alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 07-1510

LYNN HOWARD, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES ARMY, c/o Secretary of the Army, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:06-cv-00783-GBL) 

Submitted: October 30, 2008 Decided: January 20, 2009 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Douglas Steinberg, Alexandria, Virginia; George R. Royer, 

Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States 

Attorney, Monika L. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Lynn Howard appeals from the district court’s order 

granting the United States Army’s motion to dismiss his Title 

VII, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) claims and dismissing 

his complaint in its entirety without leave to amend to add 

state law tort claims and claims under the Equal Pay Act. On 

appeal, Howard argues that the district court erred in part 

because it dismissed his action based on failure to file his 

Title VII and ADEA claims within the ninety-day statutory 

deadline. He also alleges that the court erred in dismissing 

his action without permitting him to amend his complaint to add 

Equal Pay Act and state law tort claims. Finding no error, we 

affirm. 

 We conduct a de novo review of the dismissal of a 

complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6). Etape v. 

Chertoff, 497 F.3d 379, 382 (4th Cir. 2007). We may affirm a 

district court’s judgment on any ground supported by the record. 

Suter v. United States, 441 F.3d 306, 310 (4th Cir. 2006). 

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, the joint 

appendix and supplemental joint appendix, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. 

See Howard v. US Army, No. 1:06-cv-00783-GBL (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 

2007). 

2 
3 

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
EX‐35.15

 
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

270 Park Avenue, 

New York, NY 10017

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Beverly Connection Companion Loan (in such capacities, "Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014  (the "reporting period"):

 

 

(a)  A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 4, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp

 

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Operating Advisor WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, and Custodian, and Trustee, relating to the series GSMS2014-GC24 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the Beverly Connection Companion Loan, a Pari passu portion of which is included in the Series JPMBB 2014-C23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
#### URSULA SOLEK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ADVOCATE.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.2I, James M. Lindstrom, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 15, 2005 /s/ James M. Lindstrom         James M. Lindstrom    Chief Financial Officer
#### MARIANNE PECULSKI v. PENN MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       Apr-01-1997                
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                   919,194
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            732,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              368,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,114,547
<PP&E>                                   299,688
<DEPRECIATION>                           134,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,362,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    473,353
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  36,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,427,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,362,994
<SALES>                                1,149,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,149,239
<CGS>                                    236,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            236,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         558,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (8,757)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          275,650
<INCOME-TAX>                              36,958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      238,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             238,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Whipple, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  February 3, 2011
By:
/s/ ANDREW WHIPPLEAndrew WhippleChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 965 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 965

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site as the ``Saint-
      Gaudens National Historical Park'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saint-Gaudens National Historical 
Park Redesignation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SAINT-GAUDENS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) In General.--The Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site shall be 
known and designated as the ``Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park''.
    (b) Amendments to Public Law 88-543.--Public Law 88-543 (78 
Stat.749) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``National Historic Site'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``National Historical Park'';
            (2) in section 2(a), by striking ``historic site'' and 
        inserting ``Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park'';
            (3) in section 3, by--
                    (A) striking ``national historical site'' and 
                inserting ``Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park''; 
                and
                    (B) striking ``part of the site'' and inserting 
                ``part of the park''; and
            (4) in section 4(b), by striking ``traditional to the 
        site'' and inserting ``traditional to the park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, document, 
record, map, or other paper of the United States to the Saint-Gaudens 
National Historic Site shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 965

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site as the ``Saint-
      Gaudens National Historical Park'', and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Deotexis Inc. financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,281
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,173
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           279
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,173
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,230
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ANTHONY CONDONE v. WILLIAM FAUVER, COMMISSIONER.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated January 12, 2010 on our review of
the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of and for the three month periods ended November 30, 2009 and 2008 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 is incorporated by
reference in the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-72756. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
|Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.    
|Houston, Texas                      
|January 12, 2010
Exhibit 31.1I, Thomas A. Daiber, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ Thomas A. Daiber         Thomas A. Daiber    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7780
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY DUANE SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (5:02-cr-00047-FPS) Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying with prejudice h is motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Scott , No. 5:02-cr-00047-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 11629 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16

- cr - 00085

- SPC

- MRM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JOSEPH SPRADLIN, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (January 10, 2018) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , NEWSOM and ANDERSO N , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Stephen J. Langs , appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 1 of 22 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (19 67). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit , counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Spradlin ’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL F. WILSON.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## May 01, 1971

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1971
- 05
- May 01, 1971

            - May 1971 – Mariner 9 Launched
# Sitemap

## October 27, 2022

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2022
- 10
- October 27, 2022

            - NASA Armstrong Completes F/A-18E Tests
            - NASA Wallops Supports Department of Defense Rocket Launches
            - The British Overseas Territory of Turks and Caicos Islands
            - Vancouver, British Columbia and Seattle, Washington
            - The Canadian Rockies in British Columbia and Alberta
            - Northern Italy’s cloud-covered Po Valley region
            - The waxing gibbous Moon above eastern Canada
            - Edwards Air Force Base in California
            - Mauna Loa, the world’s largest active volcano in Hawaii
            - The Mounts of Cantal, the remnants of Europe’s largest stratovolcano
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892038
<NAME>                        TELEPAD CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                            724,260
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,128,757
<ALLOWANCES>                       95,000
<INVENTORY>                     2,288,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,349,366
<PP&E>                            896,591
<DEPRECIATION>                   (533,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,936,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,845,332
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          120,656
<OTHER-SE>                      3,091,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,936,412
<SALES>                           457,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  673,161
<CGS>                             404,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     514,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,169,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (998,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (998,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.08)
        


</TABLE>