alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Certification of President and CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edwin R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ Edwin R. Maus
-----------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002




                                       25
1 min read

# NASA is Going Green, in Space

### Beth Ridgeway

May 20, 2019

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

*Credits:**Ball Aerospace*

A small spacecraft the size of a mini-refrigerator is packed with cutting-edge “green” technology. NASA’s Green Propellant Infusion Mission, or GPIM, will prove a sustainable and efficient approach to spaceflight. The mission will test a low toxicity propellant and compatible systems in space for the first time.  This technology could improve the performance of future missions by providing for longer mission durations using less propellant.

In this photo, a Ball Aerospace engineer performs final checks before the spacecraft shipped to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida for launch processing. GPIM is one of four unique NASA technology missions aboard the June 2019 SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch of the U.S. Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center’s Space Test Program-2 (STP-2).

*Credits:* *Ball Aerospace*
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00281-CR

EX PARTE DAVID MASON SCOTT §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 362nd District 

Court

of Denton County (F23-2654-362)

November 22, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P A U L E D W A R D S H O O K , J r ., P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. L I O N E L C . A P K E R , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 15735 D . C. N o . 4 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 2 6 4 - FRZ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona F r a nk R . Z apa t a , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P aul E dw ar d S ho ok , Jr . , a f eder alpri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2241 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED APR20 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15735 2 S h o o kc o n te n d s th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db ytr e a tin g h is c la im s o f in a d e q u a te m edi ca l care as ar i si ng un der B iv e n s v . S ixU n kn o w n Fe d. N

a r c o tic s A g e n ts , 403 U . S . 388 ( 1971) , r a the rtha n s e c t i on 2241. W e di s a gr e e . D e s pi t e the r e l i e f he s e e k s , S h o o k ’s c la im s c o n c e rn th e c o n d itio n s o f h is c o n f in e m e n t an da r e p r o p e r ly brou gh tun der B i v e ns . T h e d istrict co u rt ac tedw ith in it s d iscr etio n w h en itd ism isse dS h o o k ’s pet i t i on w i tho utprej ud i ce for f ai l ure t o com pl y w i th the court ’ s ordert o fi l e an a m e n d e dc o m p la in t. See Ferdi k v . B on ze let , 96 3 F . 2d 12 58 , 12 60 -61 (9th C i r. 19 92 ). AF F I RME D.
No. 87-6330.

#### Little *v.*Fulcomer, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The State *v.*Kesler and Another.—In error.

A PERSON may be indicted, under sect. 7, ch. 53, R. S. *J*. 1843, for an assault and battery with intent to commit murder in the second degree.
# Houston We Have a Podcast – NASA

Official National Aeronautics and Space Administration Website
#### Major Kimbraugh *v.*Leon Cuson et al.

Landlord — Tenant — Rent — Lien.

Landlords have a lien on the produce of the farm, and if sold by the tenant, are entitled to the proceeds of the sale.

APPEAL EROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 15, 1866.

Opinion

by the Court :

John Lair, as guardian of Emma A. Lair, leased for three years some sixty-one acres of land to M. M. Herme, at $2 per acre, annually, payable 1st of January each year, and took his written obligation for the same, reserving a lien on the crop; the first year’s rent was paid; about the last of November, the second year, Herme sold to Veach some $81 worth of corn, which was to be paid on the rent, and this was distinctly understood at the time of sale. December 1st, only a very few days after the delivery of the corn, Leon Cuson attached this debt, due by Veach, for an indebtedness of Herme to him.

John Lair having settled his accounts and resigned as guardian, Kimbraugh was appointed in his stead, and Lair transferred the obligation of Herme to his successor; Kimbraugh, by petition, asserted his claim to said indebtedness of Veach, which was consolidated with the suit of Cuson, and all the proper parties seem to have been before the court. John Lair’s answer is in the record, and there seems to- be no controversy as to the facts. By section Id, chapter 56 (2 Stanton Rev. Stat. 91), the landlord has a lien on the produce of the farm for one year’s rent due, not exceeding four months, or to become due; the rent was not due until January 1st, after the sale of the com and date of the attachment, consequently, the landlord’s lien existed by provision of law, independent of any stipulation of the written agreement which was simply an affirmance of the law and'in nowise *variant*from it, save that, perhaps, it attempted to give a lien for a more extended time than the statute does. Kimbraugh was not a stranger to the *364consideration of the contract between Herme and Veach, but had by law a prior lien on the corn sold which existed at the time, and the arrangement between Herme and Veach inured to the benefit of the landlord, and the money should have been adjudged to Kimbraugh, instead of to Ouson, as was done by the court below.

■ Section 13 of said chapter, Kevised Statutes, provides that the landlord’s distress or attachment shall bind *any personal estate*of the lessee found on the premises, or which may have been removed within fifteen days; this is a more extensive lien than is provided in the fourteenth section, which gives the landlord an *exclusive*lien, *only_, on the produce of the*farm, and the *personal estate which may not he acquired after he takes*possession, but on these the lien exists for four months.

■ Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions to the court below for further proceedings in accordance yrith this opinion.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40379

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCO ANTONIO OVALLE-CASTILLO, also known

as Francisco Javier Avilla-Valencia,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-845-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marco Antonio

Ovalle-Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. GarciaMendez, 420 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

1398 (2006), which held that a Texas conviction for burglary of a

habitation was equivalent to burglary of a dwelling. The
No. 06-40379

-2-

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Jeffrey BARRETT, Appellant, v. George W. BUSH, President, et al., Appellees.

No. 03-5045.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Aug. 28, 2003.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 22, 2003.

Jeffrey Barrett, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Civil Appellate and Edward Eugene Schwab, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Office of Corporation Counsel, (Appellate Division), Washington, DC, Appellees.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. *63R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 10, 2003, be affirmed. Because appellant failed to establish a violation of the First Amendment, his complaint was properly dismissed.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Caspian Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Baile, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: January 14, 2008 | By:    | John Baile                          |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                   |   | John Baile, Chief Financial Officer |
#### Wm. Lowe *v.*John Thornton’s Heirs.

Rents — Interest.

Rent after it is due carries interest like other obligations originating in contract.

Contempt — Attachment.

The mere failure to satisfy an execution or judgment when the defendant is unable to do so should not be treated- as a contempt and punished accordingly.

Same.

The party should be summoned on a rule to appear and defend or excuse the supposed contempt before the court should resort to an attachment.

APPEAL PROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

April 23, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The evidence taken before the commissioner seems to us to sustain his report of rents and waste, and the allowance of interest on the annual installments of rent is deemed proper, under all the circumstances. The third section of article 2, chapter 56, of the Kevised Statutes (2 Stant. 92) provides that “ rent after it is due shall carry interest like other liabilities originating in contract.”

The right of the chancellor to proceed by attachment to punish a party who, in contempt of his authority, willfully refuses to perform the judgments or orders of the court, is unquestionable; but ordinarily the mere failure to satisfy an execution or judgment, *9where the defendant is nnable to do so, should not in our opinion be treated as a contempt and punished accordingly. At least, the party should, on sufficient grounds shown, be summoned or ruled to appear and defend or excuse the supposed contempt before the-court should resort to attachments or orders of arrest.

Erom the transcript as certified to us by the clerk we do not feel authorized to infer that the record was not properly signed by the-special judge. It is not, therefore, necessary here to decide what may have been the effect of an omission to do so.

Wherefore, the judgment for the balance found due the appellees by the commissioner’s report is affirmed, but so much of the-judgment as awards an attachment against the appellant is reversed. As to the alleged contempt, further proceedings may be had not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### Oldham and Others *v.*M'Cormick.—In error.

TO render a bankrupt competent as a witness to increase the assets in the hands of his assignee, it must appear not only that he had no claim to a surplus of his estate, but also that he had received his allowance. *Cully*v. *Ross,*7 Blackf. 312.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1791 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1791

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 to provide that the 
amounts received by the United States under that Act shall be deposited 
            in the reclamation fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASE LOT CONVEYANCE.

    Section 4(b) of the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 (116 Stat. 
2879) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``As consideration'' and inserting the 
    following:
    ``(1) In general.--As consideration''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Use.--Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be--
            ``(A) deposited by the Secretary, on behalf of the Rio 
        Grande Project, in the reclamation fund established under the 
        first section of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C. 391); and
            ``(B) made immediately available to the Irrigation 
        Districts, to be credited in accordance with section 4(I) of 
        the Act of December 5, 1924 (43 U.S.C. 501).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Michael J. Holden, Chief Financial Officer of Newtek Business Services, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Newtek Business Services, Inc. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any chance in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 2, 2007
2 min read

# Minnesota Students to Speak with NASA Astronauts on Space Station

### NASA

Feb 16, 2018

MEDIA ADVISORYM18-033

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credits: NASA**

Students in central Minnesota will speak with NASA astronauts living, working and doing research aboard the International Space Station at 1:35 p.m. EST Tuesday, Feb. 20. The 20-minute, Earth-to-space call will air live on NASA Television and the agency’s website.

The event is being hosted by the College of Saint Benedict (CSB), in St. Joseph, Minnesota, and Saint John’s University (SJU), located in nearby Collegeville, Minnesota. Students from five area middle and high schools will travel to SJU for the call to Expedition 54 astronauts Mark Vande Hei and Scott Tingle aboard the space station, posing questions about life aboard the orbital outpost, NASA’s deep space exploration plans, and doing science in space.

Vande Hei, an SJU alumnus, arrived at the space station on Sept.12 and will return to Earth later this month. Tingle arrived Dec.19 and is scheduled to return to Earth in June.

Students across the participating school districts have been preparing for the event by studying the space station, astronaut biographies, and incorporating rockets and space station-focused physics lessons into the curriculum, as well as hosting an Engineering Design Competition. About 200 people are expected to be on-site at the university during the downlink.

Media interested in attending the event should contact Michael Hemmesch via email at             mhemmesch@csbsju.edu or phone at 320-363-2595. CSB & SJU will host the event at 2850 Abbey Plaza in Collegeville.

Linking students directly to astronauts aboard the space station provides unique, authentic experiences designed to enhance student learning, performance and interest in STEM. This in-flight education downlink is an integral component of NASA’s Year of Education on Station, which provides extensive space station-related resources and opportunities to students and educators. Astronauts living in space on the orbiting laboratory communicate with the Mission Control Center on Earth 24 hours a day through the Space Network’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (TDRS).

Follow the astronauts on social media:

See videos and lesson plans highlighting research on the International Space Station at:

-end-

Sean PotterHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1536sean.potter@nasa.govKelly HumphriesJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111kelly.o.humphries@nasa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,792
<SECURITIES>                                        13
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57
<INVENTORY>                                     17,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,906
<PP&E>                                           4,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,324
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,905
<SALES>                                         13,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,136
<CGS>                                            8,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                       532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,099
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>