alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 418 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 418

    Urging the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the cultural 
 significance of Rib Mountain by adding it to the National Register of 
                            Historic Places.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2017

Mr. Duffy (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Grothman, 
and Mr. Kind) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Urging the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the cultural 
 significance of Rib Mountain by adding it to the National Register of 
                            Historic Places.

Whereas Paul Bunyan is a larger-than-life folk hero who embodies the frontier 
        spirit, might, the willingness to work hard, and the resolve to overcome 
        all obstacles;
Whereas reliable documentation establishes that the earliest story about Paul 
        Bunyan was told north of Tomahawk, Wisconsin;
Whereas this evidence suggests that Wisconsin's claim that it is the birthplace 
        of Paul Bunyan is superior to claims from other States;
Whereas Paul Bunyan has been the subject of countless literary compositions, 
        musical pieces, commercial works, and theatrical productions;
Whereas local legend states that the ``ribs'' in Rib Mountain, Wisconsin, denote 
        that the mountain is the burial site of Paul Bunyan;
Whereas Rib Mountain is nearly 4 miles long and peaks at 1,924 feet above sea 
        level and 670 feet above the local terrain, making it the highest 
        natural feature in North Central Wisconsin and one of the highest points 
        in the entire State of Wisconsin;
Whereas Rib Mountain is home to the Granite Peak Ski Area, one of the first ski 
        areas in North America, where thousands of visitors come annually to ski 
        or snowboard;
Whereas Rib Mountain State Park, situated on Rib Mountain, is over 1,500 acres 
        and boasts a well-maintained network of hiking and nature trails with 
        breathtaking views; and
Whereas Rib Mountain State Park attracts visitors from the local community as 
        well as from across the State and the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) affirms the importance of Rib Mountain to the culture 
        and economy of Wisconsin;
            (2) recognizes the legend of Paul Bunyan as the embodiment 
        of the frontier spirit; and
            (3) requests that the Secretary of the Interior recognize 
        the legendary burial site of Paul Bunyan by adding Rib Mountain 
        to the National Register of Historic Places.
                                 <all>
```
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Re-Acquiring Reliable and Affordable Mid-Range Launch Vehicle Services 

2011-02-07 (SC-02) 

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that NASA take urgent action to re-acquire reliable and affordable 

mid-range launch services (Taurus XL to Delta II class) to enable access to space by its Earth 

and space science flight missions. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

There is a crisis in access to space in Earth and space science. The current stable ofmid-range 

launch vehicles are either not reliable (Taurus XL has failed in 3 of 4 last launches), or 

uncertified (Le., Minotaur, Taurus II, and Falcon 9), and launch failure does NOT change the 

certification level! 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

There are NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) flight missions in development for which 

there are no reliable launch vehicles available. These will be delayed at significant cost. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs. Our first action has been to convene the Mishap Investigation Board for the 

Taurus XLlT9 Glory Mission in order to understand the cause ofthe launch failure and set the 

stage for the necessary corrective actions that would allow the Taurus XL fleet to return to flight. 

The Launch Services Program (LSP) has also begun work with the U.S. launch industry, along 

with the Air Force and the National Reconnaissance Office, to assess the potential implications 

ofthe Taurus XL failure to other launch systems both within and external to the Orbital Sciences 

Corporation (OSC). In addition, NASA has recently opened its "on-ramp" period to allow new 

providers the opportunity to become a part ofthe NASA Launch Services II (NLS II) contract 

and to allow existing providers to offer additional launch vehicles. OSC has indicated that they 

plan to on-ramp their Taurus II launch vehicle, and United Launch Alliance (ULA) has indicated 

their intent to on-ramp their Delta-II launch vehicle. However, in the case ofthe Delta II, there 

are only five remaining Delta-lis left in inventory, and ULA has no plans to restart production. 

The key to meeting the future medium launch service category requirements will be 

demonstrated flight performance ofthe SpaceX Falcon 9 and the OSC Taurus II under the 

Commercial Orbital Transportation Services agreements and the International Space Station 

Commercial Resupply Service contracts. Flight data from these vehicles from their early 

development and initial resupply flights will guide the LSP in the conduct of the certification 

processes for these launch vehicles to gain their category 2 and 3 launch vehicle certifications. 

Enclosure
NO. SCPW-12-0000021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

WAYNE M. SAKAI and SAKAI IWANAGA SUTTON LAW GROUP, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RANDAL G.B VALENCIANO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT

COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I and

DTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 11-1-0076)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.

and Circuit Judge Chan, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioners Wayne M. Sakai and

Sakai Iwanaga Sutton Law Group's petition for a writ of mandamus

and the responses thereto, it appears that: (1) Cades Schutte, as

a result of its representation of petitioners, obtained

confidential information of a non-public nature that, if known to

any other client of Cades Schutte, could be used by such client

to petitioners' material disadvantage and (2) petitioners'

February 28, 2010 prospective conflict waiver did not, by its

terms, apply in such instance. Therefore, 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000021

17-MAY-2012

03:45 PM
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is granted. The respondent judge is directed to: (1)

vacate the December 12, 2011 order denying petitioners' motion to

disqualify Cades Schutte as plaintiff's counsel in Civil No. 11-

1-0076 and (2) enter an order disqualifying Cades Schutte as

plaintiff's counsel in Civil No. 11-1-0076.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 17, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan
Exhibit 4.24

    

     

      
        	
                 

              	
                
                  

                

              
	 	 
	 	
                Lan Huang, Ph.D. 

                

                Chief Executive Officer 

                

                
                  BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                    28 Liberty Street, 39th Floor

                  

                

                New York, NY 10005 

                Tel: 646.305.6387 

                

              


         

        

        
          December 9, 2019

          

          

          
            	
                    RE:

                  	
                    ANNUAL SALARY RAISE

                  


          

          Ramon W. Mohanlal

          

          

          Dear Ramon,

           

          We are pleased to offer you an increase in your annual base salary from $300,000.00 to $430,000.00. In addition, we are increasing your annual bonus opportunity from 30% of annual salary to 45% of annual salary
            (otherwise subject to the same terms and conditions in your Employment Agreement (defined below). This change will be effective retroactive to July 1, 2019. On the next payroll date following the date of this letter, you will receive a payment
            reflecting the increased salary for the period of July 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019.

           

          Except as expressly provided in this letter, your employment agreement with BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated as of April 1, 2016, as amended by that amendment dated as of November 10, 2016, (your
            “Employment Agreement”) shall remain in full force and effect.

           

          Again, congratulations on your achievement and we wish you all the very best in the coming years. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding your new compensation package.

           

          Sincerely,

           

          

          
            	
                    /s/ Lan Huang

                  	
                     

                  
	
                    Lan Huang, Ph.D.

                  	
                     

                  
	
                     

                  	
                     

                  
	
                    Agreed:

                  	 
	 	 
	
                    /s/ Ramon W. Mohanlal

                  	
                     

                  
	
                    Ramon W. Mohanlal
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 116 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 116

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 14, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House any joint resolution specified in section 2 of this 
resolution. All points of order against consideration of each such joint 
resolution are waived. Each such joint resolution shall be considered as read. 
All points of order against provisions in each such joint resolution are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each such joint 
resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  The joint resolutions referred to in the first section of this 
resolution are as follows:
     (a) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 66) disapproving the rule submitted by 
the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by States 
for non-governmental employees.
    (b) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 67) disapproving the rule submitted by 
the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by 
qualified State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Fred W. Wagenhals, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Action PerformanceCompanies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. /s/ Fred W. WagenhalsFred W. WagenhalsChief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification of Executive Chairman of the Board**

 

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

    (i)          the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

    (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: September 9, 2008

 

| /s/ Clyde B. Anderson           |
|---------------------------------|
| Clyde B. Anderson               |
| Executive Chairman of the Board |
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: MICHAEL DON GREENE, 

 Petitioner.

No. 09-5175

 (D.C. No. 4:04-CR-00209-TCK-1) 

ORDER

This matter is before the court based on a letter dated January 22, 2010 by Petitioner

Michael Don Greene requesting dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. The court

construes Petitioner’s letter as a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) to voluntarily dismiss

the mandamus petition. 

Upon consideration, the motion to voluntarily dismiss is GRANTED. The petition

for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-5175 Document: 01018358106 Date Filed: 01/28/2010 Page: 1
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                    /s/Gary Mentesana
                                   --------------------
                                        Gary Mentesana
                                        Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
                                        Arch Street VIII, Inc. as
                                        Managing General Partner of
                                        Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII,
                                        A Limited Partnership


                                        Date:  February 14, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Leonard P. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



Date:
November 13, 2003

|                                                                                  |  | /s/LEONARD P. SHAYKIN |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
|Leonard P. Shaykin
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
2 min read

# NASA to Select Lunar Terrain Vehicle for Artemis Missions

### Tiernan P. Doyle

Mar 19, 2024

MEDIA ADVISORYM24-042

NASA Headquarters

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA will host a news conference to announce the company, or companies, selected to move forward in developing the LTV (Lunar Terrain Vehicle), which will help Artemis astronauts explore more of the Moon’s surface on future missions. The televised event will take place at 4 p.m. EDT (3 p.m. CDT), Wednesday, April 3, at the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

The news conference will air live on NASA+, NASA Television, the NASA app, and the agency’s website. Learn how to stream NASA TV through a variety of platforms including social media.

Event participants will include:
            - Vanessa Wyche, director, NASA Johnson
            - Jacob Bleacher, chief exploration scientist, NASA Headquarters
            - Lara Kearney, manager, Extravehicular Activity and Human Surface Mobility Program, NASA Johnson

International media interested in participating in person must request credentials by 6 p.m. Thursday, March 21. U.S. media interested in attending in person must request credentials by 6 p.m. Wednesday, March 27. All media interested in participating by phone must request details by 2 p.m., April 3. To participate, contact the NASA Johnson newsroom at 281-483-5111 or jsccommu@mail.nasa.gov. NASA’s media accreditation policy is online.

Through Artemis, NASA will land the first woman, first person of color, and its first international partner astronaut on the surface of the Moon to explore for scientific discovery, economic benefits, and to build the foundation for crewed missions to Mars.

Learn more about NASA’s Artemis campaign at:

https://www.nasa.gov/artemis

-end-

Kathryn HambletonHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100kathryn.a.hambleton@nasa.gov

Victoria Ugalde / Nilufar RamjiJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111victoria.d.ugalde@nasa.gov / nilufar.ramji@nasa.gov

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

NASA Headquarters

## Related Terms

                - Artemis
                - Johnson Space Center
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER BRADLEY CHASE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30136

D.C. No. 1:15-cr-00095-SPW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017** 

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Bradley Chase appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 32-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

FILED

APR 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Chase’s

request for oral argument is denied.
being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Chase contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his

pre-sentencing rehabilitation and the minimal risk he believes he poses to the

public in view of his recovery. The court did not abuse its discretion in imposing

Chase’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The court

varied downward 14 months to account for Chase’s mitigating circumstances. The

below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the

number and nature of the guns Chase obtained and the other circumstances of the

offense. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

AFFIRMED.

2 16-30136
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS CITO.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.