alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Federal Advisory Committee; Department of Defense Wage Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of closed meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
November 2, 16, and 30, 2010, in Rosslyn, VA.

DATES: The meetings will be held at 10 a.m. on November 2, 16, and 30, 
2010.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, 
Room A101, Rosslyn, VA 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of 
Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
4000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the 
meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the 
matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of 
the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered 
were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee 
that the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT) concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's 
attention.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-25568 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### ROBERT COLE v. CARTERET SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION.

October 13, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
April 4, 1988

No. 87-609.

#### Shell Oil Co. *v.*Director of Revenue of Missouri.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mo. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
08-14-00082-CR

ACCEPTED

08-14-00082-CR

EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS

EL PASO, TEXAS

8/24/2015 12:31:10 PM

DENISE PACHECO

CLERK

 FILED IN 8th COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 8/24/2015 12:31:10 PM DENISE PACHECO Clerk
585 A.2d 396

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALI FARD MUHAMMAD.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
858 A.2d 585

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Clyde Kevin MIDDLETON, Respondent.

No. 945 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 12, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2004, upon consideration of the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated June 11, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that CLYDE KEVIN MIDDLETON be subjected to PUBLIC CENSURE by the Supreme Court.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
585 A.2d 337

#### TO-FITNESS, INC., ETC. v. THE LEMPERT COMPANY, INC., ETC.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10868

Conference Calendar

 

RICHARD TERRANCE AYERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL.,

 Defendants,

STANLEY WILSON, Chaplain, Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Robertson Unit,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-100-BA

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Terrance Ayers, Texas prisoner No. 468361, appeals

the summary-judgment dismissal of his civil rights claims against

Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Chaplain Stanley

Wilson. Ayers argues that the summary-judgment evidence shows

that there are disputed material facts and that the district

court erred in concluding that Chaplain Wilson had no 
No. 97-10868

-2-

 

** The parties consented to proceed before the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

constitutional duty to help Ayers resolve his problems with the

TDCJ food service. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of

the parties, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons set forth by

the magistrate judge.**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service.<SUP>TM</SUP>

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Service gives notice of filing of a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 
U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

DATES: October 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that on October 4, 2010, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to 
Add Priority Mail Contract 28 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2011-2, CP2010-3.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-25607 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  C.E.  Rick
Strattan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13

(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ C.E. Rick Strattan
----------------------
C.E. Rick Strattan
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2004
585 A.2d 398

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD TROTTIER.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 382

#### ZENOP TUNCER v. WALTER AMBRUSTER.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 9

- 20330 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MELVIN MARQUISE STEWART , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 507

- 1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In accordance with an agreement that preserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress, Melvin Marquise Stewart pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. In the motion, Stewart moved to
suppress a firearm and ammunition found in the car he was driving, arguing that police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to detain him under the circumstances.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 31, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20330 Document: 00515293477 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2020No. 1 9

- 20330

2 When reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we review factual findings for clear error and the ultimate constit utionality of law enforcement’s action de novo

. See Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United States v. Pack , 612 F.3d 341, 347 (5th Cir. 2010 ). In addition to deferring to the district court’s factual findings made on the basis of live testimony , we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. United States v. Gibbs , 421 F.3d 352, 357 (5th Cir. 2005)

. T he totality of the circumstances , see United States v. Arvizu , 534 U.S. 266, 273 (2002) , surrounding the stop indicate that the officers had a

“ reasonable , articulable suspicion that criminal activity [ was ] underfoot ” when they stopped Stewart for questioning

. United States v. Jordan , 232 F.3d 447, 448 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Terry v. Ohio, 3 92 U.S. 1, 30 (1968)). Stewart was observed carrying a gun in a convenience store in a high crime area in the middle of the night. See United States v. Hill, 752 F.3d 1029, 1035 (5th Cir. 2014). In addition, the officers detected the smell of marijuana in the area of Stewart’s car, and the smell grew stronger as they approached the vehicle and he exited it. See United States v. Casteneda, 951 F.2d 44, 47

- 49 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the officers were justified in detaining Stewart and further inves tigating the gun and marijuana odor

. See Terry , 392 U.S. at 30. In light of this ruling, we do not address Stewart’s related argument that the gun and ammunition found in his car should be suppressed as the result of an illegal seizure

. AFFIRMED

. Case: 19-20330 Document: 00515293477 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/31/2020
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:        October 21, 1996
CONTACT:                      Wendy Yang
                              (505) 880-5321
 

                 TRENTON CANYON BEGINS LOADING HEAP LEACH ORE


ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO - SANTA FE PACIFIC GOLD CORPORATION (NYSE:GLD) announced
that the Lone Tree Complex began placing ore onto the heap leach pads at Trenton
Canyon on October 15, 1996. Trenton Canyon currently is mining material at a
rate of 30,000 tons per day at the North Peak deposit.

The leaching of the ore and completion of the carbon column recovery circuit is
scheduled for November 1996. The first gold production is expected in December
1996.

Trenton Canyon, located 11 miles south of the Lone Tree Mine near Valmy, Nevada,
is a conventional run-of-mine heap leach satellite operation of the Lone Tree
Complex. In addition to the North Peak deposit, two other deposits on private
and federal lands are proposed for open-pit development. Production from these
two other deposits requires approval of the Plan of Operations submitted to the
federal Bureau of Land Management in March 1996 and approval is expected in mid-
1998.

Patrick M. James, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Santa Fe
Pacific Gold, said, "Gold production at Trenton Canyon will begin slightly ahead
of the previously announced start-up in the first quarter 1997. The pieces are
falling into place for us to achieve our production growth targets in 1997 and
1998. Trenton Canyon is one piece of the total Lone Tree Complex, which includes
the Lone Tree Mine, Lone Tree Flotation Project and Mule Canyon."

Exploration at Trenton Canyon this year has consisted of drilling 140 holes to
better define certain areas of mineralization, extend mineralization and explore
new targets. A new zone of shallow oxide mineralization is being encountered in
the Valmy area. A second target, referred to as the Hollywood Zone, is also
under investigation and seven drill holes have intercepted a high-angle zone of
near surface oxide mineralization with grades between 0.03 and 0.13 ounce per
ton in intercepts 40 to 105 feet thick.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This news release contains
forward-looking information, which involves a degree of risk and uncertainty due
to various factors affecting the Company's business, including, but not limited
to, gold price volatility, ore grade and recovery rates, exploration results,
mining and processing conditions and costs, compliance with regulatory and
permitting requirements and the completion of project construction on schedule.

Santa Fe Pacific Gold is one of the largest gold mining companies in North
America with mines in Nevada and California and exploration offices and projects
throughout the world. The Company's shares are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol GLD.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MARQUISE HAYNES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D20-130 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Marquise Haynes, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000815

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

GABRIELLE LONGHI, CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT J. LONGHI REVOCABLE

TRUST DATED MAY 30, 1995, AS AMENDED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

MIMI HU and LEVIN & HU, LLP, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 17-1-0196(1))

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Chan and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack

appellate jurisdiction over this appeal by Plaintiff-Appellant

Gabrielle Longhi, Co-Trustee of the Robert J. Longhi Revocable

Trust Dated May 30, 1995, as Amended (Longhi), from the Honorable

Rhonda I.L. Loo's (1) October 21, 2019 order granting in part and

denying in part Defendants-Appellees Mimi Hu and Levin & Hu,

LLP's (the Hu Defendants) motion for sanctions and

disqualification of Longhi's counsel, the law firm of Bronster

Fujichaku Robbins (BFR), and (2) December 13, 2019 order awarding

attorneys fees and costs in favor of the Hu Defendants and

against BFR (collectively, the Sanctions Orders).

We lack appellate jurisdiction to review the Sanctions

Orders under the circumstance of this appeal, because the

aggrieved party, BFR, is not a named party, i.e., the appellant,

in the notice of appeal and the amended notice of appeal. See

Gold v. Harrison, 88 Hawai#i 94, 104, 962 P.2d 353, 363 (1998)

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000815

30-JUN-2020

09:17 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

("Accordingly, we hold that, on appeal, in a case where an

attorney has been sanctioned pursuant to HRCP Rule 11, the

attorney must be named as a party in the notice of appeal in

order for this court to have the jurisdiction to address the

circuit court's imposition of HRCP Rule 11 sanctions against the

attorney."); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Pacific Rent-All,

Inc., 90 Hawai#i 315, 321 n.4, 978 P.2d 753, 759 n.4 (1999)

("[B]ecause the award took the form of attorney sanctions, it

would have been improper to raise the issue here, unless the

attorney were named as a party in the notice of appeal.")

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellate court

case number CAAP-19-0000815 is dismissed for lack of appellate

jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 30, 2020.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 983 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 983

 To bar prosecution under section 844(f)(1) of title 18, United States 
                        Code, in certain cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

  Mr. Walden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To bar prosecution under section 844(f)(1) of title 18, United States 
                        Code, in certain cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Resource Management Practices 
Protection Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. BAR TO PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION 844(F)(1) OF TITLE 18, UNITED 
              STATES CODE, IN CERTAIN CASES.

    Section 844(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(f)(1)''; and
            (2) by adding after and below the end the following:
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if--
            ``(i) the damage or destruction, or attempt to damage or 
        destroy, is by means of a fire that--
                    ``(I) is set by a person to property owned by the 
                person--
                            ``(aa) to prevent an imminent threat of 
                        damage to that property; or
                            ``(bb) as part of any other generally 
                        accepted practice for managing vegetation on 
                        timber, grazing, or farm land;
                    ``(II) does not pose a serious threat of injury to 
                any individual or damage to any building, dwelling, or 
                vehicle of the United States; and
                    ``(III) does not result in death or serious bodily 
                injury to any individual; and
            ``(ii) an individual who has not attained 16 years of age 
        is not used in setting the fire.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7211]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2003 re-designation of the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) as foreign terrorist organization have changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation. Although the GIA no longer meets the criteria for designation as a foreign terrorist organization, its remnants and some senior leaders have joined al Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the Armed Islamic Group as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be revoked.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 28, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-26082 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kenneth Cole Productions,
                     Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
                     2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
                     hereof (the "Report"), I, Jill Granoff, Chief Executive Officer of
                     the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
                     pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                     of the Company. /s/ JILL GRANOFF Jill GranoffChief Executive OfficerKenneth Cole Productions, Inc November 8, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 12th day of January, 2007.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName:

Harley E Barnes IIITitle:

Chief Financial Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------