alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 195 (Friday, October 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25658]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting; Board of Governors

Board Votes To Close September 30, 2010, Meeting

    In person and by telephone vote on September 30, 2010, a majority 
of the members contacted and voting, the Board of Governors of the 
United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public 
observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The 
Board determined that no earlier public notice was possible.

Items Considered:
    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

Contact Person for More Information: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. 
Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25658 Filed 10-6-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          43,147
<SECURITIES>                                   215,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               389,867
<PP&E>                                         106,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          296,611
<BONDS>                                         37,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,586
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,503
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,966
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84


</TABLE>
585 A.2d 387

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN MALONE.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10653

Conference Calendar

__________________

JAMES R. FISHER,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-01185-R

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James R. Fisher appeals from the district court's order

denying habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argues 

that he was "in custody" during the time he was awaiting

sentencing on his federal conviction because he was subject to

restraints not shared by the public generally. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's order and find no reversible

error. Because Fisher challenges the legality of his conviction,
No. 95-10653

-2-

any claims that arose at or prior to sentencing and that cannot

be brought on direct appeal must be addressed in a subsequent 

§ 2255 motion. See United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 77 (5th

Cir. 1990).

 AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-22-00480-CV

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH 

DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS 

CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF J.P.S., A CHILD

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On October 7, 2022, appellant Cayla Payne filed a notice of appeal from a final order 

terminating her parental rights. Appeals in parental termination cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals, which include expedited deadlines 

and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The intermediate 

appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that appeals in such 

cases are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is
2

filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a).

Under these expedited deadlines, the reporter’s record in this case should have 

been filed on October 17, 2022, and Payne’s brief on November 7, 2022. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b), 38.6(a). However, Payne’s appellate counsel failed to request the 

reporter’s record until November 2, 2022, causing a significant delay in this accelerated 

proceeding. See id. R. 38.6(b)(1) (requiring appellant to request the reporter’s record when

she files her notice of appeal). To date, the Court has not received the reporter’s record or 

Payne’s brief.

To ensure the parties comply with the filing deadlines going forward, the Court orders 

the court reporter to file the reporter’s record by November 14, 2022. The Court further 

orders Payne to file her brief by December 5, 2022, and appellee to file its brief by 

December 27, 2022. A request for extension by either party will be disfavored absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 

8th day of November, 2022.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Goergen                    |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | June 5, 2008                    |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard containedtherein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00217

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141

- 335859

- 22

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### O MAR 

### A POLO 

### J ACOBO 

### , Appellant

V



### .
M ONICA 

### R ENEE 

### J ORDAN 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On October 20, 2023, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we coul d
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with

the court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10. 5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42. 3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : November 22, 2023
584 A.2d 251

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LOUIS CRIADO.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

1.                  I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                 The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.           The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: September11, 2006
| /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert H.  Barghaus                         |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-200877 on Form S-8 of our reportdated March 27, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Hortonworks Inc. (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change ofHortonworks, Inc’s fiscal year end from April 30 to December 31) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, California

March 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 11


                           IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                                    May 31,                 May 31,
                                                              ------------------      ------------------
                                                               1999        1998        1999        1998
                                                               ----        ----        ----        ----
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income                                                    $  545      $  557      $  919      $  945

Weighted average number of issued shares
      outstanding                                              4,734       4,734       4,734       4,734

Shares used in computation of basic earnings per
      common stock                                             4,734       4,734       4,734       4,734
                                                              ======      ======      ======      ======

Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and
      stock warrants after application of treasury stock
      method                                                       0          12           0          11
                                                              ------      ------      ------      ------

Common and common equivalent shares
      outstanding--diluted                                     4,734       4,746       4,734       4,745
                                                              ======      ======      ======      ======

Basic and diluted earnings per common share                   $  .11      $  .12      $  .19      $  .20
                                                              ======      ======      ======      ======
</TABLE>


                                       11
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7293 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7293

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louise and 
Bob Slaughter Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order filed June 22, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00509

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF C .F., JR., K.F. AND C .F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 328th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- DCV

- 237456



### ORDER This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue. The judgment was signed May 24, 2018 . The notice of appeal was due within 20 days, which was June 13,
2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 28.4(a). Appellant R.M. , however, filed her notice of appeal on June 21, 2018 , a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal.

A motio n for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice2

of appeal. While a n extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).

A ccordingly, we ORDER appellant R.M. to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal by July 5, 2018 . See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
ooma-ex1016_186.htm



Exhibit 10.16

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Executive Change of Control and Severance Agreement dated June 9, 2015 (the “Existing Agreement”), between Ooma, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 525 Almanor Ave, Suite 200, Sunnyvale, CA 94085 (“Company”), and Eric Stang (the “Executive”), is effective as of the later date set forth on the signature page hereto (the “Effective Date”).

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into the Existing Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now desire to amend the Existing Agreement as set forth herein; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11(e) of the Existing Agreement, the amendment contemplated by the parties must be contained in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of each of the Company and the Executive.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.Amendment of Existing Agreement.  Section 6(d) of the Existing Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

(d) Change in Control Period. For purposes of this Agreement, “Change in Control Period” means the period beginning three (3) months prior to, and ending twelve (12) months following, a Change in Control.

2.Limited Effect.  Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Existing Agreement are and will remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties.  On and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Existing Agreement to “this Agreement,” “the Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import, and each reference to the Existing Agreement in any other agreements, documents or instruments executed and delivered pursuant to, or in connection with, the Existing Agreement, will mean and be a reference to the Existing Agreement as modified by this Amendment.

3.Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Amendment is governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.   

4.Entire Agreement.  This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and cancels all contemporaneous or prior agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter of this Amendment.  

Page 1   Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Change of Control and Severance Agreement

 



Exhibit 10.16



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.


		
	
Ooma, Inc.
	
Executive

	
Signature: /s/ Jenny Yeh
	
Signature: /s/ Eric Stang

	
Name: Jenny Yeh
	
Name:  Eric Stang

	
Title: VP & General Counsel
	
Title: CEO

	
Date: 9/13/2021 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
	
Date: 9/20/2021




 

 

Page 2   Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Change of Control and Severance Agreement
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          97,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,523,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                   712,730 
<INVENTORY>                                    257,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,880,781
<PP&E>                                       8,929,986
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,057,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,393,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,914,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,473
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,627,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,393,891
<SALES>                                     23,404,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,404,269
<CGS>                                       16,152,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,471,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               697,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             889,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,765,325)  
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,106,129)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,659,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,659,196)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>