alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,466
<SECURITIES>                                     8,061
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,418
<INVENTORY>                                        694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,672
<PP&E>                                          25,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,499
<BONDS>                                             60
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,292
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,257)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,615
<SALES>                                         11,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,650
<CGS>                                            1,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.411

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 176894 dated October 01, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

communication services for the purpose of broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Sputnikovoe TV

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1127746631495

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7709909783

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

51/4 bldg. 1 off. 125, h. 1, Shchepkina str., Moscow, 129110

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 01, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 16, 2019 No. 551-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliancefor COMM2014-UBS5 Commercial Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreementhas been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington,
D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated July 15, 2010 on our review of the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq
Healthcare, Inc. as of and for the nine month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 is incorporated by reference in the Companys Registration Statement
No. 333-72756. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.                         
|Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
Houston, Texas July 15,
2010
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Henry R. Mandell certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 2, 2005   /s/ Henry R. Mandell     Henry R. Mandell  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 911 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 911

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Carson of Indiana, 
 Mr. King of New York, Mr. Jones, Mr. Lance, Mr. MacArthur, Mr. Blum, 
Mr. Thomas J. Rooney of Florida, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Huffman, 
Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Keating, Mr. Swalwell of 
 California, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. Tsongas, and Mr. 
   Marino) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Aviation Safety Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall issue an order that requires--
            (1) on each covered aircraft the installation of a barrier, 
        other than the cockpit door, that prevents access to the flight 
        deck of the aircraft; and
            (2) for a covered aircraft--
                    (A) that is equipped with a cockpit door, that the 
                barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                while--
                            (i) the aircraft is in flight; and
                            (ii) the cockpit door separating the flight 
                        deck and the passenger area is open; and
                    (B) that is not equipped with a cockpit door, that 
                the barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                as determined appropriate by the pilot in command.
    (b) Covered Aircraft Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
aircraft'' means a commercial aircraft--
            (1) operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal 
        Regulations;
            (2) equipped with more than 75 passenger seats; and
            (3) with a maximum gross takeoff weight that exceeds 75,000 
        pounds.
                                 <all>
```
# Mississippi Valley Division News Releases

Mississippi Valley Division News Releases RSS Feed

- USACE Vicksburg, Memphis districts to host Virtual Small Business Industry Day VICKSBURG, Miss. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Vicksburg District and Memphis District will host their combined Virtual Small Business Industry Day Thursday, April 29, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# SUMMARY:

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.

                        Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to                         *Ross_A._Rutledge@omb.eop.gov*                         or fax to 202-395-3086.  Copies of submission may be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*OMB Number:*                     OMB 0412-New.                

*Form Number:*                     AID 321-2.                

*Title:*                     Mentor Protégé Program—Annual Report.                

*Type of Submission:*                     New Information Collection.                

*Purpose:*                     The mentors are required to report on the progress made under each active Mentor-Protégé Agreement annually throughout the term of the agreement. Each report is due 30 days after the end of each twelve-month period commencing with the start of the agreement.                

*Annual Reporting Burden:*

*Respondents:*                     30.                

*Total annual responses:*                     30.                

*Total annual hours requested:*                     360 hours.                

      ( print page 65297)    
Dated: October 8, 2010.

Beth Salamanca, 

Acting Director, Office of Management Services, Bureau for Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-26412 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
Exhibit 32.1



RF MONOLITHICS, INC.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, David M. Kirk, Chief Executive Officer and President of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of January, 2005.



/s/ David M. KirkName: David M. KirkTitle: Chief Executive Officer and President




*A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES LYNN.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
IN GENERAL TERM..

#### Julia Brennan and Patrick Brennan. *v.*Jebro Lucklear.

Appeal from Blair, Judge.

*Appeal*— Statutory *exceptions, to rule in*— Restraining order.

An appeal does not lie from, an order seitmg aside a temporary restraining order.

*Wallace*— *Heller-r*for appellee*

*Test, Burns 8f*Wright,. for appellants*

Newcomb, J.

The plaintiffs appealed from an order made-fey Judge Blair, setting aside a restraining order made by him on the *ex parte*application of plaintiffs, before the time-had expired for which the restraining order had-been granted!. The defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss the-appeal, on the ground that the order was not one from which an appeal lies to the General Term.

The'25th Section of the Act organizing this Court, provides for an appeal to the General Term from the decision, of a single Judge, and-those eases only, where, if the decision» complained of had been rendered- by the Circuit Court, an. appeal would lie from that tribunal to the Supreme Court* It is a general rule of practice that an appeal does not lie from an inferior- to the Supreme Court, except from a final judgment of such inferior court. The only exceptions to-this rule are made- by the statute*

Among those excepted eases is an interlocutory order,, “granting, or dissolving, or overruling motions to dissolve an injunction *intern?,*and *granting*an injunction, *in vacation^'**602 G. & H., 277, Sec. 576. It seems to me a clear proposition, >that this appeal does not come within the above exceptions to the general rule, that an appeal lie only .from a final /judgment.

The restraining order was noPan injustice, consequently 'the defendant could not have appealed from that order, vide *Cincinnati & Chicago R. R. Co.*v. *Huncheon and another,*16 Ind., 436.

The order dissolving the restraining order was not appeal-able for two reasons: *First,*it was nut the-dissolution of *an injunction,*for no injunction had been granted. *Second,*The «order was not made *'in term,*but in vacation.

The case does not come within any exception laid down an the statute, and we’ have no power to legislate to .cover .■such cases.

The defendant’s motion is therefore well taken, and the Appeal must be dismissed.
# Sitemap

## April 17, 1980

- Home
- Sitemap
- 1980
- 04
- April 17, 1980

            - Pivot of AD-1 Wings
# Sitemap

## April 19, 2011

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2011
- 04
- April 19, 2011

            - NASA’s Hubble Celebrates 21st Anniversary with ‘Rose’ of Galaxies
            - NASA’S Hubble Celebrates 21st Anniversary With “Rose” Of Galaxies
            - NASA Sets Launch Date For Space Shuttle Endeavour Mission
            - Hurricane Earl: The Astronaut View
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc., as subservicer, Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
  
  
 
 /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSE LUIS PEREZ.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 4.413

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 177489 dated October 02, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone communication services in the allocared lelecommunications network

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 02, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 02, 2019 No. 589-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
585 A.2d 371

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN IANNACONE.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.