alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2 min read

# Philadelphia Eagles To Honor NASA Astronaut Chris Ferguson During Monday Night Football Nov. 7

### NASA

Oct 31, 2011

RELEASE11-368

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

HOUSTON – NASA astronaut Chris Ferguson will return to his hometown on Nov. 7 to serve as the Philadelphia Eagles’ Honorary Captain during the NFL’s “Monday Night Football” game. The Eagles are hosting the Chicago Bears at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, beginning at 8:30 p.m. EDT.Ferguson will be recognized on the field for his dedication to America’s space program and his leadership commanding the final flight of space shuttle Atlantis. The 13-day mission marked the end of the shuttle program’s 30-year legacy with Atlantis’ touchdown on July 21, 2011.Ferguson, who joined the astronaut corps in August 1998, is visiting Philadelphia to spread NASA’s message about the importance of space research and exploration. Before the game, Ferguson will visit the Please Touch Museum from 1 to 2:30 p.m. While at the children’s museum he will participate in story time and sign autographs.To schedule an interview or for more information about Ferguson’s appearances in Philadelphia, contact Tammie Letroise-Brown at 281-483-4942 or tammie.r.letroise-brown@nasa.gov.For more about NASA and its programs, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov

For complete biographical information on Ferguson and other astronaut information, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/astronauts

– end –

text-only version of this release

Michael CurieHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100michael.curie@nasa.govTammie Letroise-BrownJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-4942tammie.r.letroise-brown@nasa.gov
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in
the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said reports in the Registration Statements of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-125566, effective June 6, 2005) and on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-127961, effective September 7, 2005, File No. 333-135704,
effective September 12, 2006, and File No. 333-146586, effective November 28, 2007).



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
|Tulsa, Oklahoma       
|February 27, 2009
2 min read

# NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Releases 2018 Annual Report

### NASA

Feb 08, 2019

RELEASE19-003

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credits: NASA**

The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP), an advisory committee that reports to NASA and Congress, issued its 2018 annual report Friday examining the agency’s safety performance over the past year and highlighting accomplishments, issues and concerns. 

The report is based on the panel’s 2018 fact-finding and quarterly public meetings; “insight” visits and meetings; direct observations of NASA operations and decision-making processes; discussions with NASA management, employees and contractors; and the panel members’ own experience.

“As NASA transitions from development to operational launch and flight of its astronauts – something it has not done for several years, since the end of the shuttle era – it is essential to remain cognizant of the perils inherent to spaceflight,” said ASAP Chair Patricia Sanders. “Given the great uncertainties of the space operational environment, it is critical to maintain vigilance and attention to test results, engineering understanding, disciplined processes, and consideration of mitigation alternatives. We have often commented on the need for constancy of purpose for exploration, but along with that must go constancy of standards for certification, flight test, and acceptable risk.” 

The report highlights 2018 activities and includes assessments of NASA’s:
            - Exploration Systems Development
            - Commercial Crew Program 
            - Deep space exploration 
            - International Space Station operations 
            - Aeronautics missions and air operations, and
            - Enterprise protection

The report notes NASA’s progress in addressing safety issues for the pending test and crewed flights of the Commercial Crew Program, and ongoing work to assess concerns for the Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System rocket as they move toward their first integrated flight test.  

Congress established the panel in 1968 to provide advice and make recommendations to the NASA administrator on safety matters after the 1967 Apollo 1 fire that claimed the lives of three American astronauts.

For more information about the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, and to view the 2018 report, visit:

-end-

Grey HautaluomaHeadquarters, Washington202-358-0668grey.hautaluoma-1@nasa.gov
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




*On
      March 21, 2003, Medi-Hut terminated the employment of its four senior officers
      due to corporate mismanagement in the form of accounting irregularities and
      securities fraud during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2002 and 2001. At
      the
      time of their termination, all of these former officers were the subject of
      an
      investigation by the United States Department of Justice and three were subject
      to an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In August 19,
      2003, as a result of the United States Department of Justice investigation,
      three of the former officers pled guilty to conspiring to inflate the revenue
      and earnings of the Company and for lying to investigators and the fourth former
      officer pled guilty to obstruction of justice. Also in August 19, 2003, the
      former officers who were under investigation by the Securities and Exchange
      Commission agreed to a consent decree with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission. As a result of the actions of the former officers of Medi-Hut,
      certain portions of this report have been omitted where the information was
      incomplete or could not be adequately verified by the Company’s current
      management and/or the Company’s independent auditors. Consequently, the
      Company’s current Chief Financial Officer is unable to include the certification
      required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00095-CR

WILLIE MEDFORD, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28497

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Willie Medford, Jr., appellant, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and 

sentenced to twenty months in a state jail facility. Medford’s notice of appeal was timely filed 

May 13, 2013. The clerk’s record was filed June 18, 2013, and the reporter’s record was filed 

June 19, 2013, making appellant’s brief due July 19, 2013. Counsel is appointed. 

After one extension, appellant’s brief was due August 9, 2013. On August 30, 2013, this 

Court advised counsel for appellant that the appellate brief was three weeks past due, without a 

request for more time or any explanation to this Court for its absence. We warned counsel that if 

appellant’s brief and an adequate explanation for the delay were not received within ten days of 

the August 30 letter, the appeal would be subject to abatement to the trial court for a hearing. 

Rather than filing the brief with an adequate explanation for the delay, counsel for appellant filed 

another motion seeking a sixty-day extension of the briefing deadline. On September 17, 2013, 

this Court overruled the motion for a sixty-day extension of the briefing deadline and ordered 

appellant’s brief to be filed with this Court on or before October 8, 2013. 

Counsel for appellant ignored the order of this Court and failed to file appellant’s brief. 

Because the brief has not been filed and because we have heard nothing further from appellant’s 

counsel, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

38.8(b) for a hearing to determine why counsel has not filed the brief, whether the brief can be 

promptly filed with this Court, whether Medford desires to prosecute this appeal, and whether he 

is indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The hearing is to be conducted within fifteen days of 
3

the date of this order. The trial court may also address other matters as it deems appropriate, 

including appointing different counsel for appellant, if necessary. 

The trial court’s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be 

entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental 

clerk’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). The 

reporter’s record of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental 

reporter’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See id. 

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s 

brief or (2) the supplemental appellate record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 16, 2013
*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JERRY L. MASKE,

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 09-1538

v. (D. of Colo.)

MARY CHAPPELL,

Respondent-Appellee.

(D.C. No. 09-cv-2754-ZLW)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.** 

This appeal arises out of multiple case filings in district court for a Writ of

Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Jerry Maske is a frequent filer

in district court and is subject to filing restrictions. Because Maske failed to

follow filing requirements, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice.

Maske now requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to pursue an

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (requiring a COA to appeal a denial of a

Appellate Case: 09-1538 Document: 01018367503 Date Filed: 02/16/2010 Page: 1
-2-

habeas application). He makes the same arguments he made in Maske v. Murphy,

No. 09-1536, (10th Cir. Feb. 16, 2010). For the same reasons set forth in that

case, we DENY the application for a COA. 

Because his application for a COA is frivolous, we DENY his request to

proceed in forma pauperis. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Timothy M. Tymkovich

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 09-1538 Document: 01018367503 Date Filed: 02/16/2010 Page: 2
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Division**

----

****

----

**The Apollo 12 Flight JournalDavid Woods and Lennox J. Waugh**

----

*Apollo 12 Flight Journal*
Apollo Flight Journal

Like its companion, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, it is intended to be a resource for all those interested in the Apollo program, whether in a passing or scholarly capacity. This journal covers the flight of Apollo 12 from launch to splashdown. As a living document, it will continue to grow and evolve.

Journals for other Apollo flights are available at the AFJ Portal.

----

##### Travelling from the Earth to the Moon

- Day 1, part 1: Launch and Reaching Earth Orbit
- Day 1, part 2: Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection
- Day 1, part 3: Transposition, Docking and Extraction
- Day 1, part 4: LM Inspection
- Day 1, part 5: PTC and back over to the LM
- Day 2, part 1: Midcourse Correction 2 Burn
- Day 2, part 2: Quiet end to the day
- Day 3, part 1: Day of the Tuna Fish
- Day 3, part 2: TV Show
- Day 4, part 1: Approaching the Moon
- Day 4, part 2: Lunar Orbit Insertion

##### Lunar Orbit

- Day 4, part 3: Lunar Orbit Revolutions 1 and 2
- Day 4, part 4: Lunar Orbit Revolutions 3 to 5
- Day 5, part 1: Prepare for Lunar Descent
- Apollo 12 Lunar Surface Journal
- Day 5, part 2: *Yankee Clipper* Rev 14 to 24
- Day 6, part 1: *Yankee Clipper* Rev 24 to 28
- Day 6, part 2: From the Snowman to Docking
- Day 6, part 3: LM Jettison, Rev 33 to 35
- Day 7, part 1: Revolutions 36 to 43

##### Homeward journey to Earth

- Day 7, part 2: Rev 44 to Trans-Earth Injection
- Day 8, part 1: Cislunar Navigation
- Day 8, part 2: Geology Questions
- Day 9: Navigate to Question Time
- Day 10: Splashdown for 3 Tail Hookers

----

- Apollo 12 Documents  (with thanks to Bob Andrepont)
- Photography Index
- Audio Index

----

**More than SCE to AUX - Apollo 12 Lightning Strike Incident**

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### Unless otherwise stated, these files are copyright © 2005-2020. W. David Woods and Lennox J. Waugh.

----
#### Foote and Another *v.*Bragg.

*Smith,*the payee of a promissory note, indorsed it thus, “ Pay the'bearer,— *S. Smith,”*and delivered it to *A. Held,*that *A.*might erase the words “Pay the hearer,” and insert in their place, over *Smith’s*signature, a formal assignment to himself.

*Tuesday, July*28.

■ ERROR to the Union-Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit by the assignees of a promissory note against the maker. Plea in bar, that *Smith,*the payee, assigned'the note as follows, “ Pay the *bearer,*— S. *Smith;”*and that the plaintiffs, without the knowledge or consent of *Smith*or of the defendant, erased the words,' “ Pay the bearer,” and inserted in their place, over *Smith’s*signature, a formal assignment to themselves. Replication, that *Smith*made the first indorsement, and delivered the note to the plaintiffs; that they were and still are the bearers and *bona fide,*holders of the note; and that they had a right to make the alteration. General demurrer to the replication and judgment for the defendant.

The payee, by indorsing the note to the bearer, and delivering it to the plaintiffs as the bearers, must be considered as having indorsed the note to ;the plaintiffs. By the term bearer, as the replication shows, the plaintiffs were desig*364nated. The effect of the first indorsement was, therefore, the same with that of the second; and-the alteration was not material.

*J. Ryman,*for the plaintiffs.

C. *B. Smith*and *J. S'. Newman,*for the defendant.

The defendant relies on *M'Nitt*v. *Hatch,*4 Blackf. 531. That case only decides, that the legal interest of a note payable to a certain person or bearer, cannot be transferred merely by delivery, unless it be payable at a chartered bank within the state. It has no application to the case before us.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
# STS-129 Crew Members head for Launch Pad 39A

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - At NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the astronauts on the STS-129 crew, dressed in their orange launch-and-entry suits, wave to spectators as they walk out of the Operations and Checkout Building for the 15-minute ride in the Astrovan to Launch Pad 39A. In the left column, from the front, are Commander Charles O. Hobaugh and Mission Specialists Leland Melvin and Mike Foreman. In the right column, from the front, are Pilot Barry E. Wilmore and Mission Specialists Randy Bresnik and Robert L. Satcher Jr. Liftoff is set for 2:28 p.m. EST Nov. 16. On STS-129, the crew will deliver two Express Logistics Carriers to the International Space Station, the largest of the shuttle's cargo carriers, containing 15 spare pieces of equipment including two gyroscopes, two nitrogen tank assemblies, two pump modules, an ammonia tank assembly and a spare latching end effector for the station's robotic arm. Atlantis will return to Earth a station crew member, Nicole Stott, who has spent more than two months aboard the orbiting laboratory. STS-129 is slated to be the final space shuttle Expedition crew rotation flight. For information on the STS-129 mission and crew, visit https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/shuttlemissions/sts129/index.html. Photo credit: NASA/Kim Shiflett  

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts129-s-008/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 16, 2009ProducerJSCSize1349x1920pxPIA Numbersts129-s-008The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
1 

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 13-2285 

 13-2289 

 13-2291 

 13-2320 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

PEDRO LUIS RAMÍREZ-RIVERA, a/k/a Peter Pai; 

JOSÉ LAUREANO-SALGADO, a/k/a Geo; and 

ISMAEL E. CRUZ-RAMOS, a/k/a Chapu, 

Defendants, Appellants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court issued on August 26, 2015 is 

amended as follows: 

On page 6, line 13, change "LA" to "La". 

On page 54, lines 6-7, remove "740 vials of crack,". 

Case: 13-2291 Document: 00116882832 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2015 Entry ID: 5934003
No. 15,253.

#### The State *v.*Buntin.

Cbimimal *Law.*— Indictment.—Insufficiency *of.*— In the absence of the endorsement “A true bill ” upon the back of an indictment, although the name of the foreman of the grand jury is endorsed thereon, the indictment is bad, and may be taken advantage of by a motion to quash.

From the Boone Circuit Court.

*L. T. Michener,*Attorney General, and *C. M. Zion,*Prosecuting Attorney, for the State.

*T. J. Terhune,*for appellee.

Berkshire, J.

This is an appeal by the State. The court below quashed the indictment. The appellee files no brief. We learn from the appellant’s counsel that the indictment was quashed because of the absence of the words “A true bill,” on the back of the indictment. Upon an examination of the record, we learn that the foreman of the grand jury endorsed his name upon the back of the indictment, but nowhere do the words *“A*true bill ” appear.

The statute, section 1669, requires that the prosecuting .attorney sign the indictment, and that it be endorsed *“A*true bill,” and the foreman’s name subscribed thereon. This statute is imperative.

*125Filed April 4, 1890.

Section 1670 provides that as soon as the indictment has been returned into court, it shall be the duty of the judge to examine it, and if the foreman has neglected to endorse it “A true bill,” with his name signed thereto, that the court must cause the foreman to so endorse it.

In the absence of the endorsement, which the statute imperatively requires, the indictment is bad, and, as it is an infirmity which appears on' the face of the record, may be taken advantage of by a motion to quash. The court committed no error in quashing the indictment. *Johnson*v. *State,*23 Ind. 32; *Heacock*v. *State,*42 Ind. 393; *Cooper*v. *State,*79 Ind. 206; *State*v. *Bowman,*103 Ind. 69; Gillett Crim. Law, section 116. *We*do not regard *Beard*v. *State,*57 Ind. 8, to the contrary. In that case the indictment was returned to the Posey Circuit Court, and on change of venue the case was transferred to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court. The transcript as made and forwarded by the clerk of the Posey Circuit Court failed to show the proper endorsement on the indictment, but the court held that the original indictment was a part of the record, and as it appeared to be properly endorsed the court properly overruled the motion to quash. In passing upon the question the judge who wrote the opinion incidentally remarked that the defect in the transcript could not be reached by a motion to quash the indictment.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
- Home
- Space Flight Awareness
- Expedition 10-19

- Poster Home
- Exp 60-69
- Exp 50-59
- Exp 40-49
- Exp 30-39
- Exp 20-29
- Exp 10-19
- Exp 1-9
- Internal   - Artemis Posters
  - Historic Poster
  - ISS 20th Anniversary
  - ISS 20th Lithograph
- More   - Commercial Crew    Expedition 10-19 Posters    **Exp 19 Poster**hi res    **Exp 19 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 18 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 18 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 17 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 17 Fact Sheet**front & back    **Exp 16 Poster**Exp 16 Themed Poster    **Exp 16 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 15 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 15 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 15 On Board**Gate Banner    **Exp 14 Poster HQCMR**hi res / lo res    **Exp 14 Poster Reiter**hi res / low res    **Exp 14 Banner**hi res / lo res    **Exp 14 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 13 Poster**hi res / lo res         **Exp 13 Banner**hi res / lo res    **Exp 13 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 12 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 12 Banner**hi res / lo res    **Exp 12 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 11 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 11 Fact Sheet**front / back    **Exp 11 Banner**hi res / lo res    **Exp 10 Poster**hi res / lo res    **Exp 10 Fact Sheet**pdf    **Exp 10 Banner**hi res / lo res    SFA Poster Homepage      The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 03, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Darith Yim								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GERARDO ESPARZA-MORENO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-1527

(D.C. No. 1:09-CR-00197-DME-1) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1527 Document: 01018391281 Date Filed: 03/25/2010 Page: 1