alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.3**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard P. Story, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: May 7, 2004 By:  /s/ Richard P. Story    Richard P. Story    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(authorized officer of registrant)
#### Lefavour *v.*Justice.—In error.

*Tuesday, July*28.

THE Court, on overruling a demurrer to a bill in chancery, should give the defendant a reasonable time, if he request it, to answer the bill. *Kipper et al.*v. *Glancey et al.,*2 Blackf. 356.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000892020
<NAME> VIDEOLABS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,458,786
<SECURITIES>                                   305,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  760,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,591
<INVENTORY>                                  1,330,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,880,822
<PP&E>                                         627,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                 404,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,128,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,315,466
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,349
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,128,372
<SALES>                                      2,038,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,038,222
<CGS>                                        1,155,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  675,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                240,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   240,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,957
<SECURITIES>                                    30,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,536
<INVENTORY>                                      1,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,610
<PP&E>                                          54,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,840
<BONDS>                                          1,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,933
<SALES>                                         53,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,261
<CGS>                                            9,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                       436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,470
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
#### James M. DEBARDELEBEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert A. HOOD, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6906.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

*273James M. DeBardeleben, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James M. Debardeleben seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as barred by the statute of limitations. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Debardeleben has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 4.11


Letter of Support


 


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DAQO NEW ENERGY
CORP.


 


We, as major shareholders, acknowledge
the net current liability position of Daqo New Energy Corp. as of December 31, 2019 and agree to provide necessary financial support
to Daqo New Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries through Daqo Group Co., Ltd..(“Daqo Group”), another company wholly owned
by the shareholders of us and a related party of Daqo New Energy Corp., which has sufficient capital and access to resources and
hence the ability do so.


 


The details of our agreed financial support
to Daqo New Energy Corp. include the following:


 


		1.	We agree that Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us the amount of USD 20.1M owed as of
December 31, 2019 to Daqo Group and Daqo New Material Co., Ltd. before May 1, 2021.



 


		2.	In addition, we agree to provide Daqo New Energy Corp. additional financial funding to support
the Company’s operation between January 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us this
amount before May 1, 2021.



 


		3.	In addition, the management of Daqo New Energy Corp. should immediately suspend the capacity expansion
project in its Xinjiang facilities if they don’t have sufficient financial resources to continue the project after repaying
all other financial obligations.



 


We agree to provide funding
to support the Company to repay all the financial obligations already committed related to the capacity expansion project in its
Xinjiang facilities. Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us this amount before May 1, 2021.


 


	Investor name: 	MILLION FORTUNE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Wanlin Gao	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	BEST MOUNT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
	Signature:	/s/ Jianrong Tang	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	ACE PRO HOLDINGS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Bin Cai	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020 	 


 


	Investor name: 	INSTANTUP INVESTMENTS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Dafeng Shi	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 



     


     


    

 


	Investor name: 	GOLD INTELLECT LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Guangfu Xu	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	PLENTY CHINA LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Xiang Xu	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	RUIAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ authorized signatory	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	LUCKY PROSPER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Dafeng Shi	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	JIA XIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Bin Cai	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	DUKE ELITE LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Xiang Xu	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020	 


 


	Investor name: 	DAQO GROUP CO., LTD.
	Signature:	/s/ Guangfu Xu	 
	Date:	February 25, 2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Andre M. Hilliou, Chief Executive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 19, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    ANDRE M. HILLIOU
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Andre M. Hilliou       
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, James Meier, Chief Financial Officer of Full House Resorts,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 19, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES MEIER
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | James Meier            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| CarpenterCooperGlennGrissomSchirraShepardSlayton | **Biographies** |

###   

###
#### Richard Herman GODWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WINNFIELD, et al., Defendants, Gleason Nugent; Deano Thornton, Mayor; Gordon Powell; J.R. Branch; Phillip Anderson; Bill Barber, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-31261

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 28, 2003.

*385Richard Herman Godwin, Louisiana Department of Public Safety *&*Corrections, St. Gabriel, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Randall Brian Reiser, Reiser, Auzenne *&*Boudreaux, Alexandria, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BARRSDALE, EMILO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Richard Herman Godwin, Louisiana inmate number 444397, appeals the district court’s grant of the appellees’ motion for summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights suit, which was filed to challenge events that occurred while God-win was a pretrial detainee. Godwin argued in the district court that the defendants denied him medical care, failed to protect him from harm suffered at the hands of other inmates, and interfered with his right of access to courts by opening his mail and confiscating his legal materials. Godwin now argues that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because he submitted an affidavit that raises genuine issues of material fact.

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. *Duckett v. City of Cedar Park, Tex.,*950 F.2d 272, 276 (5th Cir.1992). Summary judgment is proper when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” *Amburgey v. Corhart Refractories Corp., Inc.,*936 F.2d 805, 809 (5th Cir.1991); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). The affidavit on which Godwin relies is insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact with respect to Godwin’s claims. Accordingly, Godwin has not shown that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Godwin also lists several other issues in the statement of issues in his opening brief, including challenges to the district court’s denial of his discovery motion and motion for the appointment of counsel. However, Godwin has not addressed these issues in his opening brief. Accordingly, we will not address these issues. *See Grant v. Cuellar,*59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir.1995); *United Paperworkers Int’l Union v. Champion Int’l Corp.,*908 F.2d 1252, 1255 (5th Cir.1990).

Godwin has shown no error in the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, that judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
exhibit04_3.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  



Exhibit 4.3


 


English Language Summary


 


Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2020, between Banco do Nordeste do Brasil S.A., as lender, and TIM S.A., as borrower.


 


On January 31, 2020, TIM S.A. entered into a credit agreement, or the Credit Agreement, with an aggregate principal amount of R$752.5 million with Banco do Nordeste do Brasil S.A., or BNB to be disbursed in tranches. This credit agreement will be monetarily adjusted by the IPCA rate with one portion (R$325.1 million) bearing interest at 1.4386% and the remaining portion (R$427.4 million) bearing interest at 1.7582%. There is a 15% compliance bonus reduction of the interest rates percentages in case of compliance with certain covenants.


In addition to other standard sections, certain conditions precedent as set forth in the Credit Agreement must be met for the funds to be released, including the execution of bank surety letters in favor of BNB and compliance with contractual obligations under FINAME agreements. 


The Credit Agreement shall be repaid in monthly installments, being the first one due on March 15, 2023 and the last one due on February 15, 2028.


In order to guarantee the obligations assumed under the Credit Agreement, TIM S.A. pledges certain telecommunications services receivables in a monthly amount equivalent to at least 5% of the amount under the Credit Agreement.


The funds borrowed under the Credit Agreement must be used exclusively for the project presented to BNB, which includes construction and engineering, assembly and installation of new machines, equipment, industrial systems, components and software updates as well as related computer goods manufactured in Brazil and abroad, accredited by the FINAME.


The Credit Agreement contains standard positive and negative covenants.  For example, TIM S.A. undertakes to abide by all ANATEL regulation that may delay the project being financed by BNB, affect the quality of the services being rendered or TIM S.A.’s ability to pay BNB.


Among others, any of the following would constitute an event of default during the term of the Credit Agreement, for which BNB may require acceleration of the maturity date and repayment: (i) certain negative covenants are not complied with; (ii) there is a final, non-appealable judgment against TIM in connection with slave or child labor or crimes against the environment; (iii) there is a change of control of TIM or other corporate reorganization without BNB’s prior consent or notice within 30 days; (iv) certain obligations set forth in the Credit Agreement are not complied with; or (v) TIM S.A. uses the funds for purposes other than those set forth in the Credit Agreement.


 




1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GLENDORA E. BODINE.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             518,577
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      360,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (25,148)
<INVENTORY>                                         44,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,002,643
<PP&E>                                             720,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (415,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,329,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              660,102
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            49,956
<OTHER-SE>                                         616,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,329,172
<SALES>                                          1,278,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,278,545
<CGS>                                              795,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      795,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,060,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (1,595)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (590,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (590,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (590,126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.12)
        

</TABLE>