alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15


 


CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED
FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. [
* * * ] INDICATES THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED.


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3


to


JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT


between


 


BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC


300 Chestnut Ridge Road


Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677


USA


hereinafter referred to as "BMW"


 


and


 


SOLID POWER, INC.


486 S. Pierce Ave., Suite E


Louisville, CO 80027


USA


hereinafter referred to as "Solid Power"


 






     


     


    

 


This
Amendment No.3 to Joint Development Agreement (this “Amendment”), is effective as of November 1, 2021 (the
 “Effective Date”), and is between Solid Power, Inc., with a principal place of business at 486 S. Pierce Ave.,
Suite E, Louisville, CO 80027, USA (“Solid Power”), and BMW of North America, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company with a principal place of business at 300 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA (“BMW”, and together
with Solid Power, the “Parties”). The Parties entered into a Joint Development Agreement on July 1, 2017, which
was subsequently amended on February 18, 2021 and March 22, 2021 (as so amended, the “JDA”). The Parties
desire that the JDA shall be amended as set forth in this Amendment.


 


Purpose:
The purpose of this Amendment is to revise the Milestone schedule within Annex 2 of the JDA.


 


		1.	Solid Power and BMW hereby agree to replace the milestone schedule originally set forth within Annex 2
of the JDA with the schedule attached to this Amendment as Exhibit A, effective as of the Effective Date.



 


ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE JDA AND ANNEXES TO THE JDA REMAIN
UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


As
represented in the attached schedule, Tasks 1.3.3 and 1.3.6 of Work Package 1 (WP1) are superseded by deliveries of [ * * *
] and [ * * * ] cells, respectively. All cell deliveries
made to BMW outside of these tasks will be subject to PO.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused its duly-authorized representative to execute this Amendment as of the Effective
Date.


 


	Solid Power, Inc.	 	BMW
                                            of North America, LLC
	 	 	 
	/s/ Derek Johnson	 	/s/ Shannen Rosser
	Signature	 	Signature
	Derek Johnson	 	Shannen Rosser
	Printed Name	 	Printed Name
	 	 	 
	Title	 	Title
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Claudia Marschall
	Signature	 	Signature
	 	 	Claudia Marschall
	Printed Name	 	Printed Name
	 	 	 
	Title	 	Title



 






     


     


    

 


Exhibit A


 


[ * * * ]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DENNIS L. PRENDES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 600 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 16th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before November 15, 2010. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: SBA Direct and SBA Online Community.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    SBA Form Number: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Web-site users.
    Responses: 710,000.
    Annual Burden: 4,000.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2010-25828 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# Corps releases draft master plan for two eastern North Dakota reservoirs

**ST. PAUL, Minn. –**The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, is seeking comments on the draft master plan and environmental assessment for Lake Ashtabula, near Valley City, North Dakota, and Homme Reservoir, near Park River, North Dakota.

The Corps recently completed its draft master plan and is now seeking comments prior to finalizing it. The plan, last updated in 2006 for Ashtabula and Homme in 1970, focuses on what could and should happen over the life of the two reservoirs but is flexible enough to adapt to unforeseen or changing conditions. The plan also includes all lands -- fee, easement or other interest -- acquired for the project to support operations and authorized missions. This plan will also guide and articulate the Corps’ responsibilities pursuant to applicable federal laws, policies and regulations.

This plan involves a federal project that requires a review of environmental effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. A final determination on the draft environmental assessment will be made following a 30-day public review period. A copy of the draft environmental assessment can be viewed and downloaded from the St. Paul District website at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Home/Public-Notices/.

The public review and comment period on the draft master plan and environmental assessment begins today, July 29 and ends Aug. 28. Questions on the project or the environmental assessment should be directed to Dillan Laaker at (309) 794-5636 or at Dillan.J.Laaker@usace.army.mil. Please address all correspondence on this project, including formal comments on the environmental assessment, to District Commander, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, ATTN: Regional Planning and Environment Division North, 180 Fifth Street East, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1638. 

– 30 –

Release no. 20-061

Lake Ashtabula

Baldhill Dam

Homme Lake

Homme Reservoir

master plan

Sheyenne River

park river

Valley City

North Dakota

flood risk management

recreation

St. Paul District

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in or in Relation to Côte d'Ivoire

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, the President declared a national emergency, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict in Côte d'Ivoire. The situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire, which has been addressed by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and subsequent resolutions, has resulted in the massacre of large numbers of civilians, widespread human rights abuses, significant political violence and unrest, and fatal attacks against international peacekeeping forces. Because the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on February 7, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond February 7, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13396.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                    and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2010-2574

Billing code 3195-W0-P
585 A.2d 354

#### JANINA SAMSEL v. CELOTEX.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-3319-000]


Astoria Energy II LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 5, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Astoria Energy II LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 25, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcbab9aebfb39290959299af898c8c938e88bc9a998e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25674 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,250,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,232,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,188,678
<PP&E>                                       3,906,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 778,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,368,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,399,745
<BONDS>                                        284,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,499,490
<OTHER-SE>                                (23,250,572)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,368,066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               934,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,096,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,096,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,096,025)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
547 A.2d 503

#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, Appellant *v.*Howard Louis Key, Jr., Appellee.

Submitted on briefs April 12, 1988,

to Judges Doyle and McGinley, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three.

*Christopher J. Clements,*Assistant Counsel, with him, *Harold H. Cramer,*Assistant Chief Counsel, and *John L. Heaton,*Chief Counsel, for appellant.

*Howard Louis Key, Jr.,*appellee, for himself.

*342September 9, 1988:

Opinion by

Senior Judge- Kalish,

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which sustained appellees, Howard Louis Key, Jr., appeal from a six-month revocation of his driving privileges. We reverse the trial court and reinstate the suspension.

Appellee was cited for a violation of section 1543(a) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1543(a) (driving while operating privileges were suspended). DOT received a certified record of appellees conviction for this offense dated September 17, 1986, indicating that the fine and costs had been paid. DOT revoked appellees operating privileges for a period of six months (since amended to one year).

The trial court sustained appellees appeal because there was some doubt as to who paid the fine and whether or not appellee had been properly suspended in the first place. The trial courts scope of review is limited to determining whether the motorist has actually been convicted of a traffic violation and whether DOT has faithfully observed the provisions of the Vehicle Code in suspending the motorists operating privileges; The trial court may not consider the question of whether the motorist should have been convicted. *Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Schmidt,*57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 318, 426 A.2d 1222 (1981). Here, the trial court was in error.

The payment of the fine was a plea of guilty. However, the payment of the fine is not the issue here. The issue here is whether appellee has, in fact, been convicted. *Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Edwards,*103 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 43, 519 A.2d 1083 (1987).

*343Furthermore, a conviction may not be attacked collaterally in a suspension appeal. *Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Siedlecki,*7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130, 300 A.2d 287 (1973).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court and reinstate the suspension.

Order

Now, September 9, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, No. 1230 December Term, 1986, dated March 19, 1987, is reversed; and the suspension of appellees motor vehicle operating privileges is reinstated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1998 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         194,378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,867,653<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,062,031
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,562,031<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,726,700
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,833,331<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,562,031
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,471,618<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,354,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (24,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,378,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,378,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE DUE FROM AFFILIATED COMPANIES.
<F2>AN INVESTMENT IN PREFERRED SHARES OF CHIEFTAIN INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., AT
COST OF $78,500,000 HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN TOTAL ASSETS.
<F3>ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL OF $14,998,000 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK) AND
$60,676,203 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO PREFERRED STOCK) HAS BEEN ADDED TO RETAINED
EARNINGS OF $4,159,128 IN CALCULATING OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.
<F4>REVENUES ARE EARNED EXCLUSIVELY FROM TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 20

- 00411

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 845221

Style: Pharus Funding , LLC as Assignee of LHR, Inc.

v Jorge J. Garcia

Date motion filed * : August 27, 2021

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

____ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss.

Date: January 11, 2022
No. 87-953.

#### Konizeski et al. *v.*Livermore Labs et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 87-1013.

#### Horne *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

No. 20-1239

IN RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL HOLDING SE FOR

AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN
DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS

PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL HOLDING SE, Petitioner, Appellee,

v.

JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (USA); JOHN HANCOCK ADVISERS, LLC; JOHN HANCOCK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Respondents, Appellants,

FPCAP LLC; FINEPOINT CAPITAL LP; FINEPOINT PARTNERS LLC, Respondents.

_____________________

No. 20-1241

IN RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL HOLDING SE FOR

AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN
DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS

PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL HOLDING SE, Petitioner, Appellee,

v.

FINEPOINT CAPITAL LP; FINEPOINT PARTNERS LLC; FPCAP LLC; JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (USA); JOHN HANCOCK ADVISERS, LLC; JOHN HANCOCK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Respondents,

JOHN HANCOCK WORLDWIDE INVESTORS PLC; CRAIG BROMLEY, as Trustee for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust, John Hancock Funds II, John Hancock Funds III, and John Hancock Strategic Series for JHF Income Fund,

Interested Parties, Appellants.**ERRATA SHEET**

The judgment of this Court issued on January 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

On page 11, line 4, insert the word "discovery" after "1782(a)."
No. 13,812.

#### Miller *v.*Burton et al.

*Judgment.*— Default.—Courts *Adjournment.*— Vacation.—Where a defendant, duly served with process, is notified to appear at a day in regular term, but by reason of the court’s adjournment before the day fixed the appearance day falls in vacation, the action of the court in adjourning, it being the duty of the defendant to appear and defend, does not prejudice the rights of the plaintiff, and a default and judgment against the defendant will not be set aside.

Prom the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

*B. W. Langdon*and *T. F. Gaylord,*for appellant.

*G. O. Behm, A. O. Behm, J. F. McHugh*and *G. J. Eacock,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

— The appellant filed the complaint contained *225in the record asking that a default and judgment entered against him be set aside. The appellees demurred to the complaint, and the parties submitted the matter to the court for decision.

Filed Dec. 12, 1889.

The complaint does not show an excuse for failing to appear and defend the original action. The facts bearing upon this question are these: On the 29th day of June, 1886, the appellees caused a summons to be issued, and, by proper endorsement, noted the 15th day of July, 1886, as the day on which the appellant was required to appear. Before the time fixed the court adjourned until the September term, but, at the time the summons was issued and served no order of adjournment had been made, so that the appellant was notified to appear at a day in regular term, and not at a day in vacation, as counsel erroneously assume. As the appellant was duly served with process it became his duty to appear and defend, and the action of the court in adjourning could not prejudice the rights of the appellees who had done all that the law required them to do.

The submission of the cause was such as the court and the parties had a right to treat asa submission for final decision. *Nord*v. *Marty,*56 Ind. 531; *Slagle*v. Bodmer, 75 Ind. 330; *Brumbaugh*v. *Stockman,*83 Ind. 583; *Clandy*v. *Caldwell,*106 Ind. 256. It is, perhaps, true that where a demurrer is interposed the trial court may, in its discretion, permit an amendment of the complaint, but it is not bound to do so. In this instance there was clearly no abuse of this discretionary power.

Judgment affirmed.