alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Detroit Union Railroad Depot & Station Company v. The City of Detroit and Charles K. Trombly.

*Depot companies*— Taxation—Grain *elevator.*

A grain elevator erected upon its property by a union depot company organized under the union depot act of 1881 (How. Stat. chap. 93), and used as a grain warehouse in connection with, its general business as a common carrier, is a necessary part of the equipment, and is not liable to taxation under the *general tax law*of the State.

Appeal from Wayne. (Reilly, J.)

Argued October 28, 1891.

Decided November 13, 1891.

Bill to restrain the sale of property for taxes, and *348to vacate an assessment. Defendants appeal.

Decree affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*F. A. Baker (James F. Joy,*of counsel), for complainant.

*E. Minock (J. J. Speed,*of counsel), for defendants.

Grant, J.

The complainant is organized under Act No. 244, Laws of 1881 (How. Stat. c. 93).

Among the general powers conferred, by this act upon corporations organized under it is the following:

> “ To erect and maintain all necessary and convenient buildings, stations, depots, and fixtures for the accommodation and use of passengers, and of freight and other business within the purpose of its organization.” Section 4, subd. 5.

Section 21 provides that such corporations shall pay an annual tax of 2-£ per cent, upon their gross earnings, said tax to be in lieu of all other taxes upon their property, except such real estate as is owned and can be conveyed by them under the laws of the State, and not actually occupied in the exercise of their franchises, and not necessary for the proper use thereof.

The complainant erected an elevator upon its property in the city of Detroit, on the bank of the Detroit river. The city of Detroit in the year 1889 placed this elevator upon the general assessment roll for said city, and assessed the same for general city purposes to the amount of $3,711.97. Complainant refused to pay, and the defendants were proceeding to a sale of the property, when this bill was filed to restrain the sale. Decree was entered for the complainant.

The decree was correct. It is altogether too narrow a construction of this statute to hold that an elevator is not included in the provision of the law above quoted. This elevator is as essential and necessary- to the com*349plainant in the handling of its grain as is its depot for the use of passengers, or its freight depot for the handling of the general merchandise it carries. It is complainant’s grain depot, used in the business of transportation, and only used as a warehouse in connection with its regular business as a common carrier. The Legislature evidently understood an elevator to constitute a necessary part of complainant’s equipment, for section 29 of the act provides for the rate of compensation which companies organized under it may charge and receive for elevator service. How. Stat. § 3486. The assessment of this tax was therefore illegal and void.

Decree affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Champlin, C. J., Morse and Long, JJ., concurred. McGrath, J., did not sit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (80)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,359
<PP&E>                                          20,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,021
<SALES>                                        100,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,807
<CGS>                                           59,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (232)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

## Board Votes To Close September 30, 2010, Meeting

In person and by telephone vote on September 30, 2010, a majority of the members contacted and voting, the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was possible.

# Items Considered:

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

# General Counsel Certification:

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-25658 Filed 10-6-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,211,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,766,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,231,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       4,102,865<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,312,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,322,964
<BONDS>                                     44,465,153<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,416
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,487,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,312,418
<SALES>                                     16,350,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,727,597
<CGS>                                       14,215,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,534,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,193,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                   453,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            740,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   740,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY DOES NOT PREPARE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
<F2>INCLUDES DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSET OF $848,000
<F3>INCLUDES NONRECOURSE OBLIGATIONS OF $7,645,631
<F4>AMOUNT, $2,094,107 IS INCLUDED IN TAG 30 "TOTAL COSTS"
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### American Sales Book Co., Inc., Appellee, *v.*Hawke, Appellant.

(No. 6327 —

Decided July 6, 1943.)

*Messrs. O’Brien é Beck,*for appellee.

*Mr. Clifford L. Mueller,*for appellant.

By the Court.

It is clear that the order overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings *376and granting plaintiff leave to amend is not a final order or judgment.

The motion to dismiss this appeal is, therefore, sustained, this court being without jurisdiction to review this order.

There is no conflict between this ruling of this court and the ruling express or implied in the case of *Hummel*v. *Columbus Baseball Club, Inc.,*71 Ohio App., 321. The appeal in that case was from a final judgment that was entered upon the sustaining of a motion. No judgment has been entered in this case.

Our decision is not in conflict with any case relied upon by the defendant, appellant herein, and, therefore, the request to certify the case to the Supreme Court is denied.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Ross, P. J., Hildebrant and Matthews, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> The schedule contains summary financial information from consolidated
         financial statements for the period ending March 31, 1997 and is  
         qualified in its entirety by refernece to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000 
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                       640
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,612
<PP&E>                                         161,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,876
<BONDS>                                         45,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,039
<SALES>                                         23,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,492
<CGS>                                           12,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134725 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134725 COA: 278720 Jackson CC: 06-004134-FH CHRISTINE ANNE PRATER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
585 A.2d 357

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE REED.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

Dated March 21, 2016

 
|   | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2014-B                          |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Bedford  Bancshares,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  December  31, 2002 (the
"Report") as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission,  we, Harold K.
Neal, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James W. Smith, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>

/s/Harold K. Neal                           /s/James W. Smith
--------------------------------            --------------------------------
Harold K. Neal                              James W. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer       Vice President, Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

</TABLE>


January 29, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 785 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 785

  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

    Mr. King of Iowa (for himself and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Right-to-Work Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the ``Act'') (29 
U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ``except to'' and all that follows 
through ``authorized in section 8(a)(3)''.
    (b) Section 8(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)) is amended by 
striking ``: Provided, That'' and all that follows through ``retaining 
membership'' in paragraph (3).
    (c) Section 8(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is amended by 
striking ``or to discriminate'' and all that follows through 
``retaining membership'' in paragraph (2) and by striking ``covered by 
an agreement authorized under subsection (a)(3) of this section'' in 
paragraph (5).
    (d) Section 8(f) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is amended by 
striking clause (2) and by redesignating clauses (3) and (4) as (2) and 
(3), respectively.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

    Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) is amended by 
striking paragraph Eleventh.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                       WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV L.P. Series 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             897,077
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   897,077
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,876,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,784,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,876,718
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    36,724
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       58,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   624,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (646,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (646,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (646,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (55.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 HERITAGE
OAKS BANCORP
  Quarterly
Report on Form 10Q
 for the
Quarter ended March 31, 2005
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 The
undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Dated: April
20, 2005
 ****/s/ Margaret A. TorresMargaret A. Torres Executive Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:   August 3, 2009
    /s/ Bradley KrehbielBradley Krehbiel(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jon EberleJon EberleSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)