alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

A15-0768 

Faep 

July 23, 2015 

OFFICE OF 

APPELLATE C TS 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

William Michael Sheahan, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 0288123. 

ORDER 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a 

petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent William Michael Sheahan has 

committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, assisting his 

client in the fraudulent transfer of assets during a lawsuit; failing to inform opposing 

counsel of an asset purchase agreement and its impact on his client's ability to honor a 

settlement agreement; making false statements in response to discovery requests and 

failing to produce information sought in discovery; manufacturing documents to falsify 

evidence payment made by his clients and producing them in discovery; and failing to 

provide information sought by the Director, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 

1.2(d), 3.1, 3.3(a)(1) and (3), 3.4(a) and (b), 4.1, 8.1, 8.4(c) and (d), and Rule 25, Rules 

on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). 

Respondent waives his rights under Rule 14, RLPR, unconditionally admits the 

allegations in the petition, and with the Director recommends that the appropriate 

discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 9 

months. 

1 
The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended 

disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Respondent William Michael Sheahan is indefinitely suspended from the 

practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order, with no right to 

petition for reinstatement for 9 months. 

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs 

pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. 

3. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), 

RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional 

responsibility portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal 

education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR. 

Dated: July 23, 2015 

BY THE COURT: 

Alan . age 

Associate Justice 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,790
<SECURITIES>                                   212,542
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               347,991
<PP&E>                                         116,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 504,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          285,973
<BONDS>                                         53,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   504,319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               573,474
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  577,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,783
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financialstatements.
</LEGEND>

 <S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                    8,200,631
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             5,381,128
<ALLOWANCES>                              27,222
<INVENTORY>                               1,291,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          15,108,965
<PP&E>                                    107,958
<DEPRECIATION>                            17,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            36,922,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     5,717,328
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  6,077
<OTHER-SE>                                31,199,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              36,922,756
<SALES>                                   7,170,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          7,170,581
<CGS>                                     7,112,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             7,112,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        32,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (481,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (481,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              (481,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.12)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JEFFREY TILLMAN,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, SCI HOUTZDALE, SCI 

SOMERSET, ALLEN G. JOSEPH, CCPM

LT. BROTHERS, BCI/PREA 

COORDINATOR,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 MAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated June 9, 

2017 at docket No. 327 MD 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: July 18, 2018

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2018, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, C.E. RICK STRATTAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CTD HOLDINGS, INC.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 11, 2004



/s/ C.E. Rick Strattan
___________________________________
C.E. Rick Strattan
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SYLVESTER CURRY.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO N IN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-21-0000383

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

PEAHI: DARLENE SPINNEY; KELIIHULUHULU: ALFRED SPINNEY,

KAMAKA-MAOLI, Petitioners-Appellants, v. EXTRA SPACE STORAGE, EXTRA SPACE STORAGE LP, ESS HOLDINGS BUSINESS TRUST I; GARY WELLMAN; LIZ FERNANDEZ;

MAILE MORESH; LARAINE CROOM; SPENCER F. KIRK; PETER SCOTT STUBBS; CHARLES L. ALLEN; JOSEPH MARGOLIS; KARL FRED SKOUSEN; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Respondents-Appellees

A PPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NORTH AND SOUTH KONA DIVISION ( CIVIL NO. 3DRC-21-0000708)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Fujise, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that:(1) On June 23, 2021, self-represented PetitionersAppellants Darlene Spinney and Alfred Spinney (the Spinneys) filed the notice of appeal without the fees required by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a);

(2) On August 6, 2021, the appellate clerk entered a notice of non-payment, instructing the Spinneys to pay the filing fee or seek a fee waiver on or before August 16, 2021, or the appeal could be dismissed;

(3) The record on appeal was due on or before August 23, 2021. See HRAP Rule 11(b)(1);

(4) On August 30, 2021, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing the Spinneys that the time to docket the appeal had expired, the Spinneys had not paid Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-21-0000383 17-SEP-2021 08:11 AM Dkt. 20 ODSDN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO N IN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### the filing fee or obtained an order allowing them to proceed on appeal i n forma pauperis , the matter would be brought to the court's attention on September 9, 2021, for action that may include dismissal of the appeal, and the Spinneys could seek relief from default by motion;

(5) The Spinneys took no further action in the appeal to address the default of the record on appeal; and

(6) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis . HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 17, 2021.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge /s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise Associate Judge

2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES D. WILLIAMS.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.28


 


AMENDMENT TO INX LIMITED SUBSCRIPTION
ESCROW AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (this “Amendment”) is entered into
March 11, 2020 by and between INX Limited (“INX”) and Metropolitan Commercial Bank (“Bank”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the parties have entered into that certain Subscription
Escrow Agreement (“Agreement”), executed as of January 7, 2020; and subsequently amended under Amendment #1 between
the parties dated January 15, 2020; and


 


WHEREAS, The parties have agreed that the Agreement is to be
revised as set forth herein.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants
set forth above and contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


 


Section 2(d) is revised in the first line
by changing the amount from “$5,000,000.00” to “$7,500,000.00”.


 


By executing this Amendment below, each
of the undersigned parties hereby certifies that it understands its contractual obligations and shall comply with them. The parties
agree that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, shall otherwise remain in full force and effect in accordance with its
terms, except as specifically amended herein, with effect from and including the date hereof. In the event of a conflict, ambiguity
or contradiction in terms, this Amendment shall control.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Program Manager and Bank have executed this
Amendment as of the date set forth above.


 





	INX Limited	 	Metropolitan Commercial Bank  (“Bank”)
	 	 	 
	By 	 /s/ Alan Silbert 	 	By 	/s/ Nick Rosenberg 
	Name & Title:   Alan Silbert, Director 	 	Name & Title:  Nick Rosenberg, EVP
	 	 	 
	 	 	By 	/s/ Michael A. Guarino 
	 	 	Name & Title:  Michael A. Guarino, EVP


 


Amendment,
Metropolitan Commercial Bank 1 | 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq
Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan                    
|Chiu M. Chan Chief
Executive Officer

January 11, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         14,599
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               83,370
<PP&E>                                         50,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,092
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,352
<OTHER-SE>                                     (49,874)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,570
<SALES>                                        33,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,899
<CGS>                                          14,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (82,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (82,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (82,449)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         436,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  948,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,967,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,505,072
<PP&E>                                       4,442,410
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,895,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,122,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,326,834
<BONDS>                                      2,301,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,943,230
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    46,477,065
<OTHER-SE>                                (50,460,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,122,838
<SALES>                                      2,604,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,604,408
<CGS>                                        2,361,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,361,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               661,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,183,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,183,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,183,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1244

SALLY K. FAVALORO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FLORENCE COUNTY; LUCAS JAMES ASPER; MICHAEL MONTGOMERY 

SHETTERLY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:21-cv-01698-JD)

Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 27, 2023

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sally Favaloro, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1244 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Sally K. Favaloro appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge, dismissing Favaloro’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice, and 

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Favaloro v. Florence Cnty., No. 4:21-

cv-01698-JD (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2022; Feb. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1244 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### NU M BER 13- 08- 0025 5-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG M ICH A EL R EEC E, A pp ellan t, v . NC O PO RT FOL IO M A NAGEM ENT , A pp ellee.

On ap pe al f rom th e C ou nty C ou rt atL aw N o. 3 of C ollin C ou nty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s Y añ ez, R od rigu ez, an d Be na v ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam The par ti es to t his appeal hav e fil ed an ag re ed moti on to v acat e the j udg ment of the tr ial cour t and remand th is matte r to t he tr ial co urt for further acti on c onsi ste nt w it h the ag re ement of the par

ti es. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a) (2 )(A)

.2

The Co urt, hav ing co n sid e re d the doc uments on fil e and the a g re ed moti on to vac ate a nd remand, i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he moti on s houl d be g ra nted. S e e id. The ag re ed moti on is GRAN TED. W e s et as ide the tr ial co urt’ s j udg ment w it hout re g ard to the meri ts and remand th e c ase to the tr ial cour t for re ndi ti on of j udg ment i n ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the par ti es. See i

d. ; T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.2(d). Costs w ill be ta x ed a gainst appel lan t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d) ( "Abse nt ag re ement of the par ti es, the cour

t w il l tax cos ts ag ain st the a ppel lan t.")

.

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 29th day

of Ma y , 200 8.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DBV Technologies S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre-Henri Benhamou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                                                      
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2016     
|                         
|/s/ Pierre-Henri Benhamou
|Name:                     |  | Pierre-Henri Benhamou                                
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)