alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from Clinton Engineering Works in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Clinton Engineering Works.                    

*Location:*                         Oak Ridge, Tennessee.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All guards and service workers who worked in or around the warehouses at the Elza Gate area.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1943 through May 18, 1947.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-27597 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
MANUEL VICENTE ANTUNA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2881 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; John L. Burns, Acting Circuit Judge. Manuel Vicente Antuna, pro se. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KELLY, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
#### Dare and Another *v.*Spencer and Another.

If a person undertake to make a steam-engine for two partners to be of certain dimensions and of the best quality, and one of the employers after-wards cause the patterns, about to be used for the castings for the engine, to be altered; and the castings be made according to the altered patterns;'the undertaker will not be responsible for the sufficiency of the engine.

Monday, *May*24.

ERROR to the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

.The plaintiffs brought an action of debt against the defendants 'on a promissory note. Pleas, 1. *Nil debent;*2. Failure of consideration. After the plaintiffs closed their testimony, the defendants proved that the note sued on was given in part consideration of a steam-engine to be constructed by the plaintiffs for the defendants. The engine was to be of certain dimensions, and when finished was to be of the “ best quality.” It was also proved, that when the plaintiffs commenced constructing the engine, one of the defendants went to the shop of the plaintiffs and proposed to alter the patterns about to be used, saying that he was acquainted with such machinery, and that he wanted the engine made to suit himself; that the patterns were thereupon altered to suit the wishes of defendant, and the castings were made according to the patterns so altered by him, he being present almost the whole time, and superintending the work. It was further proved that the engine was not good, in consequence of a defect in the patterns, but no defect in the *material*was shown or alleged. When the testimony was closed, the Court instructed the jury that the change of the patterns by the defendants should have no bearing in the case, that the plaintiffs were bound to make an engine according to the original contract, notwithstanding the direction of the defendants to the contrary. To that instruction the plaintiffs excepted. Judgment for the defendants.

The plan on which the engine was agreed to be constructed was liable to be altered at any time by consent of the parties, just as any other contract may, at any time before forfeiture, be changed by the contracting parties. The plaintiffs were ready to perform the original contract in good faith, and would, it may be, have so performed it, had *492not the defendants desired a change. To disallow the act of defendants would, under the circumstances, be a fraud upon the plaintiffs. The defendants .were partners, and the act one changing the contract was the act of both. .According to the original contract, the plaintiffs were bound to construct an engine for the defendants that would be useful and answer the purpose intended, but *by*changing the patterns, and causing the engine to be constructed upon a plan of their own, the workmen’s skill was superseded by the judgment of their employers. In such a case the workman is not responsible. *Duncan*v. *Blundell,*3 Stark. R. 6. The instruction of the Court, therefore, was erroneous.

*A. S. While*and *R. A. Lockwood,*for the plaintiffs.

*J. Pettit,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is *reversed*with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER ADOPTING RULE S 490.2 AND

790.2 AND AMENDING RULES 320, 490,

790, AND 791 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA

RULES OF C RIMINAL PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

: NO. 547

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of June , 202 3 , upon the recommendation of the Criminal

Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been published for public comment at

51 Pa.B. 5587 ( September 4, 2021 ) :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule s 490.2 and 790.2 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure are adopted

in the attached form and Rules 320, 490, 790, and 791 of the Pennsylvania Rules of

Criminal Procedure are amended in the attache d form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be

effective April 1 , 202 4

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edwin R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
       or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
       the Report.


/s/ Edwin R. Maus
-----------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003



                                       27
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 303 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 303

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 2, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Estes of Kansas.
     Committee on Small Business: Mr. Estes of Kansas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# RS-25 Engine Test — Powering NASA’s #JourneytoMars

Watch the LIVE RS-25 Engine Test. Go to www.nasa.gov/nasatv & www.ustream.tv/nasahdtv

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/rs-25-engine-test-powering-nasas-journeytomars/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x544pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
ROY D. BRIDGES, JR.

NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER)

Roy D. Bridges, Jr., was Director of NASA’s Langley Research Center, 

Hampton, Virginia, from August 10, 2003 until October 3, 2005. He plans to 

retire from NASA at the end of the year to pursue other interests. He is currently 

conducting a study for NASA’s Associate Administrator on the headquarters’ 

function that integrates institutional plans and budgets for all of NASA’s Centers.

As the senior management official of the laboratory employing approximately 

2,100 civil service and 1,800 contractor personnel, Bridges was responsible for 

the Center’s aeronautical and space research programs, as well as facilities, 

personnel, and administration. He was also an advisor to the NASA 

Administrator on Agency programs.

Bridges came to Langley in 2003 after serving as Director of NASA’s John F. 

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) for over six years. In that capacity, he was 

responsible for managing facilities and activities related to the processing and launch of the Space Shuttle, processing and 

integration of Shuttle payloads and those aboard Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELVs), as well as final tests and preparation 

of elements delivered to the International Space Station via Shuttle. He was also responsible for managing the acquisition 

and launch of all NASA ELV missions.

Bridges is a retired U.S. Air Force Major General who has held many key space-related roles. Prior to his last USAF 

assignment at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, he was the Commander, Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards Air Force 

Base, California. He also was the Commander, Eastern Space and Missile Center, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, and 

Commander, 412th Test Wing, Edwards Air Force Base, California.

As a NASA Astronaut, he piloted the Space Shuttle Challenger on mission STS-51F in July 1985.

Bridges is a distinguished graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado, where he earned a 

bachelor’s degree in engineering science. He received a Master of Science degree in astronautics from Purdue University, 

Indiana, and, in May 2001, he received an honorary doctorate of engineering degree from Purdue.

He is the recipient of numerous awards and honors. Most recently, he was awarded NASA’s Outstanding Leadership Medal 

and the Presidential Meritorious Executive Award.

Bridges was born in Atlanta, Georgia, but grew up in Gainesville, Georgia. He lives in Williamsburg, Virginia, with his 

wife, Benita.

OCTOBER 2005

This is the only version available from NASA. Updates must be sought direct from the above named individual.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Biographical Data

 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

 Houston, Texas 77058
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 18, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL SESARIO DePINEDA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID MICHAUD, Chair,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1022

(D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00022-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1022 Document: 01018369355 Date Filed: 02/18/2010 Page: 1
August 21, 2007 

The Honorable Alberto R. Gonzales 

Attorney General of the United States 

Department of Justice 

Washington, DC 20530 

REF: Executive Order 13392 – Improving Agency Disclosure of Information 

Dear Mr. Attorney General: 

In accordance with Executive Order 13392, “Improving Agency Disclosure of 

Information,” NASA completed its review of its Agency’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 

process and developed an FOIA Improvement Plan (see Appendix A). However, we’ve 

determined that an additional modification is necessary concerning our procurement of 

commercial developed FOIA database software. Therefore, we’ve updated our current plan with 

the attached modification. 

 NASA will continue to support the President’s FOIA initiatives and work to improve 

public accessibility to Agency records. 

 Sincerely, 

 Original Signed 

 David Mould 

 Chief Freedom of Information Act Officer 

cc: 

The Honorable Rob Portman 

Director, Office of Management and Budget 
2

Executive Order 13392 – Improving Agency Disclosure of Information 

In accordance with Executive Order 13392, “Improving Agency Disclosure of Information,” the 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have updated its original FOIA 

Improvement Plan, dated June 13, 2006. 

Appendix A: (Modification 2) 

Change to read – 

1) Name: FOIA Database

2) Brief statement of goal sought: Replace current FileMaker Pro database with an 

established commercial-based system which will allow the public to access and 

track the current status of its FOIA request. 

3) List of all distinct steps planned to be taken: Interview vendors and evaluate their 

FOIA database systems for procurement. 

4) Time milestones: Initial milestone - No later than December 31, 2007, for the 

review and decision of which commercial package to procure; have the new 

system up and operational no later than September 30, 2008, for implementation 

for FY09. 

5) Means of measurement of success: Procuring the commercial program and 

having it available for testing and use during FY08. 

Justification – 

This agency’s FOIA office established an adhoc group to evaluate commercial FOIA database 

products. During the past fiscal year this group completed this review process, and 

recommended to continue with the procurement process. This recommendation would replace 

our agency current FOIA database with one that would allow web access to the public. 

However, during the evaluation process it was noted the need to conduct a testing phase of this 

commercial purchased software to ensure operability within our 13 decentralizes FOIA 

Requester Service Centers and our supporting Information Technology office. Also our goal 

date of September 30, 2007 was found to be unrealistic under our current budgetary restrains and 

has been pushed to be funded during our FY08 budget cycle.
Reply to Attn of: 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Langley Research Center 

100 NASA Road 

Hampton, VA 23681-2199 

January 13, 2020 

30/ 

TO: Distribution 

FROM: Chief Counsel 

SUBJECT: Ethics Determination Regarding NASA Employee Attendance at Virginia 

Aviation, UAS & Aerospace Legislative Reception, Richmond, Virginia, 

January 29, 2020 

On Wednesday, January 29, 2020, the Virginia Aviation Business Association, the Virginia 

Department of Aviation, Signature Flight, The Virginia Center for Unmanned Systems at CIT, 

Science Applications International Corporation, Virginia Space and other sponsors will host a 

reception at Main Street Station in Richmond, Virginia. The organizers expect 

approximately 450 individuals to attend, including state and local officials, community 

leaders, representatives of the aerospace industry, and about 50 NASA employees. The 

reception will include food and beverages at an estimated cost of about $40 per person. 

In accordance with 5 C.F.R. §2635.204(g) and 14 C.F.R. §1207.103, I find that the event 

meets the definition of a "widely attended gathering." I also find that there is an Agency 

interest in having NASA personnel attend this event, as it will further agency programs and 

interests. NASA invitees will have the opportunity to discuss the Administration's activities 

in Virginia, and exchange information on NASA programs. I further conclude that NASA's 

interest in its employees attending this event outweighs any concern that attendance may 

appear to improperly influence NASA personnel in the performance of their official duties. 

Accordingly, NASA employees who have been invited to attend may accept free attendance 

at the reception. 

NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending sensitive matter that will 

substantially affect the interests of the hosts, and NASA employees who have non-career 

political appointments, are not covered by this determination and should seek a determination 

from their ethics counselor regarding their participation in this event. 

Questions about this determination may be addressed to Kenneth Goetzke, at 757-864-7390. 

al .J/J 

l~U-~ 

Charles A. Polen 

Chief Counsel and 

Deputy Designated Agency Ethics Official
##### **Exhibit 99.2**

 

# **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

 

I, Robert D. McDermott,Chief Financial Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the “Registrant”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)          the QuarterlyReport on Form  10-Q of the Registrant,to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);and

 

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date:    | May 15, 2003 |                     | By: | /s/ Robert D. McDermott |
|-------------------------|--------------|--------------------------|-----|-------------------------|
|                    |         | Robert D. McDermott,     |
|                    |         | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the Company) Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Kevin M. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2006



|       |  |                                                               
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ GEORGE J. PEDERSEN                                        
|Name:  |  | George J. Pedersen                                            
|Title: |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ KEVIN M. PHILLIPS  
|Name:  |  | Kevin M. Phillips      
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



31