alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# jf**ourtlj Court** **of Antonio,** **QPexafl April** **29,2014 No.** **04-13-00480-CR William** **Charles Webb.** **Appellanl v.** 

### The**Stale of** **Texas, Appellee** **Trial Court** **Case No.** **2012-675-C2**

### ORDER**The Court has** **reviewed the** **record and** **briefs in** **this appeal** **and has** **determined that** **oral argument** **will not** **significantly aid** **it in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See TEX.** **R. App.** **P. 39.8.** **Therefore, all** **requests for** **oral argument** **are denied,** **and the** **cause is** **advanced for** **ON BRIEFS** **submission on** **June 3.** **2014, to** **the following** **panel: Chief** **Justice Stone.** **Justice Barnard,** **and Justice** **Chapa. All** **parties will** **be notified** **of the** **Court's decision** **in this appeal** **in accordance** **with TEX.** **R. API1.** **P. 48.** **Either parly** **may file** **motion requesting** **the Court** **to reconsider Us** **determination that** **oral argumeni** **will not** **significantly aid** **the Court** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues presented** **in the** **appeal. See** **TEX. R.** **Al'P. l\** **39.8. Such** **motion should be** **filed within** **ten (10)** **days from the** **date of** **this order.** **It is** **so ORDERED** **on April** **29. 2014.** **Catherine Stone.** **Chief Justice** 

# IN**WITNESS WHEREOF,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **a/fixed the** **seal o/thc** **said court** **on this** **April 29.** **2014.**
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Atul Sabharwal, Chief Executive Officer of Snipp Interactive Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2015





/s/  Atul Sabharwal

Atul Sabharwal,

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS
CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trico Marine Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 11, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Geoff JonesGeoff JonesChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-13-1999
<CASH>                                             115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      355
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                      1,412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,201
<PP&E>                                           3,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                     386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,086
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,912
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,019)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,366
<SALES>                                          1,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,443
<CGS>                                            1,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
| Sputnik Home

Background History

Bibliography

Biographies

Chronology

Documents

Explorer

The International Geophysical Year

Photo Gallery

Vanguard |  | Sputnik

 Explorer

 Vanguard
For further information, please email histinfo@hq.nasa.gov
Updated February 2, 2005 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H. Res. 1071 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 26, 2018. 

Whereas voting is fundamental to a functioning democracy; 

Whereas the Constitution prohibits discrimination in voting 

based on race, sex, poll taxes, and age; 

Whereas it is of paramount importance that the United 

States maintains the legitimacy of its elections and protects them from interference, including interference from 

foreign threats and illegal voting; 

Whereas the city of San Francisco, California, is allowing 

non-citizens, including illegal immigrants, to register to 

vote in school board elections; and 

Whereas Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in 

elections for Federal office: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

that allowing illegal immigrants the right to vote devalues the 

franchise and diminishes the voting power of United States 

citizens. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS5 Mortgage Trust (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Actperiodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicercompliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asMaster Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, ComputershareTrust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCertificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 10, 2023

 

 

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HARVEY GEAN EMERSON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 1 50

- CR

Appeal from the

422 nd District Court

of Kaufman County, Texas

(TC# 32044

- 422 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until October 13 , 2015

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Lara Elizabeth Bracamonte

, the Appellant ’ s

Attorney

, prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October

13 , 2015

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of September , 2015

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes , JJ.
# Sitemap

## July 29, 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- 07
- July 29, 2016

            - NASA Marches on with Test of RS-25 Engine for New Space Launch System
            - NASA Announces Changes to International Space Station Coverage
            - NASA Orders Second SpaceX Crew Mission to International Space Station
            - White Sands National Monument, New Mexico
            - Smoke and Fires in Eastern China
            - U.S. Navy to Conduct Turboprop Aircraft Carrier Operations at Wallops
            - Space Station View of the Chesapeake Bay
            - In Case You Missed It: A Weekly Summary of Top Content from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
            - Fires in the Northwest Territories of Canada
            - NASA Sees Intense Fires around the World
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WARD BROWN.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,075
<PP&E>                                              44,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                      40,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  140
<BONDS>                                              5,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                             360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5,900
<SALES>                                                806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       806
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        191
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### MONA BRACCO, AND VICTOR BRACCO, HER HUSBAND, RESPONDENTS, v. PATERSON MORTGAGE AND REALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Submitted October 2, 1944

Decided January 16, 1945.

Before Justices Pabkeb and Colie.

For the appellant, *Cyril J. Galvin.*

For the respondents, *Salvatore I). Viviano.*

Peb Cubiam.

This is an accident ease. The claim is for personal injury to a married woman, her husband joining his claim *per quod.*The circumstances of the accident are unusual but not complicated. Plaintiffs were tenants of one of the apartments in a house owned by appellant, directly under the roof, which was leaky and admitted the rain to their rooms. They complained to defendant, and a representative of defendant went to the house together with an employee of a roofing company to inspect the roof, with a view to repairs. The two went on the roof, and in the course of inspection the roofing man climbed an adjoining sloping roof, slipped and slid down the sloping roof, and in some way, bricks from a chimney fell and broke through the roof, and fragments of ceiling fell on the woman’s head. There was a prior suit against both companies, which was withdrawn, and the present action is against the realty company alone. There was a judgment of $400 for the wife and $100 for the husband.

The grounds of appeal are three in number. The first alleges general error, and of course is ineffectual. The third alleges error in denying a direction of verdict: but there was no jury. The second, denial of motion to nonsuit, is alone cognizable; but we think is without merit. As we view the *422case, it is clearly within the rule laid down by the Court of Errors and Appeals in *Perry*v. *Levy,*87 *N. J. L.*670, and *Siggins*v. *McGill,*72 *Id.*263. At the very least there was a question of fact as regards negligence of the landlord, either in permitting the chimney, which was under its control, to be in such a dilapidated condition as that bricks would fall therefrom on the roof, or in maintaining the roof in such condition that falling bricks would penetrate, to and through the ceiling of the upper floor over the head of the plaintiff.

The judgment will be affirmed.
# Sitemap

## September 17, 2014

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2014
- 09
- September 17, 2014

            - U.S. Secretary of Education Brings Back-To-School Bus Tour To Rocket City, U.S.A.
            - U.S. Secretary of Education Brings Back-To-School Bus Tour To Rocket City, U.S.A.
            - Two Views of an X-Class Flare on Sept. 10, 2014
            - NASA Seeks America’s Best and Brightest for Space Technology Research Fellowships
            - Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 911’s Final Journey
            - NASA Mars Spacecraft Ready for Sept. 21 Orbit Insertion
            - ER-2 High-Altitude Airborne Science Aircraft
            - Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 911’s Final Journey
            - Hubble Helps Find Smallest Known Galaxy Containing a Supermassive Black Hole
            - U.S. Secretary of Education Brings Back-To-School Bus Tour To Rocket City
EX-10.16.1





 Exhibit 10.16.1 

THE FRESH MARKET HOLDINGS, INC. 

c/o Apollo Management VIII, L.P. 

9 West 57th Street 
 New
York, NY 10019 
 September 24, 2021 
 James Heaney

 Re: Amendment of Option (Grant Date: September 3, 2020) 

Dear Jim: 
 This letter (the “Amendment”) is
entered into to modify the terms of the Option granted to you pursuant to that certain Grant Letter, dated September 4, 2020, by and between The Fresh Market Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Pomegranate Parent Holdings, Inc.) (the
“Company”) and you (the “Grant Letter”). The Option was granted pursuant to the Company’s Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), and the Option and underlying Shares are subject in all respects to the
provisions of the Plan. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in the text are defined in the Plan. 
  

	1.	 Amendment to Grant Letter. Pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan, the Grant Letter is hereby amended
as follows: 


  

	 	•	 	 Section 2 (Vesting) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 



“The Option shall vest upon, and only upon, a Change in Control that occurs before April 16, 2022.” 

 

	 	•	 	 Section 4 (Termination of the Option) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 “The Option shall terminate on the earliest of (i) April 16, 2022 if no Change in Control has occurred
prior to such date, (ii) the seventh anniversary of the Grant Date set forth above, and (iii) cancellation, termination or expiration of the Option pursuant to action taken by the Committee in accordance with Section 7 of the
Plan.” 
  

	2.	 Miscellaneous. The Grant Letter, as modified by this Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect,
and nothing herein contained shall be construed as a waiver or modification of existing rights under the Grant Letter, except as such rights are expressly modified hereby. 



Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment by signing and returning a copy of this letter. 

Sincerely, 
  

			
	THE FRESH MARKET HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jason Potter
	Name:	 	Jason Potter
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
		
		 	 /s/ James Heaney

	Name:	 	James Heaney
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEE ADELMAN.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 15,283.

#### The State, ex rel. Snoke et al., *v.*Blue, Trustee.

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

Filed March 13, 1890.

*L. T. Michener,*Attorney General, *J. Morris, J. M. Barrett, A. G. Wood, S. Glaypool, W. A. Ketcham, J. S. Duncan, G. W. Smith*and *J. H. Qilleit,*for appellants.

*W. P. Fishhach, A. G. Harris, E. Haymond*and *L. W. Royse,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

Reversed upon the authority of *State, ex rel.,*v. *Haworth, ante,*p. 462.

Berkshire, J.,

dissents for the reason given in *State, ex rel.,*v. *Haioorth, supra.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146623

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146623

COA: 304161

Wayne CC: 10-010578-FH

ATKINSON JACKSON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of National Storage Affiliates Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arlen D. Nordhagen, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Tamara D. Fischer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 16, 2018





By:/s/ Arlen D. NordhagenArlen D. NordhagenChairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer


By:/s/ Tamara D. FischerTamara D. FischerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TEOFILO AYALA.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
1 min read

# Machining And Fabrication

### NASA Communications

Oct 14, 2023

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

White Sands Test Facility’s Machining and Fabrication craftsmen specialize in the prototype and production of parts used on the International Space Station, ground support equipment, and facility and test hardware. 

We combine high-end Computer Numerical Control (CNC) precision machining and welding with experienced personnel and advanced inspection techniques and equipment to deliver the highest quality components to aerospace, defense and other commercial industries.

Our fabrication team is skilled in working with many ferrous and non-ferrous metals including stainless steel, aluminum, and brass. We have expertise working with exotic metals like Monel®, Inconel®, Kovar®, titanium, carbon, and alloy steels.