alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00116-CV

Norris J. DEVOLL,

Appellant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-01296

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's opposed motion for leave to file a letter to the court regarding recent case law 

is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on October 2, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict: Auditory Neuroscience.                    

*Date:*                         October 27, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         John Bishop, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5182, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408-9664,                         *bishopj@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 20, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-27040 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Spacelab

Launched on June 20, 1996, the STS-78 mission’s primary payload was the Life and Microgravity Spacelab (LMS), which was managed by the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). During the 17 day space flight, the crew conducted a diverse slate of experiments divided into a mix of life science and microgravity investigations. In a manner very similar to future International Space Station operations, LMS researchers from the United States and their European counterparts shared resources such as crew time and equipment. Five space agencies (NASA/USA, European Space Agency/Europe (ESA), French Space Agency/France, Canadian Space Agency /Canada, and Italian Space Agency/Italy) along with research scientists from 10 countries worked together on the design, development and construction of the LMS. This onboard photo represents payload commander Susan Helms and fellow astronaut in the LMS.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-9612238/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJune 21, 1996ProducerMSFCSize1920x1304pxPIA Number9612238The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 10, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### NEW JERSEY HOUSING & MORTGAGE FINANCE AGENCY v. DANIEL & FLORENCE BROOKS EATMAN.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 215 *N.J.Super.*318)
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-11-2007

In Re: Carroll

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-2404

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Carroll " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 961.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/961
1

HLD-96 (June, 2007) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 07-2404

________________

 IN RE: ALLEN WILBURN CARROLL, 

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(Related to Civ No. 06-cv-4502)

______________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 1, 2007

Before: SCIRICA, CHIEF JUDGE, WEIS and GARTH, CIRCUIT JUDGES

 (Filed : June 11, 2007) 

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Allen Wilburn Carroll seeks a writ of mandamus to compel

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule upon the

Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The District Court entered an order granting Defendant’s

motion to dismiss on May 8, 2007. Therefore, we will deny the petition for writ of

mandamus as moot.
#### Stout and Others *v.*Hicks.

*Monday, November*26.

In a suit by the plaintiff as assignee of a firm on a promissory note against the maker, the declaration need not state the names of the persons composing the firm.

ERROR to the *Fountain*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

This was an action of debt. The declaration states that *Hicks*made his promissory note to certain persons using the name, style, and firm of *Stout, Ingoldsby, Co.,*whereby he promised to pay them, &c., and that afterwards *Stout, Ingoldsby, Co.*by indorsement on said note under their hands, assigned the same to the plaintiffs.

The defendant demurred to the declaration, and the Court sustained the demurrer.

In support of the judgment of the Circuit Court, it is contended that the note set forth in the declaration, was not *50assigned as is required by the act of assembly, which provides that notes for the payment of money, &c. may be assigned by indorsement thereon under the hand or hands of the persons to whom they were made payable, so as to vest the property thereof in the assignee, &c.; that the indorsement should have been under the hands of the *persons composing the firm of*Stout, *Ingoldsby, Sf Co.;*and because the note was not so assigned, the plaintiffs could not maintain the suit in their names.

*A.*Ingram, *C.*Fletcher, *and 0.*Butler, for the plaintiffs.

*T. A. Howard., W. P.*Bryant, *and W. J.*Brown, for the defendant.

This position is not tenable. A transfer by one partner hi the name of the firm is considered as being made by all the persons entitled to make it. Each partner, by entering into the co-partnership, becomes the general agent of his co-partners in all its concerns ; and therefore it is that one member of a co-partnership may draw, indorse, or accept bills of exchange or promissory notes in the partnership name, which will be binding on the members of the company. The assignment of the note in the present case was an act in which the partner who made it acted for himself individually, and as the authorised agent of the other members of the company, and is virtually an assignment under their hands. It is not necessary that the express consent, much less the signatures of all the partners, should be obtained, if the transfer be without fraud. Gow on Part. 52.— Chitty on Bills, 40 *et seep*(1).

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, with leave to the defendant to plead to the declaration.

(1)

 “ The plaintiff declared as the indorsee of a promissory note, payable to *Lawrence Power and company,*alleging an indorsement by *Lawrence Power and company,*without setting forth the names of the persons composing *the firm.*Special demurrer. *Per Cur.*It was not necessary to set forth the names of the persons composing the firm of *Lawrence Power and company*— they being neither plaintiffs nor defendants in the suit. If the plaintiff derive his title to a note through a firm, he is not required to state in his declaration the names of the persons composing it. 8 Wheat. 642.—3 Chitt. Pl. *35.”*—Cochran v. *Scott,*3 Wend. 229.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Federal Advisory Committee Act; Standards Board Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463), the purpose of this notice is to announce that the Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) has renewed the charter for the Standards 
Board for a two-year period through October 18, 2012. The Standards 
Board is a federal advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

DATES: Renewed through October 18, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Election Assistance Commission, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 
Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gineen M. Bresso, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (202) 566-3100. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bccfc8ddd2d8ddced8cfded3ddced8fcd9dddf92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c7f786d62686d7e687f6e636d7e684c696d6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Standards Board is a Federal advisory 
committee created by statute whose mission is to advise the EAC through 
review of the voluntary voting systems guidelines; through review of 
voluntary guidance; and review of best practices recommendations. In 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 
as amended, this notice advises interested persons of the renewal of 
the Standards Board charter.

Gineen M. Bresso,
Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-27091 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# The STS-41D crew

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Members of the STS-41D flight crew are, from left to right, Michael L. Coats, Charles D. Walker, Steven A. Hawley, Judith A. Resnik, Richard M. Mullane, and Henry Hartsfield. Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-84pc-0560/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenFebruary 23, 1984ProducerKSCSize1920x1536pxPIA NumberKSC-84PC-0560The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 28, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, October 27, 2010; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: October 19, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-26913 Filed 10-20-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCEO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                               |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 6, 2004. |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES C. FLORESJames C. Flores Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HUMPHREY COHEN.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 211 *N.J.Super.*544)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a

Bernard Madoff, a/k/a Bernie Madoff,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NAJIBULLAH ZAZI, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-1535

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-02409-ZLW)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. 

R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1535 Document: 01018341508 Date Filed: 01/04/2010 Page: 1
# Earth Observations taken by the STS-114 crew

S114-E-5343 (27 July 2005) --- The Caspian Sea is featured in this image photographed by a Space Shuttle Discovery crewmember during the STS-114 mission.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s114e5343/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 27, 2005ProducerJSCSize1920x1271pxPIA Numbers114e5343The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 12, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JONATHAN ARCE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-2223

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 21, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County,

Kenneth T. Lester, Jr., Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Copeland v. State, 240 So. 3d 58, 59-60 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018); 

Beckman v. State, 230 So. 3d 77, 95-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

ORFINGER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Leonard P. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer of Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) doeshereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

(a)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 28, 2007 of the Company to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

(b)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2007
|            | /s/ LEONARD P.  SHAYKIN                                                |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **Leonard P. Shaykin**                                                 |
| ** ** | ***Chairman of the Board of  Directors and  Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TapestryPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff uponrequest. This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which itrelates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
Exhibit
















Exhibit 10.15


Mitcham Industries, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
(As of July 31, 2019)




Retainer/Fees 


Each non-employee director is entitled to receive the following compensation: 


		
	•
	an annual cash retainer fee of $32,000 per year, plus an additional $50,000 for the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; 


		
	•
	an additional cash retainer of $7,500 per year for each member of the Audit Committee, plus an additional $8,500 per year for the chairperson of the Audit Committee;  


		
	•
	an additional cash retainer of $5,000 per year for each member of the Compensation Committee, plus an additional $6,000 per year for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee; 


		
	•
	an additional cash retainer of $30,000 per year for the chairperson of the Strategic Planning Committee;


		
	•
	an additional fee of $3,500 for each Board of Directors meeting attended, including telephonic meetings.




Equity-Based Compensation 


In addition to cash compensation, non-employee directors are eligible, at the discretion of the full Board of Directors, to receive discretionary grants of stock options or restricted stock or any combination thereof under Mitcham Industries, Inc.’s equity compensation plans.