alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,454,524
<SECURITIES>                                 4,248,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                  602,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,330
<INVENTORY>                                  3,344,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,433,121
<PP&E>                                       1,005,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                 362,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,655,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,641
<BONDS>                                        423,293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,754
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,931,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,655,782
<SALES>                                        803,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               803,828
<CGS>                                          421,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  421,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,411,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,837,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,837,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,837,428)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.8



|     |  |                                                                          
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | CMBS Department MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis. MN 55414

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10013

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian for the Selig Portfolio Loan Combination (in such capacities,
Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the reporting period):



| | (a) | A review of Wells Fargos activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement(s)) has been made
under my supervision; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 27, 2015



|                
|----------------
|/s/ Gail Vannest
|Gail Vannest    
|Vice President  



---

To: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

Schedule A

List of
Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORPORATION II, Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Certificate Administrator,
and Custodian, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, Trustee relating to the Series GSMS 2014-GC22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the Selig Portfolio Loan Combination, a Pari passu portion of which is included in the
Series CGCMT 2014-GC23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.



---

To: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

Schedule B

Material
Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-199513) and Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No.333-212708) of our reports dated March 22, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements of DBV Technologies S.A. and subsidiary (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

/s/ Deloitte & Associés 

Represented by Julien Razungles 

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France 

March 22, 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BETTY WRIGHT,

Petitioner

v.

TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 503 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of February, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Janie S. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated January 6, 2005 |  | /s/ Janie S. Brown     
|                      |  | Janie S. Brown         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTOINETTE YURKOW.

December 18, 1987.

Leave to appeal granted, and the order of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to the extent that defendant having been found indigent, the Office of the Public Defender is directed to have the necessary transcripts prepared and to assist defendant in the prosecution of her pro se appeal.
Filed 12/1/99 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1999 ND 208

Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Joe A. Johnson, Defendant and Appellee

No. 990241

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Norman J. Backes, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Louis Charles Hamilton, II, pro se.  Submitted on brief.

Mark R. Fraase and Douglas W. Nesheim, Wegner, Fraase, Nordeng, Johnson & Ramstad, 15 South Ninth Street, Fargo, ND 58103, for defendant and appellee.  Submitted on brief.

Hamilton v. Johnson

No. 990241

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Louis Charles Hamilton, II appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his action against Joe A. Johnson alleging legal malpractice, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom
585 A.2d 322

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM S. NIXON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

February 11, 1991.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that WILLIAM S. NIXON, of ABERDEEN, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1982, be suspended from the practice of law for the commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his fitness to practice law, specifically, possession of marijuana and cocaine, in violation of *RPC*8.4(b), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted, and WILLIAM S. NIXON is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 1, 1991; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*291ORDERED that respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guideline Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Johan P. Finley,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PDS Gaming Corporation, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDS Gaming Corporation;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   [Omitted];

(c)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  | August 13, 2004                                          |   | /s/ Johan P.  Finley |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|   | Johan P. Finley, *Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      40,379,279
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,216,339
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            91,349,680
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                107,341,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,169,314
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,028,990
<LOANS>                                    690,305,942
<ALLOWANCE>                                 10,501,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             980,916,524
<DEPOSITS>                                 827,952,330
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,501,735
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,744,660
<LONG-TERM>                                 55,131,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,167,997
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,595,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             980,916,524
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             50,725,681
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,575,133
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,847,626
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            58,201,300
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          21,861,217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,755,885
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       33,584,198
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,459,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             512,837
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             23,253,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,369,329
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  14,369,329
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,973,247
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.22
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,304,087
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             9,317,788
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  563,987
<RECOVERIES>                                   288,419
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           10,501,221
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        10,501,221
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1046

BENJAMIN F. RUSSELL, By Joseph Michael Russell as his next

friend,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL GENNARI, Ph.D.; ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF AMERICA,

INCORPORATED, 

Defendants - Appellees,

and

EVONNE FEI; DIXIE SHIELDS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:07-cv-00793-GBL-BRP)

Submitted: June 18, 2008 Decided: July 15, 2008

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Michael Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael E. Olszewski,

Armand B. Alacbay, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Fairfax,
-2-

Virginia; Anthony F. Shelley, Adam P. Feinberg, Jeffrey Hahn,

MILLER & CHEVALIER, CHARTERED, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-3-

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Russell, on behalf of his son, Benjamin F.

Russell, appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action

alleging negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. Gennari,

No. 1:07-cv-00793-GBL-BRP (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-3337-000]


Ridgewind Power Partners, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 6, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Ridgewind Power Partners, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 26, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd9dacddcd0f1f3f6f1facceaefeff0edebdff9faedfcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23656671606c4d4f4a4d46705653534c515763454651400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25796 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
VIRGINIA:

 In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court 

Building in the City of Richmond on Friday, the 11th day of May, 

2001. 

Magco of Maryland, Inc., Appellant, 

 against Record No. 002146 

 Court of Appeals No. 2377-99-4 

John Mills Barr, Commissioner of 

Labor and Industry, Appellee. 

Upon an appeal from a judgment rendered by the 

Court of Appeals of Virginia on the 1st day of August, 

2000. 

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of 

counsel, the Court is of opinion that it cannot reach the merits 

of the issues raised by the assignments of error. 

The Court of Appeals determined not only that the knowledge 

of the appellant’s supervisor regarding hazards on the work site 

may be imputed to the appellant, but also that the senior 

officers of the appellant knew or should have known of those 

hazards. Magco of Maryland, Inc. v. Barr, 33 Va. App. 78, 85, 

531 S.E.2d 614, 617-18 (2000). The appellant did not assign 

error to the finding that the appellant’s senior officers knew 

or should have known of the hazards. Consequently, since there 

is an independent basis for the judgment of the Court of Appeals 

that is not challenged on appeal, this Court cannot reach the 
merits of those errors assigned by the appellant. Rash v. Hilb,

Rogal & Hamilton Co., 251 Va. 281, 286-87, 467 S.E.2d 791, 794-

95 (1996). The judgment of the Court of Appeals is final in 

relation to the issue of knowledge by the appellant’s senior 

officers and bars any appellate relief on the issues raised 

before this Court. United Leasing Corp. v. Thrift Ins. Corp., 

247 Va. 299, 308, 440 S.E.2d 902, 907 (1994). 

 For these reasons, this Court affirms the judgment of the 

Court of Appeals. 

This order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals and 

to the Circuit Court of Arlington County and shall be published 

in the Virginia Reports. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 David B. Beach, 

Clerk
585 A.2d 398

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH N. ZALEWSKI.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 250

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TANYA BROWN.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.