alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C22

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
a2022stipfinal






2022 Short Term Incentive Program (STIP) Plan Provision Terms of the Plan Program Participation  Section 16b Officers  All salaried and hourly-paid employees eligible for variable compensation Financial Objectives  Corporate – Adjusted EBITDA, Levered Free Cash Flow  Chemicals (Combined CAPV and Epoxy) – Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Cash Flow  Winchester – Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Cash Flow Non-Financial Objectives  Key strategic objectives including Safety, Environmental, Sustainability, People and Valuation objectives Weighting  Corporate – Adjusted EBITDA (50%); Levered Free Cash Flow (30%); Non-Financial (20%)  Divisions –Adjusted EBITDA (60%); Cash Flow (20%); Non-Financial (20%) Target Setting  Targets established by Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Leverage  Threshold Value Established by Compensation Committee  Maximum Value Established by Compensation Committee  Maximum payout of financial targets = 225%   Maximum payout of non-financial targets = 100%  Maximum total payout of financial and non-financial targets = 200%  No individual award may exceed 200% of target Financial Objectives Payouts  Payout at Target – 100%   Payout at Threshold – 50%   Payout Below Threshold – Zero    Payouts scale down approximately 1.8% for every 1% below target; Scale up approximately 6.25% for every  1% above target   Payout at Maximum for financial objectives is 180%, based on weighting.  If Adjusted EBITDA threshold not met, all financial payouts are discretionary. Non-Financial Objectives  Payouts  Payout on achievement of Non-Financial Objectives is independent of performance on Financial Objectives  and determined by Compensation Committee.     Payout at Maximum for non-financial objectives is 20%, based on weighting.  Exhibit 10.1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-42]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date: October 29, 2010.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: October 21, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-27072 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q OF
MUZAK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000891983
<NAME> MUZAK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                       785
<INVENTORY>                                      3,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,019
<PP&E>                                          83,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,508
<BONDS>                                        102,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,387
<SALES>                                         11,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,358
<CGS>                                            4,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall
not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 15, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LINDA HENNING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ALLEN COOPER, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 09-2224

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00328-RB-LFG)

ORDER

On December 4, 2009, the court issued an order directing the appellant to

show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of

prosecution. Appellant has not responded to the show cause order. (She has,

however, filed a new appeal which has been docketed with this court as 09-2303.) 

Due to appellant’s failure to respond to the December 4, 2009 show cause

order, this appeal (09-2224) is dismissed for lack of prosecution. See 10th Cir. R.

42.1. This order pertains to 09-2224 only. Appellant’s other appeal (09-2303)

remains pending with this court. 

Appellate Case: 09-2224 Document: 01018349469 Date Filed: 01/15/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court as to

09-2224 only. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-2224 Document: 01018349469 Date Filed: 01/15/2010 Page: 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41508

Summary Calendar

 

ALFREDO ANTONIO IRUEGAS-MACIEL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JONATHON DOBRE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-226

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfredo Antonio Iruegas-Maciel (Iruegas), federal inmate

# 37644-079, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iruegas’ claim that he was denied

due process in connection with his disciplinary hearing is

without merit since the disciplinary proceedings complied with

the requirements set forth in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539,

556-57 (1974). Additionally, Iruegas’ claim that prison

officials failed to follow their own policies, without more, does
No. 02-41508

-2-

not constitute a violation of due process. Myers v. Klevenhagen,

97 F.3d 91, 94 (5th Cir. 1996).

The district court’s decision is therefore AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Alan Gaines, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Dune
Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 2, 2007

                                               /s/ Alan Gaines
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alan Gaines
                                               Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# NASA Captures Supersonic Shock Interaction

One of the greatest challenges of the fourth phase of Air-to-Air Background Oriented Schlieren flights, or AirBOS flight series was timing. In order to acquire this image, originally monochromatic and shown here as a colorized composite image, NASA flew a B-200, outfitted with an updated imaging system, at around 30,000 feet while the pair of T-38s were required to not only remain in formation, but to fly at supersonic speeds at the precise moment they were directly beneath the B-200. The images were captured as a result of all three aircraft being in the exact right place at the exact right time designated by NASA’s operations team.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/nasa-captures-supersonic-shock-interaction-9-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Aeronautics
- Quesst
Image CreditNASASize1041x651pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Sep 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Lillian Gipson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
2 min read

# Robust Planning for Dynamic Tensegrity Structures

### Loura Hall

Oct 26, 2015

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Kostas Bekris**Rutgers University Overview

The project will research and develop high-performance motion planners for dynamic tensegrity structures, which can be used as robotic mobility and manipulation platforms for space exploration purposes. Tensegrity is an exciting principle for developing impact tolerant and lightweight planetary rovers, which can achieve arbitrary forms and locomotion gaits. They can effectively adapt to highly unstructured environments, such as the uneven terrains of planetary bodies, and result in more affordable missions due to the reduced payload. Despite their benefits, controlling tensegrity robots with traditional control methods is challenging due to high-dimensionality, dependence on non-linear dynamics and significant uncertainty. As a result, most existing solutions limit the reasoning of the underlying dynamics and provide only quasi-static paths. This project aims to provide new algorithmic, mathematical and software tools that overcome this challenge and provide dynamically feasible trajectories for purposeful long-term navigation of tensegrity robots in uneven terrain. The focus is on advancing the state-of-the-art when planning in belief space for high-dimensional robots with significant dynamics, especially when these dynamics arise from the presence of soft contacts between a tensegrity structure and a highly unstructured, uneven terrain. The objective is for computational efficiency as well as a way to formally argue about the robustness of the computed trajectories. The solutions will be evaluted first in physics-based simulation and then on real tensegrity platforms that are of interest to NASA.

**Back to ECF15**

## Discover More Topics From STRG

Space Technology Mission Directorate

STMD Solicitations and Opportunities

Space Technology Research Grants

About STRG
#### Moberly *v.*Davar.—On appeal.

*Wednesday, November 25.*

THE transcript of a justice’s judgment in this case, as shown on appeal to the Circuit Court, commenced as follows: “ *Jesse Davar,*assignee of *Thomas Grimes, v. William Moberly.*Debt on note for 24 dollars; interest 5 dollars and *55*cents.” *Held,*that the transcript showed, with sufficient certainty, what was the cause of action.

When a new trial is granted on the payment 'of costs, the right to the new trial is forfeited if the costs be not paid.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12355 and #12356]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance only for the State of New York (FEMA-1943-DR), dated 10/14/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms, tornadoes, and straight-line winds. *Incident Period:*
                         09/16/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         10/14/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/13/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/14/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/14/2010, private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kings, Queens, Richmond. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12355B and for economic injury is 12356B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-26784 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
10.2


 


Amendment
No. 1


to


Separation
Agreement


 


March
6, 2020


 


Reference
is hereby made to that certain Separation Agreement between Abeona Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Steven
Rouhandeh (the “Executive”), dated January 2, 2020 (the “Separation Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Separation Agreement,


 


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Section 2(b)(ii) is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


(ii)
The Company shall, at its expense, continue your current level of health coverage under the Company’s health plan for the
twenty-four (24) month period following the Separation Date (“Medical Benefit Payment”).


 


2.
A new Section 2(c) is hereby added to the Separation Agreement:


 


(c)
The parties hereby agree that the Company shall provide to the Executive the exclusive use of his current office at 1330 Avenue
of the Americas, New York, NY (or, if the Company relocates its executive offices, a reasonably similar office) and continued
use of his Company computer and email address, company phone, filing space and office services at the same level as currently
in place until the later of (i) two years from the date that the Executive is no longer a Director of the Company and (ii) April
1, 2022.


 


ACCEPTED
AND AGREED:


 


	 	 Abeona Therapeutics, Inc.
	 		
	 		/s/
    Mark J. Alvino
	 	By:	Mark
    J. Alvino
	 	Title:	Chair
    Comp. Comm
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    Steven H. Rouhandeh
	 	 	Steven
    H. Rouhandeh
#### Booe *v.*Davis and Another.

*Saturday, May*25.

The Court has no authority to nonsuit a plaintiff against his consent.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

Trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close. Pleas, not guilty and *liberum tenementum.*The issues were submitted to a jury for trial. After the plaintiff had closed his testimony, the defendants moved the Court to nonsuit the plaintiff. The plaintiff objected, but the Court directed the nonsuit to be entered. The bill of exceptions states, “that the defendants having introduced no testimony, moved the Court to nonsuit the plaintiff, to which the plaintiff objected, but the Court overruled his objection and nonsuited' him; to which opinion, &c. the .plaintiff excepts.”

The only point for the consideration of the Court is, whether the Circuit Court had the jfower ■ to nonsuit the plaintiff, on the trial, against his consent.

In *England,*the law is well settled, that no person is compellable to be nonsuited. 2d Tidd’s Pr. *789.*—Watkins v. *Towers et al.*2 T. R. *275*.—Dewer v. *Purday,*4 Nev. & Mann. 633. *Chitty*in his Gen. Practice, 3d vol. 910, says, “ a nonsuit must always be *voluntary,*that is, by the plaintiff’s counsel submitting to the same or not appearing, and in no case can it be adverse or without implied consent.” Consent is implied if the plaintiff withdraws himself, or, *071 being called,*-fails to answer. 3 Bl. Comm. 376. In the *United States*the practice is not uniform. In some of the States, countenance is given to the practice of nonsuiting the plaintiff against his consent. In others, the *English*practice has been adopted and invariably pursued. In the Supreme Court of the *United States,*it has been so repeat*116edly decided that the Circuit Courts have no authority to order a peremptory nonsuit, against the will of the plaintiff, that the point, in that Court, is said to be no longer open for controversy. *Doe d. Elmore*v. Grymes, 1 Pet. 469.—*D'Wolf*v. *Rabaud et al.*Ib. *497.*—Crane v. *Lessee of*Morris, &c. 6 Pet. 609.

*C. H.*Test, for the plaintiff.

*C. B. Smith*and *S. W.*Parker, for the defendants.

*We*see no sufficient reason for departing from the ancient practice. The plaintiff has a right to have every question of fact in his case tried by a jury; and to nonsuit him on the trial, against his consent, would be an infringement of that right.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded,