alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



Dated: November 15, 2004



/s/ A. Wayne LewisChief Financial Officer




36
584 A.2d 209

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES PAZIORA.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
648 A.2d 1127

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAY M. GROSSMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 7, 1994.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that JAY M. GROSSMAN of FAIR LAWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, be publicly disciplined for violations of *RPC*1.1(a) and (b) (gross neglect and pattern of neglect), *RPC*L2(a) (failure to abide by decisions of client), *RPC*1.8 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4 (failure to communicate), *RPC*3.3(a)(1) (false statement of fact to a tribunal), *RPC*4.1(a)(1) (false statement of material facts to a third person), and *RPC*8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) (violation of the *Rules of Professional Conduct,*commission of a criminal act, conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And respondent having admitted the ethical violations charged;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is adopted and JAY M. GROSSMAN of FAIR LAWN, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

*91ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter; and it is further

ORDERED that this Order be published in two consecutive issues of the *New Jersey Law Journal*and the *New Jersey Lawyer*and that the Office of Attorney Ethics cause this Order to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Bergen County on two consecutive days.
exv10w1












Exhibit 10.1




December 30, 2008




Richard P. Kiphart

William Blair & Co.

222 W. Adams Street

Chicago, Illinois 60606




Dear Richard:




     Reference is hereby made to the Stock Purchase Agreement, made and entered into as of November
18, 2008 (the “Agreement”), by and among Lime Energy Co. (“Lime”), Richard P. Kiphart individually
and as Sellers’ Representative and certain other stockholders of Advanced Biotherapy, Inc. listed
in Schedule A to the Agreement. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the
respective meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.



     This letter (the “Extension”) confirms our agreement that the date for the performance of
Lime’s obligation to prepare and file a Registration Statement, pursuant to Section 6.15 of the
Agreement, shall be extended to January 16, 2009.



     Except as specifically modified by this Extension, all other terms and provisions of the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.



     Please indicate your agreement by countersigning this letter, in your capacity as Sellers’
Representative pursuant to Section 8.4(b) of the Agreement, in the space below and returning an
executed copy via facsimile to Reed Smith, LLP, Attention: Jacob Thride, (312) 207-6400.



Sincerely,




/s/ Jeffrey R. Mistarz




Jeffrey R. Mistarz

Chief Financial Officer

Lime Energy Co.




ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008




	 	 	 
	/s/ Richard P. Kiphart
 

Richard P. Kiphart

	 	 
	In his capacity as Sellers’ Representative
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,008
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2,360
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 656
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  274,127
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       271,517
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,610
<LOANS>                                    1,427,457
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               621,516
<DEPOSITS>                                   397,477
<SHORT-TERM>                                 169,187
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           14,449
<LONG-TERM>                                   16,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          20
<OTHER-SE>                                    23,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               621,516
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6,080
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5,772
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  19
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              11,871
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5,635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,399
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,837
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               171
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (282)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (282)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                       (220)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (62)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  1.91
<LOANS-NON>                                    8,949
<LOANS-PAST>                                   5,595
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 437
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               11,053
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,653
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    139
<RECOVERIES>                                     110
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,623
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,623
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,932
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                                  to 
                         Certificate Holders

                                                  Ending
Class    Interest        Principal       Losses   Balance
<S>     <C>              <C>             <C>      <C> 
A       32,437,967.77     9,473,421.52      0.00   132,135,032.23
B1           3,308.71       158,804.58      0.00     2,568,691.29
B2           1,653.07        79,340.53      0.00     1,283,346.93
B3           1,102.48        52,914.27      0.00       855,897.52
B4           1,434.37        68,844.13      0.00     1,113,565.63
B5             661.22        31,736.21      0.00       513,338.78
B6             662.25        31,785.72      0.00       514,139.44
R                0.00             6.16      0.00           100.00





</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROY R. MOSES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 226 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7354 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7354

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit certain unfair credit 
                   practices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2018

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Schneider, and Mr. Jones 
of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit certain unfair credit 
                   practices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Lending Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 
1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 140B. Unfair credit practices
    ``(a) In General.--In connection with the extension of credit in or 
affecting commerce, as defined in section 4 of the Federal Trade 
Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 44), no creditor may directly or indirectly 
take or receive from a borrower an obligation that constitutes or 
contains a cognovit or confession of judgment (for purposes other than 
executory process in the State of Louisiana), warrant of attorney, or 
other waiver of the right to notice and the opportunity to be heard in 
the event of suit or process thereon.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--Section 135 of the Truth 
in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1645) is amended by striking ``and 134'' and 
inserting ``134, and 140B''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  413,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    133,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               975,061
<PP&E>                                       1,472,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,341,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,797,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,065
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,958,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,341,064
<SALES>                                        115,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,275
<CGS>                                          ,67,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (517,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (517,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (517,021)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20042

YOLANDA M AGUIRRE; ANA M MORRIS; CORINA RAMOS; ROSE URDIALEZ; OLGA ZERTUCHE; ALEJANDRA S AMIE; NARA DELEON; SYLVIA DIAHNN SANCHEZ Plaintiffs-Appellants v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC; SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO; SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-cv-03198
Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The issue in this appeal is whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. (“SWB”) after concluding that Plaintiffs-Appellants Yolanda Aguirre, Ana Morris, Corina Ramos, Rose Urdialez, Olga Zertuche, Alejandra S. Amie, Nara Deleon, and Sylvia Diahnn Sanchez (“Sanchez”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) were United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 6, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-20042

2 exempt from the overti me provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201–219, because they were “executives” under 29C.F.R. § 541.100(a). Plaintiffs also appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to reconsider. Finally, Plaintiffs assert that the di strict court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of SWB on Plaintiff Sanchez’s retaliation claim. We affirm thejudgment of the district court for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough memorandum and order dated September 30, 2007, granting SWB’s motion for summary judgment, and its memorandum and opinion dated December 20, 2007, denying Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 811 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 811

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat obligations 
  financing professional sports stadiums as private activity bonds if 
          such obligations meet the private business use test.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

 Mr. Russell (for himself, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat obligations 
  financing professional sports stadiums as private activity bonds if 
          such obligations meet the private business use test.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS FINANCING PROFESSIONAL SPORTS 
              STADIUMS AS PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 141(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Special rule for professional sports stadiums.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any issue any 
                proceeds of which are to be used to provide a 
                professional sports stadium, such issue shall be 
                treated as meeting the private security or payment test 
                of subsection (b)(2).
                    ``(B) Professional sports stadium.--For purposes of 
                this paragraph, the term `professional sports stadium' 
                means any facility (and appurtenant real property) 
                which, during at least 5 days during any calendar year, 
                is used as a stadium or arena for professional sports 
                exhibitions, games, or training.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to obligations issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marion E. WATTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-6482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Marion E. Watts, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, WILLARD G. ROUSE, III, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



/s/ WILLARD G. ROUSE, III
-----------------------------------
Willard G. Rouse, III
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 102
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                            12
<INVENTORY>                                            687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,547
<PP&E>                                                 478
<DEPRECIATION>                                         305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   21
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,321
<SALES>                                              3,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,249
<CGS>                                                2,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (318)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (69)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (69)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)


</TABLE>
FILED

January 31, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

THURSTON ANDREW HELMS, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Davidson Chancery

) No. 92-3515-I

VS. )

) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9505-CH-00194

MICHAEL C. GREENE, )

COMMISSIONER, TENNESSEE )

DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, )

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

PARTIAL DISSENTING OPINION

I concur in the result reached in this case, but continue to be troubled

by the question of the appellant’s right to a jury trial. Since my two colleagues

participated in the case of Jones v. Greene, App. No. 01-A-01-9505-CH-00187 (Tenn.

App. Dec. 4, 1996), which decided this issue contrary to the appellant’s position, I will

not press the issue here. But, I decline to join Part III of the majority opinion.

_______________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
EXHIBIT
32.1





HERITAGE
OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
report on Form 10Q


for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  May
      5, 2010
              /s/ Lawrence P. WardLawrence
      P. WardPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal Executive
  Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.