alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUREAU OF PRISONS; ADM. OFFICE

OF THE U.S. COURTS; JUDICIAL

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE; ERIC

HOLDER, Atty. General;

CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL;

DEBORAH A. LOCKE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-1513

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01873-ZLW)

ORDER

In a January 19, 2010 Order, a panel of this court directed Appellant-Plaintiff Young

to prepay the full filling fee in the district court by February 1, 2010. Appellant was warned

that failure to prepay the full filing fee by February 1, 2010 would result in dismissal of this

appeal without further notice.

Upon consideration, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. See 10th Cir.

Appellate Case: 09-1513 Document: 01018363210 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 1
2

R. 42.1. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1513 Document: 01018363210 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1647 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1647

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
   access to audiologists for medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2003

  Mr. Campbell (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
   access to audiologists for medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hearing Health Accessibility Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. DIRECT ACCESS TO QUALIFIED AUDIOLOGISTS FOR MEDICARE 
              BENEFICIARIES.

    Section 1861(ll)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x(ll)(2)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, without regard to any requirement that the individual 
receiving the audiology services be under the care of (or referred by) 
a physician or other health care practitioner or that such services are 
provided under the supervision of a physician or other health care 
practitioner''.

SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF AUDIOLOGY SERVICES AS A PART B MEDICAL SERVICE; 
              PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (U), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (V)(iii), by inserting ``and'' after 
        the semicolon at the end; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(W) audiology services (as defined in subsection 
        (ll)(2));''.
    (b) Payment Under the Physician Fee Schedule.--Section 1848(j)(3) 
of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting 
``(2)(W),'' after ``(2)(S),''.

SEC. 4. CONSTRUCTION; EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to expand 
the scope of audiology services for which payment may be made under 
title XVIII of the Social Security Act as of December 31, 2003.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take 
effect with respect to services furnished on or after January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
2 min read

# Atmospheric Science Branch Chief Dr. Charles Gatebe

### Michelle Zajac

Feb 16, 2024

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

“I was born and raised in Kenya and come from a very humble background. I’m one of nine kids and the third born, meaning that I started responsibilities very early because we had to help our mother. Almost every two to three years, she had a baby, so you can imagine she was a very, very strong woman and powerful, too. When I think about that past, she is the person, and my father as well, who taught us that we can overcome any obstacle. It doesn’t matter what it is.

“I remember going to school without fees, and they would send me home. One time, when I was complaining about being sent home because of my lack of school fees, [my mother] could see I was affected by all this. She told me, ‘Those kids you see out there that look like they come from higher, well-off families came to this world the same way you came. So, you are no different than them. Don’t look at the material wealth and think you are less than them.’ 

“That’s the background that shaped me. It instilled a sense of believing in yourself. Anyone you see on the streets, their color or background doesn’t matter; we all come into this world the same way. You’re equipped with skills, so find your passion and go for it. 

“When I look at that background, it’s the one that has helped me come this far.”

– Dr. Charles Gatebe, Chief of Atmospheric Science Branch, NASA’s Ames Research Center

*Image Credit: NASA / Brandon TorresInterviewer: NASA / Tahira Allen*

Check out some of our other Faces of NASA.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**Section
      1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer**








In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      P, Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
      the
      report.









Date: 
                May 1, 2006
            /s/
                Douglas P.
                Baker
              Douglas
                P. Baker
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.3
I, John A. Betts, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 12, 2004 /s/ John A. Betts  John A. Betts Corporate Controller
Exhibit 31.2



Huttig Building Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David L. Fleisher, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of Huttig Building Products, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005 |  | /s/ David L. Fleisher                                 
|                     |  | David L. Fleisher                                     
|                     |  | Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



9
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 

OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

————————————————— 

IN RE RICK A. SANDOVAL, 

 Debtor. 

__________________________________ 

CRYSTAL L. PEREA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RICK A. SANDOVAL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

BAP No. CO-10-012 

Bankr. No. 08-30171 

Adv. No. 09-01167 

Chapter 7 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

April 23, 2010 

————————————————— 

On April 8, 2010, this Court entered a Notice of Deficiency and Order to Show 

Cause ("Order"), requiring the Appellant Rick A. Sandoval to do the following, or the 

appeal would be dismissed: 

File a proof of service for the Response to Notice of Deficiency, filed April 6, 

2010. 

The deadline has expired without any response to the Order. 

BAP Appeal No. 10-12 Docket No. 23-1 Filed: 04/23/2010 Page: 1 of 2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure 

to prosecute. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8018-4. 

 For the Panel: 

Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court 

 By: 

 

 Gregory Wright 

Deputy Clerk 

2

BAP Appeal No. 10-12 Docket No. 23-1 Filed: 04/23/2010 Page: 2 of 2
#### Doe, on the Demise of Bowen, *v.*Holmes.—On appeal.

*Monday, June*1.

IF a conveyance of real estate, regularly recorded, be relied on by a suitor not a party to it, the record book is admissible to prove the contents of the conveyance. *Bowser et al.*v. *Warren,*4 Blackf. *522.*—Dixon v. *Doe, d. Lasselle, ante,*106.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**84 CA 14-00708**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

RICHARD H. WARNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN OF MARY DOROTHY WARNER, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 98768.)

-------------------------------------------------- RICHARD H. WARNER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY DOROTHY WARNER, DECEASED, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 105712) (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE COSGROVE LAW FIRM, BUFFALO (EDWARD C. COSGROVE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JEFFREY W. LANG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered March 26, 2014. The order denied the motion of claimant seeking leave to reargue and renew.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Warner v State of New York ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 6, 2015]).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD E. COHEN                           
|Edward E. Cohen                               
|Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|February 29, 2008
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1876
Filed 6/18/14 P. v. Roberson CA4/1 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION ONE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

JEFFREY ROBERSON, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 D065372 

 (Super. Ct. No. SCE328755) 

 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, John M. 

Thompson, Judge. Affirmed. 

 Steven J. Carroll, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 

 Jeffrey Roberson pled guilty to attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 664) during 

which he personally used a firearm (id., § 12022.5, subd. (a)) and caused the victim great 
2 

bodily injury (id., § 12022.7, subd. (a)). In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, 

the trial court sentenced Roberson to prison for an aggregate term of 14 years. 

Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings in 

the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal, but asked this court to review 

the record for error in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). 

Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel suggested as 

possible issues whether Roberson's guilty plea was constitutionally valid and whether 

there was a proper factual basis for the plea. After we received counsel's brief, we 

notified Roberson by letter he could file a supplemental brief, but he did not respond. 

 We have reviewed the entire record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and 

Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and considered the issues suggested by counsel, but 

discerned no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Roberson has been represented 

adequately by counsel on this appeal. 

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment is affirmed. 

IRION, J. 

WE CONCUR: 

MCCONNELL, P. J. 

BENKE, J.
# Sarah Douglas

Strategic Communications

Sarah Douglas is a Strategic Communications Specialist supporting NASA’s Center of Excellence for Collaborative Innovation (CoECI).
No. 87-6428.

#### Santiago *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
10.3


 


RocketFuel
Blockchain, Inc.


3651
Lindell Road, Suite D565


Las
Vegas, NV 89103


(702)
318-7518


 


May
1, 2020


 


Investorlisten
ApS


Fruebjergvej
3,


Symbion


2100
Copenhagen


Denmark


 


	 	Re:	Warrant
    to Purchase Shares of Common Stock


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


We
have today issued to you our Warrant No. W-2, dated May 1, 2020 (the “Warrant”), to purchase 1,500,000 shares
of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc. (the “Company”), at a purchase
price of $1.00 per share.


 


This
letter agreement will confirm that upon the exercise in full of the Warrant on or before its expiration date of April 30, 2021,
the Company will issue to you an second warrant to purchase 1,500,000 additional shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of
$1.50 per share. This Warrant will have a term expiring 12 months from the date of issuance and will otherwise be in form and
substance substantially the same as the Warrant.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Bennett J. Yankowitz
	 	Chief
    Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12.1

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(UNAUDITED)

Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.

(amounts in thousands except ratios)



|                                                |  |                  |          |    
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -------- | ---
|                                                |  | December 31,2007 |         
|Earnings:                                       |  |                  |          |    
|Loss before income tax expense(1)               |  | $                | (144,309 | )  
|Fixed charges                                   |  |                  | 63,385   |    
|Interest capitalized                            |  |                  | (3,259   | )  
|Amortization of previously capitalized interest |  |                  | 123      |    
|                                                |  |                  |          |    
|Total                                           |  | $                | (84,060  | )  
|                                                |  |                  |          |    
|Fixed Charges:                                  |  |                  |          |    
|Interest cost and debt expense                  |  |                  | 61,526   |    
|Interest allocable to rental expense(2)         |  |                  | 1,859    |    
|                                                |  |                  |          |    
|Total                                           |  | $                | 63,385   |    
|                                                |  |                  |          |    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              |  |                  |         | (3)
|                                                |  |                  |          |    



|(1) | Includes a non-cash loss recognized on derivatives of $169.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Represents one-third of the total operating lease rental expense which is that portion deemed to be interest.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Due to the Partnerships loss for the year ended December 31, 2007, its earnings were insufficient to cover its fixed charges by $147.4 million.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,729]


International Paper, Pineville Mill, Industrial Packaging Group, 
Pineville, LA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated November 2, 2009, the company official from 
the subject firm requested administrative reconsideration of the 
negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for 
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former 
workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on August 20, 
2010 and the Notice of Determination was published in the Federal 
Register on September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor any of its 
customers imported articles like or directly competitive with uncoated 
freesheet containerboard produced by the subject firm nor did the 
subject firm shift production to a foreign country or acquire from 
another country articles like or directly competitive with the uncoated 
freesheet containerboard produced at the subject firm. The initial 
investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not produce a 
component part that was used by a firm that employed a worker group 
that is currently eligible to apply for TAA and that directly 
incorporated the containerboard in the production of the article that 
was the basis for the TAA certification.
    In request for reconsideration, the subject firm provided new 
information in regard to the product produced by the subject firm.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27383 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P