alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Apollo 7

S68-26668 (June 1968) --- The official emblem of Apollo 7, the first manned Apollo space mission. The crew will consist...

S64-31816 (10 Sept. 1964) --- Astronaut R. Walter Cunningham.

S64-31469 (10 Sept. 1964) --- Astronaut Donn F. Eisele.

S68-46604 (5 Aug. 1968) --- The prime crew of the first manned Apollo mission (Spacecraft 101/Saturn 205) is seen in...

This Aug. 5 1968 image was taken aboard the MV Retriever in the Gulf of Mexico, where the Apollo 7...

Pictured left to right, in the Apollo 7 Crew Portrait, are astronauts R. Walter Cunningham, Lunar Module pilot; Walter M....

S68-29781 (22 April 1968) --- Low angle view at the Kennedy Space Center's Pad 34 showing the erection of the...

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- Apollo 7 astronauts enter transfer van, which transported them to Cape Kennedy's Launch Complex 34...

S68-48788 (11 Oct. 1968) --- The Apollo 7/Saturn IB space vehicle is launched from the Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex...

S68-48787 (11 Oct. 1968) --- The Apollo 7/Saturn IB space vehicle is launched from the Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex...

Lunar module pilot Walter Cunningham writes with a space pen as he performs flight tasks on the ninth day of...

On October 22, 1968, 50 years ago, the Apollo 7 crew splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico.

On Oct. 22, 1968, the Apollo 7 crew is welcomed aboard the USS Essex, the mission's prime recovery ship. This...

Astronaut Donn F. Eisele, Apollo 7 command pilot, smiles through a heavy growth of beard as he is photographed during...
[+] ./state_v._roach.pdf
   [-] ./state_v._roach_1.pdf


   [+] ./men_of_color_helping_all_society_inc._v._city_of_buffalo.pdf
   [-] ./men_of_color_helping_all_society_inc._v._city_of_buffalo_1.pdf
   [-] ./men_of_color_helping_all_society_inc._v._city_of_buffalo_2.pdf
   [-] ./men_of_color_helping_all_society_inc._v._city_of_buffalo_3.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._cuauthemoc_sanchez-lopez.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._cuauthemoc_sanchez-lopez_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._cuauthemoc_sanchez-lopez_2.pdf


   [+] ./jeffrey_a._azis_v._united_states_internal_revenue_service.pdf
   [-] ./jeffrey_a._azis_v._united_states_internal_revenue_service_1.pdf
   [-] ./jeffrey_a._azis_v._united_states_internal_revenue_service_2.pdf
   [-] ./jeffrey_a._azis_v._united_states_internal_revenue_service_3.pdf
   [-] ./jeffrey_a._azis_v._united_states_internal_revenue_service_4.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._nancy_hurley.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._nancy_hurley_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._nancy_hurley_2.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger_2.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger_3.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger_4.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._daniel_danger_5.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._maurice_jabbar_white.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._maurice_jabbar_white_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._maurice_jabbar_white_2.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._goffer_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_3.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_5.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_7.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._deonte_sullins.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._deonte_sullins_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._deonte_sullins_2.pdf


   [+] ./loretta_runs_after_v._united_states.pdf
   [-] ./loretta_runs_after_v._united_states_1.pdf
   [-] ./loretta_runs_after_v._united_states_2.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._manuel_hrneith.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._manuel_hrneith_1.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._manuel_hrneith_2.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._manuel_hrneith_3.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._manuel_hrneith_4.pdf


   [+] ./kimelyn_a._minnifield_v._johnson__freedman_ii_llc.pdf
   [-] ./kimelyn_a._minnifield_v._johnson__freedman_ii_llc_1.pdf
   [-] ./kimelyn_a._minnifield_v._johnson__freedman_ii_llc_2.pdf
   [-] ./kimelyn_a._minnifield_v._johnson__freedman_ii_llc_3.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._goffer.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_2.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_4.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._goffer_6.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._leonel_montoya-garcia.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._leonel_montoya-garcia_1.pdf


   [+] ./rochelle_driessen_v._11th_judicial_circuit_court_in_and_for_dade_county.pdf
   [-] ./rochelle_driessen_v._11th_judicial_circuit_court_in_and_for_dade_county_1.pdf


   [+] ./united_states_v._jorge_alejandro_anaya_medina.pdf
   [-] ./united_states_v._jorge_alejandro_anaya_medina_1.pdf
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES R. TURNER, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 24 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file the 

already-prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 5 days.
#### Bolton and Another *v.*Burnett.—In error.

*Saturday, November*23.

A SEALED note, executed by *James A. Bolton*¿nd *William*Brown, was payable to *William Burnett*and *Daniel Hankins. Hankins*assigned his interest in the note to *Burnett.*Held, that the assignment was valid, and that *Burnett*might sustain a suit on the note against the makers in his own name. *Sneed*v. Mitchell, 1 Hayw. R. 289.
#### RICHARD TRINKLE, ET AL. v. INGA JOHNSON, ETC., ET AL.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## February 20, 2015

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2015
- 02
- February 20, 2015

            - Where Are They Now: Pathfinder Plus
            - B-47A
            - NASA-JAXA’s TRMM Satellite Sees Rapid intensification of Category-5 Marcia
            - Students Recognized During ‘Celebrate Literacy Week’ Event
            - Eye Ultrasound
            - Testing Sub-Scale Parachutes for NASA’s Orion Spacecraft
            - Flight Surgeon
            - NASA Snaps Picture of Eastern U.S. in a Record-Breaking “Freezer”
            - Flight Surgeons on the Job
            - Sols 905-907: Testing “Telegraph Peak”
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Andre
M. Hilliou, Chief Executive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    ANDRE M. HILLIOU
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Andre M. Hilliou Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, James Meier, Chief Financial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES MEIER
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | James Meier Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,122,112
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 47,926,002
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,180,474
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,206,000
<LOANS>                                     75,444,363
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,269,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             134,939,091
<DEPOSITS>                                 111,328,003
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,470,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,087,999
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,803,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,706
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,236,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             134,939,091
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,597,994
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              673,516
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                31,743
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,303,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,105,191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,224,832
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,078,421
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,647
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,039,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,962
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     194,460
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   194,460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    420,722
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,291,901
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   25,720
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,393
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,269,574
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           896,772
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        373,861
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (“PESI”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Dr. Louis F. Centofanti, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
May 7, 2010




/s/
      Louis F. CentofantiDr.
      Louis F. CentofantiPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,
and not for any other purpose.
#### Burrow *v.*State.

Opinion delivered November 3, 1924.

1. Seduction — indictment—felonious intent. — An indictment for seduction which charges the crime in the language of Crawford *&.*Moses’ Dig., § 2414, sufficiently charges the offense without alleging a felonious intent, since seduction was not a felony at common law, and the statute does not make a felonious intent an essential part of the crime.

2. Seduction — evidence of unchastity. — Exclusion of letters of the prosecutrix to accused, written after he had sexual intercourse with her, and tending to show that she was unchaste prior to the alleged seduction,, *held*reversible error. •

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court; *John G. Ashley,*Judge;

reversed.

*Schoonover & Jackson*and *Smith & Blackford,*for ■appellant. ■ ’ .

*J. S'. Utley,*Attorney General, and *John L. Garter,*Assistant, for appellee."

' ' Humphreys, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in the circuit' court of Randolph County for the crime of seduction, and'adjudged'to serve a term of two years'in the State Penitentiary and to pay a fine of $500 as punishment therefdr: From the judgment of conviction an appeal has been duly prosecuted to this court.

■' Appellant was indicted under § 2414"of Crawford -■& Moses’ Digest, and the indictment is substantially in "the language of the statute. ' '

One assignment of error insisted upon by appellant for a reversal- of the judgment is that the indictment . was fatally defective because it omitted to allege that the crime was committed with a felonious intent. Seduction *139was not a felony at common law, where a felonious intent was an essential' to the crime. 35 Cyc., p. 1329. T'he statute does not make a felonious intent an essential part of the crime, so the indictment sufficiently charged the ■offense without alleging a felonious intent. *State*v. *Eldridge,*12 Ark. 608; *State*v. *Seawood,*123 Ark. 565.

The next assignment of error insisted upon by' appellant for a reversal of the judgment was the refusal of the court to admit in evidence twenty-four letters written by the prosecuting witness to appellant, in the fall after he had sexual intercourse with her in the spring and .summer. These letters tended to show that she was unchaste previous to the alleged seduction, and not merely that her thoughts lasciviously inclined toward appellant, who was charged- with seducing her: ■ The letters should not therefore have been excluded, under the rule of evidence announced in the case of *Wilhite*v. *State,*84 Ark. 67. In that case the letter was properly excluded on the ground that the contents thereof indicated that the prosecuting witness was bent upón sexual intercourse with the defendant, and the court said that it did not lie in his mouth, after he had seduced, her, to show her lascivious inclination toward him.

Again, the letters were clearly admissible'as. affecting the credibility of the prosecuting witness.

There are other ■ assignments of error which it. js unnecessary to discuss, as they will not likely recur on the retrial of the case.

On account of the error indicated the judgment'.!? reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
# Sitemap

## November 03, 2006

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2006
- 11
- November 03, 2006

            - The Auroral Oval Seen from Space
            - NASA/Marshall Astronomy: BATSE Bursts Location Map
            - AXAF hrma
            - Cassini Significant Events 10/26/06 – 11/01/06
# Cosmonauts Sergei Krikalev and Yuri Gidzenko work in the Zvezda Service Module

ISS01-323-010 (8 November 2000) --- Early film documentation of the Expedition 1 crew members onboard the International Space Station (ISS) shows cosmonauts Sergei K. Krikalev (left) and Yuri P. Gidzenko at work in the Zvezda Service Module.  Krikalev, flight engineer, and Gidzenko, Soyuz commander, represent the Russian Aviation and Space Agency. This is one of the first film images released from the Expedition 1 crew.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/iss001-323-010-9474353008-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
Image CreditNASASize2048x3072pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Nov 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board

 2019 FAIR ACT INVENTORY

Sequence Total Activity First Year

Number

Agency 

Bureau Office State City Country FTEs Function Code Status On Inventory

Agency 

Suffix Reserved Reserved Reserved

1 389-02 Board DC Washington US 3 Y415 I 1999

2 389-01 Appeals Counsel DC Washington US 35 Y415 I 1999

3 389-00 General Counsel DC Washington US 14 Y415 I 1999

4 389-00 Clerk of the Board DC Washington US 15 Y415 I 1999

5 389-00 Office of Policy and Evaluation DC Washington US 13 T821 I 1999

6 389-00 Equal Employment Oppurtunity DC Washington US 1 B501 I 1999

7 389-00

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 1 C700 I 1999

8 389-00

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 6 C000 C 1999

9 389-00 Information Resources Management DC Washington US 11 W100 I 1999

10 389-00 Information Resources Management DC Washington US 6 W310 C 1999

11 389-00 Office of Regional Operations DC Washington US 4 Y415 I 1999

12 389-00 Office of Regional Operatons GA Atlanta US 17 Y415 I 1999

13 389-00 Office of Regional Operations IL Chicago US 16 Y415 I 1999

14 389-00 Office of Regional Operations TX Dallas US 13 Y415 I 1999

15 389-00 Office of Regional Operations PA Philadelphia US 13 Y415 I 1999

16 389-00 Office of Regional Operatons NY New York US 8 Y415 I 1999

17 389-00 Office of Regional Operations CA San Francisco US 16 Y415 I 1999

18 389-00 Office of Regional Operations CO Denver US 12 Y415 I 1999

19 389-00 Office of Regional Operations VA Arlington US 16 Y415 I 1999

20 389-00

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 0 C301 I 1999

21 389-01

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 1 C400 I 1999

22 389-02

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 2 C409 I 1999

23 389-03

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 2 B000 I 1999

24 389-04

Financial and Administration 

Management DC Washington US 2 A000 I 1999

Total FTE 227

Office Location Status Additional Information
* Judge, U.S. Cour t of International Trade, sitting by

designation.

** Purs uant to 5 t h Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 00-30797

___________________________
HARRY MENDOZA; ET AL, Plaintiffs, HARRY MENDOZA; NORVEL ORAZIO, Plaintiffs-Appellees.

VERSUS

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL,

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

98-CV-2868-J

___________________________________________________ January 5, 2001 Before JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI * , Judge.
PER CURIAM: ** Appellants challenge the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree at issue in this case. For the reasons stated by the district court in its order of May 31, 2000, we agree with2

the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree and
AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s motions0 to supplement the record, to strike a portion of the brief, and to strike the record are hereby DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GILBERT PETERSON.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSE FRANCISCO JIMINEZ.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 10.35

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS

CHAIRMAN OF THE
BOARD

The Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. R.S. Evans, receives a cash retainer fee of $100,000 per year effective
January 1, 2006. Mr. Evans receives no other compensation for his service on the Board and its Committees.

OTHER
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Non-employee directors, other than
Mr. Evans, receive the following compensation:

Cash Compensation



| |  | $25,000 annual Board retainer
|- |  | -----------------------------



| |  | $10,000 annual retainer for chairman of the Audit Committee
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  | $1,500 annual retainer for other Audit Committee members
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  | $3,000 annual retainer for chairman of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | $2,000 annual retainer for Executive Committee members
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  | $2,000 for each Board meeting and Committee meeting attended
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

Stock
Compensation

Beginning in 2006, non-employee directors, other than Mr. Evans, shall be awarded, on the date of the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, an annual grant of restricted stock units (RSUs) for shares of Company common stock having a value of approximately $15,000 on the date of grant. The RSUs vest in full on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders
or upon a change in control of the Company. The shares of stock represented by vested RSUs are delivered to the director upon cessation of his service on the Board. All unvested RSUs are forfeited upon cessation of a directors service on the
Board for any reason. To put the non-employee directors, other than Mr. Evans, in a comparable position as if RSUs had been granted on the date of the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director, other than Mr. Evans,
received a grant of 1,710 RSUs on January 23, 2006, with a value of approximately $15,000, based on the fair market value of Company common stock on that date of $8.775. These RSUs vest on April 24, 2006, the date of the 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.

The Company reimburses its directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and
Committee meetings.