alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, SPOTRIAS.                    

*Date:*                         December 15, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard D. Crosland, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529. 301-496-0635.                         *Rc218u@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 13, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-26321 Filed 10-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 35.4



LOGO

2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among Morgan Stanley
Capital I, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Citibank, N.A. as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association as Custodian and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, relating to Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2014-C17 (MSBAM 2014-C17)

The undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and
if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  | Date: March 1, 2017
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of November 13, 2010, Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date of the November 13, 2010, meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission. 

# DATES:

                        The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on Saturday, November 13, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The                               ( print page 65030)                            Commission will meet jointly with the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force.                     

*Location:*                         The meeting will be held at the Somerset County Courthouse, Court Room #1, located at 111 E. Union Street, Somerset, PA 15501.                     

## Agenda 

The November 13, 2010, joint Commission and Task Force meeting will consist of: 

1. Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance. 

2. Review and Approval of Commission Minutes from August 7, 2010. 

3. Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and National Park Service. 

4. Old Business. 

5. New Business. 

6. Public Comments. 

7. Closing Remarks. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. 814.443.4557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. Address all statements to: Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. 

Dated: September 28, 2010.

Joanne M. Hanley,

Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.

[FR Doc. 2010-26462 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Thomas J. WILSON, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Georgetown Galleries, Inc., and Huntington Chair Corporation, Appellee, v. HY-LAN FURNITURE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant. In the Matter of GEORGETOWN GALLERIES, INC. and Huntington Chair Corporation, Bankrupts.

No. 9314.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 13, 1964.

Decided April 20, 1964.

Edward J. Brady, New York City (Hale, Hynes & Brady, New York City, on brief) for appellant.

Thomas J. Wilson, Lincolnton, N. C., and W. F. Womble, Winston-Salem, N. C., for appellee.

Before BOREMAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Hy-Lan Furniture Company, Incorporated, asserts that it was not afforded an *285adequate opportunity to present proof of its claim in this bankruptcy proceeding. The District Court determined that two letters written January 2, 1963 by Hy-Lan to the Referee constituted proof of claim. The issue of Hy-Lan’s opportunity to furnish further proof primarily raises a question of fact.

Consideration of the record, briefs and argument persuades us that the District Judge properly affirmed the order of the Referee disallowing Hy-Lan’s claim in part. The District Judge did not abuse his discretion by denying Hy-Lan’s motion to vacate the Referee’s order and to reopen the proceedings for further proof.

Affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
	  Significant Cases
      
    Search & Site Index Significant Cases
Interlocutory Appeal in the Matter of:

Barbara R. King v. Department of the Air Force, MSPB Docket Number DA-0752-09-0604-P-1
	Federal Register Notices
	78 FR 17233 Notice to file Amicus briefs in King v. Air Force (3/20/2013)  
	Relevant Documents
	
	
Agency Response to Amicus Briefs
(5/3/2013)  
Appellant Response to Amicus Briefs
(5/1/2013)  
Amicus Brief of Government Accountability Project and Whistlewatch.org
(4/12/2013)  
Amicus Brief of Jacques A. Durr, M.D
(4/12/2013)  
Amicus Brief of Thomas F. Day
(4/12/2013)  
Amicus Brief of the Department of Homeland Security
(4/12/2013)  
Amicus Brief of the National Whistleblower Center and Dr. Ram Chaturvedi
(4/12/2013)  
Amicus Brief of the Department of Veterans Affairs
(4/11/2013)  
Amicus Brief of MSPB Watch
(4/10/2013)  
Amicus Brief of Thomas C. Daniels
(3/25/2013)  
Order and Certification of Interlocutory Appeal
(3/6/2013)


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 00 78 -C V

______________________________ DESHARN WHI TE, MI CKEY GERAL D, J R., AN D A L LOT HE R O CCU PAN TS, Ap pe lla nts V. US BANK N ATI ONA LAS S OC I ATI ON T RU S TEE FOR THE HOL DER S OF MASRT ADJ USTABL E MORTGAGES TRUST

2007-HF 2 I

N A SECURI TI Z ATI ON, Appe llees
On Appea l from the County Court at L aw No. 5 Dallas County , Texas Trial Court No. CC-08-4295-L

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Me mor and

um O pin ion

by Chi e f Jus tic e Mo rr issThis appea l was transf err ed to this Court pursuant to the Texas S u preme Court's doc ket 1 e qu a lizatio n p ro g ra

m. 2

MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Desha rn White, Mickey

Ger ald, J r., and a ll other occupa nts of 1443 Driftwood L and, Ceda r Hill, Tex as, appe llants, filed their notice of appea l J une 12, 2008. 1 Appellants have not filed a docketing statement wit h this Court, nor have they paid a f iling fee or made any

claim of indig ency . SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 32
. Th e re is no thi ng in the reco rd to indicate a ppellants have made a

ny eff ort to h av e ei t her the cler k' s rec ord or r eporte r' s rec ord filed with this C ou rt , an d they have not f

iled a brie f. On August 25, 2008, we conta cted a ppellants by letter, g iving them a

n opportunity

to cure the var ious defec ts, and war ning the m that, if we did not
rec eive a n adequate response within ten day s, this appeal would be subje ct to dismiss al for w ant of prosec ution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c ). The letter addre ssed to appellan t M i ck ey Ger ald, J r., ca

me bac k as undeliver able, a nd we have rec eived no communication from the other a ppellants. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proc edure , we dismiss this appeal for w ant of prose cution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b).

J o s hR
. M o r r i s s , III Chief J ustice Date Submitted: September 18, 2008 Date D ecide d: September 19, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                         3,018,575
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  7,342,019
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                    7,198,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              18,347,840
<PP&E>                         4,882,390
<DEPRECIATION>                         0                   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                55,838,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         13,668,849
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          9,340,000
<PREFERRED>                       12,658
<COMMON>                          56,794
<OTHER-SE>                     2,125,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  55,838,729 
<SALES>                        6,789,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               6,789,207
<CGS>                          4,748,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  4,748,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               1,941,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               320,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (483,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (483,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0 
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                    (483,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.10)

</TABLE>
585 A.2d 349

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JESSE LOVELACE.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of NSTAR



|                                      |  |                      
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                      |  | State ofIncorporation
|NSTAR Electric Company                |  | Massachusetts        
|NSTAR Gas Company                     |  | Massachusetts        
|Hopkinton LNG Corp.                   |  | Massachusetts        
|Harbor Electric Energy Company        |  | Massachusetts        
|BEC Funding LLC                       |  | Delaware             
|BEC Funding II, LLC                   |  | Delaware             
|CEC Funding, LLC                      |  | Delaware             
|NSTAR Communications, Inc.            |  | Massachusetts        
|NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation      |  | Massachusetts        
|Advanced Energy Systems, Inc.         |  | Massachusetts        
|Medical Area Total Energy Plant, Inc. |  | Massachusetts        
|MATEP, LLC                            |  | Delaware
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jaisun Garcha, Chief Financial Officer of Snipp Interactive Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2017





/s/  Jaisun Garcha

Jaisun Garcha,

Chief Financial Officer
Opinion filed October 13 , 2011



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 11

- 00189

- C V

__________

RICKY DAVILA , SR., Appellant

V.

SYLVIA DAVILA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 3 2nd District Court

Mitchell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15,893

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed on June 9, 2010

. Appellant, Ricky

Davila

, Sr., timely filed a notice of appeal

. However, neither a clerk’s record nor a reporter’s

record has been filed

, and no filing fee has been paid

. We dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution.

The clerk of the trial court notified this court that appellant has neither filed a written
desig nation specifying the matt ers to be included in the clerk’ s record nor made arrangements to
pay for the clerk’s record

. Additionally, the court reporter notified this court that appellant has2

not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. On Aug ust 10, 2011, the clerk of this
court wrote appellant and requested that he forward proof that he has filed a designation of the

clerk’s record and made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and reporter’s record by
August 19, 2011

. In the letter of August 10, 2011

, the clerk also informed appellant that the
failure to provide the requested proof by the date indicated could result in the dismissal of this
appeal . Additionally, the clerk’s letter of August 10, 2011, informed appellant that the failure to
pay the required filing fee by August 19, 2011, could result in the dismissal of this appeal.
Appellant has not responded to the clerk’ s l etter of August 10

, 2011

. The failure to file the clerk’ s record and reporter’s record and to pay the required fi ling

fee appears to be due to appellant’ s acts and omissions. Therefore, pursuant to T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 37 .3(b) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

October 13 , 2011
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NAPOLEON GOODSON, IV, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-93-471, CA-00-1517-3-19) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Napoleon Goodson, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Napoleon Goodson, IV, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Goodson , Nos. CR-93-471; CA-00-1517-3-19 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 3, 2001 and Apr. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED