alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Mississippi Valley Division News

Mississippi Valley Division News RSS Feed

- Mississippi Valley Division’s R5: Forging ahead for FY21 The week of Oct. 19 – 23 was bustling at Vicksburg District headquarters as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley Division (MVD) and District leaders convened for the annual major subordinate command (MSC) Regional Governance Boards known as R5. If you aren’t familiar with the R5, the purpose of the meeting is a financial, program, and project review of the previous fiscal year (FY) and an assessment of the upcoming three FYs with a focus on the direction of the organization through the development of Lines of Effort (LoE).
# Countdown to Apollo 11

Command Module pilot Michael Collins practices in the CM simulator on June 19, 1969, at Kennedy Space Center.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/countdown-apollo-11-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASASize1041x811pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 26, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### Jones and Another *v.*Martin.—On appeal.

Thursday, *May*28.

A *SCIRE FACIAS,*issued by a justice of the peace against bail for the stay of execution, was returned executed, and a judgment by default rendered by the justice. Appeal by the defendant to the Circuit Court. The' defendant appeared in the Circuit Court, and pleaded *nul tiel record*to *the scire facias.*Afterwards, *on the*defendant’s motion, the suit was dismissed because the name of the justice was not subscribed to the *scire facias. Held,*that the judgment was erroneous; the- objection to the writ being waived by the appearance and plea to the action. *Wibright*v. *Wise,*4 Blackf. *137*.—Perkins v. *Smith,*id. 299.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, George Mappin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


  /s/ George Mappin
--------------------------
George Mappin
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005
# The Expedition 1 crew inspects the station’s Node 1 module

97E-02488 (July 21, 1997) --- Members of the first crew of the International Space Station from left, ISS Commander astronaut Bill Shepherd, ISS Flight Engineer cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev and Soyuz Commander cosmonaut Yuri Gidzenko inspect the station's Node 1 as it nears completion of construction at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Al. in May 1997. In June 1998, Node 1 will become the first U.S.-built station component to be launched and will be an integral portion of the station when the crew arrives on board in January 1999. The crew has been in training for the mission since late 1996 with training segments held in both the U.S. and Russia.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/97e02488-9474353158-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize2000x1363pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH and Unipath Diagnostics, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MIZUHO USA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-1390.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Aug. 14, 2003.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Mizuho USA, Inc. moves for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing its appeal, 03-1390.

Mizuho’s appeal 03-1390 was consolidated with a related case, *Inverness v. Pfizer, Inc.,*03-1391. Inverness and Pfizer settled their dispute and the court granted Inverness’ and Pfizer’s joint motion to dismiss voluntarily 03-1390, -1391. However, Mizuho was not a party to the motion to dismiss and thus its appeal should not have been dismissed based on that motion.*

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Mizuho’s motion for reconsideration is granted.

(2) The June 16, 2003 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.

(4) The briefing schedule is stayed pending the court’s ruling on Inverness’ motion to dismiss.

*

 The court will rule on Inverness Medical Switzerland GmbBH et al.’s motion to dismiss in a separate order.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26709]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Basic Behavioral and Social Science Opportunity Network (OppNet)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A two-day meeting highlighting OppNet's activities and future 
goals is scheduled for Thursday, October 28, and Friday, October 29, 
2010, at the Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20001. This is the first public meeting to 
promote and publicize the Basic Behavioral and Social Science 
Opportunity Network (OppNet) initiative. Attendance is limited to prior 
registration via http://www.regonline.com/oppnet.
    Background: The Basic Behavioral and Social Science Opportunity 
Network (OppNet) is a trans-NIH initiative to expand the agency's 
funding of basic behavioral and social sciences research (b-BSSR). 
OppNet prioritizes activities and initiatives that focus on basic 
mechanisms of behavior and social processes that are relevant to the 
missions and public health challenges of multiple NIH Institutes, 
Centers, and Offices (ICOs) and that build upon existing NIH 
investments without replicating them. http://www.oppnet.nih.gov.
    Participating: The meeting will take place on October 28, from 9 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and October 29, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., at the 
Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., 
Washington DC 20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To register, visit the registration 
Web site at http://regonline.com/oppnet, call William Elwood at 301-
402-0116, or e-mail [email protected].

    Dated: October 15, 2010.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Principal Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-26709 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### Whittelsey and Wife *v.*Beall.

Tuesday, May 28.

In a bill of foreclosure and for a sale of the land mortgaged, the premises must be so described that, should a sale be decreed, the officer may know on what land to enter to execute the order of the Court.

ERROR to the *Knox*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

Bill to foreclose a mortgage. The bill states that Whittelsey'was indebted to *Beall*in the sum of 1,605 dollars, and to secure the payment, *Whittelsey*and wife executed to the complainant a mortgage on a tract of land described in the bill as follows, viz. K That certain tract or parcel of land containing 300 acres, lying and being in the county of *Knox*and state of *Indiana,*about four miles north-east of *Vincennes*and adjoining lands of *David McCord*and others, being the same tract of land that was conveyed to said *Isaac N. Whittelsey*by *Benjamin Tomlinson*and *John Ross,*on the 25th day of *May,*1837.”

The defendants demurred to the bill, and the demurrer was overruled by the Court. After other proceedings not necessary now to be noticed, the bill was taken as confessed, and the Court decreed the foreclosure of the equity of redemption, the payment of the money due by a certain day named, and in default of payment that the sheriff sell the said mortgaged premises to the highest bidder, at public vendue, as other lands are sold on execution, and that he make a deed of conveyance to the purchaser, &c. .

*144
      *S.*Judah, for the plaintiffs.

*R. Crawford,*for the defendant.

The objection urged to the bill is, that the description of jan¿ jg †00 jn¿efinite to authorise the Court to make a decree ordering the sale of it.

We think the objection well taken. We do not mean to . say that the description is so vague as to make the deed inoperative. It may be sufficient to convey the land. That point however is not before us. But we think the bill is defective in not so describing the land, that the officer of the Court may know on what premises to enter to execute the order of the Court. It was formerly considered an established principle, that the description of lands in an action of ejectment must be so certain as to enable the sheriff exactly to know, without any information from the lessor of the plaintiff, of what to deliver possession. That maxim has been abolished, and' it is now the practice for the sheriff to deliver possession of the premises recovered in that action, according to the directions of the claimant, who therein act's at his own peril. Adams on Eject. 23. But in a sale of land on execution, the case is different. The sheriff, at his own peril, must enter upon and sell the right- land.

The bill is defective in not describing by metes and bounds, by name, or otherwise, the premises to be sold; and the decree must for that reason be reversed.

*Per Curiam.*

The decree is reversed with costs. Cause remanded with leave to amend the bill.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

   CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
         1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Graham J. Orr, the Chief Financial Officer of Magna Entertainment Corp.
("MEC"), certify that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEC for the year ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEC.


/s/Graham J. Orr
Graham J. Orr
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 27, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Magna Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Magna
Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                        1
#### Draper et al., Appellants, *v.*Perry et al., Appellees. Draper et al., Appellees, *v.*Perry at al., Appellants.

(Nos. 6518 and 6519

Decided July 2, 1945.)

*341
      *Mr. Harry F. R. Dolan, Mr. Walter A. Briggs*and *Mr. Ray Hicks,*for Elsie Draper and Catherine S. Walker.

*Mr. Harry H. Baker*and *Mr. J. G. Williams,*for Dr. Prank Perry and Jessie Brown Perry.

By the Court.

At the time this action was instituted, the defendants were the *bona fide*owners of the real estate, the subject of this litigation. It was the claim of the plaintiffs that the grantor of the defendants’ deeds was incompetent. Plaintiffs failed to establish this in the trial court and"'have again failed to establish it in this court. The plaintiffs never had, therefore, any interest of any kind in the subject of this litigation. The appointment of the receiver was, therefore, in the nature of a wrongful attachment of the property of the defendants, and although the sums spent by the receiver in conserving the property may not be charged against the plaintiffs and should be allowed out of the sums collected by the receiver in the administration of such property, certainly, there can be no foundation for allowing the receiver compensation out of such receipts. His possession at all times was a violation of the rights of the defendants, who at all times were entitled to the undisturbed possession of such real estate.

The authorities relied on by the plaintiffs to sustain their contention that the compensation of the receiver should be paid.out of receipts from the property do not do so and are easily distinguished upon the facts involved.

The case of *Richey*v. *Brett, Recr.,*112 Ohio St., 582, 148 N. E., 92, cited by the plaintiffs, is an authority for the defendants, for at page 587 of the opinion it is stated:

> “Oases are found among the authorities' holding *342that, where the corpus is not available, and there has been an irregular or unauthorized appointment of a receiver, or where a party has received benefits from the receivership in excess of the amount required to be paid, or where an action has unjustly been maintained without right, in all such instances the plaintiffs in the action may be held personally responsible for deficiencies.”

Certainly, the instant action was maintained without right.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, in so far as it permits the assessment of the receiver’s compensation against the receipts from the administration of the property involved, is erroneous and should be modified to provide that such compensation shall be assessed as other costs against the plaintiffs. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Hildebrant, P. J., Matthews and Ross, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.224

$ 521,000.00                                                  New York, New York
                                                              August 19, 2002

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a California
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby unconditionally
PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor, New York,
NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may designate
from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America
and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Five Hundred Twenty
One Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($521,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest plus
3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                        Wilshire Technologies, Inc.



                                        By: /S/ Kathleen Terry
                                            ------------------
                                        Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

HOWARD OLIVER VOELTZ, JR.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STEVEN TURLEY,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-4215

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00559-DB)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion to withdraw the captioned appeal,

this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

A copy of this order will stand as the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-4215 Document: 01018377769 Date Filed: 03/04/2010 Page: 1
No. 14,091.

#### Kloster *v.*Elliott.

Landlord and *Tenant.*— Lease.—Construction *of.*— Gi'owing *Crop.*— Where a lease contained the following provision: “ And for the rental use of said farm, he, the said William Kloster, is to deliver at Bochester two-fifths of all crops grown on said farm to A. C. Elliott, including the present growing crop of clover-seed,” the lessor was entitled to the annual crop of clover then growing on the demised premises. •

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

*J. Rowley*and *M. A. Baker,*for appellant.

*G. W. Holman*and *R. C. Stephenson,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The question in this case depends entirely upon the meaning of a written contract to which the court gave a construction adverse to the contention of the appellant.

The contract is contained in a lease executed by the appellee as lessor, and the provisions of the instrument, so far as they are material, are these : “And for the rental use of *177said farm he, the said William Kloster, is to deliver at Rochester two-fifths of all crops grown on said farm to A. C. Elliott, including the present growing crop of clover seed.” Read in the light of attendant facts, we think there can be no doubt that the contract means, as the trial court held, that the lessor was entitled to the annual crop of clover then growing on the demised premises.

Filed April 8, 1890.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 5, 2004.

/s/ Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. ThoringtonChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### NUMBER 13

- 16

- 00 321

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E GULF MOVING SYSTEMS, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Per Curiam Order

Relator

, Gulf Moving Systems, Inc., f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the

above cause on June 15 , 2016

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator seek s to compel

the trial court to grant its plea to the jurisdic tion because the claims at issue in this case

fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of

Workers’ Compensation. T he Court requests that the real part y in interest

, Jose Maria

Morales Jr., or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought,

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days

from the date of this order. See id. R

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

1 6th day of June , 201 6

.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES H. PLANTE, JR.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.