Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65515 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26895 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,347] 

NRC Corporation, USPS Help Desk of 

Customer Care Center, Including OnSite Leased Workers of Volt 

Consulting, West Columbia, SC; Notice 

of Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

By application dated September 16, 

2010, a worker requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on 

August 16, 2010 and the Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on September 3, 2010 

(75 FR 54187). The workers supply 

information technology support services 

and are not separately identifiable by 

service supplied. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that the worker 

separations, or threat of separation, were 

not related to a shift in information 

technology support service abroad or 

increased imports of like or directly 

competitive services. The investigation 

also revealed that subject firm did not 

supply a service to a firm that employed 

a worker group eligible to apply for 

TAA and that directly used the services 

in the production of an article or supply 

of service that was basis for the TAA 

certification. 

The worker, in the request for 

reconsideration, disputes the 

Department’s findings that the subject 

firm did not shift to India the supply of 

like or directly competitive services, 

and provides employment listings for 

various information technology support 

service positions at the subject firm’s 

India facility as support documentation. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26906 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,290] 

Supermedia LLC, Formerally Known as 

IDEARC Media LLC, Supermedia 

Information Services LLC, Client Care 

Group and Publishing Operations 

Group, Including On-Site Leased 

Workers of Advavtage (TAC), 

RESPRCCONN, TATACONSSV, MODIS, 

AMDOCS, and Database, Middleton, 

MA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated September 23, 

2010, the petitioner requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

negative determination regarding 

workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of the subject firm. The 

determination was issued on September 

3, 2010 and the Notice of Determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517). 

The workers supply customer service in 

support of the subject firm’s customers 

and internal publishing support 

services. Workers are separately 

identifiable by service supplied. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings there were no imports of 

either customer service or publishing 

support services by the subject firm. The 

investigation also revealed that the 

subject firm did not produce an article 

or supply a service that was used by a 

firm with TAA-certified workers in the 

production of an article or supply 

service that was basis for TAACertification. 

The request for reconsideration was 

filed on behalf of a specific worker 

group—workers of the Ad ProductionGraphics Division of SuperMedia, 

Middleton, Massachusetts. 

The request for reconsideration 

alleges that because the workers of the 

Ad Production-Graphics Division are 

separately identifiable from workers in 

other units of the subject firm, 

information related to the Customer 

Care Department and other units are not 

relevant and should not be the basis for 

denying the Ad Production-Graphics 

Division workers’ eligibility to apply for 

TAA. The request asserts that the 

supply of services provided by the Ad 

Production-Graphics Division shifted to 

India. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26905 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,301] 

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, 

A Subsidiary of AMG, Newfield, NJ; 

Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated August 29, 2010, 

a worker requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65516 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

The determination was issued on July 

30, 2010, and the Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on August 13, 2010 (75 

FR 49532). The workers provide storage 

services. 

The negative determination was based 

on the finding that a shift of production 

to Canada in 2006 did not contribute 

importantly to separations at the subject 

firm because, during the period of the 

investigation, the subject firm did not 

produce an article; rather, the subject 

firm provided storage services for other 

subsidiaries of AMG, the parent 

company, and those storage services 

were shifted to an affiliate domestic 

facility. In addition, the subject firm did 

not supply services to a firm that 

employed a worker group that is 

currently eligible to apply for TAA. 

The request for reconsideration 

alleges that the workers did not supply 

the services identified in the 

determination. The worker also states 

that the subject firm is in the process of 

permanently decommissioning and 

shifted operations to various facilities 

throughout the United States as well as 

Canada, Brazil, England, and Mexico. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26904 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,156] 

American Spring Wire Corporation, 

Kankakee, IL; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 24, 2010, 

workers requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on July 

30, 2010 and the Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on August 13, 2010 (75 

FR 49532). The workers produce metal 

stampings. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that there was no 

increase in imports of metal stampings 

(or like or directly competitive articles) 

by the subject firm or its customers, and 

no shift to/acquisition from a foreign 

country by the workers’ firm of article 

like or directly competitive with the 

metal stampings produced by the 

subject workers. The investigation also 

revealed that the workers did not 

produce a component part that was used 

by a firm that employed workers eligible 

to apply for TAA and used the 

component parts in the production of 

the article that was the basis for the 

certification. 

The request for reconsideration 

alleges that the subject firm supplied 

component parts to firms in the 

automotive industry and asserts that 

increased imports of finished articles 

that contain foreign-made component 

parts like or directly competitive with 

the metal stampings produced by the 

subject firm contributed importantly to 

separations at the Kankakee, Illinois 

facility. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26903 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,971] 

ASC Machine Tools, Inc., Spokane 

Valley, WA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated September 21, 

2010, a representative of the 

International Association of Machinists 

and Aerospace Workers (IAM&AW), 

District Lodge 751, requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

negative determination regarding 

workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of ASC Machine Tools, Inc., 

Spokane Valley, Washington (the 

subject firm). The Notice of negative 

determination was issued on August 11, 

2010 and published in the Federal 

Register on August 30, 2010 (75 FR 

52986). The workers produce customorder metal cutting machinery used to 

form and cut metal, including 

assembled equipment, component parts 

of equipment, and spare parts. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that the subject firm 

sales decline was due to loss of export 

sales of foreign customers’ bids to 

competitors outside the United States. 

The initial investigation also revealed 

decreased aggregate imports of metal 

cutting equipment during the relevant 

period and that the subject firm is not 

a supplier or downstream producer for 

any firm that employed a worker group 

eligible to apply for TAA. 

The union official, in the request for 

reconsideration, alleges increased 

imports from Sen Fung Rollform 

Machinery Corporation in Taiwan and 

Metform International in Canada. The 

union official also articulates the 

concern that ‘‘the affected workers are 

being penalized due to the inconsistent 

customer base of the company’’ and 

requests that aggregate import data 

during 2007 and 2008 be considered. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES