alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Scott and Another *v.*Herald.

Suit on the assignment of a promissory note. The declaration averred that the plaintiff had sued the maker; that the latter had obtained judgment on account of the want of consideration for the note; and that notice of the suit against the maker had been given to the indorsor, &c. Motion by the now defendant in the Circuit Court to stay proceedings until a writ of error which had been taken to said judgment, and which was shown by affidavit to bo pending in the Supreme Court, should be determined. *Held,*that the motion should be granted.

ERROR to the *Knox*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit brought by *Herald*as indorsee against *Scott*and *Wise*as indorsers of certain promissory notes. The declaration contains several counts, the fifth and sixth of which allege, *inter alia,*that the plaintiff had sued the makers of the notes, and had been defeated on the ground that the notes were made without consideration; that when ■said suits on the notes were commenced, the now defendants, *Scott*and *Wise,*had notice thereof; that they employed counsel to advise with the plaintiff’s counsel in the management of those suits; and that their counsel advised with the plaintiff’s counsel in every stage of the suits, and approved of all the proceedings therein on the plaintiff’s part, &c.

At the first term after the declaration was filed, the cause was continued. At the next term, the defendants showed to the Court by affidavits, that, since the last continuance, writs of error to the judgments relied on in the fifth and sixth counts of the declaration had been issued, and were then pending in the Supreme Court; that errors had been assigned, and appearances entered, &c. Upon these affidavits, accompanied by the transcripts of the suits in error, the now defendants, *Scott*and *Wise,*moved the Court to stay further proceedings in this cause against them, until the determination of the suits in error. The motion was overruled.

We think this motion should have been sustained. The *130plaintiff could not recover on the fifth and sixth counts, whilst suits in error on the judgments described in those counts were pending. If those judgments should be affirmed, the plaintiff may introduce them in evidence on the trial, acdording to what is said in *Howell*v. *Wilson,*2 Blackf. 418. And see *Blasdale*v. *Babcock,*1 Johns. *517.*— Barney v. *Dewey,*13 Johns. 224. But it would, of course, be otherwise, should the judgments be reversed.

*J. Law*and /. *Whitcomb,*for the plaintiffs.

*S. Judah,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00441-CR

IN RE NELSON PARNELL, JR.

Original Proceeding

ORDER REQUESTING A RESPONSE

Nelson Parnell, Jr.’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed on December 23, 2016. 

The Court requests a response from the other parties to the proceeding. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(b). Any response shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than 21 days 

from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Response requested

Order issued and filed January 11, 2017
Space Vehicle Mockup Facility

#
# Melissa Jones

Division Chief, Operations and Test Management, Exploration Ground Systems

## Contents

            -  Experience 
            -  Education 
            -  Awards 
            -  Personal 

Melissa Jones currently serves as division chief of Operations and Test Management for the Exploration Ground Systems Program at NASA’s John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Jones is responsible for all staffing, resources, and facilities used for flight hardware processing, launch, and recovery for Artemis missions. 

## Experience

Jones most recently served as the NASA Landing and Recovery director for the first Artemis mission, where she partnered with the U.S. Navy to recover the Artemis I Orion crew module from the Pacific Ocean. Prior to that, Jones served as the lead system engineering and launch site integration manager for the Ground and Mission Operations division of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. Her responsibilities in this position included leading the spacecraft production effort, integrated system’s verification testing across elements, and hardware and operations readiness for the launch site. She also was the design requirement owner for all landing requirements levied on the NASA commercial partners, including contingency operations and medical requirements at landing.

She joined NASA’s human spaceflight effort in 2004 as a contractor on the Space Shuttle Program and moved to NASA in 2007 as the lead orbiter project engineer on space shuttle Endeavour. Her primary responsibility in this position was to get the Endeavour vehicle ready to fly from a requirements management and testing perspective.

## Education

Jones is a graduate of the University of Central Florida in Orlando, earning a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering in 2003 and a master’s degree in engineering management in 2016. 

## Awards

Jones is a 2017 Rotary National Award for Space Achievement Stellar Award Nominee.

## Personal

Jones is a native of Florida, where she lives with her husband Paul, her two children, Bailey and Les, and her dog, Domino. Her hobbies include kickboxing, reading and home improvement projects.

*Biography last updated February 2023*
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (MANAGER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


     The undersigned  officer of Crusade Management Limited, a company organized
under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby certifies on behalf
of CML and on his own behalf for  purposes of the Crusade  Global Trust No. 1 of
1999 Class A Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I  am  duly   authorized  to  execute  and  deliver  this   Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and

     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied with all
           conditions and covenants  under the  Transaction  Documents,  for the
           Crusade  Global  Trust No. 1 of 1999  issue of Notes  for the  period
           between  October 1, 2002 and the end of the Manager's  fiscal year on
           September 30, 2003.

     Capitalized  terms used and not  defined  herein  shall  have the  meanings
assigned  to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced
issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 24, 2004.


                                         /S/  G.M. BARTLETT
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         By:     G.M. Bartlett
                                         Title:  Director
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1679

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 

recovery period for roof systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2003

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the depreciation recovery period for roof systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Realistic Roofing Tax 

5 Treatment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR ROOF SYS7 TEMS. 

8 (a) 20-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Paragraph (3) of 

9 section 168(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re-
2

•S 1679 IS 

1 lating to classification of certain property) is amended by 

2 adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(F) 20-YEAR PROPERTY.—The term ‘20-

4 year property’ includes any roof system.’’. 

5 (b) REQUIREMENT TO USE STRAIGHT LINE METH6 OD.—Paragraph (3) of section 168(b) of such Code is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara8 graph: 

9 ‘‘(G) Any roof system.’’. 

10 (c) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 

11 section 168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by adding 

12 at the end the following new item:

‘‘(F) ....................................................................................... 20’’.

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40138

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

ALVARO GUTIERREZ-CARDONA, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1315-1 

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alvaro GutierrezCardona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez-Cardona has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 19, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40138 Document: 00513959221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2017
No. 16-40138

2 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40138 Document: 00513959221 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2017
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cozumel Corporation  (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the year  ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Jehu Hand, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jehu Hand

By: Jehu Hand

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

October 14, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas C. BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-4005.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 2003.

Decided Sept. 11, 2003.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Karen B. George, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Clayton Bailey was convicted of embezzling labor organization funds, or aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), 29 U.S.C. § 501(c) (2000), and making a false statement of material fact on a labor organization report, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 439(b) (2000). Bailey appeals his convictions and sentence. We affirm.

First, Bailey asserts the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We review this claim to determine whether, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, any reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Bailey’s claim is meritless. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, proved each element of Bailey’s offenses. *See In re Winship,*397 U.S. 358, 364, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970).

Second, Bailey asserts the district court erred in enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice, based on Bailey’s testimony regarding several deposits he made. We review a district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines enhancement for obstruction of justice for clear error. *287
      *United States v. Puckett,*61 F.3d 1092, 1095 (4th Cir.1995). The district court did not clearly err in determining Bailey’s testimony was false on material matters or that it supported an enhancement for obstruction of justice. *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(b)) (2002); *United States v. Dunnigan,*507 U.S. 87, 92-98, 113 S.Ct. 1111, 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993); *United States v. Jones,*308 F.3d 425, 428 n. 2 (4th Cir.2002), ce*rt. denied,*537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1372, 155 L.Ed.2d 211 (2003); *United States v. Hairston,*46 F.3d 361, 375 (4th Cir.1995).

Accordingly, we affirm Bailey’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
---

---

Exhibit 10.1



FIRST AMENDMENT TOVENTURE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO VENTURE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (the "Amendment") is dated as of ___________________, 200__.

RECITALS



|A. | Article XIII of the Venture Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") provides that the Plan may be modified or amended by the Board of Directors of Venture Financial Group, Inc.
("Venture").
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|B. | On September 14, 2005, the Board of Directors of Venture approved amendments to the Plan.                                                                                                                         
|  
|C. | Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning attributed to such terms in the Merger Agreement.                                                                                           
|  

AMENDMENT



|1. | Sections 6.9 and 7.9 of the Plan are amended to change the termination date of an Optionee's Options following the Optionee's death from 12 months to 6 months following the Optionee's death.                                                                        
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | Sections 6.10 and 7.10 are amended to change the termination date of an Optionee's Options following the Optionee becoming Disabled from 12 months to 6 months following the Optionee becoming Disabled.                                                              
|  
|3. | This Amendment is effective as of the date hereof and is hereby incorporated into the Plan. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full force and effect and
are not amended or modified in any respect.
|  

DATED as of and approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of Venture at a meeting held on September 14, 2005.

23

---

---
Document

LIMITED WAIVER OF BASE SALARY AGREEMENT
This Limited Waiver of Base Salary Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of this 25th day of March 2020 by and between Liquidity Services, Inc. (the “Corporation”), and the undersigned executive officer of the Corporation (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Corporation is taking numerous proactive steps to mitigate the negative financial and operational impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic;
WHEREAS, these business contingency plans include, among other steps, implementing remote and virtual work plans, cancelling non-essential travel and spending, reducing the pay of employees, shortening work weeks, and furloughs; 
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive and the Corporation have entered into an Executive Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned Executive has voluntarily agreed to allow the Corporation to reduce his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the period of time from April 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 (the “Covered Period”).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the Executive agree to the following:
1.  Term. This Agreement shall be in force and effective throughout the Covered Period.
2.  Reduced Base Salary During the Covered Period. The Executive hereby voluntarily agrees to the Corporation reducing his prorated monthly base salary by Fifty Percent (50%) for the Covered Period.  Such a reduction shall not be deemed a breach of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement.  Executive and the Corporation further agree that the foregoing does not lower base salary for any other purpose under Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation, including, without limitation, the calculation of any severance payment in the event of a termination.
3.  Miscellaneous. To the extent not subject to federal law, this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and each of their respective affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns. This Agreement is not intended to amend or otherwise change or modify the terms of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement with the Corporation except as expressly set forth herein.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and the Executive have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.








																					
							
	EXECUTIVE				LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.		
							
	/s/ Mark Shaffer
						
	

Name: Mark Shaffer               _____________
				By:		/s/ William P. Angrick, III

				



		 William P. Angrick, III
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 


Capturing Decadal Survey Lessons Learned 2011-03-01 (SC-Ol) 


Recommendation: 

NASA should request a formal examination by the National Research Council (NRC) of 


the lessons learned, from the perspective ofthe National Academies, from recent NASA­


related decadal surveys. Planning for this examination should be initiated after the 


release of the Heliophysics Decadal Survey in early 2012, and this examination should 


make recommendations about the next cycle ofdecadal surveys, which will begin circa 


2015. 


Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 


Lessons learned, from NASA's perspective, are being captured. But the lessons learned, 


from the perspective ofthe National Academies, are also vital to maintaining the 


importance and continued value ofthe decadal surveys. 


Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 


The collection and examination oflessons learned will become more difficult with the 


passage oftime, and the failure to capture these lessons could adversely affect the 


importance and continued value offuture decadal surveys. 


NASA Response: 


NASA concurs with this recommendation. The Science Mission Directorate has had 


initial discussions with the NRC about a workshop exploring decadal survey lessons 


learned. The focus and scope ofsuch a workshop will be determined. The Space Studies 


Board has suggested November 2012 for a workshop, but optimal timing for the activity 


will depend in part on the release and assessment ofthe impacts ofthe new Heliophysics 


survey, which is presently under development and projected for completion in March 


2012.
- Home
- Learning Resources
- In-Flight Education Downlinks

- In-Flight Downlinks Home
- Downlink Schedule
- Apply for a Downlink

# In-Flight Education Downlinks

Connect your students with astronauts aboard the space station for a live question-and-answer session about living and working in space.

## 

#### 

#### 

## 

### Watch Past Downlinks

View a playlist of all our previous Downlinks.

Watch

### View Downlink Schedule

Check out the schedule of upcoming Downlinks.

Learn More

### Apply for a Downlink

This opportunity is available to both formal and informal U.S.-based education organizations. 

Learn More

## Latest Downlink News and Features

				All                			

News Release3 Min Read
New York Students to Hear from NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station

News Release2 Min Read
Texas Students to Hear from NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station

News Release3 Min Read
NASA Astronauts to Speak with North Carolina, Virginia Students
News Release2 Min Read
NASA, International Astronauts to Speak with Tennessee Students

## STEMonstrations

Have you ever wondered what kind of STEM activities occur on the International Space Station? Follow astronauts as they demonstrate STEM concepts such as Newton’s Laws of Motion, surface tension, advances in technology and more.
View Resources

## 				Discover More Topics From NASA			

## Communicating With Space

Astronauts communicate with Earth by sending data through a set of satellites to antennas on the ground.

## Space Communications and Navigation

NASA's Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) program sponsors various educational programs, projects, and travelling exhibits. 

## How Do Astronauts Stay In Touch with Earth?

Mission Control is home to many different players in many different positions that support the astronauts while they're out on the field. Communication is important, but how exactly do they stay in touch?

## Build a Communications Satellite

Play this game to build a satellite that helps send information from other spacecraft to Earth.

## Amateur Radio on the International Space Station

ARISS lets students worldwide use radio science technology to experience the excitement of talking directly with crew members of the International Space Station. 

## Search Other Space Station-Related Resources

Explore more Space Station-related content with our STEM search.
- Station Home
- Overview   - Station Overview
  - International Space Station Reference
  - Station Assembly Elements
  - Ground Facilities
  - International Cooperation
  - Station Facts
  - Station Visitors
  - Station Record Holders
  - Reference Guide to the International Space Station (PDF)
  - Station Lithograph (PDF)
- Station Topics   - Your Orbiting Laboratory
  - International Space Station Expeditions
  - Visiting Vehicles
  - Station Spacewalks
- Multimedia   - Space Station Imagery
  - Space Station Videos (YouTube)
- News Releases
- Station Blogs

## Expedition 28 News Releases

Space Station Trio Lands Safely In KazakhstanSept. 16, 2011 – Three International Space Station crew members safely returned to Earth Friday, Sept. 16, wrapping up a six-month mission of research and exploration.

NASA Astronaut Ron Garan Available For Media InterviewsSept. 16, 2011 – NASA astronaut Ron Garan will be available for live satellite interviews one week after returning to Earth from 6 to 7:30 a.m. CDT on Thursday, Sept. 22.

International Space Station Partners Set Tentative Launch ScheduleSept. 15, 2011 – NASA and its international partners have agreed to a tentative launch schedule with crew flights to the International Space Station resuming on Nov. 14.