alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lassen County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lassen County Resource Advsiory will meet in Susanville, 
CA. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural 
Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in 
compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The business 
meeting is in preparation for the next funding cycle.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 10, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 12 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lassen National Forest 
Supervisor's Office in the Caribou Conference Room at 2550 Riverside 
Drive, Susanville, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Perry, Public Affairs Officer 
for the Lassen National Forest at 530-252-6604 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caa2baafb8b8b38aacb9e4acafaee4bfb9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6ced6c3d4d4dfe6c0d588c0c3c288d3d5">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: October 15, 2010.
Jerry Bird,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-26891 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH MAGGIO.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 4.397

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 175484 dated May 31, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services for voice

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

ProgTech-Yug

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1102301003530

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

2301075500

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

140, Vladimirskaya str., Krasnodar territory, Anapa district, Anapa, 353454

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 12, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 11, 2019 No. 401-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VERNON HARRIS.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Crew pose for portrait while training at KSC

S86-30460 (9 Jan. 1986) --- NASA's STS-51L crew members pose for photographs during a break in countdown training at the White Room, Launch Complex 39, Pad B. Left to right are Teacher-in-Space payload specialist Sharon Christa McAuliffe; payload specialist Gregory Jarvis; and astronauts Judith A. Resnik, mission specialist; Francis R. (Dick) Scobee, mission commander; Ronald E. McNair, mission specialist; Mike J. Smith, pilot; and Ellison S. Onizuka, mission specialist.    EDITOR'S NOTE: The STS-51L crew lost their lives in an explosion, onboard the space shuttle Challenger, following launch Jan. 28, 1986. Photo credit: NASA

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s86-30460/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJanuary 9, 1986ProducerJSCSize1920x1309pxPIA NumberS86-30460The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 20, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
1

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1111

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Tabatha A. Veasley, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 30, 2010

Filed: October 6, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Tabatha Veasley pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess

with intent to distribute at least 5 grams of a mixture or substance containing cocaine

base, the district court1

 sentenced her at the bottom of the applicable guideline range

to 27 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. This appeal followed, in

which counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the crack-to-powder cocaine ratio in the guidelines is unsound, and that

the court’s strict application of the guidelines resulted in an unreasonable sentence.
-2-

In a supplemental pro se brief, Veasley argues that her sentence is too high, she did

not understand the guidelines, and she signed the plea agreement based on her

counsel’s promise that he would fight for a shorter sentence. We affirm.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Veasley’s sentence is not unreasonable,

see United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard

of review); United States v. Valadez, 573 F.3d 553, 556 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam)

(presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Watson, 480 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th

Cir. 2007) (discussing abuse of sentencing discretion); and we note that the court

expressly acknowledged its discretion to vary from the guideline range. Further, if

counsel is raising a constitutional argument about the crack and powder cocaine ratios

in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b), that argument fails. See United States v. Fenner, 600 F.3d

1014, 1024-25 (8th Cir. 2010). To the extent that Veasley seeks to set aside her guilty

plea based on her misunderstanding of the guidelines and of promises that her counsel

made to her during plea negotiations, this matter is not properly raised for the first

time on appeal. See United States v. Murphy, 899 F.2d 714, 716 (8th Cir. 1990)

(claim that guilty plea was involuntary is not cognizable on direct appeal unless first

presented to district court). 

Finally, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

we affirm.

______________________________
3 min read

# Floyd L. Thompson Technical Library (Building 1194)

### Julia L. Bradshaw

Apr 05, 2022

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

# **Quick Facts**

**Year Built:** 1942 

**Historic Eligibility:** National Register Eligible  

# History

Building 1194 underwent many alterations and occupant changes during its 80 years of service. Construction began Oct. 5, 1941, and was completed on Aug. 22, 1942. It was placed into operation the following month.  

The building was used initially to house the West Area’s sheet metal shop, machine shop, model finishing shop and technical service office. For some years it was known as either the “Main Shop” or “West Shop.” Other tenants included some of the first branches of engineering in Langley’s West Area.  

In the late 1940s, part of the building served as the garage and into the 1960s there were operating gas pumps located at the east end of the building. In the mid-1950s, the Equipment Engineering Section occupied the second floor and the electric shop occupied part of the first, remaining there until the mid-1960s. These were joined early in the 1960s by the element of the Fabrication Division’s electronic shop. 

The original building covered a ground area of 13,125 square feet and was constructed of a steel framework. The building was set on pile footings, with 16-inch-thick brick walls and heavily reinforced six-inch-thick concrete floors. 

Over the years, as the shops moved to more modern and suitable facilities, the building underwent internal remodeling. In 1960 it was remodeled to accommodate space personnel, and remodeled again in 1964 to house elements of the Research Models and Facilities Division. 

In the late 1960s a mezzanine, supported by steel bridge beams, was added and there was a major renovation of the second floor to house the technical library, which had previously been located in Building 1244. The move of the technical library took place in August 1969, but renovations continued until the formal dedication almost three years later. In 1977, a two-story 69- by 34-foot addition, Building 1194A the West Area Training Facility, was constructed on the north side of the building.  

On Dec. 7, 1978, the library was dedicated to Dr. Floyd L. Thompson who had served as Langley’s center director from 1960 to 1968 and had passed away in 1976.  

The last addition to Building 1194 was completed in the spring of 1991, completing the extension of the building’s south face.  

In November 2019, the Technical Library relocated to a newly renovated area of the 2nd floor in Building 1268A. Demolition of Building 1194 began in 2021. 

Search the NASA Technical Reports Server for additional information. 

# Related Materials

            - Original Floorplan
            - 1989 Floorplan
            - General view of buildings in Langley’s West Area in 1942. Building 1194 appears as, “#13, West Shop.”
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RANDY ALLEN BLOCK.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
## I

N T H E C O U R

T O F C R I M I N A L A P P EA L S O F T EX A S N O . A P - 75, 872
EX PA R TE JUA N A . FU EN TE S , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 1 1 4 - 0 2 9 6 - 0 7 - A I N T HE 1 1 4 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM S M I TH CO UNTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the p ro v i s i o n s of Article 11.07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d

82 4, 82 6 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). App lic ant w a s c on vic te d o f e ng a g ingin org anized criminal ac tivity and se n t en ce d to fifty

y ear s’ imprisonment. His direct appe al was dismiss ed as untimely
. Fuentes v . State, No. 12-07-00349- CR (Te x . App. – Tyler, October 11, 2007, no pet.). Ap pli c ant c on tends th a t his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e he fa ile d to timely file a notice of appe al.Followinga hea ring , the trial cour

t has deter

mined that trial counsel f ai l ed t o t i m ely

file a notice of appea l. We f

ind, theref

ore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

time appea l of the judg ment of convic ti o n i n C ause No. 114-0296-07- A from the 114th J udicial District Court of Smit h County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a
wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l so that he may the n, wi th t he a id o f c ouns e l, o bta in a me anin g fu l a

pp e a l. All time lim its shall be calculated as if the se ntence had bee n imposed on t h e date on which the
mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old

that, s ho uld

Ap pli c ant d e sir e to p ro se c ute an a pp e a l, he mus t take a ffirmative s t eps to file a written notice of a ppeal in the tria l court within 30 day s after the
mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. Applicant' s remainingclaims are dismiss ed. Se e Ex pa rteTorre

s, 943 S. W. 2 d

4 6 9 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: Marc h 19, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 6-11-2007 

# In Re: C a r r ol l P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-2404

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" I n Re: C a r r o l l " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 961. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/9611

H L D - 96 ( J une, 2007) NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N O
. 07- 2404

________________ IN R E : A L L E N W IL B U R N C A R R O L L , Pet i t i oner

____________________________________ O n a Pet i t i on forW r i t of M andamus fr om t he U ni t ed St at es D i s t r i ctC our t fort he East er n D i s t r i ctof Penns y l vani a

( R el at ed t o C i v N o. 06- cv- 4502)

______________ Sub mi t t e d Unde r Rul e 21 , Fe d. R. A pp . P.

J une 1, 2007 Be f o r e : SCI RI CA , CH I EF J UD GE, W EI S a n d GA RTH , CI RCU I T J UD GES (F il ed : Ju n e 11 , 2 0 0 7 )

_______________________ OP I NI ON

_______________________ P E R C U R I A M.

Pr o s e pet i t i onerA l l en W i l bur n C ar r ol l s eeks a w r i t of m andamus t o compel t he U ni t ed St at es D i s t r i ctC our t fort he East er n D i s t r i ctof Penns y l vani a t o r ul e upon t he D ef en d an t’ s m o ti o n to d ism iss. T h e D ist ri ct C o u rten tered an o rde r gra n ti n g D ef en d an t’ s
m ot i on t o di s m i s s on M ay8, 2007. T her efor e, w e w i l l denyt he pet i t i on forw r i t of
m a n d a m u s a s m o o t.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,

Appellant

v.

AISIN SEIKI CO., LTD., TOYOTA MOTOR 

CORPORATION, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., 

INC.,

Appellees

______________________

2019-1800, 2019-1801

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-

01494, IPR2017-01539, IPR2018-00440, IPR2018-00444.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

PAUL A. STEWART, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, 

LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

EDWARD M. CANNON, DAVID GERARD JANKOWSKI. 

 ROBERT CARTER MATTSON, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & 

Neustadt, Alexandria, VA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd. also represented by JOHN SHERMAN 

KERN, ERIC W. SCHWEIBENZ. 

Case: 19-1800 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 03/23/2020
 JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, 

Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee 

Toyota Motor Corporation. Also represented by JOSHUA 

GOLDBERG, WILLIAM PRATT, DAVID REESE. 

 JOHN CARACAPPA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Also 

represented by JAMES RICHARD NUTTALL, Chicago, IL. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 23, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1800 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 03/23/2020
Roman Home
- About the Mission 
- Why is Roman Important? 
- Who is Nancy Grace Roman? 
- Frequently Asked Questions 
- Mission Timeline 
- Partners 
- Meet the Team 

- Dark Energy 
- Dark Matter 
- Exoplanets 
- Large Area Near-Infrared Surveys 
- Observing with Roman 
- General Investigator Program 
- For Scientists 

- Roman Observatory 
- Wide Field Instrument  
- Coronagraph Instrument 
- Interactive Telescope Diagram 

- In the News 
- Find an Event 
- Mission Timeline 
- Social Media 
- Media Resources 

- Learning with Roman 
- Roman's Flickr Photo Gallery 
- Printable Resources 
- Visualizations 
- Roman Observer Video Game 

Roman Home

Investigate Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Exoplanets, and Other Mysteries

HOW

Roman's Instruments and What They Can Do

NEWS

Roman Telescope Updates

## Roman Stories

Explore All Roman Stories

ArticleArticleArticle4 weeks agoArticle1 month agoArticle1 month agoHardware Highlight : Fall 2023Roman Quarterly Hardware Highlight : Fall 2023 [ View full feature ]NASA's Goddard Space Flight CenterSpacecraft InteractiveExplore Roman
View the Roman Space Telescope from every angle, check the completion status, and discover where the pieces are being built.
View the Roman InteractiveFeatured StoryHow NASA’s Roman Space Telescope Will Chronicle the Active Cosmos
NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will pair space-based observations with a broad field of view to unveil the dynamic…
Read the StoryKeep ExploringDiscover More Topics From NASA
James Webb Space Telescope

Exoplanets

Hubble Space Telescope

Galaxies
Return to topThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA- 
- 
- 
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IG
- Budget & Annual Reports
- Agency Financial Reports
- Contact NASA
- Accessibility
- Page Last Updated: 2 months ago
- Page Editor: SMD Content Editors
- Responsible NASA Official for Science: Dana Bolles
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1842

_____________________________

TORREY D. WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

HUMAN RELATIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

December 6, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses this appeal as premature. See Hinote v. 

Ford Motor Co., 958 So. 2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Torrey D. Walker, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5

<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                 2,030,158
<SECURITIES>                           1,508,550
<RECEIVABLES>                            761,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                  21
<INVENTORY>                              706,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       5,321,223
<PP&E>                                 1,584,192
<DEPRECIATION>                           393,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         6,620,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    548,477
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  59,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             5,411,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           6,620,367
<SALES>                                1,470,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,470,055
<CGS>                                    442,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            442,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,152,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (6,988)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (150,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                               3,366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (154,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (154,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.03)


</TABLE>