alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel  714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2014-CCRE17

 

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A)            A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”) and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and 

B)            That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator         

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1256

JIANYI ZHANG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SETHURAMAN PANCHANATHAN, In his official capacity as the Director of the 

National Science Foundation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:23-cv-01571-LMB-LRV)

Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 29, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jianyi Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1256 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jianyi Zhang appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint with 

prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Zhang’s informal brief 

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). To the extent that Zhang challenges the district 

court’s decision to dismiss his claim rather than granting leave to amend, a court does not 

abuse its discretion “by declining to grant a motion [for leave to amend] that was never 

properly made.” Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharms. Inc., 549 F.3d 618, 631 (4th Cir. 2008). 

However, because the basis of the court’s dismissal of the complaint was a lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction, the dismissal must be without prejudice. Ali v. Hogan, 26 F.4th 

587, 600 (4th Cir. 2022) (“A dismissal for lack of standing—or any defect in subject matter 

jurisdiction—must be one without prejudice, because a court has no power to adjudicate 

and dispose of a claim on the merits.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order as modified to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1256 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12337 and #12338]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Texas dated 09/29/2010. *Incident:*
                         Remnants of Hurricane Karl. *Incident Period:*
                         09/18/2010 through  09/24/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         09/29/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/29/2010. *Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/29/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Nueces, *Contiguous Counties:*
                     Texas: Aransas, Jim Wells, Kleberg, San Patricio. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12337 8 and for economic injury is 12338 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Texas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 29, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-25431 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-04-387-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

		V.

JOSHUA ROY NELSON	  						  APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4 OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “State’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal And Issue Mandate.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).  As agreed by the parties, the mandate will issue immediately.  See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c).	

	It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(f) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.  

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 24, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Samuel B. Hay, III, Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                            
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ SAMUEL B. HAY, III                     
|                       |  |     |  | Samuel B. Hay, III, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Alan B. Levan, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofBankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly reportbased on such evaluation;  d. disclosed in this quarterly report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 9, 2005By: /s/Alan B. Levan
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PRA Health Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin Shannon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 3, 2015

By:

/s/ COLIN SHANNON Colin Shannon President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)


---
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.01
                                LETTER OF INTENT


May 8, 1997

Definitions:

Waste Resources Reclamation, LLC is the purchaser identified as WRR.  Eurectec,
Inc. is the vendor, identified as ET.

1.  WRR, and ET, have communicated over a period of approximately one year,
during which time by way of exchanging information relating to their respective
interests in the processing of waste rubber to produce raw material to be used
in the manufacturing of a variety of new value added products.

2.  WRR.  has made known to ET its plan to develop a recycling/manufacturing
project in Louisville, Kentucky and its interest in utilizing the ET. process
and manufacturing equipment as a part of its future operation.

3.  WRR.  has disclosed to ET. its funding source, Steadfast of Great Britain,
and of its anticipated time of funding, May-June 1997.

4.  Based on the above and such other commonalties as have developed over a
period of months, WRR.  is presenting to ET. this conditional Purchase
Agreement, subject to available funding as cited in #3 above.

5.  Subject to such formal conditions as may be agreed upon at the time of
funding, it is the intent of WRR. to purchase a Eurectec Pressmaster product
manufacturing Systems, which will include a Pressmaster 200 Molding Press, a
Blendmaster Mixer, a Flockmaster Flocking System which three machines are
capable of effectively supporting the production capacity of the Pressmaster 200
Molding Press.

Our purchase agreement will also include such molds as are to be designated.  At
such time as the initial product line for the ET. System has been selected.

6.  Such other ancillary equipment, values controls, meters, special tools and
supplies as are necessary for the proper installation, testing, adjustments,
training of operating personnel will be a part of the formal sales contract and
their respective costs, appropriately listed.

/S/ J.M. Morganti             5/8/97
-----------------
J.M. Morganti
Executive Vice President

/S/ Keith J. Fryer            5/8/97
------------------
Keith J. Fryer
Executive Vice President<PAGE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIANSEN.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul R. Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: January 28, 2004                  /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________ Nos. 98-41515 & 98-41516 Summary Calendar

________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (L-89-CR-618-1 & 89-618-01)

____________________________________________________________________ March 15, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, appointed to repre s ent Eduardo Ramirez, has filed a motion to withdraw an d a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967 ), to which Ramirez has responded. Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED ; counsel is excused from furth er responsibilities herein; and the appeal is DISMISSED
. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
DISMISSED
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Majority and

Dissenting Opinion s filed August 15 , 2023.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00472

- CR

IN RE JOHN DAVIS BERNARD , J R. , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 184th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1726657



### MEMORANDUM MAJORITY OPINION

On July 7, 2023 , relator John Davis Bernard
, Jr

. filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to set aside his indictment in the underlying case

. Relator is seeking habeas

- corpus relief in his mandamus petition . The courts of appeal have no original habeas

- corpus juri sdiction in criminal matters. In re2

Ayers , 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.―Houston [14 th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d)). Original jurisdiction to grant an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in
those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.05. Therefore, this court is without jurisdiction to consider relator ’ s petition requesting habeas co rpus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain (Spain, J., dissenting)

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Nick B. Tressler, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Senseonics Holdings, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: April 28, 2020 | By: | /s/ Nick B. Tressler                                         
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Nick B. Tressler                                             
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form
10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended
June 30, 2004



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Trevor Turbidy, Chief
Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by such Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Trevor Turbidy                        
|                     |  |     |  | Trevor Turbidy                            
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Certifications
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Thomas E. Fairley, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by such Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------
|Date: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Fairley
|                     |  |     |  | Thomas E. Fairley    
|                     |  |     |  | President and CEO