alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10931 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER HORDGE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-206-5 Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to r e present Christopher Hordge has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed original and supplemental briefs in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ho r d ge has not filed a response. We have reviewed
c ounsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. W e concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no unfrivolous issue U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 5, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-10931 Document: 00512134786 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2013No. 11-10931

for appellate revi e w . Ac c ordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities h e r e i n , and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-10931 Document: 00512134786 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2013
# **Exhibit 31.2**

#  

**Certification**

 

I, Paul Tate,certify that:

 

1.                                       I havereviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Frontier Airlines, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

Date        November 10, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    |   /s/  Paul H. Tate        |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   Paul  H. Tate            |
|   |   |   Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
| |  | US Bank (logo)                                                                                                      
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                                                                                     
| |  | Global
                         Corporate Trust

60
Livingston Avenue

EP-MN-WS3D

Saint
Paul, MN 55107


usbank.com



Annual
Statement of Compliance

Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18



VIA:
EMAIL



Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
Attention: Stephen Holmes
stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com





| | Re: | Pooling
                                            and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between
                                            Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the
                                            Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender
                                            Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee, Certificate
                                            Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Thomas C. Campbell, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, as a certifying servicer hereby certify
that:



(1)  
A review of the activities of the Custodian during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Custodian under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)   
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Custodian has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.





Date:
February 10, 2024





U.S.
Bank National Association, as Custodian





|By: | /s/
  Thomas C. Campbell                   | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Thomas C. Campbell
  Senior Vice President |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 26, and Wednesday 
October 27, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Gaylord National Resort, and 
Convention Center, 201 Waterfront St., National Harbor, MD 20745.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Jehlen, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone 
(202) 493-4527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, October 26, 
and Wednesday, October 27, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover a continuation of the 
ATPAC's review of present air traffic control procedures and practices 
for standardization, revision, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes;
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern;
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items;
    4. Report from Executive Director;
    5. Items of Interest; and
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify Mr. 
Richard Jehlen no later than October 19, 2010. Any member of the public 
may present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the address 
given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 6, 2010.
Richard Jehlen,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-25838 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### G.L.H., BY HIS GUARDIANS AD LITEM, GEORGE H. AND GAIL R. HENNINGSEN v. EDWARD GOLA, SUPERINTENDENT, AND THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HOPEWELL VALLEY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT.

November 3, 1986.

Leave to appeal and to vacate the stay imposed by the Appellate Division are granted, and the stay heretofore imposed *29by the Appellate Division is vacated, effective immediately, but without prejudice to an appropriate application to the State Board of Education.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13
<PP&E>                                          44,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               61
<BONDS>                                          2,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          67
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,463
<SALES>                                            334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   334
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 122 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 122

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

   Mr. Smith of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $10,969,956 for the One 
Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,484,978 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2017, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2018; and
            (2) not more than $5,484,978 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2018, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2019.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# Mississippi Valley Division News Releases

Mississippi Valley Division News Releases RSS Feed

- In the Valley: Female Leader Perspectives U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Mississippi Valley Division (MVD) Commanding General Maj. Gen. Diana Holland hosted a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Virtual Forum on April 29, 2021. The topic for the forum was ‘In the Valley: Female Leader Perspectives’, and panelists included the top female Deputy District Engineers for Programs Project Management (DPM) throughout the region; Kim Thomas, Rock Island District DPPM, Susan Wilson, St. Louis District DPPM, and Pat Hemphill, Vicksburg District DPPM. 
- USACE Vicksburg District announces new Internal Review chief VICKSBURG, Miss. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Vicksburg District has selected Cora Fuller as chief of Internal Review.Fuller will advise USACE Vicksburg District Commander Robert Hilliard on accounting, financial, and managerial issues that require examination by a financial professional. In this role, she will provide a full spectrum of internal review and related services designed to add value to command operations.
- Mississippi River Commission and Corps of Engineers tour Missouri River Leaders from The Mississippi River Commission along with leaders from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers toured the Missouri River Mar. 29 – Apr. 1. Lt. Gen. Scott A. Spellmon, chief of engineers and commanding general, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Brig. Gen. D. Peter Hemlinger, commander, Northwestern Division, Col. William Hannan Jr., commander, Kansas City District and Col. Mark Himes, commander, Omaha District, met with partners and stakeholders and visited sites along the river.
- USACE Vicksburg District Small Business Office achieves top metrics at national awards ceremony An office with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Vicksburg District was honored at a national awards ceremony Friday for outstanding contributions.
- Holland appointed to Mississippi River Commission President Donald J. Trump recently appointed Major General Diana M. Holland as a member and as the 41st President of the Mississippi River Commission (MRC).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 85

#### Nancy Harrington, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Alexander Harrington, defendant in error.

[1.] Where, by the record, it appears that an order is taken, referring a case stated to the Judge_,of the Superior Court, rather as an arbitrator, than as constituting the Court, and where, by the terms of the reference, it appears that the decision of the Judge was contemplated as final, and no provision was made for suing out a writ of error by either party: *Held,*that this was not such a decision, sentence, judgment or decree, as was contemplated by the law organizing this Court; and that the writ of error should be dismissed. ’

Motion. Dougherty Superior Court. Decision hy Judge Perkins, May Term, 1854.

This was an appeal from the Ordinary, on a motion to dismiss Nancy Harrington, as administratrix of Robert Harrington, deceased. The facts were agreed on, as follows: “ The charge against her was, that she had not returned, as a part of the estate, a negro woman named Irena, in the possession of intestate at his death. The negro was bought and paid for, hy the intestate, her husband, hut the hill of sale, hy his direction, was made directly to Nancy Harrington,, her heirs and assigns. By parol, it was proven that he intended a separate estate. It was agreed, in writing, between the parties, that the facts be submitted to His Honor, W. C. Perkins, and if the Court should decide that the negro is a part of the estate, the administratrix was to relinquish her claim and pay the costs. If the Court decides her claim to he good, the rule to be discharged.

Judge Perkins decided that the negro was a part of the estate, and upon this, Nancy Harrington assigns error.

Issue was joined in this Court, with a protestation, in the ground that error docs not lie to a judgment entered in this case, as stated, because the judgment rendered, was hy Judge Perkins, as arbitrator under a submission, and his award is final.

*562Strozier, for plaintiff in error..

Lyon and Clark, for defendant.

*By the Court.*

Starnes, J.,

delivering tbe opinion.

[1.] This record shows that the agreement was, to refer this case to Judge Perkins, as a sort of arbitrator, and not to the Superior Court. There -was no reservation, in the order- of reference, of the right of either party to except and bring his writ of error; and altogether, it impresses us as very plain, that the reference was made in the manner in which.it'was, for the purpose of obtaining a speedy and final disposition of the case, by the decision of Judge Perkins.

We do not mean to discourage the convenient practice of presenting to this Court, a writ of error based on a decision, made upon a case stated, when this is in conformity with the understanding of the parties, and so appears in the record. We mean only to say, that according to this record, in our opinion, it does not appear that it was the intention of the parties to sue out a writ of error, and that this was not such “ decision, sentence, judgment or decree”, as was contemplated by the organic law of this Court.
# e-Filing Policies

- MSPB e-Appeal Policy on Agency Initial Contacts
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C.E. Rick Strattan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: February 2, 2011
By:
/s/ C.E. Rick StrattanC.E. Rick StrattanChief Executive Officer(principal executive, financial and accounting officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,404
<SECURITIES>                                     1,273
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,195
<INVENTORY>                                     40,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,067
<PP&E>                                         119,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,139
<BONDS>                                         45,548
<COMMON>                                           187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,763
<SALES>                                         96,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,711
<CGS>                                           73,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,023)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,822)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,676)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26409]

[[Page 64708]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1717]

Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 5 Under 
Alternative Site Framework; Seattle, WA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) 
as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose 
zones;
    Whereas, the Port of Seattle, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 5, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 30-2010, filed 04/29/
2010) for authority to reorganize and expand under the ASF with a 
service area of King and Snohomish Counties, Washington (dependent on 
case-by-case concurrence from the Port of Everett for the latter 
county), within and adjacent to the Seattle Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, FTZ 5's existing Sites 1, 2 and 4 would be 
categorized as magnet sites, existing Site 3 would be categorized as a 
usage-driven sites, and the grantee proposes one additional usage-
driven site (Site 5);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 24571, 05/05/10) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 5 under the 
alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone 
project, to a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that 
would terminate authority for Sites 2 and 4 if not activated by October 
31, 2015, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven 
sites that would terminate authority for Sites 3 and 5 if no foreign-
status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by 
October 31, 2013.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26409 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```