alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN THE MATTER OF LORENZO D. GILLIAM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Argued March 3, 1987

Decided May 1, 1987.

*David E. Johnson, Jr.,*Director, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

*Frederick W. Hardt*argued the cause for respondent *(Sever & Hardt,*attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) that respondent be disbarred for knowing misappropriations of clients’ funds. Respondent has admitted the misappropriations but contended before the DRB that alcoholism, which contributed to cause the misconduct, should mitigate the sanction of disbarment otherwise required by *In re Wilson,*81 *N.J.*451 (1979). Respondent recognizes that the record before us does not establish an impairment of comprehension, competency or will sufficient to *538excuse the misconduct under the standards of *In re Hein,*104 *N.J.*297 (1986). For now, we shall continue to invoke the *Wilson*sanction. But as we said in *Hein, supra,*104 *N.J.*at 305, “[w]e do not completely close the door” on the possibility that better understanding of this problem and better programs will commend another course for attorneys in respondent’s situation.

The decision is that respondent be disbarred.

Respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

ORDER

It is ORDERED that LORENZO D. GILLIAM of MT. HOLLY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that LORENZO D. GILLIAM be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

*For*disbarment—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN-7.

Opposed—None.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVE SALVATIORE BRANA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-558

[November 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 43-1997-CF001324C.

Steve Salvatiore Brana, Century, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Blueprint Neurotherapeutics.
    Date: December 2, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Ernest W. Lyons, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529. 301-496-4056. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6baafb9b8a5b396b8bfb8b2a5f8b8bfbef8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c504553524f597c525552584f12525554125b534a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 18, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26932 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX‐35.11 

 
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue 31st Floor, 

New York, NY 10179

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Las Catalinas Mall Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 20, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor,  WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer,  WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, relating to the series JPM 2014-C22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  relating to the Las Catalinas Mall Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the series JPM 2014-C23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction. 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 6, 2005.



/s/ James C. FloresJames C. FloresChief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,446
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,914
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     85,644
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             327
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               327
<LOANS>                                        236,711
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,926
<DEPOSITS>                                     283,899
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,090
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,656
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,199
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 352,926
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,845
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,140
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   487
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,472
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,413
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,805
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,667
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       23
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  41
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (41)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (41)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (27)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Justin Bryan Bell, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 26444A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00271

- CR * October 31 , 2017

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey , J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has insp ected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment s below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment s of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 957 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 957

  To require that State and local law enforcement agencies conform to 
   Federal guidelines in using cell simulator devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

   Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Mr. Poe of Texas, and Mr. Farenthold) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that State and local law enforcement agencies conform to 
   Federal guidelines in using cell simulator devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fourth Amendment Integrity 
Restoration in Surveillance Act of 2017'' or as the ``F.A.I.R. 
Surveillance Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CELL SIMULATOR DEVICES BY STATE AND LOCAL LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT.

    In the case of any coordination or agreement between a Federal 
agency and a State or local law enforcement agency pertaining to the 
acquisition or use by that State or local law enforcement Agency of any 
cell simulator device, such coordination or agreement shall require 
that such use, at minimum, conform to the guidance and policies that 
apply to the Federal agency on the use of such a device.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    Any agreement as referenced in section 2 that is in effect at the 
date of enactment of this Act shall be renewed within a year of the 
date of enactment.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the term ``cell simulator device'' means any device 
that simulates cellular facilities for the provision of electronic 
communication service (as such term is defined in section 2510 of title 
18, United States Code) or any device that locates cellular devices or 
their unique identifiers by functioning as a cell tower.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-1-000; Docket No. PR11-2-000; Docket No. PR11-3-000]


Notice of Baseline Filings

October 14, 2010.

Cranberry Pipeline             Docket No. PR11-1-000
 Corporation.
New Mexico Gas Company, Inc..  Docket No. PR11-2-000
Peoples Natural Gas Company    Docket No. PR11-3-000
 LLC.
                               (Not Consolidated)
 

    Take notice that on October 8, 2010, and October 13, 2010, 
respectively the applicants listed above submitted their baseline 
filing of its Statement of Operating Conditions for services provided 
under section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df999a8d9c90b1b3b6b1ba8caaafafb0adab9fb9baadbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, October 25, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26482 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 95-3437

 

CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee *

* Appeal from the United States

vs. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota

JOHN E. MATICH, doing business * 

as Wagon Wheel Saloon * [UNPUBLISHED]

 * 

Defendant *

*

TORY SJODIN *

*

Movant - Appellant *

 

No. 95-3475

 

CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee *

* Appeal from the United States

vs. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota

JOHN E. MATICH, doing business *

as Wagon Wheel Saloon *

*

Defendant - Appellant *

*

MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITERS *

ASSOCIATION *

*

Intervenor - Appellant *

*

 
 The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, Senior United States *

District Judge for the Western Division of the District of South

Dakota, sitting by designation.

 The Honorable Donald A. Alsop, United States District Court 1

Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

Submitted: June 10, 1996

 Filed: July 5, 1996

 

Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, Senior District *

Judge.

 

PER CURIAM.

John Matich (Matich) appeals the district court's order denying 1

his motion to vacate a default judgment granted against him and in favor

of Capitol Indemnity Corporation (Capitol). Capitol had filed a

declaratory judgment action urging its comprehensive general liability

policy issued to Matich did not provide coverage for an action brought

against Matich by Troy Sjodin (Sjodin). Sjodin and the Minnesota Joint

Underwriting Association (MJUA) appeal the district court's order

denying their motions to vacate and motions to intervene. In denying

all motions to vacate the default, the district court found no

likelihood of success on the merits because an assault and battery

exclusion precludes coverage.

Having reviewed the parties' briefs and submissions, we conclude

the finding of the district court on the issue of coverage was correct. 

Accordingly, based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the district court,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# STS-109 landing view

STS109-S-016 (12 March 2002)--- The Space Shuttle Columbia, with its crew of seven astronauts on board, approaches touchdown on Runway 33 of the KSC Shuttle Landing Facility, completing mission STS-109 to service the Hubble Space Telescope. Wheel stop occurred on orbit 165 at 4:33:09 a.m. EST with mission elapsed time of 10 days, 22 hours, 11 minutes. Main gear touchdown occurred at 4:31:52 a.m. and nose wheel touchdown an 4:32:02. It was the 58th landing at KSC out of 108 missions in the history of the Shuttle program.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts109-s-016/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMarch 12, 2002ProducerJSCSize1920x1266pxPIA Numbersts109-s-016The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 03, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 12327
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TARA LYNN ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr

- 00193

- KD

- B

- 11

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-12327 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 01/18/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 12327

Before WILSON, JORDAN, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Arthur Madden, appointed counsel for Tara Lynn Robinson in this appeal following the district court’s revocation of supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to And ers v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record revealsthat counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit , counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and the revocation of Robinson’s supervised release and her new revocation sentence are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 23-12327 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 01/18/2024 Page: 2 of 2