Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices 63509 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers were engaged in employment 

related to the supply of pharmaceutical 

research and development services. 

The company reports that workers 

leased from Adecco Engineering and 

Technical were employed on-site at the 

Norwich, New York location of Warner 

Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The 

Department has determined that these 

workers were sufficiently under the 

control of the subject firm to be 

considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Adecco Engineering and Technical 

working on-site at the Norwich, New 

York location of Warner Chilcott 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–74,489 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Warner Chilcott 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., including on-site 

leased workers from Adecco Engineering and 

Technical, Norwich, New York, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after August 6, 2009, 

through September 10, 2012, and all workers 

in the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on the date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26017 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,933] 

Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard— 

Enterprise Business Services, 

Formerly Known as Electronic Data 

Systems, Including On-Site Leased 

Workers From Sun Microsystems, Inc., 

Dell Computer Corp., EMC Corp., EMC 

Corp. Total, Cisco Systems Capital 

Corporation, Microsoft Corp., 

Symantec Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare, 

Inc., Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc., 

ABM Business Machines, Inc., and 

Vision IT Pontiac, MI; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on January 25, 2010, 

applicable to workers of Hewlett 

Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise 

Business Services, formerly known as 

Electronic Data Systems, including onsite leased workers from the above listed 

firms, Pontiac, Michigan. The 

Department’s Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on March 5, 2010 (75 FR 10322). The 

notice was amended on July 13, 2010 to 

correct the impact date. The notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 26, 2010 (75 43555). 

At the request of the petitioners, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in activities related 

to information technology services. 

New information shows that workers 

leased from Vision IT were employed 

on-site at the Pontiac, Michigan location 

of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard— 

Enterprise Business Services, formerly 

known as Electronic Data Systems. The 

Department has determined that these 

workers were sufficiently under the 

control of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett 

Packard—Enterprise Business Services, 

formerly known as Electronic Data 

Systems to be considered leased 

workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Vision IT working on-site at the 

Pontiac, Michigan location of Hewlett 

Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise 

Business Services, formerly known as 

Electronic Data Systems. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers 

employed Hewlett Packard, Hewlett 

Packard—Enterprise Business Services, 

formerly known as Electronic Data 

Systems who were adversely affected by 

the acquisition of information 

technology services to India. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

amending this certification to properly 

reflect this matter. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–72,933 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett 

Packard—Enterprise—Services, formerly 

known as Electronic Data Systems, including 

on-site leased workers from Sun 

Microsystems, Inc., Dell Computers Corp., 

EMC Corp., EMC Corp. Total, Cisco Systems 

Capital Corp., Microsoft Corp., Symantec 

Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare, Inc., Sun 

Microsystems Federal, Inc., ABM Business 

Machines, Inc., Vision IT, Pontiac, Michigan, 

who became totally or partially separated 

from employment on or after June 25, 2008, 

through January 25, 2012, and all workers in 

the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through January 25, 2012, are 

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 

under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of 

October 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26016 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of September 27, 2010 

through October 1, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

63510 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,874 ............... The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M Seating) ......................................... Memphis, TN .............................. April 6, 2009. 

73,877 ............... L.A. Najarian, Inc .............................................................................. Greene, NY ................................. March 29, 2009. 

74,020 ............... The Electric Materials Company, Subsidiary of United Stars .......... North East, PA ............................ April 12, 2009. 

74,349 ............... Belding Hausman, Inc., Weldon Mill, Leased Workers from Compensation Management.Emporia, VA ................................ June 28, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,621 ............... Thermo Fisher Hamilton, Subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific, 

Lab Works Stations Division.

Two Rivers, WI ........................... March 2, 2009. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices 63511 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,272 ............... Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Leased 

Workers of Advantage Technical, etc.

Mounds View, MN ...................... June 21, 2009. 

74,337 ............... Certegy Check Services, Inc., Fidelity National Payment Services, 

Leased Workers from Appleone.

West Valley City, UT .................. June 30, 2009. 

74,385 ............... Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap, Inc., Leased Worker from Modis, 

Inc.

Columbia, SC .............................. July 13, 2009. 

74,464 ............... BreconRidge Manufacturing Solutions, Sanmina-SCI Corporation, 

Leased Workers from Kelly Services and Penski.

Ogdensburg, NY ......................... July 29, 2009. 

