alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEO Stations and Contact 

Information: 

• Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology

Center Attn: Dave Leverknight, 412-386-6357, 

leverknight.david@dol.gov

• Madisonville KY Mine Rescue Station

Attn: Nathan Mounts, 270-821-9339, 

mounts.nathan@dol.gov

Attn: Kenny Garrett, 270-821-9504, 

garrett.kenneth@dol.gov

• National Mine Health and Safety Academy

Attn: Joey Wolford, 304-256-3331, 

wolford.joey@dol.gov

Attn: Shane McPherson, 304-256-3198,

mcpherson.bobby.s@dol.gov

• Denver CO Federal Center

Attn: VACANT

• Price UT MSHA Field Office 

Attn: Russ Bloomer, 385-707-8671, 

bloomer.russell@dol.gov

Attn: Thomas Barrington, 385-707-8672, 

barrington.thomas@dol.gov

 

Mine Rescue Team Training:

MSHA’s Underground Communication & 

Tracking System

MSHA Technical Support – Mine Emergency Operations 

The Mine Emergency Operations (MEO) Division of MSHA Technical Support is providing training 

opportunities to all Mine Rescue Teams. The training showcases the features, setup and operation of MSHA’s 

Underground Communication and Tracking System (UCS). This training is intended to familiarize mine 

rescue personnel with the deployment and utilization of the system during a mine emergency. MSHA 

believes providing the Nation’s Mine Rescue Teams with a fundamental knowledge of this system will 

enhance Emergency Preparedness by facilitating effective, rapid deployments of underground 

communication equipment.

Participation is voluntary and the training can be scheduled to coincide with your regularly scheduled practice and 

tailored to fit your allotted timeframes. The initial training for team members covers basic system component setup and 

system functionality with opportunities for “hands-on” interaction with the system. Advanced training is also available 

and covers the more technically advanced capabilities of the system. A full, underground deployment of the system can 

be incorporated into either training.

Please contact the MEO station nearest you with questions or to schedule a training exercise.

Training Opportunity

 UCS Basic System Components
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 4, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-606

Lower Tribunal No. 17-18681

________________

Michelle Pimienta,

Appellant,

vs.

David Abraham Rosenfeld,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna 

Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.

Michelle Pimienta, in proper person.

Nancy A. Hass, P.A., and Nancy A. Hass (Fort Lauderdale), for 

appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

LOBREE, J.

Michelle Pimienta (the “mother”) appeals from an amended final 
2

judgment of paternity. After a three-day trial during which the mother 

voluntarily absented herself, the trial court awarded the father, David 

Rosenfeld, the entirety of timesharing with the parties’ minor son as well as 

ultimate decision-making authority, in accordance with the recommendation 

of the guardian ad litem. Fourteen days before trial, the mother moved for a 

continuance based upon the fact a psychological report had yet to be 

completed. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the 

mother’s motion for continuance, even in light of the withdrawal of the 

mother’s tenth attorney shortly before trial, as our review of the record shows 

that the delay in completing the report was solely attributable to the mother. 

See Hogan v. Aloia, 257 So. 3d 479, 482-83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018); Cargile–

Schrage v. Schrage, 908 So. 2d 528, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Finding no 

error in the numerous other issues raised by the mother, we affirm the trial 

court’s commendably detailed and thorough order.

Affirmed.
# FY 20 MSPB_RawDataExport
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Review of R01s.                     

*Date:*                         October 26, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hungyi Shau, Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1030,                         *Hungyi.Shau@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26026 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### TOMANQUI KIRK v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL.

November 10, 1986.

Petition for certification granted. (See 212 *N.J.Super.*201)
# Holland appointed to Mississippi River Commission

President Trump appoints MG Holland as MRC President

**VICKSBURG, Miss.** – President Donald J. Trump recently appointed Major General Diana M. Holland as a member and as the 41st President of the Mississippi River Commission (MRC). Maj. Gen. Holland is the first woman to serve as the Commission President in its long and storied history.

Maj. Gen. Holland assumed command of the Mississippi Valley Division (MVD), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), on June 30, 2020. Maj. Gen. Holland serves as the senior military officer in the division, headquartered in Vicksburg, Miss., responsible for water resources engineering solutions in a 370,000-square-mile area, extending from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico and encompassing portions of 12 states. The mission of the division is to serve the Mississippi Valley region by providing vital public engineering services and stewardship of water resource infrastructure, partnering in peace and war, to strengthen our nation’s security, energize the economy and reduce risks from disasters. District offices located in St. Paul, Minn.; Rock Island, Ill; St. Louis, Mo.; Memphis, Tenn.; Vicksburg, Miss.; and New Orleans, La., carry out the division’s work.

Maj. Gen. Holland is a native of Santa Barbara, Calif. She graduated from the United States Military Academy and received a commission as a Second Lieutenant in the Corps of Engineers in 1990. She earned a Master of Arts degree at Duke University and a Master of Military Arts and Sciences degree from the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College and the School of Advanced Military Studies at Fort Leavenworth, KS.

The Commission, created by an Act of Congress on June 28, 1879, plans and provides for the general improvement of the Mississippi River. This includes improving navigation, preventing destructive floods and facilitating commerce. The presidential appointees consist of three officers from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a representative from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. 

The general duties of the commission include recommending policy and work programs, studying and reporting on modifications or changes to the Mississippi River and Tributaries project, commenting on matters authorized by law, making inspection trips, and holding public hearings that facilitate exchanges of viewpoints and ideas between the public and the MRC. Since 1879, the commission has been “listening, inspecting and partnering” with water resource interests in a watershed that is influenced by the drainage of more than 41 percent of the United States and two provinces of Canada.

www.mvd.usace.army.mil/mrc

 

-end-

**Contact**

Release no. 20-139

Mississippi  River Commission

MRC

MRC President
#### DIANA MELVILLE JOHNSON FIRESTONE AND JOHN SEWARD JOHNSON, JR. v. ALBERT W. MERCK, RAYMOND BATEMAN AND WILLIAM DYKEMAN.

November 2, 1987.

Petitions for certification denied.
#### JOHN A. MADDEN v. H.O.H., INC., T/A CARLTON HOUSE.

February 27, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
Exhibit 4.416

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 178740 dated November 18, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until November 18, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated November 18, 2019 No. 673-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
1214 Elgin Street | Houston | Texas | 77004 | tel. 713.522.7400 | fax 713.522.7410 | www.TexasLegalMalpractice.com

May 16, 2018

Via Electronic Filing

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street, Suite 245 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re: Court of Appeals Number 14-17-00379-CV; Alejandro L. Padua and 

The Padua Law Firm, PLLC v. Jason A. Gibson, PC d/b/a The 

Gibson Law Firm and Jason A. Gibson; In the Fourteenth Court of 

Appeals. 

Dear Mr. Prine,

Please be advised that Lance Christopher Kassab of The Kassab Law Firm will be 

presenting oral argument on behalf of Appellants Alejandro L. Padua and The Padua Law Firm, 

PLLC. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely,

THE KASSAB LAW FIRM

David Eric Kassab

CC. – All Counsel of Record (via electronic service). 

ACCEPTED

14-17-00379-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/16/2018 3:45 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/16/2018 3:45:43 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RODNEY SEASE.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2022
ROBERT MATERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KATHERYNE E. STOKES, Area Director, EEOCNorfolk Area Office; BOB SIEZER, EEO Coordinator, Commonwealth of Virginia/Corrections Department, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. H enry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-985) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Materson, Appellant Pro Se. Lamont Navarro White, UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C.;Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Materson v. Stokes , No. CA-95-985 (E.D. Va. June 22, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BENJAMIN MCBRIDE.

March 10, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 13,817.

#### Waymire *v.*Lank.

*Evidence.*— Motion *to Strike Out.*— It is not error to overrule a motion to strike out evidence where part of the evidence embraced in the motion is competent.

Special *Verdict.*— Finding.—Material *Facts.*— Judgment.—The party having the burden can not have judgment unless the special verdict finds all the facts essential to a recovery.

*Same.*— -Form of.— *Venire de Novo.*— Practice.—In the absence of a motion for a *venire de novo, ór*a motion to remand the case to the jury, no question is presented as to the form of the verdict.

From the Warren Circuit Court.

*W. B. Durborow,*for appellant.

*J. McCabe*and *E. F. McCabe,*for appellee.

Elliott, C. J.

— This action was prosecuted by the appellant against the appellee to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution.

*2Filed Nov. 7, 1889.

It is claimed by appellant that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to strike out the testimony of Thomas Clarkson. Much, if not all, of the testimony was clearly competent, and as the motion was addressed to the entire body of the testimony there was no error in overruling it. Counsel must select the incompetent evidence and direct, their motion against it, and not against the valid and competent evidence. The duty of separating the bad from the good rests upon counsel, and not upon the court. *Jones*v. *State,*118 Ind. 39, and authorities cited.

The appellant had the burden of the issue, and if the special verdict fails, as his counsel asserts, to state all the material facts the judgment was rightly entered in favor of the defendant. The party having the burden can not have judgment unless the special verdict finds all the facts essential to a recovery.

There was no motion for a *venire de novo,*nor any motion to remand the case to the jury, and consequently no question is presented as to the form of the verdict.

The verdict can not be disturbed upon the ground that it is not supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.
# Sitemap

## November 01, 2003

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2003
- 11
- November 01, 2003

            - Red Aurora Lights Up Maryland Sky
# Sitemap

## May 09, 2018

- Home
- Sitemap
- 2018
- 05
- May 09, 2018

            - Ash from Kilauea Eruption Viewed by NASA’s MISR
            - Jupiter’s Dynamic Atmosphere
            - Dream Chaser Departs NASA Armstrong
            - Dream Chaser Departs NASA Armstrong
            - Dream Chaser Departs NASA Armstrong
            - This Week in NASA History: STS-125 Launches on Final Hubble Servicing Mission – May 11, 2009
            - From Dynamos to Transits: Stellar Activity in an Exoplanet Context
            - DLR Chair Ehrenfreund and NASA Administrator Bridenstine Meeting
            - Powers Appointed NASA Press Secretary
            - NASA Awards Grants for Research into Life in Universe
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDOLPH SANDERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Iowa; Amendment No. 10 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
July 29, 2010.

    Monroe County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-26057 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 350)**

I, Chad Steelberg, certify that: 

 
1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritone, Inc.; and 
 
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 
 
Date: April 27, 2018  */s/ Chad Steelberg*  Chad Steelberg  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board  (Principal Executive Officer)
 
**
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Summary Calendar

No. 02-60624

 

STEPHEN MICHAEL COMBS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES HOLMAN, Etc.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

NORRIS W. KENNEDY, Officially and Individually,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(00-CV-36)

--------------------

March 14, 2003

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellee Stephen Michael Combs’ motion to dismiss

Norris W. Kennedy’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED. we

have jurisdiction of “appeals from all final decisions of the

district courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “[A] district court’s denial

of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an

issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ within the meaning
of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 notwithstanding the absence of a final

judgment.” Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985). The

rationale of the Supreme Court in extending the collateral order

doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949) to appeals from denials of qualified immunity was that the

“entitlement is an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to

liability” and would be “effectively lost if a case [was]

erroneously permitted to go to trial.” Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526

(italics in original). Mitchell was an appeal from a denial of

qualified immunity raised in a motion for summary judgment. A

district court’s denial of summary judgment on the issue of

qualified immunity “conclusively determines the defendant’s claim

of right not to stand trial” and that is the basis for the court’s

decision to allow an immediate appeal. Id. at 527 (italics in

original).

That rationale does not apply in this case. Kennedy could

have appealed the district court’s denial of summary judgment in

its order of July 18, 2001, but he did not do so. He seeks to

appeal now, after a trial on liability, but before the second stage

of these bifurcated proceedings, in which the district court will

determine, not liability for damages, which has already been

decided against Kennedy, but the amount of damages. “An order that

determines the issue of liability but leaves unresolved the

assessment of damages is not final within the meaning of section
1291.” Southern Travel Club v. Carnival Air Lines, Inc., 986 F.2d

125, 129-30 (5th Cir. 1993).

The policy of the final judgment rule against piecemeal and

duplicative litigation, as embodied in 28 U.S.C. § 1291, is

offended by Kennedy’s attempted appeal in this case. Matter of

U.S. Abatement Corp., 39 F.3d 563, 567 (5th Cir. 1994). Kennedy’s

arguments can be considered and reviewed in an appeal from any

final judgment that follows the district court’s assessment of

damages.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.