alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CONTINUED ACTION ON TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT, INC., Appellant, v. Brock ADAMS, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, Harold C. King, Virginia State Highway Commissioner, and Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, Appellees.

No. 79-1343.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 10, 1980.

Decided April 11, 1980.

Richard E. Crouch, Arlington, Va. (David R. Rosenfeld, Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellant.

David C. Shilton, Washington, D. C., Walter A. McFarlane, Deputy Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va. (Marshall Coleman, Atty. Gen., John J. Beall, Jr., D. Brian Costello, John M. McCarthy, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. At*1079tys. Gen., Richmond, Va., James W. Moor-man, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert L. Klarquist and Judith Welch Wegner, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellees.

Before BUTZNER and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT J. STAKER, United States District Judge for the Southern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Continued Action on Transportation and Environment, Inc., a Virginia citizens’ group, appeals from an adverse judgment of the district court on its request for an injunction and other equitable relief designed to stop alleged illegal construction of, Highway 1-66.

The complaint alleged several causes of action based on various contracts, federal law, and constitutional provisions. Underlying all of these allegations is the claim that 1-66 is being constructed in violation of the special restrictions imposed by the Secretary of Transportation in the administrative proceedings required by *Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. Volpe,*458 F.2d 1323 (4th Cir. 1972).1 After an extensive evidentiary hearing, the district court found that the highway was being constructed in accordance with the Secretary’s decision.2

The court’s factual findings are amply supported by the record, and its conclusions reflect a correct understanding of the law. We find no cause for reversal in the numerous assignments of error.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. See *also District of Columbia Federation of Civic Associations v.*Adams, 571 F.2d 1310 (4th Cir. 1978).

2

. The Secretary’s Decision on Interstate Highway 66, Fairfax and Arlington Counties, Virginia, at 8, 9, 58 (Jan. 5. 1977), contained eight conditions. At issue in this case are the following:

> Not construct any highway lanes in the 1-66 right-of-way beyond the four which I am now approving;

> Include the design elements and other features intended to minimize and compensate for adverse social and environmental impacts of the highway as set forth in the Final Four Lane Supplemental EIS, and this document, including specifically those set forth in Section V of this document (in other words, so far as possible, construction should be similar to the George Washington Parkway);

> ******

> The highway has been reduced from eight lanes, as originally proposed, to four lanes. The highway will be designed so that all bridges and overpasses will accommodate four lanes of traffic, and “no provision is included that would facilitate future widening” of the roadway.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 24, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE AGENCY, et al.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-1490

(D.C. No.1:09-CV-02130-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1 and 3.3(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1490 Document: 01018390102 Date Filed: 03/24/2010 Page: 1
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to May 19, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-19-825 Erpelding v. Southall

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40576 Summary Calendar

DEWAYNE RAY CLUBB , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
JEFFERSON COUNTY, Texas; JEFF BRANICK, Judge, Jefferson County, Texas; MITCH WOODS, Sheriff's Office, Jefferson County, Texas; BOB WORTHAM, District Attorney's Office, Jefferson County, Texas; RACHEL GROVE, District Attorney's Office, Jefferson County, Texas , Def endant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CV

- 84

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dewayne Ray Clubb, a former Texas prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil suit as frivolous. In his complaint, Clubb alleged that he was not advised of his rights upon arrest, that his repeated

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 16, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40576 Document: 00514389589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2018No. 17

- 40576

2 requests for medication and counsel were ignored, and that he was bullied into pleading guilty without understanding the effect of his plea

. This court reviews the dismissal of a frivolous complaint for abuse of
discretion. Rogers v. Boatright , 709 F.3d 403, 407 (5th Cir. 2013). In his brief, Clubb reasserts the fac ts supporting his claims but fails to make any reference to the district court’s reasons for dismissing the m . Because Clubb offers no basis to disagree with the district court’s analysis, any challenge to that ruling is deemed abandoned on appeal. See Br inkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff
Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 17-40576 Document: 00514389589 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2018
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 23, 2012

t0516 

# Order

May 23, 2012

144253

WILLIAM P. RAMEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144253 COA: 303953 WCAC: 10-000040 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICKEY LEE JAMES.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
- Home
- Overview
- Balloon Types
- Launch Locations
- Glossary
- FAQ
- Media Resources

# 							Balloon Launch Locations						

						There are a number of factors that determine the selection of balloon launch locations. Among those are mission duration, need for flights over low-population areas for safety reasons, the science to be collected during the mission, cost, wind speed and direction, and many more.					

## Launch Locations

There are a number of factors that determine the selection of balloon launch locations. Among those are mission duration, need for flights over low-population areas for safety reasons, the science to be collected during the mission, cost, wind speed and direction, and many more.

### Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility, Texas

Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility, Palestine, is located just west of the Palestine Municipal Airport. The site encompasses about 192 hectares (474 acres) consisting of open and forested lands, two balloon launch pads, and several permanent buildings; the land and facilities are owned by NASA.

Read More

### Fort Sumner, New Mexico

Fort Sumner is located at the Fort Sumner Municipal Airport in New Mexico. Fort Sumner consists of a large World War II hangar (used for equipment and launch vehicle storage, as well as science payload storage and integration), a NASA payload processing facility that includes offices and an operations control center, and a launch pad.

Read More

### McMurdo Station, Antarctic 

Launches are conducted from Long Duration Balloon launch pad, located about eight miles from McMurdo Station on the Ross Ice Shelf. ince 1996, the launch site has been operated exclusively as a field camp to support scientific balloon operations.

Read More

### Esrange, Sweden

Kiruna, Sweden (Esrange) is located about 67.86 degrees north latitude and 21.08 degrees east longitude. Launch operations are normally conducted between May 15 and July 10 of each year. 

Read More

### Alice Springs, Australia

Alice Springs, Australia is located about 23.82 degrees south latitude and 133.88 degrees west longitude. Launch operations are normally conducted between Nov. 1 (flight ready by Dec. 1) and Jan. 20 of each year. 

Read More

### Wanaka, New Zealand

Wanaka, New Zealand is located about -44.72 degrees south latitude and 169.24 degrees west longitude. Launch operations are currently conducted between February 15 (flight ready by April 1) and April 30 of each year.

Read More

## Discover More From Wallops

Scientific Balloons

Wallops Range

Goddard Space Flight Center

Wallops Flight Facility
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Andre M. Hilliou, Chief Executive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 19, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    ANDRE M. HILLIOU
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Andre M. Hilliou       
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, James Meier, Chief Financial Officer of Full House Resorts,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 19, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES MEIER
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | James Meier            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 19, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer), P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Woolfam VI SLB, LLC, Maryland Heights, Missouri; to become a 
bank holding company by controlling 32.5 percent of the voting shares 
of St. Louis Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of St. Louis Bank, both of Town and Country, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 21, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-27013 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,801
<SECURITIES>                                    10,057
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,784
<INVENTORY>                                        411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,908
<PP&E>                                          21,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,996
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,215
<SALES>                                          5,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,860
<CGS>                                              776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. 1350**

|   | (1) | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                  report. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |                                                                                                                         |                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date:                April                4, 2007  |                                                                                                                              | /s/                B. S. P. Marra |
|                                                    | B.                S. P. Marra  Chief                Financial Officer (Principal Financial                Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 388

Congratulating and honoring Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory on 50 
                  years of groundbreaking discoveries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2017

   Mr. Hultgren (for himself and Mr. Foster) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
                               Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating and honoring Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory on 50 
                  years of groundbreaking discoveries.

Whereas, in 2017, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (referred to in this 
        preamble as ``Fermilab'') celebrates the 50th anniversary of the date on 
        which the first employees of Fermilab started work in Illinois, June 15, 
        1967;
Whereas Fermilab drives scientific discovery by building and operating world-
        leading particle accelerator and detector facilities, performing 
        pioneering research with national and global partners, and developing 
        new technologies for science that support the industrial competitiveness 
        of the United States;
Whereas Fermilab provides research facilities for 4,500 scientists from 50 
        countries;
Whereas research at Fermilab led to the discovery of the 3 building blocks of 
        the universe, the bottom quark in 1977, the top quark in 1995, and the 
        tau neutrino in 2000;
Whereas superconducting magnets developed at Fermilab led to the advancement of 
        magnetic resonance imaging medical diagnostics;
Whereas Fermilab contributed critical components, computing capabilities, and 
        scientific expertise to the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson in Geneva, 
        Switzerland;
Whereas Fermilab continues to lead scientific discoveries, including planning 
        construction for the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility to power the Deep 
        Underground Neutrino Experiment; and
Whereas Fermilab demonstrates its strong commitment to developing a diverse 
        workforce for the future in the fields of science, technology, 
        engineering, and mathematics through educational programs that bring 
        more than 15,000 K-12 students to visit Fermilab each year: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates and honors the Fermi National Accelerator 
        Laboratory on the semicentennial of the Laboratory; and
            (2) wishes the Laboratory success in continuing to help the 
        people of the United States understand the mysteries of matter, 
        energy, space, and time.
                                 <all>
```
# View of Chile taken by the STS-109 crew

STS109-E-5887 (9 March 2002) --- This view of a good portion of the country of Chile was recorded with a digital still camera by one of the STS-109 astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia. Chile's Pacific Coast is featured and the country's borders with three other nations--Bolivia, Peru and Argentina--almost or just barely made it into the frame in three different directions.  Punta Angamos and Punta Tetas are readily visible on the anvil shaped peninsular feature, near the city of Antofagasta.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s109e5887/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMarch 9, 2002ProducerJSCSize1920x1307pxPIA NumberS109E5887The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 03, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman