alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q FOR
PERIOD ENDING APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000             APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         676,899               3,994,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,180                  70,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,473,833               1,753,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,572,901               6,094,560
<PP&E>                                       3,925,178               3,753,779
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,026,989               2,467,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,471,090               7,380,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,323,186               1,736,232
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        78,435                  77,402
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,471,090               7,380,769
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               422,549                 272,134
<CGS>                                          109,967                 124,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,512,821               2,268,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             319,029                  14,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,495,320)             (2,070,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,495,320)             (2,070,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)                  (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)                  (0.27)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among Morgan Stanley
Capital I, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Citibank, N.A. as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association as Custodian and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, relating to Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C17 (MSBAM
2014-C17)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein
certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of August 14, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and
if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  |  |  | Date: March 5, 2015
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |  |  |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

LINDON CAMPBELL , Appellant,

v.

ALLY FINANCIAL INC. f/k/a GMAC , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 58

[ November 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ellen Feld

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. COWE17

- 013256 and CACE19

- 12233

.
Lindon Campbell, Coral Springs, pro se.

Christina V. Paradowski of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , L EVINE and K UNTZ , JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 15,153.

#### Kinningham *v.*The State.

Criminal *Law.*— Arson.—Attempt *to Commit.*— The statute relating to arson, B. S. 1881, section 1927, prescribes no penalty for an attempt to commit arson, and the offence defined is complete, and the penalty enforceable, only when property is actually burned.

Prom the Decatur Circuit Court

*J. S. Seobey,*for appellant.

Elliott, C. J.

This case is here for the second time— *Kinningham*v. *State, 119*Ind. 332. When it was here before, the appellant’s contention was, that the indictment was bad, because it did not state the facts constituting the crime of an attempt to commit arson, and this contention we sustained. The point is made, on the indictment before us on this appeal, that the statute does not prescribe any penalty for an attempt to commit arson, and we are reluctantly driven to sustain the appellant’s position on this question.

The statute is confused and lame. R. S. 1881, section 1927. The offence, really defined, is complete, and the penalty enforceable, only when property is actually burned ; for, in one place, and that a controlling one, the provision is : “ The property so burned being of the value'of twenty dollars or upwards.” The effect of this provision is to make it essential that property of the value of twenty dollars should be, burned, for unless property of that value is actually burned, there is no offence which can be punished.

But there is another clause which must not be overlooked, mid that is the one fixing the penalty, which reads, thus: •• And upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the State prison not more than twenty-one years nor less than one year, and fined not exceeding double the value of the property destroyed.” It is impossible to escape the conclu*323sion that the penalty can not be enforced unless some property has been actually destroyed, or injured, by fire.

Piled Oct. 15, 1889.

There is no elasticity in statutes defining criminal offences, - and their meaning can not be enlarged by construction, nor can the courts supply omissions; that can only be done by the Legislature. Where there is no penalty denounced for a statutory crime, none can be prescribed by the judiciary.

The judgment must be, and is, reversed.
#### JANE ZIVNEY INTERIORS, LTD., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. REGISTER OF CONTRACTORS, an administrative agency of the State of Arizona; Alan A. Felber, Chief of Licensing for the Registrar of Contractors; Robert Dragoon, Inspector for the Registrar of Contractors; Jim Polokoff, Inspector for the Registrar of Contractors, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 00-15988.

D.C. No. CV-00-00394-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2001.1

Decided Jan. 11, 2001.

Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)

MEMORANDUM2

This appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our inquiry is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the preliminary injunction or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. *Does 1-5 v. Chandler,*83 F.3d 1150, 1152 (9th Cir.1996).

The record before us shows that the district court did not err in concluding that the requirements for *Younger*abstention are met in this case. *Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 40 — 41, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction.3

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

3

. Appellees’ motion to strike is denied as un*706necessary.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).
    Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
October 14, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> September 8, 2010.

B. New Business

    <bullet> Policy Statement on Cooperative Operating Philosophy--
Serving the Members of the Farm Credit System Institutions.
    <bullet> Board Resolution on Cooperative Operating Philosophy.
    <bullet> Joint and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement--Notice 
of Approval.
    <bullet> Merger of Farm Credit of North Florida, and Farm Credit of 
Southwest Florida, ACAs, and their subsidiaries with and into Farm 
Credit of South Florida, ACA, and its subsidiaries.

C. Reports

    <bullet> OE Quarterly Report on the Farm Credit System.

Closed Session*

Reports

    Report on Institutions' Supervisory, Enforcement, and
    <bullet> Oversight Activities.

    *Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).

    Dated: October 7, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-25765 Filed 10-7-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# Date and Time:

Wednesday, October 13, 2010, 9:30 a.m. (local time), 3:30 a.m. (EDT). 

# Place:

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Headquarters, Editorial Room 4-34, Vinohradska 159A, 100 00 Prague 10, Czech Republic. 

# Subject:

Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors. 

# Summary:

                        The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at the time and location listed above. The BBG will be considering Board By-Laws, a Calendar Year 2011 meeting schedule, Strategy and Budget Committee recommendations, and a Governor's trip report. The meeting is open to the public—but due to space limitations via Webcast only—and will be streamed on the BBG's Web site at                         *http://www.bbg.gov*. The meeting will also be made available on the BBG's Web site for on-demand viewing by 9:30 a.m. EDT.                     

# Contact Person for More Information:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545. 

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey, 

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-25473 Filed 10-5-10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

1.                  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: June 11, 2007
|                        |
|------------------------|
| /s/ Robert B.  Goergen |   |

Robert B. Goergen

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

----
585 A.2d 380

#### SHARON L. GRENELL v. MARTIN G. SIMMONS.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 226

#### THE RECTOR, WARDENS AND VESTRYMEN OF THE CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION OF JERSEY CITY, ETC., v. THE DIOCESE OF NEWARK, ETC., ET AL.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 11


                           IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                                              August 31,            August 31,
                                                          ------------------    -----------------
                                                           1996       1995       1996       1995
                                                           ----       ----       ----       ----
Primary and fully diluted earnings per share
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>  
     Weighted average number of issued shares
       outstanding                                        4,734      4,734      4,734      4,667
Effect of:
     1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan                           --         --         --         --
     1994 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
                                                             --         --         --         --
                                                         ------     ------     ------     ------
Shares outstanding used to compute primary and fully
     diluted earnings per share                           4,734      4,734      4,734      4,667
                                                         ======     ======     ======     ======

Net Income                                               $  419     $  373     $1,141     $1,036
                                                         ======     ======     ======     ======

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share             $ 0.09     $ 0.08     $ 0.24     $ 0.22
                                                         ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Helius
Medical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2015 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Philippe Deschamps, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Amanda Tseng, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: June 29, 2015                                      | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                         | 
|                                                         | 
|/s/ Philippe
      Deschamps                             | 
|                                                         | 
|Philippe Deschamps                                       | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and a
      Director | 
|                                                         | 
|/s/ Amanda Tseng                                         | 
|                                                         | 
|Amanda Tseng                                             | 
|Chief Financial Officer                                  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Helius Medical
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Helius Medical Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---