alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

I, Richard M. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Dune Energy, Inc. hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dune Energy, Inc.

Dated: March 29, 2004

                                                     /s/ Richard Cohen
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard M. Cohen

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

September 08, 2015

Hon. Arturo Guajardo Jr.

Hidalgo County Clerk

P. O. Box 58

Edinburg, TX 78540

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00540-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-12-10873-H

Style: THE STATE OF TEXAS v. YESICA ATANAY CARRIZALES PIEDRA

The judgment of the trial court was REVERSED AND REMANDED by this Court on the 

25th day of June, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an 

acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review 

the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which 

the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through 

the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Vance W. Gonzales (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Sergio J. Sanchez

Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13-13-00540-CR this 

________ day of _________________, 2015.

District/County Clerk, 

By :____________________________
##### 



EXHIBIT 31
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             /s/  JAMES L. FARESJames L. FaresChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Certification of Principal Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ JAMES L. FARESJames L. FaresActing Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
1 min read

# Risk of Adverse In-Mission Health and Performance Effects and Long-Term Health Effects Due to Celestial Dust Exposure (Dust Risk)

### Robert E. Lewis

#### Web Community Manager

Mar 20, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

## Contents

              -  Directed Acyclic Graph Files 
              -  Human Research Program 

Lunar dust exposure has not been a hazard since the 1972 Apollo missions. Data collected at that time has provided insight and many years of research. Due to the unique properties of lunar dust (and other celestial bodies), there is a possibility that exposure could lead to serious health effects (e.g., respiratory, cardiopulmonary, ocular, or dermal harm) to the crew or impact crew performance during celestial body missions. Limits have been established based on detailed peer-reviewed studies completed by the Lunar Atmosphere Dust Toxicity Assessment Group (LADTAG) and are specific to the conditions relevant to the lunar surface. The risk will need to be reassessed to ensure appropriate containment if samples are being stored in a habitable environment. 

## Directed Acyclic Graph Files

+ DAG File Information (HSRB Home Page)

+ Celestial Dust Risk DAG and Narrative (PDF)

+ Celestial Dust Risk DAG Code (TXT)

## Human Research Program

+ Risk of Celestial Dust Exposure

+ 2015 August Evidence Report (PDF)

Human System Risks

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

Johnson Space Center

## Related Terms

                - Human Health and Performance

## Explore More

1 min readRisk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration ArchitectureArticle										1 year ago									

1 min readRisk of Bone Fracture due to Spaceflight-induced Changes to BoneArticle										1 year ago									

1 min readRisk of Cardiovascular Adaptations Contributing to Adverse Mission Performance and Health OutcomesArticle										1 year ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Humans In Space

Missions

International Space Station

Solar System
WILLIAM HAKIM BENTLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2979

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 30, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John T. Brown, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney

General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE ALLEGED WILL OF GERARD ARANEO, DECEASED.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied. (See 213 *N.J.Super.*116)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Earl Dietrich, Ian Knight, J.J. Leal, Shannon McLeod, and 

Frontier MWD Systems, LLC v. Weatherford International, 

LLC and Weatherford, U.S., L.P.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00556-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-25169

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Appellants, Earl Dietrich, Ian Knight, J.J. Leal, Shannon McLeod, and Frontier 

MWD Systems, LLC, have file an unopposed motion to abate this appeal until February 

17, 2020, to facilitate settlement. The Court had previously abated this appeal until 

February 3, 2020, at which time the appeal was reinstated. The Court grants the unopposed 

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2). 

This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed form this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket on February 17, 2020. 

The Court will consider an appropriate motion to extend the abatement period. The Court 

will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party or on 

its own motion. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: February 11, 2020
Exhibit 32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of OCTuS, Inc. (“OCTuS”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, Christian J. Soderquist, President and Chief Executive Officer of OCTuS, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OCTuS.
 
 This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to OCTuS and will be retained by OCTuS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Date:  September 26, 2011
 
 /s/ CHRISTIAN J. SODERQUIST
 Christian J. Soderquist
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Leonard P. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer of Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) doeshereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

(a)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 27, 2007 of the Company to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

(b)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9,2007

|            | /s/ LEONARD P.  SHAYKIN                                                |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **Leonard P. Shaykin**                                                 |
| ** ** | ***Chairman of the Board of  Directors and  Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. Thiscertification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000577

29-JAN-2015

10:00 AM
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 6, 2005.



/s/ Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. ThoringtonChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# International Space Station Program Deputy Chief Scientist Meghan Everett

“One of my cornerstone pinnacles [is], ‘Show up to work [and] life with integrity and intent.’ So, accomplish your goals with integrity, intent, and a mission. Stick to that and have the confidence to do that, and be OK with messing up and failing, and have fun with those things." — Meghan Everett, International Space Station Program Deputy Chief Scientist, NASA’s Johnson Space Center

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/meghaneverett-jsc2024e019923/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTakenMarch 11, 2024Image CreditNASA/Josh ValcarcelSize7425x4950pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Mar 21, 2024								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michelle Zajac								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Gordon Link,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TapestryPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

 

(a)                                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30,2005 of the Company to which this certification is attached (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 4, 2005

 
|       | /s/ GORDON LINK                                                     |       |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** ** | **Gordon  Link  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** | ** ** |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andwill be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.  This certification “accompanies” the Form10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
# Ohm’s Law

		Back to search page	

## Audience

Educators

## Grade Levels

Grades 5-8, Grades 9-12, Informal Education

## Subject

Physical Science, Flight and Aeronautics, Physics

## Type

Hands-on Activities

### Ohm’s Law

X-57 Ohm’s Law Activity Guide

Ohm’s law is a scientific law which states that the amount of current flowing through a conductor is directly proportional to the voltage applied to it. Whenever a voltage is applied to a conductor, electrical current flows through it. According to Ohm’s law, if the voltage is higher, more current flows through and if the voltage is lower, less current flows through.

Each student or group needs:
                    - Circuit Template Worksheet
                    - Voltmeter
                    - CR2032 battery
                    - Small binder clip
                    - Approximately 54” double-sided conductive copper foil tape (1/4” width)  Note: you can also use single-sided conductive copper foil tape but will need to fold over the turns if using this kind of tape and will need a slightly longer piece. Double-sided copper foil tape is conductive on both sides. Some copper tape does not have conductive adhesive, so it is only conductive on one side. An internet search will show tutorials about how to do this.
                    - (5) Resistors – Any resistance will work, but 15-100 Ω resistors are recommended.  You can use 2 resistors per student or group instead of 5, but you will have to move them from circuit to another.
                    - Scissors for cutting conductive tape
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES A. BARTS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Argued October 17, 1944

Decided January 4, 1945.

Por the defendant in error, *William A. Wachenfeld.*

Por the plaintiff in error, *Isidor Kalisch*and *Oliver Randolph.*

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancelloe, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Poetee, Wells, Raffeety, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.

*For reversal*— Colie, J. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000891461
<NAME> GREENWICH AIR SERVICES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,266)
<INVENTORY>                                    371,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               555,018
<PP&E>                                         155,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          226,036
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   716,742
<SALES>                                        609,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,038
<CGS>                                          533,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  559,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (820)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
        

</TABLE>
# Sitemap

## January 04, 2006

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2006
- 01
- January 04, 2006

            - Adrift at Saturn
No. 80.

#### Charles S. Reynolds, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Edwin T. Jordan, adm’r, &c. defendant in error.

[1.] In attachment, the defendant, on the day of levy, replevies the property; and the Sheriff thereupon, omits to advertise the levy: *Held,*that this omission does not affect the validity of the subsisting suit against the defendant.

Attachment, in Crawford Superior Court. Decision by Judge Powers, September Term, 1855.

In this case, the defendant moved to dismiss the attachment on the ground, that the levy was not advertised as required by the Statute; it appearing that the defendant had replevied the goods as soon as the attachment was served. The Court refused the motion, and this decision is assigned las error.

Norman, for plaintiff in error.

Culverhouse, for defendant in error.

*By the Court.*

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

The effect of the replevy was to dissolve the attachment; • that is, was to render void the attachment; and was also to substitute for the attachment thus rendered void, another contrivance for effecting the object of the attachment — an appearance. This substitute was the personal obligation of the defendant to appear, “ and to'abide by, and perform the order and judgment” of the Court.

Suppose, therefore, that we admit that the failure to advertise the levy made void (if it be possible to make void that which is already void) the attachment; how did that affect the thing which, before the attachment was made void, was substituted for the attachment? Manifestly, in no way. It *437is no where said, that *this*shall be void for a failure to advertise the levy.

Resides, when the defendant took upon himself the personal ■obligation aforesaid, all was done which an advertisement of the levy could have accomplished. Such an advertisement can serve no other purpose, in, cases of attachment, than to induce the *appearance*of the defendant. When the defendant has appeared — has not only appeared, but has given bond ■and security to abide the judgment in the case, that purpose ;is more than accomplished. *(Cobb’s Dig.*71.) We think the judgment of the Court below ought to be affirmed.