alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS5Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer for theHarwood Center Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: November 4,2019

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                               EAGLE FINANCE CORP.

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
               For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1997 and 1996
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                                MARCH 31,
                                                           -------------------
                                                               1997     1996
                                                           ---------   -------
                                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Income data:
1.  Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . .   $ (1,508)  $  138
2.  Applicable income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         --       52
                                                            --------   ------
3.  Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   $ (1,508)  $   86
                                                            --------   ------
                                                            --------   ------

Number of outstanding shares:
4.  Weighted average common shares
     outstanding, adjusted for stock splits . . . . . . .      4,189    4,189
5.  Weighted average shares of treasury
     stock outstanding, adjusted for 
     stock splits   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         --       --
6.  Weighted average shares reserved for stock
     options (utilizing the treasury stock method)  . . .         --      115
7.  Common shares outstanding (Line 4-5+6)  . . . . . . .      4,189    4,304
        

Net income (loss) per share:
8.  Net income (loss) per common shares (Line 3/4)  . . .     ($0.36)   $0.02
9.  Fully diluted net income (loss) per common (Line 3/7).    ($0.36)   $0.02
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-CCRE19Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and Berkeley Point CapitalLLC, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: June 22, 2018

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
MICHELLE NEZOVICH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3435

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed October 14, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. T. Michael Jones , Judge

.

Michelle Nezovich, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(j); Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Charles S. Miller, Jr., United States Magistrate J udge for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3230

___________ Charles Bradford Odom, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Burleigh County Detention Center, * Unknown Head Supervisor; Detective * [UNPUBLISHED] Kenan Kaizer; Detective Paul Olson; * Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s * Attorney; Glen Valley, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 22, 2010 Filed: March 31, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. North Dakota inmate Charles Bradford Odom appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. Following de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915A-2- dismissal is reviewed de novo) , we have found no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,231,831
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         668,019
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,300,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,173,298
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      13,225,160
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,526,610
<LOANS>                                     77,117,639
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,113,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,016,553
<DEPOSITS>                                 112,675,075
<SHORT-TERM>                                   550,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,201,281
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,506,694
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,082,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             124,016,553
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,768,205
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              437,055
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,205,260
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             589,261
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             605,904
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,599,356
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   42,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,446,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                311,888
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     189,311
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   189,311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    884,694
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,069,535
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,828
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,177
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,113,884
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,113,884
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Conduct Stakeholder Session on WRDA 2018 Implementation Guidance

**Washington (February 1, 2019)** - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will conduct a Stakeholder Session, Monday, Feb. 11, to get public input on USACE development of implementation guidance for various provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (WRDA 2018).

WRDA 2018 was signed into law Oct. 23, 2018, as Title I of the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018.

USACE will also seek implementation guidance input for two provisions of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 and three provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 during the session.

The purpose of the Stakeholder Session is to enable stakeholders and the public to provide input on specific provisions requiring implementation guidance.  USACE encourages participants to share their thoughts and comments on any problems, challenges, impacts or other factors they see as being critical for consideration during the development of implementation guidance.

The Stakeholder Session will take place from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Eastern at the USACE headquarters in the Government Accountability Office building, 441 G Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20314.  Attendees must enter the H Street side of the building.

Due to security procedures for entering the GAO building, those interested in attending the Stakeholder Session in person must call ahead or email not later than 5 p.m., Wednesday, Feb. 6, to register to be placed on the access roster.  Attendees must present valid picture identification for entry to the building.

To register to attend in person please provide your name, title, organization and contact telephone number by one of the following means:- Email to:  WRDA2018@usace.army.mil.- Telephone: 202-761-0415.

The session will also be available by teleconference for those who cannot attend in person.  The teleconference may be joined five minutes prior to the scheduled 8 a.m. Eastern start time.  To participate by phone, dial (800) 288-8960.

All stakeholders, including those participating by phone, are welcome to provide oral comments during the session and will be selected to speak on a first-come, first-served basis.

USACE is currently accepting stakeholder comments on WRDA 2018 implementation guidance during the ongoing 60-day comment period that closes midnight, Feb. 12.  Information about how to submit comments can be found athttps://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Project-Planning/Legislative-Links/wrda_2018/.  

The list of provisions that the USACE is developing implementation guidance on can be found athttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Project-Planning/Legislative-Links/. 

For questions related to the Stakeholder Session, please contact Ms. Ada Benavides at 202-761-0415 or ada.benavides@usace.army.mil.

 

-30-

**Contact**

Release no. 19-002

WRRDA

2018

stakeholder session
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-2277

ARIEL MICHAEL PUNZALAN,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 5, 2009, is

amended as follows:

On page 9, line 15, "March 17, 2007" should be replaced with

"March 17, 2006"
585 A.2d 340

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS WANDS, JR.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle: President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 23, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP3 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the
manager of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. III (the
Partnership), certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the
period ended June 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Partnership. /s/ Patrick L. BeachPatrick L. BeachPresidentGP3 Asset Acquisition, LLCAugust 12, 2004
#### DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF NEW JERSEY, INC. v. JACK COLLINS.

December 21, 1987.

This matter having come before the Court on a grant of certification to *Rule*2:12-2(a);

And the Court having permitted parties in similar litigation to participate as *amici curiae,*having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and having heard the argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the cases of the *amici*and others present common questions of law on the application of the dual-office holding provisions of the New Jersey Constitution in differing factual settings;

And the Court being of the view that the interests of justice require that the determination in this case should also address and resolve the related cases in which the issue of dual-office holding has been raised;

And it appearing that the record established below is not adequate to permit an appropriate resolution of the matter;

And the Court having further determined that this matter should be remanded to the Superior Court, Láw Division, to permit the parties to develop a record that will enable the Court to decide the issues presented;

*522And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED:

1. The judgment of the Law Division is vacated to the end that the trial court shall be free to reinstate or revise its opinion and judgment at the conclusion of the proceedings provided for by this Order.

2. The matter is remanded to the trial court for further hearings consistent with this Order.

3. Pursuant to *Rule*4:38-1 and *Rule*1:1-2, *Nick Ballesteri v. David C. Schwartz,*Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, and *Frank B. Holman v. Gabriel M. Ambrosio,*Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Bergen County, are hereby consolidated with the within matter.

4. The trial court shall take testimony and hear legal argument and shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issues of whether the full-time employment held by the defendants in these consolidated actions constitutes a state office or position of profit within the meaning of Article IV, Section 5, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the *New Jersey Constitution of m?*and whether the provisions of Article IV, Section 5, Paragraphs 3 and 4, contemplate that any distinctions in eligibility to serve in the Legislature may be drawn based upon the relationship to the State of New Jersey of the employer, be it State university, State college, authority, or other agency.

5. The trial court shall consider any other relevant factual and legal issues not previously raised before this Court in the within litigation.

6. Pending the further Order of this Court, the implementation of the results of the November 3,1987, election shall not be enjoined or otherwise stayed.

7. Jurisdiction is otherwise retained.,
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CASIMIR GURSKY.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fotoball USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Favish,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael Favish
------------------------------------
Michael Favish
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fotoball USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas R. Hillebrandt,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas R. Hillebrandt
--------------------------------
Thomas R. Hillebrandt
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003