alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of APO Health, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Morton
Berger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to APO Health, Inc. and will be retained by APO Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: August 15, 2005
                                          Name: Morton Berger
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 961 

To prohibit aquaculture in the Great Lakes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit aquaculture in the Great Lakes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban Aquaculture in 

5 the Great Lakes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AQUACULTURE IN THE GREAT 

7 LAKES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, a person shall not engage in aquaculture in 

10 the Great Lakes. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 961 IH

1 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

2 shall administer this section. 

3 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) AQUACULTURE.—The term ‘‘aquaculture’’ 

5 means the propagation or rearing (or both) of aquat6 ic species in a controlled or selected environment. 

7 The term does not include any fish hatchery oper8 ated by a Federal or State agency. 

9 (2) GREAT LAKES.—The term ‘‘Great Lakes’’ 

10 means Lake Ontario, Lake Erie, Lake Huron, Lake 

11 St. Clair, Lake Michigan, and Lake Superior, in12 cluding the connecting waters thereof, to the extent 

13 that those lakes or waters, respectively, are subject 

14 to the jurisdiction of the United States. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

16 at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2
I, Alan B. Levan, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004
By: /s/ Alan B. Levan
585 A.2d 361

#### JOSEPH J. DURANTE, ET AL. v. JANINE BUCCA.

August 7, 1990.

Leave to appeal granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Chancery Division, Family Part, for reconsideration of plaintiffs’ claim for visitation, in the light of *N.J.S.A.*9:2-7.1 and *Thompson v. Vanaman,*212 *N.J.Super.*596, 515 *A.*2d 1254 (App.Div.1986).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 28, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Clifford Stanford, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *Stuart and Teresa Gibson, both of Canton, Georgia;*                     to acquire control of First Cherokee Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of First Cherokee State Bank, both of Woodstock, Georgia.                

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Robert A. Engen and Beverly J. Engen, both of Tolna, North Dakota, individually and as part of a group acting in concert with Steven R. Engen, Bismarck, North Dakota;*                     to retain and acquire control of Tolna Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain and acquire control of The Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Tolna, both of Tolna, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 8, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-25857 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
584 A.2d 226

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALISON TOWEY.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 244 *N.J.Super.*582, 583 A.2d 352)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         512,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  865,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,377,680
<PP&E>                                      15,781,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                 522,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,636,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,461,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,636,656
<SALES>                                        472,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                405,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            405,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   405,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PIERO A. BUGONI,

Appellant,

v.

PAM BONDI, TAYLOR O’BRIEN, LINDSAY TURNBULL, 

SHARON BILU and JOHN MEGALLY,

Appellees.

No. 4D16-4242

[November 16, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16 000420.

Piero A. Bugoni, Boca Raton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carrol Y. Cherry 

Eaton, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee 

Pam Bondi. 

Richard C. McCrea, Jr., of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for 

appellees Taylor O'Brien, Lindsay Turnbull, Sharon Bilu and John 

Megally.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### :.•'-.. , gt.i&lZr.Ol r, ' • • ^ i 

### ^Cvr Tn^ft\*p\VlCQ^W

-l , s vq^-u~\v-o\o^ Hoars ^sU^VV^ ^kAVx^tMi% 

### BkkC_CC 

### vXuAso^w^ \%yn^^G> COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS JAN 20"::;5 Ab©6Acosia,Oerr
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Lustros Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TrishaMalone, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

*/s/ Trisha Malone*

By: Trisha Malone

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: August 20, 2012

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bradley T Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: October 26, 2005                  /s/ Bradley T Nielson
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Bradley T Nielson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

# Name:

Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee (#66).

# Date/Time:

November 3, 2010 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

November 4, 2010 8 a.m.-6 p.m.

November 5, 2010 8 a.m.-3 p.m.

# Place:

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230:

November 5, Room 1005.

November 6, Room 1235.

November 7, Room 1235.

# Type of Meeting:

Open.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8807.

# Purpose of Meeting:

To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

# Agenda:

Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate (11/3).

Update on current status of Directorate.

Reports from liaisons with other Advisory Committees.

Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate.

Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Areas.

# Summary Minutes:

May be obtained from the contact person listed above.

 Dated: October 7, 2010.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-25685 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pehong Chen, the Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer of BroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:**1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, and towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2. **The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 15th day ofDecember 2006.   /s/ Pehong Chen Pehong Chen  Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**Trico
      Marine Services, Inc.**


**Form
      10-Q**


**Quarterly
      Report**


**Quarterly
      Period Ended March 31, 2006**











**Certifications
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Trevor
      Turbidy, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the “Company”),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                May 5, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Trevor TurbidyTrevor
                TurbidyChief
                Executive Officer



















**Certifications
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Geoff
      Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the “Company”),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                May 5, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Geoff JonesGeoff
                JonesChief
                Financial Officer
No. 14,843.

#### McCracken *v.*Cabel et al.

Appeal.— *Will not Lie after Receiving Part of Judgment.*— Where a judgment defendant pays to the clerk of the court the amount of the judgment, and the plaintiff’s attorney, prior to being discharged, receives from the clerk the amount of his lien for services, the plaintiff is precluded by section 632, K. S. 1881, from thereafter taking an appeal from the judgment.

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

*A. J. Padgett*and *A.*Pag'et, for appellant.

*W. jR. Gardiner*and *S. H. Taylor,*for appellees.

Coffey, J.

This was a proceeding instituted in the Daviess Circuit Court by the appellees to condemn land for a right of way for a lateral railroad under section 3987, R. S. 1881, with a view of reaching a coal mine in said county.

The report made by the viewers appointed by the court was excepted to by the appellant John McCracken, over whose -land the proposed railroad ran, and the cause, as to him, was tried in the circuit court by a jury, who returned a verdict in his favor for the sum of $320.45, upon which judgment was rendered. His attorneys of record, Messrs. Baker *267and Padgett, took a lien upon said judgment for the sum of $150, their fees for obtaining said judgment.

Filed Oct. 8, 1889.

The appellees paid to the clerk of the court the full amount of the said judgment, interest, and costs, and the said clerk paid to the said Baker and Padgett $150 of the money so collected on the judgment, and they receipted him therefor.

Subsequently this appeal was taken, and the appellees now move to dismiss the appeal, under the provisions of section «32, R. S. 1881.

That section provides that appeals may be taken from the ■circuit courts and superior courts to the Supreme Court by either party from all final judgments, except in actions originating before a justice of the peace or mayor of a city, where the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed fifty dollars: *Provided, however,*That the party obtaining judgment shall not take an appeal after receiving any money paid or collected thereon.

This statute would seem to be conclusive upon the question here involved. It is not denied by the appellant that his attorneys had authority to receive and receipt for any and all moneys collected on the judgment obtained by them for him. Their receipt for the money at any time before they were discharged bound their client and relieved the clerk from any liability to the judgment plaintiff.

Upon the principle that the client is.bound by the acts of his attorney when the act is within the scope of the attorney’s employment, we think it must be held that the appellant had accepted money upon the judgment which he seeks to reverse upon this appeal, before the appeal was taken. The money was paid in July, 1888, and the appeal was not taken until March, 1889. We think the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained. *Clark*v. *Wright,*67 Ind. 224 ; *Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co.*v. *Johnson,*84 Ind. 420; *Sterne v. Vert,*108 Ind. 232; *Sterne*v. *Vert,*111 Ind. 408.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.