alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4761

_____________________________ A RTIS L ORENZO H ARRISON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. July 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Artis Lorenzo Harrison, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### LOUISE AUGER v. THE GIONTI AGENCY AND THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 218 *N.J.Super.*360)
# Zero Gravity Facility

The Zero Gravity Facility is NASA's premier facility for conducting ground-based microgravity research. The facility is used by investigators from around the world to study the effects of microgravity on physical phenomena such as combustion, fluid physics, biotechnology, and materials science. 						Microgravity, a condition of relative near weightlessness, can only be achieved on Earth by putting an object in a state of free fall. The Zero-G facility allows experiment hardware to free fall a distance of 432 feet and provides researchers with a near weightless or microgravity environment for a duration of 5.18 seconds.

**CLICK Anywhere To Start Tour**

    Zero-G: Main Floor

    Zero-G: Vacuum Chamber

    Zero-G: Control Room

# 

Touch and drag to view the 360-degree image
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Winston M. Talbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plains Exploration & Production Company; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ Winston M. TalbertName: Winston M. Talbert Title: Chief Financial
Officer


Date: September 22, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 14

- 00641

- CV

Robert MARX and Debbie MARX,

Appellants

v.

FDP, LP

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 03

- 0101

- CVW

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellants Robert and Debbie Marx.

SIGNED August 19, 2015.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S E DG WI C K C L AI MS MANA GE ME NT S E R V I C E S , I N C ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. R OB E R T A. DE L S MAN, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 16809 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 4 6 8 - SBA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S aundr aB r ow n A rm s tr ong, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S edgw i ck C l ai m s M anagem entS ervi ce s, Inc. appeal s f rom the di stri ct c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g its a c tio n a lle g in g , in te ra lia , d e f a m a tio n a n dtr a d e lib e l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , P ri ce v. 

# FI LED MA R 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16809 2 Stosse l , 6 2 0 F .3 d9 9 2 , 9 9 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) , an dw e a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed S edgw i ck’ s def am at i on and tra de l i bel claim s u n d erC alifo rn ia’s an ti -S L A P P statu te b ec au se d ef en d an t D elsm an ’s c onduc tw a s i n f

urthe r a nc e of

hi s f r e e s pe e c h r i ght s i n c onne c t i on w i th an i s s ue of p ub lic in te r e s t, an dS e d g w ic kd idn o t m e e t its b u r d e n o f e s tab lis h in g ap r o b ab ility o f p r e v a ilin g o n its c la im s . See C a l. C iv . P r o c . C o d e § 4 2 5 .1 6 ; R ui zv . H ar bor V i ew Cm t y. A ss ’n , 3 7 C a l. Rp tr . 3 d1 3 3 , 1 4 0 - 4 6 ( C t. A p p . 2 0 0 5 ) ( s e ttin g f o rth § 4 25 . 16 anal ys i s, and con clud i ng thatdefe nd ant ’ s l ett ercont ai ni ng rhet ori ca l hyperbol e w as fr ee spee ch i n con nect i on w i th an i ss ue of pu bl i c i nt er es tand that pl ai nt i ff di d n otes t abl i sh a probabi l i ty of pre vai l i ng on hi s l i bel cl ai m ). S edgw i ck’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
#### PANELCLAD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FALCON STEEL STRUCTURES, INC.; et al., Defendants, v. Falcon Steel Structures, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-31247.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2003.

Marie Healey, Daniel Alan Smith, Healey & Smith, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George Davidson Fagan, Leake & Andersson, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Schirra Leaves Hangar S for the Pad

Astronaut Walter M. Schirra Jr., pilot of the Mercury-Atlas 8 (MA-8) Earth-orbital spaceflight, leaves Hanger "S" at Cape Canaveral on his way to his scheduled Oct. 3, 1962, flight.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/schirra-leaves-hangar-s-pad/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x747pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 

 

Aether Opensky InvestmentsLLC

Aether Capital, L.L.C.

Aether European HoldingsB.V.

 

Aether Europe B.V.

Cerulean Technology, Inc.

Sunpro, Inc.

 

Sinope Corporation

AS Mexico LLC

AS Monterey LLC

 

RTS Wireless, Inc.

RTS Wireless InternationalLimited (UK)

RTS Wireless InternationalLimited (Hong Kong)

 

NetSearch, LLC

 

Sila Communications Limited

Nimbus bright

Sila Management ServicesLimited

Aether IFX LLC

Sila Group (Holdings)Limited

Sila Communications Sweden

Sila Communications BenelusBV (Netherlands)

Sila Communications SA(Spain)

Sila Technology Limited

IFX Infoforex

Sila Communications (UK)Limited

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41329

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus 

JORGE LUIS GUTIERREZ-QUINTANILLA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-121-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Government has filed an unopposed motion to summarily

affirm Jorge Luis Gutierrez-Quintanilla’s conviction and

summarily vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing in

light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 127 S. Ct. 625 (2005), and United

States v. Estrada-Mendoza, 475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2007). The

motion is GRANTED, the conviction is AFFIRMED, the sentence is

VACATED, and the case is REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          454,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    151,000
<COMMON>                                    31,966,600
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,572,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (47,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, Clerk's No. -<br><br>against<br><br>Tariek Steele, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered September 14, 2012, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of resisting arrest, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered September 14, 2012, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. The authorized arrest element of resisting arrest (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 205.30; <i>People v Sumter, </i>151 AD3d 556, 557 [2017]) was sufficiently charged by way of allegations establishing probable cause to arrest defendant for disorderly conduct (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 240.20) and/or utilizing a sound device without a permit in violation of New York City Administrative Code section 10-108(d). The instrument alleged that on a specified date and time, on Broadway and West 34th Street, defendant and a codefendant utilized a sound device without the requisite permit, resulting in music being heard from one block away, and a crowd gathering. Contrary to defendant's claim, the People were not required to allege whether he acted as a principal or accomplice (<i>see People v Rivera</i>, 84 NY2d 766, 769 [1995]; <i>People v Delacruz</i>, 247 AD2d 223 [1998], <i>lv denied </i>91 NY2d 1006 [1998]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: May 17, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### K.M., Mother of L.B., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 5D09-2726.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 25, 2010.

K.M., Ocala, pro se.

Kelly A. Swartz, of Children’s Legal Services, Rockledge, for Appellee.

Wendie Michelle Cooper, Tavares, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

K.M., the mother of L.B., appeals an order terminating her parental rights.1 K.M. is proceeding pro se.2 We have carefully considered K.M.’s arguments and thoroughly reviewed the record. Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

1

. The father's parental rights were terminated in the same order. The father had tendered and the trial court accepted his surrender of all parental rights to L.B.

2

. The mother proceeds pro se because her court-appointed attorney withdrew on the ground that a thorough, conscientious, and good faith review showed no meritorious grounds on which to base an appeal, citing *N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs.,*843 So.2d 898 (Fla.2003). Otherwise, the mother at all times was represented by court-appointed counsel.
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Planetary Protection Procedural Requirements Document 

for Human Extraterrestrial Missions 

2012-03-04 (SC-Ol) 

Recommendation: 

The NASA Advisory Council recommends that NASA develop the appropriate implementing 

document to specify plaoetary protection procedural requirements for hurnao extraterrestrial 

missions at a level corresponding to the current COSPAR (Committee on Space Research) 

plaoetary protection policy, aod update it as new knowledge becomes available. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

NASA Policy Directive 8020.7G on "Biological Contamination Control for Outbound aod 

Inbound Plaoetary Spacecraft" requires the development of detailed documents delineating the 

staodards aod procedures implementing compliaoce with plaoetary protection staodards aod 

procedures for humao spaceflight missions. Currently, however, no such documents exist for 

humao missions. 

Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 

NASA will be out of compliaoce with its own policy requirements as it plaos the prominent 

flagship missions ofhumao exploration aod with international agreements to which the U.S; is 

a party. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs. A core team is now in place aod has been briefed on the task of creating the 

subject NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) document. The core team consists of 

representatives from: 

Humao Exploration aod Operation Mission Directorate 

Advaoced Exploration Systems Division 

Exploration Systems Development Division 

Space Life aod Physical Sciences Research aod Applications Division 

Strategic Analysis aod Integration Division 

Science Mission Directorate 

Plaoetary Protection Officer 

Office of the Chief Health aod Medical Officer 

Office of Chief Scientist 

Office of the General Counsel 

Office of International aod Interagency Relations 

This team will draft, review, aod revise, as appropriate, ao NPR document over the course of 

the next calendar year. NASA has significaotly contributed to the large body of prior work on 

this subject, aod the team comprises a number of individuals responsible for that work. 

Enclosure 
2 

We intend to execute the following tasks over the course of calendar year 2013. In the first 

quarter, a draft NPR will be developed. Key reviewers have been identified, and subsequent 

edits will be adjudicated and incorporated; An early draft NPR is currently in work. In 

parallel, the team will prepare required supporting materials. During the second quarter, the 

review will be broadened to the NASA stakeholder base. Comments and concerns will be 

identified, and vetted responses will be incorporated into the draft NPR and supporting 

materials. The third quarter will be allotted for the NPR to be submitted to and reviewed within 

the NASA Online Directives Information System. Final approval and circulation for signatures 

will be sought in the fourth quarter. 

The team is ready to brief this approach at the request of the Council or any of its Committees 

or Subcommittees. The draft document will be available for briefing in the summer 2013 time 

frame.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERHARD J. SWEETMAN.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60588 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TRECE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:99-CR-108-ALL

-------------------- August 7, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Coghlan, appointed counsel for Trece Clark, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and the record and Clark's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Clark's motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
# Sitemap

## December 25, 2021

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2021
- 12
- December 25, 2021

            - James Webb Telescope Begins Its Journey
            - NASA’s Webb Telescope Launches to See First Galaxies, Distant Worlds
# Crew on-orbit portrait in U.S. Lab

S114-E-6751 (2 August 2005) --- The STS-114 crewmembers pose for an in-flight portrait in the Destiny laboratory of the International Space Station. From the left (front row) are astronauts Andrew S. W. Thomas, mission specialist; Eileen M. Collins, commander; and Soichi Noguchi, mission specialist representing Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). From the left (back row) are astronauts James M. Kelly, pilot; Charles J. Camarda, Stephen K. Robinson, and Wendy B. Lawrence, all mission specialists.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s114e6751/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 2, 2005ProducerJSCSize1920x1271pxPIA Numbers114e6751The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before November 26, 2010 to be assured of consideration.

## Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)

*OMB Number:*                     1535-0141.                

*Type of Review:*                     Revision of a currently approved collection.                

*Title:*                     Investigative Forms.                

*Form:*                     PD F 5518, 5519, 5520, and 5521.                

*Abstract:*                     Information requested is in support of background investigations conducted by the Bureau of the Public Debt.                

*Respondents:*                     Individuals and Households.                

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     361 hours.                

*Bureau Clearance Officer:*                     Bruce Sharp, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106; (304) 480-8112.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-7873.                

Dawn D. Wolfgang,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-27083 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P