alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sitemap

## June 01, 2015

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2015
- 06
- June 01, 2015

            - NASA Awards Wallops Island Fire Station Construction Project
            - Visualization of CYGNSS Deployed
            - Canadian Wildfires Continue and Increase
            - NASA Tests Aircraft Wing Coatings that Slough Bug Guts
            - Gemini IV Astronauts at the Launch Pad
            - Gemini IV: Learning to Walk in Space
            - Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator Prepared For Second Flight Test
            - Dione Dwarfing Rhea
            - Gemini IV: Learning to Walk in Space
            - In Tribute
|US
    Bank(logo) | All
    of us serving you
|----------------- | -------------------------







Annual Statement of Compliance

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Trust 2014-C18



VIA: EMAIL



Morgan Stanley Capital I
Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



Re:	      Pooling
and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as the Special
Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee, Certificate
Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President
of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 7, 2017



|U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|                                                            
|
#  MVD Welcomes New Security Officer

He served in the U.S. military for 14 years, first as a Marine infantryman and then an Army infantry officer. Kisner is one of the Army's top subject matter experts in medical fraud investigations and has many years of service in the security, antiterrorism and force protection arenas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DEOTEXIS
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         959,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,237,584
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,048,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,263
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,547
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,064,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,048,510
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,497
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               272,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (277,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (277,829)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL MANN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3688

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

 )

Opinion filed August 21, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Brian Iten, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan Tanoos, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

 

KHOUZAM, C.J., and KELLY and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
## NO. 12

- 17

- 00016

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF J.W .,

A JUVENILE, §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 279T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

JEFFERSON COUNTY, TE XAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

T his appea l is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. P ursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’ s docketing statement
was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., December 20, 2 016

. On
January 4, 2017 , this C ourt requested that Appellant file a docketin g statement within ten days if
he had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested

. On January 19, this C ourt issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing
statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was

filed on or before January 30 , the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed,
and Appellant has not complied with the Court’ s request.
Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is

dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).
Opinion delivered February 8, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 8 , 2017

NO. 12

- 17

- 00016

- CV

IN THE MA TTER OF J.W., A JUVE NILE

Appeal from the 279th District Court
of Jefferson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F

- 12432

- J)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed ; and that the decision be certified to the court

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Exhibit 31.1
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
          reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
          reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
          respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
          servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
          statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
          agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance
          with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
          Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
          report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

July 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan       
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.
|us bank(logo) | All of us serving you
|------------- | ---------------------





Annual Statement of Compliance

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Trust 2014-C18



VIA: EMAIL



Morgan Stanley Capital I
Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



| | Re: | Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between
Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee,
Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify
that:



(1) A review of the activities of the Certificate
Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance of the Certificate
Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 1, 2018



U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator





|By: | /s/ Kimberly
    O. Jacobs | 
|--- | -------------------------- | 
|    | Kimberly O. Jacobs         | 
|    | Senior Vice President      |
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANGEL LUIS PEREZ.

January 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
July 20, 1966 

Honorable Charles A. Allen 

Criminal District Attornev 

Harrison County 

P. 0. Box 949 

Marshall, Texas 

Dear Mr. Allen: 

Re: Whether H.B. 442, Acts 

59th Legislature, 1965, 

R.S., Chapter 576, p. 

1255, applies to buck 

deer in Harrison County 

insofar as the open season is concerned or 

whether H.B. 819, Acts 

of the 57th Legislature, 

1961, R.S., Chapter 510, 

p. 1122, applies to buck 

ueer as to open season. 

You have requested the opinion of this office as 

to whether the open season 

is determined by-H.B. 442, 

on buck deer in Harrison County 

Acts of the 59th Legislature, 

Opinion No. C-727 

R.S., Chapter 576, Page 1255, or by H.B. 819, Acts 57th 

Legislature, 1961, R.S., Chapter 510, Page 1122. 

House Bill No. 819, Acts 57th Legislature, provides 

by Section 1 thereof that it shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take or kill any game animal in Harrison County at any time except as provided for in the act. Section 

1 further provides for the Game and Fish Commission (now 

Parks and Wildlife Department) to promulgate rules and 

regulations which might set forth an open season for the 

hunting, taking or killing of game animals in Harrison 

County. 

House Bill No. 442, Acts 59th Legislature, reads 

in part as follows: 

II . . . and 1t shall be lawful to take 

or kill buck deer in Harrison County during the period from November 15th to 

November 30th, both days inclusive. . . .'I 

House Bill No. 442 is concise and explicit as to 

an open season on buck deer in Harrison County. It is the 

-3497- 
Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 2 (C-727) 

latest expression of the Legislature on this topic and 

therefore controls over H.B. 819. Baker v. Compton, 52 

Tex. 252 (1879); Adams v. Rockwall County, 280 S W 

(Tex.Comm.App. I$?-, 118 Tkx: x23, 

16 S.W.2d 1063 (192 j. 

SUMMARY 

House Bill No. 442, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, R.S., Chapter 576, Page 

1255, controls the open season on buck 

deer in Harrison County. 

Yours very truly, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

By: Q??f&@A 

MILTON RICHARDSON 

ssistant Attorney General 

JMR/br 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Lonny F. Zwiener 

Dunklin Sullivan 

Thomas Mack 

Malcolm Quick 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: T, B. Wright 

-349s
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY C. MCNEAL.

February 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN BETHEA.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
(logo) Grant Thornton

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

|  

 

 

  | **Audit • Tax  •Advisory**

**Grant Thornton LLP**

1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200

Kansas City, Missouri 64106

T 816.412.2400

F 816.412.2404 |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included inthe accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable ServicingCriteria (“Management’s Assertion”), that Situs Holdings, LLC(the “Company”) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S.  Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Operating or Trust Advisor ServicesPlatform (the “Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.The platform consists of asset-backed transactions and securities defined bymanagement in Appendix B of Management’s report. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about theCompany’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platformand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backedtransactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whetherthe Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions andsecurities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the periodcovered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have includedservicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or securityconstituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detectmaterial noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered bythis report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activitiesduring the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that SitusHoldings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria asof and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform is fairly stated,in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Kansas City, Missouri 

February 28, 2017
Exhibit 4.364

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 154795 dated September 02, 2017

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 02, 2022.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 16, 2017 No. 259-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
No. 87-6533.

#### Drew *v.*Carroll et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Preston, Appellant.

(No. 3973

Decided June 7, 1943.)

*319
      *Mr. Joel S. Rhinefort,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mrs. Geraldine Macehvane,*for appellee. .

*Mr. Frank J. McManus,*for appellant.

Lloyd, J.

The defendant Preston is the father of two minor children, the custody of whom was awarded by the Court of Common Pleas of Wood county to Mrs. Preston in an action wherein a divorce was granted k> her. Thereafter they became residents of Lucas county where, on November 7, 1935, an indictment was returned against Preston for nonsupport of the children. It seems that nothing was done on the indictment until April 5, 1937, when Preston, waiving the reading of the indictment, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to twelve months in the workhouse. The sentence was suspended on condition that he comply with the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Wood county as to the support of the children, and has not been invoked, and Preston has not served any part thereof. On May 5, 1940, Preston was again hailed into court and released on the giving of a maintenance bond. This bond, dated May 6, 1940, was filed in the cause. It was executed by Preston and J. P. Hauser. It is in the sum of $500 and was given to secure the payment to the Toledo Humane Society of $6 per week for the support of the minor children.

Mrs. Preston died on December 12, 1941, and thereafter the children resided with the maternal grandparents, to whom on December 23, 1942, the custody of the children was given by the Juvenile Court of Lucas county.

The action resulting in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, was brought on the bond. A jury ■was waived and the cause tried by the court. The find*320ing and judgment were in favor of the state in the sum of $371.18. Preston appeals. Hauser does not.

Preston claims that the judgment is erroneous because the bond was for the securing of the support of the children while in the custody of the mother and was not to secure payment to the grandparents of any part of the sum awarded by the court for the support of the children. This contention is not tenable. The weekly payments were to be made to the Toledo Humane Society for the support of the children, and there is no claim that any of them was diverted to any use other than its intended purpose.

The other claim made is that the sentence imposed on Preston having been suspended and the term of the sentence having expired, the bond has become unenforceable. A court has no power to suspend this sentence. The order of suspension is void and does not prevent the court from carrying the sentence into execution. Sh*ondell*v. *Bradley, Supt. of Toledo Workhouse,*42 Ohio App., 8, 181 N. E., 559. The bond, therefore, is in force and effect for the purposes for which given.

No error appearing in the record prejudicial to Preston, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Carpenter and Stuart, JJ., concur.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARMEN LORRAINE DANIELS.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.