alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mississippi River & Tributaries Project

Authorized Work Remaining Necessary 

to Convey the Project Design Flood 

September 2019

Main Stem System Components:

Levees & Floodwalls:

MS River : Project is ~85% complete

 237 miles of levee remain to be enlarged and

raised.

 251 miles of levee require seepage

remediation.

 16 miles of floodwall do not meet stability

standards & require structural evaluation.

 30 miles of levee require bank stability.

Atchafalaya Floodway: Project is ~65% complete

 144 miles of levee remain to be enlarged/raised

 13 miles of floodwall do not meet stability

standards & require structural evaluation.

MS River Channel Improvements: Project is ~92% complete 

 76 miles of revetments to be constructed &

extended.

 29 miles of revetment to be reinforced.

 34 miles of dikes to be constructed or extended.

 20 miles of dikes to be raised.

Atchafalaya Floodway Structures:

 Bayou Sorrel, Berwick, & Bayou Boeuf

navigation locks are below design elevation.

 Charenton, East Calumet, & West Calument

floodgate replacements.

 Yellow Bayou Pump Station requires

reconstruction.

Tributary Components:

 Levees & Floodwalls:

 33 levee reaches remain to be enlarged &

raised to design grade.

 23 levee segments require geotechnical

evaluation to determine seepage

remediation measure.

 Channel Improvements:

 Approximately 570 miles of channels

require stabilization.

 Approximately 70 miles of channel remain

to be enlarged.

 One dike remains to be constructed.

 Structures:

 Various grade control structures and

drainage structures require evaluation.

MR&T Maintenance: 

 Completed portions of the system require

ongoing operations and maintenance to

continue to perform properly into the future.

 Proper operation and maintenance of the

individual features of the system is critical for

the overall project to perform as intended.

 Due to dynamic river conditions, impacts

from flood events, and system operation,

increased flood fighting activities and

enhanced readiness are required.

MR&T System Component Funds Required to Complete All 

Remaining Items

Funds Required to Complete Most 

Critical Items*

Main Stem Improvements Total: $7.3 B $3.7 B

Levees / Floodwalls $3.6 B $1.6 B

MS River Levee (MRL) $2.3 B $886 M 

Atchafalaya River $1.3 B $795 M

Channel Improvement $2.8 B $1.1 B

Revetment $2.1 B $318 M

Dikes $748 M $816 M

Structures (Atchafalaya Floodway) $874 M $874 M

Tributary Improvements Total: $1.4 B -

NOTE:

*Critical items are defined as items with urgent construction needs that pose the greatest

performance concern and higher probability of catastrophic consequences.

 Due to dynamic river conditions and continued inspections and evaluations, data is subject to

change.

MISSISSIPPI River Commission

Data reflective of August 2019 update to MR&T Strategic Investment Plan Main Stem Projects.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT V. LOUIS.

May 19, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### WILLIAM G. DOSS v. CHRISTOPHER DIETZ, ET AL.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ELLA J. FIBISH AND FRANK FIBISH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HARRY BENNETT AND SELMA BENNETT, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted May 26, 1944

Decided September 14, 1944.

For the appellants, *George F. Losche.*

For the respondents, *Beufert*cG *Elmore (Charles Fishberg,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter for the Supreme Court.

The rent sued for was not for the last three months, but 'that is not material.

The opinion states that under the lease the tenant is liable for rent for the term, “irrespective of why the premises were vacated, whether by a voluntary vacation by the tenant or by an eviction by lawful proceedings.” We need only decide that this is so where the “eviction by lawful proceedings” is the result of the default of the tenant in the discharge of an obligation imposed on him by the lease; and such was the casé here.

*For affirmance*— -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Siguler Guff Small Business Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ending
          December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean Greene, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date: March 28, 2019
  /s/ Sean Greene Name:
            Sean GreeneTitle:
            President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        37496686
<SECURITIES>                                      5767
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9006307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1060853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              46525549
<PP&E>                                       309853595
<DEPRECIATION>                                53488529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               367746580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         48448985
<BONDS>                                      253484013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        357221
<OTHER-SE>                                    66727346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 367746580
<SALES>                                      198233557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             198233557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                180184559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (1501091)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            23703909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4153820)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (1935000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           18048998
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2218818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
fr '

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

ELLIOTT TRAVIS BACON.

Petitioner,

v.

CAPTAIN ROGER BODINE,

OP 21-0073

FILED

MAR 0 2 2021

Bowen C3 reenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

Yellowstone County Detention Center,

Respondent.

ORDER

Elliott Travis Bacon has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, indicating that

his incarceration is illegal. Bacon raises two challenges. First, he claims that he is

erroneously charged because "they have [his] name on [his] twin Brother[']s Social

Security Number. In the Police Reports and charging documents." Second, due to the

limited transport of inmates and his lengthy incarceration, he contends that he was not

provided proper medical attention after contracting the COVID-19. Bacon requests his

release and reinstatement of his parole.

As a petitioner, Bacon carries the "burden of proof or the burden of persuasion."

In re Hart, 178 Mont. 235, 249, 583 P.2d 411, 419 (1978). Bacon has not met his burden

of proof for this Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus. Bacon provides no information

about his charges, parole revocation, or the District Court where he is being prosecuted.

Bacon must prove "the violation, deprivation, infringement, or denial of his constitutional,

statutory, or legal rights generally, or denial of due process of law[d"

In re Hart, 178 Mont. at 250, 583 P.2d at 419. He has not done so.

Montana's statute for habeas corpus relief provides that a court may inquire into the

cause of restraint or incarceration. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Bacon has not provided

any facts to support a legal claim. Bacon has not clearly articulated any argument about

illegal restraint, want of bail, or other claims viable warranting habeas corpus relief. Upon

03/02/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0073
review of the little information presented, Bacon is not entitled to release from the

Yellowstone County Detention Center or reinstatement of his parole. He has not carried

his burden or presented a record sufficient to make a prima facie showing of the illegality

of his incarceration. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Bacon's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

without prejudice.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to

Captain Roger Bodine, to counsel of record, and to Elliott Travis Bacon personally.

DATED this 2, day of March, 2021.

Chief Justice
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-10789

_______________________ In The Matter Of: DON RAY DIXON; DANA DENE DIXON, Debtors, WILLIAM M. RAVKIND, Appellant,

versus DALE WOOTTON, Trustee, Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:92-CV-2004-P)

_________________________________________________________________ May 10, 1996 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has considered appellant’s position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,

we find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the bankruptcy and district
courts.AFFIRMED
.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements
                           of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the
                           Company.

Date:  February 17, 2004                       By:       /s/ Zsolt Rumy
       -----------------                          ---------------------------
                                                          Zsolt Rumy
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7060

JASON A. MORANT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Acting Director of the

Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-02-748-2)

Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 30, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason A. Morant, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason A. Morant seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, ,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morant has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,  Wilmington Trust, National Association,  as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

3.              A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

4.              To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

                                                                                                

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                         

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PRESTON L. ROBINSON.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

On October 12, 2010 (75 FR 63144-63145), the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights announced a business meeting to be held on Friday, October 22, 2010 at the Commission's headquarters. On Monday, October 18, 2010, the meeting was cancelled. The decision to cancel the meeting was too close in time to the date and time of the meeting for the publication of a cancellation notice to appear in advance of the scheduled meeting date. The details of the cancelled meeting are:

# Date and Time:

Friday, October 22, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

# Place:

624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. Program Planning.
      - Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report.
      - Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing Report on English-Only in the Workplace.
      - Consideration of Policy on Commissioner Statements and Rebuttals.
      - Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College Admissions—Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
      - Update on Clearinghouse Project.

III. State Advisory Committee Issues.
      - Kentucky SAC.
      - Maryland SAC.
      - Vermont SAC.

IV. Staff Director's Report.

V. Announcements.

VI. Approval of Minutes of October 8 Meeting.

VII. Adjourn.

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: October 19, 2010.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-26751 Filed 10-19-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
2 min read

# F/A-18 Mission Support Aircraft

### Armstrong Communications

#### NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center

Nov 05, 2015

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

Three F/A-18 Hornet aircraft are flown at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, for research support and pilot proficiency. The aircraft were obtained from the U.S. Navy between 1984 and 1991. One has a two-seat cockpit while the others are single-seat aircraft. NASA research support aircraft are commonly called chase planes and fill the role of escort aircraft during research missions.

Chase pilots are in constant radio contact with research pilots and serve as an “extra set of eyes” to help maintain total flight safety during specific tests and maneuvers. They monitor certain events for the research pilot and are an important safety feature on all research missions.

Chase aircraft also are used as camera platforms for research missions that must be documented with photographs or video. Aeronautical engineers monitor and verify various aspects of a research project by extensively using photos and video.

The two-seat F/A-18 support aircraft is normally used for photo or video chase. The aircraft is configured to transmit live video back to Armstrong so engineers can visually monitor the mission as it is flown. This feature greatly enhances flight safety.

The F/A-18 fleet is also used by Armstrong research pilots for the routine flight training and proficiency required of all NASA pilots.

The formal designation of the aircraft is F/A-18, corresponding to the dual fighter-attack role of the Hornets in the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps. McDonnell Douglas, now The Boeing Company of St. Louis, Missouri, built the aircraft.

## Aircraft Specifications

            - Two General Electric F404 turbofan engines power the aircraft, each producing 17,700 pounds (8028.58 kilograms) of thrust.
            - Top speed is more than Mach 1.8 (1190 mph).
            - Wingspan is 40 feet, 4 inches (12.29 meters), while the length is 56 feet (17.06 meters).
            - Typical gross weight of the aircraft is about 40,000 pounds.

## Share

                  -   
                  -   
                  -   
                  -   

## Details

Armstrong Flight Research Center

## Related Terms

                - Armstrong Flight Research Center
                - Aeronautics
                - NASA Aircraft
                - Science in the Air

## Explore More

5 min readNASA’s Commitment to Safety Starts with its CultureArticle										3 days ago									

3 min readNASA Uses Small Engine to Enhance Sustainable Jet ResearchArticle										4 days ago									

2 min readNASA Photographer Honored for Thrilling Inverted In-Flight ImageArticle										2 weeks ago									

## Discover More About Armstrong

Armstrong Capabilities & Facilities

Armstrong Aeronautics Projects

Armstrong Science Projects

Armstrong Space Projects
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

April 14, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan       
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BURNETT.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification dismissed as moot.
#### METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.