alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contians summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                            169
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                       12
<INVENTORY>                                       877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,909
<PP&E>                                            439
<DEPRECIATION>                                    289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              53
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         1
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,465
<SALES>                                         1,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,858
<CGS>                                           1,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (252)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                85
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       85
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10




</TABLE>
584 A.2d 216

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. N.D.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Johan P. Finley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PDSGaming Corporation, certifythat:

1.      I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDS Gaming Corporation;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   [Omitted];

(c)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:    |   | May 17, 2004 |   | /s/ Johan P.  Finley                                     |
|----------|--------|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| * * |   |              |   | Johan P. Finley, *Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7364 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to extend the 

supervisory authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

to include assessing compliance with the Military Lending Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to extend the supervisory authority of the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection to include assessing compliance with the Military Lending Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Protection 

5 for Our Military Families Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7364 IH

1 SEC. 2. BUREAU EXAMINATION AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT 

2 TO MILITARY LENDING ACT COMPLIANCE. 

3 The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 

4 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.) is amended— 

5 (1) in section 1024(b)(1)(A), by inserting be6 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘and section 987 of 

7 title 10, United States Code’’; 

8 (2) in section 1025(b)(1)— 

9 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

10 and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respec11 tively; and 

12 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) 

13 the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) with respect to insured depository in15 stitutions, assessing compliance with the re16 quirements of section 987 of title 10, United 

17 States Code;’’; and 

18 (3) in section 1026(c)(1), by inserting before 

19 the period the following: ‘‘and with the requirements 

20 of section 987 of title 10, United States Code, of in21 sured depository institutions described in subsection 

22 (a)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Thomas PRICE and Sweet Things of Metairie, Inc. v. KRAFT REALTY COMPANY, L.L.C., Catherine Kraft and Marcia Miller.

No. 2010-CC-1782.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 2010.

In re Price, Thomas; Sweet Things of Metairie Inc.; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, Nos. 655-701, 656-719; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-479.

Stay denied. Writ denied.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

January 21, 2011

Mr. Peter Cario

Patterson & Wagner

Northwest Center

7550 I-10 West,  Suite 500

San Antonio, TX 78229

Mr. Tim Maloney

Law Office of Tim Maloney

900 S.E. Military Drive

San Antonio, TX 78214

Ms. Laura A. Cavaretta

Plunkett & Gibson, Inc.

70 NE Loop 410, Suite 1100

San Antonio, TX 78216

Ms. Elizabeth Conry Davidson

Attorney at Law

1802 Blanco Road

San Antonio, TX 78212-2614

RE:Case Number:  09-0665

Court of Appeals Number:  04-08-00200-CV

Trial Court Number:  2007-CI-11855

Style:TERRY LEONARD, P.A. AND APRIL DAWN HAIN, M.D.

v.

ANDRE GLENN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 09-0665Page 2**
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Correction in Burden Table.
 SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration published an Agency Information Collection document in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         of September 17, 2010 (FR Doc. 201-023260), on page 57037, regarding the Black Lung Clinics Program Database (OMB No. 0915-0292). In the burden table, the Total responses, Hours per response and Total burden hours are incorrect. Correction In the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         issue of September 17, 2010, FR Doc. 201-023260, on page 57037, correct the Total responses, Hours per response and Total burden hours as follows: Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Responses per 
                             respondent
Total 
                             responses
Hours per 
                             response
Total burden hoursDatabase
15
1
15
20
300
 Dated: September 28, 2010. Sahira Rafiullah, Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.


[FR Doc. 2010-25113 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeffrey Mackay, certify that:

 

1.    Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TEO Foods Inc. (the "Registrant");

 

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

 

June 30, 2020

 

/s/ Jeffrey Mackay

Jeffrey Mackay

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20475 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RICHARD CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:92-CR-184-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Richard Cruz, federal prisoner # 6 0 6 9 2-079, appeals the denial of his motion for a sentence reductio n pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He was f o u n d guilty by a jury of being a felon in possession of a firearm an d w a s sentenced to 235 months in prison. Cruz contends that Amendment 709 to the sentencing guidelines applies retroactively to his criminal history calculation bec a u s e th e amendment is a U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Sep tem ber 1 3, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20475 Document: 00511600908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2011No. 10-20475

clarifyin g a m e n d m e nt. He asserts that as a result of the amendment, his criminal history score should be recalculated. The decision whether to reduce a sent e n ce under § 3582(c)(2) is discretionary, so the denial of a § 3582(c) motion is reviewe d f or abuse of that discretion. United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied , 130 S. Ct. 3462 (2010). The district court i s a u th orized to reduce a sentence based on a sentencing range that subsequently was low e red by the Sentencing Commission only if the amendment to the guidelines is listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10(c). See § 3582(c)(2); § 1B1.10(a)(1); § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1(A)); United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 105 F.3d 981, 982 (5th Cir. 1997). Amendment 709 is not listed in § 1B1

. 1 0(c), so the district court was not authorized to reduce the sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), and the denial of the motion was not an abuse of discretion. See Evans , 587 F.3d at 672, 674. Cruz’s motio n for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. There is no right to appointed counsel in a § 3 582(c)(2) proceeding. United States v. Whitebird , 55 F.3d 1007, 1010-11 (5th Cir. 1995). Moreover, because the district court was not authorized to grant § 3582(c)(2) relief, the interest of justice does not require appointment of counsel. Cf. United States v. Robinson, 542 F.3d 1045, 1052 (5th Cir. 2008) (finding th at th e interest of justice required the appointment of counsel where appeal raised issues not previou s ly r e s olved by this court’s precedent). AFFIRMED; Motion DENIED.

2 Case: 10-20475 Document: 00511600908 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2011
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 849 

AN ACT 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 849 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors Ac3 cess to Medicare Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI5 SORY BOARD. 

6 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec7 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec8 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend9 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi10 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

11 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 849 

AN ACT 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection 

pendent Payment Advisory Board. and Affordable Care Act providing for the Inde-
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kenneth Cole Productions,
                     Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010
                     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
                     hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Edelman, Chief Financial Officer
                     of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
                     pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                     amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     results of operations of the Company.  /s/ DAVID P. EDELMANDavid P. EdelmanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.August 5, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2498

ANTHONY G. BRYANT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT 

OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, SCDHEC; ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; CHARLESTON COUNTY 

ADMINISTRATOR,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-03037-MBS-MGB)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 25, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony G. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis. We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). An order denying a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is 

an appealable interlocutory order. Roberts v. United States Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 

(1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. 

Dillard v. Liberty Loan Corp., 626 F.2d 363, 365 (4th Cir. 1980) (stating standard of 

review). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. U.S. Army Corps of 

Eng’rs, No. 2:18-cv-03037-MBS-MGB (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[]Docket No. PR05-16-002]


Enstor Grama Ridge Storage and Transportation, LLC; Notice of 
Petition for Rate Approval

October 6, 2010.
    Take notice that on September 24, 2010, Enstor Grama Ridge Storage 
and Transportation, LLC filed pursuant to section 385.212 of the 
Commission's regulations, a petition requesting that the Commission 
remove the five-year rate filing requirement that the Commission had 
previously imposed in its order granting market-based rate authority.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14525146575b7a787d7a71476164647b666054727166773a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15535047565a7b797c7b70466065657a676155737067763b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday October 18, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25799 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,489
<SECURITIES>                                    18,626
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                       413
<INVENTORY>                                      7,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,464
<PP&E>                                           4,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,027
<SALES>                                          8,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,876
<CGS>                                            7,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    108
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>