Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 66793 

reference OMB Control Number 1218– 

0218. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA). 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a currently approved 

collection. 

Title of Collection: Hydrostatic 

Testing Provision of the Standard on 

Portable Fire Extinguishers. 

Form Number: None. 

OMB Control Number: 1218–0218. 

Affected Public: Private sector; 

business or other for-profit 

organizations. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 9,066,000. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 1,335,724. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 124,084. 

Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden: 

$16,696,550. 

Dated: October 25, 2010. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27379 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; Student 

Data Form 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL) hereby announces the submission 

of the information collection request 

(ICR) sponsored by the Occupational 

Safety and Health Administration 

(OSHA) titled, ‘‘Student Data Form,’’ to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval for 

continued use in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), Public Law 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

November 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR, with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 

4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or 

sending an e-mail to 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk 

Officer for the Department of Labor, 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 

202–395–6881/Fax: 202–395–5806 

(these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 

202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or by e-mail at 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DOL 

is seeking OMB reauthorization of the 

OSHA-sponsored Student Data Form, 

OSHA Form 182. The DOL, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, submits 

information collections for OMB 

consideration after conducting a 

preclearance consultation program to 

provide the public with an opportunity 

to comment on proposed and 

continuing information collection 

requirements in accordance with the 

PRA. See 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). This 

program ensures that information is in 

the desired format, reporting burden 

(time and costs) is minimal, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

the estimate of the information 

collection burden is accurate. 

The Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970 (OSH Act) authorizes the 

OSHA to conduct education and 

training courses. See 29 U.S.C. 670. 

These courses must educate an adequate 

number of qualified personnel to fulfill 

the purposes of the OSH Act, provide 

them with short-term training, inform 

them of the importance and proper use 

of safety and health equipment, and 

train employers and workers to 

recognize, avoid, and prevent unsafe 

and unhealthful working conditions. 

The OSHA Training Institute provides 

basic, intermediate, and advanced 

training and education in occupational 

safety and health for Federal and State 

compliance officers, OSHA 

professionals and technical-support 

personnel, employers, workers, 

organizations representing workers and 

employers, educators who develop 

curricula and teach occupational safety 

and health courses, and representatives 

of professional safety and health groups. 

Students attending OSHA Training 

Institute courses complete a one-page 

Student Data Form on the first day of 

class. The Student Data Form collects 

information under five major categories; 

course information, personal data, 

employer data, emergency contacts, and 

student groups. The OSHA uses 

information provided on the Student 

Data Form to contact a designated 

person in case of an emergency, to 

prepare certain OSH Act-required 

reports, tuition receipts, to evaluate 

training output, and to make decisions 

regarding program/course revisions, 

budget support, and tuition costs. 

The Student Data Form constitutes an 

information collection within the 

meaning of the PRA. A Federal agency 

generally cannot conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it is 

currently approved by the OMB under 

the PRA and displays a currently valid 

OMB Control Number. Furthermore, the 

public is generally not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information if the 

collection of information does not 

display a currently valid OMB Control 

Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 

1320.6. 

The DOL obtains approval for this 

information collection under OMB 

Control Number 1218–0172, and the 

current approval is scheduled to expire 

on October 31, 2010. For additional 

information, see the related notice 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 8, 2010 (75 FR 39279). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. In 

order to ensure appropriate 

consideration, comments should 

reference OMB Control Number 1218– 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

66794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 

0172. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA). 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title of Collection: Student Data 

Form. 

Form Number: OSHA Form 182. 

OMB Control Number: 1218–0172. 

Affected Public: Individuals; business 

or other for-profit organizations; Federal 

government; State, Local, or Tribal 

governments. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 2000. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 2000. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 160. 

Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden: 

$0. 

Dated: October 14, 2010. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27378 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,722] 

Sojitz Corporation of America, a 

Subsidiary of Sojitz Corporation, 

Forest Products Department, Seattle, 

WA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated September 23, 

2010, by a Washington State workforce 

official requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of Sojitz 

Corporation of America, a subsidiary of 

Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products 

Department, Seattle, Washington 

(subject firm). The determination was 

issued on September 1, 2010. The 

Department’s Notice of Determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517). 

The workers provide services related to 

the trade of forest products. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that the subject firm did 

not, during the period under 

investigation, shift to a foreign country 

the supply of services like or directly 

competitive with the services performed 

by the workers or acquire these services 

from a foreign country; that the workers’ 

separation, or threat of separation, was 

not related to any increase in imports of 

like or directly competitive services; 

and that the workers did not produce an 

article or supply a service that was 

directly used in the production of an 

article or the supply of service by a firm 

that employed a worker group that is 

eligible to apply for TAA based on the 

aforementioned article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners alleged that the subject firm 

has shifted services to a foreign country. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the petitioning workers 

meet the eligibility requirements of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27388 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,572; TA–W–71,572A; TA–W– 

71,572B; TA–W–71,572C] 

Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration: TA–W–71,572, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Martins Ferry, OH; TA–W–71,572A, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Yorkville, OH; TA–W–71,572B, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., Mingo 

Junction, OH; TA–W–71,572C, 

Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary 

of Severstal North America, Inc., 

Steubenville, OH 

By applications dated May 15 and 

May 21, 2010, United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union (USW), 

requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on March 

3, 2010, and the Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21363). 

The subject workers produce 

galvanized coil (TA–W–71,572), cold 

rolled coils and back plate coils (TA– 

W–71,572A), hot rolled coils (TA–W– 

71,572B), and cold rolled coils (TA–W– 

71,572C). 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that there was no 

increase in imports of like or directly 

competitive articles produced at subject 

facilities and no shift to/acquisition 

from a foreign country by the subject 

firm of like or directly competitive 

articles produced at the subject 

facilities. 

The investigation also revealed that 

the firm did not produce an article or 

supply a service that was used by a firm 

with TAA-certified workers in the 

production of an article or supply of a 

service that was the basis for TAA 

certification. 

The Department of Labor has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES