alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 7, 2009
    /s/ Don M. BaileyDon M. BaileyChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NIAAA Member Conflict 
Applications--Biosciences.
    Date: October 28, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ranga Srinivas, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project 
Review Branch, EPRB, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 
2085, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f7c7d666166796e7d4f626e66632161666721686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cab9b8a3a4a3bcabb88aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: October 7, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26034 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### GLADYS SNOW v. CITY OF NEWARK.

May 4, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0414

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW JAMES McCURDY, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 11, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 1 2023

09/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0414
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26742]



[[Page 65511]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Beijing 
Aerospace Measurement & Control Corp., Beijing, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 
CHINA; VTI Instruments, Irvine, CA; and Crystek Corporation, Fort 
Myers, FL, have been added as parties to this venture.
    In addition, AIM-USA, LLC has changed its name to Avionics 
Interface Technologies, LLC, Omaha, NE.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 8, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 18, 2010 (75 FR 51115).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-26742 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65404-65405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26556]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Scientific Merit 
Review Board; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a teleconference 
meeting of the Spinal Cord Injury & Regenerative Medicine Subcommittee 
of the Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Scientific Merit 
Review Board will be held November 4, 2010, in Room 933 at the 
Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 I Street, NW., Washington, DC, at 2 p.m. 
The meeting will be closed to the public for the discussion, 
examination, reference to,

[[Page 65405]]

and oral review of the research proposals and critiques.
    The purpose of the Board is to review rehabilitation research and 
development applications and advise the Director, Rehabilitation 
Research and Development Service, and the Chief Research and 
Development Officer on the scientific and technical merit, the mission 
relevance, and the protection of human and animal subjects.
    During the meeting, discussion and recommendations will include 
qualifications of the personnel conducting the studies (the disclosure 
of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy), as well as research information (the premature disclosure of 
which would likely compromise significantly the implementation of 
proposed agency action regarding such research projects). As provided 
by subsection 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended by Public Law 94-
409, closing the meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 
(9)(B).
    For further information, please contact Tiffany Asqueri, Designated 
Federal Officer, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20420, at (202) 461-1740 or [email protected].

    Dated: October 18, 2010.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26556 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

s1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

146875

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146875

COA: 306965

Wayne CC: 11

- 005613

- FH

ANTHONY GERALD LAGINESS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 33.16
















REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year ending December
31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered
by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer









Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
January 23, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1009 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1009

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 25, 2018.
Whereas the ability of the United States Special Operations Command to 
        successfully conduct operations relies on adequate resourcing;
Whereas Special Operations Forces must prepare for a wide array of missions to 
        support and defend the United States in various capacities around the 
        world;
Whereas the training and development of Special Operations Forces takes multiple 
        years and cannot be created overnight;
Whereas the success of the United States Special Operations Command requires 
        close coordination between each branch of the Armed Forces;
Whereas training shortfalls have been identified as posing an unnecessary risk 
        to Special Forces soldiers;
Whereas the lack of full, on-time funding undermines the ability of the United 
        States Special Operations Command to work by, with, and through our 
        partner nations;
Whereas the smaller operating footprint of Special Operations Forces poses 
        unique operational needs not found in conventional forces;
Whereas the deployment cycle of Special Operations Forces requires additional 
        attention and resources be provided for family and support programs 
        before, during, and after deployments; and
Whereas the United States Special Operations Command must maintain a constant 
        level of readiness that is significantly undermined by budget 
        uncertainty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) finds that not providing the Department of Defense with stable, 
        predictable, and on-time funding unnecessarily jeopardizes the safety 
        and security of the United States;
            (2) expresses a sense of gratitude for the incredible sacrifices 
        made by both Special Operators and their families; and
            (3) commits to meeting the needs of the United States Special 
        Operations Command as part of its efforts to restore military readiness.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### JOSEPH F. DODD v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## May 14, 1999

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1999
- 05
- May 14, 1999

            - Significant Event Report for Week Ending 5/14/1999
August 21, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FERNANDO TAVERA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00493

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________ ________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant p ay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT J. VELARD.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001035507
<NAME>                        800-JR CIGAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        9,107
<SECURITIES>                  6,568
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,436
<ALLOWANCES>                  87
<INVENTORY>                   40,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              64,768
<PP&E>                        42,225
<DEPRECIATION>                7,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                101,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         22,195
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      128
<OTHER-SE>                    79,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  101,501
<SALES>                       317,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              317,001
<CGS>                         261,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 35,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            (771)
<INCOME-PRETAX>               19,862
<INCOME-TAX>                  7,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           11,881
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  11,881
<EPS-BASIC>                   .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .96


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.135
                                   DEMAND NOTE

$250,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                                   April 1, 1999

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Fifty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($250,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest of 8.5%
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.


                                           Wilshire Technologies, Inc.

                                           By: /s/ Kathleen E. Terry  
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Name: Kathleen E. Terry
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
### 62

OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

Honorabls C. 1c.

kns, Prssldsnt ._ Southwrst **Tsxas** Stat. Tsashsrs Collags San Xareos, Texas Dear Sir:

this automob ssnss? Mu8

same general laws?* on's Annotate6Texas Statutes, 

## or the ?srlous institutions sst Texas Stats TsaohsrsCol-

. . . . Thsrr is PO basis for assuaing that in lsaring ths oontrol of the88 funds solrlywithin ths hands of the **board** that the Lsgislaturo lntondsdthat ssld funds should boeoas any lsss stat0 IBOLOII*J~~ In **hot,** Ssotlon b of ths suw Artiols rrqulrss **that** sspamts l ooounts shallbr **krpt** at ths institution *showing ths sour018 of all sume oollsotsd,and ths purposes for whloh srpendsd* while Ssotlon 4 of ths Artlols provides for a biennialprinting of a report showlq

I. C”**I”“.” 1..

### -- 63

HonorableC. X. Evans, **Pagi** E

the rsoeipts and dfsbursementsof all funds handled by the instltutlon. Finally, in Seotion 8a, the Article says that: "* * * this law shall be subordinateand sub~servlent

to ths biennialappropriationbills for the support of the several institutions heroinm8ntfOneda" To assume, as we do, that such funds are and renaln state moneys is to say that any property or equipment purohasodwith suoh funds becomes the property or equipment of the state and is eubjeot to all rules ,andregulations whloh the Legislaturemay have prescrlbad**ior** suoh property or equipment.

You **are** respeottully advised, therefore,that it 1s the opinion of this department,that the automobilewhloh you deacrlbsdas purchased from studant fees ior the purpoea or transportingathletic teams is a state owned vehlole in the legal sense of the word, murt be Operatedaccording to the rules and regulation8whloh the Legislatureha8 prescribed for the operation of state owned vehioles,and must be marked in acoordanoewith Article 881 of the Texas Penal Code, Vernonvs **Annotated** Criminal Statutes.

BY %rv?ohU As&tar&