alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Brison *v.*Street.

A *scire facias,*issued by a justice of the peace against replevin-bail, need not aver that an execution had issued, &e. against the principal.

That the proper execution has not been issued in such case, or the return to it necessary to charge the bail has not been made, may be pleaded in bar to the *scire facias.*

*Saturday, July*11.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

A *scire facias*was issued in favour of *Street*against *Brison,*by a justice of the peace. The object of the writ was to have an award of execution against the defendant, as the bail of one *Cooper*for the stay of execution. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiff; and the defendant appealed to the Circuit Court.

A motion was made in the Circuit Court by the defendant, to set aside the *scire facias*issued by the justice, on the ground that it did not aver that an execution had issued against *Cooper;*but the motion was overruled. The defendant,'afterwards, failed to prosecute his appeal; and judgment was rendered against him for the same amount as that which had been rendered against him by the justice, with ten *per centum*thereon, and costs.

The only error assigned and relied on is, that the *scire*
      *360
      *facias*issued by th Jflfitice does not aver that an execution had issued against rare judgment-debtor. But we think that such an averment is not necessary. It is true, that there must be a return to an execution against the principal, that sufficient goods cannot be found to satisfy the execution, before a *scire facias*can issue against the bail. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 374. But it does not follow, that the *scire facias*must show that an execution had be'en so issued and returned.

*J.*Hyman, for the plaintiff.

*G. Holland,*for the defendant.

The *scire facias*against special bail on their recognizance, which is a. similar case to that before us, does not aver that a *capias ad satisfaciendum*against the principal had been returned *non est*inventus, though such a return is necessary to be made before the bail can be charged. Tidd’s Prac. Forms.

If, in such cases, the proper execution has not been issued, or the return to it necessary to charge the bail has not been made, those matters are a good defence, and may be pleaded in bar to the *scire facias.*2 Saund. 72 s.—3 Chitt. Pl. 995.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.5 WARREN RESOURCES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
TO
ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY SERIES A INSTITUTIONAL 8% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE
PREFERRED STOCK ($.0001 PAR VALUE) Pursuant to Section 2-105 of the Maryland General Corporation Law The undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Warren Resources,
Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies to the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland (the Department) that: 1. On June 30, 2004, at 12:43 p.m., the Corporation filed with the
Department Articles Supplementary dated June 23, 2004 (the Articles
Supplementary) to the Corporations Articles of Incorporation, and the Articles
Supplementary require correction as permitted by Section 1-207 of the Maryland
General Corporation Law. 2. Section 5(a) on page 6 of the Articles Supplementary, as previously
filed, is hereby corrected to read as follows: 9. CONVERSION. (a) CONVERSION RATE. The holders of shares of the Convertible
Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert their shares into
            shares of Common Stock at the following rate of conversion (the
Conversion Rate, being the number of shares of Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of one share of Convertible Preferred
Stock), subject to adjustment as herein provided: (i) commencing one year from the date of issuance and
until June 30, 2005, one share of Common Stock for each one
share of Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) from July 1, 2005 and until June 30, 2006, 0.75
shares of Common Stock for each one share of Convertible
Preferred Stock; and (iii) from July 1, 2006 and thereafter, 0.50 shares of
Common Stock for each one share of Convertible Preferred
Stock. 3. The name of each party to the document being corrected is Warren
Resources, Inc.




---



##### 



* * * * * IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Warren Resources, Inc. has caused this Certificate of
Correction to Articles Supplementary to be executed under the seal in its name
and on its behalf by Norman F. Swanton, the Corporations President and Chief
Executive Officer, and attested to by David E. Fleming, its Corporate Secretary,
this 10th day of August, 2004. WARREN RESOURCES, INC.By:
    /s/ Norman F. SwantonNorman F. SwantonPresident and Chief Executive Officer Attest: /s/ David E. Fleming  
 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the general
partner of the  Partnership,  hereby  certify  that  hereby  certify  that to my
knowledge:


               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

November 14, 2003
Exhibit 4.2

 

[Specimen IAC Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock Certificate]

 

	
NUMBER
    	
SHARES
    


 

IAC HOLDINGS, INC.

 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

 

This Certifies that                                                 is the registered holder of                                                 Shares of the Class B Common Stock of IAC Holdings, Inc., par value $0.001 per share, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

 

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed

 

	
            this          day
    	
 
    	
of             A.D. 20
# 								Office of Small Business Programs at Langley							

Credits: NASA / Sean Smith

### Garrett Shea

### Michele Ostovar

#### NASA History Communications Lead

Apr 15, 2021

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

## Contents

              -  Center Mission 
              -  Small Business Specialist 
              -  Doing Business With LaRC 

### Center Mission

NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) works to make revolutionary improvements to aviation, expand understanding of the Earth’s atmosphere and develop technology for space exploration.

LaRC pioneers the future in space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics through research and development of technology, scientific instruments and investigations, and exploration systems.

### Small Business Specialist

**Robert O. Betts**, Small Business Specialist Phone: 757-864-6074 E-mail: larc-smallbusiness@mail.nasa.gov

### Doing Business With LaRC

The North American Industry Classification System (*NAICS*) Codes:
            - 541715 – Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
            - 561210 – Facilities Support Services
            - 541611 – Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
            - 221118 – Other Electric Power Generation
            - 541330 – Engineering Services
            - 541690 – Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
            - 336413 – Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
            - 488190 – Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
            - 332999 – All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
            - 334511 – Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

LaRC Procurement Office: https://www.nasa.gov/reference/procurement-divisions-and-offices/#LaRC

Agency Acquisition Forecast

## Learn More about Doing Business with NASA

Doing Business with NASA

Doing Business with Langley

Procurement

Technology Transfer & Spinoffs
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

March 22, 2000



DELIVERED VIA FACSIMILE AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Mory Ejabat
Zhone Technologies
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1040
Oakland, CA 94621


Dear Mory,

On behalf of Birch Telecom, I am pleased and excited to offer you the position
of Member of the Board.

The position's term length will be initially one year and thereafter three years
if Birch adopts a staggered Board structure. If Birch does not adopt a staggered
Board structure, all terms will be one-year terms. Additional details of the
offer are as follows:

o        An annual retainer fee in the amount of $5,000 and expense
         reimbursement for Board meetings.

o        An initial grant of 30,000 stock options to be made at the exercise
         price of $7.50 per share. This grant has a four-year vesting schedule.

o        An initial grant of 10,000 stock options to occur at the time of an
         Initial Public Offering (exercise at IPO strike price).

o        Yearly grants of 5,000 stock options made each year at the time of the
         annual meeting.

o        You have agreed to purchase $500,000 in common shares at $7.50 per
         share. You agree to execute customary lock-up agreements with
         underwriters in connection with any public offering, and we will grant
         you registration and other rights commensurate with the rights of other
         purchasers of our capital stock.

o        Directors and officers insurance in the amount of $25,000,000.

o        You represent to us that you are an "accredited investor" as defined in
         Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 and that you are acquiring
         these shares for investment and without a view to making a
         distribution.

<PAGE>

The Board meetings are held on a quarterly basis (typically once in New York,
once in California and twice in Missouri). The remaining board meetings for 2000
are tentatively scheduled for April 26, August 16 and October 25. The upcoming
April 26 Board meeting will be held in New York.

Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing both copies in the
space provided. Retain one copy for your records and return the other in the
enclosed envelope for our files. Welcome to Birch, we're very happy to have you
aboard.

Sincerely,


David E. Scott
President and Chief Executive Officer


Offer accepted by:


/s/ Mory Ejabat
_____________________                                ________________________
Mory Ejabat                                                     Date
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-55432, No. 333-61168 and No. 333-72730) and Form S-8 (No. 333-103663, No. 333-61248, No. 333-54976, No. 333-52634, No. 333-47020, No. 333-92619 and No. 333-81492) of SonicWALL, Inc. of our reports dated January 27, 2003, except as toNote 13, which is as of March 17, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 28, 2003
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW VITO SOLAZZO, a/k/a

ANDREW V. SOLAZZO, a/k/a

ANDREW SOLAZZO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

JULIE MARSHALL; CORY B.

TENBRINK; SUSAN WOODARD;

CAROL KING; MARY MULLARKEY;

NANCY L. COHEN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1153

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02202-ZLW) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9) and

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1153 Document: 01018426250 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Page: 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 filed by Sport Chalet, Inc. (the
Company) on July 31, 2002 fully complied with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in such report.



|/s/ Craig L. Levra
President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- | 



|/s/ Howard K. Kaminsky
Executive Vice President  Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 



|Dated: August 9, 2002 | 
|--------------------- | 

3
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1652 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1652

To ratify the do-not-call registry provision of the Telemarketing Sales 
 Rule, as amended by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March 31, 
                                 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2003

   Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
   Schumer, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
Voinovich, and Mr. Pryor) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ratify the do-not-call registry provision of the Telemarketing Sales 
 Rule, as amended by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March 31, 
                                 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that the Federal Trade Commission was 
authorized under section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing and Consumer 
Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to compile and 
implement a national do-not-call registry.
    (b) Ratification.--The do-not-call registry provision of the 
Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 CFR 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B)), which was 
promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March 31, 2003, 
is ratified.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT #1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment #1 ("Amendment #1") to the Employment Agreement, entered into and effective as of May 25, 2018 (the "Agreement"), by and between Avid Technology,  Inc. ("Avid") and Kenneth Gayron ("Executive") is effective as of April 1,  2020  ("Amendment  Effective Date").


WHEREAS, due to the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on the economy and on Avid's current financial situation, and the implications to the organization if the COVID-19 situation continues without intervention, the parties agree to the necessity of certain cost saving measures, including the temporary reduction of certain employees' salaries; and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment #1.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


		
	1.
	As of the Amendment Effective Date, Executive agrees to a temporary twenty-three percent (23%) reduction to Executive's base salary as paid to Executive immediately prior to the Amendment Effective Date. Such reduction in salary shall subsist for a minimum period of three (3) months from the Amendment Effective Date, and for so long as Avid maintains its COVID-19-related furlough program.




		
	2.
	Other than for the purposes of the amendment set forth in §1 above, the defined term "Base Salary" shall continue to mean the salary amount paid to Executive immediately prior to the Amendment Effective Date, and shall not refer to the temporary reduced salary brought about by this Amendment #1.




		
	3.
	Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment #1, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties.




		
	4.
	Counterparts and Signature. This Amendment #1 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This amendment may be executed by electronic signature or by scanning the executed document for electronic transmittal.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement on the date above written.


	
			
	Executive
	 
	Avid Technology, Inc.

	Isl Kenneth Gayron
	 
	Isl Diana Brunelle

	Signature
	 
	Signature

	 
	 
	 

	Kenneth Gayron
	 
	Diana Brunelle

	Printed Name
	 
	Printed Name

	 
	 
	 

	Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
	 
	Chief Human Resources Officer & SVP

	Title
	 
	Title

	 
	 
	 

	May 5, 2020
	 
	April 29, 2020

	Date
	 
	Date
#### Mark Anthony GRAHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7850.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 7, 2003.

Decided Aug. 28, 2003.

Mark Anthony Graham, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Mark Anthony Graham seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his habeas petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder*
      *261
      *v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 30, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on November 25, 2002.* Because Graham failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00500

- CR

Raul Garza Salazar v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- DCR

- 01701

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 26, 2015
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141988

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141988 COA: 291862 Wayne CC: 08-018426-FC JOHN HENRY CISTRUNK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
- Images
- NASA+
- Podcasts
- e-Books
- Games and Interactives

# NASA Images

NASA has always told its story through its images, a few of which have become icons of human history.

## 

#### 

#### 

### Today

## Image Of The Day

A Moonlit Trio

The Moon, left, Jupiter, right, and Saturn, above and to the left of Jupiter, are seen after sunset with the Washington Monument, Thurs. Dec. 17, 2020, in Washington. The two planets drew closer to each other in the sky as they headed towards a “great conjunction” on Dec. 21, where the two giant planets appeared a tenth of a degree apart.

				Browse Image Archive                			

### Today

## Image Of The Day

				View image                			

## NASA HQ PHOTO: Best of 2023

The 100 best images from 2023 as captured and selected by the NASA HQ PHOTO office at NASA Headquarters in Washington.
				View Images                                     about NASA HQ PHOTO: Best of 2023

## 				NASA Image Resources			

## Images and Videos

Images, videos, and audio files from NASA's programs throughout the agency's history.

## Image and Media Guidelines

Access and use of NASA's images and media assets for educational, informational, and commercial purposes.

## NASA HQ PHOTO Office

The official Flickr account for the award-winning photography team at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

## Kennedy Space Center

The official Flickr account for the Kennedy Space Center.

## Faces of NASA

The Faces of NASA series combines stunning portraiture with interviews of NASA's workforce.

## Planetary Photojournal

Publicly released images from several solar system exploration programs.

## Earth Observatory

Images of Earth that emerge from NASA satellite missions, in-the-field research, and models.

## Training To Be An Astronaut

38 Images

Go To Gallery

Go To Gallery

## Discover More Topics From NASA

NASA Interactives

NASA Blogs

NASA Newsletters

NASA History