alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCJH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          24,075                  24,075
<SECURITIES>                                    16,667                  16,667
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,676                  19,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,280)                 (2,280)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,857                  59,857
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,764)                (24,764)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,921                  72,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,074                  27,074
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        93,098                  93,098
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,251)                (47,251)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,847                  45,847
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,369                  46,452
<CGS>                                            4,265                  13,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,442                  51,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (445)                 (1,036)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    372                 (3,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        98                     353
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                274                 (4,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       274                 (4,340)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                  (0.12)


</TABLE>
#### Etchison *v.*Post.

*Monday, May*27.

^ count on tort cannot tie joined with one on contract, even in a suit before a justice of the peace.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Circuit Court. *J*

*C. B.*Smith, for the plaintiff.

*J. S. Newman*and & *TV.*Parker, for the defendant.

Dewey, J.

This was an action commenced before a justice of the peace, and taken by appeal to the Circuit Court. The statement of the plaintiff’s demand contained two causes of action — one founded on contract, and the other on tort. In'the'Circuit Court the defendant moved to suppress the latter-. The motion was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted. The parties then went to trial by the Court without a jury on the remaining cause of action. The Court, after hearing the evidence, nonsuited the plaintiff and rendered judgment against him for costs. He moved for a new trial, but his motion was overruled, and he excepted.

We conceive no error was committed by the Circuit Court in rejecting the cause of action founded on tort. It is true, that if in commencing á suit before a justice a plaintiff misconceives the form of action, it is no cause of nonsuit, provided enough be stated to apprize the defendant of the real demand against him. Stat. 1835, p. 52. But we do not con:''s?dei--fháí tljfe statute which contains this provision, ought to receive a construction so broad as to do away all objections to' a ¿hs^o&rker of actions. Its object is to protect the parties against th.e consequences of technical inaccuracies. It could riot,1 we tiiink, have been the intention of the legislature so far •to, confound well established and material distinctions, as to authorise a clearly defined cause of action founded on tort, to be joined with one arising from contract. Perhaps, had the plaintiff claimed the right, he was entitled to elect which branch of his action should have been retained; but he was not authorised to join contract and tort in the same action.

We haye looked through the evidence, which is spread upon the record, and concur with the Circuit Court in the conclusion which they formed upon it.

Per *Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-51254 and 333-113224 on Form S-8 and in Registration No. 333-129860 on Form S-3 of Pacific Financial Corporation of our reports, dated March 13, 2006 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

 

Tacoma, Washington

March 8, 2007
# Gender differences diagram from NSBRI/NASA

Gender differences

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/gender-differences-diagram-from-nsbri-nasa/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x804pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 18, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Flight Surgeon Moriah Thompson

"But everything, every medical procedure — you have to rethink it when you’re talking about spaceflight. It’s kind of like what I enjoy about emergency medicine, how you never know what’s going to come in the door. “ — Moriah Thompson, Flight Surgeon, Johnson Space Center

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/flight-surgeon-moriah-thompson-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Women's History Month
Size1041x709pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 12, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michelle Zajac								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Larry A. Goldstone

Larry A. Goldstone
President and Chief Operating Officer
November 13, 2003
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CLIFFORD N. WOODS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

EL PASO COUNTY MEDICAL

ADMINISTRATION; JUDY FENDER,

El Paso County Health Services Admin.;

EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF; JAY A.

LAUER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-1121

(D.C. No. 1:07-CV-00703-PAB-KMT)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1 and 3.3(B).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1121 Document: 01018461040 Date Filed: 07/21/2010 Page: 1
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00516- CR

Mark Anthony Serrano, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 391 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 4-0 081- SA, H ONO RAB LE B ARB ARA L. WALTH ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R

P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appea l was orig inally due on November 20, 2014. On counsel’s motions, the deadline for filing was extended to Marc h 5, 2015. Appellant’s counsel has now filed

a f o u r th mo ti o n a s k in g th a

t th e Co u r t e xte n d th e ti me f

o r f il in g a p p e ll a n t’ s b r ie f u

n ti l M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 1 5

. We g rant the motion and o rd er appellant to file a brief no later than Marc h 31, 2015. No further extension of tim e will be g rante d and failure to c omply with this order will result in the refe rra l of th is c a s e to th e tr ia l c o u

r t f o r a h e a r in g u n d e r Ru le 3 8

. 8 ( b ) o f th e T e xa s Ru le s o f A p p e ll a te Pr o c e d u r e . I t is ordere d on Marc h 13, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Do Not Publish
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 22, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CAS TANNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

CHOCTAW CASINO OF DURANT,

OKLAHOMA; CHOCTAW NATION OF

OKLAHOMA,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-7089

(D.C. No. 6:09-CV-00272-RAW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 

10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-7089 Document: 01018354011 Date Filed: 01/22/2010 Page: 1
## Meet our team

“The objective of the NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) is to bring scientists together with the tools, massive global datasets, and supercomputers necessary to accelerate research in Earth systems science and global change.”

## 				NEX Core Team			

## Ian Brosnan

NEX Principal Investigator

## Weile Wang

Land Remote Sensing and Modeling

## Hirofumi Hashimoto

Land Remote Sensing and Modeling

## Taejin Park

Land Remote Sensing and Climate Science

## Arthur Mizzi

Data Assimilation and Air Quality Forecasting

## Alberto Guzman

Data Science: From Translation to Evapotranspiration 

## Will Carrara

Development of the project’s API and cloud infrastructure

## Wen Yip

Project Management, Resource and Science Support

## Conor Doherty

Mathematical modeling of remotely sensed environmental time series data

## Morgan Gilmour

Marine Ecology: Remote Sensing and Seabird Tracking

## Claire Teitelbaum

Disease Ecology: Remote Sensing and Waterfowl Tracking

## Aishwarya Raman

Atmospheric modeling, satellite remote sensing and data assimilation for atmospheric composition forecasts.

