alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1012 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1012

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 24, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6199) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to include certain over-the-counter medical products as qualified medical 
expenses. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In 
lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 
on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-82 shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from July 27, 2018, 
through September 3, 2018--
            (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be 
        considered as approved; and
            (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at 
        a date and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of 
        the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the 
        adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
    Sec. 4.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a calendar day for purposes of section 7 of the 
War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1546).
    Sec. 5.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a legislative day for purposes of clause 7 of 
rule XIII.
    Sec. 6.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a calendar or legislative day for purposes of 
clause 7(c)(1) of rule XXII.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137976 

DONALD ANGLIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137976 

 COA: 287097 

WCAC: 07-000303 

DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Jacob Guise *v.*John Middleton.

DECEMBER TERM, 1843.

Where a decree of sale of property is made, it is generally left to counsel to designate the length of time and mode of publication of the sale; the Court taking care that the notice is reasonable and fair.

A decree cannot be amended after it is enrolled in a matter of materiality, unless the record exhibits something to amend by ; a mere clerical mistake, or miscalculation, may be amended at any time, when the mistake is apparent on the face of the decree or record.

Where decree by mistake, required certain property to be advertised for *six months*for sale, when it was intended to be advertised for only *six*weeks, and the decree had been enrolled, the Court refused to amend it.

Upon motion to amend the decree made in this case :

*W.*Yerger, for motion.

The amendment desired, is- to obtain a change in the length of time required by the decree for the publication of the property. The decree is an ordinary one ,for the sale of mortgaged premises, and counsel, in drafting the decree, (it was not drawn up by myself,) by inadvertence, inserted *six months,*instead of *six weeks,*the usual period. The mistake was not detected until after the decree was signed by your Honor. I have no interest in the case, and make the application at the request of Mr. Stewart, who is the counsel of record.

By the Chancellor. Has the decree been enrolled ?

Clerk. It has, sir.

Chancellor.

I have been in the habit of allowing counsel to designate the length of publication in decrees of this sort, without prescribing any limit, except to see that the notice be reasonable and fair. It is a matter in which the parties in interest have been left to their own discretion, except that the Court will not permit injustice to be done.

But, unless the minutes of the Court show something to correct *90the decree by, or the law affixes a positive limitation, the decree, after it has been enrolled, cannot be altered.

The rule is this : That any mere misprision of the clerk, or error in the calculation of principal or interest, apparent upon the face of the decree or' record, the Court will order, as a matter of course, to be amended, after enrolment, or .even after the term has elapsed. Such errors must be corrected, to preserve the consistency of the records, by which they must be regulated. Any error, not apparent of record, cannot be amended after enrollment.

The Court cannot, therefore, in a matter so material as the length of time for which the property must be advertised, where the minutes show nothing whatever to amend by, order the correction. Had I been prescribing, myself, the proper time for the publication to continue, I should probably not have exceeded one sixth the period now required by the decree ; but I have allowed counsel a discretion ; they have exercised it, it may be, improvidently ; but I cannot now alter it.

Let the motion be overruled.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information providedto me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, as Primary Servicer, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerfor the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the State Farm PortfolioMortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the StateFarm Portfolio Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 14, 2024

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       Apr-01-1997                
<PERIOD-END>                         Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                   871,317
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            628,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              226,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,899,251
<PP&E>                                 1,212,540
<DEPRECIATION>                           185,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,014,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    401,656
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  41,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,929,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,014,240
<SALES>                                3,174,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       3,174,654
<CGS>                                    694,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            694,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,947,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (11,676)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          419,313
<INCOME-TAX>                             100,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      318,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             318,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .08
        

</TABLE>
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.3



 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated December 14, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 547 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-260276) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 14, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588; FRL-8850-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Agency is issuing this notice to cancel a November 2-5, 2010 meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) to consider and review the Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System (CARES). The meeting was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 15, 2010; it will be rescheduled for early 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sharlene Matten, Designated Federal Official (DFO), Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001;                         *telephone number:*                         (202) 564-0130;                         *fax number:*                         (202) 564-8382;                         *e-mail address: matten.sharlene@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The November 2-5, 2010 meeting of the FIFRA SAP to consider and review the Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System (CARES) has been cancelled. The meeting was announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56101) (FRL-8843-6). It will be rescheduled for early 2011. For further information, please contact the DFO listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.**

#  List of Subjects

      - Environmental protection
      - Pesticides and pests

Dated: October 7, 2010.

Frank Sanders,

Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25910 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing will meet November 18-19, 2010, in Carmel, CA.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, November 18 (from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday, November 19, 2010 (from 8:30 a.m. to noon).

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Pine Inn, Ocean Avenue between Lincoln St. and Monte Verde St., Carmel, CA 91921.

      ( print page 63824)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*Committee's Designated Federal Officer or Point of Contact:*                         Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), Room 3D1066, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone (703) 697-9271.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Purpose of the Meeting

The purpose of the meeting is to review planned changes and progress in developing computerized and paper-and-pencil enlistment tests.

## Agenda

The agenda includes an overview of current enlistment test development timelines and planned research for the next 3 years.

## Public's Accessibility to the Meeting

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165, and the availability of space, this meeting is open to the public.

## Oral Presentations/Written Statements

                    Persons desiring to make oral presentations or submit written statements for consideration at the Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. Arabian (see                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    ) no later than November 10, 2010.                

Dated: October 13, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-26189 Filed 10-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No

. 18

- 11479

_____________________

CHAD EVERET BRACKEEN; JENNIFER KAY BRACKEEN; STATE OF

TEXAS; ALTAGRACIA SOCORRO HERNANDEZ; STATE OF INDIANA;

JASON CLIFFORD; FRANK NICHOLAS LIBRETTI; STATE OF

LOUISIANA; HEATHER LYNN LIBRETTI; DANIELLE CLIFFORD,

P laintiffs

- Appellees

v.

DAVID B ERNHARDT, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE

INTERIOR; TARA SWEENEY, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant

Secretary for Indian Affairs; BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

ALEX AZAR, In his offic ial capacity as Secretary of the United States

Department of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendants

- Appellants

CHEROKEE NATION; ONEIDA NATION; QUINAULT INDIAN NATION;

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS,

Intervenor Defendants

- Appellants

__________________________

Appeal s from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

_______________ ___________

ON PETITION S FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 9 , 2019

, Modified August 16, 2019,

5 Cir., 201 9

, 9 3 7 F.3d 4 09 ) United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

November 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

ClerkNo. 18

- 11479

Be fore OWEN , Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS,

ELROD

, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON

, COSTA

, WILLETT, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. 1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active

service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a

briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

1 Judge Ho is recused and did not participate in this decision

.

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50956

Summary Calendar

 

KENNETH STENHOLM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CV-369

- - - - - - - - - -

July 14, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Stenholm appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of his application for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. He argues that

substantial evidence did not exist to support the finding that he

was not disabled. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MIQUEL ANGEL CONCEPCION.

November 9, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.