alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
      BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                    /s/Gary Mentesana
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Gary Mentesana
                                    Principal Executive Officer and
                                    Principal Financial Officer
                                    Arch Street VIII, Inc. as
                                    Managing General Partner of
                                    Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII,
                                    A Limited Partnership


                                   Date:  November 14, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBISIDIARIES**

 

Listed below are our subsidiaries, our percentage ownership in each subsidiary and the total number of active subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by each subsidiary as of September 30, 2009.

 

|                                             |   | % Ownership |   | U.S.   |   | Non-U.S. |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------|--------|--------|--------|----------|
|                                             |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Caspian Services Group Limited, BVI              |   | 100%        |   | 0      |   | 1        |
| Caspian Services Group LLP, Kazakhstan(1)        |   |        |   |   |   |     |
|                                             |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Caspian Geophysics Ltd., BVI                     |   | 100%        |   | 0      |   | 3        |
| Tat-Arka LLP, Kazakhstan(2)                      |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Kazmorgeophysica JSC, Kazakhstan(3)              |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Veritas-Caspian LLP, Kazakhstan(4)               |   |        |   |   |   |     |
|                                             |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Caspian Real Estate Ltd., BVI                    |   | 100%        |   | 0      |   | 4        |
| Bauta JSC, Kazakhstan(5)                         |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Balykshi LLP, Kazakhstan(6)                      |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Mangistau Oblast Boat Yard LLP, 

Kazakhstan (7) |   |        |   |   |   |     |
|                                             |   |        |   |   |   |     |

(1)  Caspian Services Group Limited owns a 100% interest in Caspian Services Group LLP.

(2)  Caspian Geophysics Ltd. owns a 100% equity interest in Tat-Arka LLP.

(3)  Caspian Geophysics Ltd. owns an 80% equity interest in Kazmorgeophysica JSC.  

(4)  Kazmorgeophysica JSC owns a 50% equity interest in Veritas-Caspian LLP.

(5) Caspian Real Estate Ltd. owns a 56% equity interest in Bauta JSCI.

(6) Caspian Real Estate Ltd. owns a 78% equity interest in Balykshi LLP.

(7) Balykshi LLP owns a 20% equity interest in Mangistau Oblast Boat Yard LLP.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 363 

Supporting a Federal, publically funded universal school meal and nutrition 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2017 

Mr. NOLAN (for himself, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. WALZ, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. LEE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, and Mr. EVANS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting a Federal, publically funded universal school meal 

and nutrition program. 

Whereas school nutrition programs help end childhood hunger and provide access to healthy, nutritious meals; 

Whereas access to school meals has been shown to improve 

educational outcomes; 

Whereas the United States Department of Agriculture’s Community Eligibility Provision was established to provide 

greater access to school meals throughout the Nation; 

Whereas the expansion of the Community Eligibility Provision to all schools would increase the availability of school 

meals for students and reduce childhood hunger; 


lotter on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 363 IH 

Whereas the Community Eligibility Provision also eliminates 

any stigma that accompanies free or reduced meals and 

students unable to purchase meals due to insufficient account funds; and 

Whereas expansion of the Community Eligibility Provision 

would further allow schools to shift resources from paperwork to providing high quality meals: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 a Federal, publically funded universal school meal and nu3 trition program. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=982
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7818

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DANNY RAY WELLINGTON, a/k/a D-Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-185, CA-97-305-1)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Ray Wellington, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Wellington, Nos. CR-94-185; CA-97-305-1 (M.D.N.C.

Nov. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Activity Three: Print a Lunar Habitat

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8

## Subject

Life Science, Space Science, Living and Working in Space, Solar System and Planets, Missions to Planets and Moons, Planetary Geology, Earth's Moon

## Type

Lesson Plans / Activities

Students will design and construct a model lunar habitat using an additive manufacturing process with simulated lunar concrete.

Students will use the engineering design process to
              - Explore the utilization of in-situ resources for supporting sustainable lunar surface exploration
              - Design and construct a model of a lunar habitat using 3D printing techniques
              - Test the structural stability of their designs and improve if necessary

Next Generation Science Standards: MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-4

Activity Three: Print a Lunar Habitat

This lesson plan is part of the Lunar Surface Exploration educator guide.
# Sitemap

## September 26, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 09
- September 26, 2016

            - NASA’s Weekly Video Clips from Space Feature Typhoon Malakas, Grace Potter Music Video
            - NASA’s Asteroid-Bound Spacecraft Aces Instrument Check
            - NASA’s Hubble Spots Possible Water Plumes Erupting on Jupiter’s Moon Europa
            - Tectonically Active Planet Mercury
            - GOES-R Satellite Processing
            - Hidden Wonders
            - NASA’s Hubble Spots Possible Water Plumes Erupting on Jupiter’s Moon Europa
            - Titan Flyby 123 (T-123): Sep. 27, 2016
            - Sol 1473: In search of a contact science location
# Alan B. Shepard, Jr.

On May 5, 1961, in the Freedom 7 spacecraft, he was launched by a Redstone vehicle on a ballistic trajectory suborbital flight—a flight which carried him to an altitude of 116 statute miles and to a landing point 302 statute miles down the Atlantic Missile Range.

### Quick Facts

Shepard holds the distinction of being the first American to journey into space.

Shepard made his second space flight as spacecraft commander on Apollo 14, January 31 – February 9, 1971.

Shepard has logged a total of 216 hours and 57 minutes in space, of which 9 hours and 17 minutes were spent in lunar surface EVA.

Shepard has been awarded two NASA Distinguished Service Medals.

### Biography

## Alan B. Shepard, Jr.

Learn more about Astronaut Alan Shepard, including when he was selected by NASA to be an astronaut, his flight experience, education, background and more.  
                        Learn More about Alan B. Shepard, Jr.

## More About Alan Shepard

				More NASA News                			

Image Article1 Min Read
Celebrating Astronaut Alan Shepard’s 100th Birthday

Article8 Min Read
60 Years Ago: Alan Shepard Becomes the First American in Space

Article12 Min Read
50 Years Ago: Apollo 14 Launches to the Moon
Article4 Min Read
60 Years Ago: NASA Introduces Mercury 7 Astronauts

## Alan Shephard

33 Images

Go To Gallery

Go To Gallery

## The Mercury Seven

On October 7, 1958, shortly after NASA opened for business, it announced its first major undertaking, Project Mercury. The objectives were threefold: to place a human spacecraft into orbital flight around Earth, observe human performance in such conditions, and recover the human and the spacecraft safely. In January 1959, the committee received and screened 508 service records of a group of talented test pilots, of which seven were ultimately chosen.
				Learn More                                     about The Mercury Seven

## The Mercury Seven

M. Scott Carpenter
Mercury-Atlas 7 astronaut

L. Gordon Cooper
Mercury-Atlas 9 and Gemini V astronaut

John H. Glenn
Mercury-Atlas 6 and STS-95 astronaut

Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom
Mercury-Redstone 4, Gemini III and Apollo 1 astronaut

Walter M. Schirra
Mercury-Atlas 8, Gemini VI-A and Apollo 7 astronaut

Alan B. Shepard, Jr.
Mercury-Redstone 3 and Apollo 14 astronaut

Donald K. "Deke" Slayton
Apollo-Soyuz Test Project astronaut

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Astronauts Home

Humans In Space

The Apollo Program

Explore NASA’s History
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q OF
MUZAK CAPITAL CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001013763
<NAME> MUZAK CAPITAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27428]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0049]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction Questionnaire; EIB 10-
01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credit. The 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117) (``the 
Act''), enacted December 16, 2009, provides for Ex-Im Bank's FY2010 
budget authorization. As part of the U.S. government's efforts to 
strengthen sanctions against Iran, the Act contains language 
prohibiting Ex-Im Bank from:

    Authoriz[ing] any new guarantee, insurance, or extension of 
credit for any project controlled by an energy producer or refiner 
that continues to: (A) Provide Iran with significant refined 
petroleum resources; (B) materially contribute to Iran's capability 
to import refined petroleum resources; or (C) allow Iran to maintain 
or expand, in any material respect, its domestic production of 
refined petroleum resources, including any assistance in refinery 
construction, modernization, or repair.

See Sec. 7043 of the Act.
    The Act is effectively immediately and applies to all 
authorizations Ex-Im Bank may make with FY2010 funds.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 29, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Management & Budget, Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-0030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction 
Questionnaire; EIB 10-01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.
    OMB Number: 3048-0030.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This is a new collection to ensure compliance with 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), enacted 
December 16, 2009.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27428 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
# Activity Three: Model a Spacecraft Docking System

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8

## Subject

Engineering Design, History, Human Space Exploration, Mathematics, Physical Science, Technology, Measurement and Data Analysis, Forces and Motion, Models, Space Station, Space Vehicles

## Type

Lesson Plans / Activities

Students will work together as a team to construct and test a model of a target docking system and crew module.

Students will
              - Make metric length measurements with 0.1-cm accuracy.
              - Use given ratios to calculate dimensions of a scale model.
              - Demonstrate their knowledge of traveling through and rotating about the three axes of movement.
              - Demonstrate teamwork and communication skills to perform a task.

Next Generation Science Standards: MS-PS2-2, MS-PS2-2A

Common Core State Standards: 6.RP.A.1, 6.NS.B.3, 7.NS.A.3, 7.G.A.1

Activity Three: Model a Spacecraft Docking System

This lesson plan is part of the “Crew Transportation with Orion Educator Guide.”
# EXHIBIT 3.07

# CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT TO THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION

Martek  Biosciences  Corporation  (hereinafter  called the  "Corporation"),  organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware ("DGCL"), does hereby certify as follows:

FIRST:        The initial date of  incorporation  of the  Corporation  in the State of Delaware is May 13, 1985.  The name
under which the Corporation was originally organized was "Algatex, Inc."

SECOND:    The  Corporation's  Restated  Certificate of  Incorporation  was filed with and accepted by the Secretary of State on
December 1, 1993.

THIRD:        The Restated Certificate of Incorporation is amended by striking paragraph I of Article Fourth of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation in its entirety and inserting the following new paragraph I of Article Fourth as follows:

| | The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation has
authority to issue is 105,000,000 shares, having an aggregate par value of
$10,050,000 of which 100,000,000 shares of the par value of $0.10 per share
amounting in aggregate par value to $10,000,000 shall be Common Stock, and
5,000,000 shares of the par value of $0.01 per share amounting in aggregate par
value to $50,000 shall be Preferred Stock.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOURTH:    Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, the Corporation has duly adopted resolutions setting forth the above
referenced amendment at a meeting  of its Board of Directors held on January 24, 2002.

FIFTH:        At least a majority of the stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon duly approved said
proposed amendment at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Corporation held on March 14, 2002 in accordance with Sections
211, 222 and 242 of the DGCL.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its corporate seal to be affixed hereto and this Certificate of Amendment to
be signed by its Chief Executive Officer this  14th day of March, 2002.

| | MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION                        
| | ------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | By:  /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.
        Henry Linsert, Jr.
No. 87-1171.

#### Cody et al. *v.*Hillard et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 01, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 01, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A2318. JAYCEE ATLANTA DEVELOPEMENT, LLC et al. v. PROVIDENCE BANK.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





*On
      March 21, 2003, the Company terminated the employment of its four senior
      officers due to corporate mismanagement in the form of accounting irregularities
      and securities fraud during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2002 and 2001.
      At
      the time of their termination, all of these former officers were the subject
      of
      an investigation by the United States Department of Justice and three were
      subject to an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. On August
      19, 2003, as a result of the United States Department of Justice investigation,
      three of the former officers pled guilty to conspiring to inflate the revenue
      and earnings of the Company and for lying to investigators and the fourth former
      officer pled guilty to obstruction of justice. Also in August 19, 2003, the
      former officers who were under investigation by the Securities and Exchange
      Commission agreed to a consent decree with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission. As a result of the actions of the former officers of the Company,
      and due to the Company’s inability to adequately verify the results of the
      Company’s operations for the year ended October 31, 2002 because of incomplete
      or missing data, the Company was not able to prepare complete and accurate
      financial statements for the quarters ended January 31, 2002, April 30, 2002,
      July 31, 2002 and the year ended October 31, 2002, except for the balance sheet
      dated as of October 31, 2002 included in the Company’s annual report on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2002. Since the Company does not have
      complete and accurate financial statements for 2002, certain portions of this
      report do not contain the required comparison to the results of operations
      in
      2002. Consequently, the Company’s current Chief Financial Officer is unable to
      include the certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*