alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



RF MONOLITHICS, INC.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 13th day of January, 2006.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName: Harley E Barnes IIITitle: Chief Financial Officer




*A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|     1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|     2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date: May 17, 2010                                                                                                           |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                         |   |   |
| /s/ Greggory Schneider                  |   |   |
| Greggory Schneider                                                                                                           |   |   |
| Director, Chief Financial and Principal Financial Officer                                                                    |   |   |
|                                                                                                                         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DATA RACE,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      343
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,142
<PP&E>                                           4,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,687)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,606
<COMMON>                                        36,059
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,252)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,548
<SALES>                                            911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   911
<CGS>                                              599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board (EAB).                    

*Topic:*                         The EAB will discuss national considerations related to ecosystem restoration through integrated water resources management with emphasis on long-term recovery in the Gulf of Mexico, sea level rise in south Florida, and progress and status of South Florida ecosystem restoration.                    

*Date of Meeting:*                         October 29, 2010.                    

*Place:*                         The Westin Colonnade, 180 Aragon Avenue, Coral Gables, Florida 33134.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

Thirty minutes will be set aside for public comment. Members of the public who wish to speak are asked to register prior to the start of the meeting. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. Statements are limited to 3 minutes.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Rennie Sherman, Executive Secretary,                         *rennie.h.sherman@usace.army.mil,*                         202-761-7771.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The EAB advises the Chief of Engineers by providing expert and independent advice on environmental issues facing the Corps of Engineers. The public meeting will include discussion between the EAB and the Chief of Engineers and may include presentations related to the topics of discussion. The meeting is open to the public, and public comment is tentatively scheduled for 30 minutes beginning at 11:15.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-25988 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.31




SUMMARY OF STEELCASE BENEFIT PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS


The Steelcase Benefit Plan for Outside Directors (“Director Plan”) became effective on March 1, 1999. The Director Plan was created to provide health and welfare benefits to members of the Board of Directors of Steelcase Inc. (the “Company”) who are not Company employees or retirees (“Outside Directors”).  
Eligibility: Outside Directors and their eligible dependents are eligible for coverage under the Director Plan on the first day of the Outside Director’s term as a board member. During an annual enrollment period, Outside Directors who are already enrolled in coverage may opt out of coverage or change plans. An Outside Director who does not enroll at the time of becoming a board member is eligible during a subsequent annual enrollment period and also has special enrollment rights when other existing coverage is lost or when there is a qualified change in status. 
Retiree coverage:  Outside Directors who became members of the board before July 22, 2002, are covered under the Director Plan at the time of leaving the Board, and meet the Rule of 80, are eligible for retiree coverage under the applicable Company retiree plan.  Rule of 80 means that attained age and full years of continuous service upon retirement equals 80 or more.  Years of service for Outside Directors includes years of service as an employee of the Company and years of service as an Outside Director, to the extent the two periods are not overlapping. 
Benefits: The Director Plan provides medical, dental and vision benefits. 
Cost: Outside Directors pay the full cost of coverage under the Director Plan for Outside Directors and their eligible dependents. The Company subsidizes a portion of the premium costs for retired Outside Directors who are eligible for retiree coverage. The premium costs paid by the Company on behalf of a retired Outside Director are treated as taxable income to the retired Outside Director and reported annually on Form 1099. 
Last updated: January 15, 2020; Effective as of February 29, 2020
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, L. George
Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    L. GEORGE
KLAUS       
|    |  | L. George Klaus              
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



I, Michael A. Piraino, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL A.
PIRAINO   
|    |  | Michael A. Piraino          
|    |  | Executive Vice President and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|    |  | (Principal Financial and    
|    |  | Accounting Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEWIS SMITH.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### LAURENCE C. MUENTZ AND DIANE K. MUENTZ, HIS WIFE v. DAVID S. GEMMELL, AND COLLEEN M. GEMMELL, HIS WIFE.

November 17, 1987.

This matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;

*496It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed. (See 107 *N.J.*652).
#### In re: Richard L. BARNETT, Sr., Debtor. Richard L. Barnett, Sr., Appellant, v. Paul Eagleson, et al., Appellee. In re: Richard L. Barnett, Sr., Debtor. Paul Eagleson, et al., Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard L. Barnett, Sr., Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 99-15858, 99-15859.

BAP No. EC-98-01497-JRyPa.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 12, 2000.

Decided Jan. 3, 2001.

Before B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1

We affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the reasons given in its opinion of March 22, 1999.

1

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *628courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Sitemap

## December 28, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 12
- December 28, 2010

            - Fisheye Stereo from Edge of ‘Santa Maria’ Crater, Sol 2459
            - Fisheye from Edge of ‘Santa Maria’ Crater, Sol 2459 (Right Eye)
            - City Lights
            - Cassini Celebrates 10 Years Since Jupiter Encounter
            - Aurora Over Finland, Dec. 28, 2010
1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United Stat es District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-2106

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Bryan R. Dunn, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 16, 2011 Filed: October 4, 2011

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bryan Dunn appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we reject Dunn’s arguments on appeal, and we conclude that the revocation sentence of 12 months in prison with 19 months of supervised release was not unreasonable, seeUnited States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we a ffirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
# Sitemap

## October 19, 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- 10
- October 19, 2023

            - 30 Years Ago: The STS-58 Spacelab Life Sciences-2 Mission
            - Public Invited to International Observe the Moon Night Oct. 21
            - NASA’s Lucy Spacecraft Preparing for its First Asteroid Flyby
            - The Moon Casts a Shadow
            - NASA’s Innovative Rocket Nozzle Paves Way for Deep Space Missions
            - Watch Live as NASA Astronauts Conduct Spacewalk, Upgrade Space Station
            - Meet Tracy Hudspeth: Communications Specialist at NASA Office of Small Business Programs
            - Metrics
            - NASA’s Webb Discovers New Feature in Jupiter’s Atmosphere
            - First Artemis Crew Trains for Mission Around Moon
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL MICHAEL ATHENS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE ST ATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00195

- CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20150D01963 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observ ance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,009
<SECURITIES>                                        81
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,044
<INVENTORY>                                     38,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,455
<PP&E>                                          92,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,280
<BONDS>                                         67,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     46,558
<COMMON>                                       377,364
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,236)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,852
<SALES>                                        513,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               513,844
<CGS>                                          343,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  343,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,704
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,974)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)


</TABLE>
#### HARRIET DROSOS AND DIMITRIOV DROSOS, ETC. v. R.H. MACY & CO., INC.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.109





Fourth Amendment to the
DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan
(Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)


Recitals


A.    DTE Energy Company (the “Company”) adopted the DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005) (the “Plan”) to enable the Company to attract and retain executives.


B.    The Organization and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors is authorized to amend the Plan.


C.    By a resolution properly adopted on March 23, 2020, the Committee amends the Plan to provide additional benefits to an executive officer of the Company.


Plan Amendment


The DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005) is amended as follows:


1.    Effective May 3, 2020, Section 2.20 is amended to read as follows:


2.20.    “Frozen MSBP Participant’s Benefit” means the value of the Participant’s MSBP benefit. Such benefit shall be calculated in accordance with section 5.01.  Except as provided in Section 5.01(f), in order to receive this benefit the Participant must have attained age 55 and have completed at least 10 years of Company service upon termination, retirement, disability or death.


2.    Effective May 3, 2020, new Section 5.01(f) is added as follows:


5.01.    Grandfathered and Frozen MSBP Participant’s MSBP Benefit


(f)    This Section 5.01(f) supersedes any conflicting provision in the Plan, including but not limited to Appendix A.  Peter Oleksiak is not required to have attained age 55 upon termination to receive his MSBP benefit.  The MSBP benefit of Peter Oleksiak will be calculated as of May 3, 2020 based on Management Group 2 status, age 55, and 22 years and 11 months of service.
 
DTE Energy Company has caused this Fourth Amendment to be executed on the 23rd day of March, 2020.


DTE ENERGY COMPANY






By:  /s/Diane M. Antishin            







Diane M. Antishin
Vice President, Human Resources Operations
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7275 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the admissibility 

and deportability of aliens acting in accordance with State and foreign 

marijuana laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2018 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

the admissibility and deportability of aliens acting in 

accordance with State and foreign marijuana laws, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maintaining Appro5 priate Protections for Legal Entry Act of 2018’’ or the 

6 ‘‘MAPLE Act of 2018’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7275 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADMISSIBILITY OF ALIENS ACTING IN ACCORDANCE 

2 WITH STATE AND FOREIGN MARIJUANA 

3 LAWS. 

4 Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)(II), by inserting 

7 after the comma at the end the following: ‘‘except in 

8 the case of a law or regulation of the United States 

9 related to marijuana, which conduct was lawful in 

10 the State, Indian Tribe, or foreign country in which 

11 the conduct occurred, or a law or regulation of a 

12 State, Indian Tribe, or foreign country related to 

13 marijuana, which conduct was subsequently made 

14 lawful under the law or regulation of such jurisdic15 tion,’’; and 

16 (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by inserting after 

17 ‘‘endeavored to do so’’ the following: ‘‘, except with 

18 respect to trafficking, sale, or distribution of mari19 juana if the conduct was lawful or subsequently 

20 made lawful in the State, Indian Tribe, or foreign 

21 country in which it occurred’’. 

22 SEC. 3. DEPORTABILITY OF ALIENS ACTING IN ACCORD23 ANCE WITH STATE AND FOREIGN MARIJUANA 

24 LAWS. 

25 Section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Na26 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 7275 IH

1 inserting after ‘‘marijuana’’ the following: ‘‘, an offense 

2 under a law or regulation of the United States related to 

3 marijuana, which conduct was lawful in the State, Indian 

4 Tribe, or foreign country in which the conduct occurred, 

5 or an offense under a law or regulation of a State, Indian 

6 Tribe, or foreign country related to marijuana, which con7 duct was subsequently made lawful under the law or regu8 lation of such jurisdiction’’. 

9 SEC. 4. AGGRAVATED FELONY. 

10 Section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Na11 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(B)) is amended by in12 serting before the semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, 

13 except with respect to trafficking, sale, or distribution of 

14 marijuana if the conduct was lawful or subsequently made 

15 lawful in the State, Indian Tribe, or foreign country in 

16 which it occurred’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS