alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commonwealth *v.*Correll.

Criminal Prosecution — Taking in Obedience of Command of a Superior Officer.

A subordinate is not liable to *criminal*or *penal prosecution,*by taking of property under orders from a superior military officer.

APPEAL EROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT

June *7,*1866.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge. Peters :

Appellee took the horse from Armstrong in obedience to the command of his superior officer and delivered him to the officer to whom he was ordered to deliver him, and he was, as the evidence conduces to show, put into the service of the government.

We are not, therefore, prepared to say that appellee by the execution of an order of his superior officer in precisely the manner he was commanded to. do thereby subjected himself to a *criminal or penal prosecution.*

Whether or not he would be responsible in a civil action to the party who was deprived of his property by him, although he did it in obedience to orders, is a question not now before us and about which we express no ojtinion.

The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                             739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   739
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,206
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       739
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,466)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2000

To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2003

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third 

time, and passed 

A BILL

To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer 

research for 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR 

4 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

5 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

Æ
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Division**

----

**David Woodswith Frank O'Brien, Tim Brandt, Lennie Waugh, Ken MacTaggart, Andrew Vignaux, Ian Roberts, Robin Wheeler, Rob McCray, Mike Jetzer, Alexander Turhanov, Ben Feist and Johannes Kemppanen**

----

****

----

Apollo Lunar Surface Journal

The journal presently covers eleven human flights of the Apollo program, relating the parts of the missions not on the lunar surface. As a "living document" it will continue to grow and evolve.

----

- Foreword  by David R. Scott, Commander, Apollo 15
- Bibliography and Links
- Acknowledgements
- Journal Preparation

Apollo Documentation

#### Journal Essays

- S-II Insulation  - Mike Jetzer
- Apollo Lunar Quarantine  - Johannes Kemppanen
- Ejectable camera pods  - Wes Oleszewski
- The Apollo On-board Computers  - Phill Parker
- Lunar Orbit Insertion  - Frank O'Brien
- Lunar Orbit Rendezvous  - Frank O'Brien
- The SIM Bay Cameras  - Robin Wheeler
- Apollo Launch Windows  - Robin Wheeler
- Clouds Across The Moon  - an analysis of Earth photography on Apollo by Paul White

----

Apollo 11 Flight Journal
**Analysis of Handwritten Notes Inside the Cabin of Apollo 11 Spacecraft CM-107 "Columbia"at theSmithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Washington D.C.*The sextant mount with Michael Collins's tribute to the spacecraft. (NASM image)***

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### Unless otherwise stated, these files are copyright © 1998 - 2017. W. David Woods.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      173
<ALLOWANCES>                                        22
<INVENTORY>                                        195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   749
<PP&E>                                           3,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,664
<SALES>                                            427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   427
<CGS>                                               20
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       20
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,484)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00316

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.F., MINOR CHILD,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 02694 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Texas Rules of Judicial Administration require this court to “ensure that the appeal is brought to final disposition . . . [w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.” T EX

. R. J UD

. A DM

. 6.2(a). This accelerated appeal from the termination of appellant’s parental rights has been pending since the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on May 1, 2014

. Appellant is represented on appeal by appointed counsel , M r

. James B. Peplinski

. Appellant’s brief was originally due on June 9 , 201 4

. T his court has granted Mr. Peplinski one extension of time until June 29, 2014

, and informed Mr. Peplinksi that no further extensions of time would be granted.

On June 29, 2014, Mr. Peplinski request ed another extension of time until July 6, 2014. The motion is GRANTED and Mr

. Peplinski is hereby ORDERED to file appellant’s brief no later than July 6 , 2014

. If Mr. Peplinski fails to file appellant’s brief by this date, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a). No further extensions of time will be considered or granted.

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Peplinski by certif ied mail, return receipt requested, and by United States mail.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
2020

20 Years on the International Space Station

Certicate of Participation

2020 Virtual Sweatin’ with the Station

Presented to:

Date: Location:

In recognition of participation in 91 minutes and

12 seconds of continous exercise for one

Earth orbit of the International Space Station.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov G–558662
X-29

• Two X-29’s were built and flown by NASA and the U.S. Air Force between 1984 and 1991.

• The airplane tested a new wing design and ways to use computers to help the pilot fly.

• The airplane was built with materials other than metal.

Want to learn more about the X-29? Go to: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/news/FactSheets/FS-008-DFRC.html

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Matthew Medeiros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of SonicWALL, Inc.








Date:
      March 5, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Matthew MedeirosName:
            Matthew
      MedeirosTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer








I, Robert
Selvi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
SonicWALL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of SonicWALL, Inc.








Date:
      March 5, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Robert SelviName:
            Robert
      SelviTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 12, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL LEE HARRIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

ROBERT MURPHY, Wyoming

Department of Corrections State

Penitentiary Warden; ROBERT

LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of

Corrections Director; CORPORAL

KLASSMEN, Wyoming Department of

Corrections State Penitentiary Property

Officer, 

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-8024

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00251-WCB)

(D. of Wyoming)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-8024 Document: 01018476472 Date Filed: 08/12/2010 Page: 1
2 min read

# Oklahoma, Texas Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Station

### Claire A. O'Shea

#### Public Affairs Specialist

Aug 10, 2023

RELEASE

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

Students from Oklahoma and Texas will have separate opportunities this week to hear from NASA astronauts aboard the International Space Station.

