alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 9, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00928-CV

VALET LIVING, LLC AND VALET PARENT, INC.

D/B/A VALET WASTE HOLDINGS, INC., Appellants

V.

JASMINE AMBER MITCHELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09789

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Smith

Opinion by Justice Osborne

By motion filed September 6, 2022, appellants informed the Court that the 

parties have settled their dispute. Appellants move to dismiss the appeal, advising 

the Court that dismissal will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it 

would otherwise be entitled because appellee has not noticed a cross-appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

210928f.p05

/Leslie Osborne//

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VALET LIVING, LLC AND 

VALET PARENT, INC. D/B/A 

VALET WASTE HOLDINGS, INC., 

Appellants

No. 05-21-00928-CV V.

JASMINE AMBER MITCHELL, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09789.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne. Justices Schenck and Smith 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Subject to any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellee 

Jasmine Amber Mitchell recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants 

Valet Living, LLC and Valet Parent, Inc. d/b/a Valet Waste Holdings, Inc.

Judgment entered this 9

th day of September, 2022.
585 A.2d 358

#### IN THE MATTER OF WOODHAVEN LUMBER. STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ASBURY PARK PRESS.

July 17, 1990.

Leave to appeal granted.
Motion Granted in Part and Order filed November 1, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 00753 - CV

____________ PARHAM FAMILY LIMITE D PARTNERSHIP AND VA N E. PARHAM, JR. , Appellant s V. DIANE MORGAN F/KA/ D IANE PARHAM , Appellee &

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 007 9 5 - CV

____________ PARHAM ENTERPRISES , Appellant

V . DIANE MORGAN F/K/A DIANE PARHAM , Appellee On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 933543

### ORDER

On August 15, 2012, Parham Family Limited Partnership and Van E. Parham, Jr . filed a notice of appeal from the judgment signed August 8, 2012, and the appeal was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14 - 12 - 00753 - CV. On August 30, 2012, Parha m Enterprises filed a notice of appeal from the same judgment, which was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14 - 12 - 00 795 - CV. On September 21 , 2012, Parham Family Limited Partnership and Van E. Parham, Jr. moved to consolidate the related ap peals. The motion is GRANTED IN PART and we issue the following order: We order the appeals pending under our appellate case numbers 14 - 12 - 00 753 - CV and 14 - 12 - 00 795 - CV CONSOLIDATED. The existing filing deadlines in case number 14 - 12 - 00 753 - CV will apply to both cases. Accordingly, the record is due December 6, 2012. All documents filed from this date forward are to be identified with appellate case number 14 - 12 - 00753 - CV and are to be filed in that case. Further, we order the record filed in our appellate case number 14 - 12 - 00195 - CV transferred to appellate case number 14 - 12 - 00753 - CV. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,**Robert B. Goergen, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and I5d-l 5(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of on annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 4, 2004            |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/  Robert B. Goergen                |   |
| Robert  B. Goergen                    |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert H.  Barghaus                      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus                           |
|   | Vice President and  Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | September 9,  2005                      |

 

 

This certification ismade solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 811 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat obligations financing 

professional sports stadiums as private activity bonds if such obligations 

meet the private business use test. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat obligations financing professional sports stadiums as private 

activity bonds if such obligations meet the private business use test. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Subsidies for 

5 Stadiums Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 811 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS FINANCING 

2 PROFESSIONAL SPORTS STADIUMS AS PRI3 VATE ACTIVITY BONDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 141(b) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(10) SPECIAL RULE FOR PROFESSIONAL

8 SPORTS STADIUMS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

10 issue any proceeds of which are to be used to 

11 provide a professional sports stadium, such 

12 issue shall be treated as meeting the private se13 curity or payment test of subsection (b)(2). 

14 ‘‘(B) PROFESSIONAL SPORTS STADIUM.— 

15 For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘pro16 fessional sports stadium’ means any facility 

17 (and appurtenant real property) which, during 

18 at least 5 days during any calendar year, is 

19 used as a stadium or arena for professional 

20 sports exhibitions, games, or training.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date 

23 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 803 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Glendale, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Glendale, New York. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR GLENDALE, 

4 NEW YORK. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this section, the United States Postal Service shall 

7 designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to the area 

8 encompassing only Glendale, New York. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Delvin WIGGINS.

