alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILEY Y. DANIEL; LEWIS T.

BABCOCK; ZITA L WEINSHIENK;

ROBERT BLACKBURN; BOYD N.

BOLAND; RON WILEY; BLAKE R.

DAVIS; CHRISTOPHER SYNSVOLL;

DIANNA J. KRIST; WENDY HEIM;

MICHELLE BOND; RICK MARTINEZ;

TENA SUDLOW; D. FOSTER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-1552

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02840-PAB)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1552 Document: 01018426354 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Page: 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ESTATE OF PAUL S. TERRY, JR., DECEASED,

Petitioner

v.

CATHEDRAL VILLAGE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 290 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Sitemap

## February 26, 2013

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2013
- 02
- February 26, 2013

            - NASA Announces Fourth Round of CubeSat Space Mission Candidates
            - NASA’s Webb Telescope Components Meet ‘Big Red’
            - The Whirlpool Galaxy
            - SpaceX 2 Payload
            - Boeing’s Phantom Eye ISR Technology Demonstrator
            - Boeing’s Phantom Eye ISR Technology Demonstrator
            - Boeing’s Phantom Eye ISR Technology Demonstrator
            - Boeing’s Phantom Eye ISR Technology Demonstrator
            - Boeing’s Phantom Eye ISR Technology Demonstrator
            - The Whirlpool Galaxy
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD JONES.

February 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.02
 
  a)
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended April 30,
2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
 b)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By
    
    /s/ Peter L. BuzyPeter L. BuzyChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1992-B, Ltd's Balance Sheet and Statment of Operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
 </LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,222
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               91,435
<PP&E>                                         5,712,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,947,055)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,857,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,052
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,849,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,857,122
<SALES>                                        600,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,346
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,190<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            238,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   238,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation deple-
tion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest
expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RENALDO TAYLOR.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate5** 

# (!Courtof**~peaI5** 

# fortbejf 

# eberaI (!Circuit
HARRY BURNETT, Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

2012-3102 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0432110400-I-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER The Department of Justice moves without opposition for a 5-day extension oftime, until November 5, 2012, to file its brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-3102 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2012HARRY BURNETT v. DOJ The motion is granted.

s27 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-3102 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 12/03/2012
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL GIAQUINTO.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00015

- CR

JOSE CRUZ TUNAL

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 451st Judicial District Court of Kendall County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 8679

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
July 5, 2024
#### Ellis *v.*Ford, Executor.—In error.

*Saturday, May*29.

DEBT by an executor on a promise by the defendant to the testator to pay the latter a certain sum *per annum*for rent during his (the testator’s) lifetime. *Held,*that proof of the defendant’s promise, and of his payment of one year’s rent, without any evidence as to the time when the testator died, did not sustain the action.
****
Chapter 9 from *Chariots For Apollo*

Chapter 18 from *Moonport*

Annotated Bibliography About The Apollo 204 Fire

Other Apollo Missions
****
**
Updated February 1, 2003    Steve Garber, NASA History Web CuratorFor further information E-mail histinfo@hq.nasa.gov
**
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-119V

Filed: November 8, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

DANIEL BOITS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Brenton Aaron Elswick, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On January 24, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that, as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) 

vaccine on November 1, 2016, he suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1-4. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

On November 5, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “based on the record as it now 

stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” 

Id. at 5 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)). 

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen C. Raffaele, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 14, 2003              /s/ Stephen C. Raffaele
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       STEPHEN C. RAFFAELE
                                       EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
                                       AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                       STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Belden, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/ s /    John BeldenJohn Belden
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

October  31, 2004
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, INC.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT A. DELSMAN,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-16809

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01468-SBA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra Brown Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. appeals from the district

court’s order dismissing its action alleging, inter alia, defamation and trade libel. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Price v.

FILED

MAR 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16809

Stossel, 620 F.3d 992, 999 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Sedgwick’s defamation and trade libel

claims under California’s anti-SLAPP statute because defendant Delsman’s

conduct was in furtherance of his free speech rights in connection with an issue of

public interest, and Sedgwick did not meet its burden of establishing a probability

of prevailing on its claims. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16; Ruiz v. Harbor

View Cmty. Ass’n, 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133, 140-46 (Ct. App. 2005) (setting forth

§ 425.16 analysis, and concluding that defendant’s letter containing rhetorical

hyperbole was free speech in connection with an issue of public interest and that

plaintiff did not establish a probability of prevailing on his libel claim).

Sedgwick’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

 AFFIRMED.
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Division**

----

****

----

**The Apollo 13 Flight JournalDavid Woods, Johannes Kemppanen, Alexander Turhanov and Lennox J. WaughAudio preparation assisted by Jeff Sumner**

----

*Apollo 13 Flight Journal*
Apollo Flight Journal

Like its companion, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, it is intended to be a resource for all those interested in the Apollo program, whether in a passing or scholarly capacity.

This journal covers the flight of Apollo 13, eventually from launch to splashdown. As a living document, it will continue to grow and evolve. Journals for other Apollo flights are available at the AFJ Portal.

----

##### Pre-Launch Activities and Crewman Change

##### Travelling from the Earth to the Moon

- Day 1, part 1: Launch and Reaching Earth Orbit
- Day 1, part 2: Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection
- Day 1, part 3: Transposition, Docking and Extraction
- Day 1, part 4: Settling Down for the Flight
- Day 2, part 1: Midcourse Correction 2 on TV
- Day 2, part 2: Housekeeping and Updates
- Day 3, part 1: Before the Storm

##### The Rescue, Day 3

- Day 3, part 2: 'Houston, we've had a problem'
- Day 3, part 3: *Aquarius* Becomes a Lifeboat
- Day 3, part 4: Free Return
- Day 3, part 5: Minimising Power

##### The Rescue, Day 4

- Day 4, part 1: Approaching the Moon
- Day 4, part 2: Leaving the Moon
- Day 4, part 3: Heading Homeward
- Day 4, part 4: Building The CO2 Adapter
- Day 4, part 5: Checking *Odyssey*

##### The Rescue, Day 5

- Day 5, part 1: A Thump and Snowflakes in Space
- Day 5, part 2: Feeling the Cold
- Day 5, part 3: The Manual Course Correction Burn
- Day 5, part 4: Wobbles and Bursts
- Day 5, part 5: Starting the Battery Charge

##### The Rescue, Day 6

- Day 6, part 1: Packing Up
- Day 6, part 2: The Reactivation Checklist
- Day 6, part 3: Worn Out Crew
- Day 6, part 4: The Last Course Correction
- Day 6, part 5: Service Module Separation
- Day 6, part 6: *Odyssey* Resurrected
- Day 6, part 7: Farewell, *Aquarius*
- Day 6, part 8: The Blackout, Splashdown and Recovery

Postflight Activities

----

- Introduction to Journal Creation and Acknowledgements
- Apollo 13 Documents  (with thanks to Bob Andrepont & Andy Anderson)
- Service Module Damage: A Photographic Analysis  - Andy Saunders
- Photography Index
- Video Index

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### These files are copyright © 2014-2020. W. David Woods, Johannes Kemppanen, Alexander Turhanov and Lennox J. Waugh.

----
# Sitemap

## January 23, 2015

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2015
- 01
- January 23, 2015

            - Field Carrier Landing Practice at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility
            - NASA Data Peers into Greenland’s Ice Sheet
            - B-727
            - NASA Awards Power System Upgrade Contract
            - Principles of Flight Workshop Provided for Regional Teachers
            - Chandra Celebrates the International Year of Light
- Exploration Technology Directorate
- Entry Systems and Technology   - About
  - Brochure
  - Planetary Mission Entry Vehicle Quick Reference Guide
- Aerothermodynamics
- Thermophysics Facilities   - About
  - Test Schedule
  - Test Planning Information
  - Frequently Asked Questions
- More   - Thermal Protection Materials
  - Entry Systems and Vehicle...  Entry Systems & Technology Division – Staff Management    **Division Chief**  David Hash  **Assistant Division Chief**  Sharon McKee  **Staff**  Jeffrey Hill, Aerothermodynamics Branch Chief  Scott Eddlemon, Thermophysics Facilities Branch Chief  Peter Race, Thermophysics Facilities Deputy Branch Chief  Mairead Stackpoole, Thermal Protection Materials Branch Chief  Justin Haskins, Thermal Protection Materials Deputy Branch Chief  Antonella Alunni, Entry Systems & Vehicle Development Branch Chief  Ethiraj Venkatapathy, Senior Technologist for Entry Systems  Helen Hwang, Science Missions Development Manager  Jeremy Vander Kam, Project Formulation and Implementation Manager  Michael Wright, Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) Systems Deputy Capability Lead  Matthew Trudell, ATOM4 Contract Manager (Jacobs)  David Cornelius, ESTRAD Contract Manager (AMA)        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 15, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Albert Huang								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Kim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Lee
Kim


Lee Kim


Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2002
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:AJ Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFRBS 2014 C22

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-C22, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section11.12 thereof that:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer hasfulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann 

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         438,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,387,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 80,681,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,507,152
<PP&E>                                       2,150,186
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,144,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,797,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,793,338
<BONDS>                                     29,024,227
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       143,291
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,836,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,797,420
<SALES>                                     63,782,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,782,429
<CGS>                                       54,082,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,082,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,821,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             699,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,233,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                   916,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,317,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,317,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>