alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I,  Rod Solow, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15f-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,  or caused such internal control over financial reporting  to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 26, 2010



/s/ Rod Solow

Rod Solow

Chief Executive Officer
# Sitemap

## April 07, 2021

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2021
- 04
- April 07, 2021

            - Trio of Fast-Spinning Brown Dwarfs May Reveal a Rotational Speed Limit
            - Say Cheese on Mars: Perseverance’s Selfie With Ingenuity
            - Get Social with NASA on Earth Day 2021
            - NASA’s Odyssey Orbiter Marks 20 Historic Years of Mapping Mars
            - NASA’s OSIRIS-REx Completes Final Tour of Asteroid Bennu
            - Probing for Life in the Icy Crusts of Ocean Worlds
            - NASA Announces 12th Round of Candidates for CubeSat Space Missions
            - Team Readies Solar Arrays for Flight to Station
            - NASA’s Webb Telescope Packs Its Sunshield for a Million Mile Trip
            - Mycotecture Off Planet
2 min read

# 50 Years Ago: Paine Becomes NASA Deputy Administrator

### John Uri

#### Johnson Space Center

May 26, 2018

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

50 years ago, on the way to the Moon...

On March 25, 1968, Thomas O. Paine was sworn in as NASA’s Deputy Administrator.  The Agency had been without a second-in-command since the resignation of Robert C. Seamans in October 1967, although he stayed on in a consultant role until his successor was named.  Paine was an outsider to NASA; although he had aerospace experience he had no prior experience working with the federal bureaucracy.  Born in Berkeley, CA, in 1921, he received a Bachelor’s degree in engineering from Brown University, and Master’s and Doctorate degrees in metallurgy from Stanford University.  He joined the General Electric Corporation in 1949 and was manager of its Center for Advanced Studies when selected for his NASA position.

The Deputy Administrator position is a presidential appointment, and Paine met with President Lyndon B. Johnson on January 31.  The President formally appointed Paine the next day and he won Congressional approval the following week.  Paine’s extensive experience as a scientist, engineer and manager became very useful in his position as Deputy Administrator as NASA was still working to recover from the Apollo fire and meet President Kennedy’s goal of landing a man on the Moon before the end of the decade.  Later in the year, Paine would be a key player in the decision to send Apollo 8 to the Moon.

On March 31, President Johnson surprised the nation by announcing that he would not run for re-election.   NASA Administrator James E. Webb, a close ally of Johnson, didn’t want to stay on until a new President was inaugurated in 1969.  Webb announced his resignation in October, thus Paine served as Acting Administrator by the time Apollo 8 circled the Moon.  When he took office President Richard M. Nixon would ask Paine to stay on as Administrator, and in July 1969, the two men would meet on the aircraft carrier USS *Hornet* to welcome home the Apollo 11 crew from the Moon.

More About Administrator Paine
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated May 1, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2028 contained in Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-237830) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 1, 2020
Dismiss and Opinion July 2, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-13-00105-CR

DARRYL JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB11-35023-F



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the ap peal. Appellant’s couns el has approved the

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and

this decision be certified be low for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 130105F.U05
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1715]


Approval for Expanded Manufacturing Authority; Foreign-Trade 
Subzone 33E; DNP IMS America Corporation (Thermal Transfer Ribbon 
Printer Roll Manufacturing); Mount Pleasant, PA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Regional Industrial Development Corporation of 
Southwestern Pennsylvania, grantee of FTZ 33, has requested an 
expansion of the scope of manufacturing authority on behalf of DNP IMS 
America Corporation (DNP), within Subzone 33E in Mount Pleasant, 
Pennsylvania, (FTZ Docket 9-2010, filed 2/4/2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 6635-6636, 2/10/2010) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand the scope of manufacturing authority 
under zone procedures to include activity related to thermal transfer 
ribbon printer roll manufacturing within Subzone 33E, as described in 
the application and Federal Register notice, is approved, subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26416 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
----

| 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Jay Gottlieb                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jay Gottlieb                                     |   |
| Chairman      of the Board and President              |   |
| (performing      the functions of principal executive |   |
| officer      and principal financial officer)         |   |

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE DAVIS.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION**     OnAugust 10, 2007, Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certify, to such persons’ knowledge, that:(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 10, 2007 /s/ Gregg Lapointe   Gregg Lapointe   Director                                                 /s/ George Stuart   George Stuart   Chief Financial Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Sitemap

## April 06, 1996

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1996
- 04
- April 06, 1996

            - STS-76 Atlantis
Document

Exhibit 10.10(a)

REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT JOINDER
The undersigned is executing and delivering this joinder (this “Joinder”) pursuant to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2019 (as the same may hereafter be amended, the “Registration Rights Agreement”), among Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the other Persons named as parties therein. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Registration Rights Agreement.
By executing and delivering this Joinder to the Company, and upon acceptance hereof by the Company upon the execution of a counterpart hereof, the undersigned hereby agrees to become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the Registration Rights Agreement as the VG Stockholder and as a Holder of Registrable Securities in the same manner as if the undersigned were an original signatory to the Registration Rights Agreement, and the undersigned’s shares of Common Stock shall be included as Registrable Securities under the Registration Rights Agreement to the extent provided therein. The parties hereby agree that any reference to the VG Stockholder in the Registration Rights Agreement after the date hereof shall be to the undersigned as memorialized by this Joinder. 
[Signature Pages Follow]











Accordingly, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder as of March 16, 2020.
						
	Vieco 10 Limited	
		
	By:	/s/ James Cahillane
	Name:	James Cahillane
	Its:	Authorized Signatory
		
		
	Address:	
		
	Vieco 10 Limited	
	Craigmuir Chambers	
	P.O. Box 71	
	Road Town	
	Tortola	
	British Virgin Islands	
	Attention: George Whitesides, Director	




						
	Agreed and Accepted as of 
March 16, 2020	
		
	Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.	
		
	By:	/s/ George Whitesides
	Name:	George Whitesides
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer
#### CHARLES J. RIGGS, ET AL. v. TOWNSHIP OF LONG BEACH.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*69)
# NASA’s DC-8 Flying Laboratory

NASA's DC-8 flying science laboratory is seen in this photo illustration in which the sky has been replaced.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/nasas-dc-8-jb/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Aeronautics
Image CreditNASA / Jim BankeSize2304x900pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Jim Banke								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Credit Income Fund - I on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Carey Credit Income Fund - I , does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofCarey Credit Income Fund - I.

Date:March 21, 2017/s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMARK J. DECESARISChief Executive OfficerDate:March 21, 2017/s/ Paul S. Saint-PierrePAUL S. SAINT-PIERREChief Financial Officer


The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of Carey Credit Income Fund - I or the certifying officers.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Credit Income Fund - I and will be retained by Carey Credit Income Fund - I and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65707-65708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice Regarding Consideration and Processing of Applications for 
Financial Assistance Under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement 
Financing (RRIF) Program

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By this document, FRA is issuing a technical correction to the 
notice published in the Federal Register on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 
60165) regarding consideration and processing of applications for 
financial assistance under the RRIF Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Amani, Chief of the Credit 
Programs Division, Office of Railroad Development, Federal Railroad 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 
(telephone: (202) 493-6051; fax: (202) 493-6333; and e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d092b1a2b2b1a2b1fe91bdb1beb990b4bfa4feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8ba998a9a998a99d6b995999691b89c978cd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>); or Casey Symington, Attorney Advisor, Office of 
Chief Counsel, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 
SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-6349; fax: (202) 493-
6068; and e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6122001204184f32180c080f06150e0f21050e154f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45062436203c6b163c282c2b22312a2b05212a316b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA published a notice in the Federal 
Register on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60165) regarding FRA's 
consideration and processing of applications for financial assistance 
under the RRIF Program. On page 60166 of the notice, FRA inadvertently 
misstated information concerning loans that have been made under the 
RRIF Program since the enactment of the Transportation Equity Act for 
the 21st Century of 1998, Public Law 105-178 (1998) (TEA-21). FRA is 
hereby correcting that information, stated in the first column, second 
paragraph on page 60166 of the notice, to read as follows: ``A total of 
28 loans in an aggregate, initial principal amount of approximately 
$1.01 billion have been made under the RRIF Program since TEA-21 was 
enacted. Of these, a total of 3 loans have been repaid in full.'' The 
notice is otherwise unchanged.


[[Page 65708]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 20, 2010.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-26942 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN GENERAL TERM, 1872.

#### James R. Elliott et al *v.*Henry Boedecker, Appellant.

Appeal from Bn air, Judge.

*"Verdict*— when *will not be*disturbed—

*Instructions*— when *presumed correct.*

When the evidence is not in the record, the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed, and the instructions given to the jury-will, in the absence of the evidence, be.presumed to be correct.

*iGeorge T. Morton,*for appellant.'

*Lamb <Sf McLain,*for appellee.

Rand, J.

This was a suit brought by Elliott & Denny against Henry Boedecker, on an account for services ren*165dered by them as real estate agents, and brokers, for negotiating a sale of defendant’s real estate to one Pearson. The suit was instituted before a Justice of the Peace, and judgment by default against defendant. After the time of appealing from the Justice’s judgment had elapsed, defendant obtained an order, at Special Term, granting him an appeal. The case, after a motion by plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal was overruled, was tried at Special Term by a jury, and a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and there was a judgment on the verdict over defendant’s motion for a new trial, and an appeal was taken to General Term. The assignments* of error are:

*First,*The Court erred in instructing the jury.

Second, In overruling the motion for a new trial.

The reasons assigned for a new trial are, that the verdict of the jury is not according to law — is contrary to the evidence, and is not supported by the evidence; also that the Court erred in instructing the jury.

The evidence is not in the record, and it would be difficult without it, to say that the verdict is contrary to the law, or evidence, or that it is not sustained by the evidence.

The instructions complained of, might have been applicable to the evidence given to the jury, and if so, we can not reverse this case on the grounds that the instructions were erroneous. See *Coyner*v. *Lynde,*10 Ind., page 283.

The plaintiffs have assigned for cross-error, that the Court erred in granting defendant an appeal from the judgment of the Justice of the Peace.

The defendant filed his affidavit, stating that the constable’s return to the summons shows that it was served by leaving a copy at his last usual place of residence, that defendant never got said copy, never heard of such copy being left as stated in this return, and he never heard of the institution of the suit until the expiration of thirty days after the rendition of the judgment.

*166We think the affidavit was sufficient, and the Court at Special Term, havipg sustained the motion, and granted an appeal, we can not say he was not fully justified in doing so. Judgment is affirmed with costs.
585 A.2d 361

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE LEE ROBERTS.

July 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.