alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald R. Spoehel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.



Date: August 16, 2004



|       |  |                                                                          
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    George J. Pedersen                                                
|Name:  |  | George J. Pedersen                                                       
|Title: |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    Ronald R. Spoehel                                                 
|Name:  |  | Ronald R. Spoehel                                                        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
#### Alice B. Bahan v. Herbert E. Turnbull.

*Fraud*— Cancellation *of deed.*

In this case the Court find, .from the testimony, that the complainant was deceived *by*false representations and by the falsification of the abstract of title of the land taken in exchange for the land conveyed by her to the defendant, and the decree of the court below, setting aside her deed, is affirmed. The questions involved are purely questions of fact.

Appeal ' from Wayne. (Beilly, J.)

Argued May 19, 1891.

Decided June 5, 1891.

Bill to set aside a deed. Defendant appeals.

Decree affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Jay Fuller,*for complainant.

*E. H. Sellers,*for defendant.

Champlin, C. J.

The complainant filed her bill of complaint in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, in chancery, where she obtained a decree declaring that the deed executed^ by Alice B. Bahan to Herbert E. Turnbull of the premises described in the bill of complaint as lot No. 17, of outlot No. 25, Labrosse farm, is fraudulent and void; said deed bearing date April 9, 1889, and recorded in the office of the register of deeds in Liber 338 of Deeds, on page 213. From this decree the defendant appeals. • ■

The record contains over 400 printed pages, and the questions involved are purely questions of fact. We have carefully scrutinized the testimony, and are clearly of the opinion that the conclusions reached by the circuit court are correct, and ought to be affirmed. It would serve no *348useful purpose to restate the testimony upon which we are forced to the conviction that the complainant was deceived by false representations and falsification of the abstract of title of the land taken in exchange for the land conveyed by the deed executed by complainant to defendant.

It is sufficient to say that the complainant made out a plain case for the relief prayed for, and the decree is affirmed, with costs.

Morse, Long, and Grant, JJ., concurred. McGrath, J., did not sit.
#### Beach et al., Appellees, *v.*Rowekamp et al., Appellants.

(No. 157

Decided October 22, 1943.)

*252*Messrs. Nichols, Speidel <& Nichols,*for appellees.

*Mr. Charles E. Dornette*and *Mr. Harry Britton,*for appellants.

Hildebrant, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the granting of an injunction against the violation of certain building restrictions contained in the recorded plat and the various deeds pertaining to a residential allotment.

On motion to dismiss the appeal, the record reveals the following:

The opinion of the trial court was filed on March 18, 1943.

The judgment entry was filed April 8, 1943.

A motion for new trial was filed on April 10, 1943.

An entry overruling the motion for a new trial was filed on May 25, 1943; the order overruling such motion having been actually made on May 24, 1943.

The notice of appeal was filed June 1, 1943. It is as follows:

“Now come Harry L. Rowekamp and Edna Rowekamp, defendants-appellants and give notice of appeal from the judgment and final order made herein on May 24, 1943.

“Said appeal is on the question of law.”

"The motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained without extended discussion, since it is apparent the instant appeal is-attempted from the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which is not a final order. A specific entry of specific date being referred to in the notice of appeal, this court will not indulge the presumption that appellants intended to appeal from the last final judgment, which was appealable, the appellants having expressly stated otherwise in the record and in open court; nor does the power of the court, by way of granting leave to amend, extend sufficiently to be available here. *Williams*v. *Braun,*65 Ohio App., *253451, 30 N. E. (2d), 363; *Mahaffey*v. *Stine,*28 Ohio Law Abs., 361; *Cultice*v. *DeMaro Realty Co.,*29 Ohio Law Abs., 566. See, also, *Malone*v. *Industrial Commission,*66 Ohio App., 505, 36 N. E. (2d), 52.

In view of the above holding, the court will not discuss other questions raised except to say that having-reserved its ruling on the motion and examined the cause on its merits the court feels the judgment of the court below would in any event have to be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed. ■

*Appeal dismissed.*

Ross, P. J., and Matthews, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                        ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED (SERVICER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

         The  undersigned,  a duly authorized  representative  of St.George Bank
Limited,  as  Servicer  ("St.George  Bank" or the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the
agreement  between  Perpetual  Trustees  Consolidated  Limited,  St.George  Bank
Limited  and  Crusade  Management  Limited,  dated as of  March  25,  2003  (the
"Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

                  1.       Capitalized  terms  used  but  not  defined  in  this
                           Officer's  Certificate have their respective meanings
                           set  forth  in  the  Agreement,  unless  the  context
                           requires otherwise or unless otherwise defined in the
                           Officer's Certificate.

                  2.       As of the date hereof, St.George Bank is the Servicer
                           of Crusade Global Trust No. 1 of 1999.

                  3.       This Officer's  Certificate is delivered  pursuant to
                           the Agreement.

                  4.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
                           year ended  September 30, 2003 and of its performance
                           under the pooling and servicing  agreement or similar
                           agreements was made under my supervision.

                  5.       Based on such review,  to my knowledge,  the Servicer
                           has fulfilled its  obligations  under the pooling and
                           servicing agreement or similar agreements relating to
                           the Trust  (including  the  Master  Trust  Deed dated
                           March 14,  1998,  The  Crusade  Euro Trust  Servicing
                           Agreement dated March 19, 1998 and the  Supplementary
                           Terms Notice  dated  September  22, 1999)  throughout
                           such  calendar  year  and,  except  as set  forth  in
                           paragraph 6 below.

                  6.       The following is a description  of any  exceptions to
                           paragraph 5 above:- No significant  deficiencies were
                           detected.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of the
     Servicer,  has duly executed this  Officer's  Certificate  this 24th day of
     March 2004.


                                               ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED
                                               as Servicer


                                                     /S/  G.M. BARTLETT
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Name:   G.M. Bartlett
                                                     Title:  Group Executive
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, David M. Riddiford, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Action Performance Companies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrantsinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ David M. Riddiford     David M. Riddiford  Chief Financial Officer  August 9, 2005
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1667

To exempt small trailer manufacturers from enhanced early warning reporting 

requirements under the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2003

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. NICKLES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To exempt small trailer manufacturers from enhanced early 

warning reporting requirements under the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WEIGHT EXEMPTION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF 

4 TRAILER MANUFACTURERS. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur6 poses of the early warning reporting requirements under 

7 section 30166(m) of title 49, United States Code, manu8 facturers of trailers with a gross vehicle weight rating of 
2

•S 1667 IS 

1 26,000 pounds or less shall not, with respect to such trail2 ers, be subject to the additional reporting requirements 

3 under section 579.24 of title 49, Code of Federal Regula4 tions, that are applicable to manufacturers that produce, 

5 import, offer for sale, or sell 500 or more vehicles during 

6 the calendar year of a reporting period or during each of 

7 the prior two calendar years.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQUIMED, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,466
<PP&E>                                          23,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,406
<BONDS>                                         18,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,714
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,756)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,646
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,833
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (372)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89
        

</TABLE>
APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATORS
                               OF
                        ABI CAPITAL TRUST


     The undersigned hereby agrees to serve as an Administrator
of ABI Capital Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, under the
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated July 7, 1998 (the
"Trust Agreement"), by and among the American Bancshares, Inc., a
Florida corporation, as Depositor, Bankers Trust Company, a New
York banking corporation, as Property Trustee, and Bankers Trust
(Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, as Delaware Trustee,
until the earlier of my death, resignation, or removal, effective
as of, and conditioned upon, the closing of the merger of
American Bancshares, Inc. with and into Gold Banc Acquisition
Corporation XI, Inc., a Kansas corporation ("Acquisition
Subsidiary"), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, dated as of September 6, 1999, as amended January
24, 2000, by and among American Bancshares, Inc., Acquisition
Subsidiary, and Gold Banc Corporation, Inc., a Kansas corporation
and parent corporation of Acquisition Subsidiary.

     All Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the
Trust Agreement.



     Dated March 20, 2000.



                              /s/ Keith E. Bouchey
                              Keith E. Bouchey
<PAGE>
AGENDA

 

 NASA Advisory Council Ad Hoc Task Force on

 Science, Technology, Engineering

 and Mathematics (STEM) Education

AGENDA

March 20, 2018

12:00 noon – 3:30 pm

NASA Headquarters/Virtual Meeting

Webex and Call In Information Below

12:00 Introduction to Meeting B. Girten

12:05 Opening Remarks by Chair A. Kennedy

12:15 Evaluation and Performance R. LaSalvia

12:35 Office of Education Update M. Kincaid/K.Brown

 Education Business Service Assessment

 New NASA Strategic Plan 2018 & Transition

 Update on STEM Education Advisory Panel

1:00 Discuss Findings and Recommendations Members

2:00 Break All

2:15 Finalize Findings and Recommendations Members

3:30 Adjourn Meeting B. Girten

844–467–6272 or toll access number 720–259–6462, and then the participant passcode: 329152 followed by the # sign. 

WebEx the link is https://nasa.webex.com/, the meeting number is 997 409 583 and the password is Education2018$
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,224,164
<SECURITIES>                                 1,801,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,692,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,954,080
<PP&E>                                      10,963,054
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,580,497)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,001,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,699,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,116
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,600,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,001,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,311,257
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,065,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,844,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,844,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,844,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Barbara J. deWEEVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-1445.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 1980.

Decided' March 28, 1980.

Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Victor R. Ortega, U. S. Atty., Albuquerque, N. M., Robert E. Kopp and Freddi Lipstein, Civ. Div., Dept, of *686Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.

Chris Lucero, Jr., Albuquerque, N. M., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BARRETT, DOYLE and McKAY, Circuit Judges.

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly awarded interest against the United States on a backpay award based on the 1972 Amendments to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which brought federal employees within the coverage of Title VII.

It is settled that interest may be assessed against the federal government only pursuant to express statutory or contractual authorization. *United States v. Alcea Band of Tiilamooks,*341 U.S. 48, 49, 71 S.Ct. 552, 552, 95 L.Ed. 738 (1951); *United States v. Goltra,*312 U.S. 203, 207, 61 S.Ct. 487, 490, 85 L.Ed. 776 (1941); *Smyth*v. *United States,*302 U.S. 329, 353, 58 S.Ct. 248, 252, 82 L.Ed. 294 (1937). The denial of interest absent express authority is based on sovereign immunity. We agree with the First and Third Circuits that Title VII as amended to include federal employees does not provide the necessary express statutory authorization for the award granted by the trial court. *Fischer v. Adams,*572 F.2d 406, 411 (1st Cir. 1978); *Richerson*v. *Jones,*551 F.2d 918, 925 (3rd Cir. 1977).

The judgment of the district court is reversed with directions to dismiss the petition for interest on the backpay award.