alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sitemap

## April 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- April 2023

            - 01
            - 02
            - 03
            - 04
            - 05
            - 06
            - 07
            - 10
            - 11
            - 12
            - 13
            - 14
            - 15
            - 17
            - 18
            - 19
            - 20
            - 21
            - 24
            - 25
            - 26
            - 27
            - 28
            - 29
            - 30
# KSC-99pp0412

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- The cockpit of the orbiter Atlantis is seen in the round, revealing the new full-color flat panel Multifunction Electronic Display Subsystem (MEDS), also called the "glass cockpit." The recently installed MEDS upgrade improves crew/orbiter interaction with easy-to-read, graphic portrayals of key flight indicators like attitude display and mach speed. The installation makes Atlantis the most modern orbiter in the fleet and equals the systems on current commercial jet airliners and military aircraft. Atlantis is scheduled to fly on mission STS-101 in early December

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-99pp0412/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 9, 1999ProducerKSCSize2617x1730pxPIA NumberKSC-99pp0412The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### RENE R. BEAUDOIN v. BELMAR TAVERN OWNERS ASSOCIATION.

May 12, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 216 *N.J.Super.*177)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 19, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

SIMON AMARO,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-1546

 (D. C. No. 1:08-CR-00436-JLK-1)

 

ORDER

Appellant’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal is granted. See

10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9)

This order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1546 Document: 01018405340 Date Filed: 04/19/2010 Page: 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under subpart B(formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations(                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*).                

The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0258.                

*Date Filed:*                     October 14, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                    November 4, 2010.                

*Description:*                    Joint application of Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. (“Centurion”), Sky Lease I, Inc.d/b/a TradeWinds Airlines (“Sky Lease”) and Arrow Air, Inc. (“Arrow”) requesting approval of the de facto transfer of the international certificate and exemption authority currently held by Arrow.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0260.                

*Date Filed:*                     October 15, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                    November 5, 2010.                

*Description:*                    Application of Air Charter, Inc. dba Air Flamenco requesting authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations,Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-27038 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### Morgan *v.*Anderson and Wife.—In error.

*Tuesday, May*25.

THE Probate Court of *Parke*county appointed *William Morgan*as the guardian of *Mary*Morgan, a minor under fourteen years of age. The Court, in 1840, on the application of *James C. Anderson*and his wife, the mother of the minor, revoked the appointment of Morgan, and appointed the applicants guardians in his stead, on account of the relationship of *Anderson's*wife to the ward. *Held,*that the Court had not power to remove a guardian, except in cases relating to the faithful performance of his trust, or to the sufficiency of the security given by him; and that, therefore, the removal in this case was without authority. R. S. 1838, pp. 195, 196.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000891915
<NAME> RECONDITIONED SYSTEMS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,279,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,346,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (37,500)
<INVENTORY>                                    918,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,587,129
<PP&E>                                         596,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                (396,903)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,979,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          710,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,586,982
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,318,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,979,262
<SALES>                                      2,297,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,297,796
<CGS>                                        1,717,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,140,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (16,168)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                173,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            173,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
# Sitemap

## May 12, 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- 05
- May 12, 2023

            - Two for Two! NASA Launches 2nd Super Pressure Balloon from New Zealand
            - Media, Public Invited to Meet Solvers in NASA Space Food Challenge
            - In Case You Missed It: A Weekly Summary of Top Content from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
            - Space Station Science Highlights: Week of May 8, 2023
            - 50th Anniversary of the Skylab 1 Launch
            - NASA Employees Named Finalists for Top Federal Award
            - NASA Sets Coverage for Axiom Mission 2 Briefings, Events, Broadcast
            - NASA Provides Coverage of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Meeting
            - Evolving Artemis Mission Operations
            - 75 Years Ago: First Launch of a Two-Stage Rocket
Exhibit 32
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alpine Air Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Eugene R. Mallette, Chief Executive Officer and Don T. Squire Jr., Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: 01/27/2007                      /s/ Eugene R. Mallette
      -----------                      ---------------------------
                                       Eugene R. Mallette
                                       Chief Executive Officer

Dated: 01/27/2007                      /s/ Don T. Squire Jr.
      -----------                      ---------------------------
                                       Don T. Squire Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 13,562.

#### Lawrence et al. *v.*Wood, Administrator.

*Apptcat..*— Dismissal *of.*— Assignment *of*Errors.— *When Must he Made.*— Unless the assignment of error is made within one year from the date of the rendition of the judgment appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed, notwithstanding the transcript may have been filed within the year.

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

*W. D. Frazer, J. S, Frazer, W B. Hess*and *M. A. O. Packard,*for appellants.

*A. G. Wood, L. H. Haymond*and *L. W. Boyse,*for appellee.

*453Coffey, J.

Final judgment was rendered in this cause in the circuit court on the 19th day of January, 1886. The transcript was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on the 17th day of January, 1887.

The assignment of errors was made on the 25th day of August, 1887. The joinder in error was made on the same day. The cause was submitted on the 26th day of September, 1887, and on the 8th day of February, 1890, the appellee filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal, alleging for cause that the assignment of errors was not made within one year from the date of final judgment in the circuit court.

It is claimed by the appellee that in order to confer jurisdiction upon this court the transcript must be filed, and the assignment of errors made, within one year from the date of the rendition of the judgment in the circuit court. On the other hand, it is contended by the appellants that this court acquires jurisdiction when the transcript is filed within the year, and that the assignment of errors may be made afterwards.

The case of *Bacon*v. *Withrow,*110 Ind. 94, is decisive of the question now before us. In that case final judgment was rendered on the 10th day of July, 1885, and the transcript filed in the office of the clerk of this court on the 21st day of December of that year. The assignment of errors was filed on the 7th day of December, 1886. The appeal was dismissed on motion. It was said in that case that under the rule announced in the case of *Price*v. *Baker,*41 Ind. 570, a case may be in this court for the purpose of obtaining process before the assignment of errors is filed; but when a year is allowed to elapse without filing an assignment of errors, it is quite clear that the case can not be regarded as properly in this court. The case of *Smythe*v. *Boswell,*117 Ind. 365, is also an authority in support of the contention of the appellee in this case.

In the case of *Harshman*v. *Armstrong,*43 Ind. 126, no *454question was before the court relating to the time within which the assignment of errors should be filed, and for that reason the case can not be regarded as an authority upon the question presented in this case.

Filed March 13, 1890.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
1 min read

# Photo Archivist and Photographer Aubrey Gemignani

### Thalia K. Patrinos

Mar 21, 2023

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

“People aren’t always recognized for who they are at work.

“So giving a person time to actually talk about themselves, and be proud of what they do, and talk about how hard it might be to maintain their career with everything else going on — makes them feel valued and appreciated. And highlighting them in that way on the Faces of NASA page, makes that pride permanent.

“I think I’m always seeking out projects that help people feel seen. And maybe that’s why I got so into photography initially. I struggle with that myself — feeling seen. And so to help other people feel seen is definitely an interest of mine that I keep coming back to.”

— Aubrey Gemignani, Photo Archivist/Photographer, Co-founder of Faces of NASA, NASA Headquarters

*Image Credit: NASA / Joel Kowsky**Interviewer: NASA / Thalia Patrinos*

Check out some of our other Faces of NASA.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Al Coscina, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

/s/ Al Coscina
By: Al Coscina
Chief Financial Officer
March 22, 2004
| (logo) ncb National Cooperative Bank | 2011 Crystal DriveSuite, 800 Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|

February 26, 2016  

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor 

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor 

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance WFRBS 2014 C22

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2016.

 

 

Best regards, 

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, C. Richard Piazza, Chief Executive Officer of Chemokine Therapeutics Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Richard Piazza

C. Richard Piazza

Chief Executive Officer



April 16, 2007





I, Bashir Jaffer, Chief Financial Officer of Chemokine Therapeutics Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bashir Jaffer

Bashir Jaffer

Chief Financial Officer



April 16, 2007
****

## Kipp Teague

RetroWeb
Contact Light

The photo below was taken in 1999.

December 2002

----
#### Fitch *v.*Polke.

*Tuesday, May*21.

If, in an action of debt on a promissory note, issue be joined on a plea in bar as to part of the demand, and be found for the plaintiff, and there be no answer to the residue, — the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the amount of the debt with interest.

ERROR to the *Gass*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Debt by *Police*against *Fitch*on a promissory note. The note was for the payment of 685 dollars with interest, and was dated the 14th of *August,*1837. Plea, *nil debet*as to 150 dollars, parcel, &c. The plaintiff joined issue on the plea, and prayed judgment for the part unanswered.

A judgment was then entered, that the plaintiff ought to recover the sum of 535 dollars, parcel of the debt in the declaration mentioned which remains unanswered, and also the sum of 32 dollars and 10 cents damages for the detention thereof; but because of the issue as to 150 dollars, the *87residue of the debt, let the further judgment be stayed until the determinatipn of that issue.

*H. Chase,*for the plaintiff.

*H. Cooper,*for the defendant.

A jury was afterwards impanelled to try the issue, and a verdict found in favour of the plaintiff for the sum of 685 dollars in debt, and 42 dollars in damages. The defendant moved for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was for too large a sum. The plaintiff entered a *remittitur*of 535 dollars debt and 33 dollars and 44 cents damages, of the amount found by the jury.

The Court overruled the motion for a new trial, and rendered final judgment, on the 31st of August, 1838, in favour of the plaintiff for 685 dollars debt, and 41 dollars and 47 cents damages, making in all the sum of 726 dollars and 47 cents, together with costs.

There is no error in these proceedings. A part of the cause of action w1 *****7as unanswered, and the issue of fact as to the residue was found for the plaintiff. He was therefore, under the circumstances of the case, entitled to a final judgment for the amount of the debt sued for with interest; and that is the amount of this judgment (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with 6 *per cent.*damages and costs.

(1)

*Vide*Cross v. *Watson et al. May*term, 1842. If the declaration in assumpsit or covenant contain not only a recoverable claim, but also another not recoverable, it may be advisable to plead only to the latter, and let the plaintiff take judgment by default as to the former, in which case the plaintiff must enter a *nolle prosequi*as to the unsustainable part of his claim, or proceed to issue and trial at the peril of costs as to the latter ; or the defendant may, to avoid the costs of an inquiry, confess the action as to part and as to named damages, and plead as to the residue ; but then immediately execution for the sum confessed might issue. 3 Chitt. G. P. 674.
#### AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH BORTOS, APPELLANT.

Argued October 19, 1944

Decided January 4, 1945.

For the appellant, *Mario Turtur.*

For the respondent, *Shellon Pitney.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation ease, and the question before us is purely one of fact, namely, whether the death of appellant’s decedent was due to a compensable occupational disease. The evidence in the case was carefully considered by the Supremo Court and is fully discussed in the opinion of that court, *ubi sufra.*

We are asked on this appeal to make a finding of fact contrary to that of the Supreme Court and decide on the *328evidence that death was due to an accident rather than to the disease. The rule is fundamentally settled, however, that where the judgment of the Supreme Court in *certiorari*is supported, as regards the facts, by a substantial basis of testimony, this court will not review the facts. *Ford Motor Co.*v. *Fernandez,.114: N. J. L.*202, 204, and cases cited; *Board of Education*v. *Shepherd,*119 *Id.*413; *Pitchenick*v. *New York Folding Box Co.,*129 *Id.*399.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is accordingly affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor., Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Dill, JJ. 9.

*For reversal*— Perskie, J. 1. '
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JUAN CRUZ.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.