alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         257,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  621,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,438,794
<PP&E>                                       1,162,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                 675,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,757,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,655,522
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        574
<COMMON>                                       220,696
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,757,268
<SALES>                                      1,588,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,588,367
<CGS>                                           35,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,624,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,108,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,136,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,136,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Ralph E. WHERRY, Appellant, v. James F. MARONEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

No. 14859.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1964.

Decided June 19, 1964.

Ralph E. Wherry, pro se.

Richard S. Lowe, Dist. Atty., and Richard A. Devlin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Norris-town, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is without merit. Accordingly, the order of the court below denying the appellant a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN                    
|                      |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) for
the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Rusnak, Principal Financial Officer of Sterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |             |  |  |  |     |  |                                                         
|------ |  | ----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|       |  |             |  | 
|Dated: |  | May 9, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick J. Rusnak                                   
|       |  |             |  |  |  |     |  | Patrick J. Rusnak                                       
|       |  |             |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterling and will be retained by Sterling and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit 12.1​



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Isaac Israel, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment Number 1 to annual report on Form 20-F of Kitov Pharma Ltd.;                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|Date: April 3, 2019     | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Isaac Israel        | 
|Isaac Israel            | 
|Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1035 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1035

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 11, 2018.
Whereas Nord Stream II is an underwater gas pipeline that, if completed, will 
        transport natural gas from the Russian Federation through the Baltic Sea 
        to Germany;
Whereas Russia controls the supply of nearly 40 percent of Europe's gas and 11 
        European countries rely on Russian gas for 75 percent or more for their 
        annual needs;
Whereas Nord Stream II will increase Russian control over the European energy 
        market;
Whereas Donald Tusk, the President of the European Council, stated that Nord 
        Stream II would ``not help diversification, nor would it reduce 
        [European] dependency'' on Russian gas;
Whereas it has been longstanding United States policy to support European energy 
        security through diversification of supplies, such as the Southern Gas 
        Corridor which will deliver Caspian Sea energy resources to Southern and 
        Central Europe;
Whereas the existing Ukrainian gas transit system currently has 55 billion cubic 
        meters of spare capacity which is equal to Nord Stream II's planned 
        capacity;
Whereas Ukraine has been a stable and reliable transit hub for energy flowing to 
        European destinations;
Whereas Russia's geopolitical interest in Nord Stream II is not to increase 
        European energy security, but rather to drive a wedge between countries 
        in Europe and drastically diminish Ukraine's political leverage 
        regarding Russia and the significant income Ukraine derives from transit 
        fees;
Whereas according to Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Diplomacy, 
        Sandra Oudkirk, ``because [Nord Stream II] has such a potentially large 
        impact on the national security of some of our largest partners in the 
        world, it has an impact on our national security''; and
Whereas Members of Congress on a bipartisan basis have expressed strong 
        opposition to Nord Stream II through statements and legislation: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) finds that Nord Stream II is a drastic step backwards for 
        European energy security and United States interests;
            (2) calls upon European governments to reject the Nord Stream II 
        project;
            (3) urges the President to use all available means to support 
        European energy security through a policy of reducing reliance on the 
        Russia Federation; and
            (4) supports the imposition of sanctions with respect to Nord Stream 
        II under section 232 of the Countering America's Adversaries Through 
        Sanctions Act (22 U.S.C. 9526).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Goergen,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Robert B.  Goergen                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Goergen                     |
|   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | December 12,  2005               |

 

This certification ismade solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
584 A.2d 210

#### THEODORE RUDBART v. FIRST FIDELITY BANK, N.A., N.J. MADELINE OKIN, ETC. v. FIRST FIDELITY BANK, N.A., N.J.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*41, 568 A.2d 1213.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The committee serves as a deliberative body to advise the Archivist of the United States, on technical, mission, and service issues related to the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). This includes, but is not limited to, advising and making recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation and use of the ERA system. This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives Program at                         *era.program@nara.gov*. This meeting will be recorded for transcription purposes.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 3, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. and November 4, 2010, 9 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Charles Piercy, Acting Assistant Archivist for the Office of Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road,                               ( print page 63209)                            College Park, Maryland 20740 (301) 837-3670.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

    - Opening Remarks
    - Approval of Minutes
    - Activities Reports
    - Adjournment

Dated: October 7, 2010.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-25990 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S
O F T E X A S

NO. WR-16,518-07

EX P ARTE ROBERT HARLEY MCCRA Y, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US
CAUSE NO. 439378-D IN THE 338TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam

.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the

cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte

Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted sexual

assault and sentenc ed to seventy -fiv e y ea rs’ imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls

aff irmed his conviction. McCray v. State, No. A14-89-00271- CR (Tex. App.
— Houston [14 Dist.] t h

Nov. 14, 1991) (not de signa ted for publication).

I n t h e i n s t a n t a p p l i c a t i o n , A p p l i c a n t a l l e g e s t h a t h e r e c e i v e d i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f

b o t h t r i a l a n d a p p e l l a t e c o u n s e l

. H e a l s o a l l e g e s t h a t h i s g o o d t i m e , w o r k t i m e , e d u c a t i o n a l2

t i m e a n d b o n u s t i m e c r e d i t s w e r e i m p r o p e r l y f o r f e i t e d

, t h a t h e w a s i m p r o p e r l y c o m p e l l e d t o

w e a r a G P S t r a c k i n g d e v i c e a s a c o n d i t i o n o f m a n d a t o r y s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t t h e C i v i l

C o m m i t m e n t s t a t u t e s v i o l a t e t h e p r o h i b i t i o n o n e x p o s t f a c t o p u n i s h m e n t

.

T h i s C o u r t h a s r e v i e w e d A p p l i c a n t ' s i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l c l a i m s a n d h a s

d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e y a r e b a r r e d f r o m r e v i e w u n d e r A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7

, S e c t i o n 4 o f t h e T e x a s C o d e

o f C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e

. T h e r e f o r e , t h o s e c l a i m s a r e d i s m i s s e d

. A p p l i c a n t ' s r e m a i n i n g c l a i m s

a r e w i t h o u t m e r i t ; t h u s , t h e y a r e d e n i e d

.

D O N O T P U B L I S H

D E L I V E R E D : A p r i l 2 6

, 2 0 1 7
```

                                Exhibit 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Frontier  Airlines,  Inc. (the
“Company”)  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the
“Report”),  I. Jeffery S. Potter,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 12(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffery S. Potter
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Robert H. BarghausRobert
      H. BarghausVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 8,
      2009






This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      3,159,974
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  73,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                   25,000
<INVENTORY>                                    29,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,263,281
<PP&E>                                      2,461,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,349,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         590,126
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       35,308
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,797,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,349,687
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,023,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,023,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,023,996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
No. 53.

#### David R. Mustin, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Charles E. Mustin, defendant in error.

[1.] Where an affidavit to hold a party defendant to bail in a suit pending in the Court of Common Pleas for the City of Augusta, was a substantial compliance with the provisions of the Act authorizing bail process to isjme: *Held,*that it was not necessary that it should be specially stated in the affidavit, that the defendant was a resident of the City, especially when it was alleged on the face of the proceedings that he was a resident of the City.

*Certiorari,*from Richmond Superior Court.

The plaintiff in error was held to bail upon process issuing from the Court of Common Pleas of Augusta, in an action of assumpsit, upon the statutory provisions applicable to that Court, in November, 1852. He gave bond for his appearance *358at the December Term, and at that Term moved the Court to dismiss the bail process, “because the affidavit did.not state that the defendant in that Court was of said City, or any other fact entitling the Court, *prima facie,*to jurisdiction. This motion was overruled by the Court, and the plaintiff in error removed the case, by *writ of certiorari,*to the Superior Court, upon exceptions to the decision of the City Court, upon the above stated motion.

In answer to the *writ of certiorari,*Judge Gould returned, “ that the motion to dismiss the bail writ was overruled, .because, though the affidavit for bail did not state the faet that the defendant was a resident of the City of Augusta, that fact did appear in the bail process; and further, that the suit in which said decision was made, has not yet been decided, nor in order for trial, but the above motion was overruled at the appearance term of said Court, which is for trial at the term now ensuing.

Upon this return to the *writ of certiorari,*Judge Starnes overruled the *certiorari,*to which decision the plaintiff in error excepts.

A. II. H. Dawson, for plaintiff in error. ■

A. J. & T. W. Miller, for defendant.-

*By the Court.*

Warner, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The objection to the bail affidavit is, that it does not state that the defendant is a resident of the City of Augusta. It appears, however, on the face of the record, that the défendant is a resident of the City,, which was sufficient to give to the Court of Common Pleas of the City of Augusta jurisdiction of the cause.

The affidavit to hold the defendant to bail, is a substantial compliance with the Statute authorizing bail process to issue in that Court; therefore, let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.