alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26447]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice 
that on August 25, 2010, ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, 238 South Main 
Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by renewal to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an 
importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the controlled substance to manufacture 
amphetamine.
    Any bulk manufacturers who are presently, or are applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than November 19, 2010.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 301.34(b), (c), (d), 
(e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal 
Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all applicants for 
registration to import a basic class of any controlled substances in 
schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such 
registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 
1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-26447 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Jason Washington, Appellant

No. 06-12-00162-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court of 

Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 114-

0773-12). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the 

$300.00 assessment of attorney’s fees, leaving $354.00 as the total amount of court costs to be 

imposed. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Jason Washington, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 8, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 10.2
 
    
    
    The Bank hereby waives compliance with financial covenants contained in Section 6.03 of
the Agreement. Such waiver is effective from and including Janaury 2, 2008 through all
covenant testing dates prior to and including December 31, 2008.
 
    
    Section 6.03Specific Financial Covenants of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety effective January 1, 2009.
 
    
    The applicable definition set forth in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is hereby deleted
and replaced with the following:
 Borrowing Base plus minus
 
    
    Section 3.02 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following:
 Term of Revolving Credit Facility
    
   Signed:
    
    /s/ Robert Witterschein
    
    Dated:
    
    2/9/09Print Name:
    
    Robert Witterschein
    
    Title:
    
    President
Order entered July 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-00841-CV

IN RE CHELSEA DAVIS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19281



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE
647 A.2d 472

#### IN THE MATTER OF CECELIA F. COOK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 30, 1994.

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that CECELIA F. COOK of VAUXHALL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from practice on April 17, 1991, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CECELIA F. COOK show cause before this Court on October 24,1994, at 2:00 p.m., in the Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his desig-nee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent file an original and eight copies of her brief with the Clerk of the Court, and serve two copies of the brief on the Office of Attorney Ethics, on or before October 11, *391994, and the Office of Attorney Ethics serve and file a responding brief, if any, on or before October 18, 1994; and it is further

ORDERED that this Order be published in two successive issues of the *New Jersey Law Journal*and the *New Jersey Lawyer,*and the Office of Attorney Ethics cause this Order to be published oh two successive days in a newspaper of general circulation in Union County.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

Name: Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory 
Committee (<greek-i>66).

Date/Time: November 3, 2010 2 p.m.-4 p.m.
    November 4, 2010 8 a.m.-6 p.m.
    November 5, 2010 8 a.m.-3 p.m.

Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230:
    November 5, Room 1005.
    November 6, Room 1235.
    November 7, Room 1235.

Type of Meeting: Open.

Contact Person for More Information: Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior 
Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 
Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8807.

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations concerning 
NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for 
Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

Agenda: Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate (11/3).
    Update on current status of Directorate.
    Reports from liaisons with other Advisory Committees.
    Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate.
    Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Areas.

Summary Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.

     Dated: October 7, 2010.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25685 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with  the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  C.E.  Rick
Strattan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that: (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13

(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ C.E. RICK STRATTAN
___________________________________
C.E. Rick Strattan
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

**AWARENESS LETTER**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

 

We are aware that our report dated August 27, 2004 on our review of the interim consolidatedfinancial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of February 29, 2004, and for the six month periods ended February 29, 2004 and February 28, 2003 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2004 is incorporated by referencesin the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-72756. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning ofSections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

 

/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.

 

Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C. 

Houston, TX 

August 27, 2004
# Sitemap

## May 15, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 05
- May 15, 2014

            - Expedition 39 Landing
            - Soyuz TMA-11M Just After Separation
            - Soyuz TMA-11M Just After Separation
            - Flight Directors Dina Contella and Tomas Gonzalez-Torres
            - Norm Knight, Chief of the Flight Director Office
            - Flight Director Dina Contella and CAPCOM Christie Bertels
            - CAPCOM Christie Bertels
            - NASA Moving Forward on Test Stand Upgrades for SLS Core Stage Testing
            - Arc Test of IsoQ model
            - NASA’s Newest Wind Watcher Arrives at Launch Site
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0419 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE SPANGLER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 29, 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2024

06/20/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0419
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE JOHNSTON.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## March 23, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 03
- March 23, 2010

            - NASA Schedules News Conference about Next Space Shuttle Launch
            - Researcher Maintaining Differential Absorption CO Measurement Instrument
            - Gravimeter Installed in DC-8 Cabin
            - DACOM Mounted in DC-8 for Operation IceBridge 2009
            - Tracking Antarctica’s Sea Ice, Glaciers, and Ice Sheets
            - Researcher Adjusts DACOM on DC-8
            - Researcher Adjusts DACOM for Operation IceBridge 2009
            - Manny Antimisiaris Directs Flight Path for Operation IceBridge 2010
            - A Burst of Spring
            - Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor Installed in DC-8
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE MAYER.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OCTAVIO OSORIO QUINTANA.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Time and Date:

February 10, 2010—10 a.m.

# Place:

800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# Status:

The meeting will be in Open Session.

# Matters to be Considered:

 

## Open Session

                    1. Docket No. 06-01: Worldwide Relocations, Inc.;                     *et al.,*                    —Possible Violations of Sections 8, 10, and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21, and 520.3—Request for Extension of Time.                

                    2. Docket No. 08-04:                     *Tienshan, Inc.*                     v.                     *Tianjin Hua Feng Transport Agency Co., Ltd*                    —Request for Extension of Time.                

3. FY 2010 Budget Status Update.

4. Petition P1-08—Petition of the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America, Inc. for Exemption from Mandatory Rate Tariff Publication.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-2616 Filed 2-4-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
#### WILLIE SPINKS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

January 21, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148286

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148286

COA: 306372

Wayne CC: 11-002103-FC

CHRYSTAL LYNN-GUARDALUPE POPE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2022

ROBERT MATERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHERYNE E. STOKES, Area Director, EEOC

Norfolk Area Office; BOB SIEZER, EEO Coordinator, Commonwealth of Virginia/Corrections

Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-985)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Materson, Appellant Pro Se. Lamont Navarro White, UNITED

STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C.;

Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Materson v.

Stokes, No. CA-95-985 (E.D. Va. June 22, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ANTONIO DI MAIO, PROSECUTOR, v. ARTHUR REID, RECORDER, AND RECORDER’S COURT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MT. OLIVE, NEW JESEY, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 2, 1944

Decided June 12, 1944.

Before Justices Case, Bobine and Postee.

Por the prosecutor, *Edward M. Malone.*

Por the respondents, *William A. Hegarty.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Poetbr, J.

The prosecutor was arrested about midnight September 20th, 1943, by two police officers of the Township of Mt. Olive and charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of *B. 8.*39 :4-50. He was taken to police headquarters. The recorder prepared a complaint and warrant charging a violation of the statute *supra.*He immediately tried prosecutor, found him guilty and sentenced him to a fine of $200 and costs, in default of payment that he be committed to the county jail for thirty *18days, and revoked his license to drive for two years. Prosecutor was unable to pay the fine and was committed to the Morris County jail at 1:30 A. m.

This conviction is challenged on this writ of *certiorari*on the ground that the prosecutor was not given a fair trial and was convicted while not in a condition to comprehend or intelligently meet the charge. In *Twining*v. *New Jersey,*211 *U. S.*78; 53 *L. Ed.*97, it was held that the essential elements of due process of law are notice, an opportunity to be heard and to defend in an orderly proceeding adapted to the nature of the case. *Test*v. *Test,*131 *N. J. Eq.*197. The Court of Errors and Appeals held in *Johnson*v. *City of Wild-wood,*116 *N. J. L.*462 (at *p.*464), “A fair trial is a legal trial; one conducted according to rules of common law except in so far as it has been changed by statute; one where the accused legal rights are safeguarded and respected.” If this man was intoxicated, as it seems he was, he certainly was in no condition to be called upon to plead to this charge nor to have the judgment or understanding sufficient to protect his interests at a trial where he was under charges. There was no necessity for the unseemly haste, as was here exhibited. It seems clear to us that the prosecutor was denied his right to an orderly proceeding. He was denied due process of law. *Cf. Kruttschnitt*v. *Hagaman,*128 *Id.*246; *Joerg*v. *Alberts,*129 *Id.*287.

The conviction is reversed.
585 A.2d 338

#### MARK KANNRY v. ENID KANNRY.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50082 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ALVAREZ-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2067-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan AlvarezCastro raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HOWARD J. GOLDBERG.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,341,969
<SECURITIES>                                   552,301
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,512,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,845,034
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,561,876
<PP&E>                                      10,031,719<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,593,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,019,745
<BONDS>                                     17,597,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,287
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,933,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,593,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,403,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,276,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,465,546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,072,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,411,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,411,049)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
<FN>
<F1>PP&E DOES NOT APPLY FIGURE REPRESENTS OTHER ASSETS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARL L. JOHNSON.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 351

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JACOB WALL.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.