##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly
Period Ended February 28, 2007

Commission File No. 0-24414

RF Monolithics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 75-1638027                      
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification)



|                                         |  |           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|4441 Sigma Road, Dallas, Texas           |  | 75244     
|(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code (972) 233-2903

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x  Yes ̈No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 ̈Large accelerated
filer ̈Accelerated filer                    x  Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 ̈Yes                    x  No

As of March 31, 2007: 9,174,618 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, $.001 par value, were outstanding.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|           |  |                                                                                                                   |  |     
|---------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|ItemNumber |  |                                                                                                                   |  | Page
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                                     |  |     
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|1.         |  | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements  Unaudited                                                           |  |     
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets February 28, 2007, and August 31, 2006                                      |  | 2   
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations  Unaudited Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 |  | 3   
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  Unaudited Six Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006           |  | 4   
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                                                              |  | 5   
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|2.         |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                             |  | 15  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|3.         |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                        |  | 35  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|4.         |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                           |  | 35  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | PART II. OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                        |  |     
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|1A.        |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                      |  | 35  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|4.         |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                               |  | 36  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|6.         |  | Exhibits                                                                                                          |  | 37  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | SIGNATURES                                                                                                        |  | 38  
|           |  |                                                                                                                  
|           |  | INDEX TO EXHIBITS                                                                                                 |  | 39  



-1-



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|------- | -------------------------------------------

RF MONOLITHICS,
INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED

(In Thousands)



|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | - | --------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                               |  | February 28,2007 |         |   | *August 31,2006 |  
|ASSETS                                         |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|CURRENT ASSETS:                                |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                      |  | $                | 2,337   |   |                 | $ | 5,847   |  
|Trade receivables - net                        |  |                  | 8,030   |   |                 |   | 7,669   |  
|Inventories - net                              |  |                  | 10,432  |   |                 |   | 9,118   |  
|Prepaid expenses and other                     |  |                  | 450     |   |                 |   | 447     |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Total current assets                           |  |                  | 21,249  |   |                 |   | 23,081  |  
|PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Net                   |  |                  | 4,828   |   |                 |   | 6,275   |  
|GOODWILL                                       |  |                  | 8,984   |   |                 |   |        |  
|ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES - Net                  |  |                  | 10,857  |   |                 |   |        |  
|OTHER ASSETS - Net                             |  |                  | 1,059   |   |                 |   | 1,044   |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|TOTAL                                          |  | $                | 46,977  |   |                 | $ | 30,400  |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY           |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|CURRENT LIABILITIES:                           |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Current portion of long term debt - bank       |  | $                | 1,333   |   |                 | $ |        |  
|Current portion of long term debt - other      |  |                  | 3,118   |   |                 |   |        |  
|Capital lease obligations - current portion    |  |                  | 53      |   |                 |   |        |  
|Accounts payable - trade                       |  |                  | 3,708   |   |                 |   | 3,526   |  
|Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |  |                  | 2,101   |   |                 |   | 1,987   |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                      |  |                  | 10,313  |   |                 |   | 5,513   |  
|LONG-TERM DEBT - Less current portion:         |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Notes payable - bank                           |  |                  | 5,984   |   |                 |   |        |  
|Capital lease obligations                      |  |                  | 83      |   |                 |   |        |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Total long-term debt                           |  |                  | 6,067   |   |                 |   |        |  
|OTHER LIABILITIES                              |  |                  | 78      |   |                 |   | 111     |  
|STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:                          |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Common stock: 9,059 and 8,094 shares issued    |  |                  | 9       |   |                 |   | 8       |  
|Additional paid-in capital                     |  |                  | 48,223  |   |                 |   | 38,157  |  
|Common stock warrants                          |  |                  | 86      |   |                 |   | 86      |  
|Treasury stock, 36 common shares at cost       |  |                  | (227    | ) |                 |   | (227    | )
|Accumulated deficit                            |  |                  | (17,572 | ) |                 |   | (13,248 | )
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|Total stockholders equity                     |  |                  | 30,519  |   |                 |   | 24,776  |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  
|TOTAL                                          |  | $                | 46,977  |   |                 | $ | 30,400  |  
|                                               |  |                  |         |   |                 |   |         |  



|* | Derived from audited financial statements
|- | -----------------------------------------

See notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.



-2-



---

##### Table of Contents

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED

(In Thousands, Except Per-Share Amounts)



|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------ | - | ---------------------------- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                            |  | Three MonthsEnded February 28, |        |   | Six MonthsEnded February 28, |  
|                                            |  | 2007                           |        |   | 2006                         |   |        | 2007 |  |   | 2006   |  
|SALES                                       |  | $                              | 12,348 |   |                              | $ | 12,693 |      |  | $ | 28,151 |   |  | $ | 24,989 |  
|COST OF SALES                               |  |                                | 9,713  |   |                              |   | 8,906  |      |  |   | 19,939 |   |  |   | 17,884 |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|GROSS PROFIT                                |  |                                | 2,635  |   |                              |   | 3,787  |      |  |   | 8,212  |   |  |   | 7,105  |  
|OPERATING EXPENSES:                         |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Research and development                    |  |                                | 2,236  |   |                              |   | 1,131  |      |  |   | 4,353  |   |  |   | 2,307  |  
|Sales and marketing                         |  |                                | 1,915  |   |                              |   | 1,632  |      |  |   | 4,134  |   |  |   | 3,124  |  
|General and administrative                  |  |                                | 1,084  |   |                              |   | 810    |      |  |   | 2,270  |   |  |   | 1,560  |  
|Restructuring and impairment                |  |                                | 1,201  |   |                              |   |       |      |  |   | 1,437  |   |  |   |       |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total operating expenses                    |  |                                | 6,436  |   |                              |   | 3,573  |      |  |   | 12,194 |   |  |   | 6,991  |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS               |  |                                | (3,801 | ) |                              |   | 214    |      |  |   | (3,982 | ) |  |   | 114    |  
|OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):                     |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Interest income                             |  |                                | 10     |   |                              |   | 49     |      |  |   | 36     |   |  |   | 93     |  
|Interest expense                            |  |                                | (219   | ) |                              |   | (19    | )    |  |   | (397   | ) |  |   | (35    | )
|Other                                       |  |                                | 34     |   |                              |   | (99    | )    |  |   | 33     |   |  |   | (75    | )
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total other income (expense)                |  |                                | (175   | ) |                              |   | (69    | )    |  |   | (328   | ) |  |   | (17    | )
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|INCOME(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES            |  |                                | (3,976 | ) |                              |   | 145    |      |  |   | (4,310 | ) |  |   | 97     |  
|INCOME TAX EXPENSE                          |  |                                | 13     |   |                              |   | 5      |      |  |   | 14     |   |  |   | 6      |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|NET INCOME (LOSS)                           |  | $                              | (3,989 | ) |                              | $ | 140    |      |  | $ | (4,324 | ) |  | $ | 91     |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE                   |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                       |  | $                              | (0.44  | ) |                              | $ | 0.02   |      |  | $ | (0.48  | ) |  | $ | 0.01   |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                     |  | $                              | (0.44  | ) |                              | $ | 0.02   |      |  | $ | (0.48  | ) |  | $ | 0.01   |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                       |  |                                | 9,001  |   |                              |   | 7,981  |      |  |   | 8,918  |   |  |   | 7,965  |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                     |  |                                | 9,001  |   |                              |   | 8,381  |      |  |   | 8,918  |   |  |   | 8,314  |  
|                                            |  |                                |        |   |                              |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



-3-



---

##### Table of Contents

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED

(In Thousands)



|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                                           |  | Six MonthsEnded February 28, |       
|                                                                           |  | 2007                         |        |   | 2006 |  
|OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net income (loss)                                                          |  | $                            | (4,324 | ) |      | $ | 91     |  
|Noncash items included in net income (loss):                               |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                              |  |                              | 1,196  |   |      |   | 1,084  |  
|Depreciation and amortization - acquisition costs                          |  |                              | 911    |   |      |   |       |  
|Charge for inventory obsolescence and asset impairment                     |  |                              | 2,399  |   |      |   |       |  
|Provision for trade receivable allowance                                   |  |                              | 55     |   |      |   | 15     |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                   |  |                              | 210    |   |      |   | 367    |  
|Gain on disposal of property and equipment                                 |  |                              | (35    | ) |      |   | (59    | )
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions: |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Trade receivables                                                          |  |                              | 1,036  |   |      |   | (1,946 | )
|Inventories                                                                |  |                              | (1,193 | ) |      |   | 361    |  
|Prepaid expenses and other                                                 |  |                              | 75     |   |      |   | 109    |  
|Accounts payable - trade                                                   |  |                              | (1,143 | ) |      |   | 471    |  
|Accrued expenses and other liabilities                                     |  |                              | (362   | ) |      |   | (27    | )
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities                        |  |                              | (1,175 | ) |      |   | 466    |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Payments for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired                   |  |                              | (8,589 | ) |      |   |       |  
|Acquisition of property and equipment                                      |  |                              | (415   | ) |      |   | (1,115 | )
|Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment                        |  |                              | 35     |   |      |   | 136    |  
|Change in other assets                                                     |  |                              | (370   | ) |      |   | (120   | )
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                      |  |                              | (9,339 | ) |      |   | (1,099 | )
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Borrowings on bank term note                                               |  |                              | 4,000  |   |      |   |       |  
|Net borrowings on bank revolver note                                       |  |                              | 3,650  |   |      |   |       |  
|Repayments of bank notes                                                   |  |                              | (1,004 | ) |      |   |       |  
|Repayments of capital lease obligations and other third party financing    |  |                              | (24    | ) |      |   | (60    | )
|Change in other liabilities                                                |  |                              | (3     | ) |      |   | (7     | )
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock                                     |  |                              | 385    |   |      |   | 185    |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                  |  |                              | 7,004  |   |      |   | 118    |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                      |  |                              | (3,510 | ) |      |   | (515   | )
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:                                                 |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Beginning of period                                                        |  |                              | 5,847  |   |      |   | 5,450  |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|End of period                                                              |  | $                            | 2,337  |   |      | $ | 4,935  |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:                                                  |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Interest paid                                                              |  | $                            | 190    |   |      | $ | 2      |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Income taxes paid                                                          |  | $                            |       |   |      | $ | 4      |  
|                                                                           |  |                              |        |   |      |   |        |  

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



-4-



---

##### Table of Contents

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|1. | INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|-- | ----------------------------

The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, that in the opinion of the management of RF Monolithics, Inc. are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position as of February 28, 2007, the results of operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 and cash flows for the six months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006. These unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Operating results for the six months ended February 28, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the full
fiscal year ending August 31, 2007.



|2. | INVENTORIES
|-- | -----------

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):



|                           |  |                  |        |   |                |   |        |  
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------ | - | -------------- | - | ------ | -
|                           |  | February 28,2007 |        |   | August 31,2006 |  
|Raw materials and supplies |  | $                | 4,450  |   |                | $ | 3,778  |  
|Work in process            |  |                  | 1,540  |   |                |   | 2,040  |  
|Finished goods             |  |                  | 6,711  |   |                |   | 4,196  |  
|                           |  |                  |        |   |                |   |        |  
|Total gross inventories    |  |                  | 12,701 |   |                |   | 10,014 |  
|Less: Inventory reserves   |  |                  | (2,269 | ) |                |   | (896   | )
|                           |  |                  |        |   |                |   |        |  
|Total inventories          |  | $                | 10,432 |   |                | $ | 9,118  |  
|                           |  |                  |        |   |                |   |        |  

Inventories at February 28, 2007 include approximately $1.2 million from companies acquired
in the first quarter (see Note 10). Another reason for the inventory increase is an increase in finished goods inventory for satellite radio filters due to a reduction in sales in that volatile market. In the previous quarter, demand suddenly
decreased but we were unable to slow down inventory coming from our contractors, as we give them a longer lead time than we provide to our customers to maintain our competitive position. In the current quarter, we greatly reduced the inflow of
finished goods from our contractors. While we worked down inventory $600,000 in the current quarter, we anticipate much more progress in our third quarter.

In the current quarter, we increased inventory reserves by recording a $1.2 million charge related to obsolescence and write-down of inventory associated with the outsourcing of all Dallas manufacturing. The charge was recorded as cost of
sales in our consolidated statement of operations.



-5-



---

##### Table of Contents

|3. | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|-- | ----------------------

Property and equipment included
construction in progress of $159,000 at February 28, 2007, and $587,000 at August 31, 2006, which was composed primarily of manufacturing equipment and other fixed assets not yet placed in service. Also, property and equipment include
approximately $500,000 (net book value) from companies acquired in the first quarter (see Note 10).

In the current quarter we recorded an impairment of
fixed assets charge of $1.2 million, which was a result of a write down of fixed assets associated with the outsourcing of all Dallas manufacturing. See Note 9 on restructuring and impairment.



|4. | CREDIT FACILITIES
|-- | -----------------

Our debt at February 28, 2007 and
August 31, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):



|                              |  |                  |        |                |   |  
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------ | -------------- | - | -
|                              |  | February 28,2007 |        | August 31,2006
|Bank revolving line-of-credit |  | $                | 3,650  |                | $ | 
|Bank term note                |  |                  | 3,667  |                |   |  
|Other notes                   |  |                  | 3,118  |                |   | 
|                              |  |                  |        |                |   |  
|Total                         |  |                  | 10,435 |                |   | 
|Less: Current maturity        |  |                  | 4,451  |                |   | 
|                              |  |                  |        |                |   |  
|Long-term debt                |  | $                | 5,984  |                | $ | 
|                              |  |                  |        |                |   |  

On September 1, 2006, our previous banking agreement, dated December 31, 2004, was amended and restated
to increase the revolving credit arrangement to a limit of $11.0 million and add a $4.0 million term note. Substantially all of our assets, tangible and intangible, are pledged as collateral. The term of the agreement was extended to
December 1, 2009. The principal purpose of this amended and restated agreement was to finance the acquisitions of Cirronet Inc. and the Caver-Morehead assets in September 2006. See discussion of these acquisitions in Note 10. The $4.0 million
term note calls for twelve equal quarterly payments to the bank starting December 1, 2006. The revolving line of credit expires on December 1, 2009 and thus any outstanding borrowings against this facility are due at that time. As of
February 28, 2007, our revolving line of credit facility had a loan availability of approximately $1.5 million from our borrowing base which is based on eligible accounts receivable. The amount available under our borrowing base at fiscal year
end August 31, 2006 was approximately $5.3 million. Financial covenants under the new revolving credit arrangement include financial covenants as to the ratio of current assets (less inventory) to current liabilities (net of the current portion
of revolver advances), ratio of liabilities to tangible net worth, profitability, and fixed charges coverage. We were in compliance with all covenants as of February 28, 2007, except for the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, which has since
been waived. Using our financial forecast, our bank has agreed to amend the loan agreement to avoid a future covenant violation for the balance of our current fiscal year ending August 31, 2007, the latest date for which a requirement for such
covenant is defined. The amendment also will revise our borrowing base calculation effective for our next quarter in a manner that will reduce our availability by approximately $1.0 to $1.5 million. Consistent with prior years, the loan covenants
for our next fiscal year will be reset at the beginning of that year.

The interest rate on all borrowings under our banking agreement is based on either
bank prime or LIBOR. The interest rate changes periodically and can be fixed for up to a three-month period. The interest rates on borrowings as of February 28, 2007 are in the range of 7.375% to 8.250%.



-6-



---

##### Table of Contents

Notes issued to previous shareholders of the companies acquired (mentioned above) total $3.1 million, are subordinated to
the bank debt, bear interest in the range of 5.25% to 6.50% and are payable in November 2007.



|5. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
|-- | ------------------------------

We adopted SFAS 123(Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), for our fiscal year beginning September 1, 2005 using the modified prospective method. In compliance with the standard, we recorded stock-based compensation expense in the current year related to
options for employees and directors and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The fair value of stock options granted and favorable pricing of our stock offered under the ESPP is determined using the Black-Scholes model. Prior to fiscal year
2006, we accounted for our option plans and ESPP under APB 25 and, accordingly, did not recognize compensation expense for options granted to employees and directors or for our ESPP. Compensation expense for consultant options has been recorded in
the current and prior years and is recognized over the vesting life of the options, which is aligned with the consulting service life.

In the second
quarter of fiscal year 2006, we changed from granting stock options as the primary means of stock compensation to granting restricted stock units, or RSUs. The fair value of any RSU grant is based on the market value of our shares included in the
RSU on the date of grant and is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

The following table illustrates the stock compensation expense
recognized in the three and six months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006. Compensation expense recognized in thousands was:

Stock Compensation
Expense:



|                                          |  |                                 |     |                           |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------- | - | ---- |  | ---- | --- |  | - | ---
|                                          |  | Compensation Expense Recognized
|                                          |  | Three months ended Feb. 28,     |     | Six months ended Feb. 28,
|Stock Compensation Plan                   |  | 2007                            |     | 2006                      |   | 2007 |  | 2006
|Stock options for employees and directors |  | $                               | 32  |                           | $ | 151  |  | $    | 69  |  | $ | 303
|Employee Stock Purchase Plan              |  |                                 | 11  |                           |   | 10   |  |      | 22  |  |   | 20 
|Stock options for consultants             |  |                                 | 8   |                           |   | 9    |  |      | 14  |  |   | 21 
|Restricted Stock Units                    |  |                                 | 64  |                           |   | 23   |  |      | 105 |  |   | 23 
|                                          |  |                                 |     |                           |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    
|Totals                                    |  | $                               | 115 |                           | $ | 193  |  | $    | 210 |  | $ | 367
|                                          |  |                                 |     |                           |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    

As of February 28, 2007, we had an aggregate of 2.2 million shares authorized for issuance under our
active equity plans. The equity plans provide for the issuance of common shares pursuant to stock option exercises, issuance of restricted stock grants and restricted stock units. As of February 28, 2007, there were an aggregate of
3.0 million grants outstanding under the plans and approximately 388,000 shares available for grant under the plans. Under the equity plans, stock options, restricted stock grants and restricted stock units can be issued to employees,
non-employee directors and consultants.

Our stock compensation program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and
retain talented personnel and align stockholder and employee interests. We currently have five plans (2006 Plan, 1999 Plan, 1997 Plan, 1986 Plan and Director Plan) under which we may grant or have granted stock options and/or RSUs to employees,
directors and consultants. We also assumed stock options (the Assumed



-7-



---

##### Table of Contents

Cirronet Options) granted by Cirronet Inc., which we acquired in September 2006 (see Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements). These
options were assumed as fully vested. Options generally vest at a rate of one forty-eighth each month. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of our stock on the date of grant and each option generally expires ten years after the
date of grant. The RSUs generally vest at a rate of one-fourth at each anniversary of the grant date.

The vested shares are issued to the grantee at each
vesting date. The 1986 Plan expired for future grants according to its terms in November 2002, but options previously granted remain in effect in accordance with their terms. The Director Plan expired for future grants according to its terms in
April 2004, but options previously granted remain in effect in accordance with their terms. The 2006 Plan was approved by stockholders at our annual meeting on January 17, 2007, and replaces our 1997 Plan for future grants of options and RSUs.
When stock options are exercised, new common stock is issued.

Stock Options  There were no stock option grants in the current year as
compared to 6,000 incentive stock option grants to employees in the prior year. As of February 28, 2007, options to purchase 98,639 shares of stock were cancelled in the current year due to employee terminations and option period expirations.

Generally, the stock option plans are on a four-year monthly vesting schedule beginning the first day of the month following the date of grant. The
exercise price of each option equals the market price of our stock on the date of grant and the options expire ten years after the date of grant. The summary of stock option activity for all of the prior fiscal year and the current fiscal year as of
February 28, 2007 follows:



|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | - |  | ----------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------- | - | -----
|                                 |  | Fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 
|                                 |  | Shares                             |   |  | Weighted-AverageExercisePrice |      | Weighted-AverageRemainingContractualTerm (years) |     | AggregateIntrinsicValue($000)
|Outstanding at September 1, 2005 |  | 2,227,075                          |   |  | $                             | 6.29 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Granted                          |  | 6,000                              |   |  | $                             | 5.01 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Exercised                        |  | (89,254                            | ) |  | $                             | 3.49 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Expired/cancelled                |  | (111,079                           | ) |  | $                             | 7.49 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Outstanding at August 31, 2006   |  | 2,032,742                          |   |  | $                             | 6.34 |                                                  | 4.8 |                               | $ | 2,276
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Exercisable at August 31, 2006   |  | 1,950,323                          |   |  | $                             | 6.37 |                                                  | 4.7 |                               | $ | 2,173
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | Six Months Ended February 28, 2007
|                                 |  | Shares                             |   |  | Weighted-AverageExercisePrice |      | Weighted-AverageRemainingContractualTerm (years) |     | AggregateIntrinsicValue($000)
|Outstanding at September 1, 2006 |  | 2,032,742                          |   |  | $                             | 6.34 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Assumed acquired company options |  | 1,089,468                          |   |  | $                             | 1.31 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Exercised                        |  | (209,818                           | ) |  | $                             | 1.55 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Expired/cancelled                |  | (98,639                            | ) |  | $                             | 7.83 |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Outstanding at February 28, 2007 |  | 2,813,753                          |   |  | $                             | 4.70 |                                                  | 4.3 |                               | $ | 3,162
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      
|Exercisable at February 28, 2007 |  | 2,769,427                          |   |  | $                             | 4.67 |                                                  | 4.2 |                               | $ | 3,158
|                                 |  |                                    |   |  |                               |      |                                                  |     |                               |   |      



-8-



---

##### Table of Contents

The aggregate intrinsic values in the tables above are calculated using the market price on August 31, 2006 of $6.19
and February 28, 2007 of $4.16. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in fiscal year 2006 was $2.72. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended February 28, 2007 and fiscal year 2006
was $577,842 and $224,780, respectively. Intrinsic values of nonqualified or disqualifying ISO options exercised will result in a deduction for tax purposes.

We have certain tax benefits that will be recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital when realized based upon the with-and-without method. We have net operating loss carryforwards that are sufficient to offset taxable
income. Under the with-and-without method, an excess tax benefit will be realized when the excess share-based compensation deduction provides us with incremental benefit by reducing the current years taxes payable.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at February 28, 2007 for all five plans and the Assumed Cirronet Options:



|                         |  |                                      |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                                      |           |                               |   |      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------------------ | --------- | ----------------------------- | - | -----
|                         |  | Options Outstanding                  |  | Options Exercisable                     
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | NumberOutstandingat February28, 2007 |  | Weighted-AverageRemainingContractualLife |  | Weighted-AverageExercisePrice |       | NumberExercisableat February28, 2007 |           | Weighted-AverageExercisePrice
|$ 1.07 to $ 2.44         |  | 1,011,354                            |  | 3.93 years                               |  | $                             | 1.41  |                                      | 1,011,354 |                               | $ | 1.41 
|$ 2.66 to $ 3.88         |  | 370,695                              |  | 5.19 years                               |  | $                             | 3.17  |                                      | 366,320   |                               | $ | 3.17 
|$ 3.95 to $ 4.56         |  | 264,869                              |  | 3.86 years                               |  | $                             | 4.30  |                                      | 264,869   |                               | $ | 4.30 
|$ 4.88 to $ 7.50         |  | 650,793                              |  | 5.09 years                               |  | $                             | 6.35  |                                      | 617,717   |                               | $ | 6.35 
|$ 7.56 to $ 27.06        |  | 516,042                              |  | 3.36 years                               |  | $                             | 10.34 |                                      | 509,167   |                               | $ | 10.35
|                         |  |                                      |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                                      |           |                               |   |      
|Totals                   |  | 2,813,753                            |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                                      | 2,769,427 |                               |   |      
|                         |  |                                      |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                                      |           |                               |   |      

As of February 28, 2007, there was a total of $131,135 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested
stock options granted. The total cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

Restricted Stock Units - In
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we changed from granting stock options as a primary means of stock compensation to granting RSUs. We grant RSUs out of our stockholder-approved 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2006 Plan. Each RSU represents
the right to receive a share of common stock and typically is subject to vesting requirements, normally on an annual basis over four years. Stock is issued to the grantee at each annual vesting date. The fair value on the date of the RSUs vesting in
the quarter and year to date period ended February 28, 2007 was approximately $129,000. When the stock is issued at vesting, the employee may elect to have fewer shares granted, with the amount of the reduction used to cover the minimum income
and social security tax withholding requirements under IRS rules. The fair value of any RSUs granted is the market price of the common stock on the date of grant and is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. As approved by the
stockholders at annual meeting on January 17, 2007, all shares remaining under the 1997 Plan are available for issuance under the new 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. As of February 28, 2007, there was a total of $831,606 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested RSUs granted. The total cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years. The following table sets forth the status of our RSU compensation activity for all of the prior fiscal year
and the current fiscal year as of February 28, 2007:



-9-



---

##### Table of Contents

|                               |  |         |   |  |                                      |     
|------------------------------ |  | ------- | - |  | ------------------------------------ | ----
|Nonvested Shares               |  | Shares  |   |  | Weighted-AverageGrant-DateFair Value
|Nonvested at November 30, 2005 |  | 0       |   |  | $                                    | 0.00
|Granted                        |  | 110,950 |   |  | $                                    | 5.69
|Vested                         |  | 0       |   |  | $                                    | 0.00
|Cancelled                      |  | (2,900  | ) |  | $                                    | 5.69
|                               |  |         |   |  |                                      |     
|Nonvested at August 31, 2006   |  | 108,050 |   |  | $                                    | 5.69
|Granted                        |  | 84,250  |   |  | $                                    | 5.03
|Vested                         |  | (27,200 | ) |  | $                                    | 5.68
|Cancelled                      |  | (600    | ) |  | $                                    | 5.69
|                               |  |         |   |  |                                      |     
|Nonvested at February 28, 2007 |  | 164,500 |   |  | $                                    | 5.35
|                               |  |         |   |  |                                      |     



|6. | EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|-- | -------------------------

Our earnings (loss) per share is
computed by dividing our net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period. Our diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing our net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of
outstanding common and potentially dilutive shares. Potentially dilutive shares are derived from outstanding stock options, warrants and RSUs that have an exercise price less than the weighted average market price of our common stock. Any options
and warrants with an exercise price greater than the weighted average market price of our common stock are considered antidilutive and are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. In a period of net loss, all outstanding options,
warrants and RSUs are considered antidilutive. The number of common stock options, warrants and RSUs considered antidilutive and thus excluded from the year to date diluted earnings or loss per share computation at February 28, 2007 and 2006
were 3,008,253 and 1,206,431, respectively.



-10-



---

##### Table of Contents

|7. | SALES REVENUE
|-- | -------------

The following table sets forth the components of our
sales and the percentage relationship of the components to sales by product area for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentage data):



|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------ | ---------------------------- | - | ------------------------------ |  | - | ---------------------------- |  | - | ------ |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                 |  | Amounts                        |        | % of Total                   |  
|                                 |  | Three MonthsEnded February 28, |        | Six MonthsEnded February 28, |   | Three MonthsEnded February 28, |  |   | Six MonthsEnded February 28, | 
|                                 |  |                                | 2007   |                              |   | 2006                           |  |   | 2007                         |  |   | 2006   |  | 2007 |   |  | 2006 |   |  | 2007 |   |  | 2006 |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Product Sales:                   |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Wireless Solutions Group:        |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Virtual Wire Radio products (1) |  | $                              | 2,754  |                              | $ | 3,598                          |  | $ | 6,764                        |  | $ | 7,035  |  | 22   | % |  | 28   | % |  | 24   | % |  | 28   | %
|Cirronet and Aleier Brand        |  |                                | 3,370  |                              |   |                               |  |   | 6,511                        |  |   |       |  | 27   |   |  | 0    |   |  | 23   |   |  | 0    |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Subtotal                         |  |                                | 6,124  |                              |   | 3,598                          |  |   | 13,275                       |  |   | 7,035  |  | 49   |   |  | 28   |   |  | 47   |   |  | 28   |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Wireless Components Group:       |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Filters                          |  |                                | 3,705  |                              |   | 4,824                          |  |   | 8,145                        |  |   | 9,582  |  | 30   |   |  | 38   |   |  | 29   |   |  | 38   |  
|Frequency control modules        |  |                                | 619    |                              |   | 1,160                          |  |   | 2,305                        |  |   | 1,671  |  | 5    |   |  | 9    |   |  | 8    |   |  | 7    |  
|Low-power components             |  |                                | 1,900  |                              |   | 3,111                          |  |   | 4,426                        |  |   | 6,701  |  | 16   |   |  | 25   |   |  | 16   |   |  | 27   |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Subtotal                         |  |                                | 6,224  |                              |   | 9,095                          |  |   | 14,876                       |  |   | 17,954 |  | 51   |   |  | 72   |   |  | 53   |   |  | 72   |  
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Total sales                      |  | $                              | 12,348 |                              | $ | 12,693                         |  | $ | 28,151                       |  | $ | 24,989 |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | %
|                                 |  |                                |        |                              |   |                                |  |   |                              |  |   |        |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  



|(1) | Includes RFIC products
|--- | ----------------------

International sales were approximately 39% or
$4,865 during the current quarter and 51% or $6,514 during the comparable quarter of the prior year. We consider all product sales with a delivery destination outside of North America to be international sales.



|8. | INCOME TAXES
|-- | ------------

During the six months ended February 28, 2007
and 2006, we realized book income (loss) before income tax of ($4,310,000) and $97,000, respectively. In both the current and prior year we recorded small provisions for state income tax. We expect to record relatively small income tax provisions in
future periods. We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets due to net losses, as well as the general economic environment. However, we retain the tax benefits involved and we will realize the benefit in future
periods (1) to the extent we have taxable income in a reported period for which we utilize some of the tax benefit and (2) whenever, and to the extent, management concludes that it is more likely than not that we will also realize some of
the tax benefits in future periods.



|9. | RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT
|-- | ----------------------------

Restructuring

At the end of the current quarter, we announced the restructuring plan of our component business which includes the outsourcing of all Dallas
manufacturing. This restructuring plan calls for the future reduction in headcount of approximately 80 people. In accordance with SFAS 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the cost of severance, which is
estimated to be $700,000, will be accrued for and recognized ratably over the employees future service period, which is the period of time they are required to stay to receive the severance payment. None of the severance cost was accrued or
recognized in the current quarter. We expect to accrue this cost over the next three quarters, as our manufacturing operations in Dallas wind down.



-11-



---

##### Table of Contents

In the first quarter, we incurred approximately $236,000 in restructuring cost related to the severance of 37 employees.
This headcount reduction was an operations cost reduction at our Dallas headquarters resulting from a market downturn in our low-power components business.

The following represents a reconciliation of the employee severance accrual, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying financial statements (in thousands):



|                                |  |                                    |     |                                      |   |    
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------ | - | ---
|                                |  | Second Qtr. EndedFebruary 28, 2007 |     | First Quarter EndedNovember 30, 2006
|Beginning balance               |  | $                                  | 140 |                                      | $ |   
|Employee severance accrued      |  |                                    |    |                                      |   | 236
|Severance payments to employees |  |                                    | 136 |                                      |   | 96 
|                                |  |                                    |     |                                      |   |    
|Ending balance                  |  | $                                  | 4   |                                      | $ | 140
|                                |  |                                    |     |                                      |   |    

Impairment

In the current quarter, we recorded an impairment expense of approximately $1.2 million associated with the outsourcing of all Dallas manufacturing operations. This consists of the write-down or write-off of equipment and other assets that
were no longer usable to support manufacturing.



|10. | ACQUISITIONS
|--- | ------------

In September 2006, we completed the acquisition of
two companies as described below. The acquisitions were accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, or SFAS 141, Business Combinations. RFMs Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and six months ended February 28, 2007 include the results from both companies for the full period starting September 1, 2006.

In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, or SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and trademarks, which have indefinite lives, are not amortized, but will be reviewed periodically for
impairment. The remaining purchased intangibles will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their respectful useful lives. The fair value assigned to the acquired intangible assets was based on estimates and assumptions.

The purchase price allocation recorded as of February 28, 2007 is estimated and not final. We expect to finalize the purchase price allocation and make the
appropriate adjustments before our August 31, 2007 year end.

In the past several years, we have invested considerable resources in product and
marketing development to support our strategic plan for the Wireless Solutions business. To accelerate our efforts in this area, we acquired both Cirronet Inc. and the Caver-Morehead assets in the first quarter. We believe Wireless Solutions
products have a greater long-term potential for sales growth at relatively higher margin levels than the very price-sensitive Wireless Components products. The potential for increased sales and margins was the primary motivation for the
acquisitions. We believe the purchase price was in line with values of similar companies in the industry, which resulted in a material amount of goodwill.



-12-



---

##### Table of Contents

Aleier, Inc. (acquirer of the business of Caver-Morehead Systems, Inc.)

On September 1, 2006, Aleier, Inc., a newly created Texas corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of RFM, or Aleier, acquired substantially all of the assets and
assumed specified liabilities of Caver-Morehead Systems, Inc., or Caver-Morehead, in an all-cash transaction valued at $4.0 million. $2.0 million of the purchase price is subject to an earn-out agreement that entitles Caver-Moreheads former
shareholders to receive additional consideration upon the achievement by Aleier of certain margin targets. If earned, these deferred payments will be made in two installments in February 2007 and February 2008, subject to reduction as described in
the Merger Agreement. There was no payment in February 2007, but a total payment of $2.0 million could still be paid in February 2008. The earn-out will be recognized and recorded in a future period when earned.

The following table summarizes the purchase price (in thousands):



|                                                     |  |   |      
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Cash to Caver-Morehead shareholders                  |  | $ | 1,649
|Cash to Caver-Morehead acquisition consultants       |  |   | 151  
|Note to Caver-Morehead shareholders                  |  |   | 118  
|Direct acquisition costs of the business combination |  |   | 99   
|                                                     |  |   |      
|Total before potential future earn-out               |  |   | 2,017
|Potential future earn-out                            |  |   | 2,000
|                                                     |  |   |      
|Total potential purchase price                       |  | $ | 4,017
|                                                     |  |   |      

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price, before potential future earn-out, to the
estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of September 1, 2006 in accordance with SFAS141 Business Combinations(in thousands):



|                          |  |   |      
|------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Current assets            |  | $ | 204  
|Property and equipment    |  |   | 80   
|Goodwill                  |  |   | 386  
|Acquisition intangibles   |  |   | 2,068
|                          |  |   |      
|Total assets acquired     |  |   | 2,738
|Current liabilities       |  |   | 166  
|Notes payable             |  |   | 555  
|                          |  |   |      
|Total liabilities assumed |  |   | 721  
|                          |  |   |      
|Net assets acquired       |  | $ | 2,017
|                          |  |   |      

The pro forma consolidated financial information below for the comparable quarter of the prior year does not
include any Caver-Morehead data because it is considered immaterial.

Cirronet Inc.

In September 2006, we completed our acquisition of Cirronet Inc. The purchase price was a total of $25.2 million, assuming all contingent payments are earned and paid.
The effective date for including operations and reporting as a subsidiary of RFM was September 1, 2006.

As indicated above, part of the purchase
price is contingent. Pursuant to an earn-out agreement, Cirronets former shareholders and option holders may receive up to $4.8 million upon the achievement by Cirronet of certain sales and margin targets. If earned, the contingent payment is
scheduled to be made in cash on November 1, 2007, subject to reduction as described in the Cirronet Merger Agreement. The earn-out will be recognized and recorded in a future period when earned.



-13-



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the purchase price (share and dollar amounts in thousands):



|                                                                        |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Cash to Cirronet shareholders                                           |  | $ | 7,451 
|Note to Cirronet shareholders                                           |  |   | 3,000 
|Value of 709 shares of RFM common stock issued to Cirronet shareholders |  |   | 4,298 
|Value of 1,089 RFM stock options issued to Cirronet option holders      |  |   | 5,174 
|Direct acquisition costs of the business combination                    |  |   | 443   
|                                                                        |  |   |       
|Total before potential future earn-out                                  |  |   | 20,366
|Potential future earn-out                                               |  |   | 4,800 
|                                                                        |  |   |       
|Total potential purchase price                                          |  | $ | 25,166
|                                                                        |  |   |       

The following table summarizes the allocation of purchase price, before potential future earn-out, to the
estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of September 1, 2006 in accordance with SFAS 141 Business Combinations(in thousands):



|                          |  |   |       
|------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Current assets            |  | $ | 3,454 
|Property and equipment    |  |   | 454   
|Goodwill                  |  |   | 8,597 
|Acquisition intangibles   |  |   | 9,507 
|Other assets              |  |   | 238   
|                          |  |   |       
|Total assets acquired     |  |   | 22,250
|Current liabilities       |  |   | 1,606 
|Capital lease obligations |  |   | 161   
|Notes payable             |  |   | 117   
|                          |  |   |       
|Total liabilities assumed |  |   | 1,884 
|                          |  |   |       
|Net assets acquired       |  | $ | 20,366
|                          |  |   |       

The following pro forma consolidated financial information presents the comparable quarter of the prior year and
the prior year-to-date each ending February 28, 2006 as if the Cirronet merger had occurred on September 1, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):



|                       |  |                                     |        |   |                                   |   |        |  
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | ------ | - | --------------------------------- | - | ------ | -
|                       |  | Three Months EndedFebruary 28, 2006 |        |   | Six Months EndedFebruary 28, 2006 |  
|Revenues               |  | $                                   | 15,492 |   |                                   | $ | 31,413 |  
|Net loss               |  | $                                   | (497   | ) |                                   | $ | (905   | )
|Basic loss per share   |  | $                                   | (0.06  | ) |                                   | $ | (0.10  | )
|Diluted loss per share |  | $                                   | (0.06  | ) |                                   | $ | (0.10  | )



-14-



---

##### Table of Contents

Intangible Asset Amortization

The composition of our acquired intangible assets for the two acquisitions described above and the associated accumulated amortization as of February 28, 2007 are as follows:



|                                                |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- | ------ | ----------------------------- | - | ----------------------- |  | - | ------
|                                                |  |                                      |  | Six Months ended February 28, 2007
|                                                |  | WeightedAverageRemainingLife inYears |  | GrossCarryingAmount($000)          |        | AccumulatedAmortization($000) |   | NetCarryingAmount($000)
|Intangible assets subject to amortization:      |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|Technology                                      |  | 7                                    |  | $                                  | 8,700  |                               | $ | 582                     |  | $ | 8,118 
|Customer base                                   |  | 8                                    |  |                                    | 1,473  |                               |   | 82                      |  |   | 1,391 
|Other                                           |  | 1                                    |  |                                    | 142    |                               |   | 54                      |  |   | 88    
|                                                |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|Total intangible assets subject to amortization |  |                                      |  | $                                  | 10,315 |                               | $ | 718                     |  | $ | 9,597 
|                                                |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|Intangible assets not subject to amortization:  |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|Trademarks                                      |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  | $ | 1,260 
|                                                |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       
|Total intangible assets                         |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  | $ | 10,857
|                                                |  |                                      |  |                                    |        |                               |   |                         |  |   |       

The aggregate amount of amortization expense for the six months ended February 28, 2007 was approximately
$718,000. Estimated amortization expense for each of our four fiscal years ending August 31, 2007 through 2011 is as follows:



|                               |  |              |      
|------------------------------ |  | ------------ | -----
|Estimated Amortization Expense |  | Amount($000)
|August 31, 2007                |  | $            | 1,418
|August 31, 2008                |  |              | 1,310
|August 31, 2009                |  |              | 1,209
|August 31, 2010                |  |              | 1,154
|August 31, 2011                |  |              | 1,154



|ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following discussion may be understood more fully by reference to the financial statements, notes to the financial statements, and managements
discussion and analysis contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

General

RF Monolithics, Inc., or RFM, was organized in 1979 as a Texas corporation and converted to a Delaware corporation
in 1994. We design, develop, manufacture and market a broad range of wireless products and services that are solution-driven and technology-enabled. We have two lines of business  Wireless Solutions and Wireless Components.



-15-



---

##### Table of Contents

Our Wireless Solutions business includes Virtual Wire Short-range Radio, Radio Frequency Integrated
Circuits, or RFIC, and Module Products. These are miniature radios and the networks that manage and use them. Our goal is to provide customers with a comprehensive solution with a wide variety of alternative products and services for their wireless
network applications. These product offerings were enhanced by two acquisitions that were consummated in September, 2006. RFM acquired Cirronet Inc., or Cirronet, and the business of Caver-Morehead Systems, Inc., or Caver-Morehead (which was
acquired by Aleier, Inc., or Aleier, a wholly-owned subsidiary of RFM). See footnote 10 to the financial statements for additional information on these transactions. Radios are marketed under the RFM brand. Standard and custom radio modules and
packaged radio and network gateway products are marketed under the Cirronet brand. Asset management platform software and end-applications formerly sold by Caver-Morehead are marketed under the Aleier brand.

Our Wireless Components business includes low-power components, frequency control modules and filters and is marketed under the RFM brand. Our goal is to
provide simple, cost effective solutions that fit our customers specialty applications.

Executive Summary

We operate in two different environments in our two business groups. The Wireless Component business is characterized by a very competitive environment
that has declining average selling prices and frequent product innovation. Arrayed against us are several large competitors who have superior financial and other resources. We have competed successfully for 27 years by cultivating close customer
relationships with a diverse group of customers in varied applications, markets and geographic locations. In contrast, our Wireless Solutions business is characterized as a developing market with only a generalized definition of products, services,
markets and applications. Competition is not well defined and consists of much smaller competitors.

Our strengths include: (a) our
ability to identify and capitalize on trends in a rapidly growing wireless marketplace; (b) our capability to develop products and services that have superior technical characteristics; (c) our expertise to assist our customers in
incorporating our products into their applications; and (d) our demonstrated ability to manufacture high quality cost-effective products in volume with short lead times. Our manufacturing capabilities are greatly enhanced by our relationships
with several domestic and offshore contractors.

Our base Wireless Components business has declined in sales due to decreased average
selling prices in several intensely competitive markets and loss of market share to competing technologies. As a result, we have focused our product and market developments on products for our Wireless Solutions business which we feel offer a
technical edge and have greater gross margin potential. A key factor in our sales performance is whether or not we develop and sell enough new products to offset the decline in selling price and unit volume of our older products. Overall economic
conditions in the electronics industry, which has historically experienced extreme increases and decreases in demand within short periods of time, is another key factor that influences our sales performance. We believe our markets are currently in a
period of stable to increasing overall demand, depending on the market involved. A key factor in our gross margin performance is whether or not we can reduce our costs (through innovation and increased volume) and improve our product mix towards
higher margin products to offset expected declines in average selling prices. The Cirronet and Caver-Morehead acquisitions implement our strategy to grow sales with new products that have higher margin potential.

We have systematically increased our operating expenses to support our Wireless Solutions initiative and that has somewhat increased our sales breakeven
point. Despite increased operating expenses, we have normally generated positive cash flows in recent periods. See the Liquidity section below of this report for



-16-



---

##### Table of Contents

discussion of cash flows for the current period. While we intend to continue some level of positive cash flows in future periods, the amount of positive cash
flow may decrease or occasionally turn negative due to fluctuating revenues or the need for increased working capital to support increased sales or increased capital spending and other investments to support growth programs. We feel we currently
have the financial resources necessary to execute our business plans.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required
to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the periods presented. We described our most significant accounting policies, which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating reported financial results, in
our Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2006 on Form 10-K. Those policies continue to be our most critical accounting policies for the period covered by this filing. Additional accounting policies
related to our current year acquisitions are as follows:

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We have adopted Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, or SFAS 142, which
requires companies to stop amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. We review goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually and upon occurrence of any event that indicates
potential impairments. In accordance with SFAS 142 we perform an annual impairment review during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.

SFAS 142 prescribes a two-phase process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first phase screens for potential impairment, while the second phase (if necessary), measures the impairment. Goodwill is potentially impaired if the net book
value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. We have a single reporting unit, as defined by SFAS 142, for purposes of analyzing goodwill. In calculating the impairment charges, the fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a
discounted cash flow methodology. The significant assumptions used in these calculations include discount rates, estimated future growth rates and operating margins. A change in any of these assumptions could significantly impact the estimated fair
value of the reporting unit. SFAS 142 also requires that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying value. We estimate the fair value of these intangibles assets using an income
approach. We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than the carrying value.

Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, we record
impairment losses on long-lived assets when events and circumstances indicate that such assets are not recoverable and impaired such that the estimated fair value of the asset is less than its recorded amount. Conditions that would necessitate an
impairment assessment include material adverse changes in operations (such as happened in the current quarter), significant adverse differences in actual results in comparison with initial valuation forecasts prepared at the time of acquisition, a
decision to abandon acquired products, services or technologies, or other significant adverse changes that would indicate the carrying amount of the recorded asset might not be recoverable.



-17-



---

##### Table of Contents

We review our long-lived assets and certain intangible assets for impairment on a quarterly basis or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is generally measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted pre-tax
future net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets estimated using discounted cash flows.

Segments

We reviewed the requirements of SFAS
131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, concerning segment reporting with regard to our recent acquisitions as described in footnote 10 of the financial statements. We have concluded that we are still
operating as a single segment and therefore do not need to report separate segment information. We manage the business with a single management team and have no segment managers. The chief operating decision maker reviews operational performance and
makes decisions on the allocation of assets and resources primarily on the basis of consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

In this next section we will discuss our financial statements. In this discussion, we will make comparisons between the following
periods, which we believe are relevant to understanding trends in our business:



| |  |  | The current quarter and current year-to-date period, each ended February 28, 2007, of the fiscal year ending August 31, 2007, in comparison to the
comparable quarter of the prior year and prior year-to-date period, each ended February 28, 2006.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Certain comparisons with the three months ended November 30, 2006 (previous quarter) are provided where we believe it is useful to the understanding of trends.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The selected financial data for the periods presented may not be indicative of our future financial condition or results
of operations.



-18-



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table illustrates operating results for the four quarters of fiscal 2006 and the first two quarters of
fiscal 2007 (in thousands, except percentage data). These figures will be used when discussing trends in the following section.



|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------ | - | ------------------------ | - | ------ | ------ |  | - | ------- | - |  | ------- | ------ | - | ------- | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                  |  | Fiscal 2006Quarter Ended |        |   | Fiscal 2007Quarter Ended |  
|                                  |  | Nov. 30                  |        |   | Feb. 28                  |   |        | May 31 |  |   | Aug. 31 |   |  | Nov. 30 |        |   | Feb. 28 |  
|Sales by product area:            |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Virtual Wire Radio products (1)  |  | $                        | 3,437  |   |                          | $ | 3,598  |        |  | $ | 3,796   |   |  | $       | 3,394  |   |         | $ | 4,010  |   |  | $ | 2,754  |  
|Cirronet and Aleier brand         |  |                          |       |   |                          |   |       |        |  |   |        |   |  |         |       |   |         |   | 3,141  |   |  |   | 3,370  |  
|Filters                           |  |                          | 4,758  |   |                          |   | 4,824  |        |  |   | 6,522   |   |  |         | 5,982  |   |         |   | 4,440  |   |  |   | 3,705  |  
|Frequency control modules         |  |                          | 511    |   |                          |   | 1,160  |        |  |   | 1,133   |   |  |         | 1,425  |   |         |   | 1,686  |   |  |   | 619    |  
|Low-power components              |  |                          | 3,590  |   |                          |   | 3,111  |        |  |   | 3,245   |   |  |         | 3,676  |   |         |   | 2,526  |   |  |   | 1,900  |  
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total Sales                       |  |                          | 12,296 |   |                          |   | 12,693 |        |  |   | 14,696  |   |  |         | 14,477 |   |         |   | 15,803 |   |  |   | 12,348 |  
|Cost of sales (2)                 |  |                          | 8,978  |   |                          |   | 8,906  |        |  |   | 10,428  |   |  |         | 10,502 |   |         |   | 10,226 |   |  |   | 9,713  |  
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Gross profit                      |  |                          | 3,318  |   |                          |   | 3,787  |        |  |   | 4,268   |   |  |         | 3,975  |   |         |   | 5,577  |   |  |   | 2,635  |  
|% of sales                        |  |                          | 27.0   | % |                          |   | 29.8   | %      |  |   | 29.0    | % |  |         | 27.5   | % |         |   | 35.3   | % |  |   | 21.3   | %
|Operating expenses:               |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Research and development          |  |                          | 1,176  |   |                          |   | 1,131  |        |  |   | 1,143   |   |  |         | 1,201  |   |         |   | 2,117  |   |  |   | 2,236  |  
|Sales and marketing               |  |                          | 1,492  |   |                          |   | 1,632  |        |  |   | 1,741   |   |  |         | 1,802  |   |         |   | 2,219  |   |  |   | 1,915  |  
|General and administrative        |  |                          | 750    |   |                          |   | 810    |        |  |   | 886     |   |  |         | 838    |   |         |   | 1,186  |   |  |   | 1,084  |  
|Restructuring                     |  |                          |       |   |                          |   |       |        |  |   |        |   |  |         |       |   |         |   | 236    |   |  |   | 1,201  |  
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total                             |  |                          | 3,418  |   |                          |   | 3,573  |        |  |   | 3,770   |   |  |         | 3,841  |   |         |   | 5,758  |   |  |   | 6,436  |  
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Income (loss) from operations     |  |                          | (100   | ) |                          |   | 214    |        |  |   | 498     |   |  |         | 134    |   |         |   | (181   | ) |  |   | (3,801 | )
|Other income (expense), net       |  |                          | 52     |   |                          |   | (69    | )      |  |   | (68     | ) |  |         | (30    | ) |         |   | (153   | ) |  |   | (175   | )
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes |  |                          | (48    | ) |                          |   | 145    |        |  |   | 430     |   |  |         | 104    |   |         |   | (334   | ) |  |   | (3,976 | )
|Income tax expense                |  |                          | 1      |   |                          |   | 5      |        |  |   | 17      |   |  |         | 27     |   |         |   | 1      |   |  |   | 13     |  
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Net income (loss)                 |  | $                        | (49    | ) |                          | $ | 140    |        |  | $ | 413     |   |  | $       | 77     |   |         | $ | (335   | ) |  | $ | (3,989 | )
|                                  |  |                          |        |   |                          |   |        |        |  |   |         |   |  |         |        |   |         |   |        |   |  |   |        |  



|(1) | Includes RFIC products
|--- | ----------------------



|(2) | Q2 of FY 2007 Includes a $1,198 inventory reserve related to restructuring of Dallas Facilities.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



-19-



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the three and six months ended February 28, 2007, and
February 28, 2006, (a) the percentage relationship of certain items from our statements of operations to sales and (b) the percentage change in these items between the current period and the comparable period of the prior year:



|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | -- |  | ---------------------------- | - |  | -------------------------- | - |  | ------------------------ | - |  | ------------ | -- |  | ------------ | --
|                             |  | Percentage of Total Sales      |    |  | Percentage Change From       |  
|                             |  | Three MonthsEnded February 28, |    |  | Six MonthsEnded February 28, |   |  | Three MonthsEnded February |   |  | Six MonthsEnded February |  
|                             |  | 2007                           |    |  | 2006                         |   |  | 2007                       |   |  | 2006                     |   |  | 2006 to 2007 |    |  | 2006 to 2007 |   
|Sales                        |  | 100                            | %  |  | 100                          | % |  | 100                        | % |  | 100                      | % |  | (3           | )% |  | 13           | % 
|Cost of sales                |  | 79                             |    |  | 70                           |   |  | 71                         |   |  | 72                       |   |  | 9            |    |  | 12           |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Gross profit                 |  | 21                             |    |  | 30                           |   |  | 29                         |   |  | 28                       |   |  | (30          | )  |  | 16           |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Research and development     |  | 18                             |    |  | 9                            |   |  | 15                         |   |  | 9                        |   |  | 98           |    |  | 89           |   
|Sales and marketing          |  | 15                             |    |  | 13                           |   |  | 15                         |   |  | 13                       |   |  | 17           |    |  | 32           |   
|General and administrative   |  | 9                              |    |  | 6                            |   |  | 8                          |   |  | 6                        |   |  | 34           |    |  | 46           |   
|Restructuring and impairment |  | 10                             |    |  | 0                            |   |  | 5                          |   |  | 0                        |   |  | N/A          |    |  | N/A          |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Total operating expenses     |  | 52                             |    |  | 28                           |   |  | 43                         |   |  | 28                       |   |  | 80           |    |  | 74           |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Income from operations       |  | (31                            | )  |  | 2                            |   |  | (14                        | ) |  | 0                        |   |  | (1,876       | )  |  | (3,593       | ) 
|Other expense, net           |  | (1                             | )  |  | (1                           | ) |  | (1                         | ) |  | 0                        |   |  | 154          |    |  | 1,829        |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Income before income taxes   |  | (32                            | )  |  | 1                            |   |  | (15                        | ) |  | 0                        |   |  | (2,842       | )  |  | (4,543       | ) 
|Income tax expense           |  | 0                              |    |  | 0                            |   |  | 0                          |   |  | 0                        |   |  | 160          |    |  | 133          |   
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   
|Net income                   |  | (32                            | )% |  | 1                            | % |  | 0                          | % |  | 0                        | % |  | (2,949       | )% |  | (4,851       | )%
|                             |  |                                |    |  |                              |   |  |                            |   |  |                          |   |  |              |    |  |              |   

Sales

Overall Sales Trends for the Current Quarter Compared to the Prior Year and Previous Quarter

Total sales decreased
3% in the current quarter compared to the comparable quarter of the prior year and decreased 22% from the previous quarter. The primary reason for the decrease in both periods was a decrease in the number of units sold in each of our legacy products
lines. In contrast, sales of the Cirronet and Aleier brands (acquired in September) increased 7% from the first quarter (see footnote 10 of the financial statements for further information on these acquisitions) due to an increased number of units
sold for these Wireless Solutions products.

The decreased number of units sold for the legacy products was due to several reasons,
including a decline in shipments to the satellite radio supply chain, decreased automobile production rates and seasonal factors that lowered production rates to our customers around the world. The seasonal factors were especially evident for the
Virtual Wire Short-range Radio and frequency control module product lines as several major customers had very high production rates in the first quarter, but had much lower rates of production in the current quarter that were lower than
normal. We do not believe we have lost significant market share for these legacy products, but economic and seasonal factors had substantial adverse effects in the current quarter. Individual product line sales trends are discussed in more detail in
the section entitled Product Line Sales Trends below.

During the quarter we announced a restructuring that is intended to make
these legacy products more competitive, even at lower sales levels. We will eliminate manufacturing operations in our Dallas facility over the next two quarters. This was an acceleration of our plan to move our operations to a fabless
business model. We have previously had success in moving most of our assembly operations offshore. We believe this restructuring will generate savings of approximately $5 million in our next fiscal year.



-20-



---

##### Table of Contents

We have experienced a reduction in sales for our Wireless Component Group in recent years due to a
decrease in average selling prices and other factors. We have anticipated this trend for some time. As a result, for several years we have focused our product and market development efforts on Wireless Solutions Group products with greater potential
for growth and higher technical content, which allows them to be sold with higher gross margins. Our recent acquisitions are an example of this strategy. One of the biggest factors in determining what happens to total sales in the future will be
whether or not the anticipated growth in Wireless Solutions Group products and services will be greater than or less than the anticipated decline in sales for our Wireless Component Group products.

Another factor contributing to lower sales was ongoing declines in average selling prices for some of our more mature products which are sold in very
competitive markets. In comparison to the comparable quarter of the prior year, low-power components and Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products experienced 11% and 7% decreases in average selling prices, respectively. Filter products actually
experienced a slight increase in average selling prices in comparison to the prior year, but that was due to the mix of product shipped within the product line rather than any change in prices to specific customers. We continue to compete in several
price-sensitive markets (such as the automotive and satellite radio markets) in which customers require decreased prices over time to maintain their business. In addition, we understand that as new products ramp up in volume our customers expect
economies of scale to result in lower pricing. We have achieved significant market position in most of the markets on which we focus. However, we believe that price competition from much larger and better financed competitors represents a
significant risk in maintaining our sales levels and gross margins, particularly in the automotive and consumer markets. A decline in average selling prices adversely impacts gross margin, as well as sales. For a discussion of strategies for
sustaining gross profit, see Gross Profit below.

Our sales success is highly dependent on the following factors: (1) achieving
technological advances in our product design and manufacturing capabilities; (2) our ability to sell our products in a competitive marketplace that can be influenced by outside factors, such as economic and regulatory conditions;
(3) competition from alternative technologies or from competitors duplicating our technologies; and (4) the impact of competitive pricing. These and other factors may adversely affect our ability to grow or even maintain our sales levels.

We have put forth considerable effort developing new products. However, the timing of any sales resulting from new products is dependent
upon the customers product development and product introduction cycles. It is difficult for us to predict when, or if, new products will have a significant impact on our sales. We have seen that consumer applications are often part of special
promotional programs by our customers, so sales to those customers will tend to fluctuate with the timing of those programs.

We have
experienced sudden increases in demand in the past, which have put pressure on our manufacturing facilities and those of our domestic and offshore contractors to increase capacity to meet this demand. In addition, new products sometimes require
different manufacturing processes than we currently possess. We may not be able to increase our manufacturing capacity, the manufacturing capacity of our assembly contractors, or improve our manufacturing processes in a timely manner so as to take
advantage of increased market demand. Failure to do this could result in a material loss of potential sales.

Year-to-Date Sales Trends

Sales for the current year-to-date period increased approximately $3.2 million or 13% over the prior comparable year-to-date
period. The primary reason for this was the $6.3 million increase in Wireless Solutions Group sales, most of which are due to the acquisitions of Cirronet and Aleier. This reflects our significant strategic investments in and efforts to increase
sales for these products. Partially offsetting these increases was a $3.1 million decrease in sales for the Wireless Component Group, due to a decrease in the



-21-



---

##### Table of Contents

number of units sold. This decrease in number of units sold was primarily due to decreased sales to automotive and satellite radio markets, due to reduced
production rates of products for end customers in those markets. In addition, low-power components and filter products lines experienced a reduction in average selling prices of 6% to 7%, which we believe are typical for these products.

Product Line Sales Trends:

Wireless Solutions Group

Wireless Systems

In the
past couple of years, we have invested considerable resources in product and marketing development to support our strategic plan for the Wireless Solutions business. Our Wireless Solutions business is focused on the potential $8 billion market for
embedded modules and similar products. We believe the key to capturing this market will be the ability to provide a wide variety of products, protocol firmware, software and design services and deliver the optimum solution for a given
customers application.

To accelerate our efforts in this area, we acquired both Cirronet and Aleier in the previous quarter. See
Note 10 of the financial statements for the financial details. Cirronet provides longer range modules, as well as gateway and network bridge products to connect different network types to one another. With the Cirronet acquisition, we believe we are
in position to offer the broadest ranges of radios, modules and protocols in the industry. To our knowledge, no one else combines such a broad line of radio offerings with a value added software application. To help customers take full advantage of
the wealth of new data provided by low-power radio systems, Aleier provides enterprise level software for tracking assets and managing workflows related to those assets. The Aleier platform is web architected and modularized for maximum flexibility
in adapting it to specific customer requirements.

We have developed three FCC certified standard products and completed a great deal of
work on custom development contracts for this market, which includes starting the production phase for one of the contracts. Besides a variety of radio products, we use several communication protocol systems to manage point-to-point,
point-to-multipoint or mesh wireless sensor networks. Our sales force is now working with customers to design these products into their applications. In the current quarter, legacy RFM Wireless Systems sales are included in Cirronet and Aleier brand
products, reflecting how these products are managed. This group of products increased more than 5% over the previous quarter, reflecting increased sales to several major customers, including the City of Los Angeles for a software project.

While we see great potential for Wireless Systems products and services, it is difficult for us to predict when, or if, these products
will have a significant additional impact on our sales.

Virtual WireShort-range Radio products

Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products sales in the current quarter decreased 20% in comparison to the comparable quarter of
the prior year, and 31% from the previous quarter. The decrease in sales of Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products in the current quarter over both periods primarily resulted from a decrease in the number of units sold of 14% compared to the
previous year and 32% compared to the previous quarter. In comparison to the previous record quarter for sales of these products, customers in several applications were at relatively low production levels, including customers in medical and remote
access applications. We believe this is due more to seasonal factors than any loss of market share. We anticipate that production levels for these products will return to normal levels in coming quarters.



-22-



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition to a lower number of units sold in the current quarter, there was a 7% decrease in average
selling prices from the comparable quarter of the prior year, as competitive conditions forced us to lower prices. There was a small increase in average selling prices in the current quarter compared to the previous quarter, due to a product mix
that had a relatively larger amount of sales to medical applications.

We have devoted significant resources to developing and marketing
new Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products. We believe these products offer potential for significant growth in sales in numerous wireless applications, particularly for applications that require small size and low power consumption. We
intend to continue working with our customers to develop new applications using Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products and we expect future sales increases for these products. We recently announced the launch of our third generation of this
product, which will add several new features and will be available for sale in fiscal 2007. In addition, we announced a new line of RFIC products, including receivers, transmitters and transceivers. We are not certain when, if ever, these new
products will significantly impact future sales.

Wireless Components Group

Filters

Sales of filter products decreased 23% from the comparable
quarter of the prior year and 17% from the previous quarter. The sales decrease in comparison to both periods was primarily due to a decreased number of units sold of 24% from the comparable quarter of the prior year and 29% from the previous
quarter.

These unit shipment decreases were primarily due to a significant slowdown in sales for satellite radio applications. We provide
filters for both Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (NASDAQ:SIRI) and XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:XMSR). For the past several quarters, there has been a slowdown in the rate of new subscriptions to satellite radio services due to competitive
forces in this market and the supply channel has struggled to adjust to lower production requirements. In addition, both satellite radio service providers were negatively impacted by FCC actions that took several versions of their products off the
market until changes were made eliminating electronic interference, particularly for portable consumer versions of the radio. Regulatory actions which negatively impact the satellite radio market could have a material adverse effect on our sales. We
dont believe we are losing market share for satellite radio products. While we believe that filter sales for the satellite radio application will eventually increase from the currently depressed level, it is uncertain how soon that will happen
or the extent of recovery.

Partially offsetting these declines was an increase in sales for several products serving the Chinese
telecommunications market. Sales to this application increased approximately $300,000 from the previous quarter. The resulting change in product mix within the filter product line was one of the reasons that average selling prices actually increased
significantly from the previous quarter. However, the increase in average selling prices was offset by a corresponding increase in unit costs, as the telecommunications products come in larger, more expensive packages.

A difficulty we face for filter products is the ongoing trend of lower average selling prices. Competitive conditions for these products have forced us
to provide lower prices to maintain our position. The automotive and consumer markets tend to be more price competitive than the other markets we serve. We expect the general trend of lower average selling prices will continue to have an adverse
effect on future sales and margins, and this trend may result in lower overall sales of filter products in the immediate future. For a discussion of strategies for sustaining gross profit, see Gross Profit below.



-23-



---

##### Table of Contents

Frequency Control Modules

Sales of frequency control products decreased 47% from the comparable quarter of the prior year and 63% from the previous quarter. The decrease in both years was primarily due to a decreased number of units sold to
customers in high-end computer and internet infrastructure markets. These markets are subject to volatile changes due to economic conditions in the telecommunications market and production rates at several major contract manufacturers. In contrast
to the previous quarter when production rates were at very high levels at the contract manufacturers, current quarter run rates were very depressed. Future sales of these products will be highly dependent upon economic conditions in the markets
these products serve. Pressures on average selling prices for frequency control module products are not nearly as great as in some of our other markets. We do not expect to see significant changes in sales levels for these products in the immediate
future.

Low-power Components

Sales of low-power components declined 39% from the comparable quarter of the prior year and 25% from the previous quarter. In both cases, the decrease from the prior period was primarily due to a decrease in the number of units sold. The
reduction in the number of low-power component units sold was primarily due to a continuing decline in sales for some of our mature products, including products for the tire pressure monitoring and remote keyless entry applications. Many of our
products sold into this application are based on mature technology and conversion to other technologies such as multiple function integrated circuits and phase locked loops has been going on for years. In addition, some customers have switched to
very low-priced competitors. Another reason for the decline in the current quarter was a reduction in base production schedules at several of our customers supporting North American auto production, including the impact of extensive holiday shut
downs.

We have focused our sales efforts for low-power components on market niches where our total solution is valued by the customer. In
addition, we continue to provide additional package options and seek general cost reductions to remain competitive. Although we think sales of low-power components may continue to decline, we believe we can maintain considerable market share in the
niches we are targeting.

The primary market for these products is the automotive market, which is characterized by very competitive
conditions and declining average selling prices. Average selling prices for low-power components decreased approximately 11%, both in comparison to the prior year and the previous quarter. Smaller package styles, which also are offered at lower
prices, are taking an increasing market share. We expect the trend of lower average selling prices for low-power component products to continue, as competitive market conditions require future price reductions.

We expect that the trend of lower sales for low-power components will continue into this fiscal year, due to continued reduction in average selling
prices, continued conversion of customers away from older products to alternative technologies and generally low North American automotive production levels. During the year, sales of low-power components products fluctuated with changes in
production schedules for automotive customers. We expect this fluctuation to continue.



-24-



---

##### Table of Contents

Other Sales Trends

The following table provides additional data concerning our sales:



|                                             |  |                     |   |  |                   |   |  |                 |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | ----------------- | - |  | --------------- | -
|                                             |  | Percentage of Sales |  
|                                             |  | CurrentQuarter      |   |  | ComparableQuarter |   |  | PreviousQuarter |  
|Sales to top five customers                  |  | 35                  | % |  | 45                | % |  | 37              | %
|Distribution sales                           |  | 23                  | % |  | 26                | % |  | 25              | %
|Number of customers310% of our sales
revenue |  | One                 |   |  | Two               |   |  | Two             |  
|Sales to customers310% of our sales
revenue  |  | 14                  | % |  | 22                | % |  | 27              | %
|International sales                          |  | 39                  | % |  | 51                | % |  | 46              | %

One customer, Delphi Corporation, or Delphi, accounted for more than 10% of sales in the current
quarter, while there were two in the comparable quarter and the previous quarter. Delphi is currently in Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings and involved in negotiations with its labor unions. While we are encouraged by the reported progress in
those negotiations, a protracted strike in the North American automotive industry could have a material adverse effect on our operations.The decreases in the ratio of sales to the top five customers and international sales are largely a
result of our recent acquisitions, which diversified our customer base. Our strategy is to seek diversification in our sales. We believe we have achieved a significant level of diversification in our customers, markets, products and geographic
areas. However, due to the very competitive nature of the markets in which we compete, we may not always be able to achieve such diversification.

We consider all product sales with a delivery destination outside North America to be international sales. International sales are denominated primarily in U.S. currency, although some European customers require that we sell in Euros. We
have not entered into any hedging activities to mitigate the exchange risk associated with sales in foreign currency. We intend to continue our focus on international sales. We anticipate that international sales will continue to represent a
significant portion of our business. However, international sales are subject to fluctuations as a result of local economic conditions and competition. Therefore, we cannot predict whether we will be able to continue to derive similar levels of our
business from international sales.

Amortization of Acquisition Costs

In the previous quarter we acquired the business of Cirronet and Aleier, as described in footnote 10 of the financial statements. This resulted in recording approximately $10.9 million of assets that are required to
be amortized on a straight-line basis over various lives, such as intangible technology and other assets, increased value of fixed assets and a stepped up valuation of inventory. The amortization of these costs is a non-cash expense. The
amortization of acquisition costs resulted in recording additional expense as follows (in thousands):



-25-



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                      |  |                                     |     |                                   |   |    
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------- | - | ---
|                                      |  | Three months endedFebruary 28, 2007 |     | Six months endedFebruary 28, 2007
|Cost of Sales                         |  | $                                   | 95  |                                   | $ | 191
|Research and development expense      |  |                                     | 298 |                                   |   | 596
|Sales and marketing expense           |  |                                     | 47  |                                   |   | 93 
|General and adminsistrative expense   |  |                                     | 16  |                                   |   | 32 
|                                      |  |                                     |     |                                   |   |    
|Total additional amortization expense |  | $                                   | 456 |                                   | $ | 912
|                                      |  |                                     |     |                                   |   |    

We expect to record similar amounts of acquisition costs for the remainder of the fiscal year.

Stock Compensation Expense

We adopted
FASB Statement 123(R) for our fiscal year beginning September 1, 2005, or fiscal 2006. Most of the expense that was recorded in fiscal 2006 related to the unvested portion of stock grants that were made in prior years. In fiscal 2006, we also
switched to restricted stock units, or RSUs, as our primary stock compensation vehicle in lieu of stock options, to better match the employees perceived benefit with the financial statement cost. Also, RSUs result in less dilution and, as we
have implemented them, less expense. Most of our stock compensation expense in the current year relates to RSUs.

A summary of stock
compensation expense is as follows:



|                                  |  |                                 |     |                               |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------- | - | ---- |  | ---- | --- |  | - | ---
|                                  |  | Compensation Expense Recognized
|                                  |  | Three months ended February 28, |     | Six months ended February 28,
|                                  |  | 2007                            |     | 2006                          |   | 2007 |  | 2006
|Cost of Sales                     |  | $                               | 17  |                               | $ | 58   |  | $    | 32  |  | $ | 112
|Research and Development expense  |  |                                 | 12  |                               |   | 28   |  |      | 21  |  |   | 52 
|Sales & Marketing expense         |  |                                 | 29  |                               |   | 43   |  |      | 52  |  |   | 80 
|General & Adminiistrative expense |  |                                 | 57  |                               |   | 64   |  |      | 105 |  |   | 123
|                                  |  |                                 |     |                               |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    
|                                  |  | $                               | 115 |                               | $ | 193  |  | $    | 210 |  | $ | 367
|                                  |  |                                 |     |                               |   |      |  |      |     |  |   |    

We expect to record slightly larger amounts of stock compensation expense for the remainder of the
fiscal year as new grants are added to existing ones. We intend to continue to use various stock plans as an important part of our compensation package. We are competing for talent with other companies that have stock plans in place and our work
force values stock as a form of compensation.

Gross Profit

Overall Gross Profit Trends for Current Quarter Compared to the Prior Year and Previous Quarter

The current quarter
gross margin of 21.3% was a decrease from the 29.8% in the comparable quarter of the prior year and 35.3% in the previous quarter. The primary reason for the reduction from both periods was an increase in our inventory reserve of $1,198,000 related
to our recently announced restructuring that will eliminate our Dallas manufacturing facility. The reserve is needed to record the estimated impairment of value for inventory that will no longer be needed because of the transition offshore. This
includes the rationalization of product variations needed to accomplish the transition. This increase in the reserve amounted to 9.7% of sales, so gross margins for the current quarter without the impact of this reserve would have resulted in a
gross margin of 31%.



-26-



---

##### Table of Contents

A favorable impact on gross margin in comparison to the comparable quarter of the prior year was a
favorable change in product mix, including the impact of the recent acquisitions. Due to their higher technical content, our Wireless Solutions and frequency control products have higher potential gross margins than our commodity-type products such
as filters and low-power components. The acquired companies have gross margins comparable to other Wireless Solutions products. The higher margin products accounted for 54% of total sales in the current quarter, compared to only 37% of total sales
in the comparable quarter of the prior year. Product mix was a slightly negative factor in comparison to the previous quarter, as these products amounted to 56% of sales in that quarter. In particular, Virtual Wire Short-range Radio products
and frequency control products were at very high levels in the previous quarter.

An unfavorable gross margin factor for our legacy product
lines in the current quarter was an increase in per unit manufacturing costs. Production volume was much lower for the Dallas manufacturing facilities, so the relatively high fixed costs of that facility (including depreciation on fixed assets) was
spread over fewer units, increasing the cost per unit. We do not believe that this situation will change significantly in the near future, therefore we accelerated our long range plan to move all production of the Dallas facility offshore resulting
in a fabless business model. This transition will take several quarters, but we believe this should be completed early enough in our fiscal year 2008 to achieve approximately $5 million per year in savings resulting in our legacy products being more
competitive.

Another unfavorable impact on gross margins in the current quarter was the ongoing impact of declining average selling
prices. As mentioned in the sales section, most of our legacy product lines experienced decreases in average selling prices from prior periods due to competitive conditions. The restructuring effort mentioned in the previous paragraph is intended to
address the pressure on gross margins by lowering manufacturing costs.

Overall Gross Profit Trends for Current Year Compared to the Prior Year

The current year-to-date gross margin was 29.2%, which is an increase from the gross margin of 28.4% last year. This is despite the
increase in inventory reserve of $1,198,000. Without these costs, gross margins would have been 33.4%. The primary reason for the increase in gross margin in the current year is the impact of favorable product mix that was described in the previous
section. Sales of the high margin products were 55% of sales in the current year, compared to only 35% in the comparable year-to-date period.

As mentioned in the sales section, many of the legacy product lines experienced a reduction in average selling prices of 5% to 7%. In most cases, we were able to achieve reductions in manufacturing costs per unit that were equal to or more
than the selling price impact. However, in the current quarter we saw that this was getting more difficult for those products that relied substantially on manufacturing operations in Dallas, therefore we decided to restructure those operations to
reduce cost.

Factors Influencing Gross Margins

Our gross margin continues to be influenced by several factors, both favorable and unfavorable. The favorable factors that influence gross margin represent our long-term efforts to improve gross margins. The most
significant of these factors is our effort to improve product mix by focusing resources on those products that have higher potential gross margins. Products such as Wireless Systems, Virtual Wire and frequency control modules have a greater
long-term potential for gross margins than the very price-sensitive low-power component and filter products. A shift in sales toward these products has a positive impact on margins, as occurred in this quarter as described in the previous section of
this report. This was one of our primary



-27-



---

##### Table of Contents

motivations in the acquisitions that we completed this year which increased Wireless Solutions sales. While this is our strategy, we cannot assure you that
such an improved product mix will be achieved in future periods. In fact, in the current quarter our product mix shifted unfavorably in relation to the previous quarter, resulting in lower margins.

Another favorable impact is our ongoing effort to reduce per-unit manufacturing costs. Most of our product lines have achieved cost reduction on a
year-over-year per-unit manufacturing cost basis for the past several years. We devote considerable resources to obtaining purchasing savings and in working with our suppliers and outside contractors to improve yields, increase productivity and
improve processes that result in lower costs. Each of our product lines is subject to a decline in average selling prices and we expect this trend to continue, so ongoing cost reduction is crucial to maintaining or improving gross margin. We intend
to continue our efforts to reduce manufacturing costs in future periods. We expect the restructuring effort we announced this quarter will reduce per-unit manufacturing costs for a number of our products significantly.

The biggest negative factor for gross margins, as mentioned in the sales section, is declining average selling prices as a result of competitive
conditions in the markets we serve. In comparison to the prior year, each of our volume product lines experienced a decrease in average selling prices of at least 5% on a year-over-year basis. We expect the trend of lower prices to continue, as
described above in the section discussing Overall Sales Trends for the Current Quarter Compared to the Prior Year and Previous Quarter.

Another negative factor that could occur is the impact that the volume of units sold and produced has when the number of units is decreased and relatively high levels of fixed manufacturing costs are spread over fewer units. Overhead costs
in Cost of Sales include a relatively high amount of fixed manufacturing costs, such as a significant amount of depreciation expense for manufacturing equipment. When volume is reduced, fixed manufacturing costs increase on a per-unit basis,
negatively impacting margins. This occurred in the current quarter. One beneficial effect of the restructuring will be to lower our fixed costs.

Other potential negative impacts we experience only on an occasional basis. One relates to inventory reserves that are necessary when we face major changes in our markets or make major changes in our operations, which in fact happened in
the current quarter. Another relates to start-up costs for new products being entered into the volume manufacturing process. This impact will be greatly reduced when we operate on a fabless business model.

Research and Development Expense

Research and
development expenses were $2,236,000 in the current quarter, compared to $1,131,000 in the comparable quarter of the prior year and $2,117,000 in the previous quarter. The 98% increase from the comparable quarter of the prior year was primarily due
to the impact of the acquisitions. The acquisitions accounted for approximately $850,000 of the $1,105,000 increase from the comparable quarter of the prior year, including $298,000 in amortization of acquisition costs. Research and development
expenses were 18% of sales in the current quarter, up from 9% of sales in the comparable quarter of the prior year. The 6% increase in engineering expense from the previous quarter is consistent with our plan to increase research and development
efforts to develop new products and new processes to manufacture them, primarily for the Wireless Solutions Group.

Year-to-date research
and development expense was $4,353,000 compared to $2,307,000 in the prior year-to-date period. Approximately $1,650,000 of the $2,046,000 increase in these expenses relates to the new acquisitions. The remainder represents our efforts to develop
new products, particularly consulting expenses to assist us in doing this.



-28-



---

##### Table of Contents

We believe that the continued development of our technology and new products is essential to our growth
and success. We are committed to continue to devote significant resources to research and development and expect research and development expenses to remain the same or slightly increase in absolute dollars in the immediate future.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Current quarter sales
and marketing expenses were $1,915,000, compared to $1,632,000 in the comparable quarter of the prior year and $2,219,000 in the previous quarter. This 17% increase from the comparable quarter of the prior year was primarily due to the impact of the
acquisitions. The increase due to the acquisitions was partially offset by a decrease in sales commission expense due to lower sales on legacy products. The acquisitions accounted for approximately $500,000 in increased cost, more than the $283,000
increase from the comparable quarter of the prior year, including $47,000 in amortization of acquisition costs. Sales and marketing expenses were 15% of sales in the current quarter, up from 13% of sales in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
The reduction in cost from the previous quarter was due to a decrease in sales commission expense due to lower sales on legacy products.

Year-to-date sales and marketing expense was $4,134,000 compared to $3,124,000 for the comparable year-to-date period. This 32% increase was almost entirely due to the impact of the acquisitions.

We intend to aggressively try to increase sales in future periods, particularly for Wireless Solutions sales. Therefore we expect to maintain a
relatively high level of sales and marketing expense. We expect to incur comparable or slightly increased sales and marketing expenses in absolute dollars in the immediate future, with the exception of sales commission expenses which will fluctuate
in line with sales levels.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses were $1,084,000 for the current quarter, compared to $810,000 for the comparable quarter of the prior year and $1,185,000 in the previous quarter. This 34% increase over the
comparable period was primarily due to the impact of the acquisitions. The acquisitions accounted for approximately $350,000, more than the $274,000 increase from the comparable quarter of the prior year, including $16,000 in amortization of
acquisition costs. Other costs, such as executive compensation were lower than last year. General and administrative expenses were 9% of sales in the current quarter, up from 6% of sales in the comparable quarter of the prior year. The decrease from
the previous quarter was due to lower legal and executive compensation expenses.

Year-to-date general and administrative expense was
$2,270,000 for the current year, compared to $1,560,000 for the prior year year-to-date period. The net 46% increase in expense resulted from the impact of the acquisitions. We expect to incur comparable or slightly increased general and
administrative expenses in absolute dollars in the immediate future.

Restructuring and Impairment Expense

In the quarter we made the decision to eliminate the Dallas manufacturing facility and move to a fabless business model. That will have the
impact of idling many of the fixed assets that the facility had been using. Therefore we evaluated the relevant fixed assets and set up an impairment reserve to write those assets down to estimated fair value. This was $1,201,000 in the current
quarter. There was no such expense in the prior year. In the previous quarter restructuring expense was $236,000 related to the severance cost for a head count reduction in our Dallas facility. We expect to have additional restructuring cost related
to additional head count reductions of approximately $700,000 over the next three quarters.



-29-



---

##### Table of Contents

Total Operating Expenses

Operating expenses increased $2,863,000 over the prior year and $678,000 over the previous quarter. The acquisitions accounted for approximately $1,700,000 of the increase over the prior year, including $361,000 in
amortization of acquisition costs. Restructuring expenses were an additional $1,201,000 in expense in comparison to the prior year. Increased restructuring expense was the reason operating expenses increased from the previous quarter, partially
offset by lower expenses for other items, such as lower sales commission expense for lower sales.

Year-to-date operating expenses
increased $5,203,000 compared to the prior year-to-date period. $3,500,000 of that was due to the impact of the acquisitions and $1,437,000 was due to restructuring expenses. Due to the impact of our recent acquisitions and our intention to pursue
our Wireless Solutions strategy, we expect to incur comparable or slightly increased operating expenses (other than restructuring expense) in absolute dollars in the immediate future, except for sales commissions expense which will fluctuate with
sales. Restructuring expense for severance costs is expected to be approximately $700,000 over the next three quarters.

Other Income (Expense)

Total other income (expense) was $175,000 (expense) in the current quarter, compared to $69,000 income for the comparable quarter of
the prior year and $153,000 in expense for the previous quarter. The significant increase in expense from the prior year was primarily a result of the use of bank debt to help finance the acquisitions during the previous quarter, as well as the use
of cash balances for the same purpose and the resulting reduction in interest income. We expect to incur comparable or slightly increased other expenses in absolute dollars in the immediate future.

Income Tax Expense

In both the current and prior
years we recorded small provisions for state income tax. We expect to record relatively small income tax provisions in the near future. The Cirronet and Aleier acquisitions did not have a material impact on income tax expense in the current quarter.

Earnings (Loss) per Share

The net
loss for the current quarter was $3,989,000, or $0.44 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $140,000, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the comparable quarter of the prior year and a net loss of $335,000 or $0.04 per diluted share for the
previous quarter. The net loss for the quarter includes $2,402,000 for inventory and fixed asset impairments as discussed in the sections entitled gross profit and restructuring expense, $456,000 amortization of acquisition costs, as discussed under
the section above entitled Amortization of Acquisition Costs and $115,000 in stock compensation expense, as discussed under the section above entitled Stock Compensation Expense. Without asset impairment, amortization and stock compensation charges,
our net income would have increased by a corresponding amount.

Year-to-date net loss was $4,324,000 or $0.48 per diluted share compared to
$91,000 or $0.01 net income per diluted share in the prior comparable period. The net loss for the quarter includes $2,402,000 for inventory and fixed asset impairments as discussed in the sections entitled Gross Profit and Restructuring Expense,
$912,000 amortization of acquisition costs, as discussed under the section above entitled Amortization of Acquisition Costs and $210,000 in stock compensation expense, as discussed under the section above entitled Stock Compensation Expense. Without
asset impairment, amortization and stock compensation charges, our net income would have increased by a corresponding amount.



-30-



---

##### Table of Contents

Financial Condition

Financing Arrangements

On September 1, 2006, our banking agreement was amended and restated to increase the
revolving credit arrangement to a limit of $11.0 million and add a $4.0 million term note facility. The term of the agreement was extended to December 1, 2009. The main purpose of this amended and restated agreement was to help finance the
Cirronet acquisition. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with a portion of the proceeds from our new $15 million credit facility with WFB. The borrowing base for the revolver is based on the combined trade receivables of RFM and its
subsidiaries. Our banking agreement and its status at the end of the current quarter are described in Note 4 to our Financial Statements included in this report.

At February 28, 2007, we maintained access to our revolving line-of-credit, which had a loan balance of $7.3 million. Additional loan advances of approximately $1.5 million were available under our current
borrowing base.

Our revolving line of credit agreement contains financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. We
were in compliance with all covenants as of February 28, 2007, except for the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, which has since been waived. Using our financial forecast, our bank has agreed to amend the loan agreement to avoid a future
covenant violation for the balance of our current fiscal year ending August 31, 2007, the latest date for which a requirement for such covenant is defined. The amendment also will revise our borrowing base calculation effective for our next
quarter in a manner that will reduce our availability by approximately $1.0 to $1.5 million. We are working with our bank to ease the availability restriction as well as exploring other sources of working capital to support our operations.
Consistent with prior years, the loan covenants for our next fiscal year will be reset at the beginning of that year. Should there be a violation of one or more of the financial covenants and we are unable to negotiate a waiver or amendment, the
maturity of our debt could be accelerated.

Liquidity

Liquidity at February 28, 2007, consisted primarily of $2.3 million of cash and $1.5 million available under the banking agreement.

Net cash used in operating activities was $1.2 million for the current year-to-date period as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $0.5 million for the comparable period of the prior year. The
primary reason for decreased cash provided by operations was the fact that the sum of the net loss and non-cash items included in net loss was $0.4 million (positive) in the current year, compared to $1.5 million (positive) in the prior year. Thus
there was a decrease of $1.1 million in operating cash flow due to this factor. Non-cash items included in net loss in the current year that were not in the prior year include $0.9 million in amortization of acquisition costs and $2.4 million in
asset impairments. Our announced restructuring is intended to improve operating income and operating cash flow.

Another negative factor in
the decrease in operating cash flow was $1.6 million in net funds used in working capital items in the current year compared to only $1.0 million in the prior year. A large change was an increase in inventory of $1.2 million in the current year
(excluding the impact of acquisitions and reserves), compared to a $0.4 million reduction in inventory in the prior year. This is a $1.6 million swing in inventory. In addition, accounts payable decreased $1.1 million in the current year, compared
to a $0.5 million increase in the prior year. This is another $1.6 million swing. These working capital items are related. The primary reason for the inventory increase is an increase in finished goods inventory for satellite radio filters due to a
reduction in sales in that volatile market. In the previous quarter, demand suddenly decreased but we were unable to slow down inventory coming from our contractors, as we give them a longer lead time than we provide to our customers to maintain our
competitive position. In the current quarter, we greatly reduced the inflow of finished goods from our contractors, resulting in the reduction in accounts payable. While we worked down inventory $600,000 in the current quarter, we anticipate much
more progress in our third quarter, without a corresponding decrease in accounts payable.



-31-



---

##### Table of Contents

A favorable working capital trend was a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.0 million in the current
year (excluding the impact of acquisitions), compared to an increase of $1.9 million in the prior year. This is a $2.9 million swing that is primarily related to short term swings in sales trends. Collection of our receivables on a
days-sales-outstanding measurement is in the low 50-day range in the current year. Past due accounts remain insignificant and we continued to be within payment terms with our vendors.

While our year-to-date operating cash flow is negative, we did return to positive operating cash flow in the current quarter as we expected
(approximately $800,000). If we meet our guidance and our inventory reduction plans are successful, we expect to continue to have positive operating cash flow for the next several quarters, resulting in positive operating cash flow for the year. We
believe continued positive cash flow, as well as access to our credit facilities, will be sufficient to maintain normal operations for the rest of fiscal 2007.

Cash used in investing activities was $9.3 million for the current year-to-date period, as compared to $1.1 million for the prior year-to-date period. The primary change was that we used $8.6 million in cash (net of
acquired cash) to finance the acquisitions. Capital spending was $0.7 million lower than last year and we expect to acquire only up to $1.0 million of capital equipment by the end of fiscal 2007. We do not believe the acquisitions will be very
capital intensive.

Net cash generated from financing activities was $7.0 million in the current year-to-date period and almost zero in the
prior year-to-date period. The cash generated was from bank loans used to help finance the acquisitions and $0.4 million from employee stock programs, including exercise of stock options from employees of the acquired companies.

As of February 28,2007, we had approximately $1.5 million available in cash under our banking arrangement based upon the borrowing base which is
derived from trade accounts receivable. In addition, approximately $5.8 million more may become available under our banking agreement if our borrowing base were to increase sufficiently to support increased borrowing. We are not able to say when or
if that will happen because of our inability to see very far into the future due to limited lead times on orders placed by our customers.

While we reported positive operating cash flows in recent years, a reduction in sales or gross margins or changes in working capital could occur due to economic or other factors. We believe that cash generated from operations, our cash
balances and the amounts available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the rest of fiscal year 2007. If for any reason these sources of funds are not sufficient to meet our requirements, we may be
required to raise additional funds. We cannot guarantee that we would be able to obtain additional financing or, if available, that it would be available to us on acceptable terms. Should that happen, there could be a significant adverse impact on
our operations.



-32-



---

##### Table of Contents

Stock Options

(a) Stock Option Program Description

Our stock compensation program is a broad-based, long-term retention program
that is intended to attract and retain talented personnel and align stockholder and employee interests. We currently have five plans (2006 Plan, 1999 Plan, 1997 Plan, 1986 Plan and Director Plan) under which we grant or have granted stock options to
employees, directors and consultants. We also assumed stock options granted by Cirronet Inc. which we acquired in September 2006 (see Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements).

The options generally vest at a rate of one forty-eighth each month. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of our stock on the date
of grant and each option generally expires ten years after the date of grant. The 1986 Plan expired for future grants according to its terms in November 2002. The Director Plan expired for future grants according to its terms in April 2004. The 2006
Plan was approved by stockholders at our annual meeting January 17, 2007, and replaces our 1997 Plan as to future grants of options and RSUs.

We used the 1997 Plan to grant RSUs up to January 17, 2007 and are using the 2006 Plan subsequent to that date. The grants are not considered issued stock when granted and certificates are issued to the grantee only as vesting occurs.
We record unearned compensation based on the share price on the date of grant, and expense that compensation over the vesting period.

We
adopted a recent accounting pronouncement, FASB Statement 123(R), for employees and directors for our fiscal year beginning September 1, 2005. In compliance with the standard, we recorded stock-based compensation expense in the prior fiscal
year relating to stock options for employees and directors and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Options granted to consultants are accounted for under FASB Statement 123 and are valued using the Black-Scholes model. Compensation expense of those
options is recognized over the vesting life of the options, which is aligned with the consulting service life. Note 5 to our condensed consolidated financial statements sets forth the stock compensation expense recognized in the current quarter and
the comparable quarter of the prior year.



-33-



---

##### Table of Contents

(b) General Option Information

Summary of Option Activity

The following is a summary of stock option activity
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 and the six months ended February 28, 2007. Stock option grants during the current year are attributable to the conversion of options to purchase stock of Cirronet Inc. into options to purchase our
stock.



|           |  |                                       |  |                                |   |  |                     |   |  |                                  |     
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | - |  | ------------------- | - |  | -------------------------------- | ----
|           |  |                                       |  |                                |   |  | Options Outstanding
|           |  |                                       |  | SharesAvailable forOptions (#) |   |  | Number ofShares (#) |   |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice ($)
|Balance at |  | August 31, 2005                       |  | 177,680                        |   |  | 2,227,075           |   |  | $                                | 6.29
|           |  | Grants-stock options                  |  | (6,000                         | ) |  | 6,000               |   |  | $                                | 5.01
|           |  | Grants-restricted stock units         |  | (110,950                       | ) |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  | Exercises                             |  |                               |   |  | (89,254             | ) |  | $                                | 3.49
|           |  | Cancellations                         |  | 111,079                        |   |  | (111,079            | ) |  | $                                | 7.49
|           |  | Restricted stock (issues)/cancels-net |  | (108,050                       | ) |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  | Cancellations-restricted stock units  |  | 2,900                          |   |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  | Additional shares reserved            |  | 400,000                        |   |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  |                                       |  |                                |   |  |                     |   |  |                                  |     
|Balance at |  | August 31, 2006                       |  | 574,709                        |   |  | 2,032,742           |   |  | $                                | 6.34
|           |  | Grants-stock options                  |  | (1,089,468                     | ) |  | 1,089,468           |   |  | $                                | 1.31
|           |  | Grants-restricted stock units         |  | (84,250                        | ) |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  | Exercises                             |  |                               |   |  | (209,818            | ) |  | $                                | 1.55
|           |  | Cancellations-stock options           |  | 98,639                         |   |  | (98,639             | ) |  | $                                | 7.83
|           |  | Cancellations-restricted stock units  |  | 600                            |   |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  | Additional shares reserved            |  | 888,417                        |   |  |                    |   |  |                                  |    
|           |  |                                       |  |                                |   |  |                     |   |  |                                  |     
|Balance at |  | February 28, 2007                     |  | 388,647                        |   |  | 2,813,753           |   |  | $                                | 4.70

In-the-Money and Out-of-the-Money Stock Option Information

The following table compares the number of shares subject to stock option grants with exercise prices below the closing price of our common stock at
February 28, 2007 (referred to as In-the-Money) with the number of shares subject to stock option grants with exercise prices equal to or greater than the closing price of our common stock at February 28, 2007 (referred to as
Out-of-the-Money). The closing price of our common stock at February 28, 2007 was $4.159 per share.



|                          |  |             |  |                            |      |            |        |                            |   |            |  |                            |  |   |     
|------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | -------------------------- | ---- | ---------- | ------ | -------------------------- | - | ---------- |  | -------------------------- |  | - | ----
|                          |  | Exercisable |  | Unexercisable              |      | Total     
|As of End of Quarter      |  | Shares (#)  |  | Wtd. Avg.ExercisePrice ($) |      | Shares (#) |        | Wtd. Avg.ExercisePrice ($) |   | Shares (#) |  | Wtd. Avg.ExercisePrice ($)
|In-the-Money              |  | 1,513,155   |  | $                          | 2.07 |            | 4,375  |                            | $ | 3.15       |  | 1,517,530                  |  | $ | 2.08
|Out-of-the-Money          |  | 1,256,271   |  | $                          | 7.79 |            | 39,952 |                            | $ | 7.02       |  | 1,296,223                  |  | $ | 7.76
|                          |  |             |  |                            |      |            |        |                            |   |            |  |                            |  |   |     
|Total Options Outstanding |  | 2,769,426   |  | $                          | 4.66 |            | 44,327 |                            | $ | 6.64       |  | 2,813,753                  |  | $ | 4.70
|                          |  |             |  |                            |      |            |        |                            |   |            |  |                            |  |   |     



-34-



---

##### Table of Contents

Forward-looking Statements

Except for the historical information, this report contains numerous forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provision of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions involve risks and uncertainties. Statements containing terms such as believe, expect, plan,
estimate, anticipate, may or similar terms are considered to contain uncertainty and are forward-looking statements.We believe that these statements are based on reasonable assumptions and our
expectations at the time. Our actual results may differ materially from the statements and assumptions discussed in this report. However, these statements involve uncertainties and are completely qualified by reference to several important factors.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to; those discussed in the sections entitled Legal Proceedings, Selected Financial Data, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in this report, as well as the other factors detailed from time to time on our SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006.



|ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

We are exposed to market risk
primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates on our bank debt. As of February 28, 2007, with all other variables held constant, a hypothetical one-percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest expense of
approximately $73,000 on an annual basis.

A significant portion of our products have a manufacturing process in a foreign jurisdiction and
are sold in foreign jurisdictions. We manage our exposure to currency exchange fluctuations by denominating most transactions in U.S. dollars. We consider the amount of our foreign currency exchange rate risk to be immaterial as of February 28,
2007 and accordingly have not hedged any such risk.



|ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|------- | -----------------------

We carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
February 28, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

There are a number of risks
associated with RFM and its business, which are described in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended August 31, 2006. Material changes to these risk factors are outlined below. Any of these risks, as well as other risks and
uncertainties, could harm our business and financial results and cause the value of our securities to decline. The risks described in our Form 10-K or below are not the only ones facing RFM. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial also may impair our business.



-35-



---

##### Table of Contents

Recent Decline in Components Business

Our historical base business is declining, and could decline rapidly. Our guidance for the third and fourth fiscal quarters of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008
reflects a significant decline in order activity for our component products. We expect to require amendments to the covenants contained in our banking agreement as a result. Failure to obtain such amendments could result in a default under our
banking agreement and an immediate need for additional capital.

Liquidity

We believe that cash generated from operations, our cash balances, the amounts available under our existing banking agreement, and other available sources will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the rest
of fiscal 2007. As noted under Financial Conditions-Financing Arrangements, above, an amendment to our revolving line of credit agreement will revise our borrowing base calculation effective for our next quarter in a manner that will
reduce our availability by approximately $1.0 to $1.5 million. See also, the Risk Factor above entitled Recent Decline in Components Business. If for any reason our sources of funds are not sufficient to meet our requirements, we may be
required to raise additional funds. We cannot guarantee that we would be able to obtain additional financing or, if available, that it would be available to us on acceptable terms. Should that happen, there could be a significant adverse impact on
our operations.



|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

At the annual
meeting of stockholders of the Company held on January 17, 2007, the following actions were taken:



|1. | The stockholders elected the following individuals as directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and have qualified. The
action was taken as evidenced by the following vote totals.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |          
|---------------------- |  | ---------
|Director               |  | Votes    
|David M. Kirk:         |  |          
|For                    |  | 7,559,073
|Withheld               |  | 444,690  
|                       | 
|Michael R. Bernique    |  |          
|For                    |  | 7,634,387
|Withheld               |  | 369,376  
|                       | 
|Dean C. Campbell       |  |          
|For                    |  | 7,730,960
|Withheld               |  | 272,803  
|                       | 
|Francis J. Hughes, Jr. |  |          
|For                    |  | 7,730,960
|Withheld               |  | 272,803  
|                       | 
|William L. Eversole    |  |          
|For                    |  | 7,737,492
|Withheld               |  | 266,271  

These five individuals constitute the entire board of directors serving at this time.



-36-



---

##### Table of Contents

|2. | The stockholders approved our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and authorized for issuance thereunder the shares remaining under the 1997 Plan, including any shares returned as a result
of expirations or terminations of options, forfeitures of restricted stock unit awards or any other reason. The action was approved by the vote totals listed below. Broker non-votes did not affect the outcome and abstentions had the effect of
negative votes.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |          
|--------------- |  | ---------
|For             |  | 2,481,444
|Against         |  | 352,099  
|Abstain         |  | 53,297   
|Broker non-vote |  | 5,116,923



|3. | The stockholders ratified the selection of McGladrey & Pullen LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2007. The action was
approved by the following vote totals.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|        |  |          
|------- |  | ---------
|For     |  | 7,980,380
|Against |  | 4,300    
|Abstain |  | 19,083   



|ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS
|------- | --------



|(a) | Exhibits. We hereby incorporate by reference all exhibits filed in connection with Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Exhibits included:
|--- | ------------------



|        |  |                                                                                                                                                 
|------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  | Description                                                                                                                                     
|10.2    |  | First Amendment dated 2/28/07 to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated 9/1/06.
|        | 
|31.1    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.                                                                      
|        | 
|31.2    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.                                                                      
|        | 
|32.1    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.                                                                      
|        | 
|32.2    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.                                                                      



-37-



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                      |  |  |  |                      |  |                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | RF MONOLITHICS, INC.
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 16, 2007 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ David Kirk             
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | David Kirk                 
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | CEO, President and Director
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 16, 2007 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ Harley E Barnes III    
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | Harley E Barnes III        
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | CFO                        



-38-



---

##### Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS



|        |  |                                                                                                                                                    
|------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  | Description                                                                                                                                        
|10.2    |  | First Amendment dated 2/28/07 to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated 9/1/06.(1)
|        | 
|31.1    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.(1)                                                                      
|        | 
|31.2    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.(1)                                                                      
|        | 
|32.1    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.(1)                                                                      
|        | 
|32.2    |  | Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.(1)                                                                      



|(1) | Filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-Q.
|--- | --------------------------------------