74,467 ............... Zach System Corporation, Zach System SPA, Leased Workers of 

Turner Industries and Go.

La Porte, TX ............................... August 3, 2009. 

74,491 ............... Acme Electric, Actuant Corporation, Leased Workers From Mega 

Force Staffing.

Lumberton, NC ........................... August 15, 2010. 

74,504 ............... American Girl Brands, LLC, Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc ..................... Middleton, WI .............................. August 6, 2009. 

74,517 ............... Hotels.Com, An Expedia, Inc. Company, Latam ............................. Arlington, TX ............................... July 31, 2009. 

74,556 ............... Telair International, Incorporated, Nordisk Aviation Products Division.Simi Valley, CA ........................... July 20, 2009. 

74,567 ............... Janssen R&D and Janssen Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Divisions of J&J.Springhouse, PA ......................... August 24, 2009. 

74,580 ............... Fiskars Brands, Inc., Garden Division, On-Site Leased Workers of 

QTI.

Sauk City, WI .............................. August 31, 2009. 

74,580A ............. Fiskars Brands, Inc., School, Office and Craft Division, On-Site 

Leased Workers of Manpower.

Wausau, WI ................................ August 31, 2009. 

74,585 ............... Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC ............................................... Grenada, MS .............................. August 26, 2009. 

74,606 ............... Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Danbury 

Pharmacal, Leased Workers Adecco Staffing.

Carmel, NY ................................. September 3, 2009. 

74,621 ............... Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Company, Inc., Leased Workers 

from Selectremedy and Manpower.

Claremore, OK ............................ September 10, 2009. 

74,657 ............... STMicroelectronics, Inc .................................................................... Phoenix, AZ ................................ October 31, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,947 ............... Supreme Foam, Inc .......................................................................... Archdale, NC .............................. November 17, 2008. 

74,425 ............... Douglas Corporation, Leased Workers Masterson Personnel, Just 

in Case, etc.

Eden Prairie, MN ........................ July 22, 2009. 

74,471 ............... Alumax Service Center, Division of SAPA Extrusions, Leased 

Workers of Manpower Temporary.

Riverside, MO ............................. July 15, 2009. 

74,592 ............... Interstate Electronics Corp., L–3 Communications, Leased Workers of Bently Global Resources, etc.Anaheim, CA ............................... August 31, 2009. 

74,600 ............... Lear Corporation .............................................................................. Louisville, KY .............................. September 3, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,569 ............... Titus Transportation, LP ................................................................... Denton, TX .................................. August 24, 2009 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,846 ............... AT&T Operations, Inc., Network Management Center .................... Boulder, CO.

74,191 ............... Pennsylvania Railcar—Plant #2, dba Railcar Services Company ... West Middlesex, PA.

74,506 ............... Acxiom CDC Corporation ................................................................. Chicago, IL.

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

63512 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,564 ............... Ally Financial Incorporated, Motor Acceptance Corp. (GMAC), 

Auctioneering Unit, Darlington Auto Auction.

Darlington, SC.

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,765 ............... Mount Vernon Consulting, LLC, Workers’ Wages Were Reported 

Under 14 W. Administrative Services, Agora, Inc.

Baltimore, MD.

73,395 ............... Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR, Inc. .................................................... San Angelo, TX.

73,972 ............... Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Patient Accounting Dept., 

Leased Workers, Liberty and Tritech.

Ocean Port, NJ.

74,040 ............... Cemex Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, Wampum Cement 

Plant.

Wampum, PA.

74,136 ............... Parker Paint Company ..................................................................... Beaverton, OR.

74,320 ............... United Steelworkers Local 746L ...................................................... Tyler, TX.

74,528 ............... United Auto Workers Local 2166, UAW .......................................... Shreveport, LA.

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,248 ............... EDS, an HP Company (Re-Branded as HP—Enterprise Services), 

Virtual Workers Across the United States.

Palo Alto, CA.

74,343 ............... JohnsonDiversey .............................................................................. Santa Cruz, CA.

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,603 ............... Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc., Field Service Engineers ..................... Wilmington, MA.

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of September 

27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. 

Copies of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. 

These determinations also are available 

on the Department’s Web site at 

http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 

the searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: October 8, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26014 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than October 25, 2010. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, at the address 

shown below, not later than October 25, 

2010. 

Copies of these petitions may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES