alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State *v.*Maxwell.

*Wednesday, November*27.

An indictment for gaming need not state the name of the game played, nor the name of the person with whom the bet was made — his name being alleged to be unknown.

ERROR to the *Warren*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

Indictment for gaming. The. first count in the indictment charges, that the defendant did unlawfully win, of and from a person whose name is unknown 'to the jurors, the sum of twenty-five cents by then and there betting at and upon an unlawful game at and with cards, &c. The second count charges the defendant with losing twenty-five cents by betting, *&cc.,*as in the first count.

The Court on the motion .of the defendant quashed the indictment; and this writ of error is prosecuted to reverse that judgment.

The indictment is said to be defective, because it does not specify the particular game at. which the money was lost and won. That point has been settled by this Court. In the case of *The State*v. *Bougher,*3 Blackf. 307, it was decided that in an indictment for this offence, it is not necessary to state the particular game played.

Another objection taken to the indictment is, that the name of the person with whom the bet was made is not given. This objection is not tenable. There are cases in which the name of a third person cannot be ascertained, and in any such case it is sufficient to state, that such person was to the jurors unknown. 1 Chitt. Cr. Law, 213. An indictment for the murder of a person unknown is good, so for an assault on one unknown, and if the defendant be acquitted or con*231victed, and be afterwards indicted for an assault or murder of a person by name, he may plead the former conviction or acquittal, and aver it to be the same person. 2 Hale’s PI. Cr. 181. An indictment for selling beer to divers persons unknown, in unlawful measures, was held to be good. *Rex*v. *Gibbs,*1 Str. 497. The Court said the indictment was well enough; the informer may not know the name of the person to whom it was sold ; .and it was an offence to whomsoever sold. .There is no reason why the above principle should not apply to the case before us (1).

*W. J. Peaslee,*for the state.

*A. S. White*and *R. A. Lockwood,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

.The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 Accord. *Butler*v. *The State, May*term, 1840.
# Dina Contella, ISS Program Operations Integration Manager

Dina Contella is presently serving as the International Space Station (ISS) Program Operations Integration Manager. In this role, she is responsible for the overall management and integration of ISS Program operational elements, with the primary focus on supporting the performance of real-time and near real-time missions. As Chair of the ISS Mission Management Team (IMMT), Contella is responsible for all aspects of the execution of on-orbit program activities for the integrated ISS. She reports to the ISS Program Manager.

Contella brings more than 30 years of experience to the position, having served in various roles for NASA’s International Space Station and Artemis programs over the course of her career. She most recently served as the Operations Integration and Utilization Manager in NASA’s Gateway Program and as the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) lead for Utilization and Logistics. 

Prior to her assignment with the Gateway Program, Contella was on rotation to the ISS Program to lead an industry study effort to further NASA’s understanding of low-Earth orbit commercialization.

Contella was a Flight Director in the Flight Operations Directorate for nine years, leading several significant operations including Lead Flight Director for Expeditions 32 and 47.

Prior to becoming a Flight Director, she was an Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Space Shuttle and ISS flight controller/instructor and later became the EVA Task Group Lead.  During her time in EVA, she led nine ISS assembly EVAs and was an EVA liaison to Russia.  

In addition to many other awards over her career, Ms. Contella has earned an Exceptional Leadership Medal, three NASA Exceptional Service Medals, a Silver Achievement Medal, a Space Flight Awareness Award, and a Silver Snoopy. 

She was appointed ISS Program Operations Integration Manager on Nov. 23, 2021. Contella holds a bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University.
# Portrait – Gemini 11 – Prime and Backup Crews

S66-50772 (7 Sept. 1966) --- The Gemini-Titan XI (GT-11) prime and backup crews pose for a group portrait. Seated is the prime crew, astronauts Charles Conrad Jr. (right), command pilot, and Richard F. Gordon Jr. (left), pilot. The backup crew (standing) is astronauts Neil A. Armstrong (right), command pilot, and William A. Anders (left), pilot. The two crews were suited up for a simulation test at the Kennedy Space Center. Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s66-50772/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJanuary 1, 1966ProducerJSCSize1276x1920pxPIA NumberS66-50772The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 29, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=729
1 min read

# Utilization of Self-Healing Materials in Thermal Protection System Applications

### Loura Hall

Jul 19, 2016

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Nathaniel Skolnik***University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign*

The proposed project is the Utilization of Self-Healing Materials for Thermal Protection System (TPS) Applications. Currently, the technology for repairing TPS from micro meteor and orbital debris impact damage has a low Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 2 and there are no repair materials currently available for use. This project plans to raise this TRL by integrating self-healing technology into existing TPS materials. In order to raise the TRL, self-healing TPS needs to be demonstrated at significantly higher temperatures than have been previously demonstrated. The proposed plan for advancing self-healing TPS consists of four stages: manufacturing, thermal testing, self-healing testing, and thermal testing of healed samples. Placing the material in arc jets with relevant reentry environments will test the thermal response of the material. Impacting or damaging the integrated material will test self-healing properties. After performing this research, self-healing TPS will be ready for testing in relevant space environments by measuring material responses in vacuum and at extreme varying temperatures. Visiting NASA centers will make this project successful by allowing access to NASA labs, equipment, and technology experts.

**Back to NSTRF 2016 Full List**
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00497

- CR

IN RE Juan Robert RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Ka ren Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on August 8 , 2016, complaining that the

trial court had not ruled on a motion nunc pro tunc filed by Relator. On September 20 , 2016,

Respondent signed an order denying the motion nunc pro tunc

. Because the trial court has ruled

on the motion, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered moot. Accordingly,

this original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Relator’s motion to compel

disc overy is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on October 12, 2016

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREO F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of October, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1990CR1294, styled State of Texas v. Juan Robert Rodriguez , pending in

the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell presiding.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FullHouse Resorts, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report’), I, Andre M. Hilliou, ChiefExecutive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2004 | By     | :  /s/ ANDRE  M. HILLIOU | . |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|---|--------|
|                |   | Andre M. Hilliou              |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FullHouse Resorts, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Greg Violette, ChiefFinancial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2004 | By     | : /s/ GREG VIOLETTE     | . |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|---|--------|
|                |   | Greg Violette           |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

June 13, 2012

No. 11-1654

MICHAEL ALEXANDER NELSON, 

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED 

STATES, Respondent

(Agency No. A044-843-940)

Present: VANASKIE, BARRY and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges

Motion by Respondent to Publish the Opinion Dated 05/22/2012.

Respectfully, 

Clerk/pdb for smw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ 

The foregoing motion is GRANTED

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated: July 10, 2012

Smw/cc: Jeffrey L. Menkin, Esq.

Kristen Sawicki, Esq.

Richard H. Frankel, Esq.

Jonathan O'Boyle, Esq.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday, November 26, 2010.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance and enforcement matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-27324 Filed 10-25-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          22,006
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                22,006
<PP&E>                                                           4,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   2,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           88,525
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                        15,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (80,017)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  (64,478)
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              466,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (464,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (464,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (464,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (.04)



</TABLE>
- Armstrong Home
- About Armstrong   - Overview
  - Doing Business with Armstrong
  - Employee Alerts
  - History
  - Leadership/Organizations
  - Media Resources
  - People
  - Strategic Plan
  - Virtual Tour
- Programs & Projects   - Overview
  - Advanced Air Mobility
  - Flight Opportunities
  - Quesst
  - Sustainable Flight Demonstrator
  - Aeronautics Projects
  - Science Projects
  - Space Projects
- Capabilities   - Overview
  - Aircraft Flown at Armstrong
  - Dryden Aeronautical Test Range
  - Flight Loads Laboratory
  - Flight Operations
  - Mission Operations
  - Research & Engineering
  - Technology Development
- Multimedia   - All Armstrong Images
  - NASA Image and Video Library
  - Image Galleries A-Z
  - Videos

## X-Press

In the June X-Press learn how the X-57 aircraft creates paths for electric aviation, the number designated for NASA’s new X-plane, and a simulator designed to access the ride quality of future air taxis.
				Read the June Newsletter                                     about X-Press

## Featured X-Press Articles

				All Armstrong News                			

Article3 min readNASA’s Chase Aircraft Gets a FaceliftArticle4 min readNASA Armstrong Tests Model of Efficient WingArticle4 min readHollywood, NASA Armstrong Value Flight Safety

## 				Explore More			

## X-Press Archives

Read X-Press publications dating back to 2008.

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Armstrong Aeronautics Projects

Armstrong Science Projects

Armstrong Space Projects

Armstrong Technologies
No. 118.

#### Alexander Thompson, plaintiff in error, vs. Joseph R. Richards *et al.*defendants.

[1.] The deed of a person to land, where there is adverse possession held by another, being void under the 32 *Henry VIII.*doesjgot preclude the grantee from maintaining an action of ejectment in the name of the grantor, to-recover possession of the premises.

[2.] A demurrer will lie to a bill, where there is an ample Oommon Law remedy.

In Equity, in Carroll Superior Court. Decision by Judge* Bull, February Term, 1856.

This was a bill filed by Thompson, setting forth that in Feb. 1858, an action of ejectment was commenced against him,. on the several demises of William, Peter and John Manley, heirs at law of Wm. Manley, dec’d, and of J. R. Richards and of John and B. M. Long, to recover a certain lot of land, which action is still pending, one verdict having been rendered for plaintiffs for three-fourths of said lot; that plaintiffs showed a grant from the State to the Manleys ; a deed from them to Richards, and from him to the Longs; that complainant holds under a deed from Samnel Bowlin,., dated in 1850; that Bowlin had been in possession under color of title since 1841; and those under whom he claimed, since 1881; that Bowlin, while in possession, had sometimes said, while drunk, that he did not claim the land, which raised a doubt concerning complainants’ title; that he bought in. good faith, believing the title to he good; that the conveyance of the land from the Manleys to Richards, and from. *595Richards to the Longs, were made while complainant was in •adverse possession of the land, and had been for more than a .year previous, of which the said Longs had full knowledge, and which complainants cannot show their knowledge of, but by a resort to their consciences; that the Manleys and Richards had no knowledge of the bringing of the ejectment suit, but that the same is proceeding for the sole benefit of the •Longs. The complainant therefore charged that the deed to said Richards and the Longs is void in law; and ho prays a perpetual injunction against said ejectment.

The bill was demurred to on the two grounds, of a want of equity, and that there was an adequate Common Law remedy. The Court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the bill, and on this decision error is assigned.

Powell, for plaintiff in error.

'Wright, for defendants.

*By the Court.*

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] This case was before this Court at Decatur, August, 1854, (16 *Ga. R.*440,) and we held there was no equity iii the bill. It presents no new feature. We see, therefore, no reason to over-rule the decision then made.

[2.] It is straining pretty hard, perhaps; to' adopt the' 32 *Henry VIII.*in a new country like this has been; and we feel no disposition to relax the rule which allows the grantee, whose deed is made void by that Statute, to use the name of ■his grantor to recover the premises.
EXHIBIT 99.1

[Crusade Management Logo]

Crusade Management Limited
ACN 072 715 916
Level 11, 55 Market Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Telephone (02) 9320-5555
Facsimile (02) 9320-5586




                           CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

         The  undersigned  officer  of  Crusade  Management  Limited,  a company
organized under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby certifies
on behalf of CML and on his own behalf for purposes of the Crusade  Global Trust
No. 2 of 2001 Class A Mortgage  Backed  Floating  Rate Notes (the  "Notes"),  as
follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and


     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied
           with all conditions and covenants under the Transaction Documents,
           for the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2001 issue of Notes for
           the period between September 5, 2001 and the end of the Manager's
           fiscal year on September 30, 2001.

         Capitalized  terms used and not defined  herein shall have the meanings
assigned  to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced
issue of Notes.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 25, 2002.



                                                     /S/  G.M.Bartlett

                                                     By:     G.M. Bartlett
                                                     Title:  Director
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Stonepath Group, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 15,    2004 |  By: /s/ Dennis    L. Pelino       |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    |                                         |
|                    | Dennis    L. Pelino                     |
|                    | Chairman and Chief    Executive Officer |

     This    certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject    to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose.It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Stonepath Group, Inc. and will be retained by Stonepath Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

84

----