alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         November 12, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Camilla E. Day, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8837,                         *camilla.day@nih.gov.*

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25634 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
585 A.2d 337

#### SEYMOUR HASS v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF TAXATION.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00943-CR

IN RE James RUBIO, Relator

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 20, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator James Rubio filed a petition for writ of mandamus for this court to order the trial 

court to issue an order in his habeas proceeding. However, Rubio is not entitled to the relief he 

has requested. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(c); Ex parte Flowers, 665 S.W.3d 

575, 577 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022) (Slaughter, J., dissenting). 

Under article 11.07, section 3(c), “it shall be the duty of the convicting court to decide 

whether there are controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the 

applicant’s confinement.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(c); Ex parte Harrington, 

310 S.W.3d 452, 456 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). “If the convicting court decides that there are no 

such issues, the clerk shall immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of the 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1991-CR-6722-W2, styled Ex parte Rubio, pending in the 187th Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd presiding.
04-23-00943-CR

- 2 -

application, any answers filed, and a certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was made. 

Failure of the court to act within the allowed 20 days shall constitute such a finding.” TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Flowers, 665 S.W.3d at 577 n.4.

In this case, Rubio’s habeas application was forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 

who then dismissed the application without written order, citing the reason that Rubio’s sentence 

has been discharged. See Harrington, 310 S.W.3d at 456 (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. 

art. 11.07). The trial court has no further ministerial duty in this case. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.07; In re Williams, No. 13-12-00228-CR, 2012 WL 1255207, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Corpus Christi–Edinburg Apr. 12, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing 

Stearnes v. Clinton, 780 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)). 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
THOMAS MULLINS, CSR 

 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 

 COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 

 2100 Bloomdale Road, Suite 20364 

 McKinney, Texas 75071 

 (972) 548-3866 

 August 11, 2015 

Ms. Lisa Matz, Clerk 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas 

600 Commerce Street 

George Allen Courts Building 

Dallas, Texas 75202 

Re: Trial Court Case Number: 001-85822-2014 

 Appellate #05-15-00953-CR 

 Robert Earl Marzett vs. State of Texas 

Dear Ms. Matz: 

 I received notice today that the Reporter’s Record is due in the above styled and numbered 

cause. The Appellant appealed this case from the Municipal Court in Plano, Texas, which is a court 

of record, and this court ruled on it, and there was no Reporter’s Record made. 

 

 If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to let me know. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 /s/ Thomas Mullins 

 Thomas Mullins, CSR 

 Official Court Reporter 

 County Court At Law No. 1 

 Collin County, Texas 

 McKinney, Texas 75069 

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/11/2015 11:01:18 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Daniel de Boer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Smital Shah, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2016



|    |  |                    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/ Daniel de Boer
|    |  | Name:              |  | Daniel de Boer                                       
|    |  | Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/ Smital Shah   
|    |  | Name:              |  | Smital Shah                                          
|    |  | Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Financial Corporation(“Sterling”) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold B. Gilkey, Chief Executive Officer ofSterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: May 7, 2008  By:        /s/ Harold B. Gilkey    **Harold B. Gilkey**    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterlingand will be retained by Sterling and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission uponrequest.
E-4
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRIS LITTLE , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 682

[ August 13, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrew L. Siegel

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 08

- 010739CF10A, 10

- 007742CF10A, and 11

- 01166 1 CF10A

.
Chris Little, Jonesboro, Georgia , pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahasse e, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

L EVINE , C.J., G ROSS and K UNTZ , JJ, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TYRONE PEELE,

Petitioner

v.

MICHEAL OVERMYER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1156

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Bernard F. Daley of The Daley Law Office, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
        Public & Information Services

      Accessibility
   Contracting & Procurement
		  Extranet
		   Federal Register Notices
    FOIA Program
    Job & Internships
 	Press Releases & News
		   Regulations
    Technical SupportSearch & Site Index Federal Register Notices
	
	
docname
                Title
				Datedocname
  				Title
                Date


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
585 A.2d 339

#### BRIAN W. SPRAGUE v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 239 *N.J.Super.*197, 570 A.2d 1280)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                               1
<CASH>                                                                  341,925
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         1,002,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                           2,357,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      3,858,612
<PP&E>                                                                4,147,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       (3,197,360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        4,886,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 5,866,066
<BONDS>                                                                   7,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 3,699,649
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             49,778,298
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (54,880,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          4,886,668
<SALES>                                                               4,042,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      4,042,813
<CGS>                                                                 2,543,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         2,543,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        604,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       97,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          14,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      14,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             14,259
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (0.00)


</TABLE>
585 A.2d 364

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT W. MAC NEILL.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2016 of JIN WAN HONG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
(the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.



Very truly yours,



|/s/ Teng Fei Ma         | 
|----------------------- | 
|Teng Fei Ma             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Teng Fei Ma         | 
|Teng Fei Ma             | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|Dated: October 27, 2016 | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to JIN WAN HONG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SYLVESTER WEST.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

THOMAS F. DAY, 

Appellant, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY, 

Agency. 

DOCKET NUMBER 

DC-1221-12-0528-W-1 

DATE: January 16, 2013 

Thomas F. Day, Sterling, Virginia, pro se. 

Lorna J. Jerome, Washington, D.C., for the agency. 

Jason Zuckerman, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae 

Office of Special Counsel. 

ORDER 

The above referenced matter is before the Board on interlocutory appeal. 

On January 10, 2013, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) notified the Board that 

it would seek leave to file an amicus curiae brief in this appeal. OSC informed 

the Board that it was seeking “to offer its perspective on the important question 

of whether, based on the enactment of the provisions of the Whistleblower 

Protection Enhancement Act and its elimination of the Willis-Huffman disclosure 

criteria, [the] appellant has a right to pursue an [individual right of action] 

appeal.” OSC indicated that it would file a request for leave to file an amicus 

brief no later than January 25, 2013. 

“An amicus curiae is a person or organization who, although not a party to 

an appeal, gives advice or suggestions by filing a brief with the judge or the 

Board regarding an appeal.” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.34(e)(1). A person or organization 
 

2

may request permission to file an amicus brief. Id. Such a request “must include 

a statement of the person’s or organization’s interest in the appeal and how the 

brief will be relevant to the issues involved. 5 C.F.R. § 1201.34(e)(2). 

At this time, OSC has not yet filed a request to file an amicus brief that 

meets the requirements set forth at 5 C.F.R. § 1201.34(e)(2). However, in light 

of OSC’s clear interest and expertise with respect to whistleblower reprisal, we 

find it appropriate to invite OSC to file an amicus brief in this matter. See 

5 C.F.R. § 1201.34(e)(1) (the Board may solicit amicus briefs on its own motion). 

Accordingly, OSC may file a brief as amicus curiae in this appeal by 

February 15, 2013. OSC should file its brief with the Office of the Clerk of the 

Board and the Board, in turn, will serve OSC’s brief on the parties. Either party 

may file a response to OSC’s brief by March 8, 2013, must serve the response on 

OSC and the opposing party, and must provide proof of service to the Board. 

FOR THE BOARD: 

Washington, D.C. 

______________________________ 

William D. Spencer 

Clerk of the Board
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
|               | /s/ Vu Truong                                                               |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Vu Truong                                                                   |
| June 12, 2019 | Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             895
<SECURITIES>                                     4,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                       486
<INVENTORY>                                     11,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,932
<PP&E>                                          37,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,415
<BONDS>                                             41
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,176
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,295
<SALES>                                          9,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,329
<CGS>                                           10,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,694)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.68)


</TABLE>