alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report 

Updated Date: 

Number of Employees requiring PIV credentials* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* 

Number of Employees with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* 

Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* 

Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials 

Number of Contractors requiring NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check 

Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process 

Number of Contractors with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation) 

Mar/2007 18,750 0 N/A N/A 0 70,996 52,885 N/A N/A 

Jun/2007 18,693 2,808 N/A N/A 17 56,487 35,159 N/A N/A 

Sept/2007 18,787 0 N/A N/A 14 54,005 15,363 N/A N/A 

Dec/2007 17,751 208 2,578 16,051 86 58,909 3,747 30,459 24,753 

Mar/2008 17,414 203 2,221 16,377 1,394 58,422 4,036 29,395 26,391 

Jun/2008 7,286 636 4,136 14,033 11,519 34,710 3,605 25,684 26,099 Sep/2008 1,696 253 3,806 14,376 16,739 24,147 3,094 21,053 36,499 

Dec/2008 480 232 3,749 14,538 17,990 6,947 1,599 18,708 39,969 

Mar/2009 464 187 3,870 14,647 18,240 6,008 860 17,853 41,083 

Key Milestone Dates

[Planned Date of Full Implementation] 

9/30/2011

Complete issuance of PIV credentials to all Employees and Contractors: October Complete adjudication or verification of background investigations for all EmployeeComplete integration of PIV credentials with logical access systems: September 3Complete integration of PIV credentials with physical access systems: December Issuing PIV credentials to all new employees and contractors as part of the boardin
cers-ex101_169.htm



Exhibit 10.1

2019 and 2020 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements

The compensation for the executive officers of Cerus Corporation regarding annual base salaries and target bonus percentages were as follows:

 


					
	
Name
	
2019
Annual Base
Salary as of

March 1
	
2019
Targeted Bonus
(paid in 2020)
	
2020
Annual Base
Salary as of

March 1
	
2020
Targeted Bonus
(to be paid in

2021)

	
William M. Greenman

President and Chief Executive Officer
	
$650,000
	
65%
	
$675,000
	
65%

	
Kevin D. Green

VP, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	
$409,336
	
45%
	
$429,803
	
45%

	
Richard J. Benjamin 

Chief Medical Officer
	
$429,698
	
45%
	
$444,737
	
45%

	
Laurence M. Corash, M.D.

Chief Scientific Officer
	
$441,537
	
45%
	
$445,953
	
45%

	
Vivek Jayaraman

Chief Operating Officer
	
$434,805
	
50%
	
$478,286
	
50%

	
Chrystal N. Menard

Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel
	
$402,436
	
45%
	
$416,522
	
45%

	
Carol Moore

Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality 
	
$367,427
	
45%
	
$380,287
	
45%
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH B. ORR.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# STS-41G Sullivan EVA

41G-13-032 (11 Oct. 1984) --- Astronaut Kathryn D. Sullivan checks the latch of the SIR-B antenna in the space shuttle Challenger's open cargo bay during her historic extravehicular activity (EVA) on Oct. 11, 1984. Earlier, America's first woman to perform an EVA and astronaut David C. Leestma, participated in an in-space simulation of refueling a spacecraft in orbit. The Orbital Refueling System (ORS) is just beyond the astronaut mission specialist's helmet. To the left is the Large Format Camera (LFC). The LFC and ORS are stationed on a device called the Mission Peculiar Support Structure (MPESS). Crew members consisted of astronauts Robert L. Crippen, commander; Jon A. McBride, pilot; along with Kathryn D. Sullivan, Sally K. Ride, and David D. Leestma, all mission specialists; and Canadian astronaut Marc Garneau and Paul D. Scully-Power, both payload specialist.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/41g-13-032/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize4021x2620pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 01, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Sandra L. Johnson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000892158
<NAME> LAURAL CAPITAL GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,041
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,313
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     41,458
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,357
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,417
<LOANS>                                        154,031
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,917
<DEPOSITS>                                     177,414
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,797
<LONG-TERM>                                     17,131
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 225,917
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,962
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,273
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   622
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,857
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,064
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,793
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 225
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,508
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,508
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        596
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,852
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       29
<RECOVERIES>                                        30
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,862
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,862
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Reply to Att of:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

December 2, 2019

General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the
Ball Aerospace Celebration of Innovation Reception on December 10, 2019

On December 10, 2019, Ball Aerospace will host an event at the Ronald Reagan Building,
Rotunda in Washington, D.C. from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. The estimated value of the event,
including all food and drink, is approximately $45 per person. The event is to provide a
forum for discussion on innovation and technology. Ball Aerospace is in control of all the
arrangements and invitations for the event.

Approximately 500 people have been invited to attend the event. Attendees will have a
diversity of views or interests and will include members from the legislative branch,
personnel from federal agencies, industry, academia, and members of the public.
Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding
various NASA programs. There is also an Agency interest in having NASA personnel
attend this event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange
ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. I find that this
event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. §
2635.204(g).

Accordingly, NASA employees, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the
interests of Ball Aerospace, may accept an invitation for free attendance to this event. In
those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern
that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance
of their duties.

However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13770, may only attend if they reimburse the hosts the value
of the event. Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending
matter affecting the interests of Ball Aerospace, such as procurement duties, program
management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a
separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the
invitation under the widely attended gathering exception.

Eile

Adam F, Greensténe
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1549
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard W. Robin, Chief Executive Officer of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), and I, Patti Ketchner,
Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge, as follows:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 16thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Howard W. RobinHoward W. RobinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Patti KetchnerPatti KetchnerVice President, Finance and Corporate Controller(Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




This certification is furnished
and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section, nor shall such certification be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any
registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
DUANE EDGAR GRAVELINE (M.D.)

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

PERSONAL DATA: Born March 2,1931 in Newport, Vermont. Single. Four 

grown children. Retired from family practice after twenty-five years. Now a writer 

of medical and science fiction. Other hobbies include medical counseling, reading, 

painting and personal health maintenance.

EDUCATION: Graduated from Newport High School in 1948. Received his 

Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Vermont in June 1951 and his 

Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of Vermont College of Medicine in 

June 1955.

EXPERIENCE: Dr. Graveline entered the United Stated Air Force Medical Service 

after graduation from medical college and interned at Walter Reed Army Hospital 

from July 1955 through June 1956. Following internship he attended the primary 

course in Aviation Medicine, Class 566, at Randolph Air Force Base and was assigned to Kelly Air Force Base as Chief of 

the Aviation Medicine Service.

Dr. Graveline was granted the aeronautical rating of flight surgeon in February 1957. From September 1957 to June 1958 he 

attended Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health where he received his Master’s degree in Public Health. 

He then attended the Aerospace Medical residency at the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, completing his residency 

training in July 1960 at Brooks Air Force Base and receiving his speciality certification by the American Board in 

Preventative Medicine. At this time he was assigned to the Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory as research scientist with 

special interest in prolonged weightlessness deconditioning and countermeasures. In July 1962 he returned to Brooks Air 

Force Base where he continued his research, directed an analysis team on Soviet bioastronautics and was active as a NASA 

flight controller for the Mercury and Gemini missions.

Dr. Graveline is the author of fifteen professional publications and reports on biological deconditioning and weightlessness 

countermeasures. His research has involved bed rest and water immersion to study deconditioning. He did the original 

research on both the extremity tourniquet and lower body negative pressure techniques for use in prolonged zero gravity 

missions.

In June 1965, Dr. Graveline was selected with NASA’s fourth group of scientist astronauts and assigned to Williams Air 

Force Base for jet pilot training. He resigned due to personal reasons and returned to civilian life. Dr. Graveline practiced 

medicine as a family doctor in Burlington, Vermont during which time he also served as a flight surgeon for the Vermont 

Army National Guard. Since his retirement at age sixty Dr. Graveline has become a writer of medical and science fiction 

thrillers with five novels to his credit and a sixth in the works. 

SEPTEMBER 1999

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual. 

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

UCLOUDLINK GROUP INC. 

优克联集团 
  

			
	Number	  	Ordinary Shares

 Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is US$100,000 divided into 

2,000,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.00005 each, comprising of 

(i) 1,700,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.00005 each, 

(ii) 200,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.00005 each, and 

(iii) 100,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.00005 each of such class or classes (however designated) 

 

			
	THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT	  	is the registered holder of

 Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum 

and Articles of Association thereof. 
 EXECUTED on behalf of the
said Company on the     day of                      2019 by: 

DIRECTOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000892381
<NAME>                         F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series IX
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   2,250,181
<SECURITIES>                                             5,866,777
<RECEIVABLES>                                              222,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         8,339,010
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           8,339,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      410,985
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               7,928,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             8,339,010
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           552,649
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            78,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            473,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               473,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                71.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell FLORENCE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-20073.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 3, 2003.

*405James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, Jeffery Alan Babcock, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roland E Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, H Michael Sokolow, Brent Evan Newton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Darrell Florence (“Florence”) appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Relying on our decision in *United States v. Emerson,*270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), *cert. denied,*536 U.S. 907, 122 S.Ct. 2362, 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002), that the Second Amendment affords individuals a protected right to bear arms, Florence argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is not narrowly tailored in light of the interplay of the Second Amendment and the regulation of interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause, is overly broad in its reach given the legislative history of its intent, and unevenly burdens a fundamental right in violation of equal protection by relying on inconsistent state law definitions.

Because Florence did not make the above arguments in the district court either at rearraignment or at sentencing, our review is for plain error. *See United States v. Munoz,*150 F.3d 401, 419 (5th Cir.1998); *United States v. Krout,*66 F.3d 1420, 1434 (5th Cir.1995). We specifically recognized in *Emerson*that “it is clear that *felons,*infants, and those of unsound mind may be prohibited from possessing firearms.” *Emerson,*270 F.3d at 261 (emphasis added). In light of this recognition, we conclude that Florence has failed to demonstrate plain error. *See United States v. Calverley, 37*F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc).

Relying on the Supreme Court’s decisions in *Jones v. United States,*529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000), *United States v. Morrison,*529 U.S. 598, 120 S.Ct. 1740, 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000), and *United States v. Lopez,*514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), Florence also argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause power because the regulated activity does not substantially affect interstate commerce. Alternatively, he argues that the factual basis for his plea was insufficient because the evidence established only that the firearm had traveled across state lines at some unspecified point in the past.

Florence raises his arguments solely to preserve them for possible Supreme Court review. As he acknowledges, his arguments are foreclosed by existing Fifth Circuit precedent. *See United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), ce*rt. denied,*534 U.S. 1150, 122 S.Ct. 1113, 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1028

___________ Tamara Stone Enderud, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the George Jackson Mental Health Center, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Arkansas Department of Human * Services, (Originally sued as George * Jackson Mental Health Center) also * known as George Jackson Mental * Healthcare, * * Appellee.

___________ Submitted: February 21, 2001 Filed: February 26, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 TheHONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Tamara Stone-Enderud appeals the district court’s 1 judgment in favor of defendant following a bench trial in her employment discrimination action. After careful consideration of the arguments in Stone-Enderud’s brief, we conclude that the district court’s judgment should be affirmed. Stone-Enderud fails to direct us to anything in the record which would show that the district court erred in entering judgment against her after finding that her former employer did not engage in intentional discrimination against her based on her religion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Sitemap

## August 15, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 08
- August 15, 2014

            - NASA Opens Media Accreditation for Next SpaceX Station Resupply Mission
            - Looking Up the Ramp Holding ‘Bonanza King’ on Mars
            - Down Northeastern Ramp into ‘Hidden Valley’ on Mars
            - Drilling Candidate Site ‘Bonanza King’ on Mars
            - Comet Surface Variations
            - NASA Opens Media Accreditation for Next SpaceX Station Resupply Mission
            - The Future of CubeSats
            - NASA Opens Media Accreditation for Next SpaceX Station Resupply Mission
            - STS-118 Shuttle Mission
            - Gulfstream II