alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,513)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,805
<PP&E>                                          85,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,933)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,015
<BONDS>                                        270,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           82,526
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,529
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,796
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,376)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,052)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)


</TABLE>
The Hon. William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2165

___________ Willis Hampton, * * Appellant, * * On Appeal from the v. * United States District Court * for the Eastern District * of Arkansas. Amtran Corporation, * * [Not to be Published] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 1997 Filed: October 17, 1997

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Will is Hampton appeals from the District Court's adverse grant of summary 1 judgme nt in his action against Amtran Corporation, asserting federal employmen t discrimination claims and pendent state claims. Upon review of the record and the-2- - parties' submissions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons set for th in the District Court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 35.2  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Operating Advisor,
Citibank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC23 (CGCMT
2014-GC23) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein
certifies to the following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018
through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by: /s/ Adam
Singer





Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6609

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HAROLD DEAN RIVERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-77-8, CA-95-328-R)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Dean Rivers, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We also deny Appellant's motion requesting hand-written

copies of the court reporter's notes.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Rivers, Nos. CR-77-8; CA-95-328-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 18, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. *

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 863 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.863

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                                 An Act

 
  To facilitate the addition of park administration at the Coltsville 
            National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO COLTSVILLE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK DONATION 
SITE.
    Section 3032(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 113-291 (16 U.S.C. 410qqq) is 
amended by striking ``East Armory'' and inserting ``Colt Armory 
Complex''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFRED B. WEBER.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      14,563,436
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,994,044
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            23,790,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 49,082,714
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    237,916,141
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,899,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             343,462,611
<DEPOSITS>                                 292,847,070
<SHORT-TERM>                                15,069,960
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,036,955
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,146,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,393,465
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,455,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             343,462,611
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,755,728
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,200,057
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               421,184
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            18,376,969
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,372,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,566,776
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,810,193
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  615,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (3,982)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,831,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,374,722
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,374,722
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,789,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,367,316
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,899,474
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### STAMATIS GOLFINOPOULOS v. MICHAEL PADULA AND PRISCILLA G. WILSON.

October 13, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 218 *N.J.Super.*38).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,501,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  810,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    980,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,596,557
<PP&E>                                       1,562,120
<DEPRECIATION>                               (590,812)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,681,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          807,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,853
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,348,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,681,492
<SALES>                                      1,211,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,211,267
<CGS>                                          218,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,382,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (783,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (783,810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (783,810)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard Thompson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Freshpet, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015; and

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2016

/s/  Richard Thompson      _

Richard Thompson

Chief Executive Officer
#### FIRST GENERAL SERVICES OF the SOUTH, INC. v. PREFERRED CONTINUUM CARE-NEW ORLEANS, LP, et al.

No. 2011-CC-2385.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re First General Services of the South Inc.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 2008-4361; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-1170.

Denied.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1007 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that not fully resourcing 

the United States Army in a timely manner erodes the Army’s ability 

to maintain readiness and poses risk to the Army’s ability to conduct 

military operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2018 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. COOK, Mr. HUDSON, Ms. MCSALLY, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. BACON, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. 

KELLY of Mississippi, Mrs. ROBY, and Mr. WITTMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

not fully resourcing the United States Army in a timely 

manner erodes the Army’s ability to maintain readiness 

and poses risk to the Army’s ability to conduct military 

operations. 

Whereas, in previous years, the United States Army delayed 

supply transactions, and later had to order parts from 

sources outside the Department of Defense supply system 

and pay more to get parts fabricated or shipped quickly 

to keep up with maintenance timelines; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1007 IH 

Whereas, in previous years, the Army was forced to restrict 

to home station training due to not having enough resources; 

Whereas the Army, if not fully resourced, will postpone all 

noncritical maintenance work orders until later in the 

year when resourced correctly; 

Whereas the Army is attempting to add military personnel to 

meet critical skill gaps, and if not fully resourced, will 

delay the recruitment of new personnel which will result 

in units continuing to lack the full complement of personnel needed to be 100-percent effective; 

Whereas, if not fully resourced, noncritical travel, which includes relocating soldiers’ families (change of duty station) will be postponed and may result in missed school 

year timing for dependent spouses and their children; 

Whereas United States Army Forces Command is responsible 

for the training, mobilization, deployment, sustainment, 

and transformation of conventional forces to provide relevant and ready land power to combatant commanders; 

Whereas global threats require the Army to prepare to fight 

both terrorist organizations as well as possible near-peer 

adversaries; and 

Whereas it takes both significant time and resources to build 

a professional Army: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) finds that not resourcing the Department of 

3 the Army in a timely manner erodes readiness and 

4 puts the United States Army at a disadvantage; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1007 IH 

1 (2) affirms that Congress should resource all 

2 our warfighters prior to the beginning of a new fis3 cal year. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Removal of Listed Property

    Pursuant to section 60.15 of 36 CFR Part 60, comments are being 
accepted on the following properties being considered for removal from 
the National Register of Historic Places. Comments may be forwarded by 
United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 
20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 
20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be 
submitted by October 28, 2010.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

    Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resource:

PENNSYLVANIA

Schuykill County

Mount Pleasant Historic District, TR 881, Mt. Pleasant, 87002211.

[FR Doc. 2010-25753 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Great Western Bancorp, Inc. (the “ Company ”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), I, Ken Karels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 12, 2014





By: /s/ Ken Karels


Name:    Ken Karels


Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6751 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOELL A. LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,

District Judge. (3:03-cr-00151-3; 3:07-cv-00099)

Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joell A. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Joell A. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 768 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 768

  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP code for Miami Lakes, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

 Mr. Diaz-Balart introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP code for Miami Lakes, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA.

    Not later than September 30, 2017, the United States Postal Service 
shall designate a single, unique ZIP code for, as nearly as 
practicable, for Miami Lakes, Florida.
                                 <all>
```