alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters 

Washington, DC 20546-0001 

August 9, 2021 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group 

TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Distribution 

Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official 

Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at NG-16 

Commercial Resupply Service Mission Launch Events hosted by Northrop 

Grumman on or about August 10, 2021 

Northrop Grumman is scheduled to launch the NG-16 Commercial Resupply Service (CRS) 

Mission on an Antares launch vehicle from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility at Wallops 

Island, Virginia, currently scheduled for approximately August 10, 2021. The event 

includes snacks, dessert and beverages at the launch viewing site. 

Approximately 800 guests have been invited to attend. Invitees include members of the 

legislative branch, state and local government officials, industry representatives, academia, 

and personnel from other Federal agencies. The value of the event, which includes all food 

and refreshments, will be approximately $7 per person. I find that this event meets the 

requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F .R. § 263 5 .204(g)(2). 

I further determine that free attendance at the above mentioned event is in the interest of the 

agency because it will further agency programs and operations. Attendance at this event 

will allow NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. 

Accordingly, NASA employees (subject to the exceptions noted below) who have been 

invited to attend may accept free attendance for themselves and a guest to this event. 

However, NASA employees whose duties may substantially affect an event sponsor, such as 

by way of contracting duties, should seek an individual determination pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(3)(i), regarding participation in this event from their local ethics counselor. 

Moreover, NASA employees who are in non-career positions in which Executive Order 

13989 requires signing an ethics pledge may only accept the snacks, cake and wine toast if 

they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event and any gift items accepted for themselves 

and their guest. 

Attendees are reminded of the $20 gift exception at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(a), which provides 

that employees may accept gifts valued at no more than $20 per occasion (and no more than 

$50 from one source in a calendar year). We understand that Northrop Grumman will be 

distributing a mission patch ($2.55) and decal ($1.16), a lanyard ($3.07), the Northrop 
2 

Grumman bag ($2. 75), and a pair of Antares socks ($6.50), the total value of which is 

$16. 03. NASA employees in non-career positions who have signed the ethics pledge may 

accept the mission patch and decal; however, they may only accept the other items if they 

reimburse the sponsor ($12.32/or all other items). Attendees are reminded to exercise any 

COVID-19 precautions app spriate to their individual situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
- NASA Headquarters
- HQ Library   - Home
  - About HQ Library
  - Find Publications
  - Policy Resources
  - Patron Requests
  - Search Resources

# HQ Library Home

                                Learn More about HQ Library Home

## Our Mission

The NASA HQ Library supports the shared NASA mission of pioneering the future by:Enabling HQ staff to increase productivity by offering expert research services of professional librarians, desktop and remote access to electronic information, and a consolidated collection of Headquarters-focused information resources.

## Find Publications

      - Bibliographies
      - Books
      - Databases
      - Journals

## Bibliographies

      - Minorities in Science
      - Space Colonization
      - Space Debris
      - Astronaut Biographies
      - Space Commercialization
      - Space Law
      - Children’s Space Resources
      - Long-Term Challenges to Human Space Exploration
      - View All Bibliography Topics

## Dr. T. Keith Glennan

President Dwight D. Eisenhower selected Dr. T. Keith Glennan as NASA’s first Administrator in 1958.

In a 1958 introductory message to employees, Dr. Glennan outlined the expanded goals of the new agency.

## Explore 

### NASA Galaxie Search

Read More

### Subscribe to Alerts

Read More

### NASA Technical Reports Search

Read More

### IEEE Xplore Digital Library

Read More

### NASA Standards Search

Read More

### Visit the Library

Read More
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 28, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00666

- CR

Nicholas S. Morphis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE , JUSTICES GOODWIN A ND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court . Nicholas S.

Morphis has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows

Nicholas S. Morphis to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
# NASA and Lockheed Martin Officials in Front of Unveiled X-59

(from left to right) NASA Associate Administrator Jim Free, California Senior Economic Advisor to the Governor Dee Dee Myers, Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President of Aeronautics Greg Ulmer, NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy, Low Boom Flight Demonstrator Project Manager Cathy Bahm, Lockheed Martin X-59 Project Manager David Richardson, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works Vice President and General Manager John Clark, and NASA Associate Administrator for the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Bob Pearce pose in front of the agency’s X-59 quiet supersonic research aircraft at a January 12, 2024 event at Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California. The X-59 is the centerpiece of NASA’s Quesst mission, which seeks to solve one of the major barriers to supersonic flight over land, currently banned in the United States, by making sonic booms quieter.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-afrc2024-0004-070/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJanuary 12, 2024ProducerAFRCImage CreditNASA/Steve FreemanSize1920x1280pxPIA NumberAFRC2024-0004-070The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 24, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

884 

CA 13-00149 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

LOUISE KROLIKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLAN KROLIKOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

BENNETT, DIFILIPPO & KURTZHALTS, LLP, EAST AURORA (JOEL R. KURTZHALTS

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PALMER, MURPHY & TRIPI, BUFFALO (THOMAS A. PALMER OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice

M. Rosa, J.), entered April 17, 2012 in a divorce action. The

judgment, among other things, directed plaintiff to pay maintenance to

defendant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by increasing the duration of

maintenance from five years to nine years and as modified the judgment

is affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Defendant husband appeals from a judgment that,

among other things, ordered plaintiff wife to pay defendant

maintenance of $200 per week for five years, ordered plaintiff to pay

defendant $40,800.75 for his interest in the marital residence, and

distributed other marital assets. We reject defendant’s contention

that Supreme Court abused its discretion in awarding him only $200 per

week in maintenance, and that the award of maintenance should be

substantially increased (see Mayle v Mayle, 299 AD2d 869, 869). 

“[T]he amount and duration of maintenance are matters committed to the

sound discretion of the trial court” (Reed v Reed, 55 AD3d 1249, 1251

[internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, the record establishes

that the court properly considered defendant’s “reasonable needs and

predivorce standard of living in the context of the other enumerated

statutory factors” in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a) (Hartog

v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36, 52; see Frost v Frost, 49 AD3d 1150, 1151). We

conclude, however, that the court abused its discretion with respect

to the duration of maintenance, and we therefore modify the judgment

by increasing the duration of maintenance from five years to nine

years (see generally Reed, 55 AD3d at 1251).

Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court properly

exercised its broad discretion in making an equitable distribution of
-2- 884 

CA 13-00149 

the marital property (see Martinson v Martinson, 32 AD3d 1276, 1277;

Bossard v Bossard, 199 AD2d 971, 971), upon considering the requisite

statutory factors (see generally Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5]

[d]). In particular, the court properly considered the fact that

plaintiff used separate property received from the estates of her

father and uncle to pay off indebtedness on the marital residence (see

Midy v Midy, 45 AD3d 543, 544-545). We conclude that defendant’s

remaining contentions, concerning the equitable distribution of the

value of an investment account, plaintiff’s summer paychecks, and the

parties’ vehicles, are without merit.

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS,LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, PayingAgent and Custodian, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS5 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00402

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R .L., A

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 322ND DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 322

- 427609

- 07

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND J UDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant 's “Motion for Dismissal .” It is the court ’ s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appe llant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GAB RIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

DELIVERED: March 26, 2015

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.C.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2014-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2016 through   December 31, 2016, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 164 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 164

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2003

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
   resource study of sites associated with the life of Cesar Estrada 
                  Chavez and the farm labor movement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cesar Estrada Chavez Study Act''.

SEC. 2. RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 3 years after funds are made 
available to implement this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
(referred to in this section as the ``Secretary'') shall complete a 
resource study of sites in the State of Arizona, the State of 
California, and other States that are significant to the life of Cesar 
E. Chavez and the farm labor movement in the western United States to 
determine appropriate methods for preserving and interpreting the 
sites; and to determine whether any of the sites meets the criteria for 
listing in the National Register of Historic Places or designation as a 
national historic landmark under the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 
461 et seq.); and the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
et seq.).
    (b) Requirements.--In conducting the study the Secretary shall 
consider the criteria for the study of areas of potential inclusion in 
the National Park System under section 8(b)(2) of Public Law 91-383 (16 
U.S.C. 1a-5(b)(2)).
    (c) Consultation.--In conducting the study the Secretary shall 
consult with--
            (1) the Cesar E. Chavez Foundation;
            (2) the United Farm Workers Union; and
            (3) State and local historical associations and societies, 
        including State Historic Preservation Offices in the State 
        where a site is located.
    (d) Report.--On completion of the study the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report on the 
findings of the study and any recommendations.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the Senate April 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRAFEM,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,274,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,577,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                    82,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,945,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,159,648
<PP&E>                                      12,861,695
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,158,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,263,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,993,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,347,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,263,974
<SALES>                                      1,786,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,786,679
<CGS>                                        1,168,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,821,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (216,871)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,821,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,821,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,821,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Roger Bruce Chaffee**

***Personal***: Born February 15, 1935, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Died January 27, 1967 in the Apollo 204 fire at Cape Kennedy. Was married, two children.

***Education***: B.S. in aeronautical engineering, Purdue University, 1957.

***Spaceflights***: None.

 Was chosen in the third group of astronauts in 1963. Had been selected as lunar module pilot for the first Apollo flight.

****
**Virgil Grissom | Edward White**

----

|  |  |
|--|--|

**
Updated August 4, 2006     Steve Garber, NASA History Web Curator     For further information E-mail histinfo@hq.nasa.gov
**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 9, 2001 on the consolidated
balance sheets of PentaStar Communications, Inc. (the "Company") as of December
31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000 and for the period from
inception (March 15, 1999) through December 31, 1999 included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-48652)
and to all references to our Firm included in this Registration Statement.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
 April 2, 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# DATES:

November 17-18, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is: Rockville—Hilton Hotel (Roosevelt Room), 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20850.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Grace Tollini-Farrell, 301-496-7551.

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Daniel Rotrosen,

Director, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, NIAID, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-27317 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0608

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 11, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 5 2021

05/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0608