alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sitemap

## February 07, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 02
- February 07, 2016

            - X-24B Lifting Body
# Earth observations taken during the STS-103 mission

STS103-501-104 (19-27 December 1999) ---  One of the astronauts aboard the Earth-orbiting Space Shuttle Discovery used a handheld large format camera to photograph this scene which stretches from the Gulf of Mexico into Oklahoma.   Parts of Louisiana and Arkansas are also visible in the frame. The Red River snakes its way through the East Texas Piney Woods (center). The river meets with the southern edge of the Ouachita folded mountains of southern Oklahoma.  The white, linear feature north of the Red River is most likely a jet stream cloud, according to Earth scientists who studied the STS-103 collection at the Johnson Space Center (JSC).  Jet contrails can be seen flying over the clouds.  Along the Texas Gulf Coast are Galveston Bay and the greater Houston  metropolitan area.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts103-501-104/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenDecember 24, 1999ProducerJSCSize1239x1536pxPIA NumberSTS103-501-104The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 11, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8179

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RONALD A. SMITH, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:06-cr-00050-JBF-FBS) 

Submitted: June 9, 2009 Decided: July 9, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ronald A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Mark Salsbury, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Blair C. Perez, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ronald A. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s 

motion for a certificate of appealability and his motion for 

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,213,396
<SECURITIES>                                   181,333
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,901
<INVENTORY>                                  1,144,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,294,170
<PP&E>                                         986,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 588,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,878,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          693,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,521
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,878,196
<SALES>                                      1,475,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,348
<CGS>                                          924,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  685,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        


</TABLE>
# St. Tammany feasibility study receives additional time, funding

**NEW ORLEANS –**  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District, received an exemption for additional time and funding for the St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana Feasibility Study to further refine the Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) identified in 2021.

 

The TSP recommended approximately 14 miles of levees and 2 miles of floodwall in Slidell, clearing and snagging of Bayou Patassat, channel improvements in Mile Branch, and elevations and floodproofing for approximately 8,500 structures located in the 50-year flood plain at an estimated total cost of $4 billion.

 

The exemption provides the study with an additional 16 months and $1.77 million to further optimize efficiency and design of the recommended levee alignment, including segments along Military Road, and Big Branch Wildlife Refuge to optimize risk reduction in the area and reduce impacts to the refuge.

 

The exemption also requires another public review period in the summer of 2023 with the final report submitted in a Chief’s Report in spring of 2024.

 

The goal of the St. Tammany Parish Study is to develop alternatives to reduce flood damages caused by hurricane and rainfall events. The study was initiated in January 2020 following execution of the Feasibility Cost Share agreement with the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board and is fully federally funded, including the exemption, by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018.

 

For more information on the St. Tammany, Louisiana Feasibility Study visit: https://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/About/Projects/BBA-2018/studies/St-Tammany/

 

 

###

**Contact**

Release no. 22-016

St. Tammany

funding
Exhibit












Exhibit 10.1


IDACORP, Inc. and/or Idaho Power Company Executive Officers
with Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreements
(as of April 30, 2020)
	
					
	Name
	 
	Title
	 
	Date of Agreement

	Ryan Adelman*
	 
	Vice President, Transmission & Distribution Engineering and Construction of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Darrel T. Anderson
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/23/2008

	Brian R. Buckham*
	 
	Senior Vice President and General Counsel of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	4/4/2016

	Sarah E. Griffin*
	 
	Vice President, Human Resources of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Lisa A. Grow
	 
	President of Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/12/2008

	James Bo D. Hanchey*
	 
	Vice President, Customer Operations and Chief Safety Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Tom Harvey*
	 
	Vice President of Power Supply of Idaho Power Company
	 
	3/10/2020

	Steven R. Keen
	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/30/2008

	Jeffrey L. Malmen
	 
	Senior Vice President of Public Affairs of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/8/2008

	Kenneth W. Petersen*
	 
	Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	5/20/2010

	Adam Richins*
	 
	Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	2/8/2017




*Change in control agreement does not include 13th-month trigger or tax gross-up provisions.
---

## Matthew Kay



---

Journal Contributor Matt Kay  writes:

I have always had a passion for the history of manned spaceflight eversince, as a four year old, I was taken outside by mother in July 1969 towave to the 'man in the moon'.

Matt KayI am currently an IT specialist for an Australian bank calledSuncorp-Metway.  Prior to this, I worked in the mining industry as ageophysicist where I was tasked with applying geophysical methods to helpidentify undiscovered mineral deposits.  I also worked as a researchofficer at the University of Queensland where I specialised in thedevelopment of quantative geological models that were based on geophysicaland conventional datasets.  My research can viewed online.

I think that the ALSJ is a wonderful resource and Eric Jones and his teamdeserve to be warmly congratulated for establishing and maintaining it.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 444 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 444

   Encouraging the courts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland to allow Charles William Gard and Constance Rhoda 
      Keely Yates to pursue innovative medical care for their son.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2017

Mr. King of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Encouraging the courts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland to allow Charles William Gard and Constance Rhoda 
      Keely Yates to pursue innovative medical care for their son.

Whereas human life is sacred and deserving of care and preservation at all 
        stages of development;
Whereas a baby is not a statistic to be managed but rather a life, to be 
        supported in every way possible;
Whereas an experimental treatment exists in the United States that could prolong 
        the life of Charles Matthew William Gard (``Charlie'');
Whereas a hospital in the United States has offered to admit Charlie for such 
        treatment;
Whereas President Donald J. Trump, moved by Charlie's struggle, has extended a 
        hand of help to his parents from the United States; and
Whereas parents retain an inherent right to protect and provide for their 
        children, and to seek out all resources and services available to secure 
        life-saving treatments, wherever they may be found, for their children: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the courts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain 
and Northern Island and the European Court of Human Rights should allow 
Charles William Gard and Constance Rhoda Keely Yates to pursue 
innovative medical care for their son, Charles Matthew William Gard 
(``Charlie''), in any country where such care may be available, in 
order to give Charlie the chance to be cured in accordance with his 
parents' wishes.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**Section
      1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer**









In connection with the quarterly report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      R.D. Burck, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.     The information contained in this Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
      the
      report.








Date:      
                November 6, 2006
            /s/ R.D. Burck
              R.D.
                Burck
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  May 15, 2008                              By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
# Mercury Spacecraft Control Panels

from Project Mercury IndoctrinationMay 1959

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/mercury3/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1324x992pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 04, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/670,250, entitled “Obstetrics Simulation and Training Method and System,” filed January 22, 2010. Foreign rights are also available for licensing (PCT/US2008/076725). The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights to this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention relates generally to an obstetrics simulation system. An embodiment of the invention provides an obstetrics simulation system compromising an articulating maternal birthing simulator that is a full size and full body female having an intubeable airway with a chest rise component, a forearm having a medication receiving component, and/or a fetal heart sound component. Additionally, the maternal birthing simulator includes a head descent and cervical dilation monitor, a placenta positionable in at least two locations, two or more removable dilating cervices, and/or postpartum vulval suturing inserts.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-27064 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Exhibit 10.3


 




 


 


April 24, 2020


 


Mark Davis


[Address Omitted]


 


Dear Mark:


 


This letter memorializes
our recent discussions regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact on our community, our
economy, and Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


You have voluntarily
agreed, during the Specified Period (as defined below), to (i) reduce your rate of base salary by 15% from your current rate of
base salary of $182,290.00 (your “Regular Salary”) to a rate of base salary of $154,946.50 (your “Reduced
Salary”) and (ii) work from your home at the address set forth above underneath your name (your “Home Location”)
and/or your principal office location (your “Regular Location”) as contemplated by the employment agreement
between the Company and you dated September 6, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”). The “Specified Period”
shall mean the period commencing on April 16, 2020 and continuing until the Board of Directors of the Company otherwise determines.


 


For the avoidance of
doubt, for all purposes of the definitions of “Constructive Termination” and “Good Reason” set forth in
the Employment Agreement, references to your “annual base salary” shall mean your Reduced Salary and references to
your “principal office location” shall mean your Home Location and/or your Regular Location, in each case, during the
Specified Period.


 


Notwithstanding the
foregoing, for all purposes of subparagraph (A) of the “Severance” paragraph of the Employment Agreement, determinations
made by reference to your “base salary” shall be based on your Regular Salary during the Specified Period.


 


Except as modified
hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please indicate your
agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best Regards,


 


TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.


 


 


By:/s/ Nancy DiMattia           


Name: Nancy DiMattia


Title: Chief Financial Officer


 


Acknowledged and Agreed as of April
24, 2020:


 


 


 


/s/ Mark Davis                         


Mark Davis




 






    THE TILE SHOP | 14000 CARLSON PARKWAY | PLYMOUTH MN 55441 | 888-398-6595
Exhibit
4.6


Lion
Group Holding Ltd. 獅子集團控股有限公司


Company
number 359979


Warrant
Certificate




Certificate Number:


Date of Issue:


Name and Address of Warrant holder:


Subscription Price Payable on
an exercise: [Amount] per Warrant


This is to certify that the
Warrant holder named above is the registered holder of the right to subscribe in cash for [Number] of [Share Class] Shares at
the subscription price set out above subject to the Articles.


 


 


 


	 	 
	
        Name:

        Director
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 5, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

H & H TRANSFORMER, INC.,

a Colorado corporation,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE,

L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability

company doing business in Colorado,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-1524

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-00442-WYD-BNB)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. The

motion is granted. Each party shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1524 Document: 01018362653 Date Filed: 02/05/2010 Page: 1