alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 64315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, SPOTRIAS.
    Date: December 15, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference 
Call.)
    Contact Person: Richard D. Crosland, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529. 301-496-0635. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31635203000944715f58591f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8ba8bdad9d09da8868180c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 13, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26321 Filed 10-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 14,017.

#### Carter *v.*Gordon et al.

Stjpbeme *Cotjbt.*— Weight *of Evidence.*— Where there is evidence to support the finding the Supreme Court will not weigh the evidence to determine whether in its opinion the trial court rendered a proper conclusion supported by what the Supreme Court might conclude was a preponderance of the evidence.

Pleading.— *Written*Instrument.— *Cause of Action.*— Practice. — Where a plaintiff sues on a written contract, he must, if he recovers at all, recover on the cause of action sued upon.

From the Howard Circuit Court.

*384
      *J. O’Brien*and *H. D. Thompson,*for appellant.

*M. C. Bell*and *H. C. Purdum,*for appellees.

Olds, J.

— This is an action for damages for the breach of a written contract alleged to have been entered into between Marshall Cade and the appellee Norman Gordon, for the sale of a certain number of hogs by Cade to Gordon, and the contract was afterwards assigned by Cade to the appellant Carter. Issues were joined. One of the paragraphs of the answer of the appellee denied the execution of the contract, which was properly verified. The cause was submitted to the court for trial without the intervention of a jury, resulting in a finding and judgment in favor of the appellee. On proper request, the court found the facts specially, and stated its conclusions of law thereon. The appellant excepted to the conclusions of law, also filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled and exceptions reserved. The court found that the defendant, the appellee, never executed the contract sued upon. The sole question presented and discussed in the case is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the court, particularly the finding that the defendant never executed the contract sued on. This court has so repeatedly decided that it will not reverse a judgment on the weight of the evidence that it is unnecessary to cite authority in support of such rule.

It is conceded by counsel for appellant, in their brief, that there was evidence to support the finding of the court, and this admission is in accordance with the facts as they appear in the record. There was evidence to support the finding, and this court will not weigh the evidence to determine whether in its opinion the trial court rendered a proper conclusion supported by what this court might conclude was a preponderance of the evidence.

It is suggested that the court should have found other facts entitling the plaintiff to recover independently of the written contract sued upon, but the plaintiff, if he recovers at all, *385must recover on the cause of action sued upon. *Johnston*v. *Griest,*85 Ind. 503; *Johnson Harvester Co.*v. *Bartley,*81 Ind. 406*; Thomas*v. *Dale,*86 Ind.*435; Hasselman*v. *Carroll,*102 Ind. 153.

Filed Jan. 10, 1890.

There is no error in the record for which the judgment should be reversed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
---

CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
        reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
        reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
        servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
        statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
        agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
        servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
        AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]


Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 50834 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RESHAWN MOSSES LEAL , also known as Reshawn Leal,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 131

- 5

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Reshawn Mosses Leal has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leal h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 19, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-50834 Document: 00512775100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2014No. 13

- 50834

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GR ANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-50834 Document: 00512775100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> QUANTUM GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         506,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  740,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,728,121
<PP&E>                                         132,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,004,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,805,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,598
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,191,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,004,675
<SALES>                                        524,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               524,024
<CGS>                                          452,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               757,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (276,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (276,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (276,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1

Ascendis Pharma A/S

Subsidiaries
of the Registrant



|                                            |  |                              
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Ascendis Pharma GmbH                        |  | Germany                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Inc.                       |  | Delaware, USA                
|Ascendis Pharma, Endocrinology Division A/S |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Ophthalmology Division A/S |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma Bone Diseases A/S           |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma Growth Disorders A/S        |  | Denmark
#### LOUIS ZEMEL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued May 2, 1944

Decided July 1, 1944.

Before Justices Parker, Hbher and Colie.

Eor the appellant, *Louis Zemel (Louis J.*Miller, of counsel).

Eor the respondent, *A. Leon Eohlreiter (Archibald Ereiger,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colib, J.

In July, 1942, appellant, Zemel, delivered to respondent, Commercial Warehouses, Ine., forty-four drums *15of denatured alcohol, each containing fifty-four gallons. On January 27th, 1943, the appellant tendered to respondent the storage charges and demanded delivery of the forty-four drums. Thirty-eight drums only were redelivered to him, whereupon he instituted suit to recover damages for conversion of the six drums containing 324 gallons of alcohol. There is no dispute as to the facts; the sole ground of appeal being that the court erred in assessing the amount of the damages to which' the appellant was entitled. On January 27th, 1943, the Office of Price Administration had fixed a *wholesale*ceiling price on the converted commodity at 87 cents a gallon, and had fixed a *retail*ceiling price at $1.40 a gallon. There was evidence that wholesalers were on a quota basis; that the appellant, Zemel, had tried to buy alcohol in the wholesale market but failed. Lt follows from the fact that there was no denatured alcohol to be had in the wholesale market, that if the appellant wished to replace the alcohol that had been converted, he could do so only in the retail market, in which the ceiling price had been fixed at $1.40 a gallon. The court below assessed the damages against the defendant on the basis of 87 cents a gallon for the 324 gallons that were converted, with a credit thereon of $44, being the amount due and unpaid for storage.

We conclude that the learned judge erred in this respect. The appellant was in the retail business and we think it is a fair assumption that on the date of the conversion the alcohol liad a value to him of $1.40 a gallon and that judgment should have been entered for an amount which would compensate appellant for the sales that he lost at that price. *Ward*v. *Huff,*94 *N. J. L.*81. To do otherwise would be to penalize the appellant retailer for the wrongful conversion of his goods by the respondent warehouse company.

The judgment under appeal is reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to enter judgment in accordance herewith.
#### HENRY FRANCIS v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned officer of Lockbox Link, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/Iryna Clark Iryna Clark Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer    March 18, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                           2,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,243
<PP&E>                                           7,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,593
<SALES>                                        170,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,642
<CGS>                                          154,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (65)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from consolidated financial
statements for the period ending September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            9468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28121
<ALLOWANCES>                                       440
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 41505
<PP&E>                                          644730
<DEPRECIATION>                                   69875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  768809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37852
<BONDS>                                         394170
<COMMON>                                           285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      301343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    768809
<SALES>                                          82596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 82596
<CGS>                                            94505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    94505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (36367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12202)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1830)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25995)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 30, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chiu M. Chan       
|Chiu M. Chan           
|Chief Executive Officer



This certification is made solely
pursuant to the requirement of Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C., and is not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kenneth Cole Productions,
                     Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010
                     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
                     hereof (the "Report"), I, Jill Granoff, Chief Executive Officer of
                     the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
                     pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                     amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     results of operations of the Company.  /s/ JILL GRANOFFJill GranoffChief Executive OfficerKenneth Cole Productions, Inc August 5, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        A notice was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2010, to announce a meeting of the President's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships that was scheduled to be held on Tuesday, Feb. 9th, 2010. This meeting has been cancelled in its entirety. We will publish a new notice when the meeting has been rescheduled.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mara Vanderslice, White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships at                         *mvanderslice@who.eop.gov.*

      ( print page 6034)    
Dated: February 2, 2010.

Jamison Citron, 

Special Assistant, Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 2010-2577 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4154-07-P
585 A.2d 376

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN BUSH.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.