Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 65655 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on April 2, 2010, based on a complaint 

filed by Freescale Semiconductor of 

Austin, Texas (‘‘Freescale’’). 75 FR 

16837–38. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain integrated 

circuits, chipsets, and products 

containing same including televisions, 

media players, and cameras by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,467,455; 5,715,014; and 

7,199,306 (‘‘the ‘306 patent’’). The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named numerous respondents. 

The presiding administrative law 

judge issued the subject ID on 

September 30, 2010, granting Freescale’s 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to (1) change the 

name of one respondent from 

BestBuy.com, Inc. to BestBuy.com, LLC; 

(2) correct the addresses of 

BestBuy.com, LLC and Best Buy 

Purchasing, LLC; and (3) terminate the 

investigation as to respondent Liberty 

Media Corp. No party filed a petition for 

review of the ID. The Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 21, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27044 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–698] 

In the Matter of Certain DC–DC 

Controllers and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Commission Decision 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Corrected notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 56) granting a joint motion 

to terminate the investigation as to one 

respondent and terminating the 

investigation in its entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 29, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by Richtek Technology 

Corp. (Taiwan) and Richtek USA, Inc. 

(San Jose, California) (collectively 

‘‘Richtek’’), alleging a violation of 

section 337 in the importation, sale for 

importation, and sale within the United 

States after importation of certain DC– 

DC controllers by reason of infringement 

of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,315,190; 6,414,470; and 7,132,717; 

and by reason of trade secret 

misappropriation. 75 FR 446 (Jan. 5, 

2010). The complaint, as amended, 

named eight respondents: uPI 

Semiconductor Corp. (Taiwan) (‘‘uPI’’); 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

(Sunnyvale, California) (‘‘AMD’’); 

Sapphire Technology Ltd. (Hong Kong) 

(‘‘Sapphire’’); Best Data Products d/b/a 

Diamond Multimedia (Chatsworth, 

California) (‘‘Diamond’’); Eastcom, Inc. 

d/b/a XFX Technology USA (Rowland 

Heights, California) (‘‘XFX’’); Micro-Star 

International Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) and MSI 

Computer Corp. (City of Industry, 

California) (collectively, ‘‘MSI’’); and 

VisionTek Products LLC (Inverness, 

Illinois) (‘‘VisionTek’’). See Second Am. 

Compl. ¶¶ 12–34 (May 20, 2010). 

The investigation has been terminated 

by settlement agreement or consent 

order against all parties other than 

VisionTek: On July 12, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

the ALJ’s termination of the 

investigation as against AMD, Diamond, 

and XFX. On August 13, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

the ALJ’s termination of the 

investigation against uPI and Sapphire. 

On August 20, 2010, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 

termination of the investigation against 

the MSI respondents. 

On July 27, 2010, VisionTek and 

Richek jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a consent order 

stipulation and proposed consent order. 

The ALJ denied the motion. Order No. 

51 (July 29, 2010). On August 5, 2010, 

VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to 

terminate the investigation based on a 

settlement agreement. On August 17, 

2010, the ALJ granted the motion. Order 

No. 56. Because VisionTek is the last 

respondent, termination against 

VisionTek results in termination of the 

investigation. 

No petitions for review of the ID were 

filed. The Commission has determined 

not to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.21(b) and 210.42 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR. 210.21(b), 210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 21, 2010, 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27043 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES