alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 761 

To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation as an offset for other Federal spending. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2017 

Mr. RENACCI (for himself, Mr. POCAN, Mr. KILMER, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, and Mr. BUCSHON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit 

Guaranty Corporation as an offset for other Federal 

spending. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pension and Budget 

5 Integrity Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 761 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF PREMIUMS AS AN 

2 OFFSET. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the Senate and the House of 

4 Representatives, for purposes of determining points of 

5 order under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 

6 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) or any concurrent resolution on the 

7 budget, any provision that increases, or extends the in8 crease of, any premiums payable to the Pension Benefit 

9 Guaranty Corporation shall not be counted in estimating 

10 the level of budget authority, outlays, or revenues— 

11 (1) in the Senate, for any bill, joint resolution, 

12 amendment, amendment between the Houses, con13 ference report, or motion; or 

14 (2) in the House of Representatives, for any bill 

15 or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or con16 ference report thereon. 

17 (b) RULES OF SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENT18 ATIVES.—Congress adopts the provisions of this section— 

19 (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of 

20 the Senate and the House of Representatives, re21 spectively, and as such is deemed a part of the rules 

22 of each House, respectively, and supersede other 

23 rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent 

24 with such rules; and 

25 (2) with full recognition of the constitutional 

26 right of either House to change the rules (so far as 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 761 IH

1 relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, 

2 in the same manner, and to the same extent as in 

3 the case of any other rule of that House. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
584 A.2d 228

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEIGHTON SENIOR.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30423

Summary Calendar

 

PATRICIA EVANS; ET AL,

Plaintiffs,

PATRICIA EVANS; AUTHURINE BRISBON

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; ET AL,

Defendants,

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NEW ORLEANS; CARMEN F. VALENTI, Housing

Authority of New Orleans Board of Commissioners; CATHERINE D.

LAMBERG, Administrative Receiver; CYNTHIA WIGGINS, Resident

Advisor to the Board,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No.03-CV-2411

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, plaintiffs Patricia Evans and Authurine

Brison appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claim against
No. 04-50026

-2-

the Housing Authority of New Orleans (“HANO”), and HANO employees

Mr. Carmen F. Valenti, Ms. Catherine Lamberg, and Ms. Cynthia

Wiggins. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated their

constitutional rights by building and operating their subsidized

housing on a waste site, thus creating horrible living conditions,

and “retaliating” against plaintiffs. Although plaintiffs’

original complaint did not cite 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district

court construed their pro se compliant liberally and found that

their allegations might be construed as being brought under § 1983.

The district court gave plaintiffs the opportunity to amend

their complaint against Mr. Carmen F. Valenti, Ms. Catherine

Lamberg and Ms. Cynthia Wiggins, all employees of the Housing

Authority of New Orleans, to plead facts sufficient to overcome

their defense of qualified immunity. See Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d

1427 (5th Cir. 1995). After considering all of plaintiffs’

subsequent filings the district court found that plaintiffs had not

pleaded facts sufficient to make out such a claim, or any other

federal claim, and dismissed their claims with prejudice. 

Upon a review of the record we find that plaintiffs have not

alleged facts sufficient to establish any federal cause of action

and the district court therefore properly dismissed their claims.

 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated April 8, 2009 on our review of the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of and for the three
month periods ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 is incorporated by reference in the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-72756. Pursuant
to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
|Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.    
|Houston, Texas                      
|April 14, 2009
#### EBE HELM v. BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC., ET AL.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of                           ( print page 63844)                        Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, October 13, 2010, 7 p.m. to October 14, 2010, 5 p.m., Radisson National Airport, 2020 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 16, 2010, 179 FR 56551.                 

The meeting location has changed. The meeting will be held at the Hilton Crystal City at Washington Reagan National Airport, 2399 Jefferson Davis Highway in Arlington, VA 22202. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: October 7, 2010. 

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26183 Filed 10-15-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES DELOATCH.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ L. George Klaus                            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | L. George Klaus                                
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  

I, Michael Pietrini, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael Pietrini                                                                                    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Michael Pietrini                                                                                        
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Executive VicePresident Finance and Administration(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.378

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 172248 dated May 23, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

cable radio services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 23, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated February 26, 2019 No. 111-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63864-63865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. NCUA Strategic Plan 2011-2016.
    2. Final Rule--Parts 701 and 742 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Fixed Assets and Regulatory Flexibility Program.
    3. Briefing--Merger Partner Registry.
    4. Insurance Fund Report.

RECESS: 11 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Insurance Appeals (2). Closed pursuant to some or all of the 
following: Exemptions (4) and (6).
    2. Consideration of Supervisory Activities (5). Closed pursuant to 
some or all of the following: Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

[[Page 63865]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26289 Filed 10-14-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from Financial Statements for the three (3) months ended March 31, 1997 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for quarterly
period ended March 31, 1997.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   (6,254)
<SECURITIES>                                             14,913
<RECEIVABLES>                                            43,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                              85,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        306,783
<PP&E>                                                   73,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                           44,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          595,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    16,015
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                    120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                              560,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            595,203
<SALES>                                                  79,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         79,610
<CGS>                                                    21,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            69,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         11,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (22,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (22,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (22,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.02)
                                                               

</TABLE>
Document

Exhibit 10.23
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 
TO THE
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC, DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


The Keysight Technologies, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), effective August 1, 2014, is hereby amended as follows effective October 24, 2014:
In Appendix A, of the Plan and any accompanying references throughout the Plan, references to the "Vanguard Balance Index Fund - Signal Shares" are deleted in their entirety and replaced with "Vanguard Balanced Index Fund - Admiral Shares".
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Keysight Technologies,  Inc. has caused this Amendment Number 1 to the Plan to be executed in its name and behalf on this 6th day of November, 2014, by its officer thereunto duly authorized.












												
				KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
				By: /s/ Ingrid Estrada
				Name: Ingrid Estrada
				Title: Senior Vice President of Human Resources
				Keysight Technologies, Inc.
#### ARY FUN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the
                           Company.

Date:  August 9, 2006                           By:     /s/ ZSOLT RUMY
       --------------                              ---------------------------
                                                          Zsolt Rumy
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALAN DARRAGH.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 35.2



|     |  |                                                                         
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | CMBS Department 
MAC N9401-011 1055 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Citibank, N.A.

388 GREENWICH ST

NEW YORK, New York 10013-2375



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C17
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Custodian (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 8, 2016



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|GAIL VANNEST  
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,377,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,062,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,779,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,257,068
<PP&E>                                       2,039,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,339,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,795,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,219,874
<COMMON>                                    24,904,957
<OTHER-SE>                                (20,580,430)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,339,410
<SALES>                                      3,902,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,902,257
<CGS>                                        2,712,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,852,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (68,512)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,881,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,881,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,881,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        

</TABLE>
584 A.2d 251

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRUCE ROBERT HODGES.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
AS A MINER, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO: 

A 

 

A 

A 

,A 

,A 

A 

,A 

Be given effective health and safety training. 

Be protected from discrimination for exercising your 

rights. 

File or make a complaint of danger, or safety or health 

violation to a federal or state agency, a mine operator, 

an operator's agent or a miners' representative. 

Refuse to work in conditions you believe are unsafe, 

unhealthy, or illegal (after notifying the operator of the 

condition and giving them an opportunity to address 

the situation). 

A medical evaluation or to be considered for transfer 

to another job location because of harmful physical 

agents and toxic substances. 

Exercise any rights afforded by the Mine Act. 

Select a representative for safety and health purposes. 

YOU DO NOT NEED TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF 

WHEN REPORTING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION! 

U.S. Department of Labor 

MSHA 

MiMSafety&lltalthAdministralion 

msha.gov/MinersRights