65518 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

with this final notice to grant CSA’s 

expansion application. 

All public documents pertaining to 

the CSA application are available for 

review by contacting the Docket Office, 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Room N–2625, Washington, DC 20210. 

These materials also are available online 

at http://www.regulations.gov under 

Docket No. OSHA–2006–0042. 

Final Decision and Order 

NRTL Program staff examined CSA’s 

application, the comparability analysis, 

and other pertinent information. Based 

on this examination and the analysis, 

OSHA finds that CSA meets the 

requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for 

expansion of its recognition, subject to 

the limitation and conditions specified 

below. Pursuant to the authority in 29 

CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the 

recognition of CSA, subject to this 

limitation and these conditions. 

Limitation 

OSHA limits the expansion of CSA’s 

recognition to testing and certification 

of products for demonstration of 

conformance to the following test 

standards, each of which OSHA 

determines is an appropriate test 

standard, within the meaning of 29 CFR 

1910.7(c): 

UL 498A Current Taps and Adapters 

UL 515 Electrical Resistance Heat 

Tracing for Commercial and Industrial 

Applications 

UL 1673 Electric Space Heating Cables 

UL 1977 Component Connectors for 

Use in Data, Signal, Control and 

Power Applications 

The designations and titles of these test 

standards were current at the time of the 

preparation of this notice. 

OSHA’s recognition of any NRTL for 

a particular test standard is limited to 

equipment or materials (i.e., products) 

for which OSHA standards require 

third-party testing and certification 

before use in the workplace. 

Consequently, if a test standard also 

covers any product for which OSHA 

does not require such testing and 

certification, an NRTL’s scope of 

recognition does not include that 

product. 

The American National Standards 

Institute (ANSI) may approve the test 

standards listed above as an American 

National Standard. However, for 

convenience, we may use the 

designation of the standards-developing 

organization for the standard as opposed 

to the ANSI designation. Under the 

NRTL Program’s policy (see OSHA 

Instruction CPL 1–0.3, Appendix C, 

paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized 

for a particular test standard may use 

either the proprietary version of the test 

standard or the ANSI version of that 

standard. Contact ANSI to determine 

whether a test standard is currently 

ANSI-approved. 

Conditions 

CSA also must abide by the following 

conditions of the recognition, in 

addition to those conditions already 

required by 29 CFR 1910.7: 

1. CSA must allow access to its 

facilities and records to ascertain 

continuing compliance with the terms 

of its recognition, and to perform 

investigations as OSHA deems 

necessary; 

2. If CSA has reason to doubt the 

efficacy of any test standard it is using 

under this program, it must promptly 

inform the test standard-developing 

organization of this concern, and 

provide that organization with 

appropriate relevant information upon 

which its concern is based; 

3. CSA must not engage in, or permit 

others to engage in, any 

misrepresentation of the scope or 

conditions of its recognition. As part of 

this condition, CSA agrees that it will 

allow no representation that it is either 

a recognized or an accredited Nationally 

Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) 

without clearly indicating the specific 

equipment or material to which this 

recognition applies and that its 

recognition is limited to certain 

products; 

4. CSA must inform OSHA as soon as 

possible, in writing, of any change of 

ownership, facilities, or key personnel, 

and of any major changes in its 

operations as an NRTL, including 

details of these changes; 

5. CSA will meet all the terms of its 

recognition and will always comply 

with all OSHA policies pertaining to 

this recognition; and 

6. CSA will continue to meet the 

requirements for recognition in all areas 

to which this recognition applies. 

Authority and Signature 

David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant 

Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, 

directed the preparation of this notice. 

Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this 

notice pursuant to Sections 6(b) and 8(g) 

of the Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655 and 657), 

Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 4–2010 

(75 FR 55355), and 29 CFR part 1911. 

Signed at Washington, DC, on October 20, 

2010. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26887 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of October 4, 2010 

through October 8, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65519 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,568 .......... Scioto Plastics, LLC .............................................................................. Franklin Furnace, OH ................... February 24, 2009. 

73,851 .......... Mueller Steam Specialty, Leased Workers from Staffing Alliance, 

Two Hawk Employment Agency.

St. Pauls, NC ................................ April 5, 2009. 

74,091 .......... Moore Flame Cutting Co ...................................................................... Sterling Heights, MI ...................... April 30, 2009. 

74,145 .......... Briggs and Stratton Corp., EPPG Div., Adecco ................................... Murray, KY .................................... May 22, 2009. 

74,181 .......... Cold Spring Granite Company, Granite Fabrication Division ............... Cold Spring, MN ........................... June 2, 2009. 

74,238 .......... Sitel Operating Corporation, Sitel Worldwide Corporation ................... Winfield, AL ................................... June 2, 2009. 

74,285 .......... Invensys Rail Corp., Safetran Systems Corporation, Ultimate Staffing Rancho Cucamonga, CA .............. June 17, 2009. 

74,542 .......... Reiman Media Group, LLC, Premedia Department ............................. Greendale, WI ............................... August 18, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,548 ................... R.G. Barry Corporation, Corporate Headquarters, Creative Group, Accounts, 

etc.

Pickerington, OH .. February 12, 2009. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65520 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,814 ................... Triumph Aerostructures, LLC, Vought Aircraft, Vought Commercial, Johnson, 

etc.

Grand Prairie, TX March 26, 2009. 

74,150 ................... VMware, IT Applications Group, Subsidiary of EMC ........................................ Palo Alto, CA ........ May 24, 2009. 

74,150A ................ VMware, Global Support Services Team, Subsidiary of EMC ......................... Palo Alto, CA ........ May 24, 2009. 

74,325 ................... ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Films Business Div., Manpower .................. Macedon, NY ........ June 25, 2009. 

74,359 ................... SuperMedia, LLC, Idearc Media, Publishing Operation, TCS, ASEC, OKS .... Everett, WA .......... July 1, 2009. 

74,379 ................... Phoenix Technology Center, Mattel, Inc., Leased Workers of Paradigm ........ Phoenix, AZ .......... July 12, 2009. 

74,418 ................... Husqvarna Outdoor Products, Inc ..................................................................... Texarkana, TX ...... June 30, 2009. 

74,426 ................... International Business Machines (IBM), Division 7T, Enterprise Systems Development.Rochester, MN ..... July 22, 2009. 

74,427 ................... Mattel, Inc., Infrastructure Services, Pro Unlimited, Inc ................................... El Segundo, CA .... July 20, 2009. 

74,514 ................... AstenJohnson, Inc., Leased Workers from SPB and Associates ..................... Clinton, SC ........... August 3, 2009. 

74,539 ................... Harris Corporation, Broadcast Communications Division ................................. Chesapeake, VA .. August 18, 2009. 

74,547 ................... HAVI Logistics, North America, Havi Group, LP, Leased Workers from Office 

Team.

Davis, CA ............. August 11, 2009. 

74,558 ................... United Solar Ovonic .......................................................................................... Auburn Hills, MI .... August 23, 2009. 

74,559 ................... Solo Cup Operating Corporation, Solo Cup Company, Pennmac Staffing ...... Springfield, MO ..... August 24, 2009. 

74,593 ................... Whirlpool Corporation, Career Solutions, TEC Staffing .................................... Fort Smith, AR ...... October 2, 2010. 

74,611 ................... Schneider Electric USA, Volt Workforce Solutions ........................................... Knightdale, NC ..... August 27, 2009. 

74,612 ................... Covidien, Accounts Payable Department, Kelly Services ................................ Mansfield, MA ....... September 8, 2009. 

74,620 ................... AMB Property, L.P., Property Accounting Group ............................................. Boston, MA ........... September 10, 2009. 

74,628 ................... Di-Pro, Inc., Bendix-Spicer/Knorr-Bremse, Select ............................................ Fresno, CA ........... September 9, 2009. 

74,642 ................... Covidien, Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Medical Supplies, Kelly Serv ............... Watertown, NY ..... September 17, 2010. 

74,665 ................... Aegon USA, dba Transamerica Life Insurance Company ................................ Chattanooga, TN .. September 20, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,436 .......... Faurecia Automotive Seating, Troy Technical Center, Reliance One, 

Trialon, EHD, etc.

Troy, MI ......................................... July 6, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,913 .......... VersaLogic Corporation, Leased Workers from Barrett Business Services and Adecco.Eugene, OR ................................... April 12, 2009. 

74,305 .......... Hanesbrands, Inc., Annapolis Drive Facility .......................................... Winston-Salem, NC ....................... June 18, 2009. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,773 .......... V and S Detroit Galvanizing, LLC, Voigt and Schweitzer, LLC Redford, MI 

74,623 .......... Frost Controls, Inc ................................................................................. Smithfield, RI 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,551 .......... Vaughan Furniture Company ................................................................ Galax, VA 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices 65521 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,493 .......... Ananke, Inc ............................................................................................ Providence, RI 

74,291 .......... South Central Workforce Investment Board, Ozark Action, Inc ............ West Plains, MO 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,544 .......... 3M IMTEC .............................................................................................. Ardmore, OK 

74,616 .......... Orbotech, Inc., A workers working on-site at TTM Technologies ......... Redmond, WA 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

in cases where these petitions were not 

filed in accordance with the 

requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every 

petition filed by workers must be signed 

by at least three individuals of the 

petitioning worker group. Petitioners 

separated more than one year prior to 

the date of the petition cannot be 

covered under a certification of a 

petition under Section 223(b), and 

therefore, may not be part of a 

petitioning worker group. For one or 

more of these reasons, these petitions 

were deemed invalid. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,488 .......... Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) ................................................ Newark, DE 

74,496 .......... Hallmark Cards, Inc ............................................................................... Kansas City, MO 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,103 .......... WellPoint, Inc., Doing business as Blue Cross/Blue Shield ................. Denver, CO 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of October 4, 

2010 through October 8, 2010. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: October 15, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26768 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0041] 

FM Approvals; Expansion of 

Recognition 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration’s final decision 

expanding the recognition of FM 

Approvals LLC as a Nationally 

Recognized Testing Laboratory under 29 

CFR 1910.7. 

DATES: The expansion of recognition 

becomes effective on October 25, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of 

Technical Programs and Coordination 

Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational 

Safety and Health Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Room N–3655, 

Washington, DC 20210, or phone (202) 

693–2110. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Notice of Final Decision 

The Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA) hereby gives 

notice that it is expanding the 

recognition of FM Approvals LLC (FM) 

as a Nationally Recognized Testing 

Laboratory (NRTL). FM’s expansion 

covers the use of additional test 

standards. OSHA’s current scope of 

recognition for FM may be found in the 

following informational Web page: 

http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/

fm.html. 

OSHA recognition of an NRTL 

signifies that the organization meets the 

legal requirements specified in 29 CFR 

1910.7. Recognition is an 

acknowledgment that the organization 

can perform independent safety testing 

and certification of the specific products 

covered within its scope of recognition, 

and is not a delegation or grant of 

government authority. As a result of 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES