alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27401]

[[Page 66748]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2677-019]

City of Kaukauna, WI; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

October 22, 2010.
    On August 29, 2007, the City of Kaukauna, Wisconsin, licensee for 
the Badger-Rapide Croche Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application 
for a New License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. The Badger-Rapide Croche 
Hydroelectric Project is on the Fox River in Outagamie County, near the 
City of Kaukauna, Wisconsin.
    The license for Project No. 2677, as amended, ended on August 9, 
2010. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2677 is issued to 
the City of Kaukauna, Wisconsin for a period effective August 10, 2010 
through August 9, 2011, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If 
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on 
or before August 9, 2011, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that City of Kaukauna, Wisconsin, is authorized to 
continue operation of the Badger-Rapide Croche Hydroelectric Project, 
until such time as the Commission acts on its application for a 
subsequent license.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27401 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
#### Jones and Another *v.*Baum.—In error.

*Tuesday, June*4.

DEBT by the assignee of the payee of a sealed note for the payment of money against the makers. Pleas, 1. That the assignor obtained the note by fraud, covin, and misrepresentation, and without consideration; 2. That the note was given for horses. purchased from, the assignor, which he represented and asserted at the time of sale to be sound, but which were unsound; 3. That the assignor, before the assignment, released the defendants from the payment of the note, and that the release was lost or destroyed by accident. Special demurrer for duplicity to the first plea. To the second plea there was a demurrer, and to the third a replication denying the loss of the release. Demurrer to the replication.

*Held,*that the first plea was good, the statement as to want of consideration being mere surplusage. *Held,*also, that the *155second plea was bad; *House*v. *Fort,*4 Blackf. 293 ; and that the third plea and the replication to it were good. *Clark*v. *Faulkner,*1 Blackf. 218.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 
    1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
 Date: November 7, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: November 7, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Denis J. SalamoneDenis J. SalamoneSenior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Page 45
---

## Gary Neff



---



Gary Neff I've been a professional pilot since 1976. Since 1984, I've been flying for an airline based in the great Northwest. I'm  interested in all things Apollo, and I'm particularly interested in the machines  themselves, and how they were operated.

My interest in space exploration began, growing up in Indiana post Mercury, just in time  for Gemini. I was living in Winter Haven, Fl. in 1972, and my family was fortunate enough  to get a pass for the launch of Apollo 17. As others who have seen a Saturn V launch know, it's  an experience that you never forget. The early space program, and particularly Apollo, inspired me to make aviation my career, and I'm sure it will always hold my great interest.

December 2005
#### Tipton *v.*Cummins.—In error.

Thursday, *June*3.

THE amending of a declaration in debt by inserting the amount of damages claimed, does not entitle the defendant to a continuance.

The plaintiff cannot take a judgment by *nil dicit,*if the general issue be on file. *Harris*v. *The M. M. Co., 4*Blackf. 267.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Huttig Building Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas S. McHugh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas S. McHughThomas S. McHughChief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Huttig Building Products, Inc. and will be retained by Huttig Building Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Sitemap

## October 1981

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1981
- October 1981

            - 01
#### Frances C. PRATER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79-2527.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 19, 1980.

Thomas R. Burnside, Jr., Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

William T. Moore, Jr., U. S. Atty., Savannah, Ga., Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Anne S. Almy, James W. Moorman, Dept, of Justice, Appellate Sect., Land & Natural Resources Div., Attys., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Feb. 20, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 612 F.2d 157)

Before GODBOLD, REAVLEY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We granted rehearing to dispose of the government’s concern that our original opinion, *Prater v. United States,*612 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1980), expands the scope of the waiver of sovereign immunity for “quiet title” suits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a (1976) to actions seeking reformation of a deed. We did not characterize Prater’s suit as one in the nature of an action to reform a deed; that label was one affixed by the government. *Id.*at 159. The opinion clearly indicates that Prater asserted equitable title to the realty, under Georgia trust law, by virtue of Allen’s promise of reconveyance. Prater’s summary' judgment proof (the depositions of Fred Prater and Allen as well as Allen’s affidavit) was sufficient to establish the promise to reconvey, and thus raise a claim of equitable title for jurisdictional purposes. *See Land v. Dollar,*330 U.S. 731, 735 n.4, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 1010 n.4, 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947); C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1350 (1969). Because Prater claimed a right, title or interest in the property, section 2409a served as a waiver of sovereign immunity and the district court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case under 28 U.S.C. • § 1346(f) (1976).
Learn more about TESS

## Latest TESS News

Explore All TESS News

ArticleArticleArticle1 month agoArticle2 months agoArticle3 months agoKeep ExploringDiscover More Topics From NASA
Galaxies

Black Holes

Stars

Exoplanets
Return to topThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA- 
- 
- 
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IG
- Budget & Annual Reports
- Agency Financial Reports
- Contact NASA
- Accessibility
- Page Last Updated: 10 months ago
- Page Editor: SMD Content Editors
- Responsible NASA Official for Science: Dana Bolles
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6377-6378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. ER10-505-000]


Dynegy Services Plum Point; Notice of Filing

February 2, 2010.
    Take notice that, on February 1, 2010, Dynegy Services Plum Point 
filed to supplement its filing in the above captioned docket with 
information required under the Commission's regulations. Such filing 
served to reset the filing date in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a

[[Page 6378]]

document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a3c3f283935141613141f290f0a0a15080e3a1c1f0819541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2725 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27386]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,608]


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (``PwC'') Internal Firm Services 
Client Account Administrators Group, Charlotte, NC; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 1, 2010, applicable to workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP (``PwC''), Internal Firm Services (``IFS'') Group, Charlotte, North 
Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 
21, 2010 (75 FR 57515).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The IFS workers supply 
professional services and public accounting services.
    New information shows that the Department did not correctly state 
the subject firm name in its entirety on the certification decision. 
The correct name of the subject firm should read PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP (``PwC''), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators 
Group.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
correct the name of the subject firm to read PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
(``PwC''), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators Group.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,608 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (``PwC''), Internal 
Firm Services Client Account Administrator Group, Charlotte, North 
Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after February 26, 2009, through September 1, 2012, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27386 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDDIE DEAN FLUKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-31-A, CA-96-555-R)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Dean Fluker, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Fluker, Nos. CR-92-31-A; CA-96-555-R (W.D. Va.

Mar. 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1








Section 1350 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer




In connection with the quarterly report of Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
F. Bijou, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
report.








Date:      
      May 1, 2009
              /s/ Thomas F.
      Bijou
                Thomas
      F. Bijou
                Chief
      Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christian Soderquist certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OCTuS, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS Inc.





Date: August 23, 2010


/s/ Christian SoderquistChristian Soderquist

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1724

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel 
         assemblies for use in LCD projection type televisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel 
         assemblies for use in LCD projection type televisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LCD PANEL ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.24       LCD panel            Free       No change        No change        On or before 12/
                          assemblies for use                                                31/2006           ''
                          in LCD projection                                                                    .
                          type televisions
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9013.80.90).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILE AS PART OF
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,407
<INVENTORY>                                     90,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,686
<PP&E>                                         145,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           857
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,873
<SALES>                                         98,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,682
<CGS>                                           64,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (344)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    936
<INCOME-TAX>                                       379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       557
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08<F2>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED RESPECTIVELY.
<F2>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>