alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12279 and #12280]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of IOWA (FEMA-1930-DR), dated 08/14/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2010 through 08/31/2010.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         10/01/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/13/2010.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/16/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of IOWA, dated 08/14/2010 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans*): Monroe.                    

All counties contiguous to the above named primary county have previously been declared.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-25618 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 11.1

                               FRESH AMERICA CORP.

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS*

                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  QUARTER ENDED           SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                             -----------------------   -----------------------
                                              JUNE 28,     JUNE 27,     JUNE 28,     JUNE 27,
                                                1996         1997         1996         1997
                                             ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>       
Net income applicable to common and common
  equivalent shares ......................   $    1,407   $    1,531   $    1,755   $    2,476
                                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding        3,639        3,741        3,642        3,736

Effect of stock options and warrants .....          217          213          213          216
                                             ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares ......................        3,856        3,954        3,855        3,952
                                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Net income per common and common
equivalent share - fully diluted .........   $     0.36   $     0.39   $     0.46   $     0.63
                                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>

*  Earnings per share are presented on a fully diluted basis.
FRANKIE SILVESTRI

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 2692

Opinion filed August 15, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Frankie Silvestri , pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So.

2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

This Court reserves jurisdiction to consider the imposition of sanctions.

ROWE, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### CLARA MORGAN SHACKIL v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL. AND PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY.

December 8, 1987.

Leave to appeal granted.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62613-62614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on October 13, 2010 
at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt an interim final 
temporary rule under Section 766 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 
and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, to provide for the 
reporting of certain security-based swap transactions and including an 
interpretive note regarding retention and recordkeeping requirements 
for certain security-based swap transactions.
    2. The Commission will consider whether to propose Regulation MC 
pursuant to Section 765 of the Dodd-Frank Act to mitigate conflicts of 
interest at security-based swap clearing agencies, security-based swap 
execution facilities, and national security exchanges that post or make 
available for trading security-based swaps.
    3. The Commission will consider whether to propose rules that would 
implement Section 945 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act, which requires an issuer of asset-backed securities 
(ABS) to perform a review of the assets underlying the ABS and disclose 
information relating to the review. The Commission will also consider 
whether to propose rules that would implement Section 15E(s)(4)(A) of 
the Exchange Act as added by Section 932 of the Act, which requires an 
ABS issuer or underwriter to make publicly available the findings and 
conclusions of any third-party due diligence report.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 62614]]


    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25677 Filed 10-7-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
584 A.2d 247

#### HELEN GOLDMAN v. PASQUALE PETRALIA.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 385

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY BRYANT.

October 2, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
 ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medley Management Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seth Taube, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 By:/s/ Seth TaubeSeth TaubeCo-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 April 29, 2020
 
 A signed original of this certification required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

                                                                                           Exhibit 99.1

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Frontier  Airlines,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I.
Jeffery S. Potter,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 12(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffery S. Potter
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Eugene EDDY, Appellant.

No. 99-4306.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 4, 2001.

Decided Jan. 12, 2001.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Richard Eddy pleaded guilty to causing a videotape of child pornography to be mailed and delivered to him, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461, and was sentenced to fifty-two months imprisonment and three years supervised release. For the reasons discussed below, we reject each of the arguments he raises on appeal, and we affirm.

*594First, Eddy argues that the district court1 erred in setting his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 rather than U.S.S.G. § 2G2.4. We disagree: the proper Guideline was applied because Eddy received through the mail a videotape involving the sexual exploitation of a minor.

Next, Eddy argues that his offense level should not have been increased by two under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(l) because there was insufficient evidence that the videotape depicted a prepubescent minor or a minor under the age of twelve years. We conclude that the district court — having personally viewed the videotape, and having considered the affidavit of a pediatrician who opined that the girl was prepubescent and younger than eleven — did not clearly err. *See United States v. Marquardt,*949 F.2d 283, 286-87 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (district court did not clearly err in determining that subject was prepubescent where postal inspector so opined, films were furnished to court, and defendant did not present any evidence to contrary).

Finally, Eddy argues that the district court erroneously denied his entrapment-based downward-departure motion. The matter is unreviewable, however, because the court was aware of its authority to depart and discretionarity declined to do so. *See United States v. Turechek,*138 F.3d 1226, 1228 (8th Cir.1998) (district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from Guidelines is unreviewable so long as court was aware of its authority to do so).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Order entered July 5, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00307

- CR

KAMAURIS JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1172084

- U



### O RDER

The Court REIN S TAT E S the a pp ea l.

On May 17, 2016, we abated t he appeal a nd o r d e r e d the trial c ourt to make findin g s

regarding why appellant’s brief was not timely filed

. On June 30, 2016, we r e c e ived

a pp e l l a n t’s b r ie f and an extension motion

. Th e r e f o r e

, in the in t e r e st of e x p e di t ing the a pp ea l,

we V A C A TE the May 17, 2016 o r d e r to the e x tent it re quir e s findin g s.

Appellant’s June 30, 2016 motion to extend the time for filing appellant’s brief is

GRANTED

. We ORDER a ppellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51085 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOE ALBERT ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CR-279-ALL-JN

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Attorney Jesse Z. Weiss, appointed to represent Joe Albert Alvarado, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Alvarado and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Attorney Weiss also has filed an addendum to the Anders brief. Alvarado has filed responses to the Anders motion and brief and to the addendum, and he moves for leave to proceed pro se; for leave to supplement the record withNo. 00-51085 -2- transcripts; and for leave to file a declaration. Our independent review of the brief, the addendum, the responses, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Weiss’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; Weiss is excused from further responsibilities herein; Alvarado’s motions are DENIED; and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6220

ANTHONY EDEN CAVINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LAWRENCE GREER, Warden Central Facility,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-99-76-AM)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Eden Cavins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

January 28, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on February 1, 1999. It is the date

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 58 and 79(a); Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Eden Cavins appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cavins

v. Greer, No. CA-99-76-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 1, 1999).* We deny Cavins’

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Minority Biomedical Research Chemistry Grant Applications.                     

*Date:*                         November 4, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, 1 Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John J. Laffan, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN18J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2773,                         *laffanjo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25635 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

MICKEY CASTILLO, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 86 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2015, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Application for an Exercise of Either King’s

Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction and the Application for Post-Submission 

Communication are DENIED.
585 A.2d 353

#### ALEXANDER LEVCHUK, ET AL. v. MILLSTONE TOWNSHIP, RVP SAND CO., ET AL.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 379

#### RICHARD ROBERTS v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANY.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David M. Kirk, Chief Executive Officer and President of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that, to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2009.



/s/ David M. KirkName:

David M. KirkTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and President


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
585 A.2d 343

#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.S.D. IN THE MATTER OF M.A.D., AN INFANT.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.