alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 13,937.

#### Roseboom *v.*The Jefferson School Township.

Township *Trustee.*— Authority *to Incur Debt.*— The trustee has no authority to incur a debt beyond the fund on hand, and that to be derived from the tax levy for the year, without an order from the board of commissioners.

Practice.— *Written Instrument.*— Question *on Ruling*as *to.*— Supreme *Gourt.*Where a written instrument is offered and excluded it must be brought into the record in order to present any question on the ruling excluding it.

From the Boone Circuit Court.

*P. H. Dutch,*for appellant.

*378Filed Feb. 27, 1890.

Elliott, J.

The appellant entered into a contract with Lee H. Miles, as trustee of Jefferson school township, wherein he undertook to build a school-house for the township, and for which the trustee agreed he should be paid five hundred and sixteen dollars. The appellant performed part of the work, and was prevented from prosecuting it further by George F. Young, the successor in office of Lee H. Miles. The appellee’s third paragraph of answer alleges that the contract sued on was entered into without authority, for the reason that at the time it was made there were no funds, or anticipated funds, out of which the cost of building the school-house could be paid; that the school township was then indebted above the money in the hands of the trustee, and that to be derived from the tax levy, in the sum of $706.38 ; that no order was obtained from the board of commissioners authorizing the trustee to incur a debt for the construction of the school-house. To this answer a demurrer was overruled.

The decision in the case of *Middleton*v. *Greeson,*106 Ind. 18, settles the questions arising on this answer against the appellant. The trustee had no authority to incur a debt beyond the fund on hand, and that to be derived from the tax levy for the year, without an order from the board of county commissioners.

The assessment list, which the appellants assert was offered in evidence, is not in the bill of exceptions, and consequently the record presents no question which we can consider. Where a written instrument is offered, and excluded, it must be brought into the record in order to present any question on the ruling excluding it.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                     OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, Robert W. Riland III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of DISC, Inc.



                                    By: /s/ ROBERT W. RILAND, III
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Robert W. Riland, III
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


        I, Henry Madrid, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of DISC, Inc.


                                    By: /s/ HENRY MADRID
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Henry Madrid
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer



                                       3
No. 86-1650.

#### Trans World Airlines, Inc. *v.*Independent Federation of Flight Attendants,

*ante,*p. 175. Respondent invited to file a response to the petition for rehearing within 30 days.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 24, 2011 

h0621 

Order 

 

June 24, 2011 

142300 

CATHERINE GEYER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142300 

 COA: 300472 

Genesee CC: 10-093879-CZ 

HALL CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE, INC., 

and JAMES P. HALL, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 9, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:

                    1.                     *Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P.,*                     New York, New York; to acquire voting shares of National Penn Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of National Penn Bank, both of Boyertown, Pennsylvania.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-26867 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cozumel Corporation  (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the year  ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Jehu Hand, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jehu Hand

By: Jehu Hand

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

October 14, 2008
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Larry A. Goldstone, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: May 7, 2004 By:  /s/ Larry A. Goldstone    Larry A. Goldstone    President and Chief Operating Officer(authorized officer of registrant)
EXHIBIT 10.33

PREFERRED ACCESS AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENTis made this 1st day of November, 2004, effective January 1, 2004, between MEC
HOLDINGS (CANADA) INC., an Ontario corporation ("MEC") andMAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.,an Ontario corporation ("Magna").

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THATin consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows:

1.     Grant of Preferred Access

---





all
upon the terms and conditions set out in this agreement.

2.     Memberships

2

---



3.     Term

The term of this agreement shall be deemed to have commenced on January 1, 2004 and shall terminate at 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2014.

4.     Fees and Other Charges

Magna covenants and agrees to pay to MEC the following fees and other charges at the time or times hereinafter provided:

Restaurant,
pro shop and other goods and services shall be billed monthly by MEC to Magna at MEC's regular rates, without any discount or surcharge. All amounts due from Magna to MEC
hereunder, other than the Annual Fee, shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date of any invoice delivered by MEC to Magna.

5.     Services Supplied by MEC

In connection with any corporate or charitable tournament or other event held by Magna at the Club, MEC shall furnish to Magna, without charge, the services
customarily provided by operators of comparable facilities for such events, but expressly excluding food and beverage services and pro shop purchases, which shall be billed at MEC's regular rates for
such goods and services.

3

---



6.     Representations, Warranties and Covenants

4

---





7.     Responsibility and Indemnity

8.     Rights of First Refusal

If, during the term of this agreement, MEC proposes to sell the Club as a whole, or to sell the clubhouse and/or golf course separately, to an arm's length third
party:

5

---



9.     General

IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have duly executed this agreement as of the date first written above.

| |  |     | MEC HOLDINGS (CANADA) INC.                                            
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: |                                                                       
| |  |     | Jim McAlpine
President and Chief Executive
Officer                    
| |  | By: |                                                                       
| |  |     | Blake Tohana
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer     
| |  |     | MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.                                              
| |  | By: |                                                                       
| |  |     | Vincent J. Galifi
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | By: |                                                                       
| |  |     | Michael D. Harris
Director and
Chairman, Special Committee            

6

---



QuickLinks
#### Groves and Another *v.*Stephenson.

A note beginning-tl I promise,55 &c., and signed by two persons, is joint and several, and a suit can therefore be sustained on it either against both the makers, or against one of them only, at the election of the payee.

Tuesday, *June*8.

APPEAL from the *Floyd*Circuit Court.

*R. Crawford,*for the appellants.

*J. Collins,*for the appellee.

Dewey, J.

Debt against two defendants on a joint promise. Plea, general issue. Judgment for the plaintiff below.

On the trial of the cause, the plaintiff produced a note signed by the defendants, beginning “ I promise.” The defendants objected to its admission in evidence; but the objection was overruled.

It is contended that the note should have been rejected, on the ground of a variance between the joint promise laid in the declaration, and the promise expressed in the note.

This position cannot be sustained. This Court has heretofore decided, that an instrument running “ I promise,” &c. and executed by more than one person, is joint and several. *Lambert*v. Lagow, 1 Blackf. 388, and n. 1. The promisee of a joint and several contract may elect to consider it either joint or several, and, having made his election, pursue his remedy accordingly. *Palmer*v. *Crosby,*1 Blackf. 139.—*Gibbons*v. *Surber,*4 Blackf. 155.—1 Saund. 291, n. 4. Whether he describes the contract as of the one character or the other in his declaration, when produced it will sustain the allegation. He must sue one only, or all the living obligors. If he sue one, he may declare against him without naming the others; or if he declare against all, he need not set out the several promise. 2 Chitt. Pl. 116, n. *k,*and the authorities there cited. 1 Chitt. Prec. 152, n. f. Id. 418, n. u.—*Gray et al.*v. *Palmers,*1 Esp. R. 135. Even when one of several joint contractors is declared against as having made a several promise, the joint contract cannot, under the general issue, be objected to on the ground of variance, but is good evidence for the plaintiff. 5 Co. *119.*—Wilson v. *Reddall,*Gow, *161.*—Mountstephen v. *Brooke,*1 B. & Ald. 224.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
#### Chapman *v.*The State, on the Relation of Conerley.

*Friday, May*24.

A trial of a caso of bastardy on *Sunday,*by a justice of the peace, is void.

ERROR to the *Lawrence*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

A justice of the peace, on the 27th of *January,*1838, issued a warrant against *Chapman*in a case of bastardy. On the next day, which was *Sunday,*the warrant was returned, the defendant brought before the justice, the cause tried, and the defendant adjudged to be the father of the child, &c.

*112*G. G.*Dunn, for the plaintiff.

*J. W. Payne*and *R. W. Thompson,*for the defendant.

The cause was certified to the Circuit, Court.

Upon the calling of the cause in the Circuit Court, the defendant moved to dismiss the suit, on the ground that the trial before the justice took place on a *Sunday.*The motion was overruled, the cause tried, and a verdict and judgment rendered against the defendant.

The question presented by this record is, Could the justice examine' and decide the cause on a *Sunday ?*Our answer is, that he could not. *Sunday*is *dies non juridicus;*and, by the common law, all judicial proceedings which take place on that day are void. *Swann*v. Broome, 3 Burr. *1595.*—Pearce v. Atwood, 13 Mass. *324.*—Arthur v. *Mosby,*2 Bibb, 589. Our statute has made some exceptions to this rule, but they do not apply to the case before us.

The motion made in the Circuit Court to dismiss the suit should have been sustained.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the motion to dismiss the .suit -set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
****

## Bill Wood

----

I was born in Homestead, Pennsylvania, a steel-mill town near Pittsburgh, in 1936. Spent my early years in McKeesport, Pennsylvania. In 1944 my parents family moved to Southern California to work in the war plants there. At the age of 19 I joined the USAF as guided missile technician in 1955. At the end of my four-year hitch I was working at the Edwards AFB Rocket Engine Test Laboratory as an instrumentation technician with Atlas and Thor missiles when they were test-fired there.

In 1960, after a short stint at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory as an instrumentation technician with smaller rocket engines, I decided to get into the satellite tracking business with the then-secret Corona project. I was a telemetry technician on USAF launch support ship, USNS Pvt. Joe E. Mann. We tracked most of the early "Discoverer" missions during launch phase down range off the coast of Mexico. In late 1960 I was assigned to run a new Bendix operated Corona tracking station on Tern Island, halfway between Oahu and Midway Island in the Hawaiian chain. When that station was no longer needed in 1963 I was transferred to the USNS Longview, one of two Corona Project recovery ships. 

 In September of 1966 I was transferred to the Goddard Space Flight Center, outside of Washington, D.C., to work as an Apollo Unified S-band systems advisor on the Manned Space Flight Network support team. After completing my 18 month tour of duty at GSFC I was transferred to the Goldstone MSFN station in April of 1968 and spent the following four years as a Unified S-band crew supervisor. This included all of the manned Apollo missions from Apollo 7 through Apollo 17. In 1973 I became a station crew supervisor and supported the Skylab and Apollo-Soyuz manned missions.

 In 1978, when Bendix regained the Deep Space Network contract, I was transferred to the Goldstone DSN facility where I worked as the Systems Engineer responsible for the maintenance of all technical facilities at Goldstone. In 1988 I took an early retirement from Bendix/AlliedSignal, but continued to work full time as a consultant to the Deep Space Network until 1994.

 I now live in happy retirement in Barstow, California. Most of my time is spent in sound recording restoration, digital photography and amateur radio.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65659-65660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27037]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 16, 2010, Chemic 
Laboratories, Inc., 480 Neponset Street, Building 7, Canton, 
Massachusetts 02021, made application

[[Page 65660]]

by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk 
manufacturer of Cocaine (9041), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the above 
listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers for the 
purpose of research.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substance, may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than December 27, 2010.

    Dated: October 14, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-27037 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2130

JOHN ROLANDO TIFFANY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 03-2921) Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: March 22, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Rolando Tiffany, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Janet A. Bradley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Rolando Tiffany appeals from the tax court’s orders dismissing his petition for redetermination of his liability for income taxes and additions to tax for the years 1997 to 2000, and denying his motion to vacate the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Tiffany v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , Tax Ct. No. 03-2921 (U.S.T.C. May 16, 2003 & July 16, 2003). Additionally, we deny Tiffany’s motion for a stay of proceedings and deny the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Sitemap

## December 11, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 12
- December 11, 2009

            - Connecticut Students Set for Cosmic Conversation with Space Station Commander
            - Freezing WISE’s Hydrogen
            - Atlantis Breaks Through the Clouds
            - Amendment 27: Remote Sensing Theory for Earth Science
            - STS-129 Flight Day 2
            - Titan Flyby (T-63) – Dec. 12, 2009