alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1170

___________

Laxman S. Sundae, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Gale Norton, as the Secretary of the *

U.S. Department of Interior, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant-Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 8, 2004

Filed: July 29, 2004 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Laxman Sundae appeals pro se from the district court’s1

 entry of summary

judgment in favor of the Defendant in his employment discrimination action. In his

complaint, Sundae alleged that he applied for and was denied the position of mining

engineer within the Bureau of Land Management, a subdivision of the Department

of the Interior, on the basis of his race, color, national origin, age, and physical

handicap. He asserted causes of action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
-2-

1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,

29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.

The district court, acting upon the report and recommendation of a magistrate

judge, granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. It concluded that even

assuming Sundae made a prima facie case on each of his discrimination claims, the

Defendant proffered legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for his non-selection for

employment, and that Sundae failed to demonstrate that they were pretextual. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal authorities, we find no error in

the district court’s disposition of this matter. Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

       Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin
R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

/s/ Edwin R. Maus
-----------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, John C. Belden, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OCTuS, Inc.;



1.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



2.  Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.



3.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date:  May 13, 2004 | By: /s/ John C. Belden
John C. Belden
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
#### Arnold, Assignee, *v.*Sturges.

Tuesday, *January*7.

Debt by the assignee against the maker of a promissory note. Pleas, *nil debet,*and failure of consideration. *Held,*that the plaintiff could not recover, without producing, at the trial, an assignment to him of the note.

ERROR to the *Cass*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Debt by the assignee of a promissory note against the maker. Pleas, *nil debet,*failure of consideration, *257&c. Issues on the pleas, and verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

*H. Cooper,*for the plaintiff.

*A. S. White*and *R. A. Lochwoocl,*for the defendant.

It does not appear from the record, which contains all the evidence, that the plaintiff produced at the trial any assignment'of the note to him. It must therefore be considered, that, under the plea of *nil debet,*the plaintiff did not show any right to recover. The' circumstance, that no affidavit in denial of the assignment is attached to the plea, can make no difference. Whether such -an affidavit was necessary, under the statute, to oblige the. plaintiff to prove the execution of the assignment, is not the question. Supposing it was, still that is no reason- that the assignment should not be produced at the trial.

It is contended, that the admissions in the second plea excused the plaintiff from producing the .assignment. It must be recollected, however, that one plea cannot be used as evidence of any thing which another denies. *Wheeler*v. *Robb,*1 Blackf. *330.*—Harington v. *Macmorris, 5*Taunt. 228.

The motion for a new trial was correctly overruled.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 30, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the March
31, 1997 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,996
<SECURITIES>                                 3,217,621
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   512
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,273,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,981,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     65,809
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,273,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,004
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           1,707
<SECURITIES>                                     1,004
<RECEIVABLES>                                      200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,569
<PP&E>                                           8,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,279)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,100
<BONDS>                                          1,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,167)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,323
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (259)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,610)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES EVERETT LEE.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 4, 2013 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 18, 2013



/s/ R. Todd NodenR. Todd NodenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit (10)-w
                                BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED

                          EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                                    Amendment No. 1



     Pursuant to Section 12, the Plan is amended, effective
     January 1, 2000, as follows:

     1.   Section 7(d) is amended by deleting the first sentence
          thereof and substituting in its place the following:


          Earnings/losses on Investment Accounts hypothetically
          invested in mutual funds or other assets for which
          daily pricing is available ("Daily-Priced Investments")
          shall be valued daily in accordance with the relevant
          terms and conditions of the Daily-Priced Investments.
          Earnings/losses on Investment Accounts hypothetically
          invested in investments other than Daily-Priced
          Investments shall be credited effective on the last
          business day of each month.


     2.   Section 7(f) is amended by deleting the first clause
          thereof and substituting in its place the following:


          A participant may elect to reallocate amounts already
          in his/her Investment Accounts among the various
          Investment Accounts at such times and in accordance
          with such procedures as the Plan Administrator may in
          its sole discretion, prescribe;


     3.   Section 8(d) is amended by adding to the end thereof
          the following new paragraph:


          A Participant may make a change in the form of payment
          from the form previously elected to any other form
          permitted under the Plan at any time up to 24
          months prior to the date payments commence.  Any change
          elected within 24 months of a participant's payment
          commencement date shall be disregarded.



Dated ________________             BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED




                              By______________________________




                              Title_____________________________
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|    |                                                                                                                        |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10−Q/A of Craft Brew Alliance, Inc. (the “Registrant”); |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | May 10, 2019 |   |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /s/ Andrew J. Thomas |   |
|   | Andrew J. Thomas |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001 “
February 11, 2020
Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Maryland
Space Business Roundtable (MSBR) Lunch on February 18, 2020

On February 18, 2020, the Maryland Space Business Roundtable (MSBR), a nonprofit
organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a lunch at the Martin’s
Crosswinds in Greenbelt, MD, starting at 11:30 a.m. The guest speaker is Dr. Thomas
Zaurbuchen, Director, Science Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.

Approximately 350 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of
views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local
government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies,
academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all
food and beverages, is $34 per person. MSBR is in control of the organizing, planning and
invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange
information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements
of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including
NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under
Executive Order 13770, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests
of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those
circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the
individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their
duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the
interests of the MSBR, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or
administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local

ethics A-1—- may accept the invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone