alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         918,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,637,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,770,983
<PP&E>                                       5,145,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,179,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,024,474
<BONDS>                                        756,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,235
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,351,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,179,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,913,954
<CGS>                                          243,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,570,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-3, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2016and ending onFebruary 28, 2017and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 19th day of May, 2017 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 10.9

                      Summary of Approved Changes to the
                     Blue Cross  -- Primary License Agreement
<TABLE>
   <C>            <C>           <C>
      Action        Effective                               Explanation
                      Date

   Replace the    March 10,      Revisions to Exhibit A of Exhibit 1:
   entire         2000
   Exhibit 1                     -    Amended Standard 6 (C) - Added Electronic Claims Routing
   with the new                    Process ("ECRP") as a required National Program.
   Exhibit 1.
                                 -    Amended Standard 9 - Added Electronic Claims Routing Process
                                   ("ECRP") as a required National Program.

                  June 16, 2000  Revisions to Exhibit A of Exhibit 1:

                                 -    Amended Standard 6(I) - Eliminated the Annual Financial
                                   Forecast.

                                 -    Amended Standard 7(B) - Eliminated the Annual Financial
                                   Forecast.

                  N/A            Revisions to Exhibit A of Exhibit 1:

                                 Amended Standards 6(I)- eliminated reporting requirements that
                                 have sunset.
   Replace the    March 10,      Revisions to Exhibit 2:
   entire         2000
   Exhibit 2                     Amended Standard 5 - Added Electronic Claims Routing Process
   with the new                  ("ECRP") as a required National Program.
   Exhibit 2.

                  June 16, 2000  Revisions to Exhibit 2:

                                 Amended Standard 2 - Replaced the Annual Financial Forecast
                                 Required Report filed by Plans and Larger Affiliate Licensees with
                                 a new streamlined, Combined Annual Forecast Required Report that
                                 is filed only by the Primary Licensees.

                  N/A            Revisions to Exhibit 2:

                                 Amended Standard 2- eliminated reporting requirements that have
                                 sunset.

   Replace 8c of  June 16, 2000  Amendments to Paragraph 19c; Exhibit 1 - Paragraph 14A; Exhibit 1A
   the and the                   - Paragraph 9A:
   entire
   Exhibits1 and                 -    Revised double three-quarter voting requirement
   1A
</TABLE>
November 10, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SANDS L. STIEFER, CHIEF APPRAISER OF THE HARRIS COUNTY 

APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00617-CV V.

EDWARD MOERS AND DANIEL MOERS, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the order denying appellant, Sands L. Stiefer’s, 

plea to the jurisdiction and motion to dismiss, signed, July 9, 2014, was heard on 

the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error. We 

therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER

judgment dismissing for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction all claims asserted by 

appellees against appellant, Sands L. Stiefer.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Edward Moers and Daniel Moers.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Order entered January 16 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01029
- CR COREY LEE HOBBS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F09
- 59386
- R



### O RDER On December 3, 2014, this Court ordered the trial court to prepare and file a certification of appellant’s right to appeal within fifteen days. To date, we have not received the certification of appellant’s right to appeal as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Additionally, appellant’s brief is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file with this Court, within TEN
DAYS of the date of this order, a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.We DIRECT the Cl erk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Honorable Jennifer Bennett, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; Riann Moore, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; and the Dalla s County District Attorney’s Office.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH Z. TAYLOR.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8533

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CURTIS D. DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:99-cr-00055-JBF-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis D. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Curtis D. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006), and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v.

Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered its order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on October 8, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on November 24, 2008. 1 Because Davis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of

1 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

23 the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal of the district court’s order denying Davis’ § 3582 motion. 2 Turning to the order denying Davis’ motion for reconsideration, we have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. According, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Davis , No. 4:99-cr-00055-JBF-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART

2 Davis’ motion for reconsideration was filed on November 10, 2008, more than ten days after the district court entered its order denying his § 3582 motion, and therefore did not toll the running of the time to file a notice of appeal. United States v. Christy , 3 F.3d 765, 767 n.1 (4th Cir. 1993).
585 A.2d 386

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES OGLESBY.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 4.430

 

THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

 

(THE BANK OF RUSSIA)

 

LICENSE

 

OF A PROFESSIONAL PARTICIPANT OF THE SECURITIES MARKET

 

No. 177-046113-100000 dated 24 January 2001

 

for carrying out broker activity

 

This License is granted to MTS Bank Public Joint-Stock Company (MTS Bank PJSC)

 

Location: Moscow

 

OGRN: 1027739053704

 

TIN: 7702045051

 

Validity: unlimited

 

Authorities issued the license: Federal Commission for the Securities Market of Russia

 

 

	
Deputy Chairman of the Bank of   Russia
    	
/signature/ V.V. Chistyukhin
    


 

[Round seal of the Bank of Russia]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1067 

Recognizing suicide as a public health problem and expressing support for 

designation of September as ‘‘National Suicide Prevention Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. KATKO (for himself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, and Mr. BEYER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing suicide as a public health problem and expressing support for designation of September as ‘‘National 

Suicide Prevention Month’’. 

Whereas suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the 

United States and the second leading cause of death 

among individuals between the ages of 10 to 34; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC), one person dies by suicide every 11.7 

minutes, resulting in nearly 45,000 deaths each year in 

the United States; 

Whereas suicide is the only leading cause of death in the 

United States that has increased every year for the past 

decade; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1067 IH 

Whereas it is estimated that there are over 1,300,000 suicide 

attempts each year; 

Whereas suicide is preventable, as 9 out of 10 suicide attempt survivors do not go on to die by suicide; 

Whereas according to the CDC, suicide results in an estimated $44,600,000,000 in combined medical and work 

loss costs nationally; 

Whereas the stigma associated with mental health conditions 

and suicidality works against suicide prevention by discouraging persons at risk for suicide from seeking lifesaving help and further traumatizes survivors of suicide 

loss and people with lived experience of suicide; and 

Whereas September would be an appropriate month to designate as ‘‘National Suicide Prevention Month’’ which 

overlaps World Suicide Prevention Day, September 10, 

recognized internationally and supported by the World 

Health Organization: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes suicide as a preventable national 

3 and State public health problem; 

4 (2) supports the designation of ‘‘National Sui5 cide Prevention Month’’; 

6 (3) supports declaring that suicide prevention 

7 should be a priority; 

8 (4) acknowledges that no single suicide preven9 tion program or effort will be appropriate for all 

10 populations or communities; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1067 IH 

1 (5) promotes awareness that there is no single 

2 cause for suicide, and that suicide is most often an 

3 impulsive act that occurs during a moment of over4 whelming hopelessness and despair; and 

5 (6) develops and implements strategies to in6 crease access to quality mental health, substance 

7 abuse, and suicide prevention services. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OJO TRUCKING CORPORATION AND YARDVILLE SUPPLY COMPANY.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification granted. (See 217 *N.J.Super.*307).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7360 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7360

To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services from operating 
    unlicensed temporary emergency shelters for unaccompanied alien 
                               children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2018

  Ms. Judy Chu of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services from operating 
    unlicensed temporary emergency shelters for unaccompanied alien 
                               children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shut Down Child Prison Camps Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINED TERM.

    In this Act, the term ``temporary emergency shelter'' means an 
unlicensed care provider facility that provides temporary emergency 
shelter and services for unaccompanied alien children when licensed 
facilities are near or at capacity.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SHELTERS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall not maintain or 
operate (directly or through a contract) any temporary emergency 
shelter, including the temporary emergency shelter in Tornillo, Texas, 
and the temporary emergency shelter in Homestead, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1051 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1051

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 6, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, United States 
Code, to clarify the definition of ``crime of violence'', and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The 
bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 
bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
September 13, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend 
the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 
matter for consideration pursuant to this section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 106

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

    Mr. Nunes (for himself and Mr. Schiff) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $12,100,000 for the One 
Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,050,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2017, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2018; and
            (2) not more than $6,050,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2018, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2019.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Transition Report of OneLife Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KT/A for the transition period from May 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Robert Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: October 18, 2018By:/s/ Robert WagnerRobert WagnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
NUMBER 13-08-00255-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MICHAEL REECE, Appellant,

v.

NCO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

of Collin County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The parties to this appeal have filed an agreed motion to vacate the judgment of the

trial court and remand this matter to the trial court for further action consistent with the

agreement of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). 
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to

vacate and remand, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. The

agreed motion is GRANTED. We set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with

the agreement of the parties. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(d). Costs will be taxed against

appellant. See TEX. R.APP.P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 29th day of May, 2008.