alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
649 A.2d 852

#### IN THE MATTER OF HUBERT JOHNSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 21, 1994.

ORDER

HUBERT JOHNSON of PETROS, TENNESSEE who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, having been convicted of first-degree murder, in violation of *T.C.A.*39-13-202, and attempted first-degree murder, in violation of *T.C.A.*39-12-101, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 6(b)(1), HUBERT JOHNSON is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

*172ORDERED that HUBERT JOHNSON be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that HUBERT JOHNSON comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

A pril 29 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk April 29 , 2016

152562 (77)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 152562

v COA: 316467

Wayne CC: 08

- 009312

- FC

DAVID ROARK,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellee to extend the time

for filing h is supplemental brief to J une 24 , 2016, is GRANTED. The time for fili ng the

supplemental brief of plaintiff

- appellant is also extended to J une 24 , 2016.
Exhibit 12.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Yoav
Doppelt, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Kenon Holdings Ltd.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:  |  | April 21, 2017         
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Yoav Doppelt       
|Name:  |  | Yoav Doppelt           
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBlyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending April 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus                         |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 4, 2004                        |

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not forany other purpose.

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
I, James A. White, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004
By: /s/ James A. White
584 A.2d 244

#### EDWARD MAHER v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC., ET AL.

June 11, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 239 *N.J.Super.*213, 570 A.2d 1289)
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 834 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously 

to Doris Miller for acts of valor during World War II while a member 

of the Navy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

posthumously to Doris Miller for acts of valor during 

World War II while a member of the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF 

4 HONOR TO DORIS MILLER FOR ACTS OF 

5 VALOR AS A MEMBER OF THE NAVY DURING 

6 WORLD WAR II. 

7 Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sec8 tions 6248(a) and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, 

9 or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 834 IH

1 of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

2 Forces, the President is authorized to award the Medal 

3 of Honor posthumously under section 6241 of such title 

4 to Doris Miller (service number 356–12–35) for acts of 

5 valor during World War II while a member of the United 

6 States Navy. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1


 


Essential Utilities, Inc.


Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation, effective January 1, 2022 


 


At its regularly scheduled meeting on December 6, 2021, the Board of Directors
of Essential Utilities, Inc., upon the recommendation of its Executive Compensation Committee and its Corporate Governance Committee,
approved increases in the annual cash retainer and annual stock retainer paid to all non-employee directors. Following such approval,
the compensation program for non-employee directors of Essential Utilities, Inc. is:


 


		·	an annual cash retainer of $105,000; 



		·	an additional annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee of $15,000;




		·	an additional annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee of $20,000; 



		·	an additional annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of $15,000; 



		·	an additional annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Risk Mitigation Committee of $15,000; 



		·	an additional annual cash retainer for the Lead Independent Director of $30,000; and



		·	an annual stock grant to non-employee directors of $110,000. 



All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with attendance at Board or Committee meetings.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEE ANDREW MOORE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 373 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Thi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

The pane l unani m ous l y f i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a) (2). j l f/ Inv en t o ry NOT F OR P UB L I CA T I ON

UN I TE D STATE S COURT OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CI RCUI T J OS E M E R C E DE S AY AL A, P et i t i o n er, v. E R IC H . H O L D E R J r., A tto rn e y G e n e ra l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71869 A ge nc y N o. A 075- 659- 690 M E M OR AN DU M *

O n Pet i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ard o f I m m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls Subm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efore: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , A N D T A S H IM A , C i rcuitJu d g es. J os e M e r c e de s A ya l a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of El Sal va dor , pe t i t i ons f or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ' de c i s i on a f f i rm i ng the i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ' s d e n ia l o f

h is ap p li c a ti o n f

o ra s y lu m . W e h a v e ju r is d ic ti o n u n d e r8 U .S .C . §



# FI L ED NOV 30 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U . S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALSj l f

/ I nvent ory 08- 71869 2 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rs ub s ta n ti a l e v id e n c e , Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F. 3d 7 3 8 , 7 4 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , an dwe d e n y th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he r ec ord do es no tcom pel r ever sa l of the I J' s c on clusi on thatpet i t i on er f a i l e dt o e s t ab l i s h th a tth e h arm he s u f f e r e da tth e h an d s o f

g an g me mbe r s i n El S a lv a d o rw a s o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . See Ra m os-L op ezv. H older , 563 F. 3d 855, 858- 62 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( c onc l udi ng thatr e s i s t anc e t o gang a c t i vi ty i s not a part i cul arsoci algroup f or the pu rpo se of e st abl i shi ng nexu s t o a prot ec t ed g r o u n d ) . A c c o r d in g ly , p e ti ti o n e r ' s a s y lu m c la im f a il s . I d. P E T I T I ON F OR R E VI E W DE NI E D.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 738 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 

limitations in North Dakota, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. CRAMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

vehicle weight limitations in North Dakota, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS IN NORTH DA4 KOTA. 

5 Section 127(t) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in the subsection heading by inserting 

8 ‘‘NORTH DAKOTA AND’’ before ‘‘IDAHO’’; 

9 (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 

10 inserting ‘‘North Dakota or’’ before ‘‘Idaho’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 738 IH

1 (3) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘Idaho State 

2 law’’ and inserting ‘‘the law of the relevant State’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
585 A.2d 950

#### IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR H. SORENSEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

February 11, 1991.

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that ARTHUR H. SORENSEN of ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, be publicly reprimanded for violation of *Opinion*326, 99 *N.J.L.J.*298 (1976) by failing to turn over to clients all interest accrued on client funds in respondent’s special trustee account from January 1986 through November 1988; and the Disciplinary Review Board further recommending that respondent be required to turn over to the IOLTA Fund all monies kept by him as interest on said trustee account for said period; and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is adopted and ARTHUR H. SORENSEN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

*590ORDERED that respondent forthwith deliver to the IOLTA Fund all monies kept by him as interest accrued on client funds in respondent’s special trustee account from January 1986 through November 1988; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
| (logo)  **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

RBSCommercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor

600Washington Blvd.

Stamford,CT 06901

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFRBS 2014 C21

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-C21, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.      A review of the activities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.      To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicerhas fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
#### In re Jay NOLEN.

No. 2010-B-1732.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 2010.

|,ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

Respondent pled guilty to two criminal offenses, one involving assault and the *170other involving DWI. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated respondent has violated Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Jay Nolen, Louisiana Bar Roll number 10019, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a five-year period of probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid. JOHNSON, J., dissents and assigns reasons. GUIDRY, J., dissents.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

JOHNSON, J.,

dissents and assigns reasons:

11 In my view, this conduct requires a period of actual suspension.

I dissent from the majority’s determination that the suspension should be fully deferred.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: December 11, 2006

 
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Robert B.  Goergen                |   |
| Robert B.  Goergen                    |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H.Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certifythat:

 

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: December 16,2004

 

 
| /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert H. Barghaus                         |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----