65046 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices 

16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

period on the Capital Market, unless it 

does not appear to Nasdaq staff that it 

is possible for the Company to cure the 

deficiency. 

The Commission believes that 

requiring a company to affirmatively 

state its intent to cure the bid price 

deficiency and Nasdaq staff to 

determine whether it is possible for the 

company to cure that deficiency, 

provides further protections to 

investors, by helping to ensure that only 

companies that are serious and capable 

of gaining compliance with the Capital 

Market listing standards within the 

timeframe provided qualify for the 

second compliance period. In this 

regard, the Commission would expect a 

thorough review to ensure that it is 

possible for the bid price deficiency to 

be cured at the end of the second 180 

day compliance period and, if not, 

would expect Nasdaq to immediately 

commence delisting proceedings. 

In approving the Nasdaq’s proposal, 

the Commission recognizes that certain 

companies that do not currently qualify 

for the second compliance period could 

receive additional time to remain listed 

on a public market. The proposal, 

however, does not extend the overall 

maximum time of 360 days that a 

company may remain listed before 

delisting proceedings will commence. 

Moreover, the proposal eliminates the 

automatic nature of the second 180 day 

bid price compliance period that exists 

under the current rules. Further, 

notwithstanding the change in 

eligibility criteria for a second 

compliance period, the Commission 

expects Nasdaq to monitor companies 

closely that are out of compliance and 

use its authority to delist issuers in a 

prompt, efficient, and fair manner 

where necessary and appropriate, in 

accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5100, 

including where there are public 

interest or other concerns such as low 

price or market value, that make 

continued listing unwarranted. 

Finally, the Commission finds that 

Nasdaq’s proposal to remove language 

in Rule 5810(c)(3) will reduce confusion 

regarding the application of the rule by 

clarifying that there are no fees 

applicable to a company which transfer 

to the Capital Market. The additional 

changes proposed by Nasdaq to the text 

of Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i)–(ii) conform the 

rule language and format of the two 

paragraphs and clarify that Nasdaq will 

assess a company for compliance with 

applicable listing requirements based on 

the company’s most recent public filings 

and market information. The 

Commission believes that these changes 

either clarify the rule or are nonsubstantive. 

IV. Conclusion 

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that the 

proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ– 

2010–107), be, and hereby is, approved. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.17

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26474 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

In the Matter of Cape Systems Group, 

Inc., Caribbean Cigar Company, Casual 

Male Corp., Cell Power Technologies, 

Inc., Cellmetrix, Inc. (f/k/a BCAM 

International, Inc.), Cellular Products, 

Inc. (n/k/a 872 Main Street Corp.), 

Ceptor Corp., CGS Scientific Corp., 

and Ciprico, Inc., File No. 500–1; Order 

of Suspension of Trading 

October 19, 2010. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Cape 

Systems Group, Inc. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended December 31, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Caribbean 

Cigar Company because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended September 30, 1998. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Casual Male 

Corp. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

February 3, 2001. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Cell Power 

Technologies, Inc. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended April 30, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Cellmetrix, 

Inc. (f/k/a BCAM International, Inc.) 

because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended June 30, 

2000. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Cellular 

Products, Inc. (n/k/a 872 Main Street 

Corp.) because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

December 31, 1994. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Ceptor 

Corp. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of CGS 

Scientific Corp. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended February 29, 2000. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Ciprico, Inc. 

because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

December 31, 2007. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed companies 

is suspended for the period from 9:30 

a.m. EDT on October 19, 2010, through 

11:59 p.m. EDT on November 1, 2010. 

By the Commission. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26698 Filed 10–19–10; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

The Social Security Administration 

(SSA) publishes a list of information 

collection packages requiring clearance 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in compliance with 

Public Law (Pub. L.) 104–13, the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

effective October 1, 1995. This notice 

includes a new information collection 

for OMB approval. 

SSA is soliciting comments on the 

accuracy of the agency’s burden 

estimate; the need for the information; 

its practical utility; ways to enhance its 

quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to 

minimize burden on respondents, 

including the use of automated 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices 65047 

1On October 7, 2010, UP supplemented its notice 

of exemption. 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Mail, e-mail, or 

fax your comments and 

recommendations on the information 

collection to the OMB Desk Officer and 

SSA Reports Clearance Officer to the 

following addresses or fax numbers. 

(OMB), Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA. 

Fax: 202–395–6974. E-mail address: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

(SSA), Social Security Administration, 

DCBFM, Attn: Reports Clearance 

Officer, 1333 Annex Building, 6401 

Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235. 

Fax: 410–965–6400. E-mail address: 

OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov. 

SSA has submitted the information 

collection listed below to OMB for 

clearance. Your comments on the 

information collection would be most 

useful if OMB and SSA receive them 

within 30 days from the date of this 

publication. To be sure we consider 

your comments, we must receive them 

no later than November 22, 2010. You 

can obtain a copy of the OMB clearance 

package by calling the SSA Reports 

Clearance Officer at 410–965–8783 or by 

writing to the above e-mail address. 

Benefit Offset National 

Demonstration—0960–NEW. SSA is 

undertaking the Benefit Offset National 

Demonstration (BOND)—a 

demonstration and evaluation of policy 

changes and services on the Social 

Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) 

program—in an effort to produce strong 

evidence about the effectiveness of 

potential solutions that would improve 

the historically very low rate of return 

to work among SSDI beneficiaries. 

Under current law, Social Security 

beneficiaries lose their SSDI benefit if 

they have earnings and/or work activity 

above the threshold of Substantial 

Gainful Activity after completing the 

Trial Work Period and two-month grace 

period. The benefit-offset component of 

this demonstration will reduce benefits 

by $1 for each $2 in earnings above the 

BOND threshold, resulting in a gradual 

reduction in benefits as earnings 

increase. 

The experimental design for BOND 

will test a benefit offset alone and in 

conjunction with enhanced work 

incentives counseling. The central 

research questions include: 

• What is the effect of the benefit 

offset alone on employment and other 

outcomes? 

• What is the effect of the benefit 

offset in combination with enhanced 

work incentives counseling on 

employment and other outcomes? 

The proposed public survey data 

collections will have four components— 

an impact study, a cost-benefit analysis, 

a participation analysis, and a process 

study. The data collections are a 

primary source for data to measure the 

effects of a more generous benefit offset 

and the provision of enhanced work 

incentives counseling on SSDI 

beneficiaries’ work efforts and earnings. 

Ultimately, these data will benefit 

researchers, policy analysts, policy 

makers and the United States Congress 

in a wide range of program areas. The 

effects of BOND on the well-being of 

SSDI beneficiaries could manifest 

themselves in many dimensions and 

could be relevant to an array of other 

public programs. This project offers the 

first opportunity to obtain reliable 

measures of these effects based upon a 

nationally representative sample. The 

long-term indirect benefits of this 

research are therefore likely to be 

substantial. Respondents are SSDI 

beneficiaries and concurrent SSDI and 

Supplemental Security Income 

beneficiaries who we randomly assign 

to the study (Stage 1), and SSDI 

beneficiaries who agree to participate in 

the study (Stage 2). 

Type of Request: Request for a new 

information collection. 

Note: This is a correction notice. We 

updated the burden figures, shown below, 

since we published the 60-day Federal 

Register Notice for this collection on August 

12, 2010 at 75 FR 49013. 

Survey Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Number of 

responses 

Average burden 

per response 

(minutes) 

Total annual 

burden 

(hours) 

Participation Agreement ................................... 12,600 1 12,600 20 4,200 

Baseline Survey ............................................... 12,600 1 12,600 41 8,610 

Interim Survey .................................................. 10,080 1 10,080 29 4,872 

Stage 1 36-month Survey ................................ 8,000 1 8,000 49 6,533 

Stage 2 36-month Survey ................................ 10,080 1 10,080 60 10,080 

Enhanced Work Incentives Assessment ......... 3,000 1 3,000 35 1,750 

Key Informant Interviews ................................. 100 7 700 60 700 

Stage 2 Participant Focus Groups .................. 600 1 600 90 900 

Totals ........................................................ 57,060 ............................ 57,660 ............................ 37,645 

Dated: October 15, 2010. 

Faye Lipsky, 

Reports Clearance Officer, Center for Reports 

Clearance, Social Security Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26384 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Surface Transportation Board 

[Docket No. AB 33 (Sub-No. 289X)] 

Union Pacific Railroad Company— 

Abandonment Exemption—in Pulaski 

County, AR 

Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) 

filed a verified notice of exemption 

under 49 CFR part 1152 subpart F– 

Exempt Abandonments to abandon a 

4.04-mile portion of its Camp Robinson 

Spur extending from milepost 345.64 to 

the end of the line at milepost 349.68, 

in Pulaski County, Ark.1 The line 

traverses United States Postal Service 

Zip Code 72118. 

UP has certified that: (1) No local 

traffic has moved over the line for at 

least 2 years; (2) there is no overhead 

traffic on the line to be rerouted; (3) no 

formal complaint filed by a user of rail 

service on the line (or by a State or local 

government entity acting on behalf of 

such user) regarding cessation of service 

over the line either is pending with the 

Surface Transportation Board (Board) or 

with any U.S. District Court or has been 

decided in favor of complainant within 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES