alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 05/75-0257]

Notice is hereby given that Cardinal Growth, L.P., 311 South Wacker Driver, Suite 5500, Chicago, IL 60606, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Cardinal Growth, L.P. provided financing to GreenRock Environmental Management, Inc., 1400 West Carroll Avenue, Chicago, IL 60607. The financing was used to purchase office and computer related equipment for the small business.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because the CEO of GreenRock Environmental Management, Inc. assumed financial responsibilities at Cardinal Growth, L.P. within 6 months of the financing. According to the definition of Associate in § 107.50, Section 10 if an Associate relationship exists at any time within 6 months before or after the date of a Financing, then the Associate relationship is considered to exist on the date of the Financing.

Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: January 6, 2010.

Sean Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-2717 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Document

Exhibit 10.10

*Certain information where indicated below in brackets has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed*


AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO 
PRODUCT SCHEDULE




        This Amendment is made effective as of the last date indicated on the signature page hereto, by and between Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (“CSI”) and Fresenius Kabi AB (“FRESENIUS”).


        WHEREAS, CSI and FRESENIUS entered into a Supply Agreement dated as of April 4, 2011and a related Product Schedule (the “Product Schedule”); and


        WHEREAS, CSI and FRESENIUS entered into an Amendment No.1 to the Product Schedule effective March 17th, 2016 (the “First Amendment”); and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain terms of the Product Schedule.


        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:




1.Section 1 Part C of the Product Schedule, as amended by the First Amendment, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:  


“1. Price




Price for 2020: $ [******]
						
	Units purchased / year	Price [USD] per container
	≥ [******] units	$ [******]
	≥ [******] units	$ [******]
	≥ [******] units	$ [******]


•Price FCA (Incoterms 2010)
•100% optical control
•Batch size = 15,500 containers
•Raw materials and packaging materials prices given by FRESENIUS standard suppliers.
•Product related registration fees (e.g., according to 21 CFR 820) are not included and have to be borne by CSI.”










2.Sections 3 and 4 of Part C of the Product Schedule are hereby deleted in whole and replaced with the following:“3. First Price Review Date and Annual Price ReviewThe First Price Review Date shall be the 1st of October 2020 and subsequent Price review dates are 1st of October for each following year (“Annual Price Review Date”) for Prices that shall be effective as of the 1st of January of each following year”.
3. Except as set forth herein, all provisions of the Product Schedule will remain in full force and effect without modification.  






        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the dates indicated below.


          
            CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. 




            By: /s/ John Hastings   18 Mar 2020
            Name: John Hastings     Title: VP, Mfg & Operations








            FRESENIUS KABI AB 




            By: /s/ Bettina Krausenbaum  2020-03-04
            Name: Bettina Krausenbaum     Title: Managing Director


By: /s/ Therese Schäfers  2020-03-04
Name: Therese SchäfersTitle:  CFO
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See **

28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD THOMAS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

J. LAWRENCE WRIGHT; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-17212

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00855-CMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Craig M. Kellison, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 15, 2011*** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Edward Thomas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust

FILED

FEB 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-17212

administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

district court’s application of substantive law, and for clear error its factual

determinations, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003), and we

affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by deciding disputed issues of fact in

favor of defendants and finding that Thomas was not prevented from filing

grievances. See id. at 1119-20 (“In deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to

exhaust nonjudicial remedies, the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide

disputed issues of fact.”). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed the

action because Thomas failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing

suit. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper

exhaustion” under § 1997e(a) is mandatory and requires adherence to

administrative procedural rules). 

AFFIRMED.
Order entered February 3, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00637-CV

ROBERT M. MOORE AND REBECCA MOORE, Appellants

V.

THE BRIDGES ON TRAVIS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-2-072CV

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ February 2, 2021 third motion for extension 

of time to file their corrected brief. We GRANT the requested ten-day extension 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 8, 2021. We caution 

appellants that failure to file the brief may result in dismissal of the appeal without 

further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
2 min read

# NASA’s Honey Astrobee Robot Returns to Space

### Arezu Sarvestani

#### Public Affairs Officer

Oct 05, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Editor’s Note: This article was updated October 10, 2023, to correct the date when the Honey Astrobee returned to Earth, which was on September 30, 2021.**

The International Space Station is abuzz with the return of one of NASA’s Astrobee smart robots. The yellow Honey Astrobee, one of three free-flying robots, was unboxed in space after spending nearly two years at its home base, NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley. Honey had returned to Earth in September 2021 for maintenance and repairs.

NASA astronaut Woody Hoburg helped unpack Honey from its flight container and verified the robot was ready to get back to work. After initial checks, Honey was able to independently disengage from its docking station, maneuver through the space station’s Japanese Experiment Module (JEM), and re-dock successfully without crew supervision. 

The Astrobee Facility provides the orbiting laboratory with a robotic system for research and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) outreach. Astrobee consists of three cubed-shaped robots, software, and a docking station used for recharging. The robots, which use electric fans as propulsion in the microgravity of the space station, aim to help manage routine spacecraft tasks so that astronauts can focus on jobs that only humans can perform. The project provides payload opportunities as well as guidance to users from academia, private industry, NASA, and other government agencies in the execution of approved research and STEM objectives.

*Astrobee was funded by NASA’s Game Changing Development Program, part of the Space Technology Mission Directorate. Ongoing funding is provided by NASA’s International Space Station Utilization Office.*
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                      TO

                           CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                      OF

                           HUNTSMAN ICI HOLDINGS LLC

                       Pursuant to Section 18-202 of the
                    Delaware Limited Liability Company Act


     1.   The name of the limited liability company is Huntsman ICI Holdings LLC
(the "Company").
      -------

     2.   The Certificate of Formation is hereby amended to change the name of
the Company to Huntsman International Holdings LLC.

     3.   Accordingly, Article 1 of the Certificate of Formation shall, as
amended, read as follows:

            "1.  The name of the limited liability company is Huntsman
            International Holdings LLC."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned authorized person has executed this
Certificate of Amendment this 7/th/ day of December 2000.

                                        HUNTSMAN ICI HOLDINGS LLC

                                        By:   \s\ Samuel D. Scruggs
                                           ---------------------------------
                                        Name: Samuel D. Scruggs
                                        Its:  Authorized Person
Use parenthesis( ), AND, OR to combine search terms to describe specific criteria.

To find exact matches, surround words or phrases with quotation marks.

Need Help? Contact Us.

Frequently Asked Reports & Data    ▼         - All Experiments Report
        - All Facilities Report
        - All Publications Report

Category

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

Subcategory under construction

PartnerExpedition(s)

              - 0
              - 1
              - 2
              - 3
              - 4
              - 5
              - 6
              - 7
              - 8
              - 9
              - 10
              - 11
              - 12
              - 13
              - 14
              - 15
              - 16
              - 17
              - 18
              - 19/20
              - 21/22
              - 22/23
              - 23/24

NASA Sponsoring OrgsPublication CitationsFacility Availability

Hide citationCopy citation

----

----

						Help/Suggestions
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Colorado  Community  Broadcasting,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  April 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report").  I, Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Rao Mankal, CFO

Dated:  November 19, 2004
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LOIS SANDERS AND DONALD SANDERS.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification granted. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*599)
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 
Cash Compensation Plan for Directors


Directors who are not employees of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), are paid an annual retainer of $75,000. Additional annual retainers are paid to any non-employee Chairman of the Board ($130,000); the Lead Independent Director, if one has been appointed ($50,000); the Chairman of the Audit Committee ($30,000); the Chairman of the Compensation Committee ($20,000); and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee ($15,000). Additional annual retainers are also paid to directors who serve on committees in roles other than as Chairman as follows: Audit Committee ($15,000); Compensation Committee ($10,000); and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ($7,500). All retainers are paid in quarterly installments. In addition, the Compensation Committee retains discretion to recommend to the full Board of Directors that additional cash payments be made to a non-employee director(s) for extraordinary service during a fiscal year.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH A. ELLSWORTH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

DIANE BALKIN; ADRIENNE

GREENE; JAMES WUNDERLICK;

KATHY WILSON; DON HOLLOWAY;

JENNIFER NUANES; JEFF CARSON;

R. BACON; W. HOLENCIK; PAT

MONTEZ; CHARLES OLIN; A.

ZAVARAS; HARVEY LAPPIN;

CATHIE HOIST; MARSHALL

GRIFFITH; C/M QUETEAH; PAULA

FRANTZ; BURL McCULLAR,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-1520

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02265-WYD-BNB)

(D. Colorado)

ORDER

Before KELLY, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

This appeal is before the court based on a show cause order challenging appellate

jurisdiction and directing the parties to obtain a district court order either granting

certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) as to the November 4, 2009 Order appealed by

Plaintiff Ellsworth or explicitly adjudicating the unresolved portions of Claims Three and

Four. See Stockman's Water Company, LLC v. Vaca Partners, L.P., 425 F.3d 1263, 1265

Appellate Case: 09-1520 Document: 01018385174 Date Filed: 03/16/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

(10th Cir. 2005); Lewis v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 850 F.2d 641, 645-46 (10th Cir. 1988).

This court lacks jurisdiction. The parties failed to move in the district court for a

Rule 54(b) certification. No final judgment has been entered in Plaintiff’s civil rights

action. Consequently, the November 4, 2009 Order, which left unresolved portions of

Claims Three and Four, id. at 6, is interlocutory and not immediately appealable under 28

U.S.C. § 1291 or under any recognized exception to the final judgment rule. 

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1520 Document: 01018385174 Date Filed: 03/16/2010 Page: 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANTTO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofSoutheastern Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Paul Dickman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 15, 2018

 

/s/ Paul Dickman                                     

Paul Dickman,

Chief Executive Officer, Principal ExecutiveOfficer

 

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary financial information extracted from the March
31,  2000  Form  10-Q  and  is  qualified  in  its entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       33288
<SECURITIES>                               4388663
<RECEIVABLES>                                47555
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4343
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1635
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4466798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4173304
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  65805
<COMMON>                                       220
<OTHER-SE>                                  227469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4466798
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             72654
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               331
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           63337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               7513
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           7513
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  7513
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .27


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Howard W. Robin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|



|Date: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Howard W. Robin                                  
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | Howard W. Robin President and Chief Executive Officer