alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.23

    

     

      

    
      	
               

            	
              
                

              

            
	 	 
	 	
              Lan Huang, Ph.D. 

              

              Chief Executive Officer 

              

              
                BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

                
                  28 Liberty Street, 39th Floor

                

              

              New York, NY 10005 

              Tel: 646.305.6387 

              

            


    

    
      

      

      January 1, 2020

       

      
        	
                RE:

              	
                ANNUAL SALARY RAISE

              


      

      Edward Dongheng Liu

      

      

      Dear Edward,

      

      

      We are pleased to offer you an increase in your annual base salary from $300,000.00






          to $430,000.00. In addition, we are increasing your annual bonus opportunity to 45% of annual salary (otherwise subject to the
        same terms and conditions in your Employment Agreement (defined below). This change will take effect on January 1, 2020.

       

      Except as expressly provided in this letter, your employment agreement with BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated as of March 26, 2018, (your “Employment Agreement”) shall remain in full force and effect.

      

      

      
        Again, congratulations on your achievement and we wish you all the very best in the coming years. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding your new compensation package.

      

       

      Sincerely,

      

      

      
        
          	
                  /s/ Lan Huang

                	
                   

                
	
                  Lan Huang, Ph.D.

                	
                   

                
	
                   

                	
                   

                
	
                  Agreed:

                	 
	 	 
	
                  /s/ Edward Dongheng Liu

                	
                   

                
	
                  Edward Dongheng Liu
2 min read

# NASA Begins Feedback Process for Moon to Mars Architecture

### Rachel H. Kraft

May 18, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

As NASA builds a blueprint for human exploration throughout the solar system for the benefit of humanity, efforts to advance the agency’s Moon to Mars architecture concept development approach are underway.

As NASA builds a blueprint for human exploration throughout the solar system for the benefit of humanity, efforts to advance the agency’s Moon to Mars architecture concept development approach are underway. NASA will host a virtual webinar at 2 p.m. EDT, Monday, May 22, in which leaders from the agency’s Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate will discuss how U.S. commercial industry, academic communities, and others can contribute to NASA’s evolving Moon to Mars architecture approach.

NASA released the outcomes of its first Architecture Concept Review in April and is beginning the process to seek feedback that will feed forward into future iterations of the agency’s Architecture Definition Document, a deep dive into the Moon to Mars exploration strategy campaign segments, the architecture elements and functional allocations, and crewed and uncrewed reference missions.

The webinar will review the documents released in April and preview a June workshop for invited commercial companies and academic institutions to share feedback on NASA’s architecture.

Those interested in attending the webinar can click here to join.

NASA began developing its Architecture Definition Document in late 2022 as a detailed look at how the Moon to Mars Objectives can be broken into achievable functions and traced to specific architecture elements. The agency plans yearly Architecture Concept Reviews to incorporate new technological capabilities and evolving objectives.  

Under Artemis, NASA has set a vision to explore more of the Moon than ever before. With the crew for Artemis II recently named, the agency plans to return humans to the Moon and establish a cadence of missions starting at the lunar south pole region. These missions set up a long-term presence to inform future exploration of Mars and other potential destinations in the solar system. 

**Moon to Mars Architecture Webinar Resources**
            - Briefing package
            - Webinar recording
No. 6

#### Eusebius Slayton, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Thomas M. Jones, defendant in error.

[1.] When a judgment is transferred, and tlie *fi. fa.*levied on property, and. a claim integppsod, the assignee and not the original plaintiff, is the proper party to a writ of error.

Claim, in Fayette Superior Court. Tried before Judge Hill, March Term, 1853.

A preliminary motion was made to dismiss the writ of error, upon the ground, that no notice of the certifying and filing the bill of exceptions, had been given to the defendant in error.

*90The facts were, that *a, fi. fa.,*issued in favor of Thomas- Mi. Jones, against John T. Davis, had been transferred, in writing; by Jones, to William J. Russel. *The fi. fa.*was then levied upon a lot of land in Fayette county, as the property of Davis, which was claimed by Usebius Slayton. The Jury found the property subject to the *fi. fa.*Slayton, the claimant, filed his bill of exceptions, and- served Thomas M. J ones with a notice of the signing and filing the same, but did not serve Wm; J. Russell.

Slayton, in his claim affidavit, describes the *fi. fa.*as one “ in favor of Thomas M. Jones *vs.*John T. Davis and John W. Davis, and now (at the time of .the making of the affidavit,) controlled by Wm. J.. Russell, assignee”.

Tidwell & Fuller, for the motion..

Hines, *contra.*

*By the Court.*

Bennins, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.]
      *“*It shall and may be lawful for the plaintiff in any judgment or execution, to sell or transfer the same, by written assignment or control, and said sale or assignment shall not be considered a discharge or satisfaction of said execution; but the assignee may proceed to- collect the same, for his own use, in as full and ample a manner as the plaintiff could have done, if no such transfer or assignment had been made”.— This is the first section of the Act of 1829, to sitithorize the assignment of judgments and executions. *(Pr. Dig.*464.)

Under this Law, Russell, by the assignment, stepped into the place of’ the assignor, Jones; and Jones became disconnected with the *fi. fa.*

Slayton, when he entered his claim, knew of this assignment.

Russell, therefore, was clearly the plaintiff in the claim case; and for that reason, he, instead of Jones,, should have been served with the notice.

*91No notice of any sort having been served on him, it is obvious that the motion must be sustained, and .the case be dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

April 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan       
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD BELL.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Executive
Chairman of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant.



Date:  May 13, 2005                              By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Document

Exhibit 10.4




April 1, 2020


John (Hans) Quitmeyer


Dear Hans,


This letter will confirm your temporary role of Special Counsel at AdvanSix Inc. (the “Company”), located in Parsippany, New Jersey, which is effective on April 2, coincident with your retirement as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.  The scope of work in the Special Counsel role will be focused on business continuity planning, strategic counsel, and transition of your previous responsibilities.


OFFER DETAILS


Hours of Work
Your hours of work will be approximately 20 hours per week.  The hours may fluctuate depending on the needs of the organization and the length of the engagement will be mutually agreed.  


Compensation
Your annual base salary will be $272,750.00. Given this role is intended to be a short-term arrangement, there will be no annual performance reviews nor will you be eligible for merit increases or participation in the short-term and long-term incentive programs.  


Executive Officer Status
Effective upon your retirement as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, you will no longer be an executive officer of the Company, but you will remain subject to the pre-clearance requirements of the Company’s insider trading policy.


Benefits
You will remain eligible for continuation of employee benefits under the specific terms of those benefit plans, except that you will no longer be eligible for any severance benefits. 


All businesses experience changing conditions. We reserve the right to change work assignments, reporting relationships and staffing levels to meet business needs, and your employment is on an "at will" basis. This means that there is no guarantee of employment for any specific period, and either you or AdvanSix may terminate your employment at any time.




1






Acceptance of Offer


Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing this letter in the space provided and returning it to Stephanie King at stephanie.king@advansix.com.  


If you have any questions or need any further information about our offer, please contact me directly. 




Congratulations, 


/s/ Erin N. Kane
Erin N. Kane, CEO,
AdvanSix Inc.




Copy to:  Stephanie King and Achilles Kintiroglou  




Read and Accepted: 


/s/ Hans Quitmeyer                                                                           
Hans Quitmeyer                                                                                           


Date:  April 1, 2020
2
****IMPLEMENTATION of theRECOMMENDATIONS****
****of the Presidential Commission onthe Space Shuttle Challenger Accident****

 

**[**v**] **Contents****
** **

Preface

ExecutiveSummary

 

Part 1

> - Implementation of the Presidential   Commission Recommendations:    Recommendation   I
  : Solid Rocket Motor   Design.
  - Recommendations II and   V : Shuttle Management Structure and   Improved Communications.      Recommendation   III
    : Criticality Review and Hazard   Analysis.
    - Recommendation   IV : Safety Organization.        Recommendation   VI
      : Landing Safety.
      - Recommendation   VII : Launch Abort and Crew   Escape.          Recommendation   VIII
        : Flight Rate.
        - Recommendation   IX : Maintenance Safeguards.

 

Part 2

> - Related   Return-To-Flight Actions; Abbreviations and   Acronyms . 

 

Appendixes

Appendix         A

National Research Council Members and         Summary of Responsibilities for the Solid Rocket Motor         Redesign Committee.

Appendix         B

Solid Rocket Motor NASA/Industry         Overview Committee Members and Summary of         Responsibilities

Appendix         C

Strategy for Safely Returning the         Space Shuttle to Flight Status

Appendix         D

Organization and Operation of the         NSTS Program

Appendix         E

NASA Management Instruction on Space         Flight Safety Panel

Appendix         F

National Research Council Members and         Summary of Responsibilities for the Criticality Review         and****Hazard Analysis Audit Committee.

Appendix         G

NASA Management Instruction on Roles         and Responsibilities of the Office of Associate         Administrator for Safety, Reliability, Maintainability, and         Quality Assurance

Appendix         H

Actions to Implement the         Recommendations of the Presidential Commission on the Space         Shuttle *Challenger* Accident (July 14,         1986.

******- Volume 5 | General Index -******
No. 87-6324.

#### Harry *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65474-65475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26822]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-6-000]


American Midstream (Alabama Intrastate), LLC; Notice of 
Compliance Filing

October 18, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 15, 2010, American Midstream (Alabama 
Intrastate), LLC pursuant to an October 7, 2010, Letter Order issued in 
Docket Nos. PR10-24-000 and PR10-24-001 which required American 
Midstream (Alabama Intrastate), LLC to file a revised Statement of 
Operating Conditions.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the

[[Page 65475]]

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. 
Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date 
as indicated below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve 
a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention 
or protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43050611000c2d2f2a2d26103633332c313703252631206d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, October 25, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26822 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
10.1





	



U.S. Small Business Administration Note by OneUp Innovations, Inc. in favor of Ameris Bank.


 


Please refer to the accompanying Exhibit 10.1. It is saved in PDF format.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avenue Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his/her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ronald L. Samuels
Ronald L. Samuels Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2015/s/ Barbara J. Zipperian
Barbara J. Zipperian Chief Financial Officer
March 27, 2015
##### 



Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Form 10-Q EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Ronald E. Hermance, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hudson City Bancorp,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986);c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 5, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
 Page 38
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 154 

Of inquiry requesting the President of the United States and directing the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services to transmit certain information 

to the House of Representatives relating to plans to repeal or replace 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the health-related 

measures of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2017 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. 

SARBANES, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President of the United States 

and directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to transmit certain information to the House of 

Representatives relating to plans to repeal or replace 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the 

health-related measures of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States is 

2 requested and the Secretary of the Department of Health 

3 and Human Services is directed to transmit to the House 

4 of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 154 IH 

1 of the adoption of this resolution, all documents, memo2 randa, and advisory legal opinions, including notes from 

3 meetings, memos, and telephone and electronic mail 

4 records, relating to plans to repeal or replace the Patient 

5 Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111– 

6 148) and the health-related measures of the Health Care 

7 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

8 111–152). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 08 55

_____________________________
E NRIQUE D IAZ , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. J. Lee Marsh , Judge

. June 5, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

K ELSEY , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Enrique Diaz, pro se, Appellant.

Rana M. Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark J. Hiers, Deputy General Counsel
, Florida Commission on Offen der Review, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.