alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00923-CR

———————————

JUAN ROJAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1448037

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After a jury trial, Juan Rojas was found guilty of the offense of family violence 

assault and was sentenced to 42 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Institutional Division. Rojas timely filed a notice of appeal.
2

Rojas’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along 

with a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error and the appeal is

without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396 (1967). 

Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal 

authority. 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 

807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel indicates that she has thoroughly 

reviewed the record and is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant 

reversal. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State, 193 

S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

Counsel states that she provided Rojas access to a copy of the record. His pro 

se response to counsel’s Anders brief was due on June 20, 2016. Rojas filed no 

response and requested no extension of time to file a response.

We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we 

conclude that no reversible error exists in the record, there are no arguable grounds 

for review, and the appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 

1400 (emphasizing that reviewing court—and not counsel—determines, after full 

examination of proceedings, whether appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State, 

300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine 
3

whether arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–

27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (same); Mitchell, 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court 

determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record). We note 

that an appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for 

appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n.6.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw.1 Attorney Deborah Summers must immediately send Rojas the required 

notice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

6.5(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal 

and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-4-000; Docket No. PR11-5-000; Not Consolidated]


Enterprise Alabama Intrastate, LLC; Enterprise Intrastate L.P; 
Notice of Baseline Filings

October 18, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 15, 2010, the applicants listed above 
submitted a revised baseline filing of their Statement of Operating 
Conditions for services provided under section 311 of the Natural Gas 
Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6c6f786965444643444f795f5a5a45585e6a4c4f5849044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8bebdaabbb7969491969dab8d8888978a8cb89e9d8a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, October 25, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26824 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Sitemap

## January 1986

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1986
- January 1986

            - 01
            - 16
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1075 

Expressing support for designation of the week of September 23 through 

September 29, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Ms. JENKINS of Kansas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the week of September 

23 through September 29, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star Families 

Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the last Sunday in September— 

(1) is designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s Day’’ 

under section 111 of title 36, United States Code; and 

(2) was first designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s 

Day’’ under the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in September as ‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’, and for other purposes’’, approved 

June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895); 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1075 IH 

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the 

loss of a loved one who died in service to the United 

States; 

Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in 

the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, 

through their service, bear the burden of protecting the 

freedom of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those individuals, inspires 

all individuals in the United States to sacrifice and work 

diligently for the good of United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

of the Armed Forces and the families of veterans of the 

Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Families Remembrance Week’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

5 by the families of members of the Armed Forces who 

6 have made the ultimate sacrifice in order to defend 

7 freedom and protect the United States and by the 

8 families of veterans of the Armed Forces; and 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Week 

11 by— 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1075 IH 

1 (A) performing acts of service and good 

2 will in their communities; and 

3 (B) celebrating families in which loved 

4 ones have made the ultimate sacrifice so that 

5 others could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and 

6 the pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      29,261,749
<SECURITIES>                                     5,767
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,181,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    957,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,395,358
<PP&E>                                     300,771,256
<DEPRECIATION>                              49,235,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             367,023,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,004,730
<BONDS>                                    256,042,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       356,371
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,353,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               367,023,460
<SALES>                                    131,738,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           131,738,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              123,813,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (996,604)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,749,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,828,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,935,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,924,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,893,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10467

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ESPARZA-MONTANES, also known as Oscar Herrera-Herrera, also

known as Oscar Rivera, also known as Javier Lopez-Ortega,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-163-1

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Esparza-Montanes (Esparza) appeals the 60-month sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation.

Esparza challenges the district court’s decision to depart upward from criminal

history category VI pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, arguing that the district court

failed to explain why it bypassed intermediate offense levels or state what

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 23, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-10467 Document: 00511033323 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2010
No. 09-10467

2

offense level or guidelines range it found to be appropriate and thus failed to

follow § 4A1.3(a)(4)(B).

Esparza’s objections below did not preserve the errors he raises on appeal.

Cf. United States v. Neal, 578 F.3d 270, 272-73 (5th Cir. 2009); FED. R. CRIM.

P. 51(b). Esparza does not argue, and there is nothing in the record to show,

that had the district court expressly applied the incremental approach, it could

not have imposed the same sentence or that Esparza would have received a

lesser sentence. See United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430, 438 (5th Cir. 2006).

Thus, Esparza’s substantial rights were not affected. See Puckett v. United

States, 129 S. Ct. 1423, 1429 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-10467 Document: 00511033323 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00602-CV

Christopher John LOCASCIO, Matthew Locascio, Remy John Locascio and Sara Locascio,

Appellants

v.

Charles LOCASCIO,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-19983

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 16, 2019, the trial court clerk notified this court that the clerk’s record was 

not filed when it was originally due because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to 

pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without 

paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court 

within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or 

arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without 

paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
# Sitemap

## June 06, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 06
- June 06, 2016

            - NASA Awards Grants to Two Universities for STEM Education Programs
            - Fires in Angola, Zambia, Democratic Republic of the Congo
            - NASA’s Operation IceBridge Completes 2016 Arctic Spring Campaign
            - NASA Sees Mormon and Juniper Fires in Arizona
            - NASA Glenn Names Veteran Engineer as Deputy Director
            - Space Station View of Noctilucent Clouds
            - Rings Interrupted
            - Bonnie (was TD2/91L) – North Atlantic Ocean
            - Amendment 15: A.23 releasing Weather and Atmospheric Dynamics
            - Sols 1364-1365: Analyzing drill sample
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,587
<SECURITIES>                                     2,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,624
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,188
<PP&E>                                          59,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,474
<BONDS>                                            295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,142
<SALES>                                         41,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
# *Printer Friendly Adverse Action Articles*

**These articles were written for a report submitted to Congress in 2016. Some aspects of the law may have changed in the intervening years. Readers are strongly encouraged to consult updated statutes, regulations, and case law.**

- A Primer in Pieces
-  Second-Hand News Can be Misleading
- The Adverse Action Process - A Flowchart
- Performance-Based Actions under Chapters 43 and 75 of Title 5 - Similarities and Differences
- Different Types of Adverse Actions Use Different Rules
- Legal Sources for the Right to Notice and a Meaningful Opportunity to Reply
- Decision-Maker Must Listen and Have Power to Decide
- Connecting the Job and the Offense ("Nexus")
- Labels are Not Required, but if Used They Must be Proven
- Determining the Penalty
-  How Employees Become Similarly Situated for Purposes of an Adverse Action Penalty 
-  Avoid Facilitating Prohibited Personnel Practices (PPPs)
-  Agency Officials' Substantive and Procedural Errors and How to Fix Them
-  Identifying Probationers and Their Rights
- The Limited Powers of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
- Why Federal Employees Have the Right to a Hearing
- How a Hearing is Conducted
- Implementing or Challenging Initial Decisions
- Additional Resources
- Adverse Actions: A Compilation of Articles  (complete report)
1 min read

# Risk of Performance Decrement and Crew Illness Due to Inadequate Food and Nutrition

### Robert E. Lewis

#### Web Community Manager

Mar 20, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

## Contents

              -  Directed Acyclic Graph Files 
              -  Human Research Program 

Nutrition has been critical in every era of exploration on Earth, from the time when scurvy plagued seafarers to the last century when polar explorers died from malnutrition or, in some cases, nutrient toxicities.

The space food system must provide food that is safe, nutritious, and acceptable to the crew to maintain crew health and performance during space flight.  Standards/controls exist to maintain food safety during spaceflight.  Adequate nutrition and safe food have been demonstrated for 6-month missions and limited 1-year missions. Achieving and maintaining food system acceptability, nutrition, and safety for long-duration space flight with limited resupply is complex and influenced by factors such as duration isolated from Earth, menu development, suitability in microgravity, palatability, packaging, and stowage.

## Directed Acyclic Graph Files

+ DAG File Information (HSRB Home Page)

+ Food and Nutrition Risk DAG and Narrative (PDF)

+ Food and Nutrition Risk DAG Code (TXT)

## Human Research Program

+ Risk of Performance Decrement and Crew Illness Due to Inadequate Food and Nutrition

Multiple Evidence Reports are available for this Risk. Please see the relevant section on the Human Research Roadmap Evidence page for all of the Evidence Reports

Human System Risks

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

Johnson Space Center

## Related Terms

                - Human Health and Performance

## Explore More

1 min readRisk of Performance Decrements and Adverse Health Outcomes Resulting from Sleep Loss, Circadian Desynchronization, and Work OverloadArticle										1 year ago									

1 min readRisk of Radiation CarcinogenesisArticle										1 year ago									

1 min readRisk of Reduced Crew Health and Performance Due to HypoxiaArticle										1 year ago									

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Humans In Space

Missions

International Space Station

Solar System
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,587
<SECURITIES>                                     2,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,408
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,151
<PP&E>                                          59,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,474
<BONDS>                                            295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,358
<SALES>                                         41,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,861)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>