alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, John Kallas, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.(the “Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2006   /s/ JOHN KALLAS John Kallas  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of CCC
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance
Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
David Martin, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ R. David Martin
R. David Martin
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
July 29, 2003
# The Corps Environment - May 2020 issue now available

This edition highlights protecting and preserving the environment, in support of Environmental Operating Principle #4. The content within this issue showcases the extraordinary environmental stewardship efforts across the Army.

 

The May 2020 edition of The Corps Environment is now available! This edition highlights protecting and preserving the environment, in support of Environmental Operating Principle #4. The content within this issue showcases the extraordinary environmental stewardship efforts across the Army. Read the latest issue here. 

Content includes: Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment Alex Beehler’s Army Earth Day message; highlights the five installations and three teams recognized as winners in the 2020 Secretary of the Army Environmental Awards Program; and celebrates some of our environmental heroes, who have spent their careers championing environmental stewardship across different disciplines, including scientific research and geology... and much more!

environment

The Corps Environment

environmental operating principles

USACE

USACE Environmental Division
EXHIBIT
32.2








Section 1350 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer








In connection with the quarterly report of Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
P, Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
report.









Date: 
      May 1, 2009
            /s/ Douglas P.
      Baker
              Douglas
      P. Baker
              Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Vincent Earl THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aubrey GREGORY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a City of Louisville Police Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5557.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 2003.

John R. Shelton, Sales, Tillman & Walbaum, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lisa A. Schweiekart, Jefferson County Attorney’s Office, Louisville, KY, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Vincent Earl Thompson, appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant Aubrey Gregory. Plaintiff asserted, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that his constitutional rights were violated when defendant arrested him for violating an emergency protective order. Plaintiff also asserted pendent state law claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, and battery.

*587Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant. The district court correctly determined that defendant had probable cause to make the arrest and he was entitled to qualified immunity. It also correctly determined that, since defendant had probable cause to make the arrest, the pendent state claims were without merit.

Because the reasoning which supports summary judgment for defendant has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the Order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Memorandum Opinion filed on March 28, 2002.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAOHUA CHANG,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 16-71456

Agency No. A089-747-808

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2019** 

Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

FILED

SEP 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Shaohua Chang petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying her

claim for asylum.

1

 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

The BIA’s determination that Chang did not testify credibly is supported by

substantial evidence. Chang’s testimony that she was introduced to Christianity in

2005, was inconsistent with her son’s testimony, which indicated that Chang had

been a practicing Christian over ten years earlier. This inconsistency was not

minor, cf. Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1086 (9th Cir. 2011); rather, it undercut

Chang’s testimony that she was introduced to Christianity as a result of

unemployment and was persecuted shortly thereafter. Moreover, the IJ’s

conclusion that Chang’s “explosive” interruption of her son’s testimony weighed

against her credibility is entitled to particular deference because it is an assessment

of Chang’s demeanor. See Ling Huang v. Holder, 744 F.3d 1149, 1153–54 (9th

Cir. 2014). Further, the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determination was also

supported by the lack of detail in Chang’s testimony regarding her prior abortion

1

 Because Chang did not challenge the IJ’s denials of withholding of

removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) in her appeal

to the BIA, these claims were not exhausted, and we lack jurisdiction to address

them here. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

2
and her inability to recall important dates in her life. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii).

Finally, the IJ was not required to afford Chang an opportunity to provide

additional corroborative evidence because the IJ determined that Chang’s

testimony was not credible. See Yali Wang v. Sessions, 861 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th

Cir. 2017); Ren, 648 F.3d at 1091–92.

Without Chang’s credible testimony, there is insufficient evidence in the

record for Chang to meet her burden of proving eligibility for asylum.

PETITION DENIED.

3
Exhibit



[ ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.







Exhibit 10.1










AMENDMENT NUMBER TEN TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
WAFER SUPPLY AGREEMENT


This Amendment Number Ten (the “Amendment”), is effective as of December 16, 2019 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), and amends the Amended and Restated Wafer Supply Agreement that is effective as of April 1, 2003, as further amended by Amendment Number One that is effective as of August 11, 2004, Amendment Number Two, that is effective as of April 1, 2008, Amendment Number Three, that is effective as of June 9, 2008, Amendment Number Four, that is effective as of June 13, 2008, Amendment Number Five that is effective as of November 14, 2008, Amendment Number Six that is effective as of November 1, 2015, Amendment Number Seven that is effective as of August 8, 2016, Amendment Number Eight that is effective as of July 26, 2017, and Amendment Number Nine that is effective as of February 6, 2019, (the “Agreement”), by and between Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation having its registered head office at 2-4-8 Shinyokohama, Kouhoku-ku Yokohama 222-8575 Japan (“Lapis”), and Power Integrations, Ltd. d.b.a. Power Integrations International, Ltd. (“PI”) a Cayman Islands corporation having its principal place of business at 4th Floor, Century Yard, Cricket Square, Elgin Avenue, P.O. Box 32322, Grand Cayman K Y 1-1209. Unless specifically designated otherwise, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings given them in the Agreement.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, PI and LAPIS desire to amend the terms of the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18. 10 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing duly executed by authorized officers of LAPIS and PI.


Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:









AGREEMENT


		
	1.
	Add the following new article: ARTICLE 25. [ * ]. 




25.1    [ * ].  PI shall make [ * ] to SUPPLIER for [ * ] 


25.2    [ * ]. A [ * ] will be issued by SUPPLIER at the end of each calendar quarter beginning in Q1 2020 [ * ] during such quarter, [ * ].


25.3    If the [ * ] on or before the termination or expiry of the Agreement, SUPPLIER shall, on such date, provide PI, [ *].


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


	
		
	LAPIS SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
	POWER INTEGRATIONS, LTD. d.b.a. POWER INTEGRATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

	Signature: /Akira Yamazaki/
	Signature: /Raja Petrakian/

	Name:  Akira Yamazaki
	Name:        Raja Petrakian

	Title:    General Manager
	Title:          President and Director

	2020.1.20
	January 21, 2020
Exhibit 32
 
 Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund. Date:March 13, 2020/s/ Matthew S. BloomMATTHEW S. BLOOMChief Executive OfficerDate:March 13, 2020/s/ Brian S. WilliamsBRIAN S. WILLIAMSChief Financial Officer
 The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund or the certifying officers.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Guggenheim Credit Income Fund and will be retained by Guggenheim Credit Income Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 min read

# NASA Captures Supersonic Shock Interaction

### NASA

Mar 06, 2019

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

Using the schlieren photography technique, NASA was able to capture the first air-to-air images of the interaction of shockwaves from two supersonic aircraft flying in formation. These two U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School T-38 aircraft are flying in formation, approximately 30 feet apart, at supersonic speeds, or faster than the speed of sound, producing shockwaves that are typically heard on the ground as a sonic boom. This image was captured during the fourth phase of the Air-to-Air Background Oriented Schlieren flights, or AirBOS which took place at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California.  These flights were flown, in part, to better understand how shocks interact with aircraft plumes, as well as with each other.

Read more about AirBOS Phase 4 flight tests.

**February 2019The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 06, 2019								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman**
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1688
NUMBER 13-18-00205-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

 

PM MANAGEMENT-PORTLAND NC, LLC D/B/A

TRISUN CARE CENTER COASTAL PALMS AND 

SENIOR CARE CENTERS, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

BENITA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND

ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF

RUBEN MARTINEZ, DECEASED, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellee Benita Martinez, individually and on behalf of the estate of Ruben 

Martinez, deceased (Martinez) filed suit against appellant PM Management-Portland NC, 
2

LLC d/b/a Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers, LLC (PM 

Management) and appellants, Manzoor A. Bevinal, M.D., Bipasha Nath, M.D., and 

Corpus Christi Hospitalists, P.L.L.C. (collectively CC Hospitalists). PM Management and 

CC Hospitalists have each perfected an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order 

denying their respective motions to dismiss Martinez’s suit. 

PM Management and CC Hospitalists have filed separate unopposed motions to 

dismiss the appeal. PM Management represents that it has reached a settlement 

agreement with Martinez. CC Hospitalists represent that Martinez has filed a motion to 

dismiss her claims against them in the trial court. The Court, having considered the 

documents on file and the unopposed motions to dismiss, is of the opinion that the 

motions should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. 42.1(a)(1). The motions to dismiss are

granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the 

parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. R 42.1(d). Having 

dismissed the appeal at the appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

24th day of September, 2020.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1648

To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria 

of California is deemed to be held in trust. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL

To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the 

Lytton Rancheria of California is deemed to be held 

in trust.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA. 

4 Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act 

5 (114 Stat. 2919) is amended by striking the last sentence.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED APRIL 29,
2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,309
<INVENTORY>                                    205,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,338<F1>
<PP&E>                                         124,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,493<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,091
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,493
<SALES>                                         93,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,099
<CGS>                                           68,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    759
<INCOME-TAX>                                       288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03<F5>
<FN>
<F1>8,525 Other Current Assets
<F2>1,632 Other Assets
<F3>35,936 Long Term Debt
<F4>2,520 Deferred Income Taxes
<F5>The earnings per share calculations have been prepared in accordance with
SFAS No. 128 and basic and diluted earnings per share have been entered in place
of primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</FN>


</TABLE>