Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Notices 65323 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9216–7] 

Proposed Administrative Settlement 

Agreement Under Section 122 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act for the Crown Vantage Landfill 

Superfund Site Located in Alexandria 

Township, Hunterdon County, NJ. 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed 

administrative settlement and 

opportunity for public comment. 

SUMMARY: The United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’) is proposing to enter into an 

administrative settlement agreement 

(‘‘Settlement Agreement’’) with GeorgiaPacific Consumer Products, LP and 

International Paper Company 

(collectively ‘‘Settling Parties’’) pursuant 

to Section 122 of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622. The 

Settlement Agreement provides for 

Settling Parties’ payment of certain 

response costs incurred by EPA at the 

Crown Vantage Landfill Superfund Site 

located in Alexandria Township, 

Hunterdon County, New Jersey. 

In accordance with Section 122(i) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), this notice 

is being published to inform the public 

of the proposed Settlement Agreement 

and of the opportunity to comment. For 

thirty (30) days following the date of 

publication of this notice, EPA will 

receive written comments relating to the 

proposed Settlement Agreement. EPA 

will consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations that 

indicate that the proposed settlement is 

inappropriate, improper or inadequate. 

EPA’s response to any comments 

received will be available for public 

inspection at EPA Region 2, 290 

Broadway, 17th floor, New York, New 

York 10007–1866. 

DATES: Comments must be provided by 

November 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference 

the Crown Vantage Landfill Superfund 

Site, EPA Index No. 02–2010–2021 and 

should be sent to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Regional Counsel, New Jersey 

Superfund Branch, 290 Broadway, 17th 

Floor, New York, NY 10007. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A copy of 

the proposed administrative settlement, 

as well as background information 

relating to the settlement, may be 

obtained from Elizabeth La Blanc, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, New Jersey 

Superfund Branch, Office of Regional 

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 17th Floor, 290 Broadway, New 

York, New York 10007–1866. 

Telephone: 212–637–3106. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth La Blanc, Assistant Regional 

Counsel, New Jersey Superfund Branch, 

Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 17th 

Floor, 290 Broadway, New York, New 

York 10007–1866. Telephone: 212–637– 

3106. 

Dated: September 29, 2010. 

Walter Mugdan, 

Director, Emergency and Remedial Response 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26735 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[MB Docket No. 10–204; DA 10–1918] 

The Tennis Channel, Inc. v. Comcast 

Cable Communications, LLC; File No. 

CSR–8258–P 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This document designates a 

program carriage complaint for hearing 

before an Administrative Law Judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) to resolve the factual disputes 

and to return an Initial Decision. 

DATES: The Tennis Channel, Inc. (‘‘The 

Tennis Channel’’) and Comcast Cable 

Communications, LLC (‘‘Comcast’’) shall 

each file with the Chief, Enforcement 

Bureau and Chief ALJ, by October 15, 

2010, its respective elections as to 

whether it wishes to proceed to 

Alternative Dispute Resolution (‘‘ADR’’). 

The hearing proceeding is suspended 

during this time. If one or both of the 

parties do not elect ADR, then the 

hearing proceeding will commence on 

October 18, 2010. In order to avail itself 

of the opportunity to be heard, The 

Tennis Channel and Comcast, in person 

or by their attorneys, shall each file with 

the Commission, by October 22, 2010, a 

written appearance stating that it will 

appear on the date fixed for hearing and 

present evidence on the issues specified 

herein. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information on this 

proceeding, contact David Konczal, 

David.Konczal@fcc.gov, of the Media 

Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418– 

2120. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Hearing Designation 

Order and Notice of Opportunity for 

Hearing for Forfeiture, DA 10–1918, 

adopted and released on October 5, 

2010. The full text of this document is 

available for public inspection and 

copying during regular business hours 

in the FCC Reference Center, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC 

20554. This document will also be 

available via ECFS (http://www.fcc.gov/ 

cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available 

electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/ 

or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text 

may be purchased from the 

Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554. To request this 

document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an e-mail 

to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Commission’s Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). 

Synopsis of the Order 

I. Introduction 

1. By this Hearing Designation Order 

and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing 

for Forfeiture (‘‘Order’’), the Chief, Media 

Bureau (‘‘Bureau’’), pursuant to 

delegated authority, hereby designates 

for hearing before an ALJ the abovecaptioned program carriage complaint 

filed by The Tennis Channel against 

Comcast. The complaint alleges that 

Comcast, a vertically integrated 

multichannel video programming 

distributor (‘‘MVPD’’), discriminated 

against The Tennis Channel, a video 

programming vendor, on the basis of 

affiliation, with the effect of 

unreasonably restraining The Tennis 

Channel’s ability to compete fairly, in 

violation of Section 616(a)(3) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), and Section 

76.1301(c) of the Commission’s Rules. 

47 U.S.C. 536(a)(3); 47 CFR 76.1301(c). 

The complaint arises from Comcast’s 

denial of The Tennis Channel’s request 

to be repositioned from a premium 

sports tier to a more broadly distributed 

programming tier. 

2. After reviewing The Tennis 

Channel’s complaint, we find that The 

Tennis Channel has put forth sufficient 

evidence supporting the elements of its 

program carriage discrimination claim 

to establish a prima facie case. Below, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES