alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       Apr-01-1997                
<PERIOD-END>                         Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                 1,015,212
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            531,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              289,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,983,850
<PP&E>                                   294,501
<DEPRECIATION>                           151,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,366,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    457,614
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  41,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,852,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,366,561
<SALES>                                2,066,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       2,066,603
<CGS>                                    459,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            459,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,214,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (9,471)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          282,246
<INCOME-TAX>                              49,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      232,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             232,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .06
        

</TABLE>
{"agency":"MSPB","generated":"2020-04-23 12:08:36","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["MSPB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["36"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["33"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["53"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q2"}
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|January 12, 2007       
|                       
|/s/ Philip S. Chan     
|Philip S. Chan         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

d0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

146832(41)

GREENBROOKE PARKHOMES

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146832

COA: 305985

Oakland CC: 2011

- 116499

- CH

KATHY L. THOMAS,

Defendant,

and

MIDFIRST BANK,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

30, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Cory J. Reed, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 27,   2017 | By:    | */s/ Cory J. Reed*                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Cory J. Reed                                  |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
EX-10.19




 Exhibit 10.19 

Pear Therapeutics, Inc. 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy 

(As of December 3, 2021) 
 Director
Compensation 
 Non-employee members of the board of directors (the “Board”) of Pear
Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) shall be eligible to receive cash and equity compensation commencing on December 3, 2021, as set forth in this Non-Employee Director Compensation
Policy (this “Policy”). The cash and equity compensation described in this Policy shall be paid or be made, as applicable, automatically and without further action of the Board, to each member of the Board who is not an
employee of the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company (each, a “Non-Employee Director”) who may be eligible to receive such cash or equity compensation, unless such Non-Employee Director declines the receipt of such cash or equity compensation by written notice to the Company. This Policy shall remain in effect until it is revised or rescinded by further action of the Board.
The terms and conditions of this Policy shall supersede any prior cash or equity compensation arrangements between the Company and its Non-Employee Directors. 

Annual Cash Retainer 
 Each
non-employee director is entitled to receive cash compensation as described in the table below: 
  

					
	 Name
	  	Annual Retainer	 
	 Board of Directors
	  	$	 55,000	 
	 Audit Committee Chair
	  	 	20,000	 
	 Compensation Committee Chair
	  	 	15,000	 
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Chair
	  	 	10,000	 

 Equity-Based Compensation 

In addition to cash compensation, non-employee directors elected or appointed to our board of directors will be granted
a one-time stock option award to purchase 70,560 shares of our common stock on the date of such director’s election or appointment to the board of directors, which will vest in equal annual installments
over three years, subject to continued service through such vesting dates. On the day of our annual meeting of stockholders each year, we may grant each non-employee director an annual stock option or a
restricted stock unit award.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark A. Parkey, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of J. Alexander’s Holdings, Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: April 29, 2019 |   |                                                           |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                                           |
|                 |   | /s/ Mark A. Parkey                                             |
|                 |   | Mark A. Parkey

Executive Vice President, Chief                |
|                 |   | Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 23-50350

consolidated with

No. 23-50352

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Castaneda-Acevedo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. 4:21-CR-50-1, 4:23-CR-30-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Willett, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jose Castaneda-Acevedo appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal re-entry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), 

was well as the revocation of his term of supervised release related to a prior 

illegal re-entry conviction. Castaneda-Acevedo does not raise any issues in 

connection with the appeal of the revocation of his term of supervised release. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 16, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50350 Document: 00516932846 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2023
23-50350

c/w No. 23-50352

2

Rather, he argues for the first time on appeal that the recidivism 

enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a sentence 

above the otherwise-applicable statutory maximum established by § 1326(a), 

based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury 

beyond a reasonable doubt. While Castaneda-Acevedo acknowledges this 

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 

(1998), he nevertheless seeks to preserve it for possible Supreme Court 

review. In addition, Castaneda-Acevedo has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary disposition. 

This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions such as 

Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. 

Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Thus, Castaneda-Acevedo is

correct that his argument is foreclosed, and summary disposition is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969).

Castaneda-Acevedo’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgments are

AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-50350 Document: 00516932846 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2023
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128586 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, RONALD WARD, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128586 COA: 250174 Jackson CC: 03-001492-NH DR. SHARON ROONEY-GANDY, D.O., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order of the Jackson Circuit Co urt dismissing plaintif f's complaint with prejudice for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent.

K ELLY , J., would deny leave to appeal.

l1102 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 9, 2005

Clerk
Here's how you know.
 **Official websites use .gov**
        
        A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
        
        A **lock** (  ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 National Agricultural Library
                U.S. Department of Agriculture
        
                              Secondary Links
  

        
      Ask A QuestionContact UsDigiTopSite Search
Submit Search

                              menu

                                      Main menu

      
      HomeTopicsAnimal Health and WelfareEconomics, Business, and TradeFarms and Agricultural Production SystemsHuman Nutrition and Food SafetyNatural Resources, Conservation, and EnvironmentPlant Production and GardeningRural Development and CommunitiesAll TopicsResearch ToolsNAL Catalog (AGRICOLA)PubAgAg Data CommonsNAL ThesaurusFood Data CentralFood Safety Research Projects DatabaseManuscript Collections SearchAll Research ToolsCollectionsDigital CollectionsExhibitsSpecial CollectionsStories From the CollectionGovernment DocumentsAll CollectionsDataScientific Data ServicesData Management Planning ServicesCreate a DMPDMP Feedback and ReviewFind a Data RepositoryData Management GlossaryData Management VideosServicesPublic Access and Open Science at USDAData Management PlanningAg Data Commons User GuideDigiTopBorrow MaterialsReference and ResearchAll ServicesAbout UsAbout the LibraryEventsOrganization ChartInternshipsProgram AreasContact Us Home
          Exhibits
          Animal Welfare Act TimelineAnimal Welfare Act Timeline

  View a static version of this timelinePage Content Curated By
    

      Animal Welfare Information Center (AWIC)
 Footer menu
  

        
      HomeSitemapSocial MediaFacebookTwitterYouTube
          
          Government Links
            AskUSDA
  Policies and Links
  Plain Writing
  FOIA
  Accessibility Statement
  Privacy Policy
  Non-Discrimination Statement
  Civil Rights Policy
  Information Quality
  Agricultural Research Service
  USDA.gov
  USA.gov
  WhiteHouse.govSign up for ARS News updates
                Your email address
Order entered June 6, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 01416 - CR No. 05 - 17 - 01417 - CR BERRY RAY WILLIAMS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 16 - 60034 - 86 - F , 17 - 00260 - 86 - F



### O RDER By order entered on March 21, 2018, the Court granted appellant’s second motion to extend the time to file his brief. The Court’s orde r extended the due date for appellant’s brief to April 20, 2018. On April 25, 2018, the Clerk transmitted a notice to appellant informing him that the time for filing his brief had expired and directing him to file, within ten days, both the brief and an extension motion. To date, appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s notice, and he has not filed a brief. We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make a ppropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whetherappellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b). If the trial cou rt cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whic hever is earlier. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
584 A.2d 210

#### STEPHEN D’ONOFRIO v. JAMES J. CURRY, JR.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 4.375

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 172078 dated March 15, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

RIKT

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1034214000215

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4214004610

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Chekhova str., Mezhdurechensk, Kemerovo region, 652870

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until March 15, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated February 26, 2019 No. 111-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.A.Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00082-CR

BRIAN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11F0304-5

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brian Williams has filed several notices of appeal in connection with his pro se filings of 

pretrial habeas applications with the trial court. The trial is now complete, with his plea of guilty 

pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. On May 16, we sent a letter to Williams in connection 

with his attempted appeals, stating that there was no order or judgment appearing in the records 

from which an appeal could be taken, requesting that he show this Court how we could have 

jurisdiction over his appeals, and warning him that, in the absence of some such showing, his 

appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a).

Williams has filed a response in which he claims that the court denied his pretrial habeas 

applications on April 21, 2014. We have again reviewed the record and find no such order. 

Further, we have contacted the district clerk, who has informed us that no such order exists. 

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2014

Date Decided: June 5, 2014

Do Not Publish