alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, time and agenda for the first quarter meetings of the National Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

# DATES:

The meetings for the fourth quarter will be held on the following dates:

Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

These meetings will be held via conference call.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small Business Development Centers.

The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the following issues pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:

—Follow up on ASBDC Annual Conference.

—White Paper Issues.

—SBA Update.

—Member Roundtable.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The meeting is open to the public, however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by fax or e-mail. Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone 202-619-1612, Fax 202-481-0134, e-mail                         *alanna.falcone@sba.gov*.                    

Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the information above.

Dan S. Jones,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-25727 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
	  Contact & Locations
    
    Search & Site Index Contacts & Locations
Please update your links to this page. New locations for Contacts & Locations: https://www.mspb.gov/about/contact.htm


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
Exhibit 4.386

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 173864 dated January 18, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

telecommunication services for Cable Broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

Research and production association «Progressivniye Technologii»

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 

(Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1025001631137

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

5013008091

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

7A, Amet-Khan Sultana str.,Zhukovsky, Moscow region, 140180

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until January 18, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 06, 2019 No. 266-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
# USACE Vicksburg District signs agreement with City of Clinton for water system rehabilitation

VICKSBURG, Miss. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Vicksburg District signed a Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) with the City of Clinton, Mississippi, Friday, August 21 as part of the Mississippi Environmental Infrastructure Program (Section 592).

The PPA will rehabilitate Clinton’s water system, including the refurbishment of a one million gallon elevated water storage tank, and implement a variety of improvements such as the installation of tank mixing equipment and replacement of water mains. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, the Section 592 Program provides assistance to non-federal interests in Mississippi. Assistance can include design and construction for water-related environmental infrastructure, as well as resource protection and development projects. According to PPA regulations, assistance may be provided only for projects that are publically owned, and the non-federal interest must enter into a written cost share agreement to furnish its required cooperation for the project. The cost share for this project will be 75 percent federally funded and 25 percent non-federally funded.

The signing ceremony was held at Clinton City Hall. Mayor Phil Fisher signed the agreement for the City, and USACE Vicksburg Commander Col. Robert Hilliard signed for USACE. 

“This agreement provides the USACE Vicksburg District with the opportunity to help the City of Clinton sustain and protect its infrastructure,” said Hilliard. “The Vicksburg District is proud to continue its long, mutually beneficial relationship with the City of Clinton, and we are eager to provide our assistance for this vital effort.”

The USACE Vicksburg District is engineering solutions to the nation’s toughest challenges. The Vicksburg District encompasses a 68,000-square-mile area across portions of Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana that holds seven major river basins and incorporates approximately 460 miles of mainline Mississippi River levees. The Vicksburg District is engaged in hundreds of projects and employs approximately 1,100 personnel.

**Contact**

Release no. 20-065

City of Clinton

water system rehabilitation

infrastructure improvement
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the "Servicer").

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
Opinion issued September 14, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 2
- 002 25
- CR NO. 01
- 22
- 00226
- CR

——————————— LANCE NERO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4

Harri s County, Texas Trial Court Case No s . 2286260 and 2323605

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Lance Nero , appealed from the judgments revoking community supervision imposed on March 21, 2022 in the underlying cases

. The notices of appeal were filed by appellant’s court appointed trial counsel. A ppellant’s2

court

- appointed trial counsel also moved to withdraw as appell ant’s counsel in each of the underlying cases . The trial court allowed counsel to withdraw, found that appellant was indigent for the purpose of employing counsel and paying for the clerk’s and reporter’s records, and g ranted appellant’s motions to appoin t appellate counsel. However, the trial court did not appoint counsel to represent appellant on appeal at that time. Accordingly, o n June 29, 2023, the Court abated each of these appeals and directed the trial court to appoint counsel to represent appella nt in his appeals. On August 9, 2023, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed with the Court which
includ ed a July 6, 2023 o rder appointing Taylor Allison Landis Mathis as counsel for appellant in his appeals. On August 31, 2023, a ppellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeal s , sta t ing
that he “no longer wishe [d] to prosecute his appeal[s]” and request ing that “this
Court grant [ his ] motion and dismiss th [ e se] appeal s .” Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion, and this Court has not issued a decision. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a). Further, more than ten days have passed , and the State has not expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3 (a)(2).3

Accordingly, we reinstate the case s on the Court’s active docket, grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal s . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
EXHIBIT 23

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 001-37795) pertaining to the Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of our report dated March 2, 2017, with respect to the combined consolidated financial statements and schedule of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

McLean, Virginia

 

March 2, 2017
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERTO SOSA.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26780]



[[Page 65385]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 817, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Thursday, 
November 4, 2010.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after January 1, 2011.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 
that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 
that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange 
of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the 
Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael P. McDonald, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202-606-
8322.

Michael McDonald,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26780 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00012-CR

Lonnie Charles Williams, III

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 1

of Denton County (CR-2016-07798-

C)

January 25, 2018

Opinion by Justice Bleil

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Charles Bleil____________________

 Justice Charles Bleil
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Ablynx NV (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wim Ottevaere, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2018



|                              |  |                        
|----------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Wim Ottevaere            
|Name:                         |  | Wim Ottevaere          
|Title:                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
# Sitemap

## August 24, 2021

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2021
- 08
- August 24, 2021

            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts train at the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility
            - Astronauts Matthias Maurer and Raja Chari during a training session
            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts during a training session
            - Astronauts Thomas Marshburn and Kayla Barron during a training session
            - Astronauts Raja Chari and Kayla Barron during a training session
            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts train at the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility
            - Astronauts Matthias Maurer and Raja Chari prepare for spacewalk training
            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts pose for a portrait during water survival training
            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts pose for a portrait during water survival training
            - SpaceX Crew-3 astronauts participate in water survival training
**AMENDED DLD

- 232 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 3

- 1824

___________ IN RE: DAVID GEORGE LUSICK , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the Un ited States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to Civ. No. 12

- cv - 05150 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. May 9, 2013 Before: AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES , Circuit Judges (Opi nion filed : June 10, 2013 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM David Lusick has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking that we order
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to consider a complaint he says he filed on September 1, 2012

— a complaint that the District Court
said it did not receive. 1

1 Although it is not clear whether the District Court ever received Lusick’s complaint in 2012, we would remind the D istrict Court that if it denies an applicant’s motion to He also asks us to order that Court to serve and consider some of his other filings, and reassign a different judge to his District Court proceedings.2 We will deny Lusick’s petition. Since the time Lusick filed his mandamus petition, he has complied with the District Court ’s order to file a new complaint. The District Court has also randomly reassigned the procee dings to another judge. Thus, those requests are moot. We are confident that the District Court will also serve and/or consider Lusick’s other filings, to the extent it deems appropriate. If Lusick is unhappy with any of the District Court’s rulings, he can raise those issues on appeal. See Cheney
v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380

- 81 (2004) (mandamus is not a substitute for appeal). 2

proceed in forma pauperis, it should retain the unfiled complaint until any appeals are complete.

2 Lusick’s remaining motions in this Court are denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JEFFREY A. KEOWIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1885 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clayton R. Kaeiser, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General,Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
# Sitemap

## September 07, 1962

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1962
- 09
- September 07, 1962

            - Altitude Chamber Tests
# Sitemap

## June 16, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 06
- June 16, 2009

            - Preparing Endeavour
            - Shedding Light on Dark Gamma Ray Bursts
#### Kegler, Admx., Appellee, *v.*Kempter et al., Appellees; Clark, Appellant.

(No. 6106

Decided March 9, 1942.)

*280
      *Mr. Albert D. Castellini,*for appellee Maria J. Kegler, Admx.

*Messrs. Peek, Shaffer, Williams & Gorman,*for appellant.

By the Court.

The question presented in" this case is’ whether the daughter of the wife of the testator takes, under Section 10504-73, General Code, the estate which her mother would have taken under the will of her husband had she survived him.

It is conceded that the Supreme Court in *Schaefer*v. *Bernhardt,*76 Ohio St., 443, 81 N. E., 640, construed the almost identical provision as that involved in the instant case, found in the code section .referred to above, to include only those related by consanguinity to the testator. As the wife was not so related, the daughter cannot take, and the gift to the wife, must lapse unless this court should give to the section a different construction.

It is urged upon us that the testator considered his wife’s daughter as his daughter and so referred to her; that this fact should be considered in construing the will; and that the statute should be considered as a part of the will.

As we view it, this would be giving the daughter the status of an adopted child, when no adoption proceedings had been taken, and would be permitting a party to change or amend Section 10504-73, General Code, to include relatives by affinity, when the Supreme Court has decided that its benefits are limited to relatives by consanguinity.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Matthews, P. J., Hamilton and Ross, JJ., concur.