alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.383

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 173165 dated March 28, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

Cable radio services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 

(Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until March 28, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated March 28, 2019 No. 189-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
# $122 Million Allocated for Post-Hurricane Ida Repairs to Grand Isle

NEW ORLEANS – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA), will undertake $122 million in work to address Hurricane Ida-related damage to the Grand Isle Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction Project.

“Congress has made a significant commitment to address the damages experienced from back-to-back record hurricane seasons,” said Col. Stephen Murphy, commander of the USACE New Orleans District. “We are eager to work in partnership with CPRA to deliver this commitment to the people that live and work on Grand Isle.”"This news could not be more timely for Grand Isle, whose people faced some of Hurricane Ida's worst impacts," said CPRA Chairman Chip Kline. "Over $120 million will go toward continuing the recovery process and ensuring improved protection measures are in place ahead of stronger storms and severe weather."

The repairs will begin in August 2022 with installing interim risk reduction measures by placing supersack sandbags at 12 locations along the dune. This work will be followed by a contract to install 2,200-foot stone dune core on the western end of the project, repair damages to the existing breakwaters, and repair the western jetty. This contract is scheduled to be executed in early 2023.

Additionally, 21,000 feet of clay-filled geotextile tube will be installed along the western portion of the project, damages to the eastern sand-filled geotube addressed, and the overall 7-mile dune and beach restored.

"The Grand Isle project not only includes repairs to the burrito levee, but the addition of over 2,000 feet of stone core dune on the island's western end and the installation of a clay core for 4 miles of the dune," said CPRA Executive Director Bren Haase. "These elements will work together to provide integrated protection, and we're grateful for the collaboration that made this progress possible."

The repairs will be in addition to work currently underway. Congress included $15 million in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 to construct risk reduction features on the barrier island. These funds were used to construct five breakwaters and undertake beach nourishment. Upon completion, the remaining funds are now being used to construct an adjacent sixth breakwater.

Congress and the Administration also included appropriations in the post-Ida Disaster Relief Supplement Appropriation Act of 2022 to investigate sustainable and more resilient approaches to reducing risk for Grand Isle. Completion of a general reevaluation report will take approximately three years and cost $3 million. Upon finalization of the feasibility cost share agreement between USACE and CPRA, the study will open with scoping meetings to gather feedback from residents and stakeholders.

                                                                   ###

**Contact**

Release no. 22-015

Hurricane Recovery Operations

Ida
EXHIBIT 31.2
Cronos Global Income Fund XIV, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos GlobalIncome Fund XIV, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004
/s/ JOHN KALLASJohn Kallas
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00396

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 324

- 651770

- 18

Before Sud derth, C.J.; Gabriel and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### T ABITHA 

### F ELTON 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, rela tor’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : December 12, 2019
1 min read

# The SpaceX Freedom Dragon crew ship with the Axiom Mission-2 crew

### Mark A. Garcia

May 24, 2023

Image Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

iss069e011321 (May 22, 2023) — The SpaceX Freedom Dragon crew spacecraft with four Axiom Mission-2 private astronauts aboard is pictured approaching the International Space Station 262 miles above the Earth. Freedom, commanded by former NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, with Pilot John Shoffner and Mission Specialists Ala Alqarni and Rayyanah Barnawi, docked to the Harmony module’s space-facing port at 9:12 a.m. EDT on Monday beginning eight days of docked operations with the seven-member Expedition 69 crew.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Robert D. McDermott, Chief Financial Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT D. MCDERMOTT                     
|                     |  |     |  | Robert D. McDermott, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



April 23, 2020




Reference is made to that certain Senior Leadership Retention and Severance Plan (effective January 27, 2016, with Exhibit A updated as of August 22, 2018) (the “Plan”).  




The undersigned (“Participant”) hereby consents to a reduction in Participant’s base salary equal to 25% of Participant’s base salary on the date set forth above, which reduction will be effective beginning at 12:01 am on April 26, 2020 and ending at 11:59 p.m. on June 20, 2020 (the “Reduction”), and acknowledges and agrees that the occurrence of the Reduction shall not constitute Good Reason and, accordingly, in the event Participant terminates Participant’s employment in reliance on or as a result of the Reduction, Participant shall not be entitled to the benefits described in Section 3(a) of the Plan (or, for clarity, Section 3(b) of the Plan).  




For clarity, this consent is with respect to the reduction in Participant’s base salary only as described above and, specifically, only until 11:59 p.m. on June 20, 2020.  Thereafter, the terms of the Plan, without regard to this consent, shall apply.  
 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED




Signature: ________________________________                                                 


Name:___________________________________                             
(Please Print)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS LEE BOYD.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.133
                                   DEMAND NOTE

$250,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                              February 23, 1999

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Fifty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($250,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest of 8.5%
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                                 Wilshire Technologies, Inc.

                                                 By: /s/ Kathleen E. Terry
                                                     ---------------------- 
                                                 Name: Kathleen E. Terry
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 7, 2010, National Center 
for Natural Products Research--NIDA MProject, University of 
Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Lab Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed in schedule I:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute 
on Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and 
Human Services.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than December 20, 2010.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-26450 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6204

JAMES CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY HATHAWAY, III,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason,

Magistrate Judge. (1:07-cv-00348-RAE)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 24, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Christopher Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Christopher Anderson seeks to appeal the orders of

the magistrate judge*

 denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition and his motion to reconsider. The orders are not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Anderson has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,424
<INVENTORY>                                     85,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,013
<PP&E>                                         118,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 843,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,841
<BONDS>                                        228,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     470,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   843,615
<SALES>                                        409,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               409,317
<CGS>                                          330,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (56,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (21,486)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,987)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (34,987)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (34,987)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 74

#### James C. Neves and William Neves, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*William H. Scott and others, defendants in error.

£1.] When the record shows, that the persons appearing as plaintiffs in error, were dead at the time of the suing out and filing of the writ of error, and that their legal representatives are not parties thereto, that writ will "be dismissed. ■

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

The ground stated in this motion was, that it appeared from the record, that both the plaintiffs in error, James C. Neves and William Neves, were dead, at the time of the filing and suing out of the writ of error, and that their legal representatives have never been made parties, ip the Court below.

The record showed, that the proceeding in the Court below," was a motion made by S. Jones and S. T. Bailey, to set aside a decree on demurrer, to a bill filed by them, as solicitors for the complainants, on the ground that James 0. Neves, one of the complainants, was dead when the bill was filed, which fact was unknown to them. Before the motion was heard, but after the judgment on the demurrer, William Neves also died, ■and on suggestion of his death, they moved to continue their ■former motion, until his representatives were made parties. The Court below refused the motion, and discharged the first ■rule. To this decision, the writ of error was sued out in' the names of James C. Neves and William Neves.

Judge Benning having been formerly of counsel in this ease, did not preside.

Rockwell, represented by T. R. R, Cobb, for the motion.

S. Jones, *contra.*

*511
      *By the Court.*

Starnes J.,

delivering the opinion.

j[l.] This Court is always anxious to maintain a writ of error, if it can be lawfully done, and will never dismiss the same, -except for reasons of substantial justice. Such reasons constrain us to dismiss this proceeding.

^There are no parties before us. The writ of error runs in the names of William Neves and John 0. Neves, complainants, and the citation also refers to the case, as between these persons and the defendants. But the record shows, that both William and John C. Neves are dead—that their estates are not represented.; and that this case, though in their names, is brought here by others. They, however, are made, by the record, parties to the case, or there are no parties. They, of course, cannot be parties, and any judgment which we may render, therefore, must be fruitless. It can bind no one.

A Court of Justice should never interfere, to do a vain or a fruitless thing; and this writ of error must be dismissed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 13, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1711

Lower Tribunal No. F14-700

________________

Edward R. Brown,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Edward R. Brown, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.