alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 415 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 29, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3004) to 

amend section 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

relating to reentry of removed aliens. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

(2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

July 3, 2017, through July 10, 2017— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 
2 

•HRES 415 EH 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

SEC. 4. It shall be in order without intervention of any 

point of order to consider concurrent resolutions providing for 

adjournment during the month of July, 2017. 

SEC. 5. The Committee on Appropriations may, at any 

time before 5 p.m. on Thursday, July 6, 2017, file privileged 

reports to accompany measures making appropriations for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. 

SEC. 6. The Committee on Armed Services may, at any 

time before 5 p.m. on Thursday, July 6, 2017, file a report 

to accompany H.R. 2810. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,872

EX PARTE JUAN A. FUENTES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 114-0296-07-A IN THE 114 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in

organized criminal activity and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. His direct appeal was

dismissed as untimely. Fuentes v. State, No. 12-07-00349-CR (Tex. App. – Tyler, October 11, 2007,

no pet.).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 
Following a hearing, the trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a

notice of appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 114-0296-07-A from the 114th Judicial

District Court of Smith County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a

written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal.

All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the

mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must

take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: March 19, 2008

Do Not Publish
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT JACKSON.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51084 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

v.
CHADRICK WATERS, also known as Chadrick Damon Waters , Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 331

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Chadrick Waters has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Waters has filed a response

. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Waters’s claim of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 17, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51084 Document: 00514242610 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2017No. 16

- 51084

2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F. 3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Waters ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Our review reveals a clerical error in the judgment, which fails to reflect the dismissal of certain counts of the indictment and supers eding indictment. The record shows that Waters was convicted and sentenced on Count Four of the superseding indictment and that the remaining counts were dismissed. The amended judgment should therefore reflect that the remaining counts were dismissed on the Government’s motion. See United States v. Powell , 354 F.3d 362, 371

- 72 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Waters’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998)

. The case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 36. Case: 16-51084 Document: 00514242610 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2017
#### Howell et al., Appellants, *v.*French, Appellee.

(No. 4007

Decided January 10, 1944.)

*Messrs. Geer, Lane & Downing,*for appellant Harold A. King.

*Mrs. Eva Epstein Shaw,*for appellant Helen R. Zadra, individually and as executrix.

*Mr. Dan E. McCullough,*for appellee.

*Mr. Benjamin E. Fisher, amicus curiae.*

Stuart, J.

This case comes into this court on appeal on questions of law from an order of the Common Pleas Court of Lucas county, vacating its former order confirming a sheriff’s sale.

In the action below, a decree was entered foreclosing a mortgage and judgment lien upon certain real estate. Various orders of sale were issued to the sheriff. Although service of summons had been made upon the defendant, Alberta French, the owner of the real estate who had assumed and agreed to pay the mort*258gage, she was in default for answer or demurrer to the petition and cross-petition. Other than to apply for relief under the so-called Best Act, she made no appearance on the merits or as to the issues, until June-1, 1943, when she filed the motion here involved to vacate and set aside the confirmation of the sheriff’s sale..

On September 30, 1942, the sheriff made his return of a sale to Helen R. Zadra. On October 14, 1942, a motion to confirm the sale was filed and an order of' the court confirming the sale was entered on the journal of the court on May 25, 1943, a deed and distribution were ordered and a conveyance was made by the-sheriff. On June 1, 1943, Alberta French filed her motion to vacate confirmation of the sale, which was-granted, and it is of this action of the court that appellants King and Zadra complain.

As appears from the record, this sale was in all respects regular and according to law, and upon its confirmation and the delivery of the sheriff’s deed the-rights of the purchaser became fixed and vested, and,, in the absence of fraud or irregularity, such rights-could not thereafter be divested except by the act of the purchaser. ■

A purchaser at a judicial sale has certain rights-which the court is bound to protect equally with the-rights of the parties to the action. Neither disputes nor differences between the parties to the case, nor events occurring subsequent to the sale and confirmation, can affect the rights of the purchaser. The exercise of a sound discretion requires that these rights be-recognized and protected by the courts.

*Judgment reversed, and cause remanded..*

Lloyu and Carpenter-, JJ.. concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Gordon Link, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofTapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

(a)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarterly period ended September 27, 2006 of the Company to whichthis certification is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

(b)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 30, 2007

|            |       | /s/ GORDON  LINK                                       |
|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | ** ** | **Gordon Link**                                        |
| ** ** | ** ** | **Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer** |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. Thiscertification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the annual report of Cozumel Corporation
(the  "Company)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,  2002,  Jehu
Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The annual  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  annual  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jehu Hand

Jehu Hand
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive and financial officer
September 1, 2004





<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
        
<S>                                                     <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  9,135
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             429
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             4,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       15,810
<PP&E>                                                 18,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                          4,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         30,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,173
<BONDS>                                                 6,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                             4,025
<COMMON>                                                  125
<OTHER-SE>                                             13,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           30,627
<SALES>                                                 3,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,721
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          12,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,595
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .09
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; HIV/AIDS Behavioral Treatment Intervention and Services Development-Member Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         November 12, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Enid Light, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6132, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-443-3599,                         *elight@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 18, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26959 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATIONS**     OnNovember 14, 2006, Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) with the Securities and ExchangeCommission. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the following certifications are being made to accompany the Form 10-Q:**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 14, 2006 /s/ James L. Fares   James L. Fares   Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 14, 2006 /s/ George Stuart   George Stuart   Chief Financial Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huntsman International Holdings LLC (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  | HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC
| |  | -----------------------------------
| |  | By:                                

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Huntsman International Holdings LLC and will be retained by Huntsman International Holdings LLC and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
# Sitemap

## October 28, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 10
- October 28, 2010

            - NASA Celebrates 10th Anniversary Of Space Station With Crew News Conference And New Web Content
            - Dark Reflections in the Southern Cross
#### In re David B. WOYCECHOWSKY.

No. 03-1416.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Aug. 20, 2003.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of parties’ joint motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

> (1) The motion is granted.*

> (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 We note that parties request that this dismissal be without prejudice, however, it is not the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL REESE.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 3, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 296

Lower Tribunal No. F19

- 6448

________________



### Pablo Lyle

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Marisa

Tinkler Mendez , Judge.

Mar k us/Moss PLLC and David Oscar Markus and Mona E. Markus , for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J.

, and MILLER and LOBREE

, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**David Woods**
NASA History Series

The photo above of David and Anne Woods was taken by Steve Garber of the NASA HQ History Office at the Awards Ceremony.  David is the one with the Award and Anne is the one with the smile.

More recently, David and colleagues have undertaken the mammoth task of compiling the **Apollo Flight Journal**, which covers all aspects of the Apollo missions not covered in the ALSJ.

The photo below shows David observing the 2003 Transit of Mercury at his home in Glasgow.