alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1803 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1803

          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2003

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halloween Safety Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME EXTENDED TO FIRST WEEK IN NOVEMBER.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 
U.S.C. 260a(a)) is amended by striking ``last Sunday of October'' and 
inserting ``first Sunday of November''.
    (b) Effect on Existing State Elections.--Any law in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act which is--
            (1) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(2) of the Uniform Time 
        Act of 1966 by a State with parts thereof in more than one time 
        zone; or
            (2) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of such Act by a 
        State that lies entirely within one time zone,
shall be held and considered to remain in effect as the exercise by 
that State of the exemption permitted by such Act unless that State, by 
law, provides that such exemption shall not apply.
    (c) Adjustment of Operating Hours of Daytime Broadcasters.--(1) 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any regulation issued 
under law, the Federal Communications Commission shall, consistent with 
any existing treaty or other agreement, make such adjustment by general 
rules, or by interim action pending such general rules, with respect to 
hours of operation of daytime standard amplitude modulation broadcast 
stations as may be consistent with the public interest in receiving 
interference-free service.
    (2) The general rules, or interim action, undertaken under 
paragraph (1) may include variances with respect to operating power and 
other technical operating characteristics.
    (3) At any time after the adoption of general rules under paragraph 
(1), the general rules may be varied with respect to particular 
stations and areas because of the exigencies in each case.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ! Appellee,

v.

FABIAN MARTINEZ!MONTES,

Defendant ! Appellant.

No. 09-4177

(D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00576-TS-1)

ORDER

The stipulation filed by the parties to dismiss the captioned appeal is granted.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-4177 Document: 01018458680 Date Filed: 07/16/2010 Page: 1
#### Brown *v.*The State.—In error.

INDICTMENT for larceny. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the state. It appeared by the transcript that the cause had been tried by only eleven jurors. The Court held the trial to be a nullity, set aside the judgment and verdict, and remanded the cause for another trial (1).

1

*(1)*When the judgment, by virtue of which the defendant is in the state prison, is reversed, the Supreme Court must immediately cause the Governor to be informed of the reversal, &c. For the duties of the Supreme Court and of the Governor in such cases, see R. S. 1843, pp. 639, 640.
NAC 2010-02-18 (TIC-OS) 


Encouraging Diversity of Thought 


Recommendation: 

The Council encourages NASA to engage in cross-fertilization of personnel between NASA 

Centers and between NASA and outside organizations through Intergovernmental Personnel Act 

(IP A) Agreements and rotational assignments as a way of encouraging innovation as the Agency 

Plans and implements its new technology programs and in general. Innovation results from 

exposure to new ideas, new people, new workplaces. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with both the Council's contention that innovation results from exposure to new 

ideas, new people, and new workplaces and the Council's recognition that IP A and rotational 

assignments support such innovation. NASA will continue to encourage both mechanisms for 

cross-fertilization ofpersonnel and ideas. Rotational assignments of varying lengths are key 

components ofseveral ofthe Agency's formal development programs, including the new MidLevel Leadership Program and the SES Candidate Development Program. In addition, Centerto-Center detail assignments are highly encouraged and frequently utilized by a large number of 

organizations. In some cases (including, but not limited to, the NASA Engineering and Safety 

Center and, currently, the Office ofthe ChiefTechnologist) detailees comprise significant 

percentages of the total organizational complement. Also, significant numbers ofIP A scientists 

and other personnel travel between NASA and academia on a regular basis. Such employees fill 

key positions in the NASA hierarchy during their tenure with the Agency. 

Enclosure 5
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-3630

_____________________________

LARRY DIAMOND EARL ASHLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

September 6, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of UNR Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Iuriy Vladimirivich Shevchenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Iuriy Vladimirovich ShevchenkoIuriy Vladimirivich Shevchenko

Chief Financial Officer

May 24 , 2010






[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UNR Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by UNR Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
No. 14,247.

#### Bain et al. *v.*Goss.

Filed May 3, 1890.

*Practice.*— Imperfect *Record.*— Failure *to Incorporate Evidence.*— Where the evidence is not in the record, and the record is not made up under the provisions of the statute, or the rules of the Supreme Court, in such a mode as to present the questions arising on the admission of evidence, or the rulings upon instructions, without the entire evidence, an appeal will not he sustained.

From the Owen Circuit Court.

*J. H. Jordan, E. C. Steele, L. U. Downey*and *O. Matthews,*for appellants.

*D. E. Beem*and *W. Hickam,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The evidence is not in record, nor is the record made up under the provisions of the statute or the rules of the court in such a mode as to present the questions arising on the admission of evidence or the rulings upon instructions without the entire evidence, and the appeal can not be sustained. We have repeatedly indicated that we should be glad to have the record so made up as to present questions without incorporating the evidence, and we repeat that we should be glad to encourage such a practice. *Jones*v. *Foley,*121 Ind. 180; *Mercer*v. *Corbin,*117 Ind. 450.

It is, however, only where the record is properly made up under the statute or the rules of the court, that we can consider questions whiqji can not be fully undersood and decided without the evidence, in cases where the evidence is not in the record by a bill of exceptions. *McCoy*v. *State, ex rel.,*121 Ind. 160. This case belongs to that class.

Judgment affirmed.
#### McElroy & Carter v. Israel Winfrey.

Demurrer.

A demurrer that brings to light imperfect pleadings will be sustained, the rule being that he who commits the first error must be the first to correct same.

APPEAL PROM RUSSELL CIRCUIT COURT.

June 15, 1866.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

The demurrer to the answer brings up for judicial examination also the pleadings of the plaintiff, and if they are found wanting, the correction must be first made by him, who has committed the first error, for until all is right with him, his complaint of the errors of his adversaries shall not be heard.

Is the plaintiff’s statement of his own case sufficient to entitle him to the judgment he seeks ? We think not.

The note, or writing, which is the foundation of his action, is filed as a part of his petition, and by it, the appellants undertake *177to pay him the sum therein named “ as soon as drawn from the United States by said McElroy, at the rate of $45 per three months.” And in order to enable appellee to recover he must allege that the sums sufficient to satisfy his debt have been drawn by said McElroy from the United States, or that by the negligence, default, or misdoings of appellants, or one of them, they have not been drawn, and as the petition contains no such allegations it fails to state facts sufficient to authorize a recovery. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

J. F. CATTELL ASSOCIATES, INC. 

AND 

PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL 

 CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

v. Record No. 1667-95-1 DECEMBER 29, 1995 

 

LOIS A. POWELL 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (William C. Walker; Donna White Kearney; Bradford C. 

Jacob; Taylor & Walker, on brief), for appellants. 

 (Lawrence J. Pascal; Ashcraft & Gerel, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 J. F. Cattell Associates, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in finding that Lois A. Powell's 

bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a "disease" under 

the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). Upon reviewing the 

record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the 

commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 The facts are not in dispute. Powell began working for 

employer in 1985 as a production typist. She spent ninety 

percent of her seven and one-half hour workday typing. Powell 

types 103 to 106 words per minute. During the last three to five 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

years of her employment, she experienced stabbing or shooting 

pains and periodic numbness in her hands. Because her symptoms 

became worse during the last year of her employment, Powell 

sought medical treatment from Dr. Dennis Faludi, an orthopedic 

surgeon, on July 14, 1994. 

 Based upon his examination of Powell and electrodiagnostic 

studies, Dr. Faludi diagnosed Powell as suffering from bilateral 

carpal tunnel syndrome. Because conservative treatment proved 

unsuccessful, Powell eventually underwent carpal tunnel release 

surgery. 

 We recently held in Perdue Farms, Inc. v. McCutchan, 21 Va. 

App. 65, 68, 461 S.E.2d 431, 435 (1995), that the general medical 

definition of carpal tunnel syndrome places it within the 

definition of disease set forth in Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 17 

Va. App. 499, 503, 438 S.E.2d 769, 772 (1993). As in Perdue, 

Powell's condition did not present as an obvious, sudden, 

mechanical or structural change in her body. Based upon our 

holding in Perdue and upon Dr. Faludi's diagnosis, we conclude 

that credible evidence supports the commission's finding that 

Powell's carpal tunnel syndrome is a condition characterized as a 

"disease" within the meaning of the Act. 

