Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 13, 2010 / Notices 62765 

1The bracketed section of the product 

description, [3,2–b:3′,2′-m], is not businessproprietary information. In this case, the brackets 

are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. 

The effective date of continuation of 

these orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five-year review of these orders not later 

than 30 days prior to the fifth 

anniversary of the effective date of 

continuation. These five-year (sunset) 

reviews and this notice are in 

accordance with sections 751(c) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: October 6, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25776 Filed 10–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–806] 

Silicon Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China; Extension of Time 

Limit for the Final Results of the 2008– 

2009 Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Demitri Kalogeropoulos, or Keith 

Huffman, AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–2623 and (202) 

482–4987, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 29, 2009, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated the 

administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the 

antidumping duty order on silicon 

metal from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period June 1, 

2008, through May 31, 2009. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 37690 (July 29, 2009). On 

July 15, 2010, the Department published 

its preliminary results. See Silicon 

Metal From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results and 

Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 41143 (July 15, 2010). 

The final results of this AR are currently 

due no later than November 12, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

final results in an AR within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time period to 

a maximum of 180 days. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

review within the original time limit 

because the Department requires 

additional time to analyze significant 

issues raised in the case briefs and 

rebuttal briefs. These issues include the 

calculation of surrogate financial ratios, 

the valuation of silica fume and coal, 

and questions regarding comparisons 

between U.S. prices and normal value. 

Therefore, given the complexity of 

issues in this case, we are extending the 

time limit for completion of the final 

results by 60 days. 

An extension of 60 days from the 

current deadline of November 12, 2010, 

would result in a new deadline of 

January 11, 2011. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: October 5, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25772 Filed 10–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–838] 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From 

India: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed-Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has determined, 

pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), that 

Meghmani Pigments is the successor-ininterest to Alpanil Industries. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jerrold Freeman or Richard Rimlinger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

(202) 482–0180 or (202) 482–4477, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 30, 2010, and in 

accordance with section 751(b) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3), we preliminarily found 

that Meghmani Pigments is the 

successor-in-interest to Alpanil 

Industries. See Carbazole Violet 

Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty ChangedCircumstances Review, 75 FR 52930 

(August 30, 2010). Although we gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the preliminary results, we 

received no comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is carbazole violet pigment 23 identified 

as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical 

Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the 

chemical name of diindolo [3,2–b:3′,2′- 

m] 1 triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 

15-diethyl-5, 15-dihydro-, and 

molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry 

powder, paste, wet cake) and finished 

pigment in the form of presscake and 

dry color. Pigment dispersions in any 

form (e.g., pigment dispersed in 

oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) 

are not included within the scope of the 

order. The merchandise subject to the 

order is classifiable under subheading 

3204.17.90.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the 

preliminary results, we continue to find 

that Meghmani Pigments is the 

successor-in-interest to Alpanil 

Industries and, as a result, should be 

accorded the same antidumping duty 

treatment as Alpanil Industries. 

Accordingly, effective on the date of 

publication of these final results in the 

Federal Register, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to 

collect cash deposits for estimated 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES