alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES *v.*KIZER, DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, et al.

No. 86-863.

Argued November 10, 1987

Decided March 23, 1988

*Deputy Solicitor General Merrill*argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were *Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deputy Solicitor General Lauber, Jerrold J. Ganzfried,*and *Richard Olderman.*

*Ralph Johnson,*Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were *John K. Van de Kamp,*Attorney General, and *Evelyn R. Frank.*
      ***

Briefs of *amici curiae*urging affirmance were filed for the State of Maryland et al. by *Lacy H. Thornburg,*Attorney General of North Carolina, and *Henry T. Rosser,*Assistant Attorney General, joined by the Attorneys General for their respective States as follows: *W. J. Michael Cody*of Tennessee, *Nicholas J. Spaeth of*North Dakota, *Jeffrey L. Amestoy*of Vermont, *Hubert H. Humphrey III*of Minnesota, *J. Joseph Curran, Jr.,*of Maryland, *Robert M. Spire*of Nebraska, and *Ken Eikenberry*of Washington; and for the California Association of Public Hospitals et al. by *Mark S. Windisch.*

Per Curiam.

We granted the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ petition for certiorari, 479 U. S. 1083 (1987), in order to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir*387cuit that the Secretary unlawfully rejected a California Medicaid plan amendment because an internal agency manual stating approval of the type of provision in question was a binding regulation, and because acceptance of the amendment was required by § 2373(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 1112, note following 42 U. S. C. § 1396a (1982 ed., Supp. III). *Cubanski*v. *Heckler,*781 F. 2d 1421 (1986). After the case had been briefed and argued, Congress enacted § 4106 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330, which required the Secretary to approve the proposed California amendment, retroactively to the date of its proposal. The Secretary has complied with that requirement.

The parties agree that these developments have rendered the controversy moot. In accordance with our established practice, we vacate the judgment of the Ninth Circuit and remand with instructions to dismiss the suit. See *Deakins*v. *Monaghan,*484 U. S. 193, 200, 204 (1988); *United States*v. *Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U. S. 36, 39-40 (1950).

*It is so ordered.*

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report Fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: August 8, 2007 |        | By:* */s/ Michael      Forster            |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Michael Forster                                                                                       |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer                                                     |
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus                          |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | June 9, 2005                           |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard containedtherein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan
B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By /s/ Alan B. Levan  Name: Alan B. Levan
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 24, 2004
584 A.2d 249

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD JEFFERSON.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Leake v. Highland Mutual Insurance Co.

*Marie Spina Altobelli,*for plaintiff.

*John Straka III,*for defendant.

April 16, 1992

WAGNER, *J.,*

This matter is before the court on preliminary objections filed by the defendant, Highland Mutual Insurance Co., alleging that section 1797 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law precludes the plaintiff’s claim as the plaintiff did not challenge the results of a peer review within 30 days of the date of that action. Instead of challenging the peer review, the plaintiff filed a civil complaint to recover first-party benefits from his automobile insurance carrier, the defendant herein.

The issue raised by the preliminary objections is whether section 1797 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (75 Pa.C.S. §1797) re*672quires the challenger of a peer review determination to request reconsideration of that determination by the peer review agency prior to the judicial process.

The defendant would have us follow the decision of Judge William J. Martin in *Sullinger*v. *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 807*C.D. *1991,*(Indiana County), wherein the court held that an insured is precluded from instituting direct court action once the insurer has begun the peer review process regardless of whether or not a reconsideration of the peer review was requested. We decline to do so.

Instead, we are persuaded that the decision of Judge Stanton R. Wettick of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in *Lehman*v. *State Farm,*140 Pitts. Leg. J. 78 (1990), should be adopted and followed. Judge Wettick held that failure to request reconsideration of a peer review determination did not bar the insured from commencing suit for medical benefits under the provisions of an existing automobile insurance policy. Like Judge Wettick, we agree that the 1990 amendments to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law did not change or alter the original provisions of the 1984 law so as to remove the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas over claims to enforce benefits of automobile insurance policies covering payments of medical benefits, even where those claims had been submitted to a peer review agency.

In accordance with the foregoing, we hereby make the following

ORDER

And now, April 16,1992, the preliminary objections of the defendant are hereby dismissed and denied.
##### 



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By/s/James A. White
Name: James A. White
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 21, 2003

The foregoing certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Companys previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the
Companys future filings, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, in
whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into
any such filings.

46
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00012

- CR

Lonnie Charles Williams, III

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 1

o f Denton County (CR

- 2016

- 07798

- C )

Ja nuary 25, 2018

Opinion by Justice Bleil

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECO ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Charles Bleil

____________________ Justice Charles Bleil
Exhibit 10.35


 


Healthnet
Assessments Inc.


119
Westcreek Drive, Suite 4


Woodbridge,
Ontario L4L 9N6


 


November
2, 2021


 


James
Asher, President


Novo
Healthnet Limited


3905
Major Mackenzie Drive, Suite 115


Woodbridge,
Ontario L4H 4R2


 


	SUBJ:	CAD$2,000,000
    Series ‘“A” Debenture, dated September 30, 2013, Extension of Term Due Date to December 1, 2023


 


Dear
Mr. Asher,


 


We
want to thank you for your communication of September 28, 2021 in which your company, Novo Healthnet Limited, requested an extension
of full and final payment with respects to the Series “A” Debenture, dated September 30, 2013 (the “Debenture”),
with an original principal amount of CAD$2,000,000 and an original term due date of September 30, 2016.


 


On
December 2, 2017, the parties agreed to extend the term due date, for payment of the Debentures’ principal and interest owed, to
September 30, 2019. On January 31, 2018, the parties agreed to convert 75% of the Debenture amount owed, both principal and interest,
into shares of common stock (par value $0.001) of Novo Healthnet Limited’s parent company, Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, in lieu of accepting a cash payment for 75% of the amount owed, both principal and interest. On September 27, 2019, the
parties agreed to extend the term due date, for payment of the Debentures’ principal and interest owed, to September 30, 2021.


 


Effective
November 2, 2021, Healthnet Assessments Inc. agrees to extend the term due date for payment of the Debentures’ principal and interest
owed, to December 1, 2023, with no penalties incurred and with all terms and conditions, as defined in the Debenture, remaining in full
force and effect.


 


	APPROVED	 	 
	 	 	 
	Debenture
    Holder	 	Debenture
    Issuer
	Healthnet
    Assessments Inc.	 	Novo
    Healthnet Limited
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Robert Mattacchione	 	/s/
    James Asher
	Robert
    Mattacchione	 	James
    Asher
	Authorized
Signing Officer
	 	Authorized
    Signing Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRETT H. HEDDEN.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE CLINTON ETHERIDGE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-90-48, CA-97-173-2) Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Clinton Etheridge, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Etheridge , Nos. CR-90-48, CA-97-173-2 (E.D. Va. June 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 22, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia**                     (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:                

*1. Evelyn Rome Tabas*, Narberth, Pennsylvania; to acquire voting shares of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. Narberth, Pennsylvania, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Royal Asian Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Royal Bank of America, Narberth, Pennsylvania.                

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. The Galen L. Curry Marital Trust and Donna M. Curry*, Piqua, Kansas, trustee, to retain control of My Anns Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain control of Piqua State Bank, both in Piqua, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-2564 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133636 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133636 COA: 276465 Ottawa CC: 03-027735-FH TEDDY LAWRENCE TURIC, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OMAR BEASLEY.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit32.1

 

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the annualReport of Bemax Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taiwo Aimasiko, Chief Executive Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 19, 2017

/s/ Taiwo Aimasiko

____________________________

Taiwo Aimasiko

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board: Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board's Committee on Programs and Plans, 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the 
scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board 
business and other matters specified, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: October 13, 2010, 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.

SUBJECT MATTER: Review of NSB Action Item (NSB/CPP-10-63) (Deep 
Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL)) and an update 
on University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign High Performance Computing 
Award.

STATUS: Closed.

LOCATION: This meeting will be held at National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.

UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: Please refer to the National Science 
Board Web site http://www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and 
schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may 
be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this 
meeting is: Elizabeth Strickland, National Science Board Office, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Daniel A. Lauretano,
Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-25312 Filed 10-4-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
585 A.2d 393

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS AS TO VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BY CARMINE FRANCO AND COMPANY, INC., AND CARMINE FRANCO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF CARMINE FRANCO AND COMPANY, INC.

October 10, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10946

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

ALVARO GUEVARA-NINO,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-626-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alvaro Guevara-Nino has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Guevara-Nino has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 11, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10946 Document: 00515112956 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2019
No. 18-10946

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-10946 Document: 00515112956 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2019