66794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 

0172. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA). 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title of Collection: Student Data 

Form. 

Form Number: OSHA Form 182. 

OMB Control Number: 1218–0172. 

Affected Public: Individuals; business 

or other for-profit organizations; Federal 

government; State, Local, or Tribal 

governments. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 2000. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 2000. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 160. 

Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden: 

$0. 

Dated: October 14, 2010. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27378 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,722] 

Sojitz Corporation of America, a 

Subsidiary of Sojitz Corporation, 

Forest Products Department, Seattle, 

WA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated September 23, 

2010, by a Washington State workforce 

official requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of Sojitz 

Corporation of America, a subsidiary of 

Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products 

Department, Seattle, Washington 

(subject firm). The determination was 

issued on September 1, 2010. The 

Department’s Notice of Determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517). 

The workers provide services related to 

the trade of forest products. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that the subject firm did 

not, during the period under 

investigation, shift to a foreign country 

the supply of services like or directly 

competitive with the services performed 

by the workers or acquire these services 

from a foreign country; that the workers’ 

separation, or threat of separation, was 

not related to any increase in imports of 

like or directly competitive services; 

and that the workers did not produce an 

article or supply a service that was 

directly used in the production of an 

article or the supply of service by a firm 

that employed a worker group that is 

eligible to apply for TAA based on the 

aforementioned article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners alleged that the subject firm 

has shifted services to a foreign country. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the petitioning workers 

meet the eligibility requirements of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27388 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,572; TA–W–71,572A; TA–W– 

71,572B; TA–W–71,572C] 

Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration: TA–W–71,572, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Martins Ferry, OH; TA–W–71,572A, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Yorkville, OH; TA–W–71,572B, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., Mingo 

Junction, OH; TA–W–71,572C, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Steubenville, OH 

By applications dated May 15 and 

May 21, 2010, United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union (USW), 

requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on March 

3, 2010, and the Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21363). 

The subject workers produce 

galvanized coil (TA–W–71,572), cold 

rolled coils and back plate coils (TA– 

W–71,572A), hot rolled coils (TA–W– 

71,572B), and cold rolled coils (TA–W– 

71,572C). 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that there was no 

increase in imports of like or directly 

competitive articles produced at subject 

facilities and no shift to/acquisition 

from a foreign country by the subject 

firm of like or directly competitive 

articles produced at the subject 

facilities. 

The investigation also revealed that 

the firm did not produce an article or 

supply a service that was used by a firm 

with TAA-certified workers in the 

production of an article or supply of a 

service that was the basis for TAA 

certification. 

The Department of Labor has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 66795 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27381 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,729] 

International Paper, Pineville Mill, 

Industrial Packaging Group, Pineville, 

LA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated November 2, 

2009, the company official from the 

subject firm requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on 

August 20, 2010 and the Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on September 3, 2010 

(75 FR 54187). 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

findings that neither the subject firm nor 

any of its customers imported articles 

like or directly competitive with 

uncoated freesheet containerboard 

produced by the subject firm nor did the 

subject firm shift production to a foreign 

country or acquire from another country 

articles like or directly competitive with 

the uncoated freesheet containerboard 

produced at the subject firm. The initial 

investigation also revealed that the 

subject firm did not produce a 

component part that was used by a firm 

that employed a worker group that is 

currently eligible to apply for TAA and 

that directly incorporated the 

containerboard in the production of the 

article that was the basis for the TAA 

certification. 

In request for reconsideration, the 

subject firm provided new information 

in regard to the product produced by the 

subject firm. 

The Department of Labor has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27383 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,479] 

Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, 

Distribution Center, Edison, NJ; Notice 

of Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

By application dated October 5, 2010, 

by an Illinois State workforce official 

requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of Enesco, LLC, 

Gund Division, Distribution Center, 

Edison, New Jersey (subject firm). The 

determination was issued on August 27, 

2010. The Department’s Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on September 15, 2010 

(75 FR 56144). The workers are engaged 

in activities related to the supply of 

packaging and distribution services 

related to giftware products. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that the subject firm did 

not, during the period under 

investigation, shift to a foreign country 

the supply of services like or directly 

competitive with the services performed 

by the workers or acquire these services 

from a foreign country; that the workers’ 

separation, or threat of separation, was 

not related to any increase in imports of 

like or directly competitive services; 

and that the workers did not produce an 

article or supply a service that was 

directly used in the production of an 

article or the supply of service by a firm 

that employed a worker group that is 

eligible to apply for TAA based on the 

aforementioned article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner stated that the petition was 

filed on behalf of a worker who worked 

within a separate department at a 

separate location and that the services 

performed by the aforementioned 

department and location have shifted to 

a foreign country. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the petitioning workers 

meet the eligibility requirements of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27385 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–64,993] 

TTM Technologies, Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From Kelly Services, 

Aerotek, and an On-Site Leased 

Worker From Orbotech, Inc., Redmond, 

WA; Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on January 23, 2008, 

applicable to workers of TTM 

Technologies, Redmond, Washington. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on March 25, 2009 (74 FR 

12901). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of printed circuit boards. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES