alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11


                        Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
           Computation of Net Loss and Pro Forma Net Loss Per Share





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Quarter            Quarter        Nine Months         Nine Months   
                                                         ending             ending            ending              ending     
                                                        09/30/96            9/30/95          09/30/96            9/30/95     
                                                    ---------------     -------------     --------------     --------------
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>               <C>                <C>
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding........................                    6,867,078           981,516          4,559,914            981,361

Net effect of dilutive common stock
   options and warrants pursuant to
   Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83...                            -            99,877                  -             99,877 

Assumed conversion of preferred stock
   from original date of issuance,
   pursuant to staff policy...........                            -         2,187,524            874,798          2,518,475

                                                    ---------------     -------------     --------------     --------------
   Total..............................                    6,867,078         3,268,917          5,434,711          3,599,712

   Net loss...........................              $    (3,046,867)    $  (2,472,277)    $  (11,202,964)    $   (8,793,743)
                                                    ===============     =============     ==============     ==============
   Net loss and pro forma net loss per              
   share..............................              $         (0.44)    $       (0.76)    $        (2.06)    $        (2.44)
                                                    ===============     =============     ==============     ==============
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements listed below, of our reports dated February 8, 2002 with respect to
the financial statements and schedule of Cysive, Inc., included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

1) Form S-8 No. 333-75966
2) Form S-8 No. 333-35374
3) Form S-8 No. 333-35372

|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 12, 2002

4
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Cascade Designs, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62378-ADR

)

Under Contract No. W911QY-17-D-0246 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: William A. Shook, Esq.

 The Law Offices of William A. Shook PLLC

 Seattle, WA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Jill B. Wiley, JA

MAJ Nhu Thi To Tran, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 28, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62378-ADR, Appeal of Cascade 

Designs, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 31, 2022

LAURA EYESTER

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000891983
<NAME> MUZAK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470
<INVENTORY>                                      3,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,606
<PP&E>                                          75,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,947
<BONDS>                                        100,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,243
<SALES>                                         10,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,098
<CGS>                                            8,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

TOMAS ALVARADO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 301 99

D.C. No. 1:13

- cr

- 00026

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016 **

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Tomas Alvarado appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisd iction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alvarado contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 1 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 30199

motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing

Guidelines. T he district court acted within its discretion when it denied Alvarado

a sentence reduction based on his undisputed ties with an international drug cartel

,

his extensive cr iminal history, and his post

- offense conduct

. See U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.10 cmt. n. 1(B); United States v. Lightfoot , 626 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir.

2010)

.

AFFIRMED.
A04A1032.

#### SMITH v. THE STATE.

(602 SE2d 839)

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

On October 31, 1996, Roy Smith pleaded guilty to one count of child molestation. The trial court sentenced him to 20 years, with 16 *749to serve in prison. On August 15, 2003, almost seven years later, Smith filed an extraordinary motion for new trial. The trial court, noting that there had been no trial, considered the motion as one to withdraw Smith’s plea and denied the motion. Smith then filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, or, in the alternative, a motion to reconsider. The trial court denied Smith’s motion, finding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion because it was filed after the term of court in which Smith was convicted and sentenced. It is from this order that Smith now appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Decided July 27, 2004.

Roy Smith, *pro se.*

*Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney,*for appellee.

It is well established that “[t]he superior court’s jurisdiction to entertain a motion to withdraw a guilty plea ends after the term of court in which the judgment of conviction was rendered.”1 However, this jurisdictional bar applies only to the extent that Smith seeks to withdraw his guilty plea; “[t]here is no jurisdictional bar to a superior court entertaining a motion for an out-of-time appeal.”2 Accordingly, given that Smith cast his motion as one for an out-of-time appeal or, in the alternative, a motion to reconsider, the trial court’s denial of Smith’s motion based on lack of jurisdiction is incorrect.

Nonetheless, the trial court properly denied the motion. “[A]n out-of-time appeal is occasionally appropriate where, due to ineffective assistance of counsel, no appeal has been taken. But an appeal will lie from a judgment entered on a guilty plea only if the issue on appeal can be resolved by facts appearing in the record.”3 Here, Smith has made no showing that the issues raised by him could be resolved by facts appearing in the record, nor does he even argue that his right to appeal was in any way frustrated by ineffective assistance of counsel. It follows, based on a right for any reason analysis, that the trial court did not err in denying Smith’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm.4

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eldridge and Adams, JJ., concur.*

1

 (Punctuation omitted.) *Foskey v. State,*232 Ga. App. 303 (501 SE2d 856) (1998).

2

*Pitts v. State,*265 Ga. App. 633 (2) (595 SE2d 322) (2004).

3

 (Footnote and punctuation omitted.) Id.

4

 In light of our opinion, Smith’s motion to supplement the record and motion for supersedeas are hereby denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Marvin Tancer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Marvin Tancer                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | Marvin Tancer Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
# Orbital sunset photographed by Astronaut John Glenn during MA-6 flight

S62-06040 (20 Feb. 1962) --- Orbital sunset photographed by astronaut John H. Glenn Jr. aboard the "Friendship 7" during his Mercury-Atlas 6 (MA-6) spaceflight. Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s62-06040/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- NASA History
- Project Mercury
TakenFebruary 20, 1962ProducerJSCSize1919x1381pxPIA Numbers62-06040The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 23, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michele Ostovar								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Astronaut Ricky Arnold

"And here we are twenty years later, and now we have a whole generation of kids that have never known a day humans haven’t been living and working in space and working together as a global community. I think it’s a wonderful anniversary to celebrate." — Ricky Arnold, Astronaut, Michoud Assembly Facility

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/astronaut-ricky-arnold/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x694pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 16, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-42]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: October 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-27072 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP





EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc. as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII,


A Limited Partnership








Date:      August 16, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COSMAIR, INC. v. DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION.

May 12, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry
A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Larry A. Goldstone

Larry A. Goldstone
President and Chief Operating Officer
May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. and will be retained by Thornburg Mortgage,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Research Physical Scientist Tra-My Justine Richardson

"It takes a lot of courage to confront your fears and failures. Each and every time is really difficult, but you will feel really empowered. It’s a very significant step in your life if you can do that.”

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/enviromental-portrait-of-justine-richardson/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenNovember 20, 2023Image CreditNASA / Brandon TorresSize4000x2667pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Dec 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Monika Luabeya								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1081

DANIEL AKIYOYOVBI OGHENOCHUKO, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-429-494) Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: November 1, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Roberts, LAW OFFICES OF JAMES A. ROBERTS, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Bryan S. Beier, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* While we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s denial of Oghenochuko’s motion to reopen because he did not petition for review of that order within thirty days, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2000), we find that we have jurisdiction to review the Board’s order denying the motion to reconsider. See8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(6) (2000); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 393 (1995) (concluding that when “amending the [Immigration and Nationality Act] Congress chose to depart from the ordinary judicial treatment of agency orders under reconsideration”). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Akiyoyovbi Oghenochuko, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. * We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED