alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.02**
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Peter L. Buzy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Martek Biosciences Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b)  [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 9, 2005
By /s/ Peter L. Buzy      
Peter L. Buzy
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Infectious Diseases 
(BSC, OID)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

    Time and Date: 10:30 a.m.-12 p.m., November 15, 2010.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: Open to the public, the toll free dial in number is 
1(800)369-1755 with a pass code of 8481618.
    Purpose: The BSC, OID, shall advise the Secretary, Department of 
Health and Human Services; the Director, CDC; the Director, OID; and 
the Directors of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory 
Diseases, the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious 
Diseases, and the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, 
and TB Prevention, CDC, concerning strategies, goals, and priorities 
for the programs and research within the national centers and monitor 
the overall strategic direction and focus of OID and the national 
centers.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will involve the presentation 
of a draft document being developed to advance CDC's infectious disease 
priorities. A subsequent meeting to solicit further discussion and 
input on the document from the board is currently scheduled for 
December 6, 2010 and will be announced at a future date.
    Requests for a copy of the draft document may be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8befefe2efe2e5fbfeffcbe8efe8a5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f5b5b565b56514f4a4b7f5c5b5c11585049">[email protected]</span></a> prior to the teleconference.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Robin Moseley, CDC, OID, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D-10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 
(404) 639-4461.
    The Director, Management and Analysis Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign the Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: October 22, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-27462 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Jas. W. Bunting et al. *v.*Hy. O. Maraman.

Admissions in an Answer Cannot be Changed by Proof.

What is admitted in an answer to a petition cannot be changed by the defendant’s own witnesses.

APPEAL PROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

September 28, 1866.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The appellee Martha, as dowress, was entitled to a portion of the rent for which the entire tract, including her allotment, was leased. The pleadings authorized the assessment, as made, for three years.' What the appellant’s answer admitted could not be changed by his own witness, nor has either testimony or argument sátisíactorily explained away the appellant’s admission of the third year which the commissioner assessed.

• The commissioner charged rent only for the thirty-six acres as ■ allotted with its improvements, and this was right, and the amount' assessed was authorized by the proof.

By the authority of the Revised Statutes interest on the amount of each year’s rent from the time it became due was chargeable, and properly charged.

As against the appellee Martha, who was allotted less land in consequence of the improvements, the appellant was not entitled to compensation for making any of them. If he is entitled to' anything on that account he must look to his lessors.

Having thus disposed of the whole case and found no error, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed. "
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stonepath Group, Inc. for the periodended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Jason F. Totah, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert Arovas, President and ChiefFinancial Officer, of the Company, certify that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: March 31, 2006       By: /s/ Jason F. Totah         Jason F. Totah       By: /s/ Robert Arovas         Robert ArovasThis certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to StonepathGroup, Inc. and will be retained by Stonepath Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Senior
Vice-President  and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/Thomas J. Riha.
------------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 26, 2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD A. ZALEWSKI.

July 11, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                        THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS
                                OF ULTRAFEM, INC.

                            Adopted December 16, 1996

Article III, Section 3.14 of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of Ultrafem, Inc.
is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows.

            Section 3.14 Committees of the Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors, by resolution adopted by a majority of the entire Board of Directors,
may designate one or more committees, each consisting of one or more directors.
The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members
of any such committee. Such alternate members may replace any absent member or
members at any meeting of such committee. Each committee (including the members
thereof) shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and may keep
minutes of its meetings and report the same to the Board of Directors. Except as
otherwise provided by law, each such committee, to the extent provided in the
resolution establishing it, shall have and may exercise all the authority of the
Board of Directors with respect to all matters. However, no such committee shall
have power or authority in reference to the following matters: (i) approving or
adopting, or recommending to the stockholders, any action or matter expressly
required by the Delaware General Corporation Law to be submitted to stockholders
for approval or (ii) adopting, amending or repealing the By-Laws.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Reply to Attn of:

John F. Kennedy Space Center

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

CC

December 2, 2021

TO: All NASA Civil Servants

FROM: CC/Chief Counsel

SUBJECT: National Space Club Florida Committee Celebrate Space Awards Banquet, 

December 10, 2021

The Florida Committee of the National Space Club (NSCFL), a non-profit organization under 

501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a Celebrate Space Banquet event at the 

Radisson Resort at the Port - Convention Center on Friday, December 10, 2021. This event 

is hosted by NSCFL, which helps further its missions to provide information on space 

activities, promote space leadership, stimulate advancement of space applications, sponsor 

educational activities, and provide recognition for contributions to advancements in aerospace 

science, operations, research, and education. Approximately 250 guests, including corporate 

executives, representatives of aerospace contractors and other organizations, and 

representatives of state and Federal government will be in attendance. Tickets to the dinner, 

valued at $50 for each attendee, are being offered to NASA KSC personnel at no cost. 

 

I find that the Celebrate Space Banquet meets the requirements of a “widely attended 

gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g). Consequently, I conclude that NASA's 

interest in its employees and a guest attending this event outweighs any concern that such free 

attendance may, or may appear to, improperly influence any NASA personnel in the 

performance of their official duties. 

