alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### GE & 0 EXAS

February 11, 1953

Hon. R. A. Weinert Opinion No. S-04 Chairman Senate State Affairs Com- Re: Constitutionalitvof the mittee Fifty-third Legislature Austin, Texas

Dear Sir: provision in SenateBill 98, 531-d Legislature, authorizingBoards of Trustees of independent school-distribtsto appoint tax assessor-collectors for a term of officenot to exceed three years. Yo'u have requested an opinion concerning the constitutionalityof SenateBill 98, 53rd Legislature, a.uthorizing

Boards of Tr,ustees of an independentschool district to appoint a tax assessor-collectorfor a term of office not to exceed three years.

Section 16 of ArticleVII of the Constitution of Texas provides:

“The Legislature shall fix by law the terms of all offices of the public school system and of the State institutionsof higher education, inclusive,and the terms of members of the respectiveboards,not to exceed six years."
In construing this provision it was held in Popham v. Patterson, 121 Tex. 615, 51 S.W.2d 680 (1932) that since the office of co,unts superintendentwas purely statutory the Legislaturehad the authority to fix the term of office of county school superintendent at any period not exceed six years. Since the office of tax assessor and collector for independent school districts is purely statutory (Articles2758, 2779, and 2791,V.C,S,) it is our opinion that the case of Popham v. Patterson is applicable to Senate Bill 98.

Therefore, the Legislature is a,uthorized to prescribe any term for the office of tax assessor and collector of independent school districtsnot to exceedHon. R. A. Weiner, page 2 (S-04)

six years. Senate Bill.98 providesfor a term of office not to exceed three years and is therefore constitutional. SUMMARY

The provisionof SenateBill 98, 53rd Legislature, authorizingBoards of Trustees of independentschool districts to appoint tax assessor-collectorfor a term of office not to exceed three years is constit,utional. Tex. Const. ArticleVII, Sec. 16.
Yo'urs very truly,
APPROVED:
J. C. Davis, Jr. County AffairsDivision JOHN BEN SHEPPERD Attorney General

Willis E. Gresham Reviewer By Bi!$%%kAssistant Robert S. Trotti First Assistant JohnBen Shepperd Attorney General
BEL:am
EXHIBIT 11.2

                    COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)


                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                 December 31,
                                                              ------------------
                                                               1997        1996
                                                               ----        ----
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                          15,994      12,903
Additional shares assuming exercise 
  of stock options                                               574         561
                                                              ------      ------

Weighted average shares outstanding                           16,568      13,464
                                                              ======      ======

Net Income                                                    $3,656      $1,568
                                                              ======      ======

Diluted Earnings Per Share                                    $ 0.22      $ 0.12
                                                              ======      ======
                                       14
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald R. Spoehel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.



Date: November 5, 2004



|       |  |                                                               
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ George J. Pedersen                                        
|Name:  |  | George J. Pedersen                                            
|Title: |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Ronald R. Spoehel                                         
|Name:  |  | Ronald R. Spoehel                                             
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=7342
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD, STARITA , and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Jackson D
. PACE Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 22 00025

_________________________ Decided: 19 May 2022 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Nicholas S. Henry Sentence adjudged 29 October 2021 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 37 days , 1 and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Major Brian L. Farrell , USMC

1 Appellant was credited with having served 7 days of pretrial confinement.United States v. Pace , NMCCA No. 20 22 00025 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignmen t of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant ’s substantial rights occurred. 2 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
# Larry J. Cliatt II

NASA Armstrong Aerospace Engineer

## Contents

            -  Experience 
            -  Education 

Larry J. Cliatt II is an aerospace engineer and sub-project manager in the Aerodynamics and Propulsion branch at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. Appointed in 2023, he manages the acoustic validation phase of NASA’s Quesst mission, which is when the sonic thump of the X-59 will be measured to validate the prediction tools used to build the quiet supersonic flight research aircraft.

## Experience

As a principal investigator, Cliatt led several NASA sonic boom flight research efforts, including the Farfield Investigation of No-boom Thresholds (FaINT), Waveforms and Sonicboom Perception and Response (WSPR), and Quiet Supersonic Flights 2018 (QSF18) projects.

Cliatt’s career with NASA began as a cooperative engineering student in 2006 at Armstrong. That year, he also interned at Bell Helicopter as a flight test engineer. In 2007, he was hired as a full-time aerospace engineer at Armstrong and since then, has specialized in sonic boom flight research and high-speed aerodynamics.

Cliatt is a graduate of NASA FIRST (Foundations of Influence, Relationships, Success, and Teamwork), an esteemed agency leadership development program. Among his many honors are a NASA Early Career Achievement Medal in 2012 and NASA Group Achievement awards for the Schlieren Project Team in 2016, the Sonic Boom Team in 2012, and the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) Initial Science Flight Team in 2011. He also received an Award for Academic Excellence from the Office of Minority Educational Development at Georgia Institute of Technology in 2003 and is a long-standing member of the National Society of Black Engineers.

Cliatt has authored or co-authored several papers about aircraft shock-wave measurement, most recently “Lessons Learned from Sonic Boom Flight Research Projects Conducted by NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center” in 2020, “Mach Cutoff Analysis and Results from NASA’s Farfield Investigation of No-boom Thresholds” in 2016, and “Finding the Boom: Phased Array Processing Applied to Sonic Boom Direction of Arrival Estimation” in 2016.

## Education

Cliatt earned a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science in aerospace engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, in 2004 and 2007, respectively.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CLAYTON POWELL.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### The First National Bank of Ludington v. William M. Dwight, Alfred A. Dwight, David E. Wilson, William A. Luther, and Robert M. Wilson.

*Bills and notes*— Service *of process*— Judgment.

The makers and indorsers of a promissory note resided in different counties, and were joined as klefendants in a suit upon the note brought in the county in which the indorsers resided, and where they were served with declaration. And it is held that a subsequent service of the declaration upon the makers in the county in which they resided, under How. Stat. § 7316, authorizing such service in the case of joint defendants in certain cases, would not authorize a joint judgment against the parties, the case being ruled by *Church v. Edson,*39 Mich. 113.

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.)

Argued April 14, 1891.

Decided May 8, 1891.

*Assumpsit.*Defendants Dwight bring error. Judgment *510as to appellants set aside. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Bowen, Douglas & Whiting,*for appellants.

Morse, J.

The plaintiffs sued the defendants in the Ionia circuit court upon promissory notes, of which the defendants Dwight were makers, in the name of William M. Dwight & Co., and the other defendants were indorsers, under the name of Wilson, Luther & Wilson.

The suit was commenced by declaration, which was served upon the indorsers in Ionia county. On the filing of the return of this service by the sheriff of Ionia county, copies of the declaration were sent to Wayne county, and there served upon the Dwights by the sheriff of that county. The default of the defendants was after-wards duly taken, and a judgment entered against all of them jointly.

The ' defendants William M. Dwight and Alfred A. Dwight come to this Court on writ of error, • alleging that there has been no legal service upon them. There is no appearance by the appellee in this Court. The case is ruled by *Church v. Edson,*39 Mich. 113. The judgment against the Dwights, is unwarranted, and must be vacated and set aside, with costs of this Court.

The other Justices concurred.
# Spacelab

In this photograph, astronauts Owen Garriott on the body restriant system and Byron Lichtenberg prepare for a Vestibular Experiment during the Spacelab-1 mission. The Vestibular Experiments in Space were the study of the interaction among the otoliths, semicircular canals, vision, and spinal reflexes in humans. The main objective was to determine how the body, which receives redundant information for several sensory sources, interprets this information in microgravity. Another objective was to record and characterize the symptoms of space sickness experienced by crewmembers. The body restraint system was a rotating chair with a harness to hold the test subject in place. The crewmember wore an accelerometer and electrodes to record head motion and horizontal and vertical eye movement as the body rotated. The first Spacelab mission, Spacelab-1, sponsored jointly and shared equally by NASA and the European Space Agency, was a multidisciplinary mission; that is, investigations were performed in several different fields of scientific research. The overall goal of the mission was to verify Spacelab performance through a variety of scientific experiments. The Spacelab-1 was launched aboard the Space Shuttle Orbiter Columbia for the STS-9 mission on November 28, 1983. The Marshall Space Flight Center had management responsibilities for the mission.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-8440005/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 1, 1983ProducerMSFCSize1255x1920pxPIA Number8440005The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 10, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# grc_aerial_0

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/grc_aerial_0-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- WebMod Grandfathered
Size3600x2403pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 25, 2022								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Augmented Search for Small Asteroids 

2013-01-04 (SC-02) 

Recommendation: 

The augmented ground-based search for a small asteroid meeting the requirements ofNASA's 

Asteroid Initiative should be formulated broadly to increase the rate of discovery ofsmall 

asteroids that could threaten Earth. 

Major Reasons for Proposing the Recommendation: 

While prioritizing the search for a target asteroid, any effort expended on a wider search would 


increase the Initiative's contribution to Planetary Defense. 


Consequences of No Action on the Proposed Recommendation: 


Loss of an excellent opportunity for the Initiative to make a larger contribution to national 


priorities regarding Planetary Defense. 


NASA Response: 


NASA concurs. NASA's plans for implementing the enhanced asteroid detection and 


characterization activities called for in the President's FY 2014 budget request are being 


formulated with this broader goal in mind. In addition to finding asteroids of appropriate size 


in support ofNASA's Asteroid Retrieval Mission, NASA will also be discovering near-Earth 


asteroids ofmuch larger size, thereby increasing the overall rate ofdiscovery. 


Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1663 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 354
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1663

                          [Report No. 108-179]

       To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2003

   Mrs. Dole introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

                            October 30, 2003

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The 2 maps subtitled ``NC-07P'', relating to the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal Barrier 
Resources System Cape Fear Unit NC-07P, that are included in the set of 
maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources System'' and referred to in 
section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), 
are hereby replaced by 2 other maps relating to those units entitled 
``Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear Unit, NC-07P'' and dated 
February 18, 2003.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

                                                       Calendar No. 354

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1663

                          [Report No. 108-179]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

       To replace certain Coastal Barrier Resources System maps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 30, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT

—————————————————

IN RE ARDELL REAY and SUSAN 

REAY,

 Debtors.

__________________________________

ARDELL REAY and SUSAN REAY,

 Appellants,

 v.

DAVID L. MILLER, Trustee, and ZIONS 

FIRST NATIONAL BANK,

 Appellees. 

BAP No. UT-10-035

Bankr. No. 10-21698 

Chapter 7 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

July 22, 2010

—————————————————

The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) filed by 

Appellants Ardell Reay and Susan Reay on July 22, 2010.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion is GRANTED. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(c)(2); 10th Cir. 

BAP L.R. 8016-4(a)(8).

(2) Any deadlines previously set by the Court are VACATED.

(3) This appeal is DISMISSED.

(4) The mandate shall issue immediately. A certified copy of this Order 

shall constitute the mandate on appeal.

BAP Appeal No. 10-35 Docket No. 14 Filed: 07/22/2010 Page: 1 of 2
2

For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court

By:

Gregory Wright

Deputy Clerk

BAP Appeal No. 10-35 Docket No. 14 Filed: 07/22/2010 Page: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Caspian Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kerry Doyle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: January 15, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Kerry Doyle                      |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Kerry Doyle, Chief Executive Officer |