alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
M.G.R., Inc. d/b/a Air Plus Limited, Distribution Services, Inc.,
  and Contract Air, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-64452 and No. 333-91240) and the registration statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-74918 and No. 333-103439) of Stonepath Group, Inc. of our
report dated September 24, 2001, with respect to the combined statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows of M.G.R., Inc. d/b/a Air Plus Limited, Distribution Services, Inc., and
Contract Air, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Stonepath Group, Inc.



                                   /s/ KPMG LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 19, 2004
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated May 5, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 476 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-236433) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 5, 2020
#### Robbins *v.*Robbins and Others.

The widow of a man against whom judgments existed at the time of the marriage, is entitled to dower (in the land of which he was seised during coverture) subject to the judgments.

ERROR to the *Parke*Probate Court.

Dewey, J.

This was a petition by *Mary E. Robbins*to the Probate Court of *Parke*county for the assignment of dower. The petition sets out the marriage of the petitioner with *Moses Robbins,*his decease, and his seisin and possession during coverture, and at the time of .his death, of several tracts of land, describing them, which he held in fee-simple. The petition makes the necessary averments as to demanding assignment of dower, &c.; and makes the heirs of *Moses Robbins*defendants. They appeared by guardian *ad litem,*and put in a general answer requiring proof of the matters contained in the petition. The administrator of *Moses Robbins*was also, at his own instance, made a party jo the cause. He filed a plea to the petition setting forth that, at the time of the marriage of the petitioner with *Moses Robbins,*and before, there were several judgments against him amounting to more than all the land whereof he died seised and possessed was worth, and that he had no other property except land; and that the judgments remained wholly unsatisfied. There was a demurrer to this plea, which was overruled; and final judgment was rendered against the petitioner.

This judgment is erroneous. The plea was no bar to the petition. The widow is entitled to dower in the land whereof hfer husband was seised during coverture. R. S. 1843, p. 428. The judgment-liens, as they did not affect the seisin of the husband, did not destroy the right of the widow to dower. It is true that, as the liens existed at the time of the marriage, the widow must take her dower subject to them. *175The judgment-creditors by enforcing their liens may dispossess her; but her right is good against every other, person. *Sanford*v. *M'Lean,*3 Paige, 117. The administrator of the husband has nothing to do with the matter. Should he procure an order of sale, he could only sell the land subject both to the judgment-liens and the right of dower. R. S. 1843, p. 429. The application of the widow for the assignment of dower does not at all interfere with the legal discharge of the duties of the administrator. His course should be the same as if no application had been made.

*J. A. Wright*and *S. F.*Maxwell, for the plaintiff.

*W. P. Bryant*and *A. L. Roache,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS PORTER.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, November 3, 2010, at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Commission hearing room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# STATUS:

                        Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The open parts of the meeting will be audiocast. The audiocast can be accessed via the Commission's website at                         *http://www.prc.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda for the Commission's November meeting includes the nine items identified below.

# PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

1. Review of postal-related congressional activity.

2. Report on international activities.

3. Review of active cases.

                        4. Report on recent activities of the Joint Periodicals Task Force and status                               ( print page 65675)                            of the report to the Congress pursuant to Section 708 of the PAEA.                    

5. Report on the status of the Annual Report.

6. Report on vacancies and positions recently filled.

# PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:

7. Discussion of pending litigation.

8. Discussion of confidential personnel issues.

9. Discussion of contracts involving confidential commercial information.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001, at                         *stephen.sharfman@prc.gov*                         or 202-789-6820 (for agenda-related inquiries) and Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary, at 202-789-6800 (for inquiries related to meeting location, access for handicapped or disabled persons, the audiocast, or other similar matters).                    

*Dated:*                         October 22, 2010.                    

By the Commission.

Shoshana M. Grove,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-27231 Filed 10-22-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO 

COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

JANICE L. SIKES, AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE 

FOR THE ESTATE OF JIMMIE 

WAYNE SIKES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3183

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 9, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Meir Feder and Charles R. A. Morse of Jones Day, New York, New York, Robert 

B. Parrish, David C. Reeves, and Jeffrey A. Yarbrough of Moseley, Prichard, 

Parrish of Knight & Jones, Jacksonville. Stephanie E. Parker, John F. Yarber, and 

John M. Walker of Jones Day, Atlanta. Kevin D. Boyce, and Edward Carter of 

Jones Day, Cleveland, Ohio, Gregory G. Katsas of Jones Day, Washington, DC.,

for Appellant.

John S. Kalil, Jacksonville, and John S. Mills and Courtney Brewer of The Mills 

Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company appeals the final judgment for plaintiff 

Janice L. Sikes, the personal representative of the estate of Jimmie Wayne Sikes. 

We affirm on all issues. But following R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Hiott,

129 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we certify conflict with the Fourth District’s 

decision in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Hess, 95 So. 3d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), 

rev. denied, 117 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2013), on the issue of whether the trial court 

reversibly erred by denying Reynolds’ requested jury instruction on the statute of 

repose, section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR. 

2
1 min read

# Laser Communications Relay Demonstration Lifts Off!

### NASA

Dec 07, 2021

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA’s Laser Communications Relay Demonstration, or LCRD, launched aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket on the Department of Defense’s Space Test Program 3 mission from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2021, from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

LCRD will showcase the unique capabilities of optical communications. The mission’s Space Test Program Satellite-6 spacecraft also hosts the NASA-U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Ultraviolet Spectro-Coronagraph (UVSC) Pathfinder. 

*Image Credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky*
# Columbia Data Recorder

Columbia data recorder

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/oex3/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- NASA History
Image CreditCAIB Photo no photographer listed 2003Size640x480pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 25, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michele Ostovar								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

 

FRANK PARKER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UTAH OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN

AD LITEM; BRENT NEWTON, GAL;

DAVID L. JOHNSON, GAL,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-4235

(D.C. No. 2:09-CV-00706-CW)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, O’BRIEN, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Mr. Parker is appealing from the district court’s judgment in favor of the

defendants, entered on October 28, 2009. The court orders that this appeal be

dismissed as untimely. 

Mr. Parker’s notice of appeal was due within 30 days of the entry of the

district court’s judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 2107

(a) (notice of appeal due within 30 days). It was not filed until December 22,

2009 - outside the 30 day period. No motion for an extension of time was filed in

the district court and this court cannot extend the time for filing a notice of

Appellate Case: 09-4235 Document: 01018345256 Date Filed: 01/08/2010 Page: 1
2

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4 (a)(5) and Alva v. Teen Help, 469 F.3d 946, 950

(10 Cir. 2006) (court of appeals lacks authority to find excusable neglect and th

extend the time for filing notice of appeal; only the district court may do so). 

Because the notice of appeal was untimely, this court lacks jurisdiction to

consider this appeal. Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-4235 Document: 01018345256 Date Filed: 01/08/2010 Page: 2
# Lifecycle of Energy

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators, Students

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8, Grades 9-12

## Subject

Physical Science, Flight and Aeronautics

## Type

Lesson Plans / Activities

In the Lifecycle of Energy activity, students will understand and create a two-tiered energy cycle to better understand how energy sources rely on each other. Students will find ways to lower emissions for more sustainable aviation solutions.

#### Lifecycle of Energy (5-8)

#### Lifecycle of Energy (9-12)
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-92495, 333-92497, 333-92499, 333-75610, and333-81410 of Huttig Building Products, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 13, 2004 (March** 14, 2005 as to Note 13), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huttig Building Products, Inc. for the year ended December31, 2004. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE& TOUCHE, LLP 

 

St. Louis, Missouri

March 14, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES R. TURNER, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 24 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of July , 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file the

already

- prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 5 days.
# ORIGINAL , IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24-0134

IN THE MATTER OF: C.H., ORDER A Youth in Need ofCare.

Appellant C.H., birthmother of the youth at issue, appeals the February 5, 2024 Findings ofFact, Conclusions ofLaw, and Order ofthe Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, that terminated her parental rights to C.H. in that court's Cause No. DN 18-292. The State has filed a Notice ofConcession. Although it maintains it does not agree with all the arguments the birthmother advanced in her Opening Brief, it concedes the District Court erred in terminating parental rights without the required testimony from a qualified Indian Child Welfare Act expert witness (ICWA QEW) as was required for C.H.'s case. The State asks this Court to reverse the February 5, 2024 order terminating the birthmother's parental rights and remand this case to the District Court for further proceedings. Having considered the Appellant's Opening Brief and the State's Notice of Concession, and good cause appearing, IT ISHEREBY ORDEREDthattheFebruary 5,2024 Findings ofFact,Conclusions ofLaw, and Order isREVERSED. This matter isremanded totheDistrict Court for further proceedings. DATED this day ofAugust, 2024.

ChiefJustice 08/06/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0134

# ELED AUG - 6 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of diAonterel

2 

# (al

Justices
# Saturn Apollo Program

The Apollo 11 mission, the first manned lunar mission, launched from the Kennedy Space Center, Florida via a Saturn V launch vehicle on July 16, 1969 and safely returned to Earth on July 24, 1969. The Saturn V vehicle was developed by the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) under the direction of Dr. Wernher von Braun. Aboard were Neil A. Armstrong, commander; Michael Collins, Command Module (CM) pilot; and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr., Lunar Module (LM) pilot. The CM, piloted by Michael Collins remained in a parking orbit around the Moon while the LM, named “Eagle’’, carrying astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, landed on the Moon. Armstrong was the first human to ever stand on the lunar surface, followed by Edwin (Buzz) Aldrin.  During 21⁄2 hours of surface exploration, the crew collected 47 pounds of lunar surface material for analysis back on Earth. The recovery operation took place in the Pacific Ocean where Navy para-rescue men recovered the capsule housing the 3-man Apollo 11 crew. The crew was taken to safety aboard the USS Hornet, where they were quartered in a mobile quarantine facility. Shown here is the Apollo 11 crew inside the quarantine facility as prayer is offered by Lt. Commander John Pirrto, USS Hornet Chaplain accompanied by U.S. President Richard Nixon (front right). With the success of Apollo 11, the national objective to land men on the Moon and return them safely to Earth had been accomplished. 

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-6901203/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 24, 1969ProducerMSFCSize1920x1390pxPIA Number6901203The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 29, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# KSC-98pc689

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER,  Fla. -- The last mission of the Shuttle-Mir program begins as the Space Shuttle Discovery lifts off from Launch Pad 39A at 6:06:24 p.m. EDT June 2. On board Discovery are Mission Commander Charles J. Precourt; Pilot Dominic L. Gorie; and Mission Specialists Wendy B. Lawrence, Franklin R. Chang-Diaz, Janet Lynn Kavandi and Valery Victorovitch Ryumin. The nearly10-day mission will feature the ninth and final Shuttle docking with the Russian space station Mir, the first Mir docking for the Space Shuttle orbiter Discovery, the first on-orbit test of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), and the first flight of the new Space Shuttle super lightweight external tank.. Astronaut Andrew S. W. Thomas will be returning to Earth as a STS-91 crew member after living more than four months aboard Mir

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-98pc689/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 2, 1998ProducerKSCSize1800x2280pxPIA NumberKSC-98pc689The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 24, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1672

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, Florida. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2003

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, 

Florida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timucuan Ecological 

5 and Historic Preserve Boundary Revision Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY OF TIMUCUAN ECOLOGI7 CAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVE, FLORIDA. 

8 Section 201(a) of Public Law 100–249 (16 U.S.C. 

9 698n) is amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There 

11 is hereby’’ and inserting the following: 
2

•S 1672 IS 

1 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(2) MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARY.—

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

6 land described in paragraph (1), the Preserve 

7 shall include approximately 12.5 acres of land 

8 located in Nassau County, Florida, as generally 

9 depicted on the map entitled ‘Timucuan Eco10 logical and Historic Preserve American Beach 

11 Adjustment’, numbered 006/80012 and dated 

12 June 2003. 

13 ‘‘(B) DUTIES OF SECRETARY.—The Sec14 retary of the Interior shall—

15 ‘‘(i) revise the boundaries of the Pre16 serve so as to encompass the land de17 scribed in subparagraph (A); and 

18 ‘‘(ii) maintain the map described in 

19 subparagraph (A) on file and available for 

20 public inspection in the appropriate offices 

21 of the National Park Service.’’.

Æ
Document

    
                 Corporate Office
1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA  94597
Phone 925.948.3642
Fax 925.947.0914




						
	TO:	Sonny Pennington
	FROM:	George Yuhas
	DATE:	March 1, 2020
	RE:	Modification and Extension of February 27, 1998 Employment Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement, as amended June 2, 2003, April 10, 2006, July 1, 2008, March 30, 2012, March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2016, and March 1, 2019 (this "Amendment")


         


Dear Sonny:


Per recent discussions, this Amendment modifies and extends your February 27, 1998 Employment Agreement, as amended, most recently on March 1, 2018 (as amended, the "Employment Agreement") and your February 27, 1998 Non-Competition Agreement, (as amended, the “Non-Competition Agreement"), as follows:


1)During the period from March 1, 2020 through February 28, 2022 effective as of March 1, 2020 (the "Term"), you will continue in your role as "Director of Special Projects" for the Corporate Division of Central Garden & Pet Company (the "Company"); provided, however that the Company may terminate your employment upon ninety (90) days' written notice. In the event of such termination, you shall be entitled to twelve (12) months' severance payments. You may terminate the employment relationship upon ninety (90) days notice.


2)Effective as of March 1, 2020, your base salary will be $104,000 annually. You will be expected to work a maximum of 500 hours per year (including travel time and Board Meeting time and shall not be required to relocate or commute on a regular basis from Madison, GA).


3)The Non-Competition Agreement will terminate two years after the end of your employment with the Company.


4)This Amendment will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia.


5)Except as herein modified (or modified by the June 2, 2003 amendment, the April 10, 2006 amendment, the July 1, 2008 amendment, the March 30, 2012 amendment, the March 1, 2014 amendment, or the March 1, 2016 amendment or the March 1, 2018 amendment), the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement will remain in full force and effect.














IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first written above.








									
	/s/ GEORGE YUHAS		/s/ BROOKS M. PENNINGTON III
	George Yuhas		Brooks M. Pennington, III
	General Counsel		
	Central Garden & Pet
****

# Apollo Flight Journal

## Recent Updates and Additions

### 2017-02-10

### 2017-01-05

### 2014-09-15

### 2012-12-12

CSM training documents

### 2010-02-11

### 2009-03-20

### 2016-06-20

Lunar Orbit Rendezvous

----

**Journal Home Page**