alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Proposed subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY:

This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the European Atomic Energy Community.

This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 514,705.9 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride (68.00% U), 350,000 kg of which is uranium, from Areva Resources Canada, Inc. (Areva Resources) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to URENCO in Almelo, Netherlands. The material, which is currently located at Areva Resources, will be transferred to URENCO-Almelo for enrichment and use as fuel in civilian nuclear power programs in the United States and France. The material was originally obtained by Areva Resources from the Feed Component Substitution Implementing Contract.

In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice.

Dated: October 1, 2010.

For the Department of Energy.

Thomas P. D'Agostino,

Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-27501 Filed 10-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
(logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

 

 

February 26, 2015

 

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: Jim Barnard

600 Washington Blvd. 

Stamford, CT 06901

 

RE:          Annual Statement as to Compliance

WFRBS 2014 C23

 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014- C23, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a .   A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.   To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2015.

 

Best Regards,

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

 

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of EMPS Corporation on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Mirgali Kunayev,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2005                                  /s/ Mirgali Kunayev
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Mirgali Kunayev,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
#### Buckley *v.*Stanley.

*Friday, June*28.

A declaration in assumpsit described the written contract sued on to be for the executing of notes for the price of certain *books and stationary*purchased of the plaintiff by the defendant. The contract produced in evidence was only for the executing of notes for the price of the *books*purchased. *Held,*that the variance was fatal.

ERROR to the *Wayne*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

*Stanley*sued *BucJtley*in assumpsit. The declaration contains a special count on a written contract, and general counts for books and stationary sold and delivered. The general issue and several special pleas were filed. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The special count states, that in consideration that the plaintiff had sold to the defendant a *stock of*books and stationary, the defendant had executed the written contract declared on; that by this contract, the defendant promised to *163execute his notes payable at certain times for the whole *1 .*amount of the books and stationary so purchased, as soon the bills of the said books and stationary should be made out; and that the bills of the books and stationary were duly delivered to the defendant, but that he refused to execute the notes.

*J. S.*Newman, for the plaintiff.

*M. M. Ray*and *J. B. Ray,*for the defendant.

To sustain this count, the plaintiff offered in evidence a written contract, by which the defendant promised to execute his notes for the whole amount of the books purchased, so soon as the bills of the books should be made out. This evidence was objected to on the ground of variance, but the objection was overruled.

We think the objection should have been sustained. The written contract, with the breach of which the defendant is charged in the special count, is for the executing of notes for the price of certain *books and stationary ;*but the one. produced is only for the executing of notes for the price of *books.*These contracts appear not to be the same.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TAALIB-DIN NAJI.

January 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-73,630]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 20, 2010, applicable to workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Division of Internal Firm Services, Atlanta, Georgia. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 7, 2010 (75 FR 32224).                

At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers supply internal firm services.

New information shows that the Department did not correctly state the subject firm name in its entirety on the certification decision. The correct name of the subject firm should read PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators Group.

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to correct the name of the subject firm to read PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrators Group.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,630 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Internal Firm Services Client Account Administrator Group, Atlanta, Georgia, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 2, 2009, through May 20, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of October 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-27387 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
ex_182539.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


TO THE


HENRY SCHEIN, INC.


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014


 


 


WHEREAS, Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Henry Schein, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2014, and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) or an authorized committee may amend the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”), the Committee is authorized to amend the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to: (i) clarify the Committee’s ability to change the contribution percentage during a Plan Year, and (ii) suspend all contributions to the Plan, effective July 1, 2020.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1, 2020 as follows:


 


1.     Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“(a)          The Employer shall make a book-entry contribution to the Deferral Account of each Participant, equal to (i) the amount by which the Participant’s Base Compensation exceeds Recognized Compensation multiplied by (ii) seven percent (7%), or such other contribution percentage determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; provided that such other contribution percentage shall be established with respect to Base Compensation earned on or after the date of the Committee’s action. A contribution will be made with respect to a calendar quarter on behalf of a Participant if such Participant was employed on the last day of such calendar quarter. A Participant’s Deferral Account shall be credited on, or as soon as administratively feasible following, the September 30th immediately following the Plan Year during which the applicable calendar quarter occurs with respect to which the contribution is earned (or at least annually as of any date determined by the Committee in its sole discretion). Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant’s Deferral Account shall be credited with a contribution with respect to the Plan Year of the Participant’s retirement at or after the Normal Retirement Date, death or Disability. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Employer shall make no book-entry contribution to the Deferral Account of any Participant for Base Compensation paid on or after July 1, 2020.”


 


 


 


 





 










 








 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 2nd day of May, 2020.


 


 


HENRY SCHEIN, INC.


