alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLWY-957400-11-L14200000-BJ0000-TRST]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Nebraska.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the plats of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was executed at the request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and is necessary for the management of these lands. The lands surveyed are:

The plats and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the Treaty Boundary of March 8, 1865, through Range 7 East, portions of the exterior boundaries, the subdivisional lines and the subdivision of certain sections, and the survey of the subdivision of certain sections, Township 26 North, Range 7 East, Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska, Group No. 166, was accepted September 29, 2010.

Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

Dated: October 21, 2010.

John P. Lee,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-27341 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### Buford *v.*Ganson.—In error.

Thursday, *June*17.

THE surety in a bond For the;prison limits cannot surrender his principal, who had escaped', in discharge of the condition of the bond.

There were in this case- several issues on pleas in bar of the whole cause of action. One of the is'sues .being oti *nul tiel record*was for' the Court, the others were for a jury to try. Held, that the plaintiff could not have final judgment until the issüe on *nul tiel*record, as well as the others, had-been found in his favour. *Barker v. M'Clure,*2 Blackf. 14.
pfnx-ex108_102.htm



Exhibit 10.8

 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN OMITTED HAS BEEN NOTED IN THIS DOCUMENT WITH A PLACEHOLDER IDENTIFIED BY THE MARK “[***]”.

 

 



 

April 27, 2020

 

Alvogen Malta (Out-Licensing) Ltd. 

Malta Life Sciences Park,

Sir Temi Zammit Buildings, Level 4,

Building 1, San Gwann Industrial Estate,

SGN 3000, Malta

Attention: Legal

 

VIA EMAIL

Re:  Development and License Agreement dated February 25, 2019 (as previously amended, the “ROW Agreement”) between Pfenex Inc. (“Pfenex”) and Alvogen Malta (Out-Licensing) Ltd. (“Alvogen”)

Dear Edin,

This letter, pursuant to Section 12.11 of the ROW Agreement, confirms Pfenex’s agreement to waive Alvogen’s obligation to pay Pfenex its share of the Sublicense Consideration pursuant to Section 4.1(a) of the ROW Agreement with respect to the first $[***] Sublicense Consideration received from [***] or any of its Affiliates ([***] and its Affiliates jointly referred to as [***]) , if Alvogen enters into an arrangement pursuant to which it grants to [***] a sublicense under the Product License in the Territory (“[***] Agreement”). The first $[***] Sublicense Consideration received by Alvogen from [***] regarding the [***] Agreement shall be referred to as the “Waived Sublicense Consideration”.  For the sake of clarity, Alvogen shall retain the Waived Sublicense Consideration completely and Pfenex shall not receive any part of the Waived Sublicense Consideration.

For clarity, Alvogen shall nonetheless report any Sublicense Consideration received from [***] including the Waived Sublicense Consideration in accordance with Section 4.2 of the ROW Agreement, but calculation and payment of Pfenex’s share of the Sublicense Consideration from the [***] Agreement shall exclude the Waived Sublicense Consideration which Waived Sublicense Consideration shall be kept completely by Alvogen. This waiver shall be irrevocable and shall take effect from the date of this letter. Capitalized terms in this letter not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given thereto in the ROW Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in this letter, the ROW Agreement remains in effect.

Best regards,

Pfenex Inc.

 


		
	
/s/ Eef Schimmelpennink
	
Acknowledged and Agreed

/s/ Mark De Cesare

	
Eef Schimmelpennink
	
Mark De Cesare

	
Chief Executive Officer
	
Director

	
Pfenex Inc. 
	
Alvogen Malta (Out-Licensing) Ltd. 




 

Copy only by email:  

David C. Lee

Ian Edvalson
# The Expedition 1 crew poses aboard a Black Sea freighter

97-10684 (October 3, 1997) --- The first crew of the International Space Station pose aboard a Black Sea freighter before beginning water survival training recently. From left, they are Soyuz Commander and Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gidzenko; International Space Station Commander Bill Shepherd; and Flight Engineer and Russian Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev. In the background is a mockup of the Russian Soyuz spacecraft descent module used in training. The crew is scheduled to be launched to the new station aboard a Soyuz spacecraft in January 1999. 

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/97-10684-9474354316-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize2200x2625pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of EMPS Corporation, on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Mirgali Kunayev, Chief Executive Officer and Laird Garrard, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2003                /s/ Mirgali Kunayev
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Mirgali Kunayev, Principal Executive Officer



Date:    April 15, 2003             /s/ Laird Garrard
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Laird Garrard, Principal Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Daiber, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas A. DaiberThomas A. Daiber
Chief Executive Officer
 May 12, 2005
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








The
      Board
      of Directors


NexCen
      Brands, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-91369, 333-52220, 333-128062, 333-52222, 333-139078) on Form S-8 and (No.
      333-137365) on From S-3 of NexCen Brands, Inc. (formerly Aether Holdings, Inc.)
      of our report dated March 16, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance
      sheets of NexCen Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
      2005,
      and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
      stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
      period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated March 16, 2007 with respect
      to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting as December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear
      in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on From 10-K of NexCen Brands,
      Inc.







/s/
      KPMG
      LLP





Baltimore,
      Maryland


March
      16,
      2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2018

d0920 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2018

154684

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154684

COA: 325806

Saginaw CC: 14

- 039758

- FJ

KAREEM AMID SWILLEY, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the September

13, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in ab eyance pending the decision in

People v Chatman (Docket No. 155184). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having

been denied in Chatman on March 9, 2018, 501 Mich 1011 (2018), the application is

again considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral ar gument on the application.

MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this

order addressing whether it is reasonably likely that the trial court’s questioning of

witnesses improperly influenced the jur y by creating the appearance of advocacy or

partiality against a party. See People v Stevens , 498 Mich 162 (2015). In addition to the

brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2).

In the brief, citations to th e record must provide the appendix page numbers as required

by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of

being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an

appendix, or in the alt ernative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant.

A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the

appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application

papers.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 05/75-0257]


Cardinal Growth, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 
of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Cardinal Growth, L.P., 311 South Wacker 
Driver, Suite 5500, Chicago, IL 60606, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Cardinal Growth, L.P. provided financing to GreenRock Environmental 
Management, Inc., 1400 West Carroll Avenue, Chicago, IL 60607. The 
financing was used to purchase office and computer related equipment 
for the small business.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because the CEO of GreenRock Environmental 
Management, Inc. assumed financial responsibilities at Cardinal Growth, 
L.P. within 6 months of the financing. According to the definition of 
Associate in Sec.  107.50, Section 10 if an Associate relationship 
exists at any time within 6 months before or after the date of a 
Financing, then the Associate relationship is considered to exist on 
the date of the Financing.
    Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an 
Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any 
interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within 
fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate 
Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: January 6, 2010.
Sean Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010-2717 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited
33 Chester Street
London, SWIX 7DX



March 13, 1997

Fotoball USA, Inc.
Mr. David Forster
3738 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123


Re: US$3,000,000.00 Facility Agreement
          (dated December 20, 1995)

Dear Mr. Forster:

We are writing to give notice to Fotoball USA, Inc. (the "Client") of the
following:

	The Maturity Date will be extended until December 10, 2001.

This letter is and shall be part of the "Agreement" as defined in the Term
Sheet forming part of the above Facility Agreement.  Kindly acknowledge
receipt of this letter by signing and returning the enclosed copy.

Yours faithfully,

For and on behalf of
Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited


/s/ Alan Stern
-------------------


I/We acknowledge receipt of your letter.

Signed, Client:  /s/ David G. Forster                  Date: 3/27/97
                 --------------------                        -------
                 FOTOBALL USA, INC.


	Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited is regulated by The Securities
        and Futures Authority Limited
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Huntsman International Holdings LLC (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                         |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                                         |  | 
|/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial
OfficerNovember 23, 2004 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS AYRES.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1648 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1648

   To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 
         Rancheria of California is deemed to be held in trust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2003

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 
         Rancheria of California is deemed to be held in trust.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act (114 Stat. 2919) 
is amended by striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People v. Calvin Hall.

*Criminal law*— Larceny—Admissions *of counsel*— Charge *to Jury.*

A respondent cannot be convicted of larceny upon the admissions of his counsel, and it is error in such a case to instruct the jury either that the respondent took the property with felonious intent, or that the jury must find him guilty of the offense charged.

*133Error to Tuscola. (Beach, J.)

Submitted on briefs May 6, 1891.

Decided May 15, 1891.

Information for larceny.

Conviction reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*L. H. Corcoran,*for respondent.

*A. A. Ellis,*Attorney General, for the people.

McGrath, J.

Defendant was tried and convicted of stealing a given number of sheep, of the value of $27. His plea was not guilty. The owner testified to the loss of the sheep, and a butcher and one of the men in his employ testified to the purchase of the same number and description of sheep from defendant, and to the presence of a metal ear-tab, which was identified by the owner. No other testimony was offered as to the taking, and defendant offered no testimony. The court instructed the jury as to the taking as follows:

> “It is admitted that he is guilty of the theft of those animals; that is, so far as the question of theft is concerned, that is disposed of, practically, because the counsel admits that there is no defense to be made upon that question. Mr. Hall actually took those sheep with felonious and larcenous intent. * * * The only remaining question is the value of this property. In returning your verdict of guilty, you will return what you assess the value of this property to be."

Error is assigned upon this instruction.

A conviction in a criminal case, involving the question of intent, cannot be predicated upon the-admissions of counsel, and .it is error in such case to instruct the jury either that the defendant took the property with felonious intent, or that the jury must find the defendant guilty of the offense charged. In this case the Court did both. The rule laid down in *People v. Neumann,*85 Mich. 98, is limited to cases “where there is no question of *134intent.” It is unnecessary to notice the other assignments of error.

The conviction must be set aside, and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
EXHIBIT 10.1

    

     

    

    AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    

    

    

    

    This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  (“Amendment”) is entered into as of March 10, 2020 among Cadiz Inc., a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Timothy J. Shaheen (“Shaheen”). 
      The parties to this Amendment are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as the "Parties".

    

    

    

    

    RECITALS:

    

    

    WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of June 13, 2014 (the "Agreement"); and

    

    

    WHEREAS, the Agreement is terminable by either of the Parties without Cause; and

    

    

    WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide additional compensation to Shaheen for his ongoing service as the Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company both prior to and beyond the effective date of this Agreement;

    

    

    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the promises and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
      herein contained, the Parties hereby agree as follows.  Defined terms used herein shall, if not otherwise defined in this Amendment, have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.

    

    

    1. Payments following Termination.  Section 6(b)(vi) is hereby added  to the Agreement to
        read in its entirety as follows:

    

    

    "vi. In the event that
      Shaheen ceases to serve as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company at any time following the effective date of this Amendment for any reason other than as a result of termination by the Company for Cause pursuant to Section (a)(iii) above, the
      Company shall pay to Shaheen a bonus of $300,000 (the “Service Continuation Bonus”).  The Service Continuation Bonus shall be payable to Shaheen in cash not later than ten business days following the date that Shaheen ceases to serve as the Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, subject to such withholdings and deductions as may be required in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company."

    

    

    2. Existing Agreement.  Except as otherwise amended or modified herein or hereby, the
        provisions of the Agreement (including, without limitation, the heretofore existing provisions regarding payments following termination set forth in Section 6(b) of the Agreement) shall remain in full force and effect.

    
      
        


    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their proper
      and duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.

    CADIZ INC.

    By:  /s/ Murray Hutchison

      

    Murray Hutchison, Chairman Compensation Committee

    SHAHEEN

    By:  /s/ Timothy J. Shaheen

      

         Timothy J. Shaheen