alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 21, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

J & L CONSULTING AND LESLIE L. LAGERQUIST , D.D.S. , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 12

- 00326

- CV V.

JAMES B. HANIGAN, JA MES B. HANIGAN, D.D. S., M.S., P.C. , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , James B. Hanigan, James B. Hanigan, D.D.S., M.S., P.C. , signed, January 1 9 , 2012 , was heard on the transcript of the record. On joint motion of the parties, w e order the appeal DISMISSED

.
We order the parties to each pay the ir costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1875

BLEMA DEKU, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-379-761) Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: June 9, 2004 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland, Assistant Director, Danielle Franco, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Blema Deku, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the BIA’s order and find that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Deku’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Moreover, despite Deku’s urgings, we do not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s decision denying Deku’s applications for asylum and withholding from removal. See8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(6) (2000); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 394, 405 (1995). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the BIA’s reasoning. See In re: Deku , No. A72-379-761 (BIA June 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10.11





 


		 LIMITED WAIVER AND AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SENIOR CREDIT AGREEMENT This Limited Waiver and Amendment No. 3 to Senior Credit Agreement (this "Limited Waiver") is made and entered into as of April _, 2018 by and among Denim.LA, Inc., a Delaware corporation d/b/a DSTLD ("DSTLD"), the stockholders of DSTLD signatories below ("Stockholders"), and bocm3-DSTLD-Senior Debt, LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Lender"). RECITALS A. DSTLD, Stockholders and Lenders entered into that certain Senior Credit Agreement , dated March 10, 2017 (the "Credit Agreement"), as amended. DSTLD has requested that Lenders temporarily waive certain covenants of the Credit Agreement, which Lenders have agreed to do on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: Through December 31, 2017 (such date the "Expiration Date"), the Lender hereby consents and permits DSTLD to maintain a ratio of total current assets of DSTLD as of the last day of each calendar month to total current liabilities of Borrower as of the last day of such calendar month (a "Minimum Current Ratio") of 1.10, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 5.13 of the Credit Agreement. Lender hereby waives any default by DSTLD solely under Section 5.13 of the Credit Agreement arising from DSTLD having a Minimum Current Ratio of less than 1.25. From and after the Expiration Date, so long as the Credit Agreement is in effect, DSTLD shall maintain a Minimum Current Ratio of 1.25. DSTLD hereby acknowledges and agrees that all of its obligations under the Credit Agreement, except as specifically set forth herein, shall remain in full force and effect. DSTLD agrees to pay those professional fees owing to Lenders pursuant to the Credit Agreement and in connection with preparing this Limited Waiver. This Limited Waiver shall be governed and construed in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreement. DSTLD acknowledges that neither previous waivers, extensions, and amendments granted to DSTLD by any Lender, nor the amendments and waivers granted herein, create any course of dealing or expectation with respect to any further waivers, extensions, or amendments, and DSTLD further acknowledges that Lenders have no obligation whatsoever to grant any additional waivers, extensions, amendments, or forbearance. DSTLD acknowledges it has no defenses, rights of setoff, or rights of recoupment to the enforceability or payment of any of its obligations under the Credit Agreement as amended hereby. No Event of Default under the Credit Agreement has occurred and is continuing as of the date of this Amendment. 


 




     


     


    

 


		 This Limited Waiver may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts, and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. This Limited Waiver may be executed by facsimile or scanned electronic signature. 


 




     


     


    

 


		DocuSign Envelope ID: C099A547-0D1F-4476-B4F6-A5AA44088109 Mark Lynn Mark T. Lynn, Co-CEO
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 916 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 

to prohibit the use of guarantee fees as offsets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. SANFORD (for himself and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to prohibit the use of guarantee fees 

as offsets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Risk Management and 

5 Homeowner Stability Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 916 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING THE USE OF GUARANTEE FEES AS 

2 OFFSETS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Congressional 

4 Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new section: 

6 ‘‘PROHIBITING THE USE OF GUARANTEE FEES AS

7 OFFSETS

8 ‘‘SEC. 316. (a) In the Senate or the House of Rep9 resentatives, if a bill, resolution, amendment, motion, or 

10 conference report includes a provision that increases, or 

11 extends the increase of, the guarantee fees of an enter12 prise, the chair of the Committee on the Budget of the 

13 applicable House shall not count the budgetary effects of 

14 such provision for purposes of title III and title IV of the 

15 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act of 1974, the 

16 Rules of the House of Representatives, and applicable pro17 visions of concurrent resolutions on the budget. 

18 ‘‘(b) The evaluation under subsection (a) shall not 

19 apply to any legislation that provides for an increase, or 

20 extension of an increase, of any guarantee fee of an enter21 prise to be used for the purpose of financing reforms to 

22 the secondary mortgage market.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con24 tents set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget 

25 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by inVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:26 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H916.IH H916

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 916 IH

1 serting after the item relating to section 315 the following 

2 new item: 

‘‘Sec. 316. Prohibiting the use of guarantee fees as offsets.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1037 

Recognizing the 29th anniversary of the Tribal Canoe Journey of the Tribal 

Nations of the Pacific Northwest and congratulating the Puyallup Tribe 

of Indians for hosting the 2018 Power Paddle to Puyallup. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2018 

Mr. HECK (for himself, Mr. KILMER, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LARSEN

of Washington, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. COLE, and Ms. 

MCCOLLUM) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 29th anniversary of the Tribal Canoe Journey of the Tribal Nations of the Pacific Northwest and 

congratulating the Puyallup Tribe of Indians for hosting 

the 2018 Power Paddle to Puyallup. 

Whereas 2018 marks the 29th anniversary of the first Tribal 

Canoe Journey, held in Seattle, Washington; 

Whereas the Puyallup Tribe of Indians is hosting the Tribal 

Canoe Journey for a second time with the 2018 Power 

Paddle to Puyallup; 

Whereas this year more than 100 Tribal canoes, representing 

more than sixty Tribal Nations from across the United 

States and Canada, will travel along the Pacific Ocean, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1037 IH 

the Salish Sea, and the Puget Sound to arrive at the 

shores of the Puyallup Tribe’s territory; 

Whereas the theme of this year’s Power Paddle to Puyallup 

is ‘‘Honoring our Medicine’’, which is a reminder of the 

importance of the Pacific Ocean, the Salish Sea, and the 

Puget Sound to the culture and economy of the Tribal 

Nations of the Pacific Northwest; and 

Whereas the Tribal Canoe Journey is a celebration of the resilient culture and way of life of the Tribal Nations of the 

Pacific Northwest and Tribal Nations across the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 29th anniversary of the Trib3 al Canoe Journey; 

4 (2) acknowledges that the Tribal Canoe Jour5 ney is a vital part of the fabric and culture of the 

6 Tribal Nations of the Pacific Northwest; and 

7 (3) congratulates the Puyallup Tribe of Indians 

8 for hosting the 2018 Power Paddle to Puyallup. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
IV 

House Calendar No. 181 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1051 

[Report No. 115–920] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, United 

States Code, to clarify the definition of ‘‘crime of violence’’, and for 

other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 

Mr. BUCK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend 

title 18, United States Code, to clarify the definition 

of ‘‘crime of violence’’, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 6691) to amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify 

4 the definition of ‘‘crime of violence’’, and for other pur5 poses. All points of order against consideration of the bill 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1051 RH 

1 are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

2 of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The pre3 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

4 and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

5 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

6 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

7 member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 

8 motion to recommit. 

9 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legisla10 tive day of September 13, 2018, for the Speaker to enter11 tain motions that the House suspend the rules as though 

12 under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee 

13 shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on 

14 the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant 

15 to this section. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 181 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1051 

[Report No. 115–920] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) 

of motions to suspend the rules. other purposes, and providing for consideration the definition of ‘‘crime of violence’’, and for to amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.405

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 176677 dated October 26, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

local telephone communication services, excluding local telephone communication services using coin-box telephones and public access services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

ProgTech-Yug

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1102301003530

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

2301075500

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

140, Vladimirskaya str., Krasnodar territory, Anapa district, Anapa, 353454

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 26, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 28, 2019 No. 516-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.А.   Pankov
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
#### IN THE MATTER OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION NUMBER 562.

November 16, 1987.

This matter having come before the Court on petitions for review of Opinion Number 562 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics,

And the Court having remanded the matter to a special master for the development of a “record adequate for judicial review,”

And the appellants having elected not to prosecute this matter further,

And good cause otherwise appearing;

It is ORDERED that the within appeals are hereby dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
October 31, 2003

| | /s/JOE R. DAVISJoe R. Davis
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
584 A.2d 218

#### ATLANTIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. TOTS & TODDLERS PRESCHOOL DAY CARE CENTER AND R.S., ETC.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 239 *N.J.Super.*276, 571 A.2d 300)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3861

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Pedro Delatorre

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge

____________

 Submitted: April 23, 2013

Filed: May 7, 2013

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Delatorre appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he 1

pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine after having

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge of the United States District 1

Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
been convicted of a felony drug offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B) and

851; and to possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). Counsel seeks leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the 180-month

sentence is unreasonable because it is longer than necessary to meet the statutory

goals ofsentencing and the district court failed to make an individualized assessment

of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. 

Delatorre’s guilty plea made him subject to statutory minimum sentences of

120 months in prison on the drug count and a consecutive 60 months in prison on the

firearm count. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) and

(c)(1)(D)(ii). The court in imposing these minimum consecutive sentences had no

authority to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum on either count. United

States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003). Therefore, counsel’s

argument fails. See United States v. Gregg, 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir. 2006)

(United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), does not relate to “statutorily-imposed

sentences”). Upon careful review of the record, we find no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         151,512                 151,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,514,105               2,514,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                   210,000                 210,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,671,272               2,671,272
<PP&E>                                       2,642,653               2,642,653
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,143,368               1,143,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,009,126              17,009,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,970,217               3,970,217
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    13,856,222              13,856,222
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,375,892)             (3,375,892)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,009,126              17,009,126
<SALES>                                      2,591,730               5,610,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,591,730               5,610,299
<CGS>                                        1,442,380               2,912,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,190,322               6,222,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (11,646)                (65,058)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149,351                 294,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (736,297)               (841,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (736,297)               (841,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (736,297)               (841,883)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)                   (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00234-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.F.B., et al., Children,

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-10-0610-CVW

Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

Appellee’s brief is due on August 27, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 816 

To amend the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 to improve reporting 

about animal testing and alternative test method use by Federal agencies, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. ROYCE of California, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 

BISHOP of Michigan, Ms. TITUS, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MARINO, and Ms. 

ROYBAL-ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 to improve reporting about animal testing and alternative test 

method use by Federal agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Accountability 

5 in Chemical Testing Act’’ or the ‘‘FACT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; PROVISION OF INFOR7 MATION. 

8 (a) REPORT CONTENTS.— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 816 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (7) of section 

2 3(e) of the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (42 

3 U.S.C. 285l–3(e)) is amended by inserting before 

4 the period at the end of the paragraph the following: 

5 ‘‘, to include a description of the progress on the de6 velopment, validation, acceptance, and utilization of 

7 alternative test methods (including animal use data 

8 by species, number, and test type) for toxicological 

9 testing conducted, supported, or required by, or sub10 mitted to, each Federal agency listed in subsection 

11 (c) during the reporting period’’. 

12 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

13 by paragraph (1) applies with respect to reports that 

14 are made available to the public on or after the date 

15 that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this 

16 Act. 

17 (b) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—Section 4 of the 

18 ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 285l–4) 

19 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(f) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—Each Federal 

21 agency carrying out a program described in subsection (a), 

22 or its specific regulatory unit or units, shall provide 

23 ICCVAM with information needed to carry out this Act.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS