alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|
|  | **Bibliography**
**BOOKS**

 Atkinson, Joseph D., and Jay M. Shafritz, *The Real Stuff.*New         York: Praeger Publishers, 1985.       

 Berry, C.A., *Problems of Astronaut Selection.* New York: American         Rocket Society, 1962.       

 Carpenter, Scott, Gordon Cooper, John Glenn, Virgil Grissom, Walter         Schirra, Alan Shepard, and Donald Slayton, *We Seven.* New York:         Simon & Schuster, 1962.       

 Cole, Michael D., *Friendship 7: First American in Orbit (Countdown         to Space).*New York: Enslow Publishers, Inc., 1995. Reading level:         Ages 9–12       

 Kallen, Stuart A., *The Mercury Seven (Giant Leaps).*New York:         Abdo & Daughters, 1996. Reading level: Ages 9–12       

*Mercury Project Summary—Results of the Fourth Manned Orbital         Flight* (NASA Technical Report). Washington, DC: NASA, 1963. SP-45       

 Pitts, John A., *The Human Factor: Biomedicine in the Manned Space         Program to 1980.* Washington, DC: NASA, 1985. SP-4213       

 Sipiera, Paul P., and Sipiera, Diane M., *Project Mercury.* New         York: Children's Press, 1998.       

 Slayton, Donald K., and Michael Cassutt (Contributor), *Deke!—U.S.         Manned Space: From Mercury to the Shuttle.* New York: Reprint, 1995.       

 Swenson, Loyd S. Jr., James M. Grimwood, and Charles C. Alexander, *This         New Ocean: A History of Project Mercury.* Washington, DC: NASA, 1966.         SP-4201       

 Wilson, A., *The Eagle Has Wings: The Story of American Space Exploration         1945–1975.*London: British Interplanetary Society, 1982.       

 Wilson, Charles L., *Project Mercury Candidate Evaluation Program*         (WADC Technical Report 59-505). Dayton, OH: Wright Air Development Center,         1959.       

 Wolfe, Tom, *The Right Stuff* (fictional account). New York: Bantam         Books, 1983. Fictional Account      

**ARTICLES**

 Carpenter, Scott, Gordon Cooper, John Glenn, Virgil Grissom, Walter         Schirra, Alan Shepard, and Donald Slayton, "First Person Reports by the         Astronauts." *Life* (September 1959): 626–43.       

 Fisher, Alan C., "Exploring Tomorrow with the Space Agency." *National         Geographic Magazine* (July 1960): 50–81.       

 Lovelace, W.R., "Duckings, Probings, Checks that Proved Fliers' Fitness."         *Life* 46(16) (April 1959): 22–29.       

 Weaver, Kenneth, "Countdown for Space." *National Geographic Magazine*         (May 1961): 702–734.       

Top |

###   

###
# What Is Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome?

Seventy percent of astronauts on the International Space Station experience some amount of swelling in the back of the eye. What causes this swelling?

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/what-spaceflight-associated-neuro-ocular-syndrome/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x1388pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 16, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-299-CV

IN RE MCCURDY & MCCURDY, LLP	RELATOR

	----------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Settlement.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  MCCOY, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.  

DELIVERED:  October 23, 2006
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P.



|                                           |  |             
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|Name                                       |  | Jurisdiction
|Atlas Pipeline Operating Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Pipeline New York, LLC               |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Ohio, LLC                   |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Pennsylvania, LLC           |  | Pennsylvania
|Atlas Pipeline Mid-Continent LLC           |  | Delaware    
|Elk City Oklahoma Pipeline, L.P.           |  | Texas       
|Elk City Oklahoma GP, LLC                  |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Arkansas Pipeline LLC                |  | Oklahoma    
|Atlas Pipeline Finance Corp.               |  | Delaware    
|NOARK Pipeline System, Limited Partnership |  | Arkansas    
|Mid-Continent Arkansas Pipeline, LLC       |  | Arkansas    
|Ozark Gas Transmission, LLC                |  | Oklahoma    
|Ozark Gas Gathering, LLC                   |  | Oklahoma    
|NOARK Energy Services, LLC                 |  | Oklahoma    
|Atlas Pipeline Mid-Continent WestOk, LLC   |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Pipeline Mid-Continent WestTex, LLC  |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Chaney Dell, LLC                     |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Midkiff, LLC                         |  | Delaware    
|Atlas Pipeline McKean, LLC                 |  | Pennsylvania
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               499,766
<SECURITIES>                                         2,917,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       30,268,307<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           30,003,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         30,268,307<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     122,160<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     268,842<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,814,984)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (35.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Included in Total Assets is Investments in Local Limited  Partnerships of $26,556,574,  Restricted cash of $259,499
and Other assets of $35,268.
<F2>Included  in Total  Liabilities and Equity is Accounts  payable to affiliates of $227,872 and Accounts  payable and
accrued expenses of $37,024.
<F3>Total revenue includes Investment of $101,167 and Other of $20,993.
<F4>Included  in Other  Expenses is Asset  management  fees of  $145,506,  General and  administrative  of $107,245 and
Amortization of $16,091.
<F5>Net loss reflects Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships of $1,668,302.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
- Home
- Goddard Visitor Center
- Goddard Exhibits for Loan

- Home
- Events and Programs
- Permanent Exhibits
- Field Trips and Tours   - Field Trips & Tours
  - Virtual Field Trips
- Visit Us   - Driving Directions
  - Exhibits for Loan

# 							Goddard Exhibits for Loan						

Looking for a display or exhibit to help engage your guests or students in NASA, STEM, or space-themed topics? NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center has an outreach program that loans out traveling exhibits such as astronaut photo cut-outs, a space suit and blue flight suit, and more – on a short-term basis – normally anywhere from one to three weeks. Displays and exhibits are made available to school and community groups and other educational organizations – as well as to Goddard employees – on a first-come, first-served basis within Goddard’s geographical operating area.

For more information on the program and to see what is available, please contact GSFC-VisitorCenter@mail.nasa.gov.

## Exhibit Options

### Astronaut Cutouts

Choose up to 3, each a different height.

See Larger Image

### Astronaut Image Stands (various)

Pick from three different options.

See Larger Image

### NASA Photo Booth Kiosk

Loaded with three backgrounds featuring Artemis images. Please allow 8 weeks advance for reservation.

See Larger Image

### Step Repeat Banner + Case (Goddard Employees Only)

The banner is 82” tall x 58” wide with a base that is 9” deep. The case is 9” wide x 4” deep x 62” tall.  It weighs approx. 15 lbs. 5 are available.

See Larger Image

### NASA Inflatable (Goddard Employees Only)

Very large (10'x6' plus tethers) and requires 2+ people to set up and take down. Blower included.

See Larger Image

### Spacesuit, Flight Suits, and Graphics (Goddard Employees Only

Suits are delicate and MUST NOT be worn.

See Larger Image

## 

## Goddard Exhibit Request Form

Complete this form to request one or more exhibits for your group.

## NASA Requests for Exhibits, Artifacts, or Speakers

NASA has exhibits, artifacts and a pool of speakers available to learning institutions and organizations across the country. Learn more about each program using the information at this link.

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Goddard Visitor Center

About Goddard

Goddard Events & Programs

Goddard Media Resources and Guidelines
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD L. JOHNSON, SR.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-3335

(D.C. No. 2:03-CR-20013-JWL-2)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-3335 Document: 01018415107 Date Filed: 05/04/2010 Page: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1725

  To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the 
 Interior to issue separately, for the same area, a lease for tar sand 
          and a lease for oil and gas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the 
 Interior to issue separately, for the same area, a lease for tar sand 
          and a lease for oil and gas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMBINED HYDROCARBON LEASING.

    (a) Special Provisions Regarding Leasing.--Section 17(b)(2) of the 
Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) The Secretary may issue under this Act for 
                the same area, separately--
                            ``(i) a lease for explanation for and 
                        extraction of tar sand; and
                            ``(ii) a lease for exploration for and 
                        development of oil and gas.
                    ``(C) A lease issued under subparagraph (B)(ii) 
                shall not be further subject to the Combined 
                Hydrocarbon Leasing Act of 1981 (30 U.S.C. 181 et 
                seq.).
                    ``(D) A lease issued for tar sand shall be issued 
                using the same bidding process, annual rental, and 
                posting period as a lease issued for oil and gas, 
                except that the minimum acceptable bid required for a 
                lease issued for tar sand shall be $2 per acre.
                    ``(E) The Secretary may waive, suspend, or alter 
                any requirement under section 26 that a permittee under 
                a permit authorizing prospecting for tar sand must 
                exercise due diligence, to promote any resource covered 
                by a combined hydrocarbon lease.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 17(b)(1)(B) of the Mineral 
Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226(b)(1)(B)) is amended in the second sentence 
by inserting ``, subject to paragraph (2)(B),'' after ``the 
Secretary''.
    (c) Regulations.--Within 45 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue final regulations 
to implement this section.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 15
- 00481
- CV

L. D. N., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 14
- 000279 THE HONORABLE STEPHE N YELE NOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant L.D. N. filed his notice of appeal on July 20, 2015 . The appellate record was complete August 4, 2015 , making appellant = s brief due August 24, 2015

. To date, appellant = s brief has not been filed

.

Am endments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days f

or court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requir es greater compliance with br iefing deadlines. Therefore we order counsel to file appellant = s brief no later
than September 18, 2015 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on September 8, 2015

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
1 min read

# System-Wide Safety Hosts Panel at Crosscutting Meeting

### Lillian Gipson

#### Web Editor

Feb 07, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA System-Wide Safety (SWS) project members recently participated with industry leaders in a panel session discussing the concept of an In-Time Aviation Safety Management System. The December 2022 event drew more than 100 people via an online forum or by watching on YouTube.

As part of the Advanced Air Mobility Ecosystem Working Groups’ Crosscutting Working Group, the session provided insight into key topics of interest within the aviation industry and opinions on near-term wins and long-term visions coming together to transform the global airspace.

The gathering included a brief overview by Dr. Lance Prinzel, SWS senior technical advisor. Michael Vincent, SWS associate project manager, moderated the discussion. Panelists included Dr. Kyle Ellis, SWS deputy project manager; Jim Ackerson from the NASA Aeronautics Research Institute; Dr. Deborah Kirkman from the Flight Safety Foundation; and Dr. Paul Krois from Crown Consulting.

Engagements like this help NASA shape its research to best address industry needs while answering key questions from government regulators.

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

3 min readSystem-Wide Safety CollaborationsArticle										4 weeks ago									

1 min readNASA Langley Participates in Drone Responders ConferenceArticle										3 months ago									

4 min readAdvice from NASA Mentors to Students Starting Their CareersArticle										5 months ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space
Solar System Exploration
Why Oceans Matter The story of oceans is the story of life. Life as we know it requires three ingredients:…

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - System-Wide Safety
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRYAN GORDON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D12-3128

[May 18, 2016]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 2005CF000797A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. 

Comras, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Gordon appeals the denial of a rule 3.850 motion following an 

evidentiary hearing. Gordon’s motion raised five claims. The trial court 

granted an evidentiary hearing on claims 1 through 4. Following the 

hearing, the court granted relief on claim 2, ordering resentencing. The 

court denied claims 1, 3, and 4 and “all other requested relief.” Although 

the court did not expressly discuss claim 5, we conclude that it was 

summarily denied, and because the claim was insufficient, we affirm.

 

In claim 5, appellant alleged his attorneys were ineffective for filing a 

motion to mitigate his sentence rather than a rule 3.170(l) motion to 

withdraw his plea. Appellant alleged that he was prejudiced by counsel 

filing the wrong motion because the issue was not preserved for appeal. 

Counsel’s failure to preserve an issue for appeal does not show the 

prejudice necessary to establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim 

under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Strobridge v. State, 

1 So. 3d 1240, 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Strickland prejudice focuses on 

the proceeding being challenged, here the plea proceedings in the trial 
- 2 -

court. See Strobridge, 1 So. 3d at 1242 (discussing Carratelli v. State, 961 

So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007)). Appellant did not demonstrate through his other 

claims or any additional allegations that withdrawal of his plea was 

necessary to correct a manifest injustice and that there was a reasonable 

probability a rule 3.170(l) motion would have been granted. 

We affirm the summary denial of claim 5 and affirm without comment 

the denial of the other claims. 

Affirmed.

GROSS, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                                          December 30, 1999

Dear Bob:

We are pleased to offer you an opportunity to join 800.COM, as soon as possible.
The details of this offer are listed below. This offer supercedes any prior
offers.

Company:            800.COM is an online Internet retailer of consumer
                    electronics.

Position:           Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Compensation:       $250,000 per year is your target compensation based on a
                    100% performance level, with a potential to over-perform.
                    This includes a base salary and bonus opportunity as
                    follows:

Base Salary:        $200,000 per year.

Bonus Opportunity:  $50,000 annual opportunity at a 100%
                    performance level, with the potential to over-perform.
                    Criteria to be determined and agreed upon within a 30-day
                    period. Incentive to be paid quarterly, beginning April
                    2000.

Stock Options:      Pending approval by the board of directors, you
                    will be granted an option to purchase 300,000 shares of
                    common stock of 800.COM, which will vest 100% over a 4-year
                    period. As a key executive in the company, your options will
                    be eligible for accelerated vesting due to a change of
                    control as outlined in the final stock option plan.

Start Date:         January 5, 2000, or as soon as possible.

Termination:        If you are terminated without cause, you will receive 180
                    days severance pay at your base rate of pay.

Benefits:           800.COM insurance programs and other benefits as outlined in
                    the 800.COM employee handbook.

<PAGE>   2

Bob, the executive staff and I are very excited about the opportunity for you to
join us and take 800.COM to its next level of performance. We look forward to a
great journey together.

This offer is subject to written and signed approval by both parties, and
expires on January 4, 2000, 5pm. Although we plan our association with you will
be long lasting, 800.COM is an "at will" employer and nothing in this offer
letter may be construed as a contract of employment. Just as you will be free to
terminate your employment with 800.COM for any reason, 800.COM reserves the
right to terminate employment with or without cause. Please acknowledge your
acceptance of this offer by signing where indicated below.

Best regards,                         Accepted by:

/s/ Greg Drew  Date:  12-30-99        /s/ Bob Falcone       Date:  1-5-00
---------------------------------     -----------------------------------
Greg Drew, CEO                        Bob Falcone
800.COM, Inc.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 30, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

R. WAYNE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

DORIS L. GRUNTMEIR; UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL;

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-7098

(D.C. No. 6:09-CV-00256-RAW)

ORDER

On April 7, 2010 this court ordered Mr. Johnson to make full payment of the

appellate filing fees to the district court within 21 days. As of the date of this order, the

filing fee has not been paid. The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution

pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-7098 Document: 01018412813 Date Filed: 04/30/2010 Page: 1