alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LOWER MAIN STREET ASSOCIATES v. NEW JERSEY HOUSING AND MORTGAGE FINANCE AGENCY.

October 13, 1987.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 219 *N.J.Super.*263).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia State 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS 
State Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide 
specifically in the following practice standards: <greek-i>314, Brush 
Management, <greek-i>324, Deep Tillage, <greek-i>330, Contour Farming, 
<greek-i>332, Contour Buffer Strips, <greek-i>344, Residue Management, 
Seasonal, <greek-i>346, Residue Management, Ridge Till, <greek-i>380, 
Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment, <greek-i>484, Mulching, 
<greek-i>512, Forage & Biomass Planting, and <greek-i>603, Herbaceous 
Wind Barriers. These practices will be used to plan and install 
conservation practices.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bricker, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606 
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; Telephone 
number (804) 287-1691; Fax number (804) 287-1737. Copies of the 
practice standards will be made available upon written request to the 
address shown above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site: http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/draftstandards.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: October 4, 2010.
W. Ray Dorsett,
Acting State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2010-25663 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
# **Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, JeffPotter, certify that:

 

1.                                       I havereviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Frontier Airlines, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

Date                       November 10,2005

 

 
|   | By:    |    /s/  Jeff S. Potter                    |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |    Jeff  S. Potter                        |
|   |   |    President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            PHOTOELECTRON CORPORATION

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photoelectron Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
W. Baker, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 29, 2002 and
    results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended
    June 29, 2002.

                                                 /s/ Timothy W. Baker
                                                 --------------------

                                                 Timothy W. Baker, President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                                 August 19, 2002
585 A.2d 360

#### CAROL ANN FELDMAN v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.

July 30, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 234 *N.J.Super.*559, 561 A.2d 288)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
 Accompanying
    Form 10-Q
    Report
    of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and
    (b))
  Form 10-Q
  Michael
    W. Brennan
        Michael
    J. Havala
        A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
    contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
    filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
    incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
    of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall
    be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF V.A.S. AND C.S.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.1
 BANKATLANTIC BANCORP, INC.
            1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



16




---



##### 



17




---



##### 



18




---



##### 



19
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Safari
Associates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen Steeneck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                   /s/ Stephen Steeneck
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Stephen Steeneck
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Haddon B. Libby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
      Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /S/
                HADDON
                LIBBYName:
            Haddon
                B. LibbyTitle:
            Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            February
                14, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of July, 2006.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName:

Harley E Barnes IIITitle:

Chief Financial Officer




---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Judith S. SCAGLIONE and Raymond C. Doran, Jr. v. Jeanne Nunez JUNEAU, individually and in her capacity as Candidate for the Office of Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, and Lena R. Torres, in her capacity as Clerk of Court for the Thirty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Bernard, State of Louisiana.

No. 2010-C-1734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 27, 2010.

*128PER CURIAM.*

| |Writ granted. The district court’s ruling maintaining the peremptory exception of peremption is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The lower courts erred in finding that the objecting citizens were required to name in their petition within the time limitation period both the candidate and the Secretary of State in order to state a cause of action under La. R.S. 18:1401 and 18:1402. “A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” *Ramey v. DeCaire,*03-1299 (La.3/19/04), 869 So.2d 114, 118. *See also*La. R.S. 18:1406(B)(“The petition shall set forth in specific detail the facts upon which the objection or contest is based.”).

Here, the plaintiffs timely filed their petition, and the pertinent peremptory objection for challenging their failure to name the Secretary of State, instead of the Clerk of Court for St. Bernard Parish, as the official before whom the candidate had qualified was a peremptory exception for nonjoinder of a party under La. C.C.P. art. |3⁄4641. *See*La. C.C.P. art. 927(A). Furthermore, the district court should have permitted the plaintiffs the opportunity to amend and supplement their timely-filed petition to substitute the Secretary of State for the Clerk of Court. *See*La. C.C.P. arts. 646 and 934; *see also*La. R.S. 18:1406(B)(“The trial judge may allow the filing of amended pleadings for good cause shown and in the interest of justice.”).1

Finally, the lower courts erred in relying on *Naghi v. Brener,*08-2527 (La.6/26/09), 17 So.3d 919, to find that any and all additional pleadings were perempted, because the facts of that case are distinguishable. Here, the plaintiffs initially set forth a viable claim in their original petition and the proposed addition or substitution of the Secretary of State does not involve a different or new cause of action. *See*La. C.C.P. art. 1153; *see also Ray v. Alexandria Mall,*434 So.2d 1083 (La.1983). The *129matter is remanded to the district court for further expedited proceedings not inconsistent with the ruling of this court.

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

VICTORY, J., concurs in the result.

*

 Kimball, C.J., not participating in this opinion.

1

. According to the dissenting opinions below, the representative for the Secretary of State appeared at the hearing on the exceptions, where he testified that he had received a copy of the suit via facsimile from the Clerk of Court for St. Bernard Parish within the per-emptive period and that the Secretary of State typically would have no objection to lack of formal service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      14,558,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               79,582,882
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,974,673)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,456,103
<PP&E>                                       4,485,008
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,476,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,630,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       76,467,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,607
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,127,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,630,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,713,163
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,699,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,226,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                387,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
864 A.2d 408

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARLOS M. ROSADO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued November 8, 2004

Decided January 26, 2005.

*246
      *Nancy C. Ferro*argued the cause for appellant *(Ferro & Ferro,*attorneys; *Alan I. Smith,*Designated counsel, Public Defender, on the brief).

*Carol M. Henderson,*Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent *(Peter C. Harvey,*Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

*Carlos M. Rosado*submitted a letter in lieu of brief, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

While driving under the influence of alcohol, defendant Carlos Rosado ran a red light, hit another vehicle and killed its driver, nineteen-year old Michael Albano. Defendant was charged with first-degree death by auto within 1,000 feet of school property and driving with a revoked license. Defendant pled guilty to both charges, and in exchange the prosecutor recommended a twelve-year term of imprisonment on the death-by-auto charge, a concurrent term of imprisonment of 180-days on the driving with a revoked license charge, and a one-year suspension of defendant’s driver’s license. The trial court accepted the State’s recommendations, and sentenced defendant accordingly.

The terms of the No Early Release Act, *N.J.S.A*2C:43-7.2 (NERA), apply to the death-by-auto charge. *N.J.S.A*2C:43-7.2d(3). Accordingly, defendant was subject to a minimum period of parole ineligibility of eighty-five percent of the sentence imposed and to a mandatory five-year period of parole supervision. *N.J.S.A*2C:43-7.2c. As in *State v. Johnson,*182 *N.J.*232, 864 A.2d 400, 2005 *WL*154292 (2005), decided today, defendant was not informed about the mandatory period of parole supervision required by NERA. Consistent with our holding in *Johnson,*we reverse and remand for a determination as to whether defendant’s mistaken belief regarding the penal consequences of his sentence was a material factor in his decision to plead guilty, entitling defendant to relief under *Rule*3:21-1.

*247
      *For reversal and remandment*— Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

*Opposed*— None.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM TOWNS.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0544 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LEIGH CANAL
- HUGHES,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 9 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0544
585 A.2d 405

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. R.R.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF VIEWCAST.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH
31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,335,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,597,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                   863,600
<INVENTORY>                                  2,739,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,332,346
<PP&E>                                       2,381,579
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,055,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,300,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,588,647
<BONDS>                                        950,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        104
<COMMON>                                         1,242
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,760,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,300,029
<SALES>                                      2,009,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,014,164
<CGS>                                        1,048,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,048,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               975,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                40,853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,101,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,101,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,101,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertB. Goergen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Goergen                    |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | April 14, 2005                  |

 

Thiscertification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subjectto the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
Order entered February 21, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00065 - CV JERRY, MARSHA AND JA SON CHAMBERS, Appellant s V. ALLSTATE INSURANCE C OMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kauf man County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 87353 - 422



### O RDER We GRANT appellants’ February 18, 2014 “ motion to file 5 page jurisdictional brief with statement of case” and ORDER the jurisdictional brief tendered to the Clerk on February 18, 2014 filed as of t he date of this order
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE