alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 4, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JANET BOESER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

ANTHONY D. SHARP; VALDORO

DEVELOPMENT, LLC; VALDORO

SALES & MARKETING, LLC; STEVE

LUNNEY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-1187

(D.C. No. 1:03-CV-00031-WDM-MEH) 

ORDER

Valdoro Development, LLC’s “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal” is

granted and this appeal is dismissed. See Fed R. App. P. Rule 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 09-1187 Document: 01018471314 Date Filed: 08/04/2010 Page: 1
**National Aeronautics and Space Administration **

----

----

# An Annotated Bibliography of the Apollo Program

##### Compiled by Roger D. Launius and J.D. Hunley

##### Published as Monographs in Aerospace History, Number 2, July1994.

----

----

### Table of Contents

----

- Preface 
- General Works 
- The Space Race 
- Decision 
- Apollo Technology 
- Operations 
- Popular Culture and Promotion 
- Science 
- Astronauts 
- The Management of the Apollo Program 
- Juvenile Literature 

----

histinfo@hq.nasa.gov
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
L. M ONEKE THOM A S, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. C AR OLYN W . C OLVIN, Ac ting C om m issione r of Soc i a l Se c urity Adm inistra

tion, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-36162 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00572-JPD
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington Jam e s P. Donohue II, M a gistra t e Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Ja nua ry 26, 2015 B e fore : GOODW IN, PR EGER SON, a nd B ER ZON, C irc uit Judge s . Larre te y e r M one ke Thom a s a ppe a ls the distric t

c ourt’ s de c ision a ffirm ing the C om m issione r of Soc ia l Se c urity ’ s de nia l of he r a pplic ation for supplem e nta l
se c urity inc om e unde r Title XVI of the Soc ia l Se c urity Ac t. W e re vie w the distric t
c ourt’ s orde r de novo, a

nd m ay se t a side the de nia l of be n e fits only if it is not



# FIL ED SEP 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.supporte d by substa ntia l e vide nc e or is ba se d on le ga l e rror. Molina v . Astrue , 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th C ir. 2012). W h e re e vide nc e is susc e p tible to m ore tha n one
ra tiona l inte rpre tation, we m ust uphold the

a dm inistra

tive la w judge ’ s (“ ALJ” ) findings “ if the y

are supporte d by

infe re nc e s re a sona

b ly draw n from

the re c ord.” Id. at 1111. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e a ffirm
. Thom a s’ s c onte n tion tha

t the ALJ e rre d in a ffording little we ight to Dr. C onne ll’ s opinion re ga

rding he r soc ia l func tioning la c ks m e rit. The ALJ provide d spe c ific and le gitim ate re a sons, supporte d by substa ntia l e vide nc e in the re c ord, for the a sse ssm e nt of Dr. C onne ll’ s opinion. Se e Bay liss v . Barnhart , 427 F.3d 1211, 1216 (9th C ir. 2005). Thom a s’ s c onte ntion tha t the ALJ e rre d in finding tha t Thom a s’ s a lle gations re ga rding he r m e nta l im

pa irm e nts we re not c re dible a l so la c ks m e rit. The ALJ offe re d spe c ific , c le ar and c onvinc i ng re a sons for finding Thom a s not c re dible in light of her da ily a c t ivitie s, he r fa ilure to follow tre atm e nt
and the la c k of obje c tive support for he r a lle gations. Se e Linge nfe lte r v . Astrue , 504 F.3d 1028, 1040 (9th C ir. 2007); se ealso C armic k lev . C omm’r Soc . Se c . Admin ., 533 F.3d 1155, 1161 (9th C ir. 2008). AFFIRM E D.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Partners, LP on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief
Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                                  /s/ Edward E. Cohen
                                  Edward E. Cohen
                                  Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
                                  March 16, 2005
#### The State *v.*Turner.—In error.

Saturday, *December*21.

THE statute authorizing the clerks of Courts, in vacation, to give “ permits” to retail spirituous liquors, &c., does not apply to grocery keepers. Stat. 1832, p. 259.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001092789
<NAME> REXADON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,981
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,015
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
- Home
- Commercial Space
- Commercial Crew Program

- CCP Home
- About CCP
- Current/Upcoming Missions   - SpaceX Crew-8
  - Boeing Crew Flight Test
- CCP Blog
- Multimedia   - NASA Image Library
  - Flickr
- Media Resources

# Commercial Crew Program

NASA’s Commercial Crew Program is delivering on its goal of safe, reliable, and cost-effective human transportation to and from the International Space Station from the United States through a partnership with American private industry.

                                Learn More about Commercial Crew Program

All Crewed Missions

## NASA’s SpaceX Crew-8

The ninth flight of the Dragon spacecraft with people as part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program launched March 3, 2024, for a six-month science mission aboard the International Space Station.
Learn More

## Latest Commercial Crew Program News

				More CCP News                			

36 Min Read
Crew Flight Test: The Astronauts

News Release3 Min Read
NASA to Host a Pair of Briefings for Starliner Crew Flight

66 Min Read
Crew Flight Test: The Mission
3 Min Read
NASA Engineer Chris Lupo Receives 2024 Federal Engineer Award
Article1 Min Read
A Tranquil Sunrise
Image Article

## At the Station

Matthew Dominick
Spacecraft commander currently stationed in the ISS on NASA's SpaceX Crew-8.

Michael Barratt
Pilot currently stationed in the ISS on NASA's SpaceX Crew-8.

Jeanette Epps
Mission specialist currently stationed in the ISS on NASA's SpaceX Crew-8.

Alexander Grebenkin
Mission specialist currently stationed in the ISS on NASA's SpaceX Crew-8.

Loral O'Hara
Flight engineer currently stationed in the ISS for Expedition 70.

Oleg Kononenko
Flight engineer currently stationed in the ISS for Expedition 70.

Nikolai Chub
Flight engineer currently stationed in the ISS for Expedition 70.

## 				Learn More or Contact Us			

## Media Resources

Browse through quick links for current and upcoming missions, view NASA's launch schedule, access archived content, and more.

## Boeing Updates

Read about the latest Boeing updates.

## SpaceX Updates

Read about the latest SpaceX updates.

## Meet the Team

Meet the CCP leadership team and read their biographies here.

## Flickr Gallery

View and download photos from CCP's Flickr account.

## Public-Private Approach

Learn more about the public-private approach driving our program.

## Children's Artwork Calendar Contest

Learn more about this year's Children's Artwork Calendar Contest.

## Press Kit

Learn more about NASA's Commercial Crew Program through our digital press kit.
				Download Now                                     about Press Kit

@NASA@NASAKennedy@NASACommercialCrew@Space_Station

@NASA@NASAKennedy@Commercial_Crew@Space_Station

@NASA@NASAKennedy@ISS

@NASA@Space_Station

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space

Commercial Space

Active Astronauts
#### Martha I. Reed v. Alfred Reed.

*Divorce*— Alimony.

Where the proofs show that, at about the time a bill for divorce was filed, the husband was the owner of several parcels of land of considerable value, and was possessed of considerable personal property, and of an interest in his father’s estate worth at least §7,000, an award of §2,000 permanent alimony is reasonable.

*601Appeal from Wayne. (Beilly, J.)

Argued July 1, 1891.

Decided July 28, 1891.

Bill for divorce. Defendant appeals.

Decree affirmed.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

*Atkinson, Carpenter, Brooke & Haigh,*for complainant.

*John J. Speed,*for defendant.

Grant, J.

Complainant obtained a decree of divorce from defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. Defendant appeals, claiming—

> 1. That the decree should be reversed for lack of evidence that the parties were not acting in collusion.

> 2. That too large an amount was decreed for alimony.

We think the proof sufficient to show that there was no collusion between the parties.

The court decreed alimony in the sum of $2,000, the same to be -in full satisfaction of complainant’s claim to dower, if the amount was paid or secured within 60 days. The proofs show that about the time the bill was filed the defendant was the owner of several parcels of land of considerable value; that he was also possessed of considerable personal property, and of an interest in his father’s estate worth at least $7,000.- We think the award of alimony by the court was very reasonable, under the circumstances and situation of the parties.

The defendant attempted to show the transfer of the most of his property to his brother. It is evident that these transfers were not in good faith.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
#### Klinger, and Others *v.*Brownell.

In case of a judgment against a defendant by default for not appearing, the record must show, in. some manner, that process had been served on him. In a suit against several-persons on a joint contract, the plaintiff cannot, in general, entér a *nolle prosequi*as to one.of the defendants, .and take judgment against the rest.

*Wednesday, June*3.

ERROR to the *Allen*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

This was an action of covenant against several defendants on a joint contract. One of the defendants appeared to the action, but did not plead; as to him, the plaintiff entered a *nolle prosequi.*A suggestion of “not found” was made as to. another defendant. The rest of the defendants made no appearance, and an' interlocutory judgment was entered against them for the default; and afterwards, on the execution, of a writ of inquiry, there was final-judgment, th'ough the record does not show that any of them had notice of the suit. *

*333
      *T.*Johnson, for the plaintiffs.

This judgment is erroneous. When judgment goes against a defendant for default of appearance, the record must show, in some manner, that process was served upon him. 4 Blackf. 2.

A plaintiff who has instituted a joint action founded on a contract cannot, in general, enter a *nolle prosequi*as to one defendant, and take judgment against the rest. There are some exceptions to this rule, but the case presented by the record is not embraced within any of them. No reason is shown why the joint covenant, on which the action was founded, was not as obligatory upon the defendant as to whom the *nolle prosequi*was entered, as upon those against whom judgment was rendered. *Palmer*v. Crosby, 1 Blackf. 139, and n. 3.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the judgment by default inclusive set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
# STS-75 crew preparing for landing

STS075-355-032 (9 March 1996) --- Payload specialist Umberto Guidoni, wearing the shuttle launch and entry garment, prepares for the de-orbit phase of the 16-day flight.  Guidoni represents the Italian Space Agency (ASI).  The seven member crew was launched aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia on February 22, 1996, and landed on March 9, 1996.  Crew members were Andrew M. Allen, mission commander; Scott J. Horowitz, pilot; Franklin R. Chang-Diaz, payload commander; and Maurizio Cheli, European Space Agency (ESA); Jeffrey A. Hoffman and Claude Nicollier, (ESA), all mission specialists; along with Guidoni.

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-sts075-355-032/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenApril 2, 1996ProducerJSCSize1243x1920pxPIA Numbersts075-355-032The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Apr 10, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								   
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
1 min read

# Looking Back: Astronaut Mae Jemison Suits Up For Launch

### NASA

Feb 18, 2016

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

On Sept. 12, 1992, launch day of the STS-47 Spacelab-J mission on space shuttle Endeavour, NASA astronaut Mae Jemison waits as her suit technician, Sharon McDougle, performs a unpressurized and pressurized leak check on her spacesuit at the Operations and Checkout Building at Kennedy Space Center. Dr. Jemison was the science mission specialist on the eight-day joint mission with Japan’s space agency, which included 24 materials science and 20 life sciences experiments. She was the first African-American woman to fly in space. McDougle said of her role as Dr. Jemison’s suit tech, “I just wanted it to be a good experience for her. I’m sure it was probably a little scary for her being the first African-American woman to go into space, so I wanted to do my part in making it special for her too. And for me, because I was excited about being a part of history.”

*Image Credit: NASA*
No. 87-1588.

#### King et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65447-65448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Prince of Wales Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Prince of Wales Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Craig, Alaska, November 5, 2010. The purpose of this meeting is to 
discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2008.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 5, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Craig Ranger District 504 
9th Street, Craig, Alaska. Send written comments to Prince of Wales 
Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 
P.O. Box 500, Craig, AK 99921, or electronically to Rebecca Sakraida, 
RAC Coordinator at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#196b6a78726b78707d78597f6a377f7c7d376c6a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5a7a6b4bea7b4bcb1b495b3a6fbb3b0b1fba0a6">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Sakraida, RAC Coordinator 
Craig Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 826-1601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public.

[[Page 65448]]

Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and 
individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that 
time.

    Dated: October 15, 2010.
Jason C. Anderson,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2010-26892 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Chamberlain *v.*The State.

An indictment against a person for retaining in his possession an instrument for counterfeiting, &c., should describe, by name or, otherwise, the instrument retained, and allege that it was knowingly retained.

*Monday, June*7.

ERROR, to the *Noble*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

The defendant was indicted for retaining in his possession apparatus made use of in counterfeiting the silver coin of the *United States.*The indictment contained six counts. He was found guilty on the fourth and sixth counts, and acquitted on the first, second, third, and fifth. Motion in arrest of judgment overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

The sixth count charges “ that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., had in his possession, and did then and there for a long space of time, to wit, &c., knowingly retain in his possession a certain instrument or apparatus designed, made, and intended to be used, for the purpose of forging or counterfeiting the silver coin of the *United States*of the kind or denomination called half dollars,” &c. This count is too vague and uncertain. It should have described, by name or otherwise, the instrument alleged to be in the defendant’s possession. The gist of the offence consists in retaining the possession of an instrument, of which use is made in counterfeiting, and it should have been described in the indictment, that it might appear to be such an instrument, and that the defendant might prepare his defence.

*574*H.*Cooper, for the plaintiff.

*W. J. Peaslee,*for the state.

The fourth count is defective for the same reason, and, also, for not alleging that the apparatus was “knowingly” retained by the defendant in his possession. R. S. 1838, p. 209, sect. 10.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed. To be certified, &c.
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=7329
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reconditioned Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dirk D.
Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Dirk D. Anderson

Dirk D. Anderson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
August 14, 2002
#### CAROL H. SPRAGGINS v. ANTHONY J. CHESNEY, ET AL.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
# X-59 Wind Tunnel Testing at NASA Glenn

This colorized schlieren image is of a small-scale model of NASA’s X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) airplane taken inside NASA Glenn Research Center’s 8- by- 6-foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel during a recent boom test. The multiple-week campaign produced data sets and shockwave visuals that engineers from the agency’s Commercial Supersonic Technology project will use to validate boom-reducing technologies and sonic boom-predicting capabilities. The boom test at NASA Glenn was one of the final X-59 QueSST wind tunnel evaluations as the agency prepares for the aircraft’s first flight later this year, leading to further low-boom validation in flight in 2023.

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/x-59-wind-tunnel-testing-nasa-glenn/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Aeronautics
- Integrated Aviation Systems Program
- Low Boom Flight Demonstrator
- Quesst
Image CreditNASASize1041x1041pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 11, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Lillian Gipson								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
#### JUDGE PICKETT v. TRYON TRUCKING COMPANY.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*76)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES H. THOMAS.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.