which relief can be

Appellate Case: 09-2159 Document: 01018353775 Date Filed: 01/22/2010 Page: 1
1

The official name appears to be Walgreen Co.

2

granted, of his civil rights complaint against Walgreens Corp.,1

 and various of its

employees. Mr. Jackson filed his complaint on a form for 42 U.S.C. § 1983

actions, but his allegations also assert claims of discrimination.

According to the complaint, employees at two out of three Walgreens stores

that Mr. Jackson visited in New Mexico refused to sell him alcohol due to what

they considered to be an unacceptable form of identification issued in Utah. No

other basis for the refusal is articulated.

The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) because, for § 1983 purposes, the defendants were not state

actors, and, to the extent that the complaint invokes statutes prohibiting

discrimination, there is no federal law preventing a private business from refusing

to sell alcohol under these circumstances.

Applying the usual liberal standard to our reading of the complaint, and de

novo review of the district court’s decision, see Kay v. Bemis, 500 F.3d 1214,

1217-18 (10th Cir. 2007), we agree with the district court. Accordingly, for

substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s Opinion dated April 8, 2009,

Appellate Case: 09-2159 Document: 01018353775 Date Filed: 01/22/2010 Page: 2
3

and Orders dated April 15, 2009, and August 20, 2009, we deny leave for

Mr. Jackson to proceed ifp, and dismiss this appeal for failure to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 09-2159 Document: 01018353775 Date Filed: 01/22/2010 Page: 3
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 10, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

JAMES OLIVER REESE, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-2036

 (D.C. No. 1:09-CR-02982-JEC-1)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the appellant’s “Motion for Voluntary

Dismissal of James Oliver Reese’s Cross Appeal, No. 10-2036.” 

 The motion is granted and this cross-appeal (10-2036) is dismissed. 

 The government’s appeal (10-2030) remains pending with this court. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-2036 Document: 01018438726 Date Filed: 06/10/2010 Page: 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ERIC HOUSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN DANIALS; 

CAPTAIN HUTCHINGS,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1069

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02480-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1069 Document: 01018437829 Date Filed: 06/09/2010 Page: 1
***Exhibit
      23***





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-113224, and 333-51524, on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No.
      333-129860 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 14, 2008, relating to the
      consolidated financial statements of Pacific Financial Corporation and
      Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of Pacific Financial Corporation’s internal
      control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      Pacific Financial Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31,
      2007.





/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP





March
      14,
      2008
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 

Nutty Balloon Noisemaker

Suggested Grades: 3-8

Activity Overview

In this activity, you will see how sound waves can be 

focused to increase the volume of a noise. 

Steps

1. Sound is created when molecules vibrate (move 

back and forth). For example, if you hit a drum with a drumstick, the head of the drum 

vibrates and creates the noise you hear. Likewise, if you tap a blown up balloon, the 

balloon vibrates and a noise is created. 

2. Begin by placing the hexagonal metal nut inside the balloon as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Place the metal nut inside the balloon.

3. Blow up the balloon and tie the end to keep the air from escaping (see Figure 3). If you 

shake the balloon, you will be able to hear the nut hitting against the balloon.

Figure 2. Inflated balloon with the nut inside.

Time: 10 minutes

Materials

• Balloon

• Hexagonal metal nut

• Other small objects (optional)
4. Hold the balloon by the end as shown in Figure 3. Then, move the balloon in a 

continuous circular motion so that the nut rolls around the balloon. 

Figure 3. Move the balloon in a continuous circular motion so the nut moves around inside the balloon.

It might take a few tries getting the movement correct. You will know you are doing it 

correctly when you can hear a whirring noise.

5. Experiment by moving the balloon faster and slower. How does the noise change? 

6. You can also try doing this experiment with other objects inside the balloon instead of the 

nut. Some suggestions are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Try other items such as a coin or a die.
Background Information

Why does NASA study sound? One of NASA’s missions is to help make aircraft safer, more 

efficient, and more environmentally friendly. Part of making them more environmentally friendly 

is addressing the noise they make. The noise can impact people and animals, so NASA is working 

to reduce aircraft noise.

One example is the X-59 (QueSST), an airplane that flies faster than the speed of sound, or 

supersonic, but is much quieter than previous supersonic airplanes. In the past, supersonic flight 

created sonic booms (extremely loud noises that can damage property and affect people and 

animals). The X-59 creates a series of much quieter sonic thumps instead. The goal of the X-59 

program is to demonstrate that quiet supersonic flight is possible which will hopefully lead to the 

easing of restrictions against supersonic flight over land.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SALAM, INC., et al., Defendants, TRAVELERS EXPRESS COMPANY, INC., Claimant-Appellant.

No. 02-31114.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2003.

Thomas Landers Watson, Assistant US Attorney, Stephen A. Higginson, Assistant US Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ralph Shipley Whalen, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Movant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Travelers Express Company, Inc. (Travelers), appeals the district court’s dismissal, for lack of standing, of its third-party claim to funds seized in a criminal forfeiture. The district court dismissed the claim on the Government’s motion after discovery revealed that Travelers had been paid in full by the defendants on its claim and had assigned its rights to the funds in the seized bank accounts to the defendants. The defendants agreed to forfei*422ture of the seized funds in their plea agreements.

The record supports a determination that Travelers no longer has a facially colorable interest in the proceedings sufficient to satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and the prudential considerations that guide the federal courts’ exercise of jurisdiction. *See United States v. $321,470 in U.S. Currency,*874 F.2d 298, 302 (5th Cir.1989). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing the claim with prejudice for lack of standing.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston  Corporation
(the  "Company")  hereby  certifies,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that  the
Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarterly  period  ended
September  30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Daniel J. Dorman
---------------------------------------
Name:       Daniel J. Dorman
Title:      Principal Executive Officer
Date:       November 12, 2004

The foregoing  certification  (i)  accompanies the filing and is being furnished
solely  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  (ii) will not be  deemed  "filed"  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the
liability of that section,  and (iii) will not be deemed to be  incorporated  by
reference  into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except  to the  extent  that  the  registrant  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston  Corporation  and will be
retained by Sandston  Corporation  and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    Page 13