Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 67095 

CBP Form 3124, ‘‘Application for 

Customs Broker License’’ 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

300. 

Total Number of Estimated Annual 

Responses: 300. 

Estimated time per Response: 1 hour. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 500. 

Triennial Report (19 CFR 111.30) 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

3,833. 

Total Number of Estimated Annual 

Responses: 3,833. 

Estimated time per Response: .5 

hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 1,917. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to the 

Public: $383,300. 

National Broker Permit Application (19 

CFR 111.19) 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

500. 

Total Number of Estimated Annual 

Responses: 500. 

Estimated time per Response: 1 hour. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 500. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to the 

Public: $112,500. 

Dated: October 26, 2010. 

Tracey Denning, 

Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27489 Filed 10–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R6–R–2010–N215; 60138–1261– 

6CCP–S3] 

Charles M. Russell National Wildlife 

Refuge and UL Bend National Wildlife 

Refuge, Montana 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior (DOI). 

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, are extending the 

comment period for the availability of a 

draft comprehensive conservation plan 

(CCP) and environmental impact 

statement (EIS) for Charles M. Russell 

and UL Bend National Wildlife Refuges 

(NWRs, Refuges) in Montana for public 

review and comment. We extend the 

comment period for an additional 24 

days. 

DATES: We must receive any written 

comments on the CCP and EIS by 

December 10, 2010, at 5 p.m. Mountain 

Time. 

ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the 

CCP and EIS can be sent by U.S. Mail, 

facsimile, or e-mail to Laurie Shannon, 

Planning Team Leader, Fish and 

Wildlife Service, Region 6, P.O. Box 

25486, Denver, CO 80225–0486; or 

facsimile (303) 236–4317; or e-mail 

cmrplanning@fws.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurie Shannon, 303–236–4317, or Bill 

Berg, 406–538–8706. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are 

extending the comment period for 

review of the draft CCP and EIS for 

Charles M. Russell NWR and UL Bend 

NWR. On September 7, 2010, we 

opened a 60-day public comment period 

via a Federal Register notice (75 FR 

54381). We now extend the comment 

period for an additional 24 days. The 

comment period will now officially 

close on December 10, 2010, at 5 p.m. 

Mountain Time. 

Background 

For background information, see our 

September 7, 2010, notice (75 FR 

54381). 

Document Availability 

Copies of the draft CCP and EIS are 

available on the Mountain-Prairie 

Region Web site at http://www.fws.gov/ 

mountain-prairie/; or the project Web 

site at http://www.fws.gov/cmr/ 

planning. 

Individuals wishing copies of the 

draft CCP and EIS should contact the 

Service by telephone (see FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT) or by letter (see 

ADDRESSES). 

Additionally, hardcopies of the draft 

CCP and EIS are available for viewing, 

or for partial or complete duplication, at 

the following locations: 

Library Address Phone number 

Garfield County .......................................................................... 228 E. Main, Jordan, MT 59337 .............................................. (406) 557–2297 

Glasgow ..................................................................................... 408 3rd Avenue, Glasgow, MT 59230 ..................................... (406) 228–2731 

Great Falls ................................................................................. 301 2nd Avenue, Great Falls, MT 59401 ................................ (406) 453–0349 

Lewistown .................................................................................. 701 W. Main, Lewistown, MT 59457 ....................................... (406) 538–5212 

McCone County ......................................................................... 1101 C Avenue, Circle, MT 59215 .......................................... (406) 485–2350 

Petroleum County ...................................................................... 205 S. Broadway, Winnett, MT 59087 ..................................... (406) 429–2451 

Phillips County ........................................................................... 10 S. 4th Street E., Malta, MT 59538 ...................................... (406) 542–2407 

Montana State University—Billings ........................................... 1500 University Drive, Billings, MT 59101 ............................... (406) 657–2011 

Montana State University—Bozeman ........................................ Roland R. Renne Library, Centennial Mall, Bozeman, MT 

59717.

(406) 994–3171 

Montana State University—Havre ............................................. Northern Vande Bogart Library, Cowan Drive, Havre, MT 

59501.

(406) 265–3706 

University of Montana ................................................................ Mansfield Library, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812 ..... (406) 243–6860 

Colorado State University .......................................................... Morgan Library, 501 University Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 

80523.

(970) 491–1841 

Dated: October 21, 2010. 

Hugh Morrison, 

Acting Regional Director, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27352 Filed 10–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

Rate Adjustments for Indian Irrigation 

Projects 

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rate 

adjustments. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs 

(BIA) owns or has an interest in 

irrigation projects located on or 

associated with various Indian 

reservations throughout the United 

States. We are required to establish 

irrigation assessment rates to recover the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

67096 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 

costs to administer, operate, maintain, 

and rehabilitate these projects. We 

request your comments on the proposed 

rate adjustments. 

DATES: Interested parties may submit 

comments on the proposed rate 

adjustments on or before January 3, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: All comments on the 

proposed rate adjustments must be in 

writing and addressed to: John Anevski, 

Chief, Division of Irrigation, Power and 

Safety of Dams, Office of Trust Services, 

Mail Stop 4655–MIB, 1849 C Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 

(202) 208–5480. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

details about a particular irrigation 

project, please use the tables in 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section to 

contact the regional or local office 

where the project is located. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The first 

table in this notice provides contact 

information for individuals who can 

give further information about the 

irrigation projects covered by this 

notice. The second table provides the 

current 2010 irrigation assessment rates, 

the proposed rates for the 2011 

irrigation season, and proposed rates for 

subsequent years where these are 

available. 

What is the meaning of the key terms 

used in this notice? 

In this notice: 

Administrative costs means all costs 

we incur to administer our irrigation 

projects at the local project level and is 

a cost factor included in calculating 

your operation and maintenance 

assessment. Costs incurred at the local 

project level do not normally include 

Agency, Region, or Central Office costs 

unless we state otherwise in writing. 

Assessable acre means lands 

designated by us to be served by one of 

our irrigation projects, for which we 

collect assessments in order to recover 

costs for the provision of irrigation 

service. (See total assessable acres.) 

BIA means the Bureau of Indian 

Affairs. 

Bill means our statement to you of the 

assessment charges and/or fees you owe 

the United States for administration, 

operation, maintenance, and/or 

rehabilitation. The date we mail or 

hand-deliver your bill will be stated on 

it. 

Costs means the costs we incur for 

administration, operation, maintenance, 

and rehabilitation to provide direct 

support or benefit to an irrigation 

facility. (See administrative costs, 

operation costs, maintenance costs, and 

rehabilitation costs.) 

Customer means any person or entity 

to which we provide irrigation service. 

Due date is the date on which your 

bill is due and payable. This date will 

be stated on your bill. 

I, me, my, you and your means all 

persons or entities that are affected by 

this notice. 

Irrigation project means a facility or 

portion thereof for the delivery, 

diversion, and storage of irrigation water 

that we own or have an interest in, 

including all appurtenant works. The 

term ‘‘irrigation project’’ is used 

interchangeably with irrigation facility, 

irrigation system, and irrigation area. 

Irrigation service means the full range 

of services we provide customers of our 

irrigation projects. This includes our 

activities to administer, operate, 

maintain, and rehabilitate our projects 

in order to deliver water. 

Maintenance costs means costs we 

incur to maintain and repair our 

irrigation projects and associated 

equipment and is a cost factor included 

in calculating your operation and 

maintenance assessment. 

Operation and maintenance (O&M) 

assessment means the periodic charge 

you must pay us to reimburse costs of 

administering, operating, maintaining, 

and rehabilitating irrigation projects 

consistent with this notice and our 

supporting policies, manuals, and 

handbooks. 

Operation or operating costs means 

costs we incur to operate our irrigation 

projects and equipment and is a cost 

factor included in calculating your O&M 

assessment. 

Past due bill means a bill that has not 

been paid by the close of business on 

the 30th day after the due date as stated 

on the bill. 

Rehabilitation costs means costs we 

incur to restore our irrigation projects or 

features to original operating condition 

or to the nearest state which can be 

achieved using current technology and 

is a cost factor included in calculating 

your O&M assessment. 

Responsible party means an 

individual or entity that owns or leases 

land within the assessable acreage of 

one of our irrigation projects and is 

responsible for providing accurate 

information to our billing office and 

paying a bill for an annual irrigation rate 

assessment. 

Total assessable acres means the total 

acres served by one of our irrigation 

projects. 

Water delivery is an activity that is 

part of the irrigation service we provide 

our customers when water is available. 

We, us, and our means the United 

States Government, the Secretary of the 

Interior, the BIA, and all who are 

authorized to represent us in matters 

covered under this notice. 

Does this notice affect me? 

This notice affects you if you own or 

lease land within the assessable acreage 

of one of our irrigation projects or if you 

have a carriage agreement with one of 

our irrigation projects. 

Where can I get information on the 

regulatory and legal citations in this 

notice? 

You can contact the appropriate 

office(s) stated in the tables for the 

irrigation project that serves you, or you 

can use the Internet site for the 

Government Printing Office at http:// 

www.gpo.gov. 

Why are you publishing this notice? 

We are publishing this notice to notify 

you that we propose to adjust our 

irrigation assessment rates. This notice 

is published in accordance with the 

BIA’s regulations governing its 

operation and maintenance of irrigation 

projects, found at 25 CFR part 171. This 

regulation provides for the 

establishment and publication of the 

rates for annual irrigation assessments 

as well as related information about our 

irrigation projects. 

What authorizes you to issue this 

notice? 

Our authority to issue this notice is 

vested in the Secretary of the Interior by 

5 U.S.C. 301 and the Act of August 14, 

1914 (38 Stat. 583; 25 U.S.C. 385). The 

Secretary has in turn delegated this 

authority to the Assistant Secretary— 

Indian Affairs under Part 209, Chapter 

8.1A, of the Department of the Interior’s 

Departmental Manual. 

When will you put the rate adjustments 

into effect? 

We will put the rate adjustments into 

effect for the 2011 irrigation season and 

subsequent years where applicable. 

How do you calculate irrigation rates? 

We calculate annual irrigation 

assessment rates in accordance with 25 

CFR 171.500 by estimating the annual 

costs of operation and maintenance at 

each of our irrigation projects and then 

dividing by the total assessable acres for 

that particular irrigation project. The 

result of this calculation for each project 

is stated in the rate table in this notice. 

What kinds of expenses do you 

consider in determining the estimated 

annual costs of operation and 

maintenance? 

Consistent with 25 CFR 171.500, these 

expenses include the following: 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 67097 

(a) Salary and benefits for the project 

engineer/manager and project 

employees under the project engineer/ 

manager’s management or control; 

(b) Materials and supplies; 

(c) Vehicle and equipment repairs; 

(d) Equipment costs, including lease 

fees; 

(e) Depreciation; 

(f) Acquisition costs; 

(g) Maintenance of a reserve fund 

available for contingencies or 

emergency costs needed for the reliable 

operation of the irrigation facility 

infrastructure; 

(h) Maintenance of a vehicle and 

heavy equipment replacement fund; 

(i) Systematic rehabilitation and 

replacement of project facilities; 

(j) Contingencies for unknown costs 

and omitted budget items; and 

(k) Other expenses we determine 

necessary to properly perform the 

activities and functions characteristic of 

an irrigation project. 

When should I pay my irrigation 

assessment? 

We will mail or hand-deliver your bill 

notifying you of: (a) The amount you 

owe to the United States; and (b) when 

such amount is due. If we mail your bill, 

we will consider it as being delivered no 

later than 5 business days after the day 

we mail it. You should pay your bill by 

the due date stated on the bill. 

What information must I provide for 

billing purposes? 

All responsible parties are required to 

provide the following information to the 

billing office associated with the 

irrigation project where you own or 

lease land within the project’s 

assessable acreage or to the billing office 

associated with the irrigation project 

with which you have a carriage 

agreement: 

(1) The full legal name of the person 

or entity responsible for paying the bill; 

(2) An adequate and correct address 

for mailing or hand delivering our bill; 

and 

(3) The taxpayer identification 

number or social security number of the 

person or entity responsible for paying 

the bill. 

Why are you collecting my taxpayer 

identification number or social security 

number? 

Public Law 104–134, the Debt 

Collection Improvement Act of 1996, 

requires that we collect the taxpayer 

identification number or social security 

number before billing a responsible 

party and as a condition to servicing the 

account. 

What happens if I am a responsible 

party but I fail to furnish the 

information required to the billing 

office responsible for the irrigation 

project within which I own or lease 

assessable land or for which I have a 

carriage agreement? 

If you are late paying your bill 

because of your failure to furnish the 

required information listed above, you 

will be assessed interest and penalties 

as provided below, and your failure to 

provide the required information will 

not provide grounds for you to appeal 

your bill or any penalties assessed. 

What can happen if I do not provide the 

information required for billing 

purposes? 

We can refuse to provide you 

irrigation service. 

If I allow my bill to become past due, 

could this affect my water delivery? 

If we do not receive your payment 

before the close of business on the 30th 

day after the due date stated on your 

bill, we will send you a past due notice. 

This past due notice will have 

additional information concerning your 

rights. We will consider your past due 

notice as delivered no later than 5 

business days after the day we mail it. 

We have the right to refuse water 

delivery to any irrigated land for which 

the bill is past due. We can continue to 

refuse water delivery until you pay your 

bill or make payment arrangements to 

which we agree. We follow the 

procedures provided in 31 CFR 901.2, 

‘‘Demand for Payment,’’ when 

demanding payment of your past due 

bill. 

Are there any additional charges if I am 

late paying my bill? 

Yes. We will assess you interest on 

the amount owed, using the rate of 

interest established annually by the 

Secretary of the United States Treasury 

(Treasury) to calculate what you will be 

assessed (31 CFR 901.9(b)). You will not 

be assessed this charge until your bill is 

past due. However, if you allow your 

bill to become past due, interest will 

accrue from the original due date, not 

the past due date. Also, you will be 

charged an administrative fee of $12.50 

for each time we try to collect your past 

due bill. If your bill becomes more than 

90 days past due, you will be assessed 

a penalty charge of six percent (6%) per 

year, which will accrue from the date 

your bill initially became past due. As 

a Federal agency, we are required to 

charge interest, penalties, and 

administrative costs on debts owed to us 

pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 

901.9, ‘‘Interest, penalties, and 

administrative costs.’’ 

What else will happen to my past due 

bill? 

If you do not pay your bill or make 

payment arrangements to which we 

agree, we are required to send your past 

due bill to the Treasury for further 

action. Under the provisions of 31 CFR 

901.1, ‘‘Aggressive agency collection 

activity,’’ we must send any unpaid 

annual irrigation assessment bill to 

Treasury no later than 180 days after the 

original due date of the bill. 

Who can I contact for further 

information? 

The following tables are the regional 

and project/agency contacts for our 

irrigation facilities. 

Project name Project/agency contacts 

Northwest Region Contacts 

Stanley Speaks, Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Regional Office, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232–4169, 

Telephone: (503) 231–6702 

Fort Hall Irrigation Project ............... Dean Fox, Acting Superintendent, Fort Hall Agency, P.O. Box 220, Fort Hall, ID 83203–0220, Telephone: 

(208) 238–2301. 

Wapato Irrigation Project ................ Edwin Lewis, Acting Project Administrator, Wapato Irrigation Project, P.O. Box 220, Wapato, WA 98951– 

0220, Telephone: (509) 877–3155. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

67098 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 

Project name Project/agency contacts 

Rocky Mountain Region Contacts 

Ed Parisian, Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 316 North 26th Street, Billings, Montana 59101, 

Telephone: (406) 247–7943. 

Blackfeet Irrigation Project .............. Stephen Pollock, Superintendent, Ted Hall, Irrigation Project Manager, Box 880, Browning, MT 59417, 

Telephones: (406) 338–7544, Superintendent, (406) 338–7519, Irrigation Project Manager. 

Crow Irrigation Project .................... Frank Merchant, Acting Superintendent, Vacant, Irrigation Project Manager, P.O. Box 69, Crow Agency, 

MT 59022, Telephones: (406) 638–2672, Superintendent, (406) 638–2863, Irrigation Project Manager. 

Fort Belknap Irrigation Project ........ Cliff Hall, Superintendent, Vacant, Irrigation Project Manager, (Project operations & management contracted Tribes), R.R.1, Box 980, Harlem, MT 59526, Telephones: (406) 353–2901, Superintendent, (406) 

353–2905, Irrigation Project Manager. 

Fort Peck Irrigation Project ............. Florence White Eagle, Superintendent, P.O. Box 637, Poplar, MT 59255, Huber Wright, Acting Irrigation 

Manager, 602 6th Avenue North, Wolf Point, MT 59201, Telephones: (406) 768–5312, Superintendent, 

(406) 653–1752, Irrigation Manager. 

Wind River Irrigation Project ........... Ed Lone Fight, Superintendent, Sheridan Nicholas, Irrigation Project Engineer, P.O. Box 158, Fort 

Washakie, WY 82514, Telephones: (307) 332–7810, Superintendent, (307) 332–2596, Irrigation Project 

Manager. 

Southwest Region Contacts 

William T. Walker, Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Southwest Regional Office, 1001 Indian School Road, Albuquerque, New Mexico 

87104, Telephone: (505) 563–3100. 

Pine River Irrigation Project ............ John Waconda, Superintendent, Vacant, Irrigation Engineer, P.O. Box 315, Ignacio, CO 81137–0315, Telephones: (970) 563–4511, Superintendent, (970) 563–9484, Irrigation Engineer. 

Western Region Contacts 

Rodney McVey, Acting Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Western Regional Office, 2600 N. Central Ave., 4th Floor Mailroom, Phoenix, 

Arizona 85004, Telephone: (602) 379–6600. 

Colorado River Irrigation Project .... Janice Staudte, Superintendent, Ted Henry, Irrigation Project Manager, 12124 1st Avenue, Parker, AZ 

85344, Telephone: (928) 669–7111. 

Duck Valley Irrigation Project ......... Joseph McDade, Superintendent, 1555 Shoshone Circle, Elko, NV 89801, Telephone: (775) 738–0569. 

Fort Yuma Irrigation Project ............ Irene Herder, Superintendent, P.O. Box 11000, Yuma, AZ 85366, Telephone: (928) 782–1202. 

San Carlos Irrigation Project Joint 

Works.

Bryan Bowker, Project Manager, Clarence Begay, Irrigation Manager, P.O. Box 250, Coolidge, AZ 85228, 

Telephone: (520) 723–6215. 

San Carlos Irrigation Project Indian 

Works.

Cecilia Martinez, Superintendent, Joe Revak, Supervisory General Engineer, Pima Agency, Land Operations, P.O. Box 8, Sacaton, AZ 85247, Telephone: (520) 562–3326, Telephone: (520) 562–3372. 

Uintah Irrigation Project .................. Daniel Picard, Superintendent, Dale Thomas, Irrigation Manager, P.O. Box 130, Fort Duchesne, UT 84026, 

Telephone: (435) 722–4300, Telephone: (435) 722–4341. 

Walker River Irrigation Project ........ Athena Brown, Superintendent, 311 E. Washington Street, Carson City, NV 89701, Telephone: (775) 887– 

3500. 

What irrigation assessments or charges 

are proposed for adjustment by this 

notice? 

The rate table below contains the 

current rates for all irrigation projects 

where we recover costs of 

administering, operating, maintaining, 

and rehabilitating them. The table also 

contains the proposed rates for the 2011 

season and subsequent years where 

applicable. An asterisk immediately 

following the name of the project notes 

the irrigation project where rates are 

proposed for adjustment. 

Project name Rate category Final 2010 

rate 

Proposed 

2011 rate 

Fort Hall Irrigation Project * ............................................................................................... Basic-per acre ..................... $40.50 $42.00 

Minimum Charge per tract ... 30.00 31.50 

Fort Hall Irrigation Project—Minor Units * ......................................................................... Basic-per acre ..................... 21.00 22.50 

Minimum Charge per tract ... 30.00 31.50 

Fort Hall Irrigation Project—Michaud * .............................................................................. Basic-per acre ..................... 41.50 43.00 

Pressure per acre ................ 58.00 59.50 

Minimum Charge per tract ... 30.00 31.50 

Wapato Irrigation Project—Toppenish/Simcoe Units * ...................................................... Minimum Charge for per bill 15.00 17.00 

Basic-per acre ..................... 15.00 17.00 

Wapato Irrigation Project—Ahtanum Units * ..................................................................... Minimum Charge per bill ..... 15.00 17.00 

Basic-per acre ..................... 15.00 17.00 

Wapato Irrigation Project—Satus Unit * ............................................................................ Minimum Charge for per bill 58.00 63.00 

‘‘A’’ Basic-per acre ............... 58.00 63.00 

‘‘B’’ Basic-per acre ............... 68.00 70.00 

Wapato Irrigation Project—Additional Works * .................................................................. Minimum Charge per bill ..... 63.00 67.00 

Basic-per acre ..................... 63.00 67.00 

Wapato Irrigation Project—Water Rental * ........................................................................ Minimum Charge ................. 70.00 72.00 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 67099 

Project name Rate category Final 2010 

rate 

Proposed 

2011 rate 

Basic-per acre ..................... 70.00 72.00 

Rocky Mountain Region Rate Table 

Blackfeet Irrigation Project ................................................................................................ Basic-per acre ..................... 19.00 19.00 

Crow Irrigation Project—Willow Creek O&M (includes Agency, Lodge Grass #1, Lodge 

Grass #2, Reno, Upper Little Horn, and Forty Mile Units).

Basic-per acre ..................... 22.80 22.80 

Crow Irrigation Project—All Others (includes Bighorn, Soap Creek, and Pryor Units) .... Basic-per acre ..................... 22.50 22.50 

Crow Irrigation Two Leggins Drainage District ................................................................. Basic-per acre ..................... 2.00 2.00 

Fort Belknap Irrigation Project ........................................................................................... Basic-per acre ..................... 14.75 14.75 

Fort Peck Irrigation Project ................................................................................................ Basic-per acre ..................... 24.70 24.70 

Wind River Irrigation Project ............................................................................................. Basic-per acre ..................... 20.00 20.00 

Wind River Irrigation Project–LeClair District * (see Note #1) .......................................... Basic-per acre ..................... 26.00 21.00 

Wind River Irrigation Project—CrowHeart Unit ................................................................. Basic-per acre ..................... 14.00 14.00 

Wind River Irrigation Project—Riverton Valley Irrigation District ...................................... Basic-per acre ..................... — 17.00 

Southwest Region Rate Table 

Pine River Irrigation Project .............................................................................................. Minimum Charge per tract ... 50.00 50.00 

Basic-per acre ..................... 15.00 15.00 

Project name Rate category Final 2010 

rate 

Proposed 

2011 rate 

Proposed 2012 

rate 

Western Region Rate Table 

Colorado River Irrigation Project * ................... Basic-per acre up to 5.75 acre-feet ............... $52.50 $54.00 To be determined. 

Excess Water per acre-foot over 5.75 acrefeet.17.00 17.00 

Duck Valley Irrigation Project .......................... Basic-per acre ................................................ 5.30 5.30

Fort Yuma Irrigation Project (See Note #2) .... Basic-per acre up to 5.0 acre-feet ................. 86.00 86.00 

Excess Water per acre-foot over 5.0 acrefeet.14.00 14.00 

Basic-per acre up to 5.0 acre-feet (Ranch 5) 86.00 86.00 

San Carlos Irrigation Project (Joint Works) * 

(See Note #3).

Basic-per acre ................................................ 21.00 25.00 $30.00 

San Carlos Irrigation Project (Indian Works) 

(See Note #4).

Basic-per acre ................................................ 57.00 68.00 To be determined. 

Uintah Irrigation Project .................................. Basic-per acre ................................................ 15.00 15.00 

Minimum Bill ................................................... 25.00 25.00 

Walker River Irrigation Project * ...................... Indian per acre ............................................... 19.00 22.00

non-Indian per acre ........................................ 19.00 22.00 

* Notes irrigation projects where rates are proposed for adjustment. 

Note #1—Upon further budget review and subsequent meetings with the water users, BIA revised the O&M rate to $26.00 per acre for FY 

2010 versus the $27.00 per acre that was published in the Federal Register on May 26, 2010 (Vol. 75, No. 101, page 29578). 

Note #2—The O&M rate for the Fort Yuma Irrigation Project has two components. The first component is the O&M rate established by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), the owner and operator of the Project. The BOR rate for 2011 is yet to be determined. The second component is for 

the O&M rate established by BIA to cover administrative costs including billing and collections for the Project. The 2011 BIA rate remains unchanged at $7.00/acre. The rates shown include the 2010 Reclamation rate and the 2011 BIA rate. The rates shown include the estimated FY 

2011 rate. 

Note #3—The 2011 rate was established by final notice in the Federal Register on August 11, 2009 (Vol. 74 No. 153, page 40227). 

Note #4—The 2011 O&M rate for the San Carlos Irrigation Project—Indian Works has three components. The first component is the O&M rate 

established by the San Carlos Irrigation Project—Indian Works, the owner and operator of the Project; this rate is proposed to be $36 per acre. 

The second component is for the O&M rate established by the San Carlos Irrigation Project—Joint Works and is determined to be $25.00 per 

acre. The third component is the O&M rate established by the San Carlos Irrigation Project Joint Control Board and is proposed to be $7 per 

acre. 

Consultation and Coordination With 

Tribal Governments (Executive Order 

13175) 

To fulfill its consultation 

responsibility to tribes and tribal 

organizations, BIA communicates, 

coordinates, and consults on a 

continuing basis with these entities on 

issues of water delivery, water 

availability, and costs of administration, 

operation, maintenance, and 

rehabilitation of projects that concern 

them. This is accomplished at the 

individual irrigation project by Project, 

Agency, and Regional representatives, 

as appropriate, in accordance with local 

protocol and procedures. This notice is 

one component of our overall 

coordination and consultation process 

to provide notice to, and request 

comments from, these entities when we 

adjust irrigation assessment rates. 

Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 

13211) 

The rate adjustments will have no 

adverse effects on energy supply, 

distribution, or use (including a 

shortfall in supply, price increases, and 

increase use of foreign supplies) should 

the proposed rate adjustments be 

implemented. This is a notice for rate 

adjustments at BIA-owned and operated 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

67100 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 210 / Monday, November 1, 2010 / Notices 

1No response to this request for information is 

required if a currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–233, 

expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting 

burden for the request is estimated to average 15 

hours per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to 

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436. 

irrigation projects, except for the Fort 

Yuma Irrigation Project. The Fort Yuma 

Irrigation Project is owned and operated 

by the Bureau of Reclamation with a 

portion serving the Fort Yuma 

Reservation. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

(Executive Order 12866) 

These rate adjustments are not a 

significant regulatory action and do not 

need to be reviewed by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

These rate adjustments are not a rule 

for the purposes of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act because they establish ‘‘a 

rule of particular applicability relating 

to rates.’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(2). 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995 

These rate adjustments do not impose 

an unfunded mandate on State, local, or 

tribal governments in the aggregate, or 

on the private sector, of more than $130 

million per year. The rate adjustments 

do not have a significant or unique 

effect on State, local, or tribal 

governments or the private sector. 

Therefore, the Department is not 

required to prepare a statement 

containing the information required by 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Takings (Executive Order 12630) 

The Department has determined that 

these rate adjustments do not have 

significant ‘‘takings’’ implications. The 

rate adjustments do not deprive the 

public, State, or local governments of 

rights or property. 

Federalism (Executive Order 13132) 

The Department has determined that 

these rate adjustments do not have 

significant Federalism effects because 

they will not affect the States, the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among various levels of 

government. 

Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 

12988) 

In issuing this rule, the Department 

has taken the necessary steps to 

eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, 

minimize potential litigation, and 

provide a clear legal standard for 

affected conduct, as required by section 

3 of Executive Order 12988. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

These rate adjustments do not affect 

the collections of information which 

have been approved by the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget, 

under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. The OMB Control Number is 

1076–0141 and expires December 31, 

2012. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

The Department has determined that 

these rate adjustments do not constitute 

a major Federal action significantly 

affecting the quality of the human 

environment and that no detailed 

statement is required under the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370(d)). 

Information Quality Act 

In developing this notice, we did not 

conduct or use a study, experiment, or 

survey requiring peer review under the 

Information Quality Act (Pub. L. 106– 

554). 

Dated: September 22, 2010. 

Michael S. Black, 

Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27311 Filed 10–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1090 (Review)] 

Superalloy Degassed Chromium From 

Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of a five-year review 

concerning the antidumping duty order 

on superalloy degassed chromium from 

Japan. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted a review 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) 

to determine whether revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on superalloy 

degassed chromium from Japan would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury. Pursuant 

to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested 

parties are requested to respond to this 

notice by submitting the information 

specified below to the Commission; 1 to 

be assured of consideration, the 

deadline for responses is December 1, 

2010. Comments on the adequacy of 

responses may be filed with the 

Commission by January 14, 2011. For 

further information concerning the 

conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207), as most recently amended at 74 FR 

2847 (January 16, 2009). 

DATES: Effective Date: November 1, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On December 22, 2005, 

the Department of Commerce issued an 

antidumping duty order on imports of 

superalloy degassed chromium from 

Japan (70 FR 76030). The Commission is 

conducting a review to determine 

whether revocation of the order would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to the 

domestic industry within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. It will assess the 

adequacy of interested party responses 

to this notice of institution to determine 

whether to conduct a full review or an 

expedited review. The Commission’s 

determination in any expedited review 

will be based on the facts available, 

which may include information 

provided in response to this notice. 

Definitions.—The following 

definitions apply to this review: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of the five-year review, as defined 

by the Department of Commerce. 

(2) The Subject Country in this review 

is Japan. 

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the 

domestically produced product or 

products which are like, or in the 

absence of like, most similar in 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES