alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMA-
                          TION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          CONTAINED IN THE FOTOBALL USA, INC. FORM 10-QSB
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
                          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  236,312
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         4,126,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                            158,251
<INVENTORY>                                           4,102,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8,654,323
<PP&E>                                                2,977,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,612,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       10,048,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,889,489
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 27,817
<OTHER-SE>                                            6,830,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         10,048,879
<SALES>                                              11,874,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     11,874,559
<CGS>                                                 7,267,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,642,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       60,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         905,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                             90,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     815,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            815,289
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .28


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ L. George Klaus                                                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | L. George Klaus Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Michael A. Piraino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Piraino                                                                                              
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Michael A. Piraino Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41241

c/w No. 12-41248

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO JAVIER FLORES-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-206-1

USDC No. 1:12-CR-522-1

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier

Flores-Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Jimenez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the records

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 6, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41241 Document: 00512265468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2013
No. 12-41241

c/w No. 12-41248

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the consolidated

appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41241 Document: 00512265468 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

p0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144270 

CHANDU MANSHARAMANI and 

SAVITRI BHAMA M.D., 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 144270 

 COA: 299870 

Macomb CC: 2008-005714-NO 

GREGORY D. DEMOPOULOS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALONZO SHELLEY.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender
Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating
Agent and Custodian , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C18 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I,
Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of
its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|/s/ Leslie Hayton | 
|----------------- | 
|Leslie Hayton     | 
|Managing Director | 
|Wells Fargo Bank  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3052614-OCT-201107:56 AM
#### GARY J. MAHON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, ET AL.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*28)
#### Application of Murray E. GOTTESMAN.

Docket 28945.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 1, 1964.

Decided June 2, 1964.

Henry K. Chapman, New York City, for petitioner-defendant.

Gerald Walpin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern Dist. of New York, Donald J. Cohn, Edward M. Shaw and John R. Bartels, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel), for the United States.

Before LUMBARD Chief Judge, and MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner-defendant Murray E. Gottesman seeks an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing Judge Bonsai to grant petitioner’s motion for a severance pursuant to Rules 8(b) and 14, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Petitioner is a co-defendant with Roy M. Cohn in an indictment charging him with two counts (Nine and Ten) of perjury and Cohn of three counts of perjury and four counts of obstructing justice. A conspiracy count was dismissed at the end of the first trial. The defendants now await retrial on June 9th on the remaining counts, following a mistrial declared after the jury had deliberated more than three days.

Joinder of the counts in the indictment was permissible and proper under Rule 8(b). This propriety is not affected by the dismissal of the conspiracy count. Rule 14 serves a different function, namely, to permit a defendant to show prejudice from the joinder. Technically, it can be argued that every defendant may be prejudiced as a result of being tried with some other defendant. However, Rule 8(b) permits joinder. Counts Four (Cohn), Nine and Ten (Gottesman) cover the same subject matter, namely, the same alleged meeting with Garfield and Swann at the same time and place.

The prospective trial judge, Judge Bonsai, carefully considered the elements essential to a proper determination of petitioner’s application and found no showing of prejudice.

 A motion for a severance is addressed to the discretion of the Court. This discretion will not be interfered with by way of a writ of mandamus un*976less a strong showing of prejudice is made. See Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84, 75 S.Ct. 158, 99 L.Ed. 101, 45 A.L.R.2d 1308 (1954). The fact situation in United States v. Charnay, 211 F.Supp. 904, S.D.N.Y.1962, in which severances were ordered, was sufficiently different as Judge Bonsai pointed out in his opinion.

Petition denied.

HAYS, Circuit Judge

(concurring in the result).

I concur in the result. Mandamus is sought here for the purpose of pressing a premature appeal. I would deny the motion on this ground without reaching the merits.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         349,676
<SECURITIES>                                 3,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,379,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,243,932
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,485,615
<PP&E>                                       2,939,559<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,425,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,503,914
<BONDS>                                     17,543,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,287
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,664,795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,425,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,984,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,112,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,885,945
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,292,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,306,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,306,489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)
<FN>
<F1>PP&E DOES NOT APPLY - FIGURE REPRESENTS OTHER ASSETS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### REBECCA KLEIN AND ANDRE KLEIN v. FRED RIPPE, T/A TOWN DELI, ET AL.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2019

ANSELME FIDELIS SOP TAGNE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-272-477)

Submitted: March 15, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin K. Fogam, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul J.

McNulty, United States Attorney, Gerard J. Mene, Assistant United

States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anselme Fidelis Sop Tagne, a native and citizen of

Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture. 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Sop Tagne fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Sop Tagne

cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of

removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1063 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1063

 Designating room H-226 of the United States Capitol as the ``Lincoln 
                                Room''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2018

Mr. LaHood (for himself, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. 
Lipinski, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Danny K. Davis of 
  Illinois, Mr. Rush, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Foster, Mr. 
  Bost, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
 Kinzinger, and Mrs. Bustos) submitted the following resolution; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating room H-226 of the United States Capitol as the ``Lincoln 
                                Room''.

Whereas Abraham Lincoln was elected to the House of Representatives in 1846 to 
        represent the 7th Congressional District of Illinois in the Thirtieth 
        Congress from March 1847 to March 1849;
Whereas Abraham Lincoln served the people for 15 years as a State Legislator, 
        Member of Congress, and President of the United States;
Whereas Abraham Lincoln was a member of the Illinois General Assembly for four 
        terms and was respected as an effective leader of his party and a 
        popular campaigner;
Whereas during Congressman Lincoln's tenure, the room now designated as room H-
        226 of the United States Capitol was used as the post office of the 
        House, where he spent almost every morning exchanging stories near the 
        fireplace;
Whereas the old post office space was just steps away from Congressman Lincoln's 
        desk, where he worked and voted and is now marked by a gold plaque on 
        the floor of Statuary Hall;
Whereas Congressman Lincoln was known to be the champion story-teller of the 
        Capitol, having an endless repertoire of tales;
Whereas Abraham Lincoln was one of America's greatest presidents, whose life was 
        a story of adversity, perseverance, and leadership; and
Whereas when the United States was at its darkest hour, Abraham Lincoln fought 
        to end slavery and brought the country back together: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That room H-226 of the United States Capitol is 
designated as the ``Lincoln Room''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Robert D. McDermott, Chief Financial Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT D. MCDERMOTT                     
|                       |  |     |  | Robert D. McDermott, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Financial Statements for the 6 months ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for three months ended September
30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           7,787
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   70,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                     90,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               221,559
<PP&E>                                                         407,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  80,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 730,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           91,020
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                           158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     450,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   730,423
<SALES>                                                        125,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               126,241
<CGS>                                                           19,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  105,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (3,547)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               4,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    570
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                570
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       570
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .00



</TABLE>