alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dear Chairman Grundmann:

The Merit Systems Protection Board is without authority to implement via its regulatory 

power summary judgment proceedings (i.e. Option C). See Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs, S. Rep. 112-155 at 28 (Apr. 19, 2012) ("Currently, the 

Board does not have the authority to grant summary judgment in a whistleblower 

case."). Further, Congress considered--but declined--to give the Board summary 

judgment authority, and it even tasked the Comptroller General to recommend 

"whether Congress should grant the Merit Systems Protection Board summary 

judgment authority" for cases alleging violations of 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) or (9). See 

Section 116 of Pub. L. 112-199 and Section 118 of S. 743RS (2012). 

As noted by the Congressional Research Service, "[w]hile courts are naturally reluctant 

to attribute significance to the failure of Congress to act, that reluctance may be 

overcome if it can be shown that Congress considered and rejected bill language that 

would have adopted the very position being urged upon the court." See Statutory 

Interpretation: General Principles and Recent Trends, Congressional Research Service, 

Order Code 97-859, p. CRS-42 (Aug. 31, 2008) (citing Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 622 

(2004) (“drafting history show[s] that Congress cut the very language in the bill that 

would have authorized any presumed damages”)) (available at 

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/97-589.pdf) (last visited Dec. 6, 2013). Here, Congress 

considered--but rejected--the very position being offered as a regulatory option.

Finally, the basis offered in support for Option C--that it is entitled to Chevron deference 

because "relevant statutes and regulations that provide for Board jurisdiction are silent 

or ambiguous with respect to the identity of jurisdictional elements and the applicable 

burden of proof," and because "Congress and OPM did not unambiguously and with 

precision identify jurisdictional elements or specify applicable burdens of proof for 

establishing jurisdiction"--is erroneous. Under Chevron v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837, the 

question is "whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue," and 

if Congress' intent is clear, "that is the end of the matter." Here, the precise question is 

the Board's authority to grant a motion for summary judgment. This is far more specific 

than "identity of jurisdictional elements and the applicable burden of proof." And 

Congress' intent vis-à-vis authority to grant motions for summary judgment is indeed 

clear: the Board does not have it, and it therefore may not grant itself this power via 

regulation.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely,

David Pardo, Publisher

MSPB Watch
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

April 14, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Philip S. Chan     
|Philip S. Chan         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely
pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for any other purpose.
# Sitemap

## November 02, 2017

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2017
- 11
- November 02, 2017

            - Veteran Space Shuttle and Management Astronauts Currie-Gregg and Smith Retire from NASA
            - NASA, Houston Cinema Arts Society Count Down to ‘CineSpace Day’ at Houston Cinema Arts Festival
            - NASA’s New “Gravity Assist” Podcast Debuts Nov. 15, 2017
            - Mark Marley: Hubble’s Greatest Exoplanet Mysteries
            - Mark Marley: Hubble’s Greatest Exoplanet Mysteries
            - Mark Marley: Hubble’s Greatest Exoplanet Mysteries
            - Mark Marley: Hubble’s Greatest Exoplanet Mysteries
            - Mark Marley: Hubble’s Greatest Exoplanet Mysteries
            - NASA Selects New Technologies to Flight Test on Parabolic Aircraft, Balloons and Suborbital Rockets
            - Bushfires in Northern Territory of Australia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MAR-31-1999 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,726
<SECURITIES>                                     1,307
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,092
<PP&E>                                          31,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,080
<BONDS>                                            626
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,955
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,553)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (74)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    706
<INCOME-TAX>                                        24
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
No. 13,927.

#### Lindley *v.*Kregelo.

*Jurisdiction.*— Statute.—Construction.—Under section 312, E. S. 1881, when there are several defendants, and the court obtains jurisdiction over one of them, it has jurisdiction over all others residing within the State by issuing and serving process on them.

From the Marion Superior Court.

*J. C. Brush,*for appellant.

*A. W. Wishard,*for appellee.

Olds, J.

— This is a suit on account by the appellee against the appellant, John H. Lindley, and one Melville E. Heiner. The suit was commenced in the Marion Superior Court, and service had upon the defendant Heiner in Marion county, Heiner being at the time a resident of the city of Chicago, Illinois, and a summons was issued and sent to Parke county, and the appellant Lindley served the day following the service on Heiner.

The defendant Lindley answered, alleging that neither he *177nor his co-defendant resided in Marion county, Indiana, nor did either reside there at the commencement of this *action;*that he is a *bona fide*resident of Parke county, Indiana, and that neither of said defendants is subject to the jurisdiction of the Marion Superior Court, which answer is verified by said Lindley.

Filed Nov. 26, 1889.

The plaintiff replied to the answer of Lindley by general denial. Trial was had, and a finding and judgment for the plaintiff against both of the defendants.

Lindley filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and error assigned as to the ruling on the motion for a new trial.

The question presented and discussed is as to the jurisdiction of the court as to the defendant Lindley.

The suit is upon a joint cause of action. The defendant Heiner being a non-resident of the State at the time of the commencement of the suit, and he being found and served with process in Marion county, Indiana, the court had jurisdiction as to him, and having jurisdiction of the cause of action, and of one of the defendants, by the issuing and service of process on the other defendant Lindley in Parke county, it had jurisdiction to try and determine the controversy as to all of the parties. The construction we place upon section 312, R. S. 1881, is that when there are several defendants, and the court obtains jurisdiction over one of them, it has jurisdiction over all others residing within the State by issuing and serving process on them.

There is no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.                    

*Date:*                         November 9, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6889,                         *ravindrn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 6, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26029 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCA 942000 L57000000 BX0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey of lands described below are scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management California State Office, Sacramento, California, on the next business day following the plat acceptance date.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at the California State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, upon required payment.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief, Branch of Geographic Services, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-1623, Sacramento, California 95825, (916) 978-4310.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

These surveys were executed to meet the administrative needs of various agencies; the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service or the Army Corps of Engineers. A person or party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above address) with the California State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Sacramento, California. The lands surveyed are:

## Mount Diablo Meridian, California

T. 9 S., R. 2 W., accepted July 12, 2010.

T. 9 N., R. 17 E., accepted July 14, 2010.

T. 26 N., R. 15 E., accepted August 4, 2010.

T. 22 S., R. 9 E., accepted August 4, 2010.

T. 40-41 N., R. 7 E., accepted September 23, 2010.

T. 18 N., R. 8 E., accepted September 27, 2010.

## San Bernardino Meridian, California

T. 9 S., R. 2 W., accepted July 12, 2010.

T. 15 S., R. 6 E., accepted July 27, 2010.

T. 9 N., R. 20 W., accepted August 05, 2010.

T. 1 S., R. 3-4 E., accepted August 16, 2010.

Authority:  43 U.S.C., Chapter 3.

Dated: October 4, 2010.

Lance J. Bishop,

Chief, Branch of Geographic Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-26063 Filed 10-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
March 13 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF E .L.M. , A child

NO. 14

- 13

- 00970

- CV

________________________________ T oday the Court heard appellant’ s motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on July 25, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reas on of this appeal be paid by appellant, Manuel Morell

. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 4.433

 

THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

 

(THE BANK OF RUSSIA)

 

LICENSE

 

OF A PROFESSIONAL PARTICIPANT OF THE SECURITIES MARKET

 

No. 177-04635-010000 dated 24 January 2001

 

for carrying out dealer activity

 

This License is granted to MTS Bank Public Joint-Stock Company (MTS Bank PJSC)

 

Location: Moscow

 

OGRN: 1027739053704

 

TIN: 7702045051

 

Validity: unlimited

 

Authorities issued the license: Federal Commission for the Securities Market of Russia

 

 

	
Deputy Chairman of the Bank of   Russia
    	
/signature/ V.V. Chistyukhin
    


 

[Round seal of the Bank of Russia]
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, C.E. Rick Strattan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/C.E. Rick Strattan
C.E. Rick Strattan
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas Tekiele, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 of Unique Fabricating, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: October 7, 2019By:/s/ Thomas TekieleName: Thomas TekieleTitle:  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 4.372

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169311 dated June 27, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

local telephone communication services, excluding local telephone communication services using coin-box telephones and public access services

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

Research and production association «Progressivniye Technologii»

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1025001631137

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

5013008091

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

7A, Amet-Khan Sultana str.,Zhukovsky, Moscow region, 140180

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 27, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 18, 2018 No. 735-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.A.Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WARREN STANLEY.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11583

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

TERRY SHERO, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:16-CR-124-1 

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Terry Shero has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Shero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 27, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11583 Document: 00514091095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2017
No. 16-11583

2 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-11583 Document: 00514091095 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2017
<PAGE>

BANKATLANTIC BANCORP, INC.
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
A. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



BY /S/ JAMES A. WHITE
  ----------------------------
NAME: JAMES A. WHITE
TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
DATE:  AUGUST 14, 2003

The foregoing certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the
Company's future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in
part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such
filings. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.