63214 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices 

The Need for the Proposed Action 

The proposed action is needed so that 

NSPM can use Optimized ZIRLOTM, an 

advanced alloy for fuel rod cladding and 

other assembly structural components at 

the PINGP. 

Section 50.46 of 10 CFR and 10 CFR 

part 50, Appendix K, make no 

provisions for use of fuel rods clad in a 

material other than zircaloy or 

ZIRLOTM. Since the chemical 

composition of the Optimized ZIRLOTM

alloy differs from the specifications for 

zircaloy or ZIRLOTM, a plant-specific 

exemption is required to allow the use 

of the Optimized ZIRLOTM alloy as a 

cladding material or in other assembly 

structural components at the PINGP. 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC has completed its 

environmental assessment of the 

proposed exemption. The staff has 

concluded that the proposed action to 

approve the use of an additional fuel 

rod cladding material would not 

significantly affect plant safety and 

would not have a significant adverse 

effect on the probability of an accident 

occurring. 

The NRC staff’s safety evaluation will 

be provided in the exemption that will 

be issued as part of the letter to the 

licensee approving the exemption to the 

regulation, if granted. 

The proposed action would not result 

in an increased radiological hazard 

beyond those previously analyzed in the 

Final Environmental Statement for the 

PINGP dated May 1973 (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML081840311). There 

will be no change to radioactive 

effluents that affect radiation exposures 

to plant workers and members of the 

public. Therefore, no changes or 

different types of radiological impacts 

are expected as a result of the proposed 

exemption. 

The proposed action does not result 

in changes to land use or water use, or 

result in changes to the quality or 

quantity of non-radiological effluents. 

No changes to the National Pollution 

Discharge Elimination System permit 

are needed. No effects on the aquatic or 

terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the 

plant, or to threatened, endangered, or 

protected species under the Endangered 

Species Act, or impacts to essential fish 

habitat covered by the MagnusonStevens Act are expected. There are no 

impacts to the air or ambient air quality. 

There are no impacts to historical and 

cultural resources. There would be no 

impact to socioeconomic resources. 

Therefore, no changes to or different 

types of non-radiological environmental 

impacts are expected as a result of the 

proposed exemption. 

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

action. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the staff considered denial of the 

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ 

alternative). Denial of the application 

request would result in no change in 

current environmental impacts. The 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

action and the alternative action are 

similar. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The action does not involve the use of 

any different resources than those 

considered in the Final Environmental 

Statement for the PINGP dated May 

1973 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML081840311). 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

In accordance with its stated policy, 

on September 3, 2010, the staff 

consulted with the Minnesota State 

official, Mr. Stephen Rakow of the 

Minnesota Office of Energy Security, 

regarding the environmental impact of 

the proposed action. The State official 

had no comments. 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

On the basis of the environmental 

assessment, the NRC concludes that the 

proposed action will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC has determined not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

Further Information 

For further details with respect to the 

proposed action, see the licensee’s letter 

dated November 24, 2009 (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML093280883), as 

supplemented by letter dated May 26, 

2010 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML101480083). Documents may be 

examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 

NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), 

located at One White Flint North, Public 

File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike 

(first floor), Rockville, Maryland. 

Publicly available records will be 

accessible electronically from the 

Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 

at the NRC Web site, http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

Persons who do not have access to 

ADAMS or who encounter problems in 

accessing the documents located in 

ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR 

Reference staff by telephone at 1–800– 

397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or send an 

e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of September 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Thomas J. Wengert, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch III–1, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25878 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2010–0267] 

Errata Notice; Notice of Public 

Workshop on a Potential Rulemaking 

for Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing 

Facilities 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Errata Notice; Notice of Public 

Workshop. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose 

Cuadrado, Office of Nuclear Material 

Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001, telephone 301–492– 

3287; e-mail Jose.Cuadrado@nrc.gov. 

SUMMARY: The Notice of Public 

Workshop on a Potential Rulemaking for 

Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing 

Facilities issued on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 

45167, August 2, 2010), states that the 

date and location of the public 

workshops are as follows: 

The public workshops will be held in 

Rockville, Maryland, on September 7–8, 

2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and in 

Albuquerque, New Mexico, on the week of 

October 4, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The 

September 7–8, 2010, workshop will be held 

at the Hilton Washington, DC/Rockville Hotel 

& Executive Meeting Center, located at 1750 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The 

exact dates and location for the October 2010 

workshop in Albuquerque, New Mexico, will 

be noticed no fewer than ten (10) days prior 

to the workshop [* * *] 

The dates and location for the October 

2010 workshop have been finalized. The 

workshop will be held on October 19– 

20, 2010, at the Sheraton Albuquerque 

Uptown Hotel, located at 2600 

Louisiana Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, 

New Mexico. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 5th day 

of October, 2010. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices 63215 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Thomas G. Hiltz, 

Acting Deputy Director, Special Projects and 

Technical Support Directorate, Division of 

Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of 

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25874 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Federal Salary Council Meeting 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice of Meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Salary Council 

will meet on October 29, 2010, at the 

time and location shown below. The 

Council is an advisory body composed 

of representatives of Federal employee 

organizations and experts in the fields 

of labor relations and pay policy. The 

Council makes recommendations to the 

President’s Pay Agent (the Secretary of 

Labor and the Directors of the Office of 

Management and Budget and the Office 

of Personnel Management) about the 

locality pay program for General 

Schedule employees under section 5304 

of title 5, United States Code. The 

Council’s recommendations cover the 

establishment or modification of locality 

pay areas, the coverage of salary 

surveys, the process of comparing 

Federal and non-Federal rates of pay, 

and the level of comparability payments 

that should be paid. 

The October meeting will be devoted 

to reviewing the results of pay 

comparisons and formulating its 

recommendations to the President’s Pay 

Agent on pay comparison methods, 

locality pay rates, and locality pay areas 

and boundaries for 2012. The meeting is 

open to the public. Please contact the 

Office of Personnel Management at the 

address shown below if you wish to 

submit testimony or present material to 

the Council at the meeting. 

DATES: October 29, 2010, at 10 a.m. 

Location: Office of Personnel 

Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 

5H17, Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles D. Grimes, III, Deputy Associate 

Director, Employee Services, Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 7H31, Washington, DC 

20415–8200. Phone (202) 606–2838; 

FAX (202) 606–4264; or e-mail at payperformance-policy@opm.gov. 

For the President’s Pay Agent. 

John Berry, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25829 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–39–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

International Product Change— 

Inbound Expedited Services 4 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives 

notice of its filing a request with the 

Postal Regulatory Commission to add 

Inbound Expedited Services 4 to the 

Competitive Product List pursuant to 39 

U.S.C. 3642. 

DATES: October 14, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Margaret M. Falwell, 703–292–3576. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

United States Postal Service® hereby 

gives notice that it filed with the Postal 

Regulatory Commission, on September 

30, 2010, a request to add Inbound 

Expedited Services 4 to the Competitive 

Product List. The bases for determining 

that this is a competitive product and 

that it satisfies the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633 are included in the 

documents available in Docket Nos. 

MC2010–37 and CP2010–126 on the 

Postal Regulatory Commission’s Web 

site, http://www.prc.gov. 

Neva R. Watson, 

Attorney, Legislative. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25911 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Reporting and Recordkeeping 

Requirements Under OMB Review 

AGENCY: Small Business Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of Reporting 

Requirements Submitted for OMB 

Review. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), agencies are required to 

submit proposed reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements to OMB for 

review and approval, and to publish a 

notice in the Federal Register notifying 

the public that the agency has made 

such a submission. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

November 15, 2010. If you intend to 

comment but cannot prepare comments 

promptly, please advise the OMB 

Reviewer and the Agency Clearance 

Officer before the deadline. 

Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 

83–1), supporting statement, and other 

documents submitted to OMB for 

review may be obtained from the 

Agency Clearance Officer. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments 

concerning this notice to: Agency 

Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, 

Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 

Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 

20416; and OMB Reviewer, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 

Officer, (202) 205–7044. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: SBA Direct and SBA Online 

Community. 

Frequency: On Occasion. 

SBA Form Number: N/A. 

Description of Respondents: SBA 

Web-site users. 

Responses: 710,000. 

Annual Burden: 4,000. 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25828 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Investor 

Education and Advocacy, 

Washington, DC 20549–0213. 

Extension: 

Form 6–K; OMB Control No. 3235–0116; 

SEC File No. 270–107. 

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments 

on the collection of information 

summarized below. The Commission 

plans to submit this existing collection 

of information to the Office of 

Management and Budget for extension 

and approval. 

Form 6–K (17 CFR 249.306) is a 

disclosure document under the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 

U.S.C. 78a et seq.) that must be filed by 

a foreign private issuer to report 

material information promptly after the 

occurrence of specified or other 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES