alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,438
<PP&E>                                          11,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,989
<SALES>                                         92,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,982
<CGS>                                           70,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (206)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
| Come along with the seven         U.S. astronauts and all the cosmonauts         that called Mir their home, and visit the sights and sounds of the Shuttle-Mir         Program CD-ROM!  Tour         the Russian Space Station with the STS         missions that took the residents         to Mir and brought them back to Earth.  View         hundreds of photos, videos,         diagrams, as well as computer         generated animations of the         Mir deorbit, collision,         and flyaround. Read         mission status reports, published         documents, news releases, personal letters, oral histories of some of         the people who made the Shuttle-Mir Program successful, and much more. Learn         about the science that was performed         on Mir and the important results         of those experiments. See the         Shuttle-Mir book         online and search the entire site for information.

Choose a link above or below to begin your journey! | 34          1

Choose the photo to view the          increment or mission photo gallery! |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Info about         this CD | Book TOC | Site         Map | Photos | Video         | Diagrams | Search         | Discovery in Space - video         | Documents |        | Science | Children's         Book | Mir Deorbit Animation         | Astronauts, Cosmonauts, and Teams         | Biographies | Oral         Histories |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

RATIFICATION ORDER 

In our capacity as Members of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("MSPB"), we hereby 

ratify the prior appointments of the individuals listed below to the position of MSPB Attorney 

Examiner (commonly known as Administrative Judge), Supervisory Attorney Examiner 

( commonly known as Chief Administrative Judge), or Regional Director, as the case may be, and 

we today approve these appointments as our own under Article II of the Constitution. 

~ ~ · 

KR aymon dL' llllon 

Vice Chairman and Acting Chairman 

~ /'-f .1-z_ 2-

DATE 

Member 

DATE 
Appointments Ratified 

Laura Albornoz, Regional Director 

Joel Alexander, Attorney Examiner 

Chizoma Ihekere Anokwute, Attorney 

Examiner 

Craig Berg, Attorney Examiner 

Monique Binswanger, Attorney Examiner 

Samantha Black, Attorney Examiner 

Richard Brian Bohlen, Attorney Examiner 

Scott Borrowman, Attorney Examiner 

William Boulden, Regional Director 

David Brooks, Attorney Examiner 

Grace Carter, Attorney Examiner 

Jennifer Cassell, Attorney Examiner 

Jeremiah Cassidy, Regional Director 

Theresa Chung, Attorney Examiner 

Silva de la Cruz, Attorney Examiner 

Cynthia De Nardi, Attorney Examiner 

Nicole Decrescenzo, Attorney Examiner 

Sarah Diouf, Attorney Examiner 

Paul Ditomasso, Attorney Examiner 

Maria Dominguez, Attorney Examiner 

Daniel Fine, Attorney Examiner 

Andrew Flick, Attorney Examiner 

Lindsay Young Harrell, Attorney Examiner 

John Alick Henderson, Attorney Examiner 

Edward Hertwig, Attorney Examiner 

Pamela Jackson, Attorney Examiner 

Franklin Kang, Attorney Examiner 

Katherine Beaumont Kern, Attorney 

Examiner 

Thomas Lanphear, Regional Director 

David Lidow, Attorney Examiner 

Sherry Linville, Attorney Examiner 

Daniel Mclaughlin, Attorney Examiner 

Patrick Mehan, Attorney Examiner 

Melissa-Mehring, Attorney Examiner 

Patricia Miller, Attorney Examiner 

Stephanie Miller, Attorney Examiner 

Stephen Mish, Supervisory Attorney 

Examiner 

Jeffrey Morris, Attorney Examiner 

John Andrew Niedrick, Attorney Examiner 

Jennifer P~o, Attorney Examiner 

·Michael Perry, Attorney Examiner 

Sharon Pomeranz, Attorney Examiner 

Gregory Prophet, Attorney Examiner 

Nina Puglia, Attorney Examiner 

Tamara Ribas, Attorney Examiner 

Christoph Riddle, Attorney Examiner 

Evan Roth, Attorney Examiner 

Michael Rudisill, Attorney Examiner 

Joann Ruggiero, Attorney Examiner 

Martha Russo, Attorney Examiner 

Michele Schroeder, Regional Director 

Mary Senoo, Attorney Examiner 

Michael Shachat, Attorney Examiner 

Gregory Smith, Attorney Examiner 

Sara Snyder, Regional Director 

Christopher Sprague, Attorney Examiner 

Kasandra Styles, Attorney Examiner 

Kara Svendsen, Attorney Examiner 

Mark Syska, Attorney Examiner 

Ronald Weiss, Attorney Examiner 

Glen Williams, Attorney Examiner 

Daniel Yehl, Attorney Examiner 

Sherry Zamora, Attorney Examiner
CERTIFICATIONS  I,  Tyrus C. Young, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15f-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,  or caused such internal control over financial reporting  to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 22, 2010  /s/ Tyrus C. Young Tyrus C. Young Chief Financial Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed July 3, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-296

Lower Tribunal No. F19-6448

________________

Pablo Lyle,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa 

Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Markus/Moss PLLC and David Oscar Markus and Mona E. Markus, for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Dale G. Nielsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

/s/ Dale G. Nielsen
By: Dale G. Nielsen
Chief Executive Officer
March 22, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            PHOTOELECTRON CORPORATION

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photoelectron Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
M. Nomikos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 29, 2002 and
    results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended
    June 29, 2002.

                                              /s/ Peter M. Nomikos
                                              --------------------

                                              Peter M. Nomikos, Chief Executive
                                              Officer

                                              August 19, 2002
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER CHAMBERLAIN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
|                                                         |   | Three      Months ended June 30, |   | Six      Months ended June. 30, |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                                         |   | 2008                             |   | 2007                            |   | 2008 |   | 2007 |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
| Computation      of loss per common share:                   |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |
|         Net loss applicable to common  shares |   | $(1,345,041)                     |   | $(1,229,787)                    |   | $(2,092,620) |   | $(2,575,674) |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|         Weighted average number of common shares   |   | 107,283,989                 |   | 106,608,465                |   | 107,228,769  |   | 105,455,375  |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|         Net income (loss) per common share         |   | $(0.01)                          |   | $(0.01)                         |   | $(0.02) |   | $(0.02) |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
| Computation      of income ( loss ) per common               |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|         share assuming full dilution**             |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
|                                                         |   |                             |   |                            |   |   |   |   |
NUMBER 13-21-00225-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LEONARDO MOLINA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 445th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Leonardo Molina, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his 

conviction in trial court cause number 2020-DCR-2011. The trial court’s certification of 

the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has 
2

a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 

44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases 

from non-appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system 

unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and expense associated with 

non-appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 

S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 

912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Within thirty days of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Edward A.

Stapleton III, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification. 

If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is 

further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, 

identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 

2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be 

modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not 

addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case 

law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See 

Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614–15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in 

the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record 
3

documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting 

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of July, 2021.
# Office of the Chief Scientist Executive Officer Maria Santos

"When you meet someone who is doing something different but yet, you can relate to them because of what they look like or their background, it makes a huge difference." — Maria Santos, Executive Officer of the Office of the Chief Scientist, NASA Headquarters

Read More

                    -  Facebook PinterestX
-  LinkedIn Emailhttps://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/office-of-chief-scientist-executive-officer-maria-santos/Copy URL to clipboard>DownloadShareTags- Hispanic Heritage Month
- Women's History Month
Size1041x694pxThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery.
- About NASA's Mission
Join Us- Home
- News & Events
- Multimedia
- NASA+
- Missions
- Humans in Space
- Earth & Climate
- The Solar System
- The Universe
- Science
- Aeronautics
- Technology
- Learning Resources
- About NASA
- NASA en Español
Follow NASA-   
-   
-   
-   
- 
- More NASA Social Accounts
- NASA Newsletters
- Sitemap
- For Media
- Privacy Policy
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
- Office of the IGBudget & Annual Reports
Agency Financial Reports
Contact NASA
Accessibility
-  									Page Last Updated:								  								Jun 20, 2023								 
-  									Page Editor:								  									Michelle Zajac								 
-  								Responsible NASA Official:							  								Abigail Bowman
| (logo) Prudential | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500 |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street,14th Floor

Charlotte,NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:       Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through, **WFRBS****2014-C22**

Period:  **September 1.****2014 to December 31. 2014****(the****"Reporting Period")**

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of September 1, 2014 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i)             a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)           to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

Effective as of February 24, 2015

 

 

/s/ Hal Collett

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources,Inc.
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 8, 2005.



/s/ Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. ThoringtonChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.