alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,621,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              119,407,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,417,719
<INVENTORY>                                 28,637,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           155,697,487
<PP&E>                                      37,490,956
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,988,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,445,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       71,938,274
<BONDS>                                     47,167,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    68,089,648
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,153,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,445,622
<SALES>                                    109,376,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,376,190
<CGS>                                       73,420,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,420,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,085,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               312,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             742,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,184,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,274,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,910,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,910,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES PRE-TAX NON-RECURRING CHARGES OF $1.5 MILLION, RELATED TO A FIRE IN A
BRANCH OFFICE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY AND THE CLOSING OF A WAREHOUSE AND
EMBROIDERY OPERATION IN CALIFORNIA.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Shadow of the Apollo 11 Lunar module silhouetted against Moon’s surface

AS11-37-5475 (20 July 1969) --- The black shadow of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module (LM) is silhouetted against the surface of the moon in this photograph taken from inside the LM. The lunar surface extravehicular activity (EVA) of astronauts Neil A. Armstrong and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. was conducted on July 20, 1969. Impressions in the lunar soil made by the lunar boots of the two astronauts are clearly visible.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-as11-37-5475/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 20, 1969ProducerJSCSize1920x1920pxPIA Numberas11-37-5475The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 28, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Cosmonaut Yury Usachev worls aboard the Zvezda Service Module

ISS002-E-5035 (March 2001) --- Cosmonaut Yury V. Usachev of Rosaviakosmos, Expedition Two commander, floats onboard the Zvezda Service Module. Usachev and two NASA astronauts recently took over residency on the orbital outpost from the initial station crew, who had been onboard since early November 2000.  The image was recorded with a digital still camera.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss002e5035-9495245115-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize3060x2036pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 29, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### Roberts *v.*Mitchell *et al.*

No. 6244.

June 12, 1928.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Pomeroy. Fulton superior court. August 15, 1927.

*Bay & Bay,*for plaintiffs.

*Mitchell & Mitchell,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

1. “Courts of equity shall have authority to appoint receivers to take possession of and protect trust or joint property and funds, whenever the danger of destruction and loss shall require such interference.” Civil Code (1910), § 5476.

2. “The power of appointing receivers and ordering injunctions should be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” Civil Code (1910), § 5477.

3. Under the pleadings and evidence in this case the judge did not err in refusing the appointment of a receiver.

*Judgment affin-med.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Larry A. Goldstone               
|Larry A. Goldstone                   
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|November 8, 2006
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)   In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MONTAVO, INC. (the Company) for the
period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brook W. Lang, as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and  (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 15,
2011 By: /s/
Brook W. Lang Brook
W. Lang Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer     This certification
accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.4




AMENDMENT TO THE 
ITT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED


This amendment is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ITT Inc. (the “Company”). 


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated (the “Plan”); 


WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, no deferral elections are in effect under the Plan for compensation that would otherwise be payable in 2020 or any subsequent year;


WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the Plan to provide that no director may elect to defer cash director fees earned, and no additional directors shall become eligible to participate in the Plan, on and after January 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”); and


WHEREAS, Section 6.01 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by the Board; provided, however, that no amendment shall reduce a participant’s accrued benefit.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:


		
	1.
	The following Section 2.01(c) is added to the Plan:  “Effective as of January 1, 2020, the Plan is frozen.  No individual may become a participant in the Plan, and no participant may elect to defer any Director Fees earned, on or after January 1, 2020; provided, however, that any election to defer any Director Fees earned prior to January 1, 2020, shall remain in full force and effect.”




		
	2.
	The following sentence is added at the end of Section 2.02(a): “Notwithstanding any provisions of the Plan to the contrary, effective January 1, 2020, no additional individuals shall become eligible to participate in the Plan.” 




		
	3.
	The following sentences are added at the end of Section 3.01(a): “Notwithstanding any provisions of the Plan to the contrary, effective January 1, 2020, no Director Fees earned in a Service Year that begins on or after January 1, 2020, shall be deferred under the Plan.  Accordingly, any election to defer Director Fees earned in a Service Year that begins on or after January 1, 2020, shall have no force or effect.  Any election to defer Director Fees earned prior to January 1, 2020, shall remain in full force and effect.”




[Signature Page Follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date below.


By:  /s/ Maurine Lembesis           
Name:  Maurine Lembesis
Title:   Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
# STS-66 Official pre-flight crew portrait

STS066-S-002 (September 1994) --- These five NASA astronauts and one European Space Agency (ESA) crew member are in training for the 13th flight of the Space Shuttle Atlantis.  Donald R. McMonagle (front right) is mission commander, and Curtis L. Brown, Jr. (front center) is pilot. The other crew members are Ellen S. Ochoa, payload commander; Scott E. Parazynski, (rear left) and Joseph R. Tanner (rear center), mission specialists, along with ESA astronaut Jean-François Clervoy (front left), mission specialist. Clervoy, Parazynski and Tanner, members of the 1992 astronaut class, are making their initial flights in space.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts066-s-002/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 1, 1994ProducerJSCSize1920x1536pxPIA NumberSTS066-S-002The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 11, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Matthews , No. 6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1 (W.D.

Va. May 1, 2008; Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 849 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 849

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors Access to 
Medicare Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 849

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.
```
- ODEO Home
- ODEO Organization
- File a Complaint   - Complaint eFile
  - Complaint Process
- ODEO Mission
- Diversity & Inclusion
- More   - No Fear Act  							Complaints Management Division						
						Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity					
  ODEO’s Complaints Management Division (CMD) is the NASA organization that handles EEO concerns raised by members of the Agency’s 17,000-strong workforce and advances civil rights efforts of Agency grantees, such as universities and science centers nationwide. The division has two primary areas of responsibility. These involve managing and implementing Agency wide policies and systems for 1) processing, adjudicating and resolving EEO complaints (this includes oversight of the informal complaints process conducted at the NASA Centers and the Agency’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program); and 2) developing internal (NASA workforce) and external (NASA grant recipient institutions) policies, programs and initiatives, including executive leadership, guidance, technical assistance, and compliance related activities.    **EEO Complaints and Alternative Dispute Resolution**  The EEO Complaints Office manages and implements Agency-wide policies and systems for processing, adjudicating and resolving individual and class discrimination complaints.  This includes oversight of the informal complaints process conducted at the NASA Centers.   The three major functions of this division are:    - EEO Complaints Policy and Processing   	Implements policy and provides oversight and guidance for the processing of individual and class complaints pursuant to Title VII.
  - **Investigations, Hearings, Final Agency Actions**  	Conducts all equal employment opportunity (EEO) investigations, facilitates hearing and issues Final Agency Actions.
  - **Appeals and Compliance**   Facilitates appeals and responsible for tracking compliance of settlement agreements and orders issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Final Agency Actions.        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Oct 24, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Garrett Shea								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Sitemap

## May 14, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 05
- May 14, 2019

            - The Earth’s limb during a starry night pass
            - NASA Awards $106 Million to US Small Businesses for Technology Development
            - Student Winners Spark MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE Innovations With NASA OPSPARC 2019
            - NASA astronaut Christina Koch stows frozen science samples
            - NASA astronaut Christina Koch conducts research for the Kidney Cells investigation
            - NASA astronaut Christina Koch conducts research for the Kidney Cells investigation
            - NASA astronaut Nick Hague works on the Genes In Space-6 experiment
            - Astronaut David Saint-Jacques works on the Combustion Integrated Rack
            - Mission-Saving NASA Instrument Secures New Flight Opportunity;  Slated for Significant Upgrade
            - NASA Scientist Receives Patent for Innovative Technique for Measuring Space Weather Phenomena
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000096

12-JAN-2016

09:33 AM
#### Marvin SPIRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James L. BOTTORFF, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14445.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

May 14, 1964.

*180Marvin Spires, in pro. per.

Robert G. Bottorff, Jeffersonville, Ind., Richard C. O’Connor, New Albany, Ind., Owen Voigt, Jeffersonville, Ind., for defendant-appellee, Orbison, Rudy & O’Connor, New Albany, Ind., of counsel.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, appeals from an adverse judgment in a civil rights action against an Indiana public official.

This court on May 3, 1963, reversed a judgment denying plaintiff leave to prosecute his suit for damages, and remanded the cause for further proceeding. Spires v. Bottorff, 317 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1963). On remand, the complaint was filed and issues joined. Plaintiff was produced for trial under a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. Witnesses were heard, and the district court, without a jury, found adversely to plaintiff on his claims that defendant Bottorff’s letter to the warden of the penitentiary, and defendant Bottorff’s alleged prejudicial interference in plaintiff’s coram nobis action in the Clark County Circuit Court, had violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Spires v. Bottorff, 223 F.Supp. 441 (S.D.Ind.1963).

We have read the district court opinion and are satisfied there was no merit in the contentions made here by plaintiff, that the district court disregarded the “uncontradicted testimony” of witness Kage, and that the testimony of witness Baker proved Bottorff’s interference in the coram nobis proceeding. Both contentions involve questions of fact upon which the district court made findings, including considerations of credibility, which have substantial basis in the evidence and are not erroneous. We have no definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. American Glass Co. v. Michigan Mut. Liab. Co., 327 F.2d 776 (7th Cir. 1964), Footlik v. United States, 323 F.2d 635 (7th Cir., 1963).

For the reasons given, the judgment upon the findings is not error and is affirmed.