63858 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2580. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

October 8, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain digital televisions 

and components thereof that infringe 

one or more of claims 1, 4–9, 12–14, and 

17–30 of them ’070 patent; claims 1–20 

and 22–26 of the ’906 patent; and claims 

1–25 of the ’233 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: LG 

Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20, 

Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 

Seoul, 150–721, Korea. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618. 

AmTRAN Technology Co., Ltd., 17f, 

268, Lien Cheng Rd., Chungho City, 

Taipei, 23553, Taiwan. 

AmTRAN Logistic, Inc., 9531 Irvine 

Center Dr., Irvine, CA 92618–4654. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Kecia R. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: October 12, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26111 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on October 

8, 2010 a proposed consent decree 

(‘‘proposed Decree’’) in United States v. 

Albert Investment Co., Inc., et al., Civil 

Action No. 08–637C, was lodged with 

the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Oklahoma. 

In this action under Section 107(a) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a) (‘‘CERCLA’’), the 

United States and State of Oklahoma’s 

complaint seeks reimbursement of 

response costs incurred or to be 

incurred for response actions taken and 

damages for injury to, destruction of, or 

loss of natural resources, including the 

reasonable costs of assessing such injury 

destruction or loss, at or in connection 

with the release or threatened release of 

hazardous substances at the Double 

Eagle Superfund Site, in Oklahoma City, 

Oklahoma. 

The proposed Decree is an amended 

version of an earlier Decree which was 

lodged in the case, and which has now 

been withdrawn. The proposed Decree 

requires the defendants to pay 

approximately $6,268,643 to the United 

States and the State in reimbursement of 

past response costs and $329,929 in 

state and federal natural resource 

damages. The proposed Decree provides 

the defendants with a covenant not to 

sue under Sections 106 and 107(a) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a) 

that are subject various reopeners and 

reservations. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Albert Investment Co., Inc., et 

al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–857/5. 

The proposed Decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney for the Western District 

of Oklahoma, 210 Park Avenue, Suite 

400, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, 

Texas 75202. During the public 

comment period, the proposed Decree 

may also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed Decree may also be obtained 

by mail from the Consent Decree 

Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department 

of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 

or by faxing or e-mailing a request to 

Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$20.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the stated address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26136 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES