alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.36****COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS*****Cash Compensation***The Board of Directors approved a 10% reduction in cash compensation to outside directors,effective January 1, 2008. Effective as of that date, the cash fees paid to outside directors are asset forth below.     **Chairman of the Board**The Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. R.S. Evans, receives a cash retainer fee of $90,000per year. Mr. Evans receives no other cash compensation for his service on the Board and itsCommittees.     **Other Non-Employee Directors**Non-employee directors, other than Mr. Evans, receive the following cash compensation:**•** $22,500 annual Board retainer **•** $9,000 annual retainer for chairman of the Audit Committee **•** $1,350 annual retainer for other Audit Committee members **•** $2,700 annual retainer for chairman of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee **•** $1,800 annual retainer for Executive Committee members **•** $1,800 for each Board meeting and Committee meeting attended***Stock Compensation***Non-employee directors are awarded, on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, an annualgrant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for shares of Company common stock having a value ofapproximately $15,000 on the date of grant. The RSUs vest in full on the date of the next AnnualMeeting of Stockholders or upon a change in control of the Company. The shares of stock representedby vested RSUs are delivered to the director upon cessation of his service on the Board. Allunvested RSUs are forfeited upon cessation of a director’s service on the Board for any reason.Each non-employee director received a grant of 2,205 RSUs on April 23, 2007, with a value ofapproximately $15,000, based on the fair market value of Company common stock on that date. TheseRSUs vest on April 21, 2008, the date of the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.The Company reimburses its directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board andCommittee meetings.
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Division**

----

****

----

**The Apollo 11 Flight JournalDavid Woods, Ken MacTaggart and Frank O'Brien**

----

*Apollo 11 Flight Journal*
Apollo Flight Journal

Like its companion, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, it is intended to be a resource for all those interested in the Apollo program, whether in a passing or scholarly capacity.

This journal covers the flight of Apollo 11 from launch to splashdown. As a living document, it will continue to grow and evolve. Journals for other Apollo flights are available at the AFJ Portal.

----

##### Travelling from the Earth to the Moon

- Day 1, part 1: Launch
- Day 1, part 2: Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection
- Day 1, part 3: Transposition, Docking and Extraction
- Day 1, part 4: Navigation and Housekeeping
- Day 2, part 1: Midcourse Correction
- Day 2, part 2: TV Transmission
- Day 2, part 3: Laser Experiment
- Day 3, part 1: Viewing Africa and Breakfast
- Day 3, part 2: Entering Eagle
- Day 3, part 3: Flight Plan Updates
- Day 4, part 1: Approaching the Moon

##### Lunar Orbit

- Day 4, part 2: Entering Lunar Orbit
- Day 4, part 3: TV from Orbit
- Day 4, part 4: Lunar Orbit Circularisation
- Day 4, part 5: Checking Out Eagle
- Day 5, part 1: Preparations for Landing
- Day 5, part 2: Undocking and the Descent Orbit
- Apollo 11 Lunar Surface Journal
- Day 6, part 2: Rendezvous and Docking
- Day 6, part 3: Boarding Columbia and LM Jettison
- Day 6, part 4: Trans-Earth Injection

##### Homeward Journey to Earth

- Day 7, part 1: Leaving the Lunar Sphere of Influence
- Day 7, part 2: Television and Food Demonstrations
- Day 8, part 1: The News and Spacecraft Checks
- Day 8, part 2: More Television and Stowage for Re-entry
- Day 9, part 1: Approaching Earth
- Day 9, part 2: Entry and Splashdown

----

- Apollo 11 Documents  (with thanks to Bob Andrepont)
- Photography Index
- Video Index

----

##### Essay

- Weathering the Recovery of Apollo 11  - Sean Potter

----

### Special presentation:

**Tour the cabin of Columbia in 3DCourtesy of theSmithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Washington D.C.**
**Analysis of Handwritten Notes Inside the Cabin of Apollo 11 Spacecraft CM-107 "Columbia"at theSmithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Washington D.C.*The sextant mount with Michael Collins's tribute to the spacecraft. (NASM image)***

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### These files are copyright © 2008 - 2019. W. David Woods, Kenneth D. MacTaggart and Frank O'Brien.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,351
<INVENTORY>                                     31,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,534
<PP&E>                                          11,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               63
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,184
<SALES>                                         31,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,447
<CGS>                                           23,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    418
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (67)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                485
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

KLX INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS REQUIRED BY  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KLX Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amin J. Khoury, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that
to the best of my knowledge:



Date: March 6, 2015

By:

/s/ AMIN J. KHOURY Amin J. Khoury Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### FLORA KATZ AND PAUL KATZ v. RAHWAY HOSPITAL, ET AL.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*379)
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00109

- CR

MARLO DONTA PERSONS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 29371

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 O R D E R Court reporter Julie Vrooman recorded the trial court proceedings in cause number 06

- 14

- 0010 9

- CR, styled Marlo Donta Persons v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number 29, 371 in the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in this matter August 8, 2014. This deadline was extended twice by this Court on Vrooman’s request, resulting in the most recent due date of December 10, 2014. Vrooman has now filed a third request seeking an additional extension of the filing deadline. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate rec ord.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of time. Therefore, we overrule Vrooman’s third request for an extension of the filing deadline and hereby order her to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06

- 14

- 00109

- CR, styled Marlo
Donta Persons v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number 29,371 in the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than Friday, January 9, 2015. If the record is not received by January 9, we warn Vrooman that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contem pt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: December 23, 2014
#### Codding *v.*Moore and Another.

A *scire facias*to have execution in the Circuit Court on a justice’s transcript, &e. issued in the names of *Moore*and *Whitaker,*plaintiffs, — the justice’s judgment being in the same names. *Held,*that the *sdre facias*could not be sustained.

*Tuesday, July*6.

ERROR to the *La Grange*Circuit Court.

*D. H. Golerick*and *W. U.*Coombs, for the plaintiff.

*LI. Cooler,*for the defendants.

Blackford, *J.*

Scire *facias*in the names of *Moore*and *Whitaker*against *Thayer H.*Godding, to show cause why execution should not issue on a justice’s judgment against the defendant’s lands. The *scire facias*states that the plaintiffs, *Moore*and Whitaker, had obtained a judgment against the defendant before a justice of the peace; that an execution had been issued on the judgment, and returned *nulla bona;*that a transcript, &c. had been filed in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court, &c. General demurrer to the *scire facias,*and judgment for the plaintiffs awarding execution.

This judgment is erroneous. The *scire facias*should have issued in the Christian names as well as surnames of the plaintiffs, and should have contained an averment that the plaintiffs were the same persons that, by the names of *Moore*and Whitaker, had obtained the judgment on which the *scire facias*was founded. See *Jones et al.*v. Martin, *May*term, 1840. *Downard et al.*v. *Sluder, May*term, 1841. The demurrer should have been sustained.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &e.
Tracking Number 2010-03-06 (CSC-02) 


Derming the NASA Market 


NASA Advisory Council Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that NASA assess and define the NASA traffic requirements for crew 

transport to and from the International Space Station (ISS) and other Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) 

destinations prior to issuing a draft solicitation for the Commercial Crew Transportation 

program. The number of flights and/or seats per year purchased by NASA on U.S. commercial 

spaceflight vehicles has a significant impact on the business plans of and availability ofprivate 

investment for commercial providers. In assessing its requirements, NASA should consider how 

the availability of commercial space transportation capabilities could change the concept of 

operation ofthe ISS to get the most out ofits infrastructure. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with this recommendation. Crew transportation requirements for the ISS are 

defined through 2020 based on current operational and research requirements. Today, a total of 

six United States Operating Segment crewmembers are required to be rotated per year on two 

flights approximately six months apart. As part ofNASA's strategic planning process, NASA 

will consider how commercial space transportation capabilities could affect or change the ISS 

concept operations. 

From a Human Research Program (HRP) perspective, there are two ISS mission lengths that 

enable HRP research: 1) six months (or longer) to simulate exploration mission lengths; and 

2) three to four months to maximize the number of subjects for physiological experiments. Both 

ofthese ISS mission-length scenarios are valuable to HRP depending on the specific issue being 

addressed. However, increasing the number of crew rotations to four per year will essentially 

double the ISS cost for crew transportation, training, sustaining, and provisioning the additional 

crewmembers, which would amount to multiple billions of dollars in additional cost to the ISS 

Program. 

Enclosure 1
# SOFIA Arrives in New Zealand for Six-week Science Deployment

SOFIA receiving a water-arch salute from the Christchurch International Airport fire brigade after landing in New Zealand (1:55pm local time June 14, 2015; 9:55pm June 13 EDT) to begin a 6-week deployment for Southern Hemisphere science flights.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/sofia-arrives-new-zealand-six-week-science-deployment/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x689pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Space Shuttle Projects

One step closer to its maiden voyage, the Space Shuttle Orbiter Endeavour rolls out of the Vehicle Assembly Building, headed to Launch Pad 39B. Launched on May 7th 1992, the STS-49 mission was the first U.S. orbital flight to feature 4 extravehicular activities (EVAs), and the first flight to involve 3 crew members working simultaneously outside of the spacecraft. The primary objective was the capture and redeployment of the INTELSAT VI (F-3) which was stranded in an unusable orbit since its launch aboard the Titan rocket in March 1990.    

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-9255001/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMay 7, 1992ProducerMSFCSize1855x3000pxPIA Number9255001The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00026-CR

RHONDA JEAN FARMER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 42604-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rhonda Jean Farmer was convicted by a Gregg County jury of theft of stolen property 

having a value greater than or equal to $1,500.00, but less than $20,000.00. After the jury 

returned its guilty verdict, Farmer and the State entered into a post-conviction negotiated plea 

agreement recommending a sentence of two years’ incarceration in a state jail facility, suspended 

for a term of four years’ community supervision. The trial court accepted the post-conviction 

negotiated plea agreement and sentenced Farmer in accordance with the terms of that agreement. 

As a part of her agreement with the State, Farmer waived, among other things, her right to file an 

appeal. Notwithstanding that waiver, Farmer filed a notice of appeal.

On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court certified that Farmer had 

waived her right of appeal. By letter dated May 16, 2014, we informed Farmer of this potential 

jurisdictional defect and afforded her ten days in which to respond. We received no response 

from Farmer to our May 16 correspondence.

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states that an “appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made 

part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court’s

certification indicates that Farmer waived her right of appeal and because the record before us 

contains nothing to suggest that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 

615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
3

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2014

Date Decided: June 5, 2014

Do Not Publish
rmbl_ex103





  Exhibit 10.3











 



COVID-19 STIMULUS

 



CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

 


In
using the services of Wood & Huston Bank ("Bank"), to submit a
Small Business Interruption Loan Application to the Small Business
Administration ("SBA") under the Cares Act, Wholesale Express LLC
("CLIENT") understands and agrees:


 


1.
Client is responsible for instructing Bank regarding the amount of
the loan for which Client wishes to apply.


 


2.
Client is responsible for supporting the requested loan amount with
client's own documentation, information and the accuracy of which
is Client's sole responsibility.


 


3.
Client understands that submission of a loan application does not
guarantee that the SBA will approve or make the requested
loan.


 


4.
Client understands that the requested loan, if approved by the SBA,
may or may not qualify for forgiveness.


 


5.
Client understands that if the requested loan does not qualify for
forgiveness, Client must repay the loan, under the terms contained
in the loan documents.


 


6.
Client understands and agrees that Bank is not liable for delays in
transmission of the application or for any failure by the SBA to
receive the Application.


 


7.
Client understands and agrees that Bank is not responsible for
SBA's approval or disapproval of the Application.


 


8.
Client releases Bank from any claims arising out of Bank's
submission of Client's Application to the SBA.


 


9. If
Client is not an individual, signing agent for Client warrants and
represents that he/she is duly authorized and empowered to execute
this document, the related Loan Application and Promissory Note,
and any other documents in connection with the loan contemplated by
this Agreement.


 






	Thomas
Aucamp
	

 

	

 

	
/s/ Thomas
Aucamp


	

 


	
Name

	

 

	

 

	
Signature


	

 







 






5/1/2020


Date
### Appeal No. 2023AP7 3 0 Cir. Ct. No. 2021TP41



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT III

I N RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO 

### P. K.,

A PERSON UNDER THE A GE OF 

### 18:

B ROWN 

### C OUNTY 

### D EPARTMENT OF 

### H UMAN 

### S ERVICES



### ,

P ETITIONER



### - R ESPONDENT



### ,

V



### .

A. K.,

R ESPONDENT



### - A PPELLANT



### . 

### FILED

September 13,

2023

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum

, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice Hon. Tammy Jo Hock

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Cheryl Young

Juvenile Clerk

Brown County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Samantha Shaw Mabry Wagner

Electronic Notice

Steven Zaleski

Electronic Notice

Richard R. Laurent

Electronic NoticeNo. 2023AP730

2 

### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph s

1 and 11 in the above

- captioned opinion which was released on Sept ember 6, 2023

.

A corrected electronic version in its ent irety is available on the court’ s website at

www.wicourts.gov.No. 2023AP730

3
# Artemis II Crew with EGS

Artemis II NASA astronaut Christina Koch greets members of the Artemis launch team inside Firing Room 1 in the Launch Control at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Aug. 7, 2023. Koch and fellow Artemis II astronauts Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman, and CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen are at the center to meet workers and tour facilities. The approximately 10-day Artemis II flight will test NASA’s foundational human deep space exploration capabilities, the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft, for the first time with astronauts and will pave the way for lunar surface missions, including landing the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-20230807-ph-kls01_0325/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 7, 2023ProducerKSCImage CreditNASA/Kim ShiflettSize1920x1280pxPIA NumberKSC-20230807-PH-KLS01_0325National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 18, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### CITY OF JERSEY CITY v. NEWPORT CITY DEVELOPMENT CO.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.