Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices 1381 

adaptation and mitigation strategies, 

including ways to integrate this 

information into existing 

complementary programs such as the 

Effective Utility Management and 

Climate Ready Estuaries Program; (2) 

Identify climate change-related tools, 

training, and products that address 

short-term and long-term needs of water 

and wastewater utility managers, 

decision makers, and engineers, 

including ways to integrate these tools 

and training into existing programs; and 

(3) Incorporate mechanisms to provide 

recognition or incentives that facilitate 

broad adoption of climate change 

adaptation and mitigation strategies by 

the water sector into existing EPA Office 

of Water recognition and awards 

programs or new recognition programs. 

Dated: January 6, 2010. 

Cynthia C. Dougherty, 

Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking 

Water. 

[FR Doc. 2010–264 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9101–8] 

Science Advisory Board Staff Office; 

Notification of a Public Teleconference 

of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory 

Committee (CASAC) Ozone Review 

Panel for the Reconsideration of the 

2008 NAAQS 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Science Advisory Board 

(SAB) Staff Office announces a public 

teleconference of the Clean Air 

Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) 

Ozone Review Panel for the 

Reconsideration of the 2008 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) to conduct a review of EPA’s 

proposed rule that reconsiders the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) for Ozone set in March 2008. 

DATES: The public teleconference will 

be held on Monday, January 25, 2010 

from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern Time). 

ADDRESSES: The public teleconference 

will be conducted by telephone only. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any 

member of the public who wants further 

information concerning the 

teleconference may contact Dr. Holly 

Stallworth, Designated Federal Officer 

(DFO), EPA Science Advisory Board 

(1400F), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460; via 

telephone/voice mail (202) 343–9867; 

fax (202) 233–0643; or e-mail at 

stallworth.holly@epa.gov. General 

information concerning the CASAC can 

be found on the EPA Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/casac. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The Clean Air Scientific 

Advisory Committee (CASAC) was 

established under section 109(d)(2) of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42 

U.S.C. 7409) as an independent 

scientific advisory committee. CASAC 

provides advice, information and 

recommendations on the scientific and 

technical aspects of air quality criteria 

and national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) under sections 108 

and 109 of the Act. The CASAC is a 

Federal Advisory Committee chartered 

under the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act (FACA), as amended, 5 U.S.C., App. 

The CASAC Panel on the Ozone 

NAAQS Reconsideration will comply 

with the provisions of FACA and all 

appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural 

policies. 

Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires 

that the Agency periodically review and 

revise, as appropriate, the air quality 

criteria and the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the six 

‘‘criteria’’ air pollutants, including 

ozone. 

From 2005 to 2008, the CASAC Ozone 

Review Panel conducted scientific 

reviews of EPA’s scientific assessments 

of the health and welfare effects of 

Ozone and other Photochemical 

Oxidants. This panel last met on March 

28, 2008 to provide comments on EPA’s 

Final Rule for the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone 

(73 FR 16436). CASAC advisory reports 

on this subject are available on the 

CASAC Web site at http:// 

yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/ 

WebProjectsbyTopicCASAC!OpenView 

under completed topics, specifically 

Ozone 2005–2008. 

On September 16, 2009, EPA 

Administrator Lisa Jackson announced 

her decision to reconsider the March 12, 

2008 primary and secondary Ozone 

NAAQS to ensure they are scientifically 

sound and protective of public health 

and the environment. Pursuant to this 

decision, EPA has proposed on January 

6, 2009 to set different primary and 

secondary standards than those set in 

2008 to provide requisite protection of 

public health and welfare, respectively 

(see http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ 

standards/ozone/s_o3_cr_fr.html). Since 

the proposed standards are based on the 

scientific record from the 2008 

rulemaking, including public comments 

and CASAC advice, EPA’s Office of Air 

and Radiation requested the former 

Ozone Review Panel to provide 

comments and advice on the proposed 

Ozone standards. Accordingly, the SAB 

Staff Office is reconvening the former 

Ozone Review Panel to provide advice 

on the proposed Ozone NAAQS. This 

panel is renamed ‘‘Ozone Review Panel 

for the Reconsideration of the 2008 

NAAQS.’’ The roster for this panel can 

be viewed at http://yosemite.epa.gov/ 

sab/sabproduct.nsf/WebCASAC/ 

CommitteesandMembership?

OpenDocument. The purpose of the 

January 25, 2010 teleconference is for 

this Panel for the Reconsideration of the 

2008 NAAQS to review EPA’s proposed 

rule. 

Technical Contacts: Any questions 

concerning EPA’s proposed rule for the 

NAAQS for Ozone should be directed to 

Ms. Susan Stone, Office of Air and 

Radiation (OAR) or by e-mail at (919) 

541–1146 or stone.susan@epa.gov. 

Availability of Meeting Materials: A 

meeting agenda and other materials for 

the meeting will be placed on the 

CASAC Web site on the page reserved 

for the January 25, 2010 teleconference, 

accessible through the calendar link on 

the blue navigation bar. The proposed 

rule is available at http://www.epa.gov/ 

ttn/naaqs/standards/ozone/s_o3

_cr_fr.html. 

Procedures for Providing Public Input: 

Interested members of the public may 

submit relevant written or oral 

information on the group conducting 

the review and the topics included in 

this advisory activity. Oral Statements: 

To be placed on the public speaker list 

for the January 25, 2010 teleconference, 

interested parties should notify Dr. 

Holly Stallworth, DFO, by e-mail no 

later than January 20, 2010. Individuals 

making oral statements will be limited 

to three minutes per speaker. Written 

Statements: Written statements for the 

January 25, 2010 teleconference should 

be received in the SAB Staff Office by 

January 20, 2010 so that the information 

may be made available to the CASAC 

Panel for its consideration prior to this 

meeting. Written statements should be 

supplied to the DFO in the following 

formats: one hard copy with original 

signature and one electronic copy via email (acceptable file format: Adobe 

Acrobat PDF, MS Word, WordPerfect, 

MS PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in 

IBM–PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format). 

Submitters are asked to provide versions 

of each document submitted with and 

without signatures, because the SAB 

Staff Office does not publish documents 

with signatures on its Web sites. 

Accessibility: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1382 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices 

disabilities, please contact Dr. 

Stallworth at the phone number or 

e-mail address noted above, preferably 

at least ten days prior to the 

teleconference, to give EPA as much 

time as possible to process your request. 

Dated: January 5, 2010. 

Anthony F. Maciorowski, 

Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board 

Staff Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–261 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection, Comments Requested 

01/05/2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology and (e) ways to 

further reduce the information burden 

for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on 

this information collection should 

submit comments by March 12, 2010. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), via fax 

at (202) 395–5167, or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Cathy Williams, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC), 

445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 

20554. To submit your comments by email send then to: PRA@fcc.gov and to 

Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection send an e-mail to 

PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy Williams 

on (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0849. 

Title: Commercial Availability of 

Navigation Devices, CS Docket 97–80. 

Form Number: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 958 respondents; 529,510 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

0.00278 hours – 40 hours per response. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping and third party 

disclosure requirements; On occasion, 

quarterly, and semi–annual reporting 

requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in Sections 4(i), 303(r) and 

629 of the Communications Act of 1934, 

as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 44,173 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $137,550. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Needs and Uses: On March 17, 2005 

the FCC released a Second Report, In 

the Matter of Implementation of Section 

304 of the Telecommunications Act of 

1996, Commercial Availability of 

Navigation Devices, CS Docket No. 97– 

80, FCC 05–76. In the Second Report 

and Order and Further Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission 

extended by twelve months the existing 

2006 deadline in Section 76.1204(a)(1) 

prohibiting the deployment of 

integrated navigation devices by 

multichannel video programming 

distributors in order to promote the 

retail sale of non–integrated navigation 

devices. This extension was intended to 

afford cable operators additional time to 

investigate and develop a downloadable 

security solution that will allow 

common reliance by cable operators and 

consumer electronics manufacturers on 

an identical security function without 

the additional costs of physical 

separation inherent in the point–of– 

deployment module, or CableCARD, 

solution. The rules adopted in this 

proceeding added information 

collection requirements to this 

collection and also were intended to 

implement Section 629 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, 47 U.S.C. § 549. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of 

Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–230 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE: 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[WT Docket No. 08–165; DA 09–2629] 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 

Seeks Comment on Petition for 

Reconsideration or Clarification of the 

Commission’s Declaratory Ruling 

Clarifying Provisions in Section 

332(c)(7) of the Communications Act 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this document, comment is 

sought on a December 17, 2009 petition 

for reconsideration or clarification 

(Petition) filed by the National 

Association of Telecommunications 

Officers and Advisors, the United States 

Conference of Mayors, the National 

League of Cities, the National 

Association of Counties, and the 

American Planning Association 

(Petitioner). The Petitioner asks the 

Federal Communications Commission 

(Commission) to reconsider or clarify its 

interpretation of provisions in Section 

332(c)(7) of the Communications Act, as 

amended. 

DATES: Interested parties may file 

oppositions on or before January 22, 

2010, and replies on or before February 

8, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by WT Docket No. 08–165, by 

any of the following methods: (1) The 

Commission’s Electronic Comment 

Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal 

Government’s eRulemaking Portal, or (3) 

by filing paper copies. For detailed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES