alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Blue Roof Program sign-up station opening in Lake Charles

**Lake Charles -- **
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has opened a Blue Roof Sign-Up Center in Lake Charles, Louisiana, at the Lake Charles Civic Center, N. Lakeshore Dr, Lake Charles, LA 70601, open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. The deadline to sign up is Sept. 21, 2020.

To find the location using GPS navigation, use the following coordinates: 30°13'54.6"N 93°13'15.0"W or 30.231830, -93.220826. Enter either set of the previous sets of numbers into your GPS application and the directions to the site should appear.

The program is currently active in Allen, Beauregard, Calcasieu, Cameron, Jefferson Davis, and Vernon parishes. 

Operation Blue Roof is a priority mission managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for FEMA. Operation Blue Roof aims to provide homeowners in disaster areas with fiber-reinforced sheeting to cover their damaged roofs until permanent repairs are made. 

This program is a free service to homeowners. Operation Blue Roof protects property, reduces temporary housing costs, and allows residents to remain in their homes while recovering from the storm. 

This program is for primary residences or a permanently occupied rental property with less than 50 percent structural damage. Vacation rental properties are not eligible for this program. After the blue roof is installed, the structure is declared habitable. Not all roof types qualify for the program. Roofs that are flat or made of metal or clay, slate, or asbestos tile do not qualify. All storm debris must be removed for the roof to qualify.

Residents can also sign up for the program at www.usace.army.mil/BlueRoof. Here, you can sign up for Blue Roof assistance using a Right of Entry (ROE) form, which gathers information about your residence. The ROE is a legal document that allows Corps workers to access your property and assess your home's damage. The ROE also allows contracted crews to work on your roof.

Residents can call toll free 1-888-ROOF-BLU (1-888-766-3258) for more information regarding this program. For more information regarding the recovery effort, please visit the following website:  https://hurricanelaura.la.gov. Again, the deadline to sign up is Sept. 21, 2020 so do not wait to apply for this free assistance.

###

**Contact**

Release no. 20-046

Operation Blue Roof

Blue Roof

FEMA

Hurricane Laura

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has opened a Blue Roof Sign-Up Center in Lake Charles

Louisiana

at the Lake Charles Civic Center

N Lakeshore Dr

Lake Charles

LA 70601

open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. The deadline to sign up is Sept. 21

2020. The program is currently active in Allen

Beauregard

Calcasieu

Cameron

Jefferson Davis

and Vernon parishes and is free to homeowners.
# Sitemap

## February 2001

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2001
- February 2001

            - 02
            - 09
            - 13
            - 14
            - 16
            - 20
            - 21
            - 23
            - 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,270)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,058)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,395)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, William McVicar, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flex Pharma, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





/s/ William McVicarWilliam McVicar, Ph.D.April 16, 2019President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
---

Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual
report on Form 40-F of Trillium Therapeutics Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Niclas Stiernholm, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.

/s/ Niclas
      StiernholmNiclas StiernholmPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 12, 2018


---
Operation Blue Roof sign-up for hurricane damage remains open  
   **LAKE CHARLES, Louisiana—**The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Blue Roof program deadline is open through Oct. 24, 2020 for the Allen, Beauregard, Vernon, Jefferson Davis, Calcasieu and Cameron parishes for residences sustaining hurricane damage. Residents can sign up for the program online at www.usace.army.mil/BlueRoof or call toll free 1-888-ROOF-BLU (1-888-766-3258). Operation Blue Roof is a priority mission managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for FEMA. Operation Blue Roof aims to provide homeowners in disaster areas with fiber-reinforced plastic sheeting to cover their damaged roofs until permanent repairs are made. The program is currently active in Allen, Beauregard, Calcasieu, Cameron, Jefferson Davis and Vernon parishes. This program is a free service to homeowners. Operation Blue Roof protects property, reduces temporary housing costs, and allows residents to remain in their homes while recovering from the storm. This program is for primary residences or a permanently occupied rental property with less than 50 percent structural damage. Vacation rental properties are not eligible for this program. After the blue roof is installed, the structure is declared habitable. Roofs that are flat, made of clay, slate or asbestos tile do not qualify. Major storm debris must be removed for the roof to qualify, as contracted crews only have the ability to remove minor debris from damaged roofs. Note: Metal roofs and mobile homes will be repaired as practical on a case-by-case basis. Applying for the program includes a Right of Entry, or ROE, form, which allows Corps workers to access your property and assess your home's damage. The ROE also allows contracted crews to work on your roof. For more information regarding the recovery effort, please visit http://hurricanelaura.la.gov. **Public Service Announcement Products Available for Download:** **YouTube** 30-sec. Video:  (CC Available)
60-sec. Video:  (CC Available) **DVIDS**(https://www.dvidshub.net/) – **Login required** 30-sec. Video: 
  
   **Social Media** **Facebook**
   **Twitter**USACE Headquarters
   https://www.facebook.com/USACEHQ
   https://twitter.com/USACEHQUSACE Mississippi Valley Division
   https://www.facebook.com/mississippivalleydivision
   https://twitter.com/MVD_USACEUSACE St. Paul District
   https://www.facebook.com/usace.saintpaul/
   https://twitter.com/StPaulUSACEUSACE New Orleans District
   https://www.facebook.com/usacenola/
   https://twitter.com/TeamNewOrleansUSACE Vicksburg District
   https://www.facebook.com/VicksburgUSACE
   https://twitter.com/VicksburgUSACEUSACE Memphis
   https://www.facebook.com/MemphisUSACE/
   https://twitter.com/MemphisDistrict  ###
 Release no. 20-140 Operation Blue Roof
 Hurricane Delta
 Hurricane Laura
 FEMA
 USACE
Exhibit 4.421

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 179430 dated December 11, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

cable radio services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 11, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 11, 2019 No. 718-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY RASMUSSEN.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen C. Raffaele, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen C. Raffaele                             
|                    |  |     |  | Stephen C. Raffaele                                 
|                    |  |     |  | Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |     |  | Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of KLX Inc.

Set forth below is a list of subsidiaries of KLX Inc. Unless otherwise indicated, the following entities are wholly owned
subsidiaries of KLX Inc. and are owned directly by either KLX Inc. or by wholly owned subsidiaries of KLX Inc.

Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of FormationAdvanced Engineered Products LLC

DelawareBlitz 44-144 GmbH

GermanyC.M.P. SAS

FranceInterturbine Advanced Logistics Pty Limited

AustraliaInterturbine Aviation Logistics FZE

United Arab EmiratesInterturbine Aviation Logistics GmbH

GermanyInterturbine Aviation Logistics Ltd

United KingdomInterturbine Czechia s.r.o.

Czech RepublicInterturbine Hungary Kft.

HungaryInterturbine, LLC

DelawareInterturbine Logistics Solutions GmbH

GermanyInterturbine Projekt Management GmbH

GermanyInterturbine-RuSky OOO*

RussiaInterturbine Technologies GmbH

GermanyInterturbine Tianjin Limited

ChinaJay Cee Fastener Corp.

New JerseyKLX Aerospace Solutions (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongKLX Aerospace Solutions (STR) Limited

United KingdomKLX Aerospace Solutions DE Holding GmbH

GermanyKLX Aerospace Solutions Deutschland GmbH

GermanyKLX Aerospace Solutions GmbH

GermanyKLX Aerospace Solutions Limited

United KingdomKLX Aerospace Solutions II Limited

United KingdomKLX Aerospace Solutions S.r.l.

ItalyKLX Aerospace Solutions SAS

FranceKLX Aerospace Solutions II SAS

FranceKLX Aerospace Solutions sp. z o.o.

PolandKLX Aerospace Solutions s.r.o.

Czech RepublicKLX Aerospace Solutions Pte. Limited

SingaporeKLX Energy Holdings LLC

DelawareKLX Energy Services LLC

DelawareKLX Europe Holding Ltd.

United KingdomKLX International Inc.

DelawareKLX Investments I S.à r.l.

LuxembourgKLX Investments II S.à r.l.

LuxembourgKLX Investments III S.à r.l.

LuxembourgKLX RE Holdings LLC

DelawareM&M Aerospace Hardware, Inc.

FloridaN Y F Corp.

New JerseyUFC Aerospace Europe Limited

United KingdomUFC Aerospace LLC

DelawareUFC SARL

France


*KLX Inc.
owns less than 50% of the outstanding equity interests of this subsidiary.


---



QuickLinks
# Sitemap

## March 05, 2012

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2012
- 03
- March 05, 2012

            - “We Are The Explorers” Video Showcases Legacy Of Exploration, Future NASA Missions
            - Space Station Crew to Talk with Students in Silicon Valley
            - NASA Holds Briefings To Preview Space Station Expeditions
            - Across to Prometheus
            - X1 Solar Flare Eruption on March 5, 2012
            - Venus Hot Flow Anomaly
            - Jupiter From the Ground
            - Celebrating John Glenn’s Legacy
            - Insider’s Cassini: How to Plan Your Flyby
IN GENERAL TERM, 1873.

#### George W. Hill, Appellant, *v.*Claiborne L. Donaldson.

*Error*— assignment of-—

Exceptions.

Though an exception is duly taken to the refusal of the Court to grant a new trial, yet if the ruling of the Court is not assigned for error, the alleged errors accruing on the trial below, and on which the motion for a new trial is based, cannot be considered on appeal.

