alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****
**Journal Home Page**

# Acknowledgements

Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.

We would also like to thank the following people who contributed much to the Journal. Dave Scott, Commander of Apollo 15, kindly reviewed the Journal and graciously put up with the incessant queries we put to him. In February 2004, he travelled to Scotland to join Frank O'Brien, historian David Harland and myself for a review of the flight. Al Worden, the Command Module Pilot of Apollo 15, also took time out of a busy schedule to give assistance when requested. Steve Garber of the NASA History Office and Lois Morris of Rice University, Texas provided many of the background documents with which the story of the flight could be retraced. Henry Spencer also reviewed the text, lending his immense knowledge to tightening up many of the deeper technical aspects and Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute reviewed those sections dealing with the geology of Luna. The guidance of David M. Harland in the early stages of preparation, and his careful, experienced eye in catching sequencing and logical errors is also very much appreciated. We would also like to thank NASA for hosting this site on their servers and therefore giving it a presence on the web that would be otherwise more difficult to achieve.

Michael Light kindly donated imagery from his wonderful book, *Full Moon.* Rob Gendler donated superb images of the Moon which he expertly took himself. Kipp Teague supplied high resolution images from his Project Apollo Image Gallery . Bruce Yarbro of Papertrainer furnished me with copies of recent photodocumentation he had done of the Apollo 13 Command Module *Odyssey*. Robin Wheeler scanned and donated dozens of images from the science cameras and Joe O'Dea compiled an index to the photographic images used in the journal. Ken Glover produced RealVideo clips and Lennie Waugh nursed a hot scanner to provide scans of the Apollo 15 Flight Plan.

Finally, to those kind folk who either read the transcript looking for errors, omissions, inconsistencies and typos; or else provided answers to queries when called upon, we extend our grateful thanks. Ry Alford, Robert Barron, Doug Bennett, Tim Blaxland, Syd Buxton, Marc Cecotti, Chuck Corway, David Craig, Richard Croy, Steve Cybulski, Gordon Davie, Eduardo Delgado, Dave Edwards, Pete Evans, Andrew Field, Kevin Forsyth, William Foster, George Giusti, Richard Glueck, Henk Hakkesteegt, Ronald Hansen, Derek Henderson, Mick Hyde, Mike Jetzer, Phil Karn, Bill Kromydas, Harald Kucharek, Brian Lawrence, Don Lind, Calum Mackay, Gary Matylewicz, Simon Meredith, Graham Nelson, Ken Offer, Richard Orloff, Martin Peters, Jim Scotti, Jim Sherman, Shawn Shianna, Shaun Smith, Roland S. Speth, Kevin Stirling, James Summers, John Tribe, Alexandr S. Turhanov, Henri M. van Bemmel, Andrew Vignaux, Justin Wigg, Kevin Woods.

David Woods

##### © 1998 - 2009 by W. David Woods and Frank O'Brien. All rights reserved.
No. 113.

#### Elizabeth Formby, guardian, &c. plaintiff in error, *vs.*William Wood, guardian, defendant.

[1.] An appeal may be entered by a lunatic in a period of sanity.

Motion, in Floyd Superior Court. Decided by Judge Trippe, December Term, 1855.

This was a bill in Equity, filed by Elizabeth Formby, as . guardian of Jackson Formby, against John M. Hunt.

At February Term, 1852, upon petition of the defendant, representing himself as a lunatic, William Wood was appointed his guardian *ad litem.*

At August Term, 1853, the Jury rendered a decree in •favor of complainant, from which an appeal was entered by ..Hunt himself, by affidavit sworn to by himself.

At December Term, 1855, a motion was made to dismiss said appeal, on the ground that a guardian *ad*litem, having been regularly appointed to defend for defendant as a lunatic, no appeal could be entered except by said guardian.

The motion to dismiss was over-ruled by the Court, and complainant excepted to that decision.

Alexander; Wright & Shropshire, for plaintiff in -error.

,Underwood, for defendant.

*582*By the Court.*

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] If the appeal affidavit made by Hunt, was made duing a lucid interval, the act was valid.

“ All acts done during a *lucid interval,*are to be considered as those of a person perfectly capable of contracting, managing and disposing of his affairs at that period; and this rule applies to *wills*as well as contracts.” *(Shelford Lu*natics, 289; *Hall vs. Warren,*9 *Ves.*610.)

The office of the guardian *ad litem,*in the case of the lunatic, as in that of the infant, expires with the cause of it.

This being so, the question is, was the affidavit of Hunt made during a period of sanity ? .

And we think that the *prima facie*presumption to be made is, that it was.

“The reason why feoffments of infants and'persons *non compos mentis*are voidable only, proceeds from the solemnity of livery of seizin which was anciently contracted *coram paribus curtís,*who signed their attestation to the same, which the law presumed they would not have done had the incapacity of the party been apparent.” *(Shelford*Lunatics, 255.)

Hunt’s affidavit was made before a Judge of the Inferior Court, and it was received by the Clerk of the Superior Court. Is it to be presumed that this Judge would have administered the oath, or that this Clerk would have received it, if the man making it were insane ? We think not.

Besides, some inference in favor of sanity may be drawn from the nature of the very act imputed as the act of an insane man — the affidavit. It requires, I think, a good deal of sense to go to the making of that affidavit. It does not appear that Hunt had any Counsel in the Act. *(Shelford Lunatics,*290.)

We affirm the judgment of the Court below.
# Brig. Gen. Geoff Van Epps

####         Member    

Brigadier General Geoff Van Epps assumed duties as the commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division, on July 22, 2021.

As division commander, he is responsible for providing guidance and direction to five operating district commands located in Portland, Oregon; Seattle and Walla Walla, Washington; Kansas City, Missouri; and Omaha, Nebraska, with a combined professional workforce of nearly 5,400. Key missions include managing the nation’s water resources infrastructure for economic growth and environmental sustainability, timely response to natural disasters, support to military installations and civilian communities throughout the region and strengthening national security.

Brig. Gen. Van Epps was commissioned in 1995 as an engineer officer from the U.S. Military Academy, where he received a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. He also holds a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri at Rolla (now the Missouri University of Science and Technology), a master’s degree in Economics, Finance and Management from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra and a master’s degree in International Relations from the lnstitut Barcelona d’Estudis lnternacionals, the latter two degrees earned while studying as an Olmsted Scholar in Barcelona, Spain. He is a registered Professional Engineer in North Carolina.

Prior to his arrival at Northwestern Division, Brig. Gen. Van Epps served as the director of the Office of the Chief of Engineers on the Army Staff. His command assignments include commander, 130th Engineer Brigade, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii; commander, 10th Engineer Battalion and 1st Brigade Special Troops Battalion, both as part of the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, Georgia; and commander, Company B, 249th Engineer Battalion (Prime Power) at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Brig. Gen. Van Epps’ other key assignments include chief engineer for the NATO Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan; chief of staff, US Army Engineer School, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri; Army fellow at the George C. Marshall Center for European Security Studies in Germany; assignment officer at Army Human Resources Command; and battalion executive officer in the 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, Texas.

His awards and decorations include the Legion of Merit, the Bronze Star Medal, and the Defense Meritorious Service Medal.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Maritime Ventures, Inc.

(the  "Company)  on Form 10-KSB for the year  ended June 30,  2005, Jehu

Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of

his knowledge:



(1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of

Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly

presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition

and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jehu Hand



Jehu Hand

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(principal executive and financial officer

June 13, 2006











<PAGE>
|                                                         |   |   |   | Three      Months ended March 31, |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   | 2009 |   | 2008 |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
| Computation      of loss per common share:                   |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |
|         Net loss applicable to common  shares |   |   |   |                              |   | $(833,114) |   | $(747,579) |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|         Weighted average number of common shares   |   |   |   |                              |   | 107,395,216  |   | 107,173,549  |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|         Net income (loss) per common share         |   |   |   |                              |   | $(0.01) |   | $(0.01) |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
| Computation      of income ( loss ) per common               |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|         share assuming full dilution**             |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |   |   |                              |   |   |   |   |
#### Ronald Gary MAESTAS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Miles LONG, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 02-17083.

D.C. No. CV-98-00371-KJD/LRL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 15, 2003.*

Decided July 25, 2003.

Before REINHARDT, SILER,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

AEDPA’s period of limitation is statutorily tolled during the pendency of an “application for State post-conviction or other collateral review.” *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2); *Tillema v. Long,*253 F.3d 494, 498-99 (9th Cir.2001). Maestas’s motion to produce discovery did not challenge his sentence or conviction but was only a preliminary step toward filing a petition for post-conviction or other collateral review. Thus, statutory tolling is inapplicable. Maestas’s discovery motion also did not equitably toll the statute. Maestas has not made any showing that any of the documents he sought in his motion to produce discovery could have been relevant to any filing he might have made for either *715state or federal collateral relief. In the absence of tolling during the time the discovery motion was pending, Maestas’s habeas petition is barred by the AEDPA one-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Crossroads Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos.
333-106924, 333-62336, 333-37584, 333-92467) on Form S-8 of Crossroads Systems,
Inc. of our report dated November 25, 2003, except as to note 15, which is as of
December 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Crossroads
Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of October 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the October 31, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K of Crossroads Systems, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Austin, Texas
January 21, 2004
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1662
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sandra B. Cochran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Books-A-Million,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the periods presented in this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2005

                                           /s/ Sandra B. Cochran
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sandra B. Cochran
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
# U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifies additional short-term natural disaster recovery activities

**Washington (May 21, 2018) -**The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) announced today additional work that it will accomplish with funding provided in Public Law 115-123, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, signed into law February 9, 2018.

Among other things, Public Law 115-123 provided USACE a total of $17.398 billion in six appropriations accounts: Investigations; Construction; Mississippi River and Tributaries; Operation and Maintenance; Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies; and Expenses.

Of that amount, USACE will use approximately $424 million of the $810 million provided in the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account to repair damage to 48 locally owned flood risk management projects in 11 states and one territory.

“The projects announced today and allocation of funds will enable the Corps to continue the repair work it has started to alleviate the impacts of past disasters on projects that are important to human safety and flood-prone property,” said Mr. R.D. James, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works.  

This is the second set of short-term repair work that USACE has announced with the funds provided in Public Law 115-123.  USACE announced the first set of short-term repair work on April 30, with an initial allocation of approximately $360 million of the $608 million provided in the Operation and Maintenance account to repair damages to USACE projects resulting from natural disasters and to perform emergency dredging of shoaled material deposited at USACE navigation projects by natural disasters.  Those funds will be used to address the priority O&M needs identified by USACE with that announcement, at 31 projects in 11 states. 

The current list of projects that will be funded to mitigate damages resulting from natural disasters is posted at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Budget/ as “Short-Term Repairs” under "Supplemental Appropriations for Disasters 2018."  The list will be updated as additional information becomes available.

USACE will announce additional allocations of funds under PL 115-123 at a later date.

  

-30-

**Contact**

Release no. 18-033
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**Section
      1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer**




In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
        F. Bijou, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
        and
  2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results
        of
        operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
        the
        report.




Date:      
                July 27, 2007
            /s/ Thomas F. Bijou
              Thomas
                F. Bijou
              Chief
                Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**THIRD AMENDMENT TO**

**PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY**

**2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, Plains Exploration & ProductionCompany (the “Company”) maintains the Plains Exploration & Production Company 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain eligible persons as set forth in the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS,** all words with initial capital letters shall have the same meaning herein as ascribed thereto in the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS,**the Company desires to amend the Plan, effective as set forth below, and 

**WHEREAS**, in Section 17 of the Plan, the Board reserved the right to amend or modify the Plan and any Agreement issued thereundersubject to the limitations set forth therein; and 

**WHEREAS,**the Board has authorized appropriate officers of the Company toamend the Plan and Agreements to effect the changes generally described above and as specifically set forth in the amendment below. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**effective as of February 21, 2007, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 21.4of the Plan is hereby renumbered as Section 21.5 and a new Section 21.4 is added as follows: 

21.4Section 409A Compliance. To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Plan and any Awards granted hereunder comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and any related regulations or other guidance promulgatedwith respect to that section by the U.S. Department of the Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service. Any provision that would cause the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan to fail to satisfy Section 409A of the Code will have no force oreffect until amended to comply with Section 409A of the Code, which amendment may be retroactive to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of a Matter To Be Added to the Agenda for 
Consideration at an Agency Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2010.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

    4a. Briefing--NCUSIF Public Education Campaign.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26713 Filed 10-19-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P