alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [NRC-2010-0267]

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Errata Notice; Notice of Public Workshop.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jose Cuadrado, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-492-3287; e-mail                         *Jose.Cuadrado@nrc.gov*.                    

# SUMMARY:

The Notice of Public Workshop on a Potential Rulemaking for Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities issued on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 45167, August 2, 2010), states that the date and location of the public workshops are as follows:

The public workshops will be held in Rockville, Maryland, on September 7-8, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on the week of October 4, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The September 7-8, 2010, workshop will be held at the Hilton Washington, DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, located at 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The exact dates and location for the October 2010 workshop in Albuquerque, New Mexico, will be noticed no fewer than ten (10) days prior to the workshop [* * *]

The dates and location for the October 2010 workshop have been finalized. The workshop will be held on October 19-20, 2010, at the Sheraton Albuquerque Uptown Hotel, located at 2600 Louisiana Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

                        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this                         *5th*                         day of October, 2010.                    
      ( print page 63215)    
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Thomas G. Hiltz,

Acting Deputy Director, Special Projects and Technical Support Directorate, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 2010-25874 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
585 A.2d 394

#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PETER SCHMITT AND 5738 CORPORATION.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*619, 570 A.2d 488)
Exhibit 4.412

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 177389 dated January 28, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until January 28, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 02, 2019 No. 589-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE

OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,175,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,429,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,151,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,254,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               945,000
<PP&E>                                      94,828,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,561,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,691,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,125,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,248,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,691,000
<SALES>                                    100,895,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,895,000
<CGS>                                       70,421,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,421,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,992,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,577,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,905,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,008,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,897,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,897,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


62 West 45th St.


5th Floor


New York, NY 10036


 


December 17, 2021


 


m+ Buffer 20 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 1-24


 


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, New York 10286


 


		Re:	m+ funds Trust, Series 1-24 (the “Trust”)



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-261164) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this
letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Name: Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Title:  Executive Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2092

EUGENIO DUQUESNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE FIDELITY BANK; JIM TURNER, Bank Official;

REE GARDNER, Bank Official; KELLY G. HALLMAN,

Bank Official; LOUIS C. ROSSER, Sheriff;

SOCIAL SERVICES, Harnett County; ELIZABETH

MURCHISON, Harnett County Social Services;

MARY ANN STUMP, Agent, Harnett County Social

Services; RHONDA H. ENNIS, Agent, Harnett

County Social Services; JACK D. BRYAN, Agent,

Harnett County Social Services; JACK D.

BUZZARD, Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-8-5-BR)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Duquesne v.

Fidelity Bank, No. CA-95-8-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1995; May 2,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.7


 


Amendment No. 1
to


Amended and Restated

Employment Agreement


 


This Amendment No. 1 (the
 "Amendment"), to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 3, 2019, by and among Sterling Bancorp,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Sterling National Bank, a national banking association organized and existing
under the laws of the United States of America (the "Bank" and, together with the Company, "Sterling"),
and Javier Evans ("Executive") (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of December 15,
2021, to be effective on January 1, 2022 (the "Effective Date").


 


WHEREAS, the Company,
the Bank and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Executive's employment with the Company and the Bank on
the Effective Date for a period of one year.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, the Company, the Bank and Executive hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.       
Section 2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


2.       Employment
Period.


 


(a)       Duration.
Executive's period of employment with Sterling under this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue until December
31, 2022 (or, if a Change in Control (as defined below) occurs prior to such anniversary, the second anniversary of the date of the Change
in Control, if later), unless terminated prior thereto by either Sterling or Executive in accordance with Section 6 hereof (such
period of employment being the "Employment Period").


 


2.       Except
as expressly stated herein, this Amendment does not amend or otherwise modify any of the terms or conditions of the Agreement, which shall
remain in full force and effect pursuant to its terms. Any terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.
To the extent applicable, each Party hereby represents and warrants that its respective signatory has been and is on the date of this
Amendment duly authorized by all necessary corporate action to execute this Amendment.


 


3.       This
Amendment may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, which, taken together, shall constitute collectively one and the same
agreement.


 








[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company and the Bank have caused this Agreement to be executed and Executive has hereunto set his hand, all as of the Effective Date
specified above.


 




































	 	STERLING BANCORP
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jack L. Kopnisky
	 		Name: Jack L. Kopnisky
	 		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer



 


	 	STERLING NATIONAL BANK
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jack L. Kopnisky
	 		Name: Jack L. Kopnisky
	 		Title: Chief Executive Officer



 


	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	/s/ Javier Evans
	 	Javier Evans
Exhibit 4.399

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 176259 dated November 24, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

data transmission services for voice

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until November 24, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 07, 2019 No. 462-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6497

FRANKLIN ANTONIO BENJAMIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:04-cv-22872-TLW) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 21, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Franklin Antonio Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Franklin Antonio Benjamin seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Benjamin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### W. R. B. CORPORATION et al., d/b/a Robertson Construction Company, et al., Appellants, v. Odell GEER, d/b/a Odell Geer Company, and B. H. (Bert) Camp, d/b/a B. H. C. Materials Company, Appellees.

No. 20999.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 1964.

*181Arthur Mitchell, Robert C. Howell, Jake Jacobsen, Austin, Tex., for appellants.

Lee Curtis, Belton, Tex., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On its former appearance in this Court, W. R. B. Corp. v. Geer, 5 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 750, we remanded this case because the District Judge had not properly applied the clearly erroneous standard in the review of the findings of the special master. F.R.Civ.P. 53(e) (2). Our reconsideration on the briefs and argument and the record made by the District Judge on remand reveals two things without question. First, on remand the District Court carefully applied the correct legal standard which we epitomized in our former opinion. Second, applying those standards, there was ample basis for sustaining the Special Master’s findings. No point would be served by discussing each of these items or the evidence pro and con on them. There was conflict and the Special Master resolved it. There is ample basis for his resolution.

That leaves only the question of law as to whether the District Judge could disregard the findings of the Master relating to the effect of certain releases. We agree with the District Court that under the controlling Texas cases, e. g., Oviett v. Warner, Tex.Comm’n App., 1926, 288 S.W. 434; First Texas Prudential Ins. Co. v. Conner, Tex.Civ.App., 1919, 209 S.W. 417, the releases lacked legal consideration to support a discharge of the particular items allowed by the Master. This being true, the Master’s findings relating to the releases were clearly erroneous if findings of fact, and were clearly wrong if conclusions of law. In either event the District Judge properly set them aside.

Affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID LINDSEY.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 13,823.

#### Ledbetter et al. *v.*Davis et al.

*Pleading.*— Written *Instrument.*— Filing *of Copy.*— Where a complaint alleges the execution of a written lease, the filing of a copy properly designated, which copy is set forth in the record, is sufficient.

*Same.*— Exhibit.—Separate *Paragraphs of Complaint.*— Where a written instrument is filed as an exhibit to one paragraph of a complaint, and appropriately designated, it need not be set out with each paragraph, for one exhibit is sufficient for all the paragraphs of a pleading.

*Pbadd.*— False *Statements as to Quantity of Land.*— Reliance *Upon.*— Where false statements as to the quantity of land are made for a fraudulent purpose, the plaintiff who relies upon them will not be denied a re*120covery because be acted upon the representations without measuring the land.

Filed Nov. 20, 1889.

From the Grant Circuit Court.

*G. W. Haney, H. J. Paulus*and *S. Moore,*for appellants.

*J. L. Custer,*for appellees.

Elliott, C. J.

— The appellants insist that a written lease is the foundation of the complaint, and that as it is not incorporated in the pleading or filed as an exhibit, the complaint is bad. The appellants are in error in asserting that the instrument is not filed and referred to in the pleading. It is averred that a written lease was executed, that a copy of it is filed marked exhibit “A,” and a copy thus designated is set forth in the record. This is sufficient. *Straughan*v. *Fairchild,*80 Ind. 598; *Whitworth*v. *Malcomb,*82 Ind. 454; *Northwestern, etc., Co.*v. *Hazelett,*105 Ind. 212.

Where a written instrument is filed as an exhibit to one paragraph of a complaint, and appropriately designated, it need not be set out with each paragraph, for one exhibit is sufficient for all the paragraphs of a pleading. *State, ex rel.,*v. *Brown,*80 Ind. 425; *Scotten*v. *Randolph,*96 Ind. 581; *Hochstedler*v. *Hochstedler,*108 Ind. 506.

It is argued that the appellees can not recover damagés caused by their reliance upon the untruthful statements of the appellants, for the reason that by measurement they could have ascertained the truth. There is no merit in this contention. Where false statements as to the quantity of land are made for a fraudulent purpose, the plaintiff who relies upon them will not be denied a recovery because he acted upon the representations without measuring the land. *West*v. *Wright,*98 Ind. 335; *Dodge*v. *Pope,*93 Ind. 480; *Jones*v. *Hathaway,*77 Ind. 14; *Campbell*v. *Frankem,*65 Ind. 591.

The evidence is not in the record and we can not consider the question whether the damages were excessive.

Judgment affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
        reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
        reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
        servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
        statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
        agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
        servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
        AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc., as subservicer, Nelnet Servicing, LLC, as successor subservicer to
        Great Lakes Education Loan Services, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, C. E. Rick Strattan,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 10, 2007


/s/ C. E. Rick Strattan
-------------------------------
C. E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer