alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  463,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               524,920
<PP&E>                                         992,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                 765,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 764,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,820,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,181
<COMMON>                                        41,012
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,099,334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   764,021
<SALES>                                        450,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               450,666
<CGS>                                        1,406,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,247,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               820,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,201,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,201,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,201,118)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Brian D. Niebur, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB for the quarter ended March31, 2004 of Spectre Gaming, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  C) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ Brian D. Niebur   By: Brian D. Niebur Chief Financial Officer
#### Louisa M. Cousino v. Edwin Cousino et al.

*Will*— Construction—Life-estate.

A will by which the testator, after providing for the payment of his debis, bequeaths the residue of his estate to his wife, “and after her death, or sooner, if she chooses to,' to be divided among his children or their heirs, share and share alike,” conveys a life-estate to the widow.

Appeal from Wavne. (Hosmer, J.)

Argued May 13, 1891.

Decided June 5, 1891.

Bill to construe a will. Complainant appeals.

Decree affirmed.

The facts are stated in the' opinion.

*William Look,*for plaintiff, contended:

1. In construing wills, the general intention of the testator must first be fixed; citing *Jameson’s Appeal,*1 Mich. 99; *Eyer v. Beck,*70 Id. 179; *Morrison v. Sessions Estate,*Id. 297.

2. Under the provisions of the will, and the intention of the testator as gained from the whole instrument, complainant is the immediate legatee, and takes an absolute estate; citing *Jones v. Jones,*25 Mich. 401; *Proctor v. Robinson,*35 Id. 291; *Sutphen v. Ellis,*Id. 446.

*William M. Walsh,*for- defendants, contended:

1. The cases cited by complainant’s counsel have a direct applica*324tion in the construction of this will, showing the intent of the testator to have been to make some provision for his children or their heirs after the death of his wife, and are distinguished by this Court in *Schehr v. Look,*84 Mich. 263.

Grant, J.

Complainant is the executrix of her husband’s will, and filed this bill to obtain an interpretation ■ thereof. The testator, after providing for the payment of his debts, bequeathed the residue of his estate, real and personal, to complainant, and,—

*“*After her death, or sooner, if she chooses to, to be divided- among my children or their heirs, share and share alike.”

Complainant insists that the absolute title to the property, both real and personal, was by this clause vested in her. We think there can be no ambiguity as to the intent of the testator. The will conveyed only a life-estate to complainant.- If he intended to devise the absolute title to complainant, the last clause of the above provision would be meaningless.1

The decree of the court below is affirmed, the costs to be paid out of the estate.

The other Justices concurred.

1

The testator left four minor children, and his estate was appraised at 811,779.28, The complainant introduced in evidence the statements of the deceased to the effect that he had- willed his property to his wife absolutely, to do with as she liked.
(logo) Prudential 

Prudential Asset Resources

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel 214 777-4500

 

 

A business of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC 01086-120

550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:        RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C23 Period: **September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period")**

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of September 1, 2014 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

 

(i)         a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

 

(ii)        to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

 

 

 

 

Effective as of March 19, 2015

 

/s/ Hal Collet

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
EXHIBIT 31

                           CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve McKerihan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on Form 6-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Crusade Global Trust No.2
of 2001;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar,  agreements,  for  inclusion  in these  reports  is  included  in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreements and based upon my knowledge
and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and servicing,  or similar,  agreements,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Perpetual Trustees Consolidated Limited


                                           /s/  S.  McKerihan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           S.  McKerihan
                                           CFO - Crusade Management Limited
                                           Date:  March 25, 2004
#### JOSEPH MANGANI ET AL., PARTNERS, ETC., RESPONDENTS, v. STADIUM BOWLING ACADEMY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Submitted October 3, 1944

Decided December 28, 1944.

*300Before Justices Parker and Colie.

Por the appellants, *Newton H. Porter, Jr.,*and *Donald O. Hobart.*

Por the respondents, *Louis H. Hollander.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The dispute in this case is whether the delivery of a general release to the attorney of the appellants on terms that it was not to take effect until a balance claimed by the signers of the release to be due, should be paid, operated in law as an absolute delivery so as to bar a suit for such balance.

The facts of the case, shortly, stated, are that plaintiff-respondents were contractors for the erection of a building for appellant corporation, and on the final settlement there was a balance claimed by plaintiffs as unpaid, and apparently disputed by the corporate appellant. The District Court decided that there was a balance due of $406.50, and that finding is impregnable here. The argument for reversal is that plaintiffs delivered a sealed release to the attorney of defendants and that such release finally'' disposed of any dispute.

Our conclusion is to the contrary. The rule relied on by the late Vice-Chancellor Stevens, in the case of *Bowman*v. *Brown,*87 *N. J. Eq.*47; *affirmed, Id.*363, on his opinion, is that where an agent takes a deed in escrow to be delivered to his principal upon payment of a certain sum, his agency does not incapacitate him from holding the deed in escrow. The rule was reaffirmed in substance in *Kelly*v. *Chinich,*91 *Id.*97, and appears in the text of 21 *C. J.*877. A sealed release is clearly within the rule.

There was evidence in the case, and the trial court found as a fact, that there was a balance due the contractors, and by plain implication if not expressly, that plaintiffs delivered the release to the attorney' of defendant corporation on terms that it was delivered in escrow, and to be used only when the claimed balance should be paid.

The judgment will accordingly be affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 97-CA-00770-SCT

WAL-MART STORES, INC.

v.

THELMA A. HOWELL

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/11/97

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: EDLEY H. JONES, III

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: JAMES M. MARS, II

NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - PERSONAL INJURY

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 10/08/98

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED: 4/12/99

BEFORE PRATHER, C.J., BANKS AND WALLER, JJ.

WALLER, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

MEMORANDUM OPINION

¶1. Thelma Howell sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., for injuries she sustained while shopping at the Wal-Mart

Superstore in Philadelphia, Mississippi. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Howell in the amount of $25,

000.00. Wal-Mart appealed and alleges the following assignments of error:

I. WAL-MART WAS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW.

II. HOWELL FAILED TO SATISFY HER BURDEN OF PROOF AS TO DAMAGES.

III. THE JURY VERDICT WAS THE PRODUCT OF BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND

IMPROPER PASSION.

¶2. A jury question was presented where Brent Garrett, a customer in Wal-Mart at the time Howell

slipped, testified as to seeing a liquid on the floor and thereafter searching briefly for a Wal-Mart employee

prior to Howell's slipping on the light-colored liquid detergent that was on the floor. There was testimony

that Wal-Mart had 180 employees on the floor at the time of the fall, and a store policy that required each

employee to check aisles for safety hazards at least five times over a shift. However, there was no testimony

that any Wal-Mart employee had conducted a safety sweep of the aisle where Howell fell. It was further
acknowledged by a manager that the location where Howell fell was more likely to have a spill than other

departments of the store. Although this may be viewed as a somewhat close case, all conflicts in the

evidence will be resolved in the plaintiff's favor on appeal where there has been a favorable jury verdict.

Southwest Mississippi Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Lawrence, 684 So.2d 1257, 1269 (Miss.1996).

¶3. With respect to damages, Howell with no history of prior knee problems, incurred $5,089 in medical

bills from treatment that included arthroscopic knee surgery. We cannot say on the basis of the record that

the jury verdict of $25,000 was the result of prejudice, bias, fraud or is manifestly against the weight of the

evidence. Sessums v. Northtown Limousines, Inc. 664 So.2d 164, 170 (Miss.1995).

¶4. AFFIRMED.

PRATHER, C.J., SULLIVAN AND PITTMAN, P.JJ., BANKS, ROBERTS, SMITH AND

MILLS, JJ., CONCUR. McRAE, J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY.
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, J. Theodore Borter, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D

required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on

Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-GC24 (the "Exchange Act periodic

reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a

whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to

state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of

the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading

with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other

information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered

by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in

this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in

the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their

obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for

asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment

of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required

to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB

and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to

this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material

instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in

this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information

provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Primary Servicer.

 

Dated: March 30, 2015

 

 

/s/ J. Theodore Borter

Name: J. Theodore Borter, President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Wetherill and Another *v.*The Inhabitants of Congressional Township, &c., in Posey County.

The declaration in debt before a justice of the peace contained four counts, each for the sum of 62 dollars. *Held,*that the justice had no jurisdiction.

*Thursday, July*2.

ERROR to the *Posey*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

This was an action of debt commenced by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error before a justice of the peace. The statement of the plaintiffs’ cause of action contains four counts, each for the sum of sixty-two dollars. Judgment for the plaintiffs in the Court below.

Several questions are raised by the plaintiffs in error, but the only one necessary to be noticed is, whether the justice had jurisdiction of the cause. We have recently decided that each count in a declaration contains a separate cause of action, and therefore it is, that more than one count in a declaration is admissible. *Swift*v. Woods, *May*term, 1839. In assumpsit, and other actions sounding in damages, the sum laid in the conclusion of the declaration constitutes the amount of the plaintiff’s claim. But in an action of debt, the *358sum or sums sued foitconstitute the plaintiff’s demand, and the damages laid in the declaration are only intended to cover a sum sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the detention of the debt.

*J. Pitcher,*for the plaintiffs.

In the present case, the defendants were sued upon four distinct causes of action, amounting to 248 dollars, a sum to which the jurisdiction of the justice did not extend.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, with leave to the plaintiffs to amend the declaration.
usbank



Annual Statement of Compliance
Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18

VIA: EMAIL

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
Attention: Stephen Holmes
stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



Re:
Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  dated  as  of  September  1,  2014  (the  "Agreement")  between
Morgan  Stanley  Capital  I  Inc.,  as  Depositor,  Wells  Fargo  Bank,  National  Association,  as  the
Master  Servicer,  Rialto  Capital  Advisors,  LLC,  as  the  Special  Servicer,  Park  Bridge  Lender
Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee, Certificate
Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate
Administrator and Custodian, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:

(1)

A  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Certificate  Administrator  and  Custodian  during  the  preceding
calendar year (the "Reporting Period") and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator
and Custodian under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(2)

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator and Custodian
has  fulfilled  all  its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in  all  material  respects  throughout  such
Reporting Period

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


Date: March 24, 2015


U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian

By:  /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs
Kimberly O. Jacobs
Senior Vice President
# Sitemap

## August 05, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 08
- August 05, 2010

            - NASA Moves Space Station Repair Spacewalk to Saturday
            - NASA Moves Space Station Repair Spacewalk To Saturday
            - August 1st Coronal Mass Ejection
            - North Polar Layers of Mars
            - Cassini Significant Events 07/28/10 – 08/03/10