alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Space Biosciences Division
- Who We Are   - Bioengineering Branch (SCB)
  - Flight Systems Implementation Branch (SCF)
  - Space Biosciences Research Branch (SCR)
  - Division Management
- What We Do
- Research   - Research
  - Education
  - Information for Researchers
  - Publications
- Contacts
- More   - Ames Science Directorate
  - Ames Research Center  Information for Researchers  				Learn More about Opportunities for Space Research			ISS National Laboratory
The International Space Station National Laboratory is a functioning research laboratory with the tools and facilities needed to translate traditional ground-based experiments into flight-ready payloads.
NASA Solicitation and Proposals
All research funding opportunities are managed through the NASA Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review Evaluation System, also known as NSPIRES.
NASA Task Book
Publicly accessible searchable database listing NASA-funded grants in Space Biology, Physical Sciences, and Human Research.
Open Science
Access spaceflight associated omics datasets in GeneLab, space-relevant higher-order phenotypic datasets in the Ames Life Science Data Archive (ALSDA). Spaceflight and correlated ground studies tissues are also available for investigation through NBISC and the Biospecimen Sharing Program.
NASA Life Science Publications
Explore hands-on activities, interactive, lesson plans, educator guides, and other downloadable content about this topic.
Training & Education
Program information about internships for high school students, to graduate and post-doctoral fellowship opportunities, to learning how to design spaceflight experiments for researchers.
  Keep ExploringDiscover More Topics From NASANASA Biological & Physical Sciences
BPS administers NASA’s: BPS partners with the research community and a wide range of organizations to accomplish its mission. Grants…

International Space Station

Human Research Program

Ames Research Center
      The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 16, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Elizabeth E. Keller								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000891915
<NAME> RECONDITIONED SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,091,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,257,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (32,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    922,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,337,219
<PP&E>                                         509,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                (365,237)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,670,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          688,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,586,982
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,605,041)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,670,505
<SALES>                                      8,317,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,317,781
<CGS>                                        6,399,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,550,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,252)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                766,387
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            766,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   766,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00752

- CR

Warren Randall Hughes, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PETER T. CLAUSEN.

February 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2048

MARK BLAIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAVENSWOOD VILLAGE HEALTH CENTER, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1256-6) Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Mark Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Rodney Lloyd Bean, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mark Blair appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blair v. Ravenswood , No. CA-97-1256-6 (S.D.W. Va. June 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILE AS PART OF
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                       748
<INVENTORY>                                     81,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,499
<PP&E>                                         147,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           857
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,154
<SALES>                                        215,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,750
<CGS>                                          143,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (357)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,739
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Jason Washington, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00162

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 114th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 114

- 0773

- 12 ). Memorandum Opinion d elivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to d elete the $300.00 assessment of attorney’s fees, leaving $354.00 as the total amount of court costs to be
imposed

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Jason Washington, has adequately indicated his inabili ty to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 8, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garrett Thornburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/  Garrett Thornburg 

 

 

Garrett Thornburg 

Chief Executive Officer 

August 18, 2003
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P.



|                                           |  |             
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|Name                                       |  | Jurisdiction
|Atlas Pipeline Operating Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Pipeline New York, LLC               |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Ohio, LLC                   |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Pennsylvania, LLC           |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Mid-Continent LLC           |  | Delaware    
|Elk City Oklahoma Pipeline, L.P.           |  | Texas       
|Elk City Oklahoma GP, LLC                  |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Arkansas Pipeline LLC                |  | Oklahoma    
|Atlas Pipeline Finance Corp.               |  | Delaware    
|NOARK Pipeline System, Limited Partnership |  | Arkansas    
|Mid-Continent Arkansas Pipeline, LLC       |  | Arkansas    
|Ozark Gas Transmission, LLC                |  | Oklahoma    
|Ozark Gas Gathering, LLC                   |  | Oklahoma    
|NOARK Energy Services, LLC                 |  | Oklahoma    



113
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65516-65517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,971]


ASC Machine Tools, Inc., Spokane Valley, WA; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated September 21, 2010, a representative of the 
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM&AW), 
District Lodge 751, requested administrative reconsideration of the 
negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for 
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former 
workers of ASC Machine Tools, Inc., Spokane Valley, Washington (the 
subject firm). The Notice of negative determination was issued on 
August 11, 2010 and published in the Federal Register on August 30, 
2010 (75 FR 52986). The workers produce custom-order metal cutting 
machinery used to form and cut metal, including assembled equipment, 
component parts of equipment, and spare parts.
    The negative determination was based on the findings that the 
subject firm sales decline was due to loss of export sales of foreign 
customers' bids to competitors outside the United States. The initial 
investigation also revealed decreased aggregate imports of metal 
cutting equipment during the relevant period and that the subject firm 
is not a supplier or downstream producer for any firm that employed a 
worker group eligible to apply for TAA.
    The union official, in the request for reconsideration, alleges 
increased imports from Sen Fung Rollform Machinery Corporation in 
Taiwan and Metform International in Canada. The union official also 
articulates the concern that ``the affected workers are being penalized 
due to the inconsistent customer base of the company'' and requests 
that aggregate import data during 2007 and 2008 be considered.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department

[[Page 65517]]

of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26902 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
SET ASIDE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed January 14, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01424-CV

ORIENTAL BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Appellant

V.

RENE LEDUC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-05687-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Myers, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Before the Court is appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has 

informed the Court that the parties have settled their differences. In accordance with the parties’ 

agreement, we set aside the trial court’s judgment dated September 21, 2012 without regard to 

the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with 

their agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

121424F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ORIENTAL BUILDING SERVICES, INC., 

Appellant

No. 05-12-01424-CV V.

RENE LEDUC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-05687-M.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. 

Justices Myers and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we SET ASIDE the trial court’s 

judgment dated September 21, 2012 without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered this 14th day of January, 2014.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66797-66798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0012]


National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health 
(NACOSH), Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the NACOSH charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Labor has renewed the charter of the National 
Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) for two 
years.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Crawford, OSHA Directorate 
of Evaluation and Analysis, Room N-3641, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
1932.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    The Secretary of Labor (Secretary) has renewed the NACOSH charter. 
The charter will expire two years from today.
    NACOSH was established by Section 7(a) of the Occupational Safety 
and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651, 656) to advise, 
consult with,

[[Page 66798]]

and make recommendations to the Secretary and the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services on matters relating to the administration of the OSH 
Act. Under the OSH Act, Congress intended NACOSH to be a continuing 
advisory committee of indefinite duration.
    NACOSH operates in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and OSHA's regulations on NACOSH (29 CFR 
part 1912a). Pursuant to FACA and its implementing regulations (41 CFR 
102-3), the NACOSH charter must be renewed every two years. The charter 
expires two years from the date it is signed and filed.
    To read or download a copy of the new NACOSH charter, go to Docket 
No. OSHA-2010-0012 at http://www.regulations.gov, the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal. The charter also is available on the NACOSH page on 
OSHA's Web page at http://www.osha.gov and at the OSHA Docket Office, 
N-2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-2350. In addition, the 
charter may be viewed or downloaded at the Federal Advisory Committees 
Database at http://www.fido.gov.

Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for 
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice 
under the authority granted by Sections 6(b) and 7(a) of the 
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655, 656), the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), 29 CFR part 1912a, 41 
CFR 102-3, and Secretary of Labor's Order 4--2010 (75 FR 55355 (9/10/
2010)).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 26, 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-27439 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
wlthln the maw of the tern thert knowing the ‘Bcrm4 to huvo been 60 aoguired, shall 

ba punished in the mae mumor as if he had 

etolen $ha prapsrtyo* 

h&lole 1481 of tha ~Ponal 30% of Toxaae prOvld6sr 

Vhcft of property of the onluc of fifty. 

dollar8 or over still brr puninhad b aonfinesunt la+!10 genltantlary nQt loss t-al 5: two 

nor mom than ten yaar5." 

The offeneo of theft of property nnd reoeivinaj 

or oonoealing the aam property are entirely separate and 

dietinot offtanaoer Kaufnen V. state 70 Cr. R@ 4.38 I.59 

S. 74 58; C1ark.v. Stata, 0l Cr. !L 157, 194 .1* v* &37* 

Snidar ve Btato, 119 Cr. R, 635, 44 8. :'i. (26) 997. To 

oonetitute the offense of reoeivIng or oonoeal%ng stolen 

whom the property was stolen 

property, it 'is not nooeoaarg that the defendant know frcn 

Thn ~avamen of the offense 

le the re0ei~I.W and oonooal& of the pro erty knowing it 

to have been~Otolenr Pannoll v, Gtnto, L -1 Cr. iL 516, 51 

8, T4 (Ihi) 39& 

~e..asame frcnn your letter that Carver rooalwd 

all Of the m+~ul'y, whioh 18 valued in 5X0986 of $60.00, 

all the mine tlner The ag;FISagate value of t!-t;o stolen praperty reoslwd or ooni!ssZed detorminos the grade of the ofDrussall V* mite, a65 8, ':;. 164. The fact that 

~%&vxary *cuti stolen frors two scparote lsaaes and that 

t&a leasas were omed by two ao;?mate peroons, Boos not 

reduoe tha prade of the offsnaer Theft of property of tbo 

~rrlue of #50400 ox more is credo 8 felony, and reoeivim or 

~onooallng etolon property of tha vnI.u.uo of ,550.CO or store 

la 1lfCowlse made o felo!3$ . Artialea 14131 an& 1430 Of the 

PfnlRl code. 

]ta vle~ of Lho fore ?oFas, nuth@tlN, gOU arta 

roerpeatfully advlaad that is k 8 %..a 2, opinion cf thie departmont that If &arwr reoelved all of the mrdltr 

valued at #50,00 or mm, in the ~&m trmeaot P on* whioh kmmin& it3 

it to hma been stolen, ha should be proaaouted for a f@lOnF. 

rzqsting t&%the foroeoing satlsfnotC&Ly dlaposas 
l 

4 

D. !?ux e DQVif36 

im3intant
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 23, 2015

t1020 

# Order

Clerk October 23, 2015

150610

THOMAS TIBBLE, Bankruptcy Trustee for the

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF ROBERT

PRODINGER, D.O., and STEPHEN L.

LANGELAND, Bankruptcy Trustee for the

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF BATTLE

CREEK EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, P.C.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

DALE RUSSELL, P.C.,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 150610

COA: 306964

Calhoun CC: 2006

- 001805

- CZ

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

applicat ion for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.