alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 12 2010, Aldrich Chemical Company Inc., DBA Isotec, 3858 Benner Road, Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-4304, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
IMethaqualone (2565)
IIbogaine (7260)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine (7396)
IPsilocyn (7438)
INormorphine (9313)
IAcetylmethadol (9601)
IAlphacetylmethadol except levo-alphacetylmethadol (9603)
INormethadone (9635)
INorpipanone (9636)
I3-Methylfentanyl (9813)
I( print page 65659)Amphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIAmobarbital (2125)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IISecobarbital (2315)
II1-Phenylcyclohexylamine (7460)
IIPhencyclidine (7471)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
II1-Piperidinocyclohexanecarbonitrile (8603)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIEthylmorphine (9190)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIIsomethadone (9226)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMeperidine intermediate-A (9232)
IIMeperidine intermediate-B (9233)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone intermediate (9254)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk, (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
IILevo-alphacetylmethadol (9648)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances to produce isotope labeled standards for drug testing and analysis. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than December 27, 2010. Dated: October 19, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-27018 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Nevada and Placer Counties Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nevada and Placer Counties Resource Advisory Committee 
(RAC) will meet in Auburn, California. The committee is meeting as 
authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss 
projects submitted for funding and the expenditure of Title II funds 
benefiting National Forest System lands in Nevada and Placer Counties.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, November 5, 2010 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Placer County Water Agency 
office, 144 Ferguson Rd., Auburn, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Westling, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Tahoe National Forest, 631 Coyote St., Nevada City, CA 95959, 
(530) 478-6205, E-Mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f697819385829a9f9891b69085d8909392d88385"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="39584e5c4a4d5550575e795f4a175f5c5d174c4a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Welcome and Introductions; (2) Review of RAC Operating Guidelines; (3) 
Discussion of Proposed Projects; (4) Vote on Proposed Projects; and (5) 
Comments from the Public. The meeting is open to the public and the 
public will have an opportunity to comment at the meeting.

    Dated: October 18, 2010.
Jeanne Pinch-Tulley,
Fire Management Officer and Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-26728 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion issued September 15, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00114-CV

———————————

CHRISTINA LIVINGSTON, Appellant

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION FANNIE MAE, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1055552

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Christina Livingston, has filed an appeal from the trial court’s January 

26, 2015 judgment. The trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record on March 30, 2015, and 

the reporter’s record was filed on May 19, 2015. Appellant’s brief was therefore due on 

June 18, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 
2

As of June 24, 2015, appellant failed to timely file a brief, and on that date the 

Clerk of this Court notified appellant that failure to file a brief or a motion for extension 

by July 6, 2015, could lead to dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 

42.3(b). To date, no brief has been filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.
# Sitemap

## 2007

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2007

            - January
            - February
            - March
            - April
            - May
            - June
            - July
            - August
            - September
            - October
            - November
            - December
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1657

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT

To amend section 44921 of title 49, United States Code, 

to provide for the arming of cargo pilots against terrorism.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1657 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. ARMING CARGO PILOTS AGAINST TERRORISM. 

2 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con3 gress that members of a flight deck crew of a cargo air4 craft should be armed with a firearm and taser to defend 

5 the cargo aircraft against an attack by terrorists that 

6 could result in the use of the aircraft as a weapon of mass 

7 destruction or for other terrorist purposes. 

8 (b) ARMING CARGO PILOTS AGAINST TERRORISM.—

9 Section 44921 of title 49, United States Code, is amend10 ed—

11 (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘passenger’’ 

12 each place that it appears; 

13 (2) in subsection (k)(2) by striking ‘‘flight or,’’ 

14 and all that follows through ‘‘command’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘flight or any other flight deck crew member’’; 

16 and 

17 (3) by adding at the end of subsection (k) the 

18 following: 

19 ‘‘(3) ALL-CARGO AIR TRANSPORTATION.—In 

20 this section, the term ‘air transportation’ includes 

21 all-cargo air transportation.’’. 

22 (c) TIME FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—In carrying out 

23 the amendments made by subsection (b), the Under Sec24 retary for Border and Transportation Security of the De25 partment of Homeland Security shall ensure that pilots 

26 of both passenger and cargo aircraft are treated equitably 
3

S 1657 RFH 

1 in receiving access to training as Federal flight deck offi2 cers. 

3 (d) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.—The requirements of 

4 subsection (c) shall have no effect on the deadlines for im5 plementation contained in section 44921 of title 49, 

6 United States Code, as in effect on the day before the date 

7 of enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate November 10, 2003. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Martek Biosciences
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof:  a)
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
July 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: September 14, 2004 /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.  Henry Linsert, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences
Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ALEXANDER ROCHINSKY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*525)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0001]


Risk Communication Advisory Committee; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment 
to the notice of meeting of the Risk Communication Advisory Committee. 
This meeting was announced in the Federal Register of September 20, 
2010 (75 FR 57279). The amendment is being made to reflect a change in 
the Agenda portion of the document. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee L. Zwanziger, Office of Policy, 
Planning and Budget, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 3278, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-9151, FAX: 
301-847-8611, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5f7e6e4e6e5c3c1c48bcdcdd68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9ebfaf8faf9dfddd897d1d1ca97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC 
area), code 8732112560. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 20, 
2010, FDA announced that a meeting of the Risk Communication Advisory 
Committee would be held on November 8 and 9, 2010. On page 57280, in 
the first column, the Agenda portion of the document is changed to read 
as follows:
    Agenda: On November 8 and 9, 2010, the Committee will hear and 
discuss developments in FDA's ongoing communications programs, such as 
FDA's Strategic Plan for Risk Communication, FDA's Transparency 
Initiative, foodborne outbreaks and related recall communications, and 
the challenges of effectively communicating with patients and 
caregivers about appropriate use of medical devices when a patient is 
prescribed a medical device for home use.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-27060 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-51037

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jimy Marin Reyes-Almendarez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-1059-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jimy Marin Reyes-Almendarez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Almendarez has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion 

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set 

forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 13, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-51037 Document: 00515978559 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2021
No. 20-51037

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 

42.2.

Case: 20-51037 Document: 00515978559 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2021
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
  
  **Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
  In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc W.
Eller, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
report.
  
  Date:      
      May 3, 2005
    /s/ Marc W. Eller
      Marc
      W. Eller
      Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 30, 2020

NO. 03-19-00352-CV

Stetson Roane, Appellant

v.

Halcy Martin Dean, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN;

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on May 3, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s interlocutory order 

denying Stetson Roane’s plea to the jurisdiction and renders judgment granting his plea and 

dismissing Halcy Martin Dean’s claim. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
# Sitemap

## November 26, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 11
- November 26, 2014

            - Where Are They Now: X-15A-2
            - International Space Station’s 3-D Printer
            - NASA Coverage Set for Fifth SpaceX Resupply Mission to Space Station
            - NASA Coverage Set for Fifth SpaceX Resupply Mission to Space Station
            - Hubble Sees a Slashing Smudge Across the Sky
            - International Space Station’s 3-D Printer
            - Sols 823-825: Brushing off the dust at Alexander Hills
#### DEBORAH O’NELL v. STOCK ENTERPRISES, INC., AND/OR PLAYPEN LOUNGE.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
NASA

Radioisotope Power Systems

Skip Navigation
menuclose modal

## STEM

# 2024 Winners of the Power to Explore Challenge

More ›
More

            -  Perseverance 
            -  Voyager 145+ Years in Space 
            -  Voyager 245+ Years in Space 
            -  New HorizonsNew Horizons: Mission Elapsed Time
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARIUS DAY.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 216 *N.J.Super.*33)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Shipbuilding Research Program (“NSRP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Austal USA, Mobile, AL, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NSRP intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 13, 1998, NSRP filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 19, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2010 (75 FR 35089).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-26743 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# Sitemap

## May 31, 1997

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1997
- 05
- May 31, 1997

            - Cassini Processing and Launch Gallery
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 177 

Expressing support for the designation of Clergy Spouse Appreciation Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. RICHMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of Clergy Spouse 

Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the church is where the community of saints assemble together to cultivate, nurture, and enhance a concrete 

spiritual connection between God and man that ultimately leads to advancing the minds and improving the 

lives of those in the community; 

Whereas the clergy are God’s authorized representatives, 

whose mission is to create an atmosphere of unity, love, 

and hope in an otherwise oppressed and chaotic community; 

Whereas the clergy extend themselves to organize, promote, 

and influence programs and activities that create that atmosphere of unity, love, and hope; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 177 IH 

Whereas the clergy spouse has accepted the challenge to work 

alongside God’s ambassador as the spouse carries out the 

assigned mission of educating and equipping the community with the necessary tools to enhance their living 

standards; 

Whereas the nature of the service provided by the clergy and 

their spouses is unique, as they are entrusted with the 

spiritual well-being of the flock, thereby creating a positive impact on their respective communities; 

Whereas the dedication and sacrifice provided by the clergy 

spouses to improve the quality of life for their community 

is immeasurable; 

Whereas a day in recognition of the contributions of the clergy spouses would highlight their dedication by increasing 

awareness of the many service programs organized and 

executed by the more than 200,000 clergy spouses in the 

United States; and 

Whereas the third Sunday in October would be an appropriate date to designate as Clergy Spouse Appreciation 

Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of Clergy Spouse Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS