alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: SCHEDULE OF HOLIDAYS

FOR YEAR 2016 FOR STAFFS OF THE APPELLATE COURTS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS : : : : : : No. 440 Judicial Administration Docket

**ORDER PER**  **CURIA M:**  **AND NOW,**  this 19th day of December, 2014 , it is hereby ordered that the following paid holidays for calendar year 201 6 will be observed on the dates specified below by all employees of the appellate courts and the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts :

January 1, 2016 New Year’s Day January 18, 2016 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day February 15, 2016 Presidents’ Day March 25 , 2016 Good Friday May 30, 2016 Memorial Day July 4, 2016 Independence Day September 5, 2016 Labor Day October 10, 2016 Columbus Day November 8, 2016 Election Day** November 11, 2016 Veterans Day November 24, 2016 Thanksgiving Day November 25, 2016 Day after Thanksgiving December 26, 2016 Christmas Day (observed)

**AOPC only ; Appellate courts wi ll be ope n
.
Exhibit 4.20

 

Spousal Consent

 

Date: September 4, 2019

 

The undersigned, [Name of Spouse], a People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”) citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: [ID Card Number], is the lawful spouse of [Name of VIE Shareholder], a PRC citizen with PRC Identification No,: [ID Card Number]. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by [Name of VIE Shareholder] on September 4, 2019, and the disposal of the equity interests of Beijing Chiyan Medical Beauty Consulting Co., Ltd. (“Chiyan Medical Beauty”) held by [Name of VIE Shareholder] and registered in her name according to the following documents:

 

(1)                                The Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into with Beijing So-Young Wanwei Technology Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”) and Chiyan Medical Beauty;

 

(2)                                The Exclusive Option Agreement entered into with the WFOE and Chiyan Medical Beauty; and

 

(3)                                The Power of Attorney executed by [Name of VIE Shareholder].

 

I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Chiyan Medical Beauty which are held by [Name of VIE Shareholder]. I hereby further confirm that [Name of VIE Shareholder] can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without the authorization or consent from me.

 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as may be amended from time to time).

 

I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Chiyan Medical Beauty which are held by [Name of VIE Shareholder] for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Chiyan Medical Beauty as of September 4, 2019 (the “Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement”) (as may be amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Chiyan Medical Beauty. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (as may be amended from time to time).

 

	
/s/ [Name of Spouse]
    
	
[Name of Spouse]
    


 

 

 











 

Schedule of Material Differences

 

One or more persons entered into a spousal consent using this form. Pursuant to Instruction ii to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant may only file this form as an exhibit with a schedule setting forth the material details in which the executed agreements differ from this form:

 


	
No.
    	
 
    	
Name of Spouse
    	
 
    	
Name of VIE Shareholder
    
	
1
    	
 
    	
GAO Jie
    	
 
    	
JIN Xing
    
	
2
    	
 
    	
WANG Wenjie
    	
 
    	
YU Tao
H. Res. 1011 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 24, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 184) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on medical devices. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 

and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one 

motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6311) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Patient Protec-
2 

•HRES 1011 EH 

tion and Affordable Care Act to modify the definition of 

qualified health plan for purposes of the health insurance premium tax credit and to allow individuals purchasing health 

insurance in the individual market to purchase a lower premium copper plan. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 

Means, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115–83 shall be 

considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 

as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### WILLIAM SCHAIBLE, APPELLANT, v. CHAMPENOIS & CO., INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Argued October 19, 1944

Decided January 4, 1945.

For the appellant, *David Roshein.*

For the respondents, *Coult, Satz, Morse & Coult.*

*418Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskib, Porter, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— None.
# Sitemap

## January 24, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 01
- January 24, 2011

            - The Early Cosmos
            - The Early Cosmos
NEMEA HALL

,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THER EOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2820

Opinion filed September 17, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Nemea Hall, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathleen C. Hagan, Assistant Attorney

General, Ta llahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

LEWIS, C.J., PADOVANO and CLARK, JJ.

, CONCUR.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.L.T., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3538

[July 25, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Curtis Lee Disque, Judge; L.T. Case No. 43-2016-CJ000108.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY, JJ., and NUTT, JAMES, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CALVIN NESMITH.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY ARNOLD.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
Since October 2020, four massive pillar collapses have occurred in limestone 

mines. Each was accompanied by a powerful airblast and the formation of a 

large surface sinkhole. Fortunately they did not result in any injuries. In 2015, 

three miners were seriously injured by an airblast from a fifth pillar collapse. 

All of these collapses involved tall, slender pillars in benched areas. Four were in 

“legacy” areas that had been mined many years ago.

At this seminar, MSHA Technical Support’s Roof Control Division will be 

providing information to raise awareness of these collapse events. They will also 

present ways to assess and mitigate the risks associated with a massive 

collapses in both active workings and legacy areas.

Presentation topics:

1) Overview of recent limestone pillar collapse events

2) Limestone pillar design using the NIOSH S-Pillar program

3) Risk Analysis for limestone pillar collapse

4) Investigation and analysis of airblast risk from pillar collapse

The Seminar will be presented remotely via Microsoft TEAMS.

A certificate for four (4) Professional Development Hours (PDHs) will be 

provided to participants. Please register at least 3 business days prior to 

the seminar to receive the meeting invitation. 

To Register or Questions, email: Paulus.Jeffery@dol.gov

For more information, visit www.msha.gov/PillarInitiative 

MSHA MT PLEASANT DISTRICT

STONE MINE PILLAR COLLAPSE SEMINAR

November 9, 2021 8:00am - 12:00pm (ET)
H. Res. 1142 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 14, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6784) to 

provide for removal of the gray wolf in the contiguous 48 

States from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

published under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

November 19, 2018, through November 26, 2018— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous 

day shall be considered as approved; and 
2 

•HRES 1142 EH 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House 

adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits 

of clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to 

be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

SEC. 4. The provisions of section 7 of the War Powers 

Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1546) shall not apply to House Concurrent Resolution 138. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT31.2**CERTIFICATION     I, Laurie L. Latham, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ViewCast.com, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;   (b) [Intentionally omitted];   (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and   (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  November 14, 2007 /s/  Laurie L. Latham   Laurie L. Latham   Chief Financial Officer  
 ****
#### HARRISON ASSOCIATES, ETC. v. THE RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, ET AL.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 215 *N.J.Super.*1)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of 
employees from the Blockson Chemical Company in Joliet, Illinois, as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
September 3, 2010, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class 
of employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at the Blockson 
Chemical Company in Joliet, Illinois from March 1, 1951 to June 30, 
1960, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, 
occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with 
work days within the parameters established for one or more other 
classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

    This designation will become effective October 3, 2010, unless 
Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this 
effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can 
also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68285879586858285e8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692d2a283a292a2d2a472e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-26562 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10140 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCO ANTONIO RAMIREZ-LOPEZ, also known as Marcos Tulio Lopez, also known as Marvin Ramirez, also known as Mario Roberto Alvarado, also known as Ricar Machorro-Salas, also known as Marcos Tulio Lopez-Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-56-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marco Antonio Ramirez-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 990 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 990

  To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting Department of Defense 
civilian positions in facilities that perform depot maintenance or are 
designated as a center for industrial and technical excellence, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2017

 Mr. Cole (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Loebsack, 
  Mr. Kilmer, and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting Department of Defense 
civilian positions in facilities that perform depot maintenance or are 
designated as a center for industrial and technical excellence, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING FREEZE FROM AFFECTING DEPARTMENT OF 
              DEFENSE CIVILIAN POSITIONS AT CERTAIN FACILITIES.

    The memorandum titled ``Presidential Memorandum Regarding the 
Hiring Freeze'' published on January 23, 2017, or any other 
substantially similar memorandum, Executive order, or other action by 
the President to prevent a department or agency of the Federal 
Government from filling vacant Federal civilian employee positions or 
creating new such positions, shall have no force or effect with respect 
to any Department of Defense civilian position at, or in support of--
            (1) any facility at which depot-level maintenance and 
        repair (as that term is defined in section 2460 of title 10, 
        United States Code) is carried out; or
            (2) any facility designated under section 2474 of such 
        title as a center for industrial and technical excellence.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund - I on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Guggenheim Credit Income Fund - I , does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofGuggenheim Credit Income Fund - I.

Date:March 14, 2018/s/ Matthew S. BloomMATTHEW S. BLOOMChief Executive OfficerDate:March 14, 2018/s/ Paul S. Saint-PierrePAUL S. SAINT-PIERREChief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE AULBREY ROBINSON.

May 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.