alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL 

,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0134 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

C.H., ORDER 

A Youth in Need of Care. 

Appellant C.H., birthmother of the youth at issue, appeals the February 5, 2024 

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, 

Yellowstone County, that terminated her parental rights to C.H. in that court's Cause No. 

DN 18-292. 

The State has filed a Notice of Concession. Although it maintains it does not agree 

with all the arguments the birthmother advanced in her Opening Brief, it concedes the 

District Court erred in terminating parental rights without the required testimony from a 

qualified Indian Child Welfare Act expert witness (ICWA QEW) as was required for 

C.H.'s case. The State asks this Court to reverse the February 5, 2024 order terminating 

the birthmother's parental rights and remand this case to the District Court for further 

proceedings. 

Having considered the Appellant's Opening Brief and the State's Notice of 

Concession, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the February 5, 2024 Findings of Fact, Conclusions 

of Law, and Order is REVERSED. This matter is remanded to the District Court for further 

proceedings. 

DATED this day of August, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

08/06/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0134
ELED 

AUG - 6 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of diAonterel 

2 

(al 

Justices
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV,
L.P. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal Executive
Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                          |                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | By                                                                                                       | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz
| |                                                                                                         
| | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp.(CCC)
Principal Executive Officer of CCC
**Exhibit 31.****2**

 

 

 

**Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Bryan J. Merryman, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.; and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

 

 

 

| Date: June 29, 2020 |   | /s/ Bryan J. Merryman                                                                                                                      |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Bryan J. Merryman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and

Director *(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)* |
# Mississippi Valley Division announces conclusion of hurricane preparedness efforts

**VICKSBURG, Miss. -- **
Today marks the last official day of the 2023 hurricane season, which runs each year from June 1 through Nov. 30. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicted an above-average season with a forecast of 14 to 21 named storms. There were no named storms impacting the MVD region.

As the 2023 hurricane season officially comes to an end, we reflect on the dedication and collaborative efforts that have fortified our communities against potential threats.

Mississippi Valley Division with lessons learned was ready to work closely throughout the 2023 hurricane season with its staff, and local, state and federal partners to respond to potential threats and impacts that could have affected our area of responsibility as safely and timely as possible.

Every year, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, part of the federal government’s unified national response to disasters and emergencies, sends hundreds of people to respond to disasters around the world. Here at home, USACE assists the Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency as the primary agency for public works and engineering-related emergency support. FEMA assigns USACE missions to include: debris management, temporary housing, temporary roofing, emergency power, infrastructure assessment, and support to urban search and rescue.

As we transition out of this hurricane season, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers extends its gratitude to the communities, partners, and dedicated personnel who contributed to the success of our preparedness efforts. While we celebrate the conclusion of the season, our commitment to building a more resilient and secure future remains unwavering.

 

-30-

Release no. 23-007
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J U A N A N TO N I O LLA M A S REY ES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70365 A ge nc yN o. A 037- 516- 672 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Juan A nt oni o L l a m a s R e y e s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s r e m o v a l o r d e ra n dd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e m an d . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED JU N 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70365 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e m an d , R om er o-R uiz v . Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d1 0 5 7 , 1 0 6 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F . 3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g L la m a s R e y e s ’ m o tio n to r e m an d , b e c au s e th e B I A c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e h e s ub m itte da n da c te dw ith in its br oa d di s c r e t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng tha tthe e vi de nc e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o w arr ant r e m an d . Se e S i n gh v . I

NS , 29 5 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( T he B IA ’ s deni al o f am o tio n to r e o p e n s h a ll b e r e v e r s e dif it is “a rb itr ary , irr a tio n a l, o rc o n tr aryto l aw . ”) . W e r e j e c tL l a m a s R e y e s ’ due pr oc e s s c l a i m be c aus e the B I A ’ s de c i s i on e x p la in e dits a n a ly s is o f th e e v id e n c e L la m a s R e y e s s ub m itte dw ith th e m o tio n to re m and, and ref

l ec t s thatthe B IA prop er l y c on si dere d the i ss ues r ai se d b y L l am as R e y e s ’ m o tio n . Se e L o

p ezv . A s h c r o

ft , 366 F . 3d 799, 807 n. 6 ( 9th C i r . 2004) (“ [T ] he [B IA ] do es no thave t o w ri t e an exegesi s on everycont ent i on . ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of employees from the Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On October 6, 2010, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked in any area of the Department of Energy facility at the Ames Laboratory from January 1, 1955 through December 31, 1960, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                    This designation will become effective November 5, 2010, unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-26557 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC FLORES,

Appellant,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00177-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01621)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eric Flores is attempting to appeal from a letter signed by the 120th District Court on 

June 6, 2019 advising him that his conviction is final and “all Appellate relief must be pursued by 

the proper vehicle.” We dismiss the attempted appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The Texas Constitution provides that a court of appeals has jurisdiction over “all cases of 

which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such 

restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law.” TEX.CONST. art. V, § 6(a). Article 

44.02 provides that “[a] defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules 

hereinafter prescribed . . . .” TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.02. Under Rule 25.2(a)(2), a 

defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 

44.02 and the Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2). Generally, a court of 

appeals only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a 
- 2 -

final judgment of conviction. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); 

see State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)(noting the well-established 

rule that a defendant’s general right to appeal under Article 44.02 is limited to appeal from a final 

judgment). We have jurisdiction over other types of criminal appeals only when “expressly 

granted by law.” McIntosh v. State, 110 S.W.3d 51, 52 (Tex.App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); see 

Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008); Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 794.

On May 18, 2017, we issued an opinion and judgment affirming Appellant’s conviction of 

burglary of a building in cause number 20110D01621. See Eric Flores v. State, No. 08-16-00025-

CR, 2017 WL 2180705 (Tex.App.—El Paso May 18, 2017, pet. ref’d). The trial judge’s letter 

informing that his conviction is final, and she could not give him legal advice or appoint counsel 

to represent him in post-conviction proceedings is not an appealable order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

July 10, 2019

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin Schott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

             (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                      Act of 1934; and

             (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                      presents, in all material respects, the financial
                      condition and results of operations of the
                      Company.

Date:  August 16, 2004                    By:        /s/ KEVIN SCHOTT
       ---------------                       ---------------------------------
                                                      Kevin Schott
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY WILLIAMS.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# 			Research and Technology at Kennedy Space Center		

## 			News & Articles		

See All News

Article3 Min Read
NASA Experiment Sheds Light on Highly Charged Moon Dust

Article5 Min Read
Kennedy Space Center Looks Ahead to a Busy Year in 2024

Article4 Min Read
NASA Facility Builds on Space Station Legacy at Kennedy
Article7 Min Read
NASA Kennedy Space Center’s Top 20 Stories of 2023

## 					Multimedia				

					Go To Galleries				

				Go To Galleries			

## 			Discover More Topics From NASA		

								SCaN News							

								Research Programs							

								Flight Programs							

								Apollo 1 Resources
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 24

- 00077

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellant

v.

ZACHARY DUNCAN JAMES

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 2

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23

- 04744

- CRM

- CCL2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas appealed the trial court's order granting Zachary Duncan

James's moti o n to suppress.

The Sta t e has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, signed by t he State's at torney,

indicating it no longer desires to prosecute the appeal. Rule 42.2(a) o f the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure provides t hat an appellate court may dismiss an appe al uponState v. James Page 2

appellant's motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). Accordi ngly , we grant the State 's motion

to dismiss the appeal, and the appeal is dismissed.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gr ay

, Justice Johnson

, and

Justice Smith

Motion to dismiss granted

Opinion delivered and filed March 28, 2024

Do no t publish

[ C R 25]
1 min read

# Test Technology: Angle Measurement Description

### Lillian Gipson

#### Web Editor

Apr 26, 2016

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

The aerodynamic forces on an aircraft are dependent on the angle of the aircraft with respect to the freestream flow. Slight inaccuracies in pitch or yaw angle may have large effects on the airflow measurements, thus impacting the forces measured on the model. The angle of attack correlates extremely well with many parameters being studied during model tests or real flight, such as lift, drag and flight loads. As with other measurements, angle measurement requires both proper instrumentation and proper technique.

There are two different types of angle measurement devices. Those that measure angle during data collection (“wind-on”) and those that are meant to verify the angle measurement device in between test runs (“wind-off”). Both are important for recording accurate angle measurements.

AETC Test Technology

AETC Ground Facilities

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Explore More

1 min read14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel Data AcquisitionArticle										1 year ago									

1 min read14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel Quick FactsArticle										1 year ago									

1 min read14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel CharacteristicsArticle										1 year ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space
Solar System Exploration
Why Oceans Matter The story of oceans is the story of life. Life as we know it requires three ingredients:…

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - Aerosciences Evaluation Test Capabilities
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUAN

- YI CHEN, AKA Kuanyi Chen, AKA Pangzi Chen,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72031

Agency No. A205

- 346

- 897

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 10, 2018 University of Hawaii Manoa

Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Kuan

- Yi Chen (Chen) , a native and citizen of Taiwan who resides in the

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of a continuance and of administ rative closure. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law de novo and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

FEB 12 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

findings of fact for substantial evidence, Cui v. Mukasey , 538 F.3d 1289, 1290 (9th

Cir. 2008), and we review denial of a continuance for abuse of di scretion, Ahmed

v. Holder , 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

1. The BIA did not err in affirming the IJ’s denial of a continuance to

give Chen more time to file an application for parole through his U.S. citizen

daughte r

. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that any potential

relief was speculative. Chen had previously applied for parole, but he was denied

that relief in 2012 after failing to respond to a request that he submit proof of his

marriage and proof of legal presence in CNMI. Given this and Chen’s conviction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and (B)(i) for harboring aliens for financial

gain, the BIA did not err in concluding it was unlikely Chen would be eligible for a

favorable exercise of discretion, and thus had not shown “good cause” to warrant a

continuance. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 ; see An Na Peng v. Holder , 673 F.3d 1248, 125 3

(9th Cir. 2012) (“ The regulations do not define good cause, but the IJ

— and, on

appeal, the BIA

— should consider fact ors including (1) the nature of the evidence

excluded as a result of the denial of the continuance, (2) the reasonableness of the

immigrant’s conduct, (3) the inconvenience to the court, and (4) the number of

continuances previously granted. ” (internal quo tation marks and citation omitted) ).

2. The BIA did not err in denying Chen administrative closure to allow

him to apply for parole

. Gonzalez

- Caraveo v. Sessions , 882 F.3d 885, 890

- 91 (9th3

Cir. 2018). T here was substantial evidence that relief was speculative because of

Chen’s previous denial of parole, his conviction for harboring aliens for financial

gain, and the lack of a ny pending application for parole or other relief

.

PETITION DENIED.
---

## Ulrich Lotzmann

I have had a fascination for astronomy and space exploration since my
childhood in the good old Apollo days. In my spare time I do such
things as painting, high-resolution astrophotography, and work on a
book that will focus on the Apollo 12 mission.

Ulli Lotzmann
The upper photo shows Al Bean (right), Christian, Martina and me on
March 15 2002 in the Bean residence. The lower photo shows one of my
latest paintings, titled 'Meeting Point Surveyor III'. Al's influence
is clearly visible .

December 2002

Editor's note, added 1 September 2008:  The picture below shows the Lotzmanns during an early stage of renovating their new home, the demolition of an interior wall.  (Click on the images for a larger version.)