alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

APPELLANT, DOCKET NUMBER

BARTON J. POWELL CH-0353-10-0854-I-1

JAMES C. LATHAM, et al. Versus DOCKET NUMBER
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE DA-0353-10-0408-I-1

AUGUST, 12, 2011

APPELLANTS REQUEST FOR INCLUSION
“AMICUS BRIEFS"

1am a letter carrier, level 6, who was placed by NRP in a mailhandier level 4 position November of
2008 to start January 3rd, 2009 at Palatine P & DC as a mailhandier. | had a job modification to
accomodate my restrictions on limited duty in place at the Arlington Heights Post Office and that
was before NRP came in and told me | was being reassigned to Palatine P & DC.

''m capable of delivering mail within my restrictions. | can deliver to curb side boxes, apartment
routes, NDCBU'S and businesses. | can still case routes.

| would like to be included in the “Amicus Briefs", to restore my job at the Arlington Heights.
Post Office as a letter carrier.

| know of people still not removed by NRP on restrictions with less seniority than me whom are
still working.

{'m aware of the article regulation at’ CFR 353.301(d). | feel that it still not happened anal feels
that it's still a violation of the blanket contract protecting injured employees to find work Within
their restrictions. 3

20:2 Wd 22 ony



PRIORITY MAIL TO: MATTHEW SHANNON
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
1615 M STREET, NW.,
WASHINGTON, DC 20419

pate_ 8/27 20 1/ appevanr ora ome



spansesas SYBU MY $002 190 “eayAI0g 16)80d ‘SN © sh LA ‘o(6S91 1} ou s BuBeyaed sr, mix OPA) JO LONMION wag Kew asnemy

“Susuidiys grey Apsops Bixpuas uy asn 204 Ayajos papysaid sy pur @AdlAes 23804 "S17 aXp Jo Ayedasd oly Sy Cufbeyoed sy)

“TAIN

4 Be gh
bihor. sq! waybentsen 0s se?
cons Larvle Ww Si7) . 44
» Grvog nosivzled goalshs woe ae :
Geog apd ve7IND AHLSO 93/350 OL. , i
8 oo reoEwHS mageas ;
+e ye oa y ; eb
> we. Bac ii i
fs 3 a oes ;
“ 8
ye ~ we
oO
x oo : ‘
£Sy SDiAUISTWLSOd S3LLS GALINA -
y 2

ea| “ss ALOR a |

sneupediey/ruioi

wioo'sdsn 38 Sn Sif,

Sf jeuoRewe}u] pue‘oRsauiog Joy
Sdojenuy Buiyey\y
SPY 24

“Doan wea vommeneoen woanag et 8
sdionpuos pq d) 08 vopmaucini avo soy 'ut

“SIEVOP 10} Sye]OOSs~e |
AOS sdstrod ye (WWI) renuey) ire
“|. BW YNSUON ‘palnbau aie su

Salddv WNE
NO LIT 1HOIS/

iXIddV SNOLLOIULS3Y-IWNE

*aunsoyo 30 suBew i
eajsOUpe Oty YM edojsaue OLp LILA p
© @fe SwEWOS otf} pus ‘peyipolls you s} ¢

- ‘Buo) se ‘pasojoue eg Aew reyeyaw siqeew

SDIANIS TV1SOd SLY,

IV |

Hedy dh aye
AlWald SS3Hd ASVATA

cee?

.  SuuoeBEISodjwoo'sdsn 0} oD - Suyjud aBeysod wud.

ATWHIA SSIUA ISVSIS
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Medina International Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K (the  "Report") for the period ending April 30,
2009 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"). I, Daniel Medina, President of the company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC Section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Daniel Medina
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Daniel Medina, President
Date: October 19, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1179 

KA 12-00387 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAKOTA MIX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered January 23, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a

controlled substance in the fifth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea

of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth

degree (Penal Law § 220.31), defendant contends that County Court

abused its discretion in denying his request to adjudicate him a

youthful offender. We reject that contention. “ ‘The determination .

. . whether to grant . . . youthful offender status rests within the

sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts

and circumstances of the case’ ” (People v Dawson, 71 AD3d 1490, 1490,

lv denied 15 NY3d 749). Here, the record reflects that the court

considered the relevant facts and circumstances in denying defendant’s

request. Although the crime was not particularly grave and did not

involve violence, the remaining factors to be considered upon the

application for youthful offender treatment weighed against such a

determination (cf. People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930). Defendant

has been involved with probation since he was 12 years old based on

orders adjudicating him to be a person in need of supervision and

juvenile delinquency adjudications and has been offered many services,

but he continued to violate probation and was ultimately placed with

the Office of Children and Family Services for 18 months. Defendant

did not take responsibility for the instant offense and was

uncooperative during his presentence interview. Defendant dropped out

of school after the 10th grade and, although he was 19 years old at

the time of sentencing, he had no verifiable employment and no plans

for future employment in the area. The probation officer recommended

against probation and believed that defendant’s prospects for
-2- 1179 

KA 12-00387 

rehabilitation and hope for a future constructive life were poor. We

therefore conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in

denying defendant’s request.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ESW CAPITAL, L.L.C.,

 Appellant,

v.

PLATO LABS, INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00256-CV

Appeal from the

200th District Court

of Travis County, Texas1

(TC# D-1-GN-17-000883)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant ESW Capital, L.L.C., has filed an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of 

this appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. 

Per the agreement of the parties, costs are assessed against the party that incurred them. See

TEX.R.APP. P. 42.1(d).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

February 7, 2020

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Scivanta Medical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Thomas S. Gifford, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




January
      28, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Thomas S. GiffordThomas
      S. GiffordExecutive
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial Officer andSecretary
Exhibit 32.3





Certification of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: December 9, 2010





/s/ Brian W. WhiteBrian W. WhiteChief Financial Officer
Recommendation: 

NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Destination Selection 

2012-01-01 (HEOC-01) 

The Council recommends selecting a human spaceflight destination. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

With the approval of a Space Launch System (SLS) Booster, the Orion spacecraft, and 

Exploration Ground System, planning can now begin on the destination mission. With initial 

crewed flight in 2021, the first operational flight could occur as early as 2022. Given the budget 

reality and development time for new hardware and software (which is estimated to be at least 

ten years), now is the time to pick a specific destination in order to focus the NASA, 

international agencies, and contractor teams on a specific destination, such as Mars. In addition, 

the near and interim steps in order to achieve the ultimate objective should also be defined. We 

believe that a focused mission with a specific end objective, as has been the case for over 50 

years for human spaceflight programs, would also greatly benefit the NASA workforce, current 

and future domestic and International Partners and the public stakeholders. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Without selecting a mission, we will delay a human flight to a destination. In addition, it will be 

difficult for the International Partners to determine where they can contribute to the human 

exploration program. Further, without a specific program definition, it will become increasingly 

difficult to get the American public excited about the future of NASA. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with the intent of this recommendation. NASA's ultimate destination for human 

exploration in the next half century is Mars. Consistent with policy and law, NASA is planning 

an asteroid mission as the first part of a capability-driven approach to explore multiple deepspace destinations. Mission analysis and international discussions supporting these efforts are 

ongoing. NASA will ramp up our capabilities to reach - and operate at - a series of increasingly 

demanding targets, while advancing our technological capabilities with each step forward. This 

will include early test and demonstration activities in cis-lunar space as called for in the 2010 

NASA Authorization Act. Along these lines, we will fully tap the potential of the International 

Space Station. We will also conduct a series of test and demonstration flights. For example, we 

plan to test flights of an uncrewed Orion spacecraft in 2014 and of the SLS in 2017, followed by 

a crewed mission in 2021 as part of developing the foundation for our longer journeys. NASA's 

Orion and SLS will enable the Agency to send astronauts beyond Low Earth Orbit for the first 

time since 1972 and will provide the Nation a capability and architecture designed to also allow 

flexibility, partnering, and technological on-ramps. This approach provides a path for a 

sustainable program to extend human presence into the solar system. 

Enclosure
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-79,568-02 AND WR-79,568-03

EX P ARTE NATHAN L. GOODWIN, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 10CR1699-83-1 AN D 10CR1700- 83-1 IN THE 212T H DISTRICT COURT FROM G ALVEST ON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of th e T ex as C o de of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court t ra n s m i t t ed t o t his Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated robber y and fe lon possessing a

firea rm and wa s sentence d to c oncurr ent terms of seventy-five a nd fi fty year s in prison, respe ctively
. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed the convic t i o n s . Goodwin v State , Nos. 14-12-00274- CR and 14-12-00275- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 12, 2013)
. Applicant contends that he was denied his right, through no fault of his own, to pur sue pro
se petitions for discretionar y rev i ew i n t h i s Court afte r his convictions wer e aff irmed by the Four teenth Court of Appea ls. The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d, and the writ rec ord-2-

supports the rec ommendation. See Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25, 26 -27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W .3d 135, 138-39 (Te x . Crim. App. 2005). Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionar y revie w of the judgme nts of the Four teenth Court of Appea ls in Cause Nos. 14-12-0 0 2 7 4 -C R and 14-12- 00275-C R t h at af

firmed his conviction in Cause Nos. 10CR1699 and 10CR1700 from the 212th District Court of Galveston County
. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionar y revie w with this Court wit hin 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to th e T exas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 30, 2013 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65319-65320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-113-000]


Sandy Ridge Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 15, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Sandy Ridge Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to

[[Page 65320]]

intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 4, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5939087969abbb9bcbbb086a0a5a5baa7a195b3b0a7b6fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b6d6e796864454742454e785e5b5b44595f6b4d4e5948054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26759 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Stonepath Group, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date: January 16, 2004                 By: /s/ Dennis L. Pelino
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Dennis L. Pelino
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


            This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Stonepath Group, Inc. and will be retained by Stonepath
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### KENNETH S. HOWER, ETC., ET AL. v. PICINICH & RIGOLOSI, P.A., ET AL.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
- Humans in Space
- Why Go to Space
- Astronauts   - Astronauts Home
  - Active Astronauts
  - Management Astronauts
  - Former Astronauts
  - Astronaut Candidates
  - Partner Astronauts
  - Become an Astronaut
  - Spacesuits
- Living in Space
- Commercial Space
- More   - Destinations
  - Spaceships and Rockets
  - News and Events
  - Multimedia  Antarctic StationsActive Mission
About
				Mission Overview                			
NSF
				National Science Foundation                			
FAQ
				Frequently Asked Questions                			
Antarctica’s climate, terrain, temperature, and isolation provide an environment on Earth that closely parallels the conditions of isolation and stress that astronauts will face on long-duration missions in space. This analog provides a unique and accessible test bed to develop prototype systems and technologies for use on the Moon and Mars. 

Location
Antarctica
Environment
Closed Habitat 
Hazards
Isolation and Confinement
Season
Winter  Featured StoryClowning Around Lightens the Load: NASA Studies Team Dynamics in Antarctica
Often called “White Mars” because of its desolation and extreme environment, teams working in Antarctica are ripe for psychological studies…
Read the Story  Latest Antarctic Content
Stay up-to-date with the latest content from NASA as we explore the universe and discover more about our home planet.
NASA’s IceBridge Antarctic Campaign Wraps Up							3 min read						
NASA’s Operation IceBridge recently completed its 2014 Antarctic campaign, marking the mission’s sixth set of flights over Antarctica. During the…
Article    Media10 Images  Keep ExploringDiscover More Topics From NASA
Humans In Space

Artemis

Astronauts Home

Space Station Research and Technology
    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 26, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mohana Kumar								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    200
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          200
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   5,570
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                             (6,389)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              200
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        6,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (6,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (6,370)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>