Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65509 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2762’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

Issued: October 19, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26788 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–728] 

In the Matter of Collaborative System 

Products and Components Thereof (II); 

Notice of Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motion To 

Amend the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 13) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia 

Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4737. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on July 19, 2010, based on a complaint 

filed by eInstruction Corporation of 

Denton, Texas on May 12, 2010. 75 FR 

41889 (Jul. 19, 2010). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain collaborative 

system products and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

various claims of United States Patent 

No. 6,930,673. The complaint named 

the following respondents: Promethean 

Inc. of Alpharetta, Georgia, and 

Promethean Technology Shenzhen Ltd. 

of Shanghai, China. 

On September 14, 2010, eInstruction 

moved to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to add 

Promethean Ltd. of Blackburn, 

Lancashire, United Kingdom as a 

respondent to this investigation. On 

September 30, 2010, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, Order No. 13, granting the 

motion to amend. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

Issued: October 19, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26775 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Pursuant to 28 CFR 50.7 and 

Department of Justice policy, notice is 

hereby given that on October 14, 2010 

a proposed Consent Decree with 

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP 

(‘‘Georgia-Pacific’’) was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Wisconsin in a case 

captioned United States and the State of 

Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Case No. 

10–C–910 (E.D. Wis.). The Complaint in 

that case alleges claims against GeorgiaPacific and eleven other defendants 

concerning polychlorinated biphenyl 

contamination at the Lower Fox River 

and Green Bay Superfund Site in 

northeastern Wisconsin (the ‘‘Site’’). 

The proposed Consent Decree would 

resolve the United States’ and the 

State’s claims against Georgia-Pacific on 

terms and conditions set forth in the 

Consent Decree. Under the proposed 

settlement, Georgia-Pacific would 

stipulate that it is liable, along with 

other defendants, for performance of all 

required cleanup work at the Site 

downstream from a line across the River 

slightly upstream of the company’s 

paper mill in the City of Green Bay. 

Georgia-Pacific would in turn receive a 

covenant not to sue and statutory 

contribution protection for portions of 

the River upstream from that line. As 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES