alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Astronaut Bob Hines poses inside BEAM

iss067e123265 (June 10, 2022) --- Expedition 67 Flight Engineer and NASA astronaut Bob Hines poses inside the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) packed with cargo and attached to the International Space Station's Tranquility module.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/gmt163_10_39_1092_beam-ingress-photos-4/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
TakenJune 10, 2022Image CreditNASASize5568x3712pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Dec 27, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
# STS-30 Atlantis, OV-104, nears KSC LC Pad 39B atop the crawler transporter

S89-30719 (22 March 1989) --- Space shuttle Atlantis is seen soon in duplicate, thanks to reflection in nearby water, after arriving at Pad 39-B.  The spacecraft left the vehicle assembly building (VAB) at 12:01A.M. and arrived to this point at 7 A.M.  Atlantis is scheduled for NASA STS-30 mission on which the Magellan will be deployed to orbit planet Venus and map its topographic features.  Launch is scheduled for April 28.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-s89-30719/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 11, 1989ProducerJSCSize1881x1920pxPIA Numbers89-30719The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892038
<NAME>                        TELEPAD CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          1,499,135
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,093,686
<ALLOWANCES>                      126,000
<INVENTORY>                     2,252,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                7,707,679
<PP&E>                          1,157,104
<DEPRECIATION>                   (702,314)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,386,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,668,834
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          117,556
<OTHER-SE>                      6,717,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,386,058
<SALES>                         2,662,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,786,043
<CGS>                           2,575,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,651,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,201,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (3,775,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,775,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERIC TOULSON.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - 17 CFR Parts 229, 240, and 249
          - [Release Nos. 33-9148A; 34-63029A; File No. S7-24-10]
          - RIN 3235-AK75

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 13, 2010, concerning Disclosure for Asset-Backed Securities Required by Section 943 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The document contained an incorrect reference to § 249.1300. This correction is being published to correct the reference.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rolaine Bancroft, Attorney-Advisor, in the Office of Rulemaking, at (202) 551-3430, Division of Corporation Finance, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-3628 or, with respect to proposed Rule 17g-7, Joseph I. Levinson, Special Counsel, at (202) 551-5598; Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-3628.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 13, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-25361, the reference “249.1300” is corrected to read “249.1400” in the following places:                    

On page 62719, in footnote 7 in the first column, two lines from the bottom;

On page 62735, in the first column, two lines from the top;

On page 62736, in the first column, thirty-one lines from the top;

On page 62736, in the first column, eight lines from the bottom;

On page 62736, in the first column, three lines from the bottom;

On page 62736, in the second column, two lines from the top; and

On page 62736, in the second column, six lines from the top.

Dated: October 19, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-26810 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-10668; LLAK-962000-L14100000-HY0000-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
the Bureau of Land Management will issue an appealable decision to 
Bristol Bay Native Corporation. The decision will approve the 
conveyance of the surface and subsurface estates for certain lands 
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. The lands are 
located southwesterly of Manokotak, Alaska, aggregating 31.96 acres. 
Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Anchorage Daily News.

DATES: Any party claiming a property interest in the lands affected by 
the decision may appeal the decision within the following time limits:
    1. Unknown parties, parties unable to be located after reasonable 
efforts have been expended to locate, parties who fail or refuse to 
sign their return receipt, and parties who receive a copy of the 
decision by regular mail which is not certified, return receipt 
requested, shall have until November 26, 2010 to file an appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0362682d616f6e2d606c6d75667a626d60664362682d616f6e2d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0a0045090706450804051d0e120a05080e2b0a0045090706450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may contact the Bureau of Land 
Management by calling the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Dina L. Torres,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Branch of Preparation and 
Resolution.
[FR Doc. 2010-27048 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH J. SMITH.

November 21, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certifies with respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report) that to his knowledge:



|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2004

/s/ Henry R. Mandell

Henry R. Mandell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Hern *v.*Allison.

In debt on a judgment for 67 dollars and 71 cents damages and seven dollars and 55 cents costs, a transcript of a judgment for 67 dollars and 71 cents damages and also costs, is inadmissible as evidence on the ground of variance.

*Monday, June 8.*

ERROR to the *Jefferson*Circuit Court.

*M. C. Bright,*for the plaintiff.

*S. C. Stevens,*for the defendant.

Blackford, *J.*

Allison sued *Hern*in debt for 75 dollars and 26 cents. The action is founded on the judgment of a Circuit Court in *Kentucky.*Pleas, *nul tid record*and *nil debet.*Issues on the pleas; and the cause submitted to the Court.

The declaration states that the judgment is for 67 dollars and 71 cents damages, *and seven dollars and*55 *cents costs;*that an authenticated copy of the judgment is brought into Court; and that by means thereof an action has accrued to the plaintiff, to have and demand of the defendant *the said sum of*75 *dollars and*26 *cents;*yet, &c.

The judgment, as shown by the transcript offered in evidence by the plaintiff, is for 67 dollars and 71 cents damages, *and also costs.*But the amount of the costs recovered is not shown by the transcript.

The defendant objected to the transcript as evidence, but the objection was overruled. Judgment for the plaintiff for 75 dollars and 26 cents, the debt, &c.

The transcript not showing the amount of the costs recovered, varies materially from the judgment described in the declaration. The objection to the transcript as evidence was, therefore, well founded.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### Comparet *v.*Jernegan and Another.

The written laws of the other states of the Union, cannot be .proved here byparol evidence.

But the printed statute-books of the other states, purporting to be published by authority, are *prima facie*evidence here of the statutes they contain.

Tuesday, *November*24.

ERROR to the *Allen*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

This was an action of debt on a promissory note, made and executed in the city of *New-*York, and payable at the same place. The plaintiffs in their declaration *376claim the legal rate of interest in the state of *New-York,*_ which they aver to be seven *per cent, per annum,.*The defendant pleaded *nil debet.*On the trial, the plaintiffs introduced a witness to prove by parol that, by the laws of the state of *New-*York, the legal rate of interest was as they had averred and claimed in their declaration. The defendant objected to the testimony, but it was admitted by the Court, to which the defendant excepted. Judgment was given against the defendant for the debt, and damages at the rate of seven *per cent, per annum.*

*jD. H. Colerick*and *W. H. Coombs,*for the plaintiff.

*H. Cooper,*for the defendants.

The testimony objected to by the defendant should have been rejected by the Court. It has been repeatedly decided, both in the - *United, States*and in *England,*that the written laws of a foreign state cannot be proved by parol, if the laws themselves can be produced. To allow such proof would be to violate the.familiar rule, which requires the best evidence to be adduced that the case 'admits of. *Consequa*v. *Willings,*1 Pet. C. C. R. *229.*—Craig v. *Brown,*Id. 352.—*Packard*v. *Hill,*2 Wend. *411.*—Kenny v. *Clarkson,*1 Johns. R. 385.—3 Pick. *293.*—Clegg v. *Levy,*3 Camp. 166.—*Hulle*v. *Heightman,*4 Esp. R. 75.

By virtue of the act of *Feb.*17, 1838, (Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 272,) the printed statute-books of any of the states of the Union, purporting to be published by authority, are made *prima facie*evidence, in the courts of this state, of the laws published in them. Were it not for that statute, even the printed ’ statute-book of a sister state would be incompetent to pr.ove" *the*laws of such state, much less, it is manifest, would parol testimony be sufficient for that purpose.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issue set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
# Sitemap

#

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

## B

                - Best Practices Presentations
                - Best Practices to Avoid Explosives and Blasting Accidents
                - Bituminous Coal Operator's Association and the National Mining Association
                - Brookwood Mine Disaster
                - Brookwood-Sago Mine Safety Grants
                - Buffalo Creek Mine Disaster 50th Anniversary
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27012]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 10, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. J. Grant Burcham, as trustee of the James Grant Burcham Trust, 
Kansas City, Missouri; to retain control of MBT Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly retain control of Missouri Bank and Trust Company, 
both of Kansas City, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Byron Cook; Ginne Sue Cook; Katie Cook; Lance Cook; Karen Cook, 
and Nina Sue Cook, all in Corsicana, Texas, collectively the Cook 
Family; to retain voting shares of Community Bank Holdings of Texas, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Community National 
Bank and Trust of Texas, both of Corsicana, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 21, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-27012 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
#### Wyle et al., Appellees, *v.*Weber, Appellant.

(No. 895

Decided February 5, 1945.)

*Messrs. Williams, Fitton & Pierce,*for appellees.

*Mr. John D. Anclreios,*for appellant.

By the Court.

We are of the opinion that the trial court placed the proper construction -upon the terms of the writing evidencing the agreement of the parties to this leasehold. It provided for notice in order to terminate the lease at the end of a year, but did not require this notice to be given other than before expiration of the year. Therefore, the notice given any time before expiration of the year complied with the agreement.

In absence of agreement, the lessee was not entitled to notice. The lease was for a fixed term. In 24 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1253, Section 495, it is said:

> “However, where the demise is for a fixed term, and is to end on a day certain, or upon the happening of some particular event, it is the generally accepted rule that no notice to quit is prerequisite to the bringing of ejectment. Moreover, a notice to quit other than the mere filing of the petition is not a necessary prerequisite to an action of ejectment by a landlord against a tenant holding under a periodical tenancy, or under a tenancy from year to year arising from the tenant’s holding over after his term. In the latter case, if the landlord does not choose to accept the proferred tenancy for another year, he is at liberty to treat the oc*164cup ant as a trespasser, and may maintain ejectment against Mm without previous notice of Ms intention not to prolong the tenancy.”

The appeal is reduced to an appeal on law, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Ross, P. J., Hildbbrant and Matthews, JJ., concur.
#### IN THE MATTER OF MARY PAGAN.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Josie Ben Rubi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to OCTuS, Inc., and will be retained by OCTuS, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Josie Ben Rubi
--------------------------
Josie Ben Rubi
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2005