alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance
Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred
W. Wagenhals, Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Fred W. Wagenhals
Fred W. Wagenhals
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2003
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the Company) Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Kevin M. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 3, 2008



|       |  |                                                               
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ GEORGE J. PEDERSEN                                        
|Name:  |  | George J. Pedersen                                            
|Title: |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ KEVIN M. PHILLIPS                                         
|Name:  |  | Kevin M. Phillips                                             
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer                                       



32
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**ANTONIO SIERRA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 184 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal and Pro se Notice to be Heard Before a Judge ar e**  DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            4440
<SECURITIES>                                       972
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                      17569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 30664
<PP&E>                                            4013
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         17783
<OTHER-SE>                                       13942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33649
<SALES>                                           7496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7496
<CGS>                                             4609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1164
<INCOME-TAX>                                       350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
# Sitemap

## August 10, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 08
- August 10, 2014

            - Sol 714 Update on Curiosity from USGS Scientist Ryan Anderson: On Solid Ground
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Metrics for 2020




On December 11, 2019, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future cash awards for 2020 participants, including executive officers, under the Company's Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10-O-2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The Corporate performance criteria and weightings to be used for 2020 under the plan include attaining specified levels of:


		
	•
	Company Adjusted Free Cash Flow (50%)




		
	•
	Company Adjusted EBIT (20%)




		
	•
	Company Revenue (10%)




		
	•
	Quality (20%)




Based on business performance results for 2020 against the targeted levels established for each metric, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award that is earned, which could range between 0% and 200% depending on actual performance achieved relative to the target levels.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 39288 (f rev)

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Philip H. AIKEN

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Upon further review

Decided 11 October 2018

________________________

Military Judge: Patricia A. Gruen.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 13 months, 

and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 9 May 2017 by GCM convened 

at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.

For Appellant: Major Todd M. Swensen, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Captain Michael T. Bunnell, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.

Before HARDING, HUYGEN, and POSCH, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

We have this case for further review after returning the record of trial to 

The Judge Advocate General for remand to the convening authority for new 

post-trial processing and action. United States v. Aiken, No. ACM 39288, 2018 

CCA LEXIS 366 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 20 Jul. 2018) (unpub. op.). New post-trial 

processing and convening authority action have been accomplished.
United States v. Aiken, No. ACM 39288 (f rev)

2

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
#### JOSEPH BARROW v. MORRISTOWN DAILY RECORD.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 10.10**

 

**2006 SENIOR OFFICER INCENTIVE PLAN - A**

 

 

| I. | Trigger Point: After-Tax Return on Beginning Equity1  must be greater than the Peer Group 50 Percentile Return on Equity |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Pre-tax Earnings are adjusted as follows:

 

|   | (A) | Tax-exempt income is grossed up to a fully taxable equivalent. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (B) | Incentive/Expense accrual is added back to pre-tax earnings. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (C) | Trust Preferred Interest is added back to pre-tax earnings. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (D) | Loan Loss Recoveries are added back relative to prior year adjustment. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (E) | Extra-ordinary income and expense not directly associated with operating the Bank, is excluded from pre-tax earnings. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

1Comprehensive Income (Loss) & Goodwill is adjusted out of Beginning Equity.  Trust Preferred Securities are treated as Equity.

 

|   | I. | Pool Formula |
|--------|----|--------------|

 

|   | 1. | Trigger Point must be achieved. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Pool is funded using peer group data derived from BancIntelligence.com (Calculations assume a 35% tax rate): |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (A) | 5% of Pacific Financial’s pretax earnings that place The Company up to the 50 percentile for Pre-tax Return on Equity (rounded up to the next 1⁄4%) for banks between $250 and $750 million. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (B) | 10% of the pretax earnings above the 50 percentile and less than the Pre-tax Return on Beginning Equity (rounded up to the next 1⁄4%) that places The Company among the top 10% of banks between $250 and $750 million. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (C) | 15% of the amount of pretax earnings that places the Company above the 90 percentile for Return on Equity (rounded up to the next 1⁄4%) for banks between $250 and $750 million. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

1

 

----
II 

Calendar No. 328

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1746

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ‘‘Brian C. Hickey 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, 

as the ‘‘Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BRIAN C. HICKEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, 
2

•S 1746 RS 

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian 

2 C. Hickey Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Brian C. Hickey Post 

7 Office Building. 

Calendar No. 328

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1746

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 339 Hicksville Road in 

Bethpage, New York, as the ‘‘Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1718 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 333
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1718

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

 Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

                            October 27, 2003

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JAMES B. PEARSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Senator James B. Pearson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator 
James B. Pearson Post Office.

                                                       Calendar No. 333

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1718

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 27, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 11.2

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

     
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                              December 31,
                                                         1996            1995
                                                     -----------     -----------
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                  12,903,047      11,290,318
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
  Stock Options                                          551,231         504,206
  Warrants                                                21,870          45,020
  Preferred Stock                                           --         1,000,000
                                                     -----------     -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   13,476,148      12,839,544
                                                     ===========     ===========

Net Income                                           $ 1,568,133     $   877,775
                                                     ===========     ===========


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                     $      0.12     $      0.07
                                                     ===========     ===========


     All share amounts and per share data have been restated to reflect the
      two-for-one stock split effected as a stock dividend on May 28, 1996.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VINCENTE JIMENEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1343

[October 14, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF003175A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant raises four issues on appeal, only one of which has 

merit. We affirm his conviction for aggravated battery and his sentence, 

but we agree that his judgment improperly includes the words “PRIOR 

CONVICTION” in the description of the crime and improperly references 

section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we remand for the trial 

court to correct the judgment by removing these references. The defendant 

need not be present for the entry of the corrected judgment.

We affirm with respect to the remaining issues.

Remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
32-1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX
CREDITS III, L.P.; (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER,
JR.


Wilfred
N. Cooper, Jr.


President
and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: August
6, 2010
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Martek Biosciences Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:  a)
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2005
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; andb)
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 14, 2005 By /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr. Henry Linsert, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Martek Biosciences Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 28, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00012-CV
GEORGE BRYAN, Appellant V. WILLIAM BECKER INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM E . BECKER FAM ILY TRUST AND SCOPE AUTOMOTIVE, L.L.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-08362

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, P edersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court is appellant’s April 22, 2021 unopposed motion to dismiss

the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

210012F.P05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GEORGE BRYAN, Appellant

No. 05-21-00012-CV V.

WILLIAM BECKER INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM E. BECKER FAMILY TRUST AND SCOPE AUTOMOTIVE, L.L.C., Appellees On Appeal from the 95th District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-08362. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 28, 2021