## Sepideh Khajehei

Hydrology and climate science

## Kyle Kabasares

Machine Learning for Remote Sensing Applications

## Jeremy Benik

Fire Modeling and atmospheric modeling

## Andrew Michaelis

High Performance Computing Research 

## Ramakrishna Nemani

NEX Advisor
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.6
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO THE
L3HARRIS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


WHEREAS, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“L3Harris”), heretofore has adopted and maintains the L3Harris Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2020 (the "Plan");


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.1 of the Plan, the Employee Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) of L3Harris has the authority to amend the Plan;


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Plan, the Committee has delegated certain of such amendment authority to L3Harris’s head of global benefits (currently, the Senior Director, Global Benefits) (the “Head of Global Benefits”); and


WHEREAS, the Head of Global Benefits desires to amend the Plan to include hazard and hardship pay as eligible compensation.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective February 1, 2020, clause (c) within the definition of “Compensation” set forth in Article 2 of the Plan hereby is amended to read as follows:


(c) hazard or hardship pay, overtime premium, additional compensation in lieu of overtime premium or shift differential;
    
APPROVED by the HEAD OF GLOBAL BENEFITS on this 19th day of February, 2020.


/s/ Allison Oncel         
Allison Oncel
Senior Director, Global Benefits


1
# Sitemap

## April 02, 1999

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1999
- 04
- April 02, 1999

            - Significant Event Report for Week Ending 4/2/1999
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1662

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the work opportunity 

tax credit to include trade adjustment assistance recipients as a targeted 

group. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2003

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the work opportunity tax credit to include trade adjustment assistance recipients as a targeted group.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT 

4 TO COVER TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 

5 RECIPIENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (related to members 

8 of targeted groups) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

9 end of subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the 
2

•S 1662 IS 

1 end of subparagraph (H) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by add2 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(I) a qualified TAA recipient.’’. 

4 (b) QUALIFIED TAA RECIPIENT.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 51 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 

7 redesignating paragraphs (10), (11), and (12) as 

8 paragraphs (11), (12), and (13), respectively, and by 

9 inserting after paragraph (9) the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(10) QUALIFIED TAA RECIPIENT.—The term 

12 ‘qualified TAA recipient’ means any individual who 

13 is certified by the designated local agency as receiv14 ing trade adjustment assistance benefits under chap15 ter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 for any 

16 month ending within the 60-day period ending on 

17 the hiring date.’’. 

18 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

19 51A(c)(1) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘sec20 tion 51(d)(11)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 51(d)(12)’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

23 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit No. 15

                    INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF
CHROMATICS COLOR SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Chromatics Color Sciences
International, Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 1998 and 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and in our report dated
February 17, 1998, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements, indicating that the financial statements were prepared
on a going concern basis that might not be appropriate due to significant
operating losses. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.

                                                       WISS & COMPANY, LLP

Livingston, New Jersey
May 14, 1998

                                      33
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140860 

ARCHIE SHARP, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140860 

 COA: 290154 

Court of Claims: 08-000099-MK 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-16-1997

Williams v. Runyon

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-5035

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Williams v. Runyon" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 274.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/274
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 97-5035 

 Williams vs. Runyon, et al 

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's 

Opinion issued on November 28, 1997 in the above-entitled appeal 

and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 

 On page 3, second line from the top, the last word "sex" 

should be replaced with the word "sexual." 

 On page 4, first line, the word "her" should be replaced 

with the word "Williams'". 

 On page 5 of the slip opinion, 10 lines from the bottom: 

"Red. R. Civ. P." should be "Fed. R. Civ. P." 

 On page 6, 5 lines into Section II, there should be a period 

after "Fed." 

 On page 6, 3 lines from the bottom, the word " defendants' " 

preceding right to raise...' should be replaced with 

"defendant's". 

 

 On page 8, in the third full paragraph, the word "the" 

preceding "Williams had exhausted" should be deleted. 

 On pages 8 and 9, the last two lines of each: "April 24, 

1995" should be replaced with "April 24, 1996" 

 

 Very truly yours, 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, 

 Clerk 

Dated: December 15, 1997
#### Cain *v.*Foote.

A writ of error will not lie to a decree of the Circuit Court dissolving an injunction of a judgment at law.

But an appeal, under the act of 1843, may be taken in such case.

ERROR to the *Marion*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

The plaintiff in error filed a bill in chancery for an injunction of a judgment at law against him; and the injunction was granted in vacation by the Circuit. Judge. At the'next term, on the coming in of the answer, the injunction was dissolved. An appeal from the dissolution was taken to this Court; but the law on the subject not having been complied with, the cause was docketed as a case in error.

The defendant now moves the Court to dismiss the writ of error for the want of jurisdiction.

The dissolving of the injunction was merely an interlocutory order. The complainant had still a right to proceed in the cause by taking depositions. To such an interlocutory order' a writ of error does not lie. *Young*v. *Grundy,*6 Cranch, 51.

By statute, an appeal lies from such a decree as that before us, but the appeal must be taken at the time when the decree is made. R. S. 1843, p. 637. In this case, the appeal which had been taken not having been perfected in the manner prescribed by law, the case stands as if no appeal had been taken. And a writ of error will not lie, the decree not being final. ,

*455
      *W. Quarles*and *J. H. Bradley,*for the plaintiff.

*O. H. Smith,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The writ of error is dismissed with costs.