Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices 73691 

information on using http:// 

www.regulations.gov to access the 

docket, click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab at the 

top of the Home page. Contact the 

OSHA Docket Office for information 

about materials not available through 

that Web page and for assistance in 

using the Internet to locate submissions 

and other documents in the public 

docket. 

Electronic copies of this Federal 

Register notice are available at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. This notice, as 

well as news releases and other relevant 

information, also are available on the 

OSHA Web page at http:// 

www.osha.gov. 

Authority and Signature 

David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for 

Occupational Safety and Health, 

directed the preparation of this notice 

under the authority granted by Section 

7 of the Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970 (U.S.C. 656), the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 

2); 29 CFR part 1912a; 41 CFR part 102– 

3; and Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 4– 

2010 (75 FR 55355, 9/10/2010). 

Signed at Washington, DC, on November 

22, 2011. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30565 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION 

BOARD 

Oral Argument 

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection 

Board. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

scheduling of oral argument in the 

matters of: James C. Latham v. U.S. 

Postal Service, MSPB Docket Number 

DA–0353–10–0408–I–1; Ruby N. Turner 

v. U.S. Postal Service, MSPB Docket 

Number SF–0353–10–0329–I–1; 

Arleather Reaves v. U.S. Postal Service, 

MSPB Docket Number CH–0353–10– 

0823–I–1; Cynthia E. Lundy v. U.S. 

Postal Service; MSPB Docket Number 

AT–0353–11–0369–I–1; and Marcella 

Albright v. U.S. Postal Service, MSPB 

Docket Number DC–0752–11–0196–I–1. 

Date and Time: Tuesday, December 

13, 2011, at 10 a.m. 

Place: The United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Room 

201, 717 Madison Place, NW., 

Washington DC. 

Status: Open. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Shannon, Merit Systems 

Protection Board, Office of the Clerk of 

the Board, 1615 M Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20419; (202) 254–4477 

or (202) 653–7200; mspb@mspb.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1201.117(a)(2), the Merit 

Systems Protection Board (‘‘MSPB’’ or 

‘‘Board’’) will hear oral argument in the 

matters of James C. Latham v. U.S. 

Postal Service, MSPB Docket Number 

DA–0353–10–0408–I–1; Ruby N. Turner 

v. U.S. Postal Service; MSPB Docket 

Number SF–0353–10–0329–I–1; 

Arleather Reaves v. U.S. Postal Service, 

MSPB Docket Number CH–0353–10– 

0823–I–1; Cynthia E. Lundy v. U.S. 

Postal Service; MSPB Docket Number 

AT–0353–11–0369–I–1; and Marcella 

Albright v. U.S. Postal Service, MSPB 

Docket Number DC–0752–11–0196–I–1. 

Latham, et al. raise the following legal 

issues: (1) May a denial of restoration be 

‘‘arbitrary and capricious’’ within the 

meaning of 5 CFR 353.304(c) solely for 

being in violation of the agency’s own 

internal rules; and (2) what is the extent 

of the agency’s restoration obligation 

under its own internal rules, i.e., under 

what circumstances do the agency’s 

rules require it to offer a given task to 

a given partially recovered employee as 

modified work? The Board requested 

and received an advisory opinion from 

the Office of Personnel Management 

(OPM) in this matter, see 5 U.S.C. 

1204(e)(1)(A), and the Board invited 

amicus curiae to submit briefs. See 76 

FR 44373, July 25, 2011. The Board also 

has invited OPM and the amici curiae 

to present oral argument along with the 

parties. The briefs submitted by the 

parties, OPM, and the amici curiae are 

available for viewing on MSPB’s Web 

site at http://www.mspb.gov/ 

oralarguments/. A recording of the oral 

argument will also be made available on 

the Web site. The public is welcome to 

attend this hearing for the sole purpose 

of observation. Persons with disabilities 

who require reasonable accommodation 

to participate in this event should direct 

the request to MSPB’s Director of Equal 

Employment Opportunity at (202) 254– 

4405 and V/TDD users should call via 

relay. All requests should be made at 

least one week in advance. 

William D. Spencer, 

Clerk of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30659 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7400–01–P 

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE 

CORPORATION 

[MCC FR 11–12] 

Notice of Entering Into a Compact With 

the Republic of Indonesia 

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

610(b)(2) of the Millennium Challenge 

Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108–199, Division 

D), the Millennium Challenge 

Corporation (MCC) is publishing a 

summary and the complete text of the 

Millennium Challenge Compact 

between the United States of America, 

acting through the Millennium 

Challenge Corporation, and the 

Republic of Indonesia. Representatives 

of the United States Government and 

the Republic of Indonesia executed the 

Compact documents on November 19, 

2011. 

Dated: November 23, 2011. 

Melvin F. Williams, Jr., 

VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, 

Millennium Challenge Corporation. 

Summary of Millennium Challenge 

Compact With the Republic of 

Indonesia 

The five-year, $600 million compact 

with the Government of Indonesia (the 

‘‘GOI’’) is aimed at reducing poverty 

through economic growth (the 

‘‘Compact’’). To this end, the Compact’s 

three projects are intended to increase 

incomes of households in project areas 

through increased productivity of labor 

and enterprises, reduced household 

energy costs, and improved provision of 

growth-enhancing goods and services by 

the public sector. 

1. Project Overview and Activity 

Descriptions 

To advance the Compact goal of 

reducing poverty through economic 

growth, the Compact will fund three 

projects. The Green Prosperity Project 

aims to (i) increase productivity and 

reduce reliance on fossil fuels by 

expanding renewable energy; and (ii) 

increase productivity by improving land 

use practices and management of 

natural resources. These objectives are 

consistent with GOI development plans 

to support low carbon economic 

development and the protection of 

natural capital leading to increased 

household incomes in project areas. The 

Community-Based Health and Nutrition 

to Reduce Stunting Project aims to 

reduce and prevent low birth weight, 

childhood stunting, and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES