alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-73,874]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 29, 2010, applicable to workers of The Wise Company, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 15, 2010 (75 FR 63510).                

At the request of a State workforce official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The Wise Company, Inc. workers are engaged in activities related to the production of boat seats.

New information shows that the Department did not correctly state the subject firm location on the certification decision. The correct location of the subject firm should read 3750 Industrial Drive, Carlyle, Illinois.

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to correct the location of the subject firm to read 3750 Industrial Drive, Carlyle, Illinois.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,874 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of The Wise Company, (B & M Seating), 3750 Industrial Drive, Carlyle, Illinois, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 6, 2009, through September 29, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of October 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-27390 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Richardville, Administrator, *v.*Cummins.—In error.

*Saturday, November 24,*

THE legal interest in a judgment is not assignable, either by the statute or at common law.
Total 

Number of 

Employees 

requiring 

PIV cards

Total Number 

of Employees 

requiring a 

NACI (or at 

least 

equivalent) 

that have not 

previously 

undergone a 

background 

check

Total 

Number of 

PIV cards 

Issued to 

Employees

Total 

Number of 

Contractors 

requiring PIV 

cards

Total Number 

of Contractors 

requiring 

NACIs (or at 

least 

equivalent) that 

have not 

previously 

undergone a 

background 

check

Total 

Number of 

PIV cards 

Issued to 

Contractors

Total 

Number of 

other 

individuals 

(e.g. visiting

scientists) 

requiring 

PIV cards

Total Number of 

other individuals 

(e.g. visiting 

scientists) 

requiring NACIs 

(or at least 

equivalent) that 

have not 

previously 

undergone a 

background check

Total Number 

of PIV cards 

Issued to 

individuals 

other than 

employees or 

contractors

18,801 0 14 54,155 15,363 150 2,870 2,870 0
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 302

Expressing support for designation of May 2017 as ``Health and Fitness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2017

 Mr. Veasey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for designation of May 2017 as ``Health and Fitness 
                                Month''.

Whereas \2/3\ of adults and nearly 1 in 3 children are overweight or obese in 
        the United States;
Whereas unhealthy eating habits and lack of physical activity have contributed 
        to the obesity epidemic in the United States;
Whereas the prevalence of obesity in the United States more than doubled from 15 
        percent to 34 percent among adults and more than tripled from 5 percent 
        to 17 percent among children and adolescents from 1980 to 2008;
Whereas an obese teenager is 70 percent more likely to become an obese adult;
Whereas obesity is more common among non-Hispanic Black teenagers (29 percent) 
        than Hispanic teenagers (17.5 percent) or non-Hispanic White teenagers 
        (14.5 percent);
Whereas 70 percent of American Indian/Alaskan Native adults are overweight or 
        obese;
Whereas studies indicate that overweight youth may never achieve a healthy 
        weight;
Whereas a poor diet is associated with major health risks that can cause illness 
        and even death;
Whereas in addition to healthy eating, people in the United States can 
        experience positive health benefits and be on the path for a better 
        future by incorporating physical activity into daily life, including 30 
        minutes for adults and 60 minutes for children;
Whereas physical activity can help prevent chronic diseases such as heart 
        disease, cancer, and stroke, control weight, reduce fat, condition the 
        heart and lungs, improve sleep, decrease the potential of becoming 
        depressed, increase energy and self-esteem, relieve stress, and increase 
        the chances of living longer; and
Whereas May 2017 would be an appropriate month to designate as ``Health and 
        Fitness Month'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Health and Fitness 
        Month''; and
            (2) supports efforts to educate the people of the United 
        States on the importance of a healthy and nutritious lifestyle.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT W. PETTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR97-107-DKC; CA-03-1311-8-DKC) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert W. Petty, Appellant Pro Se. Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert W. Petty seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying various pending motions and directing him to clarify the claims on which he wished to proceed in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Petty seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Jerson Ramos CALUYA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 02-70215.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 5, 2003.*

Filed April 3, 2003.

Amended Sept. 8, 2003.

Samuel W. Asbury, Esq., Gresham, OR, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Emily A. Radford, Attorney, Allen W. Hausman, Attorney, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before D.W. NELSON, WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

AMENDED MEMORANDUM **

Jerson Ramos Caluya petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s decision upholding the denial of his untimely motion to reopen his case. The BIA determined that, prior to being ordered deported *in absentia,*Caluya received notice of the deportation hearing, and that he was not entitled to equitable tolling of the motion to reopen deadline. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a (repealed 1996) to review the BIA’s order, and we deny the petition.

We lack jurisdiction to review Caluya’s assertion that the IJ and BIA erred under *In re M-S-,*22 I. & N. Dec. 349 (B.I.A. 1998) (en banc), in applying the wrong standard in evaluating his motion, because he raises this argument for the first time before us. *See Cortez-Acosta v. INS,*234 F.3d 476, 480 (9th Cir.2000). We simply note that Caluya’s motion was untimely by either standard, as it was filed nearly seven years after the *in absentia*deportation order was entered. 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(4)(ni)(A)(l) (motions to rescind must be filed within “180 days [from] the date of the *[in absentia*deportation] order” if the alien wishes to demonstrate that his “failure to appear was because of exceptional circumstances”); *id.*§ 3.23(b)(1) (motions to reopen “must be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of ... deportation”). Caluya has failed to allege fraud or misconduct sufficient to entitle him to equitable tolling of either of these fifing deadlines. *Fajardo v. INS,*300 F.3d 1018, 1020-21 (9th Cir.2002).

Caluya’s assertion that his motion was nevertheless timely under 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2) because he never received actual notice of his deportation hearing, even though the Immigration Court sent him notice by certified mail, is *689waived because he raised it for the first time in his supplemental brief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996).

DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2021

s0120 

# Order

Clerk January 27, 2021

161605

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161605 COA: 342999 Saginaw CC: 17

- 043735

- FC GERALD LYNN ALLEN, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Part III.B.2 of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration of the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, based on trial counsel’s failure to call witnesses, under the correct standard. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that “[b]ecause Allen was not deprived of a substantial defense, trial counsel’s dec ision not to call Dr. Hicks and Dr. Defriez as witnesses at trial did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness and counsel was not ineffective in this respect.” People v Allen

, ___ Mich App ___ (2020), slip op p 10. The defendant was not re quired to show, in order to obtain relief for ineffective assistance of counsel, that trial counsel’s failure to call witnesses deprived him of a substantial defense. Rather, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel premised on the failure to call wit nesses is analyzed under the same standard as all other claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, i.e., a defendant must show that “(1) counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) but for counsel’s deficient performa nce, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome

would have been different.” People v Trakhtenberg , 493 Mich 38, 51 (2012); see also Strickland v Washington , 466 US 668 (1984). On remand, the Court of Appeals shall

resolve the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under this standard. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Herschel J. Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Herschel J. Walker
-------------------------
Herschel J. Walker
Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7338

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICKY CAMPBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (5:05-cr-00013)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles T. Miller, United States

Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Campbell appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). As

noted by the district court, civil procedural rules are

inapplicable for Campbell’s criminal proceeding. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Campbell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

v. Campbell, No. 5:05-cr-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 12.2​



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gil Efron, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment Number 1 to annual report on Form 20-F of Kitov Pharma Ltd.;                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|Date: April 3, 2019     | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Gil Efron           | 
|Gil Efron               | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0078 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. MICHEL SCOTT DULANEY

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Stephanie A. Morrow is granted an extension of time to and including July 11 , 202 3, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 23 2023

05/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0078
NASA Advisory Council Ad Hoc Task Force on

Science, Technology, Engineering

and Mathematics (STEM) Education

AGENDA

Nov. 19, 2015

1:00 pm-3:30 pm

NASA Headquarters 5J42

Webex and Call In Information Below

1:00 Open Meeting B. Girten

1:10 Opening Remarks by Chair J. Stofan

1:20 Office of Inspector General Report on NASA Education J. Stofan

 

1:25 Review and Discuss Topics Identified for Findings and Recommendations Members

2:15 Break

2:30 Determine Priorities of Findings and Recommendations Members

2:50 Formulate Top Findings and Recommendations Members

3:30 Close Meeting B. Girten

844–467–6272 or toll access number 720–259–6462, and then the participant passcode: 329152 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx the link is https://nasa.webex.com/, the meeting number is 993 181 607 and the password is Educate1!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILE AS PART OF SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,229
<INVENTORY>                                     83,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,039
<PP&E>                                         149,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           857
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,100
<SALES>                                        317,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,803
<CGS>                                          212,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (808)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,162
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>