alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-8.htm


    Exhibit
10.8

    


    TWENTIETH
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    This
Twentieth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
October 1, 2008, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(“Employer”) and Robert M. Gans (“Executive”).

    


    Recitals

    


    
      	
              A)  

            	
              On
      September 20, 1994 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by
      and between Executive and Price Enterprises,
  Inc.

            


    

    


    
      	
              B)  

            	
              Said
      Employment Agreement has been assigned to Employer and amended on nineteen
      prior occasions;

            


    

    


    
      	
              C)  

            	
              Employer
      and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set
      forth hereinbelow:

            


    

    


    Agreement

    


    1.    Section
3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which currently provides:

    


    3.1           Term.  The
term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 17, 1994 and
shall continue until October 16, 2008 unless sooner terminated or extended as
hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

    


    is hereby
amended, to provide as follows:

    


    3.1           Term.  The
term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 17, 1994 and
shall continue until October 16, 2009 unless sooner terminated or extended as
hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

    


    
      	
              2.  

            	
              All
      other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain
      unaltered and fully effective.

            


    

    


    


    


    Executed
in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

    


    


    EXECUTIVE                                                                                     EMPLOYER

    PRICESMART, INC.

    


    Robert M.
Gans                                                                                     By:           

    


    ______________________                                                              Name:                      Jose Luis
Laparte

    


    Its:           President
**BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.**
Exhibit 31.2
I, Alan B. Levan, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004   By: /s/Alan B. Levan  Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer
584 A.2d 233

#### ROBERT MARAS v. LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 861 

To terminate the Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. PALAZZO, and Mr. LOUDERMILK) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, 

Transportation and Infrastructure, and Science, Space, and Technology, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To terminate the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRO4 TECTION AGENCY. 

5 The Environmental Protection Agency shall termi6 nate on December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
584 A.2d 250

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT SHAVE.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

*Date and Time:*                         The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on October 14, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A. Approval of Minutes

    - September 8, 2010.

### B. New Business

    - Policy Statement on Cooperative Operating Philosophy—Serving the Members of the Farm Credit System Institutions.
    - Board Resolution on Cooperative Operating Philosophy.
    - Joint and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement—Notice of Approval.
    - Merger of Farm Credit of North Florida, and Farm Credit of Southwest Florida, ACAs, and their subsidiaries with and into Farm Credit of South Florida, ACA, and its subsidiaries.

### C. Reports

    - OE Quarterly Report on the Farm Credit System.

## Closed Session*

### Reports

Report on Institutions' Supervisory, Enforcement, and
    - Oversight Activities.

*Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).

Dated: October 7, 2010.

Roland E. Smith,

*Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.*

[FR Doc. 2010-25765 Filed 10-7-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
585 A.2d 385

#### THE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. JASPER J. JACKSON.

October 2, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 347

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HECTOR MALDONADO.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Operating Advisor,
Citibank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2014-GC23 (CGCMT
2014-GC23)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein
certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  | Date: March 1, 2018
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |
585 A.2d 402

#### ROSE SATZ v. H.T. HALL, INC.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Malcolm McDonald v. Charles L. Ortman.

*Question for jmp*— Commissions *on sale of real estate.*

1. Where plaintiff’s testimony makes a *prima facie*case, and is contradicted in material parts by that of the defendant, the case should be submitted to the jury!

■2. Testimony tending to show that the plaintiff made a special agreement with the defendant that he should be paid a commission of two and one-half per cent, on whatever price ceri tain real estate was sold for, if he was instrumental in bringing about the sale, and that he was instrumental in bringing about a sale for §45,000, and also what his services were worth in estimating the pine upon the land preparatory to a sale thereof, and that the defendant requested him to proceed and find a purchaser from time to time, which he did, if uncontradicted, entitles the plaintiff to recover.

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.)

Argued October 28, 1891.

Decided December 21, 1891.

*Assumpsit.*Plaintiff brings error.

Eeversed.

The factB .are stated in the opinion.

*James H. Pound,*for appellant.

*DeForest Paine,*for defendant.

*646Ohamplin, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this suit to *recover*commissions which he claims are owing to him by defendant for his efforts in selling eertain pine lairds belonging to defendant. The declaration also contains the common counts in *assumpsit.*

Upon the trial he gave testimony tending to show that he made a special agreement with the defendant that he should be paid *2i¡*per cent, commission on whatever price the land was sold for, if he was instrumental in bringing about the sale. He also introduced testimony tending to show that he was instrumental in bringing about a sale for $45,000. He also showed what his services were worth in estimating the pine upon the land preparatory to a sale thereof, and he introduced testimony .tending to show that the defendant requested him to proceed and find a purchaser from time to time, which he did. There is no doubt that, if there had been no-testimony introduced on the part of the defendant, plaintiff would have been entitled to recover.

The defendant and the purchaser testified on behalf of defendant directly contrary to plaintiff's testimony in material parts, whereupon the court directed a verdict for the defendant.

In this we think the court erred. The plaintiff had made at least a *prima facie*case, and, although the testimony of the defendant tended to contradict it, the case was one that should have been submitted to the jury.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.
585 A.2d 396

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM HUTCHINS.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 8.1

Ascendis Pharma A/S

Subsidiaries
of the Registrant



|                                                   |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Ascendis Pharma GmbH                               |  | Germany                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Inc.                              |  | Delaware, USA                
|Ascendis Pharma, Endocrinology Division A/S        |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Ophthalmology Division A/S        |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Osteoarthritis Division A/S       |  | Denmark                      
|Ascendis Pharma, Circulatory Diseases Division A/S |  | Denmark
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0630

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ROBERT LONG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and good

cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including January 29, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2020

12/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0630
|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report Fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: May 9, 2007 | By: /s/ Michael Forster            |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Michael Forster                                                                           |
|               | Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer                                         |
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 8, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

A. C. ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-5045

(D.C. No. 4:07-CR-00023-TCK-1)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before LUCERO, EBEL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appellate waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. Through counsel,

defendant filed a response in which he agreed that his appeal fell within the scope

of the waiver in his plea agreement, that his waiver was knowing and voluntary,

and that none of the conditions that would make the waiver unenforceable existed.
-2-

Because defendant does not contest the government’s motion to enforce the plea

agreement, the motion is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7943

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. JOHNNIE ELVIN MCKELVEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:02-cr-00516-DCN-1; 2:09-cv-70080-DCN)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Elvin McKelvey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Elvin McKelvey seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKelvey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jill Granoff, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JILL GRANOFF



Jill Granoff
Chief Executive Officer
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc 
May 7, 2010

















---
584 A.2d 251

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN MANDICH.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Josie Stokes WEATHERLY v. FONSECA & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.

No. 2010-C-2497.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Weatherly, Josie Stokes; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Coui't Div. L, No. 2008-6778; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-495.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Alan B.
Levan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan B. Levan
-------------------------------------
Name: Alan B. Levan
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:



The foregoing certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the
Company's future filings, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in whole
or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any
such filings.