alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SARA CUARESMA,

Appellant,

v.

PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-458

[March 11, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015CA009967.

Melissa C. Mihok of CPLS, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Sean Fahey, Office of General Counsel, The School Board of Palm Beach 

County, Florida, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Barnes, White et al. *v.*John Triplett.

Verdict Against the Evidence — New Trial.

There being no evidence to sustain plaintiff’s right of action a jury should have found for the defendant; therefore, the court should have awarded the appellant a new trial.

APPEAL EROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

October 3, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

There' were but two witnesses sworn in the case, Tesler and Hoffman, and their evidence does not conflict, but is consistent and harmonious. Hoffman corroborates Tesler as far as the latter deposes.

*398If the jury gave credit to Hoffman their verdict should have-been for the defendants; if they did not, then the plaintiff had not sustained his right of action by evidence, and the jury should have found against him.

In any view of this evidence, the jury should have found for appellants, and because they found for appellee the court should have awarded a new trial.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions to award a new trial, .and for further proceedings.
#### Stanley F. Leeds *v.*A. Blackwell.

Purchase of Land — Written Contract — Mistake of Draftsman — Evidence.

Where a draftsman makes a mistake in reducing a contract for the purchase of land to writing, his evidence is competent to establish that fact.

Rent.

Where a purchaser of land enters under the contract and oifers, in good faith, to perform it, he should not be held to pay rent.

APPEAL PROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT.

*Huston,*for Appellant.

*8iuvpson,*for Appellee.

February 2, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams :

Leeds entered upon the land as a purchaser and not as tenant; he avers that he was to pay $5,000 when the deed was made by Blackwell and wife and confirmed by the court, which it was anticipated would be done at the term then in session, but which for some cause was not done, that the draftsman being in a hurry made a mistake in reducing the contract to writing, and when he objected the draftsman assured him it made no difference, and these facts were substantiated by the evidence of the draftsman, who was a practicing lawyer and Blackwell’s attorney, thus proving a double mistake first in reducing the contract to writing and then getting appellant to sign it under a mistaken understanding of its effect; in this view the evidence of the attorney was not only competent but highly proper and the court erred in excluding it from the jury; it was certainly competent to establish the issue made by appellant in his answer. If he entered as a purchaser and complied with his contract and offered to perform in good faith he should not be held to pay rent.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial in accordance herewith.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41070

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DEAN COOKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-15-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Dean Cooks appeals his conviction and sentence for

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the district court erred in

holding him accountable, for purposes of sentencing, for the

entire amount of cocaine base found in the vehicle in which he

was traveling. The district court did not clearly err in finding

that Cooks was part of a jointly undertaken criminal activity and

that the entire amount of cocaine base was foreseeable to him,

thus making him accountable for the entire amount. See United 
No. 97-41070

-2-

States v. Garcia, 86 F.3d 394, 400 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied,

117 S. Ct. 752 (1997); United States v. Hernandez-Coronado, 39

F.3d 573, 574 (5th Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order Lansing, Michigan
December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132275 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver MELVINA SEYFRIED, Plaintiff-Appellee, Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 132275 Justices COA: 270171 Clinton CC: 05-009930-CK BRUCE SEYFRIED, Defendant-Appellant,

and

DONALD SEYFRIED and LISA SEYFRIED, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/
On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 15, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
December 28, 2006 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1873 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1873

 To require employees at a call center who either initiate or receive 
 telephone calls to disclose the physical location of such employees, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2003

 Mr. Daschle (for Mr. Kerry) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require employees at a call center who either initiate or receive 
 telephone calls to disclose the physical location of such employees, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Call Center Consumer's Right to Know 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CALL CENTER REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--A United States corporation or its subsidiaries 
that utilizes a call center to initiate telephone calls to, or receive 
telephone calls from, individuals located in the United States, shall 
require each employee in the call center to disclose the physical 
location of such employee at the beginning of each telephone call so 
initiated or received.
    (b) Certification Requirement.--A corporation or subsidiary 
described in subsection (a) shall annually certify to the Federal Trade 
Commission whether or not the corporation or subsidiary, and the 
employees of the corporation or subsidiary at its call centers, have 
complied with that subsection.
    (c) Noncompliance.--A corporation or subsidiary that violates 
subsection (a) shall be subject to such civil penalties as the Federal 
Trade Commission prescribes under section 3.
    (d) Call Center Defined.--In this section, the term ``call center'' 
means a location that provides customer-based service and sales 
assistance or technical assistance and expertise to individuals located 
in the United States via telephone, the Internet, or other 
telecommunications and information technology.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES.

    Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Federal Trade Commission shall prescribe rules to provide for 
effective monitoring and compliance with this Act. The Federal Trade 
Commission's rulemaking shall include appropriate civil penalties for 
noncompliance with this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kankakee Bancorp, Inc (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, Carol S. Hoekstra,
Executive Vice President, Interim COO and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



  /s/ Carol S. Hoekstra
------------------------------------

Carol S. Hoekstra,
Executive Vice President, Interim COO and
Principal Executive Officer

May 13, 2003
# Oceanography – NASA

Official National Aeronautics and Space Administration Website

- ‘Vast and Rich:’ Studying the Ocean With NASA Computer Simulations “Every time I help with visualizing [ocean] simulation data, I learn about an entirely new area of ocean or climate research, and I’m reminded of how vast and rich this area of research is. And...the real magic happens at the intersection and interaction of simulated and observed data. It is a great honor – and [&#8230;]
- NASA’s PACE Data on Ocean, Atmosphere, Climate Now Available NASA is now publicly distributing science-quality data from its newest Earth-observing satellite, providing first-of-their-kind measurements of&#160;ocean health, air quality,&#160;and the effects of a changing climate. The Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) satellite was launched on Feb. 8, and has been put through several weeks of in-orbit testing of the spacecraft and instruments to ensure [&#8230;]
- Simulating Early Ocean Vents Shows Life’s Building Blocks Form Under Pressure Where did life first form on Earth? Some scientists think it could have been around hydrothermal vents that may have existed at the bottom of the ocean 4.5 billion years ago. In a new paper in the journal Astrobiology, scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory describe how they mimicked possible ancient undersea environments with a [&#8230;]
#### Harrison Crouch et al. *v.*James Huffstutter et al.

Wills — 'Devise of Land — Postponement of Partition — Joint Tenancy.

Where a will postpones a partition of land devised until the death of one of the devisees, the others are not entitled to have a division until that event happens, hut are entitled to enjoy the estate as joint tenants.

APPEAL PROM NICHOLAS CIRCUIT COURT.

June 29, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Robertson:

As the will postpones a partition until after the death of the idiot, John, as well as of his mother, and John still survives, the appellants are not now entitled to partition. But the heirs of David Huff stutter are entitled to all his rights as joint devisees with the appellee James Huffstutter, and consequently they have a right to enjoy their share, as he might do if still alive, by joint occupancy or otherwise. At the idiot’s death, therefore, the appellants or their heirs will be entitled to an allotment of their proper shares of the joint property devised to David and James, *454and, in the meantime, they are entitled to their proportionate share of occupancy or profits, after deducting the maintenance charged on the land. The petition alleges that there will be profits or rents after making that deduction. The allegations of the petition make, therefore, a *prima facie*case of title to some relief, and consequently the demurrer ought to have been overruled. It would be prudent, however, to make all David’s heirs parties.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for answer and further proceedings for ascertaining the extent of profits or whether any since David Huffstutter’s death, and for general relief as far as appellants may show themselves entitled to it.
EXHIBIT
32.1














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO





18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005








I, Alexey
A. Kim, Chief Executive Officer of Promotora Valle Hermoso, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amended Annual Report of
the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.






/s/ Alexey A.
      KimAlexey
      A. KimChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2009
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

maria caballero

consulting engineer

main idea:

SUPPORTING DETAIL 1: 

SUPPORTING DETAIL 2: 

SUPPORTING DETAIL 3: 

interesting fact 1 interesting fact 2

interesting fact 3
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

maria caballero

CONSULTING ENGINEER

my opinion on this story questions i have summary
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31014 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MITCHELL MINOR, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CR-6-ALL)

- - - - - - - - - - November 25, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Mitchell Minor, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Minor has not, however, established that the district court clearly erred in finding that police officers saw him carrying a cloth bag out of which protruded the butt of a revolver and that he abandoned the bag containing the revolver while being pursuedby the police; thus, the district court did not err in denying

Minor’s motion to suppress. See California v. Hodari D. , 499 U.S. 621, 625-26 (1991). Minor next argues that counsel was ineffective in agreeing with the government to stipulate to the fact that Minor had a prior felony conviction. Although such claims are not ordinarily reviewed on direct appeal, the district court record in the instant case is sufficient to dispose of this claim. See United States v. Gibson , 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). Minor has failed to demonstrate that counsel performed deficiently or prejudicially in agreeing to the stipulation, so his ineffectiveness claim is without merit. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 697 (1984)

. Minor additionally challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, given the fact that the revolver was not found on his person at the time of his arrest. His claim is without merit because any reasonable jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that he possessed, then abandoned, the revolver. See United States v. Gresham , 118 F.3d 258, 265 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 702 (1998);

see also Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 318-19 (1979). Finally, Minor contends that the district court erred in refusing to award him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Minor did not plead guilty but put the government to its burden of proof at trial and has done nothing since his conviction to demonstrate that he has accepted responsibility for his crime. Consequently, the district courtcommitted no error in concluding that Minor did not merit a

downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and thus declining to award one. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (nn.1 & 2).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1674 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1674

                     For the relief of Adam Paluch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2003

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Adam Paluch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ADAM PALUCH.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Adam Paluch shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Adam Paluch enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Adam Paluch 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Adam Paluch, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
|X-1 HomeBibliographyHuman ElementPhoto GalleryReportsThe X Programs |  | X-1:Fiftieth Anniversary















Commemorative StampDryden Gallery Of PhotosChuck YeagerSlick GoodlinUpdated September 18, 1997For further information contacthistinfo@hq.nasa.gov or Steve Garber, NASA History Office,steve.garber@hq.nasa.gov
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# STS-111 Food Testing

JSC2001-E-25713 (27 August 2001) --- Astronaut Franklin R. Chang-Diaz, STS-111 mission specialist, is photographed during food testing in the Flight Projects Division Laboratory at the Johnson Space Center (JSC).

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-jsc2001e25713/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 27, 2001ProducerJSCImage CreditJames BlairSize1152x1728pxPIA NumberJSC2001E25713The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								May 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.02
 
  a)
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31,
2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By
    
    /s/ Peter L. BuzyPeter L. BuzyChief Financial Officer
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

S. MOLI NGATUVAI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 10-4037

v. (Case No. 2:09-CV-01016-TS)

UTAH COMMUNITY CREDIT

UNION; BRANDON PEARSON,

Branch Manager; SHAWN (LNU),

Secretary to CEO; LISA (LNU), Asset

Manager,

(D. Utah)

Defendants-Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff filed a pro se § 1983 action against a credit union and certain of its

employees based on their denial of his request for a $100 overdraft as well as the

Appellate Case: 10-4037 Document: 01018428518 Date Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

credit union’s alleged failure to have minorities employed in its offices in the city

where Plaintiff resides. Plaintiff did not allege he ever sought employment at the

credit union. The district court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state

a claim on which relief could be granted. Specifically, the court concluded the

facts alleged by Plaintiff did not show either the deprivation of a federally

protected right or that Defendants acted under color of state law. 

After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we agree with

the district court that Plaintiff has not set forth a claim on which relief may be

granted. We therefore AFFIRM the dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint for

substantially the reasons given by the district court.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 10-4037 Document: 01018428518 Date Filed: 05/25/2010 Page: 2