alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26944]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 65581]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0322; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-105]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Colebrook, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on July 19, 2010, which proposed to establish Class E airspace 
at Upper Valley Connecticut Hospital, Colebrook, NH. The NPRM is being 
withdrawn as a portion of the proposed airspace already exists. A new 
rulemaking will be forthcoming to correctly establish the new airspace.

DATES: Effective 901 UTC, October 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 19, 2010, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register to 
establish Class E airspace at Colebrook, NH to accommodate special 
standard instrument approach procedures for Upper Valley Connecticut 
Hospital (74 FR 41772) Docket No.-2010-0322. After publication, the FAA 
found that the airspace description in the proposed rule incorrectly 
included existing controlled airspace 1,200 feet above the surface. To 
avoid confusion, this proposed rule is being withdrawn and will be 
established under another rulemaking.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-105, as published in 
the Federal Register on July 19, 2010 (75 FR 41772), is hereby 
withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 15, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-26944 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of London Pacific Group Limited
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  March  31,  2003 as  filed  with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger,  as
Executive Chairman of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1)  The   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  fully   complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  May 15, 2003                              By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Lassen County Resource Advsiory will meet in Susanville, CA. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The business meeting is in preparation for the next funding cycle.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held November 10, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 12 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lassen National Forest Supervisor's Office in the Caribou Conference Room at 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Heidi Perry, Public Affairs Officer for the Lassen National Forest at 530-252-6604 or                         *hperry@fs.fed.us.*                         Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: October 15, 2010.

Jerry Bird,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-26891 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          28
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,325
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     12,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                14,451
<PP&E>                          95,662
<DEPRECIATION>                  89,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  20,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,211,006
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        93,237
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,321,704)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    20,627
<SALES>                         42,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                42,637
<CGS>                           13,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   156,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                491,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              40,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (659,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (659,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (659,916)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)







</TABLE>
H. Res. 303 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 2, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr. 

Estes of Kansas. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Estes of Kansas. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANGEL PEREZ.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form  10-Q for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005 as  filed  with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger,  as
Executive Chairman of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  November 14, 2005                         By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Exhibit 4.385

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 173482 dated April 10, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

intrazonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 

(Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 10, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 10, 2019 No. 214-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject
to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,095
<PP&E>                                          10,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,939
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,409
<SALES>                                         60,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,062
<CGS>                                           45,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,670)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.427

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 179662 dated April 22, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

communication services for the purpose of wire broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 22, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 25, 2019 No. 749-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50636

Summary Calendar

MANUEL SERJIO BANUELOS AMAYA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(EP-91-CV-262)

August 6, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel SerjioBanuelos Amaya, a Texasstate prisoner, appeals the dismissal

of his petition for habeas corpus relief from his convictions and sentence for
1Amaya v. Scott, No. EP-91-CV-262 (W.D.Tex. Aug. 11, 1995).

2Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21 (5th Cir. 1995).

2

aggravated assault. We affirm.

Amaya claims: (1) defective indictments; (2) perjury by state witnesses;

(3)ineffective assistance of counsel;(4)improper increase of sentence after his first

sentence was set aside; and (5) error in the district court’s denial of his request for

an evidentiary hearing. Our review of the briefs and record persuades us that these

claimslack merit. We therefore affirm for substantially the reasons assigned by the

district court.1

Amaya also claims on appeal relief for: (1) ineffective counsel relating to

a note the jury sent to the trial court and for failing to challenge venirepersons for

cause;(2) an unfair evidentiary hearing in state court; and (3) denial of conflict-free

trial counsel. Amaya raises these claims for the first time on appeal. We decline

to consider same because we find no plain error.2

Finally, Amaya’s motion for leave to file a supplement to his supplemental

brief is DENIED.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7213]

                    Pursuant to Section 301 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4831*et seq.*), the Secretary of State has determined that a recent attack on three Department of Defense personnel assigned to the U.S. Embassy's Office of Defense Representative Pakistan (ODRP) involved loss of life that was at or related to a U.S. mission abroad. Therefore, the Secretary has convened an Accountability Review Board to examine the facts and the circumstances of the attacks and to report to me such findings and recommendations as it deems appropriate.                

The Secretary has appointed Joseph Lake, a retired U.S. ambassador, as Chair of the Board. He will be assisted by Robert Bryson, Lewis Atherton, Barbara Martin, Wayne Rychak and by the Executive Secretary to the Board, Linda Hartley. They bring to their deliberations distinguished backgrounds in government service and/or the private sector.

The Board will submit its conclusions and recommendations to Secretary Clinton within 60 days of its first meeting, unless the Chair determines a need for additional time. Appropriate action will be taken and reports submitted to Congress on any recommendations made by the Board.

Anyone with information relevant to the Board's examination of these incidents should contact the Board promptly at (202) 647-5204 or send a fax to the Board at (202) 647-3282.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: October 8, 2010.

Patrick F. Kennedy,

Under Secretary for Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-26791 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD M. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TOTAL ACTION AGAINST

POVERTY/HEAD START, No. 98-2546

Defendant-Appellee,

and

CAROLYN D. HOPPER; CLEO C. SIMS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-96-787-R)

Submitted: March 23, 1999

Decided: April 20, 1999

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Bettina C. Altizer, Jack Vernon Altizer, ALTIZER & ALTIZER,

P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Rogers, JONATHAN ROGERS, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Edward M. Mitchell appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Total Action Against Poverty/Head Start

in Mitchell's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Mitchell argues that the district court erred in applying the "rigid"

framework of McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792

(1973), and requiring that he show he was replaced by someone not

within the protected class. Instead, to satisfy this prong of the test he

suggests that he had to establish only that he was discharged under

circumstances raising an inference of illegal discrimination. See, e.g.,

Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253

(1981). We need not resolve whether the district court applied the

wrong standard as Mitchell fails to make out a prima facie case even

under the standard he articulates. He fails to raise an inference of illegal discrimination and he also fails to show that he was performing

his duties in a satisfactory manner.

Mitchell also argues that his retaliatory discharge claim was dismissed in error. We disagree. Because Mitchell fails to show that he

was performing his duties in a satisfactory manner, he cannot show

that but for the protected conduct, he would not have been terminated.

See Dwyer v. Smith, 867 F.2d 184, 190-91 (4th Cir. 1989). Thus, the

district court did not err in dismissing the claim. Accordingly, we

affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2