alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Allison, Assignee, *v.*Hedges.

The objection that a defendant in a justice’s Court was sued out of the proper township is waived, unless made before the justice.

Friday, *May*28.

ERROR to the *Allen*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

This was an action on a promissory note, commenced before á justice of the peace, and taken by ap*547peal to the Circuit Court. The parties appeared before the justice, and the cause was continued. The defendant not appearing on the day set for trial, judgment went against him by default. In the Circuit Court, the plaintiff having established his cause of action under the general issue, the .defendant proved that the justice who tried the action was a justice of *Wayne*township in *Allen*county, in which township the action was commenced; and that the defendant, at the time of the service of process, and of the trial, was a resident and householder of *Washington*township in that county. Upon this proof, the Court dismissed the cause on the ground that the justice had no jurisdiction of it.

*P.*Sweetser, for the plaintiff.

*II.*Cooper, for the defendant.

It is contended that the judgment of the Circuit Court is justified by a statute respecting the jurisdiction of justices in *Allen*county. That statute provides, that a defendant in a civil action, resident in that county, shall be sued in the township in which he resides, if there be a justice therein who can legally try the cause. Laws of 1839, p. 90.

It may be questionable whether, under this statute, the defendant, in order to oust the jurisdiction of the justice of *Wayne*township, should not have carried the proof farther than he did, and have shown that a justice resided in *Washington*township. But we shall not stop to settle this point, as our decision will turn on another principle. It is enacted in the justice’s act, “ that after an appeal to the Circuit Court, no suit shall be dismissed because the same was commenced out of the proper township, unless objection shall have been made on the hearing of said cause before the justice.” R. S. 1838, p. 366. This provision embraces all cases in which the jurisdiction of the justice depends upon the township in which the action is commenced. As the defendant made no objection before the justice to his right to try the cause, it was too late to urge that matter in the Circuit Court. It was erroneous to dismiss the cause.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Executive
Chairman of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  August 14, 2008                           By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         257,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  617,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,938
<INVENTORY>                                  1,027,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,078,411
<PP&E>                                         506,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                 301,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,326,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,023,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,585,845
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,341,206)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,244,639
<SALES>                                      1,408,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,412,137
<CGS>                                        1,060,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,355,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT v. PHILIP LEONETTI.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 216 *N.J.Super.*579)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned officer of Asteriko Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, thatthe Company's Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

/s/Somporn Phatchan,

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

March 23rd, 2017
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mtniteb**~tate~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# fortbejfeberaI ([ireuit

INTELLECTWIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### v. HTC CORPORATION AND 

### HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
2012-1658 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District ofIllinois in case no. 09-CV-2945, Judge William T. Hart. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Intellect Wireless, Inc. moves to substitute Meredith Martin Addy as principal counsel. Paul K. Vickrey will remain as ofcounsel for Intellect Wireless, Inc. Upon consideration thereof, ITIs ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-1658 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2012INTELLECT WIRELESS, INC. V. HTC CORPORATION 2 The motion is granted. Meredith Martin Addy and Paul K. Vickrey should promptly file new entries of appearance. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s21 Case: 12-1658 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2012
# Sitemap

## March 11, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 03
- March 11, 2016

            - NASA Administrator Pays Tribute to Astronaut Scott Kelly
            - Astronaut Scott Kelly to Retire from NASA in April
            - Next Generation Scientists Participate in NASA-GLOBE Science Fair
            - NASA Tracking the Influence of Tides on Ice Shelves In Antarctica
            - Side View of Building 226 Showing the Connector between Portions
            - Senate NASA FY ’17 Appropriations Hearing
            - Sandstone Nodule Beside ‘Naukluft Plateau’ on Mount Sharp, Mars
            - Nodules of Cemented Sand Grains Within Martian Sandstone
            - New Waypoint, Science Team Newcomers for Curiosity
            - Knobbly Textured Sandstone on Mount Sharp, Mars
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD T. PRIORE.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY C. BROWN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
---

## Siegfried Kessler



---

Journal Contributor Siegfried Kessler  writes:

My first contact with Apollo was in July 1969.  I was 11 years old.  My father woke me up about midnight to watch the first step of Neil Armstrong in the TV.  I felt two things: I was proud to share this historical moment with millions of other people around the world, and I was happy to do it with my father.

After that, Apollo was my hobby.  I collected all the information, pictures and reports about it that I could find.   Mainly, I was very interested in the technique behind the Apollo Program. But it was quite difficult to get good information about it in Germany.   That is the reason why my hobby slept for a while.

Siegfried KesslerIn the meantime, I learned some things for my life : Toolmaker (1972), Designer (1981) and IT-specialist for CAD/CAM (1987).  The best thing I have ever done was to marry my wife Conny (1979) to start a family. The best gifts in my life are my three sons.

And then, the internet came up. You can not imagine what I felt when I have put the words "Apollo 11" in the search engine!  All the information I ever wanted, I found : Reports, drawings, press kits and sounds.  It will take a long time to read and (maybe) understand all this information.

One of the first sites I visited was the fantastic ALSJ by Eric M. Jones.  Shortly after my first contact with Eric, I had the opportunity to work on the ALSJ - creating Apollo 16 audio-files. This is a small step for the ALSJ, but it's a big step for me!

(Photo by Daniel Kessler.)
# KSC-99pp0851

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLA. -- At Launch Pad 39-B, the Chandra X-ray Observatory sits inside the payload bay on mission Space Shuttle Columbia, waiting for the doors to close. Chandra is the primary payload of STS-93, scheduled to launch aboard Columbia July 20 at 12:36 a.m. EDT. The combined Chandra/Inertial Upper Stage, seen here, measures 57 feet long and weighs 50,162 pounds. Fully deployed with solar arrays extended, the observatory measures 45.3 feet long and 64 feet wide. The world's most powerful X-ray telescope, Chandra will allow scientists from around the world to see previously invisible black holes and high-temperature gas clouds, giving the observatory the potential to rewrite the books on the structure and evolution of our universe

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-ksc-99pp0851/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 17, 1999ProducerKSCSize1744x2617pxPIA NumberKSC-99pp0851The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 04, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nabors Red Lion Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony G. Petrello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/    ANTHONY G. PETRELLO           |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony   G. Petrello                     |
|   | *President (Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | Date:   March 23, 2015               |

 

----
Order entered July 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01562-CR

No. 05-15-01563-CR

No. 05-15-01564-CR

No. 05-15-01565-CR

GENESIS HICKS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-39416-T, F15-39422-T, F15-39423 & F15-39424-T

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to issue the

mandates in these appeals INSTANTER.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 4.9(A)

     

    
      Addendum No. 2 to the Service Agreement, dated February 1, 2014

      Dated and Signed March 3, 2020

      

      

    

    	
            BETWEEN:

          	
            Ituran Location and Control, Ltd.

            Public Company No.  52-0043811

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            Of: 3 Hashikma Street, Azor

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            (hereinafter: "the Company")

          	
            Party of the First Part;

          
	
            AND:

          	
            Mr. Izzy Sheratzky

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            I.D. No. 007495443

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            Of: 14 Dulchin Street, Tel Aviv

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            (hereinafter: "Izzy")

          	
            Party of the Second Part;

          
	
            AND:

          	
            A. Sheratzky Holdings Ltd.

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            Private Company No. 51-3230268

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            Of: 14 Dulchin Street, Tel Aviv

          	
             

          
	
             

          	
            (hereinafter: "the Employer")

          	
            Party of the Third Part;

          


    
       

      

      

      WHREAS                  the Company and the Employer and Izzy have entered into an Agreement with independent Contractor dated February 1, 2014 (hereinafter: "the Agreement").

      

      

      AND WHEREAS      the parties wish to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional term of three years;

      

      

      THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DECLARED, AGREED AND STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

      

      

      According to Section 6.1 to the Agreement, the term of the Agreement shall be extended for additional three years, starting from February 1, 2020.

      

      

      AND IN WITNESS THEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE AFFIXED THEIR SIGNATURES:

      

      

      ___________            _______________

            IZZY                    THE COMPANY

      

      

      _______________

      THE EMPLOYER
# Sitemap

## February 26, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 02
- February 26, 2019

            - Vice President Hubert Humphrey Meets with Participants in the YOC and NYC Programs in May 1967
            - Expedition 59 crew members arrive at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan
            - Expedition 59 crew members arrive at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan
            - Expedition 59 backup crew members arrive at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan
            - Expedition 59 backup crew members arriving at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan
            - Expedition 59 crew members display crew insignia stickers
            - Expedition 59 crew members arrive at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan
            - Olivin Witchard
            - Virginia Baker
            - NASA Covers Large SLS Liquid Hydrogen Tank with Foam Insulation
# Sitemap

## April 18, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 04
- April 18, 2019

            - NASA Recognizes Apollo 10’s 50th Anniversary Through Long-Lasting Partnerships
            - NASA Celebrates Earth Day with Social Media, Public Events
            - Kennedy Scientist Leading Team to Combat Lunar Dust
            - Things Are Stacking up for NASA’s Mars 2020 Spacecraft
            - Flight Engineer Anne McClain practices Canadarm2 robotics maneuvers
            - Astronaut Nick Hague sets computer hardware
            - Astronaut Christina Koch practices Canadarm2 robotics maneuvers
            - Astronaut Anne McClain takes a portrait inside the cupola
            - Astronaut David Saint-Jacques takes a portrait inside the cupola
            - Astronauts Anne McClain and David Saint-Jacques practice Canadarm2 robotics maneuvers
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Gordon Link, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



Date:
November 13, 2003

|                                                              |  | /s/GORDON LINK |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | 
|Gordon Link
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 35.3

 

SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC.

2001 Edmund Halley Drive

Reston, VA 20191



Pursuant to Section 11.03 of the Amended and Restated Omnibus Subservicing Agreement dated February 8, 2016 among Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (“Subservicer”), Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly known as Navient Solutions, Inc.) as the master servicer and administrator (the “Servicing Agreement”), the undersigned certifies that (a) a review of the Subservicer’s activities during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligation under the Servicing Agreement, in all material respects, during such period.



N SERVICES, INC.



Chief Servicing Officer

 

March 2, 2018



GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.

2401 INTERNATIONAL LANE | MADISON, W1 53704-3192

PHONE: 608.246.1800 | WEB: MYGREATLAKES.ORG



---

---
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND J. SCHMIDT.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 414 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 414

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 28, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the Immigration and 
Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to assistance by States, and 
political subdivision of States, in the enforcement of Federal immigration laws, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 
(2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Lasselle *v.*Hewson.

*Tuesday, June*4.

A promissory note was declared on as made by the defendant, *Stanislaus Lasselle.*Plea, the general issue without oath. The note produced being signed *S.*Lasselle, was objected to as evidence on the ground of variance. *Held,*that the note, with evidence that the defendant usually signed his name *S. Lasselle,*was admissible.

ERROR to the *Carroll*Circuit Court. The cause was i submitted to the Circuit Court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favour of Hewson, the plaintiff.

Dewey, J.

Assumpsit. The declaration states that *Stanislaus Lasselle*“made his promissory note in writing on, &c., and then and there thereby promised,” &c. Plea, the general issue without oath. On the trial of the cause below, the plaintiff produced a note signed by *S.*Lasselle, and offered to prove by witnesses that the defendant, *Stanislaus Lasselle,*usually signed his name *S. Lasselle.*The note and explanatory testimony were objected to by the defendant, but admitted in evidence by the Court.

It is urged against the decision of the Circuit Court, that the note offered in evidence materially varied from the one described in the declaration in respect to the signature.

In the case of *Jones and another*v. *Mars and another,*2 Campb. *305,*which was assumpsit by indorsees against the drawers of a bill of exchange, the declaration stated “that the defendants made their certain bill of exchange, their own proper hands being thereto subscribed.” The bill, when produced, appeared to be drawn in the defendants’ firm of *Mars Co.*It was objected that the variance was fatal, but the Court overruled the objection, and refused to nonsuit the plaintiffs.

In the case of *Wardell and others*v. *Pinney,*1 Wend. 217, the declaration alleged that the defendant, by his promissory note, promised to pay “ to the order of the plaintiffs.” The note proved on the trial was payable “ to the order of *Wardell, Van Buren, & Co.”*The defendant objected to the note produced, on the ground of variance between it and the note described in the declaration. It was proved that the plaintiffs were partners doing business under the firm of *Wardell, Van**162Burén, *Sf Co.*The objection was overruled, the Court holding there was no variance. The Court in that case cited *Wood*v. *Bulkley,*13 Johns. 486, as a case in which a note averred to be made by *Christopher Bulkley,*was held to be proved by the production of a note signed *Christ.*BulJdey, it being shown that the defendant usually abbreviated his name in that manner.

*J. W. WrigJit,*for the plaintiff.

*H.*Chase, for the defendant.

These cases sustain the decision of the Circuit Court in the case before us. And as no injury can result from the principle which they establish, we feel disposed to adopt it.

The defendant may always obtain an inspection of .the note on which he is sued before he pleads, and if he does not recognize it as his own, the same defence remains open to him as if the manner of executing it should be alleged particularly in the declaration.

*Per Curiam.*

'The judgment is affirmed, with 3 *per cent.*damages and costs.