alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sitemap

## April 06, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 04
- April 06, 2016

            - NASA ER-2 Prepares to Support NOAA GOES-R Satellite
            - NASA Awards Sounding Rocket Operations Contract
            - I Will Launch America: Launch Vehicle Chief Engineer Dan Dorney
            - This Week in NASA History: STS-37 Crew Deploys Compton Gama-Ray Observatory — April 8, 1991
            - NIMPH: Nano Icy Moons Propellant Harvester
            - ICON and Airglow – Nighttime View
            - ICON and Airglow – Daytime View
            - The Marshall Star
            - Computer-Simulated Image of a Supermassive Black Hole
            - NASA Glenn Announces Open House Details
#### FIDELITY UNION BANK v. GEORGE TRIM.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-50877 Summary Calendar

SANDRA COTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS DOTTIE RIEMER; VIRGINIA HAAS; NANCY DUNCAN, Officially and Individually; AISD BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PAM HALL, In her official and individual capacity; AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

A-99-CV-669-SS March 16, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for the reasons assigned in its order of August 8, 2000. AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JESSE SHERROD.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Mississippi Valley Division News

Mississippi Valley Division News RSS Feed

- The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg District welcomes home the Dredge Jadwin and crew just in time for the holidays. VICKSBURG, Miss. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg District welcomed home the Dredge Jadwin and crew Nov. 18, 2021, to the Vicksburg Harbor just in time for the holidays.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3727

___________

Anthony Keith Lanos, and others in *

class action suit that are still awaiting *

the right to sue from the EEOC, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

URS Logistics, doing business as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Americold Logistics, Inc., *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 28, 2000

Filed: December 4, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Keith Lanos appeals the district court's order dismissing under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C) Lanos's employment discrimination action against

his former employer, URS Logistics (URS). Lanos failed to provide URS with

requested discovery, despite three court orders to do so. Having carefully reviewed the

record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Lanos's
-2-

action. See Boogaerts v. Bank of Bradley, 961 F.2d 765, 768 (8th Cir. 1992) (per

curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
US
Bank(logo)



| | Global
    Corporate Trust
| | --------------------------
| | 60
    Livingston Avenue  
| | EP-MN-WS3D                
| | Saint
    Paul, MN 55107  
| |                           
| | usbank.com                



Annual
Statement of Compliance



Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18



VIA:
EMAIL



Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585
Broadway



New
York, New York 10036



Attention:
Stephen Holmes



stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



|Re: | Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between
                                         Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
                                         as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge
                                         Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee,
                                         Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Thomas C. Campbell, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, as a certifying servicer hereby certify
that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Custodian during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the
performance of the Custodian under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Custodian has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 22, 2022



U.S.
Bank National Association, as Custodian



|By: | /s/
    Thomas C. Campbell | 
|--- | -------------------------- | 
|    | Thomas C. Campbell         | 
|    | Senior Vice President      |
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer" ). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions" ).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Steven TAUZIN.

No. 2010-KP-1933.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Tauzin, Steven; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 1, No. 207,886; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,-657-KW.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc., as subservicer, Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016                                                 
|                                                                     
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior
Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
Exhibit 10.34


 


Transfer agreement of Piano Education
Center


 


Party A: Shenzhen Jiana Technology Co.,
Ltd


 


Party B: Zhongdemei Piano (Shenzhen)
Co., Ltd


 


Through friendly negotiation,
Party A and Party B have reached the following agreement on the transfer of Piano Education Center:


 


1. Party A agrees
to transfer the “Piano Education Center” located at No. 108 shop, Fifth Avenue, Bao’an District, Shenzhen to Party B,
including lease, interior decoration, facilities and equipment, with a building area of about 442.11 square meters, and ensure
that Party B has the same rights and obligations as Party A in the original housing lease contract, and Party B agrees to accept
the transfer; Party A agrees to transfer the “Piano Education Center” located on the third floor of Beijing Oriental
Huadu small talent education city, Wenjin Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, including lease, interior decoration and facilities and
equipment, with a building area of about 610 square meters, and ensure that Party B has the same rights and obligations as Party
A in the original housing lease contract, and Party B agrees to accept;


 


2. Party A shall
transfer the above two centers to Party B at a price of RMB 1.45 million. After the transfer, Party B agrees to perform the terms
stipulated in the original store lease contract on behalf of Party A, and pay the rent and the water and electricity fees and other
fees that shall be paid by Party A as stipulated in the contract on a regular basis. In the future, if Party B signs the lease
contract with the landlord, Party A agrees to cooperate.


 


3. After the
transfer, the existing decoration, decoration and all other equipment and house decoration of the shop and all business equipment
belongs to Party B.


 


4. Party B shall
pay the transfer fee to Party A on April 30, 2019 totaling RMB 1.45 million (in words: one million four hundred and fifty thousand).


 


5. Party A shall
be responsible for all creditor’s rights and debts of the shop before Party B takes over; Party B shall be responsible for all
business activities and creditor’s rights and debts generated after Party B takes over.


 


6. After the
signing of the agreement, both parties shall consciously abide by it and shall not breach the contract. If one party breaches the
contract, it shall compensate the other party for all losses caused by it. If Party B’s operation is damaged due to irresistible
factors such as natural disasters, it has nothing to do with Party A.


 


7.Others


 


(1). Matters not covered
in this Agreement shall be supplemented in words after negotiation by both parties, which shall have the same legal effect.


 


(2). This agreement
is made in duplicate, one for each party, and shall come into force as of the date when both parties affix their seals.


 


	Party A (seal):  	Party B (seal):
	 	 
	Shenzhen Jiana Technology Co., Ltd	Zhongdemei Piano (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
	 	 
	 	Date: December 1, 2017
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK BRUCATO.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell
Bendel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 11, 2015



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Russell Bendel                 
|Russell Bendel                     
|Chief Executive Officer & President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NORWOOD L. WHITE.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### CLIFFORD A. EGER, ET UX. v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HELMER VALENCIA HIDARRAGA.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     KENNETH COLE PRODUCTIONS,  INC.  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,
     1997,  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
     JUNE  30,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                         1,406       
<SECURITIES>                                   0           
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,951      
<ALLOWANCES>                                   65          
<INVENTORY>                                    29,302      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,220      
<PP&E>                                         14,125      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,324       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 67,303      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,108      
<BONDS>                                        0           
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0           
<PREFERRED>                                    0           
<COMMON>                                       132         
<OTHER-SE>                                     50,855      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   67,303      
<SALES>                                        85,262      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,262      
<CGS>                                          53,669      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,669      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,743       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,697       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,046       
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0           
<CHANGES>                                      0           
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,046       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .30         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .30         
                                               




</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAVIER ARROYO.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### LOUIS SOTOMAYER, ET AL. v. FERNANDO VASQUEZ, ET AL. AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY.

January 28, 1987.

Leave to appeal granted.
# Communication, cooperation and coordination key to keeping Mississippi River open for commercial navigation

Working around the clock, five dredges directed by the  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are battling extreme low-water conditions along the Mississippi River to keep commercial navigation moving on America’s super highway. 

 

With dredges moving rapidly from one trouble spot to another to keep up with dynamic low water operational demands, the Corps is also working very closely with the navigation industry and the U.S. Coast Guard to communicate concerns, groundings and changing conditions to avoid accidents and river closures.

 

Unless additional rainfall occurs, the latest long-range forecast calls for river conditions to continue to fall through the end of August with new low-water records possible at several key navigation points along the lower Mississippi between Cairo, Ill., and Baton Rouge. Several joint navigation interest teams, including the 

Lower Mississippi River Committee and the River Industry Executive Task Force, are meeting daily to address the low-water issues with closer coordination and continuous communication.

 

Of particular concern are the harbors along the lower river that require additional dredging as the water levels possibly fall to historic lows. The harbors serve as on-ramps for the transportation of 500 million tons of commodities that are transported annually along the 12,000-mile-long inland waterways system. The Corps operates 19 shallow-draft harbors on the lower Mississippi River and several may close temporarily until dredging can be executed. The plan is to keep the majority of the harbors open to provide a reliable conduit for perishable goods and other critical commodities. 

 

Along the upper Mississippi River, 29 locks and dams maintain a minimum navigation channel depth of nine feet. As river levels continue to fall however, dredging will keep trouble spots open in the river between the locks. Dredging will continue along the middle Mississippi River although existing river training structures such as dikes and chevrons have provided improved navigation conditions and reduced dredging requirements for many areas. 

**Contact**

Release no. 12-014

Mississippi River

commercial navigation

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Mississippi Valley Division