65450 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

1See Magnesium Metal from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2008– 

2009 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order, 75 FR 20817 (April 21, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2See Preliminary Results. 

Dated: October 18, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26929 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 25, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi 

Blum, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0197. 

Background 

On March 2, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated a 

new shipper review under the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India for the period July 

1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty and Countervailing 

Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 10758 

(March 9, 2010). This new shipper 

review covers one producer and 

exporter of the subject merchandise to 

the United States: SRF Limited. On 

August 27, 2010, the Department 

published a notice of extension for this 

new shipper review. See Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

from India: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review, 75 FR 52717 

(August 27, 2010). The preliminary 

results of this review are currently due 

no later than October 22, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

section 351.214(i)(1) of the Department’s 

regulations require the Department to 

issue the preliminary results of review 

within 180 days after the date on which 

the new shipper review was initiated, 

and final results of the review within 90 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results were issued. 

However, if the Department concludes 

that a new shipper review is 

extraordinarily complicated, section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and section 

351.214(i)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations allow the Department to 

extend the 180-day period to 300 days, 

and to extend the 90-day period to 150 

days. The Department determines that 

this new shipper review involves 

extraordinarily complicated issues 

pertaining to the bona fides of the new 

shipper, including the examination of 

importer and customer information. The 

Department also must address certain 

complicated methodological issues 

pertaining to SRF Limited’s reported 

sales data. Because of these issues, the 

Department must issue another 

supplemental questionnaire to SRF 

Limited, provide SRF Limited with time 

to respond, and analyze SRF Limited’s 

response. 

Therefore, the Department is 

extending the deadline for completion 

of the preliminary results of this new 

shipper review by an additional total of 

55 days, in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2). Accordingly, the deadline 

for the completion of the preliminary 

results is now no later than December 

16, 2010. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 18, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26924 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–896] 

Magnesium Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

2008–2009 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

preliminary results in the 2008–2009 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of magnesium metal from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) is April 1, 2008, 

through March 31, 2009. We have 

determined that Tianjin Magnesium 

International Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’), the only 

respondent in this review, made sales in 

the United States at prices below normal 

value (‘‘NV’’). There are no other 

respondents covered by this review. We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

our Preliminary Results. Based on our 

analysis of the comments received, we 

made changes to our margin 

calculations for TMI. The final dumping 

margin for this review is listed in the 

‘‘Final Results Margins’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 25, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel LaCivita, Sergio Balbontin, Eve 

Wang, or Eugene Degnan, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4243, (202) 482– 

6478, (202) 482–6231 and (202) 482– 

0414, respectively. 

Background 

On April 21, 2010, the Department 

published its Preliminary Results in the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of magnesium metal from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).2 On April 

30, 2010, US Magnesium LLC 

(‘‘Petitioner’’) requested a hearing for 

issues raised in the case and rebuttal 

briefs. 

On May 14, 2010, all parties 

(Petitioner and TMI) submitted publicly 

available surrogate value data to value 

TMI’s factors of production. On May 24, 

parties submitted rebuttal comments 

addressing the May 14, 2010 

submissions. On July 14, 2010, the 

Department re-opened the record to 

place additional wage rate information 

on the record for consideration in the 

final results, and requested parties to 

provide comments on that data in their 

case and rebuttal briefs. 

We received the case briefs from 

Petitioner and TMI on July 22, 2010, 

and rebuttal briefs on July 27, 2010. In 

addition, on August 26, 2010, TMI 

provided comments on the 

Department’s July 14, 2010, wage rate 

information. On August 30, 2010, 

Petitioner provided rebuttal comments 

to TMI’s wage rate comment. 

On August 18, 2010, the Department 

extended the deadline for the final 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES