alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Date: December 16, 2005                    By:       /s/ ZSOLT RUMY
      -----------------                       ---------------------------
                                                       Zsolt Rumy
                                                Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMA-
                          TION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
                          CONTAINED IN THE FOTOBALL USA, INC. FORM 10-QSB 
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS 
                          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   21,141
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3,009,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                             63,349   
<INVENTORY>                                           3,481,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      6,906,570
<PP&E>                                                2,423,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,319,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        8,091,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,331,058
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 26,992
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,582,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          8,091,103
<SALES>                                              12,462,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     12,462,847
<CGS>                                                 7,772,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,153,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       55,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         489,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                            195,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     294,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            294,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .11
                                               

</TABLE>
Motion Denied; Order filed January 8, 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00272

- CR

____________ JEREMY PATRICK SHAKE SNIDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- DCR

- 59007A



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Michael W. Elliott

. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due October 8, 2014

. We granted a total of 82 days extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief until December 29, 2014. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On December 31, 2014
,counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief.

Counsel did not allege any exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Michael W. Elliott to file a brief with the clerk of this
Court on or before January 29, 2015 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the Court will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the
trial court to conduct a hearin g to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DATA RACE,
INC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,495
<PP&E>                                           4,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,220
<COMMON>                                        24,905
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,544
<SALES>                                         16,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,271
<CGS>                                           12,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.25)
        

</TABLE>
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 501

- CR
ANDREW OLEVIA JONES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 338th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No

. 1 390646 )
The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 1 4 , 201 4 . After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that it has no jurisdiction over the appeal. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.
Judgment rendered April 14 , 201 5

. Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Justice s Keyes, Bland, and Massengale

. y
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Salary Council will meet on October 29, 2010, at the time and location shown below. The Council is an advisory body composed of representatives of Federal employee organizations and experts in the fields of labor relations and pay policy. The Council makes recommendations to the President's Pay Agent (the Secretary of Labor and the Directors of the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management) about the locality pay program for General Schedule employees under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code. The Council's recommendations cover the establishment or modification of locality pay areas, the coverage of salary surveys, the process of comparing Federal and non-Federal rates of pay, and the level of comparability payments that should be paid.

The October meeting will be devoted to reviewing the results of pay comparisons and formulating its recommendations to the President's Pay Agent on pay comparison methods, locality pay rates, and locality pay areas and boundaries for 2012. The meeting is open to the public. Please contact the Office of Personnel Management at the address shown below if you wish to submit testimony or present material to the Council at the meeting.

# DATES:

October 29, 2010, at 10 a.m.

*Location:*                         Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 5H17, Washington, DC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Charles D. Grimes, III, Deputy Associate Director, Employee Services, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H31, Washington, DC 20415-8200. Phone (202) 606-2838; FAX (202) 606-4264; or e-mail at                         *pay-performance-policy@opm.gov.*

For the President's Pay Agent.

John Berry,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-25829 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1010 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Air Force faces significant readiness challenges due to insufficient personnel levels, a shrinking and depleted aircraft fleet, and maintenance 

deferrals, all of which are affected by budgetary uncertainty and impede 

the Air Force’s ability to meet ongoing and unexpected national security 

threats, putting United States national security at risk. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2018 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. BACON, and Ms. CHENEY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Air Force faces significant readiness 

challenges due to insufficient personnel levels, a shrinking and depleted aircraft fleet, and maintenance deferrals, all of which are affected by budgetary uncertainty 

and impede the Air Force’s ability to meet ongoing and 

unexpected national security threats, putting United 

States national security at risk. 

Whereas according to Air Force Chief of Staff General David 

Goldfein, the United States Air Force is ‘‘the smallest 

we’ve ever been’’; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1010 IH 

Whereas according to an April 2018 report from the Government Accountability Office, more than a quarter of fighter pilot positions are unfilled; 

Whereas the Air Force has just 18,000 of the roughly 20,000 

pilots it needs to crew its 5,500 fighters, bombers, 

airlifters, cargo planes, and rescue helicopters; 

Whereas this 10 percent gap in its air crew requirement 

could, as Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson said 

in November of 2017, ‘‘break the force’’; 

Whereas almost 1⁄3 of the Air Force’s aircraft were not 

flyable, or mission-capable, at any given time in fiscal 

year 2017; 

Whereas over the last decade, the total number of aircraft in 

the Air Force has been on a downward slope; 

Whereas the total number of aircraft in the Air Force will 

drop again from fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2018; 

Whereas the average age of an aircraft, forcewide, increased 

from 24 years in fiscal year 2010 to 27.6 years in fiscal 

year 2017; and 

Whereas between fiscal years 2013 and 2017, accidents involving all Defense Department warplanes rose nearly 40 

percent: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States Air Force faces signifi4 cant readiness challenges due to aging aircraft and 

5 depleted personnel; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1010 IH 

1 (2) Congress must provide the Air Force reg2 ular and sufficient funding to address procurement, 

3 maintenance, and staffing shortfalls; and 

4 (3) without this funding, United States national 

5 security is at risk. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4966

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY MARCELLOUS STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR04-252-CCB)

Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 8, 2006

 

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Jeffrey E. Risberg, Assistant

Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.

Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Gregory Welsh, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Marcellous Stewart entered a conditional guilty

plea to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). He reserved the right

to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Following his

conviction, Stewart timely appealed, challenging the district

court’s denial of his motion to suppress.

On appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress, this

court reviews the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and

its factual findings for clear error. United States v. Jones, 356

F.3d 529, 533 (4th Cir. 2004). We review the facts in the light

most favorable to the party that prevailed below. Id.

Police officers discovered the incriminating evidence

after being given consent to enter Stewart’s home by a third party.

The government can justify a warrantless search by showing

permission to search by “a third party who possessed common

authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or

effects sought to be inspected.” United States v. Matlock, 415

U.S. 164, 171 (1974).

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and

conclude that the authority of the third party here was apparent

under the circumstances and the police acted reasonably in relying

on her consent. See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 186

(1990); United States v. Kinney, 953 F.2d 863, 866-67 (4th Cir.
- 3 -

1992). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying

Stewart’s motion to suppress.

Therefore, we affirm Stewart’s conviction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65029-65030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of November 13, 2010, Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date of the November 13, 2010, 
meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

DATES: The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on 
Saturday, November 13, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The

[[Page 65030]]

Commission will meet jointly with the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force.
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Somerset County 
Courthouse, Court Room <greek-i>1, located at 111 E. Union Street, 
Somerset, PA 15501.

Agenda

    The November 13, 2010, joint Commission and Task Force meeting will 
consist of:
    1. Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance.
    2. Review and Approval of Commission Minutes from August 7, 2010.
    3. Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and National Park 
Service.
    4. Old Business.
    5. New Business.
    6. Public Comments.
    7. Closing Remarks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, 
Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. 
814.443.4557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Any 
member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement 
concerning agenda items. Address all statements to: Flight 93 Advisory 
Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. Before including 
your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal 
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your 
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be 
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your 
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public 
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Joanne M. Hanley,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. 2010-26462 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
| | usbank (logo)                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                       
| | Global
                                 Corporate Trust

190
S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor

MK-IL-SL7C

Chicago,
IL 60603



usbank.com



Annual
Statement of Compliance

Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18



VIA:
EMAIL



Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585
Broadway

New
York, New York 10036

Attention:
Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



| | Re: | Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between
                                         Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
                                         as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge
                                         Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as the Trustee,
                                         Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer
hereby certify that:



(1) 
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) 
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 28, 2023





|U.S.
Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|                                                            
|
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nabors Red Lion Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Restrepo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/    WILLIAM RESTREPO |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | William Restrepo             |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*    |
|   | Date:   March 23, 2015  |

 

----