alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

LIMITED WAIVER OF BASE SALARY AGREEMENT
This Limited Waiver of Base Salary Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of this 25th day of March 2020 by and between Liquidity Services, Inc. (the “Corporation”), and the undersigned executive officer of the Corporation (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Corporation is taking numerous proactive steps to mitigate the negative financial and operational impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic;
WHEREAS, these business contingency plans include, among other steps, implementing remote and virtual work plans, cancelling non-essential travel and spending, reducing the pay of employees, shortening work weeks, and furloughs; 
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive and the Corporation have entered into an Executive Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive has voluntarily agreed to allow the Corporation to reduce his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the period of time from April 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 (the “Covered Period”).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the Executive agree to the following:
1.  Term. This Agreement shall be in force and effective throughout the Covered Period.
2.  Reduced Base Salary During the Covered Period. The Executive hereby voluntarily agrees to the Corporation reducing his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the Covered Period.  Such a reduction shall not be deemed a breach of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement.  Executive and the Corporation further agree that the foregoing does not lower base salary for any other purpose under Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation, including, without limitation, the calculation of any severance payment in the event of a termination.
3.  Miscellaneous. To the extent not subject to federal law, this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and each of their respective affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns. This Agreement is not intended to amend or otherwise change or modify the terms of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation except as expressly set forth herein.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and the Executive have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.








																					
							
	EXECUTIVE				LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.		
							
	/s/Jorge A. Celaya
						
	

Name: Jorge A. Celaya__________________
				By:		/s/ William P. Angrick, III

				



		 William P. Angrick, III
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
StHealth Capital Investment Corp. 10-K

 

**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification of Principal FinancialOfficer **

**Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350** 

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**  

 

Pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of StHealth Capital Investment Corp. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2019 of the Company (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

** **
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1746 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 328
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1746

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2003

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

                            October 27, 2003

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIAN C. HICKEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Brian C. 
Hickey Post Office Building.

                                                       Calendar No. 328

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1746

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 27, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41723 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ALEJANDRO LICEA

- CERDA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 747

- 1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Licea

Cerda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Licea

- Cerda h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 12, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41723 Document: 00514069793 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2017No. 15

- 41723

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41723 Document: 00514069793 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2017
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-08-094-CV

 

MARIA LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS NEXT FRIEND APPELLANTS

OF RODOLFO PEREZ, A MINOR, AND AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF RODOLFO PEREZ, DECEASED, 

SALETA PEREZ, AND GUILLERMO PEREZ

V.

NICK YBARRA D/B/A N&S ACOUSTICS, APPELLEES

GRUPO ZOCALO MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

BOXER PROPERTY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 

A/K/A BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 

TOWN CENTER MALL, L.P., GRUPO ZOCALO, L.P., 

TOWN CENTER PROPERTY, L.L.C., AND 

LGP PROPERTY, L.L.C.

----------

FROM THE 342 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY nd

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

On May 5, 2008, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellants, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record

and provided this court with proof of payment. 

Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for

want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM 

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

 

DELIVERED: June 12, 2008
#### DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., Appellees, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Appellees, Central Arizona Water Conservation District, et al., Appellants.

Nos. 00-5377, 00-5378, 00-5390, 00-5397, 00-5399.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Eric Robert Glitzenstein, Katherine Anne Meyer, Meyer & Glitzenstein, William John Snape, III, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Carlisle Shilton, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Virginia Swisshelm Abrecht, Robert L. Gulley, Andrew Jacob Turner, Douglas Scott Burdin, Hunton & Williams, William P. Horn, Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot, Washington, DC, John B. Weldon, Jr., Salmon, Lewis & Weldon, Phoenix, AZ, Richard M. Frank, Sacramento, CA, Peter Emmerich von Haam, Los Angeles, CA, Mary Elizabeth Hackenbracht, Oakland, CA for Movant Intervenor-Appellant.

Edward Joseph McGrath, Kellie A. Donnelly, Sullivan & Worcester, Washington, DC, Lisa Michelle McKnight, Salmon, Lewis & Weldon, Gregg A. Houtz, William Patrick Schiffer, Phoenix, AZ, James H. Davenport, Las Vegas, NV, for Movant Intervenor-Appellee.

Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the district court’s order entered March 31, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment; the district court’s order entered June 4, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration; and the expiration of the time for filing a notice of appeal on August 4, 2003, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), without any such notice being filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that this appeal from the order of the district court denying appel*64lants leave to intervene as of right be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
|Exhibit 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
|   



|Registrant.
|-----------



|/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Ken F. Parsons, Sr.Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(principal executive officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Sandra L. SagerSandra L. Sager, CPAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|November 19, 2008
|-----------------



---
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 11, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

KAISER-FRANCIS OIL COMPANY,

a Delaware corporation, 

 Petitioner,

v.

JC HILL; ALICE HILL, individually

and on behalf of others similarly

situated, 

 Respondents.

 

No. 10-701

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00007-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER

Before TACHA, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on a Petition for Permission to Appeal, filed

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (f) by petitioner Kaiser-Francis Oil Company. 

Petitioner seeks permission to appeal from the district court’s order of June

9, 2010 (as amended by the order issued on August 5, 2010), granting class

certification. Respondents have filed an answer in opposition to the petition. 

Upon consideration of the petition, the answer, and the file as a whole, the

petition for permission to appeal is denied. See Vallario v. Vandehey, 554 F. 3d 

Appellate Case: 10-701 Document: 01018475110 Date Filed: 08/11/2010 Page: 1 
2

1259 (10th Cir. 2009). Petitioner’s request for oral argument is also denied. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court

by:

Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-701 Document: 01018475110 Date Filed: 08/11/2010 Page: 2
- Home
- NASA Stennis Media Resources
- NASA Stennis Image Articles

- Stennis Home
- About Stennis
- Mission
- STEM Engagement
- Media Resources
- Visit Stennis

NASA Lawyer Contributes to the Commercialization of Space
Cassi Meyer, a NASA lawyer, can certainly testify that the nontraditional path taken from law school to NASA has landed…

How NASA Continues Inspiring Engineer’s Future
Work at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, takes one site engineer back to a childhood memory,…

NASA Employee Grateful for Opportunities at NASA Stennis
Cherie Beech knows full well the opportunity that working at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, affords.…

NASA Conducts Full-Duration Artemis Moon Rocket Engine Test
NASA continued a key RS-25 engine test series for future Artemis flights of the agency’s powerful SLS (Space Launch System)…

NASA Continues Artemis Moon Rocket Engine Test Series
NASA conducted a full-duration RS-25 engine hot fire March 6, continuing a final round of certification testing for production of…

Artemis Generation Students Inspired During NASA STEM Event
By Bo Black at NASA’s Stennis Space Center, with assistance from students at Pascagoula (Mississippi) High School, Hancock County (Mississippi)…

NASA Leaders Participate in Annual Stennis Day at the Capitol
Leaders from NASA’s Stennis Space Center and NASA Shared Services Center visit Jackson, Mississippi, in late February to share site…

NASA Stennis Software Assurance Expert Enjoys the Challenge Her Work Provides
Rae Anderson never set out to have a career with NASA, but the pursuit of opportunities around her interest in…

First Hot Fire Test of the Year for Artemis
Clouds of white vapor pile up at NASA’s Stennis Space Center in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, during a full-duration, 500-second…

NASA Employee Supports Mission While Inspiring Artemis Generation
NASA inspires as it explores secrets of the universe for the benefit of all – just ask Tony Goretski, the…

Team Mindset Fuels NASA Stennis Test Operations Leader
One thing has remained constant throughout Maury Vander’s career with NASA – the satisfaction of being part of a team…

NASA’s Stennis Space Center Hosts Take Our Children to Work Day
The Artemis Generation came out in full force at NASA’s Stennis Space Center as children of Stennis employees had the…

NASA Enters Stretch in Critical Moon Rocket Engine Test Series
NASA entered the stretch run of a key RS-25 certification engine test series with a successful hot fire June 1,…

NASA Continues Key Test Series with Moon Rocket Engine Hot Fire
NASA completed a full duration hot fire of the RS-25 certification engine May 23, continuing a critical test series to…

NASA, Stennis Leaders Deliver Updates at Annual Director’s Community Briefing
The 11th annual NASA Stennis Space Center Director’s Community Briefing took place March 23 at the Brownstone Center on the…

## Discover More Topics From NASA Stennis

Stennis News

NASA Stennis Fact Sheets

Visit NASA Stennis

Multi-User Test Complex
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                           |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    STEPHEN A. THORINGTONStephen A. Thorington Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Tuesday 31st 

 December, 1996. 

Kimberly O. Janis 

 and Thomas Janis, 

 Appellants, 

 against Record No. 0271-95-2 

 Circuit Court Nos. F94-77 and F94-78 

Commonwealth of Virginia, 

 Appellee. 

Upon a Rehearing En Banc 

 Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, 

 Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton 

 Charles R. Watson for appellants. 

 Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney 

General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellee. 

 In Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 646, 650-51, 472 

S.E.2d 649, 651 (1996), a majority of a panel of the Court reversed 

and remanded the convictions of Kimberly O. Janis and Thomas Janis. A 

dissenting opinion was filed in the panel decision. The 

Commonwealth's petition for rehearing en banc was granted and heard on 

November 26, 1996. For the reasons stated in the panel's majority 

opinion, the convictions are reversed, the matters are remanded to the 

Circuit Court of Dinwiddie County and, accordingly, the stay of this 

Court's July 9, 1996 mandate is lifted. 

Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Coleman and Fitzpatrick 

would affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in 

the dissenting opinion of the original panel decision. 
 -2- 

This order shall be published and certified to the trial 

court. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk 

 By: 

 Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001093371
<NAME>                                         Digi Link Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         15,867
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,924
<PP&E>                                         106,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          658,894
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,197
<OTHER-SE>                                     (434,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,161
<SALES>                                        46,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,140
<CGS>                                          32,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               283,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (289,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (289,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (289,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)




</TABLE>