alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A93A0030.

#### GRISSON v. THE STATE.

(431 SE2d 468)

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of driving under the influence. In his sole enumeration of error, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to exclude the results of the State’s breath test because he was denied his right to an independent test of his own choosing pursuant to OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3).

After a hearing on the motion in limine, the trial court found that appellant was afforded the opportunity to request an independent test, that he did request such a test, and that the independent test was performed as requested. Appellant argues that the evidence at the hearing was not sufficient to support these findings. However, *680the hearing was not recorded. Error must be shown by the record rather than by brief, and “absent a transcript, ‘we must assume the ruling of the trial court is supported by the evidence.’ [Cit.]” *Odom v. State,*196 Ga. App. 293 (3) (396 SE2d 27) (1990). Accordingly, this argument is without merit and the judgment must be affirmed.

Decided May 24, 1993.

*Darryl K. Brown,*for appellant.

*Kenneth W. Mauldin, Solicitor,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Beasley, P. J., concur.*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Michael Forster, Chief Executive Officer of
Power-Save Energy Company (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:





1.


the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and





2.


the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 12, 2008
            /s/Michael
      Forster
              Michael
      Forster
              Chief
      Executive Officer
585 A.2d 373

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD A. PENDLETON.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
868 A.2d 289

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY M. SUPINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 024031988).

February 25, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-253, concluding that ANTHONY M. SUPINO of BEACH HAVEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*3.2 (failure to treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process), *RPC*3.4(g) (presenting, participating in presenting, or threatening to present criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter), *RPC*3.5(e) (conduct intending to disrupt a tribunal), and *RPC*8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); c

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should submit proof of his fitness to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY M. SUPINO is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 23, 2005; and it is further

ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent shall demonstrate his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that he comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(e), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *531
      *Rule*l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
No. 87-1159.

#### CNA Financial Corp. et al. *v.*McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Henry Adam BALTAZAR, et al. v. Dennis R. WOLINSKI, et al.

No. 2011-C-0058.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

*476In re Continental Casualty Company; Kirpatrick Industrial Supply, Inc.; Wolin-ski, Dennis R. et al.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 71088; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 10-0757,10-0758.

Denied.
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 604 CITY OF GREAT FALLS ,

P la intiff and Appellee , v. JASON BRYAN MARTIN ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a n extension of ti me, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to an d including Ju ly 2 5 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0604
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Bearden, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hortonworks, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hortonworks, Inc.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 27, 2015 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Robert Bearden     
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Robert Bearden         
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, Scott Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hortonworks, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hortonworks, Inc.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 27, 2015 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott Davidson     
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Scott Davidson         
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
585 A.2d 362

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL J. BEATTY.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Order entered August 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00801-CV

JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

V.

JUDGE PAUL MCNULTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-01611-2015

ORDER

Appellant has filed a “plea to the jurisdiction and request to realign the parties,” asking 

the Court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over his appeal from the trial court’s purported 

May 18, 2015 order of dismissal and the trial court’s June 25, 2015 order declaring him a 

vexatious litigant. So that the Court may determine its jurisdiction, the Court ORDERS 

appellant to file, no later than September 1, 2015, a letter brief addressing the Court’s 

jurisdiction. The Court further ORDERS appellee to file a response no later than September 11, 

2015. If either party relies on information not before this Court, that party must obtain a 

supplemental clerk’s record from the trial court containing that information. The parties are 

cautioned that no extensions will be granted.
In light of this order, we SUSPEND the (1) August 24, 2015 deadline for appellant to 

pay, or make arrangements to pay, for the clerk’s and reporter’s records; and (2) August 31, 2015 

deadline for appellant to file written verification he has paid or made arrangements to pay for the 

record. 

 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Mariposa Health Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended June 30,
2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Lynn,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification accompanies the Report
and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



|                 | /s/ Kevin Lynn         
|---------------- | -----------------------
|                 | Kevin Lynn             
|                 | Chief Financial Officer
|October 21, 2015 |
DENY and Opinion File d March 21, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01370-CV IN RE TARA MCDANIEL, Relator Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-07909 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Reichek In her December 28, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator complains that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) denying her plea in abatement and (2) disqualifying her attorney Aaron Cartwright. We strike the petition in part and deny the remainder of the petition. At the threshold, we strike the por tion of the petition seeking mandamus relief from the denial of relator’s plea in ab atement. Because we questioned whether Cartwright may represent relator in this or iginal proceeding in light of the trial court’s disqualification order, we requested letter briefing regarding this issue. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, we co nclude that Cartwright is prohibited from representing relator in this mandamus procee ding with respect to the abatement issue–2– because it is part of the underlying matter a nd the trial court’s disqualification order, which has not been stayed , remains in effect. In any event, relator has failed to show her entitlement to mandamus relief for both issues. Entitlement to mandamus relief re quires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal.
See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and th e record before us, we conclude that relator has not made this showing for both issues. Accordingly, we strike the petition in part and deny the remainder of the petition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

221370F.P05 /Amanda L. Reichek / AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-GC23 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.; BellOak, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC.



Date:	March 29, 2024

/s/ Richard Simpson___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2014-GC23 Certifications


---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Review of 
P01 Application: Molecular Basis of Pediatric Formulation Design.
    Date: November 3, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#394a5258575d584a58795458505517575051175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82f1e9e3ece6e3f1e3c2efe3ebeeacecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25632 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2904

_____________________________

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY serviced by ESIS WC 

CLAIMS and FOX RENT-A-CAR,

INC.,

Appellants,

v.

JACOBY C. GRAGGS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.

Edward Almeyda, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 8, 2022.

September 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

William H. Rogner, Orlando, for Appellants.

Kenneth B. Schwartz of Gordon & Partners, P.A., North Palm 

Beach, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from consolidated financial
statements for the period ending June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,672
<PP&E>                                         581,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 760,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,299
<BONDS>                                        391,006
<COMMON>                                           204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   760,115
<SALES>                                        101,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,829
<CGS>                                           56,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      16,652,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,715,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                   137,373
<INVENTORY>                                    999,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,521,836
<PP&E>                                       7,246,795
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,548,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,925,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       58,584,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,226
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,134,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,925,365
<SALES>                                     72,169,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,169,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               76,661,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,134,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,134,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,134,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD J. ROWE.

December 8, 1987.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Artarus Manche JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-3916.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

Artarus Manche Jackson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See Baker v. State, 878*So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.