alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,456,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,990,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,947,701
<PP&E>                                       4,399,680
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,082,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,335,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,076,316
<BONDS>                                      2,334,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,372,953
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    47,630,061
<OTHER-SE>                                (51,588,818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,335,373
<SALES>                                      1,475,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,004
<CGS>                                        1,318,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,318,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               538,612
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,128,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,128,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,128,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
JIMMIE L. MONGO

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1011

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Jimmie L. Mongo, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahasse e , for Appellee.

PER CUR IAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL WILLIAM EVERETT.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification granted and the matter is remanded to the sentencing court for its consideration of whether a revision in sentence is warranted on the basis that when defendant was originally sentenced, the court's possible misapprehension that defendant was previously charged with the distribution rather than possession of a controlled dangerous substance was a material factor in defendant’s sentence; and it is further

ORDERED that the sentencing court may consider this matter on the submission of papers by the parties or conduct a hearing or otherwise as it may direct; and it is further

ORDERED that the sentencing court shall enter an appropriate order including its reasons for any revision to defendant’s sentence or, if the court determines that no revision is warranted, its reasons thereto.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Express Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Service gives notice of filing of a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 
U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

DATES: October 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that on October 4, 2010, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to 
Add Express Mail Contract 9 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2011-1, CP2011-2.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-25605 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Trillium
Therapeutics Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2016, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James Parsons, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|/s/ James Parsons       | 
|----------------------- | 
|James Parsons           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|March 10, 2017          | 

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




e-Appeal Logoe-Appeal Information Hub
	Access e-Appeal
	  FAQ
	   Information Sheets (Updated)
	  Notice Regarding Updating Contact InformationExtension of Deadlines
	  e-Filing Regulations
	   Policies
	  	   User Guides
	 

	   Technical Support Form

	  Search & Site Index e-Filing Policies
	
MSPB e-Appeal Policy on Agency Initial Contacts


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2132

MARIO GALIANO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DONALD R. GUILLORY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-701-AM)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Galiano, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Galiano seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Galiano v. Guillory, No. CA-98-701-AM

(E.D. Va. July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To: the Supervisory Board and Shareholders of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-199451) and Form F-3 (No. 333-207245) of our reportdated March 31, 2016 relating to the consolidated financial statements of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

/s/Deloitte Accountants B.V. 

Amsterdam, the Netherlands 

March 31, 2016
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

Policy on Prohibited Conduct

The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board) is committed to promoting a safe 

and productive work environment for its personnel and the people it serves so that it may carry 

out its mission to “Protect the Merit System Principles and promote an effective Federal 

workforce free of Prohibited Personnel Practices.” While parties to an appeal and other MSPB 

stakeholders may disagree strongly with each other and/or MSPB personnel during the appeal 

process or through interactions regarding MSPB’s jurisdiction and processes, no individual is 

permitted to abuse the Board’s adjudicatory process or personnel. 

Unacceptable conduct includes: 

1. Physically or verbally assaulting parties, witnesses, or Board personnel;

2. Harming or threatening harm (in person, over the telephone, by mail, by fax, or in 

electronic communications) to parties, witnesses, Board personnel or Board offices;

3. Engaging in harassing, abusive, disruptive, or contumacious conduct, including but 

not limited to the use of profanity or excessively persistent telephone, email, fax, or 

in-person communications, that impedes Board personnel from performing their duties;

4. Using disparaging language based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, 

sexual orientation, disability, marital status, and/or political affiliation; 

5. Recording conversations with Board personnel without the Board’s consent; and

6. Contacting or attempting to contact Board personnel at their personal addresses, 

telephone numbers, or emails, or through social media. 

Engaging in such prohibited conduct may result in the Board taking steps to protect its personnel 

and resources such as banning the offending individual from entering the Board’s offices, 

ceasing in-person, electronic or telephonic communications with the individual, and/or barring 

the individual from filing pleadings. In addition, the Board may impose sanctions as set forth in 

5 C.F.R. § 1201.43, or, as a last resort, terminate an appeal with prejudice. The Board may also 

report such prohibited conduct to Federal law enforcement for appropriate action. 

The Board will provide appropriate warnings to an offending individual and any representative, 

allow a response to the actual or proposed sanction when feasible, and document the reasons for 

any resulting sanction in the appeal record for pending matters and/or in separate written 

communications to the offending individual. In the event the Board imposes any limits on an 

individual as a result of prohibited conduct, the Board will provide information regarding 

whether the individual may request permission to file pleadings and/or communicate with MSPB 

in any pending or future case, and the method by which the individual may request 

such permission. 

January 2020
Exhibit 32.2

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that, to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to
be executed this 14th day of July, 2011.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName: Harley E Barnes IIITitle: Chief Financial Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD KELLY.

October 14, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 4.415

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 178568 dated February 16, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

local, international and intercity phone communication service

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until February 16, 2027.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated November 18, 2019 No. 673-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

BENJAMIN J. ROSCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. JAMES E. SCHOENBERGER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-2270 (D.C. No. CIV-93-682-M) (Dist. N.M.)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ reques t for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted wi thout oral argument. Mr. Benjamin J. Roscoe filed this pro se action in Metropolitan Court-2-

in Bernalillo County, New Mexico against a federal employee alleging defamation, interference with business, violation o f constitutional rights, and false accusation of crimes. Defendant removed the action to federal district court and filed a motion to dismiss for fa ilure to effect service, which the court granted. Mr. Roscoe appeals, and w e affirm. Where service of process is attempted prior to remo val of an action to federal court, state law determines whether service was valid. 4A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1082 (2d ed. 1987). Mr. Roscoe alleges that service was per fected under N.M. R. Civ. P. (Metro. Cts.) 3-202 (Michie 1995 Cum. Supp. ). Under Rule 3-202 (E) “[a] summons and complaint may be served upon adefendant . . . by mailing a copy . . . together with [an] acknowledge ment . . . . [However,] [i]f no acknowledgement . . . is received by the se nder . . . service . . . shall be made . . . in the manner prescribed by Paragraph F.” If service is made by mail, the returned acknowledgment must be filed with the court. N.M. R. Civ. P. (Metro Cts.) 3-202 (G). Although Mr. Roscoe alleged that he mailed a copy o f the complaint and summons to defendant, he did not file a returne d acknowledgment with the state court, nor did he attempt to perfect serv ice under Rule 3-202 (F). Accordingly, we agree with the district court that his action should be1We note that Mr. Roscoe has not attempted to perfect service under

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4, and we decline to consider facts an d issues he raises for the first time on appeal. See Oyler v. Allenbrand , 23 F.3d 292, 299 n.8 (10th Cir. 1994). -3- dismissed. 1
We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. The mandate sh all issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
#### Joel E. FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-2800.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Joel E. Figueroa, Bushnell, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the order denying Figueroa’s petition to file a belated 3.850 motion in case no. 2009-CA-34513, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-4-1999
<CASH>                                         897,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  739,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,311,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,031,000
<PP&E>                                     110,439,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,476,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,104,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,099,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,603,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,104,000
<SALES>                                     36,836,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,910,000
<CGS>                                       10,927,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,305,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,289,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             552,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,764,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,764,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
585 A.2d 337

#### BEEKMAN MANOR, INC., ETC. v. K.M.C. HOLDING CO., ETC., ET AL. AND THE KISLAK COMPANY, INC.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 10, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Philip S. Chan     
|Philip S. Chan         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.