alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000892020
<NAME> VIDEOLABS INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         605,428
<SECURITIES>                                   158,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,065,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,543
<INVENTORY>                                  3,459,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,550,348
<PP&E>                                       1,668,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 829,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,574,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,633,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,755
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,574,646
<SALES>                                      4,276,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,276,564
<CGS>                                        2,376,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,534,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   356,095
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          613,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    151,000
<COMMON>                                    21,966,577
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,731,031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,652)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=941
2 min read

# More Pieces of the X-59 are Coming Together

### NASA

Jun 15, 2020

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

The wing and cockpit sections of NASA’s X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) are coming together at Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works® factory in Palmdale, California. Major structural components still to be added include the long, forward nose and rear section – known as the empennage – that includes the tail and single jet engine. Nearby, although not seen in this picture, Lockheed Martin technicians and engineers are completing other assembly tasks, with fabricating the composite wing skins with the help of a sophisticated robot already done.

When complete, Lockheed Martin and NASA will put the X-59 through a series of ground and test flights to ensure not only its air worthiness, but also its ability to create a sonic boom that can barely be heard – if at all – by people on the ground while it flies supersonic at a cruise altitude overhead.

The X-59 will then be flown over select communities in the United States – still to be chosen – so residents can help provide information to NASA about their reaction to the sound of the sonic “thump.” This scientifically gathered data will be presented to regulators with the hope they will change rules that currently prohibit commercial supersonic air travel over land.

***Image credit: Lockheed Martin / Garry Tice***

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

4 min readNASA Announces New System to Aid Disaster Response
In early May, widespread flooding and landslides occurred in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande…
Article										3 days ago									

3 min readNASA’s RASC-AL Competition Selects 2024 Winners  Article										3 days ago									

2 min readNASA Supports California Students Aiming to Advance TechnologyArticle										4 days ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space
Solar System Exploration
Why Oceans Matter The story of oceans is the story of life. Life as we know it requires three ingredients:…

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - Advanced Air Vehicles Program
                - Aeronautics
                - Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
                - Armstrong Flight Research Center
                - Commercial Supersonic Technology
                - Integrated Aviation Systems Program
                - Langley Research Center
                - Low Boom Flight Demonstrator
                - Quesst (X-59)
                - Quesst: The Flights
                - Quesst: The Mission
                - Quesst: The Science
                - Quesst: The Team
                - Quesst: The Vehicle
                - Supersonic Flight
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0964

_____________________________

ANTONIO MILLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

February 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Stacy A. Scott, Public Defender, and Susan Ward, Assistant Public 

Defender, Starke, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements contained in
the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q of MUZAK
CAPITAL CORPORATION and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<CIK> 0001013763
<NAME> MUZAK CAPITAL CORPORATION
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,963-01
EX P ARTE HOKE H. EB ERHARDT, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 12-05-05302-C R IN THE 221 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM MONTG OMERY COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Art icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (T ex . C ri m. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted one count of ag grava ted assault ag ainst a public serva nt and one count of ag gravated robber y . He was sentenc ed to thirty and fifty year s’ imprisonment, respec tively
. Applicant contends that his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use she failed to timely file a motion for ne w trial or noticeof appe al. The trial court has deter

mined that Appl i ca n t was denied the right to appea l his sentenc es through no fault of his own. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-2

time appea l of the judgments of conviction in Cause No. 12-05-05302- CR from the 221 District st Cou rt o f M ontgome ry County
. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a mean i n g ful appea l. Within ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indigen t and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. Al l t i m e l i m its shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file
a written notice of a

ppeal in the tria l court within 30 day s after the mandateof this Court issues. Copies of this o pinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: August 21, 2013 Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-51084

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

v.

CHADRICK WATERS, also known as Chadrick Damon Waters,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-331-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Chadrick Waters has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Waters has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow 

us to make a fair evaluation of Waters’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 17, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-51084 Document: 00514242610 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2017
No. 16-51084

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Waters’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Our review reveals a clerical error in the judgment, which fails to reflect 

the dismissal of certain counts of the indictment and superseding indictment. 

The record shows that Waters was convicted and sentenced on Count Four of 

the superseding indictment and that the remaining counts were dismissed. 

The amended judgment should therefore reflect that the remaining counts 

were dismissed on the Government’s motion. See United States v. Powell, 354 

F.3d 362, 371-72 (5th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Waters’s motion to appoint new counsel is 

DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 

The case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error 

in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

 Case: 16-51084 Document: 00514242610 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2017
#### Henderson *v.*The State.—In error.

*Wednesday, November*21.

*SCIRE FACIAS*against bail on a recognizance conditioned for the principal’s appearance, at the next term of the Circuit Court, to answer the state on a charge of forgery, abide the order of the Court, and not depart without leave. Breach, that the bail being called and required, in discharge of his recognizance, to bring the principal into Court, made default. *Held,*that the *scire facias*was defective because it did not show any default of the principal. *The State*v. *Humphries,*4 Blackf. 538(1).

(1)

 The same point was decided, at the present term, in the case of *Tingley et al.*v. *The State.*
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00143

- CV

Steven W. Hughes and Adrienne R. Hughes , Appellant s

v.

21st Mortgage Corporation , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM CO UNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgmen t sig ned by the tr i a l court on February 24, 2021

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

a

ppellant s are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
# STS-26 crewmembers in Hawaiian shirts and sunglasses pose for group portrait

STS026-09-008 (3 Oct 1988) --- STS-26 crewmembers wear Hawaiian attire (brightly colored shirts with bold prints) and sunglasses while giving the "thumbs up" signal as they pay tribute to the Hawaii tracking station during an unscheduled television (TV) downlink. On Discovery's, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103's, middeck are (left to right) Mission Specialist (MS) John M. Lounge, holding onto open airlock hatch, MS David C. Hilmers, wearing red shirt, Commander Frederick H. Hauck, wearing white shirt and positioned in center of crew, MS George D. Nelson, and Pilot Richard O. Covey (lower right corner of the frame). The shirts were given to the crewmembers by the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Loud and Proud Team.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s26-09-008/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenOctober 2, 1988ProducerJSCSize1920x1267pxPIA Numbers26-09-008The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Corps of Engineers issues construction Notice to Proceed for COVID-19 Alternate Care Facility

The entire team gathers in a socially distanced circle to introduce themselves to one another before beginning the tour. The tour aimed to familiarize the Tennessee Deputy Commissioner for General Services John Hull with the building the state is going to lease. USACE will construct and convert it into an Alternate Care Facility now that the lease is signed and a “Notice to Proceed” has been issued. (USACE photo by Jessica Haas)

**Memphis, Tenn. -- **
**MEMPHIS, Tenn., April 16, 2020 –** Working at the direction of the State of Tennessee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Memphis District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a “Notice to Proceed” for the conversion of the former Commercial Appeal building today, located at 495 Union Ave. in Memphis to a COVID-19 Alternate Care Facility (ACF). The overall contract was awarded to AECOM Technical Services of Los Angeles, California.

Officials expect to use the facility to treat non-acute patients suffering from the COVID-19 virus. One of the main factors influencing selection of this site was its close proximity to other hospitals where patients could be quickly transferred for more intensive care if necessary.

“Our teams evaluated a number of locations at the request of the state and provided an assessment of what it would take to construct the facility wanted,” Memphis District Commander Col. Zachary Miller said. “We are expecting the contractor to be onsite and begin construction very soon.”

This is a FEMA funded project in support of the State of Tennessee which is managing the health care response for their citizens. The state identified the site and will manage it. The Memphis District received the final go-ahead and funding from FEMA after the state submitted the request for construction and FEMA evaluated their plan to staff and operate the site. 

FEMA will continue to work with the state to ensure they have the medical equipment and staff support to manage the ACF. FEMA coordinates and manages the completion of all Alternate Care Facilities throughout the country.

*Due to the inherent dangers present at any construction site, guidelines for media access to this location are still being determined. Additional caution will also be required in order to minimize risks associated with the potential spread of the COVID-19 virus. Once finalized, the Memphis District will release this guidance to the media.*

 

**Contact**

Release no. 20-035

COVID19

Alternate-Care-Sites

Alternate Care Facilities

Alternate Care Sites

COVID-19

Tennessee

Memphis District

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Memphis District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

AECOM Technical Services

Notice to Proceed

State of Tennessee

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Jim Pogue
# Expedition 62 Flight Engineer Jessica Meir poses for a portrait

iss062e116087 (March 29, 2020) --- NASA astronaut and Expedition 62 Flight Engineer Jessica Meir poses for a portrait in the weightless environment of the International Space Station.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/expedition-62-flight-engineer-jessica-meir-poses-for-a-portrait-49727612843-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
TakenMarch 29, 2020Image CreditNASASize5568x3712pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Feb 14, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Abby Graf								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment to the September 17, 1999 Employment Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”) between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and Douglas Krause (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 4th day of March, 2020 by and between Company and Employee.


The following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified: 


		
	1.
	Section 3.1 (Term) of the Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows:  This Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate on March 4, 2023 unless extended by Company. 




		
	2.
	Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.






	
		
	 
	EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

	 
	/s/ GARY TEO

	 
	Gary Teo

	 
	Head of Human Resources

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE

	 
	Employee: Douglas P. Krause