U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
    Merit System Principles
      MSP 1 Q & A
MSP 2 Q & A
MSP 3 Q & A
MSP 4 Q & A
MSP 5 Q & A
MSP 6 Q & A
MSP 7 Q & A
MSP 8 Q & A
MSP 9 Q & A
FAQ
    Search & Site Index Merit System Principle 2: Fair and Equitable Treatment
	“All employees  and applicants for employment should receive fair and equitable treatment in  all aspects of personnel management without regard to political affiliation,  race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or  handicapping condition, and with proper regard for their privacy and  constitutional rights.”
**What  is the intent behind the second Merit System Principle?** 
The second principle, concerning fair  and equitable treatment, sets forth the vision that Federal personnel  management be free of unfair treatment and discrimination, where decisions are  made solely on legitimate merit-based considerations.  Requiring decision making without regard to  political affiliation echoes the intent of the Pendleton  Act of 1883 which replaced the patronage system with a merit system.  Requiring decision making without regard to race,  color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or handicapping  condition echoes the purpose behind Title VII of the Civil  Rights Act of 1964 and related  laws barring discrimination in employment.  The final clause makes clear that employees  and applicants for employment are entitled to the protections of the  Bill of Rights and the  Privacy Act.**What  is the MSPB’s role in protecting the second Merit System Principle?**
   As its name implies, the Merit Systems  Protection Board (MSPB) protects the merit system by adjudicating appeals within  its jurisdiction.  The employee may  engage in discovery and request a hearing.  Among other things, Board review will consider  whether the disciplinary action was taken based upon prohibited discrimination,  retaliation, or for reasons which do not promote the efficiency of the Federal  service.  When an employee has proven  intentional discrimination, the Board may award compensatory damages except  where the discrimination was based on marital status or age.  The Board may even review appeals filed by  probationary employees who allege that they were terminated based on partisan  political reasons or marital status discrimination.  However, the MSPB’s review authority is  limited to those matters Congress and the Office of Personnel Management have  given it.  Thus, although this merit  principle seeks fair treatment “in all aspects of personnel management,” the  Board may not review a claimed violation of the principle relating to a matter over  which it lacks authority.
 **Doesn’t  the EEOC also handle discrimination cases?  I’m confused.**
   The authority of the MSPB and the Equal  Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) overlap in “mixed cases,” those cases  involving an action otherwise appealable to the MSPB (e.g., a removal) and  allegations of discrimination.  While the  EEOC has responsibility for enforcing all Federal  equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws and the duty to coordinate and lead the  Federal government’s effort to eradicate workplace discrimination, the MSPB  also has the responsibility to determine if the personnel actions it has  authority to review were taken in accordance with law, to include the  anti-discrimination laws.  In certain  circumstances, the employee may choose whether to file an EEO complaint or an  MSPB appeal in the first instance.  Regardless  of that election, both agencies may ultimately review the case.  If the employee files an EEO complaint first, he or she can appeal to the Board after receiving a Final Agency Decision on the EEO  complaint, or 180 days after the filing the EEO complaint if a final decision has not yet been received.  If the  appellant files an MSPB appeal first, he or she may appeal the Board’s finding on  the discrimination issue to the EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations.
 **Has the MSPB studied the issue of equity?** 
     MSPB studies examining the treatment of Federal employees by demographic group include the 2009 report Fair and Equitable Treatment: Progress Made and Challenges Remaining and the 2011 report Women in the Federal Government: Ambitions and Achievements, which updated earlier reports, Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Progress Report on Minority Employment in the Federal Government (1996) and A Question of Equity: Women and the Glass Ceiling in the Federal Government (1992). A 1997 report, Achieving a Representative Federal Workforce: Addressing the Barriers to Hispanic Representation, examined the challenges unique to Hispanic employees.
 MSPB’s periodic Merit Principles Survey includes core items that address employee perceptions regarding the occurrence of PPPs, such as discrimination based on political affiliation, race, religion, sex, marital status, age and disability. Trends in Federal employee opinions regarding discrimination have been presented in reports such as Prohibited Personnel Practices: Employee Perceptions (2011). Results of the Merit Principles Surveys have also been analyzed by demographic variables such as ethnicity, race and sex in reports such asThe Federal Government: A Model Employer or a Work in Progress? (2008) and Fair and Equitable Treatment: Progress Made and Challenges Remaining (2009). As reported in the 2009 report, Fair and Equitable Treatment: Progress Made and Challenges Remaining, survey responses have consistently indicated a downward trend (since 1996) in the prevalence of perceived discrimination based on race/national origin, sex and age, with discrimination based on marital status, disability, religion and political affiliation remaining below four percent. These results suggest improvement in employees’ perceptions regarding how well Federal agencies adhere to MSP 2, but survey results also suggest there is still some room for improvement.


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov