alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|/S/ SOMSAK
CHIVAVIBUL                                                                                       
|Somsak Chivavibul President and Chief
Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer) Navient Funding, LLC
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ LOUIS G. LANGE, M.D., PH.D.
|                   |  |  |  | Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.    
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tremon EVERETT, et al.

No. 2011-KK-2749.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Everett, Tremon et al.; Hadley Jr., Eric; Hadley Sr., Eric; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 506-271; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1617.

Denied.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden,

Arizona, Department of

Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 96-99025

96-99026

10-99011

D.C. No.

CV-87-00234-CKJ

District of Arizona,

Tucson

ORDER

Filed February 17, 2016

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Stephen Reinhardt,

and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Order
2 SMITH V. RYAN

ORDER

The opinion filed February 4, 2016 is hereby amended as

follows:

1. Slip Op. at 1: In the heading, replace “DORA B.

SCHRIRO” with “CHARLES L. RYAN”.

2. Slip Op. at 1: In the heading, replace “D.C. No. CV-87-

00234-RMB” with “D.C. No. CV-87-00234-CKJ District of

Arizona, Tucson”.

3. Slip Op. at 4, lines 4-6: Replace “After that hearing the

state trial court denied Smith’s Atkins claim, and the Arizona

Court of Appeal and Arizona Supreme Court affirmed.” with

“After that hearing, the state trial court denied Smith’s Atkins

claim, the Arizona Court of Appeals denied special action

relief, and the Arizona Supreme Court denied Smith’s

petition for review.”
585 A.2d 398

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES IVORY, JR.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
No. 87-6421.

#### Frazier *v.*Seabold, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Goergen,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: December 16, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert B. Goergen                    |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25539]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 17, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on June 28, 2010 (75 FR 36683), Siegfried (USA), 33 Industrial 
Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by letter to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule I.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in 
bulk for sale to customers.
    Three comments were received. Two of the three comments supported 
the granting of registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class 
of controlled substance listed to this applicant.
    The third comment objected to the granting of registration. 
However, after a thorough review of this matter, DEA has concluded that 
the issues raised in the comment and objection do not warrant the 
denial of this application.
    DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined 
that the registration of Siegfried (USA) to manufacture the listed 
basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public 
interest at this time. DEA has investigated Siegfried (USA) to ensure 
that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. 
The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-25539 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG), as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of SES performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Inspector General.

# DATES:

Effective October 1, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Phyllis Hughes, Director, Human                               ( print page 62510)                            Capital Advisory Services, Administration and Management, DoD OIG, 400 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 602-4516.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following executives are appointed to the DoD OIG, PRB:

## Ann Calvaresi Barr

Deputy Inspector General, Department of Transportation.

## Geoffrey A. Cherrington

Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, General Services Administration.

## Richard J. Griffin

Deputy Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs.

## Frank P. LaRocca

Counsel to the Inspector General, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

## Robert Keith West

Assistant Inspector General for Audit Services, Department of Education.

Dated: October 6, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-25548 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INDERJIT KAUR, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 14-73434 

Agency No. A070-544-016 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Inderjit Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s 

(“IJ”) final order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision to deny 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73434 

Kaur’s application for a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). See 8

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Kaur fails to raise a colorable constitutional claim or 

question of law to invoke our jurisdiction. See Corona-Mendez v. Holder, 593 

F.3d 1143, 1146 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court has jurisdiction to review a 

discretionary determination only if it involves constitutional claims or questions of 

law); Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (a claim that the 

agency did not properly weigh hardship evidence does not state a colorable due 

process claim); De Mercado v. Mukasey, 566 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir. 2008) 

(evaluating hardship to a qualifying relative necessarily implicates family unity, 

and to carve out an exception to lack of jurisdiction would “swallow the rule 

itself”). 

In light of this decision, we need not reach Kaur’s contentions regarding the 

IJ’s credibility finding. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 28, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-13117

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00013-CR-5-RS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

FOEY B. PADGETT, JR., 

a.k.a. Foye B. Padgett, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 28, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Robert Augustus Harper, appointed counsel for Foey B. Padgett, Jr, has filed

a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Padgett’s

motion to amend his response to counsel’s Anders brief, dated December 21, 2006,

to include his initial brief, filed on January 8, 2007, is GRANTED, as the motion

will not prejudice counsel or the government. 

Furthermore, our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and convictions and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2019

No. 04-19-00275-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.C, JR., S.R.C., E.D.C., CHILDREN,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00862

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which 

must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX.

R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was filed on August 5, 2019, making appellee’s brief due 

August 26, 2019. The appellee has filed a motion for extension of time requesting a twenty-one 

day extension to file its brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief must be filed no later 

than September 16, 2019. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this 

appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
No. 14,341.

#### Cravens *v.*The Eagle Cotton Mills Company.

Filed June 19, 1889;

petition for a rehearing overruled Sept. 20, 1889.

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

*C. E. Walker, A. 'D. Van Osdol*and JET. *Francisco,*for appellant.

*0. A. Eorbly*and *W. 0. Ford,*for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

The questions involved in this appeal are identical with those considered in *Cravens*v. *Eagle Cotton Mills Co., ante,*p. 6, and in pursuance of the stipulation that a decision in one case should determine both, the judgment of the circuit court in the above entitled cause is affirmed, with costs.
585 A.2d 386

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NANCY WEATHERLY.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Atul Sabharwal, Chief Executive Officer of Snipp Interactive Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2016





/s/  Atul Sabharwal

Atul Sabharwal,

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                                             
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN                    
|                    |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,806,904               1,806,904
<SECURITIES>                                 1,646,214               1,646,214
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,487,679               2,487,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                   245,000                 245,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,557,011               6,557,011
<PP&E>                                       2,583,397               2,583,397
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,306,429               1,306,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,184,574              19,184,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,445,728               5,445,728
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     9,613,807               9,613,807
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,355,416)             (1,355,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,184,574              19,184,574
<SALES>                                      2,655,003               5,444,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,655,003               5,444,001
<CGS>                                        1,413,042               2,629,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,914,855               5,717,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (77,945)               (174,197)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,369                 179,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (315,276)               (278,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    9,000                (157,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (324,276)               (121,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (324,276)               (121,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>