alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  C RAIG A RTHUR H UMPHRIES ; W ENDY D AWN A BORN H UMPHRIES ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. C OUNTY OF L OS A NGELES ; L EROY B ACA , individually and in his No. 05-56467 official capacity as Los Angeles County Sheriff; M ICHAEL L. D.C. No. W ILSON , individually and in his CV-03-00697-JVS official capacity as a Detective Central District of



# 
and/or Deputy of the Los Angeles California, County Sheriff’s Department; Santa Ana C HARLES T. A NSBERRY , individually ORDER and in his official capacity as a Detective of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; B ILL L OCKYER , Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed May 26, 2011

Before: Jay S. Bybee and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills, Senior District Judge.*

*The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.

6901ORDER

After finding Appellants to be the prevailing parties in this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, we ordered Appellee County of Los Angeles to pay 10% of Appellants’ attorney’s fees. See No. 05-56467 (June 22, 2009) at 1, 3-4. We later adopted therecommendation of the Appellate Commissioner, which calculated this portion of the fee award to be $59,258.09. See No. 05-56467 (Dec. 2, 2009) at 2.

The United States Supreme Court subsequently reversed this portion of the judgment of this court. We likewise reverseand remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Los Angeles Cnty, Cal. v. Humphries , ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 447, 453-54 (2010). 6902 H UMPHRIES v. C OUNTY OF L OS A NGELES
585 A.2d 364

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL T. JOHAS.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487





Exhibit 4.1


 


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


December 6, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 545 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on December 3, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-259547) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# MSHA Stakeholder Conference Call

MSHA HeadquartersArlington, VA22202United States

January 18, 2022 01:37 pm

 

Please join the Mine Safety and Health Administration for our next Quarterly Stakeholder Call on Wednesday, September 29, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. ET.

Callers will be welcomed by Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Jeannette J. Galanis and agency safety and health specialists. The call will focus on Fatalities and a new campaign on roof/rib control.

Participants are invited to submit any questions they may have on the RSVP link below.

**Participants (Automated Entry)**Toll-Free (primary) 877-379-9317Toll (secondary, backup) 314-696-0509Conf ID: 9582416 Please RSVP for the call here by September 27, 2021.

If you have any questions about the upcoming call, please email askmsha@dol.gov or Monique Molina at molina.monique@dol.gov.

Quarterly Training Calls and Stakeholder Meetings Material
Document

NON-COMPETE AMENDMENT 


This NON-COMPETE AMENDMENT (this "Amendment"), is entered into between Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Fran Horowitz (the "Executive") as of the execution date by the Company below (the "Effective Date").


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an Agreement dated as of May 10, 2017 (the “Prior Agreement”) that sets forth the terms under which the Executive may be entitled to receive severance benefits upon the occurrence of certain events; 


WHEREAS, the non-competition provision of the Prior Agreement includes references to the Victoria’s Secret (“VS”) and Bath & Body Works (“BBW”) divisions of L Brands Inc., but the VS and BBW businesses have since become separate publicly traded companies, with L Brands Inc. no longer in existence; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to update the non-competition provision of the Prior Agreement to reflect the current status of the VS and BBW businesses; 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Executive’s continued employment, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:


1.Amendment to “Appendix A” as Referenced in Section 6(d) of the Prior Agreement:  Appendix A, as referenced in Section 6(d) of the Prior Agreement, is hereby replaced and updated as follows: 


						
	APPENDIX A
	(all current and future (as described in Section 6(d) of the Agreement) subsidiaries, divisions, and
affiliates of the entities below)
	American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.	Gap, Inc.
	J. Crew Group, Inc.	Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
	Urban Outfitters, Inc.	Aeropostale, Inc.
	Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation	Ascena Retail Group
	Lululemon Athletica, Inc.	Levi Strauss & Co.
	Victoria’s Secret & Co.	Express, Inc.
	Bath & Body Works, Inc.	Under Armour, Inc.
	Nike, Inc.	Amazon.com, Inc.










IN WITNESS HEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set their hand dated as of November 5, 2021.


			
	/s/ Fran Horowitz
	Fran Horowitz






IN WITNESS HEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set their hand dated as of November 5, 2021.


			
	/s/ Gregory J. Henchel
	Gregory J. Henchel
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	Abercrombie & Fitch Co.











Schedule to Exhibit 10.1 


The following executive officers of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. are each party to a Non-Compete Agreement with Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co. substantially identical to that entered into between Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co. and Fran Horowitz effective as of November 5, 2021.




															
	Name of Executive Officer		Date of Execution by Executive Officer		Date of Execution by Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co.
	Scott Lipesky		November 5, 2021		November 8, 2021
	Kristen Scott		November 5, 2021		November 8, 2021
	Gregory J. Henchel		November 6, 2021		November 9, 2021
	Samir Desai		November 7, 2021		November 8, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588; FRL-8850-8]


FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Cancellation of Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this notice to cancel a November 2-5, 
2010 meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 
(FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) to consider and review the 
Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic 
(PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk 
Evaluation System (CARES). The meeting was announced in the Federal 
Register of September 15, 2010; it will be rescheduled for early 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharlene Matten, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO), Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-0130; fax 
number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c5c9dcdccdc686dbc0c9dac4cdc6cde8cdd8c986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0cdc1d4d4c5ce8ed3c8c1d2ccc5cec5e0c5d0c18ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The November 2-5, 2010 meeting of the FIFRA 
SAP to consider and review the Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based 
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the 
Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System (CARES) has been 
cancelled. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register of 
September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56101) (FRL-8843-6). It will be rescheduled 
for early 2011. For further information, please contact the DFO listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

 List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: October 7, 2010.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25910 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HARLEY L. HURWITZ.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 936 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 936

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a space-available 
  transportation priority for veterans of the Armed Forces who have a 
        service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Vela) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a space-available 
  transportation priority for veterans of the Armed Forces who have a 
        service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Priority on Aircrafts and 
Coverage Equity Act of 2017'' or ``SPACE-A''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS 
              FOR DISABLED VETERANS WITH A SERVICE-CONNECTED, PERMANENT 
              DISABILITY RATED AS TOTAL.

    (a) Availability of Transportation.--Section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
        subsection (f):
    ``(f) Special Priority for Certain Disabled Veterans.--(1) The 
Secretary of Defense shall provide transportation on scheduled and 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a 
space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, 
permanent disability rated as total on the same basis as such 
transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(2) The transportation priority required by paragraph (1) for 
veterans described in such paragraph applies whether or not the 
Secretary establishes the travel program authorized by this section.
    ``(3) In this subsection, the terms `veteran' and `service-
connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 
38.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at 
the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3No. 333-225075) of Cadence Bancorporation and in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-217316) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Cadence Bancorporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan dated April 14, 2017, of our reports dated March 1, 2019, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Cadence Bancorporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cadence Bancorporation included this Annual Report (Form 10-K filed onMarch 1, 2019, as amended on March 8, 2019 and June 20, 2019) for the year ended December 31, 2018. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Birmingham, Alabama 

June 20, 2019 
**
#### Hector CAMPOS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 18, 2011.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Kimberly A. LaSure, Assistant Public Defender, Kissimmee, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case numbers 07-CF-002255, 07-CF-002613, 07-CF-002616, and 07-CF-002617, in the Circuit Court in and for *908Osceola County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION
                                      OF
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, C.E. RICK STRATTAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CTD HOLDINGS, INC.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):
a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2003

/s/ C.E. RICK STRATTAN
__________________________________________
C.E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
585 A.2d 338

#### BEVERLY REILLY v. GREGORY B. REILLY.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-15-2010

USA v. Luke Gatlin

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 09-2793

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Luke Gatlin" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 833.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/833
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

June 21, 2010

No. 09-2793

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 

 v. 

LUKE GATLIN,

 Appellant 

(D.C. DE. No. 06-cr-00028-001)

Present: RENDELL, AMBRO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

Motion by Appellee, United States Of America, to Designate Opinion dated 

June 15, 2010 as Precedential.

 /s/Maria L. Reyes 

Case Manager (267)299-4937

Attached is the Opinion dated 06/15/2010.

 O R D E R 

The foregoing Motion by Appellee to Designate Opinion as Precedential is granted. The

Court’s Not Precedential Opinion of June 15, 2010, is hereby vacated. A modified

Precedential Opinion will be filed forthwith. 

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: July 15, 2010
09-2793

USA v. Luke Gatlin

Page 2

DWB/cc:

 Seth M. Beausang, Esq.

 Ilana H. Eisenstein , Esq.

 Robert D. Goldberg, Esq.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services


Delegation of Authorities

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), or his or her 
successor, authorities vested in the Secretary under Section 6409(a) 
and (b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Public 
Law 111-148, as amended hereafter, relating to the development of a 
Medicare self-referral disclosure protocol and the reduction of amounts 
due and owing under Section 1877(g) [42 U.S.C. 1395nn(g)] of the Social 
Security Act.
    This delegation of authorities excludes the authority under Section 
6409(c) of ACA to submit a report to Congress on the implementation of 
Section 6409.
    This delegation of authorities granted herein may be re-delegated.
    These authorities shall be exercised under the Department's policy 
on regulations and the existing delegation of authority to approve and 
issue regulations.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Administrator, 
CMS, or his or her subordinates, which involved the exercise of the 
authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation of authorities granted herein is effective 
immediately.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3101.

    Dated: September 29, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25976 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
Exhibit 34.8



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

February 11, 2015



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201-2997
|T. (214) 999 1400, F. (214)754 7991, www.pwc.com/us