alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         834,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  451,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,286,058
<PP&E>                                      15,989,610
<DEPRECIATION>                               (412,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,862,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,723,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,862,860
<SALES>                                        486,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               492,874
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                408,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 30, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DONALD ALTON HARPER, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

P. URBANO, P.A.; NORMAN S.

ROSENTHAL, M.D.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1245

(D.C. No. 1:07-CV-00750-REB-KMT)

ORDER

On June 30, 2010, the court directed the appellant to pay the filing fee for

this appeal within 21 days and advised him that failure to pay would result in

dismissal of this appeal. The fee has not been paid. Therefore, this appeal is

dismissed for lack of prosecution, pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 3.3 (B) and 10th Cir. R.

42.1. 

To the extent the appendix submitted by the appellant includes an implied

request for reconsideration, that request is denied as moot. 

Appellate Case: 10-1245 Document: 01018468668 Date Filed: 07/30/2010 Page: 1 
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1245 Document: 01018468668 Date Filed: 07/30/2010 Page: 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129596 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 129596 

 COA: 262850 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

Wayne CC: 03-013127-01 

v 

RAQUEL NICOLE KOPSOLIAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters 

Reply to Attn of: 

W

G

a

e

s

ne

h

ra

in

l 

g

L

to

a

n

w 

, 

Pr

DC 

acti

2

c

0

e 

54

G

6

ro

-0

u

0

p 

01 

July 15, 2021 • 

TO: 

FROM: 

Distribution 

Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Coalition for 

Deep Space Exploration Reception on July 22, 2021 

On July 22, 2021, the Coalition for Deep Space Exploration (Coalition), a nonprofit 

organization under 501 ( c )( 6) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a reception at the Sonoma 

Restaurant and Wine Bar, Washington, DC, from 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. The Coalition is not 

registered and does not engage in lobbying activities. The event is to provide a venue for 

informal discussion for representatives from industry, the U.S. legislative branch, and others 

interested in deep space human exploration and space science. The Coalition is in control of 

the planning, organizing and issuing of invitations for this event. 

Approximately 200 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, representatives from 

the U.S. Congress, industry, and scientific organizations. The estimated cost of the event, 

including all food and beverages, is approximately $50 per person. Attendance at this event 

will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I 

find that the event meets the requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 

C.F.R. § 2635.204(g). 

NASA employees, including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a 

matter affecting the interests of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the 

event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency's interest in attendance outweighs any 

concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the 

performance of their duties. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the Coalition, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or 

administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local a

NASA ~ethics office as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to Ov;;z:._ons appropriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Green stone
#### Iseley *v.*The State.

Where an indictment for gaming charges the defendant with winning or losing with several persons, &c., proof that the winning or losing was with a part of those persons is not sufficient.

An indictment for gaming may be sustained against the person who made the bet, though another person furnished the money.

ERROR to the *Carroll*Circuit Court.

Perkins, J.

Indictment for gaming; trial by jury; verdict, guilty; and judgment accordingly. The indictment contains two counts. The first presents “that *Philip Iseley,*late of said county, on the first day of *March,*eighteen hundred and forty-four, with force and arms at the county aforesaid, by then and there unlawfully playing at and betting upon a certain unlawful game and wager commonly called a shooting match, with *Henry Birney, Handel Purcell, George TV.*Birney,” and several others, naming a part of them, and alleging the names of the others to be unknown, did unlawfully win a certain sum of money, to wit, the sum of five dollars, contrary to the form of the statute, &c. The second count is like the first, except it charges a losing instead of a winning. ■

On the trial, the Court instructed the jury “that it was not necessary for the state, in order to sustain this prosecution, to show that the defendant either won or lost of or to all the persons named in said indictment, but that it was only necessary for her to prove a winning or losing from or to one or more of them.” This instruction was wrong. The counts in the indictment charge a joint winning and a joint losing. The proof must correspond.

The Court further instructed the jury “that it was not necessary for the state to prove that the defendant invested his own money in the shooting match, but it was sufficient for her to show that he shot according to the rules of the match, while another person furnished the money to enable him to do so.” As the evidence is not upon the record, we cannot judge of the pertinency or correctness of this instruction. It seems to us a case might exist,in which it would be law. If the defendant actually made the bet, we think he might be liable even though another person furnished the money.

*404*D. Mace*and *A. M.*Crane, for the plaintiff.

*A. A. Hammond*and *J. H. Bradley,*for the state.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10(f)(4)

                        NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
                            FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS

                               THIRD AMENDMENT

    Battle Mountain Gold Company, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
having established the Battle Mountain Gold Company Nonqualified Stock Option
Plan for Outside Directors, as originally adopted and currently in effect
(the "Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section 12 thereof to amend
said Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective February 2, 1999, as follows:

1.  The second sentence of Paragraph 2 is hereby amended to increase the
    number of options granted to newly elected outside Directors by deleting
    the number "5,000" and replacing it with "10,000".

2.  The third sentence of Paragraph 2 is hereby amended to increase the
    number of options granted annually to outside Directors by deleting the
    number "1,500" and replacing it with "5,000".

Effective as of February 2, 1999.


                                       BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD COMPANY



                                       By: /s/ Stan M. Haley
                                           ----------------------
                                           Name:  Stan M. Haley
                                           Title: Vice President,
                                                  Human Resources



ATTEST:

By: /s/ Greg V. Etter
    --------------------------------------
    Name:  Greg V. Etter
    Title: Vice President, General Counsel
           and Corporate Secretary
Order entered October 2 4 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 01070 - CV IN RE LILIANA SANCHEZ MENDEZ , Relator Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 21 - 18680

O RDER Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida

- Kipness, and Justice Smith Before the Court is relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus. We request real part y in interest and respondent to file a response, if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by November 1, 2022

. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 14, 2003


                                             BY: /s/  Paul S. Shipman
                                                 Paul S. Shipman
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Lockheed Martin Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. W912DY-10-D-0042 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58757

Marcia G. Madsen, Esq. Cameron S. Hamrick, Esq.

Mayer Brown LLP Washington, DC Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Steven W. Feldman, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers,

Huntsville Center ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed withprejudice. Dated: 2 January 2014 

## ARKN.STEMPER Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58757, Appeal ofLockheed Martin Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Redhook
Ale Brewery, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul S. Shipman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: March 31, 2006

                                               BY: /s/ Paul S. Shipman
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                      Paul S. Shipman
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

October 9, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1720

       To provide for Federal court proceedings in Plano, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To provide for Federal court proceedings in Plano, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS IN PLANO, TEXAS.

    Section 124(c)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``and Plano'' after ``held at Sherman''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman F. Swanton,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| /s/ Norman F. Swanton         |         |
|-------------------------------|--------------|
| Norman F. Swanton             |         |
| *Chairman of the Board*       | *** *** |
| *And Chief Executive Officer* | *** *** |
|                          |         |
| May 6, 2009              |         |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32-2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS III, L.P.; (the “Partnership”) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk , Vice President-Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ MELANIE R. WENK                                              | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Melanie R. Wenk                                                  | 
|Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.



Date: August 14, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0380

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SERENITY ALANA MANN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 26, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 20 2024

05/20/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0380
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1777 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1777

             For the relief of Marcela Silva do Nascimento.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 23, 2003

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Marcela Silva do Nascimento.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCELA SILVA DO NASCIMENTO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Marcela Silva do Nascimento 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Marcela Silva do Nascimento enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), Marcela Silva do Nascimento shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for 
adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Marcela Silva do Nascimento, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```