alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

****In connection with the QuarterlyReport of DrugMax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Ronald J. Patrick, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
# STS-5

S82-35627 (20 Aug. 1982) --- This is the official crew patch for the fifth (note five points of the star)...

S82-36286 (15 Aug. 1982) --- These four men will be aboard the space shuttle Columbia for NASA's first operational Space...

S82-39532 (11 Nov. 1982) --- Having completed its four-mission test program, the space shuttle Columbia begins a new era of...

STS005-45-1821 (11-16 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut William B. Lenoir, STS-5 mission specialist, takes a break to eat his meal on...

STS005-15-588 (13 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut Robert F. Overmyer, STS-5 pilot, enjoys a meal from a jury-rigged set-up in the...

S82-39790 (11-15 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut Joseph P. Allen IV, STS-5 mission specialist, lets a spot-meter float freely for a...

STS005-07-267 (12 Nov. 1982) --- A pre-set 35mm camera?s exposure of all four STS-5 astronaut crew members reveals a bit...

STS005-03-110 (11-16 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut William B. Lenoir, STS-5 mission specialist, holding a 70mm HASSELBLAD camera, observes scenery through...

STS005-06-210 (16 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut Vance D. Brand (in dark blue shirt), STS-5 commander; Robert F. Overmyer (left), pilot;...

STS005-07-235 (11-16 Nov. 1982) --- Astronaut William B. Lenoir, mission specialist for STS-5, uses scissors and a brush to trim...

STS005-10-376 (11-16 Nov. 1982) --- Half of the four-member astronaut crew for the Earth-orbiting space shuttle Columbia's STS-5 mission is...

STS005-04-124 (14 Nov. 1982) --- Three members of the four-man STS-5 crew demonstrate the zero-gravity environment aboard the Earth-orbiting space...
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0965 Lower Tribunal No. 20-473

________________ 

### L.F.P. Jr., a juvenile, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando A. Prescott, Judge. L.F.P. Jr., a juvenile, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Andrew C. Traeger, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, certify:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2014 through October 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 3, 2014 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2014-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date: January 8,   2016 | John Deere Capital   Corporation |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         | By                               | /s/ *Andrew C. Traeger* |   |
|                         |                             | Andrew C. Traeger |
|                         |                             | Senior Vice President   and Controller |
|                              |                                  |  |  |  |

 

----
# Sitemap

## February 24, 2012

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2012
- 02
- February 24, 2012

            - Spray Bars to Help Test Engine Icing
            - Facilities Support Center Groundbreaking
            - Preview of a Forthcoming Supernova
            - Students Shaping America’s Next Spacecraft
            - Silver Snoopy Award to Gray Creech
            - Preview of a Forthcoming Supernova
            - Preview of a Forthcoming Supernova
Exhibit 10.1


 


 



 


April 24, 2020


 


Cabell Lolmaugh


[Address Omitted]


 


Dear Cabby:


 


This letter memorializes
our recent discussions regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact on our community, our
economy, and Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


You have voluntarily
agreed, during the Specified Period (as defined below), to (i) reduce your rate of base salary by 20% from your current rate of
base salary of $350,000.00 (your “Regular Salary”) to a rate of base salary of $280,000.00 (your “Reduced
Salary”) and (ii) work from your home at the address set forth above underneath your name (your “Home Location”)
and/or your principal office location (your “Regular Location”) as contemplated by the employment agreement
between the Company and you dated February 19, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”). The “Specified Period”
shall mean the period commencing on April 16, 2020 and continuing until the Board of Directors of the Company otherwise determines.


 


For the avoidance of
doubt, for all purposes of the definitions of “Constructive Termination” and “Good Reason” set forth in
the Employment Agreement, references to your “annual base salary” shall mean your Reduced Salary and references to
your “principal office location” shall mean your Home Location and/or your Regular Location, in each case, during the
Specified Period.


 


Notwithstanding the
foregoing, for all purposes of subparagraph (A) of the “Severance” paragraph of the Employment Agreement, determinations
made by reference to your “base salary” shall be based on your Regular Salary during the Specified Period.


 


Except as modified
hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please indicate your
agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best Regards,


 


TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.


 


 


By:/s/ Nancy DiMattia                 


Name: Nancy DiMattia


Title: Chief Financial Officer


 


Acknowledged and Agreed as of April
24, 2020:


 


 


 


/s/ Cabell Lolmaugh                     


Cabell Lolmaugh


 








    THE TILE SHOP | 14000 CARLSON PARKWAY | PLYMOUTH MN 55441 |
888-398-6595
#### GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 26, 1944 —

Decided September 14, 1944.

For the appellant, *Samuel Rosenblatt*and *Joseph J. Corn.*

For the respondents, *Brunetto & Welsh.*

*170Per. Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
#### MARILYN M. COWAN v. ALEXANDRE ACKAD, M.D.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 215 *N.J.Super.*484)
Order entered October 6, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00827-CR

No. 05-21-00828-CR

PRESTON OLIN BURKLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F20-40748-P & F20-40749-P

ORDER

This appeal was set for oral argument on September 27, 2022, and counsel 

for appellant and the State were present. Before argument, appellant’s counsel 

apprised the Court that he had to attend to a medical emergency. Thereafter, the 

Justices on the panel conferred off the record and determined that oral argument 

would not significantly aid them in determining the legal and factual issues 

presented in the appeal. 
Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without oral argument on 

September 27, 2022.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,330,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,528,148
<PP&E>                                         182,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,512,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,035,817
<BONDS>                                         75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,877
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,512,305
<SALES>                                      5,488,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,488,844
<CGS>                                        3,139,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,935,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,631)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (687,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,097
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (688,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (688,965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENISE SANTOS.

May 12, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,471
<SECURITIES>                                     1,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,052)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,810
<PP&E>                                         116,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,223
<BONDS>                                         43,436
<COMMON>                                           187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,159
<SALES>                                         58,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,151
<CGS>                                           43,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (752)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,307)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,927,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  222,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,149,031
<PP&E>                                      52,340,547
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,423,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,066,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,066,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,066,144
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,192,578
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,395,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   715,940
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Sitemap

## September 17, 2009

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2009
- 09
- September 17, 2009

            - STS-128 Discovery Prepares for Ferry Flight
            - Test of Futuristic X-48C is Historic Wind Tunnel’s Swan Song
            - Next Station Commander Shares Training, Flight on Twitter and Blog
            - Cassini Significant Events 09/09/09 – 09/15/09
# Moore selected as new MVD chief of Real Estate Division and lead for Upper Mississippi District Support Team

VICKSBURG, Miss., November 8, 2013 – Mark Moore was selected as the Mississippi Valley Division’s (MVD) Regional Chief of Real Estate and Lead for the District Support Team (Upper Mississippi) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. His job duties include serving as the regional expert for Real Estate issues, and he is responsible for managing civil works projects for MVD’s three northern districts; St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul.

Moore began his Corps career as a Department of the Army intern in the Corps Little Rock District, in 1986. He has more than 27 years of experience in division and district real estate roles. In 1988, Moore worked as a realty specialist for Corps’ Fort Worth District. Following his return from deployment to Saudi Arabia in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm in 1990, Moore worked for the Staff Engineer for the 5th U.S. Army in San Antonio, Texas, providing Army Real Estate support for the U.S. Army Reserves in 14 states.  In 1992, Moore returned to the Fort Worth District where he was promoted to chief, Acquisition Branch in 1994. In 2001, he was selected as the chief, Real Estate Division for the Corps' Little Rock District.

In 2008, Moore worked as a realty specialist for the Corps' Southwestern Division, coordinating all Army BRAC Real Estate disposal actions west of the Mississippi River. After realizing how much he missed being in a management and leadership role, he applied for, and was selected as the chief, Real Estate Division in Tulsa, Okla.

Moore is a native of Scott, Ark., and attended England Public Schools. He received his bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. He is also a graduate of the Army Management Staff College and served on active duty as a United States Marine for six years. 

Moore is married to the former Cheryl (Gail) Overby from Winston-Salem, NC, and they have two adult children, Mark Jr. and Maria.

The Mississippi Valley Division is responsible for water resources engineering solutions in a 370,000-square-mile area, extending from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico and encompassing portions of 12 states.  Work is carried out by district offices located in St. Paul, Minn.; Rock Island, Ill.; St. Louis, Mo.; Memphis, Tenn.; Vicksburg, Miss.; and New Orleans, La.

-end-

**Contact**

Release no. 13-021

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Mississippi Valley Division
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

APPEAL OF CLEFT OF THE ROCK

MINISTRIES IN REGARD TO

PROPERTY SITUATE AT 501 E. 9TH

AVENUE, BOROUGH OF MUNHALL,

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

(BLOCK & LOT NO. 130-1-250 AND

130-1-252

OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES: 

BOROUGH OF MUNHALL, STEEL

VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

PETITION OF: CLEFT OF THE ROCK

MINISTRIES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 395 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AWARD CANCELLATION AGREEMENT




     This Award Cancellation Agreement (this “Agreement”), is made and entered into as of the
latest date set forth below, by and between _______________ (“Grantee”), and
Collective Brands, Inc. (“CBI”), with reference to the following facts:




	 	A.	 	Grantee was granted a Performance Share Unit award under the Collective Brands, Inc.
2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was evidenced by that certain Award
Agreement dated June 4, 2007 ( the “Award”);
	 
	 	B.	 	Pursuant to the Award, Grantee has the potential to earn shares of CBI Common Stock
based upon the appreciation of the price of CBI Common Stock;
	 
	 	C.	 	If payout under the Award were determined based on the value of CBI Common Stock
through the date hereof, Grantee would not be entitled to any payment;
	 
	 	D.	 	The Award has resulted in the recognition of certain financial accounting charges
against the earnings of CBI and would continue to cause CBI to incur additional charges
during the term of the Award;
	 
	 	E.	 	The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has
determined that consistent with the philosophical approach adopted by the Committee at its
March 1, 2007 meeting regarding events outside the normal course of business, the
accounting costs associated with the Award for fiscal year 2008 incurred by CBI for
executives who surrender their Awards shall be excluded from any incentive calculation
utilizing earnings in any form;
	 
	 	F.	 	CBI and Grantee desire to eliminate future charges against CBI earnings that would
result from the continuance of the Award;
	 
	 	G.	 	Grantee desires to accommodate CBI’s wishes and is willing to allow CBI to cancel the
Award in exchange for no additional consideration; and
	 
	 	H.	 	CBI and Grantee have agreed that it is in their mutual best interests to cancel the
Award.





     In consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt
of which by each party is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the Award is
hereby cancelled and the agreement evidencing the Award thereof, are terminated and shall
be of no further force or effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement as of the latest
date set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	GRANTEE	 	 	 	COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2014

No. 04-14-00857-CR

Andrew MENDOZA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3452A

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court=s certification in this appeal states that Athis criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ The clerk=s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court=s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, AThe appeal must be dismissed if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record 

under these rules.@ TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant 

causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of 

this order showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order). All other appellate 

deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERIC WILTSHIRE.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.