alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

JOHN STEVKO; RICHARD &

ROSEMARIE LETOURNEAU;

ROBERT IDE; LUCAS & BARBARA

AMATO, and PARVIZ TAYEBATI,

Petitioners.

No. 09-1557

(D.C. No. 1:09-MD-02063-JLK-KMT)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before LUCERO, EBEL, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners John Stevko, Richard & Rosemarie Letourneau, Robert Ide,

Lucas & Barbara Amato, and Parviz Tayebati have filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus seeking to vacate an order of the district court appointing lead

plaintiffs in two securities class actions captioned In re Rochester National

Municipal Fund and In re AMT-Free Municipal Fund. 

“[A] writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy, and is to be invoked only in

extraordinary circumstances.” In re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 568 F.3d 1180,

1186 (10th Cir. 2009) (quotation omitted). “It is not appropriate to issue a writ

when the most that could be claimed is that the district courts have erred in ruling

on matters within their jurisdiction.” Id. at 1187. Accordingly, we will issue the

writ “only when the district court has acted wholly without jurisdiction or so

Appellate Case: 09-1557 Document: 01018354761 Date Filed: 01/25/2010 Page: 1
-2-

clearly abused its discretion as to constitute usurpation of power.” Id. at 1186

(quotations omitted). Petitioners must show that they have “no other adequate

means to attain [] relief” and “that [their] right to the writ is clear and

indisputable.” Id. at 1187 (quotation omitted). In exercising our discretion, we

must also “be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” Id.

(quotation omitted). 

We conclude that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the district

court “acted wholly without jurisdiction or so clearly abused its discretion as to

constitute usurpation of power.” Id. at 1186. Accordingly, we DENY the petition

for a writ of mandamus.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1557 Document: 01018354761 Date Filed: 01/25/2010 Page: 2
Exhibit 34.9



|     |  |                                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Plante & Moran, PLLC
10 South Riverside Plaza 9th floor Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax:
312.207.1066 Plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLCs (the Company) compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has
determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by
this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.



LOGO

Chicago, IL

January 27,
2017



LOGO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ADRIAN L. COLLINS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 240 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant.



Date:  August 10, 2005                           By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3


 


ALLIED
ESPORTS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


 


April
24, 2020


 


VIA
EMAIL


 


Frank
Ng


Frank
Ng Frank@alliedesports.com


 


		Re:	Employment
                                         Agreement



 


Reference
is made to that certain Employment Agreement dated effective September 20, 2019 between Allied Esports Entertainment, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and you (the “Employment Agreement”). By executing below,
you agree that your current annual base salary of $300,000, will be reduced to an annual base salary of $60,000, effective May
1, 2020, for the following six-month period.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Adam Pliska
	 	Adam Pliska, President




 


	ACKNOWLEDGED:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Frank Ng	 
	Frank Ng
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

I, Alan Gaines, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Dune
Energy, Inc. (f/k/a IP Factory, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dune Energy,
Inc., (f/k/a IP Factory, Inc.).


Dated: November 13, 2003
                                                   /s/ Alan Gaines
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Alan Gaines


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Gordon Link, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



|August 8, 2003 | /s/GORDON LINKGordon Link
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 
|-------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99.1






                         CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                    OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


     The undersigned officer of Crusade Management Limited, a company
organized under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby
certifies on behalf of CML and on his own behalf for purposes of the
Crusade Global Trust No. 1 of 1999 Class A-1, Class A-2, and Class A-3
Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and

     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied
           with all conditions and covenants under the Transaction
           Documents, for the Crusade Global Trust No. 1 of 1999 issue of
           Notes for the period between October 1, 1999 and the end of the
           Manager's fiscal year on September 30, 2000.

     Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Note Trust Deed related to the
above-referenced issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of August 15, 2001.




                                                     /s/  G.M. Bartlett

                                                     By:      G.M. Bartlett
                                                     Title:   Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         169,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,718,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   109,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,952,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,948,000
<PP&E>                                         301,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,249,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,241,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,712,000
<COMMON>                                    10,848,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,249,000
<SALES>                                      5,355,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,355,000
<CGS>                                        4,640,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,925,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,659,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,659,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,659,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL JONOVIC.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: EDWARD MUNIZ,

Petitioner.

No. 09-1547

(D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01914-MSK-MJW)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before TACHA, BRISCOE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Edward Muniz has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court

to direct the district court to rule on his pending motion to alter the judgment, and

his pending motion for extension of time to file an appeal. Mr. Muniz asserts in

his petition that “[i]n order to continue with my appeal these motions need to be

answered.” Pet. at 1. 

Shortly before Mr. Muniz filed his mandamus petition, he filed his notice

of appeal. On December 14, 2009, we dismissed Mr. Muniz’s appeal as untimely. 

In the dismissal order, we noted that judgment was entered on August 14, 2009,

and the notice of appeal was due on or before September 14, 2009. Mr. Muniz

did not file his notice of appeal until December 4, 2009. Although he did file a

motion to alter the judgment, that motion was untimely and therefore it did not

toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. Mr. Muniz also filed a motion for

Appellate Case: 09-1547 Document: 01018363272 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 1
-2-

extension of time to file his notice of appeal, but that motion was untimely

because it was not filed within the thirty-day time period for filing a notice of

appeal. Because Mr. Muniz did not timely file his notice of appeal and there was

no basis to toll the time period for filing his appeal, we dismissed the appeal. We

noted, however, that if and when the district court ruled on his pending

post-judgment motion, he could appeal from that ruling, if he wished to do so.

On February 4, 2010, the district court denied as moot Mr. Muniz’s motion

for an extension of time to file an appeal. Although the district court has not

ruled on his motion to alter the judgment, Mr. Muniz can no longer argue that he

needs the district court to rule on that motion in order to continue with his appeal

because his appeal has been dismissed. Mr. Muniz is still free to file an appeal

from the district court’s disposition of his post-judgment motion, once the court

rules on that motion. Accordingly, we DENY as moot Mr. Muniz’s petition for a

writ of mandamus, and we DENY Mr. Muniz’s motion to proceed without

prepayment of fees. Mr. Muniz is directed to pay the filing fee immediately. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1547 Document: 01018363272 Date Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 2
# Sitemap

## May 03, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 05
- May 03, 2019

            - NASA’s Aqua Satellite Detects Many Fires in Guinea, Africa
            - NASA Scientist to Discuss “Solving the Puzzles of Planet Formation in the Modern Era of Planet-Hunting” at Library of Congress Lecture
            - Microalgae Payload Developer Team
            - Nomex Bag
            - The Heroes Behind the Heroes: Part 3
            - NASA Invites Media to Attend ‘NASA Day in Baton Rouge’ Activities May 8
            - In Case You Missed It: A Weekly Summary of Top Content from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
            - Signing Off on Algae Sample
            - Team at Cold Stowage Lab
            - Now Mars 2020 Can Phone Home
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CECILIO GARCIA.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

I, Mark Harrington, Chief Financial Officer of Dune Energy, Inc. (f/k/a IP
Factory, Inc.), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,
2002 (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dune Energy, Inc.
(f/k/a IP Factory, Inc.).

Dated: November 26, 2003

                                                 /s/ Mark Harrington
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark Harrington

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Hoover and Others *v.*Hoover and Another.

Tuesday, *November*19.

Errors in fact may be assigned in eases of wills, but the question arising on the assignment must be determined, not by a jury, but by the Court.

APPEAL from the *Marion*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Bill in chancery to set aside a will. The question as to the validity of the will was submitted to a jury. Verdict for the defendants ; and the bill dismissed.

One of the errors assigned is, that the jury have found the will to be valid, when it is not; and the appellants pray that this assignment of error may be tried by a jury. Demurrer and joinder.

The prayer annexed to this assignment of error is improper and must be struck out. The statute authorizes errors in fact *to*be assigned in cases of wills, but the questions arising on the assignment must be determined by the Court. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 204.

*183P. *Sweetser*and *H.*Brown, for the appellants.

*C. Fletcher*and *0.*Butler, for the appellees.

The question arising on the assignment of error before us, will be examined when the cause shall be submitted, and if, according to the testimony contained in the record, the error be found to exist, the judgment will be reversed, and a new trial directed in the Circuit Court.

Per *Curiam.*

The demurrer is overruled, with leave to join in error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EF10-10-000]

Take notice that on September 30, 2010, Western Area Power Administration submitted a tariff filing pursuant to its Open Access Transmission Tariff, to be effective January 25, 2010.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on November 1, 2010.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-26986 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# Make Asteroids You Can Eat

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Students

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8

## Subject

Space Science, Spanish, Solar System and Planets, Asteroids Comets Meteorites

## Type

Hands-on Activities

Asteroids are chunks of rock that never quite became full-fledged planets when the solar system formed. You can use mashed potatoes to build your own asteroids, and then bake and eat your yummy creations.

#### Make Asteroids You Can EatMake Asteroids You Can Eat (Spanish version)
#### TOWNSHIP OF EWING, ETC. v. EWING COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., ETC.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.