alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Atul Sabharwal, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Snipp Interactive Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   May 16, 2016





/s/  Atul Sabharwal

Atul Sabharwal,

Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2021

No. 04-20-00129-CV

Guangcun HUANG,

Appellant

v.

Linman CHANG,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-12481

Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Siting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On October 30, 2021, appellant filed a “First Amended Emergency 

Motion for Sanctioning and Immediate Recusal of Each and for All Three Justices 

on the Panel in this Case.” By order issued November 2, 2021, the en banc court 

denied appellant’s motion to recuse the panel. The remaining, unresolved portion 

of appellant’s motion sought sanctions against appellee because her motion to 

enter—and request for a hearing on that motion—was premature since the court 

of appeals had not yet issued a mandate in this case. 

On November 2, 2021, we ordered appellee to respond to appellant’s 

request for sanctions. Appellee filed her response on November 12, 2021. In her 

response, appellee “request[ed] that this Court allow the Motion to Enter be set 

for hearing.” She also requested an award of attorney’s fees. On November 12, 

2021, appellant replied to appellee’s response, and his reply also requested an 

award of attorney’s fees.

After consideration, we find that appellee’s motion to enter was 

premature. We have not yet issued our mandate in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P.

18. Our plenary power over this case deprives the trial court from taking any 
action in this case until our plenary power expires. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19; Saudi 

v. Brieven, 176 S.W.3d 108, 114 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. 

denied) (“Generally speaking, and with certain exceptions inapplicable here, once 

an appeal has been perfected and the trial court’s plenary power to perform 

certain acts after appeal has expired, the appellate court acquires exclusive 

plenary jurisdiction over the cause.”). 

Therefore, appellee’s request to permit further proceedings in the trial 

court is DENIED. 

While appellee’s filings below were premature, we conclude appellee did 

not undertake them in bad faith or for an improper purpose. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 

13; TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 10.004. Therefore, appellant’s request 

for sanctions is DENIED. 

Finally, both parties’ requests for attorney’s fees are DENIED.

It is so ORDERED November 23, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 **Trico Marine Services, Inc.**
 **Form 10-Q**
 **Quarterly Report**
 **Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005**
 
 
 
 **Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I, Joseph S. Compofelice, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: May 9, 2005
By: /s/ Joseph S. CompofeliceJoseph S. CompofeliceInterim Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I, Trevor Turbidy, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: May 9, 2005
By: /s/ Trevor TurbidyTrevor TurbidyVice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           536,288
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                 10,372,866
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                    7,786,435  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              19,751,942
<PP&E>                         5,072,792
<DEPRECIATION>                         0                   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                58,909,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         14,697,606
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          9,340,000
<PREFERRED>                       12,658
<COMMON>                          56,966
<OTHER-SE>                     1,139,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  58,909,768
<SALES>                       25,763,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              25,763,187
<CGS>                         18,369,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 18,369,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               6,531,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             1,301,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,495,171) 
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,495,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0 
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,495,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.32)

</TABLE>
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
   
  
 /s/ CHRISTIAN LOWN
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DrugMax, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jugal K. Taneja, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jugal K. TanejaJugal K. TanejaChief Executive OfficerSeptember 28, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-6 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016                 
|                                     
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                
|Somsak Chivavibul                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Senior Securitization Officer)      
|Navient Funding, LLC
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-1118-15 & PD-1119-15

PAUL ANTHONY GARCIA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

IN APPELLANT’S MOTIONS FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL

UNDER ARTICLE 44.04(h) V.A.C.C.P.

FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

A jury convicted appellant of injury to a child and intoxication manslaughter and

assessed punishment at confinement for 10 years and a fine of $10,000, probated, and 15

years, respectively. The Court of Appeals reversed the convictions and remanded the

cases to the trial court. Garcia v. State, Nos. 04-14-00389-CR & 04-14-00390 (Tex.

App.–San Antonio July 29, 2015). The State has filed petitions for discretionary review in
GARCIA PD-1118-15 & PD-1119-15 – 2

this Court.

Appellant has applied to this Court under Article 44.04(h) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, to set a reasonable bail pending final determination of the appeal.

Accordingly, bail is hereby set in the amount of $40,000 in each case, and it is

ORDERED that the trial court order Appellant released from confinement assessed in

these causes upon the posting of bail. Any sureties must be approved by the trial court.

The trial court shall determine and set conditions of bail.

IT IS SO ORDERED this the 8th day of February, 2016.

DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Fred Kurland, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
|               | /s/ Fred Kurland                                                       |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Fred Kurland                                                           |
| June 12, 2019 | Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

1

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CLIFTON JOEL BAYES.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 388

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NICHOLAS KRYIAZIS.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1683-1684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Application and Renewal Fees Imposed on Surety Companies and 
Reinsuring Companies; Increase in Fees Imposed

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Application and renewal fees imposed on surety companies and 
reinsuring companies; Increase in fees imposed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Effective December 31, 2009, The Department of the Treasury, 
Financial Management Service, is increasing the fees it imposes on and 
collects from surety companies and reinsuring companies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fees imposed and collected, as referred 
to in 31 CFR 223.22, cover the costs incurred by the Government for 
services performed relative to qualifying corporate sureties to write 
Federal business. These fees are determined in accordance with the 
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25, as amended. The change 
in fees is the result of a thorough analysis of costs associated with 
the Surety Bond Branch.
    The new fee rate schedule is as follows:
    (1) Examination of a company's application for a Certificate of 
Authority as an acceptable surety or as an acceptable reinsuring 
company on Federal bonds--$8,850.
    (2) Determination of a company's continued qualification for annual 
renewal of its Certificate of Authority--$5,200.
    (3) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an 
Admitted Reinsurer (except on excess risks running to the United 
States)--$3,125.
    (4) Determination of a company's continued qualification for annual 
renewal of its authority as an Admitted Reinsurer--$2,220.
    Questions concerning this notice should be directed to the Surety 
Bond Branch, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service, Department of the

[[Page 1684]]

Treasury, 3700 East West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782, 
Telephone (202) 874-6850.

    Dated: December 22, 2009.
David Rebich,
Assistant Commissioner for Management (CFO), Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-256 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: September 9, 2004               |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Robert B. Goergen                 |   |
| Robert B. Goergen                     |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----