alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDY LEE ROWE; SYLVIA MARIE
ROWE,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,

Respondent

- Appellee. No s

. 21

- 71308

21

- 71310

IRS No s

. 6432

- 20

7592

- 20

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted March 14, 2023 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sandy Lee Rowe and Sylvia Marie Rowe appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s

decision

, following a bench trial

, upholding the Commissioner of Internal

Revenue ’s determination of deficiencies for tax years 2017 and 2018. We have

jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7 482(a)(1). We review for clear error the Tax

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 20 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 71308

21

- 71310 Court ’ s determination that a taxpayer has not met his burden to substantiate a

deduction. Sparkman v. Comm ’ r , 509 F.3d 1149, 1159 (9th Cir. 2007). We

affirm.

The T ax C ourt did not clearly err in determining that the Rowes failed to

produce sufficient evidence to demonstrate their entitlement to claimed deductions

related to business expenses for tax year s 2017 and 2018

. See Norgaard v.

Comm ’ r , 939 F.2d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 19 91) (the taxpayer carries the burden of

establishing entitlement to a deduction) ; see also 26 U.S.C. § 162(a) (permitting

deduction of certain “ordinary and necessary” business expenses); id. § 274(d)

(setting forth substantiation requirements for claimed deductions for travel,

entertainment, and meal expenses )

. Contrary to the Rowes’ contention, the Tax

Court did not err by requiring them to justify their business expenses for tax year

2018, as they admitted they were seeking a deduction for business expenses rather

than their initial request for a qualified business income deduction.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 10, 2010
    /s/ Gary SawkaGary SawkaChief Financial Officer 35
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137099 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137099 

 COA: 285198 

Wayne CC: 80-000185-01-FH

RONNIE EARL MCDONALD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form  10-Q for the  period  ended  September  30,  2004 as  filed  with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger,  as
Executive Chairman of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant.



Date:  November 2, 2004                          By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Exhibit 31.3I, John A. Betts, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 15, 2005 /s/ John A. Betts         John A. Betts    Corporate Controller
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen A. Thorington, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Plains Exploration & Production Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PlainsExploration & Production Company; 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): 

 

a. allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
# STS-31 Discovery, Orbiter Vehicle (OV) 103, lands on EAFB concrete runway 22

STS031-S-135 (29 April 1990) --- The Space Shuttle Discovery makes a smooth landing on the runway at Edwards Air Force Base to complete a highly successful five-day mission. It was an Earth orbital flight during which the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) was sent toward its 15-year mission.  Landing was completed at 6:51 a.m. (PDT), April 29, 1990.  Inside the spacecraft for STS-31 were Astronauts Loren J. Shriver, Charles F. Bolden, Bruce McCandless II, Kathryn D. Sullivan and Steven A. Hawley.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s31-s-135/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 29, 1990ProducerJSCSize1917x1920pxPIA Numbers31-s-135The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 30, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 8, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00632-CV
MICHAEL FULLER, Appellant V. NIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11328



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellee’s July 20, 2018 motion to dismiss this appeal for want of
prosecution. The clerk’s record i s overdue. By letter dated J uly 9, 2018, the Court instructed
appellant to file, by July 19, 2018, either written verificatio n that he had paid or made arrangements
to pay the fee for the clerk’s record or written documentation that he has been found to be entitled
to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant th at failure to comply within the
time specified would result in dis missal of the a ppeal for want of prosecution. As of today’s date,
appellant has not responded to e ither this Court’s July 9 lette r or appellee’s motion to dismiss.
Accordingly, we grant appellee’ s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of–2– prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

180632F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

MICHAEL FULLER, Appellant

No. 05-18-00632-CV V.

NIS CONSTRUCTION , INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11328. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee NIS CONSTRUCTION, I NC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MICHAEL FULLER.

Judgment entered August 8, 2018.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01
 
  a)
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By
    
    /s/ Steve DubinSteve DubinChief Executive Officer
(logo) LNR

Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.         A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31, 2014 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period”), and of the Special Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 

By:          /s/ Job Warshaw

                Job Warshaw

                President

 

 

Dated: February 23, 2015

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

Schedule I

 

JPMBB 2014-C22

JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C22, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through

Certificates, Series 2014-C22

 

 

Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited

101 N. Wacker, Suite 100

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

Chicago IL 60606

General Contact

 

 

Fitch Rating

One State Street Plaza, 31st Floor

Attention: Commercial Mortgaged-Backed Securities Surveillance

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor

New York NY 10179

Bianca A. Russo

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,

383 Madison Avenue, 31st Floor

New York NY 10179

Kunal K. Singh

 

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance Group

New York NY 10007

General Contact

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

ATTN: JPMBB 2014-C22

Columbia MD 21045 1951

Corporate Trust (CMBS)

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Document Custody Department

1055 10th Avenue SE

MAC N9401-011

Minneapolis MN 55414

Kathleen A. Marshall

 

 

Wilmington Trust, National Association

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890

E Soriano
EX-10.43





 Exhibit 10.43 

Summary of Amendment to Severance for Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr. 

Pursuant to the terms of that certain Amended and Restated Key Employee Agreement dated February 1, 2007 by and between Organogenesis Inc. (the
“Company”) and Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr., as amended (the “Agreement”), in connection with a termination of Mr. Gillheeney’s employment by the Company other than for Cause (as defined therein) or
Mr. Gillheeney’s termination of his employment for Good Reason (as defined therein), the Company is obligated to provide Mr. Gillheeney with: (i) one half of his then current annual base salary, less applicable taxes, payable in
six (6) equal monthly installments, (ii) continuation of medical, dental and life insurance for six months following the date of termination and (iii) executive outplacement services with a mutually agreeable outplacement provider for
up to one (1) year. In August 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved a change to the terms of Mr. Gillheeney’s severance benefits upon the Company’s termination of his employment other than for Cause (as defined in
the Agreement) or Mr. Gillheeney’s termination of his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the Agreement) such that Mr. Gillheeney is entitled to: (i) his then current annual base salary, less applicable taxes, payable in
twelve (12) equal monthly installments, (ii) continuation of medical, dental and life insurance for one year following the date of termination and (iii) executive outplacement services with a mutually agreeable outplacement provider
for up to one (1) year.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS 

### _.PA. BQ^J^JS,JC^IT^.SJA^iptL, AUSJIN,TEXAS 78711 ©FF8CHAL BUSBMESS 

### STATE OFTEXAS , PENALTY FOR '' 

## 3/25/2015 FRiVATE USE \'\ SOWELS, LARRY GENE Tr. Ct. NotW89W04§SU (B)ledfrom ziiWR259/T'7'4-03 

### On this day, the application for 11 07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court. Abel Acosta, Clerk , ujS?

(Vjg APR06 2015

LARRY GENE SOWELS EASTHAM UNIT - TDC #527155 P. Q. BOX 16 LOVELADY, TX 75851 \v 

## 1>^

N3B 75B51 

# |qi.l,wl|M|i||,ll|li|ii,|1fjj,||i|1|1|a|j|h|i1|.n1|j|fi|ji i
Exhibit
10.36


 


FIRST
LEASE AMENDMENT


 


THIS
FIRST LEASE AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of September 26th, 2017
by and between SADDLE LANE REALTY, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company (the “Landlord”) and INTERPACE
DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Tenant”).


 


WITNESSTH:


 


WHEREAS,
the Landlord and the Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated March 31, 2017 (the “Lease”),
for 20,000 leasable square feet located on the third and fourth floors of the building known as 2515 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15222.


 


WHEREAS,
the parties seek to revise the Lease to: (i) extend the term of the Lease through and including June 30, 2018, and (ii) revise
the Tenant’s Option to Renew.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


 


1.
Extension of Lease. The Landlord and the Tenant hereby agree that the term of the Lease shall be extended to June
30, 2018. Monthly minimum rent shall remain $32,500.00 during the extended term.


 


2. Revised
Option to Renew. Section 3.D. of the Lease (styled: Option to Renew) shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:


 


D.
Option to Renew. Tenant shall have one (1) right and option to extend the term of this Lease for a period
of three (3) to five (5) years if Landlord receives written notice of exercise of such option (which notice must include the period
(not less than three (3) years nor more than five (5) years) in which this Lease is being extended, the “Renewal Notice”)
on or before December 15th, 2017. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. If Tenant timely delivers a Renewal Notice, all of the
terms and conditions of the Lease shall apply to the extended lease, including the amount of minimum rent as set forth in Section
3.A.


 


3.
Ratification of Lease. Except as modified by this Amendment, no other changes or modifications to the Lease are
intended or implied and the Lease is hereby specifically ratified, confirmed and continues to remain in full force and effect.


 


[Signature
Page to Follow]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


	WITNESS/ATTEST:	 	SADDLE LANE REALTY, LLC
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ David O. Brand
	 	 	 	David
    O. Brand, Sole Member
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	INTERPACE
DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/
    Jack E. Stover
	 	 	Name: 	Jack E. Stover
	 	 	Title:	President
    & CEO