alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Asteriko Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to
such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended June 30, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Ilia Tomski
------------------------------------
Ilia Tomski
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 7, 2016
#### ELAINE AND LOUIS GROPER v. CAPE MAY GREENE, INC., ETC.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See *Chattin v. Cape May Greene, Inc.,*216 *N.J.Super.*618)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS MURPHY.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10204 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DAVID DELGADO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 242

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent David Delgado has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Delgado h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 28, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10204 Document: 00514661642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2018No. 18

- 10204

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from fu rther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-10204 Document: 00514661642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2018
William D. Spencer, Clerk of the Board

Merit Systems Protection Board

1615 M Street NW

Washington DC 20419

Dear Mr. Spencer:

This is in response to the request for comments solicitation contained in Federal 

Register Notice Volume 79, Number 64, dated April 3, 2014, regarding revising 

regulations governing how jurisdiction is established over Merit Systems 

Protection Board (MSPB) appeals.

The Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Human Resources Management, 

Employee Relations and Performance Management Service, would like to 

recommend that the Board reconsider language previously contained in Option C 

from Federal Register Notice Volume 78, Number 217, dated November 8, 2013. 

Specifically, we would like the Board to consider adding Section 1201.5, 

“Establishing appellate jurisdiction” to the regulations, or modifying Sections 

1201.56 and 1201.57 to incorporate this language. Adding jurisdictional 

requirements makes it clear for both appellants and agencies as to what must be 

proved by preponderant evidence. This is not only helpful to appellants who 

may be pro se, but also representatives who may not be familiar with federal case 

law. It will also assist agencies when preparing for defense of their actions. 

 

Additionally, we would like to propose incorporation of the table included in the 

discussion portion of Option C, entitled “Elements/Issues in MSPB Appeals,” be 

included in either the regulations or as a tool on the MSPB website.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the proposed 

revisions to MSPB regulations.

 

Larry Ables

Director, Employee Relations || OHRM

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   277
<PP&E>                                          41,404
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               79
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,192
<SALES>                                            569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   569
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       226
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this Quarterly
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Downey Bridgwater, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater                       
|                   |  |     |  | J. Downey Bridgwater                           
|                   |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32


Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Credit Income Fund on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Carey Credit Income Fund does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofCarey Credit Income Fund.

Date:March 15, 2016/s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMARK J. DECESARISChief Executive OfficerDate:March 15, 2016/s/ Paul S. Saint-PierrePAUL S. SAINT-PIERREChief Financial Officer


The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of Carey Credit Income Fund or the certifying officers.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Credit Income Fund and will be retained by Carey Credit Income Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, John Kallas, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P. (the “Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of the Partnership, and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Partnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Partnership’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Partnership’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 12, 2005     /s/ JOHN KALLAS John Kallas  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of CCC  
21
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LOUISE M. HORBATT, A/K/A LOUISE HORBATT, DECEASED.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERROL STANLEY BURNETT.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 815

To amend title 38, United States Code, to adjust certain limits on the 
  guaranteed amount of a home loan under the home loan program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

  Mr. Zeldin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to adjust certain limits on the 
  guaranteed amount of a home loan under the home loan program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMOUNT OF LOAN GUARANTEED UNDER HOME LOAN PROGRAM OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Adjustment of Loan Limit.--Section 3703(a)(1) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)(IV)--
                    (A) by striking ``the lesser of''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or 25 percent of the loan''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``Freddie Mac'' and 
        all that follows through the period and inserting ``amount of 
        the loan.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to a loan guaranteed under section 3710 of title 38, 
United States Code, on or after the date that is 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 87-6260.

No. 87-6522.

No. 87-6554.

#### Rougeau *v.*Texas. Messer *v.*Zant, Warden. Oliver *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; C. A. 11th Cir.; and Gen. Ct. Justice, Super. Ct. Div., Robeson County, N. C. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, *Gregg*v. *Georgia,*428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID ANDERSON.

May 12, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. The judgement of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent that the resentencing of defendant shall be conducted in light of *State v. Hartye,*105 *N.J.*411 (1987) and *State v. O’Connor,*105 *N.J.*399 (1987).
Since October 2020, four massive pillar collapses have occurred in limestone 

mines. Each was accompanied by a powerful airblast and the formation of a 

large surface sinkhole. Fortunately they did not result in any injuries. In 2015, 

three miners were seriously injured by an airblast from a fifth pillar collapse. 

All of these collapses involved tall, slender pillars in benched areas. Four were in 

“legacy” areas that had been mined many years ago.

At this seminar, MSHA Technical Support’s Roof Control Division will be 

providing information to raise awareness of these collapse events. They will also 

present ways to assess and mitigate the risks associated with a massive 

collapses in both active workings and legacy areas.

Presentation topics:

1) Overview of recent limestone pillar collapse events

2) Limestone pillar design using the NIOSH S-Pillar program

3) Risk Analysis for limestone pillar collapse

4) Investigation and analysis of airblast risk from pillar collapse

The Seminar will be presented remotely via Microsoft TEAMS.

A certificate for four (4) Professional Development Hours (PDHs) will be 

provided to participants. Please register at least 3 business days prior to 

the seminar to receive the meeting invitation. 

To Register or Questions, email: PillarInitiative@dol.gov

When registering, please provide your full name, 

company or organization, phone number, and the date of 

the seminar you would like to attend. 

For more information, visit www.msha.gov/PillarInitiative 

MSHA DALLAS AND BIRMINGHAM DISTRICTS

STONE MINE PILLAR COLLAPSE SEMINAR

January 11, 2022 8:00am - 12:00pm (CT)
# Sitemap

## July 12, 2022

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2022
- 07
- July 12, 2022

            - City lights of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
            - City lights of São Paulo, Brazil
            - Sun glint on the Caspian Sea
            - City lights of Italy
            - City lights of Curitiba, Brazil
            - Webb’s First Deep Field
            - Admin. Nelson Describes the First Full-color Image from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope
            - Admin. Nelson at the Broadcast Releasing Images from the James Webb Space Telescope
            - NASA’s Webb Reveals Cosmic Cliffs, Glittering Landscape of Star Birth
            - NASA’s Webb Sheds Light on Galaxy Evolution, Black Holes
#### EDWARD R. KLAUSS, PROSECUTOR, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND TOWN OF IRVINGTON, RESPONDENTS.

Argued January 16, 1945

Decided January 29, 1945.

Before Justices Case, Bodinb and Porter.

Eor the prosecutor, *Thomas Brunetto.*

Eor the respondents, *Walter B. Van Riper*and *John J. Gafey.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The writ of *certiorari*in this case was granted to review an order of the Civil Service Commission of this state bearing date August 1st, 1944, relative to the case of Edward R. Klauss. So far as pertinent, the order was as follows: ‘That the application of Edward R. Klauss for further hearing on his dismissal as Patrolman, Police Department, Department of Public Safety, Irvington, effective January 4th, 1944, heard on appeal by this Commission on April 27th, 1944, and upon which this commission made and published its ruling on June 27th, 1944, be and the same is hereby denied.”

Written charges were preferred against Klauss. He was duly tried and found guilty. He appealed to the Civil Service Commission. His counsel submitted the case on the testimony taken below. The dismissal was affirmed. He thereafter petitioned the Commission to reopen the case because it had failed to hear witnesses, receive all competent evidence, and lastly that his attorney was not authorized to submit the case on the record below.

*435The prosecutor has nothing to complain of save the action of his attorney. He was present, he could have spoken up but he let the ease go in. Confronted by an adverse decision he sought a rehearing. There must be an end of all things. Certainly, an attorney may stipulate the evidence in an appeal. It is frequently done. The reopening of a case once heard rests in the sound discretion of the Civil Service Commission. There is nothing before us to show an abuse of such action.

We have, however, examined the original charges, the summary of the proofs and determination by the Director of Public Safety respecting them, and it is clear to us that the action taken by him was in all respects proper.

The writ will be dismissed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Michael D. Burger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 1, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|                                                                                                |  |                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                                                                                | 
|By:                                                                                             |  | /s/ MICHAEL D. BURGER
|Michael D. Burger Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

April 14, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen C. Raffaele, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2003

                                                       /s/ Stephen C. Raffaele
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Stephen C. Raffaele
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       Sterling Bancshares, Inc.