alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.9



|     |  |                                                               
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period
from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 18, 2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Valley Financial Corporation,
certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).

Dated: August 14, 2006



/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3846

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Jack Arlan Calvin, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 30, 2009 Filed: January 7, 2010

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement cont aining an appeal waiver, Jack Calvin pleaded guilty to securities fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The district court 1 sentenced him to 200 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay $2,083,736.41 in res titution. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel argues that the dist rict court committed procedural error in calculating the Guidelines range because it improperly applied a 2-level enhancement-2- for sophisticated means, and that the c ourt abused its discretion because the 200- month sentence was greater than necessary to fulfill the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Calvin has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising similar arguments.
Upon careful review, we conclude that Calvin knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreemen t and the appeal waiver, thatthe issues raised on appeal fall within the scope of the appeal waiver, and that enforcing the appeal waiver would not result in a miscarri age of justice. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889- 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (stating circumstances in wh ich court will enforce appeal waiver; noting miscarriage-of-justice ex ception is narrow and does not swallow general rule that waivers of appellate rights are valid); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case).
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal beyond the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal. We grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition th at counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

On Stage Entertainment, Inc.

4625 Nevso Drive

Las Vegas, Nevada 89103

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (file number 333-56285) and in the Registration Statementon Form S-8 (file number 333-80283)  ofour report dated March 30, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of On Stage Entertainment,Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the yearended December 31, 2000.

 

BDO Seidman, LLP

Los Angeles, California

December 3, 2001
585 A.2d 384

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY PUCHALSKI.

October 2, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF JOURNAL REGISTER COMPANY AT DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                               3,090
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       71,890
<ALLOWANCES>                         6,293
<INVENTORY>                          9,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    88,397
<PP&E>                             246,836
<DEPRECIATION>                     141,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     687,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               72,880
<BONDS>                            731,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               484
<OTHER-SE>                        (207,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       687,180
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   469,565
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      263,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    28,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     4,257
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  52,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     79,585
<INCOME-TAX>                        31,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 47,665
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        47,665
<EPS-BASIC>                            1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.02





</TABLE>
584 A.2d 243

#### IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS FROM A STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
#### In re Dustin L. POCHE.

No. 2010-OB-2313.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 2010.

JjON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR

PER CURIAM.*

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Dustin L. Poche, is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. The term of this conditional admission shall be for five years from the date of admission.

2. During the period of this conditional admission, petitioner shall be monitored by the Lawyers Assistance Program (LAP).

3. Petitioner shall be responsible for ensuring that monthly reports of his progress and participation in LAP are forwarded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

4. Within forty-five days prior to the expiration of the conditional admission, the Executive Director of LAP shall forward to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (a) a final report of petitioner’s progress and participation in LAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner’s continued participation in LAP.

5. Within thirty days prior to the expiration of the conditional admission, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

| j>6. Petitioner shall cooperate with LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon him by LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 784 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 784

To amend title 28 of the United States Code to exclude the State of New 
Jersey from the prohibition on professional and amateur sports gambling 
        to the extent approved by the legislature of the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

  Mr. Pallone (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28 of the United States Code to exclude the State of New 
Jersey from the prohibition on professional and amateur sports gambling 
        to the extent approved by the legislature of the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Jersey Betting and Equal 
Treatment Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FROM THE PROHIBITION ON 
              AMATEUR AND PROFESSIONAL SPORTS GAMBLING TO THE EXTENT 
              APPROVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE.

    Section 3704(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, 
        or waging scheme operating exclusively in the State of New 
        Jersey, to the extent such scheme is approved by the 
        legislature of the State by statute.''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by this Act apply to conduct occurring on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11



                           IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                                           August 31,             August 31,
                                                      ------------------       ----------------
                                                       1998         1997       1998        1997
                                                       ----         ----       ----        ----

<S>                                                   <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>   
Net Income                                            $  554      $  470      $1,499      $1,239

Weighted average number of issued shares
   outstanding                                         4,734       4,734       4,734       4,734
Shares used in computation of basic earnings
   per common stock                                    4,734       4,734       4,734       4,734
                                                      ======      ======      ======      ======


Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and
   stock warrants after application of treasury
   stock method                                           24           0          12           0
                                                      ------      ------      ------      ------
Common and common equivalent shares
   outstanding-diluted                                 4,758       4,734       4,746       4,734
                                                      ======      ======      ======      ======
Basic earnings per common share                       $  .12      $  .10      $  .32      $  .26
                                                      ======      ======      ======      ======

Diluted earnings per common share                     $  .12      $  .10      $  .32      $  .26
                                                      ======      ======      ======      ======
</TABLE>



                                       11
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                            1,311,000
<SECURITIES>                                      9,397,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,395,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (154,000)
<INVENTORY>                                         249,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14,389,000
<PP&E>                                            2,343,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1,073,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   20,218,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,697,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       18,185,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     20,218,000
<SALES>                                           1,100,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,394,000
<CGS>                                               658,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,121,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      4,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     277,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        111,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 166,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        166,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .03



</TABLE>
584 A.2d 204

#### EDGARDO VASCONI, ETC. v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. LEAH (VASCONI) WOLF.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
585 A.2d 373

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARL THOMPSON.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
868 A.2d 1011

#### IN THE MATTER OF GARY E. BOTCHMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 000991987).

March 15, 2005.

ORDER

GARY E. BOTCHMAN of NORTHVALE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GARY E. BOTCHMAN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by GARY E. BOTCHMAN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of time extension.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Highway Administration wishes to announce a 45 day extension for the Comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the I-5 North Coast Corridor (I-5NCC) Project. The present closing day for comments is October 2, 2010. This additional period would extend the comment period to November 22, 2010.

This project is 27 miles in length through 6 lagoons and six cities within the Coastal Zone. This is a large complex document that incorporates extensive technical studies within this environmentally sensitive corridor.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cesar E. Perez, Senior Transportation Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, California Division, 650 Capitol Mall, Rm. 4-100, Sacramento, CA 95747, (916) 498-5065,                         *Cesar.perez@dot.gov.*

                        Shay Lynn Harrison, Chief, Environmental Analysis Branch C, 4050 Taylor St., San Diego, CA 92110, (619) 688-0190,                         *Shay.Lynn.Harrison@dot.ca.gov.*

Issued on: September 23, 2010.

Cindy Vigue,

Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, California.

[FR Doc. 2010-24469 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
584 A.2d 233

#### PAUL PRUSINSKI v. BLOOMFIELD ZONING BOARD.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 215

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES SPIKES.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2014 (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate
administrator (the Certificate Administrator), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

1. A
review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 27, 2017



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director


CGCMT 2014-GC23
585 A.2d 407

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE ANTHONY ROWE.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.