65612 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 

Item 

Estimated 

time for 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated 

annual 

responses 

Estimated 

annual 

burden 

hours 

Request to Record an Official Insignia of a Federally-Recognized Tribe ..................................................... 30 5 3 

Request to Record an Official Insignia of a State-Recognized Tribe ........................................................... 30 3 2 

Totals ...................................................................................................................................................... .................. 8 5 

Estimated Total Annual Non-hour 

Respondent Cost Burden: $8. There are 

no capital start-up, maintenance, or 

recordkeeping costs associated with this 

information collection. There are also 

no filing fees for submitting a tribal 

insignia for recording. However, this 

collection does have annual (non-hour) 

costs in the form of postage costs. 

Customers may incur postage costs 

when submitting the information in this 

collection to the USPTO by mail. The 

USPTO estimates that the average firstclass postage cost for a submission 

mailed through the U.S. Postal Service 

will be $1.05 and that up to 8 

submissions will be mailed to the 

USPTO per year. Therefore, the total 

non-hour respondent cost burden for 

this collection in the form of postage 

costs is approximately $8 per year. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, e.g., the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: October 20, 2010. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26975 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 61–2010] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 102—St. Louis, 

MO; Application for Reorganization 

Under Alternative Site Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 

(the Board) by the St. Louis County Port 

Authority, grantee of FTZ 102, 

requesting authority to reorganize the 

zone under the alternative site 

framework (ASF) adopted by the Board 

(74 FR 1170, 1/12/09; correction 74 FR 

3987, 1/22/09). The ASF is an option for 

grantees for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones 

and can permit significantly greater 

flexibility in the designation of new 

‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/ 

users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service 

area’’ in the context of the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

a general-purpose zone project. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the 

regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 

400). It was formally filed on October 

19, 2010. 

FTZ 102 was approved by the Board 

on April 27, 1984 (Board Order 251, 49 

FR 19540, 5/8/84), and expanded on 

March 3, 1987 (Board Order 344, 52 FR 

7915, 3/13/87) and on January 30, 2009 

(Board Order 1604, 74 FR 6364, 2/9/09). 

The current zone project includes the 

following sites: Site 1 (11.13 acres)— 

Metro International Trade Services, 

LLC, warehouse, 3901 Union Boulevard, 

St. Louis; Site 2 (492.086 acres)— 

NorthPark industrial park located at the 

northeast corner of Interstates 70 and 

170 in the municipalities of Berkeley, 

Ferguson and Kinloch; and, Site 3— 

consisting of three parcels located at 

and adjacent to the Lambert-St. Louis 

International Airport: Hazelwood 

Commerce Center (Site 3A—169.76 

acres) located on Commerce Center 

Drive in Hazelwood; Lindbergh 

Distribution Center (Site 3B—25.848 

acres) located at 5801 N. Lindbergh 

Boulevard in Hazelwood; and, Airport 

Property No. 1 (Site 3C—75.99 acres) 

located at 5620 Banshee Road in St. 

Louis. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be the City of St. 

Louis and St. Louis County, Missouri. If 

approved, the grantee would be able to 

serve sites throughout the service area 

based on companies’ needs for FTZ 

designation. The proposed service area 

is within and adjacent to the St. Louis 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its existing zone project 

under the ASF as follows: renumber the 

parcels of Site 3 (Site 3A would become 

Site 3; Site 3B would become Site 4; 

and, Site 3C would become Site 5); Sites 

2, 3, 4 and 5 would become ‘‘magnet’’ 

sites; and, Site 1 would become a 

‘‘usage-driven’’ site. The ASF allows for 

the possible exemption of one magnet 

site from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits that 

generally apply to sites under the ASF, 

and the applicant proposes that Site 2 

be so exempted. Because the ASF only 

pertains to establishing or reorganizing 

a general-purpose zone, the application 

would have no impact on FTZ 102’s 

authorized subzones. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ 

Staff is designated examiner to evaluate 

and analyze the facts and information 

presented in the application and case 

record and to report findings and 

recommendations to the Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions (original 

and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address below. The closing period for 

their receipt is December 27, 2010. 

Rebuttal comments in response to 

material submitted during the foregoing 

period may be submitted during the 

subsequent 15-day period to January 10, 

2011. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading 

Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, 

which is accessible via http:// 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 65613 

information, contact Camille Evans at 

Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482– 

2350. 

Dated: October 19, 2010. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27079 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

National Estuarine Research Reserve 

System 

AGENCY: Estuarine Reserves Division, 

Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource 

Management, National Ocean Service, 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Comment Period for 

Revised Management Plans for the 

following National Estuarine Research 

Reserves: North Inlet-Winyah Bay, SC 

and San Francisco Bay, CA. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office 

of Ocean and Coastal Resource 

Management, National Ocean Service, 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), U.S. 

Department of Commerce is announcing 

a thirty day comment period for the 

revised management plans of the North 

Inlet-Winyah Bay, SC National 

Estuarine Research Reserve and the San 

Francisco Bay, CA National Estuarine 

Research Reserve. 

The revised management plan for the 

North Inlet-Winyah Bay, SC National 

Estuarine Research Reserve outlines the 

administrative structure; the education, 

training, stewardship, and research 

programs of the reserve; and the plans 

for future land acquisition and facility 

development to support reserve 

operations. The goals described in this 

plan are designed to provide a 

framework that supports program 

integration based on priority issues 

defined by the reserve. The objectives 

described in this plan are designed to 

address the most critical coastal issues 

in North Inlet-Winyah Bay such as 

impacts from coastal and watershed 

development, climate events on coastal 

ecosystems and human communities, 

and invasive species impacts on habitat 

loss and biodiversity. Since the last 

approved management plan in 1992, the 

reserve has become fully staffed; added 

a Coastal Training Program that delivers 

science-based information to key 

decision makers; and added significant 

monitoring of emergent marsh 

vegetation, invasive species, water 

quality, and bird populations. In 

addition to programmatic and staffing 

advances, the reserve upgraded its 

headquarters building with a 4500 

square foot structure to support 

research, stewardship, and the coastal 

training programs that includes six 

offices, a monitoring lab, and library. In 

cooperation with the Belle W. Baruch 

Foundation, a 12,500 square foot 

education facility was developed to 

support reserve educational programs 

and includes interpretive exhibits, 

aquaria, classrooms, and education staff 

offices, as well as an outdoor classroom. 

This plan can be accessed for review at 

http://www.northinlet.sc.edu. 

The revised management plan for the 

San Francisco Bay National Estuarine 

Research Reserve outlines a framework 

of overarching goals and program 

specific objectives that will guide the 

education, training, research, and 

developing stewardship programs of the 

reserve; describes land acquisition and 

boundary expansion; as well as outlines 

plans for facility use and development 

to support reserve operations. The goals 

and objectives put forth in this plan 

focus programmatic efforts on four 

critical issues that affect the reserve’s 

ability to conserve ecological 

communities in support of the Bay’s 

growing population: climate change, 

species interactions, water quality, and 

habitat restoration. Broadly, the goals 

for each of these issues include 

increasing knowledge, understanding 

effects, and improving the ability of 

partners and stakeholders to respond to 

these issues. The goals described in this 

plan are designed to provide a 

framework that supports program 

integration for collaborative 

management of the San Francisco Bay 

Reserve. 

Since the last approved management 

plan in 2003, the reserve has a full 

complement of core staff; established a 

research lab, fully operational Systemwide Monitoring Program, and Graduate 

Research Fellowship Program; added a 

Coastal Training Program that delivers 

science-based information to key 

decision makers; developed education 

programs focused on sharing estuarine 

research with non-academic audiences; 

and constructed facilities to support 

essential functions of the reserve at its 

headquarters on the Romberg Tiburon 

Center campus of San Francisco State 

University. These facilities include 

office space for staff, classroom space, 

laboratory, and meeting facilities. The 

reserve has also constructed facilities 

and interpretive exhibits at its 

components sites, China Camp State 

Park and Rush Ranch Open Space 

Preserve, that support on-site research 

and educational programs. This plan 

can be accessed for review at http:// 

www.sfbaynerr.org. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alison Krepp at (301) 563–7105 or 

Laurie McGilvray at (301) 563–1158 of 

NOAA’s National Ocean Service, 

Estuarine Reserves Division, 1305 EastWest Highway, N/ORM5, 10th floor, 

Silver Spring, MD 20910. 

Dated: October 8, 2010. 

Donna Wieting, 

Acting Director, Office of Ocean and Coastal 

Resource Management, National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27068 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Withdrawal of Notice for Preparation of 

an Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Pine Mountain Dam & Lake Project, 

AR 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Little Rock District of the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is 

withdrawing its intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

for the Pine Mountain Dam & Lake 

Project, AR. The original Notice of 

Intent (NOI) was published in the 

Federal Register on September 25, 2009 

(74 FR 48934). The River Valley 

Regional Water District, sponsor of the 

study, has recently requested the study 

be suspended until a later date (to be 

determined). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Dana Coburn, Chief, Environmental 

Branch, Planning and Environmental 

Division, P.O. Box 867, Little Rock, 

Arkansas 72203–0867, Telephone 501– 

324–5601, e-mail: 

Dana.O.Coburn@usace.army.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pine 

Mountain Dam project was authorized 

for construction by Congress in 1965. 

Additional studies and a preliminary 

draft EIS were prepared in the 1970s. In 

1980, prior to public review of the EIS, 

the local sponsor decided not to 

continue sponsoring the project. In 

2000, the River Valley Regional Water 

District identified themselves as a 

willing sponsor and requested that the 

Corps of Engineers reevaluate the 

project. The proposed Pine Mountain 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES