alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# B200 – NASA

Official National Aeronautics and Space Administration Website

- Utilizing NASA’s B200 King Air to Study Snowmelt Levels More than 1 billion people rely on seasonal mountain snowmelt as a resource for their water supply and a team of NASA scientists and aircraft operators are measuring snow levels to better understand the contribution to our water resources. In a series of two deployments in early February and March, pilots from NASA Armstrong Flight [&#8230;]
- NASA’s C-20A deploys to Hawaii Following Volcanic Eruption Following the eruption of the world’s largest active volcano, Mauna Loa, NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center deployed its C-20A aircraft to Kona, Hawaii, to gather images and data of the active lava flows for submission to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) by a team of scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The plane [&#8230;]
- B200 King Air Mission Support and Research Aircraft NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, operates a Beechcraft B200 Super King Air aircraft. NASA tail number (TN) 801 serves as a testbed for various aeronautical research and airborne science projects. This B200 Super King Air also serves as a pilot proficiency aircraft as part of NASA’s support aircraft fleet (SAF). Experiments Flown [&#8230;]
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  MYERCOM, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)


         MYERCOM, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         1. The following  resolution has been unanimously  adopted by the board
of directors and a majority of the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance
with  Section 242 of the  Delaware  General  Corporation  Law for the purpose of
amending the corporation's Certificate of Incorporation.  The resolution setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED,  that the Certificate of  Incorporation of the Corporation be
         amended by changing the Article  thereof  numbered  "FIRST" so that, as
         amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

         FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Russian Athena, Inc.

         2.  That  said  amendment  was  duly  adopted  in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  FORCE 10  HOLDING,  INC.  has  caused  this
certificate  to be  signed by its duly
authorized officer, this 23rd day of April, 2004.


MYERCOM, INC.




Jehu Hand, President and Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferrnei REINA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50054.

D.C. No. CR-00-03209-TJW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2003.

Laura Duffy, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mary Kathryn Kelly, Esq., Christopher R.J. Pace, Esq., Cooley Godward LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ferrnei Reina appeals his conviction and 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine and possession of cocaine, with intent to distribute, on board a vessel, in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 1903(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Reina contends that the district court’s failure to adequately define the nature of the charges and fully comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 resulted in the entry of his guilty plea unknowingly and involuntarily. Because Reina failed to raise these objections in the district court, we review for plain error. *See United States v. Vonn, 535*U.S. 55, 122 S.Ct. 1043, 1046, 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002). After reviewing the entire record, *see id.*at 1055, we conclude that Reina did understand the essential elements of the offenses, and knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea. Moreover, the district court’s failure to fully comply with Rule 11 did not substantially affect Reina’s rights. *See id.*at 1094.

Reina also contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant a safety valve departure pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C1.2. Reviewing for clear error, we find none. *See United States v. Ajugwo,*82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996) (requiring defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies for the safety valve).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Dailey *v.*The State, on the Relation of Huffer.

No person can, according to the constitution, hold more than one lucrative office at the same time, except, &c.

The offices of county recorder and county commissioner are lucrative offices within the meaning of the constitution.

A county recorder, by accepting the office of county commissioner, vacates his office of recorder.

ERROR to the *Adams*Circuit Court.

Perkins, J.

Information in the nature of *quo warranto,*on the relation of *Jacob Huffer,*against *Esaias Dailey,*charging that the latter, on the 7th of *September,*1840, was the recorder of *Adams*county, *Indiana,*and that on that day he accepted, was sworn into, and entered upon the duties of, the office of county commissioner of said county, both of which offices he has ever since held, and still continues to hold. It avers that, by his acceptance of the office of county commissioner, he forfeited and vacated that of county recorder.

Demurrer to the information overruled, and judgment of ouster against the defendant.

It is conceded by the counsel for the plaintiff in error, that our constitution prohibits the holding, by one person at the same time, of two lucrative offices, with an exception not embracing this case; and it is also conceded that under our constitution the acceptance, by an incumbent of one lucrative office, of another such, vacates the former office; but it is contended that the Court erred in overruling the demurrer in this case; because, 1. The right to exercise the employment of county commissioner is not an office; 2. The right to exercise the employment of county recorder is not an office; and, 3. If they are offices, they are not both lucrative.

*330*H. Cooper,*for the plaintiff.

*A. A. Hammond, J. Smith,*and *S. Major,*for the defendant.

Sir *William Blackstone,*in the Second Book of his Commentaries, page 36, defines an office to be a right to exercise a public or private employment, and take the fees and emoluments thereunto belonging, whether public, as those of magistrates, or private, as of bailiffs, &c. Under this definition, it appears to us very clear that the right to exercise the duties, and take the compensation therefor, of county recorder, is an office; and equally so, the right to the employment and pay of a county commissioner. These employments are both treated as offices by our constitution and laws. R. S. 1843, pp. 97, 98, 122. We think, also, they are lucrative offices. Pay, supposed to be an adequate compensation, is affixed to the performance of their duties. We know of no other test for determining a “ lucrative office ” within the meaning of the constitution. The lucrativeness of an office — its net profits — does not depend upon the amount of compensation affixed to it. The expenses incident to an office with a high salary may render it less lucrative, in this latter sense, than other offices having a much lower rate of compensation.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
NASA Advisory Council Ad Hoc Task Force on

Science, Technology, Engineering

and Mathematics (STEM) Education

AGENDA

April 3, 2015

9:00 am-3:00 pm

NASA Headquarters, 4U23

9:00 Introduction of Task Force Members Chair and Members

9:15 Task Force Terms of Reference and Charge Chair

 

9:45 Federal STEM Strategic Plan D. James

 Committee on STEM (CoSTEM) Education E. Stofan

10:15 Break

10:30 Federal Partners R. Johnson 

11:00 NASA Strategic Plan and Education B. Girten

NASA Mission and Vision

NASA Goals & Education Objective

NASA Education Mission and Vision

11:30 NASA Education Overview D. James

Office of Education

Mission Directorates

Centers Offices of Education 

12:00 Lunch/Ethics Briefing A. Greenstone

1:00 NASA Education Implementation Plan Progress B. Girten

1:30 Discussion and Recommendations Chair and Members
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Montavo, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the period from ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.      /s/ Brook W. LangBrook W. Lang
CEO
Dated: April 13,  2009  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Montavo, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the period from ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.    /s/ Wong Peck LingWong Peck Ling
CFO
Dated: April 13, 2009  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

Mary W Jackson Building NASA Headquarters 

Washington, DC 20546-0001 

July 30, 2021 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group 

TO: Distribution 

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Federal 100 

Awards Gala on August 27, 2021 

On August 27, 2021, the Federal Computer Week ("FCW" - a publication of Public Sector 

360) will host an awards gala at the Grand Hyatt in Washington, DC from 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 

p.m. The event is to provide a venue for informal discussion on current challenges the 

aerospace community is facing. At the dinner, awards will be presented to various individuals 

and teams for outstanding contribution in the Federal Information Technology community. 

Approximately 700 people have been invited to attend the awards dinner gala. Attendees will 

have a diversity of views or interests and will include members of the legislative branch, 

personnel from academia, industry representatives, employees of other Federal agencies, state 

and local government officials, and members of the media. The estimated value of the event, 

including all food and beverages, is $155 per person. The FCW is in control of the all the 

planning and invitations for the event. 

Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding 

various NASA programs. There is also an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend 

these events because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas 

and views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs and operations. I find that the event 

meets the requirements of a ''widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g). 

Accordingly, NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the 

interests of the FCW-including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required 

to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989-may accept an invitation from the 

FCW for free attendance for themselves and a guest to this event. In those circumstances, I 

find that the Agency's interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may 

be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties. 
2 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the FCW, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or 

administering a Space Act Agreement, or who receive an invitation from a party other than 

the event host, FCW, should seek a separate determination from their local NASA ethics 

office as to whether they may accept the invitation. Attendees are reminded to exercise any 

COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone 

2
108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1663 

AN ACT 

To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

2 

S 1663 ES 

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BAR2 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 2 maps subtitled ‘‘NC–07P’’, 

4 relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit des5 ignated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear 

6 Unit NC–07P, that are included in the set of maps enti7 tled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to 

8 in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 3503(a)), are hereby replaced by 2 other maps re10 lating to those units entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources 

11 System Cape Fear Unit, NC–07P’’ and dated February 

12 18, 2003. 

13 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

14 shall keep the maps referred to in subsection (a) on file 

15 and available for inspection in accordance with the provi16 sions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

17 (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Passed the Senate November 6, 2003. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1663 

AN ACT 

To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources 

System maps.
Exhibit 4.387

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS,

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 173865 dated October 12, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services for voice

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

Research and production association «Progressivniye Technologii»

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1025001631137

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

5013008091

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

7A, Amet-Khan Sultana str.,Zhukovsky, Moscow region, 140180

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 12, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 06, 2019 No. 266-pчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
# Sitemap

## September 21, 2018

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2018
- 09
- September 21, 2018

            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump Visits Johnson Space Center
            - Celebrate NASA’s 60th Anniversary at Glenn’s Visitor Center
            - Robust Verification Tools for Precision Entry Guidance
            - Robust Entry and Landing Guidance Under Dynamic Uncertainty
            - Optimized Entry and Powered Descent Guidance for Precision Planetary Landing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDOLPH SANDERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 12 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3721

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Darryl Walker, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 6, 2009

 Filed: March 17, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Walker appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he pled

guilty to a firearm offense. On appeal, Walker seeks a remand for resentencing in

light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558

(2007), and Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007), both decided after his

sentencing. We decline to remand for resentencing, and we affirm.
-2-

We find nothing in Kimbrough to warrant a remand for resentencing. See

Kimbrough, 128 S. Ct. at 564 (holding that cocaine Guidelines, like all other

Guidelines, are advisory only); United States v. Roberson, 517 F.3d 990, 995 (8th Cir.

2008) (Kimbrough held that sentencing court did not abuse its discretion by

considering disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences). Likewise, we

conclude that a remand under Gall is not required because there is no indication in the

record that the district court applied an “extraordinary circumstances” standard. See

Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 594-95 (rejecting appellate court’s requirement of extraordinary

circumstances to support extraordinary variance, but allowing court to take degree of

variance into account and consider extent of deviation from Guidelines).

We also conclude that Walker’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See

United States v. Phelps, 536 F.3d 862, 869 (8th Cir. 2008) (defendant does not forfeit

attack on substantive reasonableness of sentence by failing to object in district court;

substantive reasonableness of sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert.

denied, 2009 WL 177236 (U.S. Feb. 23, 2009); United States v. Long Soldier, 431

F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 2005) (abuse of discretion occurs if court fails to consider

relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight

to improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only appropriate factors but commits

clear error of judgment in weighing factors).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

       CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
       SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002


     I, Jim McAlpine, the Chief Executive Officer of Magna Entertainment Corp.
("MEC"), certify that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEC for the year ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEC.


/s/Jim McAlpine
Jim McAlpine
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 27, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Magna Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Magna
Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                        1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00297

- CR
Alejandro Barrientes

v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- DCR

- 657

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 25, 2015
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                      |                                   |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                      | **OCTuS,                  Inc.,****a Nevada corporation**                 |
|                                 |                                                                 |                              |
| Date: August                21, 2006 | By:                                                             | /s/ Josie                Ben Rubi |
|                                      | Josie                  Ben RubiChief                    Executive Officer |