alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 11Nano-Proprietary, Inc.Computation of Income (Loss) Per Share**

|                                                    |   | Three Months ended June. 30, |                           | Six Months ended June. 30, |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                                    |   | 2004                         |       | 2003                       |   | 2004 |       | 2003 |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
| Computation of loss per common share:                   |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |
|    Net loss applicable to common  shares |   | $(1,263,529)                 |                           | $(696,056)                 |   | $(2,375,170) |   | $(1,467,025) |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|    Weighted average number of common shares   |   | 96,536,111              |                           | 85,552,973            |   | 96,273,901  |   | 82,661,901  |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|    Net income (loss) per common share         |   | $(0.01)                      |                           | $(0.01)                    |   | $(0.02) |   | $(0.02) |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
| Computation of income ( loss ) per common               |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|    share assuming full dilution**             |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |                           |                       |   |   |   |   |

 

** No computation of diluted loss per common share is included for any period because suchcomputation results in an antidilutive loss per common share.
**Exhibit      11**

**Nano-Proprietary,      Inc.**

**Computation      of Income (Loss) Per Share**

|                                                       |   |  Three                Months ended March 31, |        |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------|
|                                                       |   |  2006                                        |        |  2005 |   |
| Computation              of loss per common share:         |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
|                                                       |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
| Net                loss applicable to common  shares  |   | $                                                 | (1,794,166  | ) | $ | (1,365,194 | ) |
|                                                       |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted                average number of common shares    |   |                                              | 100,017,273 |   |   | 97,914,179 |   |
|                                                       |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
| Net                income (loss) per common share          |   | $                                                 | (0.02       | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) |
|                                                       |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
| Computation                of income ( loss ) per common   |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
|                   share assuming full dilution** |   |                                              |        |   |   |   |   |
# Sitemap

## November 2012

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2012
- November 2012

            - 01
            - 02
            - 03
            - 04
            - 05
            - 06
            - 07
            - 08
            - 09
            - 10
            - 11
            - 12
            - 13
            - 14
            - 15
            - 16
            - 17
            - 18
            - 19
            - 20
            - 21
            - 22
            - 23
            - 25
            - 26
            - 27
            - 28
            - 29
            - 30
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Alpine Air Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we, Eugene R. Mallette, CEO and Rick C. Wood, Accounting Manager and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1)  The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:January 26 , 2010By:/s/ Eugene R. MalletteEugene R. MalletteCEODate:January 26 , 2010By:/s/Rick C. WoodRick C. WoodAccounting Manager and Principal Financial Officer
June 25, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES ROBERT WILLIAM S , JUNIOR , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00876

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the ju dgment as ent ered, which is cap able of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED to reflect the trial court found true the State’s allegation numbered 12

. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED

. We further order appellant pay all cost s expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance

.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT DAVIS.

February 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 17, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LISA RENEE YANCEY,

Plaintiff ! Appellant,

v.

DIVISION OF CHILD AND FAMILY

SERVICES; DANE C. NOLAN; UTAH

COURT OF APPEALS; UTAH

SUPREME COURT,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-4174

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00698-DB)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 

10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-4174 Document: 01018368295 Date Filed: 02/17/2010 Page: 1
#### Richardson and Others *v.*The State.—In error.

*Wednesday, November*28.

THE prosecuting attorney applied to the Circuit Court, under the statutes of 1832 and 1835, for judgment vesting in the state certain land belonging to the plaintiffs in error, for the non-payment of taxes. The land was described in the school commissioner’s list as follows : “ *Richardson's*heirs, 56 acres in the S. E. quarter of section 8, township 12, range 13.” Held, that the description of the land was too imperfect to authorise the judgment applied for.
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2835

___________

Ilester Malone, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Hennepin County Medical Center, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 24, 2001

 Filed: April 27, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ilester Malone appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal with prejudice of his

employment-discrimination case for failure to comply with a court order. We conclude

that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as Malone exhibited a pattern of

intentional delay by repeatedly failing to adhere to pretrial and hearing schedules.

See Hunt v. City of Minneapolis, 203 F.3d 524, 527 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of

review; dismissal with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) should be used only in
-2-

cases of willful disobedience of court order or where litigant exhibits pattern of

intentional delay; district court need not find appellant acted in bad faith, but only that

he acted intentionally as opposed to accidentally or involuntarily).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Maritime Ventures, Inc.

(the  "Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the year  ended June 30,  2005, Jehu

Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of

his knowledge:



(1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of

Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly

presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition

and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jehu Hand



Jehu Hand

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(principal executive and financial officer

February 14, 2006











<PAGE>
Document

Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.
EXECUTIVE EXCESS RETIREMENT PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016)


        Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. Executive Excess Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016) (the “Plan”), to be effective as of May 1, 2020.  Words used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.


Section 1


        The last sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) for 2012, the Participant's Excess Employer Contribution Benefit shall be an amount equal to the Matching Employer Contributions attributable to the Excess 401(k) Benefits he is prevented from receiving under the Profit Sharing Plan because of various Code limitations or as a result of his deferral of Compensation under this Plan and (b) in no event shall the Participant be entitled to receive Excess Employer Contribution Benefits under the Plan effective with the first payroll period ending on or after May 1, 2020.”


Section 2


Section 3.4 of the Plan is hereby amended adding a new sentence to the end thereof to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, in no event shall the Participant be entitled to receive a Transitional Benefit under the Plan for Plan Years commencing on and after January 1, 2020.”




EXECUTED  this 30th day of April, 2020.




HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.


By: /s/ Suzanne S. Taylor
Title:  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,205,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,276)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,537,826
<PP&E>                                       1,909,639
<DEPRECIATION>                               (900,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,376,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          817,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,934
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,462,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,376,074
<SALES>                                        520,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               520,470
<CGS>                                          300,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,127,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (860,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (860,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (860,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
585 A.2d 368

#### SUPERIOR AIR PRODUCTS CO. v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
# Sitemap

## December 31, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 12
- December 31, 2011

            - Saturn Tour Dates: 2012
            - 2012 Saturn Tour Highlights
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable
investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: November 6, 2003 |  | 



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, George
Ecker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of OCTuS Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2009  fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of OCTuS Inc.





Date:
      November 23, 2009
            
            
            /s/
      George EckerGeorge
      Ecker
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2



Huttig Building Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David L. Fleisher, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) of Huttig Building Products, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                       |  |                                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 12, 2005 |  | /s/ DAVID L. FLEISHER
|                       |  | By:                   |  | David L. Fleisher                                     
|                       |  | Title:                |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Secretary



1
Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20419

Contact: Arlin Winefordner FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

 (202) 653-6772, ext. 1162 April 27, 2010 

 FAX: (202) 653-7130 

V/TDD 1-800-877-8339 

 (Federal Relay Service) 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD (MSPB) 

SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITS OPEN GOVERNMENT PLAN 

Today, the MSPB published a Federal Register Notice seeking public comment on its 

Open Government Plan (www.mspb.gov/open). The MSPB’s Open Government Plan was 

developed in response to President Obama’s January 21, 2009 Memorandum on Transparency 

and Open Government and the Office of Management and Budget’s December 8, 2009 Open 

Government Directive. The Open Government Initiative (www.whitehouse.gov/open) is 

predicated on three principles: Transparency—Federal agencies are to provide the public with 

information about government activities; Participation—Federal agencies are to provide the 

public with the opportunity to participate in policy-making; and, Collaboration—Federal 

agencies are to work with and cooperate with all levels of government, non-profit entities, 

businesses, and with the public. 

MSPB Chairman Susan Tsui Grundmann stated, “The MSPB strives to be a model 

agency for openness and transparency in government. It is my hope that our many 

stakeholders will participate in this opportunity to suggest how we can improve our processes or 

better meet the needs of those that conduct business with the MSPB.“ 

The public comment period ends May 27, 2010. The public is encouraged to direct 

comments and suggestions to MSPB’s Open Government Working Group at 

opengovernment@mspb.gov. Address written comments to William D. Spencer, Clerk of the 

Board, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20419. 

The U.S. Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) is an independent, non-partisan, quasi-judicial agency with 

responsibility for deciding Federal employee appeals from management action taken against them and for protecting 

the integrity of the civil service and other Federal merit systems. The MSPB also conducts studies of the civil service 

and other merit systems in the Executive Branch.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Alfred Coscina, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

/s/ Alfred Coscina
Alfred Coscina
Chief Financial Officer
November 4, 2004
#### May and Others *v.*The State.—On appeal.

*Monday, November*30.

A *SCIRE FACIAS,*issued by a justice of the peace against bail for the stay of execution, alleged that *A.*on, fee., obtained judgment before the justice, at, &c., (stating the township, county, and state,) for the sum of, fee., debt, With interest thereon from, &c., till paid, and costs of suit taxed at, fee., making in all the sum of, fee., as by the transcript thereof duly certified appeared. It then stated the entry- of bail, alleged that the judgment was in full force, that execution thereof remained to be made, and concluded with a command to summon the bail to appear and show cause, fee. The *scire facias*was objected to, because it did not allege against whom the judgment stayed by the bail was rendered. Held, that the objection, were it otherwise valid, could not be sustained, as the form prescribed by the statute was pursued. R.'S. 1838, pp. 396, 7.