alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4



LOGO

2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2014 by and among Morgan Stanley
Capital I, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Citibank, N.A. as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association as Custodian and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, relating to Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2014-C17 (MSBAM 2014-C17)

The undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and
if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------
|              |  |                                |  | 
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  |  |  | Date: March 1, 2018
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |  |  |
584 A.2d 217

#### HERMAN L. WALDMAN v. SUSAN WALDMAN.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 31197 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
BRANDON J. THOMAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10

- CR

- 20 6

- 1

Before Davis, Clement, and Costa, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Brandon J. Thomas appeals the 90

- month term of imprisonment imposed on resentencing for his conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base

. Thomas argues that the district court erroneously based the upward variance on his prior involvement in dog fightin g and thus his sentence is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)( 2)

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 4, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-31197 Document: 00512925990 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2015No. 13

- 31197

In response to Thomas’s challenge to the substantive reasonableness of his sentence, the Government argues, among other things , that this cou rt should dismiss Thomas’s appeal based upon the plea agreement’s appeal waiver. Pursuant to the terms of the waiver, Thomas waived the right to directly appeal his sentence on any ground, reserving only the right to challenge any sentence imposed in exce ss of the statutory maximum ; this
waiver includes the instant substantive reasonableness challenge. Because the appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary and because the Government seeks the enforcement of the appeal waiver, the appeal is dism issed. See United States v. Walters , 732 F.3d 489, 491 (5th Cir. 2013), cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 1349 (2014).
APPEAL DISMISSED.

2 Case: 13-31197 Document: 00512925990 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/04/2015
# News Releases

## Media Inquiries:

**Frances Alonzo**202-997-6977Alonzo.Frances@dol.gov

**Patrick Malone**202-997-3512Malone.Patrick.M@dol.gov

----

April 16, 2024

### Remarks by Acting Secretary Su announcing a final rule to reduce miners’ exposure to silica dust, improve health of nation’s miners

April 16, 2024

### Department of Labor issues final rule reducing silica dust exposure,   better protecting miners’ health from irreversible workplace illnesses

April 15, 2024

### Acting Secretary Su, Assistant Secretary Williamson to visit  Pennsylvania to announce efforts to protect miners’ safety, health

April 1, 2024

### US Department of Labor to hold benefits assistance events in Pennsylvania for current, former coal miners disabled by black lung disease, survivors 

March 25, 2024

### Department of Labor announces findings of February 2024 impact inspections completed at 13 mines with histories of repeated safety, health violations 

March 6, 2024

### US Department of Labor launches tool to help miners, mining communities

February 26, 2024

### Department of Labor completed impact inspections at 15 mines with histories of repeated health, safety violations in January 2024

February 1, 2024

### Department of Labor conducted second Pattern of Violations screening to protect miners in 2023; identifies chronic violator 

January 29, 2024

### Department of Labor completed impact inspections at 16 mines with histories of repeated health, safety violations in December 2023

December 21, 2023

### Department of Labor completed impact inspections at 14 mines  with histories of repeated safety, health violations in November 2023

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
- 
-  … 
- 
-  Next page› 
- 
-  Last pageLast ›› 

----

MSHA News Release Archives
Since October 2020, four massive pillar collapses have occurred in limestone 

mines. Each was accompanied by a powerful airblast and the formation of a 

large surface sinkhole. Fortunately they did not result in any injuries. In 2015, 

three miners were seriously injured by an airblast from a fifth pillar collapse. 

All of these collapses involved tall, slender pillars in benched areas. Four were in 

“legacy” areas that had been mined many years ago.

At this seminar, MSHA Technical Support’s Roof Control Division will be 

providing information to raise awareness of these collapse events. They will also 

present ways to assess and mitigate the risks associated with a massive 

collapses in both active workings and legacy areas.

Presentation topics:

1) Overview of recent limestone pillar collapse events

2) Limestone pillar design using the NIOSH S-Pillar program

3) Risk Analysis for limestone pillar collapse

4) Investigation and analysis of airblast risk from pillar collapse

The Seminar will be presented remotely via Microsoft TEAMS.

A certificate for four (4) Professional Development Hours (PDHs) will be 

provided to participants. Please register at least 3 business days prior to 

the seminar to receive the meeting invitation. 

To Register or Questions, email: PillarInitiative@dol.gov

When registering, please provide your full name, 

company or organization, phone number, and the date of 

the seminar you would like to attend. 

For more information, visit www.msha.gov/PillarInitiative 

MSHA NORTON DISTRICT 

STONE MINE PILLAR COLLAPSE SEMINAR 

January 12, 2022 8:00am - 12:00pm (ET)
585 A.2d 368

#### LINDA BOMBACE v. THE CITY OF NEWARK.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*1, 574 A.2d 49)
#### Jessica M. SMART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 470, Docket 28757.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 12, 1964.

Decided May 12, 1964.

*284Shephard Kole, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert Arum, Asst. U. C. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York, New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge.*

*

 Sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

We do not believe that the 1960 amendments to the Social Security Laws worked an arbitrary or unconstitutional classification by labelling the plaintiff as “self-employed.” The question in cases of this sort is whether the legislative classification has a rational basis. See Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co., 301 U.S. 495, 509, 57 S.Ct. 868, 81 L.Ed. 1245 (1937). Since Congress *could not*tax the international organization which employed the plaintiff, its decision that it *would not*do so was hardly irrational, and its treatment of the plaintiff *as if*“self-employed” was not unreasonable.

We affirm in open court Judge Dawson’s award of judgment on the pleadings. 222 F.Supp. 65 (S.D.N.Y.1963).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0056

_________________

JOHN RICHARDS, LINDA MILLER and 

LARRY RICHARDS,

 Petitioners and Appellants,

 v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL 

RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellants John Richards, Linda Miller, and Larry Richards were granted an 

extension of time to file and serve their opening brief(s) on or before October 28, 2021. 

The opening brief is now overdue.

THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the opening brief(s)

on appeal no later than December 2, 2021. Failure to file the brief within that time will 

result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to Appellants John Richards, 

Linda Miller, and Larry Richards and to all counsel of record. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 2 2021

11/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0056
Motion Denied; Order filed January 8, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00272-CR

____________

JEREMY PATRICK SHAKESNIDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCR-59007A

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Michael W. Elliott. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due October 8, 2014. We granted a total of 82

days extension of time to file appellant’s brief until December 29, 2014. When we 

granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted 

absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On December 31, 2014, 
counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. 

Counsel did not allege any exceptional circumstances in the request. 

We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.

Accordingly, we order Michael W. Elliott to file a brief with the clerk of this 

Court on or before January 29, 2015. If counsel does not timely file appellant’s 

brief as ordered, the Court will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the 

trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the 

brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other 

appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise
#### William F. Seely v. William O’Conner, and Henry O. Bevier v. William O’Conner.

[Two cases.]

*Bill to quiet title.*

These cases are ruled by *Wolf v. O'Gonner, ante,*124.

Rehearings, upon application of complainants, of cases reported in 83 Mich. 310.

Submitted January 8, 1891.

Decrees affirmed October 30, 1891.

6?. *A. Wolf (E. F. Uhl,*of couns,el), for complainants..

*Riissell G. Ostrander,*for defendant.

Champlin,. C. J.

In these causes the decrees of the court below will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion upon rehearing in *Wolf v. O’Conner,*88 Mich. 124.

The other Justices concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be held Wednesday, November 10, 
2010, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public 
is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, 
please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write 
TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, 
or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: October 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-25475 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
CERTIFICATION



Re:Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C17(the “Transaction”), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), executed in connection with the Transaction (capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

__________________________________________



I, Jane Lam, certify that:



1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C17 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and



5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:



---





• Citibank, N.A., as Trustee


• Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator


• Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian


• Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian


• Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer


• Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer


• Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor


• CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant




2



---



Date:  March 24, 2023





By/s/ Jane Lam

Name: Jane Lam

Title: President



3



---
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD PERALES.

October 20, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 834 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 834

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to 
 Doris Miller for acts of valor during World War II while a member of 
                               the Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2017

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to 
 Doris Miller for acts of valor during World War II while a member of 
                               the Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO DORIS MILLER 
              FOR ACTS OF VALOR AS A MEMBER OF THE NAVY DURING WORLD 
              WAR II.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sections 6248(a) 
and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 
with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in 
the Armed Forces, the President is authorized to award the Medal of 
Honor posthumously under section 6241 of such title to Doris Miller 
(service number 356-12-35) for acts of valor during World War II while 
a member of the United States Navy.
                                 <all>
```
2021 MSHA Fatalities

6/9/21 – 9/21/21

MSHA Stakeholder Meeting

September 29, 2021
Accident Classifications

1

Powered Haulage, 

5

Falling or 

Handling 

Material, 2

Fall of Roof or Rib, 

1

Inundation, 1

Machinery, 1

Slip or Fall of 

Person, 1

Confined Space, 1
Number of Employees

2

19 or less

2

20-49

2

50 or more

8
Age

3

31-40

3

41-50

2

51-60

2

Over 60

5
Experience at the Mine

4

1 Yr or Less

4

>1 to 2 Yrs

1 >2 to 4 Yrs

1

>8 to 10 Yrs

1

>10 Yrs

4

*11 fatalities
Experience at the Activity

5

*11 fatalities

1 Yr or Less

3

>1 to 2 Yrs

1

>8 to 10 Yrs

1

>10 Yrs

6
Two miners traveling in 

a personnel carrier 

collided with a 

locomotive traveling in 

the opposite direction.

A rock fell from 40 feet 

striking a miner in a 

personnel lift.

A contract employee, 

who was not wearing 

fall protection when a 

wooden board broke, 

fell 23 feet onto a 

concrete floor.

A miner was standing on 

a rock ledge when a 

triangular section of the 

rock broke, causing him 

to fall approximately 47 

feet.

6
A miner was working 

under a boom while 

removing the boom pins 

when he was struck by 

the boom.

A miner was run over by 

a customer tractortrailer while walking to 

his work area.

A miner drowned during 

a flash flood while 

traveling in a personnel 

carrier to go to the mine 

portal. 

A contract truck driver 

was run over when his 

truck rolled forward 

while he conducted a 

pre-operational 

examination of the 

truck. 

7
A person entered a 

trench to search for 

gold when the walls of 

the trench collapsed on 

him. 

A truck driver was found 

lying in front of his truck 

near the edge of the 

haul road. The truck 

was upright and in the 

opposite direction of 

the expected route of 

travel.

While welding a pipe 

joint, a welder 

entered the pipe to 

troubleshoot issues 

related to argon gas 

leakage. Coworkers 

found him 

unresponsive inside 

the pipe.

8
Best Practices

9
Powered Haulage

• Establish and maintain effective communication protocols 

that require identification, location, and intended route of 

travel.

• Make sure vehicle is in park and brake is set. Block parked 

mobile equipment against motion. Adequately chock wheels 

or turn wheels into a bank.

10
Fall of Material, Machinery, Fall of Person

• Use scaling equipment, suitable for the mining height, to 

maintain safe ground conditions.

• Never perform work under raised machinery or equipment 

until it has been securely blocked and secured against 

motion.

• Use fall protection when a fall hazard exists. Ensure fall 

protection has a suitable fall arrest and secure anchorage 

system.

11
Examinations, Inundation

• Examine working places to identify loose ground or unstable 

conditions before work begins, after blasting, and as 

changing ground conditions warrant. Ensure examiners have 

adequate training and experience to recognize potential 

hazards. 

• Establish policies and procedures to provide adequate 

warning to all mine personnel of adverse weather 

conditions, e.g. flash floods, extreme winds, etc.

12
585 A.2d 401

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAN ERIC REYNOLDS.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.