alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40799 Summary Calendar

LANEY J. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus T. WEST, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:94-CV-94

- - - - - - - - - - July 6, 1998 Before GARWOOD, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Laney J. Harris appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant in his employment discrimination suit. Harris argues that he was discriminated against on the bases of race, handicap, and retaliation when he was terminated from his job; that he was required to undergo a physical examination prior to the defendant’s offer of a lower grade job; that he was removed from his job in reprisal for his alleged “whistleblower” activities; and that the defendantNo. 97-40799 -2- violated the prohibition against double jeopardy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 334]


Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific 
Affairs To Notify Foreign Governments of Proposed Hazardous Waste 
Exports Under the Solid Waste Disposal Act

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific 
Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, the authority to approve 
notifications to foreign governments of proposed exports from the 
United States of hazardous waste, as provided under Section 3017 of the 
Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6938.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and 
Resources, and the Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs may 
at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    September 28, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-26380 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin Schott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Date:  August 9, 2005                       By:     /s/ KEVIN SCHOTT
       --------------                          ----------------------------
                                                         Kevin Schott
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**JOHN EDWARD COFFEY**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 140 DB 2016 (No. 82 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 70562** 

**(Montgomery County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20 th**  **day of October, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated October 11, 2016, is ap proved and it is ORDERED**  **that John Edward Coffey, who has been on Administrati ve Suspension, has never been**  **suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he ha s the moral qualifications,**  **competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this Quarterly
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Downey Bridgwater, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                     
|----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 8, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    J. DOWNEY
BRIDGWATER                                                         
|            |  |  |  |     |  | J. Downey Bridgwater President and Chief
Executive Officer Sterling Bancshares, Inc.



37
#### ARMADO CAMPOS v. THE FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission: 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Friday, November 19, 2010.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on November 19, 2010 at 9 a.m. at Brigham 
Hill Community Barn located at 37 Wheeler Road, North Grafton, MA for 
the following reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes
    2. Chairman's Report
    3. Executive Director's Report
    4. Financial Budget
    5. Public Input
    It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from:  Jan 
H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the aforementioned 
address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.

Notice of Full Commission Meeting for the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission

Notice is hereby given, in accordance with section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that the meeting of the Full Commission of the John 
H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission 
will be held on Friday, November 19, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. at Brigham Hill 
Community Barn located at 37 Wheeler Road, North Grafton, MA. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
Resource Management Plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor 
in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

[FR Doc. 2010-26328 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-200923 and 333-200919 on Form S-8 of our
report dated March 6, 2015, relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements and financial statement schedule of KLX Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the basis of presentation of the consolidated and combined financial statements) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KLX Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boca Raton, Florida
March 6, 2015

---



QuickLinks
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 13
- 00350
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF K. J. A. R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Lavaca County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12
- 10
- 22305
- CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal

. We further order this decision certified below for observanc e.
October 24,2013
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1441 KA 10-01434 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN F. KAMINSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered November 5, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request to charge the jury that a witness was an accomplice as a matter of law. We reject that contention.

“An ‘accomplice’ means a witness in a criminal action who, according to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be considered to have participated in . . . [t]he offense charged[] or . . . [a]n offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or conduct [that] constitute the offense charged” (CPL 60.22 [2] [a], [b]; see People v Berger , 52 NY2d 214, 219). “If the undisputed evidence establishes that a witness is an accomplice, the jury must be so instructed but, if different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the proof regarding complicity, according to the statutory definition, the question should be left to the jury for its determination” ( People v Basch , 36 NY2d 154, 157). Here, “different inferences could reasonably be drawn regarding the witness’s complicity in the [burglary]” ( People v Marrero , 272 AD2d 77, 77-78, lv denied 95 NY2d 855), and the court therefore properly submitted the issue to the jury ( see Basch , 36 NY2d at 157-158; People v Green , 225 AD2d 1077, lv denied 88 NY2d 879). In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that the witness was an accomplice whose testimony required corroboration, we conclude that her testimony was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence tending to connect defendant with the commission of the crime ( see generally People v Reome , 15 NY3d 188,-2- 1441 KA 10-01434

191-192; People v Breland , 83 NY2d 286, 292-293).

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### LEON SINGER, PROSECUTOR, v. JACK SCHAPIRO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND JACK SCHAPIRO, TRADING AS MAX SCHAPIRO & SON, AND JACK SCHAPIRO, ANNA SCHAPIRO AND STELLA SCHAPIRO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS MAX SCHAPIRO & SON, AND KLEMMER KALTEISSEN, JUDGE OF THE MIDDLESEX COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, RESPONDENTS.

Argued July 17, 1944

Decided July 28, 1944.

Before Justice Case, sitting alone pursuant to the statute.

For the prosecutor in *certiorari, Gabriel Kirzenbaum.*

For Jack Schapiro, individually, and Jack Schapiro, trading as Max Schapiro & Son, and Jack Schapiro, Anna Schapiro and Stella Schapiro, individually and as co-partners trading as Max Schapiro & Son, respondents in *certiorari, Philip M. Brenner.*

Case, J.

Leon Singer, as plaintiff, brought an action in the Middlesex Court of Common Pleas by attachment against Jack Schapiro, individually, against Jack Schapiro, trading as Max Schapiro & Son, and against Jack Schapiro, Anna Schapiro and Stella Schapiro, individually and as co-partners trading as Max Schapiro & Son, on the ground that the defendants were non-residents of this state. On depositions taken by both parties the court subsequently quashed the writ. It was developed by the depositions that the suit was brought under the act of Congress commonly cited as the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938,” 29 *U. 8. C. A.,*§§ 201, *111*et seq.*The act provided in section 207 (a) (3) that “No employer shall, except as otherwise provided in this section, employ any of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce — (3) for a workweek longer than forty hours after the expiration1 of the second year from such date,” and in section 203 (b) that “ 'Commerce’ means trade, commerce, transportation, transmission, or communication among the several States or from any State to any place outside thereof.”

We may'- assume that the Middlesex Pleas had jurisdiction to entertain appropriate suits under that statute. It remains, however, that the jurisdiction, and indeed the liability sued upon, depends upon the statute. There was no contract, express or implied, to pay the item in litigation. The statute creates a liability, and the suit is to enforce that statutory liability. But the statute, by its terms, applies only to employment in commerce among the states or from a state to a place outside thereof. That sort of commerce is a *sine qua non*of the employee’s right to sue. There is nothing in the proofs by which such employment is shown or from which it may be inferred. I conclude that the writ of attachment was properly quashed.

The writ of *certiorari*is dismissed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q FOR
PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1998             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998             SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                       4,472,803              15,472,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,553,595                 365,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,490,251              16,726,214
<PP&E>                                       3,486,512               2,893,783
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,158,480               1,326,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,898,494              18,293,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          801,716                 663,849
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        76,183                  73,567
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,898,494              18,293,630
<SALES>                                              0                 725,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                 725,374
<CGS>                                                0                 361,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,142,601               4,754,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,146                  82,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,739,455)             (3,888,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,739,455)             (3,888,079)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.77)                   (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.77)                   (.60)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.426

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 179661 dated April 01, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 01, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 25, 2019 No. 749-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1999 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,859,813<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,902,933
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,402,933<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,726,700
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  80,670,668<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,402,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,469,789<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,461,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,447,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,447,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE DUE FROM AFFILIATED COMPANIES.
<F2>AN INVESTMENT IN PREFERRED SHARES OF CHIEFTAIN INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., AT
COST OF $78,500,000 HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN TOTAL ASSETS.
<F3>ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL OF $14,998,000 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK) AND
$60,676,203 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO PREFERRED STOCK) HAS BEEN ADDED TO RETAINED
EARNINGS OF $4,996,465 IN CALCULATING OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.
<F4>REVENUES ARE EARNED EXCLUSIVELY FROM TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION v. HAZEL FRANK GLUCK, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

November 21, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EMELIO NIEBLA.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.