alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65502-65503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1941-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1941-DR), dated October 13, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 19, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of October 13, 2010.


[[Page 65503]]


    Brown, Carver, Le Sueur, Nicollet, Nobles, Redwood, Sibley, and 
Yellow Medicine Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-26845 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 22 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 209 

[Report No. 115–50] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 372) to restore the application 

of the Federal antitrust laws to the business of health insurance to 

protect competition and consumers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2017 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 372) to restore 

the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the business of health insurance to protect competition and consumers. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 372) to restore the application of the Federal antitrust 

4 laws to the business of health insurance to protect com5 petition and consumers. All points of order against considVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:52 Mar 20, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR209.RH HR209

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 209 RH 

1 eration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment 

2 in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Com3 mittee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, an amend4 ment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text 

5 of Rules Committee Print 115-8 shall be considered as 

6 adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

7 All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amend8 ed, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

9 as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 

10 amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening 

11 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

12 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

13 the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to 

14 recommit with or without instructions. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 22 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 209 

[Report No. 115–50] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 372) 

tect competition and consumers. laws to the business of health insurance to proto restore the application of the Federal antitrust 

MARCH 20, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. Dollars

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.00
<CASH>                                              729
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       544
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (266)
<INVENTORY>                                       1,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,676
<PP&E>                                            8,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (7,243)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6,312
<BONDS>                                           1,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             95
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,248
<SALES>                                              69
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     69
<CGS>                                               191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (416)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,944)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
#### Frank Putnam v. Martin V. Russell, Administrator, etc.

*Quitclaim deed*— Failure *of title*— Parol *evidence.*

A quitclaim deed conveys only the grantor’s interest,1 and the grantee cannot change its terms by proof of a contemporaneous verbal agreement by which the grantor was to refund a proportionate share of the purchase price in case of the failure of the title to ten acres of the land then in dispute, and which afterwards failed.

*390Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.)

Argued May 8 1891.

Decided July 3, 1891.

Appeal from decision of commissioners ’on claims. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Walter McBride,*for appellant.

*James M. Goodell,*for defendant.

1

See *Peters v. Cartier,*80 Mich. 124.

McGrath, J.

Henry J. Carlough conveyed to plaintiff, by quitclaim deed, 30 acres of land, the title to 10' acres of which failed.

Carlough died, and plaintiff presented a claim against his estate for $06, the proportion paid for this 10 acres. The proofs clearly showed that at the time of the conveyance it was well understood by both grantor and grantee that Oarlough's title to this 10 acres was in dispute, and it was agreed between the parties that if the title to this 10 acres should fail the amount paid therefor should be refunded to plaintiff. The circuit court, upon appeal thereto, admitted all the testimony, and afterwards, instructed a verdict for the defendant.

If such an arrangement as is set forth here existed,, the plaintiff should have insisted upon a warranty deed.. The quitclaim conveyed the grantor's interest only, and the plaintiff should not be permitted to introduce a contract resting in parol, varying the terms of the written instrument, and making it in effect a warranty deed.

A contract resting in parol, and inconsistent with the-written- instrument, cannot be said to be an independent contract within the authorities, and cannot be sustained.

The judgment below is affirmed,, with costs to defendant.

Chahplin, O. J., Morse and Long, J J., concurred. Grant, J., did not sit!
EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated July 8, 2009 on our review of the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of and for the three
month periods ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 is incorporated by reference in the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-72756. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
|Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.    
|Houston, Texas                      
|July 14, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1718]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 3 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; San Francisco, CA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) 
as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose 
zones;
    Whereas, the San Francisco Port Commission, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 3, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 39-
2010, filed 05/21/2010) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with 
a service area of the City and County of San Francisco and San Mateo 
County, California, within and adjacent to the San Francisco Customs 
and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 3's existing Site 1 would be 
deleted and Sites 2 through 4 would be categorized as usage-driven 
sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 29974, 05/28/10) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 3 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, and 
to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would 
terminate authority for Sites 2, 3 and 4 if no foreign-status 
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by October 31, 
2013.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26407 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

---

# Project Gemini



## Technology and Operations



# A Chronology

##### Published as NASA Special Publication-4002.

---

##### Prepared by

### James M. Grimwood and Barton C. Hacker

##### with

### Peter J. Vorzimmer

---



---

- Part I (A) April 1959 through December 1961
- Part I (B) January 1962 through December 1962
- Part II (A) January 1963 through December 1963
- Part II (B) January 1964 through December 1964
- Part III (A) January 1965 through December 1965
- Part III (B) January 1966 through February 1967
- Appendix 1: Gemini Program Flight Summary Data
Table A: GeneralTable B: Orbital OperationsTable C: Project Gemini ExperimentsTable D: Extravehicular Activity on Gemini Missions
- Table A: General
- Table B: Orbital Operations
- Table C: Project Gemini Experiments
- Table D: Extravehicular Activity on Gemini Missions
- Appendix 2: Gemini Program and Mission Objectives
- Appendix 3: Vehicle Manufacturing and Testing Histories
Table A: Gemini Launch VehicleTable B: Gemini Target VehicleTable C: Gemini Target Launch VehicleTable D: Gemini Spacecraft
- Table A: Gemini Launch Vehicle
- Table B: Gemini Target Vehicle
- Table C: Gemini Target Launch Vehicle
- Table D: Gemini Spacecraft
- Appendix 4: Worldwide Tracking Network
- Appendix 5: Cost of Gemini Program
- Appendix 6: NASA Centers and Other Government Agencies Participating in the Gemini Program
- Appendix 7: Contractors, Subcontractors, and Vendors ($100,000 and over)
- Appendix 8: U.S. Manned Space Flight Record, Summary of Mercury and Gemini Flights

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**Trico
      Marine Services, Inc.**


**Form
      10-Q**


**Quarterly
      Report**


**Quarterly
      Period Ended June 30, 2006**











**Certifications
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Trevor
      Turbidy, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the “Company”),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                August 8, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Trevor TurbidyTrevor
                TurbidyChief
                Executive Officer



















**Certifications
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Geoff
      Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the “Company”),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                August 8, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Geoff JonesGeoff
                JonesChief
                Financial Officer
# Sitemap

## October 19, 2007

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2007
- 10
- October 19, 2007

            - Challenges Met, More to Come
            - Cassini Significant Events 10/10/07 – 10/16/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 63497)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Genetic Determinants of Healthy Aging.                    

*Date:*                         November 10, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elaine Lewis, PhD, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707,                         *elainelewis@nia.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 8, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26076 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS RIKER, A/K/A THOMAS YOUMANS.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT

The HonorableRyan Guillen Chair, Committee on Culture, Recreation & Tourism Texas House ofRepresentatives Post Office Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768-2910

DearRepresentative Guillen: November 25,2013 OpinionNo. GA-l027 Re: Whether landowners may be liable for the actions oflaw enforcement officers that occur on the landowners' property or for livestock that escape due to actions over whichthe landowners have no control (RQ-1127-GA)

You ask whether existing law protects landowners, lessees and occupants ofagricultural land from liabilityin different circumstances. 1 Specifically, you ask about liability in the context ofhuman smuggling and lawenforcement actions surroundingthose activities. RequestLetter at 1. You also ask about liabilityfor the escape oflivestockdue to "external actions over which the [landowners, lessees, and occupants] have no control, such as trespassing, firefighting activities, game warden activities, poaching andvandalism." !d. at 1. The question ofliabilityinparticular circumstances involves issues for a court to determine and is thus outside the purview of an attorney general opinion. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0430 (2006) at 4 (declining to opine about potential liability "[b]ecause the merits ofany particular lawsuit would be determined by the specific facts involved and because this office does not resolve fact questions"). We can generally advise you that under a set offacts in which there is no fault attributable to an owner, lessee, or occupant of land, a court is unlikely to impose liability on the owner, lessee, or occupant. Cf Goode v. Bauer, 109 S.W.3d 788, 792 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. denied) ("liability for a violation ofthe stock laws has always required more than the presence of the defendant's animals in a forbidden place"). As a result, we are unable to answer your questions as amatter oflaw.

1 See Letter from Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, Comm. on Culture, Rec. & Tourism, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'yGen. at 1(May 17, 2013), http://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").The Honorable Ryan Guillen

- Page 2 (GA-1027)

SUMMARY
Whether any particular set ofcircumstances will result in liability is a fact question beyond the purview of an attorney general opinion.

DANIEL T. HODGE FirstAssistantAttorney General JAMES D. BLACKLOCK Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER Chair, OpinionCommittee CharlotteM. Harper Attorney General ofTexas

AssistantAttorney General, OpinionCommittee
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Alpine Air Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we, Eugene R. Mallette, CEO and Don T. Squire Jr., CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1)  The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:January 28 , 2009By:/s/ Eugene R. MalletteEugene R. MalletteCEODate:January 28 , 2009By:/s/Don T. Squire Jr.Don T. Squire Jr.CFO     1