alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.: Exhibit 10.22 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    PROMISSORY NOTE

    BORROWER: GreenPower Motor Company Inc., of Suite 240 - 209 Carrall Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 2J2

     (the "Borrower")

    LENDER: FWP Acquisition Corp. of                                                                                   


     (the "Lender")

    AMOUNT: $2,035,000.00                                           

    DATE: December 30, 2019                                 

    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, on the Payment Date (as hereinafter defined) the Borrower promises to pay to the Lender, at                                                                     or at such other address as the Lender may direct the Borrower in writing, the principal sum of TWO MILLION AND THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND Dollars ($2,035,000.00) in lawful money of Canada (hereinafter the "Principal Sum"), together with interest on the unpaid balance of the principal sum at the Interest Rate (as hereinafter defined).

    For the purpose hereof, "Payment Date" means the earlier of (i) the date that the Borrower completes an equity financing of more than Five Million US Dollars (US$5,000,000) (ii) from receipt of proceeds on the sale of buses in excess of Ten Million US Dollars (US$10,000,000) or (iii) April 15th, 2021.

    For the purpose hereof, the "Interest Rate" means Twelve per cent (12%) per annum.  Interest at the Interest Rate will be calculated and paid on the last day of each month and after each of maturity, default and judgment.  If the Borrower fails to make any payment of interest when due, the Borrower will pay compound interest thereon computed on the last banking day of each month until such interest is paid.

    The Borrower shall have the right, without the consent of the Lender, to prepay in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, all or any of the amounts due hereunder without bonus or penalty.

    The Borrower agrees to grant the Lender a general security assignment on the assets of the Borrower, which will be subordinated to the BMO Bank of Montreal.

    The Borrower hereby waives demand, notice of dishonor and presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest of this promissory note.

    SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED as of December 30th, 2019.

    GreenPower Motor Company Inc.

    By: /s/ Michael Sieffert                                      

    Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 10.7


 


同意函


Letter of Consent


 


本人,施海银(身份证号码:
533525198702010682),为 华路纲(身份证号码:
32040219721123081X)之合法配偶。本人在此无条件并不可撤销地同意___华路纲于2019年7月17日签署下列文件(下称“交易文件”),并同意按照以下文件的约定处置华路纲持有、并登记在其名下的无锡王道科技有限公司(“公司”)的股权:


I, Shi Haiyin
(ID Number: 533525198702010682), is the lawful spouse of Hua Lugang (ID Number: 32040219721123081X).
I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree that Hua Lugang signed the following documents (hereinafter referred to
as “Transaction Documents”) on July 17, 2019 and consent to dispose of the shares of Wuxi Kingway Technology
Limited (“Domestic Enterprise”) held by Hua Lugang and registered under his name in accordance with
the provisions of following documents:


 


		(1)	与能工网络科技(无锡)有限公司(下称“独资公司”)、公司及公司其他股东签署的《股权质押合同》;



The Equity Pledge Agreement signed
by Skillful Craftsman Internet Technology (Wuxi) Limited (hereinafter referred to as “WFOE”), Company
and other shareholders of Company;


 


		(2)	与独资公司、公司及公司其他股东签署的《独家购买权合同》;及



The Exclusive Purchasing Right
Agreement signed by WFOE, Company and other shareholders of Company;


 


		(3)	与独资公司及公司其他股东签署的《授权委托协议》。



The Authorization Agreement signed
by WFOE and other shareholders of Company.


 


本人确认本人对公司的股权不享有任何权益,且承诺不就公司的股权提出任何主张。本人进一步确认,高晓履行交易文件以及进一步修改或终止交易文件或签署其他文件代替交易文件,并不需要本人另行授权或同意。


I confirm that I do not have any interests
in the equity of Company and promise not to make any claim on the equity of the Company. I further confirm that the performance
of the Transaction Documents and further modification or termination of the Transaction Documents or the signature of other documents
to replace the Transaction Documents by Hua Lugang does not require my authorization or consent.


 






     


     


    

  


本人承诺将签署一切必要的文件,并采取一切必要的行动,以确保(经不时修订的)交易文件得到适当履行。


I promise I will sign all necessary documents
and take all necessary actions to ensure that the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) are properly performed.


 


本人同意并承诺,如本人由于任何原因获得公司的任何股权,则本人应受(经不时修订的)交易文件的约束,并遵守作为公司的股东在(经不时修订的)交易文件下的义务,且为此目的,一旦独资公司提出要求,本人应签署格式和内容基本与(经不时修订的)的交易文件相同的一系列书面文件。


I agree and promise that if I acquire any
equity interests in the Company for any reason, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and
abide by the obligations of the shareholders of the Company under the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time). For
this purpose, once upon the requests of the WFOE, I shall sign a series of written documents with the same format and contents
as the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).


 





	 	/s/
                                         Shi Haiyin
	 	(Signature)
	 	 
	 	姓名:施海银
	 	Name: Shi Haiyin
	 	 
	 	日期: 2019年7月17日
	 	Date:July 17, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1999
 <CASH>                        2,257
 <SECURITIES>                    200
 <RECEIVABLES>                 1,487
 <ALLOWANCES>                  0
 <INVENTORY>                       2,598
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>               7,249
 <PP&E>                        16,561
 <DEPRECIATION>                5,849
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                19,963
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         2,130
 <BONDS>                        2,712
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
 <PREFERRED>                   0
 <COMMON>                      179
 <OTHER-SE>                    14,320
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  19,963
 <SALES>                       2,181
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,181
 <CGS>                         0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>              5,453
 <LOSS-PROVISION>              0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>            216
 <INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,052)
 <INCOME-TAX>                  0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,052)
 <DISCONTINUED>                0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>               0
 <CHANGES>                     0
 <NET-INCOME>                  (2,052)
 <EPS-BASIC>                   (.14)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                 (.14)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Matthews, No. 6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1 (W.D. 

Va. May 1, 2008; Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000891284
<NAME> MNB BANCSHARES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,250,079
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,600,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 25,371,412
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,359,039
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,388,000
<LOANS>                                     65,137,243
<ALLOWANCE>                                    869,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,864,637
<DEPOSITS>                                  88,100,400
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            981,599
<LONG-TERM>                                    309,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,391
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,276,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             103,864,637
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,398,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,412,354
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               124,278
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,935,589
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,901,372
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,045,700
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,889,889
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   45,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (21,309)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,231,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,121,943
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,121,943
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   777,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.85
<LOANS-NON>                                    130,526
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     39
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               819,660
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,795
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,239
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              869,104
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           798,683
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         65,239
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 25, 

2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00974-CV

COOPER INDUSTRIES, LLC, ET AL, Appellants 

V.

PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING CO., INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 80th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-77606 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 19, 2018. On April 9, 2019, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion 

has been on file for more than ten days and appellee has not filed a response opposing 

the motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered 

dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
# Sitemap

## December 27, 2017

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2017
- 12
- December 27, 2017

            - Kwanzaa Tholus on Ceres
            - A New Stellar X-ray “Reality” Show Debuts
            - All Aglow
**Exhibit
        32.2**
  
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Josie
        Ben
        Rubi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
        knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        OCTuS, Inc., and will be retained by OCTuS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
                      Josie Ben
                      RubiChief
                      Financial
                      OfficerAugust
                      8,
                      2007
#### ISADORE GERSHBERG, APPELLANT, v. ROSE BRAVERMAN, RESPONDENT.

Argued October 3, 1944

Decided December 28, 1944.

Before Justices Parker and Cor.iE.

For the appellant, *Allan L. Tumarhin.*

For the respondent, *Joseph N. Braff.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The suit is for a penalty of $50 per month for ten successive months, claimed because of an overcharge of rent for an apartment in violation of regulations of the O. P. A. The District Court found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff rented the apartment at $40 per month, the price limit set by the O. P. A. The letting did not include garage; facilities, but defendant had a garage in a separate building, and the parties agreed on $5 a month for use of the garage, and plaintiff paid $45 per month for ten months, and then brought the present suit for the penalty. The trial court held, in effect, that the penalty applied to overcharge for “housing accommodations” and that garage space in a separate building was no part of “housing accommodations” but a distinct matter not covered by the regulation invoked; and awarded judgment for defendant tenant. With that view we are in accord: and the judgment under review is accordingly affirmed, with costs.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11629

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00085-SPC-MRM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH SPRADLIN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 10, 2018)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Spradlin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2
#### IN THE MATTER OF MILDRED COMERFORD, AN ALLEGED MENTAL INCOMPETENT.

May 12, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

William Charles Gatewood, Jr. , Appellant

No. 06

- 22

- 00006

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 21F0801

- 005 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

W e note that the appellant, William Charles Gatewood, Jr. , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2 8 , 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: D ebra K. Autrey , Cler k
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2




Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Metrics for 2020




On December 11, 2019, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future performance-based restricted stock unit final awards for the 2020-2022 performance-period for participants, including executive officers, under the Company's shareholder-approved 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix I to the Company's Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 29, 2018).


The performance based restricted stock unit grant is a target opportunity; however, participants will have the opportunity to earn a maximum of up to 200% of the target.  The performance based restricted stock unit grant has a three-year performance period (2020-2022), after which the Compensation Committee will determine the final award based on corporate performance-to-objectives. The maximum performance level that can be achieved for any single metric for the 2020 Performance Unit grants is 200%. 100% of the final award will be based on financial metrics and can be modified by up to +/-25% based on relative Total Shareholder Return of Ford’s common stock compared to a peer group of companies over the three-year performance period.  The metrics and weightings are summarized below:






	
		
	Financial Metrics – 100%
Company Free Cash Flow
Company Adjusted EBIT Margin
External Annual ROIC
	Weighting
50%
30%
20%

	

Total Shareholder Return
	

Modifier

	Total Shareholder Return (TSR)


	+/- 25%
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 184 

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to 

transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives 

relating to communications with the government of Russia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself and Mr. TED LIEU of California) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents 

to the House of Representatives relating to communications with the government of Russia. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested, and the At2 torney General of the United States is directed, to trans3 mit, respectively (in a manner appropriate to classified in4 formation, if the President or Attorney General deter5 mines appropriate), to the House of Representatives, not 

6 later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this 

7 resolution, copies of any document, record, memo, cor8 respondence, or other communication in their possession, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 184 IH 

1 or any portion of any such communication, that refers or 

2 relates to the following: 

3 (1) Any meeting or communication that oc4 curred between Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III 

5 and any representative of the Russian government, 

6 including his meetings with the Russian Ambassador 

7 to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak, on July 18, 

8 2016, and September 8, 2016. 

9 (2) The Attorney General’s testimony before 

10 the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on January 

11 10, 2017, including but not limited to his statement 

12 that he ‘‘did not have communications with the Rus13 sians’’. 

14 (3) The Attorney General’s written response to 

15 Senator Patrick Leahy’s letter of January 17, 2017. 

16 (4) The Attorney General’s letter of March 6, 

17 2017, to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 

18 (5) The Attorney General’s preparation for con19 firmation hearings before the Senate Committee on 

20 the Judiciary, with respect to the subject of contact 

21 between President Trump’s campaign and any rep22 resentative of the Russian government. 

23 (6) The Attorney General’s recusal from any in24 vestigation related to the 2016 Presidential election, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 184 IH 

1 but not from other related matters, and the imple2 mentation of that recusal. 

3 (7) The application of part 600 of title 28, 

4 Code of Federal Regulations, to any case involving 

5 the 2016 Presidential election or any related matter. 

6 (8) Any meeting that occurred between any em7 ployee of President Trump’s campaign or transition 

8 team and any representative of the Russian govern9 ment, including any meeting that involved Donald J. 

10 Trump, Michael Flynn, Jared Kushner, Carter 

11 Page, J.D. Gordon, Richard Burt, Paul Manafort, 

12 Roger Stone, or Michael Cohen. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HENRYLK CEGIELNIK v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND VAN VALEN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES ERIC PREVOR and BARRY JAY PREVOR, individuals and as

Co-Personal Representatives of THE ESTATE OF ROSLYN DALE 

PREVOR,

Appellants,

v.

CHERYL PREVOR,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-883

[July 9, 2020]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jessica Ticktin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CP005540XXXXSB.

Peter A. Sachs, Roberto M. Vargas, and Carlee G. Rizzolo of Jones 

Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Michael S. Singer, Antonio P. Romano, and Brian M. Spiro of Comiter, 

Singer, Baseman & Braun, LLP, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Sitemap

## September 05, 2022

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2022
- 09
- September 05, 2022

            - Sols 3582-3585: Labor of Love