alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three months ended          Nine months ended
                                        December 31,               December 31,
                                  -----------------------    -----------------------
                                     1999         1998          1999         1998
                                  ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
<S>                            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Net income as reported . . . . .  $1,274,000   $  836,000    $3,525,000   $2,896,000
                                   =========    =========    ==========   ==========

BASIC:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . 4,816,458    4,844,969     4,808,951    4,879,590
                                   =========    =========     =========    =========
  Basic net income per share . . .     $0.26        $0.17         $0.73        $0.59
                                   =========    =========     =========    =========

DILUTED:
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . 4,816,458    4,844,969     4,808,951    4,879,590
    Common stock equivalents from
      options computed on the
      treasury-stock method using
      the average fair market
      value of common stock
      outstanding during the
      period . . . . . . . . . . .   360,784      138,799       301,484      180,945
                                   =========    =========     =========    =========
    Shares used in the
      computation. . . . . . . . . 5,177,242    4,983,768     5,110,435    5,060,535
                                   =========    =========     =========    =========

  Diluted net income per share . .     $0.25        $0.17         $0.69        $0.57
                                   =========    =========     =========    =========

</TABLE>

All number of shares data has been retroactively restated to reflect a 3-for-2
stock split distributed September 23, 1999.
585 A.2d 412

#### LIDA M. STELLA v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. AND DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS HIGH YIELD SECURITIES, INC. AND MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK AND MIDLANTIC NATIONAL BANK/SOUTH v. JOHN J. SYKES, JR.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*55, 574 A.2d 468)
585 A.2d 339

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DORSEL DENISE TRINIWELL.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 201

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GENE M. DIULIO.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-1671

___________________________ Sokiry Kim Ieng lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner - Appellant
v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Respondent - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________ Submitted: September 21, 2012 Filed: September 26, 2012 [Unpublished]

____________ LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. After Sokiry Ieng pleaded guilty to cons piracy to distribute methamphetamine, the District Court 1 sentenced him to 240 months in prison and four years of supervised

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United Stat es District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.release; he did not appeal. Ieng late r filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion claiming that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a direct appeal. Following an evidentiary hearing, the District C ourt denied relief. Crediting plea counsel’s testimony that he had convin ced Ieng that the only realis tic means of reducing his sentence was through a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, the court found that Ieng voluntarily and intentiona lly chose not to appeal. The court thus concluded that Ieng’s counsel was not ineffective but granted Ieng a certificate of appealability on the issue. Upon careful review, we affirm the j udgment of the District Court. See Covey v. United States , 377 F.3d 903, 906 (8th Cir. 2004) (“We review the ineffective assistance issue de novo, but findings of unde rlying predicate facts are reviewed for clear error.”); see also Yodprasit v. United States , 294 F.3d 966, 969 (8th Cir. 2002) (explaining that a district court need not believe a prisoner’s bare assertion that he asked counsel to file an appeal if it fi nds that evidence to the contrary is more credible); Barger v. United States , 204 F.3d 1180, 1181 (8th Cir. 2000) (noting that an appellate court “accord[s] deferenc e to the district court’s credibility determinations” when reviewing a claim thatcounsel failed to file an appeal). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 0422 LT Case No. 19

- CP

- 420

_____________________________
W ILLIAM P.C. S MITH , III
, Appellant,

v.

C YNTHIA H OLLINGSWORTH AND S YLVIA A DAMS , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

. William P.C. Smith, III
, Waverly, Georgia, pro se

. No Appearance for Appellee s

.

January 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

M AKAR , W ALLIS , and S OUD , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
584 A.2d 208

#### MARIA T. MONTORO v. JOSEPH MONTORO.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A of Safari
Associates,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended  September 30, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Morton Berger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                   /s/ Morton Berger
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Morton Berger

Date: January 14, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83085 

# FILED FEB 0 3 

# an ELIZABETH A. BROWN =RICO 8PREE cow BY DEPU 

### tvirkt

( ruc IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JACK P. SLOVAK, A/K/A JOHN PAUL SLOVAK, JR. AND JOHN PAUL SLOVAK, DECEASED. TYLER SLOVAK, Appellant,

vs. LYNN VALERIE SLOVAK, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a summary judgment denying a contest of a will. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K. Simons, Judge. This appeal was docketed in this court on June 21, 2021. It was removed from the settlement program on August 5, 2021, briefing was reinstated, and appellant was informed of the deadlines for filing of documents and briefs. Appellant filed the docketing statement on August 16, 2021, and has filed nothing since. The transcript request form was due August 19, 2021, and the opening brief was due November 3, 2021. On November 16, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based on appellant's failure to comply with this court's deadlines for filing. See NRAP 31(d) "If an appellant fails to file an opening brief or appendix within the time provided by this Rule, or within the time extended. a respondent may move for dismissal of the appeal or the court may dismiss the appeal on its own motion."). To date, appellant has not filed a response to the

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA ( 0) 1947A .46P011. 

### -0375)-motion to dismiss or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly,

this court concludes that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.



# iA,„1 e Att,, J. Hardesty 

# Ai4au.0 J. Stiglich

J.

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Jill I. Greiner, Settlement Judge Robert J. Fedor LLC Tory M. Pankopf, Ltd. Wallace & Millsap LLC Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A csietr

, 2
EX-32

 

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of International Endeavors Corp, for the Period ended  December 31, 2015, I, Nate Engel, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

May 25, 2016
EXHIBIT 35.1



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity
as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, among Mercedes-Benz
Auto Receivables Trust 2014-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA
LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), for the period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016
(the “Reporting Period”).



I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement
has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 20, 2017





| | /s/ Brian T. Stevens                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Name: Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title: Vice President and Controller
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 93 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased access 

to Department of Veterans Affairs medical care for women veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California (for herself and Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased access to Department of Veterans Affairs medical care for women veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVED ACCESS TO DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CARE FOR WOMEN 

5 VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new section: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 93 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1720H. Medical services for women veterans 

2 ‘‘(a) ACCESS TO CARE.—The Secretary shall ensure 

3 that gender specific services are continuously available at 

4 every medical center and community based outpatient clin5 ic of the Department. 

6 ‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF PERSONNEL.—The Secretary 

7 may employ such personnel and enter into such contracts 

8 as may be necessary to provide the services required under 

9 subsection (a) based on the standards of the Department 

10 and the demand, and the projected growth of the demand, 

11 for such services, as determined by the Secretary’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

13 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

14 after the item relating to section 1720G the following new 

15 item: 

‘‘1720H. Medical services for women veterans.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information providedto me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark, as Primary Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association,as Trustee for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the State Farm PortfolioMortgage Loan, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the State Farm Portfolio Mortgage Loan on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated: March 17, 2022

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: June 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Robert H. Barghaus |   |
|------------------------|--------|

Robert H. Barghaus

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

----
585 A.2d 412

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF T.M.F.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, RobertB. Goergen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certifythat:

1.                 Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date:December 10, 2004
| /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |
|--------------------------------------|
| Robert B. Goergen                    |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----