alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
      Here's how you know **The .gov means it’s official.**
            
            Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
            
            The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Menu


close HomeAbout
    About the MSPB	
			Contacts & Locations
			Equal Employment Opportunity
			Information Quality Standards
			No FEAR Act
			Open.Gov
			Organization
			Plans, Budget & Performance
			Privacy Program
           Merit System Principles
	Prohibited Personnel Practices
	 Site Index and SearchAppeals
    Appeal Process
						Appellant Q&A
    Electronic Filing
    Forms
    Hearing Sites
    Policy & Resources
    Regulations
    Whistleblower Q&A 
	Electronic Filing  
	Mediation Appeals ProgramDecisions
    Case Reports
Nonprecedential Decisions
		Precedential DecisionsStudies & Publications
       About & Contact Studies
		Latest Publications
		Newsletters
		Reports
          Research Briefs
		Search StudiesSurveys of Federal Employees Public & Information Services
    Accessibility
		   Contracting & Procurement
			  Federal Register Notices
		      FOIA Program
				 e-FOIA Reading Room
        Submit a FOIA Request
           FOIA Reports 
			Information Collections
			Jobs & Internships
	Press Releases & News
	Privacy Program
				Regulations
			    Technical Support Search small
Search




Home
       Appeal Process
    Appellant Q&A
      Electronic Filing
      Forms
      Hearing Sites
		Mediation Appeals Program
		Policy & Resources
     		Regulations
     Whistleblower Q&ASearch and Site Index MSPB Appeal Forms
	
MSPB Initial Appeal Form 185 (Revised 09/23)Designation of Representative (Revised 09/23)
	Agreement to Mediation Form


Return to top


About MSPB
			  Accessibility
           Budget and Performance
          FOIA
          Info Quality Standards
          No FEAR Act
    
          Office of the Inspector General
          Privacy Program   
           Technical Support       USA.gov
		OSC.gov
				 Vote.gov


U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
 Agency Contact Center (202) 653-7200
          mspb@mspb.gov
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 1, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before November 
12, 2010 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: 1506-0036.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Title: Imposition of Special Measure Against Commercial Bank of 
Syria, Including its Subsidiary, Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank, as a 
Financial Institution of Primary Money Laundering Concern.
    Description: This information will be used to verify compliance by 
financial institutions with the requirements to notify their 
correspondent account holders.
    Affected Public: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 5,000 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Russell Stephenson (202) 354-6012, 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. 
Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183; (202) 354-6012.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25760 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven A. Gould,
M.D. Chief Executive Officer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Northfield Laboratories Inc.


Date: October 15, 2002


/s/ STEVEN A. GOULD, M.D.
-------------------------
Steven A. Gould, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

 

GEORGE STEWART, CPA

316 17TH AVENUE SOUTH

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144

(206) 328-8554 FAX(206) 328-0383

 

 

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

The firm of George Stewart, Certified Public Accountant consentsto the inclusion of our report on the Financial Statements of Bemax Inc. as of May 31, 2016, in any filings that are necessarynow or in the near future with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”in this registration statement.

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

 

/S/ George Stewart

 

George Stewart, CPA

 

 

 

September 15, 2017
Exhibit32.1

 

Certification Pursuant to18U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the annualReport of Bemax Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taiwo Aimasiko, Chief Executive Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 15, 2017

/s/ Taiwo Aimasiko

____________________________

Taiwo Aimasiko

Chief Executive Officer
#### PEARL RESES v. HARRY S. HOFFMAN.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 209

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL HARP.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7207]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``India's Fabled City: The Art of Courtly Lucknow''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``India's Fabled City: The Art of Courtly 
Lucknow,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about 
December 12, 2010, until on or about February 27, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural 
Affairs,Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-25748 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 11
                                EAGLE FINANCE CORP.
                                          
                        COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                 For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1998 and 1997
                                    (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                                 MARCH 31,
                                                  ---------------------------------------
                                                          1998             1997
                                                  ---------------        ---------

                                                  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S>                                                     <C>              <C>
Income data:
1.   Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . .    $  (1,476)       $  (1,508)
2.   Applicable income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .           --               --
                                                        ---------        ---------
3.   Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $  (1,476)       $  (1,508)
                                                        ---------        ---------
                                                        ---------        ---------

Number of outstanding shares:
4.   Weighted average common shares
     outstanding, adjusted for stock splits  . . . .        4,229            4,189
5.   Weighted average shares of treasury
     stock outstanding, adjusted for stock splits              --               --
6.   Weighted average shares reserved for stock
     options (utilizing the treasury stock method) .           --               --
7.   Common shares outstanding (Line 4-5+6). . . . .        4,229            4,189

Net income (loss) per share:
8.   Net income (loss) per common shares (Line 3/4).       ($0.35)          ($0.36)
9.   Fully diluted net income (loss) per common (Line 3/7) ($0.35)          ($0.36)

</TABLE>
Order entered October 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00113-CV

RICHARD A. MYERS AND THOMAS J. WOUTERS, Appellants

V.

BANK MIDWEST, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02904

ORDER

The Court has received a letter from the court reporter stating that there is no record of 

the October 29, 2012 hearing. The Court accordingly ORDERS appellants to file their brief 

within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: January 6, 2003





/s/    Mark R. HollingerMark R. Hollinger Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 1007 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 25, 2018. 

Whereas, in previous years, the United States Army delayed 

supply transactions, and later had to order parts from 

sources outside the Department of Defense supply system 

and pay more to get parts fabricated or shipped quickly 

to keep up with maintenance timelines; 

Whereas, in previous years, the Army was forced to restrict 

to home station training due to not having enough resources; 

Whereas the Army, if not fully resourced, will postpone all 

noncritical maintenance work orders until later in the 

year when resourced correctly; 

Whereas the Army is attempting to add military personnel to 

meet critical skill gaps, and if not fully resourced, will 

delay the recruitment of new personnel which will result 

in units continuing to lack the full complement of personnel needed to be 100-percent effective; 

Whereas, if not fully resourced, noncritical travel, which includes relocating soldiers’ families (change of duty station) will be postponed and may result in missed school 

year timing for dependent spouses and their children; 

Whereas United States Army Forces Command is responsible 

for the training, mobilization, deployment, sustainment, 
2 

•HRES 1007 EH 

and transformation of conventional forces to provide relevant and ready land power to combatant commanders; 

Whereas global threats require the Army to prepare to fight 

both terrorist organizations as well as possible near-peer 

adversaries; and 

Whereas it takes both significant time and resources to build 

a professional Army: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) finds that not resourcing the Department of the 

Army in a timely manner erodes readiness and puts the 

United States Army at a disadvantage; and 

(2) affirms that Congress should resource all our 

warfighters prior to the beginning of a new fiscal year. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc. (“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), that, to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 2, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ John W. McRoberts |
|---------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|                |   |   | John W. McRoberts          |
|                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

|   |   | By:    | /s/ Jeffery C. Walraven                                 |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Jeffery C. Walraven                                          |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  |
Exhibit
8.1



Kitov
Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd.



The
following table sets forth the name and jurisdiction of incorporation of our subsidiaries as of the date hereof.



|Name of Subsidiary          |  |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation | 
|--------------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------- | 
|                            |  |  |                              | 
|Kitov Pharmaceuticals Ltd.* |  |  | Israel                       | 
|                            |  |  |                              | 
|Tyrnovo Ltd.                |  |  | Israel                       | 



*On
April 25, 2017, the boards of directors of each of Kitov Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd. and Kitov Pharmaceuticals Ltd. approved
a merger between the two entities, with Kitov Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd.remaining as the surviving entity. For more information
on the proposed merger, see Item 4.C – Organizational Structure in the Annual Report for 2016 on Form 20-F in which this
is Exhibit is included.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTD Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, C.E. Rick Strattan,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 10, 2006


/s/ C.E. Rick Strattan
-------------------------------
C. E. RICK STRATTAN
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEANDRO DE JESUS and DIJALMA LEMOS,

Appellants,

v.

IN RE: TEREZA BECKER,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-490

[January 23, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. MH-C-18-3600.

Robin F. Hazel of Hazel Law, P.A., Hollywood, for appellants.

Beth Konken and Keturah A. Dunne, Associate General Counsel, 

Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., Patterson, NY, for 

appellants Leandro De Jesus and Dijalma Lemos Amicus Curiae.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
584 A.2d 219

#### AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND CHARLES SERRAINO, ETC. ET AL.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

MANUEL ALEJANDRO RONDON

PETITION OF: STEPHEN HOBBS, SURETY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 407 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Is the written consent requirement of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5747.1(b)(2) triggered when the court’s revocation and forfeiture of a defendant’s bail was the result of a court error?

The Prothonotary is directed to provide a copy of this order to the Attorney General, who

is invited to participate in this appeal as amicus curiae

.
# Sitemap

#

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

## I

                - I am an independent contractor who is going to bid on a job at a surface mine site that will last approximately four months. What type of training do I need to provide to my employees?
                - I operate a small sand and gravel mine that has been closed for a year and a half. I would like to know if my training plan is still valid, and what type of training do I need to provide my employees before we commence work?
                - I worked as a miner about eight years ago and am thinking about going back to the mines. Am I still considered an "experienced miner"?
                - IDAHO
                - If a new rule isn't in the CFR, why isn't it? How can I get a copy?
                - If I'm assigned to respond to a FOIA request, do I have to keep track of the amount of time I spend on searching, copying, and reviewing the request? 
                - If there is a charge, do I have to notify the requestors before beginning to process the request?
                - If we deny a request, in part or in whole, and the requestor appeals the decision, what do I need to do with the appeal? 
                - ILLINOIS
                - In responding to a FOIA request, are there any MSHA records that I should not release?
                - INDIANA
                - Industry and MSHA Partnership Safety Material
                - Institute of Makers of Explosives
                - Instructions
                - Instructor Materials
                - Interlibrary Loan 
                - International Union of Operating Engineers
                - IOWA
                - Is the PREA/REA published in the Federal Register? 
                - Is the requester required to give a reason for a request? 
                - Is there a PREA/REA for every MSHA rulemaking?
                - Is there any way to speed up the PRA clearance request process?
584 A.2d 228

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KYLE SEARS.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00498-CV

Jessica Galvan

v.

RVOS Farm Mutual Insurance Company

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. S-23-5545CV-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 28, 2024