alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sitemap

## September 30, 2019

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2019
- 09
- September 30, 2019

            - NASA Television to Cover Return of Astronaut Nick Hague, Crewmates
            - International Observe the Moon Night Celebrates 10 Years of Lunar Engagement
            - Spitzer Spots a Starry Region Bursting With Bubbles
            - Four Expedition 60 crewmembers and a spaceflight participant
            - NASA Television to Air 10 Upcoming Spacewalks, Preview Briefing
            - Fast-Track to the Moon: NASA Opens Call for Artemis Lunar Landers
            - Solver Spotlight: Lauren Fell
            - Viewing a Launch From Above
            - NASA Ames Astrogram – September 2019
            - Sol 2543-2544: Dumping Dirt on its Back
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20419

Contact: William Spencer FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

202-653-7200 May 7, 2012

 TDD/Videophone Users:

Please Call Via Relay 

MSPB REVISING ITS ADJUDICATORY REGULATIONS

The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is planning a comprehensive revision 

of its adjudicatory regulations in 5 C.F.R. Parts 1200, 1201, 1208, and 1209. This will take the 

form of notice-and-comment rulemaking via the Federal Register, as required by the 

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553. We expect that final rules will be issued this fall. 

The unprecedented review marks the first significant reconsideration of MSPB’s regulations 

since the agency’s establishment in 1979.

This initiative began in January 2011 with the solicitation of suggestions for revisions 

from MSPB staff. Subsequently, an internal MSPB working group completed an in-depth review 

of the regulations, considered the suggestions received from staff, and identified a number of 

proposed changes. In accordance with the public participation requirement in Executive Order 

13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” the Board Members then sought written 

input on the working group recommendations from over 30 stakeholder agencies, organizations, 

and individuals. 

Written comments were received from 15 stakeholders, who were invited to make 

additional comments at an in-person meeting with MSPB staff on March 6, 2012. 

The MSPB working group is now in the process of reviewing the 80 pages of written 

comments and the transcript of the one-hour meeting. This review will result in a Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking to be published in the Federal Register on or about June 1, 2012.

Chairman Susan Grundmann stated, “This is a watershed event for MSPB. We knew 

MSPB staff and our external stakeholders would have good ideas about improving the 

adjudicatory process for all participants. We are taking those suggestions into account in order 

to better serve everyone going forward.”

Relevant documents are posted on MSPB’s website at www.mspb.gov/regulatoryreview.

The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is an independent, quasi-judicial agency whose mission is to 

protect the Merit System Principles and promote an effective Federal workforce free of Prohibited Personnel 

Practices.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. Downey Bridgwater, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater
|                        |  |     |  | J. Downey Bridgwater    
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman, President and 
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 30, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Russell Bendell, Chief Executive Officer & President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2015



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Russell Bendel                 
|Russell Bendel                     
|Chief Executive Officer & President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MANUEL CAESAR ALLEN.

October 13, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELOISE WIGGS.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP3 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the
manager of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. III (the
Partnership), certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the
period ended September 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Partnership. /s/ Patrick L. Beach
Exhibit 4.374

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169315 dated July 30, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

Research and production association «Progressivniye Technologii»

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1025001631137

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

5013008091

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

7A, Amet-Khan Sultana str.,Zhukovsky, Moscow region, 140180

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 30, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 18, 2018 No. 735-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.A.Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Byrne, Principal Financial Officer of Sterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 3, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Daniel G. Byrne                                                       
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Daniel G. Byrne                                                           
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and
Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterling and will be retained by Sterling
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL SANGLANG

RESURECCION, a.k.a. Michael

Sangalang Resurreccion,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72605

Agency No. A077-313-252

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael Sanglang Resureccion, a native and citizen of the Philippines,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to

FILED

MAY 05 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72605

reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia and denying his motion to

remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894

(9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Resureccion’s motion to

reopen as untimely where he failed to show that he acted with the due diligence

required to warrant equitable tolling of the filing deadline. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (motion to reopen must be filed within 180 days of

deportation order entered in absentia); Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (a petitioner

may obtain equitable tolling based on ineffective assistance of counsel as long as

he “act[ed] with due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud, or error”).

Because the agency’s conclusion that Resureccion failed to act with due

diligence upon discovering that he had been ordered removed in absentia is

dispositive, it was unnecessary for the BIA to remand his case for consideration of

whether Resureccion’s second counsel provided him with ineffective assistance.

In light of our disposition, we need not address whether Resureccion has

demonstrated sufficient compliance with Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637

(BIA 1988).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### GIZELLA ZONERAICH, M.D. v. OVERLOOK HOSPITAL, ET AL.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*83)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,137
<INVENTORY>                                      4,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,086
<PP&E>                                          10,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,801
<SALES>                                         29,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,893
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (117)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TERRY LOUIS BAILEY.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,276,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,533,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,175,636
<PP&E>                                       9,538,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,922,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,616,754
<BONDS>                                        600,140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,492
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,562,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,992,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,524,488
<CGS>                                          534,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,100,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,781,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,211,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,079,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,079,971
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
Filed 1/24/14 P. v. Trujillo CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

GUILLERMO TRUJILLO,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D063961

 (Super. Ct. No. SCS259700)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Theodore 

M. Weathers, Judge. Affirmed.

Robert Booher, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Guillermo Trujillo was charged by information with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211),1

assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) with an allegation he personally used a 

dangerous or deadly weapon (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(23)), and assault by means likely to 

 

1 Statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2

cause great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4)). The information charged gang 

enhancements as to all counts (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), and alleged a prison prior 

(§§ 667.5, subd. (b), 668), and a strike prior (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, 668). The 

parties entered into a plea bargain; Trujillo pleaded guilty to robbery and admitted the 

gang enhancement allegation in return for a stipulated term of 16 years. Thereafter, he 

was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement. Trujillo subsequently filed a 

notice of appeal challenging the validity of the plea, alleging he was not given all of the 

discovery he requested, but the court denied his request for a certificate of probable 

cause.

Trujillo appeals. We affirm the judgment.

FACTS

Trujillo took the personal property of another with force or fear, and did so for the 

benefit of a criminal street gang.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below. 

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for 

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel identifies as a possible, but not arguable, issue: whether 

Trujillo's plea was constitutionally valid.

We granted Trujillo permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but 

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably 
3

arguable appellate issues. Trujillo has been competently represented by counsel on this 

appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

McDONALD, J.

WE CONCUR:

HALLER, Acting P. J.

McINTYRE, J.
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Pillar Collapses in Underground 

Limestone Mines

William J. Gray, Chief

Roof Control Division

Mine Safety & Health Administration, 

Directorate of Technical Support

Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center 

Pittsburgh, PA

Gray.William@dol.gov

412.386.6301
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

August 2021 Pillar Collapse 

Surface Sinkhole 

Airblast 
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Additional Pillar Collapse Events: 

October and November 2020, July 2021

PA Limestone Mine: Legacy Area

(November 2020, July 2021)

PA Limestone Mine: Newly Benched Area

(October 2020)
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Hazards to Miners

-Ground Fall

Total collapse of the overburden

Rock falls from the roof and ribs

Ejection of rock from collapse area into travelways

-Airblast

Miners in the pathways at risk from high velocity air
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Haul roads and travel roads.

Crushers, shops, explosive 

magazines, and other 

underground infrastructure.

Miners may be exposed in or near:

Airblast Hazards
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Common aspect of all recent collapse events– tall, slender pillars

NIOSH S-Pillar Program
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 

Assessment of “legacy” areas

-Evaluate the likelihood of collapse

-Evaluate the consequence of a 

collapse
Here's how you know.
 **The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites always use a .gov or .mil domain. Before sharing sensitive information online, make sure you’re on a .gov or .mil site by inspecting your browser’s address (or “location”) bar.
 This site is also protected by an SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate that’s been signed by the U.S. government. The https:// means all transmitted data is encrypted  — in other words, any information or browsing history that you provide is transmitted securely.
 National Agricultural LibraryU.S. Department of Agriculture
      

      Secondary Links
          Ask a Question
            Contact Us
            Visit the Library Show Menu
 Home
    About
    Browse Exhibits
    History of the Bureau Advanced Search
 Apron Strings and Kitchen Sinks
 The USDA Bureau of Home Economics


USDA's Kitchen and Farmhouse Design Plans


USDA's Sewing and Pattern Design


USDA’s Historical Time-Use Studies of Homemakers

"Self-Help" Children's Clothing and Standardized Sizing About "Apron Strings and Kitchen Sinks"  The Bureau of Home Economics was a pioneering unit in the U.S. Department of Agriculture for several reasons. It was the first major unit to have been headed by a woman...Read more here.
 Government Links
            Policies and Links
              Plain Writing
              FOIA
              Accessibility Statement
              Privacy Policy
              Non-Discrimination Statement
              Civil Rights Policy
              Information Quality
              National Agricultural Library
              Agricultural Research Service
              USDA.gov
              USA.gov
              WhiteHouse.govSign up for ARS News updates
              Your email address
Other

1854.792