63800 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices 

for the sampling frame includes: (1) 50 

State agriculture department 

representatives, (2) 50 State department 

of education representatives, (3) 50 State 

cooperative extension representatives, 

(4) up to 50 State Farm to School 

coordinators, and (5) up to 1,000 local 

Farm to School coordinators. Ninety 

percent of each group is expected to 

respond. Estimates of the percentages of 

respondents who will agree to complete 

the interview are based on previous 

experience with developing the 

currently available database of farm to 

school initiatives. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 20 for State-level 

respondents, 10 for local-level 

respondents. Estimated responses per 

respondent are as follows: Up to 200 

State officials will be asked to identify 

local school districts which participate 

in Farm to School activities and provide 

contact information. An average of 20 

school districts per respondent will be 

identified. An estimated 1,000 school 

districts will be contacted to obtain 

information on 10 key characteristics. 

(Note: identified school districts will 

overlap, so that redundant phone 

information serves as validation). 

Estimated Total Responses: 14,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: We 

estimate the time per response as 0.05 

hours (3 minutes) for State-level 

respondents to provide contact 

information for each school district 

within the state, and 0.25 hours (15 

minutes) per question for local-level 

respondents to provide information on 

each key characteristic, on average. 

These estimates of respondent burden 

are based on experience with previous 

data collection efforts for Farm to 

School initiatives. 

Estimated Total Burden on 

Respondents: 2,700 hours. See the table 

below for the estimated total annual 

burden for each instrument. 

REPORTING BURDEN

Description 

Estimated 

number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total annual 

responses 

Estimated 

average 

number of 

hours per 

response 

Estimated 

total annual 

hours of 

response 

burden 

Request for programs in the state ....................................... 200 20 4,000 .05 200 

Key Characteristics .............................................................. 1,000 10 10,000 .25 2,500 

Total responding burden ............................................... 1,200 ........................ 14,000 ........................ 2,700 

Dated: September 15, 2010. 

Katherine R. Smith, 

Administrator, Economic Research Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26083 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Information Collection; Commercial 

Use of the Woodsy Owl Symbol 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Forest Service is seeking comments 

from all interested individuals and 

organizations on the currently approved 

information collection, Commercial Use 

of the Woodsy Owl Symbol. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

writing on or before December 17, 2010 

to be assured of consideration. 

Comments received after that date will 

be considered to the extent practicable. 

ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this 

notice should be addressed to the Forest 

Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 

Office of the Conservation Education 

Program, Program Manager National 

Symbols, 1400 Independence Avenue, 

SW., Mail Stop 1147, Washington, DC 

20250–1147. 

Comments also may be submitted via 

e-mail to ivelez@fs.fed.us. The public 

may inspect comments received at the 

Office of Conservation Education 

Program, Room 1C, U.S. Forest Service, 

Yates Building, 201 14th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC. Visitors are urged to 

call ahead to 202–205–5681 to facilitate 

entrance into the building. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Iris 

Velez, Program Manager National 

Symbols, Office of Conservation 

Education Program, at 202–205–5681. 

Individuals who use telecommunication 

devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the 

Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800– 

877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., 

Eastern Standard Time, Monday 

through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Commercial Use of the Woodsy 

Owl Symbol. 

OMB Number: 0596–0087. 

Expiration Date of Approval: 

04/30/2011. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: The Woodsy Owl-Smokey 

Bear Act of 1974 established the 

Woodsy Owl symbol and slogan, 

authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture 

to manage the use of the slogan and 

symbol, authorizes the licensing of the 

symbol for commercial use, and 

provides for continued protection of the 

symbol. Part 272 of Title 36 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations authorizes the 

Chief of the Forest Service to approve 

commercial use of the Woodsy Owl 

symbol and to collect royalty fees. 

Commercial use includes replicating 

Woodsy Owl symbol or logo on items, 

such as tee shirts, mugs, pins, figurines, 

ornaments, stickers, and toys and using 

the image and or slogan of the icon in 

motion pictures, documentaries, 

television magazine stories, and books, 

magazines, and other for-profit paper 

products. 

Woodsy Owl is America’s symbol for 

the conservation of the environment. 

The public service campaign slogans 

associated with Woodsy Owl are ‘‘Give 

a Hoot, Don’t Pollute’’ and ‘‘Lend a 

Hand, Care for the Land.’’ The mission 

statement of the Woodsy Owl’s 

conservation campaign is to help young 

children discover the natural world and 

join in life-long actions to care for that 

world. 

The USDA Forest Service National 

Symbols Program Manager will use the 

collected information to determine if the 

applicant will receive a license or 

renewal of an existing license and the 

associated royalty fees. Information 

collected includes, but is not limited to, 

tenure of business or non-profit 

organization, current or planned 

products, physical location, projected 

sales volume, and marketing plans. 

Licensees submit quarterly reports, 

which include: 

1. A list of each item sold with the 

Woodsy Owl symbol. 

2. Projected sales of each item. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices 63801 

1The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 

730–774 (2010). 

2 50 U.S.C. app. sections 2401–2420 (2000). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 

17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has 

been extended by successive Presidential Notices, 

the most recent being that of August 12, 2010 (75 

FR 50,681 (Aug. 16, 2010)), has continued the 

Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 

et seq. (2000)). 

3. The sales price of each item. 

4. Total sales subject to Forest Service 

royalty fee. 

5. Royalty fee due based on sales 

quantity and price. 

6. Description and itemization of 

deductions (such as fees waived or 

previously paid as part of advance 

royalty payment). 

7. The new total royalty fee the 

business or organization must pay after 

deductions. 

8. The running total amount of 

royalties accrued in that fiscal year. 

9. The typed name and signature of 

the business or organizational employee 

certifying the truth of the report. 

Data gathered in this information 

collection are not available from other 

sources. 

Estimate of Annual Burden: 30 

minutes per responses. 

Type of Respondents: Individuals, forprofit businesses and non-profit 

organizations. 

Estimated Annual Number of 

Respondents: 15. 

Estimated Annual Number of 

Responses per Respondent: 5. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 37.5 hours. 

Comment Is Invited: Comment is 

invited on: (1) Whether this collection 

of information is necessary for the stated 

purposes and the proper performance of 

the functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical or scientific utility; (2) the 

accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including the use of 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology. 

All comments received in response to 

this notice, including names and 

addresses when provided, will be a 

matter of public record. Comments will 

be summarized and included in the 

submission request toward Office of 

Management and Budget approval. 

Dated: October 12, 2010. 

Robin L. Thompson, 

Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private 

Forestry. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26165 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Joseph Piquet and Related Person 

Alphatronx, Inc. 

In the Matter of: Joseph Piquet, 76067–004, 

currently incarcerated at FCI Miami, Federal 

Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 779800, 

Miami, FL 33177, and 1258 SW. Maplewood 

Dr., Port St. Lucie, FL 34986, Respondent, 

Alphatronx, Inc., 1258 SW. Maplewood 

Drive, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986, Related 

Person. 

Order Making Order Denying Export 

Privileges of Joseph Piquet Applicable 

to Related Person Alphatronx, Inc. 

Pursuant to Sections 766.25(h) and 

766.23 of the Export Administration 

Regulations 1 (‘‘EAR’’), the Bureau of 

Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. 

Department of Commerce, through its 

Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’), 

has requested that I make the Denial 

Order that was imposed against the 

individual Joseph Piquet (‘‘Piquet’’) on 

May 28, 2010 (75 FR 32742, June 9, 

2010) applicable to Alphatronx, Inc. 

(‘‘Alphatronx’’), 1258 SW. Maplewood 

Dr., Port St. Lucie, FL, 34986, 

(hereinafter, the ‘‘Related Person’’), as a 

person related to Piquet. 

Section 766.23 of the EAR provides 

that ‘‘[i]n order to prevent evasion, 

certain types of orders under this part 

may be made applicable not only to the 

respondent, but also to other persons 

then or thereafter related to the 

respondent by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business. Orders that may be made 

applicable to related persons include 

those that deny or affect export 

privileges * * *.’’ 15 CFR 766.23(a). 

On May 28, 2010, I issued an Order 

pursuant to Section 11(h) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. 

sections 2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’) 2 and 

Section 766.25 of the EAR denying the 

export privileges under the Regulations 

of Piquet for 10 years. The Order was 

based on Piquet’s conviction of violating 

the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. 

(2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’) and Section 38 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

2778 (2000)). Piquet was convicted 

based on his role in a conspiracy to 

purchase high-tech military and dualuse electronic components from a 

domestic corporation and to then ship 

the items from the United States to 

Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of 

China without first obtaining the 

required export licenses. Among the 

commodities involved in this 

conspiracy were high power amplifiers 

designed for use by the U.S. military in 

early warning radar and missile target 

acquisition systems, and low noise 

amplifiers that have both commercial 

and military use. 

BIS has presented evidence that 

indicates that Alphatronx is related to 

Piquet by ownership, control, position 

of responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business, and that it is necessary to add 

this entity to the Piquet Denial Order in 

order to avoid evasion of that Order. 

The basis for naming Alphatronx to the 

Piquet Denial Order is that Piquet is the 

owner and President of Alphatronx and 

that Piquet made the decisions to utilize 

his company Alphatronx to carry out 

the conspiracy and subsequent 

violations of the AECA and IEEPA. 

As provided in Section 766.23 of the 

EAR, I gave notice to Alphatronx that its 

export privileges under the EAR could 

be denied for up to 10 years due to its 

relationship with Piquet and that BIS 

believes naming Alphatronx as a related 

party to Piquet would be necessary to 

prevent evasion of a denial order 

imposed against Piquet. In providing 

such notice, I gave Alphatronx an 

opportunity to oppose its addition to the 

Piquet Denial Order as a related party. 

Having received no submission, I have 

decided, following consultations with 

BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, 

including its Director, to name 

Alphatronx as a Related Person to the 

Piquet Denial Order, thereby denying 

Alphatronx export privileges for 10 

years from the date of Piquet’s 

conviction. 

I have also decided to revoke all 

licenses issued pursuant to the Act or 

EAR in which Alphatronx had an 

interest at the time of Piquet’s 

conviction. The 10-year denial period 

will end on May 14, 2019. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, that having been provided 

notice and opportunity for comment as 

provided in Sections 766.25 and 766.23 

of the Export Administration 

Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’), the 

following entity, Alphatronx, Inc., with 

a last known address at 1258 SW. 

Maplewood Dr., Port St. Lucie, FL, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES