alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****
**National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA History Office **

----

****

----

**The Apollo 16 Flight JournalDavid Woods and Tim Brandt**

----

*Apollo 16 Flight Journal*
Apollo Flight Journal

Like its companion, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, it is intended to be a resource for all those interested in the Apollo program, whether in a passing or scholarly capacity.

This journal covers the flight of Apollo 16, eventually from launch to splashdown. As a living document, it will continue to grow and evolve and major changes will be intimated in the appropriate internet groups.

Journals for other Apollo flights are available at the AFJ Portal.

----

- Mission Summary 

#### Travelling from the Earth to the Moon

- Day 1: Launch and Ascent to Earth Orbit
- Day 1: First Earth Orbit
- Day 1: Second Earth Orbit and Trans-Lunar Injection
- Day 1: Transposition, Docking and Extraction
- Day 1: Translunar Cruise
- Day 2: Electrophoresis Experiment and Midcourse Correction Burn
- Day 2: LM Entry and Checks
- Day 3: ALFMED Experiment
- Day 3: Lunar Module Activation and Checkout
- Day 4: Arrival at the Moon

#### In Lunar Orbit

- Day 4: Lunar Orbit Insertion
- Day 4: Descent Orbit Insertion, Revs 3 to 9
- Day 5: Transfer to Lunar Module, Revs 10 and 11
- Day 5: Lunar Module Undocking and Preparation, Revs 11 and 12
- Day 5: "I be a sorry bird". LM and CM Problems, Rev 12 and 13
- Day 5: Rendezvous and Waiting. Revs 13 to 15
- Day 5: LM Powered Descent Initiation Clearance and Landing, Revs 15 to 16
- Day 5: Lunar Observation and Rest, Revs 16 to 21
- Day 6: Lunar Observation, Revs 21 to 27
- Day 6: Lunar Observation, Revs 27 to 34
- Day 7: Lunar Observation, Revs 35 to 45
- Day 8 Part 1: Lunar Observation, Revs 46 to 51
- Day 8 Part 2: LM Liftoff and Rendezvous, Revs 52 to 58
- Day 9 Part 1: Preparation for LM Jettison, Revs 59 to 62
- Day 9 Part 2: LM Jettison and Trans-Earth Injection

#### Returning To Earth

- Day 10 Part 1: Preparation for EVA
- Day 10 Part 2: EVA and Housekeeping
- Day 11 Part 1: Geology, Experiments and Guidance Fault Investigation
- Day 11 Part 2: Press Conference, Experiments and House-Keeping
- Day 12: Entry and Splashdown

----

#### Reference Material

- Operational Procedures
- CSM Launch Checklist
- CSM Guidance and Control Checklist  
- Apollo 16 Lunar Surface Journal
- Image Library
- Photo Index
- Mission Report
- Preliminary Science Report
- Technical Debrief
- Press Kit
- Flight Plan
- As-Flown CM/LM Stowage
- Bill Wood - Apollo TV Essay
- TV and Communications Documentation
- Post-Flight EMU Examination

#### Other

- Notes on Transcription

AFJ Portal

----

updates file.

----

The United States Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of the Apollo Flight Journal, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

##### These files are copyright © 2003-2009 W. David Woods and Tim Brandt.

----
# Welcome Home Apollo 8

Although it was past 2 a.m. on Dec. 29, 1968, more than 2,000 people were on hand at Ellington Air Force Base to welcome the members of the Apollo 8 crew back home. Astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell and William Anders had just flown to Houston from the Pacific recovery area near Hawaii.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/welcome-home-apollo-8/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareSize1041x689pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 17, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
H. Res. 123 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 15, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 43) providing for congressional disapproval under 

chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule submitted by Secretary of Health and Human Services relating 

to compliance with title X requirements by project recipients 

in selecting subrecipients. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on 

any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader 

or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

69) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 
2 

•HRES 123 EH 

of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to ‘‘Non-Subsistence Take of 

Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on 

National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska’’. All points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The 

joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; 

and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 3. On any legislative day during the period from 

February 17, 2017, through February 24, 2017— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 4. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period ad-
3 

•HRES 123 EH 

dressed by section 3 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ZARCO HOTELS INCORPORATED, Appellant

v.

HOLLYWOOD CASINOS, LLC, Appellee

______________________

2019

- 2401

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

91203686.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K

AMRAN F ATTAHI

, Law Offices of Kamran Fattahi, Sherman Oaks, CA, argued for appellant.

H ARA K. J ACOBS

, Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellee.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 19-2401 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 11/09/2021P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY

, B RYSON

, and H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 9 , 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 19-2401 Document: 63 Page: 2 Filed: 11/09/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6485

BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden of the Coffeewood Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00359-jct) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bernard Ray Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00065
- CV
William Joseph Connors III, Appellant

v. Connie Vandergriff, The Appointed Substitute Trustee for Citimortgage, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, N O. D
- 1
- GN
- 17
- 005968, THE HONORABLE TIM S ULAK, JUDGE PRESIDIN G

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM Appellee Connie Vandergriff, the Appointed Substitute Trustee for Citimortgage, Inc., has notified this Court that a ppe llant William Joseph Connors III has filed for bankruptcy protection (United States Bankruptcy Court, W .D. Texas, Case No. 19

- 10725 D ). See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. Accordingly, this appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy
court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a). It is the parties’ responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs that would allow reinstatement. Id. Fai lure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in the dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b).2 Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith Bankruptcy Filed: July 3, 2019
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the report of Spectre Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, D. Bradly Olah, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and I Kevin M. Greer, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
      D.
      Bradly Olah





D.
      Bradly
      Olah


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      30,
      2007




/s/
      Kevin
      M. Greer





Kevin
      M.
      Greer


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      30,
      2007
No. 87-1504.

#### Loengard et al. *v.*Santa Fe Industries, Inc., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George Ecker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OCTuS, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2010  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS Inc.





Date: August 23, 2010


/s/ George EckerGeorge Ecker

Chief Financial Officer
- Home
- Controlled Unclassified...

- OCIO   - OCIO Home
  - About the OCIO
  - IT Talk
  - NASA IT Strategic Plan
  - NASA Records Management
  - Accessibility at NASA
- Strategy Division
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Division   - CSPD Home
  - Privacy Program
  - Cybersecurity Policies
  - Supply Chain Risk Management
  - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
- Operations Division

# Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) And Why It Matters!

As we all do our daily jobs in an ever-changing work environment, it’s important to safeguard NASA’s information.

Established by Executive Order 13556 [PDF], and implemented by 32 CFR part 2002, the CUI Program is now being implemented across NASA and all Executive Branch agencies and departments. The goal of the new CUI program is to standardize how sensitive information is marked, handled and shared, while ensuring the information remains appropriately protected.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and government-wide policies but is not classified under Executive Order 13526 or the Atomic Energy Act, as amended.
      - June 30, 2020, NASA initiated a  Controlled Unclassified Information  Awareness Campaign. During this CUI Awareness Campaign individuals became familiar with the following:
      - CUI Implementation Timeline 
      - NASA’s issuance of an Internal Marking Waiver that permitted SBU and CUI to coexist until October 1, 2021 for NASA. 
      - NASA CUI Waivers         - CUI / SBU Coexistance Waiver G1 Signed
        - Legacy Material Marking Waiver G1 Signed 
      - Initial CUI Training deployed
      - October 1, 2021, NASA fully incorporated the CUI nomenclature for information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and government-wide policies
      - NPR 2810.7 Controlled Unclassified Information released

***Note: Legacy SBU information will not be remarked unless it is reused or disseminated with another Agency***

If you have questions about CUI at NASA contact:

Stayce Hoult, Privacy & Michael Guerin, CUI Program Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,350
<SECURITIES>                                        40
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,107
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,027
<PP&E>                                          59,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,033
<BONDS>                                            253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,420
<SALES>                                         57,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,023
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.85)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 95-5695

WANDA BREEDEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.

Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge.

(CR-94-30135)

Submitted: August 22, 1996

Decided: September 12, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Elgine H. McArdle, PHILLIPS, GARDILL, KAISER & ALTMEYER, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. William D. Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United

States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Breeden pled guilty to aiding and abetting the distribution

of crack cocaine within 1000 feet of a school, 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988),

21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841, 860 (West 1981 & Supp. 1996). She appeals her

sentence, alleging that the district court erred in failing to make findings concerning a downward departure based on letters she submitted

to the court two months after she was sentenced. We affirm.

Breeden did not request a downward departure at her sentencing

hearing in August 1995. The district court sentenced her to 37 months

imprisonment, the lowest point of her guideline range. In October

1995, Breeden wrote to the district court requesting a sentence of

home confinement because of the hardship her imprisonment was

causing her two teenage sons. Breeden's former employer also wrote

the court that he would be happy to hire her again if she were on

home detention. The court subsequently granted Breeden's motion to

supplement the record on appeal with the two letters.

Breeden now contends that the district court erred in failing to

make additional findings concerning the effect of the letters on the

sentence previously imposed. We disagree. By not requesting a departure at the sentencing hearing, Breeden forfeited the issue. Most

important, because the original sentence was not in error, once the

district court unequivocally stated the sentence and imposed it, the

court lacked authority to change it. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c); United

States v. Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 7 (4th Cir. 1993).

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
# STS-46 MS Chang-Diaz floats in life raft during water egress training at JSC

S92-33478 (12 March 1992) --- Astronaut Franklin R. Chang-Diaz, mission specialist, relies on a one-person life raft to get him to "safety" during a STS-46 bailout simulation exercise.  The training took place in the Johnson Space Center's weightless environment training facility.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s92-33478/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 10, 1992ProducerJSCSize1920x1257pxPIA Numbers92-33478The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
---

## Lennie Waugh



---

Journal Contributor Lennie Waugh writes:

I was born in 1954 in Edinburgh, Scotland and am married to Jacquie.  We have a son Matthew.

I first became interested in Apollo in Dec 68, during the Christmas time Apollo 8 mission.  From then on, I watched as much as the BBC transmitted.In 1998, when my employer British Telecom gave us access to the Internet, I found the Journals and have been given access to a incredible amount of information which I thought was going to remain a memory and not something I was going to spend most of my spare time on...when I win the on going battle for computer access in my house. We also like to spend time cycling when the weather is good enough.

Editors Note: The photo below shows Lennie Waugh (second from the left), with David Harland (left), Ian Roberts (second right), and David Woods (right) at Glasgow Base (aka the Woods residence) on 11 May 2002.Harland, Waugh, Roberts, Woods