alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mooney *v.*Myers.

If in an action of replevin in a justice’s Court, the statement of demand, filed before the writ issued, state the value of the property, the omission of an averment of such value in the affidavit is not material.

The constable may retain the replevin-bond taken in such suit, until the rendition of final judgment.

*Wednesday, June*3.

ERROR to the *Cam-oil*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, *J.*

Mooney commenced an action of replevin against *Myers*before a justice of the peace. The affidavit omitted to state the value of the property replevied, but a separate cause of action, filed by the plaintiff before the writ issued, contained an" averment of its value. The return to the writ shows, that the property in controversy was taken by the officer and delivered to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff entered into bond as required by law, but the bond was not returned by the constable and filed among the papers in the case. The parties appeared before the justice at the trial, and judgment was given for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. After several continuances, the cause was dismissed by the Court and final judgment given for the defendant.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is defended on the ground, 1. That the affidavit on which the writ issued was wholly defective in not stating the value of the property; and 2. That the bond required by the statute to be given by the plaintiff was not returned to the justice.

*332
      *P.*Sweetser, for the plaintiff.

*W.*Wright, for the defendant.

The first point is not tenable, as was decided by this Court in the case of *Perkins*v. Smith, 4 Blackf. 299. The second is equally untenable.' The statute under which these proceedings were had, Rey. Code, -1831,- pp. 306, 7, does not require the bond to be returned by the constable. If *the*plaintiff do not prosecute his writ to effect, or if the defendant succeed,in his defence to the suit, it is made the duty of the constable to assign the bond to , the .defqndant, that he may commence suit thereon. Until final judgment be rendered, he may retain possession of the bond, and the nature of the judgment will determine the disposition he is to make of it.

There was no irregularity in the proceedings for which the suit should have been dismissed.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &q.'
---

## Dave Shaffer



---

Dave ShafferI was born in Montreal and graduated from Concordia University with both Bachelor's (1978) and Masters (1983) Degrees in Electrical Engineering.

I joined Spar Aerospace Ltd in Montreal in 1978 and designed state-of-the-art communication satellite receivers until 1985, when I was assigned to SPAR's Toronto Division to design the Video System for Canada's contribution to the International Space Station (ISS), the Mobile Servicing System (MSS).

I joined the Canadian Space Agency in 1994 as the Systems architect for the MSS Video and Artificial Vision  Systems.

Since 1996, I have been serving as a Senior Robotics Instructor. I am responsible for helping to develop both Astronaut and Mission Controller training courseware, and conducting Training Sessions for all Space Shuttle and ISS MSS Robotics Operators.

August 2006
# Payload Adapter Testing: A Key Step for Artemis IV Rocket’s Success

Teams at Marshall manufactured, prepared, and move the payload adapter test article. The payload adapter will undergo testing in the same test stand that once housed the SLS liquid oxygen tank structural test article.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/nasa-msfc-031324-pla-move-test-stand-install-8/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASASize3931x6985pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 21, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7215

LASHAWN GILL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 00709

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : February 22 , 2018 Decided: February 26, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lashawn M. Gill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lashawn Gill seeks to appeal the dis trict court’s order s d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c )(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dis trict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
W e have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document

HEI Exhibit 4.1




AMENDMENT 2020-1 TO THE 
HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN




This Amendment 2020-1 is intended to correct an “Operational Failure,” as defined in Section 5.01(2)(b) of Revenue Procedure 2018-52 (now Revenue Procedure 2019-19), which sets forth the rules and requirements of the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System.  On December 28, 2018, the proposed correction was submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) under the Voluntary Correction Program.  The correction was approved by the Service in a Compliance Statement dated February 19, 2020.


Effective June 8, 2018, the following is added at the end of Section 4.3(e)(viii) of the Plan (as the Plan read prior to Amendment 2019-1):


The restrictions imposed by this paragraph have not been applied to Participants and Beneficiaries who directed investment exchanges/transfers using the Trustee’s auto-rebalance feature.  Investment exchanges/transfers made in violation of these restrictions from October 17, 2008 through June 8, 2018 are grandfathered.  This means that Participants and Beneficiaries who were able to make exchanges/transfers in excess of what is permitted by these restrictions will not be required to reduce their holdings in the Company Stock Fund.  Effective June 8, 2018, the restrictions are re-imposed on all investment exchanges/transfers.


TO RECORD the adoption of this Amendment 2020-1, the Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. Pension Investment Committee has executed this document March 13, 2020.






						
		HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. 
		PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
		By_/s/ Kurt K. Murao____________________

		   Its Secretary
# Japanese Experiment Module arrival

Several components for delivery to the International Space Station sit in test stands inside the Space Station Processing Facility highbay. To the right, from back to front, are the Japanese Experiment Module, the Raffaello multi-purpose logistics module, and the European Space Agency's Columbus scientific research module. To the left in front is the starboard truss segment S5. Behind it is the test stand that will hold the Experiment Logistics Module Pressurized Section for the Japanese Experiment Module. The logistics module is one of the components of the Japanese Experiment Module or JEM, also known as Kibo, which means "hope" in Japanese. Kibo comprises six components: two research facilities -- the Pressurized Module and Exposed Facility; a Logistics Module attached to each of them; a Remote Manipulator System; and an Inter-Orbit Communication System unit. Kibo also has a scientific airlock through which experiments are transferred and exposed to the external environment of space. Kibo is Japan's first human space facility and its primary contribution to the station. Kibo will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment in which astronauts can conduct science experiments. The various components of JEM will be assembled in space over the course of three Space Shuttle missions. The first of those three missions, STS-123, will carry the Experiment Logistics Module Pressurized Section aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavour, targeted for launch in 2007. 

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-07pd-0735/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMarch 29, 2007ProducerKSCImage CreditNASASize1920x1276pxPIA NumberKSC-07PD-0735The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 12, 2010 (75 FR 63144-63145), the U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights announced a business meeting to be held on Friday, 
October 22, 2010 at the Commission's headquarters. On Monday, October 
18, 2010, the meeting was cancelled. The decision to cancel the meeting 
was too close in time to the date and time of the meeting for the 
publication of a cancellation notice to appear in advance of the 
scheduled meeting date. The details of the cancelled meeting are:

Date and Time: Friday, October 22, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

Place: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Program Planning.
    <bullet> Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report.
    <bullet> Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing 
Report on English-Only in the Workplace.
    <bullet> Consideration of Policy on Commissioner Statements and 
Rebuttals.
    <bullet> Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College 
Admissions--Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in 
closed session.
    <bullet> Update on Clearinghouse Project.
III. State Advisory Committee Issues.
    <bullet> Kentucky SAC.
    <bullet> Maryland SAC.
    <bullet> Vermont SAC.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Announcements.
VI. Approval of Minutes of October 8 Meeting.
VII. Adjourn.

Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: October 19, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-26751 Filed 10-19-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 30, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    CHIU M. CHAN    
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer



This certification is made solely
pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for any other purpose.
### Opinion issued September 15 , 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— 

### NO. 01
- 15
- 00114
- CV

——————————— CHRISTINA LIVINGSTON , Appella nt

V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION FA NNIE MAE , Appell e e
On Appeal from the Co unty C ivil C our t at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1055552



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Christina Livingston , has filed an appeal from the trial court’s January 26, 2015 judgment . The trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record on March 30, 2 015, and the reporter’s record was filed on May 19, 2015 . Appellant’s brief was therefore due on June 18, 2015

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a).2

As of June 24 , 2015, appellant failed to timely file a brief, and on that date the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that failure to file a brief or a motion for extension by July 6 , 2015 , could lead to dismissal of the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( a), 42.3(b). To date, no brief has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.



### PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown



### .
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD,

a/k/a Christopher Mitchell, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

R. WILEY, ADX Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-1390

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-01149-WYD)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1390 Document: 01018384473 Date Filed: 03/15/2010 Page: 1
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The  accompanying  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     registrant.


Date:  August 6, 2003                            By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV,
L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas,
the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their
knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Registrant.



| |  | November 12, 2003
| |  | -----------------

| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                             
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | Dennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive  
| |  |    |  | Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,                
| |  |    |  | General Partner of the Registrant               
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | /s/ John Kallas                                 
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | John Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos  
| |  |    |  | Capital Corp., General Partner of the Registrant

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
        32.2**
  
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Josie
        Ben Rubi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
        his
        knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        OCTuS, Inc., and will be retained by OCTuS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
                      Josie Ben
                      RubiChief
                      Financial
                      OfficerNovember
                      15,
                      2007
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of London Pacific Group Limited
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  March  31,  2003 as  filed  with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief
Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1)  The   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  fully   complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  May 15, 2003                              By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer