alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

1.                 I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: December 10, 2004
| /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |
|--------------------------------------------|
| Robert H. Barghaus                         |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Coleman and Overton 

Argued at Salem, Virginia 

THOMAS LEROY LIPSCOMB 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 2202-96-3 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JANUARY 27, 1998 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY 

William W. Sweeney, Judge 

 Jonathan S. Kurtin (Harvey S. Lutins; Lutins, 

Shapiro & Kurtin, on brief), for appellant. 

 Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General 

(Richard Cullen, Attorney General, on brief), 

for appellee. 

 Thomas L. Lipscomb (defendant) was found guilty by a jury of 

distribution of cocaine in violation of Code § 18.2-248 on June 

30, 1995. During its deliberations, the jury asked to rehear an 

audiotaped recording of the drug sale which formed the basis of 

defendant's conviction. Defendant now appeals, ascribing error 

to the trial court's decision to allow the jury to listen to the 

tape. Because we find no error by the trial judge in allowing 

the jury to have the audiotape, we affirm the conviction. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record in the 

cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no 

precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. 

 The audiotape at issue was offered into evidence by the 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

prosecution after foundation was laid by Special Agent Langhorne 

of the Department of State Police and Melody Little, a party to 

the drug sale at issue. See Witt v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 

215, 220, 422 S.E.2d 465, 469 (1992) (holding that as long as a 

proper foundation is laid, audiotapes may be admitted into 

evidence). Defendant had several opportunities to object to the 

tape being entered into evidence, yet he declined to act. 

Because no timely, contemporaneous objection was made, we decline 

to address the issue of whether the tape should have been allowed 

into evidence, and we assume it was properly admitted. Rule 

5A:18. 

 After it is determined that the tape was in evidence, the 

plain terms of Code § 8.01-381 govern our decision. Code 

§ 8.01-381 states explicitly that "[e]xhibits requested by the 

jury shall be sent to the jury room or may otherwise be made 

available to them." After exhibits are entered into evidence, 

the trial court has no other option but to give them to the jury 

upon request. Indeed, it would have been an abuse of discretion 

if the trial court had not given them the tape. Because the 

record is clear that the jury requested the audiotape, the trial 

court's action was proper. 

 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm defendant's conviction. 

 Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         610,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        287,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   529,525
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Momo Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [intentionally omitted];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                
|----- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 20, 2015                 
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang    
|      |  | Name: Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang  
|      |  | Title:  Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25907]



[[Page 63196]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-15]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Family Unification Program (FUP)

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its website of the applicant 
information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and other 
requirements for the FY2010 Family Unification Program. This Notice of 
Funding Availability (NOFA) announces the availability of approximately 
$15 million for new incremental voucher assistance to provide adequate 
housing as a means to promote family unification through the FUP. In 
accordance with the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2010, this funding 
must be provided to Public Housing Agencies with demonstrated 
experience and resources for supportive services, as evidenced by the 
executed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Public Child 
Welfare Agency (PCWA).
    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the Family Unification Program is 
14.880. Applications must be submitted electronically through 
Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to Amaris Rodriguez at (202) 708-0477 
or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0f030f1c071d401c010a1c07091b0b142e061b0a40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02636f63706b712c706d66706b65776778426a77662c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>. Program staff will not be 
available to provide guidance on how to prepare the application. 
Questions regarding the 2010 General Section should be directed to the 
Office of Grants Management and Oversight at (202) 708-0667 or the NOFA 
Information Center at 800-HUD-8929 (toll free). Persons with hearing or 
speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the 
Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25907 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
584 A.2d 228

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEROY MCLAUREN.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the first quarter meetings of the National Small 
Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meetings for the fourth quarter will be held on the 
following dates:

Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010 at 1 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides 
advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator 
for Small Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:

--Follow up on ASBDC Annual Conference.
--White Paper Issues.
--SBA Update.
--Member Roundtable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public, 
however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
be a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by fax or e-
mail. Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone 202-619-1612, Fax 202-
481-0134, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66070a070808074800070a050908032615040748010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79181518171718571f18151a16171c390a1b18571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Dan S. Jones,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25727 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Nonhuman Primate Cellular Immunology Core for HIV Vaccine Research.                    

*Date:*                         March 1, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Erica L. Brown, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program,  Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2639,                         *ebrown@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2565 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



RF MONOLITHICS, INC.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 13th day of April, 2005.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName:

Harley E Barnes IIITitle:

Chief Financial Officer




---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ISRAEL SALINAS, individually, and as parent

and natural guardian of JS, LS, and IAS,

Appellant,

v.

RICHARD WEDEN, MARY WEDEN and

FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-3634 

[November 25, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2018CA000876.

Marc R. Ginsberg of Mandina & Ginsberg, LLP, Miami Lakes, for 

appellant.

John Bond Atkinson and Tiffany Bustamante of Atkinson, P.A., Miami, 

for appellees Richard Weden and Mary Weden.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment in favor of homeowners on a 

complaint by an independent contractor for injuries he suffered when he 

was electrocuted while trimming trees on their property.

A property owner is generally not liable for injuries sustained by an 

independent contractor or its employees while performing their work. See

Phillips v. Republic Fin. Corp., 157 So. 3d 320, 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); 

Houk v. Monsanto Co., 609 So. 2d 757, 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). An 

exception to that general rule is that:

‘A person who is having work done on his premises by an 

independent contractor, and has actual or constructive 

knowledge of latent or potential dangers on the premises, 

owes a duty to give warning of, or use ordinary care to furnish 

protection against, such dangers to employees of the 
2

contractor and subcontractor who are without actual or 

constructive notice of the dangers.’

Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Robinson, 68 So. 2d 406, 411 (Fla. 1953) (citations 

omitted). However, “[a]n ‘owner is entitled to assume that the invitee will 

perceive that which would be obvious to him upon the ordinary use of his 

own sense, and is not required to give the invitee notice or warning of an 

obvious danger.’” Rice v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 363 So. 2d 834, 839 (Fla. 

3d DCA 1978), citing Hall v. Holland, 47 So. 2d 889, 891-92 (Fla. 1950).

The independent contractor admitted that he saw the electric lines 

above the palm trees. While the contractor contends that he did not know 

that the lines were high voltage lines, it does not seem to us that this 

constitutes a latent danger. All electric lines are dangerous, some more 

than others. “[T]he existence of unobstructed power lines, clearly visible 

above an open field is not a latent hazard.” Rice, 363 So. 2d at 839; see 

also Somers v. Meyers, 171 So. 2d 598, 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965) (“[I]t is 

presumed that the inherent dangers of electrically energized wires is [sic]

known to all except those of tenderest age.”).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.