alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 13,741.

#### Liggett et al. *v.*Hinkley.

New Tbial. — As *of Right.*— Action *to Set Aside Conveyance of Real Estate. —Judgment Lien.*— “Where a creditor seeks to set aside a conveyance of real estate in order to subject it to a prior judgment lien, asserting that his debtor is the real owner, the title to the land having been fraudulently taken in the name of another, the debtor is not as of right entitled to a new trial, the title to the land being involved only collaterally.

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

*S. Keith, J. D. McLaren*and *JE. G. Martindale,*for appellants.

AL. *C. Gapron*and *M. R. Smith,*for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

This was an action by Mary Hinkley against Jane Liggett and James W. Liggett to set aside a ■conveyance of certain real estate, and to subject the land to the lien of a judgment theretofore recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant Jane Liggett.

It is averred in the complaint that Jane Liggett paid the purchase-price of the land out of her own means, and that she caused the conveyance to be taken in the name of her son, James *W.,*who paid no part of the consideration, and that this was done with the fraudulent intent, participated in by both the vendor and vendee, to cheat, hinder, and delay the creditors of Jane Liggett, and particularly to put the property beyond the reach of the plaintiff’s judgment.

There was a judgment for the plaintiff upon an issue made by the general denial, and a decree subjecting the land to the plaintiff’s judgment.

The only question involved in this appeal is the propriety of the ruling of the court in refusing the defendants a new trial as a matter of right, they having made due application therefor in the manner prescribed by the statute. '

*388Filed Oct. 19, 1889.

The plaintiff asserted no claim of title or right to the possession of the land. The action was by a creditor, who. asserted that his debtor was the real owner, and that the title to the land had been fraudulently taken in the name of another, who held it in trust for the creditors of one of the defendants. In such an action the losing party is not entitled to a new trial as a matter of right, because the title only comes in question collaterally and as a mere incident. *Perry*v. *Ensley,*10 Ind. 378; *Shular*v. *Shular,*56 Ind. 30, and cases cited.

It is only where the plaintiff claims a subsisting interest in land, and a right to the possession, or a right to have the title quieted as against another claiming an adverse title, that the statute regulating new trials as a matter of right applies. *Benner*v. *Benner,*10 Ind. 256; *Gullett*v. *Miller,*106 Ind. 75; *Kreitline*v. *Franz,*106 Ind. 359.

Where the purpose of the action is merely to enforce or cancel a lien, encumbrance, or contract, the statute does not apply. *Williams*v. *Thames, etc., Co.,*105 Ind. 420; Voss v. *Eller,*109 Ind. 260.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
584 A.2d 246

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BARRY E. PHILLIPS.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  M URRAY W ITCHER ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. No. 01-2111



#  J OSEPH W. W ESTPHAL , Secretary, United States Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00-2676-AMD) Submitted: June 27, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELSolaman G. Lippman, Richard H. Semsker, Shannon M. Salb, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United StatesAttorney, Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION PER CURIAM: Murray Witcher appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and denying his motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and for reconsideration. Witcher asserts the district court erred in dismissing his complaint for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Although Witcher’s amended complaint did not comply with thedistrict court’s instruction to allege his claims in one-sentence paragraphs, nor was the complaint a model of clarity, it was adequate toinform the Defendant of the nature of Witcher’s claims and the factual basis for those claims. Such is all that is required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A. , ___ U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 922, 998 (2002). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s dismissal order and remand for further proceedings.* We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED *We express no opinion about the merits of Witcher’s claims. 2 W ITCHER v. W ESTPHAL
585 A.2d 378

#### DOROTHY AND NORBERT BADOR v. CARL RAYFORD, M.D.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.

In Banc,

July 3, 1903.

Quo Warranto.

Writs quashed.

*Edward G. Grow,*Attorney-General, for informant; *Frank Hagerman*and *Adiel Sherwood*of counsel.

*M. A. Low, W. F. Evans*and *Frank P. Sebree*for Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company respondent; O. *M. Spencer*and *Warner, Dean, McLeod S Holden*for Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company respondent; *Martin L. Glardy*for Missouri Pacific Railway Company respondent.

BURGESS, J.

These are all companion cases to the ease of the State of Missouri *ex informatione*Edward C. Crow, Atty.-Genl. v. The Atchison, Topeka *&*Santa Fe Railway Company, decided at the present term and reported at page 687 of this volume, and for reasons given in the opinion handed down in that case the pleas to the informations are sustained, and in-formations quashed.

All concur.
585 A.2d 406

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEVIN SILVERA.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit
        23.1**
 
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 
 
 Silverleaf
        Resorts, Inc
 Dallas,
        Texas
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form
        S-8 (Nos. 333-83771 and 333-118474) of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. of our reports
        dated March 3, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
        appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 BDO
        Seidman, LLP
 Dallas,
        Texas
 March
        20,
        2006
 
 
 F-28
Exhibit 10.13


 


Page:             1


 


Purchase Order


 


	Phoenix Cars LLC	P.O. Number: 2100860     
	401 S. Doubleday Ave	Order
    Date: 10/19/2021
	Ontario CA 91761	 
	(909) 987-0815	 
	 	Vendor Number: TM4INC   


 


	Vendor:	Ship To:
	 	 
	TM4 Inc.	Phoenix Motorcars
	135 J.-A.-Bombardier	1500 Lakeview Loop
	suite 25	Anaheim, CA 92807
	J4B 8P1	
	Boucherville, Québec,	 
	Confirm To:	 





 


	Required Date
 10/19/2021
	 	Ship VIA	 	F.O.B.	 	 	Terms Net 30	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Item Code	 	Unit	 	Ordered	 	 	Received	 	 	Backordered	 	 	Unit Cost	 	 	Amount	 
	INV-HP2MV-0206-06	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	4,875.0000	 	 	 	146,250.00	 
	MOTOR CONTROL UNIT, DRIVE, 2HP 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	MO-340_240-19	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	10,938.0000	 	 	 	328,140.00	 
	MOTOR ASSY - IOTA EV MP 450V A 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	KIT-0141	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	8.0000	 	 	 	240.00	 
	PHASE CABLE BOLTS 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	KIT-0108	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	60.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	53.0000	 	 	 	3,180.00	 
	KIT CABLE END 47MM M8 AWG 1/0 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	KIT-0094	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	55.0000	 	 	 	1,650.00	 
	CO200 PHASE CABLES AWG 1/0 HAR 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	KIT-0055	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	8.0000	 	 	 	240.00	 
	DC CABLE BOLTS 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	KIT-0123	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	PACK	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	37.0000	 	 	 	1,110.00	 
	M8 DC CABLES AWG 1/0 HARDWARE 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WH-0665-L1000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	133.0000	 	 	 	3,990.00	 
	MOTOR SENSOR CABLE, I/F AMPHEN 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	3315-0253	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Whse: 100	 	EACH	 	 	30.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	0.0000	 	 	 	158.0000	 	 	 	4,740.00	 
	Flange	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 







 


	 	Net Order:	 	489,540.00	 
	 	Sales Tax:	 	0.00	 
	 	Freight:	 	0.00 	 
	 	Order Total:	 	489,540.00
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PHOTOELECTRON'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                      18,490,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    223,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,368,896
<PP&E>                                       2,344,164
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,031,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,681,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          798,486
<BONDS>                                      1,613,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,632
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,201,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,681,960
<SALES>                                        362,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,849
<CGS>                                          182,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               717,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,081,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,081,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,081,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 863 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 863

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To facilitate the addition of park administration at the Coltsville 
           National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO COLTSVILLE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK DONATION 
              SITE.

    Section 3032(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 113-291 (16 U.S.C. 410qqq) is 
amended by striking ``East Armory'' and inserting ``Colt Armory 
Complex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 863

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To facilitate the addition of park administration at the Coltsville 
           National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
```
584 A.2d 235

#### AILEEN HWANG v. ALBERTON HALL ASSOCIATION, INC.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE COU RT OF A PPEA LS OF TENN ESSEE

WESTERN SECT ION A T JA CKSON

CITY STAT E BANK )

and THE BA NK OF SHA RON ) ) Plaintiffs/App ellants, ) Shelby Circuit No. 51213-6 T.D. )

VS. ) A ppeal No. 02A 01-9504-CV-000 73 )

DEA N WITTER R EYNOLDS, INC., ) a Delaware Corporation, and )

HANK F RANCK, ) ) Defendants/Ap pellees. )

OR DE R O N P ET IT IO N T O R EH EAR

Defendants have f iled a petition to rehear which, after du e consideration, is

respectfully

denied.

This 25th day of Nov ember, 1996.

HIGHERS, J.

CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.

SUMMERS, S. J.
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement  on Form  S-3  (No.  333-85435)  and  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-56961  and
333-70137)  of Brigham  Exploration  Company of our report  dated March 7, 2000,
which  appears  on  page  F1-2  of  this  Form  10-K.  We  also  consent  to the
incorporation  by reference of our report dated March 7, 2000,  on the financial
statements of Brigham Oil & Gas L.P.;  Brigham Holdings I, LLC; Brigham Holdings
II, LLC and Brigham, Inc., which appears on page F2-1 of this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 24, 2000
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Philippe Deschamps, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K of Helius Medical Technologies, Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 30, 2018                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                   |
| /s/ Philippe Deschamps                                                                                 |
| Philippe Deschamps                                                                                     |
| Chief Executive Officer

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on October 13, 2010 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt an interim final temporary rule under Section 766 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, to provide for the reporting of certain security-based swap transactions and including an interpretive note regarding retention and recordkeeping requirements for certain security-based swap transactions.

2. The Commission will consider whether to propose Regulation MC pursuant to Section 765 of the Dodd-Frank Act to mitigate conflicts of interest at security-based swap clearing agencies, security-based swap execution facilities, and national security exchanges that post or make available for trading security-based swaps.

3. The Commission will consider whether to propose rules that would implement Section 945 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which requires an issuer of asset-backed securities (ABS) to perform a review of the assets underlying the ABS and disclose information relating to the review. The Commission will also consider whether to propose rules that would implement Section 15E(s)(4)(A) of the Exchange Act as added by Section 932 of the Act, which requires an ABS issuer or underwriter to make publicly available the findings and conclusions of any third-party due diligence report.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

      ( print page 62614)    
Dated: October 6, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-25677 Filed 10-7-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
MEMORANDUM


TO:       Roxanne M. Hellickson, 
          Vice President/Corporate Secretary

FROM:     Home Federal Savings Bank

DATE:     July 29, 1998

RE:       Notice of Extension of Employment Contract

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors (the Board) of Home Federal Savings Bank
has reviewed your formal performance evaluation performed by
selected members of the Board. In connection therewith and
pursuant to Section 1 of your contract, on May 19, 1998, the
Board determined to extend your employment contract until the May
Board Meeting, 2001.

                              HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK     

                         By:  /s/ M.F. Schumann
                              ---------------------------
                              M.F. Schumann


                     EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     I hereby acknowledge receipt of this notice of extension of
the above-referenced agreement and accept the extension of the
term of such agreement.

                              EMPLOYEE  

Dated:      7-29-98           By: /s/ James B. Gardner
      ---------------------       ------------------------
     (Correction from 5-19-98)     James B. Gardner
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, G. Christopher Colville, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial andAccounting Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                               Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:   February2, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ G. Christopher Colville               |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | G. Christopher Colville                   |
|   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | and Accounting Officer and Secretary      |

 

----
584 A.2d 202

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRIAN JACKSON.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ibikunle Sunday FAYEMI, a/k/a Ayodele Adebayo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7168.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.

Decided Jan. 17, 2001.

Ibikunle Sunday Fayemi, pro se. Kenneth Davis Bell, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appel-lee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Ibikunle Sunday Fayemi appeals a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Fayemi,*Nos. CR-94-168; CA-99-343-3-2V (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2000).* We dispense *252with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on July 6, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 14, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. *See Wilson v. Murray,*806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.1986).
585 A.2d 354

#### NANCY MacCLUGGAGE WHITE v. CYNTHIA HOWARD AND AGENCY RENT-A-CAR, INC. AND CYNTHIA HOWARD AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY AND AGENCY RENT-A-CAR.

July 17, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*427, 573 A.2d 513)