alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 24 87

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ant on io Aus le r
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
W es Brad fo rd ; CP L. Jam es Co ll in s; Sta te of Ark an sa s; Tim ot hy Bun ch ; Lee Sh ort; Dan(Ch arl es ) Han co ck ; Ro na ldDavi s, J r.; Ho no rab le Jo hn Pu tm an

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Harris on

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Jan ua ry

3, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

10 , 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, MURPHY, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

A n t o n i o A us le r ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s pr es erv ic e di sm is sa l of hi s ci vi l 1 rig ht s act io n, br ou gh t un de r, in te r al ia , 42 U.S.C. § 19 83

. Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed

The Hon or ab le Tim ot hy L. Bro ok s, Uni t e d S t a te s Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s.th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe a l , w e c o n c lu de th at di sm is sa l was

pr op er for the reas on s exp la in ed by th e di st ric t cou rt. See Mo or e v. Sim s, 20 0 F.3d 11 70 , 11 71 (8 t h C i r. 20 00 ) (p er cu ria m ) (2 8 U.S.C. § 19 15 (e)( 2) (B) di sm is sa l

rev ie wed de no vo ). Fu rth er, we fin d th at Aus le r’s arg um en t on ap pe al --t ha t, be cau se he was no t in carc erat ed whe n he fil ed hi s co m pl ai nt , hi s cl ai m s fo r da m ag es were no t ba rredby H eckv. Hu m

ph rey, 51 2 U.S. 47 7, 4 86 -8 7 (1 99 4) --i s p recl ud edby circu it pr eced en t. See Newm

y v. Jo hn so n, 75 8 F.3 d 10 08 , 10 11 -1 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 14 ) (n ot in g t h at Heck ’s fav or ab le -te rm in at io n ru le ap pl ie s whe n § 19 83 pl ai nt iff is no lo n g e r in carc erat ed ). Acco rd in gl y, we de ny Aus le r’s m ot io n fo r or al arg um en t, an d we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1532. MARIO R. SULLIVAN v. THE STATE. 

In 2015, MarioR. Sullivan pleaded guilty to burglary, armed robbery, and other

crimes. In May 2022, he filed a motion in which he essentially sought to quash the

indictment. The trial court denied Sullivan’s motion, and he filed this appeal.

1 We

lack jurisdiction. 

A challenge to the validity of an indictment is a challenge to a criminal

conviction. See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008). 

Our Supreme Court has made clear that a motion seeking to challenge an allegedly

invalid or void judgment of conviction “is not one of the established procedures for

challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case” and that an appeal from the

denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532

(690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (2) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). 

1 We recently dismissed Sullivan’s appeal from the denial of his motion for an

out-of-time appeal. See Case No. A22A0622 (May 23, 2022). 

June 03, 2022
Thus, Sullivan is not authorized to collaterally attack his conviction in this manner,

and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/03/2022
# Sitemap

## September 1964

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1964
- September 1964

            - 10
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Chelsea Hennessey Gerald Hennessey Malcolm Cisneros Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) I947A
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILSON FLORES.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 15,332.

#### The State, ex rel. Spears, *v.*Tayler, Trustee.

From the Benton Circuit Court.

Filed March 13, 1890.

*D. Fraser*and *W. Isham,*for appellant.

*U. Z. Wiley,*for appellee.

Elliott, X-

Reversed upon the authority of *State, ex rel.,*v. *Haworth, ante,*p. 462.

Berkshire, J.,

dissents, for the reasons given in *Slate, ex rel.,*v. *Haworth, supra.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ADRIAN DIECKMAN, on behalf of §

himself and all others similarly §

situated, § No. 92, 2021

§

Plaintiff Below , Appellant, § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 11130

REGENCY GP LP, REGENCY GP §

LLC, ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, §

L.P., ENERGY TRANSFER §

PARTNERS , L.P., ENGERY §

TRANSFER PARTNERS GP, L.P., §

MICHAEL J. BRADLEY, JAMES W. §

BYRANT, RODNEY L. GRAY, JOHN §

W. McREYNOLDS, MATTHEW S. §

RAMSEY and RICHARD BRANNON, §

§

Defendants Below, Appellees. §

Submitted: October 20, 2021

Decided: November 3, 2021

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, TRAYNOR and

MONTGOMERY

- REEVES , Justices, constituting the Court en Banc

.

O R D E R

Now this 3rd day of November, 2021 having considered this matter on the briefs

and oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery

in its Memorandum Opinion dated February 15, 2021, and Order Granting in Part and

Denying in Part Defendants Motion to Dismiss dated February 20, 2018 as clarified by

Order dated September 19, 2019;NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decis ions of the Court of Chancery

be and the same hereby are, AFF IR MED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### OCEAN PINES, LTD. v. W. CARY EDWARDS, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 213 *N.J.Super.*351)
Exhibit 99.1

PDS GAMING CORPORATION  ANNOUNCES DISMISSAL OF SHAREHOLDER COMPLAINT

LAS
VEGAS, NVApril 25, 2003PDS Gaming Corporation (NasdaqSC: PDSG) today announced the dismissal of a purported class action lawsuit filed by a shareholder in District
Court, Clark County, Nevada. The complaint was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff in response to the Company's motion to dismiss. The Company had announced the filing of the complaint in its press
release dated March 7, 2003. The complaint alleged that the members of the Company's Board of Directors violated their fiduciary duties in approving a letter of intent with respect to a
proposal submitted by a management group to acquire shares of common stock of the Company as announced in the Company's press releases dated February 24, 2003 and February 26, 2003.

A
special committee of the Company's Board of Directors, consisting of its independent directors, and the management group continue to negotiate towards a definitive agreement. The proposal is subject
to, among other things, the execution of a definitive agreement, approval by a committee of the Company's independent directors and by a majority of the Company's shares not owned by the management
group, the procuring of all necessary consents of the Company's commercial lenders and the trustees under the indentures covering the Company's outstanding debt securities, the securing of required
approvals from all gaming regulatory agencies, the obtaining of the necessary financing, and the receipt by the Company of a favorable fairness opinion from an investment bank.

For
additional information, please contact:

Peter
D. Cleary
President and Chief Operating Officer
PDS Gaming Corporation
6171 McLeod Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89120
(702) 736-0700

---

QuickLinks
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in 

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the 

citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Filing Date: June 17, 2024

No. S-1-SC-35695

ROBERT M. BOUGHTON and LOUIS

A. HILLE,

Petitioners-Appellants,

v.

SUNPORT PLAZA APARTMENTS/SHC-NM,

Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

Carl J. Butkus, District Judge

Robert M. Boughton

Louis A. Hille

Pro se

Albuquerque, NM 

for Appellants

Ronald A. Tucker, LLC

Ronald A. Tucker

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL

PER CURIAM.

{1} WHEREAS, on February 15, 2016, the Court accepted certification and held this 

matter in abeyance pending this Court’s disposition in Padilla v. Torres, S-1-SC-35619;
{2} WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Padilla on February 5, 2024, 

reversing and remanding that matter to the metropolitan court for a new trial, see Padilla 

v. Torres, 2024-NMSC-007, ¶ 2, ___ P.3d ___;

{3} WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issues presented in this matter are 

addressed by the Court’s opinion in Padilla;

{4} WHEREAS, the Court, therefore, exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B) 

NMRA to dispose of this matter by nonprecedential order; and

{5} WHEREAS, the Court having considered the foregoing and being sufficiently 

advised;

{6} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s February 15, 2016, order 

is WITHDRAWN as to the abeyance; and

{7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court is reversed and this matter is 

remanded to the metropolitan court for a new trial in accordance with Padilla.

{8} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR:

DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice
# Sitemap

## July 22, 2020

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2020
- 07
- July 22, 2020

            - NASA Juno Takes First Images of Jovian Moon Ganymede’s North Pole
            - Spacewalker Chris Cassidy works on the Tranquility module
            - Comet NEOWISE Streaks Across the Sky Above Lone Pine Lake
            - Expedition 63 Commander Chris Cassidy shows off a spacesuit helmet
            - NASA astronaut Chris Cassidy works during a six-hour spacewalk
            - Expedition 63 Commander Chris Cassidy took this epic “space-selfie”
            - The sun beams during a spacewalk
            - The sun beams during a spacewalk
            - Spacewalker Chris Cassidy works on the Tranquility module
            - Spacewalker Chris Cassidy works on the Tranquility module
No. 13,865.

#### Cassell *v.*Cunningham.

Filed Jan. 14, 1890.

*Evidence.*— Conflict.—Finding.—Supreme *Court.*— Where there is a conflict of evidence upon a question of fact the finding of the trial court will not he disturbed.

From the Knox Circuit Court.

— *Weems,*— *Wetzel*and *S. Williams,*for appellant.

*J. S. Pritchett, W. A. Cullop*and *G. W. Shaw,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

— In the trial court there was a dispute as to whether the complaint was changed before filing or after issue joined, and upon this question of fact affidavits were submitted and the court decided in favor of the appellee. It is well settled that where there is a conflict of evidence upon a question of fact the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed. If there had been no dispute there could be no reversal, for the change was not of such a material character as to justify us in holding that the trial court abused its discretion.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.
# Sitemap

## August 07, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 08
- August 07, 2014

            - Television Coverage Set for Final European Space Station Cargo Ship Docking
            - NASA Selects Proposals for Advanced Energy Storage Systems
            - Hurricanes Iselle and Julio Nearing the Hawaiian Islands
            - NASA Glenn Realigns Operating Structure to Support Future Growth
            - Helios
            - NASA, Navy Prepare for Orion Spacecraft to Make a Splash
            - NEOWISE Spies Comet C/2013 A1 Siding Spring a Second Time
The Corps Environment February 2020  
  This edition highlights partnership and collaboration, in support of Environmental Operating Principle #6. Content includes commentary from Ms. Stacey Brown, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Planning and Policy Division Chief, and highlights a variety of projects and initiatives across the enterprise.
  
 The Corps Environment
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VERNON SIMMONS.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# SUMMARY:

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.

                        Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification, Comments should be sent via e-mail to                         *Ross_A._Rutledge@omb.eop.gov*                         or fax to 202-395-3086. Copies of submission may be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*OMB Number:*                     OMB 0412-New.                

*Form Number:*                     AID 321-1.                

*Title:*                     Mentor Protégé Program—Agreement Application.                

*Type of Submission:*                     New information collection.                

*Purpose:*                     Entities interested in participating in the U.S. Agency for International Developments (USAID) Mentor-Protégé Program must apply in writing to the USAID Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) by submitting the application form. The application will contain the Mentor-Protégé Program Agreement and will be evaluated for approval. Evaluations will consider the nature and extent of technical and managerial support as well as any proposed financial assistance in the form of equity investment, loans, joint venture, and traditional subcontracting support. USAID's current policy on the Mentor-Protégé Program can be found in the AIDAR 719.273.                

*Annual Reporting Burden:*

*Respondents:*                     30.                

*Total annual responses:*                     30.                

*Total annual hours requested:*                     360 hours.                

Dated: October 8, 2010.

Beth Salamanca, 

Acting Director, Office of Management Services, Bureau for Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-26413 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
August 28, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SHAVONNE LEON, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00295-CV V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 8, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Shavonne Leon.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Executive
Chairman of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  May 15, 2007                         By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P. (the“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, andJohn Kallas, the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on theirknowledge, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of thePartnership.     August 10, 2007         By                         /s/ Dennis J. Tietz    Dennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive    Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26549]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Notice of a Matter To Be Added to the Agenda for Consideration at an 
Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: 3a. Interim Final Rule--Part 702 of NCUA's 
Rules and Regulations, Prompt Corrective Action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26549 Filed 10-18-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
# Sitemap

## April 01, 1983

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1983
- 04
- April 01, 1983

            - April 1983 – Tracking and Data Relay Satellite 1 (TDRS-1) Launched
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<CIK>     0000891098
<NAME>     Sterling Bancshares Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         126,534
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             409
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                41,206
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    103,851
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         207,087
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           209,303
<LOANS>                                        869,502
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (8,278)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,400,478
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,219,825
<SHORT-TERM>                                    45,169
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,300
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,750
<PREFERRED>                                        177
<COMMON>                                        24,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,400,478
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 74,178
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,702
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,082
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                94,962
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              28,598
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,825
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           65,137
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,255
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 52,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,654
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,654
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,063
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,502
<LOANS-PAST>                                       505
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   217
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 15,299
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,851
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (3,300)
<RECOVERIES>                                       472
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,278
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,831
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,447<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED FOR MERGER WITH HUMBLE NATIONAL BANK ON JUNE 30, 1998 AND HOMETOWN
BANCSHARES, INC. ON NOVEMBER 20, 1998.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Sitemap

## March 30, 2020

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2020
- 03
- March 30, 2020

            - Small Steps, Giant Leaps: Episode 32, Europa Clipper
            - Rodents and a rocket carried these researchers’ dreams to space
            - NASA astronaut Andrew Morgan works on U.S. spacesuit components
            - Visiting DSN Complexes
            - NASA Selects Mission to Study Causes of Giant Solar Particle Storms
            - What Does the DSN Do?
            - Interplanetary Network Directorate (IND) Commitments Office
            - Where is the DSN Located?
            - Antennas of the Deep Space Network
            - Warped Space-time to Help WFIRST Find Exoplanets
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD PARSONS.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.