alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1991 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1991

 To require the reimbursement of members of the Armed Forces or their 
 family members for the costs of protective body armor purchased by or 
               on behalf of members of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2003

 Mr. Daschle (for Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy)) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the reimbursement of members of the Armed Forces or their 
 family members for the costs of protective body armor purchased by or 
               on behalf of members of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF PROTECTIVE BODY ARMOR PURCHASED BY 
              OR ON BEHALF OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Reimbursement Required.--The Secretary of the military 
department concerned shall reimburse a member of the Armed Forces, or a 
family member of a member of the Armed Forces, for the cost of 
protective body armor that was purchased by such member of the Armed 
Forces or family member, by or on behalf of such member of the Armed 
Forces, for the use of such member of the Armed Forces in wartime 
conditions.
    (b) Availability of Funds.--Amounts available to the military 
departments shall be available for the reimbursements authorized by 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 31, 2010

s0324

Order 

March 31, 2010

140264

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140264

COA: 287420

Kent CC: 07-006211-FC

JOSEPH RYAN CARLSON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE only that part of the judgment of the 

Court of Appeals that vacates the defendant’s convictions of and sentences for firstdegree criminal sexual conduct based on oral penetration of the victim and REMAND 

this case to the Court of Appeals. The challenged evidence that was found to be arguably 

admissible by the Court of Appeals supported a finding of cunnilingus, which, by 

definition, is penetration. See MCL 750.520a(r). On remand, the court is to consider 

whether that evidence was admissible under the circumstances of this case. See People v 

Meeboer, 439 Mich 310 (1992). The court shall also determine whether a remand for a 

new trial is appropriate pursuant to Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33; 109 S Ct 285; 102 L 

Ed 2d 265 (1988). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1694 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1694

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide veterans who participated in certain 
  Department of Defense chemical and biological warfare testing to be 
   provided health care for illness without requirement for proof of 
                          service-connection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2003

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide veterans who participated in certain 
  Department of Defense chemical and biological warfare testing to be 
   provided health care for illness without requirement for proof of 
                          service-connection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care for Veterans of Project 
112/Project SHAD Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE TO VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 
              CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL 
              WARFARE TESTING.

    Section 1710(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following 
        new subparagraph:
    ``(E) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), a veteran who participated 
in a test conducted by the Department of Defense Deseret Test Center as 
part of a program for chemical and biological warfare testing from 1962 
through 1973 (including the program designated as `Project Shipboard 
Hazard and Defense (SHAD)' and related land-based tests) is eligible 
for hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care under 
subsection (a)(2)(F) for any illness, notwithstanding that there is 
insufficient medical evidence to conclude that such illness is 
attributable to such testing.'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``paragraph (1)(C) or 
        (1)(D)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (C), (D), or (E) of 
        paragraph (1)''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (B);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (C) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(D) in the case of care for a veteran described in 
        paragraph (1)(E), after December 31, 2005.''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1543

_____________________________

STEPHANIE ROBERTSON NATIONS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

March 1, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the report of Taylor Madison Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lucien Lallouz, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October  18,  2004

/s/ Lucien  Lallouz
-------------------
Lucien  Lallouz
Chief  Executive  Officer

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PHON-NET.COM, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         154,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,971
<PP&E>                                       1,380,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                (654,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,084,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,474,514
<OTHER-SE>                                 (11,580,681)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,084,346
<SALES>                                          6,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,547,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,540,842)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### MICHAEL DESKOVICK v. WATER POLICY AND SUPPLY COUNCIL.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 157 *N. J. Super.*89)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138111

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138111 COA: 286873 Oakland CC: 07-008725-AR KAREN CHABAN BENTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 04-3969

________________

United States of America,

Appellee,

v.

Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar,

Appellant.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Iowa.

[UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: September 12, 2005 

 Filed: December 2, 2005

________________

Before ARNOLD, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

________________

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar of one count of conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine and marijuana and two counts each of distribution of

methamphetamine and marijuana, including the distribution of more than 50 grams

of methamphetamine. The district court1

 sentenced him to the statutory mandatory
-2-

minimum of 20 years’ imprisonment based on the jury’s drug-quantity finding and

his prior felony conviction. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Montejano-Quintanar

appeals his conviction and sentence, raising a host of arguments. We have carefully

reviewed the record and find Montejano-Quintanar’s claims of error to be wholly

without merit. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
No. 07-14-00391-CR

Abel Cervantes

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 364th District Court

 of Lubbock County

June 9, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 9, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 11.1

# RIMAGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

Basic net income per common share is determined by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net income per common share is determined by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common share equivalents outstanding, unless the result is
anti-dilutive. A total of 2,969 and 10,827 assumed conversion shares for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2004, respectively, and 4,236 and 8,100 assumed conversion shares for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003,
respectively, were excluded from the net income per share computation as their effect is anti-dilutive. The following is a summary
of the weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed conversion shares:

|                                                    | Three months endedSeptember 30, |  | Nine months endedSeptember 30,
|--------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|
|Shares outstanding at end of period                 |                                 |  |                               
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               
|Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |                                 |  |                               
|Weighted average shares of assumed                  |                                 | 
|conversion shares                                   |                                 |  |                               
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               
|Weighted average shares of common stock and         |                                 | 
|assumed conversion shares                           |                                 |  |                               
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               
|Net income                                          |                                 |  | $                             
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               
|Basic net income per common share                   |                                 |  | $                             
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               
|Diluted net income per common share                 |                                 |  | $                             
|                                                    |                                 |  |                               



---
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY KEVIN SLICKER, a/k/a

Kevin Slicker, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-5008 

 (D.C. No. 4:09-CR-00081-PJC-1) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 46.3(B).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-5008 Document: 01018380401 Date Filed: 03/09/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT
32.1









Section 1350 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer









In connection with the quarterly report of Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
P, Baker, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
report.









Date: 
      May 3, 2010
            /s/ Douglas
      P.
      Baker
              Douglas
      P. Baker
              Chief
      Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN MOORE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

GLAXO SMITHKLINE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1302

(D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00759-ZLW)

ORDER

By order filed on July 21, 2010, appellant was directed to show cause, on or

before August 11, 2010, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction due to the late filing of the notice of appeal. The order advised

appellant that failure to respond would subject the appeal to dismissal for lack of

prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to file a response. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed

for lack of prosecution. See 10th Cir. R. 42.1. 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by: 

 Christine Van Coney

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1302 Document: 01018483968 Date Filed: 08/25/2010 Page: 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7220]

Pursuant to Section 7041 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, Pub. L. 111-117) (“the Act”), I hereby determine that it is in the national interest of the United States to waive Section 7041 of the Act, and hereby waive this restriction.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: February 22, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-27665 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                             116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,326
<PP&E>                                           3,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,561
<SALES>                                          3,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,436
<CGS>                                            2,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH EARL KNIGHT.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JAUNTY DRESS SHOP, INC. v. FREDERICK ZISSU.

May 16, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.