alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALENTINA ANDRANIKI

SARKSYAN; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70468

Agency Nos. A095-640-594

 A095-640-595

 A095-640-596

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Valentina Andraniki Sarksyan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, and

her children, natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying Sarksyan’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

FILED

OCT 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70468

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d

1012, 1015 (9th Cir. 2003), and deny the petition for review.

Sarksyan fears persecution from Armenian authorities based on her

husband’s activities with the Dashnaktsutyun political party. Substantial evidence

supports the agency’s conclusion that Sarksyan did not establish that she was or

would be persecuted on account of an actual or imputed political opinion. See INS

v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992) (to reverse the agency’s finding

“we must find that the evidence not only supports that conclusion, but compels it”)

(emphasis in original); Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1489-90 (9th Cir. 1997). 

Accordingly, Sarksyan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See

Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2005).

Petitioners’ opening brief does not raise any challenge to the agency’s denial

of CAT relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996)

(stating that issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1



RF MONOLITHICS, INC.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, David M. Kirk, Chief Executive Officer and President of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of July, 2004.



/s/ David M. KirkName:

David M. KirkTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and President




*A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.395

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 175253 dated October 01, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

cable radio services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 01, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated June 27, 2019 No. 364-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
#### ESTATE of Ernest R. ANDERSON, Deceased. Lawrence E. ANDERSON and Richard C. Anderson, Co-Administrators, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 78-1212.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 15, 1980.

Thomas P. Casey, Casey, Cavanaugh & O’Neill, Troy, Mich., for petitioners-appellants.

M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Michael L. Paup, David I.. *588Pincus, Helen A. Buckley, Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Stuart E. Seigel, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Before ENGEL and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judges, and FEIKENS,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable John Feikens, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Taxpayers appeal a decision of the United States Tax Court entered on January 17, 1978, upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency of $35,483.17 in federal estate tax against the estate of the decedent Ernest R. Anderson. The Commissioner claimed certain stock of the Anderson Music Company should be included in the gross estate of the decedent at its value at the time of Anderson’s death; appellants assert the stock was more properly valued at $650 per share, the sum established in a purchase agreement dated January 29, 1965, between the trustee of a revocable trust, which the decedent established on December 1, 1964, and the two sons of the decedent and an employee of Anderson Music Company.

After a rehearing, the Tax Court, in an opinion by Judge Theodore Tannenwald, Jr., dated July 26, 1977, P-H Memo TC, 177-237, held the evidence established that the revocation of the *inter vivos*trust terminated the February 1, 1965 buy/sell, agreement. Therefore, the agreement was not in effect at the decedent’s death and the stock was properly valued at its fair market value on the date of the decedent’s death.

Upon a careful review, the court is not persuaded that any Michigan law which the appellants cite compels a different result. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth by the Tax Court in its second opinion, filed July 26, 1977,

IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Tax Court be and it is hereby affirmed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00091-CV

GABRIELA N. ANDERSON, Appellant

V.

HILEY CARS HURST, LP, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Tarrant County (2019-004035-2)

June 27, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 4.369

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 164770 dated September 04, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

telecommunication services for Cable Broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

RIKT

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1034214000215

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4214004610

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Chekhova str., Mezhdurechensk, Kemerovo region, 652870

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 04, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 08, 2018 No. 287-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ O.А. Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL LANGFORD.

December 16, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                         803,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  705,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,287,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,222,000
<PP&E>                                      98,963,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,179,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,366,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,259,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,776,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,366,000
<SALES>                                    104,704,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           104,969,000
<CGS>                                       31,723,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,087,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,444,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,389,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,049,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,049,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,049,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


SBA North Florida District Advisory Council

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of open Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time, and agenda for the next meeting of the SBA North Florida District 
Advisory Council. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 16 from 11:30 a.m. 
to 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Sabore: 13005 SW 1st Rd; Suite 
129, Newberry, FL 32669.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meeting of the SBA North Florida District Advisory Council. The SBA 
North Florida District Advisory Council is tasked with providing advice 
and opinions to SBA regarding the effectiveness of and need for SBA 
programs, particularly within North Florida and for listening to what 
is currently happening in the Florida small business community.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss with the council the 
current status of small business across North Florida and to discuss 
the agency status especially in regards to the passing of the jobs 
bill. The agenda includes: An overview of the status of the SBA as an 
agency from Wilfredo J. Gonzalez, SBA District Director as well as a 
luncheon/meeting to hear from the members of the council and to hear 
from the SBA staff on SBA updates for the District.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
attend and/or make a presentation to the SBA North Florida District 
Advisory Council must contact Lola Kress by November 9th, 2010, by fax 
or email in order to be placed on the agenda. Lola Kress, Business 
Development Specialist, SBA North Florida District Office, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e8ebe8e5aaeff6e1f7f7c4f7e6e5aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b4744474a0540594e58586b58494a054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>, (904) 443-1933, fax (202) 481-4188.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Lola Kress, Business 
Development Specialist, SBA North Florida District Office, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f5f6f5f8b7f2ebfceaead9eafbf8b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7aba8aba6e9acb5a2b4b487b4a5a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>, (904) 443-1933.

Dan Jones,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26305 Filed 10-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### RICHARD DAMATO v. HENRY FREDA, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-3, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2015 and ending on February 29, 2016 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 20th day of May, 2016.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 2.2


                                    ADDENDUM
                                       TO
                      AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

         WHEREAS, September 8, 1999 Nutriceuticals.com Corporation, a Nevada
corporation ("Nutriceuticals") entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization with Dynamic Health Products, Inc., a Florida corporation
("Dynamic"), whereby Nutriceuticals agreed to purchase all of the outstanding
shares of capital stock of Becan Distributors, Inc., an Ohio corporation
("Becan") with the intent to consummate a tax free reorganization under Internal
Revenue Section 368(a)(2)(E) and Section 368(a)(1)(A). In order to carry out the
merger, Java Sports.com, Inc. , a recently formed corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of Nutriceuticals with no operations ("Java"), will consummate the
merger with Becan, a wholly owned subsidiary of Dynamic.

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of each of Dynamic, Java,
Nutriceuticals and Becan have approved and deems it advisable and in the best
interest of its respective shareholders to consummate the acquisition of Becan
by Nutriceuticals upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein:
and

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         Java will enter into a merger agreement with Becan whereby Java will
merge into Becan and Becan will continue as the surviving corporation. As a
result of the Merger, Becan will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
Nutriceuticals.

         This Addendum is dated as of September 8, 1999.

                                                NUTRICEUTICALS.COM CORPORATION


                                                By:      /s/ STEPHEN M. WATTERS
                                                         ----------------------
                                                Name:    Stephen M. Watters
                                                Title:   President


                                                DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.


                                                By:      /s/ KOTHA S. SEHARAM
                                                         ----------------------
                                                Name:    Kotha S. Seharam
                                                Title:   President
----

----

|   | (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert      B. Goergen                    |
|   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | December      7, 2009                     |

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of A. G.

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 01092

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 04829J

Trial court: 315th District Court of Harris County

On April 26, 2019, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court

to hold a hearing within 7 days to determine why appellant’s counsel had not filed a brief.

Appellant’s brief was filed on April 29, 2019.

Accordingly, the Court withdraw s the order of April 26, 2019. The appeal is reinstated on

the active docket. Appellee’s brief is due within 20 days of the date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Justice Peter Kelly

____  Acting individually  Act ing for the Court

Date: __ April 30, 2019

___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

HOWARD BRYAN )

also known as Paul Smith, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 13-0066 (KBJ)

)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 28, 2013, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 9]. The 

Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 

local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned that plaintiff that, if he 

did not respond to the motion by July 31, 2013, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. To 

date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time 

to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendant’s motion as conceded and dismiss this 

action. An Order is issued separately. 

/s/

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge

DATE: August 12, 2013