***Editor’s Note: This advisory was updated on August 11, 2023, to correctly reflect the contacts for registering for the two events.***

Students from Oklahoma and Texas will have separate opportunities to hear from NASA astronauts aboard the International Space Station.

The two space-to-Earth calls will air live Monday, Aug. 14, on NASA Television, the NASA app, and the agency’s website.

At 12:10 p.m. EDT, NASA astronauts Steve Bowen and Frank Rubio will answer prerecorded questions from students in Kingfisher, Oklahoma. The event, hosted by Kingfisher High School, will connect the students’ knowledge of agriculture to plant science on station and STEM career opportunities. U.S. Rep. Frank Lucas, chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, will give opening and closing remarks.

Media interested in covering the event should contact Heather Vaughn at: Heather.Vaughan@mail.house.gov or 202-680-8577 no later than 5 p.m. Aug. 11.

Bowen and Rubio also will answer prerecorded questions from students at the Odyssey Academy in Galveston, Texas at 1:50 p.m. Through the event, the academy hopes to attract a diverse group of students to STEM and increase participation in STEM activities.

Media interested in covering the event should contact Keri Lilley at: keri@kerilley.com or 281-250-2967 no later than 5 p.m. Aug. 11.

For more than 22 years, astronauts have continuously lived and worked aboard the space station, testing technologies, performing science, and developing the skills needed to explore farther from Earth. Astronauts living in space aboard the orbiting laboratory communicate with NASA’s Mission Control Center in Houston through the Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) Near Space Network.

Important research and technology investigations taking place aboard the International Space Station benefit people on Earth and lay the groundwork for future exploration.

As part of Artemis, NASA will send astronauts to the Moon to prepare for future human exploration of Mars. Inspiring the next generation of explorers – the Artemis Generation – ensures America will continue to lead in space exploration and discovery.

See videos and lesson plans highlighting research on the International Space Station at:

https://www.nasa.gov/stemonstation

-end-

Katherine BrownHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1288katherine.m.brown@nasa.govSandra Jones Johnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111sandra.p.jones@nasa.gov
Exhibit 32.3

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

    (i)          the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

    (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: September 9, 2008 |
|--------------------------|

 

| /s/ Douglas G. Markham  |
|-------------------------|
| Douglas G. Markham      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
No. 87-6369.

#### Malfatto *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIE LI ZHEN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71868

Agency No. A088-459-745

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 14, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

 Jie Li Zhen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is

FILED

OCT 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s

factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination,

based on the inconsistencies between Zhen’s testimony and his asylum application

regarding whether he was ever arrested, detained, and beaten by the police in

China. See id. at 1046-47 (“Although insistencies no longer need to go to the heart

of the petitioner’s claim, when an inconsistency is at the heart of the claim it

doubtless is of great weight.”). We lack jurisdiction to consider Zhen’s

contentions made for the first time in his opening brief that he may not have been

familiar with the content of his declaration or that it may have been mis-translated. 

See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks

jurisdiction to consider issues that have not been exhausted administratively). In

the absence of credible testimony, Zhen’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Zhen’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony the

BIA found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the conclusion

2 12-71868
that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to China. See id. at

1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 12-71868
1 min read

# Hypergolic Rotating Detonation Rocket Propulsion with Low Pressure-loss Injection and Advanced Thermal Management

### Loura Hall

Jan 14, 2020

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Raymond Spearrin***University of California, Los Angeles*

ESI19 Raymond Spearrin Quadchart

Detonation-based propulsion systems have potential for increased performance and reduced mass leading to extended spacecraft mission durations. In-space rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE) systems using space-storable propellants may offer a relatively short overall timeline to technical and flight readiness compared to launch systems given the smaller scale and typical pulsed-mode operation. Based on work with other propellants, critical technology limitations noted to-date include (1) under-mixed propellant injection yielding relatively low wave speeds, (2) extreme heat transfer and associated lack of chamber durability, and (3) undesirably high pressure-loss feed systems required to avoid injection backflow and to shorten propellant refresh timescales for continuous operation, which offset the pressure gain associated with detonation combustion.  All three of these issues can be related to injector design. In this project, we will explore novel additively-manufacturable injection schemes aimed at enhancing propellant pre-mixing, film cooling of chamber walls, and minimizing feed system pressure loss. This parametric injection analysis will be conducted via a coupled computational and experimental approach, with hypergolic space-storable propellant combinations. The effort aims to improve fundamental understanding of rotating detonation engine operation and provide a pathway to technology transition.

**Back to ESI 2019**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      36,540,545
<SECURITIES>                                25,685,126
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,435,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,076,443
<PP&E>                                      12,899,187
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,660,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,879,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,683,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    540,795
<COMMON>                                       153,038
<OTHER-SE>                                  77,583,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,879,492
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,182,252
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,527,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,147,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,147,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,147,334)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)


</TABLE>