alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers begins Phase I flood fight activities  Updated: March 9, 2023
   VICKSBURG, Miss. -- The Mississippi Valley Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) coordinates all flood fight activities in the Mississippi Valley. Currently, the Memphis, and New Orleans Districts have begun Phase I flood fight activities.
The Lower Mississippi Valley is currently forecast to receive 1-2 inches of rainfall over the next seven days.
The lower White River basin, a tributary of the Mississippi River within the Memphis District, is experiencing minor to moderate flooding and is currently near crest levels. This area is forecast to begin falling next week. These stages have prompted the Memphis District to begin Phase 1 activation of their Emergency Management Office. Although there is minor flooding on this tributary, the Mississippi River at Memphis is forecast to crest approximately 5 feet below minor flood stage.
Within New Orleans District, the Mississippi River at Red River Landing and New Orleans are forecast to crest slightly above Phase I activation level but are forecasted to begin falling in the next 7-14 days. New Orleans District has also begun Phase 1 operations.
The USACE Emergency Operations Center in Memphis, and New Orleans Districts directs all flood fight activities in its area of responsibility in conjunction with the affected states, levee districts, and other local interest groups.
During Phase I flood fight activities, USACE personnel deploy to the affected areas and monitor all federal flood control works including levees, flood walls, and pumping stations They will also continue to monitor rainfall amounts in the affected areas, and National Weather Service forecasts to determine if further action is warranted. USACE will deploy additional personnel and resources as required to help ensure the safety of life and property.
Material assistance may be provided with close coordination with state and local authorities. Material assistance may include portable pumps to remove water from flooded areas, plastic sheeting to cover levees and help minimize levee slides and erosion, and sandbags.
Citizens are strongly encouraged to stay in touch with their local authorities and emergency management officials for updates on conditions in their areas.
The federal flood control works in the Mississippi Valley protect many thousands of homes, millions of lives, and vast tracts of fertile cropland.
-end-
 Release no. 23-001
# Sitemap

## November 29, 2023

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2023
- 11
- November 29, 2023

            - Discovery Alert: Watch the Synchronized Dance of a 6-Planet System
            - The Marshall Star for November 29, 2023
            - NASA Remembers Trailblazing Astronaut, Scientist Mary Cleave
            - NASA Tests In-Flight Capability of Artemis Moon Rocket Engine
            - Announcing the New Heliophysics Division Director 
            - The Beginnings of a Sunrise
            - NASA’s Europa Clipper Mission
            - NASA, Small Companies Eye New Cargo Delivery, Heat Shield Technologies
            - Astrobotic’s Peregrine Mission One
            - Ham Radio in Space: Engaging with Students Worldwide for 40 Years
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 181 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 181

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
          the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2017

Mr. Gaetz (for himself, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Williams, Mr. 
 Rokita, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Bacon) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
          the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

Whereas the Supreme Court has had a vacant seat since the death of Justice 
        Antonin Scalia;
Whereas Neil Gorsuch is a defender of the intrinsic value of human life;
Whereas Neil Gorsuch is a defender of religious liberty;
Whereas Neil Gorsuch is a constitutional conservative who will honor the ideals 
        of our Founding Fathers; and
Whereas Neil Gorsuch was previously nominated to the Tenth Circuit Court of 
        Appeals and confirmed by the Senate unanimously: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the House firmly supports the nomination of Neil 
        Gorsuch to the Supreme Court; and
            (2) the Senate should hold a swift confirmation of this 
        nomination.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a teleconference meeting of the Spinal Cord Injury & Regenerative Medicine Subcommittee of the Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Scientific Merit Review Board will be held November 4, 2010, in Room 933 at the Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 I Street, NW., Washington, DC, at 2 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public for the discussion, examination, reference to,                           ( print page 65405)                        and oral review of the research proposals and critiques.                

The purpose of the Board is to review rehabilitation research and development applications and advise the Director, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, and the Chief Research and Development Officer on the scientific and technical merit, the mission relevance, and the protection of human and animal subjects.

During the meeting, discussion and recommendations will include qualifications of the personnel conducting the studies (the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy), as well as research information (the premature disclosure of which would likely compromise significantly the implementation of proposed agency action regarding such research projects). As provided by subsection 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended by Public Law 94-409, closing the meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (9)(B).

