alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# General Pulaski Memorial Day, 2010 

From before our Nation’s founding until today, daring individuals have fought to defend America with unwavering devotion.  Casimir Pulaski was a Polish patriot, yet he laid down his life in defense of American independence during the Revolutionary War.  Each year, on October 11, Americans pause to remember this champion of liberty who fought valiantly for the freedom of Poland and the United States, and we proudly reflect upon our rich Polish-American heritage.

As a young man, Brigadier General Casimir Pulaski witnessed the occupation of Poland by foreign troops and fought for his homeland’s freedom, determined to resist subjugation.  During his subsequent exile to France, he learned of our nascent struggle for independence, and volunteered his service to our cause.  Pulaski arrived in America in 1777 and served in the American Cavalry under the command of General George Washington.  Valued for his vast military experience, General Pulaski led colonists on horseback with admirable skill, earning a reputation as the “father of American Cavalry.”  Pulaski was mortally wounded during the siege of Savannah, and he died from his wounds on October 11, 1779.

General Pulaski’s legacy survives in a long line of proud Polish Americans, who have arrived on our shores seeking freedom and opportunity and have served in our Armed Forces to defend our Nation.  Polish Americans have carried with them values and traditions that have shaped our society, and their immeasurable contributions have strengthened our country.  This proud community has been integral to our success as a Nation, and will play a prominent leadership role in the years ahead.

General Pulaski wrote to our first President, “I came here, where freedom is being defended, to serve it, and to live or die for it.”  We have never forgotten his sacrifice for our independence or his patriotism in defending freedom across two continents.  Today, the people of the United States and Poland are bound by our solemn obligations to each other’s security and our shared values, including a deep and abiding commitment to liberty, democracy, and human rights.  On General Pulaski Memorial Day, we celebrate the early beginnings of our strong friendship, our lasting ties to the people of Poland, and our enduring commitment to a safer, freer, and more prosperous world.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Monday, October 11, 2010, as General Pulaski Memorial Day.  I encourage all Americans to commemorate this occasion with appropriate programs and activities paying tribute to Casimir Pulaski and honoring all those who defend the freedom of our great Nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2010-25968

Billing code 3195-W1-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,893
<INVENTORY>                                        488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,150
<PP&E>                                         145,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,868
<BONDS>                                        119,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,023
<SALES>                                         31,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,625
<CGS>                                           38,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffery C. Walraven, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of the registrant, MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: April 10, 2017 |   | By:    | /s/ Jeffery C. Walraven                         |
|----------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Jeffery C. Walraven                                  |
|                 |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 35.4

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

CGCMT 2014-GC23

The undersigned, David Co, a
Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Custodian (a Certifying Servicer) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2014 (the Agreement), by and among, Citigroup Commercial
Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, Citibank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.08 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
as Custodian/s/ David CoBY:

David CoTitle:

DirectorDate:

March 1, 2016
585 A.2d 389

#### THOMAS CROWE v. M & M/MARS AND SPARTAN DESIGN INCORPORATED.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 242 *N.J.Super.*592, 577 A.2d 1278)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Leonard George Mitchell, Appellant

No. 06-20-00047-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 49,299-

B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the judgment of the trial court by deleting 

the assessment of $1,190.00 in attorney fees. We also delete the entry of $1,190.00 for 

“Attorney Fee” in the certified bill of costs and revise the entry for “Total Costs” to $330.00. As 

modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Leonard George Mitchell, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 20, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
##### 



BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/James A. WhiteName:
    
    James A. WhiteTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005,which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c). 

 

Dated: November 14, 2005
Exhibit 4.403

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 176558 dated December 31, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

intrazonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 31, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 28, 2019 No. 516-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP3 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the
manager of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. III (the
Partnership), certify that:                                                                                  
|
| | (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period
ended September 30, 2002 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Partnership.                                                                                    
|

/s/ Patrick L. Beach
Patrick L. Beach
President
GP3 Asset Acquisition, LLC
November 14, 2002
Dear BoardWith all due respect, I humbly propose the following changes to the proposed 

regulation:

Section 1201.4(s) defines the term “nonfrivolous allegation.” The word 

“nonfrivolous” is anachronistic, confusing, and an insidious double-negative. A 

generally accepted dictionary definition of “frivolous” is “not serious.” 

Therefore, the word “nonfrivolous” means “not not serious.” The Board should 

take this opportunity to continue its movement toward plain English in its 

regulations and replace the word “nonfrivolous” with the more easily understood 

word that means exactly the same thing: “serious.” These regulations are often 

used by non-attorney employees and lay union representatives. They should be 

written so that they are especially easy to understand. There is no reason for 

using the word “nonfrivolous” as it adds no unique or specialized meaning 

beyond the more common word “serious.”

The rewritten section should read as follows:

(s) Nonfrivolous (serious) allegation. A nonfrivolous allegation means an 

allegation that is “serious.” A serious allegation is an assertion that, if proven, 

could establish the matter at issue. An allegation generally will be considered 

serious when [continuing as in the proposed change].

Additionally, 1201.4(s)(1) would be more helpful to users if it contained an 

example of “more than conclusory.” The concept of “conclusory” is difficult to 

understand for many individuals who would be using these regulations. For 

example, “I have been removed because of my age.” To some this statement 

would be conclusory; to others it would be a statement of fact. Adding an 

example of a conclusory statement and then in comparison an example that is 

“more than conclusory” would improve this regulation and make it more 

understandable. 

Best regardsBill

William B. Wiley, Attorney at Law

1180 Greenwich Street

San Francisco, CA 94109-1507
#### Parminder SINGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert MAGEE, individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Cecyle Andrews, individually and in her capacity as an employee of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Roberto Morales, individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; and Anthony Marian, individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-17345.

D.C. No. CV-94-4146 CAL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 13, 2000.*

Decided Jan. 12, 2001.

*714Before THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Parminder Singh (“Singh”) sued four Immigration and Naturalization Service officers alleging that they were personally liable for their actions in connection with Singh’s unlawful deportation. All defendants moved for summary judgment based on either qualified or quasi-judicial immunity. The district court agreed with defendants and entered judgment in their favor. Singh timely appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.1

We first address Marian’s and Morales’s claims of qualified immunity. In order for an official to be stripped of his or her qualified immunity, “the right the official is alleged to have violated must have been ‘clearly established’ [so that] ... [t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he [or she] is doing violates that right.” *Anderson v. Creighton,*483 U.S. 635, 640, 107 S.Ct. 3034, 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987). Singh has failed to present any authority, or any evidence, to support his contention that either Marian or Morales has violated any of his clearly established constitutional rights.

We now turn to Magee’s and Andrew’s claims of quasi-judicial immunity. Quasi-judicial immunity protects an officer who lawfully executes a valid court order. *See Coverdell v. Department of Soc. and Health Servs.,*834 F.2d 758, 764-65 (9th Cir.1987). Furthermore, “[a]n absolute immunity [defense] defeats a suit at the *715outset, so long as the official’s actions were within the scope of the immunity.” *See Imbler v. Pachtman,*424 U.S. 409, 419 n. 13, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976). The undisputed facts showed that the manner of execution of the deportation warrant and the status of the deportation order at the time of Singh’s placement in the aircraft entitled Magee and Andrews to absolute, quasi-judicial immunity.

Because the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on the basis of defendants’ qualified and quasi-judicial immunity, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. The parties are familiar with the facts and we do not repeat them here.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: October 25-26, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NIH/
NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, MD 
20817, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3bfbabdbbe293beb2babffdbdbabbfdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc90959294cdbc919d9590d2929594d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26068 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### REGINA M. GIARDINA v. GARDINER C. BENNETT.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification granted.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Lustros Inc(the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Zirk Engelbrecht, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

*/s/ Zirk Engelbrecht*

By: Zirk Engelbecht

Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: August 20, 2012

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.