alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 7110** 

DOUGLAS G. WHITFIELD ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

OFFICER LEE; OFFICER STANCIL; LIEUTENANT SMITH ,
Defendants

- Appellees , and
DICK JENKINS, Sheriff; RANDLE SMITH, Lieutenant; DARREL LAND, Detective ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:10

- ct

- 03151

- D )

Submitted : November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Douglas G. Whitfield , Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winsto n
- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Douglas G. Whitfield appeals the district court ’ s

order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims

filed pursuant to 42 U. S.C. § 1983 (2006) . We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Whitfield v. Lee , No.

5:10

- ct

- 03151

- D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2012) . We dispense with oral
argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Washington, DC 20419

Dear Chairman Grundmann:

On November 8, 2013, the Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) issued a Federal Register

notice, 78 Fed. Reg. 67076, inviting public comment on four options the Board is considering fora revision ofits jurisdictional regulations codified in 5 C.F.R. 1201.56. The Board specified a

deadline of December 9, 2013 for the receipt of comments. Office of Personnel Management(OPM) hereby submits its comments.

Under 5 C.F.R. 1200.4(b), the Board has reserved for itselfthe option to engage in finalrulemalcing without notice and comment in certain circumstances. However, OPM urges theBoard in this case to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking inviting public comment on

whichever, if any, ofthe four options the Board selects, before the Board issues a final rule on its

standards of proof for appellate jurisdiction. We believe that it is important to provide interested

parties a full and fair opportunity to comment on the policy the Board actually expects to adopt

and on that policy’s underlying rationale. This will benefit the Board by allowing more focused

and detailed commentary before the final rule is adopted.

OPM has reviewed the Federal Register notice and the explanatory options paper published on

the Board’s Web site to facilitate review. We note that all of the options appear to preserve the

appellant’s burden of proof in retirement cases, consistent with the current regulations. Wesupport no change to these burdens of proof.

With respect to the four proposed options, our preference is for something like option B, whichsets forth in a straightforward way the burdens of proof applicable to various statutory appeal

rights. While option A, directing the Board’s presiding officials to notify parties ofthe specific

jurisdictional elements applicable to each case, appears to have the benefit of simplicity and

accurate notice, its omission of precise jurisdictional rules may result in inconsistent practice.

We believe that options C and D are unnecessarily complex, although they recognize — in a way

that options A and B do not — that additional jurisdictional pleading requirements may be a factor

when matters are made appealable to the Board by OPM regulation rather than by statute. Werecommend amending option A to reflect this concept.

OPM also believes that while it is appropriate for the Board to propose rules governing thecircumstances under which claims and defenses may be resolved without a full hearing on the

www.opm.gov Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People www.usajobs.gov
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the thoughtful options prepared by your regulatoryworking group.

Respectfully,

L L

Sharon M. McGowan

Acting General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2000 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         216,423
<SECURITIES>                                    56,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,385
<PP&E>                                           8,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,087)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,040
<BONDS>                                        196,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       176,657
<OTHER-SE>                                   (100,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,744
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DrugMax, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Patrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronald J. PatrickRonald J. PatrickChief Financial Officer,Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerSeptember 28, 2004
nymox_103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3
  
 December 3, 2021
  
 Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
 Bay & Deveaux Streets
 Nassau, The Bahamas
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen:
  
 Reference is hereby made to that certain sales agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of July 17, 2020, by and between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (“A.G.P.”). 
  
 The Company and A.G.P. hereby agree to amend the Agreement (the “Amendment”), as follows: 
  
 1. References in the Agreement to the “registration statement” are hereby amended to mean the shelf registration statement on Form F-3 filed by the Company on the date hereof, mutatis mutandis.
  
 2. References in the Agreement to the “date of this Agreement” are hereby amended to mean December 3, 2021, mutatis mutandis.
  
 3. Section 7(g)(ix) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read: (ix) the Company shall reimburse the Sales Agent for its reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses (including but not limited to the Sales Agent’s transaction costs and the reasonable and documented fees and expenses of counsel to the Sales Agent) in an amount not to exceed $15,000 (the “Sales Agent Expenses”) which Sales Agent Expenses shall be due and payable upon the filing by the Company of the ATM Prospectus pursuant to this Agreement, provided further that the Company shall reimburse the Sales Agent for its reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses related to annual maintenance of the Agreement (including but not limited to the Sales Agent’s transaction costs and the reasonable and documented fees and expenses of counsel to the Sales Agent) on an annual basis in an amount not to exceed $10,000 which shall be due and payable prior to each Representation Date following the filing of an annual report on Form 20-F.
  
 Except as expressly set forth above, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect after the execution of this Amendment. Defined terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.
  
 This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts and by facsimile or “.pdf” signature or otherwise, and each of such counterparts shall be deemed an original and all of such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
  
 [Signature page follows]
  
 	 
	
	

	 

  
 In acknowledgment that the foregoing correctly sets forth the understanding reached by A.G.P. and the Company, please sign in the space provided below, whereupon this Amendment shall constitute a binding agreement as of the date indicated above.
  
  
 	  
	 Very truly yours,
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 	 A.G.P./ALLIANCE GLOBAL PARTNERS
	
	 	 	 	 
		By:		
	  
	 Name:
		 
	 	 Title:
		 
	 	 	 	 
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	 Accepted and Agreed:
	  

	  
	  
	  

	  
	 NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	 By:
	  
	  

	  
	 Name: 
	  
	  

	  
	 Title:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
       Appeal Process
    Appellant Q&A
      Electronic Filing
      Forms
      Hearing Sites
		Mediation Appeals Program
	Policy & Resources
     		Regulations
		
     Whistleblower Q&ASearch and Site Index Changes to the U.S. Code
	 Congressional Research Service Summary of the Hatch Act Modernization Act of 2012The Hatch Act Modernization Act of 2012Congressional Research Service Summary of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
SCWC-14-0001086
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

RICHARD A. VILLAVER, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. DAVID KAWIKA SYLVA; HAWAII MEGA-COR, INC., a Hawaii domestic for-profit corporation, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001086; CIVIL NO. 10-1-2445) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Richard A. Villaver’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 22, 2018, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 12, 2018.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001086 12-MAR-2018 01:28 PM
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
	  Data
	    	 AI Inventory
   
    Search & Site Index Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Case Inventory

	Pursuant to Section 5 of Executive Order 13960, "Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government," and codified by the Advancing American AI Act, the Merit Systems Protection Board does not have any AI use cases as of May 15, 2023.


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                     WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV, L.P.,SERIES 4 
                              
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,706,703
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,706,703
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,077,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,012,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,077,179
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    41,899
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       38,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   234,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (231,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (231,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (231,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (20.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of its filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add Inbound Expedited Services 4 to the Competitive Product List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642.

# DATES:

October 14, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret M. Falwell, 703-292-3576.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, on September 30, 2010, a request to add Inbound Expedited Services 4 to the Competitive Product List. The bases for determining that this is a competitive product and that it satisfies the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 are included in the documents available in Docket Nos. MC2010-37 and CP2010-126 on the Postal Regulatory Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.prc.gov.*

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2010-25911 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
H. Res. 1167 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 3, 2018. 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives has learned 

with profound regret and sorrow of the death of George Herbert Walker Bush, forty-first President of the United States 

of America. 

Resolved, That the House tenders its deep sympathy to 

the members of the family of the former President in their 

bereavement. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy of the same to the family 

of the former President. 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the 

former President. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### DR. AL WALI D. MUHAMMAD v. ROBERT KEOWN.

October 26, 1987.

Leave to appeal granted, and the October 10, 1986, Order of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded for consideration of the appeal on the merits.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00280-CR

Style: Michael Wayne Starnes

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: August 23, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: May 1, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: August 26, 2013

Date Requested: September 25, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 25, 2013

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant appellant additional motions to 

extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant requests an extension of time to file his brief. We grant appellant’s motion and order

appellant’s brief be filed no later than September 25, 2013. 

Judge's signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 3, 2013