alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
(23)





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have
issued our report, dated March 6, 2009, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of
North Carolina, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form S-3
(File No. 333-43426, effective August 10, 2000), and on Form S-8 (File No.
333-46860, effective September 28, 2000).











/s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE,
LLP











Atlanta,
Georgia


March 20,
2009
- Johnson Space Center
- Front Door
- Capabilities & Services   - Mission Planning & Execution
  - Human Subsystems
  - Spacecraft Subsystems
  - Exploration Science
  - Spaceflight Environments & Testing
  - Space Systems
- Opportunities   - Competitive Opportunities
  - Partnerships
  - University Collaboration
  - Technology and Data
  - STEM Resources
  - Prizes and Challenges
  - Economic Impact

# 							A Universe of Limitless  Opportunity						

## Johnson Space Center

# Opportunities

NASA offers a variety of competitive programs and initiatives to stimulate research, foster the innovation economy, and incorporate the latest technological advancements to support our mission. Explore the links below to find ways that you can help accelerate NASA’s missions! 

General 

Small Businesses

Academia

## 				General Opportunities  			

## Government Contracts 

The System for Award Management (SAM.gov) is the official business website of the U.S. Government. NASA contract opportunities will be posted on this site.

## R&D Solicitations 

NASA Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review and Evaluation System  (NSPIRES) a site dedicated to helping the science and technology research community conduct research business with NASA

## Tech Opportunities 

Directory of NASA technology opportunities – filterable by role, funding need, and technology readiness level

## Acquisition Forecast

Consolidated Agency-wide Acquisition Forecast allows users to search NASA Centers for specific types of opportunities to match your interests.

## Game Changing Ideas

The NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Program nurtures visionary ideas that could transform future NASA missions with the creation of breakthroughs

## NASA Careers

USAjobs.gov is the official career website of the U.S. Government. Open NASA job opportunities are posted on USA Jobs. Apply today! 

## 				Small Businesses			

## SBIR & STTR Program 

The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program offers small businesses with 500 or fewer employees a source of seed funding for the development innovations that could potentially support future NASA missions

## Small Business Programs

Directory of Office of Small Business programs and resources 

## 				Universities & Students			

## Federal Grants

Grants.gov is the official grant website of the U.S. Government it provides a directory of federal grants, including NASA opportunities. 

## Space Tech Grants

The Space Technology Research Grants Program accelerates development of low TRL space technologies to support future space science and exploration needs of NASA.

## MSI Opportunities 

The Minority University Research and Education Project provides financial assistance via competitive awards to enhance the research, academic and technology capabilities of Minority Serving Institutions (MSI)

## NASA Internships

Find Your Place in Space by applying for a NASA internship today.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,672,868
<SECURITIES>                                 4,538,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,675,721
<PP&E>                                       8,596,574
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,041,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,876,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,271,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,640
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,299,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,876,543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               600,981
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,982,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,015,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,015,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,015,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7060

JASON A. MORANT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Acting Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-02-748-2) Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 30, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason A. Morant, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jason A. Morant seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            8876
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                      12993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27884
<PP&E>                                            4442
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         14648
<OTHER-SE>                                       14284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31087
<SALES>                                           5208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5208
<CGS>                                             3556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    141
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 89
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        89
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
Ex-99.2 a)

                MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE WITH
                        USAP MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS


March 8, 2000


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAP")
exclusive of standards I.4., III.3., III.4., V.3, and V.4., (collectively the
"Applicable Standards") solely for the purpose of servicing the home equity
loans underlying the Consumer Lending Portfolio.

As these loans are home equity loans rather than first mortgage loans, certain
USAP minimum servicing standards relating to escrows are not applicable.
Specifically, no assertions as to USAP minimum servicing standards I.4., III.3.,
III.4., V.3., and V.4 are being made.

Further, the assertion above relates only to the servicing of loans underlying
the Consumer Lending Portfolio and not to loans in the general first mortgage
servicing population.

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $150,000,000 and $50,000,000,
respectively.




/s/ R. Michael O'Brien
-----------------------------------
R. Michael O'Brien
President & Chief Executive Officer




/s/ David M. Applegate
-----------------------------------
David M. Applegate
Chief Operating Officer




/s/ Edward D. Hughes
-----------------------------------
Edward D. Hughes
Senior Vice President of
Servicing Administration
Mission Control Center

#
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit No. 15


                  INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF
CHROMATICS COLOR SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Chromatics Color Sciences
International, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended, and in our report dated February 15,
1996, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements, indicating that the financial statements were prepared on a going
concern basis that might not be appropriate due to significant operating losses.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 1995, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.


                                           WISS & COMPANY, LLP


Livingston, New Jersey
October 24, 1996
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement 
under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear 
Energy Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 1,470,588.2 
kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride (68.00% U), 1,000,000 kg 
of which is uranium, from Areva Resources Canada, Inc. (Areva 
Resources) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to Eurodif Production in 
Pierrelatte, France. The material, which is currently located at Areva 
Resources, will be transferred to Eurodif Production for enrichment and 
use as fuel in civilian nuclear power programs in the United States and 
France. The material was originally obtained by Areva Resources from 
the Feed Component Substitution Implementing Contract.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: October 1, 2010.

    For the Department of Energy.
Thomas P. D'Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-27500 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1(c)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                                 ONDISPLAY, INC.
                    THIRD RESTATED INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

      The Third Restated Investor Rights Agreement among OnDisplay, Inc.
("OnDisplay") and the investors who are parties thereto is hereby amended as
follows:

      1.    The defined term "Registrable Securities" is amended to include
            shares of Common Stock issued in the private placement that is
            taking place concurrently with the Qualified IPO. The amendment will
            be effected by inserting at the end of clause (2) of Section 2.1(b)
            the phrase "or issued in the private placement occurring
            contemporaneously with the Qualified IPO in December 1999."

      2.    The Special Right of First Refusal is amended to add the following
            new paragraph (c):

                  "(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the
            consummation of the arrangement to reserve 5% of the Qualified IPO
            shares (excluding overallotment option exercise shares) for purchase
            by holders of Series C Preferred Stock shall be conclusively deemed
            to satisfy and fully discharge all of the Company's obligations
            under this Section 3.3, including but not limited to the notice and
            underwriter cutback provisions thereof."

      3.    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

Dated as of December 14, 1999

                                            ONDISPLAY, INC.


                                            By:_________________________________


                                    INVESTORS


Funds                                      Individuals
-----                                      -----------


_____________________________              _____________________________________
                                                         Signature

By:__________________________              _____________________________________
                                                           Print

By:__________________________
#### Eddie James JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAIL ROOM STAFF, Allen Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-30212.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 10, 2003.

Eddie James Jones, pro se, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Eddie James Jones, Louisiana prisoner # 176162, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as *419frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)© & (ii). Jones argues that when the mail room staff at Allen Correctional Center opened his legal mail which had been returned as improperly addressed, they violated his right of access to the courts and hindered his effort to use a procedure for filing confidential grievances. The mail room staff apparently opened Jones’ mail when it was returned to the prison because it was improperly addressed. The prison mail staff did not violate Jones’ right of access to the courts by opening his incoming legal mail as prison officials may open incoming legal mail to inspect it for contraband. *See Brewer v. Wilkinson,*3 F.3d 816, 820-21 (5th Cir.1993). Further, Jones did not allege that he was prejudiced in any way in a legal proceeding or prevented from filing another grievance because the mail room staff opened his legal mail. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 349-51, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996). Therefore, Jones has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint.

Jones’ appeal is without arguable merit and, therefore, is dismissed as frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of his complaint and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Jones is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed *in forma pauperis*in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Spine Care of NJ, P.C., as Assignee of Nohelia Francechi, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Global Liberty Insurance Company of New York, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant.Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharon Bourne-Clark, J.), entered June 14, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, granted the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought to recover on bills for services rendered on December 21, 2016 and December 29, 2016.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought to recover on bills for services rendered on December 21, 2016 and December 29, 2016 are denied.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals, as limited by the brief, from so much of an order of the Civil Court as granted the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought to recover on bills for services rendered on December 21, 2016 and December 29, 2016.</p><p>The branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought to recover on bills for services rendered on December 21, 2016 and December 29, 2016 should have been denied, as the proof submitted by plaintiff failed to establish that the claims had not been timely denied (<a href="../2015/2015_04787.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co.</i>, 25 NY3d 498</a> [2015]), or that defendant had issued timely denial of claim <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>forms that were conclusory, vague or without merit as a matter of law (<a href="../2010/2010_08933.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.</i>, 78 AD3d 1168</a> [2010]; <a href="../2011/2011_51292.htm" target="_blank"><i>Ave T MPC Corp. v Auto One Ins. Co.</i>, 32 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51292[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2011]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, and the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought to recover on bills for services rendered on December 21, 2016 and December 29, 2016 are denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 11, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>