alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Quarterly Training Summit

October 2016

U.S. Department of Labor

U.S. 

MSHA December Stakeholder Meeting

December 6th, 2023

Brian Goepfert

Administrator for Mine Safety and Health Enforcement

Office of Mine Safety and Health Enforcement

1
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

All Mining Fatalities (CY 18-23 to date)

2

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 3

Miner, Contractor, Customer Fatality Breakdown (CY 23 to date)

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

CY 2023 Fatalities to Date by Classification

4

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

CY 2023 Fatalities to Date by Experience at the Mine

5

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

CY 2023 Fatalities to Date by Experience at the Activity

6

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

CY 2023 Fatalities to Date by Total Mining Experience

7

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Stillwater Mining Company 

Stillwater Mine

Nye, Montana

Accident Classification: 

Machinery

November 13, 2023

A rotating drill steel of a roof 

bolting machine entangled a miner, 

causing fatal injuries.

8
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Nevada Gold Mines 

Genesis

Carlin, Nevada

Accident Classification: 

Powered Haulage

September 17, 2023

A miner died when he rolled 

over the truck he was 

operating.

9
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Superior Silica Sand LLC

San Antonio Plant

Bexar, Texas

Accident Classification: 

Fall of Person

August 5, 2023

A customer truck driver was fatally 

injured when he fell from a large 

container mounted on the trailer of 

his truck. The victim climbed onto 

the container and fell while 

dismounting the container. The 

victim succumbed to his injuries on 

August 8, 2023. 

10
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

District Stakeholder Meetings

11

MONITORING ACCIDENT TRENDS 

IN THE MINING INDUSTRY

RESPONDING TO THE INCREASE 

IN FATAL ACCIDENTS

FIRST DISTRICT STAKEHOLDER 

MEETING – JANUARY 23RD, 2024
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Total Issuances (CY 18-23 to Date)

12

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Top 5 30 CFR Standards Cited at All Mines (CY 18-23 to Date)

13

*To date as of 12/04/2023
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Top 5 30 CFR Standards Related to All Imminent Danger Orders (CY 18-23 to Date)

14

*To date as of 12/04/2023
15

FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023

104(b) Orders 10 23 16 15 22 21

104(d)(1) Orders 0 1 0 0 0 0

104(d)(2) Orders 3 0 1 0 0 0

Health Orders at All Mines
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL 16

FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023

Number of Dust Samples 31,582 31,939 25,217 25,374 25,766 27,084

Mines Sampled 3,618 3,900 3,293 3,945 3,477 3,838

Enforecable Overexposures 382 359 236 232 238 274

Dust Samples at All Mines
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Enhanced Enforcement at MSHA (FY 23)

17

 Issuance Categories 

Block Against 

Motion

New Miner 

Training

Task 

Training

Traffic 

Control

Total 

Issuances

Number of Issuances 287 347 310 90 1,034

S&S % 64% 63% 53% 69% 61%

Total Unwarrantable Failures 16 2 6 3 27
MSHA.GOV | @MSHA_DOL

Total HCC’s Received by MSHA (FY 18-23)

18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 19, 2010, 8 a.m. to November 19, 2010, 6 p.m., Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC, 20015 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 30, 2010, 75 FR 60465-60466.                

The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites Washington DC, 1250 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 20030. The meeting date and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25601 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2029

WARREN B. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,

Washington, DC; THOMAS P. MARZILLE, Special

Agent, Naval Criminal Investigation Service,

Camp Lejeune, NC; JAMES DURVIN, Special Agent,

Naval Criminal Investigation Service, Camp

Lejeune, NC; B. T. BABIN, Colonel, United

States Marine Corps, NC; N. T. HARTENSTEIN,

Colonel, United States Marine Corps, NC;

WILLIAM MICHAEL BROWN, Captain, United States

Marine Corps, NC; JAMES WOODWORTH, Captain,

United States Marine Corps, NC; JAMES T.

MCCOLGAN, III, Captain, United States Marine

Corps, NC; LAUGHINGHOUSE, Colonel, Staff Judge

Advocate, United States Marine Corps, NC; J.

A. BUKAUSKAS, Major, United States Marine

Corps, NC; P. G. HOWARD, General, Covening

Authority, Marine Corps Base, North Carolina;

DALE E. ANDERSON, Major, Appellate Division,

United States Marine Corps, Washington, DC;

MARK STEVENS, Colonel, Retired United States

Marine Corps, NC; CONNIE CROCKER, Department

of Social Service, Jacksonville, NC; GEOLF

ENGELSTETTER, Dr., Clinical Psychologist,

Jacksonville, NC; JAMES L. JONES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-224-7-F-1)
2
3

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren B. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mark

Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina; Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS

& HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Warren B. Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting

the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his civil action stemming from

a previous military court conviction. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. United States

Sec’y of the Navy, No. CA-01-224-7-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 28, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131068 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131068 

 COA: 264280 

Tuscola CC: 01-008258-FH 

JEFFREY LLOYD GREENLEAF,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Presidential Documents

63035 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 197 

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8581 of October 8, 2010 

Leif Erikson Day, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Over 1,000 years ago, the lure of discovery led Leif Erikson—a son of 

Iceland and grandson of Norway—and his crew on an ambitious exploration 

of present-day Greenland and Canada. Centuries later, after a months-long 

ocean voyage, a group of Norwegians landed in New York City on October 

9, 1825, the first large group of immigrants to arrive in the United States 

from Norway. To commemorate that event and pay tribute to our rich 

Nordic-American heritage, we celebrate Leif Erikson Day in honor of the 

first European known to set foot on North American soil more than a 

millennium ago. 

Countless immigrants who crossed the Atlantic on voyages to the New 

World looked to Leif Erikson as a symbol of fortitude and a hero who 

did not turn back in the face of danger and uncertainty. Leif Erikson’s 

bold courage echoes in the daring and intrepid spirit of the pioneers who 

built and shaped our young country, and in the determination, self-reliance, 

and innovation of the Nordic settlers who made enduring contributions 

to the American character. Today, Nordic Americans immeasurably enrich 

our national life as neighbors and leaders in communities across America. 

Guided by the strength and resolve of Leif Erikson and the countless Nordic 

immigrants who came in his wake, let us steadfastly reach for the promise 

of tomorrow. It is their spirit of exploration and progress that helped forge 

our great country, and that will continue to guide us as we strive for 

a better and brighter future. 

To honor Leif Erikson and celebrate our Nordic-American heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88–566) approved on September 2, 

1964, has authorized the President to proclaim October 9 of each year 

as ‘‘Leif Erikson Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2010, as Leif Erikson Day. I 

call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, 

activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRD0
63036 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 13, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25967 

Filed 10–12–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRD0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
585 A.2d 408

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEWIS RAYMOND ABRAMS.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 372

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. J.S.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2014-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), for the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"). I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. Dated:  March 22, 2016             /s/ Brian T. Stevens Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
585 A.2d 411

#### DAVID BOCHICCHIO v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE AND ANTHONY SPINA. CARL C. STETZ v. DAVID BOCHICCHIO AND ANTHONY SPINA AND TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
The Attorney General of Texas 

September 28, 1978 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

Honorable Leonard Prewitt 

Executive Secretary 

Opinion No. Ii- 12 4 9 

Teacher Retirement System of Texas 

1001 Trinity Street 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Whether local school districts are permitted to pay the 

required employee contribution 

to the Teacher Retirement 

System. 

Dear Mr. Prewitt: 

You have requested our opinion regarding whether a local school district 

may pay the required employee contribution to the Teacher Retirement 

System. You state that a recent ruling indicates the intention of the Internal 

Revenue Service to exclude from gross income any portion of a teacher’s 

contribution to a state pension plan which is “picked up” by the school 

district. 

Section 3.57(b) of the Education Code requires that every employer 

shall deduct from the salary of each member [of the 

Teacher Retirement System] 6.65 percent of his 

compensation for each payroll period. 

In our opinion, this provision clearly means that the member is liable for 

payment of his own contribution. Other portions of section 3.57 support this 

view: 

(c) These deductions shall be made although they 

reduce a member’s minimum compensations provided by 

law. Every member shall be deemed to consent to the 

deductions made and the payment of his compensation, 

less said deductions, shall constitute a complete 

release of all claims, except for benefits provided 

under this chapter for service rendered by him during 

the payment period. 

. . . . 

p. 4963 

. 
Honorable Leonard Prewitt - Page 2 (H-1249) 

(g) If deductions which should have been made from any 

member’s salary were not in fact made, the member must 

pay these deductions, plus a five percent per annum fee on 

the unpaid amount from the end of the school year such 

deductions were due until the date of payment, on terms 

prescribed by the State Board of Trustees. . . . 

The Legislature has unequivocally expressed its intent that the member himself 

make the required contribution. As a result, we do not believe the statute can be 

construed, to permit an employer to assume that burden. We express no opinion as 

to the validity or effect under the tax ruling of a proposal by which a district would 

reimburse an employee for the deduction required by section 3.57(b). 

SUMMARY 

A local school district may not pay the required employee 

contribution to the Teacher Retirement System. 

Very truly yours, 

/ Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: w 

/ h’ 

d&d 

C. ROBERT HEATH. Chairman 

Opinion Committee ’ 

p. 4964
#### INTERSTATE PROPERTIES AND I.P. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 2, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, MacIntosh-NBAA Room and Hilton-ATA Room, Washington, DC 
20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access 
Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

November 2, 2010

<bullet> Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
<bullet> Agenda Overview
<bullet> RTCA Functional Overview
<bullet> Previous Committee History
<bullet> Current Committee Scope, Terms of Reference Overview 
(Presentation)
<bullet> Discussion of Terms of Reference for This Update
<bullet> Discussion of Scope/Areas for This Update
<bullet> Organization of Work, Assign Tasks and Workgroups
    <bullet> Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations
    <bullet> Assignment of Responsibilities
    <bullet> Other Business
    <bullet> Establish Agenda for Next Meeting
    <bullet> Date and Place of Next Meeting

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-25203 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### Martin Conley v. The Board of Supervisors of St. Clair County.

*Drains*— Jurisdiction *of county commissioner*— Assessment *of taxes.*

Sections 4 and 7 of chapter 2 of the drain law of 1885 (3 How. Stat. §§ 1740a7, 1740b) are construed:

a — As giving to the county drain commissioner concurrent jurisdiction with the township drain commissioner of drains *entirely*within the latter’s township.

b — As prohibiting the spreading of taxes for the construction of drains by such commissioner until all of the records thereof required to be made by him are filed with the county clerk.

*246
      *Mandamus.*

Submitted November 10, 1891.

Order to show cause denied November 11, 1891.

Eelator, as county drain commissioner, constructed a drain in tbe township of Casco, under application made therefor. The special assessment roll for the expense of such construction was laid before the respondent, who refused to order the same spread upon the township assessment roll, for the following reasons:

1. Because, the drain being wholly within the township of Casco, the relator should have filed the papers relating thereto with the township clerk of said township, which was not done.

2. Because relator did not file the papers and records relating to said drain with the county clerk.

Whereupon relator applied for an order to show cause why respondent should not be directed to order such assessment.

*Henry P. Jenney,*for relator.

Per, Curiam.

The tax cannot be levied in this case until all the records required by the statute (3 How. Stat.. § 1740a9) are deposited and filed in the office of the county clerk.

The drain is entirely within the limits of the township of Casco, but the county drain commissioner has concurrent jurisdiction with the township drain commissioner in such cases. The records, however, if he acts, must be filed in the county clerk’s office, and not with the township clerk.

3 How. Stat. § 17405, provides that—

> “No tax for the construction of a drain shall be spread upon the tax roll until all the records thereof, required to be made by such commissioner, are filed with the clerk.”

*247This statute evidently refers to all drains, by whomsoever laid.

As it is admitted by the petition that the statute has not been complied with in this respect, the -application, for an order to show cause will be denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
A. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By /s/ James A. White

---

Name: James A. White
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 10, 2004
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PIERO A. BUGONI
, Appellant,

v.

PAM BONDI, TAYLOR O’ BRIEN, LINDSAY TURNBULL,

SHARON BILU and JOHN MEGALLY
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 4242

[ November 16, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16 000420

.

Pier o A. Bugoni, Boca Raton, pro se

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carrol Y. Cherry Eaton, Sen ior Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee

Pam Bondi.

Richard C. McCrea, Jr., of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellees Taylor O'Brien, Lindsay Turnbull, Sharon Bilu and John Megally.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kenneth Cole Productions,
                     Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
                     2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
                     hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Edelman, Chief Financial Officer
                     of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
                     pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                     of the Company. /s/ DAVID P. EDELMAN  David P. EdelmanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.November 8, 2010
585 A.2d 345

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD JORDAN.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*115, 572 A.2d 676)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL O. PAGE.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.