alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# GEMINI-TITAN (GT)-5 – PILOT – SUITING-UP – CLOSEUP – CAPE

S65-46377 (21 Aug. 1965) --- Astronaut Charles Conrad Jr. pulls on a pair of white undergloves and has his temperature taken during suiting up operations on the morning of liftoff of Gemini-5 spaceflight from Cape Kennedy, Florida.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s65-46377/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenAugust 21, 1965ProducerJSCSize1535x1920pxPIA Numbers65-46377The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 21, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2017

No. 04-16-00828-CV

Patricia SKELTON,

Appellant

v.

Guy James GRAY,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16416A

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 8, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
        32
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 
 In
        connection with the report of Spectre Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell C. Mix, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, and I Kevin Greer, Chief Financial Officer
        of
        the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,
        that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Russell C. Mix
 
 Russell
        C. Mix
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 November
        14, 2005
 
 
 /s/
        Kevin Greer
 
 Kevin
        Greer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 November
        14, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10931

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER HORDGE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-206-5

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Hordge has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed original and supplemental briefs in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hordge has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no unfrivolous issue

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 5, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-10931 Document: 00512134786 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2013
No. 11-10931

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 11-10931 Document: 00512134786 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2013
# A CubeSat goes past the International Space Station’s solar arrays

iss059e104368 (June 17, 2019) --- A tiny satellite from Singapore, also known as a CubeSat, is ejected from the Japanese Small Satellite Orbital Deployer past the International Space Station's solar arrays. The CubeSat was among three others from Asian nations deployed earlier for technology demonstrations in Earth orbit. The orbital complex was 254 miles above the Atlantic Ocean northeast of Venezuela when an Expedition 59 crewmember took this photograph.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/a-cubesat-goes-past-the-international-space-stations-solar-arrays-48088899626-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize5568x3712pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 17, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BARON FRANKLIN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131424 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131424 COA: 269207 Saginaw CC: 03-022663-FJ DERRICK DARNELL ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1025 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 12279 and <greek-i> 12280]


Iowa Disaster Number IA-00024

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Iowa (FEMA--1930--DR), dated 08/14/
2010.
    Incident: Severe storms, flooding, and tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2010 through 08/31/2010.
    Effective Date: 10/13/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/12/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/16/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of IOWA, dated 08/14/2010 is hereby amended 
to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as 
a result of this disaster to 11/12/2010.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26781 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NANCY GARCIA.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### GREY REALTY COMPANY v. DONALD E. HOWARD.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ROSE FORTE v. VAN DORN IRON WORKS COMPANY.

December 16, 1986.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
Filed: July 15, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6470 (CA-95-397-1) James D. Haburn, Sr., Petitioner - Appellant, versus North Carolina Attorney General, et al, Respondents - Appellees.

ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed June 6, 1996, as follows:On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the district court information is corrected to read "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-397-1)" On page 2, line 7 of the opinion -- "E.D.N.C." is corrected to read "M .D.N.C." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk23 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6470 JAMES D. HABURN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; W. K. JONES, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-397-1) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Del Forge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Haburn v. North Carolina Attorney General , No. CA-95-397-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 19, 2015 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A CHILD OF INDIAN HERITAGE.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 219 *N.J.Super.*28).
#### LILLIAN HELLWIG v. J.F. RAST & COMPANY.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 215 *N.J.Super.*247)
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00422-CR

MISTI ANN HARGISS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DI STRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1330997D

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

---------- We have considered appellant’s “Mot ion To Dismiss App eal.” The motion

complies with rule 42. 2(a) of the rules of appellat e procedure. Tex. R. App. P.
42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 7, 2016
#### Hugh J. McHugh v. Elias H. Gault et al.

*Constitutional law*— Mechanic’s *lien*— Bond *for release.*

Act No. 216, Laws of 1885, amendatory of the mechanics’ lien law, as a whole, is not repugnant to the Constitution, and section three of the act, providing for the vacating of such lien upon executing the bond therein described, is valid.

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.)

Argued May 7, 1891.

Decided May 15, 1891.

Debt. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

The facts necessary to a decision of the ease are stated in the opinion.

*Oscar T. Tuthill,*for appellant.

*Hampden Kelsey,*for defendants.

Ohamplin, O. J.

The record in this ease raises only" a single question, and that is whether the circuit judge erred in rejecting the bond offered in evidence upon the ground that Act No. 216, Laws of 1885, is unconstitutional and void.

*136The court erred in so holding. We are not called upon to pass our opinion upon every section and clause of the act of 1885, but only to state that the act, as a whole, is not repugnant to the Constitution, and that the section under which the bond in this case was executed is valid.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,118
<INVENTORY>                                     40,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,606
<PP&E>                                          82,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 590,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,184
<BONDS>                                         56,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     45,657
<COMMON>                                       364,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,295)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   590,070
<SALES>                                        338,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               338,668
<CGS>                                          227,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,525)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,234)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,291)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund.

Date:March 12, 2019/s/ Matthew S. BloomMATTHEW S. BLOOMChief Executive OfficerDate:March 12, 2019/s/ Brian S. WilliamsBRIAN S. WILLIAMSChief Financial Officer
# Sitemap

## November 08, 2017

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2017
- 11
- November 08, 2017

            - NASA Sets Media Coverage of Rescheduled NOAA Weather Satellite Launch
            - JPSS-1 Now Scheduled for Nov. 14
            - Space Launch System Booster Separation Tested In Wind Tunnel
            - Rare Encircling Filament
            - Parker Solar Probe Comes to NASA Goddard for Testing
            - NASA Completes Review of First SLS, Orion Deep Space Exploration Mission
            - The Marshall Star
            - 50 years ago: The First Flight of the Saturn V
            - This Week in NASA History: Apollo 4 Launches – Nov. 9, 1967
            - NASA CubeSat to Test Miniaturized Weather Satellite Technology
585 A.2d 356

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DEREK JOHNSON.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
---

## Mike Constantine



---

Journal Contributor Mike Constantine  writes:

Mike ConstantineI am a Graphic Designer from London and contributed several Lunar Panoramas and VR's to the excellent ALSJ. I was too young to remember the Moonlandings but I first got interested in the Apollo program after finding a ghostly photograph of Neil Armstrong on the lunar surface taken by my father from the TV! Since then I have been hooked, and I was very pleased to be able to contribute something myself. I am also a (very) amature astronomer and have tried and failed at Astrophotography, so I think I'll stick to Graphic Design!

November 2001
#### IN RE MEDICAID LONG TERM CARE SERVICES BULLETIN 84-2; KING JAMES NURSING HOME OF FRANKLIN, ETC. IN RE N.J.A.C. 10:63-1.23; KING JAMES NURSING HOME OF FRANKLIN, ETC.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*48)
#### IDA BOCCELLA v. ATCO KNITTING MILLS.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
 November 13, 2007
 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. Tietz

Dennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos
Capital Corp., General Partner of the
Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.