alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-21-0000343

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN THE MATTER OF

MAUI KUPONO BUILDERS, LLC, Appellant-Appellee, v.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I;

DESIREE L. HIKIDA, Appellees-Appellees,

and GRACE PACIFIC, LLC, Appellee-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CCV-21-0000438)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Fujise, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal

With Prejudice of Appeal of All Claims and Parties, filed

August 11, 2021, by Appellee-Appellant Grace Pacific, LLC, the

papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal

has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the

appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and

costs; (3) the stipulation is signed by counsel for all parties

appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is

approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties

shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 27, 2021.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-21-0000343

27-AUG-2021

08:45 AM

Dkt. 43 OAWST
# Corps of Engineers modifying operations at recreation areas due to COVID-19

**ST. PAUL, Minn. –** The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District has closed all visitor centers, beaches and project offices to the public to protect against the further spread of COVID-19.

Most day use areas, boat ramps and trails will remain open and available. Contact the local office for availability.

Unopened Corps campgrounds within the St. Paul District will have an indefinite delay in their previously advertised seasonal openings. Individuals with paid camping reservations will be contacted by email and full refunds will automatically be processed by Recreation.gov with no cancellation fees. Individuals should not contact Recreation.gov to request a refund as that will lead to a cancellation fee being charged.

This closure also cancels Corps-sponsored events, interpretive programs, dam tours and site visits scheduled through May 11.

The St. Paul District regrets any inconvenience caused by these closures. The safety and health of our visitors and employees is our top priority.

For up-to-date information on modifications, closures or other restrictions related to St. Paul District areas visit: www.mvp.usace.army.mil.

– 30 – 

Release no. 20-029

COVID-19

recreation

campground

closure

St. Paul District

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
# STS-135 Atlantis Launch

Space shuttle Atlantis is seen through the window of a Shuttle Training Aircraft (STA) as it launches from launch pad 39A at Kennedy Space Center on the STS-135 mission, Friday, July 8, 2011 in Cape Canaveral, Fla.   Atlantis launched on the final flight of the shuttle program on a 12-day mission to the International Space Station.  The STS-135 crew will deliver the Raffaello multipurpose logistics module containing supplies and spare parts for the space station.  Photo Credit: (NASA/Dick Clark)

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-201107080003hq/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenJuly 8, 2011ProducerHQImage CreditNASA/Dick ClarkSize1389x1920pxPIA Number201107080003HQThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 19, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Dependency of: ) ) E. D.M. ) No.79788-3-1 D.O.B.05/28/2016, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Minor Child. )

) FILED:September 16,2019 

### PER CURIAM -The mother of E.D.M.appeals an order terminating her parental rights. She contends (a)the court violated her due process and statutory rights to a meaningful hearing by relying on unproven allegations in the termination petition,(b)the court misapplied the law in granting judgment on the pleadings under CR 43(f), (c)the court's findings do not support its conclusions

or permit meaningful review,and (d)the allegations in the termination petition are, in any event, insufficient to establish the termination criteria by clear,cogent, and convincing evidence. She asks this court to "reverse the order terminating her parental rights." Counsel for the Department of Children,Youth,and Families has filed a "Motion to Reverse and Remand for Further Proceedings." Counsel states that the mother is entitled to a new trial, that counsel emailed the mother's counsel regarding the Department's motion,and that "[o]n August 7,2019,appellate counsel. . . advised the [Department's counsel]that they were in agreement with the Department's motion."We grant the agreed motion and remand for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

FOR THE COURT: 

# &‘b,,,
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MALCOLM D. SCOTT.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT RELDAN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2013

NO. 03-11-00630-CV

Greg Abbott, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, having 

heard this cause on appeal and having considered the record of the court below, the briefs, and 

counsels’ argument, concludes that the district court’s judgment should be reversed and rendered 

in part, and affirmed in part.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that:

(1) The part of the district court’s judgment that requires the identities, job 

positions, and hire dates of the interviewees be redacted from the investigation 

report is reversed;

(2) The investigation report must be disclosed without redaction;

(3) The district court’s judgment is affirmed in all other respects; and

(4) Dallas Area Rapid Transit pay all costs related to this appeal; and

(5) This decision be certified below for observance.
(logo) CWCAPITAL

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

 

WFRBS 2014-C23  

 

                

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in Section 11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)          a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B)           to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President

 

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this Quarterly
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Downey Bridgwater,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                 |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater                       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | J. Downey Bridgwater                           
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00026

- CR

RHONDA JEAN FARMER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 42604

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Rhonda Jean Farmer was convicted by a Gregg County jury of theft of stolen property having a value greater than or equal to $1,500.00, but less than $20,000.00. After the jury returned its guilty verdict, Farmer and the State entered into a post

- convictio n negotiated plea agreement recommending a sentence of two years’ incarceration in a state jail facility, suspended for a term of four years’ community supervision. The trial court accepted the post

- conviction negotiated plea agreement and sentenced Farme r in accordance with the terms of that agreement. As a part of her agreement with the State, Farmer waived, among other things, her right to file an appeal. Notwithstanding that waiver, Farmer filed a notice of appeal. On our review of the clerk’s record , we noted that the trial court certifi ed that Farmer had waived her right of appeal. By letter dated May 16, 2014, we informed Farmer of this potential jurisdictional defect and afforded her ten days in which to respond. We received no response from Far mer to our May 16 correspondence. Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states that an “appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). B ecause the trial court ’s certification indicates that Farmer waived her right of appeal and because the record before us contains nothing to suggest that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Te x. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss th is appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d).3 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2014 Date Decided: June 5, 2014 Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on
Form  10-Q for the  period  ended  September  30,  2009 as  filed  with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger,  as
Principal  Financial Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted by ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to my
knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  November 16, 2009                      By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                     Arthur I. Trueger
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T , does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofCarey Credit Income Fund 2016 T.

Date:April 17, 2017/s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMARK J. DECESARISChief Executive OfficerDate:April 17, 2017/s/ Paul S. Saint-PierrePAUL S. SAINT-PIERREChief Financial Officer


The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T or the certifying officers.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T and will be retained by Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### DANIEL JANSEN v. FOOD CIRCUS SUPERMARKETS, INC.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*51)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

PRISON LEGAL NEWS,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED

STATES ATTORNEYS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-1531

(D.C. No. 1:08-CV-01055-MSK-KLM) 

ORDER

This appeal is before the court based on an “unopposed motion to dismiss” filed by

Appellant-Defendant Executive Office for United States Attorneys in Appeal No. 09-1531.

The court construes the “unopposed motion” as a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) to

voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 09-1531. 

Upon consideration, the motion to voluntarily dismiss is GRANTED. Appeal No. 09-

1531 is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

The entry of this order does not affect Appeal No. 09-1511.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1531 Document: 01018413791 Date Filed: 05/03/2010 Page: 1
Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20419

Contact: Matthew Shannon FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(202) 653-6772, ext. 1172 September 15, 2010

V/TDD 1-800-877-8339

(Federal Relay Service)

U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD (MSPB) TO

CONDUCT FIRST ORAL ARGUMENT IN 27 YEARS

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, the MSPB will hear oral argument in the matters of 

Rhonda K. Conyers v. Department of Defense, MSPB Docket No. CH–0752–09–0925–I–1, and 

Devon H. Northover v. Department of Defense, MSPB Docket No. AT–0752–10–0184–I–1. The 

proceedings will take place at 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit, Room 201, 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. See 75 FR 56146, Sept. 15, 

2010.

Conyers and Northover raise the question of whether, pursuant to 5 CFR part 732, the 

rule in Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530–31 (1988), limiting the scope of 

MSPB review of an adverse action based on the revocation of a security clearance, also applies 

to an adverse action involving an employee in a ‘‘non-critical sensitive’’ position due to the 

employee having been denied continued eligibility for employment in a sensitive position. The 

Board requested and received an advisory opinion from the Office of Personnel Management 

(OPM) in this matter. See 5 U.S.C. § 1204(e)(1)(A). The Board also invited and received 

amicus curiae briefs. See 75 FR 6728, Feb. 10, 2010.

The parties and the amici curiae will be allotted time at the hearing to present oral 

argument in this matter. The briefs submitted by the parties and the amici curiae, as well as 

OPM’s advisory opinion, are available for viewing on the MSPB’s website at 

http://www.mspb.gov/oralarguments. The MSPB also will make a recording of the oral 

argument available on its website. The public is welcome to attend this hearing for the sole 

purpose of observation. Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features, such as sign language interpretation, must inform MSPB of those needs 

in advance.
This is the first time the MSPB has conducted an oral argument in 27 years. Chairman 

Susan Tsui Grundmann, Vice Chairman Anne Wagner, and Member Mary Rose will utilize oral 

argument in cases like Conyers and Northover that present issues of special significance 

because of their broad potential impact on the Federal civil service and merit systems. 

Chairman Grundmann stated, “In an era of unprecedented Government transparency and 

openness, it is incumbent upon the Board to exercise its existing abilities to request amicus 

briefs and conduct oral argument in order to shed light on the issues, the debate, and the 

process. Doing so should result in the best decisions for Federal employees and agencies, and 

the American people.”

The U.S. Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) is an independent, quasi-judicial agency that protects Federal merit 

systems and the rights of individuals within those systems. The MSPB also conducts studies of the civil service and 

other merit systems in the Executive Branch.
EXHIBIT 31


                                                  CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jehu Hand, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Maritime Ventures,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 1, 2004

/s/ Jehu Hand
Learned Jeremiah Hand
CEO and Chief Financial Officer
President
#### JOYCE WILLIAMS v. COMMUNITY REALTY MANAGEMENT, ET AL.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*517)
No. 87-1039.

#### Juarbe Angueira *v.*Arias, Director of the Public Building Authority.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.