alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892038
<NAME>                        DIGITAL PRIVACY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         41,352
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  40,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    51,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,037
<PP&E>                                         61,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 650,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,509
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       39,711
<OTHER-SE>                                     (513,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   650,158
<SALES>                                        97,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               97,676
<CGS>                                          2,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               910,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             45,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (861,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (861,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (861,277)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.23)



</TABLE>
#### Mason *v.*Roe, on the Demise of Woods.

Wednesday, *May 22.*

The claimant of real estáte under a sale for taxes, must show that the taxes had been legally assessed.

APPEAL from the *Fayette*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Ejectment against *Mason*for a lot of ground in *Connersville.*Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to the Court, and a judgment rendered for the plaintiff below.

The plaintiff’s lessor exhibited a title derived from the proprietor of the town.

The defendant relied alone upon a title under a sale of the lot for county taxes assessed for the year 1831. He failed to prove, that the board doing county business had fixed the amount which should be collected on the value of town lots in that year ; and the question, whether proof of such an act of the board was essential to the defendant’s title, is the only one in the cause necessary for us to examine.

We see no difficulty in' this case. The assessment was made under the statute of 1825. By that statute, it was the duty of the board doing county business, to determine the amount of the tax to be collected on town lots for county purposes. Stat. 1825, p. 68. The board had the exclusive authority to determine the amount of the tax ; and unless they did determine it, there was no legal tax on the lot in dispute to be collected. •

The defendant, therefore, failed to prove'any legal claim to the lot.

• The plaintiff showed a sufficient title, and the judgment in his favour is correct.

*99/. Perry, for the appellant.

*G.*Holland, for the appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
#### Tripp *v.*Elliott and Others.

*Saturday, November*16.

The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in any case which originated before a justice of the peace, unless the amount in controversy in the Supreme Court is at least twenty dollars, exclusive of interest and costs.

And though the amount so in controversy be more than twenty dollars, still if that amount inclusive of interest and costs be under fifty dollars, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction unless a supersedeas be granted.

APPEAL from the *Warren*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

*Elliott*and others sued *Tripp*in assumpsit before a justice of the peace, and were nonsuited. They *169appealed to the Circuit Court, and obtained a judgment for twelve dollars together with costs. The defendant appealed to this Court; and the appeal has been dismissed this term for want of jurisdiction. Petition by the appellant for a rehearing.

*R. A.*Chandler, for the appellant.

D. *Mace,*for the appellees.

We have no jurisdiction in any case which originated before a justice, unless the amount in controversy, in this Court, is at least twenty dollars *exclusive*of interest and costs. And though the amount so in controversy be more than twenty dollars, still if that amount *inclusive*of interest and costs be under fifty dollars, we have no jurisdiction unless a supersedeas be granted. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 202.

The amount in controversy in this case, *exclusive*of interest and costs, is only twelve dollars; and the appeal was, therefore, correctly dismissed.

*Per Curiam.*

The petition is overruled.
# Spacewalkers Thomas Jones and Robert Curbeam in the cargo bay of the Space Shuttle Atlantis

ISS01-E-5361 (14 February 2001) --- Astronauts Thomas D. Jones (red stripes on suit) and Robert L. Curbeam, STS-98 mission specialists, are pictured in the cargo bay of the Space Shuttle Atlantis during their third space walk, as photographed with a digital still camera from the International Space Station's new Destiny laboratory.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss01e5361-9474343352-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize3060x2092pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Garrett Thornburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Garrett Thornburg  
|Garrett Thornburg      
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 8, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XZ32

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of vendor to provide fishing year 2011 cage tags.

# SUMMARY:

NMFS informs surfclam and ocean quahog individual transferable quota (ITQ) allocation holders that they will be required to purchase their fishing year 2011 cage tags from the National Band and Tag Company. The intent of this notice is to comply with regulations for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries and to promote efficient distribution of cage tags.

# ADDRESSES:

Written inquiries may be sent to: Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anna Macan, Fishery Management Specialist, (978) 281-9165; fax (978) 281-9135.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fishery regulations at 50 CFR 648.75(b) authorize the Regional Administrator of the Northeast Region, NMFS, to specify in the                     **Federal Register**                     a vendor from whom cage tags, required under the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan (FMP), shall be purchased. Notice is hereby given that National Band and Tag Company of Newport, Kentucky, is the authorized vendor of cage tags required for the fishing year 2011 Federal surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. Detailed instructions for purchasing these cage tags will be provided in a letter to ITQ allocation holders in these fisheries from NMFS within the next several weeks.                

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

      ( print page 65453)    
Dated: October 20, 2010.

Carrie Selberg,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-26938 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
EXHIBIT 11.2

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Six Months Ended                Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,                        March 31,
                                                   1997             1996             1997             1996
                                               -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>        
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                            13,234,930       11,341,864       13,579,433       11,391,780
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
  Stock Options                                    564,196          557,504          549,634          547,174
  Warrants                                            --             49,044             --             44,590
  Preferred Stock                                     --          1,000,000             --          1,000,000
                                               -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares                         13,799,126       12,948,412       14,129,067       12,983,544
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
    outstanding
Net Income                                     $ 4,005,165      $ 2,017,672        2,437,032        1,139,897
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========


Fully Diluted Earnings
    Per Share                                  $      0.29      $      0.16      $      0.17      $      0.09
                                               ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
     All share amounts and per share data have been restated to reflect the
     two-for-one stock split effected as a stock dividend on May 28, 1996.
                                       17
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Caspian Services, Inc., on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the transition period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), the undersigned, John Baile, Chief Financial Officer of Caspian Services, Inc. certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

 (1) The amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2) The information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| Date:  January 29, 2007 | /s/ John Baile                          |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    | John Baile, Principal Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,306
<SECURITIES>                                    16,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,189)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,217
<PP&E>                                          36,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (26,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,709
<OTHER-SE>                                     (44,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,820
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,505
<CGS>                                            4,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (580)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                       323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN RE: R.J.V., JR., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: R.J.V., SR., FATHER 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 935 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1747

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 

regulation of all contact lenses as medical devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

provide for the regulation of all contact lenses as medical 

devices, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) All contact lenses have significant effects on 

6 the eye and pose serious potential health risks if im7 properly manufactured or used without appropriate 

8 involvement of a qualified eye care professional. 
2

•S 1747 IS 

1 (2) Most contact lenses currently marketed in 

2 the United States, including certain plano and deco3 rative contact lenses, have been approved as medical 

4 devices pursuant to premarket approval applications 

5 or cleared pursuant to premarket notifications by 

6 the Food and Drug Administration (‘‘FDA’’). 

7 (3) FDA has asserted medical device jurisdic8 tion over most corrective and noncorrective contact 

9 lenses as medical devices currently marketed in the 

10 United States, including certain plano and decora11 tive contact lenses, so as to require approval pursu12 ant to premarket approval applications or clearance 

13 pursuant to premarket notifications. 

14 (4) All contact lenses can present risks if used 

15 without the supervision of a qualified eye care pro16 fessional. Eye injuries in children and other con17 sumers have been reported for contact lenses that 

18 are regulated by FDA as medical devices primarily 

19 when used without professional involvement, and 

20 noncorrective contact lenses sold without approval or 

21 clearance as medical devices have caused eye injuries 

22 in children. 
3

•S 1747 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF CERTAIN ARTICLES AS MEDICAL 

2 DEVICES. 

3 Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 360j) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following subsection: 

6 ‘‘Regulation of Contact Lens as Devices 

7 ‘‘(n)(1) All contact lenses shall be deemed to be de8 vices under section 201(h). 

9 ‘‘(2) Paragraph 1 shall not be construed as having 

10 any legal effect on any article that is not described in that 

11 paragraph.’’.

Æ
#### PERINI CORPORATION v. GREATE BAY HOTEL AND CASINO, INC.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80257

(303) 844-3157

May 19, 2010 

Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Terri J. Abernathy

Luis Armando Martinez

Office of the United States Attorney 

District of New Mexico

555 South Telshor, Suite 300

Las Cruces, NM 88001

Scott M. Davidson

Scott M. Davidson, Ph.D., Esq., LLC 

1011 Lomas Blvd. NW

Albuquerque, NM 87102

John F. Robbenhaar

Office of the Federal Public Defender 

District of New Mexico

111 Lomas, NW, Suite 501

Albuquerque, NM 87102

RE: 09-2013, 09-2014, United States v. Quaintance 

Dist/Ag docket: 2:06-CR-00538-JCH

Dear Counsel:

Enclosed is a copy of the order and judgment.

Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court 

EAS/sls 

Appellate Case: 09-2014 Document: 01018424749 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 Page: 1
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the annual report of North Coast  Partners,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Wong
Peck Ling,  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer,  of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Dated:  September 28, 2004        Wong Peck Ling
        ------------------        ----------------------------------------------
                                  Wong Peck Ling,
                                  President and Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting
                                  Officer)
#### Cox *v.*Runnion and Wife.—On appeal.

*Monday, November*18.

ASSUMPSIT against *Andrew Runnion*and *Mary*his wife, for a debt due from the wife *dum sola. Held,*that it was no objection to the declaration that the Christian name only of the wife was stated. Lilly’s Entries, 27.
,:. 

b. 

~5 

pQ - 

. . . . . . . . 

~4. ,: OFFICE OF THE All-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

‘ATTORNEY-GENERAL 
s&i. c. D. s-, Peg0 2 
369 

,; 

Hon. C. D. SFrmwna, Pega 3 

:', 
BM.C.D. Slmnom. Page 8 

aj m8ting thbt th0 m8g0ias iu3sj enw0rs yew 

I’ znqery;.ws era.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ EDWARD E. COHENEdward E. CohenChief Executive Officer of the General PartnerMarch 14, 2007




117