alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco SALAS-CARPINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-10292.

D.C. No. CR-01-01703-RCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2003.

Carin Duryee, USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*830Douglas R. Zanes, Esq., Law Offices of Reyna and Zanes, L.C., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Salas-Carpintero appeals his conviction and 27-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Salas-Carpintero’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. No supplemental pro se brief has been filed. The government did not file a brief.

Because Salas-Carpintero knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal. *See United States v. Nunez,*223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000) (“Generally, courts will enforce a defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal if (1) the language of the waiver encompasses the defendant’s right to appeal on the grounds claimed on appeal, and (2) the waiver is knowingly and voluntarily made.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001
April 20, 2022

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space Policy
Institute, George Washington University Dinner on April 27, 2022

On April 27, 2022, the Space Policy Institute (SPI), George Washington University (GWU), a
nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a dinner at the
DACOR Bacon House in Washington, DC, starting at 6:30 p.m. The guest speaker is Senator
Jerry Moran, United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Approximately 100 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies,
academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all
food and beverages, is $96 per person. SPI is in control of the organizing, planning and
invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements
of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including
NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under
Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests
of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the
individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their
duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the
interests of the SPI/GWU, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating
or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their
local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the “Form 10-Q”) upon my best knowledge and belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.





Dated:  May 10, 2011
/s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. QuiltyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Rialto
CAPITAL(logo)   2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)  Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of September 1, 2014 by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. as Depositor, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association
as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services
LLC as Trust Advisor relating to Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2014-C18 (MSBAM 2014-C18)  The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:  1.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.3.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if
there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    
    Date: March 1,
    2018Adam Singer, Managing Director
**Exhibit 10.12**

 

In October 2002, AetherSystems, Inc. confirmed Michael Mancuso’s placement as Group President ofAether’s Mobile Government segment.  AsGroup President, Mr. Mancuso will receive an annual base salary of $200,000 andwill be eligible to participate in Aether’s employee benefit plans.  In addition, Mr. Mancuso will be eligible toreceive an annual bonus of up to $120,000. The criteria to earn this bonus will be tied to specific revenue growthand EBITDA objectives agreed upon between the parties.

 

The parties also agreed thatMr. Mancuso will be entitled to receive severance in an amount equal to hisbase annual salary in the event he no longer serves as Group President ofAether’s Mobile Government segment as a direct result of a change in control.  It is understood that a change in controlwould occur as the result of the sale of all or substantially all of the assetsof Aether Systems Inc., or all or substantially all of the assets of Aether’sMobile Government segment to one or more individuals, entities, or groups and,as a result, Mr. Mancuso ceases to be employed by Aether and its subsidiaries(except if such termination results from his gross misconduct).

 

In addition, upon a triggeringevent, the parties agreed that all options, restricted stock and other equityinstruments granted prior to July 31, 2002 and held by Mr. Mancuso will becomefully exercisable at the time of termination of his employment withAether.  The parties agreed that a “triggeringevent” will be defined as (i) a reduction in force or layoff at Aether Systems,Inc., if Mr. Mancuso’s employment is terminated as part of such reduction orlayoff, (ii) sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Aether Systems,Inc., or all or substantially all of the assets of Aether’s Mobile Governmentsegment and, as a result Mr. Mancuso ceases to be employed by Aether and itssubsidiaries (except if such termination results from gross misconduct);(iii)  complete or substantiallycomplete dissolution or liquidation of Aether Systems, Inc. or Aether’s MobileGovernment segment and, as a result  Mr.Mancuso ceases to be employed by Aether and its subsidiaries (except if suchtermination results from gross misconduct); (iv) any person or group acquiresor attains ownership of more than 50% of the Aether’s outstanding common stock;(v) completion of a merger or consolidation of the Aether Systems, Inc. with orinto any other entity unless Aether’s stockholders retain control of the newentity.

 

This agreement does not changeMr. Mancuso’s status as an at-will employee.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 5, 2012

s1128

Order 

December 5, 2012

144930

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144930

COA: 307968

Wayne CC: 08-010774;

DAVID BLAKE HUDSON, 08-013877

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. With regard to the motion for 

relief from judgment that was denied by the Wayne Circuit Court on June 14, 2011, the 

defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 

6.508(D). With regard to the motion for relief from judgment that was denied by the 

Wayne Circuit Court on August 2, 2011, the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment 

is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
# Sitemap

## September 08, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 09
- September 08, 2014

            - NASA Selects U.S. Firms to Provide Commercial Suborbital Flight Services
            - NASA Launches New Era of Earth Science from Space Station
            - Future Space Station Crew to Participate in NASA TV Briefing, Media Interviews
            - Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi NPP)
            - F-104 Starfighter
            - NASA Talk Explains How To Make a Tornado
            - Space Station Sensor to Capture ‘Striking’ Lightning Data
            - Scientists Find Evidence of ‘Diving’ Tectonic Plates on Jupiter’s Moon Europa
            - NASA Astronaut Tim Kopra Trains For Station Mission
            - Expedition 46/47 Spacewalk Training Session
No. 87-1353.

#### King et ux. *v.*Reliance Insurance Co.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Psyche Comes Together

In this image from July 18, 2023, a NASA team helps attach solar arrays for the agency’s Psyche spacecraft onto a stand inside the Astrotech Space Operations Facility near Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/ksc-20230718-ph-ilw01-0234orig/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x694pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 28, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Martek Biosciences
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof:  a)
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended April 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
andb)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.Henry Linsert, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences
Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2019

No. 04-18-00929-CV

IN RE Tracey MURPHY,

Appellant

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-04-00091-CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Relator’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing is GRANTED. 

Time is extended until January 14, 2019.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 23, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOEL T. STRINGFELLOW, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 09-7086

(D.C. No. 6:08-CR-00052-FHS-1) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-7086 Document: 01018372364 Date Filed: 02/23/2010 Page: 1
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Division**

----

****

----

**The Apollo 15 Flight JournalDavid Woods and Frank O'BrienAdditional work by Ken Glover, Joseph O'Dea, Kipp Teague, Lennie Waugh and Robin Wheeler.**

----

*Apollo 15 Flight Journal*
Apollo Flight Journal

Like its companion, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, it is intended to be a resource for all those interested in the Apollo program, whether in a passing or scholarly capacity.

This journal covers the flight of Apollo 15, eventually from launch to splashdown. As a living document, it will continue to grow and evolve and major changes will be intimated in the appropriate internet groups.

Journals for other Apollo flights are available at the AFJ Portal.

----

Foreword
Bibliography and Links
Acknowledgements
Journal Preparation

----

##### Travelling from the Earth to the Moon

- Launch and Reaching Earth Orbit
- Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection
- Transposition, Docking and Extraction
- SPS Troubleshooting and the PTC
- Day 2: Checking the SPS
- Day 2: Entering the LM
- Day 3: Flashing Lights
- Day 3: Leaking Water and the Top of the Hill
- Day 4: Lunar Encounter

##### In the Vicinity of the Moon

- Day 4, part 2: Lunar Orbits 1 & 2
- Day 4, part 3: The Descent Orbit
- Day 5, part 1: Waking in the Descent Orbit
- Day 5, part 2: Trimming the Descent Orbit
- Day 5, part 3: Activating the Lunar Module
- Day 5, part 4: "We didn't get a Sep"
- Day 5, part 5: CSM Circularisation
- Day 5, part 6: Preparations for Landing

##### The Solo Mission of *Endeavour*

- Day 5, part 7: Solo Orbital Operations - 1
- Day 6: Solo Orbital Operations - 2
- Day 7: Solo Orbital Operations - 3
- Day 8, part 1: Solo Orbital Operations - 4

##### Final Days in Lunar Orbit

- Day 8, part 2: Rendezvous and Docking
- Day 8, part 3: Leaking Tunnel and Jettison of the LM
- Day 9, part 1: Orbital Science and Crew Rest
- Day 9, part 2: Orbital Science, Rev 62 to 64
- Day 10, part 1: Orbital Science, Rev 68 & 69
- Day 10, part 2: Orbital Science, Rev 70
- Day 10, part 3: Orbital Science, Rev 71
- Day 10, part 4: Orbital Science, Rev 72

##### Homeward to Earth

- Day 10, part 5: Subsatellite Launch
- Day 10, part 6: Trans-Earth Injection
- Settling down for the Journey Home
- Day 11, part 1: Cislunar Science & the Sphere of Influence
- Day 11, part 2: Worden's EVA
- Day 11, part 3: UV Photography & P23s
- Day 12, part 1: P23s & UV Photography
- Day 12, part 2: Lunar Eclipse & a Press Conference
- Day 12, part 3: P23s & More Cislunar Science
- Day 13, part 1: Approaching Earth
- Day 13, part 2: Entry & Splashdown

----

#### Supporting Information

- Index of Journal Explanations
- Index of Flight Images
- Apollo 15 Flight Summary
- Apollo 15 Documents
- Video Index

AFJ portal.

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### These files are copyright © 1998-2021. W. David Woods and Frank O'Brien.

----
- Home
- NASA’s SpaceX Crew-2…

Commercial Space

- CCP Home
- About CCP
- Current/Upcoming Missions   - SpaceX Crew-8
  - Boeing Crew Flight Test
- CCP Blog
- Multimedia   - NASA Image Library
  - Flickr
- Media Resources

# 							Crew-2						

						On April 23, 2021, NASA astronauts Shane Kimbrough and Megan McArthur, ESA (European Space Agency) astronaut Thomas Pesquet, and JAXA (Japaen Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Akihiko Hoshide launched  from NASA Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39A to the International Space Station on the agency’s SpaceX Crew-2 mission – the second operational mission for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.					

## Resources Archive

## 				Videos/B-roll			

## Shane Kimbrough Interview

Watch this interview reel of Crew-2 Spacecraft Commander Shane Kimbrough.

## Megan McArthur Interview

Watch this interview reel of Crew-2 Pilot Megan McArthur.

## Akihiko Hoshide Interview

Watch this interview reel of Crew-2 Mission Specialist Akihiko Hoshide.

## Thomas Pesquet Interview

Watch this interview reel of Crew-2 Mission Specialist Thomas Pesquet.

## Photos

Browse through imagery from and related to NASA's SpaceX Crew-2 mission.

### Crew-2 Seated Inside Dragon

View or download this photo of the Crew-2 astronauts seated inside SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.

View Now

### Crew-2 Group Portrait

View or download this group portrait of the Crew-2 astronauts.

View Now

### Crew-2 Flickr Album

View the Crew-2 photo album on Flickr.

View Now

## 				Additional Resources			

## Crew-2 Mission Overview

Read more about NASA's SpaceX Crew-2 mission.

## NASA's SpaceX Crew Rescue and Recovery

Read more about SpaceX's crew rescue and recovery operations.

## Shane Kimbrough Bio

Read more about Crew Dragon Commander Shane Kimbrough.

## Megan McArthur Bio

Read more about Crew Dragon Pilot Megan McArthur.

## Akihiko Hoshide Bio

Read more about Mission Specialist Akihiko Hoshide.

## Thomas Pesquet Bio

Read more about Mission Specialist Thomas Pesquet.

## Crew-2 Launch Timeline

View or download the launch timeline for NASA's SpaceX Crew-2 mission.

## Crew-2 Launch to Docking Timeline

View or download the timeline for docking to the International Space Station.

## Crew-2 Return Timeline

View or download the timeline for NASA's SpaceX Crew-2 return to Earth.

To download the mission patch, follow this link: https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/spacex-crew-2-official-insignia/
**EXHIBIT 31.01**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)I, Henry Linsert, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Martek Biosciences Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 9, 2005By /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.Henry Linsert, Jr.