alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66787-66788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLAK920000-L14200000-BK0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Alaska.

DATES: The Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage, 
Alaska, must receive comments on or before November 29, 2010. Protests 
of the survey must be filed before November 29, 2010 to be considered.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 W. 7th 
Ave., Anchorage, AK 99513-7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank A. Hardt, 907-271-3182, fax 907-
271-4549, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec8a9e8d8287b3848d9e8898ac8e8081c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99ffebf8f7f2c6f1f8ebfdedd9fbf5f4b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plat and field notes, representing the 
dependent resurvey and subdivision of a portion of U.S. Survey No. 
1170, Alaska Railroad Terminal Reserve, and the dependent resurvey of 
Tract A, U.S. Survey No. 3458, the dependent resurvey of portions of 
numerous U.S. Surveys lying within or adjacent to U.S. Survey No. 1170, 
the survey of portions of three quit claim deeds, the survey of the 
Alaska Railroad Tidelands identified in the Agreement of the Parties in 
United States v. City of Anchorage, et al., Civil No. A-47-65, situated 
in the Municipality of Anchorage within T. 13 N., Rs. 3 and 4 W., 
Seward Meridian, Alaska, was accepted October 15, 2010.
    The plat, in 4 sheets, representing the dependent resurvey and 
subdivision of certain lots within U.S. Surveys No. 1991 and 1992, the 
Exterior Boundaries

[[Page 66788]]

and Subdivision, respectively, of the Unalaska Townsite, situated along 
Iliuliuk Bay in the City of Unalaska, Seward Meridian, Alaska, was 
accepted October 15, 2010.
    The plat will not be officially filed until the day after BLM has 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Authority:  Title VI of Pub. L. 97-468 (96 Stat. 2556; 25 U.S.C. 
176).

    Dated: October 22, 2010.
Frank A. Hardt,
Cadastral Land Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2010-27335 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Blue Origin Tests Five NASA-Supported Technologies

Blue Origin’s New Shepard rocket sits on the launch pad under an early morning cloud filled sky in West Texas.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/blue-origin-tests-five-nasa-supported-technologies-3/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x694pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,640
<SECURITIES>                                    12,553
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,544
<INVENTORY>                                        694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,737
<PP&E>                                          30,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,521
<BONDS>                                             26
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,490
<SALES>                                         16,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,329
<CGS>                                            2,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit






Exhibit 4.6


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO  
A COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 14, 2020
 (the “Purchase Agreement”)


BETWEEN


HERMITAGE OFFSHORE SERVICES LTD.
(the “Company”) 
AND
SCORPIO SERVICES HOLDING LIMITED
 (the “Investor”)


WHEREAS:


		
	(1)
	The Company and the Investor have previously entered into the Purchase Agreement dated January 14, 2020 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit I); and


 
		
	(2)
	The Company and the Investor have agreed to enter into this amendment no. 1 (the “Amendment No. 1”) to amend certain terms of the Purchase Agreement.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Investor hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	With effect from the date hereof:




(a) Section 7.1 (Term, Termination by Mutual Consent) of the Purchase Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 


“Section 7.1. Term
This Agreement shall terminate automatically on the earliest of (i) the date the Company shall have repaid the Facilities, (ii) the date agreed between the Parties and the Company’s Lenders and (iii) the date the Investor shall have purchased or acquired shares of Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement equal to the Aggregate Limit. Subject to Section 7.2 and provided that the Facilities have been repaid or the Company’s Lenders consent in writing, this Agreement may be terminated at any time by the mutual written consent of the Parties, effective on the date of such mutual written consent unless otherwise provided in such written consent, it being hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Investor may not consent to such termination after receipt of a Fixed Request Notice and prior to the corresponding Settlement Date.”; and 
(b) The definition of “Investment Period” in Annex A to the Purchase Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 


““Investment Period” shall mean the period between the Effective Date and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.1 hereof.”


1







		
	2.
	Subject only to the amendments contained in this Amendment No. 1, all terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	Section 9.8 (Governing Law) of the Purchase Agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis to this Amendment No. 1.




[Signature page follows]


2








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed by their respective authorized officer on the 21st day of January 2020.


		
	                                    
	 


	
			
	



HERMITAGE OFFSHORE SERVICES LTD.
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	

By:
	/s/ Cameron Keyser Mackey

	 
	Name: Cameron Keyser Mackey
	 

	 
	Title:   Chief Operating Officer


	 

	 
	 
	 

	SCORPIO SERVICES HOLDING LIMITED

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Eleni Elpis Nassopoulou
	 

	 
	Name: Eleni Elpis Nassopoulou
	 

	 
	Title:   General Counsel
2 min read

# NASA Announces Advanced Composite Research Partnership

### NASA

Sep 23, 2013

RELEASE13-293

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA has selected six companies from five U.S. states to participate in a government-and-industry partnership to advance composite materials research and certification.

The companies are:

• Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. of Fort Worth, Texas• GE Aviation of Cincinnati• Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company of Palmdale, Calif.• Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems of Redondo Beach, Calif.• Boeing Research & Technology of St. Louis• United Technologies Corporation and subsidiary Pratt & Whitney of Hartford, Conn.

They were selected from 20 proposals submitted by teams from industry and academia in response to a call from the Advanced Composites Project, which is part of NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate’s Integrated Systems Research Program. The project sought proposals to reduce the time for development, verification and regulatory acceptance of new composite materials and structures.

A panel of experts from NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory reviewed the submissions and assessed them according to specific criteria. The six firms were chosen for their technical expertise, willingness and ability to share in costs, certification experience with government agencies, focused technology areas and partnership histories.

The first task for the partners is to develop articles of collaboration and establish how the alliance will work and how companies may be added in the future.

For more information about NASA Aeronautics research, go to:

http://aeronautics.nasa.gov

-end-

Michael BraukusHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1979michael.j.braukus@nasa.govKathy BarnstorffLangley Research Center, Hampton, Va.757-864-9886/757-344-8511kathy.barnstorff@nasa.gov
# John Glenn With Nurse Delores O’Hara

Astronaut nurse Delores B. O'Hara, R.N., in the Aeromedical Laboratory at Cape Canaveral, Florida, takes a blood sample from Mercury astronaut John H. Glenn Jr.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/john-glenn-with-nurse-delores-ohara/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x767pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
2 min read

# Nondestructive Evaluation of Adhesive Bond Strength by Ultrasonic Phase Measurements

### Loura Hall

Jul 19, 2016

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Harold Haldren***University of Virginia*

As space technology advances, so does the desire to use lightweight advanced composite structures. Composite structures offer many advantages to their metal counterparts in terms of weight, strength, and durability. However, unlike in metal structures where bolting and riveting are widespread, adhesive bonding is the preferred method to join two composite materials. Consequently, a method to quantitatively determine the strength of an adhesive bond must be used to ensure strength and stability of adhesively bonded structures. Unfortunately, conventional nondestructive evaluation techniques have proved unable to ensure detection of weak bonds or quantitatively measure bond strength.

Therefore, a new nondestructive technique is being proposed for quantitatively measuring adhesive bond strength. This technique uses an ultrasonic signal and an interferometric constant frequency pulsed phased-locked loop (CFPPLL) circuit to measure the phase response of a bonded region due to thermal stress. Theoretical research has shown that the thermal properties of a bonded structure should have a strong relationship with the quality of the adhesive bond. These properties should be measurable using this ultrasonic phase-based technique. Another technique that relies upon the frequency dependence of the reflection coefficient of the bonded interface will also be evaluated using the CFPPLL instrument. The sensitivity of this instrument should also allow it to detect very weak or kissing bonds that have been previously undetectable. Through this research project, these techniques will be developed and tested using a variety of adhesives and bonded materials, and their ability to detect each of the major types of bond defects will be examined. Additionally, the sensitivity of the technique to very thin bonds will be studied. Mathematical models to describe the acoustic responses to stresses in a bonded region are also being developed. Adhesive bonds under failure loads will also be examined for their phase response to ultrasonic interrogation. Computational modeling will be use to verify these results to promote a better understanding of the mechanics of bond failure to physics at large. In the end, this technique has the potential to advance the use of adhesive bonds and by association, advanced composite structures in space technology design by providing a reliable method of quantifiably measuring adhesive bond strength. This innovation would then allow for more complex, lightweight, and safe spacecraft design.

**Back to NSTRF 2016 Full List**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.00
<CASH>                                             9,503
<SECURITIES>                                       1,014
<RECEIVABLES>                                        458
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  11,813
<PP&E>                                            14,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (11,735)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    15,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              9,268
<BONDS>                                            8,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                              23
<OTHER-SE>                                        (2,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      15,618
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     560
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  10,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (488)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (9,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (9,967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                           (679)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (10,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.55)
        



</TABLE>
Order entered December 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 13 - 01465 - CV BARON ABLON, Appellant V. BARI ABLON CAMPBELL, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. P R - 11 - 271 - 1 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s December 2, 2013 Objection to Court’s Order of Mediation to the extent it requests withdrawal of the Court’s mediation order. We VACATE our November 20, 2013 mediation order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NEIL MORRISON.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 215 *N.J.Super.*540)
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  C.E.  Rick
Strattan,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 13, 2005


/s/ C.E. Rick Strattan
--------------------------------------------
C. E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN CHARLES FLETCHER, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 09-6265

(D.C. No. 5:09-CR-00021-M-1)

ORDER

Before TACHA, TYMKOVICH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Defendant John Fletcher appeals the district court’s July 23, 2009 interlocutory order

entered in his criminal case that denied his motion to dismiss for denial of speedy trial.

Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), the ten-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal

in this criminal case expired on August 6, 2009. Defendant filed a pro se notice of appeal

in the district court on November 17, 2009, which was well beyond the ten-day deadline.

Although non-compliance with the time limit in Rule 4(b)(1)(A)(i) is not jurisdictional, the

United States has properly raised the timeliness issue by filing a motion to dismiss. See

United States v. Garduno, 506 F.3d 1287, 1290-91 (10th Cir. 2007); see also United States

v. deShazer, 451 F.3d 1221, 1222 (10th Cir. 2006) (appellate court lacks jurisdiction to

review interlocutory orders of district court refusing to dismiss indictments on speedy trial

Appellate Case: 09-6265 Document: 01018341423 Date Filed: 01/04/2010 Page: 1 
2

grounds).

Accordingly, the United States’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeal is

DISMISSED. All pending motions are DENIED.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-6265 Document: 01018341423 Date Filed: 01/04/2010 Page: 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James C. Flores, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Plains Exploration & Production Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Plains Exploration &Production Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s control over financial reporting; and 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
#### Gaston, Administrator, *v.*Hiatt.—On appeal.

*Friday, November*23.

IP in assumpsit against an administrator on the intestate’s promise, the defendant plead the general issue and *plene administravit,*and the jury find for the plaintiff, — the verdict should state the amount of assets in the hands of the administrator unadministered. *King*v. Anthony, 2 Blackf. 131.