alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE VICTOR QUIROA-ARIAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10059

D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00435-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

 G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Victor Quiroa-Arias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-

month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

APR 15 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10059

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Quiroa-Arias’

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Quiroa-Arias the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Elizabeth A. Merritt v. Henry E. Stebbins.

*Evidence*— Conversations.

In a suit involving the ownership of a colt, the mother of which the plaintiff testifies to having purchased, and to being the sole owner of the same, evidence of conversations between the vendor and third parties, not in plaintiff’s presence, tending to show that the sale was not made to the plaintiff, is inadmissible.

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.)

Argued May 15, 1891.

Decided June 5, 1891.

Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*E. J. March*and *W. G. GhadwicJc,*for appellant.

*G. A. Shepard, A. St. John,*and *S. F. Dwight,*for defendant.

McGrath, J.

Plaintiff, the wife of John W. Merritt, brings replevin against defendant, for the recovery of the possession of a sucking colt, taken by defendant as constable upon an execution against George *W.*Merritt.1

Defendant testified that he took the colt upon an execution from plaintiff's possession, and plaintiff testified that she owned the mother of this colt, and bought her from Thomas 0. Eilson in 1885; that she had been the sole owner from that time down to the time of the trial; that the mother of the colt was served at her expense and by her direction; and that the colt was her property.

Counsel for defendant then called a witness, who was *343permitted to testify, under objection, to a conversation between George W. Merritt and Mr. Filson with reference to the purchase of the mother of the colt, and to a conversation between George W. Merritt and the witness in which said George W. Merritt told witness that, if he got the mare, he would let witness use her on the road selling pumps. Defendant also called William H. Filson, a son of Thomas Filson, who was allowed to testify, under- objection, to a conversation between George W. Merritt and said Thomas Filson, with reference to the purchase of the mare in question. It appeared that this witness was not present at the time the mare was actually purchased, and the witness stated that he did not know to his own knowledge who purchased the mare. Plaintiff’s counsel moved to strike out the testimony, but the court refused. It was not claimed that plaintiff was present at any of these conversations. The record abounds with testimony of this character, which was. clearly inadmissible.

The plaintiff, after the defendant had rested, undertook to show by Thomas Filson himself that he sold the-mare to plaintiff, and took back from her a chattel mortgage to secure the purchase price; but the court, refused to admit it, on the ground that it was not proper-rebutting testimony.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered',, with costs of this Court to plaintiff.

The other Justices concurred.

1

George W. Merritt was a brother of plaintiff’s husband.
Exhibit 10.5(b)

Exhibit A

APL  Spectrum Acquisition

Acquisition Look Back Example For Employment Agreement



|                                                                                     |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ----------- | -
|Most recent quarterly distribution                                                   |  |   | 0.63        |  
|Multiplied by four                                                                   |  |   | 4           |  
|                                                                                     |  |   |             |  
|Annualized distribution                                                              |  | $ | 2.52        |  
|                                                                                     | 
|Closing price of APL common unit on 12/31/2008                                       |  | $ | 38.00       |  
|                                                                                     | 
|Yield (distribution/Closing price)                                                   |  |   | 7.20        | %
|                                                                                     | 
|Distributed Cash Flow generated by acquisition during the 12 months ended 12/31/2008 |  | $ | 10,000,000  |  
|                                                                                     | 
|Imputed Value (Dist Cash Flow / Yield)                                               |  | $ | 138,888,889 |  
|                                                                                     | 
|Incentive %                                                                          |  |   | 1.50        | %
|                                                                                     | 
|Incentive amount (Imputed value * Incentive %)                                       |  | $ | 2,083,333   |  
|                                                                                     | 
|# of units issued (Incentive amount / unit price)                                    |  |   | 59,524      |
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc. 

600 Washington Boulevard

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C23

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

March 3, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |
|------------------------|--|
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL EDWARD SHOOK, Jr.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

LIONEL C. APKER, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-15735

D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00264-FRZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Paul Edward Shook, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

APR 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15735

Shook contends the district court erred by treating his claims of inadequate

medical care as arising under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403

U.S. 388 (1971), rather than section 2241. We disagree. Despite the relief he

seeks, Shook’s claims concern the conditions of his confinement and are properly

brought under Bivens.

The district court acted within its discretion when it dismissed Shook’s

petition without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order to file an

amended complaint. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir.

1992).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.7




   Schedule to Stock Option Agreement under the Company's Stock Incentive Plan


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Option Holder                  Number of Shares          Exercise Price             Date of Grant
-------------                  ----------------          --------------             -------------
<S>                            <C>                       <C>                                <C> <C>
David Dean                     6,000                     $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
George M. Dickens, Jr.         34,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
R. S. Evans                    100,000                   $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Daniel J. Geller               20,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Clifford T. Gordon             15,500                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Barry J. Kulpa                 326,000                   $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Gregory D. Lambert             65,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Carl A. Liliequist             39,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Paul W. Lyle                   34,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000
Stokes Ritchie                 21,000                    $4.29 per share            January 24, 2000

George M. Dickens, Jr.         29,400                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
Daniel J. Geller               27,000                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
Barry J. Kulpa                 140,000                   $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
Carl A. Liliequist             29,400                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
Thomas S. McHugh               13,500                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
John Olson                     28,000                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001
Kenneth E. Thompson            20,000                    $5.00 per share            January 22, 2001

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DBV Technologies S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre-Henri Benhamou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                                                      
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2015     
|                         
|/s/ Pierre-Henri Benhamou
|Name:                     |  | Pierre-Henri Benhamou                                
|                          | 
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# STS-102 crewmember activity in the ISS

STS102-319-001 (8-21 March 2001)--- Astronaut James S. Voss, Expedition Two flight engineer, is photographed in the U.S.-built Unity node on the International Space Station (ISS) during the STS-102 mission.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts102-319-001/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 4, 2001ProducerJSCSize1920x1267pxPIA NumberSTS102-319-001The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 06, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27252]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0048]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit 
Insurance Policy.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit Insurance 
Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of the applicant and 
the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance under its insurance 
program. Export-Import Bank customers will be able to submit this form 
on paper or electronically.
    The Export-Import Bank has made changes to incorporate new 
information in the Certification and Notice sections of this form to 
clarify and expand to encompass broader anti-corruption certifications. 
In the Certification and Notice sections we rewrote some of the 
language for clarification, we corrected references to the debarment 
list, and we added references to the OFAC and the EPLS system. In 
addition, we clarified two questions about the amount of U.S. 
employment to be supported by this transaction and added a question to 
implement greater flexibility in our U.S. content requirements.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 29, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 3048-
0023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-50 Application for Short-Term Multi-
Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-0023.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export 
Credit Insurance Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of 
the applicant and the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance 
under its insurance program.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27252 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Leonard P. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



Date:
November 4, 2004

| |  | /s/LEONARD P. SHAYKINLeonard P. Shaykin
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV,
L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, certify,
based on my knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Registrant.

November 14, 2002

| |  |    |  |                                                                                                                 
| |  | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                                                                                             
| |  |    |  |                                                                                                                 
| |  |    |  | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE GORDON.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6868]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 24 and 25 at 
the U.S. Department of State and the Boeing Company, Arlington, 
Virginia. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed 
to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate 
security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion 
of trade secrets and proprietary commercial information that is 
privileged and confidential, and will discuss law enforcement 
investigative techniques and procedures. The agenda will include 
updated committee reports, a global threat overview, and other matters 
relating to private sector security policies and protective programs 
and the protection of U.S. business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
Jeffrey W. Culver,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-2684 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P