alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOB HYPOLITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-98-159, CA-00-3495-4-22)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Job Hypolite, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* While we have not determined precisely when the limitations

period begins and ends for claims based on Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have determined that Apprendi claims may

not be raised initially on collateral review. See United States v.

Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 144, 151 (4th Cir. 2001).

2

PER CURIAM:

Job Hypolite seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning

of the district court.* United States v. Hypolite, Nos. CR-98-159;

CA-00-3495-4-22 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[AC 187-1D]


Schedule of Charges Outside the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the 
availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 187-1D which transmits an 
updated schedule of charges for services of FAA Flight Standards 
Aviation Safety Inspectors outside the United States. The advisory 
circular has been updated in accordance with the procedures listed in 
14 CFR part 187, Appendix A.

DATES: This AC is effective on October 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A copy of this publication may be 
downloaded from: http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC%20187-1D.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tish Thompkins-Imafidon, Flight 
Standards Service, AFS-50, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 385-
8097.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 29, 2010.
Raymond Towels,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-26322 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Edward C. Milligan, Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                 
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ EDWARD C. MILLIGAN          
|                     |  |     |  | Edward C. Milligan, Chairman and
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
MSHA Impact Inspection List

(October 2023)

Mine Information x Type of Issuance x S&S Information x Issuances - Type of Action x Justifications

District State

Coal/

MNM Mine ID Controller Name Operator Name Mine Name

Citations

Orders

Safeguards (Coal only)

Total

S&S

Non-S&S

Total

S&S

Rate

104(a) Citation

104(b) Order

104(d)(1) Citation

104(d)(1) Order104(d)(2) Order

104(e)(2) Order

314(b) Safeguard

103(k) Order

104(g)(1) Order

103(j) Order

107(a) Order

Total

1. Operator Tactics

2. Hazard Complaints /Hotline Calls

3. Plan Compliance Issues

4. Inadequate Exams

5. Accidents, Injuries, Illnesses

6. Fatal Accidents

7. Enforcement History

8. Adverse Conditions

9. Respirable Dust Issues

10. Operational Changes

Barbourville KY C 1509636 Sev.en Global Investments a.s. Blue Diamond Mining LLC dba Blue Diamond Coal Co No. 77 31 0 0 31 5 26 31 16.13% 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 x

Beckley WV C 4605437 Sev.en Global Investments a.s. Panther Creek Mining LLC Speed Mine 21 0 0 21 8 13 21 38.10% 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 x x x

Birmingham AL C 0101247 Warrior Met Coal Intermediate Holdco LLC Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC No 4 Mine 31 0 0 31 9 22 31 29.03% 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 x x x x x x

Denver CO M 0504415 Arcosa, Inc ARCOSA LWB, LLC Boulder Plant 9 0 0 9 1 8 9 11.11% 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 x x

Duluth MI M 2000061 Carmeuse Holding SA O-N Minerals (Michigan) Company O-N Minerals, Cedarville Operation 3 0 0 3 0 3 3 0.00% 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 x x

Lakewood UT C 4202263 Patrick Peterson; Shain Stoddard Gentry Mountain Mining LLc Gentry Mine #3 10 0 0 10 3 7 10 30.00% 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 x x x

Madisonville MO M 2302171 Eagle Materials Inc Central Plains Cement Co Sugar Creek Ug Mine 19 0 0 19 4 15 19 21.05% 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 x

Morgantown WV C 4609447 American Metals & Coal International Inc.; POSCO-NCR Coal Ltd; JAZ Ventu Century Mining LLC Longview Mine 7 5 0 12 3 8 11 27.27% 7 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 x x

Mt. Pleasant PA C 3607230 CONSOL Energy Inc Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company LLC Bailey Mine 20 0 0 20 2 18 20 10.00% 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 x

Norton VA C 4407199 JOD Holdings LLC Clintwood JOD, LLC Laurel Branch Surface 7 0 0 7 0 7 7 0.00% 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 x x

Pineville WV C 4609569 CONSOL Energy Inc CONSOL Mining Company LLC Itmann No 5 23 0 0 23 8 15 23 34.78% 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 x

Vincennes IL C 1103193 Prairie State Energy Campus Management Inc Prairie State Generating Company LLC Lively Grove Mine 5 0 0 5 1 4 5 20.00% 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 x x x

Warrendale PA M 3609310 Clyde Holding Inc Garrett Limestone Inc Romesburg Quarry 22 2 0 24 6 18 24 25.00% 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 x x

Total Mines: 13 National Totals 208 7 0 215 50 164 214 23.36% 208 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 215 3 2 2 4 6 1 8 2 0 1

Last Updated 11/10/2023
#### STATE in the Interest of J.S.

No. 2011-KK-2673.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re State of Louisiana; — Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 11-16365; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. JWK 11-01195.

Granted. The ruling of the court of appeal is reversed. Under the facts of the matter presented, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a continuance.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP3 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the manager of Captec
Franchise Capital Partners L.P. III (the Partnership), certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the period ended March 31,
2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. /s/ Patrick L. BeachPatrick L. BeachPresidentGP3 Asset Acquisition, LLCMay 13, 2005
Exhibit 34.1



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB
for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 25, 2016



LOGO
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Familymeds Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgardo
      A. Mercadante, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
      Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*/s/
                Edgardo A. Mercadante*Edgardo
                A. Mercadante
              President,
                Chief Executive Officer,
              Chairman
                of the Board and
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              December
                18, 2007
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00576

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

GREGG BARTHELMAN

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## O R D E R

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently pending before the Court

. On July 28, 2016, this Court

ordered the trial court clerk to forward the following original trial exhibits associated with

this appeal to this Court for its review and inspection: State’s Exhibits 29, 30, 33, 35, 36,

37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, and 46. This Court received those exhibits on August 16,

2016.2

On August 24, 2016, the State filed a motion pursuant to Rule 34.6(g)(2) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requesting that this Court supplement its previous

order and request State’s Exhibit 31, a USB drive. According to the State’s motion, the

contents of this exhibit “contains numerous photos germane to issues raised by the

[a]ppellant in his appeal.” Among several issues in his brief, a ppellant challenges the

sufficiency of the evidence for his convictions of promoting and possessing child

pornography.

Accordingly, we GRANT the State’s motion and order the trial court clerk to forward

State’s Exhibit 31 in trial court c ause number CR

- 2182

- 14

- D to this Court within ten d ays

from the date of this order

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of September

, 2016

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 835 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 835

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2018

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 
      inclusion in, the Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAP UPDATE; MAXIMUM ACREAGE AVAILABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THE 
              FLORISSANT FOSSIL BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT.

    The first section of Public Law 91-60 (83 Stat. 101) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``entitled `Proposed Florissant Fossil Beds 
        National Monument', numbered NM-FFB-7100, and dated March 1967, 
        and more particularly described by metes and bounds in an 
        attachment to that map,'' and inserting ``entitled `Florissant 
        Fossil Beds National Monument Proposed Boundary Adjustment', 
        numbered 171/132,544, and dated May 3, 2016,''; and
            (2) by striking ``six thousand acres'' and inserting 
        ``6,300 acres''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       Apr-01-1998                
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                 4,385,459
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            795,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              377,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       5,767,708
<PP&E>                                 1,351,801
<DEPRECIATION>                           256,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         6,971,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    607,609
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  59,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             5,681,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           6,971,908
<SALES>                                1,315,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,315,700
<CGS>                                    261,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            261,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         792,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (8,829)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          283,830
<INCOME-TAX>                              34,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      249,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             249,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .05
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRIS LITTLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-682

[August 13, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-010739CF10A, 10-007742CF10A, and 11-

011661CF10A .

Chris Little, Jonesboro, Georgia, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KIRK WARREN.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 100 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 100

      Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four Sit-In.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Mr. Budd (for himself, Ms. Adams, Mr. Jones, Mr. Walker, Mr. Meadows, 
 Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Holding, Mr. McHenry, Ms. Foxx, Mr. 
   Rouzer, and Mr. Price of North Carolina) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
  Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four Sit-In.

Whereas Joseph Mcneil, Jibreel Khazan (formerly Ezell Blair, Jr.), Franklin 
        McCain, and David Richmond are the members of the Greensboro Four;
Whereas the Greensboro Four Sit-In was in response to the brutal killing of 14-
        year-old Emmett Till;
Whereas the Greensboro Four attended North Carolina Agricultural and Technical 
        State University;
Whereas the Greensboro Four were refused service at the Woolworth Lunch Counter 
        in Greensboro, North Carolina, on February 1, 1960;
Whereas the Greensboro Four ignited a movement to challenge racial inequality 
        throughout the South;
Whereas the Greensboro Four were joined by female students from Bennett College 
        and Greensboro Women's College;
Whereas the sit-ins spread nationwide with over 700,000 people participating, 
        including students, clergymen, and citizens, both White and Black;
Whereas the protests resulted in more than 3,000 arrests;
Whereas the Greensboro Four remained peaceful throughout the 6-month sit-in; and
Whereas the Woolworth Lunch Counter was integrated on July 26, 1960: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the significance of the Greensboro Four and 
        acknowledges their contribution to the Civil Rights Movement, 
        and recognizes the significance of the Greensboro Four as a 
        catalyst for the mobilization of college students in the Civil 
        Rights Movement coalescing in the formation of the Student Non-
        Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC);
            (2) recognizes that ethnic and racial diversity of the 
        United States enriches and strengthens the Nation; and
            (3) encourages all States to include in their year-round 
        educational curriculum the history and contributions of the 
        Greensboro Four in North Carolina, and the country as a whole.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

tk/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PIERRE GENEVIER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

substituted for State of California

Department of Social Services; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-55236

D.C. No. CV-07-05548-AG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Pierre Genevier appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28

FILED

DEC 08 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
tk/Research 2 08-55236

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissal for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir. 2000). We

affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Genevier’s action was not

cognizable under the FTCA because, in response to the defendants’ motion to

dismiss, Genevier did not allege any theory of liability under which the defendants

would be liable as private individuals. See United States v. Olson, 546 U.S. 43, 45-

46 (2005) (holding that the FTCA does not apply to actions based on a state law

that “imposes liability on municipal or other local governments for the negligence

of their agents”); see also Keenan v. Allan, 91 F.3d 1275, 1279 (9th Cir. 1996)

(stating that the court is not obligated to scour the record in search of potential

arguments). 

Genevier’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

All pending motions are denied as moot. 

AFFIRMED.