alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. (“OCTuS”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, George Ecker, Chief Financial Officer of OCTuS, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS.
 
 This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to OCTuS and will be retained by OCTuS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Date:  November 10, 2011
 
 /s/ GEORGE ECKER
 George Ecker
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
June 30, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ERIC L. BAUMGART, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00308-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Peti t i on for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

Ju ly 8 , 2021.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00314

- CV

IN RE R. WAYNE JOHNSON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Co unty C our t at Law No

. 2 & Probate C ourt

Br azoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 162563



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 8, 2021 , relator R. Wayne Johnson filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. R elator has been declar ed a vexatious litigant and is therefore subject to the pre

- filing order under section 11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and
Reme dies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 11.101, 11.103.2

Under section 11.103(a), the clerk of this court may not f il e an original

procee ding presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a pre

- fil ing order under section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing, or the petition for a writ of mandamus is from a p re

filing order entered under section 11.101 designating a person a vexatious l itigant. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) & (d). This is not a petition for a writ of mandamus from a pre

- filing order entered under section 11.101.

Relator has n ot responded to our June 9, 2021
, letter and has not shown that he has obtained an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing of this original proceeding.

We ORDER the petition for writ of mandamus DISMISSED

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Bourliot, Poissant, and Wilson.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES STECZ.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY LOYLE.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31


                                                  CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jehu Hand, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cozumel Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 1, 2004

/s/ Jehu Hand
Learned Jeremiah Hand
CEO and Chief Financial Officer
President
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHARLENE ROSA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2004

[September 25, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-10827CF10A.

Charlene Rosa, Ocala, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.

CERTIFICATIONS
Rule 13a-14

I, John Kallas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global
Income Fund XIV, L.P. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC), the
General Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

5.     CCCs other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ JOHN KALLAS
John Kallas
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of CCC

19
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
G. Holman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ DANIEL G. HOLMAN Daniel G. Holman
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Dated: November 17, 2004 Page 21




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arie
J. Koole, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ ARIE J. KOOLE Arie J. Koole
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) Dated: November 17, 2004 Page 22
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 26 6

. KELVI N AKW ANZ A SPOONER v

. W ELLS F ARGO BANK N. A.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a d is p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag is t rat e co urt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad vers e ru l in g, d efen d an t s Kel v i n an d M el i ss a Sp o o n er ap p eal ed t o t h e s u p eri o r

co u rt

. T h e s u p eri o r co u rt en t ered a fi n al j u d gm en t an d wri t o f po s s es s i o n i n fav o r o f

W el l s Farg o Ban k, N.A. o n J u n e 3

, 2 0 1 5

. 1 O n J u ne 8

, 2 0 1 5

, Kel v in Sp o o ner fi l ed a

“ M ot i o n t o Di s m i s s [t h e] Co ns en t Fi n al J u d g m en t an d W ri t o f Po ss es s i o n an d

Defen d an t (s ) / A p p e ll an t (s ) Mo t i o n fo r Su m m ary Ju d gm en t ” an d an “ Affi d av i t o f

Ap p earan ce an d Ap p el l an t ’ s Bri ef.” Th e tri al co urt d en i ed Sp o o n er’ s Ju n e 8 m o t i o n

o n Ju n e 2 2

, 2 0 1 5

. Sp o o n er fi l ed a n ot i ce o f ap p eal an d an ap p l i cat i o n f o r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal fro m t h at o rd er. W e d i sm i s s ed Sp o o n er’ s ap p l i cat i on on J u l y 2 4,

2 0 1 5

. See Cas e N o

. A1 5 D0 4 8 7

. W e l ack ju ri s d ict i o n o v er Sp o o n er’ s d irect ap p eal

.

“ [A] p p eal s fro m d eci s io ns o f t h e s up eri o r co urt s rev iewi n g d eci s i o n s o f l o wer

co u rt s b y cert i orari o r de no v o p ro ceed i n g s sh al l b e by ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal .” (Pu n ct uat i o n o m i t t ed .) Bu l l o ck v. S a n d

, 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p

. 8 74

, 8 7 5 (5 8 1 SE2 d

3 3 3) (2 0 0 3 ); s ee al s o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ). As referen ced ab o v e, w e d i s m i s s ed

Sp o o n e r ’s a p p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i on ary rev i ew o f t h e o rd er at i s s ue, an d h e i s n ot

en t i t l ed t o a d i rect ap p eal o f t h e s am e o rd er. Acco rd i n g l y , h is a p p e a l i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

1 Sp o o n er fi l ed a d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, wh i ch we d i s m i s s ed

fo r fai l u re t o fo l l ow d i s cret i on ary ap p e a l p r o c e d u res

. See Cas e No

. A1 5 A2 1 1 4,
d i s m i s s ed o n Au g u s t 3 , 2 01 5

. September 16, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/16/2015
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1040 

Recognizing August 7, National Night Out, the national coming together 

of Americans all over the Nation to unite and promote public safety. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2018 

Mrs. TORRES (for herself and Mr. RUTHERFORD) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing August 7, National Night Out, the national coming together of Americans all over the Nation to unite 

and promote public safety. 

Whereas on the first Tuesday of August, our Nation will observe National Night Out, a day to cultivate a better relationship between residents of a community and their 

local law enforcement, and to promote public safety; 

Whereas the participation in National Night Out by over 

38,000,000 neighbors in over 16,000 communities across 

the United States for over 35 years is unparalleled; 

Whereas the relationship between local law enforcement and 

the residents which they are sworn to protect and serve 

has improved immensely; 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1040 IH 

Whereas general awareness of public safety has improved, because of the continued efforts of communities to meet 

their law enforcement officers and participate in National 

Night Out activities; 

Whereas prominent figures, such as former Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson and former Vice President Joe Biden, 

have recognized the impact that National Night Out has 

made across the Nation, bringing all Americans closer together to achieve a common goal of community cohesiveness and public safety; and 

Whereas National Night Out not only includes Americans on 

the mainland, but includes those in United States territories and military bases to ensure all are included in the 

effort of community building and public safety awareness: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) encourages law enforcement departments to 

3 use National Night Out to improve relationships 

4 with the communities they serve; 

5 (2) encourages public safety departments to in6 form communities— 

7 (A) how to most effectively contact their 

8 911 responders and emergency service pro9 viders; and 

10 (B) how they carry out their duties; and 

11 (3) recognizes the impact that has been made 

12 for the past 35 years in communities all over the 

13 United States of America by National Night Out in 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1040 IH 

1 creating a more united country by fostering relation2 ships between residents, neighbors, and local law en3 forcement, and promoting public safety awareness. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Mario Mata, Lily Mata, and/or All Occupants of 2804 Hubbard Circle, Austin, TX 78746, Appellant s

No. 06

- 18

- 00033

- CV v.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee for SABR Trust 200 4

- OP1, Mortgage Pass

- Through Certificates, Series 2004

- OP1, Appellee s Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C

- 1

- CV

- 18

- 000434 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens

, participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. We further order that the appellant s pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 10, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT SCHMIDT.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 213 *N.J.Super.*576)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128586 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, RONALD WARD, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128586 

 COA: 250174 

Jackson CC: 03-001492-NH 

DR. SHARON ROONEY-GANDY, 

D.O., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REINSTATE the order of the Jackson Circuit Court dismissing plaintiff's complaint with 

prejudice for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent. 

KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

l1102 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 9, 2005 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-11-003]


ECOP Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 13, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 8, 2010, ECOP Gas Company, LLC (ECOP) 
filed its Refund Report pursuant to its July 30, 2010, Settlement 
Agreement approved by an August 12, 2010, Letter Order.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#773132253438191b1e191224020707180503371112051459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84c2c1d6c7cbeae8edeae1d7f1f4f4ebf6f0c4e2e1f6e7aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time Friday, October 22, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26481 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Community Partners – NASA

Official National Aeronautics and Space Administration Website

- Students Present GLOBE Research at INFINITY Science Center with NASA ASTRO CAMP Community Partners Team Nineteen 5th-12th-grade student scientists gathered on 5 and 6 April, 2024 at the INFINITY Science Center in Pearlington, Mississippi for the U.S. GLOBE Southeast Student Research Symposium. The students traveled to the symposium with educators and chaperones from Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi to celebrate environmental research conducted using Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the [...]
- NASA Research Gathers Key Radar Data for Autonomous Air Cargo Delivery When autonomous air taxis and cargo delivery vehicles fly above neighborhoods, safe operations will depend on their ability to detect and avoid other aircraft and obstacles. As part of the agency’s broad portfolio of work on&#160;Advanced Air Mobility, NASA researchers visited the Mountain View, California headquarters of industry partner Reliable Robotics in late February to [&#8230;]