                    For further information, please contact Tiffany Asqueri, Designated Federal Officer, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 461-1740 or                     *tiffany.asqueri@va.gov.*

Dated: October 18, 2010.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-26556 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK>     0000891098
<NAME>     Sterling Bancshares Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          68,849
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                53,635
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     96,795
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         170,122
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           170,239
<LOANS>                                      1,100,795
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (12,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,548,838
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,354,635
<SHORT-TERM>                                    28,264
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,181
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,750
<PREFERRED>                                        139
<COMMON>                                        25,879
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,548,838
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,834
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,186
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,211
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,231
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,321
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           41,910
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,786
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 38,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,717
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,717
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,498
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.17
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,284
<LOANS-PAST>                                       190
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   220
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 26,973
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,829
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (2,182)
<RECOVERIES>                                       360
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,793
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,681
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,112


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                                                    ------------

                             PDS GAMING CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDS Gaming Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Johan P. Finley, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Company, and Peter D. Cleary, President, Chief Operating Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Office and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



     By:     /s/  Johan P. Finley                    Dated:  November 12, 2002
            --------------------------------------
             Johan P. Finley
     Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman



     By:     /s/  Peter D. Cleary                    Dated:  November 12, 2002
            --------------------------------------
             Peter D. Cleary
     Title:  President, Chief Operating Officer,
             Interim Chief Financial Office and
             Treasurer


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE J. TAYLOR.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTONIO MUGAVERO.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. See *State v. O’Connor,*105 *N.J.*399 (1987), and *State v. Hartye,*105 *N.J.*411 (1987).
#### In re CLEARLY CANADIAN SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to: all actions.

No. C-93-1037-VRW.

MDL No. 993.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 23, 1997.

ORDER

WALKER, District Judge.

The parties in this action have requested reconsideration of the court’s order of May 28, 1997. Having considered the parties’ submissions and the arguments made by counsel at the status conference held on June 20, 1997, the court finds that reconsideration is appropriate at this time. Accordingly, the court’s order of May 28, 1997, 966 F.Supp. 930, is VACATED. Plaintiffs are directed to file their motion not later than July 7, 1997. Defendant may file them response, if any, not later than July 21,1997. Plaintiffs may file a reply memorandum not later than July 28, *6131997. The court will hear oral argument on the motion on August 1,1997.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
#### UNITED SECURITY SERVICE, INC., ETC. v. DAVID CRONHEIM MANAGEMENT CO. INC.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00202

- CV

Big Lots Stores, Inc. , Appellant

v.

Beth McLaughlin , Appellee

FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 20

- 2188

, THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Big Lots Stores, Inc. has filed an unopposed moti on to dismiss this

appeal. We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________

Thomas J. B aker , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 20, 2022
#### Champs, Appellant, *v.*Stone, Appellee.

(No. 6337

Decided November 22, 1943.)

*Mr. Louis R. Rehear,*for appellant.

*Mr. Walter W. Harris,*for appellee.

Ross, P. J.

The notice of appeal filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county contains the statement that the appellant “does hereby give notice to the defendant appellee, Dr. Emmons B. Stone, of his intention to appeal on questions of. law to the Court of Appeals of the First District of Ohio, Hamilton county, from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county, Ohio, in the above styled caption cause and case.”

Laying aside the question of whether this is a notice of appeal within the meaning of Section 12223-5, General Code, and might be subject to amendment, an examination of the transcript of docket and journal entries as well as the original papers filed in this court develops that no final order was entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county, Ohio.

On June 9, 1943, the jury was directed to bring in a verdict in favor of the defendant. It complied with such direction and the verdict appears among the papers. On June 10,1943, motion for a new trial was. filed and on June 21,1943, such motion was overruled. On June 23, 1943, the notice of appeal referred to was filed. No judgment ivas entered on the verdict.

*320The trial consisted only of the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff. Motion was made for “judgment on the opening statement of counsel.”

The motion for new trial was therefore entirely ineffective for any purpose, no factual issues having been considered by the court. See Section 11575, General Code; *Cullen*v. *Schmit,*137 Ohio St., 479, 30 N. E. (2d), 994.

If a final judgment had been entered before the motion was filed, the filing of such motion would not have affected the rights of either party.

In the bill of exceptions it appears that the court granted the motion for judgment made by the appellee. The transcript shows:

‘ ‘ The said jury having heard the testimony adduced, counsel for defendants moved the court for an instructed verdict, the court being fully advised in the premises grants said motion, and instructs the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, which was accordingly done, to wit: **** V’

Can this be considered a final judgment in the case1? Obviously not, for, thereafter, in pursuance of such order the jury did render the verdict. Although the effect of such formalities is to render a judgment for defendant, actually such was not done. Final'judgment should have been entered on the verdict.

Such being the state of the record, there is nothing before this court to sustain an appeal, and the appeal is therefore dismissed *sua sponte.*

*Appeal dismissed.*

Hildebrant and Matthews, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Executive
Chairman of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  May 15, 2009                              By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE J. GRANT.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMITMENT OF M.M.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30755

Summary Calendar

SAMUEL TYRONE JEFFERS

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MAI TRAN, Camp J Doctor

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:07-CV-329

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Samuel Tyrone Jeffers, Louisiana prisoner # 127810,

filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Mai Tran and others alleging that

Dr. Tran acted with deliberate indifference and retaliated against him by

withholding medical treatment for his filing grievances against her. The other

defendants were dismissed from the suit. The district court granted Dr. Tran’s

motion for summary judgment and denied Jeffers’s motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, certifying that the appeal was not taken in

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 23, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30755

2

good faith. Jeffers seeks leave from this court to proceed IFP so that he may

challenge the summary judgment in favor of Dr. Tran. By doing so, he

challenges the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197,

203 (5th Cir. 1997). The m edi cal reco rds and Dr. Tran’ s a ffid a v it

demonstrate that Dr. Tran consistently provided treatment to Jeffers for his

various complaints of foot and toe pain, hearing and ear problems, and allergies,

and that she did so both before and after he filed the two Administrative Remedy

Procedure complaints that are in the record. Jeffers failed to submit any

competent summary judgment evidence showing a denial of treatment or other

conduct rising to the level of deliberate indifference with respect to medical care.

See Domino v. Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just., 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001).

Similarly, there is no evidence or chronology from which to infer that Dr. Tran

refused treatment as a retaliatory measure. See Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161,

1166 (5th Cir. 1995). Jeffers’ uncorroborated assertions are insufficient to defeat

summary judgment. See Turner v. Baylor Richardson Med. Ctr., 476 F.3d 337,

343 (5th Cir. 2007).

As it is plain that any appeal would be frivolous, see Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983), we dismiss the instant appeal sua sponte. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as

frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Jeffers is cautioned that if he

accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed IFP in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; IFP MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
1 min read

# NASA Rolls Out Lunar Tires at Monster Jams

### Doreen Zudell

#### Editor

### Glenn Communications

Mar 13, 2024

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

**Credit: NASA/Heather Brown**

Few things rev the engines of Monster Jam fans more than tires—including lunar tires. NASA’s Glenn Research Center recently gained traction with amplified audiences at Monster Jams in Milwaukee, Jan. 20-21, and in Cleveland, Feb. 16-17. During pit parties, NASA’s outreach team rolled out its replica lunar rover tire to show visitors the work NASA is doing on space tires.

**Credit: NASA/Heather Brown**

The exhibit also included an inflatable Mars rover, First Woman comic backdrop, and distribution of solar eclipse glasses and eclipse path maps.   

**Credit: NASA/Heather Brown**

Additionally, Grave Digger driver Krysten Anderson and El Toro Loco driver Armando Castro visited NASA Glenn in Cleveland to see how future tires for the Moon and Mars are designed and tested.  

**Credit:****NASA/Steven Logan**

## Explore More

1 min readNASA Glenn Visits Duluth for Air and Aviation Expo, STEAM Festival  Article										2 days ago									

1 min readTECH Day at NASA Attracts Middle School Students Article										2 days ago									

2 min readNASA Glenn’s Yvette Harris Inducted into MBA Hall of Fame Article										2 days ago
# Sitemap

## January 30, 2010

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2010
- 01
- January 30, 2010

            - NLCs As Seen From the ISS