alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 31, 2020

No. 04-20-00486-CR

Jemadari Chinua WILLIAMS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19-346

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief and a motion to compel 

the District Attorney to produce documents.

We grant appellant a thirty-day extension of time to file his brief and order appellant’s 

brief due February 20, 2021.

Appellant’s motion to compel the production of documents is denied. The materials 

appellant seeks, including the slides used during voir dire, were not offered or admitted into 

evidence at a hearing or the trial in this case, were not made part of a bill of exception, and are 

not part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.2, 34.1, 34.5, 34.6.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of December, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Edward C. Milligan, Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ EDWARD C. MILLIGAN          
|                       |  |     |  | Edward C. Milligan, Chairman and
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 12, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First State Associates, Inc., Hawarden, Iowa; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Farmers State Holding Company, Marion, 
South Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Farmers 
State Bank, Marion, South Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 14, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-26285 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THEODORE J. PRESTON.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARK BODGE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3995

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Harris 

v. State, 483 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON,JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62898-62899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25738]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

[[Page 62899]]

Extension:

    Rule 425; OMB Control No. 3235-0521; SEC File No. 270-462.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget the request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 425 (17 CFR 230.425) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) requires the filing of certain prospectuses and 
communications under Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) and Rule 165 (17 CFR 
230.165) in connection with business combination transactions. The 
purpose of the rule is to permit more oral and written communications 
with shareholders about tender offers, mergers and other business 
combination transactions on a more timely basis, so long as the written 
communications are filed on the date of first use. The information 
provided under Rule 425 is made available to the public upon request. 
Also, the information provided under Rule 425 is mandatory. 
Approximately 1,680 issuers file communications under Rule 425 at an 
estimated 0.25 hours per response for a total of 420 annual burden 
hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to: [email protected]; and (ii) Jeffrey Heslop, Acting Director/CIO, Office 
of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or 
send e-mail to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB 
within 30 days of this notice.

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25738 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Transition Report of OneLife Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KT/A for the transition period from May 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, John R. Muchnicki, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: October 18, 2018By:/s/ John R. MuchnickiJohn R. MuchnickiChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HERMAN WILLIAMS.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 407

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CURTIS JENKINS.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit
4.15


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (“Amendment”) is made as of the 30th day of June, 2021 by and between
Bonne Santé Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and the holder listed on the signature
page attached hereto (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed
to them in the Warrant (as defined below).


 


WHEREAS,
the Holder currently holds Warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 1,292,445 shares of common stock of the Company,
at an exercise price per share of $0.0001 per share, which is exercisable at any time during the period commencing on December 18, 2020
and ending on December 18 2025;


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Holder desire to change the exercise commencement date of the Warrant to January 31, 2022;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the undersigned parties hereby agree to amend the Warrant as follows:


 


		1.	The
                                            second sentence of the first paragraph of the Warrant shall be amended and restated in its
                                            entirety as follows:



 


“Each
Warrant entitles the Holder to purchase one share (collectively the “Warrant Shares”) of the common stock of the Company
(“Common Stock”) at an exercise price per share of $0.0001 per share (the “Exercise Price”) at any time during
the period commencing on January 31, 2022 and ending on December 18 2027 (the “Expiration Date”).”


 


		2.	Amended
                                            and Restated Warrant. Upon the request of the Holder and receipt by the Company of the original
                                            Warrant, the Company will provide the Holder with an Amended and Restated Warrant, reflecting
                                            the amendments described herein.



 


		3.	Full
                                            Force and Effect. Except as amended hereby, the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect
                                            in accordance with its original terms.



 


		4.	Governing
                                            Law. This Amendment is governed by the laws of the State of Florida.



 


Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank


 




     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Common Stock Purchase Warrant as of the date first written above.


 


	 	BONNE
    SANTE GROUP, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Alfonso J. Cervantes        
	 	Name:	Alfonso
    J. Cervantes
	 	Title:	Chairman
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	PEAH
    CAPITAL, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Jake Weiser   
	 	Name:
    	Jake
    Weiser 
	 	Title:	Authorized
    Signatory
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

July 16, 2007



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan        |  | 
|Chiu M. Chan            |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 

This certification is made solely pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for
any other purpose.
MSHA Impact Inspection List

(July 2023)

Mine Information x Type of Issuance x S&S Information x Issuances - Type of Action x Justifications

District State

Coal/

MNM Mine ID Controller Name Operator Name Mine Name

Citations

Orders

Safeguards (Coal only)

Total

S&S

Non-S&S

Total

S&S

Rate

104(a) Citation

104(b) Order

104(d)(1) Citation

104(d)(1) Order104(d)(2) Order

104(e)(2) Order

314(b) Safeguard

103(k) Order

104(g)(1) Order

103(j) Order

107(a) Order

Total

1. Operator Tactics

2. Hazard Complaints /Hotline Calls

3. Plan Compliance Issues

4. Inadequate Exams

5. Accidents, Injuries, Illnesses

6. Fatal Accidents

7. Enforcement History

8. Adverse Conditions

9. Respirable Dust Issues

10. Operational Changes

Barbourville KY C 1518361 Industrial Minerals Group LLC INMET Mining, LLC. D-21 14 0 2 16 2 12 14 14.29% 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 x x x

Beckley WV C 4609427 Sev.en Global Investments a.s. Rockwell Mining, LLC Eagle #3 Mine 18 0 0 18 4 14 18 22.22% 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 x x x

Birmingham AL C 0102901 Peabody Energy Corporation Peabody Southeast Mining, LLC Shoal Creek Mine 30 0 0 30 15 15 30 50.00% 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 x x x x

Dallas OK M 3401289 Buzzi Unicem S P A Buzzi Unicem USA LONE STAR PRYOR PLT MILL & QY 53 0 0 53 25 28 53 47.17% 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 x

Denver ID M 1000082 Americas Gold and Silver Corp U.S. Silver-Idaho, Inc. Galena 17 0 0 17 2 15 17 11.76% 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 x x

Duluth IA M 1300733 Elizabeth Noble; David F Reusswig Northern Filter Media, Inc Northern Filter Media Plant & Dredge 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0.00% 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 x x

Lakewood CO C 0503836 Peabody Energy Corporation Peabody Twentymile Mining LLC Foidel Creek Mine 33 1 0 34 5 29 34 14.71% 33 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 x x x x

Madisonville KY C 1519374 Alliance Resource Partners LP River View Coal LLC River View Mine 8 0 0 8 0 8 8 0.00% 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 x

Morgantown PA C 3605018 Iron Senergy Holding LLC Iron Cumberland LLC Cumberland Mine 15 0 0 15 4 11 15 26.67% 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 x x

Mount Pleasant PA C 3607230 CONSOL Energy Inc Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company LLC Bailey Mine 12 0 0 12 0 12 12 0.00% 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 x

Norton VA M 4604694 C K Meadows II Meadows Stone & Paving Inc Meadows Stone & Paving Incorporated 36 0 0 36 11 25 36 30.56% 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 x x x x x

Pineville WV C 4609533 Ramaco Resources Inc Ramaco Resources, LLC Berwind Deep Mine 14 0 2 16 3 11 14 21.43% 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 x x

Vacaville CA M 0400011 Taiheiyo Cement Corp CalPortland Oro Grande Quarry 8 0 0 8 4 4 8 50.00% 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 x x

Vacaville AK M 5001642 Northern Star Resources Ltd Northern Star (Pogo) LLC Pogo Mine 16 0 0 16 3 13 16 18.75% 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 x x x

Warrendale NY M 3001185 Augusta Group Company Empire State Mines LLC Empire State Mines 11 0 0 11 4 7 11 36.36% 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 x

Total Mines: 15 National Totals 287 1 4 292 82 206 288 28.47% 287 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 292 3 3 3 4 5 1 12 3 1 1

Last Updated 8/15/2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES DARREN TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:94-cr-00040-FDW-4)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Darren Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Darren Taylor appeals the district court’s order 

granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by 

not considering the current statutory sentence for Taylor’s 

offense. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th 

Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion 

of the district court”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
585 A.2d 346

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. W.G.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ANNA B. MILNE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD A. MILNE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DAVID S. WASSERMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 3, 1944

Decided November 30, 1944.

Before Jnsticos Parker and Come.

For the appellant, *Harold Heller.*

For the respondent, *Samuel Ehrenlcram (Harry S. Neiwhih,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Comb, J.

Edward A. Milne brought suit against David S. Wasserman on a state of demand alleging that the defendant let premises in Kearny. Yew Jersey, to him at a rental of $47.50 per month; that in accordance with the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, *U. S. G. A. App.,*§ 925 (e) the Price Administration fixed a maximum rent, effective July 1st, 1942, for the premises in question of $42.50 per month; that defendant, in violation of the statute and the regulation, demanded and received rent from May, 1942, through and including April, 1943, twelve months in all, at the sum of $47.50 per month, which was $5 per month in excess of the maximum legal rent. The damages demanded were $210, an amount not ascertainable on either alternative of the statute. An excess of $5 for twelve months amounts *286to $60 which multiplied by three would be $180. Based on the other alternative, a penalty of $50 for each overcharge, the amount would be $600 and hence beyond the monetary jurisdiction of the District Court.

It appears by the state of the case certified by the trial court, that:

“At the trial the plaintiff only demanded $50 for each overpayment of rent for the months of February, March and April, 1943.

“The court asked the plaintiff if he wished to amend the complaint to demand damages for the overpajonent of rent ■or otherwise; or for three times the excess paid. The plaintiff declined to amend the complaint and demanded $50 for each over-payment of rent.

“The proceedings were thereupon dismissed.”

Fo reason was given for the dismissal of the proceedings, nor do we perceive any reason therefor unless the District Court Judge was under the impression that the court lacked jurisdiction because the suit was for a penalty under federal statute. But in *Beasley*v. Gottlieb, 131 *N. J. L.*117, this court held that a suit such as the present was “of a civil nature, remedial of a private wrong and therefore not penal, a private suit for a private wrong; that the suit is within the limitations of the statutory jurisdiction of the District Courts.” That decision is in point, and of course a binding precedent. It follows that the judgment of dismissal must be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court to the end that the defendant may present such valid defense as he may have and if none be presented, that judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $150 with costs and such reasonable attorney’s fee as the court may determine.
EXHIBIT 11

                            IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                      August 31,         August 31,
                                                  ----------------    ----------------
                                                   1997      1996      1997      1996
                                                  ------    ------    ------    ------
<S>                                               <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>  
Primary and fully diluted earnings per share

     Weighted average number of issued shares
        outstanding                                4,734     4,734     4,734     4,734

Effect of:
     1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan                  --        --        --        --
     1994 Non-Employee Directors' Stock
        Option Plan                                 --        --        --        --
                                                  ------    ------    ------    ------
Shares outstanding used to compute primary and
    fully diluted earnings per share               4,734     4,734     4,734     4,734
                                                  ======    ======    ======    ======

Net Income                                        $  470    $  419    $1,239    $1,141
                                                  ======    ======    ======    ======

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share      $ 0.10    $ 0.09    $ 0.26    $ 0.24
                                                  ======    ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>

                                       11