alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1823 PAUL YONGO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN; RHONDA HOGGE, AIC; NATIONWIDE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J. CATER GLASS; LATONYA MICHELE MCNEIL; HAROLD C. RHUDY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00094) Submitted: November 2, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee Simpson, III, LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE L. SIMPSON, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E. Thompson, III, BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGGS & THOMPSON, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Paul Yongo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his appeal of the magistrate judge’s order denying various non-dispositive motions in Yongo’s civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Yongo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts at government expense, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2019

No. 04-19-00439-CV

IN RE James Clinton COYLE, Janice Presley Coyle a/k/a Janice Presley and Cody Presley

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On June 28, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which relators requested 

a stay of “any and all enforcement.” After considering the petition, this court concludes relators 

are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The request for a stay is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on July 17, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of July, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-12-24620-CV, styled Coyle Family Farm, Inc., et al. v. James Clinton 

Coyle, et al., pending in the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales 

presiding.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold B. Gilkey, Chief Executive Officer of Sterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Harold B. Gilkey                           
|                      |  |     |  | Harold B. Gilkey                               
|                      |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterling and will be retained by Sterling and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission upon request.
#### RICHARD BROWN AND ERNEST KING v. CITY OF NEWARK.

November 2, 1987.

Cross-petition for certification granted.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
         Studies
	 About & Contact
			 Latest Publications
		 Newsletters
		 Reports
		
Research Briefs

 	
Search Studies
Surveys of Federal Employees
  Search and Site Index Reports
	MSPB has the statutory responsibility to conduct objective, non-partisan studies that assess and evaluate Federal merit systems policies, operations, and practices. Findings and recommendations from these studies are issued through formal reports to the President and Congress. The reports below contain analyses, findings,  and recommendations related to merit and the effective management of the  Federal workforce.
	abstract
                docname
		
                Title
				Dateabstract
                docname
		
                Title
				Date


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DrugMax, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2003 (the Report), I, Ronald J. Patrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
    The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



/s/     Ronald J. PatrickRonald J. PatrickChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerFebruary 14, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2150
TYRONE ANDREWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. M. DAW, in his individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-602-5-BO) Submitted: January 19, 2001 Decided: February 9, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Reuben Franklin Young, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Andrews v. Daw , No. CA-97-602-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a)
AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Henry R. MandellHenry R. MandellChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.390

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS,

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 174356 dated October 01, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

intrazonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 

(Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 01, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 23, 2019 No. 298-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         457,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               66,735,983
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,754,984)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            65,438,325
<PP&E>                                       1,852,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,220,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       50,507,191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,472
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,677,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,220,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,614,167
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               145,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,650,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,988,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                   725,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,262,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1459 

CA 12-00265 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION

OF CATHERINE H., DAUGHTER,

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 ORDER

FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN OF THE 

PERSON AND/OR PROPERTY OF DOLORES H., A 

PERSON ALLEGED TO BE INCAPACITATED.

---------------------------------------- 

SUSAN H., APPELLANT. 

SUSAN H., APPELLANT PRO SE. 

CHRIS T. BRUNEA, BOWMANSVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A.

Sedita, Jr., J.), entered April 7, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to

Mental Hygiene Law article 81. The order, among other things, granted

the cross motion of Catherine H. for referral of all accounting issues

to Surrogate’s Court, Erie County. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.2



RF MONOLITHICS, INC.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of July 2003.



/s/    HARLEY E BARNES IIIName:

Harley E Barnes IIITitle:

Chief Financial Officer




*A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.