alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALANDIS D. PATTERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:16-cr-00299-BHH-2; 6:19-cv-03256-

BHH)

Submitted: May 23, 2023 Decided: May 26, 2023

Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alandis D. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7418 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alandis D. Patterson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Patterson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7418 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### HENRYLK CEGIELNIK v. JOSE A. SOTO.

December 16, 1986.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
# STS-126 Preflight Training IN/EG, Bldg. 9NW FFT

STS-126 Preflight Training IN/EG, Bldg 9NW FFT

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-jsc2008e119073/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenSeptember 30, 2008ProducerJSCImage CreditJAMES BLAIRSize1920x1536pxPIA Numberjsc2008e119073The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 13, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
Document




Exhibit 10.5(d)



April 8, 2020
Randal A. White
[                             ]                  
Tampa, Florida 33609


Dear Randy,
In light of the circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our business, Masonite International Corporation (the “Company”) is requesting that you agree to reduce your annualized base salary rate from $415,000.00 to $332,000.00 for the time period of April 13, 2020 through June 26, 2020 (the “Reduction Period).  By signing below, you hereby agree and consent to the reduction and agree that the reduction does not constitute “good reason” or a “constructive termination” (or term of similar meaning) under any agreement to which you are a party or any plan in which you participate, including but not limited to the Employment Agreement by and between you and the Company and any equity awards.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in accordance with the Company’s Management Incentive Plan, your annual MIP bonus for fiscal year 2020 will be calculated using your base salary in effect at the end of 2020.  Additionally, any severance to which you may become entitled during the Reduction Period will be calculated using your base salary in effect immediately prior to any reduction hereunder.  Please note that to the extent that any of your benefits are based on your annual base salary level, your benefits may be impacted by your base salary reduction.  The reduction in base salary described above may affect the aggregate amount of your contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan for 2020.  You should consider whether to make any changes to your contribution elections.
Thank you for your continued efforts during these difficult and uncertain times.  
            Sincerely,
            Masonite International Corporation




            By:         /s/ Howard C. Heckes       
            Title: Howard C. Heckes
             President & CEO
Acknowledged and agreed:




/s/ Randal A. White            
Name: Randal A. White 
Date: April 8, 2020




masonite.com
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Downey Bridgwater, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2003                    /s/ J. DOWNEY BRIDGWATER
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       J. Downey Bridgwater
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 28, 2015

NO. 03-14-00666-CR

Nicholas S. Morphis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Nicholas S. 

Morphis has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows 

Nicholas S. Morphis to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               285,450
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     380,268
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    13,735,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                259,656
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                               70
<COMMON>                                               1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                         9,874,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      13,735,316
<SALES>                                              865,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     865,600
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        701,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    82,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       85,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                          87,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,389)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.01)


</TABLE>
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.as Depositor 

600 Washington Blvd.

Stamford, CT 06901

 

RE:         Annual Statement as to Compliance 

WFRBS 2014 C23

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Poolingand Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C23, as an authorized officer ofNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB MasterServicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activitiesof the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled allobligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2017.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance 

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Marlene Jean Orosco v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00328

- CR

Trial court case number: 1595760

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

This Court has become aware that the trial court signed an order on June 6, 2020,

terminating appellant’s deferred adjudication community supervision and discharging appellant.

The Harris County District Clerk shall file a supplemental cle rk’s record within 10 days

of the date of this order including the trial court’s June 6, 2020 order granting appellant early

release from deferred adjudica t ion community supervision

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

______ /s/ Peter Kelly

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ May 25, 2021

_____
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HERMAN ASHLEY.

January 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-1790

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

    OSIRIS NATERA-SOSA, a/k/a SEALED DEFENDANT 4, a/k/a NIKE,

                      Defendant, Appellant.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

        [Hon. Jes£s A. Castellanos, U.S. Magistrate Judge]



                              Before

                      Lynch, Circuit Judge,
                 Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                


     Alexander Zeno on brief for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Nelson Perez-Sosa,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Michelle Morales, Assistant
United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.





March 11, 1999



                                        
     

     Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and record, we
perceive no clear error in the enhancement of defendant's sentence
under U.S.S.G. � 3B1.1(c).  The information available to the
district court, including among other things the pre-sentence
report and the suppression hearing, adequately supported the
finding that defendant was a supervisor and organizer in the
conspiracy.  We will not set aside the district court's fact-
specific decision.  See United States v. Cruz, 120 F.3d 1, 3 (1st
Cir. 1997).
     Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```
No. 21.

#### The Mayor & Council of Rome, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*David D. Duke, defendant in error.

[1 ] Before a judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, the burden is upon the party complaining to show, affirmatively, that it was erroneous.

Mandamus. Decision by Judge Trippe, at Chambers, •June 2b, 1855.

David D. Duke applied for a mandamus, to compel the 'City Council of Rome to grant him a license to retail spirituous liquors. In his petition, he alleged that he had complied with the city ordinances, in every respect, and that they refused to grant him a license.

The City Council responded that the applicant had not complied with the ordinances; and if he had, they insisted that they had full discretion to grant or refuse a license to any one they may see proper; and that the applicant was unworthy to have such a license.

The Court granted a *mandamus*absolute, and this decision is assigned as error.

Underwood, represented by Hull, for plaintiffs in error.

Wright and Printup, for defendant in error.

*By the Court.*

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] We are called upon to reverse a judgment made upon an Ordinance of the City of Rome, without having the ordinance before us. YYe cannot assume that responsibility. The council may be clothed with discretionary power to grant or withhold a license. If so, the fact should have been made to appear. Upon one point we are clear, namely: That an ordinance, like a statute, should operate uniformly. And *94that the council had no right to make the applicant’s case an exception. Unless the authority to discriminate is conferred by the charter, all who bring themselves within the provisions of the ordinance, are entitled to its privileges.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-5695 WANDA BREEDEN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-30135) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 12, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELElgine H. McArdle, PHILLIPS, GARDILL, KAISER & ALTMEYER, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. William D. Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Wanda Breeden pled guilty to aiding and abetting the distribution of crack cocaine within 1000 feet of a school, 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988), 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841, 860 (West 1981 & Supp. 1996). She appeals hersentence, alleging that the district court erred in failing to make findings concerning a downward departure based on letters she submitted to the court two months after she was sentenced. We affirm. Breeden did not request a downward departure at her sentencing hearing in August 1995. The district court sentenced her to 37 months imprisonment, the lowest point of her guideline range. In October 1995, Breeden wrote to the district court requesting a sentence of home confinement because of the hardship her imprisonment was causing her two teenage sons. Breeden's former employer also wrote the court that he would be happy to hire her again if she were on home detention. The court subsequently granted Breeden's motion to supplement the record on appeal with the two letters. Breeden now contends that the district court erred in failing to make additional findings concerning the effect of the letters on thesentence previously imposed. We disagree. By not requesting a departure at the sentencing hearing, Breeden forfeited the issue. Most important, because the original sentence was not in error, once the district court unequivocally stated the sentence and imposed it, the court lacked authority to change it. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c); United States v. Fraley , 988 F.2d 4, 7 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report Fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Dated:      August 14, 2009 | By: /s/      Michael      Forster            |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Michael      Forster                                                                                     |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                             |
# A typhoon is pictured in the South Pacific Ocean

iss063e012659 (May 13, 2020) --- The International Space Station's robotic arm, the 57.7-foot-long Canadarm2, crosses the frame with a typhoon pictured below in the South Pacific Ocean.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/a-typhoon-is-pictured-in-the-south-pacific-ocean-49897910456-o/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- International Space Station
TakenMay 13, 2020Image CreditNASASize5568x3712pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jan 03, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Mark A. Garcia								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Alpine Air Express, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), we, Eugene Mallette, Chief Executive Officer, and Leslie Hill, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


/s/ Eugene Mallette
-------------------
Eugene Mallette
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Leslie Hill
-----------------
Leslie Hill
Chief Financial Officer
# Deep Space Station 35

Deep Space Network, Deep Space Station 35, a 112-foot-wide antenna at Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex near Canberra, Australia.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/canberra-dss-35-05/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenFebruary 15, 2017Image CreditNASASize1280x1920pxNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Aug 07, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman