65656 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–705] 

In the Matter of: Certain Notebook 

Computer Products and Components 

Thereof; Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Terminating the 

Investigation Based on a Settlement 

Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 28) granting a joint 

motion filed by the complainant and the 

respondents to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–1999. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on February 24, 2010, based on a 

complaint filed by Toshiba Corporation 

of Japan (‘‘Toshiba’’). 75 FR 8400. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1337) in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain notebook 

computer products and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

Toshiba’s patents. The complaint named 

Wistron Corporation of Taiwan, Wistron 

InfoComm (Texas) Corporation of 

Grapevine, Texas, and Wistron 

InfoComm Technology (America) 

Corporation of Flower Mound, Texas 

(collectively, ‘‘Wistron’’) as respondents. 

On October 4, 2010, Toshiba and 

Wistron jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement, pursuant to Commission rule 

210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The 

Commission investigative attorney 

supported the joint motion. 

On October 5, 2010, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 28) granting 

the joint motion to terminate the 

investigation. No petitions for review of 

the ID were filed. The Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 20, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26978 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Advanced Media 

Workflow Association, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 23, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Advanced Media Workflow Association, 

Inc. has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Doug Carson & Associates, 

Inc., AKA Digimetrics-DCA, Inc., 

Cushing, OK; Interra Systems, 

Cupertino, CA; Tokyo Broadcasting 

System Television, Tokyo, Japan; and 

Peter Humphrey, San Francisco, CA, 

have been added as parties to this 

venture. Also, Tobias Soppa, Leipzig, 

Germany, has withdrawn as a party to 

this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and Advanced 

Media Workflow Association, Inc. 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media 

Workflow Association, Inc. filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 22, 2010. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 14, 2010 (75 FR 40851). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26741 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Pistoia Alliance, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 27, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Pistoia 

Alliance, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Eagle Genomics Ltd., 

Babraham Research Campus, 

Cambridge, United Kingdom; Blue 

Reference, Inc., Bend, OR; and 

Biowisdom Ltd., Harston, Cambridge, 

United Kingdom, have been added as 

parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and Pistoia 

Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional 

written notifications disclosing all 

changes in membership. 

On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, 

Inc. filed its original notification 

pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 

Department of Justice published a notice 

in the Federal Register pursuant to 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 65657 

Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 

(74 FR 34364). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on July 13, 2010. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 18, 2010 (75 FR 51114). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26740 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—International SAE 

Consortium Ltd. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 21, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

International SAE Consortium Ltd. 

(‘‘ISAEC’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Amgen, Inc., Thousand 

Oaks, CA; AstraZeneca UK Ltd., 

London, United Kingdom; Cerner 

Corporation, Kansas City, MO; Clinical 

Data, Inc., Newton, MA; and Merck 

Sharp & Dohme Corp., Rahway, NJ, has 

been added as parties to this venture. 

Also, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, INC., 

Basel, Switzerland; Johnson & Johnson 

Pharmaceutical Research & 

Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ; and 

Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and ISAEC 

intends to file additional written 

notification disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On September 27, 2007, ISAEC filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 

(72 FR 62867). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department of Justice on May 21, 

2008. A notice was published in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on June 27, 2008 (73 FR 

36571). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26737 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—ASTM International 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 23, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ASTM 

International (‘‘ASTM’’) has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing additions or 

changes to its standards development 

activities. The notifications were filed 

for the purpose of extending the Act’s 

provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, ASTM has provided an 

updated list of current, ongoing ASTM 

standards activities originating between 

May 2010 and September 2010 

designated as work items. A complete 

listing of ASTM work items, along with 

a brief description of each, is available 

at http://www.astm.org. 

On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 

(69 FR 65226). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on May 6, 2010. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 1, 2010 (75 FR 30440). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26736 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Alliance for Water 

Stewardship 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 10, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Alliance for Water Stewardship (‘‘AWS’’) 

has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the name and 

principal place of business of the 

standards development organization 

and (2) the nature and scope of its 

standards development activities. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting 

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 

actual damages under specified 

circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the name and principal place of 

business of the standards development 

organization is: Alliance for Water 

Stewardship, Arlington, VA. The nature 

and scope of AWS’s standards 

development activities are: (1) To 

establish equitable, voluntary, 

transparent, science-based standards for 

socially beneficial and environmentally 

sustainable use and management of 

fresh water at the watershed level; (2) to 

promote use and management of fresh 

water which will maintain or improve 

biodiversity and ecological processes 

and secure longterm benefits for local 

peoples and society at large; and (3) to 

encourage effective governance for 

water use and management through 

voluntary certification of businesses and 

water service providers. The AWS is 

responsible for coordinating and 

overseeing the process of developing 

water use and management target 

standards and indicators, such as 

catchment flow volume, user 

abstraction, nutrients in effluents, 

sediments in effluents, temperature of 

effluents, water pricing, and other 

aspects of a voluntary water 

stewardship standard system. As part of 

its standards development activities, the 

AWS organizes a Global Water 

Roundtable and continent-level 

Regional Initiatives, through which it 

invites stakeholder organizations to 

participate in the standards 

development process. The AWS will 

hold the intellectual property resulting 

from its standards development 

activities until such a time when it may 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES