alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


Set
forth below is the description of each class of securities of Recruiter.com Group, Inc. (the “Company”) outstanding
as of December 31, 2019. The following description summarizes the most important terms of these securities. This summary does
not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws,
copies of which have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference into
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. You should refer to our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws
and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law for a complete description.


 


Common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) is the only class of our securities currently registered under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTCQB under
the symbol “RCRT.”


 


Authorized
Common Stock


 


Our
authorized Common Stock consists of 31,250,000 shares.


 


Dividend
Rights


 


Subject
to preferences that may apply to any shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of our Common Stock are entitled
to receive dividends out of funds legally available if our Board of Directors, in its discretion, determines to declare and pay
dividends and then only at the times and in the amounts that our Board of Directors may determine.


 


Voting
Rights


 


Holders
of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters properly submitted to a vote of stockholders on
which holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote. We have not provided for cumulative voting for the election of directors in
our Certificate of Incorporation. The directors are elected by a plurality of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the election
of directors. On all other matters the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present or represented
by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter constitutes the act of the stockholders, except as otherwise
expressly provided by the Delaware General Corporation Law.


 


No
Preemptive or Similar Rights


 


Our
Common Stock is not entitled to preemptive rights, and is not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions.


 


Right
to Receive Liquidation Distributions


 


If
we become subject to a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders
would be distributable ratably among the holders of our Common Stock and any participating preferred stock outstanding at that
time, subject to prior satisfaction of all outstanding debt and liabilities and the preferential rights of and the payment of
liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding shares of preferred stock.


 


Transfer
Agent and Registrar


 


Equity
Stock Transfer is the transfer agent and registrar in respect of the common stock.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ed Rensi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


  /s/ Ed Rensi
---------------------------
Ed Rensi
Chief Executive Officer
November 17, 2005
Exhibit 10.12


 


VERIFYME,
INC.


 


Amendment
to NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS NON-Plan


 


This Amendment (the
“Amendment”), dated as of April 16, 2020, by and between VerifyMe, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),
and Patrick White (the “Optionee”), amends the Non-Qualified Option Agreement Non-Plan dated April 17, 2018 and the
Non-Qualified Option Agreement Non-Plan dated August 2017, each by and between the Company and the Optionee (collectively, the
“Agreements”). Terms used herein and otherwise undefined have the meanings given such terms in the respective Agreement.


 


Whereas,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a three-year extension of the expiration date of the
option awards granted pursuant to the Agreements such that the options expire eight years from the date of grant instead of five
years.


 


Now,
Therefore, in consideration of the agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.            Section
1 of each of the Agreements is amended to provide for the grant of non-qualified eight-year stock options.


 


2.            Section
3(b) of each of the Agreements is amended to provide that subject to the terms and conditions of each of the Agreements, the Expiration
Date of the Options will be until 6:00 p.m. New York time eight years from the Grant Date.


 


3.            Except
as specifically modified or amended by the terms of this Amendment, the Agreements and all provisions contained therein are, and
shall continue, in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. All references in each of the Agreements to itself
shall be deemed references to the Agreement as amended hereby.


 


 


[Signature page follows.]


 






    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	VERIFYME, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Marshall Geller
	 	 	
        Marshall Geller

        Chair, Compensation Committee



  


ACCEPTANCE


 


I, Patrick White, hereby
certify that I have read and fully understand the foregoing Amendment. I hereby execute this Amendment to indicate my acceptance
of the Amendment and my intent to comply with the terms thereof.


 


	 	/s/ Patrick White
	 	Optionee
## Collaboration

The GeoNEX effort has informal partnerships with several organizations providing geostationary satellite data:

## 

### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Contact NOAA

### Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency(JAXA)

Contact JAXA

### Center for Environmental Remote Sensing at Chiba University (CEReS)

Contact CEReS

### Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)

Contact KARI

### National Meteorological Satellite Center (KMA)

Contact KMA
EXHIBIT
(23)





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have
issued our report, dated February 29, 2008, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. on Form S-3
(File No. 333-43426, effective August 10, 2000), and on Form S-8 (File No.
333-46860, effective September 28, 2000).











/s/
PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP











Atlanta,
Georgia


March 12,
2008
The State



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 18, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00392

- CR

Billy Bob OPPELT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR5849 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due July 7, 2014, but it was not filed. On July 14, 2014, this court notified Bettina J. Williams by letter that she is the court reporter responsible for timely filing the reporter’s record and the record had not been filed. Our notice required

Williams to file the record by August 13, 2014, unless appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record and is not entitled to the record without paying t he fee, in which case Williams was required to file a notice so advising the court no later

than July 24. W e have not received a response to our letter and the reporter’s record has not

been filed

.

We order Bettina J. Williams to file the record in this court by August 25, 2014

. Williams is advised that the court will not grant a further extension of time unless she files a

motion that (1) establishes there are extraordinary circumstances that prevent her from timely filing the record, (2) advises the court of what efforts have been expended to prepare the record and the status of completion, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court. See

T EX .R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) ( “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed” ).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

 

I, J.M. Haggar, III, ChiefExecutive Officer of Haggar Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,2003, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                           | /s/ J.M.  Haggar, III |                                       |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  February 12, 2004 |                  | J.M. Haggar,  III, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                |                       |                                            |  |

 

1

----
#### Stucker *v.*Davis.

The *innuendoes*in a declaration in slander should be warranted by the previous allegations.

*415ERROR to the *Bartholomew*Circuit Court.

*A. A. Hammond*and *H. H. Barbour,*for the plaintiff.

*W. Herod,*and *L. F. Coppersmith,*for the defendant.

Blackford, J.

Slander. The declaration, so far as it necessary to state it, alleges that a certain horse belonging to the defendant 'had been stolen, and that he, the defendant, in a conversation with divers persons of and concerning the plaintiff and of and concerning said larceny, falsely and maliciously spoke and published of and concerning the plaintiff and of and concerning said larceny the false, scandalous, and defamatory words following, to wit, I (meaning defendant) know who has my horse (meaning the horse so as aforesaid stolen); and he (the plaintiff meaning) has my horse. I (defendant meaning) have sent a company of men down there (meaning to the neighbourhood of *Tannehill’s*mills and the plaintiff’s house) to make search (meaning to search for the horse so as aforesaid stolen from the defendant), and I (the defendant meaning) verily believe he (the plaintiff’ meaning) has my horse. (Thereby meaning that the plaintiff had stolen the defendant’s horse.)

General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendant.

It is necessary in these cases that the *innuendoes*should be warranted by the previous allegations in the declaration. The words now before us, viz., that the plaintiff' had the defendant’s horse, cannot be fairly considered to signify, with the assistance of the prefatory allegations and *colloquium,*that the plaintiff' had stolen the defendant’s horse. The consequence is, that the declaration is bad on demurrer.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1727

To authorize additional appropriations for the Reclamation Safety of Dams 

Act of 1978. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 14, 2003

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To authorize additional appropriations for the Reclamation 

Safety of Dams Act of 1978.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA4 TIONS FOR THE RECLAMATION SAFETY OF 

5 DAMS ACT OF 1978. 

6 (a) REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN MODIFICATION

7 COSTS.—Section 4(c) of the Reclamation Safety of Dams 

8 Act of 1978 (43 U.S.C. 508(c)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘(c) With respect to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘2001’’ 

10 and inserting the following: 
2

•S 1727 IS 

1 ‘‘(c) REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN MODIFICATION

2 COSTS.—With respect to the additional amounts author3 ized to be appropriated by section 5’’. 

4 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

5 5 of the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978 (43 

6 U.S.C. 509) is amended in the first sentence—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and effective October 1, 2001’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘effective October 1, 2001’’; 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘and, effective October 1, 

10 2003, not to exceed an additional $540,000,000 (Oc11 tober 1, 2003, price levels),’’ after ‘‘(October 1, 

12 2001, price levels),’’; and 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘$750,000’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘$1,250,000 (October 1, 2003, price levels), as ad15 justed to reflect any ordinary fluctuations in con16 struction costs indicated by applicable engineering 

17 cost indexes,’’.

Æ
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1654

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to establish a 

do-not-call registry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Mr. HOLLINGS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission 

to establish a do-not-call registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Federal Trade Commission is 

5 authorized under section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing 

6 and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15 

7 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to compile and implement a na8 tional do-not-call registry. 

9 (b) RATIFICATION.—The do-not-call registry provi10 sion of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. 
2

S 1654 IS 

1 310.4(b)(1)(iii)), which was promulgated by the Federal 

2 Trade Commission, effective March 31, 2003, is ratified.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1812 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1812

   To amend the Home Owners' Loan Act to clarify the citizenship of 
      Federal savings associations for purposes of Federal court 
                             jurisdiction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 2003

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Home Owners' Loan Act to clarify the citizenship of 
      Federal savings associations for purposes of Federal court 
                             jurisdiction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CITIZENSHIP OF FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS FOR JURISDICTION 
              PURPOSES.

    Section 5 of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1464) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(x) Home State Citizenship.--In determining whether a Federal 
court has diversity jurisdiction over a case in which a Federal savings 
association is a party, the Federal savings association shall be 
considered to be a citizen only of the State in which such savings 
association has its main office.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1081

DANIEL AKIYOYOVBI OGHENOCHUKO,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-429-494)

Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: November 1, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Roberts, LAW OFFICES OF JAMES A. ROBERTS, Falls Church,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Bryan S.

Beier, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*While we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s denial of

Oghenochuko’s motion to reopen because he did not petition for

review of that order within thirty days, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)

(2000), we find that we have jurisdiction to review the Board’s

order denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(6)

(2000); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 393 (1995) (concluding that

when “amending the [Immigration and Nationality Act] Congress chose

to depart from the ordinary judicial treatment of agency orders

under reconsideration”).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Akiyoyovbi Oghenochuko, a native and citizen of

Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its

denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings.* We have

reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find

that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty,

502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Ancillary Study in Necrotizing Enterocolitis.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maria E. Davila-Bloom, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 758, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7637,                         *davila-bloomm@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 26, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-27569 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Derma
Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.

|                        |                                                                                                              | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Dated:  August 14, 2009 | /s/ John E. Yetter                                                                                           | 
|                        | John E. Yetter, CPA
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer) |