Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65533 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Express Mail Contract 9 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Supporting Data, October 4, 2010 (Request). 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2011–1 and CP2011–2; 

Order No. 554] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service filing to 

add Express Mail Contract 9 to the 

competitive product list. The Postal 

Service has also filed a related contract. 

This notice addresses procedural steps 

associated with the filing. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

by telephone for advice on alternatives 

to electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 

CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service 

filed a formal request and associated 

supporting information to add Express 

Mail Contract 9 to the competitive 

product list.1 The Postal Service asserts 

that Express Mail Contract 9 is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal 

Service states that prices and 

classification underlying this contract 

are supported by Governors’ Decision 

No. 09–14 in Docket No. MC2010–5. Id. 

The Request has been assigned Docket 

No. MC2011–1. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The contract has been 

assigned Docket No. CP2011–2. 

Request. In support of its Request, the 

Postal Service filed six attachments as 

follows: 

1. Attachment A—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 09–14, 

originally filed in Docket No. MC2010– 

5, authorizing certain Express Mail 

contracts; 

2. Attachment B—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

3. Attachment C—a proposed change 

in the Mail Classification Schedule 

competitive product list; 

4. Attachment D—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

5. Attachment E—a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and 

6. Attachment F—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Brian G. Denneny, Acting 

Manager, Sales and Communications, 

Expedited Shipping, asserts that the 

service to be provided under the 

contract will cover its attributable costs, 

make a positive contribution to 

institutional costs, and increase 

contribution toward the requisite 5.5 

percent of the Postal Service’s total 

institutional costs. Id., Attachment D. 

Thus, Mr. Denneny contends there will 

be no issue of subsidization of 

competitive products by market 

dominant products as a result of this 

contract. Id. 

Related contract. A redacted version 

of the specific Express Mail Contract 9 

is included with the Request. The 

contract will become effective the day 

that the Commission provides all 

necessary regulatory approvals. It is 

terminable upon 30 days’ notice by a 

party but could continue for 3 years. 

The Postal Service represents that the 

contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 

3633(a). See id., Attachment D. 

The Postal Service maintains that the 

contract and related financial 

information, including the customer’s 

name and the accompanying analyses 

that provide prices, terms, conditions, 

cost data, and financial projections 

should remain under seal. See 

Attachment F. It also requests that the 

Commission order that the duration of 

such treatment of all customeridentifying information be extended 

indefinitely, instead of ending after 10 

years. Id. at 7. 

II. Notice of Filings 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–1 and CP2011–2 for 

consideration of the Request pertaining 

to the proposed Express Mail Contract 9 

product and the related contract, 

respectively. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s filings in the captioned 

dockets are consistent with the policies 

of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 

CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR 3020, subpart 

B. Comments are due no later than 

October 13, 2010. The public portions of 

these filings can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Paul L. 

Harrington to serve as Public 

Representative in these dockets. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–1 and CP2011–2 for 

consideration of the matters raised in 

each docket. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. 

Harrington is appointed to serve as 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

proceedings. 

3. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

October 13, 2010. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26831 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Data Collection Available for Public 

Comments and Recommendations 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 

notice announces the Small Business 

Administration’s intentions to request 

approval on a new and/or currently 

approved information collection. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

December 27, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send all comments 

regarding whether this information 

collection is necessary for the proper 

performance of the function of the 

agency, whether the burden estimates 

are accurate, and if there are ways to 

minimize the estimated burden and 

enhance the quality of the collection, to 

George Solomon, Senior Policy Advisor, 

Office of Entrepreneurial Education, 

Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 

Street, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 

20416. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George Solomon, Office of Senior 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65534 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

1Applicants request that any relief granted 

pursuant to the application also apply to any other 

company of which Citigroup is or hereafter may 

become an affiliated person within the meaning of 

section 2(a)(3) of the Act (together with the 

Applicants, the ‘‘Covered Persons’’). 

Policy, 202–205–7426 

george.solomon@sba.gov Curtis B. Rich, 

Management Analyst, 202–205–7030 

curtis.rich@sba.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office 

of Entrepreneurial Development (ED) 

needs to collect information on the 

impact of training programs delivered 

by both its resource partners—SCORE, 

SBDC and WBCs and focused initiatives 

like E200 using a uniform methodology 

in order to provide generally accepted 

outcome measures and to report to 

Congress and the President on these 

programs. Respondents are small 

business owners and potential small 

business owners from throughout the 

U.S. and the territories. 

Title: ‘‘Impact of Training Programs.’’ 

Description of Respondents: Small 

business owners and potential small 

business owners from throughout the 

U.S. and the territories. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Annual Responses: 600,000. 

Annual Burden: 100,000. 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26790 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Immediate Disaster Assistance 

Program (IDAP) 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration (SBA). 

ACTION: Notice of IDAP loan program 

interest rates. 

SUMMARY: This Notice announces the 

maximum allowable rates for Immediate 

Disaster Assistance Program (IDAP) 

loans. 

DATES: Effective Date: The interest rate 

is effective October 25, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Grady Hedgespeth, Director of Financial 

Assistance, at (202) 205–7562 or 

Grady.Hedgespeth@sba.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Food, 

Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

(the Farm Act), Public Law 110–246, 

enacted June 18, 2008, amended the 

Small Business Act (the Act) and 

authorized changes to make SBA’s 

disaster assistance program more 

accessible to disaster victims. One 

provision included in the Farm Act 

requires SBA to implement an 

Immediate Disaster Assistance Program 

(IDAP) to provide interim loans to 

businesses affected by a disaster that 

meet the basic eligibility standards for a 

disaster loan authorized under section 

7(b) of the Act. The provision authorizes 

SBA to provide an 85 percent guarantee 

on loans made by participating lenders 

for up to $25,000. The intent of the 

IDAP loan program is to provide bridge 

financing as quickly and as prudently as 

possible following a declared disaster 

while the business is awaiting approval 

for permanent financing through a 

direct disaster loan from SBA. 

Agency regulations implementing the 

IDAP loan program state that the 

maximum interest rates an IDAP Lender 

may charge an IDAP Borrower during 

the Initial Period and Term Period will 

be published in the Federal Register 

from time to time. 13 CFR 123.703(e). 

This notice establishes the maximum 

interest rates for IDAP loans as follows: 

Initial Period: The maximum interest 

rate an IDAP Lender may charge an 

IDAP Borrower during the Initial Period 

(as defined in 13 CFR 123.700(b)(1)) is 

the prime rate in effect on the first 

business day of the month in which 

SBA receives the IDAP loan application, 

as printed in a national financial 

newspaper published each business 

day, plus one percentage point. The 

interest rate must remain fixed while 

the IDAP loan is in the Initial Period. 

Term Period: In the event that the 

IDAP loan enters the Term Period (as 

defined in 13 CFR 123.700(b)(17)), the 

interest rate may remain fixed at a rate 

not to exceed the maximum rate for the 

Initial Period as described above or may 

begin to fluctuate at a variable rate that 

is not more than the prime rate in effect 

on the first business day of the month 

in which the Term Period begins, as 

printed in a national financial 

newspaper published each business 

day, plus one percentage point. If the 

rate during the Term Period is a variable 

rate, the lender must specify in the Note 

the frequency at which the interest rate 

adjustment will occur (the ‘‘adjustment 

period’’), and such adjustments may not 

occur more frequently than monthly. 

The lender shall adjust the interest rate 

on the first calendar day of each 

adjustment period using the prime rate 

in effect on the first business day of the 

adjustment period, plus one percentage 

point. The change in interest rate is 

effective on that day whether or not the 

lender gives the borrower notice of the 

change. The adjustment period may not 

be changed without the written 

agreement of the borrower. 

Any future change to interest rates on 

IDAP Loans will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 657n and 13 CFR 

§ 123.703(e). 

Eric R. Zarnikow, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Capital 

Access. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26921 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Investment Company Act Release No. IC– 

29464; 812–13808] 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc., et al.; 

Notice of Application and Temporary 

Order 

October 19, 2010. 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’). 

ACTION: Temporary order and notice of 

application for a permanent order under 

section 9(c) of the Investment Company 

Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’). 

SUMMARY: Summary of Application: 

Applicants have received a temporary 

order exempting them from section 9(a) 

of the Act, with respect to an injunction 

entered against Citigroup Inc. 

(‘‘Citigroup’’) on October 19, 2010 by the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia (the ‘‘Injunction’’), 

until the Commission takes final action 

on an application for a permanent order. 

Applicants also have applied for a 

permanent order. 

Applicants: Citigroup Global Markets 

Inc. (‘‘CGMI’’), CEFOF GP I Corp. 

(‘‘CEFOF’’), CELFOF GP Corp. 

(‘‘CELFOF’’), Citibank, N.A. (‘‘Citibank’’), 

Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC 

(‘‘Citigroup Alternative’’), Consulting 

Group Advisory Services LLC 

(‘‘Advisory Services’’), Citigroup Capital 

Partners I GP I Corp. (‘‘CCP I’’), and 

Citigroup Capital Partners I GP II Corp. 

(‘‘CCP II’’) (collectively, ‘‘Applicants’’).1

DATES: Filing Date: The application was 

filed on July 29, 2010 and amended on 

July 30, 2010, and amended on October 

19, 2010. 

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An 

order granting the application will be 

issued unless the Commission orders a 

hearing. Interested persons may request 

a hearing by writing to the 

Commission’s Secretary and serving 

Applicants with a copy of the request, 

personally or by mail. Hearing requests 

should be received by the Commission 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES