alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 I, David T. Stoner, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 15, 2010
    /s/  David T. StonerDavid T. StonerChief Executive Officer
585 A.2d 380

#### STANLEY J. OCZKOWSKI v. JANINA OCZKOWSKI.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   Date May 15, 2008
    /s/  George C. PlattGeorge C. PlattChief Executive Officer
584 A.2d 203

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAVIER MARTINEZ.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 252

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWIN RODRIGUEZ.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6140

WILLIAM STEVEN GAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. TAYLOR, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-1267-AM)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Steven Gay, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Steven Gay seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Gay v. Taylor, No. CA-98-1267-AM

(E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                               HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
McNeil, President of the Company, and I, Jon Eberle, Senior Vice President and
CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:   November 3, 2006          /s/ Michael McNeil
                                  Michael McNeil
                                  President/Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

                                  /s/ Jon Eberle
                                  Jon Eberle
                                  Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         756,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,154,806
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,199,403)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,747,937
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,567,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,927,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,043,802
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,775
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,854,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,927,526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,547,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,121,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,938,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,286,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,492,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                   557,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   935,145
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000210 19-APR-2018 08:43 AM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                                                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  June 9, 2004 |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATE
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
        the Securities & Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        H. Stewart Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)          The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)          The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: 
                    November 9, 2006
                  By:
                  /s/ 
H.
                    Stewart ParkerH.
                    Stewart ParkerPresident,
                    Chief
                    Executive Officer and Director
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  This
        certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        as
        Exhibit 32 to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
        Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and in accordance
        with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K. This certification is not being
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        and is not and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
        the
        Form 10-Q or any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934.
   25
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-0422

LT Case No. 19-CP-420

_____________________________

WILLIAM P.C. SMITH, III,

Appellant,

v.

CYNTHIA HOLLINGSWORTH

AND SYLVIA ADAMS,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

William P.C. Smith, III, Waverly, Georgia, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellees.

January 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, WALLIS, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
#### Henry LAMB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Henry Lamb, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *Munn v. Florida Parole Commn.,*807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

WOLF, KAHN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7367 

To designate a peak in the State of Washington as ‘‘Mount Cleator’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. BEYER (for himself and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate a peak in the State of Washington as ‘‘Mount 

Cleator’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MOUNT CLEATOR IN THE 

4 STATE OF WASHINGTON. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 7,630-foot peak located at 

6 latitude 48.11516° N, longitude 120.94636° W, in the 

7 Glacier Peak Wilderness in the State of Washington, shall 

8 be known and designated as ‘‘Mount Cleator’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7367 IH

1 States to the peak referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

2 deemed to be a reference to Mount Cleator. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### In re Connie M. EASTERLY.

No. 2010-B-2765.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 28, 2011.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent violated Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, proposing that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Connie M. Easterly, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26278, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, retroactive to May 20, 2010, the date of her interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Exhibit 34.13



LOGO



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of 2014 Compliance with Applicable
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB
for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the Platform), including only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31,
2014, excluding the following criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(i-vi) and 1122(d)(4)(viii-xv), which management has determined are not applicable to
the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Appendix B to managements assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including
tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities
related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

Irvine, California

March 4, 2015
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7310

BOBBY SHAW, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RALPH S. BEARDSLEY; CHARLES CONDON, the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-317-2-23) Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file specific, timely objections to this recommendation could waiveappellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant filed only general, conclusory objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. As the magistrate judge advised, such general, non-specific objections are not sufficient. See Howard v. Secretary , 932 F.2d 505, 508-09 (6th Cir. 1991); Opriano v. Johnson , 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1985). The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trico Marine Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date:
May 2, 2008
    
    By: /s/ Joe CompofeliceJoe CompofeliceChief Executive Officer
 27
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7125 

To rename the portions of the Gateway National Seashore located on Staten 

Island, New York, as the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley National Seashore’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2018 

Mr. DONOVAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To rename the portions of the Gateway National Seashore 

located on Staten Island, New York, as the ‘‘Senator 

James L. Buckley National Seashore’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENAMING PORTIONS OF THE GATEWAY NA4 TIONAL SEASHORE. 

5 (a) RENAMING.—The portions of the Gateway Na6 tional Seashore located on Staten Island, New York shall 

7 be known as the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley National 

8 Seashore’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7125 IH

1 States to the portions of the Gateway National Seashore 

2 located on Staten Island, New York, is deemed to be a 

3 reference to the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley National Sea4 shore’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
584 A.2d 227

#### WILLIAM BRODERICK v. PLANNING BOARD OF CLIFFSIDE PARK.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.