 

Attendance at the Celebrate Space event will allow NASA representatives to establish an 

Agency presence at an event celebrating work done by the NSCFL to stimulate young people 

in the aerospace science and research careers. Attendance will also allow NASA personnel 

an opportunity to discuss matters of interest with a diverse group of other guests. Through 

attendance, employees will be able to disseminate information on NASA's ongoing activities 

and to demonstrate support for the contributions of the American space industry. 

 

 

 

 
2

NASA employees whose duties may substantially affect NSCFL such as by way of 

procurement duties, should seek an individual determination pursuant to 

5 C.F.R. § 2635.205(g)(3)(i) regarding participation in this event from their local ethics 

counselor. 

 

In addition, please note that some NASA contractors may be providing sponsorship for this 

event and purchasing tables at which NSCFL may seat other attendees. To avoid the 

appearance of a conflict of interest, NASA employees who attend the event should avoid 

sitting at a table sponsored by a contractor with whom they are closely and currently involved 

or expect to be involved within the next few months, (e.g, by way of source selection or 

contract administration duties). 

Daniel P. Shaver 

Agency Designee 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DANIEL SHAVER

Digitally signed by DANIEL 

SHAVER

Date: 2021.12.02 13:36:05 -05'00'
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6071

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARIO FITZGERALD PETTIFORD,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cr-00005-WO-1; 1:10-cv-00147-WO-PTS)

Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 20, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Fitzgerald Pettiford, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Fitzgerald Pettiford seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Pettiford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Pettiford’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Den i ed ; Supplemental and Concurring

Memorandum Opinion s filed February 3 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00875

- CV

IN RE WILMA REYNOLDS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 48170

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION

I agree that mandamus relief should be denied. I write separately, however, to emphasize the Texas Legislature has provided clearly that the gamesmanship that appears to be at play in this matter need not be tolerated.2

Pursuant to section 30.016(d) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, mandamus relief is not available to review the denial of a tertiary recusal motion. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 30.016(d). A “‘tertiary recusal motion’ means a third or subsequent motion for recusal or disqualific ation filed against a

district court

. . . by the same party in a case.” Id . § 30.016(a). The statute does not permit a party to start over in its count by invoking a different rule or statute governing the identity of the presiding judge. The objection to an assignment of an unelected judge provided in the Government Code is in the nature of a motion to recuse or disqualify. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. Ashworth , 943 S.W.2d 436, 440
(Tex. 1997) (“Section 74.053 clearly is intended to give parties the right to veto the assignment of certain former judges.”); see also Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.053

. Surely the Legislature did not intend to give parties more protection against certain former judge s than those whose impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

I would f

ind that Ms. Reynolds’ motions were subject to CPRC 30.016

, none of Judge Walker ’s rulings denying motions to recuse or disqualify is subject

to mandamus relief

, and the impositi on of sanctions under 30.016(c) was not an
abuse of discretion for which manda mus relief would lie

.

/s/ Martha Hill Jamison Justice

Panel c onsists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan ( Donovan , J., majority)

.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    Exhibit 27.1
                                 Worldtex, Inc.

THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM WORLDTEX,
INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,812
<INVENTORY>                                     55,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,990
<PP&E>                                         150,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,451
<BONDS>                                        186,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   323,036
<SALES>                                        195,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,084
<CGS>                                          159,174
<T0TAL-COSTS>                                  159,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,838
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13

        

</TABLE>
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN

fighting to fly

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

READING RESPONSE & COMPREHENSION CHOICE BOARD

VISUALIZATION

Imagine one of the Tuskegee Squadron’s flights during WWII. Create 

a poster that would celebrate the 

Tuskegee Airmen’s accomplishments. 

Include as many details from the 

story as you can.

INTERESTING FACT

Explain the most important thing 

you learned from The Tuskegee Airmen’s story. Why did it stand out to 

you? Cite evidence from the text.

ANALYZING

Why do you think the title of this 

story was called “Fighting to Fly?” 

Use textural evidence from the story 

to help explain your reason.

OPINION

What is your opinion about the 

Tuskegee Airmen serving as an inspiration for civil rights? Do you agree 

or disagree? 

SUMMARIZATION

Create a list of the most important 

events of the story that took place 

from first to last. Summarize these 

events in a well-written paragraph.

VOCABULARY

Pick 5 vocabulary words that are 

important to understanding the Tuskegee Airmen’s Story. Create a word 

cloud with these words to visually 

convey a theme of the story. 

CRITIQUING

What additional illustrations or pictures would help to tell the story of 

the Tuskegee Airmen better?

WHAT I LEARNED?

What are 4 new things you learned 

from reading the Tuskegee Airmen’s 

story?

MAKING CONNECTIONS

What characteristics or traits made 

the Tuskegee Airmen successful? Do 

you share any of them? If not, which 

characteristic do you most admire?

TWEET IT!

Write an imaginary Tweet conversation between yourself and one of the 

Tuskegee pilots about a key event in 

the story.

JOURNAL ENTRY

Create a journal entry as a Tuskegee 

pilot for their first day of training and 

a morning of a flight during WWII.

3,2,1

Identify 3 things you learned, 2 

things you have questions about, and 

1 reaction after reading the Tuskegee 

Airmen’s Story.