alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NCMHD Health Disparities Research on Minority and Underserved Population (R01).                    

*Date:*                         November 19, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-9536,                         *mlaudesharp@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-27188 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Festive Northern Lights

The spectacular aurora borealis, or the “northern lights,” over Canada is sighted from the space station near the highest point of its orbital path. The station’s main solar arrays are seen in the left foreground.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss053e023965orig/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 15, 2017Image CreditNASASize4928x3280pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### Moore *v.*Herndon.—In error.

*Saturday, November*16.

THE plaintiff having introduced his testimony was called, on the defendant’s motion, and nonsuited. It appeared that when the plaintiff was called, he was in Court and did not answer. *Held,*that the nonsuit was with the implied consent of the plaintiff, and that he was not entitled to a writ of error (1).

(1)

 In a case where the plaintiff had submitted to a nonsuit, it was held that a writ of error in his favour would not lie. *Evans*v. *Phillips,*4 Wheat. 73. But if a plaintiff be nonsuited against his consent, he may have a writ of error. *Strother*v. *Hutchinson,*4 Bingh. 83. See, also, *Pollard*v. *Buttery,*Vol. 3 of these Rep. 239.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1222

JUANA DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL

ASSAULT; ELLEN HAMILTON, Executive Director;

DEBBIE BARRETT, Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-98-3851-4-22)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 13, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Gaines, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Arthur E.

Justice, Jr., TURNER, PADGETT, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Juana Davis appeals the district court’s order and judgment

granting summary judgment to the Pee Dee Coalition Against Domestic

And Sexual Assault and two of its employees. On appeal, Davis

contends that the district court erred by finding that she failed

to establish a prima facie case of retaliation for having engaged

in protected contact. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Pee Dee

Coalition, No. CA-98-3851-4-22 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31

                           CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve McKerihan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F,  and all reports on Form 6-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Crusade Global Trust No.1
of 2003;

2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar,  agreements,  for  inclusion  in these  reports  is  included  in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreements and based upon my knowledge
and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and servicing,  or similar,  agreements,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:_

Perpetual Trustees Consolidated Limited


                                         /S/  S. McKerihan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        S. McKerihan
                                        CFO - Crusade Management
                                        Limited Date: March 25, 2004
# X-29 Coloring Page

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Students

## Grade Levels

Grades K-4, Informal Education

## Subject

Art, Physical Science, Flight and Aeronautics

## Type

Play and Learn, Coloring and Puzzles

The X-29 coloring page shows an airplane with a unique wing design. The airplane was also built with other materials besides metal.

#### X-29 Coloring Page

#### Explore More:

              -  Airplane Coloring Pages for Kids
#### Davis v. Graniss and Others.

*Tuesday, May*21.

Assumpsit against *A.*and *B.,*the former of whom pleaded in bar of the action, and the latter, on whom process had been served, failed to appear. *Held,*that a verdict and judgment could not be taken against *A.*alone.

ERROR to the *La Porte*Circuit Court.

*W. Quarles,*for the plaintiff.

*J. A. Liston,*for the defendants.

Sullivan, J.

Assumpsit by *C. B. Graniss*and others against *Davis*and one *Allison*on a promissory note. *Davis*appeared and pleaded to the action. Allison, on whom process had been' duly served, entered no appearance. An issue was made on the plea filed by *Davis.*Verdict and judgment against *Davis*alone.

This judgment must be reversed. The error consists in taking judgment against one of the defendants only. The principles which govern suits against joint contractors are, we presume, familiar to all. A judgment by default should have been taken against Allison, and the jury that tried the issue made on the plea filed by Davis, should have been sworn to assess the damages against *Allison*also. 2 Arch. Pr. 28’ (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the filing of the plea set aside. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 The verdict for the plaintiffs in such case is as follows: The jurors, &c. say upon their oath that the said *Henry Danis*did undertake and promise, in manner and form as the plaintiffs have within complained against hint ; and they assess the plaintiffs’ damages by reason of the not performing the promises and undertakings within mentioned, as well against the said *Henry Darns*as against the said *John Allison,*over and above the costs and charges of the plaintiffs by them about their suit in this behalf expended, to 200 dollars, &c. [Judgment against both as in ordinary *cases.]'*Arch. Forms, 338.

*80But if the plaintiff in such case fail to obtain a verdict against the defendant who pleads in bar of the action, the jury must be discharged from assessing damages against the other who let judgment go by default for the contract being entire, the plaintiff must succeed against both the defendants or neither of them. 2 Arch. Pr. 28.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA004


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Research Steering Committee 
(Committee), in November, 2010, to consider actions affecting New 
England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations 
from this group will be brought to the full Council for formal 
consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, November 12, 2010 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Courtyard by Marriott, 225 
McClellan Highway, East Boston, MA 02128, telephone: (617) 569-5250; 
fax: (617) 561-0971.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council's Research Steering Committee 
will meet to review its mission, processes and products, as well as 
receive an update from NMFS' Northeast Cooperative Research Program 
concerning their recent activities.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-27099 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1765

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, 

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to 

refrain from such activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to5 Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA7 TIONS ACT. 

8 (a) RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES.—Section 7 of the Na9 tional Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended 
2

S 1765 IS 

1 by striking ‘‘except to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘au2 thorized in section 8(a)(3)’’. 

3 (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8 of the 

4 National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is amend5 ed—

6 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘: Provided,

7 That’’ and all that follows through ‘‘retaining mem8 bership’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b)—

10 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or to 

11 discriminate’’ and all that follows through ‘‘re12 taining membership’’; and 

13 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘covered 

14 by an agreement authorized under subsection 

15 (a)(3) of this section’’; and 

16 (3) in subsection (f), by striking clause (2) and 

17 redesignating clauses (3) and (4) as clauses (2) and 

18 (3), respectively. 

19 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

20 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) 

21 is amended by striking paragraph Eleven.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

s0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

145151

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145151

COA: 301389

Wayne CC: 09-020192-FH

ERNEST GRAHAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-4329

_____________________________ 

KHALAF MILLER, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Mark Borello, Judge. 

August 5, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

RAY, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Khalaf Miller, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00447

- CR

01

- 13

- 00448

- CR

Trial court case number: 1356098

1356099

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

The request for extension of time to file appellee’s brief in cause number 01

- 13

- 00447

-
CR on February 2, 2015 is DISMISSED AS MOOT . The deadline for the State to file its brief

in both of the above referenced cause numbers has previously been set for February 19, 2015,

and that deadline remains unchanged.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Rebeca Huddle

X A cting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 5, 2015
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Scivanta Medical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, David R. LaVance, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  January
      28, 2009
              By:
              /s/ David R. LaVanceDavid
      R. LaVancePresident
      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
# Sitemap

## July 04, 2018

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2018
- 07
- July 04, 2018

            - Sols 2102-2103: A Working Holiday
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/L. George Klaus           
|    |  | L. George Klaus              
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Michael A. Piraino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|    |  |                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Piraino                              
|    |  | Michael A. Piraino                                  
|    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                    SCHEDULE TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT UNDER
            HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
        OPTION HOLDER              NUMBER OF SHARES          EXERCISE PRICE              DATE OF GRANT
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
<S>                             <C>                     <C>                        <C>

George M. Dickens, Jr.                  42,000              $5.875 per share          January 29, 2002
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
Barry J. Kulpa                         110,000              $5.875 per share          January 29, 2002
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
Thomas S. McHugh                        40,000              $5.875 per share          January 29, 2002
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
John Mullin                             34,000              $5.875 per share          January 29, 2002
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
Nick H. Varsam                          34,000              $5.875 per share          January 29, 2002
------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
</TABLE>