alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hurst *v.*Purvis and Another.—In error.

Saturday, *May*29.

COVENANT. The facts alleged in the declaration were substantially as follows: The parties entered into a sealed agreement on the 12th of September, 1838; according to which, the plaintiff sold certain cattle to the defendants, to be delivered to them at the plaintiff’s farm in *Wayne*county on or before the first of *December*then following; for which cattle the defendants were to pay the plaintiff a certain price at the time of delivery. The plaintiff had the cattle at the time and place ready to be delivered, and actually set them apart for the defendants; but the defendants did not attend to receive them. The plaintiff continued to keep the cattle, so set apart, ready at the place for the defendants until the 8th of the same December, when the defendants, having the day before paid a part of the price, came and accepted the cattle from the plaintiff as a compliance with his part of the contract, and converted them to their own use. The defendants have not paid, &c.

Pleas, 1. The cattle were not delivered on or before the first of December, 1838. 2. The defendants did not accept the cattle on or before the first of December, 1838. 3. Accord and satisfaction, by the delivery and acceptance of a promissory note executed by the defendants and others, in satisfaction, &c. Replication to the third plea, consisting of various matters of evidence tending to show that the plea was not true, and concluding as follows, “and so the note was not accepted in satisfaction,” &c.

Held, that the replication to the third plea was bad on special demurrer, being argumentative, &c. Held, also, that the first and second pleas were bad, and the declaration good, on general demurrer.
camp-ex1038_250.htm



Exhibit 10.38

 

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This amendment (the “Amendment”) is made as of and effective this 31st day of May 2018, between CalAmp Corp. (the “Company”) and Kurt Binder (“Employee”).

 

RECITALS:

 

A.The Company and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement originally dated as of July 27, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Employee is employed by the Company.

 

B.The Company and Employee desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the respective covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
In accordance with Section 1(e) and Section 9(f) of the Employment Agreement, the Employment Agreement is hereby further amended by this Amendment to extend the term for a period of two years, through May 31, 2020.
	
 




 


	
 
	
2.
	
Except as otherwise amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
	
 




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

 


	
	
/s/ Kurtis J. Binder

	
Kurtis J. Binder




 

 

CALAMP CORP.

 


	
	
/s/ Michael Burdiek

	
By: Michael Burdiek

President & CEO
2 min read

# Hubble Provides Unique Ultraviolet View of Jupiter

### NASA Hubble Mission Team

#### Goddard Space Flight Center

Nov 03, 2023

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

This newly released image from the NASA Hubble Space Telescope shows the planet Jupiter in a color composite of ultraviolet wavelengths. Released in honor of Jupiter reaching opposition, which occurs when the planet and the Sun are in opposite sides of the sky, this view of the gas giant planet includes the iconic, massive storm called the “Great Red Spot.” Though the storm appears red to the human eye, in this ultraviolet image it appears darker because high altitude haze particles absorb light at these wavelengths. The reddish, wavy polar hazes are absorbing slightly less of this light due to differences in either particle size, composition, or altitude. 

The data used to create this ultraviolet image is part of a Hubble proposal that looked at Jupiter’s stealthy superstorm system. The researchers plan to map deep water clouds using the Hubble data to define 3D cloud structures in Jupiter’s atmosphere.

Hubble has a long history of observing the outer planets. From the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts to studying Jupiter’s storms, Hubble’s decades-long career and unique vantage point provide astronomers with valuable data to chart the evolution of this dynamic planet.

Hubble’s ultraviolet-observing capabilities allow astronomers to study the short, high-energy wavelengths of light beyond what the human eye can see. Ultraviolet light reveals fascinating cosmic phenomena, including light from the hottest and youngest stars embedded in local galaxies; the composition, densities, and temperatures of the material between stars; and the evolution of galaxies.

This is a false-color image because the human eye cannot detect ultraviolet light. Therefore, colors in the visible light spectrum were assigned to the images, each taken with a different ultraviolet filter. In this case, the assigned colors for each filter are: Blue: F225W, Green: F275W, and Red: F343N.

***Media Contact:***

***Claire Andreoli******NASA’s ******Goddard Space Flight Center***, ***Greenbelt, MD******claire.andreoli@nasa.gov***
Exhibit 32.3





Certification of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: September 9, 2010





/s/ Brian W. WhiteBrian W. WhiteChief Financial Officer
2 min read

# NASA’s SpaceX Crew-5 to Discuss Mission, Splashdown from Space

### Abbey A. Donaldson

Feb 27, 2023

MEDIA ADVISORYM23-021

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA’s SpaceX Crew-5 will answer media questions at 12:30 p.m. EST Wednesday, March 1, about their time aboard the International Space Station. The event takes place prior to their return to Earth later this month.

NASA astronauts Nicole Mann and Josh Cassada as well as JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Koichi Wakata and Roscosmos cosmonaut Anna Kikina will participate in the news conference from orbit. The event will air on NASA Television, the NASA app, and the agency’s website at:

www.nasa.gov/live

Interested media must contact the newsroom at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, Feb. 28, by calling 281-483-5111 or emailing jsccommu@mail.nasa.gov. To ask questions, reporters must dial into the news conference no later than 12:15 p.m. Questions may also be submitted on social media using #AskNASA.

The Crew-5 astronauts have been living and working aboard the station since their docking Oct. 6, 2022. During their mission, the crew contributed to hundreds of experiments and technology demonstrations, including cardiovascular health, bioprinting, and fluid behavior in microgravity to prepare for human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit and to benefit life on Earth.

The SpaceX Dragon Endurance spacecraft will undock from the space station in early March, splashing down off the coast of Florida to conclude their mission.

Crew-5 is the fifth crew rotation mission with SpaceX for the agency’s Commercial Crew Program. Regular commercial crew rotation missions enable NASA to continue the important research and technology investigations taking place aboard the station. Such research benefits people on Earth and lays the groundwork for future human exploration through the agency’s Artemis missions, which will send astronauts to the Moon to prepare for future expeditions to Mars.

Follow Mann and Wakata on Twitter, and learn more about their scientific journey and download images and video on NASA’s website.

Follow updates on the Crew-5 mission at:

**https://www.nasa.gov/station**

-end-

Joshua FinchHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100joshua.a.finch@nasa.gov

Dan HuotJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111daniel.g.huot@nasa.gov

Joshua FinchHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1100joshua.a.finch@nasa.govDan HuotJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111daniel.g.huot@nasa.gov
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**      The Board of Directors    Huttig Building Products, Inc.:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statement Nos.    333-92495,333-92497,333-92499,333-75610,333-81410,333-131090,    and    333-145151    on    Form S-8    and registration statement    No. 333-130525    on    Form S-3    of Huttig Building Products, Inc. of our reports dated    February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance    sheets of Huttig Building Products, Inc. as of December 31,    2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of    operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each    of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,    2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial    reporting as of December 31, 2007, which report appears in    the December 31, 2007 annual report on    Form 10-K    of Huttig Building Products, Inc. /s/  KPMG    LLP     St. Louis, Missouri    February 29, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# Time and Date:

October 27, 2010-10 a.m.

# Place:

800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# Status:

Part of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

# Matters to be Considered:

## Open Session

1. Staff Briefing on the 2010 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation—33rd Transportation Working Group Meeting.

2. Commission Review of the Impact of the European Union Repeal of the Liner Conference Block Exemption—Staff Recommendation and Draft Notice of Inquiry.

## Closed Session

1. Staff Briefing on Reporting Requirement Options for Global Vessel Alliances.

2. Staff Briefing on Semi-Annual Meeting with the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 011223.

3. Staff Briefing Regarding China Maritime Regulatory Issues.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-26992 Filed 10-21-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1667 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1667

   To exempt small trailer manufacturers from enhanced early warning 
  reporting requirements under the Transportation Recall Enhancement, 
             Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2003

 Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Nickles) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt small trailer manufacturers from enhanced early warning 
  reporting requirements under the Transportation Recall Enhancement, 
             Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WEIGHT EXEMPTION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF TRAILER 
              MANUFACTURERS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
early warning reporting requirements under section 30166(m) of title 
49, United States Code, manufacturers of trailers with a gross vehicle 
weight rating of 26,000 pounds or less shall not, with respect to such 
trailers, be subject to the additional reporting requirements under 
section 579.24 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, that are 
applicable to manufacturers that produce, import, offer for sale, or 
sell 500 or more vehicles during the calendar year of a reporting 
period or during each of the prior two calendar years.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dixon *v.*Doe, on the Demise of Lasselle.

Thursday, *May*23.

A Circuit Court may adopt a scrawl as the seal of the Court.

A sheriff’s deed is good against the execution-defendant and his heirs or devisees, though it be not acknowledged or recorded.

If a deed regularly recorded be relied on by a person not a party to it, the record book is admissible to prove the contents of the deed.

ERROR to the *Wabash*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Ejectment for three lots of ground in the *107town of Wabash. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The lessor of the plaintiff had purchased the lots in question at sheriff’s sale. The plaintiff proved the judgment against the execution-defendant. He then offered in evidence the execution. The only seal on the execution was a scrawl with the words, “ Indiana, *Wabash*Circuit Court,” written within it. It was proved that the Court had adopted this form of a sealj and had caused a description of it to be recorded. This was done in order to comply with the statute, which requires every Circuit Court to have a seal devised by the Court, and to have its description recorded. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 138.

The execution was objected to as evidence, on the ground that the scrawl affixed to it was not a seal, but the objection was overruled. This objection would, no doubt, be good at common law. *Warren*v. Lynch, *5*Johns. Rep. 239. We have, however, a statute which provides that all instruments of writing, to which by law or the agreement of the parties a seal is necessary, may .be sealed with a scrawl. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 407. We think that the Court was authorised by this statute to adopt a scrawl as a seal, and that the execution before us, with the scrawl so adopted attached to it, was legally sealed. The objection to the execution, therefore, is not sustainable.

The sheriff’s deeds to the lessor for the premises, were offered in evidence and objected to. Their execution was proved by the subscribing witnesses ; and the only ground for the objection to them was, that the acknowledgments indorsed on them were not proved. This objection was correctly overruled. A sheriff’s deed is good against the execution-defendant and his heirs or devisees, though it be not acknowledged or recorded.

The plaintiff offered to prove, by the record'book of deeds of the county, the contents of a deed for the premises from a third person to the execution-defendant, without proving the execution of the original deed, or accounting for its absence. This evidence was objected to, but the objection was overruled. As the conveyance was not made to the lessor of *108the plaintiff, and could not be presumed to be under his control, the record book was admissible evidence of the contents of the conveyance. *Bowser*v. Warren, 4 Blackf. 522. There was no error, therefore, in overruling the objection to this evidence.

*H.*Cooper, for the plaintiff.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE R. SILVERS.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14a/ 15d-14a
I, Henry Linsert, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Martek BiosciencesCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 16, 2004
/s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.
Henry Linsert, Jr.
# Cassini Closes in on Saturn

In this May 15, 2004 image, dark regions represent areas where Cassini is seeing into deeper levels in Saturn's atmosphere. The dark regions are relatively free of high clouds and the light at these particular near-infrared wavelengths penetrates into the gaseous cloud-free atmosphere and is absorbed by methane.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/cassini-closes-saturn/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1024x1024pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT #1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment #1 ("Amendment #1") to the Employment Agreement, entered into as of May 29, 2018 and effective as of May 31, 2018 (the "Agreement"), by and between Avid Technology, Inc. ("Avid") and Jason Duva ("Executive") is effective as of April 1, 2020 ("Amendment Effective Date").


WHEREAS, due to the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on the economy and on Avid's current financial situation, and the implications to the organization if the COVID-19 situation continues without intervention, the parties agree to the necessity of certain cost saving measures, including the temporary reduction of certain employees' salaries; and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment #1.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


		
	1.
	As of the Amendment Effective Date, Executive agrees to a temporary twenty-three percent (23%) reduction to Executive's base salary as paid to Executive immediately prior to the Amendment Effective Date. Such reduction in salary shall subsist for a minimum period of three (3) months from the Amendment Effective Date, and for so long as Avid maintains its COVID-19-related furlough program.




		
	2.
	Other than for the purposes of the amendment set forth in §1 above, the defined term "Base Salary" shall continue to mean the salary amount paid to Executive immediately prior to the Amendment Effective Date, and shall not refer to the temporary reduced salary brought about by this Amendment #1.




		
	3.
	Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment #1, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties.




		
	4.
	Counterparts and Signature. This Amendment #1 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This amendment may be executed by electronic signature or by scanning the executed document for electronic transmittal.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement on the date above written.


	
			
	Executive
	 
	Avid Technology, Inc.

	Isl Jason Duva
	 
	Isl Diana Brunelle

	Signature
	 
	Signature

	 
	 
	 

	Jason Duva
	 
	Diana Brunelle

	Printed Name
	 
	Printed Name

	 
	 
	 

	Chief Legal and Administrative Officer & Executive Vice President
	 
	Chief Human Resources Officer & SVP

	Title
	 
	Title

	 
	 
	 

	April 29, 2020
	 
	April 29, 2020

	Date
	 
	Date