alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,927,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,377,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                    89,713
<INVENTORY>                                  1,204,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,747,145
<PP&E>                                       7,757,743
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,973,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,793,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,327,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,234
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,979,798)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,793,370
<SALES>                                    105,257,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           105,257,875
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              121,375,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,654,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (15,654,184)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,654,184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,654,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.73)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Robert H. BarghausRobert H. BarghausVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 4, 2010






This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2498

REGINALD D. EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TIME WARNER CABLE, INCORPORATED; TIME WARNER

CABLE, South Carolina Division,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-1003-3-17BC)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Rogers Ellerbe, III,

ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his complaint pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 532 (2000) for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Evans v. Time Warner Cable, No.

CA-04-1003-3-17BC (D.S.C. filed Nov. 4, 2004 & entered Nov. 5,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SALEEM ALI.

November 17, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 399

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANGEL HERNANDEZ.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,604,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,335,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,020
<INVENTORY>                                    890,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,382,206
<PP&E>                                       5,703,539
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,647,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,970,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,024,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,766
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,902,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,970,597
<SALES>                                     83,435,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,435,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,161,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,895,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,895,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,895,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51085

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOE ALBERT ALVARADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-99-CR-279-ALL-JN

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Attorney Jesse Z. Weiss, appointed to represent Joe Albert

Alvarado, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of

Alvarado and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Attorney Weiss also has filed an addendum to

the Anders brief. Alvarado has filed responses to the Anders

motion and brief and to the addendum, and he moves for leave to

proceed pro se; for leave to supplement the record with
No. 00-51085

-2-

transcripts; and for leave to file a declaration. Our

independent review of the brief, the addendum, the responses, and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Weiss’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED; Weiss is excused from further

responsibilities herein; Alvarado’s motions are DENIED; and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Exhibit 12.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jan Møller Mikkelsen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ascendis Pharma A/S (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.





|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|Date:  |  | March 26, 2015          
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Jan Møller Mikkelsen
|Name:  |  | Jan Møller Mikkelsen    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Department of Labor 

Mine Safety and Health Administration

Mine Operator Identification Request 

Approved OMB No.: 1219-0042 / Expires: Dec. 31, 2023

Mine Identification Number Check Appropriate Box

 Metal/Nonmetal Coal Date

Operating Company Name

Mine/Plant Name

Mailing Address For Document Delivery (Same as on Legal Identity Form)

City State Zip Code

Contact Official Title Phone

Nearest Town to Mine State County

Status Date Office Code County Code (FIPS)

Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 20 minutes per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, 

searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and submitting the form. This collection of information is 

mandatory. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding 

the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to: Mine Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 

Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401., Arlington, VA 22202-5452, Paperwork Reduction Project 

(1219-0042). NOTE: Do not send your completed form to this address. 

This form is affected by the Privacy Act of 1974

Mine Type (Subunit) (01) Underground

 (03) Strip, Quarry, Pit, Dragline

 (04) Auger

 (05) Culm Bank, Refuse Pile

 (06) Dredge

 (12) Other Mining

 (17) Independent Shops & Yards

 (30) Prep Plant, Mill, Tipple

Metal/Nonmetal Mine Data

Status of Operation SIC Code Travel Area

Coal Mine Data

ADIB Use 

Status of Operation SIC Code Work Group

District/Field Office

Name of MSHA Employee Requesting Number

Office Telephone FAX Number

FAX Verification

Coder Number:

Attn: ADIB

FAX Number: Attn:

Date

Date

Time:

Time:

Sender

Sender

AA AD CF CG BA

AC BD BC BB

BE

AB

CH

CB

MSHA 7000-51 

Mar 2022

FAX Number:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 17, 2010
    /s/  Laurie L. LathamLaurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services,a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv),which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 forthe Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
584 A.2d 218

#### ROBERT NOYE v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.

May 15, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*430, 570 A.2d 12)
585 A.2d 412

#### SUSAN JONES v. ROBERT JONES.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 242 *N.J.Super.*195, 576 A.2d 316)
# ARKANSAS

## State of Arkansas Program Summary

**Ralph Hudson, Director****John Boswell, Education & Instruction Coordinator**

**Arkansas Department of Labor and Licensing****900 West Capitol, Suite 400****Little Rock AR, 72201**

The primary emphasis of the Arkansas Mine Safety and Health program is to provide training opportunities for surface mine operators and contractors that support accident prevention and hazard recognition to keep mining facilities in compliance with Federal MSHA and ANSI regulations. Courses offered by the Arkansas MSHA Program include:
                - 30 CFR parts 46 and 48, New Miner (16 hours of the required 24 hours);
                - 30 CFR parts 46 and 48, Annual Refresher (8 hours);
                - Cooperative Instructor conducted by EFSMS (24 hours);
                - Basic First Aid (5 hours);
                - CPR & AED (3 hours)

Regional seminars on specific current health and safety hazards can be conducted across the state as needed. The program assists the industry coordinated annual State MSHA conference to provide a forum for the mining community to focus on current mine safety and health topics, activities and initiatives for mine managers, mine safety professionals, and miners. In coordination with EFSMS and mining industry, meetings of the Holmes Safety Association Councils can be conducted upon request.

For more information contact John Boswell at 501-690-8392 or by e-mail at John.Boswell@arkansas.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Senior Executive Service; Legal Division Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of members of the Legal Division Performance Review 
Board (PRB).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Legal Division PRB. The purpose of this 
Board is to review and make recommendations concerning proposed 
performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, and other appropriate 
personnel actions for incumbents of SES positions in the Legal 
Division.

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3000, 
Washington, DC 20220, Telephone: (202) 622-0283 (this is not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Composition of Legal Division PRB

    The Board shall consist of at least three members. In the case of 
an appraisal of a career appointee, more than half the members shall 
consist of career appointees. Composition of the specific PRBs will be 
determined on an ad hoc basis from among the individuals listed in this 
notice.
    The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows:

Rupa Bhattacharyya, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (International 
Affairs);
Peter A. Bieger, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Banking and 
Finance);
George Bostick, Benefits Tax Counsel;
Manal Corwin, International Tax Counsel;
Himamauli Das, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs);
Rochelle F. Granat, Assistant General Counsel (General Law, Ethics and 
Regulation);
Richard G. Lepley, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (General Law and 
Regulation);
M.J.K. Maher, Jr., Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & 
Intelligence);
Margaret V. Marquette, Chief Counsel, Financial Management Service;
Christopher J. Meade, Principal Deputy General Counsel;
Mark Monborne, Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & Intelligence);
Clarissa C. Potter, Deputy Chief Counsel (Technical), Internal Revenue 
Service;
Kevin Rice, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Engraving and Printing;
Laurie Schaffer, Assistant General Counsel (Banking and Finance);
Daniel P. Shaver, Chief Counsel, United States Mint;
Sean M. Thornton, Chief Counsel, Office of Foreign Assets Control;
Robert M. Tobiassen, Chief Counsel, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 
Bureau;
Christian A. Weideman, Deputy General Counsel;
William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service; and
Paul Wolfteich, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Public Debt.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
George W. Madison,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-25726 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P