alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting

by designation. 

**

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20989

 

In re: MITCHELL BERG, 

Debtor,

--------------------

MITCHELL BERG,

Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. SOMMERS, Trustee;

PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC.,

Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CV-4247

 

January 13, 2003

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HUDSPETH*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial

court.
#### James White, Commissioner of Highways, for the Use and Benefit of William Emery, v. Jonathan Boyce.

*Certiorari,*

*■*This case is ruled by *White v. Boyce, ante,*349.

*Certiorari*to review proceedings in justice's court.

Argued October *27,*1891.

Writ dismissed November 13, 1891.

The facts are stated in *White v. Boyce, ante,*349.

*Burritt é Canfield,*for defendant, and petitioner in *certiorari.*

*II. II. Woodruff,*for plaintiff, and respondent in *certiorari.*

Long, J.

The facts in this case are substantially as *354stated in *White v. Boyce, ante,*349. Emery claims to have been injured by the same means that Cottonham, in that suit, claimed to have been injured. Boyce was personally served with the summons by which the suit was commenced in justice’s court,'appeared, and adjourned the suit, and, after judgment there, procured the writ of *certiorari*from this Court directed to the justice’s court.

The writ must be dismissed, under the ruling in the former case, but no costs will be awarded.

Morse and McGrath, JJ., concurred. Ohahplin, C. J., and Grant, J., did not sit.
585 A.2d 380

#### JANET EAST v. JAMES TUCKER.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 
(PDFN) and PDFN Data Coordinating Centers.
    Date: November 5, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Rockville, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6889, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#483a293e21262c3a26082529212466262120662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="176576617e79736579577a767e7b39797e7f39707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25619 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00014

- CR

Clinton Lee GAMBLE
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B17360 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2).
This court must dismiss this appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

We ORDER A ppellant to cause an amended trial court certification to be filed in this court within THIRTY days of the date of this order showing A ppellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d)
, 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State
, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). If no amended trial court certification is filed as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d)

. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7785

EMMANUEL NNOLI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND; WILLIAM C. MILLER, Honorable Judge; PAUL H. WEINSTEIN, Honorable

Judge; JAMES TRIMM, Master; RAYMOND M. KIGHT,

Sheriff; ANDREW L. SONNER, Esquire; JOHN P.

GALLEY, Warden, Montgomery County Detention

Center; ALAN DAVID MEISELMAM, Esquire, and his

law firm, Alan Meiselmam, Incorporated; ALAN

J. NUTA, Esquire, and his law firm, Lan J.

Nuta, Incorporated; RICHARD S. MCKERNON,

Esquire, or his estate; NNENNAYA NNOLI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA95-2750-PJM)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Emmanuel Nnoli, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Penny Whiteford, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore Maryland; Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S

OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Robert William Hesselbacher, Jr.,

SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Alvin Ira Frederick,

ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Stephen Rand,

MCKERNON & RAND, Rockville, Maryland; Patrick J. Hoover, Rockville,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nnoli

v. Maryland, No. CA-95-2750-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 10, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-14T11:51:37Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-14T11:51:40Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-14T11:51:40Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="78474">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-14T11:51:37Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>c 
</p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
AUSTIN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">Hon. Gibb Gilehrist, page 2

Preserites the method ef sale, such method is the cally method
which een be followed. (34 Tes. Juris G11; city of Lubbock
ve Geo. Le. & &éc., 7 8. ve 2d, “{63; beun vy. Pavis,
8. WV. 2028.
The bonds mentioned in were suthorised
ty article 2613e-4, Vernon's ted Civil Statutes (EK. B.
Bo. 338, 47th Legislature). The specifie reference for

found in om 3 of said Act,

The statutes of this Stete prescribe certain bonds
mist be advertised for sale, such as road me ek
such district is loca ee Se ate Sounties

Revised Civil Statutes), but ve find ac such gorleien for. the
sale of A * KR bonds, either in this act or lev.
Therefore, 1% is cus opinion that the bonds aescrt ia your

request may be legally scld vithout atvertising for bids.
Very tray yours
ATTORAEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

/s/ Cland 0. Boothman
BY:

Claud 0. Bcootiwan
Assistant

C0B:V:f>

APPROVED JUH. 6, 19486
/u/ Ccie Speer (Acting)
ATTORKEY GENERAL GF TETAS

APPROVED, OPINION COMMITTES
By: B.W.B., Cheirmen
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

 

     Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Biondvax PharmaceuticalsLtd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

     (i)    theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

     (ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

Dated: April 27, 2016

 

/s/ Uri Ben Or                                

Uri Ben Or

Chief Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT
32.2    CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange
Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States of America Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),
Wong Boon Thye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and of Vershire Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,
to the best of her knowledge:  1.
    The
    Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2015, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
    (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
    the Exchange Act; and  2.
    The information contained in the Periodic
    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of November 10, 2015.   /s/
    Wong Boon ThyeWong Boon ThyeTreasurer,
                               Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
        &
        Director
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-3621

___________________________ Thomas J. Ingrassia lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v. Keith Schafer, Director, Missouri Departme nt of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity; Felix Vincenz, Chief Operati ng Officer, Division of Comprehensive

Psychiatric Services, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity; Julie Inman, Regional Executive Officer, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In Her Official Capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant s Carol Dicknette, Office of Consumer Safety , Missouri Department of Mental Health lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant Leigh Gibson, Office of Consumer Safety , Missouri Department of Mental Health lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Alan Blake, Chief Operating Officer, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity; Jay Englehart, Psychiatrist/Physic ian, Medical Director, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity; Beth We inkein, Dietician II, SORTS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - AppellantsBrenda Swift, Facility Grievance Coordi nator, SORTS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity; Bob Wills, Chief Nurs ing Executive, SORTS; Joe Easter, RN 5, SORTS lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant s Marybeth Rowe, RN 5, SORTS lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant Kevin Fletcher, Risk Management Co mmittee; Kristina Bender, Unit Program Supervisor, SORTS; John Does, Memb ers of Risk Manaagement Committee, Executive Committee, Resident's Rights Review Committee, SORTS lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant s

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: August 15, 2014 Filed: August 20, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Thomas J. Ingrassia sued Keith Schafer and other defe ndants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violation of his constitu tional right to adequate nutrition while incarcerated. The district court denied de fendants qualified immunity. They appeal. See Robbins v. Becker , 715 F.3d 691, 693 (8th Cir. 2013) (“[This court has]
-2-jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s denial of qualified immunity under the collateral order doctrine.”). This court remands the case so that the district court can make findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to permit appellate review of defendants’ qualified immunity defense. See Wright v. United States , 545 Fed. Appx. 588, 589-90 (8th Cir. 2013) (district court must de termine which facts are genuinely disputed and view those facts favorable to the nonmovant); Jones v. McNeese , 675 F.3d 1158, 1160 (8th Cir. 2012) (remanding to the district court “for a more complete articulation of its analysis of [defendant’s] motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity”). * * * * * * * The district court’s order is vacat ed, and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

______________________________

-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         136,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  407,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,135,278
<PP&E>                                       1,157,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,847,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,572,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,085
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,761,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,847,946
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,214
<CGS>                                           59,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               711,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (622,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (622,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (622,410)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR PERIOD ENDING APRIL 3, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999             APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                       3,994,906               5,498,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,496                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,753,725                 511,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,094,560              13,413,945
<PP&E>                                       3,753,779               3,137,042
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,467,570               1,777,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,380,769              14,853,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,763,232                 953,889
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        77,402                  73,687
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,380,769              14,853,255
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,134                       0
<CGS>                                          124,420                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,268,573               2,004,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,570                  24,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,070,205)             (1,841,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,070,205)             (1,841,348)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)                  (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)                  (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Bedford  Bancshares,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2003 (the
"Report") as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission,  we, Harold K.
Neal, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James W. Smith, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
company.


/s/ Harold K. Neal                             /s/ James W. Smith
--------------------------------               ---------------------------------
Harold K. Neal                                 James W. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer          Vice President, Treasurer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


May 14,2003