alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2013

NO. 03-10-00756-CV

Ellen E. Abernathy, Appellant

v.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in Trust for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of 

Soundview Home Loan Trust 2005-OPT1, Asset-Backed Certificates Series OPT1, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTON, ROSE, AND ABOUSSIE*

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ABOUSSIE

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial 

court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s 

judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating 

to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

* Before Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
# Sitemap

## May 19, 2020

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2020
- 05
- May 19, 2020

            - APL Receives DART Spacecraft Structure and Ramps Up Integration and Testing
            - National Space Council Meeting, May 19, 2020
            - NASA Remembers Annie Glenn
            - NASA’s Curiosity Rover Finds Clues to Chilly Ancient Mars Buried in Rocks
            - Nighttime View of Space Launch System on Mobile Launcher
            - Space Launch System Launches to the Moon
            - Space Launch System in Flight
            - Space Launch System Block 1B Cargo Expanded View
            - Space Launch System Block 1B Cargo Configuration
            - Why ESA and NASA’s SOHO Spacecraft Spots So Many Comets
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
Ecker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Octus Inc.  for
the period ending March 31, 2009  fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Octus Inc. of Nevada.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
                        
                        
                        /s/
      George EckerGeorge
      Ecker
                          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Principal
Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  August 14, 2009                        By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                     Arthur I. Trueger
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL FLYNN.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Ground Terminal

The Near Space Network Second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Ground Terminal at the White Sands Complex in New Mexico.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/photo_wsgt2-2/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- WebMod Grandfathered
Image CreditNASASize2710x1773pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Feb 22, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

October 14, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00491

- CR

Ex Parte Jessica CASTILLO

, Appellant

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 475264 Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an appeal from an order denying an application for a writ of hab eas corpus based on a claim of double jeopardy. On September 29, 2015, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record. On October 1, 2015, we ordered appellant to file written proof, within ten days of our order, that either (1) the reporter’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) the appellant wa s entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. On October 9, 2015, appellant filed a letter in response to our order. In the letter, appellant explains that she has pleaded guilty to DWI in the underlying trial court case, and agreed to a term of probation to run concurrent with trial court cause numbers 458109 and 458110 (appellate court case number 04

- 15

- 00207

- CR and 04

- 15

- 00208

- CR), and appellant’s sentencing is set for November 13, 2015. Appellant further states that she intends to dismiss this appeal once her sentencing takes place, and requests that this appeal be abated pending sentencing in the trial court.

Appellant’s request for an abatement of this appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is ABATED. All appellate deadlines are suspended pen ding further order of this court. Appellant is ORDERED to advise this court in writing of the status of appellant’s sentencing no later than December 1, 2015

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8214** 

STEVEN CUPP , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff; CECIL NICHOLS; JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden; DEBRA RANKIN; KUMA DEBOO; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins
. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. ( 2:08

- cv - 00060

- REM

- JSK )

Submitted : Ju ly 2 7 , 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Cupp appeals t he district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and d ismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reve rsible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cupp v. Brown , No. 2:08

- cv - 00060

- REM

- JSK (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 3, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2014-LC17 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

/s/Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1921

EUGENE T. HOLMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. P. BRIENZG,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

COLONEL FORD; J. B. HELTON; M. K. SHELOR;

MONICA STEWART; A. S. MAUNEY; SERGEANT

SCHALENGAUF; CAPTAIN BESS; CAPTAIN BUIE; LOYDE

BLACK; BUDDY SMITH; DAVE STEWART; CHUCK

WOMACK; GASTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CA-02-354-3-1-V)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Raymond Thompson,

STOTT, HOLLOWELL, PALMER & WINDHAM, Gastonia, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Eugene T. Holmes appeals from the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

several of Holmes’s claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order

appealed from is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### GEORGE PRATT v. ROSE DI PASQUALE JAMES.

February 27, 1987.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-10-030]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: October 26, 2010 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1174 and 1175 (Final)(Seamless Refined Copper 
Pipe and Tube from China and Mexico)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and 
Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
November 8, 2010.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. GC-10-161 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-413 (Certain 
Rare-Earth Magnets and Magnetic Materials and Articles Containing 
Same).
    (2) Document No. GC-10-184 concerning approval of annual Federal 
Register notice on investigations of APO and rules violations completed 
in calendar year 2009.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 19, 2010.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2010-26816 Filed 10-20-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1939

Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CA-001455-O

_____________________________

FANIOLA CHRISTIANT,

Appellant, 

v.

CLAUDINEI RAVANELI,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Jeffrey L. Ashton, Judge.

June 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Chad A. Barr, of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. 

Daniel S. Liebowitz, William Talley, and Katherine N. Kmiec, of Cruser, Mitchell, 

Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston and Zimet, LLP, Orlando, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
**usbank****Annual Statement of Compliance****Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18***VIA: EMAIL*Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 1585 Broadway New York, New York 10036 Attention: Stephen Holmes stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com Re: Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  dated  as  of  September  1,  2014  (the  "Agreement")  between Morgan  Stanley  Capital  I  Inc.,  as  Depositor,  Wells  Fargo  Bank,  National  Association,  as  the Master  Servicer,  Rialto  Capital  Advisors,  LLC,  as  the  Special  Servicer,  Park  Bridge  Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian. I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:           (1) A review of the activities of the  Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the  "Reporting  Period") and  of the  performance  of  the  Certificate  Administrator  under the  Agreement has been made under my supervision; and           (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. Date: March 10, 2016 U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator By:  /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs Kimberly O. Jacobs Senior Vice President
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">DAC Medical, P.C./Timothy Mosomillo, D.O., as Assignee of Nancy Cirillo, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered January 24, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Upon a review of the record, we agree with the Civil Court's determination that there is a triable issue of fact regarding the medical necessity of the services at issue (<i>see Zuckerman v City of New York</i>, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed. </p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: September 15, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65585-65586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0323; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-106]


Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lancaster, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on July 22, 2010 which proposed to establish Class E airspace 
at Weeks Medical Center Heliport, Lancaster, NH. The NPRM is being 
withdrawn as a portion of the proposed airspace already exists. A new 
rulemaking will be forthcoming to correctly establish the new airspace.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 22, 2010, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register to 
establish Class E airspace at Lancaster, NH to accommodate special 
standard instrument approach procedures for Weeks Medical Center 
Heliport. (75 FR 42630) Docket No. FAA-2010-0323. After publication the 
FAA found that the airspace description in the proposed rule 
incorrectly included existing controlled airspace 1,200 feet above the 
surface. To avoid confusion, this proposed rule is being withdrawn and 
will be established under another rulemaking.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of

[[Page 65586]]

Proposed Rulemaking, Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-106, as published in 
the Federal Register on July 22, 2010 (75 FR 42630) (FR Doc. 2010-
0323), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 15, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-26943 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50309 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. EZEQUIEL GARCIA

- GARCIA , also known as Ezequiel Chuck Garcia,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 2643

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ezequiel Garcia

- Garcia (Garcia) appeals the 18

- month within

- guidelines sentence h e received following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Gar cia challenges the substantive reasonab leness of his sentence, urging that it is greater than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He maintains that the presumption of reasonableness should not apply because U.S.S.G.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 5, 2015

Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 14-50309 Document: 00512889165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2015No. 14

- 50309 § 2L1.2 is not supported by empirical data, ackn owledging that the argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 366

- 67 (5th Cir. 2009). Although Garcia concedes that this court applies plain error review when a defendant fails to object to the reasonableness of the sente nce in the district court, he nevertheless contends that the proper standard of review is abuse of discretion. Because he did not raise his challenge to the reasonableness of his sentence in the district court, review is limited to plain error. See Unite d States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391

- 92 (5th Cir. 2007). Garcia has not demonstrated any plain error in connection with his sentence. T he district court considered his mitigation arguments, concluding that a sentence at the low end of the applicable gui delines range was sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to satisfy the sentencing goals set forth in § 3553(a). Garcia has not shown that the district court failed to give proper weight to any particular § 3553(a) factor or that his sentence represe nts a “clear error of judgment in balancing sentencing factors.” United States v. Cooks , 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). To the extent that he seeks to have this court reweigh the § 3553(a) factors, this court will not do so

. See Gall v. United State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. Garcia’ s arguments that § 2L1.2 lacks an empirical basis and that he returned primarily because he has lived in the United States for almost all of his life are insufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness. See United States v. Gomez

- Herrera , 523 F.3d 554, 565

- 66 (5th Cir. 2008)

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-50309 Document: 00512889165 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2015
# Sitemap

## August 1983

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1983
- August 1983

            - 01
# Sitemap

## March 20, 2018

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2018
- 03
- March 20, 2018

            - Expedition 55-56 Crew Answers Questions at Press Conference
            - Expedition 55-56 Crew Waves Bye after Press Conference
            - Expedition 55-56 Crew Portrait after Press Conference
            - Expedition 55-56 Crew Portrait after Press Conference
            - NASA to Launch Parachute Test off Virginia Coast March 27
            - NASA to Preview Upcoming US Spacewalk, Provide Live Coverage
            - Space Station Bound!
            - Kilopower
            - Kilopower
            - Western Australia Experiencing Bushfire Outbreak
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALVIN DANIELS.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.