alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Henry R. Mandell certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005/s/ Henry R. MandellHenry R. Mandell
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-3
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party The Bank of New York Mellon.



Date: June 10, 2015



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|of American Honda Finance Corporation                | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

jlf/Inventory

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MERCEDES AYALA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71869

Agency No. A075-659-690

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, AND TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Mercedes Ayala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming the immigration

judge's denial of his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
jlf/Inventory 2 08-71869

1252. We review for substantial evidence, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d

738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel reversal of the IJ's conclusion that petitioner

failed to establish that the harm he suffered at the hands of gang members in El

Salvador was on account of a protected ground. See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563

F.3d 855, 858-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (concluding that resistance to gang activity is not

a particular social group for the purpose of establishing nexus to a protected

ground). Accordingly, petitioner's asylum claim fails. Id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DEOTEXIS
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS 
QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,034,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,036,261
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,036,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          223,884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,547
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,807,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,036,261
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,971
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               438,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (416,159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (416,159)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,291]


Modine Manufacturing Company Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From Securitas, Aerotek and Accountemps, Pemberville, Ohio; Amended 
Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of 
Revised Determination on Reconsideration on July 30, 2010. The Notice 
of revised determination was published in the Federal Register on 
August 13, 2010 (75 FR 49538).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
revised determination applicable to workers and former workers of 
Modine Manufacturing Company, Pemberville, Ohio (subject firm). The 
workers are engaged in employment related to the production of 
radiators and service parts.
    The company reports that workers leased from Securitas, Aerotek, 
and Accountemps were employed on-site at the Pemberville, Ohio location 
of Modine Manufacturing Company. The Department has determined that 
these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm 
to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Securitas, Aerotek, and 
Accountemps working on-site at the Pemberville, Ohio location of Modine 
Manufacturing Company.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,291 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Modine Manufacturing Company, including on-site 
leased workers from Securitas, Aerotek, and Accountemps, 
Pemberville, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after June 12, 2008, through July 30, 2012, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26015 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
exh101-20211105_sgillett






DocuSign Envelope ID: DEE87372-BB93-4BB1-82D4-1225C5F89AAD EXHIBIT 10.1 





 






DocuSign Envelope ID: DEE87372-BB93-4BB1-82D4-1225C5F89AAD 





 






DocuSign Envelope ID: DEE87372-BB93-4BB1-82D4-1225C5F89AAD
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
	  Data
	    AI Inventory
   
    Search & Site Index Data

	Per M-19-23, Tristan Leavitt, MSPB's General Counsel/Acting Chief Executive and Administrative Officer, designated William Spencer as MSPB's Chief Data Officer.


 Members of MSPB's Data Governance Body (DGB):*

 

Chief Data Officer (Chairman, DGB)

General Counsel

Director, Office of Appeals Counsel

Director, Office of Regional Operations

Clerk of the Board

Director, Office of Policy & Evaluation

Performance Improvement Officer

Chief Information Officer

Chief Financial Officer

* These roles are represented by the positions above:

Chief FOIA Officer

Senior Agency Official for Privacy

Senior Agency Official for Records Management  MSPB Data Governance Body Charter


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Transition Report of OneLife Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KT/A for the transition period from May 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Robert Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: October 26, 2018By:/s/ Robert WagnerRobert WagnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 «Grant_Date» Company «Name» Grantee Plan
   Grant «M___of_Shares» Stock «Grant_Date» Date of Grant
 Vesting
 (i)
    
    so long as the Grantee is employed with the Company:
 (A)
    
    [one-third of the Restricted Stock Units shall
vest on «Vest_Date_1»];(B)
    
    [an additional one-third of the Restricted
Stock Units shall vest on «Vest_Date_2»];(C)
    
    [the remaining one-third of the Restricted
Stock Units shall vest on «Vest_Date_3»];
 (ii)
    
    in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, as defined
under the Plan;(iii)
    
    in the event of the involuntary termination of the service of
the Grantee for any reason other than Cause, in which case the date of
termination will be deemed to be the date the Grantee is given notice of such
termination; or




---



##### 



(iv)
    
    the Committee so directs.
 Share Delivery
 Rights of Stockholder
 Recapitalizations, Dividends and Adjustments
 Nontransferability
 Withholding
 References
 Notice
 2




---



##### 



If to the Company:
    
    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Attn: Chief Financial Officer
 If to the Grantee:
    
    «Name»«Address1», «Address2»«Country»
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
 Data Privacy Use Data Data Recipients
 3




---



##### 



«Grant_Date»
 FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.By:
  GRANTEEBy:«Name»Date:
 4
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21 - 2094
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD

- FALTAS , Plaintiff

- Appellant , v. WAL

- MART STORES EAST, L.P.; HEWLETT

- PACKARD COMPANY, “HP , ” Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten , Senior District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 03563

- TLW )
Submitted : November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Marie Therese Assa’ad

- Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Regina Hollins Lewis, Randi Lynn Roberts, GAFFNEYLEWIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WIL LCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2094 Doc: 37 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Marie Therese Assa’ad

- Faltas appeals the district court’s order s (1) accepting the magistrate judge’s recomme ndation to deny Assa’ad

- Faltas’ summary judgment motion and grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Assa’ad

- Faltas’ state law civil claims ; and (2) denying Assa’ad

- Faltas’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

. We have reviewed the record and find no reve rsible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s orders

. See Assa’ad

- Faltas v. Wal

- Mart Stores E., L.P. , No
. 3:18

- cv - 03563

- TLW ( D. S .C
. filed June 1, 2021 & entered June 2, 2021; Sept. 28, 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2094 Doc: 37 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,363
<SECURITIES>                                     6,992
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (281)
<INVENTORY>                                     28,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,908
<PP&E>                                          90,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,265)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,505
<BONDS>                                          5,443
<COMMON>                                           161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,905
<SALES>                                         34,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,873
<CGS>                                           26,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Goergen,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date: December 16,  2004         |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Robert B. Goergen                 |   |
| Robert B. Goergen                     |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----