alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-10-028]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  October 15, 2010 at 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-469 and 731-TA-1168 (Final) (Certain Seamless 
Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from China)--
briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit 
its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of 
Commerce on or before October 27, 2010.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-249 and 731-TA-262, 263, and 265 (Third Review) 
(Iron Construction Castings from Brazil, Canada, and China)--briefing 
and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before October 27, 2010.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. GC-10-161 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-413 (Certain 
Rare-Earth Magnets and Magnetic Materials and Articles Containing 
Same).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 8, 2010.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2010-25936 Filed 10-12-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6073
ROBERT T. SINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES TURPIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-170-1-MU) Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 13, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert T. Sines, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert T. Sines appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sines’ motions for appointment of counsel and for production of medical records, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeSines v. Turpin , No. CA-03- 170-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1999 and the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000921112
<NAME> LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,534
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,139
<PP&E>                                       3,191,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 257,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,087,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,699
<BONDS>                                      1,463,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    120,814
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,172,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,087,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               347,667
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,523
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as
Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of
the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kelly E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended February 24, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|              |  |                                           
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By:           |  | /s/ KELLY E. LANG                         
|              |  | Kelly E. Lang                             
|              |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|              |  | (Principal Financial Officer)             
|             
|April 5, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources 
(<greek-i>1119).
    Date/Time: November 3, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. November 4, 
2010; 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 555, Stafford II Annex, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203.
    Type of Meeting: OPEN*.
    *Visitors please report to the Information Center in NSF's North 
Lobby to receive your Visitor Badge and directions to the Stafford 
II Annex building next door to NSF's main building.
    Contact Person: James Colby, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-5331 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e444d41424c576e405d4800494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="365c55595a544f7658455018515940">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice with respect to the 
Foundation's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 
(STEM) education and human resources programming.

Agenda

November 3, 2010 (Wednesday)

    Report from the NSF Acting Assistant Director for Education and 
Human Resources Strategic Vision Break-out Groups:

Working Lunch
Break-out Groups Report to Full Committee
Visit with NSF Director and Deputy Director

November 4, 2010 (Thursday)

    Receipt of Committee of Visitor Reports for:

Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Program
Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate Program
Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology Program
Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Undergraduate Program
Tribal Colleges and Universities Program

    Joint Meeting with Members of the Mathematical and Physical 
Sciences Advisory Committee.
    Adjournment.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-25823 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7336

JAMES D. HABURN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOEL BREWER, District Attorney; DETECTIVE

RAGAN; DETECTIVE PERKINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-93-317-1)

Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: January 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron,

Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; James

Anthony Penry, WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court.

Haburn v. Brewer, No. CA-93-317-1 (M.D.N.C. July 31, 1995). We

agree that, with respect to Appellant's damages claim, the district

court properly dismissed that claim. See Heck v. Humphrey, ___ U.S.

___, ___, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594, 4597 (U.S. June 24, 1994) (No. 93-

6188). Further, although the district court did not address Appellant's request for declaratory and injunctive relief, to the extent

that this action is properly construed as a habeas corpus action,

Appellant must demonstrate that he has exhausted state court remedies. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973); Hamlin v.

Warren, 664 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 911

(1982). Because Appellant may refile his action if his conviction

ever is overturned or called into question by the appropriate court

or upon the exhaustion of state remedies, we modify the judgment to

be a dismissal without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Natural History.                    

*Date:*                         November 2, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel Washington, 1515 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25630 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 78 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36304) and Amendment No. 860 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 9, 2021, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2021, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account
      N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 10, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      17,300,000
<SECURITIES>                                14,100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,900,000
<PP&E>                                       6,100,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,200,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,800,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,000,000
<BONDS>                                      7,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    70,600,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,800,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               800,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,800,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,900,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
Dismiss; Opinion Filed January 24, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00027-CR

EX PARTE ANGEL GUADALUPE TORRES

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX19-90191-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Myers

On January 9, 2020, Angel Guadalupe Torres filed a “Notice of Past Due Findings of 

Fact and Conclusions of Law” with this Court. To date, no notice of appeal has been filed either 

in the trial court or in this Court.

“In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a sufficient notice of appeal.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b). “Notice is sufficient if it shows the party’s desire to appeal from the 

judgment or other appealable order . . . .” Id. 25.2(c)(2).

The notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions of law is directed to the Criminal 

District Court No. 3 and makes no mention of an appeal to this Court. And, when asked, the 

Dallas County District Clerk informed us no documents indicating an intent to appeal had been 

filed below. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over this case. 

We dismiss this appeal.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

200027F.U05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

EX PARTE ANGEL GUADALUPE 

TORRES

No. 05-20-00027-CR

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX19-90191-J.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices 

Schenck and Carlyle participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 24th day of January, 2020.
¡IMPORTANTE! Este sitio web contiene información importante sobre los servicios que brinda la 

Administración de Seguridad y Salud en las Minas y sus derechos y responsabilidades. Es crucial que 

comprenda la información de estos documentos esenciales. Le proporcionaremos esta información en su 

idioma preferido sin costo alguno. Solicite servicios de traducción o interpretación por correo electrónico 

a AskMSHA@dol.gov o por teléfono: 202-693-9400.
#### Janet Marie CUDDY, Administratrix of the Estate of James R. Cuddy, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY.

No. 14746.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 21, 1964.

Decided May 4, 1964.

David F. Binder, Philadelphia, Pa. (Bernstein, Bernstein, Levy & Harrison, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Paul S. Parsons, Baltimore, Md. (Horace G. Ports, Anderson, Ports, May,. Beers & Blakey, York, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no' error. The Order of the District Court of December 6, 1963 setting aside the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff and directing entry of judgment in favor of the defendant will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Follmer in his Memorandum Opinion, 220 F. Supp. 443.