No. 2010-KP-2094.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension-, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 10,583; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010-KW-0745.

Denied.

JOHNSON, GUIDRY and CLARK, JJ„ would grant.
Exhibit32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
this Amended Annual Report of Kisses From Italy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:   May 28, 2020 | /s/ Michael Di Turi
        Michael Di Turi, Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                     
|Dated:   May 28, 2020 | /s/ Claudio Ferri
        Claudio Ferri, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24946]



[[Page 61481]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Supplemental Notice of Meeting

September 27, 2010.
    On September 15, 2010, the Commission provided notice that a 
meeting will be held to present the results of the cost benefit 
analysis conducted by Charles River Associates and Resero Consulting to 
study the effects of Entergy Services, Inc. and Cleco Power joining the 
Southwest Power Pool regional transmission organization. As stated in 
the September 15 notice, the meeting will be held on September 30, 2010 
from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the following address:

Astor Crowne Plaza, 739 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70130, 504-962-
0500.

    The attached agenda provides details on the topics that will be 
discussed at the meeting. Those wishing to attend the meeting by 
teleconference may do so using dial-in number (877) 932-5833 and 
passcode 157403.
    For further information about this meeting, please contact:

Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 
(317) 249-5937, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef9f8e9b9d868c84c18c838e9d8a96af898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27574653554e444c09444b4655425e674142554409404851">[email protected]</span></a>.
Doug Roe, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-
6566, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e6a617b69626f7d207c616b4e686b7c6d20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88ece7fdefe4e9fba6fae7edc8eeedfaeba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

Final Presentation on the Cost Benefit Analysis Conducted by Charles 
River Associates and Resero Consulting To Study the Effects of Entergy 
Services, Inc. and Cleco Power Joining the Southwest Power Pool 
Regional Transmission Organization

Agenda

9 a.m. to 9:15 a.m.--Introductions & Overview of Agenda
9:15 a.m. to 9:45 a.m.--Opening Statements
9:50 a.m. to 10 a.m.--Overview of Study History & Process
10 a.m. to 10:10 a.m.--Break
10:10 a.m. to 11:20 a.m.--Final Results Presentation
11:20 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.--Next Steps
11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.--Question and Answer Session
12 p.m.--Meeting Adjourned

[FR Doc. 2010-24946 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,848
<SECURITIES>                                   193,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,685
<PP&E>                                         113,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 498,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,278
<BONDS>                                         46,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   498,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,224
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  390,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,958
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


       SUBSIDIARY OF WAYPOINT FINANCIAL             STATE OF ORGANIZATION
       --------------------------------             ---------------------
Waypoint Bank..............................               United States
Waypoint Financial Investment Corporation..               Delaware
New Service Corporation....................               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Service Corporation...............               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Brokerage Services, Inc. .........               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Insurance Services, Inc. .........               Pennsylvania
Owen Insurance Inc. .......................               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Insurance Group, Inc. ............               Pennsylvania
Lenders Support Group Inc. ................               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Capital Trust I ..................               Delaware
Waypoint Capital Trust II .................               Delaware

       SUBSIDIARY OF WAYPOINT BANK                  STATE OF ORGANIZATION
       ---------------------------                  ---------------------
Waypoint Investment Corporation............               Delaware
H. S. Service Corporation..................               Pennsylvania
First Harrisburg Service Corporation.......               Pennsylvania
C.B.L. Service Corporation.................               Pennsylvania
AVSTAR Mortgage Corporation................               Pennsylvania



                                       90
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert H. Barghaus                         |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | April 14, 2005                             |

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
NO. 07-05-0018-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 19, 2005

______________________________ ORLANDO ANTWONIE HARRIS, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTE R COUNTY; NO. 47,47 3-C; HONO RABLE R ICHARD DAMBOLD, J UDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL , JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Pending before this Court is appellant Orlando Antwonie Harris’s motion to dismiss in which he represents he nolonger desires to prosecute this appeal. As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion bears appellant’s signature.2

No decision of

this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. No motion for rehea ring wil l be ente rtained a nd our ma ndate wi ll issueforthwith . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,457
<SECURITIES>                                   206,225
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,828
<PP&E>                                         116,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 512,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          297,745
<BONDS>                                         49,153
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   512,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,013
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,640
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
584 A.2d 201

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NICHOLAS RENNE.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.