alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, George C. Platt, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of ViewCast.com, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the Report). By execution of this statement, I certify that:  (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report. This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended
that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Date: May 14, 2004
    /s/ George C. PlattGeorge C. PlattPresident
and Chief Executive Officer 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Laurie L. Latham, is the Chief Financial Officer of
ViewCast.com, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the Report). By execution of this statement, I certify that:  (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report. This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended
that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Date: May 14, 2004
    /s/  Laurie L. LathamLaurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer 2
Exhibit 32.2

I, Douglas J. Kelley,
 Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial,  Inc. certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the
information  contained in the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period
ended March 31,          2006 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition and results of operations of          Fentura Financial, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information  contained in the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period
ended March 31,          2006 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition and results of operations of          Fentura Financial, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:  May 12, 2006 |  | /S/ Douglas J. Kelley
Douglas J. KelleyChief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.      I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.      Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.      Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.      The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: December 12,  2005               |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
|                                        |
| /s/ Robert H.  Barghaus                     |   |
| Robert H.  Barghaus                         |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)             The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Robert B. Goergen                    |   |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   | June 11, 2007                        |   |
|        |        |                                      |        |  |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard containedtherein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
#### Maurice Anthony JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Brandi A. GIRTMAN, Appellee.

No. 4D10-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 13, 2010.

Maurice Anthony Johnson, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Brandi A. Girtman, Boynton Beach, pro se.

*On Motion for Rehearing*

PER CURIAM.

We deny the motion for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion, and substitute the following in its place.

*Dismissed. See Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman,*758 So.2d 91 (Fla.2000) (order denying a motion to dismiss pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) is not an appealable non-final order); *see also Wick v. Spector,*562 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (order denying motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is a non-final, non-appealable order).

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        456,225  
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 721,879 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   99,810
<INVENTORY>                                   269,101 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,375,775
<PP&E>                                      3,097,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                353,754 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,398,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,576,413
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      100,396
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,845,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,398,420
<SALES>                                     1,375,016      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,375,016      
<CGS>                                       2,399,532        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,399,532        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             78,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,145,742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,145,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,145,742)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Thomas E. Fairley, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.    the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by such Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |
584 A.2d 237

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEPHEN DOBRON.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AR C OS SANC HEZ-M AC IAS, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 14-71948 Age n c y No. A087-744-542 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. M arc os Sa

nc h e z -M a c ia s, a

native and c i tiz e n

of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) fina l orde r of re m ova l. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e findings of fa c t, Gutie rre z v . 

# FIL ED JAN 27 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).Muk

ase y , 521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd we de ny

the pe t ition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm ination tha t Sa nc he z M a c ia s fa ile d to e sta

b lish there quisitete n y e ars of c ontinuous phy s ic a l pre se nc e in the U nite d State s for c anc e lla tion of re m ova l, whe re his te stim o ny an d re c o rd e vide nc e supporte d the a ge nc y ’ s finding tha t Sa nc he z -M a c ia s knowingly and volunta rily a c c e pte d volunta

ry de pa rture in lie u of re m ova l proc e e dings in 2009. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Gutie rre z , 521 F.3d a

t 1117-18 (a c c e pta

nc e of volunta ry de pa rture te rm inat e s phy sic a l pre se nc e if pe titione r unde rstood he ha d the right to go be fore an

IJ a nd c hose to de pa

rt inste a d). In light of this disposition, we ne e d not re a c h San c he z -M a c ia s’ re m a ining c onte ntions re g arding his e quitie s in theUnite d Stat e s, his c re dibility , whe the r he de m onstra

te d good m ora l c ha

ra c te r, or whe the r he m a de a fa l se c la im of Unite d Stat e s c itiz e nship. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 4 - 7 1 9 4 8 2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Darryl L. CLAY.

No. 2011-KK-0650.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 497-324; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0147.

Denied.

GUIDRY, and CLARK, JJ„ would grant.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 195 (Friday, October 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62423-62424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,855]


Barnstead Thermolyne Corporation, a Subsidiary of Thermo Fisher 
Scientific, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Sedona Staffing and 
Per Mar, Dubuque, IA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on February 22, 2010, applicable to workers of Barnstead Thermolyne 
Corporation, a subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific, including on-
site leased workers from Sedona Staffing, Dubuque, Iowa. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21361).
    At the request of a State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production of scientific laboratory 
equipment.
    New information shows that workers leased from Per Mar were 
employed on-site at the Dubuque, Iowa location of Barnstead Thermolyne 
Corporation, a subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific. The Department 
has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control 
of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Per Mar working on-site at 
the Dubuque, Iowa location of Barnstead Thermolyne Corporation, a 
subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,855 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Barnstead Thermolyne Corporation, including on-
site leased workers from Sedona Staffing and Per Mar, Dubuque, Iowa, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after November 11, 2008, through February 22, 2012 and all workers 
in the group threatened with total or partial separation from 
employment on the date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.


[[Page 62424]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of September 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-25398 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
584 A.2d 209

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND BETHEA.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

S.R.G.,

Petitioner

v.

D.D.G.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 715 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Petitioner’s Application for Leave of Court to File Amended Petition for Allowance

of Appeal is GRANTED

.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,except for the matters set forth in Part II – Item 5 of this Quarterly Report;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  H. Barghaus                         |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | December  16, 2004                          |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Amanda Gail Plisner, Los Angeles, California, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1747 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 27, 2019, and upon reading the October 31, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Shoor], 175 AD3d 1771, 1771-1772 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark and Pritzker, JJ., concur.