alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        9

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,404,688
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,300,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     45,674,128
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,891,300
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,897,000
<LOANS>                                         84,211,706
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,235,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,456,403
<DEPOSITS>                                     112,038,717
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,085,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,485,784
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,617,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            14,493
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,215,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 141,456,403
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,000,638
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,974,827
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    71,251
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,046,716
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,225,794
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,672,608
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,374,108
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                            0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7,147
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,132,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,005,555
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         664,198
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       664,198
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        472,810
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,291,901
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      100,342
<RECOVERIES>                                        43,678
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,235,237
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               941,593
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            293,644


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY BURNEY.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      308
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   308
<PP&E>                                          44,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               56
<BONDS>                                          2,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,566
<SALES>                                            425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   425
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       89
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  79
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6


 


同意函


Letter of Consent


 


本人,周小萍(身份证号码:
320222197211156925),为 高晓峰(身份证号码:
320222197104203458)之合法配偶。本人在此无条件并不可撤销地同意高晓峰于2019年7月17日签署下列文件(下称“交易文件”),并同意按照以下文件的约定处置高晓峰持有、并登记在其名下的无锡王道科技有限公司(“公司”)的股权:


I, Zhou Xiaoping (ID Number: 320222197211156925),
is the lawful spouse of Gao Xiaofeng (ID Number: 320222197104203458). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree
that Gao Xiaofeng signed the following documents (hereinafter referred to as “Transaction Documents”)
on July 17, 2019 and consent to dispose of the shares of Wuxi Kingway Technology Limited (“Company”) held by
Gao Xiaofeng and registered under his name in accordance with the provisions of following documents:


 


		(1)	与能工网络科技(无锡)有限公司(下称“WFOE”)、公司及公司其他股东签署的《股权质押合同》;



The Equity Pledge Agreement signed
by Skillful Craftsman Internet Technology (Wuxi) Limited (hereinafter referred to as “WFOE”), Company
and other shareholders of the Company;


 


		(2)	与WFOE、公司及公司其他股东签署的《独家购买权合同》;及



The Exclusive Purchasing Right
Agreement signed by WFOE, Company and other shareholders of Domestic Enterprise;


 


		(3)	与WFOE及公司其他股东签署的《授权委托协议》。



The Authorization Agreement signed
by WFOE and other shareholders of Company.


 


本人确认本人对公司的股权不享有任何权益,且承诺不就公司的股权提出任何主张。本人进一步确认,高晓峰履行交易文件以及进一步修改或终止交易文件或签署其他文件代替交易文件,并不需要本人另行授权或同意。


I confirm that I do not have any interests
in the equity of Company and promise not to make any claim on the equity of the Company. I further confirm that the performance
of the Transaction Documents and further modification or termination of the Transaction Documents or the signature of other documents
to replace the Transaction Documents by GAO Xiaofeng does not require my authorization or consent.


 






     


     


    

 


本人承诺将签署一切必要的文件,并采取一切必要的行动,以确保(经不时修订的)交易文件得到适当履行。


I promise I will sign all necessary documents
and take all necessary actions to ensure that the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) are properly performed.


 


本人同意并承诺,如本人由于任何原因获得公司的任何股权,则本人应受(经不时修订的)交易文件的约束,并遵守作为公司的股东在(经不时修订的)交易文件下的义务,且为此目的,一旦WFOE提出要求,本人应签署格式和内容基本与(经不时修订的)的交易文件相同的一系列书面文件。


I agree and promise that if I acquire any
equity interests in the Company for any reason, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and
abide by the obligations of the shareholders of the Company under the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time). For
this purpose, once upon the requests of the WFOE, I shall sign a series of written documents with the same format and contents
as the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).


 


	 	/s/
                                         Zhou Xiaoping
	 	(Signature)
	 	 
	 	姓名:周小萍
	 	Name: Zhou Xiaoping
	 	 
	 	日期: 2019年7月17日
	 	Date:July 17, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 28, 2010, PCAS-
Nanosyn, LLC, 3331-B Industrial Drive, Santa Rosa, California 95403, 
made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Diprenorphine (9058).......................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Oxymorphone (9652).........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company is a contract manufacturer. At the request of the 
company's customers, it manufactures derivatives of controlled 
substances in bulk form only. The primary service provided by the 
company to its customers is the development of the process of 
manufacturing the derivative. As part of its service to its customers, 
the company distributes the derivatives of the controlled substances it 
manufactures to those customers. The company's customers use the newly-
created processes and the manufactured derivatives in furtherance of 
formulation processes and dosage form manufacturing; pre-clinical 
studies, including toxicological studies; clinical studies supporting 
investigational Drug Applications; and use in stability studies.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR Sec.  1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than December 13, 2010.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-25849 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# Sitemap

## March 07, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 03
- March 07, 2011

            - NASA Officials Speak At Space Station And Mars Conference
            - Jupiter Spacecraft Nearing Completion
Process for Unacceptable Request for Appeal

Is RFA complete?

Yes No

Appendix D

Review officer returns 

RFA for applicant to complete.

Is revised RFA 

complete?

Appeal process

withdrawn. No 

further appeal 

is possible.

Does RFA meet 

criteria?

Division Engineer returns 

RFA to applicant to revise.

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Division Engineer

determines RFA is

unacceptable.

(From Appendix A)

Yes

Appeal process

begins on date 

of receipt of

acceptable 

RFA. (See

Appendix A

for process.)

Does revised

RFA meet criteria

for appeal?
585 A.2d 349

#### MARY ANN VUOCOLO, ETC. v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CHEMICALS COMPANY.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*289, 573 A.2d 196)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY T. WILSON.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT DICKERSON.

November 21, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                            Midwest Bancshares, Inc.
              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
                        Periods ended September 30, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months         Nine Months
                                                             ------------         -----------

<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>     
Net earnings (loss)                                             ($187,288)           $348,574
                                                              ============       =============

Primary earnings per share:
   Weighted average shares outstanding                            349,379             355,303

   Average option shares granted                                   34,125              34,125
   Less assumed purchase of shares
      using treasury method                                       (13,567)            (13,215)
                                                              ------------       -------------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                   369,937             376,213
                                                              ============       =============


Earnings per common share -- primary                               ($0.51)              $0.93
                                                              ============       =============


Fully-diluted earnings per share:
   Weighted average shares outstanding                            349,379             355,303

   Average option shares granted                                   34,125              34,125
   Less assumed purchase of shares
      using treasury method                                       (13,125)            (13,125)
                                                              ------------       -------------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                   370,379             376,303
                                                              ============       =============


Earnings per common share -- fully-diluted                         ($0.51)              $0.93
                                                              ============       =============

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00027-CR

MICHELLE LYNN REAVES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-04266-CRF-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michelle Lynn Reaves has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in this appeal. Reaves and her counsel 

have signed the motion. The motion is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Reaves is dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Reaves v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 12, 2020

Do not publish

[CR25]
EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated April 10, 2007 on our review of the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of February 28,
2007, and for the three and six month periods ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 is incorporated by references in the Companys Registration Statement
No. 333-72756. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.                          
|Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C. Houston,
Texas April 13, 2007
# USACE Opens Updated National Levee Database

**Contact**Walter.E.Pierce@usace.army.mil

**WASHINGTON –**The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) today opened the updated National Levee Database (NLD) for public access.  The NLD is a living, dynamic information source that provides visualization and search capability on the location and condition of levee systems nationwide.  

“The National Levee Database is a public view into the information that builds understanding of the benefits and potential risks levees pose for the communities in which they exist,” said Eric C. Halpin, P.E., USACE deputy dam and levee safety officer. “The database now contains levee information within the USACE program, FEMA, and other states and federal agencies. We continue to work closely with additional federal, state, and local agencies and tribes to include the information about other levees on a voluntary basis.”

The database includes attributes of levees and floodwalls relevant to flood fighting, design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair and inspection.  Because the location and characteristics of levee systems can be viewed on a map with real-time data from other sources, such as stream gauges and weather radar, it is a useful tool for a variety of public agencies and individuals including flood plain managers, emergency management agencies, levee system sponsors and citizens who live or work behind a levee.  

Currently the NLD includes information on approximately 33,000 miles of levee, which includes 14,500 miles of levees systems associated with USACE programs, 15,000 miles from the FEMA mid-term levee inventory and several other states and federal agencies.

The database is available at https://levees.sec.usace.army.mil

More information about the USACE Levee Safety Program is available at:  WWW.USACE.ARMY.MIL/LeveeSafety

 

-30-

Release no. 18-035

levees

Database

national levee database
rad_Ex10_44


		
			Exhibit 10.44
		

		
			November 6, 2019
		

		
			Ms. Jessica Kazmaier
Executive Vice President and
Chief Human Resources Officer
Rite Aid Corporation
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, PA 17011
		

		
			RE:         Agreement dated as of March 12, 2019 by and between Rite Aid Corporation (the "Company") and Jessica Kazmaier (the "Executive"), as amended from time to time (the "Agreement")
		

		
			Dear Jessica:
		

		
			I am pleased to provide you with this letter in order to update the Agreement to reflect your promotion to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company, effective September 18, 2019 (the "Amendment Date"). The increase in base salary already is effective and has been in place for some time.
		

		
			In consideration of your appointment and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged:
		

		
			1.            Section 2.1 ("Position and Duties—Generally") is hereby amended by:
		

		
			a.            deleting the term "Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer" and replacing it with the term "Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer" in the first sentence of Section 2.1; and
		

		
			b.            deleting the term "customary for a Senior Vice President" and replacing it with the term "customary for an Executive Vice President" in the first sentence of Section 2.1.
		

		
			2.            Section 3.1 ("Base Salary") is hereby amended by deleting the amount "Three Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($375,000)" and replacing it with the amount "four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000)".
		

		
			3.            Section 4.5 ("Annual Financial Planning Allowance") is hereby amended by deleting the amount "$3,000.00" and replacing it with the amount "$5,000.00".
		

		
			4.            Section 5.4(a) ("Definition of Good Reason") is hereby amended by deleting the term "Senior Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer" and replacing it with the term "Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer".
		

		
			If you are in agreement with the changes described in the above paragraphs, please sign both copies of this letter below where indicated, returning one copy to me and retaining one copy for your records.
		

		
			[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
		

		
			 
		

		
			
		

		
			


		 





		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						Sincerely,

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Rite Aid Corporation

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						/s/ James J. Comitale

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name: James J. Comitale

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:   Executive Vice President and General Counsel

				
	
					
						Agreed:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						/s/ Jessica Kazmaier

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Jessica Kazmaier
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3451

___________________________

William Vaughn

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: March 3, 2014

Filed: March 6, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

William Vaughn brought this action in the district court, asserting, inter alia,

1

that the Internal Revenue Service had illegally collected taxes on wages he had

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri.
earned. He now appeals an adverse post-judgment order. Upon careful review, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to

amend the judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See United

States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir. 2006) (Rule 59(e)

motions serve limited function of correcting manifest errors of law or fact or to

present newly discovered evidence; denial of Rule 59(e) motion reviewed for abuse

of discretion); see also United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256 (8th Cir. 1993)

(per curiam) (wages are within definition ofincome under InternalRevenueCode and

Sixteenth Amendment, and are subject to taxation). We further conclude that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Vaughn’s post-judgment request

for leave to file an amended complaint. See Horras v. Am. Capital Strategies, 729

F.3d 798, 804 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, No. 13-843, 2014 WL 177056, at *1 (U.S. Feb.

24, 2014) (denial of post-judgment requestfor leave to amend complaintreviewed for

abuse of discretion; district court may appropriately deny leave to amend where, for

example, amendment would be futile).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant the government’s

motion for sanctions, and we assess sanctions in the amount of $2,000. See 28 2

U.S.C. § 1912; Fed. R. App. P. 38; Gerads, 999 F.2d at 1256-57 (granting

government’s motion for $1,500 in sanctions where appellants had advanced on

appeal frivolous “tax-protestor” arguments that had been repeatedly rejected).

______________________________

We overrule Vaughn’s apparent objection to the clerk’s order that the

2

sanctions motion be taken with the case.

-2-