alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

The undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial conditions and results of operations of  SI DiamondTechnology, Inc.

 

| Date:      August 9, 2002 |                 /s/ Marc W.Eller                              Marc W. Eller Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32**

**Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patterson Companies, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 28, 2012, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Scott P. Anderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and R. Stephen Armstrong, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge: 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

/s/ Scott P.Anderson                                                    

Scott P. Anderson 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

March 8, 2012 

/s/ R. StephenArmstrong                                            

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial 

Officer and Treasurer 

March 8, 2012
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2024

NO. 03-22-00781-CV

WC 4th and Colorado, LP, Appellant

v.

Colorado Third Street, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order to release funds signed by the trial court on December 8, 2021,

the order to dismiss certain claims with prejudice signed by the trial court on March 21, 2022,

and the severance order signed by the trial court on September 20, 2022. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the court’s

orders. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s orders and remands the case to the trial 

court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion. Appellee shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certificate of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Douglas P. Baker, certify that:

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Nano-Proprietary, Inc.(“NNPP”);

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all materialrespects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NNPP as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.

4.             NNPP’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inthe Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for NNPP and have:

a.                Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to NNPP, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                Evaluated the effectiveness ofNNPP’s disclosure control’s and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.                Disclosed in this report anychange in NNPP’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during NNPP’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NNPP’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             NNPP’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to NNPP’s auditors and the audit committee of NNPP’s board of directors:

a.                All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect NNPP’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in NNPP’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:    October 30, 2003 

/s/ Douglas P.Baker                                 Douglas P. BakerChief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT QUIGG.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## March 24, 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- 03
- March 24, 2023

            - Working on Artemis II
            - Astronaut Bruce McCandless Tests New Technology on Historic Spacewalk
            - NASA’s Webb Telescope Receives Michael Collins Trophy
            - NASA Invites Media to See Mars Habitat Before Crew Enters for One Year
            - Faces of Technology – Meet Ali Guarneros Luna
            - Space Station Science Highlights: Week of March 20, 2023
            - NASA Coverage Set for Uncrewed Soyuz Undocking, Departure
            - Impact Story: Navigation Doppler Lidar
            - NASA’s Dragonfly Team Soars through Major Design Review
            - NASA Prepares for Historic Asteroid Sample Delivery on Sept. 24
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (“PESI”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Dr. Louis F. Centofanti, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
November 6, 2009




/s/ Louis F. CentofantiDr.
      Louis F. CentofantiPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,
and not for any other purpose.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**Section
      1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer**









In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Douglas P, Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.     The information contained in this Report
      fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
      the
      report.









Date: 
                October 28, 2005
            /s/ Douglas P.
                Baker
              Douglas
                P. Baker
              Chief
                Financial Officer
#### KERI GRIMM v. DELBERT LONG, M.D.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Deep Space Station 14

Deep Space Network, Deep Space Station 14, a 230-foot-wide antenna at Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in Barstow, California.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/goldstone-dss14-07/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASASize1148x1119pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
___________ No. 95-3183

___________ Robert Calia, * * Appellant, * * v. * * James A. Gammon; Teresa * Thornburg; Tom Anderson; Jill * McGuire; Burl McClanahan; * Waheed Jawadi, * * Appellees. *

___________ Appeals from the United States No. 95-3184 District Court for the

___________ Eastern District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED] Gerald Moise, * * Appellant, * * v. * * James A. Gammon; Teresa * Thornburg; Tom Anderson; Jill * McGuire; Burl McClanahan; * Waheed Jawadi, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 2, 1996 Filed: July 30, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

### The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United State s 1 

### District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. PER CURIAM. In this consolidated appeal, Missouri inmates Gerald Moise and Robert Calia appe al from the district court's two grants of summary judgment in 1 favor of defendant pr ison officials in Moise and Calia's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 act ion, and from the court's denial of their motion to amend thei r complaint. We affirm.

We re view de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment
. See Beyerbach v. Sears , 49 F.3d 1324, 1325 (8th Cir. 1995). We agree with the d istrict court that appellants' conditions-of-confinement claim fo r injunctive and declaratory relief was moot due t o the inmates' transfer to a different facility. See Martin v. Sargent , 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir
. 1985). We reject appellants' contention that th eir claims are "capable of repetition, yet evadi ng review," because they have not demonstrated there exists a "reasonable expectation" that they will again be subject to the same ac tion, or that any such repeated exposure would be of too short a dur ation to permit litigation. See Murphy v. Hunt , 455 U.S. 478, 48 2 (1982) (per curiam); McFarlin v. Newport Special Sch. Dist. , 980 F.2d 1208 , 1211 (8th Cir. 1992). Thus, the district court properly granted summary judgment on appellants' conditions-of-confinement claim. We further rejec t appellants' contention that the court abused its discretion in denying the m leave to amend their complaint. We also find summary judgment was proper on Moise's claim that he was placed in administrative segregation without a finding of guilt. Moise di d not allege that any d efendant was personally involved in or actually knew of the unlawful place ment. See Givens v. Jones , 900 F.2d 1229, 1233 (8th Cir. 1990); McDowell v. Jones , 990 F.2d 433, 435 (8th Cir. 1993).

### -3- The judgment is affirmed.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 31.1
Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos GlobalIncome Fund XIV, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

d0324

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

146832(41)

GREENBROOKE PARKHOMES

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146832

COA: 305985

Oakland CC: 2011-116499-CH

KATHY L. THOMAS,

Defendant,

and

MIDFIRST BANK,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

30, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to

                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Downey Bridgwater, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 13, 2002                    /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          J. Downey Bridgwater
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christian Soderquist certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OCTuS, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS Inc.





Date: May 24, 2010


/s/ Christian SoderquistChristian Soderquist

Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL A. CARTER.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## February 21, 2017

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2017
- 02
- February 21, 2017

            - CU Boulder students show NASA their vision of future space transport
            - Media Invited to NASA Events Spotlighting Partnerships with Small Business, Minority Colleges
            - U.S. Navy to Conduct Carrier Landing Practice at Wallops
            - NASA’s Fermi Finds Possible Dark Matter Ties in Andromeda Galaxy
            - 10 Years Strong with NASA’s THEMIS Mission
            - Obstacles and Wakes in Lava
            - A New Crater on a Dusty Slope
            - Bethany Ehlmann – Early Mars: A View from Rovers and Orbiters
            - Bethany Ehlmann – Early Mars: A View from Rovers and Orbiters
            - Bethany Ehlmann – Early Mars: A View from Rovers and Orbiters
#### ROBERT CLOWES v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification granted.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWIN B. BORISON.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-4.55





 Exhibit 4.55 

CONFIRMATION LETTER 
 As a shareholder of
Beijing Perfect Match Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), I hereby confirm, represent and guarantee that my successor, guardian, creditor, spouse or any other person that may be entitled to assume rights and interests in the
equity interest of the Company held by myself upon death, incapacity, divorce or any circumstances that may affect my ability to exercise my shareholder’s rights in Company will not, in any manner and in any circumstances, carry out any act
that may affect or hinder the fulfillment of my obligations under each of the contractual agreements (including the Equity Interest Pledge Agreement, the Power of Attorney, Exclusive Option Agreement which were executed by myself on June 1,
2019, as well as the Exclusive Technical Consulting and Management Services Agreement and the Business Operation Agreement which were executed by myself on June 1, 2019) (the “Contractual Agreements”). I further confirm and
undertake that the Contractual Agreements and all of my rights and obligations thereunder shall be equally effective and binding upon my heir and successor. 

I hereby further covenant that, I shall unwind the Contractual Agreements as soon as the applicable laws of the People’s Republic of China
(“PRC”) allow Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. to operate the business operated by the Company (which includes but not limited to the business of Network Information Service) without the Contractual Agreements. Subject
to the applicable PRC laws, I shall return to the Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. or the entity designated by Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. any consideration I receive from Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd.
for its acquisition of the equity interest of Company at the time when the Contractual Agreements are terminated. 
  

			
	Min Liu
		
	By:	 	/s/ Min Liu
	
	June 1, 2019
# KSC-2010-2583

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla.  - Space shuttle Discovery majestically begins its ascent into the predawn sky at Launch Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.  Shuttle Discovery lifted off at 6:21 a.m. EDT on April 5, 2010. The seven-member STS-131 crew will deliver the multi-purpose logistics module Leonardo, filled with supplies, a new crew sleeping quarters and science racks that will be transferred to the International Space Station's laboratories. The crew also will switch out a gyroscope on the station’s truss, install a spare ammonia storage tank and retrieve a Japanese experiment from the station’s exterior. STS-131 is the 33rd shuttle mission to the station and the 131st shuttle mission overall. For information on the STS-131 mission and crew, visit http:__www.nasa.gov_mission_pages_shuttle_shuttlemissions_sts131_index.html. Photo credit: NASA_Sandra Joseph and Kevin O'Connell

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-2010-2583/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 5, 2010ProducerKSCImage CreditNASA_Sandra Joseph and Kevin O'ConnellSize1277x1920pxPIA Number2010-2583The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 20, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman