alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | (logo) Deutsche Bank  

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA  92705-4934

 

Tel  714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009

  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2014-CCRE17

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,  U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,  as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A)       A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from May 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”) and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and

B)      That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator     

 

/s/ David Co

BY:  David Co

Title:  Director

Date:  March 1, 2015
### State Counsel for Offenders

A Division of Texas Department of Criminal Justice

P.O. Box 4005 Huntsville, TX 77342-4005 (936) 437-5203

April 21, 2015

Abel Acosta Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78701 VIA E-File

RE: David Schlittler v. The State of Texas CCA Cause No: PD -1505- 14 Trial Cause No: 30390

Dear Mr

. Acosta:

This letter is to advise the Court that I will present oral argument on behalf of the Appellant in the above-described appeal on May 20, 2015 at 9: 00 a.m.

Respectfully,

/s/ Kenneth Nash Kenneth Nash Attorney for Appellant State Counsel for Offenders ken.nash@tdcj.texas.gov

cc: Melinda Fletcher Attorney for the State PD-1505-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/21/2015 11:13:50 AM Accepted 4/21/2015 11:18:38 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
584 A.2d 252

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARVIN WYLE CARTER.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 87-1209.

#### Brown et al. *v.*Alabama et al.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
NO. 12-10-00209-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BONNIE BURNETTE ERWIN,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SHERIFF J.B. SMITH, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Bonnie Burnette Erwin was convicted of capital murder and assessed 

the death penalty (trial court cause number 7-84-174). This conviction was reversed and 

the cause remanded for a new trial. See Erwin v. State, 729 S.W.2d 709, 717 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1987). The case was dismissed in 1989 without being retried. Erwin is currently 

serving a sentence of life without parole plus 105 years after being convicted in federal 

district court (trial court cause number CR 3-48-168-F) of several federal law violations 

including “Continuing Criminal Enterprise.” The kidnapping and murder that formed the 

basis for the capital murder conviction were considered in assessing punishment in the 

federal case. 

Erwin contends that he was wrongfully convicted of capital murder and is entitled 

to compensation. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 103.001–.154 (Vernon 

2005 & Supp. 2009). He filed a civil rights action to establish his alleged wrongful 

conviction. He also filed a motion requesting a court appointed attorney and a second 

motion requesting a court appointed attorney to file a petition for compensation. The trial 

court denied each motion by a written order signed on June 14, 2010, and Erwin filed a 

notice of appeal.
Unless a statute specifically authorizes an interlocutory appeal, Texas appellate 

courts have jurisdiction only over final judgments. Cherokee Water Co. v. Ross, 698 

S.W.2d 363, 365 (Tex. 1985). No statute authorizes the appeal, prior to final judgment, 

of the orders denying Erwin’s motions for appointment of counsel. Therefore, we are 

without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

On July 1, 2010, this court notified Erwin, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 37.2, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final 

judgment or other appealable order. Erwin was further informed that the appeal would be 

dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before 

August 2, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. In response to this court’s notice, 

Erwin filed a document that we have construed as an amended notice of appeal. 

However, this document does not establish the jurisdiction of this court.

Because Erwin has not shown the jurisdiction of this court, the appeal is 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2, 42.3.

 BRIAN HOYLE__ 

 Justice

Opinion delivered August 4, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
866 A.2d 979

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. EVANS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 016541983).

February 23, 2005.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that JOHN A. EVANS of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective October 6, 2004, by Order of this Court filed October 6, 2004, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
Exhibit 15.3



LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.333-201716) on Form S-8 of Kenon Holdings Ltd. of our report dated
29 March 2016, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd. as of 31 December 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income,
changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015, which report appears in the 31 December 2015 annual report on Form 20-F of Kenon Holdings Ltd..



|               
|---------------
|LOGO           
|Shanghai, China
|               
|21 April 2016  



KPMG Huazhen LLP, a Peoples Republic of China partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG
International), a Swiss entity.

LOGOWe are authorized to practise under the name of KPMG Huazhen LLP.

LOGO
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2014-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association




Date:     June 26, 2015




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
#### Randy WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-4842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 2010.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Margaret Good-Earnest, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diane F. Medley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

We affirm the order denying Wilson’s motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure *7853.800(a). With the assistance of the public defender, Wilson argued that the trial court should not have imposed a three-year mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)l., Florida Statutes, on count two of the information for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The information, he argued, did not plead sufficient facts to permit imposition of the mandatory minimum. We hold that Wilson’s claims were conclusively refuted by the written sentencing order which imposed no mandatory minimum sentence for count two. We note that the State and the public defender both failed to note this fact in their briefs on appeal.

*Affirmed.*

GROSS, C.J. and MAY, J., concur.
585 A.2d 397

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES E. BRAXTON.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Stephanie Kay WOFFORD *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-38

966 S.W.2d 266

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 30, 1998

*J. Randolph Shock,*for appellant.

*Winston Bryant,*Att’y Gen., by: *Vada Berger,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Stephanie Kay Wofford pleaded *nolo contendere*to first-degree murder. Her plea was conditional, in accordance with Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), reserving the right to question on appeal the denial of her motion to suppress certain evidence seized from her home. We remanded the case to the Trial Court to determine if officers who first entered Ms. Wofford’s home under exigent circumstances had seen, in plain view, the items seized by other officers who entered the home later and searched it without a warrant. Our holding was that, if the items had been in plain view to the officers first entering, we would affirm. *Wofford v. State,*330 Ark. 8, 952 S.W.2d 646 (1997).

Upon remand, a hearing on the matter was conducted and an order of findings was entered by the Trial Court. The record has been forwarded to us for further action. Accordingly, we will receive additional briefs from the parties. The Clerk of this Court will set a schedule for briefing.
### REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION OCT 25 2016 OSM U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
584 A.2d 254

#### ROBERT NILSEN v. NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD.

June 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
----

----

|   | (1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Goergen                    |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | December 3, 2010                     |

----
HTML Editor


Exhibit 10(g)


 








 


 






1










 








 





 





2










 








 





 





3










 








 





 





4










 








 





 





5










 








 





 





6










 








 





 





7










 








 





 





8










 








 





 





9










 








 





 








10










 








 







 






11










 








 








 


 


 


 


 






12










 








 







 








 


 






13










 











 


 






14










 











 


 






15










 











 


 






16










 















 











17
Exhibit 35.5



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|     |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|LOGO |                        | D1086-120, 12th Floor        
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate
Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-GC22 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of
March 2015.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
585 A.2d 386

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT LEE CUTLER.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G.Christopher Colville, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and AccountingOfficer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

# (2)                                  Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:    July 28, 2004

 
|   | /s/ G.  Christopher Colville               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | G.  Christopher Colville                   |
|   | Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | and  Accounting Officer and Secretary      |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RYAN LEE ZATER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-626, CA-02-946-3-20) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Lee Zater, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ryan Lee Zater seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zater has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3846

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Jack Arlan Calvin, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 30, 2009

Filed: January 7, 2010

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, Jack Calvin

pleaded guilty to securities fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R.

§ 240.10b-5. The district court1

 sentenced him to 200 months in prison and 3 years

of supervised release, and ordered him to pay $2,083,736.41 in restitution. On appeal,

counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel argues that the district court committed procedural error in

calculating the Guidelines range because it improperly applied a 2-level enhancement
-2-

for sophisticated means, and that the court abused its discretion because the 200-

month sentence was greater than necessary to fulfill the purposes of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). Calvin has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising similar arguments.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Calvin knowingly and voluntarily

entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver, that the issues raised on appeal

fall within the scope of the appeal waiver, and that enforcing the appeal waiver would

not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-

92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (stating circumstances in which court will enforce appeal

waiver; noting miscarriage-of-justice exception is narrow and does not swallow

general rule that waivers of appellate rights are valid); see also United States v.

Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal

waiver in Anders case).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal beyond the scope of the waiver.

Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal. We grant defense

counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the

procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

______________________________
585 A.2d 391

#### CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC. v. WILLIAM D. SCHAFFEL.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 229

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ORLANDO FIGUEROA.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 349

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. D.I.B.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBlyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except for the matters set forth in Part II –Item 5 of this Quarterly Report; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus                         |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | December 16, 2004                          |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
585 A.2d 350

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CAROL J. MUNIZ AND LOUIS J. MUNIZ.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.