alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Physician Assistants Week, 2010 

In communities across our Nation, physician assistants serve tirelessly everyday to care for Americans and fulfill a critical function in our health care system.  They provide important medical attention and treatment to patients and their loved ones, and can be the principal care provider in rural or inner-city clinics, and other settings with provider shortages. During National Physician Assistants Week, we honor these dedicated medical professionals and their essential role in providing diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive health care services to millions of American men, women, and children. 

With compassion matched by professionalism, physician assistants work as part of a team to provide vital support to both patients in need and the doctors who balance the care of many individuals.  Recognizing their essential function in our medical system, we allocated more than $30 million from the Prevention and Public Health Fund under the Affordable Care Act to expand the Physician Assistant Training Program, and to increase the number of physician assistants in primary care over the next 5 years.  Primary care is the foundation of preventive health care, and we must support the training of hundreds of new physician assistants who can join the medical field and increase access to providers and services in underserved areas.  Our Nation needs a strong primary care workforce and the continued dedication of physician assistants in our hospitals, clinics, and medical offices to address the crucial health issues of our time. 

Countless American families have relied on the skill, concern, and commitment of physician assistants, in both joyous times and heart-wrenching circumstances.  As we recognize their countless contributions this week, we also pay tribute to the kind and meticulous care provided by all of America’s medical professionals.  Our Nation is stronger because of these invaluable workers, and their efforts safeguard a healthy future for all Americans. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6 through October 12, 2010, as National Physician Assistants Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs that honor and foster appreciation for our physician assistants and all medical professionals. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25706

Billing code 3195-W1-P
Order entered November ,2012

In The

No. 05-12-00647-CR

STACY EUGENE ERVIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80634-12

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 22, 2012, ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent; (3) counsel explained he was not getting notices

because the Court had the wrong mailing address and e-mail address for him; and (4) appellant’s

brief can be filed by December 12, 2012.

We DIRECT the Clerk to show the mailing address for appeHant’s counsel as 7004

Bishop Road, Number 3423, Piano, Texas 75024 and his e-mail

address as

CarltonHughes@aol.com.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by DECEMBER 12, 2012.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send cop~es of this order, by electromc transrmss~on, to

counsel for all parties.

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6140

WILLIAM STEVEN GAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN B. TAYLOR, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1267-AM) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Steven Gay, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Steven Gay seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Gay v. Taylor , No. CA-98-1267-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Richard PANARIELLO and Ann Panariello, Petitioners, v. Hans S. PATE, Karolina Pate, his wife, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Florida corporation, Respondents.

No. 2D10-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 23, 2011.

*918Caryn L. Bellus and Wendi M. Weiner of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Miami, for Petitioners.

Robert L. Donald of Law Office of Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers, for Respondents Hans S. Pate and Karolina Pate.

No appearance for Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

KELLY and WALLACE, JJ„ Concur.

BLACK, J., Dissents with opinion.

BLACK, Judge,

Dissenting.

In my opinion, *Kash N’ Karry Food Stores, Inc. v. Smart,*814 So.2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), requires granting the requested relief.
584 A.2d 215

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TERRENCE BYRD.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 11


                            IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Three Months Ended
                                                                            February 28,
                                                                         ------------------
                                                                           1999       1998
                                                                         -------    -------
<S>                                                                      <C>        <C>    
Net Income                                                               $   374    $   388
                                                                         =======    =======

Weighted average number of issued shares outstanding                       4,734      4,734
                                                                         =======    =======
                                                                           4,734      4,734
Shares used in computation of basic earnings per common stock

Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and stock warrants after
   application of treasury stock method                                        0          8
                                                                         -------    -------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding-diluted                    4,734      4,742
                                                                         =======    =======

Basic and diluted earnings per common share                              $   .08    $   .08
                                                                         =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                       12
3

2

MSHA Impact Inspection List 

(December 2023) 

Mine Information Type of Issuance S&S Information Issuances - Type of Action Justifications 

District State 

Coal/ 

MNM Mine ID Controller Name Operator Name Mine Name Colu 

Citations

Orders

Safeguards (Coal only) 

Total 

Colu 

S&S

Non-S&S

Total

S&S 

Rate 

Colu 

104(a) Citation

104(b) Order

104(d)(1) Citation

104(d)(1) Order104(d)(2) Order

104(e)(2) Order

314(b) Safeguard

103(k) Order

104(g)(1) Order

103(j) Order 

107(a) Order

Total 

Colu 

1. Operator Tactics 

2. Hazard Complaints /Hotline Calls 

3. Plan Compliance Issues 

4. Inadequate Exams

5. Accidents, Injuries, Illnesses

6. Fatal Accidents

7. Enforcement History 

8. Adverse Conditions

9. Respirable Dust Issues

10. Operational Changes 

Barbourville KY M 1504469 Eagle Materials Inc Kosmos Cement Company, LLC Kosmos Cement Plant 7 0 0 7 0 7 7 0.00% 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 x 

Beckley WV C 4608787 Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc Nicholas Contura LLC Jerry Fork Eagle 13 0 0 13 1 12 13 7.69% 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 x 

Birmingham AL M 0100027 Vicat S A National Cement Co., of AL., Inc. NATIONAL CEMENT COMPANY 48 0 0 48 9 39 48 18.75% 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 x x x x 

Dallas TX M 4100009 Jack A Carson Cactus Canyon Quarries Inc Fairland Plant & Qys 12 0 0 12 0 12 12 0.00% 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 x 

Denver UT M 4202629 Darin J Christensen Christensen Ready Mix South Town 31 0 0 31 7 24 31 22.58% 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 x 

Duluth WI M 4700587 Graymont Ltd Graymont (WI) LLC Graymont Superior Lime Plant 8 0 0 8 1 7 8 12.50% 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 x x 

Lakewood UT M 4201989 David Taylor Miracle Rock Mining ROCKLAND MINE 10 0 0 10 3 7 10 30.00% 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 x x 

Madisonville MO M 2300188 Buzzi Unicem S P A River Cement Company dba Buzzi Unicem USA Selma Plant Quarry & Mill 30 1 0 31 8 23 31 25.81% 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 31 x x 

Morgantown WV C 4601433 ACNR Holdings, Inc Marion County Coal Resources, Inc. Marion County Mine 7 0 0 7 2 5 7 28.57% 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 x x 

Mt. Pleasant PA C 3609437 J Clifford Forrest III Rosebud Mining Company Brush Valley 3 0 0 3 2 1 3 66.67% 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 x 

Norton KY C 1519838 Alliance Resource Partners LP Excel Mining Excel #5 18 2 0 20 9 11 20 45.00% 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 x x x x x x 

Pineville WV C 4605909 John M Potter Coal-Mac LLC Holden No 22 Preparation Plant 8 0 0 8 3 5 8 37.50% 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 x 

Pineville WV C 4608563 John M Potter Coal-Mac LLC Ragland Loadout 7 0 0 7 2 5 7 28.57% 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 x 

Vacaville NV M 2602142 MCC Development Corporation Nevada Ready Mix Corporation Lone Mountain Pit 15 0 0 15 2 13 15 13.33% 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 x 

Vincennes IN M 1202261 Heidelberg Cement AG Heidelberg Materials Midwest Agg, Inc. Monon Quarry 9 0 0 9 3 6 9 33.33% 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 x 

Warrendale NY M 3003434 Roderick J Valente R J Valente Gravel R J Valente Grafton Quarry 18 0 0 18 5 13 18 27.78% 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 x x 

Total Mines 16 National Totals 244 3 0 247 57 190 247 23.08% 243 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 247 3 1 2 3 4 0 12 2 1 1 

Last Updated 1/11/2024
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           WHG RESORTS & CASINOS INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES & PARTNERSHIPS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 % Ownership
                                                 by WHG R&C          Date and
                                                 (Unless otherwise   Jurisdiction  Jurisdictions
Name & Tax ID No.          Type of Business      noted)              Organized     Qualified
-----------------          ----------------      -----------------   ---------     ---------
<S>                        <C>                   <C>                 <C>           <C>
SUBSIDIARIES

El Conquistador            Ferryboat Shuttle     100% by WHGI        9/30/93       - -
Ferryboat Inc.                                                       Puerto Rico
66-0499293

ESJ Hotel                  Holding company       100% by             6/4/84        Puerto Rico
Corporation                                      PPRA                Delaware      4/14/97
13-3237264

Isla Verde Tourism         Parking Lot           100% by             11/6/92       - -
Parking Corp.              Concession Holder     PPRA                Puerto Rico

Posadas de Puerto          Hotel and casino      100%                6/13/83       Puerto Rico
Rico Associates,           ownership                                 Delaware      7/15/83
Incorporated
66-0401424

Posadas Finance            Holding company       100% by             8/12/88       - -
Corporation                                      PPRA                Delaware
52-1635050

WHG El Con Corp.           Holding company       100%                10/11/89      - -
06-1288059                                                           Delaware
(Name change 4/2/97
from WMS El Con Corp)

Williams                   Hotel management      62%                 6/13/83       Puerto Rico
Hospitality Group Inc.                           by PPRA             Delaware      7/5/83
66-0408507

PARTNERSHIPS:

El Conquistador            Hotel and casino      50%                 01/16/90
Partnership L.P.           ownership             by WKA              Delaware
06-1288145                                       23.3% WHG R&C

Las Casitas                El Conquistador       50% by              4/27/93       - -
Development                Condominium           WKA El Con          Puerto Rico
Company I, S               development           Associates
en C (S.E.)
66-0494027

Posadas de San             Hotel and casino      50% by              07/30/84
Juan Associates            ownership             ESJ Hotel           New York
66-041121

WKA Development,           Real Estate           98% WHGI            6/1/91        - -
S.E.                       Holding Company       2% WKA El Con       Puerto Rico
66-0476163                                       Associates

WKA El Con                 Partner in El         46.54% by           01/09/90
Associates                 Conquistador L.P.     WHG El Con          New York
06-1288143                                       Corp.
</TABLE>
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM2014-CCRE19 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and Berkeley Point CapitalLLC, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2018

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT E. BUTLER.

October 6, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

h0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142288

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142288 COA: 297955 Shiawassee CC: 02-007690-FC TIM ALLEN RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 12.3  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Vitor Fagá de Almeida, certify that:  1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cnova N.V.;  2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.             The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c.Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.             The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Vitor Fagá de AlmeidaVitor Fagá de AlmeidaChief Financial OfficerDate: March 31, 2015