alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the quarterended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report’), I, William P. McComas, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 
| Dated: May  11, 2003 | By:    | /s/ William  P. McComas                            |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | William P.  McComas                                |
|                 |   | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the quarterended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) I, Michael P. Shaunnessy, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 
| Dated: May  11, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Michael  P. Shaunnessy                            |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Michael P.  Shaunnessy                                |
|                 |   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 28, 2008

Mr. Joel J. Steed

1010 West Ralph Hall Parkway, Suite 200

One Horizon Ridge, 2nd Floor

Rockwall, TX 75032

Mr. Wade Nolan Hallisey

Potter Minton, P.C.

P.O. Box 359

Tyler, TX 75710

Honorable Kerry L. Russell

7th District Court

100 N Broadway Rm 203

Tyler, TX 75702-7236

Mr. Ken W. Good

Kent, Good, Anderson & Bush,  P.C.

1121 E.S.E. Loop 323, Suite 200

Tyler, TX 75701

Ms. Diana L. Faust

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. William H. "Bill" Liebbe

Law Offices of Bill Liebbe

223 South Bonner Ave.

Tyler, TX 75702

RE:Case Number:  06-0369

Court of Appeals Number:  12-06-00040-CV

Trial Court Number:  05-3141-B/A

Style:IN RE  JACK JORDEN, M.D., ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions in the above-referenced cause.  Relators’ Joint Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief is dismissed as moot.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 06-0369Page 2**
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DARREN ODOM.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 13,519.

#### The Eagle Machine Works *v.*Arens et al.

Supreme *Court.*— Pleading.—Sustaining *Demurrer to General Denial.*— Re*versal of Judgment.*— Where it appears by the record that a demurrer was sustained to a general denial well pleaded to an affirmative answer, the judgment must be reversed, as the Supreme Court is bound to act upon the record as it comes to it.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*J. A. New*and *J. W. Jones,*for appellant.

*L. H. Reynolds,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

There is only one paragraph of the reply in the record, designated as the second paragraph, and that paragraph is the general denial. A demurrer was addressed to the second paragraph of the reply, and it was sustained. It was, of course, error to sustain a demurrer to a general denial well pleaded, as was that contained in the second paragraph of the reply, to an affirmative answer. We are bound *234
      *to*act upon the record as it comes to us, and we can see no escape from the appellant’s contention. The paragraph of the reply was numbered as a second paragraph, and in the body of the pleading it is recited: “And for a second and further reply, etc.,” thus positively designating the paragraph as the second.

Filed April 9, 1890.

It may be true, as appellees’ counsel contends, that the demurrer was intended for a different paragraph of the reply, but it is expressly addressed to the second paragraph, and, in the face of this fact, we can not infer that it was intended for some other paragraph than that to which it is directly addressed.

As the record presents the question to us we can not do otherwise than reverse the judgment.

Judgment reversed.
# Sitemap

## May 14, 2021

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2021
- 05
- May 14, 2021

            - NASA Awards Contract for Information Technology Support
            - NASA Additively Manufactured Rocket Engine Hardware Passes Cold Spray, Hot Fire Tests
            - NASA to Help Local Governments Plan for Advanced Air Mobility
            - Interested in Becoming a NASA Citizen Scientist? Meet Us Virtually at CitSciCon
            - In Case You Missed It: A Weekly Summary of Top Content from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
            - Texas, Minnesota, Ohio Students to Hear from Astronauts in Space
            - New NASA Data Sheds (Sun) Light on Climate Models
            - Season 5, Episode 4: Always an Astronaut, with Ken Bowersox
            - Trailblazing International Partnerships
            - Robotic Navigation Tech Will Explore the Deep Ocean
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the report of Spectre Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell C. Mix, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and I Kevin M. Greer, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Russell C. Mix


Russell
      C. Mix


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2006





/s/
      Kevin M. Greer


Kevin
      M.
      Greer


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      12,
      2006
# Sitemap

## December 16, 2013

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2013
- 12
- December 16, 2013

            - Johnson Space Center Seeks Bold Ideas for Technology Development
            - Doubling Down With Rare White Dwarf Systems
            - SLS Chief Engineer Driven by ‘Challenge’ of Building America’s Next Great Rocket
            - James Webb Space Telescope Sunshield Waterfall
            - ‘Skip’ Mackey Remembered by Colleagues as ‘Voice of NASA’
            - NASA Receives Third Consecutive Clean Audit Opinion
            - Launch of Apollo 8
            - Test Article for Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project
            - Preparing a Test Article
            - Spotlight on Webb Telescope Test
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 27, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ALAN SANDMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RON WILEY, Warden, Federal Prison

Camp - Florence,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-1428

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01291-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1428 Document: 01018356784 Date Filed: 01/27/2010 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ODWALLA,
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 1998 AS
FILED ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING
ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                           2,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                       666
<INVENTORY>                                      3,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,450
<PP&E>                                          20,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,065
<BONDS>                                            800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,499
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,831
<SALES>                                         15,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,332
<CGS>                                            7,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    58
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (84)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
2 min read

# NASA’s Weekly Video Clips Feature Launch of New Space Station Crew, Cargo Resupply Mission

### NASA

Oct 24, 2016

MEDIA ADVISORYM16-022

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA’s weekly video highlights for Oct. 16-22, 2016, feature the launch of three new crew members representing the United States and Russia to the International Space Station to join Expedition 49, as well as the launch of an Orbital ATK resupply cargo spacecraft from Wallops Island, Virginia to the station with more than 5,100 pounds of research and supplies. Get to know the newest American space station crew member in the video, “A Moment with Shane Kimbrough.”

**http://jscfeatures.jsc.nasa.gov/videoupdate/**

Or, have the weekly video highlights link, as well as Johnson Space Center news releases and other information delivered automatically to your e-mail inbox by sending an e-mail message with the subject line “Subscribe” to:

 **jsc-news-request@lists.nasa.gov**

NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston shares hundreds of hours of raw video from the space station and other NASA human spaceflight programs – some of it high- definition video — and support activities on archive.org each week. The files can be large, sometimes 20 gigabytes or larger. This new weekly video highlights page includes postings that date back to January 2016. Go back to earlier weekly uploads by clicking on the navigation buttons at the bottom of the highlights web page.

Daily written updates about experiments and operations aboard the space station are available in the International Space Station Blog, which also provides comprehensive coverage during dynamic events.

Get breaking news, images, videos and features about NASA’s Johnson Space Center, the home of Mission Control and the astronauts, at:

**http://jsc.nasa.gov**

-end-

Rachel KraftJohnson Space Center, Houston281-483-5111rachel.h.kraft@nasa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE> 5
 <LEGEND>
 This Schedule contains summary financial
 information extracted from the financial
 statements contained in the body of the
 accompanying Form 10-Q of MUZAK LIMITED
 PARTNERSHIP and is qualified in its
 entirety by reference to such financial
 statements.
 </LEGEND>
 <MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
        
 <S>                           <C>
 <CIK>                         0001013763
 <NAME>                        MUZAK CAPITAL CORPORATION
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
 <PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
 <CASH>                        1,574
 <SECURITIES>                  0
 <RECEIVABLES>                 14,946
 <ALLOWANCES>                  608
 <INVENTORY>                   3,267
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>              21,517
 <PP&E>                        63,656
 <DEPRECIATION>                27,511
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                94,254
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         38,936
 <BONDS>                       40,439
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
 <PREFERRED>                   0
 <COMMON>                      0
 <OTHER-SE>                    0
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  94,254
 <SALES>                       64,560
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>              64,560
 <CGS>                         27,386
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                 27,386
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>              14,932
 <LOSS-PROVISION>              0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,393
 <INCOME-PRETAX>               (5,902)
 <INCOME-TAX>                  0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>           (5,902)
 <DISCONTINUED>                0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>               0
 <CHANGES>                     0
 <NET-INCOME>                  (5,902)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
 <EPS-DILUTED>                 0
         


</TABLE>
# Mississippi Valley Division is ready for an active hurricane season

**VICKSBURG, Miss. -- **
Today marks the first official day of the 2022 hurricane season, which runs through Nov. 30. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has predicted an above-average season with a forecast of 14 to 21 named storms.

In preparation for the season, team members from Mississippi Valley Division’s Readiness and Contingency Operations office and its emergency operations centers attended the National Hurricane Conference in Orlando. The conference allowed opportunities to improve the region’s hurricane preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation in order to save lives and critical resources in MVD’s area of operations.

While still in active response to Hurricane Ida for over 250 days, MVD hosted a combined in-person and virtual hurricane tabletop exercise with Maj. Gen. Holland, the divisions’ commander in attendance. The division’s crisis management team, key leaders and emergency managers from the districts, the enterprise’s Planning and Response Teams, the logistics activity, Engineering Research Development Center’s unmanned aircraft system team, the operations center representative for Corps of Engineers headquarters and FEMA partners from regions four and six were also in attendance.

The two-day event addressed training objectives derived from lessons learned from two years of consecutive responses from Hurricanes Ida, Laura, and Delta.

Mississippi Valley Division with lessons learned will continue to work closely throughout the 2022 hurricane season with its staff, and local, state and federal partners to respond to threats and impacts that may affect our area of responsibility as safely and timely as possible.

Every year, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, part of the federal government’s unified national response to disasters and emergencies, sends hundreds of people to respond to disasters around the world. Here at home, USACE assists the Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency as the primary agency for public works and engineering-related emergency support. FEMA assigns USACE missions to include: debris management, temporary housing, temporary roofing, emergency power, infrastructure assessment, and support to urban search and rescue.

Before a hurricane is expected in your area, be sure you have an updated family hurricane plan. Have your hurricane survival kit ready and be familiar with evacuation routes and zones. Be prepared, be aware and take action if the need arises.

For more information on hurricane preparedness measures, visit:

FEMA individual preparedness: www.ready.gov/hurricanes

National Hurricane Center: www.nhcnoaa.gov/prepare

American Red Cross: www.redcross.org/prepare/disaster/hurricane

 

-30-

Release no. 22-052

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Mississippi Valley  Division

hurricane season 2022

emergency preparation
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited
on Form 10-Q for the  period  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger,  as
Executive Chairman of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1)  The   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  November 14, 2003                         By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Exhibit 10.6






August
10, 2009
 
 
 Octus,
Inc.
 803
Second Street, Suite 303
 Davis, CA
95616
 Attention:
Board of Directors
 
 
 Dear
Ladies/Gentlemen:
 
 This
letter will memorialize and confirm the agreement of Octus, Inc. (the “Company”)
and the undersigned (“Officer”)
relating to the employment agreement dated February 24, 2009, between the
Company and Officer (the “Employment
Agreement”).  The Employment Agreement provides that Officer
will receive compensation at a base salary rate set forth in the Employment
Agreement.  In consideration of the Company’s current state of
operations and cash position, the Company and Officer have agreed that some or
all (with the amount determined by the board of directors of the Company, with
Officer not participating in such decision) of the base compensation amounts
payable to Officer pursuant to the Employment Agreement will be deferred [until
such time as the Company, in the good faith judgment of the board of directors
(with Officer not participating in such decision), has sufficient cash resources
(in light of its other obligations and commitments) to pay the deferred
amounts.  In all events, however, any deferred amounts with respect to
the 2009 year will be paid no later than March 15, 2010.
 
 Very
truly yours,
 
 OCTUS,
INC.
 By:
      /s/ George EckerGeorge
      Ecker
                          Its:
      Chief Financial Officer
 
 OFFICER /s/
      Christian SoderquistChristian
      Soderquist
#### Wilcox *v.*Edwards.

Tuesday, *November*19

To a plea of the statute of limitations in slander, the plaintiff replied that the suit was commenced within one year next after the speaking of the words. Issue on the replication. *Held,*that this issue was not immaterial. Words charging a person with having been guilty of a malicious trespass are actionable.

ERROR to the *Hendricks*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of slander brought by *Edwards*against *Wilcox.*The following words were laid in the declaration and were proved: *44Edwards*(meaning the plaintiff) killed *Kelly’s*hogs, and he (meaning *Kelly)*ought to get out a warrant and have him (meaning the plaintiff) bound over to Court or sent to jail.” Pleas, the general issue and the statute of limitations. Replication to the special plea, that the suit was commenced within one year next after the speaking of the words as alleged. Issue on the replication. The Court left it to the jury to determine, whether the plaintiff had proved 44 the speaking of the words, with the innuendoes, within one year next before the commencement of the suit; ” and the jury were instructed, that, if they found the words to have been so spoken, to assess the plaintiff’s damages. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff in error relies on two grounds. 1. That the issue on the replication is immaterial. 2. That the words are not actionable.

*184
      *C.*Fletcher, 0. Butler, and *C. C. Nave,*for the plaintiff.

*H. Brown*and *W. Quarles,*for the defendant.

There is nothing in the first objection. The replication is informal, but the defendant made no objection to it. The question was substantially raised by the pleadings, whether the words had been spoken within the prescribed time; and the *onus probandi*was on the plaintiff. The case was correctly presented by the Court to the consideration of the jury, and they have determined it against the defendant. We shall not disturb their verdict.

The second objection is also untenable. The words amount to a charge, that the plaintiff had been guilty of malicious trespass. That is an indictable offence; and the punishment for it is a fine “in any sum not exceeding two fold the value of the property destroyed or of the damage done, *and*imprisonment for any term of time not exceeding twelve months.” R. C. 1831, p. 187. R. S. 1838, p. 213. As corporal punishment is the consequence of a conviction of the offence charged, the words are actionable. 2 Leigh’s N. P. 1350.—*Onslow*v. Horne, 3 Wils. 177.—Starkie on Slander, 41. Besides, the offence in question belongs to that class of offences which attach infamy to the person who commits any of them.

*Per Curiam.*

The 'judgment is affirmed, with 6 *per cent.*damages and costs.