alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.1



AMENDMENT NUMBER SIX  
TO THE  
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY  
PENSION RESTORATION PLAN  
FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES
(as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2009)


WHEREAS, effective as of January 1, 2009, the International Paper Company Pension  
Restoration Plan for Salaried Employees (the "Plan") was amended and restated in its  
entirety;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Plan the Company reserves the right to amend, modify, or terminate the Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, the undersigned is the "Plan Administrator" of the Plan within the meaning of Section 5.01 of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, on July 11, 2016, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors delegated its authority to review and approve non-substantive changes to the nonqualified plans of the Company to the administrator for each of such plans;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of January 1, 2020, with application to any Eligible Participant who dies while he or she is actively employed on or after such date, as follows:


1. Article IV of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 4.08:
4.08 Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for an Unmarried Participant. In the event an Eligible Participant dies while actively employed before his Designated Retirement Date and is not married on the date of his death, a death benefit in the form of a lump sum payment shall be paid to his beneficiary named or otherwise determined under the Pension Plan. The amount of such death benefit shall be based on the Eligible Participant's benefit amount determined under Section 3.01, and calculated on the basis of the provisions described under Section 9.05 of the Retirement Plan of International Paper Company as amended. Such death benefit shall be paid as soon as administratively possible after the Plan Administrator receives notification of the death of the Eligible Participant.
1






EXHIBIT 10.1



2. In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is executed this 29th day of January,
2020.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
By:     /s/ Mark M. Azzarello        
                        
Name:  Mark M. Azzarello
Title:    Vice President, Global Compensation and Benefits and Plan Administrator of the International Paper Company Pension Restoration Plan For Salaried Employees
2
|  |
|--|
|  | **Documents**
 Invitation to Apply as Research-Astronaut-Candidate (PDF         - 323K)      

Sample Questions from Project Mercury Tests (PDF         - 194K)      

Press Conference of Mercury Astronaut Team (PDF         - 1.2MB) Click here       for interactive press conference and original video footage.      

Project Mercury: A Description of the Astronaut’s Task (PDF         - 1.3MB)      

Pressure Suits for Project Mercury Astronauts News Release (PDF         - 387K)      

  |

###   

###
# Sitemap

## May 26, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 05
- May 26, 2009

            - Coming Home
            - A Triumphant Return
#### Mizell *v.*Mercer.

Opinion delivered July 7, 1924.

1. Landlord and tenant — abandonment of lease. — A lessee may abandon his lease either by words or by equivalent acts.

2. Landlord and tenant — failure to plant crop. — Failure of a tenant to plant a crop out of which he agreed to pay rent would . amount to a repudiation of the lease, and a holding thereafter by the lessee would be unlawful.

Appeal from White Circuit Court; *E. D. Robertson,*Judge;

reversed.

*J. N. Rachels,*for appellant.

The court erred in instructing the jury to find a verdict in favor of the defendant.

The failure of Mercer to sow oats and plant strawberries set ¡at naught his right to remain in possession of the leased premises. 57 Ark. 301; 97 Ark. 541; 150 Ark. 371.

Humphreys, J.

This is a suit by appellant, lessor, to oust appellee, lessee, from the possession of the north half of the southwest quarter, section 30, township 6 north, range 7 west, in White County, on account of an alleged abandonment of the rental contract for same.

*225Appellee filed an answer denying that he had abandoned the rental contract.

The canse proceeded to a hearing, and, at the conclusion of appellant’s testimony, on motion-of appellee the court directed the jury to return a verdict for him, over the appellant’s objection and'exception, from which is this appeal.

It appears from the testimony that A. B. Hanley owned the land, and contracted to sell same to appellant some time in December, 1921, subject to a rental contract he had theretofore made with appellee for the year 1922. Hanley conveyed the land to appellant on January 30,1922. In October or November, 1921, he had leased it to appellee for a share of the crops, with the understanding that appellee would set out fifteen acres to strawberries in February or March, 1922, plant five bushels of oats, and plant the rest of the land in corn and peas. Appellee did not move upon the land himself, but placed a tenant thereon. According to the. testimony introduced by appellant, appellee failed to plant out the berries or to plant any crop on the land during planting season. The witnesses testified that neither appellee nor his tenant had plowed a furrow at the time this suit was instituted in April, 1922. This indicated that appellee had abandoned the rental contract, in which event he subjected himself to eviction. The lessee may abandon a contract creating a tenancy, either in words or by equivalent acts. A failure to pitch a crop out of which rent is agreed to be paid in kind would amount to a repudiation of the rental contract or lease, and a holding thereafter by the lessee would be unlawful. *Buckner*v. *Warren,*41 Ark. 532; *Lindsey*v. *Bloodworth,*97 Ark. 541; *Leehy*v. *Fullerton,*150 Ark. 371.

On account of the error indicated the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
# Ocular Health (OH) Fundoscope Exam

Astronaut Karen Nyberg and Astronaut Chris Cassidy (partially visible), both Expedition 37 flight engineers, perform an Ocular Health (OH) Fundoscope Exam in the Destiny laboratory of the International Space Station

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-iss036e006524/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 5, 2013ProducerJSCImage CreditKaren NybergSize1920x1277pxPIA Numberiss036e006524The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Sitemap

## September 18, 2003

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2003
- 09
- September 18, 2003

            - F/A-18 #845 Undergoes Flight Test Envelope Expansion for AAR
            - Two F/A-18s Line up for Autonomous Aerial Refueling (AAR)
            - 847 Used as Tanker for Autonomous Aerial Refueling (AAR)
            - F/A-18s 847 and 845 Participate in AAR Flight
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Thomas Hodgson, the Chief Executive Officer of Magna Entertainment Corp. ("MEC"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the "Report") of MEC for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEC.

| | /s/W. THOMAS HODGSONW. Thomas Hodgson, Chief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

Date: March 16, 2006

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Magna Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Magna Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50275 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JE KEOPOLOUS NEAL Defendant-Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-185

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Je Keopolous Neal has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Neal has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 06-50275

2 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my
knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 5, 2008



/s/ James C. FloresJames C. FloresChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.4**

PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY 

SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

SALARY INCREASES 

Effective March 1, 2006 

Effective March 1, 2006, the base salaries of each of the named executive officers of Plains Exploration & Production Company was increased as follows: James C.Flores, to $800,000; Thomas M. Gladney and John F. Wombwell, to $500,000. Each executive’s target bonus is equal to his base salary. 

Information related to theother elements of total compensation for these executive officers was previously disclosed in Plains Exploration & Production Company’s 2006 Proxy Statement filed March 20, 2006.
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the quarterended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report’), I, William P. McComas, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: November 11, 2003 | By:                                           | /s/ William P. McComas | . |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|---|--------|
|                     | William P.  McComas                                |
|                     | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the quarterended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) I, Michael P. Shaunnessy, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: November 11, 2003 | By:                                              | /s/ Michael P. Shaunnessy | . |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---|--------|
|                     | Michael P.  Shaunnessy                                |
|                     | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Document

Exhibit 10.55

Form of Named Executive Officer Temporary Salary Reduction Letter


May 6, 2020


[NAME]
[TITLE]
Laureate Education, Inc.
650 S. Exeter Street
Baltimore, MD  21202




Dear [NAME]:
This letter agreement documents the mutual agreement between you and Laureate Education, Inc. (the “Company”) regarding your voluntary salary reduction.  Effective as of May 16, 2020, your annual salary rate will be reduced from $[•]∙(your “Current Salary”) to $[•] (your “Temporary Reduction in Salary”); provided, however, that your Current Salary would be used, if applicable, for the purposes of (1) calculating any severance payable under the terms of the Laureate Education, Inc. Severance Policy for Executives (the “Severance Policy”), as amended by that certain retention letter agreement dated [•] (the “Retention Letter”) and (2)  calculating your award under the Company’s 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, if any (for the avoidance of doubt, this means that your annual incentive target and maximum bonuses will continue to be understood to refer to those respective specified percentages of your Current Salary).  Your annual salary rate will automatically revert to your Current Salary on August 14, 2020, without the need for you or the Company to take any further action to reflect this change.
Further, if an agreement should be executed by the Company in connection with a transaction, or a series of transactions, the consummation of which would result in a Change in Control (as defined in the Severance Policy), your annual salary rate will immediately and automatically revert to your Current Salary.
You further agree that the Temporary Reduction in Salary described herein will not constitute [Retention Bonus Good Reason or] Modified Good Reason (as defined in the Retention Letter).
Finally, for the avoidance of doubt, the Temporary Reduction in Salary (1) will not modify other rights under any agreements that are determined by reference to your annual salary rate; such provisions will continue to be applied based on the annual salary rate in effect prior to the waiver, and (2) is not intended to reduce any employee benefit provided to you that is determined by reference to your annual salary rate, except as may be required by law.
As confirmation of acceptance of your Temporary Reduction in Salary and other conditions in this letter agreement, please sign this letter agreement in the space provided below and return an executed copy to me. 




Sincerely,
Laureate Education, Inc. 




By:       
Name: 
Title:   
              













Exhibit 10.55

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:






Signature:         
                 [NAME]




Date:  May 6, 2020
# Aeronautics Educator Guide

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators

## Grade Levels

Grades K-4

## Subject

History, Physical Science, Flight, Flight and Aeronautics

## Type

Educator Guides, Lesson Plans / Activities

The activities in this guide help students learn the basic principles of flight. The guide is divided into three chapters:
              - Air.
              - Flight.
              - We Can Fly, You and I.

The end of each chapter has a list of simple interdisciplinary activities for all elementary subjects.Aeronautics Educator Guide**** [3MB PDF file]

**Lessons/Activities:**Air EnginesDunked NapkinPaper Bag MaskWind in Your SocksAir: Interdisciplinary Learning ActivitiesBag BalloonsSled KiteRight FlightDelta Wing GliderRotor MotorFlight: Interdisciplinary Learning ActivitiesMaking Time FlyWhere is North? The Compass Can Tell UsLet’s Build a Table Top AirportPlan to Fly ThereWe Can Fly, You and I: Interdisciplinary Learning Activities
#### Thurman *v.*Hammond.

*Friday, January*18, 1839.

If, in a suit commenced before a justice of the peace, the matter in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, be less than 20 dollars, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction.

ERROR to the *Spencer*Circuit Court.

*J. A. Brackenridge,*for the plaintiff.

*S. C.*Stevens, for the defendant.

Blackford, J.

Action on contract against *Thurman,*commenced before a justice of the peace. Demand 3 dollars and 87 cents. No claim on the part of the defendant. Verdict and judgment in the justice’s Court for the plaintiff for 3 dollars and 87 cents. Defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. Verdict and judgment in the Circuit Court for the plaintiff for 4 dollars and 54 cents. The costs are certified at 58 dollars and 76 cents. The defendant below is the plaintiff in error. A supersedeas was granted at the last term.

The matter in controversy in this cause, *exclusive of interest and costs,*is under 20 dollars. That being the case, this Court has no jurisdiction. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 202.

*Per Curiam.*

The cause is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
# Breaking Boundaries in New Engine Designs

In an effort to improve fuel efficiency, NASA and the aircraft industry are rethinking aircraft design. Inside the 8’ x 6’ wind tunnel at NASA Glenn, engineers recently tested a fan and inlet design, commonly called a propulsor, which could use four to eight percent less fuel than today’s advanced aircraft.The new propulsor is designed to be embedded in the aircraft’s body, where it would ingest the slower flowing air that normally develops along an aircraft’s surface, called boundary layer, and use it to help propel the aircraft.The tests showed that the new fan and inlet design could withstand the turbulent boundary layer airflow and increase efficiency. Results of the tests can be applied to cutting-edge aircraft designs that NASA and its partners are pursuing.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/breaking-boundaries-new-engine-designs/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Advanced Air Transport Technology
- Advanced Air Vehicles Program
- Aeronautics
- Green Aviation Tech
Image CreditNASA / Rami Daud (Alcyon Technical Services)Size1041x695pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Lillian Gipson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Sitemap

## September 15, 2006

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2006
- 09
- September 15, 2006

            - Cassini Significant Events  09/07/06 – 09/13/06
#### Jeffrey Scott CLEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael D. MURPHY, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, and David M. Hinds, PA; Jamie Reid; Paula Smith, Defendants.

No. 03-6913.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.

Decided Sept. 10, 2003.

Jeffrey Scott Clegg, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Billings Crawford, Crawford Law Office, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Scott Clegg appeals the district court’s order setting aside a default judgment against one of the named defendants and denying Clegg’s discovery motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Clegg seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Clegg’s “motion for clarification” and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*