66394 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 

9. An estimate of the total number of 

hours needed annually to complete the 

requirement or request: 68,556 hours 

(6,790 reporting plus 61,766 

recordkeeping). 

10. Abstract: NRC Form 5 is used to 

record and report the results of 

individual monitoring for occupational 

radiation exposure during a monitoring 

(one calendar year) period to ensure 

regulatory compliance with annual 

radiation dose limits specified in 10 

CFR 20.1201. 

A copy of the final supporting 

statement may be viewed free of charge 

at the NRC Public Document Room, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD 

20852. OMB clearance requests are 

available at the NRC worldwide Web 

site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/ 

doc-comment/omb/index.html. The 

document will be available on the NRC 

home page site for 60 days after the 

signature date of this notice. 

Comments and questions should be 

directed to the OMB reviewer listed 

below by November 29, 2010. 

Comments received after this date will 

be considered if it is practical to do so, 

but assurance of consideration cannot 

be given to comments received after this 

date. 

Christine J. Kymn, Desk Officer, Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

(3150–0006), NEOB–10202, Office of 

Management and Budget, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

Comments can also be e-mailed to 

Christine.J.Kymn@omb.eop.gov or 

submitted by telephone at (202) 395– 

4638. 

The NRC Clearance Officer is 

Tremaine Donnell, (301) 415–6258. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day 

of October, 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Tremaine Donnell, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27291 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2010–0262] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC). 

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of 

information collection and solicitation 

of public comment. 

SUMMARY: The NRC has recently 

submitted to OMB for review the 

following proposal for the collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby 

informs potential respondents that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

that a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The NRC published a Federal 

Register Notice with a 60-day comment 

period on this information collection on 

July 29, 2010. 

1. Type of submission, new, revision, 

or extension: Revision. 

2. The title of the information 

collection: NRC Form 4, ‘‘Cumulative 

Occupational Dose History.’’ 

3. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0005. 

4. The form number if applicable: 

NRC Form 4. 

5. How often the collection is 

required: On occasion. 

6. Who will be required or asked to 

report: NRC licensees who are required 

to comply with 10 CFR part 20. 

7. An estimate of the number of 

annual responses: 3,848 (0 reporting 

responses plus 3,848 recordkeepers). 

8. The estimated number of annual 

respondents: 3,848. 

9. An estimate of the total number of 

hours needed annually to complete the 

requirement or request: 18,410 hours. 

10. Abstract: NRC Form 4 is used to 

record the summary of a radiation 

worker’s cumulative occupational 

radiation dose, including prior 

occupational radiation exposure and the 

current year’s occupational radiation 

exposure. NRC Form 4 is used by 

licensees, and inspected by NRC, to 

ensure that occupational radiation doses 

do not exceed the regulatory limits 

specified in 10 CFR 20.1501. 

A copy of the final supporting 

statement may be viewed free of charge 

at the NRC Public Document Room, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD 

20852. OMB clearance requests are 

available at the NRC worldwide Web 

site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/ 

doc-comment/omb/index.html. The 

document will be available on the NRC 

home page site for 60 days after the 

signature date of this notice. 

Comments and questions should be 

directed to the OMB reviewer listed 

below by November 29, 2010. 

Comments received after this date will 

be considered if it is practical to do so, 

but assurance of consideration cannot 

be given to comments received after this 

date. 

Christine J. Kymn, Desk Officer, Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

(3150–0005), NEOB–10202, Office of 

Management and Budget, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

Comments can also be e-mailed to 

Christine.J.Kymn@omb.eop.gov or 

submitted by telephone at (202) 395– 

4638. 

The NRC Clearance Officer is 

Tremaine Donnell, (301) 415–6258. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day 

of October, 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Tremaine Donnell, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27290 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2010–0142] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC). 

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of 

information collection and solicitation 

of public comment. 

SUMMARY: The NRC has recently 

submitted to OMB for review the 

following proposal for the collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby 

informs potential respondents that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

that a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The NRC published a Federal 

Register Notice with a 60-day comment 

period on this information collection on 

April 4, 2010. 

1. Type of submission: Revision 

2. The title of the information 

collection: NRC Form 212 

‘‘Qualifications Investigation, 

Professional, Technical, and 

Administrative Positions’’, and NRC 

Form 212A ‘‘Qualifications Investigation 

Secretarial/Clerical’’ 

3. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0033 and 3150–0034 

4. The form number if applicable: 

NRC Form 212 ‘‘Qualifications 

Investigation, Professional, Technical, 

and Administrative Positions’’, and NRC 

Form 212A ‘‘Qualifications Investigation 

Secretarial/Clerical’’ 

5. How often the collection is 

required: The forms are collected for 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices 66395 

every new hire to the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission. 

6. Who will be required or asked to 

report: References are collected for 

every new hire. 

7. An estimate of the number of 

annual responses: NRC Form 212: 1,000 

annual responses. NRC Form 212A: 400 

annual responses. 

8. The estimated number of annual 

respondents: NRC Form 212: 1,000 

annual respondents. NRC Form 212A: 

400 annual respondents. 

9. An estimate of the total number of 

hours needed annually to complete the 

requirement or request: NRC Form 212: 

500 hours. NRC Form 212A: 100 hours. 

10. Abstract: Information requested 

on NRC Form 212, ‘‘Qualifications 

Investigation, Professional, Technical, 

and Administrative Positions (other 

than clerical positions)’’ and NRC Form 

212A, ‘‘Qualifications Investigation, 

Secretarial/Clerical’’ is used to 

determine the qualifications and 

suitability of external applicants for 

employment with NRC. The completed 

forms may be used to examine, rate and/ 

or assess the prospective employee’s 

qualifications. The information 

regarding the qualifications of 

applicants for employment is reviewed 

by professional personnel of the Office 

of Human Resources, in conjunction 

with other information in the NRC files, 

to determine the qualifications of the 

applicant for appointment to the 

position under consideration. 

A copy of the final supporting 

statement may be viewed free of charge 

at the NRC Public Document Room, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD 

20852. OMB clearance requests are 

available at the NRC worldwide Web 

site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/

doc-comment/omb/index.html. The 

document will be available on the NRC 

home page site for 60 days after the 

signature date of this notice. 

Comments and questions should be 

directed to the OMB reviewer listed 

below by November 29, 2010. 

Comments received after this date will 

be considered if it is practical to do so, 

but assurance of consideration cannot 

be given to comments received after this 

date. Christine J. Kymn, Desk Officer, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs (3150–0033 and 3150–0034), 

NEOB–10202, Office of Management 

and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. 

Comments can also be e-mailed to 

Christine.J.Kymn@omb.eop.gov or 

submitted by telephone at (202) 395– 

4638. 

The NRC Clearance Officer is 

Tremaine Donnell, (301) 415–6258. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day 

of October, 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Tremaine Donnell, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27288 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–269, 50–270, and 50–287; 

NRC–2010–0334] 

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of 

Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendment to Facility Operating 

License, Proposed No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination 

and Opportunity for a Hearing 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC, the Commission) is 

considering issuance of an amendment 

to Renewed Facility Operating License 

Nos. DPR–38, DPR–47, and DPR–55 

issued to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 

(the licensee) for operation of the 

Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 

3, (ONS) located in Oconee County, 

South Carolina. 

The proposed amendment would 

approve the transition of the fire 

protection licensing basis at ONS from 

Title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.48(b) to 

10 CFR 50.48(c), National Fire 

Protection Association (NFPA) 805. 

Before issuance of the proposed 

license amendment, the Commission 

will have made findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and the Commission’s 

regulations. 

The Commission has made a 

proposed determination that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR 

50.92, this means that operation of the 

facility in accordance with the proposed 

amendment would not (1) involve a 

significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of 

a new or different kind of accident from 

any accident previously evaluated; or 

(3) involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

(1) Does the proposed amendment involve 

a significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: No. 

Operation of ONS in accordance with the 

proposed amendment does not increase the 

probability or consequences of accidents 

previously evaluated. The Updated Final 

Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) documents 

the analyses of design basis accidents (DBA) 

at ONS. The proposed amendment does not 

adversely affect accident initiators nor alter 

design assumptions, conditions, or 

configurations of the facility and does not 

adversely affect the ability of structures, 

systems, and components (SSCs) to perform 

their design function. SSCs required to safely 

shut down the reactor and to maintain it in 

a safe shutdown (SSD) condition will remain 

capable of performing their design functions. 

The purpose of this amendment is to 

permit ONS to adopt a new fire protection 

(FP) licensing basis which complies with the 

requirements in 10 CFR 50.48(a) and (c) and 

the guidance in Revision 1 of Regulatory 

Guide (RG) 1.205. The NRC considers that 

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 

805 provides an acceptable methodology and 

performance criteria for licensees to identify 

FP systems and features that are an 

acceptable alternative to the Appendix R FP 

features (69 FR 33536, June 16, 2004). 

Engineering analyses, in accordance with 

NFPA 805, have been performed to 

demonstrate that the risk-informed, 

performance-based (RI–PB) requirements per 

NFPA 805 have been met. 

NFPA 805, taken as a whole, provides an 

acceptable alternative to 10 CFR 50.48(b) and 

satisfies 10 CFR 50.48(a) and General Design 

Criterion (GDC) 3 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 

Part 50 and meets the underlying intent of 

the NRC’s existing FP regulations and 

guidance, and achieves defense-in-depth 

(DID) and the goals, performance objectives, 

and performance criteria specified in Chapter 

1 of the standard. The small increases in core 

damage frequency associated with this LAR 

submittal are consistent with the 

Commission’s Safety Goal Policy. 

Additionally 10 CFR 50.48(c) allows self 

approval of fire protection program changes 

post-transition. If there are any increases 

post-transition in core damage frequency 

(CDF) or risk, the increase will be small and 

consistent with the intent of the 

Commission’s Safety Goal Policy. 

Based on this, the implementation of this 

amendment does not significantly increase 

the probability of any accident previously 

evaluated. Equipment required to mitigate an 

accident remains capable of performing the 

assumed function. Therefore, the 

consequences of any accident previously 

evaluated are not significantly increased with 

the implementation of this amendment. 

(2) Does the proposed amendment create 

the possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any kind of accident 

previously evaluated? 

Response: No. 

Operation of ONS in accordance with the 

proposed amendment does not create the 

possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated. Any scenario or previously 

analyzed accident with offsite dose was 

included in the evaluation of DBAs 

documented in the UFSAR. The proposed 

change does not alter the requirements or 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES