alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997             AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             137                     137
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      584                     584
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16                      16
<INVENTORY>                                      1,101                   1,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,224                   2,224
<PP&E>                                           1,658                   1,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                     768                     768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,815                   3,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,092                   4,092
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        25,857                  25,857
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,134)                (26,134)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,815                   3,815
<SALES>                                          1,011                   2,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,011                   2,602
<CGS>                                              765                   1,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,375                   3,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76                     195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (440)                 (1,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (440)                 (1,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (440)                 (1,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)                  (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40360

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-91-CR-247-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Reyes appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess

with the intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the

Government breached the plea agreement by making a less-thanenthusiastic recommendation that the court depart downward

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, p.s. Under the plea agreement, the

Government retained full discretion over the decision whether to

file a motion for downward departure, United States v. Price, 95

F.3d 364 (5th Cir. 1996), and Reyes has not shown that the

Government’s alleged lackluster § 5K1.1 recommendation was based 
No. 97-40360

-2-

on an unconstitutional motive. See Wade v. United States, 504

U.S. 181 (1992). Nor is the Government required to argue

enthusiastically for a particular sentencing recommendation. 

Benchimol v. United States, 471 U.S. 453, 455-57 (1985). Reyes

cannot prevail on his claim for breach. The sentence of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
1 min read

# AETC Hypersonic Facilities

### Lillian Gipson

#### Web Editor

Jan 06, 2016

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Aerothermodynamics Laboratory**The Aerothermodynamics Laboratory at LaRC is a collection of three small, economical hypersonic tunnels used for basic fundamental flow physics research, aerodynamic performance measurements, and aero heating assessment. Many of the studies are aimed at screening, assessing, optimizing and benchmarking (when combined with computational fluid dynamics) advanced aerospace vehicle concepts. Collectively, these tunnels have contributed to many major hypersonic vehicle programs from the Apollo Space Program to the recent X-43A scramjet that flew at Mach 7 in March 2004 and Mach 9.6 in November 2004. These facilities also provide vital support to the development of NASA’s CEV.

Read More

**8-Foot High-Temperature Tunnel**This combustion-heated, blow-down-to-atmosphere tunnel at LaRC duplicates flight enthalpies at hypersonic conditions Mach 4 to 7 and accommodates large air-breathing propulsion systems and Thermal Protection System components. Tests of note include a Pratt & Whitney and U.S. Air Force test on the Ground Demonstrator Engine No. 2 (GDE-2) to better understand how test conditions influence the internal/external profile shapes of the engine and to document in detail any changes to its form. This landmark test also successfully demonstrated for the first time the use of a closed-loop hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet propulsion system at hypersonic conditions.

Read More

AETC

AETC Ground Facilities

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es

@NASA

## Discover More Topics From NASA

Missions

Humans In Space
Solar System Exploration
Solar System Overview The solar system has one star, eight planets, five dwarf planets, at least 290 moons, more than…

Explore NASA’s History

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

jim.banke@nasa.gov

## Related Terms

                - Aerosciences Evaluation Test Capabilities
EXHIBIT 32


Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T , does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofCarey Credit Income Fund 2016 T.

Date:March 16, 2016/s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMARK J. DECESARISChief Executive OfficerDate:March 16, 2016/s/ Paul S. Saint-PierrePAUL S. SAINT-PIERREChief Financial Officer


The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T or the certifying officers.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T and will be retained by Carey Credit Income Fund 2016 T and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.414

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 177989 dated September 13, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 13, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 31, 2019 No. 644-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
#### TBF, INC., ETC. v. JOHN KAPUSTA.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 19, 2019

t0612 

# Order

Clerk June 19, 2019

159166

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159166

COA: 346371

Cass CC: 17

- 010189

- FH

JAVIER ESCOBEDO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2 018

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the January 17, 2018 amended judgment of

sentence, and we REMAND this case to the Cass Circuit Court to reinstate the December

15, 2017 judgment of sentence. People v Comer , 500 Mich 278 (2017). We further

VACATE that part of the December 15, 2017 judgment of sentence imposing a $500

fine. MCL 769.1k(1)(b)( i ). MCL 750.520b does not authorize a fine. In all other

respects, lea ve to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1016 

Concurring in the judgement of the assessment provided by the United States 

intelligence community regarding Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2018 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence 

RESOLUTION 

Concurring in the judgement of the assessment provided 

by the United States intelligence community regarding 

Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. 

Whereas the United States intelligence community released 

an assessment on January 6, 2017, titled ‘‘Assessing 

Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections’’ (ICA 2017–01D); 

Whereas the institutions that make up the intelligence community are an important foundation to American democracy; and 

Whereas the intelligence community is comprised of patriotic 

professionals who provide timely and relevant nonVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:03 Jul 24, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1016.IH HR1016

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1016 IH 

partisan analysis and assessments that are critical to 

American defense and interests: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives concurs 

2 in the judgement of the assessment provided by the United 

3 States intelligence community on January 6, 2017, titled 

4 ‘‘Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent 

5 US Elections’’ (ICA 2017–01D). 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### ALFRED BRENNER, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Argued October 20, 1944

Decided February 2, 1945.

For the appellant, *Alfred Brenner, pro se.*

For the respondents, *William Rulin.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Colib, Wells, Bafferty, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 9.

*For reversal*— Perskie, J. 1.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epicor Software Corporation (the “Company ”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, L. George Klaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/*L. George Klaus* |  
 
**L. George Klaus Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2002**

 
  |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

I, PeterF. Collins, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Veritone, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 29, 2019   
*/s/ Peter F. Collins*
   Peter F. Collins   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)***
| | usbank
    (logo)                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                          
| | Global
                                 Corporate Trust

60
Livingston Avenue
EP-MN-WS3D
Saint
Paul, MN 55107

usbank.com



Annual
Statement of Compliance

Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18



VIA:
EMAIL



Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585
Broadway

New
York, New York 10036

Attention:
Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



| | Re: | Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between
                                         Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
                                         as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge
                                         Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee,
                                         Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Thomas C. Campbell, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, as a certifying servicer hereby
certify that:



(1) 
A review of the activities of the Custodian during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the
performance of the Custodian under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)   
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Custodian has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 10, 2023





|U.S.
Bank National Association, as Custodian
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|By:                                         
|                                            
|
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26557]



[[Page 65018]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of 
employees from the Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa, as an addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational 
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On October 6, 2010, the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 
agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked in any 
area of the Department of Energy facility at the Ames Laboratory 
from January 1, 1955 through December 31, 1960, for a number of work 
days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 
under this employment, or in combination with work days within the 
parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 
the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation will become effective November 5, 2010, unless 
Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this 
effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can 
also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d0d7d5c7d4d7d0d7bad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4307000210030007006d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-26557 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Sitemap

## October 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- October 2023

            - 01
            - 02
            - 03
            - 04
            - 05
            - 06
            - 07
            - 09
            - 10
            - 11
            - 12
            - 13
            - 14
            - 15
            - 16
            - 17
            - 18
            - 19
            - 20
            - 21
            - 23
            - 24
            - 25
            - 26
            - 27
            - 28
            - 30
            - 31
# Sitemap

## May 09, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 05
- May 09, 2011

            - Comets WISE – A Family Portrait
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Deborah Jean Braniff v. Richard James Braniff

Appellate case number: 01-11-00174-CV; 01-11-00175-CV

Trial court case number: 2002-51181, 2010-70029

Trial court: 308th District Court of Harris County

These cases involve appeals from a judgment signed on March 8, 2011 Appellant timely

filed her no.tice of appeal on March 2, 2011 See TEX. R. App. P 26.1, 27.1(a). The record was

 ̄ due on May 9, 2011 See TEX. R. Ape. P. 4.1 (a), 35.1 The clerk’s record has been filed in both

cause numbers. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On July 13, 2012, the Clerk notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for

preparing the record in this appeal had informed the Court that appellant had not made

arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. The Clerk further notified appellant that unless

she provided proof of payment for preparation of the reporter’s record, proof of having made

payment arrangements for the reporter’s record, or a response showing that she was exempt from

paying for the reporter’s record by July 23, 2012, the Court might consider and decide only those

issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record. See TEx. R. Al,l,. P 37.3(c).

Appellant has not provided the Court with evidence showing that she has paid or made

arrangements to pay the court reporter. Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those

issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See

TEX. R. APl,. P 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the

filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. Al,l, P 38.6(b).

Judge’s signature:/s/Jim Sharp, Jr.

[El Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: August 6, 2012