alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 301 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 301

  Expressing support for designation of May 30 as ``National Bartter 
                            Syndrome Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2017

  Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Joyce of Ohio) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of May 30 as ``National Bartter 
                            Syndrome Day''.

Whereas bartter syndrome is a rare kidney condition that causes an imbalance of 
        potassium, sodium, chloride, and other molecules in the body;
Whereas the antenatal form of bartter syndrome, which begins before birth, is 
        often life-threatening and is characterized by abnormally high levels of 
        amniotic fluid surrounding the affected fetus, premature delivery, and 
        salt loss;
Whereas the classical form of bartter syndrome, which begins in early childhood 
        and tends to be less severe, causes individuals to experience fatigue, 
        muscle weakness, growth delay, and developmental delay;
Whereas bartter syndrome likely affects approximately one per million people 
        worldwide, although the exact prevalence is unknown;
Whereas increased awareness and research of the bartter syndrome will promote 
        accurate and early recognition of the disorder and help families with 
        children suffering from this condition cope with the associated 
        difficulties; and
Whereas May 30 would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National Bartter 
        Syndrome Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``National Bartter Syndrome Day''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
11**
  **Nano-Proprietary,
Inc.**
  **Computation
of Income (Loss) Per Share**
  Three
      Months ended March 31,2005
    
    2004Computation
      of loss per common share:Net loss applicable to common  shares
    
    
    
    
    $(1,469,192)
    
    $(1,111,641)Weighted average number of common shares
    
    
    
    
    97,914,179
    
    94,961,000Net income (loss) per common share
    
    
    
    $(0.02)
    
    $(0.01)Computation
      of income ( loss ) per commonshare assuming full dilution**
 
  ** No
computation of diluted loss per common share is included for any period because
such computation results in an antidilutive loss per common
share.
EXHIBIT 10.34

PREFERRED ACCESS AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENTis made this 1st day of November, 2004, effective March 1, 2004, between MAGNA
INTERNATIONAL EUROPE AG, a stock corporation governed by the laws of Austria ("Magna") andFONTANA BETEILIGUNGS
AG,a stock corporation governed by the laws of Austria ("Fontana").

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THATin consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows:

---



The
term of this agreement shall be deemed to have commenced on March 1, 2004 and shall terminate at 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2014.

Magna
covenants and agrees to pay to Fontana the following fees and other charges at the time or times hereinafter provided:

Restaurant,
pro shop and other goods and services shall be billed monthly by Fontana to Magna at Fontana's regular rates, without any discount or surcharge. All amounts due from Magna to
Fontana hereunder, other than the Annual Fee, shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date of any invoice delivered by Fontana to Magna.

In
connection with any corporate or employee tournament or other event held by Magna at Fontana Sports, Fontana shall furnish to Magna, without charge, the services customarily provided
by operators of comparable facilities for such events, but expressly excluding food and beverage services and pro shop purchases, which shall be billed at Fontana's regular rates for such goods and
services.

2

---



3

---





If,
during the term of this agreement, Fontana proposes to sell Fontana Sports as a whole, or to sell the clubhouse and/or golf course separately, to an arm's length third party:

4

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have duly executed this agreement as of the date first written above.

| |  | FONTANA BETEILIGUNGS AG      
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | By:                          
| |  |                              
| |  | By:                          
| |  |                              
| |  | MAGNA INTERNATIONAL EUROPE AG
| |  | By:                          
| |  |                              
| |  | By:                          
| |  |                              
| |  | By:                          
| |  |                              

5

---



QuickLinks
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50596

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesus Sierra-Rodriguez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-1178-1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus SierraRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sierra-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 19, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50596 Document: 00516100618 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2021
No. 21-50596

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 21-50596 Document: 00516100618 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2021
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Russell C. Mix, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 of Spectre Gaming, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 15, 2004 /s/ Russell C. Mix   By: Russell C. Mix President and Chief Executive Officer
26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<S>                           <C>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        1,337,549
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 1,857,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     15,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      84,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              2,270,134
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               16,613,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,201,250
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                          70
<COMMON>                                                          1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                                    9,141,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 16,613,929
<SALES>                                                       1,669,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              1,669,160
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 1,509,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              176,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  28,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     46,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (17,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (17,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JACQUELINE LEADEM (JOSEPH T. LEADEM, DECEASED) FOR BENEFITS UNDER THE SECOND INJURY FUND v. SECOND INJURY FUND.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
`



# United **States Court**  **of Appeals** 

**for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 2 0

- 40359

**Priscilla Villarreal**

**,**

Plaintiff

— Appell ant

,

versus

**The City of Laredo, Texas; Webb County, Texas; Isidro R.**

**Alaniz; Marisela Jacaman; Claudio Trevino, Jr.; Juan L.**

**Ruiz; Deyanria Villarreal; Enedina Martinez; Alfredo**

**Guerrero; Laura M o**  **ntemayor; Does 1**

**- 2** 

**,**

Defendant s

— Appell ees.

Appeal from the United Sta tes District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5 : 19

- C V

- 48

**ON PETITION**  **S FOR**  **REHEARING EN**  **B ANC** 

**AND PETITION FOR REHEARING**

(Opinion November 1

, 202 1

, **5 Cir.,**  **202 1** 

**, 17**  **F.4** th **532,** withdrawn )

(Opinion August 12, 2022, **5 Cir.,**  **202 2** 

**, 44**  **F.4** th **363** )

Before **Richman,** Chief Judge

**,** and **Jones, Smith, Stewart,**

**Dennis, Elrod,**  **Southwick, Haynes,**  **Graves, Higginson,** 

**Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham,** and **Wilson,**

Circuit Judges

**.** United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

October 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

ClerkNo. 2 0

- 40359

**Per Curiam:** 

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition s for

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service

and not disqualified having voted in favor,

**IT IS ORDERED** that this cause shall be reheard by the court en

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify

a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th

Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case da ted August 12

, 2022

, is

VACATED.

**IT IS FURTHER ORDERED** that the petition for rehearing filed

September 9, 2022, is DENIED AS MOOT

.

2
2 min read

# NASA Conducts Full-Duration Artemis Moon Rocket Engine Test

### NASA Stennis Communications

Mar 22, 2024

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA continued a key RS-25 engine test series for future Artemis flights of the agency’s powerful SLS (Space Launch System) rocket March 22 with a hot fire on the Fred Haise Test Stand at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It marked the 10th hot fire in a 12-test series to certify production of new RS-25 engines by lead contractor Aerojet Rocketdyne, an L3 Harris Technologies company. The NASA Stennis test team fired the certification engine for 500 seconds, or the same amount of time engines must fire to help launch the SLS rocket to space with astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft. Operators powered the engine up to a level of 113%, which is beyond the 111% power level new RS-25 engines use to provide additional thrust. Testing up to the 113% power level provides a margin of operational safety. Newly produced engines will power NASA’s SLS rocket on Artemis missions to the Moon and beyond, beginning with Artemis V. For Artemis missions I-IV, NASA and Aerojet Rocketdyne modified 16 former space shuttle engines for use on the SLS rocket. Four RS-25 engines fire simultaneously to help launch each SLS rocket, producing up to 2 million pounds of combined thrust. Through Artemis, NASA will establish the foundation for long-term scientific exploration at the Moon, land the first woman, first person of color, and first international partner astronaut on the lunar surface, and prepare for human expeditions to Mars for the benefit of all. RS-25 tests at NASA Stennis are conducted by a diverse team of operators from NASA, Aerojet Rocketdyne, and Syncom Space Services, prime contractor for site facilities and operations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

J.C.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 476 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued022143F 2010
DTI Group Inc., 10913 NW. 30th Street, Suite 107, Miami, FL 33172
September 16, 2010.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-27207 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2314MN

_____________ Tandem Products, Inc., a Minnesota * corporation, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * New Hampshire Insurance Company, a * [UNPUBLISHED] Pennsylvania corporation, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: February 3, 1998

Filed: February 9, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Tandem Products, Inc. (Tandem) appeals from the adverse ruling of the district court in this diversity-based coverage dispute between Tandem and New Hampshire Insurance Company (New Hampshire). New Hampshire denied coverage for damages Tandem suffered from a defective heater provided by Lambert Industries, Inc., and the district court held the terms of New Hampshire's policy did not provide coverage for Tandem 's loss. Having reviewed the record and having considered de novo th e questions of state law, we conclude no error of law appears in the district court's-2-

judgment. We thus affirm the decision of the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No.
1 to Security Agreement (this “Amendment”) dated this 23rd day of April, 2020, by and among Bespoke Extracts, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and The Vantage Group Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS, the Holder,
as purchaser from the original holder of an original issue discount convertible debenture of the Company, dated December 24, 2019,
secured under a security agreement dated December 24, 2019 (the “Security Agreement”), and the Company are party to
the Security Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holder desire to amend the Security Agreement as more particularly set forth below;


 


WHEREFORE, the parties
do hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Section
1(a) of the Security Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:


 


(a) “Collateral”
means all of the Company’s right title and interest to the URLs set forth on Schedule A hereto.


 


2. Except
as modified herein, the terms of the Security Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall
be binding upon all parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment.
A signature delivered by facsimile or email shall constitute an original.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Danil Pollack	 
	Name: 	Danil Pollack	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	THE VANTAGE GROUP LTD.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Lyle Hauser	 
	Name:	Lyle Hauser	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 




     


     


    

 


Exhibit A


 


URL’s constituting Collateral
EXHIBIT 10.23

                          BUSINESS CONSULTING AGREEMENT


     Agreement  made this 21st day of  February,  2001 by and between  Digi Link
Technologies, Inc, having its principal office at 75 Lincoln Highway, Iselin, NJ
08830 (hereinafter "Client"),  and Frank Rovito having his office at 137 Oakmont
Court, Edison, NJ 08820 (hereinafter "Consultant").

     WHEREAS,   the  business  of  the   Consultant  is  to  advise  and  assist
corporations or other business entities with regard to communication  technology
and equipment, and

     WHEREAS,  the  Client  desires  to  retain  the  services  of a  technology
consultant.

     IT IS HEREBY agreed as follows:

     1. Retention: Client retains Consultant to advise and assist it.

     2. Term of Agreement: The term shall be for the term of one year.

     3.  Compensation  - The  Consultant  shall  receive  as a fee an  option to
purchase  200,000  shares of common stock at the  purchase  equal to the closing
price of the shares on February 21, 2001.

     4.  Non-Affiliation:  Nothing  herein  shall be  construed  as  creating  a
relationship of partners,  joint ventures or other such or similar  relationship
between the parties hereto.

     5.  Confidentiality:  In the  course  of the  performance  of  Consultant's
duties,  it is expected that  Consultant  will receive  information  that may be
considered  material  inside  information.  Consultant  will not  disclose  this
information  to others except as authorized by Client and necessary in order for
Consultant  to  perform  its  duties and  comply  with such  Federal,  State and
Municipal laws, rules and regulations or other regulatory body.

     6. Entire  Understanding:  This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties and may not be modified  except in writing and signed by the
parties hereto.

     7. Notices:  All notices  required  under this  Agreement  shall be sent by
registered or certified mail, return receipt  requested,  addressed as set forth
herein or to such other address as the parties may have notice.

                                       76
<PAGE>

     8.  Governing  Law:  This  Agreement  shall be governed by and construed in
accordance  with the laws of the State of New Jersey  and to which  jurisdiction
the parties hereto consent for the adjudication of all disputes.



     9.  Signatures:  Signatures  transmitted  by  facsimile  shall  be  legally
binding.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.


                                                 Digi Link Technologies, Inc.


By:  /s/: Frank Rovito                           By: /s/: Peter Jegou
----------------------                           -------------------------------
          Frank Rovito                                    Peter Jegou, President

                                       77