alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-26713 Filed 10-19-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
#### James M. Munro v. Anna L. Edwards.

[See 86 Midi. 91.]

*Contract for sale of land*— Specific *performance*— Bight *of possession.*

Upon a rehearing of this case, the decree ordered on the first hearing is modified so as to entitle the complainant to the possession of the land upon payment, within 60 days from July 28, 1891, of the balance of the purchase price, less the amount of the mortgage, the payment of which he assumed, with interest from said date.

Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.)

Reargued July 2, 1881.

Decided July 28, 1891.

Bill for the specific performance óf a contract for the sale of land.

Decree ordered on former hearing modified as stated in head-note;

The facts are stated in the former opinion.

*Eaug S TerTces,*for complainant.

*Alex. D. Fowler,*for defendant.

McGrath, J.

The question as to whether or not com- ' plainant is entitled to possession under the contract before the payment of the balance of the purchase price-*113is not free from doubt, but on rehearing complainant proffers payment of such balance, and. I think that the decree heretofore ordered by this Court may be so far modified as to entitle complainant to possession upon payment, within 60 days from the date hereof, of the balance of said purchase price, less the amount of the mortgage upon said premises, with interest from the date hereof.

Morse, Lono, and Grant, JJ., concurred.
---





# NASA History

Office







|seal of the president of the united states | Report of the

            

            PRESIDENTIAL

            

            COMMISSION

            

            on the Space Shuttle

            

            Challenger

            Accident

            

            June 6th, 1986

            

            Washington, D.C.                                                         
|------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|.                                         
|+                                         
|.                                         
|NASA logo                                  | Report to the

            President

            

            IMPLEMENTATION

            

            OF THE

            RECOMMENDATIONS

            

            of the Presidential

            Commission

            

            on the Space

            Shuttle

            

            Challenger

            AccidentJune 1987











Updated: December 8, 2010



For further information E-mailhistinfo@hq.nasa.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,910]

                    By application sent to this office on March 19, 2010, the United Steel Workers, Local 1-109, requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Notice of determination was issued on February 18, 2010, and was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 12, 2010 (75 FR 11925). The workers produce trailer axels.                

The negative determination was based on the findings that, during the relevant period, there was no increase in imports of articles like or directly competitive with the trailer axles produced by the subject firm, and no shift to/acquisition from a foreign country by the subject firm of articles like or directly competitive with trailer axles. The investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not supply a component part to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA and directly incorporated the component part into the finished article that was the basis for the TAA certification.

The request for reconsideration alleges that the subject firm used to manufacture “drive axels housings, steering arms, brake shoes and many other components in the heavy truck industry” in addition to trailer axels.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-26896 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# STS-81

This is a view of the Russian Mir Space Station photographed by a crewmember of the fifth Shuttle/Mir docking mission,...

Like a rising sun lighting up the night, the Space Shuttle Atlantis soars from Launch Pad 39B at 4:27:23 a.m....

Greeted by cheers from wellwishers at KSC and eager for their venture into space on the fifth Shuttle-Mir docking mission,...

STS081-E-05126 (13 Jan. 1997) --- Astronaut Michael A. Baker, mission commander, uses a 35mm camera to photograph a target of...

STS081-E-05535 (17 Jan. 1997) --- Seven NASA astronauts and two Russian cosmonauts take a break from busy supply-transfer duties on...

STS081-343-014 (12-22 Jan. 1997) --- Oranges and grapefruit brought up from Earth get a popular reception by the Mir-22 crewmembers....

STS081-308-032 (12-22 Jan. 1997) --- Astronaut Marsha S. Ivins appears almost lost among the bags of material to be brought...

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- The Space Shuttle orbiter Atlantis touches down on Runway 33 at 9:22:44 a.m. EST Jan....

S96-15405 (26 Sept. 1996) --- In the Johnson Space Center's weightless environment training facility, astronaut Marsha S. Ivins, STS-81 mission...

S97-00252 (15 Dec. 1996) --- Astronaut Brent W. Jett Jr., STS-81 pilot, arrives in a NASA T-38 jet trainer at...

STS081-E-05504 (16 Jan. 1997) --- Astronaut John E. Blaha re-unites with the familiar surroundings of the Space Shuttle Atlantis' aft...

STS081-338-037 (12-22 Jan. 1997) --- Astronaut Michael A. Baker, STS-81 commander, mans the commander's station on the Space Shuttle Atlantis'...
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1657
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Medina International Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB (the  "Report") for the period ending April 30,
2008 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report").  I, Madhava Rao Mankal,  Chief Financial Officer of the company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                    --------------------------------
                                   Madhava Rao Mankal,  Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 14, 2008
Tracking Number: 2010~04-06 (EC-02) 

Invite International Partners to Contribute to all Aspects of the Exploration Architecture 

NASA Recommendation: 

The NAC recommends that NASA pursue a policy that, considering the U.S. space industrial 

base and broad national security interests, invites potential partners to contribute to all aspects 

ofthe exploration architecture. Iri the exceptional case, where appropriate, partnerships on the 

critical path elements ofthe deep space transportation system should be considered. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with the recommendation. NASA has established a number ofmechanisms and 

processes to ensure the broadest engagement with potential international partners in human and 

robotic exploration. A variety of bilateral activities with multiple key space agencies have taken 

place or are ongoing, including basic information exchange, joint architecture studies and 

international collaboration involving robotic analogue, and flight precursor mission cooperation. 

In parallel, NASA is heavily engaged through the I4-agency International Space Exploration 

Coordination Group (ISECG) in a number of activities that are laying the groundwork for broad 

space exploration cooperation. Through ISECG, NASA led a multilateral I8-month study which 

culminated in the June 2010 release of a global lunar reference architecture. NASA is currently 

co~leading with the European Space Agency the development of a Global Exploration Roadmap 

which is intended to assist individual space agencies in planning for collaborative exploration 

opportunities. We feel that these processes and tools are well suited to inform both NASA and 

the international community ofthe most advantageous partnership opportunities, including 

potentially significant critical path contributions.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

RANDY LEE TURNER

NO. 2022 KW 0367

AUGUST 2, 2022

In Re: Randy Lee Turner, applying for supervisory writs, 32nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

717, 086. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

01- gj

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 5116** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SASAN GHAZAL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distri ct of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr - 00053

- RJC

- 1 )

Submitted : September 12, 2011 Decided: September 14, 2011

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part, v acated in part, and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Claire J. Rauscher, Ann Loraine Hester, Rahwa Gebre

- Egziabher, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Charl otte, North Carolina; Amy E
. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sasan Ghazal appeals his thirty

- three month sentence for possession of a pipe bomb in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(c), (d), (i), 5871 (2006). Ghazal argues that his sentence was procedurally unreasonable because the district court erred in calculating his Guidelines sentence by finding that he was a “prohibited p erson” for purposes of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B) (2008). A sentence is procedurally unreasonable if the district court improperly calculated the offender’s Guidelines range of imprisonment. United States v. Boulware , 604 F.3d 832, 837

- 38 (4th Cir. 2010). Ghazal claims that he was not a “prohibited person” for purposes of USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B) because he had not been previously convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding a year. Ghazal’s criminal history disclosed a 2006 North Carolina conviction for possession of ecstasy, but, under North Carolina’s structured sentencing regime, Ghazal could not have received a custodial sentence of more than a year given his criminal history. When Ghazal raised this argument in the district court, it was foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Harp , 406 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2005). Subsequently, however, we overruled Harp with our en banc decision in United States v. Simmons , __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 3607266 (4th Cir.3 Aug. 17, 2011) (en banc). P ursuant to the dictates of Simmons , we sustain Ghazal’s objection her e. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed as to the unchallenged conviction, vacated as to the sentence, and the case is remanded for res entencing . We deny Ghazal’s pending motion to file a supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART, V

ACATED IN PART , AND REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,296
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,883
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,403
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     77,676
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             486
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               469
<LOANS>                                        328,411
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,479
<DEPOSITS>                                     379,639
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,989
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,427
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 446,479
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,441
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,720
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   931
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,092
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,513
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,579
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,825
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,876
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,876
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Document

EXHIBIT 10.6
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”), dated as of March 26, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) is entered into by and between T-Mobile US, Inc. (the “Company”), and G. Michael Sievert (“Executive”).  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).  
RECITALS
        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2019 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), which sets forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; 
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2018, the Company, Sprint Corporation and certain other parties named therein entered into a business combination agreement (such agreement, as amended from time to time, the “BCA”, and the closing of the transactions contemplated under the BCA, the “Closing”); and
        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive mutually desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Executive’s continued service with the Company, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, effective as of the Effective Date, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:
AMENDMENT
1.The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide that the “CEO Start Date” means the earlier of (i) immediately following the Closing on the date on which the Closing occurs or (ii) April 30, 2020.  
2.This First Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the Employment Agreement.   
3.Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)


1













        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this First Amendment effective as of the date first above written.




COMPANY
T-Mobile US, Inc.






/s/ Kelvin R. Westbrook   
Kelvin R. Westbrook
Chair, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors






EXECUTIVE




/s/ G. Michael Sievert   
G. Michael Sievert








(Signature Page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals to change the community of license: GRACE PUBLIC RADIO, Station KFKB, Facility ID 174471, BMPED-20100803AAM, From GIRARD, KS, To LA HARPE, KS; LORENZ E. PROIETTI, Station KMQS, Facility ID 166044, BPH-20100104AAK, From WHEATLAND, WY, To THE BUTTES, WY; NETWORK OF GLORY, INC., Station WJGS, Facility ID 172173, BMPED-20101012ACO, From THOMSON, GA, To NORWOOD, GA; NORTH AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Station WTDA, Facility ID 60099, BPH-20101004ACN, From WESTERVILLE, OH, To RIVERLEA, OH; SAN JOAQUIN BROADCASTING CO., Station KLVS, Facility ID 69685, BPH-20100915ABK, From STOCKTON, CA, To LIVERMORE, CA; SIERRA RADIO, INC., Station KVXX, Facility ID 31618, BPH-20101004ACX, From QUINCY, CA, To MAGALIA, CA; WIRELESS FIDELITY OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Station WGUY, Facility ID 160465, BMP-20100927AAA, From ELLSWORTH, ME, To VEAZIE, ME.

# DATES:

Comments may be filed through December 27, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tung Bui, 202-418-2700.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The full text of these applications is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 or electronically via the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base System,                     *http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/​prod/​cdbs/​pubacc/​prod/​cdbs_​pa.htm.*                     A copy of this application may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *http://www.BCPIWEB.com.*

Federal Communications Commission.

James D. Bradshaw,

Deputy Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2010-27209 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P