alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. McAlister, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tripos, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 6, 2004

 

     /s/ John P. McAlister

     John P. McAlister 

     Chief Executive Officer
585 A.2d 363

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRUCE BUCCOLO.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2155

_____________________________ S TEVEN M ERCER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. March 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and M AKAR and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Steven Mercer, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-7 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016                 
|                                     
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                
|Somsak Chivavibul                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Senior Securitization Officer)      
|Navient Funding, LLC
MEMORANDUM


TO:       James B. Gardner

FROM:     Carol J. Thouin, Corporate Secretary

DATE:     May 25, 1999

RE:       Notice of Extension of Employment Contract

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Home Federal Savings Bank
has reviewed your formal performance evaluation performed by
selected members of the Board. In connection therewith and
pursuant to Section 1 of your contract, on May 25, 1999, the
Board determined to extend your employment contract until the May
Board Meeting, 2002.

                              HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

                         By:  /s/ M.F. Schumann
                              ---------------------------
                              M.F. Schumann
                              Director

                     EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     I hereby acknowledge receipt of this notice of extension of
the above-referenced agreement and accept the extension of the
term of such agreement.

                              EMPLOYEE

Dated:   May 25, 1999              By: /s/ James B. Gardner
      ---------------------       --------------------------
                                   James B. Gardner
cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge 

Dwayne Preston Arndt 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
#### Nelson W. HAYWARD, Appellant, v. Irl E. DAY, Appellee.

No. 79-2055.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 1980.

Decided March 13, 1980.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 4, 1980.

Certiorari Denied May 27,1980.

See 100 S.Ct. 2951.

*717Nelson W. Hayward, filed brief pro se.

Ronald S. Reed, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Kenneth Josephson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., filed brief for appellee.

Before HEANEY, ROSS and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nelson W. Hayward, convicted by a jury in 1978 of four counts of failure to file an income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203,1 appeals the denial of his postconviction petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

In this pro se appeal Hayward contends: (1) An income tax on wages is illegal as a direct tax on the source of income; (2) he therefore had no duty to file an income tax return; (3) his failure to file could not have been willful; and (4) the district court erred in denying the petition without a hearing.

These claims are frivolous. Congress clearly intended to tax income regardless of the source. *See Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.,*240 U.S. 1, 18, 36 S.Ct. 236, 241, 60 L.Ed. 493 (1916); *United States v. Francisco,*614 F.2d 617 at 619 (8th Cir. 1980). The fact that Hayward’s failure to file was motivated by his belief that the tax is unconstitutional is no defense. *See United States v. Douglass,*476 F.2d 260, 263 (5th Cir. 1973). Moreover, evidence of Hayward’s prior taxpaying history and his involvement in the tax protest movement was sufficient to establish he was aware of his legal obligation and intentionally chose not to comply. *See United States v. Francisco, supra,*614 F.2d at 618.

Because the files and records conclusively establish Hayward is entitled to no relief, the district court did not err in denying his petition without a hearing. *See Lindhorst v. United States,*585 F.2d 361, 366 (8th Cir. 1978).

This appeal is dismissed as frivolous. *See*8th CIR. R. 9(a).

1

. Hayward’s conviction was affirmed by this court in an unpublished opinion, United States v. *Hayward,*603 F.2d 221 (8th Cir. 1978*).*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                              572,010
<SECURITIES>                         94,991
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,320,039
<ALLOWANCES>                         12,000
<INVENTORY>                       3,630,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  8,355,353
<PP&E>                              417,286
<DEPRECIATION>                      194,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    9,832,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               114,706
<BONDS>                           2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                             834
<COMMON>                                135
<OTHER-SE>                        7,688,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      9,832,849
<SALES>                           2,344,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,344,537
<CGS>                             1,376,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,376,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   58,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (266,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (85,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (181,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (181,016)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 96-60624

_____________________________________

PATRICK A. BOYLE,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, ET AL.,

Respondents.

______________________________________________________

Petition for Review of Final Order

of Benefits Review Board

(94-2641)

______________________________________________________

May 7, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal from an order of the Benefits Review Board, the

employee challenges the ALJ's finding (which was affirmed without

decision by the Benefits Review Board) that suitable alternate

employment was available to the employee. The ALJ found that the

employer had demonstrated that several jobs were available to Mr.

Boyle which he was capable of performing that would allow him to

earn more than he was earning at his 29-hour per week job with
2

Hobby Hut. One of these jobs was in newspaper sales in the New

Orleans area. It paid $7.10 an hour for a 29-hour week and would

yield Mr. Boyle $205.90 per week. 

Mr. Boyle argues that the ALJ erred in concluding that he

would receive $205.90 per week from the newspaper job because this

job required him to use his personal automobile and the ALJ's

computation did not consider automobile expenses. However, the

employee did not present evidence that automobile expenses are not

reimbursed. The only evidence on this point was from the

rehabilitation counselor who testified that she assumed these

expenses were reimbursed but had made no specific investigation of

this point. We are persuaded that the ALJ was entitled to infer

from this expert's testimony that ordinarily, in employment of this

type, the employer reimburses the employee's automobile expenses.

So regardless of which party had the burden of proof on this issue,

substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding.

AFFIRMED.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000706

31-AUG-2018

08:18 AM
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNEST JESSE HAWKS.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 214 *N.J.Super.*430)
584 A.2d 246

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES BAKER.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005718 13-FEB-2014 09:17 AM
584 A.2d 243

#### ALLEN FEINGOLD AND ALF LIMITED v. ROMAN ZIOLKOWSKI.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Janie S. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated October 6, 2004 |  | /s/ Janie S. Brown     
|                      |  | Janie S. Brown         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Ronald E. Hermance, Jr., is the chief executive officer of
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), and Denis J. Salamone, is the
principal financial officer of the Company. This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company
of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 (the Report). By execution of this statement, we certify that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)), and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
Report. Date: August 6, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 6, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Denis J. SalamoneDenis J. SalamoneSenior Executive Vice President andChief Operating Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT


OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF


INTERNET SCIENCES, INC.


 


The undersigned, being the Chairman and Director
(the "Board of Directors") of Internet Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby adopts,
pursuant to the By-Laws of the Corporation and the applicable laws of the State of Delaware, the following resolutions on behalf of the
Corporation:


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
deems it in the best interest of the Corporation to appoint Christopher Morris to serve as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Managing
Director of the Corporation.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that Christopher Morris is hereby appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Managing Director of the Corporation, effective September
13, 2021; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that
the officers of the Corporation are, and each acting alone is, hereby authorized to do and perform any and all such acts, including execution
of any and all documents and certificates, as said officers shall deem necessary or advisable, to carry out the purposes of the foregoing
resolutions; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that
any actions taken by such officers prior to the date of the foregoing resolutions adopted hereby that are within the authority conferred
thereby are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved as the acts and deeds of the Corporation.


 


This Action by Written Consent shall be filed
in the Minute Book of the Corporation and become a part of the records of the Corporation as of the date first appearing above. This Action
by Written Consent may be signed electronically, by counterpart, and by fax.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Action by Written Consent as of the date first written above.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Action by Written Consent on the 8th of December 2021.


 


 


	 	/s/ Lynda Chervil        	 
	 	Lynda Chervil, Director
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Henry KATZ, Appellant.

No. 14687.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1964.

Decided May 19, 1964.

H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Samuel J. Reich, Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Gustave Diamond, U. S. Atty., David G. Hill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Western District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

„ Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of wilfully failing to pay the special tax for en*423gaging in the business of accepting wagers (26 U.S.C. § 7203). At the trial there was substantial uncontradicted testimony of admissions by defendant that he was operating a numbers lottery during the periods covered by the two counts of the information. And there was proper and ample corroboration of those admissions which “at least circumstantially suggests that the facts admitted are true.” United States v. Baker, 293 F.2d 613, 616-617 (3 Cir. 1961), cert. den. 368 U.S. 914, 82 S.Ct. 195, 7 L.Ed.2d 132. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84, 90, 75 S.Ct. 158, 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147, 75 S.Ct. 194, 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954). The defense did not offer any evidence at the trial.

Appellant’s other points are de miniinis’

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L UI S MANU E L C OE L HO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72115 A ge nc yN o. A 030- 816- 201 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L ui s M anue l C oe l ho, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of P ortuga l , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rr e je c tin g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w and r e m and. 

# FI LED APR22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72115 2 T he B I A r e

j e c t e d C oe l ho’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n w i thoutthe be ne f i tof our de c i s i on i n R ey es -T

orres v . H

older , N o s . 0 8 - 7 4 4 5 2 & 0 9 - 7 0 2 1 4 , 2 0 1 1 WL 13 12 57 0 (9th C i r. A pri l 7, 20 11 ) ( m andat e pendi ng ), i n w hi ch w e c on clud ed that 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( d) di d notappl yt o pr e c l ude am ot i on t o r e ope n f i l e d a f t e rthe p e titio n e rh a db e e n r e m o v e d . See R ey es -T orres , 2011 W L 1312570, a t*2- *3 ( c i t i ng C oyt

v. H older , 5 9 3 F .3 d9 0 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ) . W e r e m an dto th e B I A in l i g h to f th i s i n t e rv e n i n g c a s e l aw. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
Exhibit 32.1

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David M. Kirk, Chief Executive Officer and President of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to
be executed this 14th day of January, 2011.



/s/ David M. KirkName: David M. KirkTitle: Chief Executive Officer and President


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.