alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          66,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,856
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                51,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,372
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         170,234
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           174,121
<LOANS>                                        854,465
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (9,515)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,311,124
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,154,816
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,562
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,299
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,255
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,913
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,311,124
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 57,735
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,572
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,767
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                72,074
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,682
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,323
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           50,751
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,986
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 40,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,043
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,043
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,895
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,878
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,219
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 18,197
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,629
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (2,483)
<RECOVERIES>                                       383
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,515
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,473
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,042
        

</TABLE>
June 30, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ERIC L. BAUMGART , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00308

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________ _______________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant p ay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: In re 8650 Frisco, LLC d/b/a Estilo Gaucho Brazilian Steakhouse, 

Mandona, LLC, Galovelho, LLC, Bahtche, LLC, Claudio Nunes, and 

David Jeiel Rodrigues

Appellate case number: 01-15-00423-CV

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 23, 2015

Party filing motion: Relators

It is ordered that the relators’ motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd

Date: September 3, 2015
(logo)Prudential

 

 

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **RBS 2014-C23**

Period: **January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019(the “Reporting Period”)**

 

**AnnualCompliance Statement**

 

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard tothe Company’s role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the“Agreement”) dated as of September 1, 2014, pertaining to the above-referencedcertificates, that:

 

(i)      areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe relevant period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)    to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

(iii)   to the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligationsunder its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv)    the Company hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)    theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of February 21, 2020

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
NO. 07-12-0522-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 19, 2013

______________________________

In the Interest of N.M.G., A Child

______________________________

FROM THE 181st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 64,078-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Jason Gutierrez filed a notice of appeal on November 30, 2012. On 

December 13, 2012, the clerk’s record was filed. The reporter’s record was due on 

December 10, 2012. On December 27, 2012, this court notified the reporter by letter 

that the record was late and directed the reporter to respond, by January 7, 2013, and 

explain why it had not been filed. On January 7, 2013, the reporter filed a motion for 

extension of time to file the record, which was granted to February 7, 2013. To date, no 

response, status report, or reporter’s record has been filed.
2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the causes to the 181st District 

Court of Randall County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial 

court shall determine, via hearing or other reasonable means:

when the reporter’s record will be transcribed into written 

form and filed in accordance with the rules of appellate 

procedure and in a manner that does not further delay the 

prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of 

depriving the appellant of his right to appeal.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) 

execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issue. 

Additionally, the district court shall then cause those findings of fact and conclusions of 

law to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 18, 2013. Should further 

time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested 

before March 18, 2013.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20351 Summary Calendar

MARGARET L. KIZZEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF HOUSTON; BOB LANIER; LEE P. BROWN, Houston Mayor; JOE ROACH, Houston City Councilman; CITY OF HOUSTON CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION; LONNIE VARA, City of Houston Employee; LENORIA WALKER, City of Houston Employee; EVERETT A. BASS, City of Houston Employee; LOUIS MCKINNEY, City of Houston Employee; FRANK C. LOPEZ, City of Houston Employee; ANDREW CONTRERAS, City of Houston Employee; MICHAEL VAUGHNS, City of Houston Employee; RICHARD BROWN; DANIEL GUTIERREZ, Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-2208

________________________________________

April 2, 2001 Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *1 Talk v. Delta Airlines, Inc. , 165 F.3d 1021 (5th Cir. 1999).

2 Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North Texas, P.A. , 139 F.3d 532, 538 (5th Cir. 1998).

3 McInnis v. Alamo Community College Dist. , 207 F.3d 276 (5th Cir. 2000).

4 See id.

5 Sanchez v. United States Postal Service , 785 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1986); Branch v. Cole, 686 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. 1982).
2 Margaret Kizzee appeals an adverse summary judgment, contending that the district court erred in holding that she had failed to establish a prima facie case of
discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A review of the record discloses that Kizzee has not established that her moderate, intermittent difficulty in walking and working, apparently caused by lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and Reynaud’s Syndrome, constitutes a disability within the meaning of the ADA. 1 She has not established that she suffered an adverse employment action or that her working conditions were “so intolerable that a reasonable employee in her position would feel compelled to resign.” 2 Further, she has not established that she was penalized for using the handicapped parking area or that she was treated less favorably than other nondisabled employees. 3 Therefore, she has not established a prima facie case of discrimination due to her disability under the ADA. 4 Inasmuch as she has no constitutional right to counsel in a civil action, she may not bring a
claim that her counsel was ineffective. 5 Finally, we will not consider evidence6 Theriot v. Parrish of Jefferson , 185 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct.

2004 (2000).

7 Id.
3 which was not presented to the district court. 6 Accordingly, the appellees’ motion to strike Kizzee’s record excerpts is granted. 7 AFFIRMED; MOTION TO STRIKE RECORD EXCERPTS GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,749,000
<SECURITIES>                                     8,979,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,170,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       159,000
<INVENTORY>                                        296,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,067,000
<PP&E>                                           1,967,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,005,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,788,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            47,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,420,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,400,000
<SALES>                                          2,543,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,018,000
<CGS>                                            1,920,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,725,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,293,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       917,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,376,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,376,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .29



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         606,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,361,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   177,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,699,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,761,000
<PP&E>                                         454,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,085,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,215,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,144,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 19,792,000
<COMMON>                                    12,146,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,215,000
<SALES>                                      1,838,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,838,000
<CGS>                                        1,450,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,706,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (895,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (895,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (945,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,203-01

EX PARTE LINDA FAY CARNES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 19179-A IN THE 329 DISTRICT COURT th

FROM WHARTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

cocaine in an amount of two hundred to four hundred grams and sentenced to five years’

imprisonment. She did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that newly discovered laboratory analysis in this case reflects that she did

not possess any cocaine. 

Applicant’s claim is supported by the habeas record. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte
2

Mable, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. No. WR-81,358-01, delivered September 17, 2014). 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 19179-A in the 329 District Court of Harris th

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Wharton County to

answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 5, 2014

Do not publish
# Sitemap

## August 05, 2021

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2021
- 08
- August 05, 2021

            - NASA Continues RS-25 Testing with Sixth Installment at Stennis Space Center
            - NASA’s Juno Celebrates 10 Years With New Infrared View of Moon Ganymede
            - NASA HATTB
            - Principal Investigator Paromita Mitra
            - Technology Program Manager Eliad Peretz
            - Tour It Showcase with Infiniscope
            - Huge Rings Around a Black Hole
            - Research Astrophysicist Jeremy David Schnittman
            - Curiosity Celebrates Another Year on Mars
            - NASA Invites Media to Dedication of the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**Section
      1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer**









In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      P, Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.     The information contained in this Report
      fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
      the
      report.









Date: 
                July 26, 2005
            /s/ Douglas P.
                Baker
              Douglas P. Baker
              Chief
                Financial Officer
spsc-ex103_92.htm



 

EXHIBIT 10.3

SPS COMMERCE, INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY

Effective: December 10, 2019

Director annual retainer: Annual retainer, payable in cash, of $31,000 per director except for the chairperson who shall receive $61,000.

Committee chairs annual retainer: Annual retainers, payable in cash, of: 


		
	
Audit Committee:
	
$   20,000

	
Compensation Committee:
	
12,000

	
Finance and Strategy Committee:
	
10,000

	
Governance and Nominating Committee:
	
7,500




Committee member annual retainer: Annual retainers, payable in cash, of: 


		
	
Audit Committee:
	
$    8,000

	
Compensation Committee:
	
5,000

	
Finance and Strategy Committee:
	
5,000

	
Governance and Nominating Committee:
	
4,000




Annual non-statutory stock option grants:  


	
 
	
•
	
To purchase up to $85,000 of common stock calculated as the grant date fair value of the stock-based awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders using the closing sale price for a share of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders 





	
 
	
•
	
Granted to directors who are elected to the board at the annual meeting of stockholders 





	
 
	
•
	
Exercise price per share equal to the closing sales price for a share on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders 





	
 
	
•
	
Vest in four equal installments on the last day of each fiscal quarter with the first vesting occurring on the fiscal quarter end next following the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, provided the recipient remains a member of the board as of the vesting date 





	
 
	
•
	
Maximum term of seven years measured from the date of grant 




Annual restricted stock and/or deferred stock unit grants: 


	
 
	
•
	
To acquire up to $85,000 of restricted common stock or deferred stock units, or some combination of the two, at the director’s election, calculated by dividing $85,000 by the closing sale price for a share of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders 





	
 
	
•
	
Granted to directors who are elected to the board at the annual meeting of stockholders 





	
 
	
•
	
Vest in four equal installments on the last day of each fiscal quarter with the first vesting occurring on the fiscal quarter end next following the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, provided the recipient remains a member of the board as of the vesting date





	
 
	
•
	
Deferred stock units must be retained until completion of the director’s service on the board, and upon completion of such service, convert into an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock. A director may defer receipt of the shares for up to ten years after completion of service.




Reimbursement of expenses: The Company shall reimburse directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings.
#### CHESTER J. LA BANCA v. JACOBS SELTZER, M.D.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Stewart F.B. Baker, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Inspired Entertainment, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 29, 2018



| |  | /s/ Stewart F.B. Baker
| |  | ----------------------
# Saturn Apollo Program

Pictured left to right, in the Apollo 7 Crew Portrait, are astronauts R. Walter Cunningham, Lunar Module pilot; Walter M. Schirra, Jr., commander; and Donn F. Eisele, Command Module Pilot. The Apollo 7 mission, boosted by a Saturn IB launch vehicle on October 11, 1968, was the first manned flight of the Apollo spacecraft. 

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-6970642/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 3, 1968ProducerMSFCSize1520x1920pxPIA Number6970642The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 24, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### ROBERT L. GILL v. FOSTER M. VOORHEES, III.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.