 


 


By: /s/ John Lee                                                  


Title:      Vice President, Global Compensation,                


                Benefits, HRIS and HR M&A
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Transition Report of OneLife Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KT/A for the transition period from May 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Robert Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 27, 2018By:/s/ Robert WagnerRobert WagnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

VY THI THACH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-35435

D.C. No. 2:00-cr-00059-JCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submission Deferred May 9, 2012

Seattle, Washington

Submitted April 5, 2013

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Vy Thi Thach appeals the denial of her petition for a writ of error coram nobis.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Thach’s petition rises or falls on whether Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356

(2010), applies retroactively. It is therefore foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s

FILED

APR 09 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 The Supreme Court declined to consider Chaidez’s arguments that Teague’s 1

bar on retroactivity should not apply when a petitioner challenges a federal conviction,

or at least should not apply when there is a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Chaidez, 133 S. Ct. at 1113 n.16.

2

decision in Chaidez v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1105 (2013), which held that

“under the principles set out in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), Padilla does not

have retroactive effect.” 

That the Supreme Court applied Teague in evaluating Chaidez’s challenge to

her federal conviction reinforces our authority holding that Teague’s framework

applies to collateral attacks on federal convictions. See United States v. Sanchez- 1

Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 667 (9th Cir. 2002) (Teague applies to federal prisoners).

AFFIRMED.
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                          /s/Gary Mentesana
                                        ------------------------------------
                                          Gary Mentesana
                                          Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
                                          Arch Street VIII, Inc. as
                                          Managing General Partner of
                                          Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII,
                                          A Limited Partnership


                                              Date:  August 14, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonorable X. Y. Cunnlngh~ 

County Auditor 

Oorsl oana, Texas 

Deer Sir: 

C. bi¶M, Attorney O 

writer for oonslde 

0, addreeesd to Oerald 

been referred to the 

80 followe: 

gular meeting of 

Court, Mr. kalege of a oonceselon 

oourthouse. 

above prlrllege doe8 not 

oee he receive any rerunHis only aouroa of lnHayes, CoinUlsaloner of Treclnot 1, 

of I&. Xelter &yea. 

Woes this relaticnahlg offer any berrler to 

the appointment or make the Comm.lssloneret CoUF$, 

or any of Its menbere guilty of nspotlam?" 
Hon. 6. ‘p. Cunningham, Fare 2 

Your attentlou la directed to Article 402, km1 

Code ot Texas, es followa: 

“30 oirioer or tide Stete or any officer 

of any district, county, At;-, praolnct, school 

distrlot, or other aunlolpal aubdlvlelon of thla 

etate, or any ofrlcer or renber of any state, 

dlstrlot, ccunty , city, aohool dletrlct, or other 

munloipal board, or 5udqe of any court, oreated 

by or under authority of any aenerel or special 

law of this Stote,pr any lcember cf the LagIsloture, ohall appoint, or vote for, or confirms 

the e~polnt.Eent to any offioe, poeltion, clerkski~, 

efiploynont , or duty, at any person related uithin the aeoond degree .b$ affinity or within the 

third degree by consanguinity to the person SO 

appointing or so votlne, or to any other member 

ot any suoh boa::d, the Ledslature, or oourt cf 

whloh euah person 80 ap::ointlnq or vctinc: Pep be 

a member, when the selery, iec8, or ooqenaatlon 

a? euch appointee is to bc paid for, dlreatly or 

lnfiirectly, out of or from public funds or fees 

ot office of nny kind oz chareoter whatsoever.” 

The purpose of the nepotlen statute Is to prohibit 

a pub110 ottlolal f7oa: apFolnting, voting: for, or ccnflrnIn! the appointment to any office, position, clerkship, employment, or duty, of any person related to him, or to any 

other nember of the court, bglslature, board, etc., of 

rhloh the oftlolel may be a member, within the prohibited 

degree, when the compenaetion of such appointee IS to be 

paid, either dlreotly or indireotly, out of pub110 funds. 

In the lnstont oaae, It is epxrent from the feats stated 

that Yr. Falter Heyea has not been appointed to any office, 

poeltion, clerkship, nor enrloyed to periorm any duty, end 

therefore, your question la answered In the negative. 

Tru8tin.c this mawera your inquiry, we are
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financialstatements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      4,633
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            241,872
<PP&E>                                      50,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              322,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       494,506
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    2,696
<OTHER-SE>                                  (174,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                322,925
<SALES>                                     16,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,799
<CGS>                                       11,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (167,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (167,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (167,059)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.06)


</TABLE>
F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS QUINNEY,

Plaintiff ! Appellant,

v.

SWIRE COCA!COLA USA,

Defendant ! Appellee.

No. 09-4118

(D.C. No. 2:07-CV-00788-PMW)

ORDER

Before KELLY and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time

to File Appellant Brief. The motion is denied. The captioned appeal is dismissed

for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-4118 Document: 01018343631 Date Filed: 01/07/2010 Page: 1