 The commission also ruled that Powell proved that her carpal 

tunnel syndrome was caused by the repetitive trauma of her 

production typing duties. Employer did not appeal this finding. 

 Therefore, it is binding and conclusive upon us. 
 3 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

RUBEN RAY CONTRERAS

,
Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 116

- CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 8 0D0 0522 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ruben Contreras appeals from a conviction for theft which was enhanced by two prior theft

convictions. A jury found Contreras guilty and assessed his punishment at confinement in the state

jail for tw o years. We affirm.

F RIVOLOUS A PPEAL

Appellant's court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in support

of the motion in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect,

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 n.92

(Tex.Crim.App. 2008)("In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance 'arguable' points

of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural

history and set out pertinent legal authorities."); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.

1978). Counsel has notified the Court in writing that he has delivered a copy of counsel's brief,

the motion to withdraw, and a copy of the clerk's and reporter's records to Appellant, and he has

advised Appellant of his right to review the record, file a pro s e brief, and of his right to seek

discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318

- 20

(Tex.Crim.App. 2014)(setting forth duties of counsel). In addition, Counsel also stated that he

provided Appellant with a mo tion requesting access to the appellate record in compliance with

Kelly , however, as noted above Appellant was provided a copy of the appellate record by his

attorney. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief.

After carefully reviewing the record and counse l's brief, we find nothing that might

arguably support the appeal , and accordingly, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous and

without merit. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005) . The

judgment of the trial court is a ffirmed.

October 25, 2019 TOM GRAY

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Gray, C.J. Gray, C.J. (Sitting by Assignment)

(Do Not Publish)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                    The                     **Federal Register**                     Notice for the AP1000 Subcommittee Meeting is being revised to notify the following:                

This meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, Thursday, November 18, 2010, and Friday, November 19, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.

                    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Thursday, October 21, 2010, [75 FR 65036-65037]. All other items remain the same as previously published.                

                    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting Weidong Wang, Designated Federal Office (Telephone 301-415-6279,                     *E-mail: Weidong.Wang@nrc.gov*                     between 7:30 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. (ET)).                

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Antonio F. Dias,

Chief,  Reactor Safety Branch B,  Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 2010-27273 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# MS Tanner and MS Noriega pose in LCVGs prior to the third EVA of STS-97

STS097-327-033 (30 Nov.-11 Dec. 2000) --- Astronauts Joseph R. Tanner (left) and Carlos I. Noriega, both mission specialists, who participated in three STS-97 space walks, don their extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) space suits for one of the walks. Tanner and Noriega are wearing the liquid cooling and ventilation garment that complements the EMU.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts097-327-033/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenDecember 7, 2000ProducerJSCSize1920x1270pxPIA Numbersts097-327-033The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 2

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2017.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Paul D. Ryan, a Representative from the 
State of Wisconsin, has been elected Speaker; and that Karen L. Haas, a citizen 
of the State of Maryland, has been elected Clerk of the House of Representatives 
of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# SpaceX Crew-3 Liftoff

The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with the Crew Dragon lifts off from Launch Pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Nov. 10, 2021. Aboard the Crew Dragon are the SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts Raja Chari, Tom Marshburn, Kayla Barron, and ESA (European Space Agency) astronaut Matthias Maurer.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/spacex-crew-3-liftoff-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASA/Kim ShiflettSize1041x1562pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Stonepath Group, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form S-3 (Nos.  333-64452,  333-91240,  333-104228,  333-108605,  333-110231 and
333-112609)  and the  registration  statements  on  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-74918,
333-103439,  333-109249 and 333-113052) of Stonepath  Group,  Inc. of our report
dated  February 24,  2004,  with respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of
Stonepath Group,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity and comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year  period ended
December  31, 2003,  and our report  dated  January 31, 2005 with respect to the
related financial statement  schedule,  which reports appear in the December 31,
2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Stonepath Group, Inc.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2005


                                      101