alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Furman v. E. T. Furman, Highway Commissioner, and Charles Braugh, Clerk, of the Township of Dover.

*JSigluvays*— Discontinuance—Jurisdiction.

Proceedings for discontinuing a highway are void unless it appears from the return of the commissioner that he viewed the premises, and determined the public necessity for such discontinuance.

*Certiorari*to review proceedings for discontinuing a highway.

Argued June 3, 1891.

Proceedings quashed July 3, 1891.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Watts, Bean & Smith,*for petitioner.

Morse, J.

*Certiorari*to review proceedings taken to discontinue a highway.

The proceedings must be quashed. The record of the commissioner’s action, as found in the office of the township clerk, and all the record made as shown by the return of the commissioner, fails to show that he ever viewed the premises, or determined the public necessity of discontinuing the highway. The record shows a meeting at the house of one George Deline, in Dover, and an adjournment. In the record of this meeting, or the adjourned one, there is no statement of any viewing .of the premises; and, although the commissioner may have meant to return that he determined the public necessity of a discontinuance of the highway, he has not done so, as will be seen by an inspection of such return, which is given below:

> “I, the undersigned, commissioner of highways of the *392township of Dover, in the county of Lenawee, do hereby certify and return at the adjournment meeting, held at the house of Geo. Deline, on the 16th day of February, 1891, that in pursuance of the application hereto attached of Geo. H. Deline, I. N. Warren, Levi J. Deline, J. H. Hawkins, S. N. Palmer, Mathew Garrison, Aaron Jones, M. Jj. Davis, D. H. Warren, Lewis B. Oanniff, Arthur Bovee, Hiram Deline, Milo Bovee, Arthur Manchester, and Ephram Palmer, all of whom are freeholders of the said township, for the discontinuing of the highway therein, known and described as follows: Commencing one-half mile south of the north-east corner of section thirty-two (32); running west one mile, to section line between sections thirty-one (31) and thirty-two (32); which application was presented to I. N. Warren, Levi Deline, Henry Hawkins, Geo. Deline, and Stillwell Palmer; that the discontinuing of said highway was necessary and proper, and the same was thereupon discontinued by me.

> “E. T. Furman,

> *“*Commissioner of Highways of the Town of Dover.”

We have repeatedly held that it must appear of record that the premises were viewed by the commissioner, and that he found a public necessity for his action. The return that he laid out or discontinued a highway is not sufficient. That fact does not carry with it the presumption that he determined that there was a public necessity for so doing.

The proceedings are quashed, but without costs.

The other Justices concurred.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 8, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. 

JAMES LYLE HERRON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-1576

(D.C. Nos. 1:07-CV-00776-LTB &

1:03-CR-00161-LTB-1) 

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this matter is granted. 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9) and

42.1. The dismissal does not affect appeal No. 09-1532.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1576 Document: 01018344456 Date Filed: 01/08/2010 Page: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 38

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that offices 
 attached to the seat of Government should not be required to exercise 
               their offices in the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2017

Mr. Chaffetz submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that offices 
 attached to the seat of Government should not be required to exercise 
               their offices in the District of Columbia.

Whereas section 72 of title 4, United States Code, requires all offices attached 
        to the seat of Government to be exercised in the District of Columbia;
Whereas with the development of modern communication technologies and the 
        increased ease of travel, Federal agencies are able to perform their 
        duties from areas outside the District of Columbia;
Whereas based on the information collected by the 2010 United States Census, 
        there is a correlation between the centralization of Federal agencies in 
        the District of Columbia and the median income of the metropolitan area 
        of the District of Columbia, which is higher than the median income of 
        the United States;
Whereas Federal agencies employ thousands of individuals and provide jobs and 
        economic benefits to the areas in which the agencies are located;
Whereas the focus of many Federal agencies involves industries located in areas 
        across the United States and outside the District of Columbia; and
Whereas the impact of regulations can be perceived more easily by those 
        individuals who are proximate to the affected industries: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes that it is no longer necessary for all 
        Federal agencies to be located in the District of Columbia;
            (2) determines that Executive agencies, as defined in 
        section 105 of title 5, United States Code, and military 
        departments, as defined in section 102 of such title, should be 
        relocated outside the District of Columbia; and
            (3) calls on the head of each Executive agency and military 
        department to recommend appropriate alternate locations 
        throughout the United States to which their respective agency 
        or military department can be relocated.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TERRY SMITH.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
2 min read

# ScienceCraft for Outer Planet Exploration (SCOPE)

### Loura Hall

May 01, 2024

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Mahmooda Sultana***NASA Goddard Space Flight Center*

Missions to the outer solar system are an important part of NASA’s goals because these scarcely visited worlds, particularly the ice giants Neptune and Uranus, hold secrets about the formation and evolution of our solar system and countless others. However, due to the high cost, long travel time and narrow window for mission implementation, outer solar system exploration has been extremely limited in more than 60 years of space exploration. In this NIAC, we are developing a mission architecture that addresses all of these challenges by using a ScienceCraft and enables science missions at the outer planet system. Sciencraft integrates a science instrument and spacecraft into one monolithic and lightweight structure. By printing an ultra-lightweight quantum dot-based spectrometer, developed by the PI Sultana, directly on the solar sail we create a breakthrough spacecraft architecture allowing an unprecedented parallelism and throughput of data collection, and rapid travel across the solar system. Unlike conventional solar sails that serve only to propel small cubesats, ScienceCraft puts its area at use for spectroscopy, pushing the boundary of scientific exploration of the outer solar system. ScienceCraft offers an attractive low resource platform that can enable science missions at a significantly lower cost and provide a large number of launch opportunities as a secondary payload. By leveraging these benefits, we propose a mission concept to Triton, a unique planetary body in our solar system, within the short window that closes around 2045 to answer compelling science questions about Triton’s atmosphere, ionosphere, plumes and internal structure. 

In Phase I, we performed an end-to-end feasibility study for a Neptune-Triton mission using a ScienceCraft, as well as identifying the key technologies needed for such a mission and tall poles that we need to address. As part of phase II, we plan to further mature the mission concept, develop and demonstrate some of the key technologies, address the tall poles identified in phase I and develop a roadmap for implementing SCOPE.

**2024 Phase I Selection**

## Discover More NIAC Topics

Space Technology Mission Directorate

NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts

NIAC Funded Studies

About NIAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v.
ROLAND GATHRIGHT, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 118 EAL 2014
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Unpublished Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court at No. 2065 EDA 2012 filed February 12, 2014, affirming the Order of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas at No. CP-51-CR-0001034-2009 filed June 20, 2012

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 14th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED , the order of the Superior Court is VACATED , and the case is REMANDEDfor consideration by the trial court consistent with Commonwealth v. Carrasquillo , 115 A.3d 1284, 1292 (Pa. 2015) (holding “a defendant’s innocence claim must be at least plausible to demonstrate, in and of itself, a fair and just reason for presentence withdrawal of a plea” and “the proper inquiry on consideration of such a withdrawal motion is whether the accused has made some colorable demonstration, under the circumstances, such that permitting withdrawal of the plea would promote fairness and justice”). Jurisdiction relinquished.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALEX IRIZZARY.

November 3, 1986.

The Court having reviewed the sentencing transcript and the arguments of counsel, and the Court being of the view that the sentencing judge mistakenly construed *N.J.S.A.*2C:43-6(c) to require the imposition of a parole ineligibility term that was one-half of the total sentence imposed on defendant;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded for resentencing, at which time the sentencing judge shall fix an appropriate minimum parole ineligibility term that pursuant to the statute, is “at, or between, one-third and one-half of the [nine-year] sentence imposed by the court.”

Jurisdiction is not retained.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6



Severance Provisions of Employment Agreement with Martin G. King (effective May 1, 2020). 


Martin G. King will be entitled to the following severance provisions if his employment is terminated without Cause:


-  Mr. King will receive a lump sum cash payment determined based on his years of service, equivalent to 18 months of his base salary, plus his prorated incentive compensation award; 
-  Mr. King’s restricted share units will vest fully, and his performance share units will vest as scheduled and certified by the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company; and
-  Mr. King will receive a lump sum cash payment equivalent to 18 months of his base salary upon compliance with a 24-month non-competition period following the termination date.


Any severance under this agreement is subject to the Company’s clawback policy. 

Cause is defined in the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017 as Exhibit B to the proxy statement.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 28, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 475 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-235926) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 28, 2020
# NASA Astronaut and Expedition 69 Flight Engineer Frank Rubio Performs Crew Quarters Blanket Inspection

NASA astronaut and Expedition 69 Flight Engineer Frank Rubio poses for a photo as he inspects blankets and blanket covers in crew quarters for future replacements.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/53044749507-ec01f0cd33-o-1/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x694pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jul 31, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000891461
<NAME>                        GREENWICH-AIR-SERVICES
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         497
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,149)
<INVENTORY>                                    346,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               503,712
<PP&E>                                         149,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,957)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 656,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          199,177
<BONDS>                                        160,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       167
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   656,137
<SALES>                                        187,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,547
<CGS>                                          162,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.32
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.00
<CASH>                                             2,230
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        585
<ALLOWANCES>                                         116
<INVENTORY>                                        1,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,006
<PP&E>                                             8,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (7,009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     6,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              8,289
<BONDS>                                            1,131
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              38
<OTHER-SE>                                        (2,488)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       6,971
<SALES>                                               53
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      53
<CGS>                                                 13
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         13
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (3,034)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (7,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (7,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (7,671)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0





</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32


Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019 on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019, does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund 2019.


Date:March 17, 2022/s/ Mathew S. BloomMATTHEW S. BLOOMChief Executive OfficerDate:March 17, 2022/s/ Michael GussMICHAEL GUSSChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26945]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0321; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-104]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Wolfeboro, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on July 22, 2010 which proposed to establish Class E airspace 
at Huggins Hospital, Wolfeboro, NH. The NPRM is being withdrawn as a 
portion of the proposed airspace already exists. A new rulemaking will 
be forthcoming to correctly establish the new airspace.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 22, 2010, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register to 
establish Class E airspace at Wolfeboro, NH to accommodate special 
standard instrument approach procedure for Huggins Hospital (75 FR 
42631) Docket No. FAA-2010-0321. After publication the FAA found that 
the airspace description in the proposed rule incorrectly included 
existing controlled airspace 1,200 feet above the surface. To avoid 
confusion this proposed rule is being withdrawn and will be established 
under another rulemaking.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-104, as published in 
the Federal Register on July 22, 2010 (75 FR 42631) (FR Doc. 2010-
0321), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 15, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-26945 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
MLP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0485

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORY LEVI GOODMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including June 5, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 4 2023

05/04/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0485
# NASA Administrator Speaks with ISS Crew about Science

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, left, and Lisa Carnell, director of NASA’s Biological and Physical Sciences Division are seen during an Earth-to-space call with Expedition 70 crew members Andreas Mogenson of ESA, Jasmin Moghbeli of NASA, and Satoshi Furukawa of JAXA aboard the International Space Station, visible on monitor to the right, Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2024, at the Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters building in Washington.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/53543503076-0f42bc0273-k/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareImage CreditNASA/Joel KowskySize2047x1041pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Feb 21, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman