64708 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1717] 

Reorganization and Expansion of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 5 Under 

Alternative Site Framework; Seattle, 

WA 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) in 

December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; 

correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an 

option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Port of Seattle, grantee 

of Foreign-Trade Zone 5, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket 

30–2010, filed 04/29/2010) for authority 

to reorganize and expand under the ASF 

with a service area of King and 

Snohomish Counties, Washington 

(dependent on case-by-case concurrence 

from the Port of Everett for the latter 

county), within and adjacent to the 

Seattle Customs and Border Protection 

port of entry, FTZ 5’s existing Sites 1, 

2 and 4 would be categorized as magnet 

sites, existing Site 3 would be 

categorized as a usage-driven sites, and 

the grantee proposes one additional 

usage-driven site (Site 5); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 24571, 05/05/10) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize and 

expand FTZ 5 under the alternative site 

framework is approved, subject to the 

FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.28, to the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

the overall general-purpose zone 

project, to a five-year ASF sunset 

provision for magnet sites that would 

terminate authority for Sites 2 and 4 if 

not activated by October 31, 2015, and 

to a three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 3 and 5 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a 

bona fide customs purpose by October 

31, 2013. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26409 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1718] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

3 Under Alternative Site Framework; 

San Francisco, CA 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) in 

December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; 

correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an 

option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the San Francisco Port 

Commission, grantee of Foreign-Trade 

Zone 3, submitted an application to the 

Board (FTZ Docket 39–2010, filed 05/ 

21/2010) for authority to reorganize 

under the ASF with a service area of the 

City and County of San Francisco and 

San Mateo County, California, within 

and adjacent to the San Francisco 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry, FTZ 3’s existing Site 1 would be 

deleted and Sites 2 through 4 would be 

categorized as usage-driven sites; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 29974, 05/28/10) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 3 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, 

and to a three-year ASF sunset 

provision for usage-driven sites that 

would terminate authority for Sites 2, 3 

and 4 if no foreign-status merchandise 

is admitted for a bona fide customs 

purpose by October 31, 2013. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

October 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26407 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1716] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

75 under Alternative Site Framework; 

Phoenix, AZ 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) in 

December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; 

correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an 

option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the City of Phoenix, grantee 

of Foreign-Trade Zone 75, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket 

24–2010, filed 03/31/10) for authority to 

reorganize under the ASF with a service 

area of Maricopa County and portions of 

Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona, 

within and adjacent to the Phoenix 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry, and FTZ 75’s existing Sites 1 

through 5 would be categorized as 

magnet sites; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 17692, 04/07/10) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES