alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     ART. 5 FDS FOR 2ND QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>    0000891531                    
<NAME>  Marta Jones                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         32,300
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  287,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    121,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               502,600
<PP&E>                                         503,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,665,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,322,300
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    115,000
<COMMON>                                       300
<OTHER-SE>                                     (83,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,665,400
<SALES>                                        535,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               535,900
<CGS>                                          479,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  479,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               392,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (371,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (49,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (323,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (700)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (324,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (10.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.22)
        


</TABLE>
# International Space Station (ISS)

The main objective of the STS-100 mission, the sixth International Space Station (ISS) assembly flight, was the delivery and installation of the Canadian-built Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS), or Canadarm2. In this photograph, astronaut Chris A. Hadfield, mission specialist representing the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), is seen near the Canadarm2, as the new tool for the ISS grasps the space lab pallet. STS-100 launched April 19, 2001 aboard the Space Shuttle Orbiter Endeavour for an 11 day mission.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-0400013/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJanuary 1, 2001ProducerMSFCSize1920x1267pxPIA Number0400013The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,938
<PP&E>                                           9,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,806
<SALES>                                         53,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,112
<CGS>                                           39,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35
<INCOME-TAX>                                       247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JD RESTORATION INC
, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2415

[ May 16, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CA011733XXXXMB

.

Gray Proctor of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Richmond, Virginia, and Mordechai L. Breier of Consumer Law Office, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Sara M. Sandler and John P. Joy of Walton Lantaff Schroder & Carson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Quiroga v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. , 34 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
September  30,  2000  Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      32,071
<SECURITIES>                             3,953,696
<RECEIVABLES>                              157,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,007
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,560
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           4,140,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,845,827
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 65,805
<COMMON>                                       220
<OTHER-SE>                                 228,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             4,140,250
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           216,857
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               983
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         189,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         21,495
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                21,495
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .770
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .770


</TABLE>
# Make Your Own X-59

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Students

## Grade Levels

Grades K-4, Grades 5-8, Informal Education

## Subject

Physical Science, Spanish, Technology, Flight and Aeronautics, Models

## Type

Hands-on Activities

## Make Your Own X-59

In the Make Your Own X-59 activity, you will make a paper airplane version of the X-59.

**Time:** 20 minutes.

**Materials:**
              - Airplane Template (or 8.5″x11″) piece of paper
              - Scissors
              - Tape

Make Your Own X-59

Make Your Own X-59 (Spanish)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7864
JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY BUCKNER, SR., Service Distributing, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-7865
JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. CRANDALL, (C.O.); LIEUTENANT WILCOX, (O.I.C.); JOHN R. DEWAN, Superintendent; WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL, Defendants - Appellees.2 No. 95-7866
JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusS. R. SMITH, R.N. (at D.M.C.C.); ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden; DEEP MEADOW CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL; DEEP MEADOW CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7867
JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS WAYNE SPINDLE; STAFFORD COUNTY; J. T. DONNELLY, JR., Captain (Chief Jailor); R. M. WILLIAMS, Sheriff, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-95-395-2, CA-95-397-2, CA-95-398-2, CA-95-399-2) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: April 16, 19963 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Alan Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Alan Taylor appeals from district court orders refusing to modify orders imposing partial filing fees. Although the orders are appropriately before us, see Roberts v. United States , 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (orders denying in forma pauperis statusimmediately appealable), we find the appeals meritless. We, therefore, deny in forma pauperis status and dismiss the appeals. The district court assessed partial filing fees in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982). The fees imposed in each case were less than the twenty percent of account deposits allowed by local rule. E.D. Va. R. 28(C)(4). The fees were, therefore, appropriate. Taylor did not pay the fees and objected to the amounts, citing his personal hygiene spending needs and his several federal lawsuits as basesfor lowering the fees. The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the cited bases inadequate to necessitate modification. See Nasim v. Warden, Md. House of Correction, 64 F.3d 951, 954 n.3 (4th Cir. 1995). We deny informa pauperis status and dismiss the appeals. We also deny Taylor's motions for appointment of counsel and to remand the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0001093432
<NAME>        GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     160000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                160000
<PP&E>                                          181187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (122390)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  218797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            42059
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3663
<OTHER-SE>                                      173075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    218797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                729659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (729731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (729731)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6029
JAMES CECIL MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; PHYLLIS ELLIOT; SAMUEL MCCABE; MOHAMMAD BALOCH, Medical Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-658-5-BO) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Cecil Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Freeman , No. CA-94-658-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-30518

Summary Calendar

_____________________

MARTHA ANN FITZGERALD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CALDWELL PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 98-CV-430)

_______________________________________________________

October 19, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-appellant Martha Ann Fitzgerald appeals from summary judgment

against her on her claim for overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29
2

U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA). We agree with the district court and defendantappellee Caldwell Parish School Board that she is an exempt employee under the

short test promulgated by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 213(a). 

See 29 C.F.R. §§ 541.207(a), 541.214; see also Heidtman v. County of El Paso,

171 F.3d 1038, 1041 (5th Cir. 1999) (applying the short test).

As Office Manager, Fitzgerald prepared a multi-million dollar budget,

provided advice regarding the investment of school monies, and managed the school

system’s payroll. As a matter of law, her position’s primary duty was directly

related to the school system’s management policies and general business operations,

and it required the exercise of discretion and independent judgment. Thus, her

position is exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA.

AFFIRMED.
# KSC-02pd0670

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- STS-111 Mission Specialist Franklin Chang-Diaz arrives at KSC aboard a T-38 jet aircraft to take part in Terminal Countdown Demonstration Test (TCDT) activities, along with the Expedition 5 crew, for launch of mission STS-111.  Expedition 5 will travel on Space Shuttle Endeavour to the International Space Station as a replacement crew for Expedition 4.  The TCDT is a rehearsal for launch and includes emergency egress training, familiarization with payload and a simulated launch countdown.  Mission STS-111 is a utilization flight that will deliver equipment and supplies to the Station.  Along with the Multi-Purpose Logisitics Module Leonardo, the payload includes the Mobile Base System, part of the Canadian Mobile Servicing System, or MSS, and an Orbital Replacement Unit, the replacement wrist/roll joint for the SSRMS (Canadarm2).  Launch of Endeavour is scheduled for May 30, 2002

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-02pd0670/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMay 15, 2002ProducerKSCSize1920x1259pxPIA NumberKSC-02pd0670The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								May 19, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Recommendation: 

NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

One Message 

2012-02-05 (EPOC-03) 

The Council recommends that NASA should develop one overarching message under which all 

NASA activities and programs (e.g., Aeronautics) can be integrated and presented to the public. 

All NASA websites, videos, apps, and social media should be consolidated and be organized 

thematically under this message and exposed via www.nasa.gov. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

The public is exposed to NASAactivities through various channels and without a unifying 

conceptual framework, leading to confusion about NASA's identity and purpose. Some 

activities (e.g., Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate) have little public awareness. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Continuing public confusion about NASA's mission and direction, leading to eroding public 

support and marginalization ofNASA's societal value. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs. The Communications community, through the Communications Coordinating 

Council (CCC), has been undergoing intensive strategy review and operational realignment to 

enable NASA to achieve a more cohesive and strategic Communications function. As part of 

this strategy effort, the CCC has developed a Strategic Implementation Plan, which includes a 

focus area devoted to developing strategic themes and messages. The CCC met on 

September 25, 2012, to discuss this NAC recommendation and further develop NASA's 

messaging strategy. 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                815,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    8,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             823,950
<PP&E>                                        70,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               (21,458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               880,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,161,195
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,005
<OTHER-SE>                                  (282,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 880,104
<SALES>                                    4,218,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,218,613
<CGS>                                      4,009,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,207,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (3,998,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3,998,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (3,998,099)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.42)


</TABLE>