Where it appears from the bill of exceptions, that no evidence was offered to a paragraph made the subject of demurrer, the ruling of the Court on this demurrer cannot be assigned for error, as the party demurring is not injured thereby.

*E. A.*Parker, for appellant.

*Hanna Sf*Knefler, for appellee.

Newcomb, J.

The plaintiff sued to enforce a mechanics’ lien on the real estate of the defendant, to discharge an alleged indebtedness of one Jacob Coffman to plaintiff, for lumber furnished the former, and used in the construction of a dwelling house, erected by Coffman for the defendant.

There was a jury trial, a finding for the defendant, and judgment in his favor over plaintiff’s. motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff appealed to the General Term, and assigned the following errors:

1. The overruling of plaintiff’s demurrer to sixth paragraph of defendant’s answer.

*353
      *2.*The refosal of the Court to permit the plaintiff to prove certain items of his lumber account.

3. That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

4. That the verdict was contrary to law.

5. That the charge of the Court was error in law.

None of these' assignments, save the first, present any

questions of law on appeal. They were proper grounds for a motion for a new trial, and were presented as such at Special Term.

An exception was duly taken to the refusal of the Court to grant a new trial, but that ruling is not assigned for error. We cannot, therefore, consider these alleged errors occurring at the trial. .

*Whitinger*v. *Nelson,*29 *Ind.,*441; *Herrick*v. *Bunting,*Ib., 467 ; *Smith*v. *Crigler, Ib.,*516 ; *Lingerman*v. *Nave,*31 *Ib.,*222; *Stillwell*v. *Chappell,*30 *I b.,*72.

There is a bill of exceptions in the record, setting out the evidence given on the trial of the cause; and it appears from the bill of exceptions-that no evidence was given or offered in support of the sixth paragraph of the answer, consequently it is not necessary to decide as to the correctness of the ruling on the demurrer to that paragraph, as it is manifest that the plaintiff was in no respect injured thereby.

The judgment at Special Term is, therefore, affirmed, with, costs.
----

----

| /s/ James D. Kruger                  |        |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| James D. Kruger                      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer, Nelnet Inc. |   |

| /s/ Joseph E. Popevis            |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph E. Popevis                |        |
| President, Nelnet Servicing, LLC |   |

----

|   | Trust Name:                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | SLM Student Loan Trust 2010-1     |
|   | SLM Student Loan Trust 2010-2     |
|   | Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-2 |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-B |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2002-A |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2003-A |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2004-A |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2005-A |
|   | KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2006-A |
|   | GOAL NCMSLT 1                     |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2003-1                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2004-1                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2005-1                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2005-2                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2006-1                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2006-2                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2006-3                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2006-4                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2007-1                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2007-2                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2007-3                 |
|   | GOAL NCSLT 2007-4                 |
|   | GOAL NCT 2006-A                   |

----
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 15, 2005
Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
JESUS FAJARDO,

Petitioner, No. 05-9516
v. (BIA No. A70-688-340) ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, (Petition for Review)

Respondent.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , McKAY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f). The case is therefore subm itted without oral argument. Petitioner is an alien from El Salvador. In 1997, an immigration law judge (“ILJ”) found that he should be deported, denied hi s applications for asylum and withholding of deportation, and granted him voluntary departure. Petitioner-2-

appealed the ILJ’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) which dismissed his appeal on August 10, 1999. On July 1 9, 2000, Petitioner filed a motion to reopen his deportation proceedings which the BIA also denied. Subsequently, On February 9, 2005, Petitioner fileda second motion to reopen with the BIA. The BIA denied that motion as being numerically barred by its regulations. Petitioner now files the instant peti tion for a review of the BIA’s denial of his second motion to reopen. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen fo r an abuse of discretion. Infanzon v. Ashcroft , 386 F.3d 1335, 1362 (10th Cir. 2004). The Board “abuses its discretion when its decision prov ides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Generally, the BIA has “bro ad discretion” to grant or deny a motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992) (quoting INS v. Rios-Pineda , 471 U.S. 444, 449 (1985)). There is nothing in this case indicating that the B IA abused its discretion when it denied Petitioner’s second motion to reopen . In its order, the BIA explained, “[T]he motion to reopen exceeds the nume rical limitations for motions to reopen and will be denied.” A.R. at 2; see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). The order further explained that the BIA is generally limitedto reviewing only one motion-3-

to reopen, except in certain circumstances not pres ent in Petitioner’s case. Based on our review of the facts and relevant law s urrounding this issue, we determine that the BIA did not abuse its discret ion when it denied Petitioner’s second motion to reopen. Accordingly, the BIA’s decision is AFFIRMED
. Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge