alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          633,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    151,000
<COMMON>                                    21,966,577
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,744,749)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,275
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,090)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 48,293
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Opinion filed July 18, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-24-00037-CR

__________

MICHAEL WAYNE JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 23772-B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Michael Wayne Jackson, entered open pleas of guilty to evading 

arrest or detention with a vehicle and harassment of a public servant, third-degree 

felonies. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 22.11(b) (West 2019), 38.04(b)(2)(A) 

(West 2016). The trial court found Appellant guilty, and ordered a presentence 

investigation report (PSI) to be prepared prior to sentencing. At the sentencing 
2

hearing, the State relied solely on the PSI as punishment evidence, then Appellant 

and his sister testified. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court assessed 

Appellant’s punishment for each conviction at imprisonment for ten years in the 

Correctional Institutions Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The 

trial court further ordered the sentences to run concurrently. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 42.08(a) (West Supp. 2023).

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw in this 

court. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that there are 

no arguable issues to present on appeal. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of 

the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, an explanatory letter, a form motion for

pro se access to the appellate record, and the mailing address of this court should he 

desire to file the motion for pro se access. Counsel also advised Appellant of his

right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief, and of his right to 

file a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. As such, courtappointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Appellant has not filed pro se responses to counsel’s Anders brief. Following 

the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed 

the record, and we agree with counsel that no arguable grounds for appeal exist.1

 

1

Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68 of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure.
3

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the 

judgments of the trial court.

JOHN M. BAILEY

CHIEF JUSTICE

July 18, 2024

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
#### HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. v. BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

October 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Mario Mata, Lily Mata, and/or All 

Occupants of 2804 Hubbard Circle, Austin, 

TX 78746, Appellants

No. 06-18-00033-CV v.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as 

Trustee for SABR Trust 2004-OP1, 

Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 

2004-OP1, Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C-1-

CV-18-000434). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Stevens, participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellants pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 10, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBSCommercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C22 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information rovided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A. (as successor to NCB, FSB), as NCB Master Servicer, CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as General Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A.,as NCB Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as PrimaryServicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Primary Servicer for the Stamford Plaza Portfolio Mortgage Loan, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Stamford Plaza Portfolio MortgageLoan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Stamford PlazaPortfolio Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2019

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
`

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40359

Priscilla Villarreal,

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

The City of Laredo, Texas; Webb County, Texas; Isidro R. 

Alaniz; Marisela Jacaman; Claudio Trevino, Jr.; Juan L. 

Ruiz; Deyanria Villarreal; Enedina Martinez; Alfredo 

Guerrero; Laura Montemayor; Does 1-2,

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CV-48

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

AND PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion November 1, 2021, 5 Cir., 2021, 17 F.4th 532, withdrawn)

(Opinion August 12, 2022, 5 Cir., 2022, 44 F.4th 363)

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, 

Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, 

Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, 

Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 20-40359

Per Curiam:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for 

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judgesin regular active service 

and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en 

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify 

a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th 

Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated August 12, 2022, is

VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed 

September 9, 2022, is DENIED AS MOOT.

2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26741]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 23, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow 
Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Doug Carson & Associates, Inc., AKA Digimetrics-DCA, 
Inc., Cushing, OK; Interra Systems, Cupertino, CA; Tokyo Broadcasting 
System Television, Tokyo, Japan; and Peter Humphrey, San Francisco, CA, 
have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Tobias Soppa, 
Leipzig, Germany, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, 
Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 22, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 14, 2010 (75 FR 40851).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-26741 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CFO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Winston M. Talbert, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my
knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 6, 2008

/s/ Winston M. TalbertWinston M. Talbert Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2I, John A. Betts, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ John A. Betts     John A. Betts  Corporate Controller and Interim Principal  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eugene N. Dubay, Chief Executive Officer of the General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/ EUGENE N. DUBAYEugene N. DubayChief Executive Officer and President of the General PartnerFebruary 25, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18.U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

        In connection with the quarterly report ofNano-Proprietary, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas P, Baker, the Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

        1.     The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.     The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

 

|  

Date:  April 27, 2004 |   /s/ Douglas P.Baker               Douglas P. Baker Chief Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    L. George Klaus                         
|                       |  |     |  | L. George Klaus                                
|                       |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  

I, Michael Pietrini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                                           
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    Michael Pietrini                                                                                   
|                       |  |     |  | Michael Pietrini                                                                                          
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President Finance and Administration (Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
 August 11, 2006
    
    By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. Tietz

Dennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John Kallas

John Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.