alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT      TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14 UNDER**

**THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE      ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

| 1.   | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain                  any untrue                  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary                  to                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which                  such                  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period                  covered by                  this quarterly report; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other                  financial                  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all                  material                  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash                  flows of                  the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly                  report; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY MICHELICHE, JR.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL WARREN.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                                    
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,322,423
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,356,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191,834
<INVENTORY>                                      1,192,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,881,832
<PP&E>                                          11,052,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,152,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,121,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,600,232
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,316
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,633,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,121,500
<SALES>                                        150,434,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,434,054
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,988,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (979,149)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0                 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 661,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,762,798 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,762,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,762,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,762,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .86                                           
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, C. E.  Rick
Strattan,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2007


/s/ C. E. Rick Strattan
-------------------------------
C. E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20680

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ELEONEL MORALES SANTOS, also known as Eleonel Santos-Moralez, also

known as Eleonel Morales Santos, also known as Eleonel Santos Moralez,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-294-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pursuant to his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry by a previously

deported alien after an aggravated-felony conviction, Eleonel Morales Santos

received a sentence, inter alia, of 64 months’ imprisonment. He contends the

district court erred in applying a 16-level crime-of-violence enhancement under

Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on his 2004 Michigan conviction for criminal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 29, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20680 Document: 00512324124 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/29/2013
No. 12-20680

sexual conduct in the third degree. According to Santos, and as he asserted in

district court, his Michigan offense should not be considered a crime of violence

because the statute under which he was convicted does not comport with the

“generic, contemporary meaning” of statutory rape or sexual abuse of a minor

due to its lack of an age-differential requirement between defendant and

complainant. E.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 559 (5th Cir. 2013)

(en banc), (applying “generic, contemporary meaning” test to determine whether

offense qualifies as crime of violence). 

Although post-Booker, the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory only, and

a properly-preserved objection to an ultimate sentence is reviewed for

reasonableness under an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court must

still properly calculate the Guideline-sentencing range for use in deciding the

sentence to impose. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In that

respect, for issues preserved in district court, its application of the Guidelines is

reviewed de novo; its factual findings, only for clear error. E.g., United States v.

Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Villegas,

404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Morales’ contention is foreclosed by our court’s en-banc decision in

Rodriguez, rendered after briefing was complete for this appeal. Our en-banc

court concluded the generic, contemporary “definitions of ‘sexual abuse of a

minor’ in legal and other well-accepted dictionaries do not include such an agedifferential requirement”. 711 F.3d at 562 n.28. 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-20680 Document: 00512324124 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/29/2013
Mr. Spencer:

We submit this comment in response to the Federal Register Notice, Vol, 78, No. 

217, in which the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) solicited public input 

concerning options to revise its regulations governing how jurisdiction is 

established over appeals. 

Of the four options developed by the MSPB Regulations Working Group, we 

believe that Option B is the best proposal for two reasons. First, it clarifies the 

burdens of proof on appellants and agencies concerning both jurisdiction and 

merits issues for each type of MSPB appeal. Second, it adds a clear definition of 

“non-frivolous allegation” that will apply to individual right of action (IRA) 

appeals under the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), appeals under the 

Veterans Employment Opportunities Act (VEOA), and appeals under the 

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). 

In our opinion, Option D has the least merit of the four options developed by the 

MSPB Regulations Working Group because it does not include appropriate 

mechanisms to eliminate unmeritorious claims before a full-blown hearing. In 

this regard, Option D explicitly states that jurisdictional requirements relating to 

the merits in certain types of appeals (including but not limited to IRA appeals, 

VEOA appeals, and USERRA appeals) need not be established with “nonfrivolous allegations.” Moreover, Option D does not include a summary 

judgment procedure, unlike Option C. Accordingly, Option D likely would cause 

agencies to expend more resources on litigating unmeritorious claims, which 

otherwise could be disposed of at the jurisdiction stage before discovery or at a 

new summary judgment stage after discovery but before a hearing.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the MSPB’s proposals.

Best regards,

Maria C. Campo

Senior Counsel for Employment Litigation

Office of the General Counsel

United States Patent and Trademark Office
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 23 - 00439 - CR JOAQUIN AVALOS , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 100th District Court

Hall County, Texas Trial Court No . 4017 , Honorable Dale A. Rabe , Presiding



### January 29 , 202 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Joaquin Avalos, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s purported “judgment rendered against him in this case.” The trial court clerk , however, has notified this Court that Appellant’s criminal case ha s yet to proceed to trial. Because no pronouncement of sentence or appealable order has been entered by the trial court, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. 1 See Thompson v. State, 108 S.W.3d 287 , 290

1 By letter of December 21, 2023, we directed Appellant’s counsel to show how this Court has jurisdiction over th e appeal by January 4, 2024. Appellant’s counsel did not respon d to our letter and has2

(Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that there is no “conviction” to appeal before a sentence is rendered); Saunders v. State , No. 07 - 23 - 00237 - CR, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 5410, at *1 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo July 25, 2023, no pet .) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing premature appeal, where sentencing had yet to occur, for want of jurisdiction). Accordingly, th is appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam Do not publish.

had no further communication with this Court to date. T he trial court clerk has since re af firmed that Appellant’s case is still pending and no judgment has been entere d.
Exhibit 4.1


 





 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


April 24, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2010


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2010 (the
“Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-236191 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby
authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 		Alex R. Meitzner
	 		Senior Vice President
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: May 7, 2014                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   /s/ Kyle Hartley                            |   |
| Kyle Hartley                                            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |   |

----
# Vicksburg District reopens dam road at Arkabutla Lake

**VICKSBURG, Miss. -- **
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Vicksburg District has reopened the road over Arkabutla Dam at Arkabutla Lake, located in Tate and DeSoto counties in north Mississippi.

The road was recently closed for the installation of new piezometers on the top of the dam. The road along the dam’s base was also closed July 19 due to the discovery of a non-threatening sinkhole, and will remain closed until repairs are complete.

The road across the top of the dam will remain open for approximately two weeks until crews resume installation of piezometers on the top side of the dam. The new piezometers will measure groundwater elevations, pore water pressures and other key metrics.

Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid and Grenada lakes, the four Mississippi flood control reservoirs in the Vicksburg District’s area of responsibility, were authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936, which provided a plan designed to address flooding that originated in the Yazoo Basin. The four reservoirs are used to hold runoff, or excess rainwater, as a flood-prevention measure. With approximately 3.2 million visitors each year, the north Mississippi lakes also contribute approximately $82 million into the local economy.

The USACE Vicksburg District is engineering solutions to the nation’s toughest challenges. The Vicksburg District encompasses a 68,000-square-mile area across portions of Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana that holds seven major river basins and incorporates approximately 460 miles of mainline Mississippi River levees. The district is engaged in hundreds of projects and employs approximately 1,100 personnel.

XXX

Related News Release:Vicksburg District temporarily closes dam road at Arkabutla Lakehttps://www.mvk.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/2270072/vicksburg-district-temporarily-closes-dam-road-at-arkabutla-lake/

**Contact**

Release no. 20-057

Arkabutla Lake

Arkabutla Dam

road maintenance

piezometers
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq
Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan       
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer

July 13, 2011
#### WILL ROSS, INC., Appellant, v. PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 19089.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 10, 1964.

Ira Milton Jones, Milwaukee, Wis., John K. Ford, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Thomas P. Mahoney, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment holding invalid claim 2 of Polzin Patent No. 2,871,592, relating to an identification bracelet used principally on hospital patients. The patented device is described in the findings of the district court as follows:

> “Patent No. 2,871,592 discloses an identification bracelet which includes a band of flexible material having a row of apertures in one end and having an elongated pocket at its other end defined by a substantially rectangular window of transparent material. The end of the window is provided with a short flap and the female element of a snap fastener is secured to the flap while the male element of the snap fastener is secured to the end of the band.”

Referring particularly to prior art Polzin Patent No. 2,846,796, Gross Patent No. 2,111,664, Trilling Patent No. 2,738,-561, and unpatented identification bracelets manufactured by the defendant and by Hollister, Inc., the district court concluded that “the advance, if any, defined in claim 2 over the prior art would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art.”

We have examined the record and are satisfied that the district court’s conclusion is correct, and that the judgment therefore should be affirmed.
584 A.2d 213

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM RODENBAUGH.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD HAMMOND.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1007 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1007

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 25, 2018.
Whereas, in previous years, the United States Army delayed supply transactions, 
        and later had to order parts from sources outside the Department of 
        Defense supply system and pay more to get parts fabricated or shipped 
        quickly to keep up with maintenance timelines;
Whereas, in previous years, the Army was forced to restrict to home station 
        training due to not having enough resources;
Whereas the Army, if not fully resourced, will postpone all noncritical 
        maintenance work orders until later in the year when resourced 
        correctly;
Whereas the Army is attempting to add military personnel to meet critical skill 
        gaps, and if not fully resourced, will delay the recruitment of new 
        personnel which will result in units continuing to lack the full 
        complement of personnel needed to be 100-percent effective;
Whereas, if not fully resourced, noncritical travel, which includes relocating 
        soldiers' families (change of duty station) will be postponed and may 
        result in missed school year timing for dependent spouses and their 
        children;
Whereas United States Army Forces Command is responsible for the training, 
        mobilization, deployment, sustainment, and transformation of 
        conventional forces to provide relevant and ready land power to 
        combatant commanders;
Whereas global threats require the Army to prepare to fight both terrorist 
        organizations as well as possible near-peer adversaries; and
Whereas it takes both significant time and resources to build a professional 
        Army: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) finds that not resourcing the Department of the Army in a timely 
        manner erodes readiness and puts the United States Army at a 
        disadvantage; and
            (2) affirms that Congress should resource all our warfighters prior 
        to the beginning of a new fiscal year.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2007 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, C. E.
Rick  Strattan,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 13, 2007


/s/ C. E. Rick Strattan
-------------------------------
C. E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.388

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS,

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 173867 dated January 18, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

cable radio services

 

This License is granted to

 

Joint Stock Company

 

Research and production association «Progressivniye Technologii»

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 

(Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1025001631137

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

5013008091

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

7A, Amet-Khan Sultana str.,Zhukovsky, Moscow region, 140180

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until January 18, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated May 06, 2019 No. 266-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 


	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296