alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|  | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. |
|--|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | · | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. |
|--|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. |
|--|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   |                                 |   | DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/    |  David Co                       |   |
|   |                                 |   | Name: David Co                       |   |
|   |                                 |   | Its: Director                        |   |
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/    |  Matt Bowen                     |   |
|   |                                 |   | Name: Matt Bowen                     |   |
|   |                                 |   | Its: Managing Director               |   |
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/    |  Kevin Fischer                  |   |
|   |                                 |   | Name: Kevin Fischer                  |   |
|   |                                 |   | Its: Director                        |   |
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS |   |
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/    |  David Co                       |   |
|   |                                 |   | Name: David Co                       |   |
|   |                                 |   | Its: Director                        |   |
|   |                                 |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/    |  Jenna Kaufman                  |   |
|   |                                 |   | Name: Jenna Kaufman                  |   |
|   |                                 |   | Its: Director                        |   |

----
Opinion issued November 8, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00623-CV

———————————

OPAJ, LP, TRACY V. PATTON, SVP INVESTMENTS I, LLC, 

AND CHAD M. PATTON, Appellants

V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 67th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas1

Trial Court Cause No. 067-256386-11

 

1 Pursuant to its docket equalization authority, the Supreme Court of Texas 

transferred the appeal to this Court. See Misc. Docket No. 12–9107 (Tex. Jun. 18, 

2012); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §.73.001 (West 2005) (authorizing 

transfer of cases).
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
#### GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DAVID SALTMAN.

November 2, 1987.

Petition for certification denied. (See 219 *N.J.Super.*1)
Exhibit 4.1

	
	



Number C-____  ________ Shares
  Common Stock

THIS CERTIFIES THAT __________ is the record holder of (_____________) __________________ shares of
Common Stock of
Solid Power, Inc.
a Delaware corporation
transferable only on the records of the corporation upon surrender of this certificate, properly endorsed or assigned.
This certificate and the shares it represents are subject to the provisions of the Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the corporation, and any amendments thereto, as
well as the restrictive legends on the back of this certificate. The corporation will furnish without charge to each
stockholder who so requests a statement describing the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of
such preferences and/or rights.
The corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers as of ____________, 20__.


Secretary  President
 





	
	


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, I HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER ___________ SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE TO ______________________ AND HEREBY IRREVOCABLY APPOINT ____________________________ AS
ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THESE SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE CORPORATION.

DATED
 (Stockholder)


(Witness) (Stockholder)

NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND EXACTLY WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
ON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE.
585 A.2d 345

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ARTIS KATO.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. SER GIO M ENDEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10443

D.C . No. 2:11-c r-00356-KJM M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Kim be rly J. M ue lle r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, R

AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Se rgio M e nde z a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha l le nge s the 262-m onth se nte nc e im

pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for c onspira c y to distributeand distribution of m e tha m phe tam ine in viola

t ion of 21 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED

FEB 29 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§§ 841(a)(1) an d 846. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . M e nde z argue s tha

t the distric t

c o urt proc e dura lly

e rre d by m isunde rsta

nding its se nte nc i ng disc re tion a nd pre sum ing a

Guide line se nte nc e wa s re a sona ble . W e re vie w for pla in e rror, s e eUnite d State s v . Dallman , 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd find none . Eve n if the distric t c ourt’ s a m b iguous sta

t e m e nt a t the se nte nc ing he aring re ga

rding theothe r branc he s of gove rnm e nt c onstitute s e rror, M e n de z h a s not shown tha t the e rror a ffe c te d his substa ntia l rights. Se eid. In light of the distric t c ourt’ s disc u s sion of thea ggravating a n d m itiga ting fa c tors in M e n de z ’ s c a se , he ha s not shown a re a sona b le proba bility tha t he would ha

ve re c e ive d a

diffe re nt se nte n c e a

bse nt thea lle ge d e rror. Se eid . at 762. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 4 4 3 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY PHIPPS.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 78 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-63505) and Amendment No. 612 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 9, 2021, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2021, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 10, 2021
#### IN THE MATTER OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS # 545.

November 18, 1986.

The Court having remanded this matter to the Committee to develop a record pursuant to the Order of October 5, 1985,

And the Committee having held a hearing, having received written comments, and having determined that a modification of Opinion # 545 was appropriate,

And the Court having accepted the revised opinion of the Committee,

And all parties and the Court having concluded that the modification eliminated the need for further Court review;

It is ORDERED that the within appeals are dismissed as moot. (See 102 *N.J.*339).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 22, 2018

NO. 03-16-00789-CV

Pine Forest Investments Group, LLC, Appellant

v.

The County of Bastrop, Texas; The Bastrop Independent School District; 

and the City of Bastrop, Texas, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 21, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the portions of the judgment related to the 

appellant’s Texas Open Meetings Act counterclaims; we affirm the remaining portions of the 

judgment. We remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the 

Court’s opinion. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court 

and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PRA Health Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda Baddour, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 3, 2015

By:

/s/ LINDA BADDOUR Linda Baddour Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Libelant-Appellee, v. EASTPORT STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and Seaboard Surety Company, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 197, Docket 28454.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 21, 1963.

Decided June 8, 1964.

*790Lawrence F. Ledebur, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., (John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Leavenworth Colby, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellee.

J. Franklin Fort, Washington, D. C. (Francis J. O’Brien, Zock, Petrie, Sheneman & Reid, New York City, T. S. L. Perlman, J. Lovering Truscott, and Kominers & Fort, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The sole" issue presented in this case is whether the Maritime Commission was acting within its authority in setting a particular formula for calculating charter hire in the bareboat charter of the SS Denison Victory from the United States to Eastport Steamship Corporation entered into in 1951.

After careful consideration of the arguments advanced by each side, we were of the opinion that the decision below should be affirmed for the reasons so ably stated in the District Court and Circuit Court opinions in Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates v. United States, D.C.Mass., 1962, 202 F. Supp. 297, aff'd, 1 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 214, aff’d, 1964, 84 S.Ct. 1236, and incorporated by reference in the opinion of Judge Levet below. However, as certiorari had been granted to review the decision of the First Circuit in that case, and since we had no new ideas to contribute, we decided to postpone our disposition of this appeal until after the Supreme Court decided the Eastern Gas case.

Now that we have had an opportunity to examine the opinion of the Supreme. Court in Eastern Gas, 1964, 84 S.Ct. 1236,. we find that each of the arguments advanced here by Eastport has been considered and disposed of by the Supreme Court.

Accordingly, the decree below is affirmed.
585 A.2d 387

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TERESA MOORE.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert MICKEL.

No. 2010-K-1357.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Mickel, Albert.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 09-2206; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-953.

Denied.

JOHNSON and WEIMER, JJ., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         904,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               92,436,356
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,591,202)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,184,506
<PP&E>                                       4,546,557
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,651,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,829,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,818,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,986,444
<COMMON>                                        35,607
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,988,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,829,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,650,034
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,013,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,281,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,534)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (40,566)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that, to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to
be executed this 13th day of April, 2011.



/s/ Harley E Barnes IIIName:

Harley E Barnes IIITitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATION



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with Affimed N.V.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Adi Hoess,
Chief Executive Officer of Affimed N.V., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
                                         Act; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of Affimed N.V.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March
30, 2017



|/s/ Adi Hoess           | 
|----------------------- | 
|Name: Adi Hoess         | 
|Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financialstatements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      8,200,631
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,381,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                27,222
<INVENTORY>                                 1,291,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,108,965
<PP&E>                                      107,958
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,978,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,717,328
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    6,077
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,254,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,978,312
<SALES>                                     7,170,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            7,170,581
<CGS>                                       7,112,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               7,112,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          32,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (426,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (426,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (426,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.10)


</TABLE>
District Metals Corp.: Exhibit 4.24 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    June 25, 2020

    Viad Royalties AB

    c/o Nordfors Consulting AB 
S:t Eriksgatan 117, plan 4

    113 43 Stockholm
Sweden

    Attention: Eric Jensen, General Manager, Exploration

    Dear Sirs:

    Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement

    We refer to the purchase and sale agreement dated February 27, 2020 and that letter agreement dated May 7, 2020 and June 19, 2020 (together, the "Purchase Agreement"), each among District Metals Corp. (on its own behalf, "Buyer Guarantor" and in trust for and on behalf of a wholly- owned subsidiary to be incorporated under the laws of Sweden, "Buyer") and Viad Royalties AB (the "Seller"). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

    The parties hereby agree, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged as follows:

    1. That pursuant to Section 10.5 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, both instances of "June 22, 2020" in Section 6.1 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement are deleted and replaced with "July 1, 2020".

    2. The Parties confirm that the Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended by this Letter Agreement, remains in full force and effect.

    3. From the date hereof, the Purchase and Sale Agreement and this Letter Agreement shall be read together to the extent reasonably possible as though all of the terms of both documents were contained in one instrument.

    4. This Letter Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

    5. This Letter Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and any applicable federal laws of Canada.

    6. This Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts and evidenced by an electronic copy thereof and all such counterparts or electronic counterparts shall constitute one document.

    

    - 2 -

    Yours very truly,

    DISTRICT METALS CORP. (on its 
behalf and in trust for and on behalf 
of Buyer Subco)

    	Per:	/s/ Garrett Ainsworth	 
	 	Name: Garrett Ainsworth
Title: President, CEO, Director	 


     

    THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER AGREEMENT are hereby accepted as of the 25th day of June, 2020.

    VIAD ROYALTIES AB

    	Per:	/s/ David M. Cole	 
	 	Name:  David M. Cole
Title:    President and CEO
585 A.2d 342

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAUL CUCO JIMINEZ.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.