alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,948
<SECURITIES>                                     5,534
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,200
<INVENTORY>                                        502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,017
<PP&E>                                          21,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,692
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,571
<SALES>                                         11,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,542
<CGS>                                            1,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE A. GAINES.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35784) and Amendment No. 607 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 9, 2021, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2021, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 10, 2021
# Sitemap

## October 29, 2012

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2012
- 10
- October 29, 2012

            - Dragon in its Nest
            - Amendment 20 Due Dates delayed for Appendix C.19 MatISSE, D.9 Astro
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00528-CV

IN RE VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION; Valero Refining-New Orleans, LLC; Valero 

Refining-Texas, L.P.; Valero Services, Inc.; Valero Unit Investments, LLC; Valero Retail 

Holdings, Inc.; Valero International Holdings, Inc.; and Valero Refining and Marketing Co.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 18, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to 

the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-04253, styled Judith Albarran, et al. v. Koch Specialty Plant 

Services, et al., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery 

presiding.
NO. 12-14-00141-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES JASON WHITE, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Following a guilty plea, 

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to imprisonment for thirty years. 

In a criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is 

imposed or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a). Appellant’s sentence was imposed on January 13, 2014, and he did not file a motion for 

new trial. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed no later than February 12, 

2014. However, Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until May 30, 2014. Because 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed on or before February 12, 2014, it was untimely, and 

this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.

On June 2, 2014, this court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure 37.1 and 42.3, that his notice of appeal was untimely and there was no timely motion 

for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. 

Appellant was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before June 12, 

2014, the information in this appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. That 

deadline has passed, and Appellant has not shown the jurisdiction of this court.
2

Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as 

provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered June 25, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 25, 2014

NO. 12-14-00141-CR

JAMES JASON WHITE,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007-1131-13)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ Michael StaranMichael StaranChief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2008
 /s/ Jarett Fenton

Jarett FentonChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2008
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR HUERTA-CARILLO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73724 

Agency No. A092-474-925 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022**

Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and GLEASON,*** District 

Judge.

Julio Huerta-Carillo petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals 

(“BIA”) decision denying his motion for sua sponte reopening based on a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Sharon L. Gleason, Chief United States District Judge 

for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

FILED

FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

fundamental change in the law. We generally lack jurisdiction to review the denial 

of a sua sponte motion for reopening. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th 

Cir. 2002). However, we retain jurisdiction “for the limited purpose of reviewing 

the reasoning behind the decision[] for legal or constitutional error.” Bonilla v. 

Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny Huerta-Carillo’s petition.

1. The BIA’s denial of Huerta-Carillo’s motion for sua sponte reopening 

did not rest on a legal or constitutional error. The BIA found that, even assuming 

there was a fundamental change in the law, the time between the change and the 

filing of Huerta-Carillo’s motion was too long to justify reopening. In its analysis,

the BIA examined the time that had elapsed in prior cases of sua sponte reopening,

and determined that Huerta-Carillo’s fourteen-month delay did not warrant 

reopening.

In reaching this decision, the BIA did not “misconstrue[] the parameters of its 

sua sponte authority[.]” See Lona v. Barr, 958 F.3d 1225, 1237 (9th Cir. 2020). 

Instead, the BIA exercised its discretion by reaching a decision based on the length 

of time that Huerta-Carillo waited to bring his claim. When the BIA does so, “there 

is nothing left for us to review.” Id. at 1235 (simplified). Because the BIA did not 

commit any legal or constitutional error in determining that Huerta-Carillo waited 

too long to bring his claim, we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of his motion 

for sua sponte reopening. Cf. Bonilla, 840 F.3d at 581–82. 
3 

DENIED.
THEA~TORNEY GENERAL 

OFTEX~~ 

'I*ILL WILSON 

AlTORNEY GICNERAI. 

July 15, 1958 

Colonel Homer Garrison, Jr. Opinion No. WW 476 

Director 

Texas Department of Public Safety Re: Jurisdiction of 

5805 N. Lamar Blvd. road Commission - 

Railand 

Aust.lri, 'l'exas Department of Public 

Safety over Motor 

Carrier and Motor Bus 

Operations Between Contiguous Incorporated 

Dear Colonel Garrison: Cities. 

Your request for a clarification of Attorney 

General's Opinion No. ~~-328, which related to the Railroad 

Commission's jurisdiction over motor carrier and motor bus 

operations over the Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike, and in which 

you request our opinion on the following questions: 

1. 

2. 

Is Art. 1690b, Vernon's Penal Code, vlolated by 

an uncertificated carrier hauling for hire who 

traverses a highway between incorporated cities 

or towns when the operation remains totally 

within corporate limits so that at no time Is 

the vehicle upon a highway in an unincorporated 

area? 

Is your answer to No. 1 above the same for the 

Dallas-Fort Worth TurnpIke as it is for other 

highways of Texas? 

has been received. 

In Opinion w-328, we distinguished between motor 

carrier operations and motor bus operations, and we held 

that any motor carrier transporting property for hlre over 

the highways of this State between or through two or more 

incorporated cities was subject to regulation. 

While Opinion No. ww-328 was in answer to questions concerning operations over the Fort Worth-Dallas Turnpike, the conclusions of law set forth in such Opinion would 
Colonel Homer Garrison, Jr., page 2 (WW-476) 

to other highways in the State of Texas, and 

we are OS tne opinion that there is nothing in the Motor 

Carrier Act, Article glib, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 

as amended, which gives effect to the doctrine of contiguous municipalities so as to exeinpt from regulation a carrier 

operating over the highways from one city.to another, even 

though such carrier at no time operates over a highway 

outside of the incorporated limits of incorporated cities 

and towns. 

be applicable ^ . 

All inter-city motor carrier operations over the 

public highways of this State are subject to regulation by 

the Railroad Commission of Texas. 

SUMMARY 

1. Article 1690b, Vernon's Penal Code, is violated by an uncertlficated carrier hauling 

for hire who traverses a highway between incorporated cities or towns, even though the operation remains totally within corporate limits, 

so that at no time lathe vehicle upon a highway in an unincorporated area. 

2. Our answer to No.1 above is the same for the 

Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike as it is for other 

highways iii Texas. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney Gener 

orney General 

Assistant Attorney General 
r 

_ .- 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COSIMITTEE: 

Geo. P. Blnckburn, Chairman 

Ralph Rash 

&lley Eugene Fletcher 

W.O. Schulz II 

REVILG'ED FOR THX ATTORNEY (XENERAI, 

BY: 

W.V. Ceppert
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: S.A.M., A MINOR

PETITION OF: R.M., JR., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 606 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Officer’s Certificate**

 

 

Pursuant to the requirementsof the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Servicer,the undersigned, Ellen D. Miller, as Managing Director and Head of Servicing ofBerkeley Point Capital LLC, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listedon Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in her capacity as anofficer and not in her individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made undermy supervision; and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 22nd day of February, 2017.

 

 

Berkeley Point Capital LLC

 

/s/ Ellen D. Miller

Ellen D. Miller

Managing Director, Head of Servicing

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

Multifamily Pass-ThroughCertificates, Berkeley Point Capital LLC as ***Sub-Servicer***:

 

Series 2009-K4

Series 2010-K5

Series 2011-K10

Series 2011-K12

Series 2012-K709

Series 2012-KF01

Series 2013-K24

Series 2013-KF02

Series 2014-KF03

Series 2014-K503

Series 2014-KF06

Series 2015-KF07

Series 2015-KF08

Series 2015-KF09

Series 2015-KF10

Series 2015-KF12

Series 2016-KF13

Series 2016-KF16

Series 2016-KSW1

Series 2016-KF18

Series 2016-KF26

 

 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

COMM 2014-CCRE17 MortgageTrust

COMM 2014-CCRE19 MortgageTrust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2014-GC24

COMM 2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2015-CCRE23 MortgageTrust

COMM 2015-CCRE27 MortgageTrust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2015-GC30

COMM 2015-HULA

COMM 2015-LC19 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2015-LC21 Mortgage Trust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2015-GS1

CCRESG 2016 HEAT MortgageTrust

Citigroup 2016-C3 MortgageTrust

CFCRE 2016-C7 Mortgage Trust
# Sitemap

## January 24, 2003

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2003
- 01
- January 24, 2003

            - Significant Event Report for Week Ending 1/24/2003
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES BENNETT.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Sitemap

## July 11, 2008

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2008
- 07
- July 11, 2008

            - Suiting Up
#### ROOSEVELT JONES v. HATFIELD WIRE & CABLE DIVISION AND COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, ETC.

March 24, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              7,978
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     113,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (5,348)
<INVENTORY>                                        29,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  151,272
<PP&E>                                            375,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (58,690)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    667,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              99,837
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              152
<OTHER-SE>                                        286,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      667,970
<SALES>                                           457,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  457,123
<CGS>                                             317,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     317,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   79,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  9,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    50,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                       20,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                30,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       30,312
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.93


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 7, 2010, National Center for Natural Products Research—NIDA MProject, University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Lab Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute on Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than December 20, 2010. Dated: October 8, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-26450 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# Sitemap

## January 17, 2017

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2017
- 01
- January 17, 2017

            - Mars Rover’s Mastcam View of Possible Mud Cracks
            - Possible Mud Cracks Preserved in Martian Rock
            - Successful Deep Space Maneuver for NASA’s OSIRIS-REx Spacecraft
            - NASA Hosts Facebook Live to Mark Success, Future of New Horizons Mission
            - NASA Astronaut Shane Kimbrough on Jan. 13 Spacewalk
            - Iowa Students to Speak to NASA Astronaut on the International Space Station
            - Norman Kuring – Making the Unseen Ocean Visible
            - SAGE III to Look Back at Earth’s Atmospheric ‘Sunscreen’
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN F. MILLER.

November 21, 1986.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MALCOLM BROWN.

April 28, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
# Mississippi Valley Division News Releases

Mississippi Valley Division News Releases RSS Feed

- Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District, to receive $1.2B in FY22 through Infrastructure Funding Law The U.S. Army has announced the Civil Works studies, projects and programs that the Corps would implement in Fiscal Year 2022 with the $22.81 billion in supplemental funding provided in two recently enacted laws — the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; and the 2022 Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act.
- Fargo-Moorhead diversion project receives $437 million in  Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act plan ST. PAUL, Minn. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, received $437 million to complete work on the Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Flood Risk Management Project in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, or IIJA, Plan released today.
- Army Civil Works Studies, Projects and Programs to Be Accomplished with Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding The U.S. Army announced today the Civil Works studies, projects and programs that the Corps would implement in Fiscal Year 2022 with the $22.81 billion in supplemental funding provided in two recently enacted laws — the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; and the 2022 Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act.