alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         436,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  948,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,967,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,505,072
<PP&E>                                       4,442,410
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,895,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,122,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,326,834
<BONDS>                                      2,301,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,943,230
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    46,477,065
<OTHER-SE>                                (50,460,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,122,838
<SALES>                                      2,604,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,604,408
<CGS>                                        2,361,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,361,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               661,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,183,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,183,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,183,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0351

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ISAAC WILLIAM MACY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 7, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2023

03/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0351
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 17, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

ANTONIO ZALDIVAR,

Movant.

No. 10-4144

(D.C. Nos. 2:09-CV-00979-TC &

2:06-CR-00672-TC-3)

ORDER

Before KELLY, HARTZ, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Zaldivar seeks authorization to file a second or successive

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. He wishes

to present two claims. The first claim is “Whether the Government’s use of Rule

404(b) Amounts to Prosecutorial Misconduct.” Mot. for Auth., Attach. at 8. This

argument objects to the admission of a “trophy photo” as evidence against him. 

The second claim is “Whether the District Court’s Jurisdiction Lost the Power to

Sustain the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the Presentencing Investigation Report

Investigation (PSIR), which Contains Constitutional Errors Based on Recent

Supreme Court’s Line of Rulings Requiring Resentencing.” Id.

Appellate Case: 10-4144 Document: 01018479094 Date Filed: 08/17/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Because Mr. Zaldivar previously has pursued relief under § 2255, see

Zaldivar v. United States, No. 2:09 CV 00979 TC (D. Utah Nov. 16, 2009)

(unpublished), he is required to gain this court’s authorization before he can file

another § 2255 motion, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h), 2244(b). This court may only

grant authorization if he makes a prima face showing of “newly discovered

evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable

factfinder would have found [him] guilty of the offense,” id. § 2255(h)(1), or “a

new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by

the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable, id. § 2255(h)(2). 

Mr. Zaldivar admits that his claims involve neither new evidence nor new law. 

See Mot. for Auth. at 9, 10. In fact, he challenged the admission of the “trophy

photo” on other grounds during his direct appeal. See United States v.

Moya-Breton, 329 F. App’x 839, 843 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, Zaldivar v. United

States, 130 S. Ct. 422 (2009). And the Supreme Court decisions he cites with

regard to his second claim all predate his conviction. 

The motion for authorization is DENIED. This denial of authorization is

not appealable and “shall not be the subject of a petition for rehearing or for a 

Appellate Case: 10-4144 Document: 01018479094 Date Filed: 08/17/2010 Page: 2 
-3-

writ of certiorari.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E). 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4144 Document: 01018479094 Date Filed: 08/17/2010 Page: 3
USACE COVID-19 Response Efforts Update for April 4, 2020 John Kelly
 
   The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is working in support of the FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency - and in coordination with other federal, state, local and tribal partners – in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The latest facts and figures about our ongoing activities are contained in the following infographic (As of April 4).                 See Quad Charts for Alternate Care Sites Updated April 3, 2020.  Unit
   Facility Name
   Location
   COVID/NON-COVID
   # of Beds
   Contractor
   Contract Awarded
   Work Started
   Date Complete
   % CompleteNAD
   Javits Center Phase 1
   New York City, NY
   COVID
   1,000
   NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER OPERATING CORPORATION
   3/26/2020
   3/26/2020
   3/30/2020
   100%NAD
   Javits Center Phase 2
   New York City, NY
   COVID
   1,900
   NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER OPERATING CORPORATION
   3/26/2020
   3/30/2020
   4/8/2020
   80%NAD
   Westchester CC
   Whiteplains, NY
   COVID
   100
   HAUGLAND ENERGY GROUP LLC
   3/27/2020
   3/27/2020
   4/17/2020
   15%NAD
   SUNY Stony Brook
   Stony Brook, NY
   NON-COVID
   1,038
   TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
   3/28/2020
   3/30/2020
   4/18/2020
   26%NAD
   SUNY Westbury
   Westbury, NY
   NON-COVID
   1,022
   AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
   3/28/2020
   3/30/2020
   4/18/2020
   8%LRD
   McCormick Place
   Chicago, IL
   COVID
   3,000
   METROPOLITAN PIER AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY
   3/28/2020
   3/29/2020
   4/24/2020
   30%LRD
   Metro South Medical Ctr
   Blue Island, IL
   COVID
   350
   CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
   3/29/2020
   3/30/2020
   4/24/2020
   0%LRD
   Sherman Hospital
   Eglin, IL
   COVID
   283
   TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
   3/29/2020
   3/30/2020
   4/24/2020
   0%LRD
   TCF Center
   Detroit, MI
   COVID
   1,000
   Detroit Regional Convention/COBO Hall
   3/31/2020
   4/1/2020
   4/9/2020
   55%SPD
   Gibson Lovelace Hospital
   Albuquerque, NM
   COVID
   200
   
   4/3/2020
   TBD
   4/17/2020
   0%
 COVID19
 Alternate-Care-Sites
NASA Advisory Council

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)

Engagement Committee

AGENDA

May 12, 2020, 9:00 am – 2:00 pm ET

VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY

CHANGE in Webex and Call-In Information Below

9:00 Introduction to Meeting

• Committee Updates

Beverly Girten

Mike Kincaid

9:05 Opening Remarks by Chair Dan Dumbacher

9:10 National STEM Updates

• Federal Coordination (FC) in STEM

• STEM Advisory Panel

• COSTEM Annual Report

• Impact of Coronavirus: update and questions

What else can NASA do, what challenges are you seeing?

Mike Kincaid

9:40 Office of STEM Engagement (OSTEM) Updates

• Overview

• 2019 Highlights

Mike Kincaid

9:55 STEM Strategic Outlook

• Updated STEM Strategy

• 2018 Performance Review

• 2020 #NASASTEM Priorities

• Feedback Requested

Kris Brown

10:10 Program Update

• Space Grant on the Hill

• Mission Directorate Matching

Elaine Ho

10:25 Break All

10:35 State of Minority University Research Education Project: Historically Black 

Colleges and Universities, Tribal Colleges and other Minority Programs

Torry Johnson

11:05 Performance and Evaluation

• Sparking Interest in STEM Priorities/Expert Review Panel

• Comments from Expert Review Panel

 Rick Gilmore

Michael Lach, Darryl Williams

11:30 Science Mission Directorate

Science Activation (SciAct) National Academy Review

Kristen Erickson

12:15 Break All

12:30 Discuss/Finalize Findings and Recommendations Members

2:00 Adjourn Meeting Beverly Girten

 

For audio, please be sure to use the phone number and participant passcode. Use webex to see the slides.

415-527-5035 or toll access number 929-251-9612 and then the access passcode: 906 147 627 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx link is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/onstage/g.php?MTID=e1cc8a1cb79346fe0f7569c7dbd714050

The WebEx meeting number is 906 147 627 and the password is YJb2y5BSm8$ (case sensitive)
# Samrawit Yeshitla, NASA Pathway Scholar and doctoral student in environmental toxicology at Texas Southern University.

Samrawit Yeshitla, NASA Pathway Scholar and doctoral student in environmental toxicology at TSU.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/samrawit-yeshitla-nasa-pathway-scholar-doctoral-student-environmental-toxicology-texas-southern-university/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x1303pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 18, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
** **

**EXHIBIT32.1**

**SPORT-HALEY, INC.CERTIFICATION**

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

*In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sport-Haley, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, do each certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:*

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2006
| /s/ DONALD W. JEWELL                            |     |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Donald W. Jewell                                |     |
| Chief Executive  Officer                        |     |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)*                | * * |
| * *                                        | * * |
| * *                                        | * * |
| /s/ PATRICK W. HURLEY                           |     |
| Patrick W.  Hurley                              |     |
| Chief Financial  Officer                        |     |
| *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* | * * |

 

----
#### Benj. F. Shepherd *v.*Commonwealth.

Evidence — When Objected to.

Where an illegal order suspending a license to sell spirituous liquors is submitted as evidence in the court below objection to its illegality-must be made at the time of its introduction. It cannot be availed of for the first time on. appeal.

APPEAL EROM CENTER CIRCUIT COURT.

February 24, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

Shepherd, being indicted for keeping a tippling-house, appeared, plead not guilty, and on the trial admitted the selling of the spirits as charged, but relied on his license as a tavern-keeper, read to the jury, without1 objections, the County Court order granting him a license, whereupon the attorney for the Commonwealth read as evidence to the jury, without any objection by defendant, the County Court order suspending the license, and this being all the evidence the court gave to the jury a peremptory instruction to find for the Commonwealth to which defendant excepted.

! . After verdict and judgment defendant moved for a new trial *“*because the court erred in excluding the order of the County Court granting a license to defendant to keep a tavern and because the court erred in the instructions given to the jury.” The bill of exceptions shows that said order granting Shepherd a license to keep a tavern was admitted, and nothing in the exception shows it ivas afterward excluded, so that this assigned cause is not sustained as a fact.

The order suspending the license made it illegal for defendant afterward to sell as charged in the indictment and, therefore, the peremptory instruction was right.

It is now insisted that the order suspending the license was a nullity, because it is not shown that Shepherd had been notified as required by section 9, p. 407 (2 Stanton Rev. Stat.), of any motion to suspend his license.

*373This order does not purport to be a full and perfect transcript of the record and had the defendant objected to its introduction this would have been an available error; but having permitted it to go to the jury without objections and not assigning this as a cause for a new trial we cannot, for the first time, have this objection in this court.

It is but reasonable to presume from Shepherd’s conduct, in not objecting to this order'in the court below, that he had been notified and that the use of the order alone was beneficial to him, as the expense of the transcript enters into the cause of this proceeding.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.
#### John P. Patton *v.*Harrison, Taylor et. al.

life Estate — Vendible interest.

The remainder after a life estate is a vendible interest, however remote and contingent.

APPEAL PROM PLEMING- CIRCUIT COURT.

September 19, 1866.

Opinion op ti-ie Court by

Judge Robertson:

John P. Patton’s remainder after the life estate of his mother, however remote and contingent his right of enjoyment, was cer*305tainly a vendible interest, and his ostensible sale and assignment of it in the year 1838, to his brother, the appellant, if actual and *bona*fide, passed all his title to it.

But the facts conduce irresistibly to the conclusion that the assignment was merely colorable and but recently made for the purpose of protecting that interest from the assignor’s creditors, and should, therefore, be treated as void so far as they are concerned.

And, as the Circuit Court so adjudged, this court approves and affirms that judgment.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

*Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sport-Haley, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,do each certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:*

* *

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 14, 2007

 

 
| /s/  DONALD W. JEWELL                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald  W. Jewell                               |
| Chief  Executive Officer                        |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)*                |
|                                            |
|                                            |
| /s/  PATRICK W. HURLEY                          |   |
| Patrick  W. Hurley                              |
| Chief  Financial Officer                        |
| *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |
|                                                 |        |  |

 

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILFREDO MARTINEZ.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE ROBINSON.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 157 *N. J. Super.*118)
#### P. H. Brown et al. *v.*Jno. Wells et al.

Officers — Constable — Return on Execution Conclusive.

Where an officer makes a return on an execution, "that he had collected said debt,” it is conclusive of the fact upon him and his sureties.

APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

June 11, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

This case has been in this court once before, and was reversed in February last, and remanded with directions to award appellants a new trial and for further proceedings, etc. Under that mandate they had a right to file an answer containing facts which constituted a good defense to the action.

Did the answer which appellants offered to file present such a defense ?

• One of the breaches alleged in the petition is that Bodine, the constable, collected the amount of appellee’s execution from the defendants therein, and returned the fact on the execution, and had failed to pay the same over to him or any part thereof, although payment had been demanded, and especially on the 1st of May, 1863.

Appellants in their answer say they have no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief that John M. Bodine collected the debt set out in the petition, etc. But they do not deny that he had returned the execution with the statement thereon that he had collected said debt, which was material fact, for if the constable had made such return on the execution it was conclusive of the fact upon him and his sureties, and the answer without a denial of that allegation was insufficient.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
No. 87-6620.

#### Hernandez-Beltran *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.28

                         FUTURE COM SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

 $150,000.00                                                 Austin, Texas
                                                             September ___, 1999

     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   the  undersigned   ("Maker")  promises  to  pay  to
Communications Concepts. Inc., ("Payee"), the principal sum of One Hundred Fifty
Thousand Dollars  ($150,000.00)  plus interest on the unpaid principal amount at
the rate of eight percent ( 8% ) per annum,  until the entire  principal  amount
shall have been raid in full.  Maker shall make  payments  to Payee  pursuant to
this  Promissory  Note at such  times  that  the  Board  Of  Directors  of Maker
determines in its sole discretion that Maker has sufficient  funds available for
such payments,  provided however,  that ail unpaid amounts owed pursuant to this
Note shall be due and payable upon demand made by Payee on or after  September -
2004.

     Payments  received  from  Maker  first  shall be  applied  against  accrued
interest and then against  Principal.  Principal.  Payments  shall be considered
made when Payee  receives  delivery  at the address set forth of a check for the
amount of the payment,  provided  that such check  subsequently  is honored when
first  presented to Maker's  bank.  This  Promissory  Note may be prepaid at any
time.

     Presentment for payment.  notice of dishonor and protest are hereby- waived
by Maker.  guarantors  and any endorsers  hereof.  No extension of Payment shall
release any Maker. guarantor or endorser if given without his consent.

     THIS  PROMISSORY NOTE AND THE PAYMENTS TO BE MADE BY MAKER PURSUANT TO THIS
PROMISSORY NOTE MAY NOT BE ASSIGNED BY PAYEE.

                                              MAKER:

                                              Future Com South
                                              Florida, Inc.


                                              By: /s/: Warren Blanck, Secretary
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                       Warren Blanck, Secretary


     The undersigned  Payee agrees that this Promissory Note represents  payment
in full of all amounts owed by Maker :o Payee as of the date of this  Promissory
Note.
                                              Communications
                                              Concepts. Inc.



Date:__________________                       By: /s/: William Gale
                                              ----------------------
                                                          Signature

                                                       William Gale, President
                                                       Printed Name and Title

                                       90