alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQUIMED, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,426
<PP&E>                                          20,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,378
<BONDS>                                         14,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,183
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,443
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (127)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        

</TABLE>
Order filed, October 18, 2016

.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 16

- 00807

- CV

____________ DONALD KILPATRICK, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS A SSIGNEE OF CAUSES OF ACTION OF JEREMY DICKS , Appellant

V.

NOBLE CAPITAL SERVIC ING, LLC, K AREEM HAJJAR, TRUSTE E , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 31821C



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 15, 2016. See Tex. R.
App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record
has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn, the official court reporter, to file the record in t his
appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
EquiMed, Inc.

                           EXHIBIT 11

      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

            (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                            Three months ended  Nine months ended
                              September 30,       September 30,  
                              1996      1997      1996      1997
Primary:

  Weighted average common
    shares outstanding       4,765     4,458      4,556    4,552
  Net effect of dilutive
    stock options and
    warrants-based on the
    treasury stock method
    using average market
    price                        2        --         18       --
  Weighted average common
    share and equivalents
    outstanding              4,767     4,458      4,574    4,552

  Net Income (Loss)        (21,673)    2,844    (18,581)   8,622

  Net Loss per share                     .64                1.89

  Pro forma net income     (21,348)             (17,604)

  Pro forma net income
    per share                (4.48)               (3.85)

Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average common
    shares outstanding       4,765     4,458      4,556    4,552

  Net effect of dilutive
    stock options and
    warrants-based on the
    treasury stock method
    using the June 30 price,
    if higher than average
    market price                 2        --         16       --
  Weighted average common
    share and equivalents
    outstanding              4,767     4,458      4,572    4,552

  Net Income (Loss)        (21,673)    2,844    (18,581)   8,622

  Net loss per share         (4.55)               (4.06)

  Pro forma net income     (21,348)             (17,604)

  Pro forma net income
    per share                (4.48)               (3.85)
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.02







Eighth Amendment
to the
Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-In-Control Policy 


THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT is made this 31st day of March, 2020, by Xcel Energy Inc. (the “Principal Sponsor”).


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Principal Sponsor maintains the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-In-Control Policy (the “Policy”), and


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Principal Sponsor (the “Board”) has reserved the right to make amendments to the Policy, and


WHEREAS, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the Principal Sponsor (the “Committee”) has reserved the right to appoint or remove Participants under the Policy, and


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Policy in certain respects to add a Participant to Schedule I to be effective March 31, 2020.   


NOW, THEREFORE, the Policy is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Schedule I - Participants:  Schedule I to the Policy is hereby amended to add Brian Van Abel to the Schedule as a Tier I Participant as follows:




	
				
	Name
	Tier
	Severance Multiple
	Change-in-Control Multiple

	Brian Van Abel
	1
	1
	3








		
	2.
	Savings Clause.  Except as hereinabove set forth, the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-In-Control Policy shall continue in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Xcel Energy Inc. has caused this instrument to be enacted by its duly authorized officer as of the date set forth to be effective March 31, 2020.  


XCEL ENERGY INC.             
By:__/s/ Darla Figoli__________
Its: Senior Vice President, CHRO
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50596 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jesus Sierra**

**- Rodriguez,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 1178

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Sierra

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sierra

- Rodriguez has not file d a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 19, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50596 Document: 00516100618 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2021No. 21

- 50596

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 21-50596 Document: 00516100618 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2021
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 In connection with the Annual Report of AetherSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, to the best of his knowledge and inthe capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David S.  Oros       |   | April 11, 2005 |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------|
| David S. Oros            |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/ David C.  Reymann    |   | April 11, 2005 |
| David C. Reymann         |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |
|                          |        |                |  |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AetherSystems, Inc. and will be retained by Aether Systems, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3008

___________

Darron Dean, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

John Ault, Warden; Scott Stevens, * Southern District of Iowa.

Counselor; Marty Rung, Unit Manager; *

Iowa Department of Corrections; Dave * [UNPUBLISHED]

DeGrange, Grievance Officer; Roger *

Larson, Treatment Director; Sheryl *

Lockwood, Assistant Deputy *

Director - Eastern Region, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 28, 2009

Filed: August 31, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Darron Dean appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal without

prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative
-2-

remedies. We reviewed the district court’s fact findings for clear error and its

conclusions of law de novo, and conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons

stated by the district court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (no action shall be brought with

respect to prison conditions until such administrative remedies as are available are

exhausted); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 626 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF ORGANIC, INC.
                             as at December 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                          Jurisdiction of Organization
--------------------------------------                        -----------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Organic Logistics, Inc.(1)                                    Delaware
Organic Media, Inc.(1)                                        Delaware

Organic Brasil Comunicacao Interativa Limitada(2)             Brazil
Organic.com Pte Ltd                                           Singapore
Organic Online Canada Inc.                                    Ontario, Canada
Organic Online Limited                                        England and Wales
</TABLE>


------------------------------
(1)  Each of these wholly owned subsidiaries was merged with and into Organic,
     Inc. in January 2001.
(2)  Through December 31, 2000, Organic, Inc. owned a 30% equity interest in
     this subsidiary.  In January 2001, Organic, Inc. acquired the remaining 30%
     equity interest in this subsidiary and consequently owns 100% of Organic
     Brasil Comunicacao Interativa Ltda.
# Crew-8 poses for a group photo

jsc2023e050368 (Aug. 10, 2023) --- Crew-8 poses for a group photo inside the Dragon capsule during their first week of training at SpaceX in Hawthorne, California. From left, are Mission Specialist Aleksandr Grebenkin from Roscosmos, and Pilot Michael Barratt, Commander Matthew Dominick, and Mission Specialist Jeanette Epps, all from NASA. Credit: SpaceX

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/jsc2023e050368-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 10, 2023Image CreditNASASize3463x2160pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 25, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1193

DAVID M. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CLAYTON C. CARTER, individually and as Associate Judge for the Circuit Court of Queen

Anne's County and the Second Judicial Circuit

for the State of Maryland; GEORGE B. RASIN,

JR., individually and as Associate Judge for

Kent County and Chief Judge of the Second

Judicial Circuit for the State of Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JOHN C. NORTH, II, individually and as associate Judge for the Circuit Court for Talbot

County, and the Second Judicial Circuit for

the State of Maryland; TALBOT COUNTY, MARYLAND, a/k/a The County Council of Talbot

County, a municipal body corporate and

politic; JAMES WISE, individually and as

Associate Judge for the Circuit Court for

Caroline County and the Second Judicial

Circuit for the State of Maryland; CAROLINE

COUNTY, MARYLAND, a/k/a The Board of County

Commissioners for Carolina County, a municipal

body corporate and politic; DONALDSON C. COLE,

JR., individually and as associate Judge for

the Circuit Court for Cecil County and the

Second Judicial Circuit for the State of Maryland; CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a/k/a Board of

County Commissioners of Cecil County, Maryland, a municipal body corporate and politic;

QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, a/k/a The Board of County
2

Commissioners for Queen Anne's County, Maryland, a municipal body corporate and politic;

JENNIFER BODINE; PHILIP C. FOSTER; WALLER S.

HAIRSTON; GAIL HANDLY; JERI BAKER; JOAN B.

TURNER; CHESAPEAKE PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-85-3088-K)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Ira Frederick, ECCLESTON

& WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders directing

a response to and granting defendants' motion for attorneys fees

and costs. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Carter, No. CA-85-

3088-K (D. Md. Oct. 30, 1995 & Dec. 28, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Sitemap

## March 31, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 03
- March 31, 2009

            - Hubble Finds Hidden Exoplanet in Archival Data
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NEWTON O. BEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-3286

(D.C. No. 2:94-CR-20075-KHV-JPO-1)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Appellant’s “Voluntary Motion to Dismiss

Criminal Appeal.” The motion is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. Rule 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-3286 Document: 01018473598 Date Filed: 08/09/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  BY:
    /s/ Terry E. MichaelsonTerry E. MichaelsonChief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)BY:
    /s/ Mark D. MorelandMark D. MorelandChief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
     (Principal Financial Officer)
#### HOWARD JOHNSON COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 77-1763.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 7, 1980.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, L. Joseph Ferrara, Kenneth D. Hipp, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants.

Derek I. Meier, Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WEICK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board appeals from that portion of a district court judgment, 444 F.Supp. 843, which required the Board to disclose to the employer copies of authorization cards obtained by a union during an organizational campaign. The district court held that the authorization cards were not exempt from disclosure under any of the exemption provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. This court recently held that union authorization cards fall within Exemption 6 of the Freedom of Information Act which covers “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” *Maderia Nursing Center, Inc. v. N. L. R. B.,*615 F.2d 728, 730 (6th Cir. 1980).

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to enter summary judgment'in favor of the National Labor Relations Board on this issue, in accordance with its previous motion.
#### IN THE MATTER OF BABY M., A PSEUDONYM FOR AN ACTUAL PERSON.

November 21, 1986.

Motion for leave to appeal by Mary Beth and Richard Whitehead is denied to the extent that it seeks relief from the orders of the trial court on temporary custody and the barring of certain expert testimony; and it is further

ORDERED that leave to appeal is otherwise granted, and the order barring movants from being present in the courtroom during the testimony of Mrs. Stern on her medical condition and prohibiting counsel from discussing and conferring with mov-ants on matters related to that issue is summarily reversed; provided, however, that neither movants nor their counsel shall be permitted to disclose the medical information obtained in *50depositions pending the trial of this matter. Jurisdiction is not retained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD F. OLIVER.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
ex_316878.htm


 


Exhibit 10.19


 


Amendment No. 4 to the


Executive Employment Agreement


between Track Group, Inc. and Derek Cassell 


Dated December 1, 2016


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 to that certain Executive Employment Agreement by and between Track Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek Cassell (the “Executive”) entered into as of December 15, 2021.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated December 1, 2016, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on February 13, 2017, Amendment No. 2 on December 13, 2017, Amendment No. 3 on December 21, 2020 (together, the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.    Paragraph 5A. of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“A.         Employment Term of Agreement. The “Employment Term” of this Agreement shall commence on shall commence on October 1, 2016 and shall continue in effect until terminated by either party in accordance with the terms herein.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment No. 4 to the Executive Employment Agreement between Track Group, Inc. and Derek Cassell dated December 15, 2021, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.


 


	
			TRACK GROUP, INC.


			 


			 

				
			EXECUTIVE


			 


			 

			
	
			By: /s/ Guy Dubois 


			Guy Dubois  


			Chairman of the Board

				
			/s/ Derek Cassell


			Derek Cassell
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn 

Clerk of Court 

Stephanie Freeman 

Panel Attorney 

Kathryn Plonsky 

Panel Attorney 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

BYRON WHITE UNITED STATES 

COURTHOUSE

1823 STOUT STREET

DENVER, COLORADO 80257 

(303) 335-2900 

FAX: (303) 335-2999 

www.bap10.uscourts.gov 

Laura Guice

Attorney Deputy Clerk

Gregory Wright

Deputy Clerk

April 06, 2010 

 

 

TO: All Parties 

RE: William Punchard v. Kieran Ryan 

BAP No.: NM-10-016 

Bk. No.: 09-13443 

The Court has today filed an order dismissing the appeal in the above case. A copy of the order 

is enclosed for all parties. A courtesy copy of this decision has been electronically docketed to 

the Bankruptcy Court's electronic case filing system. Judgment in this appeal has been entered 

today. In accordance with 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8016-3, the mandate will issue immediately after 

the time for filing a motion for rehearing. 

Please contact this office if you have any questions. 

 Very truly yours, 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

cc: 

 

Norman H. Meyer Jr, Clerk of Court 

BAP Appeal No. 10-16 Docket No. 5-1 Filed: 04/06/2010 Page: 1 of 1