alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26898]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,510]


JELD-WEN Millwork Distribution, Wilkesboro, NC; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 3, 2010, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
Notice of negative determination was issued on January 11, 2010 and 
published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7039). 
The workers produce wooden exterior door frames.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that there was no increase in imports of like or 
directly competitive articles by either the subject firm or its 
customers, and no shift to/acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of production of like or directly competitive articles. 
The investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not produce a 
component part that was used by a firm that employed workers eligible 
to apply for TAA and used the component parts in the production of the 
article that was the basis for the certification.
    The workers, in the request for reconsideration, state that subject 
firm's competitors and customer have increased imports of like or 
directly competitive articles from China. The workers also allege that 
the articles produced at the subject firm include door component parts 
(``door jambs, door T-AST, door mull posts'') and window component 
parts (``replacement window grills''), and that those articles are 
being imported from China.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26898 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2020

s1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2020

161498

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161498

COA: 345696

Wayne CC: 18

- 003178

- FC

RICARDO LEWIS WITHERSPOON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C23  Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00187-CV

Michael McCann, TDCJ #879919

v.

Megan Thompson, et al.

On Appeal from the

343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-18-1193-CV-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed as appellant filed an 

affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 16, 2021
# Outside the Classroom – NASA

Official National Aeronautics and Space Administration Website

- Slow Your Student’s ‘Summer Slide’ and Beat Boredom With NASA STEM The school year has come to an end, and those long summer days are stretching ahead like an open runway. Parents and educators often worry about the “summer slide,” the concept that students may lose academic ground while out of school. But summer doesn’t mean students’ imaginations have to stay grounded! Are you hoping to [&#8230;]
- FY2024 TEAM II NOFO Announcement Next Gen STEM’s Teams Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions (TEAM II) program is pleased to announce an upcoming FY2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) that will expand the current program from a two-tier to a three-tier system by adding a mid-level funding tier. The NOFO is expected to be released in the third quarter [&#8230;]
- NASA Awards Promote Science, Technology, Engineering, Math Nationwide NASA is awarding approximately $3.7 million to 17 museums, science centers, and other informal education institutions as part of an initiative to ignite STEM excitement. The money will go toward projects that inspire students and their learning support systems to take an active role in the wonder of science, technology, engineering, and math. &#160; “We’re [&#8230;]
# STS-51A launch

51A-90032 (8 Nov 1984) --- Space Shuttle Discovery blasts off from launch pad 39A to begin its second space trip. Five crewmembers inside head toward a scheduled eight-day stay in earth orbit, during which two satellites will be deployed and two more will be retrieved for eventual re-deployment. Onboard Discovery are astronauts Frederick H. (Rick) Hauck, David M. Walker, Joseph P. Allen, Dale A. Gardner and Anna L. Fisher.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/51a-90032/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize4710x4488pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 28, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Sandra L. Johnson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000640

22-FEB-2018

10:58 AM
2 min read

# NASA Leadership to Visit Mexico, Strengthen Cooperation

### Tiernan P. Doyle

Apr 16, 2024

MEDIA ADVISORYM24-056

NASA Headquarters

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

***Editor’s note: This advisory was updated Tuesday, April 16, 2024, to clarify that a meeting with Mexico’s president is pending confirmation.***

*Lee esta nota de prensa en español aquí.*

Continuing their significant engagement with key government officials around the world to deepen ties and strengthen space collaboration, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson and Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy will visit Mexico City on Monday, April 22 and Tuesday, April 23. 

Nelson and Melroy will meet with senior Mexican government officials, including President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, pending confirmation, and Mexican Space Agency (AEM) leaders, to strengthen bilateral cooperation across a broad range of innovation and research areas, such as Earth science and exploration. Together, the two nations are working to achieve mutual goals of addressing climate change. 

NASA and AEM also are collaborating on nanosatellite technology demonstrators that will contribute to the future of space exploration. Mexico is a signatory of the Artemis Accords, a practical set of principles to guide space exploration cooperation among nations for the safe, peaceful, and prosperous use of space.

The visit to Mexico coincides with Earth Day on April 22. NASA is engaged in a wide range of activities with Mexican counterparts in Earth science. The administrator and deputy administrator will discuss opportunities for broadening this area of collaboration, including using NASA missions to study air quality and improving water resources management.

Nelson and Melroy also will meet with students in Mexico to discuss science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and their role as members of the Artemis Generation. 

For more information about NASA’s international partnerships, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/oiir/

-end-

Faith McKieHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1600faith.d.mckie@nasa.gov  

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

NASA Headquarters

## Related Terms

                - Opportunities For International Participants to Get Involved
                - Office of International and Interagency Relations (OIIR)
                - Science & Research
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 30, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 003 52

- CV

Stetson Roane, Appellant

v.

Halcy Martin Dean, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE LLY, A ND S MITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN;

DISSENTING OPINION B Y JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l cou rt on May 3, 2019. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the court’s interlocutory order

. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s interlocutory order

denying Stetson Roane’s plea to the jurisdiction and renders judgment granting his plea and

dismissing Halcy Martin Dean’s claim. The appell ee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court b elow.
#### Williams and Another *v.*Dyer and Another.

*Tuesday, June*4

The payee’s possession of a note is *prima facie*evidence that it is his, though there be on the note his special indorsement of it to a third person.

ERROR to the *Marshall*Circuit Court.

*J. A. Liston,*for the plaintiffs.

*H. Cooper,*for the defendants.,

Blackford, *J.*

Edwin *Dyer*and *David B.*Freeman, trading under the firm of *Dyer fy Freeman,*brought an action of debt against the makers of a promissory note. Plea, nil debent. The note was payable to the plaintiffs, and had on it the following indorsements, viz., “ Pay to *Edwin Dyer*the within note. Value received. *Dec.*17, *1835.*—D. *B. Freeman.” “Jan.*7, 1836. *Edwin Dyer.”*An objection was made to the note as evidence, in consequence of the indorsements; but the objection was overruled. Judgment for the plaintiffs.

The only question in the cause is, whether the indorsements on the note rendered it inadmissible evidence, in an action by the plaintiffs ? *,*

We shall not examine into the validity of the indorsements; for, admitting them to be valid, the question we have stated must be answered in the negative.

The possession of the nqte by the payees is *prima facie*evidence that they are the owners of it, although there may be on the note a special indorsement of it by them to a third person. *Dugan*v. *The United States,*3 Wheat. 172.—*Picquet*v. *Curtis,*1 Sumner, *478.*—Hanna v. *Pegg,*1 Blackf. *181.*—Harris *et al.*v. *Smith,*4 id. *550.*—Dodd v. *Noble, ante,*p. 30.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed, with 6 *per cent.*damages and costs.
Exhibit 32.3  

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

 (i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 3, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: December 11, 2007 |
|--------------------------|

 

| /s/ Douglas G. Markham  |
|-------------------------|
| Douglas G. Markham      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

MICHAEL DOYLE,

Petitioner.

No. 09-1426

(D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01358-WYD-KMT)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, TYMKOVICH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Michael Doyle has requested a writ of mandamus ordering the district court

to decide his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas application. This court invited the

district court to respond to Mr. Doyle’s petition. On January 6, 2010, the district

court responded, stating that Mr. Doyle’s habeas application had been denied and

the district-court case dismissed. Accordingly, Mr. Doyle has received the relief

he seeks, and this proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1426 Document: 01018344242 Date Filed: 01/07/2010 Page: 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.140
                                   DEMAND NOTE

$250,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                              May 6, 1999

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Fifty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($250,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest of 8.5%
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.


                                         Wilshire Technologies, Inc.


                                         By: /s/ Kathleen E. Terry
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Name: Kathleen E. Terry
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Johnny Wayne Robertson

, * From the 441st District Court

of Midland County

Trial Court No. CR45429.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 350

- CR * November 27, 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C. J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

( Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-72,949]

                    By application dated September 14, 2010, workers requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Department's Notice of negative determination was issued on August 5, 2010 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 23, 2010 (75 FR 51849). The workers are engaged in activity related to the supply of engineering services.                

The negative determination was based on the findings that the subject firm did not increase imports services supplied by the worker's firm and that there has not been a shift to a foreign country in the supply of services by the subject firm. The investigation also revealed that the subject firm does not supply a service that was directly used in the production of an article by a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA.

The request for reconsideration alleges that increased imports of articles (disk drives) that were produced directly using the services supplied by the subject workers (engineering) contributed importantly to separations at the subject firm.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-26901 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 915 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, Mrs. CAROLYN

B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. MOORE, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Mr. TAKANO, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. POCAN, and Mr. 

LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at 

Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Pro5 tecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 915 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF THE PROTECTING TENANTS AT 

2 FORECLOSURE ACT OF 2009. 

3 (a) REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.—Section 704 of 

4 the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (12 

5 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437f 

6 note) is repealed. 

7 (b) RESTORATION.—Sections 701 through 703 of 

8 such Act, the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

9 such sections, and any regulations promulgated pursuant 

10 to such sections, as were in effect on December 31, 2014, 

11 are restored and revived as if the sunset provision in sec12 tion 704 had not taken effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS