alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Reinstated and Order filed November 10 , 20 1 1

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 1 0

- 00974

- CV

____________ SUTAPA GHOSH AND CENEMAWALLA, INC. , Appellant s

V.
PAWAN GROVER, M.D., 87 MINUTES PRODUCTION, L.L.C. AND PAV

ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 40721



### R E I N S T A T E M E N T O R D E R

Appellant petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 10

- 33891 . Because a stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, when this court receive d notice of appellant = s bankruptcy filing, on October 15 , 2010, we stayed all proceedings in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.2

On November 2, 2011 , appellee filed a motion to reinstate the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3(a). Attached to the motion is a true copy of the bankruptcy court ’ s order dismissing the bankruptcy case.
The motion is granted. Accordingly, the case is ordered REINSTATED and placed on the court ’ s active docket.

The record is due to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before December 12 , 20 1 1

.

PER CURIAM
# Sitemap

## October 2016

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2016
- October 2016

            - 03
            - 04
            - 05
            - 06
            - 07
            - 10
            - 11
            - 12
            - 13
            - 14
            - 15
            - 16
            - 17
            - 18
            - 19
            - 20
            - 21
            - 24
            - 25
            - 26
            - 27
            - 28
            - 30
            - 31
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 2 09

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BONNIE BURNETTE ERWIN , APPEL L ANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 7 T H

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SHERIFF J.B. SMITH

, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OP INION Appellant Bonnie Burnette Erwin was convicted of capital murder and assessed the death penalty (trial court cause number 7

- 84

- 174). This conviction was reversed and
the cause remanded for a new trial. See Erwin v. State , 729 S.W.2d 709, 717 (Tex. C rim. App. 1987)

. The case was dismissed in 1989 without being retried. Erwin is currently serving a sentence of life without parole plus 105 years after being convicted in federal district court (trial court cause number CR 3

- 48

- 168

- F) of several federal law violations including “Continuing Criminal Enterprise.” The kidnapping and murder that formed the basis for the capital murder conviction w ere considered in assessing punishment in the
federal case. Erwin contends that he was wrongfully convicted of capital murder and is entitled to compensation. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 103.001

– .154 ( Vernon 2005 & Supp. 2009). He filed a civil rights action to establish his alleged wrongful conviction. He also filed a motion requesting a court appo inted attorney and a second motion requesting a court appointed attorney to file a petition for compensation. The trial court denied each motion by a written order signed on June 14, 2010, and Erwin filed a notice of appeal.Unles s a statute specifically authorizes an interlocutory appeal, Texas appellate

courts have jurisdiction only over final judgments. Cherokee Water Co. v. Ross , 698 S.W.2d 363, 365 (Tex. 1985). No statute authorizes the appeal, prior to final judgment,
of th e orders denying Erwin’s motions for appointment of counsel. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. On July 1, 2010, this court notified Erwin, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.2, that the information received in th is appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Erwin was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before August 2, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this cou rt. In response to this court’s notice,
Erwin filed a document that we have construe d as an amended notice of appeal. However, this document does not establish the jurisdiction of this court. Because Erwin has not shown the jurisdiction of this court, th e appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.2, 42.3.

BRIAN HOYLE

__ Justice
Opinion delivered August 4 , 2010

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138769 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138769 

 COA: 288773 

Wayne CC: 07-010669-HF 

SAMUEL BRIAN POWELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 16

- 00528

- CV

IN RE VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION ; Valero Refining

- New Orleans, LLC; Valero Refining

- Texas, L.P.; Valero Services, Inc.; Valero Unit Investments, LLC; Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.; Valero International Holdings, Inc.; and Valero Refining and Marketing Co.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alv arez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 18 , 2016 , R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that R elator is not entitled to
the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011

- CI

- 04253, styled Judith Albarran
, et al

. v. Koch Specialty Plant Services, et al

. , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>


               THE MULTICARE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                             September 30, 1997

                                 (Unaudited)

                    (In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>

                                        Three months ended  Nine months ended
                                        September 30,       September 30,

                                        1996      1997      1996      1997
<S>                                  <C>          <C>       <C>       <C>

Income per common and
common equivalent share:
 Income before extraordinary item    $  7,418     9,810     20,395    28,751
 Net Income                          $  7,418     9,810     18,914    27,878

 Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                    27,606    32,823    27,506    32,172
 Income before extraordinary item
  per common and common equivalent
  share                              $    .27       .30       .74       .89

 Net income per common and common
  equivalent share                   $    .27       .30       .69       .87

Income per common and common
equivalent share assuming
full dilution:
 Income before extraordinary item    $    7,418     9,810     20,395    28,751

 Net income                               7,418     9,810     18,914    27,878
 Adjustments to income:
 Interest expense and amortization
  of debt issuance costs relating
  to convertible debt, net of tax         982       687       2,973     2,427
 Adjusted net income                 $    8,400     10,497    21,887    30,305

 Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent shares
  outstanding                             27,798    32,848    27,772    32,512
 Convertible debt shares                  4,976     4,168     4,976     4,320
 Adjusted shares                          32,774    37,016    32,748    36,832

Income before extraordinary item
per common share assuming full
dilution                             $    .26       .28       .71       .85

Net income per common share
assuming full dilution               $    .26       .28       .67       .82
</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROLAND ANDERSON.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Mike Turner selected as chief of Business Technical Division

VICKSBURG, Miss., November 4, 2013 – Mr. Michael A. Turner was recently selected as deputy director of the Regional Business Directorate and chief of the Business Technical Division for the  Mississippi Valley Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. His job duties include serving as the division expert in all matters relating to engineering and construction within the region as well as the responsibility for planning, supervising and providing technical leadership in the division's engineering and construction functions. 

A native of Belzoni, Miss., Mr. Turner began his Corps career as a design engineer in the Vicksburg District and has more than 30 years of experience in engineering, supervisory and leadership roles. His experience includes a broad array of civil works and water resources activities at both the district and regional level.  Mr. Turner’s most recent assignment was chief of the Technical Support Branch in the Vicksburg District, where he was instrumental in the development and execution of the division’s regional architect engineer contracting initiative and served as a member of the Regional Acquisition Strategy Board.

Mr. Turner received his bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Mississippi State University. He is a registered professional engineer and a certified level 2 facilities engineer. He is also a member of the Society of American Military Engineers (SAME), where he plays an important leadership role serving as camp director of the SAME/Army Engineering and Construction Camp conducted each summer to expose high school students from around the country to the engineering profession.

Mike is married to the former Renee Noe from Clarksdale, Miss., and they have three children.

The Mississippi Valley Division is responsible for water resources engineering solutions in a 370,000-square-mile area, extending from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico and encompassing portions of 12 states.  Work is carried out by district offices located in St. Paul, Minn.; Rock Island, Ill.; St. Louis, Mo.; Memphis, Tenn.; Vicksburg, Miss.; and New Orleans, La.

**Contact**

Release no. 13-020
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000577 29-JAN-2015 10:00 AM
# Sitemap

## April 12, 2001

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2001
- 04
- April 12, 2001

            - X-40A Second Free-flight
            - X-40A on Runway After Second Free-flight
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 10-QSB
of DrugMax.com, Inc. for the 6 months ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,475,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,872,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                   472,870
<INVENTORY>                                  9,262,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,000,928
<PP&E>                                         852,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,857,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,417,815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,419
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,038,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,857,181
<SALES>                                     67,862,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,862,991
<CGS>                                       65,495,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,495,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,043,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             471,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,147,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,147,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,147,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

128981 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128981 

 COA: 262089 

Emmet CC: 04-002203-FH 

KEVIN LEE STRAHAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### In re Estate of McConney: McConney et al., Appellants, *v.*Young, Exrx., Appellee.

(No. 471 —

Decided April 27, 1942.)

*287*Messrs. Young & Young,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Strclits, Dotuler & Wiedemann,*for appellee.

Carpenter, J.

This appeal on questions of law is taken from an order overruling exceptions to items in the inventory of the estate of Mary E. McConney. The exceptions were filed by two next of kin of the decedent whose interest in the estate depends upon their success in a pending contest of her will by which, if it stands, they will receive nothing. Being next of kin, having this contingent interest, they were “persons interested” within the meaning of Section 10509-59, General Code, and thereby had the right to file the exceptions. If and when the will contest is successful, it will be too late for these exceptors to object to the form of the inventory.

The exceptions urged were that certain articles or items were, as might be said, “bunched,” and were not inventoried separately as required by statute. To illustrate some of them:

Electrical heater, bathrom scales and linen towels ................................$10.00

Kitchen utensils .......................... 4.00

Silverware ................................ 12.50

Chinaware ............... 4.00

Chaise lounge, pillows, telephone stand, round table, small radio, book stand........... 4.00

The form of such inventory is provided for in Section 10509-47, General Code, the material part of which is as follows:

“Each article or item must be set down separately, with its value in dollars and cents, distinctly in figures, opposite to the article or items, respectively.”

*288This language is explicit and this court can find no escape from it, when compliance with the statute is 'insisted upon by any person interested in the estate. Neither the appraisers nor the Probate Court are given any discretion to depart from the precise direction it gives. If groupings of articles as here made can be approved, where is the limit? And who is to say what it is? That detailed enumeration of trivial items as “kitchen utensils” may be cumbersome, useless, and unnecessary is an argument that should be addressed to the Legislature. The courts can not change the clear language used in this statute-. The items excepted to do not conform to the quoted provision, and the order overruling the exceptions to them is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Probate Court for further proceedings.

*Order reversed and cause remanded.*

Overmyer and Lloyd, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00177-CR

Donald Ray Sparks, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1268922R)

July 31, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
# National Great Rivers Museum Temporarily Closed

**E. Alton, IL -- **
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be closing the National Great Rivers Museum beginning close of business November 20th, 2020 until further notice as a result of the recent surge in COVID-19 cases and the subsequent mitigations issued by the state of Illinois. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers remains proactive with regards to the safety and health of all visitors and will provide additional information regarding this closure and any other modifications or restrictions of our Project Areas as it becomes available.

The National Great Rivers Museum is located off of River Heritage Parkway (IL Hwy 143) at #2 Lock & Dam Way, E. Alton, IL 62024, adjacent to Melvin Price Locks & Dam.  For more information, visit www.mtrf.org, or find us on Facebook at: www.facebook.com/GreatRivers.

**Contact**

Release no. 20-198

NGRM

National Great Rivers Museum

COVID-19

closed
July 20, 1966

Honorable CharlesA. Allen CriminalDistrictAttornev Harrison County P. 0. Box 949 Marshall, Texas

Dear Mr. Allen: Re: Whether H.B. 442, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, R.S., Chapter 576, p. 1255, applies to buck deer inHarrison County insofaras the open season is concernedor whether H.B. 819, Acts of the 57th Legislature, 1961, R.S., Chapter 510, p. 1122, applies to buck ueer as to open season. You have requested the opinion of this office as to whether the open season is determinedby-H.B. 442, on buck deer in Harrison County Acts of the 59th Legislature, OpinionNo. C-727

R.S., Chapter 576, Page 1255, or by H.B. 819,Acts 57th Legislature, 1961, R.S., Chapter 510, Page 1122.

House Bill No. 819,Acts 57th Legislature,provides by Section 1 thereof that it shallbe unlawful for anyperson to hunt, take or kill any game animal in Harrison County at any time except as provided for in the act. Section 1 furtherprovides for the Game and Fish Commission (now Parks and Wildlife Department) topromulgate rulesand regulationswhich might set forth an open season for the hunting, taking or killing of game animals in Harrison County. House Bill No. 442, Acts 59th Legislature,reads inpart as follows:

II

. . . and 1t shallbe lawful to take or kill buck deer inHarrison County during theperiod fromNovember 15th to November 30th,both days inclusive.
. . .'I House Bill No. 442 is concise and explicitas to an open season on buck deer inHarrison County. It is the -3497-Honorable CharlesA. Allen, Page 2 (C-727)

latest expressionof the Legislatureon this topic and therefore controls over H.B. 819. Baker v. Compton, 52 Tex. 252 (1879); Adams v. RockwallCounty, 280 S W (Tex.Comm.App.I$?-, 118 Tkx: x23, 16 S.W.2d 1063 (192 j. SUMMARY

HouseBill No. 442, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, R.S., Chapter 576, Page 1255, controls the open season on buck deer inHarrison County. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas

By: Q??f&@A

MILTON RICHARDSON ssistantAttorney General JMR/br APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Lonny F. Zwiener Dunklin Sullivan Thomas Mack Malcolm Quick APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: T, B. Wright

-349s
# Sitemap

## October 26, 2022

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2022
- 10
- October 26, 2022

            - Winners Named in NASA Runway Reconfiguration Challenge
            - Recycling Air Beyond our Earth Junior Challenge
            - NASA Particle Partition Challenge
            - Astronaut Frank Rubio is pictured inside the cupola
            - Cosmonaut Anna Kikina wears headphones for a hearing assessment
            - Astronaut Josh Cassada stows blood samples inside a science freezer
            - Astronaut Koichi Wakata gives a “thumbs up” sign
            - Cosmonaut Sergey Prokopyev works inside the Zvezda service module
            - Cosmonaut Anna Kikina works on electronics gear
            - Astronaut Josh Cassada works inside the Columbus laboratory module
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Peter F. Collins, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritone, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 29, 2020 |   |   | /s/ Peter F. Collins                            |
|----------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Peter F. Collins                                     |
|                 |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                 |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES S. GOTELL.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.