alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard P. Story, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Richard P. StoryRichard P. StoryExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 8, 2004
 69
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV,
L.P. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Kallas, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                                                    |                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
| |                                                                                                                                    | /s/ John Kallas
| |                                                                                                                                   
| | John Kallas
Chief Financial Officer and
Director of Cronos Capital Corp.
(CCC)
Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of CCC
# STS-107 Debris

Overhead image of STS-107 debris layout at Kennedy Space Center.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/sts-107-ksc-debris-layout/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- NASA History
Image CreditCAIB Photo no photographer listed 2003Size720x469pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 11, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michele Ostovar								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45521

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WESLEY ALLEN BOWEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: August 8, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Lemhi County. Hon. Alan C. Stephens, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for aggravated battery, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Wesley Allen Bowen pled guilty to aggravated battery, Idaho Code § 18-907(1)(a). The 

district court imposed a unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement 

of five years. Bowen appeals, contending that the district court erred in failing to retain 

jurisdiction and that the sentence is excessive. 

The primary purpose of the retained jurisdiction program is to enable the trial court to 

obtain additional information regarding the defendant’s rehabilitative potential and suitability for 

probation, and probation is the ultimate objective of a defendant who is on retained jurisdiction. 

State v. Chapel, 107 Idaho 193, 687 P.2d 583 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 
2

567, 650 P.2d 707, 709 (Ct. App. 1982). There can be no abuse of discretion in a trial court’s 

refusal to retain jurisdiction if the court already has sufficient information upon which to 

conclude that the defendant is not a suitable candidate for probation. State v. Beebe, 113 Idaho 

977, 979, 751 P.2d 673, 675 (Ct. App. 1988); Toohill, 103 Idaho at 567, 650 P.2d at 709. Based 

upon the information that was before the district court at the time of sentencing, we hold that the 

district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to retain jurisdiction in this case.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); Toohill, 103 Idaho at 568, 650 P.2d at 710. When reviewing the length of a sentence, we 

consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 

(2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say 

that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bowen’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY T. JAMES.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
- Office of Strategic Infrastructure
- EMD Focus Areas   - Home
  - Environmental Cleanup/Restoration
  - Environment Management System (EMS) / Risk Management
  - Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management
  - Environmental Compliance 
  - National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
  - Energy and Water Management
  - Cultural Resource Management (CRM)
  - Natural Resource Management
  - EMD Sustainability
  - International Programs
- Other Environmental Resources

# 							National Environmental Policy Act						

						The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is a procedural statute that seeks to protect and enhance the quality of the human environment by integrating environmental considerations into the planning of NASA actions as early as possible. ensuring that environment, technical, and economic considerations are weighed during decision making, and completing the NEPA process before taking action.					

## 

### About NEPA

Read More

### NEPA Public Reviews

Read More

### NEPA Library

Read More

### Environmental Justice

Read More

### Updates to NEPA Rule

Read More

### NEPA Team

Read More

### International Programs

Read More

### Space Nuclear System Enable Missions

Read More

## 

## NASA NEPA Final Rule Update: 14 CFR 1216.3

Apr 11, 2024

PDF (258.75 KB)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26961]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2009-0343; FRL-9217-1]


New Mexico: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of New Mexico has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final Authorization to the State of New Mexico. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior 
to the immediate final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by November 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of New Mexico during normal business 
hours at the following locations: New Mexico Environment Department, 
2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-
6303, phone number (505) 476-6035 and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-8533, comments may 
also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier; 
please follow the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the 
immediate final rule which is located in the Rules section of this 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: October 12, 2010.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010-26961 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Three Expedition 69 flight engineers work together

Three Expedition 69 flight engineers work together on a variety of tasks inside the International Space Station's Kibo laboratory module.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss069e061564/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x694pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 11, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27077]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

Place: The Commission's National Office at One Lafayette Centre, 1120 
20th Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3457.

Status: This oral argument will be open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission will be hearing oral argument 
in the case of Secretary of Labor v. AKM LLC d/b/a Volks Constructors, 
Docket No. 06-1990.

Contact Person For More Information: John X. Cerveny, Deputy Executive 
Secretary, (202) 606-5400.

John X. Cerveny,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27077 Filed 10-21-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7600-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,949
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,946
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,415
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             908
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               965
<LOANS>                                        194,431
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,033
<DEPOSITS>                                     280,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,678
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,271
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 314,033
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,870
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,532
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   371
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,773
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,621
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,152
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      260
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,083
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,083
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,760
<LOANS-PAST>                                       214
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,122
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                        52
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,362
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,362
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# STS-124 crew walkout to van

STS124-S-005 (31 May 2008) --- After suiting up, the STS-124 crewmembers exit the Operations and Checkout Building to board the Astrovan, which will take them to launch pad 39A for the launch of Space Shuttle Discovery on the STS-124 mission. On the right (front to back) are astronauts Mark Kelly, commander; Karen Nyberg and Mike Fossum, both mission specialists. On the left (front to back) are astronauts Ken Ham, pilot; Ron Garan, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) astronaut Akihiko Hoshide and Greg Chamitoff, all mission specialists. The STS-124 mission is the 26th in the assembly of the International Space Station. It is the second of three flights launching components to complete JAXA's Kibo laboratory. During the mission, the shuttle crew will install Kibo's large Japanese Pressurized Module and its remote manipulator system. Chamitoff will join Expedition 17 in progress to serve as a flight engineer aboard the station.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts124-s-005/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 26, 2008ProducerJSCSize1345x1920pxPIA NumberSTS124-S-005The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                         9,758,600
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     92,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                      149,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              10,092,300
<PP&E>                                                         1,102,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (282,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                11,539,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          1,229,100
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             13,800
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          14,700
<OTHER-SE>                                                    10,282,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  11,539,900
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 120,900
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,885,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 6,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,770,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,770,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,770,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

The undersigned hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions andresults of operations of the SI Diamond Technology, Inc.

 

| Date:            November 7, 2002 |              /s/ Douglas P. Baker                               Douglas P. Baker      Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
A02A2325.

#### BENHAM v. THE STATE.

(606 SE2d 7)

Decided July 23, 2004.

*Vaughan & Evans, David N. Vaughan, Jr., Lance T. McCoy,*for appellant.

*Bryant G. Speed II, District Attorney, Mary B. Gregoire, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

MIKELL, Judge.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, and in *Benham v. State,*277 Ga. 516 (591 SE2d 824) (2004), reversed the judgment of this Court, after concluding that Benham was denied effective assistance of counsel. Therefore, we vacate our earlier opinion1 and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur.*

1

*Benham v. State,*260 Ga. App. 243 (581 SE2d 586) (2003).