alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Artemis I Rollout

NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket with the Orion spacecraft aboard is seen atop the mobile launcher as it is rolled up the ramp at Launch Pad 39B, Wednesday, Aug. 17, 2022, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. NASA’s Artemis I mission is the first integrated test of the agency’s deep space exploration systems: the Orion spacecraft, SLS rocket, and supporting ground systems. Launch of the uncrewed flight test is targeted for no earlier than Aug. 29. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/artemis-i-rollout-18/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 17, 2022Image CreditNASA/Joel KowskySize4434x2891pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 26, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
3 min read

# NASA and Crayola Education Collaborate to Fuse STEM, Space, and Art

### Rachel H. Kraft

May 11, 2022

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA and Crayola Education are collaborating to infuse art and creativity with the unique teachings of space. As part of its mission to inspire the world through discovery, the agency is leveraging its compelling science, technology, engineering, and math content with Crayola’s work to bring creativity into classrooms and other learning environments. The two signed a Space Act Agreement April 28 to formalize the relationship.

“Working with organizations that are rooted in educational communities help us make space accessible to more young people,” said Mike Kincaid, NASA associate administrator for STEM Engagement. “NASA is continuously seeking to explore and understand the universe, and part of what we do is to help spark a sense of wonder to inspire others to do the same. We want to build a diverse STEM workforce and creative experiences that make space available to others helps us do that.”

The two organizations, in association with HarperCollins Children’s Books, also are collaborating in honor of the 75th anniversary of the publication of *Goodnight Moon*, the iconic children’s book by Margaret Wise Brown and illustrated by Clement Hurd, that has been a fixture in many households with small children across the world for decades.

On May 18, Crayola Education will host a “Read Along, Draw Along” of Goodnight Moon, an interactive session in which stories are brought to life through art. The story will be read aloud by NASA astronaut Tom Marshburn who recorded the reading during his expedition aboard the International Space Station. Marshburn recently returned to Earth after spending 177 days in space. The activity also will include an inspirational message from NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy and a question-and-answer session about life and work in space and NASA’s Artemis efforts with Marshburn and fellow NASA astronaut Mark Vande Hei, who recently returned from U.S. record-breaking mission of 355 days aboard the station.

NASA is exploring the Moon under Artemis, with plans for an uncrewed flight test later this year of the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System rocket, the first in a series of increasingly complex missions to the Moon in preparation for human missions to Mars.

With this partnership, NASA and Crayola will collaborate on several digital and virtual activities and events designed to engage, inspire, and educate the public about space and NASA’s missions. Crayola Education will develop, in collaboration with agency teams and experts, a series of activations to engage the public in NASA mission content and related educational resources as part of Crayola Creativity Week, a free program for schools and homes around the world designed to celebrate children’s creativity and the joy it brings to teaching and learning any subject.

To learn more about NASA’s STEM Engagement, visit: stem.nasa.gov
#### Anne Cooley v. Michael Foltz.

*Evidence*— Witnesses—Physicians—Privileged *communications.*

1. Physicians whose sole knowledge of the ailments and. condition of a patient , is acquired in their professional capacity are disqualified under How. Stat. § 7516, from testifying to such condition and ailments. *Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge,*81 Mich. 525.

2. In a suit to recover damages for an alleged assault and battery, the plaintiff called one physician, not a graduate of any regular school of medicine, who testified to her injuries, but failed to produce two other physicians who had been called to treat *48her both before and after the alleged trouble with the defendant; which neglect is held to be a legitimate fact for the jury to consider in determining the merits of the case, plaintiff having claimed her statutory privilege when they were tendered as witnesses by the defendant.

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.)

Argued February 5, 1891.

Decided February 27, 1891.

Case. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Avery, JenJcs <& Avery,*for appellant.

*George P. Voorheis,*for defendant.

Grant, J.

This is an action of tort. The plaintiff's declaration contains two counts, — one for assault and battery; the other, malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff introduced one physician, known as an *“*eclectic,” and who had never graduated at any regular school of medicine, who testified to her injuries. The defendant then introduced two physicians as witnesses who had been called to treat her both before and after the alleged trouble with the defendant. They obtained no knowledge of her ailments and condition except what they had obtained in their professional capacity. This testimony was objected to as inadmissible under Iiow. Stat. § 7516. The objection was well taken, and the testimony should haye been excluded. *Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge,*81 Mich. 525, and authorities there cited. The entire'subject is there fully discussed, rendering further mention here unnecessary. The defendant evidently recognizes the error, as he has filed no brief in' this Court.

In the event of a new trial it is proper to say that it was competent for the defense to introduce these wit*49nesses, and prove by them that they had been called by the plaintiff to examine and prescribe for her. The failure of the plaintiff to produce them as witnesses was a legitimate fact for the jury in determining the merits of the case. One of the physicians testified that-after he had been called by the plaintiff, and had examined her, she told him that she had sued Mr. Foltz, and there was going to be a lawsuit o4er-it, and that she would want him as a witness. This testimony had no reference to her condition, and was competent. Such statements are not within the statute.

For the error above mentioned the judgment must be reversed, with the costs of this Court, and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,123
<PP&E>                                          41,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               84
<BONDS>                                          2,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,267
<SALES>                                            542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,397
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    834
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                834
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       834
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
#### JAMES RICHARDSON v. HOWARD L. BEYER, ETC.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ARMANDO BERMUDEZ-TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-4206

(D.C. No. 2:09-CR-00423-CW-1)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, MURPHY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed

pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc)

(per curiam). In response, defendant concedes that the government’s motion is

well taken, and that the appeal should be dismissed, because the appeal falls

Appellate Case: 09-4206 Document: 01018377043 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 1
-2-

within the scope of the appeal waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily

waived his appellate rights, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a

miscarriage of justice. See id. at 1325. 

Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM

Appellate Case: 09-4206 Document: 01018377043 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Idenix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, David A. Arkowitz, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 17, 2005


                                        /s/ David A. Arkowitz
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David A. Arkowitz
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Idenix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARKO BEY.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


National Advisory Council on Migrant Health; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Dates and Times: February 10, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., 
February 11, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Red Lion Hotel on Fifth Avenue, 1415 Fifth Avenue, 
Seattle, Washington 98101, Telephone: 206-971-8000, Fax: 206-971-
8100.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public.
    Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and 
issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and 
their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services.
    Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of the Council's general 
business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from 
experts on farmworker issues, including the status of farmworker 
health at the local and national levels.
    In addition, the Council will be holding a public hearing at 
which migrant farmworkers, community leaders, and providers will 
have the opportunity to testify before the Council regarding matters 
that affect the health of migrant farmworkers. The hearing is 
scheduled for Thursday, February 11 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., at the 
Red Lion Hotel on Fifth Avenue.
    The Council meeting is being held in conjunction with the 
Western Migrant Stream Forum sponsored by the Northwest Regional 
Primary Care Association, which is being held in Seattle, 
Washington, February 12-14, 2010.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.
    For Further Information Contact: Gladys Cate, Office of Minority 
and Special Populations, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health 
Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Maryland 
20857; telephone (301) 594-0367.

    Dated: January 5, 2010.
Sahira Rafiullah,
Deputy Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 2010-274 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 21, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________

No. 09-12513

__________

D.C. Docket No. 99-02054-CT-30-TGW 

EZELL GILBERT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent-Appellee.

____________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

____________

BEFORE: DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN, and HILL, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Absent a stay or withholding of the mandate in the appeal to which this

Order is appended, the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate within ten (10) days
of the date of this opinion. Consistent with Eleventh Circuit Rule 41-2, the Clerk

is directed to provide the active members of this court with notice of the issuance

of this opinion and our direction to expedite issuance of the mandate.

SO ORDERED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1997 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,427
<SECURITIES>                                 4,464,536
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,534
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   478
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,521,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,157,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     65,805
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,521,181
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,070
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   623
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,551
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49
        

</TABLE>
# Liftoff of shuttle Challenger and mission STS 51-B

51B-S-052 (20 April 1985) --- The STS 51-B Spacelab 3 mission begins with the liftoff of the Challenger from Pad 39A at 12:02 p.m. (EDT).  The Spacelab-3 configuration consists of a long module and a Mission Experiment Support Structure (MPESS).  The object of the mission is to conduct applications, science and technology-oriented experimentation requiring the low-gravity of Earth orbit and extended duration stable vehicle attitude. Mission emphasis will be on materials processing. The seven-member crew consists of astronauts Robert F Overmyer, commander; Frederick D. Gregory, pilot; Don L. Lind, Norman E. Thagard and William E. Thornton; all mission specialists and payload specialists Taylor G. Wang and Lodewijk van den Berg.  The mission is planned for 7 days with a landing at Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards California scheduled for May 6.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-51b-s-052/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 29, 1985ProducerJSCSize1919x906pxPIA Number51b-s-052The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 14, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Saturn Apollo Program

The Apollo 11 mission, the first manned lunar mission, launched from the Kennedy Space Center, Florida via the Saturn V launch vehicle on July 16, 1969 and safely returned to Earth on July 24, 1969. The Saturn V vehicle was developed by the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) under the direction of Dr. Wernher von Braun. Aboard were astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, commander; Michael Collins, Command Module (CM) pilot; and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr., Lunar Module (LM) pilot. The CM, piloted by Michael Collins remained in a parking orbit around the Moon while the LM, named “Eagle’’, carrying astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, landed on the Moon. Armstrong was the first human to ever stand on the lunar surface, followed by Edwin (Buzz) Aldrin.  During 21⁄2 hours of surface exploration, the crew collected 47 pounds of lunar surface material for analysis back on Earth. Shown here is the recovery operation of the capsule in the Pacific Ocean after splashdown. The three astronauts wait in the life raft as a pararescue man closes and secures the capsule hatch. The crew was then air lifted to the prime recovery ship, the U.S.S. Hornet, where they were housed in a Mobile Quarantine Facility (MQF).        

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-6900604/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 24, 1969ProducerMSFCSize1920x1536pxPIA Number6900604The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
August 5, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE CALVIN T. P OWELL

NO. 14

- 14

- 00 325

- CR

________________________________ This caus e was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion and this decision be certified below for observance.