alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.0

        CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT, CEO (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) AND
        PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sandston Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel J. Dorman, as
President, CEO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Daniel J. Dorman
--------------------

Name:  Daniel J. Dorman
Title: President, CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial
       Officer
Date:  August 12, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                    Page 12
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY930000-L51100000-GN0000-LVEMK10CW370; WYW140590]


Notice of Correction to Notice of Intent To Prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Gas Hills Uranium Project, 
Fremont and Natrona Counties, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 7, 2010, the Bureau of Land Management published 
a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the 
Gas Hills Uranium Project, Fremont and Natrona Counties, Wyoming (75 FR 
54384). The notice inadvertently contained an incorrect legal land 
description. The correct legal land description for the Gas Hills 
Uranium Project location is as follows:

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

    T. 32 N., R. 89 and 90 W.
    T. 33 N., R. 89 and 90 W.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Yannone, Project Leader, at 
307-332-8448.

Donald A. Simpson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-27801 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID TAYLOR.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
# TV transmission views (poor quality)

S72-35900 (25 April 1972) --- Astronaut Thomas K. (Ken) Mattingly II, command module pilot of the Apollo 16 lunar landing mission, floats in space outside the spacecraft during his trans-Earth extravehicular activity (EVA), as seen in this reproduction taken from a color television transmission made by a color TV camera mounted on the Command Module (CM) hatch. Mattingly used hand-holds and a foot restraint to hold himself in position, and he was secured to the spacecraft by an umbilical tether line. During his EVA, Mattingly made an inspection of the Service Module's (SM) Scientific Instrument Module (SIM) bay, and retrieved film cassettes from the Panoramic Camera and the Mapping Camera. The trans-Earth EVA occurred at ground elapsed time of 242:55, and 2:49 p.m. (CST), Tuesday, April 25, 1972.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s72-35900/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 1, 1972ProducerJSCSize1920x1474pxPIA NumberS72-35900The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								May 01, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2008



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Enterprise Life
for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Carol A. Holton, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     /s/ Carol A. Holton
     --------------------
Name:    Carol A. Holton
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    March 27, 2003
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_______________________________

JONATHAN LEE RICHES, a/k/a 

Jonathathan Lee Riches, d/b/a Bernard 

Madoff, Investment Securites, LLC, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

THE GHOSTBUSTERS; DAN 

AYKROYD; BILL MURRAY; HAROLD 

RAMIS; ERNIE HUDSON, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 10-1278

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01606-ZLW)

(D. Colo.)

_______________________________

ORDER

_______________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 10-1278 Document: 01018461507 Date Filed: 07/21/2010 Page: 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CLEARFIELD CITY, a Utah municipal

corporation, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

LYNN A. JENKINS, an individual, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-4046

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-00184-TS)

(D. of Utah)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4046 Document: 01018384885 Date Filed: 03/16/2010 Page: 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CAROL NOLL.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### F. G. Murphy, Etc. *v.*Turner Nelson, Administrator, Etc.

Usury — Pleading — Void Contract.

It is not necessary to plead usury where the statute declares all contracts for more than legal interest void to the extent of the usury, and a court of equity will not enforce a void contract.

Evidence — Pleading.

It is error for the court to decree a sale of property covered by an alleged lien, where such lien is denied and not sufficiently proved.

Lien — Consideration.

The failure to state on the face of a note a consideration importing a lien implies either that there was no such consideration or that, if a lien existed, it was thereby waived.

APPEAL EROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 25, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Robertson:

Xu rendering judgment on the note for $360 the Circuit Court erred in not giving credit for the usury charged and proved. To *78avail himself of the usury it was not necessary for Murphy to plead it, because the statute (second volume, Stanton’s Revision, p. 63), declares all contracts for more than legal interest void to tbe extent of the usury, and court of equity should not enforce a. void contract.

It seems to us also that the Circuit Court erred in decreeing a sale of the house and lot for enforcing an alleged lien, denied and not sufficiently proved. Rupell having paid the full consideration to- Wilson thereby discharged the lien as against himself and even if Wilson accepted, as part payment, notes held by Rupell on Murphy *&*Ohanb given for the house and lot and thereby held Rupell’s lien, there is no sufficient proof that the note afterward given to Wilson for $336 was a substitute for any part of the consideration of the sale by Rupell of the house and lot, or was intended to operate as a lien. Wilson’s allegation on this subject is somewhat discredited by his mistake in charging that the note for $336 was also given for a part of the consideration of the house and lot, and by the fact that the new note for $336 does not state or, in any way, indicate such a consideration, which, had it been so and a lien had been intended, a prudent man expecting to secure it would probably show the lien on the face of the note itself, and his failure to state the consideration importing a lien implies either that there was no such consideration or according to the spirit of the statute expounded in. 18 B. Mon. 652, he waived the lien.

Under these circumstances the vague “ impression ” of Ohanb as to the consideration is not sufficient against Murphy’s denial to ■authorize a court of equity to enforce the alleged lien to the prejudice'of the other creditors of Murphy whom he attempted to secure by a general assignment.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a dismissal of the petition for sale of the house and lot, and for a credit for the usury. ,.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000769 24-SEP-2013 08:34 AM
#### IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST C. SCHMIDT & SONS, INC. OF N. J.

June 27, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 158 *N. J. Super.*595)
# Sitemap

## September 19, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 09
- September 19, 2019

            - NASA Finishes Assembly of Core Stage Structure
            - NASA Completes Liquid Hydrogen Tank Structural Tests for Artemis I
            - NASA Joins Last of Five Sections for Space Launch System Rocket Stage
            - Downtown Memphis, Tennessee on the Mississippi River
            - The Texas cities of Galveston and Bolivar Peninsula
            - The northeastern Chinese port city of Tianjin
            - Melbourne, Australia on Port Philip Bay
            - The north coast of Maui on the Hawaiian island chain
            - Kentucky Companies Give NASA Artemis Missions Boost to the Moon
            - Shannon Hill – Goddard Intern Studying Pulsating Auroras
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.9






                             CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE
                                       OF
                                SHARES DESIGNATED
                                       AS
                  SERIES C CONVERTIBLE participating PREFERRED



         STONEPATH GROUP, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST:         That a Certificate of the Designations, Powers,
                        Preferences and Rights of the Series C Convertible
                        Participating Preferred Stock, was filed in said office
                        of the Secretary of State on March 3, 2000.

         SECOND:        That the Board of Directors of said corporation by the
                        unanimous written consent of its members, filed with the
                        minutes of the Corporation dated March 15, 2002 duly
                        adopted a resolution authorizing and directing an
                        increase in the number of shares designated as Series C
                        Convertible Participating Preferred Stock of the
                        corporation, from 4,750,000 shares to 5,000,000 shares,
                        in accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of The
                        General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


         THIRD:         This Certificate of Increase of Shares shall be
                        effective when filed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Stonepath Group, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by Stephen M. Cohen, its Senior Vice President and
Secretary this 27th day of March, 2002.


                                      STONEPATH GROUP, INC.

                                      By:  /s/ Stephen M. Cohen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen M. Cohen
                                           Senior Vice President & Secretary
#### Bryer and Others *v.*Chase.—In error.

THE assignee of a judgment for a certain sum of money filed a bill in chancery against the infant .heirs of the judgment-debtor. The bill alleged that the judgment-debtor died insolvent, leaving certain land on which the judgment was a lien, and prayed that the land might be sold for payment of the judgment. *Held,*

1. That in such suits, Courts of law and equity have concurrent jurisdiction. *Martin*v. *Densford,*3 Blackf. 295.— *Bryan*v. *Blythe,*4 *id.*249.

2. That the defendants being infants, there could not be a final decree against them without proof.

3. That if there was no administrator of the estate, the bill should have alleged that fact; and if there was an1 administrator, he should have been a party. *Welborn*v. *Jolly,*4 Blackf. 279. — Story’s Eq. Pl. 206.

4. That the assignor of the judgment might have been made a party; but *qucere*whether he was a necessary party. 1 Dan. Ch. Pr. 292. — *Elderkin*v. *Shultz,*2 Blackf. 345.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**  **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**  **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**  **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Atlas Technology Group,
      Inc.
      (the “ Registrant ”)
      for
      the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      I,
      Peter B. Jacobson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.





Date:
      April 14, 2008








By: /s/
      Peter
      B. Jacobson


Peter
      B.
      Jacobson


Chief
      Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      such
      Act, be deemed filed by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange
      Act ”).
      Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
      reference.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,332-01

EX PARTE COLBY ROSS THURMAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 12720 IN THE 118 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HOWARD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied adequate notice that he would

be considered for release on mandatorysupervision bythe Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles under

the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42.18, § 8(c). 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,
2

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was afforded adequate

notice that he would be considered for release on mandatory supervision by the Texas Board of

Pardons and Paroles under the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute. Ex parte Retzlaff, 135

S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). If Applicant was provided with adequate notice, the trial court

shall supplement the habeas record with copies of the notices provided to Applicant. The trial court

shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and

appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 14, 2015

Do not publish
# Gemini I

Occurred 60 years ago

Gemini 1 was an uncrewed orbital test of the Titan 2 launch vehicle, the Gemini spacecraft structural integrity, and the launch vehicle-spacecraft compatibility. The test covered all phases through the orbital insertion phase. Other objectives were to check out launch vehicle-spacecraft launch heating conditions, launch vehicle performance, launch vehicle flight control system switch-over circuits, launch vehicle orbit insertion accuracy, and the malfunction detection system. This was the first production Gemini spacecraft and launch vehicle.

Mission Type

mission duration

Launch

Landing

## Gemini I

The NSSDC provides an in-depth overview of the Gemini I mission objectives, spacecraft, and program.
More About Gemini I

Featured Story

# Project Gemini: Apollo’s Training Ground

On May 5, 1961, Alan Shepard’s Mercury flight was inked in history books. Twenty days later, President John F. Kennedy…
Read the Story

## Project Gemini

41 Images

Go To Gallery

Go To Gallery

## Gemini News

				More NASA History                			

Image Article1 Min Read
Gemini VI Astronauts Thomas P. Stafford and Walter M. Schirra Jr.

Article5 Min Read
Remembering Gene Cernan

Article7 Min Read
Gemini Pioneered the Technology Driving Today’s Exploration
Article11 Min Read
60 Years Ago: NASA Selects A Second Group of Astronauts

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space

Project Gemini

NASA History

### The National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
                  - About NASA's Mission
Join Us

                    - Home
                    - News & Events
                    - Multimedia
                    - NASA+
                    - Missions
                    - Humans in Space
                    - Earth & Climate
                    - The Solar System
                    - The Universe
                    - Science
                    - Aeronautics
                    - Technology
                    - Learning Resources
                    - About NASA
                    - NASA en Español

### Follow NASA

                    -   
                    -   
                    -   
                    -   

                  - 
                  - More NASA Social Accounts
                  - NASA Newsletters

                - Sitemap
                - For Media
                - Privacy Policy
                - FOIA
                - No FEAR Act
                - Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 02, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michele Ostovar								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman